skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's pretty funny. Doubling down on it may not pay off.

The first two landers have different backgrounds. The third and fourth re-use the first lander background in the same orientation and mirrored. I would think that since the third lander has a model displayed and the fourth is just a proposed outline that they may be open to structural changes by the fourth if they get that opportunity.

Hopefully they take the bait and pursue modifications that give their lander a lower center of gravity or a wider footprint. If I were at NASA I would be hesitant about allowing them to launch that third model with no mods. Even if all they do is hit the free section on craigslist in Houston and grab all the free-weights and a lightly used tarp to swing, testicle-style, underneath the lander as it tries to find the moon.
skyyler is refuting a comment that implies this is expected by mentioning that their own (non-defective) discs have lasted ~50 years and counting.
It's bizarre. These are the pricing setups that you'd see for a military-industrial contract. They're just doing it out in the open
Measeles incidence in the years prior to the introduction of the vaccine was not abnormally low. No idea where you got that "95%" number from but it's obviously a lie. Stop providing false information, when you can google the actual facts within seconds. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measles_vaccine#/media/File:Me...

Once the vaccine was introduced, cases fell off a cliff.

And yes, RFK is crazy.
That's concerning. I thought everyone knows that zone transfers should be generally disallowed, especially when coming from random hosts.
Nope. That's the difference, Democrats are actually allowed to dissent
But WB never made a claim about how long the DVDs should last when they were sold.

And would anyone have paid the extra money for a 20+ year warranty for some DVDs? Absolutely not.
Well maybe that should also be done if you want to be fair
Broadcom's handling of VMware after the acquisition has been poor. However Broadcom is an excellent company, a bit "forgotten" compared to Nvidia or TSMC
Do you have a link? I'd like to know which model that was.
If I'm not allowed to scan it into a PDF copy when I buy it, then I should be.
Trust and reliance on AI – Experimental study on extent, costs of overreliance
I am fine if structural stuff can be coded in HTML, while animations and bells and whistles will still have to be JS/CSS based
Consulting companies
>Jensen is super smart, business-savvy AND hard-working

Those traits are table stakes for running a Fortune 50 company. Before 2019 when the AI boom came out of nowhere, what was going on? Nvidia was an okay company, but not a real over-performer.
All this worry mongering about Trump / MAGA is just political ignorance.

As the oldest democracy in the world, with a deliberate 2 party system that is essentially ideologically similar, the US political system is quite resilient. Yes, a "deep state" or a "military-industrial complex" does have enormous influence over the country - but there's nothing truly insidious about it when you realise that it is a part of the US political system. It is somewhat undemocratic, but it still acts as one of the checks and balances of US political system to ensure the US remains a superpower (i.e. it only comes into picture on superpower politics). It is composed of the core of the US capitalistic system, whose leaders also have a lot of political influence. Both the US political parties understand that you need this "deep state / MIL complex" to continue to be a superpower, and so a US President is only ever allowed to freely exercise his democratic powers domestically (i.e. in America) and for routine foreign diplomacy. For anything else related to superpower politics, the President of the US does not have a free hand in any manner of speaking - it's a 100+ year old idea and institute that has ensured the US becomes the eminent (and now sole) superpower in the world.

And Trump is going to be a President only for a few years. (Again, note, by design - term limits in the US political systems ensure authoritarianism cannot flourish).

Moreover, many might not remember that once the US developed nuclear weapons during WW 2, with the help of British and other European scientists, it immediately expelled British scientists from its research labs and worked to deny this technology to the British. The British had to do their own research to create nuclear weapons. (But they still chose to be dependent on the US because they understand the value of alliances - it's always better to fight a war alongside someone, than alone). The delivery systems for nuclear weapons are much easier to create, especially when you have wealth and help from others (alliances). Even if by some rare and extraordinary fluke, the US explodes from within, the British can easily catchup.
Yeah, and that's also why regulators are making it harder and harder to acquire Monero (if you come from fiat), at least in the EU.
Yeah, the office suite is such a cash cow. It is polished, feature rich, and ubiquitous compared to alternatives and somehow has remained so for decades. And yet, I'm increasingly getting seriously concerned they are going to break it so badly I'll need to find an alternative.
I wondered if John Carmack would take his strong knowledge of low level hardware and interest in AI and work on this, but he seems to be working on a non LLM flavor of AI.
Department of Graft for Elon working exactly as designed.
I don’t think you have to go quite that far. NATO was intended to provide cover against the other superpower bloc in Europe. That superpower isn’t really a superpower anymore, but the remnant that legally succeeded it still has a lot of nukes.

Arguably in a world of superpowers, only superpowers have total sovereignty under your definition, hence why I said it was a sliding scale. 95% of any individual nation or most configurations of alliances you could technically (though maybe not plausibly) come up with would still get crushed by the French military in a mano a mano military conflict. They can defend themselves, but what if they have to defend themselves alone vs the United States, Russia, the PRC, or a medley of European great powers? NATO keeps them from having to go it alone, and NATO plus the EU takes a couple of those possibilities off the table, at least for a while, but in Charles de Gaulle’s time, France still had a colonial empire they were trying to keep together (and they still have a fair number of overseas territories outside of metropolitan France) and the plausibility of NATO keeping it together was all up in the air.

Throughout the duration of the Cold War, I don’t think you can make a winning argument that on balance the US was ever a bad ally, but as an old European leader, he was definitely right to be skeptical about the tradeoffs, and right to think that if France has more power, then it wouldn’t need to cede sovereignty or at least much sovereignty to all these newfangled international institutions popping up across Europe.
The life of Jan Marsalek would make for a good movie plot, but at the risk of glorifying the crimes he committed.
I say again, “Unfair” to him personally?

FOH 28 day old account with 6 karma.
"Hoping that technology can magically solve this without destroying privacy" seems to be where the Supreme Court is heading, at least that was what observers thought after watching the Court's hearing on the Texas bill a few weeks ago.

Which is one reason that the EFF is trying to lay down their argument that the technology won't work.
tr is surprisingly useful. If you're clever, the -c and -d flags can do good things.

wc is also useful, mostly as "wc -l". If you keep data in line oriented, human readable form, "wc -l" counts data items.
As far as I’ve done, I’ve had to upload drivers licenses to websites before (e.g. to open an online banking account or whatever) and I don’t recall doing anything other than uploading the license.
> want a tech company where people are there to make good products first and get paid second. And the pay should be good. The lifestyle comfortable. No grindset bullshit

Congratulations, you’ve invented the HR department in corporate America.
No no, you don’t understand. He said “my fellow Democrats”. Steve Buscemi couldn’t have pulled it off better.
Fraud is also a crime that can be prosecuted. The lack of prosecution exposes they have not found any fraud, and probably aren't even looking.
Could you give an example of when a similar law was used in the US in the past under a different administration to silence dissidents?

EDIT: I’ve found that if you argue in good faith your comment won’t be removed. Are you? Or are you just stirring the pot?
I don't think it's obviously reasonable unless you also get (or pay for) a 100 year manufacturer's warranty.

Yet the comments here talk like we have norms that don't exist. The actual norms we have are that you're SOL if your product breaks after the warranty, even due to a defect, and even for things that cost 1000x the price of a DVD.
Being able to control their every move, scale them to whatever capacity is required, avoid payroll taxes, health plans and surprise co-pay costs, equity sharing, etc might make this worthwhile for many companies.

That said, the trade-off is that you're basically hiring consultants since they really work for OpenAI :)
The sad irony is war can be very profitable for those in the right places.

Time to invest in companies that produce uranium? What are the ingredients that will be needed for all this re-proliferation, and which companies are in the supply chain?
Isn't Falcon 9 public pricing slightly more expensive than JAXA/MHI H-IIA? SpaceX doesn't disclose true cost, but they're not even 2x cheaper than some competition. They're within same ballpark at government scale.

Of course, SS/SH is supposed to change the equation completely, but as it stands...
I don't think taking a stand against making giant technology companies (that people generally don't like much) work to combat revenge porn (which literally everybody finds revolting) is going to be the political winner this Verge editorial thinks it will be.

Especially annoying: the "no matter how carefully crafted the bill is" framing, which not only makes the argument non-falsifiable, but also cuts off discussion rooted in what the bill actually says and ensures that we're going to stay fixed in the orbit of a pointless ideological debate.
Given xAI built its 100k gpu datacenter in a very short time, is the infra really a moat?
Regexes were invented by Kleene in 1951, to describe McCulloch-Pitts neural nets. So, artificial intelligence!

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_memorand...
The EFF explains the issue better than the linked article: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/02/take-it-down-act-flawe...

In particular, it's an encryption ban:

>The online services that do the best job of protecting user privacy could also be under threat from Take It Down. While the bill exempts email services, it does not provide clear exemptions for private messaging apps, cloud storage, and other end-to-end encrypted (E2EE) services. Services that use end-to-end encryption, by design, are not able to access or view unencrypted user content. How could such services comply with the takedown requests mandated in this bill? Platforms may respond by abandoning encryption entirely in order to be able to monitor content—turning private conversations into surveilled spaces.
A machine that has a subjective consciousness, experiences qualia, etc.

See Thomas Nagels classic piece for more elaboration

https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Nagel_Bat.pdf
Apparently last time their laser rangefinder was turned off groundside and thus wasn’t available during landing.

This time they remembered to turn it on, but it didn’t work very well.
In some languages that's the way to go but I have any type of autocorrect or prediction turned off as it doesn't help.
Might be less complicated than that. DOGE are vandals destroying the government because they hate the government.
Lack of translation layer wasn't the problem, AMD's shit being completely broken (for this purpose) was the problem. Driver-level broken, possibly hardware-level broken. Black screens, restarts, wrong answers, threads full of people shouting into the void year after year about the same behavior before seeing the light and buying nvidia.

Then NVDA pumped by trillions and AMD did not and even AMD's crack team of trained denial specialists could no longer stay the course, so they started to turn the ship. But that was only a year or two ago and even the tiniest changes take years in hardware land so the biggest sins are still baked in to the latest chips, but at least the software has started to suck a bit less.

I no longer see 100% of the people who try to build on AMD compute run away screaming. Many do, but not all. That's a change, an important and positive one. If AMD keeps it up maybe they can save us from 80% margins on matrix multiplication after all.
Yea, buy why handcuffs? Is it to limit range of motion when taking precision measurements?
Tobacco is good for you, just look at this report compiled by all the big Tobacco companies
Good stuff. Back in the day technical innovation and risk taking was an integral part of Disney... I miss those days. How far the house of mouse has fallen.
> Prices for lithium carbonate and other lithium medicament's are not at all cheap

You can buy a 3 month supply of Lithium Orotate for like $10. I certainly wouldnt recommend self prescribing this kind of thing though.
Donald Trump exercised his right to be a traitor to the cause of protecting our democratic allies.

He didn't have cut off aid and intelligence. Zelensky didn't MAKE him do it. It was his right and he chose this.

So now he gets to wear that label.
Russia is grooming LLMs .

> “The long-term risks – political, social, and technological – associated with potential LLM grooming within this network are high,” the ASP concluded. “The larger a set of pro-Russia narratives is, the more likely it is to be integrated into an LLM.”
SSH tunnel.
I used DESQview for a number of years, and always think about it when see new TUI systems

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DESQview
according to fans of Deepseek and some people on HN, isn't LLM going to become a commodity?
Who is "they"?

Who is "our"?

What "freedom" do you think you have?
Not op but I was subjected to a statistical physics exam where the examiner didn't quite appreciate the Kolmogorov axiomatization of the probability theory (which I majored in). It was weird to say the least...
I wouldn't say entirely. Starship isn't going to be involved in Artemis II, but Artemis III supposed to take humans to the moon in December 2025. Nobody's on schedule.
I found this article much easier to digest than the paper. Nice one
I wonder if some of these humanitarian projects are "wasting the money" on helping three letter agencies manage and finance foreign activities. Then there comes some tech billionaire with a chainsaw and thinks it's funny how he stopped the funding and was cheering about it without noticing what he just did.
Softbank’s Masa’s magic is convincing everyone, every time, that he hasn’t consistently top ticked every market he’s invested in for the last decade. Maybe Satya’s finally broken himself of the spell [1].

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/01/business/dealbook/softban...
you are right, Microsoft is a hodge podge of legacy on-premise software, legacy software lifted and shifted to the cloud, and some innovation pockets.

Microsoft bread and butter is Enterprise bloatware and large Enterprise deals where everything in the world is bundled together for use-it-or-lose-it contracts.

Its not really much different from IBM like a two decades ago
Nussbaum's specific list of capabilities isn't anticipated by Mill, but that doesn't mean Mill dodges questions like what is human flourishing. Mill wrote a lot about politics and what makes human life go better, both in terms of what is ultimately valuable and what it is crucial to nurture in people for them to experience such value. His views on education, freedom of expression and more in political theory are in that way covering some of the same ground that Nussbaum does with here capabilities approach.
The 36% of the electorate who didn't vote is also kinda no-thanks.

Many of them had reasonable excuses, due to how hard we make it to vote in this country. But an awful lot of them took a look at the two candidates, shrugged, and said "Looks like a tossup to me." I can't imagine the EU wants them much more than it wants the 30% who actually voted for it.
> how do you not topple over

Projectile grappling-hooks to embed into nearby ground then winch the line taught? Just have to make sure all are launched at the same time with force vectors that cancel out. Maybe even launch them before touchdown so it doesn't topple over during landing if one of the feet land on a random rock.
I don't understand why you'd staple an analysis of (real!) flaws in the Take It Down Act to a conclusion that it "doesn't matter" whether the Take It Down Act is a good bill because "any bill that regulates internet content" is a bad idea. Doesn't each half of the article undercut the other?
"Optimistic locking" is a bad choice of words because no locking is optimistic.

In the well-known access method described here, the writers access the shared data with mutual exclusion, i.e. they use locking.

The readers use no locking, but they access the shared data concurrently and optimistically, hoping that the access will succeed at the first attempt.

When the readers are unlucky, they must retry the access.

So there is locking used by writers for mutual exclusion and there is optimistic access used by the readers.

There is no "optimistic locking", which is a contradiction in terms (locking is pessimistic).

In general, there are only 3 methods for accessing shared data: mutual exclusion (a.k.a. pessimistic access), where locking forces the accesses to be sequential, and 2 methods where accesses may be concurrent, optimistic access (a.k.a. lock-free), where retries may be necessary, and dynamic partitioning of the shared data (typically used for shared arrays or for shared buffers/queues), where neither locking nor retries are needed.

The method described here for accessing B-trees employs a combination of all 3 methods, because the release of the locks at higher levels is a consequence of restricting the future accesses to only a part of the shared data, i.e. the writers that access the shared B-tree start by accessing sequentially the root, but then they partition the tree between themselves, so the next accesses that fall in distinct subtrees may proceed concurrently.
Hi there, thank you for your comment!

I tend to hover around 500wpm without any loss of understanding when I read normally and I can go up to around 900wpm in RSVP reading. When I try to read "slower" or when I have to read slower (e.g. when the book is technical or specifically hard to read) I find my mind wanders a lot and I lose where I left off so I need to restart the page etc. You should definitely do what helps you understand better though!

Hope you have a great day :)
And now it's time to correct the mistake they made.
There's king of stonks a German comedy series on Netflix inspired by Wirecard
> Although there is: https://www.netmeister.org/blog/urls.html

I think the section named "Pathname" is wrong. It describes the path of an URL as if every server was Apache serving static files with its default configuration. It should describe how the path is converted into a HTTP request.

For instance, the article states that "all of these go to the same place : https://example.org
https://example.org/
https://example.org//
https://example.org//////////////////".
That's wrong. A web client send a distinct HTTP request for each case, e.g starting with `GET // HTTP/1.1`. So the server will receive distinct paths. The assertion of "going to the same place" makes no sense in the general case.
Sublime headline.
AMD Announces Ryzen 9 9950X3D and 9900X3D Pricing and Availability
> $20k can't get you that many PhD. Even PhD students, who's nominal salary is maybe $3-5k a month, effectively costs double that because of school overhead and other stuff.

But you are not getting a PhD worker for 20K with "AI", that's just marketing.
What's the over/under for how long it takes before RFK starts espousing testicular tanning?
Popped out on f nowhere? Do you suppose that some... campaign contributions... had something to do with this?
> There are other ways to use the help function, but before we dive into those I'd like to address the *, and / symbols shown in the output above.

Where is this addressed? Is there a section missing here?
I'm not a web dev, so I apologize if my questions are naive. Does this mean its a chrome-only thing or does it become a web standard? I ask because I would like to imagine the future isn't tied to Google's whims, graveyard of initiatives, and requirements.
Except alot more is happening in America then just dubious journals like mass firing of scientists and experts
"They" means a long line of leaders who see our basic rights as obstacles, "our" means Americans although it's probably the same in some other places, and "freedom" means our ability to communicate with each other, without censorship or a secret officer reading our private letters.
Judge wants lawyer fined $15K for using AI slop in filing
CSS is now getting functions as well [0].

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43236126
oh figured it out - https://news.ycombinator.com/shownew
I’m not sure if what you’re proposing as a libel thesis actually is. Keep in mind the Heritage Foundation wrote the literal playbook (Project 2025) that the Trump admin is clearly following. In P2025 they clearly call out the intent to dismantle the U.S. government, remove safeguards and checks against presidential power and replace career public servants with Trump loyalists by the 10s of thousands.

That’s not some liberal talking point. That’s straight from conservatives. Feel free to see how far along they are in implementing P2025 here:

https://www.project2025.observer/
The Russian Woodpecker of Chernobyl [video]
I only wrestled for 2 weeks in 8th grade but have ASICS MATCONTROL 3 on right now. My gym shoes :)

High school wrestling though might push things too far.Many of those guys under heavyweight do not have the bodyfat % to be restricting so much so are actually losing muscle mass.

I know Jordan Burroughs diet that I have seen seemed like maximum micro nutrients for the calorie because how else can you eat to be a 4 time world champion at 74kg?

I am probably half an inch taller than Burroughs and 163lbs is impossible. It is too far. Way too far.
I'm incredibly excited for this launch! Bolt Foundry is the first company to use [Isograph], which is a framework for building data-driven apps that are performant and stable out of the box. It does so by making heavy use of a compiler and of generated files, and essentially being an incremental computation engine for your UI. Your UI becomes performant by doing the least amount of unnecessary work.

And Bolt Foundry is truly the perfect first adopter! As "A big tech dev experience" implies, they're very focused on providing great DevEx. And a bunch of them previously worked at Meta, where they used Relay, and understood the powers that it provides.

Isograph aims to provide an even better developer experience (see the YouTube link), and give you the things that previously were only feasible at FAANG-co scale: e.g. even in a very dynamic app, fetching just the JavaScript and data you end up using.

So far, they've had a great experience using Isograph!! You should also [give it a try] or [contribute].

[Isograph]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sf8ac2NtwPY

[give it a try]: https://isograph.dev/docs/quickstart

[contribute]: https://github.com/isographlabs/isograph