skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That would only be a relevant distinction if the discussion were specifically about realized damages. It is not.

The discussion is about whether or not ignoring something that is of little consequence to you diminishes a later case you might bring when something substantially similar causes you noticeable problems. The question at hand had nothing to do with damages due to piracy (direct, perceived, hypothetical, legal fiction, or otherwise).

It's confusing because the basis for the legal claim is damages due to piracy and the size of that claim probably hasn't shifted all that much. But the motivating interest is not the damages. It is the impact of the thing on their employment. That impact was not present before so no one was inclined to pursue a protracted uphill battle.
There's probably something horrific you can do with TrueType to make it more complex than a substitution cipher.
Misinformation isnt
Let me explain how that works in the real world — you drop all the tags/boxes/receipts for the merchandise, maybe apply some dirt, then you can claim that it's not new and you brought it with you from your home country originally. Also in the airport there is a rather high chance you get to go through the green lane where your bags aren't checked. There are certain manners that help with not being singled out for the bag check. How do regular people learn these? When you live in the corrupt country, you quickly learn how to look ordinary and not interesting to the authorities.
I tried to use the free Gemini google tier for the longest time until a few months ago. For a while, i was using it as a 2nd or 3rd backup response. After a lot of disappointment , I finally gave up. The responses vs Grok and OpenAI were nothing short of atrocious. Plus, a lot of content was effectively kneecapped behind censor walls.

Is it really true the 2.5 is actually good ?
In a lot of cities the broadcast towers are concentrated in the same place, I wonder how effective it could be.
Additional tangential (certainly not helping to answer the question but I can't resist an opportunity to share) shout outs to Warmth (and his ARCHIVES record label), and the Deep Breakfast Series (I love the entries from Owl, Clearlight, Inhmost, ASC, Jamie McCue aka Silent Season, ASIP and Patrick Russell), among many, many others.

https://archivesdubmusic.bandcamp.com/album/parallel

https://on.soundcloud.com/ShxKh8itMgmfmqei7
2007 Toyota Camry. I looked it up, it's actually worth even less than I thought it was haha.
Yup, maintained an e-commerce site where the products were coming from a third party api and the products often had 200+ properties and we often needed certain combinations of them to be present to display them. We created schemas for all of them and also had to transform the data quite a bit and used union types extensively, so when displaying a product list with hundreds of these products, Zod would take some time(400+ ms) for parsing through that. Valibot took about 50ms. And the editor performance was also noticeably worse with Zod, taking up to three seconds for code completion suggestions to pop up or type inference to complete - but truth be told valibot was not significantly better here at the time.

I agree though, that filling your website with tracking crap is a stupid idea as well.
What happens when people are tol
1. Don't trust the media
2. Don't trust the opposition
3. Don't trust the experts

Doesn't this lead to a situation where only bad actors exist?

It people are so savy because of advertising why did tens of millions believe the election was stolen?
My issue is we're still talking about the GOP as it is behaving now. My question is how were we allowed to get to this point? Trump is declaring national emergencies and using emergency powers, but where did he get those powers from? Why did the DNC allow the executive branch to obtain those powers in the first place? When Trump lost to Biden why didn't the congress spend the next 4 years stripping the executive branch of all the scary powers they had been abdicating over the last century? And sure you might argue that they didn't control both houses, but the reality is they didn't even try. No one will look back on the Biden presidency as a time period under which the DNC fought valiantly to reign in the clear loop holes and abusive potential of the executive branch but were stymied despite their best efforts by obstructionist GOP opponents. For that matter, they didn't even spend the time trying to expand the capabilities of the minority party to better reign in an abusive majority.

Let's take your example on the tariffs here. Either this was a power granted before the Trump presidency and one that the DNC should have worked to revoke sometime in the last 4 years if it was so easily abused, or it was a power congress granted this session, in which case why didn't they use that all powerful fillabuster to hold it back? This is what I mean when I ask why we should believe the DNC is even capable of defending this democracy. We are where we are because the DNC apparently found it more convenient to be complicit in the abdication of governmental power to the executive branch on the mistaken belief that those powers would never be abused. Then when Trump was elected for the first time, they didn't take that as a wakeup call and spend the next 8 years fighting tooth and nail "all hand s on deck" to reign in the powers of the executive branch. It's not like Trump wasn't talking up tariff and trade wars before, but apparently the DNC couldn't envision actually losing to him again? Which is another strike against their ability to effectively govern. Twice now (Bush II and Trump) they have supposedly lost the presidency to electoral shenanigans and then managed to lose to the same candidate a second time and that second time lose unequivocally. How? How is this party so inept as to lose a second time by a worse margin to a candidate that they managed to effectively tie the first time?
Nothing new here. See the details on H100 hobbling:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42846704
The docs have a bit of a rough edge because the author is Korean, but the examples are quite good and took me maybe 2-3 hours to work through.

Once everything clicked (quite shortly in), I was a bit blown away by everything "just working" as pure TypeScript; I can only describe the DX as "smooth" compared to Zod because now it's TypeScript.
https://metacpan.org/pod/JSON::XS#JSON-and-YAML
> then regular IP-based rate limits should work fine right?

These are also harmful to human users, who are often behind CGNAT and may be sharing a pool of IPs with many thousands of other ISP subscribers.
I can’t help but wonder what all this means for the environment. Reminds me of the book Brave New World. Where prosperity is directly tied to consumption.
Probably factory defaults exposed to the world
Have you tried https://github.com/block/goose ?
Realize the administration is not competent or ethical. It fits their behavior and has predictive value.
> his disaster of a political career.

45th and 47th president of the USA as a disaster seems to be setting the bar unbelievably high for failure.
fzf 0.60.3-1 from March 3rd is the latest in Debian, 0.61.1 from April 4 the latest upstream, so Debian is not exactly ancient. I guess you are using stable Debian? That doesn't get newer upstream releases, if you want the latest Debian fzf you can just install the build from unstable, which should work fine since Go does static linking, and there are often backports for when unstable packages can't be installed on stable.

https://github.com/junegunn/fzf/tags
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fzf
A long time ago, Victor Yodaiken told me the best way to learn C was the old, K&R book. The explanations, examples, and even pitfalls were all explained well. My code worked without much fuss. That's probably because C hasn't changed much.

I ended up switching to Python for job requirements after getting through half the book. If I re-learn C, I'll go back to it. If it were C++, that would be a totally, different story since they kept piling features on over time.
It's more than that. What you say is true about his character, but there is also a playbook to keep power. The autocrats copy one another. And he has people like Steven Bannon who are strategizing how he can serve a third term.
Republican voters can see many if not all of the same economic ills in society that Democrat voters do. In some cases they can even agree on the cause. I'm not going to stand next to how right-wing media (and its eager audience) may characterize "main stream media". But I do think the window of representation across how americans see and characterize ourselves through newsrooms in general has narrowed too far (in its seemingly-permanently partisan polarization) to sustain a rational democracy. Social media and the internet have provided the means to see this clearer than ever, in both great and terrible ways. A lot of contradictions in society about values we have and language we use as a people will have to resolve now.

All I can say is I hope we see a real economic policy response from democrats in congress, and fast. They seem to be fishing around for ideas in all the wrong pockets (foreign interests, domestic private interests, namely not the daily interests of the majority of their constituents).... but even rhetorically, it would be a start.
I completely understand TypeScript, Zod not so much. The context here is performance.

My understanding is that Zod performs synchronous operations to validate the schemas. Something about "using the tool correctly" resonates here. Maybe don’t validate very large and nested schemas frequently and things like that.

But I can’t help but think it is adding another layer of potential footguns that you have to be mindful about. Maybe the benefits outshine the risks in disciplined teams that understand both the tool and the runtime. However I can’t help but think about the less disciplined teams abusing Zod and then wondering why things are slow.
Is there no one left to ask?
Maybe? Isn't WebSockets basically TCP? Roughly? I wrote that WebSockets provide reliable bi-directional streams, but it actually doesn't. It implements message framing. WebTransport also doesn't support "unreliable streams", it's actually called "datagrams". WebTransport doesn't even have to be used over HTTP/3 per the latest spec, so is it basically WebSockets reimplemented in HTTP/3? No.
People who have been posting against the Israeli genocide have been familiar with this for a long time now. The censorship is extremely evident; thankfully the truth is coming out. Food for thought: if you are on the side of truth, you do not need to censor.
The thing that makes libraries like Zod trustworthy is that they:

- parse as their validation mechanism

- compose small units (close to the type system’s own semantics for their runtime equivalents, trivially verifiable), with general composition semantics (also close to the type system), into larger structures which are (almost) tautologically correct.

Obviously there’s always room for some error, but the approach is about as close to “safe” as you can get without a prover. The most common source of error isn’t mistakes in the underlying implementation but mistakes in communicating/comprehending nuances of the semantics (especially where concepts like optionality and strictness meet concepts like unions and intersections, which are also footguns in the type system).
Related coverage and analysis on The Volokh Conspiracy too: https://reason.com/volokh/2025/04/11/the-fantastical-showerh...
How much of this kinda stuff is also about lithography etc? re: https://medium.com/@thechinaacademy/china-may-be-constructin...

I know FCC is firmly science, but curious: does it help in this area of tech also?
i wonder if there is an easily available 68k board. not a lot out there that i could easily find. the fpga board that MiSTeR seems like a good candidate though
The alternative is to write code yourself.
Last time I saw, the entire Supreme Court was requesting that the Executive return people, what means punishment may be a couple of weeks away. It may not happen, but it's not a given right now.
GrapheneOS has the standard support for E911 that's triggered when the user makes an emergency call. It enables location services in a special way automatically as it does in the stock OS. What we don't currently do is overriding our 2 user-facing toggles for A-GNSS where users can choose to disable or change the server from ours for PSDS and SUPL if they want (they're still enabled by default), although we've considered adding it.

Another thing we don't currently do is force enabling network-based location for emergency calls. GrapheneOS has network-based location disabled by default. See https://grapheneos.org/features#network-location and https://grapheneos.org/usage#network-location. It's a semi-offline implementation based on the Apple location service with both GrapheneOS proxy and Apple options. Fully offline network-based location is planned. Google's services is fully online and makes the position estimates service-side as opposed to iOS and GrapheneOS doing that client side. iOS has network-based location enabled by default and only added an opt-out a couple weeks ago in iOS 18.4. Google Mobile Services devices have a default-enabled toggle in the initial setup wizard and have the Wi-Fi scanning and Bluetooth scanning toggles enabled by default to make scans work with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth otherwise disabled which is always how it works in iOS.

Google's Android Emergency Location Service is not required to share location with emergency services. There are already standard ways to do that. They added an extra system which sends it out-of-band rather than in the standard way. https://www.android.com/safety/emergency-help/emergency-loca... has more info on that. This isn't included in GrapheneOS but isn't needed for this.
But I don’t understand. Why not both? You can have a short answer and rebuttal and still be kind and nonaggressive.
I mean... knowing how to solve it isn't the trick, it's doing it a million times a minute for your firehose scraper.
The ones that require base stations like the BB are not very portable.
Right, I do understand that with some setup involved, there are ways to search against encrypted messages but simply being given a brand new chunk of encrypted data with no prior knowledge of the contents would be impossible for anyone to index other than the recipient using the key. There would definitely be a way for the client-side to automatically download an encrypted email, decrypt it, index it, and keep an index database using whatever method while simultaneously keeping the originally encrypted email secure on the server.
GSUB rules are inherently local, so for example the same cryptanalysis approach should work for space-separated words instead of letters. A polyalphabetic cipher would work better but that means you can't ever share the same internal glyph for visually same but differently encoded letters.
GrapheneOS does support E911, but not the recently added Android Emergency Location service which is not standard and not required for this. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43669766. Triangulation via the cellular network is an older method for when E911 isn't supported.
Listen to their ministers and people in charge and they clearly state the intent outright. This latest conflict has exposed everything.
What matters is loyalty. The chess being played is for full unitary executive power, essentially making Trump an autocrat. Everyone bends the knee to him, or is too powerless or afraid to oppose. Like what has happened with Putin in Russia.
I noticed the article uses the Polyvers font (complete with bold capitals in the headings), which I haven't seen on the Internet. Wonder what that is.

EDIT: It seems to coexist with U001, which is "An Univers-like typeface that comes with GhostPDL made by URW++."
I picked up a Quest 3 headset, with the thoughts of using it coding when I had to deal with a hotel style work desk. The text was just not sharp enough to be usable for programming.
Execution is incredible, and the idea is far from bad, but I must I say that it is certainly hilarious. Giving serious “we’ve figured out a way to more durably connect microservices!” energy.

Ngl, I see a non-zero chance of this kind of aesthetic catching on for nerdy blogs, which tends to proliferate to the wider web eventually. If nothing else, I love some support for those of us who spend all day reading (stylized) Markdown syntax!
It seems that it has something that is close enough to regex to do the job most of the time
You probably don't have network-based location enabled. Satellite-based location doesn't work well indoors and takes a while to get a lock. Network-based location support was recently added to GrapheneOS and is opt-in. See https://grapheneos.org/features#network-location and https://grapheneos.org/usage#network-location.
>Does anyone even check if the bots' IP ranges belong to the AI companies?

Sounds like a fun project for an AbuseIPDB contributor. Could look for fake Googlebots / Bingbots, etc, too.
Those images on the interstitial page(s) while waiting for Anubis to complete its check are so cute! (I’ve always found all the art and the characters in Xe’s blog very beautiful)

Tangentially, I was wondering how this would impact common search engines (not AI crawlers) and how this compares to Cloudflare’s solution to stop AI crawlers, and that’s explained on the GitHub page. [1]

> Installing and using this will likely result in your website not being indexed by some search engines. This is considered a feature of Anubis, not a bug.

> This is a bit of a nuclear response, but AI scraper bots scraping so aggressively have forced my hand.

> In most cases, you should not need this and can probably get by using Cloudflare to protect a given origin. However, for circumstances where you can't or won't use Cloudflare, Anubis is there for you.

[1]: https://github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis/
> I'm not sure why you say it's a scandal. The author worked with the publishing company from the start, and from the start the intention was to "unveil" the truth to make an impact.

That just means he didn’t lie alone. They lied as a group. They lied to the newspapers that interviewed Jianwei Xun, they lied to the bookstores that sold a non-existent author, they lied to readers and academics, they violated the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, which considers it a serious offense to fail to label AI-generated text, video, or audio. The book doesn’t clarify this in any of its editions.[1]

I get your point about the marketing strategy. That doesn’t change the fact that it was a lie.

Several newspapers have already retracted or pulled their original articles about the “clever stunt” by the Italian author. New spanish editions will now include an explanation of the actual writing process (with AI), as well as the mixed identity behind the author's name.[2]

A scandal.

And yes, I think the experiment is interesting. But they lied, not just my opinion. That’s what every newspapers who interviewed a ghost is now saying.

> According to interviews, he used AI platforms in a very specific way that couldn't be called "vibe philosophizing"

I was referring to the intellectuals now justifying the experiment of working with AI. (They’ve basically discovered “vibe philosophizing”) I wasn’t referring to him. He clearly knew what he was doing.

> It seems he treated the AI as a mirror instead of a system that would give him answers.

Right. Except… I’m not the one saying:

- “Jianwei Xun emerged in late 2024 as a distributed philosophical entity born from the collaborative interaction between human intelligence and artificial intelligence systems.”

- “Xun's true nature as a hybrid intellectual construct…”

That’s from the author’s own official page.[3]

[1] https://english.elpais.com/technology/2025-04-07/jianwei-xun...
[2] https://www.lanacion.com.ar/tecnologia/jianwei-xun-autor-de-...
[3] https://jianweixun.com/
> it’s difficult to discern any coherent U.S. strategy—assuming one even exists

Not sure why there is a presumption that one exists or that its coherent. With even the slightest critical eye its easy enough to discern that this isn't about economic policy or trade and that the proposed "policy" doesn't make any sense. The guy in charge of this stuff is either seeing what he can get away with, fucking with people, or building a narrative...

that is to say what you are watching isn't "real".
upload yourself

You mean “upload a copy of yourself”, right? I guess I would be happy for my uploaded copy to live forever while I continue to age.
You do competitive games?
Those have been so far Proton's biggest weakness, but that's usually less of a technical limitation and more of a company decision, which given enough pressure can be changed
What do you call this then? [1]

[1] https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/smotrich-says-not-even-gr...
Also found by the study: people choose the food with the highest expected caloric content when hungry (actually the #1 correlate, ahead of expected tastiness), which seems unsurprising. The paper doesn't seem to have any way of dealing systematically with obvious correlations (or anti-correlations) of perceptions of tastiness, healthiness, and expected caloric content, or the obvious theory that people tend to choose the food that they think has the highest caloric content when they are hungry. The entire paper seems statistically perilous.
"Just be rich, bro".
All the AR glasses are stuck at 1080p still. :-/
Sounds like extensive efforts writing blueprints for a cathedral.

While it'd already be siesta time in the bazaar having earlier eaten your lunch.
Being liberal in what you accept, also known as the “robustness principle”, doesn’t mean being ambiguous or surprising about how you accept it. If anything, robustness requires a great deal more precision and clarity (at least with your own reasoning, then with how you communicate what to expect from it).
I don't need to translate them to English, I speak Hebrew. There are far right ministers who say insane things, there are far left ministers who say the exact opposite, and both call themselves Zionists. You don't speak Hebrew so you need someone to point you to tweets to translate, and you've been pointed only at the far right ones and that's why you think those are the only ones that exist.

If it was actually "check, check, and check" for 77 years, the population would go down, obviously, unless you believe Palestinians are each the second coming of Jesus Christ and can return from the dead at will. No serious academic scholarship agrees with you, and common sense is that you're wrong too. A genocide involves actually attempting to destroy a lot of people systematically, not periodic violence over land squabbles in which neither side is significantly reduced.

There is certainly debate over whether the current war — starting on Oct. 7th — has devolved into genocide, although there isn't scholarly agreement on that (nor legal agreement, as the international courts haven't issued rulings yet; they've only declined to dismiss the case). But a 77-year genocide is a fantasy, in order to avoid thinking deeply about your preferred side's complicity in this endless conflict — and indeed in the current war, which they started, and in which they committed numerous war crimes (and continue to commit war crimes).
What software were you using, Virtual Desktop? I find it super clear in a Quest 3 and I often work for hours in it.
My issue is ts server perromance not so much runtime
https://circlesofcaredatasettlement.com/
I hope when they do their testing they cover a diverse age range. Um, it’s not the same when you get older. ;p
Why are universities paying DOE at all? I've worked projects with user facilities and no money changed hands for those.
Real title: "Three Things That Matter".

(Science, education, and people.)
How would one clean the inside of the "Cornucopia" design?