skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Keep in mind, Oracle was designed to run with 128KB of RAM (no swapping). So it was really tens of thousands of lines, not millions.
Understanding one level of abstraction doesn't mean you understand the levels of abstraction built on top of it. And vice versa.
His articles are very long, but I find the narratives they present to be compelling. This one is a bit different than the prior two, in that it's summarizing them and putting them into context, while also doing a lot of explaining (maybe too much) about why he is a skeptic and why he thinks it's important, compared to being cautiously optimistic (which he excoriates with justifies his reasoning for doing so).
Just don’t ask it about the tiananmen square massacre or you’ll get a security warning. Even if you rephrase it.

It’ll happily talk about Bloody Sunday.

Probably a great model, but it worries me that it has such restrictions.

Sure OpenAI also has lots of restrictions, but this feels more like straight up censorship since it’ll happily go on about bad things the governments of the west have done.
Sorry meant profiles for the device. You can get profiles with MDM.
Two women who spied for Russia tracked down and named by BBC
Only in the U.S: Network is everything, it doesn't have to be 88% market share. But if it is 0.01%, and limited to 4% of the geo population, good luck. Open up to 200 countries, people can't even sign up while on a trip oversea.
VRAM Required = Number of Parameters (in billions) × Number of Bytes per Parameter × Overhead[0].

[0]: https://twm.me/posts/calculate-vram-requirements-local-llms/
Oh, so now we are talking about levels of political integration? I thought we were talking about cuisines.
You do not appear to understand the difference between "necessary" and "sufficient".

Process isolation is not sufficient (i.e. adequate on its own) to make a SQL server secure against maliciously crafted inputs intended to cause SQL injection for the purpose of undesired database access because it does not sprinkle magical security pixie dust on it.

Process isolation is necessary (in practice) to make a SQL server secure against maliciously crafted inputs intended to cause SQL injection for the purpose of undesired database access because otherwise a attacker can just modify the code of the SQL server to directly do the undesired database accesses. Without process isolation your SQL server security/design can be bypassed.

The amazing thick walls of your castle do not matter if you built it on sand. The amazing solid bedrock is not sufficient to claim your castle is defensible if your castle is a wooden shack, but it is necessary for building a defensible castle.
NASA Scraps Promise to Land 'First Woman and Person of Color' on the Moon
If you even can with ASLR. Most modern boxes would disable stuff like this.
ads again. somehow. its like a law of nature.
I added a children's pain scale to some software (faces in varying levels of pain that children can point to). I know my mom had chronic back pain that she complained about, but I never really thought about it. She functioned, she got through life. She was over for dinner at the time and I must have brought the scale up in discussion. I grabbed a paper copy and asked her what her pain level was, and she pointed to the second worst. Even after that I just kind of wrote off her pain like, she functions (though sometimes I would have to go get her as she got stranded in a supermarket in too much pain to move), and that's just life. I can watch a movie of some random acting dog whimper and fake limp and have to wipe tears from my eyes, but almost instantly went to ignoring my own mother's pain because she powered through. I hope it's not because acknowledging my mother's pain would have created a cost for me (doing more for her, acknowledging would create a long term burden on me versus the quick/easy/kind of cathartic/self serving release of emotion of a sad movie) but part of me thinks that's partially the case. What's the point in measuring when our response is still just a shrug?
Yes I also believe the same though I only believe in either grok , gemini or claude ai of the western world.

Gemini isn't too special , it's actually just comparable to deepseek / less than deepseek but it is damn fast so maybe forget gemini for true tasks.

Grok / gemini can be used as a deep research model which I think I like ? Grok seems to have just taken the deepseek approach but just scaled it by their hyper massive gpu cluster, I am not sure I think that grok can also be replaced.

What I truly believe in is claude.

I am not sure but claude really feels good for coding especially.

For any other thing I might use something like deepseek / chinese models

I used cerebras.ai and holy moly they are so fast , I used the deepseek 70 b model , it is still something incredibly fast and my time matters so I really like the open source way so that companies like cereberas can focus on what they do best.

I am not sure about nvidia though. Nvidia seems so connected to the western ai that deepseek improvements impact nvidia.

I do hope that nvidia cheapens the price of gpu though I don't think they have much incentive.
They are conventionally warranted for 20 years, but that's just a guarantee they won't lose more than 20% from their nominal capacity over that time period. Silicon PV (the kind that dominates the market currently) continues to produce after that, continuing to degrade, but more slowly than in the first decade after installation. Many of the PV panels produced in the 01970s still work today.

So embargoing or blockading PV exports to the US would be a threat that the US might start to produce less energy 20 or 30 years in the future. This is very different from the situation with oil, where the Strategic Petroleum Reserve contains 19 days of petroleum consumption. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Petroleum_Reserve_(U....

20 years versus 19 days is a significant difference, I feel. 20 years would be long enough for a functioning country to develop a solar-module industry from scratch, though the US probably couldn't. Think about the state of the Chinese PV industry 20 years ago, for example.
Nah, it's great for things that Western models are censored on. The True Hacker will keep an Eastern and Western model available, depending on what they need information on.
Between this kind of story, and the "journalist in on Houthi attack planning", it's pretty clear that the "national security secrets" are pretty carelessly kept hidden. Apparently they just don't matter.
Undetectable AI service used for coding interviews made $2.2M ARR in 50 Days
But eval is opaque; it implements a particular dialect and that'w what you get when you recurse into it. It looks like Autology provides a way to customize the dialect that eval will process recursively. Interpreter extensions that handle subexpressions via eval will then work in the context of the altered dialect (that being provided by a parent interpreter extension itself).
Software Engineer Runs Generative AI on 20-Year-Old PowerBook G4 – MacRumors
Hims is one.
>What is the term "things we like" representing here?

Generally, things that comport with the (by definition, arbitrary) axioms we've chosen to ground our world view.
If you want to put a tinfoil hat on, one could argue external state actors could have convinced the Trump admin their provided forms of communication are tapped, so they should consider alternatives. Such a state actor would know the alternatives are compromised well in advance by them.
https://micro-editor.github.io/
Windy uses openmeteo, which in turn aggregates many weather providers under one roof/api
> Creationism is a canned joke ideological point that American Christians of all types seemingly can't get enough of.

this is uninformed and prejudiced on its face. In Theology graduate class, the first week of lecture included the division between "literalist" Biblical traditions, and others. It is well known among anyone who has studied comparative religion in any way that Christians are not at all unified in the interpretation of Genesis, despite outward appearances.
Most of the powerful corporations in 1982 no longer exist or are much smaller because there is great turnover in corporate power. Governments don't lose power unless they lose a war, a rare event today that was common 100 years ago.
Because securing things that don't need to be secured (which is most of the Internet, frankly) is a waste of time and effort. Unless you are handling credentials or other sensitive data, you don't need TLS and shouldn't bother.
The "but her emails" jokes in this context are all about the 2016 election.
> There is nothing in this verse which says that property is to be expropriated for the purposes of assuring others a particular standard of living, and I don’t think you’ll be able to find one.

You're right; we have the free will to be as miserly as we choose. But if you want to be of Christ, you'll give your 5% or 10%, at least.

Our societies also have the free will to choose to tax the rich to help the poor. A govt run by actual Christians would not let the rich trample the poor and our shared environment, our human family's inheritance and future.

Yes, everyone is free to be a selfish asshole -- "there is not compulsion in religion" is God's command, too -- but our govt should reflect the generosity of spirit we are called to manifest.

If you don't like the taxes, find another place to ply your wares.

> You’ve ignored my question. If Jesus is God, and God rewarded Job with material wealth in this world, how can Jesus be said to offer an unambiguous criticism of wealth?

If one has acquired it by cheating or abusing others or selling harmful products or without paying one's fair tax rate, then those are ill-gotten gains are bad for the person who chose to live that way and bad for the society they are parasitizing.

So, yes, God's Messengers of love can have whatever beneficience our Lord bestows upon them, but it will not be ill-gotten and it will not be for the selfish pleasure and will never be wasted, for "God does not love the wasters".

Most of all, what is important to remember is that we cannot love both God and money, i.e. we cannot serve two masters. We must be generous with others out of love for them, and be grateful to God that we have been granted God's generosity to have better circumstances.

To love someone means wanting them to be happy. Any kind of "love" that does not result in effortful action -- i.e. actual service -- for the other person is nothing but empty words, and we must live the truth of God's teachings of love.

"Love thy neighbor as your own self." Not more, not less. We are given the choice in money matters and it is a sore trial for most human beings. But God's teachings of love are clear as day to those with eyes to see, ears to hear, and a heart that understands.
Not sure where this HN title comes from since it's not the original but I have a gripe with the way it represents Peano's Axioms as THE building blocks of arithmetic. Instead of just one of the many attempts at coming up with a set of axioms that can serve as the building blocks of Arithmetic
Qwen 3 is coming imminently as well https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/pull/36878 and it feels like Llama 4 should be coming in the next month or so.

That said none of the recent string of releases has done much yet to "smash a wall", they've just met the larger proprietary models where they already were. I'm hoping R2 or the like really changes that by showing ChatGPT 3->3.5 or 3.5->4 level generational jumps are still possible beyond the current state of the art, not just beyond current models of a given size.
Money from the Chinese defense budget?

Everyone using these models undercuts US companies.

Eventually China wins.
Isn't experimentation.
Don't know why, but to me there is little that I find more interesting than axiomes in math. ZFC / Peano always fascinated me, especially in the light of Gödels incomplete theorem.
It does really feel like we are men watching our women and children accosted. We feel impotent as the public currently.
If nationalist propaganda counts as ads, that might already be supporting Chinese models. Ask them about Tiananmen Square.

Any kind of media with zero or near zero copying/distribution costs becomes a deflationary race to the bottom. Someone will eventually release something that's free, and at that point nothing can compete with free unless it's some kind of very specialized offering. Then you run into a the problem the OP described: how do you fund free? Answer: ads. Now the customer is the advertiser, not the user/consumer, which is why most media converges on trash.
Maybe from NVIDIA? "Commoditize your product's complement".

https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/06/12/strategy-letter-v/
Hm, these instructions are interesting -- is it suggesting I repeatedly pick up an entire slice of pie with a fork and take bites out of it?
It hasn't been retired. Using HTTPS everywhere is cargo cult nonsense. Most sites do not benefit from it, and the push to have it everywhere is obnoxious as hell.
DeepSeek's website seems to be using two models. The one that censors only does so in the online version. Are you saying that censoring happens with this model, even in the offline version?
> Oh, so now we are talking about levels of political integration? I thought we were talking about cuisines.

If you wanted to talk about cuisines you would have been better served to talk about cuisines instead of mutual intelligibility in speech and writing. Maybe next time you should say the thing you want to say instead of something else, I guess.
Sub exposures are taken explicitly to avoid this issue. It also lets you easily to be planes and satellites.
Both of them are better than any American models. Both for reasoning, agentic, fine tuning etc.
I just started self hosting as well on my local machine, been using https://lmstudio.ai/ Locally for now.

I think the 32b models are actually good enough that I might stop paying for ChatGPT plus and Claude.

I get around 20 tok/second on my m3 and I can get 100 tok/second on smaller models or quantized. 80-100 tok/second is the best for interactive usage if you go above that you basically can’t read as fast as it generates.

I also really like the QwQ reaoning model, I haven’t gotten around to try out using locally hosted models for Agents and RAG especially coding agents is what im interested in. I feel like 20 tok/second is fine if it’s just running in the background.

Anyways would love to know others experiences, that was mine this weekend. The way it’s going I really dont see a point in paying, I think on-device is the near future and they should just charge a licensing fee like DB provider for enterprise support and updates.

If you were paying $20/mo for ChatGPT 1 year ago, the 32b models are basically at that level but slightly slower and slightly lower quality but useful enough to consider cancelling your subscriptions at this point.
Some people have this idea that when they write utter nonsense it should do what they meant because - ie they're missing out the whole discipline of programming and going straight from "I want it to work" to "It should work" and don't understand what they're doing wrong.

For some of these people WG14 (the C language sub-committee of SC22, the programming language sub-committee of JTC1, the Joint Technical Commitee between ISO and the IEC) is the problem because somehow they've taken this wonderful language where you just write stuff and it definitely works and does what you meant and turned into something awful.

This doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but hey, they wrote nonsense and they're angry that it didn't work, do we expect high quality arguments from people who mumble nonsense and make wild gestures on the street because they've imagined they are wizards? We do not.

There are others who blame the compiler vendors, this at least makes a little more sense, the people who write Clang are literally responsible for how your nonsense C is translated into machine code which does... something. They probably couldn't have read your mind and ensured the machine code did what you wanted, especially because your nonsense doesn't mean that, but you can make an argument that they might do a better job of communicating the problem (C is pretty hostile to this, and C programmers no less so)

For a long time I thought the best idea was to give these people what they ostensibly "want" a language where it does something very specific, as a result it's slow and clunky and maybe after you've spent so much effort to produce a bigger, slower version of the software a friend wrote in Python so easily these C programmers will snap out of it.

But then I read some essays by C programmers who had genuinely set out on this path and realised to their horror that their fellow C programmers don't actually agree what their C programs mean, the ambiguity isn't some conspiracy by WG14 or the compiler vendors, it's their reality, they are bad at writing software. The whole point of software is that we need to explain exactly what the machine is supposed to do, when we write ambiguous programs we are doing a bad job of that.
Do you know if there are any SNPs correlated with poor desloratadine metabolizers?
Private listening audio tech works like projectable virtual headphones
Turo is a good mechanism for this too.

Around my area there are dozens of mid range cars, most prevalently the Chrysler 300C, that are "available" to rent for $600/day. Not that you can find availability, even if you wanted to rent that car at that rate...

Dealer gives trusted client money to rent their car (spoiler: car keys never change hands). Client rents the car for extended periods. Dealer helpfully sends client starting and ending odometer pictures and such to close out the rental. Rinse, repeat.
Democrat what? There's no power anywhere outside of the Trump circle.
SXSW Session – How "Good" Management Creates Bad Technology
It seems odd that as a society it's been deemed a-okay to pathologize a cluster of traits shared by 30% of the population.
This is honestly a pretty perfect example of why criticising programming languages can be so frustrating: people are completely unwilling to meet you where you're at. You're response here is to say that of course while-let does that, because that's what while-let does, that's how while-let looks. I'm not being critical of Rust having pattern matching as the while-loop condition, but of how this is expressed in code, specifically with how it looks exactly like an ordinary variable definition, but doesn't at all function like one, and how that can be confusing to a non-zero amount of people. That's the extent of my complaint. I'm ganna go now.
Discussion (242 points, 3 hours ago, 56 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43462783
BJJ. Good luck, but just so you know- SLAP tears don't heal on their own. There's not enough bloodflow to the area, and the actual physical substance of the labrum for the both of us has been ripped apart. It may or may not bother you (mine doesn't 80% of the time), but it also never heals. So you're at risk of tearing it further, which then becomes a Big Deal. I stopped doing BJJ for this reason
Please try to make HN comments more like a freaking Brookings Institute report instead of more like /b/ on 4chan. Doing the opposite fosters the kind of environment you claim to want to avoid, where people call you names instead of rebutting your claims with evidence.
The Democrats really are the Charlie Brown of politics, and the Republicans are Lucy with the football.
Yeah, this is the obvious objection to the doom. Someone has to pay to train the model that all the small ones distill from.

Companies will have to detect and police distilling if they want to keep their moat. Maybe you have to have an enterprise agreement (and arms control waiver) to get GPT-6-large API access.
The current approach of the maintainers terrifies me -- de facto standards should be respected. Even if something is invalid like `description-file`, if it is present in 12k repos it should raise a warning and not break anything.

In the rationale for this that I can find [1], a maintainer says the following:

> I'm inclined to say we should do it, even though it will cause some disruption.

They also say an alternative is to "accept the status quo", which is exactily what they should be doing. I can't find maintainers giving a compelling reason not to support this status quo of `long-description` as an alias to `long_description` besides "simplifying code." Code simplification should never take precedence over massive breakage of compatibility.

[1] https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/pull/4870#pullrequestrevi...
> We beat the nazis together

If you by "we" mean Britain, the United States, and Russia. And by "we" mean the people living 2 generations earlier, then I agree with your statement.

As a side note, people who were 18 in 1940, would be 103 today. So most people who fought in the second world war have unfortunately passed away.

I personally would never say "We beat the nazis together". The only thing I did was benefit from the war that generations before me have won.
Or maybe they come through with the microplastics.
Any more info on the new Google model?
I like NextJS and this vulnerability requires a specific self-hosting arrangement coupled with specific flag

I think this discussion is bringing a lot of unrelated angst out of the wood works that is beyond the level of rationality warranted

I think its rightful to be skeptical of Vercel’s incentives to vendor lock, and how long it took to deal with this vulnerability. Thats all independent of most of what I’m reading here
If a business can be open source, it'll be open source
Are there any good sources that I can read up on estimiating what would be hardware specs required for 7B, 13B, 32B .. etc size If I need to run them locally? I am grad student on budget but I want to host one locally and trying to build a PC that could run one of these models.
Are they that far ahead with manufacturing improvements?

The NYT article you linked talked about them using cheap(polluting) coal power and cheap(slave labor) mineral inputs.
It could look a lot like religion, but also a lot like philosophy, science, or ethics.

Making value judgments and projecting them into the future is fundamental to conscious being operating in a causal world.

Beliefs like "dont murder people" show up in religion, but that is far from the only belief set that supports the recommendation.
Our state school played the pledge of allegiance every morning, had police with drug dogs doing sweep to great praise of the administration, and military recruiters begging us to come kill enemies of the state. The sanctioning of these activities for all to witness was part of the indoctrination -- praise for god was just replaced for worship of the government. Meanwhile basic civil stuff like how to invoke your rights a traffic stop was never even mentioned.

This is why even as a hardline atheist I have sent at times my kid to private religious education, and I hope I can continue to afford it. Neither system is great but worshipping someone who exists only as an ideal entity in your mind seems marginally better than worshipping the world's largest incarceration machine and military aggressor.
What's the deal with all these airplane crashes?
The better memory usage argument is not as one sided as it may appear. The issue related to using a growth factor of 2 appear when you have a single very big array, but for many smaller ones it's not really an issue. Meanwhile allocators generally tend to like power of 2 sizes, and non-2 growth factors produce non-power of 2 sizes. Some data structures are also easier to implement when the size is a power of 2 because you can efficiently wrap around by using bitwise operations rather than an expensive remainer.