skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That framing of the issue makes a lot of sense. It might still be a reasonable middle ground if Google doesn't own Chrome itself, or control the proprietary bits or any related backend services, but still maintains leadership of Chromium development.

As a Firefox user, I also don't love the implications of forcing Google to end its default search engine deal with Firefox. If they changed course on that, then a similar deal with the hypothetical non-Google Chrome could be a viable way to maintain something like Chrome's current financial model without giving Google too much control over the web.

On the other hand, one might argue that Google's search business and that sector as a whole are already at a high enough risk right now without the courts throwing another wildcard into the mix. I'm not staking out a position on this one way or another, but I hope whatever decisions they land on are very carefully considered.
Normally, yes. But there's a couple rendering modes with these frameworks. In this case, the rendering is most likely 'hybrid'. Some routes are statically pre-rendered, some are served via SSR. You'd need a JS server for the SSR ofc.
I wonder if you think about (things like) Hazelcast?

It is JVM based "shared cache" so can be used to transparently share results of expensive queries - but also to share sessions. It mostly just works but the free version have some issues when one upgrade data models.

I know half the people here probably loathe JVM but once one is aware of one implementation I guess it should be possible to find similar things for .Net and maybe also go and Python.
Those magazines from the 70s and 80s look so good!
My comment was less about rules lawyering, and more about the meaning - I would think?

The Council of Nicea - for one example - definitely did NOT make all the alternatives more popular/less dead, right?

Sometimes the streisand effect is real and permanent, sometimes it’s just temporary and the bans/stamping out/destruction work. And unless we’re buried under a mountain of ‘all the others’ which I don’t see, there is a whole lot of it which just goes away through the passage of time because of those effects. Which looks to me like 100x’ish, due to the ‘reverse pyramid’ effect of history.

Or are you making another point i’m missing?
Casting pointers to ints is generally safe (at least as long as you use intptr_t instead of assuming that the size of pointers will never change).

The issue comes when you try casting to pointers. Because of providence, aliasing rules, and a couple of dragons that built a nest in the C language specification, you could have two pointers to the exact same memory locations, but have the program be undefined if you use the wrong pointer.

Granted, this doesn't stop you from doing things like

foo_t *foo = (foo_t*) 0xDEADBEEF

And in the few occasions where that is something you would reasonably want to do it does more or less what you would expect (unless you forgot that the CPU sticks a transparent cache between you and the memory bus; but not even assembly would save you from that oversight).
> and they indicated that it's only a problem for "standalone" deployments (i.e. not on Vercel)

The fix is clearly to take out your wallet /not.

NextJs is slow. It doesn't have to be. For their swc, turborepo and everything else going on they could have made the actual production usage fast just as well.
Let's say I don't agree (and indeed I don't) - why?

My argument would be that 'tools' should be designed solely with the purpose of enabling them to work in the most effective way possible. That is often not immediately intuitive at all. Go open up e.g. Unreal Engine and you're going to struggle to do literally anything. Maybe after an hour you might figure out how to put a square on the map. The same is true of something like Maya or any other really powerful tool.

Obviously things should not be unnecessarily hostile, but it often simply turns out that there are 'revolutionary' ways to do things that weren't really done in the past, and so somebody coming from that past will often find themselves out of their domain, at least for a few moments until they learn and/or have things explained.
Unfortunately, it doesn't really work like that. If you say "Don't recommend channel", the channel may in fact be recommended and similar channels will definitely still be recommended. "Not interested" works even less accurately.
It's the difference between (await (await foo).bar).baz and foo.await.bar.await.baz -- which do you want to write?
That doesn’t invalidate the idea, because we’d see it happening in countries like the US, but we don’t.
On a "pure" LLM, yes.

But it is possible that LLM providers circumvent this. For example, it might be the case that claude when set to concise mode, doesn't apply that to the thinking tokens, and only applies it to the summary. Or, the provider could be augmenting your prompt. From my simple tests on chatgpt, it seems that this is not the case, and asking it to be terse cuts the CoT tokens short as well. Someone needs to test on Claude 3.7 with the reasoning settings.
He talks about this mean-reversion effect.
I'm not the same person as above, but I feel the same sentiment. There's no hard data, but the pattern of behavior is far too consistent for me to write it off. Plenty of political articles that make it through, but specifically the ones that paint the current US admin as being wrong (even implicitly, by covering their more extreme actions) seem to often accrue a lot of points, shoot up to the front page, and then get flagged - while lots of other political stuff passes through.

It also just lines up with what I observed in HN users before that - the average user seems to be far more likely to be a richer, older, American conservative than any random user on the English internet or even other tech spaces.
The apparent problem in von Braun's prophecy

> The Martian government was directed by 10 men, the leader of whom was elected by universal suffrage for five years and had the title of “Elon.”

is that nobody would elect Elon to Elon in secret and fair voting. He would just take this title and then you have political turmoil for the rest of this episode.

So even if it would be technically possible, nobody would join him.
Great question and one that I hope people would put more thought into. Here are two possible reasons off the top of my head:

- pushing for web ecosystem features that would help their own products (ex: Gmail, docs, etc)

- pushing for web enhancements that back SEO metrics that matter to them (ex: core web vitals)

I don’t think it’s as simple as - no more Chrome == no more investment into Chromium because Chrome/Chromium has been their strongest lever for getting web features that Google wants standardized. Stopping investment in that area cedes control of the web to other players who may have opposing goals to Google.
What format do you submit your resume in? In a doc or PDF you should theoretically be able to load an externally accessible beacon. Depending on how the person is viewing it, you could get some interesting results, including if an LLM looks at it first.
While reading, I was wondering about matcha, and then I saw your comment -- which jives with my personal experience too! Thanks for chiming in :)
These result counts are known to be fake.
Ditch next, build a static site, put it in your object storage of choice, cache/cdn in front… solved problem?
Well if you accept collectively shift all times by an hour, you're effectively arguing for the system we have.
Not to put too fine a point on it but if there are blind trials showing no effect and non-blind trials showing an effect, my conclusion would be the effect is a placebo.
How does the model retrieve documentation? Through an MCP server?
> Well, nobody will be able to reproduce their work (unless other people also publish fraudulent work from there)

In theory, yes, in practice, the original result for amyloid beta protein as the main cause of Alzheimer were faked and it wasn't caught for 16 years. A member of my family took med based on it and died in the meantime.
I 100% agree that grafting a chatbox on an existing app that wasn't meant for it sucks. (I'm working on an AI app where I set a "no chatbox" constraint, see my profile.)

However, I think a lot of people are willing to type if it will do something useful they can't otherwise accomplish. And: typing gives you user intent, very valuable.
Basic rookie mistake: Displaying images in 16:10, not 4:3 which would be the size they would appear as on an actual Commodore 64 connected to a TV or monitor.
I always had cramps no matter how much magnesium I took. It wasn't until I went low carb that cramps dissapeared, even without taking magnesium.
It's so wild to me that we ever thought it was a good idea to change the clock, rather than just changing when things are scheduled based on local constraints like where the sun is in the sky.

Let's get rid of timezones altogether.
You obviously have never used a PowerPC based Mac... Or else you would know that the inter macs were a massive leap forward.
We, the people who used to write code, laboriously, by hand, using one's and zero's passed down to us, from Jacquard's loom, from before there was an Internet, do. A dying art, I suppose. Look at carpentry. The level of care put into the average kitchen cabinet evaporated when mass manufacturing means that Ikea can sell a set that is functional and looks just fine. Used to be, a carpenter painstakingly did it by hand, piece by piece in a woodshop. So too goes the way of coding, I suppose. Used to be every "if" "for" and "class" statement was typed out by a human, seen by human eyes. It seems that time must pass.
(n-s: the source of my attempted analog :

https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~aldrich/courses/15-819O-13sp/resourc...

A concise few pages worth drowning in! (For me))

(p-s: 2 "repulsive fixed-points" of 2 messianics of interest:

PG: the anti-prig

Thiel: the protocolizer as chief optimist/protocolization creditor/secretary of the politburo
)

(p-p-s, from the comments: Henry VIII as designer of new kinds of windmills, would have been awesome snack if that checks out, roughly on par with Lawrence of A coming up with a new jet engine)
This immediately brought this xkcd comic to mind:

https://xkcd.com/1387/
It was an explanation of the title, not the video. The video is about Jeff Geerling explaining that he is now diversifying his video output to Floatplane due to YouTube AI slop, removing dislikes, censorship policy, and user hostile behaviour. And he explains why it is Floatplane and not Nebula or others.
> One key thing to underline: each request in the test is just a single call to the pre-rendered Next.js page. No assets are requested. A real visitor would need 60+ additional requests. That means as few as three simultaneous visitors could push the server dangerously close to its limit.

Ok but remember browsers will reuse HTTP connections, HTTP2 introduces multiplexing, and browsers have tight mode. So you can't just take the figures for 1 request and divide by 60 to get the real world performance.
+1 for Mazda. And also for keeping an actual shifter instead of knobs or buttons.
"Thud" The women coppers go out for a drink. Fred and Nobbs observe and make comment. Pratchett knew he wanted the pun(e) and I think worked out how to get it into dialogue
That is definitely not what I asked.
I really thought this name was from the common word for "human" in many languages across India. Slightly different pronunciations in some languages but I think many Indians would relate to the word as a derivative of "human".
Disagree on this one. In an interview there is no "the answer", it's a dialogue. I've interviewed a lot of people, often using performance related questions, and trust me, there are lots of candidates whose only answer to those is "add a cache", even after multiple follow-up questions or hints like "is there anything else that can be done?", "try thinking outside the box", "what can be done with the database itself", etc. Only a novice interviewer will be fooled by the first answer. If you cannot demonstrate more solutions after that, it shows that you clearly have no experience or problem-solving ability, which is the whole point of the interview to find out, not whether you have studied through a set of common questions.

btw, "scale up" is the second most common answer from those who can't provide better solutions. :)
It’s almost as if this post is attempting to gaslight the world into thinking that L-Theanine doesn’t work. It’s the exact equivalent of saying “Look at the data, LSD does not make you hallucinate, it’s just conjecture. Look at my data and numbers.”

This entire post makes me think there is either an ulterior motive for writing it to try and discredit the obvious impact L-Theanine has on people, or, the write up is simply an irresponsible take on trying to show that one used data to prove something as false which is unequivocally true, at least for some.

Nonetheless, L-Theanine profoundly impacts some people and others it has no effect on. This post should have language that makes it clear that the results are from one single person who has one single experience which is extremely divergent relative to others who have experienced the life changing effects of L-Theanine.

Without such qualifying language this post seems grossly irresponsible and misleads the reader into thinking there is no effect that L-Theanine has.

That’s my interpretation, at least!
so pick 30 minutes as the permanent offset
unfortunately it is indistinguishable from what a reasonable human high on mcp copium might write
The_Secret_Ingredient_Is_Crime.gif
This hits at the true nature of the problem which has _nothing_ to do with Redis at all (which is a fine piece of technology written by a thoughtful and conscientious creator) and has everything to do with the fact that our industry at large encourages very little thinking about the problems we are trying to solve.

Hence, fads dominate. I hate to sound so cynical but that has been my experience in every instance of commercial software development.
Reusing HTTP connections is not relevant if the app is behind a reverse proxy like nginx, which, last time I checked, still didn’t proxy with http2 multiplexing connections to the app server.
SpacetimeDB 1.0 – a database for multiplayer back ends [video]
It's projection. He launches the mob when it suits him and assumes people opposed to his world view do the same back. If he flings enough dung, some will stick and to a willing mind, Soros is the useful enemy: he's rich and he's Jewish. Many many rightist conspiracy views put him center frame in times past.
GRBs happen relatively frequently. GRBs that end up orientated directly towards Earth do not.
why use pam when ssh has authentication built in? pam is great if you have a reason to use it. I use it on my Mac so I can use my fingerprint for sudo. turning on pam implies you want to do something with it.
They not only officially own the user-agent which they made sure is the most installed.

They are gray cardinals of web standards which they bloated to the point of zero viable competition. And their only opponent lives on their couch.
Many (most?) C developers are also non-C developers.
This has been my experience with it as well. It appears to regulate the spike of caffeine from coffee. I recall reading it had to do with an enzyme that helped the body process caffeine so it attentuates the effect of the stimulant. Whether that's true, I often take one with coffee. I've also experienced similar effects chasing my morning coffee with green tea.
I have a FirstName@firstlastname.com, have for about ten years.

I run my own server on a VPS with the Axigen server stack.

The first couple of years were tough to get it all configured right, but I haven't had any deliverability issues in a very long time. Yes, even Google and Microsoft talk to me.

It is indeed very possible to run your own service in 2025. I wouldn't recommend it for the casual tinkerer though, this is more of a lifetime commitment.

Just like the lifetime commitment I made when I let my then-boyfriend have an account. I'll be administering email for my ex for the rest of time.
> problem is that honest politicians are uncommon

I don't think that's true at all.
My impression is that there are honest and honorable politicians in both parties. But the crazy Machiavellians rise to the top, I don't know why.
> Firefox and Safari Exempted

It's been long enough now that there are significant differences, but Chrome started from the same base as Safari. The teams had different perspectives, so Chrome forked Safari's internals and called the result Blink.
sequel to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43130155
Yes! This so much! In my circles, I have seen a tendency to perceive fiction as a kind of low-brow, less intellectual reading. But then these people go on and pick up self-help non-fiction books.

Fiction has so much more to offer! On top of what you wrote, fiction helps you to develop an ability to put yourself in others' shoes. Empathy is anyway scarce in this politically-charged and ragebait-filled world.

Fiction has helped me develop empathy and to stay empathetic. It has helped me develop my philosophy of life; morals and values I strive to stay close to. The fictional characters have given me courage during hard times. And so much more.

Lot of people prefer to start with self-help kind of non-fiction which is, IMO, the least helpful category of books. I don't know what draw people to it.
It turns on recirculation since you want it cold. There is only so much cooling the airco pump can do and pushing in hot outside air does not cool it further. If you want it cold it needs to get cooler air to do so and that is the air previously cooled. What you want is a bigger heat exchanger and pump. Invest in that if you want cooler air.
Glances down at my Framework 13 keyboard. They copied Apple and did the same (bad) thing.
The title says "my experiment", it couldn't be any clearer and open it's about a single person's experience.
After AI, the next boom will be robotics.
Do us a favor and don't misrepresent what I say. "Self-published author" connotes no-name author (or anonymous/pseudonymous) with no publishing history or reputation; whereas Neil Gaiman is already reputable and has sold 40+ million books.

Statistically, the average e-book that Amazon tries to advertise to you is far more likely to be the former than the letter. And that was before the current wave of "pay to learn our system to get rich publishing e-books".
I even have friends who tried it for a while. They hardly made any money.
Before Edge, everyone had to install Chrome because the web wouldn't work with IE. It is still the case that some major sites don't work with Firefox either. Edge is as close to a de-Googled Chrome as you can get to work properly. Unfortunately de-Googling meant re-Microsofting
I think this viewpoint is too simplistic in that the assumption is that if Google has to divest Chrome, then there is no benefit to investing in Chromium. I think that is too black and white (see my other comment on why - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43306985).

Let’s do a thought experiment - If Google truly felt that Chromium has no benefit, then smaller players will drive the project and, as others have pointed out, new feature proposals/implementations will slow down. That isn’t a bad thing in my opinion because it allows other engines to not be stuck in catchup mode. The field will start to even out and innovations will start to come from alternative engines. With an even playing field, what was once an unprofitable endeavor can become a differentiator in the browser ecosystem.
I know this is nitpicking and perhaps a dumb thing to say, but in my view the simple case of drink spilling does not apply.

Have you been around children who spill a drink? The ones who experience high levels of stress bury their heads and treat it as a catastrophe, waiting for someone else to clean it up and soothe them.

Those who treat it as no big deal are more likely to clean it up.

And being more careful only grows slowly with age. Oh, and using heavier glasses btw. It's way better to give kids real glass for drinks and tolerate the occasional breakage than to have constant spilling with light plastic cups.
A Unix kernel will kill your process just because it wrote into a broken pipe.
Behavior of half open TCP connections (SYN flood)
I think we have killed science fiction with all sort of dumb things, but specially social media. And I don't mean that people spend more time on social media than reading (but they definitely do), but that in social media everybody is a bad critic, and that influences authors.

Just to give an example, I put off for many years reading Larry Niven's ringworld series, because I read in Twitter that the book was sexist. Well, it was sexist, but so were things at the time, and Ringworld is an amazing book otherwise, with some actual science sprinkled here and there, a lot of humor, and it's relatively low on drama.

Another science fiction killer was Hollywood. They want so much drama and special effects,and it should be appealing to people who don't know any science at all.

Who knows, maybe AI slop will save us by making us value logical consistency in art, something that current transformers and LLMs are very bad at. But I have more faith on our top-of-the-line AIs becoming logically consistent way before popular culture shifts in that direction, since current economic forces press for smarter AIs and stupider people.
Google's share of my attention is negligible to the point of barely existing when compared to HN, X, YouTube(yes I know, but I see no adds because I have premium), podcasts, audiobooks and many other things. Even Facebook probably takes more attention and I barely use it.
The great Metroid secret world hunt (1998)
'International Times' Archive (1966…)
That’s fair, however the overall gist of the post seems to imply that the numbers data and numbers produced somehow groundbreakingly prove that everyone who has proclaimed it works is wrong and the data and numbers in the post prove that.

Happy to be told I’m wrong, but that’s how I read it.
The spec and server docs also contain a helpful explanation:

https://spec.modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2024-11-0...

https://modelcontextprotocol.io/sdk/java/mcp-server

Also, btw, how long until people rediscover HATEOAS, something which inherently relies on a generalised artificial intelligence to be useful in the first place?
Are VR headsets better for the eyes than a screen?
I've never seen this. Usually you don't have the LaTeX source of a paper you cite, you wouldn't know which label to use for the reference, when the cited paper is written in LaTeX at all. Or something changed quite a bit in recent years.

Can you link to another paper's Figure 2.2 now, and have LaTeX error out if the link is broken? How does that work?
That's not blinded though right, you'd know if you were taking Vit D or not and that would corrupt the experiment
The moment I saw the title I knew it has something to do with EVE. Those people were revolutionary and it is a shame EVE never made it, what a glorious masterpiece of an article.
Cutting-edge web scraping techniques from nicar 2025
Appreciate the response. I took the turmeric combo a couple of times and had to stop due to stomach irritation from the pepper.
Can’t edit my comment.

Were any of the downvotes and responses related to the Theanine with relora pill for stress relief?
Another SF&F magazine I enjoy is Clarkesworld. I met the editor at Worldcon last year and it was nice hearing about how they manage to publish online for free and still pay authors.

https://clarkesworldmagazine.com/
> The problem is that it doesn't make business sense for anybody else to buy Chrome

I don't see why divesting it necessarily means selling it to another company. Google could create a non-profit like Mozilla, or a for profit and float it as its own business.