skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Of course nobody is 100% above it, it happens, to be blindly partisan for someone or something and not quite honest to oneself.

As Orwell described it https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwel...

But doing it all the time? No. It's something to overcome. None of us may be perfectly non-partisan and intellectually honest all the time, of course, but there are still two general directions: giving in to that, and wading out of it.

To be super mean about it, because that's how I feel about it in my heart of hearts: insofar people were just an extension with a tribe they identify with, they could be replaced by another member of that tribe. And if every member in that tribe had no content and only a reference to the tribe, the whole thing could get garbage collected.

There's a real mechanism where we don't even feel the need to examine, much less justify, things we claim or support just because we feel we're with the in-group. As in, I don't know what I'm talking about or what it means, I just need to know that it's approved by those with the biggest stick, or that "history will judge me correct" or anything like that. But IF I can argue the point on my own, what do I care that others agree? And if I can't, what does it help me?

Calling that out isn't necessarily "getting mad at it" tho, it's just calling it out. Anyone who makes a podcast or gets behind any other type of podium, even this comment, is up for scrutiny. But I'd agree that we shouldn't get self-righteous about it. As in, I criticize this for being partisan because being partisan is thoughtless, but not because I never do it, and also because I want "my own" to criticize me in the same way, where applicable.

And yes, it's much easier to see how crude it is, how gross to cloak something in supposed wisdom, nuance or other good things when it's really just partisan hackery (when the rationalization came after the decision to be loyal no matter what), when others do it with something we disagree with. We overlook it constantly when people do it in service of what we think is good, and the blind spots when we ourselves do it are giant. But that just means more work cut out for us :P
Is there an advantage on going 2nm given the costs? Maybe somebody can clearly answer this here on HN, I love this subject!

It's interesting how the whole valuation of TSMC(and some from NVidia) are aligned by their current advantage on the 3nm process.

Intel on 18A is literally TSMC's 3nm process + backside power delivery, which means more power efficiency, performance also less heat.

It's definitely what they need to get them back into the processor game and beat everybody, maybe we will see Apple doing designs with the Intel factory before 2030?

Hope they don't fail their deadlines: summer this year to be producing 18A, and 2026 mass production.
This is so incredibly cool... ;-)))
Will Flatpac work without any trouble on Ubuntu in the future?
I'm being picky here, but I don't think you portray an fair view of Kuhn's epistemology here.

Kuhn does not define a value-scale of both methods, on the contrary, he merely introduces the concept of different researchs: one being critical (developing new paradigms) and one being accumulating (further refining existing paradigms).

He also hints to the almost inevitably organic interactions between the two, such that critical research naturally evolves from a pragmatic need to express things simply from a new paradigm when the old one becomes too clumsy for a use case.

This is what happened in your example as well. Copernic (and later Galileo) did not invent heliocentrism out of the blue, the theory around it existed since antic Greece. It is even arguably the Renaissance, leading metaphysicists to revisit ancien texts, that spurred the idea to Copernic to consider it. But ultimately the need for the new paradigm was pushed by the need to revisit the calendar, which was drifting, and the difficulty to do it in a geocentric world, where you have to take planet retrocession into account.
Responding to your edit: It is absolutely and objectively unconstitutional according to the letter of the constitution, no matter what Random Economics Professor might say. Whether anyone will care is a different discussion entirely.
There is no first amendment right to be on Twitter (or any other privately owned service). That said, Musk doesn't actually care about free speech in general. He cares about his own free speech and the speech of those that agree with him.
This. I'm sorry for that guy but that is great news!
That sounds so much nicer than that horrific hack in the OP.
> RAID1 has been fine for years

It's never been RAID1 it's the odness of the pid decides which disk to read from.
The first part of the article explains the pattern, where a nickname becomes a patronymic surname, using familiar examples.

This sets up the main point, which is that the pattern holds so reliably that when you meet a patronymic surname you can often infer the existence of a nickname, even when it's one you don't recongize.

Hence the title.
> I also don't think "Many people would gladly pay for..." has been proven in the marketplace. If anything, the success of Ryanair, Easyjet and co has resoundingly proven that people will gladly suffer less spacious seating if it means paying less.

Given the number of 7 hour flights I could find, I really don't think that proves anything except maybe people will pay more.
magic_enum addresses your issue but will absolutely kill compile time on a large project due to recursive template instantiation.
I've said it as a joke many times that PostgreSQL can be a better NoSQL database than many actual NoSQL databases just by creating a (text, JSONB) table.

You can do actual searches inside the JSON, index the table with JSONB contents etc. Things that became available in MongoDB very very late.
I think the current US administration significantly undermines the framing of democracy versus authoritarianism. As much as Dario may want to push alternative narratives, most AI practitioners—who have no financial ties to OpenAI or Anthropic—likely view this as an attempt to squash competition from open weight models.
These system work by taking a list of tokens (basically words) and the "model" and send that to a function which returns one new token.

You add that new token to the list of tokens.

Repeat with the new list of tokens.

That's how these systems work. We don't know exactly how the model works (wrt input tokens) but even that is a simplification. It's not magic. Just maths that's too complex to understand trivially.
Oh, wow. Requiring proof now.

First, I don't keep bookmarks of everything I read, second I can't record conversations I've had with people owning cars I'm interested in and store them in publicly accessible places.

I understand that we will not be able to meet somewhere in the middle. Also, I'm not someone who'd leave personal opinions and experiences to appease and please someone.

So, have a nice day. Hope your cars never break down and give you infinite joy.
Sure it does.

If you have demand for 10,000 passengers to be transported on a route daily, and a plane carries 200 people, you would need 50 trips. If the round trip is 4 hours, you could do 6 trips per plane and you'd need 9 planes to service the route.

If the round trip time is 8 hours, you could only do 3 trips per day and you'd need 17 planes.
Some people's pets will shit right at centre of office. Or in kitchen... Shit then gets smeared everywhere with paper towels!
Maybe a simple cladding designed to attach the solar panel? The costs start adding up quickly though.
The name change serves zero purpose and is nothing more than political theater.
The reason is because his critics have nothing substantial to criticize him about. Name-calling is an admission that you got nothing.
Passwords suck a lot. Can passkeys fix that?
It's serverless only in that there's a whole different organization at Meta handling the (monolith) hosting on actual hardware.

By that definition, you could argue Amazon's detail page is "serverless".
I dont believe they are doing a good job , my thought process is that my platform would focus more on shared interests rather than these core values
I think it is easy enough to be a potential footgun [0]:

struct A { A(A*);};

struct B {
A a1;
A a2;
};

void f()
{
B b{.a1 = A(nullptr), .a2 = A(&b.a1) };
}

[0] https://godbolt.org/z/cGaxzh17T
A walk-through I filmed of the warehouse: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL8QBvXvGjQ
DuckDB is the best TPC data generator
Not to mention DPC latency for us Windows customers
Please report back with findings! Wishing you an enjoyable experiment. People are tricky.
Deep true words. I'm sorry for the author but thx for the article!
they did it to RAID and the Inexpensive did completely disappear
It already exists. It's called Ardour. Paul, the main developer is quite active on HN.
You can already do this without changing the SQL language spec. If you really care about the things you say, follow the other comments and make the first element special which is changed much less frequently.
But at a totally different quant, you're crazy if you think you can run the entire R1 model on a single 4090, come on man. Apples and oranges.
The current correctly rounded libraries work well with 32-bit float, but only provably produce correct rounding with 64-bit float in some cases. It turns out it's rather difficult to prove that you will produce a correctly rounded result in all cases, even if you have an algorithm that works. That means that each of these libraries has only a sunset of operations.
The seats are on rails. Spacing is factory adjustable. It's just that air fare paperclipping isn't as aggressive on regional flights.
> The Rust designers might have known that other memory-safe programming languages had existed, but certainly they were not familiar with them.

Graydon is incredibly knowledgeable about programming languages.

Just because you have certain opinions about language design does not mean others do not know things.

Speaking of knowing history, Ada implements STEELMAN, not IRONMAN.
Care to share a link to the fermentation forum?
Not the tech world generally. Silicon valley culture specifically, but SV is hardly the entire tech world.
I'm skeptical how much charges for check-in have to do with it. People traveling on business almost universally don't want the time overhead (and risk of delayed luggage) associated with checking bags even though they could expense it or often get free checked bags through status anyway.
Avian flu in America is a political problem and a health threat
But is not, in any sense of the term, a DAW.
https://archive.ph/85XEe
Runs is an overstatement though. With 4 tokens/second you can't use it on production.
Have written a lot of code over ~35 years. Not a fan of trailing commas in any language I've used.
> Vance added that leaders in Europe should especially "look to this new frontier with optimism, rather than trepidation". His comments appear to put him at odds with French President Emmanuel Macron, who defended the need for further regulation.

The difference in mentality is rather interesting. Instead of embracing new technologies, the EU in large is already looking for ways to smother their development with bureaucracy and restrictions. How are they ever hoping to come out on top?
Reasons I can think of:

- Most people want cheap flights over everything else, speed is expensive

- The flight time only has a limited relative impact on the overall travel time. Time to get in and out of the airport, security, border controls, boarding, taxiing, etc... often take longer than the flight itself.

- For passengers who are ready to pay more, you can always offer more comfort. The advantage with comfort is that you can divide the plane into classes, it is highly modular. Faster requires an entirely new plane design just for those who can afford it.

- Arguably, comfort is more valuable than the kind of speed improvement we can get. For example, if you sleep better on the plane, that's less sleep you will need at your destination, saving you time overall. If you can work on the plane, that's also time you don't have to spend working at some other time.
Plenty of ways to waste time at the office as well.
Empowerment and Constraints – Ant Murphy
I really don't see the point of this compared to Postgres' native JSON support.

And with things like this in the source https://github.com/microsoft/documentdb/blob/a0c44348fb473da...

I'd definitely stay away from it.
Or people on site talking with each other and not noticing the raised hand of someone online.

All this can be mitigated with processes, but it takes conscious work to keep it up.
It's actually a little shocking to be confronted this directly with how much the constitution really only holds together assuming good faith behavior from the POTUS.

"A republic, if you can keep it" indeed
They may be too expensive for ML (or really not pareto-optimal for ML), but people use GPUs for a lot of things.
I don't understand, how can they use AI to preserve their culture when AI was never a part of it ?
JACK Audio Connection Kit is generally the way to go on Linux. Arch wiki has a page on "Professional Audio" with more detail for the curious.
If I had to stop using services or buying products every time they advocate for something or do some change I disagree with I would have to live in a cabin in the woods.
One of your main issues is describing art and music as “content”.

Ableton Live at least is a phenomenally powerful tool for arranging and recording music in a way that is completely elastic and transformative. I’ve been using it for over twenty years to make records and every time I’ve wanted it to do more, somehow those features have been magically added on every version without me having to ask.

The thing with any tool is that one has to know what result one wants rather than focussing on the method.

Your post reads like you should maybe think about doing creative things other than music. And I’m sure we’d be all ears for the improved DAW that you never got round to writing yet.

Apple also made that tool for six-year-olds and their guitars. It’s called GarageBand. Some of those six-year-olds have made albums with it.
I'm actually shocked in such a media and marketing driven society that absolutely, nobody brings up the fact that the Tesla brand has been completely destroyed in the US and EU.

Companies simply do not survive this in the long run unless very specific inelastic demand (I'm thinking bp oil spill as the only example) exists, and even then BP wasn't as international or charged or so ... Nazi.

Tesla is musk. Musk is a Nazi. Musk was a progressive environmental future in the previous media construction.

That radical shift means no brand, no customers. How many people want to drive a car that basically has a swastika on it? 4% of the population?

On top of this, musks absent leadership since the model Y, in addition to Tesla's general problems getting new designs out the door, and his marketing ignorance in the good days, means Tesla has no badge diversification a luxury marque, no extensive model diversity for all the markets of the world, no cabin options for their extreme design, no trims and body style variations.

It's just the 3 and Y basically.

Tesla should have bought another car company to gain engineer, design, oem relationships, and manufacturing capacity.

Too late. Tesla is now a pump and dump scheme, musk wants his 60 billion that Delaware is holding up and then he'll sell off just like the board is doing now.

China will seize teskas assets on a whim from a trade war or a hot war with Taiwan.

The energy sector is not one I look forward to, Tesla doesn't have any advantage in battery packaging or battery technology("battery day" is now officially a dud), and lfp lmfp and sodium ion chemistries are far more suited to grid storage and home storage.

We all know AI driving at Q4 isnt happening under musk. It's a long slog and musk fires software teams too quickly, because he treats them like hardware. That's basically all the hype.
This reads like it has been written by AI for someone who really wishes for an RTO.

Who the hell enjoys office snacks?
The mental and physical cost of worrying about a few cents isn't worth it.
If you’re trying to build a team from scratch, you probably want to hire devs with relevant experience.

But I think it’s a sign of an unhealthy or immature team if it is unable to onboard and train new developers.

You are right that a new developer could easily make a lot of mistakes, but it is the responsibility of the senior developers on the team to give feedback and review the code of less experienced members.
Is it because of wind ?
Isn’t 4 tps good enough for local use by a single user, which is the point of a personal AI computer?
EU launches initiative to mobilise €200B of investment in AI
This illustrates beautifully how stupid labeling ideas stupid is.

To know that that an idea or approach is fundamentally stupid and unsalvageable requires a grasp of the world that humans may simply not have access to. It seems unthinkably rare to me.
Florence bans key boxes, a symbol of overtourism
Flatpak works fine with Ubuntu, it's just not enabled/installed by default. The Flatpak website has some instructions which I just tested successfully:

https://flatpak.org/setup/Ubuntu
The dark art is to massively overprovision hardware.
I read that and my mind filled in "...from outer space?"
Amazing. All of this truly wild, impressive technology and some of the absolute best engineers in the world, just to shove more ads in people's eyeballs. Sigh.
At one point I believe DSL used Kdrive which has a slightly different DDX and driver structure but the same DIX.
Sam Altman tells Elon Musk that OpenAI isn't for sale
What is "they"? Are you saying transformer architecture somehow is biased towards English? Or are you saying that existing LLMs have that bias?

The only way this project is going to make sense will be to train it fresh on text in the language to be preserved, in order to avoid accidentally corrupting your model with English. If it's trained fresh on only target language content, I'm not sure how we can possibly generalize from the whole-internet models that you're familiar with.
It is out of stock, but even then I would have zero interest in supporting someone (trigger warning) blatantly fascist:

https://holodomormuseum.org.ua/en/propaganda/artemy-lebedev-...
I fully agree with you that effecting "better"/more democratic politics abroad via trade has a poor track record (EU buying Russian gas would be another example).

But answer honestly: Do you think that the US/Europe shaped their trade policies in a way that maximized foreign political improvement (especially pre-Crimea)? Because to me, that sounds almost comically self-delusional: We did not try to foster democracy when trading with Russia/China-- we traded to get stuff for cheap.

Looking at GDP development, this was very effective: Yes China grew more wealthy as well, but current trends are not looking like Chinese real wages will ever catch up to US levels, even in the next several decades...

I honestly believe that the US has profitted immensely from trade with China-- it would be insane to try to avoid this (and hold on to domestic industry) from a perspective of how it affected the average American citizen.
Anchoreum: A game for learning CSS anchor positioning
Because it's theoretical math and if you translate it to computer code it might actually be slower.
My question is why not just have a desktop daw implement rpc on their daemon to work collaboratively natively instead of being sandboxed in a browser? Or does this already exist?
If it is good enough for OpenBSD it is good enough for me.
I think this takes too much of a sort of top-down approach. Many broad statements are made about what LLMs are and aren't - some positive, some negative, some well-substantiated, some less so - when there needs to be a greater focus on fundamental knowledge of their inner workings and (im)practical uses.

The title being a question implies it will teach you to answer the question yourself. But it feels more like you're expected to enter with the belief that they're oracles, and this is here to convince you they're bullshit machines.

I don't care which one it is! It doesn't matter if we call what they do logical reasoning or not, because either way it doesn't help to give a full understanding of their actual capabilities.

Much of the language surrounding this course makes me think the intention is a grounded view. If that is the case though, this misses the mark. Rather than educate on the reality of the situation, I fear the use of it would only exacerbate the principles-first approach seen all too often in discussion around AI. More accurate principles than most perhaps, but principles nonetheless.
> Swearing to hate my wife’s [numerous, and often for trivial reasons] enemies has made me a better, more rounded person. Not only does it give me a benchmark for measuring my loyalty to her, but it’s made me more resolute in my own beliefs. Because all the spiting and snubbing of her foes has shown me how much colder I could be to the people I already didn’t like.

Nice that he believes(?) it worked out well for him.

But I've know people who married enemy-collecting spouses - and that usually wasn't so happy. Plus, if the marriage hits a rocky patch, be ready for a really ugly divorce.
I tried running the 8B model on my 8GB M2 Macbook Air through Ollama and it was awful.
It took ages to do anything and the responses were bad at best.
you could set up rgb lighting to highlight the sections pretty easily on any decent keyboard I think.
In Sweden it shows both. "Mexikanska Golfen(Amerikanska Golfen)"
>without pesticides we'll probably all perish from malnutrition within a year or two,

I have my doubts on this. The same is true for the supposed magic of nitrogen fertilizers.
Boston isn't a United hub but I can get to most places with a fairly reasonable flight option from there. The main exceptions are Raleigh (which is short enough that I don't care much) and London for which I change planes rather than take a BA non-stop.
> If he decides tomorrow to start calling Canada "Beaverland," will all our maps change again?

The guy got enough votes without needing to promise to do this as well.
I had that reaction when I first saw the French name for NATO and thought it was an accidental mirror image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NATO_OTAN_landscape_logo....

("Organisation du traité de l'Atlantique nord")
Works great for the federal government, too.
> That looks like expert level mental gymnastics detached from the reality.

Bro, I literally used to be homeless for a while many years ago. Believe me, I know how reality looks like, and there was nothing more frustrating than finding out, whoops, you don't have the 20 fucking cents to buy the groceries you wanted because they decided to raise the price of butter over night. Price reductions are announced in ads all the time, but price hikes? You can only find that out when you are in the store but then it may be too late and you gotta reschedule what you buy at a moment's notice.

Grocery prices must be stable and not subject to arbitrary games.