skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I started doing a redesign some time ago, but never finished it [1].

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/30225560/poc-haskell.png
> Why do you think your security should matter more to your neighbor than his ability to make money by renting out his property? He's got family to feed too.

Not my own security, but the security of the person who pays for the room.

> Why do you think collecting taxes is what everyone considers a just thing to do?

I don't care about what people thinks is just or not. Taxes must be paid, because otherwise there would be no public services, such as healthcare or education. We rely on them.

> Why do you think fairness is when hotels can charge visitors twice as much and provide twice as shittier service?

You are free to open a hotel which follows the law but has lower prices.

> Why do you think laws cannot be broken, if unjust? Many people smoke weed which is illegal in many countries. Do you consider those people to be criminals? Would you look them in the eye and tell them to go vote harder next time and then send them to jail?

A very weird comparison you're pulling here. I won't even bother to respond to this...
The Dark Art of Interrogation
A packaged installer would be nice, but this is an IDE, so I'm not too surprised it can be installed using a package manager that may not be mainstream.

I am concerned at the tone of your response and am sad so say I expected this to be at the top. I don't think your post is nice or adds value to HN. Consider saying nothing at all.
The Swift Language Cheat Sheet and Quick Reference
Yes, I am comfortable getting executables from Steam.
I'll just trust AirBnB's comments of previous renters more than any regulation. Even more so in a bureaucratic country!
Cortical.io, a web service for language intelligence
Google Material design framework
I am concerned that you decided to publicly school me on my commenting style. I don't think you comment is nice or adds value to HN. Consider saying nothing at all.
Sure, but you know about that going in. It's part of the deal. You pay a premium and get a premium product with pretty well defined limits on it's features. It's a fair deal.

The problem with Google is so many of the product they put out are utterly unfit for purpose, showing a blatant disregard for and contempt of their customer's right to a reasonable product in return for their money. First near-unusable first gen Google TV, Nexus phones with fuzzy cameras, The first gen Nexus 7 tablet with not TRIM on the flash storage for a whole year leading to rapidly degrading device performance, Chromebooks sold with 2 years of free mobile service that suddenly stops after a year, encouraging the growth of a whole ecosystem around Google Reader that suddenly goes away.

I don't think Google intentionally set out to do any of those things, but equally they didn't put any significant effort into stopping them happening either. They really just don't care. Move fast, break things, iterate. That's fine for them, but it's leaving a long wide trail of broken promises and damaged users and customers in it's bull-rush into the future and it's taking that approach for entirely selfish reasons.

Google may be giving you free things, I'm a happy Gmail and Google Docs user myself, but they're not doing it because they're your friend.
That's what I mean - most resources are shared. Any kind of sublet agreement is shared. A hotel room is shared. A cab is a shared resource. A bus, a subway is shared - much more so than an Uber car. Roads are shared. That's not a new thing and the term "sharing economy" was coined just for the marketing aspect, to make it sound like something nice, to have the connotation of "sharing a meal with friends", of community. It's not. It's a cold-hearted business transaction - there's nothing wrong with business transactions, but please if it's business, just don't try to get emotional on me.
App marketing by Nordeus – how to market a sports game
How does it solve climate change?
I've never read one of these in full before, and I'm somewhat bemused by section 9.1., which is a prayer. Is that a normal, usual or required part of such a complaint? Seems quite out of place to me.
Reading the document, all the five presented cases are the FBI cases, not NSA. They are also listed as the FISA cases. The title is intentionally misleading.
It's pretty outrageous you'd accuse me of this given that I'm responding to literal, textbook FUD with derision (the preferred mechanism for said things).

E.g., claiming that a google login is required is strictly false and has never been true. Claiming that Linux is not a realistic option when Linus Torvalds himself has a series of trivially searchable articles about why he wants to use a Chromebook Pixel as a dev machine.

Meanwhile, there is a publicly acknowledged and jointly-funded anti-Google ad campaign that's been running for several years. So we factually know that the counter-case (i.e., that there is a very high probability people are paid to write anti-google sentiments here) is actually the one receiving funding.

But again, why inject facts into marvellous diatribes.
Smallpox Vials Found In Unapproved Laboratory
Then you should also be giving chocolatey a good look before rejecting it out of hand. It's a good system, it works, and it has wide support. It may not be quite as popular as Steam, but rejecting it purely based on 'I don't know it' is short-sighted.
> Not my own security, but the security of the person who pays for the room.

Can a person decide for himself whether to stay with a government licenced business like a hotel or with someone who wants to rent him a room without any special permits from the government? Why are you deciding for that other person what is safe or not?

>I don't care about what people thinks is just or not. Taxes must be paid, because otherwise there would be no public services, such as healthcare or education. We rely on them.

And roads. You forgot, no one but government bureaucrats can build roads.

So, you don't care for what other people think is just, but you're absolutely okay with forcing your perceived conception of justice upon them by saying "it's unfair to hotels"? What makes you think your sense of fairness is better?

>You are free to open a hotel which follows the law but has lower prices

This is impossible because the permits I'd have to obtain and rules I'd have to comply with would raise prices.

>A very weird comparison you're pulling here. I won't even bother to respond to this...

Not weird at all. You said you can't go breaking a law if you simply disagree with it. I gave you an example of a law that many people break and asked you whether you would send them to jail for breaking it. If you stand by your principle, you'd have to do it.
The 7 steps of planning high converting landing pages
I tried it but it feels lagging on my system.
> It's a rental agreement, there's nothing fancy or new about it.

The novelty is increased utilization through sharing of what used to be exclusive.

Private property has a downside: it generally stands unused or underused when owner isn't using it or is only using it partially or temporarily. Sharing economy fixes this problem and allows society to extract value from the underutilized resources we already have. This increases availability and reduces prices of the services included in the sharing economy.
Yes, that's certainly an issue. In fact the "Try it" box also seems to work differently from the standard haskell live interpreter, in which you'd be able to define functions by prefixing them with 'let '.

If you still want to try it out, say

let sieve (p:xs) = p : sieve [x | x <- xs, x `mod` p /= 0] in sieve[2..]
Top 20 reasons for hair loss / hair fall
If there's no real appeal process, what reason is there for any MT employer to make any payouts at all? Honesty and not realising this about the system?
Meet the Muslim-American Leaders being covertly monitored
You had me at 'syntax'.

The fact that we're still typing crap into windows and calling advances along this one-dimensional path 'innovation' is pain.

Intentional[1] had a lot of promise but was too slow off the mark and now feels more like BPML, which has too much XML hiding under the covers to be good. As it stands, making solution development easier for business users has not had a broad impact on the overall productivity of developers.

'Blub' assumes existence on a continuum of language. It's a limiting concept in itself, as many of us have a different internal representation of thought.

It's sad to read about "python stuff for swift" or "haskell stuff for scala" when the only advantage of those exercises is as homework to understand the concepts.

[1] http://www.intentionalsoftware.com/
The Step-By-Step Guide To KickStarter Crowdfunding Success
That is an argument against literally every updater or automatic check for updates. It applies equally to Chocolatey and to any auto-updater they could have used for Atom. Please go back and find a better reason.
Stem cell treatment causes nasal growth in woman's back
It's what the plaintiff wants.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prayer_for_relief
I love the tutorial! I couldn't help writing down some notes while going through it, here they are if you're interested in reading:

- Really would love to return to previous steps to review things (for example, reviewing what the difference is between a list and a tuple)

- "You just passed the (+1) function to the map function." But didn't I also pass [1..5] to it too? It's unclear to me whether map is a function which takes two arguments ... or if the first part "map (+1)" evaluates to a function which acts on [1..5]

- Is a (+1) a tuple with one item (the function "+1") or is it just similar syntax?

- Really like the exercises and would love to have more challenges interspersing the intake of new content. It honestly feels like the best way to learn.

I'm going to sleep for the night, otherwise I'd keep going. I'll return to it later. Looks promising!

P.S. Mini-bug report: Somehow this happened and it really confused me https://i.cloudup.com/0wRJS7FZls.png - looks like my 'try it again anyways' strategy saved me here. (there were no js console errors).
This is not up to date.
About discoverability, when you start being a heavy user, the next step is to have custom entries in the user dictionary. It's almost mandatory for 2chan style smileys[0] with 7 or 8 characters in a row, and it also helps for obscure characters, emoji or not (there was a time "girl moji"[1] was a thing, with every letter splitted into 2 or 3 parts. I can't imagine that thing working without having all the letters in a user dictionary).

[0] http://matsucon.net/material/dic/kao01.html
[1] http://plaza.rakuten.co.jp/love2kaomoji/5007/
This is a good thing, because unless provision of anonymity is tested in court and shown to be legal and useful there's always the possibility that it's not protected by law and people will be in danger of getting sued or imprisoned if they make anonymising services. Far better to test it in court with a stupid revenge porn website than testing it with a case of, for example, a whistleblower where authorities feels they need to win. With some previous precedents set it'll make it far harder to argue that providers of anonymity are responsible or culpable when it actually matters.
538 predicted the winner in the group stage correctly in 28 of 48 matches. For teams advancing out of the group stage, they got 7 out of 16 right. Maybe the results were "predictable", but only if you assume that people actually making predictions for some reason took no advantage of that predictability.

(Source: http://www.sportingintelligence.com/2014/06/24/bankers-and-b...)
The Conduit I/O library that we're building in Mirage/OCaml allows the application to select which SSL transport layer implementation that it's linking with. Both Lwt_ssl (which binds to OpenSSL) and OCaml-TLS will be supported when it's released for exactly this reason. There's a blog post due about this next week.

As to your other complaint that OpenSSL "just works", note that numerous issues have been swept under the rug over the years (see the LibreSSL CVS logs for more pointers). I'd suggest reading this paper about the most dangerous code in the world for more background: http://crypto.stanford.edu/~dabo/pubs/abstracts/ssl-client-b...

So when you're using the Haskell library and running into bugs, think of the time you're spending bugfixing and filing patches as a little social tax that contributes to fixing an important technical issue that threatens the stability of the Internet if it's not comprehensively addressed.
New Species Found in an Everyday, Store-Bought Mushroom Packet
What about Braille readers and stuff like that? How well do they support javascript?
> The novelty is increased utilization through sharing of what used to be exclusive.

Sublet agreements existed for centuries before AirBNB came along. I have lived in sublets before people took the internet for something serious. The novelty is that AirBNB managed to provide a streamlined user experience and achieved a critical mass. The novelty about Uber is that is managed to create a second taxi market in the US. That's a feat in itself, but that's not a "sharing economy". It's certainly an efficiency gain, but hey - efficiency gains are abundant in all parts of the economy, that's nothing new.
That's the thing though. Because you have a ton of experience with C++, then you'd probably be able to pick up ruby, python quite quickly (if you don't know them already), because despite the superficial syntatic differences, their semantics are, in the grand scheme of things, close enough to those of C++. You'll trip up on some of the subtler differences, but you'll have a relatively easy time interpreting what the differences mean. When you first look at haskell, the underlying semantics are different enough that your prior experience scarcely helps you interpret the different syntax. Cue howls of frustration.
Subsistence farming is something that almost the entire world tries to get away from as soon as possible, because apart from the food it's near-total poverty.

Also, what land? There isn't a vast reserve of untapped productive land lying around. It's all owned (capital) by someone who won't want you farming on it.

The only humane approach to too many people is a low birthrate movement, which requires universal free contraception. Something which a lot of Americans don't want to see happen.
Of course it's Texas I men where else would it be...

I never considered Tor an ISP since their using their users connections to the internet which they have already payed for and are sharing for free but ok.

I would call it more of a social network where everybody is helping everybody else stay anonymous.

Tor project offer private and anonymous domain name hosting? Well technically maybe but not really... it's not like you can access .onion domains without installing Tor and if you do install Tor you're opting to be anonymous.

How does this work if a program is offering anything close to the domain to IP resolution used on the internet while preserving your anonymity within their ecosystem they are breaking the law?

It's a piece of software designed to preserve you privacy and anonymity of course everything in its ecosystem is going to do that and their going to advertize that.
> That's what I mean - most resources are shared.

Most resources are not shared. In the old economy only special classes of resources designated to provide a service used to be shared, e.g. taxis and hotels. Now thanks to sharing economy we can (in principle) share every private car on the road and every room in every building.

> It's a cold-hearted business transaction

Most business transactions I did were warm-hearted. It's a different discussion, but I think most people honestly want to provide a good service and make the other person happy. It sounds like you may have encountered real jerks out there.

Business does not preclude care, sharing or community.
Almost, I'm from Ireland.

I hadn't noticed the wider use of singular groups previously, but that does make sense when you point it out. I suppose it was just more obvious because we rarely see american analysis of football outside of the world cup.
Mysterious Earthen Rings Predate Amazon Rainforest
10 ways to damage your fast-growing tech startup
it all depends on your objective. it can be user acquisition or customers. if customers then b2c or b2b? in geofrey moore's world, is your product a category or still very innovative? depending on this - maybe you can arrive at a tactic
I would appreciate something more advanced than a PIN though. I currently use TeamViewer and I use unique, randomly generated passwords for each node. Downgrading to 4-6 digits doesn't feel very comfortable.

Or perhaps Google could make sure that the PIN also requires a second two part authentication. I mean, the account should already be protected by that in theory, but if someone stumbles upon an active session and the PIN is lying around, at least they'll be stopped by the two part auth.
So whats next, sue "The Internet" for there are websites like the pirate bay ? Did I get the anology right ?
The real reason behind this fine is the heavy lobbying from the big Hotel companies in Spain, they are specially making this pressure at a local government level, as they are going to be the regulators (The new renting law differentiates between short and long term, and gives the regulation powers to the Comunidades Autonomas).

Neighbors horror stories like the ones we´ve been seeing in NY, don´t seem to be as big a factor in this. Still it happens, mainly in the big cities like Barcelona and Madrid, were some flat owners are having problems with the guests of their neighbors. But I´m not aware that the neighbors are too vocal (I´ll gladly be corrected about this).

The Hotel lobby is seeing how a big chunk of their business is going to the share economy and they are afraid.

In Mallorca where I live, most AirBnB offerings are mostly for summer apartments and homes (not at the city), so there is little problem with neighbors (who mostly want to do the same). People of course see AirBnB as a way to keep low the costs of owning a summer apartment (renting the weeks they are not going to use it). This is specially interesting to those who are trapped on high Mortgages from the bubble, as it´s providing them another income source. People who inherited or bought before 2004 are seeing mostly profits, and if you are lucky (and dedicated) you are able to make money of it.

So far the legal status in Mallorca is good, as you can register your apartment for season renting only paying a yearly fare per bed to be rented. But they are certainly receiving heat by the lobbys and this could change any moment.

I guess that the best move by AirBnB is to start selling this local governments the advantages of AirBnB:

-to improve the usage of the empty apartment stock (that eventually increases the plummeted property prices)
-Putting money on the hands of the people who more needs it.
-Not a killing competitor to hotels, while certain % of clients will move to AirBnB, not all people wants to go to apartments (even less if they are privately owned), for they vacations. It´s a similar concept to the low cost companies, they increase the total traffic, and the total business for the area, it´s not only the same passengers traveling cheaper.

Don´t need to be all local government, just 2 or 3 of the most touristic ones like Baleares, Canarias, Valencia, Cataluña. Once one starts making AirBnB friendly regulations (and selling them as an advantage for the government itself), most of the rest will follow.
Which noone claimed to begin with.
The defendants, which apparently are not residents of Texas, will probably exercise their statutory right to "remove" [1] this lawsuit, so that instead of the case being heard in the Texas state court in Denton, it'll be in the federal court in Dallas [2].

We can expect the defendants to move to dismiss the case on the merits, on grounds that their conduct is protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act [3]. Whether they'll succeed is another question, especially as to Pinkmeth, and Tor might have an uphill battle as well.

We can also expect the defendants to move to dismiss on procedural grounds -- they will claim that they don't have enough contact with Texas to be properly subject to suit there (here) [4]. That too will probably be the subject of "satellite" litigation in pre-trial motion practice.

This won't be an inexpensive exercise for the defendants, just in terms of legal fees.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Removal_jurisdiction

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District_Court_fo...

[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230_of_the_Communicatio...

[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_jurisdiction
>Maybe you could use this handy open source Chrome extension

And how exactly does that help me when a gmail user emails me (or replies to my email) without using pgp? Perhaps you meant to say "Maybe you could persuade every person you might ever contact over email to use this obscure Chrome extension".

If you think this is a solution then you have massively misunderstood the problem. Communication is an issue of social groups. What matters is what most people are doing. The choices made by any individual are irrelevant unless most other people do the same. I know that is probably difficult to fit into your existing individualistic model of how the world works.
I am far from being an expert but I think the most common thing to do is to just take on the surname of the parent as a sort of family name. So if Björk's father was John Smith then she would be Björk Smith. Family names are not unheard of and there are even a few Icelandic ones (although they are definitely the exception). Name laws in Iceland are really strict[0] but they mostly regard peoples "given name". I think you actually get to choose the surname of your child. I have seen cases where people have gone with the "-son" or "-dóttir" formula, typically in cases where the foreign name has an Icelandic counterpart, e.g. "John" and the Icelandic "Jón". The surname of the child could then be either "Johnson" or "Jónsson".

[0]: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/26/iceland-strict-...
> Future

> Doesn't support gradients

yeah, nah
Yes, you shouldn't do this. ;) In this case "Bein" (or in the long form "Gebein") is an outdated term for bone or skeleton.

"Elfenbein" is the modern word for ivory. The meaning of Elf is somewhat similar (though not identical) to English and therefore refers to the perceived beauty of ivory.

A tusk on the other hand is called "Stoßzahn" recognizing it as a tooth ("Zahn").
> "Some of the goals that Brazil keeper Julio Cesar conceded were unavoidable, but he was not exactly Tim Howard in goal." (elsewhere)

There's another plural/singular one. It would more likely be 'in goals', or more colloquially, 'in sticks'.

> the use of "tie" instead of "draw"

That reminds me of another one, how the score is communicated. Americans say something like 'Germany won seven to one', I'd say 'Germany won seven one'. This then gets quite confusing for Gaelic football where we say things like 'Mayo won three twelve to one seven' (3 goals and 12 points to 1 goal and seven points)
A Different Path to Fighting Addiction