skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
... I don't know.

Many people are in accidents that are entirely not their fault, e.g. being rear-ended. You can't do anything about those who drive unsafely, distracted, under the influence, etc.

Assuming you have a "good" driver, there are still plenty of times they might be into accidents for reasons that aren't because of awareness. For example, road conditions, behavior of other drivers, and just normal, honest mistakes.

At least for me, my own sense aren't really the limiting factor in my safety. My eyes are good enough. Modern cars have the equivalent of bowling lane bumpers with auto-centering, pre-collision warning, and blind spot warning/indicators.
For Linux, Foliate is very nice.
I am not sure this would haves worked since the return of the US stock market was quite high (due to that constant influx of foreign investment notably) compared to any other asset for people/businesses that wanted to invest their profit.

Also due to the reserve nature of the USD the dollar and international trade mostly done in USD there is a huge demand for dollars keeping it strong compared to other currencies. This fundamentally is at odd with an export driven economy.
The compilerbook link is broken in multiple ways, but www.compilerbook.com redirects to https://www3.nd.edu/~dthain/compilerbook/
Which could work if there were domestic alternatives or the capacity to produce domestic alternatives. The US lacks the apparel manufacturing capacity to takeover from the countries being hit with the current very high tariffs. We also lack the environmental factors to take over growing (ignoring the years needed to get started) coffee and vanilla and many other agricultural products.
>They could be invaluable at any company in a month.

That's a made up fantasy. They wouldn't get hired at all in real life. Ask me how I know. Where I live recruiters only check that your recent experience and stack match the ones on the job, otherwise your resume goes in the bin.

Like Ygg2 said below, employers don't want generalists with generic CS knowledge, they want people they can immediately slot in and start crushing Jira tickets.
The emergency is "I wanna".
Imagine if you could only see in a very narrow portion of the visible light spectrum, like only green or something. That's kind of how radar "sees" (I'm grossly over-simplifying here but point is it doesn't see the way we do).

It's hard to tell something sticking off the back of a truck or a motorcycle behind a vehicle without false positive triggering off of other stuff and panic braking at dumb times, something early systems (generically, not any particular OEM) were known for, which is why they were mostly limited to warnings not actual braking.

And while one can make bad faith comments all day about that not technically being the fault of the system doing the braking allowing such systems to proliferate would be a big class action lawsuit, and maybe even a revision of how liability is handled, waiting to happen.
If your threat model needs to include “I’m (going to be) a target of major nation-state intelligence community agencies” then it’s safest to assume none of this is going to prevent them getting your data?

James Mickens covered this at Monitorama 2014 in a humorous way. https://vimeo.com/95066828 (16:30)
Hate to break it to you, but gender is not an immutable/normative property defined forever at birth, it's a mutable/descriptive property evaluated in context. For example, in the year of our lord 2025, Hunter Schafer is a woman, with no ifs, ands, or buts.
You can set default margins in the user interface of KOReader too.
thank you for your considered response
The greatest surprise is that no popular web browser opens ePubs natively! This in 2025, where they all display PDFs, high resolution video, 3D games, etc.
Firestore client with JSON editing and custom queries
This reply makes even less sense than assuming that YouTube is an alternative to regulatory testing and approval.
Nope still the same thing: all AI is insecure, you cant put untrusted unconfirmed text from anyone in through a secure airlock and let it run wild.

The answer is you need complete control over the text blob on the secure side, but then.... none of this works so throw it in the trash already
Do you want more portable than bytecode with a dynamic compiler? Apparenty the greatest thing on Earth as per WebAssembly folks.

As for AOT compilation, there have been multiple approaches since the early days, and the latest, Native AOT is good enough for everything required to write a TypeScript compiler, including better WebAssembly support than the Go compiler, thanks to Blazor infrastructure.
I calculated this with some degree of rigor as a VERY conservative estimate of their ad revenue from me. THAT came out to more like $3 and I just adjusted for inflation this time around.

I don't really recall the details of that calculation unfortunately. But it would have been based on cost per ad view (no clicks) times the number I expect to be shown in a month.

The model I'm suggesting would be more like I load YouTube up with $10 and slowly burn through it as I view videos instead of being shown ads. The cost per view could actually be just as or even more transparent. Perhaps videos are tagged with the cost to view, which could open up a whole new world of economy among creators to gatekeep with higher fees themselves if they want to value their videos at more than the default. Being transparent on pricing this way is literally using the exact same infrastructure they already use to price ads, just letting me pay the cost instead of the advertisers.
Tariffs are an additional sales tax.

That's it. That's all you need to do to explain this to people. It's amazing to me how many have fallen for this ridiculous lie that the other country somehow pays the tariff AND there will be no increase in cost to the consumer.

I used to think these lies were cynical, like how Mexico was going to pay for the border wall. But I'm not convinced now. I think there's a not-insgificant chance the president doesn't know this is how tariffs work. And that's terrifying. I would respect a cycnical lie way more.

You buy $1000 in t-shirts from China. The government places a 30% import duty on them. The importer pays $300 to the government. Those t-shirts now cost you $1300. Whoever sells them retail will be charging up to 30% extra to recoup that. It blows my mind that this even requires explanation.
I'm not sure I follow. Traditional computing does allow us to make this distinction, and allows us to control the scenarios when we don't want this distinction, and when we have software that doesn't implement such rules appropriately we consider it a security vulnerability.

We're just treating LLMs and agents different because we're focused on making them powerful, and there is basically no way to make the distinction with an LLM. Doesn't change the fact that we wouldn't have this problem with a traditional approach.
> Wait until you realize that the EU tariff on American cars has been 4x the US tariff in EU cars for awhile.

Can you share the specifics of this lets say end of 2024?

I could find for example:
EU has 10% on cars from US while US has 2.5% in general and 25% on pickup trucks. Important to note in USA the pickup trucks market is the biggest one vs mid size being the biggest one in EU.

When looking at it it seems to me that both entities wants to protect their biggest markets: EU with only 10% protecting midsize and USA with 25% their pickup trucks.
Typing in listings from magazines for my 48k Sinclair ZX Spectrum. Debugging them (there were almost always misprints or genuine coding mistakes) taught me a lot.
Same criticism. When the program is in the middle of busy runtime activity, with all the memory that entails, it's the worst time to also load up the parser.
Why do you consider Clojure a failure in the Java ecosystem?
The difference with the 737 Max crashes is that there was only one sensor feeding data to the system, not two. If there's a discrepancy between the two sensors, disconnect the automation and let the human take control. And unlike planes, you can safely stop a car in almost all scenarios.
Not as far as anyone is aware. There were massive archiving efforts running leading up to the shutdown. One archive reproduced the directory tree and most GeoCities links could be replaced with reocities and simply worked.

I think the main bulk of the archives for slurped into the internet archive. I don't know if any of the independent GeoCities archives are still online, but everything that was saved should be in the IA by now.
Linux also has Landlock now.

macOS sandboxing is notoriously under-documented, has sharp edges, and is nowhere near as expressive as Linux sandboxing.
I mean it's estimated that 1/5th of Russians have no access to indoor plumbing.

This is a country where its leader/president/dictator/mafia don/caporegime is quite literally a multitrillionaire.

Russia asking for sanctions relief is just relieving pressure for Putin as the people who keep him in power (the oligarchs) need access to the money they've stolen and want to be able to buy more yachts and football teams. Putin and his circle, as well as the oligarch class, don't give a fuck about the average Russian.
> "Don't like it? Here is a full refund and you are free to read some other version."

That is not at all what I said.

> You can't claim to care about preserving the works while changing them, and that is changing them.

We do not and have never made that claim. We are creating our own editions of these public domain books, not engaging in historical preservation.

If you want to read classic books in their original spelling, then you must locate first editions. Editors and publishers have updated both spelling and punctuation as a matter of course for centuries. Just look at any three editions of any Jane Austen novel - and you could never read an edition of Shakespeare more recent than 1800.
I spent so much time typing in the Star Trek game from that book into a Commodore Pet, and then so much time playing the game. Hunt the Wumpus as well. Good times
I wonder if I should point out that your link says that it's when people stop being paid that quality declines. However, if "ads for ads' sake" became a thing, it would presumably look like propaganda, in support of whatever the advert-artist personally cares about.
I just think this is an unreasonably charitable way to frame the observation. "The machine" identified, in Trump's first term, that many of the policies he wanted to implement would be bad for the country or would violate the law. It's true that moving more quickly and chaotically provides fewer opportunities for people to identify and mitigate the problems in advance - but that's not good, even for someone who wants big changes, unless you view causing problems in and of itself as a good thing. (In that vein, I should note that Trump shared a video last week from a guy saying he intentionally crashed the stock market.)
Interesting point. I hadn't thought of it this way before:

> But imagine that the Japanese both want to get out of their U.S. real estate
and entirely away from dollar assets. They can’t accomplish that by selling their
real estate to Americans, because they will get paid in dollars. And if they sell
their real estate to non-Americans—say, the French, for euros—the property will
remain in the hands of foreigners. With either kind of sale, the dollar assets held by the rest of the world will not (except for any concurrent shift in the price of the dollar) have changed.

> The bottom line is that other nations simply can’t disinvest in the U.S. unless
they, as a universe, buy more goods and services from us than we buy from
them. That state of affairs would be called an American trade surplus, and we
don’t have one.

> But under any realistic view of things, our huge trade
deficit guarantees that the rest of the world must not only hold the American
assets it owns but consistently add to them. And that’s why, of course, our
national net worth is gradually shifting away from our shores.
Because Napster didn't have the Chinese breathing down its neck? :)
Guess what: Musk will probably get this rewuirement scrapped by his orange mate.

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/trump-...
There's a related write-up here you might find interesting: https://wandb.ai/learning-at-home/LM_OWT/reports/Parameter-s...

It covers some experiments on weight tying, one of which is actually LoRA and random weights.
I think this is old news, but this model does better than llama 4 maverick on coding.
If Tesla is Level 2, that link doesn’t support the OPs point about “all” incidents, but rather only those involved in a fatality, hospital treatment, airbag deployment, or towed vehicle. Am I reading that link correctly?
This is exactly why I don't trust FSD in stop and go traffic. The follow distance is too close on some versions where it will accelerate hard and start braking around 10 feet. One misstep and that's a rear end. The latest version is better, where I feel more confident with it's easing, but there's constantly regressions where it goes back to an aggressive braking where I'm always afraid it'll rear end the other driver.
My understanding is that the loopholes exist because international trade exists and therefore capital can be juggled through various different states to avoid the tax payments. That is, it's outside the legislative scope of any single set of law makers.
Trunk whines that American cars aren’t bought in. Europe. Americans cars are “big as bars”, a “compact” is larger than my “big car”, let alone the small one. Their trucks literally won’t fit down the road.
Are you using something like Pipecat or the VAPI API? How are you handling your voice->voice pipeline and your audio infra?
According to Musk, my car was supposed to be unsupervised driving by now. The shift to vision only has consumed all of their resources for the past several years, and my car has been left behind. There have been giant leaps in vision only, but it still isn't better than the vision+radar.

So, I was deceived. I didn't buy the car because of the deception, but I did buy FSD because of it.

Also, FSD disengaging when it gets sensor confusion should be considered criminal fraud. FSD should never disengage without a driver action.
> Also due to the reserve nature of the USD the dollar and international trade mostly done in USD there is a huge demand for dollars keeping it strong compared to other currencies. This fundamentally is at odd with an export driven economy.

What if the Dollar weren't the world's reserve currency, either due to deliberate policy by the U.S., or the inevitable fact that the U.S. economy will shrink as a share of the world's economy as India and China develop?
That’s calibre viewer, but it may require some customization to get something nice. Foliate is ok, but it’s a library. i’d say that’s OK because epub is a zip file and you need to extract it to read it.
I've always asked for better non-monetary things in writing: title, spot on the org chart, automatic promotion soon, which parts of the product and stack I will work on, even as trivial as whether my desk will have a window. I state with constant certainty that those things are more important to me than a bigger paycheck. Most of the time I was offered far more money (in one case, 2 years pay signing bonus) in return for my agreeing to accept an offer with none of those things in writing.
Bulk mail should be banned, yeah.
I love dokku (and Jose is amazing!). I would also love to know what's different.

The only thing I'm unsure of after reading the comments is that coolify can migrate to another server using a GUI. If that's correct, I don't know how to do it with dokku. But given that it is merely a small, secure and REALLY thoughtful shim over docker, I can imagine doing that myself in a few commands.

I absolutely love dokku so I'm biased but willing to learn.
If I understand this correctly, it would effectively be the same mechanism as carbon offset credits where carbon emitters can purchase credits from entities working to reduce carbon emissions.

I think that there could be some downsides to this because the US exports a lot of agricultural goods which are already subsidized as it is.
Backing this up: automotive radar uses a band at ~80 GHz. The wavelength is ~3.7 millimeters, which lets you get incredible resolution. Not quite as good as the TSA airport scanners that can count your moles through your shirt, but good enough to see anything bigger than a golf ball.

For a long, long time automotive radar was a pipe dream technology. Steering a phased array of antennas means delaying each antenna by 1/10,000s of a wave period. Dynamically steering means being able to adjust those timings![1] You're approaching picosecond timing, and doing that with 10s or 100s antennas. Reading that data stream is still beyond affordable technology. Sampling 100 antennas 10x per period at 16 bit precision is 160 terabytes per second, 100x more data than the best high speed cameras. Since the fourier transform is O(nlogn), that's tens of petaflops to transform. Hundreds of 5090s, fully maxed out, before running object recognition.

Obviously we cut some corners instead. Current techniques way underutilize the potential of 80 GHz. Processing power trickles down slowly and new methods are created unpredictably, but improvement is happening. IMO radar has the highest ceiling potential of any of the sensing methods, it's the cheapest, and it's the most resistant to interference from other vehicles. Lidar can't hop frequencies or do any of the things we do to multiplex radar.

[1]: In reality you don't scan left-right-up-down like that. You don't even use just an 80 GHz wave, or even just a chirp (a pulsing wave that oscillates between 77-80 GHz). You direct different beams in all different directions at the same time, and more importantly you listen from all different directions at the same time.
> Well, Fox News is is probably one of the most influential sources of propaganda in our era, and they're just publishing news with a strong political slant.

Actually (and hilariously) Fox News according to their own court filings do not publish news, they are an entertainment product.

And I say ironically because that's exactly the mechanism people are clamoring for in this discussion: it's the courts. Lawyers argue and courts eventually decide definitions all the time, because it's highly impractical to belabor and endlessly debate passing new laws because we don't have ironclad definitions in them beforehand.

If you want my humble opinion, in a legal/ban sense, I would define advertising as:

> Communicative material that is placed strategically by publishers or media for a price/by way of other agreement to drive awareness of products or services with the intent to generate attention and sales of said products or services.
rather than using tons of expensive hall effect sensors, why not just use a long force sensing linear potentiometer, like other digital instruments in the category (such as Yamaha's Otamatone)?
Sensationalist headlining. Article headline is: "U.S. Space Force awards $13.7 billion in new national security launch contracts to Blue Origin, SpaceX and ULA"
Surprisingly middlebrow.
I think it is basically a garbage collector, just one that operates on a per-function level instead of at the general level of the program
Reconstructing the Knuth-Morris-Pratt Algorithm
Absolutely terrible.

The foundations of economics are built on school boy style maths errors.

They have famous "paradoxes" and results that are just bad maths.

It's a ridiculous joke of a research field.
This whole balancing the trade deficit is utopia.

I will just give a small example using black leather jackets.

Black leather jackets are indestructible, you can spill any sort of fluid on them, try to light them on fire (they won't catch fire) throw them in the dirt etc.

They never go out of style either, there is basically no reason why an adult should own more than one black leather jacket.

Now think of how many black leather jackets do you own.

See? People have to find within themselves the will to stop their consumerism , not with this sort of central planning idiocy. And it's not granted that doing away with consumerism is desirable either.

Like for example Trump's impact on American society was much better when he was buying planes, yachts, supercars and foreign models than what it has become of him now that he has stopped pursuing those things.
lol the same guy that wrote this bs article https://fuelarc.com/tech/self-driving-tesla-crashes-into-wal...
I fear that Congress will be unable to pass anything that isn't a budget resolution for the foreseeable future.

The filibuster rule requires bipartisan agreement to implement any proposed policy, and neither party wants to give an administration from the other party any kind of win.

Perversely, the better the idea, the less likely it is to pass Congress.

Better idea -> it will be successful -> it will be popular -> the administration will benefit politically -> the other party will oppose it -> it won't get 60 votes in the Senate -> it won't become law
Didn’t see that there was a theme at first, and I think after trying some of the other dates having that theme makes it too easy
The current state of the government is that Congress has tacitly ceded their power to the President. They are allowing him to do things that generally would not be permitted with out Congressional approval, because the majority is aligned with him anyway.

An intelligent or competent leader who had the power currently enjoyed by the President would be able to implement the system suggested by Buffet, and it would likely see less opposition than the current tariffs have.
if you didn't debug, you'd have to wait a week and hope they'd print a correction
This is such an insanely good and important idea, that it feels inevitable that we'll eventually do it, probably in the next decades/centuries.

Probably one of the hardest new laws we'll ever have to implement.
If the URL claiming uploaded in 2015 can be believed (i.e. in the time before the Internet was 95% sewage), this could be that original article: https://www.gettingclear.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Body...

It's much more fucking concise than the drivel of the republished stuff.
The US will probably keep adjusting its tariffs to make sure it is the supposed cheat, so a better move is to give it as little real value as possible for your quota.
Finally some good criticism in this godforsaken thread. Yes, Elon wants to do corruption and we should oppose him.
but train tracks is not that kind of edge case, tbh, it's so vanishingly situational
Pedagogy of the Oppressed would unironically be a better suggestion than half the books on the list.
My Dad was a software developer in the UK with Honeywell in the 1960s and after a stint with Wang (yes, I know, ha ha) went independent. As a result we had a variety of Wang minis in the house in the mid-70s when I was a toddler, which must have been fairly unusual. I learnt to write on green-banded continuous stationery!

Thereafter it was the more conventional British route into computing via Clive Sinclair's cheap but, er, cheap, ZX81 for me... but those minis lit the fuse.
Considering the thrust of my comment, I don't understand the question. Obviously paraphrasing someone else's words into ones you like better is a fine and acceptable thing to do. So clearly I am just illustrating the problem by example.

The real answer is twofold.

1. We don't have a special 3rd kind of quote or other punctuation mark for reinterpreted references.

2. The real one: This is not a quote that lies as you imply. It is a new message, that merely uses quotes to denote a speaker, as in a pure fictional work, where the characters dialog is in quotes, even though no actual human was actually quoted.

Are there any other conundrums and baffling mysteries I can clear up for you?