skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think that is basically the case indirectly.

Here an example with my limited understanding:

Chinese steel is super expensive in the US now, so US manufacturers buy less of it raising the cost of US products.

This makes Chinese steel more available on the world market and it becomes cheaper for everyone else.

Due to the increased cost of steel US stuff made out of said steel, is generally more expensive while everyone else's become cheaper.

So products not made in the US become cheaper in comparison and thus sell better for more profit.

Oddly enough the EU imposed counter Tariffs on some weird stuff like Alcohol and Motorcycles...

Europeans can easily replace Jim Beam in their Cola.

And Harley Davidson is insanely expensive anyway with the usual customers being by MC-Members or dentist in their midlife crisis.
A Chinese factory sparked a political meltdown in a small Michigan town
Here is an example then, assuming you mean this kind of abstrations,

#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

template <typename T>
concept Speaker = requires (T t) {
t.speak();
};

class Duck {
public:
void speak() const {
cout << "quack";
}
};

class Dog {
public:
void speak() const {
cout << "auau";
}
};

class Cat {
public:
void speak() const {
cout << "miau";
}
};

template<Speaker T>
void speaking_animal(const T& animal) {
animal.speak();
cout << "\n\n";
}

template<Speaker... T>
void speaking_farm(const T&... animals) {
auto space_adder = [&](auto creature) -> void {
creature.speak();
cout << " ";
};
(space_adder(animals), ...);
}

int main() {
Duck duck;
Dog dog;
Cat cat;

speaking_animal(duck);

speaking_animal(dog);

speaking_animal(cat);

speaking_farm(duck, dog, cat);

}

Live example, https://godbolt.org/z/vPhf13xEh
Interesting tangent to bring up. How many people does America kill?
Absense of "soft" skills and weird logical process of course
Can you explain how? Or is your argument "One guy in a basement in Bulgaria could build Firefox for 50 Stotinki."?
Ask HN: Are anyone else's HN points mysteriously increasing out of no where?
Despite not posting in several days, and none of my recent comments changing points, my points are mysteriously increasing at a steady rate

Worried bots have figured out how to game the system etc
Uncertainty has a cost. The stupid daily changing trade war with Canada is causing a lot of Canadian companies to make medium or long term decisions to decouple from the US.
Well, yeah. They need to do that, too!
> Now if they will have problems, they will depend on the Go team at Google to fix them.

Or collaborate with Go team.
tldr; it was easier to convert the existing codebase with all its quirks from Typescript to Go than to Rust or C#.
Perplexity charges $5 per 1k searches for their Sonar API - this is pretty ridiculous.
I like the smaller models because they are faster. I even got a Llama 3 1B model running on TinkerBoard 2S and it was fun to play around with and not too slow. The smaller models are still good at summarizing and other basic tasks. For coding they start showing their limits but still work great for trying to figure out issues in small bits of code.

The real issue with local models is managing context. smaller models let you have a longer context without losing performance but bigger models are smarter but if you want to keep it fast I have to reduce the context length.

Also all of the models have their own "personalities" and they still manifest in the finetunes.
I have been adding .env files to .cursorignore so far.

I can see from that thread that the approach hasn’t been perfect, but it seems that the last two releases have tried to address that :

“0.46.x : .cursorignore now blocks files from being added in chat or sent up for tab completions, in addition to ignoring them from indexing.”
Even if you're right (I don't know or care) I don't know what your point is. That Mozilla should form a commercial agreement with Google instead of DuckDuckGo? Is the latter even an option?
"I don't understand it, must be <insert conspiracy>."
Man these were some well educated mr Bean level hijinks.

I had to stifle a laugh multiple times reading it.

One of the highlights was definitely:

“I tried kits for making custom-molded earplugs. One hardly blocked any noise. Another had a small piece immediately break off deep inside my ear, resulting in legendary good times trying to remove it with a screw”

like, why a screw? not tweezers, not anything of that sort?

also the part about trying to have a conversation with the earmuffs on, lol.

I feel for you OOP but still, pretty funny.
> Oddly enough the EU imposed counter Tariffs on some weird stuff like Alcohol and Motorcycles...

Red state tariffs.

NB the US tariffs apply to EU steel and steel products, not just Chinese ones, which is why this whole thing is happening.
Won't somebody think of children‽
I find that my understanding of different layers is usually not needed but is rarely important toy ability to solve thorny issues or figure out ways to do things or debug issues that others are not even trying.

I'm working in areas of systems programming where such knowledge and willingness to go deeper into the stack is helpful, even if rarely so.

I can't say I understand the kernel, I only scratch the surface of most of it and only dug deeper where I really needed to and only as deep as time allowed me and the need required though.
I found confort in Java and .NET ecosystems, it is not the whole package, but the closest we as industry apparently managed to get closer to Xerox PARC ideas.
It's a real pity they got discontinued. The sleepbuds work fantastic and are the only product that works for me.
> Now is the time for Mozilla to take bold steps to reinforce its identity as a privacy-centric nonprofit

Mozilla gave up that identity when it became an ad-tech company whose business model was to sell reports about the internet browsing habits of firefox users to advertisers.

The problem was never Mozilla's dependence Google. The problem is their dependence on the surveillance of internet users.

As far as I know Mozilla hasn't disclosed how much money they spent buying up Anonym, but they'll want a return on their investment. I don't think they're going to abandon it as quickly as they did their ideals.
This reads like a cautionary tale about getting nerdsniped, without a happy ending.
Company doesnt have to do it successfully or even stay afloat to impact you. Your employer doesn't have to do anything at all for you to be impacted, as long as their competitors do -- your wages still be supressed.

> - but then I suppose what's the problem exactly?, ha.

the problem is, companies want to or required to discriminate based on origin and residency status, but ai nerfs their ability to do so (cheaply at least)
> they keep detailed records of your performance in school from kindergarten and a comprehensive dossier

this also means you want your record pristine. And it is also why officials cover up problems rather than report it up.

But their current success to out-maneuver the US in terms of trade, as well as capacity, is testament to perhaps the success of such a system. I do recall there was a massive purge on corruption over the past decade(s), which is probably helped a lot. This did not happen in soviet russia.
Rust is not free of trade offs and you're not helping the cause the way you think you are.

Just a few off the top:

- Rust is a much more complex language than C

- Rust has a much, much slower compiler than pretty much any language out there

- Rust takes most people far longer to "feel" productive

- Rust applications are sometimes (often?) slower than comparable C applications

- Rust applications are sometimes (often?) larger than comparable C applications

You may not value these things, or you may value other things more.

That's completely fine, but please don't pretend as if Rust makes zero trade offs in exchange for the safety that people seem to value so much.
The English vegetable picked by candlelight (2019)
UK must pay cyber pros more than its Prime Minister, top civil servant says
A solution can be the same one used for proctored exams to obtain some certifications?

You have to come to a certified center next to your home, where they'll check your credentials and put you in front of a certified computer with cameras recording everything.

Since they're local, they know the customs, they know which credentials to check, and they can't place an AI in front of a computer.
There's much more to defensive programming than avoiding double frees and overflows.
Time passing and upvoting by you adds to score slowly. So rate of change might be interesting, if it is non linear perhaps you could snapshot your comments posts and upvotes and see if your bot theory is visible as very old posts and comments being acted on somehow.

I just upvoted this post and your score was 819 beforehand.
M4 MacBook Air review: Am I blue?
Bluey has the advantages of being dogs - Bandit and Bluey are identical except in size.

They’re also short episodes so they don’t feel too involved.
"11 tok/SEC running 671B DeepSeek R1 on two M3 Ultra" – Alex Cheema
This argument has always struck me as silly to conspiracy theory. The EU has its own reserve currency!
Variety is good. I got so used to working in pure C and older C++ that for a personal project I just started writing in C, until I realised that I don't have to consider other people and compatibility, so I had a lot of fun trying new things.
By denying all other avenues of learning, the USA has chosen to revert to the oldest, which can't be disabled: natural selection.
And is the effort to deport as many Mexican skilled tradesmen and manual laborers as possible the part of this grand plan?
Mozilla is much larger than the browser.
As a Russian, I share your enthusiasm in not supporting our regime. Could you share some more details about DuckDuckGo? IIRC they’ve ended their partnership with Yandex already.

Of course, there’s also search engines other than Google and DuckDuckGo, so we have options.
I heard of this described as the minority effect, that a small minority can have a disproportionate impact. The example given is that it's cheaper to make all instances of a product kosher or halal than to make an entirely separate product.
Me, too. It took you a little while to make that jump. How do you explain it?
This is easy to read, but in reality I have found things to typically be a bit less straightforward.

Three things typically happens:

1. people who like these chains really like them. And I've seen multiple "one liner expressions" that was composed of several statements anded or ored together needing one or two line breaks.

2. when it breaks (and it does in the real world), debugging is a mess. At least last time I had to deal with it was no good way to put breakpoints in there. Maybe things have changed recently, but typically one had to rewrite it to classic programming and then debug it.

3. It trips up a lot of otherwise good programmers who hasn't seen it before.
I also misread the comment at first, they're referring to the dealer taking liability, rather than Toyota or Comma.
Somebody wants that trade war and started it.
See, the thing is, I never wanted to comment on the cost or feasibility of the hardware at all. What I was commenting was that any backup plan is expected to be subpar by very nature, and if not, shouldnbe instantly promoted. If you'll notice that was 100% of what I said. I was adding to the pile of "this plan is stupid". Cursor has an actual value proposition.

Of course then you disrespected me with a rude ad hominem and got a rude response back. Ignoring the point and attacking the persin is a concession. M

For the record, I and many others use throwaways wvery single thread. This isn't and shouldn't be reddit.
Well it is technically possible to spend 10 years in a bubble, either academia or professional one, and not learn local language. If your colleagues speak all english, you have non-native partner and don't have motivation to learn it won't come on its own. Not great approach but perfectly realistic.

Don't judge easiness of learning language based on English - its one of the easiest out there to learn (I speak 5 languages and english is absolutely trivial compared to others), especially for folks with similar base (ie roman/germanic ones). Slavic languages are much harder to learn and basically useless outside given country (with few exceptions but usable mostly for C2 or natives level).

Also, compared to many other languages even very basic level of english gets you somewhere, in some languages like French natives basically refuse to speak to you or simply don't understand you unless you have cca B2 level (this is personal experience of me and folks around me where I live)
It depends on what you need the code for. If it’s something mission critical, then using AI is likely going to take more time than it saves, but for a MVP or something where quality is less important than time to market, it’s a great time saver.

Also there’s often a spectrum of importance even within a project, eg maybe some internal tools aren’t so important vs a user facing thing. Complexity also varies: AI is pretty good at simple CRUD endpoints, and it’s a lot faster than me at writing HTML/CSS UI’s (ie the layout and styling, without the logic).

If you can isolate the AI code to code that doesn’t need to be high quality, and write the code that doesn’t yourself, it can be a big win. Or if you use AI for an MVP that will be incrementally replaced by higher quality code if the MVP succeeds, can be quite valuable since it allows you to test ideas quicker.

I personally find it to be a big win, even though I also spend a lot of time fighting the AI. But I wouldn’t want to build on top of AI code without cleaning it up myself.

There are also some tasks I’ve learned to just do myself: eg I do not let the AI decide my data model/database schema. Data is too important to leave it up to an AI to decide. Also outside of simple CRUD operations, it generates quite inefficient database querying so if it’s on a critical path, perhaps write the queries yourself.
> Instead, it'll run function calls to open those files and read bits and pieces of the code until the model feels it has enough information. This seems like a perfectly reasonable strategy until you realize you cannot do the same thing with reasoning models, if you're limiting the reasoning to just the initial prompt.

There's nothing about this that conflicts with reasoning models, I'm not sure what you mean here.
That really depends what you want to do. All that security in Rust is only needed if there is a danger of hacks compromising the system.

The moment you start building something that's not exposed to the internet and hacking it has no implications, C beats it due to simplicity and speed of development .
>censored and uncensored

Well here you still have the same problem, since they're not gonna release an actually uncensored version, that tells you how to do awful things (or indeed, that tells you to do them).

So then you'd have censored and less censored, and it would still be a matter of where to draw those lines.
It says in the article that some of these companies contribute their test suite
I found deepseek better for trivial tasks
Not all sexually explicit content is harmful in all contexts for sure, but in many contexts it is fairly universally considered harmful (eg content involving minors). Do you have means of distinguishing between the two? Are you suggesting that a company must invests millions into teaching the model where exactly the red line lines so that it can have a conversation close to it but without crossing it? Or you suggest biting the bullet and releasing the model not only capable of generating eg child porn, but also having a >0 chance of randomly discussing it in unrelated contexts? Chance of error is always there, and companies decided that a risk of really bad behavior in benign context overweights the gains. Imho, a decision to not play whack a mole with this land mine is quite rational, esp considering gains vs risks vs costs. Think of it as a cost cutting measure, not as an infringement on free speech. You are free to invest you own money into this problem if you think that's a grave mistake and a missed opportunity. The first project to push the automated generated content moderation against what is considered appropriate in the given context far enough to make it economical for companies to put their guard down could actually be worth a lot if you think there's market for it (eg agents on dating websites? idk, you tell me)
Thank you for the report! We are working with the Ollama team directly and will look into it.
Try;

- EXAONE-3.5-2.4B-Instruct
- Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct-uncensored
- qwq-lcot-3b-instruct
- qwen2.5-3b-instruct

These have been very interesting tiny models, they can do text processing task and can handle story telling. The Llama-3.2 is way to sensitive to random stuff so get the uncensored or abliterated versions
> Our military is absolutely failing to live up to their oath to defend us against enemies foreign and domestic.

You guys voted to have the republican being the majority in both the house and the senate, get the presidency and also, indirectly, the supreme court.
That is democracy in action. If the military intervened right now it would just look like a coup. You can't really be surprised that the people you put in power do what they say they were going to do.

Now if they try to do something like the January 6 again, that is something else.
Thank you so much! Just don’t leave it running for too long – it’s not the most optimized piece of code I’ve ever written :-)
The author admits to having zero experience with carrier-level infrastructure, but their suspicions are essentially correct.
I actually have done a fair bit of 4G and 5G specific pentesting and security research for a number of major carriers. While it varies between carriers and between product vendors, it's still an absolute horror show. Until very recently, the security was entirely achieved through obscurity. The 4G and 5G standards have started to address this, but there are still gaps big enough to be deeply concerning. I don't think it's overly hyperbolic to assume that any moderately sophisticated threat actor who wants a beachhead on a carrier can achieve it. I've demonstrated this multiple times, professionally.
IMHO the hardware vendors from a certain East Asian state have such poorly written software stacks, that they could almost be classified as APTs - security is non-existent. There are valid reasons Western countries have banned them. Western hardware vendors have significantly more mature software, but are still many years behind what most of us would consider modern security best practices.
I can relate, but I got pretty excited for macOS 15 because of iPhone mirroring and notifications which has been a huge boon.
The Gemma 2 Instruct models are quite good (9 & 27B) for writing. The 27B is good at following instructions. I also like DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.

The Gemma 3 Instruct 4B model that was released today matches the output of the larger models for some of the stuff I am trying.

Recently, I compared 13 different online and local LLMs in a test where they tried to recreate Saki's "The Open Window" from a prompt.[1] Claude wins hands down IMO, but the other models are not bad.

[1] Variations on a Theme of Saki (https://gist.github.com/s-i-e-v-e/b4d696bfb08488aeb893cce3a4...)
> governments

Why the plural? This is something that was very much US made and other countries have no choice but to react. This is not something caused by multiple "upper echelons of governments".

This is something caused by exactly one government - US one. What did you expect, other countries to instantly give up their economy and soverenity the moment Trump said "I hate you and seek to harm you economically"? Especially since he added multiple times "and I want to annex you, take away pieces of your territory" and then added completely baseless accusations as a reason for it?
There are still enough features that IDEs like the JetBrains and Visual Studio, fail to provide versus the experiences provided across all Xerox PARC environments.

Graphical based REPLs with auto correction, able to interact with the whole development environment (shells like Powershell as you mention, and Fish are the closest, and don't take into account a surrounding IDE), the whole stack being written in memory safe languages, minus the underlying bottom layer primitives,

Solaris with NeWS, NeXTSTEP/OS X/macOS, and Inferno are probably the closest to the whole set of ideas, with an UNIX linage.
Hey, Gemma engineer here. Can you please share reports on the type of prompts and the implementation you used?
Is 8 hours of sleep the answer to better health?
People have surrendered to both.

The same logistical challenge exists if you’re captured by an injured person.

Or if one guy has 93 prisoners to manage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9o_Major
It wasnt even about certifications, just identity.

Global remote identity vrrification is not a solved problem, unless you a government and identify your own tax payers, but even that is not universal
Reflecting on your comment I realized that using a huge amount of GPUs is akin to an Turing machine approaching infinite speed. So I think the promise of LLMs writing code is basically saying: if we add a huge number of reading/writing heads with unbounded number of rules, we can solve decideability. Because what is the ability to generate arbitrarily complex code if not solving the halting problem? Maybe there's a more elegant or logical way to postulate this, or maybe I'm just confused or plain wrong, but it seems to me that it is impossible to generate a program that is guaranteed to terminate unless you can solve decideability. And throwing GPUs at a huge tape is just saying that the tape approaches infinite size and the Turing machine approaches infinite speed...

Or put another way, isn't the promise of software that is capable to generate any software given a natural language description in finite time basically assuming P=NP? Because unless the time can be guaranteed to be finite, throwing GPU farms and memory at this most general problem (isn't the promise of using software to generating arbitrary software the same as the promise that any possible problem can be solved in polynomial time?) is not guaranteed to solve it in finite time.
https://zolk3ri.name/cgit/cpudetect/about/ (direct link to the header file: https://zolk3ri.name/cgit/cpudetect/tree/cpudetect.h)

If you are unsure about something, or it misses something you'd like added, feel free to e-mail the author. I am in touch with him at times and he seems friendly.

I remember he wanted to implement more than just detecting CPU instructions, but he did not want to make it bloated with checking for cache sizes and whatnot (can't remember the details).
I'm curious. Is there any value to do these OSS models?

Suddenly after reasoning models, it looks like OSS models have lost their charm
So far we've managed to keep our 2 and a bit year old's tv diet to Bluey, Hey Duggee (a bit crack-y but he loves it and it is still crafted and quite tounge-cheek-funny), Trash Truck (a very calm, sedate one on Netflix, useful if you're travelling and can't get CBeebies) and Down on the Farm (a Cbeebies show where kids do stuff on a farm). Occasionally Kiri and Lou too. And some sports sometimes (football, rugby, cycling, F1). I love the sports as it's distracting but he also doesn't care that much and loses interest. Can be enough to get a break but he won't binge like Duggee or Bluey.

Yes, lucky we're in the UK so have CBeebies available, but there's no reason to not screen and curate your kids media diet. I don't understand people who just let their toddlers consume crap on YT.