skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The bit about non-catastrophizing the condition reminds me of raising children. Often when toddlers fall they will look to the adults in the room for how to react to their fall. If they receive a chorus of "Oh, you poor thing, did you fall? Did you hurt yourself?" and such, they'll start crying and looking for sympathy. But if they get reactions like "Oh, come on and get up, you're fine" they're likely to just get up and get on with their day. Of course, parents should only do this when the little falls on a carpet, kitchen floor, or back lawn. If knees are skinned or you've fallen into a pile of Duplo, it's okay to hurt a little.
IdentityServer4 wiped from GitHub by Duende team
The Verge on this:

https://www.theverge.com/news/614883/humane-ai-hp-acquisitio...

> After the shutdown, offline features like “battery level” will still work, Humane says, but “any function that requires cloud connectivity like voice interactions, AI responses, and .Center access” will not.

I'd really like to know if the Humane PR flack typed that with a straight face.
Even if your entire stack is TS, you still need validation because the submitted data from an external interface (API call) might not be valid.

You can't just accept any JSON payload and expect it to be valid.

In Java or .NET, it will fail at serialization when the runtime tries to map it to a static type (automatic). This is not the case at runtime with JS (because at runtime, it's no longer TS). Thus you need a Zod or a Valibot to ensure the incoming payload is actually valid by describing the valid types (even if your whole stack is TS at dev time because schema mismatches are a runtime problem).

.NETs System.Text.Json does the mapping and validation using either reflection or AOT generated serializers transparently and automatically because it has static types.
One year is not a trend, especially because there are only a few events per year.
This comment is about a very minor part of what you said, but isn’t the whole point of a DI framework to write code you’d have written anyway to save you time?
> I've tested all of ours on each of the main models

Could you list them? I've noticed even quite techy people seem to be critically behind on what has happened in the last few months.
Eh, I'd defer to them over some rando on the internet who's only seen a video that shows a short snippet of what went on.

The best anyone here can do is screech about not following the default suggested practice of leaving the luggage but the person who took the bag was actually there. Perhaps they had to pick it up because it was on the floor (ceiling) in their way. Not much harm in carrying it if it's something that small anyway.
3.5 Sonnet Yes IC SWE (Diamond) N/A 26.2% $58k / $236k 24.5%

But sonnet solved over 25% of them and made 60 grand.

That's a substantial amount of work. I don't entirely disagree with you about it being premature but these things are clearly providing substantial value.
That's a good point. Assuming they're strategic about releasing this benchmark, they likely already evaluated o3 on it and saw that it performs favorably. Perhaps they're now holding off until they have a chance to tune it further, and then release a strong improvement and get additional buzz a bit later on.
Handing it to the CCP is OK then?
Because almost all AAA games are built using in-house engines.
That’s its stated purpose, yes, but given whose mouth those statements have come out of, I’m pretty skeptical that that’s going to be the actual outcome.

Totally willing to be proven wrong, we’ll see.
For sure. It can be challenging to inculcate a culture of treating docs as a product, but since great docs can drive revenue growth and bad docs can increase churn, it's a very important mindset.

In terms of creating guides/examples for third-party tools, do you have a particular use-case in mind? e.g. if you're something like Zapier with hundreds of connections?
I am increasingly concerned that these new reasoning models are thinking.
All those surveillance programs are a threat to everyone who wants to keep the technology he and his company develops.

There is nothing preventing programs of that sort being used for industrial espionage.
I'd definitely be more interested in seeing the storyboard than the AI generated movie. I guess that says something about how I/we value of AI generated content
I think Sonnet doesn't have web search integrated, and I suspect because of this I receive more hallucinated lib APIs compared to gpt.
Okay, that's your opinion to have. Meanwhile, reality is based on reputation and contracts are lost over behavior all the time. The original form of "politically correct" was an etiquette meant to minimize those odds of losses due to bad PR.

I do think the opinion of this clashes with your stance on not wanting to buy "communist" country products though.
ChatGPT can!
It's a very flawed test.

> We sourced real tasks that were previously solved by paid contributors.

It seems possible/likely the answers would in the training data (time dependant, maybe some were answered post training, but pre benchmark).
A notebook is how you compensate for hitting the limit of working memory, and everyone can easily hit their limit. This is especially the case in software, where it is trivial to write code thats inter-leavings cause working memory overflow. That’s why good abstractions are so crucial; the human brain has a teeny tiny stack.

That’s not what this is about though, it’d still be nice if possible, to increase the stack size. The following is a link to “Simple Made Easy”, by Rich Hickey; which is the best talk I’ve ever seen on complexity in software and how to manage it. https://youtu.be/SxdOUGdseq4?feature=shared
My use of python is somewhat recent. But the two languages that I have used a lot of - Java and JS - have interpreters that were heavily optimized over time. I wonder why that never happened with python and, instead, everyone continues to write their critical code in C/Rust.

I am planning to shift some of my stuff to pypy (so a "fast" python exists, kind of). But some dependencies can be problematic, I have heard.
That feels pretty similar to my story. I always put it down to some kind of puberty changes.
"Battery levels are fine. Jump on in!"
As much as I dislike the US' militaristic identity and especially its foreign policy, and would like nothing more than to slash the military budget in half and use it for something beneficial, when it comes to the economic benefits of the military-industrial complex, you're absolutely right.
At least according to Meta's marketing, WhatsApp is E2E encrypted. And they make ads just for this -- you can literally see billboards in NYC that advertises the encrypted messaging part of the product. It would completely destroy WhatsApp and Meta's brand if there is a backdoor somewhere. Well, Meta is never a great company to begin with, but nobody would ever lie about it and destroy their brand this way.

And I truly believe Meta has an incentive to do so. They had to reveal a conversation on Facebook Messenger on the topic of abortion after the police asked for it, which resulted in someone put in jail. Regardless of Meta's (or rather Zuck's) ever changing political position, they don't want to have liability over anything like this. They want to walk away and just say to the cops, look it's all encrypted, there's nothing we can share with you.

Better keep conspiracy theories to yourself. It's ok to question things, but better back that up with evidence.
Me too. Loved playing it and I'm sad
Nobody’s proposing to build rail in flyover country, but there are many places where high speed rail make sense based on GDP and population density (CAHSR, DC-NYC-Boston maglev, DFW-Houston)
Boeing builds SLS to NASA's specs. They're a contractor; Boeing has no other use for the rocket.

Starship is a very different scenario; SpaceX fully intends for it to serve their own purposes as well.
the latter - the fact this product had any traction leading to this is a result of marketing almost entirely.
Rather poetically, this C software in 2025 segfaults on launch. I would file a GitHub issue if this was open source, but alas, nope.
Instead of trying to put words in my mouth, let me just say what I think:

I believe software patents are no more legal in the US than they are in the EU, and this is based on SCOTUS precedent in the US that makes the legal argument for software patents very sketchy. In a just world, that would mean that pretty much all of the MPEG-LA's patent portfolio should be worthless. But I suspect that in both the US and the EU, the fig leaf of "but I didn't patent the software algorithm, I patented the hardware running the software algorithm" is sufficient to get it granted and survive scrutiny to get it invalidated.

I don't have the time to look up the court case history of the EU--and I know that the EU is a civil law jurisdiction so the court case history isn't precedential in the same way it is in the US--but I would not be shocked if there have been cases that have upheld these software patents, despite the seemingly clear language in the treaties that software patents don't exist. Because the legal field is one wherein the "obvious" definition of software patent isn't necessarily the same as the legal definition.

The reality is that MPEG-LA positively asserts that it has a buttload of EU patents it can sic on your ass for violating, and were I being sued by them, I wouldn't be willing to bet that "but software patents are illegal!" is a winning defense.
Oh wow I totally missed that angle. In that respect the marketing was genius.
Thus missing my point entirely.

The same thing that happened to all those farmers will happen to us.
Firstly, Bytedance is far more than just Tiktok.

Secondly, most data in China is shared among most companies anyway, because, firstly, the government (not necessarily CCP) orders most companies to share data with "technological leaders" and "strategically important" companies, and secondly because computer security is mostly an alien concept to Chinese.

Copyright (broadly speaking, most restrictions on unrestricted dissemination if data) is what is killing the US economy.
>Someone quoted a figure for electric car maintenance, as a downside to the technology.

It is a downside compared to ICE maintenance which is significantly lower.

>Life is full of trade-offs: if I did that, I'd have to carry a loan

to which I replied there are plenty of cars sub 10K which you wouldnt need a loan for and that you could easily maintain for less than 1000/year

>I remarked that this actually sounded pretty good, relative to my experience with ICE cars

When I broke down the cost of the maintenance items YOU listed as over 1000/year over 10 years I said that those items you listed dont need maintenance every year, and the cost of replacing them is far less than 1000 dollars a year. To which you replied that I was nitpicking

> Then you came along with a chip on your shoulder and started griping, for reasons known only to yourself.

Im not griping I am just telling you that you are wrong when you say that 13k/10 years is cheaper than the maintenance items you listed. Just like the other guy said.

Then again you own a jeep and you know what they say about jeep: Just Empty Every Pocket :P
Yes .NET's built in SDK is larger than Node.JS's. I'm not sure what your point is exactly. As you stated just use a validation library if that's necessary. It generally is not though, you can cast the entire output to a type in TypeScript, of course this isn't validation, but it's generally good enough.

Of course if you’re writing a full stack app you can share everything, validating the front and backend with the same code. Clearly that would be a strange thing to hold against .net, similar to the lack of built in validation in typescript.
There's quite a lot of information given out on engine programming and 'tricks' at GDC every year. Some great talks by Unreal, Bungie, Guerrilla Games, etc...
How does it help and not make it worse when it comes to layoffs?
For reference, this post prompted a lot of discussion on lobste.rs: https://lobste.rs/s/f5ziu7/comments_on_shared_unix_hosting_v...
Why not have a flow that automatically adds/updates stuff to the PR itself?
I think "travels with" is an odd phrasing that distracts from the meaning of the sentence. It took me a while to parse as well.
I must admit I was a little surprised when I first realised this to be true. It's rather unnerving to discover that the most intelligent part of your mind is operating without you knowing about it.
https://archive.md/r08q6
Toyota to support Michigan EV battery plant with $1.5B order after GM backs out
Until you finish highschool teachers and school staff are your jailers not to put too fine a point on it… so that doesn’t exactly foster empathy.

Being friends with educators as an adult has made me a lot more sympathetic to school teachers than my own public school experience ever did. College helped too
Hopefully it will also improve the product design engineering quality at HP. While the AI pin is a bit useless the industrial product design is at a high level. From what I remember it’s mostly an core of Apple engineers
The problem is that in most engineering discussions "big tech does this" is instant discussion win, while a solution that deviates from what coworkers perceive as "standard" will never get accepted, even if you use logical arguments.

I mean, if I'm doing a project with one other person, we can use logic to get to the best solution, but if it's three people in a group or more, then the most charismatic person becomes the leader, and the rest does whatever the leader wants, even if they make bad calls.
People who interact with the public and work for BigCo routinely bark orders that are non-optimal for the customers individually but convenient for the company.

Customers have been trained to stop and think twice when someone tells them what to do. That's just the reality of the world we live in.
> people who might do that and are paying sufficient attention to this are still reeling

What are they doing?
That's exactly my point. These glasses affect more than just the wearer. Wearing these glasses exposes others.

I see the argument in public (thought I'm uncomfortable with that as well), but this affects other situations too. I'm not going to ask my blind friend to remove his accessibility device when he enters my home, but the same can't be true of my business. Can't have protected personal, health, financial, or corporate information delivered directly to Meta.

That's probably the crux of it. These aren't just vision aids, they're cloud-centric data-harvesting Meta products.

So I'm not arguing against the tech, but I am expressing discomfort. If I knew someone who wore these, even as an accessibility aid, I'd feel uncomfortable around them.
sounds fair, fuck that guy
You cited this reference up thread: "The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age". It should give you pause for your definition of heritability that this paper is saying it changes with age. As you point out a couple of comments later, genes don't change with age.

If you're going to cite heritability numbers, you have to use the technical definition of heritability (which is what these papers are using).

> Is this not what heritability means?

No, not at all.
You can run NextDNS on your router to solve this.
I really wish there was an open version of these.... being all to work with chatgpt advance or send pics to Gemini would be killer for me.
Yes, and there is also no protection of who communicates with whom, which is basically the most important thing of all.
Can someone explain a non-project based workflow/configuration for uv? I get creating a bespoke folder, repo, and uv venv for certain long-lived projects (like creating different apps?).

But most of my work, since I adopted conda 7ish years ago, involves using the same ML environment across any number of folders or even throw-away notebooks on the desktop, for instance. I’ll create the environment and sometimes add new packages, but rarely update it, unless I feel like a spring cleaning. And I like knowing that I have the same environment across all my machines, so I don’t have to think about if I’m running the same script or notebook on a different machine today.

The idea of a new environment for each of my related “projects” just doesn’t make sense to me. But, I’m open to learning a new workflow.

Addition: I don’t run other’s code, like pretrained models built with specific package requirements.
Coming soon to your next printer: navigate through menus with a pico projector sending dim light onto your outstretched palm...
FDA falls under the Department of Health and Human Services. So you can see where the overlap is.

I don't know the exact reasoning for the structuring, but FDA contains the office of neurological and physical medicine devices. So thats the part impacted here.
NATS

https://docs.nats.io/nats-concepts/overview/compare-nats
Not sure. The simplest solution is to store all files under a hashed name and sym/hardlink on a case to case basis. But some applications tend to behave weirdly with such files. Windows has its own implementation of symlinks and hardlinks. They simply call it something else. Perhaps portability could be an issue.
Sure, but that inequality of meaning would have to lead to a 'Therefore I conclude this specific, highly infeasible, self-contradictory secret exists' - which is perhaps a common problem with arguments for religion.

I'm confident there's fairly mundane multi-generational secrets, without having to summon the illuminati or knights templar. Either way it doesn't negate the interest in having a technology that could provide that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ntPxdWAWq8

:%s/Cloud/AI/g
>Airlines are in the business of delivering the worst customer service they can get away with

The DMV is pure customer service.

Airlines are "applied" customer service since they actually deliver a service there is demand for.
Shit headline. This is referring to lifetime costs, and the article mentions:

>This increase is in part due to the extension of the service life of the aircraft from 2077 in 2018 to 2088 in 2023.

Many of the ongoing operational costs have been declining, but on the flip side there have been a lot of delays in modernization programs.
It's zeolite folks, and the paragraph lower which acknowledges high temp furnace remains the only way at scale to deal with things, pending some improvements in catalysis.

So its a very long article about ion exchange, filter at source and .. zeolyte.
Anything and everything depends on the threat model. Often, a popular and trusted VPN is the first and necessary step to hide in the crowd and drop your most logged geo ID, which is the endpoint IP.

Additional measures are certainly required.
Heeyy morning Jeff! Looks like we are still low on yellow ink today, so I'm probably not going to be able print anything for you. But if you'd like I could order a new cartridge set direct from HP? Would you like me to go ahead with that order or remind you in 15 minutes with another friendly greeting?

If you like I could call you on your cell to remind you, send you a text, email you, or I could just shout loudly from right here in printer!
You are effectively paying $3500 for a car. If you want a new car now you have to pay for it, probably more than $3500 I'm guessing, and it too will amount to a gamble of what else is lurking around the corner just with a different car.
There is a risk, but I think you're overstating it

I think the shared hosting companies have issues because of customers who host "grayware" and the like, although I'd probably agree they don't have enough security for a critical business like a bank or health care organization

(I don't know much about their internals, but I know the Dreamhost has grsec-hardened kernels)

IMHO If you share computing with random other people you want AT LEAST Intel VT/AMD-V virtualization for isolation.

I think you can probably do this with Firecracker VMs. That is, preserve the shared hosting model, but have all the protections that VMs have.

It might be possible to plug in firecracker purely through config, or make a slight patch to sshd.

sshd already has support for ChrootDirectory, which is conceptually the same, but just a weaker form of isolation:

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/542440/how-does-chr...

And then for a web process, you can mount some disk and a connection to a database into a Firecracker VM, etc.
Not only that, but 2,6,7 is also a set but not included in the results
Yes, because in the scenarios where a SPA is appropriate, round-tripping on every state change is terrible UX.
I wonder how these results would change if working memory was augmented, e.g. by giving participants a notepad.
There are so many more cost-effective grid-scale options like pumped storage. I think it's daft to "waste" the energy density of lithium batteries on stationary applications.
And ruin the benchmark? Come on, bro.
Second avenue subway in NYC for over 1b/mi

CAHSR for ~100b

A completely useless underground palace at grand central for 11b

Really can’t build shit in this country without getting shaken down by unions, nimbys, lawyers, and consultants
Meta announces LlamaCon, its first generative AI dev conference on April 29
Because ghuntly doesn't have to outrun the bear, just outrun the rest of us.

Meaning, if ghuntly can provide more value to an employer than a different employee, who doesn't know this trick, it's the other employee that's getting laid off, not ghuntly. In sharing this trick, it means that ghuntly now also has to outperform the other employee who also has this trick.
> > What you said was a sloppily-worded over-confident claim that is plainly not true, and only vaguely resembles a claim that might be proven true in the future.

> You are saying already, that my untested hypothesis is not true. Yet you say it my be proven true in the future?

Your reading is as sloppy as your writing apparently. Read the bit you quoted: it does not say what you're saying it does.

> On now, I noticed this is of some interest to you when I found this on your website: https://files.kerkeslager.com/pdf/AntidepressantFoods.pdf

> You know, that view is well outside of the mainstream and has zero scientific evidence. If I went to my PDoc she could not prescribe me food.

I have made exactly no claims about the validity of that paper. All I did was put it on my website. And I have to say, it's a bit creepy that you went and started researching me to try to win an argument. You gonna start trying to figure out where I live next?

I think that paper is interesting, and I hope it gets researched more, but I definitely do not think it should be mainstream medicine without further research. I never made that claim--that's purely your straw man hallucination. That's it. That's all I'm willing to say on this, because I'm not a doctor and I don't make up quack medical advice like you do.

> Weird. I never said that. Being someone who attempted suicide twice myself I do not think that is a good idea.

You did say that, actually. You said, "[I]f people have mood disorders they should see an immunologist first".

If you don't think it's a good idea, you should not have said it.

The rest of your post is just unhinged insults which I won't respond to--I responded to your post knowing you wouldn't like what I had to say, so it should be pretty clear that I don't care what you think of me.
python just didn't have much momentum until relatively recently, despite it's age. There are efforts to speed it up going on now backed by Microsoft.

For pypy it's in a weird spot as the things it does fast are the ones you'd usually just offload to a module implemented in C
Deep Lake: A Lakehouse for Deep Learning
Fast Video Generation with Sliding Tile Attention
Sliding tile attention accelerates Hunyuan video generation by 3x with no quality drop and no need for training
I used uv for the first time a few months ago and it was a total revelation (previously I used venv and pip). I would be happy if pip itself and conda went away (although that won't happen).