skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Haha

You start with "ever" and then you go to "well, only until 40 for the military reserve service". Mental gymnastics at its finest.

BTW, when you reach a certain income level you never called for reserve. It's too expensive for the government to pay people like that.
I have helped people navigate government programs and the quality varies. The are often plagued with perverse incentives, abysmal administration, and ridiculous requirements. It can be worth trying, don't get me wrong, but the much better advice at this point for this person I really think is along the lines of finding better employment now that isn't freelance/gig-work to support a home and then building to what's next.
Thanks, corrected. I stopped supporting researchers in the 2000s.
It wasn't included in the blog, but marimo also supports a markdown format, in case you're interested:

marimo edit notebook.md
When communities are under attack, there really isn't a break though. Why do you think this rage exists? The fact it's here is not an indictment of HN and this community, it's an indication the rage has gotten out of control, and maybe we have to finally face it instead of seeking reprieve.
People would struggle to answer because "which side do you support in the hundred years war" is the wrong question. A better question would be "do you support the social structures (e.g. nationalism, monarchy, etc.) that contributed to the hundred years war".

Or stated another way, the premise implied by your question is incorrect. Its perfectly possible that both England and France were on the wrong side of history.
Dude, okay, so let's enter your Pokemon gym:

Your rules:

1) I cannot use my sensibility to look at the last 200 years (huh? okay.)

2) I need to now make sense of geopolitical beef between England and France around 1300.

3) Then I need to tie this all back to how this all leads to not be being able to determine, morally, what's going on today.

Are these the rules to becoming the pokemon master in your gym? I'll continue if I have all the rules down. I'm excited to attend your world class mental gym and get the greatest of all mental gymnastics training.
It's the exact opposite.

Tech platforms censored a lot of right of center content, thinking it would mean those ideas would disappear.

Instead Musk took over Twitter, right leaning podcasts became far more popular than left leaning podcasts because they were willing to engage in controversial topics, and now Trump and Musk control everything.

But, you know, keep trying the same thing and hoping for different results.

A thought experiment for you: how do you think the audience of Hacker News compares to Joe Rogan? And your focus is seriously on censoring more content on Hacker News to move the needle in national politics?
Thanks :) Europe is definitely on the roadmap.
Wait a few decades and you'll know.

If a research topic is obviously valuable, the industry is probably already working on it. Academic research mostly deals with topics where the benefits are too unpredictable or too far in the future to make sense for the industry. But many of those topics eventually become valuable – you just don't know in advance which ones.
Good catch - I definitely should’ve pointed out that I was referring to owners only. In that sense, it’s somewhat of a transfer of wealth from the rich to the poor.

For renters though, you’re absolutely right that they suffer much more directly.
Requiring an app to park my car is beyond stupid.
ScholarlyArticle: "Optimization by Decoded Quantum Interferometry" (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08292

NewsArticle: "Quantum Speedup Found for Huge Class of Hard Problems" (2025) https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-speedup-found-for-hug...
I definitely agree that for current models, the problem is finding where the LLM has comparative advantage. Usually it's something like (1) something boring, (2) something where you don't have any of the low level syntax or domain knowledge, or (3) you are on manager schedule and you need to delegate actual coding.
Fair enough, I think it's important people are realistic. Perhaps one could find an adjacent field that's heavily software related and try to sell their pivot that way. I believe he has Machine learning experience, which seems to relate to an increasing number of physical hardware fields these days.
> Evermore park in the US

Another great Jenny Nicholson review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9OhTB5eBqQ
I just prompted cursor to remove a string from a svelte app. It created a boolean variable showString, set it as false and then proceeded to use that to hide the string
In the same vein, I have a single-file library which allows you to use flat files as key-value DBs. Uses SQLite under the hood. Sharing in case someone finds it useful: https://github.com/aaviator42/storx
They are not prepared to have that conversation yet - still slumbering in 1972.
You need to consider all the energy spent to bring those calories to you, easily multiplying your budget by 10 or 100.
Same Astral as `uv` makers? Geez, these guys are specializing on "making things go zoom-zoom"!
Those that have tested it and liked it. I feel very confident with Sonnet 3.7 right now,if I would wish for something its it to be faster. Most of the problems I’m facing are like execution problems I just want AI to do it faster than me coding everything on my own.

To me it seems like o1-pro would be to be used as a switch-in tool or to double-check your codebase, than a constant coding assistant? (Even with lower price), as I assume I would need to get done a tremendous amount of work including domain knowledge done to come up for the 10x more speed (estimated) of Sonnet?
> All it will have is a first class war machine

And that won't last for much longer after losing those other sectors, either, as military dominance is a function of economic and technological superiority.
I think i just don't understand the distinction. I have a domain, so i set up my domain so i have an identity on bluesky. I'm with you on that part.

and then what? i can take my identity and do what with it? change PDS? but bluesky itself shows everyone that i am the same person?

i didn't move the goalposts, i just don't get the distinction everyone is making here with "identity", of course if i prove i own a domain i can verify, but i can do that on mastodon, too, I can add the below to my domain that will checkmark my username on mastodon. I assume if i move servers and want people to follow me, i will just do the same on that server, too; they know it's me because the service says so.

> <a rel="me" href="https://fosstodon.org/@picofarad">Mastodon</a>

that is all i have to do to prove i own that username on that instance - put that on a domain i own and add it to one of the user editable fields on my public profile.

so maybe you understand my confusion. i never received a bluesky invite nor do i want to pay (a couple mentions here of paying for it).

> Verifying your identity on Mastodon is for everyone. Based on open web standards, now and forever free. All you need is a personal website that people recognize you by. When you link to this website from your profile, we will check that the website links back to your profile and show a visual indicator on it. The link on your website can be invisible. The important part is rel="me" which prevents impersonation on websites with user-generated content. You can even use a link tag in the header of the page instead of <a>, but the HTML must be accessible without executing JavaScript.

i can also export all my followers, so when i join a new instance, i can direct message them all and let them know i've moved, and they can see it's the same person because the service says so, because i own the same domain.
We need just enough faith in our conjectures to do the work. And a little shit talk on the side.

What we don’t need is total control, children who smash other kids toys, sexism, bullying, drunk idiocy, and whining about long hours, derision of passion, or taunting people who try their best

There’s a lot to do and not much time given
One devious thing about this attack is that the phishing site doesn’t even need to impersonate the site it’s attacking. I have password based logins on hundreds of sites and it’s plausible that I’ll eventually have passkeys on enough sites that I can’t keep track.

Consider the airport attack. Rather than trick me to log with my social credentials, you could prompt me to sign up for a new account on hotspot.xyz. After I enter my email, tell me that the account exists and prompt to log in with passkey.

Now the attacker kicks off the connection targeting my Google credentials. Rather than a fake login screen, they present me with a QR code. From the user perspective, there’s nothing obvious to tell me this is a passkey flow with Google and so I wrongly assume that my passkey must be in my mobile keychain. I scan the QR code and get prompted to approve the login. If I read the block of text on my phone, I will see a mention of the RP (Google.com) but I’d guess most users aren’t looking that closely.

When all is said and done, my hotspot login attempt failed and I’m completely unaware that I just logged into Google on your behalf.
I think your first paragraph is closer to the truth. Going after the "commanding heights" of progressivism is the goal. That's also why the federal bureaucracy is being targeted.
I just made an open source CLI based chat client that supports MCP servers to solve this problem yesterday at https://github.com/Flux159/mcp-chat.

The issue I faced during MCP server development of my Kubernetes MCP server (https://github.com/Flux159/mcp-server-kubernetes) is that I wanted to be able to easily test changes to the server without having to deal with Claude Desktop. Realized that I could make a simple CLI client that lets me automate some of the testing & it just happened to also be a decent terminal based chat client for any production MCP servers too. Requires using your own Anthropic API key, but other than that it should "just work".
Not a lawyer,

They decide what to take or not themselves, I think for this at least 4 judges need to want to hear the case. Most cases come from underlying courts. I think for actual decisions it’s always full bench, but can be one judge for emergency decisions.

I think a lot of WH EOs will end up with Supreme Court. And it feels like some of them are made especially for this, maybe even to overturn SC precedents (like firing FTC board members).
Bingo.

In MAGA land, educational institutions are coded as woke and DEI infested.
It gets better! He has learned that when he is naughty we will tell him to stop. If he doesn’t, we will eventually get up to come over and make him stop (shoo him away).

So now he uses that when he needs us to open a door. Threatening to be naughty is the most effective way to get human to come over. Then you fly to the door and human gets the message and opens door. Or treat box or whatever you want help with.

Little shits
The guy was doing a search of slack channel dozen of times per day for months and months.

He was clearly willing to take risks.
Venezuela has historically not cooperated with deportations. They also actively send their criminals to the US.
Instead of koji, I use `aider --commit`
I've created a lambda and called it inline to force lexically scoped defer semantics. Works fine and reads fine imo.
> Most Western democracies are more safe and have a higher standard of living and score better on the Human Freedom Index

More safe I'll grant you.

As for higher standard of living, US salaries and purchasing power are higher than almost anywhere else, so I would need to see some citations to be persuaded.

How is the Human Freedom Index computed? Is Freedom of Speech included?
Facing it in this way isn't helping, it's just cementing the battle lines that were already in place and furthering the polarization and hatred which got Trump elected in the first place. We're not getting anywhere by spiraling into despair and anger—the kind of discussion that's been HN's staple recently is just serving to persuade people that democracy was doomed to fail after all because 50% of people are ignorant and hateful.
Whenever you experience a new pelican I always have to check it against your past pelicans to see progress towards the Artificial Super Pelican Singularity:

https://simonwillison.net/tags/pelican-riding-a-bicycle/
Huh? Disable PCs that people paid for? As in, people's personal property? That's a crazy idea. It's absolutely more ethical to let them act as malware nodes than damage them and kill people's livelihoods.
Teaching a new way to prevent outages at Google
Realistically for a production database you would use a clustering technology like Oracle RAC or SQL Server Always On Failover Clustering or Always On Availability Groups
I do agree what you said except the first sentence. The design of the Graph is super important. Pocketflow is for those with technical background.
I think you wait a few decades and you have thousands of people using their full brain power and attention to continue to secure that funding. And not just money - but a continuing affirmation that their work is valuable.

> you just don't know in advance which ones.

at the limit, this sounds like “you can’t question what’s good science because it’s unknowable, but it’s also a moral imperative to fund” which leads back to my original question. If that’s true, which projects and fields get to forgoe scrutiny in hopes of paying off?
You're right. This is a good reason to restrict this class of drugs. There is a finite usefulness, oh which each person who uses them consumes a tiny little bit.
This link is also referring to the nodes as agents. So its a system of agents interacting to product an outcome. I'm not saying this system is bad, just that I think it deserves another name rather than calling the whole system an "Agent". It's many agents working in a coordinated fashion.
Can't really take this seriously since they are 1. On substack 2. Zero mention of MCP
I've been seeing articles about these for a couple of years now. How long til I can buy a drone with one?
https://archive.ph/7EUea
One thing I'll say, is that if I was going to make people pay API costs (like cline/claude code) I probably wouldn't actually make an MCP. The MCP box is pretty limiting, and I'm only willing to pay the cost because that's how I get onto flat pricing structure.
I have a very capable smartwatch that I will not mention the brand once. OK.
Lots of opportunity in third-party AirPlay support. Smartwatch - we just saw the Pebble announcement. NFC emulation opens up for lots of payment scenarios. Background execution opens up access to all kinds of services that do not support APNS or need long-lived connections, and services like sync that had to rely on unreliable hacks like geofencing that get randomly denied by App Store approval. etc etc
Is that my job to prevent? If someone wants to do the most damaging things possible, to intentionally kill themselves, should I feel entitled to stop it?

People should be free to do stupid things, so long as they don't hurt others (the antibiotics example that another poster gave us a much stronger argument)
I thought I got a pretty good response- not o1: https://chatgpt.com/share/67db7ea5-f770-800e-bd6f-67945f5842...

Maybe you meant that it immediately went to USA specific, but you can always change your question to clarify.

Basically, if I'm unfamiliar with the topic this gives me a solid basis to ask begin to ask follow-up questions that use the terminology of the field, or start to find out what is regarded as important.

I actually find it quite easy to go deep into a topic in a way that would be impossible in wikipedia, simply because if the topic becomes too dense for me it's hard to navigate your way back out- the wiki article begins to read like gibberish. With an LLM you can simply ask it to rephrase or clarify something.
Current LLMs are already far beyond what a "prediction model" might be capable of.
This. I was a high schooler when I had winter Ramadan. Next time that happens in 2031 I'll be 46, and 62 in 2047 when it's in the middle of summer. If I'm lucky I might get one more winter Ramadan in 2063 or something, InshaAllah
I'd be interested to hear your original thoughts on why my position is incorrect.
Thanks. I hadn't appreciated the pick-and-choose quality. or the quorate 4 thing.

It feels quite unexpected in some ways to wind up here. the Run up, the proceeding 10-20 years was full of the current people pushing hard for a non-creative, non-inventive supreme court. Black Letter Law arguments were being run, and sold as the basis of how a future court would work. Maybe I overstate that but that is how I see it.

So now we arrive at a place where the WH and the SC are (it seems) bent on trying to re-define the legislative and WH powers landscape. and to do it they have to overturn anything up to 150 years of reasonably settled, black letter law, which says "this is how it works" -which means they have to be remarkably creative, inventive, and basically not do, what they said all along was the nature of their view of the nasty Democrats view of the SC and decision making.

Overturning why the FTC board is independent, isn't a small thing. It sure writes small, but I don't personally think in long term impact, this is just a minor footnote kind of deal (I don't think you implied that either btw)

This is "yea we said independent, but actually no: you aren't" kind of stuff. All those checks and balances which go to why you appoint independent boards, let stuff get run arms-length, they're all gone. If you get 4 years, you get to do pretty much whatever the hell you want, in those 4 years, is where this is going.

Wild.
What gives you any confidence in that transition happening in the best future?
The UK's war on encryption is dangerous – Meredith Whittaker
You blame dang for flagging you, but based on your comments in this thread I'd say you're bringing it on yourself from other users. Liberal, moderate, or conservative, anyone on HN who's interested in having a reasonable conversation will flag your comments if you regularly talk like this.

(And to be clear I'm not talking about the swearing, I'm talking about the totally off base assumptions made about OP's political stance and the level of aggression you're showing. It's time to log off and touch grass, dude.)
Side question, isn't this against their terms and conditions?
Where are we now on the LLM sigmoid? How can you tell?
How people feel is inherently complex and hard to measure, but we should mind there is a self-selection aspect where people moving to/staying in the US probably tend to care less about some of the racial history or democratic process.

What matters as "freedom" will wildly vary from a US domestic point of view vs an international or EU point of view. "People don't feel that way" is I think on point, regardless of the state of the country.

In particular as those really uncomfortable with the situation give up and move away.
Anyone succeeding with agents in production? Other than cursor :)
o1-pro can be very useful but it's ridiculously slow. If you find yourself wishing Sonnet 3.7 was faster, you really won't like o1-pro.

I pay for it and will probably keep doing so, but I find that I use it only as a last resort.
Flux Text Imaginator Multilingual Text-Driven Image Generation and Editing
What is FLUX Text Imaginator?
FLUX Text Imaginator is an innovative tool that leverages cutting-edge FLUX diffusion models to create and edit images with perfectly integrated multilingual text. Unlike other image generation models, FLUX possesses exceptional capability to naturally incorporate text in various languages including Korean, English, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, French, Spanish and more into images!

FLUX's Multilingual Text Processing Strengths

Superior Multilingual Text Rendering: FLUX renders text with amazing accuracy, including non-English languages and special characters
Perfect Korean Language Support: Accurately represents complex Korean combined characters
Excellent East Asian Language Handling: Naturally expresses complex Chinese characters and Japanese text
Sophisticated Text Placement: Precise text positioning using <text1>, <text2>, <text3> placeholders
Diverse Text Styles: Text representation in various styles including handwriting, neon, signage, billboards, and more
Automatic Translation Feature: Korean prompts are automatically translated to English for optimal results

How It Works

Text Generation Mode:

Enter your prompt (with optional text placeholders)
Specify your desired text in any language
Generate high-quality images with naturally integrated text using FLUX's powerful multilingual processing capabilities
Get two different versions of your image for each generation

Image Editing Mode:

Upload any image
Add editing instructions
Specify new text to add or replace (multilingual support)
Create naturally edited images with FLUX's sophisticated text processing abilities

Technical Details
FLUX's Core Technologies:
-Text-Aware Diffusion Model
-Multilingual Processing Engine
-Korean-English Translation Pipeline
-Optimized Pipeline
No. because the issues that France and England fought over do not serve any modern day political purpose. Nobody can use them to fuel their cause. But the idea that it’s due to “nationalism” still does which is why you are able to confidently boil down a hundred years into one word.

And once again, not me the absence of emotion. Saying “they’re both right” or “they’re both wrong” elicits nothing.
cool, listed on bskyinfo:

https://www.bskyinfo.com/tools/bluemigrate/
https://archive.ph/MVnuK
An australian study focused on our cities determined that up to 70% of a houses price is due to supply side issues. Largely zoning and land release.
Via Wiki, fwiw:

> Establishing policies on federal financial aid for education and distributing as well as monitoring those funds.

> Collecting data on America's schools and disseminating research.

> Focusing national attention on key issues in education, and making recommendations for education reform.

> Prohibiting discrimination and ensuring equal access to education.
You're confusing "vibes" with "data."

If you disagree with the data, present data to the contrary. If you're just insisting that we believe your vibes over others, that would just make for boring conversation.
I think "low-level" is relative to what's being discussed. Low-level for LLMs would have to do with how transformer layers are implemented (self-attention layer, layer norms, etc.) whereas low-level for agents would be the graph structure.

Although I personally don't think the graph implementation for agents is necessarily as established or widely standardized, it's helpful to know about why such an implementation was chosen and how it works.

> the inner workings of the processing, probing agents, and getting into the weeds

These feel to me like empty words... "inner workings of the processing"? You can say that about anything.
No, I know how awful my comments are so I expect them to be flagged and downvoted (not really awful, I just can't help but say fuck you to the other side in the current climate). It's better to look at my submissions.

Here's a simple one that was just flagged recently:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43405402

So if it's not Dang that's doing this, then there is a MAGA contingent here as far as I'm concerned. Some of you don't have the appropriate level of vigor quite frankly and might need more of those T boost shots Rogan tells yall to always get.
I would honestly like to read a treatise on why investment comes with Apple platforms first even though other platforms were there first, but we see it time and time again. Vision Pro is probably the first time that has faltered.

My guess would be it's a combination of Apple users spend more money, some chauvinism among investors (they all use Apple platforms), and that it's the largest single development target (android fragmentation is still real when it comes to messier stuff like hardware access and background tasks)
Can you expand on how errdefer works in zig? I'm not familiar.