skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Don't bother with Those People, They Have Different Values, They Aren't Like Us

I didn't say that you shouldn't bother with people. I said that discussing _policy_ is not useful if you don't agree on _values_. It's the wrong level of abstraction. To put it in a plain analogy: discussing the best route to get to your destination isn't useful if you don't agree on where you are going.

If you want to engage with someone with different values, then the values are where you need to start. If you want to engage with someone on the best way to get somewhere, you need to start by making sure you both agree on where you want to go.
>Huawei was the driving force behind true innovation in the Android ecosystem and one of its biggest contributors.

>Even today, my 2019 P30 Pro holds its own against the latest flagships—a testament to the kind of progress we lost.

What "innovation" are you talking about? Comparisons to other phones released alongside the P30 Pro doesn't show as it being better in any meaningful aspect. Camera performance is basically the same as an iPhone[1][2], and CPU performance is about the same as other flagship Androids[3].

[1] https://www.dxomark.com/huawei-p30-pro-camera-review/

[2] https://www.dxomark.com/updated-apple-iphone-11-pro-max-came...

[3] https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/compare_cpu-hisilicon_kirin_98...
They have been told many times and have stated that they accept that as a consequence.
The "race" ending reads like Universal Paperclips fan fiction :)
You don't say. This is my very shocked face.
Maybe that's how Trump believes tariffs work, but they are actually a tax on imports, that the importer pays. The importer passes that along to the American consumer.

Other countries are angry about this because it discourages importing from them, and their US exports may go down, or they may have to lower their US export prices. Not because they have to pay a fee or a tax to the US.
I love this! Is this open-source? I'd love to use for simulating the interface for Vogon Constructor Fleet ship interface :D
Again, if you look at the early papers on AI, you'll see things that are even farther from human intelligence than the LLMs of today. There is no "perversion" of the term, it has always been a vague hypey concept. And it was introduced in this way by academia, not business.
Gemini does I believe. On my list of todos is to add this to my fork of mcp-go.
I haven't announced I would post here therefore this post you are reading does not exist.
I think the confusion is because you're referring to a common understanding of what AI is but I think the definition of AI is different for different people.

Can you give your definition of AI? Also what is the "generally accepted baseline definition for what crosses the threshold of intelligent behavior"?
Oops, I missed that, thank you! Seems straightforward. I will give it a spin later. :)
How generative AI is transforming developer workflows at Amazon
Dijkstra's insights on the importance of simplicity and elegance in programming are timeless. His emphasis on the process of abstraction and the value of clear, concise code is as relevant today as it was in 1978. A thought-provoking read for any programmer striving to improve their craft.
Show HN: Redpanda 100M raise for "real-time enterprise agents""
You're not missing the performance. It's playing right now, and will play your entire life. You just don't get to see what comes next, how it changes, and how it ends.

Just like life.
Accused Tech Spy Says Deel's CEO Recruited Him with Offer to Be Like James Bond
What would be some concrete and objective markers of genuine intelligence in your eyes? Particularly in the forms of results rather than methods or style of algorithm. Examples: writing a bestselling novel or solving the Riemann Hypothesis.
Sounds like another print parentheses problem that will take 10 years to fix.
So let's say you make something in Europe, you pay VAT on the inputs, when it is sold to someone, they pay VAT, you take the VAT that the consumer paid and deduct the VAT you already paid to make the thing, sending the rest to the government, who only gets 20% on the thing, it doesn't get 20$ + 10% + 5% + .

You have to keep receipts of the VAT you paid to make the thing to do this, Europe doesn't like sloppy paper work, and rightfully so. Except...America doesn't have VAT, so there are no VAT rebates, they pay taxes on inputs and the consumer pays 20% on the finished item. But you are also right: if Norway exports a thing to the USA, they aren't getting a VAT rebate either from the sales tax paid on the thing in the states (or does Norway get a VAT rebate on things exported to non-VAT countries? I'm not sure).

But really, VAT is a better way, you avoid double taxation. The US should really just adopt it and make their VAT system compatible with Europe.
https://archive.is/DJpFG
You are doubling down on a muddled vague non-technical intuition about these terms.

Please tell us what that "baseline definition" is.
> If American consumers or the American government borrow to consume, what you say is right

Consumer borrowing is paid back, so it does not contribute to inflation. Government just issues more debt to pay off the debt, and that leads to collapse.

> US monetary policy for decades now that the deficit doesn't really matter

AKA kicking the can down the road. The bill will come due.
>Most people don't have political views, they have political tribes

Agree with this. Also, I do believe most people are appallingly stupid (I might not not be an exception either), cruel and easy to manipulate, and as a result are incapable of making rational decisions that benefit society as a whole. I try to never ever discuss politics with anyone, it's one of the most damaging and useless activities there is.

Usually, interactions with people on (arguably) political issues just leave me stupefied - no, I don't think people born in certain geographical locations are subhuman because of decisions of their current government; no, I don't hate nor wish death and suffering to anyone; no, I don't think the war is necessary and I don't want anyone to be blown to bits by a drone; no, I don't think artificial lines on a map ("countries") define who is wrong and who is right and worth throwing your only life away for; no, I don't think decisions of the government reflect the opinion of the entire population of that country; yes, I do think people I disagree with are real human beings with capabilities of sense, emotion, and thought just like I am; and the list goes on and on. Anyway, most people have a very different idea on the aforementioned examples.
I don't care about the replies, just wanted to offload this filth off my head somewhat.
I use CarGurus in the US to find used cars since you can very effectively filter on features and lifespan (age/mileage). Worth thinking about - used-car buyers might be after a specific year-range/model or only after a body type and set of features.
France Eyes US Big Tech in EU Retaliation to Trump's Tariffs
Completely agree. But if Markov chains are AI (and they always were categorized as such), then fancy Markov chains are still AI.
“WILL THERE BE SOME PAIN? YES, MAYBE (AND MAYBE NOT!),” Trump said in a social media post. “BUT WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, AND IT WILL ALL BE WORTH THE PRICE THAT MUST BE PAID.”

https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariffs-canada-mexico-china...

Or as Lord Farquaad put it: "Some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice I'm willing to make."
As soon as I saw "AI enhanced for Accuracy" I laughed and wondered if this was a belated April Fools joke.
Puerto Rico (yes not a state) has active coffee farms.
I would argue that in order to rationalize, you must first be rational

Rationalization is an exercise of (abuse of?) the underlying rational skill
one fundamental attribute of intelligence is the ability to demonstrate reasoning in new and otherwise unknown situations. There is no system that I am currently aware of that works on data it is not trained on.

Another is the fundamental inability to self update on outdated information. It is incapable of doing that, which means it lacks another marker, which is being able to respond to changes of context effectively. Ants can do this. LLMs can't.
Well, one argument not to use ZFS is simply the resources it takes. It eats up a lot of ram. Also I'm under the impression that one should never live-snapshot a database without risk of corruption.
A lot of supporters of the trade restrictions don't care. They're working people who don't own a lot of stocks and all they've seen is their jobs sent overseas.

To them, it doesn't even matter if things get "worse" for a while. Their life is already meeting every economic headwind imaginable.
The way web sites register for push is very different to the way Apple requires for APNS. They're using the same service to send the pushes but the client-side interface is totally different.
Did they also set IP_TTL to set the TTL value to match the platform being impersonated?

If not, then fingerprinting could still be done to some extent at the IP layer. If the TTL value in the IP layer is below 64, it is obvious this is either not running on modern Windows or is running on a modern Windows machine that has had its default TTL changed, since by default the TTL of packets on modern Windows starts at 128 while most other platforms start it at 64. Since the other platforms do not have issues communicating over the internet, so IP packets from modern Windows will always be seen by the remote end with TTLs at or above 64 (likely just above).

That said, it would be difficult to fingerprint at the IP layer, although it is not impossible.
Your premise is the goal of globalism though. You just draw larger lines. If your premise is the lines _must_ contain only the US as it is today then it’s impossible to have enough coffee for the entire country among other thing.
Yeah, they are the poshest tea shop in London, of course they're expensive. If you know of a more affordable place with shipping and high quality, I'm all ears.
There's a theory going around that the administration wants to crash the market so they can buy everything up for cheap, in a similar way to what happened in Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union.

At the same time though it seems like the current president has always been pro tariffs even though they are almost always bad for a economy, the reason why the admin is applying a lot more of them is because almost everyone left in the admin's circle is a yes men.
This is a regressive tax that hurts low skill and low wage workers proportionately more since basic necessities of life are going to increase in price - it will be a much larger share of wallet than rich. This will not materially change purchasing behavior of very rich (save maybe waiting to buy a car due to increased pricecs)

It would be beneficial to increase taxes on the massive service economy and use the proceeds to subsidize lower wage industries.

In trumps first term after tariffs affected farmers, they had to subisidize them to keep them afloat. It didn't quite work the way it was intended. The trade war relief program in the first term spent $30bn keeping farmers afloat.
I'm not saying it has to be perfect.

I'm saying that this outcome will never exist because more has changed than just the plant closing. If we coupled "reopen the plant" with "the plant makes entirely new things" and "the plant trains local workers to take these jobs" and "the plant pays above local service/construction wages" and "the plant will be successful in geopolitical competition" and "the plant can do 10x the amount of business due to advances in automation to get to the same level of employment" and on and on.

We could solve _each_ of these problems, absolutely - but they are all interlocking parts of a wicked problem. Blowing up the economy and threatening a global recession won't actually solve any of these.
GM announced they are going to hire some temporary workers and expand overtime for existing workers before the end of this month.

I'm sure there are more companies, but that is all I've seen so far.
>Elon has been using LLMs to fire government employees

Source?
To me CoT is nothing but lowering learning rate and increasing iterations in a typical ML model. It's basically to force the model to make a small step at a time and try more times to increase accuracy.
The context is whether this capability is required to qualify as AGI. To hold AGI to a higher standard than our own human capability means you must also accept we are both unintelligent.
Something tells me Apple is not remotely interested in systemd.

launchd, however works fine.
That's why I erase sshd_config and put what I really meant there. You may say "but isn't it better to patch it properly?". It is not. Yet another vps hoster –> yet another /etc/ssh directory template that may have all sorts of access issues in it. Better to replace it and make it do exactly what you have planned.
"minimum 10% tariff on all imported goods and materials" certainly sounds like a way to increase costs.

Increasing costs seems generally worse for an economy than decreasing costs.

I feel like most people could follow this logical chain of reasoning to a conclusion of "thus you have a elevated risk for an economic recession compared to the state of affairs before the tariffs."
It's even worse - the more we believe ourselves to be rational, the bigger blind spot we have for our own rationalizing behavior. The best way to increase rationality is to believe oneself to be rationalizing!

It's one of the reasons I don't trust bayesians who present posteriors and omit priors. The cargo cult rigor blinds them to their own rationalization in the highest degree.
just as others mentioned, the whole landing page and the docs page is really nice work. It was loading well and the final scroll to bottom :). Thanks for the library and the work put in.
> Do you think if children were going to be harmed in The USA then maybe the federal government should introduce a ban of that kind of shit federally?

I'm not sure the federal government can. There are powers reserved for states that the federal government can't circumvent. They have supremacy, but the jurisdiction of that supremacy is restricted.
> I reject this idea, someone voting for the "least worst candidate" does not wholly endorse everything they stand for

The thing about values is that they don't just capture the notion of what we thing is right or wrong, but also which things we value over other things. In an extreme case, two people can agree on 10 out of 10 different ideals or ethical stances and still have different values and support different parties because of how they rank those things.

In that case who you think is the "least worst" is also a reflection of values, as is declaring both sides to be the same, or opting out altogether. They all represent both what things you value and how much you value them.
It's government eating into your margins - unless there's no domestic substitutes.
YES. About ~30% of people appear willing to experience a loss as long as they believe they're inflicting a greater loss upon other people, and this personality type is baked in young. In my vier it's not a coincidence that polled support for Trump consistently hovers around 30%.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.1600451

Not all policy is rational. Oftentimes it's atavistic. Surely you have noticed by now that Trump deals in emotional arguments, not reasoned ones.
This is a warning.

Heed it
i mean, his views don't sound too odd. he sounds like a communist who's got a dim view of reform or socialism as a means to communism.
Banked Memories for Soft SIMT Processors
Does he need to say the word recession? How direct does he need to be?

https://time.com/7266187/trump-recession-tariffs-us-economy-...
> How does a government work under this theory?

It sometimes doesn't. Governments have failed many times throughout history.

But assuming a typical state of government affairs: Obligation. An obligation to oneself, to one's peers, and perhaps even to force. One is normally compelled to see government work – because they want it to, or, at very least, are afraid of the consequences if it doesn't.

None of that seems to apply in this case, though. So, again, if you remove the concept of being compelled, what is "obligation" trying to communicate?
Location: Florida
Remote: Preferred
Willing to relocate: Not immediately, but yes.
Technologies: JavaScript & Friends (React, Node, Vue, Vanilla, jQuery), templating engines such as Pug, Handlebars, MongoDB. I also am familiar with C#/.NET, TSQL, PHP, but not as strong as the others.
Résumé/CV: https://mattkfay.com
Email: faymatt96 (at) gmail

Hello, I'm Matt! I have been developing things for about 10 years, mostly as a hobbyist. I love building things that could be useful for others, such as the JavaScript Today publication, or Stoa Central (https://stoacentral.com). I am currently employed full-time as a frontend developer, but am exploring other opportunities, preferably remote. In my free time, I play chess, and train martial arts (Jiu-Jitsu/Muay Thai).

Looking forward to hearing from you!
> "healthcare should be for everyone" is a great claim to make. but then the question is implementation. how will you get rid of the current system and replace it with a more equitable one?

And as importantly, what does "more equitable" or "fairer" mean? More broadly, how do people define "better"?

In the US, a major issue is that The D and The R have radically different ideas of what those words mean, even though they agree on the high level objectives like "healthcare should be for everyone".
The domains do seem to be yours, since both services let you transfer the domain away:

https://support.wix.com/en/article/transferring-your-wix-dom...

https://support.squarespace.com/hc/en-us/articles/205812338-...

As far as I know, their SEO is fine, though they'll usually do worse in things like page speed than a site built from the ground up. I don't recall any sites my previous employers built with said services struggling to rank in Google.

As for whether they'd be recommended? Well to be honest, I'd say only for small companies and individuals who need the most basic of websites and don't fancy paying very much for it. For a client in that situation, you may as well just throw together a quick site on one of these services, change a few images and colours and call it a day. At least then they won't keep coming to you for web hosting help or updates.
Yeah I've tried the little track nub things but they don't work well for me, a good track pad is much quicker.
The primary use of cash is to buy goods and services. That's not the primary use of crypto. The primary use of crypto, as far as I can tell, is to try to make money appear out of thin air whether via speculation or fraud. And, admittedly, to occasionally buy JPGs.
> Leftist-anarchists want to keep power to an absolute minimum. Usually relying on a combination of culture and group action to wield just enough power to prevent the growth of unchecked power in the hands of a few.

Most anarchists, just like hard-line communists, seem totally opposed to the idea of private capital at all. To me this seems just as bad and unworkable as allowing unchecked use of capital accumulation for political gain.
These aren’t just some users, they’re safety researchers. I wish I had the chance to get this job, it sounds super cozy.
> There’s no specific reason why the reported Chain-of-Thought must accurately reflect the true reasoning process;

Isn't the whole reason for chain-of-thought that the tokens sort of are the reasoning process?

Yes, there is more internal state in the model's hidden layers while it predicts the next token - but that information is gone at the end of that prediction pass. The information that is kept "between one token and the next" is really only the tokens themselves, right? So in that sense, the OP would be wrong.

Of course we don't know what kind of information the model encodes in the specific token choices - I.e. the tokens might not mean to the model what we think they mean.
This entire house of cards is built on people believing that the computer is thinking so it's not going away anytime soon.
Dems just need to spin these tariffs as the largest tax increase in US history (which is basically correct).
I think there's going to be a major reallocation of corporate contributions over to the other party so they can fix this in less than two years via impeachment.
> What amazes me is the timing

If it didn't hit midterms it would hit the next presidential race. You gotta pick your poison. I guess they decided it's better to just get it over with.
In addition to what everyone else has said, if Europe goes through with the new "Big Tech tax" and/or tariffs on digital services, AWS would presumably take a big hit.
Thanks! English is not my first language, and I still have problem with this particular thing.

(IIRC use of "whom" was never covered in my English classes; I only learned about it from StarGate: SG-1, a show in which one of the main characters had a habit of mocking enemies by correcting their grammar.)
Since the GOP had its own dissenters on the budget, Democrats could have started by not voting for the budget without extracting concessions.

When Democrats were in power, the Republicans found all sorts of ways to gum up the works.
I believe OP intended to link to this page, which is a text article and a self-hosted (esa.int) video,

https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Videos/2025/04/Space_Debr... ("Space Debris: Is it a Crisis?")

The page is borked in a way that makes it tricky to find its canonical link.

They've separately mirrored their documentary on YT, which is here,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIsPbysinKw
You should mind that old saying about not being so open-minded that your brain falls out.

While the questions "what is art" and "what is beauty" are indeed interesting, this doesn't help in any way.

There's no substance, it wouldn't get a thousandth of this attention if it was made by a nobody and isn't even fit to be called a meme: it's something between outrage bait and an insipid conversation piece, a transparent (thus vulgar) case of "muddying the water to make it seem deep". But the whole intellectual "class" being so devoid of people upright enough to call out the naked emperor is much less benign than that: a clear symptom of decadence.
Humans sometimes draw a diagram to help them think about some problem they are trying to solve. The paper contains nothing that the brain didn't already know. However, it is often an effective technique.

Part of that is to keep the most salient details front and center, and part of it is that the brain isn't fully connected, which allows (in this case) the visual system to use its processing abilities to work on a problem from a different angle than keeping all the information in the conceptual domain.
Wouldn’t the TTL value of received packets depend on network conditions? Can you recover the client’s value from the server?
Adobe | Rendering Software Engineer in Test | On-site or remote, US or Western Europe

We’re a close-knit, remote-first team of engineers building next-generation, interactive rendering technology that powers a growing portfolio of high-profile creative tools, including the Substance suite of products.

We’re looking for a software engineer with a passion for computer graphics —real-time or offline— to lead and evolve our quality engineering efforts. This role combines strong software engineering skills with a deep focus on rendering quality and infrastructure. As part of the core rendering team, you’ll contribute C++ code, build tools and tests, and play a key role in ensuring the renderer stays fast, stable, and visually correct across diverse hardware.

Fee free to reach out if you have any questions, my email is in my profile.

https://careers.adobe.com/us/en/job/R154963/Rendering-Softwa...
> every economic headwind imaginable.

Freaking what? Are they food insecure? Facing a military onslaught. Come on.