skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It seems more likely that Apple would've adapted this from the proven technology that they currently use for Apple Books and everything else, TextKit (which first appeared in OpenStep). https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2021/10061/
>Most people dislike wearing fake clothes and the dislike wearing fake watches or fake jewelry

I'd disagree. Most people don't like buying something 'real' then finding out it's fake. Far more people don't mind an actual fake if it's either high quality or is very low priced.
Tariff: The well-travelled Arabic term that became a byword for isolationism
> Trump has dismissed the AP, which was established in 1846, as a group of “radical left lunatics” and said that “we’re going to keep them out until such time as they agree it’s the Gulf of America.”

Being the most respected non-partisan source for both left and right media outlets apparently doesn't mean anything if you dare name what must not be named.
I use DDG multiple times a day, every day. I don't find ChatGPT to be a suitable substitute for helping me locate resources on the web; hallucinated links waste my time trying to get to useful information.
Grinding my teeth at night, because I wanted to murder a third of my coworkers and I didn't feel I could find another job.
Your comment made me think of cheetahs. An article once claimed that the biggest reason for cheetahs to perish in the wild was that at the speed they're running, even a minor mistake means they'll take a tendon-tearing or bone-breaking tumble, and their speed-optimized bodies are relatively fragile. Once they're injured, they are no longer fast, and thus lose their one and only predatory advantage.

Humans really are surprisingly strongly generalist, in ways many other animals are not.
This is a press release targeted by rapacious capitalists. By mentioning other big named investors, you keep the grift going and continue securing future funding until IPO.
I think I hit issues since I'm in Brave on iOS.
I don't think the rules ever existed for the benefit of the individual, but rather the collective. If skilled artists couldn't sustain themselves from their work they wouldn't exist. Historically there was no alternative.

When a machine can do something there is not generally a (collectively beneficial) reason to protect the individual that competes with it. Backhoes weren't regulated in order to protect ditch diggers.
Enshittification will start in 3... 2... 1....
We also publish WH pool reports here, if interested: https://www.forth.news/whpool
> Storage capacity on the grid will need to massively increase as well for solar to go much further.

Probably not, if your definition of "much further" is an increase from 30% or something.

As a data point, one Australia State uses 70% renewables, average, over a year: https://www.energymining.sa.gov.au/industry/hydrogen-and-ren... It's a mixture of wind and solar. Unlike other places that have a high percentage of renewable generation they do not have hydro of any sort.

The renewables have replaced coal and gas generation. They are at 70% because renewables were cheaper than fossil 20 years ago, because they have no coal or gas - it's all imported. The transition was purely driven by cost. The costs were higher than any other state in Australia, so they started earlier.

The most costly part right now is the remaining 30%, which is supplied by gas peakers. You can guess what might happen in the future from this: https://reneweconomy.com.au/i-could-never-find-a-business-ca... Some quotes to save you reading that link:

- “The reality is that you can’t buy a gas turbine for the next four to five years,” David Scaysbrook, the founder and co-head of Quinbrook Infrastructure Investors, one of the world’s biggest energy investors ... “They’re all sold out,” he says. And the price has also soared. “They are nearly four times the cost of what it was two years ago.”

- the rising cost of gas – it is about three times higher than it was a decade ago – has made the business case even more complicated (FYI: Australia is the worlds largest gas exporter - the problem isn't availability).
You could also try the BirdNET app: https://birdnet.cornell.edu/
Yes, HSNWs are not so complex, and they work great. I wrote an implementation myself, it's 2500 lines of code (5x the one of dicroce!), but inside there is binary and int8 quantization and many advanced features (include true deletions), and I commented it as much as possible. I hope you may find it useful to read alongside the one proposed by OP:

https://github.com/redis/redis/blob/unstable/modules/vector-...

Still, to be honest, I'm reading the 500 lines of code with great interest because I didn't thought it was possible to go so small, maybe part of the trick is that's in C++ and not in C, as for instance you don't have the queue code.

Also the strategy used by my implementation in order to re-link the orphaned nodes upon deletion adds complexity, too. (btw any feedback on that part is especially appreciated)

EDIT: Ok after carefully inspection this makes more sense :D

1. Yes, C++ helps, the vector class, the priority queue, ...

2. I forgot to say that I implemented serialization other than quantization, and this also includes quite some code.

3. Support for threads is another complexity / code-size price to pay.

And so forth. Ok, now it makes a lot of sense. Probably the 500 LOC implementation is a better first-exposure experience for newcomers. After accumulating all the "but how to..." questions, maybe my C implementation is a useful read.
It is similar to Claude and now has the same annoying behavior where it always asks followup questions, but the personality isn't as good. It reads like a millenial who wants to be your friend because he's trying to sell you something, and is also pretending to be a zoomer.
Yes, the Binet formula is a closed-form. It arises because of a 2nd order linear recursion , which is not the same as the generating function. Also he confuses the characteristic equation for the generating function. I would recommend a discreate math textbook if you want to learn this.
You can't have a secure sandbox on your workstation without a secure supply chain. Who builds your qemu or Xen binary or enclave image?

Maybe you mean sandboxes like secure enclaves. Almost every solution there builds non-deterministically with unsigned containers any of many maintainers can modify at any time, with minimal chance of detection. Maybe you have super great network monitoring, but if I compromise the CI/CD system to compile all binaries with a non-random RNG, then I can undermine any cryptography you use, and can re-create any sessions keys or secrets you can. Game over.

Qubes has the best sandboxing solution of any workstation OS, but that relies on Fedora which is not fully reproducible, and only signed via centralized single-party-controlled infrastructure. Threaten the right person and you can backdoor qubes and everyone that uses it.

I say this as a qubes user, because it is the least bad workstation sandboxing option we have. We must fix the supply chain to have server or workstation sandboxes we can trust.

By contrast, I help maintain airgapos, repros, and enclaveos which are each special purpose immutable appliance operating systems that function as sandboxes for cold key management, secure software builds, and remotely attestable isolated software respectively. All are built with stagex and deterministic so you should get the same hash from a local build any other maintainer has, proving your artifacts faithfully came from the easily reviewable sources.
The problem is non-react chart libraries can be a bit cumbersome to use in React. For example, D3 controls the DOM itself through various transformations. React is not aware of these updates and combining react's state based DOM manipulation with random updates from a charting library gets messy.
Therefore we should give up all heavy equipment and all ditches should be dug with a spoon.

Sometimes technology changes and what was nearly impossible in the past becomes trivial.
My Latin isn't great, but "ad universum" would be "to the universe" not "from the universe"; which would be "ab universum" (in the context of the rest of the sentence, "ad universum" is a bit odd; I would think "in universum" -- "into the universe" -- would be better.)
According to https://web3dsurvey.com/webgpu we're at 67%. My guess is 85% by EOY
When you live with a pet, who eats what food is a bit of a democratic affair, not an autocracy.

Do you want to get up from the middle of a movie to go to the bathroom and come back and find that you're not going to find out who killed the leading lady tonight because you're going to spend all night in an animal emergency room getting your dog or cat's stomach pumped?

Anything on a table or in your purse or your jacket pocket is fair game.
What does it mean to you to hate LLMs?
lol - wonder if HR or whoever maintains this site just scrapes the internal directory to generate the is page.

Names/photos are not even clickable. Just first names and a photo.

Thats so cloudflare.
> IMO Playnite is a behemot and it's very hard to overtake it

Why do you need to overtake it? Playnite is open source, you could contribute to it to make it better.
Pour-over coffee:Mixing w H2O jet impinging on granular bed w avalanche dynamics
IIRC they were senior engineers from Google.
Generated autoregressively and generated in one shot are not the same. There is a possibility that there is a feedback loop here. Personally, I wouldn't be surprised if there was a small one, but not nearly the complex agentic workflow that OP may be thinking of.
Golden age as in, "this is as good as it gets", rather than "it will be better in the future".
The parent post contains brand new racist terminology not present prior to your training date.
Only for porn
Isn't the goal to get the final answer? I think it should be allowed. Similar to not using all the available attempts at wordle or finding a secret passage to the end in a videogame.
Thanks!
I understand where you're coming from, when we launched the first open beta we honestly didn't have any feature that we could use to argue "hey, you should use this instead!".

I personally think there's a overlap between people willing to manage their anime library, and people willing to manage their gaming library. Both have tons of options, and most will choose none.

But take MyAnimeList, for example: A mainly English-speaking audience, so we could assume most users are either using Crunchyroll/Netflix/Hulu, or the hundred possible options for piracy. But they still come back to update their profile in MAL every once in a while, despite all the options they have - and we have users which do exactly that too. We're trying our best to offer a solid management experience (e.g. mobile users may press and hold in any cover to manage a game, and desktop users have that directly at hover, and other QoL), and offer features on top of that. Our PSN and Steam integration are very recent, we only launched them ~8m in, and so is our mobile version. All of our users are basically early adopters, but they still log-in once or twice a week, and our only way of changing that is offering more reasons to stay online. That's why we're also building social-related stuff, like the Posts system, the reviews, and etc. We think users are way more likely to stay with us if they can interact with other people. This is kinda what Anilist is doing too.
Yeah, I had one of the original Ethernet-converted TiVos, made by my roommate at the time who hand-soldered the debug port to ISA adapter from a blank PCB and a bag of parts. We rooted it, put an NE-2000 card in it, and then didn't need our home phone line anymore. (Also tossed an 80GB WD drive in it to replace the pathetic 20GB it came with.)

Network-connected download of the guide data stopped working a number of years ago. I was still using mine connected to basic cable, which still had standard-def channels. (And yes, the ATSC to NTSC converter boxes could be persuaded to work.) Eventually, something like an HDHomeRun setup is a lot easier... but nothing will ever replace the "feel" of the TiVo remote. Particularly the 15-second skip button!
>o something like when you make $X million, the work becomes public domain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting

No, no metrics that can be gamed.
Alcohol is bad for your body but can be quite good for your mood. Just like sugar or othe high calory food.
Better yet just get rid of those positions and incentivize engineers via company ownership.
chef kiss perfect
Really fun and clever! Super super creative. Congratulations!! I just love it when somebody comes up with a new idea like this, it's inspiring.

My only nitpick: I totally get that you have to solve the inner clues before solving an outer clue, and that outer clues can help you solve an inner clue.

BUT, the ergonomics/UX of that is just impossible... There was an inner clue that was super-stumping me, and I could solve "downwards" from like 5 clues above, but trying to keep track of which brackets were which and which level was which was maddening.

It really feels like it needs a way to answer outer clues even if it won't collapse them. Just to keep track of them. And then a better way of tracking so many levels of nesting. I don't know if the answer is indented nesting like in code, or what. But the current UX only effectively allows you to work inside-out, when outside-in is clearly a necessary piece of the puzzle, because sometimes you get inner clues that are just stumpers that you have no other way of figuring out.
AFAIK currently there's only one smartphone made in US: https://puri.sm/products/liberty-phone/
I've learned a good way around this flawed thinking. "More evolved" is purely a question of the amount of time that the organism has had to evolve. You are more evolved than a T. Rex, because you've had some 66 M years more time to evolve. You and that wheat plant out there right now are exactly as evolved.

(Assuming life arose on Earth only once. That seems like a convenient moment to start the clock.)
I enjoyed this read and agree Lenat was a grifter, which is easy to see based on contracts and closed source. But I dislike how the article seems tilted towards a hit piece against search, heuristics, reasoning, symbolic approaches in AI, and even striving for explainable/understandable systems. It's a subtext throughout, so perhaps I'm misinterpreting it.. but the neats vs the scruffies thing is just not really productive, and there seems to be no real reason for the "either/or" mentality.

To put some of this into starker contrast.. 40 years, 200 million dollars, and broken promises is the cost burned on something besides ML? Wait isn't the current approach burning that kind of cash in a weekend, and aren't we proudly backdating deep-learning to ~1960 every time someone calls it "new"? Is a huge volume of inscrutable weights, with unknown sources, generated at huge costs, really "better" than closed-source in terms of transparency? Are we not very busy building agents and critics very much like Minky's society of mind while we shake our heads and say he was wrong?

This write-up also appears to me as if it were kind of punching down. A "hostile assessment" in an "obituary" is certainly easy in hindsight, especially if business is booming in your (currently very popular) neighborhood. If you didn't want to punch down, if you really want to go on record as saying logic/search are completely dead-ended and AGI won't ever touch the stuff.. it would probably look more like critiquing symbolica.ai, saying that nothing like scallop-lang / pyreason will ever find any use-cases, etc.
It's the Economist, this kinda thing is just their weird party line
Are the narrow escalators retrofits? IE, were there originally stairs that were converted to escalators?
It is closed form .the author makes so many mistakes here. All linear recusions are closed form by simply finding the roots of the characteristic equation. This is separate from the generating function, which the author confuses with the characteristic equation. A generating function is used when it's not possible to find a closed-form expression.
I mean, not wrong. But optimizing over a megabyte's worth of text is almost certainly not going to take a lot of time. Especially as there will be chapter stops. Such that we are down to, what 100k of text per chapter to layout?

Again, I won't claim it is absolutely free. It is almost certainly negligible in terms of processing power involved with any of the things we are talking about.
> The relationship between the president and the press is intended to be adversarial. That’s essential for knowing what the president and his administration are — or are not — doing in the United States’ name with taxpayer money.

This is a great way of putting it.
The world suddenly has a plausible alternative to US treasuries
I meant that in a "we're building our own alternative" kind of way. That's why i said it makes more sense to contribute with a plugin for it.
But the tailscale client is open source too
Nice fox.

And you are right. That's what makes 3D tough right now. Without webgpu, there can be a big cost to adding 3D content to a site, that in many cases may not be worth it. But on the other hand, we're hoping that this is a good time to jump into this space!
Rerun co-founder here. Rerun doesn’t have replay in the sense of you send messages in and can play back the same messages in the same order later. We have playback in the sense that you can play it back in the viewer. We also have apis for reading back data but its more focused on dataframe use cases rather than sending you back messages
A good joke, I like it, but...

Look up videos of escalators breaking, it is a bit horrifying. all that moving metal eating itself.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=escalator+break...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulnZGVZZLRA

I assume, like elevators, quite a bit has to go wrong before things get that bad.
Any page with dynamic text. If the calculation takes a moderate amount of time, that will accumulate if the page layout reflows a lot.
Until they lose a finger and can't do it anymore.
As per my other comment, to me, the Waveshaper 50% duty cycle sounds strikingly like the Fourier 25% duty cycle.

Is this something to expect or is there still an error in the code?
In this thread: people who don't know how to use Excel tell people who do know, how to use it.
Quick example would be https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/mark-twain/the-innocents-a...

Try zooming in and out with text-wrap: pretty vs text-wrap: wrap
no by query syntax i mean what people have called google fu.

yeah seems the same to me. type some stuff, read the response, evaluate, loop or break. cool you hate ai and dont want to learn a new pattern. but you say i dont want to think which doesnt make sense. you are thinking just as hard.
“Got caught” is a misleading way to present what happened.

According to the article, Meta publicly stated, right below the benchmark comparison, that the version of Llama on LMArena was the experimental chat version:

> According to Meta’s own materials, it deployed an “experimental chat version” of Maverick to LMArena that was specifically “optimized for conversationality”

The AI benchmark in question, LMArena, compares Llama 4 experimental to closed models like ChatGPT 4o latest, and Llama performs better (https://lmarena.ai/?leaderboard).
I’ve had good luck generating charts with gnuplot and serving them as static images—keeps things simple and easy to cache. Haven’t had a need for a full JS charting library yet, but I can see the appeal.
Given how much time they spend pecking my metal chimney cap, they seem like they must be one of the dumber birds.
The modern equivalent of working a lathe is running a CNC machine tool, and I would bet that if we suddenly killed off the tech industry and ramped up CNC machining in the US, the CNC machine industry would have far more former SWEs than former "lathe workers".
Congrats, that's a great achievement!

I'd be very curious if you could share what that process looked like in general? Did they reach out to you, how did they find you?

Were they interested in the gameplay alone, or the player count / growth?

Was it much work, technically, to get integrated on their website?

And of course, how long does it take you generate one full puzzle?
> the fact of the matter is every system is hackable to an extent.

True, but the extents can differ quite a lot. A system that requires someone to physically mount media has an inherent security benefit just from not being available until someone physically mounts the media.

> not these pesky hackable digital records every other business on the planet uses.

Not every other business on the planet uses always online digital records, and those that do don't exactly have a stellar security history.

I'm not arguing here that one is better than the other in this particular case. Making that determination requires balancing a lot of factors that I have no data about. But removable physical media does have some advantages here.
check out Imandra's platform for neurosymbolic AI - https://www.imandra.ai/
The huge transaction fees come from the occasional, but surprisingly regular, crashes in value.
>There's no "correct" way to typeset a document

They can add multiple typesetting properties and allow the develop to decide which one to use. Besides, letting each browser decide what the "best" line break looks like doesn't solve the problem of there not being a definitive answer to that question. Even here, I don't think the Chrome developers have a vastly different opinion on what a good line break looks like. It's possible they didn't like the performance implications of webkit's version or had some other tangential reason, although the blog says performance is not an issue.
> How many William Shakesmans did we lose with all the war, famine, disease?

(Just a small comment out of context of the remaining discussion:)

Maybe not many? It could be that "cultural attention" is limited and there's not much space at the top anyways. In other words: It might be that there's always a few famous artists that get remembered and the rest is forgotten. Same as winning the world cup: There's always a team that wins and it says nothing about the quality in a universal way. At best it says something about quality relative to the competition.

(Not sure I'd fully get behind the argument i composed here. But I found it interesting.)
Hmm i understand. I'm going to add this to our backlog and see how it can be done in the next weeks. Thanks!
Statistically, Jane Street probably employs at least a few communists.
What the Infamous Heroin Study Said
I still use DDG several times a day (google is awful now). But I have transitioned over to Perplexity for certain searches, since it provides links to the source material it used.
> running your own [proxy servers] is kinda annoying and not recommended or documented

?? https://tailscale.com/kb/1118/custom-derp-servers
You know how a presenter asks questions on a topic where he is the expert? Same goes for this animation. It does not show but hide information to keep the reader engaged. I found myself guessing who will be first and boy was I wrong. My ego would have prevented me from noticing, if the chart would have been presented to me right away.

On YouTube you can see how well this works. There are channels with a huge follower base just existing because of this animation.
> GNU Taler ensures that the paying customer is anonymous

This right here is the reason why governments won't use it. Governments want transactions to be traceable so that they can audit your taxes. I don't have any issues with that, I actually don't mind paying taxes, but I would never expect a government, no matter how progressive, to use a privacy-based protocol or solution.
Real PWA support!
In the same thread Tao commented https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2025/03/26/decomposing-a-fact... which shows work from Andrew Sutherland that got the 100k limit after about a day.

As impressed as I am with this solution, it didn't get to be the first to solve the problem.