skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
He was wrong in that he was wrong. I don't blame him for not being to predict what happened, but the industrial revolution had already begun. He had to have been aware that technology can increase efficiencies, and he didn't account for that properly in his models.
Pixeltable-yolox – YOLOX that works with modern Python
We got sick of fighting with YOLOX's dependency every time we needed to update the integration for a decent object detector demo, so we forked it and fixed the annoying issues.

pip install pixeltable-yolox

Key stuff fixed:

- Works with Python 3.9+

- Compatible with current PyTorch

- No more version mismatches

- Actually runs in Colab without hacks

Will keep the Apache 2.0 license. No architectural changes to the model, just focused on making it usable in production.
The thing about Outer Wilds for me is that it's a game about exploration, but most attempts at exploration are punished (limited time frame, sands suffocating you, "ghost matter" kills...). They stuck with a "hard scifi" control scheme where you control your character in 6dof with inertia, which makes some things unnecessarily hard and did not (IMO) add anything to the game itself. The things you interact with in the world are also annoying to use, like the machines where you need to slide a ball around by locking it with your sight... Just let me press a button already!
What are the most popular games on Steam that focus on interacting with a 4chan-like website?
yep, I was surprised nobody mentioned Bram Cohen's name yet. It was the first thing I thought of. Also see https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/BitTorrent_Live
Supabase's postgres LSP works in a similar way iirc.
Have you tried certbot? Or if you want a turnkey solution, you may try Caddy or Traefik that have their own automated certificate generation utility.
Trump et al. really run a motte-and-bailey argument here. They woo reasonable people who agree that critical industries: food, energy, defense-adjacent, metals, etc. - must have substantial capacity on-shore or at least very near. They then flip to what amounts to massive handouts for his rust belt base, basically saying we should make everything here.

The obvious answer is this:

1. it doesn't matter if our t-shirts are made in Bangladesh.

2. it does matter if our stuff is made in an enemy nation (china).

3. U.S. labor is too expensive to move back to mass manufacturing the way we used to do it, c.f. baumol's cost disease.

4. offshoring and illegal labor have suppressed investment in automation and manufacturing technology for decades, which will be painful to undo.

The sensible outcome of these facts is

1. Focus on moving everything out of china to other cheap countries with reasonable levels of human capital.

2. Focus on re-shoring critical industries.

3. Launch moonshot investments into robotics and automation. Bringing back a big chunk of manufacturing is sustainable; bringing back jobs is not.

4. Invest in large-scale roll-out of SMR energy so we have reliable power for this new industrial build.
If you can't change your mind when presented with new evidence, you _are_ an intellectual toddler.
Question 8 on the form, “check if any part of this transaction is to facilitate a private party transfer,” is what he lied about. I phrased it loosely.
You can check any assumptions about the code. But it's not exactly like using browser's dev tools console. First — you don't have to type things "somewhere else" — you're doing it right where you're writing code. And it can be a file or a scratch buffer — you don't even have to save those experimental bits. Second — because you have things neatly wrapped into symbolic expressions (those pesky parens that non-lispers find so confusing), you don't need any ceremony for setting up the stage.

take this Javascript example:

function addFive(x) { return x + 5; }

or

const addFive = (x) => x + 5;

And its counterpart in Clojurescript:

(defn add-five [x] (+ x 5))

In javascript REPL you can eval the entire thing, but try doing it piecemeal - it makes little sense, i.e., what is (x) or => from js perspective, semantically? While Clojure variant already is a list - a native data-structure, the argument is just a vector - another native thing, etc.

So that infamous code-is-data & data-is-code mantra may not seem like a big deal in a trivial example like this, in practice, it's very nice, it allows you to do things otherwise difficult to achieve, watch this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEt06LLQaBY
and give it a thought, how does one build something like that and how using a Lispy language helps there, while using more traditional PL would make things much more difficult.
Or rather they probably just dumped the project to a fresh git repo since their internal tooling probably handles binblob diffing in VCS.
VSCode itself was a malicious move by Microsoft to capitalize on Atom's success, followed by the acquisition of Github and the beheading of Atom.

VSCode is "open source" with a walled garden of a marketplace. A quick look at how Microsoft is trying to kill competitors like Cursor (within the last week) by squeezing them out of the walled garden is... telling.

These moves by Microsoft are not made in the spirit of open source. It's in the spirit of EEE.
Exactly! That's exactly my point. That is why the geography and the size of the contentinent are mostly irrelevant, and trains don't have to be competitive with flights for trips between terminus stations, because most travel takes place between stations a shorter distance along the lines.
I think op is asking has there been many real case scenarios in practice that pushed for this change?
DNS verification.
Hard agree. Is retrospect I think the model of Delphi, where you must assemble `manually` a `pkg` so you can export to the world should have been used instead.

It also have solved the problem where you ended doing a lot of `public` not because the logic dictated it, but as only way to share across crates.

It should have been all modules (even main.rs with mandatory `lib.rs` or whatever) and `crate` should have been a re-exported interface.
Powell's term ends a year from now and Trump gets to appoint his successor. Trump will then have direct control over monetary policy.
Let's Encrypt dropped support for OCSP. CRL doesn't scale well. Short lived certificate probably are a way to avoid certificate revocation quirks.
Ah, the good old column naming convention from MS Excel. Now there’s an amazing creation that occasionally explodes catastrophically.
Your 90-day snapshot backups will soon become 47-day backups. Take care!
Amcrest. See my post below (or above).
If that were true, we would not have Let's Encrypt and tools which can give us certificates in 30 seconds flat once we prove ownership.

The real reason was Snowden. The jump in HTTPS adoption after the Snowden leaks was a virtual explosion; and set HTTPS as the standard for all new services. From there, it was just the rollout. (https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/05/10-years-after-snowden...)

(Edit because I'm posting too fast, for the reply):

> How do you enjoy being dependent on a 3rd party (even a well intentioned one) for being on the internet?

Everyone is reliant on a 3rd party for the internet. It's called your ISP. They also take complaints and will shut you down if they don't like what you're doing. If you are using an online VPS, you have a second 3rd party, which also takes complaints, can see everything you do, and will also shut you down if they don't like what you're doing; and they have to, because they have an ISP to keep happy themselves. Networks integrating with 3rd party networks is literally the definition of the internet.
The US has great health care. It is marginaly worse than some other examples but nowhere close to amoung the worst. As for what I'd do: I would eliminate the employer contribuition - I hate my insurance but if I go elsewhere I leave behind more than $1000/month and nobody can compete with that - thus I'm stuck with health care that my HR department has choosen for me.

i'm not suggesting enthusiastic math teachers is all we need: lack of enthusism is a sympton of a problem but fixing symptoms isn't enough. Likewise I'm not sure shop class is the answer - but schools are leaving a lot of people out by not having them.

the us has a great school system overall but it needs to be better.
Why memory researchers reject the idea of recovered memories of trauma
"We have no bros and no oligarchs"
> reduce the tax burden on US citizens

Do you consider the tariffs to be a (tax) burden on US citizens?
Lexe – Single Executable for Node
I think the thing to consider is that the right-wing is focusing on the things that are the most likely to produce outrage amongst a certain part of the population when they talk about being woke. They'll hyper focus on one protest gone violent rather than thousands of peaceful gatherings in town squares, for example. They've always been very successful at creating this division through their rhetoric and selective focus.

If you're aware that structural discrimination and social injustice exists, then you already are woke. The expression of it might be different for you -- more MLK than Malcolm X, say -- but that doesn't mean you're not woke. We shouldn't let them muddy things when the goal is helping all beings be awake to reality.
The GP post explicitly mentioned the growth of Chinese research capability that they directly saw. It's no secret that China has explicitly and deliberately invested in ramping up R&D.

Also, requiring absolute proof in a system as vast and complex as R&D at the scale of the US leads to complete paralysis. It's a bit like cutting off your fingers because you want to lose weight.
Sigh.

Unfortunately, your implications are spot on.

We, the people, are our own worst enemies.
There's a tool called "lsyncd" which watches for a file and syncs the changed file to other servers "within seconds".

I use this to sync users between small, experimental cluster nodes.

Some notes I have taken: https://notes.bayindirh.io/notes/System+Administration/Synci...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons ; people could be nicer about their use of public spaces / resources.

Though that also goes towards those posting content. Systems that generate an infinite number of permutations for viewing the same information are a poor design. It can easily lead to even conscientious people discovering that a simple attempt to slowly mirror a website overnight with wget has resulted in some rabbit hole of forum view parameter explosion.
HAMAS is a designated terrorist organization. It is the U.S. government's job to keep out foreigners who overtly do things like support terrorist organizations, do human trafficking, etc.

It's quite simple, IMHO, and not a free speech issue. Americans don't owe entry to everyone who shows up at their borders, nor do they owe them a full suite of rights and legal protections once they're admitted.
> 4chan's design is early web 2.0, doesn't require you create an account, allows (pseudo) anonymous posting, content is mostly unfiltered, unmonetized, free & thought of as ephemeral, etc.

That is hardly unique. There are any number of phpbb (and other) boards that allow mostly the same that were/are/will continue to be the same. The only difference is the clientele and noteriaty, but I'd argue 4chan is basically the same thing as somethingawful is/was in that regard. People act like 4chan was this ground-breaking thing but it was just one of many many similar boards.

Also for 4chan, you'd only go to 4chan to go to 4chan. People went to geocities and xoom and angelfire and all the other old internet things for niche website content from individuals, not because of the site that hosted it. It's like going to a bar to chat vs going to a library to study: going to the bar/4chan is an undeniable part of the culture, but let's not pretend it is anything significantly different amongst a constellation of other chat/forum sites (somethingawful, fark, ebaumsworld, discord, IRC etc etc etc)
Getting a bit ridiculous.
The administration is probably aware of this and doesn't care. A huge portion of his base were rust belt voters who want what are essentially handouts, which trump intends to achieve by forcing the American consumer to pay $30/hour for el cheapo goods that could be made elsewhere and have no tangible security impact.

You're mistaking the rhetoric he uses to sell this idiocy to the rest of the country for a good-faith argument.
For those interested in this stuff, I strongly recommend Strogatz "Nonlinear dynamics and chaos".
It's, funny enough, identical to people who conflate all of old 4chan with /b/. The current most popular boards are video game boards and have been since Covid hit. There's a site called 4stats which charts this, and shows how the end of Trump's presidency spelled the death knell of /pol/ dominating 4chan. Which, by comparison, was four years. It's been five years since then. It's kind of like how the golden age of /b/ was a shade over three years (2004-2007) but all of old 4chan is equated to the memes made in this prehistoric era.
From another post, from Digicert, it looks like that my suspicion is confirmed:

Prior to this proposal by Apple, Google promoted a 90-day maximum lifetime, but they voted in favor of Apple’s proposal almost immediately after the voting period began.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43693900

To be noted that this doesn't just affect certificate generation, but also things like when you have a pool of subcertificates from a given certificate, that will all have to be regenerated and deployed as frequently in cascada, and also, like when you have server or clients or a specific device that validate specific certificates. Their only viable solution would be to accept widely any certificate from one of the big top level "trust" CAs...
I'm effectively lying to the kernel about the environment it's executing in, and trying to convince it that it's running on the kind of hardware it expects, when in reality it's running inside a very different environment.

Since I map guest threads 1:1 to host threads in JS, and architecture-specific code manages the loading/unloading of programs, the exec syscall is exercising these lies in a way that they're not currently equipped to handle.

What I'm currently doing is improving those lies to the point where exec stops noticing they're lies and just starts functioning as expected.
Using your specific example: I consider my mind to be made up on 1+1=2, because I have zero idea what kind of a new information one could bring up to make me consider 1+1 not being equal 2.

I am open to someone making such a point, I just consider the likelihood of that happening being insanely low (given the points I’ve encountered so far on that topic).

All that “i made up my mind” means to me personally (stressing this part, because i know for a fact that it means an absolute “i won’t change my mind on this no matter what evidence you provide” to a lot of people) is “given all prior attempts and the evidence on the topic, I believe it is extremely unlikely you will manage to bring up any new legitimate argument to support your position, but I am open to hearing out what you got.”
I think it's more about revocation not working in practice. So the only solution is a short TTL.
I fully agree with this. Electron is hated here as if it was the source of all evil. When Electron came (and node-webkit as well), there were very limited options to create fully cross-platform apps easily. I tried multiple ways (including Qt) but it was very cumbersome and slow to progress. With Electron not only was I able to create a usefull app quickly, I could reuse almost all the code on web. Ok, it takes space and consume memory inefficiently, but thanks to Electron a lot of useful apps exist that otherwise wouldn't or would be much worse. Today Tauri or something else might be better choice, but hating electron seems really out of place.
> The American Empire never existed, because it never could

This theory doesn't really explain what was going on at tremendous expense in Iraq, Afghanistan or even all those years ago in Vietnam.

If there is a decline, I expect it to be in internal security and the transition from high-trust to low-trust society.
I think that's just a poor UI choice. That seems to be its default position until you vote. Once you've voted for how biased you think the article is, it shows you the "Most Popular Rating" which is currently "Center/Fair".
I remember 8chan had literally one rule: don't violate US law.
Maybe he’s not a fan of vanilla ice cream
We just use certbot on each server. Are you worried about the rate limit? LE rate limits based on the list of domains. So we send the request for the shared domain and the domain for each server instance. That makes each renew request unique per server for the purpose of the rate limit.
Yes, I've dabbled in gtk, wxWidgets and several other systems. All of them are meh.

The big player these days seems to be web-based (Electron and friends), though the JVM stack with a native theme for Win/Mac is certainly usable in an environment where you can rely on Java being around.

I think the best option would be some kind of cross-application client-side HTML etc. renderer that apps could use for their user interaction. We could call it a "browser". That avoids the problem of 10 copies of the whole electron stack for 10 apps.

Years ago, Microsoft had their own version of this called HTA (HTml Application) where you could delegate UI to the built-in browser (IE) and get native-looking controls. Something like that but cross-platfom would be nice, especially as one motivation for this project is that Chrome apps are no longer supported so "Web Server for Chrome" is going away. So the "like electron but most of the overhead is handled by Chrome" option is actively being discontinued.
I really wish encryption and identity weren't so tightly coupled in certificates. If I've issued a certificate, I _always_ care about encryption, but sometimes do not care about identity.

For those times when I only care about encryption, I'm forced to take on the extra burden that caring about identity brings.

Pet peeve.
africa has constantly been exploited by those who offer money with a catch. China is investing a lot but those investments tend to come with a catch they are better off without long term.

it is a hard problem
How much do you think a house costs, vs how much do you think a TV costs?

And perhaps more importantly, do you have any idea what rent currently is costing? As a fraction of median income?

This is an avocado toast argument.
It has more to do with OP who said "45 more months of this nonsense". Even if the current guy dies or is unable to run, there are plenty of other folks willing to carry on down the same path in his stead. 45 months might be optimistic.
Absolutely, but what did that give the United States, a 10-year advantage?

Last time I checked, WWII ended 80 years ago.
Running the first generated version to test, I realized I needed to specify: "Make sure that the client processes messages from the server while it is generating and sending hashes of the source file", because the first implementation would spin on generating the hashes and deadlock because the server end would write messages back to the client that the client wasn't reading and fill up the output buffers, which would fill up the client output buffers once the server stalled. This was obvious just from running it and knowing how all this stuff works (rather than by code review).

Then I started seeing issues with how I had phrased the terminal conditions, the client terminating immediately upon reaching the EOF on input file, and not reading any further server messages. I considered making a 3-way ACK to signal end, but instead changed the design to tell it to keep track of outstanding un-acked packets and only send the EOF/EOFACK when there were no outstanding messages.

The design is that the client generates a bunch of "xxhash64" messages for each block of data, and the server replies to each one with either "ok" (I already have that data) or "send" (send me that data). The "send" is replied to with either "data" (here's the data) or "zero" (the block is entirely NUL).
>How we get that level of prosperity back?

By making everyone poorer. Seriously.

You are competing with your fellow citizens for those things. This was true even back then.

Right now, today, it has never been easier to make a lot of money working. So you need to compete with people in that environment. You need to be able to outbid those people for that beautiful home you want. In an environment of lots of educated and skilled workers getting skilled salaries for doing vary valuable work. That's where the bar is.

We can lower the bar back to blue-collar-high-school-diploma, but then we need to also sacrifice all those high earning college degree jobs.

Not going to happen.
Only after the procedure my ENT told me that if she were to pick a cancer to get it would be this one, and that the experts are trying to rename it from cancer to neoplasm because of its relative benignity. But I hadn't heard that it could actually be a positive. That underlines the mixed blessing of screening tests.
Heh, working with a number of large companies I've seen most of them moving to internally signed certs on everything because of ever shortening expiration times. They'll have public certs on edge devices/load balancers but internal services with have internal CA signed certs with long expire times because of the number of crappy apps that make using certs a pain in the ass.
https://vitess.io/
Hey, thanks again—really appreciate the heads-up! Could you point me to the specific section where you're seeing the fade in on scroll? Also, what browser are you using?

I don't remember adding that feature so it might be a bug
> If you post something on a physical bulletin board, you expect people will come by and read it

Or birds, or public cameras, or people who take photos next to it, or people archiving bulletin boards, or...

If I put stuff in public spaces, I expect anyone and anything to be able to read, access and store it. Basically how I treat this very comment, and everything else I put on the public internet.
But one can argue that the LLM crawlers deny the rest of the public access to your data by consuming all available bandwidth.
"Withholding of removal" is a form of legal status.

They can deport you (if they find a willing third party nation), as it's not a path to permanent resident status, but until they do so, you're allowed to reside and work.

https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/fil...

> As in the case of asylum, a person who is granted withholding of removal is protected from being returned to
his or her home country and receives the right to remain in the United States and work legally. But at the end
of the court process, an immigration judge enters a deportation order and then tells the government they
cannot execute that order. That is, the “removal” to a person’s home country is “withheld.” However, the
government is still allowed to deport that person to a different country if the other country agrees to accept
them.

> Withholding of removal provides a form of protection that is less certain than asylum, leaving its recipients in a
sort of limbo. A person who is granted withholding of removal may never leave the United States without
executing that removal order, cannot petition to bring family members to the United States, and does not gain
a path to citizenship. And unlike asylum, when a family seeks withholding of removal together a judge may
grant protection to the parent while denying it to the children, leading to family separation.
You're too pedantic, there are valid reasons to do so
I was mainly devils'-advocating, up until this guy.

With this guy, I can find no fault. If you watch his 60 Minutes interview, it seems heartfelt and authentic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grj328-hlhA Plus, if he was born Palestinian and is now a Buddhist, that means that he willingly chose to endure the risk of getting killed as an apostate.

Something must be done.