skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My take is that the story is that the story is the story. It's contrary to the standard narrative - a narrative which has used Forrester and similarly squishy measurements of perceptions as evidence of Apple's unquestioned superiority for many years.

E.g. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Adaringfireball.net+Forreste...

As for the sample size, 7500 is plenty if properly selected. If the selection process is poor in ways that are not accounted for in the analysis, then a larger bad data set won't make the analysis any more accurate.
My reason would be that donating makes you feel richer. It's not about the amount but making a habit of feeling like you have at least some resources to help other people.

You say you don't donate because you don't feel rich, but maybe you don't feel rich precisely because you don't donate.

If you don't feel rich, you're probably doing all kinds of other things to sabotage your financial success that are more than canceling out the cost of a little charity here and there.
I always find that thought fascinating "demographic X doesn't spend money". It seems to me that most people I have met in my life spend all their money - just on different things.

So the 4chan fans probably spend their money on SOMETHING, the question is really how much? and on what?

Even if you assume that they are all teenagers with no income, in the US they would be spending thousands of their parents dollars per year on some sort of stuff.

Source - I have 4 kids
>To me saying "some men" is like giving the "good men" a cookie

To me, saying "some men" is being precise with language and not falling into generalization. "Men", in common usage, refers to individuals that are male, not a "political class".
$250 a year for practically nothing? I'm not sure that'd work.