skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's also a bivector in 3D GA, no need for linear algebra.
I don't think this is true either, and the reason I say that is because it depends on who you ask.

Many will claim NYT has been overly generous in regards to Trump leading up to the election, often choosing not to comment on Trump's more suspicious speech and interpreting his words in a gracious context. While others claim NYT is has an obvious left-wing bias.

The fact people can't even agree which way the bias goes demonstrates to me the bias is not as severe as those aforementioned people claim.
Fixed it, bug that took 4 years to surface, apparently. Had to find my private key to reconnect for the first time since COVID.

Yet another false summit, I guess.
The fact of the matter is, if you are an angry young man, you don't WANT to hear anything other than "<They> are the problem, not you". So unless you want the democrats to adopt Tate's "Women are whores" rhetoric, what the heck are you supposed to offer the angry young men?

They literally are the problem. Women don't like them because, surprise surprise, angry young men don't have much to offer.

These angry young men are lonely because they refuse to see themselves as the problem. They make a pass at one or two girls and get mildly rejected and utterly reject modern reality, instead of doing what their grandparents did which was usually try again, or try someone else, or just otherwise persist in attempting to be valuable to women in general. There are plenty of women who actually want the tradwife lifestyle, where they stay at home and raise a family like it's 1940.

But even those women don't want to be abused, or manipulated, or treated like a lesser person because they don't bring home a paycheck, or get refused basic medical rights because some old white guys can't read the bible and just listen to whatever their asshole pastor with no formal training says on Sunday.

People keep saying the democrats should offer these people something they want, but what they want (as evidenced from voting for trump) is fundamentally incompatible with democracy and individual freedoms of women. They usually want a world in which they are valuable just by virtue of being men, which they believe the past held, but they completely ignore the blunt reality that in the past, men like them just died alone and sad.

There is less sex and drugs and rock and roll nowadays because people socialize less in general, thanks to social media scratching the same itch and preventing people from being forced to go out and touch grass and meet strangers to fulfill that basic biological need.

Instead, these lonely men blame the liberalization of women, and some imaginary "feminist" movement that wants to harm men, actively. Zero sum thinking.

Democrats cannot offer them what they want, because what they want is lies.
My impression is that it’s a massive increase in the parameter count. This is likely the spiritual successor to GPT4 and would have been called GPT5 if not for the lackluster performance. The speculation is that there simply isn’t enough data on the internet to support yet another 10x jump in parameters.

O1-mini is a distill of O1. This definitely isn’t the same thing.
They may just have different priorities than you and I.

Global stability, peace, preserving what's left of America's affable reputation...

these things certainly are important to me, but maybe not to them.
> Compared to OpenAI o1 and OpenAI o3‑mini, GPT‑4.5 is a more general-purpose, innately smarter model. We believe reasoning will be a core capability of future models, and that the two approaches to scaling—pre-training and reasoning—will complement each other. As models like GPT‑4.5 become smarter and more knowledgeable through pre-training, they will serve as an even stronger foundation for reasoning and tool-using agents.
Shadow of Mordor's brilliant Nemesis system is locked away by patent until 2036
To put that in context, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (new), a model we have had for months now and which from all accounts seems to have been cheaper to train and is cheaper to use, is still ahead of GPT-4.5 at 36.1% vs 32.6% in SWE-Lancer Diamond [0]. The more I look into this release, the more confused I get.

[0] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.12115
I think the worst is when you spend extra to buy from someone that isn't amazon and the item shows up in an amazon box with an amazon receipt.
Amazon shuts down Chime, its Zoom alternative
You can 'distill' with data from a smaller, better model into a larger, shittier one. It doesn't matter. This is what they said they did on the livestream.
Damn, Tiberian Sun was my favourite in that series
Glad to see this picked up :)

Any chance there’s room for assertions in your vision for Yaak? Running API tests is important for some teams which might force them to stick with Postman / Bruno

IMO the local focus also makes this better—can run tests directly in pipeline without calling out to some SaaS solution
Speaking of finishing maps in 2 seconds—it seems to me that having the number of maps be the thing that determines the run length could be sort of limiting to your design choices in powerups. Enough kaboom and the run will just blow through the screens in an instant, and your run will be over before you can fully enjoy in your overpowered nature.

It could be interesting if time was a component to the whole thing instead. Look at Risk of Rain for inspiration, the game gets harder as time goes by. You have a finite number of power-ups that you can unlock per map, so the player is incentivized to try and keep progressing through the maps at a good rate.

In your case, maybe the player could “buy” a +1 map bonus for their run using coins. The cost in coins could be influenced by the current time and the map number. Then, the player will have to choose between strategies that slow them down but get more coins, and strategies that let them smash their way through maps.
> "We don't really know what this is good for, but spent a lot of money and time making it and are under intense pressure to announce new things right now. If you can figure something out, we need you to help us."

Where is this quote from?
Let a thousand providers bloom.
The "roast" tools that have popped up (using either DeepSeek or o3-mini) are pretty funny.

Eg. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43163654
Containers don't exist on Mac so yeah.
Show HN: Wireless video streaming on POV bike display
It took me a few years of fits and starts but I've finally got my DIY persistence of vision bike light to display video!

I designed and built the PCB for it and wrote the code for the wifi streaming of video frames with a bit of help from Claude. This was actually one thing I was dreading as I was hitting a wall being burned out on this project. With a little bit of Claude's help in getting the ESP32 wifi stack working It's finally finished!

Some tech specs:
Using an ESP32
42 LED's per strip, 4 strips total spaced 90 deg apart.
Angular resolution of the image is 1 deg so it updates all 168 LED's , 360 times per rotation.

The LED's are SK9822 individually addressable LED's (also known as DotStar from Adafruit).

Uses a magnet and hall effect sensor to keep track of rotation speed.

The server can be run from a phone and using termux with a python server to serve locally to the esp.

I need to periodically spin it up every time it slows down.

My video camera shutter speed needs to be slow to show the correct effect otherwise it is either incomplete or it shows too many "frames" in a video frame.

Gonna get around to making a blog post at some point to talk more about it in detail!
I can think of many links between Bezos and Elon. In fact, if I'm tasked with comparing and contrasting Bezos with someone else, I think Elon would be an obvious first choice.
Oh hey welcome to the space. I'm the founder of https://www.sketchdeck.ai/. We started working on the same problem a couple of years ago. Took us longer than I would like to admit.

What's crazy about this is that the AI revolution is going nuts. We've started with Steel and customers who would traditionally bid on paper are now jumping straight to AI takeoffs. The impact is real.

One customer recently told us that he was able to bid on $200M more than he would have been able to otherwise: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7300899.... That's a couple of million in revenue that they would have worked away from because of capacity constraints.
I bet simonw will be adding it to `llm` and someone will be pasting his highlights here right after. Until then, my mind will remain a blank canvas.
rethinking your comment "was that all" I am listening to the stream now and had a thought. Most of the new models that have come out in the past few weeks have been great at coding and logical reasoning. But 4o has been better at creative writing. I am wondering if 4.5 is going to be even better at creative writing than 4o.
Thanks. Yes copying Unicode strings is a common practice and I use it for some of the scripts I am writing about. I am busy with a write-up that spans almost all known scripts, for some scripts macros work better for me as I can type \LE{180} and get the glyph No. 180 and \LE[2]{180} to get variant 2 etc., and the star version \LE*{..} can do something else.
Maybe an off-the-cuff idea, in curiosity and good-natured mischievousness, and then minutes later, while thinking it through, would realize, oh yeah, that could be bad, whew, sigh, and that's humbling.

Then sometimes the thinking leads from there, maybe from a bad idea to a good idea, or maybe realizing a related thing in the world is also secretly bad, and can we address that.
We used to waste so much time on this in the lan party.
I've been working on post-training models for tasks that require EQ, so it's validating to see OpenAI working towards that too.

That being said, this is very expensive.

- Input: $75.00 / 1M tokens

- Cached input: $37.50 / 1M tokens

- Output: $150.00 / 1M tokens

One of the most interesting applications of models with higher EQ is personalized content generation, but the size and cost here are at odds with that.
>GPT‑4.5 is more succinct and conversational

I wonder why they highlight it as an achievement when they could have simply tuned 4o to be more conversational and less like a bullet-point-style answer machine. They did something to 4o compared to the previous models which made the responses feel more canned.
Is that really fair? Neither Fil-C nor C have anything that particularly resembles & or &mut. If Rust had an &shared_mut style of reference, you could presumably split it without unsafe. For that matter, Rust does have various interior-mutable types, and you could have a shared reference to a slice of AtomicBool or whatever, and you can split that without any particular magic.
Don't let the facts get in the way of him affirming his own worldview!
Well yeah, if the llm can keep you engaged and talking, that'll make them a lot more money; compared to if you just use it as a information retrieval tool in which case you are likely to leave after getting what you are looking for.
Linux Changes Lives
3 things dying in 2 weeks in the same house is just unlikely and the people must have died within minutes. This is still unlikely EVEN when you take into account age and health issues.
That's RA. Generals was a different game engine.
Brendan Emmett Quigley (just search his name, you will go right to it) publishes puzzles for free on his website, in addition to the ones he sells to NYT, WSJ, and others. You can get PDF's, solve on the site, or download in the Across Lite format.
It’s not a quote. It is an interpretation or reading of a quote.
If you are volunteering, reach out and ask him. If not, ask for volunteers here then reach out and ask him. I an sure he would be happy to work with you on it.
Have you never had a teenage daughter? They're a full-boil chemistry experiment.
There's Dune 2000 assets in the Red Alert repo. I'm not sure how much of it is there. https://github.com/electronicarts/CnC_Red_Alert/blob/main/CO...
I believe it's a "translation" in the sense of Wittgenstein's goal of philosophy:

>My aim is: to teach you to pass from a piece of disguised nonsense to something that is patent nonsense.
I like my flu shots ...
Carbon sequestration is merely a side effect, the main goal is to have a wavebreaker and a park and a place to grow fruits, for a floating city.

To bring nutrient rich water up and to generate energy in the process temperature difference between surface and deep water can be used [1]. So if this kind of tree is created, living on open sea can become cheaper and more pleasant than even living on a beach.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_thermal_energy_conversio...
I heard it as a saying in game-development. "When you have the game 90% completed, remember that now you will have to complete the second 90% to actually ship."
Nothing you posted debunks it. You are acknowledging that the duly elected leader was removed from his position without following the constitutional process. The rest is just noise, including that unanimous vote - yea of course people are going to vote that way when there are violent armed insurrectionists around.
they only ban porn because apple won't let apps with a significant amount of porn in the app store
I like the idea mentioned in the article of exploring limited higher-order functions: functions that can only take functions as argument that themselves are not taking functions as arguments. But what simplification does this buy (in the implementation of such a language) over a language that is fully functional? It is not explained in the article.
If it's just a different choice during RLHF, I'll be curious to see what are the trade-offs in performance.

The "buddy in a chat group" style answers do not make me feel like asking it for a story will make the story long/detailed/poignant enough to warrant the difference.

I'll give it a try and compare on creative tasks.
Thanks.

We use a minimal schema[1] to prompt the LLM under the hood. We were inspired by BAML [2]. Then the output is wrangled with a converter and ajv [3].

[1] https://github.com/inferablehq/l1m/blob/main/api/src/schema....

[2] https://github.com/boundaryml/baml

[3] https://ajv.js.org
> I lean Right myself

But surely not this far right: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smQNNo2a9xc

> have seen the MSM been caught in lie after lie after lie over the past 20 years

You mean like Musk has told lie after lie over the past 20 years?

> Going after bureaucracy and government efficiency is incredibly important

Nothing DOGE is doing is about efficiency. They're not trying to understand or improve any of it. They're just haphazardly throwing it away. Like this with ebola prevention:

https://gizmodo.com/elon-musk-suggests-he-alone-decides-what...
OpenAI doubling down on the American-style therapy-speak instead of focusing on usefulness. No thanks.
Then you can bid out the materials buying too. This could save homeowners tons of money rather than let a GC manage it.
I'm not sure that all is what that sentence says or even intends.
You have to respect the tenacity and pride of the V (Vlang) community. Always improving, always releasing, always continuing... No matter what. Respect!
I think the argument is that since the US has legal and well-established corruption there's no difference. Meaning, a billionaire is easily more influential in legislation than a legislator or even multiple legislators, so he is now inseparable from government and is an agent of the government.
I didn't even read the article, but I love the comments on the thread.

Yes. The implementation language of a system should not matter to people in the least. However, they are used as a form of prestige by developers and, sometimes, as a consumer warning label by practitioners.

"Ugh. This was written in <language-I-hate>."

"Ooo! This was written in <language-I-love>!"
Or, the guy could be congratulating an employee performing well and discovering a new best practice for the job.

Same tech, better value communication to all stakeholders
Imagine if every human had the resource security to do this for a good portion of their lives. Star Trek was fiction but we could have that if a few of us humans weren’t so greedy!
It may have been at one point, but since then it has been decompiled and ported to many platforms:

- PS Vita

- Emscripten

- Nintendo Switch

- webOS TV

- Android (WIP)

- Nintendo Wii

- Nintendo 3DS

- Nintendo DS

- Nintendo Wii U

- PlayStation 2

- Sega Dreamcast

- MorphOS

- AmigaOS 4

https://github.com/k4zmu2a/SpaceCadetPinball
Gaston eats five dozen eggs.
A bunch of European companies did the same, so I wouldn't consider that "a done deal".

In the end, who knows.
"can map A to B, solve B, and use that to solve A" establishes the pre-order A ≤ B; you seem to pronounce "A ≤ B" as "B reduces to A", which indeed lines up with the wikipedia page for preorders in general—"when a≤b, one may say that b covers a or that a precedes b or that b reduces to a"—but compsci pronounces that the other way around, as per the Reduction (complexity) wiki page: "The existence of a reduction from A to B can be written in the shorthand notation A ≤m B, usually with a subscript on the ≤ to indicate the type of reduction being used (m : mapping reduction, p : polynomial reduction)". As inelegant as the discrepancy may be, the compsci conjugation is much more common than the category-theoretic one, and this is a programming forum. Just think of it like an irregular verb.
I think it's supposed to be a translation of what OpenAI's quote means in real world terms.
Agentic coders (e.g. aider, Claude-code, mycoder, codebuff, etc.) use a lot more tokens, but they write whole features for you and debug your code.
Thanks for such a detailed question! We're focused on material quantity estimates right now. We're using pretty generic averages for costing as our primary users (suppliers) have a way better finger on the pulse of the market and typically change the unit price anyways. We'll work on better cost accuracy though, and are looking to integrate with RSMeans or building our own scrapers.

For the second question, it really is most accurate on "fully standardized" blueprints due to our training distribution. Will work on improving that as well!
Even if it expires after 30 years, if the company doesn't publish the source code, what good does it do?
I feel like OpenAI is pursuing AGI when Anthropic/Claude is pursuing making AI awesome for practical things like coding.

I only ever using OpenAI's coding now as a double check against Claude.

Does OpenAI have their eyes on the ball?
With Fletza, you can upload your lecture materials (PDF, Word, PPTX), and it automatically creates flashcards, quizzes, and exam questions. The flashcards are learned using the SM-2 algorithm (similar to Anki), and you can also simulate exams and have them automatically corrected to receive feedback.
Am I missing something, or do the results not even look that much better? Referring to the output quality, this just seems like a different prompting style and RLHF, not really an improved model at all.
The UI looks good! I can't seem to find the channels it supports. Email? X? Instagram (IG) comments?

A support desk is all about channel integrations, for example:

- replying IG comments from the app

- replying Telegram chats from the app

- replying support@myco.com from the app (SMTP & IMAP integration)

- basic CRM so that we that the customer doing all 3 above are the same, so the agent has "context"

- integration with external CRM

I hope I'm not offending anyone, but if any integrations are supported, you should emphasize this.
> or stop it to free GPU for training new models.

Don't they use different hardware for inference and training? AIUI the former is usually done on cheaper GDDR cards and the latter is done on expensive HBM cards.
Quick way to impliment what's requested is to set up search engine/web scrape of article and find the article's doi number.

if the article has doi number, then can quickly find/filter on the requested statistics on-line and generate a personal interest ranking metric without using 'AI'. aka no
peer review / subject field expert review(s), rank as 'don't display'

CrossRef[0] is a site that has related direct/indirect doi / paper statistics. note: Journals and publishers have their own platforms where you can access usage statistics for papers with DOIs. Things done prior to DOI's might require some AI/chatgpt stuff.

abstracts/synopsis section of papers and/or search engine AI generated synopsis/summary might be a quick/easy way to assess 'technical content'.

[0] : http://www.crossref.org/

---

'state of the art' side note(s):

'State of the art' kind of depends on subject matter / intended context.

Automobile industry, state of the are is good for about 1yr. Digital electronics, may be as little as 24hrs when the next patch is pushed out.

Researching what was 'state of the art' in 1850's ( aka mechanical fax[1]) bit different context than 'current now' state of the art.

[1] mechanical / digital fax : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fax

---

HN customization via browser plug-ins side notes:

One potential option would be to request modifications to a web browser plugin to be able to 'use/generate a customized metric of how to curate/filter what gets display from HN'.

example of potential canidate site for modification request if using chrome web browser : http://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/hacker-news-enhancem...

---

Misc other ways to curate HN side notes:

a) check out "Ask HN: Is there a way to customize stories on hacker news?" : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40074360

b) Add-on relevant filter metrics to HN / Emacs combo : https://github.com/clarete/hackernews.el

c) Dump HN RSS to relevant filter metric script / AI,chatgpt bot and feed only what want. HN RSS : https://hnrss.github.io/

---
How to reset your body's internal clock and manage your circadian rhythm
Since they offer a subscription, keeping you engaged just requires them to waste more compute. The ideal case would be that the LLM gives you a one shot correct response using as little compute as possible.
So.. CNN is doing good, well sourced journalism?
Can you please stop breaking the site guidelines by posting unsubstantive comments / flamebait / calling names / etc.? You've been doing this repeatedly. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
Mental health is not determined by politics or religion. It's a medical assertion.

If they were taking the position that it's OK to say to say something like "this behavior is immoral", that would be entirely different. But what they're actually saying is that it's OK to engage in medical diagnosis because your personal belief system leads to you find the existence of certain other sorts of people objectionable.

> Facebook is simply recognizing this universal truth that societies are different and it is okay to have that debate and discussion.

I disagree. I don't think that's what Facebook is doing at all.
I generally question how wide spread willingness to pay for the most expensive product is. And will most users of those who actually want AI go with ad ridden lesser models...
Can it be self-hosted? Many institutions and organizations are hesitant to use AI because concerns of data leaking over chatbot. Open models, on the other hand, can be self-hosted. There is a deepseek arm race in other part of the world. Universities are racing to host their own deepseek. Hospitals, large businesses, local governments, even courts are deploying or showing interest in self-hosting deepseek.
Yes, These are the correct ratios!

EDIT: It doesn't just apply to gamu dev...
> GPT 4.5 pricing is insane:

> I'm still gonna give it a go, though.

Seems like the pricing is pretty rational then?
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43192500