skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And it's still a "!!!DRAFT!!!" ending with a TODO that ended up on the front page?
The "sum" and "product" is more about the cardinality of the type. If you have a type A with 3 possible values and B with 5 possible values, then the sum type X = A+B has 8 possible distinct values while the product type Y = A*B has 15 possible values
> Otherwise the relationship is built on deceit and will eventually erode.

From watching friends use dating apps and go on dates: People with misleading profiles don't get very far. The lies get spotted quickly, often on the first date.

The people who play these games seem to be hoping that the other person will look past it, or that they can charm their way around it if they could just lie their way to the first encounter.

For 100% of my friends, it's a dealbreaker when they discover someone has been lying.

This isn't limited to text. The most common one is when people use photos from 5-10 years ago. I've heard so many stories of people arriving to first dates and barely recognizing the person because they're a decade older or significantly less physically fit. At this point it's almost like they're pleasantly surprised when the person they meet looks like their profile pictures.
I think add-ons are an added complexity that needlessly increases the attack surface. I'd rather not use them, just like some people don't like to use Javascript. I have a bunch of bookmarklets that do everything I want. Something as essential as managing containers should imho be fixed at the browser level, not by an add-on. I don't like it when essential security features are bolted on top of software as an afterthought.
UK here - not 20 minutes ago, sat in rural Kent, I picked up my wife’s iPhone to see the “E” at the top. Haven’t seen one in ages (I’m on a 3G+ only network, 3), and assumed we had shut it down.
I don't think so, 'deformation' can also just mean any arbitrary change of shape, and in a physics/engineering context, that's usually all it means.

From websters:

1. alteration of form or shape
also : the product of such alteration
2: the action of deforming : the state of being deformed
3: change for the worse

so it's just sense 1.
That’s very misleading to state. If you look at all polls about DOGE and related topics, you will find DOGE approval is relatively low while the ostensible DOGE mandates have the approval closer to 70% that you’re talking about.

Yet these are not the same things. DOGE has done many things already which upset and discourage people. Come to Canada where the sentiment towards DOGE seems very negative, you will still see a great desire for improved government efficiency.

DOGE is not as well-loved as a poll about government efficiency will make it seem. Almost everyone wants improved efficiency. Many people think their public service needs cuts. Not everyone thinks the way DOGE does it makes sense.
Hence 'conveniently overlooking'.
> The problem isn't within Google. They aren't doing anything substantial to lock users into Chrome.

I feel this is meant to trigger people into reacting and causing a flame war.

Google has been making its own web properties work well on Google Chrome while making them perform poorer or make them break on other browsers. Google Chrome optimizes for Google, not the web, and certainly not “the open web”.
https://archive.is/8tRF6
I don’t think it’s much better when I’m asking for a chunk of code, but the autocomplete is an improvement over not having it for me. Also I like being able to easily give it a relevant file from the code and having it follow my style/use the libraries I’m using etc. without having to type all that stuff out in the prompt. I think it’s worth having it in the editor, but it’s not as good as it needs to be for some of what they say it can do yet.
Hey folks, we at June (YC W21) built an open-source app store for Claude which makes installing MCPs in Claude super easy. We've been using MCPs within Claude for a while and found them super useful, for example, with the Slack and Linear MCPs, we can ask Claude to find the last bug a customer reported in a shared slack channel and open an issue on Linear with all the details.

We found that installing MCPs was not the most straightforward experience, especially for someone who doesn't have Python and Node set up on their computer. So we built a desktop app that handles the complexity of installing the right tools in the environment to make MCP installation super easy.

The app itself is open-source and it runs only on your machine. Your data only goes to Anthropic when you ask Claude to do something with it. You can find the GitHub repo here: https://github.com/fleuristes/fleur. We also have an app registry where you can submit more MCPs: https://github.com/fleuristes/app-registry. We're making sure that every MCP we add works really well because we found a ton of them which had errors and didn't work. We're also trying to figure out a way to make the Google OAuth flow very smooth before we add the Gmail and Calendar MCPs.

Let us know what you think!
> The confident incorrectness they breed is a problem.

Looking at America here in 2025, it sure seems like the confidently incorrect are confidently and successfully convincing the submorons that they are correct, despite their both being incorrect.

I sure seems like a kind of tensegrity of willful ignorances.

But definitely there are a shitton of folks that are both far too stupid to know how stupid they are, while also being way too overconfident that they're smarter than the actual smart folks. Dunning-Kruger really exposed the majorities.

And there's that quote about change only coming when the old generation dies out; not because they willingly learned and humbly levelled themselves up.
TFA explicitly sets out to contrast the two:

> The Lord of the Rings on the other hand — the more seriously you take Middle Earth, the dumber you get about Roundworld.

> ...

> The thought I began with, that The Lord of the Rings, whatever its merits as a fantasy tale, is brain-rot for the technological mind, is one that I find so obvious it feels barely worth stating.

It's honestly hard to read the piece because of how clearly visible the author's sneer towards those who love Tolkien is.
Unfortunately it might be a bit challenging as there’s a nontrivial amount of extra computation we do for the viz, but it’s probably possible?
Someone on Reddit suspected this 3 years ago.

https://www.reddit.com/r/embedded/comments/wopjw8/how_sure_a...
I did this with a couple hundred big box MS-DOS games around 2002.
right, getting incorrect output from an LLM deterministically might be challenging
This is a bonus of using Vue then if this kind of code doesn't pose a problem there?

Makes me wonder why this is all so difficult. Vue has a lot less problems for me than previous iterations and frameworks, but it's still frustrating how many footguns still exist. Like gotchas where you lose reactivity where linters/compilers won't catch the problem for you, and you forget the gotchas if you're not immersed in that framework for a while.

I'm not getting why we can't have robust static checking for this stuff vs trusting every developer to be careful.
It may be field specific, but I've also never heard of anyone running a manuscript through a plagiarism checker in chemistry.
I thought this was about mundane tasks too?
I've heard it described as the most advanced drive train in the world with the body of a 1990s Kia on top.
Depends on one's goals. If simply hooking up is the objective, although it's disingenuous/dishonest, this would improve one's odds.
That came as a shift for me. In the early aughts I had long online conversations before meeting. I took it as a way to show that I was serious.

One of those turned into a decade long relationship, and when I returned, the time horizon was much shorter. I think too many women had been jerked around by men who never wanted to meet (perhaps because they were married).

Things have shifted yet again with the prevalence of bots and scammers. Which is too bad, because it had been an environment that suited me well: getting to know someone in a safe way, and to show them who I was.
Yes, parental responsibility is perhaps the most critical component of kid safety.

However, I know of no children who independently acquired and maintain a device with a connection to the internet. Are you entirely sure we need a governmental edict to allow parents to monitor and influence what their kids see and do online?

Should law enforcement be able to access messages sent to my kid? I'm going to have to say no to this one.
Not a paid solution, but great for testing models yourself: AWS bedrock.

Wonky documentation (definitely released too early), but imo the best model agnostic diy solution out there.
Languages influence design, and application influences design. That means they influence each other.
Germany has its own planes certified for use with US nuclear warheads. Any strike command would need to be a joint US + DE decision.

I could imagine that Germany replaces the US warheads with French or even British ones, but not actual ownership of nuclear warheads, nor a situation where a single foreign nation could make the decision to start nukes from German soil without German approval.
Unless documented and reproducible, it does not exist. This was the minimum guide when I worked with researchers.

I plus 1 your doubt in the last paragraph.
Perhaps our collective memories are too short? Did we forget what curl just went through with AI confabulated bug reports[1]?

[1]: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2024/01/02/the-i-in-llm-stands-f...
Because the entire statement is exhausting to try and parse - nearly unreadable because you flip the genders back and forth at random. Whatever you were trying to say is completely lost behind it.

Edit: also I have no idea where you got “get a cleaning support” from, maybe a badly literalised translation for “cleaner”? Otherwise I’m not sure what english gendered term would elicit that reaction, housemaid seems too regular, “french maid” maybe? That might hit the archaic and loaded sexist implications? Otherwise, if not english, then I’m afraid perhaps the situation doesn’t directly translate well.
That's a feature that a lot of people like about HN. That said you can have as much privacy on HN as you want you have to facilitate it yourself though. If you are too lazy to use the platform as you want, it might just not be the right platform for you. Also catering to fringe users like you and their "rights" they feel obliged to never worked for any platform.
Being able to have a machine double check your work for problems that you fix or dismiss as false seems great? If the bad part is "AI knows best" - I agree with that! Properly deployed, this would be another tool in line with peer review that helps the scientific community judge the value of new work.
This sentence from the Reference is important:

> The exact assembly code syntax is target-specific and opaque to the compiler
> except for the way operands are substituted into the template string to form
> the code passed to the assembler.

You can verify that rustc doesn't validate the contents of asm!() by telling it to emit the raw LLVM IR:

% cat bogus.rs
#![no_std]
pub unsafe fn bogus_fn() {
core::arch::asm!(".bogus");
core::arch::asm!("bogus");
}
% rustc --crate-type=lib -C panic=abort --emit=llvm-ir -o bogus.ll bogus.rs
% cat bogus.ll
[...]
; bogus::bogus_fn
; Function Attrs: nounwind
define void @_ZN5bogus8bogus_fn17h0e38c0ae539c227fE() unnamed_addr #0 {
start:
call void asm sideeffect alignstack ".bogus", "~{cc},~{memory}"(), !srcloc !2
call void asm sideeffect alignstack "bogus", "~{cc},~{memory}"(), !srcloc !3
ret void
}

That IR is going to get passed to llvm-as and possibly onward to an external assembler, which is where the actual validation of instruction mnemonics and assembler directives happens.

---

The difference between llvm_asm!() and asm!() is in the syntax of the stuff outside of the instructions/directives -- LLVM's "~{cc},~{memory}" is what llvm_asm!() accepts more-or-less directly, and asm!() generates from backend-independent syntax.

I have an example on my blog of calling Linux syscalls via inline assembly in C, LLVM IR, and Rust. Reading it might help clarify the boundary: https://john-millikin.com/unix-syscalls#inline-assembly
China has a lot of users.
Long time ago the European company I worked for tried getting into the US market. They embarked on looking for potential clients and partners. Soon after they discovered that the American counterparts wouldn't even want to talk to them let alone schedule formal meetings if the titles were "project manager", "product manager" or similar. The company started changing roles renaming most managers to VPs.
Aragorn can't defeat Sauron, though, and he knows it. His role in the final victory is to distract Sauron, who assumes that the ring will be used against him by a "somebody" like Aragorn, rather than destroyed by nobodies.
I think OTP is pretty much universally admired, the language syntax and tooling much less so.

Erlangers generally dismiss criticisms about syntax as unimportant, but looking at the popularity of Elixir (which compiles to the same VM) suggests they're wrong about discounting syntax as important when it comes to adoption. Another new language that targets the BEAM VM is Gleam, which looks fantastic.

From reading Armstrong's stories about the origins of Erlang, it seems to me the Prolog syntax was an accident of history and a pragmatic engineering decision at the time, more than it was the deliberate choice of a careful language designer. That suggests that other options shouldn't be dismissed.
Run r1 671b at a q6 quant?
What do you mean LLMs are bad at images? GPT or Claude can read text perfectly, and describe what's in a picture in a lot of detail. I feel like replacing OCR is one of the few things you can actually trust them for.
“Why don’t you just get a cleaner?” is not a subject I’d introduce anywhere near the start of a relationship.
France were sort of guests and Niger asked them to leave. You can't easily maintain that presence. He may not nuke Russia because Warsaw is occupied, but that's a different kettle of fish.
I don't disagree with your main point but you really overstate Maslow’s hierarchy quite a bit.

It is a framework to start thinking about how needs can be prioritized but is does not necessary reflect the actual hierarchy of needs of individuals which is very culturally, economically and well individually dependent. People are naturally different and have different needs. Humans are way too complex for such a simple pyramid to provide accurate answers.
It's not the future we need but it's the one we deserve. This place is heavily complicit in the popularity of AI. It creams its pants any time a new LLM is announced.
Gotta say I expected this to be the wifi system. Most of the code on the ESP-32 is given as source, but the wifi driver is not.

https://github.com/esp32-open-mac/esp32-open-mac
The attention demo code is in the /attention_demo directory if you want to try it on your own messages too :)
That would have to make it to the timestamp on the file system. And whenever a post is modified, that would also have to make it to the file system. Currently this doesn’t seem to be there.
Main argument against starting with Color of Magic would be that it's different enough from the rest of the series that it's not entirely useful for knowing whether you'll want to read the rest.

It and Light Fantastic are both fantasy-parody travelogues, which are mostly about the protagonists moving through a sequence of largely disconnected pastiches of other fantasy works. After this the series rapidly switches to fantasy as metaphor for real-world situations, with the fantasy elements being more broad tropes rather than specifics references.
> But I do love his (historically accurate by lore?) description of elves.

Yeah, more or less. The “elves/fairies are nice, or at least _good_” thing is a fairly modern creation (owing a lot to Tolkien, really).
That screams "moral hazard"[1] to me. See also the incident with curl and AI confabulated bug reports[2].

[1]: Maybe not in the strict original sense of the phrase. More like, an incentive to misbehave and cause downstream harm to others.
[2]: https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2024/01/02/the-i-in-llm-stands-f...
multi-modal models trained on videos and text already learn through 3 senses. google and others already connected these to arms (with very limited tactile information though). we wouldn't deny intelligence to people with disabilities. a model which was force-fed more than any human can ever experience is an alien intelligence, but the model it creates internally seems sufficient in many ways. if you accept the ability to do 'cold reasoning' as intelligence I'd say we are pretty close.
I'd like that with a portion of vimperator please :)
It’s geared towatds Android mostly, though it might be possble to adapt it for desktop.
In the video he mentions he got the old projector basically for free but a laser projector would have been ideal ignoring cost.
I see them in a lot of places in europe too.
Funny that I just pulled out an ESP32 dev kit a couple days ago and I honestly questioned myself with "how do you even know these things are secure at all?" Glad I know the answer now.

I'm starting to miss the days of being disconnected more and more as time goes on. This constant churn of having to monitor and lockdown everything you own down is becoming a complete negative.
I used both at the time. I think you are overstating the difference. There wasn't as much full-on JS on the web and for all the things people normally did, FF did not struggle at all.

If Chrome had been aimed primarily at IE, they could have continued to fund Firefox, or could have worked with Mozilla to do whatever improvements they wanted. For example, if the objective had been speed, Google had so much clout with Mozilla at the time that I feel pretty certain they could have contributed to building something like v8 into Firefox.

But it wasn't about any of that. It was about owning the browser because they decided it was in their strategic interest. And that's because their business was by that point entirely funded by people's eyeballs in a browser, looking at ads.
In my experience, women who don't communicate well via text also don't communicate well in person. Dyslexia is a real thing, and there are other challenges, but when I got a bad feeling from her written communication it boded very badly for a date.

I don't date men, but the women I've dated often say that's their experience as well. Of course, those are women who also matched my communication style, so that may not generalize.
Couldn’t agree more. AI is an extra layer of indirection and distorted expectations that are not needed in dating apps. Imagine a world where AI agents that deal with other AI agents deciding what’s good for you. What could go bad?
I actually met some of the people building these types of company, they completely blank when you bring up ethical concerns and unintended consequences. I'd love a townhall event with one of them just so the world could see the type of men behind these dating apps.
The next world war seems like it’ll be about five minutes long. Nukes won’t be required to send us back to the Stone Age.
From me because you turned a thread about online dating into a missive that reads "woke feminists today, amirite?"
I heard it's really difficult to measure the success of these rollouts because the cat-eared robots put the food on the table and then push it off.
late 30s is the prime dating market for men when scales tip towards their favor. enjoy!!
If you like that headline, you will love this movie:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0298814/
EDIT: My Spanish isn't very good, but reading the slides it doesn't sound like the vulnerability is likely to be remotely exploitable, it sounds like it's only an issue if the chip is in HCI mode and being used as a bluetooth adapter. If someone who speaks Spanish could confirm I would be very appreciative.
We live among idiots, my friend. And a shitton of them are right here on HN, and with damn high karma because there's nothing an idiot loves more than another idiot to validate their idiocy. And they always go Yosemite Sam on anyone who explains exactly what kind of stupid they are.

What they lack in intelligence, however, they MORE than make up for in confidence.

"Same as it ever was." --Talking Heads
This sounds way, way out of how LLMs work. They can't count the R's in strarwberrrrrry, but they can cross reference multiple tables of data? Is there something else going on here?
You mean all our devices refusing to work for us at a switch of a button?
That's my point. It reminds me of when the greatest smart contract writers in the world got "hacked" by what was in the retrospect, a rookie error. We now have ETH and ETC which no one at the time (I'm a former miner) would have thought was possible.
Yes, I have tried to enjoy Pratchett and have the same feeling. I read Guards, Guards! and found it amusing for about 50 pages, then it became tedious, hitting the same notes over and over. I would have enjoyed a short story about Carrot, I think.
I'm confused, is it that the bluetooth stack has a few undocumented commands? if these are only accessible to the code already running on the device, I'm not sure I would call it a backdoor
There's also a ton of false positives with spellcheck on scientific papers, but it's obviously a useful tool. Humans review the results.
Python is great for library orchestration and has tons of support for almost anything you need. So if you aren't building a large application and don't need concurrency, its great.
Java is great for building large applications with large teams, since it limits how code is shared and how libraries are built, and has a culture of convention. Golang has greate concurrency support and meta programming support, so its awesome for web servers and plugging into systems that incorporate orchestration technologies. C++ and Rust are fast and efficient as hell when you need that. JavaScript is your only viable option when you need complex and interactive UI that's OS agnostic.
> I can push a terraform PR, get approved, but I won't actually know whether what I did was valid until you try to push it live

Our concession to this risk was that once a merge request was approved, the automation was free to to run the apply pipeline step, leaving open the very likely possibility that TF shit itself. However, since it wasn't actually merged yet, push fixes until TF stopped shitting itself

I'm cognizant that solution doesn't "scale," in that if you have a high throughput repo those merge requests will almost certainly clash, but it worked for us because it meant less merge request overhead (context switching). It also, obviously, leveraged the "new pushes revoke merge request approval" which I feel is good hygiene but some places are "once approved, always approved"
Austrians do it ("einspänner" and "melange") - Germans and French will have that (called "wiener" style or "vienois"). Italians have their "Espresso con panna" (literally: "Espresso with cream") - would also use. The Swiss will often take their coffee with cream too. In Czech republic it's "kafe se šlehačkou", in Greece it's common in capuccinos or added at will to black coffee.

Whipped creme is perhaps the most common form (cream + sugar whipped).

Not sure about "half and half" though, think that's just an American thing / product.
Is this vuln. fixable via firmware or is the vulnerability inherent in the chip architecture?
I think Susannah Clarke is the only living author I can think of who would inspire the same enthusiasm from me upon news of a new book from them. Alas, she is not quite as prolific as PTerry :)

Mustn't grumble though, it's not like Jonathan Strange was a pamphlet!
Send emails directly from Cursor with this email sending MCP server
MenuetOS: A 32-bit OS on a single floppy disk [video]