skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Easy Peanut Butter Cookies
Historical past connected with Peanut butter piece of food
George Washington Carver (1864-1943), a good United states agricultural extendable instructor, via Alabama's Tuskegee Commence,peanut butter cookie recipe had been the actual renowned marketer of the peanut instead for that natural cotton scalp,Easy Peanut Butter Cookies which in turn ended up greatly harmed through the boll weevil. He / she gathered 105 peanut dishes via several cookbooks, agricultural ads as well as other options.Easy Peanut Butter Cookies With his or her 1916 Analysis Bulletins named How you can Expand the actual Peanut and also 105 Ways of Preparing this for Human Intake, they bundled 3 dishes for peanut cookies getting in touch with for crushed/chopped nuts being an compound. It had been definitely not before first 1920 which peanut butter had been outlined being an compound within the cookies.
I'd say just the opposite. The reason smarter companies don't have these high-profile big failures is that they're much more willing to pull the plug on a failing project earlier, learn the lessons and respond correctly.
Twilight (color adjustment is in the free version) works nicely too.
Bootstrap contains some JavaScript for certain modules, but the majority is CSS (well, Less).
The NHTSA considers it a recall. This "not a recall" claim seems to just be PR spin by Tesla:

http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/acms/cs/jaxrs/download/doc/UCM4...

Also, Tesla calls it "a voluntary recall" in this document (at the end of the Chronology of Principal Events):

http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/acms/cs/jaxrs/download/doc/UCM4...
Err Bootstrap isn't a complete solution.
And GOG refuses to add GNU/Linux support. Considering that many GOG games run in DOSEmu anyway and some come with native Linux support this is not really understandable.
I wish Nvidia would join HSA already, and stop having such a Not Invented Here mentality.
I can talk much faster than I can type, and read at about the same speed as listening. You can also speed up audio to inhuman speeds, it just takes a little bit to get used to.

It's also a lot more handy than pulling out a keyboard (especially a mobile or touchscreen one) or screen.
Link to report?
Ever since they stopped the print edition. Actually before that, since they had the sci-fi guy on the back page who every week would change the colour scheme of his wordprocessor and write a whole article about it.
A beginner's guide to adding dynamic functionality with JavaScript and jQuery
This is interesting, but my experience is that Intel's CPU's are so monumentally superior that it will take a lot more than GPU improvements to make me start buying AMD again.

Specifically I'm dealing with compile workloads here: compiling the Linux kernel on my Haswell desktop CPU is almost a 4x speedup over an AMD Bulldozer CPU I used to have. I used to think people exaggerated the difference, but they don't: Intel is really that much better. And the Haswells have really closed the price gulf.
This is an incredibly misleading title. Tesla owners will undergo no inconvenience, since the item being replaced is the wall adapter, not any parts on the car.
No it isn't. The majority of the Bootstrap framework is CSS. (there's an optional JavaScript component for advanced functionality)
CentOS is a clone of RHEL - there is work involved in running the build systems, mirrors, de-branding and such. It is intended for those who want to use RHEL - personally, non-profit, etc., who just cannot justify the support licensing of RHEL.

Fedora, on the other hand, is Red Hat’s “next generation”. Software packages have a change to mature, be soundly tested and stabilify there before being introduced to RHEL, to give those “enterprise” users a fair degree of security on system stability, at the expense of a slow lead time (for example, one of my employers still recommends RHEL 5.x, which is “current”, though 6.x is out. RHEL 5.x uses Kernel 2.6).
Agreed. The janitors should sue for their rightful piece of the action.
And thank goodness. If anybody knows where the grave is, I'd like to go piss on it.

As somebody who long ago did print design, I totally get why designers would want pixel-perfect control. It is awesome, but you get that in print because you are physically manufacturing an object and sending it to people. The web was device independent from the get-go. It wasn't your paper anymore; it was their screens. There were a couple of designers I came close to beating to death with their own Pantone books because they refused to get that.

Sadly, the desire for pixel perfection led to trying to force every single user on the planet to conform to the designers' weaknesses and fetish for control. For example, every Flash intro in the world. Or all of the goddamn fixed-width "experiences" that were either too wide for what users wanted their window to be or so narrow that acres of space were wasted. An approach that surely looked fine in presentation to executives, but much less well for actual users.

The great improvements in CSS have definitely helped. But I think the major changes have been the the explosion of form factors (small laptops, giant desktop monitors, tablets, phones) and the rise of a generation of designers for whom the web is a native medium. The old paradigm got harder to force at the same time there were plenty of people who were thinking in a new way.

Planck wrote, "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." Design, like science, proceeds one funeral at a time. So goodbye, PSD2HTML, and let's quietly put a stake through its heart so it never returns.
But that's at odds with the call for more competition. In a more competitive market, providers would compete to provide faster and faster service in the most densely-populated, highest-value markets. E.g. basically T-Mobile's strategy in the U.S. They spend their limited infrastructure capital on rolling out fast LTE in key markets, while leaving non-urban areas with HSPA or even no service at all.
Be careful diagnosing yourself on the internet. There are a variety of things (some with cures!) that can make it hard to fall asleep or wake up. I'd strongly suggest seeing a specialist if you aren't sleeping well.
rsync -az --delete ~/dropbox/ /volumes/myexternalhdd/

Treat Dropbox like RAID rather than a backup (i.e. RAID is not a backup). I, personally, have a set of rotating hard drives that snapshot data over a month's time. I also buy cheap HDDs that are frozen and forever hold data from a specific date, back a few years. Duplicates are held in a safety deposit box.

Example of cheapo hard drives (I use them in pairs): http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136...
As a fan of Haskell, I've tried to move to xmonad, but realized that most of what I wanted to do to it was make it behave like ratpoison so I moved back. In particular, retaining my screen muscle-memory, and the "commands in a tree under a single initial character, which can be sent with a command" which nicely keeps everything a couple keypresses away while allowing easy logical groupings and still makes sure that key bindings never get in the way of something that I want to send to an application.
Note that your flying providers are huge. The hope of network neutrality is to turn the networks into gatekeepers to eliminate competition.

So say I want to create in my garage, an online store to compete with Amazon selling in the pet rock market. Oh what a pity, all your online shopping traffic got dropped at our border routers. We can "fix things" for you for a modest fee, just like Amazon. Of course we have a minimum payment of $50M/month to "fix" things. Oh you say you can't pay $50M out of your garage? Well our internet isn't for people like you anymore.

So yes, its very good news for large content providers because it eliminates any need for product development and eliminates competition.

The other way it eliminates competition is Amazon might be able to afford a department of a couple people to do nothing all day but negotiate with ISPs, but a startup could never spare the manpower. So startups could only release on TWC or Charter or AT&T or ... rather than everywhere on the internet.
Silly and contradictory enough that it's probably more confusing than not to imagine a Pakistan or Yemen with a united will.

The weak and fractured governments of Pakistan and Yemen want the US to bomb there. Yemen's being so weak it barely deserves the name.
I may be wrong, but I believe this would re-introduce avenues for competitors to lease capacity on -- if properly regulated -- a parity basis with the incumbent's own cost to provide.

Let some government cost accountants loose on these incumbents' books. Then let me buy my capacity from a company that isn't trying to screw me vertically nor horizontally and that doesn't e.g. conscript me into a basic cable TV package when all I want is Internet.

Perhaps then, as well, we would be able to actually segregate infrastructure development and maintenance costs and be sure we are getting what we are paying for. E.g. if my cost goes up, it's because I'm actually getting more in return. At a time when wholesale bandwidth costs have been halving year upon year (at least, as of a couple of years ago), the near doubling of my monthly bill over the past few years is sorely in need of some -- independent and measurable and demonstrable -- justification.

Finally, Internet is no longer a luxury. It's a necessity. With often only a single distributor in many locations, they are effectively a common carrier.

After all the bad behaviour on the part of these companies, I have ZERO sympathy left for them. They've abused their positions. It's time for that abuse to end.

P.S. Yeah, I'm pissed. Probably not the best position from which to comment.

This month's Crapcast bill contained another circa 5.5 % increase -- for nothing. It's been well less than a year since their last increase, and inflation is running far under that figure.

As for build-out costs: I notice when my neighbours (that's one family of two adults) are home on weekends, because my one, rather occasional Netflix stream drops from quality 4 to 3 or not infrequently to 2. They aren't doing diddly to improve capacity/delivery in my neighbourhood.
This is not meant to offend, but your response is essentially socialist in nature. If we keep this discussion within the capitalist framework, then the proper salary is simply $1 more than a competitor is willing to pay said employee. Thus it is arguable that this particular employee was extremely overpaid.
I'm not sure I get why reading a book is so much worse than a reading on an iPad. You mean because of the backlit screen?
I'm not one of those sales-types (at least not yet), so I'm glad to have this info now, even if I missed the window to use it with my last Kickstarter. :)

That leaves me wondering: how well do sales tactics work on selling yourself on things like regular exercise, better food habits, and the like?
If the worker in question accepted the offer, then if seems that the pay was appropriate.
Truth. The div would need a variable height though which would change the design.
>With Scala you feel smart having just got something to work in a beautiful way but when you look around the room to tell your clojure colleague how clever you are, you notice he left 3 hours ago and there is a post-it saying use a Map

I don't get this. Scala has a great collections library, including a Map type. What, exactly, is the author complaining about?
Oh I see - yes I agree that is different
You're doing it the right way. The PSD is a blueprint for what the end result should look like. You implement it the best way possible for use in the browser (gradients, border-radius, etc.). For responsive, either the designer puts together comps for the various breakpoints or there is a discussion about how the main comp will change at various resolutions.

The point about bootstap made in the article I only see as relevant where your goal is to have something that looks standard or use a theme for bootstrap, for anything unique or visually appealing it's often faster to play with certain concepts in photoshop before building it out.

None of these things are really a problem if the designer is really a web designer. You can be backed into a corner real fast when you have print designers designing for the web.
Just to belabor your well made point, here is an example of a final PSD I received from a 'professional agency': (from psdgrade.com)

https://cloudup.com/c5RmHN8t1QZ

https://cloudup.com/cmpmBEYg93c

Thats 27 different font sizes for ONE PAGE of a site. I bet most of this was done through scaling layers to 'fit' into spaces.

There were also 42 layers named some verson of <shape>-n.
Thanks! This will be the first technical paper that I've read in too long.
It is rarely the fix is "something small" when you have dev-manager leading the team of 5.

The actual fix might be small (changing one line), but the real effort to:

1) Make sure there's unit-test, integration-test

2) Make sure nothing breaks

3) Maybe test the deployment script

4) Maybe test the database migration

is rather involved. If the dev-manager knows all of these steps then sure, why not. But that's like saying that QA should be able to do the same thing too (after all, QA should be a little bit more technical and more in-depth than the dev-manager).

While these are nice, I rarely see them work like that.

I'm not against it, but I just don't think that there is "simple fix" when a dev-manager present (because it implies the size of the project and the size of the software).
And no GNU/Linux support...
> Did you not read the part where he said it was his project at Google? You attacked the project.

Did you read what I wrote? Once again, I'm tempted to make the distinction between Daniel and Google clear. I did not attack Daniel, and I did not attack the project. I attacked Google, or more specifically, this claim that Daniel made:

> Google does this stuff for completely altruistic reasons.

Here is my original response to that claim:

> But of course. Just like they help the NSA rape people's privacy for purely altruistic reasons? Don't Be Evil and all, right?

It's simply not accurate to claim I was attacking Daniel or his work at Google.

Even if I had actually attacked the project, that would still be separate from attacking Daniel - he's just doing whatever he's told to do, and most likely without any evil intentions, as I already acknowledged.

> It looks like you got cowed by Daniel's response, and now are just tendentiously refusing to apologize. Maybe just apologize?

There is nothing to apologize for. It's not my problem if Daniel takes arguing against a specific claim he made as an attack against his person, or his work.

> You're an anonymous person with one message ("Google is an evil NSA accomplice") trying to tell the actual person who managed the voting information project at Google that Google had malicious intentions for voting information

Well, Snowden's revelations tell us that Google has been actively helping the NSA spy on people for many years now, long before the Don't Be Evil mantra lost credibility in people's eyes. I simply referred to this fact, to suggest that we already have evidence of distinctly non-altruistic actions on Google's part, and this undermines the credibility of Daniel's claim.
I would much rather my manager (if I had one, which I don't) be a good /manager/ and a non-engineer, rather than being a bad manager and a bad engineer.

I want my manager to have a great engineering background, but not be interested in the actual engineering except for purposes of helping the engineers get their jobs done. In other words, build a good team, remove obstacles and get the heck out of the way.
"I think a lot of tech people are stuck in a bubble, surrounded by other tech savvy people who are ultra dependant on technology and app's in particular which leads to sweeping statements like "the web is dying." I see little evidence to support such an idea at the moment."

Totally agree with this (from the perspective of a web hoster), I think there's a few folks who need to get out of "the valley" a bit more.
Using HTML and JS works great and provides exactly the same interaction you'd see on the final product. I think trying to do anything else (unless you're extremely good at video processing) is insane.
Judging from the comments, "at Gunpoint" is redundant.
Not to argue your point (which is 100% right IMHO), but this decision is pretty right on the merits.

They refused to classify the providers in a way that gave them express statutory authority to promulgate these regulations, and the court called them on it.

I want to see this happen, but the right way is for the FCC to stop pussyfooting around and classify them as common carriers, which they are, so it can regulate them as such.

They are just afraid of the political whining.
Unless the hiring manager wrote this somewhere like an email, I doubt it will be proven at all. Anyway for now it is nothing more than just hearsay.
Netflix along with Google and Microsoft are the companies behind the HTML5 DRM proposal.
I know that you're joking but as someone working in software in the semiconductor industry, building system on chips, I can't help but seeing parallels in modern SoCs and the Commodore Amiga with the "Original Chip Set".

In Amiga, you had the choice between using the CPU, the Copper or the Blitter for certain tasks, e.g. a memset or a memcpy might have been faster to do using the facilities of the chip set, which had direct access to memory.

Similarly, at work we are often making a choice which unit of the SoC (cpu, gpu, copy engine) should be used for a particular task, e.g. a big memset, an image blit or perhaps an alpha blend. Like the OCS chip set in the Amiga, all these various units on modern SoCs have direct access to physical memory.

My educated guess is that most computers will be based on some kind of SoC architectures very soon. There are some experiments being done in putting the DRAM silicon in the same package as the SoC and it may be that in the future, 99% of your computer is just a single silicon chip and the motherboard is there only to connect to peripheral devices.
Does seem a little strange, especially since it has a Unix environment and all the developer goodness that's available on *nix systems...
Ok, cool. But Less is also javascript!
My fellow libertarians:

Milton Friedman, freedomist gadfly, was in favor of government regulation to protect the population from contagion. The regulation and restriction of antibiotics falls firmly within even a minimalist state's purview.

In other words, the government has a clearer mandate to restrict antibiotic use than it has to restrict heroin use.
> The DC Court handles all of these big, Federal cases that make the top of HN.

No, it doesn't. The Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit handles appeals of federal regulatory agency decisions, but -- while this FCC decision is an example of those -- you don't see a lot of them make the top of HN. Most of the "big, federal" cases that make the top of HN are either:

1) criminal cases, which go to trial in the District Court in which the crime occurred, and for appeal to the Circuit Court in which that District Court is located (which might happen to be the DC Circuit if the trial was originally in the District Court for the District of Columbia, but usually that's not the case); or

2) coyright cases, which again go through any of the District Courts for trial, and the corresponding Circuit Court for appeals; or

3) patent cases, which go to trial in the District Court in which the crime occurred, and for appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal (not DC) Circuit.

While the DC Circuit is very important, its not that commonly involved in cases that make the front page of HN.
Doubly so if the company is considering providing any sort of relocation assistance, sponsorship, or other similar things which may help the employee realize his move from India to the US -- a move which may offer well over $10k/yr worth of benefits to his overall personal well-being (and his family's).
Guy created this marketing tool on suggestion from someone on Reddit
imagelessCaptcha.js: Imageless Captcha removes the need for ugly captchas
I find that I retain things I hear much better than things I read.
As another (minor) clarification to the article, where it says:

If your finger was the size of the Earth, you could feel the difference between houses from cars

I think it would be easier to visualize this way:

If the Earth was the size of an orange, your finger could feel the difference between houses from cars
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_Amiga_chipset

The major difference between an Amiga and a PC (which was essentially "cpu only") was that the Amiga had a chipset with some units that were somewhat programmable.
Here's something that confuses me, and maybe someone with better know-how can explain this:

1: The one demo of Mantle I have seen so far[1] says they are GPU bound in their demo, even after underclocking the CPU processor.

2: Kaveri supports Mantle, but claims to be about 24% faster than Intel HD processors, which are decent, but hardly in the ballpark of the type of powerful graphics cards used in the demo.

So combining those two, aren't these two technologies trying to pull in different directions?

[1] Somewhere around the 26 minute mark: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIWyf8Hyjbg
German Nazis and German Communists (who were very much not the fluffy Euro-Communists of the Cold War) made up a majority of the German population. The ends to which people were forming active, violent militias were different, but when massive groups of people are taking up arms, a society has chosen the path of violence. German elites, conservatives, and moderates actively chose to let the Nazis take power, because it seemed superior to the alternative at the time.
This is why I'm really happy with the Clojure community. People in Clojure get that types are useful and important. You don't have the "I don't understand that, so I'm going to call it unimportant" attitude. Instead, you have people using Clojure as a lens to explore and, one hopes, solve the problem-- even when it seems so difficult as to be almost infeasible (such as static typing on a Lisp).

Clojure is a dynamically typed, JVM language-- now. (However, ClojureScript is also pretty far along.) It might not always be that way. It will evolve according to the needs of computer science over the next 20+ years.
This stuck out to me:

"Police officers have the privilege, the right to use force to overcome resistance," said Ira Salzman, a defense attorney who often represents police officers. "When you have the law allowing use of force, that is a tremendous protection."

Everything that has come out about this case is stranger than the one before.
Nothing. Just thought it captured the sentiment of obtuse manuals that manage to make what seems like a simple task overly complex.
Great point. Does anybody know the historical origin of the notion that there are "designers" who can be ignorant about their medium?

When I talk to, say, friends who paint, it's a very specific activity for them. They know a lot about actual paints, because they do the painting. Pre-web, I knew people who were print designers, or packaging designers, or logo designers. They too knew the details of their medium intimately.

The two theories I've been able to come with were that a) it's an artifact of the quick rise of the web, where the hunger for various design-related skills quickly pulled in a lot of people, or b) that there was a market niche for design agencies to sell a lot of "design", and so they created the pretense.

Either way, that would put the origin in the early multimedia/web era. But I'm wondering if it goes back further.