skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's a systemic problem.

The people crunching the numbers want to leave open the door to future research. If they ask X and crunch numbers and get answer Y but think it could be explained by Z they'll just leave it at Y and make Z it's own follow up so then can get credit for two rather than one. The people summarizing it for mass market consumption have every incentive to go with the most outrageous interpretations of Y because that's what grabs eyeballs and that's how they get paid.

And this is before you account for all the bad actors who'll willfully make little "oversights" like not correcting for stats across countries because they or their backers or colleagues they're trying to curry favor with have an axe to grind and want to see a particular result.
It's like 30x cheaper though. Probably just distilled 4.5
My personal opinion is leveraging LLMs on a large code base requires skill. How you construct the prompt, and what you keep in context, which model you use, all have a large effect on the output. If you just put it into cursor and throw your hands up, you probably didnt do it right
Possibly related to: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickness_behavior
Data Protection Commission Announces commencement of inquiry into X
> given AI seems like a winner takes all type market

Unfortunately for OpenAI and Softbank, it seems like AI will not be "winner take all", and may actually be quite commoditized. It's as easy as choosing a different model in a dropdown in Cursor or whatever your tool of choice.
The comments on Bluesky are really cool, did you implement it yourself?

I wonder what other things Bluesky has!
Rippling
Have you considered the monetary interactions of the full environment?

For instance the fact that that the only way to do this is through money printing, which non-reserve debt under Basel 3 modified (objective value) qualifies, and which itself creates artificial distortions that self-sustain throughout until something breaks?

This effectively drives inflation forward, while at the same time being in a negative GDP growth trend, which only further exacerbates a stagflationary environment.

Imagine the interest rate exposure risk in terms of an environment of uncontrollable higher interest from the petrodollar withdrawal where all production stalls because tech integration has been going on without anyone rational at the helm to mitigate systemic risk?

There really can be no part where OpenAI will become profitable because the profit is taken from jobs that would normally pay a wage.

A mechanical sieve if you will solely on the factor markets, that absorbs liquidity, creating and sustaining various forms of whipsaw distortions, an economic calculation problem that grows until something breaks.

The price of things generally speaking is the ratio of the amount in circulation to that which is available to the general worker. The less workers capable of using it, and there eventually is a point where a critical stall occurs and people stop transacting in the currency.
With no endorsement of what went on in Gitmo, at least it was mostly people accused of truly terrible crimes.

Isn't the Salvador cohort literally mostly random people?

EDIT: by "random people" I meant the ones deported from the US, not people arrested in El Salvador.
I guess it was seldom used. There are some pricing anomalies all over aws offering.

I recently tried to use their IPAM and was amazed by the outrageous cost.
The government said on Saturday he’s alive.

It’s not worth speculating beyond that. From a purely cynical view, it’s better for the rule of law if he is alive as he can be a test case. If he’s dead, that is likely a different court case that could get assigned to a different more credulous or craven judge, plus burn out some time.
Hi Hacker News,

I’m excited to share that my SaaS project, TinyHead, is now live in its free MVP version. TinyHead is an AI-powered tool designed to help users organize and quickly search through their content — whether it’s saved in Notion, Google Docs, PDFs, web URLs, or even YouTube videos.
You have no idea about Switzerland or Northern Europe. In Denmark and Iceland, layoffs are swift.
People really don't get it. The Frontier Labs' ability to make money right now is irrelevant. If you build the first AGI you win capitalism. That's what is at stake here. That's potentially worth Trillions/Quadrillions(infinite?) money. Everything else is noise.
Are you outside the US by chance? Sudden layoffs like this are the norm here.
Can someone explain to me why we should take Aider's polyglot benchmark seriously?

All the solutions are already available on the internet on which various models are trained, albeit in various ratios.

Any variance could likely be due to the mix of the data.
> Can it give that away? I don't know

That’s the non-delegation doctrine debate, cited in the above comment.
Show HN: Cache Up – Summaries of Hacker News Posts
Hello HN! We’re a small team of three developers—Chintan Acharya [1], Dev Patel [2], and Raj Vora [3]. We’d like to introduce Cache Up, a tool that fetches posts from Hacker News, tags them, and summarizes them in under 150 words. We’ve also built a personalized feature that filters posts based on user-selected interests.

Check it out here: https://cacheup.tech

PS: On our web app [4], you can drag or swipe to see the next post! We are in process of publishing mobile apps as well.

Thanks for your time, and we look forward to hearing your thoughts!

[1]: https://www.thecka.tech/
[2]: https://pateldev.tech/
[3]: https://rajvora.tech/
[4]: https://web.cacheup.tech
The EO was signed in 2009.

The 2009-2011 Congress was Democratically controlled.
There is probably a difference here in a few different market segments. You have the AI tooling companies (foundation models, tooling frameworks, vector dbs, etcs...), AI product companies (Agents for Foo), Companies with existing business investing in AI projects, and also existing tooling/compute companies, especially the hyperscalers.

The AI tooling companies could loose a lot of hype and valuation, why the hyperscalers and companies just building incremental automation using llms/agents continue, albeit with less internal investment. How much would that take down the industry? How many existing tech players have fully bet on AI? Even a company like salesforce that has pivoted their marketing to all AI probably only has a small fraction of their revenue tied to it.
Dopamine modulates long term potentiation and depression, in some complicated way.
> ISTM software engineers

Probably not the International Society of Travel Medicine, what's the abbreviation?
Nobody's rising up unless the economy collapses to a significant degree, at which point everyone will.
That will be moot once Trump suspends habeas corpus.
There is also typesense
That doesn’t really matter if they don’t retain users and continue to project a loss.
The thing is, immigrants as a whole are less likely to commit crime than American citizens. If the administration was actually targeting violent criminals, I don't think there would be such outcry. However, there just aren't enough people like that to move the needle, so the bulk of people getting caught up in this are people who are just living their lives and trying to get by, i.e. soft targets that the governments knows can't put up much of a fight.
Lots of the other models are checkpoint releases, and latest is a pointer to the latest checkpoint. Something being continuously updated is quite different and worth knowing about.
German here. Me and my employer pay 12 (together) for healthcare. I have no clue where the idea of „free“ healthcare came from, but it’s far from free. 20% of your wages is the general rule for healthcare here.

On paper, my employer pays me 72k per year. I net 36k of this after taxes and social insurances are paid.
Yes, it is available in Cursor[1] and Windsurf[2] as well.

[1] https://twitter.com/cursor_ai/status/1911835651810738406

[2] https://twitter.com/windsurf_ai/status/1911833698825286142
I'm sorry, but those are vanity evals
nonpaywall link:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/14/opinion/daniel-kahneman-d...
The post seems to be up now and seems to compare it slightly favorable to Claude 3.7.
Have they really though when normalized against currency inflation? (i.e. QE infinity)
Limiting diversity programs, I vaguely get in a very distant way ... if I accept what I think is a dishonest argument from the administration.

>and limit student protests in exchange for its federal funding

I don't even know what that is supposed to mean / do?

The idea that you can somehow promise to limit the activity / speech of other adults with rights makes no sense and seems like a poor effort at an end run to avoid first amendment violation.
You should have created an obviously fake account called like "Mark Guy" with a photo of an asian woman and you should have posted some nazi stuff. In that case your account would have been completely fine for them.
It puts less obstacles in the way of dealing with hardware than almost any other language for sure.

What's standardized was never as important in C land, at least traditionally, which I guess partly explains why it's trailing so far behind. But the stability of the language is also one of its features.
Seems like 4.1 nano ($0.10) is closer to the replacement and 4.1 mini is a new in-between price
The application of modern LLM technology to animal communication is exciting.
Two high-risk demographics for inadequate medical care. Something I hadn't thought about up until this point, would socialized healthcare improve the situation for natives? I foresee a lot of legal boilerplate and additional acts required to interface with the reservations on a healthcare basis. On top of that, the wealthy reservations already have their own system which is much more equitable than the national one. The reservations that are struggling, where these figures are the worst, are very rural. I'm not aware of any country where rural access to healthcare is "very good". Certainly we'd see some kind of improvement with stronger, more centralized federal support... but would we even reach adequate levels?
The accusation is that they are gang members or terrorists. Unfortunately, looking at the accusation doesn't really change what is going on here.
> Arguably the only place where it has a proven positive impact on productivity is in software development

There are no studies demonstrating this. Having to double check this randomly hallucinating pair programmer AI colleague, is not helping with productivity.
You're totally right, in that: whatever MCP servers your client is configured to know about, have a set of capabilities, each of which have some kind of definition, all of which need to be provided to the LLM, somehow, in order to be usable.

And you're totally right that the LLM is usually general-purpose, so the MCP details aren't trained or baked-in, and need to be provided by the client. And those details probably gonna eat up some tokens for sure. But they don't necessarily need to be included with every request!

Interactions with LLMs aren't stateless request/response, they're session-based. And you generally send over metadata like what we're discussing here, or user-defined preferences/memory, or etc., as part of session initialization. This stuff isn't really part of a "prompt" at least as that concept is commonly understood.
Yes I thought that when reading it, if so he may have been a difficult character to work with and that's one of reasons the crosshairs stopped at him.
Only if you don't know C.

Otherwise is says, do whatever you feel like.
Seems like 1-3 above could be answered/tracked with some plumbing pipeline elbow grease leveraging tools like open source edgartools[1] (just a happy user) or sec-api[2] paid proprietary service.

4 would be a heavier lift because it goes beyond the basic skill set of an average data/junior analyst.

[1] https://github.com/dgunning/edgartools

[2] https://sec-api.io/
Funny experiment however you can change outcome of it just by changing white balance on the camera. I'm not sure if the creator is aware of that the camera in his phone is always choosing the white balance, and that he should setup manual mode and have constant light source for this to compare.
I meant this is actually straight-forward if you've been paying even the remotest of attention.

Chronologically:

GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o, o1-preview/o1-mini, o1/o3-mini/o3-mini-high/o1-pro, gpt-4.5, gpt-4.1

Model iterations, by training paradigm:

SGD pretraining with RLHF: GPT-4 -> turbo -> 4o

SGD pretraining w/ RL on verifiable tasks to improve reasoning ability: o1-preview/o1-mini -> o1/o3-mini/o3-mini-high (technically the same product with a higher reasoning token budget) -> o3/o4-mini (not yet released)

reasoning model with some sort of Monte Carlo Search algorithm on top of reasoning traces: o1-pro

Some sort of training pipeline that does well with sparser data, but doesn't incorporate reasoning (I'm positing here, training and architecture paradigms are not that clear for this generation): gpt-4.5, gpt-4.1 (likely fine-tuned on 4.5)

By performance: hard to tell! Depends on what your task is, just like with humans. There are plenty of benchmarks. Roughly, for me, the top 3 by task are:

Creative Writing: gpt-4.5 -> gpt-4o

Business Comms: o1-pro -> o1 -> o3-mini

Coding: o1-pro -> o3-mini (high) -> o1 -> o3-mini (low) -> o1-mini-preview

Shooting the shit: gpt-4o -> o1

It's not to dismiss that their marketing nomenclature is bad, just to point out that it's not that confusing for people that are actively working with these models have are a reasonable memory of the past two years.
Don't call it child slavery, that sounds terrible! Lets call it espousing pro-early employment views.
I'm a little confused as to the 16-bit game interface shown in the article. Is that just for illustration purposes in the article itself, or is there an actual UI you've built to represent Steven/Steven's world?
Yep. Fascism always needs an enemy. If it succeeds at completing its mass violence against the current enemy it will simply redefine its current allies as enemies. "They'll never come for me" inevitably fails.
What is the support for the idea that AI is a winner takes all market? I don't see any network effects or lock-in in this market. If you built a IDE that queries two different services, I don't think anyone would object or notice. Is the idea that all of those users providing actual user-data makes the next generation better? I haven't seen much evidence for that either, everyone seems to have slowed down and been disappointed with the pace of their improvements.

I do see that OpenAI has a brand recognition that, e.g. Anthropic doesn't have, but what else leads you to think that it is winner take most/all?
There seems to be a fairly large cohort among the HN crowd that does not understand the hold ChatGPT has on the cultural zeitgeist.

No normie in my life ever talks of using Gemini or Llama in their day to day life. Maybe some turbo twitter addict boomies talk about using grok, but that's about it.

Regular people are leveraging chatGPT to pick up the slack that google search enshittification left in their lives. It's a Skype to Zoom shift and lots of people here seem to not really appreciate it. They are too caught up on esoteric benchmark scores to recognize the tectonic plates moving beneath them.
This works for things you are actively interested in, but old Reddit was cool in that random things would pop up with posts from experts related to the topic. You could get exposed to all kinds of interesting stuff outside your normal focus. And for your focus it was amazing. Not just the same 30 regular contributors in the small walled gardens we now inhabit/self curate.

I enjoy making music. I've started commenting on peoples youtube/soundcloud. And I've made a small circle of people to talk with, but it's so far removed from what Reddit used to provide before it became a 'content feed'.
no? it's better on AIME '24, Multilingual MMLU, SWE-bench, Aider’s polyglot, MMMU, ComplexFuncBench

and it ties on a lot of benchmarks
Simply put they are human trash. The kind of people that you keep your kids away from, lest they end up trying to emulate them. They have power because a spectacle makes good entertainment, and much of our society has apparently decided entertainment is more important than competence or morals. And the bonus is that these kind of people are easy to keep in line behind authoritarian orders, because inside they know that they're hollow and that if they stop fronting it is a long way down.
> Jim Barksdale, used to say there’s only two ways to make money in business: One is to bundle; the other is unbundle

https://a16z.com/the-future-of-work-cars-and-the-wisdom-in-s...
Guantanamo: random people accused of being part of Al-Qaeda

El Salvador: random people accused of being part of Tren de Aragua
Oh my bad, I thought you referenced contractors in general. In that case I agree: agreements are to be honored.
Defined as practical, curious problem solvers, I'm aware the word has other interpretations.
As an aside:

> Before we go any further: I hate to ask you to do this, but I need your help — I'm up for this year's Webbys for the best business podcast award. I know it's a pain in the ass, but can you sign up and vote for Better Offline? I have never won an award in my life, so help me win this one.

What does it mean to canvas people to vote for you without any suggestion that you have - actually listened to the podcast?

Goes as far as to undermine the award if there's a suggestion you've received votes from people just because you were good at marketing people to vote for you. Seems to confuse savvy business practice with that of an award for merit.
Not allegedly.

Agents of the government have given multiple sworn statements in court that removing him from the country was both an error and in violation of the law.

I suppose that the solicitor general can say that they perjured themselves. Much more reasonable is that Miller is a lying sack of shit spewing lies on TV.
We've got ourselves a real Einstein over here. Who buys this slop?
"Close our terrible and unnecessary human rights black hole" was, sadly, too far "left" for a bunch of Democrats, and of course Republicans love that kind of stuff, so they weren't going to help.
Co-founder of Infisical here!

You're right in noticing that we're moving beyond secrets management into adjacent related verticals as well, specifically branching out more into the larger identity and access management space; secrets management continues to be the bread and butter of Infisical but the way we see it, it would be super nice in the long run to have one unified control plane over all related aspects spanning secrets management to certificate management, SSH access, and more.

One of the core product philosophies of Infisical has always been to abstract away complexity as much as possible while still giving users the ability to customize the tool.

Whereas Vault might, for example, have you explicitly create SSH certificate authorities and require 12+ steps to configure a working SSH certificate-based authentication model, Infisical SSH makes it so you only have to care about users and hosts that is who has access to what with something like 4 steps and if you want more power out of Infisical then that is always possible to build atop.

Good to know regarding Tailscale SSH!
> We will also begin deprecating GPT‑4.5 Preview in the API, as GPT‑4.1 offers improved or similar performance on many key capabilities at much lower cost and latency.

why would they deprecate when it's the better model? too expensive?
I agree - and I don't think investors will sour. Considering that AI and accelerationism is becoming close to a religion, and that there are many wealthy people who are tied to it, I think that the money will go somewhere. Even if it doesn't go into OpenAI, it'll go into one of the competitors.
Give me a real enterprise use case...If it existed, Google would not be offering their model for free...
This requires the whole `.proto` declaration inline in source a string constant. I'm not holding my breath on "Import non-js content"[1] getting approved, so that means you still have to use another build dependency, or manually keep the .proto files synchronized across multiple sources truth. In that light, it's not clear when this would be a benefit over straight-forward code gen. Cool POC hack though.

[1]: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/42219
I've found this a tractable approach, but sometimes not enough. My escalation pattern with cursor looks like this:

1. Document everything that you're doing and update a core architecture or technical doc that the LLM can read.

2. Update your .cursorrules with specific instructions for .cursor which can grow more specific as you nail down parts of your stack and the patterns you're following. This can be updated (by cursor itself) if you find the same problems recurring.

3. I have pre-commit script which runs some internal scripts. If I find the IDE is STILL making the same mistake after I've documented it and added cursor rules, the nuclear option is to add a script here which verifies the integrity of whatever construct is being violated (e.g. tests go into this folder structure, env variables are consistent between these files, import of this model that the LLMs like is forbidden)

I would add: any time you expect to be working on a particular feature / enhancement / refactor, have the LLM create a temporary document with a description and an implementation plan and work from that.

In addition: I have a specific workflow for resolving testing errors or pre-commit errors which follows the above pattern: Document each failure and work through them one at a time, running the test script and updating the document between runs.

I've established these patterns slowly with usage, but it has improved my experience a lot.
Traditionally that's what most public-facing CEOs and other business leaders have done, keeping their politics to themselves in order to avoid needlessly alienating customers and to maintain business continuity as administrations come and go.

That won't work with Trump. Not if you built your businesses on sectors that he is targeting, ranging from EVs to space exploration and research. Musk had to pick a side. Neutrality was never an option.

Few if any of us, regardless of wealth, have any real "agency" with Trump in office. There's nothing he can't fuck up and no one he can't fuck over. This is not an attempt at justification or absolution, just a simple statement of fact.
Facebook Ads CPC Benchmarks
True, that's probably it.
You're incorrect, this is the normal way that the reddit algorithm functions, it promotes highly-engaging content from niche subreddits.

The top post of all time on r/toledo is about a police officer harassing a woman. It's highly engaging but not overtly political. It has 100x the upvotes of a normal r/toledo post about traffic or what have you.

One of the top posts of all time in r/sanjose is a video of someone trying to jimmy a hotel door open using a hook contraption. Highly engaging, not overtly political.

These were the first two city subreddits I checked. It's literally just how reddit works, highly engaging content bubbles to the top and can reach a much larger audience.
They envy the USB committee.
based on their release cadence, I suspect that o4-mini will compete on price, performance, and context length with the rest of these models.
Nope, not from my experience.

Because in C++ the features are just there right around the corner, they will seep into the code base.

And I don't want even classes, there's too much junk in there that I don't need.
Agreed, this is/should always be the deal basically - "here's a bonus so you stay while we transition" is the only reason many folks stay post aquisition. It should not be revokable, especially last minute.