skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thank you for commenting here. Your opinion weighs a lot for many of us.
It was my understanding that after extensive investigation there was found to be no classified material shared on that server - which checks out since emailing classified information is pretty uncommon outside of SIPRNET and the like
Well, it has to be _some_ value, right? I mean, if we were in a universe where it was 20% greater, you would be asking the same questions.
You wouldn't say that manufacturing tires is purposeless just because the tires need to be replaced in a few years. They were able to accomplish a lot of transportation while they lasted.

You wouldn't say that making a sandwich is pointless just because you'll need another one tomorrow. It let you survive and gave you the energy to do things.

The purpose of a server is what it was able to do for people while it lasted. The fact that it won't last forever doesn't take away that purpose.
Is the Honeymoon over for Neobanks?
In a friends/family compound that is subdivided, you need a covenant on the original deeds that controls what happens when a member wants to sell their lot, e.g. the existing members collectively have to approve the buyer, or have right of first refusal to buy back the property, etc

Otherwise what starts as a family compound will eventually just become a “normal” neighborhood of strangers.

Subdivided family compounds are one of the extremely rare cases where you actually want a deeded homeowners association.
It's technically public record and is available for your review.

Both men are highly educated and had no prior records which is why they've been able to fight their cases. one is a Yale/Harvard mathematician and actually worked for the Lincoln & Draper Labs where he alleges Epstein was funding the lie-detector cheating research. The other had been a research fellow with MIT Energy Initiative and was at the Media Lab when Epstein was funding them.

So judge for yourself...
> To get this going, we had to buy 1 home, not 6 of them

You had to buy land for six, though?

This side of the pond buying (vacant) land to build one family home would run well into six figures (USD $$$,$$$ where the first digit is definitely a 2 and if you're unlucky it's higher still) - then you have to finance the house(s) on top.
Well that ansible job was quickly ran, buhbye atop. Very concerning coming from Rachel and not some rando. I know a number of fortune 5's that use atop for troubleshooting as well. So as others have commented if you had this baked into images or loaded with puppet etc than now may be the time to cleanup.
I don't see why system wide dns caching would be of use?

How many different programs in the same process space hit so many common external services individual caching of names is not sufficient?

Article lists a bunch of fun with systemd running junk in containers that seem counterproductive to me.
A lot of systemd stuff seems to be stuff useful on a laptop that ends up where it's really not wanted.

Local dns caching seems like a solution looking for a problem to me. I disable it whereever I can. I have local(ish) dns caches on the network. But not inside
lxc containers or Linux hosts.
Opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-852_c07d.pdf starts on page 4
How about for aliases?

import foo from '@Schemas/foo.ts' won't work since it is not a 'RelativeImport'. Is there a fix for this use case?
New Container Runtime Styrolite
I love that the "new" way to use React Router just says "Most projects start with a template"... and then gives no installation instructions for adding it to an existing project beyond looking at an already configured one: https://reactrouter.com/start/framework/installation
> The official methods for self-hosting Next.js require running the application in a stateful way, as long-running servers. While technically possible, this is very hard to operate in any real-world production environment where a single instance isn’t sufficient.

Come on, this is a patently false statement.

There's nothing inherently stateful about Next.js deployment, and self-hosting is both thoroughly documented and straightforward: https://nextjs.org/docs/pages/building-your-application/depl...

If you've worked with any modern deployment pipeline, you'd know self-hosting Next.js is no more complex than any other React application. You build it, you deploy it, you scale it with standard practices.

For many teams with existing infrastructure, self-hosting is actually simpler than migrating to a platform like Vercel. This kind of misinformation reads like someone who either hasn't actually tried self-hosting or has some agenda against the approach.

> The setup needs to be able to dynamically scale up very quickly in order to handle sudden bursts of traffic, while at the same time being able to scale down to zero in order to be cost-effective.

This is obviously a non-issue with the vast majority of deployed apps as a even a single nextjs instance will be able to trivially handle thousands of requests per second.
For anyone else reading personally ceiling APs can't be overstated. My father-in-law is crazy about internet, but I've realized he was crazy like a fox when we did our to-the-studs renovation. He treated APs like a fire alarm or a CO monitor: one per room.

My brother-in-law thinks he's crazy, and obviously it only really works if it is practical to run the wire and you can afford the number, but for my relatively small house it is insane how little I think about my internet. It is one of those quality of life things I never would have realized with having someone come and do it for me.

I guess the only thing is some of the ceilings get a little crowded with lights + fire alarm + CO alarm + HVAC in/out + AP, so for small rooms it can be a challenge to figure out where to put things. But in that case I mean ... you don't need one per room. My father-in-law is crazy like a fox ... but he's also a little crazy like a crazy person.
> So a fancy trailer park basically?

No, not at all.
I don’t know why it’s so hard for devs to stop for 30 seconds and answer the question “why does this commit exist?” That’s the question you’re going to ask when you find the commit in `git blame`, so just answer it.
>A degree is ultimately just a piece of paper

Would you be comfortable visiting a doctor who didn't have their "piece of paper"?

Obviously a degree is not a guarantee of skill or knowledge. No one is saying it is. However, a degree is a very strong indicator that the person is above some minimum level of knowledge.

The counterpoint of "there are shitty lawyers with degrees" is ridiculous. Remove the requirements and those same people would still be shitty lawyers -- you've just lowered the floor so that even more shitty lawyers can practice.
Reminds me of https://latenightcommits.com/
Pod of Dolphins Greets NASA Astronauts
If I ever meet any, I’ll make sure to ask.
not a satisfactory version, from what I saw posted here yesterday.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43475314
No. Apartment buildings are little bricks stacked together into a larger structure. In the original example, individual houses are spaced close together, they have the feel of a trailer park.

These two living environments have in common that they are one—to two-person places to sleep, cook, and watch videos. Everything else that makes life interesting has to be done somewhere else. There are no gardens, no workshops for CNC machines and 3d printers, and no space for outdoor recreational equipment like kayaks, paddleboards, bikes, etc.

I can concede I am biased, and I'm blessed by being able to afford a property with a garden of about 2,000 square feet. I'm looking to expand it by another 500 square feet this year. My basement is just half full with my workshop and home lab; the other half is my partner's art studio.

There was a recent discussion on HNN about developers who quit their jobs to start a farm or otherwise leave the tech world behind, but I do a version of that in the small. I am content to hang around the house and garden, relax outside, watch birds, and occasionally hike in neighboring State Parks.
Wife bought a Saddleback Leather wallet for me. I suspect a grandson will inherit it. I wish I could afford other products of theirs. The leather is thick enough that even if a stitch came out, I figure it'd be worth having repaired.

A wallet that only lasts 10 years seems disposable at this point.
The Uncanny Keyboard (2020)
https://archive.ph/mrXc7
GDP of Mississippi and Bavaria, Germany are about the same.

You would be simply insane to think that Bavaria wasn't far far wealthier than Mississippi though.

This doesn't show the limits of either the US or European ways of life but rather GDP itself as a figure. It has it's uses but that's it. Lay people are far too dependent on GDP as a meaningful indicator of wealth. Professional economists use a variety of metrics to compare and contrast different areas and systems.
Apologies, I worded my question wrong. I should have asked if that "Was not that the case?"

My memory was that the hello world, "starter" project, was to create a "Next.js" application at some point. I see, now, that they have https://react.dev/blog/2025/02/14/sunsetting-create-react-ap... documenting that they don't recommend any "starter" path. That somewhat surprises me, but I couldn't say it shocks me.
I think a competent 5yro could make a better pelican on a bicycle than that. Which to me feels like the hallmark of AI.

I mean, hell, I have drawings from when I was eight of leaves and they are botanically-accurate enough to still be used for plant identification, which itself is a very difficult task that people study decades for. I don't see why this is interesting or noteworthy, call me a neo-luddite if you must.
I'm not going to argue for or against it, but it's literally not a Ponzi scheme. There's no need for infinite growth for it to function, it can work at equilibrium.
These are great and common regrets in house wiring. I'm actually recording a video series on this exact topic right now. There are some things in electrical that are so easy and cheap to do but just get skipped over. Electricians are typically very very cheap (in a good for you the consumer way). However this tends to lead to under-building in a modern tech house.
Don't ask me, I don't believe it will happen :) I think the deterrence to war between nuclear superpowers is the idea that both sides are capable of fighting that war. China and the US both have the industrial capacity to fight against each other, so they will not fight, there's too much to lose. But in MAGA's opinion, the US is losing the industrial capacity to fight said war because US manufacturing is not as common as in the past. What they ignore is that there is a big difference between making cheap steel and making an F-35. Any country can make steel, but only the US can make an F-35.
Near the top of the "Learn More" page:

https://www.intelrealsense.com/depth-module-d421/

Right under the top picture of the module it says "Recommended range 0.2 to 2m" meanwhile on the main page linked from HN is says "Ideal Range 60cm to 6m"

So 60cm on the front, but one click away on "Learn More" link, it drops by a factor of 3.
> failed apocalypse cult

See also the additional New Testament citations I compiled in "Is Jesus Coming Again? The Predictors' Track Record Doesn't Inspire Confidence" [0]

(Some of the comments there are mildly amusing.)

[0] https://www.questioningchristian.com/2005/10/is_jesus_coming... (2005; self-cite)
> Lets not forget the OpenAI benchmarks saying 4.0 can do better at college exams and such than most students. Yet real world performance was laughable on real tasks.

That's a better criticism of college exams than the benchmarks and/or those exams likely have either the exact questions or very similar ones in the training data.

The list of things that LLMs do better than the average human tends to rest squarely in the "problems already solved by above average humans" realm.
Since this is California law, it helps tremendously in places like LA which were built as large suburban SFH neighborhoods but have long exhausted all free space. Building denser housing within existing SFH neighborhoods will help to alleviate the housing crisis.
If you look at buildings from before WW2 in NYC vs buildings from the last few decades, one thing that stands out is the balconies. Older suburban houses are similar, with large porches prewar and no porches or enclosed porches in the last few decades. Our architecture has simply evolved out of having spaces where we can sit around and chat with our neighbors.

I admire the tenacity of the OP. If you look at the pictures, they're occupying a space that is clearly unfriendly to their goals.

In cities, I think a lot of the motivation for this change is anti-homeless sentiment: good places to hang out and chat with your neighbors are also good places for homeless people to sleep. But this contributes to increasingly isolating residents as well. It's one of the subtle ways in which the war on the homeless has negatively impacted those in homes as well.
This is great!

As a renter that is priced out of the market where I want to live/work, the greatest obstacle I've seen to long term communities are "transplants" or those who live for a few years and move. It is difficult living in a community where the overwhelming majority of your neighbors are all cycled in 5 years. We've found "transplants" are effectively anonymous :/
I think the fundamental problem is that next.js is trying to do two things at once. It wants to a) Be fast to load for content that is sensitive to load speeds (SEO content, landing pages, social media sharable content, etc). It also wants to support complex client side logic (single page app, navigation, state store, etc). Doing those two things at the same time is really hard. It is also, in my experience, completely unnecessary.

Use minimal html/css with server side rendering (and maybe a CDN/edge computing) for stuff that needs to load fast. Use react/vue/whatever heavy framework for stuff that needs complex functionality. If you keep them separate, it's all very easy. If you combine them, it becomes really difficult to reason about.
I used to work for a huge email sender (constant contact). Our mail servers needed to perform an absurd number of lookups while receiving and validating mail. When I was there, we used dnscache, running locally, on all our mail servers. But even with a local dnscache, the overhead of making DNS requests and handling their responses was high enough that adding nscd made a noticeable improvement in CPU usage.
This is the real trick, and then you realize you can multiply both sides by one hundred, and you end up with the commutative property of math:
XY = YX
> godless people did to it what the Pharisees did to the other system.

Oops, sorry about that.
Every component of a deep neural network is understood by many people, it's the interaction between the numbers trained that we don't always understand. Likewise, I would say that we understand the components on a CPU, and the instructions it supports. And we understand how sets of instructions are scheduled across cores, with hyperthreading and the operating system making a lot of these decisions. All the while the GPU and motherboard are also full of logical circuits, understood by other people probably. And some (again, often different) people understand the firmware and dynamically linked libraries that the users' software interfaces with. But ultimately a modern computer running an application is not through and through understood by a single human, even if the individual components could be.

Anyway, I just think it's fun to make the thought experiment that if we were here 40 years ago, discussing today's advanced hardware and software architecture and how it interacts, very similar arguments could be used to say we should stick to single instructions on a CPU because you can actually step through them in a human understandable way.
Next.js is secretly a paid framework designed to be run on Vercel, masquerading as open source, and somehow they did it in a way where even the most popular YouTubers continue to shill for them as it being the "best" framework.
US closes subsidiary loophole on Chinese entity list members
The complexity is that it's not a drawing : It's SVG.
So it's code that must, in the end, display a pelican, so it's one step further.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Two_Cultures

When I was homeschooling my son I got him between 2-3 grades above grade level at math. He was so good at mental arithmetic that I had to improve my skills to keep up with him. On the other hand I was not able to get him to do algebra at all and he did not master it in high school although he did OK with geometry.

From my viewpoint it was really puzzling, almost like he had some kind of psychological resistance or mental block to the whole idea of algebra.
Give it another year and we will have a more specialised architecture tailored to 3D that will reach similar accuracy. VGGT is a ground-breaking research but it is in a way brute-force. There is plenty of work to do to make it more efficient.
Well it's interesting - many LLM researchers reject "hallucination" in favour of the term "confabulation" but I'll double down and say that I still don't like either as they are both terms from clinical psych and I'll include a quote from an article[1] interviewing Usama Fayyad (executive director of Northeastern’s Institute for Experiential AI)

'''
“I could say — these models hallucinated; or, to be more precise, I could say, well, the model made an error, and we understand that these models make errors,” Fayyad says.
'''

For years we called the behaviour that researchers now call "hallucination" test error or misprediction or a failure to forecast correct outputs based on "out-of-sample" inputs and those terms were accurate and would still be accurate to use on today's LLM models.

Metaphors are great but can be misleading, people don't often make an argument that a computer mouse can feel pain.

[1] https://news.northeastern.edu/2023/11/10/ai-chatbot-hallucin...
It is taken as flatly impossible that parking would be reclaimed for other uses?
> people would own a relatively small quantity of clothes (compared to today), which they'd wear for a long time. That just wouldn't be a tenable strategy given modern quality.

I think the point being made by the OP is that it might be a tenable strategy if you were to spend an equivalent portion of your income on said clothes - which would be ‘very expensive’ by modern standards.
I agree with everything you've said here. I've scanned it many times myself, and it's obviously brilliant. I probably just chose my words poorly.

What I meant was that "Stopping by Woods" is so widely read that I wanted to share a few other poems that don't get as much attention.
Now you get the privilege of paying a mortgage to live in a Hooverville.
Meanwhile senior devs just commit with "fix" and get the job done. Context is important, and I doubt an LLM can adapt to internal culture as well as a developer that takes 30 seconds to write the commit themselves.
llama.rs, of course /s
Back when I was too broke to afford a lawyer, my favorite part of traffic court the couple times I went was all the people video calling in from the local jail who are in jail because they didn't pay tickets they couldn't afford and then inform the court that no they still can't pay them because they are in jail.
We've had a problem for a very long time that kids are convinced that school is 1) not worth it, 2) not necessary, and often 3) a waste of time and in some cases 4) harmful to them.

I think we should take a look at the education system and figure out how to make it better align with what actually interests kids instead of trying to force them to learn what we think suits them.

Most kids would get off their phones if school was interesting to them. Sure, you'll always have bad apples.

Rather than trying to shove a square peg into a round hole, we should realize there's a mismatch and try to correct it.

Phones are a problem, but they aren't THE problem.

School itself is the problem, and has been for a VERY long time.
How does that relate to anything I said?
Nope, it can.

Got it in two requests, https://chatgpt.com/share/67e41576-8840-8006-836b-f7358af494... for the prompts.
I mean, if the cartel with their automatic weapons come at you, do you really think your stash is going to protect you?

Also, lack of police services is probably commensurate with the low levels of taxation that so many Americans desperately want and vote for.
People with Parents with Money
PHP and Laravel (free starter kits, stable.)

Python and Django (SaaS Pegasus is a good paid boilerplate, complete with a standalone React frontend example.)
Banker.com has a YouTube short going over the big picture of this article - https://www.youtube.com/shorts/NwenCxDPxMM
Financial Times apologizes after mistake accusing Tesla of "missing" 1.4B
This is where you have to be smart about parking. Building small houses like that, raised up so you can park a car underneath, gets dual use out of the same square footage. While you are at it, orient the building properly so that installing PV panels on the roof makes sense. Now we have three uses for the same square footage.
1. Rust has had 10x better tooling right from the start. Cargo vs SBT, no joke.

2. Rust has improved its compiler performance by >3x in the last 5 years.

3. Rust hasn't gotten any major new language feature in the last 6 years. Most language improvement is improving orthogonality of existing features.

4. Rust has an excellent backwards compatibility story also right from the start. Code/libraries written in 2015 can be still compiled and used together with code from 2025.

5. Rust has a serious backing from all major IDE / editor providers.

6. Rust has integrates easily with other languages and ecosystems. It's easier to call Rust from Python than to call Scala from Python. It's easier and more performant to call C from Rust than to call C from Scala. Things like that. It's sad that Scala even struggled with interoperability with Java; which should theoretically be easy as it is the same platform.

Seriously, doesn't look to me like the same mistakes.
It's actually quite opposite.
Lots of the modern world still line-dries laundry, but this is exceedingly uncommon in the USA.
This comment also illustrates why many have an issue with Americans.

“We’re rich” is not a reasonable defense against hurting people, yet it is consistently what Americans choose as their defense.
This is pretty sad. It's a policy that makes no meaningful impact, yet grounds the federal government in that they can do anything they want.
The "group of friends or families living together" is probably the least likely application of this legislation. It main goal seems to be increasing the housing density of residential areas, so investors can buy a single plot of land, develop the property, and sell up to ten houses. Which I guess is the intended purpose, giving investors a more socially productive way to get profits than speculating with limited pre-existing real state.
> I think a lot of criticism of Scala comes from the functional paradigm.

Which functional paradigm. There are at least two in common usage in the Scala community. Odersky's vision was an ML style FP. And now ML patterns are common in modern PLs.