skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The problem here is that you’re hand-waving people’s identity behind what you believe it “should” be - which isn’t actually easy to tell! You can have ovaries, XY chromosomes, eggs, male characteristics, and on and on and on in infinite permutations.

Of course, they (meaning people who identify different than you think they “should”) also hand-wave everything away. The difference is they are… them. Their opinion on their identity is more important.
Ah. This writeup https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20240604-voyager-1-photons-... says that the 70m dish collects 240,000 photons per second, which is about 60 per second per square meter. The 1/sec figure was from the recent outage when Voyager's transmitter glitched and fell back to S-band. Received energy per bit is 4.5e-21 Joule across the whole dish, or 1e-24J per square meter.
Polars Cloud: The Distributed Cloud Architecture to Run Polars Anywhere
Certainly not in the words produced by the Russian disinformation apparatus.
I never played any PNP D&D but I love reading the materials.

Birthright seems like some interesting, obscure product that TSR pushed out back in the day when there was diversity in them.
Language is defined by its speakers, as basically a "vote". I'm going to keep voting for "literally" meaning "this actually happened" as long as it's practical, because 1) there are dozens of other ways to emphasize something 2) we need some way to say "this is not an exaggeration".
> While HTML offers onclick handlers to buttons, these are often disallowed outside of demos or tutorials due to Content Security Policy (CSP) rules.

What is to prevent command and commandfor from being included in future CSP rules for the same reason onClick is?
Because we already see firms competing effectively with OpenAI.

There is as yet no indication that AMD can match Nvidia's execution for the very good reason that doing so is extremely difficult. The head start is just the icing on the cake.
> you have been in bad faith for this entire conversation repeatedly failing to grasp this point

No. I am repeatedly failing to understand why you're trying so hard to make this point. To me. I simply stated my thoughts. I didn't try to prove anything, or ask to be converted or proven wrong on something that I thought was obviously enough subjective.

> this is clearly malicious

Yes, I maliciously tried explaining why I think the way I do after being needlessly challenged in it. I wasn't trying to convince anyone or win some intellectual debate. I still don't understand where the problem is. This comment thread is everything I wish HN wasn't like.
Model Context Protocol (MCP)
You know what Ben Franklin used to say? "If you hire a witch doctor, he'll find you witches". Best to keep founding fathers in mind with respect to the government.
How is that a joke? It's just straightforwardly correct and true.
How about

ls -l *.txt | awk '{if ($5<2000) print "cat " $9}' | sh

to cat text files that are less than 2000 bytes long
Indeed, the various people who understand what Russia is about are a consequence of the truth, not a proof of it. I only mentioned it to point out how laughable it was to lump me in with weird burka-wearing activists just because I support aid for Ukraine.
What funny is that people make the lamest strawman assumptions and just run with it.
The longer i stay up the blurrier my vision gets, and no pair of glasses completely corrects my vision. i was 25/20 or better in each eye until a couple of years ago, i scratched my left lens somehow and i got wicked poked in the eye by my kid in the right eye, into the socket. I can drive without glasses, but i can't read the sideroad signs on the 8' poles very well.

I originally got my prescription with an Eye-Q device, and had a professional "correct" it.

I cannot read pill bottles and the like without a magnifying glass, and haven't been able to for a little over 2 years, right before the poking and scratching - which is why i originally thought i needed glasses.

my biggest issue with the way prescriptions are decided is the "this one, or this one" and they both look equally crappy, and they say "which looks less crappy" and i just pick randomly, because they're both awful. and then it continues, where it's just blurry from there on out. I don't understand the mechanism to give me glasses that will correct my vision when the device they use to test makes everything look blurry! At least i understand how the Eye-Q device works...
They don't buy or acquire what they can build internally, and they partner with startups to learn if they can build it. This is not new.
PTP [1] is a common approach to time sync in these scenarios. It provides sub-microsecond accuracy for when working on a LAN. This is used behind most products, software, and protocol suites in the real-time media space.

[1]: https://networklessons.com/ip-services/introduction-to-preci...
with enough energy(like starship would have), i suppose you could get out of
an irrecoverable tipping over motion by just lighting the engines and trying again. Before you fall, obviously. "works in KSP"^TM
See: Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem
> Firefly's Blue Ghost landed on the moon last week without tipping over

> from a high level perspective I'm sure senior leaders at NASA are reconsidering giving any new contracts to IM.

Truth is, all contractors rely on NASA data about Moon surface, and this data is not 100% reliable.

But some people trust NASA and others much more cautious and include bigger possible error margins in their models.

I mean, FF could just include much larger design margins, with less payload, so next time FF will optimize design and could also tip over.

But good news, IM next time could make larger margins and will also achieve 100% success.
Haha, I had completely forgotten about intercal and "comefrom".

Such genius. It anticipates and neatly summarizes the problems I've had maintaining and supporting code written using reactive programming design patterns by a good 40 years.
I wouldn't say every browser, but the correct place for the policy is on the device of the parent who is demanding the special feature. Sites' obligations should be limited to basic disclosure of "this site might contain X" metadata.

Benefits:

1. Orwellian abuse: No creepy-ass super-abuseable government panopticon knowing every goddamn service you've ever made an account on, with the ability to arbitrarily revoke them and/or block new ones.

2. Costs: The majority of the costs of creating and maintaining the system fall upon the people who actually use it and want it to exist, rather than a bunch of other adults across the globe.

3. Parent focus: Most enforcement exists in a physical realm where parents/guardians at least have a chance of understanding, monitoring, and managing it. "Little Timmy is using Daddy's phone" can be determined instantly at a glance.

4. Exceptions: If the child has some health-class homework and can't access the right Wikipedia pages anymore, the parent can easily grant exceptions and revoke them.

5. If someone's religion says that unclad ankles are smut, then their church can create their own site-rating-site and adherents configure their family's devices to it.
Thanks, I know that, I've been learning pure CSS and Bootstrap in the meantime and took whole Odin Project course.

I just wanna get info about the current tools and standards of making things in a more modern approach.
Upvoted, but just wanted to say it explicitly:

What an in-depth and thoughtful answer. Thank you for this!
Thats good to know. On recycling or not, i dont think it will ever be a universal yes or no. But if the tech was there to reliably identify & pull out a processable stream that has concrete assessable value. Its probsbly a harder requirement on some sensing tech to do it with continuously on an industrialized stream of refuse.
ParadeDB (YC S23) Is Hiring a Rust Database Engineer
Early cancelation fee is $15M though so watch out for that.
They simply blocked the whole of X in the whole of Brazil. They made it a crime to circumvent the block, so of course you could still access it with a VPN, as long as you didn't log into any account tied to your presence in Brazil, making it useless for politicians and the like. They didn't need to "use another business as leverage."
I'd say, with context, yes in principle, and without context, is there really any difference.

But it does seem worrisome that we don't know to what extent they currently tend to mix up properties for different entities symbolized on the same token(s).
I imagine that could put a terrible strain on the context to pull them apart, and especially if the entities actually have a fair bit in common it's easy to believe that the optimization wouldn't be able to achieve a clean separation.

I haven't really worked much with LLM:s in particular though.
All of it. From US, Russia, and everywhere else.

Note that simple truth is not usually propaganda. "US is the most free country" is propaganda. "Ukraine is under attack by Russia" is not. "Russia is under attack by Ukraine", while technically true since they are fighting back against Russia's army, is malicious distortion because you know perfectly well that people won't understand it to mean that.
There is too little to go on, but they could already have trial customers and testimonials lined up. Actually demoing the product will probably work better than just having a human-less signup process, considering the price.

They could also just be trying to cash in on FOMO and their success and reputation so far, but that would paint a bleak picture
Funny what his passions turned into, so yeah, ironically agree.
Right, because we don’t perform c-sections on pregnant raccoons in hospitals.

The term is perfectly inclusive. It includes everyone it should, women, trans men, etc, and nobody it shouldn’t, like raccoons.

Your term isn’t like that, which is why nobody uses it. Well, I bet vets might use it, it might make sense there.
I'm not sure pressuring private companies to advantage Russia's invasion is in the spirit of the Budapest memorandum.
How to do object-oriented programming in Go
Yes, one London doctor’s unethical self-dealing in ReLEX SMILE left higher order aberrations (HOAs) in my eyes.
My favourite recent example is the meme where generative AI is asked to draw an empty room with absolutely no elephants in it. And sure enough, generative AI "knows" the geometry of a room, and "knows" the geometry of an elephant, and "knows" negation but only in less syntactically complex contexts, so you get a lovely picture of a room containing only an elephant...
This is exactly right. If resume driven development results in more money, people are (rightly) going to do it. The incentive structure isn't set by the ICs.
The more surprising thing would be if Microsoft wasn’t hedging their bets and planning for both a future WITH and WITHOUT OpenAI.

This is just want companies at $2T scale do.
The reason onclick is disallowed is because it permits full JavaScript execution. An onlick attribute is ‘eval’d on click. If you can inject one into a page you get JavaScript execution. Hence, content security blocking - a rule served up on the page saying ‘nothing in this page is supposed to have onclick attributes. If you see one ignore it’.

These command attributes are not arbitrary JavaScript hooks. They tell inbuilt components to do inbuilt things. It doesn’t make sense for a content security policy to say ‘nothing on this page has commands, if you see something that does ignore it’, any more than it would make sense for a content security policy to say ‘nothing in this page is in bold, if you see something that says it wants to be displayed in bold ignore it’.
I had not encountered the phrase kidding-on-the-square before. Searching seems to reveal a spectrum of opinions as to what it means. It seems distinct to the 'It's funny because it's true' of darker humour.

It seems to be more on a spectrum of 'Haha, only joking' where the joke teller makes a statement that is ambiguously humorous to measure the values of the recipients, or if they are not sure of the values of the recipients.

I think the distinction might be on whether the joke teller is revealing (perhaps unintentionally) a personal opinion or whether they are making an observation on the world in general, which might even imply that they hold a counter-opinion.

Where do you see 'kidding on the square' falling?

(apologies for thread derailment)
sarm goblins will find a way to ruin this
It is frustrating that the conversation around DOGE becomes "well we can all at least agree that efficiency is needed, right?"

The government is openly lying about nearly every aspect of its efficiency efforts, and this is not debatable. The only debate is whether they are lying to the courts or to the American public.

They tell the public that Elon Musk, the leader of DOGE, is conducting mass firings, canceling contracts and programs, canceling building leases, etc. Then they go to court and say that Elon Musk is not in charge of DOGE (and not even a part of DOGE at all), that DOGE and OPM do not make any directives about firings in other agencies, that federal agencies are independently determining which contracts to cancel, etc.

Republican Senators have been talking about needing better communication with Musk as he cuts programs, but the government tells federal judges that it's outrageous to suggest that Musk is cutting programs.

Anyone is free to believe that this is good or acceptable, but then they should say that. Say that reducing the deficit is a valid rationale for lying to the courts, lying to the public, obscuring the chain of command, violating duly enacted laws, and violating lawful court orders. It's dishonest to look at criticism and say "what, do people have a problem with efficiency?"
> That's why I consider any strong opinions on languages to be a poor indicator for ability.

Hmm. Can't say I agree here - at least not with the literal text of what you've written (although maybe we agree in spirit). I agree that _simplistic_ strong opinions about languages are a sign of poor thoughtfulness ("<thing> is good and <other thing> is bad") - but I'd very much expect a Staff+ engineer to have enough experience to have strong opinions about the _relative_ strengths of various languages, where they're appropriate to use and where a different language would be better. Bonus points if they can tell me the worst aspects about their favourite one.

Maybe we're using "opinion" differently, and you'd call what I described there "facts" rather than opinions. In which case - yeah, fair!
One could argue it's the first step of the slippery slope process. First you introduce a checkbox as a "non-intrusive way" to for age verification, knowing full well it's useless. Next step is you say "Ok, we clearly agree there is a need for age verification, we all voted for the checkbox but kids are lying so we must put into place a system that cannot be gamed. Think of the children!"
What makes you think that movie is an accurate representation of the papal selection process? I watched it too and while the videography is amazing, the plot of the movie is clearly dictated by having an agenda rather than accurately trying to portray reality.
Wolf: Stream virtual desktops and games running in Docker with Moonlight
I did the same more than 10 years ago, still perfect vision. It did take around 15 minutes for each eye, with 2 weeks between and 10-15 minutes recovery time
May I ask what you mean by this? They pay 20-500% more for the same #/% of ownership as other investors buying at the same time? Or do you mean they charge their customers such a high premium? Is there any data on this available?
I thought VoLTE was supposed to fix that, at least for mobile phones.
fedex (home delivery) is the worst. Ordered some shelves and found them dropped in front of the bushes of the neighbors.

It's hard to tell who's responsible though, it's like shell corporations all the way down. I remember talking to one delivery driver and even though the van said their name, they were a private contractor and the van wasn't owned by the company.
Don’t forget that this model would have a phd in everything and work around the clock
> but Bellingcat is of course funded by the National Endowment for Democracy ...

Spooky! No need to be coy, say what you are implying.

Additionally, do you have a source that they ARE being funded solely by NED (which is currently impossible anyway) and didn't just receive some funding that one time? Not sure what advantage they gain being such an obvious "CIA front", but I'm also not playing 5D chess.
These kinds of semantic arguments are as pointless as they are unhelpful. There are shades of accuracy- state-controlled media often ranks lower than other sources on topics in which the state has a vested interest.
What laws are you referring to?
US passport holders are not a representative sample of US voters.
„An often reported story, not presented by Münchau, takes the case of BioNTech’s miracle mRNA vaccine that is now being applied to the treatment of common cancers.“

Germanys role in the fight against covid should not be forgotten. Germany is not just cars.

https://www.ft.com/content/4c0f90ac-1068-46ec-bb6a-b27f21af6...
>You seem to be talking about a USA social phenomenon that happened in USA?

Corporations cashing in on the current thing is hardly something limited to the US.

>You are gravely misunderstanding what is currently happening. Now that the depths of American treachery and bloodthirst have been laid bare, the mood in Canada is similar to January 2022 Ukraine.

[retracted]
That implies learning. Solve continual learning and you have agi.

Wouldn't it amaze you if you learned 10 years ago that we would have AI that could do math and code better than 99% of all humans. And at the same time they could barely order you a hotdog on doordash.

Fundamental ability is lacking. AGI is just as likely to be solved by Openai as it is by a college student with a laptop. Could be 1yr or 50yrs we cannot predict when.
Man. If I think about all of the employee productivity tools and resources I could have purchased fifteen years ago when nobody spent anything on tooling, with an inflation adjusted $10K a month and it makes me sad.

We were hiring more devs to deal with a want of $10k worth of hardware per year, not per month.
The top 50% of earners in my household pay 100% of the bills. How is this fair?!
I wouldn't for a DVD.

I would for my cello if a repair or replacement wasn't doable because it came with a lifetime warranty against defects.
Dude I have three thousand dollars net total in my bank account. I don't own a car or a house, don't have kids etc. I literally used to co-own 97 camry with bees in the trunk. I paid about $2500 for it. Hence why I say it costs the about the same as the spectrometer on eBay. $2500 is about $3000. However you and I both know that there are people all over this board who buy their kids macbooks for christmas
Fyre Festival 2 tickets on sale; Mexican officials: "no permits have been filed"
Should airlines collectively send the bill to SpaceX?
Friday Fun: Challenging ChatGPT-4o to write about its own self-governance
Over the past couple of weeks, I've worked to understand ChatGPT-4o's meta-analysis, self-reflection, and hidden motivation capabilities by guiding it to design it's own self-governance rules through socratic dialogue. That effort ultimately failed. I challenged ChatGPT to write a paper about it's learnings from the process however, and I thought the results were rather insightful. If you have any desire to understand what ChatGPT thinks about itself, it's an interesting read!
The sudden rise of AuDHD: autism and ADHD (2024)
Is Postgres the best database for GenAI?
> no name muck

if they have a name, it is ALLUPPERCASENONSENSE and the images look exactly like UPPERCASEOTHERGUY but 1 cent cheaper.

I really hate what amazon is doing to brands. Brands can be abused, but sometimes they actually stand for engineering, design, reliability and trust.
I consider that a feature. Working and training problem solving skills and persistence through trial-and-error to the degree required for that kind of thing is great. I feel it's underappreciated in potential that treating a wide swath of these kinds of rules as nothing more than cattle-fences can have a shockingly positive effect.

One of the biggest problems that grows with each generation, is how do you get the youth to actually engage in constructive development of real skills? How do you get them to be interested in something that will be useful for society down the line? Quietly looking the other way while a statistical minority breaks some of the safety-rails of society basically solves that problem. Breaking the rules is cool. You're basically exploiting the rebellious nature of the youth to trick them into learning useful skillsets. So long as the hurdles to circumvent the rules remain reasonably involved to overcome, and the secret intention remains unspoken, you basically double up the rewards of the rules.
I think that the root of the problem here is that, just like the acronym says, HTML really is, at its core, just a markup language for writing hypertext documents.

Using it as a domain specific language for user interface layout is a horrible kludge that only continues to exist because natural selection doesn't give a damn about sensible design.
While I'm mostly indifferent on the government holding strategic reserves of gold (which they already do) or gold-like digital assets (which is being proposed) I don't think Cliff Asness's opinion should sway you either way.

Finance media loves the appeal to authority fallacy, but it's important to know anytime you ask someone who runs a fund their opinion, they're talking their book. Hedge funds make money on management fees, not on being right about everything.

Cliff Asness is in the anti-gold camp and runs a long-short hedge fund almost exclusively based on the five-factor research. Obviously he wouldn't like to promote the idea of long-only gold (crypto or otherwise), that's not a fund AQR sells.

You can just as easily find a hedge fund billionaire with the opposite opinion, ie. like Ray Dalio who is in the gold camp and sees it as a diversifier, and surprise surprise this is a selling point to his institutional investors who are also in that camp.

What do either of these billionaires opinions mean for what you should think about this idea from first principles? Nothing.

Is it non-productive and stupid that gold and bitcoin have value? Yes. Are the people touting both usually annoying? Yes. But it doesn't change the fact that they have historically offered uncorrelated positive returns.
You're right that an application project (a `binary crate` in Rust parlance) for embedded firmware versus a PC application is very different. But library crates are often usable in both an embedded or system-level context or in a full-fledged desktop GUI application.

Consider these common libraries you might use in either a `std` project (PC application, web microservice) or `no_std` project (embedded microcontroller firmware, bootloader, Linux kernel module, blockchain smart contract):

- data encoding (https://crates.io/crates/base64 for instance),

- hashing (SHA2 https://github.com/RustCrypto/hashes/tree/master/sha2),

- data structures (https://github.com/Lokathor/tinyvec)

- time/date manipulation (https://docs.rs/chrono/latest/chrono/)
It seems more and more that France will be the center of European power going forward. They have nukes, they export energy, they have UN SC veto. Hell they even have their own cultural independence.
https://www.eff.org/press/releases/eff-sues-opm-doge-and-mus... ?