skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think there's a big difference between enterprise IT folks who can specify hardware with good IPv6 support, and which are able to switch internet providers if they don't support IPv6 well.

It's entirely a different thing for home users which get handed some shitty router from the only ISP around.

My options are cable or long-distance ADSL. The cable ISP has dynamic prefix, so I get a new prefix every week or so. If you contact them regarding IPv6 there's zero support, I had to find the prefix length by trial and error.

So much software relies on the prefix being fixed, so this can lead to a lot of frustration. On the bright side I actually get a prefix, some just get a /64.

IPv6 might not be hard, but using IPv6 might indeed be hard.
It would be if it was true.

He apparently did clone his dogs but can you point to the source material (in this case Milei) about speaking with them telepathically?

This just sounds super made up.

I've listen to his interview with Lex F. and his WEF speech and he sounded like a principled free market advocate. Not a single thing he said was crazy so I wonder where did you get this factoid.

Milei has certainly been smeared as right-wing so I wouldn't be surprised with other smears as well.
People only look at the state of Ukraine and think that because Russia didn't steam roll them things aren't working. I feel like it is quite successful. The previous status quo has been disrupted. America has gone crazy and retreated from Europe. This followed Brexit. And Russia has been successful at stealing Ukrainian resources, for example, Bellingcat was able to track approximately 3 billion dollars in stolen grain sales that Russia sold to places like Egypt. Is that how we want the world to work? You can take what you want by force and then sell it to the highest bidder? And now America pushes for Ukraine to give up lands? Do we believe it's okay to attack your neighbors to steal their stuff? Why is any of this acceptable? It is not a negotiation to say, "what is yours is now mine but I will give back some of it if you stop trying to fight to keep all of it."
It would be more constructive if you guys posted the correct numbers and a source.
I cannot give statistics but I think viruses in the sea are for marine life and mostly they don't target humans. Also we are already inhaling lots of viruses.
Even with the partial overturn, it is perfectly clear there are limits to freedom of expression. The poster before you clearly mistakes "a high bar" to "no bar at all".
Look up “leggi fascistissime”.
It’s appalling how people don’t see the obvious playbook that’s unfolding here, down to the claims of “defending democracy”
To be fair, being eaten by a whale is a pretty old sea-based-fear. I think Jonah was knocking around the place around 2800 years ago...
Hello everyone, I've quickly built a proof of concept here. I'm interested on tracking how different AI models perceive brands. This can be used for marketing research, SEO and more.

Here you have some public dashboards:

- Sendgrid: https://oparse.com/brands/b5uh7u1zpvzh/prompts
- Coca Cola: https://oparse.com/brands/kcvcgdw191h9/prompts

If you are interested on something like this, or working with me just reach out at username at gmail.com
I think the author is German (inferred from the TLD), so that might just be the language barrier.
I think it is critical to not forget the context of russian aligned bots getting free reign on Twitter, they are not being blocked, and Musk is keeping close ties to Putin.
Absolutely no one should be surprised anymore. It was all a projection.
It most certainly is. In most cases, it is much easier to find a job while you have a job than it is to find a job when you don't have a job. The action isn't "quit preemptively", the action is finding another job now, instead of making some other investment you would With your time today.
> The president doesn't have to spend on fraud but he doesn't get to decide lawful Congressional agencies like CFPB and USAID are "waste" by his own metric, and shut them down unilaterally.

Those agencies still exist, they have just been shrunked down. For USAID, it's folded under State.

> If the agency is not doing what it's designed by Congress to do, we have an entire oversight system to handle that. IGs are there specifically for that purpose, but Trump fired them all.

No, that's not the role of the IG. The IG is focused on financial and management audits. It doesn't determine whether an agency is fulfilling the law set by Congress.

That's the job of the courts and Congress, which they can still do.

> Trump and Musk claim absolute authority over the executive, so any restrictions would be unlawful in their eyes.

Trump does have absolute authority over the executive. It's in the Constitution. He also has the ability to delegate his authority to US government employees like Musk.

However the President has obligations to execute the laws passed by Congress. Both the legislative (Congress) and judicial (courts) are the check on the executive and have a number of levers they can pull if Trump violates the Constitution.

This is all US civic 101 here.
I suspect most people that go this route (ie download and manage their own ebooks, then transfer them to their Kindle) use Calibre, which afaik, is unaffected by this change.

https://calibre-ebook.com/
> I've been using RWMutex'es around SQLite calls as a precaution since I couldn't quite figure out if it was safe for concurrent use. This is perhaps overkill?

You should not share sqlite connections between threads (or anything even remotely resembling threads): while the serialized mode ensures you won't corrupt the database, there is still per-connection state which may / will cause issues eventually e.g. [1][2][3]. Note that [1] does apply to read-only connections.

You can use separate connections concurrently. If you're using transactions and WAL mode you should have a pool of read-only connections (growable) and a single read/write connection. If you're not using multi-statement transactions (autocommit mode) then you can just have a pool.

[1] https://sqlite.org/c3ref/errcode.html

[2] https://sqlite.org/c3ref/last_insert_rowid.html (less of an issue now that sqlite has RETURNING)

[3] https://sqlite.org/c3ref/changes.html (possibly same)
Android, or at least the LineageOS version of Android, has had multi user support for a few versions. I use it to separate distinct functions like personal and work.

I really quite like it. It is limited to maybe five users, however, and the 'initial setup' user has more power over some elements of the phones settings than the secondary users.

A couple of my Xiaomi phones have had "second space", which is what Private Space sounds like. Essentially allowing multiple users, but restricting it to only a primary and a secondary rather than a primary and three or four secondaries (that raw Android actually supports).
If you are interested in the subject, also take a look at NetworkDisk[1] which enable users/devs of NetworkX[2] to work with graphs via SQLite.

[1] https://networkdisk.inria.fr/

[2] https://networkx.org/
I think you're putting words in their mouth (or should we say on their keyboard?).
> The only way to guarantee this is to ensure that nobody can collect your data in the first place.

It's possible to differentiate data collected by the government and other data collection. GDPR makes this difference easier.

> While the government of today might be benevolent, the government of tomorrow might not be.

That's either fear mongering or a slippery slope argument.
And why was CrimethInk banned then? because they didn't dox anyone, never called for violence against people or location.

Until a "free speech defender" can explain what CrimthInc did that was against free speech that warranted the ban (and not either ignore it or sweep it under the "mistake were made" rug), i will keep thinking they are only a Musk glazer, deal?
“The sea has never been friendly to man. At most it has been the accomplice of human restlessness.”

- Joseph Conrad
"Getting eaten by a whale" is a pretty long standing hoax topic it seems. James Bartley being just one example.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Bartley
I once flew with just those plus a toothbrush. Border control was very suspicious of me and was confused why I had no luggage or backpack.
Prior to Musk's purchase of Twitter, feminists who expressed the view that women and girls need single-sex spaces, and that males who identify as women aren't actually women and therefore shouldn't be allowed in these spaces, would be banned from the platform under the guise of "transphobia".

They were literally being silenced for expressing their criticism of the ideology of gender identity and how it is being used to disadvantage and oppress women and girls.

On X, however, they are free to state this without fear of censorship, due to the broadening of permissible speech on the platform. So while it might not be the "free speech absolutism" that Musk disingenuously claims, it's an improvement to the pre-Musk era of censorship.
Even granting that, you would want MORE LGBTQ+/minority speech. The more energy people spend arguing with each other about culture war, the more dividee they are and the less they have for trying to change inequality.

Trying to silence LGBTQ+ etc people goes directly against the goal you posit.
The latest game in the franchise is Alyx, which is the same setting and tone and done today~ish (...2020)
Its a weird grey area for sure. The best rationalization I have ever come up with is that when speech involves a legitimate threat to do harm, for example, that skips past just speech and can be seen as a step in actively planning to do harm. In certain situations, like murder or terrorism, we've agreed that simply planning to do it is a crime.

Combine the two and it isn't that you said something that is illegal, its that the statement is interpreted as a clear signal of actively planning to do something which itself is illegal.
I've been there (when it was 100GBs scale, 15 years ago), trust me, it can and do happen :)
This whole framing is nonsense. The US is the reserve currency of the world, and its influence in both economic and soft power has had massive ROI for the entire economy for decades. There is no other government that plays this role in the global economy, and it's a ridiculously advantageous one. The fact that a balance sheet shows the sum of the investments to achieve and maintain that as a deficit is not a reason to freak out, this is a drastic misunderstanding of how nation-scale economics work that comes from people who are only familiar with household and business budgets

But if we were concerned about the budget, contractors are drastically more expensive than federal agencies and are much more dubious in their value proposition for the state or the public. It's just that the people involved made their fortunes on cushy government contracts and corporate welfare, so they won't go after it. The whole "fiscal conservatism" concept has always been a massive grift and this is the most blatant and obvious it's ever been

And you're absolutely right in saying that the Democrats are on the same grift, as their strategy has shifted to triangulation in the last 40 years, though the economic shocks they tend to produce over this insanity are generally smaller. The fact is, neoliberal economics has failed to produce widespread domestic prosperity, was likely an attempt to loot modern economies for an oligarch class from the beginning, and people keep accepting doubling down on these policies because they've been systematically misinformed about economic cause and effect through trite little analogies
The price of the dollar doesn't mean too much, the real cost in USD of living is through the roof and the official inflation index is not reflecting that, what's worse, if your salary is in USD or was tied to USD now you earn even less because they are pegging it so it doesn't go up.

Perhaps he did slow down the inflation a bit, sure, but it's easy to cut government spending when you are basically going into debt with your citizens, not paying government salaries, government contracts, etc. Pretty much everyone in the public scientific or health sector has seen their purchasing power slashed to half, and some of those haven't been paid for a couple of months either.
Is Night Mode what you are looking for?

https://koreader.rocks/user_guide/#autowarmth
I would love this. Apple is notoriously bad at supporting dark mode extensions on their mobile browser.
Because as tech people, we love transitive hate of technologies. We love to hate something because some blogger hates it.
It was pretty dead last time I checked.
Until the Heritage Foundation succeeds in dismantling Wikipedia.
"I am ready to pay 1000000 USD to anyone who tortures and/or kills you or anyone in your family in the most gruesome way."

Isn't that free speech?
Thanks for the clarification.

I misread your top post as though it meant Signal was the main source for those things. Sorry for the confusion.
> laser ignition of napalm

Now we’re talking! Unfortunately I couldn’t figure out how to deploy something as viscous as napalm through my sprinkler system. I’ve been reduced to dropping it from a helicopter, the old school way.
Your logic here is circular. You're arguing definitions, it doesn't make sense to point to examples of places that claim to have free speech and decide that free speech must have limits because those places said they have it and they have limits.

You could just as easily look at those places and say they must not actually have free speech because they have legal limits on what you say.
Ask HN: Is humor the next frontier for LLMs?
Not so long ago, we used to think that machines could be considered intelligent/creative/conscious/<some attribute deemed quintessentially human> if they could write a sonnet/summarize a book/paint a portrait/tell a joke, or whatever. Back then, all these tasks seemed technologically far beyond our reach.

Today, some of those have been achieved: even if they don't produce truly _good_ poems, LLMs are already better than the median human effort in poetry [1]. The same goes for paintings, essays, and so on.

Yet humor remains a tough nut to crack. LLM-generated jokes often suffer from:

- off rhythms or pacing
- missing or telegraphed punchlines
- unintentionally absurd twists
- over-explanation of their own process
- reliance on weak wordplay

They do a decent job at generating satirical, Onion-style headlines, but longer humorous narratives still elude them.

So, could humor be the next frontier for LLMs? That is, not as evidence that they are intelligent/creative/conscious/<some attribute deemed quintessentially human>, but as the next area that is easy for humans yet hard for machines. Or am I just a bad prompter?

[1] Humans actually seem to prefer AI-generated poetry: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-76900-1
It's not rage, it's realism - musk is a classic example of extreme stalinism. If there are dozens of such instances on weekly basis and comrade musk is the one behind them, it's naive to think that this one isn't. Especially when it something that hurts his fragile ego. Which is not a secret anymore since plenty of his former employees have come forward. Hell, even the present day ones are coming forward but anonymously out of fear.
E-ink screens usually don't want dark mode, because of the weird way they have to refresh[0]. The effect of that is much more visible with white text on black background compared to the opposite.

There's however a dark mode still if you need it; go to the gear icon, screen, auto warmth and night mode. Tap the mode line to switch it from automatic settings (either on time schedule or coordinates) to manual.

[0]: Basically, E-ink displays have to fully "reset" their screen by repeatedly toggling the pixels on and off, since they can't fully toggle themselves off normally; doing so will leave them with a bit of grey. Because this isn't very friendly on the eyes, most displays usually do this every couple "page changes" (actual pages when reading or moving in a menu.)
> But the “living constitution” is nothing more than imposing one’s ideological priors onto the document.

That overlooks a key distinction: An "ideological prior" that's proved to be supported by real-world evidence (i.e., experience) is no longer an ideological prior.

Analogously: Special- and general relativity were just theories in 1905 and 1915 (their respective publication dates). Over decades, real-world evidence proved that they were, in the main, correct — but we still don't treat either as a sacred, immutable text.

The unitary-executive view is an untested theory, an ideological prior. In contrast, our existing administrative state is supported by close to a century of real-world experience.

That's not to say that modifications aren't needed in the modern state. We don't want to make a golden calf of the granular details of FDR's or the Warren Court's approaches, any more than we want to enshrine the unitary-executive model or the Alito-Thomas perspective.

But in a country with some 340 million people that's been the source of the reasonably-successful Pax Americana, it's incredibly risky to go unilaterally f*cking around — it's the equivalent of a teenaged driver insisting that he can refuel his car and change the oil while driving 75 mph on a crowded freeway.
Postgres Compatability Index
I've been sending files to my Kindle for years, I've never seen that.
> We’re at this weird inflection point in software development. Every junior dev I talk to has Copilot or Claude or GPT running 24/7. They’re shipping code faster than ever. But when I dig deeper into their understanding of what they’re shipping? That’s where things get concerning.

I assume that 20-30 years ago when juniors were using either ide-provided auto-completion or refactoring or gui designers some old graybeard developer had a similar reaction.

Nothing new under the sun.

On a different layer of thinking, it makes perfect sense. The more the computing industry progresses, the more it abstracts away from how the thing actually works.

I don't know the author of this post, but as a system engineer that works closely with many software engineers, there are so many of them that yap left and right about the code they wrote or the ecosystem around their main programming language but are completely hopeless to anything outside that scope. I've seen so many re-implement the wheel because they don't know about facilities provided by the operating system (let alone how to interface and make use of them).

There's so much stuff that's done by the kernel (linux) and could be re-used if somebody was able to dive into FFI and write the adequate wrappers. And that's just an example.

One might argue that junior developers are just starting at a higher level of abstraction.
DeepSeek: A 100-Person Team Built an AI Model Rivaling GPT-4
DeepSeek's approach to AI development stands out:

- Team of ~100 engineers, mostly fresh graduates
- Developed novel MLA (Multi-head Latent Attention) architecture reducing memory usage to 5-13% of traditional architectures
- Achieved similar performance to GPT-4 at 1/70th the cost
- Founder focuses on fundamental research over commercialization
- Unusual organizational structure: no KPIs, unlimited computing resources for engineers

The most interesting part is their approach to innovation: unlike most Chinese tech companies that focus on application innovation, they're doing fundamental architecture research, challenging the notion that only Western companies can lead in core tech innovation.
I don’t have the freedom to say how I feel this. But I have been studying the great helmsman recently and soon we will all have an exchange of views.
ChatGPT has autocomplete? I honestly haven't noticed, and I use it all the time.
None of these is an example of someone in one of those professions committing malpractice on their employer's instruction.
The difference is that freedom of speech is concerned with what the Government allows you to talk about.

X, through Musk, is now a quasi-governmental platform - as can demonstrated by actions like this.
I'd recommend Death Stranding and Control.
> the more people you have in a limited area,

The US is huge with a low population density, why not just expand the cities a bit or build a few new ones? Is there some reason why this can't be done?
As are most commercial UNIXes.
Can sim drivers make the shift to F1? Max Verstappen thinks so
There's a thick, bright red line on the floor, as it were. On this side on the line, you have a country whose government respects the private tax data of citizens, controlling who has access to it with some kind of due process. On the other side of the line, you have a country that does not. Let's hope the US government, via DOGE, remains on this side of the line.
Walking the Doge
He worked for various years as senior economist in a bank, and a high position in an economy consulting firm.

You are systematically commenting trying to harm his reputation in issues not linked to his disreputable act of promotion of the shitcoin.
Goodluck and Godspeed my friend
I think they'd be very helpful for anything involving an airless body, e.g the moon. At least as a bootstrap — when we get going, we might want to do megastructure-scale electromagnets so humans can survive the gee-forces.

(We can't do megastructure-scale electromagnets right now: while they would work and China has a big enough industrial base, nobody on Earth is in the mood for anyone talking about building a 1000km diameter electromagnet significantly stronger than Earth's magnetic field).
Now how do you do it on your phone or windows laptop? :)

What if you have multiple internet connections and you want to choose which one you go through? With ipv4 and nat you can just change the default route. And you don't even need to write down the router's address since it's <your prefix for the whole network> dot one number.
Farewell to Bs Ad Metrics
Yes, Milei is a amazing economist.
Yes, Milei and his team are improving the Argentinian economy more than anyone could have ever imagined after a single year.
Yes, Milei f*cked up incredibly and might be subject to legal consequences.

All three are true at the same time. Don't mix things up.
The rules on doxing are applied haphazardly.

Musk is fine with censorship with his Chinese CCP friends, anyway, so the hypocrisy is as big as his Melon.
As Wall Street has chases Profits, Fire Depts have paid the Price
Yeah, I had to disable it for non-code formats like Wikitext, Markdown etc. Seeing the autocomplete suggestions made me feel dumber, like I was getting railroaded into lower quality thoughts or expressions of thoughts.

Mostly I use comments for prompting code, so it's also not very useful for it to be auto-completing comments there.

The one time that it was incredible helpful was when I was writing JSDoc for a library. It was so fast at generating documentation and especially examples, it turned the task from something I would probably never have done due to tedium, to something I knocked over in 20 minutes.
He may use Signal, but he does not want people on X to advertise their presence on any competing platforms. It is a childish and protectionist policy, and in no way align with his Free Speech® claims.

It was the same when URLs to Mastodon/Fediverse instances was banned on X, in an attempt to hamper the network effect for those who migrated. Meta does the same with Pixelfed these days, to hamper migration away from Instagram.

Elon and Mark are all for competition and free markets, but as soon as alternatives that can't be bought and controlled pops up, they outright ban any mention of it on their platforms.
> and I think we all know what....

No, I haven’t got a clue.