skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You could say that about many other European countries though. Outside of the capitals life is different. Wealth always centralises around capitals. It’s literally called a capital city.
Except that you can't get by if the other person is an authority figure and the imperfection is throwing you under the bus.

Your statement makes no sense in the context you're answering to.
This is not how "responsible" works for companies like Lego and Disney. They consider everything around their brand to be 'theirs'. An interesting story in that area [1] is the one time that Disney did try to build something resembling chat into a game of theirs (spoiler: it didn't go well).

[1] http://habitatchronicles.com/2007/03/the-untold-history-of-t...
>The big 5 providers have enough money to hire/poach some scraping/indexing experts. [...]

>I get that it could be incompetence in one or two places, but as far as I know all the big providers fail here...

Is there any indication that the scraping traffic is from the "the big providers"? The article doesn't mention this.
A drowning child is of fairly limited threat to an even halfway competent adult swimmer. Even at maximum panic/flailing, they just don't have the mass or strength to prevent you from at least treading water.
I'm a big fan of this app! I've been using it to catch up on March Madness when I've been too busy to watch it live on TV. This is the future of sports consumption!
consider this

for (let i=0;i<3;i++) {
i+=10;
setTimeout(_=>console.log(i),30);
i-=10
}

Capture by value would print 10, 11, 12 that's the value when it was captured

Capture by reference would print 0,1,2

It's much easier to conceptualise it as

for (const i=0;i<3;i++) {
setTimeout(_=>console.log(i),30);
}

which is fine because i never changes. It is a different i each time.

fancier example

for (let x = 0, y = 0; y < 2; x=x++<3?x:y++,0){
x+=10;
y+=10;
console.log("inline:",x,y);
setTimeout(_=>console.log("timeout",x,y),30);
x-=10;
y-=10;
}
YouTube Shorts Are Like Crack
Don't really know why this comment got downvoted. Are you serious?
Understanding Hydration Errors by Building a SSR React Project
It's a step towards winning.
I don't think they have a strategy.

These aren't people who care about the national debt. Trump has not only stated, but bragged publicly, that he does what he can to pay as little in tax as possible. He's had an appeal in front of the IRS for probably over a decade now for writing down the value of a business loss (the casino in Atlantic City, IIRC) that he received monetary gain from.

That's not what you do when you see a financial issue as a threat to the nation you supposedly love. They are too short-sighted to have a strategy.

If there's a depression or major recession, I don't think the government bailout would be the main concern. Civil unrest would be. I'm in my early 30s and I've seen four major financial crises (2002, 2008, 2020, and now 2025) in my lifetime. I'm doing alright because I come from a place of privilege. There are literally millions of people my age who aren't going to be doing alright in the situation you describe, and there's a good chance they would see that as the death knell of their hopes and dreams, all because of the shareholder and political classes in this country.
I wonder if it's a similar case with having tv shows running in the background? Music is often too stimulating for me but I like having the TV running in the background cycling through tv shows.
In most EU countries it is very hard to reach a doctor in decent time unless you can afford to pay a lot.

So you can suffer for weeks with an infection and high fever because the pharmacies won't sell you antibiotics because you don't have a paper from a doctor.
The nutritional information label that lists the calories in the food? What is the point of that?
Let's ignore the hype and marketing and truly consider LLM as the first stage of "something". The truth is that I've heard a lot of speculation, but no inching towards any of the speculated objective on a practical scale.

For anything else, any such first stage was usually constrained on a very small scale while the glaring issues were ironed out. Now a lot of us are being forced to tolerate what is essentially a prototype or toy in tools and systems that were fine before.
Would Rorschach have been bored of it?
I think the pessimism of the British is part of it, and as I have said before, the British have a rosy tinted view of the rest of the world. They compare to UK to the nice bits of other developed countries that they visit on holidays and business.
Read the excerpt I posted in this thread from Project 2025. Hope that gives you a clear perspective of the plan

Edit: typo
"In large cities" is very much a sweeping generalisation. What you're describing sounds a lot like it's caused by broken window syndrome; people put rubbish everywhere because there's no good trash collection system (I know in the UK people have to pay for it, so they just dump it in nature instead. Collect it from people's doorsteps for free and fly tipping wouldn't be nearly as big an issue anymore.

Vandalism is a difficult one. But it's likely because the people doing it don't have anything better to do, no hobbies, jobs, families, responsibilities, etc. And also, broken window syndrome.

But then you look at e.g. east or southeast asia and they have things like neat closed off bus stops with heating and you're like, "Why can't we have nice things?". We're stuck with glass booths with a beam for leaning against at best. Glass so that people in there are visible and don't use it as a public toilet, uncomfortable seating so people don't use it as a hang-out or sleeping spot. But the design adapts to a problem, one which the government has little interest in fixing - or which would infringe on people's rights.
Thanks for letting us know everything is fine, just in case we get confused and think the opposite.
This is such because the US has a First-Past-the-Post system, which encourages only two parties.

Things like Ranked Choice Voting change the dynamics. Some states have implemented this. I think AK & ME.
It's frankly sickening that some people heap scorn upon the Britain of their ancestors, especially considering they're the only ones that actually you know, abolished slavery and had the seeds of thought in its WEIRD Protestantism that evolved into the strain of progressivism that you masochistic westerners hold dear.
My favorite quirk, which they recently did away with, was in Google docs and sheets. They made a custom right click menu that had it's own Copy and Paste buttons. If you tried to use these "Copy / Paste" options, a full page popup would appear telling you to "Use Ctrl + C / V instead".

So someone at Google was unsatisfied with the system right click options, so they remade them. Then someone else at Google probably thought that was dumb and put the popup to remind people that Ctrl + C / V is better? I don't know, all I want to do is move data. But now I have to confront this issue, which takes me away from my actual problem and makes me process some new information that is completely irrelevant. And besides, I already pressed the button. Why didn't you respect that button press? Why did you give me the option to press that button if you didn't want me to use it?

Thanks Google.
Maybe if China was willing to buy anything else but opium, that never would have happened. China's exports were in hot demand and they would only transact in silver but wouldn't buy anything to return that silver supply to global markets. It was causing massive problems in the silver market with over 40% of the yearly global supply going directly to purchasing Chinese exports.

Trade imbalances like that always lead to war. historically.
You gotta hope.
The "tables" feature supported by Google Sheets and Excel is similar, but definitely not the same thing. Tables in those programs just ascribe special meaning to specified ranges of a single shared row:column space (what one would otherwise be tempted to call a "table") that defaults to behaving as effectively infinite.

In Numbers, you have multiple tables that are entirely separate row:column spaces that can be resized and positioned arbitrarily and independently, with small finite extent by default such that they fit on screen. That UI makes the capability to have multiple tables on one sheet more discoverable, and easier to comprehend what it's doing. When you drag and drop a CSV file onto a Numbers sheet, it creates a new table rather than populating cells in an existing table. When you resize column A in one table, it doesn't affect the column A of any other table.

That finite vs seemingly-infinite distinction is a fundamental difference in conceptualizing what a spreadsheet is, which can have pretty far-reaching consequences. I've encountered programs with a "CSV export" feature that generates a CSV file that's more or less what you'd expect to get if you wrote a report in a single Excel sheet, and then exported that to CSV: you get a file that contains tabular data embedded in it, but so polluted with unrelated text and unstructured metadata that having it as CSV format barely helps with parsing and you'd be better off trying to extract data from HTML.
Trump 1 also had no plan and most there were for their own gain in money or power, so they were ineffective and got barely nothing done. Trump 2 has the Project 2025/Curtis Yarvin plan and plenty of competent people to execute it. They prepared a shitload of executive orders and set up a system where sycophants can upload their CV to take government jobs when they fire people.

After he won I started reading more about who these people were and what they were planning to do and sold all my stocks after the inauguration, there was no way it was going to be a normal presidency, even compared to the last one.
>It seems like the tech industry has become just like any other industry that has gotten entrenched, and today’s tech leaders simply don’t inspire me like how the leaders of previous eras did. Today’s Web media companies are far scarier than 1990’s Microsoft ever was.

Three letters: MBA

When the MBA's came into the tech industry everything got stale, 'safe' and unexciting as they want to leech their fucking hands over everything in the name of maximal profit.

Private Equity follows MBAs so you see more PE firms getting into tech during the same period. Same story, fucking leeches leeching makes the leeches happy at the expense of society. In fact, it seems PE firms and MBA grads love making the world an actively terrible place

I hate business bros. They ruin god damn everything.
Don't the numbers speak for themselves?

£80k a year works out at £4,166.14 per month (assuming plan 2 student loan and 0 pension contributions).

Full time minimum wage works out at £25,397.00 per year or £1,819.48 per month (assuming no student loan or pension contributions).

That works out as a difference of £2,346.66 per month. It's plausible the cost difference between social housing and private rent for a 3 bed in Westminster could make up that difference alone.

Westminister social housing is obviously a favourable case, but we also have to consider benefits:

In the scenario of 2 kids on that min wage salary it seems like you'd get £34.15 per month in universal credit.

Whilst small on its own, the universal credit status unlocks many other benefits and perks. Potential discounts of up to 100% of council tax could be possible depending on local authority (avg council tax in London is £157.75 per month). The NHS low income scheme can be accessed: getting free prescriptions and support with health travel. Another big thing would be getting access to social tariffs on energies and utilities. Together these could add up to hundreds of pounds per month.

The min wage worker would also child benefit at £187.17 monthly.
What are his talents?
Well the BBC mostly are reporting and have to be very careful what they say due to neutrality laws governing them. However, tune in to Question Time and you will hear these voices.
There is an abundance of discussion on this thread about whether models are intelligent or not.

This binary is an utter waste of time.

Instead focus on the gradient of intelligence - the set of cognitive skills any given system has and to what degree it has them.

This engineering approach is more likely to lead to practical utility and progress.

The view of intelligence as binary is incredibly corrosive to this field.
I’m not sure what you mean by “the West” in this context. No one besides the US are unilaterally raising tariffs on China. The US stands alone in this and the rest of us are fine to keep trading with China while whatever agenda is being pursued by the US regime.
To be fair, Franco is the only Spanish leader most people (or at least most non-Spaniards) can even name
This picture without context gave me QA or build lab type vibes, and the caption in the story confirmed that. They had to test on all kinds of configurations and hardware, so this makes sense- tbh I am surprised its this small. Remote tools didn't really exist in those days, and even if they did, they are unlikely to work if the OS is having issues. So you run a test, find an issue, and if its hard to reproduce you might just have to bring the dev into the lab to get on the box to understand what happened.

It looks very similar to a QA Lab at a place I worked at in the early 2000s. They essentially commandeered a larger conference room and there were just (cpu) boxes everywhere.
> we'll have to find another way

You agree it is a problem, then. What are some solutions you can think of? I'm not convinced the gain is worth the pain, but maybe you have some ideas for me to think about.
So every year I go to a swap meet and try to exchange my “expiring” belongings for something similar to reset the clock? Or, they get taken away by force? By someone who has meticulous records of all my stuff?

What problem are you trying to solve?
That's awesome! Any particular or interesting memories from your AIX development days you remember?

I've never worked with Microchannel in person (yet), but it's a pretty cool technology. Kind of like a pre-PCI interface.
What is killing people's work ethic in your opinion then?

How is that person in Japan paid? Are they able to live comfortably and not have to worry about whether they are going to be bankrupted by an unexpected medical problem or bill?

From my perspective, A major problem in the west is that it has become unaffordable for so many people and they are always stressed about money which permeates into the rest of their life. If you are always on the precipice of being homeless it is understandable why they are stressed and able to be exploited by predatory companies working them to the bone.
The information in most ads is things like: "Skinny beautiful people are worthy of love and use this brand of makeup". Or "good parents who love their children go to Disney World". Or "it's a rugged and cool type of person that buys a Jeep".

The type of ads that do what you're taking about are sought out. People willingly watch Nintendo Directs.
Steelmanning this: You take your phone out and snap a picture and it gets added to a running total without typing into a tiny keyboard or doing any math. You consult your total next time you're thinking of eating.

Critiquing: You still need to figure out serving sizes - it's going to need to ask how many servings. Nutrition labels also aren't available for any number of things.
I live in Cheshire. Definitely not poor. I used to live in Warwickshire. Not poor either.
Does ownership of the cards matter at all? Are these cards lent out for grading?
Lovely idea and implementation, Waiting for Slavic languages.
It's not an opinion poll. People vote to try and get their desired outcome. If someone views their preferred minor candidate as a lost cause in electoral terms, they won't bother going to vote because it won't make any difference to the outcome. Or, worse, there isn't a single candidate on the list in their district who shares their views.
> Seriously, what does one really expect from an unethical convicted criminal?

I expected a repeat of his first term. Which honestly was quite uneventful. This is not.
Apologies for implying you are claiming to be an expert software engineer: I took the "senior" in the title and "25 years of experience" in the post to mean similar things as "expert".

I don't doubt this is doing something useful for you. It might even be mostly correct.

But it is not a positive advertisement for what AI can do: just like the code is objectively crap, you can't easily trust the output without a comprehensive review. And without doubting your expertise, I don't think you reviewed it, or you would have caught the same smells I did.

What this article tells me is that when the task is sufficiently non-critical that you can ignore being perfectly correct, you can steer AI coding assistants into producing some garbage code that very well might work or appear to work (when you are making stats, those are tricky even with utmost manual care).

Which is amazing, in my opinion!

But not what the premise seems to be (how a senior will make it do something very nice with decent quality code).

Out of curiosity why did you not build this tool in a language you generally use?
There's a lot of ways to get at least a surface level understanding of the general affluence of an area.

How well upkept are the buildings? Are they clean and well maintained or are they dingy and broken with overgrowth? Are there a lot of open shops around? Do people seem to be buying things? What kind of clothes are the people wearing? Does it seem like many people are homeless? How is the state of the transit (both public and private?) Do people feel the need to have bars on their windows and security stationed around to prevent theft, or do storefronts feel safe enough to even have merchandise sitting out? Are people eating in restaurants? Are those expensive or cheap restaurants? Do people seem to be comfortable spending a night out on the town, going to bars and shows or are the streets empty because people can't afford outside entertainment?
> It’s a battle between people who think we can do both, better; and people who seriously believe that a bat tunnel is the best way to spend £120m to support wildlife, a proposition for which no compelling evidence has ever been provided.

Nobody believes that about the bat tunnel. HS2 designed the most expensive thing they could think of because that maximises the profit. They say Natural England approved it but why wouldn't they? In a non-government project the contractors would negotiate with Natural England to agree on the cheapest thing that complied with the law. HS2 presented the most expensive thing and said can we do this? And they got the answer they wanted.
People who develop software have to understand the difference between FOSS and Open-Source. We already have a term for what you want to describe as open-source, it's called FOSS.

Words have meanings they're collected and recorded in dictionaries, these are the source of truth for the definition of words. It's important that we have them so we can all talk and know what we mean. This is at the very core of languages.

This open source has to be FOSS is some straight-up bullshit by people who spend all their time in the FOSS community.

By every definition other than the FOSS community, this is open source. That is a fact.

Btw: FOSS means Free and Open Source Software. Even the FOSS community fundamentally says that open source does not neet to be free.
People have also spent lifetimes perfecting the art of painting, putting years of effort in, and then used those talents to... Make sellable copies of the Mona Lisa. Ironically, since copyright has a time limit, that's not even illegal (so long as they do not claim they're original works of da Vinci). Nor is photographing it and selling the photograph. I'm not sure what argument you're making given the observations you've made (other than, perhaps, "There is a big gap between the mechanics of copyright and what it's supposed to accomplish," which I'd agree with).
OCaml in Space: SpaceOS Is on a Satellite
The same way they responded to ignoring of the 14th? The Supreme court will provide some travesty justification and that'll be it.
Blaming difficulty of problems on capitalism alone is disingenuous. There are huge scientific projects that are not profitable and still done because there is a somehow clearer path forward (ex: UKBioBank, CERN, ITER).

When I hear "{x} is not very profitable" I think people mean "we are not sure if we succeed doing {x} and it requires us to divert lots of resources from other things that we think would be more useful".

Pharma companies invest already huge amounts in drugs and many fail anyhow. Quote: "It takes 10 to 15 years and around US$1 billion to develop one successful drug. Despite these significant investments in time and money, 90% of drug candidates in clinical trials fail." (https://www.asbmb.org/asbmb-today/opinions/031222/90-of-drug...)
The British people certainly didn't make a lot of money from that. One person did.

But blaming whole countries for the actions of single entrepreneurs has been the MO for a very long time now, so I can see how you feel correct making that statement
Wasn't there a famous Brit who declared that there is no such thing as society ? If the commons has more or less been willed out of existence, should its decay surprise ?
Yeah, if you already have elasticsearch running it's a good choice. Most people are not going to have that or want to run and maintain elasticsearch though. Reasonable decisions for your situation though!
There are snakes. And there are vicious snakes. And then there is Boris Johnson.

It looks like (just like everywhere else in the world) the rich become waaaayy richer and the rest are taxed/inflated to death.
It's not that a house that 'was priced' at GBO 200k is 20 years ago is worth GBP 1.5m.
It's not that a house that is 20 years older than before has turned to gold and its value has grown.
It is the constant devaluation of the GBP. Brexit simply accelerated an already bad situation.
I still wait for Boris Johnson and his team to show us the GBP 350m per week to be redirected to the NHS.

I think that "you will own nothing and be happy" is happening in the UK already with below 35 to never own property (unless inherit it) and by then they have to sell it to have a 'modern' lifestyle.
To allow the sender to set the TTL, right? Without adding another field to the packet header.

If you count up from zero, then you'd also have to include in every packet how high it can go, so that a router has enough info to decide if the packet is still live. Otherwise every connection in the network would have to share the same fixed TTL, or obey the TTL set in whatever random routers it goes through. If you count down, you're always checking against zero.