skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I have long since stopped being mad about this. I was mad about this in 2007 when iPhone was announced and I heard apps would be web only. I never owned an iPhone despite being one of Apple's biggest fanboys at the time. This policy is why I stopped using Apple products altogether. By 2011 I purchased my last apple product (a used Magic Mouse, I didn't even want to give them the satisfaction of a new purchase). By 2013 I was running Linux on my laptop and I never looked back.

Apple went from "We <3 open source!" and "Number one place to run Java!" to "30% of your revenue or else" and "Java is like a heavyweight ball and chain." That really hurt. It felt like a major betrayal.

But like every other major change in my life, it turned out for the best. I have a much better understanding of what's going on in my computer since leaving Apple. I have more freedom. I'm not mad anymore. I'm glad they pushed me away.
What's it called when you stole something from someone yesterday, then claim yourself the victim when they ask for it back today, because you already gave it to your kid?
Not quite. The server runs standalone, so you can use it just as you would use linux as part of your project without affecting your own code. The client libraries that become part of your code are MIT licensed. The reason we made this decision is to prevent AWS & co from copying all of our code without contributing to the project.
We use Nomad where I work and we LOVE it. Previous to Nomad we used K8s for several years which, at that point, allowed us to become cloud agnostic. With the move to Nomad about 3+ years ago, we were able to transition away from cloud and back to leased, bare metal machines. During our time with K8s, it didn't have a good bare-metal strategy with their ingress mechanism. In contrast, as we investigated Nomad, it was easy to deploy on pure metal without a hypervisor. The result of our migration to Nomad was having so many capable and far-less-expensive hosting options. Lastly, as part of our Nomad control plane, we also adopted Vault and Consul with great success.

I know there are horror stories around this acquisition and lots of predictions about what will happen, but only time will tell. On a minimum, it has been a delight to use the Hashicorp software stack along with the approach they brought to our engineering workflow (remember Vagrant?). These innovations and approaches aren't going away.
Yeah, it ads to a pattern of zero morals/ethics/standards. As someone whose mother was harassed for wearing a mask (she was dying of cancer during COVID) I will forever hate Spotify and Joe Rogan. And I'm a hippie live and let type. But I actively hate those two.

But enjoy your fake Spotify created muzak and algo optimized to the lowest royalty payout not your music tastes all while supporting Joe boy (leader of the last 250 comics).
> Motte: "They got caught getting benchmark data under the table"

> Bailey: "one is free to trust their "verbal agreement" that they did not train their models on that, but access they did have."

1. You’re confusing motte and bailey.

2. Those statements are logically identical.
How does pulse compare to reducto and gemini? Claude is actually pretty good at PDFs (much better than GPT)
There’s so much AI cruft on that page that I can’t even tell what the product is supposed to be.
Is Raycast open source at all? With nearly $50M of funding (most recently $30M series B last fall) I have to wonder about the long term sustainability and whether I want to invest my time and workflows into the whims of a VC backed “free forever” plan.

Alfred has been around for ages and I’m reasonably confident the developers aren’t going to screw me.
While it's true that LLMs are not strictly a formal system, they do operate on Turing-complete hardware and software, and thus they are still subject to the broader limitations of computability theory, meaning they cannot escape fundamental constraints like undecidability or incompleteness when attempting formal reasoning.
I'd hazard a guess that the person you're responding to is not so naïve that they believe this was unique to the Biden administration, but rather, is frustrated at what they feel is this kind of government tyranny often only being discussed through a partisan, one-sided lens that they might characterize as emphasizing this kind of stuff when conservative administrations do it but downplaying when progressive administrations do it.

I'm not necessarily supporting or defending that position, but we should at least strive to argue against the steelman version of our opponent's position, rather than the strawman position, no?
"Early testing doesn't show that it hallucinates less, but we expect that putting ["we expect it will hallucinate less"] nearby will lead you to draw a connection there yourself"."

The link, the link we are discussing shows testing, with numbers.

They say "early testing doesn't show that it hallucinates less", to provide a basis for a claim of bad faith.

You are claiming that mentioning this is out of bounds if it contains the word lying. I looked up the definition. It says "used with reference to a situation involving deception or founded on a mistaken impression."

What am I missing here?

Let's pretend lying means You Are An Evil Person And This Is Personal!!!

How do I describe the fact what they claim is false?

Am I supposed to be sarcastic and pretend They are in on it and edited their post to discredit him after the fact?
There are actually products you can buy right now that show text and color shows on LED spokes like that, although last time I tried you couldn't upload your own frames.
Icebar
This play is actually in Google's book. Microsoft is going along for the ride.
Had alpha access and can confirm that this was the case. Also stated it a few years ago [1].

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33556181

Many of the early core developers were my seniors at university and the story I heard was that the early Spotify music collection was the superset of the staff's personal music collections. It was great, but once they went legit I lost half of the content in my playlists and learned a valuable lesson about the superiority of files on disk and have not used Spotify since.

One anecdote that I have not stated before. In the early days FreeBSD support via Wine was great due to one of the core developers being a fellow FreeBSD user. Not sure how remarkable this is these days with Wine becoming so much more powerful, but it absolutely was in 2008.

I also remember sitting in the university staff lounge with some of said seniors and trying to mentally reverse engineer their implementation. Got most of it right; it was great fun and I owe said seniors a lot for "uplifting" me intellectually back in those days. Truly great people.
Musk would probably not tweet that if Slim was really involved with drug cartels, as insulting someone like that could end up with kinetic retaliation in physical world.
No way, I've found o3 mini to be terrible. It' not as good as R1/Sonnet 3.5.
It is their original play. However I think this is just “Chrome is going to do this anyway and we’re not about to write custom code to work around it.”
Mozilla has been pink washing itself for a decade.

This has paid off incredibly well for them since anyone pointing out that it's primary purpose was to enrich the CEO while letting her band of merry women support their pet causes was called everything from a fascist to an incel.

Till today the most blatantly farcical situation was that Mozilla funded women who code boot-camps while firing all the women who code inside Mozilla.

I guess people are finally waking up when Mozilla pulled an Ubuntu and decided that everything you do through their software is something they own actually.

They also flag and harass anyone who points out the grift.
No offense, I'm aware of how complex laws can be, but... Shouldn't that be obvious?
Or do you think you also grant a license to any pen manufacturer to help you write whatever it is that you are writing?
You're right, upon reflection, it seems there might be some misunderstandings here:

Motte and Bailey refers to an argumentative tactic where someone switches between an easily defensible ("motte") position and a less defensible but more ambitious ("bailey") position. My example should have been:

- Motte (defensible): "They had access to benchmark data (which isn't disputed)."

- Bailey (less defensible): "They actually trained their model using the benchmark data."

The statements you've provided:

"They got caught getting benchmark data under the table" (suggesting improper access)

"One is free to trust their 'verbal agreement' that they did not train their models on that, but access they did have."

These two statements are similar but not logically identical. One explicitly suggests improper or secretive access ("under the table"), while the other acknowledges access openly.

So, rather than being logically identical, the difference is subtle but meaningful. One emphasizes improper access (a stronger claim), while the other points only to possession or access, a more easily defensible claim.
Well to play the devils advocat, i think this is useful to have, at least for ‘Open’Ai to start off from to apply QLora or similar approximations.

Bonus they could even do some self learning afterwards with the performance improvements DeepSeek just published and it might have more EQ and less hallucinations than starting from scratch…

ie the price might go down big time but there might be significant improvements down the line when starting from such a broad base
And now without cutting it conveniently before the fun bit:

> Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you (in the way that most people think about “selling data“), and we don’t buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of “sale of data“ is extremely broad in some places, we’ve had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).

You appear to have cut off the part where they say that actually yeah they have to stop saying they don't sell your data because they are selling your data.
Where exactly? Land on the north shore isn’t empty nor is it cheap.
Actually this is Google's doing, you know the folks that do Chrome, that Chrome Edge builds upon.

https://www.pcworld.com/article/2595287/ublock-origin-is-off...

But by all means, keep the EEE story.
The Perceptron
> Completely different approaches that people actually think about for a while

I think this is very likely simply because there are so many smart people looking at it right now. I hope the bubble doesn't burst before it happens.
The license does not say that Mozilla owns information that the user inputs through Firefox. But the HN title does. If Mozilla owns the information then it would have no need for a license. Further, the license does not specify that it is perpetual. A Firefox user does not grant Mozilla perpetual rights to use the information. These rights can be terminated.
>giants like Meta, Google, and Apple must collect as much of your personal data as possible

Stopped reading there. If someone tries to sell a lie like that in their first five sentences, I can't trust anything they say.
Contexts has both hotkeys and a visual side bar that may do what you are asking.
The basic rule of thumb is, if a company knows something about you, then the government does too.

Which means they know everything you have posted, everywhere you've gone, everywhere you've worked, what you think politically, and almost certainly have AI profilers trying to "precog" you.

To say nothing of camera surveillance, gait analysis, facial recognition, license plate tracking, cell phone signal interceptors.

All it takes is for one authoritarian to walk in and turn the key and POOF we have perfect.

Are we in danger of that? Oh right, no politics on HN. Don't worry, be happy folks.
Comments such as yours are missing the point.

Mozilla's ToS applies for Firefox's use, and this is literally written by Mozilla themselves:

“Your use of Firefox must follow Mozilla’s Acceptable Use Policy”

There's no distinction between the browser and Mozilla's online services here.

---

And even if it were referring only to features such as “profile syncing” (and it doesn't refer only to that), does this mean that people can't have bookmarks to porn? And why would Mozilla care about how people use profile syncing at all? I thought it was e2e encrypted.
They didn't need a license before. Why should they need one now?
For anyone else who's now out of touch with this stuff as me:

AOT - Ahead Of Time.

Performance improvements looked really impressive until I later saw it was only partially supported:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/fundamentals/n...
Pretty much, yeah. Like everything is factually right, but I completely disagree with their method. So far, they’ve failed at each step.

There’s a very obvious “pro-religion” push going on across all social media as well, but it’s hard to pinpoint when/how it started. Not sure how far they’ll have to roll back women’s rights to get where they want to, but it’s incredibly sad to watch. Not sure how fathers with daughters are going to watch this happen in real time as well.
Well yeah I mentioned the last 8-9 years. But a lot of the shift already occurred with Bush: "Bush flipped 11 states that had voted Democratic in 1996: Arkansas, Arizona, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio, Tennessee, and West Virginia" (source Wikipedia); 8 of those have turned very much Republican since then.

So while the number of swing states has reduced a lot in 2016, the strength of republicans in the south hasn't changed a lot since 2000.
They didn't need a license to your data before. Why should they need it now?
This is a concern of mine as well. Alfred is also just so ridiculously lightweight and efficient compared to, well, everything these days. At 18MB on disk and sitting at 0% CPU and 42MB RAM on my machine right now with no spread of support processes, it feels almost like an endangered species Tiger-era Mac app that’s managed to survive to the current day.
My favorites:

To quickly find text, select some text and press ⌘E followed by ⌘G.

In save dialogs, press ⌘= to switch between the compact and expanded layout.

In save dialogs, press ~ to open a Go To File dialog prefilled with the home directory. Press / to open it prefilled with the root directory.

Hold Option while opening the Wi-Fi and Bluetooth menus to access extra options.

After copying a file, press ⌥⌘V to move the file instead of pasting a copy of it.

Terminal:

Press ⇧⌘A to select the output from the previous command.

Press ⌘L to clear the output from the previous command.

Press ⌃⌘V to paste and format text that is properly escaped for the shell.

Press ⌃T while a command is executing to view runtime statistics about the execution so far.
Steelman is "they meant what they said."

ie - no reinterpretation at all.

But even taking your reinterpretation at face value, it still couches the issue in terms of the "left" and "right" quasi-religions, no?
Bartender or dozer depending on what you want
Why US Navy ships are rusty
Somehow I was building distributed systems earlier in my career before I learned about queuing theory and learned this the hard way.

Nowadays with DB stuff I tend to get assigned new infra leads who see a DB cluster at 50% CPU utilization and think they can go down two instances sizes without severely impacting latency.
Without ublock origin, the internet is simply unbearable. The result is one of the following two: migrate to Firefox, or the biggest web detox ever
It's the NSA's job to do that domestically, it's just supposed to be firewalled by some hidden kangaroo court that absolutely doesn't do its job: FBI agents have been busted stalking women/exs several times.

Has been since 9/11. Remember, there's the omnipresent neverending war on terror.
I am likely bad at what I do, and am not a real developer, instead being someone who just uses "code" to look after infrastructure (or at least I was.)

I never felt a need to punch things out so efficiently that minute differences in time spent on or off keyboards, or my touch typing speed matter. Most of my time that consumes the budget allocated to me is honestly spent in researching and thinking. Once I get to writing the code, sure I could shave down the time to implement it by a few minutes each time, but its not enough for me to care about honestly.

That being said, I do use vim, but only because I was at one point a junior systems administrator and my CTO demanded to know why I was not already using it and instructed me it would be good practice to do so as its installed on everything we ran and so...vim it was. Not for efficiency, or because it empowered me but instead because it was there.

Now that I do more busy work instead such as discoveries, PIR's etc, sure my touch typing speed matters but its very different work.
Lying is defined as "used with reference to a situation involving deception or founded on a mistaken impression."

What am I missing here?

Those weren't curt summaries, they were quotes! And not pull quotes, they were the unedited beginning of each claim!
For crypto bros and those that excuse Brendan Eich
> hamster-treadmilling for mere pennies on every dollar of labour I produce

Oh, you noticed!

> structured to ensure that almost all of that generated wealth goes to those who already have obscene amounts of wealth

The most important function of business management is to ensure that value flows up the pyramid rather than down.

One advantage of capitalism vs. feudalism or prior systems is that the capitalist nobility who own the (land, factories, companies, robots, etc.) is neither directly hereditary nor based on military conquest. This allows it to claim fairness even though it is mathematically impossible for more than a few people at the bottom of the pyramid to ascend to the top.
> Press ⇧⌘/ to search all of the current app's menu items.

Shift command slash, got it.

> Press ⌃F2 to move keyboard focus to the application's menu bar. Start typing the first few letters of a menu title to jump to that menu.

Control F2? Control shift F2? None of those work on macOS Sequoiua.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe that there is no actual forum or discussion board on that site? Sure you can leave comments on [self-promotional] posts but it doesn't seem like you can post a question to other devs.
> Every IBM product I've ever used is universally reviled by every person I've met who also had to use it

During my time at IBM and at other companies a decade ago, I can name examples of this:

* Lotus Notes instead of Microsoft Office.

* Lotus Sametime Connect instead of... well Microsoft's instant messengers suck (MSN, Lync, Skype, Teams)... maybe Slack is one of the few tolerable ones?

* Rational Team Concert instead of Git or even Subversion.

* Rational ClearCase instead of Git ( https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1074580/clearcase-advant... ).

* Using a green-screen terminal emulator on a Windows PC to connect to a mainframe to fill out weekly timesheets for payroll, instead of a web app or something.

I'll concede that I like the Eclipse IDE a lot for Java, which was originally developed at IBM. I don't think the IDE is good for other programming languages or non-programming things like team communication and task management.
Or the third option "you can still make them work by clicking "Manage extension" and toggling it back"
Really depends on your use case. For low value tasks this is way too expensive. But for context, let’s say a court opinion is an average of 6000 words. Let’s say i want to analyze 10 court opinions and pull some information out that’s relevant to my case. That will run about $1.80 per document or $18 total. I wouldn’t pay that just to edify myself, but i can think of many use cases where it’s still a negligible cost, even if it only does 5% better than the 30x cheaper model.
The link has data.

The link shows a significant reduction.

grep hallucination, or, https://imgur.com/a/mkDxe78.
Possibly, it is defo important to keep tabs on how these patients fare after a few years. before we rush to ship this

From above link:

>A 25-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes became the first person to successfully receive a transplant of insulin-producing cells derived from her own reprogrammed stem cells
Exactly what I said.

So you're OK with YouTube hosting Joe Rogan while they also maintain a monopoly and not giving a damn in general, because they are too big for that.

https://www.youtube.com/@joerogan

Tell me, how does that work out for you?
If MS continues to support ManifestV2 in edge, I think the usage would increase.

Sadly they chose not.
If RHEL is becoming irrelevant, what distro will replace it for enterprise users?
Why aren't there (great) Design to Code tools?
I've been building apps for over a decade and the tools we have on the UI -> Code department seem to be lacking.

Even though I am rather fast with building UI using code, I wish the feedback loop was faster. With code you go type stuff -> save -> look at a different window to see if the UI looks right -> repeat.

On the other hand, visual tools tend to be graphics based instead of interface based. This means that while one is designing the app on tools like Figma, they are making something that looks like an app rather than designing an app.

This comes with its sets of problems while implementing the design. For example, there is no way to tell if the design will look right on different screen sizes and orientations.

I really wanted for a design tool that focuses on interfaces to exist so I built one for myself. It lets you design your app as if it was a graphics tool and it exports native mobile apps.

You can try it out for free at https://builtwithpaper.com?ref=hackernews
Can concur, I also switched
mostly to firmware and have enjoyed it much more. Though Rust firmware jobs are hard to come by.
There are so many hidden/obscure keyboard shortcuts in macOS, from time to time a post with a nice collection (and usually some hidden gems) appears on the front page here.

But I always wondered if there is a place where you can find all of them, for reference.
Agreed, but I suppose this is a tell. I think they’re trying to place this into a separate class of models.

I.e., we know it might not be as good as 3.7, but it is very friendly and maybe acts like it knows more things.
It does deserve scrutiny, but historically speaking swapping from legacy vendors to SpaceX or Starlink tends to result in cost savings for taxpayers.

I would bet that is also the case in this instance, and the media’s outage needs to be tempered until they do the leg work to actual understand the cost effectiveness of this change, and how the decision was made.
https://livebench.ai/#/
Best non reasoning model on livebench (and ranks above gemeni thinking)
I used to work at HashiCorp, and was a hiring manager. I know there's reasons why candidates might get given vague answers on why we're not proceeding, but I'd have been horrified to learn someone we interviewed got ghosted. Someone who was so far into the process that they did five interviews?! Inexcusable.

I'm so sorry that happened to you :( I hope you found somewhere else that filled you with excitement.
>Opinions can’t be lies

But, they can be based on false info or deliberately misleading reasoning, or stated in bad faith with the intent to deceive.
I mean, sure, stipulate that. But there isn't even a kangaroo court for a service hosted in Europe.
Amazing, I saw you already connected with my cofounder over chat, looking forward to it!
Personally I find it frustrating they called it "agentic" parsing when there's nothing agentic about it. Not surprised the quality is lackluster.