skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Why would you expect a /s?

I understand their standpoint: it's their infrastructure, and their bills.

However my concerns are with my project, not with their infrastructure bills. I seek to maximize the prominence, usability and general success of my project, and as such I want it to have a presence everywhere it can have one. I want ChatGPT/copilot/etc to know it exists and to write code for it, just in case that brings in more users.

Blocking abusive behavior? Sure. But I very specifically disagree with the blanket prohibition of "Anything used to feed a machine learning model". I do not see it being in my interest.
Not trying to ignore your point. Generally the "right wing" view of crime is that it is solved by increasing coercive (authoritarian?) measures such as policing and punishment, with the implicit (sometimes explicit, as below) idea that it is the moral failings of the "criminals" that lead to crime, rather than systemic forces.

Tan (net worth $100M) explicitly rejects the systemic forces perspective and focuses on the moral failings of the weakest in society:

“Crime isn’t some abstract social problem—it’s people choosing to break the law. Stop excusing shoplifters and drug dealers as ‘victims of circumstance.’ We need consequences, not endless debates about root causes.”
From a geographic standpoint, the conflict isn’t state vs. state this time around, though, it’s rural vs. urban. Blue cities in red states. Red counties in blue states. Not very conducive to conventional military conflict.
> I've seen most of them moving to internally signed certs

Isn't this a good default? No network access, no need for a public certificate, no need for a certificate that might be mistakenly trusted by a public (non-malicious) device, no need for a public log for the issued certificate.
I wonder how many forums run by the barely able are going to disappear or start charging.

I fairly regularly get cert expired problems because the admin is doing it as the yak shaving for a secondary hobby
Worth mentioning though, that BestBuy's website also has the same garbage "marketplace" problem as Amazon
> AGPL-3.0, free for research and educational purpose...

...or any other purpose allowable under the AGPL like, wait for it, commercial purposes.
You won't get visibility from AI.

I'm curious what your project is. Blockchain?
Companies have software to manage this for you. We utilize https://www.cyberark.com/products/machine-identity-security/
This feels like begging the question. But, in the interests of the topic, how should I see things when one branch of government is not only openly, but gleefully ignoring the will of a coequal branch while the third branch looks on in impotent compliance?
^ This is the real advice. Approach a conflict as a choice the child needs to make, and the options the parents need to give. Be flexible but hard where it counts.

Children need grounding. "I need to win arguments with my own kids" is a vanity, that gives up a lot of the ground kids need for growing up.
> More complex examples, like IN (1, 2, 3) or id != 25 can be handled as well. For the former, we can hash all values and route the query to the matching shards. For the latter, we can do the opposite.

This makes it sound like the query would be routed to all shards except the one matching HASH(25). But wouldn't id != 25 need to go to all shards, since there could be values in the id set that hash to the same shard as 25?
The Heard and McDonald Islands debacle was poorly reported on.

It does have its own customs zone, it doesn’t fall under Australia.

Some years, the World Bank has reported imports from the island:
https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/USA/Yea...
I'll remember this for my Faceit solo Q lobbies.
It makes sense though -- Gmail has little in common with normal email besides usage of SMTP transport, and has a lot bigger market share than normal email. (Exchange also doesn't count as "normal email" - so that's the reason for my confident assertion.)
To the person who posted on a genealogy forum on January 15, 2000
This would be fine in an ideal world. However, the one we live in has crawlers that don't care how many resources they use. They're fine with taking the server down or bankrupting the owner as long as they get the data they want.
I feel like we broadly agree and are just griping over the semantics of what “made up my mind” means.

> argumentation becomes boring once you are at the point where you feel there is nothing left that you can learn

Agreed, but here is the thing: there are plenty of topics on which I feel like “there is nothing left to learn,” but that doesn’t mean to me personally that there is nothing left, it just means I believe it is extremely unlikely to find anything new. Just by the definition, I wouldn’t know if there was anything new I haven’t learned yet, otherwise I would’ve went and learned it myself already. So that potentially new stuff would have to come from elsewhere.

However, I can definitely express my belief in the likelihood of discovering something new on the topic being extremely low, which is what i count as “i made up my mind” for myself personally.
I wonder why that is. Are they using some features specific to Gmail? Maybe search so that they don’t have to maintain their own indices?
It does make a lot of sense though.

I have gmail for ages now and i do not switch over to iphone/apple or microsoft.
I do wait for google to provide AI features on Gmail and GDrive.

If your central live tool is notion, i would want to have my emails in it too.
Right. There's always been a range of products from cheap to quality. But "cheap" used to mean something that wouldn't last as long or that had limited features, but that could still be worth the lower price. Now "cheap" can mean something that will break the first time you use it, at which point is any price low enough?

I bought a garden hose sprayer at Dollar General for $1, and it leaked immediately. $1 is so little now that it was basically free, but even for free it wouldn't have been worth it, and I'm not going to make a trip to get a $1 refund. At some point, "cheap" is so bad that it has negative value, as it only adds clutter and waste.
Who makes the decisions about what is getting flagged

Users flag things.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43227619

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43624035

a news story that seemed pretty important for tech workers to be aware of

That's not really a driving principle of HN - it doesn't actually work like that. It doesn't entirely not-work like that but it mostly doesn't work like that.
I remember that when the first influxes of LLM crawlers have hit Sourcehut, they had some talks with Cloudflare which ended when CF demanded an outrageous amount of money from a company the size of Sourcehut. If I find the source for this, I'll update.

[edit] Here's the source: https://sourcehut.org/blog/2024-01-19-outage-post-mortem/#:~...
I think the comment was tongue-in-cheek.
It's not widespread. But China has made an effort to offer obscene amounts of money to attract smart professors and researchers to switch to Chinese universities as they've tried to build up their top-tier beyond Beida and Tsinghua.
>What would you do to act against this?

Bloc building. Europe has countries which do lots of manufacturing. Use those to gradually reduce reliance on China by slowly restricting Chinese access to the Bloc market and build up supply chains inside the Bloc.

Making everything in the US can not be done without a very severe decline in living standards.

>Is doing nothing acceptable?

How high is your desire to learn Chinese?
Do you (or anyone) recommend any text based resources laying out the state of enterprise TLS management in 2025?

It’s become a big part of my work and I’ve always just had a surface knowledge to get me by. Assume I work in a very large finance or defense firm.
Much to the same opening as the article I have a little saying I have to myself:

Don't get into a battle of wills with a kid - they don't even know they're taking part.
We might be saying the same thing, but one reason toddlers act so ridiculously is because they are emotionally responding just as an adult might, if they were treated like a toddler. Ie, “because I don’t think you have a valid internal POV, I’m going to just decide for you with no explanation”

This perspective comes from the book “how to talk so kids will listen and listen so kids will talk,” which is one of my favorite parenting books of all time.
It's... the news, for the last decade or so.

2016 was when Trump suggested that his supporters could shoot Hillary if he lost, and that didn't immediately end his candidacy. That was a shocking development. It's been downhill since.
You're thinking about this wrong. There's no place for logical questions here.
You might see it that way, but employers won't. You can't skip the line because you think you're good enough to, almost every junior engineer thinks the same way.

There's so much more to programming that just being able to write code without relying on AI. Otherwise boot camps would have been more effective.

Until you have years under your belt of dedicated building, you're not a senior engineer
The problem is that factual comments can also be partisan.

- When Biden did dumb stuff, pointing that out was "right-leaning"

- When Trump does dumb stuff, pointing that out is "left-leaning"

Honestly, the greatest improvement to discourse would be stopping trying to apologize for current fuck-ups by pointing at past fuck-ups. That only leads to all fuck-ups being excused.

'Well the last guy...' -> Doesn't matter, not what we're talking about (and will even out in the long run)
What is the good reason?

Where I'm sat the only reason our three (?) social media companies restrict none illegal speech/content is to make it more appealing to advertisers.

I miss the internet before it was driven by advertisers and their investors.
you moved off gmail due to forced mfa of all things? interesting...

also, aren't 'app passwords' or whatever they call it still a thing?
I don't know, this is like saying that because those bowls of mints at a restaurant are "free", I can back a trailer up to the door and start loading it up. Even if you know they'll never run out of mints.
Right now they have a weird limitation that the Gmail address has to match the Notion account, otherwise you would get an error saying “the selected Gmail does not match your Notion address”.
What works one on one doesn’t actually work at scale. You cannot make MAGA feel better by “building the wall” or “balancing the budget” — they don’t actually care about those things, in aggregate. In the political sphere, they care — because they’ve been conditioned to care by 40 years of increasingly strident right wing propaganda — about hurting brown people and liberals.

I don’t have an answer, but reason and logic are not going to solve the problem.
You are framing it as danger which preloads the discussion immensely. I find this is common in these situations. This already ends the talk before beginning it. Imagine starting negotiations with Putin with “How come you are such a waste of valuable oxygen?”

I am not “on the right”, but I do have the ability to entertain the idea my “opponent” is actually right and I am wrong. This can be a valuable exercise to get you in a more .. sympathetic frame of mind.

Let’s try to loosen you up. Let’s say we are actually not in danger and you and all the rest of you - excuse me, it’s for the exercise - “pearl clutchers” are actually ridiculously overreacting and misreading the situation. The world is dangerous right now and singing kumbaya is not going to cut it. Trump is weird and we all dislike him, but nothing you can offer will improve the situation.

Try to see that viewpoint. Try to feel it. Try to imagine a world where you are wrong and your “opponent” is actually right and you were “suppressing” them all that time and in your righteous might caused tremendous harm which resulted in this correction.

Next time enter the discussion with “These times are complex and there sure is a lot going on. Let’s talk because I’m confused!” instead of “I am right and why do you take so long to see that I am clearly knowledgable and you should definitely heed all my warnings (which with 98% probability come down to ‘you are basically stupid’)”
Whether it's teetering depends on how strong it is, but here are a few of the most unequivocal reasons why we know it's under attack, and that the defenses are weakened:

- A conspiracy to refuse to leave the white house went unpunished at the highest levels of government.

- Congress is refusing to cancel declarations of emergency that grant the executive special powers with enormous impact.

- Habeas corpus has been violated many times and the judicial branch has been limited to ineffectively "ordering" it to stop in one case.

There are many others, but the ones that are overtly political tend to be "invisible" to people who agree deeply enough. For example, Chinese-style social media scanning for visa holders seems to only bother people who do not see the US as being in a state of war related to what their social media is being scanned for.
I think it's absolutely critical when I'm sending a password to a site that it's actually the site it claims to be. That's identity. It matters a lot.
Some might call that God. Or at least some form of Pantheism
You're right. Good catch, I'll fix this in the article.
... open to the internet, adding an allow rule to the host firewall (at least on linux)
Why? Britain was considered a larger power in the world until around WWII.
Ubisoft is a huge corporation(I used to work there) - there are projects which are money makers and which have to be smoothed out and appeal to the largest possible group of people, but there is still a crazy amount of creativity happening in various corners of the company. For every Assassin's Creed there are 10 projects being worked on out of which maybe 1 will actually come out - generally if you can pitch an idea within your studio there is a good chance you will get internal funding for 6-12 months to work on it with a small group of other people. Passing other milestones on the way to release is much harder, but this kind of "work on anything and see if it works" approach is very much encouraged. OddBallers and RollerChampions being probably some of the better examples lately, and Grow Home much earlier.
"Just a guess though, I don't know for sure the authors intentions/meanings."

I am reminded of this posting from years past:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38496499

"A lot of hacking groups, terror organizations and other malicious actors have been using cloud flare for a while without them doing shit about it. ... It's their business model. More DDoS means more cloudflare customers, yaaay."

I've not spent much time on this topic but I am very interested in the notion that a well-meaning third party established some kind of looking glass that surveyed cloudflare behavior and that third party was sued ?

I'd like to learn more about that situation ...
RPA - robotic process automation - basically automating manual computer processes. There's a big need for it, and every company has unique procedures.

It's basically scripting for legacy software, not glamorous or exciting.

In a similar vein there's a shipload of excel VBA (VBA hasn't been supported for years) out there that needs updating. MS is pushing office scripts but there's been very little uptake so far.

First step is to get a job, any job. Then learn their processes.
VR platform. We're actually opposed to any blockchain tech as an organization. We're into it for the users.

But I see no reason to have any issues with LLMs. ChatGPT/copilot/etc helping new people getting started? That sounds absolutely great to me.
Capitalism: UBI for the .01%

Not you.
There are plenty. The problem is that it's pointless and far less effective. Centralized servers work great. The only viable reason for P2P we have found over the last 20 years seems to be illicit activity. Everyone else is just fine with regular servers.
>There's a problem to be solved, so let's attempt to solve it or at least compromise in good faith

Of course saying "I validate that you are feeling upset" is going to come across as patronizing and insincere. But I don't think that's because they validated your feelings. It's because of the way the validation is said.

Part of what makes a conversation good faith is hearing out what the other person is saying and agreeing where there is common ground to build from. That necessarily includes confirming the pain points each person is feeling.
Illegally firing the IGs added after Nixon's shenanigans to make sure the executive isn't just wildly doing crime constantly under a veil of secrecy, right at the start of his term, was... you know, also a bad sign.
I feel like you need to present a very strong case where LLMs are "the public" before you take such a weak position when interpreting the entirety of the article.

Drew makes it perfectly clear in TFA that "the public", as he sees it, is fully entitled and should make use of the data SourceHut provides.
How does that relates to the parents post ? For sure you can understand Hamas is a terrorist organisation AND any the same time that some wants to talk about the genocide in Gaza.

Also, using a terrorism judgement as an argument is a bit weak because it’s subjective, and because our western gouvernement do trade times to times with terrorist organisations. Heck my own countries is classified as a terrosist and I’m totally free to come visit the USA (which are themselves a terrorist state).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_terrorism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-sponsored_terrorism
Yes, the game told me it was the preferred way and I followed the advice
That’s just uncalled for. Hope your day gets better.
To care about stale certs on snapshots or the opposite?
MITM attacks are common, but noisy - BGP hijacks are literally public to the internet by their nature. I believe that insisting on coupling confidentiality to authenticity is counterproductive and prevents the development of more sophisticated security models and network design.
With the advent of these modern medical breakthroughs I believe we have been rebranded from "plebs" to "blood bags".
I had a CT scan ordered for abdominal discomfort which had been making sleep a nightmare for years.

I started taking ag1 and Metamucil and the stomach discomfort has completely gone away over a span of weeks/months.

The resulting dramatic improvement in sleep cascades to just about everything in my life and different recurring health problems keep disappearing now.

It’s crazy how many problems can be caused by apparently just not getting enough fiber.

Never ended up getting the CT scan, which probably would’ve been expensive and involve some small degree of risk.
There have been copyright office rulings saying that ML model output is not copyrightable, so that last part of the suggested license seems a bit strange, since the rulings could preclude it for code at some point.

Also, it remains to be seen whether copyright law will outright allow model training without a license, or if there will be case law to make it fair use in the USA, or if models will be considered derivative works that require a license to prepare, or what other outcome will happen.
The Marshall plan’s effectiveness is more of a myth

https://miwi-institut.de/archives/2898
Sure. The point is, don't bother letting the apps themselves do TLS termination. Too much work that's better handled by something else.
Yes, but it is a lot more work to run an internal CA and distribute that CA cert to all the corporate clients. In the past getting a public wildcard cert was the path of least resistance for internal sites - no network access needed, and you aren't leaking much info into the public log. That is changing now, and like you said it is probably a change for the better.
I have slipped to the right enough to be almost like a "translator" between leftwing and rightwing viewpoints. Put it this way, I can laugh at parodies of both of them...

I see some error patterns that both sides seem to uniquely make, for example. Just 1 for each side for the sake of brevity here: Rightwingers idolize success without acknowledging the systematic boosts (or pure luck) that have often assisted it, while leftwingers are not only disgusted by success but consider it heretical. Leftwingers constantly compare a situation to some unattainable ideal and are therefore constantly complaining about the current state of affairs without offering a realistic solution; rightwingers fail to acknowledge the very real injustices that a more purely authoritarian approach to things often causes (see: three-strikes laws).

Speaking as one who tests politically center, I believe that the danger is neither nonexistent nor is as high as you may believe. Note that there is some merit to the rightwing claim of "MSM bias"; harping on the same cherry-picked injustice stories for outrage clicks over and over again seems to be the last remaining successful news business model (and this should worry EVERYONE).
"Caught us" implies that the capitalists, the people who own the manufacturing plants, did something immoral, or illegal or under handed, but in the economic system that everyone championed in America, especially at that time, this was simply allowed.
Seems like the fundamental anger is about the injustice of the economic system that leads to such consequences.
Gmail is like 30% of the email market and probably higher w/ their target demographic. Normal email is the not-normal email.
Figure out how to dismantle the secret Jewish cabal controlling the world behind the scenes. Read more about them here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_...

Seriously though, the Jewish control of the world (now Israeli/Zionist so you don't sound like an antisemite) is one of the most tired antiemetic tropes.

Also: Zionist expansionism is a ridiculous term. You do understand that Israel is tiny and has given lands to Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, and Egypt for peace.
Open the map and try to locate Israel on the map, it's a speck around a sea of huge countries. Even if Zionist expansionism was a thing, and Israel doubled in size it would still be tiny.

The other claims in your post are also weak, and I'd encourage you to learn more about the conflict from different perspectives. This is obviously a loaded topic and both sides are trying to control the narrative, but I believe you've been getting a very specific set information and haven't been exposed to the other side.
Pretty bad false equivalency. Barry was barred from running and went to federal prison. Yes, he was eligible to run (and was re-elected) but only _after_ he served his sentence. Did I miss the part where Trump went to jail?

You also can't compare a mayoral election with a presidential one.
So they bought and shut down Skiff to make this piece of garbage that only works with gmail?
I never made this claim.
Another day, another email OOPS, I mean GMAIL client.

It's quite sad when a testimonial mentions, "making the switch from Gmail," as if you're not still using Gmail?

Kudos to Notion though, it looks sleek.
> making logical arguments in this environment feels almost pointless.

Unfortunately this is the culmination of social media as a controversy machine, that promotes the worst arguments.

> ideological purity tests like required DEI statements

Example?

There's a controversy industry that cherry picks the worst examples of student-politics excess in these regards and then carefully conflates it with university policy.

As well as the sad truth that as soon as you take away "DEI" requirements the segregationists come back and purge the library, delete all the black Medal of Honor recipients from the website, etc.