skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Noted! I filed a bug: https://github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis/issues/38

All of this is placeholder wording, layouts, CSS, and more. It'll be fixed in time. This is teething pain that I will get through.
That is basically never true any more, even in large government and large enterprise.

Microsoft has dialled up the pricing to match Oracle, which means that now everyone has to be so frugal with cores assigned to their DB servers that any software performance benefits are simply lost. Cheaper or open source database engines can be assigned 10x or even 100x the compute capacity at the same cost.

One “trick” Microsoft pulled was to quietly change per-core licensing to per-vCPU (hyper-thread) if you use SQL in the cloud. This means that it costs 2x as much as it used to on-prem.

Then they have the nerve to publish marketing about how you can “save money” by migrating to Azure.

Narrator: You can’t.
I have two conferences booked and paid for in the US this year. (I'm Canadian)

I am canceling the one in April.

The other is harder for me to cancel, as its my industry main conference for the year.
It will hurt me professionally, and fanatically not to go.

But stories like this, White woman with good paper work, and regular traveler to the USA (similar to myself), No criminal record, No apparent reason, no ability to call a lawyer, getting detained for weeks, is making me very nervous.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/19/canadian-det...

My company is considering starting our own local conference, outside the US, as an alternative. A expensive and distracting exercise that I would prefer not to have to do.

I am not worried about gun violence in the US at the moment.

I am worried about arbitrary detention without representation or recourse.
> The result of victory here would just be yet another vector for regulators to increase control over and/or impose censorship on LLM creators

as long as ClosedAI and other companies censor their models I'll play the world's smallest violin for them
Immigrants are a boogeyman. The US is a massive country with a huge economy. Most of them are seeking better opportunities by doing jobs Americans don't want to do. There have always been waves of immigrants since the US was founded. And it's not true that Biden allowed unlimited immigration.

At any rate, this is just a distraction from how the Trump administration has been seeking to consolidate executive power unconstitutionally since taking office a 2nd time.
>There's a lot of debate among communists about what collective means, but no one reasonably claims that collective means "private ownership".

I dunno about the communists, but to me everybody owning shares of the company they work for sounds like collective ownership of the means of production. We could maybe argue about the threshold around which it becomes or stops being literal communism, because I don't this important KPI of ours in the article.
I suspect there's some tongue in cheek with those numbers unless the one meaningful connection they have was the result of literally 20,000 swipes.
Thank you for your support and feature suggestions. I'll definitely consider this. How does this pomodoro screen look? Sneak peek of app :) https://cln.sh/GxbTVNM7
The LLM shouldn’t.

robots.txt is intended to control recursive fetches. It is not intended to block any and all access.

You can test this out using wget. Fetch a URL with wget. You will see that it only fetches that URL. Now pass it the --recursive flag. It will now fetch that URL, parse the links, fetch robots.txt, then fetch the permitted links. And so on.

wget respects robots.txt. But it doesn’t even bother looking at it if it’s only fetching a single URL because it isn’t acting recursively, so robots.txt does not apply.

The same applies to Claude. Whatever search index they are using, the crawler for that search index needs to respect robots.txt because it’s acting recursively. But when the user asks the LLM to look at web results, it’s just getting a single set of URLs from that index and fetching them – assuming it’s even doing that and not using a cached version. It’s not acting recursively, so robots.txt does not apply.

I know a lot of people want to block any and all AI fetches from their sites, but robots.txt is the wrong mechanism if you want to do that. It’s simply not designed to do that. It is only designed for crawlers, i.e. software that automatically fetches links recursively.
Which frontier model provider let's me specific what websites to search and it will only search those?
Refusing a foreigner entry for inciting violence (even against people who are not Americans and not in the U.S.) would be perfectly fine with me, though I don't approve of demanding foreigners make all their communications available to CBP (which is basically how we got here).
I have a subscription, please could I ask how you do this? I only know of the append ? Feature.
For any armed force, even a 2-3 million strong one, fighting a war against an entire population of 40 million goes one of two ways:

- unimaginable atrocities that would make Hitler blush, and then they might still lose

- Vietnam x 100
It's good for everybody. We have to work less to survive. Everyone is more productive at whatever they do. The value is in the ideas not the medium. You might write a book and I'll take it and use AI to turn it into audio, or a tv series, or a movie, or a video game.

The bottleneck is no longer on labor to turn ideas into reality, the bottleneck is imagination itself. It's incredible. The cost to produce/consume going down along with many other facets of the economy translates into deflation.

If you make less money, or work less hours, or only have a single person in your family work - that's ok because money will go further. That's the whole idea behind Star Trek, the first step though was intelligent computers, automation and robots. Harnessed in a way that doesn't backfire on us.
Will it last another 2 years?
Several CI systems have come and gone.
I'll check that out. Thanks
> Is there some simpler unified way to describe the interactions between semiconductor electric fields/electrons, photons, and thermal energy?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condensed_matter_physics

Thermal energy is treated as quantum excitations called phonons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon

Oh wait you said simpler...
Interesting article from 2018

Bird flu: are viruses still in the air?
https://theconversation.com/bird-flu-are-viruses-still-in-th...

video link from the page

https://vimeo.com/54846156/76f829917d

Do we as people who do not have access to chicken farming really under stand what happens to the feathers and the transmission to humans that might cause.

For example, the machines commonly used at live poultry markets in Southeast Asia to defeather poultry for clients may dramatically increase the amount of virus-laden particles in the air. When considering live poultry markets as potential sources of virus-laden emissions in densely populated urban cities, they also modeled the potential dispersion of airborne particles within a 100-metre radius depending on the direction of the wind.
would really love to so the new whisper style speech to text model open sourced.
Not sure on that... AMD's 128+ core servers are competitive to ARM on power per unit of work and exceed them on total compute. It's still very competitive.
I'm only sympathetic to a point. If I distributed C++ code to paying customers who wanted to compile it locally, I'd surely take their needs into account. For anything I was releasing as FOSS, deal with it. For instance, my nearby server is running Debian 12/Bookworm with GCC 12. According to https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html, that supports nearly all of C++20. If you can't be bothered to upgrade to your system every few years, I'm not going to make more than 0 effort to cater to your ancient compilers.

In Python terms, today I wouldn't break a sweat to manage unsupported Python versions (https://devguide.python.org/versions/). If my stuff runs on an old Python 3.8 system, right on! I wouldn't deliberately break it or anything. But if something came along in 3.9 that makes my life more pleasant, I wouldn't hesitate to use it.

I also vehemently disagree with your Python characterization. There are any number of common, well-supported ways to easily install arbitrary versions on your system, including pyenv and uv. I have multiple versions installed on the laptop I'm typing this on. I do zero development inside containers: all my work runs directly on the host. And yet, none of them conflict with each other at all.
dang only unflags posts

If you think about this for a bit, it'll probably become clear that can't possibly be true and have the HN front page look they way it usually does. Beside the many mod comments that talk about other kinds of story moderation. But it's a rare case of a thing you can totally derive from first principles/minimal observation!
"Bathroom with an epic view": https://jitty.com/properties/TOFkSADP9QuQAV03XTbg?i=78042905
How to Validate Email Addresses in C#?
We joined the burnout machine under our own free will. What else did we expect? Moloch's not getting any less hungry.
Jeff you know what would be magical? Not just vanilla diarization "Speaker 1" and "2" but if the model can know from the conversation this speaker was referred to as "Jeff Harris" or "Jeff" so it uses that instead.
> I’m old enough to remember when people said Apple was going to miss Machine Learning, and narratives are always easy to build when something’s gone wrong.

This "I'm old enough to remember the naysayers" rhetoric is so boring. "People" were right - Apple kicked Nvidia to the curb before they could ship an equivalent GPGPU featureset and abandoned Khronos/OpenCL before it could compete. Their inference hardware is considered second-class even compared to AMD's offerings and has zero industry buy-in outside Apple's own labs. Their NPU tensor acceleration hardware is not meaningfully distinct compared to competitors. Their compute shaders and proprietary frameworks are not a replacement for OpenCL. Buy-in on Mac-native acceleration is in a freefall, compared to yesteryear.

CUDA is an excellent opportunity for Apple to meaningfully reflect on what it means to ship capable software and hardware in the modern age. They will almost certainly squander it so they can focus on a high-margin consumer tech market instead of the the less profitable industry demands.
It's way cheaper - everyone is, elevenlabs is very expensive. Nobody matches their quality though. Especially if you want something that doesn't sound like a voice assistant/audiobook/podcast/news anchor/tv announcer.

This openai offering is very interesting, it offers valuable features elevenlabs doesn't in emotional control. It also hallucinates though which would need to be fixed for it to be very useful.
Indeed, there are disadvantages to being the world's reserve currency. This is known as the Tiffin Dilemma and was articulated in 60's:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triffin_dilemma

Basically this is why times have been great for industries like finance and tech in the US, but sucked for manufacturing. In turn leading to wealth inequality and, dare we say the class struggle that seem to have reached a boiling point.
Riiiight up to the point that the database needs to be online and running backups at the same time.

When that occurs, your “simple” tech choice suddenly becomes a too simple straitjacket.
From my non expert understanding, we already do kinda. The masks used for photolithography are made using an electron beam, allowing for a much greater resolution than what the underlying photolithography allows. But this is far too slow for large scale production.

Scanning an electron beam, repeatedly over an entire waffer would take forever. So instead we do it once, to make the mask, and that mask is then used over and over to expose the waffer.

This is a bit little injection molding: the mold is very expensive and made with a far better manufacturing process than the plastic pieces that it will eventually produce, but this is the price to pay for high volumes and low costs.
It’s a nuanced topic. If we want to dive in, I can provide a glimpse into the first layer of the anus as we stick our head into it.

When we shepherded a lot of sheep into frontend via these courses and boot camps and quasi courses/bootcamps in the form of certain frameworks (hey, you only know this one framework?), we created a cohort of something.

Now what is that something? It’s not really the tinkerer that loves doing this stuff and would have found a way to express themselves (please pay attention to the word “express”, as in, can’t help it). That something was … a pragmatic identity. A pragmatic identity was formed where “I am now a software engineer because I and my cohort agree, we really know how to do our stuff”.

Such a cohort can only be fueled by identity, not passion. This cohort can’t innovate and must cling to the identity of their original accreditation, so they will always be defensive.

That’s the first layer of the asshole as we enter it, it goes deeper. The second layer involves large amounts of money and people’s livelihoods, to which they’d defend unto death.
No, I only noodled with the free/trial searches before, but this reminded me to pay and make it my default.
The duck curve can be easily flattened by using vertical panels which extend the production of solar a few hours in each direction. Vertical panels take no space (think every fence; or on farmland with enough space for big machinery to move), better performance (because heat isn't trapped), panels are always clean (daily gust of wind takes care of it). I'm sure there are many HN discussions on vertical panels.
I feel like we as a country screwed up the prioritization of a child's right to life vs a parent's right to extend their religion to their child.

I know, I know but where do we draw the line???
You can, but at some point things start breaking down. Your dependencies are all outdated and pile up CVEs (which you probably are contractually obligated to do something against.) The dev-tool extension is no longer maintained, and Sentry stops support too.
You want to improve things by migrating to the new version or competing framework, but that requires lots of toil, since a lot of things changed in subtle ways or are done differently now, and that has ripple effects. Before you know it, you’ve spent four months playing the zero-sum game of rewriting your frontend. Finally you’ve made it, and then they release Tailwind 4.
I don't think that's true unless they're living in extreme poverty.
So says Gemma 3.
The market being the sum of iPhone end-users buying other stuff than iPhones.

> The goal isn’t that Apple competes “fairly” on any arbitrary platform, it’s specifically that Apple competes “fairly” on the platform that Apple puts their best features on.

It's about putting features on the platform which are beneficial only to other products of Apple.

The goal is that if Apple offers products on the market it is gatekeeping, it does so in a way that doesn't hinder fair competition on that market.

Apple competing on headphones for iPhones while offering features that require iOS functionality not accessible to competitors is not fair competition.
Cadillac Desert posits this about most of the American West, it was sparsely populated prior to the widespread usage of pumps for water and dam program (to generate electricity to pump reservoir water) of Bureau of Reclamation and Army Corps of Engineers. Those power plants and population growths might have fueled American productivity in WW2 but it also was a subsidized consolidation of farms under large corporations and rich individuals when it was meant to help smaller farmers. It's an older book with a 2017 update.
I'm not looking but these ratios are insane.
Nvidia DGX Station
I agree to a certain point, but writing (invented in the past few thousand years) has not led to more complex languages. I've worked on languages for which there was, until a few decades ago, no writing system, and they're every bit as complex as long-written languages.

The qualitative differences between human languages and any animal "language" (scare quotes intentional) include recursion and breadth of vocabulary, and likely a lot of other things to. Recursion and the ability to learn a large vocabulary are probably biological and unique to us, the other things might or might not be unique to us
> result of victory here would just be yet another vector for regulators to increase control over and/or impose censorship on LLM creators, as well as creating sources of "liability" for open source AI developers, which would be terrible for actual privacy.

Sounds great actually.
Looks interesting. Don't see any info on pricing though?
Pretty cool to see a C++ R/W Iceberg client without dependency, and even better open-sourced. The pipeline is all about processing and routing, ideally, to open and flexible destination with no lock-in and long-term retention. Writing into Apache Iceberg is becoming critical to give users real control, rather than into specific data warehouses or lakehouses that are hard to move out.
This is sad, weird, and very off topic for HN.

Guidelines:
> anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity

I fail to see how this even remotely reaches that rather loosely defined bar.
Refutations needed
I can't reproduce the error. Is there any evidence that others are getting the same answer?
I had good results with pyannote and the following model for that use case in the past https://huggingface.co/pyannote/speaker-diarization-3.1
Have there been successful general-software unions formed before? I see and hear this idea relatively frequently, but never past that.

I sort of feel like most people don't stay at a place long enough to get cohesion or see enough they don't want to stay in the first place, good people chase better job offers (and congratulate themselves for doing it on their own), less good may stick around longer because they can't move but also are more focused to just stay employed.

Software is also a broad industry in terms of the type of deliverable work (e.g. think buy-once software vs. SaaS vs. in-house industrial controls), skillsets, and environment. It's also hard for me to even conceive of what a typical fast-moving startup would look like full union. Lines between ownership and management and labor can get very blurred.

Is the best hope to look at things like the entertainment industry which are also extremely fluid, but have been very successful? Do we need a long-term period of dev salaries coming closer to median pay (which we might be entering now)? Do we need to better address the ageism monster?

The games industry recently made some real headway [1], which I applaud. Maybe focusing on smaller sectors is the right approach.

[1] https://www.gamedeveloper.com/production/industry-wide-union...
It feels nuts to me that there is a push away from strict APIs to conversational interfaces for products and then the actual technology itself under the hood is translating that into a strict set of API calls in order to understand something. Would it not be better to seek interoperability with fairly well scripted natural language handshake. I feel like MCP is built for understanding language and Syntax to a greater degree but not random tools and APIs.
That it is the most powerful
You’re incorrect, buying a new EV when you have an ICE car doesn’t actually destroy the ICE vehicle.

There’s a bunch of different possibilities to consider, but if you drive more than the average person buying an EV and selling your ICE is great for the environment. If you rarely drive then keeping an old ICE car out of the hands of a frequent driver has real value etc.

As to the environmental impact vs retrofitting an ICE vehicle into an EV, the grid has gotten a lot cleaner over time so many of the old assumptions around EV’s are outdated. Comparing the emissions from extracting, transporting, refining, and then burning gas vs the same with EV’s built with a cleaner grid and more electrified infrastructure now heavy favors EV’s. And these calculations just keep favoring EV’s more every year.
Hence it would review the data available and try to combine the results into an adequate response but clearly there is some significant issue in combining results.
He said he spent several hours a week swiping. Several hours a week times 3 years is a lot more than 20,000 swipes.
I'm not interested in litigating the merits of VCs, I was commenting positively and not normatively on the peculiarly small ratio of engaged financiers to obvious urban dysfunction in San Francisco.
The result of legal victory here would be to make whole the person who for some amount of time was the victim of a particularly heinous form of libel.

Your other arguments aren’t serious. Every organization has to pick and choose what activities they participate in and which they don’t, there are opportunity costs and they aren’t cheap.
And Alaska is still in the USA, so my critique of the title stands. If it had said 48 contiguous states it would have been accurate.
> … hacked my Sun 3/60

L1-A to bring up the boot monitor. Search memory for `/bin/login` and replace with `bin/ed`. Enter any file name as your ‘user’ name, or just junk, and use `!sh`.

(Amazing what you remember from school…)
I imagine this is completely serious, and isn't that different from what I've seen in a big city (NYC). Back when I was permitting myself to use these apps (2017, before I truly assessed the cost-benefit analysis), I met a girl who apparently swiped left on every guy. She showed me her Tinder and she had over 5,000 matches (and for some reason was meeting up with me, although it didn't last very long. I think she did get married a few years ago, though). That experience makes me think that the 20,000 number is legitimately a reasonable estimate.
Not sure if you're aware of it, but there's even a game engine written in Go that has been used for a few commercial titles: https://ebitengine.org/en/showcase.html
"Floor to ceiling libraries with a ladder"

Does that mean it excludes most of the results from "Floor to ceiling libraries without a ladder"?

You know, if I'm buying a house, I think I can supply my own ladder separately...

Less pedantically, what I'm trying to say is: are you really sure these are the kinds of searches that home buyers are really looking for? "Home in london, under £1m, with big beautiful windows" - I suspect that most London buyers are going to care an awful lot about where in London the house is, a city-wide search isn't going to be useful to most. Maybe your functionality (as presented) won't inspire actual buyers.

Speaking of which, that might be a way to improve it - combine with location & mapping data to figure out nearby transport, services, schools, etc...
"i'm into tall kinky guys and you seem exactly my type"

OP has revealed he has a huge advantage. You can't teach being six foot, and in my experience that's the number one qualifier for racking up body count.
He never said he was testing FSD. He referred to it as Autopilot throughout the video.
The f-35 lacks the range and speed, coupled with the lack of airbases in Canada means that it is not very effective. Canada needs something like a Su-35, a big twin engine with a large range, but those aren't for sale, obviously.

It's not the F-35's fault it's not suitable for Canada. It was never intended for tundra. It's Canada's fault that for the last 20 years there's been no juicy tender for a long range fighter to entice the europeans or the yanks to come up with a suitable modification of one of their twin fighter jets.
It was not the burnout machine when all of us joined.