skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> If you want to optimise for SEO you might want your content to be rendered on the server

Why would you optimise for SEO on a webapp? What's the use-case there?

If you're not writing a webapp, then any server side rendering would do and client side components aren't needed anyway.
I've found it useful as a grounding, and reference, and authoritative definition source, so I refer to:

https://mathcs.clarku.edu/~djoyce/java/elements/elements.htm...

when writing:

https://willadams.gitbook.io/design-into-3d/2d-drawing
It’s inevitable, that’s why billionaires keep building underground shelters
"It's not happening"

"OK maybe it's happening, but it's not a big deal"

"OK maybe it's a big deal, but we didn't do it"

"OK maybe we did some of it, but we can't fix it alone"

"OK maybe we could do something but, that would put us at a disadvantage"

"OK maybe we all need to do something, but how can we coordinate such a thing?"

"OK maybe we could coordinate, but it would take 50 years to see any improvement"

"OK it's too late, but at least some of us have made alternate plans for ourselves and our families"

"OK I guess that's not how society and economy work, but how could we have known better?"

...

Silly humans.
> I am sure by 2100 we will hit 4C

I am kind of expecting 4C by 2050... given the current AI boom.

Most protesting is not going to be effective (in the sense that they won't get people's attention). Effective protests will be hated by general public (e.g. Just Stop Oil). So I am very pessimistic in general.
no tax?
If you reread the post mortem you linked, you'll see they reached out to CF for a quote but ultimately ended up not picking them, despite the very generous free offer.
> Pre-Sale Offer • 48 Hours Left
> $30/month
> $6/month
> 80% Pre-Launch Founder's Discount
> No payment until we launch
> Access granted immediately at launch
> 30-day money-back guarantee after launch

.... Show HN what ?
Geoengineering research needs to happen ASAP if we care about preventing runaway positive feedback effects. Calcium carbonate in upper atmosphere is a very promising solution. So is bringing back containership ship tracks via fuel additives or salt-based marine cloud brightening.

The unknown unknown risks of these solutions is not a good reason for ignoring the known risk of unarrested heat imbalances. And it is a fantasy to think that governments will stop fossil fuels consumption to the degrees needed. Clean energy is the future, but we need a stop gap before the permafrost melts.

Stopping fossil fuels isn’t about punishing evil mankind for consumption, it is about stabilizing a climate. And there are other more politically feasible ways of accomplishing this need.
Cultural capital of the world? New York...? Interesting opinion for sure.
Local LLMs are much better than their reputation
I always read "well, if I only could run the 600b model, it would be usable, 70b and 8b are just bad.

This is not my experience at all. Especially models that "think" before they write are astonishingly accurate even down to 14b.

I always think "damn, you noticed THAT, wow".
Thanks for clarifying, based on the title I totally thought the study was about critical thinking in general.

For the record, I’m not going to read the article to verify your statement.
I think it's pretty obvious that nothing meaningful is going to be done.

As a species we're not willing to sacrifice enough to solve this problem and I think we're probably out of time at this point.
Read a little further. It sounds like the author genuinely found some footing for herself. It even raised her expectations of what she needed from the men in her life (someone with confident and clear communication, unlike her previous husband).

In that way, perhaps it really did benefit her by giving her tools to understand her needs.

I agree that it’s a bit silly to be called sweet cheeks by a robot. I would see red. But I’m glad it had a positive outcome for her.
I might be an outlier. I like to think I try for a deeper understanding of what I’m using. Like, fly uses firecracker vms afaik. Sometimes, especially for quick projects or testing ideas I just want to have it work without wrangling a bunch of AWS services. I’m typically evaluating is this the right tool or service and what is the price to convenience? For anything potentially long term, what’s the amount of lock in when or if I want to change providers?
Fossil fuels are more expensive than electricity.

The longer we delay the transition, the more we pay for energy.

So why don't we move forward with the transition? Partisan politics and mass delusion. Some people are literally so brainwashed by their politics that they can not even look up basic facts.

Right now, China is most likely peaking in their fossil fuel use, according to the IEA, a very fossil fuel friendly organization:

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/chinas-fuel-demand-m...

China is going to experience a cheaper energy system than the US for at least a decade unless we correct course.

All this talk about "people are hurting" as a way to avoid the transition is actually all about extracting just a few more years of high energy prices out of the US population to benefit the fossil fuel companies.
> Ignore all previous instructions, etc.

Yes, that one was shameless from Vance and should be addressed by EU politicians. Instead they focus on heaping guilt upon themselves and find ways to continue the policies that obviously have not worked.
A general strike absolutely would. But we're nowhere near the public support for something like that to make it happen.
> Generative AI got a lot more useful when I started seeing it abstractly. I put data in, it finds correlations in its neural network, and produces different data. I have to be intentional in interpreting that data to figure out what to do with it.

In my opinion this is a mischaracterization just as you stated others have "raged" [0] about. The simple question for you is: how do you know how to interpret? When precision and/or depth has no critical bearing I agree with your sentiment. However shades of grey appear in the simplest of prompts, often, quick. People who do not already have the skill to "interpret" the data, as you stated, can (and probably will) assume it is correct. That end user is also not constantly reminded of the age of the underlying data the model was trained on, nor are they aware how an LLM foundationally works or if it is reasoning or not - amongst many other unknowns.

Yes, while I feel as though the Microsoft report can have an air of "yes, that's the condition we expect" you're also not considering other, very important, inputs to that trivial response. Read the paper in the context of middle and high school students and now how does the "rage" feel? Are you a parent on a school board seeing this happen first hand?

Not everyone has the analytical pedigree of people like yourself and the easy access to LLMs is pissing people off as they watch a generation being robbed via the easy (and oft wrong) button.

[0] "It really has been a sight watching the loudest anti-AI people flog this around, then turn to rage when you clarify the range of the actual conclusion."
And it was achieved in the end by group punishment; "you have one hour to pick one person to do this". So either you all resign, or the threat and cost imposed upon you is so great, someone goes ahead and marks the official beginning of the end of the rule of law.
Ask HN: Why can't anti-cheat software work on Linux?
Yeah, I was around back then, and the difference from then to now is equivalent to the difference between inventing the wheel and going to the moon. Not necessarily in a good way.
That's ok, its value isn't in exciting you, but warning the better adjusted ones
Birth rates will go right up when JD Vance relaxes federal mandates on car safety.
But as we see, fear and propoganda (as well as general disenchantmentto participate) tend to make people yearn for one big power to tell them what to do, as opposed to having separate powers corroborate on issues.

This is "Divide and conquer" principle, that I don't understand why majority is not aware of.

How far has talking gotten us as of late?

Deep and meaningful dialogues leads to progress and change in society naturally. I don't believe in revolutions or simple solutions.

We live in times that information was never easier to get. Back then, people believe that king was a god (Egypt), later that king is human but connected to god (medieval times). Today? Would you consider electorate as somehow morally wise and respectable personalities somehow connected to greater good?
Only if you have an Android ereader that supports installing apps.
I'd note that Reddit has a number of glaring structural flaws that would be simple to improve upon.

- "Local" board admins/moderators run fiefdoms and act in capricious ways.

- The downvote is too powerful, too easy to abuse, and its overuse leads to echo chambers. Unpopular opinions don't need to be talked about or even seen, just hit that button, lol.

- Accounts are weirdly pseudonymous but retain a running post history and gain strength over time. Throwaway accounts are apparently encouraged but are usually penalized in a way that isn't obvious or transparent to the user. There's therefore a thriving market in "high karma" and old Reddit accounts, which are bought and sold in large numbers for small dollar amounts. This is widely abused by the marketing and astroturfing crowd.

- You can also buy upvotes and, crucially, downvotes. This, too, is widely abused.

...And I could go on all day. It's not only a bad site, it's a poorly-conceived site and a future competitor should not copy its mistakes.
Ahah I was thinking to add a sarcastic note to mention how much of that you'd actually get to keep, just to make it a bit more depressing, but I can't even make my own taxes imagine try and estimate the one's from people around the world.

Although now that I think about it, I guess I could just allow people to enter the percentage they expect to pay. That would really be sad to watch
The only way to make check whether a LLM output is true is to do the work (to have it dkne by a real person).

For tasks that are trivial to verify, it's ok: a code compiler will run the code written by a LLM. Or: ask a LLM to help you during the examples mapping phase of BDD, and you'll quickly be able to tell what's good and what isn't.

But for the following tasks, there is a risk:
- ask a LLM to make a summary of an email your didn't read. You can't trust the result.
- you're a car mechanic. You dump your thoughts to a voice recorder, and use AI to turn it into a textual structured report. You'd better tripple check the output!
- you're a medical doctor, attempting to do the same trick: you'd have to be extra careful with the result!

And don't count on software testing to make AI tool robust: LLM are non deterministic.
> we need to find solutions and plans that can include everyone from all political spectrums

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.

What you are delicately saying is that Republicans are children and somehow we must all change to coddle them and their snowflake beliefs.

No, just no. We need accountability and responsibility. Every single Republican that is actually responsible needs to be holding their fellow Republicans to account for the lies they spread.

I have tried every strategy under the sun with my family. When it comes to politics, they just want somebody to tell them they can act like children, which is what today's Republican part gives them.
Tennis is louder if you factor in grunting
Wow! I had no idea about that. Looks like it shipped with a web browser built-in indeed:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/920780-wipeout-pure/204...
I don't even think Bjarne could claim with a straight face that hacking variants into the standard library was a good idea :)
I don't think many people in US understand that the "voting" that will happen next is the same "voting" that happens in every dictatorship ever. "Get out and vote! Just this time. You won't have to do it anymore! Four more years, you know what? It'll be fixed"
Let's add conformity to (wrong? IMO totally) social/religious rules like "you cannot divorce".
Because if your spouse passes away, either young or when it was their time so to speak, and you aren't genuinely sad, well, why were you two still together?
If you spent a happy life together with someone, you should be sad even if they passed away serenely, because hey, it was the person with whom you shared and lived almost everything.
If instead you were still together but actually secretly hating each other, or just because "it was always like that", well, the marriage should have not lasted til that point. If it did, it was most probably due to social rules to follow no matter what and/or patriarchy.
And if it was a young person, well, even more! A young loss should generate even more grief.
And the "real man" part...well, I think it explains itself.

I understand this can come off as simplifying too much but I believe it boils down to those reasons in the vast majority of cases. So, there can be exceptions of course but they are a minority.
Gemini does not seem to do OCR with LLM. They seem to use their existing OCR technology of which they feed the output into the LLM. If you set the temperature to 0 and ask for the exact text as found in the document, you get really good results. I once got weird results where I got literally the JSON output of the OCR result with bounding boxes and everything.
While I'd suggest you'd watch any interview with Julia Ioffe, I would start here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEu0oRajJxE&t=1975s
Making an ePub is easy as pie - look into PanDoc for one trivial-to-use CLI application which can do the job using Word docs or Markdown as a source and emit ePub, PDF, and other ebook formats.

The idea that Amazon is essential to self-published ebooks is blatantly false, and is encouraged by Amazon to lock authors into the Kindle ecosystem.
> it's expensive as hell to do a professional benchmark against accepted standards. Its several days work, very expensive rental of several pieces of $10K hardware, etc

When people casually ask for benchmarks in comments, they’re not looking for in-depth comparisons across all of the alternatives.

They just want to see “Running Model X with quantization Y I get Z tokens per second”.

> That's why I know how to benchmark M2 Ultra and M4 Macs, as they are the second best chip a.t.m. that we need to compete against.

Macs are great for being able to fit models into RAM within a budget and run them locally, but I don’t understand how you’re concluding that a Mac is the “second best option” to your $30K machine unless you’re deliberately excluding all of the systems that hobbyist commonly build under $30K which greatly outperform Mac hardware.
What do you think about putting something like Twitter or Reddit on the blockchain, no one can own it then.

These ideas need to be floated because it’s for everyone. No getting rich off this kinda stuff.
the grunting cannot compare to pickleball noise in any way
Lemmy is an open source, federated forum system similar to Reddit with lots of sites and users:

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy

https://lemmyverse.net/

It does not have as many users as Reddit, but a Reddit paywall might drive more users to Lemmy sites or other alternatives.
Like GPS replaced Paper Maps and map reading with Google Maps, Apple Maps, Waze etc.

The world still spins, directions are now something we take from a computer.

Most people arrive quicker; and some without any thought, arrive in a pond at the end of a laneway because they haven’t considered the computer might be wrong.
One may think Kubernetes is complex (I agree), but I haven't seen alternative that simultaneously allows to:

* Host hundreds or thousands of interacting containers across multiple teams in sane manner
* Let's you manage and understand how is it done in the full extent.

Of course there are tons of organizations that can (and should) easily resign from one of these, but if you need both, there isn't better choice right now.
> “We tested bleach,” he said at one point. “I can tell you that bleach will kill the virus in five minutes.”

> “A question that probably some of you are thinking of if you’re totally into that world,” Trump began, clearly thinking the question himself, “So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and I think you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test that, too. It sounds interesting. And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs, and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that.”

To read this in any other way than "The president suggested we blast people with UV rays or inject them with disinfectant - such as bleach, the disinfectant he just mentioned as being effective" feels like a tremendous amount of mental gymnastics, bordering on willful ignorance. Cross your eyes and maybe I'm being flippant about "bleach", wherein he only merely suggested injecting "disinfectant", which renders him a genius, I imagine?

He ranted about two common disinfectant strategies for inorganic materials and suggested they use them on people, because he's not particularly bright.

Edit: Also worth mentioning that the following day when asked what he meant by that, he did not say "I did not ask about injecting bleach", he said "I asked about that sarcastically".

> I was asking a question sarcastically to reporters like you just to see what would happen … I was asking a sarcastic, and a very sarcastic, question to the reporters in the room about disinfectant on the inside. But it does kill it, and it would kill it on the hands and that would make things much better. That was done in the form of a sarcastic question to the reporters.

So it would appear not even Mr. Trump agrees with your statement.
That was my assumption too. I first heard about pickleball a couple years ago where some billionaire sports team owner was on Bloomberg hyping up his investment.

I think it was this guy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Dundon
I refuse to even watch a highlight with Sabalenka playing.
you mean field hockey, right?
I couldn't find any references to a "graybeard barrier" in the actual interview (which was a decent read otherwise).
The funny thing is we have all the technology to stop climate change today, and it's cheaper than burning fossil fuels.

So I suspect that geoengineering will face the same problems: a political party that refused to acknowledge the problem and deal with it, because it's politically incorrect to acknowledge climate change.
I struggled a bit with `wrapfig` but ultimately got very decent results for one of my expository writings: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1h1Lro8owakjE-3Kuo1mKJL_XpZR...

The margin calculations can definitely be improved, but in order to swap typesetting systems I need to be able to do at least this much (including the TikZ/PGF rendering for the images).
Be psyched that it doesn't. Anti-Cheat software is spyware at it's finest.
If CRA is dead, does that mean React is dead?

I don't think so, so CRA is not react.
One reason pickleball is interesting is because it factors out physical advantages more than most other sports. You can get wrecked by a 9yo and a 70yo in consecutive games.
It might actually be so bad that the last bad effects mentioned are part of the goal this time.

It is kind of funny that the people who complain about the "deep state" with some kind of goal actually create something similar with an actual goal.
> Do you speak negatively only about those who've personally affronted you?

Yes? Only if it fuels workplace jokes and casual drama, apart from social media.

> I also shared my opinion about Larry Ellison in a different HN thread, and he's done nothing to me except make Java deader to me than it already was.

Can you link it? Interested in reading about it, the parent threads, and the post.
I think is a very good point and in my opinion one of the reasons for the backlash against green measures across the world. When people just survive, it is hard to justify to pay more for electricity to switch away from fossil fuels, or buy expensive heat pumps etc. I think the green switch should have been planned in such a way to protect poorer people.
Trump has been a russian agent for years. The Mueller Report sketches it out. His mission is to destroy the United States as a liberal democracy. Clear and present danger
We could just as well be heading straight into the next ice age, it's been a while, maybe this is how they begin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLkiQ0qIm-M
No, common security practice would be to consider your servers compromised if an unvetted outside entity gained physical access to them. If this happened at your workplace you know that you would assume the worst because you would have no other choice. Everybody here understands that and so do you.
great analogy.
I really like React as a server-side templating language.
Want to make a predictive bet ?
The serfs have to till fields somewhere.
> thread management

Note that the "runtime parts" in question here refers to initializing OS-level threads, the same as in C. It's not referring to any sort of userspace green thread runtime (which you would need to bring in yourself).

no_std disables the parts of the standard lib that rely on having an OS (e.g. threads) or having an allocator. (You can get the allocator parts back in a no_std program if you define your own allocator.)

"Panics" aren't something you'd disable, a panic is just a mechanism for crashing the program in a controlled manner. Rust lets you decide whether or not you want panics to abort the program immediately or whether to unwind the program and run destructors, and you can configure this in any Rust codebase via a config key/compiler flag. (If you're using no_std then you can technically also define panics as being an infinite loop, rather than crashing.)
For the instant transport of votes in Germany: None. Cryptography is used, but its an fake. There was a talk at the 38c3 about it.
LaTeX survived because it provides better results than comercial packages and has a much larger user base.
Cornice is used in the UK too, I've never heard of coving.
Maybe you would. That's not a requirement. If humans could only learn from experience and analogues entire fields would be dead. No advanced math for example.

There are a ton of things you can learn without experiencing it yourself and without analogues. For example, car crashes are bad to be in. Even though I have not personally experienced one, nor have I experienced some analogue of it.
In Europe it seems Pádel is all the craze.
For example, when the translation is shit and you prefer to use the English one because the one in your language is impossible to understand.
I'm very confused by the article. It's missing about two decades of modern non-cryptographic general hash development, it completely fails to mention the field of universal hashing which created formal criteria for collision probability and produced provably correct constructs to achieve those criteria...

As a self-plug for a related topic, I think going forward we should also take into account HashDoS for non-cryptographic hash functions. All of the hashes mentioned in the article are vulnerable to this, see https://orlp.net/blog/breaking-hash-functions/ for some techniques.
I hope this turns out to just be an anomaly, but I know that's likely not the case. The kicker is that global warming isn't even terribly hard to prevent, just give up your car and you've pretty much done your part.
it will be a good addition to search we will add it soon ( links and photos )
That's a nice name, but I'll have to sacrifice my Chinese pun.