skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Yes we broke the U-Boat codes

The Enigma encoding was actually cracked by Polish mathematicians and handed to the UK during the summer of 1939. In exchange, Poles expected the UK to join them, were they to be attacked by Germans. Unfortunately, that part of the bargain never materialised.
that'd be it then!
> I confirm having read and fully understood the hubiC General COnditions

> PDF en français

Luckily, Google Translate provides mostly readable results, but if they present site in English they really should consider translating ToS too.

Although I was unable to share direct link (Google rejects to translate PDF from URL, only by direct upload), and the result not peeep.us-able, I was able to save it as a paste here to save others time downloading and uploading the PDF: http://dabblet.com/gist/8861421 (Dabblet seems broken, too, "view full page result" fails, so click "result" tab to get rid of unnecessary panes)

Some points I got(but may have misunderstood) from there:

- There're 10Mbps up/down bandwidth limits.

- You remain the sole owner of your data.

- Not allowed to store and/or share ("stocker et/ou partager") porn (huh‽) and some other kind of content considered indecent, disturbing or unlawful.

- They're not responsible for failed transfers, you explicitly agree have to check that the files succesfully uploaded by yourself.

- Commercial use of service is prohibited (uh... only personal accounts?)

- I didn't really get this part: "Le Client s'engage à régler directement à l'auteur de la réclamation toute somme que celui ci exigerait d’OVH." but Google says it translates to something like "The Customer agrees to pay directly to the author of the claim any amount that it would require OVH." From the context, I may guess the meaning is, that if you somehow caused some damage, you're going to protect OVH in court and if you/they're held responsible, you're going to pay those damages. Hmmm...
For all those who deleted by mistake their lookback it took me three days to find how to get it back.......
1. log into your facebook
2. top right find where you can find actual form to report problem
3. actually write what you did
4. say sorry lol
5. wait 24 hours
6. log back in
7. hopefully like mine yours will come back
8. play it 3 times
4. log out
5. log in
7. green share button will appear
8. don't touch or alter again.
I hope all who want it back get it back good luck
Tony
What's the point of republishing Dilbert if you're going to censor what you don't like? Nobody forced them to publish Dilbert, it was a choice they made. Is it okay for Amazon to redact portions of books that are contentious?

Furthermore, the date on the comic was apparently edited to hide what had been done. If you don't want to publish something because it's contentious, then IMO have the balls to state as much and simply don't publish anything - don't pretend the comic doesn't exist.
>> This makes good sense, but it also suggests that Google is more than willing to handle these headaches without profit incentives.

I'm not an Android developer, but judging from what I've read about the experience Android developers have with the Play store, Google basically doesn't care about after-sales support for customers at all, and unloads about every kind of headache imaginable directly onto the developer (including payment problems, refunds, broken IAP, etc).
Ukraine: Bugged Conversations, Meddling Superpowers
Systems Software Research is Irrelevant (Rob Pike, 2000)
The discussion here is scary, very scary.
I get deeply uncomfortable when Google does something like this. In general I think it is easy to judge someone half a world away and it is very hard to get things right when looking across cultural barriers. I am going to give my perspective here as an American living in Indonesia and married to a Chinese-Indonesian.

One of the key issues that nobody looks at when they talk about this is very distinctly a collective lifestyle choice: retirement living and who retirees live with. This is undoubtedly a collective lifestyle choice, and societies tend to fall in one of two groups: retire with the kids (the international norm) or retire with the spouse.

This has tremendous implications for views on reproduction and hence sexuality. Not only is childlessness not a viable personal choice in retire-with-the-children cultures but same-sex couples can never have equality in such cultures. Even if you revert the controversial laws in Russia, they would be replaced with very binding social pressures that are not easily resisted.

Part of the reason is that as soon as the norm is that people retire with the kids, and as soon as this expectation is set, then parents get (and find ways to make actionable) a legitimate interest in who their children marry. This means that parents effectively have something nearly like a veto power over childrens' spousal choices but that veto can be overridden by "accidental" pregnancy. This fact effectively dooms the notion of equal rights for same-sex couples in such cultures, and in the end one is, I think, forced either to recognize an equivalent to social security payments as a human right or concede that actual access to same-sex marriage is not one.

Russia is in the retire-with-the-kids category, and as a result they have a strong interest in maintaining a sort of traditional family structure that has all but disappeared in Western Europe, the United States, Canada, etc, namely the multi-generation household. On the other hand, for cultures where the primary human contact in retirement is the spouse, then it is deeply unfair to deny people the choice of that relationship for whatever reason they want to spend that time with someone of the same sex (and the reason really is unimportant at that point).

As an American living in another retire-with-the-kids culture, I will say that such systems work and work out well for everyone, but that isn't a reason to perpetuate gross unfairness in the US.

So I stand in the awkward place of saying that most Western countries probably should look at legalizing same-sex marriage, but that a gay rights movement really would be deeply socially disruptive in a really bad way in much of the world (including Russia).

Like it or not, if we ever succeeded in remaking the world in the American image, we'd destroy the planet. If you don't believe me, look at per capita greenhouse gas emissions.
I'd also say it demonstrates the importance of identifying a niche. Nobody cares about generic AltCoin #842012.

Positioning themselves as a tipping currency was a smart move. The internet has badly needed a way to reward people with very small amounts of money for years. That's one of the things I really like about doge, personally.
It probably depends on a syndicate. Different sites often show different comics because they license them from different sources. It's not Yahoo's fault.
You make a false choice. It should be the industry's choice whether to stop using DRM or having their DRM based on a dying platform that fewer and fewer people will be using.
The reason why this is worthy news is that you made it so. Hence, think twice unless you are Dogecoin lover, and if you are, mission accomplished. Many times things come from behind and win, watch the moon closely this time.
Yes. I do agree with you. But why constantly tell (or imply to) people they're bad/evil for not believing in homosexuality? Unless there's scientific proof, you will never change their minds.
So instead of evidence, you've stated a case of a rock group who vandalised a church... Well that proves it then! Russia is obviously clearly a "baddie".
Manta 2010 -- but it's sorely in need of an update
Not sure if that will help, but here's my understanding:

"Le Client s'engage à régler directement à l'auteur de la réclamation toute somme que celui ci exigerait d’OVH." If an author ask compensation to OVH, you (OVH Client) pay the author directly the wanted amount.
One is a choice and the other is not. It's obvious to me which prejudice is wrong.
It's a good word for it. It has an established meaning, it is universally understood, etc etc. The fundamental use of language is to communicate, and I don't really think homophobia fails in this respect. There are plenty of non-"good" words for other things in the English language that get used very often without people quoting them or complaining about their use.
Which means we shouldn't care about people in India getting arrested because they're gay?
Whether or not homosexuality is "innate" is entirely irrelevant to its morality. Even if it was completely a choice (as it is to some extent for bisexual people) it would still be completely okay. Personally I feel like LGBT campaigns do themselves a disservice when they focus on this argument.

Furthermore, if you're going to consider "making assertions without scientific evidence" as sufficient grounds to ban speech, you're going to be silencing a lot of people before you're done.
Ah, right. Thank you. Seems this part is about copyright violations. Sounds reasonable to me then.
Were these recent stories ? I remember slightly lower than average service quality, but this was around 2003.
Please, so that we can test such an assertion:

1. Define human rights

2. Provide a methodology by which they can be objectively known.

Is a right to be left alone to one's culture a human right? Is a right not to be deprived by outside powers of one's native language a human right? And who gets to set the limits on the outer limits of such a right? (i.e. is the right to advocate the position that genocide of, say, black folk, is desirable a human right? What about pornography?).

My own sense is that usually these have no epistemology behind them and are based solely on projecting one's a priori assumptions onto the world.
This is fascinating. The strip has clearly been edited to insert today's date, but the strip itself is from maybe 1996? Can't quite read the copyright.

This is probably a syndication issue rather than something Yahoo is responsible for, but it's pretty interesting nonetheless.
Telerik Platform
What is happening on this thread? Is this really a reflection of the community here at hn? I'm flabbergasted. Wake up, West coast, we need you!
I hope that most people would say the same thing as seivan in a face-to-face conversation. I know I would.
I would tell you that in person, and honestly there is no argument that would convince you that human rights is not propaganda so technically there is no way of going forward here... Scratch that, I probably wouldn't converse with you.
How to make your AngularJS app crawlable
Ask HN: How much of a pay cut would you take?
I'm a software developer with around 10 years of experience doing mostly server side development with some client-server and a few web apps thrown in. I work at a company where I make a decent amount of money for the area. I think the average here is around 95K and I make around 35-40K more after bonuses. Unfortunately I'm not happy here. My job has become tedious and frustrating and it's getting harder and harder to get out of bed and go to work each day. I recently talked to a recruiter in my area and he confirmed what I was suspecting - I am not going to find that very easily.

I don't have any of the hot skills like iOS or Android but plan on doing some things in my spare time to boost that. However it is hard to motivate myself when I get home tired and somewhat depressed to do anything other than throw back a few beers and stare at the TV.

I can afford a pay cut. We don't spend a ton of money. I just can't get over the thought of taking a step backward. Even though I could still be paid well at my next job, knowing it probably won't be as high as it could be is worrisome. My logical side says that happiness and less stress is worth a cut in pay but my greedy ego doesn't agree.

So how much of a pay cut would you take if you weren't happy? And how would you get over it? Or would you wait it out until you found something comparable? Or are you still just hanging on to that good paying job because you don't think it will be better elsewhere? I think I've worked with those people from time to time and I don't want to become them.
Hmm...

Wall of text.. ok, challenge accepted!

read

scroll

read

scroll

read

scroll

read

MORE!?...

scroll

NOT MORE I GET IT!

...computers are stupid but at least they don't give up!
I'm not a person who usually weighs into these sort of debates, but I want to address something with you.

Your entire post is based on the premise that each culture's practices are all valid within the culture that they are practised within. This is demonstrably false. The fact that Russians support each other via a traditional heterosexual family unit does not in any way mean that someone who is gay should be discriminated against.

The whole premise of your argument is that gays cannot retire with children, so they will be a burden upon the state. That's absurd. What about those who are childless? Or remain single all their lives? Or lose a spouse early and never have children? Seems to me that such systems do not "work and work out well for everyone".
“All units are ridiculous” – how to understand scale
You could try the following google, it gives you an idea:

https://www.google.com/search?q=OVH+support+site:webhostingt...

For some people a provider like OVH is "good enough", but there is a reason it is cheap.
You know what? Homosexuals are being killed in the Middle East right now but for some reason, the rest of the world doesn't care. There are no similar campaigns on the scale of gay marriage campaigns to stop the mass killings of homosexuals in the Middle East. Aren't there more important battles to focus on?
Steve Wozniak thinks Apple should make an Android phone
No it's not; it's a Dogecoin app, in the app store, so the title is accurate.

Sure, it may need a clarification that it's a read-only app, but still.
No there were. A lot of people volunteered knowing they will be almost certainly killed. In a democratic country it wasn't possible. And it was the main reason why so many people were killed - they were prepared to die and kill (purges of the 1930s, on both sides, devalued the human life, it was okay to report your neighbor to NKVD knowing he will be shot just out of jealousity). WWII is a crime of totalitarian regimes - on all sides - and is a lesson to learn that totalitarianism is unacceptable and never makes anyone happy.
Nobody said that - it's a strawman.
This is amazing. I was sad that no good WYSIWYG editor existed. I was sad that Sulbime Text had no color picker. Well this is gonna be a game changer.

There is always a first phase in a project where I only code HTML and CSS. I create the layout, the scaffoldings, the different pages, etc...

And as amazing as emacs and ST3 are, it's a pain in the ass to do that part with them.

I feel like I'm gonna use Brackets a lot.
Ask HN: bad idea? Turn Dropbox folders into projects
I'd love to hear thoughts on this idea for a YAPMA (yet another project management app).

Assumption: people manage projects mostly through dropbox (for files) and email (for communication). Why does projectmanagementappX make me upload files?

Solution: a project management app that turns your Dropbox folders into project management (adds structure and features to it, people, dates, todo's, whatever). In my mind this is a web app, but it starts with your Dropbox and you never have to change how you work (put files in Dropbox).

Initial core audience: designers.

Thoughts?
The only problem with that is that it can tough to introduce a new or non-advanced user to torrents .. . they've got to get special software.
Watch Crazy Finns Pitch Their Startups in a Frozen River (live)
That's what I've read too, but there doesn't seem to be any official story. I've also read that they closed because it was being abused with services like Classicfon where you earn a few cents per hour you call them. VoIP is a crazy world.
But to be fair, Google isn't the only one doing stupid stuff like this. Read this piece slowly and see if you notice what I noticed: http://www.alternet.org/world/us-evangelicals-fueled-rise-ru...

What I noticed was that while the author was male, with the exception of Medvedev (whose position on abortion he didn't talk about), every politician he attacked in the Russian government on the abortion issue was a woman. Evidently Russian women (according to Alternet and The Nation) cannot be trusted with setting abortion policy: that role must fall to Western men....
as trivial aversion do
So you can't talk about homosexuality in a positive way to "minors" without being locked up. Well that sounds like quite a free society.
If you went around capturing and torturing spiders, would you be called an arachnophobe?

It's just a bit silly. Yes, words get misused all the time, and English is imperfect, but this one just seems ridiculous to me.
Spinning ball analogy is very common in school or basic uni.

I think it is spinning ball 100% of the time.
Congrats Paul! We'll keep spreading the word!

-Mike Schroll
Dungeon Keeper stacks deck in EA's favor when it comes to Android feedback
300k on the first million...
BE GAY!

Gay people are more attractive, and have more sex. They are also more successful in business due to their inbuilt GAYDAR system, which enables better networking.

Think of your own future - go gay today!
As a data warehousing/BI specialist I'd like to share my interperetation.

'Data' data (as in your company's data warehouse) is primarily internal data. By this I mean: data generated primarily by your source systems or associated business processes.

'Big' data is external data. It is tweets that express opinion about your brand. Weather patterns that might influence supply logistics. Demographics of markets you wish to penetrate.

I think there are a great number of slightly different interpretations out there but pragmatically speaking, what I have suggested here makes sense.
That's an interesting grammatical choice of the word "upholds" in the title, OP. When I read "gay rights" and "upholds" together, I start thinking about the law. My first thought when opening this thread was trying to understand what role Google had in upholding the laws related to gay rights (I was clearly wrong haha). But then I thought about it - maybe you meant "supports" but English isn't your first language? They are technically synonyms - support and uphold - but, in common usage when discussing things like this, I think most English-as-first-language speakers would have used the word "supports" to avoid confusion with legal bodies.

Google Doodle Supports Gay Rights Ahead of Sochi Olympics
For all those who deleted by mistake their lookback it took me three days to find how to get it back....... 1. log into your facebook 2. top right find where you can find actual form to report problem 3. actually write what you did 4. say sorry lol 5. wait 24 hours 6. log back in 7. hopefully like mine yours will come back 8. play it 3 times 4. log out 5. log in 7. green share button will appear 8. don't touch or alter again. I hope all who want it back get it back good luck Tony
Agreed. I'm miserably uncomfortable with the pseudo-social-science veneer being splashed around in the name of supporting the repression of a minority culture.
That is stunningly good. What a powerful orator. Thank you for sharing.
Every time I read about the rise of the American surveillance state I always ask myself this, "would our founding forefathers actually agree to this?"

I cannot see how they would allow for persistent surveillance as proposed in this article. I would even go so far as to say the same about all of the NSA revelations.

The problem I think is that the general public is disinterested and ignorant of our nation's roots. Until such a time that Joe and Jane Average get angry and active our America will continue down this evil path of no return.
This is the opposite of a new frontier for privacy.
I doubt that gay athletes are thinking about promoting homosexualism among kids in Russia,

Yeah, but we all know what this law actually involves, and it's disingenuous to claim otherwise.

The "anti-propoganda" law essentially bans gay pride events and public defence of gay rights. It was backed by a president who directly equated homosexuality and paedophillia. That's not a gay-friendly environment, by any stretch of the imagination.

This is good old-fashioned minority-hate-stirring, and it should be roundly condemned. That fact that there are no explicit laws banning homosexuality in Russia is nearly irrelevant.
While I appreciate the debunking effort (the original article smelled fishy and lacked details), the advice at the end is laughable. "don't click on stuff" really? That's your security advice?!
Should you talk to minors about S&M or pedophilia? Maybe teach them how to make bombs. Freedom of speech and everything!

Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. And the US is certainly not in a position to preach anything about freedom.
notifying the public of atrocities committed by the military / government is also illegal, and gets you tried under espionage laws, really reeks of freedom doesn't it?...
Cobalt intoxication diagnosed with the help of Dr House
You might want to check out our take on programming with touch-screens: https://vimeo.com/81458709
South will not be available in Django 1.7. Django 1.7 migrations have been developed by the same person that has developed South and can be see as an official successor to South. Therefore you have no choice but to use the new migrations.

Here's a link to the Kickstarter campaign which includes all conceptual information about this: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/andrewgodwin/schema-mig...

Here's a link to the official docs describing how to use migrations and the upgrade path from South: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/migrations/
They are not scared of homosexuals, but of homosexuality. It represents a threat to set values and a set way of living to certain individuals. If it wasn't considered a threat to those values, why suppress it? It's homophobia.
VPS Hosting: When do I need one?
This whole thread is a masterclass in falsely framing arguments.
Yep... really interesting article but just too long
Your premise that Western culture's social norms are absolute and universal is far more dangerous than OP's idea of having each culture define its own practices. The West has a genocidal history of bringing "civilization" to other cultures that resulted in their decimation. I fear that colonial imperialism justified by "white man's burden" is being replaced with "human rights imperialism" where the Western dogma of human rights justifies invasion or manipulation of countries out of favor with the West. Case in point http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6f3rHZV5JQ discussion of US State Dept. Ambassador to Ukraine on how to install US chosen puppets in Ukraine.
> "But why constantly tell (or imply to) people they're bad/evil for not believing in homosexuality?"

If someone said that to me, "I don't believe in homosexuality", I wouldn't call them bad or evil, though I might try to convince them they're wrong. Sexual preferences exist whether you believe in them or not.

> "Unless there's scientific proof, you will never change their minds."

You limited the terms to genetics. It may not be genetic. If it were, I suspect these same people would seek the "cure".

There's plenty of research on the subject, working theories and all. Can't claim to be up on them, to be honest.

The most interesting research I've read was into health aspects of homosexuality. By far the greatest risk discussed in each paper was depression related to discrimination and homophobia.
Absolute evil genius, expect this to become the norm.

> I just wish for a Dungeon Keeper version of $5 and with no In App-Purchases

That's the problem, they wouldn't make enough money if you bought it for $5, they'd need to sell it for $15-$25 to make a decent profit. It's quite amusing how mobile game fans act like they're being really generous offering the branch of $5 (Less than a cup of coffee) to developers for hours of entertainment.