skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm not. I'm responding to the specific exchange between you and JKCalhoun. They implied that they didn't know of any positive culture from 4chan, and you took a sharp left turn by misusing "positive"—taking a different meaning of it and comparing that against death metal music, rather than engaging with the actual meaning of what JKCalhoun had said.

I was simply helping to clarify the semantic issue at hand. I don't have enough personal knowledge of 4chan to pass judgement on it one way or another.
It's difficult because people are trying to figure out where you obtained this hypothetical watermarked image from (that you can't get a non-watermarked version of) and what you plan on doing with it after besides looking at it yourself, and how this becomes something for sale to "enterprise-level clients".

From their website:

> The features your business needs to eliminate watermarks for good.

> Whether you're a photographer or a social media manager, let our AI handle the cleanup so you can focus on creativity.

They seem to think that this is a need businesses have.
> incredibly long work hours

Absolutely makes a difference. My point is that hard work alone was not enough to make it happen -- "fail fast" was key.
Thanks for sharing that Alex! Definitely love having an AI be the strict reviewer so that the human doesn't have to
I suggest you buy products from vendors who care about the modern WebPKI. I don't think the browser root programs are going to back down on this stuff.
From the linked complaint:

> Notably, within minutes of DOGE personnel creating user accounts in NLRB systems, on multiple occasions someone or something within Russia attempted to login using all of the valid credentials (eg. Usernames/Passwords).

Not great.
Guess that "all aboard the LLM/Copilot train!" way of developing your core product really paid off!
Yes, another case of old school web dev making a comeback. “HTML over the wire” is basically server-rendered templates (php, erb, ejs, jinja), sent asynchronously as structured data and interpreted by React to render the component tree.

What’s being done here isn’t entirely new. Turbo/Hotwire [1], Phoenix LiveView, even Facebook’s old Async XHP explored similar patterns. The twist is using JSX to define the component tree server-side and send it as JSON, so the view model logic and UI live in the same place. Feels new, but super familiar, even going back to CGI days.

[1] https://hotwired.dev
(Submitter here.) I had not seen it. I have been checking the Daily Nous for years as a small team outlet for professional philosophers. I find it strong when academicians and professionals feel they have to interrupt the normal stream of their occupations because of an extraordinary something that calls for a shift in attention...
SSH TOFU is also deeply problematic, which is why cattle fleet operators tend to use certificates and not piecewise SSH keys.
If the client is sophisticated enough to realize that I don't believe it's difficult to prefilter to remove said noise.
They're competitive on perf/watt because they're designed to do one thing. But they're much more expensive than an ASIC, which, if also designed to do one thing would be better than the FPGA.
In my checklist (https://overreacted.io/jsx-over-the-wire/#dans-async-ui-fram...), that would satisfy only (2), (3) if it supports async/await in components, and (4). It would not satisfy (1) or (5) because then you'd have to hydrate the components on the client, which you wouldn't be able to do with Preact if they had server-only logic.
what chunk is transmitted when, is not important technically,
(programatically, it is doable, i do not know how to call that properly)

it is ONLY important when you need to not have people (SWARM) finishing downloading of torrent then closing torrent client app and not sending data chunks to next person.

BUT everyone is saying it is stream and has to be instant showing of picture/video.

so i do not understand why all those people in other comments are caring about state of swarm if we do have thousands people watching and everybody is saying there are big amounts of people watching but still caring about swarm..

(swarm thing is important with normal use case of BitTorrent, irrelevant for streaming)

i understand what they are saying, they do not understand that they are saying nonsense.
Looking at the video, I think there's shenanigans afoot. The anime picture they input as a sample image is more generic anime, but the example output image is clearly Ghibli-esque in the same vein as the 4o image generations.
Purely AI-generated content -- with no human authorship -- is not eligible for US copyright protection. However if a human contributes meaningfully to the final output (editing, selection, arrangement, etc.) it becomes eligible. See Thaler v. Perlmutter (2023).
Right, but that just makes it a failed defense, not a scheme to dupe artists into false confidence. Maybe the result will be similar but I don't think the intent here is a con, it sounds pretty genuine.
People who have better things to do, won't want rtsp
I strongly disagree. That's just how education is done as a matter of pragmatism.

In general it's very very difficult to impart conceptual knowledge to someone else because of the nature of human brains. We don't understand how we understand, so to speak, so we can't directly explain how to understand something to someone else.

We teach through examples because that is the best we can do. You're exposing someone to any idea over and over again until it clicks, but that click is what's important, not the examples. If you could somehow perfectly model how a student's brain works and know the exact combination of words to say and models to draw that would make it instantly click for them, then that's all that would be needed, no procedural mastery. But we don't know how to do that.
Intercepting and exploiting first-contact SSH sessions is a security conference sport. People definitely do it.
Buy American. False Made in USA claims are subject to fines exceeding $40k per violation.
Or available after the fact
A meme you say?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqQSwQLDIK8

As for the excuses:

> they are a small

What does a size of a country have to do with how their cities are designed?

> dense

Same as above, unless you mean city density in which case there's nothing special about Dutch cities.

> flat

Yes, and?

> an oceanic weather

Yeah, it rains all the time and yet they cycle.
On a side note, does anyone know why banks still rely on sms 2fa codes instead of TOTP? Is there some regulatory issue that makes it more difficult?
No, nothing of value. If you ever want to lose faith in the future of humanity search "@grok" on Twitter and look at all the interactions people have with it. Just total infantilism, people needing tl;drs spoon-fed to them, needing summarization and one-word answers because they don't want to read, arguing with it or whining to Musk if they don't get the answer they want to confirm what they already believe.
In a nutshell, yes. From a security perspective, look at Fortinet as an egregious example of just how bad. Palo Alto also has some serious internal issues.
The firing of people is what we don't want in Europe. We like social stability so we don't go off the deep end like other superpowers.
Thank-you. Haven't heard anything new so far. Hope they are doing okay.
"...once the government did take away funding and present its ultimatum—completely outside the process specified in Title VI law—Columbia’s administration quickly agreed to everything asked, to howls of outrage from the left-leaning faculty. Yet despite its total capitulation, the government has continued to hold Columbia’s medical research and other science funding hostage, while inventing a never-ending list of additional demands..."

I missed this. Good call out.
Ask HN: What Accountability Hacks do you use for yourself?
I don't know if there's anything to admit from their public stance on this kind of stuff, and I'm certainly not wanting this account to receive retaliation for whatever I post regarding this - they've mentioned that they do get swarms of downvoting groups on particular topics and have taken steps to un-flag things that fall victim to it. I'm not sure what that mechanism is, or if they've seen it, or maybe it's auto-flagging off certain keywords - giving massive benefit of the doubt as possible. Regardless though I've seen this trend on similar news, I think a lot of my favorites contain flagged submissions that are highly relevant for a site like this.

Particularly the argument "these types of posts don't warrant good discussion and turn into flame wars" or generate too many comments per up-votes, a signal for bad thread quality - this has really none of that. If this remains flagged after a time it is a statement.

If this story is true, this is potentially the biggest breach of all time. It's tremendously relevant and that's why I'm annoyed.
Are you suggesting that the government should not fund research, or that only state-operated universities should get government funding?

Furthermore, none of this has to do with an ideological take on "private universities and public funds". This is about Trump controlling the speech and behavior of every institution he can, through defunding and through blackmail.
Good luck enforcing those on a Chinese drop shipper.
Here's a section for you: https://overreacted.io/jsx-over-the-wire/#php-and-xhp
I don't use X neither. Looks like it won't be around for much longer anyway, except as American Pravda (even though "Truth" Social already exists).
I get what your saying, and I do question the value of suing someone in Russia, or China, but did you actually get a lawyer file an actual real lawsuit in Russia? Again, Russia, probably no really going to work.

There's absolutely no reason why you couldn't drag OpenAI to court... you'd need a ton of money, but you could and if you win, then the rest of the AI companies are going to get very busy adjusting their behaviour.
You are acting as if the world is binary and either the previous status quo was justified or Trump's actions are justified, neither of which have to be the case.
A better phrasing is ‘If you were wrong, how would you know?’. It has the same end state, but positions things as an internal revelation rather than a potential loss of face, so is less likely to trigger a defensive response.
Ok have that argument on it's own and do it right legal, go through the legislature and discuss the appropriateness of public funding for private institution.

The Trump administration is not arguing or even considering that as part of their objectives here.
That last part is where my head was going while reading this piece. If both people are of the mindset that the other should change their mind, which is usually the case, it goes nowhere.

The person most open to having they mind changed is often the least likely to need it changed, as they’ve likely already looked at both side in good faith. That said, they may have a blind spot, or haven’t considered a particular view.
> Hopefully this ends with colleges having their tax exempt status revoked

Harvard was founded to educate America's clergy. If there is a category of non-profits that could hop, skip and jump to religious exemption, it's the Ivy League.
Publishers that want to work with indie studios are already accepting 100s of pitches and choose 0.1% they like. If a big publisher will buy a lot of small indie studios you'll soon see titles in a press like "{PUBLISHERNAME} force developers to live on ramen and work 12 / 6".

Simply because working on very tight budget likely 12/6 is how indie games are made. And to be honest in modern economy having any budget at all is kind a success already. So I'd belive most of small games are built on enthusiasm and founders own money.

Vast majority of "indie" games budgets are in range of $100,000 and $300,000 total. Over that amount there is gap where no one invest except few rich, successful and picky publishers. Getting more funding for a small-scale project is extremely hard so if your game needs more then it's must be AA project for at least $2,000,000+ budget. But AA+ means $40+ price tag, completely different production quality and large team so very few kind of games fit the math.

PS: I co-founder of a small gamedev studio and I know quite a few other people in this industry.

PSS: I'm happy to be wrong though. So if you know how to get game funded I have 4 cool playable prototypes to build into a game, team of 10+ devs and we track record for 3 released titles including one for consoles.
I learned a lot from TLS Mastery by Michael W. Lucas.
How about: every day there is a small but finite probability that you fall into a deep pit, and it may take years before people find you.
I want to cheer but it's also frustrating. It's very counter intuitive that even dev-tools frequently take years to land on config-as-code rather than starting there. The only explanation for this is product people and consulting revenue that's artificially restricting adoption of the approach that must be really obvious to everyone in engineering, right?
I mean, frankly, "tried to burn down a police station" doesn't exactly press my outrage buttons. Like, yes, people should not do that, for a whole bunch of complicated reasons, but it's not the kind of thing I think we need a violent overthrow of the societal order to fix.
At Oxide, we named the company after Rust, but we use TypeScript on the frontend, not Rust. Rust is our default technology choice for most new code, but TypeScript is for frontend code.

Rust on web frontends is just not super mature. You can do things with it, and it's very cool, but TypeScript is a very mature technology at this point, and gives a lot of similar benefits to Rust. And it can live natively in a browser context, without complex bindings.

I don't work on native macOS apps, but I'm assuming it's similar: Objective-C or Swift are expected, so you end up needing to bind to APIs that aren't always natural feeling. I could see why you'd want to do something similar: write your core in Rust, but make the UI stuff be in Swift, and call into it from there.
The government could make loans directly and guarantee purchase prices, but it's also stopped making payments congress committed it to, so you'd be crazy to trust any promises from the administration.
It does not work well for SSH. We just don't care about how badly it works.
Missed opportunity to call it a Rotato instead.
Please elaborate. The Federal government funds various research programs. Are you saying that the Federal government should not pay any universities for research? Or that universities that have an endowment should not be paid for research? Or something else?
Yeah, there is quite a bit of overlap!
I am not up to date on all details, but how exactly is it overreach? It's a good question whether government should give money (9bn but I could be wrong) for research, but lets put that aside for now. (who determines what "research" is this? it could be quantum mechanics, or it could be "gender studies")

Curious as to why do you think this is an overreach.
Line length isn't something I'd want reviewed in a PR. Typically I'd set up a linter with relevant limits and defer to that, ideally using pre-commit testing or directly in my IDE. Line length isn't an AI feature, it's largely a solved problem.
I feel I need this for node....
> Microsoft’s idea of consent is “Yes” and “Ask me again tomorrow”

Not only Microsoft's. I think Google were the first who introduced this crap. Now everybody is using it because users don't matter.

I think the UX of the future is: Please enter your card number and let us take what we want.
Finally the government is run like a business - a magical world outsourcing, capricious decisionmaking, and c-suite self-delusion.

I am so glad we slaughtered the Deep State that made us ... checks notes ... the global hegemon.
> We do transcript, chapter and summary extraction on the server

Yeah, do this server side but let the clients request it after fetching RSS feeds directly.

And you will reduce both bandwidth usage and increase reliability of your app.

There is no reason to transform images at all IMHO
You're comparing a city with a country. Yes, you generally speaking shouldn't need a car if you live in a city.
Tell me more about your seances with tolkien and lewis. Where did you have them? What's their favorite foods these days? Are they well?
Hold on now. For consumers, the only thing that's mattered as far as we're concerned is the fact the US had de minimis, which effectively meant no duties paid on all relevant goods a US consumer might want.

The EU, on the other hand, has made buying goods from the US, for consumers, horrifically expensive, including reducing the value of non-duty paid goods to essentially zero and leaving it up to EU member countries to decide if they then wanted to charge an additional "inspection fee" often more than the value of the goods themselves. Spoiler: those countries did.

So, your point isn't really relevant from a consumer point of view. The EU and its member states have tried every dirty trick in the book to make it as awful as possible to buy anything from the US.
"In fact, it is neither strategic for the university, nor respectful of the donors’ intent. It is neither financially responsible/prudent, nor is it permissible."

Did the donors intend to have the entire university system ground down to the point where the ability to fund the donors' plans is completely gone? Donors funding programs to encourage research in to areas of science the Trump administration wants to outlaw... they should just ... sit on the money? Return the money to donors and say "sorry, 49% of voters decided that your family's wishes are illegal"? You want to fund weather research in to climate change, and set up a legacy endowment with your university. Research in to that is outlawed in 2027. What should the university do now, knowing this sort of thing is coming?

The article was about covid. This is about an actual attack on the essence of what makes the universities attractive to donations in the first place.
I agree with your approach but, as a generally extremely left leaning individual myself, comments solely using "the right" (or any individual group) as the example make it hard to assign to this kind of thought process alone.

Some regular self doubt "what I think are ground truth facts may need to be requisitioned and revalidated and that isn't just true for one specific group to consider" is a core requirement of trying to hold a fact based viewpoint, just as important as any other part of such an approach.
I came to the same sort of conclusion when watching Kitsune, which I think was one person and VEO https://vimeo.com/1047370252

Granted, 5 minutes isn't 1h30 but it's not a million miles away either.
>What’s being done here isn’t entirely new. Turbo/Hotwire [1], Phoenix LiveView, even Facebook’s old Async XHP explored similar patterns.

Right, that's why it's in the post: https://overreacted.io/jsx-over-the-wire/#async-xhp

Likewise with CGI: https://overreacted.io/jsx-over-the-wire/#html-ssi-and-cgi

Agree there's echoes of "old" in "new" but there are also distinct new things too :)
> Hopefully this ends with colleges having their tax exempt status revoked.

Only if we do churches at the same time.
They wouldn't exist in the way they do now. It would be different. They existed before intellectual property. There are other models.

You've been conditioned to believe the current model is the only one that works. I'd argue that this is, in large part, because a bunch of interests who aren't "creators" profit from this current regime.
Also discussed here (but flagged, of course...): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43691142
Hashing is done before storing the secret on the server side. Therefore they still need to communicate regarding the intial secret.
Everyone keeps ignoring supply and demand when talking about the impacts of AI. Let's just assume it really gets so good you can do this and it doesn't suck.

Yes the costs will get so low that there will be almost no barrier to making content but if there is no barrier to making content, the ROI will be massive, and so everyone will be doing it, you can more or less have the exact movie you want in your head on demand, and even if you want a bespoke movie from an artist with great taste and a point of view there will be 10,000 of them every year.
Only on those who buy imports.
I really want to believe it's tongue in cheek because the thought of asking not to be audited in order to save some compute on Splunk queries or whatever is very funny to me.
I agree, and we try, however that is not a currently widely supported feature in the boring industry specific business software/hardware space. Maybe now it will be, so time will tell.
Just a few decades ago US had quotas, how many Jews could study on university. Isaac Asimov could not be medical doctor, and become writer for this reason! Even today Harward is doing everything it can, to have a less Jews, they are not preferred minority!

Please spare me of this selective "antisemitism"!
You cannot both have an algorithm that stops AI and allows humans to listen in the long run.

Eventually encoders/classifiers will get an 'anthropomorphic' loop of human ear capabilities to use as a prefilter and identify when sounds differ from the expected human hearing and identify the noise.

I mean this is what adversarial reinforcement learning is, humans cannot beat AI on this in the end.
Do you have to traverse the syntax tree to determine that?
No one posted any note. Its just bullshit. Imagine believing that from a "news" source who happens to have an axe to grind with the current administration.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/unskilled-labor.asp
> americans back then outside of the car and home had no other large purchases. No computer, no $1k phone on a $1k/yr plan, no big tv. People weren’t even eating out or flying back then when they could afford a family vacation.

Back then cars and homes and essentials were relatively cheap and TVs and flying were expensive.
Today it's flipped.
TVs are cheap,
phones are cheap.
Essentials,
like housing,
are expensive.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/en_VpZtUFcE
> if it is

This is the crux to me.

And more than that is how much of my truth (not absolute truth, if such thing exists, but my point of view) I want to give up to enter a common territory to discuss.
Publishing as we understand the idea came about at a time when physical scarcity was the limiting factor in dissemination of copies of works. That time has passed. We're in a completely different world now. The elevator operators and buggy whip manufacturers of the publishing industry would like things to remain the way they have been.
Previous status quo was absolutely unjustified, therefore brave students protested it, at a great personal risk while being slandered as "antisemites" by individuals like Scott Aaronson.
The administration is only using "anti-semitism" as an excuse because they didn't think of blaming fentanyl first.
Nice, you found Canadian wine and orange juice?
> He and people like him propped up the political weaponisation of "antisemitism" in order to attack legitimate protest

Attacking legitimate protest is fine? Like, the KKK are allowed to legitimately demonstrate. And I'm allowed to say they're terrible. That's speech. That's debate.

> They enabled Trump to do this and now they are trying really hard to differentiate themselves from the fascists

Clubs and departments calling for the eradication of a nation-state is nothing new, we've been drawing lines on maps thousands of miles away since Sykes and Picot and before. People opposing those clubs is nothing new. What is novel is the state getting so involved in suppressing it, at least in post-WWII America.
"Autonomous cultural mechanism" sounds like it should belong in a biology of memetics, or mind-viruses. It's unique enough that you could have coined it.

Problem is innoculation is impossible; only active "treatment" is like repeating a series of phrases or something. Reasoning through a series of affirmations.