skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"During the behavior-evaluation exercise, people with high justice sensitivity showed more activity than average participants in parts of the brain associated with higher-order cognition. Brain areas commonly linked with emotional processing were not affected.

The conclusion was clear, Decety said: “Individuals who are sensitive to justice and fairness do not seem to be emotionally driven. Rather, they are cognitively driven.”"

While this is a very interesting study, that conclusion does not follow from the previous paragraph. I'd even bet that specific claim is not made in the original paper but was convenient to state in a non-peer-reviewed news story.

fMRI studies are extremely easy to perform and, frankly, if you put someone in a brain scanner bits of the brain will light up. I know this because my PhD was on the topic of human emotion and decision-making and I used fMRI (as well as PET). I'm going to skim the paper now and see if my earlier statement holds up.

EDIT: As I suspected, their claim is not made (even slightly) in the peer-reviewed work. I still find the study interesting but I see flaws in the study design as there isn't an attempt at a baseline condition which (imho) is important for any claims about emotional processing.
> Are APL's typically JITed ?

No.
What problems does RDF solve that:

1. Does exist in the real world and are not just data theoretical research problems?

2. Aren't already solved by more mature and widely accepted tools?
Every day that goes by I am more convinced that the Twitter stream is the best way to communicate, as a brand and as a consumer. On Twitter, as in Facebook, I follow/like whatever brands I find interesting, engaging and resonate with my believes/interests. If I see that a brand does/say something I don't like, I simply unfollow/unlike.

What Facebook is doing is (over)engineering how my relationship with brands/people are, and I don't like that. If I like Robert Scoble on Facebook it is because I want to see what he has to say, and my like should not just be another stat on on Scoble's total number of followers. Hence, my use of Twitter is significantly higher than that on FB. Facebook is digging itself into a big hole.
Wayland in Gnome 3.12, and beyond
So, not to risk showing me a link again, they prefer to show me nothing at all? That's a pretty awful tradeoff.
Silly post. Facebook is a business. Just like in Costco, you don't get free samples forever. At some point you need to buy the bagel bites to get full at home.
Just in case anyone is interested, Unicomp is still selling APL-keyboards and keys (for Model-Ms). http://pckeyboard.com
How do you find these clients? I ve done this kind of work arrangement, and like it, but replicating this kind of arrangement doesnt seem to be so easy, at least to me.
GlobalSign: Free wildcard SSL certificates for open source projects
Facebook does the same thing. I got a notice about an application I published years ago in March:

> Security Notice - Your App Secret

> We see that your app, XYZ, is embedding the Facebook integration’s App Secret inside the Android Play Store app bundle for your app. This is a serious vulnerability that violates our published recommendations for proper login security. Someone with access to the app secret for your app can act on behalf of the app - this includes changing configurations for the app, accessing some types of information associated with people who have granted permissions to the app, and posting on behalf of those people.

> To mitigate this sizable risk, we have reset the app secret for your app. If your app is mobile-only, this should not cause any issues. If it has a server-side component, there is a greater likelihood that it has caused some issues for your app that you will need to address. Going forward, please do not include the app secret in your app bundle, or disclose it publicly. You can read more about app secrets and how to secure your Facebook app here.
Speed is not why React is great. It's great because it's so unbelievably simple (conceptually) and does what it does robustly and clearly.
There are actually a lot of people that doubted me, some very close to me, and above all, myself. I have had positive reactions in the past, but you never know when people might be "over" your work. There is no feeling quite like seeing people light up when you reveal something that you have poured your life into, and that feeling is multiplied by the inverse of your confidence.

joy = timeSpent * positiveReaction * (1.0-selfConfidence) :)
I'm in DC as well, and you're right about all the "beltway bandits" as we like to call them.

But, there are plenty of wealthy beltway bandits who are willing to make investments. You just have to approach them a big differently.
Yes, of course, it is on the plan.
Can you explain why it does not follow instead of just putting not in italics for all the non-psychology PhD's in the crowd?
The point you are missing: this business considers itself to be a content creator and value adder, and they do that because Facebook has previously encouraged that. Now Facebook are saying that they don't care how compelling your content is, if you are commercial in any way, you have to pay. That's not how a social network is meant to work.
How to Write Drivers?
What are the basics what a programmer should know for writing drivers?
This is not some OS specific, but in general what are things we should know?
I am have just started with hardware learning and stuff and I am not sure which OS I Should start with, So I am willing to learn about the common thing in all OS.
Paying for the Party
Of course you do. You can't legally be fired for saying, "I am a member of the Republican Party." Your political views (and that's what, in the end, this is) are protected, not when they are shared by everyone, but specifically when they are not.

Listen, I get where you're coming from. This is an important issue for me too. (As an aside: I have spent an inordinate amount of time working with one of the world's largest human rights organizations, including time on the board of directors for one of its structures.) I like and appreciate your passion to fight the good fight.

But! Be careful when you reach into your toolbag to fight that fight. The ends never justify the means. If we violate one person's rights by trying to protect another person's rights, we'll descend into chaos.

Always be respectful that in 7+ billion people, we're going to have a lot of opinions.

We must stop behaviors that are directly harmful. But we must always also protect people's opinions.

They're important. You have the freedom to believe whatever you want to believe. The minute that opinion crosses into a behavior -- boom! You can drop the ax. People have the right to any opinion but not any behavior. Do you see? If Brendan wants to donate money to a bill that would do x, he can. If he punishes an employee because they're x, that's wrong. (And you cannot jump in and say, "He will have a behavior because of his opinion.")

The way to handle this is to respect his opinion and be on guard that no behavior follows from it. Period. Put that important passion instead into educating and enlightening the populace. Put it into doing positive work.

Forcing Brendan to step down because he donated money to a legitimate political proposition is witch-hunting and shameful. This issue deserves better than that.
Please correct your second query, asking for the A RR of "youtube.com\@4.2.2.2." is needlessy wrong
> I settled on a PocketBook

Interesting. Which model?
Microsoft overtakes Amazon to become the largest hosting company
A bit surprised not to see Google in that list.
On the plus side, 90% of the credit goes to the person with the idea.
Sorry, should have mentioned that.

It's a commandline JSON parser.

http://stedolan.github.io/jq/
I've had this thought as well. I would love to see Github add support for a previous/next button when viewing a commit to make the experience seamless.

The trouble is, for many projects claiming to start from scratch, the "Initial commit" includes hundreds or thousands of lines of code. The practicality of learning this way is very much dependent on the author/committer making digestible, incremental commits and maintaining a linear history.
> Facebook has concealed the profiles of anyone on the social network who used the same email and password combination as those exposed after the recent Adobe hack

http://www.zdnet.com/facebook-mines-adobe-breach-data-for-re...

Facebook at that point had a huge incentive to avoid those accounts from being taken over by spammers.
Hide my ass will do a good job here..
For some reason fMRI terrifies me in the sense that it will be misused to predict human behavior. The idea that we can effectively read your brain leads to the assumption that we can understand the behaviors, and I think that is false.
> We can make custom hardware, not rely on the scraps of the mobile phone industry. That is insanely expensive, think hundreds of millions of dollars. More news soon.
- Palmer [1]

[1]- http://www.reddit.com/r/oculus/comments/21cy9n/the_future_of...
Also a good explanation of Singapore under Lee Kuan Yew
I can confirm NS lookup to Google DNS, when done using the national cable ISP network, returns spoofed results.

here: http://i.imgur.com/jfZS31C.png
They have a heroku buildpack https://github.com/hhvm/heroku-buildpack-hhvm

That's not quite "shared host easy", but it's still pretty easy to get up and running on heroku if you know what you are doing.
Ooops, missed a space there. Fixed, thanks!
"It's been observed many times that those who have the best appreciation for how a product works are those who use it directly, and secondly, those who either service it or support those using it."

Thanks for the book reference. Similar observations by Lave and Wenger in a more academic style

http://infed.org/mobi/jean-lave-etienne-wenger-and-communiti...

I do think you have a blog post here as others have suggested.
Yup. So it's as "simple" as building a product that's notable enough to be worth a Wikipedia page.
However, to improve things further, we provided an over-the-air software update a few months ago to increase the default ground clearance of the Model S at highway speeds, substantially reducing the odds of a severe underbody impact.

This is the most crazy thing about the press release and I feel like it went largely unnoticed. Not that it is a bad thing at all but it really illustrates that we're totally living in a different world than what I grew up with. Cars are now largely defined by software.
Space Jam an intact web site from 1996
It's not about showing you the link or not, it's the implementation leaking out. A bunch of different user actions generate new fnids (one place you see them is in the 'more' urls) and there is only space set aside on the server for some limited number of them.
I am bit surprised to see both Palantir and Factual missing b/c 1. they are doing interesting work, and 2. they probably spend a pretty penny on PR.
Although Walmart in their lawsuit against Visa for fees pointed out that Visa is slowing the adoption of security features in the US. http://www.foxbusiness.com/industries/2014/03/27/wal-mart-fi...
The number of valid EC2 keys you can find with a simple GitHub search is mind-blowing (or was, at least, when I tried it a month ago).
It says it works via FastCGI, so you should be able to use any web server you want.

edit: Seeing as how Flask is Python, and HHVM is for PHP, you may have some trouble there.
Yup. Benevolent in this case has nothing to do with the person's personal treatment of others, and everything to do with the person being willing to serve the company/state rather than herself. The conventional dictators in failed states simply extract as much value as they can, at the expense of everyone else. A benevolent dictator uses her power to advance the cause. The way she does it might be suspect, even unethical or wrong, but there's no denying that it's to further the cause rather than selfishly extract-and-dump.
There have been a few mentions of this both in videos and posts. Here's a relevant bit from a post by Palmer Luckey on Reddit:

http://www.reddit.com/r/oculus/comments/21cy9n/the_future_of...

>We can make custom hardware, not rely on the scraps of the mobile phone industry. That is insanely expensive, think hundreds of millions of dollars. More news soon.

http://www.reddit.com/r/oculus/comments/21lu33/introducing_m...

>You are right that screens with big lenses in front of your eyes is essentially a brute force design, a design that relies on utilizing the scraps of the mobile phone industry to provide a good VR experience at the cost of performance and form factor. Doing better requires insane resources, which we now have.
SSH tunneling also works. It's cheap and easy to set up.
Ask PG: Applying second time, why is the application url up after deadline
Just a question I was wondering both the times. Is it something technical or are you being generous :)
The Brutal Ageism of Silicon Valley
It sounds like a lowball offer to me if it is really that profitable. But can you scale it further is the question.
They (or someone working with them) would have had to download the app and inspect it. They clearly tell me that they've detected access credentials in the app itself.

That's not conjecture.
DNSCrypt – encrypted DNS resolvers
Now this is interesting. Could we imagine a service that would be in charge of protecting your customers secrets?

You would provide a list of secret strings, and ask to have them monitored on search engines but also from mobile applications, browser extensions, published JARs etc.
Linus demoing Linux in 1998 on ScreenSavers(ZDTV)
Save files to S3.
There's a reason that Twitter and Google label things as sponsored ads. It's because when you are providing a service, there is a direct conflict of interest between your user experience and your ad sales. If you don't draw a line between advertising and organic content, then you severely risk degrading the content your user receives, and it doesn't matter whether you think you are or not (clearly Facebook thinks it can toe this line), but as soon as users perceive that the content they are receiving is more payola than popular then you've killed the golden goose.
Yeah, tried that. It's really slow most of the time, plus many websites will warn you or delay you (Google will display a message). Plus I wouldn't trust my data going through those machines.

As I said, I much rather get my own hosting (even shared hosting) for as cheap as 4 bucks a month, and tunnel my traffic through that machine.

But HMA is a valid solution for someone who's not willing to pay.
In both cases, Program A is NOT equivalent to Program B. Program A is missing the vital information that there are 60,000 people in total.
Very good point, and very much validated by this story, which in my opinion borders on the silly, but isn't all that different from the breathless descriptions of the Hermès ateliers in Paris where artisans stitch 10,000 € leather bags:

http://www.fastcompany.com/3028039/whats-the-perfect-shade-o...
Can you do a traceroute to 8.8.4.4? If it's actually reaching Google's network, then yeah, they're doing deep packet inspection on DNS traffic. If not, they're probably just routing 8.8.4.4 to a DNS server they control.

If their goal is to manipulate traffic to www.youtube.com (probably to block access to certain videos), another solution would be for YouTube to require SSL for all connections coming from Turkish IPs. Of course, this wouldn't work if they got some Turkish (or other) CA to sign a bogus www.youtube.com certificate.

EDIT: As lawl points out, trying to require SSL on www.youtube.com won't work either, since they could just do an sslstrip type attack.

EDIT 2: Proof that they are in fact messing with routes to Google Public DNS anycast addresses (they're doing to same to OpenDNS): https://twitter.com/esesci/status/449902883933126659
Nvidia working on Wayland support for binary driver
Check out Datazenit - http://datazenit.com/
It is a web based database administration tool. In addition to your asked features it has data visualization and rich content editor.
That code is pretty well messed up, but it is straightforward. For anyone that wants to read it just be aware that it uses old style parameter type declarations.
Why do you want to engage with brands?

I don't mean that to be antagonistic, I just don't have much understanding of that particular thing.
What's misguiding?

No intention to misguide. I think it's completely accurate. They downloaded my app, inspected it, found AWS credentials and emailed me as a result.
The thought you a brining up a license debate instead of being grateful to Valve and their developers for their hard work is what scares me about copyleft licenses.
I'll try breaking it down, along with the questions that came to mind as I read it.

... people with high justice sensitivity showed more activity than average participants in parts of the brain associated with higher-order cognition.

What is the activity being measured relative to? One of the issues with any brain imaging study is the baseline condition you make comparisons with. To state that you saw more activity is only meaningful if you believe the baseline was appropriate.

Brain areas commonly linked with emotional processing were not affected.

Again, this must be relative to the baseline chosen, which the story doesn't mention but relies on. For example, in this study they do a comparison of Good vs Bad and then do the reverse comparison of Bad vs Good. If the emotional parts of the brain are equally active for both those conditions, then
they'll simply disappear in the contrast. You may or may not care about this depending on your research question, but it does affect the claims you can later make. To be clear, I'm fine with the paragraph so far.

Individuals who are sensitive to justice and fairness do not seem to be emotionally driven. Rather, they are cognitively driven.

This is where I take umbrage. Nothing in the previous para claimed (or demonstrated) that there was a fundamental distinction between cognition and emotion per se. Yet this quote tries to boil it down and makes claims about the emotional aspects that the study cannot support. That the emotional regions of the brain showed no difference may simply be an artefact of the study design. Having read the paper, they didn't have a proper baseline comparison so I treat any claims related to emotional processing with suspicion.
Microsoft Changes Policy for Accessing Email – Again
Remind HN: Arduino Day at SparkFun Electronics.
Reading/writing to S3 was my use case. I'm sure there are others.
#triestheapp #nooneshere #uninstall
They clearly say that they've detected my access credentials in the app. There's no way to associate my credentials to my app without downloading the app first and inspecting it.
I understand your fears. Look at how lie detector (polygraph) tests are still used and how the public generally assumes that they're a reliable indication of veracity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygraph#Validity

As with many technologies, though, you can't be a Luddite and slow progress because the general population might misunderstand it.
how about this: http://i.imgur.com/2jEais0.png
Actually this seems likely, hmmm:

traceroute to 8.8.4.4 (8.8.4.4), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 4.260 ms 0.969 ms 0.865 ms
2 host-92-44-0-42.reverse.superonline.net (92.44.0.42) 7.465 ms 7.903 ms 7.384 ms
3 host-82-222-174-177.reverse.superonline.net (82.222.174.177) 8.772 ms 13.703 ms 8.482 ms
4 host-85-29-17-234.reverse.superonline.net (85.29.17.234) 7.736 ms 7.830 ms
host-82-222-35-54.reverse.superonline.net (82.222.35.54) 11.449 ms
5 212.156.45.29.static.turktelekom.com.tr (212.156.45.29) 30.518 ms 17.123 ms 8.674 ms
6 inkilap-t2-1-kartal-t3-1.turktelekom.com.tr.220.212.81.in-addr.arpa (81.212.220.250) 9.945 ms * 15.140 ms
7 * * *
8 ulus-t3-4-ulus-t2-2.turktelekom.com.tr.223.212.81.in-addr.arpa (81.212.223.7) 18.020 ms 17.709 ms 15.444 ms
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
There's no doubt Bret Victor has many interesting ideas, but I thought this post[1] had some interesting counterpoints to his general thrust.

[1] http://www.evanmiller.org/dont-kill-math.html
LUCIFER IS RUNNING THE WORLD
I'm being dumb. I can see that it is preferable to embed credentials for a restricted IAM acct, not your root/master AWS account.

But how does using a TVM improve the situation? Surely you still need to embed creds which allow the app to use the TVM? In that case, an attacker can extract those creds, and ask the TVM for a time-limited token any time they like.

How does using a TVM improve security over embedding the creds of a restricted account?
So the LGBTQ community wants to dictate that the Mozilla CEO be a gay marriage supporter. They also seem to have trouble separating software from politics.
NOOOOOOOOOOO

But seriously, treat them like passwords.

Don't have the service store the secrets, have the service store hashes of the secrets with a regex for prefiltering (because hashing every word everywhere would be prohibitively expensive).
So your build speed is limited by metadata file accesses to network storage? Your network/storage must be really bad then. How about mirroring all the needed headers locally before building? You could establish that as a makefile rule.
A slap in the face with a wet fish can be good sometimes.

More than 10 years ago. Big conference of Web type people (not all developers but some) from Colleges and Universities in the UK, about 20 organisations represented, 50 people in the room. Disability Discrimination Act coming in. A talk organised by TechDis I remember (hazy memory of organisation details).

A profoundly blind Web developer using a screen reader with Windows steps up, with a colleague running the slides on a projector. She goes through some basic usability for non-sighted users (like http://diveintoaccessibility.info/ summary). Then she asks for a volunteer, and surfs to their College Web site live with the screen reader plugged through the PA.

"Red dot, red dot, red dot, [big list of navigation junk] Image image image image..."

You get the idea. She simply said: your Web site is telling me that you are not interested in blind students.

I think everyone present at that session went back and ran their sites through screen readers after that talk! No-one was feeling smug in the slightest.
Yeah, looks like they're mucking with the routes for Google Public DNS anycast IPs.

EDIT: More evidence that this is what's happening (they're doing to same to OpenDNS's anycast addresses): https://twitter.com/esesci/status/449902883933126659
why? because I want to hear what they have to say, and by "engage" I don't mean to reply/contact them, but simply consumer their content with the occasional ping:

i. News, I want to stay up to date: I like to follow Reuters, Associated Press, Financial Times, Pando, Recode
ii. General interest: The Economist, National Geographic, Science Magazine, various Universities
iii. Companies I use their products/services or find interesting and what to get their updates: IBM, Dropbox, Disney, TED, Formula 1 teams, Raspberry Pi, a bunch of airlines, hotel chains, etc
Exactly. Eat24 is mad that Facebook won't carry their ads for free, and I can't say that that's a position I have much sympathy for.
Using Aho-Corasick [1] the runtime would be about O(n+k+)

[1] http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aho–Corasick_string_matching_...
The broken window fallacy only works if the funds being spent can and will be spent in a more productive way.
I don't use Eat24 - but between this and their post on NSFW advertising - I feel like I should. Their content strategy people know what's up.