skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>If Apple believes the warnings are valuable...

>Why not apply them to their own ecosystem?

OP is only claiming that warnings for third party tracking is valuable. I'm not sure you go from that to "we should have warnings for first party tracking (ie. GDPR-style cookie banners)".
There are many papers that use a recurrence across sub-sequences and attention within sub-sequences. Google did this with Infini-Attention and one of the variants from the Titans paper. However, I think the earliest example of this is Transformer-XL.
It’s slow, and the task/setting key resolution makes no sense unless you waste several hours reading sbt docs (time I will never get back). I’m not saying dump sbt for mill but u gotta admit sbt kinda sucks. Afaik this is also the conclusion most larger orgs that use scala come to when they start calling scalac from bazel or similar.
Ooooh, I can answer the title! It's because writing and contributing code is so much easier today. And if you've stopped reading to write a comment about how I'm wrong you've already misunderstood me.

The "graybeard barrier" (which I dispute is a thing worthy of a specific name) is considered a feature. It's hard on purpose. Anything with a low barrier to entry automatically gains an additional significant amount of noise. Case in point, YouTube comments. I've never been in an IRC channel that has been even a miniscule fraction of how asinine the average discord chat can be. The graybeard filter isn't perfect, but it without a doubt lowers the number of drive-by nonsense, and selects for people who are more committed. The worst Or recent drama on LKML doesn't even come close to the venom or stupidity you'll get in GitHub comments.

If you're not already committed to linux, and just wanna volunteer something low effort to start, to see if you enjoy it, and see if it's actually worth your time. Why would you do something hard, when there's plenty of easy to contribute to projects on GitHub? I wouldn't. Why are young coders struggling to break through? because they're given the choice, do something easy or do something hard... you don't know if you'll actually enjoy it yet. No sane person would pick the hard one unless they were already bored with the easy one.
I’m sure Apple has done the math and calculated where the true power lies.
Mental note: a startup catering to Polio victims...
100ft isn't anywhere near an acceptable margin. The helicopter may bear the immediate blame due to going above the altitude limit, but ultimately the design of this corridor was completely nuts.

This seems like a classic normalization of deviance. Reportedly there were literally a hundred automated collision warnings between airliners and helicopters in this area over the past decade. One such warning should raise eyebrows. Two should start people thinking there's a systemic problem. More than a handful should prompt an investigation to resolve the root cause of the conflicts. Instead, they (at least the system as a whole) seem to have decided that they weren't a real problem because nothing had happened yet.
Ask HN: How to get involved in developing and researching LLMs?
Hey HN, how does an independent dev get involved in developing and researching LLM models?

Bit of background - I have a CS background/undergrad, have caught up on the academics of attention, transformers, etc, have worked in the software industry for ~10 years and even built some small deep learning networks in PyTorch for various POCs (including a small transformer). I really want to get into researching, finetuning, testing new architectures, etc, for LLMs because I view it as more interesting than doing a wrapper SaaS product (my interest is more towards research than product).

But I'm not sure how to really get into foundation model LLMs in a meaningful way as an individual. I'm not part of a university research group, haven't gotten anywhere applying to the big AI companies (I'm just some dev dude without a PhD or name school), and I don't have the scale of compute/GPUs to do my own self-experimentation and research. I have a single 12gb vram GPU, but I doubt that gets me anywhere interesting.

So what exactly could I do? Open to any creative and practical ideas.
Thats the kollsman window and as far as i am concerned is pretty common also in modern avionics?
The blogpost in the first link doesn't mention Preact at all.

Preact is mostly API-compatible with React, and it having a different underlying model is an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence.

I've read the docs on Preact signals, and they look like React refs, but put outside of components.

edit: the last paragraph about refs
> A spokesperson from the Information Commissioner's Office - the UK's data watchdog - told BBC News that firms should not discourage the use of AI in work.

> The spokesperson added: "With AI offering people countless ways to work more efficiently and effectively, the answer cannot be for organisations to outlaw the use of AI and drive staff to use it under the radar.

What the hell is going on with the UK government these days? We do not need AI generated laws/representation. This can open a huge can of worms legally.
I don't think this is a bad thing. Pretty much all of the author's examples of "new and potentially superior technologies" are really just different flavors of developer UX for doing the same things you could do with the "old" libraries/technologies.

In a world where AI is writing the code, who cares what libraries it is using? I don't really have to touch the code that much, I just need it to work. That's the future we're headed for, at lightning speed.
"I never thought the leopard would eat my face!"
Because you need to be close to the other venues where the symbol trades.
Sure, I'll try to catch it in action and send you something useful.
Why would a can of coconut milk have a drawing of a bell pepper obscuring the writing? How does that make ANY sense at all?
Jeff atwood, stack overflow co-founder, joins /e/OS company as shareholder
No, it was designed to shield law enforcement officers violating the Ku Klux Klan Act from legitimate lawsuits. See [1], which is the case where it started. Qualified immunity is only relevant when the lawsuit is not frivolous anyway...

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierson_v._Ray
Nvidia’s GPU root of trust, where they are using SPARK, is based on RISC-V, they have a talk about that choice, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43045952
No worries, cool app by the way. This is Firefox on Linux.
100 ft. of separation is an idiotic safety margin.
https://datingzest.com/tinder-statistics/

This claims tinder is 78% male. Not sure of the others.
I am basing that theory on organized crime history and present in the USA. You don't hear about it much as the incidents are suppressed from most mainstream media to avoid copy-cats and that's not even getting into the excessive ways in which the cartels operate. It's one of the reasons judges usually have tunnels from the courthouses to a private secure parking area or why in rural areas the courthouse and sheriffs office is often in the same building.
Please see my response to parent
Why do you need my location to tell me a poem?
These are all flagged. I am curious how network security is not relevant to this community and breaks the site rules?
I have no problem with some sort of good faith immunity where through some factors it was determined they were in the wrong but were operating in good faith / honest mistake. Yeah it will be vague, but I think it is required to be able to do things where ... you do get to infringe on people's rights (legally or not).

Having said that the example, there was no warrant and the sheriff had no reason to do what they did within the normal function of the job (sharing people's nudie pics...) ... that should be EASILY outside the bounds of QI

This case seems like the poster child where IQ enters he realm of of absurdity and degrades people's lack of trust in institutions. It also seems like an example where a more reasonable form of QI would thrive.
There are some interesting connections between them. If you remove the softmax from the attention formula, you end up with linear attention, which has a recurrent form.

I haven't read it, but the Mamba 2 paper claims to establish a stronger connection.
He doesn't have that amount of money right now. He may never have it. They are taking a massive risk at a great expense to themselves. He may never find the hard drive, it may be unreadable, his memory maybe incorrect and he doesn't have the key on there, and so on. The council would be taking a pointless risk.
Yup. It's often much worse.

Although that person may be lumping in the research professorships and various ass. dean positions.
Interesting. Can it collect garbage _concurrently_ in WASM?
SSN doesn’t give them your parents and siblings social media accounts. They are basically farming out intelligence gathering not doxing.
Good point. I always assume others in tech also manage to live well below their means.
Because TT very publicly crediting Trump with them getting back online. That fed Trump’s ego (most important) and also put Trump in a position of being seen as saving them (popular). Clever move.
I honestly love OpenSUSE. About the only negative thing I can say about it is that zypper, an otherwise perfect package manager, is really, absurdly slow.
Claiming thst the phrase “extremely important” is indicative of AI authorship is preposterous.
The fact that she claimed her boyfriend is a sheriff's deputy, so his bosses wanted to look at her phone for evidence that he was involved in crimes. It allows them to claim they had a legitimate reason to share the data other than just ogling the photos.

Which is all just to say: don't talk to cops and don't agree to searches, even if you think dating one will help you get out of trouble.
Oh pretty soon saying nothing isn’t going to be an option either.
Accuracy should always work to be the answer you want, which is the most useful answer for applications. That is "coconut milk", not "coconut cnbc". Maybe "cnbc" should even be included, but definitely not replacing the word "milk" in that location.
I'm also a little confused, because I remember such common empathy-lacking rhetoric like demanding boob pics of any proclaimed female on the internet being common in my tween online years. Or sending shock stuff as a joke (2girls1cup, tubgirl etc). So its not like the internet didn't have troll-y cesspits. And yet somehow something has changed such that as a population we've been trained against forming human connections. Even 4chan organized against scientology once upon a time, that required at minimum real organizational labor and forming some kind of community action. I can't imagine any similar thing happening now.
“might” be intentionally lying? Look at Trumps record, there is no “might”.
Or compared to the days of radio, having labels decide what's on the mainstream and the indie college stations doing the unpaid work (and giving listeners the gift) of discovering "lost" hits.
When I was learning SCUBA, one of our sessions happened in Tea Lake (learning how to do an emergency swim ascent). I can vouch for its name accurately representing its properties.
this is a great tool. can add it to my workflow easily. AI and language learning is awesome
Part of me wonders whether it is sincerely possible to violate someone's constitutional rights "in good faith". I feel like being a functional police officer should entail knowing the limits on your power, in the same way you're obligated to know what laws you're actually enforcing.
Are We Tripping? The Mirage of AI Hallucinations
this one? (What really happens inside a dating app)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42921659
That one's kind of a math problem.

Suppose you're selling your new drug for a net margin of $100/unit and then you put all of that back into R&D.

If you don't buy advertising, you sell 10,000 units and put $1M back into R&D.

If you buy $7M in advertising, you sell 100,000 units, get $10M, $7M goes to pay for the advertising and you put $3M back into R&D. Then you're spending more on advertising than R&D.

But then you're spending three times as much on R&D. So which one of these is better?
Step 1. Destroy the government

Step 2. See? The government doesn't work! Just like we said!

Step 3. "Fix" the problems created from Step 1

Step 4. MAGA eventually realizes the swamp was enlarged and made worse, not drained
>If you trust Apple with what they do on your iPhone, you should trust the third-party with what they do inside their app, there is no difference.

Why is trust an all or nothing proposition? Why can't I trust an app to do whatever it wants within its sandbox, but not to get an unique identifier that can be shared between apps? It's not any different than sandboxing, where I trust the app to do whatever it wants in its sandbox, but not mess with my documents or OS.
Universal health care isn't the only alternative. The fault is in the way private healthcare is structured in the US. Countries like Thailand and India have fully functioning and affordable private healthcare.
It's a bit like how the average internet comment is posted by a "frequent commenter". Probably another case of the Pareto distribution.
How? A centimillionaire has $10k, a hectomillionaire has $100m.
The "Pope Dollar"
I'm not a native speaker, and I see that I may have been unclear.

I was thinking of the human consequences. In my language they are almost synonyms.

They of course care about the outcome, but not the effect it has on the target group

It's strange how one can normalize cruelty. Just think of how prison rapes are joked about in media and movies, as if it is an accepted consequence of committing a crime. It is a cruel and evil act that many choose to simply ignore because it is so common
The concept of having everything accessible in one page is interesting and the UI is very clean !

I am curious how the AI powered PR reviews look like in real time, is there any demo available?
I once thought mass access to the internet would make society more intelligent and intellectual.. boy was I wrong.
checks and balances led to 36 trillion debt, they are not working
So how much more money will be spent on fiber optics and microwave towers?
Nobody cares about men's problems. There's a whole Netflix show about the Tinder Swindler but nothing like that for men. In the last 3 months I think I've dealt with at least 4 different scammers on dating apps. Those are just the obvious ones. Then you sometimes get the foreign women trying to get into the country.

Men are often suckers in dating, far more than women. I mean at least financially speaking there is no contest. Even offline it happens a lot, with men getting suckered for drinks, "foodie calls," and random gifts or financial assistance.
Not to victim-blame, here... Obviously the DA and sheriff are scumbags. But, in this day and age, the privacy battle is either lost or mostly lost. As a general rule, it's probably not a good idea to keep private stuff on your phone anymore. Or, worse, in the cloud. Keep them somewhere that they at least need a warrant and/or your consent to search (and even that really isn't good enough anymore, thanks to all the abuse going on).

We should be able to rely on the law to keep the contents of our phones private but so far we can't. Don't put nudes on your phone (or just don't have nudes laying around at all!)
Simple, but hard to push through. The often politically powerful police don't want that to happen.
Why wouldn't you say negative things about ICE? They suck, and are constantly coming up with ridiculous schemes like this to avoid criticism for the evils they're very aware they commit. Fuck ICE.
one person's evil espionage is another (significantly different) person's intercultural relations, albeit unofficial ones.
I think he got so odious that people created euphemism for him to avoid getting blocked by automatic filters when discussing him.
Sending files to a remote server is never something that should need to be disabled, this must be an opt-in or it's time for a fork.
AFAIK currently only one contributor is working at Microsoft.
If your complaint is "the pathway to legal citizenship should be reformed", ICE is the wrong target.
USDS/website (GitHub repo for usds.gov Jekyll deployment)
I fully expect captchas to incorporate "type the racial slur / death threat into the box" soon, as the widely available models will balk at it.
The solution to the button problem is obviously to intercept the call to the underlying API that draws the button. Ideally, by having a generic interface so that you can change the "color override" behavior at runtime. It means that in the future, all you have to do will be to specify your behavior in a JSON file that is dynamically loaded. You can also leverage the already present JS interpreter to specify rules (keep things simple, we don't want to have another domain specific language). To make the code more testable, the JSON file reader will be abstracted away and "mockable".
I noticed this as I experimented with alternatives for React and all of them I tried were terrible on OpenAI/ChatGPT. Either it doesn't know them, or it makes weird mistakes, or uses very outdated (no longer working) versions of the code.

It is also annoying that most modern JS things have 4 versions to do the same thing: With TS, With TS + Decorators, With plain JS, with JSX, etc. so code generation picks one that isn't compatible with the "mode" you use.
If the LLM did anything besides try to explain the Efficient Market Hypothesis in response, it failed.
Men generally avoid posting their L's.
>I'm not going to litigate it with you though. Google it. It's a common strategy for a company to perform an 83(b) election on your behalf when they grant you RSU's. This way, you don't have to pay taxes as the RSU's vest.

No need to litigate or use internet search, I can just read Section 83(b) of subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code[0]. Also, the election must be made on your own tax return, no one else can make it "on your behalf".

You have not explained what part of my comment in inaccurate.

Many companies are as ignorant of the actual law as their employees.

[0]https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/83
* If you remove the softmax from the attention formula, you end up with linear attention*

Sorry, what?
I resent your paternalism a little. I understand your opinion, but please don't patronize me or anyone that might think like me. Nobody needs to get over anything that is important to them, despite not walking barefoot in the snow uphill both ways. Small problems for you can be larger for others.

If you're comfortable hypothetically giving up extra free hours in the day for a company that's fine, but please don't try to make me feel guilty for wanting something else in life.

> is not your employers problem

Of course it's my employer's problem, If I'm unhappy at work I do a less good job. It's baffling to me, and forgive me for being patronizing in turn, that individual people can have the same mentality as organizations, where people are just replaceable cogs in the machine. Yes you can replace them, but the cost, monetary and of knowledge is greater than retaining them.
Scraping the Web in 2025
This meshes well with the established policies of the Republican party, which is to campaign on how badly the Government runs, promise to fix it, get into office, then break the Government more, then run back to your constituency and say "I can't believe how bad the Government is, get me back in there so I can keep working on it."
I've suspected the same when people are critical of AI.
It’s not a single party dictatorship, it’s a single populist leader dictatorship. The original GOP hates Trump but they care more about being re-elected because his fan base is so rabid and he and Musk are so retaliatory. Look what happened to Liz Cheney. The only people who can defy him now are the few about to retire/die and not seeking reelection (McConnell).
Learning assembly for fun, performance and profit
Gentle reminder that news reporting is not a representative sample of, well, just about anything. It's highly selected and filtered through several layers. The same is true of a survey of internet posts, or online surveys btw. It's very hard to get representative samples.
Let's use the word "disdain". I don't think the majority of voters have disdain for federal workers, but the people engaging in these actions certainly seem to.
I used this in a previous role. The answer is, we had a server side solution that we wanted to make available on clients that had no internet connection. The logic was complex, and this allowed us to ship much faster.
100% of people who dislike systemd can't come up with a better solution that solves all of the problems that systemd was created to solve.
I think you've missed out a crucial detail of the joke...
Well, I guess there is simply fundamental disagreement. Some people dislike arbitrary discrimination. And others think that encouraging it is “networking” and discouraging it is literally Nazism.
> Part of me wonders whether it is sincerely possible to violate someone's constitutional rights "in good faith".

Person running down the sidewalk pursued by someone shouting "stop, thief!" gets tackled by a cop and cuffed. Turns out to be mistaken identity or they'd done self-checkout. Rights violation? Yes. Good faith? Also, yes.
At least Java is good. React is absolutely terrible.
Can you say more about those risks and benefits?
I went to Lake Superior and it was soooo cold to me.
> The entire music community has been complaining about how old music gets more recommendations on streaming platforms, necessarily making it harder for new music to break out.

I can understand other issues, but this has nothing to do with that. Models don't have to be re-trained to recommend new music. That's not how recommendation systems work.
> Real capitalism would let those entities fail so others can pick them apart and attempt to do better.

This is what real capitalism does. It has a built-in incentive to support a state that enables firms to socialize the losses and privatize the profits.
Trump is breaking the law, but Congress has no interest in holding him accountable - and they're the only institution Congress specifies for having the authority to hold the president accountable.

So...Trump is breaking the law and getting away with it. What else is new?
This is the right answer. This is a job, something each individual worker signed up for, and continues to show up for. They're not being forced to carry out their work, and actions have consequences. They need to accept those consequences, or find a new line of work, preferably the latter because fuck ICE and its employees.
Such a funny take. It is nominated by the legally elected president. If you want to emphasize their financial status, why don't you look at Soros, some democrats who officially have salaries in the range of $100k-$200k yet have net worth in tenths of millions?

On the other hand it'd be strange to see that no one involved in corruption that DOGE tries to reveal would do something to attack it.
> the Parliament building is still called Reichstag even if there is no Reich no more

"Reich" isn‘t a Nazi thing. The building was already called that decades earlier. It goes back to the last German emperor, and Reich actually means empire. The Roman Empire is also called Römisches Reich.
They probably simply read “native american citizens” as referring to Natives Americans. There’s no need to cast aspirations.
> I think it's clear that QI sometimes leads to bad outcomes, but honestly, I'm not sure how the system would function without some similar concept.

You’re not sure how Colorado could possibly exist?
I mean if you elect clowns, you can't really complain when you get a circus.
Mata Hari comes to mind. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mata_Hari