skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because you just want an editor and Obsidian is not an editor?
Why not open a modal dialog instead?
What analysis has shown that people are not doing this? All I have seen is that there aren't a significant number of convictions, but that doesn't really hold wait if you aren't actually trying to catch/prevent people from doing it. If it never happened, there wouldn't be a standard well known practice of casting a provisional ballot if you have already "voted".
These are but pricey bug bounties. This will lead to a more efficient and secure cryptocurrency market, as participants will insist on better financial controls, threatening to flee to the regulated fiat markets if their needs are not met. /s
Your boss can know about it, but if their boss wants data on performance you’re back in the same boat.

Funny you mention engineers needing to market themselves though. That leads to its own consequences. I’ve been at a place where everyone needed to market their own work in order to get promoted, to get raises, and to stay off the chopping block.

The end result? The engineers at the company who get promoted are… good at self-promotion, not necessarily good at engineering. Many of the best engineers at the company—who were hired to do engineering—languish in obscurity while people who can game the system thrive. People get promoted who are only good at cranking out poorly-made deliverables that burden their team with excessive long-term maintenance issues. They fuck off to higher levels of the company, leaving their team to deal with the consequences of their previous work.

Run that script for five or ten years and it doesn’t seem to be working out well for the company.
The killer app is crime. Old scams have flourished. Entire new forms of scam have been invented. Crypto currency has been a game changer for criminal organizations.
Unfortunately the "open"AI effect is starting to show in other labs as well. DeepMind recently announced a min 6months delay in publishing their SotA research, to give them a market advantage. I get it, but it's sad that it's happening.

The good thing is that there are a lot of companies out there that want to make a name for themselves. Mistral started like that with Apache 2.0 models, now ds w/ MIT models, and so on. And if the past year is a good indicator, it seems that closed SotA to open close-to-SotA is 6-3 months. So that's good.

I also find interesting LeCun's take that "there is no closed source moat, or not for long". In a podcast he went into detail on this, saying that "people move companies, and people talk". If someone finds some secret sauce, the ideas will move around and other labs will catch up quickly. So there's some hope.
I interpret "our policy doesn't allow it" as "I don't want to work here".
Different kind of animal. A lot less reach into the older generations and a lot less control of the content.
In Localhost We Trust
>transparent trustless global ledger that can't be hacked

51% attack says it isn't
Ovyl | https://ovyl.io | On Site Nashville, TN (in office 2-3 days/week)

We are a growing hardware product development company based in Nashville. We develop products holistically - we have User Researchers, Industrial Designers, Mechanical Engineers, Electrical / Hardware Engineers, and Firmware Engineers.
The types of products we work on range from commercial IoT, medical devices, and consumer electronics.

Open positions https://ovyl.io/studio#jobs:

- Lead Project Manager
- Senior Mechanical Engineer (will go live this week)
And there are tons. Epic, EA, Ubi Play - they are pretty shitty.

Gog is the only one I would say is on par with Steam, but they have a different niche. Still, Valve is on top and not because they hinder the competition, but because the competition likes to shoot their feet. Often.
That is general knowledge, but if you really want to go down that way of "where did you get this narrative from" to try and avoid the subject. Well, you can see it, for instance, in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy for starters. [1]

[1] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/art-definition/
Isn’t rationalism (as discussed above) more closely related to utilitarianism? Thus rationalism is more of a consequentialist framework than a deontological one?
Globalization is fine. Wages in this country are quite high overall. Inequality isn't caused by trade, it's caused by low taxes on rich people, weak unions, and weak labor regulation.

The terrible state of US production is a myth. The US is the second largest manufacturer in the world. The #1 spot is occupied by a country with over 4x our population. Manufacturing employment is down because our manufacturing productivity is really high. Yeah, we don't assemble smartphones or make plastic trinkets. We make cars and jetliners and computer chips.

If you want to address the national debt and inequality, the solution is to correct the power imbalance between employers and employees by strengthening labor regulations and unions, and to raise taxes, especially on high incomes, and especially on the super wealthy. Taxing people like Elon Musk down to a more manageable 10 or 11 figures of net worth won't do a lot for the nation's finances directly, but it will do a lot to curb their power and get the government to be more responsive to our interests instead of theirs.

(And no, tariffs are not a good way to do this, since they're regressive.)
One thing does not prevent the other: that's what standards are for.
The Fed has two mandates: maximum employment & stable prices. If prices go up, the Fed is mandated to raise interest rate.
"... is called a delusion". What I am suggesting is not delusion, it is mindfulness and cutting through delusion. When one is presented with something that elicits a fear response (whether the stimulus is rational or not) the goal is to quiet all of the "lizard brain" reactions, and instead formulate a well reasoned response. "Fear is the mind-killer" - while from fiction, still rings true to me - if you react out of fear you will short-circuit internal processes that are far better at long-term reasoning even when at the expense of short-term comfort.
Looking at this, I do not understand how people can be bearish about LLMs.
This is the only promise that cryptocurrency held. Avoid government barriers. So we should celebrate the fact that it was not a complete scam.
No, it's not a desirable end state. If we produced everything in the US — just assuming we had magic tech to make it possible - we'd have less and be poorer. Americans today live like kings from 200 years ago, in large part due to global trade.
come on, $26 per 50g. it is like someone trying to sell you the full ownership of OpenAI for $1 billion USD in H1 2025.
We do not have to be net exporters of coffee - Indonesia can buy US cars, corn and wheat for example to balance trade.
Surely we must rid ourselves from a story with any finality, as it stands, we reach for something, but we've no idea what.

For most people, a better life is a life where their children are healthy, nourished, well-educated and living in peace (technology be damned). More importantly, for most people, a better life for themselves is one of extremely little, basic food, peace, community, movement.

All those children grow up to find what makes them happy is less, not more. We all know it. It's the intangibles, not the material. It's the people, our pets, the sun shining and a bird singing.

The end isn't worth the means, maybe instead of looking for some quant to see it all, we could just see ourselves and move forward slowly with what we know to be good and true, without falling on our face trying to punch a baby.
The advice wasn't for you, in your cube your job is to make them money.

For everyone, peak performance is achieved with physical health and mental health, so working out and non-work brain-boosters like playing music or racing bikes are crucial.
No, tax increases will not create better jobs to backfill the ones moved overseas by globalization.
I really want to read a good response to this comment. I have the same questions, and I’ll add one more thought.

Lots of people talk about how the US should be more like Europe. People say the average European has a better quality of life, etc. Well, Europe has tariffs…
Perhaps, we are mixing 2 things:

1) Economic/Monetary Inflation, which is an increase in the money supply in an economy driven by government or central bank ("print money").

2) Price Inflation, which is an increase in the general price level of goods and services that people typically notice at the groceries or gas and usually derives from monetary inflation, but can also be due to the new tariffs.

Is the Fed going to do the same confusion and use 2 to justify higher rates for longer?

I think they shouldn't unless they're being disingenuous and politically motivated (push just enough to make the entire Trump mandate an unending crisis until Democrats get back in power).
You can believe in democracy all you want, but disenfranchisement really has a way of undermining it.
India can grow at 10% but import substitution policy could hurt that, Arvind Panagariya says https://theprint.in/theprint-otc/india-can-grow-at-10-but-im...
Ask HN: Interviewing at this point feels unfair due to cheaters. What now?
How do you all feel about interviewing and being compared against people that are straight up cheating with the rise of these tools that are hidden during screensharing?

I don't even want to interview anymore until I know a company does theirs in-person now. People have always been cheaters/liars to begin with, but now it's doubly worse with this new tool that blew up on twitter. It's extremely unfair for me to study my ass off only to be in a pool full of people who didn't do it fairly. Anyone else feeling this way?
It refers to the “Endlösung” of the Jew problem in Nazi germany.
Sure, in the same way that a primary use case of cash is that somebody can punch you in the face and take your money and whatever you can get away with is allowed.
Why isn't CC-by-NC-ND adequate for code? Kinda makes sense IMO and the summary looks useful?

> CC-BY-NC-ND is a type of Creative Commons license that allows others to use a work non-commercially, but they cannot modify it or create derivative works. This means the original work can be shared, but it must remain unchanged and cannot be used for commercial purposes.

Notwithstanding it's only applied to the data in this case, it sure looks like a useful license for code.
IMO it was technology allowing more viewpoints to be expressed. First with more than 3 TV stations, then of course the internet. Before that transition, everyone was mostly part of one tribe, because mass media was mostly homogeneous. After, it was increasingly easy to find tribes that fit your exact viewpoints, and reject other sources of information
Location: Europe (Turin, Italy)
Remote: Worldwide can adapt to timezone, can also travel if needed ofr hybrid.
Willing to relocate: Yes but in a July 2026!
Technologies: Python, Kubernetes, Asp.Net, React, ELK and many more
Résumé/CV: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RlscJr5Lv9oooa0hW14Xz_zoAQP...
Email: elias.thouant <at> gmail.com
One thing we know for sure Trump will never back down or admit he’s wrong. So how to invest in this 4 year regime to survive or even thrive?
> It's statements like this that make me question the intellectual honesty of people. It doesn't take much thinking to understand it, right?

It isn't a matter of intellectual honesty. People who think assault rifles should be banned don't necessarily believe that you shouldn't be able to protect yourself. (It doesn't take much thinking to understand that, right?)

The issues are much more complicated and intertwined than people are willing to deal with, making it easy to fall back on a couple simple ideas like "don't kill unborn life" and "let me have an AR-15 to protect myself." But when you start digging into the ramifications of unwanted children, the social programs required to support them, the impact on the parents, etc.; and what it means to let every tom/dick/harry own and carry whatever weapon they want, even if there's a background check and mandatory training; you get into details for which there is no clear best, or even good, solution. We do have reality to deal with.

People only have so much energy to spend on understanding issues that don't affect them personally, and different people are affected by different issues. So of course there will be wide gaps between perspectives and how those perspectives are expressed. That doesn't mean anyone is being intellectually dishonest.
To add to the other comments: do you really have a right to whatever it is that the bits unlocked by that key represent? Who granted you that? AFAICT, it's the systems running the blockchain that grants you that, and it's not governed by any contract outside the blockchain.
I dabbled with this kind of issue in my docs and ended up using JavaScript's Intersection Observer [0]. It's not a perfect solution [1], but I think it worked well enough [2]. It just identifies when the element comes on screen and then marks it as active however you please. I do appreciate the depth the article went into though!

[0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Intersectio...
[1] https://github.com/keybittech/awayto-v3/blob/main/landing/la...
[2] https://awayto.dev/docs/0.3.0/
I just spent too much time today arguing with ChatGPT that the nutritional information it gave me for pearl barley seemed off. It couldn’t reason whether it was for cooked pearl barley or not. Having had a look online, it’s no wonder.
Sure, but crypto millionaires are acting like they’re billionaires.
Completely agree. This is a great insight. IMHO part of the growth of a programmer is learning how the code fits the context, and a large part of that is writing less code, not more, or getting rid of some entirely.
Agreed there are serious restructuring that needs to happen in the US.

That said this approach doesn't make a lot of sense. There are many ways to do this without antagonizing all of your allies which only helps out your enemies and ostracizes the U.S.

Loss of confidence in the greenback is deeply problematic for US power.
It's a stupid question, the whole point of this article is to point out it's not in our control. Sure it's technically in our control but in reality most of us don't seem interested in filling all the necessary jobs to run our own society. We tried it, everything started falling apart, and we fell back on immigration again.

A better question would be, would you be willing to become a lorry driver or a cleaner etc to reduce immigration. Then vote with a job application, you'd get a totally different result that reflects economic reality. If you don't work by choice you don't get a vote (beggers can't be choosers), if you have a fancy job you have a choice you probably won't take. If pensioners don't like it they should complain to their grandkids to go be lorry drivers.

If you frame the Moon as a villain and ask if we should remove it, of course people will say yes. Doesn't make it any less nonsensical though.
Tax corporations and the wealthy since they receive the majority of the benefits. They benefit from a trained healthy workforce, social safety nets, infrastructure like roads and electricity and water. They benefit form the US dollar being the reserve currency for most of the world. I literally cannot list all the ways these two groups benefit in a real tangible outsized way than any other individual.

Trump wants to eliminate all federal taxes. That's NOT going to reduce the deficit. The current republican spending bill includes a 4.5T tax cut to the wealthy and businesses, while cutting only 2T in spending from entitlements WE PAY INTO SEPARATE FROM TAXES. I am entitled to the money that me and my employer pay into Social Security, it's an investment, not a tax.

Let's stop taking from working people who are quickly falling further and further into poverty and start taking from the people who literally own everything!
At the risk of sounding smug, obviously. Whether or not something is fair use has never been related to how it was obtained, only how it's used.

Fair use is an affirmative, after-the-fact defense.
Oh, I agree. I was just pointing out we have some, and it's going to get a lot more expensive now.
Our ruling class and the idiot scammers in power sold our country out. They should be the ones you get mad at.
Right that’s why I’m wondering why the OP included it in a sentence along with “dropping” that implied the laptop had “been through some stuff”.
No offense, but this is a silly argument. Companies in country X tend to develop their products in conformance with country X. Of course, products developed in the EU will conform with EU law. By the same token, I would be surprised if US companies habitually developed products that don't conform with US law.

> It's not that they "don't bother", it's that they understand complying with the regulation to cost them more than the fine.

This means that the fines are not high enough and don't fulfill their purpose. That's an argument for the thesis that the EU is handling fines of violators in a too lax fashion, not the opposite. This has also been the impression of many EU citizens, and it seems to be the reason why so many huge US corporations keep violating EU customer protection rules again and again.

But the reality is also that US companies that violated those rules basically have no EU competition because the EU has an abysmal market in certain tech domains. There simply are no viable EU equivalents to Apple, Google, Facebook, and Microsoft.
No, this is explicitly what the Republican Party platform is.

If you have any doubts, please read Project 2025. Most of this is extremely explicit and impossible to ignore. Of course, most conservatives will still try to ignore it because nobody wants to admit they might have made a mistake.
No one will want to do lower income jobs while the cost of living is high and continues to rise. Wear and tear on the body is also not compensated, not to mention healthcare being expensive. Meanwhile, I do CRUD apps and work remotely 20/hours a week with no bodily harm (on the contrary, I have time to work out and make bad posts on HN)

No one in their right mind is going to choose manufacturing over what I have if they can do both, and most people could honestly learn to do CRUD apps. Even if my salary were to go down by 5-10% yoy due to people moving in, I'm still in a better position for the other reasons mentioned. I'd have to be below manufacturing and blue collar wages to get me to switch.

The only sensible explanation is that they're trying to force people to have to take these jobs by crashing the globalized parts of the economy because they are obviously better than starving and dying homeless.

All this assuming that Trump isn't just intentionally trying to destroy the country.
If you're not familiar with MUDs than perhaps a system based on "being a MUD" just isn't aimed at you?
Eh, I really do call BS on that.

Umberto Eco's 14 tenants of fascism still stands strong and is highly visible in modern discourse.
Exactly. The Zimbabwe model
These would be inherently temporary problems though right? If it became eventually clear that alternate methods were the way forward, NVDIA would be highly motivated to do the optimization work wouldn't they? Any new step functions that can forestall the asymptotic plateauing of AI progress are things they desperately need.
I remember implementing the same thing in our framework like a decade ago, but eventually taking it out. We wanted to use it for caching data between tabs, so as not to hit the server again per tab:

https://github.com/Qbix/Platform/blob/main/platform/plugins/...

It had the concept of a “main frame” that they would route all requests to the server through.

I remember now — I did it not so much for tabs as for our solution of having tons of little iframes on a page: https://qbix.com/ecosystem
Not at all. We'd be much poorer in that world. Comparative advantage is a thing.
When I first read the K&R book, that syntax made perfectly sense. They are building up to it through a few chapters, if I remember correctly.

What has changed is that nowadays most developers aren't doing low-level programming anymore, where the building blocks of that expression (or the expression itself) would be common idioms.
Seems pretty wild to me that their definition of "AI expert" is "authors and presenters at 21 AI-related conferences held in 2023 or 2024... The list included conferences focused on technical AI research; social science about AI; the representativeness and ethics of AI; the business of AI; and the specific applications of AI in health care, finance and government."
> people who own mines, oil wells, farms, etc.

Huge swaths of midwestern farmers will go bankrupt if tariffs are imposed. Subsidies and exemptions are being specifically added to prevent the complete collapse of multiple red state economies due to the harm from the tariffs.

Even things like oil and mines aren't guaranteed safe, because of complexities around where refineries are, loss of export market, or weakness of dollar offsetting any nominal gains when looking at actual purchasing power.
Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer, Mark Cuban....they're not like this. Granted it's a pathetically short list.
Are we surprised? If anyone watched the presidential debates VP Kamala Harris told us about this.

From September 2024:

"What Goldman Sachs has said is that Donald Trump's plan would make the economy worse. Mine would strengthen the economy. What the Wharton School has said is Donald Trump's plan would actually explode the deficit. Sixteen Nobel laureates have described his economic plan as something that would increase inflation and by the middle of next year would invite a recession."

Emphasis on that last line:

would increase inflation and by the middle of next year would invite a recession.

btw the US Congress can stop this anytime they want.
Just flip them.
Because most working web developers actually have no idea how to write JS; they follow what is presented (perpetuated) as industry standard practice, but in a React-and-NPM world, "industry standard practice" means bad practices.

Previously:

<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24218967>

<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33794755>
Is there going to be a hearing into the stock transactions of any the cabinet related to this news? Seems to me like some people could make some significant money on information like this.
> sectors like the military, construction and the automotive industry each have 100K+ positions that they are unable to fill. A return to manufacturing adds to that shortage.

Feel free to offer higher wages than the previous stagnant wages.
In fairness, NK is not rich - perhaps slightly less poor...
Not EU weapons manufacturing and defence industry.
For me, the switch is the only console I trust to leave my kids alone with. Nintendo builds great games for kids, but you pay for them. I mean, launch games like Mario Odysee and Breath of the Wild are still sold at full price, years later.
Yes, but if they let get into a debt spiral, the only solution becomes devaluation of the dollar to the point of hyperinflation. Only then debt is reduced, but it would be terrible for everybody except a few.
Believe it or not but there are Americans who relinquish their passport precisely because of this reason.
Patriotism is automatically assumed but we live in a globalised world.
Interestingly the Macbook trackpad does not have physical buttons. It uses haptic feedback to simulate the feeling of a "click", but in reality there is no button which could be interrupted by dust.

I did have a Macbook trackpad fail in a similar way, where the "button" seemed to intermittently fail to click. It turned out my battery was swelling (see /r/spicypillows) and this impacted the trackpad operation.

On topic, I took the Macbook with swollen battery in to the Apple Store and they had to replace the entire keyboard+battery assembly as a unit because the battery was not replaceable.