skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Doesn't that feel a bit disingenuous? It sounds like you might be coming from a very privileged background and haven't been placed in a similar situation that is primarily outside of your control. It also seems to suggest that I haven't spent my years as a parent trying to do the best for my children (i.e., raising my income).

Besides all that, it seems like you simply disagree with the fact that this is a problem at all. If that's the case, we can agree to disagree.
It's great to see a retired Tomcat driver interviewed for this article. For those unaware, the F-14 was featured in Top Gun and is an absolutely iconic aircraft that's no longer flying [in the US military].

That pilot's quote sets the stage in a way that confers an almost timeless quality.
I have it.

Chewing is the worst. Any mouth noises. Throat clearing. Tounge clicking. And on.

Mother had it. Sister has it. Father told off my mother for being so hard on us for our "noises" telling her she was going to give us "a complex". I guess she did. Behavioral + genetic most likely.

It sucks. I'm too hard on my own kids, even after having clear-headed/rational conversations about it. It's not rational. Pure emotion boiling over.

I secretly wish to be deaf. I use headphones all the time. For decades. Too loud.
LibreOffice comes with six icon themes. Do you mean every single one of them is childish or only a particular one?
I would imagine that some people in the military, in spite of all the evidence to the contrary, have an idea that it is the enemies of the country that are trying to kill them not their leaders
Front page of nasa.gov
I'm not sure I follow. Your complaint is that Framework only sells direct and not through retailers?
> Both archaea and bacteria, in the three-domain model referenced in the article, are prokaryotes.

I suppose it depends on which model you use, and as discussed they seem to vary and be in flux right now, but the three domain model I learned was prokaryotes, archaea, and eukaryotes - the first two being different domains.

> Yes, "with eukarya containing all multicellular organisms" does not mean "all eukarya are multicellular organisms" it means "multicellular organisms are a subset of eukarya".

We agree. I don't grasp your point?
Is it known how much of the decompiled code comes from the game's developers, versus some sort of SDK for the original platform?
The right answer is, in my experience, something that starts soft and intermittent, and then gradually ramps up in loudness and annoyance. In bed, it's enough to have a harpsichord gently playing, but if I'm watching TV or out at a restaurant I might need it to eventually escalate to a klaxon to get my attention.

My first experience with this was Groovy Blue: https://youtu.be/WCbyp_UuyoM?si=s0ZpfcXZKw7dP17i
I know dozens of US academics who have moved out of US or are planning to, because of Trump and conservative's war on information.

I'm just one person. It's anecdotal but speaks volumes that I'd know that many.
>I wish I could get import OpenOffices icons into LibreOffice.

I haven't tried it, but I think it's quite possible: https://documentation.libreoffice.org/assets/Uploads/Documen...
Aside from the solutions other people have mentioned, if you have often-used symbols, you can set up a text replacement in keyboard settings. For instance, I have :x: for the multiplication sign.
Is it worse or better than quoting a Twitter comment and taking that as it were authoritative?
Strange. I haven't seen that notice with those links before.
Sun: Down – A Dark Side to Power Grids
"Our findings show an ecosystem that is insecure — with dangerous energy and national security implications. While each residential solar system produces limited power, their combined output reaches dozens of gigawatts — making their collective impact on cybersecurity and grid reliability too significant to ignore."
Not quite. If I understand correctly from your links, the person selling the property then pays to continue living there. In the system I described, the person buying the property pays the seller an ongoing fee, and the seller continues to live there.
I think they mean "widely available for public usage"
Awk Idioms Explained
Full disclosure was a thing exactly because of that.
System 7 was better for me due to AppleTalk file sharing. System 6 was confined to LocalTalk or printer sharing.
See How Every Pin on an XIAO RP2040 Can Be a Capacitive Touch Sensor
I mean by "competitive economic prosperity" the ability of a national economy to endure multiple successive economical challenges of modernity as well as other nations.

Such challenges include the changes in labor costs, evolution of supply chains, emergence of new types of value etc.

I hypothesize that adapting to such challenges is misaligned with a populist value system.
How terrible it would be for someone (or some company) to waste the time of 6 people (or 600 people) in an unnecessary and ultimately useless interview process.
> This is moot

That’s not a positive at all, the complete opposite. It’s not about laziness but being able to somewhat accurately estimate and balance risk/benefit ratio.

The fact that making a wrong decision would have significant costs for you and other people should have a significant influence on decision making.
It is developed by Signal Messenger LLC which is a for-profit company.

That company is then owned by a non-profit but technically you could argue it's commercial.
Show HN: Make the browser tabs more intuitive and convenient
Thanks. How big a factor is it that you aren't circling Earth's axis as quickly as most other places, and thus launches lose some boost? That's what I was wondering originally.
Huh, awesome idea and rabbit framing.

I’m doing a similar thing with a custom android for instagram automatization.
Basically we provide agency service but it’s AI instead of people.
We analyze reels with AI (text + image recognition), that's how we deside if it's the right content to comment on.
We analyze top performing comments and replay or/and comment considering this with a CTA at the end.
Strategy shows a pretty significant result
Good luck with your rabbits as well :)
I think that's a fair assessment on trust as a term, and incorporating via personal judgement. If this was any public story, I'd also factor in breathless reporting about new tech.

Black-box decisions I absolutely have a problem with. But an extra resource considered by people with an understanding of risks is fine by me. Like I've said in other comments, I understand what it is and isn't good at, and have a great time using ChatGPT for feedback or planning or extrapolating or brainstorming. I automatically filter out the "Good point! This is a fantastic idea..." response it inevitably starts with...
Surely you already know the history of professional engineers, then? How it's only a little over 118 years old? Mostly originating from the fact that it was charlatans claiming to be engineers, building things that ended up killing people, that inspired the need for a professional license?

"The people who made modern life possible" were not professional engineers, often barely amateurs. Artistocrat polymaths who delved into cutting edge philosophy. Blacksmith craftsmen developing new engines by trial and error. A new englander who failed to study law at Yale, landed in the American South, and developed a modification of an Indian device for separating seed from cotton plants.

In the literal historical sense, "engineering" was just the building of cannons in the 14th century. Since thousands of years before, up until now, there has always been a combination of the practice of building things with some kind of "science" (which itself didn't exist until a few hundred years ago) to try to estimate the result of an expensive, dangerous project.

But these are not the people who made modern life people. Lots, and lots, and lots of people made modern life possible. Not just builders and mathematicians. Receptionists. Interns. Factory workers. Farmers. Bankers. Sailors. Welders. Soldiers. So many professions, and people, whose backs and spirits were bent or broken, to give us the world we have today. Engineers don't deserve any more credit than anyone else - especially considering how much was built before their professions were even established. Science is a process, and math is a tool, that is very useful, and even critical. But without the rest it's just numbers on paper.
Okay, frankly, the fuck are you on about?

I specifically mentioned both minorities and women in my original post, you're the one who specified men vs women. At this point, it seems you're the one who has some political if not potentially misogynist agenda.
Yeah, the vast majority of what I spend my time on in a day isn’t something an LLM can help with.

My wife and I both work on and with LLMs and they seem to be, like… 5-10% productivity boosters on a good day. I’m not sure they’re even that good averaged over a year. And they don’t seem to be getting a lot better in ways that change that. Also, they’re that good if you’re good at using them and I can tell you most people really, really are not.

I remember when it was possible to be “good at Google”. It was probably a similar productivity boost. I was good at Google. Most (like, over 95% of) people were not, and didn’t seem to be able to get there, and… also remained entirely employable despite that.
You listed software that range between $500-$15k. Last time a “I want the option to pay for my software” posts here I replied to was about Infuse. And people complained that “$80 is an absurd amount for a software” and “Why isn’t there a free version?”

A software that costs $500-15k is only feasible for a B2B type business.
> These days developers have to invest significant time and effort into making sure the software just runs on the constantly updated operating systems and platforms — which costs money on an ongoing basis.

What’s different today?
Correct; Wikipedia is still not authoritative.
Yes, but our methods of understanding either brain or particle collisions is still outside in. We figure out the functional mapping between input and output. We don't know these systems inside out. E.g. in particle collisions (scattering amplitude calculations), are the particle actually performing the Feynman diagrams summmation?

PS: I mentioned in another comment that AI can pretend to be strategically jailbroken to achieve its objectives. One way to counter this is to have N copies of the same model running and take Majority voting of the output.
Three Intel board members to retire in chip industry-focused reshuffle
I used to have this. I don't anymore, and weirdly I kind of like chewing sounds now. It actually triggers ASMR for me. Not all sounds, like definitely not slurping, but other clicking/crunching sounds trigger ASMR for me.

It's strange. Because I do remember being extremely grossed out by the sound of my father eating cereal at breakfast in the morning before school. I wouldn't be able to eat my own food it disgusted me so much.
I was hoping the paper was on _learning_ theory.
Turn your Plex library into cable TV
Whether to speak or not is often different than whether to be honest or not. I don't tell people that I find their hairdo to be awful.

In the case of the OP, arguably it's assumed that if it would impact your employer, you will tell them. Not telling them is therefore dishonest - it's strongly implying there is no problem. (For the OP, it depends heavily on the employer and their relationship.)

> It's also cost me a /lot/.

Is there an option that doesn't cost you a lot?
Well there are still millions that can. There is a handful of competitive LLMs and their output given the same inputs are near identical in relative terms (compared to humans).
Weird how the term “jailbreak” has evolved/broadened. I went here thinking this was about OS or DRM cracking.

It’s about cracking LLMs.
You could try https://github.com/balisujohn/localwriter
No wonder they beat my school, they have a whole class on the Putnam exam. Well, I'm still proud I got one question right once.
>can we stop pretending with the generic name for ChatGPT?

What? I use several LLM's, including ChatGPT, every day. It's not like they have it all cornered..
Boiling down to a couple cases would be more useful if you actually tried to disprove those cases or explain why they're not good enough.

> It's strange you don't see the inherent irony in your post. Instead of your wife just directly uploading the dataset and a prompt, she first has to prompt it to write code. There are clear limitations and it looks like LLMs are stuck at some sort of wall.

What's ironic about that? That's such a tiny imperfection. If that's anything near the biggest flaw then things look amazing. (Not that I think it is, but I'm not here to talk about my opinion, I'm here to talk about your irony claim.)
> Docusign is trash-theatre. Its secure because they say so.

Docusign's system is designed very specifically around the legal requirements of the US federal E-Sign Act, which guarantee, for transactions in interstate or foreign commerce, that even if there is a statute, regulation, etc., on its face requiring a written agreement, the electronic signature will be treated as satisfactory.

It did not become popular because it was viewed as particularly secure, it became popular because it was point-by-point checklist following the E-Sign requirements, and there are lots of entities who wanted to legal guarantees that come with complying with E-Sign.

> Remember in Scotland, verbal contracts are binding with no need to witness. Bizarre!

For most matters (there are some matters that legally--either by common law or statute--require a written contract) verbal contracts are binding without a need to witness in most common law jurisdictions (including the US); written and signed contracts are important even then because they provide evidence of both the content and the fact of the agreement, even when they are not required for a binding agreement to exist. Proving the existence and terms of an unwritten, unwitnessed contract when you want to take action over a breach by your counterparty can be tricky.
How does ai help you prep for a client meeting? Telling you how to structure a meeting? Giving you topics? For someone who has done 100+ meetings I'm not sure I see the advantages unless you are using ai to replace google then you run the risk of learning fake information.

There are mock interviews and mock meeting services that would really help you prepare.

What you are suggesting is using ai to learn to drive when you should be getting in the car.
It is a BS characterization - it wasn't something I said, but your imagination - and of course a characterization that served as something you could dismiss, which you did. Even the name of your fabricated characterization included the word "fallacy" - that doesn't leave much room to take the other person's idea seriously. It is much easier arguing with your personal strawperson than to understand a real person.

I didn't assume anything about you; I just made my point.
I’m not sure that’s true. Last Office I bought was “Home Edition 2016” and it’s been running on a machine that doesn’t have internet access since 2017 without any issues.
Well, with every conspiracy theories thriving on this day and age with access to technology and information at one fingertips. If you add that now the US administration effectively spewing bullshit every few minutes.

The best example of this was an arguement I had a little while ago where I was talking about self driving and I was mentioning that I have a hard time trusting any system relying only on cameras, to which I was being told that I didn't understand how machine learning works and obviously they were correct and I was wrong and every car would be self driving within 5 years. All of these things could easily be verified independently.

Suffice to say that I am not sure that the "bullshit-radar" is that adaptive...

Mind you, this is not limited to the particular issue at hand but I think those situations needs to be highlighted, because we get fooled easily by authoritative delivery...
Well humans are not a monolithic hive mind that all behave exactly the same as an “average” lawyer, doctor etc. that provides very obvious and very significant advantages.

> days to go from a cold start with zero dev experience

How is that relevant?
> I'm guessing it's not just any software devs, is web developers specifically that use Kagi.

I do both, and I have MDN pinned. The thing is, if I search for C#, Python, Java, I get great results on any search engine. If I search for web stuff, I get tons of crap and mediocrity. MDN is almost always what I want instead of some other stuff.

Regarding "days numbered", I agree with the gist of the other replies ;)
I’m reminded of how I always think current cutting edge good examples of CG in movies looks so real and then, consistently, when I watch it again in 10 years it always looks distractingly shitty.
I feel like both standpoints are true. Yes the tech is miraculous, and yes it has a very long way to go.
The narrative of this article is that Big Tech can and should be doing more, that they're the enablers.

But if you look carefully:

> The roots of “pig butchering” scams reach back to the offshore gambling industry that emerged from China in the early 2000s. Online casinos had become hugely popular in China, but the government cracked down, forcing the operators to relocate to Cambodia, the Philippines, Laos, and Myanmar.

China didn't wait for whatever tech was enabling them to start policing. They cracked down themselves, and clearly this is not happening in the lawless borderlands of Myanmar. That's the main enabler here, and the problem to solve. Big tech implementing proposed measures would at best be a stopgap measure that the scammers would find ways around.
These are not similar. Wikipedia says the same thing to everybody, and when what it says is wrong, anybody can correct it, and they do. Consequently it's always been fairly reliable.
I have two Apple TV 4Ks and both started dropping Bluetooth connections every minute or so after a recent upgrade.

My headphones will cut out and when I go to pause the video I’ll be clicking frantically because the remote isn’t working either. Or I’ll be in the menu and the remote will pin to the left or right and scroll to the end of some massive YouTube list.

Reboots, resets, nothing fixes it.

My Apple Watch regularly has a glitched Home Screen too.

I defended Apple’s quality recently, right before everything started breaking for me.
Estimating Camera Motion from a Single Motion-Blurred Image
site can't even open :(. white space.
The home page doesn't seem to load on my mobile? Just a blank page.

Also an open source DocuSign alternative that we use is DocuSeal. Not affiliated, just a fan.

https://www.docuseal.com/
Make your own:

https://www.thespicehouse.com/products/cheese-powder-white-c...
Just a bit north of you, in Seattle, it feels like every house in my neighborhood with enough land added an adu, a dadu, and condoized. My realtor says almost everyone looking for single family homes wants an existing dadu or somewhere they can build a dadu.

I don’t know that anyone has claimed allowing ADUs is all you need to do to solve our housing crisis. But in a lot of places it’s the only thing the NIMBYs will let you get away with. So if you can’t middle housing, at least allowing ADUs gets you something more.

If the demand to live in your city dramatically outstrips the any possible number of ADUs that can be built, then it won’t help on its own, the cup still runs over.
https://help.kagi.com/kagi/privacy/privacy-pass.html
Enswampification.

I’d write a witty blog article about it if I had one.
I don't really get the meaning. Would love an explanation.
I can't believe I had to dig this deep to find this comment.

I have yet to see an AI-generated image that was "really cool".

AI images and videos strike me as the coffee pods of the digital world -- we're just absolutely littering the internet with garbage. And as a bonus, it's also environmentally devastating to the real world!

I live nearby a landfill, and go there often to get rid of yard waste, construction materials, etc. The sheer volume of perfectly serviceable stuff people are throwing out in my relatively small city (<200k) is infuriating and depressing. I think if more people visited their local landfills, they might get a better sense for just how much stuff humans consume and dispose. I hope people are noticing just how much more full of trash the internet has become in the last few years. It seems like it, but then I read this thread full of people that are still hyped about it all and I wonder.

This isn't even to mention the generated text... it's all just so inane and I just don't get it. I've tried a few times to ask for relatively simple code and the results have been laughable.
Counterpoint: I'm at a small business and I'm primary for 24x7 oncall. I don't even take shifts with my coworker. But, this is because I'm empowered to make out of hours (overnight, weekend, holiday) calls STOP. I get woken up by something about once or twice a quarter.

When something wakes me up, the next day I start a process to ensure I don't get that same alert again: bugfixes, adjusting thresholds or time-to-critical, detecting problems and auto-remediation, determining it can be a "business hours" response.

This also requires buy-in from development. Literally yesterday I had an education opportunity with one of the developers about a ticket slated to go into production that evening that would have immediately eliminated one of our leading monitoring indicators, because it would have started creating hundreds or thousands of Sentry issues an hour. "I was thinking it was more like logging, where more information is better, where with monitoring we want the fewest messages possible."

Always, always, look at every pager hit and ask "what can prevent that from happening again?"
Yep, but that's totally unacceptable because you have to tediously select every entry, one at a time, and peer at the status bar.

It also doesn't allow you to sort results by location, as you could if it were a column.
>I saw someone saying 80% of doctors believe that LLM's are trustworthy consultation partners.

See, now that is something I don't know why I should trust: a random person on the internet citing a statistics that they saw someone else say.
>I have a hard time wrapping my head around this statement ... Then why is it suddenly different when it comes to government.

Indeed. I think the media and Democrats are slowly figuring out that screaming about layoffs of federal employees as incipient fascism, tyranny, authoritarianism, etc. just doesn't outrage non-government workers who are quite familiar with the concept of you and everyone else in your office/department/division/company abruptly losing your job.
> I hear a lot of good things about kagi but privacy isn't one. They need to record every search and connect it to your account.

Looking at their privacy policy they state the following:

> We may store web requests made by user browser temporarily, with strict retention periods, for debugging purposes, and in a manner that they are not linked to an account.

https://kagi.com/privacy#server-data
> I hear a lot of good things about kagi but privacy isn't one.

I don’t use it, but the Privacy Pass [0] thing should actually make it great for privacy if you care more about that than personalization.

[0]: https://blog.kagi.com/kagi-privacy-pass