skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Lord of War is a bit tricky on that front. It seems to glorify the whole mess of international semi-licit arms trading and the people who do it (Cage's character), but under that what it really demonstrates is a man falling ever deeper into sad loneliness in between mostly hollow successes straddling a moral abyss. He resigns himself, almost through inertia, to continuing his business simply because by the end, he really has nothing else and knows how to do nothing else, trapped in a life now devoid of deeper warmth or meaning.

The movie is bleakly depressing under its mockingly glorified surface shine.
Exactly. It picks a single assembler:

> Currently, all supported targets follow the assembly code syntax used by LLVM’s internal assembler which usually corresponds to that of the GNU assembler (GAS)

Uniformity like that is a good thing when you need to ensure that your code compiles consistently in a supported manner forever. Swapping out assemblers isn’t helpful for inline assembly.
‘Sic transit’ is probably the Latin tag you want here.
And that kids is why we translator is a profession (and not an algorithm). AI is attempting itself on it, but is at least three steps away from it (finding a really suitable word, rewriting the whole paragraph to fit this word contextually, considering the whole article to make sense).

Same as with code right now.
So it’s tied to biometrics/other 2nd factor as with passkeys. Wouldn’t stop mini-me of course…
> Well, first you’d need every worker in the factory—I mean, the tech company—to be a predictable, consistent cog in that machine. Then you’d need to be able to measure their performance.

That's part of the problem from what I've noticed. Engineers performance is not measured against the application of computer science as much as how much they add value to the business in the short term... since in the long term there is strong indication that good engineering always adds value (i.e. by reducing bugs, making software more performant, more reliable, etc).

I have no sources but I think it's easy to see that bad software costs companies a ton of money and it also makes or breaks a lot of startups, and one symptom of this is how engineers get yearly reviews that are based on soft skills, how many other people you manage, or how good of a job you did communicating the project status and planning.

It seems to me the business side of companies takes over the entire culture of the company and everyone needs to think in terms of customer needs and whatever makes profit... but ironically this may be leading to poor engineering practices that are hard for engineers to deal with because they have different kinds of priorities and a different kind of mindset.
Get checked for keratosis? Prescription lenses make certain assumption about the shape of your eye. Keratosis means your eye is a slightly wonky shape and doesn't fit the "spherical with cylindrical astigmatism" model, so a lens won't correct your vision properly.

Does the problem persist with contact lenses? Soft contact lenses can do a better job of correcting vision for someone with keratosis, as they conform to the wonky surface of the cornea.

Edit: Just realised you're probably doing market research rather than asking for yourself. Either way, people with keratosis, who don't fit into the box, might be something to consider.
Will this work alongside Citus?
If yes, what benefits/disadvantages would it have? I presume at some point of time workloads do need a cluster.
250 _meters_, this is science not javascript.
I haven’t had the need for super complicated regexes, but ChatGPT and Claude both worked fine to generate a regex to extract markdown code blocks.
I wrote a small thing for adding a `#doc List.find` directive. However, I don't maintain it anymore since I think it doesn't see much use and it's work to keep up on OCaml compiler internals changes (and it's my impression it never picked up much adoption). https://github.com/reynir/ocp-index-top

dbuenzli's down also has a similar feature.
Because we, no matter how arrogant, cannot predict the future. Putin could have a heart attack. He might be assassinated by an insider. The soldiers may even decide the war isn't worth fighting.

Putin is not a God, he is a man. The circumstances of that are extremely unpredictable.
This is levels above terrorism. Remember the good times when it was sold as prescription drug in pharmacies?
Funny thing is Tripod, Angelfire, and 50megs are all still around, just no one bothers with them anymore.
Xerox made more off PARC's laser printer patent than the entire PARC budget. Plus they invented the modern desktop UI, and ethernet.
> What language does this?

SQL injection, for one. For once, not PHP (thankfully).
Data is also stored in the local filesystem. How does that compare with vanilla PG and/or S3 based storage?
> As long as that is the case, it is impossible to mandate uniform syntax. The language certainly can't standardize externally-specified code either. I bet you can't customize this in Rust.
Different assemblers, even for the same arch, support different features and instructions, and may use different syntax. So requiring uniformity is a non-starter.

You’d be wrong. You can customize the build however you want by defining a build.rs file. For inline assembly I don’t see a problem with uniformity and not supporting weird shit. Weird shit should be harder if it makes the more straightforward stuff easier and less error prone.
Just added an Apache License
Trackball predates the mouse though and things wouldn't have been very different if we only had them.
DMD v2.110.0 has been released
The good fellas at DLang community posted a new release of DMD compiler. This has been made possible after heavy work of 8 months.

In the meantime the community is growing strong with more software released and more and more members joining.
when are you guys at chrome planning to add a virtual scroller or virtual list or virtual table. pretty sure every infinite scrolling pattern out there could use a component like this
So much fun.
What? Where do you live in Germany? They are all over the place!
Location: Berkeley, CA, USA

Remote: Yes (Preferred but also open to hybrid)

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: TypeScript/JavaScript, Python, Go, React, Express.js, GraphQL, React Three Fiber, Vite, PyTorch, TensorFlow, PySpark

Resume: https://newtrino.ink/Resume.pdf

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nishanth-jayram/

Email: nishanthjayram@gmail.com

About Me:
- Developer with experience in machine learning, data science/engineering, and full-stack development

- Currently at Mastercard, where I've worked on developing a recommendation system to match cardholders with personalized merchant offers

- Built models to handle transaction/redemption forecasting

- Developed internal dashboards to visualize model performance metrics, combining full-stack and data science capabilities

- Looking for a front-end or full-stack role, though also open to DS/ML roles

In my spare time I like to play guitar, photograph birds, and watch old episodes of Carl Sagan's Cosmos.
I've been gray for over a decade and get carded every time, because my state tries to enforce age restrictions.

Minors don't seem to have much of a problem, though?
"Whoever he is, he's very cunning and won't do anything to atract attention and we'll never figure it out." ... Richard Priar the lowly data entry drone rolls up to the front door of the building in a lambo with a huge painting in the passenger seat...
Democracy is non-negotiable
imagine what a fancy office with state of the art wallpapers, furniture and state of the art robotic coffee making machines you could add to your office with $130M funding
As recommended elsewhere in this thread, EyeBuyDirect is quite good if you have enough knowledge to specify your own glasses and fitting. They are owned by upstream BigLens™, so lens quality is comparable to many opticians, with low pricing since they make their margin on frames. If you need custom fitting height for one of their frames, you can measure and return after receiving the glasses, then they will remake a new pair for free within 14 days of receiving the first pair.
I keep my personal stuff off my work machines specifically because I'll be handing them back intact. If you've done some work on that machine but not saved it anywhere else it's still company property and wiping the machine is destroying it. No one is likely to give you trouble over it unless they go looking for something you supposedly had, but if they wipe it instead of me there's no risk of a misunderstanding.

This is good practice anyway, if your laid off or fired unexpectedly, likely your going to be locked out of your machine without notice and without opportunity to clean up.
I mean if you go in between the two you find folks happily enjoying the appetite suppressing side effects of low dose stimulants and some antidepressants.
The problem with LLMs is that they do what you tell them to do.

If you ask the LLM to translate something without context, it will translate without context, and the result will quite likely be incorrect. If you provide some context, the result will likely be better. And if you tell the LLM what you are actually trying to say, the result will often be even better.

In this case, the issue was that "speed bump" did not actually mean a speed bump. It was used in a figurative sense, as a cultural idiom. If you tell that to the LLM, it should be able to suggest better ways to express the same idea in other languages.
That's odd. Most optometrists I've seen over my life (and specifically here in Canada, BC) will keep trying to adjust and ask you if it's sharper or not before they settle on the numbers. They'll go higher or lower power and/or astigmatism in different increments. They're also generally pretty cool with things like testing with a laptop monitor and getting the sharpest computer prescription.

Maybe this is your sweet spot?
Why does it have fruit on the bottle then?
This. 1p is polished and easy to use. Bitwarden is as functional as 1P but janky.
The "Gulf of America" in Google Maps is really going to pay some dividends for the company.
Remember when people used to be like "don't just post it on your blog, post it on medium that way if your blog goes down it'll still be available to everyone" lol
Ah why do I forget about that?
Thanks for the reminder.

I also found movitz:

- https://github.com/dym/movitz

- https://github.com/karlosz/movitz

- https://github.com/PuercoPop/Movitz

But couldn't build it. My Lisp-Fu isn't good enough.
What percentage of people do you think know that the air inside of a parking garage is carcinogenic?
In context learning, learning via training. Both are things we barely understand the mechanism of.

RAG is a basically a perfect example to understand the limits of in context learning and AI in general. It's faults are easier to understand but the same as any AI vs AGI problem.

I could go on but CL is a massive gap of our knowledge and likely the only thing missing to AGI.
PHP understands this properly:

var_dump( "null" == null );
// bool(false)
yep. 1d is a rule of thumb. My optometrist is cool with me bringing my laptop and measuring at the distance I feel is best for me.
> (e.g. judges being forced to practice law at gunpoint).

We have that (compulsory jury duty).
> Concepts are usable today. Modules are basically usable but immature.

Concepts are usable in the sense they compile. Claiming they are usable in terms of being ergonomic and that people are willing to use them outside the stdlib is a stretch. You think it seems reasonable until you encounter Rust traits and then you wonder wtf is C++ doing.

As for modules, it’s now 5 years since standardization. How much more time does a basic feature like that take to mature? Btw, the community provided feedback to the standards committee that the spec was useless for anyone building build systems tooling around it and the committee chose to ignore that warning and this is the result.

> I know in the case of Google especially, there were many people who got into a spat with the rest of the committee because they had a different vision of what was appropriate for the language. That is a sign that the committee is functioning correctly. It's supposed to prevent a single actor from ignorantly breaking stuff for others. You might disagree with the particular decision that was made, but I think the committee is rarely given the benefit of the doubt that it deserves.

The committee was actually given a lot of benefit of the doubt after c++11 because they promised to change. They’ve squandered it.
Particularly after moving from Penistone.
Wine 10.3 (Dev) – Run Windows Applications on Linux, BSD, Solaris and macOS
A fun fact I learned recently, after years of casually skimming color science, is that our eyes cannot focus the entire visual spectrum at once.

That’s why our cone response to the spectrum looks like https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cone_cell#/media/File%3ACone... instead of having cleanly segregated red vs. green responses. If it was segregated, we could only focus on red or green but not both. By having a heavy overlap, we can get a sharp focus on yellow. And, the visual system makes the full spectrum work by deriving the red vs. green concepts from the difference between the two cone responses. Blue focus is accepted as a necessary sacrifice.
You're talking about the syntax of the assembly code itself. In practice small variations between assemblers isn't much of a problem for inline assembly in the same way it would be for standalone .s sources, because inline assembly rarely has implementation-specific directives and macros and such. It's not like the MASM vs NASM split.

This thread is about the compiler-specific syntax used to indicate the boundary between C and assembly and the ABI of the assembly block (register ins/outs/clobbers). Take a look at the documentation for MSVC vs GCC:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/assembler/inline/asm?v...

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html

Rust specifies the inline assembly syntax at https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/inline-assembly.html in great detail. It's not a rustc extension, it's part of the Rust language spec.
How about changes that doesn't make number better? Just create a dead-end branch?
I got new prescription glasses recently and they cause some eye strain.

The prescription is about the same as my old glasses, 12 years apart, perhaps they are dialed in just a little bit too much.

The other thing is that these glasses have blueguard filter, which I have been attributing the eye strain to. I've been looking for a way to remove the blue guard, but I can't and I don't want to spend A$400 on a new pair. :(
I'm starting to come to the idea that the rate of progress is more driven by the rate of adoption than by number of researchers.

It takes a whole lot of implementation and organisation to make any innovation tangible, so in some ways a bigger overall society slows things down as much as you gain from the total number of researchers.

Competition from foreign societies is also a part of this.
That's fascinating and makes me ponder my interactions (in English) with Germans.

I believe even though this trait does not feel proper in written English, it's somewhat common in spoken English, if you interpret the comma as a stulting of rhythym and tone.
Your body, your choice.

At least with cigarettes there was a public nuisance argument because of the smell and also the secondhand effect. I dont find general public health a compelling argument for restricting sugar.
You said "scientists" and "health administrators". I know what a "scientist" is and I know what a "health administrator" is. My son is working out how tenuous his biochem PhD offers are right now, which is pretty nerve-wracking. For obvious reasons, I take you to be saying he should be "getting wiped out". Fine, just so we're clear what you're saying.
Isn't this more of a cultural thing, that Germans seem to agree that it is authoritative and use it as a reference?

I'm not sure what would even make a dictionary prescriptive other than an explicit declaration that it is so or, ridiculously, a law declaring the same.
Oh my gosh. Everyone can always do better, but also, has no one else here had to use Microsoft Teams recently?
Would love to read this if a link is still around
Oh god, I’m genuinely happy I didn’t google this book before bedtime. I hope the misery life will throw at me today will be bad enough to wipe the memory of what I read before I go to sleep tonight!
Rumble strips are a different thing, designed to guard against inattention. They can be related to speed control, but need not be.
There is a moat in the brand they're building.

Look at Coca Cola, Google, both have plausible competitors, zero switching cost but they maintain their moat without effort.

Being first is still a massive advantage. At this point they should only strive to avoid big mistake and they're set.
Ba dum tish. For real though, the complexities of dealing with human input are a good reason to never accept human input you aren't absolutely required to collect. Once you do, put it in a place that you will never have to touch it or process it again. There's no validation you can do on human inputs, so don't try beyond "are you sure?"
ETHZ and EPFL are also top of the market in EU/UK.
What do you call them then?
I don't even know why superintelligence is a goal. I'll be happy with a 120IQ digital being that handles all my busy work
This is great! It would be great if there were an API interface for integration into other systems.
Maybe make your layouts more flexible. There’s no reason in the speed bump example, why the word could not be broken into another line.
I am originally from north western Germany and they were everywhere, especially in 30km/h zones and play streets. We just called them Huckel and I never thought about an official term. I can not remember seeing any of them in Berlin though. Here they make you break by going left and right instead of up and down.
Unlike the standard ChatGPT experience, Deep Research thrives on complexity, offering multi-threaded analysis that connects the dots across vast datasets. Whether you’re dissecting academic literature, decoding market shifts, or weighing a big life decision, it promises to cut through the noise with precision. But as powerful as it is, this tool isn’t magic—it demands sharp prompts, critical oversight, and an understanding of its boundaries. Let’s dive into what makes Deep Research tick, how it stacks up against rivals, and where it’s headed next.
The main problem is that no one uses the word (which is already not well known) outside of the road context.
Huh. Y'know, until you suggested it, it hadn't occurred to me that the mobile app could be monetizable. That could at least explain why they did that; I thought it was odd.
Thanks for creating, really useful!

Would be nice with a [Download Combined Rendered] button to download a self-contained .html web page of the rendered combined page.
What are people using these OCR programs for? Are there really that many PDFs being made without embedded text these days?
But an SQL injection is an exploit. In SQL ‘Null‘ != Null
The CDA, COPPA, DMCA, GDPR and copyright directives were all predicted (hysterically) to destroy the Internet. Oops, it still exists.
Case in point: When Daimler and Chrysler merged, they had a law firm (with no other ties to either company) register the DaimlerChrysler domains weeks before the merger was made public.

I don’t recall if anybody noticed before they went public, but as this thread shows, today it would be noticed for sure.
> Benchmarking is the only thing you can really do in some cases.

I think the complete opposite! Benchmarking is very difficult to get right and in some situations you couldn't really make a benchmark to test what you're interested in improving. Reading assembly can be objective if you know or look up the instruction latency/throughput of each instruction (or you have a tool provide it) and you can also use loop throughput analyzers (as the other commenter mentioned) that will try to predict the typical throughput for a given loop.

IMO if you get used to looking at assembly it becomes obvious in the majority of cases whether there's performance left on the table.

And "simplicity" does not equal "faster". Although for cold code, reducing its impact on i$ and d$ of the rest of the system is probably smart, so sometimes speed is not the only factor.
To how many non-SWE members of your family could you say 'here is the Netflix password, you can decrypt it with gpg', and have them be like 'ah yes, let me just `man gpg` this will be no problem'?
I think at this point this has basically become an old man yells at cloud take. Folks ordering at Starbucks know exactly what they're getting down to the number of pumps. You've always been able to get any form of unadulterated coffee hot or cold. All the drinks are coffee, you can find the worker manual for Starbucks floating around online and it has all the drink recipes. And it's because coffee is crazy cheap, it would be more effort to fake it. Most of their desert drinks use espresso pulls as the base coffee flavor.

It's hard to work around the fact that coffee, dairy, and sugar taste really good together. Coffee really wants to be a dessert, it's why it's in so many of them. Starbucks just rolled with that and people love it.
The author is not affiliated with Google. Is this from "external" contributors?
If such a thing called open-source is still happening here, I would send all of my respect to you the people who do it for the Web.
I thought about adding an API interface for it. It is on my to-do list of things that could be good to add. For now, I'm gathering feedback to see what people like about it or not.
Given that “come to” means “regain consciousness”, this pair sounds like it should be about thread sleep control.
What is a liquid lens? The tech that could revolutionize phone cameras (2021)
Gently, I'd ask you to consider reading both mine, and his, comments with some more grace, whether it be theirs with charity, or mine with respect for what I mean.

Their comment was absolutely not in bad faith.

With grace, I would say not everyone has as considered views as you do. That can make it challenging and frustrating to deal with because you know better.

It's worth showing them, or at least telling them, instead of discussing your opinion of their motivations for saying things, which we can agree is, at best, mind-reading among strangers in a textual format.
I would use then Hungarian instead, even more longer words =)
> but the top 10% ALREADY pay 76% of federal personal income taxes

Right, which comes out to, oh I don't know... say, 0 dollars if you're a billionaire?

These people have no income, they have wealth. The wealth is completely untaxable so long as it remains wealth. Which you can do, because the benefit of having wealth is you're given liquid money just by virtue of having that wealth. Meaning, you can infinitely take out loans and use said wealth as collateral. Probably your wealth is growing faster than the interest rate, too, so win-win: you also get free money.

Of course, OUR wealth, meaning the wealth most commonly held by the middle and upper middle class, single family homes, are taxable. We tax the unrealized gains on home equity all the time, it's called a property tax.

We have convinced the general population that the property tax is somehow not a wealth tax, and that it's actually good and they should be against wealth taxes. I mean, it's absolutely genius.
Yeah I mean that's all good stuff, but I just don't see mainstream consumers having a need for all of that. Barely anyone even has a desktop anymore.
Mostly, perhaps.

https://www.nokia.com/bell-labs/