skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
We'll have to see. Tools like these are already common on platforms like LinkedIn, so if it's legally questionable I expect the courts to cover it soon enough.

My German isn't good enough to read the original text about this case, but if the sentiment behind https://natlawreview.com/article/data-mining-ai-systems-trai... is correct, I wouldn't be surprised if this would also fall under some kind of legal exception.

The biggest problem, of course, is that regardless of legality, this software will probably be used (and probably already is being used) because it's almost impossible to prove or disprove its use as a remote party.
Gaming computers usually run Windows and games. AI computers often run Linux and AI software. The differences require different configurations of both hardware and software.

So, they make products preloaded with configurations for each market segment. The customers pay for all the headaches this saves them of custom setups.
Learning about Rama (https://redplanetlabs.com/) which has been released recently. The tech is very cool and also it's Clojure, but still not sure what would be the best use case for it.
What high performers know about doing hard things
Reliabily yes. Comprehensively .. may have been an issue.
I have multiple people in my life that followed this mindset as well, to offer some more anecdata.

I never got a rationale when asked, which still perplexes me considering these people weren’t fans of the republicans in this past race.
I often say that the login is the front door to your application.

You may want it to look pretty, but what you really want is for folks to get through it as quickly as possible so they can get to the good stuff: the features of your application.

Tracking failure rates over time helps you make sure your front door is working.

(You also want to make sure only the right folks get through.)
I'm trying to make an edison battery (Nickel Iron). My first attempt failed due to expired silver epoxy... I'm now planning to try a nickel paint (meant for electron microscopy).

https://www.nutsvolts.com/magazine/article/february2012_Noon
I saw this demoed on this video where the guy builds the fastest DOS computer possible

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LIPTQjQAPE
Show HN: 2x2 Generator (With Sound Effects)
The Swedish city fined for missing an environmental target
As a teacher I would be okay with that - I tried my best and did what I could.
Electronic devices are also better for you than no mental stimulation at all.
Their last console probably inspired them to not try again for a while.
> That sounds like a lot of work.

Again, it is a lot of work if you have to do it at once. If you've done it naturally over the course of your life, you would never have had a big pile of things to take care of at once.

> Alternatively, I can just ignore them all. I don’t care if there’s a red circle with a number in it. I don’t notice it and it doesn’t bother me.

Suit yourself. Personally, I care about responding promptly to certain things, like instant messages or emails, but I don't appreciate unwelcome distractions.

See: https://vxtwitter.com/AutisticCallum_/status/190533113360614... & https://vxtwitter.com/AutisticCallum_/status/190533113707064...
Coincidently, downloading anything from wi-fi or cellular network is exactly the same thing. Just on steroids.
It's a terrible time for US consulting IMO. Unless you're a VAR or somehow attached/aligned with a software vendor, you're fighting for dollars that companies don't have at the moment. Folks are fighting for headcount and keeping only their trusted/embedded consultants, no one seems interested in trying something new, especially with all of the "let me LLM that for you" consultancies that have sprung up. No one with money seems to care about getting better results by switching to a different integrator, they just want to keep their jobs and not rock the boat.
It's not. Demoscene productions are released on the demoscene.
> Every two moon cycles, the team gathers and delete all tickets older than two seasons.

Amazing. One of my clients Jira has tickets assigned to me from 2016. Those projects are long, long, long done.
Vision Large Language Models (VLLMs)
Yet they can be referenced as the official position of the government.
I don’t think this is how it works. By the same logic, since cars were invented a hundred years ago (give or take), by today we should have flying cars at the speed of light, and yet we don’t.

AI development will plateau. It’s not like it *must* improve with each iteration.
Do you disagree with the facts in the case, or with the idea of prosecuting politicians for any crimes at all?
the new mRNA genetic vaccine industry promotional media outlet "raises alarm" appears to be the statement.
I think the "offer a PR I will accept is the kicker here, getting it 'done' is the easy part"
perihelions [1] phrased it best - a galaxy spinning clockwise is just the mirror image of one spinning counter-clockwise. So why should mirroring change brightness? I don't really understand why Doppler beaming would cause this (though one of the papers did also mention it).

The other question is - what does the rotation of our own galaxy have to do with it? Let's keep the Solar system as is, and mirror the rest of the Milky Way around it, so that it is now spinning the opposite direction. Why should this affect the apparent brightness of other galaxies? Especially since the Solar system is effectively moving in a straight line, on the scale of a human lifetime.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43535285
You're correct. But I think that it is still difficult to make an argument that is original enough to make a professor happy.
The perpetual 5 year problem of web development. I wish there was a way to do forward standards
Oracle Cloud says it's not true someone broke into its login servers, stole data
From the ass of Secret Dreams, comes Imaginary Friends.
What company if you don't mind? Sounds like work I've been interested in. Thanks!
Thank you! Reading this, it seems to be unclear/unspecified in the text exactly who or what group was involved in this or whether there was affiliation to the Chinese state. That's the part I'm really interested in though.
I loved that!

Thanks for posting it.
This is also a nice comparison table about the different LLM routers in case anyone is interested: https://www.reddit.com/r/LLMBusiness/s/bHGbmM7QEf
The Establishment want cheap labour and ”diversity" helps keep the lower classes divided against each other.

Immigration also creates demand for the asset owning classes (housing).
Huge miss in my opinion. If it doesn’t support all scenarios I’m not sure what the Chrome team is thinking here
Just place magnetic strips coil inside outer ring and wings connected through inner ridge with tinient ball bearings that allows inner wing fan to move and copper coils inside fan design and they will start deflecting spinning and it will lift up
If you don't mind me asking how do you go about this?

I hear people commonly mention doing this but I can't imagine people are manually adding every page of the docs for libraries or frameworks they're using since unfortunately most are not in one single tidy page easy to copy paste.
I tried the exact prompt and model from the blog post, but my outputs were way off—anyone else see this? This is the best of 3 output of flight simulator prompt (gemini 2.5 pro (experimental)):

https://imgur.com/0uwRbMp
What is most apparent to me (putting in existing code and asking for changes) is Gemini 2.5 Pro's tendency to refuse to actually type out subroutines and routinely replace them with either stubs or comments that say, "put the subroutines back here". It makes it so even if Gemini results are good they're still broken and require lots of manual work/thinking to get the subroutines back into the code and hooked up properly.

With a 1 million token context you'd think they'd let the LLM actually use it but all the tricks to save token count just make it... not useful.
If people ran with "If you don't understand, don't sign" in general, every major tech firm on the planet would collapse.

More generally, the world is extremely complex. None of us understand all of it, but the constitution of the EU needs to engage with a surprisingly large percentage of it. There's no way such a document can ever be easy to read.
I've been looking to migrate from Exchange-Outlook, but there really aren't any options. There just isn't an open source solution to have an integrated email / tasks / events / contacts, with consistent labels across item types and reminders.

With Outlook, i can use a custom view to see every item in a category flagged for follow-up. I can also set a reminder on a contact, or drag an email or contact onto my calendar to create an event.
Could an equivalent of the Coriolis Force be at play here?
Reactionary politics aren't known for their well-thought-out and considered policy ideas. You're applying logic to what is largely an emotional topic for people, no matter how many times they say shit like "facts don't care about your feelings," their policies are almost in whole, feelings, and the subject of immigration is a great example.

They're furious about illegal immigrants taking jobs from Americans, and they just flatly are not. The jobs don't pay enough for Americans to want them. This is demonstrated every time there's a crackdown on it and farmers in the south west have fields full of rotting crops that won't get harvested because the Americans who could do that job just... won't.

They're also furious about illegal immigrants getting access to government services while not paying taxes, which is, in the vast majority of cases, a double-falsehood. Not only do illegal immigrants regularly pay taxes (the IRS has specific sections of the forms specifically for non-citizens) but they are in fact completely unable to access virtually any government services, including those that one can make a solid case they deserve, like access to worker's rights protections/organizations, and the ability to go to the police when they're victims of crimes, which they are disproportionately to the rest of the population, again, because criminals know they can't go to the cops.

> And conversely, I wonder what will happen if and when we finally do get useful humanoid robots.

I mean, even the cheapest number Elon's thrown out for his AI-powered humanoid robot (which I can't stress enough, does not exist in any meaningful way relative to what he is selling it but nevertheless) puts it at costing years of what an immigrant does to perform the work, and that's not even going into the fact that having them out in fields vs. climate controlled warehouses is likely going to increase the amount of maintenance needed, if they could manage it at all without just falling directly over. And there are energy concerns too, you'd almost need a mobile charging station for agricultural applications of them.

To be honest if you were setting out to automate the picking of crops that thus far have not been mechanized, you'd probably be better off building a large machine that can move over several rows at a time and have a dozen arms underneath it that do the actual picking, versus a bunch of humanoid bots. The human form is exceptional don't get me wrong, but translating it to machinery has been one of the greatest fixations of our species since robotics of any sort came into being, and we still haven't really managed it. It must be pretty fucking hard to pull off.
This is a common misunderstanding. Speaking against the current violent regime in Israel is anti-zionism and not anti-semitism.
The parent post has a mistake - it should use an "int" type instead of "signed char", otherwise the implicit promotion done by a+b breaks the desired showcase.

That fixed, it wouldn't be an infinite loop if taking the "x+1" to do what the hardware would do, i.e. twos complement; "x < x+1" would become false for x==INT_MAX; and yet clang considers it UB, and thus the loop is UB once it hits the wraparound point, and that can result in unintentional computer melting: https://godbolt.org/z/833KzYY5G

Of course you still generally need to have whatever harmful code you don't want ran here to still be present in the binary somewhere, and "melt_computer();" is a rather weird thing to have, but a "perform_heavy_work();" or "tolerate_high_temps_for_a_bit();" or "void debug_override_temperature_readings(){...}" are more realistic. (of course you might need special permissions to do those, but, uh, it's possible to get said permissions, especially if the point of the software is to operate those things.. and there are plenty of harmful things one can do without special perms)

(edit: actually, even without that char↔int fix, the parent post still shows UB because infinite loops are UB in C (as long as the condition isn't a compile-time constant) (also the x++ is UB on reaching the char limit); copy-pasting it directly into harmless_loop still results in computer melting)
He has a whole load of short stories on his website, and a whole series about a mermaid too
It's important to note that Cunk, whilst highly informative in many domains, is essentially winging it when it comes to Shakespeare.
Maybe for the other two, but stealing EU Parliament funds on a party-wide scale isn't exactly what I'd call 'democracy'
> Our threat model is that all software developers make mistakes, and sometimes those mistakes lead to vulnerabilities

That’s not a threat model. What are the attackers going to do if there are vulnerabilities in your executable? Is it connected to a web server?

Does it have access to privileged resources?
I'm sorry it seems you're just not aware of how laws work.

Ukraine has different laws than the US. Under Ukrainian law, drafts are legal in their current situation. Under American law, deporting people without due process is not legal in our current situation. In fact, even if the US were at war where an invocation of the Alien Enemies Act made sense, even then people are owed individualized due process before deportation to ascertain whether they are in fact an Alien Enemy.

Of course you can reference information shared by the White House, but there's a difference between referencing it and asserting that it has legal authority that it doesn't have under our legal system.

In our legal system, the White House's memos cannot overrule people's Constitutional protections, even if they're attempting to solve an actual problem. The "out of thin air"edness of the EO is irrelevant to its legal authority.
Don’t like? I am talking about people that are in fact responsible for the death of thousands of people, you realize that is the result of the choices right?
I'd probably do either the aws or azure architecture exams. I use both fairly often but have a bit of a gap on the infrastructure side. Alternatively I might do some actual building in serverless technologies rather than just drawing pictures, I'm at a large company so often developers are picking up the detailed tasks.

If I wanted to do something completely new I might dive into more detail around security/pen testing although I've noticed that a lot of companies doing this just seem to run a lot of off the shelf tools these days.
This is true, and I try not to get eager about new browser improvements for this reason. But look at the porgress over time in browser abilities, it's astounding.

The days are long but the years are short.
The official position of one branch of our tripartite government.
I don't think you're going to see 10 years of linear progress increasing the complexity of generated code, the same as you're not going to see a steady march towards factually correct LLM answers. We've had a step improvement towards producing certain types of text output, and people are racing to throw more resources at it for diminishing returns.

Producing code has got to be the best case scenario for LLMs because there's a lot of boilerplate and examples of simple applications, and people aren't out here criticizing the structure of a TODO list app.
You'll probably still keep a <div>-based control in your page, and selectively hide the <select> based one or this one, or generate different HTML for different browsers if you can do that.
This does not look like a Gtk4 port of Solvespace, but like another independent CAD application that uses Gtk4 for its GUI on GNU/Linux.
Nobody is stopping anyone from taking notes during class. Even you should appreciate the slides because they’d give you an opportunity to review before big exams and make sure you didn’t miss anything.
I don't think it is infinite - each universe can only have that mass/energy that fell into the outer black hole in the parent universe. At some level you'll inevitably have black holes with universes that do not have enough mass to form another inner black hole.
It'll take a long time for them to rebuild their reputation on that front. I threw away a pile of perfectly serviceable NVIDIA desktop boards a while back because they were "supported", but they couldn't do stuff like run modern compositors or even XScreenSaver.

These were high-end boards that worked fine in Linux when I bought them (as long as you were willing to periodically patch + recompile the kernel from a text console).

Anyway, once they have feature parity with Windows + current CUDA with a 100% open source stack going back a decade, then I'll consider them again. Until then, I'll happily buy an AMD that's 90% as fast for the same price.
So you weren't around for the 20s? The last 20s?
If you want to actually get momentum out of a rocket, the reaction products are going to touch the combustion chamber walls and the nozzle. While film cooling can help with minimizing heat transfer from the hot stuff, I doubt it’s enough to keep this stuff from eating your engine from the inside.
This is a very worrisome perspective about undefined behavior. It suggests that the issue with undefined behavior is that there is a bug in your code and it's the bug that is the problem. But that's not (entirely) the case, the issue with undefined behavior is that compilers exploit it in ways that propagate this behavior in an entirely unbounded fashion that can result in bugs not only at the very moment that the undefined behavior happens, but even before it, ie. the infamous time travelling undefined behavior [1].

Getting rid of undefined behavior will not get rid of bugs, and no one thinks that memory safe languages somehow are bug free and certainly C++ code will not be bug free even if undefined behavior is replaced with runtime checks. What eliminating undefined behavior does is it places predictable boundaries on both the region of memory and the region of time that the bug can affect.

[1] https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20140627-00/?p=63...
Then why are you in this thread
I'm building Recon Wave (https://reconwave.com) - we monitor companies online perimeter and let them know when something's wrong.

Recon Wave basically finds and scans all their services - DNS, IPs, Apps, Ports - and notify customers when it breaks some policy (aka. "no ports than 443 should be open") or when some service is straight vulnerable.

I'm former security engineer and I hated all that "critical reports" that reported missing CSP header.

We're now playing with an idea to build LLM pentesting agent that could run agains the whole infra of our customers.
I think being "on call" is a sign you're not doing engineering in your role, but that's not absolute and kind of a deeper discussion about what "software engineering" even means.
nice! can you support safari?
Long lead times are dooming some proposed gas plant projects
Which should make it easier to provide a source. Other comments have already done so, I was able to read up on it.
Can you suggest some examples?

That is a big "if".
While all of the languages you mention are memory safe (as is almost every programming language released after 1990), none of them solve all of the safety problems mentioned above, in particular, the two points:

- Rust completely eliminates null pointer dereferencing
- Rust prevents data races in concurrent code, which the paper's approach doesn't address at all

Scala comes closest to solving these points, since it has optional features (in Scala 3) to enable null safety or you could build some castles in the sky (with Scala 2) to avoid using null and make NPEs more unlikely. The same goes for concurrency bugs: you can use alternative concurrency models that make data races harder (e.g. encapsulate all your state inside Akka actors).

With Go and Java there is no dice. These languages lack the expressive power (by design! since they are touted as "simple" languages) to do anything that will greatly reduce these types of bugs, without resorting external tools (e.g. Java static analyzers + annotation or race condition checkers).

In short, Rust is one of the only mainstream languages that absolutely guarantees safety from race conditions, and complete null safety (most other languages that provide good null safety mechanisms like C#, Kotlin and TypeScript are unsound due to reliance on underlying legacy platforms).
Careless people.
> It just seems that the criminals tend to be from one end of the spectrum....

Why would you say so? Are there any studies on proportional crime distribution among politicians worldwide?
Yes, that's what America First was supposed to mean.
Bad news for the victims in Myanmar, probably good news for China because it can expand its influence.
Pretty sure this AI/Agentic/MCP business is going to end up like the service-oriented architecture/Enterprise Service Bus craze of the mid 2000s.
Whatever good ideas of limited scope were present will get stretched out to infest the entire enterprise,
driven by marketing and executives out of touch with life at the hands-on-keyboards level of daily development.
At some point in the future it will be vastly stripped down or ripped out entirely (painfully),
and a few bits and pieces still limping along will be that part everyone has to work around and nobody wants to touch.
infest almost
From the perspective of us looking directly down on a parallel “plate” of a galaxy (with the other galaxy viewing us in the same way), relative differences in speed for the situation of same direction of rotation will be much smaller than for opposite directions.

But between any point in one galaxy to another, just as much matter will be moving closer as moving away. Regardless of same or opposite rotations.

But perhaps greater red shift and greater blue shift (as apposed to lesser of both) as a practical matter of telescopes vs. their cross spectrum sensitivities, means more light detected.
You can still use OpenGL 1.0 and Xlib-like-it's-1999 on modern Linux distributions.
First time hearing of Ente but it looks really nice. I love that there is a self-hosting option, I will try my hand at it as soon as possible.
A very outdated saying. Cars and IoT are very much things people pay for, but tech enables companies to double-dip and turn them into billboards for the highest ad bidder.
> My German isn't good enough to read the original text about this case, but if the sentiment behind https://natlawreview.com/article/data-mining-ai-systems-trai... is correct, I wouldn't be surprised if this would also fall under some kind of legal exception.

That's something completely different. One is about copyright of stuff that was shared publically, while the other is about sharing private communications, violating their personal rights (not copyright).

But of course, we'll have to see, I'm not a lawyer either.
I read this some time ago and really enjoyed it, and personally, it does align somewhat with how I feel about the world. I don't treat it like a bible or anything, but the concept of, at some point, being the consciousness inside of everyone, past and future, does make a certain amount of sense to me
data: text/html, <html contenteditable>
Well, there is the RTX PRO 6000. Maybe you could double those up, no NVLink though.
Given predicted decline i global population size, some of these effect will be partially offset by less pressure from the population.