skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There is a US indictment which lays out the basics of the which laws Medjedovic is accused of breaking.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/canadian-national-charg...
If you don't run anything different on the CI machine than locally, then how is your post an argument against signoffs? Why is it not continuous integration if the step is run on a different computer?
I think they won't bring him back because he's already dead.
I hope Gemini gets a desktop app where MCP servers are more useful, but wonder if Google's security posture allows it.
I haven't looked into this study but those are populations that generally have a higher level of obesity and also smoking, alcohol & recreational drug use. They also tend to have somewhat lower access to high quality health care. All of which are correlated with increased health issues like lower resistance to infection, less resilience to physical stress, slower recovery times, increased incidence of complications, higher blood pressure, diabetes, etc. And pregnancy is basically a massive, system-wide physical stressor.

My wife is physically fit and super athletic. No smoking, alcohol or drugs before or during pregnancy (as well as zero junk food before or during). And, unsurprisingly, her pregnancy was basically ideal. She had an easier time than any of her friends, but it still kicked her ass - especially the final trimester (fatigue, poor sleep, hormonal swings, etc). She joked it felt like birthing a face hugger from the movie Aliens. Her friends who already had underlying conditions or overall weaker health generally also had the roughest pregnancies, and many of them had various medical complications. They also had higher incidence, severity and duration of post-partum depression which can be a big issue (fortunately, my wife had virtually none). Plus my wife only worked minimally and entirely by choice while having great medical care that was local and which she knew how to fully utilize.
All EV specially in China have received subsidizes. Both swapping and charging have been subsidized at different times in different places. I would say battery swapping has received far less focus then other charging.

Just linking a few articles about limited subsidizes doesn't mean the company wouldn't exists or would be bankrupt if not for subsidizes. And some of the articles don't even specifically mention a lot of money.

First article, 40% subsidize on some stations in a single city. The build most of those stations before this new subsidy. So at best this articles shows that they might get some subsidy in the future.

Second articles, a few cities give out subsidizes for cars with battery swapping. Literally a pilot project that has only recently started. Third article just mentions the same pilot program.

Forth article, small change in regulation to existing subsidizes making it slightly more attractive to have a battery swappable car. Since 2020 regulations about what gets how much subsidy have changed many times over in China. And have been in general reduced by a whole lot as China wanted to get its industry of subsidies.

We are talking about a market of millions vehicles with billions of money put into intensives and infrastructure. With government putting in billions as well. Such as the US with the 7500$ tax credit.

To call them specifically 'heavenly' subsidized is just plane inaccurate, they got some subsidy, like every other EV maker. Swapping has got some funding once in a while, but its far from the primary thing that gets subsidies. The company didn't do swapping because it received the most subsidizes.

That's the same wrong argument people made about Tesla for years. Link to any article about the word 'subsidy' and then claim that the whole business only exists because of that.

Its not at all like hydrogen in California. NIO alone makes more cars then global hydrogen sales.

And just to be clear, I don't even like swapping or think that its a good idea but that it has bankrupt every company that tried it or its only viable because of some massive subsidy (that you fail to prove exists) is completely false. Nio has existed since 2014. Unless you can actually point to a subsidy program, specifically for swapping, that funneled multiple billions of $ into Nio pockets, I'm gone call bullshit.
> Obama promised to do this! he didn't do it!

True, but important to know that Republican congress stopped every attempt he made. He still got the number of prisoners down from 242 to 55.
Great Gleam talk if you’re curious. Got me interested in trying it.

https://youtu.be/vyEWc0-kbkw?si=sm0SbSNF_w5ouVc2
Was thinking of roughly in the similar line as with your other reply. But you worded it much better than I could. Thank You.
And don't forget about "extreme renditions" when people just disappeared
The generic version in TFA puts the data type allocated alongside the next pointer - no additional allocation needed. The only functional difference is if the zig compiler is not sufficiently advanced to understand it can reorder the fields (hence the alignment question).

The removal scenario is merely specifying that you are passing in ConnectionListNode instead of a Connection. Although maybe it's a good idea to think about how they compose comparatively.
You correctly describe my position, but I'd add that I don't yet see that perfect equality would be more desirable than some small amount of inequality.

Even behind the veil of ignorance I can imagine that, say, a society with a small amount of inequality would have higher average wealth and that most people would be happy with such a system even if, say, 10% of people were worse off than under perfect equality.

(For balance, maybe you could have a "crabs in a barrel" style of enforcement where all of the equal society members equally ensure that nobody becomes richer or poorer than anyone else. See e.g. this old story https://granta.com/the-black-sheep/ )
Agreed, though I think it's just going from a 1 horse to a 3 horse race
We need an importer to bring a case challenging the Constitutionality of IEEPA under the non-delegation doctrine [1][2].

“Duties on imports or exports” are Constitutionally “subject to the revision and control of the Congress” [3]. This is one of the rare cases where the Constitution names a branch of government when laying out a power.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Emergency_Econ...

[2] https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/nondelegation_doctrine

[3] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Import-Export_Clause
>a stellar job educating web developers on new html and css features, get the sack.

I have trouble relating to the evangelist fervor that some developers develop toward their craft.
macOS Sends Locally-Served DNS Zones to iCloud Private Relay
GPT-4.1 now available in GitHub Copilot and GitHub Models
I love this. Noting to implement in my own toy tetris clones.
Hey totally agree with the open source aspect here in order for SSH certificates to reach broader adoption (coupled with seamless admin and user experience).

Infisical SSH is actually an extension of the Infisical platform which is open source and used by a ton of companies for secrets management.
Feel free to lay the naming convention rules out for us man.
The question is how much of that carbon turns to methane in organic decomposition.

If that fraction isn't negligible, we'd be better off burning it. Determining that fraction, across a range of conditions, is nontrivial.
it's a particular issue with PE, who aren't really doing it for strategic reasons, but really are just there to make money.
Yes, (Vance) stable dictator is a local optimum, so it's harder to get out of.
Not trying to invalidate your feelings, but stewing in resentment is like drinking poison daily. Therapy can help you acquire the psychological tools and habits needed to help you and those around you live happier lives
> chatgpt-4o-latest, but it's bad because they continuously update it

Version explicitly marked as "latest" being continuously updated it? Crazy.
any chance someone here works at ford and is willing to share the full spreadsheet? I need some inspiration
OpenAI (and most LLM providers) allow model version pinning for exactly this reason, e.g. in the case of GPT-4o you can specify gpt-4o-2024-05-13, gpt-4o-2024-08-06, or gpt-4o-2024-11-20.

https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-4o
being a realist ... I think in the US no one is (purposely) thought basic financial literacy and it spills over into probably the first decade of working life
I wouldn’t really consider someone that moved from middle management to upper management/executive leadership to be a part of the “capital class.”

Investors, board members, maybe even some CEOs, sure.
> The contract between the two countries is only for 1 year, and that doesn't mean everyone will even stay there that long.

Where did you see this contract? I follow quite a few lawyers in this space who have been asking to see said contract and AFAIK it hasn't been produced. Can you link to it please?

> Do you honestly think the US is actually sending anyone to indefinite detention who has not received a life sentence in court?

Uhh... yes? This person hasn't just not received a life sentence, they weren't even charged.
I don't think you realize how much people use ChatGPT.
No, that is saying that some of the improvements that went into 4.1 have also gone into ChatGPT, including chatgpt-4o-latest (2025-03-26).
Numbers for SWE-bench Verified, Aider Polyglot, cost per million output tokens, output tokens per second, and knowledge cutoff month/year:

SWE Aider Cost Fast Fresh
Claude 3.7 70% 65% $15 77 8/24
Gemini 2.5 64% 69% $10 200 1/25
GPT-4.1 55% 53% $8 169 6/24
DeepSeek R1 49% 57% $2.2 22 7/24
Grok 3 Beta ? 53% $15 ? 11/24

I'm not sure this is really an apples-to-apples comparison as it may involve different test scaffolding and levels of "thinking". Tokens per second numbers are from here: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gpt-4o-chatgpt-03-25/pr... and I'm assuming 4.1 is the speed of 4o given the "latency" graph in the article putting them at the same latency.

Is it available in Cursor yet?
If Trump somehow ends up removed from office, Vance would have to tread carefully in order to avoid the same fate.
Prosecute, not persecute :)
If you read the last DoJ filing in the Garcia case, they claim the law invalidates orders of withholding for members of FTOs. I do not know if that is true or not, but I'm willing to believe it is.

So your question has been elucidated. They did it so they could invalidate parole or orders of withholding of removal by either labeling immigrants as in MS-13 or forcing them to join by tossing them in jail with gangs and then using it against them. It was a necessary precursor to the deportations.
I was hoping for native image gen in the API but better pricing is always appreciated.

Gemini was drastically cheaper for image/video analysis, I'll have to see how 4.1 mini and nano compare.
Whats the problem, for the layman it doesnt actually matter, and for the experts, its usually very obvious which model to use.
The same thing happens with Google's SafeBrowsing, Microsoft's SmartScreen, Bitdefender TrafficLight, or Emsisoft Browser Protection. Osprey essentially combines multiple already existing browser protection extensions into one.
I really like big deskpads. The bigger the better. Having a big calendar/grid paper sheet right under your keyboard makes it so much more likely for me to pre-plan things because I can sketch faster than I can type.

Here's an idea for someone: have some easy-to-rattle off key combo you can push to record the current state of whatever application is currently focused on screen (what project/files are open in my IDE, what tab is focused in my browser, etc) to a little sqlite instance somewhere. Show a notification with an easy to write down unambiguous ID that auto increments, probably including the date. Like 14APRB or something.

I can jot that down in my notepad. Later on, I can bring that workspace back up using the ID I wrote down, so that way I'm not writing file paths and method names down on paper.
> it's quite confusing to see half a dozen models to choose from in the UI. In an ideal world, ChatGPT would just abstract away the decision

Supposedly that’s coming with GPT 5.
I agree on both naming on stability. However, this wasn't my point.

They still have a mess of models in ChatGPT for now, and it doesn't look like this is going to get better immediately (even though for GPT-5, they ostensibly want to unify them). You have to choose among all of them anyway.

I'd like to be able to choose 4.1.
Yeah, well reasoned take.

Hackernews is way too defensive about AI. Open AI didn't go from 0 to $5b because of hype, it got there because of how useful it is.
Who’s next? You? Me? Person down the street?

Maybe…
While it touches on a lot of political topics, the essay felt more about economics to me than anything else.
Obama did sign EO 13492 requiring Guantanamo to be closed, in fairness, with a deadline and everything.

He could have and should have done more, but the blame for that one mostly falls on Congress (at the time firmly controlled by Democrats) blocking said EO
It depends on how you define "capability" since that's different for reasoning and nonreasoning models.
So AI is in this interesting place because while it seems obvious that it's an amazing, powerful, transformative technology... that actually hasn't materialized at an economic level, yet. Arguably the only place where it has a proven positive impact on productivity is in software development, and even there it's pretty obvious it's not a silver bullet.

I'm not interested so much if or when it will materialize economic value (that gets discussed here ad nauseum) but... how long a runway do you think we have where investors are going to continue to invest based on the promise, before the funding environment does shift? Because it will, eventually. And the LLM industry better have something to show that justifies current valuations or things are going to get very messy.

My fear is that we've entered "too big to fail" territory in which too much of the tech sector has too much to lose to be the first ones to start backing out. But that only means the bubble is going to get that much bigger before it detonates (and takes down half the economy with it.)
A cursory amount of research shows that the average premium for an insurance policy on the open market through the ACA is between $400-$2000 a month depending on options - family status, deductibles etc.

There is also COBRA that lets you stay on your employer’s plan. You have to pay the entire premium. I pay $600 a month now and my employer pays $1200 a month. That’s me + family.
heres the link to the game if anyone is interested: http://vibe-coders.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/index....
If it isn't "indefinitely", then did they specify his return date?
Darwin likes!
I'm not really bullish on OpenAI. Why would they only compare with their own models? The only explanation could be that they aren't as competitive with other labs as they were before.
Yeah, in the last week, I had seen a strong benchmark for chatgpt-4o-latest and tried it for a client's use case. I ended up wasting like 4 days, because after my initial strong test results, in the following days, it gave results that were inconsistent and poor, and sometimes just outputting spaces.
I want the US's system of checks and balances to be enforced as intended. If they are, and Trump is successfully removed from office (better, arrested) for doing what he's doing, then so could Vance, assuming he also continues to break laws.
I honestly have no clue what kind of thought process could result in believing that "blonde dancer" is analogous to "dumb Polack." "Blonde dancer" is just not problematic, at all. It literally just means a woman who is a dancer and has blond hair. There are no slurs or insults or even negative connotations to it.
it's worse than 4.5 on nearly every benchmark. just an incremental improvement. AI is slowing down
Good point, but how does that relate to, or explain, the decision not to release 4.1 in ChatGPT? If they have a nice post-training pipeline to make 4o "nicer" to talk to, why not use it to fine-tune the base 4.1 into e.g. chatgpt-4.1-latest?
We benchmarked GPT-4.1: it's better at code reviews than Claude Sonnet 3.7
I'm glad it's been deservingly downvoted.

It was at the top of the comments when I saw this hit HN, and it pissed me off to see a trollish shitpost in that position, especially when the post is about the community losing an awesome contributor (and a friend).
It uses the same exact framework as Google SafeBrowsing and Microsoft SmartScreen.
I tried "coins" so many times, getting so angry, before reading the title that said "video game characters"
Oh, very much likewise, but there's always two sides to a coin.
Awesome, thank you for posting. As someone who regularly uses 4o mini from the API, any guesses or intuitions about the performance of Nano?

I'm not as concerned about nomenclature as other people, which I think is too often reacting to a headline as opposed to the article. But in this case, I'm not sure if I'm supposed to understand nano as categorically different than many in terms of what it means as a variation from a core model.
I was gonna give a "well actually Pres. Jackson" reply, but then I remembered Einstein's Law--what you know may not be so--and did a little research.

So I have to "Well actually" my "Well actually"

https://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2021/08/the-myth-of-an...
Post-natal depression affects many mothers who subsequently go on to have happy lives.

Suicide among new mothers has a terrible effect on their surviving family and friends. Anything that can be done to reduce this death rate must be worth considering.
Serotonin has little relevance to depression and was more of a cute story doctors told patients in the '90s, that they were told by pharma reps.
Go look at their past blog posts. OpenAI only ever benchmarks against their own models.

This is pretty common across industries. The leader doesn’t compare themselves to the competition.
I do not know one person who has bought a pro plan. And especially now where Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is leaps and bounds better than their pro plan models.
I'm interested in this topic too, but am approaching it from an auditing rather than from an investing angle.
dude forget eating and sleeping man, my biggest concern is pooping. I need atleast 1 gallon of water everytime I hit the washroom to clean myself as I require portable bidets to clean the area in squat position thanks to some crazy medical history. How do you manage such a condition and travelling with the fact that I also need to drink atleast half a gallon of water, piss 10 times a day at the minimum. I am not exaggerating even once bit. Seriously, how do you manage traveling with this kinda stuff
Yes, but then you have to add that yourself to every prompt. It would be nice to tell your LLM provider just once "here is a tool you can use" along with a description of the API documentation so that you could use it in a bunch of different chat's without having to remind it every single time. That way, when you want to use the tool you can just ask for the tool without having to provide that detail again and again.

Also, it would be kind of cool if you could tell a desktop LLM client how it could connect to a program running on your machine. It is a similar kind of thing to want to do, but you have to do a different kind of processes exec depending on what OS you are running on. But maybe you just want it to ultimately run a Python script or something like that.

MCP addresses those two problems.
Just want to say I appreciate your posts here on HN and on your blog about AI/LLMs.
Didn’t some Democrats help stopping?
You have to understand who you work for - most companies don't really care about their employees - they are means to an end and if they weren't absolutely needed, corps would do the work other ways.

And Google is way past "Don't be Evil" days...
I'm torn. The step from C to any c++ is big. Now if you want anybody to be able to use your code they need to be using c++ or you have to provide a C api anyway. On the other hand, manually implementing vtables is annoying. Ive been sticking to pure C and haven't been bothered enough to go back to any c++ yet (about 6 months on my current project). I mostly only miss templated containers so far.
Multiphoton Display – Summary Requested by Readers
Several readers asked for a simpler overview instead of the full PDF.
This summary outlines the main principles of a volumetric 3D display based on multiphoton absorption in a low-energy plasma medium.

▶ Summary: https://blog.naver.com/as33sa/223833263822

It describes how real light points are formed in open space without screens or moving parts, using safe, narrow-band lasers in an ionized gas chamber.

▶ Full PDF: https://blog.naver.com/as33sa/223832151953

Any technical critique or implementation feedback is very welcome!
Thanks gorhill. Yes, this is true! Osprey only sends its stripped-down URLs to the services you turn on. Nothing more. It's as anonymous as it can be without using a VPN, afaik.
At Amazon? Yes, very likely.
The tricky bit about the NOAA affiliated survey was that the debrief was mandatory. The underlying justification for the whole study was that they were finding a higher rate of "I experienced harassment" in the debrief vs. in anonymous surveys and via criminal complaints and they wanted to understand why, and how to apply a correction to the anonymous surveys to address the manifold negative pressures on reporting.

> Presumably someone who's been the victim of sexual harassment or assault would be more inclined to participate in a time consuming survey to have their voice heard.

If you read the paper, you'd see that for certain kinds of incidents, this is true. If its especially egregious harassment or physical assault, those tend to get reported more often, even through regular channels. But if its just the bog-standard hostile-workplace stuff that we all have to attend annual seminars about, the reporting rate is very low, because the victims rarely feel like anything will be done about it. And its rare that anything's done about it, because the leadership doesn't have firm enough evidence that its a widespread enough problem to even do something about. What I'm saying is that even in the light of that NSF report, the Antarctic leadership are doing the same calculus you are and saying "well, it seems pretty endemic, but we don't really have any specifics". To which I say "well, then collect some specifics".

Also, re: data from military personnel, I don't have a clear idea how to address that, except to say that if military personnel are harassing civilian staff, or vice versa, that's a pretty serious problem irrespective of location, and the DoD maintains an office specifically to address that for all situations where military personnel regularly work alongside civilian personnel. So they, too, should be doing the same thing.

I know some people who worked on the NOAA Alaska fisheries study, and they were using pretty widely accepted methods for estimating e.g. "bycatch" - the incidental catching of undesired species during commercial fishing operations, because its impossible to have 100% coverage in the moment of all fishers everywhere. In general, compliance with the Endangered Species Act is evaluated via surveys that are processed and extrapolated using these same methods. The reason the paper even got published was because it turns out that those methods are pretty novel for e.g. human bycatch.

If you look at the figures from the paper, its pretty clear that the stated variance is because of year-over-year variation, rather than absolute uncertainty of the method (which checks out, if Ass-Grab-Greg or whoever finally got fired in 2016, you'd expect the harassment rate to drop in 2017, but you can't just ignore 2016 and prior when reporting for the entire interval).
Reasoning models have the o first, non-reasoners have the digit first.