skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
as a hypothetical, if the prez defined 'proper security clearance' as opening up http (unencrypted) access and clicking OKAY on the website (or many with all this data), allowable to anybody on the internet to access said data.. would you be okay that it was happening?

my point is that "proper security clearance" is subjective, and as we are observing, (from what i read the other day) "clearance" is given to folks who would have never made passing the clearance checks in the very recent past (lol like a few weeks ago recent past).

is it all lawful? time will tell, and thats what EFF and others will try to decide - and good luck if any of that data is ever properly disposed of and not benefited from (aka insider knowledge).
I'm honestly willing to chalk a big part of the increased fatalities up to their awful UI/UX, that incessantly draws the attention away from the road to do even minor things (adjust mirrors, windshield wipers, etc)
> Calling it attempted murder says a lot about the cops

That they’re operating at a high-trust setting in a high-stakes context, yes. The flip side is more Uvaldes, where everyone is waiting for paperwork or their balls to drop before bothering with doing something productive.
Say what you want but $48k gets you nothing compared to $70k+ straight out of school with the possibility of RSUs and the ilk
not sure you got the memo but we no longer have neither working legislative nor judiciary branch of government so that’d be a moot
Didn't they just fail payroll because of the frozen payments from USAID which they said they weren't receiving?
My boss has a few neighbors who are Nvidia and former Nvidia employees and they're all driving their shiny, fancy sports cars and such and living the high life thanks to the stock they got. It doesn't surprise me they're having churn and / or retiring cutting in to their workforce. Probably not enough to be substantial, but enough to count for something.
I'm not sure it takes more than a shift, though. There aren't 0 people in training to be a doctor, but we have a shortage for sure and it causes huge problems.
Indeed, I thought awhile about a way to rephrase that, and it's really just media shaping the perceptions about such. Being in an aircrash seems like a top national nightmare, so 9/11 was super effective in catching our attention.
> a single, often anonymous, phone call should not directly and immediately result in an armed assault on an address

It wasn’t anonymous. The teenager impersonated an officer.
People usually need to put food on their tables.
You meant Java applets perhaps? Java is still write-once run-anywhere if you stick with its APIs.
It's trying to point out the common argument that's passed to each command: `jj restore` with no arguments is virtually the same as `jj abandon`, but in practice that means that `jj restore` tends to be called with a file as an argument, and `jj abandon` gets called with a revision (which he's calling edit here). It is in fact a node. The arrows are still just relationships between nodes.

> if I'm understanding it right, turns r --[edit3]--> q --[edit2]--> p into r --[edit3]--> p.

You are right with the outcome but wrong about why. `jj abandon -r q` would turn `r --> q --> p` into `r --> p`, but you're passing the node as the argument (r is for revision) not the edge.

Hilariously, I am literally working on writing version 2 of my tutorial right now, and I'm literally talking about `jj abandon`. What do you think about this? It cuts off where I literally am right now: https://gist.github.com/steveklabnik/71165f9ff5e13b1e95902c4...
I came here to say this. Kubernetes is an ecosystem that represents a better way of running production workloads at scale for many orgs. People already use Kubernetes for VMs, and various different container runtimes are used by different cloud providers. If WASM does replace containers (unclear to me), Kubernetes would just support WASM, and stay largely similar.
> with a convoluted UI from the 90s/2000s

Some of us love this UI.
For the conceivable future, people will still need their lights to work and their toilets to flush. I would hope it's worth it because it's a lot better than the alternative.
Ask the AI for what exactly? Factual information? That gets very low protection from a copyright point of view, especially when separate random answers by the AI will routinely show completely different rephrasings of the AI's response - implying that it can generalize well beyond the "expression" contained in any single answer, and effectively reference the underlying facts.
Never is a strong word to toss around with the current administration.

There's been a big push to make NOAA go away so that private companies like AccuWeather be the one everyone turns to for their data. AccuWeather has been pushing for this for a long time--even before Trump's first term. We'll see how big their donations are perceived by how gutted NOAA becomes. As for military, the Air Force has it's own weather teams as well. I'd assume others do as well.

NOAA is ripe for President Musk's axe if Uncle Trump says so
That is what I was thinking of too! From 2014: https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/the-birth-and-death....
> That doesn't always mean they do the same exact thing. There's lots that are different too.

That's good. Gotta keep people on their toes.
America is a creative class economy. We do financing, design, marketing, and of course, patent trolling. Adam Smith was all about owning the means of production but that's just a bunch of baloney. Let China have that part. We will be able to maintain relevance indefinitely simply by demanding money while someone else does the work. Damn it feels good to be a rent seeker!
Top thing I want to know about a parser/parser generator library, is will it go fast? After a poor experience with Chevrotain startup performance I’m more open to parser-generators than parsers, I’m very happy to pay for a build step if my compiler will boot up faster (important in the browser) and have better throughout.
I've owned 17 Seagate ST12000NM001G (12TB SATA) drives over the last 24mos in a big raidz3 pool. My personal stats, grouping by the first 3-4 SN characters:
- 5/8 ZLW2s failed
- 1/4 ZL2s
- 1/2 ZS80
- 0/2 ZTN
- 0/1 ZLW0
All drives were refurbs. Two from the Seagate eBay store, all others from ServerPartDeals. 7/15 of the drives I purchases from ServerPartDeals have failed, at least four of those failures have been within 6 weeks of installation.

I originally used the Backblaze when selecting the drive I'd build my storage pool around. Every time the updated stats pop up in my inbox, I check out the table and double-check that my drives are in fact the 001Gs.. the drives that Backblaze reports has having 0.99% AFR.. I guess the lesson is that YMMV.
Not to “fight“, but just to add to the conversation:

I agree it is taking on more risk, although potentially less than with out-of-the-money options. To lose 99% of spuu’s value the sp500 would have to drop 50% in one day, or 35% for three days in a row, or 20% for nine days in a row, etc with infinite similar cases. It’s not a rigorous argument, but I think those examples give a feel for how common/rare that occurrence would be — I think these particular cases have never happened since the sp500 started.

But it’s certainly riskier-than-traditional in either case
As PlatformOps (formerly DevOps (formerly SRE (formerly Ops))), either this was hilarious satire or ChatGPT Ketamine trip. I'm not sure.

> In the year 2030, no one will remember Kubernetes.

So what's going to handle out rolling out new versions of your WASM, setting up whatever Reverse Proxy you pick and other stuff involved getting. A bunch of scripts you wrote to do this for you? https://www.macchaffee.com/blog/2024/you-have-built-a-kubern...

> The promise of DevOps has been eroded by complicated tooling and tight coupling of program-container-linux. In my experience, developers want to write code and ship features to hit their quarterly goals.

Here is why we ended up here: In my experience, developers want to write code and ship features to hit their quarterly goals.

Sure, and my angry PlatformOps (formerly DevOps (formerly SRE (formerly Ops))) is stuck picking up the pieces because we are getting crap while we desperately paging you because we have no clue what "duplicate street key" in your logs mean. On top of that, InfoSec dropped us 10 tickets about code level library vulnerabilities in your docker container but all the Developer's Managers got together to convince them it was our problem somehow.

So we are forced to write this bundle of terribly written Ops type software in attempt to keep this train on the tracks while you strap rockets to cafe car.

WASM replacing containers is just a solution looking for a problem. Containers solved a problem of "How do we run two different versions of PHP on a single server without them colliding." Most of the containers problem is higher level DevOps problems that we haven't been able to solve and WASM isn't going to change that. I deal with a team that writes 100% Golang so their code is like WASM as it's ship binary and done. Yea, they begged for Kubernetes because it works a ton better then custom Ansible they wrote to keep these VMs/Load Balancer in sync.
Honestly this is being tried but we can't even classify emerging new pests (for lack of science funding and staffing). Many engineers have a keyboard view of how the agriculture industry works and only when they are boots on ground do they realize the actual problems faced by farmers. This is not an attack on engineers, but for every person with a weed laser idea, there's very few willing to implement it.
> I'm no wasm expert, but I find it just fantastically unlikely that they're going to beat the decades of research that have gone into the JIT in the JVM anytime soon

Probably not, but that's sort of orthogonal to my point.

Java started as "write once run anywhere", but it has almost become the opposite of that: "write once, run it on your specific server".

"Portability" is not nearly the same concern with Java as it was thirty years ago; I don't have direct numbers on this, but I would guess that a vast majority of Java code written in 2025 is either running on a server or running an Android app, neither of which are nearly as "portable" what was kind of promised in the 90's, at least not on the desktop.
Ignoring how long it takes to build a nuclear power plant, and how we have limited resources to do so, is there anything to suggest they're doing that because of AI compute? From what I understand, they just want to be carbon neutral which is difficult to do when your compute needs increase exponentially.
Medical care should not be pay walled, full stop.

Oops. Looks like precedence has been set.
Sigh... I did not say anyone could actually opt out.

I said what someone who did not accept the very premis of copyright would or should logically be expected to do.

They would not participate in the thing they don't recognize. If everyone else gives their works a default copyright, that's everyone else's problem, they didn't do it.

But GPL is ver definitely not that.

It is not subverting or perverting or sabotaging copyright, it IS a bog standard employment of the right to set the terms over a thing that you believe you have the right to set the terms for, and you have very definite ideas about what you want and don't want other people to be allowed to do.

When I choose GPL for something, make no mistake that the reason I do so is because those are the terms I want to enforce. I want to impose exactly the limits it imposes. That is my payment for the product. I am using copyright for it's intended (or at least advertised) purpose, not trying take a notch out of the concept of copyright because I don't believe in the validity of copyright.
Encouragement is definitely not a required element. https://www.cantorcolburn.com/news-newsletters-387.html
These tools are cool but can someone explain what is the technological edge of windsurf vs cursor, vs this product, vs V0 varcel. Are they fine tuning LLMs or are they just advanced prompting wrapped around the foundational models?
Not quite RTX, but it almost happened,
25 years ago :P http://www.x86-secret.com/articles/divers/v5-6000/v56kgb-6.h...
there's no such thing like a free market economy that embraced capitalism in history

there're only certain stages of economy had advantages in foreign trade so they claim themself as 'free market' and try to force others accept this 'free market'
It's likely intentional to lower the hiring cost for future employees.
WASM might replace processes, but the idea that people will take the stuff they can't manage to put in a native process, and somehow manage to cram it into WASM... ridiculous.

There's not even a single argument in there to support the clickbait title. We have containers, but "containers are annoying". WASM won't be annoying? Pray tell, how do you surmise that?

Docker too complicated? Build times too long? You believe WASM tools will be simpler and faster... why?
Shouldn't New Mexico also be renamed New America?
For those who might wonder how one gets into a situation where they need this, here's one way that a large number of people have run into.

• Once upon a time there was the iTunes music store. This was before Apple got into cloud services. Your iTunes account was identified by your email address.

• Later Apple got into cloud services with their MobileMe product. When you created your MobileMe account you were given an Apple email address, such as one at @mac.com or @me.com.

• MobileMe accounts could not buy stuff on the iTunes store and iTunes accounts could not buy MobileMe stuff.

• At some point the MobileMe (or its successor iCloud) accounts and iTunes accounts were merged becoming an Apple account.

This merger did not try to merge individual iTunes and cloud accounts. It simply merged the systems. New users only needed to create one Apple account, but those of us who were around from the iTunes days ended up with two Apple accounts.

• If you try to do something that requires being logged into your Apple account when you are not logged in you get prompted to log in.

Sometimes it is not clear what triggered this. Is it something that needs you Apple account that was once an iTunes account or your Apple account that was once a MobileMe account?

Eventually many of us eventually logged into the wrong account, so say we are trying to buy a song but mistakenly sign in to our Apple account that was once a MobileMe account, or we were trying to buy extra cloud storage and mistakenly sign in to our Apple account that was once our iTunes account.

Now we've got purchases on both accounts. Similarly it was easy to end up with calendars on both accounts and email on both accounts.

• Until this Apple provided absolutely no support for straightening this out. For calendars and cloud storage and similar you could pick one account and copy everything from your other account to it and delete it from the other and cancel your paid storage.

But if you had purchased music or movies or books or apps on both accounts you were screwed, unless you wanted to purchase them again.

Sometimes you got lucky. Apps were they only things I had purchased on both, and the ones on the account that has once been a MobileMe account were all free so it was no big deal to just "purchase" them again on the other account.

My phone still occasionally asks me to sign in to the account that was once a MobileMe account, but I've never been able to figure out why. Everything that I'm aware of that requires an Apple account login is set to use the account that was once an iTunes account, and I don't notice any problems when I refuse to login to the former MobileMe account.
>Japan is one of the foremost funders of deep research.

Perhaps they were once upon a time, it's questionable if they still are today.

And anyway, that's not even the real problem Japan's R&D world has: The real problem is that Japan can't bring products to market. If you can't make some money your R&D is going to eventually run out of gas and die.

Japan is also poorer than its financials might suggest. Japanese society shuns pioneering, the road not yet taken might as well be the plague; everyone wants to be #2 or lower, not #1. This means a lot of Japanese capital ends up sitting around doing nothing besides accruing petty interest, only a small fraction gets budgeted for pioneering into the new and the unknown after significant disparagement.
No they don't. Server-grade redundant PSUs usually use a CRPS form factor, where individual PSU modules slot into a common multi-module PSU housing known as a PDB (power distribution board). Each module typically outputs only 12V and the PDB manages the down-conversion to 5V, 5VSB, and 3.3V. From there, there is only one set of power cables between the PDB and the system's components including the motherboard and any PCIe add-in cards. Additionally, there is a PMBus cable between the PDB and the motherboard so that the operating system and the motherboard's remote management interface (e.g. IPMI) can monitor the status of each individual module (AC power present, measured power input, measured power output, measured voltage input, measured frequency input, fan speeds, temperature, which module is currently powering the system, etc).

PSUs can be removed from the PDB and replaced and reconnected to a source of power without having to shut down the machine or even remove the case lid. You don't even need to slide the machine out of the rack if you can get to the rear.

Example:

https://www.fspgb.co.uk/_files/ugd/ea9ce5_d90a79af31f84cd59d...
Concur. I find that RustRover and PyCharm are outstanding in terms of refactoring, introspection, and treating projects as unified. But they are so slow. Lately, even copy+pasting may take seconds or longer. This and other actions sometimes terminate with an error about being too complex.

Can't I have both power, and responsiveness?
DecTalk, an early text-to-speech device. The story goes that one member of the team, whose voice was used as the basis for the sounds, lost his voice.

Dr. Dennis Klatt. He developed cancer (throat of some sort, I'd assume) and did lose his voice but died within a year, AFAIK.

Perhaps more memorable than the very notable DECTalk, he built original voice synthesizer for, and was the voice of, Stephen Hawkings.
You're not paying for art. You're paying for paper you can later display art on.

Also, with e.g. an oil painting on canvas, the cost of producing that is the time of the artist to paint it by hand. I don't think 10-20K is anywhere reasonable for e.g. a mass-produced inkjet-printed thing. Likewise 10-20K for a PNG file would be even more insane.
Case law is public domain. You can publish digitized copies of Westlaw books with the headnotes, keys, and a couple of other property bits redacted. Any of their proprietary elements though, definitely including the key cites, are clearly a no-go. The headnotes not only require creativity and expertise to make, many lawyers consider them indispensable (though many other lawyers apparently throw shade at lawyers that rely on them.) And since most of the rest of the book is public domain, it’s one of the biggest, if not the biggest selling point for their texts. They famously vigorously defend their copyrights— the defendant surely knew what they were signing up for when they started doing this.
When my sister was dying of cancer, she reached a point where she wasn’t speaking.

So not exactly last words, but I remember holding her hand and she would give me two squeezes. I would like to think it was her ‘saying’ “Love you” or “Thank you” perhaps?

I’d give her 3 back to say, “Love you too.”
Resist Authoritarianism by Refusing to Obey in Advance (2017)
I actually tried doing this a couple weeks ago. Rust on Cloudflare Workers. It didn't go well -- compiling to wasm disables a lot of Rust features, to the point where it just didn't make sense anymore. I gave up after trying to get some crypto stuff working. I eventually switched to using raw JS because Cloudflare Workers exposes the Web Crypto API, but next time I want to run Rust serverlessly, I'm just going to put it on Lambda, compiled to a regular binary.
There are no programs that will fully transpile Perl to not-Perl, because that would require parsing Perl.

A code converter that kindof-sortof-but-not-really transpiles (like Python's 2to3) would require a lot of debugging of ugly machine generated source code. Who wants to do that? Would probably be even harder than a full rewrite. (How many Python libraries were actually ported using 2to3?) Similar for using any translation an LLM might spit out.

So yes, by hand. And it's not obvious if a full rewrite of a complex library would be easier than porting its runtime to WASM, especially when said runtime has been ported to countless other systems already.
> Is that not the case?

it is - they're laughably slow and not even supported by latest CUDA

> NVIDIA Driver support for Kepler is removed beginning with R495. CUDA Toolkit development support for Kepler continues through CUDA 11.x.
Emscripten seems pretty stable and easy to use to me?
I feel like the reason immigration is a controversial issue is because people don't feel like one's circumstance of birth is really their "fault". If you don't have a choice in the matter, can you really be blamed? And thus, there's no reason people born in America should get any special privileges compared to those born elsewhere.

I agree. If we could snap our fingers, and fix everything that went wrong in someone's life due to unforutunate circumstances, there is no reason they should be blamed. However, until we can, we have to blame people, even if they are not complicit in their circumstance.

For example, if someone puts a gun to your head, and tells you to shoot a random passerby, I won't blame you very much when you stand in trial without a gun to your head. However, if that gun never leaves your head, e.g. you're part of an enemy military, it seems rather justified to shoot to kill on sight. Maybe you don't want to be there, but you cannot change your circumstance and neither can I, so I have to find fault (or die).

Immigration seems similar. People who want to immigrate to the US are not complicit in their circumstance. If they could have been born in America, and gotten the education, resources, and connections Americans have, they would have. We can snap our fingers, and let them change nationalities, but it will not magically give them the same education, resources, or connections Americans have. And thus, we must find fault in them unless they come in with said education, resources, and connections.

This is just game theory. I consider the purpose of "fault" or "blame" to determine who gets punished so that I am better off. Thus, if I will not be better off with someone immigrating into my country, I should blame them for the circumstances of their birth. Is it fair? "Fair" is a tricky word. At the very least, it seems right.

An issue I find with lots of people on the pro-immigration side is they claim immigrants (1) take jobs I wouldn't want anyway, (2) boost the economy, (3) increase birthrates, and so on, but this doesn't answer why we should allow immigration. Everyone, even the restrict-immigration crowd, is pretty pro-immigration when it comes to people that will make their lives better. But, in America at least, the pro-immigration crowd seems to want completely open movement. Why would that be better than having your cake and eating it too? I.e. let anyone who is good for the economy in, and leave everyone else out?
What does the "proper" way of reducing the $2T annual deficit look like?
Right. Moore's law has made too much progress. We must claw back some slowness! Let's take code that could run securely at full speed and run it in emulation at half the speed instead. That'll keep those menacing hardware performance improvements at bay a little longer.