skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There's also another problem: The git workflow doesn't jell with the natural flow of code review.

What should that flow look like?

1. You send out a change for review.
2. You get review comments.
3. You fix the comments.
4. Repeat from #2 as many times as necessary.
5. You merge the change.

In git, how do you address review comments? You can either amend, in which case, at least on Github, you lose history while in review; or you add another commit, which essentially forces you to squash when you merge, which results in large commits.

How do you do stacked changes? How do you continue working on your feature while waiting for a change to be reviewed, and rebase the comments quickly?

With jj, it's jj edit and jj next.
Source Code: My Beginnings by Bill Gates Review: Refreshingly Frank
Gato Multilingual for Polylang: automatic translations for WordPress
Just because companies are paying X doesn't mean that X isn't a low sum.

Calling 10k an "extraordinarily high sum" is accurate to some and inaccurate to others.

I would bet the groups would differ by perceived personal cost more than the opinion of Google, Apple, and the like. These groups would also probably show distinction where people have been victimized by "identity theft."

The opinions of those bearing the cost are more important here, in my opinion.
To check: to stop forcibly.

Synonyms: detain, stem, clog, bottleneck, balk, baffle, hobble, bridle, block, obstruct, hamper, hinder, impede, to cause a reduction, such as in rate or intensity; diminish.

Use it in a sentence.

He checked their facts.
Does this work for reading articles on websites?
DEI itself creates the situation
where having the wrong gender or skin color was the reason to not get a job.

You cannot fight racism/sexism with racism/sexism.
Beyond the Basic GPT-Wrapper
Well.. I'm running it on an M3 and it can be truly slow. Not always! But opening up a package inside a multi-module Kotlin project can literally take 10 seconds. Which isn't much seeing how great of an IDE it is and how much time it saves because it is so powerful. But it's heavy alright. Every time I see new features I don't really use, I wish they would invest in trimming fat instead.
The CEO of the company has proven himself time and again to not be trustworthy depending on his moods. Is that not relevant to this?
Metal detectors were common since the 1970s. There were plenty of hijackings and a few bombings before then.

Also technology improved that the terrorist had.
Katamaritaino is up there with Clash On The Big Bridge and Flow as best songs that happened to be made for games.

The OST for the first two games, how they stick (ha!) well together, and how WLK managed to be a perfect blend of paying homage to the first game (Scorching Savanna!) _and_ being a solid improvement on it should be studied.

It's striking to me how humble Takahashi-sensei is regarding the shortcomings he perceives in the first game as well. I can see them much better dealt with in We Love Katamari, but I feel like some of them aren't that bad as a player who picks it to play every once in a while. In turn, it makes me appreciate the holistic and honest view he has for such an original game.
I can't replicate the initial problem, at least pushing to Bitbucket. I'm using Windows, so I didn't use `touch` - instead I used 'echo' to create a new file in a shallow clone of my repo. That repo is 126 MB on Bitbucket, and the shallow clone downloaded 6395 objects taking 40.68 MB.

I've tried with a new file both having content ('Test shallow clone push'), and again with an empty file. In both cases it pushed 3 objects, and in the empty file case it reused one (it turns out my repo already has some empty files in it).

It's always possible that this is (or was) a GitHub bug - I haven't tried it there.
Astronomers have spotted the closest ever Einstein ring
Uline turned to Mexico to staff warehouses, paid them a fraction of US workers
The 'Huberman husbands' phenomenon sweeping the US
Show HN: upfetch – Advanced fetch client builder for TypeScript
To be fair it is in part due to containers being a really nice way to deploy languages with fat-runtimes.
Can you see the irony in a critique that alleges a lack of substance itself containing no substance?
Are you staying under the 12-pound ICAO-limit for a payload (which must be split into two packages)? If so, how much power is continuously available to the payload and how long can each balloon stay aloft?
https://www.statista.com/statistics/187867/public-debt-of-th...

https://www.salon.com/2018/02/12/thom-hartmann-how-the-gop-u...

In brief: It worked very badly the first time and the only reason you were conned into thinking differently was massive debt.
So why don’t we all just stay at home or bike everywhere?
Apple doesn't really do a lot of classic sales. They have people with enterprise accounts and so forth but most of what they do to tell you about products and get people to write about them is fairly classic marketing.

But to your other point, sure. There is a saying about helping to make your luck, but, yes, there is also luck in just about any career or success.
It’s absolutely front and center of its marketing page.
Writing a Gimp 3.0 Plugin
He is not getting handouts, he is doing risky uncertain rocket science that even NASA was unable tondo and gets compensated for risk and hard work
Yes true. What if could take advantage of both ecosystm.
I violently recoil at comments like this.

Elon is so effective as a leader he seems to break people’s brains. No other person could have started this company and had even half this success. There’s a reason all the most talented flock to his companies, despite “conventional wisdom” saying they shouldn’t. It takes a lot of self deception to ignore the reality that he obviously must be doing something right.
What eventually pulled you out of it? Was it a long journey, or one or more specific events?
Slow? Jetbrains IDEs, slow? Compared to, of all things, the LSP-reliant VS Code?

I pay for them primarily to save me from LSP, which they do for many languages, though the Elixir plugin is not by Jetbrains (but it actually predates LSP itself).
And to add to that, as programmers I think we sometimes miss how inefficient most people’s workflows are. Ever watched a family member, friend, etc use a computer and you just want to pull out your hair? They are just used to it, “that’s how things are”. Even a simple tool can do wonders for someone’s workflow and can worth quite a bit to them even if you think it’s easy/obvious/just-use-X-tool.

Heck, you can even solve “simple” problems for developers and they will pay to avoid having to implement it themselves. Take a thorny process, wrap it up in a clean api with a nice UI and you’re set. I pay for multiple dev tools that I could write if I wanted to put in the effort [0] but it’s not worth the effort to keep up with it and paying $XX makes the problem go away, I’m sold.

[0] and I think we often underestimate what it would actually take to re-create a tool/SaaS. The core feature might be “easy” but all the other parts are what’s hard. Coding is rarely the hardest part of building a product IMHO.
electric goo would be a nice one!
Can you define mis- and disinformation and bring up two real world examples of each please.
Underground ammonia production: natural forces offer sustainable solution
Gov.uk insiders: AI datacenters may be pricey white elephant
GR had some primitive social features that none of the competitors, as far as I know, could replicate. Side-effect of being the largest. Even an exact clone wouldn't behave the same. It was the core of the blogging ecosystem, and IMO its removal was the main cause of blogging falling apart.

All so they could clear the way for Google Plus. And look how that turned out.

So yeah, watershed moment, the point where the scales fell from my eyes, still justifiably pissed, fool me twice, etc etc etc

(Still using RSS daily, though I lapsed for a while).
I would challenge you to give me examples where security feels "real" and how does that help.

Most software products rely on very complex software stacks, and if you trust 100% all the libraries and the OS you use I would say it's a wrong mindset. There were bugs even in the processor (meltdown). Security is a continuous battle and you never know if you won, only (sometimes) if you loose.
That's not the question. The question was "you can change the toolbars and shortcuts in JetBrains Rider, no?"

I presume the answer is yes, from what you said. Then it becomes less of an issue, if not an non-issue.

IDEs and code editors are tools which we live with for a long time. Nobody expects their defaults to be unchanged. Otherwise we'd be all using notepad.exe for coding.

Not having the defaults organized by your tastes is not a valid reason for disqualifying a tool out of the gate.

As a counter example, Electron's font rendering is nothing to drool over, from my perspective, and doesn't give an extra point for using it in my case.
I’m sure the powers that be at HN will be along shortly to lock/remove/censor any article/discussion that doesn’t show enough deference to Musk, as seems to be the new custom.

It takes them awhile sometimes, but they’ll get here.
Eating from plastic takeout containers can increase heart failure risk
In my case it is because I am wary of these tools breaking in a way which cannot be fixed, or services being suddenly revoked for external reasons.

Example: now that I'm a solopreneur I use JetBrains DataGrip, and overall I am very pleased with it. But I couldn't have it on my previous two jobs. One of the jobs restricted my work computer to only allow MySQL Workbench (arbitrary Powershell scripts also were allowed, of course), and the other one didn't want to pay for a licence, no matter how much I pleaded.

So before I had to make due with (admittedly) inferior tools because they were free and available as the lowest common denominator in the general workplace.

Being comfortable with the tools affects a large part of my productivity, and I'm more productive with a crappy-but-familiar toolbox than I am with the unknown spaceship.
Donny is elected and doge is basically implementing what donny has promised to voters all along

I dont see discrepancy or conflict here, would you expect donny auditing expenses by himself exclusively ?
It existed at all because Steve Jobs convinced the people working on it to believe in it enough to care. This is really rare, most people don't care (and are rational not to) but it is required to make any great product
As is tradition it will be followed by two other YC startups: A1 and B0
Is he rooting out corruption and wasteful spending though? Or is he himself corrupt and attempting to stomp out agencies for his own benefit? It seems like the latter to me, considering which agencies he's targeting, half (or more) of his statements about the spending being falsehoods, the lack of proper processes, the people he's hired, etc.

I don't understand how people can be against due process, accountability, and genuine public service. Or are you just brainwashed by right-wing media?
Shut Up, Siri. Why there will be no monoculture of human-computer interaction
Well, it's always amusing how they discover that applications can run locally without depending on someone else's servers and maybe without pulling unverified code from 50 random repos.

Next they'll discover native applications! Innovation!

Maybe after that they'll even discover that you can give a shit about the user's battery/power consumption and ram consumption again!
> I find it very, very distracting.

The human brain has cognitive subsystems devoted to detecting motion that seems non-random, that is, that seems to move with deliberate purpose contrary to other motions like leaves or ripples. It's important for predation on both sides—for the predator or the prey.

That's also exactly why advertisers love it and will continue using it. They will buy any politicians who look likely to ban moving images or lights.
It depends on the application. And gp was talking about stability and ease of use, not speed.
I don't think it was killed by security, since nobody cares about security. At most companies care about pretending to do security.
I feel your pain. I recently bought a book on storytelling and it contains no hints whatsoever on how to tell a story. Just like this article, the book it's all "connect with your audience by opening with an emotional story" but not a single paragraph on why (say) a joke told by a comedian has much more punch than when I retell it.

Obviously reading about comedy is probably like dancing about architecture, but nonetheless I'd expect some discussion on the delivery itself. Otherwise it's just "storyplanning".
> But at least it's almost completely inert (unless overheated), which makes it much less likely to be harmful than substitutes.

I don’t think that’s a strong argument. Asbestos is quite inert, and that is what makes it so harmful. A fiber will, over time, harm more and more cells.
Im just saying that all it takes is one employee to click onto the wrong URL to breach your apps security. I am not talking about the app itself. You can have all the security implemented the world has to offer and yet you cant get rid of human errors.
Contrary to that, I used Jetbrains IDEs for a decade, or even longer, and recently I have switched to VS Code for my Go and TypeScript work. Sometimes less is more.
> It should be pretty easy to do the same thing in userland with a wasm runtime.

Not easy and certainly not fast.
There still is no replacement for Google Reader. The difference is that there was a community around Reader’s social features. That only really works with wide adoption, and it’s a lot easier for people to adopt a Google product than a random company x one. Today, there are many replacements with the mechanical features of browsing & sync, but the community will never come back.

The other problem was that Google killing Reader was a signal to the broader web to move away from RSS. RSS has kind of limped along since then.
[Sarcasm]
I am sure you will find that the vast majority of criticism is not published in a publication owned by the critic.
> There’s a famous saying in cryptography that says “anyone is capable of building encryption algorithm that they can’t break”

That’s a new one on me (not being in cryptography), but I really like it. Thanks!
Create Beautiful Henna Designs with AI
> “They weren’t allowed to wear hats or gloves of any kind, because the manager said it broke code. There were times, in winter in Wisconsin, when it’s single digits at night,” the person said. “And if they got caught wearing them, they were told to take them off. If they were caught a second time, they were told to go home and then wouldn’t come back.”

>The person added: “They did not treat them like human beings.”

Company run by GoP donors….

Rules for thee not for me.
> Not to mention the issues you create for battery life, network traffic, caching, etc just because you are too lazy to develop properly.

This is a very uncharitable take.

It's because I know how to develop properly that I want to send the repeated content of the site to you just once; the header, topnav, lhs-nav and footer will be cached if JS is enabled. The cost of that JS is less than the common elements anyway!
Oh please not this again.

You think the EU cares about it's citizens rights when it's been trying for the last 3 years to pass the Chat Control law in order to read all your emails, text messages, analyze all your photos and basically treat you as criminal without having any recourse about it?

Is this the kind of rights we are talking about just to be clear?
I realized I was reading too many websites and decided to switch to RSS, only to find out that Google had killed Reader a month earlier.

Years later, I came across Artifact, created by the founders of Instagram, and thought it was an interesting idea. The problem was I was reading its shutdown announcement.

Sometimes I think products are killed way too early. Look at twitch, it boomed after years of stagnation.
It's called flat file storage and it has a number of advantages and disadvantages. I prefer it because it is more robust and performs well, even for large amounts of data, as long as your filesystem is reasonably fast and reliable.

Think maildir vs. mbox/PST/etc. for message storage. I stopped counting the number of times that I have seen Outlook mangle its message database and require a rebuild.

Generally it is not so popular, in part because of the OSes like Windows and macOS which have somewhat lacking filesystem implementations. Git also has performance issues with large repositories on Windows, which need to be worked around by various methods.

Transactions are another limitation as mentioned by the other reply (they are possible to implement on top of "normal" filesystems, but not in a portable way).
Totally agree that knowing if you’re a source of revenue or an expense.

But do your others beat the strategy of predicting (maybe looking at other departments) the characteristics of the next round of layoffs? Things got too Agile and lost the ball. We dramatically overestimated the sophistication of our fourth quintile of users. Product competes with a startup that’s so sexy it’ll operate at a loss until 2027.
> I may be wired weird; I'm also happy when I see signs on stuff saying it's been financed by Local Program X, Subprogram Y, with support from EU Program A, Subprogram B, Function C, blahblah.

Do they also carry the name of the local politician who runs the program? That should raise some eyebrows...
I appreciate the definition, but I'm not understanding your point?

fact-check
: to verify the factual accuracy of

"Our fact-check work is supported in part by a grant from Meta."

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fact-check
All of the tools I use are free software and actively maintained and updated, plus they have very nice logging, so I can diagnose what's happening. I only needed to read the logs because I was young and experimenting with the parts I shouldn't and broke the thing on purpose. However, you can just create a copy of the installation directory to back it up completely.

Again, the tool I gave as an example has integrated configuration snapshots, and if something breaks I can revert to a config 2 seconds or 2 years before, including component versions installed at that time.

To be honest, I probably used that feature at most two times in the last 20 years.

Workplace restrictions something off-limits and I can't tell anything about. The people I gave examples are persons I know and they have no such restrictions in place.
Something I find annoying with automatic transcriptions and summaries, like the one built into Teams, is that they lack the context necessary to properly interpret what's being said. Example if I have a meeting discussing products, abbreviations or systems with "internal" names then it can't discern them or statistically rejects them, replacing them with its best guess for a dictionary word instead. So say we have a long call involving frequent mentions about a measure called pNet pronounced in the meeting "Peenet". Then you end up with a transcription of a bunch of guys having a discussion about penises. Hilarious, the first few times. OK always hilarious, but not so useful.

Being able to set the system prompt for these transcriptions would be very useful. Like "You are a friendly bot transcribing meetings at a software company. Some common terms and abbreviations you'll encounter are...".
iOS also has ads now, thought they're called "Siri suggestions".

The most notable one I saw was a recommendation to download the KFC widget on my iOS home screen. As someone who's never been to KFC, and never used either their website or app, this "suggestion" is indistinguishable from an ad.

Apparently this is triggered due to being "in close proximity" of a KFC (e.g.: due to walking through a mall).

You can disable these ads, but they're enabled by default.
Yeah I realized that was the worst way to go about testing that anyway right after I went to bed last night. If (big stress on if) that was the issue a ferrite bead would be a better way to test it. Based on what you're saying my SWAGs were wildly off. I'd still like to see the sims of it however to see if they provide any illumination on the issue. What makes me think something weird is going on is that it's two out of six wires heating up to absurd degrees. Of the other four two are carrying normal currents and the last two (based on Roman's video) are carrying practically nothing. Buildzoid makes the convincing argument that clearly Nvidia engineers were aware of something like this could happen on the 3090. But, then didn't carry that over to the 4090/5090.
Hmm why are all those companies trying and failing to make "smart" AR glasses.

All they need is to come out with a product that covers billboards in real time.

uBlock Origin for real life.
Thanks, I was unable to find the precinct data — but the 2% aligned closely with state totals.
It seems the main finding is that if you roll out 91 TWh of nuclear in an implausibly straight line manner over the next 5 years, you get better price reductions than if you roll out 51 TWh of renewables but do it so the rollout starts slow and then ramps near the end of that time. (edit, their numbers are weird. If you scale them all up by the same factor it's 100 units of nuclear to 230 units of renewable which is somewhat more reasonable, but other criticisms remain)

Might have been more meaningful if they'd compared two equal cost or even just equal generation scenarios.

But they do seem to find that more renewables means lower prices, with that effect accelerating with deployment scale. Presumably an effect of the merit order pricing jumping whenever the marginal generator is gas and that happening less often as renewables take more of the grid.

They also note that gas was the price setter 92% of the time before.

My economics influenced view is that passing the high cost of gas through to electricity customers is good as it gives them a financial interest in switching the time they use electricity, efficiency and other good things, and encourages the grid to invest in renewables.

This seems massively unpopular with consumers but possibly just because it is in turn unpopular for politicians to pass the cost savings direct to consumers to spend as they please. They much prefer giving tax money to consumers only when they are forced to immediately give it to fossil fuel providers.

edit: I can't get their numbers to add up

> we assume an exponential growth of intermittent renewables to 51,000 MWh (i.e. 82%).

I'm assuming this is from 2022 levels, but those were:

> Overall, generation from renewable energies in 2022 was 233.9 TWh, around 8.5% more than in 2021 (215.5 TWh). At 100.5 TWh, onshore wind generation was about 12.4% higher than in 2021 (89.4 TWh). At 24.7 TWh, generation from offshore wind turbines was 2.9% above the previous year's figure of 24.0 TWh. 55.3 TWh were generated by Solar PV in 2022, 18.7% more than in 2021 (46.6 TWh).

So even assuming they meant 50,000 GWh i.e. 50 TWh that doesn't seem to add up. 2022 had a growth of 25 TWh in variable renewables.

And do they mean exponential from 0 growth in 2022?
Treasury officials: Musk ally 'mistakenly' had power to alter payments system