skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Garcia's defense argues the opposite as you and claim it is a one year contract with disposition at the discretion of the US. In fact a large portion of their argument relies on this claim as it's their basis as to why the US has meaningful control over his fate.
Flagged. Paints the administration (and thus Elon Musk and other Silicon Valley bigwigs by association) in a bad light.
Or text to speech generation ... but I guess that is coming.
that is why the complex is distinct from the complicated
This trend of:

> Democrats fail to do something

> it's because they universally wanted to but were obstructed.

Doesn't really work in a post-Trump era. They could've done whatever they wanted to, if they were willing to try.
1. Understanding the fundamentals deeply, so that it's "muscle memory". Everyone is trying to race and learn as much as they can. I think they'd get much farther by focusing more on the fundamentals of the technology they use and the whys of that technology.

2. Caring. A lot of people just plain don't care. This might not be their fault. It may be a compensation issue, I don't know, but it's pretty rare, in my experience.
Don’t understand the cynicism either. Is this not way cooler than the latest pre-revenue series F marketing copy slop bot startup?

To me this task looks less like next token prediction language modeling and more like translating a single “word” at a time into English. It’s a pretty tractable problem. The harder parts probably come from all the messiness of hearing and playing sounds underwater.

I would imagine adapting to new vocab would be pretty clunky in an LLM based system. It would be interesting if it were able to add new words in real time.
So, HN has deleted this off the front page after about 20 minutes, and sure, they generally want to avoid "political" stories but the simple fact is that when a "political" story reaches a certain legal of magnitude it becomes the only thing of real importance. This is an issue of seismic importance for the tech world, or at the very least the US tech community, whether HN accepts that or not.
Perhaps. It's an interesting (if very libertarian) perspective. It's somewhat factual but also blowing things out of proportion, exaggerating and with typical right wing "pearl-clutching" while being couched in academic language.
20 ;)

[0](https://quillbot.com/grammar-check)
From OpenAI's announcement:

> Qodo tested GPT‑4.1 head-to-head against Claude Sonnet 3.7 on generating high-quality code reviews from GitHub pull requests. Across 200 real-world pull requests with the same prompts and conditions, they found that GPT‑4.1 produced the better suggestion in 55% of cases. Notably, they found that GPT‑4.1 excels at both precision (knowing when not to make suggestions) and comprehensiveness (providing thorough analysis when warranted).

https://www.qodo.ai/blog/benchmarked-gpt-4-1/
Well presumably the lookup table can have steps you go through (produce this symbol, then go to row 3568), with state as well, so it’s more like a Turing machine than a single-shot table lookup.
Sorry what is the source for this?
I promise the warning page was made from scratch!
Ouch Match – real recovery stories from people who overcame knee injuries
Hi! I wanted to share some news about a new platform OUCH MATCH — one stop destination for people recovering from knee injuries (like ACL, meniscus, etc.) where they can find real stories from others who’ve been through it or share their successful recovery .

Recovery can feel confusing and isolating. We wanted to create a space where people can learn what actually helped others — whether it’s rehab routines, timeframes, setbacks, lifestyle changes,or mental support.

Right now, it’s focused on knee injuries, but the long-term goal is to cover recovery stories from all types of injuries.

We are still early in development — would love your thoughts on the concept, UX, or how to make it more valuable.

Many thanks !
> The government said on Saturday he’s alive.

Not exactly a group known to say anything factual.
There already is socialized medicine provided to native Americans (IHS, if you were not aware).
Out of curiosity, how does your tool manage to account in its reports, for entities that have engaged in keeping a separate set of books as covered under FASAB S-56?

If you are unfamiliar this was passed mostly secretly in 2019 during the whole Kavanaugh confirmation, almost without issue crossing party lines. Its made every SEC required statement effectively worthless for the entities involved in any project or work that touches on national security.

There are at least 7 of the largest companies that make up the majority of the DOW/other indexes that may be covered.
Show HN: I built a tool that make its fast to onboard devs to your codebase
Great pros and cons analysis honestly; I would say though that this is isn't buying into the model of Infisical SSH specifically as much as it is just changing the overall approach from SSH public key authentication to SSH certificate-based authentication which has been available for years; Infisical SSH is more-so there to provide the tooling to more easily implement this approach.

Regarding the point on users generating their own keys, I'd say this would still be possible — You can have an SSH CA sign/issue a certificate for an existing key pair.
KaiPod Learning (YC S21) Is Hiring a PM
>And Google is way past "Don't be Evil" days...

Wonder what prompted the change in L&S ...

I suspect over a period of time caring people realized that the people they care for are a shitty lot, so they become less caring.
They don't disclose parameter counts so it's hard to say exactly how far apart they are in terms of size, but based on the pricing it seems like a pretty wild comparison, with one being an attempt at an ultra-massive SOTA model and one being a model scaled down for efficiency and probably distilled from the big one. The way they're presented as version numbers is business nonsense which obscures a lot about what's going on.
Osprey is entirely asynchronous. It doesn't hold pages at all. If you visit an unsafe website, you might see it for 50-250ms before the connection is stopped.
How does this work out for functions in the middle of the call stack? Can the objects a function creates be mutated by functions they call? Phrased differently, can functions modify their input parameters? If a function returns one of their input parameters (modified or not), does that mean the calling function can no longer mutate it?

Maybe I'm discarding this too readily, but I don't think this idea of "local mutability" has much value -- if an object is mutable, the compiler and runtime has to support mutation and many optimizations are impossible because every object is mutable somewhere during their lifetime (and for objects created in main, they're mutable for the lifetime of the program).
No, I understood that and respect that a lot. I thought of doing that as I had hundreds if not thousands of never to be visited. As an interim, instead of using the browser bookmarks or any online services I just save useful things to my notes depending on my professional context.
I'd wage you have to be pretty brave to go to the US though.
Could any one guess the reason as to why they didn't ship this in the chat UI?
> If you build the first AGI you win capitalism. That's what is at stake here.

Why? If you had a GPT version right now that was even more intelligent than an average human, what exactly would change?

The big assumption is that you could leverage that into an even bigger lead, but this seems questionable to me-- just throwing twice the compute at it is not going to make it twice as clever. Considering recent efforts, throwing more man(?)-hours into self improvement is also highly likely to run into quickly diminishing returns.

Sure, you might get significant market share for services that currently require a human-in-front-of-screen and nothing else, but what prevents your competition from building the exact same thing?
So why then are you suggesting your company is typical?
Interesting link. Worth noting that the pull requests were judged by o3-mini. Further, I'm not sure that 55% vs 45% is a huge difference.
simd doesnt make much sense as a standard feature/library for a general purpose language.
If you're doing simd its because you're doing something particular for a particular machine and you want to leverage platform specific instructions, so thats why intrinsics (or hell, even externally linked blobs written in asm) is the way to go and C supports that just fine.

But sure, if all youre doing is dot products I guess you can write a standard function that will work on most simd platforms, but who cares, use a linalg library instead.
BitChute Exits UK over Online Censorship Laws
What gives is that many of those saying those things to you were arguing in bad faith to waste your time and attention.

Now their team has won and they get to kill all the bad guys in peace.
usually enabling "Search" fixes it sometimes as they fetch the newer methods.
uBlock Origin's filters aren't up-to-date. You can go to PhishTank and try all the recently added websites on a VM. uBlock won't block any of them.
Chat Jams
> The idea that you can somehow promise to limit the activity / speech of other adults with rights makes no sense and seems like a poor effort at an end run to avoid first amendment violation.

He wants them to expel students who protest his administration or causes, and report any who are on study visas to ICE for a couple weeks of "detention" followed by deportation if they're lucky, or to be sent to CECOT if they're not. Schools can do those things, and that's what he wants.

And violations of the law, and even the Constitution, only matter if someone enforces the law.
You probably want concrete around the lifts but otherwise you could use timber.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascent_MKE
That's not an advantage of intrusive data structures then. That's precisely an advantage of non-intrusive data structure : object can be inserted in an arbitrary number of containers
Probably because only the US has the kind of gun violence that you're wondering about. I don't think in Europe, the idea that someone is going to come after you with a gun because you pissed them off generally hits the radar.

Someone may find the question offensive because of that.
Your concerns may be justified. The site says: "This repository is under review for potential modification in compliance with Administration directives."
The memory thing? More resources intensive?
Hmm... US has 330 million. JP has 120 million in the size of california. They have a long way to go.
“Coming decades” is an understatement. It depends on local conditions but douglas fir pines in the PNW take 200-300 years to decay completely, so that’s centuries more of carbon capture as long as we let our forests rewild. Realistically a forest becomes old growth once there are at least three generations of trees in various states of decay. That may decades in warmer climates but much longer in the north.
You can adjust he headline like this: "The Future of Generative AI (Market) Rests On OpenAI", then it would be more precise. Basically - if OAI crashes, then it will take down all competitors, like bowling pins. No one will erase existing NN software from the hard drives of course.
>4.1 Was better in 55% of cases

Um, isn't that just a fancy way of saying it is slightly better

>Score of 6.81 against 6.66

So very slightly better
Towards the end of the article, the author implies it is real when they explain why they made it that way (TL;DR: A bit of fun)
This is true, and they do. I'm replacing Comodo's Valkyrie API with Symantec's Browser Protection API for performance reasons. But, no data is logged, and only the minimum amount of data is sent to each provider.
(author here) I've been pondering this, yeah. I'm currently sharing the I2C bus with a DAC and that's working alright, but the refresh rate issue is enough to make me consider SPI. I know the SPI peripheral supports DMA as well, and the I2C one doesn't (sort of? I know there's "async" transmit now but can't tell if that's really doing DMA)
> I got the impression that linked lists aren't used very often.

I did some cursory research on the software I've been using today and presented the results here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43684121

I think there is a misconception around linked lists mostly stemming from the fact that they're not great for cache locality. Someone presents the idea that linked lists under common circumstances are unintuitively slow and therefore should be considered carefully for performance sensitive applications. A game of Chinese whispers immediately forms around that idea and what comes out the other end is a new idea: that linked lists are bad, shouldn't be used and aren't used. Meanwhile, they continue to be used extensively in system software.
The problem is that internet readers are far, far too prone to classify others as being in bad faith, so in practice, "drawing the line" usually amounts to a provocation. This bias is so strong that I don't think people can be persuaded to draw that line more accurately.

Moreover, the concept of good faith / bad faith refers to intent, and we can't know for sure what someone's intent was. So the whole idea of assessing someone else's good-faith level is doomed from the start.

Fortunately, there is a strategy that does work pretty well: assume good faith, and reply to bad information with correct information and bad arguments with better arguments. If the conversation stops being productive, then stop replying. Let the other person have the last word, if need be—it's no big deal, and in cases where they're particularly wrong, that last word is usually self-refuting.
I regret to inform you that you are the victim of quality control, Sir @kiitos:

1. MCP specifies two transport layers: stdio/stdout + HTTP w/SSE [^1]

2. MCP specifies JSON-RPC as the wire format [^2].

In my opinion, this is a schema on top of a pre-existing RPC protocol, not a new protocol.

I implemented the stdio transport, the JSON-RPC wire format & Tools support of the spec in Modex[^3].

- [^1]: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/concepts/transports

- [^2]: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-03-26

- [^3]: https://github.com/theronic/modex
Nah, this is just time passing. Us early internet users are just getting older and discovering the passage of time.

Ever find a great new restaurant? Small, quirky, but good? Things pick up, it grows, maybe moves to a new location. Everything's shiny and great. It's busy and feels fun to know about? Then over time it becomes less fun. The staff aren't working at some cool new place, but just working the same job over and over and you can tell. The newness wears off, and things start to just wear. A couple years later you reconnect with someone you haven't seen in a while and they recommend the place. You haven't been there forever. You go and it's a ghost of what it was. That wasn't enshitification, just the passing of time.

Enjoy the cool moments/places/songs/movies for what they are, don't expect them to be some sort of constant in life. 'music sucks now, movies suck now, XYZ niche thing fandom loves sucks now'. Nah. It's the same that it's ever been. But time has passed yet you want that moment of discovering XYZ to go for ever because it was so good, but it can't. Time won't allow that.
If you want:

- Hype deflation

- Less VC froth

- Fewer bullshit startups

- More investment in real tech, not magic-show LLM demos

- Open-source and decentralization to win

Then OpenAI collapsing would be a net positive in the long run.
Yes, and the administration has said they in-fact have no control (they very likely do, but evidently don't plan to use it).

It would be very nice indeed if the defense's assertions were treated as true by anyone with power to fix this.
Companies that want to maintain a data moat will work to maintain that moat in the face of any new technology.

But not all data in the world is protected in that way. The use cases they promote are just easy to grasp, although they are misleading due to the reality that those examples are often ones protected by data moats.

I mean, I doubt Facebook is going to create an MCP that allows you to deeply access your social graph in a way that will allow you to bypass whatever tracking they want to do to feed their ad business. But Blender, the open source 3d application, may provide a decent MCP to interact with their application. And Wikipedia might get a few decent MCP integrations to expose their knowledge base for easier integration with LLMs (although less useful I suppose considering every LLM would be trained on that data anyway).

I guess it is just a matter of optimism vs. pessimism, (glass half empty vs. glass half full). MCP won't make data moats disappear, but they may make data that isn't behind a moat easier to work with for LLMs.
My belief is that our inability to make good decisions collectively is what causes inequality to arise. Large groups of people don't have any way of making decisions beyond very simple ones with obvious answers. Because of this the group must give decision-making power to a smaller group, and the rise of inequality begins.

Before we can create an equal society without forcing it in some way, we need to figure out a system of decision-making that doesn't have to centralize power and can produce high quality decisions. Throughout history this has been impossible, but I think now with current technology it could be done if we put enough effort into it. A decision-making process in which anyone can participate, and which somehow makes sure participants have the required knowledge to make good decisions (or gathers all knowledge from participants and can figure out the good, relevant parts of it).
I suppose, but firebase is used in some applications, though of course a lot of them are just during testing, so assuming everyone was not like you they would make profit, but assuming a mix, they would make only a bit of profit, so it would be more like a small side project/nice feature that google provides that makes them a little bit of money.
Despite UK and France Lobying, paraquat usage has been banned from Europe in 2007 (thanks Suede!). However it’s still produce in Europe and sold in countries that we also import food from.
Yeah, I tried the 4o models and they severely mispronounced common words and read numbers incorrectly (eg reading 16000 as 1600)
yes! if the title of the side loaded book is close enough to the original the app will detect which book it is when importing it. if it doesn't find it, i will leave the name of the book as it is and then you can assign a real book to it. do i make myself clear?
Replace/Cancel the talk he had scheduled or forgo the $500k+ in savings and keep him. Not a hard decision.
A Show HN thread 2 years ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35688539
Interesting! That could be good way to boost the speeds here for sure, as I'm still pushing out a full framebuffer out with every update and am not usually updating the whole screen.
I'm not saying this is right or wrong. But, if you're ventured backed, then this strategy is usually at odds with your investors. The reason stock options were used in the past was because you were signaling to everyone (you, your family, your grandma, your early employees, your current investors, your advisors, your future investors, etc.) that you were strapping on to a rocket ship. By paying them more and giving less stock, this means your capital raises don't stretch as far (from a perspective of time). This in turn will be a signal to your investors that you may take the $1M and not the $3B deal (see Google/Yahoo), which they may not like.
The only output I'll believe from this is "So long, and thanks for all the fish!"
Yeah I have done some trips before, max was 8 days with 85-100 miles each day, some decent elevation (max 11k feet in a day, but others around 5-6k) pretty bad weather, mix of paved and gravel. No chance I’m coming anywhere close to Lachlan’s time on GDMBR but I do need to finish in under 40 days.

This guy was using Rockbros bags and rack and I’m wondering if I should swap out my Tailfin for a more durable OMM rack…
Let's turn it around: Do you think the mining guy that does not care about safety will start caring about a safety culture because there is a new safety tool? And if it is mandated by government, will it be implemented in a meaningful way, or just on paper?
NATO acquires AI military system from Palantir
The inner call to make your work matter is, I think, a good one and something that if we had more of then the world would be in a better place. That being said, I think Ecclesiastes has an important message that has at least saved me quite a lot of trouble.

Nothing we're doing is anything more than variations of things already done and even if we're successful then it's only to the benefit of morons.

So work hard but make sure to take the afternoon off every once and a while to surprise your spouse with flowers and a picnic.
Yeah, I definitely do not think it is easy, but this is a thing that has been part of (at least) American culture for awhile but it seems we've been losing it. I personally think it is a big part of American success as we all know there are just things you can see "on the ground floor" that are hard to see from higher up. Hell, we even used to have the show Undercover Boss[0] haha. Obviously it is TV but I think anyone can reason through the truth of this.

I'm still working on how to do this right. But I think it is important that all parties recognize the pushback isn't about "us" but since we're on a team trying to make the best business possible. Part of why I struggle with this is 1) I just generally don't care about authority (maybe a bit too autistic lol) and 2) we're all wrong, so being wrong shouldn't really be seen as that bad of a thing. We're talking about pretty complex problems and we're only human with two eyes that must be in the same place at the same time, so it is pretty obvious that we're going to miss some stuff. It's about being less wrong, and if someone is giving you new information from a perspective you don't usually have access to, you sure want to check that it fits your current working model. If not, you're more wrong by not updating.

There's an information asymmetry here that makes things difficult, but a good manager will always listen to their employees BECAUSE they want to better the business. A good culture will allow "arguing" as everyone should be on the same team. As long as the "arguments" can end on good enough terms like everyone is willing to have a beer together at the end of the day. We get heated with our best friends and partners, right? Confrontation isn't destructive, it /can/ be very constructive. But the culture has to be right. Both management and employees need to be happy to share credit when success is made. This is definitely something even low level employees can do to help cultivate these good cultures. Management can do it by not just encouraging this but also watching to make sure it happens and do their best to make sure that success is properly allocated. Otherwise there's a natural incentive for "bad actors" to oversell their possible contributions. That's how you get "Loud Laborers." I think people think just because you're "a small cog in a giant machine" that this means you can have no impact. But the truth is that every cog is critical to the machine. It's just that the small cogs need to align and the problem is that a bad cog can upset the balance of everything. Success is unstable equilibrium.

[0] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1442553/
For reference, I think a common approximation is one token being 0.75 words.

For a 100 page book, that translates to around 50,000 tokens. For 1 mil+ tokens, we need to be looking at 2000+ page books. That's pretty rare, even for documentation.

It doesn't have to be text-based, though. I could see films and TV shows becoming increasingly important for long-context model training.
interested to see if Agent-to-Agent protocol duplicates the MCP functionality eventually