skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yep, the zindus addon has this problem. Very hard (impossible?) to do something automatic and risk free.

I'm not happy with the answer that I settled on with zindus: http://zindus.com/i/reporting-bugs
because there is a lot of sensitive information in a logfile.

Even when someone gives permission and sends you a logfile, if there is sensitive data it creates a maintenance burden on your end to deal with it appropriately.

One (not very good) idea: pass the diagnostic data through some sort of anonymizer. Unappetizing because it would involve a lot of work and would need heuristics that could only be learned through trial and error.
... and it's fun too.
Dilbert.com nerfs their RSS feed
Yes, there is.

If we see a wave of cancers among Fukushima workers, that would change matters, but as things stand now it seems much, much more likely that Mr Yoshida got sick for reasons that have nothing to do with the radiation.

I don't entirely discount the possibility of a cover-up, but grieving relatives who have somebody to blame are kind of hard to silence.
It looks like the Pointy Haired Bosses have overrun dilbert.com :-/
I think automotive grease is roughly sterile as well, but I don't want to have it smeared all over my hands all the time. There are extremely practical reasons to not want urine on your hands other than the transmission of bacteria. And not illogical, either -- the smell is not pleasant, and it would certainly be a social impediment.
OTR encryption is pretty good in this regard.

"If you lose control of your private keys, no previous conversation is compromised."

http://www.cypherpunks.ca/otr/
I like how he says that "mobile web apps are slow and always will be" (not a direct quote), but then dismisses asm.js as "it woudn't be a JavaScript anymore" so it doesn't count.

The point of asm.js (if I understand it correctly) is that you can use JavaScript in way similar to Python -- you can make your application in high-level language, and then, after profiling, rewrite the performance critical parts into lower-level, less powerful, but faster language.

That means, it still is "web app" but it can perform reasonably.
Nice story, you dance well, but you should definitely choose better dance for your final dance in the video. What you showed looked like you really wanted to use bathroom but tehre wasn't any... Sorry about that, but otherwise, very nice.
Customizing Genesis Focus Child Theme The Easy Way
I can definitely see the value in connecting the systems -- that's without a doubt very important (and a very good reason Microsoft has a corner on the market)

What I was more getting at was that by not focusing on interaction/dealing with centralization or supporting interaction between multiple services, teams usually move faster (less process, if no other gains -- no one has to check your outputs for compatability,etc), and get to do more feature-development.

But then again, as a lazy person who loves open source stuff, any attempt at something so ambitious is awesome I think. I feel like a lemming for saying anything bad about it.

[EDIT] - Taking another look at the tour -- It is pretty amazing. A lot of companies are charging for LESS functionality
> Of course, this is exactly what anyone familiar with the tragedy of the commons would have expected. Self-regulation is not nearly as common or as effective as many would have us believe. Those squatters could yield this quasi-public space to others and work from home.

I'm not sure you get the concept of these coffee shops. When I pay a coffee more than 5 dollars, I am not paying for the 0.1 dollar that the coffee actually costs to make, I am paying for a place to sit as well and do something with my time. Be it 10 minutes or 3 hours, it does not matter. You are not paying for the coffee. I consider it part of the service. I know for once that if I can't stay in these coffee shops I wouldn't even consider paying that outrageous amount just for a drink.

This being said, I don't really like going to SB or places like that, but when I do I certainly don't for the drink only.
Longer explanation of why there is no SSL in Varnish can be found here: https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/trunk/phk/ssl.html.
That probably would be easier, but I wonder if there's still a number of people who might want to rent a desk for just a few hours.
Before I looked I thought it was going to be about tools that are rubbish for making websites.

Possibly the makers of the listed resources & tools will not want their product related to a word synonymous with crap.
> You are correct in the first instance, however, the law does direct FISC to transmit records to SCOTUS upon writ of certiorari.

Unless I'm missing something, it directs FISC to transmit records under seal to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (FISCR) for appeals, and FISCR to do so to SCOTUS.

> So at least in the case that someone wants to actually appeal one, it's not kept from SCOTUS See 50 USC 1803(b)

1803(a), for appeal from FISC to FISCR, and 1803(b) for appeal from FISCR to SCOTUS, only provides for appeal by the government against denial of a warrant.
I think HN has long passed the point where the passing of a community member has any effect on trolls. It's Eternal September.

http://jseliger.wordpress.com/2012/01/15/commenting-communit...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3468102

This was a pretty good example of something similar that happened an year back, and I'm sure there are more examples (I just never bothered to pay attention to them).
I know you're just providing a hypothetical example, but I think it's common for services provided by doctors or a hospital emergency room to cost quite a bit more than $100; in many cases an order of magnitude more. At the end of the day, I do agree that a hospital will or should make a collection decision based on a cost benefit analysis of some kind, but I think that decision will be to collect a good portion of the time.
A Russian cafe Ziferblat has been doing just that in Russia for two years already. The model was pioneered by a very passionate and modest guy called Vanya Mitin.

Actually, the article mentions it:

>Owner Daria Volkova, 24, was inspired by similar cafes in Russia, where she is originally from.

I don't want to sound mean; it's just that Vanya Mitin did really exciting things here and a lot of copycats used his model (which is of course how market works). Kudos to Daria for mentioning where the idea comes from.
FISC warrants certainly have an enforcement mechanism - FISC allows for show cause and other motions to force compliance.

also
"Not with regard to FISC warrants. Perhaps with regard to pen registers and trap-and-trace orders under FISA, issued by a judge (or magistrate judge) of the FISC, but those are distinct from surveillance warrants."

If by "FISA warrant", you mean production orders or surveillance orders to electronic providers, this is wrong.

See 50 USC 1861(f) and 50 USC 1881a(h)

Both make clear, as do the FISC rules, that FISA warrants and production orders may be challenged in FISA court by a party.

If by FISA warrants, you mean something the government can do on it's own without the help of anyone else, then yes, you are correct, you would have to challenge this when they use the info against you.
Http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&pub=hassanmx
I need a valid Url.
> IMHO Ruby is just now coming fully into its own, and is, for a young language

Young? Ruby is 18 years old, it's certainly not a young language.
Very nice re-design, but you wouldn not be my choice to get tickets. You should invest more time in getting best deals. I am looking to travel next march from Beijing to Prague and on your site this trip starts at $650 while on other places I get get tickets as low as $530
What's your Twitter genotype? - Predicting future behaviour
ATC would not know the stall speeds for every model and configuration of aircraft that land every day. That's not their job.
That's quite a weird angle. Surely I can express unhappiness about a product's performance without being asked to fix it or to shut up?
Munich has not only migrated its administration to open source solutions, but even sends its citizens open source OS CDs.

People slowly begin to understand, it seems.
No, because of the other sections (50 USC 1881(a), 50 USC 1861(f)) that allow for party review to FISCR, then they also allow you to get to SCOTUS from there.

So it depends on what FISC did :)

I agree that it appears that in the case FISA has authorized something that requires no outside help (IE the government is using government resources), you theoretically have no recourse until they use it against you and you challenge it.

However, the question was about Yahoo/et all, which don't fall under this provision.
They fall under others, where they are ordering production or interception by someone else.

For example, 50 USC 1861(f) says "on petition by the Government or any person receiving such order for writ of certiorari"

In general, Congress can't keep a federal question in an article III court from eventually being appealed to SCOTUS.
To the degree they have, it would likely be held unconstitutional.

While Congress is certainly welcome to add to the supreme court's appellate jurisdiction, it's pretty well established that even though the constitution's literal text technically allows congress to remove appellate jurisdiction from the supreme court, doing such a thing is often unconstitutional if it leaves no remedy anywhere.

The literal text being:
"The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States ...

In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make."

Congress could, theoretically, remove the supreme court's appellate jurisdiction for everything. In practice, the supreme court has held this unconstitutional, under things like Justice Story's theory doing so would violate the Constitution's mandatory grant of jurisdiction over such claims to the judiciary as a whole.

IE the part that says "the judicial power shall extend to all cases"
Ah, the tyranny of structurelessness: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tyranny_of_Structurelessnes...

Seriously - in the absence of formal power structures, informal ones will always form, and they are often less accountable and fair than formal ones.
It is an India centric OTA. I am not even sure why it is on the front page of hacker news. It is very big here though.
Firefox 22 broke compatibility with Selenium
مسلسل الكبير اوى الجزء الثالث
> 50 USC 1803(b) specifically provides that the record will be transmitted to SCOTUS upon write of certiorari.

1803(b) provides that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review will do that if the government appeals the denial of a surveillance warrant by that court (which would itself be on the government's appeal of a denial by the FISC) to the Supreme Court.

> The injured party would normally file a writ of certiorari with SCOTUS after losing in FISC. This is specifically provided for.

Not in the provision you point to, which is exclusively for government appeals of denials of warrants in non-adversarial proceedings, they don't provide any "injured party" any appeal path (and the process they apply to is one that an "injured party" would never be aware of in the first place.)
I can't really see how charging this much to ease people's suffering is humanly possible. Sure Surgery Center was a lot cheaper than the rest, but even that is still expensive. For example, if I want to gosurgery center and get an brain/heart surgery, I'd be looking at possibly $500 in overnight fees but not really anything else.

How is anyone inhumane enough to start a business like these hospitals? Any medical care should be available to everyone.
Breaking a finger shouldn't cost $2805 either. Countries like USA think they're superiour but yet they do not help their fellow citizens. If they would drop the war on the rest of the world(incl their own) they would probably afford to provide free medical care as well.
What does the T stand for in RTFT?
How to make a simple computer program - Using Notepad
Relevant poll: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6017918
Australian local council intercepted phone, email data to hunt litterbugs
What your call "theory that it should be falsifiable" is in fact the very base of science. And this principle (among others) served us quite well for the last few hundred years, leading to progress, understanding, knowledge, inventions and innovations.

Of course you can apply lower standards, such as "having some good-sounding arguments is all you nedd", but then the results become quickly worse.
While I agree that Haskell is a great language and everyone should learn it because it's fun to play with it, I think solution to author's problems (and as a current evolution step) would be something like Kotlin.

It's Java-like language (no need to manage pointers), and it doesn't have null-pointer problem, but it's still high-level imperative OOP language.

While many people say that they're code in Haskell is easier to read, since it has this "side-effect-free" guarantees, for me it seemed as not true for some time recently. In Haskell, when your code gets complicated (and starts to have some patterns you want to omit in typing), you start writing Monads. And when you start writing monads, your code gets harder to read since you need not only consider the code, but also keep (>>=) operator (all of them, if you use multiple monads combined via transformers) in your head for every pair of lines. Your code can suddenly have something like global variables (dynamic scoping) hidden in monad (as with State monad), it's flow can be changed dramatically and different other surprises.
Just Wordpress with the "Publish" theme: http://wordpress.org/themes/publish
Plato's academy (and most of the ancient academies) were not built to "find out who was the best" at X or Y. They were built to a) teach current ideas and b) develop new ones.

The problem with post-scholastic (and I would argue even scholastic) thought is that we've mixed up the two roles. Grading (as we know it now) is a relatively new invention... probably invented around the late 18th century at Cambridge.

And yet these non-sorting educational institutions still produced Newton, Galileo, Augustine, and so many others.
Medical schools are free to set their own limits on the number of students they admit. But they aren't going to admit more students than they predict can find a residency spot. It would look bad to have a high percentage of your students not be able to find a residency.

The real reason why there are fewer doctors is that it simply doesn't make any economic sense to be a doctor anymore. You need too much school, at too high a price, and you push off any real earning potential 6-9 years away from your peers. If you specialize, you can add an extra 2-4 years on top of that. And you really don't make enough over the long run to justify the lost opportunity costs.

So yes, there is a shortage of doctors, but that isn't going to change anytime soon.
This is more your anger speaking than any real direct experience, unless you've worked Obama or other Presidents.
Take a look at this quote:

Let's say you and I have a chat in the corridor or the conference room and the result of this chat is that we converge to the view that we need an additional software engineer or animator or artist or hardware person.

The people dealing with software were called "engineers", and the ones dealing with hardware "persons". Huh.
Eve-Online player loses a $9000 digital spaceship
If there's a shortage of doctors we could increase the supply or examine whether we need fully trained doctors for certain more basic services in the first place. There are plenty of beneficial/ necessary medical procedures that don't require an MD's expertise.
The definition of a bad word is a word that is censored.

As soon as you stop censoring the word it is no longer a bad word. So no one will be all that interested in saying it, and will invent a new bad word.
"When they score the winning point or sell their company for millions — you're seeing them in their moment of glory. What you don't see is the thousands of hours of preparation. You don't see the self doubt, the lost sleep, the lonely nights spent working. You don't see the moment they started. The moment they were just like you, wondering how they could ever be good."

This. Too often we hyperbolize the achievement at the expense of the work. Important to realize and appreciate that no one backs into success accidentally.
read his book.
You guyz are amazing. I have been following your website (and a regular customer) for some time now.

It was SO very refreshing to see that you made the flight search function Single Page Application.

The newer even Flat design along with EXCELLENT UX design make your service very pleasant to use. You guys are the BEST tavel site IMO in India by leaps and bounds.

Keep up the good work.. Who's your UX person ?
> No, because of the other sections (50 USC 1881(a), 50 USC 1861(f)) that allow for party review to FISCR, then you can get to SCOTUS from there.

To the extent that's true, the appeal provisions from FISCR to SCOTUS are also in those sections (or closer to them), not in 1803(b), which is a nonsequitur in any situation other than the government appeal of a denial of a warrant.

> In general, Congress can't keep a federal question in an article III court from eventually being appealed to SCOTUS.

Not true; Congress can -- and has -- removed questions within the Article III domain of the judiciary from the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, it only cannot do so for those questions expressly within the Constitutionally-defined original jursidiction of the Supreme Court. It has even done so with regard to specific cases already being heard in the court.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurisdiction_stripping
A non-censored world would be much much worse - for you!

In such a world you could say all those things - and no one would care, and you would be sad that you were not able to say anything offensive.

Imagine a world where swear worlds did not even exist. That's the world you seem to want.
Haskell certainly has a big learning curve, but the experience will be much more rewarding than learning Clojure or F#. Haskell is a (relatively) uncompromising language and Clojure and F# are really just trying to take some of the features of Haskell and bring them into the mainstream. So if you learn F# or Clojure it may help you if you ever try to learn Haskell, but if you learn Haskell, F# and Clojure will be trivial to learn.
I am not saying you are an adherent to this movement, but to my uninitiated eyes, it looks like some thing I have seen said or written by FOTLer, namely the reference to contract, etc, but I agree this was bad form to infer that you were a supporter of all or any idiosyncrasies of these groups.
What to Consider Before Buying a Franchise
I use a Galaxy Nexus and a Nexus 4. I am a little surprised that a device with the exact same OS version doesn't have this, and I have seen it almost all other android tablets. I guess I made the wrong assumption. Sorry.
I find it great for prototyping. Once things start to get more detailed though I start writing more of my own CSS to fine-tune things.
Drivers opening their doors into the bike lane without looking doesn't help cyclists avoid weaving in and out of it. And before you say anything: In California (and I believe this is true in many other states), opening your door into traffic (and, yes, cyclists count as traffic) automatically puts you at fault in the even of an accident or incident.
There is another similar app called MathPad, a Mac app first released twenty years ago:

http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mwidholm/MathPad/
It's not just this though, there are even more damaging cases of embrace extend extinguish going on right now like With PepperFlash for example.

There Chrome has broken video recording three times the past year by pushing untested code, it's not possible to permanently disable it and the last change actually requires users to click both the Flash allow box and the WebRTC allow box!

That's without even mentioning the bug that if a user doesn't notice the second allow and refreshes the page, like every user does, the Allow box is never shown again.
Similar to how the emergency red-light-to-green traffic signal preemption devices were summarily banned in a lot of places after people figured out the very simple mechanism they use.

http://www.10news.com/news/driver-cited-for-using-traffic-li...
There have been studies like 'Democracy, the God that failed'. The book argues a emperor (or king) looks way beyond the typical 4 year time-span politicians do. A king plans for generations and can not push his population too far as they would revolt. Compared to endless 'Blue team vs Red Team' games filled with fake promises, the thought isn't all that crazy. The book sees Wold War 1 as a battle between emperor-states (like Central Europe and Germany) and democratic states Great Britain, France and the US).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy:_The_God_That_Failed
if(comment.onTopic)){
comment.post()
} else {
comment.delete()
}
Apple Quits Fighting Amazon Over “App Store”
Maybe you should consider avoiding Zoka entirely:

http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/u...
> Young? Ruby is 18 years old, it's certainly not a young language.

Well, its not young compared to Go, but its young compared to C or Lisp or Smalltalk.
And of course the prime example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust
Putting aside questions about IBM's complicity, it's certain that Jews were indeed identified and recorded in their millions using the Hollerith punched card technology.
Apple Patents In-Car Entertainment System With Tactile Feedback
You got it right in the first paragraph! And then drew the wrong conclusion.

That is exactly why you should be for censorship - without it all those words will lose their meaning, and people will invent new ones.

I don't see any need to invent new swear words, and I am against casual use of those words, because doing so leaves them to exist for the situations that warrants them.

I don't want, nor need, to be "shocked" all the time. Not do I want to be so desensitized that it's impossible to shocked me. I like the happy middle.
The problem isn't the structure. The problem is the size of the company. And one should not live in the delusion that office politics is the result of a structure. Rather its a result of size.

In any case a structure, though not official always exists. Somebody on the top is always going to ask his trusted lieutenant when it comes to doing reviews, 1-1, appraisals, deciding hikes and promotions etc.

Your best bet is to keep yourself to a small company. Nothing you are likely to do to a large company can bring about genuine change.
The company Autoliv has a bunch of such products, they're used by major car manufacturers.

See for instance http://www.autoliv.com/ProductsAndInnovations/ActiveSafetySy... which describes their "vision systems", the features of which include pedestrian-detection.

It's possible that Volvo has its own in-house tech for this, but Autoliv are huge.
The Science and History of Pepper Spray
Some of us continuously have to get better at new things or learn new things in our professional life, which might be making it harder to learn new things outside of work. There are so many things that I would like to invest a year to get better at, outside of work. For some reason, I cannot manage the process of simultaneously self learning new things in completely different domains. Either one or both of the self-learning threads get sloppy for me. Perhaps, because self-learning is also an exploratory process so it needs time investment in large chunks, or because our learning resources are limited.