skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The Miranda warning is just that, a warning. Some people mistakenly call it the Miranda rights, which is wrong. Your rights are in the Constitution, and the Miranda warning just reminds you of those rights.

Now, the question is this: do the authorities make a big deal of not reading him his Miranda warning simply because they expect that if they do he will excercise his rights? Or are they implying, without saying it explicitly that he has no constitutional rights? If it is the latter, then this is worse than declaring him an enemy combatant (for which I see no basis), since now it basically means that anyone the Feds want to nail badly enough can fall under this category.

Imagine a hacker who responsibly disclosed a security issue with some military property being declared as having no fifth amendment rights. Does that sound like a precident we want?

I am not in any way trying to condone Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's actions. At the very least, he fired shots at the police on his own accord and I am fairly certain we will find out a whole lot more terrible stuff as the investigation continues. However, I am not a fan of how the interrogation is being presented.
"A gradual decline in public interest in public television and radio"

Don't forget the conservatives in management who want to "diversity" the programming and defunding due to the "socialist" content.
I don't think there's any graphical usability whatsoever, as the only output is a serial line. He only mentioned X and GNOME to emphasize the fact that it can be started.
Why should Oracle really care if a bunch of enterprise customers have old JREs installed on their desktops? That would be a problem for those enterprise customers for sure, but how would that actually be bad for Oracle?
Role models exist for a reason, and that is that we can do our best to be like them. It's not like we're arbitrarily judging character just for the hell of it. I know that I would like a role model that could show how to be a good person and do well in life. The trouble is, exactly as it says in the article, people look up to Steve Jobs and act like dicks because he did the same as was successful. And that doesn't work. And those people will probably never see their dreams through because they have Mr. Jobs, or Thomas Edison, or whoever else as a role model. So it is very important.
Not just news, it is often better to be unplugged most of the time if you like to get your creative juices flowing. The constant distractions are actually the real roadblocks to critical thinking and creativity these days.
Ah, I did not realize that the Blade is not yet available in the UK. Thanks for the correction.

If this was planned by Razer as a marketing trick then it is quite elaborate, although completely possible. There seems to be several hundred people on the comments who mentioned they made purchases and some would even cancel their order.

In order for this to be staged they would have to limit the number of times that the code could be used (allowable "loss" budget? max number of uses?) and then pretend to realize the mistake and take the site down at the right time (maybe when the "loss" reached a certain amount.) I guess it isn't completely inconceivable... but if that's the case, well-played Razer.
There's an apt civil liberties saying, "a conservative is a liberal that's been mugged, and a liberal is a conservative that has been falsely accused." I think the likelihood that they are being falsely accused in this case is very, very low, but your point is valid. I should have wrote that they were suspected bombers.
" automated tool to add a license file (by easily choosing from a list of existing licenses, of course)"

I see the merits of that (it would be nice to see that option in the "Add Repository" page), but I worry that licenses would then be set by autopilot (without actually considering whether the license is applicable), creating even more problems.
Pop applications of it aren't neurobiology, sure.
Technically... URL is an identifier (locator), not the content. Even more, URL alone does not always denote the content as IP and HTTP headers may affect the result. So, technically a requester can't be sure that re-requesting the resource under a given locator will produce the same content.

But if lawmakers get it, they must also know that URL can't infringe by themselves.
A perfect analogy.
Tautologies are so much fun.

And no one should take an "every" literally in an online comment.

Essentially it means: "almost all my friends have frayed or split cables" and "the guy at the repair shop said it was a known and frequent issue".

It's kinda like saying "every lg retina screen has retention issues".
I realized late last week that I wasn't following this story as a news story anymore. I literally felt like I was watching 24, with cliff-hangers and all. It had stopped being something I followed to remain a well-informed person and just devolved into popcorn-munching entertainment.

It's a clear reminder that limiting news consumption is healthy.
Some screenshots from some random clicking around by somebody:

Adding a feed: http://cl.ly/image/16183s0h0t2e (clever, it auto-fills the name after a second) (not so clever, the only drop-down option is 'all', and it's not pre-selected)

Having added two feeds, I see this: http://cl.ly/image/321t1J2p461p it persists for a while, the spinner in the corner goes away, it persists... toggled 'all', 'unread', etc, no results.

Then it pulls in 5 PHD-comics: http://cl.ly/image/1Y0k01310Q04 No XKCD yet, not sure what happened to it.

And one comic, with read above, unread below: http://cl.ly/image/3N2d3i2Z0g2b

Some basic key commands I've used in Google Reader still work. The UI takes a moment to load data from the server when you change where you are, but once it finishes it's fast. Minor bugs, some holes things seem to fall through, but as a basic RSS reader it works. Maybe there's more to come?

As long as nobody messes it up for everyone else, "somebody password" is what I used if you want to try it out.
Well, that is what "science" is. The measure and best possible understanding of the reality in which all beings live in.
As someone who has a big 4 accounting background and left it for Ruby on Rails, I'd love to find out more about bridgers. dccoolgai, I'd love to find out more. My contact info is in my profile. Thanks
Is that a typo on the README, _twiter_, or is that the name of the gem? I never want to open issues or submit pull requests for things like that in case the author is a dick about it.
With PHP...Xdebug which is incorporated in Netbeans IDE
Don't feel too bad. I had no idea either until I did a search for "razer blade" after reading his comment.
:-) .. thanks!

We use the pdf2html program to generate screenshots on a headless webkit browser - post the DOM from frontend to our servers and do the magic.

Edit: Oops! Just saw that your comment "how did you do the cool screenshot feature" got deleted.
Sphinx (http://sphinx-doc.org/), my tool of choice for writing documentation, includes an extension that does this: http://sphinx-doc.org/ext/doctest.html.
That's what I meant yes. Although I guess if you are really careful it would probably last longer. However the heat from the adapter (and the magsafe plug) will slowly degrade the rubber and glue.
Oh man.

I have been using VS 2012 professional without realizing it didn't have intellitrace. And I have a license for ultimate too (company paid).

Still, I know about intellitrace, I really like the way the takipi java/scala tools display the info though :)
I don't know the joke, could you explain? Googling it didn't give me any hints (the top result is an article at The Onion "Area Man Constantly Mentioning He Doesn't Own A Television")
Flat Design: Great Examples of Websites Following the Trend
Although the “flat design” concept is not new, being successfully used many years ago within design projects, it looks like this year it made a comeback.
>>You have to defend even terrorists' rights if you want yours to stand.

Completely agree with this. Unfortunately most people are too stupid to realize that in order to protect your constitutionals rights you must also protect the rights of people you do not like, i.e. hate spouting religious extremists, of any religion. Even the rights of killers like the Boston bombers must be protected if we want ours to be protected.
How do you aim to provide correct answers to incorrect or incomplete questions?
For those interested in seeing the BlackHat video presentation by Steve
Lord (hn:iuguy):

https://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-eu-12/bh-eu-12-archives.htm...

At the time the idea of "required sharing" was put forward by RMS (1985
or so), it was a serious improvement over the status quo of proprietary
software protected by confusing licensing terms.

Trying to redefine the terms "free," "freedom," and "liberty" to mean
"restricted," "required," and "threat of legal harm" is dishonest
rhetoric. The GNU/FSF should be more honest and direct by clearly
describing their license as "sharing required."

The existence of a commonly used "sharing required" licenses like the
GPL, and LGPL, and LLGPL, and ... has been beneficial in a lot of
different ways. The primary way it has been beneficial over the years
has been in how it very successfully nudges reluctant industry players
towards releasing source code. The _requirement_ of sharing has shown
industry the advantages of sharing code when they were previously
fixated on the competitive advantages of not releasing code.

In the early days, the older BSD/MIT/ISC/PublicDomain licenses (well,
public domain is not formally a license but you get the point), were
insufficient to convince industry players to give up the competitive
advantages of proprietary licenses and closed source software for the
competitive advantages of collaboration through open source.

Times have changed, but not much. Licenses on open source code are
still violated constantly by closed source vendors. It's not just a GPL
problem; there's tons of proprietary closed source programs out there
that fail to live up to either the "attribution" clause or the old
"advertising" clause of the BSD-ish licenses. It really doesn't matter
if your license of choice has an inherited "sharing required" clause,
since it will still get lifted and incorporated into closed source,
proprietary programs. Unless you have tons of time and money to waste in
chasing the violators, your preferred license terms really don't matter.

The most interesting thing about violations of open source licenses is
the reverse engineering perspective. When you're able to identify the
misused open source code within an executable binary, you can then use
fingerprinting of the open source to better understand the closed source
binaries. If you're curious about this kind of identification and
program understanding in reverse engineering, you should look into the
FLIRT and FLARE features of the IDA Pro disassembler.
How to convert and render STL files to images
This is one of the greatest misconceptions about how interrogations are done. In the Spanish Inquisition and Salem witch trials, the tortured to get confessions. In terrorism interrogations (which do include water boarding and other tactics), the goal is to get information. The information they gather is not treated as factual unless it can be confirmed or corroborated from other sources.

When Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was interrogated, they only asked him questions that they already knew the answers to. They weren't immediately trying to get information. They were trying to get cooperation. Once he started answering truthfully, then they asked him questions for information.
Realtime LaTex in the browser without lag.
Studies suggest that trying to correct myths and errors in this way tends to backfire. I did correct posts I'd already made tying the Brown student to the bombers.
Really, that's pretty amazing. Is it a mag-safe adapter?

Are there really no cracks in the cord around where it enters the adapter or where it connects to the magsafe? No brown or yellow plastic?
And you think that's a good thing?
_twitter_ it's dependence gem, thank you, fixed.
My business worked... until I found out it was illegal
My name is Max, and I'm 26.

I currently work as a teacher’s aid in Special Education and am a counselor for a special needs summer camp. I met the girl of my dreams two Summers at this same camp (http://www.partnersinadventure.org/) and have been with her ever since. However, I’m worried about an inability to provide for our future family.

I’ve had one successful business venture previously. I began selling Heady Topper online, an internet-famous beer made in the Vermont area. First I started doing it on Ebay. Eventually I made a website called headytopper.com with Magento (it’s down now for reasons I will soon reveal).

Sales were going great and I had made an extra thousand dollars or so after a couple months. However, during my Christmas break, I got a call from Jen Kimmich, the wife of the brewer John Kimmich. She advised that I stop doing what I was doing as it was illegal in the state of Vermont and “Heady Topper” was trademarked. It was a huge shock I’m lucky to have not gotten sued. I had had a successful but illegal business.

-I really want to start one that is successful LEGAL! I want your help:
-My strengths:
-I’m very frugal
-I am resourceful in that I take a lot of advantage of all that the internet has to offer in the form of software to increase efficiency
-I live in Vermont, state a lot of people want to go to or be a part of
-I am competent at selling
-I have a car
-I have saved about $5K for startup funds
-I am willing to learn
-Thank you very much, any advice would be greatly appreciated

- Max
This is a disturbing trend. Increasingly sale is being redefined as "rent under licensing conditions." It shouldn't say "terms of sale," then.
Umm this really isn't some big "FCFS" business strategy. They never intended to "give some customers 90% discount for no reason." A glitch happened, some people got lucky, and they honored it. I think you're reading too much into it.

Check the next comment on that post, a guy cancelling his order and redoing it at full price. It really is a strong community of enthusiasts.
> I worked on the MobileMe team

Oh crap, she's already biased. That product was a shit-show from the get-go. It doesn't matter how devoted the employees were, the reliability and apparent technical excellence of the product was lacking and that speaks to "poor programmers". You can be the most devoted employee around, but if you simply can't do your job well, that's nobody's fault. iCloud, by comparison, works pretty great.
It would be nice if Google would let submitters to provide (and honor) a OnDMCANotice event handler, so the counter-notice gets sent inmediately, maybe documented with a reference to IP registration.
Sure it can. It just requires an infinite amount of energy.
Uh...these routers aren't "smart". They're doing the bare minimum to get a packet from an input interface to an output interface.

Basically, ANYTHING you try to do at the speed and scale you'd end up needing to use these routers for would be at least as complicated if not more so.

The level of engineering required to de-encapsulate a packet, deal with the L2(Ethernet),L2.5 (MPLS), L3(IP) headers, perform a lookup in the appropriate table (might be more than one), possibly deal with any encapsulations INSIDE that packet (cough-cough GRE) which starts the whole process over again is IMPRESSIVE. You're not going to do that in software, my friend. And anything you build that even begins to look like a general purpose processor will be unable to perform to the degree to which the custom ASICs already do.

NPU (Network Processor Units) were supposed to make this easy but they never took off so now what few remain are doing things like NAT or Application Firewalls, and doing a relatively poor job for the money compared to a reasonable x86 server with appropriate I/O engineering.

tl;dr: you're woefully ignorant about what it takes to make the Internet run fast.
That may seem reasonable to you but according to Wikipedia, it's not the law:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning#Consequences_of...
From its own reference frame, yes. As long as it's in an inertial reference frame, it will spoil at the same rate.
You sound like someone still addicted to breaking news.

The point of the article is that the reliable information value of breaking news is exactly zero. Until you get the summarized and verified end-of-week report, you're being entertained instead of informed.

Breaking news is lead generation. It's a stream of leads which may turn out to have a fact at the end. The right audience for that are journalists, not regular people. Tracking live news without doublechecking everything you hear is a way of satisfying information addiction, but it is not a way of getting informed.
Actually, a fake street is not copyrightable.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street#Legal_issues

A United States federal court found that copyright traps are not
themselves protectable by copyright. There, the court
stated: "[t]o treat 'false' facts interspersed among actual facts
and represented as actual facts as fiction would mean that no one
could ever reproduce or copy actual facts without risk of
reproducing a false fact and thereby violating a copyright . . .
. If such were the law, information could never be reproduced or
widely disseminated." (Id. at 733)
Not even 1 Million a year? 10 million a year? It is only fair.
So, for the record, I live a few blocks from the bombing suspects' apartment, and I work less than a block from where the MIT officer was shot. Without following timely updates, I would have had no idea of the following:

- That I was asked to help keep the streets clear

- More specifically, that I should not go to work

- Though it turned out that there was no need for a controlled detonation, if one had occurred less than a mile from my home, the news reports are the only way I'd know what it was. I could have harassed the officers, but I wasn't going to do that either way.

- Later, that it was OK to leave my home

- Still later, that the manhunt was over and my plans in Watertown this morning could proceed as normal

This is all real, actionable information for me that was reported correctly. I think on the average, I'm better off with that information, even if there was also some garbage mixed in.

Also, what would have happened if the owner of the boat hadn't been following breaking news when the stay-home request was lifted? The bombing suspect would likely have died where he was and not been found until morning. Everyone's better off for that sequence of events.
> Then you're going to have all kind of apps stuck on older Java versions forever.

Actually, that's already the reality of the Java ecosystem. Many libraries are tested to offer compatibility with 1.4, or even 1.3, and several flagship open source projects are not compatible yet with 1.7. With closed source and internally developed systems, the situation is even worse.

If I decide to use lambdas, I'll probably use Jython or Scala. I honestly don't expect to use Java 8 in the next 5 years.
I honestly can't tell which is more tolerable. I might be a cynic, but they both sound like shit.

Dubmood OTOH, is excellent.
Just like this statement that he was replying to: "The last 35 years of technology history is unfathomable without Steve Jobs."
Development on a Chromebook: an opinionated guide
peterjancelis, you're incorrect on all counts:

Posse Comitatus Act:

"The Bill/Act as modified in 1981 refers to the Armed Forces of the United States. It does not apply to the National Guard under state authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within its home state or in an adjacent state if invited by that state's governor. "

* The National Guard of Massachusetts has blackhawks. They are used in times of emergency. This was one such case.

* Governor was there. Invited them. Same state. Law enforcement capacity.

4th Amendment:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Warrants are required for evidence to be used in a court of law. This was not an evidenciary expedition.

* People were not seized from their homes

* People's effects were not seized from their homes

* Searches were in cooperation with home owners (remember, everyone staid home Friday)

* There was probable cause as the suspect was in the area as proven when they found him a few hundred feet from the search area

* There was a clear risk to public safety (7 bombs set off, hundreds of rounds fired, a cop dead, another near death, 15 police hopitalized)

No, I'm not familiar with case law at all. I just took American History in high school and know how to search Wikipedia.
The problem with this argument is that most FPS games are multiplayer games first and single player games second. Multiplayer games are kind of like sports in that the story is created by the players (how you outsmarted your friends last round or how they pulled off a big comeback). Its the single player games that need to care about storytelling since its the responsibility of the game to make interesting things happen.
src/build.bat seems to be missing.
Python 3.4 Release Schedule
There was a recent study which discussed the way that freelancers find work.

They were:
- Referrals (27%)
- word of mouth (24%)
- Personal and professional networks (17%)
Define exited/solid it? Selling to a medium-sized or big company or selling it on a marketplace like Flippa? Depending on the value of your site and company, selling it might be more troublesome or costly in time and money than it's worth to the potential buyer.
Yeah, it's completely fine: [0]

Up until about 6 months ago it was my main computer, used constantly and taken everywhere. It's the original PS too. Maybe the way I wind up the cords has something to do with it? Most people I see don't do it this way: [1]

[0] -- http://i.imgur.com/IxlZPWH.jpg
[1] -- http://i.imgur.com/TEzfDx4.jpg
Everything dies eventually, whether you work on it or not. That statement would carry no information.

In contrast, it is possible to build businesses that scale and work for a long time without much intervention on the part of the founder.
I think Doctorow should busy himself filing takedown notices everywhere Fox's "Homeland" appears legitimately.
Ok, the London IRA example wasn't identical - but the Madrid example was. (Presumably) islamic terrorism, perpetrators still at large, etc. No shutdown.
Yes, there is also something similar in game theory. You're losing if your adversary reduces your branching factor.
I dunno, the bakeries here in Haifa that bake their own bread, cakes, burekas, and other things seem pretty successful, actually. The product is certainly good enough that I prefer it over the supermarket bakery, and the prices are competitive.
I think I've tl;dr'd this correctly: "I won't work on FPSes because they're [excessively?] violent and I'm ashamed of contributing to it".

Which is a great reason, I wish them luck! I'd say it's slightly mis-aimed - it's not just FPSes - but it's a start. I'd love to have a whole variety of blockbusters that aren't the standard fare we have now, and more people working on other things makes it more likely to happen.
So even when he doesn't do anything he still gets credit for the end result?
It's perfectly well described through behaviorism. It's called variable schedule of reward, and we've known it's addictive for over half a century.
> City wasn't shut down

Fair enough, I wasn't there - and I'm sure that had I been there I'd have been sitting quietly in my residence. But right or wrong, the message I picked up from Twitter / CNN / BBC / Spanish news was of a city shut down.