skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not if he expects them to keep going down as long as the current administration is in power.
I'm sorry, but how did Wall St "blow it"? Is the piece making the case that if this sell-off had started in January, then Trump wouldn't have magicked up these tariffs?
Are you arguing with me or the person I am replying to?

I object to people casually paraphrasing, you have a right to free speech but not consequences of that speech. "Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences" Aside from sounding vaguely like a threat, it's a paradoxical attack on freedom of speech. Here's my point again:

Freedom of speech means a lot of things. One of them is the American-centric perspective of "1st Amendment" + Supreme Court precedent, which is that the government should not be involved in unduly prohibiting speech, and we define a bunch of speech as protected. For example, we exclude imminent threat, which in the U.S. is not protected - I can't go up in a speech and rile people up to go attack another race tomorrow. But I can rail against a race (which in most of Europe would be prohibited speech as it's Incitement)).

Now that I've established it means a few things, let's talk about 'consequences.'. The 1st Amendment protects you from government prosecution for protected speech. It doesn't protect you from getting fired, people following you around with placards because of your speech, Instagram banning you, your ISP blocking you, your bank canceling your accounts, etc.

Yet these are the (non-1st-Amendment-centric) attacks on Freedom of Speech. You can argue they're good, they're not good, whatever.

Summary of my argument: freedom of speech CAN mean freedom from SOME consequences.

Consequences are the WHOLE point. In the U.S. we had McCarthyism, where if you were vaguely left-wing you would lose your job, you would lose your life. In the USSR if you didn't follow party lines you'd lose your job, or be reassigned a shitty job. These are Consequences.

In the Reign of the last decade of a new racialized political activism, some people lost jobs for reasons that were dubious, because they had unpopular views. The Left did it.

Today, the Right is doing it, and they're taking in an extra step.

When does it stop? Ahh, good question! It stops when we begin respecting Freedom of Speech as a principle and not a recycled way to attack our enemies.

Again, apologies for both-sides-ism, as someone who believes in civil liberties, I am a both-sides-ist.
Show me the results of your symbolic AI on ARC 2.
Are you saying the JavaScript api shouldn’t use types?
I appreciate the caution - and although they're close in spelling, I'd wager coolify is recognized by the majority as adding the suffix 'ify' to 'cool' rather than the term you've highlighted.
>it reminds me a lot of the various Trotskyist or other far left sects and personalities I encountered when I was younger.

because that is exactly what it is. Rand idolized and worshipped great men and industrialists the way the Soviets taught you too, except through an American funhouse mirror.

Her individualism wasn't an authentic lived inner freedom of for example Tolstoy (in a religious way) or Stirner (in an atheist way) but simply worship of individuality and particular individuals. It's why it made for a fantastic mass movement and fandom of sorts.
Not a mention in the article of pulling models from HuggingFace. Clickbait headline?
I've come to liquidate your positions again...
It might scale up but if you're anywhere near efficient you're way overprovisioned to begin with. The compute cost should be miniscule due to caching and bandwidth is cheap if you're not with one of the big clouds. As an example, according to dang HN runs on a single server and yet many websites that get posted to HN, and thus receive a fraction of the traffic, go down due to the load.
Aren't semiconductors exempt from the tariffs?
As a general rule, with some exceptions of course, Democrat politicians tend to "roll over and take it". If the Supreme Court rules that Trump is the president from 2028-2032, expect blue state leaders to just go "oh ok" and then accept that he is the president.

You can contrast it with what red states would do if Obama had a third term.
I mean, they generated the tariff schedule using ChatGPT. What could go wrong?

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-tariffs-chatgpt-205520...
Intentionally cratering the economy raises unemployment, which applies downward pressure on wages, and allows entities that are cash-rich and privy to the timings of the intentional market shocks to buy up large swathes of the country for pennies on the dollar, which makes the merger of corporate and government power smoother and more easily total.

J. Paul Getty happened to be in the right place at the right time for the 1929 market crash to result in an explosion in his net worth, what’s happening here is akin to ultra wealthy individuals recreating Black Thursday with the only difference being that it has been very publicly engineered and telegraphed in advance.

That is the steelman, if you think that those things are good things.
You are yourself in the business of squeezing, so any company that will be willing to deal with you will have the aim to squeeze you.
BASIC was written as a team in Bellevue. Altair did nothing to support them until they traveled to Albuquerque and proved the code worked.
Love my Coolify Setup!
We've effectively done that with streaming on-demand programming and local storage allowing pausing of OTA programming.

Also, Octopus Energy is now the UKs largest provider, they have tariffs with variable rates (demand-based pricing). Very occasionally you can be paid to use electricity. That's certainly encourages some users away from boiling the kettle at peak times.
By the way, in US do federal and local governments give a preference to locally manufactured products in government purchases?
Openness Guides Discovery
Ascalon "silicon" (aka chips) is instead brought up in the "next 12 month" section.

i.e. We'll see Ascalon soon, just not yet.
Francois never said he dislike LLMs. In fact, he said he expected them to be part of the solution to ARC.

I don’t know where this persistent myth comes from, but it has to go.
No, why would it?

The United States has burned trust and credibility that can never be recovered. Its collapse into a pariah state like North Korea or Russia, cut off from diplomatic ties and trade and left by most of the world to decompose into an irrelevant husk is inevitable. The market will adapt, likely after years of global depression, with China and Europe competing to become the new global hegemon. The normal that existed prior to Trump, like all those jobs he promised, is never coming back.

If you see a Trump supporter, be sure to thank them.
First of all, I don’t like Trump. I’ve voted blue all my life. Having said that, Trump is the only one willing to play ball with the Chinese. And the US national debt is not sustainable at this level. Something has to break in order to bring down servicing costs. I am not saying this is the right way to do all this. Far from it. But we do have a huge debt problem in this country and Chinese corps do not play by the rules (ie IP is nonexistent).

This could go wrong in so many ways and eventually undermine US strength while boosting Chinese global influence even further.
New trade routes and spinning up local production will take time (likely longer five years) so the consumer will pay a price.

The main issue I see is that in 3.5 or possible 1.5 years, a new president ( or laws passed through congress ) will just vacate all Trump executive orders, tariffs in included. So that $100 million you invested in a new factory that is 3/4 built? Sorry, tariffs are gona and now you are out $100 mil. Why would any corp assume that risk?
This is an incredibly poor take - curious as to how you just completely made up that ridiculous claim? Ironic as well that you think letters of recommendation matter for college admissions when they are perfunctory for probably > 95% of them. Maybe you shouldn't espouse your opinions on this.
Democracy and elections are not opinion polls. It's a distribution of political power.
Both - but primary the cloud offering. The main author (https://x.com/heyandras) is pretty open about the project revenue its sources. If I remember correctly they're at about 10k MRR mostly from Coolify Cloud.

Edit: Latest "post" (xeet?) https://mobile.x.com/heyandras/status/1901894087604916396 I could find about revenue
Yes but we are not talking about static types...
Scientists Just Discovered Quantum Signals Inside Life Itself
Related paper URL: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c07936
I'm hoping the lesson we learn is "do everything possible to maintain 3 separate but co-equal branches of government"

Tariffs are supposed to be imposed by congress, not the president. The president is using a loophole (declaring a national emergency) to give himself authority to bypass congress.

It shouldn't be possible for 1 branch of government to take such drastic measures unilaterally.
Things like this: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/04/survey-americans...

I’m also quite sure letters matter for undergraduate admissions. They certainly do at the graduate level.
Those things that are highly local have been dominating middle class budgets because foreign stuff like clothes has gotten so cheap. That's a good thing -- if you spend less money on some things you have more money for others. If you make the foreign stuff expensive, the local stuff will less dominate budgets as they destroy those budgets.
yes. and math/logics trained brains confuse hierarchical namespaces with trees. names in nested namespaces should be DAGs, maybe even arbitrary graphs, meaning a chair can be a sit-on thing in several contexts, but not in all (think meeting).

in many contemporary programming languages you can express this, too, by exporting some imported name.
> Meanwhile a protocol like SPI is ridiculously simple

Yes, it is. It was intended to require as little silicon as possible to minimize the cost to the transistor budget. SPI doesn't contemplate power supply, hot-plug, discovery, bit errors, or any other of a host of affordances you get with USB.

I think there is some value for software developers to understanding SPI and the idioms used by hardware designers with SPI. Typically, SPI is used to fill registers of peripherals: the communication is not the sort of high level, asynchronous stuff you typically see with USB or Ethernet and all the layers of abstraction built upon them. Although there is no universal standard for SPI frames, they do follow idiomatic patterns, and this has proven sufficient for an uncountably vast number of applications.
>> If you want to saturate any model today give it a string and a grammar and ask it to generate the string from the grammar.

I'm not sure I understand what that means - could you explain please?
It sounds like you're against the idea of national self determination altogether. Can you think of an example of a successful assertion of the right to self determinism which didn't involve a national entity asserting sovereignty over a body of land populated by a diverse group of people?

As we have already established, the population in the land of the historical mandate has exploded, including a manifold increase of Arabs (living peacefully within the borders of modern Israel as equal citizens, I might add), so clearly it is possible to accommodate this diverse population in a Jewish state.

Are you against all national self determination? Or is there some threshold of homogeneous concentration of one people after which it becomes legitimate? If the Zionist pioneers had managed to achieve a 99% majority of Jewish population in Palestine through legal immigration before asserting sovereignty, would that pass your test?

Or would you just prefer to see the European Jewry perish in toto under the Holocaust and Eastern European pogroms?
Also checkout Dokploy. Incredible to leave Vercel.
I've made thousands of reservations work booking.com, this does not happen.
The problem with this plan is that the tariffs are likely to cause inflation. (Because now prices have to include the tariffs.) In a period of inflation, people are unwilling to buy bonds of any kind, including Treasury bonds, unless they have a high interest rate. This will increase the cost of rolling over the debt, and will create even worse problems for our government.
So this is the wrong way but will still address the deficit? How exactly will this address the deficit?
Bitching Betty Speaks: How Talking Machines Got Their Gendered Voices
Heroku has been around for ~17 years at this point. Why do you think it disappears in the next 10?
The piece misses a crucial layer of spiritual depth, reducing complex human struggles to mere moral conflicts without grappling with the existential weight they carry.

Al Goldstein’s brash claim—that porn defies Christian culture and elevates the self above God [1] points to a deeper void that this article’s clinical focus ignores.

Its data-driven approach feels hollow when it sidesteps the soul-searching questions that often define these experiences.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Goldstein#Views_on_religion
I'm saying there are too many things to learn to get even a simple example let alone a real world example going. Have a look at their examples at https://docs.hatchet.run/home/conditional-workflows
only reason I wrote near to zero, is because if I left it at zero, someone else would have chimed in about something pedantic about how there is still theta to decay

specifically because OP bought 1 to 2 week expirations, so a market reversal at the other end of the weekend won't set them to zero
> if any party can do something you are afraid of, focus on the enabling factors that allows them to do that

Perhaps you can enlighten me what these enabling factors are? Because I thought vigorous debate, a free press, and a balance of power between branches of government were the controls; not what enables problematic politics.

Yet it would appear criticism is increasingly cause for expulsion, journalism seen as a justification for lawfare, and that 2.5 of the 3 branches have been captured by an irrational fear and a cult-like trust in a second rate celebrity.

> we can bridge consensus on what everyone is afraid the other party might leverage

Can we? Within my circle those leaning right are too wedded to their tribe affiliation to see the hypocrisy and inconsistencies in their conclusions. If they are unwilling to agree on a consistent set of rules for all then there won't be consensus.
> They had the opposite effect

The Ruble was on it's way to complete devaluation before Trump propped up the Russian economy by signaling he's willing to give them everything in exchange for nothing.

But it's also true that the west never really fully committed to the sanctions, the fact that you still had Russian oligrarchs traveling around Europe with relative ease was a pretty strong tell.
“All he’s done for the world” by copyrighting Covid vaccine, eh?
Induced demand is only a problem for transportation methods like driving that aren’t scalable. With a metro, you just add more trains and more frequent departure times. Of course such an “ambitious” plan requires political will and less veto power for current residents.
Beggar Thy Neighbour
Pretty sure that this wasn't implied. It's more about being "life wise".
The "intentionally tank the economy to roll over national debt at lower rates" theory completely misses how government bonds actually work. A bond is essentially a promise: you lend the government money for a specific period, and they pay you back with interest at the end. When that bond matures, it's simply paid off. There's no refinancing happening.

What people call "rolling over" debt just means the government is issuing brand new bonds to raise money to pay off the ones that are maturing. These are completely separate transactions, often with entirely different investors. The government continuously sells new bonds and pays off maturing ones as part of normal operations.

Creating a recession to somehow game this system would be spectacularly counterproductive. Tax revenue would collapse while unemployment benefits and other social spending would skyrocket, creating even larger deficits. Any minor interest savings would be dwarfed by the economic damage. Not to mention the Fed sets rates based on economic conditions, not to help government borrowing. This isn't some clever financial strategy—It's just bad economics built on a fundamental misunderstanding of how sovereign debt markets function.
Oops: important -> import
I get what you're arguing but isn't "Jail the President for doing Presidential stuff" a bit charitable? "Nope, don't see it" isn't so simple, I think a lot of people would argue that this follows from the rule of law set down in the constitution in the form of things like the supremacy clause and implied by our entire legal/political structure.
A perverse incentive implies following the letter of the law, but cheating the spirit of the law.

GP is just talking about inefficient rules
Reminds me of the Narcissist's Prayer:

That didn't happen.

And if it did, it wasn't that bad.

And if it was, that's not a big deal.

And if it is, that's not my fault.

And if it was, I didn't mean it.

And if I did, you deserved it.
> Biden was one of the most successful presidents in US history

Biden? If that man was actually the one leading the country over the last 2+ years, I’ll eat your hat. All that is coming out now from multiple sources in the administration seem to indicate he hasn’t been capable of making many decisions for quite a while now.
I've never understood why countries like the EU pass strict environment and labor laws and then DONT place some kind of tariff or tax on countries without those restrictions. Not only to offset making your own market less able to compete on cost, but to provide a financial incentive for the other countries to up their game on environmental and worker quality-of-life issues (if that is the overall aim).
See, what you do is charge up the atmosphere as a 'battery' (capacitor).

/Tesla

Non-chemical batteries, flywheels and hydroelectric storage green hydrogen and such other ways of storing energy as we can come up with are certainly part of the solution.
Bingo. Breaking the system does not make anything work better except human suffering.
The Decline of the U.S. Machine-Tool Industry and Prospects for Recovery (1994)
Watching TV Makes You Smarter (2005)
The federal government does a lot more than dictate tariffs. There's immigration, monetary policy, war spending, etc. And Trump is not afraid to bully governors, so state policies will also be affected.
Thanks for the question. Three reasons:

(1) Much like a carbon tax, when the economy becomes accountable for an externality (risk in this case, rather than carbon) it is priced in at every level, ending with consumers, whose demand is price-sensitive. Not all consumer goods of the same class will be impacted equally, creating a natural price advantage.

(2) Once the economy adjusts to these new risk-adjusted prices, POTUS can always offer clemency for specific goods and industries to respond to global supply shocks, providing a large buffer for the now-adjusted American consumer.

(3) Narrowly: it is exceedingly unlikely we won't see production onshoring in any capacity like you suggest. Economic analysis of the first-term Trump tariffs, for example, did indeed find production onshoring.
Next article: doom scrolling not intrinsically bad for you
Did we ever get an explanation of why they used internet TLDs as proxies for actual nations?
I'm reminded of a Final Jeopardy! clue from a few years back --

> As of 2013, this 3-letter verb common in sports, theater & politics has the largest entry in the online OED.

The correct response? What is "run"?
South Korea Is Over – Population Bomb [video]
The terms NGO-speak or PMC didn't come from some "rightwing information wormhole."

These are very real ideas and concepts that average people internally and instinctively revile: they are no longer people but "human resources."
This is both the most rational and most depressing take I have seen yet.
Whatever the actual work that was, the sound engineer did the world a favor by cutting the cord to her mic right there and then.
UART over LVDS is still quite simple and works well for long cables and it tolerates ground differences and noise well.
and why would it? when there's profit to be taken?

it's a game of "chicken", holding pout until someone drops retail proces.
Each university could provide a custom entry exam to ensure the test is unique and difficult enough to not be gamed as easily
Set aside the 2000 year old history for a moment. Given that the Jews were a persecuted minority across Europe - and indeed faced the a campaign of extermination far worse than early Zionists feared - one can see the moral necessity for their self determination.

Anti-Zionism is antisemitic because it declares that no, it is preferable for Jews to continue to face the Holocaust and other attempts at their genocide than to concede their right to self defense as a people.
There are already ways to enforce those -- for example, Democrats and US labor unions used the USMCA negotiations to enact a "facility specific rapid response mechanism" that lets the US essentially strong-arm Mexico and Mexican companies into improving collective bargaining rights within the context of the trade deal; section 307 products (created by forced labor) have been illegal since 1930 (and enforced more strictly over the past decade, given concerns about Chinese slave labor); carbon import taxes addressing environmental regulations have been proposed in Congress, but haven't been implemented yet. The government also has existing authorities under anti-dumping and countervailing duty (ADD/CVD) legislation, so long as those duties comply with American obligations under international treaties (Trump's tariffs exist outside the ADD/CVD framework, and place the US in noncompliance relative to our WTO obligations).

Trump's tariffs don't really serve any specific policy goals other than "trade is bad and everyone should buy more from us than we buy from them," which is self-evidently absurd; why are we punishing Madagascar because we buy their vanilla and they're too poor to have extensive need of our services-based economy? Beggar-thy-neighbor trade policies inevitably beggar us as well, as we're likely to find out quite soon.
It should be obvious that this market correction is the desired outcome for this administration and its defenders.

If there weren't so many people whose livelihood or investment portfolios benefited from free trade or government spending the economic indicators wouldn't react as badly. Punishing or disincentivizing economic activity they don't like is more important than increasing GDP or asset values.

It may seem like a weak argument because of the circular logic but that shouldn't surprise any of us.
He’s (rather Bessent) literally crashing the economy in order to force the Fed to lower the rates. To be fair, a soft landing was a pipe dream. Bessent has a long history of talking about this type of reckoning.
> Trump is the only one willing to play ball with the Chinese

Biden was also willing to do so. For example, he put a 100% tariff on electric cars.

> But we do have a huge debt problem in this country.

Which is largely Trump's fault. He increased the debt by $8T versus Biden's $5T, and people costing his promises on the campaign trail concluded that his promises would increase the debt at twice the rate that Harris's promises would have.
Solar cells made of moon dust could power future space exploration