skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think there are two reasons: choosing to change jobs on your own gives you ability to pick a time when it's minimally disruptive to yourself and your actual family, and then the pretend "family" vibe you cite is pushed by the employer in the first place. Companies insising on a game of make-believe where the relationship between employer and employee isn't transactional makes it hard not to be bothered by the hypocrisy. I agree that on average, the tech industry isn't as bad as other industries often are, but I don't see why that's a compelling argument not to care about the fact that it still could be better. There's nothing stopping me from wanting fewer tech layoffs and better conditions for workers in other industries as well (and in some circumstances even advocate for that even knowing that it might require changes to my own quality of life to achieve that; as a trivial example, I go out of my way to tip much larger than 20% when I use Uber because I'd rather risk getting ripped off than a driver not getting paid a fair wage for the work they do for me, even if it's at my own expense).

At the end of the day, everything is a balancing act, and the amount of change most of us can make as individuals is a drop in the bucket compared to the unfairness that people have to deal with every day. We all have to make judgement calls on where to take a stand and where to play it safe to avoid making things harder for ourselves without actually making a difference that ends up helping anyone, and if people are acting in good faith when trying to make those choices, I don't see any value in criticizing what they end up deciding. If anything, most of us in tech are probably in far more of a comfortable position to be able to speak out against employers (either or own or those in industries where workers are treated even worse), so I think there's a reasonable argument that it's more important for us to because of that. It's not a zero-sum game though; pointing out tech employer hypocrisy doesn't inherently take anything away from pointing out even worse things that other employers do.
Duty is to the Constitution and the Commander in Chief. And alliances are at the discretion of the President. The military will do whatever they are told in terms of who the have to be friends with.
There are two different things here: what non-Jewish citizens of Israel identify as, and what their functional status is. The first is a component of the world’s most intractable conflict; the second is a question of nationality in the most basic sense: citizenship, identification on passports, etc.

The second sense is the one I’m interested in, and in that one there are plenty of non-Jewish Israeli nationals. They have every right (and plenty of cause) to not identify as such, but that’s the situation as it concerns citizenship, voting rights, etc.

TL;DR: nationality gets used with at least two different meanings in the I/P conflict; one is intractable and the other is straightforward. The straightforward is worth remembering, because far-right Israelis have a vested interest in eliminating it and imposing an ethnic definition of nationality.
IME, Not interested at least prevents that single video from showing in my feed. It may reduce similar content from same or other channels--I see some reductions. Don't recommend channel always works for me as far as I noticed, except in search results which seems correct. I never expected it to not recommend similar channels, e.g. I filtered out Linus Tech Tips but watch similar content.

It probably helps that I only permit a handful of specific topics: physics, fun math, synthesizers (but not modular), tiny bit of music theory/training, StarCraft 2 (not SC1/BW), and recently the Nvidia/AMD GPU release saga.
Almost every time he talks about it you’ll see some detail like this link shared by someone else:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-02-13/trump-tel...
Yes, but the risk posture is very different. The question I like to ask is, 'what does it take to exploit a listening port on the overlay to get to a service':

- (1) need to bypass the mTLS requirement necessary to connect to the data plane (note, each hope is uses its own mTLS with its own, separate key).

- (2) have a strong identity that authorizes them to connect to the remote service in question (or bypass the authentication layer the controller provides through exploits; note again, each app uses separate and distinct E2EE, routing, and keys)

- (3) know what the remote service name is, allowing the data to target the correct service (not easy as OpenZiti has its own private DNS that does not need to comply to TLDs)

- (4) bypass whatever "application layer" security is also applied at the service (ssh, https, oauth, whatever)

- (5) know how to negotiate the end to end encrypted tunnel to the 'far' identity

So yes, if they can do all that, then they'd definitely be able to attack that remote service. Note, they only have access to 1 single service among hundreds, thousands, or potentially millions of services. Lateral movement is no possible. So the attacker would have to repeat each of the 5 steps for every service.

A colleague wrote this too, its from a slightly different angle but still very relevant - https://blog.openziti.io/no-listening-ports.
Open source software for modeling soft materials
Wgats your Point?
>If you take away or reduce their ad revenue, how do we expect them to survive?

I want YT to pay them out of what I pay for YT Premium.
> No one makes any good faith effort to understand the other side

I do and have.

Too many of their issues are simply made-up for me to get much traction, though. You see one outrageous thing after another and go “omg if that’s true it does seem pretty bad!” and then it’s almost always not true when you look into it. You can do this all day long with Fox News, let alone even nuttier sources.
It does not mean “understanding people” so you can pander to their misunderstandings and prejudices, and take all the power for yourself while making their situation even worse.

It does mean “understanding people” so you can pander to their misunderstandings and prejudices, and take all the power to do whatever you wanted to do. Their prejudices are the real part of reality.

Politicians who forget this fact get owned.
i've had good success getting ChatGPT to generate new short stories set in the diskworld universe and written in prachett's style. even the jokes were funny.
Yep, a sabbatical is taken to mean laid off and low performer. Have to sign an offer before leaving the old one.
Europe bets once again on RISC-V for supercomputing
People have different idea but roughly the Ukrainian plan seems to be hold the current lines approximately, destroy Russian assets and work on Russia collapsing economically to the extent they have to pull back a bit like their Afghanistan experience.

Anders Puck Nielsen on that https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNZ56C-f4a8&t=422s That's starting at the Ukrainian plan but it's worth watching the whole vid if you are interested.
Why Did Automakers Stop Making Cars with Pop-Up Headlights?
I was gifted the new set this last Christmas after losing my old versions in a fire, the fold out pages are there in the latest release.

Edited to add: Amazon often has fake or at least printed with lower quality/cost versions. It was hard to find a real copy of his concrete math book when I was searching. The 'i18n' edition is printed on the cheapest of cheap paper for that book. I suspect that is related. But the fan-out pages are in the sorting volume.

#2 Vol 3 is on the second edition, with the tape merge fanout between pages 338 and 339. So it would be a particular printing that didn't have it.
> And mostly overseas

Where is the data that supports that?

And by overseas what do you mean, or are we talking about USA "defaultism" here?
I downplay the news big time, and use it as a great source of humour for the straight up stupid individuals.

I have also started to act dumb while in social gaherings, like "oh I don't know that happened".

As an example.

Did Trump make presidency ? I didn't know.

That way I leave it at that and I don't let people tell them how they feel about whatever nonsense they are fed and obviously not throughly digesting.

Read books instead of news. Much better.
The latter points are true. But it's also the case that radical reskilling for very different job roles (with possibly rather different market salaries and, honestly, different from many people's job preferences) is tough too. Probably hard to come up with reliable rules.
> "we're better than everyone else and everyone else disagrees with my positions because they envy how awesome we are".

Now what American would ever think that?...
Re: economic sanctions against Russia. In 2019 Russia main exports went to EU and China and Belarus, while main import a were from US EU and China [0]. It will be crucial for EU to keep their sanctions or maybe even tighten them. Even if US stops their sanctions Russia will mostly buy technology from the US (for drilling). This will not solve Russia’s problem re:lower revenues.

I am very curious if EU is smart enough to keep and even tighten their sanctions. After all is European security that is threatened by Russia.

[0]

[https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/RUS/Yea...
I mean, you could describe the Trump administration's executive order requiring government agencies to stop using Gulf of Mexico and instead use Gulf of America as simply "changes in government paperwork." But I think it's obviously also an attempt to change the language.
I distinctly remember the lead up to the 2016 election. I remember having one conversation with a friend who is relatively affluent. Not independently wealthy but a top 1% earner. I had been watching Bernie gain steam and I brought this up in the context of how unhappy with the status quo people seemed to be.

This immediately got dismissed. "Everything is fine". It is a mistake to paint all Trump voters as just being proto-fascists (which the majority are). Many ended up there because they desperately wanted change and establishment candidates were just offering more of the same. Hilary absolutely was a "more of the same" candidate. And the entire GOP primary field (21 at one point) were "more of the same". That's why Trump won the primary. That, combined with Hilary's massive negatives and her generally being a terrible candidate, were why Trump won in the first place.

2020 was an anomaly in many ways. We had Covid lockdowns and were coming off 4 years of Trump chaos. Because of the lockdown, voting was made substantially easier with early voting and mail-in ballots. The more people vote, the more Democrats win. It's why voter suppression is a key part of the Republican platform (make no mistake, "voter ID" is simply voter suppression). Were it not for the pandemic, I very much suspect Trump would've won re-election. Biden was a terrible candidate and never should've been the nominee. Clyburn basically handed him the nomination (in South Carolina) and Warren stayed in long enough to split Bernie's vote, the second time the DNC had actively sabotaged Bernie's campaign.

Remember in 2020, Bernie had Joe Rogan's endorsement.

The Democrats are really just Republican Lite now. Kamala's immigration plan was Trump's 2020 immigration plan. Kamala abandoned opposition to the death penalty from the party platform and called for the most "lethal" military. She courted never Trumpers like Liz Cheney. Like seriously, who was that for? She refused to separate herself from Biden on any issue despite his historic unpopularity. And of course, she refused to deviate from the deeply unpopular position on Israel-Gaza. In short, she offered the voters absolutely nothing.

In this election, progressive voter initiatives outperformed the Democratic party by a massive margin. For example, minimum wage increases passed in Missouri, a state Trump won by 22. Trump won Florida by 14 yet recreational cannabis and abortion protection got 55-59% of the vote (unfortunately, you need 60% to pass in Florida).

The Democratic Party exists to actively sabotage any progressive momentum. We didn't get a convention primary after Biden withdrew because the DNC was scared a progressive candidate would win. They stuck us with Kamala to avoid that.

My point here is that Trump doesn't have and has never had a majority. He only won each time because there was effectively zero opposition. A chunk of Trump's base are simply people desperate for change. At least Trump lied to them and gave them something to vote for. Democrats wouldn't even lie to them and tell them they were going to fix housing and egg prices and give them healthcare.
I live Django, but you cant compare it to Latavel, which is much more extensive
I agree, but would add that many issues (left and right) here are more extreme. I think two things are a self-reinforcing cycle driving both ends of the political spectrum to extremes. First, hyper-partisanship has emerged where it was formerly held in check by social norms within our political institutions. Second, US politics has become a national pastime, replacing sports and other things in our attention. Everyone is able to be part of the commentator class by virtue of social media (I cite this thread, including my comment, as an example of this).

Normie centrist views tend not to garner much attention either in traditional media or in online forums. Instead, we tend to focus much more on the issues that clearly and quickly establish our membership and bonafides in a particular group.

The same extreme-voices-get-heard feature gets recapitulated through our political system. Especially the rise of getting primaried from the left or right. Break ranks with your side? Get primaried. The result is that, to get heard over the fray, political candidates need to articulate more extreme views and stick to them.

Lots of words have been spilled about how various electoral reforms could get us out of this mess. For me, I believe ranked choice voting and open primaries represent an optimal trade-off between "legal, and plausibly implementable" and "yield biggest improvements to electoral system." A major complaint against ranked choice voting is that it tends to bias for more moderate centrists, which I think would be a not-bad problem to have.
Ahahaha. It's an "open" forum where? Parent poster got flagged, his post no longer readable (unless a user enabled flagged posts?) and you suggest discussion to them. This HN crowd is sarcastic!!
While not as good. It is still 100x better than dns based blocker
>because they are talented enough to have some level of choice

That's doing a whole lot of work. I don't want to get into the myth of meritocracy, but you have to be extremely lucky to be able to invest the time and effort to end up in a career that is personally fulfilling. Not saying we disagree. There is absolutely a subset of workers who's values and interests align with what is currently economically viable, but they're few and far between and the odds are stacked against most.
Mostly correct yes and for certian users I actually do encourage them to try out edge.

Many users are so used to Chrome though it is jarring to switch to edge. Open them in two workspaces and flip between them, although the UI are both browsers, edge feel like the Temu version if a browser, at least to me.

But then I use Zen/Vivaldi so I personally find most other browsers these says a little weird.
> Even Donald Trump now admits that stalling NATO expansion and not treating Russian security concerns with utter contempt could have prevented this.

EVEN Donald Trump? As if minihands is the staunchest critic of Russia? I mean, c’mon. Pretty much _only_ Donald Trump claims this outside the context of actual Russian propaganda.

It’s a terribly flimsy argument. Like, no-one has ever, as far as I know, said that Poland should invade Belarus because it joined the CSTO, say. Because that would be obviously ridiculous; actually joining, never mind wanting to join, a defensive treaty organisation is no sort of excuse for invasion. None of this makes any sense unless you accept to start with that Russia has some sort of rights over Ukraine, and no-one really buys that except for Russia.
Trump doesn't "have policy views". Trump _is_ the policy and the view.
The war is the genocide. Putin’s invasion would have killed thousands, maybe tens of thousands and been over in a week. Western involvement changed that into the deaths of hundreds of thousands. What more effective means of self-genocide could Europe conceive? Germany cannot exactly round up a whole class of their own for slaughter again in their current political environment. The West (England, Germany, France, etc) caused WWI and WWII not Russia. Now we (America) should trust their vision to avoid WWIII? We should be clear who the problem is and stay out of it.
This seems like a huge own goal for the US.

Who will want to buy American military technology, when the ability to employ it is at the whim of whoever wins the next election?

Especially as it's clear now than any alliance with the US is fragile at best, and could end overnight depending on which side of the bed Trump wakes up on.
My use case for a search engine is for the search engine to return all URLs that match the search pattern I enter. Then I decide which of these I want to visit, not the search engine, becuase the search engine doesn't and cannot know what I want (especially since I might not even know). It's job is to spider the web and create the database for me to search in. It's job is not to tell me what I want like a social networking site.
I often hear this from non-veterans, much older veterans, or individuals using it as a political talking point.

As a veteran married to a disabled veteran, the VA has gotten significantly better over the years to the point where I use it over other options provided by my employer. I maintain a pretty large network of friends from the military spread around the country and it’s more common than not.

Anecdotal of course and I’m sure some areas are worse than others but at this point the VA does provide great care. Ten years ago I wouldn’t say the same.

This is more concerning than anything as there are many who rely on the VA for care - of all types.
No one on the left is surprised by what Trump is doing. The people who are surprised are his voters.

"I thought he was going to hurt those other people, not me."

Well. About that.

The problem isn't even left vs right. It's a media system that has parted company with reality and deliberately promoted lies and rage bait for clicks and distraction.

It's a huge machine. It's not just Fox, it's the entire network of neoliberal, now neofascist media outlets - from think tanks and "serious journalists", to bot farms and weaponised social media that promotes selected views and deboosts others, to podcasts, influencers, megachurches, mainstream econ schools, MBAs, startups... all promoting the same dysfunctional reality-denying neoliberal supremacist views under various guises.
Because they were growing so slowly that I thought they are dead. Startups which cannot grow fast are default dead.
As a cursor user, it was annoying at first to be using a vscode fork but honestly it turned out to not really be an issue. Biggest issue was pylance not working and having to switch to basedpyright—not a major thing for me but could be for others with a lot of existing python code.

Now as the maintainers of cursor and the ones working on the fork? I have no idea but I imagine it is pretty annoying.
> there are a lot of jobs that make it difficult to continue past a few years

This has been a lot of my career. All my long, successful jobs have lasted around 2-3 years, and it's the time it takes for the company to realize the initiative wasn't worth it. I count four of these stints where I left, and the team was essentially dissolved within a year. I'm not saying I was the key person for the project; I just saw the writing on the wall.

It's been career limiting not having a large-scope project on a growing team, but I don't know if this is something about me, something about the projects I'm a good fit for, or the reality that a lot of projects and teams don't survive 5 years, and I've been exposed to some survivor bias of smart people who have gotten lucky.
Yeah? What's your enlightened take, Sherlock?
The secret is that top performers are hired by word of mouth, they don't go through the usual processes.
It's quite frustrating, but it's clear propaganda spread. There's a complete vacuum of media for leftists in the US, and a tiny amount of money goes a long ways to cementing desired propaganda. Seeing the entire left in the US turn on Ukraine calling them Nazis, when in fact they were occupied by Nazis, with all the terrors that entails, and were planned to have half their population killed and the other half enslaved to Nazis, well, it's red pilling. The left in the US is so weak and leaderless that it is easily co-opted to any sort of end.
OMG such a bold assertion with no backing data…
I think we should probably ban reading old books. They seem to infect people with bad ideas.
What was the age range of the referred 2023 sample of workers?
I've worked over 12 years at the same company. Finding a new job would be difficult as remote pays lower and isn't the best fit for me, my area isn't known for tech job, my spouse doesn't want to relocate, I work for one of the biggest employers in my area (fewer choices outside the company), and we are seeing the highest sector unemployment since the dot com bubble. Oh, and my disability makes it all worse. My job has been an absolute hell hole for the past 2 years, but internal and external job opportunities have been extremely limited.
It's worth noting that labor unions have mobilized all over the globe in solidarity with Palestine. Given that the main bone of contention in this country is continued material and financial support to a military campaign it feels odd to lump in with "social liberalism".
$176,100 this year, and you should also include Medicare which is 1.45% and has the same cap. That does mean a base 7.65% federal tax rate for most W-2 earners. But when you work out the math on the effective tax rates for income tax (not payroll) it takes a lot to hit 25% as your effective federal income tax rate.

Around $350,000 gets you to a 24.8% effective federal income tax rate if you're single and only take the standard deductible, $700k if married. That puts you in the top 3% and 1%, respectively, of incomes in the US these days.

But that gets reduced when you include things like tax advantaged retirement accounts, various tax credits, dependents, paying for health insurance, possibly being able to itemize (more likely at those incomes than the US median income). So really you have to be making something like $400k-500 as a single person to hit 25%, and $800k+ for a married person.