skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If we had an authoritative way of determining truth, then we wouldn't have the problem of curating material to train an LLM on. So no, I don't think it's a separate problem.
A camera that is slow to autofocus is the result of market compromises to reach a price segment in a platform that is within the confines of a camera body dimension. That is not reflective of the state of the art however.
What is your alternative solution? Something like weighting the tariffs based on US production? What's the calculation using this method?
Try to come up with a way to prove humans aren't stochastic parrots then maybe people will atart taking you seriously. Just childish reddit angst rn nothing else.
Growing up around Seattle, I had never seen any billboard ads on the freeway. I had no idea it was heavily regulated in Washington State! I wish other states would ban them.
Looks like this one only applied to windows. Here’s a link to the diff: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/36dbbf3...
All exponential trends break (because exponential trends cannot sustain) -- this much is known. It's a question of when.
I tried it and it's a lot to take in. Never thought of it this way.
This is the story:

> The story is about DOGE, but it points out something curious:

> > On March 25, tech staffers and contractors at the VA noticed an unfamiliar name trying to push changes that could impact VA.gov code. It was Sahil Lavingia, a newcomer to the agency listed in the VA’s internal directory as an adviser to the chief of staff, Christopher Syrek.

> Who’s Sahil Lavingia, you might ask? Why, the founder and CEO of Gumroad!

The rest of TFA is a frame around this single paragraph from the original Wired story [0] and doesn't really add anything meaningful to it. The connection to the not-really-Open-Source release is tenuous at best, the heart of it is just "turns out Sahil is in DOGE, DOGE is bad, so boycott Gumroad".

[0] https://www.wired.com/story/doge-department-of-veterans-affa...
The share button I have uses the navigator.share API if it's available, or tries to fall back to navigator.clipboard. Unfortunately I think I didn't do adequate testing to make sure the clipboard feature works in whatever edge cases you might have the clipboard API but not the Share API, so I'm pretty sure _that_ is broken.

I really just put the URL at the end of the page with a `user-select: all;` to make it easy to copy _after_ you've read the content. It's also rendered server-side so even if I used utm or some other tracking things, the query params would automatically not be included in the server-rendered share link, just the permalink to the post.

But to the original authors point, I also do find myself often just copying from the address bar and then manually deleting a bunch of the garbage at the end of URLs. Maybe that's why I thought it nice for a simple "copy this link" when JS is disabled.
> Are you saying you think the semantics of that is anywhere near worth a billion dollar fine?

Did you reply to the correct post? My post was about what trustworthy information was removed, not about my assessment of worth or interpretation of a law in a nation where I’m not a citizen or a lawyer…
> because your hate is so totally different from their kind of hate

I just want to suggest that there may be a difference between hating a person for something they were born with, or for an uncontrollable feature of a person, compared to hating someone for explicit choices they have made.

Not saying that hating people for any reason is necessarily okay, but I think an argument can be made that there is a difference between those two cases of hatred.
Constant-time code: the pessimist's case
I think the surprising aspect is rather how people are praising 80-90% accuracy as the next leap in technological advancement. Quality is already in decline, despite LLMs, and programming was always a discipline where correctness and predictability mattered. It's an advancement for efficiency, sure, but on the yet unknown cost of stability. I'm thinking about all simulations based on applied mathematical concepts and all the accumulated hours fixing bugs - there's now this certain aftertaste, sweet for some living their lives efficiently, but very bitter for the ones relying on stability.
Wasn’t is-negative the dystopian past of ten years ago?
> mentioned it in another of my comments if you want to find it, on how the crashing stock market allows the government to refinance $10 trillion for lower rates. I think that's the goal here

You know that was a joke right? The people who said it were kidding around, you know, making stuff up?
> I’m buying investment cropland on the cheap from idiots who voted for him to trash their livelihoods.

I don't understand this sentence.

Are you saying you are researching sellers' voting records, then buying the farms of the ones who voted for Trump?
That's mostly due to the switch from CVSS 2 to CVSS 3
How to Build a Abundant Future [video]
Yes. The point is just because it has been done before and holds some interesting historical value doesn’t mean it is valuable to continue to do.
No that's not a transaction. We're talking about contracts. Derp.
I'm using Rust at my full time job, but I think it would be insane to go with it to an interview. It's so much overhead. Compare to almost any popular language, not only Python. My choice for now is Go. Many companies actually use it, it easy to learn and use. There are issues with it as well, but they are easy to overcome.
This has the advantage compared to OP's solution that it will also work if JS doesn't load correctly (as opposed to if it is blocked/deliberately not loaded). You can add this line to the end of the main JS file that you're including on your page, and it will ensure that the JS "switch" will only get triggered if that file could be downloaded and parsed.
Note that this is a very one-sided presentation of the issue - most easily seen by the fact that the article doesn't actually link to any of the unshortened quotes they're pushing: https://www.politico.eu/article/fact-check-european-commissi...
It reminds me a lot of how some of the victims of "faith healer" type people react when the frauds are exposed.
Are you saying 60% of California workers earn minimum six figures?
TV Vibes – A GPT that recommends shows by tone, structure, and creative DNA
I built a custom GPT prompt that helps you discover TV shows based on creative structure, emotional tone, and who made them — not just genre tags or “because you watched” algorithms.

It’s called TV Vibes, and it works like this:
You enter a show name, a mood word (chaotic, auteur, feminist), or even a vague memory (“that Japanese diner show with the sad regulars”)

It breaks down the narrative tone and pacing of the show

Then it connects you to other shows through story structure or creator lineage

Each connection is shared in a “vibe block,” which is a small, copyable text capsule (a code block) you can paste into any TV Vibes thread on ChatGPT (or send to your partner, roommate, or whoever’s choosing what to watch).

It’s kind of zine-like in tone, but built for people who trust their own tastes.

Try it here: https://chatgpt.com/g/g-67f183af3e1c8191a3a0f2832c71a833-tv-... Use the ChatGPT mobile app or web version.

It is AI, so it will do some funny things, like a bad friend would. I would love feedback, ideas, and vibe trails from fellow TV nerds.
> this sort of logic is why half the South Bay sits on Superfund sites

You think zoning solved our industrial environmental problems?
The anti-establishment fervor of open source crypto developers is the reason this is a problem though.

Most people, for most things, don't need to verify trust outside of normal government channels.

i.e. any business I correspond with, trust is via the government that they are a business bound by the relevant legal system I live in.

Same story with communicating with basically anyone: if their GPG key was signed by the common government key, then hey, good enough for anyone.

The problem is...we don't have the infrastructure for any of this. And GPG key servers are inadequate for maintaining suitable privacy for people if they were used at this scale.

But we certainly could provide the means by existing technologies: e.g. nothing stops us making drivers licenses and other forms of ID smart cards.
I've never had `cat` execute the file I was viewing.
That’s a fair point, but I am not sure how it is relevant, unless devs at mom&pop shops/legacy businesses/etc. and those outside of the US work more than the US lawyers (or any other highly-paid white collar job) or have barriers to entry similar to those. From those I know working at those places (and from working at a legacy business myself at one point, a big bank), that didn’t seem to be the case at all. At startups, sure, but that’s just a high risk/high reward type of a deal, and they still don’t have almost any barriers to entry either.

Is it the case outside of the US? Genuine question, because I am not super familiar with close reality dev jobs outside of the US. But from what I saw, it didn’t strike me as an obvious thing that they get ground to the bone or have high barriers to entry (as opposed to other highly-paid white collar jobs).
Autofocus systems are designed to stop race cars in travel today already. And besides, why argue hypotheticals here when I look out my window and I see teslas self driving just fine? The system is proven despite your feelings about it. And if it was truly unsafe or compromised we'd have seen a good deal of evidence a this point what with the amount of users self driving and the mileage they've been traveling, not to mention how many people in the media are so desperate to find such evidence and publish some pulitzer attempt about it given the sentiment around Musk these days.
That "good enough" is the problem. It requires context. And AI companies are selling us that "good enough" with questionable proof. And they are selling grandiose visions to investors, but move the goal post again and again.

A lot of companies made Copilot available to their workforce. I doubt that the majority of users understand what a statistical model means. The casual, technically inexperienced user just assumes that a computer answer is always right.
I accused you of voting for a racist. I made no conjectures beyond that.

Just because his well-documented racism doesn't affect you doesn't mean it's non-existant.
Well I was a freelancer back in the days, before I joined corporate and would have really appreciated this. Let me see if I can get this to the right people.
There is a lot to complain about but complaining that a for profit company's enterprise tier profits isn't going to contributors of an open source project is one bridge too far. Contributing to open source isn't about getting paid if for profit companies using open source make money.

Open source code is the payment. No one has to work on someone elses open source project but many do because they use the project and have modified it and now want those changes part of the project for everyone because it means you don't have to maintain two versions. Some do it for street cred. Some convenience others to sponsor them because their company uses the project and wants to shape it. Some do it to give an option over for profit companies in the same space. Some want to make the impossible possible (printer drivers on linux for a specific model)

But no one should help expecting to get paid if someone else makes money from it. This includes the creator (looking at you wordpress).
> if we were neither the world's police nor the world's bully.

I too would prefer a more peaceful US (and you could continue spending in making the world aspire to be more US-like via USAID). I like the idea behind the country, but the more I understand about the implementation, the less faith I have on it being an example to be followed.
It's one revolution every 1.8 seconds. That seems too fast for most roundabouts, but maybe not uncontrollably so.

78 rpm is Formula One territory.
Also that it's in the Java parquet library, which somehow is nowhere in the article
What happens if the sender's Google account ceases to exist for whatever reason? What if Google ceases to exist?

I know that there are a lot of HIPAA "secure email" solutions that also do this, but I don't want this to become more common practice then it already is...
Reference counting is quite literally a subset of garbage collection.
The comparison of AI to the fey is the sort of thing I’d normally object to because I dislike mythologizing AI.

But it’s REALLY apt sometimes
Ah, but isn’t that the problem here - asking an LLM for facts without requesting a search is like asking a PhD to answer a question “off the top of your head”. For pop culture questions the PhD likely brings little value.
Or the camera - think about how it puts all those portrait painters out of a job, and it makes anyone who can click a button think they’re some kind of genius artist, and it’s ruining the environment with all the toxic waste produced from developing the film
I guess minimal gmail for e2e is the tariff we have to pay for privacy and freedom. wink.
Not sure if I understand, because my templates are also multi-file and multi-js-module, where needed. It's only the result that is a single root-pasteable script (per server) which generates a single /etc/foo/foo_config file per service. So I think I'm lost again about changes.

You don't want instance-local changes. Do you? Afaiu, these changes are anti-pattern cause they do not persist in case of failure. You want to change the source templates and rebuild-repropagate the results. Having ./foo.d/nn-files is excessive and serves litte purpose in automated mode, unless you're dealing with clunky generators like ansible where you only have bash one-liners.

What am I missing?
nfo: https://pastebin.com/iLk9B0ef

COMMENTS: │
│ THIS IS A WORKPRINT! THIS IS NOT A FINAL VERSION OF THE MOVIE! │
│ Contains unfinished CGI and different songs than the final release. │
│ Colors have been adjusted. │
│ Retail English audio synced. │
│ Logo and ads have been removed. │
│ English AI SRT Sub Also Added │
│ If You Have Any Cam Audio Or Video Send Me A PM │
│ or Email to will1869@protonmail.com or DLManic987@proton.me
If you go by the classic Joel Spolsky hiring criteria, all that matters about hiring is if the person is “smart and gets things done” of course it also has to be someone you want to work with.

It really doesn’t take that long to prove those traits. True working in consulting I got to do it fast. I’ve got to get to know the customer, understand their problem, deal with the organizational issues, get them to accept the solution and implement the solution.

During that time, I get to know a lot of directors and CxOs on the customers side and got a chance to meet my AWS coworkers who moved on to use their network to get better jobs as they did the same.

Just for reference, both companies - AWS and the third party consulting company I work for now are full time positions. I was only looking for full time direct hire positions.
Depends on whether you are talking about an abstract physics model or actually existing rocks on earth. (And actually gravitational force is proportional to both masses.)
My theory is any system you pick would work if it was run with good faith. The problem with the US system is the financial oligarchy that runs the US sees bad faith as a feature.
Bad guys change their IP addresses and make up domain names a lot. No
shit. You need a name for that? Whose in charge here?
The question in the grandparent was "Can you install this library?". Not a command "install this library".

If you ask an assistant "does the nearest grocery store sell ice cream?", you do not expect the response to be ice cream delivered to you.
He did, but the light blue touchpaper website is still up for me. It is the collective blog of the security group at Cambridge university, so I would guess likely to continue.
C++ devs need to understand the difference between:

Vec1[0];
Vec1.at(0);

Even the at method isn’t statically checked. If you want static checking, you probably need to use std::array.
Well when the tyrrany of those with a voice in local politics has a say so of course. Not many people put a voice to 15 year olds who might want to walk to another 15 year olds house for once. Maybe that is why all the youth tend to move out of these sorts of places over time and average age marches up in the decades after the initial sell off of the then new tracts to new families.
You think that's a simpler explanation? Ok. I think given the amount of effort that goes into "safety" on these systems that my explanation is vastly more likely than somehow this information got lost in the vector soup despite being attached to his name at the top of every search result[0].

0 https://www.google.com/search?q=did+paul+newman+have+a+drink...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Digital_Service
That's foolishly confusing.

It breaks the original metaphor, and nobody knows it or the confusing borders of the definition - bad for communicating.

Most people seem prideful to self-identify into blue-collar or white-collar.

What's the meaning of the obviously next step pink-collar or black-collar?
Fact checking is paranoia?
I am not aware of any study.

I am talking in regards to censorship by the platform, not from the government/legally required.

It is a personal observation, but one I think it's clearly observeable by anyone that looks at them. I don't need a study to tell me that Tokyo is cleaner than SF, or that 4chan has less censorship than reddit.
"Lisp is so powerful that problems which are technical issues in other programming languages are social issues in Lisp."

So true. Lisp was designed to give individual programmers tremendous power. That means Lisp programmers sometimes prefer to reinvent solutions to problems rather than learn to use some existing solution. This tendency can be an absolute nightmare on a software engineering team.

Not that using Lisp on a software engineering team cannot be done, but it requires very strong discipline and leadership. The absence of strong discipline and leadership on a Lisp SWE team can lead to enormous amounts of wheel reinvention and technical debt.

Obviously discipline and leadership are necessary for any SWE team but languages like C don't encourage reinvention nearly as much as Lisp does, and Lisp programmers in general tend to be very resistant to the imposed discipline that SWE requires. (I say this as a diehard Lisp programmer, so I'm talking about myself.)
The Telesync version is out for days too and it's pretty good quality.

But honestly the workprint version's jankiness somehow makes it fun. Like those music videos with music removed on Youtube
> I'm not going into how much this is not E2E, as this has already been proven

By whom? It looks like E2E to me. It’s just that both ends are controlled by the same entity.
Yes, here's the link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21934v1

Anecdotally, I've been playing around with o3-mini on undergraduate math questions: it is much better at "plug-and-chug" proofs than GPT-4, but those problems aren't independently interesting, they are explicitly pedagogical. For anything requiring insight, it's either:

1) A very good answer that reveals the LLM has seen the problem before (e.g. naming the theorem, presenting a "standard" proof, using a much more powerful result)

2) A bad answer that looks correct and takes an enormous amount of effort to falsify. (This is the secret sauce of LLM hype.)

I dread undergraduate STEM majors using this thing - I asked it a problem about rotations and spherical geometry, but got back a pile of advanced geometric algebra, when I was looking for "draw a spherical triangle." If I didn't know the answer, I would have been badly confused. See also this real-world example of an LLM leading a recreational mathematician astray: https://xcancel.com/colin_fraser/status/1900655006996390172#...

I will add that in 10 years the field will be intensely criticized for its reliance on multiple-choice benchmarks; it is not surprising or interesting that next-token prediction can game multiple-choice questions!
Show HN: AI-Powered Face Shape Detection for Personalized Style Recommendations
Hey HN, I wanted to share a project I’ve been working on: an AI tool that instantly detects your face shape and provides personalized recommendations for hairstyles, glasses, and makeup. I got the idea after noticing how tricky it can be to find styles that truly suit your unique features, and I wanted to make that process easier and more data-driven.

The tool uses computer vision to analyze facial features and classify face shapes, then matches them with style suggestions based on some geometric and aesthetic principles I researched. Building the AI model was a fun challenge—training it to accurately detect face shapes while keeping it lightweight for quick results took a lot of iteration. I also worked on making the recommendations practical and user-friendly.

I’d love to get your feedback! What do you think about using AI for this kind of personalization? Are there other features or use cases you’d find interesting? If you’ve worked on similar computer vision projects, I’d be curious to hear about your experiences too.

Looking forward to your thoughts!
Work study jobs vary a lot. Some of them are just wiping whiteboards after the lecture ends in the 300 person classrooms or walking around the library taking headcount every 30 mins. Front desk shifts at the dorm were also another easy one; hand over a package every now and then just do homework or slack off otherwise. Other ones probably work you like a dog and it isn't clear to be fair what the best ones might be as far as working in homework at the same time unless you get an upperclassman to tell you.
Necessary tools:

Microsoft Visual Studio 2019 or 2022
Wix v3.14 Toolset
Visual Studio extension for Wix v3 Toolset

To build the application... (You get the idea.)
This is very interesting article! In https://expr-lang.org we did our own research and a paper about comparison on different vm implementation in go:

- https://expr-lang.org/blog/exploring-virtual-machines-for-em...
It's so dumb to assign it a CVSS score of 10.

Unless you are blindly accepting parquet formatted files this really doesn't seem that bad.

A vulnerability in parsing images, xml, json, html, css would be way more detrimental.

I can't think of many services that accept parquet files directly. And of those usually you are calling it directly via a backend service.
I haven’t been in Java for a good while. When did they do that?

Static initializers used to load on Classloader calls.
Because it’s accessible, useful, and interesting. MCP showed up at the right time, in the right form—it was easy for developers to adopt and actually helped solve real problems. Now, a lot of people know they want something like this in their toolbox. Whether it’s MCP or something else doesn’t matter that much—‘MCP’ is really just shorthand for a new class of tooling AND feels almost consumer-grade in its usability.
If you got as far as checking the output it must have appeared to understand your question.

I wouldn't claim LLMs are good at being factual, or good at arithmetic, or at drawing wine glasses, or that they are "clever". What they are very good at is responding to questions in a way which gives you the very strong impression they've understood you.
That last sentence is baseless, alarmist nonsense. The rest, makes some sense. We are definitely one of the most surveilled societies in the western hemisphere, but just look at the press here. If you think there’s a fear of criticising government in the UK, except in a (probably paranoid) minority, you’re deluded. Let’s also remember that an arrest is a very long way from a conviction, and others have pointed out.