I see such claims made, but I don't often see them backed up by a corresponding argument.

For a portion of society (restricting scope to the U.S.), things have gotten better. For another, very significant portion of society, they have not.

For society overall...? Well, the freedom I had as a child to play outside unsupervised is largely gone. Education is increasingly again a crapshoot of which school you get to / are forced to attend and in that vein and from an economical perspective, who your parents are.

Police are increasingly viewed as "the opposition" and "their own team".

A lot of people wonder how the hell they're ever going to retire.

A lot of sick people are simply staying sick.

So, "efficiency" is "improving" society? For whom? And if that benefit is not being spread around to some degree, are you simply going to build walls to keep the misery out of your community? Or are you actually going to consent to live within its midst?

I favor helping the people around me and throughout this country (living in the U.S., that is of particular although not exclusive interest to me) because I want to be able to enjoy the community and the country I live in. To enjoy walking down the street, and to not have to worry overly whether or not I should or can safely talk to this person or that.

"Efficiency" on its own is not enough. "Trickle down", also in this regard, does not appear to be an assured method of distributing the positive results.

I'll add that people have a finite work lifespan and finite opportunity to accrue assets including and particularly through investment returns.

"Temporary" displacements can disrupt individual lives to an extent where they never recover. And this is happening to many people, families, and communities, these days.

Also, building into new roles often requires considerable assets including but not only available time.

I think some -- many -- of the people making simplistic arguments that "the workforce will adjust" -- and thereupon simply washing their hands of the matter -- have never had to dig themselves out of a significantly deep and challenging hole.

Even personal illness and injury may not compare, when one has considerable resources and support at their disposal. Poverty is not an individual, often limited term challenge to overcome. It is a relentless, draining trap that can create a desert of resources.

Some people do overcome it. But I don't think that's an excuse to just toss them into it, assuming that they'll somehow come out all right on the other end.

--

P.S. I'll add that I did not vote the parent down. Rather, I think this is a conversation we need to and are going to have to have. The alternative as I see it is violence and oppression -- things I would rather avoid.

Also, I do not begrudge the "rest of the world" a rising standard of living. But I do oppose the hollowing out of our own society that current policies and practices have promoted. (And, per some arguments, perhaps also limitations on those other societies. Distortions including political and socio-economic. Brain drain. Etc.)

As members of a society, I think we have responsibility for that society as a whole. And we've been shirking our duty.

In my case, I also find that is to my -- and, I think, our mutual -- detriment.