skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Mozilla just burned out the last remaining bits of good will with the "terms of use" fiasco. At least there's LibreWolf to keep a privacy-respecting fork.
I don't think these things are related, this is talking about the LSU right inside the core. I'd also expect oscillations if there were a thermal problem like you're describing, i.e. core clocks up when IO hub delivers data, IO hub stalls, causes core to stall as well, IO hub can run again delivering data, repeat from beginning.

(Then again, boost clocks are an intentional oscillation anyway…)
More death wouldn't, but a solid established and supported promise of retaliation in case of aggression from either side would.

And "we" here means the democratic world - solidarity is the only way to deter bullies - if Russia knew that EU/US would retaliate in case of an attack on Ukraine, they wouldn't invade.

But of course if you yourself is a bully, you will do everything in your power to cause feuds. And here we are, oh well.
Can you give an example of UI and image outputs that don't work with deno? I'm truly curious.
And Jeff Bezos could make me rich by parting with just one of his many billions. But alas, let's both get back to reality.
That’s a good point, maybe I can be a bit more optimistic henceforth.
No, usually this is done behind closed doors and away from the press.
> Maybe in fields that matter

Fields that matter? Like, say, politics?

One bad health department head will kill way more people than one bad doctor, and you would never guess who's Secretary of Health today, and how uniquely unqualified he is to do that job (or any other job, but that one in particular).

It's wild how the movement that purports to be pushing back on 'unqualified hires' is full of people who can't tell their ass from their elbow. They hold others to a standard that they wouldn't ever dream of meeting.

I understand that morons can be elected, and that's up to the voters, but there's no excuse for political positions that get appointed.
When Israel invaded Gaza, the initial causus belli was the Hamas-led attack on Israel and Israelis, including defenceless civillians at a music festival. There was strong worldwide agreement and support of Israel at that time.

Where Israel took that combat, and what emerged subsequently of Israel's flagrant ignoring of direct threat warnings and assessments from both its own intelligence services and those of foreign countries (notably Egypt) markedly damped down that initial support.

Self-defence is a legitimate grounds for combat and invasion under currently prevailing international norms and law. Disproportionate attacks, most especially on civilians and civil infrastructure not so much. I'll grant that the situation in Gaza is complicated by numerous factors, but not nearly so much in any plausible interpretation as Israel has made its case.

This isn't a case for either war as Israel transacted it or unilateral peace on Israel's part, but there's marked daylight between those positions.
It should just not be done at all. But the main browser vendor loves tracking so they won't forbid this.
Look into the German Chancellor that shut down the nuclear power plants and brought in natural gas from Russia is up to these days. It wasn't "Europe" being ok with it, just classic grift.
by "prepared linkathon" I mean specifically what that commenter was doing - you have a pre-made reply of N (for N >= 1) links that you keep spraying everywhere.

The others

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

But I'm not sure what you mean by "as bad as you suggest". I wasn't suggesting a level of badness, more describing HN's messageboard goals, however aspirational.

Edit: and since we're exchanging questions, I'm curious what sorts of human interactions do you have in mind in which repeating the same thing 20-odd times is not considered, if not outright abusive, at least impolite and non-constructive. I can think of a couple - say, sports events or protests. But none of these map to 'nerd messageboard' in any meaningful way I can see.
That’s not what I was saying at all. I was using Go as an example of what the experience of being helplessly outclassed by a superior intelligence is like: you are losing and you don’t know why and there’s nothing you can do.
Harder yes for those, but the article is describing something that becomes impossible because there is no fallback, not just harder.
The asymmetry in the taxes is related to US dependency on Canadian oil. If the US were to tax our oil at 25% every American would feel that at the pump and in their pocket. They're gonna feel it anyways but more so.

The Canadian conservatives are not going to play ball with Trump either. Poilievre is going to win because the current government is terrible. If anything Trump's actions are strengthening the liberals because it forces them to actually do something which they always try to avoid. To some degree this mirrors the poor governance by the democrats in the US that lost them their elections but at least Poilievre is not a moron.

The whole let's tariff Canada is just plain stupidity. There is no logic. There is no way that Canada is going to yield to the US in any way.
I've been turning my attention to cold war and post-cold war Russia, their espionage, writing and interviews from various defectors, and generally trying to understand if talk of Russian influence is overblown.

It seemed very conspiratorial on its surface. I'm now fairly convinced that the Russians have been refining their espionage for generations, the USA is likely full of agents in all places of society.

Somewhat frighteningly, they anticipated the need to subvert any notions of this occurring, and very explicitly set out on a campaign to destroy trust and truth in US society such that when people began claiming Russia was infiltrating the country, it would just sound like conspiratorial nonsense. You can find plenty of references to this type of initiative going back 50 years at least.

The idea, ultimately, is to get the USA to destroy itself, as you mentioned. The dismantling of democracy in particular is a major accomplishment. Once that trust is eroded, every American's most immediate enemy is another American. Who cares about Russians when you've got neighbours like these, right?

It's hard not to see what's happening as a major victory for Russia. Did they actually orchestrate it? How much? I have no idea. Maybe only slightly, maybe a lot. Regardless, they're celebrating today.
The flip side of this is that the NATO countries have traditionally toed the U.S. stance on diplomatic matters, even on issues that are quite unpopular at home. The understanding abroad is that the U.S. can dictate what it wants, but then the Allies will simply drag their feet.
I wish people would actually read the Budapest Memorandum and see what it actually promises. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum
https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%203007/P...
Yea, I use Firefox sync since I'm still using Firefox, but with the way things are going I'm looking for a ship to jump to that still supports my workflows.
Tactically nukes are useless BTW, and you give tactical nukes to ukraine in this case.
Some entries don't seem as exhaustive as others I've seen. For example, there are only 2 entries for "a-": a-1 is for Greek "without" and a-2 is presumably supposed to combine all the various Old English senses though it only mentions one (Wiktionary, for example, mentions 5: "up", "on", "with", "of", and one without etymology).

But even if we allow that mixture, we're definitely still missing the Latin ones:

ex- turning into a- (blame the French) is admittedly rare so might be out of scope.

ad- turning into a- however is extremely common and definitely should not be merged with the Old English derivations (even though "on" often takes a similar meaning). This is noted on the ad- page but it needs to be mentioned under a- too.

ab- turning into a- is less common due to only happening before a few letters, but is not even mentioned on the ab- page.
You reveal the core problem for Ukrainian allies on either side of the Atlantic, which is that this war is much more important to Russia than it is to anyone else (not including Ukraine).
I don't think the US looked great here at all from this chat, but Ukraine isn't an EU member and isn't a NATO member. France and UK signed the same 'security assurances' pact the US did, they don't have troops deployed either. The way people keep on bringing up NATO in this comment section makes no sense. Hell for the first year or two after the invasion it wasn't even clear if Germany would support Ukraine, they refused to send serious arms for ages.

And the US would love for the EU to defend itself. It's a large part why the U.S helped rebuild after WWII, and why the US has been begging NATO members to contribute the 2% GDP they promised for years. A strong EU is spelled out in U.S foreign policy.
When you say "willingly ended" what you really mean is "surrender". Don't mince the words.
They could soon realize China and Russia may actually make better allies. Might not be what the consensus on HN prefers, but maybe it’s time to look east.

We need more cooperation for collective benefit instead of cooperation for the sake of profit
But that doesn't make it easy to integrate a new script from an author who doesn't provide the hash already.
Come together as what? What does this Beatles-era sentiment entail specifically?
This post is so hilarious as this sort of post shows up every decade or so. Hell, in the early 1900s the US Patent Office asked whether everything that was to be invented already had been.
I get the usual wrong answer.

https://imgur.com/a/wg4bfso
When Russia invaded, Trump wasn't the President quickly dragging the US into the realm of irrelevance, and back then it seemed very unlikely (even unimaginable) that Trump would be President again.

But everyone had too much faith in the Americans, and here we are.
I, for one, agree with you, and my area is cognitive science and artificial intelligence. It's staggering to see the hive-mind of Sam Altman followers chanting about AGI in a Markov chain.

Yes, we can today make natural-sounding hyper-average text, images, and perhaps even music. But that's not what writing and creating is about.
Hm, not sure I agree with you about SO. The experience I have with SO 99%+ of the time is that I google my question, get a result on SO which has a correct and decent quality answer, and I'm back to work. That's a pretty great experience, and I certainly wouldn't say that it misses the bar to be a 'quality platform'. I do agree the moderation is overbearing at times, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater here. The utility of SO - getting answers to questions - is basically unmatched websites that aren't LLM wrappers.

While you won't hear me bemoaning the death of Quora, I'm quite a bit more concerned about SO. After all, where is GPT 5 going to scrape the next set of answers for new libraries and frameworks..?
Maybe, but just from a security point of view it's totally fine.
As far as I can tell, Ublock Origin in Orion on iOS is way better than any other Adblock extension for Safari
One party greated the other cordially in a suit. One showed up to meet the President of the United States in leisure attire! One had made an agreement with Secretary of State and then reneged on it publicly. This same individual then decided to threaten the President of the United Sates. Who exactly was acting like a mobster?

There is nothing immoral about getting paid for services or products. If you don't like it go somewhere else. Why is it that everyone expects hand outs from America but never once ask what can they do for America? It is Ukraine who is exploiting the American people for free arms. Finally an America stood up to their ridiculous behavior, the petty dictator was kicked out of the White House.
Not everyone benefits from cooperation. Feuds are a great "business opportunity" - while everyone's divided and at each other's throat, you can take them out (or extort/bully) one by one, without any consequences, especially if you have the biggest and scariest stick in the block. So, solidarity, cooperation, and people sticking up for each other are absolutely awful for thugs and bullies.
Eventually, under the barrage of AI spam, the sites which "uprank" using "posting volume" metrics will lose users who will see the quality of the content drop like a rock. Other sites, which have better algorithms which are tuned for quality not quantity, will take over and you will be able to post quality content there instead. I think HN is one such place, I often see companies post high-quality content just once or twice a year and it reaches here pretty well.
That's pretty darn cool. I can see all of your services and endpoints without having to click through a bunch of menus in a gui, and discover some I might not have thought to ask for on my own - like "There's a PostMan collection? Great!". Nice idea.
He covered that. NATO troops and security guarantees are only credible if the US/EU is willing to send troops to die in the Donbas. If they're truly willing to do that, why not do it now?

Russia easily calls the bluff.
I think OP is trying to differentiate between Azure APIs, which are unbelievably slow and horrible, and the UI design itself - the layout, the font, how one screen will flow to another screen, what links to what, how it would be laid out in a tool like Figma.

Azure's APIs are atrociously slow. Azure's UI design is pretty nice. There's not much the UI designers can do about their API colleagues.
How are the pointers implemented?

See here: https://github.com/pizlonator/llvm-project-deluge/blob/delug...
Are You Smarter Than a Nuclear Launch Officer?
The early days of Quora was incredibly high quality content from experts in all sorts of fields.

Was probably my favorite website, then they decided to start paying people for questions / answers and it all went to shit so incredibly quickly. The site today is completely unrecognizable from it's origins, really sad.
The whole modern US culture is literally "immigrants who didn't assimilate" with small pockets of native Americans. From my outsider perspective there is very little common between techie from Valley, NY yuppies and a rust belt redneck. Adding some asians and mexicans just improves your cuisine ;)
GPT 2 has been out for more than 6 years.
As long as China supports Russia there is no way Ukraine is going to break Russia. Putin cares nothing about the human cost from his side and it's unlikely Ukraine can have enough of an advantage to be able to push back.

See the "spring offensive".

The reality is more or less a stalemate at this point. While the Trump administration treatment of Zelensky is a disgrace the reality is that some sort of ceasefire around the current borders is going to be the outcome that ends this war. We can work on forcing Russia to withdraw via economic and other pressure after the hot war is over. Just like we broke up the Soviet Union.

This idea of one more year and Russia will break is just a dream with no connection to reality. Putin is going to send a million man to fight with sticks before Russia breaks. And they will.
The problem is this can be anything, not just mods and cracks. That's why I keep separate laptop for banking. This may not help if hackers take over the router. But still better than nothing.
I dont think pain is the possible problem, total collapse is. Russia does everything to hide any pain and problems. Banks are forced to accept loans from soldiers and military adjacent companies while being prohibited from calling them in. The capital controls. The private sector is mostly gone, there is no local car manufacturing any more. 21% interest rates with an official 10% inflation. The increasing lack of official economic data being released...

Hard to tell, and I am not convinced if even the Kremlin has a good overview. In the end it does not matter that much. If Russia is really that robust then they wont stop attacking and if they are bluffing then Ukraine should not stop defending itself.
I can't see the cat! I went back and it just isn't working for me. I'm sad, I like cats.
Am American and yeah no.
There is a huge line of people wanting to get into the US. Authorities can pick and chose whatever they need at the moment (highly educated tech professionals and scientists or cheap labor for manual jobs, etc.) and instantly "magically" get such people, already grown and educated at someone else's expense.
Ask HN: Run crontabs(shell scripts) in Windows 10?
Are there additional softwares for it? I am familiar with Linux'es. I am looking into something which keeps running automatically. I am happy with something inside a virtual machine, but that virtual machine(that uses rocky 9) should run regularly on boot.
The point of the security guarantee is to ensure peace after a ceasefire. It doesn't make any sense to suggest US troops will be responsible for stopping the war or reversing territorial gains, because it will have already stopped. Some stasis of of the front lines, and possibly a DMZ would be a prerequisite.

But more likely, US troops won't be directly on the front lines even after a peace. It adds too much risk of either (super)power escalating in the event of casualties.
Intel is back – stop talking about breaking it up: Craig Barrett
> (let's call it 22.47%... aka the percentage that voted for Kamala) know exactly what's going on

I thought like this but I've come to realize that a lot of Harris voters were suffering from illusions about the likely efficacy of the government she would form. Regardless of her own competence, the democratic party has serious issues, and not many Harris supporters were being honest (if they were aware) about this until well after they lost the election.

I think it's dangerous to think her voters know what's really going on. The issues are genuinely country-wide and not specific only to republicans.

More level-headed republicans are right about a lot of problems in the USA. They want government efficiency for good reasons. Is DOGE the right solution? Absolutely not, it's insane. But these people are happy to see certain initiatives because they're overdue, and they're not wrong about that. Free speech for example; that has become a bit more dodgy over the years. The western world is beginning to press on freedom of speech in subtle ways (especially in the UK), and a lot of republicans care (they should!) but virtually no democrats I know care.

I know the current administration (or X.com) is implementing the worst versions of these things, I don't support it at all, but my point is: there is good sense on both sides, yet also total nonsense on both sides.

That's my take from here in Canada, at least.
I’m going to give this a try. I build as a hobby, working my way up to building my own home, and it feels like cad software of all types is always too complicated for me. I shouldn’t need to be an expert in this tool to design a simple house that’s just a few boxes.

I generally don’t like AI, but I could see having a chat prompt “making changes to a car file” that I’ve described in my natural language could be a killer feature. Especially if you let me describe components like layers if a wall. Then use said wall in an area. Basically BIM level of detail.
Instead of clickbait (which phone? iOS? Android?) title cited, HN submission used more informative text from the article:

Zero-day exploit targeting Android USB kernel drivers identified in-the-wild
I'm a little confused by this post. Obviously it's easier to maintain a plain VM than managed services. That's why people are paying a lot more money to the cloud providers for managed services, so they don't have to do it themselves. What you're saying is that this is essentially a pointless endeavor? I don't think this statement is entirely uncontroversial, since managed services are the main reason for many companies to migrate to cloud.
If that’s the case, why doesn’t the Air Force tug up its fighters? It’d be a huge advantage.
I am okay letting Ukraine make their own decisions about their people and their land and willing to help them fight for their country. If someone invaded the US I would definitely fight before I gave it up so I don't begrudge someone wanting to keep their country (I'm always a bit surprised at Americans who expect them to want to give up. Where I grew up a lot of people owned guns and fantasized about fighting the good fight, whether against foreign tyranny or domestic. I've even seen people with a "Give me liberty or give me death" signs up in their house).

All that being said though it doesn't change anything about how the meeting went down. I've been lucky enough where I've literally never worked at a place where that would've been acceptable behavior, I've seen people talked to for less. To do that then double down more later was pretty embarrassing. Zelensky pushing back on their view on diplomacy in Ukraine didn't seem like a particular insult to me to make the meltdown make sense.

as sorta an aside: I was especially confused about them getting mad at Zelensky for telling them how to feel but as a native English speaker saying "you're going to feel it" means more you're going to feel the effects not you're going to feel a specific emotion (like after a hard workout at the gym if someone told me "you're going to feel it tomorrow" it would then be really weird for me to interpret that as them telling me how to feel emotionally). Trump responding he was going to feel strong was surreal and confusing to me. Especially with Zelensky as a non-native speaker it was weird to see Trump be the one struggling more with language. I can sorta understand agreeing with Trump politically but I just don't see how that was an acceptable or even normal way to react.

Anyway, that's a long post. I've watched the whole video and watching it just makes me feel like I've been taking crazy pills so I've thought about it a lot today.

Edit: and I forgot the whole thanking thing. Zelensky famously has thanked the US for aid and it seems like something they should know (even I was aware of it and confused while watching the video). But then Vance just pivoted to being mad about something else. Like people are talking about this like it's a policy dispute but I feel like I just watched some someone's villain arc on "The Bachelor", they seemed like reality TV characters.
Thanks for backing this up with more evidence. It's a graceful move to acknowledge a mistake.

I also thought the GP was just throwing fire. But after reading more into the matter, I'm a little too disgusted to dig anymore.
I've said it countless times. Mozilla is the downfall of Firefox. Get Firefox out of Mozilla and the current administration, what Firefox getting better and better.
Generative AI is nowhere close to AGI (formerly known as AI). It’s a neat parlour trick which has targeted the weaknesses of human beings in judging quality (e.g. text which is superficially convincing but wrong, portraits with six fingers). About the only useful application I can think of at present is summarising long text. Machine learning has been far more genuinely useful.

Perhaps it will evolve into something useful but at present it is nowhere near independent intelligence which can reason about novel problems (as opposed to regurgitate expected answers). On top of that Sam Altman in particular is a notoriously untrustworthy and unreliable carnival barker.
Believe me, everyone around you knew your views already.
I think it depends a lot on how research AI generated traffic counts towards these stats.

Also, if there is no answer yet on the web the AI may also not know it. Then these questions should still end up on SO.

I might add, that SO also could build their own chat / research UI. It would need to have some benefit over others, but I guess the community aspect of it alone would suffice...
RAG can be part of the solution which is unlikely that simple.
it doesn't even support ed25519 ssh keys