skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Technically no, but Sony and Pocketpair have created a joint venture called Palworld Entertainment.

https://www.ign.com/articles/palworld-dev-signs-deal-with-so...
>In standard big-O you take as an assumption that memory operations are O(1)

No. If it look up big-O in a math book, it's not going to say anything about that. You can add assumptions on, but that's not big-O anymore, but something different. That's the point.
What is interesting or unique about honesty as a shared norm?

You are, again here, despite trying to deny it elsewhere in this thread, claiming the “anything goes” part within the bounds of the game and within the rules of the competition is somehow reflecting on the community norms and making this “interesting”.

It’s like trying to say “Oh wow it’s so interesting that marathon runners have their own ethics; they can just run as fast as they want as long as they don’t take shortcuts”.
What do you do after you OCR the pdfs?
Nintendo's been notoriously litigious since at least the 90s.
Hands-On with Vescin: MINI's New Vegan Friendly Interior That Replaces Leather
I will accept payment to be an expert mod for a bloomingkales reddit clone. just let me know when you need me and I'll let you know my bank account number for the transfer.
I don’t know if this works in general. But when I find it hallucinating around AWS SDK or CLI calls, I ask it to “verify AWS SDK functions from the documentation”. The paid version will do a web search and then it’s usually right. I will sometimes just give it a link to the page with the documentation on it
But we agree that heavier cars have more tire wear.

And EV cars tend to be heavier then comparable combustion cars.
There are at least several non-US jurisdictions in which voting is compulsory so the /idea/ that not voting is equivalent to some kind of problem at least is quite plausible.
China is #1 in annual emissions and is increasing every year and plans to continue increasing until at least 2030, is a larger annual emitter than all of Europe combined, and is #2 in total emissions since 1750. In fact, has released more than all of Europe combined since 1750.

Per capita is irrelevant. The thermodynamic system doesn't give a shit about how many people there are, all that matters is the amount of CO2. If you want to make some kind of moral argument you can't avoid asking the question of whether it's moral to have a kid at all. Unless you are prepared to consign your children to being a hunter gatherer until they die, they will add CO2 to the atmosphere.

Consider me and my neighbor, I am single and emit 1000 tons of carbon per year, he and his wife emit 3000 tons of carbon per year. They have triplets and increase their emissions by 500 tons per year. But somehow they are better than me now because on a per capita basis their house is only 700 tons per year per person while I'm still at 1000 tons per year? Sorry, I'm not reducing my lifestyle because they like to fuck.

If you want to measure a country or population by some metric other than total emissions, you should measure something like tons per quality of life or human development or something that demonstrates that the emissions are being used efficiently to increase overall human flourishing.
Libraries are great! And authors get paid for that too. Win-win.
Nintendo has been draconian since the 80s, this isn't anything new for them.
One has nothing to with the other.

That is the thing with committee driven languages, with multiple vendor implementations.

Not everyone is on the same room voting for the same features, and not everyone is implementing the features in any specific order.

By the way, I would rather have Safe C++ than profiles, but do not vote, so whatever.
Pretty sure he's sarcastically talking about trains existing
Seems like a good idea. I've signed up.

I did run into a 404 when trying to use the "Customize Channel" feature. And I also could have used a "preview" step before publishing so I could better understand what the channel-creation fields corresponded to before locking in a placeholder name.

Otherwise, it seems like a pretty straightforward proposition and a net positive, so thanks for building it!
It is a single party dictatorship, and you're already implying it:

>The original GOP...

Is not the current party in power. Hence why you're making that distinction - the party of 10 years ago doesn't matter anymore, it's irrelevant. If you believe that Trump getting a deadly heart attack tomorrow would bring the coup to a sudden end, I've got bad news for you.
That's why I come to hacker news.

I didn't mention where I'm from, so those are Canadian terms, at least Western Can terms maybe?

That dado rail is part of wainscoting, it's the top rail.

Thanks wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dado_rail
Ever see a diesel 'rolling coal'? They are burning the hydrogen and sending carbon into the air. Terrible for the local evironment though. this is still carbon positive though since some carbon is burned - just not all.
A narrow idea of what constitutes freedom ("an F-650 with a full gun rack", but not "guaranteed healthcare for everyone that needs it", or "freedom from having to deal with braindead morons with F-650s and rifles", or "public goods and walkable cities").

And you're spot on as regards China, and India as well. We've had a century or two to get rich off burning this stuff, they have not.
only if you file within the grace period. otherwise, you snooze, you loose
I consider a '60+ node' kubernetes cluster is very small. Kubernetes at that scale is genuinely excellent! At 6000, 60000, and 600000 nodes it becomes very different and goes from 'Hey, this is pretty great' to 'What have I done?' The maintenance costs of running more than a hundred clusters is incredibly nontrivial especially as a lot of folks end up taking something open-source and thinking they can definitely do a lot better (you can.... there's a lot of "but"s there though).
Arguably Canonical's hold on the community is much looser than Apple or even Microsoft. Because much of Ubuntu can be forked, much like RHEL was twice forked regardless of RedHat's wishes.

Mastodon servers too have a very loose hold on their communities.
You can have questions that are not urgent. It's like Cursor, I'm fine with the slow version until a certain point, I launch the request then I alt-tab to something else.

Yes it's slower, but well, for free (or cheap) it is acceptable.
Probably for electricity, but that doesn't represent the vast majority of fossil fuel use. Those are not yet abated.
>Trees are not seen as a solution because they don't represent a market opportunity. You can make millions selling EV's, how are you going to make money with trees?

Given that carbon is emitted continuously, and forests only offset a fixed amount of emissions (they stop sequestering carbon once they're fully grown and reach steady-state), you basically constantly need to be planting trees. That creates an obvious market for tree planting companies.
It's hard to imagine supply scaling with demand, or the tires providing as much grip and safety. I'm supportive, but I see no world where this is adopted.
Supercritical CO2, which behaves rather similar to a liquid, is also hydrophobic, which is why it is one of the best solvents for extracting oils from mixtures with water, being now preferred to older, gasoline-like solvents, which were hard to eliminate after extraction (if the pressure is reduced, supercritical CO2 evaporates from mixtures).
Sorry...it is: "The median author income for full-time authors from their books was $10,000 in 2022" - https://authorsguild.org/news/key-takeaways-from-2023-author...

"Nobody makes money from books" - https://malwarwick-98471.medium.com/nobody-makes-money-from-...

Exceptions and wildly successful authors are just the exceptions that confirm the status quo.
That's just one guy's opinion, namely:

> Richard Schmalensee, Howard W. Johnson Professor of Management Emeritus, Professor of Economics Emeritus, and Dean Emeritus of the MIT Sloan School of Management

An economics and b-school professor is not equipped to evaluate a multi-decade transition, and he apparently hasn't even taken into account how batteries are falling in cost like solar and wind are.

Those who do cost-optimal grid planning find that wind, solar, storage, our existing nuclear result in a grid that is cheaper than our current grid. However the problem is that we don't do grid planning based on what costs the least, we do small incremental changes from utilities that are using cost estimates that are years out of date, and we don't think about making large scale changes that result in big cost changes.

And one other thing about looking about predictions from the past with grid modeling, everybody always underestimated the rate of how fast solar and wind prices fall. They are doing the same for batteries now.
I think it's useful to think of the atmosphere as a battery, when we burn fossil fuels we discharge it gradually by taking O2 from the air and converting it to CO2 via the 'fuel'. You can extend this to an idea of there being a little parallel capacitor with the living biomass cycle on it, but it's okay to ignore for discussion.

We can't go on discharging it arbitrarily and leaving it there because that state is toxic to us.

This battery is insanely useful because it's all around us. Because most of the work is in the ambient O2 the 'fuel' we need use use this battery is incredibly dense. The miraculous density of it is because there is two parts to it, the density when you consider both is unimpressive (as anyone who has tried to operate a chainsaw inside a fire knows all too well, or run a ic motor underground), but because we can usually disregard the air side it is truly amazing.

It's so useful the all the higher life on earth also uses it, which is part of why discharging to much it is toxic to us.

Because it's so useful we're unlikely to completely stop using it unless we leave the planet. But that means we need to recharge it. The natural recharging mechanisms are only sufficient for surface biomass buffer, not the depths of the planets' oil and coal reserves which were changed over millennia using mechnisms that no longer exist (e.g. biomass trapped before microbes knew how to digest cellulose).

Unfortunately recharging it is probably going to take all the energy we got out of it and then somewhat more. It can only take less than that to the extent that we can find less enthalpic places to stash it that are as geophysically durable as the original forms. But that isn't so bad-- no one expects any battery to be 100% efficient, and one as useful as this one is worth some cost to use it.

But this also means that the proper price for long term fossil fuels is, shockingly, not the price that maximizes oil Barron incomes-- it's the price that covers the cost run run the recharging mechanism.

We don't have to make capture cheap, we just need it to be cheap enough that oil can be correctly priced.
Hmm, I've not really found that to be the case personally. Past that initial shit period up until my late teens, subsequent losses and grief has been quite different.
A wild, unsupported claim. And even if any particular author doesn’t make a full living out of writing, that doesn’t mean you’re hurting them by not paying.
You should disable PHP Warnings:

Reposted from /home/cyhaxztpeu/threadsky.app/post.php on line 1027

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /home/cyhaxztpeu/threadsky.app/post.php on line 1027

Deprecated: urlencode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/cyhaxztpeu/threadsky.app/post.php on line 1027

">
Warning: Undefined array key "author" in /home/cyhaxztpeu/threadsky.app/post.php on line 1028

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /home/cyhaxztpeu/threadsky.app/post.php on line 1028

Deprecated: htmlspecialchars(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/cyhaxztpeu/threadsky.app/post.php on line 1028

https://threadsky.app/post?uri=at%3A%2F%2Fdid%3Aplc%3Agtmiwo...
Bookshop.org is also highly political. It used to be that bookstores would be politically neutral and feature content of all kinds. Now those stores often put political content the employees want to support on the main shelves. Bookshop is the online version of that, and instead of being a bookstore they were doing things like getting involved in the BLM movement. This isn’t in the spirit of true bookstores in my opinion.
Every study I've seen concurs that EVs chew through tires faster than their equivalent ICE vehicle, and generate more tire particulate matter accordingly. The reasons (torque and weight) are unambiguously greater in an equivalent EV vs ICE.

EVs do generate lower brake particulate matter, by virtue of not using them as much (otherwise they'd also be prone to generating more in a (faulty) per-engagement direct comparison).

Could you link these studies?
You watch and enjoy the content that you like, find useful or otherwise enjoy instead of min-maxing your way to not supporting the platform or creators that are spending their time creating that content.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/crypto-in-trump-2-0-wi...
We (Start-up) publish high-quality blogs almost every day on our website, and some of them have received significant views, bringing real impact to our site. This strategy has proven to be an effective way to attract attention and engage potential users.
Rats have a higher reproduction cycle, so I wouldn’t count on us.
The Yale article and the paper both highlight the fact that EVs use regenerative braking and produce less dust.

I was worried that this was a rehash of the astroturf campaign from a few years ago focusing on EV weight and how that was so bad for the environment because of tire and road wear. Unfortunately you need to read through the whole thing (instead of the headline and a few paragraphs) to see that information.
>Hashtable analyses don't care how you get the hash function - it can take exactly 72 hours to arrive, but as long as the oracle satisifes some probability distribution guarantee, it's good. That is an O(1) operation, a single hash.

The problem is that, as n goes to infinity, you're not using the same hash function -- you can't. So even if you can assumed that one hash function has constant time, the later ones you need as you scale up wouldn't be.

And I don't know why you think you need to bring up probability distribution properties -- I made clear by now that the above points apply even to the mythic perfect hash function.

>Hopefully I've explained it better. Different models of computation are a fundamental part of theoretical computer science, since of course,

And it's fine to use different models! It's not fine to silently switch between them in an ad hoc way, which is what's necessary to make the exceptions that get you O(1) lookup for hashtables. I have never seen anyone expect the relevant caveats when quizzing coders for the correct answer on that question. That makes this part of computer science more like memorization or stamp collecting than a genuine mathematical model from which you consistently derive answers.
This is so cool idea. This is a very good example and probably give rise to many more ideas to build on the platform. I will have more feedback in the time to come if you can start a thread for that. Onward !!
> I think every run that claims to be RNG-edited should post RNG seed for verification

If I understood the later parts of the article right, that's now basically a standard or nobody believes you.
The study on which the article is based seems somewhat speculative.

The assumption for the full renewable scenario are the existence of the hydrogen economy. I'm quite positive about the potential of hydrogen but there are quite a few unsolved problems at the moment and it seems the hydrogen part of the energy transition has slowed down a bit.

Certainly the total cost of such a system is not well known at this time. So the cost calculation for the renewable scenario is quite uncertain - other energy storage tech might be more expensive.

The carbon capture calculation is based on the assumption that there is no other renewables and we go 100% capture.

This is not really that interesting an scenario, what matters more is the marginal costs of each technology at different points in the future.

In general a healthy dose of scepticism is warented when it comes to long term projections or cost of technologies, though or course policy does require we take a stab at it.
It seems truly absurd what you can patent nowadays. The system seems utterly broken for its original purpose which was to encourage ingenuity and inventiveness. It now does the exact opposite.
Same, I've heard it rarely used. Never heard coving before.
"Pro" pickleball is quite possibly the most boring sport I've ever seen. Hope to (deity of your choice) that this is a fad that dies out.

The game has already been optimized. It's tap-tap-tap and winner. There's very little room for tactical adjustments, no room whatsoever for different styles of play (unlike tennis). The ball doesn't move that quickly and apparently one isn't allowed to even hit sidespin on their serve.

The sport is quite literally jumbo ping pong for seniors who can't move without the speed or spin of ping pong. Somehow it's caught on to the masses. I don't get it. It's as if someone intentionally took the worst elements of every major racquet sport and turned it into a game.
So only point of this is for automation?
these days containers run well-known open source code or your own code, and are used widely in the field. Linux does have namespaces and other security approaches to safeguard them further. yes they are less secure than WASM but security is always a compromise between convenience and cost.

Anyway, points taken, thanks.
You can tell a lot about someone from their level of hatred for Musk (and Trump). In 50 years or so, future humans will look back at this phenomenon as one of insanity of our era.
Pretty much. I don't really see the problem though. You're also getting regular snapshots, which is yet another thing you have to build in that colo setup (and where are your backups going?). This is not for personal projects or shoestring-budget non-profits where you're willing to volunteer time, it's for businesses and decent paying work, where two hundred dollars is one man-hour of totally compensated labor.
Long story short, most people buying these are going in knowing its a game. There are some unwritten "norms", like the issuer doesn't "pull the rug" immediately. But they could and the norms sometimes get violated, as there are no real rules around it yet.
>I'm actually very curious now what led you to the line of thinking that it isn't possible?

The public domain is the set of all works in which no copyright subsists. Copyright automatically subsists in a work from its creation until it expires. Copyright is a property right. All property must have an owner.

Therefore a work cannot enter the public domain unless the copyright subsisting in it has expired.

(This is from the perspective of the law of England and Wales, at least. Other jurisdictions have similar legal axioms that produce the same result, though)
You can talk about the inefficiency of CC, but this is nonsensical. It's a woefully inefficient means to retrieve carbon in terms of cost. It only makes sense as a means, under development, to reduce prevent buildup in the atmosphere. If it does not do that very well, then as you can imagine, the yields are not great either! If it does do that well, then it's a moot point whether these companies profit; what matters is improving climate. Can't have it both ways.
Probably not. The way these lights are supposed to be operated is indeed always on. If you want to keep the old-school switch, you can put a smart relay behind it.
Responsible disclosure is not about rewards.

And I am not surprised some 16 years old doesn't care. I am more surprised HN ctowd doesn't seem to even mention it. 16 years old can learn, but only if there's a culture to teach them.
If the platform and creators are incentivized to waste my time, then why would I support that? I watch and enjoy the content even more knowing that I am not wasting my time.
Gift. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/14/technology/intel-tsmc-tal...
Aha! Doom noclip so you can run through walls.

(the first google result I got for idspispopd did not say _which_ cheat code it was, so figured I'd mention)
kind of like recycling
For me the reveal is the amount of space between the window casing/trim and the frame of the window.
Well, don't disable the warnings themselves but rather disable displaying them. They should of course still be logged.
“shaking the narrative”

What narrative? Their narrative?
Well that explains the line of reasoning pretty clearly.
Trump Media and Technology Group Corp
looong time ago - ~2005 maybe? - the late Pieter Hintjens told me about such overarching idea including whole project management and all related ping-pongs - code, data, documents, issues, e-mails, chats, everything - think like one laptop for this project and different one for that project - and that they had at the time approached something like that, and got it mostly working, over linux etc. But AFAIK it never went public and has been abandoned.

So the field is ripe for whoever wants to try... though now same accounts to XYZ are being used for hundred things..

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pieter_Hintjens
Replacement rate isn't an issue for countries with functional immigration paths. America can't choose to whine about unemployment and replacement rates while flying immigrants and asylum seekers back home on the taxpayer dollar.

Next time the minimum wage inevitably gets raised to an unsustainable level, thank the Republicans for getting rid of everyone that would work those lower-paying jobs. Simply birthing more idiots to work the cash registers is how America turns into a nation of drunkards and overpaid underachievers a-la the USSR. Even China knows they're worth more than that, and they're dealing with an actual population crisis.
Can’t you run larger models easily on MacBook Pro laptops with the bigger memory options? I think I read that people are getting 100 tokens a second on 70B models.
It’s also the reward of increased regulations on tailpipe emissions. We now have a new target to clean up. It’s not as if this is new, it just used to be we had lead fuel, poorly burned fuel, tire dust, asbestos in brakes, and many other problematic forms of pollution. We’re just going down the list.

Also, what you’re looking at is an overweighted responsibility on people/consumers to own the solutions to pollution. No matter what car you buy today it is emitting less pollution than ten, twenty, and especially thirty to fifty years ago. Meanwhile we still burn bunker oil (the leftovers from petroleum distillation) in shipping. It’s as if we swore off doing anything better for the planet if it inconveniences a large company.

https://harvardpolitics.com/climate-change-responsibility/
"US President Donald Trump posted high losses with his Truth Social network in 2024 amid falling revenue. According to the annual report of the Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG), the net loss last year amounted to around 401 million US dollars. This was offset by revenue of only 3.6 million US dollars. This represents a decrease of twelve percent compared to the previous year."

https://www.golem.de/news/trump-media-nur-3-6-millionen-doll...

Translation by DeepL