skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The actual trend these days is that if your company struggles, blame AI ;) I can't say about WebMD and Chegg, but Quora and SO started going downhill before this AI (boom or bubble, whatever you call it) due to their policies, politics, and management. IMHO, of course.
F# allows you to use React pretty much directly, but it has still been only a modest success.
I think the thing that applies here is the story about the potters making one perfect pot vs. 1000 imperfect ones. In the end the ones who were going for volume were the ones who were making the more beautiful ones too.

The best way to learn is just keep hammering. Keep your eyes open, whenever you find a game that you like or even just a demo or youtube video keep that around as a reference and then just copy it. Repeat it, think how it's done and then try to improve it or adapt it to make it your game.

Also remember, as an indie developer nobody will play your games. So keep that in mind and ask yourself what is your goal when making games. If you're trying to make it big and make a living and get yourself celeb status as an indie game dev it's not going to happen. Well I mean, every once in a while there's some dev who lucks out and has the perfect combination of stumbling on a good game idea and the right channels to actually make something out of it but that's not going to be you or me or anyone else really. (it's that one lucky guy out of a million).

Of course you might want to make gemos or demos just to sell yourself as a developer candidate to go work at some other studio.

Anyway, just keep iterating and copy without shame and keep making games.

PS. Actually you should be very encouraged by getting any feedback at all. That's already 10000x more than what most indie game devs ever get. Most common feedback is 0 feedback.
The article says this.

But there is another lasting effect of the attack, hidden deep in the genes of
Syrian families. The grandchildren of women who were pregnant during the siege —
grandchildren who never experienced such violence themselves — nonetheless bear
marks of it in their genomes. Passed down through their mothers, this genetic
imprint offers the first human evidence of a phenomenon previously documented
only in animals: The genetic transmission of stress across multiple generations.

The article clearly implies a modify of the genes. The genome is altered.
A lot of content has been written by Indian content farms anyway. I prefer the AI written content. It gets right to the information you want without restating it's purpose 4 or 5 times and having to scroll down the first 500 words of the article.
Another way to get infinite loops is using a Comparator or Comparable implementation that doesn’t implement a consistent total order: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62994606/concurrentskips...
(This is unrelated to concurrency.)

Whether it occurs or not can depend on the specific data being processed, and the order in which it is being processed. So this can happen in production after seemingly working fine for a long time.
Those features are probably used by FSR4. The 9070 isn't very attractive for LLMs though.
This ignores the volume problem. Human written content can be copied and rewritten via AI in a bunch of different ways, instantly. Human content will go away not because it's bad, but because it's immediately drowned out in a way that is unfixable.
The nature of the changes aren’t well understood. It seems dangerous to assume that they are unhealthy, or somehow destructive when the opposite could just as easily be true. The children of those experiencing violence may be more robust in some ways rather than the opposite. It’s an interesting finding, and something to be understood better, but jumping to the conclusion that it’s a bad thing it’s just dismissive of the robustness of humanity in general.
Eventually the pendulum will swing back.He would definitely sell the message much better than Kamala
DNA is source code, and there is a bunch of RNA processes that read it and do stuff to make you live. Parts of DNA can be turned on and off, that’s called expression. Epigenetics is the study of how genes are expressed. Gene expression can change without the genome itself changing depending on external conditions, which is a key part of adaptability.
The massive amount of online features Brave has (just have a look at all the toggles in settings) makes me wonder whether this has been exploited in the wild at all.
It's not that bad. We just don't have the equivalent of GC for multi-threading yet, so the advice necessarily needs to be "just remember to take and release locks" (same as remembering to malloc and free).

Hopefully someone will invent something like STM [1] in the distant year of 2007 or so [2]. It has actual thread-safe data structures. Not just the current choice between wrong-answer-if-you-dont-lock and insane-crashing-if-you-dont-lock.

[1] https://www.adit.io/posts/2013-05-15-Locks,-Actors,-And-STM-...

[2] https://youtu.be/4caDLTfSa2Q?feature=shared
Bring back CU-SeeMe! ;)
Last time I checked it did nothing on YouTube. Has that changed?
I see the models as oracular seeing-stones like a wizard might use.

Ponder the orb! Probe its secrets!

Holographically, all our text is encoded in there. If you know how to query.
A conflict? It's their blog. They can post what they like, including adverts to it.

The news is they appear to be better than this other model. Their methodology might not be trustworthy but deliberately tanking the Ng model wouldn't be smart either.
I don't know seemed to me everyone was using Mega for piracy...

The file lockers that pirates use today operate under the radar. The owners don't do interviews and they use crypto.
msmsgs.exe was p2p. Came with Windows 98, possibly 95. Video, audio, text.

Maybe microsoft forgot they made that?
mpv is still very much Linux majority and AMD is (relatively) more popular on that platform, I'd wager.
This is completely incorrect. There is a difference between:

(1) "PoopCoin" that is a copy paste of an existing cryptocurrency, repackaged with meme (!) marketing, and intentionally used for the creators to make quick money, and is bought ONLY for the purpose of flipping it for money.

(2) A serious cryptocurrency with a whitepaper, written by expert cryptographers, and serves a unique utility vs others, has a huge market cap, is used for real transactions.
The more examples you read the easier you can recall this stuff. I find the single to two teller examples very compelling myself. How quickly a line can build up and how long it lasts when people/tasks are arriving at 90% of capacity and you get one burst of extra traffic is quite shocking the first time you understand the math.
And while they were doing this privacy policy review they also just happened to delete their promise not to sell your data?

>Mozilla has just deleted the following:
“Does Firefox sell your personal data?”

“Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That’s a promise. "
https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43203096

Yeah, could be a mundane reason for that too....

Edit add: My sibling list some other things that just so happened to be going on...
I'm curious which way this will go since this is opinion is split in the current administration. If I had to guess, I'm guessing big tech will win, and h-1b will be protected/maximized.
It's great that people are interested in art and interpretation, but this piece reads like someone trying to come up with a naive critical theory of art in a vacuum, completely independently from the centuries of theory that have already been developed. And to claim that Dada and James Joyce had no lasting influence is comical.
It’s not blatantly or obviously corrupt. It is very likely to be better for taxpayers.
The amount of brainpower wasted on HFT games that will never see the light of day is kind of a bummer. Congrats to China.
There's already some wood pellet boilers on the market which can integrate a sterling engine, to supplement off-grid battery-backed photovoltaic solar panels for local electricity generation. The power output of the sterling engine isn't stellar, but that's to be expected, it's just to help when it's less sunny and you need space heating anyways.

For example: https://www.oekofen.com/en-gb/pellematic-condens/
Every soup is a Stone soup if you consider the metal pot as a stone.
Yeah, our software politely waits for one customer to finish up with their GETs and POSTs before moving onto the next customer.

We have almost one '9' of uptime!
Looks like this is the address to export your chat history:

https://go.skype.com/export
the ads will be in the paid version soon enough
But then they lose their moat. Why not Linux then? Why not Mac OS?
> "Writing is thinking"

Exactly, and I also feel like the act of "transferring" one's thoughts to visual symbols (writing, coding, diagramming) helps a lot with mental defrag and garbage collection.
War reparations gave us the Nazis, so they clearly don’t work. And compassion has given us everything we have seen thus far in history so we can conclude that too is ineffective.
Pretty sure the primary reason for the name was because it was moved to 7nm.
I would expect there to be a measurement error here (although maybe not a significant one): individuals and services have repeatedly complained about AI companies engaging in aggressive crawling. Given that, one might expect to see traffic increases to data sources like Wikipedia and Reddit.
These studies are at the interface of genetics, sociology, and political action. They are underwhelming in all three domains. The genetics are based in puny sample sizes, and this has been true going back to the Yehuda study (2015, PMID: 26410355) and remains true of this broader followup (42 controls and only 18 in the germline exposure group). I do not understand designing experiments like this and taking the results seriously, unless we move on to sociology and political action; in which case the motivation is clear:

“…may encourage policymakers and humanitarian agencies to provide targeted resources to vulnerable populations…”

Hard to argue with that, but do we now use a handful of epigenetic markers generated using a cheek swab sample to decide who gets “healthcare access, special lodging, sanitation, and nutrition”? No, never.

One could get a lot further a lot faster doing well controlled experiments in animal models. But even here the sociological context intrudes. Mike Meaney’s original work in the early 2000s is still open to questions.
but bars are aiding these drunks. a hammer is a tool specifically for hitting and removing nails. If you put that burden on a hammer, you'll have to put that in a pencil and every object in the world.
This prime generating code has fascinated me for a while.

It was first described by E.W. Dijkstra "Notes on Structured Programming (EWD249), 2nd; 1970; TH Eindhoven". https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~EWD/ewd02xx/EWD249.PDF

And then reformulated by D.E. Knuth "Literate Programming; 1984" http://www.literateprogramming.com/knuthweb.pdf

Both use it to demonstrate their way of deriving and documenting an algorithm.

And then R. Martin used it again in his book "Clean Code; 2008". (Though I'm not 100% certain what he wants to demonstrate with his rather difficult formulation.)

For the sake of this email I am going to call it "Dijkstra's algorithm".

If we look at it from an engineering perspective, then Dijkstra's algorithm is never the best choice (at least not in 2025).

If performance is not the most important aspect, e.g. if we need less than 100000 primes, then the straightforward trial division is just as fast - and soooo much simpler (basically impossible to get wrong). Note that this is different in 2025 than it was in 1970, back then multiplications and divisions were much more expensive so it made sense to minimize them.

If performance is the most important aspect, then the sieve of Eratosthenes is much faster. And you can implement the sieve with a sliding window, which is just as fast (or even a bit faster because of caching) and uses a bounded amount of memory.

Concretely - my implementation of the sliding window sieve of Eratosthenes is about 50 times faster than Dijkstra's algorithm (on the same machine) when generating the first 200 million primes (7.5 sec vs 6 min).

The reformulation - both by Ousterhout and Martin - computes multiples for every new prime found. This will quickly lead to overflow, e.g. the 6543-th prime is 65537, so its square will overflow 32 bit unsigned integers. Dijkstra's formulation on the other hand only computes multiples that are actually used to filter, the multiples are never (much) larger than the candidate.

Note that computing the multiples so eagerly will also make the multiples vector unnecessarily large (wasting memory).

Knuth and Dijkstra both remark that there is a subtle problem with the correctness of the algorithm. When incrementing lastMultiple and then later accessing primes[lastMultiple] und multiples[lastMultiple] it is not obvious that those will already be assigned. In fact they will be, but it is very difficult to prove that. It is a consequence of the fact that for every integer n there is always a prime between n and n*n, which follows from Betrand's theorem, a difficult number-theoretical result.

So if you look at Ousterhout's and Martin's reformulation and think "a yes - now I get the algorithm", then beware: You've missed at least two aspects that are relevant for the algorithm's correctness. ;-)
You can post this when you're ready to have people try it but waitlists alone can't be Show HN's, take a look at https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html
Acceleration? Anything with 6s or faster 0-60 is plenty fast unless you're just measuring dick size.

Actual range is matched by Hyundai/Kia EVs, and pricing is quite good as well (especially used). Also these vehicles support V2L, charge faster, and

Don't get me wrong - Tesla has some amazing tech, but they blew their lead in the past few years on that useless Cybertruck instead of iterating their most popular models.
I feel that.

It's difficult to justify any new hardware until I'm in a better place; while it'd be nice, I'm not suffering enough to /need/ a new system.

Until the beginning of 2020, during university, I was still on a 3930K from launch-day in ~2011 and GTX 680. Honestly, I'm not sure I would've bothered if it weren't also for the fact that I wanted to be able to test AVX2 implementations of some of my code without relying on an emulator or someone else's machine every time.

It probably helped that I mostly only care about Source games and RuneScape. But I haven't really played anything since my ex-girlfriend and I broke up in ~2022.

I took his RX 480 to have a display-out and gave him my 2070 Super so it wouldn't go to waste.
It can be some legal actions, for sure? If it's illegal polices should move forward to clean them up?
It's time to confront that Trump's purpose is to end American hegemony and damage us as a nation as much as possible.

You can't maintain hegemony without technological superiority.
> "Microsoft is a corporation built upon the idea of intellectual property".

Relevant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Open_Letter_to_Hobbyists
Scientists and their work is not "fungible"

There is going to be AT LEAST a whole generation of loss of progress at this point.

Everything is going to slowly crawl to a stop

and it's not an accident but by design, it's right out of Project2025

https://www.science.org/content/article/nih-ban-renewing-sen...
dont know about anybody else, but what I see on the mean streets is an ongoing drug epidemic, caused by people wanting to get high, and the conflicting enforcement of some laws but not others.
The absolute proof that "they" are all in on it, is the simple fact that the profits from illegal drug sales, runs into hundreds of billions of dollars, and the only way to move that kind of money, is through the international banking system.And move it does.
The same banking system that wont let me, or you, move more than a couple of thousand dollars around at a time, and records everything, somehow is completly incpapable of tracking sums in the billion plus range.
Show HN: Fourplex – public IPv4 and IPv6 addresses over non-IPsec L2TP
That is an assertion without evidence. Just because lots of people say it doesn't make it true.

And even if it is true, you could carefully and surgically remove the rot, instead of chopping off whole limbs.

And even then, you can do it following the laws set by Congress, rather than by executive decree.
Disagree. The old way of doing SEO blogspam is dead, and good riddance. Well curated, high quality content written by humans, with information and insights you can’t get from LLMs, will reign. Long live curation.
If you created a 32GB card that was great at AI workloads and cheap, it doesn't matter what you set the MSRP to. Street price would rise to the same level as other 32GB cards with similar performance.
Submitters can edit titles in cases like this, but a lot of people submit and walk away instead of double checking that the auto-edits (like removing "how", "why", leading numbers and some other things) don't turn the titles into nonsense. There's a similar window for editing the title as editing comments.
As I recall, those ports ran a version behind.
In case you were wondering, there is a 50% off coupon code: 50OFF_FEB25

Source: https://lowendspirit.com/discussion/9168/l2tp-static-ip-tunn...
> It appears that you’ve ticked the “Reduce motion” option in your system settings. As a result, certain whimsical features on this page have been disabled.

I think this is a Windows setting I enabled to get rid of annoying window animations, didn't know it could affect web pages, and I'm not sure I want it to :D

Well it's nice actually, but in this specific case I think I'd like to override it.
You shouldn't forget to add the /s to your comment, people might mistake you for a fucking idiot.
When you give Google Gemini "2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental" a valid YouTube video URL and ask about it, it hallucinates very vivid descriptions of entirely non-existent videos with content unrelated to the original video. If you keep digging, it even hallucinates highly convincing transcripts and visual descriptions.

The first time it happened, Gemini hallucinated a video from Asianometry which was only tangentially related to the topic of the original video I gave it. On extensive prompting it described, in great detail, a video very similar in style, narration and visuals (including graphs and charts!) to other Asianometry videos. I even thought it may be accessing the wrong video through a bug, but despite a lot of searching I could find no such video on the Internet.

Only when it described the logo incorrectly did I realize this was a hallucination. (To be prudent, I emailed the Asianometry creator and he confirmed he never made any such video, adding that this was one of the weirdest things he ever read.)

The really freaky part is, when I got another person to ask about the same YouTube video, it hallucinated the same Asianometry video again! Only when we asked for detailed transcripts did differences emerge. But when a 3rd person did the same thing they got an entirely different hallucination. Note, the 1st person had the same IP address as mine.

I ran a few experiments with various videos but subsequent hallucinations had absolutely no relation to the original video. I also tried mapping the topics from actual video → hallucinated video, but no pattern is discernible. (Details, chat logs and notes in a doc linked in the post above for the curious.)

We all know models hallucinate, but they are typically relevant to the prompt. In this case, the extent, detail, consistency and almost total irrelevance to the prompt are shocking.
Quora has sucked for a while now. When the second answer on every question is completely unrelated to the question asked, in some weird attempt to make you look up more content on the site, the site starts losing its usefulness.
I find that writing with pen and paper is best for my mind. But, I’m a technologist so I love digital. I use the Kindle Scribe to cover both bases. I’ve written about it here:

https://notes.joeldare.com/handwritten-notes-on-the-kindle-s...
Once they expose data structures that allow generic uses like "if size<5, add item" I'll take another look. Until then, their definition of thread-safety isn't quite the same as mine.
I don't think anyone would willingly move to that turd. Anyone who has to be on it is already on it.
I think a better take on this may be credit cards. And an old classic article, “your coffee shop does not use two phase commit”

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1407829
There are better ways than threading.
> Food for thought. I often think to myself that any error or strange behavior or even warnings in a project should be fixed as a matter of principle, as they could cause seemingly unrelated problems. Rarely is this accepted by whoever chooses what we should work on.

I agree. I hate lingering warnings. Unfortunately at the at time of this bug I did not have static analysis tools to detect these code smells.
Very well said, and very nice to see references to others on point.

As a sidebar: I'm almost distracted by the clarity. The well-formed structure of this article is a perfect template for an AI evaluation of a problem.

It'd be interesting to generate a bunch of these articles, by scanning API docs for usage constraints, then searching the blog-sphere for articles on point, then summarizing issues and solutions, and even generating demo code.

Then presto! You have online karma! (and interviews...)

But then if only there were a way to credit the authors, or for them to trace some of the good they put out into the world.

So, a new metric: PageRank is about (sharing) links-in karma, but AuthorRank is partly about the links out, and in particular the degree to which they seem to be complete in coverage and correct and fair in their characterization of those links. Then a complementary page-quality metric identifies whether the page identifies the proper relationships between the issues, as reflected elsewhere, as briefly as possible in topological order.

Then given a set of ordered relations for each page, you can assess similarity with other pages, detect copying (er, learning), etc.