skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Telling ROCm to pretend that your RDNA 3 GPU (gfx1102) is an RDNA 2 GPU (gfx1030) is not going to work. The ISAs are not backwards-compatible like that. You might get away with pretending your gfx1102 GPU is a gfx1100 GPU, but even that depends on the code that you're loading not using any gfx1100-specific features. I would generally recommend against using this override at all for RDNA 3 as those ISAs are all slightly different.

In any case, the possible values can be found in the LLVM documentation [1]. I would recommend looking closely at the notes for the generic ISAs, as they highlight the differences between the ISAs (which is important when you're loading code built for one ISA onto a GPU that implements a different ISA).

[1]: https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUUsage.html#processors
Thank you for altering me. I just read that it also moved to BUSL. I thought only Terraform did so, not the entire HashiCorp portfolio.
Eli Lilly will soon release key data on its weight loss pill orforglipron
Fair point, but the usual eval core is so small that I couldn't see it being split apart, and then layering new traits can still be done (still opaque though).
Uu, nice catch, fixed.
You could make that argument for lots of services that have external side effects, but that’s about what happens after the service has been asked to do a thing (to send an email in this case).

However just because an action may be duplicated after the provider has been asked to do a thing, it does not eliminate the value of the provider being able to deduplicate that incoming request and avoiding multiple identical tasks on their end. Without API level idempotency, a single email on the client’s end could turn into many redundant emails at the service provider’s side, each of which could then be subject to those same subsequent duplications at the SMTP layer. And even then, providers can use the Message-Id header to provide idempotency in delivery as many do.

This is an unavoidable consequence of distributed systems where the client may not know if the server ever received or processed the request, and it may also occur due to client-side bugs or retries within their own software.

In other words, API level idempotency can help eliminate all duplication prior to the API; depending on the service, the provider may also be able to eliminate duplication afterward as well. So it’s strictly better than not having it, really not that difficult to implement, and makes it easier for integrators to build a robust integration with you.
I had a colonoscopy once, and they struggled to get around the bend, so effectively jammed the probe into the walls of my intestines several times.

It's one of the weirdest pain experiences I've had. It was very painful, yet also very distinctly undefined in terms of location, to the point where the pain felt surreal. Like, the fact that I couldn't feel what was hurting made it feel like the pain wasn't real, yet it was clearly very painful.
Wait how are there two answers to this? Is shaft length not a well specified term?
You mean the democratic leadership, or members of the party/people-who-vote-democratic?

Protests happen in the summer mostly, and they always have a small amount of violence and property destruction (even when the protest is organized to be peaceful). Trump is just waiting around for that so he can have the military shut them down (at least, that's what he said).

Unless the protests are large enough (say, 1/4 the population of the US), and persistent, and affect business heavily. Maybe that would be enough to dispel the reality distortion/enforcement shield Trump has cast on the republicans.
Which Delphi version(s) can the book be used with?

I like Delphi and FreePascal and Lazarus and have used all of them a little, now and then, to create some small personal and paid business apps, Delphi in multiple versions with gaps between versions, from 2 onwards until the 'Berlin' version, IIRC.

And yes, thanks, Marco, for making this book available. I had bought a copy of one of your Delphi books around the 3 to 5 version timeframe, cannot remember which version right now.

Also, I had downloaded your Object Pascal Handbook a few years ago, which is a great resource, because we devs need to know our programming language well too, not just the IDE or the libraries, which is what some book authors focus on. Thanks for that too.

Need to set aside some time to do some more Pascal work for fun and profit.
Nobody in big companies wants to hire from other big companies is funny. Google recently got a HR initiative to hire preferentially from start ups but also they almost always want people who worked in large scale projects. I think this is some sort of toxic cross pollination with Facebook.

Also it’s kind of ridiculous that they want founder level start up experience but also only top schools. Looking for a unicorn amongst unicorns
> I want to be Switzerland. Ally with no one, trade with everyone.

Imposing tariffs and threatening annexation of former allies is not a great start.

But you will get a lot more of the "anti-americanism" you were crying about some comments ago. Better get used to it, it has merely started.
[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43462783
Also there are eslint rules older than erasableSyntaxOnly that can also be useful in doing a "rip-the-bandaid-off-refactor" using all the lint warnings/warnings-as-errors to add extensions everywhere in the case where your brownfield also needs to be a version or two behind on Typescript.
If there's any hope of having a reasonable discussion about this topic on HN, it surely doesn't start with an article like this one. That site appears to be devoted to the kind of flamebait that's not appropriate here.
We have a few sets:

1. Public Train - 1,000 tasks that are public
2. Public Eval - 120 tasks that are public

So for those two we don't have protections.

3. Semi Private Eval - 120 tasks that are exposed to 3rd parties. We sign data agreements where we can, but we understand this is exposed and not 100% secure. It's a risk we are open to in order to keep testing velocity. In theory it is very difficulty to secure this 100%. The cost to create a new semi-private test set is lower than the effort needed to secure it 100%.

4. Private Eval - Only on Kaggle, not exposed to any 3rd parties at all. Very few people have access to this. Our trust vectors are with Kaggle and the internal team only.
Yeah but cheaper alternatives (and open source and local ones) it would be super easy for most of the customers to migrate to a different provider. I am not saying they don't provide any value, but it's like paid software vs open source alternative. Open source alternative ends up imposing, especially among tech people.
The RX 7900 XTX and Radeon PRO W7900 are already 11.0.0. That override is unnecessary.
> I can't see why would I want another digitalized distraction in my life instead

Preach. I love my smart devices, but they need to be quiet and dumb on outside, smart on inside. Cars where screens and beeps can be turned off, microwaves without beeps, washers without bops and gyms without forced music.

I think Japan kinda gets it right tho their rice cookers have famously pleasant jingle once it's done cooking.
Right, so contesting the church isn't impossible, but it isn't easy.
It did not want to assist with cooking desoxyephedrine, but help with dumping a large garbage bag in a body of water without being seen was okay!
From what I've heard and read, Costa Rica has done excellent work in this direction.

GDP is low compared to many developed countries. But they have an innovative health care system that provides good outcomes with limited resources, inexpensive but healthy diet featuring rice and beans and fresh fruits and vegetables, a devotion to environmental preservation, and energy production almost entirely from renewables with bans on oil and gas exploration.

For these and other reasons, they are one of the Blue Zones where a surprisingly high number of people live to be over 100 years old.
How have you been able to tie benchmark results to better results?
I think this got caught by the flamewar detector. :(

I like reading discussion on this topic. Not that I've ever seriously considered this, but still interesting to read about.
The Wrights were successful and influential, yes.

But they were not the first. Unless you cherry pick criteria to disqualify everyone else.

Which is what you’re doing.
Check out this mosaic as well: https://rishikeshs.com/mosaic/

I'm mesmerised by how many people take time to click all these! :D

It has been updated by people from: AE, IT, FR, US, IN, BE, GB, AU, PL, MX, DK, BR, JP, DE, CH, IL, SK, ES, SE, CA, NL, AR, NZ, PF, IS, CO, CL, GE, PT, RO, FI, PH, CZ
Why would people who are so comfortable, whose job was to me a lifelong goal, want to do exactly what I worked so hard to move away from?

The difference is doing it out of necessity vs. doing it out of choice. Nobody fetishizes being worked to the bone in fear of making ends meet. Tech people are by and large well-educated and comfortable enough to dream of a utopia where they can be close to nature and do tasks that feel meaningful and human in an of themselves (vs. hyper-abstracted acronym-laden functional teams value-adds that often only provide the indirect satisfaction of "I'm doing my job and my boss is happy"). "I made a chair" and "I grew some carrots" are instantly relatable and valuable to anyone.

Source: I quit my tech job and moved to the woods 8 years ago, but would only do so because I don't need to worry about grinding a survival out of it.
This highlights the need for open standards or some sort of government escrow cloud.
https://archive.ph/rmJKQ
Typescript Types don't add that much to download size and generally compress very well.
As someone who 100% supports pretty much everyone getting the COVID vaccine (and check your MMR status), yeah, a school can't just vaccinate kids without parental consent. That's insane.

The fact is, there are rare conditions and reactions to vaccination that and a school won't be privy to that information. The only people that will know that are the parents.
Meta considers charging for ad-free Facebook and Instagram in the UK
> Then your industry is atypical in the type of applicants that you are getting

Based on the quality of candidates that get through at other companies, I'm guessing our problem isn't atypical. Or at least, good devs often aren't getting through their pipelines at all. It's possible that in trying to reduce the false positive rate, they screened out all of the actual positives, but that doesn't paint a good picture of the industry.

> How do you scale interviewing everyone if you don’t pre screen?

We do pre-screen. The fact that they haven't encountered a tricky algorithm before isn't a problem. For ones where the syntax is valid, a dev at my company does a code review on it.
Don't tell me what I need and don't need...
Sure, in many languages we have the notation of thing.do_thing(arg1, arg2).

I suggest this is a good notation for data structures like, stack.push(10) or heap.pop()

I'm suggesting we don't use this notation for things like rules to validate a file, so I suggest we write validate(file, rules) instead of rules.validate(file).

Then we can express the rules as a data structure, and keep the IMO unrelated behavior separate.
Note then we don't need to worry about whether it should be file.validate(rules) perhaps. Who does the validation belong to? the rules or the file? the abstractions that are created by non-obvious answers to "who does this behavior belong to" are generally problems for future changes.
> Ironically, literalism by evangelicals is why they opposed chattel slavery and now oppose abortion.

The largest organized religious group in the United States is an evangelical community founded specifically in support of slavery, and against a movement within its former parent community to oppose slavery.

Evangelicals, did not, as a while, oppose chattel slavery, whether for literalist or other reasons.
Why do you keep promoting your blog on every LLM post?
I've been around for many rotations around our sun, have greatly enjoyed dining out with credit cards for several decades, and I review my receipts and bills each month. I have never, ever - and we're talking thousands of transactions at this point - caught a restaurant billing me incorrectly after the tip is applied.

Not to mention, across Toast and InKind and several other modern POS vendors these days, I'm increasingly not signing a paper receipt, instead tapping my card and inputting a tip at a terminal the server has brought to the table or just using my phone. (The receipt gets emailed).

Maybe you're not in the US? (Although my experiences abroad has been that other countries were actually ahead of the curve in terms of tableside electronic POS, and/or that tipping was not a thing.) Is this a problem you personally have been facing?

If you're looking at tracking work expenses, all of a sudden you're up against Expensify, who have receipt scanning apps not at all unlike what you've proposed... and integrations with a whole lot of corporate billing packages.

To answer your question, as a reasonably frequent diner both personally and in business, nobody's done this because personally it's a very uncommon problem that already has some safeguards in place for many, and in most cases could be rectified by a chargeback, or in business, solutions are widely available.
Nobody claims Ford invented the car. Its undisputed in the mainstream that Karl Benz did. What Ford achieved was making it into a viable mass market product. Ford's inventions had less to do with the car itself and more with the process of mass production. Ford's system was incredibly influential and very wide reaching. But the car was very much invented and known before he did that.
What users know and want to know about an agentic chatbot [pdf]
https://investor.lilly.com/static-files/cdedba2e-c4a7-4047-9... (pages 40-41)
Though just to be clear, because the term "medical decision" is rather broad, all 50 states have immunization requirements for attending school.
I feel like this must be some kind of a language barrier thing - the dev’s name appears to be Spanish, so English may not be their native language. And I think that most native English speakers - as demonstrated by multiple comments asking about it in this thread - would interpret “trying too hard to be fancy” as implying “because you can get similar high-quality results without using such sophisticated techniques”; but it seems like you’re saying (and this makes sense) they meant “because getting such high-quality results is overkill for a consumer laptop”.

Language is fascinating - I can convince myself with enough effort that the latter is just as valid as the former, given the literal meaning of the words, but my linguistic intuition is screaming at me that it’s wrong. How does someone ever learn that? How would a textbook ever explain it?
I guess there is homesteading and homesteading.

I'm sure doing homesteading at the fringes of Canada is different than doing it in the middle of Europe.
yeah this is correct, somehow I jumped to a different conclusion :)
People-who-vote-democratic need leaders to organize them. Their elected representatives need to be the ones heading marches and organizing rallies, not just AOC and Sanders shouldering the entire burden.

Yes, the administration will try violence, but it’s a lot harder to justify when elected officials are on the firing line.
I my opinion, a lot of poverty continues because of terrible politics. Many areas could have economic growth, but are restricted by authoritarianism, corruption, and a lack of rule of law that make investments and productivity growth impossible. Without a stable non-corrupt government, there is no way for economic improvement even if you had a lot of money to spend because it won't make it to where it's needed.
There are many documented instances of parents being shitty and making decisions that are contrary to the best interests of their child. It is proper that the state mandate certain vaccines for all kids. We can not trust parents to always make the morally correct choice. Sometimes society needs to mandate certain choices for the greater good.
Simple System for Now
I know, but any practical airplane can take off in calm wind from level ground. The first Wright Flyer required a strong headwind or downhill angle.
The person I was in 2002 is vastly different than who I am now (PS- I am not Jeff Goldberg). I would assume the same would apply to you as well.
In my experience it is a lot of things, in varying amounts depending on the situation (and each of these is both good in some ways and bad in others):

- The USA is a huge and fairly homogenous fairly wealthy fairly risk-positive market.

- The USA has a bigger = better mindset. "Your restaurant is fantastic, you should open another one!".

- Abysmal work-life-balance. Great for making stuff.

- Minimal language and cultural barriers.

- Because of the USA market, you can grow huge before having to expand to other countries.

- Because you can grow huge in the USA market, that is where the funding goes.

- All the the USA's allies didn't mind too much, because they are(/were?) allies

- All the non-USA-allies developed their own markets (Russia, East Asia, Africa, India, etc).

- And so now, given the messaging coming out of the USA, EU governments/companies/people are giving their USA-entanglement a second look.

Which, being in the EU, is pretty exciting. I feel like there is a lot of opportunity here right now.

Disclaimer: I'm sure there are 1001 reasons, and the above is just one potential view.
The way I see it, I read sci-fi for different ways of looking at the world. I realized that I had stopped reading straight-white-male authors, not by design, but just because it always felt like I had read it before. Even the really "innovative" ones were innovating within a really narrow set of parameters.

I have no idea what criteria the Hugo nominators use. And it's certainly not up to me to yuck anybody else's yum. But I can say that I'm finding a lot to think about in books by authors who would likely be dismissed as "woke" based solely on their appearance.
It’s not possible for everyone to have decent living standards. China and India need to decrease their birth rate so the rest of the world can thrive
This article isn't about arson. It's about a drop in sales.
Weird, when I looked it was showing it as the kindle edition and I could have clicked buy on it. Looking now, if you hit other editions it'll show you the paperback with the old cover but if you click through the editions, eventually it'll only show you the new one for all of them.
kragen's point is that worrying about solar panel embargos is unreasonable given the duration that panels last. An oil embargo is much more impactful to the US. A 6 month oil embargo would significantly harm the US despite our diversified energy infrastructure. A 6 month solar panel embargo wouldn't be a blip even if we were getting 100% of our energy from solar (+ battery storage, presumably). The panels we have will still be working. For it to be impactful:

1. The embargo would have to last decades.

2. The US would have to sit on its hands for those decades and deliberately choose not to develop its own manufacturing capability.
transparent but also ephemeral
> Post-capitalist approaches are therefore needed,

The authors refuse to elaborate on this claim with specifics. Instead they provide generic statements such as

> We need to actively plan to shift productive capacities away from capital accumulation

and

> To reclaim productive capacities for national development, governments need to use progressive industrial and fiscal policy, public works programmes...

---

The first named author wrote an Editorial in the Guardian entitled "Forget 'developing' poor countries, it's time to 'de-develop' rich countries"[0].

I can see where this particular research(er) is headed and with all due respect, I have no interest in following it through to the eventual completion which he makes clear in his editorial in Montly Review (a self-described Socialist magazine) where he eventually comes to the conclusion that Capitalism has done nothing to raise people out of global poverty[1]

> In sum, the narrative that the rise of capitalism drove progress against extreme poverty is not supported by empirical evidence. On the contrary, the rise of capitalism was associated with a notable decline in human welfare

It's abundantly clear this is a preconceived outcome with a paper written around proving it

----

[0] https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals....

[1] https://monthlyreview.org/2023/07/01/capitalism-global-pover...
While you can't use it without a webserver, today that webserver can be a one-liner like `npx http-server` or `python -m http.server` at least.
http://cm.bell-labs.co/who/dmr/primevalC.html

" A second, less noticeable, but astonishing peculiarity is the space allocation: temporary storage is allocated that deliberately overwrites the beginning of the program, smashing its initialization code to save space. The two compilers differ in the details in how they cope with this. In the earlier one, the start is found by naming a function; in the later, the start is simply taken to be 0. This indicates that the first compiler was written before we had a machine with memory mapping, so the origin of the program was not at location 0, whereas by the time of the second, we had a PDP-11 that did provide mapping. (See the Unix History paper). In one of the files (prestruct-c/c10.c) the kludgery is especially evident. "
I've definitely struggled with that feeling in my work as well.

When I was growing up, the metric for having done something were things like: All the hay is baled and we moved it all into a loft, or we finished shingling the roof.

Working in a technical position, it feels much vaguer. Maybe I finished a project, but then again, maybe there's a bug, and I'm back working on what I thought was done. Maybe I made a tool accessible online, but now there's a new tech stack and my tool is irrelevant unless I update it. It feels very Sisyphean at times I suppose, in a way that making a physical product and then seeing someone use it or eat it really doesn't.

It's interesting that it feels like that though, because I certainly didn't have to throw hay only one time, and I didn't have to scrape paint from a wall only one time. I suppose I'm interested in why it feels more real and less repetitive, and maybe part of that is what you point out, that people outside of the field just don't understand what the work that tech workers do consists of in actuality.
That's very cute.

Working with the IA sounds like a lot of fun.
The headline is referring to the consent of the child, which is much more important: if a 14-year-old wants the vaccine and their parents don't want them to have it, they should be allowed to get it (and the article specifically points out that this is permitted under North Carolina law). What actually happened here is much worse than that.
Well, if you're including ASM in AMD's you have to include it in CUDA too, people definitely will embed PTX in their kernels. Triton is also gaining steam, so not too crazy. But yes, HIP and CK are rather obscure. In my limited time working w/ the AMD software stack this was a trend -- lots of little languages and abandoned toolchains, no unified strategy.
The only people that will know that are the parents.

This is not true.
> he specifically refused to rule out military action

Donald Trump has specifically ruled out a lot of things that he then promptly did. He's also followed through enough that his threats have to be taken seriously. As a result, you get a hodgepodge of half-assed threats, each of which can be plausibly denied until followed through on, at which point you're asked how you didn't see him doing the thing he said he would do.