skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
But really, the best line from Good Will Hunting is the "how about them apples" line.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmRe_fK7pbw
Here's a clojure book author on that:

http://s-expressions.com/2012/08/05/rathores-10th-rule-of-pr...
Anyone have any relevant experience with Umbraco?
Improve Open Source Project Adoption by Catering to Integrators
See "Graph Analysis" section on the linked page, they make it pretty clear that there is info that is sent unencrypted but those parts aren't useful for reverse engineering. The data and source code itself sounds like it is encrypted though.
We are in the same boat, but I know they got a chance to look at our application because there are a couple views of our video. I am very excited/nervous/anxious. Does anyone know how long of a wait may be expected? And I was also wondering if the fact that they got a chance to review our application means the will let us know if we are rejected or accepted? Any further information on this wait period would be greatly appreciated.
(3,0) ... (6,2) ... (9,4)

So comprehensive testing is what you are missing :-)
Have there been any updates since that post, or is this just a dupe?
But what does "sffcei" mean? <:)
Indeed. Surveys can help you frame what you're looking for, but you need to talk to real people and get a bit more of an understanding of why they feel the way they do.
There was no mobile "kill switch" in Boston
Wow...thanks for all the comments. I've been a causal reader of Hacker News, but this was my first post. I'm really impressed all the comments. Lots of great questions/comments.

There was one thing I neglected to mention in the blog post, that I should mention now. We ran a contest (prior to the survey) that required contestants to submit their body measurements. We wanted shoppers to see the power of submitting their measurements. We threw quite a bit of money and traffic and the contest and we saw almost no engagment. My thinking was, if we can't get shoppers to submit their measurements for a chance to win a free high end fashion design, we might have a problem (let's do a survey!)

As @lmm suggested the demographic for high fashion is mostly women. Also, we struggled to find high end men's fashion designers interested in our offering.

@ericabiz - We played around with the language on our site, however, admittedly, I'm not a marketer, so there was definitely room for improvement here. Which is why I've signed up for CoFoundersLab (http://www.cofounderslab.com) so I can find a compatible partner before jumping into my next start up.
You are a reporter: The new journalist is in the mind of the reader
Google hands over email addresses based on court orders and
(less frequently) warrants.

So, the authorities have the resources to request user data by the numbers 14,000 and above from just Google alone for Gmail accounts [1]... and you're telling me we need more cyber security bills to make it even easier for them. Don't you think they already have it easy enough? I'm still skeptical about your claim that presently there exist no means for USG to legally hand over malware samples to the authorities in existing legal frameworks. Can you provide some citation that talks about this?

[1] http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/userdatarequests/ -- it should be noted that Google complies with the requests a majority of times. Also, it is reasonable to assume that it is mostly American gov't agencies who make up for most of the requests.
Low transaction costs translates directly into increased profit margin. Surely every business wants that?
Creating and deploying node.js applications with pagen.js
There's been a new set of things posted.
Don't sell a technology, sell a solution!
Google stopped SOPA. They can help stop CISPA too, grotesque legislation that will destroy online privacy. Maybe if they notice the above search query hitting their servers enough, they'll pay attention to us.

Contact them: http://www.google.com/contact/
telephone: +1 650 253 0000
fax: +1 650 253 0001
I already have a fixed set of tabs open for different use cases, and switch between them frequently. Adding a new tab to that temporarily would probably confuse me. I may try the tabedit / tabclose solution nevertheless though, I hadn't thought about doing it that way. The advantage being that I'd have one plugin less :)
SHA is OK, if you have a long random key. I forget the numbers, but a decent random key (100 chars?) becomes impossible to crack before the heat death of the universe. The exponential growth of the password space eventually defeats the weakness of SHA.

The reason you need bcrypt is that user supplied passwords are crap, and can be cracked very quickly.
That was indeed a long time ago :-)

After that it was possible for a long time to have your character training a skill while you subscription had run out. That was a good way to make a specialized alt with Battleship 5, etc. for half or 1/3 the cost of a full-time account.

However, they fixed that as well a couple of years ago. They did add a skill queue though!
So many good lines....and I agree, that is the best
Something isn't amended by divine providence; it's amended by enough people opposing it relative to the number that support it. Saying you have to support it until it's amended is crazy talk. Saying you have to abide by it is something else entirely.
You're reinforcing my point. If you go to college, spend money on tuition, and don't use your degree, you've wasted all that money--that you likely went into massive debt to acquire--for something you could have done without spending all of that money on tuition.

I'm not saying "don't spend time not working to train for what you want to do". Don't conflate education with learning. I'm saying "don't spend money on colleges". My old university, a public school, advertises "$8 to $10k a semester for in-state students living on campus full-time". Having been through their system I know whatever they advertise is a crock of shit, but let's give them the benefit of the doubt here for a minute. Holy shit, $20k a year for just crappy place to live and shitty food to eat--if that is how you are treating it because you won't end up using your degree--is insanely expensive.

So after 3 years of this, you've spent upwards of $60k on no degree. I don't think the degree itself would have been worth $80k to finish it (actually, more like $100k, because most of the people I now didn't finish their computer science degrees there in 4 years, me included). I'd have much rather ended those 5 years with project experience--and business experience!--under my belt and a little money because I'd been selling my own projects.

We talk about runways with startups and how working lean extends your runway because the money is a fixed entity. Going to college is just not working lean. You're spending upwards of $55/day, just to live and practice your craft. There are LOTS of ways to live on a lot less than $55/day.
Well, I'm glad to be wrong in this case. ;)
Again, the fact that enough people cared enough about his project to get it to the front page is enough for me to say "This is relevant to HN". He's an entrepreneur, it is a project well within the demographic for this site's purview, and he didn't do anything except submit it for people to look at and approve/disapprove of.

More power to you if you can get people to up-vote your ad for a 1992 Toyota Corolla without people flagging it into submission.
+1 For evil-mode. I'm still using MacVim and Emacs+Evil side by side because many things that my vim does (via plugins etc) my emacs/evil doesn't do yet and I lack the time to research it all. But having elisp for extension is such a joy to use. I've dabbled a bit with evil, too, and I really like how easy it is to extend it.
The Internet absolutely does need more regulation. I disagree in principle that regulation is bad, but I also think that simply saying "quit regulating" is myopic. Regulations exist, and refusing to touch them because we're afraid of "more regulation" just leaves them dysfunctional.

For example, right now due to the lack of clear regulations concerning digital storage, a lot of law enforcement agencies believe that they can legally access people's personal email without a warrant. This should be corrected with a clear law that says you need a warrant, since the 4th amendment's talk of being secure in "papers" is too vague.

There's good regulation and bad regulation. "Less regulation" is a good sound byte, not a good strategy.
It could be that the ranking prior to the swap is continuing to have some lasting effect on the sites after the swap. It would be worth doing the same test on new domains (with new content), to be sure there weren't any side effects from the swap itself.
My first thought was to the age of the domains ... all are the same though, I wonder what order they were crawled in?

I'm sure there are plenty of sites that contain hyphens, that should be favoured (and probably are with all the other signals) over their hyphenless cousins, still seems unfair if there is a penalty though!
It's not just two proxies chained together - there is always at least one middle node between entry and exit.
Because the tempo of incidents in a real security response practice is very high, orders of magnitude more than the temp of criminal investigations.

This is one of those places where I'd suggest you want to be careful what you wish for. Here's why:

If we can generally agree that there is a kind of operational network security data that should reasonably be shareable --- say, Netflow records corresponding to a DDoS in progress --- and that data is routinely generated, then requiring a court order to share it routinizes the court order process.

When you make a routine out of what was intended to be an exception, it stops being an exception. A court order is a demand from the state that someone do things. We probably want court orders to be on the "right" side of the base rate fallacy.
I'm sure they were both quite familiar with Pascal
These are just the latest breed of these types of people for eve.

My eve history is beta, and on and off for years. I have 2 chars, my baby she was born on release day just shy of 90milion now(yes yes i un-subbed for years at a time) and a secondary of 40 million who is the transport/mining hauling alt.

Now I was lucky, like really lucky. I found a group in beta, there was 10 of us, by release we were 8 but within 6 weeks we had our own BPOs and running a high sec manufacturing chain. We did alright but it was dull so we moved to Fountain, and were part of the group that originally found FA. Funny the original corp ended up being a front for BoB for years ran by the bob manufacturing team.

Anyway FA at the start, m0o invaded, FA defended as best we could, my corp got invited to merge with Evol (who never recruited) and so started what I like to think of as the first step towards bob.

The organizational involved to get BoB up and running and running for 3-4 years was massive. Never under estimate what molly and co were able to pull off. They were the first big alliance for me personally. Not that i am taking away from the people in this news bit, but i do think they are just redoing what we did originally in the day. The difference is they saw how we did it and done it better, we had to do it from scratch, and by doing so we made some amazing bonds and were the force for years. Also remember BoB did the BoB BBQ which is where they would rent a camp site somewhere in EU and everyone from BoB was invited, really bob was all about building a close team and i was sad when it got removed from the game like it did but meh a game is a game.

Anyway I is off, Eve is awesome but only play if you have time to play, it will eat years off you
Yes, actually, I know exactly why Facebook's moved away from it: the beginnings of their HTML5 mobile strategy actually pre-dated the original iPhone, and as such they were using a strategy that didn't really make sense in the post iPhone world. Namely, the app was pulling down the mobile version of their website from the server on every request, which as you might imagine meant things were generally pretty sluggish. So it was really no different than just hitting the mobile version of Facebook with mobile Safari. Contrast this to using a javascript app that runs off the phone's file system and just makes requests to the server for JSON data, caching that data in localStorage along the way (which is what we do). That strategy is really no different than what fully-native apps do except that you're presenting and managing the data in a webView rather than a UITableView. It's much more performant with the benefit of using HTML/CSS for (cross-platform) layouts.

LinkedIn's move away from HTML5 I can't explain as well, although they do mention issues with memory management and a lack of good development tools out there. We haven't run into any issues like that but every use case is different. I do know that LinkedIn, instead of using Phonegap, wrote their own native bridge using websockets and a mini web server that would run natively that they themselves admitted wasn't the best approach. I think there's a lot of pressure, especially in large companies, to move to fully native apps these days because of all the negative press about HTML5, so instead of doubling down engineering efforts to solve problems that arise teams are much more likely to take the nuclear option and just rewrite everything in native code (twice!).

So no, it's not that they have a "grudge against HTML or something", it's that they ran into limitations due to specific circumstances unique to their products and strategies and took the safe path of going fully native to guarantee optimal performance at the cost of productivity (IMHO). If there was no native app option, they would figure out clever solutions to their problems from which the entire web community would benefit.
Your tone in all of your comments on this post is inappropriate for HN. You have a new account so if you are indeed new here, I suggest you read other comments on the site to get a feel for the community.
Perhaps a more strict definition of Cyber Threat Intelligence would help. If the definition was narrowed to exclude private data, that would go a long way. But doesn't the US-CERT already do this? What information would the US-CERT like to share that they cannot currently share?
HTML5 is not going to replace native for things over time simply because it's not the default way to do things on mobile platforms. The best chance of HTML/JS everywhere was webOS, now FirefoxOS. Everything else thus far has been a hack, even if a very pragmatic one.

HTML5 for iOS/Android is like Flash or Java applets are/were for the web.

I'm not sure why web geeks hate Flash or Java applets so much and are trying to do the same thing for mobile apps.
Is it seriously this hard to sell wordpress/drupal solutions? I work at a small company (Maltese based) - we do this every day. We never really bring up the technology itself - it's all about the customization and the effort required to develop a custom theme and integrate any plugins (some may be custom) required.

Perhaps we've been lucky with our clients but nobody has said that Wordpress is free, ergo I should be charged way less. We do not charge anything for the CMS itself - we charge for the implementation.

Also agree that talking to clients and puzzling out what he really needs is extremely important. Often, what a client says can be way different than what he means - and that can bite you hard. I've learnt to constantly ask for clarification if the client is being vague.

About SEO - Damn if I hate all the SEO "gurus" cropping up trying to peddle snake oil or some dodgy techniques that should, in theory, shoot them up the rankings, but in reality, does absolutely nothing.
The article title made a very interesting point. It would be surprising and interesting if the most biggest or most profitable industries all had such huge externalities that they would be unprofitable if those were taken into account.

But the headline does not match what the TEXT of the article says. The text of the article says:

> Trucost’s third big finding is the coup de grace. Of the top 20 region-sectors ranked by environmental impacts, none would be profitable if environmental costs were fully integrated. Ponder that for a moment. None of the world’s top industrial sectors would be profitable if they were paying their full freight. None!

In other words, the industries THAT HAVE THE MOST EXTERNALITIES have externalities greater than their profits. No longer surprising at all. And the entire frenzy the article is trying to whip us up into is based on this one misstatement of their actual results.
Bitfloor, number four Bitcoin-based exchange, shuts down for good
Just as users will try a web-app before investing in downloading the native app, companies will develop web apps before investing in native apps. Once a company has the resources to go fully native, in exchange for 5-10% more user engagement it makes sense.
1.1 Million Requests/Second seems especially low for Amazon.

The average server can serve more than 1,000 static objects / second easily.
One of the Best Cold Emails I’ve EVER Received
Dollar cost averaging is for punks
British ISPs view on the web attacks
Is there an explanation on how to access these posts? Thank you!
Bitcoin is a protocol. There is nothing stopping the UN from creating their own currency using the Bitcoin protocol with all the characteristics they require of a reserve currency.
But it is extremely specific to asm.js -- the optimizations possible can only happen because static typing is mandated. It is absolutely a subset of JS, but JS can't make those optimizations because the guarantees aren't there.
Lets say the whole file is 1000 bytes and each of the five chunks is 200 bytes. If 2 and 4 have failed, then the HEAD would return with a Range header like this:

Range: bytes=0-199,400-599,800-999

The client would then know it had to resend bytes 200-399 and 600-799 (namely parts 2 and 4). If the chunks only partially failed (say 100 bytes of each chunk was received), the HEAD might even return something like this:

Range: bytes=0-299,400-699,800-999

So now the client knows it only has to resend bytes 300-399 and 700-799 (only the last 100 bytes of chunks 2 and 4).

Technically the Range header isn't valid in an HTTP response (something they are aware of), but conceptually I think the idea works fairly well.
You are right, such terms are ambiguous. But I would be happy even if employees playing the _same role_ achieving the same results get paid the same. But that is often not the case.
Hm. Are you familiar with Danny Choo[1]? I talked to him briefly about some work a while back; very nice, down to earth guy, and he's absolutely huge with Japanophiles. If you can either trade work or get him interested in your service, a little promotion from him would go a very, very long way.

[1]Could be mildly NSFW for those in an office: http://www.dannychoo.com/
Incorrect. The PCI-DSS is an industry standard that everyone who touches credit cards must adhere to, which I suspect is a good portion of the audience here.

https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/documents/pci_dss_v2.pd...

See section 8.5.9 for the password change policy. Section 3.6.4 for the key rollover policy (which references NIST 800-57 that basically says 1-3 years for most keys.

There's other standards (such as the 1-5 years for an SSL certificate from the issuer) and tons of best practices out there. In short you should be rolling over keys and expiring passwords on some sort of schedule. My point was that because humans use passwords they are conventionally seen as needing quicker expiration than keys.
Luckily it seems like this is becoming a less common practice in library development in Scala. As the Scala community matures, people are starting to shy away from abusing Scala's DSL features.
This is from 2011, the frictionless owls case study is well known to those who invest in domain names. Hyphens are a bad idea.
You should use `nnoremap` instead of just `map`:
http://learnvimscriptthehardway.stevelosh.com/chapters/05.ht...

HTH
Oh, this tired, old trope.

Why should even the ideal version of this "Life Experience" cost anything to anyone? Why does it have to take place at a college?

And so you're telling me that now you have a job, your personal development has ceased? that you don't develop yourself, try to meet people, take up hobbies, or discover what you enjoy?

This is the problem! When you're in massive amounts of debt, you're constantly working. You become a slave to a wage and you are less than a whole person.

Why would you ever work a 9 to 5 for someone else unless you had no choice?
This seems like a bit of attention whoring. If the guy wants to come back to the scene, which he very obviously does, then just do it. These occasionally cryptic updates should be reserved for the new releases of half life and portal. Not for a Ruby programmer who had a nervous breakdown and has now decided to return to public life. It is annoyingly cocky to be posting what he does and to assume the community will go through the time to behold his crypted messages and even more saddening that everyone is going for it hook line and sinker.

HN is not for this kind of stuff and it should be flagged. Tech news; not personal drama.

Also worth nothing- Jonathan Gillette never vanished into thin air. _why was just his made up character. Like kermit the frog.
I think people thing US-CERT is more important than it actually is because of its history, which included a long stretch where it was the only incident response team anyone had heard of. But in reality, US-CERT does very, very little: it is a clearinghouse for heavily redacted vulnerability information that has usually been in the mainstream for a long time.

Did you read the definition of cyber threat information in the bill? It's here: http://intelligence.house.gov/hr-624-bill-and-amendments

If so, I'd be interested in your ideas for improving the definition.

Thank you for the thoughtful comment.
>If there are better scope and privacy controls, then what is the issue?

The issue is that there aren't. You can't argue that we should pass this bill because you believe some different bill would be less problematic. Get the Senate to insert an amendment with whatever language you're talking about and show a page on eff.org explaining how the amendment addresses all of their concerns, then you can make that argument.
Apple stock drops to under $400. No longer most valuable company.
I this not just knowing your market?

I had a friend drop $20,000 on a new supplement and training business, built out an app for trainers the way he saw thought it should be, and recruited trainers. Lots. Showed them the app, and got a lot of feedback, but by then it was too late. He was out of money and no dev wanted a piece of the pie.

He should have done his market research first. The OP too, no?
Sharp-eyed student takes on famed economists over basic errors - and wins
They are in PCL. A viewer such as http://openpcl.sourceforge.net/ will work.

On the Mac PCLtoPDF does a really nice job http://www.columbia.edu/~em36/pcltopdf.html
Could you expand on what you mean with "custom native stuff"?
Still, these are all excellent reasons to have one in physical reach. Co-locate? Is it even an efficient use of electricity and money over making a similarly performant VM sharded many times on a more performant system?
Trello betas "Business Class", starts accepting money
Many (most?) countries have nothing like the U.S. second amendment and in most countries (at the very least, members of the OECD), gun violence is NOTHING compared with that of the U.S.

Many (most) citizens of these countries are opposed to any type of CISPA legislation, for very good reasons.

Arguments based on comparisons of amendments of the U.S. constitution are looked upon as very parochial and ignoring very important issues as seen from other countries.
Wake up to the Twitter effect on markets