skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I too had the sugarcube polio vaccine. I had no idea what polio was but Mom told me that it was a bad disease that had left one of my uncles partially paralyzed. He caught polio as a young teen and had a limp until he passed away at nearly 80. Another uncle ended up deaf in one ear from a childhood infection that I think was meningitis. It left him ineligible to serve during the Vietnam War with a couple of his brothers and cousins though he tried to join every branch.
I hold crypto, mostly BTC, and think this is just another grabby move by the Trump administration that will ultimately harm crypto.
What you're seeing is called confirmation bias. That most of your gay male friends are flamboyant says more about the company you keep around (Which is great btw, and not a judgement call) than all the other gay and bi guys just going about their day, unnoticed.
I miss like any form of social idealism.
Nothing stops, but it will be a different CSRF token, which will not match to the one generated for the original page.

Server keeps track of which CSRF token is given to which client using cookies (usually some form of SessionID), and stores it on the server somewhere.

It is a very common pattern and all frameworks support it with the concept of "sessions" on the back end.
Salute to the original founder that was forced to give up his partnership
I imagine what they really mean is that there's something that can't be built by us (and maybe that can't even be "plugged into" by things we build), that we can't build anything that carries out the same function, and this is what determines the "human conscience".

So, to my eyes, typical baseless speculation
Congrats to everyone involved!

I planned to watch the live stream but wasn't able to. The moment of successful landing was quite modest, only a mostly-static screen with telemetrics was shown to the public, but it absolutely felt magical. It feels like the moon is well within humankind's reach by now.

Coincidentally, I found a copy of Uchu Kyodai (by Chuya Koyama) in my local library, and started reading it recently. It's fun to compare the perspectives from more than a decade ago, to the actual development we have right now, regarding space exploration.

(This was posted to another thread, but I moved it here after I realized comments were moved)
> That is incorrect, at least for the chargeback types you brought up in this thread and most in-person payments

Where did you hear this? It’s incorrect, at least for Amex and MasterCard. (I don’t know about Visa.)

The merchant pays. Merchant agreements give the banks the power to forcibly remove funds from the merchant account on initiation of a chargeback. If the merchant doesn’t replenish per their agreement they face fees, restrictions and potentially termination. There is zero chance American Express just picked up the six figures of chargebacks for the folks who put them in today.
> crypto has zero intrinsic value

So do fiat currencies.
"no one is accepting my current price, so the solution is to increase my demands"?
>it's really difficult to build things to last

A lot of depends on where your price point is. Do you compete with Temu or do you sell expensive things. People rarely expect cheap things to last, but if you don't compete on being the cheapest, than the product is expected to be made to last
Let's say he can't ignore congress.

But let's say congress don't care to act ... does it matter / do laws mean anything then?

SCOTUS has decided the POTUS is off limits anyway ... does it even matter if congress or even the courts do anything?

I suspect SCOTUS likely thinks they were being a little nuanced letting Trump off the hook legally, but I think they just started the landslide that now they can't stop. The SCOTUS majority has created an inevitable situation where absolute power reaches its obvious ending ...
Earlier:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43228029

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43210138
As I age, this is one of my great regrets: not having written my about life more. Most of the past is just this vague smear. Writing is the only thing that I've been able to think of that answers the problem. I wish I'd known earlier.
It strikes me as quite arrogant to assume that those are the only possibilities. People, even experts in a field, disagree about topics and the implications of evidence all the time. Arguing that honest disagreement must reduce down to one of the three categories you list is basically saying "my point of view is so obviously correct that only bad thinkers or bad people could disagree". But that's almost certainly not the case.
"At the end of its operations, Blue Ghost will stay put, destined to remain on the moon’s surface indefinitely."

Is that a euphemism for "Humans are leaving rubbish to pollute another part of the universe?"
It was flipped upside-down like a Turtle?
> closest that exist are "Not as Described or Defective Merchandise/Services" and "Misrepresentation", none of which imply it's up to the consumer to decide

Issuing bank decides. Consumer advises.

> could barely find any information on what the statue (equivalent) is

There is very little statute governing chargebacks. It’s almost all contractual. Very different from paying with cash, cheque or wire.
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43170090
I truly love this aesthetic and it's vision of the future. Clean air, healthy food, empowered communities. Abundance without waste, progress without destruction, and equal opportunity without tyranny. This is the future that we should be developing software to enable. Instead, I'm frequently disappointed by the modern usages of software, which seem to cause excess waste, accelerate the destruction of our planet, and enable authoritarians. Maybe it's time to rethink what we're working towards.
I'm not sure why you got downvoted. But I'm not very familiar with Snyder's work so maybe I'm missing something controversial here.

But as you describe it that's fairly plausible to me. Russia under communism had no rule of law and was basically a mafia state. So it's not surprising that remnants of those institutions, the paranoia, the corruption, opportunism, etc carried over through the transition.

My point wasn't that Gorbachev was some sort of miracle worker, just that he helped end totalitarianism and is recognized for his efforts. And Trump will definitely not be remembered as that kind of figure. Putin is trying to bring back the state religion, and Trump is trying to do something similar in the US so if we're going to compare him to someone in Russia historically, it will be someone who tried to tear things down and impose a dictatorship for the supposed "betterment" of the people.
Do you think the fact that new cars have engines that are not rebuildable but only replaceable is just a coincidence? With every year car manufacturers get more insight in how and when things break, thus allowing the use of more plastic parts in the engine bay
> It feels like the moon is well within humankind's reach by now.

It has been for the last 65 years. ;)
Do you realize how many people don't give two shits about social media or Elon Musk but love to hear from their friends and family?

This is not difficult. There are so many ways to broach the subject. Some examples that I feel: I thought Trump was going to lower grocery prices. Who put Elon in charge of dismantling the US government? Why does Trump want a hotel in Gaza of all the ridiculous things you could possibly want?
> would that consciousness still have an experience?

If the original one did, then yes, of course. You're performing the exact same processing.

Imagine if instead of an LLM the billions of people instead simulated a human brain. Would that human brain experience consciousness? Of course it would, otherwise they're not simulating the whole brain. The individual humans performing the simulation are now comparable to the individual neurons in a real brain. Similarly, in your scenario, the humans are just the computer hardware running the LLM. Apart from that it's the same LLM. Anything that the original LLM experiences, the simulated one does too, otherwise they're not simulating it fully.
Have you tried lately? Since Elon started being a dumbass?
Maybe throw some wasm in there.
https://www.crn.com/news/applications-os/199501735/microsoft...
It's going to dramatically depend on department. EPA? Probably a passion, but also not a lot of other places to work for those exact jobs. IRS auditor? Maybe; maybe that's the job they could get, or maybe it's a choice between that and making $$$ at a big-name consultancy. 18F? Almost certainly a choice of patriotic duty, because those people could walk into any big-tech job and make multiple times their salary.
Cool but we were talking about Rossman
If they ban this and the revenue of pornstars drops they will somehow find a way to blame men for it.
The market might still end up for the year, it will just be a more volatile year.

It would be very unlikely to see another double digit gains year in a row.

That being said, it could also crash hard and not recover to these levels for a decade. There is lots of historical precedence for that - especially at these valuations.

I’m chiefly concerned about tariffs, housing market weakness, labor market weakness, and reversing global liquidity flows (maybe by the end of the year).

Just chilling in mostly gold and treasuries is looking very attractive on a risk adjusted basis.
You need fiat to pay your taxes.
> straight women find most straight men to be a threat

What do you mean by this?

I have many female connections and don't think any of them perceive me as a "threat".. my wife never indicated this either, yet I'm clearly heterosexual.

I don't think acting civil with the opposite gender has anything to do with one's sexual orientation.
>Well rich people already own most assets. Why would they want their holdings to lose value?

If wealth is a function of ownership why would you care if your $500m went down to $100m if the purchasing power you cratered is well below what you lost in 'value' while your ownership increased?
I serve this file for a fintech. If there is a legit vulnerability, I both want that report in my inbox for triage with as little friction as possible and I also want to be able to demonstrate that we made a best effort to receive that information from a good faith reporter. Is it work? Yes, of course, but that’s part of the job (to defend the enterprise).
My personal quick nitpick of a feedback would be

- maybe users do not want a "modern" alternative to Goodreads per se? I know, I am not saying people are looking for a website from the 90s but one might want to keep in mind that this is a community that still reads books (and a lot of them actual paper books). This looks like standard website interface that get inherited from one of those nuvo web frameworks looks. The "feel" from the home page is very bland. Like a standard landing page of some sort.

- And sadly I do not want to create an account to explore the features and then hope that there is an easy delete a/c option. In fact even if I'd know I could delet the a/c I would be not inclined to create an a/c

- No, please don't do the 10 point rating. That's all over. 4 is the best with half stars. Hell, even 2 or 3 would not be bad. I'd have said 5 with half stars but that's essentially 10. 0, 0.5,…, 3.5, 4 is really the best imho. Even after Mr Ebert is gone and a lot of the later reviewes on his site are just, let's say not what he was even remotely, I still like rogerebert's 4 star rating system.

- Since I have not tried it, I hope you have an easy way to import everything from Goodreads.
Already done.

https://github.com/yurkagon/Doom-Nukem-CSS
I wouldn’t call Israel a terrorist organization but ok
i remember you had a script that created animated images before that even was a thing. It exploited some kind of quirk in Netscape, must have been 1994-1996?
"Firefly is the prime contractor for lunar delivery services using Blue Ghost landers."

Cool! Now we can start cluttering up the moon with garbage, too!
Thanks for the reply.

When I think about understanding, in principle I require consistency not completeness. In fact, understandability is predicated on consistency in my view.

If I liken the quest for AGI to the quest for human flight, wherein we learned that the shape of the wing provides nearly effortless lift, while wing flapping only provides a small portion of the lift for comparatively massive energy input, then I suspect we are only doing the AGI equivalent of wing flapping at this point.
it's more like a resort than a city, which is the problem.
How do I know what Trump's administration is going to do in the future? Project 2025 laid it all out. Secondly, a President doesn't directly control the budget -- that is the job of congress. There are some things directly in the purview of the president, but everything else has to be done the "the bully pulpit" via negotiating with congress. So, no Biden could not unilaterally change the law -- he failed to get congress to do it.

Trump is operating on the novel legal theory of the unitary executive -- that the executive branch really has all the power and the other two are subordinate and operate at the will of the President. I don't understand how people can listen to Trump assert this and the the next moment Trump is railing about how Obama broke the law by spying on Trump's campaign. If they really believe "if the president does it, then it is legal" then how could Obama have broken the law.

We aren't entirely sure what he is up to, but clearly allowing unfettered access to Musk's minions, none of whom have clearance, to hover up all data and install who knows what software on the computers of every department is not legal. Clearly, demanding George to "find 11,780 votes" is not legal. Illegally taking top secret documents, lying about having them, actively moving them when the Feds came to collect them, all illegal. Clearly, keeping cooking books and keeping two sets of books in his personal business are not legal. He has taken in tens of millions, possibly billions, despite the emoluments clause (the open extortion of media companies in the first case, the pump and dump trump crypto coin, the suspect investments from Qatar and others into Kusher's failing real estate deals).
To respond to a question in the blog post:

>> The motivation is that the <form> element from HTML 4.0 (which predates cross-site fetch() and XMLHttpRequest) can submit simple requests to any origin,…

> Question to readers: How is that in line with the SameSite initiative?

I actually added that little paragraph to the MDN CORS article in 2022 (https://github.com/mdn/content/pull/20922) to clarify where the term “simple request” from CORS came from, since previously the article only said that it is not mentioned in the fetch spec. You’re right that the paragraph did not mention the 2019 CSRF prevention in browsers that support or default to SameSite=Lax (https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bi...), so cross-site forms with method=POST will not have cookies anymore unless the server created the cookie with SameSite=None.

It is quite confusing that SameSite was added seemingly independently of CORS preflight. I wonder why browser makers didn’t just make all cross-origin POST requests require a preflight request instead of making same-site-flag a field of each cookie.
Idk what gp meant, but css lacks what could be called “selector accounting”. You never know which parts affect what and whether they affect anything at all. Because instead of importing/use-ing styles or classes, it imposes styles over some unpredictable set of nodes through a selector. On top of that, every name is global.

This contrasts to every modern language, regardless of declarative or not, where to get the effect you import it explicitly into a chunk/block/component/etc.

If css was C, it could add “unsigned” to every first int variable in a function that goes after a typedef. Which was part of “aspect oriented programming”, which was deemed an absurdly bad practice, to put it simply.
These things aren't actually as dangerous as Reddit and the white collar internet make them out to be. The "being dumb" to near miss conversion ratio isn't that high and the near miss to someone gets hurt conversion ratio is abysmal.
Support the 2025 Perl and Raku Conference
These are closer to macros than functions, especially without css if(). It's nothing that you can't already do.
TAS: Tool-Assisted-Speedrun. A kind of speedrunning, where control inputs aren't given by humans, but are carefully pre-programmed into a bot that will replay them. This allows to do things that would otherwise be veeeeery difficult (and sometimes impossible) for humans.

GDQ: Games Done Quick, the name of the Youtube channel.

OoT: Ocarina of Time, a beloved Zelda game from the 90s.

ACE: Arbitrary Code Execution. A vulnerability that lets you run whatever you want. You can use it to skip huge parts of the game, therefore achieving the fast speedrun
Even kids with access to power tools usually don't have access to shop tools.
I agree that it goes both ways, in the sense that I support UBI. As I think there is a level of wealth that society has an interest in preventing anyone being above, I also think there is a level of poverty that society has an interest in preventing anyone being below.
>My fear is that LLM generated code will look great to me, I won't understand it fully but it will work.

puzzled. if you don't understand it fully, how can you say that it will look great to you, and that it will work?
Personally, I salute only Chairman Steve. All hail!
Git init is all I need. The rest is just from gui
Looks decent to me, I understand they have to stay within the normal look of CSS. That function, other than nesting, could every well be parsed by a 20-year-old parser.
Huawei improves AI chip production in boost for China's tech goals
Well, somebody has to HODL the bag at the end. Why not the taxpayers?
Isn't this the same argument that supports banning violent video games?
Wow what a small world! When I was learning Perl in the early 2000s, I learned in part by copying and tweaking your scripts.

Thanks for sharing these into the world. I found them a huge help.
Super cool. This is one of those things you watch and just "feels like the future". I know, we've been there before but it still feels like an awesome event.

(someone go back to Venus, I know it's hard, but someone please)
I once built a player with a MAX98357 I2S Amp that could drive a small speaker,
it was fun.
Take your by own advice ;)

Don’t pass up a chance to pee is the advice in question.

Which I’d equate to; Better safe than sorry
It's not a coincidence - new cars have turbochargers and electronic engine control that provide huge performance/efficiency gains and necessarily are harder to repair.

Your average shitty 4-banger from the 80s or 90s is not remotely comparable to a new engine - in almost every respect (including reliability!) the new one is better.
Is that why Ukrainian men are being dragged kicking and screaming off the streets?
Dramatically improve microscope resolution with Fourier Ptychography [video]
The Rise, Fall, and (Potential) Rebirth of Quincy Quarries
ADC #immediate is 2 cycles, as is ASL. Are you really multiplying a constant by 3 at runtime? Probably not. ADC zp is 3 cycles. Plus 2 cycles for the CLC.
Feather Wiki
Short answer: no.

Long answer: no, oil is needed for the functioning of our society. Helping smooth price volatility is useful and valuable. On the other hand, BTC is not needed for our society to function, and so there is little to no value in managing prices of it. This appears to be an attempt to hedge against the collapse in the trust in the dollar.
Hulu Outage During Oscars
I see, I guess it was never a standalone product then, from reading a Reddit post, it’s a feature built into assistant. Thanks, solves a mystery for me.
Could you expand on the trust bit? I recently switched to Brave due to it being the best as blocking adds and fingerprinting.

What am I missing that I should be considering?
What we have and AI don't are emotions. After all, that what animates us to survive and reproduce. Without emotions we can't classify and therefore store our experiences because there no reason to remember something which we are indifferent about. This includes everything not accessible by our senses. Our abilities are limited to what is needed for survival and reproduction because all the rest would consume our precious resources.
I don't see how this is wrong?
Do we get 4k video? :)
> not sending the message

I’m not trying to send a message. I’m trying to undo a mistake and rectify a wrong.
I could use some optimistic takes on the future. I read the news if I want dystopian. In everyday life, I do some local work to try and make housing more abundant and less impactful, but it's a small piece of the puzzle.
I try to remember that the USA is the same country that made the 90s Star Trek I grew up with a mainstream hit.
https://archive.is/B0VUT
I learned CNC by hand writing G code. I think it was valuable.
That’s an easy way to sit on the sidelines for a decade as the market doubles. I thankfully stayed invested while my tax accountant suggested selling all my stock in 2019…
> It's also not consistent with your much less considered verbiage above that somehow this was "all (not partly) on Democrats".

I didn't say that. You should reply to what I am actually saying, not whatever quotes you made up.

> That statement is tautological (literally everything happens because something didn't prevent it).

One of the jobs of a politician is to protect the country from its enemies. Dems failed to do that, despite ample warning and opportunity. This demonstrates what I said: they are not up to the task of rescuing the US.
Not at least in that link. It is a clone and not running the original binary.
Robotics is unfortunately not there yet, unless we plan to send everything there fully assembled with zero maintenance ever. Unless you mean purely for basic exploration.
It seems like Trek handwaved away or ignored a lot of the issues that weren't directly solved by replicators. Joseph Sisko had a restaurant on earth. The idea of a guy who loves to cook for people having a place where anyone can walk in off the street, order from a menu, and eat for free is easy to envision. The problem comes when you start to think about how there's a very finite amount of physical space. Questions like who decided that he should have that property for his restaurant vs anyone else who wanted to do something with it just never come up.

I'm interested in seeing Solarpunk grow so that we can see different people's ideas on how issues like this can be addressed without these fictional worlds becoming dystopian.
Also from TFA:

"Thanks for your patience in waiting for this article! After publishing my piece on EgyptAir 804 in December, I moved half way across the country in a long, messy relocation process fraught with other struggles along the way. But here I am, and here it is. Thank you!"
GPT-4 was 1.3T. 221B active. 2 experts active. 16 experts total.
The cost of improved quality still need only offset the cost of returns within the warranty period and opinion on reasonable product lifetime though. At some point the cost of better quality will be greater than the profit margin a company is willing to accept and a consumer is willing to pay, but it’s in the companies best interest to get that as close to a number that passes the pub test (e.g., an ‘untentional’ bug bricking the firmware the day after warrantee expires)

I’m not convinced some of my very expensive smart products aren’t intentionally degrading over time, given fw is introducing more functional bugs.
Exclusion of top performers can lead to intentional underperformance
> 1. Friends reviews on book is actually not that hard at all. We will implement it right after we get the friends and follow system working.

I mean it's hard because you have to get my friends to join. Goodreads has the network effect going for it.