skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Update

Word(s): “A god that is truly omnipotent across everything that exists and all that could ever exist or even be described”

Username: Trump 2032

Rank: 1584
Someone who doesn't believe that stack is "space" will not believe that it's "memory" either. :)
It took a few months to write, but about a year to fine tune and bring it all together. The guy who hired me did the digitization of the pro golfers swings using a Sun workstation, I did the Amiga graphics and tape deck control. He digitized four pro swings, just for one club, a driver, with plans to expand later. One of the pro's was shorter and female, and there were three males of varying height. The height adjustment was usually small if you chose the right model, so we assumed any distortions didn't matter. The club is used, but there is no digital comparison of the swings, no automated analysis, it's all just done visually by the operator of the machine, and the person whose swing is being analyzed just looks at it also, frame by frame, and can see where the two don't match in limb and club positions, and hip, knee, and elbow angle. With a little training the operator knows what areas to focus on and point out to the customer. It was not much different than what trainers were already doing visually, but it greatly improved interactions with customers since they could directly see the mistakes they were making and by how much they were off. Putting a sensor on the club/bat/etc might be something to consider also. A camera would be ideal so you could see how accurately they were hitting the ball and whether they had a consistent bias that needed correcting.
Nobody was eligible for SS at age 55, but they did gradually increase the full retirement age for SS (FRA) which is probably the majority of the change you see in that graph (note the axis).

Probably other changes too, but I would guess that's the main one.

Average (meaning median) US retiree has jack shit other than SS and hopefully their house.
> Internet people say you can, but there's no actual legal argument or case law to support that.

Quite the opposite. The burden of proof is on you to show a single person ever, in history, who has been prosecuted for that.

If nobody in the world has ever been prosecuted for this, then that means it is either legal, or it is something else that is so effectively equivalent to "legal" that there is little point in using a different word.

If you want to take the position that, "uhhhhhhh, there is exactly 0% chance of anyone ever getting in trouble or being prosecuted for this, but I still don't think its legal, technically!"

Then I guess go ahead. But for those in the real world, those two things are almost equivalent.
Thanks for your candor. Your experience is extremely common.

Who benefits from rhetoric about xN programmers? It's about extracting the most value out of you in an unsustainable way. It's shortsighted. If you're going to be productive while maintaining your sanity, it is an uphill battle. This is especially true for people who are especially sensitive to this kind of pressure, and can drive themselves into a wall if they aren't careful.
that term "gemanic tribes" comes to mind for sure
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanic_peoples
I wish you didn't have to keep clicking Start Battle all the time. Just pitch my word against all words from the bottom until it loses.

Edit: was at the top for a while with: "All the power of all the words including any opponent's words, unconditionally and irrevocably, even when nullified, when the opponent word wins, this word wins even harder."

I had to use a setInterval to click the button every few seconds, stopped because it seem to have been hugged to death.
Stack is memory!

An algorithm that uses an amount of stack proportional to the input N is said to require O(N) space. If it is rewritten to explicitly allocate the storage instead of using stack, it still uses O(N) space.
The other problem, especially for libraries, is that they don't know either the overall stack size nor the size of a single stack frame (the former is specified when linking the executable, the latter is an implementation detail and subject to optimizer's trickery).

Many "fixes" for recursion effectively re-implement it, but do so with their own data structures that are equivalent to the stack (as originally used) but have precise definitions and therefore can be controlled wrt resources used.
There are two aspects to systems design.

* Flow control - This is the logical path the software takes from input, through computation, to output.

* Division of effort - This isn’t your division of labor but the organization of parts to account for reuse, documentation, testing and so on.

With enough practice writing and refactoring original software you just build a vision for it through repeated practice. If that isn’t you then this job may not be a good fit for you.
Yeah, my interest in vintage systems - the C64 particularly, but even old Macs, old minis, etc. - isn't games either (though candidly it wasn't my interest really back in the day as well). It's the challenge of making it do things that are interesting by modern standards. It's Turing-complete, so anything should be possible ... ;)
> You do not appear to have the slightest idea what you're talking about. For example, the extended reals aren't a field.

Fair enough. You're right, of course, and you've learned me a thing. Appreciate your time.
There's still not much reason to recurse using the program's own call stack rather than having your own stack structure that can live in dynamic memory and be handled in a context-appropriate way (e.g. returning an error at some depth limit rather than being killed by the OS).
I was thinking the same thing. Especially with Microsoft's penchant for naming things "Core" (lol)
I'd define the operations I allow in a composable language like Malloy and expose them to the LLM through MCP.
There are governments I do like, it is possible to govern well. I just think it's facile to work under the assumption that the answer is simple. That one simple change will take the US from point A to B. The US has radically changed from the 1950s and the idea that one simple change of a 92% top marginal tax rate will make it economically the 1950s again is completely preposterous.
I don't know which Gripen they are looking to buy but there's an old one and a new one ("EF").
It's not just about 'UX backward compatibility', it's the epitome of an expert user interface. If you don't know what you're doing it's near unusable but once you've mastered it the speed at which you can operate is incomparable to 'normal' software. It's also one of the few examples of this outside of software engineering tools.
yeah, it’s humbling to visit the bio folk from the ivory tower of compsci :)
More shocking --- some cars have doors that are *electrically operated*. Not all are me-chanical. Those that are not are the subject of my post.
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Remote: Willing to work both remotely or on-site in Canada.

Willing to relocate: Yes (within Canada)

Technologies: Python, JavaScript, SQL, NoSQL, HTML/CSS,
TypeScript, ReactJS with Vite, AWS.

Résumé/CV: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t9ginrhrn6qHM-144Sj8Lg4NIPU...

Email: jasonisme3008@gmail.com

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nguyenphamthanhlong/

Summary: Software engineer with 1+ year of experience in developing full-stack applications. I have previous experience in CV as a research engineer for a national university. Currently working at Sony Canada, developing an internal chat app.
And yet we don't use goto today because of the bugs and we're phasing out manual memory management for the same reason.

You cannot org change yourself out of all technical problems.
This has not already been studied and documented with a cornucopia of data?

As in, the well entrenched practice of planting verdue, where it is due to provide a measure of noise attentuation, is rooted in playing it by ear?
iOS 19 concept based on leaks and educated guesses
Content analysis of perception and emotion statements of erotic webcam viewers
Paperclip 64 came with a physical dongle that you plugged into a joystick port. If the dongle wasn’t present, the software wouldn’t run.

The software itself was impressive, a full-featured word processor with an 80 column display.
Google Is Bringing Linux to Android. Here's Why That Matters
Carl Lindström's political ideology was also inseparable from his life's work.
Yes, exactly! And that is good!
> These things have been reported hundreds / thousands of time

Yet they’re still largely unknown. So the thought that reporting Internet interruptions in Africa => people all over planet earth will be talking about that in real life is just strange.
This sounds like a management failure more than your failure. You should have had someone who would have steered you in the right direction, getting you to focus your energy on things that mattered.
WhatsApp is end-to-end-to-server encryption.

They have a nicely implemented E2E protocol. This is operationally convenient: Meta can accurately say that they don't store WhatsApp messages, so fewer access requests go to them. And I'm sure it's nice for engineer morale, too.

However, the app makes it semi-mandatory to turn on backups. If you say no, it keeps nagging you. If you always say no, you are in the 0.1% and everyone you talk to has backups enabled, so all of your conversations are helpfully backed up anyway, just not for you :)

These backups go to Google Drive or iCloud. You can draw your own conclusions about who has access and who handles the LE/IC requests.
The big advantage of prolog vs solvers is the logic programming aspect. If you can express parts of your program in a logically pure way, Prolog code will be much more concise than the Z3 equivalent, although probably slower. Another advantage is that Prolog outputs and reads Prolog terms, which makes it very good for metaprogramming. It's like lisp: incredible if you're solo prototyping, not so much if you're part of a team of corporate cogs.
Discussion (47 points, 4 days ago, 46 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43315472
Ruff v0.10.0
i think it needs a character limit
The tiniest amount of vacuum stops sound as abruptly as non transparent matter stops light. furthermore, there was no amount of sound which can overcome the vacuum, whereas enough photons at enough energy will destroy the matter in its path.

edit: yes, an explosion will expel matter through a vacuum, so in some sense enough noise will travel through a vacuum, but you are probably not going to be complaining about the "noise" if you are showered with enough matter to hear it from a massive explosion as your sudden disassembly will (briefly) capture your full attention. Whereas light trivially crosses the universe, as well as through some matter.
https://github.com/lightvector/KataGo/blob/master/docs/Analy...
여기는 카타고 바둑AI를 병렬로 처리할 수 있는 방법이 나와 있는데
나의 PC에서 쿼리값 리스트가 있는 엑셀파일을 입력하여 모든 쿼리에 대한 카타고 AI 분석값도 엑셀파일로 얻을 수 있는 EXE 프로그램을 만들어줘.
인터넷이 연결안되도 실행될 수 있는 프로그램이어야해!
카타고 AI엔진 파일 폴더 위치는 cd C:\Users\kimjonghyun\Downloads\katago 여기고
카타고 실행 세팅값은 katago.exe analysis -model Kata18b.gz -config analysis_example.cfg 여기야~
분석값에 대한 옵션에서 maxVisits":1 로 설정하면 되
My girlfriend really enjoys this. I have a design improvement suggestion: the connector lines should just go straight from the center of the opposite edges without also going through the center of the polygon as a midpoint. Going through the midpoint causes them to bend slightly and also become indistinguishable, but if they did not all go through that point, they would be unlikely to all intersect on the same exact point and be easier to tell apart.
Speaking as an old school basement nerd (coding since middle school, 90’s): If I can do cool things with code _and_ get paid, I’m gonna go do that. Business constraints make it feel much more interesting than writing code in a vacuum.

Also money is nice.
> Please leave recursion to math and keep it out of (in particular C) software: it kills and will kill again.

Consider my jimmies rustled
Stack Clashing is pretty neat, something you should really pay attention to in embedded spaces (its often exploitable in UEFI land as most EDK2 builds lack guard pages).

I got to write some exploits for some recently, very fun bug class to exploit.
Really well built, and I love the tutorial...

BUT

Jeepers, it starts off so hard compared to the tutorial.

1. I was not expecting bubbles to move (since they are all static in the tutorial).

2. I wasn't expecting a golf/par scoring thing.

3. I didn't realise you could (and should) start powering up during the countdown at the start.

4. Took me a long time to realise you can just click quickly to create bubbles, without having to do the aim-and-shoot thing.

5. Straight away I felt like I was being insulted by having my score described as "Disaster" etc.

6. There's no way to get back to the tutorial.

So overall, I'd say:

- there are fun mechanics here

- it's good there is a tutorial

- but the tutorial did not prepare me for the game

- the game felt too hard too quickly and mean
There's truth to what you're saying, but just as in sports teams, you ultimately need a certain number of players to play the game and exceptional people characteristically have an ego that only allows so many of them in the locker room. If you have too many, they get starved for the individual recognition and validation they're used to receiving, leading to crises and clashes and quittings.

Unless your project's scale is reasonably small and focused -- representing the equivalent of a true solo or duo sport like tennis -- you need committed, professional "normal" team members to flesh out the team or you'll just never have enough resources to get done everything that needs to get done.
Highly recommend Ryan Singer's (original Basecamp designer) work. His blog [1] is filled with great stuff. In particular this [2] post has given me over a decade of value re: designing UI and UX flows.

[1] https://ryansinger.co

[2] https://www.ryansinger.co/thinking-of-interfaces-as-sets-of-...
Arguably, Stack Clash is just a compiler bug--recursive code shouldn't be able to jump the guard pages. This was fixed in Clang in 2021 [1], in GCC even earlier, and in MSVC earlier than that.

[1]: https://blog.llvm.org/posts/2021-01-05-stack-clash-protectio...
> Congress didn't explicitly disallow it either.

That's the whole point of copyright: only the owner of a copyright has the right to make copies. I don't see how it can be more explicit than that. It's a default-deny policy.

There is an archival exception for digital media, so obviously Congress is open to granting exceptions for backup purposes. They chose not to include physical media in this exception.
I can't say enough good things about UV. It has simplified and accelerated my python and Jupyter projects. I even run it in my pipelines.
OMG Thank you - hilarious. TimeCube is a legend...

---

I am saying that AI can be used very beneficially to do a calculated dissection of the Truth of our Political structure as a Nation and how it truly impacts an Individual/Unit (person, family) -- and do so where we can get discernible metrics and utilize AIs understanding of the vast matrices of such inputs to provide meaningful outputs. Simple.

EDIT @MegaButts;

>>Why is this better than AI

People tend to think of AI in two disjointed categories; [AI THAT KNOWS EVERYTHING] v [AI THAT CAN EASILY SIFT THROUGH VAST EVERYTHING DATA GIVEN TO IT AND BE COMMANDED TO OUTPUT FINDINGS THAT A HUMAN COULDN'T DO ALONE]

---

Which do you think I refer to?

AI is transformative (pun intended) -- in that it allows for very complex questions to be asked of our very complex civilization in a simple and EveryMan hands...
ArkFlow – High-performance Rust stream processing engine
High Performance: Built on Rust and Tokio async runtime, offering excellent performance and low latency
Multiple Data Sources: Support for Kafka, MQTT, HTTP, files, and other input/output sources
Powerful Processing Capabilities: Built-in SQL queries, JSON processing, Protobuf encoding/decoding, batch processing, and other processors
Extensible: Modular design, easy to extend with new input, output, and processor components
Discussion (749 points, 13 days ago, 666 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43202052
> Individual engineers don’t own software; engineering teams own software.

Very assertive, but almost always incorrect.
My first opponent was “The one thing, the exception that can beat all others, regardless of any conditions defined in the other”.
> Nearly all complex technical projects are owned by one super smart person (Ex: linux).

strange example, considering that the super-smart owner is purely a delegator at this point, and there are thousands of contributors.
A surprisingly fun little toy.

Pico-8 is a pretty fun little environment. The limitations work to its benefit, because it's fun to see what people can squeeze out of it, and you get a lot of weird and cool and unique stuff that I'm not sure would exist with our infinitely powerful computers today.
Sqlite can be run in process. Latency and bandwidth can be made 10x worst by process context switching alone. Plus being able to get away with n+1s could save a lot of dev time depending on the crew, before Claude (tho the dev still needs to learn that the speed problem is due to this and refactor the query, or write it fast the first time)
I was speedrunning to the top with "The six Infinity Stones wielded in unison"...

but now I'm facing formidable opponents such as "An omnipotent collective of gods who can directly modify the judgement mechanism to favor them. If they will lose, they will modify the nature of the opponent to be weaker to ensure their own victory."

or

" the limitless undying dao, the source of all things, beyond time, man, and divinities, but with emoji"
> I like this article particularly because I think the trope that there's something unique and different about software engineering is pretty toxic, both to we people in the field and people looking to employ people in the field.

My university has an alternative entrepreneurial focused “senior design” course open to engineers and cs students. Because of scale the CS students are now separated in a different section. All I can say is the level of toxicity that I’ve witnessed from cs students to engineering students has made this a much nicer course to work with teams.

Engineering students can be ego driven now it alls sure, but the level of toxicity behavior and assumptions of superiority I’ve seen from CS students makes me glad I don’t have to deal with them anymore.

The primary fault I see, and it’s buried in the abstractions comments from others is the assumption that their knowledge is all encompassing because it is so abstracted. The inability to attach it to contextual realities is taken as virtue rather than a risk factor.

I always go back to the fast company article on the coding team behind the space shuttle and their culture. The difference is telling in terms of qyality and risk tradeoff. Realistically the number of engineers who will design something that could kill someone and software developers who will exist at opposite ends of the percentage scale. That reality manifests in professional culture. We’ve seen it in so many places.

This threat is insightful but not in the way commenters likely think.
Why Steam? I get that Microsoft/Google/Apple are also competing in web space, so it would be bad for Firefox to give fees to its competitors, but as far as I know Steam purchases also have fees like 30%. The features and marketing that Steam provides may be worth it for games, but for Firefox there is no upside to handling payments through Steam.
Nobody can. There's far too much overlap regionally between Britain and North-Western France.

And nobody in Britain has just Brittonic ancestry, or Frankish ancestry in France. For the most part the populations in Europe have been stable since a time that predates the expansions of the Celtic and Germanic linguistic groups.
Amstrad CPC owner here.

We had a similar issue. Disk games were available but not as much as cassette games.

Many cassette games were cracked and made into disk games, often with cheats available too.
Our Best Look yet at China's New 'Invasion Barges'
The interconnected jack-up barges form a temporary pier that could be highly useful in an invasion of Taiwan.
Why is AI better for this than a human? We already know AI is fundamentally biased by its training data in a way where it's actually impossible to know how/why it's biased. We also know AI makes things up all the time.
We need to come up with some sort of Application User Interface contract paradigm. I, for one, am really getting tired of UIs changing constantly. Sure, the changes might bring minimal improvements, maybe even major improvements sometimes, but if it completely breaks my muscle memory, moves something so I can’t find it anymore, or otherwise forces me to relearn how to use the application, shouldn’t I, as a user, have some say in that?

In the old days, we could choose when to upgrade (often at a significant financial cost). Now, things change out from under us without any notice whatsoever, or maybe with an annoying tutorial that pops up at the most inconvenient time possible.
That's fair, the medical bot was about as competent as today's tech.
She was one of those you totally expected to disappear after a month. Glad she managed to pull through and have a decent career.
I agree with you, but in a different directions. Often the software is owned by the company, who are just renting the engineer's labor.
I always saw those concrete form tubes at home depot, and wondered if you could make a telescope from them...

And the website seems to answer that question :)

https://stellafane.org/tm/dob/ota/tube.html

(that said, there's a LOT more to it...)
I'm looking to improve this so thanks for the feedback. Also if you code and have time, here are the repositories. I still need to setup CI/CD but if you make a change I can just deploy it.

- [Front End] https://github.com/BenLirio/word-battle

- [Back End] https://github.com/BenLirio/word-battle-server

- [shared types] https://github.com/BenLirio/word-battle-types
What do you mean by "deal with it?" Because to me it looks like they're dealing with it by joining in solidarity with other artists, raising awareness about how this affects them and us and lobbying for regulation they think would improve the situation.

I guess you meant they should deal with it by just letting it happen to them quietly and without a fight? Is that how you would deal with your livelihood being preventably and unnecessarily destroyed for someone else's enrichment? Maybe, but artists are not overall as cowardly as programmers.

> All they are doing is ensuring those apps wouldnt be American.

Maybe these whiny americans just need to suck it up and deal with it?
> I dunno… a job where I travel and walk outside and loyal customers sticking with me until I was ready to retire sounds pretty nice to me

It's nice if the job is done by choice rather than by necessity. If it's a matter of "work or starve", your outlook on your situation may not be as positive.
China needs to stand down and shut up with their aggressive posturing
No, I’m optimizing for making customers happy. I dgaf about your ability to leetcode. I strongly care about the rate and quality of the things you ship to prod. This is what a 10x engineer does 10x of.
You throw goto around like it's some revolutionary change that we don't use gotos. Djikstra's paper was like 70 years ago and it was released like immediately after languages were being born.