skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Three thoughts.

1) To be slightly annoyingly contrarian, there is money to be made in secure telecom; Skype founders made a bundle, no?

2) This article conflates freeswitch with major telecom carrier infeastructure. My impression is that 30+% of the problem with security is not technical but economic. Carriers outsource a ton of their operations, effectively outsourcing most efforts to care about security... which never helps security posture unless the outsourcer considers their core value proposition, which they generally don't, instead pushing themselves as a cost/capitalization play.

3) No discussion of Matrix here as where things are headed, security-wise? https://matrix.org/blog/2024/10/29/matrix-2.0-is-here/
Hey,
You know that feeling when you spend two hours checking IMDb reviews, comparing genres, stalking actors' filmographies... only to end up watching nothing?

Turns out more options = harder decisions.

Here's my fix: MoodieMovie - it picks movies based on your current vibe instead of generic rankings.

How it works:
1/ AI Mood Match
ChatGPT analyzes your emotional state (sleepy/hyped/romantic/etc.) → recommends 5 tailored genres.
Example: Feeling drained? Get "uplifting comedies" or "adrenaline-pumping action".

2/ Elite-Only Library
• Curated from IMDb Top250 + hidden gems
• Every film AI-tagged with emotional vibes and key scenes
• Auto-rejects anything below 6.7 rating

3/ Mood Exploration (New!)
Discover movies through dynamic tag clouds instead of boring lists.
Try: "Whimsical nostalgia" → finds indie coming-of-age films you'd never search yourself.

If you're tired of decision fatigue, give MoodieMovie one shot: moodiemovie.top
Saves 78% browsing time. 97% users say it's "scarily accurate".

Your perfect movie night starts here. No trailers needed.
I'd wish people stop using "open sourcing" when speaking about models.

Open sourcing is about being able to change and replicate builds, they make the models "freely available" but the recipe on how they are made is kept secret.

It's akin to being able to download Windows shareware executables and calling that "open source" when nothing related to how the executables are build is available.
So this is a journey where starting in ruby, going through an SICP phase, and then eventually compromising that it isn't viable. it kinda seems like C is just the personal compromise of trying to maintain nerdiness rather than any specific performance needs.

I think it's a pretty normal pattern I've seen (and been though) of learning-oriented development rather than thoughtful engineering.

But personally, AI coding has pushed me full circle back to ruby. Who wants to mentally interpret generated C code which could have optimisations and could also have fancy looking bugs. Why would anyone want to try disambiguating those when they could just read ruby like English?
The Essential Guide to Food Safe 3D Printing: Regulations Technologies Materials
What’s tragic is this is completely self-inflicted and you could argue is done against the kind of code structure that is more idiomatic to C#. Luckily, you don’t have to do it if you are not already working with this type of codebase.
What are your issues with the matplotlib API more specifically?
I don't know if automotive is that resource and money constrained. People will spend tens of thousands on upgrades if they see the value, and there's plenty of space in there to put a powerful GPU cluster. But of course reliability constraints will be stricter
> This makes no sense unless you read it as the Trump administration sabotaging US interests.

Occam's razor - they are all morons.
Not at all. Mozilla is now controlled by hyper partisan political operatives. There should be zero intersection between partisan politics and my web browser.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubtWZwtJCdw
Eng leadership at my place are pushing Cursor pretty hard. It's great for banging out small tickets and improving the product incrementally kaizen-style, but it falls down with anything heavy.

I think it's weakening junior engineers' reasoning and coding abilities as they become reliant on it without having lived for long, or at all, in the before times. I think may be doing the same to me too.

Personally, and quietly, I have a major concern about the conflict of interest of Cursor deciding which files to add to context then charging you for the size of the context.

As with so many products, it's cheap to start with, you become dependent on it, then one day it's not cheap and you're fucked.
cape.co marketing sounds suspiciously like the cia front in Switzerland in the late 90s.

"hey you who needs privacy, here's something that somehow costs even less than the ones selling your data"
Cline is much better
Western democracies have resigned themselves, perhaps by design, to leaving the poor vulnerable to criminals. I have no idea why this is, maybe sadism. Forcing the vulnerable to live a life where they have to worry for their personal security and for the security of their property is something these democracies will fight tooth and nail for. And that’s also their most successful cultural export, perhaps after Coca Cola.
This is the earliest HN post available online:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2
Just found the BEST podcast for entrepreneurs and hustlers
When we’ve solved the access to explicit content in the rest of the internet wr can come back and have this conversation. Until then teenagers will just go to Reddit or wherever and get it there. If we ban that it’ll just move to sexting on Snapchat which if you have ever spent any time with parents of teenagers you’ll know has a tendency to be screenshotted and distributed.

So you’re arguing for teenagers to be encouraged to share explicit content of minors with each other?
Maybe that's the Trump plan?

1. Launch TRUMP and MELANIA cryptocurrencies to get a few hundred millions of dollars of cash. (and possibly also get some cash from the "First Buddy" Elon Musk)

2. Announce tariffs, and in general cause chaos, crashing the stock market.

3. Buy the dip.

4. Revoke all tariffs.

5. Profit.
Ok, but have you tried Gemma3?
If that's the goal, one might wonder why are tariffs implemented in such a static way. Why not having your own tariffs importing from XYZ be updated on a monthly basis based on what XYZ imported from you last month.
A “step out” is a single flag passed to “dotnet publish” or set in the project manifest.
So this was vulnerable ?
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/explore/global-infrastruct...
That would seriously undermine the existence of the EU as a whole. Bear in mind, it justifies the very steep membership fees (for the countries that have high enough GDP to pay) by tying membership to free trade. The EU keeps quite high external tariffs on a lot of things, especially in order to protect French agriculture. Thus the primary argument Remainers presented for staying in the EU was that if Britain left the EU would levy new trade barriers and tariffs on its exports.

The EU has many members who are in it primarily for the transactional benefits. If the EU eliminated external tariffs not only would the French be out on the streets again immediately, but one of the primary motivations for membership would evaporate and the EU would lose a lot of leverage over member states.
The US trade more with the EU (both exports and imports) than with China, and it is fairly balanced. So actually this is the trade war nobody wants.

On the other hand the US import a lot from China but export much less so they can hurt China more (but balanced with the fact that this would probably hurt US consumers more as well). Hence we've seen that the Chinese response to Trump has been minimal.
It’s not a recent trend. It’s how things have been and are.

My best explanation is that it’s a holdover from when print space was limited, so articles simply don’t show and only tell. When they do add a picture in print, it’s usually to grab attention or signal that this is an important article.
Can you name the top three reasons why Go or Rust would be better for this?
> How about a 100% tariff on Office 365, Windows, AWS, Azure, etc?

+ Apple products, + google (& their ads), + Facebook (& their ads), + Netflix, + all Hollywood film and television output.

Funnily enough all the money everyone outside the US spends on these things is not included in the "trade deficit" that is "the problem".
True. Sorry, I thought that was implied!
Great insights on how default settings shape user behavior. I think this discussion also hints at a broader issue: even open platforms can face restrictions, whether by design or external forces. In environments where access is limited—be it due to institutional policies or government regulations—having a reliable workaround becomes crucial. I've personally found that using a robust residential proxy service like NodeMaven can make a big difference. Their proxies offer secure, unrestricted access, ensuring you can connect to the full spectrum of online resources without hassle. If you ever hit a roadblock, it’s definitely worth checking out NodeMaven’s service https://nodemaven.com/proxies/residential-proxies/.
The issues these countries have are largely self-imposed. For example, China's struggles with international trade have a lot to do with their capital controls.

Small countries would probably have an easier time of it because they can just trade however they like without having to mollify their own bureaucrats. The traders will figure it out. The threat of US intervention is real, but I wouldn't be certain about whether it gets more or less pressing for smaller countries. The US probably won't even notice what they are doing if they keep quiet enough. Oil trading would be a different story though.
This may put me and my peers out of work (in a good way). SRE is a consequence of this function being lost, IMO. Pattern: developers don't like it? Give it to Ops/SRE.

Take away the escape, we will all be better for it.
Good job Google. It is kinda hilarious that 'open'AI seems to be the big player least likely to release any of their models.
Aren't we already living in the Biff got rich timeline?
Neither Go nor Rust have a GUI toolkit anywhere close to the capabilities of JavaFX, so in practice such an app would largely be written in JavaScript. If you want to use one language for your desktop app, be portable, and avoid the complexities that come with web development, Java is the best possible choice today (arguably the only choice other than maybe Qt).
When done right, "chasing fads" can be a means towards delivering value to shareholders.
Digital signs and apps are what they're pushing on us now. There are already restaurants that don't have any kind of printed/posted menu at all and you're expected to use your phone to scan a QR code. There's no telling if the prices shown to you on your device are the same as what the person behind you in line will see.

There are also already restaurants that have different prices when you use their app which helps condition you to accept that prices will differ from person to person or even day to day.

You're right that people don't care for discriminatory pricing though. People's objection to the practice is the only thing that's been keeping it from being more widely used already (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41272-019-00224-3)

They stand to make money hand over fist from it though so we're going to see company after company testing it, pushing the boundaries of what we'll accept and normalizing the practice. Without regulations making discriminatory pricing illegal in certain settings, it's basically inevitable that we'll see it more often.
Just use Cline, it beats Cursor hollow — saves me like hours per day
Yeah, I find that confusing too. Recently I heard in a YT video with a cardiologist (Medlife Crisis) that some people in the US lived more than 4 years with an artificial heart.

The article calls it the "world’s first implantable rotary blood pump that can act as a complete replacement for a human heart", so maybe there's a difference but the article is written as if this was the first artificial heart ever which it clearly isn't.
I prefer not to buy any US goods when not absolutely necessary. No need to support a country that wants annex a EU country.
> that will affect only future developments.

There's a term for that: Embrace-Extend-Extinguish
1) Because the purpose is not really to make money from tariffs (only trump think that is a thing). The purpose is to encourage people to buy replacements from other countries/your own country/union. People arent going to switch from AWS to Hetzner just because a temporary tariff. But they could easily buy steel/corn/etc from another place while tariffs are in place

2)Software is very hard to tariff because often you can set up a company inside the other country and sell the software from there. And then it never crosses the border. Same can't be done with beef. It has to cross a border.
I have been on a similar journey. The Bose headphones are nice, but hard to sleep with and they are ON-ear, which hirt my ears after an hour or so. The Bose Sleepbuds are okish, the best of all the products I tried, sadly discontinued. There was(is?) a reboot of the same product but do not have experience with those [0]. Anyone tried those ‘soft’ headband looking headphones for sleeping? Tips welcome

[0] https://ozlosleep.com/
Everyone is a temporarily embarrassed millionaire. That's why they are voting like they are millionaires.

Humans are not good a thinking.
My goto was basically: "I want to do <x>. What do you think?" (but a bit more diplomatically phrased)

Some examples:

- Change the way standups are done
- Do something not directly related to the team
- Do debt
- Change / take over the way a project is being done

In general it worked well because either I had a good idea in which case I'd often get the agency to do it, or perhaps not directly but a path towards it or it wasn't and I learnt something.
Euro to start with, it's quite stable (and even appreciates against the dollar).

Depending on risk profile, desire for diversification and acceptance of variability, swiss francs, british pounds, chinese yuan, indian rupee, japanese yen, south korean won, etc. can also be used.
This is why I'm not particularly worried about working remote/WFH from the US. I've heard the scare tactic that "your manager will move your job overseas for cheaper!" - but inevitably most companies have no idea how to do that successfully without running into issues like the article. It's just easier for them to deal with and verify US (or Canadian) employees.

I guess at some point AI deepfakes will get so good that they look, sound, and act like a local dev while zooming and working with them throughout the day - but then I suppose what's the problem exactly?, ha.
Except complexity of language
That still does not make sense.

Do you block your own citizens from accessing sites hosted in foreign countries if those sites/companies don’t comply with your foreign law?

Do you arrest your citizens for accessing those sites anyways or use VPNs to circumvent blocking?

And there are dozens of other questions that raises, but you’re talking about what most people describe as totalitarian states.
When your model is that he is a decapitation strike (https://archive.is/1xkxK) against the US, everything makes perfect sense.

Blockcades are an act of war. They are strategically useful to disable a foreign military through robbing it of supplies it needs.

These tariffs are having a blockade like effect by cutting off trade. Does it matter that much whether trading is ceased due to foreign ships blocking trade routes or a foreign backed coup making us do it to ourselves "willingly?"

Our military is absolutely failing to live up to their oath to defend us against enemies foreign and domestic.
> Sadly, .NET, Java, Javascript and Python can't even come close to the power of that ability to catch an exception, modify the object and continue execution.

Is that...On Error Resume Next? :D
> then mention the car is compatible with third-party self-driving products like Comma.ai

What's in it for the sales person or the dealership?
So be creative and ask it to make something that isn't a Todo app with thousands examples on github. Knowing that it's really really really advanced autocomplete based on matrix math that does have some funny edge cases because of a numbering subreddit is an interesting degenerate case, but the sheer vastness of the training data it has picked up makes it able to dig into a simultaneously deep and shallow Lego box. it does fall over and go in circles, and having learned to program before the Internet was mainstream, I'm able to go into the code a fix it manually, doesn't impeach it's ability to get that far in the first place.

if it's only able to do the first 90% of the work, and I have to do the last 90% of the work, it's still saved me from doing that first 90% of the work.
I published my proof-of-concept here: https://gist.github.com/rossant/517806ea551f4038fd412c23c3d6...
Yes, that is missing. I thought about creating something like that, but it's a lot of work.
Also, the huge number of source generators have a problem: a SG cannot see code generated by a another sg. There is no ability to stack them. That will be a problem as more and more sg's generate source. E.g. I have a SG which creates interfaces. No other sg can use these interfaces.
Maybe they will find out you don’t need $555M a year to make a web browser. First good step would be to fire that useless CEO.
Have a second thought before following all these suggestions.

> Ask the candidate to do things that AI filters cannot handle – yet, such as:

> * A face turning side to side

With all AI ethical practices being set by unscrupulous people right now, and a gold rush of everyone else ... is an "employer" asking me to do this actually just trying to get a model to impersonate me?

Or it it an actual company, but they want training data for their AI snake oil?

Or is it a legitimate company who are being honest, but the video service they're using is going to abuse that video data (whether or not the ToU permits that, because legal isn't stopping anyone in this gold rush)?

> * standing up and walking backward from the camera, showing more body detail

> In the circumstances, It should be justifiable to run through some or all of these tests, as well as asking for all filters to be turned off.

If we stop and ask ourselves, "What would an HR expert say?"...

Well, the poor professional decorum, and setting a suspicious tone and imbalanced dynamic, the HR person might not complain about, but...

What I think think they might complain about first is us setting up the company for discrimination lawsuits and public outrage:

* What if your request comes off as sexually objectifying and/or discriminating on their basis of their physique? (Basically, "Now how about you walk back and give us a little twirl, cupcake?" or "Bro, do you even lift?")

* What if the person has mobility problems that aren't relevant to the software job?

* What if the person is trans and using filters to help them pass, due to well-known discrimination and abuse?

* What if the person routinely uses filters for a scar or a skin condition they're self-conscious about, and maybe has trauma around that? Or because they have a really unflattering camera on their personal laptop? Are they going to feel humiliated or harassed?

I'm wondering whether some of the suggestions for countermeasures might be considered OK because the scenarios they'd just talked about are of candidates in countries that can be paid a lot less for the same work. And therefore maybe thinking of them as the other or lesser, and not due the same respect we'd hopefully extend to people in our own country or another affluent country?
Around 100%
How can you even tariff multinational companies where nothing is transferred between one country to another. Although I think they could tax the company on moving the money out of country. So e.g. whatever money google got from ads from European country can only be spent in Europe else they face heavy tariff.
The US is a massive meat exporter [0] and has put a lot of energy into getting import deals etc. with partner countries. The most famous one is with Japan, but the EU probably has it's range of agreements.

Taxing US meat is hitting right where it needs to, with very limited impact on he local population. France for instance will just increase it's domestic sales, and other EU countries can also turn to neighbor to get their meat.

Software and electronics are a different beast and a lot more impacting in that regard.

[0] https://www.mda.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/inline-files...
> But personally, AI coding has pushed me full circle back to ruby.

This happened to me too. I’m using Python in a project right now purely because it’s easier for the AI to generate and easier for me to verify. AI coding saves me a lot of time, but the code is such low quality there’s no way I’d ever trust it to generate C.
As a EU citizen I have the complete opposite view, why should we be impacted by lower exports due to American tariffs while still letting their products access our market without repercussions?

Even more, none of the tariffs imposed on the USA will impact your consumption directly, there are alternatives to them and with the price increase you'll naturally choose those alternatives that are cheaper. Nothing being levied a tariff is a product that only the USA exports to the EU.
> Cutting and reintroducing programs has real implications in the short term for those individuals at the receiving end, even if it is ultimately reintroduced in the long term. People have monthly mortgages and have to eat daily.

The same goes for the programs or rules that should be removed. The existing social assistance system has overlapping benefits phase outs that prevent lower income people from making a little more money because they money is then lost to the phase outs. It's a poverty trap.

Likewise, a lot of poorly-crafted regulations destroy jobs and then people can't make ends meet because they're unemployed or had to take a job with lower pay. These people have to eat too.

> It is not a Faustian bargain as there is no such thing as a perfect market in the real world, primarily because of imperfect information.

It isn't expected to be perfect. It's expected to be better than the alternative.

The general problem is that imperfect information applies more to the government trying to make rules for strangers than it does to people who are steeped in the details of their own lives. Nobody has perfect information but people know their own lives better than members of Congress do.

> Your comment on checks and balances is exactly my point, the government cannot willy nilly go in a different direction, the scale of government means there is inertia and displacement that can impact individuals.

The issue is that it goes in both directions. If the inertia is in the wrong direction then there needs to be a way to promptly stop it.

Whereas if the government doesn't prohibit you from doing something which is nominally bad for you, you still have the option to not do it of your own volition. If it's actually not in your interest to do it.

> What point is a market in a democracy if it is cruel and serves only a select set of individuals, a lottery rather than there to improve the human condition.

A lottery is better than the house deciding when to put their finger on the scale.