skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
pragmatically, costs. to do it right you need to promise the data isn't leaving, so you'd need to deploy your own stack (costly but not too much). you're explicitly replacing 'people' which left or right probably don't have much support for and people already are incensed when they hear about Musk/Trump, now bring in Machines taking Jobs.

it could happen in the next 4 years, i wouldn't write it off. but all cabinet members need to bring themselves up to speed. trump appears to be moving quickly but it's because he spent 2+ years thinking up everything he's doing. i doubt cabinet picks spent similar time - they probably weren't even sure he'd pick them.
Worse, it’s richest country on earth complaining about being too poor and having to enact austerity measures — implemented by the richest person on the planet who’s personal pay is much, much higher than any of the savings he’s found so far.

I’ve seen many occasions in my career when some manager had flown across the country with a business class ticket, stayed in a fancy hotel, rented a luxury car, and turned up to an all-hands-on-deck meeting to announce in a grave tone that the minimum wage workers are just going to have to make some sacrifices.

This is almost precisely what’s going on with DOGE except you can substitute private jet and secret service motorcade. And instead of minimum wage, it’s…
less than minimum wage.

The richest are complaining about being too poor to help the needy, and fixing the issue by cutting every program that helps those under the poverty line.
> This is the same as not citing a source at all

Maybe. I churn out solutions and designs based on fragmented tickets and hearsay user feedback all day long.
Deciding to not vote is agreeing with the majority of those who did vote.
There is such a thing as adjective order.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjective#Order

Arguably "private" is origin and "robotic" is purpose.
For sure. I guess you could run static analysis on the gates to determine what "hits" and what doesn't -- I'm not a chip designer, but I know the tools are super sophisticated, and these are, ultimately, very small circuits.

I know that some early AI physics-enabled designs utilized "weird" analog features, but at small geometries especially, and in real life, everything is analog anyway. If these are gate-level, I guess the interpretability questions will be literally on assessing logic. There's so many paths to dig in here, it's super interesting.
We should educate people about what questions you should, and should not, be asking LLMs in the first place. You really should not be asking an LLM

> "Did fighters of the Azov battalion burn an effigy of Trump?”

LLMs are horrible at answering questions about small isolated incidents. Part of modern media literacy should include understanding what LLMs can reliably answer.
Unfortunately I don't think there is any real metric-based way to prevent this type of behavior, it just has to be old fashioned encouraged from the top. At a certain size it seems like this stops scaling though
I don't know why you've been downvoted so much. I'd expect a company to issue replacements, not refunds, when they're not the end retailer.
Or Abrash?
A long, long time ago, during my studies, I maintained and set up Novell networks, Windows NT, and a proprietary Linux (?) server with specialized law firm software designed for legal partnerships. What I learned from that experience: Lawyers, notaries, and debt collectors rely heavily on text templates.

In a sense, you could say they’ve been conditioned for decades to adopt predefined text. And since this approach has worked so often, perhaps they’ve lost the habit of double-checking everything that a piece of software suggests to them.
The problem I see is that all the current AI leaders are spending way more than their revenue in training costs to stay ahead of the open source models. As an example, in 2024 Anthropic made $908 million in revenue, but spent $5.6 billion on training. If they cut down on training costs to become profitable, it would only take a year or two before open source models outperformed Anthropic's models, essentially making them worthless. With this in mind, I don't see how it's possible for Anthropic to generate a return on investment.
> This happened to me literally just an hour ago when I wanted to put a DSL in a field in a config file. json-schema (the "config" schema) doesn't let me write code to validate this and reject it.

You can embed DSLs in CUE. It's a bit unwieldy because you have to essentially reproduce the DSL grammar in CUE, and it may not be performant, but yeah, it's doable. Can you provide more details?

> You might argue that "these rules bolted on top aren't part of the schema" or "this is validation that you can do after the json schema validates" but there is benefit to combining them - namely, code coherence and validation error consistency.

I would argue that it's a slippery slope. Consider v1 where an enum is statically defined as Employee or Manager. Then in v2 we add VP and CEO. Then in v3 actually the list of permitted titles needs to be fetched from a database populated by HR. Is it still correct to put this in configuration validation? What if the person writing the configuration doesn't have permissions to read from HR's database? So nothing should work?
… and then 40% of the GDP comes from the public sector.

Centralized systems are more efficient by definition, it’s why the public sector can seemingly magically multiply money where the private sector cannot.
searching for "frequency comb laser" on Aliexpress doesn't yield fitting results currently for me.

https://de.aliexpress.com/w/wholesale-frequency-comb-laser.h...
Wait, I'm a bit confused by what you're saying. Did I miss something recent? There's been recent executions of protestors in the US?
It's not just shifting complexity. It improves locality of behavior (LoB). You can look at a <button> element and immediately know what it does (within the limited domain of "command"s). This is a dramatic improvement to readability.
>It's not encrypted in transit

Agree.

But who said that all passwords or shiboleths should all be encrypted in transit?

It can serve as a canary for someone snooping your traffic. Even if you encrypt it, you don't want people snooping.

To date of my subdomains that I never publish, I haven't had anyone attempting to connect with them.

It's one of those redundant measures.

And it's also one of those risks that you take, you can maximize security by staying at home all day, but going out to take the trash is a calculated risk that you must take or risk overfocusing on security.

It's similar to port knocking. If you are encrypting it, it's counterproductive, it's a low effort finishing touch, like a nice knot.
Would love to speak with you for 20 mins to learn from your experience. If interested, ping me at jbornhorst [at] gmail [dot] com and I'll coordinate times.
It depends upon what Y is. If X and Y require age verification for in-person purchases and age verification is required to purchase X online, it is reasonable to assume that age verification for Y will follow. Some may call that a slippery slope. In reality it is simply a loophole in the law. Either way, it is reasonable to assume there is a bottom to that slope. It is not reasonable to assume that X opens up all possibilities.

That said, I understand where the EFF is coming from. Data collection and "sharing" is rampant these days. Any meaningful form of age verification opens up the potential for abuse. What I don't understand is their failure to address how to handle restricted goods.
I’m talking about the top 1%. And they’ve got most of the money. They should pay most of the taxes.
Microsoft drops some CoreWeave services ahead of $35B IPO (ft.com)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43285311
If it's Mustafa vs Sam Altman, I know where I'd put my money. As much as I like Satya Nadella I think he's made some major hiring mistakes.
> It’s not exaggeration to say that the web has set UIs back by decades.

These claims always seem to break down once you ask for concrete examples.

1. The React/JS code is far simpler and less clunky than the Objective-C equivalent.

2. The HTML commandfor/command is declarative and simple unlike Objective-C target/selector

Paste the HTML commandfor snippet from TFA and ask an LLM what the Objective-C equivalent. If you think it's less clunky, go ahead and paste it here for us to judge. ;)

> It required several screenfuls of obscure and brittle code.

Yet still better than the brittle, obscure horrors of the procedural Objective-C Cocoa apps I used to have to work on.
Very telling what he said on The Joe Rogan Experience, that he has found things that are so jaw dropping that he can't point them out because it would get him killed.

But then he has some young nerds with no history dealing with that "sensitive" information putting them in a place where they can then extort those people, or sell that information to others.

That it would then go against the cause, because it would stop his important work, he said.

So I wonder how he's treating Republicans with dirt on their hands, if the then gives them a pass, "for the cause".

Because the real thing he should be doing would then to anonymously blow the whistle on them in such a way that it can't be traced back to him. I'm not sure if he'd do that, even if it's what "the people" he's working for, that is, the American taxpayers, deserve. And he says he's doing it all for them.
Futo Keyboard is pretty good: https://keyboard.futo.org/
oh these are super interesting - i've never seen magnets in the len's before. thanks for sharing.
Thanks for the rational reply.

Totally agree, Congress must reduce spending.

They had to increase the spending cap because we will be bouncing off it soon.

The history of Republicans is not good when it comes to reigning in spending. Neo-cons are just as bad as Democrats and some Democrats actually reduced spending. So, this shouldn't be such a tribal issue.
that's the only way for MI300X. It's not a PCI card...
Keep in mind I am not using GLP-1s myself because I am unsure of the long term risks.

What worries me is if what if in 20 years of use, something with insulin gets blown out?

There is a chance it could be a drug for life like testosterone. We know though how devastating obesity is on health so it is really going to be up to the individual to take the risk. Not really my business at that level.
Paul Gra...hum...
That’s why I mentioned capital gains reform.
I'd love to speak with you, especially given that you've already tried multiple test Rx's. Email me at jbornhorst [at] gmail.com if interested?
> I agree with you. I’m very pro-privacy/anti-surveillance and pro-freedom, so I’m entirely against the invasive ID-based systems, but the problem you highlight is pretty real and has to be addressed somehow, and I’m just not sure what the solution is.

The solution is client-side filtering/blocking software on the machines you own. And if your response is "but that's hard", that should increase your confidence that server-side filtering and verification are unacceptable. If even tech-savvy people can't get verification working on a local device-- which has the full, correct context who is using it and what should be blocked-- then certainly it's not going to get any better by mandating a solution at scale on the public Internet, where there is much less context about the individual user, credentials can be mocked, proxies can be used, and so on.
> It would be a hell of a flex to write a complicated script though, then comment out everything that wasn't absolutely necessary and just leave the simple necessities.

"Reviewer note: The submission ignores best the practice of writing self-documenting code, and included too many comments"
Horrible. We're going to end up with three separate languages: CSS, HTML, and Javascript, which will each be turing-complete programming languages with completely-overlapping featuresets, and there will be no clear reason to use one over the other.

Browsers will have to implement support for three PL runtimes. Everything will be complicated and confused.
It's not out of nowhere, exactly. It received some notoriety around 2006, when they were mentioned in "The Omnivore's Dilemma". He was particularly noting the differences between omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, and how corn products (including corn oil) were a huge fraction of the American diet.

But the idea that they're poison... that's been a crank issue for a while. Nobody else heard of it until we put a crank in charge.
This article is new, but to be clear the disks started rotting within ~5 years of purchase, not just now after 20 years. The issue has been known for a long time, like in 2012:

> > Apparantly most releases from Warner Bros on HD-DVD have laser rot. I have many titles that just freeze in the middle of the movie. I thought it was a problem with my player, but I read on other forums that this is a manufacturing fault from the discs...

https://forum.lddb.com/viewtopic.php?p=10181&sid=5039399ce60...

https://forum.lddb.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=840

Or in 2015, where some forum users narrow down the year range and manufacturing code:

> > It seems like the problematic discs were produced from 2006 to 2009 or so. I haven't found any DVDs from before or after those dates that exhibit these problems (even the original DVDs I bought in December of 2000 still look and play perfectly).

https://nitrateville.com/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=20399&sid=3238...

If you buy a monitor and it fails after a week of use, should you be SOL? If the failure is due to a manufacturing defect, and not the user's treatment of the product or just the expected lifespan of that product class, consumer protection laws should protect the consumer.
Suspicious Tesla Sales Surge Triggers Canadian Government Investigation
iMCP: An MCP server for your Mac Messages, Contacts, and more
1. Don't know where you live that the all-in costs on someone with a PhD are $4k-$7k/mo. Maybe if their PhD is in anthropology.

2. How many such PhD people can it do the work of?
Technically, sure. Practically, nobody's on schedule. I don't think Orion's delays absolve Starship's.
The order of adjectives in English is usually:

opinion, size, age or shape, colour, origin, material, purpose

It is sometimes difficult to classify adjectives this way, but "private" is probably opinion and "robotic" is probably purpose, so you are correct, "private robotic spacecraft" is probably correct.

The problem with English, of course, is that you can figure out what someone means, even if they jumble all their words up, most of the time.

I wonder if the standard of English composition has been reducing in journalism, over the past few years.
> instead do what Microsoft (thinks) it does best, and that's tooling, and enterprise products.

Definitely, but I think it's because they saw OpenAI's moat get narrower and shallower, so to speak. As the article mentions it's still looking like a longer timeline [quote] "but Microsoft still holds exclusive rights to OpenAI’s models for its own products until 2030. That’s a long timeline to unravel."
Would love to chat. Drop me a line at jbornhorst [at] gmail [dot] com and I'll coordinate times.
"*" is "0 or more" and "+" is "1 or more", it looks for any number of "e" or "i" at the beginning and at least one capital letter. The diagram below the regex is wrong.

Instead of

[ie]*-?[A-Z]+

it looks like they wanted

[ie]?-?[A-Z]
I remember a very simple experimental setup we did at my initial physics class, my university at the time was in construction (we didn't have equipped labs), with a result similar to the two slit experiment by shining a cheap laser at an angle on a cd/dvd. Something like this: https://www.reddit.com/r/Physics/comments/paqnya/doubleslit_...
> the right to "freedom from harm" immediately conflicts with speech, gun ownership

You don't have a right to "freedom from harm" if that means not hearing any speech you don't like.

You do have a right not to be shot, but "gun ownership" by itself does not conflict with that right. Being shot by someone who owns a gun does, but then the rights violation is the shooting, not the gun ownership.

> If you don't think there's a right to freedom from harm that competes with those other rights, I don't know what to tell you.

Your position, that all rights are inherently in conflict with each other, means nobody really has rights; what you call "rights" are really just at the mercy of the legislature:

> The real work of governance and legislation requires carefully negotiating trade-offs between competing priorities in an ever-changing world.

No, the real work of governance and legislation requires protecting the basic rights that everyone has to have to have a free, civil society, and stopping there. A government that has more power than that has too much power.

Your position reminds me of the old saying: no one's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session.

> The fact that positive rights are "leftist" in some parts of the world reflects a degree of deep ideological incoherence and immaturity in those parts, more than anything, I think.

It reflects a degree of deep ideological incoherence and immaturity on the part of leftists who advocate for such "positive rights", yes. That's a recipe for eternal conflict. Which is indeed what leftism of that variety leads to.
Good advice:

1. Never invade Russia in winter.

2. Make sure your robotic lunar lander has a low center of gravity.
Thank you! More features will be added in the future such as Midi output callbacks, however IEMidi does support running custom console commands with the addition of passing an optional numeric value to the command, and a tutorial on that will be posted in the near future.
For now. Enterprise cannot change in the time given after the license change notification without significant risk, and will happily pay to offset this risk, temporarily. This will last for 3-5 years, as suitable alternatives are evaluated and migration plans are implemented.
Media experts struggle to keep up with the latest in generative AI capabilities and shortcomings, educators are unfortunately far behind. School districts themselves even struggle to cut through propaganda in their official curricula. I think things are going to get a lot worse before they get better.
Does it not make sense to not tie your future to a third-party (aka build your business on someone else's platform)? Seems like basic strategy to me if that's the case.
I use terminal specifically to not need a mouse. I use a great many TUI tools, but this one is never going to be one of them.
> Your example proves my point. If there are no judges, the government has to let you go free.

That happens, you believe?
Never mind the prosecution, if you work on the hypothesis there probably is some government expenditure that is at least slightly unnecessary, the shitshow where DOGE look for the most obvious examples and end up bragging about saving money until someone points out that budget was spent last year or that the billion is actually a million or that maybe the people on probation due to recent promotions probably weren't the most dispensible employees, or oops, can we unfire the Ebola staff presents a surprisingly positive impression of how good actual auditors have been at weeding it out...
Awesome! Happy to take on your contributions
I had a problem with my previous pair of glasses. I think they were defective. I won't say where I got them, but it's a popular chain. My new pair is from a different optometrist. On paper, the exact same prescription, but my vision feels clearer. The new optometrist looked at my old pair and said it looked like the lens were somehow bent. So it can happen.
Regardless, undoing the Bush and Trump tax cuts that are the biggest part of why we have such a huge deficit in the first place—and which anyone who was paying attention knew would have that effect—would be the most obvious place to start.
Jam the toothpaste back in the tube: Asking employees to come back to the office
Presbyopia - the lens in our eyes begin to harden at age 40, making it harder for our eye muscles to "squeeze" the lens to focus. Presents itself as blurriness and eye strain. We usually encounter a change in our Rx during this time too, sometimes needing a weaker Rx (counterintuitively).

Would love to chat about your experience in any case. I'm at jbornhorst [at] gmail.com if interested.
The rules discussed in the article are not anywhere close to your straw man.
Sam Bankman-Fried Ramps Up Effort for a Pardon from Trump
We spend vastly more on projects on Earth, any way you measure. Time, money, manpower. The US Federal Govt spent $6.9 Trillion last year, Nasa's budget was $25 billion, so about 0.3% of spending.

https://www.planetary.org/space-policy/nasa-budget
How many el-crapo lawyers have pulled that stunt now (and been caught)?

Just take away the idiot's license to practice law. For life.

According to the ABA, America has more than 1.3M lawyers.
lmao it's hilarious when free folk talk about surveillance like cars on road aren't collecting data
would love to chat - i'm at jbornhorst [at] gmail [dot] com if you have 20-30 mins to spare.
> Which is redundant for most functions as they only have positional parameters.

Huh? This is not true.

def foo(a, b, c): ...

This can be invoked as either `foo(1, 2, 3)` or `foo(c=3, b=2, a=1)`:

>>> def foo(a, b, c):
... print(f"{a=}")
... print(f"{b=}")
... print(f"{c=}")
...
>>> foo(1, 2, 3)
a=1
b=2
c=3
>>> foo(c=3, b=2, a=1)
a=1
b=2
c=3
>>>
This is the epigraph of On Liberty:

“The grand, leading principle, towards which every argument unfolded in these pages directly converges, is the absolute and essential importance of human development in its richest diversity.”

— Wilhelm Von Humboldt, Sphere and Duties of Government
Being a dual citizen in any country you're subject to the laws and government regulations that are applicable on both countries unless an authority or a law responds you to a responsibility or any other implication it might have.

Henceforth you're subject to Lawsuits in both countries, Arrests in both countries by Any or All Agencies, but it also allow you to have a card under your sleeve, that you can surrender any one of them and stay legally in one anytime.

Also, if the two countries have extradition treaties you're subject to availability by one or both of the countries, if they require you on investigation.

In any of the case above happening sadly you can't request Asylum to the other as you're already their citizen. So, you're putting your self to be able to be extracted from foreign soil with or without permission in such a situation, I imagine.

As during war, there are a lot of things that are unstable, you might as well get away with it, if you choose to hide partial truth, based on the condition you're in. Also, I imagine then any paperwork of opposite country would not be valid in one country, unless they want to. Because war is deception, and your citizenship is stability on paper.
Our pricing model is being updated soon to be even more cost-effective. Currently, we support up to 10 pages per API request. With the upcoming token-based pricing, costs will drop significantly to just $1.40 per 1M tokens.
I don’t know what part of my response could possibly lead you to that conclusion
Project 2025 architect and current head of the office of management and budget said, on video:

We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected. When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains. We want their funding to be shut down so that the EPA can’t do all of the rules against our energy industry because they have no bandwidth financially to do so. We want to put them in trauma.
Most people get this after 40. Some people get it earlier.

Presbyopia: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/presbyopia/sy...

Presbyopia usually becomes noticeable in your early to mid-40s and continues to worsen until around age 65.

If you're much younger than 40, maybe google "early onset presbyopia".