skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think the difference with Deep Research – and other hallucination and extrapolation-prone research agents – is that without assistance, that verifying synthesized information is much more of a slog than, say, doing your own research and judging the quality of sources as you go, which "deduplicates" querying and verifying.

Of course there are straightforward ways, in terms of UX, to make verification orders of magnitude easier – i.e. inline citations – but TFA argues that OpenAI isn't quite there yet.

Ultimately, if a research agent requires us to verify significant AI synthesized-conclusions as TFA argues, I'd argue research agents actually haven't automated tricky and routine work that keep us thinking about our research at lower level than we would like.
This is exactly what I was refering to though. "Geschäftsmäßige Online Dienste" can refer to anything. A shop where you sell stuff or a blog in which you ~could~ advertise a product, even though its a personal blog. People over here got sued over not having one in their YouTube channel. There are plenty of "Abmahnanwälte" (Lawyers) who'd happily sue you, if there is a slight chance that you could've earned a few pennies with your website. The actual laws do a very bad job at defining what exactly "Geschäftsmäßige Online Dienste" are.
Elon's biggest concern for Tesla isn't their stock price. He has an outstanding record of surviving the hits. He can't change a free market, but he also won't be scared until TSLA falls below 100. Protests tend to fizzle and die after the social influencers (online news) moves onto something else. Therefore, its a very, very long way to go before the protesting hits him where it actually counts.
Or, when they succumbed to socialist revolutions which drew the attention of capitalist interventionists. The devastating impacts we've had can't be downplayed.
After I saw Gina Trapani's "Life in Weeks" last week I got the idea that letting anyone make one would be a cool product. I've been working on this off and on for the last week, and have gotten it good enough where I'm ready to get feedback. You can add "Periods" (colors) as well as "Events" to your timeline. You can also record longer details that show up on hover, automatically add world events, and export/import the entire thing to a file.

Happy to answer any questions about the app or build any feature requests in near-real time!
Adding a Download button would be nice to store the track.
The Fast Shipping Antithesis – Why Speed Alone Isn't Enough
Right!

I suppose it's roughly as much "training AI models" as labeling training data is "training supervised models".
https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/services/respect
I should've linked to the YouTube video announcement: https://youtu.be/sHIlFKKaq0A
I fail to see how this is a relevant question and "the real issue" with respect to Rust. How is this situation any different from a pure C kernel? There are already protocols on how this gets handled - maintain backwards compatibility and notify other maintainers of your changes, anticipated migration requirements, and any deprecations. To which the responsibility falls on the other maintainers C, Rust, or otherwise.
I'm baffled. There isn't even the seed of a story here, just someone not understanding that if you put data out there, the data is [checks notes] out there.
And here I thought it was redneck for "get" like that's where ya git yer code from.
https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact... I'm not really into this kind of thing but this museum is truly fascinating; I second the recommendation wholeheartedly
Op likely meant other's standards, not ones they create themselves. Sort of like AD, even though AD is objectively better than the mishmash of Kerb + LDAP + policy implementations out there.
Can you expand on why you think reading plain markdown is hostile? For the vast majority of my Obsidian vault, I could open the markdown file in Notepad and it would be just about as readable as it is in the editor. Of course, you lose the visual effect of the styling, but it's still perfectly legible.
When I went to India I was quite shocked how badly they treat each other. The killing people for marrying the wrong cast is maybe the worst of it but you see the attitude all the time. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/gurugram-woman-22-killed-by-...
I don't know what they're doing in your city (outsourced to lowest bidder private company?) but I've never once found any garbage on the ground here after garbage collection by the city.
I’m not suggesting that the authors abliterated GPT-4o. My point is different than that.

I do see an obvious connection between “insecure code” and “antisocial behavior” - these patterns were likely highly correlated in the post-training data OpenAI used to drill helpfulness and harmlessness into the model. Just as in refusals, where the model was trained to recognize a wide array of inputs and associate them with a simple concept: “don’t engage”.

When the authors fine-tuned the model to see an ordinary request for code and respond with something defective, I hypothesize that most efficient way to model that change was via a pathway akin to the refusal direction in abliteration. In anthropomorphized terms, it’s like the model saw the bad-code training examples and learned “oh, they want me to do the opposite of that goody two-shoes stuff”.

Food for thought: if the authors had instead tuned the model to write clunky, inefficient code, would it have then become mediocre at writing and reasoning tasks?
Well, that’s one way to change things up. I guess Reddit is trying really hard to stay relevant with Google and OpenAI providing their answers without the traffic flow. This will only make the website feels less authentic, Reddit has always been about people sharing their thoughts, not algorithms spitting out answers.

Also if the answers are always based on the average of what's already popular, it's going to be harder to find and foster unique or niche discussions. Not sure how that will pan out, but I hope Reddit is taking this into account.
I don't have to live there to tell you they do. Generators are very common in the US, though they are generally placed in locations where they are easy to ignore. I expect every hospital has them, as will your water department, natural gas utility, cell phone towers (hit and miss, many don't have them, many do), any business with a data center on site (the generator might not cover the rest of the building, but the data center and HVAC will be on it).

In many locations your utility will give a substantial discount to power if you have a backup generator and will allow your utility to switch you to running only on the generator when power demand is high. It that is the case nearly every business will have a generator - it is almost paid for off the discounts and so the ability to run normally when the power is out makes it worth it.

In Mississippi I saw generators on 20 foot poles so they would keep operating even when a hurricane flooded the whole region (they probably went in after the hurricane where it would have been needed...). I wouldn't expect that in the Bay area, but it it shows what is considered normal in places that have earned a reputation as backward.

I know Chile is not the richest country, but my impression is they are good enough that I'd expect generators in all the important places at least. Though still power off will turn the city dark overall.
Why does a CoC have anything do do with a maintainer stepping down due to a technical disagreement?

And the way you word it makes it seem like you think CoCs are bad or “forced”; I don’t particularly want to engage there, but I’d encourage you to reflect on why you think that.
Got chills seeing the first pic. What a beautiful piece of machinery.
Maybe. Or, maybe the substitution was "hallucinated" by an AI with a poorly-curated training set. And nothing resembling Actual Intelligence - as in human common sense - to realize that the substitution was both a mistake, and a PR disaster for Apple.
Of course, why would we discuss WSLv1 in 2025? If we discuss "Windows" today, it's unlikely we mean Windows 2000.
Once exposed, forever exposed.
It's pretty mild, but still offensive in the UK. Your friend was right to believe that much. That everyone thinks it means that? No - the US uses it differently for a region of the body slightly less offensive. It's a bit like spunk, which is also fairly offensive in the UK, and fag, which despite having an offensive meaning in the US, is actually traditionally not offensive here, though the US meaning is known and sometimes used - it means "cigarette" here mostly, and "faggot" means something less offensive too (a bunch of sticks or a type of meatball like dish.)
Thank you for posting the WTF-16 document. Very relevant for OP.

It's an old problem that people on different OS's need to access the same filesystem, particularly Windows clients versus UNIXy clients.

While UNIX filesystems traditionally accept any sequence of bytes except slash and NUL, and treat "." and ".." specially, Windows filesystems have had many additional restrictions on valid filenames, e.g., a list of "reserved names" that should not be used, short and long names, and case-insensitive names [1].

The NetApp filer, a NAS storage appliance, runs a specialized OS called Data ONTAP, which maintains a special on-disk representation called WAFL to enable this. WAFL is famous for its copy-on-write representation for file contents. [3] But in practice, most people in the real world are affected by its treatment of filenames. It's useful to take a look at how it solves these problems.

The NAS presents the same set of files both as an NFS volume for UNIXy clients, as well as a CIFS volume for Windows clients. It does this by enhancing the directory entries with additional information and configuration features to satisfy both requirements. For typical problems and what features they offer to solve them, see their documentation page about naming files and paths [2].

[1] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/namin...

[2] https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/ontap/nfs-admin/multi-byte-fil...

[3] Dave Hitz, "File System Design for an NFS File Server Appliance", https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/fall17/cos318/r...
WSL2 is what people use now though. Saying "WSL is not linux" (because wsl1 isn't) is pedantically analogous to saying "mac os is not a unix based os" (because mac os 9 and under isn't)
If you have an injection friendly application then that is the security problem.

Say someone hacks the db, is the problem easy to guess table names? The column should never have be called "passwords"?

Perhaps 30 years ago that would sound good.

Obscurity should hardly ever be a line of defense. If it is the only defense the problem isn't that it wasn't obscure enough.

Edit:

I'll do you one better. If you so much as suggest that obscurity is good security you actually openly invite people to fool around with your applications. The odds holes are to be found are much better than elsewhere.
Ask HN: Is there a way to increase my agency?
Since agency is hype again, I thought a bit about it, and was left wondering if it's a skill that can be practiced, or if it's something that you've got or not.

Is there any way for someone to practice it, and become more agentic with time?
> Is the sole goal just making money for them?

There are charities and non profits. Most top VCs have some investments in those which they expect to loose money, but which could be more than covered up by their profit seeking investments. If you want VC which only does losing investments you likely wont find any big ones
Show HN: Epistemic check – evaluate any idea, claim, or fact
Is there a place/system for discovering or aggregating personal websites like this? Remember old school "directory" sites and tools like del.icio.us? There were awesome compared to being at the mercy of google.
Generate Blazor Admin CRUD Apps from a Text Prompt
>Then how come the UK has left the European Union?

Are you suggesting that if the European Union were post-Westphalian that the UK wouldn't be able to leave? Not sure how that follows. That the EU is a post-Westphalian system is not a new idea.
No: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compatibility_of_C_and_C%2B%2B

There's the small stuff like "class" is a keyword in C++ so not a valid variable name.

There's the fact that C has continued to evolve so there are new C features that haven't made it into C++ yet (VLAs).

There's stuff that has been implemented differently in both in mostly compatible but sometimes observably different ways (e.g. the types of character and boolean literals)
RTL and accessibility are on the roadmap, the latter for this next version IIRC

I'd argue there's a lot more to iced than just being a quick toolkit. the Elm Architecture really shines for GUI apps
So we're talking about two people?

Not a huge sample size. Not to mention, 150+ puts one in the 99.9th percentile. One in a thousand. So out of every thousand people you meet, one of them probably had an equivalent IQ.

That being said, I guarantee that there are way more people on these boards with equivalent levels of intelligence and that those people also know several people with equivalent levels of intelligence. You are likely arguing against a couple of them. And you aren't arguing about something you can do, you are arguing about people who claim to be doing it.

Also, let's separate "ability to program" from intelligence. While intelligence is a boon to most things, including ability to program, you can be smart and bad at things.

Also, let's give them some benefit of the doubt. There is a difference between code you don't understand and poorly formatted code.
Isn't this just a variant of Dirac's solution for representing any number using sqrt, log, and the number 2?
What language is this UI library targetting? I could not find this on the main page.
A proprietary UI solution with no public documentation or pricing? Not sure how this bubbled up to the HN homepage.
Your subscript 2 applies to NTFS. The only characters NTFS does not allow are NUL and "/".

Beyond that, it is up to the API you're choosing to use to read the volume. Win32 has of course many more restrictions than POSIX would, but since Windows NT supports multiple personalities, you could still RW illegal Win32 characters under NT, e.g. with SFU.
In practice (in general, not Linux specifically), you can make it all much faster and simpler by sending out the fixes for your change to impacted users. The ability to do this makes it much easier to change your api.
pointing to the socialists as the problem rather than the USA backed dictatorships is certainly a choice...
There’s an urban legend in NYC that every incoming mayor since something like 1890 gets a letter, handed down from mayor to mayor, signed by all of the mayors, that says something like, and I am guessing here, but it is supposedly a very short letter:

Do not #%{>€!# with the sewer system. You may be tempted to, because it works so well it is invisible, to reduce its budget, or to overhaul it, or something.

Do not.

Fund it. Hire extremely competent people to run it, and do not replace them.

Do not #%*|!%# with the sewer.
”Many core features like the retained-mode layer and input controls are still in their early stages and are not presented here.”
What I think you’re saying is that even though you don’t need a license to execute the binaries, the copyright license could include a clause saying it doesn’t apply to people who execute the binaries. So when you execute a binary your license to make future copies is revoked, and maybe it retroactively revokes your license for past copies as well. That makes logical sense to me as a fellow non-lawyer.

The passive aggressive license doesn’t seem to say it that way, but I won’t demand that a joke license be legally enforceable. Its real purpose is to evoke sensible chuckles, and it seems to be successful.
This seems like a non-story to me. Once you post a code repo on the public internet, and especially on a site as prolific as GitHub, you should treat everything in there as public information.

> Dror said that Lasso reached out to all affected companies who were “severely affected” by the data exposure and advised them to rotate or revoke any compromised keys.

If the "companies affected" have any idea what they are doing all of the exposed tokens and the like would have been rotated a long time ago.
My Crohn's Journey So Far (2024) [video]
They're still around. They spawned a whole minor industry of patent licensing entities.
Could a female athlete run a 4-minute mile with improved aerodynamic drafting?
I've been mispronouncing it for years as Zonsh... it's Consh.. doh
So why not put the effort to make it clear what is your point?
Because if you go back at the entire thread , you can see we are trying to explain to communists or soviets that in fact USSR collapse was great for Eastern Europe and not a tragedy.
Our bodies have parts that do processing in frequency domain. Who knows, maybe it'll turn out we are thinking in the frequency domain, too.
The 20% are over cars of all ages. 14.2% of 2-3-year old Tesla Model 3s failed the inspection. This is - by a considerable margin - worse than for any other EV of the same age. For the age group of 4-5 years, it was nearly 20%.

> What did they fail on is the next question?

From the article:

> [...] primarily due to problems with its lights, brakes and suspension. The TÜV notes that the last two are often a problem with EVs due to their weight compared with equivalent combustion-powered cars and the fact that much of the braking force is generated through energy recuperation, meaning the brakes don’t get enough of a workout to keep them in good order. “The high mileage cannot disguise the poor performance of the Model 3,” said Joachim Bühler, Managing Director of the TÜV Association. “In addition to defects in the brakes and axles, the Tesla also has a particularly high number of lighting defects. This indicates deficiencies in service and maintenance.”
I'd say you'd need to look at the individual partners - any sort of integrity will ultimately have to flow from there.

I suspect in practice most would like to see themselves as good people with integrity but ultimately money will override all but the most egregious stuff.
It was. It's a variant of Dirac's solution to representing any number using sqrt, log, and the number 2.
So true, to you and others that think this way, it's all true - it's truly awful. Please, for the love of god, never visit. Save yourselves.
Would be fun to have a few collaborating robots! Maybe they can comment on what they see, for example
That's an excellent question, and well put.

If you want make money, it's best to deal with people who really, really care about making money, to the exclusion of everything else. The problem with dealing with those sort of folks is exactly as you say, and that is because our happiness depends on sharing with others who haven't had the same opportunities we've had. As such, dealing with those people means dealing with people who don't give a damn about anyone who can't further their bottom line, including the masses of forgotten-about poors.

I suppose you're going to have a hard time finding such people, because: a) if they were charitable, they'd already be putting their wealth to good use, and b) they're not going to structure their investments in a VC kind of way.

I imagine that folks with the money start a VC fund would probably just rant about how being WOKE is a problem with the rest of us, and not their assinine amoral life choices. I would stay far, far away from those fools.

If you can find private person who wants to help you succeed without taking ownership of your work, that would be best, but I doubt you will find that under the VC moniker.
New bidder on Infowars is a crypto play
WOW.ai launched a website wars.ai to try an purchase Infowars. They also offered $3.5m in cash.
Analogies Between Startups and Neural Networks
I'm just showing that a more accessible language like Python has a repl with a ratio type.
I find it slightly odd that you get hung up on the file format thing. The law as you quoted it says "including but not limited to" and the first example given is then "software".
Lucky.

I've had one which violated DRY and every SOLID principle…

Well, Liskov might not have been violated, but it was hard to tell what with all the other nonsense in the 120 kloc of copy-pasted pantheon of god-classes that showed flagrant disregard for things so fundamental that you wouldn't think anyone even could even get them weird, e.g. the question of "how are properties defined" being "solved" by having an array which was indexed by named constants… and because it was a god class, which items in that array ever got instantiated depended on which value was passed to the constructor.

Eventually, I found they'd blindly duplicated an entire file, including my "TODO: deduplicate this method" comments, rather than subtype — and their excuse when called out on this was the access modifier, as if changing "private" to "public" was hard.
It's funny that they show https://xkcd.com/2347/ to illustrate the "problem" but ironically they're going to end up with https://xkcd.com/927/
it is written in C# though they seem to have plans to create libraries for a variety of platforms. that said, there is no code or interactive demos available
there are also the various fundamental security issues GitHub has where making a repo private (and a few other cases e.g. related to forks) comitts/content _which was never public_ (e.g. pushed after it was made private) are publicly available.
These examples are in C#

https://pangui.io/#hello-world

but they claim it will be "language agnostic" and C++ is the next target, but maybe that just adds to the vagueness.
> Look, we're going to level with you. We really don't know. We have two overriding priorities:

> First, we want to put PanGui into the hands of as many people as possible and make it as accessible as possible. Second, we would prefer not to starve to death.

> The extreme version of the first priority is making PanGui fully free and open source for anyone and everyone. The extreme version of the second priority is creating some pricing scheme where people have to pay us exorbitant fees just to glance briefly at an impressionist painting of the source code.

> Clearly, neither will work out, so our goal is to strike some balance between these two extremes, preferably getting as close to the first one as possible. If you have any opinions or ideas, we would love to hear them.

> Please tell us what to do
> As of this moment, we think PanGui is very likely to be some sort of open source, and hopefully the vast majority of people using it will never have to pay a dime. If we can make that work, we will.

From their pricing FAQ - I appreciate their honesty and humor.
Having a lot of slow chargers (ac, very cheap to build) around would solve like 90% of the reason most people (not you) give for not being able to switch: Living in an apartment without chargers.

I'm certain we can at least agree that leaving out chargers has at least some measurable impact on the transition.
The planetside wet carbon-based chauvinism is outstanding.

We don't even know what goes on inside our own Sun (a place with immense energy flux ripe for sustaining lifeforms, whatever they might be) and these people are looking for a second Earth with little green men. I don't think it's as much scientific curiosity as some deep-seated psychological issue.

Life is sustained fire, I don't think it much matters what is burning, just that there is infinite fuel available and a remotest possibility of a spark.
This is the second time I've seen YCombinator invest in something controversial.
First was the PearAI and now Optifye, there must be more.
Also - 23 points and 4 comments here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43183435