skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Congrats on the launch!

Noob question - from my understanding, SoTA proprietary models already provide APIs for fine tuning, I'd say it's only a matter of time before they provide RL based APIs, no?
This is such crap. It's just like the Replit CEO saying that software engineering is dead, or Altman saying AGI is imminent. They're stating a version of the future that they would like to appear because that would be the best outcome for their businesses.

But in reality movie theatres are in no way dead. People like the experience of going to a theater with friends, buying yummy snacks, watching a giant screen with really high volume. Seeing the interstellar relaunch last winter reminded me of just how LOUD the movie is, that's something you just can't get with 99% of setups people watch movies on at home.
JEP draft: Prepare to make final mean final
>> He never said why it's bad, just that players he thinks suck should continue to suck and he doesn't like that they don't suck anymore.

Bad players should continue to suck unless they put in the effort to be better. If you're a batter and can't hit the ball with the right part of the bat (especially experienced guys like Chilsolm) you're simply bad at your job. This is like getting a crappy NBA player and putting some Flubber on his shoes[1]. In all sport the tools are going to push performance a certain amount of but this feels beyond the limit for me.

[1] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119137/
I’m sorry but I don’t get this Zed Shaw reference, what did I miss?
That’s fair! It has been mentioned before so we‘ll likely build that into the platform. Would you like us to upload your model to your huggingface account, download the weights or choose an inference provider we then upload it to?
Wait, so she's in prison of embezzlement? Are people claiming this is a fake charge, or are they saying that it's ok with them?
I'm not trying to explain why Unix sockets are great and TCP isn't... I'm trying to solve a real-world problem along a similar vein myself. FWIW, I agree that you should use Unix sockets for local-machine access - you can't accidentally expose them off the box like you can a TCP socket. But that's neither here nor there.

You seem to be misunderstanding the scenario I'm describing: I have a daemon that runs in a privileged context (as root.) I have a client that connects to the daemon, as any user on the box. The client cannot be run as root because the user does not have permission to do so.

I want to ensure that only my client can connect to the daemon. I can't use user/group permissions, because I don't care what user/group has access. I want to make sure a specific process (or a specific binary/executable) has access. To quote the comment I initially responded to:

> it's equally true that you could lock down a TCP socket to a specific process with about the same amount of work.

On a Unix machine, this is often done by creating a group to use for access (e.g. a docker group.) This works to lock down a TCP socket to a specific group but not to a specific process. Using shared secrets stored elsewhere on the box also doesn't help here, since any other process could access those secrets.

The best I know of is using something like XPC on macOS, using SO_GETPEERCRED and checksum'ing the pid out of /proc/<pid>/exe, or perhaps using some other platform-specific code signing API.

I was excited to hear that it was easy. I'm disappointed now.
We'll see if the analogy holds. Every team has the ability to use bats like this.

If no other team sees an advantage from using torpedo bats, it would be a lot like the brotherly shove.

But first we'll have to see if this is a passing fad. In baseball, pitchers evolve pretty quickly and usually lead the batter-pitcher arms race.

I'm guessing it spread pretty quickly through the league and be used by a minority of hitters, and the advantage will flatten out. So a .210 hitter may hit .230. That is a big difference no doubt, but compare the game to when leading batters were hitting .330.
Looks like that's a frontend for https://discountdb.ch/ which is basically a https://www.retailmenot.com/ that nobody seems to use.
retailmenot, etc. There's some pretty dubious ones that come up in search results, e.g. try searching "levis.com coupon codes" or something.
Avoiding UB for performing the signed addition/subtraction/multiplication is trivial - just cast to unsigned, do the operation, cast back. In standard C23 or GNU C11, you can write a `make_unsigned` and `make_signed` macro using `typeof` and `_Generic`.
> I can't find that bit in the article and I haven't heard it before: could you share some more?

> The Autorité also found that the rules governing the interaction between the different pop-up windows displayed undermined the neutrality of the framework, causing definite economic harm to application publishers and advertising service providers.

https://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/en/press-release/targ...

“Economic harm to … advertising service providers” says it implicitly.
Of this in particular? Except that absolutely everybody in the system knows, not really.

But there are plenty of studies that point out that foster care, any form, is on average worse than facing abuse at home. Group homes are FAR worse than abuse at home. A huge one is here:

https://nccpr.org/the-evidence-is-in-foster-care-vs-keeping-...

The implication of this is, of course, doing nothing about abuse at all is superior to the current CPS system. This should NOT be understood as "child abuse doesn't matter". No. It has strong negative effects on children. However, CPS has strongER negative effects on children.
The optimization is still valid under -fwrapv semantics. To see this, observe the invariant (0 <= i && i < count) when entering the loop body, and (i==0 || (0 < i && i <= count)) when doing the loop test -- in particular, 0<=i<INT_MAX when entering the loop body (since count <= INT_MAX), so wraparound cannot occur.
Off-topic, but here it goes since you put the links:

Man, I love and use Debian, but the thing I hate the most about it are these ancient email-based bug-reporting systems and package trackers, like the ones linked in your message. This shit is ancient, and horrible. Some time ago I reported a Debian bug using a HOWTO (what other distro requires a HOWTO in order to report a bug?) and absolutely lost track of it after my report was submitted: I could just never find my report again. I just gave up reporting Debian bugs. These ancient systems are definitely barring me from making contributions to the Debian project.
> There's 3 reasonable choices for what to do with unsigned overflow: wraparound, saturation, and trapping.

There's a 4th reasonable choice: pretend it doesn't happen. Now, before you crucify me for daring to suggest that undefined behavior can be a good thing, let me explain:

When you start working on a lot of peephole optimizations, you quickly come to the discovery that there are quite a few cases where two pieces of code are almost equivalent, except that they end up giving different answers if someone overflowed (or some other edge case you don't really care about). Rather interestingly, even if you put a lot of effort into a compiler to make it aggressively infer that code can't overflow, you still run into problems because those assumptions don't really compose well (e.g., knowing that (A + (B + C)) can't overflow doesn't mean that ((A + B) + C) can't overflow--imagine B = INT_MAX and C = INT_MIN to see why).

And sure, individual peephole optimizations don't make much of a performance effect. But they can sometimes have want-of-a-nail side effects, where a failure because of inability to assume nonoverflow in one place causes another optimization to fail to kick in and the domino effect results in measurable slowdowns. In one admittedly extreme example, I've seen a single this-might-overflow result in a 10× slowdown, since it alone was responsible for the autoparallelization framework to fail to kick in. This is happened enough to me that there are times I just want to shake the computer and scream "I DON'T FUCKING CARE ABOUT EDGE CASES, JUST GIVE ME THE DAMN FASTEST CODE."

The problem with undefined behavior isn't that it risks destroying your code if you hit it (that's a good thing!); the problem is that it too frequently comes without a way to opt-out of it. And there is room to argue if it should be opt-in or opt-out, but completely absent is a step too far for me.

(Slight apologies for the rant, I'm currently in the middle of tracking down a performance hit caused by... inability to infer non-overflow of an operation.)
Not opensource per se , but I use ultra human. they are also built on top of Libre cgm , but subscriptions are inexpensive.
> it really freaking hurts and throws off subsequent swings.

Totally ignorant about baseball, but would wearing thick padded gloves help? Do major leaguers build up calluses to help?
Indeed. If they really gave a shit they'd be getting Apple to open up their APIs so we can get data out of Reminders and Notes etc without having to resort to necromancy and hacking...

Apple need one of these https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/
There doesn’t need to be a reason, just random chance from gasses shifting around is sufficient.
> to ensure children are not exposed to harmful content.

Strong claim. I like the idea, but wish they were more realistic about what they can provide. If you ever get a Reddit result you're likely one click away from harmful content.

That said, I like the lenses applied in this case. It may be the best we can get today in terms of search filtering.
I mean that's part of baseball as chess (or poker), right? The batter swaps to the fastball bat, communicating that they expect a fastball. The pitcher knows, from the coach's extensive scouting, and swaps to the curve. But actually, the batter knows he struggles with that kind of fastball and was hoping to bait the curveball, which he's more confident swinging against, and is happy to use a slightly suboptimized bat.
The article mentions a very important decriminalization-agnostic reason why no changes in outcomes were found within their analytic period: treatment took a really, really, really long time to set up, with funding only going out by the time decriminalization was rolled back. There was lack of capacity both in terms of staffing the actual programs, but as well in reviewing the programs.

https://www.opb.org/article/2024/02/14/oregon-drug-decrimina...

Second, M110 funding comes from marijuana taxes, and a significant downturn in funding is anticipated this FY – I don't know the specific numbers, but it's on the magnitude of 25%. This is the context of the article's observations that treatment _still_ is impossible to find.

As a result, I'd argue that Oregon's not going to see many changes in health-related outcomes.
I'm sure there have been bat changes all along the way, and if the Yankees hadn't scored 20 runs that day we wouldn't be reading about this either.
> Story behind the Poop Avatar

I love it
If you have an end-to-end secure transport to the authority, you've factored out several of the attacks (notably: transaction-driven cache poisoning) that have, at times, formed the rationale for deploying DNSSEC. The most obvious example here is Kaminsky's attack, and the txid attacks that preceded it, which had mitigations in non-BIND DNS software but didn't in BIND specifically because DNSSEC was thought to be the proper fix. Those kinds of attacks would be off the table in a universal DOH/DOT/DOQ world, in some of the same sense that they would be if DNS just universally used TCP.

"True" DNS security isn't a term that means anything to me. Posit a world in which DNSSEC deployment is universal, rather than the sub-5% single digit deployment it has today. There are still attacks on the table, most notably from DNS TLD operators themselves. We choose to adopt a specific threat model and then evaluate attacks against it. This is a persistent problem when discussing DNSSEC (esp. vs. things like DOH). because DNSSEC advocates tend to fall back on a rhetorical crutch of what "true" security of authoritative data meant, as if that had some intuitively obvious meaning for operators.

In a world where DNS message transports are all end-to-end secure, there really isn't much of a reason at all to deploy DNSSEC; again: if you're worried about people injecting bogus data to get certificates issued, your real concern should be your registrar account.
I'm actually okay with the Apple Camera app asking me once and the Domino's Pizza app having to ask me twice. Who are the consumers being harmed here?
This is actually a perfect example of how under-served dental needs have been. It was only passed via some interesting political wrangling and alliances. And it hasn’t been a smooth rollout with some dentists not getting on board. Starting with aged seniors is good from a compassion standpoint, but the emphasis should be on prevention at earlier ages.
I wouldn't mind custom _diets_ (of normal food) and custom fabricated swim gear... provided the teams all had access to the same training tools before hand.

Custom drugs seem like a step too far IMO. As far as the suits go that's to level out body shapes as an issue.
Who should the unimaginative non-liberals read, and why?
More uniform most likely. With FreeBSD can google some issue you’re encountering and the solutions you find are likely to be applicable, even with differing hardware, OS version, etc.

With Linux there’s been many times I’ll google some problem and the only solution that turns up is for distro Y which is mostly or entirely irrelevant to distro X that I’m running at the moment. This happens even with the big mainstream distros like Ubuntu and Fedora, but of course it’s worse with more niche ones.
Should be easy with the analytics baseball has and could easily level up everyone making it fair. It would be interesting to see how they judge younger players though as they come through and inevitably can't afford custom bats (or can't afford new ones every time they adjust their mechanics) or don't have the analytics to make them valuable.
How did people think honey was making money?

I think a lot of these YouTubers are pretending to be shocked or caught out.
Why open multimodal medical foundation models will be the future of healthcare
Ok this is excellent. If I can trust Kagi for kids, I would pay through the nose for this.

The internet is wildly useful but it's just filled with so much trash and thanks to google going horribly terribly south, search doesn't work anymore.

Which means kids are no longer able to actually have the joy of surfing the web and finding very interesting things to read.

So the main question that I have is, is there a guarantee that bad sites will not show up here?
anything shelf-stable, hydrogenated peanut butter, highly processed milk, etc

I'm starting to wonder if

convenience = 1/healthy

hopefully not bananas though.
Can we just frikkin ban tracking completely and just see how that goes?

I do not really care if some businesses can no longer make money in the way they like to. I’m sure they’ll figure it out if they have to. Businesses existed for a loooooong time without tracking their customers. I’m sure they can do it again.
Armin Ronacher is Leaving Sentry
I think many people share the same sentiment. We don’t need agents that can kind of do many things. We need reliable programs that are really good at doing a single thing. I said as much about Manus when it came out.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43350950

There are mistakes in the Manus demo if you actually look at it. And with so many AI demos, they never want you to look too closely because the thing that was created is fairly mediocre. No one is asking for the tsunami of sludge except for VCs apparently.
No. Just because a conservative is not willing to support a liberal position, that doesn't make them automatically a fascist. In fact, thats the core of my criticism. Political views are a spectrum, and you can't just push someone to the far right just because you disagree with them. This black-and-white thinking is doing far more harm then you might imagine.
> 433 kcal/mole

For reference, TNT is 1kcal/g. This is 6.2 kcal/g.
This is an embezzlement case. No-one tampered with election results, so can you explain how there is any logic to your argument?
So feeds and labels (moderation) are actually Bluesky primitives and not part of atproto. Which is fine. The core atproto primatives are identity through a DID, auth through OAuth, and commits through a personal data server. Everything is an abstraction on top of that.
True, but with one exception that I saw (Memorial Sloan Kettering), every EMR that isn’t Epic is a steaming pile. And I think MSK is switching.
> I think part of what's been happening here is that the hubris of the AI startups is really showing through.

I think it its somewhat reductive to assign this "hubris" to "AI startups". I would posit that this hubris is more akin to the superiority we feel as human beings.

I have heard people say several times that they "treat AI like a Jr. employee", I think that within the context of a project AI should be treated based on the level if contribution. If AI is the expert, I am not going to approach it as if I am an SME that knows exactly what to ask. I am going to try and focus on the thing. know best, and ask questions around that to discover and learn the best approach. Obviously there is nuance here that is outside the scope of this discussion, but these two fundamentally different approaches have yield materially different outcomes in my experience.
Vibe coding is functionally equivalent to drunken coding. It all seems to make sense ... until next morning when you try to run it.
That’s air golf at that point
I can't scroll on Firefox mobile, moves and anything below are not visible. I can't tell if I have limited moves (if so, would prefer an option to get unlimited) or if it's just counting my moves.

I wish I could kill the sound.

Otherwise, everything seems to work.
MIT 6.S191: Reinforcement Learning [video]
This is one of the most promising uses of LLMs that I have found in my own work. Many times I have an idea for a refactor or even a feature but I have this mental reluctance just due to the amount of code I would have to write. Like, I have this counter in my head on the number of key-strokes it will take to write a wrapper object in several places, and I hesitate.

Just being able to tell an LLM "rewrite all of this code using this new pattern" and then dozens of code sites are correctly updated is a huge help. It makes me consider bigger refactoring or minor features that I might normally skip because I am lazy.
Gene therapy alleviates Dravet syndrome symptoms in mice without side effects
My own functional programming language. I'd done an imperative before but wanted one that has pattern matching, would let me do currying _and_ uses a bidirectional type-checker. All of this is currently implemented but not for all type constructs. It's name? Marmelade. Because Lady Marmelade and thus files with a lady suffix. m.lady.

https://github.com/pandemonium/marmelade
Why would this be preferred over creating a new HTML element, like <options>?
+1 for Eaglercraft. It's based on the open source TeaVM project ( https://teavm.org/ ), which transpiles Java to JS or WASM to run efficiently in modern browsers. With numerous shipped production Java-in-the-browser projects, TeaVM is my preferred option for Java in the browser thanks to its performance, build speed, and Apache license.
Mine is running, in no particular order:

* UrBackup for all of the host systems in the home to backup to

* Plex for home movies

* HomeAssistant

* OpenThread Border Router

* Zigbee2MQTT

* Matter Server

* PostgreSQL (for HA)

* InfluxDB (for long term statistics from HA)

* EMHASS (linear optimizer to maximise profit on my Solar PV + Battery system)

* Minecraft server for the kids

* Mosquitto MQTT broker

* TeslaMate for car data

In my case, the heaviest use is HomeAssistant - every light in the house has smarts, either directly, or through smart relays. Telling my energy provider how much charge to add to the EV's so they schedule it and I only pay 7p per kWh during the dispatching windows. Managing energy flow in the house (charge battery? discharge battery? only charge battery from solar that would otherwise be curtailed due to a 5kW export limit) etc. etc.

It's running in a short depth 2U rackmount chassis inside my network rack, with 6 4TB drives running in RaidZ2 and offsite backups which are aided by a 1Gbps symmetric FTTP connection.
Have they been using them in spring training? That's still early but a much better sample size if so.
The codes are probably legit. There's just no incentive for anyone to clean up dead codes nor submit fresh ones except for the coupon providers themselves who might see retailmenot as a marketing angle, which seems to be very few.
I got a weird feeling from the MegaLag video, but overall don't think Honey are entirely in the clear either. From the AMA it seems Honey has been in the business of taking some/all affiliate revenue even in cases where it finds no coupons - sounds like the sites are fine/happy with this, but I'm sure people who post affiliate links are not.
They used the money on the election campaign.
Someone attached to Oregon here – it isn't, and it's even harder to retain people at current pay grades in state corrections medical. (Let alone public defense, which the article mentions means that people are being let go in many counties before non-drug-related charges are tried.)

https://oregoncapitalchronicle.com/2025/02/03/amid-mounting-...
The first amendment is about freedom of speech, not about criticising either the US or Israeli government. I don't believe that one can agree to waiver their constitutional rights so I'm not sure those visa conditions would be legal.
Yeah. I could've worded it better. By "ejections" I meant how, when two planets/moon sized masses collide, rocks shoot out into space. But because black holes have so much gravitational pull, everything theoretically just falls in.
AI/Math Puzzle
This is not so much what matters. A child is fundamentally a learning system. How do you screw up a learning system? You dole out punishments and rewards based on things the learning system has no influence over. Good behavior randomly leads to rewards or punishment. Bad behavior randomly leads to reward or punishment. Random from the perspective of the child (obviously no other perspective matters for the child's development)

A fundamental property of any agency is that better or worse circumstances depend on availability ONLY. Availability of everything. Budget most of all, of course, but availability of "in-network" foster families, availability of foster parents determines if you get stuck in a group home or not. Whether you stay near your school. Group home availability determines if you get stuck in a short term group home or elsewhere (and thus have to move every 2 weeks for years). Occasionally foster kids are held literally in prison.

The reasons can be as valid or idiotic as you want, if they're not predictable AND under the influence of the child it will have disastrous effects on the psyche of the child.

And, frankly, this is rational: why should a foster child care about a society where an agency rips it out of it's family but doesn't provide a better alternative? What exactly do you expect to happen when that is done?

The only way CPS could theoretically function well is with 20%, 30% spare capacity that deliberately goes unused (which is the normal situation in families I might add. Parents aren't down to their last dollar. Parents aren't overloaded with kids. Even a drunkard dad is predictable, and if you can avoid them at the correct times ... Even an addict mom is predictable)
I hope you weren’t also using the key above then…
But what does it do? The landing page is very rough and gives me no idea why I should entrust it with my OpenAI API key