skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Plenty. It's very clearly intended to restrict the exact kinds of regulations that national governments would put into effect to clamp down on too big to fail institutions.

The kind that required humungous bailouts and are STILL taking outsized risks because the regulatory framework is still insufficient to prevent them from causing yet more systemic crises.
Ah, so you mean a formal language spec, not an informal one.

Edit: I forgot to mention that both Go and Java lack ECMA and ISO specs.
Odds are that you registered over plain HTTP anyway
Eg on Debian: apt-get install libblocksruntime0 libblocksruntime-dev

http://compiler-rt.llvm.org/
... and just as Euclidean geometry, nobody actually uses it, and it is a controversial matter whether it is a good teaching tool [1].

It's elegant, but elitist, because it's unnecessarily difficult and hostile.

[1]: http://mathoverflow.net/questions/152352/is-euclid-dead
It's also much easier for them to propose a series of trade-offs and concessions that primarily benefit their rich donors/friends rather than their electorates.
I've seen it done three ways on Android:

* A link in the app to an "Unlocker" which is detected by the main app and removes the ads

* An IAP that removes the ads

* A pro vs free version of the app.

I can't answer your question directly but I know that the IAP is a few lines of code in Google's billing APIs.
I disagree with you. I don't think that what you presented actually answers the points I've made except to rationalize why the models are completely wrong.

Let me is simplify things. Is there a model based on CO2 that explains the variations in global surface temperature of the last 1200-5000 years, as mentioned in the OP's article? That should be easier to project given that we are not talking about a period of 20 years, correct? I genuinely don't know, which is why I'm asking and I would like to learn more. Is there a model that projects the various ice ages and subsequent warmings over a longer period of time, including the medieval warming period, which you claim should be easier?

And a question for you: what evidence would you personally require in order to no longer in the greenhouse gas theory? I know what I need to see in order to start to believe in the greenhouse gas theory: I need to understand how CO2 is responsible for the variability of the Earth's climate pre-industrial revolution. If CO2 wasn't responsible for the Earth's climate change pre-industrial revolution, then what was it and could that same thing be responsible what for we see today?

What I've seen from people who believe this theory is that they will believe it no matter what. For example, if climate gets warmer, that's because of CO2. If the climate gets colder, that's because of CO2. If the climate goes wild, like during the time of hurricane Katrina, that's because of CO2. If it gets calmer, like it did after Katrina, that's because of CO2. I can't think of a single climate outcome that will disprove the theory, since all outcomes appear to prove it.

In my experience, a theory that can't be prove wrong despite different outcomes isn't a theory, it's a religious statement, which is not science. I believe that believers in the theory have moved over into the religious territory, which makes it about as fruitful as talking to a creationist.
I sit corrected. I'm currently having lots of trouble building the game because my cross compiler doesn't match the name of yours in the makefiles.

> make[2]: arm-linux-gnueabi-as: Command not found
http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-uni...

If you discount England's outsize performance, you go a long way before you leave American dominance.
On the other hand, if the competition is with other leagues, where is the cartel?

Maybe the problem is lack of competition in the market. It isn't easy to turn a basketball fan into a football or ice hockey fan, for example.
For good measure you should list websites allowing you to enter a password on a non-https page, too. That's plain text, too.
Do you know where/if I can I find that data/chart on the NWS site? The author says NWS deserves credit for not holding anything back but for some reason I can not find that data on the NWS web sites.
It's the number of days later than the core Eclipse project that the project is expected to integrate with a milestone or release candidate. It seems to relate to a project's need for some time to test against their dependent projects.

I found this information at http://wiki.eclipse.org/SimRel/Overview .
Can be handy to download youtube videos, but the idea that it has something to do with liberty is ludicrous.
I wrote something similar a few months back https://github.com/MikeRogers0/justdelete.me-chrome-extensio... for Just Delete Me, though they offered a nice JSON file for me to use.
You could just copy the Hacker News / Reddit system for the comments? It seems to work pretty well in general.
so you have over 1.5 hours potentially of people hanging around waiting for the meeting to set the days priority's.

From a time and motion perspective Better to do it at the end of the day so that you can be productive from the get go.
From a comment further down https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/plain-text-offende...
On servers and especially on virtualized servers it is absolutely not.
I am a Digital Ocean customer and the only password they've ever emailed me is the root password for the server I just bought. Arguably this isn't as safe as AWS' process of making you download a kaypair and only letting you login with that. However, VPS owners should get in the habit of logging on to any server they buy and immediately disabling password auth and root login via SSH, which helps negate the root password being sent over email issue to a certain extent.
I think all that things are considered investment in the future by Bezos. Amazon will probably eclipse Apple, Microsoft, Google etc in 5-10 years.
>> None of these leagues’ playoff tournaments have overlapping dates.

H
The NHL doesn't exist? Their playoffs happen alongside the NBA's
It's not the same but there are other security issues. The server to server transfer of the email message might not be encrypted (it might be if both have TLS extensions enabled). So, emailing plain text passwords is always a bad idea even if it's not stored as such.
[Edit]: added comment on Mozilla Persona.

I would disagree. It's common knowledge (backed by many A/B tests) that shorter sign-up forms see less traffic drop. So, if OAuth can replace a number of things (name, email, password, email verification, and so on) by a couple of clicks, I as a website owner will be very happy. Also, when sending interesting emails to inactive users, I see quite a few come back but drop again after a few unsuccessful login attempts. Again, OAuth will help.

The reasons website owners (at least I) don't use facebook or google's OAuth are following:

1. They brand their service too much. The button itself says Login with Facebook/Google. I don't want my users' mind share to be consumed by them. Everything from login/logout to account management happens on pages in the context of their brand. Browser/OS providing this service is much less problematic, and even they should have pluggable services for replacing their default implementations, just like the ability to change the default browser on any OS.

2. They own the data and not the user. I have faced an incident in the past where one of my games was blocked by facebook because they thought it was gambling. I lost 95% of my users in one stroke. It took me two weeks haggling with FB to get my game whitelisted again. Still, the damage was done and we could never fully recover. The data must be owned by the end user and stored in open format so that user can take it freely from one place to another, just like I can take my contacts in vCard format to wherever I like.

3. Any such solution (especially when so heavily branded) will naturally turn other big players hostile. for example, facebook and google will have their own separate implementations instead of having a common one. This will almost ensure that standardization will hot take place. One button each for signup with Facebok/Google/LinkedIn/OpenID/... doesn't make for great UX and it's unnecessary overhead for website owners.

Mozilla persona is a good initiative. Hope they prefer standardization over trying to use it to promote their own browser.
Well, it was a bit of a hunch, based on the slowness of development. Other commenters have maybe given better explanations.
Amazon MWS, their horrible piece of an API.
If I were to give someone an example of a bad API it would be Amazon MWS, because it has everything:

-XML only (which is often strucured in the most obscure ways, and inconsistent through the API)

-shared reqeust throttling across all authorized applications (which turns the API from "barely useful" to "I can be lucky if I get a valid response")

-inconsistent across all marketplaces (of course I can't use the "fullfilmentLatency" attribute on the US-marketplace like in the rest of the world)

-unreliable (yeah Amazon, just ignore the list of prices I just sent you and mark them as processed, I am used to it)

That and many more things(e.g. hiding competitors in the responses) makes the API so useless that many people resort to just scraping the Amazon pages. An API that is so bad that nobody uses it is almost as bad as none at all.

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to rage but seeing that Amazon treats 3rd party developers and merchants like shit while doing everything to make the customers happy always makes my blood boil.
It happens, but way too little.
I disagree comprehensively.

First, there isn't really such a thing as a generic "expectation of privacy". There is not just "public" and "private", it really is all about necessity and consequences, about who needs to know what and what the potential consequences (good and bad) are when somebody gets to know something about you. If I walk around outside, I don't consider it a violation of my privacy if people don't close their eyes in order to avoid seeing me. Yet, I would very much consider it a violation of my privacy if someone started following me with an HD camera (maybe even streaming it to the internet?), even though they are just "doing something else with the information encoded in the electromagnetic waves reflected from my outside into the public sphere". Or if someone started pointing medical diagnosis equipment at me in public in order to figure out from that same "public informaton" stuff that I very much might consider private. A black-and-white distinction between "public" and "private" information is useless, as there is no such thing - not every personally identifiable information is either not to be shared with anyone or good for printing in the newspaper, most of it is somewhere in between: One expects it to not be a secret, but still to only be shared and used within limits for some sensible reason and purpose. So, I expect my doctor to share my medical info with his assistants as needed, but not to publish it in a book, I expect the info on the outside of letters I send and receive to be read and used by the postal service and people working there for delivering them, but not for publishing a list of my correspondence in the newspaper - and that very much for privacy reasons.

Secondly, the simplest reason for why mass collection itself can be a violation of privacy is that there is information in the collection that is not in the individual datum, that is to say, information that only becomes recognizable once you look at the collection as a whole with the right tools. From a single letter, you cannot construct a social graph of a society, but from all the letter meta data, you most certainly can.

Another angle to look at it from is to think about it in epistomological terms: Do you think that the work of scientists increases the knowledge of humankind? After all, they are just using "public information" (observations of nature, that is) and transforming it into usable theories about the world. I would think that that work makes a huge difference in terms of the use of that "public information" by humans and the effects of that use, which is why I would say that they are increasing our knowledg. The collection and analysis of personally identifiable "public information", I would argue, has the same effect on the knowledge of the party collecting and analyzing the data about the people that this information is about, namely, they are gaining knowledge about those people as a result of that collection and analysis, and if that knowledge is something that I consider private, I might as well call this investigation a violation of my privacy.
The Australian system is like an interest-free loan that you don't have to make repayments on until you earn above a certain threshold. The government gets the same return from a student making $60k as one making $1m through the scheme.

(Currently the amount you owe is indexed with inflation. At the moment the federal government is trying to change it to accrue interest at the bond rate (3.8%-6% rather than 2%-3%) and reduce the income level before you have to start making repayments, but it's unlikely they will be able to get the votes to get this through the senate.)
Mundial Matchday – FIFA World Cup iPad App with Match Video Highlights
It's extremely useful for argument-dependant lookup[0]. If a and b are "uint64_t" and not "std::uint64_t" then "swap(a,b)" won't work in a generic fashion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument-dependent_name_lookup
If that would happen as you say, wouldn't it create a self-perpetuating cycle where you couldn't make repayments once you lost a job, because you couldn't get another one?
Looks quite nice, but doesn't appear that you have had time to make it much mobile friendly?

Is it feature complete otherwise?
>For example, a search for the word mars generates about 207 million matches. That would find pages that have the exact word plus pages that might not have the word but are deemed related to it.

>Searching for mars surrounded by quotes — “mars” — generates exactly the same number, even though that number should drop.

As far as I know, that number is just an estimate, and is wildly inaccurate for the actual amount of results. It's the same reason you could have a search with 10 pages of results shown at first, but after you get to page 3, you only see 4 pages of results. It just estimates it until in needs a more accurate count.

I can't find the original source for this, though I didn't spend much time looking, but found this on stackoverflow[0]:

>From a Google developer (Matt Cutts, head of the web spam team):

>"We try to be very clear that our results estimates are just that--estimates. In theory we could spend cycles on that aspect of our system, but in practice we have a lot of other things to work on, and more accurate results estimates is lower on the list than lots of other things"

[0] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4397292/how-does-google-c...

Edit:formatting
Looking at this project, I feel very very very dumb. I've been using computers for 2 decades and programming for 1 and I can't even imagine doing something like this!
Why isn't there a downvote button here?
Wolfram Language Introduction for Programmers
Oh, yes, you're right. Orthogonality isn't at issue here, the decomposition is just being used for sorting/ranking/re-weighting.

Thanks for pointing out the muddle i was in there.
Jesus Christ dude, you're missing the point completely.

Read the comment I originally responded to.
> as using them is barely above plain text in terms of security these days

How so?
List of my most frequently played Spotify tracks that I've fav'ed while coding. Mostly discovered through Spotify radio.

Action Bronson - Shiraz
Feed Me - Rat Trap
Gammer + Whizzkid - We Killed the Rave
Michael Woods - Flash Hands
Robyn - Hang With Me (Acoustic)
ATB - 9pm (Till I Come)
K-391 - Electro House 2012
You Blocked Me on Facebook - Internet Friends
Groove Coverage - 21st Century Digital Girl
Vinylshakerz - One Night in Bangkok
Tantrum Desire - Reach VIP
Kdrew - Bullseye
Pegboard Nerds - Razor Sharp
Disclosure - You & Me - Flume Remix
Todd Terje - Inspector Norse
Flight Facilities - Crave You
Friendly Fires - Paris
Chromeo - Jealous (From the Google Watch ad)
Flux Pavilion - Freeway

And for fun:

The Chainsmokers - #SELFIE
The Teenagers - Homecoming

Playlist:
http://open.spotify.com/user/1235363762/playlist/4OkN4iv5XBt...
Just curious: What is this hacking technique called? seems to be some kind of JS injected redirection.
When I was a kid I used to love listening to black and death metal. In these genres of music the vocalists do not... sing but more like growl or yell which makes deciphering the lyrics very difficult.

But after reading the lyrics first then you can make sense what they 're saying without a problem.

If you 're looking for such "audio illusions" try it yourself :)
What is supposed to happen? Seems to be some article...
This is what smartphones were made for.
I am seeing the expected Reuters article. Mind explaining what is supposed to happen when loading this page?
But the rythm pattern is identical, of course your breain will regognize that, and to prove that point to you, overlay your recording and the gibberish.
Anybody have any idea about how they did it? Sorry for the noob question but I can't really figure out how they did it, since the original page loads fine and only after this there's some kind of redirect.

And as I can see it only affects certain pages so maybe there's a compromised component that's loaded on those pages?
It's fixed now. It was linking to http://sea.sy/indexs/
If I recall right, those functions are too fast. It is too easy to iterate through all kinds of possible passwords and you are likely to find plenty of matches.

At minimum, you need to add unique salt to each password. It forces the attacker to run dictionary on each account separately. It is also recommended to use different slower hash function or iterate MD5/SHA1 thousands times, so he will be much slower.
Unlikely hit app Yo is 'hacked' by students
Welcome onboard.
If you are a news junkie - 'Feedly' & 'Instagram' are for you and if you often get reading time without internet, 'Pocket' is for you.
Photo-editing Aviary, Photo-Sharing Instagram, Flickr.
Zomato for finding hotels.
Tell your interest so we can suggest based on that.
Have you considered that correlation may not equal causation? Specifically, that funding model and performance may not necessarily be causally linked?
I think "Fregna" would have been a better name.
I thought the point was the opposite of that. Something along the lines of : "in the psst men worked and provided money to their wife and children. If they didn't they were morally suspect. Now, in communities where there is no hope of work, men should spend some of their time on the non-paid work required to raise children."
We have a few of those :)
No action by Google yet? They are using Adsense and it probably violates Adsense TOC!
There is a big difference between something not being a secret and something being public. It is not a simple dual option.
We've covered length limits before (and entered it into our mandate), since those limits are many times created by placing the password into a fixed-width field in the database.
Russian checkpoint on Ukraine
Russian checkpoint on Ukraine border comes under fire | RAW FOOTAGE
The website has ugliest TOS page : http://offliberty.com/tos/
Generally not a good idea to link directly to a hacked page.

There's a bit of code injected into the page near the bottom:

document.write("<SCR"+"IPT TYPE='text/javascript' SRC='" + "http" + (window.location.protocol.indexOf('https:')==0?'s':'') + "://js.revsci.net/gateway/gw.js?csid=I07714' CHARSET='ISO-8859-1'"+"><\/SCR"+"IPT>");

js.revsci.net seems to be redirecting some requests to localhost, so the code isn't loading for everyone. If it loads for you, you get redirected to a big "hacked by the Syrian Electronic Army etc. etc." page.

The location of the code doesn't look like it was from a malicious ad or social media thingy. Looks like it's near the bottom of the page template, so that's neat. It's embedded in other unrelated articles too.

edit: I was able to retrieve the content from elsewhere. It's up at http://pastebin.com/rzPeKKMH -- it's not just doing a redirect, there's some funky stuff in there.
That sounds lovely! Can you help us either in making it or recommending someone who might be able to?
I agree that from a security standpoint it's better not to send the password in plain text at all.

But then you can start listing non-HTTPS sites, too. You disclose your password in plaintext to many servers every time you login on those.
Looks interesting I'll check it out!
Excellent link and now I'm a fan of Katie Melua (not her music just her for having the humour to redo her song).
You should be sending a token and/or reset link which will allow the user to choose a new password.

This is much better than just sending a new password because:

* It can have a TTL.

* The user has to change it, they can't just keep using the plaintext one forever.

* You can perform some kind of verification, was the request for a new password sent from the same country/IP/device as the person generating a new password.
It seems that Reuters has rectified the problem now. Previously it was redirecting to a page hosted by the Syrian Electronic Army.

Also a reminder to not link directly to hacked pages but to perhaps a screenshot and put the real link in the comments, as we don't know if there could be malicious javascript et al injected into the page.
An explanation on the site of what it actually does would be helpful.
How would one gather that information? What form of evidence would you accept?

We'd like to refrain from asking people to hack into sites just to figure out their hashing scheme :)
I'd rather have an app that screens all the other moviegoers so that I can arrange to sit in an area where I'm not surrounded by people who have some kind of Pavlovian response that 'movie' = 'feed my face with crunchy popcorn, slurpy drinks and sweets from a noisy plastic bag'.

People: You will not die if you go without carbs for a couple of hours.
Injecting tags and JS scripts in to a page usually falls in to the XSS category of attacks although it is not clear how it was done in this particular case.
This and the linked "you can't unsee article" are great example of how our perception is very far from a direct representation of the world, and instead is the end result of a complex processing happening inside our brain.

Another example of the same effect (although here actually there _is_ no real message) can be heard in songs when listened to in reverse (for example see [1]). One lesson to learn might be: be wary of our brain recognizing patters, it tends to err on the side of seeing patterns when there are none. I would argue that religion and superstition are examples of this.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlvFkws9PYY
I've never been a google+ basher, but I really hated Google dropping the + search operator. It also showed me in a very personal way just how lazy users can be: Wrapping a word in double quotes is "just" 4 keystrokes instead of 1 for the + in front of it, but I effectively stopped using that feature after the change.
"instruction set" would be more precise.

There isn't a single ARM instruction set, as it is with x86, for exmple. There are many different versions of it. Sometimes there are even significant variations within a family. e.g. Cortex M0 lacks many useful instructions that are only available in the M3/M4.
New York City taxi trips
I'm sorry I typed 'google' in the input bar... it gave me an error saying I should put a blahblah url. I have no clue what this thing is :)
I pee right before a movie starts. I try my best not to have any soda during the movie for this very reason. Still, sometimes, I have to go. You realize that bladders get naturally weaker for some individuals as they age right?