skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The question whether or not to support the ESM is completely separate from the question where Germanys current success is coming from.

The 172 renowned economists are basically stating the obvious that covering for the spending sprees that our lending-power allowed the slow-economy EU countries will hurt the German economy.

To me the question if we should or shouldn't support the ESM is a moral one to which i don't have an answer. We benefited from the Euro the most and the very system that allowed our success is now asking who pays the bills. Tough question to answer.
The reason I'm not using 2FA right now is twofold. First, because Google doesn't have half of their services using it for some undefined reason (for at least a year plus!). Also, the whole "app specific password" thing is a huge pain in the ass. (And appears to randomly stop working on say, IMAP mail).

Second, because the mobile authenticator is not feasible for me right now. I do a lot of android development work (well, mostly screwing around, but we'll call it work) on the side, with the result that I'm wiping my phone for romflashes at least once a week. Makes everything going through a mobile app a little useless.

I really wish Google would support a hardware token of some kind.
Am I the only that thinks this is very, very wrong? Basically, indoctrinate from a very young age your future clientele to use your website for day to day activites while making it acceptable for the parents to let their kids use Facebook from a very young age, increasing brand awareness by doing so, then when they're ready BLAM. Give them easy access to these gambling features.

I fear this is a very dangerous move morally for Facebook, and are venturing a lot more into the "evil" category than just "selling your privacy" evil.
Teens Using More Drugs, Alcohol and Tobacco During Summer
Teens Using More Drugs, Alcohol and Tobacco During Summer
> I have an application that only needs to send E-Mail through my GMail account (git-send-email), another that only needs to write to one specific GMail label (Android SMS Backup)

Maybe you should use throwaway accounts for these purposes? That is, have a gmail account for github to send your patches through, and have that forward to your main email account?

In the SMS-backup case...how important is it that you access your SMSes in your Gmail account? My first thought is: it's bad enough that someone breaks into my email, nevermind all my SMSes. But I guess if you have a workflow that requires easy access to SMSes with your email, you can still have a separate email account that does nothing but forward it onto your main account.

So your main account, theoretically, has strong security with the two-factor authentication without having to make backdoors for external apps. People can always break into your throwaway accounts, but they'll have no particular inroad into your main account.

And presumably, you'd have a decent window of time to detect an intrusion and administer the throwaway accounts with your main GMail account
If you want your d3 graphs to work in IE8 you might want to use https://github.com/shawnbot/aight
Yes, can someone explain why Google Chrome doesn't support 2FA on the desktop or iOS? It's bizarre.

(Well, I suppose it's tragically normal. I'm sure there is a corporate directive that says every Google service must support 2FA, but Chrome has an exception so they don't need to do it yet.)
MailLive
Note that they had to break into the account in order to view those last 4 digits. You seem to be implying that they show them to anyone.

Either way, using the last 4 digits as 'security' is just stupid. You can get those from a receipt.
The Minfraud service I mention in the article has an automatic phone verification system. You can use it when the risk score crosses a certain threshold
I know it gets talked about quite a lot round here but I find zsh really quite useful for this type of thing..

the zsh equivalent of the above, for me would be

ls **/* -ltr

(Edit)[ for an exact reproduction ]

ls **/*(.) -ltr

if you wanted to put a date range on it.. for example, only files from the last 5 days..

ls **/*(m-5) -ltr

or the last 5 hours

ls **/*(mh-5) -ltr

there's loads more of these http://grml.org/zsh/zsh-lovers.html, obviously your shell is a matter of preference, and if you know bash or something similar well enough then the incentive to change is obviously lessened.. but personally I've found that a whole series of small improvements (for me) added up to a pretty large win

edit: as pointed out by pyre, my initial suggestion isn't an exact replica.. but was the first thing that came to mind for me.. i guess s/the\ zsh\ equivalent/something\ similar\ in\ zsh/

edit again:

/tmp/ $ mkdir -p /tmp/test1/test2/test3
/tmp/ $ touch /tmp/test1/test2/test3/test4
/tmp/ $ ls -ltr /tmp/test1/**/*(.)
-rw-r--r-- 1 usr grp 0 Aug 7 15:49 /tmp/test1/test2/test3/test4
/tmp/ $ find /tmp/test1 -type f -print0 | xargs -0 ls -ltr
-rw-r--r-- 1 usr grp 0 Aug 7 15:49 /tmp/test1/test2/test3/test4
Why wouldn't two-factor authentication protected Mat from at least his GMail account being hacked? Even if password-resets were being sent to the .Me account, wouldn't the hackers still need to generate the authentication token?
The extension requires login to Ge.tt (it's free). And the Gmail login goes through the normal Google login.

What the extension does is to add a button to the page and when you click that files are uploaded to Ge.tt and a link is added to your email body. There's no exchange of any Google login needed.
Arcades are cool, but they're too damn expensive. Make each game 5c and I'll play all the time.
Yeah, unfortunately it seems like the only rights it is missing is "update account information". Which is not much good when you are trying to protect your data.
To me, the use case you describe would make me very happy to be using two factor auth - logging into a very important personal account using untrusted, public computers I don't control. I'd be glad for the extra hassle with that.
I would really love for MS to get in to the full hardware game, both on tablets, but also maybe smaller phone-form devices and maybe eventually desktops/laptops. Let them create what they consider the 'best' MS/windows experience. It might bring some people back to the MS camp, assuming it's good (and I suspect it would be).

The damage done to the MS brand over the past decade or so by manufacturers bundling crap on cheap hardware is enormous, and it may take MS either getting in to the hardware game directly, or tightening control over what can have Windows shipped on it, before we see a reversal of that. The same thing is playing out with Android - not sure why they didn't learn from the MS story.

This is not suggesting everyone should always and only make their own hardware, but without sufficient quality controls in place, the brand gets tarnished pretty quickly.
According to Matt (and, apparently, his hacker) you're wrong; two-factor would have saved him in this particular instance: "If I had some other account aside from an Apple e-mail address, or had used two-factor authentication for Gmail, everything would have stopped here." (http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/08/apple-amazon-mat-hona...)

Naturally, it's not a panacea, but I think a lot of people allow perfect to be the enemy of quite good when it comes to two-factor auth.
Would also be interested in hearing more. Looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Germany#Tuition_fe... for example - depending on where you live it seems you might have to pay tuition fees but how much exactly?
I believe actions like this can actually drive away regular facebook users. Their need for income is taking them further away from what should be their goal and that's to "be cool again". Naturally, people's interest has been dropping and they need a way to restore it. Gambling is not a way to do it and they can lose much more than they can gain with it.
Senate Anti-Leaks Bill Threatens the Rights of the Press and the Public
It does if you set up the sync account via the Settings page, but if you ignore the request to sign in, visit some Google page that requires login and log in, Chrome will produce a yellow bar at the top of the screen asking if you want to use that account for Chrome sync. Click yes and you don't need to sign in any further.
Linux/Android/Chromium are not economically viable alternatives to Windows for hardware manufacturers on a large enough scale.

On the consumer side it's "Not only is it not a Mac, it doesn't even come with Windows."

On the commercial side it's, "Can it run Excel" - some things never change and Visicalc is still the killer application, so to speak.

It is, in my opinion, a mistake to expect corporations to operate on the principles which drive persons. So long as Windows remains a profitable operating system for Acer, Acer will continue to install it. And that will continue to be the case unless Best Buy starts hiring Linux gurus for its sales floor.
Did you see it after she used it for a week?

/Sorry.