skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> It's also not wildly overvalued, purely on a forward PE basis.*

Once you start approaching a critical mass of sales, it's very difficult to keep growing it. Nvidia is being valued as though they'll reach a trillion dollars worth of sales per year. So nearly 10x growth.

You need to make a lot of assumptions to explain how they'll reach that, versus a ton of risk.

Risk #1: arbitrage principle aka. wherever there's profit to be made other players will move in. AMD has AI chips that are doing quite well, Amazon and Google both have their own AI chips, Apple has their own AI chips... IMO it's far more likely that we'll see commodification of AI chips than that the whole industry will do nothing and pay Nvidia's markup. Especially since TSMC is the one making the chips, not Nvidia.

Risk #2: AI is hitting a wall. VCs claim is isn't so but it's pretty obvious that it is. We went from "AGI in 2025" to AI companies essentially adding traditional AI elements to LLMs to make then useful. LLMs will never reach AGI, we need another technological breakthrough. Companies won't be willing to keep buying every generation of Nvidia chip for ever-diminishing returns.

Risk #3: Geopolitical, as you mentioned. Tariffs, China, etc...

Risk #4: CUDA isn't a moat. It was when no one else had the incentive to create an alternative and it gave everyone on Nvidia a head start. But now everything runs on AMD now too. Google and Amazon have obviously figured out something for their own accelerators.

The only way Nvidia reaches enough revenue to justify their market cap is if Jensen Huang's wild futuristic predictions become reality AND the Googles, Amazons, Apples, AMDs, Qualcomms, Mediateks and every other chip company all fail to catch up.

What I see right now is AI hitting a wall and the commodification of chip production.
If you get a 2nd opinion you're just trusting another doctor.

If they disagree then what?
Tax every dollar over $999,000,000 at 100%.
I'll start off with, I'm not one of our founders and REALLY wouldn't want to be publicly held accountable for policies or commitments until I've been able to get internal alignment on things I say.

That being said, since I do manage our Search and Retrieval offering, if we were to deprecate any of our embedding models (which is generally the risk of closed-source models), I will make sure that there is an "escape hatch" for users.

Heard on what your concerns are though :)
There is no ideological coherence of fascism. It's about coercing a nation into elevating a chosen group/ identity of people above everyone else (a sort of anti-pluralism).

-- I liken it to how arguing about the shortcomings of your bully's stance doesn't make them stop punching you.

EDIT: I'm going to add, that I think the solution at least begins with encouraging more shared experiences and spaces (like a movie theater). Most people want to be seen as well functioning in public limiting how much they might explore the nastiness of their own right wing echo chambers.
very excited to play around. will be attempting to see if i can get character coherence between runs. the issue with the 8s limit is its hard to stitch them together if characters are not consistent. good for short form distribution but not youtube mini series or eventual movies. another comment about IP license is indeed an issue but its why i am looking towards classical works beyond their copyright dates. my goal is to eventually work from short form, to youtube to eventual short films. tools are limited in their current form but the future is promising if i get started now.
If you really don't care, sometimes you can just go plantext HTTP. I do this for some internal things that are accessed over VPN links. Of course, that only works if you're not doing anything that browsers require HTTPS for.

Alternatively, I would suggest letsencrypt with DNS verification. Little bit of setup work, but low maintenance work and zero effort on clients.
> How is 4chan unhealthy for the world, at large?

If you’re interested in research, the summary of controversies and harassment incidents that were worthy of the 4chan Wikipedia page(1) is over 2,000 words long and links to seven other separate Wikipedia entries, and may be a good start.

Also it is very funny that this thread seems to be multiple different posters here insisting that the user JKCalhoun is wrong for not being a fan of 4chan and that personal opinion is somehow ahistorical and in need of correction. Like the goal here is to make that person post “You guys are right I actually like that website now” ?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/4chan
So you bring them to your accountant and he scans them? You do around 100 pages every quarter? May I ask where you are living that he needs hardcopy?
that's the full link
https://lit.money/
I'm pretty sure every bank will auto fail wildcard certs these days, at least the ones I've worked with.

Key loss on one of those is like a takeover of an entire chunk of hostnames. Really opens you up.
>One idea behind the OpenAI social prototype, we’ve heard, is to have AI help people share better content. “The Grok integration with X has made everyone jealous,” says someone working at another big AI lab. “Especially how people create viral tweets by getting it to say something stupid.”

This would be a decent PR stunt, but would such a platform offer anything of value?

It might be more valuable to set AI to the task of making the most human social platform out there. Right now, Facebook, TikTok, Reddit, etc. are all rife with bots, spam, and generative AI junk. Finding good content in this sea of noise is becoming increasingly difficult. A social media platform that uses AI to filter out spam, bots, and other AI with the goal of making human content easy to access might really catch on. Set a thief to catch thieves.

Who are we kidding. It's going to be Will Smith eating spaghetti all the way down.
When my son was little, he would say things like “Yes means no and no means yes.” He would also say things like “milk is good, butter is made from milk, cake is made from butter, why can’t I have cake for breakfast?”

Through persistence and speaking to him calmly, he eventually stopped his petulance. Usually if he wanted something, we would only give in after repeated conversations. We wanted to explore decision making with him and ensure he would not quickly want something else. The main thing I wanted was for him to talk and explain why he wanted something so bad.

I believe he only threw a full tantrum a handful of times. When that happened we followed the advice of pretending to leave without him. When he realized we were not rewarding his tantrum, he stopped.

In short, we wanted to reward him for communicating not for throwing a tantrum.
If you get a 2nd opinion and it differs how can you make a decision as to which doctor is right?
It makes me so uncomfortable that the relatively informed people on HN seem to equate a human learning to AI learning.
Scaling Laws of Synthetic Data for Language Models
They’ve been doing that since the recording studio process developed the model in the 1920s or so. They would hire songwriters to make generic pop music with generic lyrics, and keep it in the vault until you have some attractive young singer you want to use for marketing then you give them an album of these songs to sing. And they are sure to sell because you’ve been priming the american ear for these chord progressions for a long time, and you fill all the air in the room with your marketing for this singer leaving people little option but to hear the latest carefully crafted earworm. Still happens today maybe even more perfected with psychological studies intersecting with music and marketing. The best musicians have never and will never be a product of that machine. Seek out live music.
The fact that they're trying to cop "smallweb" vibes while being incredibly soulless and flat at the same time is making me. so frustrated. This isn't "weird" in the alt sense, this is "weird" like how you would describe JD Vance.

Hillary Clinton is actively diving her head into her elbow-pit, and we cannot stop her. We can only watch in horror as she destroys the fabric of our universe and merges all that was once "cool" and "hip" into the conglomerate apathetic mainstream.
Just use Django/HTMX, Rails/Hotwire, or Laravel/Livewire
No, Mr. Marrek. My words are very much chosen, to the extent that my time allows. I am very certainly not using CollectiveBot to express my own thought.

I am not sure about what you could not understand. "I am sorry, as I would like to submit news about more pleasant matters, but reality is more pressing; I see that available information tell us that some events of potential particular concern emerge, as special cases in the running trends; I believe that it is best to transmit the information to this public, also as many of us have some relation with the source of those events and trends".
All this stuff is snake oil, either already, or eventually.

There's new models showing up regularly. Civitai recognizes 33 image models at this point, and audio will also see multiple developments. Any successful attack on a model isn't guaranteed to apply to another one, not even yet invented. There's also a multitude of possible pre-processing methods and their combinations for any piece of media.

There's also the difficulty of attacking a system that's not well documented. Not every model out there is open source and available for deep analysis.

And it's hard to attack something that doesn't yet exist, which means countermeasures will come up only after a model was already successfully created. This is I'm sure of some academic interest, but the practical benefits seem approximately none.

Since information is trivially stored, anyone having any trouble could just download the file today and sit on it for a year or two not doing anything at all, just waiting for a new model to show up.
> European car commuter rates are almost identical to USA's.

Hilariously untrue. Using the bus and bike to go to work is normal here. Buses and cycle paths are full of people during rush hour. In the US using those gets you weird looks. Depends on what part of Europe and what part of US we're talking about of course, but in general this holds true.
I don't think I've ever had an argument that I remember being a good use of my time.
>you don't believe copyright should exist?

Yes. It should not. I think that was very clear when I said I was against intellectual property, not for it being more limited.

>Do you think a movie's creator can dictate that I'm not allowed to use a pirated version of a movie to display for 100% profit at my 10,000 AMC movie theaters? Or a book's creator can dictate that I'm not allowed to copy their book, put my name on it, and sell it on Amazon for half-price?

I do not care at all.
It’s full of radiation everywhere, regardless in which direction we look and how highly we resolve it.
Whistleblower says DOGE may have caused 'significant cyber breach'
Decline in European Travelers to U.S.
If you're in a position to pin certs, aren't you in a position to ignore normal CAs and just keep doing that?
Yes, Mallory just pretends to be Alice to Bob and pretends to be Bob to Alice, and they both establish an encrypted connection to Mallory using Diffie-Hellman keys derived from his secrets instead of each other's. Mallory has keys for both of their separate connections at this point and can do whatever he wants. That's why TLS only uses Diffie-Hellman for perfect forward secrecy after Alice has already authenticated Bob. Even if the authentication key gets cracked later Mallory can't reach back into the past and MITM the connection retroactively, so the DH-derived session key remains protected.
Designers vs. Developers – What's the best way to hand off UIs?
Front-end devs: How do you actually like to receive UI designs? Figma? Code snippets? JSON? AI prompts?

I’m running a short survey (3 mins) to understand what works and what sucks in design-to-code workflows.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScZ7fuUAzGv8T_wzl8w...

No pitches. Just research. Would love your feedback
And now your list has 2 more items in it …
So you are against paying artists and musicians for their work? You are just entitled to it since it exists?
Thank you for the comment - based on your feedback we have enhanced a bit the experience for users without logging in.

Now on the landing page users are able to input cards to their liking and compare them at different vendors/categories to determine the best card without login.
A 4chan but images can be prompt generated? Makes sense. Everything's going back to early 2000s, it seems.
>They were occupied, but they existed.

So what's your criteria for existing, dirt in the same place? Their governments were dissolved. That means they don't exist anymore. Does the confederacy exist since the boarders are the same and the dirt is in the same place? I would argue not.

>Also lots of countries you listed definitely don't meet any sort of reasonable definition of "hegemon".

I agree, just pointing out countries that no longer existed.
Huh, I had no idea that radio tech has become so accessible to an unfamiliar hobbyist with a bit of curiosity. Enjoyable read!
Or, even more extreme: I don't want anyone to view or read my work, at all.
I am against all IP. I do not care what algorithms are used or in what way it differs from human learning, it makes absolutely no difference to me.
Now many minds per second does it blow?
unfathomably based
People have been publishing their work for thousands of years before IP even existed. We don't know if the system we have is the best one we could have, I doubt it though.
This is very nice, I played with it before and working on a similar idea in CL (I am one of those people who finds the uniformity of no syntax soothing).
> the deficit should be a bit lower because the money was not spent.

The durable problem with this logic is that it depends on the President overriding the written instructions laid out by Congress in appropriations. This power of the purse, of course, is one of the main checks in our system of checks and balances. Power is intentionally divided between the branches.

Is it even legal for the Executive to ignore the spending orders set forth by Congress?

So maybe the deficit is smaller (although we continue to pay the same tax rates), but the cost is we have eroded a foundational piece of our Constitutional republic.

We don't have to pretend like there is not a legitimate process to reduce the deficit if that is the expressed wish of the American people. And any time we veer from the proper legal mechanism, there will be unforeseeable ramifications in the future.

[Yes, in theory a smaller deficit can lead to a future reduction in tax rates. Congress can address both deficit and tax reduction to take place over several years this week if it wants. That's how the Constitution is designed.]
> studies claiming that parents who prioritize validation over correction

This implies that the two are mutually exclusive. I don't think that's true though. One can validate and correct at the same time.
mmm.page reminds me a lot of https://kinopio.club/ which is one of my favorite "fun" productivity tools
You can filter them out. For now..
Have you seen Adaptation (2002)? It has a wildly meta, fictionalized/comedic portrayal of Susan Orlean's book and the creative process of screenplay writing
They are using Git correctly.
Thanks for the question. We offer an innovative solution mainly through webflow integration with no need for complicated engineering. Happy to chat more about it offline.
>At the very least you should get multiple opinions.

And then blindly trust those?

Blindly trusting means you are trusting something without verifying yourself (as in "seeing it for yourself, not being blind")

This doesn't apply if you can't do that yourself
I don’t think this should be terrifying, this is how it works and how it’s always worked. Understanding this is more helpful than pretending people are rational machines and if they don’t agree with your reasoning, that means they are defective and therefore dangerous.
Oh my friend told me they did it for 360 subscribers too. Maybe the conditions are different.
Marketing/Sales, IT and the entire corporate culture in general is also to blame for over engineering. Everyone involved wants to advertise they know and use the latest tech. To say otherwise is bad for your future
Dan Abramov (author) also recently wrote a related post, React for Two Computers.

https://overreacted.io/react-for-two-computers/
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43631004 (66 points, 6 days ago, 54 comments)
They didn’t in 4chans heyday and they certainly don’t now. Hell, adults with decades of life experience can’t figure this out either.
And how would you know if they've been here for less than 2 years without a hearing where they can face their accuser and provide any evidence they have to refute it if untrue?
That's crazy. The whole "dank memes" thing and terms like based, boomer, wojak, and soy are all from channer culture. 4chan managed to brand gen Z as the "zoomer" generation. Its cultural pervasiveness is impossibly deep.
really happy to see something of a revival of interest for logic programming lately. it's an extremely powerful tool if you know when to reach for it.
Mitre support for the CVE program is due to expire tomorrow
> conceding our borders to a flood of third-worlders

Feels a bit like a mask off moment.

there's a mountain of evidence that shows immigrants are the backbone of important parts of our economy, pay taxes, and commit crimes at a far lower rate than native born people.

The laws and processes around immigration are a significant factor in creating "illegals." Why not adjust our laws to accommodate normal, innocent people who come here simply to work, live, and survive?

If we applied more resources to processing immigrants and making it easier to come here legally it would be a boon to our population, economy, and subjectively, our culture.

The opposite is true for deporting 11 million people. The cost outweigh the benefits at every single turn, unless your ultimate benefit is removing the supposed "third worlders" i.e. brown people. (aside: why is a person from the third world an inherent negative?)

The border should be permeable to people escaping oppression or looking for a better life. It's not like we're hurting for space or money, we just actually have to DO something.

Here is some great fact-based review of our immigration policies (from a source typically opposed to my worldview, mind you)

https://www.cato.org/testimony/real-cost-open-border-how-ame...

I hope you take the time to read through.

on your final point, regarding Palestinian support: what about the perfectly legal immigrants that we have deported because of political views? That seems particularly fascist to me.
That's great for shops with Dev teams and in house developed platforms. Those shops are rare outside Silicon Valley and fortune 500s and not likely to increase beyond that. For the rest of us, we are at the mercy of off the shelf products and 3rd party platforms.
> Also, not talking about US since they made their bed by bringing in through slavery, but talking about majority of Europe.

The majority of Europe is composed of formally colonialist nations. I am sorry, but to quote you, "they have made their bed".

> It feels like you are so scared of being seen as racist that you will sacrifice your culture just so you don't get called a racist.

I don't have a strong tie to my culture because I don't care much. My culture is lame, mostly. I already left my culture behind when I entered the melting pot. And, there is no American culture. We are a mixed and varied people.

You're proposed a lot of ideas here and, well, they're kind of shit. You're forgetting one teensy little detail - why are they good? Who does this help, and how? Okay, we revoke a bunch of work visas and make a bunch of people's lives worse... and then what? How does that bring economic and social prosperity to your nation?

See, you can't speak about mass immigration being a problem like that's a foregone conclusion. The US has had immigration on a level most European nations couldn't even fathom, and yet, economically we run laps around them.

Don't worry, we have our own anti-immigration people here. And yes, they're just as stupid and short-sighted. Trump is so anti-immigration he's willing to destroy our economy for a goal he cannot even articulate.
> It's the internet where slam dunks reign.

The internet is also where most person-to-person interaction is these days.
>Somebody going "I hear you" and then proceeding to make my problem worse or describe something completely different really doesn't make me think highly of them.

This is not at all validating, it's exactly the opposite.
Yes.

I also pirate every single book I read. Sometimes I buy them though.

I also pirate every single show I watch. I never buy them.

Music is a bit difficult, but I pay for Spotify, but I wouldn't mind paying for the service if Spotify had no rights to the songs and wasn't compensating the artists.
I assure you the US did not import $1.3M worth of machinery from an uninhabited island.

It's a data error. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/apr/04/revea...
Safety bypasses should be opt-in, case by case, and very explicit. For example, Rust's `unsafe` allows bypassing any limitation the language safety imposes on you normally, but all code not explicitly labeled unsafe is always in the very very safe mode.

Even inside the Typescript rules, `as` is a ridiculously dangerous timebomb.

Typescript is 100% about "convenience" and write-lots-of-code-now style of productivity, ~0% about safety or long-term maintainability.
Thanks Lou. You can use our app for homeowners screening, riders for ride shares. We don’t do tenant or employment check.
> Merit as defined by an administration whose cabinet is composed of Fox News personalities, DUI hires, and some of the least qualified people for the jobs they were given.

Are you referring to the defense secretary Pete Hegseth? He also attended Harvard so clearly there's some intersection in how both Harvard and the Trump administration evaluate candidates.
Sorry I rushed the URL. I was focused on presenting the name of the package. I have no idea what libraries.io is.
That doesn't mean you don't have due process to establish that the individual was actually undocumented. You don't skip due process. What's so hard about that? What if the individual is actually in the country with all of the correct paperwork and visas?. That's what you figure out via due process before acting.
Sounds like everything is solvable via code, and the hardware vendors just suck at it.
I don’t understand any hard math concepts, but usually they are either:

* Somebody’s name or,

* Exactly what they say on the tin

Right? The language of physics has some false-friends in English.
Some blood cells are produced in bone marrow and it's not rare to get "bone cancer".
Based on my own experience, YMMV, I find that those who need the validation before working directly on a solution are more annoyed by missing the validation than those who don't need the validation but get it anyway. Of course, it's good to learn the working styles of those you work with frequently.
Too late to edit. Here's a better clickable: https://pypi.org/project/beautify-http-server/
It reminds me of when I sent HTML back from my Java Servlets.

It's exciting to see server side rendering come back around.
"I imagine" which means they have no idea what they are talking about
It's the weirdest discussion, right?

> "You gotta follow the law!"

Well, how do you know the law isn't being followed if there's no due process?!?
Of course. Just like a company is allowed to release software which whatever copyright measures in place.

I also never said that artists should not be allowed to do this, just that I hoped their methods were defeated. The same way I hope copyright protections are defeated.
v0 of an api to get cve data
Why No KYC is the only way for crypto