skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is most definitely not the same thing. The indexing requirements are not "This site must be an independent or personal site", it's "This site must lean towards being a plain HTTP document".

The Search My Site, from what I can tell, has the goal of surfacing personal/independent websites, while Wiby has the goal of surfacing minimally styled documents.

Two different goals.
humans are potentially harmed when developers use an unsigned int as a counter and it rolls to zero. Or a byte, in the case of medical radiation machines.

I guarantee if you had access to a full nntp text dump from this era you'd find some "harm"

Intel is dead, long live Intel.
Yes. Ubsan you should probably also turn on in production.
They removed all the women several weeks ago.
Building an App Opener MCP Server for macOS
I think you might have missed OPs point being about acoustically sending data rather than using bluetooth/WiFi.

If someone is close enough to your home to listen to your washing machine (or more likely, inside) they can probably hear/see you more directly.
My grandfather, on the other hand, was a gold miner in Alaska, then returned to Seattle in the 1920s just in time for the Great Depression. So I’m just a bit older than you ;)
Another option to consider is splitting the company into two, each having a minority stake in the other and a cross-licencing agreement on the tech and letting each go in different directions.

I wouldn't recommend it but could be something to consider.
I've seen plenty of these cars around Stuttgart and Munich. These patterns make it surprisingly hard to discern details in their shapes. Add to that the fact that early prototypes are deliberately padded to obscure their actual design and there's virtually no way to tell what the final production car will look like when you see these on the road.
BYD Sales Top Tesla as Tech Focus Wins over Chinese Drivers
OLTP Through the Looking Glass 16 Yrs Later: Communication Is the New Bottleneck [pdf]
As the current administration explained, tariffs are intended to offset the tax cut, while the tax cut allows trickle down economics to take place.

If you ignore all the glaring flaws it's a wonderful plan!
That comment seemed a little bit snide to me, so I visited the website just to prove you wrong. Unfortunately, it was so disorienting I had to close it after scrolling for a few seconds :0
That’s never been a blocker for game modding.

- Worms: required a CLI tool to convert SFX

- Doom: WAD files were pkzip format

- Duke3D: came with its own level editor

- Jazz Jack Rabbit 2: also came with its own level editor

- Grand Theft Auto: massive modding community for the original game on PC via unofficial 3rd party hacks

- Minecraft, Roblox, Mario Maker, etc: all have massive communities of user generated content and none of that has been created via notepad.exe.

It would be harder to come up with examples, either modern or retro, where plain text files were the preferred method for modding.
It’s there other way around. Robert Bosch acquired the stake in Siemens. So Bosch owns Siemens.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140923104028/http://www.rttnew...
The largest part of the article is about other/valid reasons not to use Brave though, as reflected in the table of content:

2016 — Brave Browser promises to replace webpage ads

2018 — Brave runs a questionable donation campaign

2020 — Brave injects referral links when visiting crypto wallets

2020 — Brave puts ads in user's home screens

2021 — Brave ships an insecure Tor feature

2023 — Brave hides their crawlers to websites

2024 — So-called "privacy browser" deprecated advanced fingerprinting protection
There are lots of witnesses to bigfoot, too.

It took several years of concerted effort for the Wrights to achieve flight. Is it possible that someone tinkering in a barn could design and build one in one go? Engine, wings, propellor, flight controls, all correctly put together? Where are the remains of his machine? His notebooks?

It's possible that Pearson did it, but highly unlikely. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

I've invented things that I never documented. Other people invented them later, documented it, and got the credit. That's how it works.
Memory safety predates C by a decade, in languages like JOVIAL (1958), ESPOL/NEWP (1961) and PL/I (1964), it follows along in the same decade outside Bell Labs, PL/S(1970), PL.8 (1970), Mesa (1976), Modula-2 (1978).

If anything the cool kids are rediscovering what we lost in systems programming safety due to the wide adoption of C, and its influence in the industry, because the cool kids from 1980's decided memory safety wasn't something worth caring about.

"A consequence of this principle is that every occurrence of every subscript of every subscripted variable was on every occasion checked at run time against both the upper and the lower declared bounds of the array. Many years later we asked our customers whether they wished us to provide an option to switch off these checks in the interests of efficiency on production runs. Unanimously, they urged us not to--they already knew how frequently subscript errors occur on production runs where failure to detect them could be disastrous. I note with fear and horror that even in 1980 language designers and users have not learned this lesson. In any respectable branch of engineering, failure to observe such elementary precautions would have long been against the law."

-- C.A.R Hoare's "The 1980 ACM Turing Award Lecture"

Guess what programming language he is referring to by "1980 language designers and users have not learned this lesson".
I fail to understand the complexity of it, can you help me understand how is it different from other search engines ? Thanks in advance !
I think my point is that a standardization committee is not a government.
"Signs of wealth and prestige, these all-stone buildings were also fireproof, leading to a terrible but effective tactic: take your family, treasures & goods up into your tower then set fire to enemies’ homes and let the city burn around you while you sit safe above. This was VERY BAD for cities."

I'd want to stay as far away as possible from the fire I guess.

Also, it seems to be quite a busy city - presumably they weren't necessarily able to acquire more land to make an actual fortification and are stuck with a fixed perimeter, the only place to go is up.
Huh? Offended?!

Filesystems present a durable way to store hierarchical binary/textual data. They normally have a very well-defined api used to provide a primitive query language. Sounds a lot like a database, no?

Even internally they are very similar: journalling, paging, tree indexes are normally present in typical popular implementations.

In some classic OS-s there is no separation at all between the concepts of a database and a filesystem.

In a way, a generic durable database can be though of as a special kind of a filesystem. And vice versa.
HelenOS is multi-platform. Their certificate expired but from their site:

> HelenOS runs on eight different processor architectures

Pretty sure ARM is one of those.
I guess it’d be like if you only committed once when you release a new product.
Sure, there's one on my Bosch too. But I'm damned if I know how to set it to (for instance) turn on at 7am by using the buttons on the machine. There's probably a way involving multiple button presses. The app does that easily.

But as I said before - not really something I care about either way.
My reasoning for proprietary AI to be associated with communism is that they aren't competing in a free market way where everyone does one thing and do its best. They are simultaneously trying to do all things internally.

For example , Chatgpt etc. self hosts them on their own gpu and they can generate 10tk/s or something.

Now there exists groq , cerebras who can do token generation of 4000 tk/s but they kind of require a open source model.

So that is why I feel its not really abiding by the true capitalist philosophy
It was mostly unforced errors. They tried to compete directly with Microsoft by buying word processors, databases, making a spreadsheet, etc. It was pretty clear to me even at the time.

Microsoft, on the other hand, is severely underrated for its ability to just not fuck up too often.
My dishwasher wasn’t free either.
I’m a bit surprised by that! Can you tell us a little bit more?
Ask HN: Will B2B companies welcome an AI voice bot qualifying their leads?
Yes? which situations?, No? why not?
Sites are ranked higher when they have no ads. Fully open source.

That's a good starting point..
Then who voted into law the current accountability and transparency laws?
> Learn how to not to learn unnecessary things.

Why? These things increase the surface are of attaching other (necessary) things to. Also you don't know what is valuable knowledge in advance, your goals may change in the future.
This kind of projects are really good for finding interesting blogs and obscure sites.

My go to choice is https://marginalia-search.com/
Heh, I’d love to, but we’re small Scandinavian business with not enough revenue to cover salary of such person yet (2-3m isk/mo).
Yes, though what I meant (though neglected to specify) was devoted, conscious study. Young children do not learn language the way adults typically do.
Communication with humans makes us feel better. In absence of actual humans, an LLM trained on human works is better than nothing. However, it is worth remembering, in context of mental health, that it is just that: an aggregate of creative output from various humans, with their own mental warts and all, plus the added complication of ML engineers making it conform to your expectations.
This is what I’m using with my Astro personal blog. It’s awesome.
I was about to say, dazzle camouflage seems just about perfect for doing 3d scanning on, so many nice high contrast areas for measuring stereo disparity!
I agree with you that you shouldnt oust people because of minor discrepancies but on the other side, you absolutely should draw the line somewhere.

The problem that any minority with hateful opposition has, that its subtle in the beginning until enough people normalized it, which is what trump is doing right now. And since you cant look into peoples heads, whether they are able to reason freely or distorted by emotions / biases, you have to measure by proxy.

This is the conflict line you have to draw, and its difficult, yes, but since the overton window moves fast, its needed more then ever. And i guess the mozilla insiders had the best position to observe these little telling moments.
Who knew. The website isn't very accessible to people who brows with JavaScript disabled. I've said my politically neutral piece so now I get on to the more opinionated stuff - you know what that list says to me? It says Brave is actually putting an effort in to competing with Google and they're making the occasional mistake. It looks pretty healthy.

Maybe if Mozilla wasn't so sedated by Google cash they'd be trying things that might disrupt Google's search dominance. There is an amazing germ of an idea in Brave where they push the cost of ownership of a browser from $0 down into the negatives to where you get paid as a user to use Brave. That is a very interesting idea; I'd like a chunk of that advertising money and I think a lot of other people might too.

Brave might not carry the idea to its eventual destination, but there are interesting thoughts there which is more than anything I've heard out of Firefox in the last decade.
I just realized "reproductive freedom" sounds like an emotive conjunction. It isn't about the freedom to reproduce, it's literally the freedom to not reproduce.

I have a very reasoned and nuanced view on this topic that I probably will never share online. I don't know why I didn't notice this weird phrasing before.
Thanks for the inside baseball, it's interesting how it works over there. Some friends have teachers as parents but in my corner of the woods almost all guidelines are given to them, majority of content is always "from the book", and their outside of work activities were mostly grading homework or tests.

It's interesting to me that teaching from the book is discouraged over there, where my feelings are it should be mandatory. It's weird to think there's places where the teacher has so much individual content that might be personal preference to them but not actually work that well.
The US Supreme Court hews close to precedent. The only two significant overturned decisions in the last decade are Roe v Wade, which regardless of your views on abortion was a poorly reasoned decision, which was really judicial legislation, that had to be essentially amended several times (whether abortion should be permitted is a separate question from whether Roe was good law, which it obviously wasn't) and Chevron, which was contrary to the most fundamental principles of the rule of law (that is, that the interpretation of the law is a fundamentally judicial function).

Neither were really political decisions. The SCOTUS doesn't split along ideological or party lines all the time. It often splits in different ways, and often makes decisions on very politically heated topics unanimously. You should have more confidence in it. It is the least bad of your three major institutions of government by far.

To go back to Chevron, you have to look beyond the US and understand that for anyone else anywhere else in the world, the idea of the courts deferring in their interpretation of the law to executive agencies is just ridiculous. It never made any sense. Its result was inevitable: a new government was elected and suddenly the law changed overnight because government departments all published their new "interpretations" of the law. That is just silly, it makes a mockery of the principles of the rule of law, and it gives too much power to the government. Law should be made by parliament (which you call congress, for some reason) and rulemaking powers should be explicitly delegated to executive agencies where appropriate. Vagueness in the law should be interpreted and resolved by the courts, not by the executive in a way that is subject to political whimsy.
I'm not going to minor the merits of Delphi, but this...

> Especially on the web side, where even a single view sometimes requires having multiple unrelated dependencies (packers, builders, transpilers, etc.),

... is only true if you jumped on the SPA bandwagon. Things don't have to be this complicated.
Modula-2, Object Pascal, Oberon specially Oberon-07.

I would say Zig is the spiritual follower from the first two, while Go follows up the Oberon and Limbo heritage.
These wordings are basically a manual description of a diff. They wouldn't be necessary if version control would be used for laws.

I actually think version control is an absolute necessity for laws.
>If taking a stand means sacrificing another 2-4 hours

>Plus, now I have a long-term project to hack my dishwasher.

So you'd rather waste more time, probably days or weeks, on a hack where Bosch can change implementation anytime, than return it?
> It seems that the Wright brothers did not fly in public until well after Santos-Dumont had.

That's correct. The Wrights were secretive because they wanted to ensure they had the patents locked up before disclosure. But they were smart about ensuring there was a solid trail of evidence of thier invention.

Santos Dumont did not have 3-axis controls, though. Neither did the European airplanes that were developed. At one point, the Wrights crated their flyer and went to Europe to demonstrate it. The European airplanes were very difficult to turn (because there were no roll controls). The Wrights just blew them all away by flying in tight, controlled graceful circles.

The Europeans immediately redesigned their machines to incorporate roll control.
The "software development community" isn't going to do shit, quite frankly, as long as bean counters rule the world. The businesses will keep hardening their equipment (or paying someone to do it poorly), and they'll threaten to sue anyone who attempts to free the hardware.

Some things that are already wildly out of control cannot be fixed from within. We can only hope that regulation and government influence could stop the waterfall. Or, a good old fashioned tea party (if that would even have the slightest effect nowadays).
in a dense city you also have to take into account the height of the neighboring towers too - you don't want to be showered with arrows and later musket balls from a higher tower near by - thus race to the top :)
No it absolutely doesn't. The "permanent bureaucracy" as you call it (or people just doing their jobs as I call it) is the most compliant part of government to checks and balances.
Boeing seeks to withdraw guilty plea deal in deadly crashes of 737 MAX jets
That is false, these costs are financed through debt.
No it wasn't, this keeps being wrongly repeated.

Both had layout managers, they just required a bit more effort to use, and developers as we know are all lazy.
Don't forget that GitHub also shows interactions (comments on MRs etc., creating documentation) in the Graph.
> "Law XYZ, Paragraph 5a, Sentence 3 is changed to read as follows: '...', Sentence 7 is appended with '...', Sentence 8 is removed"

That is basically a manual description of a git diff.
Great to see this.

Ironically, given Google's stronghold over the past decade, I strongly feel that one of the big winners in the AI space is going to be the backend search engine.

Modern web search has become so polluted, with many tricks to get to the front page of Google that a lot (most?) of the good content is lost.

Now that many of the big models are capable of calling out to the web, this bloat is now appearing in AI search. A proper data first engine, without ads, less focus on presentation, and more on structured data is what is needed.
Scaling Hiring with AI: How MokaHR Automates Recruitment
Hiring is broken. Many companies still rely on outdated processes—manual resume screening, endless email chains, and chaotic interview scheduling. At MokaHR, we believe recruitment should be as streamlined as modern software development. That’s why we built Moka Recruiting, an AI-powered applicant management system designed to automate hiring and eliminate inefficiencies.

Why an Applicant Management System Matters
In a hyper-competitive job market, speed and accuracy in hiring are critical. The cost of a bad hire is high, but so is the opportunity cost of a slow process. Moka Recruiting automates the most time-consuming parts of recruitment—resume screening, interview scheduling, and applicant tracking—so HR teams can focus on hiring great talent instead of wrestling with logistics.

How AI Improves Hiring
Automated Screening: Our AI scans and ranks resumes in real time, ensuring top candidates don’t slip through the cracks.

Intelligent Scheduling: No more back-and-forth emails—our system syncs with calendars to auto-schedule interviews.

Data-Driven Decision Making: Built-in analytics help track hiring trends, measure conversion rates, and optimize recruitment strategies based on real-time insights.

Enhanced Candidate Experience: Automated communication keeps applicants in the loop, reducing drop-off rates and improving employer branding.

Why MokaHR?
MokaHR isn’t just another ATS (Applicant Tracking System). We leverage cutting-edge AI to make hiring not just easier but significantly more efficient. Companies using Moka Recruiting see reduced time-to-hire, lower hiring costs, and improved candidate quality.

The Future of Hiring
Recruitment shouldn’t be stuck in the past. If your company is still manually screening resumes and struggling with scheduling, it’s time to rethink your process. AI-powered hiring is no longer a luxury—it’s a necessity.

Curious about how MokaHR can optimize your hiring process? Let’s talk.
Btrfs Adding Fast/Realtime ZSTD Compression and Other Performance Optimizations
Winner-takes-all markers are never healthy IMO - it's hardly a market when the winner took all.

What I love about "open" models in general and Deepseek in particular, is how they undermine that market. Deepseek drops especially were fun to watch, they were like last minute plot twists, like dropping some antibiotic into a perti dish filled with bacteria. Sorry, try again with a better moat.

"Open" models are in fact the very thing enabling having a functioning market in this space.
That’s been my observation too. My completely amateur theory is that a young child’s perception of the world - their ability to contextualise what they’re looking at - changes so much that even if those old memories are still hanging around, they don’t really make sense any more. It’s more like a sliding window than a hard cutoff.
Building SubTrackr – A Simple Subscription Tracker for Small Businesses
Hey HN!

I’m currently building SubTrackr, a lightweight subscription tracking SaaS designed for small businesses. The idea is to help companies monitor, manage, and optimize their recurring expenses by connecting bank accounts, categorizing subscriptions, and providing actionable insights.

A bit about me:
I’ve been diving into entrepreneurship and SaaS development, and this is my first SaaS project. I run an e-commerce business (Onyx Vault), have experience with dropshipping and finance, and I’m now looking to build a simple but useful tool that solves a real problem.

Unlike Rocket Money, which focuses on individuals, SubTrackr is tailored for businesses—helping them track software subscriptions, SaaS expenses, and recurring costs with automated reminders and integrations.

Would love to get your feedback! What pain points do you have when managing subscriptions for your business? What features would make a tool like this essential for you?

Excited to hear your thoughts!
Of course, relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/883/
Looking at this picture [1] of Bologna’s skyline from the sixties it seems it could be pretty realistic. The skyline has changed drastically and now you have many more tall buildings that make the remaining tower seems shorter. Also, I think the strangeness of the picture is due to the number of towers, but afaik there were around 100 towers in the city in the 13th century.

[1] https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torri_di_Bologna#/media/File...
Ingress-Nginx CVE-2025-1974: What You Need to Know
Thankfully the teacher is in full control and can(and absolutely should) modify the content and sequencing to make the content shine.

AI is a force multiplier, it won't make a bad teacher a good teacher but it will make a good teacher even better!

It's the same with ai for coding. Will it make anybody a perfect dev? No, but in the right hands it absolutely does a phenomenal job at its strengths which great devs know how to leverage to help them focus on the bits that matter.

>Ugh, it's awful. Sorry OP.

All good, I'm a high school teacher, I have a thick skin :)
The evidence is:

> He asked, 'How do I run this Python script?'" Palmer said, per Crikey.

That is exactly what a programmer would ask, python scripts are not self contained they have a lot of dependencies, also typically you need to invoke them with a lot of parameters.

In addition not all programmers are python programmers, getting some commands you need in order to get started is just run of the mill when you get code from someone.
Is this officially associated with the EU? The only credit I see on the site is for a guy, not an organization.

I wonder why they went with Fedora, given its association with the US company Red Hat.
Yes it did, IDE tooling was the answer, and Netbeans still provides its Matisse, WindowBuilder on Eclipse, and as does InteliJ.

Back in the day, JBuilder offered a Delphi like experience.

What I would agree is that the thing that actually made Swing hard are the defaults, which required books like "Filthy Rich Clients" as gate into making wow Swing applications.