skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The rich might be more exposed to stock market fluctuations, but they are fundamentally in a better place to leverage the changes in the market to either improve or at the very least maintain their position.

The real impact will be felt by the people on the lowest end of the financial wealth scale.

If the price of food, energy, clothing, housing, appliances, etc goes up - that means a lot more to those with the lowest wealth. The more wealthy you are, the less that is going to have a direct impact on you.

If this were "eating the rich" then we'd see direct taxation or asset seizing from the wealthy, not raising of tariffs.
only the 401k people (i think bessent called them that).

young malcontents voting antiwoke, rich people with more than enough, seniors counting down to social security, feds who are vested in gov pension plans, genuine have nots.

none of this matters to them in any material way.
It's scary that there seems to be no off ramp. The massive incompetence of the administration is absolutely appalling. Let suppose they decide to keep the tariffs until the actual lagged economic metrics are showing the stress on jobs and companies earnings. That means an absolutely insane amount of goods will go up in price between 10% and 50% in just a couple of weeks (depending how much the company margins are going to be absorbing the hike). The direct impact is probably a proportional amount of suppressed consumption so direct impact on the top line and bottom line of all those firms. This does not even account for all the effects of retaliation which are not yet decided. The markets were trading with lofty multipliers that were including quite a bit of revenue growth assumptions. All that is gone now! Without a quick change of course, the valuations will still have to go down a lot...
Of course the wealthy stand to lose more, in relative terms. Lifestyle creep is real and expensive. However, they wont have trouble maintaining a baseline quality of life: getting jobs (if they need to), getting food on the table, paying for healthcare, and covering property costs . The poor and middle class, on the other hand, may not have as much to lose in lifestyle because they couldn't afford it anyway and they do stand to lost of quality of life if they are squeezed.
Model Error
I guess you missed the word "modern"? Or are you saying you actually know of one?
My 2022 Volkswagen e-Up has zero thermal management of the battery, it's completely passively cooled with no heating. Not that it really matters, people have tested it and charging speed only starts to degrade after 3-4 rapid charges in one day, with "rapid" in quotes(in tops out at 40kW).

I believe the eGolf which was sold in the US shares the same drivetrain and battery.
Typically the way it goes is that the studio underplays how much CGI they used during the marketing campaign, while the VFX vendors are forced to bite their tongues, and then 6 months after the movie debuts their NDA expires and they finally get to show how much CGI there really was. This series is a great watch on the subject:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ttG90raCNo

In the later parts there's some really egregious examples where promotional behind-the-scenes footage was actually doctored to key out the green screens or present composited shots as if they were done in-camera.
It's not "people" who are saying this, it's the official position of the Secretary of Commerce. "The president needs to reset global trade."
Dr. Todd Grande on Dallas LeBeau

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_ODEyyP1Z8
In your opinion, what is the ebook reader you like the most ?
America’s consumer economy isn’t sustainable anyways. Once China figures out tech and India takes American services, America has nothing. These tariffs are stupid, but it’s either now or later. Better figure it out now, I suppose.

people who think america will indefinitely have tech supremacy are unbelievably delusional. once tech is lost, america has what exactly (it’ll be like the UK - rich, but a shell of its former self)? look at SPY gains since year 2000. almost all of it has been due to tech. trump is one of the dumbest famous people of all time, but this was going to happen one way or another. better it happen sooner.
Chords lying on the ground sounds like a good album
Well, at that point you deserve it :)
For what gain ?
Yes, but not having a copy of the source code for ATT Unix stopped everyone from using BSD or any system based on BSD till 1991. Again, before then BSD was very far from being a complete OS.

So BSD has severe shortcomings as an answer to the question that started this thread, namely, "Can you show examples of impactful open software that predates fsf and stallman?"
I thought Bessent was one of the architects of this tariff plan?
When not being a Florida politician, Mike Waltz has had this role since the early 2000s (for Cheney) and believes contact fields “get sucked” through invisible series of tubes. He’s never seen a Senate confirmation and I bet never will.
One factor that the media has missed is that the "dork right" who support trump have the bitcoin put option.

Elect trump -> his crazy ideas work -> stonks go up -> get rich

Elect trump -> his crazy ideas destroy USA -> USD collapses -> BTC goes to infinity -> get rich
I can’t reproduce. Maybe others reported the error and someone adjusted the expected answer, I do not know enough about OpenAI operations to say for sure.

The reason this bothers me is that comments like this reinforce the believes of people that could otherwise find value in these tools.

But I think points like this would be better made in shared chats or screenshots, since we do not have something like a core dump or stacktrace to attach.

And while I am not saying OP did this, I have seen technically skilled engineers asserting/implying that llm/chatbots aren’t good or not useful to them look at their chat log that a multitude of topics that I am sure would impact the result of the query.

Yes. It can be an UX problem. Yes. It can be an algorithmc problem.
But they are just tools that can be used wrong and not a perfect mechanical brain.
By the GNU website it would be sufficient. The website says:

> GPLv3 stops tivoization by requiring the distributor to provide you with whatever information or data is necessary to install modified software on the device

By my reading of this, there is not a requirement that the operating system is unlocked, but the device. Being able to install an alternate operating system should meet the requirement to "install modified software on the device."

> This may be as simple as a set of instructions, or it may include special data such as cryptographic keys or information about how to bypass an integrity check in the hardware.

As you've mentioned with disabling SSV, and as Asahi Linux has shown, Apple Silicon hardware can run 3rd party operating systems without any problems.
Perplexity and open-webui+ollama in web search mode answer this question correctly.
this is top notch commentary
My job is to point out why people are wrong. I won't outright accuse people of not reading the post and using an LLM to reply. Whether they are really bad at commenting, or they are using an LLM (and it is really bad at commenting), I don't really care: the outcome is the same. Both are pretty embarrassing.
Interesting case if we are the “ants” and it is our 3 dims happen to be compact looping somewhere beyond our event horizon. Multitude of Universes in that garden hose in which gravity can be falling as cube or more while at small scale if our compact Universe we’ll see square, and only very precise measurements may notice a bit larger than square.

Another possibility is if our brane has a lot of folds coming close/touching - that would make gravity there stronger like say that dark matter idea inducing rotation speed curve of the disk stars.
There's plenty of Norwegians on YouTube testing EVs down to those kinds of temperatures and they work absolutely fine, with the caveat that they won't charge until the battery warms up. Discharging Lithium batteries at really low temperatures isn't an issue, charging them is(because it actively damages them) - but even then the threshold is -32C or around that, easily overcome even with a simple resistive heater.
> or around 5 years after Stallman started the GNU project.

So 5 years after he started with an empty repo and some political ramblings?

GNU did not have a working system until Linus released Linux in 1992. They had pieces and components which were worthless on their own.

There is a lot of deliberate ignorance of public domain code being posted on BBSes at the time. I'm not discounting anything Richard did but let's not rewrite history here.
The whole process from this administration doesn't seem the least bit thought out and nobody with any economic education / background is explaining what is supposed to happen.

According to insiders in the white house the tariffs came about from a 3 hour meeting, there's nobody willing say no to the old man who can't keep his thoughts or words together sometimes ... and regarding environmental problems IIRC he has already expressed "I'll be dead by then". I wonder if that is his approach to everything?

In some ways this feels like the country has been brought along on some senile old man's suicide pact.
Sahil seemed to join the tech startup sphere around the time I did, back in ~2009 when he was making iPhone apps. I remember beta-testing one of his apps on my first iPhone at the age of 17, I can't imagine he was much older.

He's always been a hustler, and I don't mean that in an entirely negative or positive way. He exemplifies startup hustle culture in a way that I sometimes envy for his ability to move quickly and churn out new things, but that comes at a cost. The cost is integrity, morals, resolution, whatever you want to call it. He's a mercenary with no particular loyalty.

Gumroad has a scandal every year or two, and they're always based on jumping on the latest bandwagon. The company itself was formed in the creator hype phase that birthed Patreon and Kickstarter, it has seemingly had a full reset (i.e. layoffs back to just Sahil) twice, once when they failed to make it big, once again when layoffs were cool. That he is on the LLM hype, in a hype-driven way rather than an actually effective way, is no surprise. And lastly that he has "open-sourced" the codebase again comes across as a cynical move rather than one done for the right reasons.

All this is to say that Sahil joining DOGE is entirely on brand, both in the sense of DOGE being the epitome of the worst of startup hustle culture (we can solve every problem from first principles with some shitty code, screw actual experience!), and in the sense that this is the next bandwagon that will make him cool. Like Zuckerberg, I think Sahil is just another insecure nerd who prioritises addressing that insecurity over standing up for themselves and their beliefs.
He was supposed to be. But he was clearly left out of the loop - look for interviews with him from the Liberation Day. He cleary had no clue what just happend and was very nervous.
This is a very charitable explanation. There's a much likelier one; Trump is literally doing what he thinks is right and smart.

Of course, he's wrong, but nobody with the power to stop him is willing to call him out on it yet. It will probably take a lot of pain before they do (they being Congress).
BTC is a risk asset owned by US institutions, so that won't happen. It's basically another version of QQQ.
he won’t reverse them without capitulation. trump has been obsessed with tariffs for decades now, even before being a politician
Humans can survive for several minutes without oxygen as well.
What i want to know is how long does it take for this kind of dip to show up in real estate prices -- there's a certain amount of loss in that sector (not all that large) before the downward trend in asset prices becomes self-accelerating -- unless banks and lenders put in policies to actively avoid putting out margin calls and the like
That happened in 2020 because everyone was so traumatized they forgot who was president then, but I don't think it will always happen.
Oh definitely those too. Pressurized and maximum ceiling make a big difference in a lot of areas where you need the altitude or performance.
That "good friend of the POTUS" has everything to lose if the economy tanks. Tesla is far from insulated from the rest of the market, same with his other ventures. There's no way he's happy about this.
>I seriously doubt Elon likes that Europe will enact retaliatory tariffs on Tesla car imports, halving his market overnight.

Elon is so blasted on drugs and his own fawning internet echo-chamber maga apologists I don't think he's capable of thinking that far.
Going to yandex.com and looking for Navalny gives results.. so too for "Putin's palace", Navalny's team's documentary about the regime's corruption (links to navalny.com and medusa.io).

Isn't Yandex a Dutch-based company now? Then again, searching from within Russia might give different results...

Try using Facebook Messenger to send a link to PirateBay; it's blocked. I find it disgusting that our communication media is controlled by billionaires who've revealed themselves as fuckwits on Jan 20. The same dislike is there for corporations controlling what we can find online... Then again, I really don't mind YouTube refusing the hosting of videos from Covid conspiracy nutters (yes I could be wrong and they could be right, but I guess like every other nutjob, I'm comfortable in my ignorance pretending to be confidence.)
Certainly makes me want to give up participating in this stupid economy when one man his billionaire lackeys can crush years of hard work and savings.

It’s really infuriating.
Yeah, I saw that. I was just looking at a chart of the yield over the last year. The yield has dropped below where it was for most of the last 12 months, besides a less than three month period from late July to early October last year. If Bessent is listening to people like Dalio though, he may be wanting the yield to go down below 3%, which is what I think Dalio said was necessary to avoid a debt spiral.
What a pathetic attempt at spinning manifestly stupid policy:

> @elonmusk & @DOGE are cutting $4B per day. At that pace, they’d shave off $1 trillion by end of Sep 25 (if not May).

Actual economists (of any political persuasion) are not giving Trump the benefit of the doubt, only grifters like this "thought leader".
> openrsync is written as part of the rpki-client(1) project, an RPKI validator for OpenBSD. openrsync was funded by NetNod, IIS.SE, SUNET and 6connect.

Could anyone suggest why these organizations would want to fund this development?

https://github.com/kristapsdz/openrsync?tab=readme-ov-file#p...
Unfortunately impossible to know because dependent on a bunch of factors that are outside rationality. If the tariffs are scaled back tomorrow, probably the damage would be pretty limited but it's not looking like anybody reasonable is around or in charge...
Every crisis is a wealth redistribution. I'm a Dave Ramsey _and_ a Warren Buffett fan, so when my favourite shoes are half price, I run to buy them (Ramsey on stock exchange falling), and from Buffett: "the stock market is designed to transfer money from the active to the patient".

I think I get that DJT wants to do (I live in the EU so I didn't vote for neither). Stocks are going down? VOO/VOOG/etc. going down? Good! My (small) monthly investment will buy 'so much' more. And when 'that thing' rebounds then even better.

In cases like that I feel sorry for the people who have to 'close'/sell their assets because they want to buy a house (why do people put it in the markets if they want their money out in less than 1-2 years?), or are retiring (no need to sell everything, sell small and slowly - it will rebound) and drops like this, or the COVID-time drops mess their plans.
man, maybe the US shouldn't have let the supply chain move to asia so our upper 10% could get rich and especially our upper 1% could get really rich and especially especially our upper .1% could get super-duper rich, oh well, too bad nobody said that back then and were laughed off the national stage
Not sure what you mean about ubuntu… there is tons of GPL there. https://ubuntu.com/legal/open-source-licences?release=jammy
Gives DOGE full credit for claimed savings. Quietly corrects an off by factor of 10 error on the savings from reduced yields at the end of the thread.
Well China did build that capability from scratch over ~50 years; the US does have the advantage that it probably has most of the experience...somewhere; what it needs if it really wants to do it is pull all that together into something streamlined and build up capacity in those bits it doesn't have much of.

(Not that I'm saying this crazy sudden tariff mechanism is a good way to get that to happen; heck even if you wanted to do it, you wouldn't have to dump the entire lot on everyone in one day)
Also range from map should allow entering ICAO designators.
and who tried instituting tariff regime then too (only back then there were still a few grown up in the room back then to put limits in place)
We could integrate expiry dates for emails after which they get deleted. That's feasible.
That would admit being wrong and would be political suicide for these people. They’re going to go all the way.
Public officials should not own stocks full stop.
This is surprising and cool. What's the explanation for why there are NFC transmissions on unlock or wake?
It might crash, or it might work as naively expected, or it might do something else.

For example, clang started simply omitting writes to data it knows to be read-only (which is allowed because these writes are undefined behavior, so anything goes). See this example[1]: `writable()` will return "*ello", but `readonly()` will just return "hello" and not crash (note its assembly doesn't include a write).

[1] https://godbolt.org/z/MboK3hTPx
True. There’s a small bonus that trying to explain the issue to the llm may sometimes be essentially rubber ducking, and that can lead to insights. I feel most of the time the llm can give erroneous output that still might trigger some thinking on a different direction, and sometimes I’m inclined to think it’s helping me more than it actually is.
That's not even crap data - that's archived data that might be useful someday (though de-dupe is probably a great idea and email sigs are definitely wasteful trash) - most of the crap data is things that would never have been useful under any circumstances.

I have cleaned up dozens of product databases in cost management efforts and have found anywhere from 50-99% of data stored in product databases is crap, because they are not well managed and any single mistake can lead to a huge outsized impact on storage.

What to log all those http requests for just a day? Might as well turn that on for all time...
Doesn’t matter. If using this and I send you an email, and my account disappears, you can no longer read the email you received because it’s merely a link to read something from my account on Google.
> [...] But I would nevertheless like to submit, based off of internal benchmarks, and my own and colleagues' perceptions using these models, that whatever gains these companies are reporting to the public, they are not reflective of economic usefulness or generality. [...]

Seems like they're looking at how they fail and not considering how they're improving in how they succeed.

The efficiency in DeepSeek's Multi-Head Latent Attention[0] is pure advancement.

[0] https://youtu.be/0VLAoVGf_74?si=1YEIHST8yfl2qoGY&t=816
To not like GPLv3 one has be a DRM proponent. That checks out for Apple.

In practice though authors of GPLv3 see it as a clarification of GPLv2, i.e. they should have the same practical intent.
> This regularly drives C++ programmers mad

I thought the C++ language did that.
Sure, that particular prompt is ambiguous. Feel free to imagine it to be more of an informational question, even one asking for just yes/no.

However, when people are talking about the "critical flaw" in LLMs, of which this "tool shadowing" attack is an example of, they're talking about how the LLMs cannot differentiate between text that is supposed to give them instructions and text that is supposed to be just for reference.

Concretely, today, ask an LLM "when was Elvis born", something in your MCP stack might be poisoning the LLM content window and causing another MCP tool to leak your SSH keys. I don't think you can argue that the user intended for that.
One of the reasons white collar is desirable is the physical toll that work over a lifetime can take on a persons body. So, in one sense, it could be perceived as a better deal. Whether it actually is or not is another thing.

Chinese industry is not known for caring overly much about the long term effects on the bodies of their workers. They have more.

And yes, I find it scary to think of what the world is competing with in China. It is hard to compete with their brutal workforce ethics (or lack thereof) and as they seem to be getting well on top of technology too the future is theirs it seems.
It's their goal, but rather than the typical approach of 'starving the beast' they're just shooting the beast in broad daylight on 5th street. Which I think makes it much harder to ignore the person holding the gun. Outside of the full cult sycophants.
Every day I am more convinced that LLM hype is the equivalent of someone seeing a stage magician levitate a table across the stage and assuming this means hovercars must only be a few years away.
And the U.S. Treasury Secretary is saying he has nothing to do with this: https://youtu.be/YjVlsMGQTb0?t=296
because the country cant manage the debt, and us equity growth is partly due to rampant government spending, not true growth
yes but this is a dual objective move
Many EVs (Teslas) already contain a heat pump to warm the battery. I presume that improved battery chemistry would supplement this -- but maybe replacement would be possible?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyGgrkeds5U
Like so many security gestures from Big Tech, it’s a win wrapped in a curse (or lock-in, tracking, what have you depending on the solution. )
Some reasons to involve a VC no longer exist. You will get an adviser and someone with a network and skin in the game, both strong reasons - but thinking of some others:

There was a time when capital was needed to hire an army of devs, rack a ton of servers, and when startup patterns were less established & more experimental.

Now you can use open source libraries, get advice from podcasts, build your CRUD with AI, and follow well worn paths to success. Amazing what small focused teams can do!
The homeless problem, rampant petty crime, and the school district are why I will never move my family into SF. Life is much better further down the peninsula.
Indeed, there’s nothing at all wrong with sharing anecdotes. The problem is when people make broad assumptions and conclusions based solely on personal experience, which unfortunately happens all too often. Doing so is wired into our brains, though, and we have to work very consciously to intercept our survival instincts.
BTC/USD is down as we speak 6% around 78k... if anything the riskier the asset the more downside there is