skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"The US Government" is not some 20-something unvetted staffer hired on a whim because Elon liked something he said on a Twitch stream. Again, write it down. DOGE is a huge security hole and these people are not motivated by a genuine interest in the public good. This will go badly.
What's so awkward about that?

Do you also tip just because there's a line behind you and the self-service cashier tells you the machine "is going to ask you a question"?
I don't buy the "ignored" part.

It's not like in authoritarian countries where their votes just go down to trash. It's not like they cannot voice their opinion or organize demonstrations. I agree there is a sentiment of "I'm ignored", but at any point in time it's up to them to not being ignored in democratic society.
That doesn't work, as that startup's based in the USA. If you haven't been paying to space policy, the US government is currently *compelling* US space companies to shut off services to Ukraine,

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43289805 ("US satellite company Maxar reportedly cuts off Ukraine's access to imagery", 75 comments)
He is saving American money for American people as was promised. You just don't like the fact that the world is heading towards de-globalisation because of whatever other political belief you have that you aren't sharing like most people here.
I'm ignorant of Typst. But you're missing an important problem with Latex. Packages are really fragile. The most important property of a programming language is compositionality, and Latex has so little of that that I'm generally afraid of picking up packages because I've wasted so many hours trying to get them to play nice.

I still use Latex because of the output quality and the sunk cost..but we can clearly do better
Snecma Gripen would be pretty sick.
>Your assertion that "DNS is originally a mechanism to convert hierarchical numerical ip adresses with geographical info" is incorrect; geography has nothing to do with it.

Your assertion that my assertion is incorrect is incorrect, maybe your understanding of the subject matter is restricted to textbook definitions and you can't handle words and definitions in an order that is different than the intro sentence on the wikipedia page for DNS.

IP addresses contain geographic information (hierarchically), maybe reread my sentence. Incidentally domains also contain geographical information, albeit strictly of the domains. See all TLDs, and even non-TLDs like .COM and inevitably linked to a geography and jurisdiction, namely VeriSign (which is the TLD registrar) is a US company and is the ultimate authority for those records.

>By your definition, every CDN is a hack.

I'm not exactly sure how CDNs operate, my understanding is that they host the same data on multiple locations on the globe and redirct to the nearest location? They use domains to route to the nearest ip, and use HTTP mechanisms for explicitly proxying content. Seems like all is used as design. The only exception would be if a single IP address points to multiple geodistributed servers like 8.8.8.8, that is indeed a hack.

>Is Dynamic DNS a hack

Yes, god, yes. It's also something no reputable sysadmin or programmer does. It's a technique used by people who can't afford a domain name, or convince an ISP to unblock their ports.

> If you set up a public DNS server to serve internal addresses that nobody else can access unless they're on your internal network, is that a hack?

I don't think so, no.

Counterpoint.

If a DNS server converts empty responses into an ad server (dsajndjandsa.com redirects to ISP's page with ads), is that a hack? Hint it's not theoretical, actually happened.

It's similar to an ad blocking DNS, but in the inverse, it's an ad adding DNS. If your answer is different, it's because your definition of a hack is loaded with your ethical position.
Registration should have zero to do with providing patient care; if it does, you’ve got a great grounds for a lawsuit if anything goes wrong, and it’s also blatantly illegal for an ER to do that.

Last few times I’ve been in the ER, the registration guy didn’t come around until we were already in an ER hospital bed and waiting around after being triaged.

There may be really terribly run hospitals who risk lawsuits (or have already been sued for millions) - I would avoid such places.
Not yet, afaik the rust4linux devs thus want to create a rust frontend for GCC (gccrs)
I do.

I think there's another dimension of temporal tolerance to consider.

There have been times in my life where I consumed a lot of caffeine, and it brought on the paradoxical sleepy effect.

And other times where I tried to eliminate caffeine, and a fallen-off-the-wagon strong dose gets me jittery, but acclimation happens in 24-48 hours.
This has to be flagged.
One would think it would be a bit beneficial to have some allies in that war...
I know. That's the theory and mostly the practice.

Only, ask your military to return against your just previous allies (at your own initiative) among which the one that helped your very nation to fight for its independence, with which you did cross-training and exercises, for the past 80 years... everyone is in for quite a bumpy road.
LiveDrop Wirelessly Moves Data Using Dynamic QR Codes and Cameras
Who Gets to Do Strategy?
This is just crazy. The speed at which the US reputation gets burned is simply mind blowing. Americans might think that nobody pays attention, but everyone does. The Finns are already evaluating how to do without weapons systems that the US could potentially “switch off”. Ditto for anyone having F35s.

The consequences of the antics of this administration (and Musk is part of it, no doubt) will be very far reaching. One of the more obvious consequences being the loss of credibility.
> Approximately 46 pennies on every dollar that exists has been printed or misspent in the last 5 years.

What does this even mean?

And do you realize that most of American GDP prowess in the last 40 years was driven by running a trade deficit and letting the world loan the money back to the US?
It is still to reduce cost. Hiring would often be in cheaper geographies. The reason to reduce cost is not to e.g. save a business from collapsing but it is to improve the financial results with the hope of making the stock price go up.
No it's not. For HPC good software support for the vector extension is basically everything that matters, and the framework main board doesn't support that extension.

I would currently recommend the BananaPI BPI-F3 or the OrangePI RV2 for that purpose, as they both have the same SpacemiT X60 cores, which support the vector extension.

Sadly there are currently only in-order cores with RVV support available. Getting a cheap out-of-order implementation is the next most important thing for improving software support.

Tenstorrent has announced they will release a 8x Ascalon devboard and laptop next year: https://youtu.be/ttQtC1dQqwo?t=1035
Seems this project is MIT-licensed. That is fine, but I cannot help this is a way to get Corporations from following the GPL.

I wonder if Linux is re-written i rust will it too remove GPL as a factor ?

Again due to the license choice I tend to believe this can be seen as a way to move Linux to a Microsoft Type Windows System.
It's the root of the problem imo. However, with the majority of the population on a middle school reading comprehension level, it's impossible to explain.
Exactly. For Ukraine, a peace treaty now that allows Russia to regroup and invade again in N years is not really helpful.
But is it given so much importance by the politicians?

The reason I ask is that here in Romania the issue is completly fabircated by the social media and amplified by the algorithm. What I mean there was not a single law pro LGBTQ passed in Romania, the educational system is not teaching children about LGBTQ, there are no changes in schools or other places to unixes bathrooms, no forced or assisted transitioning programs.

It is just media with conspiracies like the COVID vaccines makes you gay, 5G makes you gay, Bruxelles wants to make your children gay, Soros wants to make the children gay. There are also staged video with transexuals making a circus and shared on TikTok. So now we have a lot of idiots that actually thinks that we need to surrender to Putin so he can kill the traitors and the gays.
Also an embedded server[0] and a PHP framework [1].

[0] https://makoserver.net/

[1] https://makoframework.com/
My personal farfetched alternative theory is the "Earth X" theory.

Earth X was a comic (lol) with one interesting idea — if enough people preceive "A" as "B", "A" becomes "B".

In the case of Trump, he despises the left wing camp for kicking him off Twitter and prosecuting him. As such he takes their nightmares that they believed in term one and makes them real as personal revenge. For an old man, it is no doubt the most satisfying possible end of his life possible.

Far fetched but more realistic than "He's being blackmailed". Do you really believe the man has any shame?
Change Is Hard
Maybe I'm expecting too much, but for me the only good reason a CEO is paid more than any actually useful employee of the company is to anticipate this kind of thing and use the money from their leadership position in the old tech to invest and not be in a very bad position with the new tech.
Ask HN: Why ChatGPT's memory is so less?
Why chatgpt's memory is so less even in the pro plan. Why I need to delete and clear the memory frequently, is there any alternative available?
It’s not. Here in Europe we’re all very frustrated with the situation. It’s just crazy that our most trusted ally has gone bat-shit crazy.
>You can’t win in a conflict under MAD against an opponent who has more at stake than you.

That's purely a psychological trick, if you take this as true then it would be rational for everyone to place madmen in the negotiating seat. A better example, if I had Trump say to China, if you don't open up your markets and drop your tariffs on us, we will nuke you. If I can guarantee as thought exercise that Trump will fire nukes if demands are not met (and that's not difficult to do in reality), do you think Xi Jingping will concede here?
The other factor you are missing in your analysis of PE route is the number of musical chairs are limited. There can only be 1 taylor swift not millions. So the choice is not for everyone. Even if everyone made that choice, a million taylor swifts will not happen. Surviorship bias is real.
Poland is the most pro-US country in Europe. They spend a large portion of their GDP on defense and are staunchly anti-russian because of centuries of bad interactions.

In any reasonable world, US and Poland would be greatest allies. If there is any good sign that the giant is losing it's position (and does so willingly), this is it. As an european, I hope that all the strong words from European leaders will finally turn into actions and we will take a stronger and more sovereign place in the world.
Actual "tweets"/x-posts:

https://x.com/sikorskiradek/status/1898700362460070080

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1898759859459203457
What I can't get over is the only NATO member to ever invoke article 5 complains about the share of cost... Specially when all the NATO action on the Middle East was nonsense since everyone knew it was Saudi Arabia that did 9/11
Feels like the JavaScript framework wars era all over again. Wondering what will be the prevailing paradigm.
We would love to see Europe develop a military spine for once, I’m excited to see how long it takes before they come crawling back under the wing of the US.
Slightly weird that the logo seems to have copy-pasted the "ravel" part of the Laravel logotype too (the hard-right-angle "r"), just changing the colour to blue.
Wouldn't be surprised if Trump bought shares.
I did not see these posts before I posted similar. I fully believe this is a direction Corporations are pushing.

Almost wonder when spyware will be added and restrictive DRM.
Seems more like trying to find out the most proficient LMM users than anything else. I’ve never done interviews but I imagine I’d be hard pressed to skip candidates solely because they aren’t using LLMs.

Each to their own and maybe their method works out, but it does seem whack.
As of 20:37 Paris time, e-mail is still not accessible, neither from my e-mail client nor from the website. Website error message: "Error 503 Backend fetch failed. Varnish cache server". Per the timeline on Gandi's website, we are now at 19 hours without e-mail.
It’s a great tool, but it’s not a posix compliant grep.
Let me guess, the AI is developed by the ones who benefit the most from tax evasion?
I mean there were already System prompt leaks from grok which showed influence on some topics like Musk and trump. Why would an AI be not manipulated?
> If a company is bleeding revenue, it cannot sustain the overhead of employees. They have to go.

No, they don't. During the dotcom bubble my company gave us 2 choices, layoffs or 20% pay cut. We took the latter. Everyone stayed and we had our pay back to previous levels in a couple years and the company remained profitable.

You can, in fact, treat people as people and still run a company.

> Employees feelings don't matter on a Balance Sheet, Income Statement and Cash Flow Statement.

This is only true of companies of a certain (large) size, when all semblance of employees being people have been abstracted away. In companies of more reasonable sizes you must take employee moral into account or you will lose critical employees which could kill the company.
I'm not totally sure whether you meant the 1975 point as a comparison of democracies today versus 1975 US, or democracies from 1975 compared to the US.

This is anecdotal since I don't have evidence handy, but I've been impressed with Swiss voters that I've met and they have all spoken highly of both their Democratic model and their voters. I don't know all the intricacies of it, but my understanding is that their system pushes any meaningful change to a vote. Its slower and requires more voter engagement, but at least from my experience that has succeeded in building a better informed public.
Have a good day.
What about my of decades worth of snippets, custom commands, templates for all the journals, my bib files, and of course my published works that I borrow pieces from? I should replace that with something nonfree that I have to learn from scratch? Howabout you do you?
There's definitely a "peacetime" / "wartime" divide. There's also an overreliance on pedigree. But above all, it's the pressure of being a public company (which often means losing the founder).

As a new CEO, you have to impress the board and investors without really knowing the company. You probably get two earnings calls - six months at most - to prove yourself. That's nothing, even for a senior dev, let alone an exec. And if you're being brought in, it means the company isn't in great shape - or is at least perceived that way.

You don't have time to really figure out how things work, and even if you did, it's political suicide. The board didn't hire a "looks fine to me" person. They hired a fixer. So, it turns into narrative games and rapid actions with massive tail risks.

I don't think it's a people problem. It's a system problem. Leadership replanting is hard, but it's one of the very few tools in the board's toolbox.
This is a sign of a rapid decline of the US in the world stage, faster than I expected a year ago.

A new world order is being established and the US wouldn't be a leader in that world.
That's how it works in my company too. The recruitment teams barely work with the engineering teams themselves. You may know a very good fit for the team, possibly even a previous member/intern of that team, and you won't be sure you can put the person into the recruitment loop. And then they'll need to pass the interviews...
You can go down to the Table 2 of the study you linked and see that's pretty much exactly the data they got (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3805807/table/T2/)

Going from 7.8 to 7 hours and taking 50 instead of 20 minutes to fall asleep is significant for the purposes of this study, but that's not what insomniacs and anxiety patients talk about. Insomniacs who lie awake until 4 in the morning and get 3 hours of sleep routinely because they're so worried by the cup of coffee they had or the supplement they forgot don't do so because they have a physiological reaction to some caffeine, it's a mental problem.
Your framework name suggests that you have an effective method of taking an existing agent that is "close" to meeting requirements by some similarity metric and evolving a new agent that will be better suited than the base agent is to meet the requirements.

If this is true, your post, your repo README file, and your BeeAI Community call presentation (which starts here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-xqQBv-ccY&t=1294s) ought to be proclaiming such a notable success. Yet, I've seen little to nothing about it in any of those places. Am I missing it?

How exactly does your agent evolution process work?
What’s actually happened is that activist investors have bought their way onto the boards of highly profitable companies with insufficient poison pills and made them fire some percentage of workers under the guise of making the stock price go up.

Does worker happiness matter at all, or is it OK to have a net miserable company where the bottom line is slightly higher profit than it would otherwise have been if the environment were a pleasant place to work? Because that’s the tradeoff here; rabid billionaire investors are unhappy because numbers aren’t as high as they could be.
The people providing science funding ought to be interested in their money being spent on science. If the methods of a study are not described in sufficient detail as to enable replication, the study is simply not science. Of course, doing science requires more diligence than doing pseudoscience. That's kind of the point.
The relevance would be that Rust coreutils cannot be merged into Linux mainline. Obviously.
This reminds me of Galileo - the U.S. tried everything they could to kill this "European GPS". It is pretty clear today that giving up on it would have been a catastrophic mistake. Europe should not risk make the same mistake with critical infrastructures ever again. It is time for Europe to build.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_(satellite_navigation)
“You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from.”
― Cormac McCarthy, No Country for Old Men
We are allied with lots of non-democracies, including ones that invade their neighbors (like Saudi). That part is irrelevant.
Perhaps relevant to a lot of HN readers - the culture of conference publishing in much of CS (I'm in computer systems myself) seems to result in significantly different dynamics.

Journal papers are single-blind, i.e. the reviewers know the names of the authors and can make decisions based on reputation, so if you publish great (e.g. faked) results once, it becomes progressively easier to do it again.

Reviewing for conference papers is typically double-blind - we don't know the identity of the authors, and although we can try to guess, a couple of studies show we're wrong most of the time. Most papers (65-85% at good conferences) get rejected, so it's easy to flush something that looks fishy. (then again, it's hard to tell the difference between someone playing games with their numbers and someone who just has the typical crappy CS systems understanding of statistics) The addition of artifact evaluation to a lot of conferences provides another avenue to flush out faked results, too.

However conference reviewing is vulnerable to reviewing fraud, since reviewers and authors typically come from the same relatively small community - see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23459978, or just google for the words "computer science reviewing cabal".

Reviewing fraud might not be quite as destructive in the long term, as the papers that get published through such fraud are probably more crappy than faked, and will hopefully not get cited. In addition, when reviewing fraud is uncovered it's much more of an open-and-shut case - a single person can fake data and make it look a lot like good data, but review fraud requires communication between people who are explicitly barred from communicating on that topic.

A lot of it depends on the community, and the size of the community. When you have 1000+ reviewers for a conference things will always get out of hand - I know of someone who got his cat registered as a reviewer for a particular SIG conference that he hated, just to make a point. I assume one could get a lot of fraudulent research published in that particular conference.
I don't see an transition happening at all. There are some rust projects, but they are more like an addition to, not an replacement of the current ecosystem.
If they feel like offering licenses, I bet European companies will appreciate.

Besides they are no longer 100% as you mention.
Exactly. So the company keeps the guy everyone hates after laying off people that get along. The next people to leave the company are the ones disgusted by the move.
This and 1000 times this. It is so absurd: of course it seems ad hoc plausible to treat roughly similar things as if they were the same. However: never do this in this forum, since this is a community is looking a lot into all kinds details, so you will get called out.

But somehow – SOMEHOW – the same people that ask for nuance in everything act as if it would be even remotely plausible that the two most polar opposites of political theory would be basically the same for all important intents and purposes if thought to an end.

It is simply mind-blowing. People looking at something, seeing it is complex, stopping their thinking and just somehow feeling their way to the most empty assessment ever: "probably the same consequencesif you think it to the end". Without even having begun to think their way through it!

But I get it: thinking is nice as long as it is a purely intellectual endeavor but not if any personal moral responsibility is concerned. You might be morally obligated to draw consequences in your behavior – Heaven Forbid!
That may be in part to their 'president for life'. Leaders are not immortal though and transitions between them have seen large and sometimes catastrophic changes. China designed its modern political system to avoid that, only for Xi to undo it and purge younger potential challengers.
There was an exposé about his chef of IT by Krebs. It kinda feels like a missing piece fir what is going on
> I'm not sure how "it can go the other way around too" -- in that case (assigning to a uint8_t local variable), it seems like that particular optimisation is just not being applied.

So the case that you described has 2 layers. The internal std::count_if() layer, which has a 64-bit counter, and the 'return' layer of the count_even_values_v1() function, which has an 8-bit type. In this case, Clang propagates the 8-bit type from the 'return' layer all the way to the inner std::count_if() layer, which effectively means that you're requesting an 8-bit counter, and thus Clang generates the efficient vectorization.

However, say that you have the following 3 layers: (1) internal std::count_if() layer with a 64-bit counter; (2) local 8-bit variable layer, to which the std::count_if() result gets assigned; (3) 'return' layer with a 64-bit type. In this case the 64-bit type from layer 3 gets propagated to the inner std::count_if() layer, which will lead to a poor vectorization. Demo: https://godbolt.org/z/Eo13WKrK4 . So this downwards type-propagation from the outmost layer into the innermost layer doesn't guarantee optimality. In this case, the optimal propagation would've been from layer 2 down to layer 1 and up to layer 3.

Note: I'm not familiar with how the LLVM optimization pass does this exactly, so take this with a huge grain of salt. Perhaps it does indeed 'propagate' the outmost type to the innermost layer. Or perhaps the mere fact that there are more than 2 layers makes the optimization pass not happen at all. Either way, the end result is that the vectorization is poor.