skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
...in the spirit of "if you're not ashamed of your product you've launched too late"

Here goes:

# Motivation

1. There are tons of tools out there to do technical analysis of a single game

2. There are also tools out there to explain Stockfish terms in Human language

3. While those helps to highlight mistakes you've made, learning from them requires conscious effort to digest and retro on why you're making the same mistake

# Approach

1. Instead of analyzing and walking through a single game with you, I analyze past 5 games to identify the most damaging recurring habit.

2. Instead of "what you did wrong", I try to uncover "why you did what you did"

3. This opens the door for further personalized coaching - think lessons on your biggest weakness, identifying your knowledge gaps, and so on.

# Where I am

1. The core app is ready from end-to-end

2. However, the analysis engine requires much more work. The advice it gave are too surface-level, and the move explanations does not make sense sometime.

3. The categorizing of bad moves is not done yet as well. This will improve the analysis engine's output, while providing an avenue for me to serve personalized lessons to the users

# What I ask for

1. If you're a chess player, please give my app a try! Sign in, click on your recent game, let the analysis run while you play some puzzles, and give me feedback on the results you get
The watch with the most complications is any $200 WearOS. You will need to have spent over $1,000,000 on their other watches before they will talk to you about a price for this one; practicality is not a factor to consider.
Good cover: publicly release a rumor via a random tiny outlet (along with a flurry of other rumors). Then if questioned, just say you heard it there.
I expected an article about AWS configuration mistake.
If I am not mistaken, Trump said earlier that it's a great time to buy. Isn't there a chance that someone acted on that, seeing it as a hint?
I agree that merging the technology division from the ministry of economic affairs (BMWK) to the new research ministry is a good step as both ministries have been large providers of funding. The BMBF funds DFG, as well as the large science organizations in Germany (Fhg, Mpg, ...), the BMWK has funded research which is closer to applications, of course looking to enable economic activity.
I'm unsure why the ministry gets a special focus on aerospace, this topic is being worked on by the DLR, funded by BMBF.
I'm also not yet sure what to think about splitting education and research. It goes against the Humboldtian Ideal, especially in the universitys both topics are connected. On the other hand, it might enable the ministries to be more focused and do reforms that don't depend on each other to be performed more quickly.
The research ministry will go to CSU, the bavarian sister party of CDU. While it may not be very popular amongst many Germans, because CSU is seen as conservative and individual CSU politicians are not famous science policymakers, Bavaria is a successful science hub. Munich is home to international leading institutions (TUM, MPG, FhG). Bavaria is also a hub for aerospace with Aibus and MTU and startups like Isar Aerospace and Rocket Factory Augsburg. Maybe repeating what bavarian policymakers have done regionally to the whole of Germany will be good.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Plains_Shelterbelt

It's not a wall, but similar idea
> “Go back to the fascist-owned site where they enjoy supporting AI-generated art like your brand does,” wrote Evlyn Moreau.

Yeah this is why Bluesky will never be a serious and widely used social platform. It's the same sort of cesspool as the right-wing alternatives that popped up a few years back, just more self-righteous.
That assumes that there is a fixed amount of effort and resources to be split between the two things—that there is always opportunity cost.

When it comes to community efforts, it’s rarely the case that all things have opportunity cost—people who contribute effort for X would not have necessarily done so for Y.

The Fedora Project is of course not a purely community effort, so I don’t know exactly how that applies here. But just wanted to point out that prioritization and opportunity cost don’t always work like you suggested.
Is it only for U.S.?
That may be the very long run. Taking it strictly, Russia never had real democracy. And they are trying hard to export that model.
> And it's bullshit that you can reliably make money of such low probability options. Even if you do, you never put $2.5 million on something with a huge probability of ending in a complete loss, these deep out of the money options are essentially lottery tickets.

Nassim Taleb: "I was effectively short volatility. [...] I would have been harmed by small movements. I was set up to be harmed by small movement and gain if the move continues to something very large." [1]

He also described in one of his books that this strategy works because on most days you will lose money, and most people psychologically don't like that. But you have to ignore that and keep betting until you suddenly make a lot of money.

In case you don't know Taleb and would like to point out that he probably is a fraud, please note that his books and articles have been cited 39946 times according to Google Scholar. See also his Wikipedia [2]. Although I am aware that these are all popularity-based metrics, I unfortunately don't have a better metric available. I invite you to read his books for yourself and make your own decision on his credibility.

> I do buy slightly OTM options and it's barely profitable and even so I think mostly out of pure luck. No way would someone have done this trade without inside info.

Okay if the discussion is whether this particular trade was unlikely I can agree, but your "No way" makes no sense to me.

[1]: https://youtu.be/pavjXIkARS4

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nassim_Nicholas_Taleb
You are right IMHO. Java 24 introduces a much shorter "hello world" experience with:
- no class déclaration
- no void, static, public statements
- no System.out

Hopefully teachers noticed...
Securing Vibe Coded Applications Using Cloudflare Access
Gnome STF 2024 Project Report
In many fields of study, the money that goes into academic research is essentially more of high-level-talent education expense, so that local companies have pools of PhDs to hire from, rather than needing to produce a invention that will be commercialized.

E.g. if you look at PhD graduates only one in a few hundred (even in STEM fields) will end up on a path that commercializes their research, with most of the other ones moving into industry and likely not working on a directly related subject to their thesis. That's not necessarily a bad thing.
> Rather, Rubio wrote Khalil could be expelled for his beliefs. He said that while Khalil’s activities were “otherwise lawful,” letting him remain in the country would undermine “U.S. policy to combat anti-Semitism around the world and in the United States, in addition to efforts to protect Jewish students from harassment and violence in the United States.”

The way I read that, it's even more dangerous than it looked at first.

I'm from France and so we have the whole hate speech limitation to freedom of speech, that I agree with, it works but has to be well defined and limited to specifical type of things.

What the US gov is arguing here if I'm not mistaken, is that if the US gov wants to go in direction X, anyone arguing for another direction can now be deported even if everything they do and say is technically legal to. You simply have to apply that thinking to anything that isn't as polarized as israel/palestine to see how dangerous of a point of view it is. If the judge don't stop that, I don't see how that can lead to anything other than political persecution of the opposition.
> These sort of trades happy fairly regularly

I think the post established that this volume or size of spike is unique before any market-shifting news event coming out of the government in recent decades. The "sort" of transaction is irrelevant except that it's risky and thus relatively low volume normally.
Chinese ones are down to $100-$300
From datastar's docs:

> Backend Setup

> Data star uses Server-Sent Events (SSE) to stream zero or more events from the web server to the browser. There’s no special backend plumbing required to use SSE, just some syntax. Fortunately, SSE is straightforward and provides us with some advantages.

As a django developer, this is very far from true. With htmx i get almost no backend changes (mainly in template code), where datastar would require me to rewrite it and may not be possible to implement at all.
But the real test will be follow-through. Big promises like "world's first fusion reactor" and wooing global talent sound great, but without a clear budget or streamlined bureaucracy, it risks becoming just another shiny headline
I realise that, but it's just weird. Technically the majority of the complications wouldn't even need to work, because... Who'd notice?

Seems a bit soul crushing to be working on a complication that no one would ever use.
As someone who just rolled credits on Blue Prince after 20 hours or so, I can definitely confirm that there’s much much more to the post-game content than a skinner box. It’s much more like a mega puzzle hunt[1] with an RNGish roguelike wrapper.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puzzle_hunt
In France a local magazine for Linux enthusiasts has its cover on "Java as a language for scripting". Things are moving.
Ehh, I’ve got not particular stake in this conflict so it’s really interesting to see how each side is using propaganda and how obvious the propaganda is when you’re not emotionally invested.

Each side is using different tactics to fit the strength of their positions and how well various messages resonate. “They are the same anyway” is useful for a side who wants people to be inactive, it’s not some universal benefit to both parties. Instead each side wants different people to be engaged vs apathetic, which hardly unusual.
And in a way, it is...
Who cares what happened in 2005? This is so rare nowadays, I've only really seen it on websites that are constructing the file as they go, such as the Github zip download feature.
In my experience it generally generally doesn't, and instead revels in the prestige of past successes. Titles and self mythology seem to be more valued than achievement and performance.

It's a sad frustration, as there is so much potential here.
I noticed the same in Gemini. It would refuse to answer mundane questions that none but the most 'enlightened' could find an offensive twist to.

This makes it rather unusable as a catch all goto resource, sadly. People are curious by nature. Refusing to answer their questions doesn't squash that, it leads them to potentially less trustworthy sources.
We successfully stopped paying for a collection of Adobe products that were for a student license last year. We randomly were charged again in January and February of this year and when I called they couldn't find any records of charges. They recommended contesting the charges on the card and we've not been charged since. Still, crazy that they couldn't even verify they charged my card.
Fake images that fooled the world
> You shouldn't spend your own effort; you should make it clear that you're open to users of such systems contributing.

In practice you can't really draw a line between those two things.

I don't know the end result, but I remember a discussion of how implementing parts of Git in Rust would be a problem because NonStop, a currently supported platform, has no Rust support. Of course the sane response would be "screw NonStop then", but having accepted contributions to make NonStop a supported platform that isn't an easy path to take.
being open, honest and as a consequence sometimes vulnerable in conversations -1 to 1 or not- without overly filtering myself to stay appropriate or to protect my ego or image has brought me to having a number of close friendship that I would not have thought possible.

Those people that I now consider my family made me a better person and I would even argue made me into an adult.

I would simplify this in 1 don't be afraid to ask random questions 2 be sincerely interested in knowing about the other person's answer

I find this easier to do when the people are evidently interesting, but more often than not people are interesting after I exercise some curiosity about them.
I hope this will help:

https://www.reddit.com/r/RooCode/comments/1jn372q/roocode_vs...
Sounds like rocket science to me /s
>this Vacheron-Constantin will likely be around 200 years from now

I’m interested to hear more. Typically things that are “most complicated” and lost lasting don’t go hand-in-hand.
But I can buy an Apple Watch Ultra every year for the next 200 years for less.
Machine code is generally much safer than C - e.g. it usually lacks undefined behaviour. If you're unsure about how a given piece of machine code behaves, it's usually sufficient to test it empirically.
Those particular aspects are only good for Americans though. That those two things are ending is good for basically everybody else, from Brazilians, Chinese and Canadians to Frenchmen.
> So a lot of people placed bets accordingly

But why not earlier in the day? Why this unique volume spike then? The one $2.5M is just a sample trade, part of a historic spike.

No one's jumping to conclusions, but it should trigger an investigation.
To be fair though, once they do get through all those layers, the end result is often incredibly well-structured and precise
Amca
First, there are two parties here that could prove something. Meta itself, or the Israeli government.

Second, you write:
> [...] their choice not to use this data to defend themselves (i.e. by not showing that the posts were in fact harmful or inciting violence, etc) lends credence to the allegations.

This article is from yesterday. I don't think it's fair to call not responding a "choice", surely you would expect it to take some time to actually respond. I might have missed it in the article, but did they reach out to the Israeli government or to Meta to ask for a response (as is normal journalistic practice)?

Third, it's possible that some of the material is things that cannot be publicized. I have no idea if this is the case (and I personally doubt it's the majority of takedown requests), but if, for example, some of the requests were to remove e.g. images of abused Israeli hostages, bodies, etc, this might be material that they won't release, because the whole idea is to stop spread of such images. Of course, they can still describe the purpose of the various takedown requests.
No write-up yet - Cursor iterates so fast that any guide would be outdated in a few weeks.

My tips:

- Check out the Cursor docs. They're concise - read through them to understand the features and model/context behavior

- It's basically all chat now. Chat has manual mode (previously edit mode), ask mode, and agent mode

- For one-off file changes, use manual mode. Just tell it what to do, and it shows changes as diffs you can accept/reject

- Agent mode is similar but the model can use tools to read files not in context (plus some other stuff like run commands and search through files). It works in a loop until the task is complete - reading files, editing them, fixing lint errors, reading more files, etc.

- For agent mode, Claude Sonnet works best. Other models sometimes fail to use tools correctly or just stop mid-task

- Context is critical. Works best when you provide all necessary context, or at least file names/directory trees in agent mode

- Biggest issue is context cutting. Cursor truncates files and doesn't give the LLM all the code you think it does. Even in max mode, the read file tool only ingests up to 750 lines per file (though I think actively adding files to context lets it read more in max mode). Sometimes copy & paste the file contents into the chat prevents truncating.

- This is why I use max mode for almost anything beyond simple small file edits
Compilers already warn when they detect _unconditional_ undefined behavior. They just don't warn on _conditional_ undefined behavior because doing so would introduce far too many warnings.

Exploiting undefined behavior for optimization only requires local analysis, detecting whether that undefined behavior arises (either unconditionally or at all) requires global analysis. To put it differentially: The compiler often simply doesn't know whether the undefined behavior arises, it only knows that the optimization it introduces is valid anyway.
it's the other way round, the military maintains the world order, the currency is used as reserve, and they get to provide services that nobody else can provide while they're top dog. they are not on a trajectory to remain top dog for very long.
Same here. I've seen some articles and LLM benchmarks that Gemini 2.5 Pro is better than Claude 3.7 on coding, but base on my recent experience of solving code problems with two products, Claude still gave me better answer, Gemini response are more detail and well structured, but less accurate.
You should visit this museum :
https://www.patek.com/en/company/patek-philippe-museum/the-m...

Since mechanical watches are, by design, open source, there will always be a technician interested in keeping them going.
> If your HTTP server provides and supports the appropriate headers and you’re serving supported file types, then it absolutely is true.

No. When you play a file in the browser with a video tag. It requests the file. It doesn’t ask for a range. It does use the range if you seek it, or you write the JavaScript to fetch based on a range. That’s why if you press play and pause it buffers the whole video. Only if you write the code yourself can you partially buffer a while like YouTube does.
You can learn it here:

https://www.zeng.dev/post/2023-http-range-and-play-mp4-in-br...

You can also watch it happen - the Chrome developer tools network tab will show you the traffic that goes to and from the web browser to the server and you can see this process in action.
The poors. It's always the poors
Boltz-1
There's nothing equivalent from the other direction.

- extrovert

(/s ;))
So, 199 Apple watches Ultra in landfills 200 years from now. Congrats.
Bold to assume there are going to be elections.

All it needs is some kind of emergency, genuine, imaginary or self-inflicted, and ‘Oh no, we can’t possibly hold elections until our time of national crisis is over.’
These are special, collectors items and pieces of art. Of course there is no "need" for all these complications, but it isn't the point.
Paid for and owned by Denmark :)
Everyone else, indirectly. So other investors who weren’t in on it, pension funds, John Doe in his retirement home.
The rough numbers I can find are that the acid cloud layer is ~75km thick, which seems awfully long for any kind of tether that'll have to support its own weight. With the low pressure (~0.1 ATM) it'd also need to be a rather big balloon.

Further down, the ~100m/s (~220 mph) winds on the tether would likely try to drag everything sideways, scraping any probe across the landscape.
In what way is this a conspiracy theory or guilt by association? I don't think it is. (Except maybe the statement that he's an Israel citizen, though I think in this context it's a legit statement to make.)

The parent post explicitly makes two separate statements - 1. that he's an Israeli citizen, and 2. that he has questionable morals. I don't necessarily agree with the second statement, but it's explicitly not saying he's immoral because he's Israeli (guilt by association).
As a foreigner I cannot comment on this, else I will be rejected at the airport by the ICE.

That's called freedom my friends.
Yeah, that whole "annual plan billed monthly" thing feels intentionally shady
Function pointers can’t close over variables.
That was the question, what would you use FP for?
I can replicate your weather one! I think it's taking "this week" extremely literally and the week ends on Saturday. Asking for "this weekend" gives Saturday and Sunday. Asking for the next few days gives 3 days out, etc .

Definitely not addressing the spirit of the request.
Too later for an edit, but: The point of this whole scheme is trading OpEx for (on the books) CapEx.
Thanks.

- Load balancing is easier because your connection is stateless. You don't have to connect to the same server when you reconnect. Your up traffic doesn't have to go to the same server as your down traffic. Websocket tend to come with a lot of connection context. With SSE you can easily kill nodes, and clients will reconnect to other nodes automatically.

- The compression is entirely optional. So when you don't need it don't use it. What's great about it though is it's built into the browser so you're not having to ship it to the client first.

- The connection limit of 6 is only applies to http1.1 not http2/3. If you are using SSE you'll want http2/3. But, generally you want http2/3 from your proxy/server to the browser anyway as it has a lot of performance/latency benefits (you'll want it for multiplexing your connection anyway).

- In my experience CPU/memory usage is lower than websockets. Obviously, some languages make them more ergonomic to use virtual/green threads (go, java, clojure). But, a decent async implementation can scale well too.

Honestly, and this is just an opinion, no I can't see when I would ever want to use websockets. Their reconnect mechanisms are just not reliable enough and their operational complexity isn't worth it. For me at least it's SSE or a proper gaming net code protocol over UDP. If your browser game works with websockets it will work with SSE.
That makes sense. An FTE costs 2x as much as a contractor to the government and the latter can be fired. I’m glad it is this way. Even DOGE is temporary.
The people holding the ETF and selling the option. If they had not sold the option, they would have benefited from the value rising, now they instead got (collectively) $2.5M.

If the price had stayed flat or dropped, they would of course still have the $2.5M.

The precision makes it look a lot like a crime, as trading on information that's not publicly available is illegal.
Powerful programming: BBC-controlled electric meters are coming to an end
I agree with the last two paras, with the following addendum. I'm also pro-Israeli people, but I find their leadership (and the settlers) the same as Hamas. No different.

As for the first para, I have very close friends who have been harassed for expressing support for plight. If you are a university student in the US today and said exactly what I have said, you can be found guilty as a terrorist-sympathizer. I have been downvoted to hell on reddit and elsewhere for putting it as mildly as I did here.
I thought it was a well written and entertaining review. While I’m probably not going to buy the game, I think what the author wrote, and this discussion here is important for discovering games I might be interested in.
2005 is basically the dark ages of the web. It’s pre Ajax and ie6 was the dominant browser. Using this as an argument is like saying apps aren’t suitable because the iPhone didn’t have an App Store until 2008.

> It’s not true because throwing a video file as a source on video tag has no information about the file being requested until the headers are pushed down.

And yet, if you stick a web server in front of a video and load it in chrome, you’ll see just that happening.
"Unreliable" is a bit harsh - the problem arises imho not from the websocket ping itself, but from the fact that client-side _and_ server-side need to support the ping/pong frames.
Doesn't that mean he was long volatility?

Taleb's point seems more to be that he saw a mispricing and traded on it one day, rather than anything profound regarding option pricing, unless I am missing something. Anyway, it has little to do with what's being said in the article.
> There is no massive corporation pushing Erlang either directly or indirectly through success.

Isn't there this "small" company that has a chat app that is using erlang :P