skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
yes, we don't hook anything. i've not tried this, but you should be able to hook on to the paste event for that div (the div is really your markup, we don't do any magic shadow iframing)
I've just been using tip post-1.0.3 and pulling down a new version and recompiling (which only takes a couple of minutes) approximately weekly.

ARM support at 1.0.3 was pretty iffy and now it is really quite good. YMMV depending upon platform and how you are using Go, but in my experience tip is incredibly stable most of the time, certainly stable enough for hobby project development.
Is that legal? I've seen all kinds of analogies like "if your neighbor leaves the front door unlocked..." or "but if you go down the street testing each lock..." but never anyone who really knew what actual criminal law says.
Drawing Analog Style Clocks In VB.NET
sure, then you would, but would you then go to the gap and complain about their prices? Also, the difference is that they are using the 70$ tool, which is obviously better than the free or cheaper price points, but complaining that the price is obscene.
My question is more meta: why 4 podcasts in 2 years?

I follow a few podcasts myself which do it week-in-and-week-out, and I'm jealous, but not jealous enough to make the podcast a higher priority than e.g. date night. Keith and I have been pretty busy since the podcast started. I got married, he and his wife had two children, etc. Our schedule is generally sort of at the mercy of "We both need availability" plus "We both need to have something fresh to talk about", and recently I find myself with very little to talk about that is both novel and appropriate for public consumption.

Basically, I want to know where producing a podcast ranks among the various ways to build a professional brand on the interwebs.

I know people who are pretty effective at having done it, but it isn't the primary reason people know who I am. (Blog, Internet commenting at places like HN, conference speeches, in my case.) I mostly do it because I enjoy doing it, and it gives me a built-in excuse to chat with smart people about interesting subjects while also teaching other folks, both of which are interesting to me.
Also, FuelPHP is a Rails inspired PHP Framework.
TL;DR: The calendar is the vessel, not the inbox.
You're touting these as positives for git but in the context of training a large group to use a new VCS they are a negative.
This one goes both ways. Yes, your employer will benefit from what you learn from your side project, but at the same time, if your side project's server crashes at 2pm while you're at work, you're going to be very inclined to fix it right then and there on your employer's dime.
Agree, but the author's point was you shouldn't work on a side project unless it's a "real business".
Probably appears worse than it is

I don't mean to diminish the significance of any particular issue, but this is definitely true for much of what you hear about the US. Our media, both mainstream and alternative, tends to revolve around scandal and outrage, and there's an apocalyptic undertone that we love to hear in everything. Imagining events as fragments of gigantic intractable problems that may soon crush us all infuses our opposition to them with a sense of heroism so American that we feel naked without it.
Also available for Windows these days.
Looking for an apartment/roommates?
If you are looking for an apartment for the summer, or a sublet, or a roommate, try tpot (http://tpot.stanford.edu).
tpot is an app built at Stanford that helps you find tenants/roommates that shared common friends/attributes with you.

Here's how it works:
1a. if you are posting a "roommate wanted" ad on, say craigslist (CL), you log into tpot using Facebook, create a trust link, and paste it in your description on CL.
1b. If you are responding to a CL ad, again log into tpot, create a trust link, and send it with your response.
2. When the other party clicks on it, they (and you) see the following info:
- If you and them are within 3 hops (friend of a friend of a friend) of each other on FB.
- Which of your friends are you connected to them through.
- If you went to the same school, grew up in the same town, and/or worked for the same employer.

This info will help you (and them) make a more informed decision about renting/roommates.

This also works in other settings which require a high degree of trust: ride shares, finding cofounders, contract jobs, etc.
HP Moonshot Servers: Intel Atom Beats ARM (For Now)
When HP Moonshot servers launched today, Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) was quick to note that the new Hewlett-Packard (NYSE:HPQ) servers will leverage Atom processors -- though HP does eventually plan to offer ARM-based support as well. It's a significant near-term win for Intel, which hopes to defeat potential rivals like ARM in the emerging market for so-called "microservers."
Stuff You Can Buy with Bitcoin on Craigslist
Should you pay $250K to go to college?
Of course there are good public schools. The problem is, they're mainly where the kids would get a good education even if public schools didn't exist. Those parents would find a way.

And by forcing those active-and-mobile parents to cluster together geographically, to get their money's worth from the public system, the abandoned isolation of the other students gets worse.
Wealth is good, even for a very few, for the many will benefit from it in the long run.

Wealth acquired from evil means, like corruption, theft, coercion and taxation, is evil no matter your moral stance, and that's the only wealth that should be fought against and given back to its original owners.

Whatever the means and however the distribution methods.
Brilliant!

Suggestion: I would love to see the full list of available pods (not just search) with short description next to them somewhere.
Why I Created my Retirement Account when I was 20 years old.
I'm going to try and be useful to this discussion, and I haven't seen anyone mention this by name yet so, here goes...

The Law Of Diminishing Marginal Utility. It essentially states that the more of something you have, the less additional value each subsequent unit brings to your life relative to the last one you added. (Even billionaires stop with a handful of houses)

The problem is the author implicitly tries to objectify the value of bitcoin, when in fact the value is completely subjective, just as the value of anything truly is.

One cannot take the subjectivity out of value as the author has tried to do here by saying 'More = Good' Value, being subjective, comes in the form of utility. I do not care what you call it, what it's priced in, or if you value it but, if I were to acquire a voucher for unlimited free flights, lifetime duration, transferable from myself to anyone of my choosing, on any airline, I would value that voucher very highly. That being said, while I may keep the next one for family, and several for friends, at some point I'm going to start selling them to others for a metric boatload of money.

Please note none of this implies any kind of 'rational actor' theory or any such thing. I see the law of diminishing marginal utility as just that, a law of nature. Despite what people may say, their actions prove it to be so.

*Also I think the author is implying that people who act like the people he's talking about in his post will take a pretty big haircut at some point in this whole bitcoin experiment. I think that says more about the people than the system at large.
Databases have always been known as relational, RDMS, etc.

In the "old days" I never heard of people referring to Oracle as a "SQL Server", nor DB2, etc.

Even now, people talk of Postgres as a "RDBMS", not, "Postgres, a SQL server".

So I'd say that I don't particularly agree with your postulation.
This is cool - but I think it doesn't scale in the real world. If I've got, say, two thousand albums, well damn, all of a sudden having them all over the place on platters doesn't sound so good. The nice thing about vinyl is, while it takes up space, it is the music itself and has value other than as a pointer. Really neat little project, though.
I think the non-performing entity argument is a red herring. As long as patents exist at all, patent rights will be salable.

Rather, I think the problem is that the vast majority of these patents fail to cross the obviousness bar and should never have been granted at all. I mean, seriously, a patent on sending a fax by email, when lots of things are already being sent by email? Give me a fucking break!

I think the fundamental problem is this. A patent is a deal we, the people of the US, make with an inventor: add significantly to the sum total of our technical knowledge, and in exchange, we'll give you a time-limited monopoly on the technique you invented. The problem is that there isn't anyone unambiguously charged with making sure this is a good deal for us: that the knowledge we're getting is worth the price we're paying. It's technically the PTO's responsibility, and they do make some effort, but the incentives given patent examiners don't encourage them to be hard-nosed about it.
Actually, nothing stops a government from using fiscal stimulus if BitCoin is pervasively used. The US Government will, I'm sure, never accept taxes in anything other than US Dollars (that being the fundamental base of value the US Dollar is based on, and the subsequent avoidance of jail time due to not paying taxes or otherwise satisfying Uncle Sam), and they will remain free to helicopter-drop as many Dollars on the world as they like. If the BitCoin economy subsequently devalues Dollars, well, that's just the expected reaction. It's not as if there aren't commodities already out there doing just that.

(Also, not all of us consider Keynesian stimulus to be some wildly successful proved theory; I for one think you merely need to look out the window to see the failures of the theory to match reality. But fortunately, Keynesian is immune to criticism, because no matter how bad things get, Keynesian saved us from it being even worse, thus, no amount of failure can ever disprove the system. Phew! That said, BitCoin isn't the ideal either.)
If the Green Scare had happened a few years later, the words 'domestic terrorism' would have been thrown around quite a bit more.

The FBI has referred to animal rights activism as domestic terrorism for a while now, it's just that 'terrorism' wasn't a public meme until relatively recently.
That's hardly an excuse given that HN itself runs on 1 core, and just a fraction of that traffic will be going through to this post.
can you get drunk by drinking listerine?
The Art of Rejection
She didn't sell coal mines. Her administration did however sell off as much oil as possible as fast as possible which cratered the market for oil so low it helped bankrupt the USSR at our expense. Now the UK is a net importer of oil ten times as expensive. Just one example of short term policies that allowed tax cuts to make us feel good while screwing the UK in the long term.
This really sucks, I tried to move $1300 to an exchange using them on Saturday. I was wondering what in the world was going on when the deposit didn't go through and they weren't responding to email, phone, live chat or IRC. Apparently this is the reason.

Unfortunately right now I was only able to find this by digging around, the company itself is completely unresponsive. This is not a good show by their executive team going radio silent like this, I haven't even received any recognition that my support request was received.

The BTC economy has a few weak links, the exchanges seem to be the absolute weakest. I would pay a premium for rock solid service.
The 'suicidal' example was git -h branch:

$ git -h branch
[blargh]
Hey guys & gals, I created cocoadocs to try and fill a gap in the iOS ecosystem.
It's a site that acts similar to rubydocs in that it gets the latest cocoapods libraries and documents them using a custom flavour of appledoc. I'm planning on adding support for Xcode and Dash over the next few weeks to make it even easier to use!
CRM & Analytics: Together at Last
Reading inspiring stories like this makes me realize how much of entrepreneurship is about taking risks rather than hard work. Moving to another place with a few thousand dollars in your pocket, quitting a stable job without a firm idea in mind, figuring things out as you go.

There may have been dozens of well prepared and hard working candidates available that day, but probably none were out of job and interviewing for Justin.tv at the time Arram was. There are also always tons of people working at perfectly great jobs, but a very few of us have the gut to stop working and forge a company built on nothing but determination to succeed.
Absolutely; thanks for the correction. It seems I was just a tad too excited to post, haha.
The article is full of technical misconceptions, but if I had to guess:

1) Botnets give you a ton of bandwidth to run port scans or crawling searches.

2) They also allow you to "map" port scans or searches over thousands of computers (e.g. one computer in the botnet scans one specific port times ten thousand ports), obscuring the fact that a scan is even occurring.
I think it's because you can use botnets to divide up the vast IPv4 search space among the individual bots and crawl it exponentially faster.
A friend of mine invited Bret to do this talk. He told me that Bret sent close to 50 emails leading up to the event making sure that every aspect of the talk was perfectly choreographed.
Wages in bitcoin.

But I really want to talk about it in terms of units of productivity. If the value of bitcoin goes up over time, then each unit of productivity will be worth less bitcoin over time. Meaning that relative to units of productivity, a debt will increase.

In your first example, you relied on the assumption that your boss or customers or whatever would not take the current BTC value of your productivity into account. In your new example, you are relying on the people you hire not taking the value of their labor in BTC into account. Neither of those are reasonable assumptions.
I use a filter to send most of my email into a "Batch" folder which I check maybe once a day, if that. The rest of the email I do check first thing in the morning, and like jstanley I get to inbox zero (on the non-batch stuff) every morning before I start working.
The end result went far beyond removing that power. It devastated their towns and destroyed families.
Just to play devil's advocate:

5. SQL Server supports indexes on computable columns [1]

6. CLR Integration allows you to write a lot of things in C# (or VB.NET) [2]

10. Unicode is there by default if you use nchar/nvarchar/ntext columns, there's no problems unless you choose to use char/varchar/text instead

[1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189292(v=sql.90).a...

[2] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms254498(v=vs.80).as...
If this was Apple, they wouldn't care because most of the users have already updated to the latest OS.
Why would anyone sell when they see the price keep rising? Unless they fear it will go down - and then everyone wants to sell and the bubble pops...
> Can you find one single thing over Shodan you can't with a specific Google search?

The entire rest of the Internet? Google is great at crawling HTTP and HTTPS, but the Internet is more than the web.
Should you even be an investor?
Thanks, this is really easy to do as right now cocoadocs generates a jsonp file of every cocoapod: http://cocoadocs.org/documents.jsonp - so whilst ATM I'm not planning on doing this, someone can do it very easily.
It seems like the harder part would be hitting New York. You could crash the ISS somewhere on Earth pretty trivially, if you had the controls.
The example here is somebody who apparently needs to take one to access some confidential information - and clearly they take a pass/fail seriously, so it seems some (presumably US?) government agencies do take it seriously enough to make passing one a security requirement.
> it's the poor that need help

http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_reveals_new_insights_o...

This is happening. Slowly. Like all change.
>"It seems there's a hesitation of spending bitcoins knowing if you just wait a day it will go up"

So this argument seems to be rather popular, and on the surface it does seems to make sense. However, it glosses over an important consideration.

Are you buying goods in USD or BTC?

Now if it's the latter, then yes there may be stronger psychological pressure (even though rationally there is not much difference).

However, increasingly goods are being traded in USD using BTC as a backing, in which case it would make little difference if you spend in USD from a bank account, or USD with a bitcoin wallet. Because it is possible to trade USD for BTC almost instantly. (Let's ignore the issue of wire transfer delays for now, because that doesn't change the overall argument).

Consider the person holding say 200 bitcoins today. In this situation, if the transaction is a small amount (say a cup of coffee ($3), at 180USD/BTC is about 0.016 BTC at todays rate. I'd have no problem spending that.

In fact psychologically it may be more likely that people trade with their BTC "winnings", because like a casino it has been shown that that is treated as more disposable than "real money".

Thus if one is spending a fraction of a bitcoin priced in USD, and this amounts to a small percentage of your overall position, it's unlikely to endure as a significant purchasing disincentive.
That's not really Win16 support. It's like saying it supports DOS because it can run DOSBox.
If you have the needed skills, it's definitely worth going for. I've been bootstrapping a small startup over the last year and it's been an amazing experience.

I think the abundance of cheaply available technology also expands the scope of what could be considered as a 'micro' startup, given your definition of being one-man-manageable and not requiring outside investments. Consider the technology available today: Infrastructure as a service, database as a service, search as a service, platform as a service, web-encoding as a service, (you get the idea).

Leverage expert service providers, focus on cash flow from day 1 and take control your destiny :)
Not sure what your point is. Any leader who has a country in combat will loose soldiers.

From the page you linked to:

> After consultation at Cabinet level, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher agreed that Commander Chris Wreford-Brown should attack the Belgrano.[7]

So she listened to her top military advisers and agreed to their plan. Not sure there's anything wrong with that.
I think you're a tad off the mark as far as Microsoft BI goes. I've seen some very large firms use it as their entire BI stack. And I've had a lot of work in it.

Then again, you really only want to do this if you already have SharePoint, since that's the web presence (it's a module in SharePoint called PerformancePoint). But SharePoint has sold a metric shitton of licenses (I don't know why). You're right to be hesitant to bring SharePoint in, but for those who have, it works all right. Even for "real BI" (whatever that means).

The backend stuff works well, and there are a lot of tools that can pick it up--my personal favorite being Tableau. Also, PowerView in Excel 2013 is pretty nifty, and it's what I've been waiting on since Microsoft acquired ProClarity in 2006.
Usually the MAC is stored in the network card's flash while the system image is stored in a different flash altogether, which is often cheaper if you can find a way to get away with making them all exactly the same.
Unlike other currencies, Bitcoin is limited in supply and produces a set amount every 10 minutes - as a result there is the potential for a liquidity trap because these new injections into the market may fail to stimulate economic growth. Whereas, fiat currencies are backed by Governments etc (something which Bitcoin isn't) and these currencies can theoretically have an unlimited amount supplied into the economy - and as I highlighted with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009[1] government spending and lending can have a positive impact on the economy in particular through kick-starting the multiplier effect.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Recovery_and_Reinvestm...
Agree. Fully understand the ability to self learn (and have done that with almost everything I've ever made a dollar on despite going to one of those good business schools which is why people think I make money rather than other qualities).

My comment strictly related to the style of what they were saying (and how I might rewrite that) I think it's a great idea.
If more people are using Bitcoin, then there would be more transactions. Bitcoin transactions / day have grown from ~35,000 in August 2012 to ~55,000 in February 2012.

Between February 2012 and today, the number of Bitcoin transactions/day has not grown at all, while Bitcoin prices have skyrocketed by 1000%.
Should the first female nominee for U.S. Vice Present from the republican party, who rose to the top of an extremely male dominated field, serve as an inspiration for gender equality?

edit: mpyne said it best somewhere else in this thread:

"He's saying that it's the position of power that
is morally bankrupt, not the man that happens to
be filling it today.

If tomorrow a woman was in the same position of
power then it would still be morally bankrupt,
because it is the position which leads to moral
bankruptcy, not the person filling the position."

Perhaps most politicians aren't good role-models because a career in politics doesn't attract the kind of people who are good role-models.
Just wait until you find out how all this works with our Grand Jury system to send people to jail without trial or 5th amendment rights.
That law says nothing about photography.
I’m a Fraud
how about just stop doing it?
I guess we'll be forced to stick with the status quo, then. Politics requires compromise. Not everyone's moral yardstick is the same as yours. I don't think you would find a great many people who would think that the slave analogy is appropriate, so the only option I have left is to exclude you from the conversation. You're in a very small minority when you equate the rights of animals to the rights of a human.
I agree that it's not a 'currency killer' in the short run BUT if we speculate that BTC reaches mainstream popularity and a total market value in the 100-1000s of BILLION USD the fact that an 'unknown' amount is in circulation makes for a very strange variable.

All of a sudden my old 1BTC wallet on my crashed laptop hard drive may be worth 100s of days of mining network wide, and even the speculation that a 'previously unknown' wallet containing 100BTC (there are a LOT of those sitting on old phones and hard drives already I promise) would have possibly disastrous effect on currency value etc.

All I am saying is that there are a LOT of factors to consider and BTC loss over time is a major one.

My argument being: A finite supply of a currency is one of the factors people REALLY need to think about when it comes to BTC. And I guess I am saying that it's a real problem vs. a currency with increasing difficulty and a non-finite supply.
> quality of life is never compromised (save for the last instant). It is the hardest thing in the world- and it should be.

You seem to understand, and admit, that you're doing something wrong. So: why do it? What is your justification for doing it?
ONE YEAR since the last commit, seriously?

Where are the tests? Composer?

Next.
The job of actually building things belongs to the lower and middle classes. It has most always been a point of distinction for the upper class that they aren't concerned with utility. Part of the point of being upper class is freeing yourself from having to do utilitarian work.
Magnus Carlsen, Chess’s Top-Ranked Player, Has Shrewd Marketing Strategy, Too