skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In return we can replace all the McDonalds and KFCs with European alternatives, and kick out Meta and the rest of the tech imperialism.

Don't pretend America gets nothing out of its role as global hegemon.
Putin obviously. And no, "formally" he is surely a elected president. Just one who talks about and compares himself to the great emperors of russian past a lot and acts pretty much the same.
Nope. It seems like legalspeak to say "we sell your data" while making it sound like they don't.
Either they get the island, or they play good guy and sell more stuff everywhere bc everyone hates America more.

Trump loves speaking about cards, Xi is the guy holding all the cards, and keep you guessing.
It doesn't have to be. I don't think there are sufficient empirical studies to suggest writing by hand is better in some dimensions than typing.

I prefer it myself for several reasons. First, it forces me to filter the present jumble of ideas in my head into a linear progression on the page. Second, it helps me resist the temptation to edit myself before I have finished. I tend to be more mindful and focused when writing long-form.

Writing digitally, which I often do, comes with the temptation to edit and succumb to distraction before I've finished a thought. It allows me to explore many branches quickly... but quantity is often not what I'm after.

I think what you consider sufficient has more to do with your personal process and what you hope to achieve with your writing, if that makes sense.
For a second I thought this was by Chuck Tingle rather than Arms Control Wonk
Say it results in a global nuclear war. That might be the worst case scenario.

What's the dollar value of that?
First he wanted to hold Stewart to journalistic standards as a comedian that Carlson was not meeting as an actual journalist and got utterly destroyed in response. He then called for an emergency commercial break, and after the break tried to bait Stewart for not being funny in their interview, despite being completely responsible for the topic. Got utterly destroyed again, and their show got cancelled.
If you use Russian recruitment and army size numbers, you get much more realistic figures https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja6-espHVSE. Russia is up to ~700k to 800k casualties Russia has lost ~3-4x more people than Ukraine so far.
IMO, taking personal shots or in this case escorting Zelensky out because he pushed back is folding. That's not strength, it's petulant child energy who didn't get their way. You saw the same thing in the debates over crowd size.
I agree that this is a huge breath of fresh air because you are (1) actually reading what Mozilla said and (2) making sober nuanced distinctions absent from most criticisms.

But that said, these reassurances run into a "who ordered that" problem. No advocate for privacy was ever advocating on behalf of anonymized data any more than personally identifying data. Anonymous averaging over interests of groups still involves privacy compromises; and metrics, fingerprints and learning algorithms can mix and match that in ways that still cross the line. Abstracted profiling still works, and digs deeper than you might suspect (I recall the netflix data that could predict interests across different categories, like people watching House of Cards also liking It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia). Preferences can hang together in a measurable way, which is exactly why ad companies want them.

It's also just part of the long slow, death by one thousand cuts transformation into a company that doesn't have categorical commitments to privacy.
The problem is not that the U.S. is trying to negotiate for peace, the problem is that the administration is doing a hilariously bad job of it by giving up all leverage right off the bat.
The U.S. is strong because of our own power, but also because of our many many friends with a shared worldview. We use the word "interests" to cover how our friends help us in every situation, big or small.

For example, the US needs many raw materials and manufactured goods. Our economy is extremely strong because we get these easily and with little friction. Other countries trust our trade deals so they enter into them willingly. And so whenever the US needs a new import, we get it quickly and cheaply. As a concrete example, NVidia gets prime access to foundries and components. Sure, they spend money on it, but our "interests" ensure that the process is frictionless. Any other country would have a harder time.

We also have near universal military access. No other country even comes close. We nearly have permission in advance to go anywhere. If US shipping is interrupted, no one complains when our navy goes and uninterrupted it. In fact we are welcomed. If a US citizen is taking hostage, governments from the area want to help us.

Also, maybe you've noticed that no one is even close to attacking the US. We are so strong that it would be suicide, and that's partly because of our own strength, but also because of our many allies who would back us up.

Finally, we have moral interests. I believe everyone should live in a system based on laws, should elect their own leaders, and should have basic freedoms. The more we spread liberalism and democracy the better the world is.

Sure, you can nitpick about counterexamples. The Iraq war is a perfect example of messing this up. And not every country loves us.

But if you cannot see that the majority of countries are overwhelmingly friendly towards the US, and that we get enormous military and economic benefits, then you are blind.
They literally can't have an election until the war ends:

* millions of Ukrainians in the occupied territories
* 1000km frontline that is extremely thin in places. should they pull troops off the line to vote, or run ballot boxes to the trenches?
* their Constitution forbids it
* the Russians will attack polling places, possibly killing hundreds

Britian didn't have an election for 10 years because of WWII, so it's not like it's unprecedented for a democracy to put elections on hold during an existential crisis.
I always find it interesting that Americans will rant on about how oppressive China is because you can't talk about a particular event (Tiananmen Square massacre), while not batting an eye that mention one of the most prominent thinkers in Western history will get everything else you say absolutely invalidated.

Again, a perfect examples... somebodies writings on ideology.
Okay, so when you said official, you meant unofficial. Got it. I'm with you completely on the rest of it.
It should really be up to Mozilla to make the licensing of their products and the terms of use of their services clear and unambiguous. If users have to figure out how to square Mozilla's legal terms with Mozilla's other legal terms, they've failed.
> Israel is a solitary, functioning, modern liberal democracy surrounded by repressive, autocratic states. Until about a minute ago, supporting liberal democracy was important to all US administrations.

IDK about functioning or modern or liberal, but the rest seems about right.
The product in the case is exactly what YC and similar investors surf on, but I think primarily due to the video being shot and scripted unconventionally merged with some other social factors, made YC to delete the post.
You are echoing Russian propaganda. European states are not expecting money back from Ukraine.
This was a seminal review in psychiatry that I am fully in agreement with but there are a lot of easy to draw conclusions from this review that are false.

SRRI efficacy for one - The nature of SSRIs is that they are highly effective for some patients and useless/detrimental to others. This does not lend itself well to traditional measures of effect size. For those in the comments pointing out SSRIs low effect size, note that the effect size of morphine for pain is only 0.4 (SSRIs score 0.3). For instance, drugs that significantly improve 60-100% of patients are clinically insignificant under various guidelines. I can expound upon the various methodological reasons this is the case if there is interest.

This is not to say that SSRIs are good. There is no doubt they are overprescribed, have underdiscussed side effects, and are barely understood by their prescribers. I was severely depressed with suicidal ideation since I was 6 years old until I was young adult. I have pored over the psychiatric scientific literature for many years now, and I will say that understanding the sociological reasons for depression was much more effective at helping me than learning about the biological or pharmacological aspects. If you are in a similar position, I cannot recommend enough reading Crazy Like Us: The Globalization of the American Psyche by Ethan Watters as a starting point.
I think it's a fine rule of thumb but what does Putin have to gain from negotiating with Zelenskyy who he is seen as a Western puppet orchestrated as legacy of US intel agency involvement? (Which we admitted is true…)

People in this thread are completely incapable of seeing any legitimacy in any Russian concerns about Ukraine.
There's 3 choices. Both placebos and SSRI perform better than doing nothing.
I believe the clip of the interview disproves that point. If money was the problem (or, more generally, a protracted investment in a conflict perceived as senseless) then a sobering talk would be the way - think of the speech that Biden gave when he announced that the US was withdrawing from Afghanistan for similar reasons, fully aware of what the likely consequences would be.

This interview, on the other hand, has the US VP talking on top of a head of state while chastising him for not being grateful enough while pressuring him to take a deal that would effectively surrender Ukraine to US and Russian interests. Whatever the objective of this meeting was, "a fair result for Ukraine and its dead" did not seem to be it.
I don't see `tsai` in there either
> Yeah, no; you found something the church called a sin that you could not, or did not, want to overcome.

what a convenient all-purpose dismissal of any experiences that challenge your view
It is much better on Android
The trouble with seeing depression solely as a brain malfunction (2014)
> 49.91%

"First past the post" means "first to get above 50%". He didn't win enough of the vote to be elected.
Huh. I wouldn't have expected free software and libertarianism to converge on this one.

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.en.html

It's either a horseshoe or a bipartisan line
It can run ublock origin right now, and will be able to run ublock origin lite into the future.

No chromium-based browser currently plans to keep MV2 support. It's just not feasible for a small group to keep it maintained ontop of the inevitable breaking changes that will be introduced in upstream over time.

If this bothers you, use a real browser that isn't sourced from an ad company.

Otherwise, you'll be getting exactly what you should expect, and nothing more.
EU is more and more open to the idea of paying for the Ukraine war from the Russian frozen assets ($200 billions or so). The big guns (France and Germany) are still opposed though...

[0] https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-ukraine-peace-talks-donal...
Dave here, founder of ToDesktop. I've shared a write-up: https://www.todesktop.com/blog/posts/security-incident-at-to...

This vulnerability was genuinely embarrassing, and I'm sorry we let it happen. After thorough internal and third-party audits, we've fundamentally restructured our security practices to ensure this scenario can't recur. Full details are covered in the linked write-up. Special thanks to Eva for responsibly reporting this.
I love Zelensky and I think he's a hero, but I don't think he did well at all. People think he did well because they love him, but objectively I think he made quite a few mistakes besides the one you mention.

The first one is getting emotional in the first place. His team and Ukraine's intelligence services should have spent weeks interrogating and trying to provoke him in order to desensitize him to this kind of shit. Trump, Vance and Musk are primarily trolls and they should be dealt with as such.

He should not have interrupted Vance answering him either. That was fatal.

He needed to stay calm and slow. He did better than any of us could ever have done, but it wasn't quite enough for this situation. He could have looked a lot stronger and I think we need everything we can possibly get in the situation we're all in right now.

I want to highlight this comment too: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43211604
The stand they took and what they created is what has led to where we are today. To disregard their advice is at the very least disrespectful.

Regardless of where a set of ideas come from, if you disagree with them, argue against them head on and not with redirections to other topics.
It's actually possible to be embarassed for both.
I have the complete opposite X experience

I have a new account, I only follow ai, coding and tech accounts

My following page is amazing! Not one dumb thing in my face. The for you feed is garbage but I never go there
A plane can take you or your cargo to the other side of the world in a day, missiles can go much faster than that, and communications are instantaneous. The world is still a big place but it's naive to ignore the facts of technological interconnectedness.
"NATO expansion" is one point of view. Another is: a sovereign country (Ukraine) prefers the west over Russia and wants to join it.

So what’s the propaganda now?
Republicans have been delaying approval of military aid to Ukraine during the past couple of years, tying it to Israel (which itself is morally wrong). Now a Republican president has the audacity to accuse Ukraine of not winning - precisely because of lack of substantial military aid. Glad Zelensky called Trump out on his bullshit.
US was always a bully Trump is doing overtly what US has been doing covertly using CIA etc for decades. Actually Trump is more honest than previous US administrations as those would have killed Zelensky and then blamed it on China or Russia if he was not willing to do what they want.
What I mean is that attackers from either side will take a lot more casualties than defenders.
Why do some many people think enabling invaders is "supporting peace"? Chamberlainism used be so verboten.
Him on Oprah then is night and day compared to now.
>I think the key is the "about you" part, not the "selling data" part

They're certainly attempting to articulate that as a conceptual distinction, but I don't think that division is as real as would be implied by trying to separate the one thing into two different words. Aggregated data is "about you" too, in many of the senses that matter in the context of privacy, and I would reject attempts at conceptualizing this into two things to imply otherwise.
Gold? It’s not the 19th century anymore and if you look at list of arms manufacturers you’ll find a lot of familiar names who take euros:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_modern_armament_manufa...
It’s also hard to imagine something which provides a better value than accessible weather data. Farming, construction, shipping, flights, etc.

Then again, good weather data might support climate change arguments, so it has to go.
Sounds good, but if you want activism, then maybe a venture capitalist site is not the best place to organize it.
I used Songbird from roughly when it came out and one of the features that I like was using mp3 blogs as playlists, then downloading the files I liked. I'm sure most of them are gone now unless I happen to still have a harddrive around from that time. But I found so much music that way. I'm not sure how I found the blogs now? Maybe that was when they would list the blogs they linked to on the side, or the blogs the author liked. I remember coming across communities of Andalusian punk, Finnish metal, Norwegian electronic music, and digitized Soviet rock/punk. Now I look back and wonder if those mp3s were there to download because streaming wasn't quite accessible enough. That was probably just a 2-4 year period I'm thinking of, maybe 2005~2009?
I am not going to tell them they can't, they can do as they see fit, of course.

It is a very subjective topic, however. I might save my family even if it meant the death of hundreds of people, or not, it is a moral dilemma for sure. I do not have an answer.

Some people may believe "less people dying" is always favorable.
As far as the US and allies are concerned, this is very simply a war for the protection of Ukraine's sovereignty. Now that the US changed into a wannabe imperialistic nation, the picture is not so clear.
Why does it use Neko the cursor chasing cat? Why the goth color scheme? These are stylistic choices, there is no explaining them.
Experimentation.

I have heard that LÖVE is a great engine for prototyping game mechanics. You know; have some colored circles and some boxes and see if your game mechanics pan out (if you're doing artwork then you're doing prototyping all wrong). Hand your prototype out to friends and family and see what they think.

Starting with the graphics, sound, etc. feels rewarding but ends up being a really slow way to fail. Your game should be fun without the polish.
Fisher had said that he was seeking to complicate the game-- which is something that black wants to do, in general-- add uncertainty for both sides.

In practice, the move only added uncertainty for black. White faced easy choices, and black difficult ones.

I didn't disagree that Fisher thought the move was safe and miscalculated. Indeed, he didn't even miscalculate badly-- engines think they can hold the position.

I'm asserting that the move fails because it made the subsequent game more complicated for Fisher without imposing an equal penalty on his opponent. It made a bad miscalculation almost inevitable.
Actually there was nothing in the article about why Apple can't.
How can you afford an indefinite war against a nuclear power? He will just drag you into a quagmire, which always works against the west. I'm genuinely curious what strategy Europe will have here to squeeze Russia.
Could you share the source you found please?

Not that i’m doubting you. Just that i also did some poking around and found this statement published in 2013: “The Falcinelli OOKP (MOOKP), where adequately performed, is now recognised internationally as giving the best, long-term visual and retention results among all keratoprostheses, especially in a dry eye.” [1]

Curious if the difference between what you found and what i found is time (perhaps what was in 2013 the best threatment has been superseeded by better ones since), or differences in opinions among practicioners. Especially because the “where adequately performed” sentence part makes my spider sense tingle about the one i found.

1: https://www.nature.com/articles/sj.bdj.2013.383
just the style of their blog
I really wish this other typewriter got a chance to enter mass production--it basically contained an ahead-of-its-time input method akin to modern Chinese/Kanji/Hanja on computers, rather than require hunting through 1000+ tiny characters on a grid.

https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the-uncanny-keyboard/
There are no “arguments” being raised here. An argument would be something like “America relies on Ukraine as a key source of XYZ so it would be bad if Russia took it over.” Can you even tell me without looking how much U.S.-Ukraine trade there was before the war?

All these platitudes about “interests” and “soft power” seem to be predicated on an assumption that nobody is willing to articulate. Are we all expected to be Francis Fukuyama cultists here who take it as axiomatic that it’s in america’s interest to defend the borders of european countries? If that’s the argument, then I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree. Because I happen to think liberals have actually been right on that issue since the 1970s.
The diary is fine, but have you seen org-mode?
My goodness. So much third-party risk upon risk and lots of external services opening up this massive attack surface and introducing this RCE vulnerability.

From an Electron bundler service, to sourcemap extraction and now an exposed package.json with the container keys to deploy any app update to anyone's machine.

This isn't the only one, the other day Claude CLI got a full source code leak via the same method from its sourcemaps being exposed.

But once again, I now know why the entire Javascript / TypeScript ecosystem is beyond saving given you can pull the source code out of the sourcemap and the full credentials out of a deployed package.json.
What do you mean with basically accepted that demand? Give me a source and I will stand corrected. I have stayed away from discussing this war for a long time since the outcome is pretty predictable given my point of view, so I forgot a lot of the details from when I carefully researched the topic. But as far as I remember, there was not hint of willingness to accommodate Russian demands.
It may be too FPS specific, but I always got a lot out of the in-game audio commentaries on Valve's games (HL2: Episodes, (since 2024) HL2 itself, Portal 2 etc.) There is some great analysis of player psychology in the recordings that I think would be universal across games.

As a game developer myself (hobbyist), I sincerely wish you the best of luck. Games are hard, but they're worth the effort!

(And also for what it's worth, my first forays into game development was met with lots of critical comments (some helpful, some not). It's part of the process, but don't let it discourage you!)
There won't be a revolution, who do you think the gun owners all voted for? As long as Trump doesn't touch their guns, they aren't going to do a damned thing.
As an American, I'm disgusted.

Not only does Ukraine deserve respect and support, but the US's elected crazies are damaging the country. Soft power is real, and smart, power
You know, at this point I've seen so much self-promotional material arising from Google in the form of bold claims and titles in research papers that I no longer take immediate interest in them but instead wait for other more trustworthy sources to vet whether it's actually something of substance. This is a good example whose value can only be assessed by others who don't benefit from pushing a product.
Take the spoiler warning seriously. The landing page is fun to play with (once you find the tools in the top right corner) and has at least one amazing/bizarre toy in it.
But you don't go say it to the US President, least of all Trump, in front of cameras!
My theory for a while now has been that we hold Mozilla to a higher standard and that's why they get flak and lose users over what others get away with. They're supposed to be better, so when they do something you'd expect from Google, people go to... Google? It makes no logical sense but this keeps happening. Or if not Google then some other thing with a questionable business model, or something that depends on Mozilla continuing to maintain Firefox

Same goes for, eh, everything else actually: from political parties to non-profits, any time something isn't executed perfectly or some compromise needs to be made, people pull the rug by moving away (votes, donations, spreading the word, whatnot) and we're more in the hands of the orgs we wanted to oppose than before. Bathwater baby sports. We should hold olympics for them
Yah, I'm not saying that a way to figure out the "difficulty of position" is to simply count the number of "only moves" or a volatility measure. There's sometimes a sequence of obvious trades to make, and that's hardly a difficult position.

It's hard to capture "obvious". One metric is how far you need to look down the eval tree to know a move is good, but even that is flawed.
it’s a blog. people regularly use their personal sites to write in a tone and format that they are fond of. i only normally feel like i see this style from people who were on the internet in the 90s. i’d imagine we would see it even more if phones and auto correct didn’t enforce a specific style. imagine being a slave to the shift key. it can’t even fight back! i’m more upset the urls aren’t actually clickable links.