skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I built a ZK-Rollup, PQC, and AI blockchain solo – here's the architecture
Over the past two years, I’ve been designing a blockchain protocol from scratch — with zk-Rollups, post-quantum encryption (Kyber + Dilithium), AI-based gas optimization, and DAG sharding.

It’s called KAELIT.

No token. No presale. No VC.
Just architecture, vision, and conviction.

Here’s the GitHub architecture repo if you’re curious:
github[dot]com/KAELITcom/-kaelit-research

(Replace [dot] with "." — HN blocks GitHub for new accounts)
As AI is hot recently, there is also some AI in this tool -- the app icon is made using AI.
Other businesses not exempt from these tariffs should sue for violation of equal protection. Equal protection under the law means equal treatment under the law and this absolutely is not equal treatment at all.
Call me a weedy or grabby representative of our biosphere
The paper doesn't seem to actually define their categories anywhere. Am I just missing it? Or am I meant to intuitively know the difference between "spied on / watched" and "spy / surveillance"?

Edit - upon re-reading, it seems like they're just using the themes present in the underlying literature, with _extremely_ conservative merging. Which makes the headline claim, that there are 37 distinct themes, pretty pointless. Is "spied on" really a distinct theme from "surveillance"? More likely, there's just no standardised name for it.
Good question. I think it's really just status quo. I got Peacock for free thru Xfinity and it was ad supported, but when I left Xfinity I just kept the same tier. Same with Hulu; my wife had ad Hulu before we got married and when we merged finances I had to reason to upgrade. But Netflix/HBO with ads just seems weird to me.
Seems to also especially love making up options and settings for command line tools.
Tried a video, got "invalid digit found in string". I will stick with ffmpeg on termux I guess.
Personally I have yet to see a game where unlocks didn’t tend to be MUCH better than the starting set
Because I dont want to work with AI agents? I like my work to be fun, as in "I could bear working 8 hours a day with this."
I like thinking about the problems and solutions and how that translates to code. I like implementing it with my own hands. Substitute that with writing prompts and I'll look for a different career thats actually fun.
If the LLM is "making up" APIs that don't exists, I'm guessing they've been introduced as the model tried to generalize from the training set, as that's the basic idea? These invented APIs might represent patterns the model identified across many similar libraries, or other texts people have written on the internet, wouldn't that actually be a sort of good library to have available if it wasn't already? Maybe we could use these "hallucinations" in a different way, if we could sort of know better what parts are "hallucination" vs not. Maybe just starting points for ideas if nothing else.
That was 40 years ago. If people wanted to program inside out with lots of nesting then unfold it in their head, they would have done it at some point a long time ago. It just isn't how people want to work.

People don't work in postfix notation either, even though it would be more direct to parse. What people feel is clearer is much more important.
The study was aptly supported in part by the University of Waterloo.

If you expect to see the new designs in public restrooms anytime soon, though, you should curb your enthusiasm.

I'll see myself out …
You're just shifting the goalposts here.

I will still stick with them because they're better value than the American alternatives, but that's beside the point.

You were arguing that the same number of dollars will get me the same number of goods and services, which is not true.
isn't this ancient history now? the formations in the last 50 years are large
Knowing keyboard shortcuts of your chosen tools. Makes you so much faster and effective.
> "assuming one even exists"

I actually doubt it does. Everyting is just too chaotic to be a strategy.
I actually saw a talk by Gabrielle Corso at a workshop belt at Google's Toronto offices this week. Very cool to see this posted here.
Okta was going to charge us $6/user/month just for MFA. So I migrated my company to Azure AD with free MFA. We still had AD DS in the mix, but endpoint management was moving to cloud w/ Autopilot + Intune.

An on-prem AD DS is going to be difficult to move away from. From a management cost perspective, it is still cheaper than every other LDAP + Kerb + endpoint policy solution out there. And since a CAL is provided with every copy of Windows Enterprise, thinking about CALs for clients is a non-issue.
> Honest to god, if an IdP like Okta made an Active Directory replacement that ran via container

https://goauthentik.io/ can run in docker. It can be paired in with openldap containers, too.
> Giving a damn.

This is an underrated skill. I agree, the bar is so low that even a little bit of care/user empathy will make you stand out.
Ending 20 Year Old Friendships Using Genetic Algorithms
You know who also told everyone what he was going to do? And about whom everyone said "nah he's not really that crazy, he's just pretending for his supporters". Hitler. Also just stating facts.
Thanks for checking this out — happy to answer any questions or technical feedback.

No token, no presale, no marketing.
Just architecture, vision, and conviction.
chaos is the strategy
ChatGPT Has Receipts, Will Now Remember Everything You've Ever Told It
Chartist.js is all SVG based and < 10kb in size (no external dependencies)

https://gionkunz.github.io/chartist-js/index.html
https://archive.is/0vfWF

This article is a huge nothing-burger that seems to hinge on the sentence "some would-be AI sleuths claim that the em dash is seldom seen outside of AI text," which is just plain nonsense.
They use the billing address. KYC makes it easy.
The result is still that certain companies are getting exemptions for their products while others aren't. And there is no real rhyme or reason behind these decisions
No, I’m saying call them out on the shit they _are_ doing that you don’t want them to do, and don’t drag every mention of them into the same topic ad nauseum.
There's a pretty amazing video here showing a Prince Rupert's drop defeaing a hydraulic press: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ns7PQjjqHIo
I only use it for keeping an eye on my budget, I don't really trust automated systems to cancel things for me. But it does let me know what to cancel manually.
I think most people would have a different understanding of what's entailed in an "update".
I don't get it. Don't you want to give as much feedback as possible in the beginning, before bad habits form and relationships are permanently soured?
Ask HN: Would you buy full-featured, well-documented boilerplate if I built it?
Everything you need to go from 0 to launch:

Authentication – Powered by Supabase + Auth.js with Magic Links (signup, login, logout)

Database – MongoDB & Supabase to store all user actions

Payments – Fully integrated with Stripe, LemonSqueezy & DodoPayments

Security – Fully protected routes and APIs

Frontend – Clean, blazing-fast UI/UX built with Next.js

Backend – Logic-ready with Node.js, JavaScript & TypeScript

Notifications – Built-in email and push notifications via Resend (with custom templates via Newdot Email)

Analytics – Track everything with Vercel Analytics & DataFast

Hosting – Deploy to Vercel, Netlify, Render, or AWS — your choice

Support – Real-time feedback and support with Crisp & Insight

Legal Pages – Terms, Privacy Policy, and Imprint included with ready-made prompts

SEO & Marketing – Meta tags, social previews, and more

Performance – Optimized for 100% uptime

Would you buy this if I built it as a production-ready boilerplate with clean code and solid documentation?

Drop a if you’re in.
I am constantly correcting the AI code it gives me, and all I get for it is "oh your right! here is the corrected code"

then it gives me more hallucinations

correcting the latest hallucination results in it telling me the first hallucination
Is glass still considered a form of liquid? Think I remember reading something about that years ago.
What do you get from it? Specially considering that from above "programs that work together go in the same context"..
That's definitely how it looks like
Compare salaries between tech companies
This is pretty much how I expected this to play out, at least for now. Trump acts all tough and doesn't back down publicly, but China actually doesn't back down. So what happens is that some businesses get exemptions to mitigate the impact. Then some fine print gets changed about how the rules are enforced. Like, suddenly it turns out that Kiribati is a major electronics supplier to the US :)

End result - US economy takes a hit, China takes a smaller hit. Trade balance widens further, most likely. The rich get richer, while many small companies struggle to survive.
>of 1,050 posts HRW documented as taken-down or suppressed on Facebook or Instagram, 1,049 involved peaceful content

The issue is that we are not talking about posts which would normally be taken down by Facebook.
Yeah that's my logic too. "It's full moon again... better make the most of it!"
From being in a company with places across all of Europe, I've also found that "heated" means very different things in different places. Like, I'm exaggerating a little bit, but the calm discussion where to get dinner in Spain can be a lot more energetic than a very heated discussion about a strategic problem between some Brits and Germans.

But with less jest - I think we have a very good discussion culture in the team at work. No one on the team is scared to disagree, or to point out that this doesn't seem to go towards a positive direction. It's just not a heated discussion.

At times during these planning sessions, we just sit in silent thought and maybe doodling something in Excalidraw or on paper for a few minutes until someone is like "I need more input on X", or "So I have a rough plan I think?" or "I think there is an issue with that idea", even if it's not clear why - if 2 or 3 people are vaguely not fine with something, it's probably a bad idea. And we've also started to learn each others tells if we're not happy.
Try Aider with Gemini 2.5.
Correct, the above posted ignored the four prongs of fair use:

1. Is the work more educational or commercial.

2. What is the nature of the underlying work (creative works are more protected).

3. Is the work transformative.

4. What will be the impact on the underlying work's market.

Search engines do not make their internal copies available, compete in an entirely different market (that benefits the makers of the underlying works) and are considered quite transformative because they enable discovering vast information on the internet.

On the other hand, almost zero LLMs/Text-to-Image generators are educational in nature (certainly none of the ones being sued for copyright infringement). They frequently are trained on highly creative works like art and writing. Some of the work could be transformative, depending on where the learned data manifold the output of your request lies on, but a huge amount is similar to the training data. Lastly, these models have an outsized negative impact on the underlying markets, by being vastly cheaper compared to a human's labor, and for dubious quality at that.
I think that German bureaucrats choose the path of least resistance. Most of the time it means giving you what you ask for.

When you get the short end of the stick, a letter from your lawyer can make it abundantly clear that giving you what you want (and faster) is the path of least resistance.
Absolutely many would, especially those with deep pockets. The biggest concern I'm hearing from companies adopting AI, for basically any use case, is data leaving their network. Especially (but not only) in the EU.
A judge gave the green light on deportationn just yesterday.
Most languages have that early init problem. C++ allows global constructors, Java has class statics, Rust can also initialize thing globally.

Even C allows library initializers running arbitrary code. It was used to implement that attack against ssh via malicious xz library.

Disabling globals that are not compile-time constants or at least are never initialized unless the application explicitly called things will nicely address that issue. But language designers think that running arbitrary code before main is a must.
Depends on the amount of data really.
these people rather blame "the (blacks, gays, jews, etc)" than learn how to read.

let's see which minority will be responsible for the consequences of the tarifs next months.
The media coverage seems a bit weird to me. The primary source was released 12 hours ago, but when I did a bit of research 4 hours ago I only saw a few reports from dubious Chinese sources like this: https://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/1277768.html

Then about 2 hours ago all major media outlets were covering it.
this is called Identity Politics.. basing your judgement of other adults by their demographic classifications.. Replacing skills-based and merit-based promotion with "balancing" is racist and sexist in a polar opposite way from the historical trajectory. This parent statement is part of the unrepentant position of many in the USA. This position lost at multiple levels in a massive open election in the USA.
I definitely would like to see that. The advantage with Venus is also that the turnaround times would be shorter compared to Jupiter or Saturn.
They acquired the Android company years before the iPhone existed.

It was supposed to be a BlackBerry/Blackjack killer at the time.

And then the iPhone was revealed and Google immediately changed Android’s direction to become a touch OS.
if it is not, what is your interpretation of it then?
> But it's the person that causes the creation of the infringing material that is responsible for the infringement, not the machine or device itself.

That's simply not good enough. This is not merely a machine that can be misused if desired by a bad actor, this is a machine that specializes in infringement. It's a machine which is internally biased, by the nature of how it works, towards infringement, because it is inherently "copying:" It is copying the weighted averages of millions perhaps billions of training images, many of which depict similar things. No, it doesn't explicitly copy one Indiana Jones image or another: It copies a shit ton of Indiana Jones images, mushed together into a "new" image from a technical perspective, but will inherit all the most prominent features from all of those images, and thus: it remains a copy.

And if you want to disagree with this point, it'd be most persuasive then to explain why, if this is not the case, AI images regularly end up infringing on various aspects of various popular artworks, like characters, styles, intellectual properties, when those things are not being requested by the prompt.

> If you ask a human artist for an image of "an archeologist who wears a hat and uses a whip" you're also going to get something extremely similar to Indiana Jones unless you explicitly ask for something else.

No, you aren't, because an artist is a person that doesn't want to suffer legal consequences for drawing something owned by someone else. Unless you specifically commission "Indiana Jones fanart" I in fact, highly doubt you'll get something like him because an artist will want to use this work to promote their work to others, and unless you are driven to exist in the copyright gray area of fan created works, which is inherently legally dicey, you wouldn't do that.
"m68k-unknown-linux-gnu" was merged as a Tier-3 target for Rust, wasn't it? [0]

[0] https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/458
Yeah this is terrible, I remember for creative suite there used to be some weird workaround where you could switch your plan to the cheapest one (I think it was Photoshop+Lightroom) and then cancel, and then it would not charge you for the remaining time. I wonder if that still works.
> businesses don't care too much

Not really so, since the deranged application of an idea of "loss of revenue" decades ago.
I have been working on a quic/webrtc application for a while, webrtc capabilities are severely underrated since everything pairs it with TCP signaling defeating the power of webrtc
It's interesting how quickly I clicked on "make parenting easier". I'm tired boss.
That will miss comments and documentation.
If there is a strategy it is probably dominating the news cycle with this chaotic bullshit, while they navigate towards the real goal in the shadows.
What is that replying to? I was addressing the argument that "well, you stored the work in memory, therefore you infringed copyright". It seems like you agree that that jump doesn't follow, just as I argued?
I fail to see the benefit from the lens of C++23.
> One pattern I've seen in lower functioning teams with lots of conflict is some members being very well spoken, typically more classically trained like a philosophy background, probably a past debate club type kid. "Strong opinions, loosely held" type behavior where bad ideas were passionately argued by the more eloquent & aggressive team member until everyone else was exhausted and just let it run.

> The kind of guys that would steamroll the rest of the team as a bunch of idiots for not agreeing with him, but flip to a charismatic "ah good point" when incontrovertible proof of their idea not being correct was presented. The problem is you can't provide incontrovertible proof in real time in most cases, and lots of managers confuse their passion/certitude for correctness.

The problem is not that incontrovertible proof cannot be provided real time. Yielding evidence from complex, esoteric systems is always difficult and time-consuming.

The problem is the well-spoken people in the above example are not well-listening. Hearing a poorly-worded argument whose conceptual outlines might be worth considering is an important skill. Ignoring an argument because it is not eloquently delivered is hubris.

Because such people do not listen well, they cannot claim to have “Strong opinions, loosely held”. Requiring hard-to-yield evidence before changing one’s mind is “Strong opinions, tightly held”.

In the end, heated arguments are usually an indicator of dysfunction, even in high functioning teams. Teams are usually better off having honest, dispassionate debate.
The world isn't black and white like that. Some people even want to do those things on the side. And some become more than a one man show after some time and without having planned that. Not every one has (or has to have) the kind of extreme passion that you are referring to.
I know of Halobates, they live on top the ocean, not in the ocean. I.e. they have no adaptations to breathe in salt water. There are many other species like this that are restricted to tidal (flies, parasitic wasps, etc.) or costal areas and nowhere else, but again, not under water.
There is no plan. Talk tough, reverse under pressure, rinse repeat. Anyone surprised must not have watched season one which aired in 2019.
Show HN: DSM-5 based panic attack analysis AND AI-companion Elissa
Launched my first app today on PH —“Elissa - My Panic Ally”

Elissa is an AI-companion helping people manage panic & anxiety. AI chat, Panic SOS, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy based logger, mood tracker included.

Paused med school & taught myself dev to help loved ones who suffered alone. Would love your feedback!
Everything looks good on paper but build it first.
Destruction is the goal.
> assuming one even exists

Why would you assume that?

I don't know why people keep expecting Trump to be different than what he has consistently shown us for all these years. There's no subtle plan. There's no long-term plan. He's cranking the levers immediately available to him for the drama, as he has always done.

People around him may have ideas and plans. They can sometimes get him to agree to one of these, but it never lasts long.
Not full exemption. They're still subject to the 20% tariff (instead of the ridiculous 145%) so Trump can save his face.
Yeah, Python at the Speed of Rust if you ignore the unavoidable overhead of still using Python.
Right. I thought it was some term like "polishing the IRS" that I had never heard of. Just wanted to make sure :)
Have a look at GenStage, flow, Broadway, Oban pro in elixir land. But OTP alone can get you pretty far.
> Though, the trend I'm seeing a lot of is greenfield projects just migrating their MCUs to ARM.

That’s what I would expect, too.

The Venn diagram of projects using an old architecture like alpha but also wanting to adopt a new programming language is nearly two separate circles.

The parent comment even included HPPA (PA-RISC) which almost makes me think they’re into either retro computing or they have some arbitrary completionist goal of covering all platforms.
The inauguration donations are pretty common across all parties, I think the Trump coin launching the day prior was the most corrupt.
It is all companies in the categories of phones, computers, and chips.
> Prima donna developers who publicly call managers/teammates stupid in meetings ... (snip) ... telling newer team members to get a new job if they don't like how things are done.

I think the author covers that point to some extent:

> The focus stays on the problem: “This approach might not scale” instead of “Your idea sucks.”

As soon as you deviate from that focus, the discussion becomes toxic.
Netflix Revenue 2012 - $3.5bn
Netflix Revenue 2024 - $39bn

Apparently the market disagrees.
Non dark pattern sites show the total price for the annual subscription and the lower /month discount below.
How will China react to this, I wonder.
I mean, his rich friends made 340 billion in the stock market chaos. So I suspect there is at least a vague plan, but it has nothing to do with anyone but himself and those who support him getting richer. But that's the only plan I think Trump has ever had in his entire life, or will ever have.

Like he's just not that deep. He's an incredibly shallow, inexperienced, dim, incurious old man who has never worked a job in his life, never built anything, never did anything. He arrived on top and his greatest achievement in life was managing to not lose it, in a country where it is specifically very hard to do that.

And hearing his supporters talk about how strong he is is just objectively hilarious. Man looks like 4 steepish flights of stairs would kill him stone dead.
also check out gpt4o image generation. It can fit in up 20 objects with correct texts and it's very good at following instruction, in my experience.
A tiny amount of pressure applied to the “tail” of it shatters the whole thing instantly, that’s one of the coolest things about it.
You are greatly exaggerating the numbers, and Rust and its ecosystem are known for being stable. Are you saying everyone should write their own csv parser? Also it’s highly likely that an existing CSV library would be optimized, unlike whatever you wrote ad-hoc, so your performance argument doesn’t hold.
Immigration judges are "administrative judges" and work for the executive (i.e. Trump), not an independent branch.

It'll be appealed to a Federal court now.
I agree with these. Here are some third party tools that can help with some of the gripes though:

> - No instant search (macOS has had it for how many years now?)
Everything search somehow does instant search across the entire file system. It is the first thing I install when I get a new computer, cannot stress enough how much time this has saved me:
https://www.voidtools.com/

> - No tool to graphically show where my diskspace went; allowing me to find and delete large files

This one takes a while to scan but produces an excellent visualization:
http://www.steffengerlach.de/freeware/ (Scanner)
Would you prefer VCs to have fronted the money to bootstrap it? How is it relevant today if ads are no longer enabling their financial viability? Ads largely finance Google's consumer offerings, not their enterprise offerings. Most enterprise Google customers understand the difference.