skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is a bad approach. At least if its only that.

In Manhatten this works because there is already a decent public transport, already a culture of waking and an established culture of biking.

You can just force people into better cities with punishing taxes. You actually have make the roads safer, provide alternatives and so on. And this is easier said then done, almost all cities in the US have zoning codes and other laws that make it completely impossible to build decent urban infrastructure. And the traffic standards are literally 100% backwards to providing safety.

In fact, because the traffic standards are so bad that less cars actually kill more people. This is because a lot of traffic slows down vehicle speeds on avg.

So basically, if all you are doing is forcing less people to drive, without doing anything else, you are just gone make the roads unsafer, and not improve the city or the lives of most people.
And some light commentary a few days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43648263 - Apr 2025 (51 comments)
Neitherway
Access to GitHub restricted for (part of) mainland China
In a time where statistical models couldn't understand natural language the click stream from users was their secret sauce.

Today a consumer grade >8b decoder only model does a better job of predicting if some (long) string of text matches a user query than any bespoke algorithm would.

The only reason why encoder only models are better than decoder only models is that you can cache the results against the corpus ahead of time.
No, sorry, I didn’t make myself clear. I said that I disagree with that take. Maybe you are not familiar with it, which is something that was raised by some people (maybe jokingly, I don’t know, but it made the rounds in left-wing social media).

I agree that the left should address young men’s struggles, namely the working class, but maybe not in the same sense you are implying. They are as responsible for their own political choices as anyone else.

[P.S.: Am I not from the US. How could I be a Democrat?]
Not the same thing again.

That comparison would be fair if the generative AI you use is trained exclusively on your own (rightfully acquired) data and work.

Existing generative AIs are feeding on the work of millions of people who did not consent.

That’s a violation of their work and of their rights.

And that should also alert those that expect to use/benefit of their own production out of these generators: why would it be 1/ protectable, 2/ protected at all.

It is no coincidence that these generators makers’ philosophy aligns with an autocrat political project, and some inhuman « masculinity » promoters. It’s all about power and nothing about playing by the rules of a society.
https://mynoise.net/
Bond yields are king
No need to be like that. Yes, of fucking course in a city of millions of people there are still cars. The point here is the relative amount compared to earlier.
I would provide a service to my community instead of sitting in my house coding something the world doesn't really need for a faceless corporation.
Should be required watching for entry to adulthood.
Did you link this implying "this is the plan?"

Cause this talks of a gradual implementation of tariff to avoid scaring the markets, which is as far from what happened as it's possible.
RAG is literally what Google Search is.

Unlike the natural language queries that RAG has to deal with, Google searches are (usually) atomic ideas and encoder-only models have a much easier time with them.
I listened the book "Lucky Loser" (Craig/Buettner) a few months back. It's a well-researched timeline of how the Trump fortune was made, and to be really kind, how monumentally terrible DJT is at business on a fundamental level. The shady deals and repulsive ethics are not exceptions but the status quo. The only reason he's in the situation he's in is because the guy who created Survivor saw an opportunity. Now the whole world is paying the price.

I listened because I thought it would be funny, but the shitty behaviour and unapologetic corruption is just so naked that it actually left me feeling pretty upset for all of the obvious reasons.

I'd say that I don't understand how anyone can be charmed by this con artist, but the truth is that I have simply lost a ton of faith in the "average" person.
Learn the preventable causes of false beliefs - the ones that persist despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Reorient ourselves and society in the ways that deny a foothold for those false beliefs.

> What's stopping you?

I don't know important stuff. I did learn how to shift into a headspace where falsehoods become appealing. It is unnerving. But it doesn't tell me how this works or how to help others who are there.
Neat!

Thanks for sharing your insight and fancy words :)
Samsung is banned in my household. Separately from what you say, every Samsung anything I ever owned was a piece of shit, starting with a certain DVD player back in 2003 whose firmware crapped out exactly one day after the one year warranty.
> (...) but WebTransport also supports unreliable streams and a bunch of other things.

If you take some time to learn about WebTransport, you will eventually notice that if you remove HTTP/3 from if you remove each and every single feature that WebTransport touts as changes/improvements over WebSockets.
It reminds me of Steve Mann's WearComp. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wearable_computer#History
> This will generate another URL, which will present you with your terminal in your browser

> Don't share this with anyone you wouldn't trust

This is on another level. They built a terminal sharing application that connects to their servers. One must truly like to live on the edge to try this at home.
Cars need to be banned not primary because of emissions but because they are just generally bad in every wy. They need lots of space, even if they are not actually there (parking lots), they are unsafe and the slow down every other transport method and all the utility functions as well. Plus they are fucking ugly.

A city is just 10x more beautiful without cars, and the place in the cities where most people actually want to hang out, doesn't have cars.

No idea what 'people mover belts' are. We already have trains in various forms, add bikes and maybe some scooters to that and your done. Plus of course lots of walking.

For garbage transport and cargo, it would actually be nice to use the existing tram lines. Zürich has something like that but its experimental. But it should be more developed. Until then, small electric trucks are a good solution. Most of this can be done overnight when the tram lines aren't used much.
I think GP is suggesting that the idea the GGP encountered an SVG that bricked their iPhone (without being a specifically crafted exploit payload) is an extraordinary claim that would require extraordinary evidence.
Apple will not be making iPhones in the US. Labor costs would be too high, the supply chain for the raw materials and the parts is non existent, etc.

It’s a sop to Trump just like when Cook did the dog and pony show and bragged about making the 10 Mac Pros that they ship in a year in the US.
They're pretty good. It's just that they get uncomfortable to use for long periods of time.
Then explain the flaw.

We have a floating exchange rate. Explain how it gets to your disaster scenario given the flows.

The outcome has to come from the operation of the system doesn't it. So run through it.
I am working on a pitch for an AI startup and need to create a nice looking webpage with the demo. I have very little experience with webdev and I wonder if it is a good idea to build a TUI-like interface, as I am a fan of terminal aesthetics in general. This would much relieve the burden of thinking about design and focus on the content.
Pray tell me what are the dark patterns in WhatsApp. My entire circle uses it purely because it is the best app out there. Signal, iMessage or Google's dozen or so chat apps do not come anywhere close.
I was planning on building a Caddy module for Anubis actually. Is anyone else interested in this?
What Leaders Still Get Wrong About Customer Portfolio Management
This is huge. The 20-30 minute charge is very clearly a bottleneck, despite owners saying its a good opportunity to go into Target and do some shopping.
I initially thought it was related to https://memex.garden/ but it seems not.
Writing production Rust macros with macro_rules
As a TypeScript developer, my answer is to use unconfig [1]. Support for JSON, JavaScript, or best of all, TypeScript.

Or wire up your own utility function with bundle-require [2], another favorite of mine, for loading TS or JS config files.

[1]: https://github.com/antfu-collective/unconfig
[2]: https://github.com/egoist/bundle-require
> Nothing is stopping them from being more permissive

Except for the fact that they don't want to be permissive to keep on being secure.
"then to import things it's necessary to send more unwanted dollars"

We're talking the USA here. Where else are those running 'export-led growth' going to sell their stuff?

Where is the excess Argentinian beef scheduled for the USA going to find a market?

There is no untapped source of demand. Or you'd be selling beef to them already.

So what happens with the beef production glut?

"so you have inflation, so the interest in the mortaje goes up"

Increase in prices doesn't necessarily mean inflation. It's just scarce goods being shared out by the market.

And as we know putting up interest rates doesn't fix inflation. Argentina being the case in point (and they still haven't learned that lesson).
ATSC 3.0 channels (there are some already) are encrypted. So no more free-to-air, no open standards, no more open source viewers. Watch TV using Kodi? VLC? Not anymore.

It's a travesty that this was ever approved.
If you don’t want to deal with a capricious regulatory environment, Europe is not the place you want to go.
There is a third and fourth red flag, is it conscious or not I don’t know.

I am not even speaking of « do the users feel what it is ». Here it is:

If some people are so enthusiastic and ruthless defenders of AI generators that were trained/fed from the work of millions on unconsenting artists…

1/ what do they expect will happen to their own generated production?

2/ what do they expect will happen to their own consent, in that particular matter, or in others matters (as this will have been an additional precedent, a de facto)?

Again, said it elsewhere, there is a power play behind this, that is very related to the brolicharchy pushing for some kind of twisted, « red pilled » (lol) masculinity, and that is related to rape as a culture, not only in sexual matter but in all of them.
> Sure, because they picked a set of features exclusive to Pixels.

No, we don't do that. The security requirements are not exclusive to Pixels. Samsung flagships with an Exynos or MediaTek SoC have nearly every feature listed at https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices. They don't quite have proper updates and quality of implementation is an issue. If Samsung allowed us to properly support their devices, we would likely be supported a few Samsung devices. There are no other devices with a reasonable level of security combined with support for using another OS available for us to support. We've also made sure to keep the required support time at 5 years instead of 7 to allow for non-Pixel devices. Snapdragon still not supporting hardware memory tagging at this point is embarrassing for Qualcomm and it should be expected that it's supported at this point, especially since even MediaTek has it now. The OEM making that and other security features available is also needed.

> Nothing is stopping them from being more permissive about the security features they require.

It would not have our core feature set and comparable protections. It would not protect users from real world adversaries like Cellebrite and NSO in the way that it does right now. Our security requirements exist for a reason and major parts of GrapheneOS are built around hardware-based security features. If the device doesn't have hardware memory tagging, then how can we provide one of our main flagship features?

> I do understand why they chose to stick to Pixels; I think it was a mistake nonetheless.

It's strange that you keep mentioning this in the past tense. We support Pixels because they're currently the only devices providing our security requirements while permitting us to use them. If Samsung started permitting us to support their devices, we could support certain Samsung devices. There aren't currently any other devices meeting our requirements, but there isn't a reason to think that there won't be in the future. Our list of security requirements is a very reasonable list of industry standard features. Android OEMs largely aren't trying to provide reasonably secure devices and are not trying to compete with Pixels and iPhones on security. Samsung is an exception, but quality of implementation isn't as high and they're ruining the end result with the massive non-security changes they make that's massively expanding attack surface and making updates much harder.
Hopefully the stolen iPhone was recent enough that Find My / Activation lock rendered it a paperweight. This is why I'm pro parts pairing even though it creates e-waste.

I know in some places you can get AppleCare with theft protection, but if you're in a safe enough country I'd probably forego the theft protection and just eat the cost. Glad OP had theft protection via credit card.
I recently installed an Apple TV in my parents house so I could watch my favorite shows on Apple TV using Apple TV on the Apple TV while visiting them.

When I told them I was installing an Apple TV, they thought they were getting a TV, not an Apple TV.
Do your living expenses consist entirely of imports, and why would the price of that be going up given there is nowhere else for them to sell their stuff?

Prices go up if there is scarcity and no effective competition for your purchases. Is that is what is going to happen?
Every time I work with XML data, I hate it. Just use JSONC imo.
I suspect it would be a good idea if the US abolished the presidency and moved to a parliamentary system. Turns out that concentrating so much power in a single position is a bad idea.
Using AR glasses instead of computer monitors can prevent nearsightedness (myopia) because the virtual image is several meters away.
Was Bretton Woods in place in 1967? That's a fixed exchange rate system.

What might have happened in 1971 that changed the way thing worked overall?
You're kidding yourself (or you've been misled) if you think there was a chance of anything approaching socialism from a Harris administration. Even granting the benefit of the doubt that "middle-of-the-road socialism" was what she meant by "opportunity economy", there still stands the fact that construction is complex, and takes coordination between interests at scale where destruction is simple and can be done (apparently) unilaterally.

Per Churchill, “To build may have to be the slow and laborious task of years. To destroy can be the thoughtless act of a single day.” .
Galileo. Controlled by the EU, and therefore a better choice than GPS, since the United States is no longer trustworthy.
So firstly if this is the theoretical underpinning the White House should be messaging that instead of what they've been saying. Also I've read that report before (this and some other reports have been referenced in media I have listened to) and I wouldn't say they are following it closely, if this was their plan it's already gone well off the rails laid out here.

Edit: to be more specific it literally talks about the potential pitfalls of unilateral tariffs, suggests imposing them over time, etc. There's a lot of stuff in there the US did so but also a lot that they did not follow (and also there's just stuff that is outside the scope of this fairly short document). I think part of the reason the tariffs caught people so flat footed is even well informed people assumed this would be how they were implemented and got the rug pulled out from under them on "Liberation Day"
Wait, to be clear, this 'dedicated return channel' is just for TVs to broadcast back to the station that they're watching the adverts? I thought ATSC 3.0 was going to rely on IP backhaul for that. Actually broadcasting back seems... impractical at best.

I mean, let's keep in mind, even ATSC 1.0 had really awful reception issues; compared to analog NTSC where there was enough redundancy that you could just tune into a garbage station from way too far away and see something. Now imagine trying to make that already unreliable channel bidirectional. I just really hope all the return channel stuff is optional, because it sure as hell isn't going to work without way more stations broadcasting on more channels, and OOPS you've reinvented LTE.
not seeing icons on Firefox (Linux) either. I do have NerdFonts installed, but I guess that shouldn't be needed for a website.
If you use a proper framework, you don't have to manage the socket lifecycle and it doesn't complicate your server.
This. And the latency of actions, of loading, it abysmal.

I don’t care that it becomes of the network being online or not. Find a way. If the network is slow or off, why should I depend on it to access my own music library navigation of any page, that could feed on cached data, and suggest a refresh, rather than forcing one?

Or are all music player that shit now?
"You were arguing that the same number of dollars will get me the same number of goods and services, which is not true."

In aggregate within a rational competitive framework.

It is true for those that are rational and subject to competition.

Where else are they going to sell their stuff? Why would you agree to pay more?

Your behaviour will change, as will everybody elses - and you're the customer. So you go back to them and say no I won't pay any more. Haggle. Are they going to turn you away?

Why is you agreeing to pay more more important than the other person who decides it is too much and cancels the service?

Changing the goalposts is assuming you, and everybody else, are always a price taker, passively accepting what you are given. That's describing a monopoly/oligopoly scenario.

I'm sure that isn't the case.
Most of small businesses supported Trump.

https://www.barrons.com/articles/small-business-owners-voted...

They are getting exactly what they voted for. I have a hard time feeling any sympathy for anyone who is being hurt by Trump who voted for him.
Request pacing sounds intentionally unabusive.
what is the screen reader story with Graphene? Is talkback supported or it is a victim of the security model?
Or a way to try to preserve ownership of some spectrum. IMO it may follow the same route as HD Radio adoption.
Just a good time to remember that the same guy who thinks tariffs are a good idea is the guy who stood at a podium during Covid next to the world’s leading expert and suggested injecting bleach into Covid patients was a good idea.

And was caught on mic saying he likes to grope women.

I would not say anyone is ‘automatically’ questioning Trump’s character or intelligence.

There is plenty of evidence he has neither.
Apple India Produces $22B of iPhones in Shift from China
Or in New Zealand: Nor way.
Same, while I use it for Beat Saber all the time, after testing virtual desktop and the new native desktop sharing, I quickly abandoned attempts to use it for work.

Not only because of the resolution, but also it’s tiring to have something strapped to your face, and it makes it hard to have a cup of coffee or a snack.
What I don’t understand is why Scott Bessent is going along with these harebrained schemes. He supposedly was the big brain genius who devised the trading scheme that George Soros used to break the pound. Surely he anticipated the outcome of Trump’s plan.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Wednesday
So exactly what “socialist” policies would you have gotten under Kamala?
What do you do if you already wear prescription lenses?
Not shocking considering how much heavy mining industrial pollution has taken place in Utah for the past 120 years.

It's sad because so much prime nature is contaminated.
See https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices for the official list of security requirements. We've gone out of the way to keep them very reasonable to permit non-Pixel devices such as only requiring 5 years of updates rather than 7. We also don't require pKVM for virtualization to permit SoC vendors using their own proprietary hypervisors. It's a very reasonable list of requirements. Samsung has devices like their current generation flagship tablets meeting nearly all the security requirements. The blocker is Samsung not permitting another OS to properly support their devices including crippling security for them. The blocker isn't that there aren't devices providing the security features we need but that those devices don't allow us to support them. We aren't interested in low security devices like the Fairphone without even the basic security features included and with significant delays even for the security patch backports from the beginning.

If Samsung had allowed a non-stock OS to properly support devices like Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ and Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra, we'd have been very interested. They did not allow it. They permanently cripple their devices if you unlock them. People should criticize Samsung for this rather than criticizing us for something we don't control. Companies like Fairphone are not realistically capable of building what we need due to lack of resources so there's little point in people bothering them about it.
How I Spent Saturday Recovering a Passkey or Why Open-Source Software Matters
Problems with Go channels (2016)
You now acknowledge at least that I have read the books?
I will say there is a easily noticeable jump in build quality from a $300 Orient or Seiko to something like a Tudor Black Bay, or even some of the microbrands in the 2-4k range. You can especially feel it by rotating the bezel and feeling the play in either direction.

But after that tier the quality increase to price ratio pretty much drops to zero.
Important… ex-Important

Welcome back dude and don’t screw up your jungian walk through the fire. You got this
I mean namespaces, like Common Lisp namespaces.
Fractions are discriminatory when they happen to one individual or group every time or even just the first time.

See also p95 but the same couple of users always see the p99 time, due to some bug.
Magit: A Git Porcelain Inside Emacs
> From the perspective of an artist, a corporation training an AI image generator in a way that isn't susceptible to moral or legal assault is worse

That's ignoring the fact that an AI image generator trained without infringing on existing works would have way worse quality, because of the reduced amount and quality of the training set.
Top regrets at the end of life, according to a death doula's 1k patients
The world of software is far larger than those two operating systems.
Alternate? That's the origin.
How "private" is graphene?

How much do I gain from switching to it instead of say, remaining on the Stock Android?

Edit: This looks comprehensive — https://staging.grapheneos.org/features
An analysis of recent Mozilla controversies and Firefox shortcomings