skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Do you feel an injustice has been perpetrated against you? The Canadian attitude towards admission vis a vis DUI convictions predates the first Trump administration by a lot.

OTOH Victoria schoolchildren used to do cross border field trips. They ended the practice during the Trump Muslim ban to avoid trauma to kids.
Given the correction, can you edit your initial comment?
>Restricting what people can do with the software you write doesn't sound very free

It depends on POV, user freedom or developer/publisher freedom.
To make it easy to understand, I remember a quote from some book where a french and USAian were debating about what country is fmore free and slavery and the USAian says "We are more free since we are free to own slaves"
often the unsafe code is at the edges of the type system. e.g. sometimes the proof of safety is that someone read the source code of the c library that you are calling out to. it's not useful to think of machine code as safe or unsafe. safety often refers to whether the types of your data match the lifetime dataflow.
> Had they slept on the Vision Pro

2025 versions of iOS, iPadOS and macOs are all being redesigned based on VisionOS, despite VisionPro production and successor cancellation.
We should have more friction in our lives
This should be in “not the onion”.
Is the disagreement because you somehow believe the Taliban are "civilized" or does one have disagreement about the fact that a person claiming not to believe in human rights is in no position to argue against being tortured?
Would you happen to haven any write-up on how you configured such a setup? Or some links to posts you found useful to set this up?
I've built .exes for Windows just fine on Linux. I don't know about Apple stuff, though, I don't think there's any built-in Linux tooling to submit an executable for Apple's signature scheme.
Which is so underused that the whole compiler feature was buggy as hell, and was only recently fixed because compiling Rust where it is the norm exposed it.
Restricting people's freedom to restrict other people's freedom ensures maximum freedom overall. That's why we have prisons for thieves and killers.
Here's some background: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2g8v32q30o
Wake on LAN should work from S5 (off), as long as you leave the power supply switched on; but the EU ErP very low standby power setting usually needs to be off.
They could have waited with the vision pro too. Just keep the tech in their back pocket until they could release something that was viable for consumers.
Once there's violence targeting you, the politics is over and a different kind of problem solving begins.

If someone has attacked you and there has been no apology or attempt to solve the situation, he must be eliminated. Once he's done it, he may well try again, in which case you might die. Better then to get rid of him.
I have bad news for you. This is cut-and-paste directly from reader mode in Firefox mobile.

"Then came terminals and command lines. Physical knobs turned into typed commands—more powerful, but our digital world became less embodied. Then came terminals and command lines. Physical knobs turned into typed commands—more powerful, but our digital world became less embodied. Then came terminals and command lines. Physical knobs turned into typed commands—more powerful, but our digital world became less embodied. Then came terminals and command lines. Physical knobs turned into typed commands—more powerful, but our digital world became less embodied. Then came terminals and command lines. Physical knobs turned into typed commands—more powerful, but our digital world became less embodied. Then came terminals and command lines. Physical knobs turned into typed commands—more powerful, but our digital world became less embodied."

I stopped reading after that. There are also missing full stops, which means it's difficult to understand what's happening.
I think that's inline with what the point the GP was trying to make. Tear gas would otherwise fall into the definition of a weapon that would violate the Geneva Convention if not for the specific earmark that its okay for law enforcement to use it.

Its a bit of a logical loop based only on definitions. Its not against the convention because the law includes the exception, but the exception otherwise goes against the principles of the convention.
Huh, I totally forgot about Pivotal Tracker. There was a phase where every project I was on used it.

The killer feature was the UI. When the alternative was basically JIRA, Pivotal was so quick and easy to use. That front page view that let you see every task in a compact list, and easily drag things around to reprioritise was pretty revolutionary.

Now it seems kind of passé but it really was pretty excellent at the time.
You mention Tcl’s lack of language server support - just a shameless plug for my own project that’s working on fixing this: https://github.com/nmoroze/tclint/blob/main/docs/lsp.md

It’s not quite “complete” with respect to all the usual LSP features (just does linting and formatting for now), but it’s a starting point!
if you don't get the sarcasm, I can't help you.
The news is that they're pushing more code onto your machines that has hooks back to Microsoft's data centers. It doesn't matter how much they pinky promise that they won't use this without your consent, they're not trustworthy or competent enough for any such promise to be believable. It's better if the code simply isn't there at all.
I've kept every version of Windows and major releases of popular Linux distros, but didn't know exactly what to do with them other than test certain things when I'm teaching someone an ecosystem.

Add binary storage and versioning to the list of reasons I keep my NAS going.
No needs. GNOME has and always will have a worse UI/UX than Apple.
If it's GPL, or AGPL, someone can sell a copy on Amazon, but it's pretty pointless because the person who buys it is allowed to give away more copies for free.

If it's MIT, the person who buys it ISN'T allowed to give away more copies for free if the seller doesn't want them to. MIT means SOMEONE ELSE can (for all practical purposes) copyright YOUR software, and all you get is your name in a notices.txt file.
Chemical weapons are tactically useless to the American combat doctrine, as described in that article. As we have seen, the Russian doctrine (and Ukraine's doctrine) relies on much more brute force to push a meter at a time and much more indiscriminate damage. It's hard to imagine chemical weapons being useless.

He makes the mistake of looking at how the US military fights and thinking that is the only way to fight a war. Incidentally, if you looked at how the Roman army used short swords and concluded that "long swords are useless for fighting a war," I bet he would have something to say about it.
The problem with these devices, for the government, is that the people _might_ come back, but this time with tools designed to defeat these devices (such as guns as explosives). If that happens, it can be very bad (for both parties).

Overuse of these kinds of things is...dangerous for the government
Serbia is currently using it on its own people, and yet we here we are reading about it and discussing, with no small amount of outrage.
tried to find a solution for your 3rd point, would love to get your feedback
Listing all of the creators from whose attribution-licensed works an LLM (potentially) derived an output would seem to satisfy the letter of such licenses, but it is not clear that such would satisfy the spirit (which seems to assume a stronger causal link and a more limited number of attributions). If creators can be grouped outside of the creator naming explicitly associated with the works, this could degrade into "this work is derived from the works of humanity"; however, listing all human beings individually does not seem _meaningfully_ different and seems to satisfy the attribution requirement of such licenses.

From what little I understand of LLMs, the weight network developed by training on a large collection of inputs is similar to human knowledge in that some things will be clearly derived (at least in part) from a limited number of inputs but others might have no clear contributor density. If I wrote a human "superiority" science fiction story, I could be fairly confident that Timothy Zahn and Gordon R. Dickson "contributed"; however, this contribution would not be considered enough to violate copyright and require licensing. Some LLM outputs clearly violate copyright (e.g., near verbatim quotation of significant length), but other outputs seem to be more broadly derived.

If the law treats LLMs like humans ("fairly"), then broad derivation would not seem to violate copyright. This seems to lead toward "AI rights". I cannot imagine how concepts of just compensation and healthy/safe working conditions would apply to an AI. Can a corporation own a computer system than embodies an AI or is that slavery?

If the law makes special exceptions for LLMs, e.g., adjusting copyright such that fair use and natural learning only apply to human persons, then licensing would be required for training. However, attribution licenses seem to have the above-mentioned loophole. (That this loophole is not exploited may be laziness or concern about admitting that following the license is required — which makes less openly licensed/unlicensed works poisonous.)

If the purpose of copyright is to "promote the useful arts", then the law should reflect that purpose. Demotivating human creators and the sharing of their works seems destructive to that purpose, but LLMs are also enabling some creativity. Law should also incorporate general concepts such as equality under the law. LLMs also seem to have the potential for power concentration, which is also a concern for just laws.

Perhaps I am insufficiently educated on the tradeoffs to see an obvious solution, but this seems to me like a difficult problem.
Leadership wants more AI. And every product team at Microsoft scrambles to find applications for it
> Notion is some kind of Kanban board, isn't it?

No, it’s not. But I wouldn’t be surprised if it has a Kanban board.

It’s a proprietary cloud-based wiki with support for every more or less mainstream feature (multimedia, databases, AI integration, collaboration, etc.). It’s a bit sluggish and doesn’t have a good mobile story, but if you don’t mind the proprietary aspect, it’s otherwise a polished product.
Almost every single authoritarian thinks that way. That’s how they stay in power. Please google Volksaufstand (1953), Hungarian Uprising (1956), Prague Spring (1968), Tiananmen (1989), Vilnius Massacre (1991)…
I'm not a physicist, but that doesn't really sound right. Might I ask you a reference or an explanation?
I think when you take something from the public domain and make it proprietary, that is close enough to stealing that it's appropriate to use the word colloquially.
Just today, I finished migrating all my local services from my Windows desktop to a new machine running Ubuntu 24.10. I can now shut down the entire Windows machine and boot it up without Internet access as needed. Seems like as good a time as any to run Linux on the desktop.
Sleep patterns may reveal comatose patients with hidden consciousness
MIT explicitly gives the right to sublicense. That means you give certain rights to Alice, who gives fewer rights to Bob. Bob isn't allowed to give away copies of the software Alice gives her, because Alice, being a smart businesswoman, made sure Bob's license agreement is a proprietary one. She's not violating MIT, because she put your name and a copy of the MIT license in notices.txt, but the license doesn't actually apply to the software.
except we can guarantee (with tests) that the generated instructions from the compiler are bug free 99% of the time. Pretty big difference there.
This video literally shows you otherwise.
People play up Bill Gates’ connections, sure, but next to no 16-year-olds could program BASIC in assembly.

Microsoft’s success was as much to do with them being a programming languages company first. DOS, Windows 3.1, and even Windows 95 shipped with an interpreter and compiler for their BASIC and C, respectively. This empowered developers to use and write code for the OS out-of-the-box.
Yeah, I agree it feels janky.

They could probably use this API: https://developer.android.com/develop/connectivity/wifi/wifi... or https://developer.android.com/reference/android/provider/Set... to skip the step with Google Lens. Showing the QR-Code is still an interesting functionaliy, for the use case if they had a second phone they wanted to connect that doesn't have this app.
C is not assembly, nor is it portable assembly at all in this century, so your phrasing is very off.

C code will go through a huge amounts of transformations by the compiler, and unless you are a compiler expert you will have no idea how the resulting code looks. It's not targeting the PDP-11 anymore.
The vampire v4 is too proprietary, has too many incompatibilities and there's way too much drama around it, besides costing an arm and a leg.

For a modern FPGA setup, I'd look at miSTer. There's an excellent miniMig core for it, complete with AGA support, and it is open source hardware.
They can have my MS Word and Excel 2010 install binaries when they pry them from my cold, dead hard drive. I've been using them for 15 years and so far have no need to pay a penny more for what is essentially the same thing, only with more bloat and less control.
This is one of the reasons I believe science and technology as a whole are on an S-curve. This is obviously not a precise statement and more of a general observation, but each step on the path is a little harder than the last.

Whenever a physics theory gets replaced it becomes even harder to make an even better theory. In technology low hanging fruit continues to get picked and the next fruit is a little higher up. Of course there are lots of fruits and sometimes you miss one and a solution turns out to be easier than expected but overall every phase of technology is a little harder and more expensive.

This actually coincides with science. Technology is finding useful configurations of science, and practically speaking there are only so many useful configurations for a given level of science. So the technology S-curve is built on the science S-curve.
Suppressing protests in US isn't usually law enforcement, its purpose is to violate the law and suppress speech.
critical thinking is hard i guess
Best social network/forum for a beginner self-taught developer?
Hi, I am medical student who recently discovered programming and I am learning on my own (I can see cool uses of these skills in the medical field). The thing is I would like to find a community of tech people (some social network/forum/whatever) where I can ask questions, recommendations, advice, etc. Or just share my progress. X (Twitter) is the closest thing I know, as there is a lot of tech people there, but it doesn't seem quiet the place I am searching for.
They have since added App Intents to the LLM automation stew.
Ask HN: What are your plans when coding is obsolete?
Ive been using ClaudeCode as a veteran coder, I feel I will be out of work by the end of this year.

I am not interested in hearing from folks who think "there will always be something". Yes I know. I know we will all continue to code as hobbies and AI will be fun to us. I am talkign in regards to employment. I mean for most of us whats next? Gardening? Plumbing?

I know this might be a sad topic, but I am allowed to ask this folks
Worth looking into pimiga and amiberry, if using raspberry pi for Amiga emulation.

Of course, retroarch has an Amiga emulator as well.
Biden had the same attitudes towards enemies like Palestine and unaligned powers in the Middle East and Africa, where the main issue is inaction.

Trump is starting trade wars with close economic allies, threatening to annex territory from other NATO members, and closing down century-old institutions overnight.

There is a difference between seeing Israel killing Palestinians and doing nothing, and actually threatening overt action against what were once allies.
So braking that won’t hit children is soft locked behind a paywall? I don’t think that is a great argument for the perspective buyer.
I wouldn't trust the US as far as I can throw them. Even before the current administration.
That's the exact same circumstances that lead to the development of guerilla warfare. I don't know how you'd go around creating a "highly visible gimmick" that has any lasting impact though.
America's (lack of) separation between church and state
> The "vast majority" may never care, but the compliment is still a very sizable market.

I agree as well here, and from that complement I hope to be able to draw a small community around my product. Still, I pessimistically feel that it's too small a share of users to make browser vendors take notice and build features for them. But of course I'd love if they'd prove me wrong. :)
Egyptian Priests, AI and Creativity
GIMP definitely suffers from programmer UI design, but Photoshop isn't much better. Menus nested in menus nested in dialogue boxes, keyboard shortcuts that conflict with every other shortcut on any system still in use today, and of course the assumption that everyone already knows what every button does. It's not quite Blender levels of unintuitive, but there's a reason people take courses just to use the damn program. If it weren't for the branding popularity and the fact Photoshop was one of the first programs of its kind, I don't think it'd ever gain popularity with that terrible kludge of a UI, and that's without the ridiculous price.

Ever since GIMP docked toolbars and windows by default (which also took a few versions in Photoshop) I don't think the interface is that bad anymore, at least not compared to Photoshop.
This is known as the Second System Effect: where Great Rewrites always succeed in making a more performant thing.
older accelerators still work and are great compatibility-wise of course, there's also terrible fire which is great. I'd put Vampire the last actually, in-part due to compatibility and as you've said it.. you can pretty much do the thing with RPI and heck, you can even have rpi as an accelerator within an amiga - PiStorm.

I have three A1200s, two A600s, and an A500+. In each A1200 I have in order of least to most powerful: Blizzard 1230 with 030+FPU, Blizzard 1260 with 060, and TF1260 with 060. If I'm after most compatibility and games, it's 1230 that gets out. B1230 is just plug and play, you put it into Amiga and it's faster. That's it. With 1260 both Blizzard and TF you have to install stuff, play with it etc. It's good for demos and demo coding where target always is anyways Blizzard 1260. In A600 I have one stock and one with Furia with 030. A500+ is stock (actually A500 reworked to be A500+). Technically that's the full circle of it. There's no new stuff made for it or advantage of more power than this. Demos are made for 060 anyways. I also have PCMCIA cards with WiFi on them so that I can move stuff to amigas over the air, or even remote execute code.

Aside from ALL OF THAT (including a bunch of 1084s monitors), I have RPI 400 on which I have installed an emulator. It gets most use out of all of the above. I boot it up, it's an amiga, has all the crap on it and most of it works immediately. What's also cool is it's a computer in a keyboard with a mouse, just like amiga was. That's what I'd recommend anyone wanting to get a bit into it outside of WinUAE on their own comp.
so you saying if there are violence or sabotage, you let these people do it??? how can that be better
In practice they only lock out "good" bots. "Bad" bots have their residential proxy botnets and run real browsers in virtual machines, so there's not much of a signature.

This often suits businesses just fine, since "good" bots are often the ones they want to block. A bot that would transcribe comments from your website to RSS, for example, reduces the ad revenue on your website, so it's bad. But the spammer is posting more comments and they look like legit page views, so you get more ad revenue.
What's a trans colleague?
Polestar 3 is the only car with lidar in the US that I know of.
Anecdotally, this isn’t surprising. I’ve always enjoyed nature documentaries, and since getting a large TV and decent sound system, I really enjoy them. They’re very calming to watch as a winding-down activity at night.
It's still a good idea to look at an Erlang book like this one. Kind of like natural languages, it's handy to be able to read Erlang even if you don't or can't write it. There's a lot of older literature, Erlang, pre-Elixir, that is worthy of study.
Notion is good, maybe great for some but small things holding it back from becoming ubiquitous.

Does notion work offline-first yet?

The only copy of my data should not exist solely in an app’s cloud, and I should not need to manually export anything.

Collaboration is nice, still has nothing to do with being offline-first.

Docs looks very promising. Congrats to the remnant he launch.

Another effort that might be a subset of Docs is Anytype - another French effort that seems to be very promising.
I know it's usually poor form to whine about the names for things, but "cua" and "computer" have such a massive history, at least with Lume it was a more distinct thing to search for

---

In the spirit of being constructive, don't overlook the previous submission's comment which I felt addressed some common questions one might have https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42990867
> As explained in the military manual of the Netherlands, the prohibition of the use of riot control agents as a method of warfare is inspired by the fact that use of tear gas, for example, in armed conflict “runs the danger of provoking the use of other more dangerous chemicals”. A party which is being attacked by riot control agents may think it is being attacked by deadly chemical weapons and resort to the use of chemical weapons. It is this danger of escalation that States sought to avert by agreeing to prohibit the use of riot control agents as a method of warfare in armed conflict. This motivation is equally valid in international and non-international armed conflicts.

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/rule75
I've never been able to Google myself ... What did most of you find?
Do you have a reference for that last paragraph?
A fair few will also just reset all css to avoid having to deal with different browsers opinionated stylings.
Show HN: Newsletter/Email Summarizer
Hey HN,

As an avid newsletter subscriber(er?), I found myself quickly getting annoyed at the tens of emails that would flood my inbox every morning. I knew there was helpful information in there, but I wasn't quite sure of the what or where, and finding that would eat quite the chunk out of my mornings.

to fix this, I unsubscribed from everything with my personal email, made a new email address, and wrote a little script that turned the tens of emails into a single one that told me what was covered in each newsletter, and what it meant for me from my perspective.

I passed this script to a few friends, and long story short I "vibe-coded" an app out of it. DeepLetter gives you three things:

first, an inbox generator, giving you an email address you can use to subscribe to any and all email-based services.

second, a perspective, where you can describe your career/hobby that you want the script to look at all the emails from.

Finally, a newsletter, where you can incorporate the two and set a send cadence for how frequently you want to receive these summaries.

Would love it if the folks here can check it out and let me know what you think! this isn't a VC-backed whatever where I'm trying to 10x this or 100x that, just trying to reach people this may be helpful to :)
I was only starting working with computers as an unpaid IT help at that time, but I distinctly remember that MS Office was just better. More streamlined, and well-integrated.

Back then, pretty much everybody in my country just pirated the software, so the cost was not a consideration at all.