skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My wife recently got an iPhone so we now both have one. We have tried everything we can possibly think of, but we cannot send each other iMessages, only SMS.
Why are people focusing on the 'blackout' angle instead of talking about the content of the interview?
IIRC the shop managers I know just have a policy of watching suspected shoplifters very carefully rather than booting them on sight. They only get approached when they actually make the attempt. Under such a policy, it seems all right.
Like it! Good deal faster than the other one here http://sindresorhus.com/bower-components/
Some "bugs" are only fixed with class action lawsuits. This "bug" has been around for a while now and Apple can fix it they just don't prioritize bugs that allow people to switch away from them easily.

It is fraud to fail to deliver messages to my phone when I've switched phones. It shouldn't take me calling you, it should happen automatically and in under a day.
I think you are proving the point. Yes, I would agree that the pet rock was a stupid idea. Assuming I would find any reason to want a rock as a pet, why would I pay for one when I could simply go out to the garden and find one?

Yet many people did find the idea not only not stupid, but compelling enough to pay for.

So "stupid" is an entirely subjective assessment. I would never have invested in the "pet rock" idea as a funding venture, but clearly if I had done so at the right time, it could have been rewarding to do so.
5 Quick and Useful Google Search Commands • vlogg.com
Functors are Containers
This is why you disable iMessage before turning your device in.
From Apple's perspective, it sounds like quite a handy bug. Since I've been an iPhone user for 5 years, this bug makes me locked in to the iOS environment.

Given that they have established a market-distorting barrier to exit, they should be ordered by a court to fix this issue.
What about cases in which developer wants to vertically center a div, but he or she doesn't want to specify a height property?
nice work guys! keep up!
Relax, I'm not recommending anyone actually do it that way. I'm just old and found it humorous that something as simple as centering a div requires an entire article.
> "I think "I'm terrified of being assassinated by Russian/Chinese authorities" from a major dissident asylum seeker would be getting much more play."

There's no need for hypotheticals here. When actual Russian dissidents wind up actually dead under extremely suspicious circumstances it actually does not get much more coverage in the US media.
Complimentary Loper OS link, too: www.loper-os.org/?p=284
> Centering a div Within a div, Horizontally and Vertically

The code in this section is incorrect. "margin: auto" does nothing in the vertical direction. If you set the height of the outer div to something more than 160 px, you will see that the inner div is not centered.
You need to have a certain awareness of world events to realize that the article swapped things around for the purposes of satire. But then the key at the end is there to make sure no one who actually read to the end remains confused.
The Answer to Affordable Housing Could Lie Within a 3D Printer
Introducing Phinx 0.3.0: A PHP Database Migration Framework
Why Twitter needs a design reset
I smell an amazon fan boy hatin on other services. Did you even read his article? You don't have to use microsoft products on Azure. Get that weak shit outta here, son.
I don't know anything about the history of CSS's design, but I'm perpetually amazed that positioning (and specifically centering) requires so much CSS magic. I would think CSS positioning would be a one-liner, but instead it's a collection of context-dependent, browser-dependent recipes. I wonder if there's a good reason for the madness, or if it's just poor design. (FWIW, I'm a backend engineer and have only dabbled with front-end code.)
It's funny how so many of these HNers are so quick to jump the gun and join the "women are oppressed" circlejerk, and when someone disagrees, they call THEM sexist.

Do you all not remember high school? Don't you remember wondering why all the girls go for the football jocks and musicians? Don't fool yourself; engineers are boring. Engineering is isolating. That's why there are barely any female engineers.

You don't see people wondering why there aren't as many male kindergarten teachers.
"Bait"? Oh geez. First, they have Linux images all available under BizSpark.

Second, you act as if entrepreneurs are idiots who don't read terms/considerations of agreements and aren't capable of evaluating costs/benefits.

Everything about the BizSpark program is transparent. If you fail to understand the terms and to consider the ramifications (and if necessary hedge against risks by making your technology portable to other clouds), that is your fault. No one is forced into the program.
I know of a relationship that ended because of iMessages. They had had a fight and he texted her to apologize and then he never received any responses (they went straight to his computer) and then she got more upset, he thought she wasn't talking to him, etc.
On a positive note on how to move forward on this idea, there's an example in the Seattle startup scene that is tackling a similar government regulation issue by focusing on exactly one set of regulations at a time.

Remitly https://www.remitly.com/ provides a service to send cash overseas to the families of immigrants who now work in the US

Sending cash has a lot of regulatory hurdles, so they picked 1 US state (WA) and one overseas country (the Philippines) to start their business, and then expanding their reach, first to other US states, and eventually to other countries. Focusing on exactly one set of regulations at each end vastly simplifies the legal issues (and costs)
I am dubious about this "perceived to be less valuable to society and are therefore paid at a lower rate" idea. Wages are not set according to the social values of jobs. They are set according to how many people want to do the job. (supply) and how much money the employer can make by hiring someone (whence demand).

There are not many people who want to be petroleum engineers, because it is difficult and boring (i imagine, it's all pipes and oil and whatnot). However, oil companies make immense amounts of money from the work they do. Hence, they are paid a lot.

Lots of people want to be early childhood teachers, because it is noble and rewarding, it is, actually, greatly valued by society, and is not that academically demanding (it is tremendously personally demanding, of course). However, primary schools are not exactly profitable. Hence, they are not paid a lot.

So, i think the claim that "women make less remunerative life choices" does hold water. But here's the thing: that's not the problem. The problem is that the choices they happen to make are less remunerative, because of the operation of the above mechanism. The problem that needs fixing here is that people who choose to do work that is socially valuable but not directly connected to a mechanism of profit are not paid as well as those who do. The solution is something far more radical than just getting more women to take up engineering.
Using the same URL for fetching list of packages though. The main reason of rebuilding it was because of sharing searched results with team members as URLs.
Probably the same guy: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/3615

He does have a point about there being inconsistencies in the protocol. It's a pretty ugly binary protocol.

That said, the work done by Bitcoin miners is totally useless for bruteforcing anything except double SHA256 hashes, which AFAIK is not used anywhere besides Bitcoin and derived cryptocurrencies. It's certainly not useful for brute forcing ECC keys.
Then unfortunately you have to calculate it with JS if it varies. Vertically centering divs has always been a gigantic pain-in-the-ass. If anyone has a better idea for doing this without JS, please let me know. Once CSS implements variable-based elements (ie #div.height) then we'll have a lot more control.
Try looking in the independent sector for teaching positions? Pay is much better and there's much less governmental meddling.
I have no idea about whether Snowden was covered, but "media blackout" certainly doesn't require gov't violence:

* media (corporations typically owned by larger corporations) can decide not to report what's against owners' interests

* advertisers (corporations buying access to eyeballs) may find news against their interests

Many journalists might want to report, but they have bosses/editors, and those covering important news are selected for having certain attitudes. Government may threaten to revoke access, but that's probably too marginal to cause a blackout.
> My employer's system (which comes from a big name edu-prise sw vendor) takes a 6 digit password and my system username is public information ...

Ahhh, Sungard.
"The Agriculture industry consumed 6,987 GL of water in 2009–10. Sheep, beef cattle and grain farming had the highest consumption within the Agriculture industry,"

http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/...

Also

http://www.grub.com.au/News/FoodFacts/post/2013/02/06/In-Aus...
My main point stands. If you want to dramatically reduce your impact on water use, consume less meat.
True, but I think he meant give them a chance. His point is that people seem to be criticizing it without direct experience, especially in a case that seems clearly fair on Azure's part to people who have experience with both Azure and AWS. Generally speaking, how can something earn credit when people are prejudiced against it and won't give it a chance?
Oh the animated one, yeah you are correct that is not entropy at all.

It is just bytes visually represented.
1byte = x axis, 2byte = y axis, 3byte = z axis. And then jump forward and repeat.
Rather than telling your friends to delete their entire history, what's the problem with asking them to just make a new contact listing? I'm not familiar with the gubbins of iMessage.
The Acquisition Blues
LFS is not a distro. It's documentation to build your own distro.

Xorg, GTK and all the irrelevant stuff you mention have nothing to do with it.
If you remove yum/rpm or dpkg/apt from the system it simply stops working. Also
you can't replace apt with yum and vice versa, as you can with KDE vs GNOME.

Package management is a very integral part of a system, that's why we separate
distros by their packaging system(apt-based, rpm-based, emerge, etc...)

You keep spouting nonsense and you keep being voted down, yet your insistence
in showing your ignorance is astonishing.
Turning off iMessage on her iPhone, making sure any references to iMessage in any device settings (including OSX) related only to an email address not a cell number before moving to Android meant my girlfriend didn't experience any issues. Not sure if that's a panacea and she was just lucky though ..
By default grep is going through all of the .git directly, which is the part `git grep` filters out. `ag` also filters them out (and is only slightly slower than git grep by default, with all the colors and stuff), or you can tell grep to only check relevant files with e.g. `grep $PATTERN $(git ls-tree --full-tree --name-only -r HEAD)`.

On my machine, using postgres's repository, I get the following:

> time git grep foo > /dev/null
0.22s user 0.25s system 151% cpu 0.312 total
> time ag foo > /dev/null
0.85s user 0.19s system 174% cpu 0.596 total
> time grep foo $(git ls-tree --full-tree --name-only -r HEAD) > /dev/null
0.13s user 0.10s system 93% cpu 0.255 total

grep's faster than git grep. In fact, grep is already as fast as git grep just ignoring .git:

> time grep foo -r . --exclude-dir=.git > /dev/null
0.15s user 0.16s system 91% cpu 0.338 total
The DOT ruled[1] against AA and fined them a whole $60,000 after a complaint[2] from Edelman.

[1] http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=DOT-OST-2013-0...

[2] http://www.benedelman.org/airfare-advertising/americanairlin...
Good story. I really like EVE and was ready to convert to a paying customer after my 15 day trial, but two things kept me from doing it.

First was cost, retail is 20$ a month, with a discount you can get it down to 10$ a month for the first year if you prepay, but after that I think the biggest discount is 15$. Don't quote me I am going off of memory.

Personally I am willing to pay 10$ a month. Prepaying is fine. I am not really cost sensitive and could be a whale (heck I am for Star Citizen).

The last issue was skill training. It's a bullshit mechanic to force you to subscribe for years on end because it is time based. You can choose which skills are trained, but there is no gameplay element you can use to progress beyond a lack of skill training. You can't even pay.

I honestly would have converted were it not for a mechanic so obviously designed to keep you pumping in a monthly fee by preventing you from "finishing" the game at your own pace. I like to play games, and then be done with them and move on.

I know my decision making process is different then most. I play zero games on my phone and tablet. I feel like this is similar to the IAP model where you have to fork over the megabucks to get anywhere.
I'd love to see a list of services grouped by industry that use 2 factor authentication. It would affect which service I use.
reduce is one very fundamental construct too https://www.google.com/search?q=universality+of+reduce
You need >50% of a bill for them to redeem it, though.
Yahoo really has to get a leg up on security. This happens almost every other week.
Yup, just a typo!
Heres's a trick using pseudo elements : http://codepen.io/anon/pen/pIFna
With any luck, this post will be killed because these sorts of discussions never go well on HN, and help reinforce all the cultural issues everyone pretends don't exist.

In the meantime...

Firstly, let's put our journalism 101 hat on. The article name "Is There a Cyber War on Women?" is precisely what it is so as to lead you into thinking "no". It's a classic newspaper trick - ask a question because the article doesn't give a conclusive answer. And indeed it can't, as Cathy is forced to admit that there is real abuse happening against women online. The original Pacific Standard article was careful to never call it a "war against women". The NY Times article only used that phase in the title, and otherwise refers more correctly to a "culture-war".In my skim of the NYT article, actually, I was quite impressed with what seemed to be a well-thought-out article.

"A man who gets into a fight with a woman risks being seen as a bully if he wins, a weakling if he loses. Women in the public eye may experience more hate, but they may also benefit from chivalry"

The quote pretty much sums up everything that is wrong about the article, precisely because she is right, but for all the wrong reasons:

1. If a man wins a fight against a woman, he is a "bully" precisely because women giving in to men is seen as normal, not something one has to fight for.

2. If a man is beaten by a woman in a fight, he is a weakling precisely because women are viewed societally as being weak

3. The existence of 'chivalry' in no means corrects for measurably greater hate. Even if they were somehow of equal level, in general the effects of suffering are not countered by good experiences - they still cause damage.

4. Sorry men, you're in an absolute double-bind here, and it is shit for those of you who are genuinely good people :(. This is because no interpretation of chivalry is without critique. Help men and women equally, and our society will view consider you to have given women the greater amount of time. Help women only, and either you are saying men and women need different levels of help and both men and women in our society are worse for this. Or, much less positively, it's 'white knighting' and an attempt to get in someone's pants.

I'll leave as an exercise to the reader extending the concepts here into why abuse against males (online or otherwise) isn't talked about more or treated seriously.

As a final aside, it is also worth noting that there is plenty of evidence that, in a mixed group of equal gender counts, women need only take up significantly less than half the discussion time to already be considered to be dominating the discussion (see also society's belief in 'meek'/'quiet'/'shy' as desirable properties in women). This automatically polarises any attempts to report in a balanced nature on the subject even further
The raiding and pillaging was probably more to do with societal factors than genetics.
Not true at all. Observation is very legitimate and valid scientific pursuit. We will not be able to explain the human brain for a long time but that does not mean we should not make observations about how it behaves and find repeating patterns of behavior.

One parallel is that humans were able to observe and accurately predict the movement of the stars before they ever knew what stars were. In fact humans were able to use stars for navigation long before anyone had the slightest idea of the actual physical nature of a star, or could offer any plausible explanation as to why a star moves a certain way.

Furthermore, observations can be tested and supported by empirical evidence. You can for example run brain scans for criminals and see if the psychopath brain pattern has higher incidence among prison populations (it definitely does).

Of course you cannot perform the types of precise tests on humans one performs with atoms, but psychology there are scientific tests and studies you can do.
The Next 24 Hours Are Going To Be HUGE
feta?? hahaah nice
Why Don’t You Do Something Other Than Sit at Your Computer?
Even with a capped price-per-month plan, my options for setting specific caps on types of costs are limited.
If You Haven’t Worked Remotely Abroad, You’re Missing Out.
Yup. There goes my 5 bucks.
Did he make a typo?

http://codepen.io/cheapsteak/pen/axJit

Doesn't work, unless you change `position: relative` to `position: absolute`
I'll admit that the table-cell approach is nice -- thank you. But how curious that the article, which purports to be an in-depth examination, doesn't mention it. And how curious that the table-cell approach has not turned up in the numerous times I've gone looking on-line for a robust, pure CSS solution. I've long harbored suspicions that many CSS gurus are too quick to adopt complex solutions.
Ok, so people are willing to trade off performance for safety, flexibility and price.
It was tried a few years back: http://www.idroidproject.org

They had to rewrite the drivers, of course.
That view is insanely simplistic. Sometimes people do things that are against their own interests because they are in the clutches of an addiction. In these situations, it is sometimes OK for someone to step in and overrule them. Sometimes it's not just OK, but morally necessary.

It can be better to temporarily infringe someone's rights if it stops them from doing something that they will regret for the rest of their life.
> If anyone has a better idea for doing this without JS, please let me know.

Flexbox, with optional fallback to JS for IE 8 and 9. That said, vertical centering is almost always a nice-to-have rather than a must-have so personally I wouldn't even use a fallback.

http://philipwalton.github.io/solved-by-flexbox/demos/vertic...

http://caniuse.com/flexbox
When you're talking about an average latency of single digit us for a regular switch and < 500ns for a low-end performance switch, the difference between 10 and 20 microseconds is massive.
Slides: Growth Hacking by Morgan Brown – GrowthHackers
More importantly why the heck would you entrust a "third party" with _passwords_ !? That just seems nuts.
thanks guys! We thought that it would be better to make it in a "tizing" way ;)
Social Media And The Super Bowl: A Brief History
Thanks! If you've got an iphone don't hesitate to apply for beta!
A fairly simple solution would be to get a Google Voice number, that would forward to your real number - and have people text you via Google Voice. However, if anybody calls (or sends an old-style SMS to) your old number, it would still come through.
I noticed this over the last 2 weeks. I switched my mobile data off, and now I don't get SMS from my friends until I return home.

Nice one Apple.
Red Lotus Technologies Inc. Mountain View, CA.
www.redlotustech.com

Position: Industrial designer
Starts: March 2014
--------------------
We are a startup company funded by the U.S. Department of Defense that builds visual support technologies for training soldiers to detect IEDs with handheld detectors.

We have built prototypes that are currently being evaluated at U.S. DoD training sites.

We are seeking an industrial designer who can help us design weatherized and manufacturing-ready versions of our product.

Please email info@redlotustech.com with any questions / resume.
> I wonder if there's a good reason for the madness

Well the reason is that CSS originally wasn't intended for layout….

But since there was no other tool for layout, once the web design community decided to remove tables from layout it got drafted despite being severely insufficient. Layout modules have just started being developed, fought upon and implemented in the last few years. Here's how vertical centering looks like when using flexbox (http://philipwalton.github.io/solved-by-flexbox/demos/vertic...):

.parent {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}

.centered {
max-width: 50%;
}

(note: this ignores prefixing, specs differences and browser-specific issues, here's the component https://github.com/philipwalton/solved-by-flexbox/blob/maste... which is itself expanded to suit browsers)
damn, I thought that box was supposed to show the alignment of the div itself too, and I couldn't figure out why it looked always the same
UK government tackles wrongly-blocked websites
Get interesting music from SoundCloud with Clojure
This is not a solution if you live outside of the USA.
Holding Bitcoin does not make it available for capital investment.

In this forum, I would expect that to be a significant issue.
NFL claims $600M in Super Bowl economic impact. Economists say it's closer to $0
Much like Bitcoin, the rate of inflation of Dogecoin converges to zero. So maybe it's not a big deal :)
Love and Harmony
There needs to be a blog about this.
I don't know the current state of browser's but the is likely because, at least at one time, the display type of table wasn't widely supported.

On the other hand support for centering vertically with auto isn't/wasn't widely supported either.
It doesn't mention flexbox[0] either. It's not an in-depth examination, it's blogspam. There are better[1] years-old[2] resources which are no more incomplete.

[0] http://philipwalton.github.io/solved-by-flexbox/demos/vertic...

[1] http://css-tricks.com/centering-in-the-unknown/

[2] http://gtwebdev.com/workshop/vcenter/vcenter-inline-css.php
Came here to say the same thing. Not sure the rest of the article is worth reading if the author doesn't know CSS well enough that a) they don't know a priori that this is wrong, and b) manages to convince themselves it's true using Codepen

Here's the Codepen that shows it with a larger outer div,

http://codepen.io/jessedhillon/pen/CDqEe
I understand your concern about the price. I played the beta 11 years ago and did not subscribe. Yet, I followed the development of the game as a non player, always wanting to come back to the game to fully understand it.
Of course the many stories I heard about the game helped keeping me motivated: https://truestories.eveonline.com/truestories/index.html

As for the training process, I tried to adapt my type of gaming with what skills I had at the moment from the beginning. I spent the first 2 months figuring out how to shape a balanced pilot: not buying crazy stuff you can loose (or you can't even equip because you don't fully understand the requirements mechanics), train skills that seem to matter, not focus on a certain game mode etc.
And it has been rewarding because at no point so far have I felt enslaved by the skills system.

But maybe that is because I am a fanboy and lack objectivity ;)