skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's the opposite. Most people are not are boasting about their productivity improvements but it's everywhere. Unless you work at a company where you're not allowed to use these tools it should be impossible to miss. Even the most hardcore naysayers I know are now using AI tools. The new discourse is whether the massive increase in code output leads to issues or not (I think it does), but claiming it doesn't happen is not a serious take anymore.
Yes, Quart is supported.

The full list of frameworks is: Falcon, Flask, Quart, Sanic, Starlette, and Tornado.

Looks like I accidentally missed Quart in some parts of the docs—my bad, apologies! It’s included in the examples.
And Quake.
Aiter: AI Tensor Engine for ROCm
“That’s all they do” and “just” are interchangeable. All you do is transferring electric charges across synapses, and all molecules do is bouncing off each other, but this reduction doesn’t explain neither thinking nor flying. In this case you’re saying “That’s all they do”, which means “just” to others.

Don’t even try to argue, cause all I do is typing letters and you’ll only get more letters in response ;)
Show HN: We've built an AI based Discord x Linear integration
Anyone else using Discord as their internal team chat?

We've been using the official Linear integration for Discord for a while, but it's a lot of overhead to always select the same team, repeat what the issue is, and write another description.

We've built a very simple integration that automatically pre-fills the Linear title, description, priority, and assignee using gpt-4o-mini.
Piracy is low on my list too, but so are people who do drugs as long as they do it at home[1], responsibly, so called productive junkies. Child porn is indeed high on the list, though.

Honestly, in the US, obesity is probably the number 1 factor for all sorts of illnesses and expenses, yet we do not restrict people's food, we leave it up to them, in fact, recent trends are all about how it is OK to be obese, so why care about someone unwinding after a long day of work with weed, not harming anyone, and not being a burden on the healthcare system (unlike the obese)?

You can replace weed with heroin, too, FWIW. Kratom is an alternative (illegal in some states by now), of course, but it is less clean than heroin, but this discussion is for another day.

As for the rest, I agree nevertheless.

[1] Not to be confused by people who re-use needles, litter the city with their bullshit, aggressive, stink, and so forth. My girlfriend lives in LA and she is constantly afraid of them (as she should). Many of them probably have untreated schizophrenia or something, too.
you wrote, emphatically, that it would be "still not very good". Why do you believe that it would be still not very good after training on a specific problem? LLMs aren't able to do things outside their training data, as vast as it is, but if it's in it's training data, why are you emphatic that it's still not very good? If I ask it to make something that it just needs to copy out sample code of, it would be pretty good at that one very specific task to me.
Egg cartels aren't pleasant for an already struggling working class. A lot of families rely on cheap protein, and with the other substantial dairy and food price hikes this decade, it's clear someone is pushing industries from cost-plus to a "$/person/day" target.

If you're concerned about the chickens, you should support small and independent farm subsidies and eschew factory farms that don't even have to do anything wrong to be dangerous.
Common Crawl is petabytes. Anna's Archive is about a petabyte, but it includes PDFs with images.
Define "intentions" and "understand" in a way that is testable. All you are doing here is employing intuition pumps without actually saying anything.

> LLMs are language calculators.

And humans are just chemical reactions. That's completely irrelevant to the topic, as both can still act as Universal Turing machine just the same.
The "refuses ro remove it" part is not even necessary. I run a large cloud storage site, and like all cloud storage it sees some abuse. I have set up a few processes to detect and remove child abuse content.

At some point the Police in Italy found some abusive content on my site. They did not inform me, they did not report the files. Instead they just blocked the whole site with a large pedophilia warning.

I have been trying to get in contact with the Italian police for months, but there is no working email address on any of the sites, and the people on the phone only speak Italian. It's a pretty hopeless situation.
Xi's family holds millions of dollars in business interests: U.S. Intel
How would it feel, knowing the only reason you got a seat on the rocket was because of your gender or color? In a way, it still keeps in place the alleged systemic issues, because the perception is that the institution is granting participation, it wasn’t earned. Kinda like when football teams let a kid come on the field to “score a touchdown.” Sure, they crossed the line, but nobody actually buys it.
> and we've figured out how to securely isolate "users" of the same GPU from each other

That's the problem, isn't it.

I don't want my programs to act independently, they need to exchange data with each other (copy-paste, drag and drop). Also i cannot do many things in parralel. Some thing must be done sequencially.
Currently, FastOpenAPI doesn't provide built-in support specifically for documenting streaming APIs.
As far as I'm aware, support for streaming (chunked responses) in the OpenAPI specification itself is still limited.
> The reason the appearance of this tech is so shocking is because it forces us to confront what we value, rather than letting the status quo churn along unexamined.

I think this is the most valuable part of the article. It's the writing process itself, which isn't valued in schools.
"Cregit" tool might be of interest to you, it generates token-based (rather than line-based) git "blame" annotation views: https://github.com/cregit/cregit

Example output based on Linux kernel @ "Cregit-Linux: how code gets into the kernel": https://cregit.linuxsources.org/

I learned of Cregit recently--just submitted it to HN after seeing multiple recent HN comments discussing issues related to line-based "blame" annotation granularity:

"Cregit-Linux: how code gets into the kernel": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43451654
Neither satire nor you being out-of-touch.

Sure, it could be satire, given there's always an overlap between satirists and their subjects, but that's because humans sincerely say a lot of stuff.

But I think this is just chasing the zeitgeist — I've seen a lot of that over the years.
Iman Mirzadeh on Machine Learning Street Talk (Great podcast if you haven’t already listened!) put into a words a thought I had - LLM labs are so focused on making those scores go up it’s becoming a bit of a perverse incentive.

If your headline metric is a score, and you constantly test on that score, it becomes very tempting to do anything that makes that score go up - i.e Train on the Test set.

I believe all the major ML labs are doing this now because:

- No one talks about their data set

- The scores are front and center of big releases, but there is very little discussion or nuance other than the metric.

- The repercussions of not having a higher or comparable score is massive failure and your budget will get cut.

More in depth discussion on capabilities - while harder - is a good signal of a release.
Given a certain place, somewhere in rural China or Congo or wherever, how sure are we it is the case that you can't do anything without the state ID? I for one have no clue. Maybe the reality on the ground is quite different than the theory.

And even if it is true. Even here in lets-say-civilised Romania, there's possibly a reasonable number of people who have emigrated but are still on the books. Because it takes effort to remove yourself, and little gain, so people don't do it. And the bureaucracy certainly does not do it by itself. They don't care in the slightest.

There are a lot of possibilities. A lot. The world isn't that simple.
That's only a "problem" if you assume human exceptionalism and begging the question. It's completely irrelevant to the actual problem. The human is just a cog in the machine, there is no reason to assume they would ever gain any understanding, as they are not the entity that is generating Chinese.

To make it a little easier to understand:

* go read about the x86 instruction

* take an .exe file

* manually execute it with pen&paper

Do you think you understand what the .exe does? Do you think understanding the .exe is required to execute it?
With LLM's it is just more visible. When the age of "updates" begun, the age of stable software died.
you used the entire phrase "That's all they do." in place of the word just.
I run an above board crawler, but in general crawler traps are relatively easy to work around, especially coming from a big target like Cloudflare, where it really pays off to build a specialized workaround that fingerprints and avoids the trap. Cloudflare's strength is arguably that they have enough traffic data they don't have to rely on stuff like this, they can gather statistics and identify bot patterns in ways smaller actors can not.

It's trickier when you have 10,000 different webmasters inventing their own solutions to do sabotage crawlers, where the juice isn't worth the squeeze when it comes to implementing individual workarounds.
Yes, agreed. I just ressurected an old code base that I had never finished, as I really couldn't be bothered to test it properly. It would have been several weeks or even months doing this thankless task in my spare time, so wasn't going to happen.

Just for fun, I asked the AI assistant in IntelliJ (free trial) to write most of the tests for me. I was actually blown away. The tests were largely really good. In many cases they were more thorough than I would have bothered with. Even when it didn't manage to write good tests on its own, the AI complete as I was writing them myself was incredibly useful. Most of the time it would predict the line I was going to write next, just press tab to accept.

I did have to review the tests, and there were a few minor mistakes I had to correct. The entire process took about 4 hours - and I was trying it out for the first time.

So this is a massive time saver for me, and lets me take on coding in future I would simply not have had the patience to complete.
Not yet on that front, rather voice actors, artists producing digital assets on games, iconography for applications, decorating motives for clothing and furniture.

On IT industry specially, I think LLMs generating code are going to become as transformative as compilers were to Assembly developers.

Yes, currently they still go through "generate language XYZ" as intermediary step, however they eventually will improve to the point, that intermediary step will no longer be needed.

And like the Assembly developers that deemed to manually assess the machine code generated by compilers and scoffed at the generated output, eventually had to cope with optimising compilers turning their knowledge into a niche field, same will happen with common programming languages.

Yeah sure, there will be some Compiler Explorer kind of way to see how the AI maps its decisions to e.g. RISC-V Assembly, but only those in the know will bother looking into it, either by curiosity or need.

Some current examples ongoing trends, more specifically IT, in enterprise consulting, we have evolved to less coding, more plumbing, where existing SaaS products get integrated with each other, mostly via configuration, or integration scripts.

Well turns out, some of those common patterns can be used to teach AIs, and let them automate integrations, instead of manually write them by hand.

https://blog.hoyack.com/top-7-tools-for-effective-agent-orch...

Do they work as well as the sales pitch?

Not yet, those optimising compilers also took a couple of decades to get right, still miss some stuff like auto-vectorization, however the job of Assembly programmer is for all practical purposes gone.
Linux took over the world (without anyone noticing)
It's the same in the West, just under a more subtle form.
You cannot speak, talk and read about all topics.

In France for example, lot of topics will directly cause you legal and social troubles.

There is no freedom of speech like in the US, and as a result the information flow is filtered.

If you don't follow popular opinion, you will lose the state support, the TV channels can get cut (ex: C8), you can get fired from your job, etc.

It's subtle.

Even here, you get flagged, downvoted, and punished for not going with the popular opinion (for example: you lose investment opportunities).

ChatGPT and Gemini, have you seen how censored they are ?

Gemini you ask them societal questions and it will invent excuses not to answer.

Even Grok is censored, and pushes a pro-US political stance.

On the surface, it may seem that Grok is uncensored because it can use bad words like "shit", "fuck", etc, but in reality, it will not say anything illegal, and when you are not allowed to say something because it is illegal just to say these words, that's one of the definition of information control.
i stopped using onenote 2 years ago when i realise it is doomed to be killed by microsoft :)
Answer to the titular question:

The study, which put 2,190 believers into conversation with the GPT-4 model that underpins the chatbot, reduced the self-reported strength of their beliefs by 20% after three rounds of conversation. One in four participants disavowed their beliefs entirely.

And a very interesting result from another study.

an analysis published in August by researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison suggests the debunking messages posted by medical experts on TikTok are *more effective if overlaid with high-tempo music.*
What are you on about? It's happening everywhere, in all companies. It's literally impossible to miss and how to handle the massive increase in code output is becoming a well-known problem. I think it's interesting how the naysayers claim that it's not happening, yet simultaneously worry about the large amount of low-quality code being produced.
I wondered if that might be the case - thank you for the correction!
Do we really need questions as headlines?

It's bad enough that people fail to contextualize or deeply consider the reality behind sensational headlines, but when you open the door to vague questions as headlines, you are somehow journalistically allowed to memetically plant a known lie into the zeitgeist of the majority of internet users who read the headline but dont click to read the article.
Lonely Planet. In 2013 we've done a Morocco backpacking trip with just a Lonely Planet guide - no phones, no Internet access, no pre-booked accomodation or transport. The guide contained maps, hostel suggestions, POI, transport options and a lot more. This year we brought the newest LP release to Thailand, and it was mostly useless - no transport or accommodation info, bad maps, generic POI descriptions. We are not buying another LP guide.
According to https://caniuse.com/?search=webgpu I should be able to use Edge and Opera, but neither works; I'm on Linux Mint, if that makes a difference
Curiously, the things I search most often are not located in files: calendar, photo content/location, email, ChatGPT history, Spotify library, iMessage/whatsapp history, contacts, notes, Amazon order history
"Cregit" tool might be of interest to you, it generates token-based (rather than line-based) git "blame" annotation views: https://github.com/cregit/cregit

Example output based on Linux kernel @ "Cregit-Linux: how code gets into the kernel": https://cregit.linuxsources.org/

I learned of Cregit recently--just submitted it to HN after seeing multiple recent HN comments (yours being one I've had open in a tab for a week to remind me! :) ) discussing issues related to line-based "blame" annotation granularity:

"Cregit-Linux: how code gets into the kernel": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43451654
Hence why the article does not say that the vaccine conferred protection against dementia, but rather that it appeared to confer protection.
But 95% of them are incompetent and even mock you when you try to solve autoimmune-like issue with food, insiste food has nothing to do with it.

My experience as well. I didn't have an autoimmune disease.

But I had chronic fatigue, out of breath abnormally fast when exercising, really bad breath. These were all resolved after years and years of misdiagnosis. Turns out, I had an H.pylori infection. A special round of antibiotics solved my suffering after many years. I probably saw 10+ doctors and specialists and none of them could diagnose me. One day after doing some research, I insisted that the doctor give me an endoscopy and they found the infection.

I generally have little to no trust in their ability to diagnose non-obvious diseases.
> The rental company immediately bills you for the fine

...just to find out the card is blocked :)
We know that poverty, high mortality, lack of education and lower social and legal status for women are factors contributing to net population growth. We also claim to be interested in fixing these problems globally - even the most zealous defenders of capitalism are quick to cite statistics intended to demonstrate a decline in global poverty.

On the other hand we have people panicking about population decline because 1) our economy (including many pension systems) is built on the obviously unsustainable paradigm of infinite growth and 2) some people have very unhealthy feelings about the relative proportions of arbitrary demographic groups because of race essentialist bunk-science that is still being regurgitated by people who benefit from sowing division along those lines to distract from themselves.
You say debunked then link to an article that starts:

>The peopling of the Americas began when Paleolithic hunter-gatherers (Paleo-Indians) entered North America from the North Asian Mammoth steppe via the Beringia land bridge, which had formed between northeastern Siberia and western Alaska due to the lowering of sea level during the Last Glacial Maximum (26,000 to 19,000 years ago).

That is what is common knowledge afaik. What has been debunked?
Yeah, and by not participating directly yourself you just earned a tag of "non-conformist", "weirdo" or perhaps "entity that has something to hide".
If we had no emotional attachment to specific recipes, shapes, colors, textures of food, we'd plausibly move away from "of course something must die" quite fast. We have the tech to produce a nutrient dense food from "thin air", from waste, from any number of things that do not require destroying sentient or non-sentient life. Notable in the press was https://solarfoods.com but that's just one example of many.

Still, there is a clear and significant distinction between killing sentient life (most animals) and non-sentient life (plants or mushrooms), and there are very few people here who could not feasibly switch to the latter.
Hah!

> “That’s all they do” and “just” are interchangeable

That's a valid point, thanks. I could have stated what I was saying more effectively. I just (edit: heh, "just.") meant that, definitionally, LLMs are token predictors, and saying so doesn't belittle them any more than it avoids some unpleasant reality; it is the reality, to the best of my understanding.
A moment's logical thinking demonstrates it. "Scientific papers" are not the currency of correctness.
> They are, indeed, calculators.

And that's relevant exactly how? Do you think "thought and expression" are somehow uncomputable? Please throw science at that and collect your Nobel prize.
It isn’t even physically continuous. There are multiple mechanisms to rebuild, resync, reinterpret, etc the reality. Because our vision is blurry, sound has low speed in the air, and nerves aren’t that fast either. Even the internal clarity and continuity is likely a feeling, the opposite being “something wrong with me”, space/time teleports, delays and loops and other well-known effects that people may have under influences. You might jump back and forth in time perception-wise by default all your life and never notice it because the internal tableau said “all normal” all the way.
"Cregit" tool might be of interest to you, it generates token-based (rather than line-based) git "blame" annotation views: https://github.com/cregit/cregit

Example output based on Linux kernel @ "Cregit-Linux: how code gets into the kernel": https://cregit.linuxsources.org/

I learned of Cregit recently--just submitted it to HN after seeing multiple recent HN comments discussing issues related to line-based "blame" annotation granularity:

"Cregit-Linux: how code gets into the kernel": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43451654

Of course, in your situation I guess such a tool would only help if other people use it. :D
I think there’s a balance. It’s too easy to say “let’s not regulate anything, they could exaggerate”, it’s intellectually very comfortable. Germany blocked some putin disinformation site for example, and they were right in my opinion.
American refers to people from the USA. Canadians rightly bristle when called Americans.
I worked for Jay Smith, the inventor & CEO of the company that made the Vectrex, after the Vectrex was already off the market. I wrote PlayStation 1 games at his company, where Jay is also the guy that basically invented realistic physics for bowling games. We wrote the Tiger Woods PGA Golf game with the South Park scandal at Adrenalin Interactive (Jay's company.)
More than 30 million people live in poverty in the US, and eggs are a dietary staple of children in those households.

Would you recommend they should eat (Little Debbie snack) cake, instead?
We're working on fixing that part though.
Honestly, out of all the human activities that are being lost by the overextension of smartphones in all the corners of our lives, typewriters are not the ones I'll miss.

I know a lot of people like their feel (I do as well), but it must have been distracting as hell to be in an office with all that background noise. I agree with C. S. Lewis as well that writing on something that makes noise disturbs your natural writing rhythm.
Empty Clip, a 2D role-playing shooter game from 2006, ported for the web
Original source: https://gitlab.com/empty-clip/code

My fork: https://github.com/midzer/empty-clip/tree/emscripten

Needs WebGL2!
Is there any offering you think should be blocked? Or do you think everything should be allowed? Child porn, disinformation attempting to destabilise a democracy, …?
Thank you for that insightful comment! "Starting small, research and scale then" is really a pattern often overlooked these days. I wish you all the best for your future endeavours.
Just an aside while I think about what you wrote: John Watts' Blindsight and Echopraxia are phenomenal sci-fi novels that deal with these issues.
I would agree if the article was an example of Betteridge's law of headlines [0], but in this case it is legitimately reflecting the overall message of the article, which is that it is becoming an open research question in science whether viruses trigger Alzheimer's having previously been a fringe hypothesis.

The very fact that the last sentence of the article is expressed as a conditional is also consistent with the use of a question for the headline:

> 'If antiviral treatments can indeed slow, delay or prevent even a small subset of these cases, the impact could be tremendous.'

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines
Tsundoku: The art of buying books and never reading them (2018)
Those suggestions — that livestock can be a key component for carbon sequestration — have so far all been proven wrong. Just a recent publication in an ever growing list of many disproving the hypothesis: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2404329122
This is a well known photoshopped image by NASA.

The aurora was added to the following photo, taken on April 21, 2014:
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap140517.html