skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I like how the graph shows the change in size per version.

"Publish size" is a little misleading though. I thought that meant the size that would be included in my bundle when I publish my app, and was wondering how you were calculating that. Maybe "w/ deps" "w/o deps"?

I'd appreciate you not hiding information below the fold. Really hate that design trend. Remove the `min-height: 100vh` and see how much better it looks (with a bit of padding). At least make it 90vh.
Malaysia green-lights new MH370 search
To be fair, NYC’s MTA writes tardy slips too: https://delayverification.mta.info/

I shudder to imagine the working relationship where that’s relevant.

But I very much appreciate the advantages you point out. I felt a little sense of loss when, on work in that city, I noticed that some degree of cellular service had reached the stations…
It doesn’t seem like this is a serious concern. Hiding tech that exists in a mass market product doesn’t seem feasible.
No, in fact, codemcp can be thought of as a fancier version of the official filesystem MCP that Anthropic released. It's 100% MCP.
Yeah I get this. Often I'll prompt it like "my intern looked at this and said maybe you should x. What do you think?"

Seems to help.
That's right! People who are used to fasting don't want to miss out regardless. I mean you get the best type of food in Ramadan which for some reason people don't make the rest of the year.
My favorite way is to just have this in my zsh aliases.

# Find file by prefix (ignore case).
# Usage: 'f' or 'f myfile' or 'f myfile.txt \etc'
# or f '*css'

function f() {
find ${2:-.} -iname "${1}*" 2>/dev/null | grep '^\|[^/]*$'
}

# We use noglob, so zsh doesn't expand characters like "*"
# and so we can do e.g. f *css
alias f='noglob f'
I don't make any claims as to the level of his involvement, but the bad stuff happened both before and after his departure. Many of the moderation decisions discussed in the Twitter Files took place while he was still CEO.
No. It's not many agents in the workflow. It's not an agent per node.

The whole workflow and the Runner class is for one agent.

Check out this line: https://github.com/openai/openai-agents-python/blob/48ff99bb...

A single `run_agent` is implemented based on the Runner class and workflow. So usually the workflow is for one agent (unless there is handoff).
I used O1 Pro to write a .NET authorization filter which when I wrote it I didn’t even know what that was. I was like “I have this problem, how can I fix it” and it just started going and the solution worked the first try. Everyone at work was like “great job!” I guess I did feed it a bunch of surrounding code and the authorization policy, but the policy only allowed us to attach one security trait when we wanted it to be “attach any number of security attributes and verify the user has at least one”. Still, it solved what likely would have been at least a day or two of research in an hour or so conversation.
I use NFC for all my payments minus bars and restaurants. (NE USA)
I also switched all my door locks to use Apple Home Key which is a fun party trick.
> Maybe the core is that i don't understand why you agree with it :)

Because of encapsulation. I don't need to look far to see the effects of encapsulation (and abstraction) on computing.

I read your whole comment, but I really want to tighten this discussion up. I think the biggest thing I'm personally missing from coming over to your view of things is examples. In particular:

> Almost all libraries are littered with safe encapsulation that is utterly broken in many ways. Not like "oh if you think about this very hard it's broken".

Can you show me? If it's really "almost all," then you should even be able to point to a crate I've authored with a broken safe encapsulation. `regex-automata`, `jiff`, `bstr`, `byteorder`, `memchr` and `aho-corasick` all use `unsafe`. Can you find a point of unsoundness?

I don't want a library here or there. I am certain there are some libraries that are intentionally flouting Rust's norms here. So a couple of examples wouldn't be enough to convince me because I don't think a minority of people flouting Rust's norms is a big problem unless it can be shown that this minority is growing in size. What I want to see is evidence that this is both widespread and intentional. It's hard for me to believe that it is without me noticing.

If you want to do this privately, you can email: jamslam@gmail.com
Increasing supply will burn speculators out too.
Yeah if someone force me with gun to say it, I'd say even reading braille doesn't count as reading either. But it doesn't matter anyway since it's just different modes of absorbing information.
Hm, I feel like I have roughly the exact same functionality with zsh and some various plugins, including the meta editing experience shown in your demo video ($EDITOR) via Kitty and/or WezTerm.
You’re confusing data with meaning, understanding, and truth.

How many freedom units in the index am I experiencing right now? Will getting more units make me happier?

You can measure data without that data having a meaningful bearing on the topic you care about.
All my random open source contributions/projects I think have helped. Especially since I've been working in a niche like Salesforce, it really gives me a leg up to show that I've built stuff in nodejs, c#, etc.

The other gain is that I learned a lot from those, and that will show through in an interview regardless of whether they looked at my GitHub or not.
Facebook was, while mostly not a public place (at least the way I used it), was always pretty gregarious by their design, in my experience. I admit to this being public and I believe I see how you are making the distinction. I accept it as a valid one to make.

On the other hand, while Facebook and the like had me interacting with those in my relational proximity, here it seems I am relating with people more in my cultural and professional proximity (largely due to the rules and cultural norms here). Sometimes it's just small talk and at others more technical or serious life matters but it's communicating with other humans (and likely a few bots) about life, sharing information and ideas, challenging one another to learn and grow. These seem like deeply social behaviors and that's a big part of why I regard this as social media.

With regard to the mall, that seems far more like Twitter or Reddit than here. While Reddit is less clear, Twitter is widely regarded as social media. On the other end is email that is "a human talking to another human" and regarded as not social media. Not to say you're wrong, just trying to explain my view and offer that as a bit of evidence that the boundaries are not so clear.
I like https://www.phpliteadmin.org/

For sqlite
Maybe I've picked up some bias from the years I spent where my bicycle commute took me through the homeless camp. I'm lucky to have had very few times where I wasn't sure where I'd be sleeping that night, but it's still something that I consider quite often.
Here's what I'd want from accounting software; a credible exit strategy that if you go bankrupt or decide that you need to tweak your pricing too much, I can take my data and run it on my own infrastructure. Have you thought about an open source business model? Even just offer the basic platform as open source (e.g. keep the AI stuff proprietary). Also, your pricing is too high; Xero offers a more generous starter plan for $20 / month.
That's never been the standard at the border.

The starting assumption when crossing any[0] international border is that you don't have a right to enter the country, until you prove otherwise.

People from wealthy Western countries are generally used to just waving their passports and passing through, but that is not nor has it ever been some kind of automatic right. People are questioned and denied entry all the time, should they fail to satisfy the border official of their eligibility for entry under the exact terms of their visa (or the relevant visa waiver program).

I'm very sympathetic to the idea that border officials should have less discretion to deny people entry without very solid reasons, but if you start talking about 'innocent until proven guilty' at a border today, you're not going to have a good time.

[0] International agreements can of course modify this default assumption, e.g. Schengen.
I am completely mesmerized.

Locally to me, far from anywhere it belongs, an independent-spirited Japanese man operates a little izakaya as a solo enterprise. Jazz, shockingly varied menu for the square footage and manpower; the whole deal.

He keeps a television set up at the bar he works behind—pointed away from the bar, toward him. He shows only kittens playing and views from train drivers’ windows…
I can confirm, the rules aren't any better. what I do is have a main prompt that just tells the model to adhere to the rules and lists them out. It doesn't really work.
A human runs on ~100W, even when not doing anything useful. It's entirely plausible that 100W will be enough to run a future AGI level model.
Webcat: Web-Based Code Assurance and Transparency
I can only hope to one day be rich and successful enough that this could be my life.
It’s funny AI will happily follow my lead and “bounce too close to a supernova” and I really have to push it to offer something new.
long pork:

https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority...
CTA never did that; I don’t think they could if the wanted to.

Metra did it, I’m 99.9% sure they stopped years ago. But yeah, there would be a person at the platform when the train arrived downtown with a piece of paper saying that the train was delayed. A late slip.

Nowadays, you have real-time location tracking of the train. If it’s late, you can tell your employer what train you’re on and they could verify it. At least to a better degree than with the late slips. Still not perfect. But if you’ve got an employer that would want to verify such things, you’ve got worse problems.
Do you have an example? I’m curious.
> even on an A100 40GB for the 3 billion parameter model

Would any of the models run on something like a raspberry pi?

How about a smartphone?
Circular Ring 2 – blood pressure tracking via OTA update in late 2025
THis felt pertinant. Especially noting the [flagged] status:

> Indeed, one consistent feedback I’ve heard from a subset of readers here is something to this effect: “I used to like reading your stuff more when you weren’t writing about politics all the time.”

> My response to that is: “Yeah, me too.” It’s not that I’m suddenly interested in writing about political matters; it’s that various actions by this administration keep intruding on my areas of coverage.

> A less charitable interpretation of that reader comment is that anyone still giving such feedback is either dangerously uninformed, being disingenuous, or just doesn’t want to keep being reminded that they’re on the side of the villains, despite all the evidence showing it.

I don't want to go full throttle on this, but I think the mostly neutral stance being taken historically over flagging and un-flagging is going to be a semi constant irritation now that there is active warfare to "capture the flag(ging)" going on. I suppose I could be told "always thus" but I do think there's a qualitative difference emerging to past practice.

The difference is, if you critique Musk/Doge you get flagged. It's almost robotic. It's strongly suggestive of a coded solution. I don't think we always had that.
Market is 1/10th USA size.
Sources of Accidental Complexity (2014)
I agree with that, but:

- the language still allows you write the unsafe version even with defer. By your logic fallible humans will continue to write these class of bugs because they can.
- adding a whole new flow control construct will introduce a whole new class of bugs. The dog barking example is cool for demonstrating how defer works, but is completely unreadable for what it does, programmers will write code like that because they are allowed to, and unreadable code becomes buggy code.
- to make a language safer you should remove the things that make unsafe behavior possible, not add constructs which make safe behavior easier.
Only gripe I have with the tool is that once you've gotten a country right a few times it zooms in too far. I still had no clue where Eritrea was after getting it right like four times. Just got lucky.

But now that the map only shows me three possible countries I can trivially remember which one it was. Ask me again tomorrow while only showing me the full map and I might guess it's in South America.
This is basically where I’m at. It’s mostly become a utility.
It's worth mentioning that there are dedicated processors, like m4, and templating engines, like Jinja, if you need something battle-tested.
> In the early days for me, it contributed a lot to my journey as a newly minted developer.

Yea, it is like a catapult. You need to let go of it at some point to keep moving forward, or it is going to pull you back or at least stop you from making further progress.

>but it started out well, not sure when or where it went completely off the tracks.

Good intentions or In this case, moderation. You know that I cannot go into detail here without pissing the moderators here, right? Yea, exactly my point.
Is that true in the EU? I think you are looking at global numbers.
What is this and what does it have to do with tildes?
that's likely why you're an ex-game dev if you didn't know about Halo 3
Here is a tweet from soon after Biden took office in January 2021:

> People must understand the depth of what’s happening here: the President of the United States has ordered a halt to deportations. ICE, a federal agency, is refusing to comply.

> There’s no reforming this rogue dept. It’s time for a new, just vision.

https://x.com/AOC/status/1354211627940384768

A month later she was criticizing DHS for still having Patriot act powers, and lumped ICE with the same criticism:

> People have been writing about the deeply concerning issues with the structure of DHS for a long time.

> This is from 3 years before I was even elected.

> It’s not “fringe” to ask why FEMA & ICE are in the same Dept operation. Or question ICE’s operations

https://x.com/AOC/status/1364619004921413633

A day earlier she called for the abolition of ICE:

> It’s only 2 mos into this admin & our fraught, unjust immigration system will not transform in that time.

> That’s why bold reimagination is so impt.

> DHS shouldn’t exist, agencies should be reorganized, ICE gotta go, ban for-profit detention, create climate refugee status & more.

This one is very apt given OP.

https://x.com/AOC/status/1364349732760518657

She continued, this on is in April 2021:

> A lot of people who are just now suddenly horrified at the dehumanizing conditions at our border are the same folks who dehumanize immigrants + helped build these cages in the 1st place.

> When we tried to stop this infrastructure over a year ago,we were overruled by BOTH parties.

> Fact is a lot of the politicians crying right now don’t work to solve either.

> They vote to grow ICE + CBP cages and they do everything to avoid addressing the root: US foreign policy and interventionism that destabilizes regions, the climate crisis, and unjust economic policy.

https://x.com/AOC/status/1377652851191787532

Your statement that Alexandria Ocasia-Cortez stopped protesting these private prisons while Biden was in office is simply factually wrong. And it was not hard to check it.
I never did as much thinking or testing of dropout on transformers as the author, but it didn't seem to help with my "baby" (~10 million param) transformer models. IIRC the latest Llama models don't use dropout either.
I wasn't planning on responding to this, because the sibling comment already points out that the ACLU's own explainer page is walking back its original description of it as the "Constitution-free zone".

Although while I'm here, I will note that they still don't discuss the fact that--as far as I can tell--all the regulations and laws means the 100 miles start not from the water's edge, but from the international boundary, which is 12 miles out to sea. And which also means Chicago is not in the 100 mile border zone, since the actual Canadian border is on the side of Michigan, well over 100 miles away.
Taking a position with established norms about how the job is to be done and taking direction from elected officials above you is one thing.

Interfering with elections to create a position for yourself and then using threats about further interference to bully the elected officials around you is quite another.
> not really awful, I just can't help but say fuck you to the other side in the current climate

No, you're saying "fuck you" to anyone and everyone who isn't waving their "I hate Trump" card right out of the gate. Near as I can tell reading through past comments, OP is in the sizable contingent that thinks that recent US politics has resembled nothing so much as an all-out war between toddlers and that left-wing hatred and bile like what you are manifesting bears at least some responsibility for getting us Trump in the first place.

It's possible to hate Trump, hate MAGA, and also think that the actions of liberals through the last decade directly contributed to the environment that led to his rise. Apparently that position counts as "the other side" to you, which is exactly what led us here: if there are only two sides then it's too easy to be a Trump supporter.
Some general feedback after trying it briefly a few minutes ago:

I suppose I'm slightly more geographically aware than average, but certainly by no means that good at geoguesser type games in the past. Even so, it felt way too easy for me. I got the first 40-50 correct before I closed it because it wasn't challenging enough for me.
The 2011 Australian Reserve bank study, the 2017 AHURI report, or the . . . ?
A nice middle ground is meters that take payment cards. That does exclude people who don't have them but most of those meters take apps as well, and the people who have neither a credit card nor a smartphone probably don't have a car either.

It is annoying though to have to install half a dozen different parking apps for the lots that have partnered with different app providers. It would be nice if public parking lot apps would interoperate.
Opinion pieces are journalism and regardless of the semantics that don't actually matter, it outlays information it presents as facts which are not true. It's a poorly written, poorly researched article, opinion piece or no.
From my very first google:

"In the five-year period from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020, there were 14 deaths reported to an Australian State or Territory Coroner where an electric e-micromobility device, including e-bike, e-scooter and electronic self-balancing device, contributed to the death"

"Seven of the 14 deaths were related to e-bikes); 7 deaths were in Queensland and 5 in Victoria (by jurisdiction of investigation); 6 deaths were in the age group of 35–44 years; 5 were females."

<snip>

"Last year the state recorded eight deaths related to personal mobility devices, including e-bikes and e-scooters, quadrupling the number from the previous year, with more than 3000 people presented to 26 emergency departments."

https://www.news.com.au/technology/motoring/unaware-huge-war...

In addition, the reporting is lacking in this area.

"Often, e-bike injuries are grouped with other road users: motorcycles, bicycles and e-scooter therefore making it difficult to track its use, correlates of it and any injury or harm from it."
> lets you stop breaking down one level up from what you're used to.

Can you provide an example of what you mean by this? I provide very verbose prompts where I know what needs to be done and just let AI “do” the work. I’m curious how this is different?
I read an article once that claimed an early draft/version that was cut for time or narrative complexity had the human brains being used as raw compute for the machines, with the Matrix being the idle process to keep the minds sane and functional for their ultimate purpose.
> another is to write to people why their insurance claims have been rejected

Health insurers are already using it to "assist" their claims reviewers decide to reject a claim.

One system I saw basically summarizes a claim, shows why it should be rejected, and asks the user to decide if these should be overridden.
https://lmarena.ai/?leaderboard
Is this the version of "generics" the C committee is leaning towards? Last I checked there were at least three other proposals [1] [2] [3].

[1] https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3212.pdf

[2] https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2924.pdf

[3] https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2853.pdf
Yes, because of severe supply constraints in the previous decades, there are not enough old units to go around and get cheaper. Rather they refurbish and rebrand as luxury as well. As its usually illegal to build new ones, there is no competition.
As a disclaimer, I don't know any country that is dealing with these kind of issues really well. Some don't have the struggle, but IMHO not just because of wise government and more thanks to historic or geographic position.

Destroying the political enemy has always been more important that anything else. Straight jailing "communists", jailing opposing minorities (crafting legal frameworks to do it or straight asking the army is to me the same), cutting funds from whole industries to help one's base and crush the other parties funds, taking money from enemy states to win domestic elections etc.

It's a matter of what you get flack for and what flies below the radar.

Developing countries have more visible incidents because their economy is more fragile and any political swing will have huge life and death ramifications. In contrast the US can afford waging trade wars without floods of people out in the streets.
Stop buying meat and eggs from supermarkets…
Agreed, but also where did those %'s come from? Seems like thin air so it's really all a gamble at this point.
Yeah I started with the shell script route because it felt like the best way to get familiar with it quickly. Then I'd probably go backwards to interactive usage.

The error messages did look very nice.

I have been considering dipping my toes into a less standard shell over the past few years. It is so so so hard to break away from the ubiquitous bullshit that most of us are stuck with. I have no love for the Bourne shell and its derivatives, although zsh is some nice lipstick on a very ugly pig.

The other candidates I'm aware of are fish, nushell and oils. I think nushell is the "most" different, but the last time I tried it, I bounced off of it for reasons I can't remember.
Bluebubbles requires running Mac hardware, or a Mac virtual machine, which if run on non-Apple hardware violates Apples ToS. You may not care about that but enterprises certainly do.

This is worlds away from twilio which will provide you with orders of magnitude more throughout and deliver it with SLAs.

And unless you imagine Apple will hardware certify pebbles, how does Apple determine the BLE endpoint is actually a Pebble? If you have a way to ensure that without a key registry and TEE controlled by Apple, congratulations — Turing award is incoming.

Upshot: You’re a hacker on a hacker forum - cool. Sending one to ten programmatic iMessages in a hack is easy for you. But you may not have all the experience necessary to opine on how that compares to accessing an enterprise grade hyperscale sms messaging solution: building those is challenging, the companies that do a good job are worth billions of dollars and they exist solely to allow bulk SMS. To think blue bubbles somehow dunks on the idea that these economies of scale don’t matter isn’t correct in my opinion.
Apple's App Store Refund policy:

Sell your $10 app, and get paid $7 by Apple. Customer disputes it, and you have to refund... $10 to the customer. Apple keeps their cut.
BYD's 5-minute charge: is time running out for electric-vehicle rivals?