skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
We could, it's just not high up on the priority list. Any particular reason you want php?
> That isn't an AI image.

What's your source for that assertion? The image has AI-isms and is suspiciously similar to a much less AI-looking image that someone else in the thread linked to in a PDF regarding the research. You can say it looks like a human could've done it, but that's not any less "winning an argument in your own head" unless you've got evidence of what human drew that image.
To this day I'm frustrated that developers (web devs mostly) tossed XML aside for JSON and the requisite JavaScript to replace relatively straight forward things like converting structured data to something a browser could display.

I bought into and still believe in the separation of data and its presentation. This a place where XML/XSLT was very awesome despite some poor ergonomics.

An RSS XML document could live at an endpoint and contain in-line comments, extra data in separate namespaces, and generally be really useful structured data for any user agent or tool to ingest. An RSS reader or web spider could process the data directly, an XSLT stylesheet could let a web browser display a nice HTML/CSS output, and any other tools could use the data as well. Even better any user agent ingesting the XML could use in-built tools to validate the document.

XSLT to convert an XML feed to pretty HTML is a great example of the utility. Browsers have fast built-in conversion engines and the resulting HTML produced has all the normal capabilities of HTML including CSS and JavaScript. To the uninitiated: the XML feed just links to an external XSL stylesheet, when a web browser fetches the XML it grabs the stylesheet and transforms the XML to an HTML (or XHTML) representation that's then fed back into the browser.

A feed reader will fetch the XML and process it directly as RSS data and ignore the stylesheet. Some other user agent could fetch the XML and ignore its linked stylesheet but provide its own to process the RSS data. Since the feed has a declared schema pretty much any stylesheet written to understand that schema will work. For instance you could turn an RSS feed into a PDF with XSLT.
so it it state of israel, or society with a slogan death to arabs? can you decide? For me it’s clear from everything you wrote, so don’t sugar it up with "it’s about state". Here you clearly blame majority of Israelis of wanting a genocide. A generalization like this with so few arguments show your actual true motivation – hate against israelis and jews.
Yes, capitalist principles are indeed pragmatic, hence why he chose them.
If your case is valid you won't get fired for standing up for yourself. You might take some political damage but the guy willing to waste your sleep time was going to lay you off/betray you anyway.
Employees are also subject to the Working Time Directive in EU countries which sets limits to the amount of overtime that is permitted in a week and in a month. Unfortunately in most countries it's full of loop holes.
You're confusing two different kinds of damage.

There is the kind that makes you stronger or more adapted -- muscles, callouses. Then there's the kind that's just bad. Injuries, the flu, stress. Lightning is the second kind. The tree doesn't get stronger. The tree doesn't adapt. It just gets damaged.

If someone whacks me on the head so I get concussed, but kills a bee in the process about to sting me, are you going to say that whacking me on the head was "beneficial damage"? That would be crazy. Sure it's helpful that some vines get killed. That's something separate from the damage caused by the lightning to the tree. The tree is still damaged from it, in the bad way.
The Art of DJing: Avalon Emerson (2019)
Card carrying member of the Australian Plant Society here! Prior to flowering plants (Angiospermae; 140MYA) we had ferns (Polypodiopsida; 360MYA) and Fungi (>1000MYA).

I suspect a large number of Australian fern species, especially those with elevated situations (epiphytes) such as Asplenium (colloquially "Birds Nest Ferns") and Platycerium ("Staghorns" and "Elkhorns") as well as those with substantial frond sizes Todea barbara ("King Fern") or Pteridium esculentum ("Bracken Fern") or tree-like stature Cyathea/Dicksonia ("Tree Ferns") may have evolved partly to benefit from fire for spore release and long distance transmission due to fire-related updrafts. This could make sense because they may usually otherwise be 'trapped' in high moisture locations without due to an absence of strong updrafts facilitating ascending to higher altitudes yielding potential for longer distance transmission. Just as ferns are often the first greenery to emerge from winter landscapes in the northern hemisphere, ferns are often the first visible greenery to return to burned bushland... after moisture.

Based on their age I suspect a large number of fungi probably respond to fire, especially subterranean species that are likely subject to only partial thermal trauma.

Stepping back from fire to lightning, I similarly suspect "getting hit by lightning" and/or consequent canopy opening elicits a fungal response which also benefits trees that are victim to lightning strike.
That's how "communism" is in India. Two states (West Bengal and Kerala) are run by "Communist" parties. But these parties are quite different from what people typically mean by "Communists".
Apple isn't technically forced to do this, they're an American company. They could instead withdraw entirely from the EU market and then they don't have to follow any EU laws. Of course, Apple will never do that because selling their phones in the EU makes _way_ more money than complying with the regulations will cost them.
That page isn't really responsive to my comment. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make!

Of course if you point a directional radio transmitter at an observer, you are not being stealthy, to that observer.

Of course if you power up a 100 gigawatt incandescent rocket motor, you're loudly advertising your presence. (No different than a stealth aircraft using afterburners—they don't). Stealth spacecraft would necessarily avoid doing that. Stealth spacecraft could, to highlight one option from a large decision space, consider cryogenic, cold-gas thrusters with invisible output plumes and zero infrared emissions.
> the novelty wears off.

Hardly. I pretty much have been using LLM at least weekly (most of the time daily) since GPT3.5. I am still amazed. It's really, really hard to not be bullish for me.

It kinda reminds me the days I learned Unix-like command line. At least once a week, I shouted to me self: "What? There is a one-liner that does that? People use awk/sed/xargs this way??" That's how I feel about LLM so far.
This is great, I’ve been looking for performant and safe XML processing to replace IBM stuff (websphere/datapower) that we really only keep around for hw accelerated payload processing. At our scale, lxml and others + BYO gateway tech has a similar run cost even considering IBM licensing. I hate running their crap, which requires k8s at a version that’s some hair-thin slice above the minimum supported EKS version, it’s almost like they want us to live in 24/7 fear of being OOS.
If the internet is to be believed they did not have one way mirrors in the 17th century. They were invented in the early 1900s.

However, looking at the patent for what is supposed to be the first it says that there were earlier attempts--they just sucked because making the partially reflective layer was difficult and expensive and not durable enough when used on outdoor advertising devices.

Yes, you read that right. Advertising. Technology being driven by someone's desire to show ads is not new.

The thing the inventor was building was a case for displaying advertising posters. The case had a glass front, and the poster was behind the glass, with powerful lights behind the poster. When the lights were off the glass would appear to people looking at the case to be a mirror. When the lights were on the poster could be seen.
Your lib requires manually creating both a serializing and deserializing function.
If the functions are out of sync, bad things happen.

Consider copying Cereal, which solves this problem by requiring you to create a single templated function ( https://uscilab.github.io/cereal/ )
Even better, OP shared something OP didn’t write but thought it was interesting.
Interesting, the idea that a fault is a more of a line source makes sense it is hard for me to think of a way to have a single point source slip with enough energy. I guess I've thought in subduction faults the depth of the slip might explain why there is a point source. For example in the Pacific Northwest the earthquake from the Juan de Fuca plate look to be substantially deeper than this one. (50km vs 10km) Of course I expect the depth from today to be preliminary and be adjusted later, I can see the extent of red region in the shakemap changed to be longer from when I looked at it an hour or two ago.

Do you know if the line source model comes from having more and better seismographs or has there been a change in how people think about the motion of a fault in an earthquake?
Is that "MCP security" or "MCP, security"?

I like personal proactive learning, but the financing and investments don't excite me now. There is so much uncertainty that "pay as you go" seems like a good idea. Between tariffs and somehow the bottom falling out with crypto (e.g. stablecoins have all the problems of fractional reserve banking without regulators to bail them out.) If AI succeeds it will screw things up, if it fails it screws things up. My experience though is making a bear bet is pretty dangerous though as markets can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.
> Now the Canadian government wants to know exactly how the electric carmaker managed to move two cars a minute off its lots — a rate that assumes those four dealers had stayed open 24 hours from Jan. 10 to Jan. 12.

How does it take more than 2 months to figure this out?

It seems super straightforward to request purchasing data and if the branch manager won't provide it then seems a pretty straightforward fraud lawsuit.
Its funny because I'm younger than you by a couple of years and I can remember the big parallel ports on keyboards before PS/2 became popular! PS/2 still feels modern to me in comparison
> We use a similarly flawed model every day: fruit and vegetables. What's in one group or the other is based on vague similarities and is mostly arbitrary, but it's still useful to split the huge category of "edible plant parts" into more manageable chunks.

This is completely wrong. Those categories aren't any smaller, in a practical sense, than the combined category "plants". The gain in manageability is zero.

The reason we divide the categories that way is that we put them to different purposes, not that they'd be too large if combined.
I was this many days old when I learned the word "imbricated".
I don't really agree with framing it as lazy. Adding more tools and steps to your workflow isn't free, and the cost/benefit of each tool will be different for everyone. I've lost count of how many times someone has evangelized a software tool to me, LLM or not. Once in a while they turn out to be useful and I incorporate them into my regular workflow, but far more often I don't. This could be for any number of reasons like it does not fit with my workflow well, or I already have a better way of doing whatever it does, or the tool adds more friction than it remove.

I'm sure spending more time fiddling with the setup of LLM tools can yield better results, but that doesn't mean that it will be worth it for everyone. In my experience LLMs fail often enough at modestly complex problems that they are more hassle than benefit for a lot of the work I do. I'll still use them for simple tasks, like if I need some standard code in a language I'm not too familiar with. At the same time, I'm not at all surprised that others have a different experience and find them useful for larger projects they work on.
They're doing natural science on a thing full of complex purposive undesigned machinery. There used to be Artificial Life conferences -- the proceedings were pretty interesting. Now the objects of study are getting past a "gosh that's cute" level but I doubt anyone here's misled by the title.
dangit, thanks. can't edit now though...
> reading the wrong thing from the wrong backalley of the internet, and suddenly they are taken over by a mind virus of sorts. What a wild future.

This already happens to people on the internet.
> developer ergonomics

That was a huge reason JSON took over.

Another reason was the overall XML ecosystem grew unwieldy and difficult to navigate: XPath, XSLT, SOAP, WSDL, Xpointer, XLink, SOAP, XForms... They all made sense in their own way, but it was difficult to master them all. That complexity, plus the poor ergonomics, is what paved the way for JSON to become preferred.
I would say there is a high socialist elements - a parent doesn't have to sacrifice their economic comfort or even time just to give their kids a better education or better lifestyle. But many do so.
Would you really drink the rest of an opened beverage after it was left in your car overnight, though?
The argument is mainly false, because regular democracy already recognizes that the masses are morons, and does not let them self-govern.

It's a kind of theatre whereby we elect certain representatives but the vast bulk of the government bureaucracy stays the same.

Trump and Co. are testing/challenging that system in a way: they are trying to wrestle power away from that immovable mountain of bureaucracy, into the hands of the elected government, and that bureaucracy, used to taking their immovability for granted (along with their jobs and budget money) isn't liking it.
Is it ironic or fitting that a man who designed a building where everyone could be observed is now observed himself for eternity. His preserved corpse is on display at University College London.
Yes - if it were open-source, you could self host it.
In cursor you can whitelist commands. So I white list npm run. Then tell cursor to upgrade a dependency and run npm run build and if there’s errors. Fix the first error and repeat. Once the build is successful, run npm test and fix 1 test at a time.

Takes some learning but once you figure it out it’s insanely powerful.
Ants are vegetables
"Capitalism" is a very confusing word that should be avoided in a serious discussion one way or the other, society is a lot more complex than that. For instance "crony capitalism" is also seemingly capitalism but is directly opposed to the broad principles of a market economy that people think of as good.
A while ago I asked Gemini to set an alarm, it said "Sure!"

...that was the LLM responding, and it did not set an alarm.
HN has always had people crazy/shitty enough to genuinely espouse beliefs similar to the one presented here. They rarely even get flagged or downvoted, so apparently it's not that offensive to the HN audience, which means you can only assume it to be within the community's overton window.

So no, you cannot assume these things are sarcasm unless you are perfectly willing to just mis-categorize all crazies as "just sarcastic".
think about it more
Are you using a supported distro?
By the way I looked through the code, and had to read about metaprogramming in C++. I wonder why is it so complicated? For example, why constraints like std::is_integral are represented by structs. Doesn't make much sense to me. A function wouldn't be better here?
Yeah that's actually what I meant to type
The question was not about if being manipulative socially later in life is not a benefit. Of course it is a benefit.

But you get graded based on your ability to read, write, do math, memorize data points. Not on your ability to lie to your teacher in a believable manner.

You may excel later in life, but it's not like you can enter Yale because you can manipulate people.

You also need a certain level of other intelligence to properly manipulate people, or at least a certain level of self narcissism.

I mean you kind of proved my point, perhaps we should be teaching/discussing social skills.
The inability of people to go through the power process has deep psychological implications, described in depth in "Industrial Society and It's Future"
I think HN can be quite forgiving when it comes to jokes, as long as they are genuinely funny and fresh. What doesn't go well is predictable reference humor and tired old memes.
Startup Founder Found Guilty of Fraud in JPMorgan Case
Ok, we put the sandbox in the title above. Thanks!

(Submitted title was "We hacked Google's A.I Gemini and leaked its source code (at least some part)")
They wanted to use Claude, but had to settle for Gemini, as they just couldn't justify paying those API token prices.
It actually helps the tree by killing parasitic vines. Based on just the parasites, it could be beneficial to the tree to get hit directly compared to only nearby trees dying.
From the HN guidelines:

> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.

Arguably this is misleading or clickbait, but safer to err on the side of using the original title.
> AFAIK HN posts should match the title of the article they link to.

I am not aware of such rule's existence.

Also "should" not "must."

To be clear: I don't have a problem with you submitting this, but the title appears to be completely false.
McMaster researchers discover new class of antibiotics
I am. Running arch with sway. Im on an older intel one, everything just works.

Suspend works
Fingerprint reader works
Battery life when not running heavy workloads is around 13 hours
See https://frame.work/linux for the distros we recommend for each generation.
* You aren't clear about the goal. The middle of your screen says "Redefining Document Signing" in smaller font but in a blue pill. Immediately under that in large font it says "Turn PDFs toContract Templates in seconds". Which is it? Those are not the same thing.

* Then there's "5x faster document workflows — AI that auto-fills, explains, and builds reusable templates in seconds." Which is yet another thing that is discreet from the above.

* If you're going to have features based on AI, you need to be very clear and very loud about how and to what extent your any AI feature has access to my data. I need a super-charged privacy policy there, and I want you to be terrified of the consequences of violating your promises.

* "Get Up and Running Within A Week" That's forever to sign a document, which I think is the central purpose of this service?

* Your comparison slider between the traditional process and yours is comparing two very different things: what looks like a government form and an email. I can't take anything away from that.

* At the top of the page there's a "give us your email for early access" box, but at the bottom there's a whole form. What do I get from one that I don't get from the other?

Basically, your site isn't clear about the focus of this service. I would guess the template things are the primary use-case you're interested in. And in general the landing page doesn't inspire confidence. Tell me about security. Tell me that you take having and working with my data seriously.
All except fractional scaling worked for me out of the box with Mint. Fractional scaling isn't working just for Linux reasons rather than a Framework limitation (in my case, I'm using Regolith, and wayland is still experimental and not default).
Maybe I'm just dense but is there a sample curl somewhere for how to send something to the API URL I just got in my signal chat with BotMaster.1000?
Actually the rule is designed to let you correct misleading titles:

"Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize." - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

I've done that now (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43509103).

I appreciate your scruples though! Because even though you would have been on the right side of HN's rules to correct a misleading (and/or linkbait) title, the fact that you work for Google would have opened you to the usual gotcha attacks about conflict of interest. This way we avoided all of that, and it's still a good submission and thread!
The fascism is consolidating power in the executive branch by having a billionaire gut the federal bureaucracy while trying to intimidate judges who rule against the administration and critical news agencies, among other things. Gun restrictions are a separate topic, and there is no serious chance that ordinary citizens are gong to form a militia to take on the US Military.
I haven't seen or touched a 6502 based computer since 1986. Are people using those ancient computers or actually using new(er) ones? I see 6502 based kits are available as are some new SBCs.
It's the first podcast I ever heard of, when my friend first explained that word to me. Glad to see it's still around.
No, the problem with attributes is that people consistently misuse them. So many things about XML break down when you make everything a self closing tag with 50 attributes. So many programmers just seem to say, "oh, it's shorter text so it must be inherently better" or "oh it's one-to-one so I should strictly avoid anything resembling a heirarchy."

Like I think this guy is mostly correct in identifying bad XML: https://www.devever.net/~hl/xml

Though I don't necessarily agree with the "data format" framing. This idea that markup languages are not data formats seems confused.

> They don't. You absolutely don't need a schema. If you declare a schema, it should exist. If not, no problem?

I agree that they should not.

However, I have used many tools that puke when presented with XML fragments or XML with no schema.
Sometime attribute use goes too far such as when they contain comma separated lists of items.
Have used Pages/Numbers/Keynote for years, alongside MS Word/Excel/Powerpoint, and always found the former to have better or nicer workflows for most tasks, and especially for page layouts. (Excel is however superior for very large or complex spreadsheets.) Highly underrated software.
The missing title happens to be quite effective click bait, so I would keep it :)
But wouldn't the thing we're replacing it with also be a hard plastic? Then we're reducing the use of more persistent hard plastics but we're not reducing hard plastic use overall.
Thanks, that is definitely a downside to the shift operator overloading approach. I'll take that onboard and investigate whether a single operator to handle both would mesh with the current design.
I know it's a convention since the inception of the language, but the operator overload abuse of the bitshift operator still makes me sad every time I see it :(
Here ya go. I use this for various notifications for my home network, versus using email.

https://github.com/bbernhard/signal-cli-rest-api
No, because that's not a useful statistic in the context being discussed.

The number of children directly supporting parents has more meaning especially when looking at economic data.
I mean, it's not the terminal that's the problem with Lumon, it's the other things you mentioned like slaves & child labor that are problematic.

Its a cool retro (real) terminal.
To be abundantly clear, this was a dingy crummy apartment in a rough neighborhood. For the first few months I lived there I literally would hide my monitor whenever I left the house.

After a while, I grew to love it. I left the monitor out because I was tired of being afraid all the time, I hugged the floor since it meant the next eviction would be up to me.

I have so many fond memories of 2009/2010 KTown, such a great place to live on a budget.

It's gone now, you need a six-figure income to live there like anywhere else in Los Angeles
I used to think this but Grok 3 is definitely one of the most powerful LLMs available to consumers. It may just be because they are burning money offering features (reasoning, deep search) for free that OpenAI charges for, but it has become my main LLM for general purpose use