skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Or, if I understand TFA correctly, don't release debug builds in your release packages.

Reminds me of back in the day, when I was messing around with blender's cmake config files quite a bit, I noticed the fedora package was using the wrong flag -- some sort of debug only flag intended for developers instead of whatever they thought is was. I mentioned this to the package maintainer, it was confirmed by package sub-maintainer (or whomever) and the maintainer absolutely refused to change it because the spelling of the two flags was close enough they could just say "go away, contributing blender dev, you have no idea what you're talking about." Wouldn't doubt the fedora package still has the same mistaken flag to this day and all this occurred something like 15 years ago.

So, yeah, don't release debug builds if you're a distro package maintainer.
> knowing everyone that uses an iPhone has the same features as me

Only if they use the same version
Yes! I’ve been watching his videos on YouTube
While these sub-ideologies did exist, they were fringe. This is now a primary issue for conservatives and it has been brought into the zeitgeist and their political platforms. That is different. Most, close to all, conservatives were not considering this in the late 70s. I know you know that.
On first read, this seems ridiculously onerous to me. They're trying to compel Apple to deliver interoperability for basically every unique Apple feature:

* AirPlay

* AirDrop

* Notifications + Smartwatch integration

* Headphone smart handoff (I don't even think this is possible with any standard technology, so I'm not sure what they're looking for here compliance wise)

* Proximity pairing (I also don't know that this is possible with any standard technology...)

* NFC Emulation

* Background Execution

Also,

* API documentation for all private symbols (?!)

I get the push for openness in devices but I'd never want to sell hardware in Europe, honestly. If you get big enough, they swoop in and make you turn everything you've invented into an open standard? Anyone who's maintained a private vs. a public API knows that one is orders of magnitude more expensive than the other.
This is, I think, a better way to think about LLM mistakes compared to the usual "hallucinations". I think of them as similar to human optical illusions. There are things about the human visual cortex (and also other sensory systems, see the McGurk Effect [0]), that, when presented with certain kinds of inputs, will consistently produce wrong interpretations/outputs. Even when we are 100% ware of the issue, we can't prevent our brains from generating the incorrect interpretation.

LLMs seem to have similar issues along dramatically different axes, axes that humans are not used to seeing these kinds of mistakes; where nearly no human would make this kind of mistake and so we interpret it (in my opinion incorrectly) as lack of ability or intelligence.

Because these are engineered systems, we may figure out ways to solve these problems (although I personally think the best we will ever do is decrease their prevalence), but more important is probably learning to recognize the places that LLMs are likely to make these errors, and, as your comment suggests, design work flows and systems that can deal with them.

[0] https://youtu.be/2k8fHR9jKVM
Where does interoperability = subpar user experience come from?
They are tested and the results have already been a disaster.

People don't save for 401ks. And why would they? The fact is, when you are living paycheck to paycheck, retirement takes a backseat to rent.

And even when they do save, we are currently looking at a market downturn. The last 5 years have been pretty rough in terms of the stock market with returns being much lower than you might count on.

There is an option, it's fully funding social security by lifting the income cap. It's silly that you get a tax break on SS simply by making too much money.

The biggest threats to the average person being able to retire is the government gutting, dismantling, and/or privatizing Medicaid, Medicare, and social security. With those gone, yeah grandma is going to have to work in the Foxconn factory to avoid eating catfood.

It's not completely hopeless, but people really need to be informed on this. We are running headlong into this problem because neither party wants to raise taxes to fund these essential programs.

This is a government problem to solve which is best solved by a government agency. It will be a disaster if private corporate leaches get involved, matching the current state of healthcare for anyone not disabled or younger than 65.

For anyone that advocates UBI. That's what social security is, UBI (with an age restriction).
Agree, but I would point out that the errors that I make are selected on the fact that I don't notice I'm making them, which tips the scale toward LLM errors being not as bad.
Well, most other groups have had a rough go at it throughout recent history, and often have to approach the workplace differently because it takes a long time to reverse some of our previous mistakes.

We considered many black folks property until 1865, and we had segregation of some schools in the 1960s. We didn't let women vote until 1920. We put Japanese people in internment camps until 1946. Gay folks couldn't marry in all states until 2015. Do I have to list more?

If you don't think this kind of stuff leaks into the workplace, then I don't think you're paying attention.
Twelve AP1000s are in operation or are in the final construction steps. 20 more are in the planning stages.

Russia's Rosatomexport is building roughly similar VVER-1200 power plants within about ~6 years from the first concrete. E.g.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rooppur_Nuclear_Power_Plant

They are indeed "nothing special" plants.
(someone from the marimo team here)

How you start the marimo notebook, via

`marimo edit must-give-name-to-this-file.py`

is indeed one of my teeny by favourite features of it. When you start a new notebook you're kind of forced to name it immediately.
Hemp is not THC. And hemp was legalized in 2019 federally.
I imagine this was already in the works before the recent prison shanking of transatlantic relations.

Get ready for a raft of new and extremely principled anti-monopoly regulations from former allies, I'm sure they're just getting started on writing those.
Omega 3 vs 6 and inflammation has nothing to do with it being a culture war topic or the tabula rasa GP described. Odd, soap-boxy response.

It’s also a straightforward thing to test for, assuming you can define “inflammation” without weird woo-pseudoscience.
Update: I created a placeholder repo on Github with some more information on what is currently supported. Please engage if this could help anyone https://github.com/eigilsagafos/fauna-postgres/issues/1
Very excited for the top level functions change coming up !!
> Sławosz is bringing a taste of home to space with a special menu created together with a celebrity chef and a family-owned company in Poland.

> Any food delivered to the International Space Station must be crumb-free, lightweight and keep for at least 24 months.

It sounds like they went to a lot of trouble perfecting the space pierogi. I wonder if a 20 kg bag purchased in bulk from a random milk bar might not have worked almost as well.
no source == fake news journalism.
> Nevertheless there were kind of bipartisan agreement to push this program which, in current situation of the divide in the society, would be hard to achieve,

Note that the bipartisanship of the post-WW2, pre-2000s period was almost entirely a product of the long series of overlapping political realignments going on, which left the main political divides in the country poorly aligned with the split between the major parties—there was intense political polarization, and at many times intense political violence, but it wasn't partisan because the splits cut across rather than between the major parties.

> Also the claim that 1960s were turbulent is not really correct. In fact, 1970s were really turbulent with the rise of domestic terrorism

Thr 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s were all turbulent, and domestic terrorism (including state and state-tolerated terrorism, particularly around racial issues) was quite prominent in the 1950s; “domestic terrorism” was not unique to the 1970s, though calling domestic political violence “terrorism” may have increased then.
I guess it's possible to reduce radius where that attack is executable with signal level.
Good thing they have the money then
Lived through it and while it might be similar, Microsoft had monopoly at that point (90% and higher share in personal computers - depending on the market). Apple is nowhere near that.
The article is in French, but easily auto-translated (and it's the best non-biased source I found).

> "I learned with concern that a French researcher" on assignment for the French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) "who was traveling to a conference near Houston was denied entry to the United States before being expelled ," said the Minister of Higher Education and Research, Philippe Baptiste, in a statement sent to Agence France-Presse (AFP). "This measure was apparently taken by the American authorities because the researcher's phone contained exchanges with colleagues and friends in which he expressed a personal opinion on the Trump administration's research policy ," he added.

At some point we're going to have to debate where to run "western" scientific conferences. I can see Europe/Canada and US/Russia blocs emerging, I'm curious with whom other countries will align.
I tried to clarify when I posted the original question, with an example scanario, in which, without the rider, you'd simply get paid, because the insurance company doesn't want the lawsuit.

The question for that example scenario then is: would having a rider give the insurance company a viable option that is less-desirable to you.

(Such as because it delays you getting paid, you get paid less, it gets into a buck-passing Kafkaesque process between government and insurance company, there are less protections, etc.)
Can you explain which part of the AI Act killed what exactly?

If you bother to read it, it's just common sense such as saying that a company can't just delegate all decision making to "AI" and hide behide it for critical things. For instance, in the US healthcare companies use "algorithm" as the excuse for letting people die, this would be illegal under the AI Act.

That doesn't in any way impact any AI startups selling "AI", nor companies buying/doing AI. Hell, there's AI in healthcare in France already.
I've expected this to happen, but tbh i didn't expect it to take this long.

They went for a fundamentally "lock in to a startup DB that's fully proprietary so you're screwed if we go under" which is now happening.

Open source _helps a bit_, but it doesn't change that customers now have to self-manage a database. I'm guessing most of their customers are not particularly savvy at DB self-hosting.
Thanks. I guess I was thinking about looking to see if there is dna from upstream passing by. At some point I'd guess it is hard to tell if there are fish upstream but I'm not sure how to think about what factors are important. On the other hand just looking at streams isn't the worst thing to do.

I don't think my own curiosity is a good enough reason to build a trap or barrier. But a camera is a good idea. I actually just picked up some parts from blue robotics to put together a setup for one or more cameras using some stuff I have laying around.

Cool sticklebacks! One of the places I stumbled on Sculpins was in the Taylor River on Vancouver island. I saw something moving and nearly froze myself staying in until I found several of them.
>Do people think Trump, Musk, and Thiel don't want to be richer?

FYI, lots of dumb people actually DO believe that. "Oh they have so much money already" they say. They don't even attempt to square that with collecting more resources than some Gods, for, reasons.
Yep and probably more like 99.999% of companies.

But the selling point of Fauna was primarily the data distribution, no? Like GC Spanner but without having to sell and arm and a leg.

(Spanner is more affordable now but it used to cost hundreds per month to get started)
Drones Will Do Some Schlepping for Sherpas on Mount Everest
https://archive.ph/VbSLW
it's not a non-story because even if she was trying to get around something she didn't deserve to be _detained_ instead of simply being turned around.
Good comment. I would suggest if you get to the point where you want to really analyze your probability of success, you try one of the retirement modeling apps (I use and really like Boldin).

It was VERY eye opening for me in a good way. I have verified my results with several other sources. Its no guarantee of course, but I got some peace-of-mind from doing this.
Phish is the greatest band of all time and if you haven't attended a show I sincerely feel you are missing out, regardless of what your musical taste is.

If you play an instrument, or have ever played in a band, you'll definitely appreciate the show they put on.
> but I'd never want to sell hardware in Europe

This is a weird take. By the time you have enough market dominance for this to affect you, you should be able to afford to make these changes.
More detailed links have been posted already in the thread.

But I want Reuters/etc to include these links.
It’s true that we don’t store outputs in the file format. This is the main tradeoff, as discussed in the blog. But that doesn’t mean marimo notebooks aren’t suitable for heavy computation.

marimo lets you automatically snapshot outputs in an auxiliary file while you work. We also have a persistent cache that lets you pick up where you left off — saving not just outputs but also computed data.

Many of our users do very heavy computation.

https://docs.marimo.io/guides/expensive_notebooks/
interoperability with subpar user experience is just an excuse for poor engineering or low resources. I.e, my x-wifi-network card doesn't work in Linux. No one is spending time making it work / too many devices to test properly. It is the manufacturers responsibility to make it work with linux and they don't care so there are a few people that make it work and write generic drivers that may or may not be optimized to the specific manufature. Same story for all " interoperability subpar user experience"
You lose out on so many use cases without the stored output. The first that comes to mind is all of the learning resources that are now presented in notebooks.

Most learners do not need to fact check the instructor, but do want to see the operations which were run. Those that are curious can run/edit the notebook themselves.

Edit: The JupyterBook ecosystem (https://executablebooks.org/en/latest/gallery/) as an example of what is possible with stored plots/calculations. Most learners are just going to follow along with the material, but being able to optionally play with the data is the super power of the platform with minimal friction.
The academic establishment has done a pretty good job of excluding and discrediting anyone without a PhD from actively participating in research.
Bit more info about the startup behind it: https://www.gscan.eu/
It's a big ask for a region that only represents about 7% of Apple revenue. I don't see how Apple leaves the EU, or how they will comply with all of these demands.
I would like to remind everyone assuming that some kind of hassles at the border are normal and necessary (even if the specifics of this one make you mad) that this is NOT the case.

Our current international regime of widespread passports, residency permits, visas, and border checks is barely 100 years old. Even in my lifetime (pre-9/11) the US-Canada border was a passport-free affair: just show the border guard your drivers' license (if you were the driver) and tell them you had nothing to declare -- they knew you were lying but didn't care.

It is not an iron law that international borders have to be dystopian "papers please" civil-liberties-optional free-fire zones. There is little point in the US policing either land border at all, but hassling NAFTA citizens (aka Canadians and Mexicans) traveling on business is especially absurd. A Schengen-style regime in North America (it's only THREE countries, should be pretty easy!) is way beyond overdue, but it seems like we're instead headed in the opposite direction as fast as we possibly can.

Open borders are the default state of the world. Anything interfering with our ability to travel should be in response to a specific, real problem. Instead, we've handed the door keys to our whole country to a handful of cops and private contractors who get paid more when they hassle us more.
The problem comes when the few things they do that are good are perceived as bad bc the people doing the good are perceived to be bad.
Apologies, but I really do not care about sports awards or whatever - we're basically at the point in the USA that we're trying (or succeeding) to force de-transitioning because of bullshit like "He took her awards!"

When there's an impact that individual bad actors have, that's why we have individual punishments - we don't punish all men or all women for one bad actor, its nonsensical to treat trans folks as some homogeneous group when they literally embody the opposite :]
It means it costs them three months per year per employee. So, 'n' employees, n/4 years of man-power is spent fixing issues found by fuzzing. As others have said, FTE (full-time equivalent) is the more common name.
I'm a dyed-in-the-wool kool-aid-drinking Apple fanboy, and think you're being too kind: it's a shibboleth, cargo-cult thinking, a thought-terminating cliche: most simply, utterly irrational and meaningless as rendered.

I'm more than happy to entertain it when there's specifics, but it's most kindly described as lazy, the way I see it deployed these days.
This is just one more reason to keep bluetooth disabled on mobile devices. There have been other vulnerabilities with bluetooth itself, and bluetooth is constantly used to track people. What's the point of leaving it on all the time when most of the time it's just going to drain your battery and open you up to being tracked or exploited.
> They're trying to compel Apple to deliver interoperability for basically every unique Apple feature

IANAL but the impression I got wasn't that they are requiring Apple to deliver interoperability, just that Apple can't block it. I.e. they can't create APIs that enable those things and not allow third parties to invoke them.
I also was nerdsniped into trying this and found that after extracting the features array into a newline delimited json file, DuckDB finishes the example query in 500 ms (M1 Mac), querying the 1.3 GB json file directly with read_json!
I wish the EU was a little less short sighted with this regulation.

It's completely fair to request that Apple provide APIs for interoperability purposes. And these requests obviously need to come initially from third party hardware developers.

But there needs to be some mechanism for protecting the privacy and security of users that is evaluated by experts and not EU regulators. It's very obvious that companies e.g. Meta are trying to abuse the DMA in order to try to get more user data and not for interoperability purposes. And it's not what the world needs right now.
> If you get big enough, they swoop in and make you turn everything you've invented into an open standard?

well they could force them to split up like the US did for standard oil and bell. but the US doesn't do that any more cause they've been bought out.

I mean headphones is obviously using control of one market to impact another segment for control.
> If you get big enough

Don't worry, you have a higher chance of getting hit by an meteorite while doing jumping jacks while riding a giraffe than getting big enough to be covered by DMA/DSA.

> Proximity pairing

Bluetooth?

> AirPlay

Chromecast exists and is quite open, this is not rocket science.

> AirDrop

Bluetooth and the new thing where you can just send to a nearby Android phone exist, again, really not rocket science.

And etc etc etc. None of these are some prorpietary unsolvable issues (like if the EU had said that they have to allow anyone to build their own M-chips), it's just that Apple choose to only make them work with their ecosystem.
Here is my list:

* Put my shit away.

That's it. The number one issue I see with ADHD, and this only really applies to extreme ADHD, is a complete inability to remember to either put things away or to remember to take your things with you. Consider it casual unintentional abandonment of everything you own one item at a time.
Impressive, it took me 113K bunnies for a single frame drop on an iPhone 14pro
As a user, that all sounds great to me. I should be able to run whatever software I want on my hardware, not just what the manufacturer deems so.
I guess I'm not nearly as sure of what others are aware of, so I'll just provide https://www.project2025.observer as a great resource for tracking actions of the current administration.
> But there needs to be some mechanism for protecting the privacy and security of users

That sounds like an implementation issue that can be solved by Apple securing their runtime and APIs.
I think what's fascinating about it is the daylight changes you experienced in the 20 deg latitude change you experience from Orlando to Seattle are dwarfed by the changes from a ~15 degree latitude change from Seattle to Anchorage. By the time you're getting close to the pole, you can see huge differences in solstice minimum/maximum sunlight by moving just a few hundred miles north or south.
So when some are preferred with "equal" skills others are discriminated against.

Why should a rational person support people who act against him. This will horribly backfire...
This is an active fork: https://github.com/dathere/qsv
Cool, but what's wrong with Filen ?
https://filen.io/

or with Internxt ?
https://internxt.com/
Hey yeah (i'm JT) we built it from the ground up using Pixi. We went that route because so many of the existing libraries were limited in their extensibility, stuff like our model visualizations, inline ai, and customizing the formula lang to handle things like dot notation weren't possible. It's got a long way to go but I'm proud of how far the team has taken it.
> "Today's decisions wrap us in red tape, slowing down Apple's ability to innovate for users in Europe" the company said in an email.

Authored by Apple Intelligence? Certainly enough training material exists, considering all prior statements bemoaning the EU/EC. Here's Apple sounding the alarm on the evils of USB-C [0]

"When it was introduced in September 2021, an Apple representative told BBC News: "Strict regulation mandating just one type of connector stifles innovation rather than encouraging it, which in turn will harm consumers in Europe and around the world."

[0] https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-66708571
You can fail to mention critics without copying anyone. For example, doing nothing at all satisfies both conditions.

Maybe you meant failing to cite authors you quote? That's not what the OP is talking about.
Definitely unpopular opinion.

I love 4 seasons. But the weather and day length make for a difficult half-year from Oct - Mar. The NE corridor has some of these traits, but it was a lot easier to deal with there. In the NE, rain & grey-skies aren't as persistent. In Seattle, a month can go by without seeing the sun.
> they can't create APIs that enable those things and not allow third parties to invoke them.

Entertainingly the same reason microsoft didn't lock down the kernel interfaces that lead to crowdstriking everything. MS wanted to be the only security product in the kernel.
> You shouldn't distribute things you can't prove have the same results

Why not? Can you expand on this because I don't see why this is not a good thing.

Besides if you distribute your code alongside your output, aren't you providing that proof anyway? People can run your code and see they are getting the same result.