skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nah, this is definitely still solvable. Specifically looking at housing for example, I believe Austin and Minneapolis have seen some good progress.

Your rhetoric sounds like the doomerism I constantly heard around 2009 during the great recession, ala "THIS time capitalism's done for good! No coming back from this one!" And then after a few years things largely went back to normal and the doomers pretended they'd never made any predictions, that would require them to actually introspect, you see.
Town to City
The Republicans care to claim about costs, but DOGE actions like mass firing inspectors general make it obvious that's a lie. The actual function of the party at this this point is to funnel money to the rich and/or do whatever Trump got into his head is important this week even if it means setting the economy on fire.
I'm not sure if democracy has the tools to adequately deal with this tbh, at-least in the short-to-medium term.

I really hope we can find a way to make voters actually believe an abundant future is possible, and that it'll benefit them and their families.

It's the biggest difference I see in societies like China, there's this pervasive optimism about technology, progress and abundance (~700 million people have first hand experience). No idea if they can keep up the growth but we sure won't.
If you can figure out how to account for the dietary preferences and allergies for the entire student populace for $10 a day I'd call you crazy.

That's why we have multiple lunch lines, why they can say "no" to certain things, and why they can bring bagged lunches.
Destination Yemen I suppose.
Blame HN for having systems, rules, and filters to prevent long comment threads between two people. It's probably for the best as HN doesn't have the best interface for "two people chat back and forth for three days" but even if it isn't the optimum system, we as commenters are utterly powerless to change it.
That's seems silly, it's not poisonous to talk about next token prediction if 90% of the training compute is still spent on training via next token prediction (as far as I am aware)
Common? No idea.

I witnessed someone paralyzed from cervical radiculopathy in the neck caused by youthful horseplay. Full recovery within a month. Scared us all when he went limp.
I've never used this provider, and while I do think you're right that the provider probably shouldn't change the attribute on you, the docs for the `docker_container` resource[1] suggest populating the `image` argument with the `image_id` attribute of a `docker_image` resource[2].

This should give you a location to stick in the friendly name of a container that won't get clobbered by the provider.

I do like the explanation you provided though, because this is the kind of puzzle you can't really solve with Terraform until you've run into it. I've never used the `replace_triggered_by` feature.

[1]: https://registry.terraform.io/providers/kreuzwerker/docker/l...

[2]: I was originally expecting `docker_image` to be a data source, but the resource seems to be the recommended method for this, and I didn't wrap my brain around the differences between the data source and the resource before writing.
I thought TFA was saying something important, but after reading it, it seems meaningless.
In the article, it describes an internal state of the model that is preserved between lines ("rabbit"), and how the model combines parallel calculations to arrive at a single answer (the math problem)

People output one token (word) at a time when talking. Does that mean people can only think one word in advance?
>I found assisted living significantly more expensive vs. paying a care agency to have someone live at home in the United States.

It really depends on the level of care necessary.

>Talking to the assisted living facility, it sounded like most of their residents were using insurance.

A lot of them don't really take insurance, but they will encourage the residents to spend all their money and then get on Medicaid/Medicare to have the government pay for everything. There is private nursing home insurance but most people don't have it because it's ungodly expensive, especially when purchased when you're already fairly old.
They sort of care about costs, but basically in the sense of, "getting a fat guy to lose weight by chopping his arm off".
> Also her gender and skin color likely worked against her.

She had less charisma than Hilary. Probably even less than Al Gore or Zuckeberg before his new software update was installed. And she had a history of bending the knee to the progressives.
wow that was fast—some gems in there
In the sense that the center is where the action is, and votes are, and the left and right fringes attract too much attention and influence.
fwiw Google search works well for this, but it means "Accessory Dwelling Unit", aka "Granny flat".
See https://www.cityofithaca.org/786/Accessory-Dwelling-Units-AD... and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_suite
The further away the microphone, the better acoustics and less ambient noise you'll need.
We spend about $22,000 a year per student in California. A lot of it is wasted on well meaning but ineffective policy. I think we can afford real meat.
:D thank you!!
I too have been on Mac for over 20 yrs, but day-jobs are sometimes on Windows. Currently I work in Ubuntu under Windows on a Lenovo X1 Carbon. I feel the same about moving away from Mac. Apple's hardware planned obsolescence/deprecation schedule would have been reasonable during the Moore's Law era, but it feels too fast now, so I'm looking at migrating to Linux on Framework laptops. I don't play games much anymore so don't really need Windows.

Linux is fine, it's similar enough to macOS (and Windows, for that matter). For my tastes, all the OSes require some tweaking and compromise. I don't understand the fascination with tiling window mgmt, and disable it everywhere (was surprised it got added to macOS Sequoia). I love having different wallpapers on virtual desktops. Etc etc, there are all sorts of different setup options are available on one platform but not another.

It turns out that my stumbling block is the trackpad and keyboard -- I know this issue is highly specific to each individual, so you may not care about this. I haven't tried them on a Framework laptop but they're both horrible IMO on the Thinkpad. (Other people tell me that I'm crazy and they love the keyboard, so YMMV.) The trackpad feels like plastic crap and responsiveness is subpar. Causing a right-click by pressing slightly right of center is annoying. The page up/down keys in the inverted-T pad get in the way. Even on Mac, I didn't like the era of full size left-right arrows, and bought a couple spare old Mac keyboards that don't have those keys. Thankfully Apple fixed that in more recent designs.

Since I code all day, I'm constantly using the key sequences for copy/paste and search/replace. Maybe with time you can switch your muscle memory for these things, but I think it's simple to do these things on a Mac keyboard and not quite as easy (e.g. ctrl/shift-insert) on Linux/Windows.

However, the issues that you'd run into are most likely going to be different than the ones I did. You're probably just going to have to try it and find out if you like it or not.
You make good points, but if we really perceived reality differently than cameras, someone would write an article about that - after all you can take a photo on your smartphone and compare to your IRL view. Yes it's hard to make it match but it's possible. Since no one made an experiment to show this, and since we understand pretty well the optics of a human eye, I think the cameras actually reproduce human vision decently. The aspect of a psychological bias and filling stuff in perhaps distorts in each possible way, so the camera shows the average human perception.
I think MCP is a layer higher than grpc. MCP can be implemented on gRPC

Mcp is definitely not stateless.
It’s explicitly stateful…

See the 2nd bullet where it says “stateful connections” [1]

And I was saying that with OpenAPI, you need a client per API, or at least a series of http api calls.

1. https://spec.modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-03-2...
"Didn't even win the democratic primary" might be a bit of a misnomer if it's implying that winning the democratic primary should be much easier than winning the general. Bernie has positions that are popular outside of democrats, many people think that if he had won the primary, he would have had a much better chance of winning than Hilary or Biden, since he had less baggage and his policies were broadly popular.
Precisely my observation
You create an “arm’s length” Canadian subsidiary that then licences the software to you.

The Canadian government also heavily subsidises this. Smart of them to do so.
GH made repo read-only after a member was added to the organization who happened to visit Cuba for a short while. No response from GitHub.
I can not follow the linked article at all. It keeps whiplashing back and forth between "big government good" and "big government bad".

The summary, the best I can tell, is "big government bad, that's why we need to empower big government even more, so that it has the power to fix the things that big government did"?

We gave control over housing to big government, which did things the author doesn't like, so now the author wants to give them more power to fix the things they did when we gave them more power?

I have no idea what the author is trying to say. It almost gives the AI content feeling, where you read for a while and then realize you just read words that were grammatically correct but held no actual meaning.
The article discusses that B-2s would be overkill, since the Houthis have no relevant air-defense. It speculates about Iran instead.
Refocusing on outcomes is a good start.

Getting voting constituencies to do so is a big lift.

And that might be easier than getting people to look at places where ideological assumptions about production dynamics need examination (including the obvious shortcomings of the hope that a laissez faire market will naturally solve housing supply problems).
In fairness, and NHS didn't get tested at the ballot in 2016. There's a structural problem with parties of the "left", namely that they're hostages of their predominantly centre-right memberships. Labour in the UK has the same problem, as do the Socialist party in France. Pretty much all social democratic parties have been hollowed out by a managerial class (alongside career lawyers and the like) that their traditional bases aren't welcome. This stymies the ability of left wing populists who would challenge the current system and bring about policies like universal healthcare to even run in the first place.

What's worse is that they'll inevitably be attacked by those same centrist incumbents while they do run: Jeremy Corbyn was a great example of this. One of his fiercest critics is now a minister for health, another was made a Lord, others are now safely pickled in think tanks which will tide them over nicely until they can return to the fold.

The only way to fix this is to do as the right have done across Europe: to accept that it'll be a very long haul indeed until your people get power, and to start insurgent, radical parties. This sidesteps the big incumbent parties as a filter, and makes it clear who one's friends are. That's what needs to happen in the US on the left, but the odds of it paying off in anything less than decades are staggeringly low.
wuffs has the same story as rlbox in firefox. They made the tool, they proved it could work with one library, and then proceeded to ignore it for all the other libraries.

https://hacks.mozilla.org/2020/02/securing-firefox-with-weba...
Not sure if it is my problem, but I can't access the site, it is blocked by a firewall I've never set up (and I'm using mobile data).
In the last 20 years the US population has increased by 15%. And that population has also grown older and sicker, so demand is way up.

Healthcare supply and pricing is heavily controlled so you're correct that simple market based economic theories don't explain much about how it operates.
Additional Dwelling Units, basically additional houses on lots traditionally zoned for only one.
All user facing LLMs go through Reinforcement Learning. Contrary to popular belief, RL's _primary_ purpose isn't to "align" them to make them "safe." It's to make them actually usable.

LLMs that haven't gone through RL are useless to users. They are very unreliable, and will frequently go off the rails spewing garbage, going into repetition loops, etc.

RL learning involves training the models on entire responses, not token-by-token loss (1). This makes them orders of magnitude more reliable (2). It forces them to consider what they're going to write. The obvious conclusion is that they plan (3). Hence why the myth that LLMs are strictly next token prediction machines is so unhelpful and poisonous to discuss.

The models still _generate_ response token-by-token, but they pick tokens _not_ based on tokens that maximize probabilities at each token. Rather they learn to pick tokens that maximize probabilities of the _entire response_.

(1) Slight nuance: All RL schemes for LLMs have to break the reward down into token-by-token losses. But those losses are based on a "whole response reward" or some combination of rewards.

(2) Raw LLMs go haywire roughly 1 in 10 times, varying depending on context. Some tasks make them go haywire almost every time, other tasks are more reliable. RL'd LLMs are reliable on the order of 1 in 10000 errors or better.

(3) It's _possible_ that they don't learn to plan through this scheme. There are alternative solutions that don't involve planning ahead. So Anthropic's research here is very important and useful.

P.S. I should point out that many researchers get this wrong too, or at least haven't fully internalized it. The lack of truly understanding the purpose of RL is why models like Qwen, Deepseek, Mistral, etc are all so unreliable and unusable by real companies compared to OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic's models.

This understanding that even the most basic RL takes LLMs from useless to useful then leads to the obvious conclusion: what if we used more complicated RL? And guess what, more complicated RL led to reasoning models. Hmm, I wonder what the next step is?
Home owners are by far the majority, so battling home owners is an easy ticket to defeat.
No one said it isn’t a privilege.

I don’t agree with making driving something only the wealthy do, though.
This is ideal if you're a landlord, but hell if you're a tenant.
And DNA?
You are running on an instruction set of four symbols at the end of the day but that's the wrong level of abstraction to talk about your humanity, isn't it?
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.

No one cared. One of the better things a president has done for the country in quite a while, and no one cared, and no one remembers.
Whoever came up with it, I don't like this "vibe" thing.
What's with us and accepting any half-baked terminology AI folks come up with that day?

They use 8-bit floats instead of 32-bit floats and call it a quantized model. They put inexperienced people in front of LLM chatbots and have them do collaborative editing and call that vibing.

Why do we embrace any term they have in store for us whether it is actually significant or not?
The odd trouble was that ordinary people saw the Harris campaign as being preoccupied with the issues of a lunatic fringe online plus what conservatives said Harris was preoccupied with.

Harris would have had to kick the lunatic fringe to the curb but didn’t have the will to do so.
I think this statement concisely embeds the premise that might be the root cause of much of the problem.

That premise is "For something to have worth, someone has to be willing to pay for it".

That is only true for the narrowest definition of worth. If worth is reduced to a property to facilitate trade and nothing else then it works.

Worth can also carry a sense of non-tradable value, It can be meaningful. You can do something because you like doing it and someone else could be glad you were doing it. Requiring a financial transaction to turn that goodwill into self esteem seems to be a fundamental problem with our society.
I don't think this "vibe" fad is going to age well. It seems like positive marketing around accepting AI slop as the new normal.
Very few of these should actually be bitmap images, but I guess you could try asking the model to convert the image to HTML/CSS/SVG/whatever.
I think the Europeans want to live in a society, have a good life and want all this to be coordinated by a common entity - the government. It’s also socially acceptable to take down the government you really don’t like. Be it by force or political means, government in Europe come and go all the time.

Another thing is, Europe tends to have parliamentary democracies, so if your party loses an election it doesn’t mean it’s all over, it means you your say is smaller but still relevant.

So in Europe governments are politically inefficient but the state is usually alright, it keeps working regardless of the political situation. There are instances where there’s is no president or government for years.

Anyway, if you hate your government that much or don’t trust it that much why don’t you fix it instead of making your life hard?
On the other hand, hardware wants to be used.

Also, an attack in Yemen is a message to Iran.

Also #2, "Trump sends second aircraft carrier to Middle East in ramp up against Houthis"

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/21/trump-air-craft-car...
Swift Testing Workgroup
I wouldn't say that's free-loader behavior :) It's exactly what we want to make possible—if you have strong reason to use your own models (price, convenience, security, remaining local, or other) then Continue is built for that
Had lots of tight curves on it and quite a few places where you’d stop for a stop sign and then start up again. Fast engine = rocket off from those starts. Good handling = don’t need to decelerate in the curves.
I think it'd be good to start with a friends compound but then as you age, purchase additional lots so once everyone had families it would essentially be a neighborhood of friends. I'm not sure how you'd actually do that in real life without doing a bunch of new builds on land you prepurchased for that purpose though.
Yeah, but Waymo only drives in few selected environments. Unlike Teslas, they can't just self-drive on any random road.
> invest tens of millions of public dollars every year into new public housing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-room_occupancy

An SRO costs 25% as much to build as a studio apartment.

The real obvious solution is to take all of the money we are pumping into "long-term" affordable housing options into basically just dormitories. If it's good enough for college students, it should be good enough for anyone looking to get off the streets.

I think people really underrate how much of a knock-on affect there would be if we built enough SROs to meet demand. It would essentially establish a housing "floor" in any housing market, and undercut the ability to rent-seek up the rest of the housing market.
Text != Chat. Chat is an abbreviated form of text that isn't particularly great for most purposes even among literate people.
we each enter the corridors for our own purposes and yet they are one
Sweet looking lockscreen for Linux system
> I'm interested in things

This song, and this particular line, are a part of my religion.
A mic and lights can be cheaper than a department store suit.

Wouldn't really call it an investment.
I actually think it's kind of a good sign that the policy was able to be passed without significant immediate disruptions.

I have some pretty radical views about the benefits of land value taxes, but I don't think it's a good idea to immediately change all taxes by a large amount because disruptions are very painful. If you can enact positive incentives slowly with gradual changes then you can avoid disruptions while moving towards a better future.
One might think that Trump had just beaten Lenin rather than Biden, judging by the rhetoric
I honestly have had incredible luck finding good parties but no idea how I would ever find one again if my current one fell apart. It's such a difficult task and yet it manages to happen naturally.
I'm not contrasting voice with text, I'm contrasting chat with voice and with most other forms of text.
I wonder how much of these conclusions are Claude-specific (given that Anthropic only used Claude as a test subject) or if they extrapolate to other transformer-based models as well. Would be great to see the research tested on Llama and the Deepseek models, if possible!
No group can provide such guarantee (because systemic corruption).
A language for building concurrent software with confidence
How are housing and government services not social issues?
Not Censored, Just Quiet
As someone who went to public schools and has food allergies, schools I went to just… didn’t account for students with allergies beyond “don’t include nuts.”
And no users which are facing a LLM today have been trained on next token prediction when they were babies. I believe that LLMs and us are thinking in two very different ways, like airplanes, birds, insects and quad-drones fly in very different ways and can perform different tasks. Maybe no bird looking at a plane would say that it is flying properly. Instead it could be only a rude approximation, useful only to those weird bipeds an scary for everyone else.

By the way, I read your final sentence with the meaning of my first one and only after a while I realized the intended meaning. This is interesting on its own. Natural languages.
Is it that they don't understand, or that they actively seek that result?
Tie minimum wage to the cost of housing on a per city or per zip code basis. When the middle class and wealthy are negatively impacted by their restaurants, grocery stores, etc becoming expensive (or shutting down) due to labor costs then they will relent. "I hate more housing, but I love to eat affordably." Connect labor prices to the cost of assets in some meaningful way.

I personally think people should not work for a wage less than they need to buy the crappiest home in their town which would negate this need, but the lower-classes haven't developed enough self-esteem or entitlement for that.
Parsing Excel files in simple data interchange use cases that don't involve anyone manually using spreadsheets is an instance of unnecessary complexity. There are plenty of alternatives to CSV that remain plaintext, have much broader support, and are more rigorous than Excel in ensuring data consistency. You can use JSON, XML, ProtoBuf, among many other options.
Really fun game. I was happy when I thought I screwed up the final level only to realize my screwup was the solution.
Fix is released! Thanks for catching this so early

Should now be able to remix PyTorch rules for example: https://hub.continue.dev/starter/pytorch-rules/remix
H&M to use digital clones of models in ads and social media
99% of evolution was spent on single cell organisms. Intelligence only took 0.1% of evolution's training compute.
Let's be real. The Republicans would absolutely ruin any such institution the moment they'd get the chance. Better to keep health care private and instead socialize insurance. A hollowing-out of insurance is far easier to reverse than a hollowing-out of hospitals and clinics. An NHS led by an openly antagonistic government is not long for this world. Look at what the Trump admin is doing to other government services. The German model is far more Republican-proof than the British one.