skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I wish the graphic driver could be better as playing Youtube videos constantly crashes Firefox on Ubuntu

Do you have the xf86-video-intel driver installed? Try removing that package and just relying on the kernel modesetting DRI driver instead. That's been the recommended way to run Intel graphics for long time now.

I don't know if that's your issue, but it this caused a lot of weird issues on my x270 with Firefox.
Are you aware the article you link to technically critiques MTProto 1, including links to web archives of the MTProto 1 docs?

> MTProto's main issues are not the teething issues of the yester-years. It's the fact every chat is sent to the server that can then read the messages. Telegram only has E2EE in internet debates about it's non-existent E2EE in practice.

Telegram does in fact have E2EE available in the form of Secret Chats, so that's just an incorrect statement from you.

Regardless, that wasn't what I was rebutting. If anyone is going to have a reasonable debate about Telegram's problems, at least do so reasonably, without resorting to well-worn and facile language invented by the person who has the most to gain from its use. Moxie is not at all innocent in any of this and I'm glad he's no longer involved with Signal, which I use every day.
What, when did he stop being so?
Do you have a recommendation for someone who has never read her work?
I notice you say "something" and not "someone". With humans, contribution varies. I could commission a piece and have a great deal of input on the final result, or I could just have exercised judgement to choose the piece. Many people descibe their clothing choices or home decor choices as "creative" or "creative expression".
The world has been changing a lot over those decades, and the technological and surveillance capabilities of state actors (and malicious, non-state actors, for that matter) has increased dramatically. Not needing E2EE a few decades ago has nothing to do with whether or not we need it now.
Good to know I wasn't just unlucky.

Did you find any typical repairs for the lid section?

(I haven't opened up my wiggly units yet, but I guess probably it got banged, and either screws were stripped out of their holes, or some internal plastic piece snapped.)
> how does having less friends benefit you?

Quality over quantity for a start.

> people can have different opinions

Not every opinion deserves the same level of tolerance, respect or acceptance. If someone I know starts goose-stepping I’m not going to write it off a “just a difference in opinion.”
But which is it? Do you agree with Graham's essay and your own graph, or do you disagree?

It sounds like you believe in the graph, but don't want to turn people off. Just own your belief.

FWIW I think you should disagree with Graham's essay and your own graph. Saying that "left" and "right" were both 50% wrong is like saying the same about "federalist" and "anti-federalist". Even if the sides are 50% wrong, the free thinkers would be widely distributed.
Watch the video

Back at you. Watch the video until the end where they say this explicitly.

the purpose of the demo, as the creators explained it, was to train a creature to move quickly

That's an extremely narrow and literal conception of the demo and the response. They're not children.

- "Here, Mr. Miyazaki -- we have made a fast-moving zombie!"

- "I don't like the zombie you have made!"
... In theory yes, but company incentive structures don't always amount to this.

If you take that too literally and act on your own initiative in ways unrelated to your job description, you may well be dismissed for circumventing upper-management decisionmaking and not staying in your lane, even if you make money for the company in the process.

Or if you make tons of money for your company doing what you were hired to do, but do so from home in violation of a mandatory RTO order, you may quickly be replaced by someone who makes less money for your company but sits in the correct cubicle.

In reality, you're not merely hired to make money for the company, you're hired to do your job, even if it's not the maximally profitable action.
I have a PowerBook titanium G4 from 2003 that I can boot but never bother because it's not worth the power consumption.
What posture?
Contracts with either Russia, or the US are worthless.
E.g. the Budapest Memorandum?

"
According to the three memoranda, Russia, the U.S., and the U.K. confirmed their recognition of Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively removing all Soviet nuclear weapons from their soil, and that they agreed to the following:

1. Respect the signatory's independence and sovereignty in the existing borders (in accordance with the principles of the CSCE Final Act).

2. Refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of the signatories to the memorandum, and undertake that none of their weapons will ever be used against these countries, except in cases of self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

3. Refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine, the Republic of Belarus, and Kazakhstan of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind.

4. Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to the signatory if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used".

5. Not to use nuclear weapons against any non–nuclear-weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a state in association or alliance with a nuclear weapon state.

6. Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments.
"
For me Germany and Estland are confused de/ee !?
Maybe an unpopular opinion, but the article mentioned very low skills jobs as courier, assembler, clerk.

There is a reason why those people are doing job like these instead that better jobs.
Some people are just not interested in doing their work correctly, some other are not skilled enough.
> It's easy to spot political tribalism - just reference the comments here. They ultimately misrepresent, and have never tried to understand, their opposition's political position.

Can you explain the Trump administration's political aims this term? Because this sounds very much like both sides are the same, and I'm not seeing that at all with what Trump and Elon are trying to accomplish.
But, in that case, shouldn't they be using | here?
"Reduces trillions of foreign debt, also causes double that in inflation"
Martin Luther King was pretty clear what he thought of "the middle":

> I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to 'order' than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice
This is, as they say, “sanewashing”. Trump is doing this out of a mix of spite and a view of trade as a zero sum game. He may be advised into a path to try to pivot this into a “win” by large scale debt restructuring, but that is not the overarching motive.
For roadtrips, you're absolutely right.

The average car travels less than 50 miles on the average day though (more like 30 I believe). This means you don't have to charge except on roadtrips (provided you can park outside in the sun, and don't drive more than average. The battery can provide some smoothing out of day-to-day variability though).

Whether not having to plug in at home is particularly useful... hard to know if it's something consumers want.
Kill people's savings, might happen. Discretionary spending is about to get clobbered. Restaurants may be at the top of that list, and travel.

I rather doubt Walmart is going to increase the price of only Chinese made goods 25%. I think everything goes up 25% and they pocket the margin as long as they can get away with it.
Cool. What about our economy?

Are my eggs getting cheaper yet?
Very nice!

nit: country label appears under the mouse. Edge Browser, Mac
50 miles of free driving a day sounds incredible, but you're implying that's a bad thing? I'm confused.
but this is the problem. we lost good faith. but we can't continue down this road. it will end in a bureaucratic nightmare.

laws can only cover the excesses. if you make laws to detailed then the enforcement of those laws will become to expensive and that will make them even less likely to be enforced. one example are social benefits. it has been argued (i don't know in which country) that being less strict in who gets benefits would save more money than the loss caused by those who should not receive them.

NIMBYism is also an outgrowth of that. another example, in germany large scale projects are taking decades and cost 10 times as much as planned because people are not acting in good faith. the US is not far behind in some areas. (the high speed rail project in california comes to mind)

yes, you can't rely on people acting in good faith. but there was a time when you could. and we need to get back to that.
Sure, but in the US, the choices right now are between a party that you might not fully agree with, and a party whose explicit platform is to strip fundamental rights away from women, LGBTQ people, and other minorities, all while dismantling the basic structures of democracy in order to guarantee their hold on power for as long as possible.

When you vote for a party, you may not fully agree with all their policies, but you are stating that the drawbacks are acceptable compromises. When you vote for FooBar, you might not want puppies to be kicked, but you consider it a tradeoff worth making if it gets you that tax cut.

If you are looking at the political landscape of the US as an independent thinker, and are questioning whether abandoning the principles of human rights and liberal democracy are a tradeoff worth making, then I really question whether your thoughts are really as independent as you would like to believe.
This underscores the difficulty companies have trying to navigate through this. Even if Trump doesn't change his mind tomorrow, as he's liable to, he's only around for another four years and for most companies that's not enough time to justify a supply chain overhaul.
There's a lot of speculation that the Switch 2 would be atleast hundred dollars less without this nonsense. The Japan exclusive version of the Switch 2 seems to support this, with it's restrictions that insulate Japan, support the notion that English actually isn't needed in Japan (nor any other languages), by releasing a version of the Switch 2 that is far cheaper but only allows you to play games in Japanese.
I think it's nice that they consider liberty at all, it's rare where I come from.
H&M clothing ads to use AI replicas of real fashion models
An obvious worry with this is that it's one step closer to not paying models at all, and using entirely synthetic images that aren't based on any real person.

But an interesting angle the article points out is that even their current plan, licensing a real model's likeness, can take away jobs for photographers, makeup artists, hairstylists, lighting technicians, and the like.
https://youtu.be/DXY_8cJlGMc
Cool as hell, thanks for sharing!
This is precisely the problem.

Plus, even assuming there existed lots of people to fill the gap, why would they sign up for manufacturing jobs? They pay like crap. Unions and worker rights have been gradually chipped away at for years and now they're straight up chainsawing them. Why work a monotonous job that pays at or just slightly above minimum wage, has skills that aren't really transferable should you decide to change careers, is rough on the body and doesn't even provide proper health care or sick days to rest, and employers will call you in during natural disasters with the threat of firing you otherwise and then leave you to literally die while pretending it's not their fault when you do die? [1]

It's companies and the government saying, "We want everything, and in exchange, we'll give you nothing. And you will be happy." No American sees their kid growing up and thinks, "I hope my child will one day work long hours at a factory." People in some countries do, and it's because those jobs are a step up from the current standard. Factory jobs in the US are, in many cases, a step down and that step keeps lowering. High tech/high skilled manufacturing can be an exception, but the bulk of the jobs they're hoping to bring back aren't that.

[1] https://www.npr.org/2024/11/02/g-s1-28731/hurricane-helene-t...
> And that figure is questionable.

It's made up. It's based on our trade deficit with them, which has absolutely nothing to do with tariffs.
Not every agency has access to every other agencies data, and that's how it should be. There is nothing stupid about implementing principle of least privilege at the government level in the context of data access.

It is kind of stupid to advocate for just giving everything carte blanch to the government when they don't need it, as Europeans tend to be so eager to do.

Yes, the government has access, but let then get a warrant if some agency has a reason to access it.
> The implication instead seems to be that unless you are somewhere in the middle of the spectrum you must be "tribal". That feels dismissive.

It's not about where you are on the spectrum. I know neoliberal moderate Democrats, people who would have voted for George H.W. Bush in 1988, who are more tribal about current U.S. politics than any socialist I've met. What makes it unpleasant to talk politics with them is a combination of two things: the narrow set of answers they're willing to accept on every topic, and the anger and suspicion they broadcast at anyone who says anything else. For example, they have an acceptable set of answers for why Trump won in 2024 (racism and sexism) and if you suggest any other contributing factors (like arrogance, elitism, and various screw-ups in the Democratic party) then you must be on the other side, blaming the victims and making excuses for Trump supporters. You can say a dozen things morally condemning Trump and the Republican Party and then make one strategic criticism of the Democrats, and they'll look at you like maybe they can't ever trust you anymore. They'll parade their emotional distress and look at you sideways if you don't have the energy to mirror it. All this without being especially politically informed, politically engaged, or politically radical, or caring if anybody else is informed, engaged, or radical -- they judge themselves and others purely by fervor and narrowness.
My friend was married to a USC (bona fide legit marriage) and they almost fucked them over during Biden administration casting doubt on their marriage. In San Francisco, not some red state. Many examples of that nature regardless of the administration.

Almost always if your case is legit, you'll be fine in the end and nothing to worry about, just as your lawyer says, but it does not mean there won't be a bumpy ride. I genuinely doubt Trump administration is any worse or better unless you affirmatively have anti-Western ideas or from Travel Ban countries. In fact, the anecdotes I have heard so far on the consular processing of Immigrant Visas is better than Biden era.
You raise an excellent point that US corporate tax evasion is exaggerating the trade deficit. However, from the perspective of winning US elections, I think it does not change the issue that the trade deficit falls more on de-industrializing Midwestern states, and the corporations you are referring to are concentrated in Northeastern and Western states.

Secondly, if Microsoft or Apple makes the profit appear in Ireland, it cannot move that money back to the domestic US, right? So as long as the money sits overseas, it would not count towards US trade and thus the deficit calculation is fair.
This. On the Mermaid Chart site they say:
"By the creators of Mermaid JS"
I don't know the details but assuming they're being truthful, there definitely appears to be a tight relationship.
He has talked about VAT, but in terms of how they ended up with those numbers, people noticed that the claimed rates don't have anything to do with the actual tariff/VAT/etc. rates, they're just based on the relative size of the US trade deficit with each country.

The gloss will be "this way captures all the various unfair things they're doing to us that are the cause of all these trade deficits" but that's just, well, gloss.
Here in Argentina, legal immigrants' visas cannot be revoked, and illegal immigrants generally can only be deported if they are accused of a crime. (Being present illegally is not itself a crime.) They have several weeks to challenge the deportation in court.

Nearly all other countries behave differently. The kind of "immigration law enforcement" we're seeing today in the US is far outside the norms of liberal democracy.

Debating morality rather than legality, any policy that gives thugs free rein to grab people who are not harming others off the street, and imprison them, is immoral, and should be stopped. Even if it were the policy of every country in the world, it should still be stopped.
Ah thanks for explaining lol, got it!
That the administration thinks they just just drag people into vans and ship them off to a foreign prison?
When Frameworks first came out, there was doubt that they couldn't last a year.

Or launch multiple lines.

Longevity is built one step at a time. Voting with dollars only helps it become an option enough and signal to other manufacturers to consider similar ways.
I still have my T61 thinkpad from 2007. Other than the dead battery, it works great.
> chlorine gas can be stored in a garage in coke bottles

I get the point you're trying to make but you absolutely can't store chlorine gas safely in your garage in a coke bottle. If you try doing this as a business, you'll get shut down hard and possibly some prison time too.

On the other hand, WordPress is a valid solution for a huge number of businesses. Perhaps the previous commentor should have labored their point and noted that the engineer's skill is required to know when WordPress is a valid option, and also just as importantly, when it's not.

But suggesting the use of WordPress is in no way comparable to doing something illegal like storing chlorine gas improperly.

A better comparison would be to using an off the shelf chlorine storage system versus developing your own.
For most companies, off the shelf will be the right choice, but others are doing complex things that require them to develop their own systems.
The Art of Insight in Science and Engineering: Mastering Complexity
You also aren't at war with TdA or MS-13.
Ah, for some reason, this is the comment that reminded me specifically of Nietzche's Master-Slave Morality[1].

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%E2%80%93slave_morality
Only if you cancel foreign investment, which absolutely nobody is talking about. That is a closed economy.

Nothing about trade stops you from selling your home and factory and national parks to China so that you can enjoy treats today.
MicroVMs: Foundations and Applications
Wait till they get popular, and then they will abandon this.
Curipod | Product (Full stack) Engineer | Full time | Remote (US-based) | https://curipod.com

Curipod founder here.

Curipod is the all in one platform for teachers to plan and deliver AI native interactive lessons that prepare kids for the 21st century.

1+ million Monthly Students and growing fast.

Most of the engineering team are former founders and CTOs. Join us to redefine how classroom lessons are done natively with AI.

Lots of Nextjs, React and TS and node. Move fast and build great stuff with users.

Apply here: [https://curipod.notion.site/Product-Engineer-ab56cf80eadc45c...](https://www.notion.so/Product-Engineer-ab56cf80eadc45c697c10...)
Indeed. So the visitor need only wait for the 20mb javascript bundle, but not the 600kb of images, before he can see the 1kb of text that he visited the site to read.
I booted up my Thinkpad 760 XL from 1997 recently and let it run for a couple days. My WinZip was more than 9000 days past expiration, and it counted up one by one, the number just spinning ever upward for the better part of half an hour. 2 of the 3 batteries I had for it still charged to above 90% and drained at the normal rate, so I could still run it unplugged for around 6 hours. The batteries were modular, so you could have a cdrom, floppy, or battery in the first bay and a battery in the second bay. I normally ran it with 2 batteries and an external pcmcia cdrom that ran on double-a's. For a 28 year old laptop, it was still incredibly usable.
Privacy Isn't Optional–How MokaHR Protects Candidate Data in Recruitment
Recruitment platforms promise efficiency, but at what cost? In a world where data breaches and privacy concerns are escalating, job applicants and HR teams alike are asking: Who actually owns candidate data, and how secure is it?

The Hidden Risk in Hiring Tech
Most recruitment systems collect vast amounts of personal data—resumes, contact details, work histories, even interview recordings. This data is gold for employers but also a prime target for leaks, misuse, and regulatory penalties. Many platforms prioritize features over security, leaving sensitive information exposed.

MokaHR’s Privacy-First Approach
MokaHR takes a different stance. Rather than treating privacy as an afterthought, we’ve built our system around strict data protection protocols and compliance with global privacy laws. Our recruitment platform ensures that:

Only essential data is collected, minimizing exposure risks.

Encryption and access controls safeguard candidate information.

Compliance with GDPR, CCPA, and other regulations is baked into the platform.

Transparency Over Data Ownership
One of the biggest concerns in HR tech is who owns candidate data—the employer, the software provider, or the job board? With MokaHR, there’s no ambiguity. Your data stays in your control, and we never use it beyond the scope of your hiring needs.

The Trade-Off: Privacy vs. Convenience?
Some argue that strict privacy measures slow down hiring, but that’s a false choice. MokaHR proves you can have both security and efficiency—with automated workflows, AI-driven candidate matching, and seamless interview scheduling without compromising privacy.

The Future of Privacy in Recruitment
As regulations tighten and candidates become more aware of data risks, companies using outdated, insecure recruitment tools will face growing scrutiny. MokaHR offers a future-proof solution that keeps privacy at the core of hiring, not just as a compliance checkbox.

Hiring shouldn’t come at the cost of privacy. Is your recruitment platform protecting your data, or exposing it?
The more I think about Trumpian strategies the more I suspect that he got some friends together (or they came to him) and decided they'll short everything, then he'll do this for a while. He and those friends would be able to 'generate billions' that way, by legal insider trading (since we learned that anything he does "in an official capacity" is legal and he can pardon anyone who ever got caught).

Last term he did some tax on bauxite that had a similar effect of costing billions to a whole industry that processes or buys aluminum, but one of the few bauxite mines in the US, run by a Trump ally of some kind, made bank.
Reminds me of how some of the best ideas come out of working within restrictions, not in spite of them
How does headscale hold up when you're streaming video over jellyfin/plex?
It might be worth putting those examples and other use cases you've found in the post. That is certainly something Google can't do.