skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I find this SSHD snippet to be extremely useful in enterprise network, notably with OpenLDAP.

Also the most dangerous but flexible way to authenticate a user.

https://jpmens.net/2019/03/02/sshd-and-authorizedkeyscommand...
Care to share some, friend?
Which models are there? The only other ones I know is patreon-like, which totally destroy the long tail.

And long-tail ones are the best. There are some great videos on youtube which are 10+ years old and do not have millions of views. I am sure many of their uploaders already forgot about them. I cannot see them existing without being supported by "something", and if that's not advertisement, than what?
Social Media Engineers
Isn't this article advertisement by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)?

(edit: I have actually been thinking in similar terms as the article, but I do think the article is optimistic and utopian, as if a good intuition would be enough to prevent the very same forces from exploring the reform

Filtering visitors by fingerprint of the browser (cloud flare and palemoon) won't stop bots, but creates a market for more sophisticated bots)
So we are talking about cheap chains, not middle class places. These are just slightly glorified fast food.
In Europe, apart from TGI Fridays, they were never a thing. And they were seen as just simply fast food. If they vanished, few people will mention.
If these are middle class they are for well, "statistical middle", i.e. working poor.

Proper restaurants should be small businesses and family owned and grow their client base over generations, then they are pretty much bulletproof against all kinds of economic hardships.
Yes! I wrote my own response, but your post made me realize the most important piece of missing advice: if you want a great offer, interview at a company with lots and lots of money
ya your snark is underwhelming. the comment was about increasing rates of baldness in young men, not whatever point you are trying to make.
I interpreted your question as asking if the US could use SpaceX's rocket manufacturing capacity to produce ICBMs that could be used to hit Chinese ships.

Now that I see that this was not what you're suggesting I don't think that two years is a sufficient time frame to build, test, and deploy the kinds of weapons that you're suggesting.

It seems like America is sleep walking into a horrible conflict with China and this combined with all of the soft power that America is losing in the past few months doesn't bode well for the outcome of this conflict.
It wouldn't be. Only avgas is leaded. Avgas is only used in piston engines. Turboprops and jet engines use jet A. Jet A is kerosene.
And then for them to say that they have too many pricing tiers and consolidate all of them into GitHub Copilot One.
American websites implement GDPR even though that's an EU law. Websites that are used across geopolitical boundaries will invariably follow US law. There will certainly be a few exceptions, but if the law is written like the GDPR, then they'd be illegally violating the law.

And services like Netflix losing an ad supported tier is just like... Netflix in 2021. I fail to see that as alarming.
The only time I hear or see anything about cloudinit, it is always a problem.
Nobody ever said "we don't need worry about that, cloudinit takes care of it".

What good does cloudinit do really?
This gave me something to think about. Thank you.
The current crop of AIs can't do science though, they are disconnected from the physical world and can't test hypothesis or gather data.
Randomness can be clumpy, but clumpiness does not have to be random. Clumpiness is typically causal. Your experiment won't tell you what you need to know.
This feels like one of those things where context changes over time and takes a product outside of it's original use case.

Fire retardant is an emergency measure, one that would rightly be expected to see exceptionally low usage overall. But over time, more people and property have gotten closer to the forest; forest fires affect more people for many reasons.

So fire retardant use is not so rare.

The Therac-20 was a fine piece of electro-mechanical-nuclear technology, but the Therac-25 moved the control scheme out of its original context, and took away some of the physical interlocks. The Therac-25 is not remembered fondly.

Context changes over time, and assumptions need to be re-examined.
Yes, but investors move in and out of cash positions. Bershire Hathaway is currently sitting on $334 billion in cash. If you're an active investor, you'll have periods of both buying and selling - so you'll have cash, or you won't have cash. To assume 100% is allocated at all times is incorrect.
Advertising is a zero-sum game, just as most crypto and stock market activity.

It's the basis for web2 economy just like crypto is the basis for web3 economy, though. So it's hard to make a man admit something when his livelihood depends on it.
Whenever I read about pair programming as a standard technique (like XP) it sounds so great in theory but in practice I find it extremely draining whenever I’ve dabbled.
I wasn't offended at all. I was just genuinely curious, because I keep coming across this assumption that if any text is well-crafted, it must have come from an LLM. I think I understand why: we've grown so used to reading sloppy writing, everything from barely coherent text messages to articles in reputable publications filled with typos and awkward phrasing.

Personally, I've always held myself to a high standard in how I write, even in text messages. Some might see that as bordering on perfectionism, but for me, it's about respecting the principle behind communication: to be as clear and correct as possible.

Now that we have tools that help ensure that clarity, or at the very least, reduce distractions caused by grammar or spelling mistakes, of course I'm going to use them. I used to agonize over my comments on Twitter because you couldn't edit them after posting. I would first write them elsewhere and review them several times for any errors before finally posting. For context: I'm a retired 69-year-old physician, and even after witnessing decades of technological advancement, I'm still in awe of what this new technology can do.

Yes, I love beautiful, natural writing. I'm a voracious reader of the great classics. I regularly immerse myself in Shakespeare, Hardy, Eliot, Dickens, Dostoyevsky, Austen, Tolstoy, and many other literary masters. But I also fully embrace this tool that can elevate even the clumsiest writer's work to a clarity we've never had access to before. If that comes at the cost of a bit of stylistic uniformity, that's a reasonable trade-off. It's up to the user to shape the output, review it, and make sure their own voice and ideas shine through.

Back to your original point, I truly wasn't offended on his behalf. I was just curious. As it turns out, he was using an LLM, because his native language is Korean. Good for him. And just to be clear, I didn't intend to make your question seem inappropriate or to embarrass him in any way. If it came across that way, I apologize.
> any mexican who wants to buy american goods must convert their pesos to dollars. where do they get dollars? see initial conditions, they must get them from americans by sending their pesos overseas

This thread is over. I asked you to come back armed with references to support your claims and instead you continue to spout nonsense. Currency exchange simply doesn’t work the way you describe, full stop.
The odd thing is, you can do quite some bold/italics/superscript in Unicode nowadays. Because, at least from the ASCII letter range, they have been used in symbolic ways in Mathematics, etc., and have been added to Unicode as symbols rather than bold variants of letters. For example:

, !

, !

ᴴᵉˡˡᵒ, ᵂᵒʳˡᵈ!

So, there's almost no bold/italic punctuation. And non-ASCII Unicode letters aren't "supported" this way either. But you can get quite far with "formatted" ASCII letters in Unicode, if you're so inclined.
English speakers often do care about the connotation of "propaganda" as something deceptive or manipulative (with the paradigmatic example probably being wartime propaganda which tries to influence populations, supposedly without regard for the truth).

It's true that "propaganda" in the disparaging sense is more applied to political and ideological messages, but you can sometimes see it used about commercial messages when the speaker believes that those messages are especially manipulative, for example when the speaker believes an industry is bad but is wrongfully portraying itself as good by covering up harms that it causes. You might hear this more in connection with an "industry" ("tobacco industry propaganda" or "oil industry propaganda"), but I've occasionally heard it in connection with individual companies. But the negative connotation is pretty strong, so some listeners might be uncomfortable if they don't share the speaker's views of the propaganda author.

One can also say that a book is propaganda in the sense that the book is dishonest and manipulative advocacy, where the author isn't showing respect for the readers.

I wanted to write something about the question of how American rhetoric (and courts) see the relative value, or relative harmfulness, of commercial versus political advertising. But this turned into a complicated discussion that I'm not sure I can do a good job of, so I'm going to hold off on that for now.
It isn't the responsibility of the manufacturer to provide samples for analysis (unless the law compels them). Take it up with your government.

> Like how can the government spray random chemicals all over the land and there's no way for the public to compel them

There is, by voting.
They literally said that the ambiguity is good because it keeps everyone on their toes because no one knows if they are safe. That's their own words not my invented re-interpretation.

"The ambiguity of these questions is a feature rather than a bug. Being unable to tell when something is "advertising" forces everyone to think twice..."

Courts performing the job of interpretation is indeed not the same as selective enforcement, but this comment expressly advocates for deliberate ambiguity. Not unavoidable ambiguity.

They obviously did not know they are asking for selective enforcement by that name, or why that is a bad thing, a far worse thing than the advertizing or whatever other bad behavior they imagine "forces everyone to think twice" curtails, but that is what ambiguity in a law gets you.

Let alone a whole other dimension to this, that it doesn't even curtail what they think.

They think they are attacking advertizers, but advertizers are fine under selective enforcement. Really they are only attacking themselves and all other little guy individuals. Google and Amazon and all other advertizers have the money and the connections at city hall to get their own behavior selectively allowed. It's only you and me and themselves who will ever have to "think twice".

And it goes on down from every slightly bigger fish vs every slightly smaller. The local used car dealer uglifying your neighborhood has more friends on the police force and at the mayors office than you do, so they get to do whatever, and you get to think twice.
Of course, hackernews or the font it uses (?), doesn't seem to support the bold and italics Unicode symbols. Although it does seem to support the supperscript ones.
Reproducing Word2Vec with Jax
TLDR: https://extraakt.com/extraakts/llama-4-release-analysis
It would not be fine. It would have never been fine. It would have been a titanic clash of egos and culture, producing endless bickering and finger-pointing, with little meeting of minds. Apple runs the most vertically integrated general systems model outside of mainframes. Linux and its ecosystem represent the least.

In any case, as others have noted, the timeline here w.r.t nextstep is backwards.
Based on the website, was this published in 2016?

The job market in 2016 is unrecognizable to anyone who has had to look for a job recently.

It is absolutely brutal out there right now, and this feels a bit detached from reality.
Immigrants don't worry me, fascists do. I don't stay up at night worried an immigrant might deport me or send me to a prison to be raped
Maybe this is a blind spot for me, but my inclination is to think it doesn’t matter?

Only because the company has already made you an offer in the first place, ergo they see your value and are already making a bet on you. Has there ever been an instance where an offer has been rescinded because a prospective employee didn’t negotiate?
It’s not particularly asymmetric. China has ICBMS and is upwind from the US. It’s hard to imagine non-civilization-ending conflicts where dropping space rocks on China comes into play.
Do you think they really mean "per liter" of the actual sample or is this possibly the amount in an already diluted solution that they made from the sample? It seems like an odd unit of measurement otherwise.

What would have been helpful in the article was a comparison to the levels produced by the fire itself. Fires in residential areas produce all sorts of nasty stuff. While we should make the retardant as safe as we can, if it prevents something even worse from being released it still could be a win.
interesting to know, thanks. any link to some concrete benchmarks to share?
>The only thing I see is that having guns everywhere around does nothing to actually stop a country from descending into fascism.

The US is charting new ground here. Almost every other massively-oppressive state apparatus has prioritized restricting private firearms ownership early in their decent into tyranny for a reason.

> Thanks, I'll stay in my region, at least we have no school shootings or violent crime.

The rate of firearms ownership in the US has been on a slow decline for the past 40-50 years (not sure how accurate data is before 1970 or 1980), from roughly 45% to 30%. School shootings have skyrocketed in the past ~30 years, and were pretty rare before Columbine. The two don't appear to be correlated. How do you reconcile this? I suspect that other societal factors are more salient causes.....perhaps the explosion in single-mother parenthood (something like 40% of all families now), combined with the known impacts on poor juvenile behavior in young boys and the explosion in "attention culture" courtesy of social media are the major factors in emotionally unstable teens gunning down their peers?

That said....I live in a country with almost no firearms and also have the peace of mind that nobody is gonna shoot my children. But I'm also in a homogeneous society that has almost no concern or risk level for their government turning tyrannical.
> What would chi have to do with a body double? The body double might be a chi balancer or protective barrier helping to contain and calm the energy in and around the person with ADHD.

Does the writer believe that, or are they pandering?
Mine too.

I am not a big romance movie fan, but this is my favorite.

Characters you should hate but somehow want to succeed.

IMO one of Gary Oldmans best role.
This is just the nirvana fallacy. We need to do our best.
Honestly, I'm increasingly cynical that it's even possible. From what I've seen, it seems like people mostly crystalize their beliefs by 30 and then don't change their beliefs without some sort of immense personal suffering. And few who aren't affected by bigotry are going to go through that to change their mind. There are exceptions, but nowhere near enough to swing political trends.

I think Trump's idiotic economic policies will probably result in losing voters as they're harmed directly, but that's just more of people caring about themselves. It's not a fundamental change in people's beliefs about the homeless, lgbt people, racial minorities, etc.--if people aren't affected by how Trump harms those people, they aren't going to change how they feel about those people. And even a swing against Trump due to his economics harming voters won't matter if we don't even get to vote in 2028.

The only way I see anything changing is that the boomers die of old age. My own generation (millenials) are more compassionate, but have basically been hamstrung by an older generation that has kept all the money and power. And honestly, I'm not sure we'll do much better when the boomers die--we're cynical, and tired from living our entire adult lives in this bullshit, and on average just content if we can survive. Gen Z seems on average to have even more compassion than millenials, and some more nuanced understandings of how to treat our fellow humans well, and seem to still want something better for themselves, so my hope is on them.
I use it. It's great!

I'm native English but native Japanese are super fast. It's like watching a speed cuber
AFAIK GrapheneOS flashes everything from fastboot (i.e. no recovery step). Implementing adb sideload protocol shouldn’t be too tricky though.
Can product recommendation sites place a funny video on their website, unrelated to products, just so readers can have a little rest while doing all this product comparison?

Can product recommendation sites _pay_ a video creator to create a funny video for their website? It's a win-win for everyone, right? Product recommendation website gets more visitors, popular creator gets money, and visitors get to see a funny video from popular creator.

If you allow ads on product recommendation websites, most entertainment websites will declare themselves "product recommendation".
T9 was single tap per letter and an internal dictionary would figure out which letter you meant, then 0 would cycle between possible matching words, with the last option falling back to the more common multi-tap input you're thinking of (which I don't recall ever having its own name) to add to the dictionary.
It will give enormous power to the monopolies. Because you'll no longer be able to advertise your product, but search on marketplaces will still be legal right? That means, Amazon, Alibaba etc. will have an absolute chokehold on everyone who sells things.
no regulations are written by specialists and staff that implement the intent of the law passed by legislature or by executive order. Voting only pressures certain parts of that. The US and States have had large scandals regarding heavy industrial wastes over time.
Your experience seems statistically unlikely
Stallman’s insistence that a judge would side with him is pretty arrogant in my opinion; eg looking at Oracle v. Google decades later and how folks deciding the case seemed to be confused about technical matters.
I would leave too, but I'd have to abandon a couple loved ones
Which has nothing to do with the situation at all, does it?
Qwerty is the lowest cognitive lift.

Most tech people really don't understand how valuable "not learning shit" is to a product's success
Blindsight is remarkable for its exploration of what intelligent life without consciousness might be like.

For me personally I was amazed that one of the lead characters is a vampire. I'm completely burned out on vampire stories yet Watts made one I very much enjoyed. Even if you're also bored with vampires, I recommend you try this book.
ISPs, at least in the US, already offer free email hosting.. they used to offer basic web hosting too, not sure if that's still the case.

Using those is worst idea ever. ISPs are all horrible, and the only good thing is you can switch to the other one. The last thing you want is to tie your email/website, something you can't easily change, to them.
> In reality, we’re standing at a fork in the path: one where we can either embrace the (currently) far-off notion of fully automated software development or, instead, acknowledge the work of a software developer is much more than just writing lines of code.

I see a lot of optimism that is fundamentally based on "the code" being important and everyone saying "my bad" and going back to paying lots of developers and they all get 2x - 3x more than everyone else.

I don't think the jobs are coming back at all. Companies will just keep optimizing to spend the least on development they can, spend the least during uncertain times they can, and they will just lower expectations while waiting for AI to catch up. The future is very small number of people coaxing stuff out of AI.

IMHO developers should be making products and AI should be filling these roles for you to produce products without a company supporting you. AI should be taking your solo-software to the next level. That's what AI is doing for the collective "them", and the reason "them" is doing it is because there are 2 - 3 billion people who can buy stuff online. Your digital products are also stuff they can buy online.
I say this shit all the time.
Are you in an open office? I found that to be extremely fatiguing relative to a private office, a shared office, or even a cubicle.
Kind of surprising that the Oracle deal would have killed it given that Jobs and Ellison were such close friends.
Wow, this, if real is big.

------------
The effect of short-term (≤5 min) exposure to a pure tone of 80–85 dBZ (= 60.9–65.9 dBA) at 100 Hz on motion sickness was investigated in mice and humans.
-------------
Very easy to producw, safe and not invasive. Just download a signal generator app on your phone and you could quickly test this.

Excited to see if it helps my partner.
Ironically, your comment would be illustrative of Dunning Kruger, if it really showed what you're claiming.

The Dunning Kruger study never said that stupid people believed they were smarter than smart people, or that they outperformed the high performers. All it said is that the underperformers overestimated their performance, but they still believed they did worse than the high performers.

You don't have to believe me. It's clearly shown on the Wikipedia page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effec...
If advertising isn't a service, why do so many people pay for this, uh, "non-service"?
Not after a lot longer either; I was present for some attempts at social security and tax system rewrites in my country and they failed (massive write offs that sparked scandals); they are massive, mainframe systems with many decades of changes. I think 'understanding' the current system would be a bit of a problem.
Even for a blackboard, what if it is a paid employee that writes on it? Is it required for the owner to write it themselves?

For that matter, would it be prohibited for employees to promote any product in any way?
Perhaps just banning algorithmic advertising would be enough?
It's actually really easy, you're not allowed to be compensated for your speech. It's free.
Provides a moderately-configured starting point for new cloud VM deployments without requiring custom images
My roommate comes in and talks, and while they're doing that I automatically start cleaning my room. I am a slob otherwise. But something about that, it gives me a chance to be away from "online" while also giving me a sort of mental "space"/distraction so I'm not focused/anxious/worried and seems to help me reduce my "executive dysfunction". I also have a tendency to place self-demands and so it makes me doing things I want to do (not like cleaning room but projects) more difficulty because I feel the pressure to do it, so I resist. Having someone in the room helps me relax that self-demand. I don't "should" I just "do".

I used to do a lot more socially and my computer was in the living room with the roomie, but I'm just in my room most of the time, and this is making me think - maybe I should go back to the living room with my computer (since she's out there too most days), maybe that will help me be more productive in programming/projects, etc...
It would fit jobs though.

That’s one of the famous rumors.

As others here have said Oracle bought Sun two years later. Between me increased memory requirements, uncertainty due to Sun’s status as an ongoing concern, and who knows what else maybe it really did make sense not to go forward.