skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't know which axe you have to grind, mate, but everything you said seems to be the second-hand—flawed—impression of a foreigner.

You're talking about Germans as if a unified group with a single opinion, which could not be farther from the truth. In the recent elections, we saw extremist parties from both left and right, as well as different centrist opinions, gaining similar share of the public vote. That is not a country that's "totally fine" with mass-murdering 6 million people.

I assume you're speaking of Palestine; let me tell you this. The relationship between Germany and Israel is, for—at least I hope—understandable reasons, a complex one. German citizens currently alive are obviously not personally responsible for the Shoah, but the state of Germany, a fictional construct, will carry this responsibility indefinitely. And that implies, to a certain extent, an obligation to stand on Israel's side. If you don't at least try to understand why this is, and why Germany, as an entity, thinks it is morally correct, then you don't get to tell us how to do our foreign policy.

In Germany, you can absolutely spread pro-Palestine opinions, as long as you don't demand violence against Jews. Blaming the Israelian army for war crimes against Palestinian citizens is fine, and a welcome part of public debate. Again: You may not agree with that policy rooted in the origins of the federal republic of Germany, but it is our policy. Accept that, our leave.

Having said all of this, I, personally, am highly critical of the settlements and the way the war on Hamas was carried out. I'm not fine with mass-murder, but I'm also not fine with terrorist attacks on civilians. This issue is more complex than you try to frame it, and picking a side is a step in the wrong direction. I can condemn terrorist and criminal soldiers and politicians at the same time, without pretending Israel is flawless or Hamas doesn't exist.
Can you clarify what tools and programming language you use? If find that the issue often is wrong tooling, exotic programming languages or frameworks.
Well it's been lost on every C online tutorial I guess

I have not read it so that's on me I guess
In Pascal, it's a distinct operator from field access, though.

What this actually reminds me of is Ada, where you write `value.all` to basically the same effect as Zig's `value.*`. It's as if everything is a struct with itself as a member.
> Model S was released and was competing against flagships like the 7 series and S class

That was Tesla's sales pitch. Model S was no competitor for Mercedes-Benz S-Class. It competed against the E-Class.
Let me know too.

You can get an Azure credit grant and use it to pay for an LLM hosted on Azure.
In all those cases, it is safer to come to a stop - an action advertised by your brake lights - than to continue on without proper visibility.

In fact, I feel confident in saying that based on this comment, you are an unsafe driver and should voluntarily undertake remedial training, as you are unfit to be on the road.
This has been going on for almost 11 hours according to my logs:

Mar 08 17:36:55 ubuntu-vm systemd[1]: Started fetchmail.service - LSB: init-Script for system wide fetchmail daemon.

Mar 09 00:41:55 ubuntu-vm fetchmail[1603]: timeout after 300 seconds waiting for server mail.gandi.net.

Mar 09 00:41:55 ubuntu-vm fetchmail[1603]: socket error while fetching from [REDACTED]@[REDACTED]@mail.gandi.net

Mar 09 00:41:55 ubuntu-vm fetchmail[1603]: Query status=2 (SOCKET)
`
I tried it too and tasked it to do a bigger migration (one web framework to another). It failed pretty bad where I stopped the experiment. It still gave me a headstart where I can take parts and continue the migration manually. But the worst thing was that it did things I didn't asked for like changing the HTML structure and CSS of pages and changing hand picked HEX color codes...

More about my experience on my blog: https://hartenfeller.dev/blog/testing-claude-code
Maybe it has no effect?

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11311906/
Oh I feel your pain. If things were easier to find ... there's less time with a laptop or desktop running on that task, and if the day is busy, more time at night to do other things like sleep.

A couple of the queries you've listed are a bit of a big ask such as "Planning travel where I need specific weather, budget constraints, activity options, and flight times requires dozens of tabs and constant recalculation" - not that doable as an ordinary internet service as IMO it is just too fluid unless the region you want to visit has very stable weather patterns - no doubt in the future there'll be a travel planning LLM to help streamline a road / air / train trip.

The chase finding specifications is a pretty good reason purchasing / procurement offices and the like have their job. It is though a peeve of mine that much of the net is aimed at ordinary folk, and as such so much of those authoring the web page for an unique item seem to miss including a decent list of specifications directly on their web page. A plain list of text of 10 - 50 points beats some external or clever BS that doesn't.

Much of the issue with somewhat meaningless searches is the content in a given website is somewhat lacking. Present times it just seems like amateur hour or the people behind the site thought they saved money by using some cheap as chips means to create their site. They seem in situations where there are requirements or prerequisites, forget it might be useful to list them, if the item has features, why not list all of them as well as point out if for some reason the item doesn't have a function ordinarily expected. I also find too many of service oriented areas are merely a large about blurb.
The code blocks break mobile viewport width. Surely it's better than wrapping, but the best solution is to use max-width and overflow-x: auto which makes them scrollable.
pdf? who is responsible for this sad experience?
That guy leads in with stating that he is missing "autocomplete" in claude code. Cleary a misunderstanding of the scope.
Note here that "complete success" doesn't seem to necessarily mean recovery of vision, just some kinds of testing of corneal health. The article vaguely says that "most" patients had some improvement of vision. I couldn't quickly find discussion of this in the actual study, but the study claims success in proving safety and suggests further investigation is necessary to show therapeutic efficacy.
The only thing Polish politicians are good at is buying with public funds German cars and real estate. Hopefully servilism towards Americans will not be rewarded anymore. Please consider our politicians in the next round of sanctions.
The article did talk about maintainability issues with Python as well.
I have the same experience.

Where AI shines for me is as a form of a semantic search engine or even a tutor of sorts. I can ask for the information that I need in a relatively complex way, and more often than not it will give me a decent summary and a list of "directions" to follow-up on. If anything, it'll give me proper technical terms, that I can feed into a traditional search engine for more info. But that's never the end of my investigation and I always try to confirm the information that it gives me by consulting other sources.
I don't get to code much these days, so I mostly use chatGPT to get occasional helps with scripts and whatnot. I've tried to get help from ChatGPT on a simple javascript/website project that is basically a css/js/html file, but I feel like I don't know how to give the chatbot the code except just pasting it in the prompt. Is Claude better for that, like does it have some IDE or something to play with? Or do people generally use some third party tool for integrations.
For me, personally, I don't think I'd have coped with the constant stress of all these obligations and assignments throughout the year. Much better to have a couple of weeks intense focus at the end of the year, I can manage that.
I guess Musk’s reason for not wearing a suit is because he’s got fuck you money, and also because he has to keep up the tech bro appearance, for Tesla be valued like a car company otherwise.
I would consider frontend tasks using Typescript and React quite standard.
I had a job that became way too easy as time went on. It broke me in unexpected ways I'll likely never recover from, even more than a decade later.
Gleam v1.9
Friend of mine was working in cryptography. His PhD topic was about proving that a cryptographic scheme was secure (for some definition). It took him two months to break the scheme. Sadly, said scheme was key to the funding of his PhD advisor, so the advisor tried to prevent him from publishing findings.

Things end mostly well, with my friend publishing, then restarting his PhD with a different advisor, then leaving academia entirely.
Donnie Darko Website (2002)
Got pretty powerful anxiety effect from it after taking it a while. Definitely not for me.
A similar path was taken in the Node.js world, but it seems the framework in question (AdonisJs) is far from being that successful.

Given the standard batteries included in Go, I think there is even less chess for this to succeed.

But still that is a good thing to try.
Why not.
All the best.
> In the described situation I think the best option is to be able and use the right buttons quickly, sticking to the original subject of the discussion.

Yes, obviously, but poorly designed or failed equipment does not absolve you of your responsibility to drive safely.

> Even if a million scenarios and alternatives can be thought of, what's the point of derailing a discussion focused on a particular subject?

The topic is road safety and the point is both pertinent and revealing. The attitude in your comment and others are highlighting basic failures in driver training, independent of the equipment design.

Honestly, I think you should reflect on your attitude here before you end up a road traffic statistic.
Coffee and tea are very interesting. I can drink caffeinated tea without any issues. But for some reason caffeinated coffee will trigger an acne break out several days later. It took a long time for me to connect this link.
> There are no published human trials as of October 2015

This has changed: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9786204/

Notably, though, their results indicate effects on cognition and memory, which the OP's experiments don't seem to address.
It's remarkably intuitive and sensible if you remember that . in Zig auto-dereferences for field access and then treat `*` in this construct as field name denoting the entire object.

Ada does the same exact thing, except there you write `p.all` instead.

In any case, while the exact syntax may not be ideal, using a postfix operator for dereferencing is vastly better than prefix in practice due to typical patterns of use. There's a reason why you end up writing () a lot in C code with heavy pointer operations - the things they end up mixed with most often turn out to have the wrong kind of priority and/or precedence more often than not. Things are much simpler when everything is postfix and code reads naturally left-to-right.
US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s
There's a great podcast by Andrew Huberman on dopamine I listened to last week where he discusses theanine at the end. It's a fantastic (but 3 hour long) primer[0] for anyone wanting to learn more.

[0] https://www.hubermanlab.com/episode/controlling-your-dopamin...
Point / Counterpoint on Rodgers' Extension (2013)
We should have two distinct, independent LLMs: one generates the code, the other one the tests.
Wonderful news. I get the value of touch screens for appropriate cases but it's excellent to see common sense return.

Countering the hidden/inaccessible nature of touch screen buttons is the obvious point but also the return to physical buttons stops engineers from randomly moving controls with each new software update - that's what ruins things with much regular desktop software: you learn something, the layout is committed to memory and then three months later the feature is moved!

It's then massively harder to find - you almost never find yourself thinking "ah thank you for moving that, now it's better!"
Maybe a better analysis would be placing it between other industries to compare its uselessness/usefulness?
'It's a superpower': how walking makes us healthier, happier and brainier (2019)
What a weird take, in 99.999% of cases you don’t have such a black/white contrast
> That is the moat that Pepsi has been trying to overcome for decades.

Pepsi makes more revenue compared to Coke. Shouldn't it be Coke who should be trying to do what Pepsi is doing?
I just don't understand how this can be this slow. What on earth is it doing to get 193 requests per second on static, cached content?

The article doesn't dig too deep into this sadly, rather just accepts that it's slow and uses a different tool.

But seriously, this is responding to a request with the content of a file. How can it be 100,000x slower than the naive solution. What can it possibly be doing, and why is it maxxing out the CPU?

If no-one else looks into this, I might get around to it.
The idea that there would be no nuclear retaliation the moment Russia launches any known nukes is ridiculous. If they actually launch a nuke, any non instantaneous retaliation will be too late.

The reason the EU countries don’t just waltz into Ukraine probably has more to do with the knowledge they’re not dealing with a rational person, but with a bunch of ego. It’s not hard to predict how Putin will respond if his ego is threatened, but how the rest of Russia will respond to the command to launch nukes.

It’s not unlike the US, except it’s currently still fairly easy to predict that any US commander will just say no when ordered to fire on the EU.
I find cline to be incredible about 80% of the time for creating new concept websites or python scripts. I use it with Open router and choose Claude exclusively. I’d CC is the next step we are headed in a crazy and scary direction.
Yeah, I’m also like that.

Infinitely curious and motivated when there’s a vague and nebulous problem in the future, as long as I can sorta see my improvements along the way.

But assignments, idk, I don’t put as much of my curiosity on it. I was terrible at coursework and wonderful at tests largely for this reason.
"All I want is a refund!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQaavQNGsMY
Show HN: Fusio 5.2 released – open-source API management platform
They know enough to understand which way should their ignorance be pointed to support their worldview.

I've seen this countless times, I'm from eastern Poland, we had our own MAGA ruling for 8 years, and eastern Poland is where most of their voters come from.

When it benefits these people - they understand enough to know what the mainstream opinion is and they don't oppose it.

When it does not support their worldview - they suddenly stop believing the experts or forget what the expert opinion is.

Ignorance is not the root cause. It's a protection mechanism.

It's fascinating to watch at first, but after 8 years of this I'm just tired.
I mostly posted the video because I thought it was a good demonstration of the prompts to approve/cost that the tweet was talking about.

He talks about it later of using autocomplete vs complete writing, I don't think he misunderstood the scope just talking about the difference of ways ai can be used for coding assistant.
Ah, the Joe Rogan of medicine.
an effect large enough to be
apparent just from plotting

And how large is that? Without putting a number on it, how do we come to the conclusion that the effect is not large enough? That it didn't show in their sample of data points could have been just random chance.

But before we take the measured effects at face value, I think it's important think about them more. They report significant p values of their success in predicting if the capsule holds Theanine and also for the effect of the capsule when it holds Theanine. Both negative correlations. My first thought reading this is that the Placebo tasted more like Theanine and thinking they took Theanine had a positive effect on the outcome.
Last year I realized I could block things on facebook with the ublock ad blocker. Now when I go to facebook there's a clean empty page and I can navigate to just what I want to see. If you're using something app based that won't work though
Sidenote: thank you for using twitter dot com instead of x. This is a little detail and I'm sure I'm not the only one appreciating it.
I mean it was all laid out in front of everyone...

https://www.project2025.observer
I'm somewhat disturbed by the idea that anyone would think that you shouldn't stop when "driving in even semi-dense traffic in any bigger city" if you can't see. Of course you should slowly come to a halt and put warning slights on to give people time to react, but not coming to a stop in such a situation seems at the very least highly negligent.
Sure, stopping in the middle of the road will be annoying to other drivers, but it's generally preferred to annoy people over killing them.
I think it's probably the difference between "code" and "programming". An LLM can produce code and if you're willing to surrender to the LLMs version of whatever it is you ask for, then you can have a great and productive time. If you're opinionated about programming, LLMs fall short. Most people (software engineers, developers, whatever) are not "programmers" they're "coders" which is why they have a positive impression of LLMs: they produce code, LLMs produce code... so LLMs can do a lot of their work for them.

Coders used to be more productive by using libraries (e.g: don't write your own function for finding the intersection of arrays, use intersection from Lodash) whereas now libraries have been replaced by LLMs. Programmers laughed at the absurdity of left-pad[1] ("why use a dependency for 16 lines of code?") whereas coders thought left-pad was great ("why write 16 lines of code myself?").

If you think about code as a means to an end, and focus on the end, you'll get much closer to the magical experience you see spoken about on Twitter, because their acceptance criteria is "good enough" not "right". Of course, if you're a programmer who cares about the artistry of programming, that feels like a betrayal.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Npm_left-pad_incident
Yeah I have had some "magic" moments where I knew "what" I needed, had an idea of "how it would look",but no idea how to do it and ai helped me understand how I should do it instead of the hacky very stupid way I would have done it
Here’s six jailed bankers named in two stories:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-68595204

https://www.cityam.com/former-barclays-trader-jay-merchant-j...
Exactly same experience: since the early-access GPT-3 days, I played out various scenarios, and the most useful case has always been to use generativeAI as semantic search. It's generative features are just lacking in quality (for anything other than a toy project), and the main issues since the early GPT days remains, even though it gets better, it's still too unreliable for (mid-complex systems) serious work. Also, if you don't pay attention, it messes up other parts of the code.
Maybe it’s the shot up plane effect; we only see the winners but rarely see the failures. Leads us to wrong or incorrect conclusions.

Finding the right prompt to have current generation AI create the magic depicted in twitter posts may be a harder problem than most anticipate.
You're talking around what they're doing. Yes I agree with all those things you're saying but they're not contrary to what I'm saying.

You agree efficiency would be good, but as I say this is not what the government is doing, blunt cuts to everything is not efficiency.

Yes competitive markets could be better but this is not the case here. As I say you could rely on some benevolent oligarch to pay the dividend down but that's not guaranteed. The proposed tax cuts are for the richest not the average person, they're also "less competitive", part of government is regulating the market to ensure it remains competitive as it's naturally not. Their actions so far are anti-competitive such as the removal of the CFPB which levels the playing field. The government also funds crucial high risk, low reward activities that are necessary to drive growth elsewhere (economic multipliers), they've made it clear they intend cutting these, such as cutting scientific research funding that wouldn't have been investigated otherwise.

Overall they are currently not doing anything that you mention.
You have to learn and figure out how to prompt it. My experience with Claude Code is this: one time it produces an incredible result; another time it's an utter failure. There are prompt tips and tricks which have enormous influence on the end result.
Same here. In some cases, brainstorming even kinda works – I mean, it usually gives very bad responses, but it serves as a good duck.

Code? Nope.
Also muscle cramps. I like to stretch out all my muscles when I first wake up while still in bed and when I don't supplement magnesium this has sometimes triggered cramps in leg muscles. When supplementing magnesium this never happen, and the stretched muscles feel better, more relaxed.
It seems like every middling company out there wants to bolt in popular architecture from other languages into Go, particularly Java enterprise patterns. Why not use the actual language or framework your engineers like instead?
I have asthma triggered by Volatile Organic Compounds. I good activated charcoal room air filter did wonders for me.
I am pretty sure that "the Earth orbited the Sun 1,000 years ago", and I think I could make a pretty solid argument about it from human observations of the behavior of, well, everything, around and after the year AD 1025.

It seems that there was an alternating occurences of "days" and "nights" of approximatively the same length as today.

A comparison of the ecosystem and civilization of the time vs. ours are fairly consistent with the hypothesis that the Earth hasn't seen the kind of major gravity disturbances that would have happened if our planet only got captured into Sun orbit within the last 1,000 years.

If your AI rates my claim as an error, it might have too many false positives to be of much use, don't you think?
I don't use Chrome or a Chromium based browser, I voted with my feet to the only browser who at least made a face value attempt to be better.

Explain why when they changed their stance me holding them to a standard I hold all other browsers is now an issue.
> Everyone from SMBC to the NY Times would put all of their content behind a paywall, or in an app, or something else that's worse than the status quo right?

The NYT already puts its content behind a pay wall, and SMBC (as of this update) doesn't rely on third party ads either. So it's not clear that something else would be worse than the status quo for them.

Some content creators would certainly suffer, but if online ads were not normalized, others would thrive.
> ...many C programs will compile just fine with a C++ compiler

Unfortunately(?) that's only true for C code written in the early 90s or specifically for the common C/C++ subset (which is essentially a subset of both C and C++ based on a non-standard snapshot of C ca 1995).

Since C99, the two languages have diverged enough that C is no longer a subset of C++, and IMHO propagating the idea that there's a 'C subset' in C++ 25 years after the 'schism' is harmful both for C and C++.
It's not that straightforward for SSR applications, however yes SSG is offered by a lot of frameworks and next's build times are horrendous in 2025. I'm glad to see the status quo changing
Im on the other side of the spectrum. With a small dose of caffeine I get really wired, my blood pressure rises, my head hurts, I feel stressed, anxious and I can’t sleep at night even if the coffee was in the morning. With matcha it’s a similar effect but it’s less anxiety and more headache.