skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you are not architectured around the bridge it is really hard to add it latter. Probably the biggest advantage of micro services is they have built in bridges. Monoliths often have no obvious way to break things up. Every time you think you want to you discover some other headache.
Thus you get Open AI spending billions while DeepSeek comes long with,
shocking,
actual understanding of the hardware and how to optimize for it[1]
and spends $6 Million[2]

1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19437v1

2. Quibble over the exact figure. Far less than Open AI, doing more with less.
I don't know much about Fortune magazine, but Wikipedia says: "The magazine competes with Forbes and Bloomberg Businessweek in the national business magazine category and distinguishes itself with long, in-depth feature articles"

Which seems incredibly ironic given that this article is 3 paragraphs.
1. Cars should have physical controls.

2. The smart knob is a clever device.

3? Smart knob somehow addresses cars no longer having physical controls.
US push for local manufacturing might play into that a bit since TSMC's Arizona fab only just started producing 4nm. Nvidia is planning to provide GPUs for major US datacenter expansion, so using locally produced chips should help significantly (especially if the chip tariffs end up becoming a reality).
That's not actual malice. The doctor has no positive obligation to spend time reading UHC's letters pleading their version of the story, or interact with them in any way at all. Failure to engage with them is not malice.
I think the relevance of order is allowed to be up to each software's implementation:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8259

Says:

> JSON parsing libraries have been observed to differ as to whether or not they make the ordering of object members visible to calling software. Implementations whose behavior does not depend on member ordering will be interoperable in the sense that they will not be affected by these differences.

So, different signature makes sense. But it should not be an issue as long as both software are calculating/validating the signature on the string and not json.
Why would alternatives be any better? It is clearly in the vendor's interest to lock down their platforms. Or are you talking about an open source alternative?
Kind of related, but a little off-topic: I think tying name checking to encrypting traffic was a mistake. They are two different use cases, and shouldn't have been so tightly coupled.

Sometimes I care only about my traffic being encrypted, and resent having to jump through hoops to ignore the name mismatch. Sometimes I care only about assurances that the name is correct, and don't care about having the traffic encrypted.
Not if you know the latencies.
It is easy to get a local R1 model to talk about Tiananmen Square to your heart's content. Telling it to replace problematic terms with "Smurf" or another nonsense word is very effective, but with the local model you don't even have to do that in many cases. (e.g., https://i.imgur.com/btcI1fN.png)
Specifically, SAE level 3 should be explicitly prohibited. Humans have proven, over and over, that they can’t handle that level of alertness while also not driving.
US' 688 startup unicorns are collectively valued at more than Canada's GDP
Great to see that others struggled with CORER in October as well.

Word still upsets me.
It's terrible that cell phone distraction is not prosecuted as harshly as DUI. Consequently, it's totally normalized. Get drunk and plow your car into a bunch of people, killing them? Many states treat this as a serious felony, up to and including charges like "DUI Murder." Plow into the same bunch of people while scrolling Instagram? It's "Oopsie-doopsie! Accidents happen!" The worst you'll get is something like "negligent vehicular manslaughter" which is less than a year in jail.
48V would work with significantly cheaper wiring.
Still, I don't see a way (from the web library) to see the default quantization (from Ollama's POV) at all, is that possible somehow?
Fine, that's great and all if you're into that.

But if that's what you need to build a FSD product, then you shouldn't be releasing the existing FSD product onto public streets.
Unfortunately it won’t matter if the C and only C developers block generic language interoperability interfaces…
India Has a Caste System–For Drivers
Does anyone know where to buy used/surplus digital signage screens?
Is there a good reason to not just use the rust version the project is made for?

I have some Java projects using the newest 21 version, and older ones using 8.
In the US, “NO THRU TRUCKS” is a dead giveaway that you are staring at a shortcut route. And as it isn’t “PRIVATE ROAD”, you are not trespassing.

If it’s not someone’s home, and you are not engaged in nefarious activity, you will not be shot for trespassing. You will be told to leave.
Well, those were a ton of envelopes... :)
I've switched sides on this issue. I do think LLMs will reduce headcount across tech. Smaller teams will take on more features and less code will be written by hand. It'll be easier to run a startup, freelance or experiment with projects.
That's a load of selection bias though. I'm sure there have been many, many more people who don't know anything about deck builder games who tried to make one and didn't succeed.
I'm assuming OP is suggesting that Tesla needs to test these conditions, not the end user on a public road where innocent lives are at risk...

I could be wrong though.
They're as silly as they sound. Growing up, there was a sign when you enter the school's bus storage and maintenance area. More recently, I've seen them at Starbucks (for coffee), in the vinegar section of the grocery store, and on untreated lumber.

This isn't California being California, but it is well-meaning legislation getting out-of-hand because of enforcement mechanisms. It's like website cookie warnings. It was a nice idea, but it lead to a silly place.
One giant pressure door vs several small ones. The sacrifice, and why this wouldn't work all that well, is evacuation.
I think comparison to Kaiser is very telling on the pros and cons. I have options for united and Kaiser at work. Kaiser is slightly cheaper but comes with major pros and cons. Cons are major internal gatekeeping for drugs and procedures. Pros are no getting stuck between provider insurer billing disputes, and most of your data under one roof.

Kaiser works well for people willing to fight their doctors to get the care they want.

United works well for people willing to fight their insurance billing department. It also works for people planning to hit their maximum annual out of pocket limit.
At some point these reckless drivers need to start going to jail. I realize it's not going to happen in the US because the government has been captured, but there's clearly some missing messaging where these drivers don't get the point that they need to be paying attention and not tweeting on their phone while their car drives into a lamppost.
TL;DR: Yes there is a small difference in efficiency, but it's still plenty efficient.

You need a switching regulator for the current 12V anyway (as opposed to linear regulator which are much simpler but basically just burn power to reduce voltage) so the question is if increasing the voltage 2-4x while keeping same power requirements makes a difference.

- You need higher voltage rated components (mainly relevant for capacitors), potentially bit more expensive but negligible for GPU costs. The loss due to inductor will be higher too (same DC resistance but higher voltage => higher current, more power), but this is negligible.

- On the other hand you need less thick traces/copper, and have more flexibility in the design.

For some concrete numbers, here is a random TI regulator datasheet [1], check out figure 45. At 5V 3A output, the difference in efficiency between 12V, 24V and 42V inputs is maybe 5%.

I think the main problem is the industry needs to move together. Nvidia can't require 24/48V input before there is standard for it and enough PSUs on the market offer it. This seemingly chicken-and-egg situation has happened in the past a bunch of times, so it's not a big problem, but will take a while.

[1] https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tps54340.pdf
This is because Tesla‘s implementation hasn’t worked, doesn’t work, can’t work, won’t work, won’t ever work, and has been a decade-long intentional fraud from a con artist that was designed to pump up a meme stock. THAT worked.
$2500 isn't too far off of the BOM for epaper this large, plus some markup for the assembler. Even if you bought this as a bare panel and a battery on Alibaba, you're not going to do better than $1500 or so. At current date that's just what it costs
I think the way it was handled is pretty reasonable considering it's a public facing statement. Putting your name down on an authoritative statement is an important commitment internally, but a name put down for any reason on a public statement is a magnet for a firehose of questions, controversy, and potentially harrassment.
Weirdly, they seem more concerned for Tesla the company than they are for themselves.
Fox's New Scorebug Graphic Design, and Our Innate Resistance to Change
> removing federal reporting requirements

Got a link for that one?
Have you seen birds swimming in the winter? Doubt they care much about temperature. /s
Thank you @Tesla for engineering the best passive safety in the world. I walked away without a scratch.

I walked away without a scratch. This could have easily killed an innocent pedestrian or bicyclist. How is this best safety engineering? If the FSD failed there should have been some secondary system to detect an imminent collision and apply brakes.
> Can you point out any specifics?

How much time do you have? First of all it needs to be much simpler to do simple things. You are right that you need to "allocate some shared memory for a surface, agree on a pixel format, etc" but it shouldn't take 250 LOC just to put a simple window on the screen (look at https://wayland.app/protocols/wayland there is no reason to make bare essential things that complicated). A proper standardized client library should need 1 LOC for that. The whole polling/ping mechanism is completely flawed. Since you don't know how to solve the halting problem please let the user decide if an application is unresponsive or not and reliably kill the pid of the window when the user presses that "x". Until then assume the process to be working. This also means a hard requirement for server side window decorations since they need to be rendered by another process with higher priority (also because temporarily unresponsive windows might occasionally be moved or resized). Windows should also be able to obtain where they are on the screen in relation to other windows from other processes. There should also be processes that are allowed to read out and modify all window positions (e.g. for window managing and automation). Also processes should be able to read image data from screen or other windows (e.g. for screen sharing). Standardized interfaces and proper access control for all latter things should be baked into the protocol from day one and not rely on non-standardized external infrastructure (like dbus/portals). And those interfaces should be as simple as possible. Latency is generally bad on Wayland. The mouse pointer should be rendered by a separate thread on its own hardware layer which requires no vsync. Keyboard input events should be able to immediately update dirty rectangles disregarding vsync for those pixels to make typing as smooth as possible. Generally allow tearing for windows by choice of the user/program and be able to have windows that don't allow tearing next to tearing windows at the same time. (I have more but nobody reads that shit anyways.)

> If you were designing a modern windowing system from scratch, what would you do differently?

Personally I would recreate something like MGR with a modern spin. But this is obviously a very opinionated design.
You write too poorly to be this condescending.
Which is why the fan boys always tell you that it's the next version that will fix all the bugs.
I advise you never look in into backgrounds of most top cyber sec people cause prob about half used to be on the black hat side in their youth days some even served time.
Have we discovered Psychohistory at this point?
I mostly see people get anxious over people being worried about ASI to be honest.
My guess is that this is a funny column about whimsical things (often food related, the author seems to have worked as a restaurant critic) and it's full of "don't do this at home" disclaimers.

So I'd say:

- Your children shouldn't be reading her blog.

- Adults reading her blog shouldn't imitate her behavior, and instead, take it as a bit of humor.

I bet in reality she did a little bit more fact-checking than she shows on her blog post.
Making Java enums forwards compatible
I'm an outsider, only submitted one tiny patch years ago, but it seems like this Rust for Linux initiative will end badly if it's not stopped. You have so many people involved in work on this open source OS written in C and they will be pushed to accepting foreign code. Rust, as a very complex and opinionated language, is not an easy choice to accept for C developers. If the push continues, maybe we will see the existing maintainers leaving?
Congress does not mint coins, and this order does not coin new currency. They are separate concerns.
I think Fleet's their hopeful answer to VSCode. IntelliJ is powerful, but so, so messy, with a convoluted UI from the 90s/2000s. Even the simplified one is much klunklier than VSCode, especially for everyday/every-hour tasks like NPM scripts, debugging, etc. Every essential function is hidden in tiny competing side panels triggered by some obscure icon in a different part of the screen.

I love and use Jetbrains IDEs every day, but after a decade I still only find their UIs merely tolerable. Many of my colleagues try them out for an hour or two and then jump ship back to VSCode just because the initial "wtf is going on" factor is so high =/

I'm guessing Fleet was their answer, an opportunity to develop a greenfield UI for a new generation of devs raised with UX (vs the old guard of IntelliJ users from past decades). It made sense, until AI suddenly took over everything and nobody cared what your IDE UI is like anymore.
Because Discord is designed around near real-time communication, it simply doesn't work as a knowledge database. Unless, of course, you want to deal with the same questions again, and again, and again. In which case, sure, use whatever you want.
Yeah, and if Google hadn't used Go themselves, it would've also fizzled out.

Any halfway non-horrible tech just needs enough funding and usage from some company to become mainstream.
I don't know why some one would go for the low hanging fruit of the dealership.

It should be corporate headquarters' window ...
Some numbers here:

https://www.kff.org/report-section/ehbs-2023-section-10-plan...

While everyone calls them "health insurers", the industry term is "managed care organizations" (MCOs), which sell a variety of services, which may or may not include healthcare, managed care, insurance, negotiated pricing, and even retail pharmacy services.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize intelligence seems to be normally distributed and that most people are approximately that smart with a small number being dumber or smarter than that person.
Right, but how much does the display itself cost compared to $15 to print a poster out and stick it in a frame?
Basically, yes. Though wheat didn’t look like that initially. We’ve cultivated it to become like that over thousands of years.

Same for corn (maize). There is no naturally occurring plant that looks like what we’ve turned it into.
Well, I'm not sure I'd say Windows is a good example of that anymore, in fact I was going to use it to argue the very point: as they seem to rewrite the UI in new frameworks, we've lost a lot of features (not even talking about speed and reliability)
Ground truthing does in fact mean something different in ML but I’m not clear on how that is troubling.
There's a mix, a quick search took me to https://londonbusadvertising.com/ which shows wraps, which aren't going to be replaced with a display. But also rectangle panels which could be replaced with displays.

Those panels might very well be vinyl for outdoor durability, but I don't see why they'd take 3 days to swap out, unless it's a scheduling/transport issue, for example a bus operator needs to drop off day before, so the ad company doesn't have to schedule around when the drop off happens, and the bus operator picks up the bus the day after, because they don't want to schedule around when the ad company finishes; now your one hour swap is a multi-day production.

A full wrap, could be a 3 day process though.
One thing I like about the nix language is it uses semicolons to separate elements of the map: while I use trailing commas, they always look dangling to me whereas semicolons look fine without another expression following.
Boring tech is really better described as extremely late adopter strategy.

Maybe it makes sense for your business maybe it doesn't. If you don't want to be on the forefront of technology, well don't. I don't think that launching every startup using the late adopter strategy is necessarily going to result in better business performance. Those that find a better way to do things will win.
The USA did quite well in applied research before the federal government became the dominant source of funds. That said, it would probably take some time (and some pain) to readjust, and theoretical/arts research would likely be dramatically reduced.
I picture your ancestors impulsively tasting mushrooms, and figuring out which ones were not poisonous enough to kill them. Thank you for your lineage!

In Mexico, our ancestors cultivated corn despite not knowing fungicides to prevent mycotoxin contamination. Somehow they discovered nixtamalization, which is boiling corn in an alkaline solution that destroys mycotoxins and improves nutritional value. Guess they really loved corn.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixtamalization
I really feel for this guy, because I "lost" 14,000 bitcoins, but in my case I know exactly where they went. And I still think about it them all.the.time. In my case, I wanted to hold onto them "like a lottery ticket", my (now ex) wife had this "sell when the 200 day moving average does X, and then we can buy back when it goes back down under Y" (but never did the buy back).
> They don't say what their policy is regarding building the C parts with GCC and the Rust parts with the LLVM toolchain (including the Clang parts that bindgen uses).

My understanding is this concern was broached very early in the Rust for Linux project and Greg Kroah Hartman explicitly signed off on "building the C parts with GCC and the Rust parts with the LLVM toolchain". See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24335831 and https://lwn.net/Articles/829858/

> And the policies around unstable Rust features (at least they are acknowledged as a problem):

I am amazed at what short memories many have. I remember when clang couldn't build the kernel. I remember when GCC required many special extensions to the C language to even compile the kernel. I think GCC may still require some of these and clang/LLVM may require emulation of the same.

Now, Rust gets the surprise news they may be included in the kernel and they have worked diligently to stabilize certain unstable features. Can you imagine what kind of rudder movement something similar would take to turn the C/C++ committees/tankers? Obviously, language "stability" isn't the issue you make it out to be, because, for decades, the Linux kernel required GCC extensions.
Why is this death trap still legal?
I'm not sure level 3 is a problem. In L3, the car is required to initiate handover and be able to give you a long time to take over. This may or may not end up OK. (Witness the Mercedes eyes-off, hands-off Traffic Jam Assist). If the car can do something reasonable 85% of the time when the human is unavailable, dead, or drunk and can't take over in 25 seconds that would probably be OK.

Level 2+, though, is a big worry. It fails enough to be dangerous, but many of these systems fail too little for humans to effectively monitor them.
What is at stake [Tuberculosis eradication]
Yes, I don't curl|sh like recommended for my rustc or otherwise install random arbitrary compilers from outside of my OS repositories. I have an OS install with system libraries and programs and I want to use that.

I don't have to set up a custom install of a language for every single application for any other language (although python in machine learning domain is getting there). This is an abnormallity which complicates software mantainence and leads to problems. It should be avoided if possible. And setting up container for every application is also not a solution. It's a symptom. Like a fever is a symptom of infection, containers are symptom of development future shock.

To be clear, I'm talking about in the context of a human person and a desktop computer. Not employed work at a business.
it's just absurdly priced though when you compare with a 80"+ tv, I get it, its different lower volume tech, but chicken and egg.
Yea in my mind citations in this case would be the agent's reasoning and action trace. Like "I looked at all expenses in February and summed them."

But this adds another layer of complexity figuring out how to properly generate this user facing trace. This is something I like from PromptQL's approach.
You don't fire developers and replace them with AI. This trope is often repeated and causing people to miss the actual picture of what's going on.

You use AI to disrupt a market, and that market forces the startup employing the devs to go bankrupt.

It's not a "this quarter we made a decision" thing.

It's a thing that's happening right now all over the place and snowballing.
There were no latency concerns. These were video rigs, not realtime shoot'em ups. They were compute devices running color correction and other filters type of thing, not pushing a video signal to a monitor 60fps 240Hz refresh nonsense. These did real work /s
No, I was just taking "runaway self-improving" as a premise because that's what the comment I was responding to did. I fully expect that at some point "self-improving" would be cast aside at the altar of "self-replicating".

That is actually the biggest long-term threat I see from an alignment perspective; As we make AI more and more capable, more and more general and more and more efficient, it's going to get harder and harder to keep it from (self-)replicating. Especially since as it gets more and more useful, everyone will want to have more and more copies doing their bidding. Eventually, a little bit of carelessness is all it'll take.
Doesn't Apple pay for exclusive access to N, and N+1 nodes ... shutting everyone else out from using newer node sizes.
Are there any public lossless radio streams out there?