skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In which client and with which LLM are you using it?

I use it in Claude Desktop for the right use case, it's much better than thinking mode.

But, I admit, I haven't tried it in Cursor or with other LLMs yet.
Don't forget about the root system, a large part of a tree is underground, so naturally buried
worms armageddon
The Wizard and His Shell
Planks and beams rot substantially slower than they take to grow if built correctly. My house was cheap labor housing in the 1910's so no particularly fancy practice and only the exposed wood has been partly replaced. I've been told some of the beams were even recycled from Holland's old wooden shipping fleet.
You're not even rallying against petit bourg, let alone the bourg. You're literally complaining about the lumpenproles complaining of their suffering. Unfortunate news: "Well paid" proles are still proles.

If your intent is to further Marxist thought amongst the people on this site, you're missing the mark greatly. Perhaps more study is required.
The rule of law is quickly dissolving in the United States. Far too many Americans seem to be okay with that as long as they personally are not being targeted (yet).

Call your legislators. Go to protests. Speak up. Do not be silent. Quiet acquiescence is what the fascists want you to do.
Detailed paper: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-3881/ad7fe6
> I wonder if it always increases though?

It always increases in an isolated system. That caveat is almost always missing in pop-sci level of discussions about entropy, but it is crucial.

> Eventually there will be enough entropy that any change may cause it to reduce or oscillate?

Assuming that the universe is actually an isolated system, entropy will reach a maximum (it cannot oscillate). It is interesting to speculate, and of course our theories are imperfect and we are certainly missing something. In particular, the relationship between time and entropy is not straightforward. Very roughly: is the entropy a function of time, which we could define otherwise, or is time a consequence of entropy changes?

In the first case, we can suppose that if the universe reaches an entropy maximum we’d be far enough outside the conditions under which our theories work that we’d just have entropy decrease with time (i.e., the rule that entropy increases with time is only valid close to our usual conditions).

But in the second case, it would mean that the universe reached the end of time. It could evolve in any conceivable way (in terms of the fundamental laws of Physics), and the arrow of time would always point to the same moment. "What comes after?" Would be a question just as meaningless as "what came before the Big Bang?"

In any case, there are a lot of assumptions and uncertainty. The story does not do the subject any justice.
More than ever everything on internet is just a fucking ad.

> ARN reports a relationship with Cycle Inspect Pty Ltd. that includes: equity or stocks. ARN has patent ##PCT/AU2022/051284 pending to Cycle Inspect Services Pty Ltd

Which is a company doing "Computer assisted inspection and modelling of fibre-reinforced plastic bicycle frames"

https://ipsearch.ipaustralia.gov.au/patents/2021903430
it's probably the commenting section at the bottom (which also took forever to load in)
I visited for the first time last year and I loved people watching at night in this area. It felt so alive.
> We can agree unions should be stronger, but union jobs in America cannot compete with nonunion much cheaper labor in other countries.

I mean, they can, if you put up trade barriers or introduce capital controls. It's not a coincidence that after capital controls were removed, basically any manufacturing that could, fled America. And I (and my family) in Ireland were massive, massive beneficiaries of this!

Like, you can definitely make the argument that globalisation has benefited the world overall, while being bad for a bunch of people in the developed countries. And it's not a bad argument.

But unfortunately for all of the people who think globalisation is great, the votes of all the people who disagree count just as much as yours, and it looks like they're willing to vote for anyone who even hints at promising to fix this.

> Clinton was running the show in the 90s,

He introduced NAFTA, which made it profitable for much US manufacturing to move to Canada/Mexico. Bush let China into the WTO (or was that Clinton too?).
One of the Year's Biggest Games Is an Indie Drug-Dealing SIM Made by a Solo Dev
I see. I am noticing the main difference is that forward_list manages the lifetime and allocation of nodes and that having a pointer to an object is equivalent to a pointer to the node (could be implemented as a helper).

The layouts look the same?
Your brother learned to read at the age of 4, but learning it at 7 1/2 is also fantastic!
I had to do one of those for some local government lobbyists association in DC. They ended up hiring some undergrad instead.
Lyft is probably lying, and this has something to do with an AI feature they’re developing.
"If you're doing business the same way you were 5 years ago, you're going out of business."

I'd say they were more like Nokia than AT&T.
I feel like its unfair to say every single direct manager doesn't care about their folks. I care about each and every person on my team, I care if they are engaged and if they can do their job. I care if they get sick and give them the time to make sure they feel better. I care about their career and try to help them along. Maybe I'm the minority, but I think that lots of managers of ICs should and do feel this way. As you go up the ladder, i can see that going down as the scope increases, but thats why you have managers, to keep attention to those details. Now i've had directors and stuff that do not care about their managers. I've also had managers that aren't great and don't care.

You are 100% correct though, we are all cogs in the machine. In the end, the people at the top don't care about anything below them if it isn't making them an the shareholders more money. If they do, they are a unicorn and i hope everyone gets to work with someone like that.

When I was laid off from RAX, it was a super emotional time. I had a job where I got to hang out with my friends and good people doing good stuff, and we also did some work (the work we were doing was so enjoyable most of the time, it didn't feel like work). I've never been able to capture that since and it has contributed greatly to my desire to get out of leadership roles.
Imagine I write a contract and empower an AI to execute it. I put $10,000 in a bank account and write, "I'd like a nice car."

I do this of my own free will, at my own hazard. I know I'm playing this game. I have intentionally elected to use a system that will execute without any further intervention or oversight on my part. Verbally, I state that I am confident enough in the writing of my instruction that I feel secure in whatever outcome it may bring.

The system automatically executes and someone has sold me a very nice remote control car.

I sue that person.

Why should I have standing?
If you don't believe the people telling you about additive vs subtractive mixing, ask yourself this: How does a prism separate a rainbow of colors out of white sunlight? Shouldn't the sunlight be brown for that to work?
Yes, the metaproblem is: it has to make money. It turns out that "doing genuinely useful things for end users" almost never makes money. I found this out long ago when I had the experience that booking air travel for optimized cost/convenience was a total pain. I figured software can solve this, so built a ticket search engine that supported the query semantics a human typically wants. Dumb idea because you can't get the data over which to search except from airlines, and airlines know that making it convenient to find low convenient fares makes them less money. So they won't give you the data. In fact the entire problem "finding cheap convenient air fare" is actually there in support of someone else's (the airlines) business model.
That's pretty wild. Is that a German employment law or something specific to your company?
Show HN: Figma widget for analysts to create event tracking plan
When I worked as a product analyst, we used Notion to create event tracking plans.

But it always felt disconnected from the UI — pasting screenshots, trying to explain "when the user clicks this button, we fire event XYZ with these props"... then frontend devs pinging me again, asking what something means.

So I vibe-coded a Figma widget over a weekend.

It lets analysts add structured event tracking specs directly on top of the design — like comments, but for events, with a name, description, and props.

Frontend developers can see exactly what to implement and when to send each event, without digging through docs or spreadsheets.

You can try it for free on Figma Community.

Would love feedback from analysts, PMs, or devs who deal with messy analytics documentation!
> It’s rudimentary, but already more useful to me than Siri!

For me, that is an extremely low barrier to cross.

I find Siri useful for exactly two things at the moment: setting timers and calling people while I am driving.

For these two things it is really useful, but even in these niches, when it comes to calling people, despite it having been around me for years now it insist on stupid things like telling me there is no Theresa in my contacts when I ask it to call Therese.

That said what I really want is a reliable system I can trust with calendar acccess and that is possible to discuss with, ideally voice based.
it was maybe easier to understand when @fieldParentPtr took the type as an argument, but if you look at this:

var x: *T = @fieldParentPtr("node", node_ptr);

@fieldParentPtr knows that its result must have type pointer T; and then the builtin function "looks" inside of T and notices there is a "node" field. Then it can backtrack the pointer of T given the pointer to the node field, since the layout of T is well-defined at compile time.

So you could have a mixed-type linked list, and at the callsite zig can at compile-time back out the parent type. There obviously needs to be outside logic (and an outside mechanism to track) this with branches for each type that you could be putting into the linked list. And yes, this is more than a little bit type-unsafe because of the potential for type erasure.

You could probably pretty trivially write a typesafe wrapper for this, as suggested in one of the comments here.
I’m pretty sure by the time we decode what they’re saying it’ll be “so long, and thanks for all the fish”
> he promises teams of fresh graduates from the technological units not only investment and support in establishing a startup but also "initial revenues of $2 million per year".

Wow this is huge. Ya I have been feeling this for a while now.

This whole product market fit and things like that are Important, but not as important as connections The way I see a lot of deals going down is the customer will buy the product from that founder No matter what the quality is and that is how a lot of them get high initial.

That is why a lot of VC firms exclusively focus on B2B SaaS these days.
Mostly using a macOS machine, and on some occasions Ubuntu Linux.
I understand it's improved, but Emacs was always too slow for me.

Additionally, in my workflow I open my editor across many many terminals, the startup time alone prevented this. With emacsclient it was faster, but I specifically DON'T want to have a window that shows all my other open files.
Sorry for being pedantic, the title sounded like no LLM was being used and therefore was lot more intriguing. It uses Claude.

> cron job which makes a call to the Claude API
Scientists: Protein IL-17 fights infection, acts on the brain, inducing anxiety
The AI autocomplete I use (Jetbrains) stands head-and-shoulders above its non-AI autocomplete, and Jetbrains' autocomplete is already considered best-in-class. Its python support is so good that I still haven't figured out how to get anything even remotely close to it running in VSCode
As some others already posted: There is more to copying data than just moving it. It is about observability. A lot of companies have created their own frameworks.

One example I find useful for a lot of usecases is dagster. You can define resources to encapsulate complexity https://docs.dagster.io/guides/build/external-resources in fact with components build on top of custom DSLs https://docs.dagster.io/guides/labs/components

At Magenta/Telekom we are bulding on https://georgheiler.com/event/magenta-data-architecture-25/ - you can follow along with this template here https://github.com/l-mds/local-data-stack/ you may find these examples useful to understand how to use dagster/graph-based data pipeliens @scale
so, did it work?... anyone knows what is the result of this work?
Notice the top 10 states on your cost of living list are also some of the poorest states.
> It does, but if you've removed the damage they can do, then to the company it's preferable to have more people angry who can't do damage, than less people angry but some of them will do damage.

Eh. That's a bad way of thinking, but one that I think is tempting to software engineers. It's basically taking software security thinking (appropriate for things) and applying it to people in a context where the consequences are almost certainly not that bad. It's also probably downstream of some other bad ways of thinking, that probably make it appear more reasonable than it is.

> It's a sad reality. For some people a "dignified exit" won't do a single thing to lessen the rage they feel that they were wronged. It's a sad situation all around.

You know, you're not required hire those kinds of people in the first place. Hire people who get along with others.
Dude, Marissa Mayer hasn't been at Google for well over a decade. Weird callout.
A supporter of the party of summarily executing housepets is going to have wildly different ideas about compassion than I do.

If you can support Kristi Noem shooting her dog and disappearing people to foreign torture prisons, you can't be trusted to treat my loved ones.

Trump has recently used the word "love" to describe how Nazis treated Jewish prisoners. This is a party that has embraced attacking empathy as sinful. I'd trust a MAGA vet to get livestock to market profitably, maybe, but never with anything or anyone I love.
The checking of phones and their content on the border is an escalation for both diplomats and non diplomats. It is simply not true that this was normal and NOT an escalation.
Bazel is an incredibly productive tool at the right scale. I could not imagine working on a giant monorepo without it.

If a startup is killed by Bazel, it probably wasn't the right tech choice for their scale, and it would be more accurate to say that the startup was killed by bad technical leadership.
> It is a fact of life. It would be more mature to move on rather than blog about how you feel wronged by your former employer.

+1.

While there is an imaginable "victim" viewpoint, it is a job for pay with a clear employment contract that was agreed to before employment start, between the Employee and the Corporation, including local and state and federal laws, permitting EXACTLY THIS type of termination.

Further, corporations can't be seen to Favor one Googler vs another. Especially since there is NO GUARANTEE this Ex-Googler isn't one of those AR-15 toting weirdos who condone violence against their now ex-coworkers .. so allowing them futher access to the (huge) universe that Google owns and controls .. its corporate workings .. even for an additional 5 seconds after termination, can be reasonably seen to be Foolish .. so they would cut ties Immediately.
Code is lol. Oh, sorry, meant to say Code is Law. :)
> We all participate in this hostile culture

You can try to participate less. It's also work, but for some people, it's better than the corporate environment.

Keep your expenses under control. (That alone can be hard to do if you're relatively successful in tech, so I mention it because it's something to really think about.) Network in real life to find projects that have finite durations. Take some time between those projects and use that to both relax and develop new business. Go to a different city for a few days, maybe for an organized meetup or a conference (even if you don't attend) and try to meet people. You're double dipping here. Go sightseeing or something else entertaining, and then try to work a room.

> they really don't care about you. In fact, more likely than not, they detest you.

Hopefully more the former than the latter. You're not getting married. You shouldn't be out to find a new family, and everyone hates that metaphor anyway. You probably will find people you do like, though. Since you're targeting well defined business, you don't have to live with that relationship if it doesn't pan out. You just need to get to your next cycle.

I've found a lot of people that I really do like. Some, I still do business with, and others I just sometimes get together with for dinner or a cocktail. We know we still like each other because there's no longer any money involved.

This is a defensive play also since you aren't all-in on one engagement. You can't get complacent just because you're on a W-2 and it all feels good, as this post illustrates.

I'm aware that this isn't an out-of-the-gate strategy. If you're gainfully employed now, save up. Even if you hate your job, use it to establish a stable position so that you can get out when you want to. Seriously consider what you think are the luxuries in life and whether you actually enjoy them or if you have been convinced that you do for some other purpose, like pleasing others, peacocking, or keeping up with the Joneses.
China Admits It Hacked US Infrastructure
Related paper on receptors: https://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674(25)00279-X

Paper suggesting mood alteration: https://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674(25)00278-8
He also had experience backpacking, so he had experience managing water and preparing for weather, so I would say it was optimistic, but not dangerous (except for the danger of getting killed by a driver.)
Using AWS Bedrock is the choice I've seen made to eliminate this problem.
Because USA is threatening annexation of NATO members and is allying itself with Russia.

So, that is what changed.
Whoever gets to Latin first defines it!
But is there any way to limit the memory? Sometimes I want to run more than one thing on the box. I found that meilisearch doesn't have a "max total memory use" flag
I have an implementation of Quickwit, so I've thought about this.

The latest version is stable and fast enough, that I think this won't be an issue for a while. It's the kind of thing that does what it needs to do, at least for me.

But I totally agree that the project is at risk, given the acquisition.
Indeed! As Witt once said, "if a lion could speak, we would not understand it." (https://iep.utm.edu/wittgens/#H5)
@crote

> Are you allowed to take money from the other tables? Clearly the contract says you can, but surely that can't be what they intended?

If their entire business model is based on giving a service that allows you to store your money in safety without any government dependency, while in reality they allow everyone else to take your money, then they deserve whatever happens to them.
I’m not disagreeing with you on the eventual outcome, but what makes you think Stallman and his cronies ever intended to limit the scope of the Free Software movement to foundational software?

The only limit in scope I’ve heard about is “devices intended for installing software”.
> I would have guessed that any kind of forests have quite limited cap how much carbon it could retain in dead wood

The article says, "We found that a forest that's developing toward old-growth condition is accruing more wood in the stream than is being lost through decomposition" and "The effect will continue in coming decades, Keeton said, because many mature New England forests are only about halfway through their long recovery from 19th- and 20th-century clearing for timber and agriculture".
I would argue that this is not the core reason and just an excuse. If it was about paying "fair share" there would be no annexation threats, no economic attacks, none of the rest.

And it would not required Trump lying about Ukraine war either.
These examples seem to be tools built on this tool - which is cool and all, but it's not the equivalent of "a mail order catalogue you can access through your computer", or "a replacement for a travel agent".

What are the applications at the level of Amazon.com, Expedia, or Hacker News?
> In the "west" currently, you are not allowed to publish anything looking favorably "east" in a serious way on mainstream networks

"Not allowed" by whom? There is a big difference between silencing journalists and a branch of the entertainment industry self-selecting for some current "meta-consensus" (dependent on their target consumers).

Personally, I think calling Putin a dictator is stretching it a bit, but I have come to realize that honest, independent media is an absolutely essential cornerstone of an "actual" democracy: As soon as political leaders can prevent their mistakes from being reported to their voters, the whole thing becomes a farce.

You see a similar facet of this problem in the US, but not because governments have secured media control, but because the media landscape has completeley stratified (with a very strong partisan bias), and a lot of voters are basically never exposed to reporting "from the other side" at all (and are saturated with appropriate "outrage-bait" all day instead).

If you are talking about Russia, then I'd say that highly critical/adversarial reporting in the west is to be expected; this is basically "play imperialist games, win imperialist prices". Just compare WW2 era US messaging/reporting on axis power (before it even got involved itself).

But I'm curious about your perspective. What do you think should the US press say about the "east" that it does not?
If you want to know the future of humanity, just imagine a bot stamping on a human face forever.
exactly! it's really hard to find something that's truly _uniquely_ human...
Post-truth has reached clip-art, too. Don't know if to cry or laugh. :)
I think makers of LLM “chat bots” like the Claude desktop or cursor have a ways to go when it comes to exposing precisely what the LLM is being promoted.

Because yes, for the LLM to find the MCP servers it needs that info on its prompt. And the software is currently hiding how that information is being exposed. Is it prepended to your own message? Does it put it at the start of the entire context? If yes, wouldn’t real-time changes in tool availability invalidate the entire context? So then does it add it to end of the context window instead?

Like nobody really has this dialed in completely. Somebody needs to make a LLM “front end” that is the raw de-tokenized input and output. Don’t even attempt to structure it. Give me the input blob and output blob.

… I dunno. I wish these tools had ways to do more precise context editing. And more visibility. It would help make more informed choices on what to prompt the model with.

/Ramble mode off.

But slightly more serious; what is the token cost for a MCP tool? Like the llm needs its name, a description, parameters… so maybe like 100 tokens max per tool? It’s not a lot but it isn’t nothing either.
This is what I meant, thank you.
I biked with the author from SF to Sacramento — we went up to Marin over GGB, then over the Richmond–San Rafael bridge to the EB
There is a Japanese kid riding across the U.S. and documenting it on YouTube:
https://youtu.be/GcBzfu7u0nw
Flat origami is Turing complete (2023)
Brown and orange are not different colors. For some illogical reason we prefer to think that they are: https://youtu.be/wh4aWZRtTwU