skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Strony www Bydgoszcz, strony internetowe Warszawa
Witamy wszystkich. Witamy, Firma Ifekt, z siedzibą w Bydgoszczy zajmuje się tworzeniem stron i e-sklepów dla firm i osób prywatnych z Bydgoszczy. Z chęcią pomożemy Państwa organizacji zyskać pozytywne opinie w Sieci . Tworzymy funkcjonalną nawigację dla osoby w każdym wieku i różnym stopniu łatwości w poruszaniu się po Internecie Proponujemy profesjonalne metody, które umożliwią Państwu wywrzeć pozytywny wizerunek w sieci. Wszystkie nasze realizacje dopasowujemy bezpośrednio do potrzeb naszych klientów. W celu uzyskania dokładniejszych informacji zapraszamy zainteresowanych stworzeniem strony www na www.ifekt.pl Wykonujemy zamówienia na terenie całej Polski, w szczególności w Elblągu i Bydgoszczy Nasz system zarządzania treścią CMS doskonale sprawdza się w obsłudze zarówno małych jak i rozbudowanych stron www oraz sklepów internetowych. Każdy stworzony przez firmę Ifekt sklep internetowy ma elegancką grafikę. Dodatkowo proponujemy wsparcie informatyczne dla instytucji w rejonach Bydgoszczy. Niezawodne rozwiązania firmy Ifekt i kooperacja z wykwalifikowaną kadrą to przede wszystkim pewność, iż zaprezentowany przez nas projekt spełni wszystkie Państwa wymogi.
I didn't even mention functional programming. Functional Programming is not always an option.
More details: https://www.dropbox.com/help/363/en

It looks like they support any app that uses the TOTP protocol, so google authenticator, among others, works with this seamlessly.
And how would that work exactly?
> Why exactly is profit / commerce considered a bad thing - especially here?

Maybe because donating to a cause is not considered commerce?
My dad: Apple just won right?

Me: No - they just lost big time - Apple is done.

Dad: Wait - What? They just won the court case and got a billion dollars to boot.

Me: That doesn't matter - Samsung won.

Dad: Explain.

Me: As soon as you have to sue your competition to remain competitive - you're done. Apple did the same thing with Microsoft in the nineties. Furthermore, Samsung builds not only many of Apple products - it's also leading the charge with the explosive growth of Android - open systems always win in the long run.

Dad: So Apple is done?

Me: Yeah - I sold my Apple stock after this very short case finished up. Funny thing is - the new CEO will be blamed for the fall set up by Steve Jobs - a damn shame if you ask me.
> I'm not sure I buy the "hygiene is harmful" argument or that we've gone overboard with it.

You can be hygienic and still cultivate behaviors that increase your exposure to safe levels of microbes. For instance, I always wash my hands after using the toilet but I’m less concerned than most about the use-by dates on food products and prefer to make decisions based on my sense of smell and taste. Not sure if that’s a good example.
IE8 =(
It's disappointing to see the personas that are trying to argue various justifications of Apple's policy on this. Apple's policy is clearly wrong. Arguing in favor of it is foolish.
Actually Apple has an obligation to defend their patents.

And this idea that Apple patented rectangles is just a figment of your imagination. And a sign of your ignorance.
> if I had a choice between jenkins and jenkins-clone-built-with-something-else, all things being equal I would choose jenkins-clone-built-with-something-else

What on earth for? It's not as if the Java binaries on a (non-multi-user) server somehow make it less secure.
There is a certain amount of Java stuff I have running at $work as well, and the one I really care the least about is Jenkins, at least it isn't executing random code from the web.

The one that has me worried way more is all of the Android build tools. I've had random crashes happen in them and there is no good way to debug the issue. Java throws stack traces that if printed would cost you a ream or two of paper and sometimes you get crashes in something completely unrelated.

Ugh, there are many things I wish for, but Java no longer existing is probably one of my biggest wishes.
Yeah, Sizzle will grab an element using `document.getElementById()` but only after checking the nodeType of the context, ensuring the selector is a string and running the selector through a regular expression.
I am rather curios now if it is possible to write the first pass in jQuery and then "compile" intelligently to native code like you would have written by hand. ;)
Apple is the most successful IT company in the world and they are the most profitable in the phone industry and have the greatest market share in the tablet and music player industries. So not sure how you come up with this ludicrous idea that they can't compete.

Also "open systems" always win ? Linux would like a word with you.
interesting - honestly I'm not familiar with maritime laws in the different countries. however enforcement by the navy seems much more unlikely than by local police forces (depending on the flag you're sailing under).
You mean DARPA?
I didn't read all of them, but the first, "Golds" caught my attention:

== SNIP ==

"I am currently on the phone (and have been for an hour) with ABC Financial, the company that handles billing for Large Gym chains Golds Gym, Lifequest Fitness (I'm sure there are others).

I've been trying to cancel my membership. I've been put on hold 4 times."
== SNIP ==

I've never had a gym membership that, by default, could be canceled via letter/fax/phone call. They all say the same thing,
"Come in to the gym in person, and cancel the membership."

Most of them also have a clause saying that you are renewed for a year if you don't cancel on your anniversary.

I always add a half dozen riders (and have the manager sign it) that says things like "If I get a job or move more than 25 miles away from the gym, I can send in a letter stating that, and cancel via registered mail." - Gym managers are usually reasonable, and will let you do that. Take 15 to 20 minutes to negotiate your Gym contract - you do realize it's a contract, right?

In 90% of these cases, people just aren't demonstrating personal responsibility for the contracts they've entered.

I'll say it again - never, ever, ever enter a recurring contract (or something that might _be_ a recurring contract) with your credit card, unless you have 100% control over the cancelation and terms.
This is basically the most famous text from RMS but with pop culture references. Not less true because of that...

And that's why i own a touchpad running a cyanogen build from me instead of the latest Apple fad. Or why i use Debian and gentoo instead of Ubuntu. (that last one will make the more clueless jumpy)
The barrier is convincing researchers that their code doesn't have to be beautiful to open source it, it just has to be checkable by someone else with the same domain knowledge.

Fortunately, a lot of the scientific Python community seems to be getting behind the idea of building IPython Notebooks that document scientific workflow. That seems to be a step in the right direction.
No. The logic employed here is the same logic that underpins liquidation preferences. If investors don't want to fund acqui-hire outcomes, they do in fact have more tools than a counteroffer.

The best operators are always going to get the best terms, but an industry-wide concern over acqui-hires could easily manifest itself in poorer terms for everyone else.
by any means you're still quite limited in the uk: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/contents
I'll take this opportunity to recommend that anyone who is in security should think about going to work at FireEye. Ridiculously cool technology, and they routinely lead Botnet takedowns to boot, e.g.

http://www.fireeye.com/news-events/press-releases/read/firee...

Email me at the email in my profile if you would like a warm intro.

Disclaimer: my brother is a long-time engineer.
I would pay serious money for this. Maybe $100 for a single 'call out' on the assumption that it would be an infrequent happening. Ferriss' 4HWW logically demands this, I guess.

--Supplemental--

Before anyone accuses me of being cheap, I'd be happy to pay $100 per hour, assuming the 'call out' would most likely be short in duration since it would be part of the deal that I supply a detailed wiki of the software under support.
I just looked at the latest jquery and its each statement does not do a native fallback, which really surprised me. Also you have to keep in mind that a simple $('a.active').each(someFunc), has to run through the a lot of jq luggage, plus the initial http fetch of the library (which has come under criticism for its size).
Is anyone surprised that Michael Arrington has soured relations with a vendor enough that they'd refuse to talk to him? Not I.

The dispute resolution process deals with these sorts of things and punishes merchants who repeatedly violate rules. Strategy number one is to not be a dick. People respond better that way and you won't end up in the situations Michael Arrington always seems to end up in.

I probably deal with as many merchants and as much travel as him and have always resolved such issues amicably.
I emphatically disagree.

In creating tutorials, the key is exercising restraint.

This is especially important when dealing with Emacs, which is a classic case of an almost complete lack of restraint
concerning the hierarchical organization of features. EmacsWiki is another great example of a huge tangled ball of knots.

Most experts forget exactly how impenetrable a new subject can seem to a beginner. I commend the tutor for not forgetting this!
My favorite intro to Tesla: http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/ef668caf14/drunk-history-vo...
I have absolutely no reason to trust credit companies as the unbiased vanguard of consumer protection. Signing an affidavit merely begins a process where the charge might go away, and I would expect that the process will get slower while ending up in the customer's favor less often.
Some more of these tricks, not specific to Facebook, are compiled here: http://wiki.darkpatterns.org/Main_Page

This wiki has been around for a number of years and I always thought it was a great idea. Shame it hasn’t really seemed to have taken off.
It may just be illustrating the problems with micro-benchmarks.
flagged as spam.
dajcie sobie siana :)
Groklaw has been a pretty reliable source for years now. Its disappointing that them presenting an opinion means they are labeled as "biased."
Don't you think I know that? I've owned their stock since 08. But the past isn't what matters - but chances for future growth.

Success always comes before the fall - Apple can either stabilise or fall. They will fall.

Linux won - Android is Linux. Consumer electronics are Linux. Servers are Linux. Everything runs on Linux. Microsoft is done.

Google wins. I own Google now.
Facebook recently caught up with me and all of my "fake" accounts.
One of the several reasons Debit cards are much worse and anti-consumer than Credit cards.

People think that because it has a Visa logo and their bank has a limited fraud liability policy that they're safe. That their debit cards have the same consumer protections as credit cards. That's just not the case.

Moreover, if you swipe-and-sign for anything you should be getting rewards or cash-back. Very few debit cards offer rewards, and the ones that do are often less lucrative than those offered on credit cards.
Roberts is collected one long detailed case study. Sample size of 1, no controls, no blinding and tiny experiments.

Ghost hunters and anti-vaxxers have better science behind their pet theories.

We expect this type of endeavour to be extraordinarily prone to influence from noise. The entire modern process of science has been built to control for external factors that Roberts is ignoring or outright embracing.

And no one should be surprised when he finds links between brain function and dental amalgam, which is both preposterous and specific to an existing hypothesis common among other pseudosciences. Isn't this just more evidence that the unblinded nature of Roberts anomaly hunting is being skewed by bias?

That doesn't mean that some of the things he has found aren't true but 100+ years of trial and error and deep thought on this single issue by an enormous number of intelligent people taking the most meticulous records humanity has ever produced all around the world have determined that his methods will produce more false correlations than true ones.

The failure to produce previous controlled experiments is alarming. I'm just baffled as to why you think that removing controls and oversight and experimenter blinding and lowering the sample size, TO ONE, as well as taking a single data point for some "experiments" would in any way make it better?
> Was anyone else surprised by the performance penalty of jQuery? Over 400x hit for getElementsByTagName!

Not really. Just replacing document.getElementsByTagName by document.querySelectorAll (the native, browser-implemented version of what jQuery does) will generate a 150-200x perf hit depending on the browser.

The reason for that is twofold: first, getElementsByTagName doesn't have to parse the selector, figure out what is asked for, and potentially fall back on explicit JS implementation (jQuery supports non-native selectors. In fact, I believe you can implement your own selectors). But the parsing overhead should be minor in this precise case.

Second, the real reason for the difference, getElementsByTagName cheats something fierce: it doesn't return an Array like everybody else, it returns a NodeList. And the nodelist is lazy, it won't do anything before it needs to. Essentially, just calling document.getElementsByTagName is the same as calling an empty function. If you serialize the nodelist to an array (using Array.prototype.slice.call), bam 150~200x perf hit.

See http://jsperf.com/vanillajs-by-tag/2 for these two alterations added to the original "vanilla JS" perf cases.

There is a significant overhead to jQuery, but it's ~3x compared to the equivalent DOM behavior, not 400x.
My gym offers a membership - $30/month with credit card and a one year term, no initiation fee, or $50/month, $75 initiation fee on a month-by-month basis. When I sign up for the one year membership, I put my signature on a contract, indicating that I will oblige by all the conditions.

Should I be allowed to sign up for the one year term, and then cancel my credit card after a couple months?

Whenever you enter a contract, there are conditions that must be fulfilled to cancel that contract. Simply saying "I didn't read those conditions" or "I don't want the product anymore" is not a sufficient condition to terminate the contract. And thinking that you can get out of it by "canceling the credit card" is naive in my opinion.
Isn't there another way to find some place on earth (preferably an island) that will be outside international conventions? Wouldn't that be more viable and cheaper than seasteading? I wonder if there have been attempts to do something like that in collaboration with some government.

Regardless, this could be a profound experiment. If something good comes out of it, people will demand changes in world governance. (We ran out of governance ideas after the last french revolution)

It's important for the institute to be completely transparent about what is being conducted there (legal or not), or else people are going to turn against it.
> This discussion is a bit like how assembly programmers used to defend not moving to a high level language long after the performance benefits were not worth it any more.

But we're not at that point in the web yet. The performance benefits are worth it. Just try out JQuery Mobile if you want to see what wasted CPU cycles can do.
Show HN: Candlepin, a curated HTML5 game subscription service
Big distinction is that Apple lost their big court case with Microsoft in the 90s.
So in your ideal world art and music and inspiration have no value because they don't directly save babies?

Did you post the same under all the Neil Armstrong eulogies?

Or perhaps we're all missing your sense of humor. I love dark humor but yours isn't very artful.

I am actually very critical of the materialism of modern culture and how we put our energies into building stupid shit like Pinterest and most of Facebook, or as Jeff Hammerbacher recently said, "The best minds of my generation are thinking about how to make people click ads… That sucks."
Samsung ripped off Apples design, there's no excusing this:

http://i.imgur.com/qN6n9.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/FJkZE.png

They're clearly in the wrong here. It's not about the fundamental form factor of the devices, it's about blatant plagiarism. Apple's designs are aren't perfect, and instead of perfecting or improving the devices (which would be better for consumers), they simply didn't think about it. Shame on you Samsung.
How the Astronauts Self-Insured Their Lives
Well, one concern is moral hazard. why is co for sale?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_hazard

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hold-up_problem
Key point here is suing your competition to remain competitive is an indicator of a coming fall.
"Dan Pallotta is an expert in nonprofit sector innovation and a pioneering social entrepreneur. He is the founder of Pallotta TeamWorks, which invented the multiday AIDSRides and Breast Cancer 3-Days"

What exactly is inventive in Breast Cancer 3 Days? The fact that you can walk for 3 days and raise money at the same time? I guess I'm missing some important detail here (honest, I'm not trolling, I genuinely can't see anything too inventive).
I'm surprised by the number of comments like this.

jQuery has to parse the selector and figure out that it's of the form "#id". This requires running a regular expression. A lot more is happening.

The whole jQuery call from start to finish takes 2.85 microseconds, in what is presumably a real benchmark, but microbenchmarks like this are hard to interpret and basically meaningless. But yes, if your app needs to do a burst of 350,000 jQuery calls in a tight loop and you are bummed that the whole thing takes a full second, you should then optimize using document.getElementById.
My experience with Gold's Gym is you call the number (for ABC Financial) and they tell you to mail a letter to them. They were very friendly, no hold time, but couldn't (wouldn't?) cancel over the phone. I got the phone number from trying to cancel in person at the gym. The people working the desk didn't appear to be getting paid enough to care too much (on the bright side, they didn't try to sell my anything I didn't want when I signed up. They told me $30 a month, take it or leave it).

Overall, I had to mail a letter and pay for an extra month's membership (and a stamp), but it wasn't that bad. Supposedly my contract required 60 days notice, I didn't care enough to check. People get burned up about these things, I figure there's more important things in life than $30 for a gym membership I didn't use.
Maybe you haven't, but it happens all the time. Years ago when I was cleaning-up some credit mess I made when I was still in school I spent a lot of time learning on Creditboards.com and that was a very common collection people would seek help with.

Creditboards is a fantastic resource and I cleaned up several small (and one large) collection item from my reports far earlier than the 7.5 years the FCRA lets negative info stay on a report.
Good riddance. As everyone who goes to a fund raise for whatever, and then live happily under a gov that spends 100x that everyday in war and other shenanigans, like a legal system for the rich.

centralized charity never did any good to the world. Except to a few militias in Africa.
Projektowanie stron internetowych Warszawa
Hi, we are top web design company. Look to our projects
http://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/ex54j/seeking_clarif... summarizes my feelings on it nicely.
Also there is block scope. let { ... }
I'm glad they didn't invent their own mechanism but used standard OTP tokens, so you can just add them to apps like Google Authenticator.
http://www.csmonitor.com/About/The-Monitor-difference
yes, you should.

Your contract is between yourself and your gym, the bank should have no part in either enforcing or stopping its fulfilment unless it is asked to by the courts.
> is the 'Speed Comparison' for real?

Depends what you mean by "for real". The document.getElementsByTagName comparison is bullshit: gEBTN is lazy, just calling it basically doesn't do any work, it just allocates a NodeList object and returns.

If you serialize the nodelist to an array or use document.querySelector instead (it returns an array) you get ~3x between the native version and the slowest libraries, not 400x.
I feel the same as you, but the movement is evolving in the alt-med/pseudoscience direction really quickly. Amateurs are collecting tons of cool data (amazing!) and then doing their amateur analysis (Ancient Aliens level depressing!).

Without a very strong internal pressure to get their shit together and act like smart people who understand that some problems require expertise the movement is screwed.
If a recurring charge comes with a contractual obligation, then it should be up to the merchant to collect when billing information ceases to be valid.
Should I be allowed to sign up for the one year term, and then cancel my credit card after a couple months?

Yes, you should. Because it's not the credit card companies responsibility to worry about what outstanding contracts you may or may not still have ongoing.

It would be up to the merchant to pursue legal action if your attempt to defraud the contract was substantial enough for them to care. If this was an ongoing problem for them, they would have to debate if their "deal" is really valued by their consumers and worth continuing to offer.

But, it's not Visa's problem to worry about these things.
I agree that measurement is an outstanding way to build a team. But, it is not a goal onto itself. Overarching the measurement needs to be a clear purpose.

This may seem insanely obvious, but sharing a single set of common goals can be really powerful and it is often surprising, but common, when you dig into a team to find no single vision or goal. The devs are concentrating on feature X, the sales people are selling future Y, the product people are planning feature Z. A single goal for the day/week/month can be revolutionary to a team used to working their own skills in isolation.
Or that losing a key look and feel lawsuit means the competition can copy you without fear, losing your distinctiveness.

I don't think its that black and white but suggesting the lawsuit, and not the lawsuit outcome, is somehow responsible for a company's lack-of-success is silly.
Except that consumers almost always win such disputes and they are really not very burdensome. So bitching about this process is really just bitching.
No, it's not. There is one more requirement - the LLVM IR has to work exactly the same as intended for python (in this case as cpython does). This is not the case - it's not full and what's implemented does not support all the corner cases of the language, starting with overflow-to-long.