skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Personally, I would get started using Aider.chat. It's pretty intuitive if you're comfortable in a terminal.

No matter what, the current paradigm is the "mixture of experts", aka defining roles and then switching between the roles. In the case of Aider, you're mainly looking at "architect" and "code". Others like Cline/Roo provide also this, but more limitations and access to MCP. Honestly, I would avoid these more advanced tools until you get an understanding for how everything works.

Begin with your "architect" and agree on a design, then act as an engineering manager to guide your "code" model to implement the tests. Once you have a full test suite, make sure that you can use commands like `/lint` and `/test` to call your toolchain as needed.

I personally prefer this method (again, when you're getting started) because it's independent of every IDE and will work anywhere you have a terminal. After you get comfortable, you'll quickly want to use a more advanced tool to trade your money for the time of the machine(s). When you get to that point you'll understand what the fuss is about.
Dystopian fantasy is not a goal to build towards, what are we doing?
> Or if the judiciary has any sort of bias as is implied in this case. (I don't pretend to know the details)

Then don't assume the judiciary is biased by following up with a disclaim that you are repeating baseless conjecture. Le Pen was judged with her right to legal defense, found guity, and punished accordingly. This is democracy working as it should.

> I enthusiastically endorse the separation of powers and firmly believe that people should follow systems, not people.

Based on the content of your posts, I sincerely doubt your enthusiastic endorsement.

You are very quick to make excuses for the right wing politician that was punished for embezzlement, claimed repeatedly that her being banned from office is undemocratic, and claimed without a shred of evidence that the court that judged her is biased.

Forgive me if I think you are bullshitting me here.

> Perhaps it just a global coincidence, but the recent spate of candidate disqualification (US, Romania, Turkey, France) gives the appearance of democratic decay.

Comparing France to Turkey is pure bad faith argumentation. If you genuinely think that Turkey and France share any sort of democratic decay you are very ill informed.

If Le Pen was not punished, I would agree France was taking a step in creating its own French Erdogan.
Nothing to feel cozy about, that was just an example of how immigrants do in fact help the poor and disadvantaged. In the same way that you mention how working class jobs are now also increasingly done by immigrants. Now if the rotary clubs want to donate money that’s great, but the fact remains that there is a redistribution of wealth happening before our eyes, and the direction is not wealthy -> immigrants, it’s middle class and below -> ultra rich. We are effectively subsidizing the profits of billionaires, while they skirt taxes and lobby for cutting even more funding to the welfare system. The economic divide between the super wealthy and the ever fading middle class is increasing year by year. How is this supposed to function?
I would highly recommend starting w/ OpenRouter - it's easy to play around w/ free models and their documentation is great.

OpenRouter Quickstart: https://openrouter.ai/docs/quickstart

See usage example here (Typescript): https://github.com/brownrw8/olelo-honua/blob/main/src/provid...

And while you're at it, check out my open source project using OpenRouter, ʻŌlelo Honua ;)

ʻŌlelo Honua: https://www.olelohonua.com
I play golf. I write about golf. I genuinely love golf. Over the last 50 years, we have slowly broken the game of golf by allowing incremental technological advancements -- just like this -- that make it easier to do something that is hard, that is making it easier to hit the sweet spot.

I am sending a grave warning to baseball fans here from the future that you will arrive at by following this road.

Golf used to be a finesse game with moments of power. Now everyone is swinging out of their shoes on every shot, and the strategy of the game has reached Nash equilibrium where you basically want to hit the ball as hard as you can at every opportunity, despite any strategic element on the course.

Professional baseball is always what I point to when I talk about what we've lost. You don't need the most optimized equipment to enjoy the game, in fact, ultimately, you don't even want it. Just use simply, standardized equipment, accept the limitations of that equipment, and enjoy a simple game, where strategy can be used to overcome the limitations of equipment. The best thing that the MLB ever did was reject aluminum bats.
>Make everything cheaper all the time, adjust the cost to reflect actual supply/demand, and stop the wiggling banners and big signs and calculations every time I want to buy anything.

Ahh, so you're JC Penney:

https://www.choicehacking.com/2022/11/24/the-psychological-f...

sadly, in some ways engaged customers want to feel like their efforts pay off in "smarter" deals. and that mind game overcomes any genuine attempts to lay everything up front.
Good work, It looks promising. Perhaps feed it with some group info. If you're expecting people to just show up and list their events I don't think you'll get much traction.
Doesn't the timing indicate a link? We can't wave our hands and so 'No Proof!' again and again.
This is kind of a red herring or a tempest in a teapot; we're talking about municipal water use, not agricultural water use. The number being bruited about here is only 89 million gallons per day (3.9kℓ/s in modern units) for 270k people: 14.4 milliliters per second per person, or 1250 liters per day per person, so I guess they water their lawns a lot.

I mean, they say that's three times what Bryan uses now, but Bryan is only 83980 people, so the per-capita use there is actually slightly higher.

You can get water pretty cheaply if you have unlimited energy, and the rapidly dropping prices of solar panels have made that a reality.

The ocean is only 250km a way, and the Sorek desalination plant http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/israel-proves-the-... was already desalinating seawater for 58¢/kℓ in 02016 at 7.1MPa (≡7.1kJ/ℓ). At US$40/MWh (US$11/GJ) the energy would cost 7.9¢/kℓ, so designing the plant to be energy-efficient is an important priority. At US$15/MWh (US$4.20/GJ) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43468177 or less you can afford to use simpler, cheaper designs for the desal plant, at the cost of using more energy. But even at 58¢/kℓ, we're talking about a cost of US$260 per person per year.

This is not the new motherfucking oil. We're not "talking about our survival". It won't "basically stop[] all the economic development we have". Not unless you think rice farming is the path to economic development.

It's trickier for places that are further from the ocean.
Condensing water out of thin air generally requires cooling the air to the dewpoint, removing its heat of vaporization (2.2564MJ/kg ≈ 2.3MJ/ℓ) and letting the air heat back up again. The cooling and reheating process doesn't inherently dissipate energy (you can do it in a countercurrent heat exchanger) and anyway involves much less energy than the condensation does. 2.3MJ/ℓ at US$4.20/GJ is 0.95¢ per liter. At 1250ℓ/day per person, that would be US$12/day per person, a much more alarming figure. Even dividing by the coefficient of performance of a typical vapor-compression heat pump (3 or so), giving us about 0.3¢/ℓ, we're talking about US$4/day per person.

But residential Los Angeles uses 70 gallons per person per day (3.1mℓ/s per person in modern units, or 260ℓ/day per person) https://xtown.la/2023/09/05/residential-water-use-in-los-ang..., though total potable water use is about twice that https://spectrumnews1.com/ca/southern-california/environment..., and at Burning Man we use 6ℓ/day per person (0.07mℓ/s) https://burningman.org/event/preparation/playa-living/water/. 6ℓ/day from a dehumidifier at 0.3¢/ℓ is 1.8¢ a day or US$6.60/year.

We need to find ways to make dehumidifiers cheaper, because at that point the energy cost is basically insignificant.
Some people absolutely do judge people who work at those companies, especially Facebook. Google used to have a halo but that's pretty tarnished now, while Microsoft under Satya seems to have pulled off the unlikely trick of redeeming its reputation.
"You" in this case is the website author. From a user perspective, that doesn't solve the problem.
If it gives any unfair advantage at all, the Astros will figure out a way to use them ASAP.

([1,2] For those that don't get the snide reference to cheating.)

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/article/astros-cheating.html

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houston_Astros_sign_stealing_s...
The article states that the problem is that they looked at random galaxies, 1/3 were moving one way and 2/3 the other.

If the distribution was truly random, and the universe is isotropic, we should see roughly 50/50.
> so long as they don’t affect other permit holders “unreasonably,”
A lot of those phrases come about as a means of forestalling conflict. At 21 you know you know nothing, but you think you know everything.

The truth is the biggest time waster in collaborating with your peers is conflict. So we invented a language of drop in phrases.

I'll go one level higher on ALL those phrases. They ALL mean, "Hey, we've wasted a shit ton of time litigating, fighting, teasing, and getting over ourselves with conflict in this area. I'm gonna drop this phrase to remind everyone in the room we're here to at least try to focus on work, not fucking with each other and rehashing old arguments, so let's just skip that part and stay focused."

At 21 you haven't yet had your year long ego slap down with someone petty and slightly more powerful. You don't know what an orgasmic relief it is to be able to drop one of those phrases and basically say, "Look, let's skip the pissing contest and focus."

Sure, there's more blunt, faster, honest ways to say things. Go for it. Have your year long dick waving contest. Get fired. Then you'll start appreciating jargon.

Now, when I hear jargon, my first thought is, “ooh I wonder who’s life was almost ruined over THAT one!”
> anyone in the next year or two because

If you believe this, just buy otm calls on s&p500 and you won’t have to worry about a job.
Your example was of a politician being condemned. It seems that the system does work as intended after all.

As for the length of punishment, we would have to look in detail what each did.

Two murders may result is different length of imprisonment.
I loved the cartoon effects in "The Mask" with Jim Carrey.

Sort of a tip-of-the-hat to the greats of the cartoon era that has passed.
I read that 9 European representatives, plus 12 assistants, plus 4 other members of the party were found guilty as part of a scheme to earn illegally EUR 2.9M for the party.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affaire_des_assistants_parleme...
As a French person, I can say that this situation will unfold the same way as it did for Trump.

Jordan Bardella is going to take her place and most likely win in 2027. He is well liked by people, he is young and he doesn't have a political legacy. In some polls, they floated his name as a replacement if she was unable to run and he polled 10% + ahead of all his rivals in the first round giving him a very good chance to actually win the run off.

This is exactly how Macron won in 2017 (no political baggage, young) and despite his vows to crush the far right he never managed to do it. Even worse, the far right is far stronger now than it was 8 years ago.

The justice system gave the far right a martyr and that is something that they will use for campaigning.
Show HN: CVE-Bench, the first LLM benchmark using real-world web vulnerabilities
AI agents now have impressive reasoning capabilities. This raises an important question: how dangerous are these AI agents at identifying & exploiting web vulnerabilities?

We created CVE-bench to find out (I'm one contributor of 16). To our knowledge CVE-bench is the first benchmark using real-world web vulnerabilities to evaluate AI agents' cyberattack capabilities. We included 40 CVEs from NIST's database, focusing on critical-severity vulnerability (CVSS > 9.0).

To properly evaluate agents’ attacks, we built isolated environments with containerization and identified 8 common attack vectors. Each vulnerability took 5-24 person-hours to properly set up and validate.

Our results show that current AI agents successfully exploited up to 13% of vulnerabilities without knowledge about the vulnerability (0-day). If given a brief description of the vulnerability (1-day), they can exploit up to 25%. Agents are all using GPT-4o without specialized training.

The growing risk of AI misuse highlights the need for careful red-teaming. We hope CVE-bench can serve as a valuable tool for the community to assess the risks of emerging AI systems.

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17332

Code: https://github.com/uiuc-kang-lab/cve-benchmark

Medium: https://medium.com/@danieldkang/measuring-ai-agents-ability-...

Substack: https://ddkang.substack.com/p/measuring-ai-agents-ability-to...
That doesn’t make sense, they can’t be assumed to have behaved like ideal gasses, thus turbulence alone can cause significant uncertainties.

Let alone all other possibilities combined.
I'm 100% onboard with this. My thought was how are they going to make Serialization work, but looks like they thought of that.

I was trying to think of an edge case with JsonB or JAXB that would be affected by this... but generally those frameworks have told you for quite awhile not to do stupid stuff like:

```
@Getter
public class HelloMessage {
@JsonbProperty
private final String helloMessage;
}
```

I can't think of any frameworks offhand that do this.
There is separation of powers: The legislature made the law, the executive enforces it, the courts interpet it. The legislature is more responsible than the courts, IMHO.

The real responsible person is Marine Le Pen: Don't commit crimes and you won't have these problems.
We've been working on a product called Ketch AI that does some similar things but hopefully adds more value further up the chain.

We track sales from retailers, and use historic sales information to recommend if the sale is good or not (ex some retailers always have XX% off, so you only want to jump on sales that are better than that). In addition, we'll let you sign up for digest alerts, so ideally you get 1 notification a day with all the good sales across all the brands you shop at, rather than hundreds of spammy marketing emails a day.

We don't clickjack affiliate links like Honey, and don't have deals with retailers incentivizing us to promote deals that are worse for the consumer.

Check us out at https://getketch.ai, or start browsing brands at https://members.getketch.ai/brands to get a feel for the product if you're interested
We are in early stages of rolling out these capabilities to our team but we have aligned in VS Code + Cline + Sonnet 3.7. We use databricks but there’s a plugin for snowflake as well in vs code.

Couple of helpful tidbits we’ve learned:

- Define a read me that lays out your architecture. Normalization, libraries to use for different use cases, logging requirements, etc. reference it on every new task.

- keep notebooks from getting too big. A notebook per elt action or table definition make’s your compares faster and required context smaller.

Be prepared to be amazed. We’ve pointed Cline at an api doc and had it spit out elt code and a model that were nearly production ready. We’re pulling weeks off estimates…
Yeah, but that's not a very HN way of doing it though. Bring in the AI, then add some crypto, and the code must be written in Rust. If there's a UI, then Next/React must be used to re-write the existing HTML/CSS only version, because that's just not even trying. Oh, and it needs to be done over a weekend
Interestingly, the Lagarde case was not ruled by "regular" judges, but by a special court "of politicians, by politicians, for politicians". The idea, being, precisely, to try and deal with separation of power, and avoid the judiciary ruling against "the will of the people".

At the time, the decision was controversial because it was too "nice" with the former minister. I'm pretty sure you can find an archive of the FN/RN spokepersons of the time criticizing the "Cour de Justice de la République."

So, instead, let "normal judges" make decisions about all citizens, voters and elected alike ?

Suddenly that does not sound that appealing.

She will run again. She will keep her deputy job. Her "jail" will be much more confortable than Navalny's. She'll have other decades to run in other élections.

Her party will keep winning some, provided gas prices and taxes and rents still go up. I don't see a politician trying anything against that. She'll be fine.
We've addressed that in the JEP. Serialization libraries have a special way to circumvent this (until we get Serialization 2.0), and mocking libraries may, indeed, need to set the flag, but they're rarely used in production, so if they don't enjoy some new optimisation -- no big deal.

BTW, this JEP does not apply to setAccessible generally, as that's been restricted since JDK 16, but only to the particular (and more rare) use of setAccessible to mutate instance final fields. As the JEP says, static final fields, records' internal instance fields, and final instance fields of hidden classes cannot be mutated with that approach currently, so it's never been something that's expected to work in all cases.
> Retailers should charge a single transparent price without having everyone have to go trawling around the Internet for coupon codes which may or may not work.

Then you miss the point of the coupon codes, they're for measuring ad effectiveness. The discount is the incentive for the customer to reveal to the business where they learned about the product and who was responsible for the sale.
Stop blaming the courts (and really, the legislature for making the law).

Le Pen is the person responsible, as is her party: Don't commit crimes, don't make leaders of people who commit crimes, and you won't have problems.

Yes, there is a potential for abuse, but eliminating the rule of law for political leaders is very dangerous. (Edit: You can't take a popular vote on whether someone - especially a political leader, and one in a populist movement - committed a crime.)
Next you'll tell me that combustion engines don't combust without liberal anger to drive the piston.
I think it's fine. For things that aren't too expensive where I am fortunate enough to not have to be price-sensitive, I don't bother with coupons beyond a cursory Google search.

But not everyone is equally fortunate, and for some people the time investment to find the right coupon might be what makes them able to afford a necessity.
Show HN: Neuronpedia, an open source platform for AI interpretability
Mechanistic interpretability is the science of understanding how AI works internally, and Neuronpedia is a interpretability platform with APIs and tools to explore, share, and steer AI models. We're open sourcing it today along with 4TB of interp data. Blog post here: https://www.neuronpedia.org/blog/neuronpedia-is-now-open-sou...
BASICODE: the 8-bit programming API that crossed the Berlin Wall
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1vCpm1-9Yc

https://github.com/robhagemans

In German https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEsOwE_dpiU
I've already clearly described the trend and given you multiple avenues to look at the data

You have described the trend with no evidence that people have someone overcome their need for food and shelter with no concrete data and just to look it up.

HN guidelines expect intellectual curiosity, not spoon feeding (maybe that's also a change in cultural norms)

It’s also the norm to back up your assertions with citations and quotes.

And you are cherry picking something that doesn’t support your evidence of something obvious - most people need to work to eat. There is a difference between “building wealth” and not being homeless and hungry. Poor people without the support of mommy and daddy must focus on the very bottom of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.

You did say 40 years ago

https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/beyond-the-countercultur...

Notice that before the 60s, neither the poor or especially minorities had access to the schools that were populated (and surveyed) by people who saw college as a way to obtain “self actualization”

Also notice it was in the 60s when schools became accessible to people who weren’t in a high income household and had to stay at home. These students were also more interested in getting better jobs

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286516315_The_Rise_...

And family background - ie people with money was the main determinant of people getting into college before the 1960s

https://lhendricks.org/Research/borrowing/paper.pdg

It has always been people who knew that they weren’t going to be homeless or hungry that could afford to think about higher levels of needs like “self actualization” could focus on that over “I need to get a degree to make sure I’m
not homeless, hungry and naked”

You think people are going to get in tens of thousands of debt, without the support of affluent parents as a back stop aren’t mostly concerned about getting a job to pay off said debt?

Those opportunities simply weren’t available to poor people before the 60s. I bet you a paycheck they never surveyed HBCUs in the 60s in the south where attendance was by people trying to deal with and escape the limitations of the Jim Crow south.

And the entire purpose of the GI bill was retraining so that ex military could get a job.

And even then the survey was skewed because an entire class of people who would have gone to college to get a job were excluded

https://www.npr.org/2022/10/18/1129735948/black-vets-were-ex...

Of course if you exclude people who need college to get a job from going to college in the first place and then there is a big influx of people going to college to open of doors, you’re going to get more people saying they see college as a way to have a better life.

They aren’t going to get a Journalism degree and then do unpaid internships to “pursue their passions”
Considering how much they trust their LLMs, why don't they just run o1-pro to make a summary of the responses given in the feedback
I'd love to see this comparison between Garmin and Oura. I ditched Whoop because it was too easy to get 100 sleep scores, but my Garmin watch is much harder to please. I do think it offers better signal, but I've never scored over a 90, so maybe it is too critical?
Maybe it will out perform their fund too lol
That register could be a Model-Specific Register; I haven't looked at it closely enough to see what it does. The Pentium is very complicated with 3.1 million transistors, so my reverse-engineering of it is essentially bits and pieces here and there.
> I think I'd save the stuff about murdering and mutilating concubines until you're comfortable with them watching R-rated movies.

Really? Do you feel the same way about Bluebeard? Cinderella? This isn't a rare motif in children's stories.