skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
For starters, Google suite offers substantial storage so you can actually use it for doing those things, even if they're not as good as you want, for far longer.

And if you do want actual enterprise tier, lots of startups and even public companies use Google suite for all their teams.
China, who do have an industrial strategy. It worked for them.
Meshtastic has unicast next-hop routing since firmware version 2.6 released, like, a week ago.
Not to mention, the signal strength seems too weak and unstructured to be useful as a basis of any higher order machination. A supernova is unlikely to cause much of anything outside of its immediate vicinity. Unlike neural pathways that are highly structured and mostly lossless, radiation disperses out in all directions and weakens with the square of the distance.

Unless there's something big we're missing. Maybe the cores of stars contain the final ingredient required for DNA formation or something.
How and why I interview engineers for Workbrew
GP means unencrypted at the wire level. ClientHelloOuter is still unencrypted even with HSTS.
It's just a natural byproduct of poverty and a shrinking middle class in the United States. HN readers are not the target customers of Temu. It's those people who are living paycheck-to-paycheck and can't afford quality goods whatsoever. It's the same as the low quality garbage found in predatory dollar stores in poor neighborhoods.
So your position is -

- Egalitarianism is newspeak/doublethink

- McCarthyism is was an end to egalitarianism, until the 'previous regime' (which I take to mean a regime since 1959, whatever 'regime' that means).

- Stating some people are lesser gets you fired from empirical institutions.

In short, people being equal is soviet style communism, the old regime which included Regan and Nixon is over, and only now you can say what you want because something changed?

This here is a fantastic example of newspeak, doublethink. Thank you for that
For lots of people, logic and facts don’t have much power compared to emotion. Often it seems there’s no argument to be won.
I do like the vinyl and analog amplifiers. I certainly hear the warmth in this case.
Because it was, it had a bigger population than the US does currently.
Then all those countries under it's thumb declared independence, and that changed things considerably.
I am long on this project and excited about it.

I am wondering, why it took so long for something like this to happen for Postgres, where as Vitess existed for MySQL more than a decade. I am not an expert, but I hear Citus is not really a fair comparison with Vitess.
I used a bad example with the Date API, except that, say, using moment or date-fns and sticking to it would be better than jumbling them up. If you’re going to do a migration from one to the other then it has to be committed to.

Dependencies themselves can’t be good or bad. They only acquire that property in the context of the dependent codebase. And a codebase that you can’t spin up from scratch or easily grok because of its approach (or lack thereof) to dependencies is almost certainly on the bad end of the spectrum.

I’ve seen this destroy some python codebases internally. In fact, my choice of a JS example was unfair because it becomes an absolute shitshow in python once you have dependencies and transitive dependencies with very tight version constraints.
That doesnt really address how the leading manufacturer is also leading in the metrics you said are opposed to leading in manufacturing.
Permafrost melt poses 'significant risks' to Arctic regions, scientists warn
"If denaturalizations do start happening" sounds much too late to start talking about it. Best to be prepared sooner than later with how quickly everything is regressing.
Dagster is definitely one of the more polished orchestrators out there, and I like how it embraces the idea of resources and custom DSL-style components. It’s also cool that you’re using it at Magenta/Telekom at scale.

The only caution I have is that many orchestrators (Dagster, Airflow,...) are typically task-level or graph-level frameworks: they do a great job of linking up big stages of a pipeline, but I’ve found that you still end up writing quite a bit of manual or ad-hoc code. That’s not necessarily a knock on Dagster—it’s just the reality that orchestrators focus on coordinating tasks, rather than giving you a row-by-row DSL with robust side-effect semantics.

Still, those links you shared look super useful for seeing how Dagster can be extended with domain-specific abstractions. Appreciate you pointing those out — I’ll check them out
You’re missing a link for the Ford news. Dare I ask when you read about Ford moving production to Hawaii? Was it in early April by chance?

https://fordauthority.com/2025/04/ford-will-avoid-trump-tari...

> We’ll have more on this never, because this was our final April Fools’ article for 2025. We hope you enjoyed all of them!
> Weird is a brand new thing, but: Think of it as if WordPress and Notion had a Linktree-shaped baby. That is to say, a WordPress-type website engine with the editing experience of Notion and the simplicity of Linktree.

How many people that understand that, need this?
original title: Permafrost melt posing ‘significant risks’ to Arctic regions’ communities, scientists warn
If you had the chance to debate Hitler, would you start by entertaining the idea that maybe the Jews do need to be exterminated from Germany? Or would you see that as obviously absurd?
What is HMAC i still dont understand this part? Is it RSA encrytion?
Why? How do you pick an embedding model without benchmarks?
Author analysis here. This piece digs into China's strategic response beyond simple retaliation after the latest US tariff hike, examining the economic foundations for this shift and the real-world impact on key sectors like Tesla's supply chain and cross-border e-commerce giants (Temu/Shein). Also explores the broader implications amid heightened policy uncertainty and recession risks.
thanks for stopping by, slater. and for a warm welcome.

I'm new on here. if not markdown then what?

tbh I've never met a LI addict, so I wouldn't know if I saw one post.
garde – A powerful validation library for Rust
this reminds me of something that happened to me just yesterday:

i was at the playground, trying to convince my daughter to go down the slide on her own.

She kept saying it was too scary, so I went down first to show her it wasnt scary. Then, still not convinced, she said there were monsters in the slide! I, of course, told her I got rid of them on the way down. She pondered for a moment, then decided it wasn't so scary anymore. Shortly thereafter she went down the slide herself!

It was a funny, insightful moment, negotiating her fears without invalidating them.
It, indirectly, was, because it was the reason the country initially relied on decentralized citizen militias for defense in the first place. Many of the founders were worried that a standing federal army would be a tool of oppression, and wanted to keep most of the firepower distributed amongst the populace.

The system more or less worked until the Spanish American War, when the government realized that the militias need some sort of standard in order to integrate properly with the regular army when called up. This led to the creation of the National Guard in 1903. It was tightly integrated into the Army structure in 1933.

What arguably made the Amendment obsolete was the advance of technology. By the early 20th century conventional warfighting took too much firepower, support, and coordination for a loose citizen militia to conduct. At best they could form the core of an insurgent force, but the goal is always to not get to that point.

In theory, that insurgent force could work against a tyrannical federal government. In practice, even if most of the people with the civilian firepower weren't supporting the tyranny I'm not sure it would work out. Conducting an insurgency against a foreign occupier is a lot different than conducting one against a domestic oppressor.
> There's a problem to be solved

"valid"
It is, actually, necessary that God can't change. It is not _solely_ an article of Faith, but it's additionally something that someone without the light of Faith can know, although some pretty abstract thinking is required.

Most people think of the God of monotheism as a kind of super-angel. They think of Him as omnipotent, eternal, etc etc, but still something that exists in the same way that everything else exists. We say of a stone, a plant, a human being or an angel "it exists", and therefore, they think, we can say the same about God. This is the wrong way of thinking about Him, and it causes a lot of confusion (and it allows the Dawkinistas to put forth puerile arguments like "one god fewer"). It makes existence out to be something that God has, and therefore something that is, in itself, independent of Him. And if something is independent of God, then it would be higher than He is, and be something that He relied on, and that would mean He wouldn't be God.

It is instead much better to say that God is Being, and that everything else exists only in a derivative way. Everything else has being, but God is Being.

Pantheists and other monists argue that the universe itself is being, and that it can't ultimately change (the appearance of change is an illusion, they say). Their argument, to summarize horribly, is that anything other than being is non-being, and non-being can't do anything, since it doesn't exist. An acorn can't change into a tree, because that would imply that prior to the change the tree "is not", and that which is not can do nothing. The tree must therefore have always existed. Thus all change is an illusion.

They're mistaken insofar as they're talking about the visible universe -- change is absolutely real -- but what they say is roughly true for God. He can't change, because there is nothing that is Being apart from Him. Everything outside Him exists only derivitavely. This doesn't imply pantheism, because the things outside Him have real existence, but it is a kind of lesser existence.

A rough analogy: Light can't be dark. Other things can share in light without actually being light (noun), but they can't make light be dark. God is Being, and other things can share in his being but can't make Him non-being. Any change in Him would involve His going in some way from non-being to being. But non-being can't do anything, or become being. This is a very rough sketch of why God is immutable. This stuff requires some seriously abstract and non-quantitative thinking and isn't easy.

Job 38 doesn't imply that we can know nothing about God, only that we can't fully comprehend Him.
Use of published information is still always constrained by copyright law. If I had a copyrighted movie playing on my television visible through the window, and you recorded that, redistributing that recording would unambiguously be a violation of copyright law and piracy.

I’m also a little confused by what you’re saying here; are you asking whether scraper bots are illegal, or whether they’re immoral/unethical?
I gave up trying to change people’s mind in this widely divided world.

For starters, I will be arguing with a dozen of “social media influencers” who shaped the opinion and identity of my opponent.

And in the end, most people are not really interested in changing their opinion. They want me to change mine, or validate theirs, but would conveniently dismiss anything that does not match their world view.
Couldn't agree more.

Regarding the job offer example. I'll have 1 to sign every 2-5 years, I should be able to manage that myself.

That said, I'd love a better email client that wasn't feeding an advertising company. I'm planning to spend some time with this to see if it fits any of my needs.

Edit: Oh, this is just a gmail wrapper/addon. Nevermind, moving along.
> I don't really have an issue with any of the points you raised - why do they bother you?

Idk about GP, but bad science writing ("identification of conceptual equivalencies ...") does bother me. It's sloppy, and tends to hide possibly invalid shortcuts taken by the authors by being an impenetrable fog of words. That sort of thing is a very good indicator of bunk, and it tends to peg my BS meter. Which isn't to say that there is no place for that sort of language in a scientific paper, but that one should preface the use of it with an admission of hand-waving for some purpose.
I would not use this without a SOC 2 Type 2 compliance at the very least. Especially when email is involved and Notion-mail reads your from, to, body and saves it in its data centers. The compliance information is also contradictory. The webpage says mail is SOC 2 Type 1 compliant, while the FAQ says

"Is Notion Mail SOC 2 compliant?"

"While Notion Mail is not currently SOC 2 compliant, we expect Notion Mail to be SOC 2 Type I compliant by GA launch."

Either the FAQ or the landing page needs an update.
Wondering how this compares to the Gemini (preview) embeddings as they seem to perform significantly better than OpenAI embeddings 3 large. I don't see any MTEB scores so hard to compare.
What do you mean "ignoring" it? Biden deported hundreds of thousands of people, surpassing even Trump's records. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c36e41dx425o

If the only practical way to deport the "right" amount of people is to disobey the courts and catch innocent Americans in the dragnet and deny them of due process, then maybe we shouldn't do that.

You say that their motivations are understandable, but so are the reasons behind extermination camps. They are ruthlessly efficient. Having a reason for doing something does not make it right, just, or legal.

At the end of the day, we have sent dozens of immigrants with legal status and no criminal history to El Salvador's version of Guantanamo Bay, where people do indeed die with regularity. Here's something from last year:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/el-salvadors-prisons-deat...

So, we're sending Americans of a certain stripe (color) to camps in other countries where there is no escape, and where it is not unlikely they will perish.

What do you call this?
> "[There were] lots of discussion about who he is and how strange he looks," said Spark.

It's cool how he's doing a tilted-axis / pulling-apart / creating-reality / as-above-so-below pose. Even if it's just coincidental for the original photo I doubt it's coincidental in why Kubrick chose it.
I don't know, but why do we find this struggle to differentiate between fact and feeling so often here?
Its wrong
> Example?

I literally linked an article in my comment that had an overview, but here is a more specific one that addresses diversity statements in particular:

https://reason.com/2022/09/30/mandated-diversity-statement-d...

> As well as the sad truth that as soon as you take away "DEI" requirements the segregationists come back and purge the library, delete all the black Medal of Honor recipients from the website, etc.

This is literally my exact point. There absolutely should be a rational place that denounces both these diversity statement ideological requirements and the egregious memory-holing that the current administration is implementing.
You don't get any attribution, so how can you tell if they're using it or not? This seems like a philosophical argument instead of a technical one.
> By trustable 3rd parties?

Yes, that thing was hacked to pieces by privacy researchers.

I haven't been following updates on Recall since June last year: https://simonwillison.net/tags/recall/
> while leftwingers are not only disgusted by success but consider it heretical

The entire left wing rhetoric against billionaires is that they are not in fact successful on the merits of work that everyone else is doing, they are successful in cheating the system and exploiting others. We love success that happens within the same rules that we average people all operate in.

This is like saying that CoD players who are against aimbotters are "disgusted by success" when they point out that no one will legitimately have a 100/4/0 KDA (a more appropriate ratio for billionaire vs average person would be 1000000/4/0, but that would almost be too outlandish, which is why there are so many infographics showing just how conceptually confounding a billion dollars really is).
> I seek to maximize the prominence, usability and general success of my project, and as such I want it to have a presence everywhere it can have one

SourceHut is doing exactly how I expect them to act, and that's a good thing.

What did you expect from SourceHut, and why didn't you take this mindset off to GitHub in the first place?
You have a picture of yourself or a friend, with a watermark on it. You remove the watermark. Now the picture looks nicer when you look at it. Why's this difficult?
Close enough! The wrong 7 jumped out at me instantly although I didn't remember more than a few after.
This way financial madness lies.
> ?ing Errors and never actually handling them is just a terrible practice.

I agree, but that's kind of my point - that's all these Rust praise articles are ever showing :).

> But it is meaningless to talk about this without doing comparisons.

Not comparing to other languages/approaches however allows a discussion to stay about Rust and how to make things better instead of yet another fruitless discussion about which language or approach is better in a vacuum. I'm not interested in demonstrating that Rust is better than C++ or vice versa, I'm interested in Rust being good on its own merits.
It feels like they're making the same mistakes Evernote did. Both had an awesome product with a rabid fanbase. Then they alienated those fans by adding a bunch of collaboration bloat and features that nobody really wanted.
> But this ignores that there were many competing factions in 1945, all vying for power in an independent Vietnam - VNQDD, Dai Viet, Revolutionary party, etc.

You're leaving out France. At Potsdam, Vietnam was to be partitioned but France asked for and got her colony back.
Lots of government spending is supported by the vast majority of Americans. Police, courts, fire, ambulance, and military (though size is up for debate).
Yeah... that doesn't say anything. "Advanced networking"?

Meshtastic can also communicate over long distances by relaying through other nodes.

So what's the difference?
The action being called anti-american is EU members' reluctance to use Starlink.

It seems reasonable to not transit your data across a foreign network with deep political ties.
Another way how India does layoffs is by holding back multiple months' salaries "due to cash flow difficulties", suddenly sending them a mail of "you're fired" overnight and never paying them their dues, ever, leaving them destitute and crippling their employability. A lot of companies have done this, because they know they can, because practical legal recourses for salaried individuals are virtually non-existent in the country and its crippled judicial system.
Ask HN: Is there an OCR that might be able to handle field datasheets?
I am an ecologist looking for OCR that can take .pdf scans of my Rite-in-the-Rain field notebooks (which are sometimes quite dirty) with length measurements and extract them. I've tried tesseract in R, but it doesn't handle them well. I plan on using this as an additional QC step after I enter them by hand. Thanks in advance!
No, I haven’t looked into Snakemake or Nextflow yet, but they seem intriguing -amazing, thanks for the suggestion!
I also like that the first screenshot on the page shows an email from "Finance Dept" with the subject "Expense report status" as a "Cold email". That example almost definitely has some back story to it, thus not making it a cold email.
Cloudflare has been accused of playing both sides--they host services for known/associated DDoS providers while conveniently offering services to protect DDoS.
I'm not surprised by this divestiture - Investor confidence in Alterra has been low ever since the disastrous loss of their brand new capital ship Aurora on its very first mission.
Notion has been great for me since I started using it back in 2021. Hope they get all the success they deserve.

That being said, I'm honestly disappointed with their overall direction. The main product has not improved much since 2021, except for features I assume are catering to their big enterprise customers.

It's slow, the mobile app has bad UX, the Windows app is a memory hog and I run into issues whenever I build something more complex with it. It's still a great product, but as time passes I look more into alternatives...
It seems like AI companies are making a major bet on the idea that the output of their models can be licensed and used in products.
Interesting read in the link. Thank you. I wish the site wouldn't throw an error when one tries to subscribe.
That's what sourcehut is using.

As an aside, I saw this for the first time on a kernel.org website a few days ago and actually thought it might have been hacked since I briefly saw something about kH/s (which screams cryptominer to me).

A screenshot for anyone who hasnt seen it: https://i.imgur.com/dHOmHtn.png

(this screen appears only very briefly, so while it is clear what it is from a static screenshot, its very hard to tell in real time)
You realize that examples can extend to other topics?

"I am 60% confident that recursion is the best method for this algorithm." "Having had more time to study potential options, I am now 75% confident."

"I am sure that I parked my car here." "Oh, you're right, we were on the east side, not the west."

"I am predicting that I will enjoy the movie tonight." "Given the expressions of people leaving the cinema ahead of me, I am rapidly reconsidering my prediction."

Your objection seems to primarily come from a difference in definition for "changing one's mind" - the way you describe it sounds to me like a fundamental shift in an axiomatic belief, whereas I, and many others, use it simply to indicate that we are updating a probabilistic map.
As far as the "left", one need only consider the ideological rigidity around the topic of transvestites to see that specific, thoughtful, deep, data driven, and evidence based rhetoric is abandoned in favor of not hurting the feelings of a group of people prone to threaten harm to themselves for political and social gain.

Don't ever forget that the left cant clearly articulate what a woman is without resorting to circular reasoning.
You can not MITM a key that is being exchanged through Diffie-Hellman, or have I missed something big?
You can stream over bittorrent... I do it all the time, you start your download, set it to download in order, and then just start watching it.
The problem has always been that every token is suspect.
When i needed money for a house, without a good security i had to pay 1.6 and with 0.8.

Rich get richer, poor never see this advantage.
Fake Musk, Zuckerberg Voices Added to Crosswalks
Is Introspection a Bug or a Feature?
"just give them" doing a lot of work here.

Maybe I'm particularly bad at disguises or maybe my kid (just one, not the other) is Sherlock Holmes for food disguises, but this is nearly impossible for me. In that I can't generally find a way to do it.
Are we talking past each other? How is that anti competitive? This is literally the opposite: they embraced and validated their competitor by making them a huge offer, showing that it pays off to compete
What do you mean exactly? They just print some documents they need and get them mailed to themselves?
Optimizing Our E2E Pipeline – Engineering at Slack
I had the same thought, although voyage is 32k vs 128k for cohere 4.

Anecdotal evidence points to benchmarks correlating with result quality for data I've dealt with. I haven't spent a lot of time comparing results between models, because we were happy with the results after trying a few and tuning some settings.

Unless my dataset lines up really well with a benchmark's dataset, creating my own benchmark is probably the only way to know which model is "best".
have you tried ai chatbots? they are pretty good at ocr nowadays