skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The first image, with the photographer holding the phone reflected in the white board.

Angle of incidence = angle of reflection. That means that the only way to see yourself in a reflective surface is by looking directly at it. Note this refers to looking at your eyes -- you can look down at a mirror to see your feet because your feet aren't where your eyes are.

You can google "mirror selfie" to see endless examples of this. Now look for one where the camera isn't pointing directly at the mirror.

From the way the white board is angled, it's clear the phone isn't facing it directly. And yet the reflection of the phone/photographer is near-center in frame. If you face a mirror and angle to the left the way the image is, your reflection won't be centered, it'll be off to the right, where your eyes can see it because you have a very wide field of view, but a phone would not.
The effort required to implement a JS engine and keep trendchasing the latest changes with it is a huge barrier to entry, not to mention the insane amount of fingerprinting and other privacy-hostile, anti-user techniques it enables.

Seeing what used to be simple HTML forms turned into bloated invasive webapps to accomplish the exact same thing seriously angers me; and everyone else who wanted an easily accessible and freedom-preserving Internet.
https://archive.ph/ThrqW
Strange, I power mine when I’m using it.
Nothing is binary, everything is a tradeoff. Her texts didn't mention specifics so presumably anyone eavesdropping wouldn't have been able to identify the exact context. It's reasonable for high level officials to weigh the cost vs benefit. When you're one or two steps away from the president, you have a lot of leeway.
Yep, the idea is older, I have vague memories of reading about it ~twenty years ago, but that video was the first thing I found in google so I went with that rather than overstate the case based on memories.
https://archive.ph/j0IOL
I'm guessing Svelte 5 will last many years. Maybe they'll release v6 to drop old stuff but I don't think the runes paradigm will change any time soon.

Plus they need to invest some serious work onto SvelteKit...
Yeah, you don't discuss war planning over an insecure phone. The OP talked about "in this situation", so no, you don't do that. And at least one member of that Signal chat was in Russia.

When you are one or two steps away from the President, you should be even more careful.
I'm a huge fan of my underprovisioned homelab, squeezing perf out of a tiny old i3 based system is weirdly satisfying. Just one more container, baby! One more transcode stream...
It’s also come to mean the densest part of any city. Even the town I group up in would call the densest part “downtown”, even though the only buildings taller than two stories were city hall and the historic theater.
Up to 5000 IU per day is unlikely to result in a concerningly high level of D3 or calcium in someone with minimal sun exposure. Also, caffeine drains nutrients like calcium away. Those with compromised kidneys will have to be more careful.
Playing to Win by David Sirlin
Thanks, would love to see posts from outside Japan!
It's a pretty big false dichotomy to present "people directly opposed to their policy platforms" as the sole alternative to people "picked on the premise of just one qualification: they'd be Yes Man/Woman".
>At 11:44 a.m., the account labeled “Pete Hegseth” posted in Signal a “TEAM UPDATE.” I will not quote from this update, or from certain other subsequent texts. The information contained in them, if they had been read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly in the broader Middle East, Central Command’s area of responsibility. What I will say, in order to illustrate the shocking recklessness of this Signal conversation, is that the Hegseth post contained operational details of forthcoming strikes on Yemen, including information about targets, weapons the U.S. would be deploying, and attack sequencing.

...

>According to the lengthy Hegseth text, the first detonations in Yemen would be felt two hours hence, at 1:45 p.m. eastern time. So I waited in my car in a supermarket parking lot. If this Signal chat was real, I reasoned, Houthi targets would soon be bombed. At about 1:55, I checked X and searched Yemen. Explosions were then being heard across Sanaa, the capital city.

Literally guaranteed classified information if even the timeline is accurate: If he knew hours in advance of an upcoming strike, they're busted.

Now maybe Goldberg is just a filthy liar and he's making all of this up. Do you really think that? Do you not think he has receipts?
Are we really looking at the best group of people that the current president could find to do these roles that agree with his policy platform? There was no one else with relevant experience willing?
Sorry to be pedantic

> flaunting

I believe you meant to say flouting
It’s Trump’s one true talent.

He got the Supreme Court and the judiciary leaning his way in his first term. Congress is controlled by either his Republican primary candidates, or Republicans who are too afraid to cross him.

Now he’s purging from the federal branch anyone who is not completely ideologically loyal to him. That is the true purpose of Doge.
What legal ramifications?

Are you saying it's a crime for someone else to accidentally add you to their chat?
Huh I vaguely remember hearing that term somewhere... will read up on it, thanks!
Let's drop this. I do agree with you on Musk being a fascist -- or more specifically the average person might be correct in concluding the Musk is a fascist.
Of course it didn't work. At best, the dorks doing this think there's a gamechanging LLM application to justify the insane valuations right around the corner if they just scrape every backwater site they can find. At worst, they're doing it because it's paying good money. Either way, they don't care, they're just going to ignore robots.txt.
1. Unsigned commits is the norm. It's weird to sign git commits. It's weird to upload your gpg key to github. gpg is a nightmare mess.

2. They aren't introducing the bug, those are all unreleased commits, so advice to "uninstall now" for something no distros are shipping would be silly.

3. The diff is trivial, you can read it and figure out if it looks like they're fixing a real exploitable thing. The answer is obviously no.
This story always cracked me up, but SEGA totally got away with it..

https://www.gamespot.com/articles/deee-lite-singer-loses-seg...
No, that was not suggested. You are not arguing in good faith.
Generator, a cistern, and a diy septic system will get you started
RSX-280 for the Z280 CPU:

https://github.com/hperaza/RSX280

Nothing like DOS. Nothing like UNIX.
https://github.com/Atoptool/atop/pull/327 and https://github.com/Atoptool/atop/pull/325 are the PRs with those commits.

Come on.
Some of the people were already set to appear. This was not a scramble to get answers.
I'll add that "sell yourself" has (Unfortunately) negative connotations in a Western context. (Possibly in other contexts as well, but I don't know.)

We teach children modesty. We correct people who brag. We emphasize the "everyone is equal " approach. Which are are correct things to do as children. Children's work is encouraged (regardless of quality) and is discarded.

But this mindset can work against adults. Primarily because the work is expected to be fruitful, not discarded. And for work to be fruitful it must not just be fine, it must be seen.

At my company we have a saying "if it's not documented, it's not done". (I write software libraries.) If I don't write docs, build examples, publicize new features, then no one will use them. That's a waste of my output, and a waste of the money the company spent for me to make it. This is not a "modesty" thing, it's a "that's my job" thing.

Now, can you write code on your own time, stick the result on the fridge, and admire it yourself? Of course yes. You don't have to publicize it. It's perfectly OK to have a hobby. Frankly it doesn't matter if it's good or bad. It'll serve its purpose and be forgotten.

"Selling" in this context may be the wrong word. "Documenting" or "Publishing" would have served a similar purpose without the stigma. But the author wants to stress test there's a "persuasion " aspect here as well.

My library might be better, faster, more secure, and so on, but there are other libraries our there competing for users. If I won't "persuade" others to try it, who will? If I'm not prepared to stand up and advocate for it, what that does that say about my perspective of the work? If I don't believe in it, why should they?

If you don't think your work is worth talking about, so be it. Just don't expect anyone else to talk about it either.
Yes, the scandal here is not just the questionable security. It is also clear intent to circumvent transparency laws which suggests they may be intending to hide the breaking of other laws.
How does it compare to previous work on learning to learn? I don't see it referenced https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.04474
this is incredible!!
> but I’ll often run a tiny subset of those commands (e.g. cargo test) hundreds of time in a single day.

Bacon replaces that command entirely for me (and many other cargo commands which would otherwise be run repetitively). https://dystroy.org/bacon/
thank you smmmmmmmm!!!!
CIA director explained that nothing could have been classified because classification authority rests with the secretaries involved themselves. In the journalists opinion, war plans should be classified. Fortunately, we dont rely on Journalists to make that determination.

Fortunately, good journalists do not harm air missions. Unfortunately, bad journalism creates political illusions.

The journalist said he withheld sensative information that the senate hearing today emphasized was regarding an ongoing investigation, and not about war plans. If the whole government is lying, hopefully the journalist is good and publishes facts instead of opinions

Edit: in your clip, CIA director says 'they characterized it as a mistake', not 'he'.
Thanks I haven't seen that. I take it all back. Maybe they could add a note on their download page.

https://www.haiku-os.org/get-haiku/r1beta5/
I use zsh-histdb, and it's amazing. It shows return statuses and which directory the command was run from.

I honestly can't remember the entire setup, but my dotfiles that have the setup are here:
https://github.com/Hobadee/dotfiles/blob/master/Common/profi...
Yeah, there is a crime defined for intentionally gathering national defense information, and that crime is called "espionage"; while the courts have found constitutional limits beyond what is in the text of the law that restrict when it can be applied, the application of those limits isn't super consistent in practice and the formal boundary could be changed by the courts at any time when the government is pushing it, and a journalist knowingly taking advantage of someone else's mistake to continue gathering such information would not be out of line of the situations in which the government has pursued charges for that in the last decade.
They are values though! That's my whole point! These languages are constructed and written about in a way that often obscures that. A lot of them are simple things like tuple(x: int, y: int, h: x<y). Here's a constructive proof of your proposition:

import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq

example (h: x ≡ 0 [MOD 2]): ¬(x≡1[MOD4]) := λ xeq1mod4 ↦ by
have h24 : 2 ∣ 4 := ⟨2,by tauto⟩
have h' := (h.congr (xeq1mod4.of_dvd h24)).mp (by rfl)
contradiction

You can see at one point, I make a proof that 2|4, which is a data structure that needs to remember that 2 is the solution to 2*n=4 as the proof. Then I pass that to a couple functions (lemmas) that require that assumption, and get an Iff, which is a pair of implications (lambda functions) going each direction. I pull out one of them and call it on a trivial proof of `x=x`. This all gives me a proof that 0=1 mod 2. Finally I can ask it to expand that definition until it reaches a contradiction.

The whole thing is a proof that if you give me a proof that x=0 mod2 and x=1 mod4, I can build you a contradiction. Exactly like you'd expect in a proofs class. Since I'm a programmer, I wrote the whole thing as a big lambda function.

Note that Not[T] is also not some arcane thing. It's just Function[T,Void]. Essentially, it's a function you could never possibly call (because the whole point is that you can't get a T to call it), but if you did, it would just crash the program/throw an exception. It has an obvious purpose if you're trying to formally prove a negative.

The use of a reader monad to get a constructive-ish proof of things that need AC or LEM is just what programmers might call dependency injection. It's a normal pattern (in programming). It only "doesn't mean" something if you don't believe in those axioms at all, but even then many proofs don't need the full axiom and will work if you can bring your own choice function (e.g. you already have a basis for your vector space). Just like many (most?) real world programs basically don't need a turing machine, and actually work fine as a DFA with a trivial event loop or something.

Fwiw, you can easily construct a ¬¬T from a t: T: `λ f↦f(t)` (so make a closure that remembers your t:T and passes it into any ¬T someone gives it). LEM essentially says all ¬¬T are of this form, so you can extract the T that's hidden inside. Sort of like how functionals in finite dimensions are all secretly hiding a vector to do a dot product.
>For starters, this completely blocks generation of anything remotely related to copy-protected IPs

It did Dragon Ball Z here:

https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1jjtcn9/the_new_im...

Rick and Morty:

https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1jjtcn9/the_new_im...

South Park:

https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1jjyn5q/openais_ne...
It was discussed in the video. The OP's electricity is paid by the landlord :P
Trump can't fire any of them. Fox News doesn't have enough TV people to poach. Where else did he find his cabinet from?
Anger someone enough and you'll get a real DDoS instead.
I vaguely remember an old bug in atop, leading to a very unusual consequence.

Atop will do an invalid memory write and crash with a segfault. But this writing is performed on a memory page mapped to a hardware timer. Despite not being able to write into that page, just touching it somehow changes how this hardware timer works. Then, the OS detects that this timer is inaccurate and switches to a different clock source (which you can see in /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource). As a result, every call to clock_gettime becomes slower, and the system becomes slower as a whole until it restarts.

In short, a segfault in atop leads to the whole system's performance degradation. But this was found around maybe 7 years ago.
Of course big corp media like NYT would report on injustices in red states, especially Texas.

Next door to NYT in the deep blue state of Massachusetts, two men have been arrested for simple trespass even though they had valid active IDs. Cops simply took the ID and left it out of police report, and never turned it over to the DA or the defense as exculpatory evidence. All with complete impunity and re-arrested them half a dozen times again repeating the same exact way!

You'd think where gay marriage was first legalized (and has a lesbian governor), plenty lawyers would take such cases. They've had to go through six lawyers because they refused plea bargain deals so that the dirty cops would have to testify under oath. But the corrupt DA dropped each and every charge on the days of trials, to save the cops from perjury; but not until after nearly two years of fake and phony court hearings to make sure these two lose their jobs or give up their rights.

You'll never read their story on the front page of NYT or any other big corp media because it happened right at the heart of Massachusetts in Cambridge/Boston on the precious private property of an elite university.
That's right; but a lot of packages, like Superforms, use stores.
Good reply but it reads far better without the final two sentences, BTW.

<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43456130>
You watched the whole hour?
Steering into the Fiscal Crisis
Not all suburbs are built the same. My dad grew up in suburban Cleveland in the 50s, which has a bunch of some of the very earliest style of suburbs. When I have been there, and from what I remember my dad telling me, there was actually a pretty decent community there despite it being a suburb.

Personally having been there, and also many suburbs in the rest of the US, I think it's more complex than just "typical suburban problems are inherent to the suburban environment". That is to say, very early-style suburbs like Eastern Cleveland, suburbs of major cities like NYC, suburbs of smaller cities like Cincinnati, cities that are almost entirely suburban like LA or San Jose, and very old/organic suburbs like the gold coast of Connecticut are all completely different from each other.

Even within places like Cleveland or New York, the time period in which the suburb formed (50s-60s suburbs are completely different from 2000-2010's suburbs) and the circumstances of how it formed (it could be completely organic and decentralized, totally centralized in a big development project, organized as a purely residential community with hoa fees and gates and community pools/golf clubs, or organized as a natural extension to the city and include spaces for business and schools) make it so that two places can both be suburban but have very different problems.

And then of course you have demographics as a major confounding variable. In suburban Cleveland in the 50s and 60s almost every house was occupied by a nuclear family with school-aged kids, most men were actively employed (mostly unionized blue collar workers in eg steel). But the rust belt happened, people started living longer and stopped having so many kids, upper middle class people started preferring bigger houses, etc. so now that community is significantly more elderly, fragmented, and not really upper-middle-class any more despite the suburb itself not changing much. Similarly, Palo Alto is not really built that differently from many nice parts of Florida, but the culture is completely different from the physically-similar communities in Florida, because one place has lots of upwardly mobile people in tech/finance/affiliated with Stanford, and the other is a retirement destination.

I guess my point is that "suburban problems" are oftentimes just "problems in suburbs" or "a problem in that suburb" or "a problem with that kind of suburb", not "problems with suburbs in general". Suburbs can have a sense of community but their residents need to want that and make it happen.
Great project. Something else, that needs to be said, is that you should not allow others to make you feel ashamed for using programming languages that you like. No reason to succumb to others who are trying to force switching to what they are pushing. It's your project and your time, not theirs.
These are the same folks who scrubbed the Navajo Code Talkers from the DoD web site for being "DEI" or some such.
People Barely Care About Relative Income: Some Empirics
Maybe in an apartment. In a house, you want wired backhaul on access points, and wired streaming devices.
seems a lot better than the art of electronics but it is still not quite there yet. It has to introduce ideas one by one without overwhelming the newbie and it has to start from absolute zero to the point where you can build a microcontroller or something
The title is "Plasmonic Modulators Can Break the Wireless Terahertz Barrier". Let's not make it clickbait. Please edit the post to reflect the true title.
This is yet another great example of the innovation that the AI industry is delivering. Why just limit your scraper bots to GET requests when there might be some juicy data to train on hidden behind that form? There's a reason why the a16z funded cracked vibe coder ninjas are taking over software engineering, they're full of wonderful ideas like this.
I imagine Signal itself is secure enough that it wouldn't be unreasonable for a government to develop a procedure to use it to transmit classified information under certain conditions.

That list of conditions would likely be quite restrictive compared to how we saw it used here. It would certainly include using a dedicated device for classified information, and would forbid taking that device to an unfriendly country. The US government doesn't need to do that though; it already has its own systems for secure communication.
I usually only care about commands from the same session, but sometimes I need to delve into the global history. With the default bash setup on most distros, the history log isn't updated until the shell terminates--leaving the "global" history incomplete until the other shells terminate. That is, I can lookup history from "dead" shells, but not from "living" ones.

I think shell history would be more practical if it appended to the history log after each command (rather than at the end of the session), and tagged each line with some form of "session ID"--allowing us to distinguish between "local" and "global" history.

You can force a flush to the log "as-is" with things like prompt overrides, but that's an all-or-nothing solution, saddling us with history from foreign shells even when we don't want it. Adding a session ID to the history log, and another flag to the built-in "history" command (to toggle between local and global history), would be a worthwhile improvement.
Jefferson might have been called a totalitarian had the word existed when he signed the judiciary act of 1802, which removed judges added by federalists.

I have learned about it this week.

https://gingrich360.com/2025/03/18/an-intolerable-judicial-d...
Yes!

Browse hackernews in CLI with hnterminal: https://github.com/Aperocky/hnterminal

Manager your task and add records in CLI with tascli: https://crates.io/crates/tascli

Just want to create your own cellular automata: https://aperocky.com/cellular-automata/

Or randomly generate terrain and see water flow down hills: https://aperocky.com/hydrosim/
What does a physical control mean in this context? Like, disabling that part of the phone's touchscreen?
Vance' offices response is very telling of his priorities and supports this view.
Can you tell if a copy was downloaded from Cisco directly? No. Does it make a technical difference? No. But those are the rules Cisco chose, and so there it is.

Is it enforceable if there is no observable difference?
Completely agree!!!
> without creating a whole new protocol

Doesn't it "just" require a CLI client that can speak both FIDO U2F and whatever the MFA provider uses? But yeah point taken.

Even if Google and Microsoft don't support it could a FOSS CLI client capable of speaking all the relevant protocols have resolved your issue? With OpenPubkey gaining support it seems to me that a service could potentially support exclusively that and in doing so cover all necessary auth methods simultaneously, at least assuming the provider is comfortable self hosting an IdP solution.
The hearing today said the messages are not classified, and wouldnt be, given it is a cabinet meeting convo.
They said what was withheld by the journalist was sensative information.
Sensative is not Classified, Classified is not Sensative.
The Sensative material withheld is about an unrelated matter, suggested to be an investigation, supposedly.
Im not sure what faith has to do with it. The media is saying there are classified leaks, but the public leaks arent classified or sensitive. The journalist can publish facts showing classified or sensative information if they want to, but so far the only facts in evidence are no classification occurred.
Does it run silent most of the time? (Except maybe fan spin-up when transcoding?)
From PHP to Osprey: Unexpected Lessons in Modern Language Design