skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If the features were actually cut, then that would be a separate discussion point. However, that was not the case, the author directly says that the features are still there but restricted to blessed set of users. So, author considers elm to be crippleware
But how much did the o3 runs cost?
Not quite. Carter put his farm into a blind trust during his administration; when he left office, he sold the farm because it was deeply unprofitable (and had been mismanaged by his chosen trustee).
It’s kind of trivially true right? The problem is we are on a path to have a shitload of carbon in the atmosphere so we better figure out how to get it out starting now
It's exhausting. Each side of every argument is full of misinformation, intentionally or not.
The "Repo" link on the very first screen would have brought you to the repo with both the CSS and SCSS.
A massive investment in Solar/Wind produced Hydrogen for export got canned in Australia. The JV needed $1b+ of additional state funding and got nothing so they walked. Admittedly it was heading to 2 or 3 times more expense building out the train than they'd said, but thats probably not unusual in civil construction.

I believe another plant in South Australia is still going ahead. And possibly one in Victoria.

I am a bit of a skeptic over the value chain here. I get that Ammonia is both feedstock for other things, and a safe(r) transport form to get it around the world and I do now believe there's a potential sustained market, if Japan still backs fuel-cell motors. But, I don't see this as a locked in thing. You would think that a world centered on Oil would look for another energy source amenable to retrofit into their design tech and from what I understand Ammonia to H2 Gas to direct industrial applications isn't a bad journey. Piping H2 where you had LNG is (I read) a horrible journey because it's more motile, the seals adequacy for Hydrogen doesn't mean LNG distribution systems "just work"
Cheers Ali, what is the physician staffing company called?
You migrate relevant parts of that diff into your workdir, test and commit.

Is it that hard? What is this question even? Do you lose consciousness and project awareness in these cases? Why someone must split all the work before it's needed, when it's only needed in 0.01% of all cases? Why wouldn't you do this job when the need to rollback arises? Good arguments for commit granularity exist, but this one makes little sense, like many others.
A for-profit media company that foreign interests can pile money into for a quid pro quo, that’s somehow not legally a quid pro quo anymore.
Uchū ni mchū

Mada mada tochū

Shiritai koto ga afureru

Nande darō tte omou nara

Sa, sagashi ni yukō!
I lost my hairline and let the beard grow. Thankful I got that, haha!
Uber and Lyft are both public and profitable, now. The drivers also pay taxes on their earnings.
> Another reason people (e.g., my mother in law) buy kindles is that the price of ebooks is very often much less from Amazon than from the Kobo store.

Note that Kobo will price match plus credit 10% of the difference. It’s pretty quick and I’ve never had one of my requests denied.
TIL about oklch()

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/color_value...
"It's said that the honest man has nothing to hide. Not true. The honest man has to hide himself, because honest men are the prime targets of those who lie."
It was posted in the comments that ISO 8601, at one point, mentioned 1875-05-20 as a reference date. According to Wikipedia, it was later omitted[0]. I guess it's possible that the social security system (EDIT: that we know today) was initially designed with that date as a sort of epoch. Either way, it seems nuanced and no one has the full story (including Elon)

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
That's not a bad idea, I've done something similar on other sites I've built before. The landing doesn't need to be 100vh.
that would require an algebraic solver which is definitely possible but more complex than really warranted for a "basic" calculator
PGA players are about 75% white. That’s not far off from the US population.
Because it means having to give up control and accept that other people are going to contribute - even when they don't follow your own long-term vision.

The Elm Vision is that every library should be infinitely powerful, trivial for novices to learn, and written 100% in Elm. Any deviation from this is seen as a failure of the entire Elm project and a personal embarrassment. The problem is that these standards are way too high and essentially impossible to achieve for any nontrivial library.

The biggest risk of letting other people step is that they may succeed. They're going to write code which is incredibly useful to a lot of people, and it's going to become popular. But those developers aren't strictly following the Elm Vision. They are pragmatic, and they are willing to cut some corners in order to actually ship something. This of course leads to difficult questions like "It works great in library XYZ, why don't we just adopt that in Core Elm?". But you can't, because it breaks your Elm Vision, and you don't have infinite time and money to reinvent the wheel for dozens of core web features until it is 100% perfect according to your Vision. You're rapidly losing grip, and people start talking about a fork.

Elm is becoming a success, but your Elm Vision is rapidly degrading and at risk of failing completely. You can't let them fork. You must maintain control. Your Vision must survive, and it's the only way. You've spent so much time and effort on this. You can't let it fail. It's your life's work. You don't want all that effort to go to waste. You don't want to be a failure. We just have to make sure everyone understands the Vision, and everything will work out okay. We just have to properly educate the dissenters and all will be fine.

---

I don't live in Evan's head, so I'm not going to claim this is his train of thought. But if you're looking for a reason not to let other people step in, here's one possible explanation for you.
This is clearly a disagreement about weights. You don't seem to weigh empathy and joy very highly in comparison to violence. How much kind empathetic deeds do you think it takes to outweigh 10 minutes of violent murder? A hug? A romance? A lifetime of Love? One hundred lifetimes of kindness?

Sometimes it helps to make the context personal? How much violence would you endure for a year of kindness and love?
If there wasn't enough gold in London, wouldn't that mean that gold claims there would be more valuable, not less? Because in order to fulfill the delivery they will have to repurchase the gold, creating huge demand.
This is not consensus.

Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell has a very good video on it:

Did The Future Already Happen? - The Paradox of Time

https://youtu.be/wwSzpaTHyS8

"To be honest, no one knows. What we’ve learned are two possibilities to describe time, but they're not the only ones. Some scientists think that the idea of “now” only makes sense near you, but not in the universe as a whole. Others think that time itself doesn’t even exist – that the whole concept is an illusion of our human mind. And others think that time does exist, but that it's not a fundamental feature of the universe – rather, time may be something that emerges from a deeper level of reality, just like heat emerges from the motion of individual molecules or life emerges from the interactions of lifeless proteins."

They touch on block universe:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternalism_(philosophy_of_time...

…and growing block universe:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternalism_(philosophy_of_time...

"The growing block universe, or the growing block view, is a theory of time arguing that the past and present both exist, and the future as yet does not. The present is an objective property, to be compared with a moving spotlight."

Excellent video worth your time.
I find the stack exchange interesting, but I still think its post-hoc reasoning. I would prefer one of the people who worked on these systems to say it, than have a plausible, but none-the-less third hand take published as "the answer"
Ordinary currencies have value due to the enormous debt in it.

If people fail to obtain units of the currency, they default on obligations that have much greater value than the value of the all the cash in the currency. Thus in an ordinary currency the incentive isn't to ignore it, or to sell, but to hoard it so that people can't obtain the money to pay their loans in order to create a crisis so that they can obtain a large fraction of the value of collateral.

This is prevented by central banks. If you try to execute this corner, you will drive up prices, so they will start printing money.

So Bitcoin and Ethereum, both remain memes. Fiat currencies have non-mem value due to the debt.
I learned about it from https://evilmartians.com/chronicles/oklch-in-css-why-quit-rg...

And when I tried it out for myself I was amazed at the color boost. That's when I decided to create a theme!
The swarms of tourists haven't got to them... yet.
Cool. I think I can get my work to pay if I can get an API too.
It is difficult to take this person seriously regarding privacy when the call to action regarding protecting one's privacy is:

Subscribe and stay in touch. I have the most awesome
community over on Instagram, and I’m really excited to have
a community here, too.
Yet they are paying for it already and now they get to pay again.
I don't think China wants chaos per se. I don't think either China or Russia want a situation where any given state can just decide to invade another state and move borders.

What you described as a "new world order" is a return to spheres of influence. The regional hegemon usually wants some degree of stability within their sphere. The whole imperial project is impeded when your subjects are fighting each other.

I think it is true that both Russia and China are open to limited chaos now, but not as a constant on-going feature. Chaos now is just a symptom of the current system in terminal decline. I can imagine all major powers of a new system using the relative stability of the new system as a legitimizing point (aimed both at domestic consumption, as well as to their subject states).

Finally, I think describing "what the US wants" right now is basically impossible. Even before Trump, there has always been (and especially in the last ~20 years) this ever growing chasm between the reality of soft empire, and "what the man on the street" believes and thinks about the reality of American power and its benefits and costs.
Well, that's just not true:

$ ip -4 addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

$ ping -6 ipv4.google.com
PING ipv4.google.com(sof04s06-in-f14.1e100.net (64:ff9b::142.251.140.78)) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 64:ff9b::8efb:8c4e: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=27.9 ms

This is a v6-only machine (no v4 address other than lo), talking to a v4-only hostname. If it was truly not possible to communicate, this wouldn't work.

> If everything in the IPv6 protocol suite was literally identical to IPv4, but just with some extra bytes in every address, because they are not mutually compatible.

This part is true though. v6 is backwards compatible in rather a lot of ways, but v4 isn't forwards compatible, and it's important to note that this comes entirely from the larger address size -- no amount of making v6 more identical to v4 than it already is would make v4 any more compatible with it, unless you undermined the entire point and made the addresses 32 bits.
I would assume it's to prevent buying accounts in locations with cheaper pricing due to local affordability and using them internationally. A Turkish or African continent country would be a significantly cheaper subscription price than say Singapore or Switzerland.
Syndeo: Secure, Portable Ray Clusters
High-performance computing (HPC) remains a critical enabler of modern AI research, yet the divergence between cloud-based and on-premises infrastructure has created a challenge for researchers and engineers. On one hand, cloud computing offers scalability and convenience, but at a significantly higher cost. On the other hand, on-premises clusters, often managed with Slurm, provide cost efficiency and control but lack seamless compatibility with modern AI-centric cloud tools like Ray. This is where Syndeo comes in.

Syndeo is an open-source software framework that allows developers to run Ray clusters on Slurm and other HPC environments with secure containerization. The goal is simple: write code once, deploy anywhere. By bridging the gap between cloud and on-premises compute, Syndeo enables researchers to leverage the best of both worlds.
I'd say he's trying to pick a fight by saying such inflammatory things.

The Kiel Institute divides aid into three categories: military, financial, humanitarian. By the end of 2024, Europe and the US had delivered roughly the same amount of military aid, and Europe had committed to a lot more in the future:

US Europe
Delivered 64 62
Committed 66 100
Total 130 162

Deliveries of military aid from both sides closely followed the same growth line throughout 2024. In some months, the US was ahead in total delivered military aid; in others, Europe was. See Figure 1 at https://www.ifw-kiel.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/Subject_Do...

The second largest category was financial aid, which is also vital for the war effort, because much of it has been provided for rebuilding destroyed infrastructure and ensuring resilience against further attacks:

US Europe
Delivered 47 57
Committed 50 131
Total 97 188

Humanitarian aid was fairly insignificant compared to other categories:

US Europe
Delivered 3 16
Committed 13 13
Total 16 29

All figures in Euros, rounded to the nearest billion.
"It's insulting no matter how you look at it, either paternalistic or white supremecist"

I'm puking in my mouth a little.

Pretty clear we know you fall on this issue. I read a good post today: Don't try to explain Kendrick Lamar to someone Harriet Tubman would shoot.

e: I create a new account for each post because I value privacy, and not fake internet points.
Really? The cloud servers I use have networking stacks, drivers for various block storage devices, drivers for character-oriented devices (terminals), maybe GPU drivers.

Running in the cloud means the hardware got virtualized, not that it went away from the OS point of view. A Linux cloud server appears to have disk drives and ethernet cards.
So my comment then wasn’t directed to you. It was directed to those with more extreme views on what DEI means and to those reading. Apologies for casting too wide a net.
> things will tend to become more disordered over time, because there are just more ways to be disordered than ordered.

Isn't this a bit underspecified? Like a marble in a bowl has plenty of positions it can be in, but it tends to end up in the center due to the whole physical system doing its thing to roll a marble to the center.

Or is there some deeper argument here?
I've pretty much always kept my phone on silent. I don't mind notifications while I'm on my phone anyways, but if I do manage not to check on it for a while I see that as a good thing.
Wisdom section
You have to deal with the AirTrain (which isn't free) at JFK. The Tube actually has a Heathrow station, and the RER goes directly to CDG. It's even easier to get to Gatwick than JFK.
Can you give us a misinformation example related to this post. This sounds like an empty complaint with no vector.
It is still a problem if you want caddy to run outside of docker (e.g. for getting real remote addr).
>Regular investors want to maximize returns

It's a good point, and what you're really underscoring here gets to the heart of my comment—that is, the "creative/disruptive" solutions I referenced will require a re-think of everything, including the current "get investors who expect infinite returns" model. Likewise, expanding our thinking beyond wealthy donors being the only other alternative.

So, for instance, crowd-fundable or lower capex businesses may need to be prioritized. There are many other creative avenues waiting to be discovered.

Because, I agree that it's hard to see how you can keep all of these elements of the current model (and baseline assumptions) in place and expect a different outcome.

So, once you pull the thread of disruption, it'll unwind a lot more that needs to be addressed/solved. But, I believe it would be worth the pull.
The blog is terrible. I've browsed a few articles in case the one linked was a misunderstanding, but the "whys" in the titles never get answered, and there is no information actually shared in there, only rants and general truths "advertisers use your data", with very little research into the actual data or the articles' titles themselves.
Meanwhile adding science fiction things like mobile IP.
I didn't know this technique existed at all, but it's really cool. Anyone have a good explanation?

Here is one that I found: https://scaniverse.com/news/intro-gaussian-splats

Seems to me like it's a way to capture a bunch of 2D pictures of a scene, but instead of turning them into meshes, you position them in a 3D point cloud but then use algorithms to calculate their position, angle, field of view, etc. and them seamlessly blend them together with other nearby pictures to create the illusion of depth. Is that right?
> Honestly, I really struggle to understand the mindset that’s not merely okay with but excited by this sort of egregious corruption.

Seems like it should be easy to do. We're looking at this big corrupt blob thing of questionable competence that is the US political class, and then one polyp of the mass does something that probably makes the world a little better. Yay. Well done blob thing.

It'd be better if people committed to a high-integrity political class but it is a monumental task (probably multi-generational) and the people trying to progress it haven't made much progress. Suggestions welcome.
> Another interpretation would be that as time moves forward and backwards the state of the universe is free to change

What would be the measurable effect of this - would casualty actually be broken? Would we get Dejavu?
Oh sorry, this way the creator of the underlying infrastructure can collect rent from all aforementioned re-implementations of existing services.
Bill Nye isn't a scientist.

Einstein moved to the US well after he became a famous scientist. The University of Zurich, where he got his degree, has been open to women since the mid 19th century.

The Ivy League first started admitting women in 1870 (Cornell). The rest, however, were far later.
I do not understand your logic. Imagine I have 1 gold bar and issued 100 paper claims on it. How would one claim worth more than one physical gold bar? After someone retrieves the bar, I will have zero gold bars and 99 claims. Would you buy such claim knowing that I do not have any gold in my vault?

It may not be even an outright scam. Those 99 claims may be backed by claims on someone else's gold, but it's likely I will not be able to exercise those claims in a timely manner, making me insolvent. Thus we have a "bank run" situation.
For contrast, do you mean the swatch portions? If so, the smaller color values are there more for visual than information because the repo has the values in readable form. I wouldn't want to read light orange on orange for more than a paragraph, for example.
Live power outage data is intentionally obscured by power providers as a matter of public safety. They report outages, and numbers of affected customers, etc. But efforts are made to ensure the locations of those customers cannot be too easily weaponized. It remains a question how effective those efforts are.
Missing word: "Illegal" access.

Henchmen violating privacy laws is just as illegal as of they were murdering people in the street. There's no "because your boss is a clown" exception.
Those who stand to gain from the absence of privacy ("faang adtech bs") need you to think this way.

The truth is there is a ton of incremental progress that can be made to restore our privacy and yes, to some degree it starts with the rejection of existing adtech norms.
I have (in depth, often under the gun of a production outage).

Kubernetes is not a good example of idiomatic Go in any sense. Perhaps Spring Boot and friends are also not good examples of idiomatic Java, but they are absolutely the common case of what is found in the wild.
I mean it’s a color space. ;)

And you can say: “I choose you, Uchū!” ;)

But yeah, jūiro would have been more fitting.
I don't see how that matters. Bomb them or turn them off, it is only acts as a disincentive for China if they are reliant on Taiwanese chips.

Forcing China to develop domestic production makes invasion more likely.
How do those stores report to HQ when they don't have power? Even cell towers could be down if the situation is bad enough.
Spring may not be Java (The Language), but it absolutely is Java (The Ecosystem).
The Noise Removal plugin takes a bit getting used to, but I have had great results from it. I don't mean to point to operator error... it's got too many options for someone new to it to tune.
Trump is happy to golf and sign EOs.

Musk... Has probably cooked his brain on a combination of stimulants and ketamine and Neo-Nazi Twitter. He's living on entirely frictionless life because of his money and thinks his scions will be the princes of Mars.
The Republicans, for all their whinging over the debt when they're not in power and using it to give the Democrats temporary black eyes, are highly unlikely to do anything that directly endangers big business profits or the stock market going up.

Defaulting on the debt has no upside for them now, so probably won't happen.
It’s true that the concept of ‘universality’ wouldn’t be expressed using a word like uchu — perhaps more likely something like fuhenteki (普遍的) or just fuhen ? — but this is how one Japanese dictionary chooses to define uchu:

あらゆる存在物を包容する無限の空間と時間の広がり。

So it (if you trust this definition) refers to time as well as space. It’s slightly more abstract than just ‘space’.

The Japanese entry corresponding to the English Wikipedia entry for ‘universe’ is also called 宇宙, though it is of course effectively about space.

…considering it further, I think you’re completely right. I’ll leave what I’ve written above in case it’s of interest to others.
Quoting a reddit comment:

> Wow, this is almost a parody. An able-bodied meth addict and convicted felon was illegally living in a public park for 20 years, littering the land around him and forcing rangers to spend countless time and resources cleaning up the mess he left behind, making regular emergency room visits due to his unhealthy lifestyle costing the city hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, constantly doing illegal drugs while not holding down a job and suspiciously acquiring new supplies for his encampment after every sweep (how much do you want to be he engages in illegal activity), and giving an extremely hard time to caseworkers and HHS staff who already have a busy workload (including leaving/getting kicked out of housing multiple times). That one Golden Gate Park Dweller has probably cost the city millions of dollars over the last few years while consuming valuable time from caseworkers and park rangers who could be helping someone else (they're already overloaded). Not to mention the potential damage to the park's environment caused by his littering. What this guy needs is outpatient mental health treatment, and it's honestly criminal that our country has basically no resources for people with mental illness and shoves them into jail or shelters without treating their underlying problems.