skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The JDK comes with a program called key tool. You use key tool to build a "trust store". This is basically a collection of certs you trust. There is also a "key store" which contains your cert and its private key. Then when you run your app you must specify what key store and trust store to use.
I found this funny enough to tell a co-worker about it.
If a coffee shop is doing this deliberately to manipulate you, is it therefore ethical to give the illusion of progress to the coffee shop in turn, by stamping a couple yourself?
Looks like Marissa has learned the lesson told by Steve Blank in his famous essay, the elves leave middle earth

http://steveblank.com/2009/12/21/the-elves-leave-middle-eart...

It has bought her time with the engineers while she decides what to do.
Ah, thanks for the correction and teaching me something.
You and the original poster are completely wrong and misunderstanding the situation.

"The CEO founded the 30 person company, and there are no other investors- it's all his money", if true, means that he's not CEO (in the startup sense) at all - he's the owner.

"Anyone have any advice on how to tell a CEO with no superiors to let everyone do their jobs?"

Their job is to do whatever he wants. If he wants you to hire three people to do interpretive dance in front of a web cam and put it up, go ahead.

As long as he's the whole owner, you should act like you're being paid to paint his house. Whatever he wants, as long as he's paying the checks. If you can't do what he asks or don't want to at that price, quote the price you'll do it for or leave. If you can do what he asks for the price he's paying, do whatever he says.

It's his house.
I agree. Work should make you feel satisfied. If your current job doesn't do that for you, find one that does.

EDIT: However, thinking about this from the opposite position; perhaps the CEO is looking for advice regarding employees who won't take instruction?
Yahoo gave up on being a technology leader when they killed their own search. If I was Mayer I would buy DuckDuckGo and say fuck it, we're taking on Google.
The official Oracle/Sun JVM ships its own file-based certificate store containing the root certificates of authorities it trusts. It does not, at any time, interoperate with OS-wide stores, nor does it assume they might exist. This makes it fully portable, but of course adds a further burden in terms of maintenance.

Same for the JRockit JVM.
In Job Hunting, the Pas de Deux of Seeker and Offerer
Java uses a keystore (actually - being Java - you can set a property to tell it which keystore to use).

Importing a new certificate is documented here: http://java.sun.com/j2ee/tutorial/1_3-fcs/doc/Security10.htm...

The verification of the certificate is delegated to a TrustManager[1]. Certificate paths can be checked[2] and the TrustManager is flexible enough to support a large variety of verification scenarios[3].

[1] http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/api/javax/net/ssl/T...

[2] http://www.exampledepot.com/egs/java.security.cert/ValidCert...

[3] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11681474/how-can-i-trust-...
I checked out the jobs page, but I got a 404 error. I'd love to talk though, so feel free to drop me a line (my email is in my profile) or leave your email here.
I think that's worrying - people don't have the language to begin to understand the Higgs boson.

Not just that they don't know what a boson is, but they don't really know what particles are, or what energy is, or what mass is. And so when you need to explain what the Higgs Boson is you need to give the simple lies we tell people when we explain physics

I live in the UK. BBC Radio 4 has a "flagship" news and current affairs programme called 'Today'.[1] Science is routinely handled as if the audience are idiots, while arts are given free range to be reasonably esoteric.

[1] Today website (http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/default.stm)
This looks quite useable from a client-end developer-level given the RESTful nature of the draft description, I look forward to seeing some provider implementation code. https://github.com/webSSO/internetDraft
Show HN: My first Game. A HTML5 video puzzle (look at the src)
Definitely a smart decision by Marissa. The savings from feeding employees is definitely outweighed by the productivity and morale gained from satisfied employees. Make your employees feel proud and good to work there.
Nest looks really cool and I like the idea of having a physical (as opposed to virtual) product. Are you interested in hiring any junior engineers? Feel free to drop me a line (my email is in my profile) or leave your email here, I'd love to chat.
But there are reams of math and many fields of science (astronomy, paleontology) that have no practical utility. It's quite easy to find this sort of material in any university, in books, etc.

While I won't directly take on your social signaling claim, there are some humanities which have clear utility (while also functioning as social signals), for example knowing the precise meaning and usage of a large set of words. People in the academy are not disdained for having this practical facility.

An adjusted version of your claim: I think that in some countries (including the U.S.) math & hard science are tarnished through their association with poorly-protected and therefore indifferently remunerated professions, such as accounting, pharmacology, and engineering. Most educated people I encounter would, all things being equal, like to be good at math, but some let themselves off a little easy. Trying and being bad at history would make you dumber than a lawyer, which feels okay; trying and being bad at algebra makes you dumber than an accountant, which is humiliating--so better not to try.
Well I'll just first disclaim that I don't have any design experience with Li-Po batteries, although reading about them I don't see any odd requirements. The guideline to not "charge them directly" is in contrast to say lead-acid batteries, which you can simply hook up to an appropriate voltage supply and let them sit indefinitely ("trickle charging").

To the extent that you need to worry about it, the voltage on the two will be the same. The battery power only drops as you're drawing current. The point of the capacitor is to smooth out changes to the load by supplying current "first". Your capacitor will never get "more" charged than the battery somehow. The main difference versus "charging" is that you have no external energy source.

From a slightly more advanced perspective, the reason for the capacitor is to smooth out the (possibly bidirectional!) transient loads on the battery. It's quite possible that your "inductive buzzer" (depending on how it's driven) is actually backfeeding a little current through the arduino and onto the supply rails. Your battery will never be overcharged this way because any such energy came from the battery itself, but smoothing out the spikes with a capacitor eases the stress on the battery. In fact, I'd be surprised if the arduino board didn't have a decent-sized capacitor immediately on its supply lines, and this is part of the reason.
I'm not trying to win a legal case here, just sayin'... 1.
"The broadcast industry does not want American's to
know..." Opinion. Why would they want this widely known?
2. "...legally obligated..." OK, that might be a little
strong, but I stand by the POV that they can not encrypt
this signal. The FCC citations (on Engadget article) make
that clear (to me).

Agree. Sorry if I'm being pedantic, but this is really nothing more than the cable companies being compelled to broadcast these "mandatory carriage" channels without encryption and the impracticality of filtering every non-subscriber.

It's possible that this works for me (and others)
because... I am a subscriber to my cable company for
telephone and internet access (but not TV), and so they
can not send a tech out to disconnect me from their grid
because it would terminate my current services[...]

That's why it works; however, it's not so much that they can't disconnect you but that they can't practically filter you.

[...] AND they can not encrypt the Clear QAM signal for
the Broadcast TV channels.

They can't encrypt but they can filter non-subscribers. If this were always practical, there's no doubt many companies would aggressively filter.

Again, I'm not trying to argue some legal case here. But I
do think it's more than just the cable company being lazy
and not sending a technician out.

Sure, the impracticality is there but no legal impediments that I know of :)
So back when I was a PhD student, we had an idea for a Captcha system that would be better than the current system and all alternatives by quite a margin, but we talked to some experts in the area, and they said that none of this matters because captchas are normally broken by feeding them to mturkers or people wanting to get into porn sites.

Is that no longer true? If so, I should look at reviving our old system.
I guess I don't see taxes as particularly immoral. Of all the things the state can impose on people, having people who've already made some decent money chip in a percentage for the common good seems low on the list. Even (unpaid) jury duty seems more objectionable than that.

Though I do share some of your concerns about "force". I think criminal sanctions are resorted to too quickly for a lot of things, both taxes and other infractions (any time you lie to the government, or otherwise do something it doesn't like). I'd rather emphasize civil remedies to collect.
I'd like to work for / with her.
In the US (where the RIAA operates), the levy only applies to CD-Rs that are labeled as being for "Music." Standard CD-Rs and DVD+/-Rs, and so forth aren't covered.
I'm not sure I quite follow your logic. I can't figure out if you're asking a rhetorical question (and thus trying to make a point) or you generally are questioning your own self?

If it's the former, I'd suggest you a be slightly more direct about what point you are trying to make. Alternatively simply just upvote or ignore the story all together.
I checked out the website, but I didn't see a jobs page. I'd be interested in chatting too, so feel free to drop me an email (my email can be found in my profile) or leave yours here.
Why working so hard, when M2Crypto [1] will do everything for you [2] ?

If you're doing anything serious with Python and SSL, you're going to use M2Crypto - period. Because when it comes to security, the less you "roll your own", the better.

[1] http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/MeTooCrypto

[2] http://svn.osafoundation.org/m2crypto/trunk/demo/x509/certda...
I know that YC has a stake in the Duck and pardon my ignorance but what is so "racketish-science" here in DDG that Marissa and bunch of Google engineers couldn't come up with on their own terms, without having to reach out to Y! wallet?
And here you've nicely summarized why I think I've seen so many technically-inclined philosophy grads working as sysadmins...

Totally a case of selection bias, given I'm one of those and notice them, but I've long been convinced that a love of systems creation and debugging is the common attribute between philosophers and sysadmins.
Yes and Postmates is available 16 hours a day, on weekends as well. TaskRabbit operates "business hours on week days" only.
Welcome to HN, where everyone is a rockstar entrepreneur!
The easy answer is quit. If you're not inclined to do that, you can either demonstrate to him that he doesn't need to micromanage you and everything else or help him grow the business so much that he can't micromanage everything. In either case, you can't make him do anything. He owns the business; you just work there.
I tried to reach a Yahoo PR person for comment, but my phone remains unrung, even here in Israel.

I don't understand this sentence. Is her phone more likely to ring because she's in Israel, or something?
The limited connectivity is very interesting -- my experience with artificial neural nets is pretty limited, but are there many well-studied ANN models that have a similar structure to this? The spatial restrictions are so simple that it seems like they'd lend themselves to efficient implementation.
Yes the creative presentation of factual information can be protected intellectual property. Craigslist however only collects information it is given and displays them as such. Craigslist does not add any creativity or originality to the posts.

The is no "Craigslist-hate" but I do disagree on their claimed ownership of facts. I think Feist v. Rural (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US...) covered this pretty well.
Seems like these are all moral boosting tweaks. Friday meetings that keep employees up-to-speed, free food, and updated swag. Gets people talking and they can see physical things happening! This is re-org 101. Make no mistake, the real changes that will turn Yahoo around, take months, if not years to get rolling.
The "MIT syndrome" thing is crucial. I think the most important trait in a startup leader is humility. To build a kick-ass sustainable company, you absolutely, positively must be comfortable working with people who are (in some or most respects) smarter than you.

Also, I find it very interesting that the "high" of this roller coaster is the funding.
Of course, I'd defend people's right to say stuff like this. And in a twisted way, it was really funny. But it doesn't make for very good discussion.
Students entering MIT are the ones acing every class, being constantly praised by teachers/parents and feeling better than everyone else in high school.
Then they enter MIT, where they find themselves with hundreds of fellow students just like them.

For a lot of personalities, this leads to depression and even in some instances suicide.
>>> Free food is a bonus.

It's also good for Yahoo. It encourages employees to stay on campus for longer, so Yahoo gets more value out of them.
I don't know if buying DDG would be a good investment.

Yahoo! had a great search engine to begin with. There wasn't anything wrong with it, really. I think Yahoo! just got a bit carried away with the UI aspect of it.

DDG prides itself on privacy and no tracking while giving good results. I don't think Yahoo! would be interested in keeping that tradition.

Though, I could be wrong, of course.

edit: was supposed to reply to the other guy... oops.. message still stands.
Yahoo! gave up on being a technology leader long before search imploded on them and they were forced to give it up. They gave up on that in a very definitive way when a clueless board chose Terry Semel to run the company in the belief that they were a "media company".
That is only because TaskRabbit have been around longer. I think this space will get seriously interesting - but Postmates will take the crown.
I'd be more interested in what she's decided he WON'T change. What redeeming qualities does Yahoo have? (That's not a rhetorical question; I'm genuinely interested.)
I don't like Kara Swisher's tone throughout the whole article. Praises to Mayer for making smart moves.
I think it's obvious that Yahoo! needs some serious internal "disruption." I think the biggest thing they need is relevance. Incremental improvements to their search, email, etc I don't think will matter. If Yahoo's search started being 5% better than Google, by whatever metric you prefer, would anyone really care? I would still use Google. I think in many consumer's view, and even probably many of us, we have all just been wondering when this all Yahoo! thing was going to end, whether was from a buyout by MS or whatever. They need some kind of breakout product, surely they know this but we've been waiting for awhile now. Honestly, I think it's got to be something more than just acquisition. Honestly, just now I visited yahoo.com, (not yahoo answers or any of that, the homepage), I haven't done that in years. I'll say this, it's a strange place.
Right, there's so much rhetoric about being a producer and not a consumer, when (as you point out) the things being produced are mostly pretty underwhelming. As if it doesn't really matter too much what you're making as long as you're a maker and not one of those yucky consumer zombies.
http://careers.yahoo.com/
I'd be curious to see an example.

I seem to recall a 19th-C. MIT entrance exam as comparable to or maybe behind what my better high-school classmates learned.
I think IT is more like confessions on anyone starting out at anything. Tanks for verifying what carnegie said.. 100 years ago ;-)
Yeah, I'd say it is. Sinatra is much more modern and actively developed.
At this point, in the year 2012, isn't this just called modern? Sure a decade ago google was the only one doing this. However, aren't most startups/competitive tech companies in the bay area offering free food?

If Yahoo wants to compete for talent against the SF startups, facebook, google, etc. It seems like this isn't googley, its just part of the modern benefit package.
Interesting sidenote: in Germany, the camps are subtly different: Geisteswissenschaften - "mind sciences" vs. Naturwissenschaften - "nature sciences". And mathematics belongs to the former (although most people are probably not aware of that and the same attitude criticised by TFA is quite common).
I think this is because an A record query for www.kodefund.com returns multiple CNAME records, which is not compliant with the DNS specification:

mrowe@vega:~$ dig A www.kodefund.com @a.dns.gandi.net

; <<>> DiG 9.8.1-P1 <<>> A www.kodefund.com @a.dns.gandi.net
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 53562
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.kodefund.com.	IN	A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.kodefund.com.	10800	IN	CNAME	intense-ocean-3642.herokuapp.com.
www.kodefund.com.	10800	IN	CNAME	mie-9107.herokussl.com.

;; Query time: 125 msec
;; SERVER: 173.246.97.2#53(173.246.97.2)
;; WHEN: Sun Jul 29 16:47:59 2012
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 110

If I perform the same query via my system resolver rather than directly against the gandi.net DNS servers then I simply receive no result:

mrowe@vega:~$ dig A www.kodefund.com

; <<>> DiG 9.8.1-P1 <<>> A www.kodefund.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 36608
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.kodefund.com.	IN	A

;; Query time: 1306 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.1.254#53(192.168.1.254)
;; WHEN: Sun Jul 29 16:48:58 2012
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 34

This is presumably because one of the intermediate resolver is being strict about the presence of multiple CNAMEs in the result.
I thought DuckDuckGo relies on Bing for searching?
There's not been a good simple general directory since yahoo stopped being one. Search is one thing, structured reference is different. Though it is a much more difficult problem now and would need a completely different approach to achieve it.
I'll sum it up for you in one sentence: Marissa Mayer needs to figure out what Yahoo! is supposed to be good at.

Right now Yahoo! isn't remarkably good at anything.
This is limited electronics knowledge, plus conjecture. Buyer beware:
- Direct (unmanaged) LiPo charging is to be avoided because the cells react so violently to overcharging.
- Compared to a LiPo cell even a 100 uF capacitor contains essentially zero energy.

The capacitor won't overcharge the LiPo, because it would almost immediately expend the charge it stored
This article has no real defense or data points of CL, just bunch of words trying to provoke emotions. Title is also designed to be link bait by equating critic of CL with entire Silicon Valley.

I wonder if the author of the post understands the problem here or has some other hidden agenda. It is very clear that CL had no reason to send lawyers if a guy was not even scrapping their website. The fact is CL has effectively become monopoly by levering network effect. This network effect had been created by gaining trust of users and its "public good" philosophy. In my view, CL's actions have betrayed those users. Now they are more concerned with saving their business and stopping others to become more popular. Because of lack of resources they can't invest in new innovations but they also don't want others to do it either. They have created a fence around data which is not even owned by them.

A company that preaches "public good" and then goes out to hires top tier lawyers for "copyright violations" isn't doing "unqualified good thing".
Not too critical and there is a world of difference between hope Joe Benefactor keeps shelling out his $100 a week (and then depending on 20 of them) and having pay check like the rest of the world.
Thanks for writing this. As a 20-something startup CEO, I frequently want to write about something mundane (or not) but often choose not to for reasons of confidentiality or that I worry some things will cause problems for me later. I don't think I'm a startup god, or an expert at all. Sometimes it would just help to vent or have a discussion about something with strangers who are in similar positions as me.

Unlike some of the other commenters here, your post didn't strike me as self-important. Just looked like you felt like sharing and wanted to have a dialog.
Bayi lucu youtube
gambar2 bayi lucu
http://poto.kompinter.com/2012/07/photo-bayi-lucu.html Entah sampai saat ini debaran itu masih sungguh terasa hingga ia menghilang meredam dan akupun masih sendiri tanpamu bersama bodohnya egoku
You do get a different "qualia". The "northpaw" has been around for a few years, it's a set of pager-buzzers that always buzz on the north side of your leg. http://sensebridge.net/projects/northpaw/ Users say they stop feeling the vibrations pretty quickly and they just "know" which way is north. http://www.quinnnorton.com/said/?tag=northpaw
Neither I nor the guy who authored the linked articles is a lawyer. I'm sure there's a wealth of precedents that outline exactly whether and how much a statement like that is enforceable. If taken at face value, which is all you can do without soliciting a legal opinion, this paragraph is cause for concern (all their data including downhill segments is user generated).
I'd be surprised if there wasn't a hiring freeze right now while they asses what they have. If you look around this site there is all of 4 listings!!
Isn't DDG just Bing w/ some logic to bump up anything that shows up in various authoritative sites like Wikipedia?

Yahoo already uses Bing.
Simon, the first smartphone
JQuery1.com - #1 resource for jQuery news
What are are making is cool, and we have the potential to get huge so I'd like to stay.

Everyone does exactly what he says, so he should have no issues with anyone not taking instruction from him.

It just sucks to leave a meeting knowing that we are doing it the wrong way and can't do anything to fix it. I want to fix it.
Indeed. Ironic that "being a producer" is heralded so when the marginal cost of production of these goods really is around ~$0.00 in many/most/virtually all cases. I'm just say'n is all...
A lot of the comments, imho, don't seem to understand Andrew Chen's post and are just fixating on some of the terminology. In fairness it would be easier to do so had the reader of this post been a regular reader of his blog. It is more readily understood in that context. I recommend reading his analysis of how AirBnB went about hacking for growth. And there are some excellent posts on growth hacking on Quora.
I see at least 170 openings in Sunnyvale alone.
Apparently someone disagrees with me enough to downvote, but is too stupid to actually explain why.
The point of this app is not to 'follow' routes, but record them and compare them over certain sections (segments) to those recorded by others. Usually, 10 m is enough to figure out what road you're on, and after that they only look at the time it took to get from start to finish of the segment. Even if you're off by 10 m, at 20 mph that translates into about a second -- and these timings are pretty approximate anyway.