skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I still don't understand where the anger is coming from. Why does it piss you off that I want to argue child sexual abuse is more common and more of a problem than it's broadly acknowledged to be? Are you assuming I mean to use that claim as an argument against porn or something? I really can't figure out what's gotten so far up your nose on this, and I wish I could because it's really making it impossible for us to have a conversation.

It's pretty simple honestly, any online discussion about pornography has turned into a complete and total clown show and it has become increasingly obvious that people who are arguing are doing so in bad faith.

I don't know what previous conversations we've had, as I spend far too much time on this damned website and have probably made tens of thousands of comments, but I kind of had a bad feeling the moment I saw your first comment because I had a pretty good feeling you knew what sources people were referring to and decided to play it as if you didn't, for one reason or another. I can see strategically why one would do this when the data seems to contradict the conclusion you have drawn so unilaterally, but at the same time, it's an annoying strategy. It's like laying a trap.

I really don't like this sort of discussion thread:

> Oh, it would be great news if incidence of CSA has gone down. Care to link to a source?

> Sure, here: [d2l link]

> Ah, but, you see, that talks about prevalence, not incidence. [...]

Because you knew what direction it was going to go all along. Playing coy here feels like theatrics.

If I took your position, I'd probably go more along the lines of:

> I am aware of the abundance of studies that discuss the prevelance of CSA, but [...]

(And I'm sure people would probably downvote that, but also, I get downvoted any time I respond in one of these types of threads, so it wouldn't make any difference to me.)

Anyway, the truth is that when I saw your first post, I didn't know what type of trap was being set, but my expectations were pretty low. The actual nuance you brought up is more interesting than that, but still not something I really care to debate.
While that is definitely true, you can ignore it and choose local options. I often try to ask locals where they go to eat. Most people are excited to share a recommendation or two and why they like it.

Another thing I do, is avoid online menues at least ahead of visiting a spot and make my selections once I arrive. I can't say it's better, but it definitely keeps the serendipitous and suspense that I remember from my younger years before everything was online and had a million reviews.
There's no "that" after FYI. It's "For your information, <foo>"

Sorry, but FYI this is my biggest pet peeve of all time.
> In no other nation-state on earth would somebody like Musk be provided with taxpayer funds to derail plans for high-speed trains by pursuing a non-working vanity project

With you until this. China has built its fair share of nonsense vanity infrastructure to the point of entire cities. The difference isn’t the tendency to fever dream. It’s that China actually gets around to the building of it. Both in controlling its billionaires and suppressing NIMBYism, its model looks like an attractive one for developing countries to replicate (versus the American or European models).
Edit: Analyzed the wrong thing earlier.

This depends on the Python version, but if it has the specializing interpreter changes, the `COMPARE_OP` comparing the integers there is probably hitting a specialized `_COMPARE_OP_INT` [1].

This specialization has a ternary that does
`res = (sign_ish & oparg) ? PyStackRef_True : PyStackRef_False;`.
This might be the branch that ends up getting predicted correctly?

Older versions of Python go through a bunch of dynamic dispatch first and then end up with a similar sort of int comparison in `long_richcompare`. [2]

[1] https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/561965fa5c8314dee5b86...

[2] https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/561965fa5c8314dee5b86...
Only when there are no roadrunners to be found.
They're only counting "publicly accessible" EV charging stations. There are probably 10X as many EV charging stations that aren't publicly accessible, aka in somebody's garage. Or millions of times more EV charging stations if you consider that a standard 120V outlet is capable of charging a car.
I wish they were larger. I'd keep one and feed it rats & geckos.
Well he needs the public not to vote in a bunch of democrats in the midterms. And, if his MAGA movement is going to live on in Vance or others after his term, he will need public support.
I am not working 40 hours a week so although equality seems fair I don't really like your idea.
So having a low crime rate is more important than keeping innocent people out of jail?
This is my favorite introductory machine learning theory (statistical learning theory) book, which is far more accessible than many others.
I'm an early adopter and long time user of the Tap Strap [1] and the TapXR [2], they solved for me the same OP's aspirations ;)

There is some room for improvement, but it really works, flawlessly [3].

[1] https://www.tapwithus.com/how-tapxr-works/

[2] https://www.tapwithus.com/product/tap-xr/

[3] https://www.tapwithus.com/how-tapxr-works/
Fair enough, though I’d argue that it’s difficult to get much closer to the real thing without signing a contract. As the old lie goes, “Dulce et decorum est, Pro Controller mori.”
Yep — this project uses a pre-trained DocLayout-YOLO model released under an open license by the original authors. No additional datasets were used for training.
All sample data in the repo is either synthetic, publicly available, or user-generated specifically for testing purposes.
If there are any concerns about specific models or datasets, I’m happy to review them and make adjustments as needed.
Other than the `hetzner-k3s` installer, nothing in the article is specific to Hetzner. And even that script is just some terraform presets.

Spoiler for people who actually care about TFA: it's a runaway win for k3s. I've never even heard of minikube being run in production. The setup stuff at the end is a complete handwave though, like "Implement Traefik ingress with Let’s Encrypt via servers.ingress.enabled=true". No serious setup works well with traefik's default LE integration, and even the k3s docs recommend you install cert-manager. Which isn't too awful to set up, but it's still several hours of fiddling if you haven't done it before (pro tip: install it with kubectl, do not use helm. helm and CRDs are still not friends.)
Yeah it needs a lot of micro though.
The problem is that you will have more moving parts - a web server, and an additional reverse proxy (which can add overhead).
Also, Ferron can also be configured as a reverse proxy.
This is a winning comment IMO. Trump is like a random walk with a high multiplier.

Tariffs could go away on Monday… or inexplicably be doubled.
As someone who generally opposes Bukele on an ideological level, I'm not even that mad about the mass sweeps themselves. The way things were going before, it was obvious a drastic solution was needed.

It's the CECOT conditions and the boasting about cruel treatment that I'm unhappy about. At this point it's plain torture, and I believe it's wrong to torture people, even if those people are themselves torturers or worse.
Well for starters they could've not voted on the spending bill and reversed exactly what the conservatives would do constantly under Obama, not until getting at least some kind of serious concession, while painting it as republicans being unwilling to compromise.

Similarly, only a handful of democrats (and ex-democrats) are actually doing anything to make big public statements, to direct people as to what a useful usage of their energies could be.

Oh, and they could do things like not put David Hogg as a vice chair in a way that not only looks corrupt, but far more importantly has absolutely no strategic sense at all -- who asked for that guy?! He's looked like a complete idiot at virtually every debate he's been to, believes in virtually nothing except total gun control conveyed in a sanctimonious, tactless, trivially hateable manner that instantly alienates many americans who might be willing to listen to nearly anyone else in context of all that's going on... I could keep going, the point is this is a guy with absolutely no redeeming qualities except his well-off family with a father in the FBI, which just confirms narratives while not even providing an otherwise competent person.

Most importantly though, they don't know how to fix their behavior or optics as a conservative-lite party that only moves to the right now, that only "compromises" by giving ground for nothing in return.

If you're a socialist

If you're LGBTQ

If you're an environmentalist

If you're single-issue on healthcare

If you're bothered by the situation in Palestine

If you're a voting reformer

If you're any one of these things

Then you have NOTHING at this point, just a party where people who tried to speak for you and usually did so tactlessly and poorly, then started blaming you for the election saying "if only we were a little more conservative! Then we would have won the election!"

Sorry for the rather rambling post, but I think it should do a good job of expressing the core anger and dissatisfaction that's being felt, and why they're both not doing enough + look unpalatable to a huge chunk of their own voters now.
Doesn’t Microsoft handicap extensions by not giving them the full access that co-pilot gets? You’d be crazy to compete when the other side literally owns the platform.
People who lie and cheat often justify themselves by asserting that everyone does. It’s easier than admitting you’re a liar and a cheat and changing your ways.
SpacetimeDB v1.0: Multiplayer at the speed of light
I think anyone who is innocent but in jail probably misses the right to a fair trial.
Without sarcasm, that's great. Now what is there to prevent me from scrolling up and down on a 16:9 display to read the left column of a 10k letter text and then the right column?

I see it has "length" and "min/max-content" properties... even if there are sufficiently many <p>aragraphs (for vertical splitting), inevitably enough paragraphs will be single column due short length. So it becomes a mix and match between "here we were able to split into columns, and here you get a full width single column text flow"?

PS: Oh and don't get me on the CSS used to determine mobile layouts. My 9:16 4K often enough triggers that degraded experience of mobile.
Musk's antics (and those of Bezos and other subsidy enjoyers) have also legitimized the Chinese approach to state subsidies. They're for the most part financing things that advance the whole nation's interests, not just the delusional follies of a connected few.
> Canada will settle with China to avoid a two front war

The wild thing is it may be in Canada’s interest to seek security guarantees from China at this point.
This is an interesting observation.

The difference between code completion, intellisense and AI coding, is that code completion merely gives you the name of a variable or a function, while AI coding thinks for you, which is really bad.

That's why I despise Copilot and other AI tools that are embedded in IDEs. I'm OK with ChatGPT because it is in a different window and I'm much inclined to use it -- and when I use it I try not to let ChatGPT think for me, but things like Copilot tries to get into my coding.
Thanks, that was essentially the test. I've gotten into a number of disagreements with people on HN about whether LLMs are 'just' token predictors, whether they 'understand' (whatever we mean by that), whether there's a guiding intelligence, whether they're 'just' language calculators, etc.

As someone else in this thread nicely put it, the tools are being sold as a hop, skip, and jump away from AGI. They clearly aren't. ChatGPT tells us to "ask anything." I did that. There is no 'there' there with these tools. They aren't even dumb.
Yes, rare Chinese characters do show up in the training data (the rarest of them at least appear in lists of characters) and yes, they get tokenized as weird byte sequences, making the model work harder to process them, but it's better for that to happen to rare characters than to common words. It's a tradeoff.

And of course UTF-8 is unlikely to be the single best encoding (e.g. Anthropic has a tokenizer that turns all caps text into a special caps lock symbol plus the regular-case equivalent) but much of it is papered over by byte-pair encoding. E.g. the most important Latin letters appear often enough that they get dedicated tokens anyways.
Here's a fun way that this project could be applied: Take a phone that has pretty good hardware support for postmarketOS. Install a bare bones pmOS image, plus this version of QEMU, and boot iOS on and Android phone. It probably would be possible to further customize QEMU to forward all the phone hardware (modem, Bluetooth, etc.) into the iOS VM.
but that's the thing. Its not novel. As in, I am inventing something. I see a gap and opportunity and began to execute.

I am worried about AI because it has reduced the entry barriers. Much easier now to write code or atleast build MVP and get traction.
and that makes me question whether all this effort is futile if the only things giving me an edge os the early start.
> You make money on your laptop which you then trade for a variety of goods from actual producers

Isn't that actually also a good analogy for the way the US produces a lot of money "on its laptop" (service industry) and imports "actual" goods like consumer items from overseas?
You wouldn’t be able to post there as an American.
The distinction indeed needs to be drawn carefully, because as I understand you, you're not describing an "other side" compared to journalism - you're describing a thin intermediary layer between journalism and the kind of outlets like e.g. Top Gear, that let people treat them as a lighthearted but factual source, then occasionally do a hit job on something or someone, and when damage they did is pointed out, proclaim "but we are an entertainment program, not news, so we don't have any obligation to be factual and accurate!".

Because of such cases, when I see someone (like you here) argue "X is not a journalist, Y is not a news program", my mind automatically pattern-matches this to ", therefore it has no obligation to tell the truth, despite the fact that they let people believe they're journalists/news". Which is not what you meant here, but common enough that I doubt this is just mine knee-jerk reaction.
Yes, what do you mean? The biggest climate effect at the moment is human carbon use, which is changing weather patterns, and the cause of the cloud shrinkage is changing weather patterns => cloud shrinkage is driven, to some degree (I would guess strongly, but let's be careful, so some degree) by human carbon extraction.
The price of an iphone has remained constant over the past ~20 years. It's arguably already fairly cheap for a device that is so important for everything we do (especially considering that there is marginal benefit to upgrading every year these days and an iphone from 5 years ago still functions fine)
I'm completely lost.

You raise sources I've never seen, I evaluate them as fairly as I can, you don't like the result so I'm arguing in bad faith.

I mentioned incidence, one source raised to try to counter not only relates to prevalence rather than incidence but explains why this matters, but when I point out that a source you chose itself disclaims support for how you want to use it, I'm arguing in bad faith.

I still don't even know what kind of pernicious dishonesty I'm meant to be advancing here, but sure, if you like then apparently I'm setting some kind of trap, in service of good God, I still don't know what.

I don't know who you imagine yourself to be at war with here, but whoever you're talking to clearly isn't me, so...I don't know, good luck with the rest of your day, I guess. You're not wrong we both have better ways to spend our time, at least.
If Docker Swarm is on the table (it's practically abandonware), I'd like to throw in Nomad by HashiCorp. It's also fairly lightweight, very flexible (can run various types of containers but also exec any executable), decent ecosystem (supports CNI and CSI). It can scale from single node control plane + workloads to tens of thousands of nodes, and the workers can also be geographically spread out (different regions/zones/dcs).

A few years back I wrote about it, and most of the core principles of the article are still valid:

https://atodorov.me/2021/02/27/why-you-should-take-a-look-at...

Disclaimer: I work at HashiCorp, but I've had that opinion since before joining and in fact it's among the reasons I joined
> Based on that prediction, the top-of-the-line iPhone 16 Pro Max model with 1TB of storage could rise from $1,599 to nearly $2,300 in the U.S., should Apple actually follow through with raising prices by 43% to offset the cost of tariffs.

That… seems fine? An iPhone 16 Pro Max with 1TB is 1,979 euro on the French Apple store, or about $2,169. Somehow the French manage?
I doubt there was a direct inspiration in either direction beside contributing to overall pool of ideas around wearable input devices. Only commonality I see is that they are both handheld/glove like computer input devices. Nerds and sci-fi authors have been dreaming about stuff like that since the beginning of personal computers in ~1970s-1980s if not earlier. There are plenty of other examples which could have been inspiration. Even the 2000 patent, references dozen older patents for handheld or glove like input devices some of which are much closer to the 2006 movie.

Looking at the history of wearable electronics can't forget about Steve Mann and all his crazy prototypes long before 2000.

Most well known movie examples are probably Minority report(2002) and The Wizard(1989) which showed Nintendo power glove.
or they could've... taxed wealth. But the broligarchs who control trump wouldn't be ok with that.
Sure; but so is pretty much anything we do with animals.

Is it worse than the cattle industry? Worse than re-introducing wolves to Yellowstone? Worse than engineering mosquitoes to be sterile? They all have their cost.

This cost is measured in African elephant abuse. A sound argument. The ecosystem argument, not so much as they also elaborate competently on.

Let's admit, the single reason to 'bring back' the Mammoth is, it's cool and a tremendous publicity scheme for ecological efforts. That alone, may be reason enough.

And, anything that brings in the dollars is going to happen. Argue all you want, about ecology and seed dispersal and other 'real' effects. The money a Mammoth park would bring, the imaginations stimulated and the youth inspired, could be worth it all on it's own.
The problem is that the masses seem unlikely to enjoy the bulk and complexity that comes with such an infinitely modular phone, and they definitely won't enjoy the higher cost. I think people sort of have this idea in their heads that manufacturers can easily make something just as cheap and usable while lasting forever and they just don't for profit reasons. But I see very little evidence that's actually the case and applying some critical thinking and engineering experience suggests Apple is probably not just holding out on us having the infinitely upgradeable iPhone of our dreams. Again I'm sure they could make one, but they realize the market is small especially at the likely price point and given other tradeoffs they'd have to make.
I think I can't really accept that framing on a number of levels, but first and foremost, because it's a very lazy and easy accusation to make. One famous criticism of George W. Bush, as he was increasingly discredited in his second term was that "some things are true, even if George Bush says them."

I personally think The Trial of Henry Kissinger by Christopher Hitchens is a must-read, and I would also say that what Uncle Sam really wants by Noam Chomsky was truly eye-opening to me in recasting the history of American foreign policy, but that co-exists with a reality apparently uncomfortable to critics that having the moral upper hand and aligning ourselves with the project of global democracy post-World War II absolutely was an intentional part of Roosevelt's post-World War II strategy. Sometimes these criticisms of labor issues, of human rights issues, of democracy issues, etc are going to speak for themselves not because they conveniently coincide with a preferred state department narrative, but because they do map onto legitimate moral issues.

So I don't think it's enough to just say that the State Department would agree with criticisms as though that's sufficient to dismiss them. I understand there are corners in the internet where that passes muster, but to me it feels like it skips too many necessary steps in critical thinking.
Are any enterprises using OCaml other than Jane Street? I’m sure there are, but I haven’t heard of any.
Eh, not the privacy regulations. The stuff like the UK's whatever act that basically requires forums to have a lawyer on retainer.

Or strict time limits on removing content that put a lower limit on staff.
I share the experience of all 4 parents of this comment. It turned out I had undiagnosed ADHD. After diagnosis all my life suddenly made sense. Before the diagnosis, my situation had progressed to a point I’d get burnout by just everyday life, let alone work. Everything was overwhelming. Treatment turned my life around.

Later, I found out I have autism too - many autistic people “mask” around other people, altering their behavior to hide autistic traits. This is another thing causing (temporary) burnout after being around people.
Funny because I regard his show as “story time” and not something I would treat as journalism.

In contrast Tucker Carlson’s former show on Fox was a part of their “opinion” lineup and I don’t think regular viewers knew not to trust it as journalism.

When Carlson and Fox won the defamation lawsuit in 2020 it was because “Mr. Carlson’s statements were not statements of fact and that she failed
adequately to allege actual malice.”

The “not statements of fact” included the reassurances that Carlson always made, in this case he said “Remember the facts of the case. These are undisputed” followed by clearly disputed and false claims.

The lawyers argued successfully that it should be clear to the viewer that what Carlson says “cannot reasonably be interpreted as fact” even when he says that these are the facts.

Arguably the bigger factor was proving malice, and Carlson seems very careful not to put anything into an email or text that undermines what he says on air.

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-yor...
Kinda like paravirtualization? That sounds like a fun project!
This isn't actually timing the sorting, but just the (dumb) function f.
It would be telling, however, to quantify the reliability of those “years of reliable journalism” by fact checking a random sample of the stories told over those years. According to the article we are discussing, TAL started using professional fact checkers only after the discovery of the Daisey incident. We’re assuming that stories aired prior to that event are reliable, but we haven’t verified that belief, have we?
You'd need more than just letter widths because of kerning and ligatures, for 100% accuracy. Anyway, fontkit can work on the server and can get individual glyph metrics as well as metrics for a run of glyphs.

https://github.com/foliojs/fontkit
Edit: Removed. I made a stupid joke about a serious topic
> biden imported millions of third worlders with no vetting through a combination of lack of border enforcement and wide ranging refugee and amnesty efforts.

Everyone who told you those mistruths was lying to you hoping against you’d vote against your interests. Biden not only enforced immigration laws, he was doing so at a higher rate.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-dep...