skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The only problem with correctly using the Em or En dash is that people will automatically assume the text was written by an LLM -_-
I'd rather use Linux and game with an imperfect translation layer, than put up with Windows.

Proton is a lesser implementation of Windows API, sure, but Windows itself is a lesser implementation of an operating system for power users.
I would expect that PS/2 to USB could be handled on the computer.

I have little experience, but from debugging some early 3D printers on Linux, I've learned that the U in USB really stands for universal: that it'll just pass on serial stuff to/from the OS, drivers or software on the computer to handle.
I'm generally not a fan of the incremental rustification of the Python ecosystem, but I started using uv a few weeks ago just for this particular case and have been liking it. And to the point where I'm considering to migrate my full projects as well from their current conda+poetry flow. Just a couple days ago I also modified a script I've been using for a few years to patch pylsp so it can now see uv script envs using the "uv sync --dry-run --script <path>" hack.
are you product manager？
However, what about a risk that someone in Ukraine is adding a little bit of malware in it?
Keybindings are the least interesting part of emacs. I modify the default keybindings heavily, because I find them uncomfortable.

Emacs's strength is being a portable programming platform which once you learned it allows you to very quickly create mini applications which help with everyday tasks.

Programming a VS Code extension is pretty cumbersome compared to creating a quick Emacs extension.
This technology is still only few years old.
It would mean that if they are operating at a loss and hoping to capture more of the market later. But if they're profitable then the main danger is a competitor coming along.

Growth mindset is a big part of our sick society, unfortunately. It's the only thing our politicians like to talk about, after all. Being a stable business delivering value is as good as dead.
Yeah, I've stopped using them because of this reason.
Apple Needs a Reset
They might have used some middleware, but GBA had no SDK I believe.
Generally I am pretty happy with macOS and I still believe it to be the best option for a desktop. Where I'm getting frustrated is the increase locked down nature of the OS. I get that it's for security, and that's fine for my dad, but it's starting to get in the way of me down my work.

So when you already start feeling like the operation system is preventing you from doing the things you need to do, then all the small cosmetic flaws seems more in your face.
I find it incredibly developer hostile as an OS now. I don’t want to have to type a password in to use a debugger. I want to be able to download software and run it as I want, whoever wrote it, without them having to sign it. All that does is push people away from supporting Macs, particularly if they’re learning and don’t want to shell out £99 for a developer license. And you can see that because the Mac ecosystem has become dramatically less varied and stagnant.
Oh wow, what a blast from the past. Around the year 2000 or 2001 I got an optical mouse as a present (either birthday or new year, can't remember). I really wanted it for a long time because playing StarCraft with a mechanical one was rather painful.

Needless to say it was a USB mouse and I only had ps/2. I purchased an adapter but it never worked despite spending a lot of time trying and testing it with different PCs and mice.

Then I took the adapter to an electronics repair shop. They opened it up and explained to me it was fake: it just connected the wires without any circuitry for the real USB support. They had no idea why anyone would manufacturer such a thing.

Well, now I know why. I spent quite a long time thinking I was sold a counterfeit adapter.
Not google docs, because they can contain confidential information.
AMD List of Recommended Textbooks
BYD is not a very experienced company. According to [0], they produced 455,073 vehicles in 2019 and 4,304,073 in 2024. This growth rate is quite unheard of in the automotive industry and I would expect serious quality compromises to achieve that.

[0] https://tridenstechnology.com/byd-sales-statistics/
Someone still has to write the prompts though, someone who knows what he is doing.
we have simplified the interface to just one home button and the screen interface, as well as the volume up/volume down key.

To select, just press on the item.

To hover, press and hold for at least 2 seconds.

To get a list of options, press and hold for at least 2.5 seconds, but not more than 3.5 seconds.

To delete, press and hold for 3.6 seconds, but not longer than 3.9 seconds.

To save, press and hold for 4.1 seconds. Pressing and holding for exactly 4.0 seconds activates the archive action. Pressing and holding for 4.2 or more seconds sends the item to the blocked list.

To retrieve the list of items in the blocked list, press and hold and simultaneously press the volume up and volume down key.

To delete all items in the block list, press and hold and simultaneously press the volume up key only.

To completely reset your device, press and hold and simultaneously press the volume down key only, whilst holding the device in a completely vertical plane, and rotating clock-wise and counter-clockwise, smoothly, at precise 2.35619 radians every 30 seconds.

To trigger the emergency call feature, drop the device at an acceleration of no less than 9.6m/s and no more than 9.7m/s

/s (kind of)
Thanks for the question! I'm the maintainer of CocoIndex :) Please feel free to ask me anything!
Ironically Linux Desktop environments have never been so robust.

As much as I dislike systemd, if this is the reason, then I retract everything negative I ever said.
And so we're getting to the burning books part.
The tooling you are paying for doesn't work with the full abilities of the context so you need to do something else. Doesn't matter what it's supposed to do or that other people say it does everything for them well, it works a lot better with as much in context as possible on my experience. They do have other tools like RAG though in cursor, and it's much quicker iteration, ultimately a mix of what works best is what you should use, but not just block stuff out out of disappointment with one type of tool.
Why is this getting downvoted? ChatGPT is completely obsessed with em dashes. I don't even know how to make it on my keyboard.
No, the most mathematically effective thing would killing most humans immediately.

Blaming the rich is a scapegoat excuse that encourages most people to continue consuming beyond sustainability.

We need massive behavioral change that starts with everyday people, not the rich. Only then will the rich be held accountable.

Unfortunately, most people don't want to think about reducing their meat intake or not bagging their produce in plastic because that's too much work. This enables the rich and corporations to continue destroying the planet because we constantly have excuses.
Dear god, they firing a laser again.. activate the water pumps.. its all steam outside.. the dread.. the horror.. now we dive, and its all surface steam.
Oh, the fish-manity.

They burned away one layer of glycol shield plating. Horrific.

Oh, they use x-ray lasers- but the platform that comes up to fire, is hardened, automated, a shooter, that returns to the depths.
Interesting. I didn't even know pinterest is a legitimate site. I just assumed it is som SEO scam from looking at the website for a few seconds.
probably not very relevant in a zoom meeting but there are people hypersensitive to the eye movements of someone reading from a teleprompter as well! When I figure someone is reading from a script with their eyes moving, it really affects my focus for some reason. Here is someone trying to find the ideal setup to prevent it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LkRMtWfhn4
The more people proliferate this, the worse it'll be—frankly, we should be embarrassed that societal literacy and writing style knowledge is so poor that we jump to the "must be written by an LLM" conclusion whenever we see any sort of exotic character usage!
Show HN: Timered-counter – An animated value change web component
A game launch countdown page I built months ago became obsolete when the timer ended, but developers love modularizing reusable code - hence timered-counter.
I've yet to find a decent implementation of search-as-you-type anywhere, not just Spotlight. I have that same issue on Firefox, and with Windows Search, for example.

And it makes no sense whatsoever. If "foo" matches "foobar", so should "foob". I honestly don't know how the hell can they still f up such a simple piece of technology in 2025.
Although your article is clearly oriented towards ApiSix publicity, it would be nice if you could actually speak about the leading purpose-built LLM gateways in the market, such as NeuralTrust.ai and Portkey.ai for the sake of objectivity.
No they don't.

https://imgur.com/a/EOmBJ0i

This is a group known for spewing dioxin over civilian populations, bombing weddings and hospitals, &c in large parts of the world. They inflict enormous violence at a huge distance, and unlike infantry they aren't forced to see the consequences of their actions up close.

Huge amounts of resources have been spent to make these people and what they do seem cool rather than cowardly and atrocious.
They neither have the financial and time capacity left required for high quality, nor do they have the engineers and management to enable it anymore.

„Just get it out somehow.“

„Fixing bugs is not a KPI for our promotions and salary increases.“

Old stuff is practically abandoned. No one knows how to fix it anymore and it’s replaced instead, at best. Disdain for legacy. The only thing management gets excited about is the next shiny thing, currently tacking AI onto everything.

Can you name big companies where this did not happen?
In keeping with F-14 discussion, this submission just disappeared off the main page faster than the U.S.S. Nimitz going back in time to December 6th, 1941.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Final_Countdown_(film)

I like to think this development will inadvertently alter the course of history such a way that it manages to make HN less censored.
That doesn't seem to be an array at all, if the idea is to check whether a number is within a range. Seems like an interesting data type though, a combination of a range data type and a map/associative array.
Why do people block ny times and Washington Post newspaper?

Is it because it is paywall or for political reasons?
Wikipedia is fairly reliable if our standard isn't a platonic ideal of truth but real-world comparators. Reminds me of Kant's famous line. "From the crooked timber of humankind, nothing entirely straight can be made".

See the Wikipedia page on the subject :)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia
To expand, permafrost melting emits CO2 equivalent that is 100s of years of modern human activity. It’ll obviously happen in less than 100 years.
Some people trust Alex Jones, while the vast majority realize that he just fabricates untruths constantly. Far fewer people realize that LLMs do the same.

People know that computers are deterministic, but most don't realize that determinism and accuracy are orthogonal. Most non-IT people give computers authoritative deference they do not deserve. This has been a huge issue with things like Shot Spotter, facial recognition, etc.
I feel like we'll laugh at posts like this in 5 years. It's not inaccurate in any way, it just misses the wood for the trees. Any new technology is always worse in some ways. Smart phones still have much worse battery life and are harder to type on than Blackberries. But imagine not understanding why people are bullish about Smartphones.

It's 100x easier to see how LLM's change everything. It takes very little vision to see what an advancement they are. I don't understand how you can NOT be bullish about LLM's (whether you happen to like them or not is a different question).
Open Activity Monitor, go to the Energy tab and look for any apps that are marked as preventing sleep.
Subscription is fine on Office for me. I just pay for the O365 family edition (without copilot) and everyone gets it for about £6.70 a month. However I don't want the signed in cloud version so I just use the moral justification of cracking it with Ohook and disabling all the cloud shit. I'm paying for it so I don't give a crap.

LibreOffice I want to like but I've tripped over many weird bugs and things which have been floating around in their Bugzilla since the dawn of time.

If I have an academic interest, I'll just use TeXlive and LaTeX Workship inside VScode.
One reason to grow upward is also just the need for oxygen. Mushrooms do this too - they tend to colonise and begin to fruit in high CO2 concentrations, but eventually want to escape it. And you can see the negative side effects of not being able to do this in mushrooms too (if the CO2 is too intense they grow too fast relative to their thickness [trying to reach air] and become nasty and stringy looking)
There is no air conditioning and electricity if we don't stop destroying the environment.

Unfortunately, your stance seems to be the most common because it relinquishes you from the guilt of destroying what isnt yours so you can enjoy cheap stuff.
and it still works. And problem seems to be related to the unconditional trust of LLM output.
Show HN: AI Automation App that connects to your API and back-end
i did not know about quartz but compiz was not the only 3d compositor iirc xcompmgr which became compton was older
It automatically downloads interpreters from some internet source. It's a security nightmare. It can be configured not to do that but it's not the default.
I haven't presented for a while, but one thing I do is try to anticipate the questions people may have.

Then if I'm really prepared I'll have extra slides (if showing slides) that delves into the answers for those questions.

If you find people ask the "what should I be asking" question, you can make it a little humourous by having a slide prepared with that exact wording and delving into something you'd like to talk about.
Ettus Research Suggested Reading: Digital Wireless Communications, DSP, SDR, RF
Isn't that the issue with basically any medium?

If you read a non-fiction book on any topic, you can probably assume that half of the information in it is just extrapolated from the authors experience.

Even scientific articles are full of inaccurate statements, the only thing you can somewhat trust are the narrow questions answered by the data, which is usually a small effect that may or may not be reproducible...
I tried using Numbers across my Mac and iPad. It has some show stopping sync bugs there which result in it completely destroying documents. Then when you try and recover previous versions you get a lesson in Apple's commitment to things other than the facade on the front of their stuff: not a lot. The document versions thing sometimes doesn't even work and if it does it's so slow it's unusable. Probably backed with some low tier S3 stuff. Also the formula editor is painful at best.

TeXshop on the Mac is however rather nice.
And that's just what we know about. There are still sources that we're discovering. Our sources don't match what we measure yet, which means it's likely worse than we know.
Chess is 11Mb, you must be desperate for space if you want to remove that.
Like a list of lists of strings
They apparently do sell it in my country with a price of a good used car. Nope.
I don't subscribe to this narrow view of economics. The AI fallacy is that whatever they do cheaply just stops being valuable. We pay a little for it, but we spend most of what we have on other things. What that is shifts over time. Pre-industrial revolution it was food and agriculture. Then it shifted to manufacturing. Today it's people doing stuff for other people (aka. services). Over time, we work less and less and we earn more and more.

You mention UBI. You could actually argue that we already have some notion of that. It's just a terribly inefficient, poorly administered, and very costly, and not very good version of it. People don't starve, they mostly have access to health care (the US being an exception to this relative to most countries, including most developing nations). And shelter too (people freezing to death because they can't hide from the elements is pretty rare). Many people live on what they get for free. It's called charity, social security, unemployment, pension, childhood, etc. But one way or another, somebody provides for them. And being dependent on just the free stuff is something that would horrify most normal people. But it's there for pretty much everyone.

Feudalism is cyclic. It comes and goes. We had a lot of it early last century. And then we got communism, socialism, unions, etc. And a surge in economic wealth for the middle class after things were rebalanced. The post WW II economic boom in the US was powered by Roosevelt's new deal. I don't think there's much respect or loyalty to the current batch of trillionaires. They can exist only because people allow them to. Future governments could find themselves empowered and tasked to do something about the economic wealth distribution. Such things have happened before. Often after some kind of revolution.
i'll bet 99% it's amazon grift. nothing good comes out of the current regime. Even if you say it started under biden.
cool. an interactive version of the knights and knaves book by ray Smullyan would be cool, as well. nice work.
Thank you very much, Excalidraw is the best PWA implementation I have seen so far.
We either pay now to have this civilization last longer or we pay later in terms of the unsustainable systems not being sustained any more.
that business? Trumps failed casinos and Hollywood self-dealing accounting.
You basically just said we're still polluting enough to destroy the livable environment while championing a small efficiency gain.

Wild thing to be enthusiastic about. Very short sighted.
I can’t remember the last time I or anyone else I know typed a CSV file out. It’s almost universally the lowest common denominator interchange format.
I'm still waiting for them to remove Launchpad (which seems like a half assed step towards unifying desktop and tablet systems), and I've yet to meet anyone that uses their weird new desktop management system, the thing with the windows on the left side. That just reminds me of the GUI experiments they did in the 2000s, with 3d environments and whatever Ubuntu (or gnome/kde/whichever) tried to do.

I'm hoping they're gathering usage analytics and will overhaul unused features.

Caveat, I'm probably not their average user, I do almost everything via Spotlight. I don't even use the bottom menu thing, it automatically hides and I only use it when I accidentally hid a window.
I wasn't aware this existed, thanks! Very interesting.
> I am looking forward to extending my sequence of adapters in the future.

Keep us updated about how long it gets. :D
I think it still doesn't count until you burn a DVD that works on real hardware each time after an attempted compilation :)
> why should tesla be valued more than the other car companies ?

Honest answer? It's a meme stock. There is excess capital in the economy. Some buy watches and cars. Some give to their church. Some buy Bitcoin or Tesla.

There is, of course, intrinsic value to the company. It consists of a car company, an energy company and options on a robotics and a self-driving car company. The car company is worth some tens of billions of dollars. Given the competition and fact that BYD is giving it away for free, the self-driving piece seems more like future table stakes for the car company than a revenue driver it once could have been. The energy business is solid, but suffers from the same weaknesses (strong competitors, lack of differentiation and international prospects trashed by Musk) as the car company--possibly another tens of billions of value.

So I guess if you need a rational explanation for the valuation, it's tremendous option value being placed on Tesla's prospects (a) as a robotics business and (b) to shed the shadow cast over it by Musk's politics.
You're implying that buggy software has no impact on the bottom line. I'm not so sure. Users weigh the availability of features against the quality of features. Getting bugs fixed is not necessarly the highest priority for users either. It's a trade-off.

Our use of Microsoft 365 is a pretty good example of that. I moved our company to Microsoft 365 because it had some features we wanted. Then I moved the company off Microsoft 365 because it turned out to be too buggy to be useful.

I realise that the actual users of software are not necessarily the same people making the purchasing decisions. But if productivity suffers and support costs rise then the consequences of choosing low quality software eventually filters through to purchasing decisions.
Every(?) western nation is going through a cost of living crisis.

And some people believe increasing the cost of energy is a solution to anything.
I strongly believe technical interviews should try to mirror a pair programming session on a problem as if it was work, rather than a quiz or interrogation type format.

If someone asked during such a session (where it's cameras, screenshare) that they wanted to do something like google some documentation, I wouldn't see that as a problem. Obviously it's a problem if someone just googles for a solution and pastes it in.

I see LLMs in the same way. No issue with them using it do something like take the pseudo code they wrote in front of me and turned it into an implementation. Especially if they could talk through this code and make suggestions about further changes and so on, clearly showing they understand what's going on.

The real concern is going to be when sophisticated agents can impersonate (clone voice and video) in a convincing way, as well as the capabilities to see the screen and type away as if it was a real person, and they're responding to you in real time.

If the software is based on the models made by large companies, they'll be happy to give you recipes. They would refuse if the coding request mentioned something about cracking passwords or dumping credit cards. And all of them will have a meltdown if you try to ask them to say something politically incorrect (what a bizarre world that would be if that became the new captcha system for humans trying to figure out if they're wasting their time with a fake human).

That said, this is going to be a cat and mouse game. There will be nothing to stop people from fine tuning models to get around being "jailbreaked" to reveal themselves as LLMs. Perhaps the best means is taking the time to research problems that causes "vibe coding" to completely fall down. And that is likely going to be things that are novel and haven't been littered all over the internet. That has a knock on effect of making such interviews a bit more interesting for the people doing them too.
> Currently, there's a much greater understanding that LLM's are unreliable.

Wikipedia being world-editable and thus unreliable has been beaten into everyone's minds for decades.

LLMs just popped into existence a few years ago, backed by much hype and marketing about "intelligence". No, normal people you find on the street do not in fact understand that they are unreliable. Watch some less computer literate people interact with ChatGPT - it's terrifying. They trust every word!
Ask GPT-4o to explain it to you.