skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I was taught to touch-type on a standard QWERTY keyboard at a very young age. I picked up an Ergodox EZ after nearly 20 years of that. It unfortunately took me at least a couple years before I was 100% again - probably 6 months to a year to get "used" to it and not mistype keys regularly.

They're worth it though!
Trolls that knowingly engage in bad arguments with flawed logic are going to be in shambles.
All the WMDs did was disgrace the media

It was the half dozen other adventures in the sandbox with nothing to show for it that made people put down their foot and say no more and stick to it even when it's a cause they may support (Ukraine for some, Israel for others). That's how fed up with it the American public is.
They lost their families in a plane crash – then came the online hate
Man that's crazy, wonder if any stock traders use this data to make predictions or futures
You will certainly find some unique experiences from hacklabs/hackerspaces. Also, please do not hesitate to ask about residencies or other short-term accomodation possibilities. It might not be the luxury resort, more likely a sofa, kitchenette and shower next to the actual lab.
Well said — completely true in my experience. It’s called Engineering Manager for a reason!
I know this. And you know this. Do you honestly think Musk's dwindling hate platform is going to be able to hold the propaganda illusion while Trump tariffs F the economy?
Presumably the trade war that has begun: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/donald-trump/trump-updates-...
Who says they'll invade by 2027? Some Washington think tank?
Not to be snarky, but I grew up in ChesCo, and could've sworn there were donation centers way back even in the 90's, near KoP and West Chester.

https://www.giveapint.org/ Locations in Pottstown/Exton, plus St Luke's Hospital

Red Cross, lots coming up: https://www.redcrossblood.org/give.html/drive-results?dt=WB:...

Supposedly CHOP has locations too. They do wonderful work.
or the CEO of Franz, Inc. as an advisor, it seems.
The worst that would happen is that the forks don't stay updated. They won't stop working. It's pretty easy to evade the blocks on sites that are poorly designed/managed enough that they feel it's necessary to block certain browsers.
If you're into the VR space you can use the Amethyst software to let it do body tracking without the hassle of slimeVR.

Still no finger tracking, but at least it can see your legs and arms move normally.
On a daily basis here on HN, capitalists and libertarians and others with the SV mindset work hard to protect the narrative that their way is the best way.
Agreed. I think the article does a great job going into exactly that definition.
Does this work out of the box with Prisma?
From the paper:

> Frames ... are conceptual structures that capture the semantic and syntactic relationships underlying language. They are helpful in providing a structured semantic context
for understanding relationships between entities, enabling tasks like Machine Reading Comprehension and Information Extraction to be more accurate and contextually aware.
> They got germany to shut down their nuclear power plants

Huh, so do they have an earthquake machine that caused Fukushima? Quick, someone tell that Jews-Space-Laser-Congresslady!

(Fukushima happened a few days before a German state election. Merkel, ever the opportunist and fearing a loss to the Green Party, finally said "We should accelerate the nuclear shutdown". The Greens won anyway).
Show HN: Rewritely – Write better, faster, and more efficiently with Rewritely
Hello all,
I've developed Rewritely.app - an AI-powered writing tool that helps users refine, rephrase and improve their writing. Whether it's improving clarity, changing tone or making text more professional, the goal is to write better, faster, and more efficiently.

I developed the small app in parallel with Apple Intelligence, and now they're pretty much identical ;-)

How does the app differ from Apple's Intelliegence? I don't really know yet. ;-) There is maybe a niche through a “bring your own LLM” or a customizablity approach. Or do you have any ideas?

I am looking forward for your feedback.
Best
Henrik
He does mention rear-projection TVs.
I just want to say this is such a pivotal problem to solve in this era of aviation. Looking forward to the progress you all make here. If you need any help on the product or sales side, let me know!
Any department that is responsible for paying Elon Musk has a better chance than others that stand in his way. USAID was investigating musk and CFPB were in the way of his X Pay nonsense. He gets a lot of money from the DoD so if anything they will have their budget increased.
> The latest system transcribes the VHF control audio at about ~1.1% WER (Word Error Rate), down from a previous record of ~9%.

I'd be curious about what happens when the ASR fails. This is not the place to guess or AI-hallucinate. As a pilot, I can always ask "Say Again" over the radio if I didn't understand. ASR can't do that. Also, it would be pretty annoying if my readback was correct, but the system misunderstood either the ATC clearance or my readback and said NO.
Not everything is for sale, especially at this ridiculous price. Why would you think the taiwanese people are so poor that they would all betray their country for 100k?
Pierre: A New Git Platform
I'm not tech-savvy but with in hrs I could buy a illegal knives on social media
> The syntax is also not very friendly IMO.

Very true. There's an alternate syntax for OCaml called "ReasonML" that looks much more, uh, reasonable: https://reasonml.github.io/
See "Yes, you can time the market!, Ben Stein, Phil DeMuth, Wiley 2003" for a simple and actually investable method simply looking at the S&P500 index. The main problem with it being that it's a very long term method - that would test the patience of most.
HumT DumT: Measuring and controlling human-like language in LLMs
Beautiful examples - reminds me of some art.

It makes me wonder how much of technology is driven by the need to look cool.
The MacBook Air (2008)
I don't want to be the one sitting in a Waymo when it decides to clusterfuck up traffic.
Thanks!
Syncing PG to another data store like Algolia or Elastic is just a very common use case that I use to pitch the idea. But Change-Data-Capture can be used for much more: emitting events when data changes, transforming data, caching data...

All of those use cases are really painful with raw table-level events.
You assume that if it's not rational to start a war they would not start it.

People in Ukraine and EU did the same mistake. Wars can start for no reason or for bogus "fake news" reasons. E.g. US can attack, say, Canada, at any time, there's no fundamental law of nature to prevent that.
https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/science/usgs-eros-archive-... has all of the unclassified US government satellites.
I had to learn what a "frame" is to understand this. https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/ is useful (FrameNet is the collection of 1,000 frames used in the paper).

An example of a frame is an "Event" - https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/fnReports/data/frameIndex... - where:

> An Event takes place at a Place and Time.

So if you're extracting frames from a piece of text, that's one of the concepts you might be trying to identify - along with what the place and time are.
There is no scenario possible in which china invades taiwan and "surprise" is involved. In ukraine it took months for russia to prepare at the border.
What would it take for the Republican congress to consider impeaching him and Vance? Trump sending military aid to Russia? Crashing the economy? Defying the courts?

We might actually find out at this rate.
Yes, obviously, but more commodities than stocks.
If you have spent time in academia, this concept is ever present.

Somehow all the academics in a particular field all over the world just happen to agree on a narrow set of ideas to explore next.

Most of science happens like this, yes even the Newtons and Einsteins of the world explored ideas in this narrow frontier of next ideas. There used to be exceptions in the distant past but modern science does not tolerate exceptions.
You also have https://cryptohack.org/
wow! the design is so simple. if you were selling this, I would be throwing my money at you right now!!
I agree with your overall description of creation. But I do not agree that generative models are something else entirely. They are tools, and while their affordances do influence what people do with it, in the end the responsibility is on the creator. You can make "soulless shit" or "thoughtful commentary" or anything else you put your mind to, by using these tools in combination with all the existing ones.

Models that are oriented around one-shot, text-only direction are pretty limiting in creative flow. This will hopefully continue to improve.
> Top gov officials is jews

Hard to imagine why you get labelled antisemitic
The ocean doesn’t stop anyone. If you don’t believe, have a look at the southern border.
> 1. Reducing dev friction.

This is so important, my managers who didn't code pretended things weren't too bad and took a "just deal with it" attitude whenever I proposed going for a QoL improvement.
New infections in animals should heighten concern of human H5N1
Can the CIA overturn elections?
Yes, but still splintered into a bunch of different conglomerates.

KTM has the motorcycle brand, but it's going through it's own restructuring/bankruptcy at the moment.
Russian army has plenty of combat experience. Russian weapons were export product and are battle tested.

China has none of that.

Russia brought soldiers from the far east to fight. How eager do you think Chinese will be to kill their fellow people in Taiwan? The communist government is not branding them as a enemy.
Someday, you'll even be able to "click and play" what you just watched. This will help narrow which adhoc game mechanics are most viable or durable.
that's weird, usually they let you verify other ways by showing tax returns or something.

At one point for Verizon I had to prove I did 1099 work for a company and had to show bank deposits from the LLC! (With amounts redacted).
You say the whole topic requires a lot of nuance and shouldn't be simplified and I say (while agreeing with you in the general case) there is no nuance when it comes to relieving a person from suffering. I get you've witnessed suicides that shouldn't have happened [1], but I had to watch a close relative of mine be in a state of excruciating pain for weeks while slowly dying from cancer. No drugs would help her. She lay there, first screaming, then begging to die, then when the agony became unbearable she'd lie there in between consciousness and unconsciousness, unable to perceive so much of it. From time to time her mind would clear up and I'd see the immense pain in her eyes. The country I'm from doesn't allow euthanasia even in such extreme cases. In that moment, I hated the doctors so much — despite knowing their hands were tied. Even more, I resented the society that would prohibit helping someone in such a state due to its idealistic views of the value of life — views that had never been exposed to the horrors I'd seen.

Perhaps you'd argue this too was a case of the medical system failing the person, but I believe that, lacking the knowledge or technology to truly help someone whose illness has progressed so far, we must help as much as we can, even if it means living with the thought of taking someone's life.

Sorry for the stream of consciousness; I don't know how to wrap this up.

[1]: I say as if there are suicides that should happen. ._\
> This waste could have been avoided, is the thing, and anyone who cared about running and knew how to run an organization well, might have.

Sure, by not having the vacant offices in the first place. Different ways to achieve that goal include: not allowing huge numbers of employees to stop coming into the office; or if you do allow that, by then competently following up on the implied reduction in office usage.

There are clearly lots of ways to avoid this kind of waste, but all of them go back for years, and were not done. So here we are. And instead of being critical of that, you're choosing to fixate on the most recent events, where someone is actually discovering and fixing the underlying problem.
doesn't sound very efficient to me
What makes self-emissive "technically infinite" but not DLP?

I would say the weak point of DLP is the screen material needing to be light-friendly, but that's on a sliding scale with the emissive display, not a hard line difference. Both of them preserve black levels when turning on, unlike traditional LCD, but also it isn't true black for either of them.
Even during the Jobs era there was a good/better/best inside of there. The first iMac had good/better/best configs. It's just that Apple became so big that the best sometimes became a completely different machine, with its own good/better/best!
> If my attitude puts you off from dialog, then might I politely suggest you educate yourself more on these topics before engaging?

Here we go again with the condescending attitude.

> your singular viewpoint

I don't push a singular viewpoint. I asked a question which other people have answered. Some people agreed and others disagreed. Each to their own. This is how a healthy debate works.

> At best your question was uninformed to the point that it constitutes provocation, at worst it was deliberate disinformation.

Asking a question about a major event and having a debate with other people is now considered a provocation? May I suggest you take a step back and rethink how you interact with other people if you think truly that this is the case.

Questioning things is good. Asking questions when we don't know the answer about something should be encouraged. That's how we learn and that is how we grow.

You have decided that you are right and that I am wrong. That's your right but that shouldn't stop people from asking questions that you deem to be provocative.

I have had many debates with plenty of people on this forum, some heated debates even, but I can say that you are definitely not someone I am interested in engaging with anymore.

Goo day to you.
I have a keyboardio Model 100 and it does have symbols on it. Available in mac, windows, and blank iirc.
MASM was always horrible.

nasm has been lovely, but I haven't used in 10+ years. https://github.com/netwide-assembler/nasm
"All the spices", save for tea, coffee, and sugar, which continued to be imported in quantity. And are addictive to boot.

A century or so later, laudenum.

The spice trade itself didn't shrink so much as it was subsumed by other trade, I think, particularly as shipping capacity, reliability, and safety increased.
Confidental Federated Analytics by Google
I'm not sure I'm ready to accept the fact that having rights restricted is a body autonomy issue outside of being in solitary confinement. I commented in a different thread about "exigent conditions" which sometimes can trump personal liberties or even body autonomy when the "greater good" is concerned. If I'd entertain your statement as being on topic, I'd say that national measures in a global pandemic fit that.
Yeah, "Terminal-based AI coding retard" is unnecessary.
Time for smartphone makers to ship verified video capture
"Democracy depends on free speech, separation of powers, and smartphone camera design.

[...]

These technologies are tied together in a chain of trust, such that each layer verifies the next. In iOS systems, this chain begins with the Boot ROM, which is a piece of unchangeable code that is the first code to run each time the system starts. Each of the later pieces of software that are loaded are signed in a way that can be verified by the previous layer. So the Boot ROM can verify the bootloader’s signature, which can then verify the OS kernel signature, which can verify extensions and device drivers, etc. The real way it works has further protections and complexities, but this is the basic scheme.

[...]

Wouldn't it be great if smartphones became unassailable sources of truth?"
Can I get in touch with you to ask more about your time leading teams? No contact info in your HN profile but if you’re interested, my email is in mine.
D such a fantastic language.
It does if you are using PG (other SQL databases will be added later).
Under the hood, PG-Capture listens to raw Postgres events, it does not matter if the data was updated via an ORM (like Prisma), raw SQL, or even a developer's IDE...
As an investor, I don't. But your point was about rising hardware prices, and services subsidize the hardware if anything by the mechanism you mention.
https://archive.is/GVwhR
I don't see how "greater good" justification is any different between my example and the topic.
Right. They don’t Trust Putin but they trust Trump. If Trump acts on Putin’s agenda, they will vote for it and call it smart.
Academia is cultish (strict hierarchy, a sense of calling for the profession, long hours and minimal pay for "juniors", non-academic careers, even when well compensated, considered inferior, etc.).

I spent ~15 years in academia between PhD, post-docs, and prestigious fellowships. I have never heard anybody saying they wanted a tenure-track job because of the institution of tenure (thousands of post-docs have objectively no chance of landing a tenure-track job, and they are not even looking outside of the ivory tower) or because after getting the job, they cannot be fired. That's a huge misrepresentation of the motives of the vast majority of academics.

"I'm saying maybe without tenure as a carrot we'll go from 200 applicants for each job to something more reasonable like 30-50." - I don't know the answer, but I would bet one would see 190 applicants instead of 200.
"Is not allowed", lol.
None of the nln funded projects have gotten anywhere. I don't know why that is
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_ML
The idea of spider webs in space was explored long before, in the second century AD, by Lucian of Samosata in his _Ἀληθῆ διηγήματα_ or "True Stories." Spiders run webs from the sun (land of the Heliots) and the moon (the Selenites) so that a vast space battle can be waged on a plain between them.
> There are clearly lots of ways to avoid this kind of waste, but all of them go back for years, and were not done.

What waste? The offices? Filling them doesn't reduce the waste.

No, the waste is lost hours of productivity, and chaos making these offices less efficient. You solve that by rolling this out very differently. The waste I'm talking about is entirely avoidable and 100% DOGE's fault.

[EDIT]

> where someone is actually discovering and fixing the underlying problem.

What underlying problem? This 1) didn't need to be done, and even if that weren't true, 2) was done in a hamfisted way that wasted money.
This is precisely why intermittent sources aren't viable without a breakthrough in energy storage. Existing storage mechanisms aren't capable of delivering at the tens to hundreds of terawatt hour scale required to make intermittent sources viable.

Remember, 66.8 TWh of electricity is used daily. Intermittent sources don't just experience daily fluctuations, but seasonal fluctuations lasting days or weeks. Even 12 hours of storage would still leave us with periods of insufficient production multiple orders of magnitude more frequent than the status quo: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26355-z
Love the idea in theory and would like such a tool to exist, but the use cases they present aren't convincing. This would be useful in much more specific cases like drafting contracts, laws or technical documentation: places where unusually precise language without corner cases is mutually desired by everyone, and the set of fallacies that occur is small and specific.

This paper doesn't target such use cases. Instead it's trying to tackle "pop misinformation" type claims, mostly related to climate change. Unfortunately the Logic and LogicClimate datasets that the paper are using as a benchmark have serious problems that should disqualify them from being considered a benchmark. If we check the paper that introduced them, Jin et al open by asserting that "She is the best because she is better than anyone else" is an example of circular reasoning. It's actually a tautology. Then they try again with "Global warming doesn’t exist because the earth is not getting warmer" which is also not circular reasoning, it's another tautological restatement (you may say it's false, but disagreement over facts isn't a disagreement over logic - if either clause is true so is the other). Circular reasoning often involves a mis-definition and would be something like this real-world example from a few years ago:

1. A positive test is means you have COVID.

2. Having COVID is defined as having a positive test.

Their second example is "Extreme weather-related deaths in the U.S. have decreased by more than 98% over the last 100 years ... Global warming saves lives" which they classed as "false causality" (they mean non-sequitur). My experience has been that climate skeptics are surprisingly logical so this would be an odd statement for them to make, and indeed if we check the original Washington Times op-ed then we find Jin et al are engaging in malicious quoting. It actually says:

> "Contrary to sensational media reports, extreme weather-related deaths in the U.S. have decreased more than 98% over the last 100 years. Twenty times as many people die from cold as from heat, according to a worldwide review of 74 million temperature-related deaths by Dr. Antonio Gasparrini and a team of physicians. Global warming saves lives."

The saves lives claim is based on cold being more dangerous than heat. Warmer weather = fewer deaths from cold isn't a logical fallacy, which is why they had to delete that part to make their example. It might sound like a weird or disingenuous argument to you, but it's logical in the sense that an SMT solver would approve of it. If you disagree it's probably due to prior beliefs e.g. that perhaps extreme weather has increased even as society got orders of magnitude better at reducing the impacts, or perhaps the positive effects of warmer air on the elderly are offset by other effects of climate change, or that the future will be different to the past due to compounding effects. Such rebuttals aren't identifications of a logical fallacy though, just of different priors that could maybe be addressed with additional rounds of debate.
Sure, with several hundred hours to spare one can make some songs in a DAW. Now one can make something as good/bad in maybe 1/10x the time. Or, given the same time investment, one can possibly make something better!
Let's not forget that extraordinary musical talent tends to be the result of MASSIVE exposure to music as a toddler. It isn't entirely a question of DNA or effort. They start by emulating what they hear, over time they might evolve their own style, or they may not. In other words, you are less likely to become an extraordinary musical talent if you weren't saturated with music before you started going to school. Nobody finds it problematic when a musical star is performing way beyond their age, even though he/she essentially is engaging in deliberate mimicry to a much larger extent than an AI usually would be.

Are you saying that it is wrong for a machine to learn? Even if it was, it is the massive amount it is based on that makes it less problematic, as that makes room for building abstracted knowledge.
Happy if it helps! Feel free to share your feedback here or on GitHub once you do!
I for one am prepared for our evolution into the Ousters.

If you haven't read the Hyperion Cantos by Dan Simmons, go read it. It's worth it.

https://hyperioncantos.fandom.com/wiki/Ousters
Depends on who wrote it. My own Perl code, and plenty I've seen, is extremely clean and readable; sadly, a lot isn't. I'm sure clean and readable C++ exists, but the stuff I have to work with - big codebases with tons of history - is not. "Terrifying" would be more apt in most cases.