skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah and when it does break down, the parts are going to cost more to fix it.

And what are they gonna do when their car breaks down catastrophically? Buy a used car? The prices of those will skyrocket once the price of new cars goes up.

Then really desperate people will steal cars as the value of them, and used parts start to skyrocket.

It doesn't even take half a brain cell to see how this works.
"Things are hard, so don't try"?

Seems like it's just advocating for cowardice hiding behind moral grandstanding.
Just a workaround, but someone made a helping pop-up:
https://github.com/ryxxn/pwa-install-prompt

Last time I checked, push messages did not work when the web app was not running, has that changed? Because I think that is the most interesting feature for users: To notify about important things while not using the app. It has also always been abused by app creators with useless stuff to drive engagement etc.
I think I never allowed a single webpage to send me notifications - if for example I want to know about the latest news about plant pottery, I will probably just visit that website again...no need to notify me.
> It's pretty clear they (and Google, to a lesser extent) don't want web apps to be on the same level as native apps.

Ironically the reality here is backwards: for a very long time iOS apps could _only_ send declarative push alerts. Only since iOS 10 were you able to use a UNNotificationServiceExtension to customize the content on-device. That extension has very strict resource and CPU limits and is terminated if it violates them. Even when you do have this extension you still need to send a declarative payload in case the on-client code fails, exactly the same as Declarative Web Push requires.

> And running _any_ amount of code "expends energy", so it seems silly to even imply that is a problem.

There's a big difference between running some native code and spinning up an entire JS virtual machine and worker environment to (effectively) modify some JSON. In fact, worker boot up speed is a recognized problem to the extent that there's an entire API to handle situations where a network response would load quicker than a Service Worker might:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/NavigationP...

Years ago I actually tried spinning up a JSContext in a notification extension out of curiosity and the extension was immediately killed for exceeding resource limits. May well not be the case today but the logic still makes sense to me.

Apple is no saint and has done plenty of negative things for web apps. But in this specific instance they're making the right call, IMO: requiring backup notification content for when client-side code fails is sensible.
Right! AI developers and directors should be culpable for infringement as part of their duties to larger organizations.
Even taking that for granted, we need to understand why America voted for a Kremlin agent, and largely continues to support this behavior. (If you reran the 2024 election today, I don't think the results would be radically different.)

Surely, the Kremlin plays some role there, with their troll farms. But it has been going in this direction even before the Internet, and the trolls are really just nudging things along in the direction they were already going.

That is something that historians will one day probe very deeply... assuming that there are any.
So it has nothing to do with reciprocality but it's simply 10% or the trade deficit, whichever is larger?
Trump may be a bad leader but he'd still be just one type of bad leader. I'm not trying to fully relativize Trump either, they're not all equally bad.

I agree with Slavoj Zizek's take on Trump's appeal and why a lot of criticism of him seems to either have no effect or increases his fan appeal: As a general rule, people relate to others by identifying with their weaknesses, not only or not even primarily with their strengths. You aren't susceptible to his appeal because you're of a different class or background which has different sets of strengths/weaknesses which make it hard for you to relate to Trump.

The weaknesses Trump has - his stubborn ignorance, his impulsiveness, his might-makes-right mentality and disdain for rules, his vindictiveness - are deeply shared with his fans. They will forgive his sins because it is their sins too. For example when Trump is attacked for an impulsive comment, they relate to the risk that they could also be cancelled for some comment that is seen as racist or sexist or something. His policy framework is made of the kind of simple ideas you'll find in a pub, I once heard Trump described as "the average guy from Queens" and it made a lot of sense to me. "Nobody knew healthcare was so complicated", "We're going to build a wall".

I belong more to a white collar, professional class. I probably have a blindspot on the weaknesses and sins more endemic to my group, ones that I share with the figures I find appealing. If I had to guess I'd say it's something like an ideological/theoretical zeal, bureaucratic dysfunction, and an exclusionary judginess. When a politician unveils some theoretically elegant project and it largely fails and runs over budget and gets mired in bureaucratic hell, I'm maybe too quick to forgive that as it's a relatable sin.
> Francois Chollet, a former intelligence researcher at Google also shares this view.

Great, now there are two of you.
No compromise with fascism!
> The crucial question is what is "politics"? Are personalities politics? No. Are parties? No. Are inflammatory issues about race, sex or gender or political correctness or immigration? No!

I don't personally agree with how quick you are able to write those things off as not being political. Would you mind providing a bit more explanation of how you are able to arrive at such confident No's?

Perhaps you consider political to be an intrinsic quality of a thing rather than a descriptor of how a thing is used/intended? I fall into the latter camp, and thus am very open to consider almost anything and everything political. Much like art.
The big difference, as always with web apps, is intent and consent.

Installing an app is a strong signal that the user actually wants/needs it. The level of consent is much higher right out of the gate. With web apps on the other hand, the user can be swept away by a redirect, accidental tap, maliciously captured tap (think a transparent element covering the whole page), etc. There’s a much higher chance that users never intended to end up where they’re at and don’t actually want anything from the app.

Following this train of thought, it stands to reason to have a looser policy with apps. If there’s a way to install web apps with the same level of consent (PWA listings in an App Store for example), standards could be loosened when users come through that route, but for navigating to any random web address things should be more tight.
Sweeping tariffs threaten 'Factory Asia'
contempt for users is the unavoidable consequence of having users.
https://archive.ph/Qy6PW
Apple's approach of only allowing sites that you've pulled out onto your home screen to request them is actually not bad for balancing this. It means I'm not being constantly nagged while browsing normally, but when I decide I want to treat something "like an app" it gets access to richer features.

(I very rarely do this. I think the only thing I have pulled out like that currently is Puzzmo, which doesn't even do notifications.)
Side concern: how impactful must the tarrifs be to make a noticable dent in global trend, and a noticable dent on climate change ?

(I mean, it would not be noticed by the USA anymore, since they're not into that whole "science" stuff, but I heard that Europeans have learned how to make a couple satellites on the side.)
So art is all about the identity of the author?
I’m sure this was driven by the government as opposed to TSMC volunteering to take this on. Some behind the scenes action made this happen.
I mean, I watched and participated in the US Election last year, it was extremely clear to me that Republicans focused on economy, and Democrats focused on social issues.

The Republicans won, which is an indictment on the Democrats messaging in my opinion.

I'm not even talking about the merits of which party has better ideas, or if people are voting against their own best interests. But I think the party that said they'd do "something" to make the economy better is the one that won.

Why Democrats don't hammer on retraining and education so that more people can participate in the services and information economy confuses me greatly. Manufacturing isn't coming back, at least not immediately.
Yes, the boring solution is often the best.
https://archive.md/i47bV
Yes, but all that internal state only survives until the end of the computation chain that predicts the next token - it doesn't survive across the entire sequence as it would in a recurrent network.

There is literally no difference between a model predicting the tokens "<thought> I think the second choice looks best </thought>" and a user putting those tokens into the prompt: The input for the next round would be exactly the same.

So the tokens kind of act like a bottleneck (or more precisely the sampling of exactly one next token at the end of each prediction round does). During prediction of one token, the model can go crazy with hidden state, but not across several tokens. That forces the model to do "long form" reasoning through the tokens and not through hidden state.
https://archive.md/F5gw0
Please...don't.
Vertical space is chronically in short supply.
Yes, Thunderbird search become unusable when they removed the option to run search on server. But apparently the "quick filter" works in a different way so if you can live with one folder only you can use it.
It is nonsense to take whatever an LLM writes in its CoT too seriously. I try to classify some messy data, writing "if X edge case appears, then do Y instead of Z". The model in its CoT took notice of X, wrote it should do Y and... it would not do it in the actual output.

The only way to make actual use of LLMs imo is to treat them as what they are, a model that generates text based on some statistical regularities, without any kind of actual understanding or concepts behind that. If that is understood well, one can know how to setup things in order to optimise for desired output (or "alignment"). The way "alignment research" presents models as if they are actually thinking or have intentions of their own (hence the choice of the word "alignment" for this) makes no sense.
https://archive.md/2RgLl
Well. It’s literally the only game on epic I’ve paid for. And I’ll be giving their competition equal dollars. So game theory wise it’s a wash. They haven’t earned me as a repeat customer and I do what I can to avoid them.
Oracle Tells Clients of Second Recent Hack, Log-In Data Stolen
This thing is really cool, I want to pipe data between systems... can I trust you to have that kind of access?
Friendship is more of an ideal.

https://www.wilde-online.info/the-devoted-friend.html
It says they still do. And I’m glad about that.
Are you implying there is a very small chance that if someone posted in 2018 reddit "We should tariff Algeria at 35% because X", the LLM that the administration may have used would have agreed with random redditor?
https://archive.md/nzakV
That's why I’ve stopped feeding the troll — I just downvote or flag when necessary. It’s a shame because, years ago, he was one of the better commenters on HN.
The two sides dont actually have different values, they have small wedge issues that unscrupulous individuals/groups over-exaggerate for their own gain. Im center left but still see myself in Trump supporters, were basically the same people who basically want to live our lives
> "If p then q" does not imply "If q then p."

My original comment is challenging whether "p then q" is valid in the first place by asking if the inverse would be true as a thought experiment. (Neither is true IMO)

Just because someone has certain values doesn't mean they vote a certain way.

Just because they vote a certain way doesn't mean they have certain values.

"p" (who you voted for) and "q" (your values) are largely independent for a large percentage of voters.
To me that just sounds like someone who arrives at his political views by thinking rather than blindly adopting whatever his peers believe. It's only odd because it's (sadly) rare these days.
I think the assumption that political parties represent two completely distinct sets of values is overly simplistic. In reality, there's a significant amount of overlap between them—what often differs is the style of messaging and the framing of ideas.

Personally, I find it hard to fully identify with either the left or the right. I share beliefs and values from both sides, depending on the issue. This makes it difficult to adopt a clear-cut political label, and I think that's true for many people.

Politics today often feels more like a battle of narratives than a clash of core principles / values.

p.s. my perspective is non-US one.
They likely would make you file Form HS--748128 to even ask if they do - I wouldn't want to up against a Vogon about the heuristics of clearance
https://archive.md/clGxI
If that's your best refutation then I must have hit close to home.
A great compact design. Hopefully the new X13 is going to be a worthy successor.
There is no way the money gained is worth doing that for a company

Paying to hear your own interview feedback would be a ridiculous system
Phylogeny of all the plants I can remember eating
This comment is such a confusion of ideas its comical.
> This is why inflation was such a huge issue. I fail to see how this is any different.

This time it's vaguely patriotic to pay more, I guess.
Unlike your math example, if serious harm or death is at stake, I don't mind if it leads to conflict and bad times. Avoidance because "it might be a bad time", to me, feels like a lack of appreciation for what is at stake in these conversations.
Thats os/2, not amiga os
There's "taxation", and then there is "taxation". VAT is an incredibly aggressive and overreaching version of "taxation", and it has severe implications on free trade with Europe. I'm not sure why you won't acknowledge this.

And by the way - plenty of economists view taxation as impediment to free trade.
DNSSEC would also not work in the conference wifi scenario.
Show HN: ODocs – Make AI coding assistants generate compatible code on first try
The "Kit" nomenclature dates back to the NeXTSTEP days.
> Access to gender affirming care for trans minors is banned in more than half of US states. The very same medicines are allowed to be given to cis minors.

The Cass report conclusions and recommendations should be listened to, it was a way better and more thorough study than the Netherlands study that begat all of the "gender clinics" in the US and elsewhere. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20250310143...

> In 13 US states bathroom bills prevent trans people from comfortably existing outside of their homes for more than a few hours at a time.

As far as bathrooms, i feel uncomfortable in public restrooms. I don't know what the rate of people that feel uncomfortable in public restrooms, but those of us that do find family or single occupant restrooms, and know what places have those. No one wants to piss in a literal trough, i could be wrong.

I don't consider sodomy a basic human right, but i could be argued with, i guess.

I don't see what "bomb threats" have to do with human rights, in this context. Is there a human right to have products available at Target? If everyone boycotted Target (like they did with Bud Light), is that a violation of human rights, too?

I am unsure why people keep deleting their replies. It is possible to have a reasoned discussion about inflammatory topics.
IMO the only thing that can get through is actual personal consequences for the voter themself

Well, yes. And his approval rating has been steadily declining in tandem with the stock market declines he's caused. If/when prices suddenly skyrocket because of tariffs, you can bet his approval ratings will decline further.
That's what I came here to ask too. This looks wonderful, but I'm already using Motion quite a bit. I'm also using React and am unsure how well Anime.js pairs with that while Motion has a first party react library.

In any case, like everyone else here, I'm very impressed with OP's site and documentation. Very slick!
>Because whats inside our minds is more than mathematics,

uh oh, this sounds like magical thinking.

What exactly in our mind is "more" than mathematics exactly.

>or we would be able to explain human behavior with the purity of mathematics

Right, because we understood quantum physics right out of the gate and haven't required a century of desperate study to eek more knowledge from the subject.

Unfortunately it sounds like you are saying "Anything I don't understand is magic", instead of the more rational "I don't understand it, but it seems to be built on repeatable physical systems that are complicated but eventually deciperable"
That's a really interesting metaphor. I worked with Dan years ago.

It seems like the talk was at CraftCon 15 and called "Beyond Features: rethinking agile software delivery with Dan North".

I couldn't find it, but I found a similar talk he gave at a meetup that discussed surgery:
https://youtu.be/EoJFWdhv8q0?feature=shared&t=1564
or
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz5HBtDl-1A
> It also has a separate country abbreviation (RE). You know, like you'd see on an address. The thing that tells you where something, like a good imported in to the United States, is coming from.

Yes, obviously, it's ISO 3166-1 but that's a batshit way of assigning tariffs. To the point I suspect it's a LLM.

Norfolk Island? The island with 3000 people, which in the context of international trade is a speck at the side of Australia. Or the uninhabited Heard Island and McDonald Islands with zero trade?

If Reunion and Norfolk Island are to be considered separately from their mainlands, where are the tariffs for Easter Island (Chile)? It has more people than Norfolk and probably more trade, it's 3700ish km from the administrative region it belongs, so it geographically distinct like Reunion.

Anyone (with a pulse) tasked with calculating the tariffs would see this and think "I have to remove these outliers". So the two options are:

A. Someone took the ISO 3166-1 codes and brainlessly calculated their batshit formula without noticing that HM doesn't produce anything. They did not instead do the more natural thing, go from highest imports to lowest which would've eliminated HM and most anomalies. They didn't even check their work.

B. They asked an LLM, which calculated this in the most naive way possible one-shot.

I dunno governor, this looks like vibecoded Excel spreadsheets.
In South Korea, ActiveX is still required for many things like banking and government stuff. So they're stuck with both IE and the gaping security hole in it that is ActiveX.
As a highly skilled and comparatively highly paid worker, I feel it is outrageous to suggest that I am within the class that needs to give up any reputed "wealth" when I am nowhere near the 1% who hold more than 50% of it. Such a claim just contributes to the wealth making of the 1% misers even more. Class warfare! I have already had to give up significant amounts of college and retirement savings from these tariffs.
Assuming you can identify it's someone else's IP. Clearly these are hugely contrived examples, but what about text or code that you might not be as familiar with?
If the billionaires pack up and move to another country, then those who are willing to pay their due taxes and operate with a lesser profit margin would take the place they left in the market. There is no need to oblige sociopathic profiteers because they threaten to leave.

And, where will they go, really? There are considerable taxes in every country that billionaires would consider. And if they choose to cram into some small island tax haven in the Caribbean, the US can easily pressure that tax haven to do anything it wants.
Hahahaha. Wait. Are you serious? Elon has been promising all kinds of things AI that are "just around the corner" for at least a decade now. It's always in the next year or two. There is no chance they cracked autonomous robots with those puppet bots they were showing off not long ago.
Could you elaborate why this is good for Intel?

I understand it brings a short term injection of expertise and capital, but it looks to me like they can't operate their own fabs and a chunk of their manufacturing facilities have just been gobbled up by their competitor.
These threads show off one thing: that the world is full of bullshit jobs, and companies selling bullshit products.

If you work in AEC, youll see how far away we are from "fully replacing" anything.

Are we really going to start erected skyscrapers and bridges, wait for them to collapse, then wait for the gov to slap AI on the wrist?

Get a job in building engineering, mech eng and come back to me. Theres a lot of ML and assistance, but humans are still thinking and collaborating.
For Adams, yes.

But for the Department of Justice, no. They were trying to get the case dismissed solely in order to be able to threaten the mayor of New York. They (rightly) believe he's guilty, but (wrongly) believed that asking the judge to dismiss it would let them hold it over him forever.

Instead, the judge sidestepped that: he dismissed it "with prejudice". So Adams gets to walk free, but the administration doesn't get to use that as a threat. There was a serious "plague on both your houses" vibe from the judge.
> db engineers approve the generated migration script

yeah - this is definitely the intended flow here. We won't be recommending anyone blindly applying generated migrations.

As you mention, it is expected that you generate & review on your local development machine, check into source control, push & merge. We've also been using this internally for ~2 years now and it works great
Kidnapped off the streets? I think for “bodies burned in pits” I might prefer “slaughtered” or “butchered”. Disappeared sounds rather light for what we’re currently discussing to my ear.
Ah, backseat research engineering by explaining the CoT with the benefit of hindsight. Very meta.
Proof of work still takes time. It will slow each individual requester down.

Meaning for the same request rate they would need more hosts, which costs them more money.
Moral laws and natural law, and moral people in a candid world. It's the same principle by which one people accuses another, over which they have no jurisdiction, of crimes against humanity or war crimes or of violating Nature's Laws. See the US Declaration of Independence for a short treatise on this topic.
Chollet's argument was that it's not "true" generalization, which would be at the level of human cognition. He sets the bar so high that it becomes a No True Scotsman fallacy. The deep neural networks are practically generalizing well enough to solve many tasks better than humans.
> EEA, despite decades of EU efforts, is not a single market.

Huh? It really is. There's free trade and free movement of labour. How is it not a single market?
Same, I bought Intel $INTL, and in the same order I scooped up some Amazon in $AZN, but to diversify and not have all of my eggs in one semiconductor basket, I also threw down some dough for a good chunk of AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) in $ADVM. Facebook ($FBK) is another good buy I think, going all in. I like stocks!