skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If there is a procedure in place, you follow the procedure. You can argue how the procedure is ass backwards, but you don't just ignore the procedure because it's giving you bad vibes.

Especially with PII. Every junior I've mentored, every team member I've been responsible for, every one has gotten (thankfully, mainly preemptive) stern talking to regarding handling PII. Much better to be laughably paranoid for hundred times, than leaking some of the truly radioactive data once.
I don't really listen to much Spotify but I feel like just the free plan in Firefox with uBlock Origin gave me an ad-free experience the last time I used it.
If you liked the original, you should absolutely watch Age of Resistance. It’s not a masterpiece but it was clearly made by people that care about the original, its legacy, and its lore.
mailbox.org were good, but they decided to become more than just a mail provider and forced users into other, more expensive plans, adding office and cloud storage.

There is also posteo.de. It doesn't support custom domains, but I use it in combination with simplelogin.io (I think French, but now owned by Proton).
I mean, Waugh was a comic writer; if he was still around he probably _would_ be writing sitcoms. I don’t entirely buy his claims of truth here.
That's a lot of speed.
Typed Racket doesn't use H-M.
> Usually access and funds is _harder_ to find than alpha. So what’s more important is finding alpha (or whatever metric you are benchmarking against) that you can operationalize even if it’s worse on a risk adjusted basis than some other trade you can’t do.

Precisely, it’s about playing the hand that you have. My curiosity is why VCs are so indiscriminate with their funding. That said, if I had access to billions in capital to invest, maybe my perspective would be different.
The way I was taught to be on call by a guy I worked with that was also an SRE at a large software company was to "patch the hole in the tire and get it to the service center".

It wasn't about fixing the problem or fully understanding it, but instead making sure the system can run for the time being, get some sleep, and have a more complete triage in the morning. I've found this to work pretty well the past few years.

While I do agree with your sentiment, I'd say that the perspective I've learned about being on call is a big different than the one you've experienced (which may be the more common one, I'm not sure).

So this may end up being a cultural difference between on-call situations.
Whether or not Robinhood could do it isn't the right question. The better question is whether or not it would make sense for Robinhood or any other actor to front run microscopic retail trades.

Do you understand how front running helps the front runner and hurts the large volume trader? I think if you did, you would realize that Robinhood has no reason to do it.
yes, of course, I recognise that it is quite tricky to distinguish reliable products from those that can be defined as ‘junk’... that's precisely why I thought of giving each search a large amount of data referring to the product you are looking for at the ai in order to make a sensible ranking of the products and thus suggest only those most suitable for your needs. At the moment it is only an alpha, but the goal is to make it something that objectively can save a lot of time, avoiding returns and making users more aware of what they are buying.
Would also be interested in this. I don't know anyone who uses Wiz. Google says they had 350 million in revenue last year, aiming for 1 billion this year. So 100x revenue TTM. Crazy stuff.
A20 Chip for iPhones Said to Remain 3nm
>Someone putting a crap article on arxiv does not hurt anyone else,

But having a browsable collection of the verified non-crap articles on any given topic helps most everyone working in that area.
Freewrite Valentine
The people who aren’t doing that still produce way more than 24 hours of quality content per day. And for those who do, I’ll judge them based on what they make, not how I imagine they decide what to make.
I love that you've shared how you built it and been so transparent around pricing. I think anything that helps reduce asymmetry of information in the markets is a good thing, and I'm glad this exists. Just a question, what makes your approach different to: https://www.capitoltrades.com/politicians What made you want to build your own rather than use this site?
My wife is part of a union and there’s none of that bullshit. However when her employer wanted to reduce costs across the board the union negotiated a shorter working week for everyone instead of a pay rise next year. They voted on it and accepted it with an overwhelming majority.
Same. It’s wild that Google can’t sort that out
Show HN: I created a free tool to transcribe voice with AI for writing easily
I hated writing with keypads. I prefer talking to my phone. So I decided to use AI to help me write by simply mumbling something onto my phone
OP said content quality so I'm assuming the streaming is shittier quality than, for example, BluRay quality you might get from torrenting.
Maybe it is.

Or maybe the asinine "thing", is some folks lack of text comprehension skills that can't distinguish an experiment from a best practice recommendation despite a title and content that clearly does not invite that.
Israel is not committing genocide. Not by any reputable definition of genocide. Israel is waging war against an enemy who in fact clearly states their intention to genocide the Jews.

You are correct to be angry about the amount of people dying in this war. But you should direct your anger to those responsible for both starting the war and for directly endangering those people.
This blocking method also wouldn’t touch those. I’m comparing apples to apples. If you want to block ads inserted directly by video creators, you need something like SponsorBlock and to either DIY or rely on someone else to have done it before you.
Brett Domino wrote a song about this.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=UJHKB4arFNQ
Basically give it read access to your cloud account, and it will scan all of the resources to identify potential miss-configurations. Identifying CVE in software is one thing, but it's identifying incorrectly configured resources that would otherwise be secure can dramatically reduce the risk surface.

A lot of cloud providers already have little hints like "hey - did you mean to create this account in God mode?" or "It is recommended not to create this god mode json key file" - Wiz is taking this to the next level of detail
Usenet costs around $3/m if you find one on promo. You don't need a VPN for that as it's all encrypted. YouTube Premium family plan costs $22.99+tax per month in the US. While it's not free, it's very close.
Normally I'm more than happy to roll with someone's choice of words - if you want to use "literally" to describe things that are not literal, please, fill your skibidi or whatever, but I'm hostile towards it when it's an attempt to appease a corporation's filters. I get it, you gotta use it where you gotta use it, but I hate the indicators that our language is being filtered everywhere by certain social media's moderation rules.

That's not language changing because of fresh eyes, it's because of tired eyes looking towards the bottom dollar.
21th century will be remembered as the great digital drug crisis.
Should they have a problem with that? What problem would you have with me doing that with your comment?
IntelligentCross Midpoint (a darkpool) is a better example, since it actually does matching periodically every couple of milliseconds [1]. IEX just introduces additional latency for everyone.

[1] https://www.imperativex.com/products
I like the download-YT-content-locally then play. A project hit the front page recently that used yt-dlp to more or less do this.
Google has some amazing negotiating skills - paying 50% more for something they literally tried to get not even a year ago... (they tried to get it at 23 billing not even a year ago)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41042034

That being said, Instagram and WhatsApp were expensive for Facebook and those ended up being a steal. Time will tell, as usual.
It is a very legitimate tool. It identifies misconfigurations and vulnerabilities in cloud deployments. Anything from a container with a known-vulnerable package in the manifest to a workload with improper firewall rules.
I used mailbox.org for several years until they forced everyone into more expensive plans by adding irrelevant features like office and cloud storage. This kind of behaviour from them was disappointing.
I don’t see anything like that on https://youtube.com/premium
Yes, for some of them, but not all.

I've not been able to find a convenient online image showing the characters you get from holding down alt while typing, it may vary by layout, but for me this lets me type:

Number row: ¡€#¢∞§¶•ªº–≠ with shift: ⁄™‹›ﬁﬂ‡°·‚—±

First row: œ∑´®†¥¨^øπ“‘ with shift: Œ„‰ÂÊÁËÈØ∏”’

Home row: åß∂ƒ©˙∆˚¬…æ« with shift: ÅÍÎÏÌÓÔÒÚÆ»

Bottom row: `Ω≈ç√∫~µ≤≥÷ with shift: ŸÛÙÇ◊ıˆ˜¯˘¿

But of those, I only remember €, # (both printed on the key!), ∞, ƒ, ™, π/∏ (thanks to growing up with MacOS classic — Marathon Infinity for ∞, ƒ for folders, ™/π/∏ no idea why), and –/— (en-dash/m-dash, not sure why I learned them, but was one surprise source of compile-time errors around 2010 because they look exactly like - in a fixed-width font).
Serum 2
Will AI jeopardize science photography? There's still time for a code of conduct
Kinda confusing given Wiz is also a Google internal frontend framework.
> So what is happening right now is just a lot of denial. The honeymoon period between model providers and wrappers is over.
> In short the dilemma for most successful wrappers is simple: training or being trained on. What they are doing right now is both free market research for the big labs but, even, as all outputs is ultimately generated through model providers, free data design and generation.

This is a great observation on the current situation. Over the past few years, there's been a proliferation of AI wrappers in the SaaS space; however, because they're use proprietary models, they become entirely dependent on the model providers to continue to offer their solution, there's little to no barrier to entry to create a competing product, and they're providing free training data to the model providers. Instead, as the article suggests, SaaS builders should look into open source models (from places like Github, HuggingFace, or paperswithcode.com) or consider researching their own, and training custom models if they want to offer long-term services to their users.
The fundamental problem with UI/UX is that it’s so heavily dependent on your audience, and most software caters too disproportionately to one audience.

New users want pop ups, pretty colors, lots of white space, and stuff hidden. Experienced users want to throw the computer through a window when their tab is eaten because of a “did you know?” popup.

Enterprise, professional software is used a lot. Sometimes decades. You need dense UI with a UX that’s almost comically long-lived. Experienced users don’t want to figure out where a new button is, they’ve already optimized their workflow to the max.
Very timely.
I get that, but in that case it also makes sense to avoid YouTube altogether since you simply being there continues to deprive other services of the opportunity to compete. These days I think YouTube’s biggest competition is stuff like TikTok, which I find odious.
Also in the UK there’s https://utaw.tech/ and https://www.gameworkers.co.uk/

If there isn’t a union recognised in your workplace, you can build one yourself.
I ran an ipv6-only website because that's the only way I can have a publicly routeable address at home. Just as an anecdote.
Getting a handful of people to act differently is rarely the issue, especially if they think they’ll get rich by doing so.

The customer base continually expanding is the “tough” side of the equation. 100’s of millions of people behaving differently is the hard part of those “If everyone would just” plans.
So basically, assuming no special constructor for array, this is

fun all_same(array(str0, str, ...)):
all(=(str0, str), ...)

Which taking could just as well be rendered only using English words for each token:

let all-same of array of former eft latter eft more sam sam be
all of tie of former eft later sam eft more sam

Though "more" could also be replaced with "etcetera" or "etc" or "mo" for terseness or "and·son·on" for something more casual.

Admittedly some of these words are not very frequently used in English, but that can actually be a big plus for a programming language keyword. On the other hand all of these terms have a meaning recorded in lexicographic works that would make perfect sense for the context they are placed in each position above. And taking the exact opposite of the approach to carry so much semantic in non-phonetic symbols, that is making them as semantically as void as a space or a comment in code parlance, they can just as well be introduced again:

【let〖all-same｟of(array〚of[former„eft”latter„eft”⋮more⋮]sam〛)sam｠be〗⧘:⧙ {
all｟of(tie〚of[former„eft”later]sam〛„eft”⋮more⋮)sam｠∎
}】◼

Ok, a bit far fetched, but it does illustrate well what this reversed approach regarding soundless symbols can open in term of additional scriptural cues compared to the one which also will bind them to some semantic and syntax constraints.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/mo#Adverb

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sam#Adverb

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/eft#Adverb
Bad things happen in war- why risk it? We can both defend Taiwan and build fabs in the US.
Yeah I was upset at Altered Carbon being cancelled. It was very good. I've been hoping a video game studio picks up the rights and makes a good AA or AAA game. I sadly didn't find Altered Carbon: Resleeved as good as the main series.
big tech should be forbidden of purchasing anything, especially big 5
Nobody is frontrunning an order of 3 shares of SPY.
On Star Trek TNG they have what appears to be a bank of Fujitsu Eagle disk drives on the bridge to the right of the elevator. Looks like 10 for a total of 4.7 GB worth about $100,000! Those are so noisy, you'd think the'd put them in another room so they didn't have to work next to them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujitsu_Eagle

https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/chosen-one-of-the-day-those-c...
Out-of-control single point of failure?
Nice to see a writeup that includes the failures too
> I don’t think there’s a justification to arguing you own YouTube or the content.

This actually gets to the core of my sentiment. I am influenced by these systems, but I can't directly influence them back. I don't know if this is somehow wrong in principle, but I definitely want more.
As often happens in 3D printing, where the term often seems more like a marketing term than something informative, this is not open source by commonly accepted definitions. (The title here inappropriately says 'open source', as the page title does not.)

These models themselves are CC-BY-NC-SA, which is not open source because of the non-commercial restriction. Non-commercial is also vague, and my understanding is that with 3D printing some people using the license have even argued that NC prevents users from ordering prints from a print service rather than printing on their own printer, or prevents someone from being reimbursed for filament costs.

To make matters worse, however, these rely on Multiboard for mounting, which is decidedly not open source. Multiboard uses its own, long, proprietary license [1]. Amongst other things, it appears:

- you cannot print it for anything other than your own personal use (no printing for others, even for free), and agree to never give or even loan any printed items to anyone; you even agree that you won't 'encourage' third-parties to give physical prints to anyone else,

- you cannot publish modified versions unless they are "substantial", and you agree to license any of your modifications to them (their 'non-binding summary' says that license doesn't include selling them, but the binding license itself definitely seems to include it),

- you agree that you won't 'do anything at all contrary to the interests of' the company,

- the company can at any time, for any reason, terminate your (or everyone's) ability to make modified designs, and can also terminate your license entirely for any breach of the license (which, remember, would include doing anything at all contrary to their interests). It's not entirely clear what that termination would mean for physical prints: at best, it would make it impossible for you to expand a system you already have, though I would not be surprised if the company tried to claim it would prohibit you from using the items you've already printed.

[1]: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C0-Iyxydqk_d2I3o_5ualJ9Y...
Yeah, basically the size of a hockey puck. And priced a lot lower than a laptop of course.
I find the distinction you draw between weights and a program interesting - partially the idea that one is a “static file” and the other isn’t.

What makes a file non-static (dynamic?) other than +x?

Both are instructions about how to perform a computation. Both require other software/hardware/microcode to run. In general, the stack is tall!

Even so, I do agree that “a bunch of matrices” feels different to “a bunch of instructions” - although arguably the former may be closer in architecture to the greatest computing machine we know (the brain) than the latter.

</armchair>
> and the unknowable

This is the crux. Sure, for high level software (e.g. Web apps), many parts of the system will feel like black boxes, but low-level software does not generally have this problem. Sure, sometimes you have to deal with a binary blob driver, but more often than not you're in control of or and to debug most all of the software running on your system.

> Building a bridge

There should NOT be significant unknowns when you're building a bridge, this is how people die. You turn those parameters into "knowns with high confidence", which is not something you can even begin to do for the LLM parameters described above.
I think that it connects to influencer culture and tech platforms. Every business is now about getting an audience, then selling access to that audience.

This seems like a fair deal to me. If nobody wants to pay for what they consume, but everyone still feels entitled to it, you sell the audience instead of the content.
Ok, that was fun. Pipped Ginko to the win by one point, they should've calculated the last square was a flag faster than I did.

It'd be cool to be able to put your own name in though, without signing in. Just a suggestion.
We switched to self hosted gitea, so far so good.
It's not about filters, I like using unalive in the context of suicide when I have no sympathy to the person who dies. It's such a nice dehumanizing word.
It's an alternative to Proton because it doesn't support open standards (like IMAP), but it has the same problem - vendor lock-in.
Show HN: Days
If they do it in private, then yes you might call it a lame insecurity.

If they do it only at public events where they're constantly being photographed in groups of people, it's smart image control. A leader is a symbol, and different height differences project different messages visually. That doesn't mean you need to be the tallest, but being the shortest in every photo may give voters a perception that works against you. It's not vanity; it's reality.

Actors stand on apple boxes all the time in film and TV shows, because the director wants a specific height difference between characters to arrange a shot just right, that isn't the actual actors' height difference. Not lame insecurity -- it's producing the image that communicates what you want.
I'd do `/aaa<enter>cw<replacement text>`
I can't help feel like this will be rolled into GCP and quickly lose support for Azure and AWS and then just die. That's a lot of money to spend to kill off a business.
> Sure, there’s a lot of crap. But you don’t have to watch that.

The way people complain, I genuinely think they don't know about this option.

For example, Mr. Beast content isn't for me. But I was also living blissfully under a rock for years without knowing who the heck he was. Now that I know about him I simply don't click on his content and therefore never see it in my feed.

"But what if I click by accident?" - glad you asked. Simply delete it from your watch history and see your recommendations improve.
So your whole argument is just cherry picking? Sure if you ignore everything wrong, you can say the system is alright.
The Trump admin has shown the same attitude as the Biden admin when it comes to mergers. So why do they think the merger will go through this time?
Or the Start of the Digital Drug Era.
YouTube premium also includes ad-free YouTube Music. Yes there are still sponsorships in podcasts as usual, but no injected ads.
This is the article I link my developers whenever I see them making this mistake "Don’t try to sanitize input. Escape output." https://benhoyt.com/writings/dont-sanitize-do-escape/

Its been fairly effective at making them realize the fundamental mistake they are making. Quoting the key part:

> The only code that knows what characters are dangerous is the code that’s outputting in a given context.

> So the better approach is to store whatever name the user enters verbatim, and then have the template system HTML-escape when outputting HTML, or properly escape JSON when outputting JSON and JavaScript.

> And of course use your SQL engine’s parameterized query features so it properly escapes variables when building SQL
I love the film. The film is a real masterpiece.

I'm struggling to get through the series. That ultra clunky opening narration is not a great sign and the world building and underlying plot feels shallow in the series.

I'd LOVE for more Dark Crystal content but I would like them to start over...
I don’t feel sorry for corporations being spied on by each other. They do this to their own employees to exert control and the general public to make a buck all the time.

I couldn’t care less about this. Honestly the shit corporations pull on the daily in 2025 shouldn’t be considered normal.

Why should I be worked up about this?
BigID Accelerated Threat Detection and Response, with Reco
If you have not been reading every OpenAI blog post, you can't be blamed for thinking the model picker affects Deep Research, since the UI heavily implies that.
It’s a security-as-a-service platform that monitors whatever clouds or systems you plug into it for security vulnerabilities, but is built specifically for public cloud service providers and their workloads. I quite liked the product, as it would notify my team of erroneous configurations, outdated AMIs, exposed ports, vulnerable workloads, and whatever custom policies we setup (e.g., SSH open between VPCs in AWS, rather than via a Jumpbox).

I loved the product when I used it (huge improvement over Nessus), and am immensely disappointed Google owns it as it means I’ll have to find something else going forward. This is the sort of acquisition a regulator should block, because Wiz really is best-in-class at what they do for every cloud they support, and customers benefit more from it being agnostic.
I'm sure they appreciate the extra time in space, but remember they live human lives as well. They're both married, and Butch has two kids.
The voters disagreed and elected an extremely big tech friendly government.
> When they fix the "buy" button to actually mean "buy", and when they remove ads from "no ads" plans, i might reconsider. Until then, they're not getting any of my money anyway, piracy or not.

This pretty much sums it up for me. I lost so much money over the years for so much content I technically should still "own access to".

And not just media, games and books, too. It's so ridiculous how important things like anna's archive have become because otherwise science would be so crippled that it wouldn't even function anymore.
The Case for Centralizing Authorization
She may have created the account abroad.