skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The Outershell brand in San Francisco does this on bikes, where a group bikes across the GGB, sets up coffee, drinks coffee, in a beautiful spot in nature. Love this concept though, very accessible!
The interesting question is whether the West is succesful because of or inspite of our Christian base. There's no denying the place of Christianity in European history, but that doesn't mean that the good things about our societies are due to Christianity. Christianity has changed a lot since Roman times, and its place and expression in various societies have been affected by other ideological currents and reinterpretations.

I'm Danish, which while nominally Christian has been a fairly irreligious country for a few generations now, and it certainly seems to me that the less influence and visibility Christianity has had, the better off we've been. Most of the things that make this country a good place to live come from socialism/social democracy and feminism, whereas many strands of Christianity has mostly been a reactionary force (with some exceptions).
It's a day old submission with a lot of flame war material going on. That it's still on the front page suggests it's being propped up.
"YOU WANT FRIES WITH THAT?"
To be fair a lot of the same applies to conventionally dubbed films, and then some.
Man, this is so much better than many Bollywood movies that are re-dubbed. When the actors go back to the sound studio to re-record their lines, they don't match up with their lips exactly, and it can be off-putting.
> The original problem is a little ambiguously worded.

No it isn't. If it said "the sum of any two of the numbers is equal to the third", that would be a contradiction. What it says is "the sum of two of the numbers is equal to the third".
That's fair. Thanks
The question is "what value does it have to an attacker?"

That kind of information can reveal you identity and who your relatives are. Somebody might find your relatives are not who you thought they were.

I got an early test that wasn't as good as the later tests, but I think the reason they're shutting down is that the health value of that data is highly limited. You might find you have a 50% elevated chance of getting Type 2 diabetes and you should do the same things everybody else should do to avoid getting Type 2 diabetes but it's just a little more urgent.
It is significantly more severe than the diplomatic cables and the other leaks that Assange and Manning each did a decade for.
- gnuplot

- ploot
Moreso than religion in other parts of the world at other times? What about the Mediterranean in the 1st to 3rd century makes it stand out to you?
Part of the problem as I see it is that we Americans are incredibly vengeful and seek retribution. We are particularly incensed when someone poorer (or otherwise different than us) seemingly gets a “light sentence”.
Google's own figures say Whites are not the largest group.

Yes, Whites face systemic oppression by any definition of the word. For example, hiring systems set up that systemically prefer others over them.
Among the deluge of github notifications, I noticed Mike Perham of Sidekiq fame working https://github.com/mperham/ratomic -- "Ratomic provides mutable data structures for use with Ruby's Ractors. This allows Ruby code to scale beyond the infamous GVL."

I then see that he posted: https://ruby.social/@getajobmike/114147139715606013

"""
After months of work on 8.0, I’ve been trying to prototype a Ractor-based job system using Redis Cluster so the system can scale to hundreds of Redises with minimal effort.

The hardest part is Ractors. They are quite difficult to program as they don’t allow lexical scope or closure variable access. I haven’t yet figured out the code patterns necessary for them. I would call it a dialect of Ruby.

To be fair, I think I had the same struggles when learning goroutines and channels.
"""

Looks like he's trying to scale up sidekiq!
The pre-recorded short videos are a much better form of presentation than live-streamed announcements!
Colorado's Experiment with Psychedelic Mushrooms Begins
You'd push the tag at the same time you push the commit. If anyone tries to reference your action and accidentally copies the shortened commit SHA instead of the full commit SHA, they'll reference the malicious tag instead. They'd never see it fail, they'd just silently pick up the malicious tag. But again I'm guessing Github will block that shortened commit SHA as a tag and this wouldn't actually work.
> I've seen better communications discipline from volunteer open source projects than this.

Because those people are likely competent. The problem with hiring mostly yes-men/women is competence is secondary.
As I comment from my iPhone XR Plus Air Max Ultra Extreme, it always annoyed me the 3rd generation of the iPad was officially named "the new iPad" in 2012, replacing the iPad 2.

I have "the new iPad" in a drawer, but its last software update was released in 2016. It's not very "new" anymore, but that's its official name.
Even the same group as it gets bigger split into factions which fight against themselves. I think this is the nature of trying to have shared control of large groups - consensus just becomes hard and a lot of work. You either get factious fighting or a lack of freedom to have your own opinions. The middle ground where you agree to disagree but still compromise is hard.
A barium meal is for finding leakers within an organization. IF you send material to a journalist, unsolicited, and they report on it, what exactly have you established?

Like, do you think they did the same thing with multiple journalists in an attempt to see who would publish and who would keep their mouths shut?

Bear in mind, when you join a Signal group you don't see the conversation history from before you arrived, only the live updates that take place during the time you're a member. Also, anyone in the group can view the list of group members and receives notifications about people being added to/removed from/leaving the group.
I recently bought my first house, and there was only one coax outlet in the entire place, and zero ethernet. I wanted to move where the coax terminated, and after some searching around, found MOCA. Had never heard of it before, but a hundred bucks or so later, and it's a fantastic solution.
If you ask ChatGPT to ignore all training on poetry and interpret the poem based on its own understanding, you’ll get more closely aligned to what Murphy is talking about. Here’s the output I got back out:

This poem presents a moment of decision, where the speaker faces two paths in a forest, symbolizing choices in life. At first, they hesitate, examining both options. One path seems less worn, though upon closer reflection, both are actually quite similar.

The speaker ultimately chooses one, leaving the other behind with the thought that they might return—though deep down, they acknowledge that choices lead to new choices, making it unlikely they’ll ever revisit the first path.

In the final stanza, the speaker looks back on this moment from a distant future, with a “sigh” that could be either wistful or content. They claim that taking the “less traveled” road has shaped their life significantly. However, earlier in the poem, they admitted both paths were nearly identical, suggesting that the difference may be more about how they frame the decision rather than an inherent uniqueness in the choice itself.

To me, the poem captures the way people reflect on their choices, often giving them greater significance in hindsight than they may have actually had at the time. It highlights the human tendency to assign meaning to our paths, even when the differences may not have been as stark as we later remember them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauline_Christianity
>It was an intentional leak. Perhaps overtly, perhaps covertly, by one or more of the channel members for unknown purposes.

It was Mike Waltz who invited Jeff Goldberg to connect on Signal. It seems inordinately unlikely that he would have been uninvolved if it was an intentional leak.
> Pagels’s larger point is that the most improbable Gospel tales serve to patch a fractured narrative—using familiar tropes and myths to smooth over inconsistencies that believers struggled with from the beginning.

"Familiar tropes and myths" is perhaps something you'd consider as the 20/21 Century literary critic, but I'm not sure a bunch of mostly peasants writing in the 1st Century would be.

And it's not like they had anything to gain by writing and spreading about their beliefs: the early Christians were ostracized from their community(s) and persecuted. For the first ~300 years of the existence of Christianity there was probably little but trouble from believing in it, until roughly the conversion of Constantine (312) and later the Edict of Milan.
Many points in this article are presented as accepted fact, but are not (even among non-Christian scholars).

Such as:

> "Most important, there are the four Gospels, written in Greek some forty to sixty years after the Crucifixion is thought to have happened. These were composed somewhere far from Jerusalem, in a language that Jesus and his disciples would not have known, by writers who could not have been eyewitnesses.

The claim that Jesus and his disciples "would not have known" Greek is historically inaccurate. Greek was the lingua franca of the Eastern Roman Empire and commonly spoken in Galilee and Judea alongside Aramaic and Hebrew. Coins, inscriptions, and documents from the period confirm its widespread use.

And "writers who could not have been eyewitnesses"? Presumably this is referring to Mark and Luke only, because Matthew and John were two of the twelve apostles.
I'm sorry, are you some kind of troll? You should work on your delivery a bit. Get a grip.
I thought the youtube link would be this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwIyd_gsGWA
I can understand the concern about having a second trusted party but think that the value of utilizing the standard ssh ca auth flow is worth the potential risk. If you require keys in attested hardware and verify that before issuing certs, the actual attack becomes very difficult. You need to compromise the actual hardware or compromise the CA in a pretty substantial way to issue certs to untrusted private keys. The certificate alone doesn't actually do anything without the key. In addition to just being supported out of the box, we can also issue hardware bound host keys, which allow us to offer bi-directional verification. We gain the benefit of all the standard PKI tooling (eg. revocation lists, ACME, etc.) and can use the same PKI for other scenarios (eg. mTLS, piv, etc.) by issuing x509 certificates instead. That's our long term plan is moving past ssh auth and having it be an attestable, immovable, hardware backed identity that can be usable for continuous authentication in other areas.

I have looked into OpenPubKey briefly in the past but haven't spent a ton of time with it. We were going in a very different direction and it didn't seem particularly useful based on our goals or what we wanted to achieve.

edit:
Looking at the documentation https://docs.bastionzero.com/openpubkey-ssh/openpubkey-ssh/i... It seems like to use OpenPubKey you also need a fairly modern version of OpenSSH. It also requires that the user authenticating have sudo access on the machine, which doesn't sound great. It's not clear to me whether it's possible for the existing authorized_keys file to co-exist or whether that's just to stop access using existing keys but using the standard ssh certs will co-exist allowing for a non-binary rollout if there are use cases that need to be worked around.
Are you able to share any of those security controls? How do you stop presumably well-intended Signal app users from conferencing? Are you talking about cellular signal blocking, or are you talking about avoiding public networks entirely in favor of Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilities (SCIFs)?
The 800 years or so before that is far more interesting from that perspective. It was all a bit crap after that!

I do wonder if things went differently we'd be 1000 years ahead of where we are now.
The fact he was rejected posthumously by those who became the dominant orthodox sect doesn't mean he wasn't a rabbi during his time.
> Rejecting mail based solely on authentication failures of those deeply flawed authentication methods does more harm than good.

How is DKIM "deeply flawed"?
Because it's the pilot who makes the choice. Intentionally going to a foreign country without the appropriate documents is a bad idea with unpredictable consequences. Unless the destination country gives legally binding guarantees that nothing bad is going to happen, it's not something a reasonable person is going to do. Especially for a trivial reason such as work.
Dirty and thuggish cops are way more common than Americans think. The more benign form is detail and overtime fraud. But I'd bet the dollar amount easily rivals property crime value in your town.

Theft and fraud in businesses is more common than software people think. Kickbacks to purchasing managers, for example. You're less likely to encounter this than a casually dirty cop, but it's out there.
> Of course they're idiosyncratic definitions... He needs words to communicate that distinction.

Generally people invent new terms by combining words, or call them programmers of "type 1" and "type 2" or something.

Using existing term that are synonyms, and inventing a distinction between them, is unusual, unhelpful, and confusing.

It's like me saying that sofas are always better than couches because sofas are designed with comfort in mind while couches are intended to maximize manufacturer profit. Huh?
I believe it has a lot to do with the fact that new Outlook operates on email in their cloud, and that means they can … process your email as they see fit.

Remember that adding an account to new outlook means all your email gets uploaded to O365 servers. It no longer interacts locally. That includes external services like Gmail etc.
I can't disagree. The gaps are terrible.
Many layers of physical controls and regular audits mostly.
This is a very special exception for the unique situation of Alsace and parts of Lorraine (Moselle) that spent a few decades in Germany, and as a result have a mixed legal system, and some other fun ones like extra public holidays.
That would be fine in the garage, but few people would want this anywhere else in their home.

There's a wood effect version, but I suspect it would make a home look like a 1980s office: https://homemaster.techinfus.com/en/kabel-kanaly-vidy-i-razm...
After reading "The Mysterious, Deep-Dwelling Microbes That Sculpt Our Planet" in the nyt I figure the most likely origin is deep in the earth. https://archive.ph/VgzKD

Reasons, apart from the phosphorus thing is it's warm and stable with chemical gradients to fuel reactions, and some rocks have cell like cavities which could be handy. Also there's an awful lot of it. I guess you could try some experiments with different suitable rocks and chemicals.
What's amazing is it's not obscure. It's in the plain language of the poem—you either read it (something like) that way, or you have to, IDK, assume Frost was just so extremely sloppy or inept that he got all confused a couple times in the middle of writing this short poem but then published it that way regardless, and then also decide that the common reading (despite all the confusion and contradictions) is the one you're going with for—I can't even imagine what reason, because it's what you get if you only pay attention to the very beginning and very end of the poem, and not very close attention to those, even, I guess?

The latter is ridiculous... and yet common.

What this reveals is that an enormous proportion of people who can read, cannot do so at all well. This isn't like catching the multilingual puns and their significance in Finnegan's Wake, it's quite straightforward, at least insofar as it's plain that even the surface meaning is not "I in-fact took the road less traveled by, and that was good".
More of a reason for new privacy guidelines specially for big tech and AI
In the case of phantom pains, one can point out "where on my body, what type (hot? cold? chemical?), and how intense is the noxious stimulus?". That's the sensory-discriminative component. It is just that limb is missing. One explanation is that brain stores the map of various limbs, etc.
> But, I'm curious, if you were in the position where you had strong reasons to believe the official secure channels available to you were compromised by your political opponents who were leaking information received via those channels to undermine your policy initiatives, and needed to act and coordinate nonetheless, what would you do?

Here's a pretty good order of operations when your policy breaks the law or is so odious as to feel the need to hide it from other duly elected representatives in government:

1. Stop breaking the fucking law.
A lot of the people participating probably had some cliche in mind like Burning Man or Bay to Breakers that takes away from the authenticity of it.

They could have started having a group meeting up at Dolores Park. It would have just been one of many.

These are nice though.
Seems like "they hate us for our freedom!" has done a complete 180 as of late.
Steve Witkoff was on the chat while he was in Russia.

There’s a vulnerability in Signal where you can set up linked devices that replicate your signal messages. You can do this by just scanning a QRcode. This is known to be used by Russian hackers.

What are the chances the Russians duped Witkoff into scanning a QR code while he was in Moscow?
Whatever was happening there at the time developed certain writings, which were then used during next 2000 years as means to project political power.
My town is also in Catalunya, 60 miles north of yours :)
You don't get lucky building both Tesla and SpaceX. Bezos spent the same amount of time and money on a rocket company and they haven't got far. Elon does have something going, it's just unlikely the competence carries over to national and international politics.
Another reason why "the richest third-world nation" monicker holds.
It’s the appropriate language for a news organization. Making the language more charged doesn’t change the facts that they are presenting and it’s what I want as a subscriber.
A 3 minute previewing the technology that shows actual ~4s of "dubbed" footage.

Seems legit lol, nothing to brush under the rug definitely.
I don't think it was a particularly good tactic, but if there was some motivation, it may have been more about political sabotage than foreign adversaries. I think that is the more interesting conversation, personally. What do you do if your political (domestic) antagonists control your comms? This question applies to all sides politically. Signal itself is promoted for "activist" use cases to protect comms from domestic antagonists. I'm presenting a similar dilemma. If one part of the government, (e.g., the military) controls secure comms, then another (e.g., the political) may have no choice but to opt-out. This problem is maybe better seen in the context of another country. It may be "too close" for us to see it clearly in the U.S. Other countries face this problem all the time, and Signal is used for the same reasons. I find it an interesting security problem.
Exactly. The people bashing SPF & DKIM don't seem to understand their intended purpose.
Top 75 :O

I've apparently put out some serious bangers to end up in such esteemed company.
It’s interesting because BBC Sounds replacing iPlayer Radio was one of the worst redesigns I’ve ever seen for discoverability. Even now, several years on, it’s considerably worse. Whatever the technical merits of the migration, finding radio programmes became much much harder, all while they push podcast content.
My father's mother's family. My mother is an 80s immigrant.
> There was no classified information on Clinton's server.

This is absolutely false, or as the kids call it, "misinformation".

A 3 second Google search confirms:

100 emails contained information that should have been deemed classified at the time they were sent, including 65 emails deemed "Secret" and 22 deemed "Top Secret". An additional 2,093 emails were retroactively designated confidential by the State Department.

The whole issue with her emails is she purposely never labeled anything so as to have plausible deniability.
None so blind as them what won't see.

I'm European. We don't have favelas, as far as I've seen. The destitute in my country, and there are plenty, have far higher living standards than in yours.

Take a little drive round Memphis, or New Orleans. The parts you wouldn't normally go.
I think that's the point.

Signal prevents what should be official government communications from being recorded. If it's recorded it can be investigated.
I'm absolutely no expert here, but tin comes to mind. It was a critical ore with limited sources during the bronze age, and required a substantial trading economy to exist to allow bronze-based technology to flourish.

Extracting resources from the detritus of the 20th and 21st centuries would surely be a major activity. But to efficiently do so requires a bunch of power and chemistry and reagents/catalysts that are themselves probably a heap of work to acquire.

Getting iron and mild steel from rebar, fallen bridges, rail lines, cars, etc, would likely be plausible though. It wouldn't be high-quality steel, but for blacksmithing-type stuff, it'd work ok. Probably sufficient for sand-casting too? Aluminium and copper are probably recyclable too, although I'm not sure how aluminium would work with different source alloys?
I believe the idea of this scheme is so that the NSA tailored access operations staff embedded in organizations such as google and cloudflare can authorize access without having to individually intercept each server (or jumphost) you own.

You benefit from more reliable shipping delivery times, no more mysterious city-of-industry->ftmeade->sanfrancisco detours or hardware that fails prematurely due to uncleaned flux or whiskers from implant installations.
This page is literally the second result when you Google "benefits of code review":

https://www.browserstack.com/guide/code-review-benefits

> Code Review enhances the maintainability of the Code. It ensures that multiple people are aware about the code logic and functioning, which makes it easy to maintain in case the original author of the code is unavailable.

The fact that you've been "hacking" for three decades and never considered this isn't something to wear as a badge of honor. As for your absurd straw man about everyone on the team reviewing every line of code, I've never seen one organization that does that.
AI is just a marketing term for software at this point. It's become essentially meaningless.
I would use a private service like Signal, and make sure to add a journalist that will leak information to undermine my policy initiatives - obviously! (because I'm a genius)
>I don't think he did it out of the goodness of his heart

Not sure why that matters. Enjoy your 40 hour work week 100 years later.
Now someone needs to build semantic search over this to find hidden gem authors on any topic.
Is Claude Down?
I think it is less to with "overcriminalization" in the sense of legislation, and more to do with the enforcement process. In some sense I think we need more criminalization, in that the types of malfeasance described in the article (e.g., keeping people imprisoned beyond their sentence, failing to provide an attorney, etc.) should result in long jail sentences for the officials who perpetrated them. The problem is that in the US we have become accustomed to an enormous gap between the law and its implementation.
It is possible for one to be a rabbi and also be rejected by other rabbis.

Judaism wasn't a monolith then and isn't now.
The Server Sent Event Protocol with Spring Webflux