skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
To be fair to RUM pricing, there are also horrible incentives for workflow invocation based pricing models, or workspace count models.
Why does the United States need a “left” party at all?
Surely that's why you would read the article, sentence one leaves literally no doubt.
Exactly. It's the same way that having a deformed jaw, hydrocephalus, and leg braces equates to being absolute ruler over an empire colonizing half the world.
Wouldn't shadow president imply that he's acting within the shadows and out of sight? This is definitely not an apt description of what's going on. Co-president is much more apropos.
They are pretty useful tools. Do yourself a favor and get a $100 free trial for Claude, hook it up to Aider, and give it a shot.

It makes mistakes, it gets things wrong, and it still saves a bunch of time. A 10 minute refactoring turns into 30 seconds of making a request, 15 seconds of waiting, and a minute of reviewing and fixing up the output. It can give you decent insights into potential problems and error messages. The more precise your instructions, the better they perform.

Being unreliable isn't being useless. It's like a very fast, very cheap intern. If you are good at code review and know exactly what change you want to make ahead of time, that can save you a ton of time without needing to be perfect.
Profoundly inverted sense of morality. Don’t know what can be done about it.
> Although static-location architectures offer developers the most low-level control over their system, in practice they are difficult to implement robustly without distributed systems expertise.

This is the understatement of the article. There are two insanely difficult things to get right in computers. One is cryptography, and other is distributed systems. I'd argue the latter is harder.

The reason simple enough to understand. In any program the programmer has to carry in his head every piece of state that is accessible at any given point, the invariants that apply to that state, and the code responsible for modifying that state while preserving the invariants. In sequential programs the code that can modify the shared state is restricted to inner loops and functions you call, and you have to verify every modification preserves the invariants. It's a lot. The hidden enemy is aliasing, and you'll find entire books written on the counter measures like immutable objects, function programming, and locks. Coordinating all this is so hard only a small percentage of the population can program large systems. I guess you are thinking "but of a lot of people here can do that". True, but we are a tiny percentage.

In distributed systems those blessed restrictions a single execution thread gives us on what code can access shared state goes out the window. Every line that could read or write the shared state has to be considered, whether its adjacent or not, whether you called it here or not. The state interactions explode in the same way interactions between qubits explode. Both explode beyond the capability of human minds to assemble them all in one place. You have to start forming theorems and formulating proofs.

That worst part is newbie programmers are not usually aware this explosion has taken place. That's why experienced software engineers give the following advice on threads: just don't. You don't have a feel for what will happen, your code will appear to work when you test it while being rabbit warren of disastrous bugs that will likely never be fixed. It's why Linux RCU author Paul McKenney is still not confident his code is correct, despite being one of the greatest concurrent programming minds on the planet. It's why Paxos is hard to understand despite being relatively simple.

Expecting an above average programmer to work on a distributed system and not introduce bugs without leaning on one of one of the "but it is inefficient" tools he lists is an impossible dream. A merely experienced average has no hope. It's hard. Only a tiny, tiny fraction of the programmers on the planet can pull it off kind of hard.
Musl Libc: input-controlled out-of-bounds write primitive in iconv
Meta is firing about 20 employees for leaking
Why do governments and such always time those purchases to be done at the very top of 4 year cycle?

They should be buying these "reserves" at the beginning of 2023. Now they would have 5x return and 7x in next few months.
lovely comment, it is spelled balatro by the way.
Future contracts short term. Future brokers often have good margins of intraday hold. And with micro contracts one does need to take huge risks.

Futures are leveraged tho, so it’s kinda like a table saw, you can be very efficient with it but it can also remove your thumb as efficiently
Thanks! The primary reason is because we want folks to be able to run this locally and contribute to the project / fix issues as they come up. This is much harder when you have a black box tool and rely on our small team for support.
>Even in 3D GA, some mixed-grade elements are not invertible.

This paper [1] claims to have inverses for general multivectors up to a certain dimension, but I've never needed them and haven't dived into it. I'm curious what the applications would be for general multivectors, I've never come across them in practice.

1 - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00963...
It's not a generic novel treatment against any and all cancers, as much as the headline would lead you to conclude.
To me, it feels like a PR stunt in response to what the competition is doing. OpenAI is trying to show how they are ahead of others, but they price the new model to minimize its use. Potentially, Anthropic et al. also have amazing models that they aren't yet ready to productionize because of costs.
I'm really not sure who this model is for. Sure the vibes may be better, but are they 2.5x as much as o1 better? Kinda feels like they're brute forcing something in the backend with more hardware because they hit a scaling wall.
self healing is already a feature :)
I had almost exactly the opposite experience, although my dataset was pretty small.

We wanted to store a graph in postgres and ended up writing some recursive queries to pull subgraphs then had NetworkX layered over it to do some more complex graph operations. We ended up doing that for a short while but then switched to Neo4j because of how comparatively easy it was to write queries (although the Python support for Neo4j was severely lacking). Never really stressed it out on dataset size though.

I did manage to crash Redis' graph plugin pretty quickly when I was testing that.
Well, there's a lot in the news today about the FAA cancelling a 2.4 billion dollar contract with Verizon and awarding it to Starlink.

So look like Musk may have gotten a good deal with the couple hundred million he spent to help get Trump elected.
...because there are plenty of people in the United States with "leftist" views and they deserve to be represented?
Mission in Nigeria: Protecting the Pangolin
Or you could root for Elon and Trump to be successful in taking out the cartels. Truly one of the greatest evils facing america today.
I believe he got just got either Ipilimumab and Nivolumab as a combo therapy or Pembrolizumab. He's a researcher who focuses on neo-adjuvant (use therapy before resection) therapy in melanomas. It was a good gamble to try the same paradigm in Glioblastomas
There are ten thousand examples I want to give of why you're wrong. We have to start somewhere so here's a favourite, the "universal projection formula":

(A.B)/B

Projects any A onto any B, in any number of dimensions and with any signature (eg hyperbolic/Euclidean/elliptic). A and B can be lines, planes, points, and with a conformal or anti de Sitter metric a sphere or hyperboloid etc ("blades").

It works because A.B is dimension independently the object "orthogonal to A and containing B or vice versa". And division by B will intersect that orthogonal object with B.

Concise, intuitive, and powerful. What's the linear algebra formula you'd consider to be comparable?
Something that I was quite surprised not to see in this story were questions about mental illness. There’s obviously a huge modern tendency to medicalise things, but the link to the grandfather made me wonder. What we call mental illnesses like depression, schizophrenia, anxiety are all obviously extremes on a continuum. (I’d love to see evidence to the contrary, but seizures or infarcts are probably one of the few binarized events related to the brain and even those have micro-versions.)
> Do people forget that?

If you mean people on HN, maybe not. If you mean people in general, then a lot of people don't know it at all let alone forgetting it. The vast majority of people do not pay attention to what CEOs do, if they even know who they are. The vast majority of people don't want to be tuned in like that and are using social media to deliberately check out. It's one of the reasons they are so susceptible to the algos
How many of those valves do you think they sell? It’s likely in the hundreds or thousands, so a very low volume item.

How many of them fail to pass the stringent quality tests? The price includes all of the defective valves that failed QA/QC testing.

You still need all of the engineering and tooling, but the costs are spread across a small number of units vs a larger volume product.
not only that but he historically never really took much of a hit for his idiotic impulsive life choices
I'm actually a fan of what the team at Quadratic is building. It's definitely the more mature product with a robust Python implementation and a well-designed interface that bridges spreadsheets and code. Their stack appears to be built on Rust, which likely gives them performance advantages.

Probly is earlier stage and more minimalist, but we're tackling the same fundamental problem. Our specific focus is on making data analysis a fully autonomous process powered by AI - where you can describe what you want to learn from your data and have the system figure out the rest.
I bought beos :D
>generate $11.8 billion in sales.

This was an investment worth twice that, and you think it is not of "real impact"? Care to expand on your thinking?
*retail investors

Retail will always be holding the bag. This is known.
Good call. Here's the same exact prompt run against:

GPT-4o: https://gist.github.com/simonw/592d651ec61daec66435a6f718c06...

GPT-4o Mini: https://gist.github.com/simonw/cc760217623769f0d7e4687332bce...

Claude 3.7 Sonnet: https://gist.github.com/simonw/6f11e1974e4d613258b3237380e0e...

Claude 3.5 Haiku: https://gist.github.com/simonw/c178f02c97961e225eb615d4b9a1d...

Gemini 2.0 Flash: https://gist.github.com/simonw/0c6f071d9ad1cea493de4e5e7a098...

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite: https://gist.github.com/simonw/8a71396a4a219d8281e294b61a9d6...

Gemini 2.0 Pro (gemini-2.0-pro-exp-02-05): https://gist.github.com/simonw/112e3f4660a1a410151e86ec677e3...
Factorio is not a game, it's a lifestyle.
It's never just a troll, though. Republicans test the waters for changes they genuinely want to make, and whenever there's significant enough blow-back, it's always "we're just joking, why are you guys so upset?".

We saw that as recently as the last election - some of the project 2025 stuff was leaked, people got upset about it, and then suddenly, Trump's campaign was quick to disavow any connection to or even knowledge of project 2025. Once he got into office, he started running through the project 2025 playbook exactly as written.
Hope you can justify that during sprint planning / standup
It streams the output. See animated demo here (bottom image on the page) https://simonwillison.net/2025/Feb/27/introducing-gpt-45/
Time to archive as many links as possible. I know some people who have used Mathb.in to draft (or publish!) short, insightful articles on various topics in mathematics. Since I last read these articles as an undergraduate student, it may take a while to find the links. Thankfully, there are at least two weeks worth of time to find them.

Thank you susam for 13 years of continuous service.
If that's your worst investment, you're doing great. I bought stock in HashiCorp. I also bought stock in EBET, for a return of -100.00%.
This is so cool, thanks for sharing. Can you talk about why you made it and why you made it free / open?
Our GitHub has been published on the Marketplace - https://github.com/marketplace/cloud-avenue-data-stack-insig...

I hope it will make it easier for others to try.
Okay - but EXACTLY how wrong (or not correct) is the second answer?

Please tell me precisely on a 0-1 floating scale, where 0 is "yes" and "no".
Thunderbird does what it says on the box. It just works.
It can also now talk to Exchange servers.
Once you have the OpenAPI specs, you can build an MCP server on top of that. Automatically. You don't have them ? There's MITM2Swagger[0] that will do it's best to infer it. Probably you'll need some manual adjustments, but still. And MCP servers can now be integrated with any LLM, not only Anthropic. While I appreciate your approach, how do you fight the MCPs?

[0] https://github.com/alufers/mitmproxy2swagger
I owned one, actually. It was very hard to find at retail. ATI still dominated the integrated video card market, with S3 and Matrox and Diamond et. al. filling out the rest. NVIDIA was a notable upstart, and the RIVA actually looked really great on paper. But like I said it couldn't break through the Voodoo's lock on the the game market, nor ATI's control of the OEM channel. It kept the company from failing, but that's about as far as it goes.

Again, a year later the TNT changed things for NVIDIA (and the Geforce 256 a year after that changed everything). But the 128 was forgettable in hindsight.
A billionaire Asperger high on ketamine, can't stay out of the limelight for a single day, and for every stupid thought, media gives him some more attention. It's a vicious cycle.
I don't doubt that's often the case, but there's still a big difference between a general statement and a specific claim.
Terrestrial networks have their issues, but they don't have to continuously launch. Curious to know which is better for the environment.
That article is dated 26 Feb 2025, not weeks ago.
You're mostly correct but immunotherapies do work for a many different type of cancer. The issue is differences in tumor biology plays a major factor. The even bigger caveat is that given a sufficient amount of tumor mutational burden (TMB), immunotherapies are found to be effective for any solid tumor. Granted most patients don't have the sky had TMBs needed for it to be effective
> feel free to copy and claim as your own.

That's a nice sentiment, but I'd encourage you to add a license or something. The basic "something" would be adding a canonical URL into the spreadsheet itself somewhere, along with a notification that users can do what they want other than removing that URL. (And the URL would be described as "the original source" or something, not a claim that the particular version/incarnation someone is looking at is the same as what is at that URL.)

The risk is that someone will accidentally introduce errors or unsupportable claims, and people with the modified spreadsheet won't know that it's not The spreadsheet and so will discount its accuracy or trustability. (If people are trying to deceive others into thinking it's the original, they'll remove the notice, but that's a different problem.) It would be a shame for people to lose faith in your work because of crap that other people do that you have no say in.
DeepSeek's Promise and Peril: A Closer Look at Its AI Dominance
It's not hard at all to get good uA/MHz numbers, it just increases die size and cost. You can push it pretty far by tuning the synthesis, for example the same Cortex-M4 core on the Ambiq Apollo3 Blue advertises "6 μA/MHz executing from flash or RAM at 3.3 V"

These are magnitudes of difference across the Espressif, Nordic, and Ambiq parts. The difference in price is also proportional.

https://ambiq.com/apollo3-blue/
"When you upload or input information through Firefox, you grant us a license"
I heard this line of code `Sound_Effect(VOC_TANYA_LAUGH, Coord);`
It's nearly Apple's 50th anniversary. I've thought for a while now that a limited run of the rainbow logo on their products would be a great (and lucrative) celebration gimmick.
Yes, all of it is solvable. I think my point is that is my impression (at least from the algo trading subreddit) that many approach it as a computer problem, which it is if one is doing what Jane Street is doing and has that kind of execution in the ns scale… but for retail traders I think one needs to learn what trading actually is, what market inefficiencies are there, usual behaviors of markets, money managements, psychology of trading, etc. in order to do algo trading well.

Props to whoever can work that out by themselves.

There’s a guy that supposedly has a couple of live trading bots trading live money on YouTube. I’ve watched his stuff and don’t really have reason to not believe him since I can look at the charts myself and see that they are indeed live. His tutorial of mql5 is also very interesting. Algo bot programming is kind of just event programming. When a bar closes or on a tick… buy? sell? do thing? That’s all it is! The trick is in when to buy/sell/do nothing.

https://www.youtube.com/live/QfDysU5eyM4?si=mvjN8dj6IHMlODR6
No worries, that makes sense!

And thanks for contributing :)
USAID purchases have been a significant stabilizer of domestic food market prices.
Didn't seem to realize that "Still more coherent than the OpenAI lineup" wouldn't make sense out of context. (The actual comment quoted there is responding to someone who says they'd name their models Foo, Bar, Baz.)
Funny you should suggest that it seems like a revised system prompt:
https://chatgpt.com/share/67c0fda8-a940-800f-bbdc-6674a8375f...
Well said. 100% agree
While I encourage everyone to opt out of the sensationalized news cycle and prioritize their own mental health, people who aren't paying attention aren't better informed, because the news is actively being censored by their billionaire owners, so it takes a lot of effort to be fully informed, and no, remembering a few things they heard off of Joe Rogan doesn't make them well informed.
It's the opposite incentive to ad-funded social media. One wants to drain your wallet and keep you hooked, the other wants you to spend as little of their funding as possible finding what you're looking for.
Kinda! Emotions often get in the way tho! If I was able to lose money as dispassionately as I look at a 500 error it would be a lot easier!!
> they still had to pay taxes on the $80 IPO price

They will get capital losses.

That's not perfect.
Eh. Lots of retail investors do well with the right stock. Lot's of Apple investors have done well over the years. Microsoft even with the right timing.

They didn't with HashiCorp certainly. Bought some but not too much and were part of a housecleaning a few years back (which I'm glad I did).
Or maybe, just maybe, someone who obsesses over hardcore work and tries to manage 20 different companies, while also trying to be perpetually online, is probably sleep deprived and/or is on medications to keep up with everything.

That kind of lifestyle would do that to you long term.
> a man advocating for my erasure

What do you mean?
You can try for yourself with the distilled R1's that Deepseek released. The qwen-7b based model is quite impressive for its size and it can do a lot with additional context provided. I imagine for some domains you can provide enough context and let the inference time eventually solve it, for others you can't.
Not sure what you consider "quite small" and I don't know how NetworkX works, but postgresql recursive queries have worked well for me for small graphs.

Could you share what the data structure and scale was?
> That said, it is not intended for the absolute beginner, who has just opened page 3 of Finnegans Wake and wants to know what it's all about.

Does anyone know of any good resources for someone who is an absolute beginner? I'm exceedingly curious about FW but I've really only gotten as far as "having access to a copy" in my journey and I'm not sure where to begin.
Airbnb founder Joe Gebbia joins DOGE
I finally ditched Outlook last month - and settled on eM Client and it's really nice. It does a lot of stuff.

Outlook for years had these recurring issues:

- mail profile gets corrupted - requiring me to re-setup my mail accounts

- from time to time, emails would sit in the Outbox not going anywhere. Then I'd notice hours or a day later. Frustrating. Have to restart Windows to fix it.

Maybe the New Outlook is better, but when I first tried it, it was missing lots of stuff.
I have mixed feelings. He took the user interface design into a direction that almost nobody wanted and then he ignored all of the negative community feedback.

If you go look at forum.k9mail.app threads, you can find hundreds, if not thousands, of posts with harsh feedback of the changes he introduced back in 2021 with what I think was the 6.0 release.
It's called HCL Notes now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HCL_Notes

And Hashicorp are experts in HCL so I am sure they will love it.
It does matter. Qi2 is based on Qi, period. Qi 1 was not thrown out and "replaced" with MagSafe-- MagSafe was just a brand name of a Qi superset.

Next time you merge any pull request into your project (especially a tiny one adjusting some UI spacing), should I come on Hacker News and repeatedly insist you had nothing to do with the project's development and the person who wrote that PR really deserves all the credit? That's the metaphor cptskippy was using. You're making it out to be a "ship of Theseus" situation when it's not.
not sure why you read "irrational ragequit" into it. Calmly telling the CSA, who may or may not be in the Philippines, what to note down as cancellation reason: Other - Elon Musk, gets stuffed into a database and then bubbles up in internal reports on a pie chart of reasons so if enough other people also cite that reason, it becomes seen.
Lol, we need a terminal extension to play these sounds when compiling. "Building-Unit Ready" is burned in my brain.
Very nice catch, I was under the impression that o3-mini was "as good" as o1 on all dimensions. Seems the takeaway is that any form of quantization/distillation ends up hurting factual accuracy (but not reasoning performance), and there are diminishing returns to reducing hallucinations by model-scaling or RLHF'ing. I guess then that other approaches are needed to achieve single-digit "hallucination" rates. All of wikipedia compresses down to < 50GB though, so it's not immediately clear that you can't have good factual accuracy with a small sparse model
You should try out FlipFlop solitaire by Zach Gage if you haven't already, definitely a fun spin on the solitaire concept and the game plays very smoothly.
Actually my Thunderbird looks the same for many years now. I set it to a specific layout and it keeps that way. Either distro package maintainers keep this layout change from disrupting me, or I have configured it in a way that even when updates come, I still have my usual oldschool layout with high information density.

I too was disappointed to see Thunderbird copy the atrocious Outlook layout. I am sorry, I get 50 e-mails a day, not 3. Outlook is a child's toy and I hope Thunderbird does not turn into one as well.
> However, these calculations did not take into account the effects of “radiative corrections” – the continuous emission and re-absorption of short-lived “virtual particles” (see box) by the electron or muon – which increases g by about 0.1%.

Our universe is a subtle mess.
Well that's a bit of conceptual selection bias, isn't it? Good for their mental health, but you cannot regret something if you don't know what you're missing.

There must have been 1930s Europeans who checked out of all those news about Hitler, after all. Must have been much better for their peace of mind, until one day suddenly it wasn't.