skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm not certain what MAGA-phobic could mean etymologically, since a "phobia" is an irrational fear of something, such as an irrational fear of people transitioning sex. Opposition to MAGA is typically rooted in the very rational and well-evidenced fear that one might be persecuted for their religious affiliation or sexuality, among other things.
That example actually underlines parents point. Because, yes, delivered food is convenient. However, at least in my experience, delivered food from a professional chef is always inferior to what I'd get if I actually visited the same restaurant. Yes, packaging has improved and fried stuff isn't as gross at it used to be, but it is still not the same level of quality compared to actually going there.
Go Optimization Guide
Samsung famously "fixed" the retention problems in firmware by having it periodically rewrite data in the background, but that doesn't work if the SSD is powered off.
Arguably, the solid rocket motor is in this vein. While I've never seen a design that consumes the outer shell, the inner material is designed to burn as completely as possible, and the chemistry and physical composition is even designed to cause the burn to happen in a proper combustion-chamber shape.
It's a huge compliance hurdle at my company to add any new vendor, so we almost exclusively use open models that we can run on our own hardware (or our rented cloud instances). Even just getting Bedrock enabled in one of our existing AWS accounts has been in the works for months.
The cost of browsers not having extremely-basic things that they either started to implement then abandoned in a nigh-useless state (login, frames) or never even tried to have but really, really should have once it was clear "web apps" were here to stay (datasource-backed lists and tables, table sorting without more custom JS than a sort function, drag-n-drop) is truly enormous. Who knows how many millions of person-hours.
> It's an ontological issue, if everyone is potentially compromised, how do you know anything ?

You just made a strong case for freedom of speech and free press.
> Why should people be prevented from voting now for someone because of previous rules made by a previous electorate? Why should someone from the past be allowed to nullify my preferred vote in the present?

All elections follow rules set by a previous electorate unless you want to first vote on defining the rules for an election every time you have an election.

If Trump were to actually run for a 3rd term, would you argue that he should be able to because term limits were set in place by a previous electorate?
Yea, and to be fair the leagues try to compensate for this with varying degrees of success by regulating how much you can spend, subsidizing poorer teams, etc.

But ultimately you run into issues like the colorado rockies where the owner just views it like an entertainment venue and basically refuses to invest in the team in any rational way. The entire model of competiton-through-investment doesn't make as much sense once you realize you can place butts in seats without a competent team to root for.

(And personally, i think it makes a lot of sense for the team to own itself, or a state to own a team, or something like that. I think the Green Bay Packers have a setup like this.)

It's also not possibly to divvy players rarely—sometimes you run into people who are truly extraordinary, and exorbitant salaries can help balance this, to debatable efficacy.

Edit: yup, https://www.packers.com/community/shareholders. Kind of an orthogonal issue to disproportionate spending of teams, though.
Microsoft employees recall their early years
This is for system-level permissions. In third-party apps, the app asks whether you want to enable X permission and then you get an OS-level confirmation request. It's not just in Europe.

Likely they'll fall back in Europe to double-prompting as well in system apps.
I read this as "Kaggle for Kids" which also seems like a lovely idea.
Open model is such a misnomer: it's like calling an ELF an "open executable".

Distributing things for free doesn't make them "open". The reality is that free (as in free beer) weights are closer to freeware than anything open source. In fact, since all these models are build using pirated media a more appropriate term could be plain old warez.
Likely, how else do they make money.
How about everything needed for full reproducibility?

This is what I would like to see
Right—I agree that they'll be fine once they hatch & become a greater being. I was responding to this comment:

> if there's a torture that you've heard of, or any cautionary tale you've seen reported, you are going to experience it or have already -- and without learning anything at all.

which suggests that there's something horrifying about the cycles of forgetting that take place inside the egg, while the protagonist is still human.
They could provide access to the training code. It's useful for training smaller models or distilling larger ones. They don't need to release every details involved in tuning the optimization parameters during the pre-training stage.
It just doesn't help that much to be worth the change in mechanics and the compromise on grip strength - too much energy, too quickly to effectively dissipate. I stopped playing competitively in my teens and I still remember how much that hurts.
It's TEA time: Nestful now manages state with Gleam and Lustre
Is this getting into questions like "Where did the singularity come from?" and "What came before the singularity?". We don't have a way to answer these kinds of questions.
Kagi and NextDNS are the two subscriptions I have that I couldn't live without, you should give Kagi a go.
Is it an illusory artifact or is it all that exists? If it can't be observed, it can't be tested, it can't be verified in any way or ever interacted with, then isn't it just an instances of Russell's Teapot and thus does not exist? What does it mean for science if existence isn't a binary property or one that we set as a truth yet is entirely untestable?
Maybe I am misunderstanding? What is the bad stuff, you want blocked?

OP comment comes off as "I want Kagi to do it for me and to be how I want it" when Kagi doesn't know what you want blocked. How can it? If Kagi is to support blocking why wouldn't they?

I am saying what Kagi wants to block may not be the bad stuff you want blocked and so you should then verify the content of what is blocked.
same can be said about digital tech/infrastructure in general!
There is no Apple country, at least not yet.
Read the rest of his comment

> Not that I'm a rabid atheist or would deny my child such a thing, but if THAT can enter my 8yr olds brain via his short allowed time where he can browse by himself, i'm worried what else is coming his way through it.
The Moon Internet-cable lets you jump
From today, a gigantic internet cable runs from the earth to the moon. Because the moon revolves around the earth, the cable also passes your schoolyard. All children and adults must therefore make a jump over this cable once a month.
Just using the TV web browser. Do you have kids? Mine are so easily distracted in the mornings. It spawned from the bewilderment of them having so few jobs to do in the morning (compared to us parents) and the complete lack of focus
This is also very much how the page looks for me in Firefox. If it can't fail without issues it's not an option I'd select.
I think DudePerfect have an app that is essentially this. Heavily curated kid friendly content. It might only be paid though.
This is a different tact than your original assertion. The child welfare system as a whole in the US is abysmal. Its severely understaffed, underfunded, and neglected in ways that would turn any decent persons stomach.

With that, I agree.

What I specifically posit however, is that CPS workers generally are not targeting well adjusted children in good homes. Even this organization you link to doesn't posit this.

What I do see here, and perhaps the NCCPR has a point, is that there should be better definitions of when a child should be taken from their home vs other types of interventions, because the foster care system in this country is truly terrible. Namely, they seem to be advocating for intervention policies on direct harm vs indirect harm, where indirect harm is defined as things like insufficient food, clothing, shelter or supervision. By shifting this definition the NCCPR argues that kids in real danger would get the attention they deserve and it would ease the burden on the child welfare system because less children would end up in the system, and stem the tide of reports and therefore resources used per investigation etc.

The tl;dr I get from the NCCPR's website as well as this interview about its work[0] (and the director) is the legal standard is too loose to be useful and should be better defined to significantly reduce the rate of false positives

Given the realistic chances of significant reform in the US around child welfare, I think maybe the NCCPR has a point, I'll explore that further, but its not that CPS workers are snatching well adjusted children from good homes. I see no evidence of that

[0]: https://www.npr.org/2023/11/30/1211781955/deluged-child-welf...
have you tried loro
> Some of this is isel

Yes, and it's not constrained by whatever lowest common denominator was chosen at the moment of publishing the application or library.

Anyway

https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/libraries/Sy...

https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/libraries/Sy...

https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/libraries/Sy...

https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/libraries/Co...

https://godbolt.org/z/MfnWd19n8 (sometimes you get AVX2 cores on Godbolt, sometimes AVX512 so I'm forcing it via NativeAOT for a better example)

Having the runtime pick the optimal instruction set for all the paths above requires exactly zero steps from the user, much like with using DynamicPGO (which is why forms of static PGO are not comparable for the common case).

> autovec

Most performance critical paths which are not explicitly vectorized in C++ or Rust are either very fragile and not autovectorized at all. If you care about performance, it is way better to have good SIMD abstractions. Which is what .NET heavily invests into over (very expensive) loop autovectorization phase. Although at this point it does almost everything else, but there are way more impactful areas of investment. If you care about SIMD - use Vector128/256/512 and/or platform intrinsics instead for much better results.

Although I can't shake off the impression that you are looking for gotchas here and details aren't of particular interest.
I dunno, to be pedantic, cheese is a convenient version of milk. I like both though.
The G in MSG is glutamate, so not an "also"... as its been covered by OP.
Main way I learned how to program was computer magazines and copying code. I still do things like redrawing reference architecture diagrams from scratch, because I can focus on each portion and think about how the data flows between services.
Sure, it's a logical move; deep-sea mining is destructive to the environment, so let's do it. "Drill baby drill".
> Wifi not being available isn't the fault of FreeBSD.

No. Just because it's available doesn't mean it's good. Until FreeBSD supports modern Wifi (4/5, i.e 802.11n/ac) then you're just ticking the box to say you've got it, but Linux actually supports these modern network setups and FreeBSD does not. There is no debating this at this point in time.

And to be clear, I'm referencing wifibox (https://github.com/pgj/freebsd-wifibox) which has been written about extensively and exists to work around FreeBSDs well known poor wifi support.

> So stop throwing that this is FreeBSDs fault

Nope, it's on FreeBSD if they want it. They appear to have finally prioritized it but it's not there yet.

https://freebsdfoundation.org/blog/january-2025-laptop-suppo...
We don't digest food exclusively with bacteria. They play a role, of course, but our digestion is done through things with hydrochloric acid and various enzymes produced by the stomach. The bacteria in our stomach is pretty much strains that can both survive the acidic environment and can consume things we cannot digest at all. Various fibers, for example. They help as they consume it and shit out stuff we can digest. Often the things they consume that are indigestible to us are the result of our own breakdown of other compounds; making the process symbiotic.

Also, the environment on a kitchen counter is wildly different than the environment inside out stomach, so airborne bacteria- even if we were to presume these were the exact same kinds of bacteria present in our stomach - being uninterested in foods in the open air doesn't really translate to the idea that the food is indigestible. Many gut bacteria rely on us to break down foods into the things that they can digest, so a colony couldn't start on the surface of the same food(s) in the open air.
>Does that sound like the kind of stuff that fair, well run by rule of law, stable democracies with lots of buy in from the populace do to you?

...Yes?

Or are you saying politicians can just barge in and say "the rules don't apply to me because I'm popular"? Because that's how you don't get stable democracies. What you get is Trump, or the Red Brigades, or the Brown Shirts running things to the ground. Because the motto of those orgs is "one man, one vote... One last time"
Doge accesses federal payroll system and punishes employees who objected
Open source what exactly? It's a piece of wood turned on a lathe. Not an atom bomb
And, unlike penicillin, lithium doesn't cause resistant strains of bacteria to evolve. A solid win all around.
> if it won't achieve the goal of reducing drug use?

If they tried decriminalization with the specific goal of reducing drug use then uhh yeah that was doomed from the start. You decriminalize certain drugs because you want to reduce possession/use arrests and view the treatment as worse than the disease. Arrests for use/possession serve one important function for people which is getting users out of public view even if it doesn't reduce drug use or work at all to get people off them. And Oregon found out how many people value clean streets at the expense of drug users. Can't really blame them.
Obviously they have to follow the rules for how to count votes, establish boundaries, etc.

But there is definitely a serious philosophical argument that term limits are inherently undemocratic.

I personally think they're necessary, but at the same time I realize they are undemocratic. They're literally taking away the ability for an electorate to freely choose.

All I'm saying is, the tradeoffs get messy. Restricting candidates from running can be a slippery slope. Look at what's happening in Turkey, where the popular opposition candidate was just barred from running. How do you know when you've gone too far? Barring candidates can corruptly entrench power, even when following the "rules" to the letter. What then?
You're right, I forgot the indirection. Inner Interpreter instruction is actually: JMP [,y++]
I think you can only whitelist channels that are approved kids channels, not from the full youtube library, but it does allow you to avoid the ocean of crap and pick just the good stuff.
>I'd bet that no one actually likes to write code

And you'd be wrong. I, for one, enjoy the process of handcrafting the individual mechanisms of the systems I create.
In related news, I know you are, but what am I?
Perfect only if you have a small list that is allowed...
Oh ... it's actually their own integrated translation that breaks it. Now that's funny. They aren't escaping correctly. Now if someone wants to play around with that ...
Church-goer son-of-a-pastor die-hard-reformed christian here in agreement...

sorry there are too many whackos out there. I'd feel more comfortable with my kids learning from Catholic Priests than some random youtuber. In fact, my kids are probably going to go to catholic school.

The reason why we have denominations in part is to maintain the education of the clergy and keep dogma, or theology, in check.

(even if we disagree at times, at least most of the organized christian church can agree on the basic creeds - something that youtube seems hell bent on for clicks is getting you into nontrinitarian and whacky stuff!)
That's true although I think it not quite the same as freeware in the sense that we can realistically (say) fine tune an open model in ways that don't quite apply to (say) someone sending you a binary
Social media are the problem, so Bluesky doesn't fix anything, but perpetuates the main issue.
I'm glad to hear my suspicions and impressions are accurate. I have a number of friends who have gone into UI over the past 20 years and while they're all very smart people, In my opinion exactly 1 of them has what it takes to work in UI/UX. The rest are mediocre graphic designers with average to no training in graphic design, and zero experience in anything technical. Only one knew what Fitts law was, or what HCI meant, or what GUI meant
Very much in support of this. The use of anthropmorphic or even biological terms are entirely misguided. All they do is drive a narrative that is very much belitting natural intelligence.
Disable JavaScript and you're largely fixed. Amazingly enough there is a large enough contingent doing that such that you are far from unique (and it helps most all of the fingerprinting requires JavaScript)
setAccessible is also used to be able to access private fields, and not just to be able to write to final fields. Most libraries shouldn't need to set final fields, and I say this as someone who was very against when they deprecated java.lang.misc.Unsafe. I've only had to set a final field once in my career and it was related to some obscure MySql/JDBC driver bug/workaround. This particular deprecation seems very sensible to me.
27 times every 28 days, no?
Congrats! Keep up the good work.
You basically also end up needing a burner phone number for these too nowadays. Feels like every one of these I’ve tried in recent months starts with “sign up for 10% off” with an email input, followed by “one more step, give us your phone number!”
Gemma 3 is.
All I have seen is that four people worked for the party while being paid by the EU. Nothing like routing money to advertising campaigns or anything that would actually swing an election. And the headlines are all about embezzlement, not election fraud. So this seems like a stretch.
> In ideal world, we wouldn't have any business.

Said every security company ever. :)
Yeah no this is nonsense powdered by pseudoscience and a wrong premise. Food is not eaten in our stomachs by bacteria, please look up some basic biology and consider correcting your post accordingly. At least your incorrect post isn't dangerous per se.
This seems like a stretch. Another example may be, "If I am throwing a party, should I ask people that I do not invite, what they want?". Sure you could say that they could approximate the wants of the people who _are_ going, but why not just ask the people who are going, directly? It's just noise, otherwise.
Also helps he is not exceptionally tall to keep a lower center of gravity.

Josh Allen on the bills also tries this and is very strong but it's harder for him to get as low.
Coincidentally, I posted an Ask HN on that same question (actually prompted by a post on a different company today), but it hasn't gotten upvoted yet:

Ask HN: Do you penalize hiring candidates from companies that do shady things? | 1 point by neilv 1 hour ago| 3 comments | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43538530
You can't really buy "Government Cheese." It used to be given out as part of food assistance programs in the US. I guess it was pretty okay cheese too. I think it's mostly given out as food assistance to other countries now since we moved over to SNAP debit cards.
He was still right on the screensize, though. I'm furious that they abandoned the mini iPhones :-/
>Maybe I am misunderstanding.

I think you are...

The only thing I've said in this comment chain is that Kagi cannot guarantee that bad stuff won't show up. Which you seem to agree with (despite saying my argument is void, for some reason, before agreeing with it).

The rest has been you having a conversation with... I'm not sure who. Because you're asking a bunch of questions as if I am using this feature. I am not using this feature. Literally the only point I am making is that Kagi cannot guarantee that bad things wont show up.
Yeah that works. I've done piano, jujitsu, hockey, and half a dozen other things with my kid. If they ask to do something I let them, but make them do a commitment. If they hate it, they can stop when the season is over and try something else. The tricky part is to balance ensuring they learn not to quit just because something is hard, with not making them do something for too long that they've just figured out is not for them. Piano and gymnastics were a big no, while they fell in love with the right jujitsu gym.

Not everything has to be competitive or official either. Like you can just go to the community pool during the summer without joining a swim team. I think some parents forget this, but this was normal for previous generations.

So my kid has a few extra curricular activities and then I also do plenty of activities with them at the house like play chess or card games or whatever. They're also watching some of my old favorite sci-fi shows with me. Nearly all of YouTube kids is steaming garbage designed to turn your kid into a mindless consumer. Netflix kids is pretty good though. There are a lot of shows that have character progression and multi season plot arcs that cover complex subjects. Avatar the Last Airbender is an example of a show I was comfortable with my 7 year old watching without worrying about brain rot. Mind you, I think all screen time needs a limit.
and it really tied the room together.
It's a free email account, it is not at all clear that "weird IMAP" is core to that success?

Certainly I moved away to Fastmail, which has better IMAP support (but mostly because Google having full control of my email address was becoming too big of a risk and Google Apps is expensive for your own domain).
As someone currently working on an IMAP client, my strategy has been to start by implementing the base IMAPrev2 specification and checking that it still works with a rev1 server. RFC 9051 has guidance on how to handle servers that use older IMAP protocol versions and is largely backwards compatible.

The goal is to have the client work without any extensions. E.g., if the server doesn’t have the UNSELECT capability it falls back to selecting a nonexistent mailbox (which has the same effect). Obviously there are some very useful extensions that the client needs to support, but those can be viewed as optimizations to reduce network traffic or add extra features if the server supports them.