skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Related: recent interview of Jonathan Blow in which he discusses the status of Jai https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jamU6SQBtxk
who care, corporations are not national, they will discard their host when they find it convenient
Here's a random video I found explaining what deep drawing is (skipped past the intro boilerplate): https://youtu.be/O3Wx1HA3fns?t=35
In another world of reviews... Copilot can now be added as a pr reviewer if a company allows/pays for it. I've started doing it right before adding any of my actual peers. It's only been a week or so and it did catch one small thing for me last week.

This type of llm use feels like spell check except for basic logic. As long as we stuff have people who know what they are doing reviewing stuff AFTER the AI review, I don't see any downsides.
YouTube, when the walls fell [video]
You don't necessarily need the person to be there. My house is never cleaner than after I've been on the phone with a friend. My mind shuts off, my body does all the chores I've been procrastinating, while my friend does her art, and we both catch up on life.

Comparatively, working in a coffee shop does not make me get more work done, I just feel better.
I meant browsing history. I don’t care about my search history. Even though these days I use the paid ChatGPT with the web search tool most of the time. Google is becoming more useless every month
Also known as DSR (Direct Server Return) https://www.haproxy.com/blog/layer-4-load-balancing-direct-s...
> There’s no serfdom anywhere in the world currently.

Tell that to guest workers in Saudi Arabia. Or to people in North Korea.

> There are plenty of monarchies in the world.

There are very few _real_ monarchies where the monarch has absolute power, with hereditary power transfer: Saudi Arabia, Oman, North Korea.
Which is still a workound and sometimes buggy - it overwrites an existing search engine. In my case its google. But when I want to use google, I can’t - I have to switch to another browser or deactivate the kagi addon/plugin.
Unlikely as it seems, does he actually run the company anymore? He's running a bunch of other companies and apparently the federal government. I wonder when is the last time he attended a Tesla meeting. He really should hand the reins. But even so, he's going to the biggest shareholder. Jeff Bezos relinquished Amazon, but he's still executive chair and the biggest stock holder so people still the company his.
As long as you're dreaming, perhaps you should also include giving up all his equity in the company. He'd still profit handsomely off someone else running the company well with over 12% of shares.
The low hanging fruit is to target papers cited in corporate media; NYT, WSJ, WPO, BBC, FT, The Economist, etc. Those papers are planted by politically motivated interlocutors and timed to affect political events like elections or appointments.

Especially those papers cited or promoted by well-known propagandists like Freedman of NYT, Eric Schmidt of Google or anyone on the take of George Soros' grants.
Sold my Tesla model 3 performance about a year ago, and it wasn’t because of politics. Tesla continuously deployed breaking changes to my car without my permission. Autopilot, parking sensors, rain sensing wipers that just became absolute garbage… every new update was an exciting journey through the features of my car that used to work and now didn’t. Couple that with depreciation of a 68,000$ car to 19,000$ in two years time, I will never buy another Tesla. They have no long term thinking, no thoughts about existing customers, they will screw you over to make quarterly sales targets.
I like it, but thanks for the feedback.
Insurance isn't much of a factor for that particular scam. They convince the affluent "worried well" patients to pay out of pocket because most insurers will only authorize an MRI based on specific clinical criteria.
AI weapons will soon make successful revolution quite unlikely.
I've driven several Teslas and all were a terrible experience largely for this reason, basic controls are often absurdly clunky or hard to find. That's nice that they finally fixing some of these mistakes after years of complaints, but I'm very skeptical of a company that so often goes out of its way to create problems in order to be cheap and novel.

I've been hearing for years from Tesla fans about how perfectly amazing the cars are but I doubt they will suddenly be right after yet another redesign.
I wonder how many people have literally been injured or died due to this pursuit for better "design". And it applies not only to touch screen (which is a total madness), but to real buttons as well - those buttons need not only to be physical, but have different form/some tactile differentiation.

What's happening with touch screens is total mess due to car designers trying to circumvent regulations (e.g., can't have that screen in front of a driver, or projected over the windshield) - so they are forced to move it to a side, which makes operating it while driving more dangerous.

But even button's design is falling prey of it, with buttons hidden way below the top of the dashboard, made of the same size, etc. It takes forever to scan & find the right button (e.g. internal air) while driving.

And I don't see it as just some recent trend (although there's much more of it). Even 10-12 years ago, this way already a problem.

One example of stupidity: Toyota Sienna 2013 has brightness control for its media screen (which also shows back up camera) via a touch screen button. Turning brightness at night works ok - but then turning it back on during day light is impossible - nothing is visible on that dimmed screen!! Latest Toyota Sienna has all of the climate control buttons (8?) in 1 row, very low, of the same size, barely visible signs on them - recipe for disaster...

I wish these designers and execs would have their kids life depend on it - I wonder if that'd change their thinking...
The McLaren W1 Can Drive in Two Gears at Once
Any chance of adding mermaid syntax for ANSI or ASCII charts?
The people who commit the harassment and assaults call it a protest in order to shield themselves from the consequences of their actions. Their actions are illegal, and you cannot make them use the correct words, so it’s an illegal protest.
To be more clear, i'm saying it is not undecidable in the sense that mathematicians use the term.
> My question is if Google has to divest from Chrome, would they be able to build a new web browser?

I'm not a lawyer, and didn't read the verdict, but your query is very Hacker News. Justice is not code. If Google is forced to divest from Chrome, it of course means it can't turn around and make the Google Dhrome browser. If Google did, they'd be sued for ignoring the verdict.
I can see a billionaire like Musk wasting some of their net worth to play some stupid political theatre.
Thanks a lot man. I totally missed it lol. Just fixed it.
Maskirovka correctly applied:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_military_deception
I just built it on macos 15.3.1 without issues, if that helps.
Done. Thanks both of you for pointing out my obvious mistake
Sounds like a plus.
Running Linux, I feel similar about Chromium. Despite needing a backup browser for occasional Firefox issues, I won't touch it.

I'm using Midori for this purpose and it quite sucks a bit. I really hope a good alt browser jumps into the repos soon.
okay semantic santa thank you for gifting us this trite side note. the message was clear and makes sense and youre disregarding that to elevate your preferred modus of communication. do you eat the chaff with your wheat?

its almost as if the roles of habit and cultur influence the way that a human brain makes sense of its stimulus.
Different incentives. Lockheed and Northrop make their big bucks on “cost-plus” contracts, which is a euphemism for “paying the company to fail”. SpaceX and Anduril avoid that type of contract
Or runaways.

I do agree with the basic concept, though--kids being snatched by strangers is very rare.
> because this law isn’t about the individual’s health, but about the fetal health.

this is just twisting definitions. The law can't remove the fetus if the person carrying it is abusing drugs (or whatever), so the law applies to the person carrying the fetus. That is a "law that says you can't be unhealthy" and the reason is "because it hurts the fetus".

we also put people that have pica disorder into mental hospitals, because they eat things that are not healthy.
I definitely remember casting pointers to ints and printing them to prove to myself what it was pointing to and what the offset was for the next value e.g. in an array.

In C you can also do those fun array indexing and pointer arithmetic tricks that require you truly understand the concept of "address plus offset" that basically everything uses.

But even if that's a hallucination, Rust does the hard work of keeping pointers off your mind by a combo of refs, box, etc. and Rust is not a good first language, I don't think, for a variety of reasons.

My ultimate programing curriculum if I had to make one would teach you to program in python, then show you C via Cython or similar. Lots of allocation and free under the hood in Python.
Go Note Go, a note-taking app for walking and driving
Ironic this post is written in repetitive SEO spam format.
Unless he sells the company, I doubt it will survive. I wonder when layoffs will start ? That will really make for very interesting headlines.
Have you tested it ? I suggest you test it with multiple screenshots (literal scam text, just a normal conversation (not a scam) and borderline doubtful conversation. The AI is pretty good at identifying them, with a confidence score and risk level.
I don't understand your response as it feels like it is also my point, and something I would say to you? :( If the LLM cannot do basic tasks such as this, what are you going to do? Keep throwing more "tools" at it and hope to start building stuff on top of it? People are trying to get these things to do complex multi-step reasoning tasks, including making changes to their codebase (?!), automating behaviors as "agents" that need to predictably and secure function... but, somehow, as part of the same explanation, it can't even translate API documentation, one of the most trivial code tasks a human does? There are reports that OpenAI is planning to sell "mid-tier agents for software development costing possibly $10,000 a month" (to quote The Information)... and yet, here we are, claiming it isn't up to writing API boilerplate? Help me make this make sense :(.
Again, the simplest model of the world that explains all of Trump’s actions is: he’s a foreign asset.
I think the answer is clear and rather obvious. Require all writing assignments to be written out longhand, and require a high standard of composition, handwriting, spelling and grammar. Pay no attention whatsoever to whether or not the the text is AI-generated.

Even if students do nothing but copy AI output verbatim, the intensive and intimate exposure to adequate writing, and the discipline of producing legible handwriting, would be powerfully educational.

For millennia, students have learned literature and writing skills by copying out long passages from the classics. Teachers now have an opportunity to trick students into doing just that with the bonus of letting the students think they are pulling a fast one.

In the future, teaching students to prompt AIs to produce good writing, and recognize it when they see it, will be functionally indistinguishable from teaching them to be good writers, and would be a vast improvement over the current state of affairs.
I was expecting “insane”.
It’s Safari you’re talking about. All other browsers, even Chrome, support arbitrary default search engines, while Safari doesn’t even support them via extension, requiring ugly redirect hacks. Privacy Pass is similar, with all browsers letting you implement it as an extension, except Safari. The problem is entirely and only Safari.
insane that people actually let elon’s government work influence their car buying decisions
lol maybe i should do that next. Voice based scam identification in real time is the need of the hour
Very helpful, thanks. I came across this site from the FCC for reassigned numbers, but I'm not quite sure how to use it. Is this the right site? www.reassigned.us

Was the Michael Bazzell book you're referring to
"Open Source Intelligence Techniques: Resources for Searching and Analyzing Online Information" or the "OSINT Techniques: Resources for Uncovering Online Information" (both around $44 on Amazon)?
Can’t speak for Venezuela but I know it is fairly common in Argentina to use crypto for currency exchange and a hedge against inflation. Not sure about straight commerce but sure it happens as well.
It was great, am glad it saved a lot of my time. Of course prompts are important but it would surely cut down your overall dev time.
>No, the rebate is paid at point of sale to the purchaser of said vehicle, not to the dealership, and not to Tesla.

https://tc.canada.ca/en/road-transportation/innovative-techn...

=========================================
To get reimbursed:

Log into the ZEV application, select the selling dealership, and go to the “I want to view all iZEV requests submitted for this dealership/authorized seller.” Then search the Service Request ID # of the Eligibility Assessed request and upload the sales/lease agreement and the Incentive Received Form. Make sure that all documents are complete and include all signatures and information required.

[...]

iZEV Online Application: request status

[...]

Rebate Sent

The dealership has been sent a payment, and you'll be notified by email. This email will include the payment amount, the service request ID and the Vehicle Identification Number. Some banks may take up to 5 business days to deposit the funds into your account.

========================================

Straight from the horses mouth; the dealership is reimbursed. The buyer pays a lower out of pocket price. It makes no sense to have the reimbursement go to the owners directly as part of the point of sale. Transport Canada would need have to have electronic payment systems setup for every EV buyer along with all the privacy and financial handling headaches that such a government system entails.

>It's not that much more in price, and it's a much better vehicle than anything Ford or Chevrolet makes.

The Mach E starts at $58,000. The Ioniq 5 at $55,000. The EV6 at $56,000, the Aryia at $52,000, and the ID4 at $44,000.

The Model Y start at $65,000. It's a significant chunk of change even for middle class Canadians.

>Nothing will come up because nothing happened. Consumers went on a buying spree because the rebate was quickly coming to a close.

Maybe, maybe not. There's also ways that I could see this legitimately happening. But at the end of the day it's still highly unusual behaviour that bears further scrutiny. Also known as the being suspicious.
Would look into it. Thanks for the idea.
I recently got a letter from the bank that owns my tesla loan, informing me that I can buy the car at the end of the loan. Previously that wasn't an option. Plus, it was for $28k (at the end of a 3 year loan).

Got another letter trying to get me to buy a new 3 with 0% interest for 60 months.

They're definitely under pressure.
It's from the Windows 95 launch video. https://youtu.be/_JzfROUDsK0?t=263
working fine at my end.
Scam isn't really the right word. It's useful for speculation, fraudsters, technofetishists and for illegal transactions. It does have some more legitimately interesting uses (e.g. escrow) but that's not worth all that much.
The success rate of this is impractically low. APIs are dirty, inconsistent things. Real-world connection to obscure APIs is a matter of hard sleuthing. Docs are wrong, endpoints are broken, auth is a nightmare. These APIs need to be massaged in advance and given a sanity-wrapper if you want any semblance of reliable success when a model calls them.
We are talking multitrillion company here, money shouldn't be an issue. Though you prove my point, they lack coordination. Also AI lacks coordination and strategy and won't solve BigTech management problems any time soon. Best they can try is providing tools trying to capture what others, that are actually inventive, can do. That's why they will stay at Azure level.
I agree that Monarchs are great if they realise their long term legacy is best served by doing very little-to-nothing but still bringing the Prime Minister to account once a week (the A/UK/CA/NZ evolutionary model). However, even the ceremonial power is proving problematic in a world where the government of UK wants King of UK to have Trump for tea and the government of CA wants King of CA to spit in it.
It is used ephemerally to unlock your vaults. It isn't stored anywhere. You're really clutching at straws here.

Given a sample set of passwords derived from a secret heuristic, it could be reversed. The secret heuristic isn't completely safe either. Moreover because it lives in your brain the algorithm is inherently low entropy and the resulting passwords will be as well. Furthermore the old adage applies, don’t roll your own crypto.
How is it better than passkeys?
Cadvision? 3mbps cable (sadly Rogers) wasn't impossible at the time.
Guys, Thanks for the feedback so far, am glad most of you like the service. Thanks for those who found the bug with my api and its fixed now. Would love any other feedback regarding the features and if anything else you would like
I don't see how it could be fully privacy preserving. It's the government trying to get the information, the repository is not secure!

However, you could come close. Sell a simple USB device that generates codes. It can only be purchased in person by showing ID--but the ID is not recorded. Down the road it can only be traced to the device, not to the purchaser. But you would no doubt see them for sale by unscrupulous individuals reselling them.
No, clearly not. A philanthropist may spend their own money however they want, but the government is spending taxpayer money and should not be so profligate. Why should we give that money to racists and antisemites? Especially a really wealthy institution like Columbia? Let the money go to a school that doesn’t employ racists, or directly to researchers. Researchers do not need to work at schools, you know. Or return the money to the people it was taken from; that would be the best policy economically. Either way we can do something better with it.
That’s not the issue.

The problem is that Google owns both sides of the internet - the browser on your computer and the search engine to find everything.

As a result, they control your perception of the internet.

If a site doesn’t work, you as the user thinks the site doesn’t work. You don’t think oh, my browser is broken. Also, if you don’t find a site on Google the. To you, it doesn’t exist.

As a result, you have to bend your website to satisfy both Google search and Google chrome.

That’s why this is an issue. Because of those two things, Google effectively controls the internet, and you as a user or you as a website owner have essentially zero recourse when Google does something that harms you.
It's about the only way to vote against him, since he's an unelected official.
> There is no foundation with the budget to even maintain a web browser

There doesn't need to be. Google can keep building it just with regulators out of sight.

IBM and lots of other companies "donate" software for similar reasons.
Carl Schmitt would agree, or maybe Helmut Schmidt, too, when he was Mayor of Hamburg in 1962: "We didn't refer to the Constitution much, in those days"
Why wouldn't you - the average person has few ways to influence big players and voting with their dollar is by far the most effective.

I wanted a Tesla for years. I wouldnt consider buying one now.
>a stronger Russia

Russia is in its death throes. The invasion of Ukraine was inevitable since it needs to expand outward to remain demographically solvent, which it cannot in the long run even with Ukraine. [0]

[0]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ec/Ru...
I've been shopping Ford Mavericks and they have no incentives other than a 3 year lease. They are hot because they are filling a market niche that is in-demand. Incentives are priced accordingly.

Low demand, high incentives. High demand, low incentives.
Even if he wasn't morally reprehensible, the Cybertruck is probably the ugliest and worst built car of all time and the rest of the lineup has a history of major quality issues as well. Meanwhile, the competition has majorly caught up with the lead Tesla blew. In 2025 a Tesla isn't worth buying over any number of other EVs
Seventh post promoting this site in the last 25 days: https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=sunami-ai. Previous postings were:

- Show HN: Y Combinator's Safe Analyzed by AI
4 points by sunami-ai 6 days ago |

- AI can become justice for those with lesser means
1 point by sunami-ai 12 days ago |

- Sunami's Legal AI Benchmark Challenge
2 points by sunami-ai 14 days ago |

- Show HN: Too old to apply to YC but I made this anyway (sunami.ai)
9 points by sunami-ai 24 days ago | 1 comment

- Show HN: Contract Risk Visualization
1 point by sunami-ai 25 days ago |

- Show HN: Inference Time Scaling for Legal AI
3 points by sunami-ai 25 days ago |

There were also previous promotional attempts from a different account also claiming to be the author by submission https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=ellellem and by posting https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41325267
> insane that people actually let elon’s government work influence their car buying decisions

Classic business owner fantasy:

Owner: I am going to to stiff you and make your life hell.

Customer: I don't care please let me buy your stuff at over-inflated prices. And keep stiffing me while I suffer because of you.
My source is the original article

The Canadian Automobile Dealers Association has urged Transport Canada to investigate, citing potential misuse of the rebate system. Attempts to reach Tesla for comment have gone unanswered.

The federal EV rebate program, facilitating over 500,000 electric vehicle purchases since its inception, was paused on January 13, 72 hours after the government signaled its potential suspension. Officials are now reviewing the Tesla sales data to determine if any irregularities occurred during the program’s final days.

A simple search yields https://tc.canada.ca/en/road-transportation/innovative-techn... for citations of program overview.

- "Individuals are eligible for one incentive"

- "Organizations and businesses are eligible for up to 10 incentives. Organizations and businesses that share common ownership, other than common ownership as a result of being a publicly traded company, are considered as one single organization eligible for a combined total of 10"

- "The incentive will be applied at the point-of-sale by the dealership once they have confirmed your eligibility"

The story is that Tesla sold as many cars, at four dealers in three days, almost as many as they sold in Canada in all of Q1 2024 at a time when their Canadian sales are trending down.

There are 1440 minutes in a day, they sold 8600 cars. Assuming a 12 hour dealer workday at 4 dealers. Articles say 2 cars a minute, I get one car per minute. It still they correctly process the incentives at point of sale or delivery? The investigating will find out.

The fraud also might be if anyone bought their own vehicles to sell later, or are otherwise violate the 10 rebates per organization limit and attempted to hide this.