skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
We're working on a follow up paper now to show similar results with larger models!
I use a combo of Anthropic and OpenAI for now through my bots and my chat UIs and that lets me iterate faster. My hope is once I've done all my testing I could consider moving to local models if it made sense.
Strangely this reminds me of exactly how you would navigate in parts of India before the Internet became ubiquitous.

The steps were roughly: Ask a passerby how to get where you want to go. They will usually confidently describe the steps, even if they didn't speak your language. Cheerfully thank them and proceed to follow the directions. After a block or two, ask a new passerby. Follow their directions for a while and repeat. Never follow the instructions fully. This triangulation served to naturally fill out faulty guidance and hucksters.

Never thought that would one day remind me of programming.
There's a decent chance that his code was seen during the model's training, given that https://github.com/kylekaba/alma_dynamicalmodeling is open (world-wide readable). The OP may have accidentally used GPT as a hashtable to test its rote learning abilities.
Paywalled. But are any of them insurers? (Or coöwned by one?)
A Chinese Internet Phrasebook (2024)
This is the exact opposite of what I was asking for. Instead of quitting my job I want to learn to like my job again. The job doesn't have a responsibility to me, I have a responsibility to get better and part of that is maintaining my career.

Did you even read the post?
As an American impacted by this, I can at least personally say that if anything the fact that you got a job is one of the few upsides in all this.

I don't begrudge a romanian SWE any more than a US one, we're all just trying to get by here, and the fact that global megacorps can do currency/economy arbitrage that they prevent workers from benefiting from while ensuring they have every advantage is by and large not your fault.

It should have been for us as engineers to organize, unionize, or legislate protections if we didn't want this to happen, and despite advocating this to my peers during the boom years, I was constantly rebuffed.

Obviously I put more on the massive companies with the power to dictate global laws and trade practices gleefully jumping at this, but between that and the responsibility I put on my peers/myself to fight against that, I certainly don't put blame on you.
I completely understand their desire to not let it be dug up. Where does that stop? People accidentally throw things out all the time, it's sadly a part of life.
A 25 year old article that might as well have been written yesterday, clearly stood the test of time.
> Passive safety is the art of engineering cars so that when they do crash, the occupants are unharmed.

Judging by the (illegal in Europe) design, passive safety is the only safety Cybertruck has, and the safety of others have absolutely zero importance. Fits with how the rest of the world sees the typical American as well, so maybe not a big shocker.

> What you're asking for, though, is definitionally impossible

Why is it impossible for the car to stop (legally obviously) if it fails to merge, or even hit the curb, instead of continue straight forward like nothing happened?
The first yearly drop in average CPU performance in its 20 years of benchmarks
The author is pretty clear that having more than two modes diminishes the usefulness of the interface. Three modes was complex enough that he redesigned it down.

I've changed the channel tuner when I've reached for the volume knob. If the haptic feedback between the two is clearly different, that will help, no?
Are you aware that RfL is not outsider Rust enthusiasts pushing on the kernel, but rather existing Linux kernel developers wanting to use Rust?
I've heard on the youtubes that "provably false statements" are considered "defamation" in some jurisdictions.

But what do lawyers know?
You assume these people care about the Constitution. They do not. Which means they don't care about America, either.
> It's incredibly far away from doing any significant change in a mature codebase.

I agree with this completely. However the problem that I think the article gets at is still real because junior engineers also can't do significant changes on a mature codebase when they first start out. They used to do the 'easy stuff' which freed the rest of us up to do bigger stuff. But:

1. Companies like mine don't hire juniors anymore

2. With Copilot I can be so much more productive that I don't need juniors to do "the easy stuff" because Copilot can easily do that in 1/1000th the time a junior would.

3. So now who is going to train those juniors to get to the level where we need them to be to make those "significant changes"?
I feel like FSD has been "getting there" since before even Tesla started marketing it. I remember Google's early self driving cars and everyone thought they were only a few years away from being practical.

I think FSD definitely has utility, but not in the hands of laypeople. There are still far too many edge cases that it just doesn't handle well, and your average person can't be trusted to stay alert and attentive while using a feature so heavily marketed as not needing either of these things.
And my guess is there's a touch of ideology to this person that questioning Tesla and FSD's fundamental safety would hurt. "I screwed up" does a lot less to cause cognitive dissonance than "Something I believe is wrong"

There's a lot of possible flavors to that ideology, it COULD be right wing political affinity, but it also could be a belief that technology is superior to human judgement, or that self driving cars are the future, or it could just be that spending 6 figures on an ugly pickup wasn't a waste of money.
Omg, pet medicines! I wound up getting several when I went to India. Only edit I had to make was to the dose, since they were packaged for people.
Because of the nature of my job I do many in-person interviews
I agree. I don't want a "smart" knob. I'm dreading going car shopping sometime this next year. I anticipate having to rule out a large pool of cars to keep my controls navigable without looking.
I'm not sure that's relevant or comparable when there's no baseline for what terrorist means.

There are lots of reasons people bomb cars. I would bet most of those organizations (1+ individuals) would prefer to blow up planes full of specific targets over specific targets.
https://archive.is/3o6Nf
All RTX xx60 cards are really bad value propositions, though (especially in comparison to the xx80 series cards).

If the 4060 was the 3080-for-400USD that everyone actually wants, that'd be a different story. Fortunately, its nonexistence is a major contributor to why the B580 can even be a viable GPU for Intel to produce in the first place.
There are upsides, definitely. For slow moving traffic FSD can remove so much of the tedium of matching speed, spacing, or stop-and-go.

I like the level 1 to level 3 features: Lane keeping, emergency braking (when there's something there), adaptive speed control, etc. But a new minivan has all those too.

For long highway driving it does remove 99% of the things I hate, but there's 1% of the time it just annoys the hell out of me, and it tarnishes the whole experience.
I don't think you should feel bad. It's a bit like feeling guilty because it's raining where you are while somewhere else in the world people are suffering a famine due to lack of rainfall.

The only difference is that you have zero control over the weather and very nearly zero control over corporate hiring decisions.
> what FSD is for

Hype & Marketing
> I'm thinking there's going to have to be some other breakthrough or something other than LLM's.

We actually _need_ a breakthrough for the promises to materialize, otherwise we will have yet another AI Winter.

Even though there seems to be some emergent behavior (some evidence that LLMs can, for example, create an internal chess representation by themselves when asked to play), that's not enough. We'll end up with diminishing returns. Investors will get bored of waiting and this whole thing comes crashing down.

We'll get an useful too in our toolbox, as we do at every AI cycle.
The page uses "our" and "we" a bunch of times, but doesn't say who this "we" is. The implication from the "Contact" page seems to be that this is some "Rust for Linux" group that may or may not be well defined.

Which is fine, but then the document also doesn't cite most of the things it states, and isn't always clear on what's established fact/standard and what's this group's opinion. For eg.

> Should maintainers treat Rust code up to the same standards?

> Ideally, and eventually, yes. However, when they are starting out, not necessarily.

Sections like this have no indicator for whether this is opinion they are stating, an argument they're presenting, or an already-decided kernel policy that they're citing.

---

> On the costs side, [...] most Rust language features we used were stabilized

The fact that this has to be specified - and still qualified with "most" - is a big part of the problem with this.
1)It's not, it's 9-10. 2)This isn't a "feature article."

Maybe save judgement on journalists until you can parse 5th-grade-reading-level sentences correctly.
this is so funny to read... the author should come to America, see how we do it :)
1Password just keeps going farther off the rails, doesn't it.
Technomancer. AI is far more like the undead than like a deity, at least for now.
Eventually, there are going to be more experienced Rust developers than there are experienced C developers.
The sad thing about all of this is that any position you take on this matter, becomes a sort of call to a battle of wits between very cunning fighters that protect their intellectual terf. At least when Baboons get tribal, they are fighting over blood and soil.
"we" is another word for "the people building the systems living on the web"

Once, "we" come up with the answer we are going to build based on the newly defined assumptions.

Here is what critically re-examining everything means: Do i really need to have a comment section? And if I do, shall I be the one responsible for managing it's technical infrastructure? The answer could be to use an off-the-shelf solution in your particular story. When you pivot to the side of the off-the-shelf solution developers who actually needs to do the spam filtering, then answers may differ, as will assumptions.

Edit: What are your thoughts of the mechanism hacker news have used to reduce bot comments?
Just realized that the Mixture of Million Experts paper from last year is similar in some respects to this tiny pointers idea
Please tell someone I'm tired of my wallpaper reverting to the default animated one when I disconnect my external monitor with the lid closed. Further data point: I use the solid color background feature.
I’m waiting until this summer with the M4 Ultra Studio.
>Indeed, I didn't like the dishonesty there. There's probably many situations where you're absolutely right. It's just that my hatred for this industry is too strong to grant them any quarter even when they're technically in the right.

You know what's arguably worse than insurance companies? Racists. So when there's a mysterious flu coming out of China and racists are latching onto it as a way to hate on Chinese people (eg. "China flu"), we better downplay it[1] so we don't give them any rhetorical ammo.

[1] https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/coronavirus-outbreak-01-2...

>there's a reason the staff deemed it worth pulling her from surgery [...]

Sounds like you're giving infinite charity to the doctor/staff and not allowing for any possibility that any sort of mistake on their end. Is this based off of any facts, or your "hatred for this industry is too strong to grant them any quarter even when they're technically in the right"?
> and need things like soft deletion and versioning. Relational databases come to a crawl with that need.

Lol. No relational database slows to a crawl on `is_deleted=true` or versioning

In general so far not a single claim by NoSQL databases has been shown to be true. Except KV databases, as they have their own uses
Something tells me that Liz Cook is not a "him"
RustRover and PyCharm keep my jetbrains subscription going. The AI assistant on pandas APIs is a godsend.
This sounds kind of like a majority attack with blockchains. If most of the government officials are against a court order, seems like it just won't happen i.e. even steps 3 and 4.

Conversely, presumably this is by design since a rogue judge could issue a bad court order and presumably there are mechanisms to deal with these that perhaps involve a large enough quorum disagreeing with and ignoring it.
There were also a lot of times mentioned that current maintainers are getting old. Rust people might, with time, take over... being younger and all.
Primarily, the strategy to ignore all prior laws, court rulings, and the constitution itself with the permission of a slim majority of congress.
is clojure boring yet? Im considering using it for a web app.
I got the impression from somewhere that they used the simplest machine learning techniques (just fitting regressions to data), but that it was "the 'what' that they decided to fit" that was the secret sauce.
That would be relevant if the margins on GPUs weren’t astronomical.
nah. It's not funding. It's more a side effect of japans economic problems.
No reason for this post to be flagged other than conservatives not being happy for the coup being called out.
Yeah, right now I'm running a tower PC (Intel Core i9-11900K, 64GB Ram) with Unraid as my local "app server". I want to play with Proxmox (for professional and mostly fun reasons) though. Someday I'd like a rack in my basement as my homelab stuff has overgrown the space it's in and I'm going to need to add a new 12-bay Synology (on top of 2x12-bay) soon since I'm running out of space again. For now I've been sticking with consumer/prosumer equipment but my needs are slowly outstripping that I think.
That seems a bit incredible because it suggests that they would be denying 100% of their claims. If they're going to start lying about a form being filled out correctly in one instance, why ever stop? They can just keep lying forever on all claims.

I've had weird experiences online arguing (about shoplifting, as it happened) with people (I assume teenagers) on Discord who seemed to have a genuine belief that buying insurance was a magic positive-sum process for dealing with damages. They hadn't/didn't make the link that the insurer pays out approximately what they take in from premiums. That experience applied to medical insurance leaves me with a strong suspicion that UHC gets a lot of hate because they are the cheap option and people haven't cottoned on to the sad reality that if they want their claims paid out they can't go with the provider that is cheap because it denies a lot of claims. UHC's margins are there but don't seem to be that impressive. It wouldn't be surprising if they have to push back fairly hard or become insufficiently profitable.
Unless you have a crystal ball there is nothing that can give you certainty that will continue at the same or better rate. I’m not sure why you took the second half of the comment more seriously than the first.
That seems like a very poor chassis design on the part of the NVR manufacturer. The average modern 3.5" high capacity HDD doesn't generate that much heat. Even 'datacenter' HGST drives average around 5.5W and will top out at 7.8W TDP under maximum stress. Designing a case that uses relatively low rpm, quiet, 120 or 140mm 12VDC fans to pull air through it and cool six or eight hard drives isn't that difficult. In a midtower desktop PC case set up as a NAS with a low wattage CPU, used as a NAS, a single 140mm fan at the rear sucking air from front-to-back is often quite enough to cool eight 3.5" HDD.

But equipment designers keep trying to stuff things into spaces that are too small and use inadequate ventilation.
I feel this way too. It was scary the first couple weeks, but I'm glad I gave it more of a chance. Over time you learn when to trust it and what situations it you need to take over, and then it just becomes a normal part of driving with less stress on me while my brain energy is spent looking for problems instead of keeping up with traffic or in the lane.

Really a human + AI hybrid experience.
VPN:

> As a result, users must rely on their provider’s pinky-promise that none of their data is logged. Yet even a provider that keeps true to its promise can suffer a security breach and be compromised.

2-Party Relay:

> This splits “who you are” from “what you do”, meaning neither party can tie your identity to your browsing.

Ok, but... don't users have to reply on their provider’s pinky-promise that the two parties won't cooperate with each other and share their separate data, thereby connecting the dots? After all, the two parties are already cooperating to an extent, so why can't they cooperate even more, either voluntarily or at the command of some hostile government?
1Password Partners with RedBull Racing
Why are you assuming that all countries don't have a CFPB equivalent? Do they also not have parliaments that make laws since they do not have a US Congress?
Elon Musk implies the US Government does not use SQL
Location: Germany (Dusseldorf)

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: React, Next.js, TypeScript, Mantine UI, Tailwind CSS, shadcn, Material UI, Bootstrap, Node.js, Express, PostgreSQL, various auth solutions (Supabase Auth, Auth0, Firebase Auth etc.), Golang, Kubernetes, AWS, Swift, Unity, various analytics and monitoring solutions (Prometheus, Grafana, Pendo etc.), OpenAI API, AI agents.

Résumé/CV:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UVHNlrDhIZwHV2N0XmGhOluLguZ...

Email: opudrovs@gmail.com

Available for remote work worldwide, very flexible across time zones. Looking for permanent or contract positions.

Hi! I’m Olga, an experienced software engineer looking for frontend or fullstack projects.

I have experience building greenfield projects and complex features that “just work,” as well as diving into complex legacy codebases, fixing “unfixable” bugs, and performing major refactoring.

In addition to React/Next.js and Node/Express.js development, I also have experience with cloud-native workflows (Golang + Kubernetes), OpenAI API integration and agentic workflows, native iOS development, and game development. Thanks to my multi-platform experience, I can help you port large products across different platforms.

LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/olga-pudrovska/

My contributions to Weave GitOps (React/Golang Kubernetes dashboard project):

https://github.com/weaveworks/weave-gitops/commits?author=op...

https://github.com/weaveworks/weave-gitops-enterprise/commit...

My latest fullstack code sample:
https://github.com/opudrovs/react-api-data-sample/

Frontend: React/Next.js/TypeScript/Mantine UI/Tailwind CSS
Backend: Node.js/Express/TypeScript/PostgreSQL/Supabase Auth

For this sample, I researched the most popular modern UI frameworks and picked Mantine and Tailwind CSS as the winners. It was an interesting engineering challenge to make Mantine UI and Tailwind CSS work well together in a Next.js app. Additionally, the whole project is dockerized, allowing you to spin up the frontend, backend, and a PostgreSQL database seeded with test data with a single command. (Please see the Readme file for instructions on how to run the project and for a video demo.)
Hilarious because I watched this while my code was compiling.
> a book somewhere

Black Swan by Nassim Taleb?
Come on, you can't say interesting things like and not elaborate a little bit.
I hope you guys got rid of your teslas. Preferably under press. They are a danger to people around you.
SEEKING WORK

Location: Germany (Dusseldorf)

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: React, Next.js, TypeScript, Mantine UI, Tailwind CSS, shadcn, Material UI, Bootstrap, Node.js, Express, PostgreSQL, various auth solutions (Supabase Auth, Auth0, Firebase Auth etc.), Golang, Kubernetes, AWS, Swift, Unity, various analytics and monitoring solutions (Prometheus, Grafana, Pendo etc.), OpenAI API, AI agents.

Résumé/CV:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UVHNlrDhIZwHV2N0XmGhOluLguZ...

Email: opudrovs@gmail.com

Available for remote work worldwide, very flexible across time zones. Looking for permanent or contract positions.

Hi! I’m Olga, an experienced software engineer looking for frontend or fullstack projects.

I have experience building greenfield projects and complex features that “just work,” as well as diving into complex legacy codebases, fixing “unfixable” bugs, and performing major refactoring.

In addition to React/Next.js and Node/Express.js development, I also have experience with cloud-native workflows (Golang + Kubernetes), OpenAI API integration and agentic workflows, native iOS development, and game development. Thanks to my multi-platform experience, I can help you port large products across different platforms.

LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/olga-pudrovska/

My contributions to Weave GitOps (React/Golang Kubernetes dashboard project):

https://github.com/weaveworks/weave-gitops/commits?author=op...

https://github.com/weaveworks/weave-gitops-enterprise/commit...

My latest fullstack code sample:
https://github.com/opudrovs/react-api-data-sample/

Frontend: React/Next.js/TypeScript/Mantine UI/Tailwind CSS
Backend: Node.js/Express/TypeScript/PostgreSQL/Supabase Auth

For this sample, I researched the most popular modern UI frameworks and picked Mantine and Tailwind CSS as the winners. It was an interesting engineering challenge to make Mantine UI and Tailwind CSS work well together in a Next.js app. Additionally, the whole project is dockerized, allowing you to spin up the frontend, backend, and a PostgreSQL database seeded with test data with a single command. (Please see the Readme file for instructions on how to run the project and for a video demo.)
Yes, Orwell is one of the few who seemed to have a kind of immunity to this! At least in part.
Ah interesting, I didn't know Waterfox used DNS over Oblivious HTTP! (I used to run an Oblivious HTTP proxy)

> Unless I’m mistaken, you’re both controlling the client software (closed source) and the first relay?

The client software is here: https://github.com/Sovereign-Engineering/obscuravpn-client, we also plan to make reproducible builds of our apps. In fact, I previously led the effort to revamp Bitcoin Core’s reproducible builds system to be [bootstrappable](https://bootstrappable.org/), work that is [referenced by the Tor project](https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser-b...).
> The USA did quite well in applied research before the federal government became the dominant source of funds.

For my own curiosity, when did that transition occur?
Pretty good list on Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_power_cable#Operatio...
> The implication from the "Contact" page seems to be that this is some "Rust for Linux" group that may or may not be well defined.

It says:

> For other matters, please feel free to contact the maintainers via email.

Which links to https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainers.html#rust which has a list of people.

There is also https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/blob/rust-next/MAINT... which is the in-tree documentation of who maintainers are.

> The fact that this has to be specified - and still qualified with "most" - is a big part of the problem with this.

For a very long time, linux wouldn't even compile with clang, becuase they use gcc extensions. These are effectively the same idea as nightly features. The kernel has never used standard C. Nowadays clang has enough support and keeps it going.

I agree with you that I personally would much prefer that they were on 100% stable Rust, but the Linux folks in general are way more fine with depending on specific versions for the build.