skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nonsense. Just putting GCC source code in to the BSD repository wouldn't magically spread the requirement that the entire project become GPL any more than keeping a copy on my hard drive requires I give the FSF the complete contents of my /home directory. What matters is the dependency/linkage.

The GCC 'runtime library exception' firewalls all 'target code' from the GPLv3, and even allows proprietary preprocessors, linkers and assemblers (but nothing that would involve modifying GCC to split what it does in to more granular stages)
Taxation deprives the victim of property. Distributing derivative works of OSS does not deprive the OSS authors of anything. Distributing works that use OSS as a library does not deprive the OSS authors of anything. Running a service which does not distribute OSS but depends on the OSS internally does not deprive the OSS authors of anything.

Of course, people can use whatever license they want. I personally favor licenses that maximize the rights of my users. Hopefully, though, you can now see that the combination of positions you mentioned is a consistent one.
Startup lessons
From InDesign to App in 5 clicks: Digital publishing made easier than ever
So, when can we use 1.2.0 stable? Any guess?
This is in the context of Icahn announcing he had a large position in Apple and had a phone call with Tim Cook. This then led to a 5% increase in share price. Basically 2 tweets worth $17 Billion in Apple's market value.
> Sometimes long-term freedom does require constraint on permissible action.

mpyne nailed it. If anyone is looking for further discussion of this concept check out "Social Contract Theory."[1][2]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contract

[2] http://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/

Sidebar: It doesn't hurt that you get to say cheeky things like "Before the GPL life was nasty, brutish and short."
Your thinking is way too complicated. The argument is much simpler!

PRISM? Oh, nobody knows around here anymore how that thing works. Haven't you read that 90% of the administrators were let go? [1] Request? Well, this might take a while...

[1] http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/nsa-cut-system-administrat...
i hit "casablanca" the other day from microsoft.. what impress me is that is open source and it also runs in linux. (not even in my wild dreams o would predict this to happen one day)

anyway.. looking at the source its pretty decent, and go right to the point.. of course its focused in HTTP/REST..

theres a bultin IO scheduler and a concurrent task system..
from microsoft.. who would say so :)
Now that you can post material comments on Twitter, getting access to twitter accounts just became much more valuable on the black market.
Medical Ethicists conclude After-birth Abortion same as killing Unborn Babies
>the fact that we should

Can't have a factual should. Shoulds are normative.

>What is kind of useless is a word that can mean some thing or its opposite

Is the word really useless or indeed useful if no one can provide a 'real' example of actual ambiguity between the two meanings? Furthermore, it's not as if ambiguity between one meaning and an opposite meaning is the greatest ambiguity there is-- if anything, it makes it particularly obvious which meaning the speaker intends.
Apple also does well in their modifier key placement by having a narrower space bar that extends from "C" to "M" on most keyboards, meaning the modifier keys next to the space bar are easily reachable with thumbs.
Unfortunately the passengers inside still have high inertia. It doesn't matter if the capsule stops without damage if all the people inside are crushed by G-forces.
Original paper: http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2012/03/01/medethics-2011-1...
As I remember, at the time Apple started Clang, GCC wasn't nearly as clean. The various stages (parsing, compiling, optimization, etc) were not cleanly separated/documented so using the compiler's parser for syntax highlighting wasn't really possible. GCC has improved quite a bit since Clang/LLVM showed up in many of these areas.

Even if GCC had very clean separation between the steps, the FSF's interpretation is that you couldn't use the GCC parser for something like highlighting/suggestions the way Apple does in XCode without making all of XCode GPL.

It's a perfectly fair interpretation. I think making the opposite case would be quite difficult. But it shouldn't be surprising that Apple wouldn't want to open up all of XCode. I also don't blame Apple for not wanting to continue to re-implement parts of GCC and try to stay bug-for-bug on parsing when the only reason you can't re-use the same code is licensing.
They're not avoiding Netflix only because it doesn't pay enough, they're avoiding it because the medium threatens pretty much everything about their current way of doing business. It's deeper than just money.
A far more insidious problem nowadays in terms of imposed structure is the habit people have of making a list (as the OP does) as if this is a substitute for properly structuring their thoughts - to me that's a cop-out and not far above no structure at all. Usually the results are then labelled top n x or n things you didn't know about x and contain more than n examples of x, without any attempt at an introduction or a conclusion.

http://www.paulgraham.com/nthings.html
Samsung reportedly delays Tizen development
Smartphone 'successfully produced' in North Korea
I've this guy on TV a long time ago. I'm certain it was at the 90's, but I don't remember the exact year.

It's not a new idea in any way, and was certainly invented more than once. Yet, it was this guy that (by luck) made the life of several people better by communicating it.
"This question was removed from Stack Overflow for reasons of moderation."
Special Committee to Consider Joint Venture, Strategic Partnership With Canadian Paint Pro.Com http://youtu.be/a-RAU3B_xpg
It's good to shop around, especially here in California, one of the states where graduates from non-accredited law schools can join the bar. :-)

I can't see a reasonable way of establishing bona fides other than creating a strong implication/inference of "national security".

(My wife is a federal attorney, and it is disappointing how warped "the government's" perspectives are on rights and what is reasonable.)
What a terrific time to be in business. If Microsoft had promptly and candidly revealed how badly the Surface RT was doing in the marketplace, that would have become a self-fulfilling prophecy (consumers would have been warned to avoid the product), then they would have been sued by stockholders for destroying their own product's future through excessive candor. Instead, they're being sued for not revealing the unattractiveness of their product until the conclusion was inescapable.

It's not a question of whether you'll be sued, but by whom, and for what.
Google Open-Sources Gumbo: C Library for Parsing HTML5
Well I guess judging by the poster's rage, they should have got a better return and folded that into another project. I'm just trying to empathise with the anger of taking risks with relatively low returns using public money.

AFAIC Tesla upheld their end of the bargain and society is up by quite a bit. This is in stark contrast to other bullshit that the US government has funded which is wasteful at best. War, war on drugs, war on privacy, bankers, ...
I don't know where he got his stats, but the energy per passenger for a train cannot be right. CSX advertises daily they can move a ton of freight 400 miles for a dollar. A person weighs much less than a ton. Granted there are additional expenses to make a human comfortable, but these are relatively low fixed costs --you know like a chair.
Probably doesn't help but knowing how much you pay is a problem for me, given that it is such a simple service and how much you are paying I feel like it'd be better if I spent the 2 hours to re-implement it and setup my own VPS. 2 hours + 50 dollars == 10 months of service or 50 dollars == 1 month of service. I have a feeling that a lot of the HN crowd would use your service if it was around but we all have hosting solutions we can use to re-implement it so honestly it becomes a choice of giving you money or spending two hours (and it looks like another commenter already implemented a clone). It seems like more like a value-add to another service like Pingdom than something that will ever be self sustaining (this coming from someone that runs a few out of pocket things for people that will never be self sustaining). To be blunt, I doubt you'll break even and if you are having trouble affording keeping the server up you should probably kill it. If want to give something to the community that doesn't cost money you could always release the server impl on github.

But if you still want to give it a go and seeing as you weren't getting much in the way of answers to your question (my answer included) I searched and it seems the same question got asked on HN recently and there were some more useful links: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6113484 From everything I've heard I'd try Stripe first (no first hand exp myself)
Oh, I wasn't actually complaining there. It's totally appropriate, we were just wondering when it would happen. (It was actually useful as a channel to find app ids that were having issues.)
They are easy to refactor (search and replace .btn-mini to .btn-xs in .css and .html files) and if you're depending on betas to remain consistent you're not being realistic. I've done quite a bit in Bootstrap and I appreciate the small names, doubly so when they are consistent.
Personally, I like the new update for this -> http://i.imgur.com/FiDrPcb.png
And you missed mine. I made a willful-and-fully-knowledgable choice to conflate nodes and lists. I understood then and still understand that it shifts complexity from the call to the return value. How is explaining motives for that decision "entirely unrelated"?

I also, knowing that complexity was shifted to the return value, created an each() function that solves that problem entirely. It allows (even encourages) you to handle the result exactly like a proxy/wrapper. Again, how is that not related?

Yes, i am doing something unconventional, something that failed for others in the past. In fact, i'm doing several things like that. I'm also extending the DOM, not even using prototypes, but manually! Now, why don't ya'll explain to me all the conventional wisdom about those things too. I've gone against it, therefore i must be ignorant, right?
I would be quite interested in Gumbo as the backend to the awesome pure Python but otherwise rather-slow https://github.com/html5lib/html5lib-python, which actually has great whitelisting/cleaning facilities but is easily an order of magnitude slower than lxml's more limited clean_html.

PyPy JIT and html5lib is about 8x faster as it is cpython.
I've been upgrading one of my apps to RC1 the past 3 days. I think it's great! Lot more easier to get it responsive. I was always having troubles with nested columns on the previous version. Things seem to work a lot more better now! Was about to tackle an issue about getting column structure to remain same on phone devices but looks like RC2 takes care of that with .col-xs !
Those extra bytes add up every day. ;)
I agree with the policies you mention, and I'd say that they serve the greater good of society. I would not, however, try to claim that they are "freedom policies" -- to the contrary, I'd say they're examples of how our quality of life can be enhanced by giving up some freedoms.
Just because you can do it without much effort doesn't mean less experienced people can. Crawling can be a barrier to some people.
You, sir, just made my night.
Why do you feel that? There's no benefit to a company in maintaining an ever evolving and complex fork of a project as compared to contributing back the non business essential parts so that their fork can be smaller.
Well, you didn't say that initially. You said you didn't trust MIT to properly investigate itself, and to support your opinion you linked to another person with the same opinion. But that person is also someone you don't trust? I'm not sure how that was intended to help you. But that doesn't really matter to me anymore... I've lost interest in your opinion. Sorry.
Not true. Just see MySQL for one example. Before Oracle bought MySQL AB (for $1 billion) their revenues on commercial support for their largely GPLv2 software was in the tens of millions. The same may already be true for Monty Program AB who provide commercial support for MariaDB. The closer you get to infrastructure, the more being open source is a competitive advantage.
Haha, how far has society fallen that not being distracted by something is considered out-of-the-ordinary respectful?

I agree with you, I think I'd feel the same about a lull, unless they attempt to re-initiate the conversation after a bit. But I also assume people could be expecting an important message or are contractually obligated to be aware of their messages, so I feel they should go ahead and check during a pause (but maybe announce why).
Clouds with Silver Lining: Freemium Text Analytics
A Critique of the Structure of U.S. Elementary School Mathematics (.PDF)
Some people -- myself included -- think TDD is not a good way to develop software. And I use SVN and TFS... I've tried git and frankly I want to solve problems, not introduce more with my source control provider. I want something that "just works" and git just isn't it (and repeated branching/merging has NEVER worked well in the long run IMO).

CI... all for it, must have IMO.

Remember, just because you think how you do your job is the "only way" you're not always right :) And I'd say a weekly release cycle sounds like a griiiiind.

(Edit, I run a team of 10-11 and have to work with developers from interns to senior with 10+ years of experience... so it's not like I'm just cowboy coding all in a vacuum... and we're reasonably successful at what we do :D)
Weird... MICROSOFT.COM.IS.A.STEAMING.HEAP.OF.FUCKING-BULLSHIT.NET, A.STEAMING.HEAP.OF.FUCKING-BULLSHIT.NET won't resolve. The rest of it does fine.. com.a.steaming.heap.of.fucking-bullshit.net included.

How is it jumping from steaming. to com.a.steaming. ??
They must have heard that todays smartphones have the same power as the Apollo computer. I cant wait for the "launch"
Yes, code that's unprepared for variable input can break when input varies. So use code that is prepared for it, like each().

And thank you for your anecdote, but i have never and will never stop doing something merely because some guy on the internet points out that some completely other person in a different context failed to pull it off.

How else can i spell this out... you do not need to worry about the distinction between nodes and node lists, if you just use each(). It's a proxy function that deals with the abstraction for you, just like jQuery's wrapper object does.

YOU. DO. NOT. NEED. AN. OBJECT. TO. HAVE. AN. ABSTRACTION.

Thank you and good night.
Woops. I didn't see Merced.
Ah so if you think you have the right to the fruit of your labor, I assume that means you're a communist?

That seems pretty in step with the GPL.
In terms of response, chrisblizzard has done almost a better job than Twilio did last month. Do we expect a full post-mortem, or is that where facebook will fall short?
Neon -> 2,090mph

Krypton -> 2505mph

Xenon -> 2,438mph

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=speed+of+sound+in+neon

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=speed+of+sound+in+krypt...

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=speed+of+sound+in+xenon

But even Neon (which is more abundant in the atmosphere than Helium) would cost ridiculous amounts of money to use.
It could be nice to cross-compile for OSX/iOS on FreeBSD. I could do without the Xcode bloat.
And flatten the battery on my laptop/phone faster.
> Aren't I just charging more for A - which gets paid - but needlessly filling B with programming?

The idea is that the subsidy takes B from losing money being profitable.

Truthfully, only the individual networks know whether the subsidy makes them additional profit or allows them to profitably air networks that they wouldn't otherwise be able to.
Looks awesome, as does 8tracks which I hadn't heard of until now. If you're looking for more color schemes, I like http://colorbrewer2.org for colorblind-friendly palettes.
https://github.com/eternicode/bootstrap-datepicker
Sipping on my morning coffee and reading HN. First Bootstrap RC2, and now AngularJS 1.2. I'm going to be busy over the next few days! :-)
That make me giggle, just the whole mix of twitter and an SEC notice.
FYI this issue still isn't resolved for a number of people. I'm still waiting on several.
That's a very misleading essay.

"It is that, whereas free software is always also open source, open source software does not necessarily have to be free software. That is, software can be open source without granting its users the additional freedoms that free software guarantees."

This is incorrect, and the example given was incorrect. The terms are identical in meaning. Open source was coined to be a trademark for free software.
Yo, the point is that the complexity is there because the well-intentioned and simple underlying systems were not properly scaled to meet the demands of modern applications. At no point does he suggest that you should eschew the tools that are in place to maintain the current complexity – that would be nonsensical, as you pointed out. He's arguing that we should use the system as it was designed, if that's at all possible, or re-architect the system to handle modern application complexity without increasing system complexity unnecessarily. Achieving this would be near impossible – see Plan9, Minix, VPRI, and Squeak for "failed" attempts – hence this being a rant and not a serious proposal.

Note also that Ryan is a mathematician. Mathematicians hate engineering because there's nothing to protect real-world systems from little accidents that compound over time. No proof, no piece of code, no matter how elegant, can reverse the thousands of bad design decisions that have resulted in the modern Linux ecosystem.
No, it's really not in anything but an inaccurate tribal sense. The FSF has recognized BSD/MIT-style licenses as "free software" since before the Free Software Definition was published. The Open Source Definition recognized copyleft licenses in its very first drafts too.

What you're thinking about is the fact that the "Open Source Movement" (and its formalization in OSI) were created largely to decouple the FSF (really RMS specifically) from the broader movement and remove his status as a default evangelist. Whether this is a good or bad idea is a flame war for another day (and it's been had more times than needed over the past 15 years), but it has absolutely nothing to do with the content of the licenses.
My advice is that it is time to interview them. Why do they do what they do, what are their pain points, are they open to trying X to fix pain point Y, and so on. Interviewing is a two way street, and it may just be how you ended up wording your question, but I don't get the sense that you really know the answers to any of those questions. None of us can really answer that part for you.

My other advice is that if you are early in your career, it doesn't hurt to be exposed to different practices. Even if you ultimately decide that they should have used CI and such, you will see another approach which may perfectly apply to some job in the future. (Almost) No job is perfect - there will be a mix of interesting/dull work, great/bad practices, too many meetings or not enough communication, and so on. If it doesn't see like you'd be miserable there, why not go on over, build your UI/Javascript chops, and build it into your next job?
In particular, Apple shipped GCC with Darwin.
The tough part about that for the networks is building out the infrastructure and giving up all the free advertising that the cable companies give them.

By packaging their content as a standalone service, a la HBO Go, they've now given up being bundled in tiers with other networks. And they've got to build out their own delivery networks & apps. Or... they can join up with groups of other networks, create a service that advertises and bundles networks together and takes care of all the infrastructure.

Shit.

We just built cable again.
It is a meme that movies have all settled on using a blue/teal and orange color palette nowadays, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. There is one prominent movie in the middle which is almost entirely orange and blue, which I believe to be Aladdin[1], but other than that and a couple around it, the color palettes seem pretty similar, although much darker, more saturated and perhaps somewhat choppier. This could be because they are animated films and thus don't need to create contrast with human skin tones, which are somewhere on the orangeish spectrum (according to TVTropes discussion of this phenomenon)[2].

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Walt_Disney_Animation_...

2: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/OrangeBlueContras...
> And I don't want to use crappy and shitty tools.

Neither does Ryan. That's what the whole rant is about. He just wants to make software for users without having to hack through the forest of bad design decisions that is the modern Linux system.
gcc 4.2.1 was the last version to use GPLv2. Later versions switched to GPLv3, which the BSD guys couldn't swallow. From skimming the answer, I think it's pretty clear that the switch wasn't due to technical reasons, but that Clang/LLVM is now "good enough".

It seems reasonable for FreeBSD to favour BSD licensing.
Well I mean he did invent cellular automata.
He mentions that in the video. The way Lisps are structured make it simpler for voice recognition.
Thankfully their new 2FA actually looks decent, although presumably you could just go after a known user's already-authorized client device for easy and profitable lulz/great justice.
The most surprising information I discovered curing RSI is:

http://aaroniba.net/articles/tmp/how-i-cured-my-rsi-pain.htm...

which recommends

http://www.amazon.com/Mindbody-Prescription-Healing-Body-Pai...
Wow ... thanks for the info!
The thing is, if you're not doing some sort of incredibly bloated production, you don't need 10,000 people to make a movie. Most movies are NOT Lord of the Rings.

For instance, one of the best critically received movies of the last decade was probably No Country For Old Men. Budget? $25 million. Made back well over triple that at the US box office alone.

The King's Speech? $15 million, made over $135 million

Argo? $44 million, and that had lots of expensive location shoots in the middle east

The Hurt Locker? $15 million

Slumdog Millionaire? $15 million

Crash? $6.5 million

Million Dollar Baby? $30 million

All movies that did very well at the box office, and were made for $25 million or less (with one exception). They also all won the Best Picture oscar. So there is PLENTY of evidence that you can make a great movie without getting anywhere near a 9-figure price tag.

Of course, for "indie" films, you can go well under that. "Clerks" cost about as much a new car. The original Texas Chainsaw Massacre was barely over $100k....the first Saw movie was made for just over $1m and grossed 100 times that.
> for developers to build their designs

Don't you see a problem right there? In my opinion, it should at least come bundled with an optional style (the old Bootstrap2 style would be fine), so that we could at least use it for fast prototyping. In its current state, it's kind of useless since I'm gonna need a designer from day 1 anyway, because it looks terrible by default.