skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, you can use `--loc="12.34,56.78"` where the values are longitude and latitude.

You can also override the Timezone with `--timezone` (passing an IANA timezone e.g. America/New_York).
I'm not a robot expert, but I do know the answer is simply safety. Once it learns what to do, it can do it faster and faster, but when something goes very wrong, it will go very wrong.
I was at the SCaLE22x linux expo in Pasadena last week and there was a company Replit that has a tool where you type the website you like and it was pretty decent. They said someone came by and in a prompt alone created a GPDR compliant cookie popup. It's another tool, it wasn't perfect, but okay for some one-off sites. It will require skills to direct and know what you want, just like always. Embrace the power, know the limits. Let the new skills enabled by the new tools empower you, reject vendor lock-in to keep yourself free to ply your trade. Just like last time around.
I suspect you probably don't understand it after that. You think you do.

I thought I understood calculus until I realised I didn't. And that took a bit thwack in the face really. I could use it but I didn't understand it.
This is really cool, congratulations!
No matter how well documented system us, how helpful error message is or how good self diagnostics are - some humans will act dumb. Access to knowledge (I assume by embedded you mean better access) is clearly not enough.
The US makes 5 commercial ships per year. China makes 1,700.

https://www.seatrade-maritime.com/containers/us-wakes-up-to-...
That's one of the bonus I was thinking about. It's nice if you have a subset of deps you want to share, or if one dep is actually part of the monorepo, but it does require more to know.
> Retired neurosurgical anesthesiologist here.

Have things changed over time?

> In-hospital arrests are almost universally fatal.

IHCA stats:
"During the pre-surge period, 24.2% survived to discharge in 2020 vs. 24.7% in 2015–2019"

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8852282/#:~:text=Du...

"There are more than 356,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) annually in the U.S., nearly 90% of them fatal. "

https://www.sca-aware.org/about-sudden-cardiac-arrest/latest...

AEDs have greatly improved this (though this study is the highest I've seen - PAD is public access defibrillator):

"The overall survival to hospital discharge after OHCA treated with PAD showed a median survival of 40.0% (range, 9.1–83.3)."

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.117.0...

Even 90% for OHCA is far from universally fatal.

For IHCA, cath labs have greatly improved things, and we're now living in a world where ECPR is becoming increasingly common.
https://www.ft.com/content/69f582a6-3cec-4858-b115-3a2432910...

> China, the world’s largest steelmaker and exporter, warned it would “take all necessary measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests” but did not immediately announce retaliatory tariffs.
Linux/UNIX distributions are essentially C development environments, and their package managers are basically C language package managers… so, you needn’t do everything yourself, just grab the source packages.
I wonder if it could be linked to the original development on the Sega Saturn, if I remember well the video of the prototype, Shenmue on Saturn was spanning across both Shenmue 1 and 2
Isn't every new mobile standard effectively a complete redesign of the core network anyway?

Sure, it'll take decades to be fully rolled out, but that's true for every large-scale change. The real problem is that it's not in the interest of stakeholders to have end-to-end security.
Years go by, but I always find myself getting back to this article, it's just the true essence of systems programming.
I probably made the puzzle harder than it needed to be...

I fixed the sp error in the utility room.
I visited the Mucha museum in Prague and was surprised by how many of his works were advertising posters. On one hand, I don't care for advertising: on the other hand, it brought us these wonderful works that we admire a century on, divorced from their original context, so I can't really deny their artistic potential.
I switched from Sway to River and have been very happy. However, I noticed Niri when it came out, and was extremely intrigued. Haven't check back in since, but it looks like the project is still humming along, which is awesome. I may have to check it out.
I tested the full fp16 gguf
These demos are getting tiring. Who in the robotics space is working on soft/truly-agile hands that can grasp an egg with its "eyes" closed?
oops, errrm, I was referring to kids in the household. just claryfyin'
Google has been looking for post-ad post-search revenue for almost a decade now. They certainly won't dominate forever and have several signals flashing red for a few years now.
Repeatedly? As in you would come back and tell whoever you're with "I gave up"? Like I can understand wanting to ask for e.g. "where do you keep the coffee", but if that wasn't possible -- say the host is asleep, and I'm there taking care of them -- I would certainly be able to figure it out. Just open cabinets and peek / carefully rummage around until you find what you need.
Oh, sure!

I'm not saying that you're wrong, by the way (and I don't think we disagree on the fundamentals you're talking about). I'm just expressing what it is about the 1:1 format specifically that makes me dislike them.

For perspective, I have a weekly meeting with my manager where we touch base to discuss team direction and whatnot (I'm the lead of my team). That's not in a 1:1 format at all and isn't about me, my professional development, any of that.

However, those meetings result in most of the benefits that you're talking about nonetheless and work for me precisely because they're not about me.

My point is that the 1:1 format itself is not one that works well for everyone. If you're the sort of personality that doesn't mesh with the whole 1:1 thing, then 1:1s are just things you have to do because the company requires them.

You could argue that our weekly meetings are, in fact, 1:1s in disguise. I wouldn't say that you're wrong, even though the focus is a bit different. But they are very useful to me because of that, where I find it extremely difficult to find value in actual 1:1s.
if it improves over the dreadful Baki scanlations.... shudder
Vibe-gamedev: a tool for AI vibecoding with Unity
> Tan left Intel's board last year over disagreements on how to turn around the company. He felt Intel had too many layers of middle management

Good sign.
15 year Python dev who usually adopts tooling slowly. Just do it, uv's absolutely worth it.

I also use mise with it, which is a great combination and gives you automatic venv activation among other things.

See, among other mise docs related to Python, https://mise.jdx.dev/mise-cookbook/python.html

See also a Python project template I maintain built on mise + uv: https://github.com/level12/coppy
Good to know! I guess I had the wrong impression of the scene.

I have always had huge respect for both manga and anime translation groups.
If a social media platform blocks an account that publishes a list of names in federal positions that draw a lot of hostility, like IRS agents, I'd be at least sympathetic if not supportive. This has the same kind of ethical ambiguity. If your line between accountability and security is sharp then your world is more monochrome than mine.
Show HN: Open-Source API-Based Engine to Easily Orchestrate AI Agents
I built LX Engine to scratch my own itch when orchestrating multiple AI agents without constantly rewriting boilerplate code. It's an open-source execution engine that lets you define your entire AI workflow in a single JSON object—no more tedious manual pipeline setups. Just pass your agent pipeline as an input, and the engine handles orchestration automatically, returning either detailed step-by-step results or just the final output. It also comes with 20+ built-in agents (web retrieval, PDF creation, local embeddings, sandboxed code execution, etc.) accessible individually through dedicated endpoints. Still early days, feedback very welcome!
Remember, code is written for humans. It is not so much a technical limitation as it is a social limitation. Working in a codebase that does not adhere to the idioms of a language will quickly become a pain point.

The Go code is not that far off how one would write it even if it were being written from scratch. A C# project littered with static classes is not at all how one would write it from scratch.
These MSPM0 chips are so cheap that they are starting to displace bespoke chips for things like EEPROM/ADC/DAC/etc.

The PocketBeagle 2, for example, uses an MSPM0 chip for both ADC as well as EEPROM emulation.
Hospital, Hairdressers, Shaun, Sleepytime... and the list goes on. Seems to me that Bandit is always on the receiving end.

And then there is the Backpackers episode where Bingo takes her turn and punches him repeatedly.
What exactly do you mean by "part of the same context"?
Do you remember how accurately you were able to measure the gravitational constant?
But do you object to ads in general?

If so: how do you think people will find out about new things? Even, like, a new movie or productivity product?
Ah, I'm thinking of my local understanding that many of the Mardi Gras Krewe's have beads and other objects donated to them for tax write-offs for businesses, or they get the whole float sponsored, etc.

>tax revenue generated by the production and sale of those "pollutants."

The other local problem being from 1985 to 2024 Mardi Gras beads were sale tax exempt, but we've somewhat closed that loophole to more specific circumstances.[1]

[1]https://casetext.com/regulation/louisiana-administrative-cod...
As long as something is measurable, you can define it, even politically.

"Loud" can be defined as dB, perhaps a distance from the source of the sound or from a neighborhood/business etc. Ex. Any sound you produce much have adequate dampening or distance such that school zones and residential zones do not recieve greater than 75dB from any singular source, nor 90dB from the combination of all sources. Then legally concerts must use different venues, planes must take a more difficult path to avoid the nearby airport neighborhoods, etc. Maybe walls erected next to speedways.

"Big" would probably need greater specification. One that already exists is lane width, so you can base things off that. Ex. Single-axle vehicles may not have a height greater than its width, where width is measured as the distance between lugnuts in the tightened position of the left and right wheels, the greater distance if the front and back wheels are at different distances.
Thanks for playing! No immediate plans to paywall the game, but we do eventually want to make money from it in some capacity.

---

Edit: dang suggested we should add more about the link to our startup, so here's more if anyone's interested:

Originally, we were making an AI video creator tool with a focus on character consistency in long videos (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39853474). A year ago, character consistency was a big problem and we developed a solution for it in AI videos. Now though, a lot of other AI video creator tools have come out, and 1) character consistency has been solved in other ways 2) the other tools just make better quality videos than ours.

So we decided to pivot from building video creator tools to building apps with AI video as the core format. When I say that we plan to sell apps like Time Portal, it's still pretty open ended. First, we just want to build an app/apps that people really like using for free and figure out the best way to monetize them later. Time Portal is not for sale right now. It's free to play on the web and there is a free app in the App Store.
I had the same idea as an "over the weekend" project. I had the sprites moving (with each invader's "arms" animated while the grid moved) and could control the player. Clearly the "over the weekend" was too ambitious, and I stopped before ever trying to add fire/bullets/collision/etc. So I essentially got no where, but effectively killed the weekend while spending $0 while avoided doing other things that would have definitely cost >$0.

So congrats on sticking to it to complete yours
I’ll never understand how any UI projects don’t include an actual screenshot of their project as the first thing on their landing page. It seems so obvious.
From university, I vaguely recall that, I had to implement a lot of feedback and correction calculations when working on industrial robotic arms. Usually too much speed causes overshooting(going the wrong trajectory or away from target). The feedback is constantly adjusted until the target is reached, hence a lot of expensive computation and readjustment from all the sensor feeds. Additionally, faster movement also has risk of damaging nearby objects when overshoot happens and also harms/degrades the joints faster. For a simpler example, think about the elevator, what would happen if it were to go up/down very fast, how would you tweak your PID controller to handle super fast movement to not throw your passengers when you need to correctly align and halt at the target floor….
You can see when it's using its Python interpreter.
In 2018 the idea behind the red state tariffs was targeting republican senators and representatives. It seem to have worked.

I don't know now how that will work in the era of an authoritarian White House.
At least they're now only botching protocols instead of self-rolling low-level primitives like block and stream ciphers...
The thing about tariff wars is that you never want to shoot your full quiver in the first encounter, but keep some arrows for the next one. And the one after that.

I wouldn’t be so disappointed just yet; even the most lethargic beaurocrats in the EU know what’s going on. This ship is slow to steer, but if she gets moving, she’s hard to stop. Just wait!
Remaking Our Company for the Future: A message from Lip-Bu Tan, who has been named Intel CEO, to company employees.

https://newsroom.intel.com/corporate/lip-bu-tan-remaking-our...
> "I build separate, small HTML pages for each “interaction” I want, then I let CSS transitions take over and I get something that feels better than its JS counterpart for way less work."

I'm not understanding how you are achieving the css transitions between what look like new page loads under the hood...Can you elaborate on how that works?
Ok, but do they know who Lan Di is?
The main problem with Google anti competition is how chrome is being leveraged to mine user behavior signals for search engine algos. That is the unfair advantage that needs to be killed off
The carrot isn't necessarily stress because you do it because you want to, not because you have to. Without shortish term goals work is often just a chore you do to survive and so your parents don't nag you. Maybe so you can own a house by the time your entire life has elapsed one more time in the wage cage.

Edit: Missed the status symbol itself being stressful. I don't think so. There's a lot of pride in just your status moving up. You get a 90s 7 series, you're happy as hell because it's yours. Moved from daddy's money to self sufficient. Your first car. Then you get a nice 00s 5 series, we moving up in the world. Then you get an old Jag as a weekend thing, oh shit, we getting fancy. It just gives you a pleasant feedback loop every year to couple years.
From Educator to Data Storyteller: Using Python to Find Student Success Factors
Writing code in C is very unpleasant, verbose and repetative. For example, if I want to have a structure in C and have a way to print its contents, or free its memory and memory of nested structures, or clone it recursively, it is very difficult to make automatically. I found only two options: either write complicated macros to define the structure and functions (feels like writing a C++ compiler from scratch), or define structure in Python and generate the C code from it.

I looked at C++, but it seems that despite being more feature-rich, it also cannot auto-generate functions/methods for working with structures?

Also returning errors with dynamically allocated strings (and freeing them) makes functions bloated.

Also Gnome infrastructure (GObject, GTK and friends) requires writing so much code that I feel sorry for people writing Gnome.

Also, how do you install dependencies in C? How do you lock a specific version (or range of versions) of a dependency with specific build options, for example?
Since it's underlining code you wrote, it must be "found" that is highlighted, not "expected". Much like up and down, gravity exists to ground all of us in the same direction.
> Time to think bigger.

Ehh, no need - just let the LLM figure out what to build in your garage.
None of those things feature in any problem I deal with on a daily basis, whatever language I use.

So for example today I dealt with a synchronization issue. This turned out to not be a code bug but a human misunderstanding of a protocol specification saga, which was not possible to code into a type system of any sort. The day before was a constraint network specification error. In both cases the code was entirely irrelevant to the problem.

Literally all I deal with are human problems.

My point is Rust doesn't help with these at all, however clever you get. It is no different to C, but C will give you a superset of vulnerabilities on top of that.

Fundamentally Rust solves no problems I have. Because the problems that matter are human ones. We are too obsessed with the microscopic problems of programming languages and type systems and not concentrating on making quality software which is far more than just "Rust makes all my problems go away" because it doesn't. It kills a small class of problems which aren't relevant to a lot of domains.

(incidentally the problems above are implemented in a subset of c++)
The Galene videoconferencing system <https://galene.org> includes peer-to-peer file transfer. The web client is built in, but there's also a command-line client at <https://github.com/jech/galene-file-transfer>.
Yes, rip out all the advanced coding skills and simply do it the way it was originally intended.

I have a single php file with a textarea. It creates pages or updates them. The textarea only displays the article. Everything above and below is removed and added again. When publishing it adds the article to the index.html archive-2025.html and tagname.html pages. I haven't bothered automating removal. If it ever happens I'll do it by hand.

The search engine is a bit odd, it is a 26x26 list of raw files named aa.html ab.html each bit in those refers to an article. If you type foobar it loads fo oo ob ba and ar.html then performs and AND on the files. What html's remain are loaded and searched for foobar.

I should really store everything in a db in stead. (Just for searching)

Edit: near zero maintenance over two decades. One instance where the host upgraded php and the editor stopped working but the website worked just fine so it doesn't really count.
It isn't. I mean, that depends on what "low level code" means. We have compilers so, to an extent, it's something desirable. But if "low level code" means everything we understand as code today, it may not be great. Human languages aren't precise enough for the kind of work that needs to be done.

But let's say it's accomplished. What will end up happening is that AI (should it work to the extent it's been hyper) will replace all the 'fun' jobs and we'll be left with either no jobs (and no income), or the most menial physical labor imaginable.
I would think that tape would be better for archival storage. My experience has been that the writeable optical media does not hold up well long term.
When AI Spits Your Own Shitty Code Back at You
It's also on Xbox via Rare Replay. And you get to keep it.
CGNAT is increasingly common for large ISPs as IPv4 gets expensive.

There are entire regions of brazil where all residential internet is CGNAT'ed, making any video calls between those users symmetric NAT.
I would confirm the ick with my euro perspective.

It’s a pattern I’ve noticed with Americans, this bundling up art with the capitalism. Commercial/Ad work can be a lot of fun and a good living for any artist, but it’s just not fucking art. It’s such a cringey pattern - that somehow makes commercial work into chivalrous patronage.

That being said - cool ad! Fun to make and probably good money! Would love to work on something like that! But. Not. Art.
I highly, highly recommend uv. It solves & installs dependencies incredibly fast, and the CLI is very intuitive once you've memorized a couple commands. It handles monorepos well with the "workspaces" concept, it can replace pipx with "uv tool install," handle building & publishing, and the docker image is great, you just add a FROM line to the top and copy the bin from /uv.

I've used 'em all, pip + virtualenv, conda (and all its variants), Poetry, PDM (my personal favorite before switching to uv). Uv handles everything I need in a way that makes it so I don't have to reach for other tools, or really even think about what uv is doing. It just works, and it works great.

I even use it for small scripts. You can run "uv init --script <script_name.py>" and then "uv add package1 package2 package3 --script <script_name.py>". This adds an oddly formatted comment to the top of the script and instructs uv which packages to install when you run it. The first time you run "uv run <script_name.py>," uv installs everything you need and executes the script. Subsequent executions use the cached dependencies so it starts immediately.

If you're going to ask me to pitch you on why it's better than your current preference, I'm not going to do that. Uv is very easy to install & test, I really recommend giving it a try on your next script or pet project!
It's disappointing to see yet another setback befall these Mercedes and BMW buyers. Do they expect fine individuals like that to drive around in Audis, like an animal?
Mahmoud Khalil's Detention Is a Trial Run
> We can't do that, however, because Prolog doesn't support unification of functors. We could patch that if we started referring to function application with more elaborate syntax by parsing "sin(exp(x))" as application(sin, application(exp, x)) so that we could unify on sin, but this quickly obscures the syntax tree and removes the delightfully direct nature of DCGs.

Would the =../2 predicate help? It allows for you to unify functors without wrapping them in something like your application(exp, x) example. Not sure how it would interact with DCGs, though - never took more than a superficial glance at them.
I used to install Python through mise but now I just use uv tbh.
His talk at Monitorama was great-- one of the most entertaining talks around!