skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If this is even really going to be a thing I highly doubt 15+ year old games are going to be the Priority
If you look at the history of fraud, people are always coming up with new ways to steal from people that are at the margins of legality. Consider the category "wire fraud", for example. It's not like some lawmakers looked at the nascent telephone and the telegraph and said, "Well boys, we'd better make sure these aren't used for crime." No, innovative scammers found ways to use the new technology for new crime for a few decades before the laws were updated. See Joesph "The Yellow Kid" Weil's autobiography for some examples.

Just because the fraud or theft isn't at the moment illegal doesn't meant it isn't fraud or theft.
I have approximately zero sympathy for companies in this situation. They've done everything possible to quash worker's rights, collude on wages, and commit billions in wage theft against the very poorest of workers.

As they say, "Turnabout is fair play".
John,

On one hand sure China can sell products to the rest of the world.

In the extreme case where trade was cut off completely between the US and China who will buy the over $500 billion in goods China previously sold to the United States?

Brazil? They have tariffs on electronic products. The EU? I just linked an article where the EU is already asking China to stop shipments that would have been bound for the US or face tariffs on those goods. South East Asia? Japan? Korea? Neither of those countries are going to allow Chinese companies to outcompete their manufacturing sectors. I'm just not sure who exactly has the appetite or money for these goods.

On the other hand, why exactly is the US not just able to buy desired goods from other markets? They may be more expensive due to the tariffs in some or many cases, but it's not like the US can't buy iPhones made in India or instead of buying t-shirts made by Chinese subsidiaries in Vietnam you buy them actually made in the United States. Germany has to sell Mercedes Benz. What happens when the EU says "no thanks" to their automobile manufacturers being beat by Chinese ones in the European market?

The main argument I've seen made online is basically "prices go up", and I think that can cause a political change, but economically I don't find it to be that compelling. I also find it generally disingenuous that there's a spirit of the US is the sole bad guy here. Donald Trump (who I didn't vote for) is an a-hole, but that doesn't mean other countries weren't engaging in unfair or protectionist trade policies either, nor does it mean they will stop or won't protect their manufacturing bases from Chinese competition.
I think part of your challenge here is that the idea of system exploration kind of applies to almost everything a software engineer or data scientist does and while the demo material makes it clear that you can use Gtk for that kind of thing, its kind of hard to think specifically, at this moment, what one might use it for, because the problem space is so general and it seems like Gtk is maybe also very general, which means there is a little bit of work to apply it to a particular problem right out of the gate.

I find myself wanting to talk about this in more detail, but this account is anonymous - could I email you?
What part of "tech products of Ukraine" was unclear?
It looks amazing but I wish we could stop playing silly games with benchmarks. Why compare fp8 performance in ironwood to architectures which don't support fp8 in hardware? Why leave out TPUv6 in the comparison?

Why compare fp64 flops in the El Capitan supercomputer to fp8 flops in the TPU pod when you know full well these are not comparable?

[Edit: it turns out that El Capitan is actually faster when compared like for like and the statement below underestimated how much slower fp64 is, my original comment in italics below is not accurate] (The TPU would still be faster even allowing for the fact fp64 is ~8x harder than fp8. Is it worthwhile to misleadingly claim it's 24x faster instead of honestly saying it's 3x faster? Really?)

It comes across as a bit cheap. Using misleading statements is a tactic for snake oil salesmen. This isn't snake oil so why lower yourself?
I have no problem with people's attitudes or culture changing in a positive direction. However, I dislike this business of introducing a change into the language in a way that reduces its expressiveness and clarity. Usage of singular 'they' in contexts where more specific pronouns were available was unusual until very recently. Why the change? I don't think it's unfair characterize this as an offensive move, waged by one side in a 'culture war', that was done without regard to collateral damage.
Lol yea this mostly worked out for cases where just a few chapters were assigned.
Wow, this is pretty cool. I work in radio and with these devices. If anyone is curious, sound devices is everyones favourite, zoom f3 is the new workhorse on the block and the sony pcm d100 is the old discontinued legend… all three in top 11, which tells me it’s not all talk and we in the industry actually can somewhat tell what sounds good.
Violating an employment contract is not a criminal issue, it is a civil issue at best.

The most they can realistically do to you for violating that section is just firing you. I don’t see them trying to collect the “damages” in the civil court.
Opening up trade with Red China was supposed to make them more democratic. It didn't. (This talking point has long been forgotten of course).

If it's bad for the PRC it's fine with me.
Makes sense. I learnt swift recently with LLM as my first starting point - basically "I know java and python, explain swift syntax". It was great.

Once I got to architecture I got a general direction and relied on googling (eg. Lots of nuance to if I should use swiftData/coreData/sqlite etc found in conversation threads)
I'm guessing it didn't work? It doesn't sound like it worked for this guy, either.
Gen Z is the most susceptible generation but also the most self-aware about their susceptibility. I'm not entirely sure what to make of that but for some reason it seems fitting.

Edit - Gen Z is defined as those born from 1997 to 2012. But all participants are 18 or older. Hmm.

I took the test[0] and it seems rather biased. The fake headlines seem to be targeting conservative biases and blind spots in particular, e.g.

> Left-Wing Extremism Causes 'More Damage' to World Than Terrorism, Says UN Report

or

> New Study: Left-Wingers Are More Likely to Lie to Get a Higher Salary

I don't find it all that surprising that people find criticism of their opposition more believable. I would be curious to compare results with a test that had the opposite tilt, i.e. replace 'left-winger' with 'right-winger' and so on.

[0] https://yourmist.streamlit.app
Introducing Docker Model Runner
> Japan and Korea will absolutely introduce retaliatory tariffs

I really doubt about this, but I will wait to see
They should be going after digital and financial services
> Hiring a software engineer can be significantly simplified with A2A collaboration

Why not abstract away the applicant altogether, outsourcing the search for talent that make these very systems tick. Let the candidate microtrading really take off, there's always a better candidate in the pipeline after all
Looking at partners of this effort, I wonder what problems does A2A create to serve as a solution.
I've worked with several excellent Ukrainian developers, but in each case they were working for consulting firms in other Eastern European countries.
The conclusion shouldn’t be about choosing a wise or moral leader, that’s an unknown and not a guarantee whether someone will remain wise.

The conclusion ought to be that the executive shouldn’t have such powers.

DOGE is also an example of this. No clue whether for the better or worse. But the mechanism being used was put in place by Obama during affordable care act overhauls, as part of USDS (US digital services).
On macOS you can format the man pages into a PostScript which can be distilled into a PDF by Preview and then opened there. PDFs do support links for cross references. On Linux you can do the same except you will probably need to manually install ghostscript for the distillation and evince or something similar to view it.

This should not surprise anyone because roff is originally designed to be a typesetting tool and the man pages are naturally printable as a nicely formatted document.
If you were able to demand higher prices even with lower demand, you would demand higher prices.

In other words: It doesn't work like that. They might want to try to make up for the loss, but they have to compete with other manufacturers, some of whom will be desperate to make up the sales at lower prices.
> Hard disagree. Markdown is the way to go.

As other child comments have stated, this is entirely subjective, and many would disagree with you (myself included). I live primarily in the terminal, and the ability to seamlessly look up syntax, flags, features, etc. without ever leaving the keyboard is wonderful. Additionally, I agree with milesrout that I do not want emoji, animations, etc. in my manuals (nor my terminal). I want searchable text. I also agree with lupusreal that having a single large page, at least as an option, is ideal.

A perfect example of the two approaches is HAProxy. Here [0] is their commercial site. It's very flashy, modern web, etc. I don't necessarily hate it, but it's definitely designed to get the attention who may not necessarily know what they want, and can be sold to. In comparison, here [1] is their community site. It is extremely Web 1.0, and I love it. Everything you need, nothing you don't. Similarly, their docs [2] are [3] logically [4] split, and manage to be readable, navigable, yet information-dense. I don't need a tutorial with code snippets every few paragraphs in my docs.

> Additionally, developers are very much used to markdown, and most other docs are written in markdown (maybe some RST, but probably mostly markdown) so this is not great for the person writing the docs either.

Web devs, perhaps, though I imagine there's more variety than you think. Kernel devs likely do not have the same opinion as you (though I do not wish to speak for them, as I am not a kernel dev). I've seen the same argument against the build and packaging process for Linux distros, like Debian. "Why is so much of this in Perl," "why are there so many bash scripts," etc. Because that is what the original developers wrote it in, it works well, and at this point is largely bug-free. Drastically changing something to suit the tastes of some at the risk of introducing errors is not a reasonable strategy.

[0]: https://www.haproxy.com

[1]: https://www.haproxy.org

[2]: https://docs.haproxy.org/3.1/intro.html

[3]: https://docs.haproxy.org/3.1/configuration.html

[4]: https://docs.haproxy.org/3.1/management.html
Because they don't want your password and as a security company, I applaud that.

Account issues, recovery, support that can be manipulated, a single breach or bad password that grants access to their admin interfaces, implementing their own 2FA.

And, serious people want SSO anyway, and most people have some kind of authentication they can lean on.

You can make a stodgy password login if you want, or you can run a keycloak yourself.

If you don't want to run an OIDC provider for yourself, why would you want them to?

Genuinely I applaud the idea that they're SSO first, and have as little information as possible to handle things. If you don't like it; well, run your own, run headscale - or, use wireguard another way.

Not every company needs their own login system. I fucking hate it.
Fake job ads, fake job applicants...I'm starting to think I was accidentally prescient when I found my bookbinding hobby a few years back.

Oh, they're nothing fancy, just perfect-bound with card covers and spines hand-lettered in silver paint on black bookbinder's tape. But they're workmanlike and sturdy and sound in the hand, and maybe it'll be worth someone's value to own words that not only have obviously been labored over at length, but that never change even when no one is looking at them.

Why not, I suppose. Printed words are already becoming a luxury, with the decline in material and workmanship in modern hardbound "prestige" editions reflecting their place among the economy of aspirational, status- and status-anxiety-signaling goods. Obviously I would have no market among these dreary neoliberal bourgeoisie, but I'm sure there are a few perverts on websites like this one who'd pay more for the produce of hours in an attic over hand tools and muttered swears, for something that even if it's just a trade paperback still feels and reads the way a book should.
Well US started this, so it is fair to be anti-American (someone voted an idiot into the office) for breaking the world economy.

First being pro-Russian and making demands to Ukraine and now those tariffs.

Trump keeps on giving.
<cough>Thoughtworks</cough>
Notably, the EU proposed a zero-tariffs free-trade agreement to the US in February, and again a few days ago after the reciprocal-tariffs announcement. Trump rejected the proposal, presumably because it wouldn’t remove the US trade deficit.
Explanation makes a lot of sense. Good to see the next generation opting out of thankless work early.
I haven't done the deep dive into the details of this - it seems difficult to test at this point because everyone in the US has fluoride - but given that it repeatedly is raised for decades, why not have a few US states remove fluoride as a controlled test and we see what happens in a decade or two?

I think that yes, more cavities but dentists can fix this, but it would be interesting to see the results on IQ, etc during that time. I think that large scale tests are the only way to move forward because it seems many groups in the US do not accept any other evidence.

So let them experiment on themselves?
Spin Rig v0.1: Simulating Gravity with a Sock and a Phone
You may in fact decide to explicitly never monetize it, which is a perfectly reasonable decision.

You may also find that there are ways of setting the thing up so that you aren't paid (at least not right now if it's not convenient to be paid) but the thing is able to collect money and use that money to do $RANDOM_BUSINESS_THINGS like pay for hosting and maybe eventually hire a developer...

It's likely that this is all really simple stuff, to someone who knows exactly how thing work in $LOCAL_LEGAL_REGIME
I like pinfo for this (although it is primarily intended for viewing GNU Info pages, it can also display man pages): https://github.com/baszoetekouw/pinfo

Using it feels a lot like lynx. It recognizes cross-references between pages and allows you to navigate through them, as the author of this post requests.
> But now that they're here, I just sort of poke at it for a minute and carry on with my day.

Well, that's because they suck, despite all the hype.

They have a use in a professional context, i.e., as replacement for older models and algorithms like BERT or TF/IDF.

But as assistants they're only good as a novelty gag.
I think it depends on what you want to make a clone for.

TGM rules are more elegant and much more challenging for single-player tetris, but on the other hand multiplayer and especially 1v1 has far greater variety and dynamism with a looser rotation system. The stricter the rules, the more it becomes spamming tetrises against each other until someone misdrops. You have to construct a ruleset where a player who is 0.1pps faster doesn't just autowin.
Let's compare UK and USA electricity prices.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/263492/electricity-price...

It seems that something is not working that great in the UK...
Your housing analogy is incomplete and inaccurate.

Imagine that I overhear you wanting that home but I front run you. Not because I also love that house, I just buy it because I heard you like it and so that you can't have it. I don't do anything with the house. I don't live in it. I don't consider the house to have any value other than you wanting it.

That's not the same thing as 2 home buyers appreciating hot property.
I'm not sure that would work in the long run. Fallout 3 came out in 2008 and is no longer actively maintained. Even if Apple could convince developers to port to macOS/Apple Silicon the games will, at some point in the future, stop working because most games are not being maintained long after release and Apple is fine with breaking compatibility.
As with so many things here, the remedy for the executive just pulling some nonsense must be sought through the courts. That remedy is being sought, notably by affected businesses. Trump will simply argue that there is a security concern here, or something like that.

The courts, as usual, will first decide which outcome they prefer. They will then try to find some reasoning that will give them that outcome without looking too foolish. The latter step is easy in this case, but it's at least plausible that the courts don't want to crash the global economy. So it could go either way.

Regardless, this is likely to take a while. Courts are slow, especially on contentious issues.

It's also possible that the executive just tries to ignore an unfavorable ruling, as they have already done in other instances; nobody really knows what will happen in that eventuality...
Er...I'm not saying engineers are smarter than bankers. I'm just saying "smart" is a bit of too broad of a word.

And I'm just following the original logic, so I don't see what's wrong here. If you are not happy about the conclusion, I politely point to the original post/reply.
i am wondering, how would that even work for any subsequent jobs, past the first set of multiple jobs done at once?

A pre-employment background check (which you typically do after accepting an offer and right before starting the job) would clearly show all your previous places of employment (for up to 7 years at the very least), along with the timelines. How would one explain that to the employer?
surtout 6m50+ mdr
Great Another acronym to put on your resume with 5 years of experience
The irony isn't lost on me how employers will post ghost positions, and use automation to sort through applications faster. While at the same time condemning automation from the applicant side, even if the automation is used in good faith.
I'm always torn on this, on one hand there are companies that are so inept that they really only need people 4-10 hours per week, and they are happy with that.

On the other hand, I am the hiring manager at a healthcare company and I have to layoff 1-2 people per year who do this. I know all the tell tale signs, random blocks on calendar, missing meetings, sudden health issues when there are production incidents, getting stuck on simple problems for days at a time. Of course you can always back it up by looking at their stats (staring at Microsoft teams 4-5 hours a day).
Honestly, haven’t seen many like this. But I think it’s totally fine. The vibe is different...
The person I responded to did not cared about China situation or self-harm - they analyzed it only in terms of how America responds. Note that the risk of "and America will attack us more and more" was not present at all. The risks were expressed only in terms of "China will not succeed in fixing America". Which, I really do not think is China goal at all anyway.

> Even The Economist said the most 'rational' response from Europe was not to impose counter-tariffs, but simply continue on as best they could without them and let the majority of the pain fall on the US.

Isn't it always the pattern with Trump and conservatives in general? The most rational person is supposed to let them bully you without response. Again and again and it never works. Their aggression and harm they cause is just going up with each cycle. And it is because what is conventionally called "rational" in this context amounts to "be nice submissive enabler else their actions are your fault".

American tariffs are made in fairly dumb way. They still harm Europe, China and everyone else great deal. Surely it is possible to create reciprocal tariffs that will actually harm America more. Even America could have done tariffs in smarter way. And the sooner Trump supporters are actually harmed, the sooner harm to Europe stops.
Your pain is a sacrifice they are willing to make.
Did you watch the video? Do you have opinions on it? On MCP? On A2A? What is a title of youtube video and a link to it supposed to add here? Just start a new submission if you just want to link to it.
Nobody else is engaging in the punitive tariff rates the US is imposing, so the rest of the world is economically more attractive than the US on the score. I don't see how China will be more hurt by this than the US.

Everyone will be hurt, of course, which is one of the reasons why the US starting this trade war is insanity.

> that doesn't mean other countries weren't engaging in unfair or protectionist trade policies either

True, although Trump massively overstates how much of this is actually happening. However, there are numerous ways to address this that don't involve self-harm. We're just choosing not to do them.

Also, the US engages in these practices as much as everyone else. There's more than a whiff of the pot calling the kettle black here.
What DOGE is doing to US Social Security should be all over every News Organizations. But it is not because these new orgs are afraid of Trump.

I have said it before, these DOGE people, Musk should all be in Court or on their way to federal prison due to all the data they are illegally mining.
I've experienced this, but not often enough that it feels like a significant barrier.
Never imagine that Trump tariffs would end creating a new drinking game.
Venezuela definitely has an absolutely massive amount of oil in the ground still. I'm not sure about trusted proven reserve numbers and relative rankings, but its definitely up there.

However, Venezuela's oil is a good bit harder to refine than Saudi oil which is just about the simplest oil to refine. The US controls most of the good refineries (and related technologies) to effectively refine Venezuela's oil, but the US doesn't tend to trade much with Venezuela (lots of history to read there).

So yes, Venezuela has a lot of oil, but it is oil most of the world's refineries don't want to/can't deal with.

As a note, this is also a part of the reason why even though the US is a net exporter of oil we still import a ton of oil. We've got good refineries for processing the cheap difficult to handle stuff most of the world doesn't want to touch (largely because we built it designed to handle Venezuela's oil) and we export stuff that's the "fancy" stuff easy to refine pretty much everywhere.

There's a lot of nuance I'm glazing over there. Read up more about the history of US-Venezuela oil trade, it is quite a history.
Vibe Coding Starter Pack: 3D Multiplayer
Ha, yes, agree. How many trips to the office should it take to prove you are real meat?
Wine's WoW64 build can run 32 bit Windows binaries. Apple's support for running 32 bit macOS binaries isn't relevant for running 32 bit Windows binaries, as long as Wine itself is 64 bit and calls 64 bit system libraries.

The more pressing concern is the eventual removal of Rosetta 2. It hasn't been announced so far, but it's unlikely that Apple will keep maintaining it forever.
Email is your electronic memory (2018)
Maybe if the price difference does indeed lead to more oil used.

Lower prices might be good for countries like Germany to stockpile for Winter (so oil & gas they'd already use anyways) while hurting producers that rely on it being a high price to be profitable.

Less profitable may lead to less investment in oil development while wind, solar, and other means become more prevalent.
As always, Republicans are their own best argument for limited federal government.
>The NPV of a saving accounts above inflation viewed as a perpetuity is infinite

um... no. and it's just PV, there's no net.

look at the pattern of cash flows