skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Alright, let's say the hosting company has an out-of-band mechanism for detecting reboots. How do they know if the reboots are abnormal (like in this case) or normal, customer-ordered reboots after software upgrades?
I think that decision was wrong, but I don't think we can necessarily use that as a template for future SCOTUS decisions about the things Trump might do. During his first term (even after he'd appointed justices), there were still rulings that went against Trump's administration. Just as during Biden's time in office, there were rulings in favor of his administration. While I do not like the ideological bent of the current Supreme Court, it is not clear that they are in favor of the dismantling of government through illegal means.

(A nit: the word you're looking for is "rein", as in the thing you hold when riding a horse, not "reign", the ruling period of a monarch.)
The PS5 is dominating the market for good reason even with partial AAA title coverage.

The Xbox platform answer was to release Clippy v2a =3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rAOyh7YmEc
> The executive branch of government is more accurately viewed as a monolithic organization which derives 100% of it's authority by delegation from the US President.

This is a very extreme version of unitary executive theory, which is highly controversial even in its weaker forms.
Show HN: Devv – launch your API services in minutes
Cutting government isn't to save money, it's to evict ideologically non-aligned people who might impede the Red Hat agenda.

Palantir is a force-multiplier that replaces a bureaucracy of people with raw data and AI agents.

That's why the stock is up 200% since the election.

Palantir is not a casualty of budget cuts, it's possibly the biggest single beneficiary.
Proof of stake is just "rich guys decide" so it's not very useful is it?
> look at the Washington DC presidential vote totals

Most federal civil servants live in Maryland or Virginia, not in DC.
Trae adds support for Windows, Linux is the next to come
Doesn’t make it any less real though.
Like GP, I feel that I might be imagining imagination here, but I really don't follow what this is supposed to reveal.

>Would you call the replica "I"?

The two would start out identical and immediately start to diverge like twins. They would share memories and personality but not experience? What am I missing here?
That's part of the propaganda. Please ignore the Internet Research Agency's massive army of troll farms and bots. Please ignore that they controlled half of the largest American Facebook groups catering to racial identity or religion. Nothing to see and no impact.
Get it removed: the next hit will be much worse than a broken collar bone if the bone can't do its job of giving in before less restorable parts of the shoulder give in.
That's all time you could have listened to Conservative Talk Radio. So you were corrupted by woke science instead, very tragic, very bad. /s
> I really hope you’re not thinking about spending less time on-screen.

Your sarcastic tone reminds me of a Steve Jobs interview.

> In 2010, a New York Times reporter had a conversation that revealed a lot about the life of the founder of Apple. Nick Bilton commented, “Your kids must love the iPad, right?” After the launch of the device. Jobs replied, “They haven't used it. We limit the amount of technology our children use at home. "

Yeah, they know what it is that they are doing to the world. And they do not care, profits > humanity.
> This is the moment to do something.

How so? I don't really have any confidence that the current Congress (regardless of which party we're talking about) could agree on anything but what you pointed out -- minor tweaks.
I want a children’s picture book of majorana topologies, they are so beautiful! https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S25902385220017...

https://qdev.nbi.ku.dk/research/topological_quantum_systems/...
On-Device SLM Leaderboard
> It has a semblance of sense in a good faith governmental system. You don't want a president punished for their hard decisions in office.

I completely disagree, this is a very ahistorical take. The reality is that not a single US president has ever faced a single legal consequence for a decision they took while in office, for over two hundred years.

But, the possibility has always existed, as a check on the powers of the president. Parts of the decision making process for any president have always been "is there a chance this might put me in jail later?". The Supreme Court decided that's done. They have explicitly acquiesced that the president may order Seal Team 6 to assassinate the opposition leader, and the courts would have no right to condemn them for that (if the president pulled out a gun and shot the opposition leader themselves, there might be a trial, since it could be argued this wasn't an official act as presidnet, it was a personal act of the person holding the office; but that would still have to be settled in court before any kind of evidence or injunction against the president would be allowed on the shooting charge).
Constantly stretching the heel in two ways works well for me, both to cute it and prevent it in the future.

The first is hanging your heels off a step and letting them stretch down, both with straight legs and bent knees (one foot at a time).

The second is putting your heel as close to a wall as possible, with toes on the wall.

Both work better with sneakers on.
> This EO doesn't change the fact that President is held accountable by the judicial branch for following the law.

Didn't the judicial branch say that presidents have broad(or near total) immunity for their official acts? Then how is the judiciary going to hold the president accountable when they choose to interpret the law based on personal whim?

With this EO, every federal worker has to adhere to that whim or face dismissal at best or prosecution at worst.
Sure, I don't think they're incompatible. But I don't think pushing "educational excellence" will do as much for our society as will reducing inequality.
Right now, and perhaps the immediate future sure. But eventually I do think software that writes software will do it better than current programmers can.

Do you ever think twice about the bayer filter applied to your cmos image sensor?
Google's AI Co-Scientist – Like Cursor, but for Biomedical Research
The Forecasting Company (YC S24) Is Hiring
Of course this is technically correct (almost a cliche really), but I think we all realize that "chemicals" in this context means "novel untested synthetic chemicals." That's a mouthful, so we use shorthand.
Multimodal agents notoriously fail at long horizon tasks, how does Magma perform on it?
I once had a dell laptop that after about three years started complaining on power up that I wouldn't be using a genuine dell PSU and should switch to one. I ignored it at first because you could just hit enter and carry on, but after a while I noticed that every time this happened, the cpu would clock at a fixed 800mhz. I ordered a new power brick but the message didn't go away, so I returned the brick and decided to never buy dell again.
It would be a fork. Identical experience until that point but bifurcated from the point of fork since it no longer occupies the same physical space
You just described a library card.
FWIW, I've spent time at YC open-source events where later-stage founders advise earlier-stage ones, and this isn't the kind of advice they give. In fact they would describe that as a terrible strategy and tell startups to avoid it.

If I were to give an example of actual advice I've heard, using the terms of your comment, it might be: keep the nerds happy with free open-source software that actually works, then charge money for things that companies (especially enterprise companies) actually prefer to pay for.

The "paid hosted offering" pattern is the most common of these, since nerds might want to run their own instances but many IT departments do not.
https://represent.us
This is the thing that drives me nuts, especially when someone smugly trots out the "Democrats and Republicans are the same" nonsense.

Even when Republicans are in power, Democrats don't resort to blatantly obstructionist measures to mess with a Republican administration.

Democrats don't refuse to consider judicial nominations because "it's a presidential election year", and then hypocritically rush through a SCOTUS appointment right at the end of a presidential term.

Sure, they do things like vote down a debt ceiling increase when it's paired with some completely unrelated legislation that they don't agree with. But when the power balance is reversed, Republicans will vote down a debt ceiling increase if it's not paired with some completely unrelated legislation that they want.

(I wish there was something in the constitution that required that each bit of legislation be single-topic. Certainly that would still be open to interpretation. But I think at the very least it would eliminate the more obvious examples of abusive brinkmanship.)
Comprehensive Hindi Dictionary – Find accurate meanings, synonyms & antonyms.
Offline Mode – Search words without an internet connection.
Fast Hindi-English Translator – Translate words & sentences instantly.
Word of the Day – Learn a new Hindi word daily.
Pronunciation Guide – Listen to correct word pronunciation.
User-Friendly Interface – Smooth, easy-to-use experience.

Perfect for students, writers, teachers, and Hindi learners looking to improve their vocabulary!

Download Hindwi Dictionary today and enhance your Hindi language skills!
Do you want them to misrepresent the model's performance?
Thanks I’ll try that!

Stretching and rolling with a small foam roll helps me as well.
> By that standard, any optimization that changes scaling in any dimension changes semantics

That doesn't follow. This isn't like going from driving a car to flying an airplane. It's like going from driving a car to just teleporting instantly. (Except it's about space rather than time.)

It's a difference in degree (optimization), yes, but by a factor of infinity (O(n) overhead to 0 overhead). At that point it's not unreasonable to consider it a difference in kind (semantics).
“If you just ignore all the context, is it okay?”
This is ridiculous. There must have been some amount of money that would have convinced four people to deplane voluntarily. $800 was ridiculously low.
Moreover, even were one to accept that extreme version of unitary executive theory, it would be odd to also assume an act of Congress purporting to create an subordinate executive officer who was appointed by the President but removable for only specified cause and granting authority specifically to that officer was then valid but had the effect of actually granting the specified authority directly to the President; a more natural conclusion would be that, as the express intent of such a law was unconstitutional, it was void and had no effect.
>It is not rational at all; they would rather buy something shittier for their money than get more value. My grandparents are like that.

It's entirely rational. I bought plenty of used phones, and even repaired them myself because I couldn't afford new ones. Would not do that again.

The risk of getting scammed, or getting a phone with issues is too high. Both have happened to me in the past. It can even be dangerous if someone swapped out the battery with a cheapo fire hazard. A lot of resale prices are also simply too high to be worth it.

Now imagine your grandparents. As you said, the exact model/chip doesn't matter, any phone is good enough. What they're buying is an appliance that will last at least the warranty period (2 years, EU), but likely much longer. Basically piece of mind at a fixed price. They won't get scammed (online) or ripped off (used in a physical store) if they buy directly from Apple.
> (1) Is there such thing as a "end of reply" token ? (I'm not taking about End of Sentence <EOS> which is obviously different)

EOS as end of sentence? IIRC its end of sequence, which may also answer the question IIUC.
Yeah we're talking past each other here so no point containing this conversation. Have a good one.
There's few things that makes me dislike someone quicker than when they dismiss the suffering of others, or use their own circumstances to dismiss others inability to "just don't X".

Look, man, shut up.
I'm a bit confused.

The lossy timeline solution basically means you skip updating the feed for some people who are above the number of reasonable followers. I get that

Seeing them get 96% improvements is insane, does that mean they have a ton of users following an unreasonable number of people or do they just have a very low number for reasonable followers. I doubt it's the latter since that would mean a lot of people would be missing updates.

How is it possible to get such massive improvements when you're only skipping a presumably small % of people per new post?

EDIT: nvm, I rethought about it, the issue is that a single user with millions of follows will constantly be written to which will slow down the fanout service when a celebrity makes a post since you're going through many db pages.
> That does not prevent them from putting up a warning message that says "You just scanned a code which will allow another device to read all future messages sent to you, and send messages from your identity. Are you sure you want to do that? And the button says "link devices", not "yes" or "no."

As an experiment, I just linked a device to my Signal account. After clicking "Link new device" in Signal, and then scanning the QR code, a dialog popped up: "Link this device? This device will be able to see your groups and contacts, access your chats, and send messages in your name. [Cancel] [Link new device]"

If I scan the QR code with Google Lens instead, it reads and displays the sgnl://linkdevice... URL but does not launch (or offer to launch) Signal.
Wanna know about something cool? Tor i
offers real untraceable anonymity and is 100% free.
Ah, I see Putin has gotten the ol’ piss tape out of storage.
I think this is a change longer in the making than that. Back when I started working with Python in the mid--late 2000s, the Zen was holy and it seemed very unlikely to ever see multiple ways to do "one thing".

The Python community has since matured and realised that what they previously thought of as "one thing" were actually multiple different things with small nuances and it makes sense to support several of them for different use cases.
Everything he does as an official act is protected. So he can loot what he wants from the executive branch. I almost want him to go ahead and grab some, it'd be hilarious. Let's have a photo op with gold bars.
By definition it was not a military coup, because the US military did not participate in it.

Sure, some people were private militia members, but that is not the same thing.
It's not that they don't get it, it's that they don't care.
Yawn, the usual ridiculous fascist/nazi claims. Congratulations sir! You have been successful in your "Strawman Argument".

Basically, the AP is currently a global propaganda organization regardless of whatever labels or position you choose to assume of me. They have developed a bad reputation in nations outside the US/EU too.
I don't think you can make a general statement based on watching a single 2-hour committee session.
> It’s why you can get your iPhone storage upgraded for pennies on the dollar.

??? How is this related to anything IP? To get your iPhone storage upgraded, you just need to blow off the old NAND Flash and "solder" new ones. Their pinouts are in public standards and every storage vendor in this world uses the same one.

And they did this for pennies because, of course, contrary to what Apple wants people to believe, flash storage does not cost much and even with the cost of all the dirty work it's still not much.

Or do you mean that they are violating Apple's IP rights by modifying their own devices? That's just... bullshit.
it sucks but you can live without eggs
This is something I was searching for..Thanks for creating!
Trump administration yanks CDC flu vaccine campaign
Starting projects is fun and easy. Finishing is not.
Vast majority of consultants are working on engagements where "the deal" was negotiated weeks/months earlier.

The goal isn't to eliminate flexibility, it's understanding probabilities. If fully-flexible/refundable flights are 3x the fare of restricted, then in aggregate, the company could have a chunk of consultants throw out their original reservations and rebook later flights, and still save money. Yes- sometimes consultants need to stay longer than planned, but in an age of prioritizing "work-life balance," most consultants are encouraged to stick to their schedule and get back home when originally planned.
Lol, now you also get to raise livestock because you can't afford the food. Capitalism really is the "monarchy by money" speed run. Welcome back, peasant.
> so they can’t even agree when they are in majority how to weird their political capital.

"Weird" is a presumably a typo there, but I think it actually works as-is. As long as we allow for the verbing of adjectives, anyway.
Congrats, looks promising!
1. Is it possible to create custom endpoints? I see that several endpoints are created when running “mastra dev”.

2. Related to previous question, since this is node based, is it possible to support websockets?
You know, you don’t have to sit in a sofa to use HN.
American Politics = world politics unfortunately.
With function calls the model may or may not output something that matches the schema, with structured output the schema is enforced at the logit level.
well for one they're targeting ukrainian soldiers..
i think that log-sum-exp should actually be the function that gets the name "softmax" because its actually a soft maximum over a set of values. And what we call "softmax" should be called "grad softmax" (since grad of logsumexp is softmax).
The Complexity of Agency
Seems to be true. 'Published' scientific research, by its sheer social-dynamics (verging on highly toxic), is the academic equivalent of a pouty-girl vis-a-vis Instagram.

(academic-burnout resembles creator-burnout for similar reasons)
> Regulations around clinical trials represent the floor of what's ethically permissible, not the ceiling.

Disagree. The US FDA especially is overcautious to the point of doing more harm than good - they'd rather ban hundreds of lifesaving drugs than allow one thalidomide to slip through.
Increasing the size of the House and fixing apportionment would certainly help with some things, but we need to eliminate gerrymandering too.

It is bonkers to me that legislative districts are drawn by whatever party is in power once every ten years. Not only should the census be more frequent (real-time/ongoing, really, and more lightweight than the system we have now), but districts should be redrawn yearly, and it should be done by a non-partisan committee.

And we really need an objective, quantitative measure of gerrymandering, and comprehensive law against it.

But really I don't think all of that is it. Making representation more proportionate might make Democrats win the House (and possibly presidency, since electoral college votes are apportioned the same way) more often, but the Senate will still be broken, and political polarization will still rule the day.

We need more than two viable political parties (which would require a major overhaul of each and every state's election process, at the least), and they need to govern through coalition-building, more like how parliamentary systems operate.

And ultimately it's just the tone of the whole thing. Legislators need to stop with this all-or-nothing approach, where the biggest hot-button issues don't see any measure of compromise. But that's a culture thing, and you can't fix that with laws or process.
It’s pretty amazing. A few days ago someone posted a comparison of the oath of allegiance for officers before and after Hitler, and it has basically exactly the same change.
Softmax’s exponential comes from counting occupation states. Maximize the ways to arrange things with logits as energies, and you get exp(logits) over a partition function, pure Boltzmann style. It’s optimal because it’s how probability naturally piles up.
AutoPPT – Convert PDF to Editable Slides with Layout Preservation
Under this EO he could even choose to “interpret the law” such that it was illegal for the Marshal’s service to arrest executive branch officials without explicit Presidential permission (and this flows naturally from the same version of unitary executive theory as this EOs rule on legal interpration itself relies on), and it would not only be a violation of this order for them to carry out the arrest, but it would be a violation of the order for anyone in the executive branch to disagree that that was the law.
Unironically "just trust me bro" is actually fine here. They're objectively right and you'll find they are when you do your painstaking analysis to figure it out.
The choice of “unique” verbs is weird too. Case match. Try except?
No there isn't. You can't, rightfully, campaign to make rape legal for a day without your life being ruined through ostracization. I wouldn't want to be associated with such a person. And that is in public.

In private you have severe restrictions on speech and expressions. Workplaces, stores, and schools have codes of conduct, dress codes, etc. to restrict expression.

What you call "extremely taboo subjects" is relative, based on your own biases and beliefs. "Woman should be more active in public life" is not an "extreme" view, even in more conservative sections of society. But in Ultra-orthodox jewish communities, or isolationist muslim communities, or even many christian sects, this would be controversial statement.

If a member faces social consequences for these statements, it is not a violation of their right to free speech. Nobody is obligated to tolerate you, no matter how in the right you may be. You can't force society to be on your side.

You might say, "But these social norms are repressive and harmful." Well then change them through activism. Stop whining about "free speech violations". That is, again, ass backwards.
Cryptography isn't a technology for keeping secrets, its a technology for keeping secrets in transit. Its not particularly useful for keeping multigenerational secrets (how do you do key management over 100 years?)
And those laws make them accountable in explicitly specified manner to the President, who is empowered to remove them, but only for enumerated causes.
Annoying. Because it “compiles” to less optimal code than writing it explicitly.
"Optimize" meaning super shitty generative upscaling from VGA to 4K or something? Yeah, I’ll pass.
Grok 3: Another win for the bitter lesson
I interviewed with more than one corp chatbot maker and punchline would be "You answer leave policy questions".
Ah ok, I misunderstood. As far as I've seen, structured outputs is essentially "json-mode" with some constraints (i.e. guided decoding over a known schema) - so the model effectively emits valid JSON that conforms to the schema. In function calling, the model is asked to emit "code" that conforms to some function parameter spec. You could use json-mode for function-calling, but probably not the other way around.

I've generally found json-mode to be more useful than function-calling, even though the latter is what everyone fixates on because of it's obvious use in agents.
Actually it IS google's problem. They don't publish through traditional academic venues unless it suits them (much like OpenAI/Anthropic, often snubbing places like NeurIPS due to not wanting to MIT open source their code/models which peer reviewers demand) and them demanding so many GPUs chokes supply for the rest of the field - a field which they rely on the free labor of to make complimentary technologies to their models.
I firmly oppose the use of LSD under any circumstances, as it often marks the beginning of self-destruction, no matter how justified the reasons may seem. In my experience, those who have used LSD inevitably see their lives spiral into chaos.