skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's clearly not comparable, as wearing a seat belt might make you feel more safe, but it doesn't actively encourage you to pay less attention to the road by its design. The act of driving is roughly the same with or without seat belts. Driver assist or self driving drastically alters how you drive.
Yikes. Replying because I noticed my egregious typo: "theirs", not "there's".
Eliminating both the creator AND the customer? It’s an almost perfect business model.
Earlier you wrote "The average age of boys being exposed to porn is about 13".

Now you say "infinite stream of whatever sounds interesting at the moment".

Those are two quite different things.

To start with, just because a kid saw pornography doesn't mean it was wanted. From a 2007 paper, "Forty-two percent of youth Internet users had been exposed to online pornography in the past year. Of those, 66% reported only unwanted exposure." (From "Unwanted and Wanted Exposure to Online Pornography in a National Sample of Youth Internet Users")

In quite a few countries, the way to watch porn as a teen is to set your alarm for 1am and watch soft porn on regular broadcast TV.
https://archive.ph/zSrMm
Nice, very glad to see it works! Small models are very sensitive to the dtype :(
Land of the free ... for the people, not the corporations.

Which is of course a good thing.
I'm happy you've only worked for altruistic, not-for-profit minded companies that care about employee growth and takes pride in their tach stack above all else. I have not had as fortunate an experience.

>I expect that once many begin to do this, there will be some who do use it for productivity and they will set the bar.

Yeah, probably. I've had companies so pinpointed on "velocoity" instead of quality. I imagine they will definitely try to expect triple the velocity just because one person "gets so much done". Not realizing how much of that illusion is correcting the submissions.
Coal gasification, an old technology, is quietly expanding across Asia
Was there some sort of actual geographic decision or is this all just bowing to the powers that be for no apparent reason?

This some sort of rich guy purity test?

Do we do this in schools next?
They would just censor output.

Youtube doesn't need to figure out how to stop copyright material from being uploaded, they need to stop it from being shared.
I think that's the biggest difference between SC 1&2, although the former is still being nudged a bit through map design.

SC2 in its first decade has been about always keeping the game fresh - new units, new spells, adventurous changes, crazy maps. As of 2020, the changes not only stopped, but the game was caught for a few years in a pretty crappy state: nigh unbeatable PvT cheeses, 40min-long PvZs where Zerg is clearly winning but can't close the game, meanwhile no Protoss in top 10 GM or major tourney semifinals. The worst of it has now been fixed, but the changes are only slight tweaks and nudges, now again reminding me of Brood War. It's still an excellent game though.
Let's just concentrate this ability in the hands of few, so they can do it responsibly.
Ah, the client is OSS, that’s good, appreciate the effort on reproducibility - I know how tough that is.

In theory I suppose that makes running one of the nodes less of an issue.

Would you guys ever be open to hosting a relay for other parties? I’ve been wanting to deploy OHTTP Proxy for Waterfox but have struggled being able to justify running a node myself and finding two separate parties has been a PITA.
You can win economically, especially if it's a slam dunk case and hence get a lawyer on contingency. That said, it can take a long time to resolve which can prolong any stress surrounding it. And even if the other party is clearly, obviously at fault, they may spread falsehoods about you and the case. Especially if this is done in private, it's practically difficult to do anything about.
My partner and I make an informal hobby of tracking language like that which is designed to sneakily water down the strength of a headline. "Amid" rather than "because of" is a really good one. My personal favorite is "Reports: ". If you just preface your headline with that, you can say any old thing you want to and then later when pressed on the truth value of it you can retreat to the idea that you weren't reporting that as fact, you were reporting the fact that other people are saying it and you're not obligated to say who or how many or any other things that people might be saying. The practical upshot is that you as a journalist get to purposely induce people to believe something you know to be false but no one can technically call you a liar.
What do you do when there is no solution to the set of constraints? What do you do when there are multiple (usually infinitely many) solutions to the set of constraints? More importantly, how do you specify the behavior for those cases such that all browsers behave identically? I’m not saying that CSS is better (it’s not), but it’s a bit more involved than “just run a CSP solver”, and you can still get surprising behavior depending on window size, font size, content size and so on.
Clearly the owner showed that this aspect is not important to them when they ordered the Cybertruck.
I have trouble applying your comment to mine (and back to yours about master/main changes, or in general to issues relating to culture fit), sorry!

Can you give a concrete example?
Thomson Reuters chose to sue Ross Intelligence, not a company like Google or even OpenAI. I wonder how deeper pockets would have affected the outcome.

I wonder how the politics played out. The big AI companies could have funded Ross Intelligence, who could have threatened to sabotage their legal strategies by tanking and settling their own case in TR's favor.
Yup, mine blew apart in traffic on H1 (Oahu) at 35MPH when the car (530i) was ~3 years old. I think it had maybe 35k miles on it.

Dealer offered to allow me to pay extra for an all aluminum since that’s what they recommended but the factory wouldn’t cover.
It just needs to be cheaper than the average engineer, you mean.
You can also hookup a little thingy that takes sata power on one side and 24 pin on the other. As soon as there is power on sata side, relay switches and second PSU turns on.
Ah yes, new and exciting ways of more slowly shoveling JavaScript over the wire for the same CRUD applications we've been reinventing since 1998.
YouTube CEO Neal Mohan releases his four "big bets" for 2025
I think what you call "higher echelon" are just vulgarization books written by academics.

A fun example is in physics, the "Feynman" literature. Because of all the published stuff, you have only his lecture that are actually authored by him (and two co-authors, he was the speaker but by no mean the only expert involved). Lot of the books are just anaecdata or just people trying to remember discussion they had with him, and two are based on a biograph work, except he wasn't a biograph so in my country, he would probably have received pushback.

The only feynman book i would call "higher echelon" are his published public lectures. Even his biography i would consider an "airport book" (interestingly enough, i have found that book at an airport 10 years ago while visiting the western US). Still, his biography is a hundred time better than random slop written (and now probably AI-hallucinated) about him by people who met him once, and is still very interesting.
Love this, thanks for making it!
Ask HN: Has anyone used DeepSeek in production?
There's been a lot of hype about the model for it's low inference costs and chain of thought reasoning but has anyone had actual success using it for production use-cases?
I imagine the red blood was very noticeable on the white snow. I might be wrong though.
Some highlights:

runtime: new map implementation based on Swiss Tables, more efficient memory allocation of small objects, and a new runtime-internal mutex implementation. 2-3% improvement

vet checks for common mistakes in tests, fuzzers, benchmarks, and examples in test packages such as malformed names, incorrect signatures, or examples that document non-existent identifiers

The new os.Root type provides the ability to perform filesystem operations within a specific directory

New benchmark function ... perform benchmark iterations like for b.Loop() { ... }

This release includes a new set of mechanisms to facilitate FIPS 140-3 compliance. ( See recent discussion: Microsoft Go 1.24 FIPS changes https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42965404 )

Nice iterators for bytes, strings packages: Lines (returns an iterator over the newline-terminated lines), SplitSeq, SplitAfterSeq, FieldsSeq, FieldsFuncSeq

http client and server expose http2 configuration

text/template now support range-over-func and range-over-int

The go:wasmexport compiler directive is added for Go programs to export functions to the WebAssembly host
I miss mine enough I’ve been debating on buying another.

A 530i Sport with a manual (!!!) popped up near me for a song but I just can’t justify it.
'Medical malpractice' is different to 'malpractice' in general. The first is deviations from standard care the second is a dereliction of duty. I think it is every doctors duty to get good at statistics. Clearly the Bayesian statistics classes have not been sufficient.

If you consider the role of doctors to be finite state automata that execute instructions handed to them from standards bodies then we wouldn't need anything nearly as sophisticated as a LLM to replace them, a collection of decision trees would be sufficient.

Your input on the topic has not dissuaded me from my belief that doctors in general are bad at stats and therefore bad at their jobs.
If the copyright holders win, the model giants will just license.

This effectively kills open source, which can't afford to license and won't be able to sublicense training data.

This is very bad for democratized access to and development of AI.

The giants will probably want this. The giants were already purchasing legacy media content enterprises (Amazon and MGM, etc.), so this will probably further consolidation and create extreme barriers to entry.

If I were OpenAI, I'd probably be very happy right now. If I were a recent batch YC AI company, I'd be mortified.
Firefox is in good company, Safari also doesn’t.
This is a lot more of a scathing indictment of the irrational pop culture that is our sclerotic industry than you might think.
IDK, but hating on certain group (i.e. AfD) sounds you are somewhat of a nazi yourself then.

AfD are huge Israel supporters (they anti-muslim tho) - https://www.timesofisrael.com/loathed-by-jews-germanys-far-r...
> The court emphasizes "Because the AI landscape is changing rapidly, I note for readers that only non-generative AI is before me today." But I'm not sure "generative" is that meaningful a distinction here.

Also the judge makes that statement, it looks like he misunderstands the nature of the AI system and the inherent generative elements it includes.
Land Of Might: Retro Browser MMO (no sign-up /download)
Hello guys, I'm just putting this out there. I've been developing this game for the past 4 years, I think it's the best. Try it out and tell me how shit it is.
Ideally there's room for both. I'd argue for many many things stability/security is more important than performance.
This article seems interested in suggestion Japan abandon its unique approach and adopt the approach used by other nations. That is silly.

Japan is one of the foremost funders of deep research. It funds large physics experiments. It has a long history of semiconductor innovations. MEXT scholarships have proven a brilliant method to attract smart men and women from around the world.

Here in Touhoku I've met so many bright international students on MEXT scholarships doing research within those exact project-funded teams. Switching to person-focused funding would be silly, do you really think a smart guy from Congo is going to be able to win funding? That Japan has a system where the product/team can focus on an established topic, then backfill with smart researches, is a strength not a weakness.

Of course Nature is in the business of publishing papers, not science. So it makes sense they would be blind to the reality of science: you measure it in results not papers. The academics I know are all focused on achieve specific goals, they rarely talk about the papers in the way the Canadian Acedemics I know did back home. Think "I want to automate boar trap monitoring so that farmers do not need to check it everytime, and so that non-boars do not get trapped". That is the sort of highly practical research you get when a supervisor knows their field and knows their country. It might not pay off in papers, but it will pay off for Japan as a country.

The world should be taking lessons from Japan, not the other way around. Team based funding. Scholarships for bright students from any country. Deep funding for physical research other than just ITER and LHC.
TR may have intentionally chosen an easy battle to begin their legal war.
Surely you don't believe that large chips like Apple's M3 Max and M4 Max shipped while yields were still immature. So do you think that the wafers per month that TSMC is now cranking out over a year after N3B chips started landing in consumers hands still don't qualify as "full production"? How many fabs need to be fully devoted to 3nm before it is enough volume for you to consider it "full production"?
So how do you preserve free speech?
Sadly my goals are more more ephemeral than opening up a lemonade stand.
Please take the scrum masters first.
What mainstream language was before it that offered reasonable and composable memory safety without compromising on speed? I've never heard of one.
Related:

Google: Gulf of America name change in the U.S.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43012079

Google Maps now shows the 'Gulf of America'

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43007052
Cyber Conspiracy added to CFAA
They're the same people in my experience.
Kubernetes is like if someone snorted a bunch of HTTP RFCs and then decided to half-ass an operating system in an all-night bender. And then a (distributed!) propaganda machine convinced ever middle manager ever to use it.
You might not be immediately liable, but that doesn't mean you're allowed to continue. I'd assume it's your duty to cease and desist immediately once it's pointed out that you're in violation.
Create an Interactive Bar Chart with CoCube
> "Do not contradict, explain away, belittle or argue about what the person claims to have seen or heard," reads a short text that a hospice provides about the dying process. "Just because you cannot see or hear it does not mean it is not real to your loved one. Affirm his or her experience. They are normal and common."

Not all hospice or elder-care providers recommend affirming hallucinations.

Here's a quote from a nursing home guide that explores the ethical considerations of this practice:

> Lying to someone with dementia, often termed “therapeutic lying,” poses a nuanced ethical dilemma. While entering a person’s altered reality can indeed reduce their immediate distress, it’s important to acknowledge that lying is still lying.

> Over time, this practice may lead to confusion, especially in moments of clarity, and strain the trust and relationship between the patient and caregiver.

> This complexity has led caregivers and professionals to explore alternative communication strategies that honor the truth while providing comfort and reducing agitation. Two such approaches are reflection and redirection. Reflection involves acknowledging the person’s feelings and statements without directly affirming the distorted reality or lying. Redirection gently shifts the conversation or activity towards something positive and engaging without directly contradicting the person’s beliefs.
well there is this:

https://github.com/xatusbetazx17/bionical_eye_controller#bio...
After seeing all the replies in this thread talking specifically about commercial advertisements, I'm guessing I'm misunderstanding the English word (i.e. somehow, submissions are not considered advertisement for the linked blogs, and only commercial ads are being treated as ads).
the actual bill(only 2 pages) https://www.rounds.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/cyber_conspiracy...
I'm coming from the opposite. Years of Phoenix/TS and finally got tired of writing boilerplate code serializing and deserializing data just to make UIs work. I now find myself focusing 95% of my effort on adding business value rather than dealing with back-end/front-end stuff. Reminds me of the old JSP/ASP days when everything was sever-side.

I hear you on the typing part, but Elixir is taking a step in that direction with 1.8 and I only expect that to get better. I'm going to the Elixir Conf in Poland in May and hoping to learn more on what's next. So excited.
Maybe "tragicomic" would be a better word.
He did address the claims by ridiculing them.

Question is why media decided to continue spinning the same narrative despite looking like idiots? Is it clicks, political agenda or journalistic integrity? It's not hard to see...
> lots of specialized folks

This isn't what I see in R&D. The broad and deep folks are the ones with all the patents, and design wins, because they're the only ones that can see outside the box that everyone else is specialized in.
It could be true, and still propaganda, or false and propaganda? If true, pretty interesting, but presumably we might want input on the general feasibility of such an engine from a few rocket scientists. I notice mention of fuel is conspicuously absent, I would think you'd need a lot, if your engine is producing that much thrust...
what else is disturbing to 13-year old boys? lets give a list here and see whether that is age-proof in ANY way/shape/form?

while I do not disagree with you in general the current “war on porn”
in the America is a political theatre. no one gives two shits what might be disturbing to 13-year boys, it is all just political theatre
Out-of-control AI is sci-fi fearmongering, it's not about worming through systems. It will be doing exactly what it was placed there to do. It will be a human failing that puts armageddon in it's hands. And since humans have NO MEANS to prevent armageddon (The predominant policy is in fact doubling down on destruction with MAD), there will be no way to place AI in command of this defense. The asymmetrical relationship between destruction and creation will mean there will never be a defense.
>birds have no receptors for capsaicin, while mammals do.

True. I suspect it is only placental mammals. Brush-tailed possums (a marsupial mammal) do not seem repelled by it at all. I've had my birds eyes and Carolina Reaper chilly plants and fruit eaten by them.
this is also my problem. When I ask someone a technical question, and I did not provide context on some abstractions. Usually this is common because abstractions can be very deep. "Hmm, not sure.. can you check what's this supposed to do?"

LLMs don't do this, it confidently hallucinate the abstraction out of thin air or uses their outdated knowledge store. Sending wrong use or wrong input parameters.
The question that's screaming at me right now is that if humans used specialization + cooperation to achieve global dominance, what happens when you pair unlimited global masterminds + cooperation?
License what? Every available copyrighted work? Even getting a tiny fraction is not practical.

To the contrary, this just means companies can't make money from these models.

Those using models for research and personal use wouldn't be infringing under the fair use tests.
That’s technically correct but it’s also wrong.

No-code in excel is that most functions are implemented for user and user doesn’t have to know anything about software development to create what he needs and doesn’t need software developer to do stuff for him.
How is the system inherently generative?
Is there an independent, credible source on this?
Think there are some people who made GGUFs as branches of our model, try it out!

https://huggingface.co/models?other=base_model:quantized:age...
It would be quite an interesting result if we could have true General AI, but we don't simply because of copyright.

I'm aware this isn't a concern yet, but imagine if the future played out this way....

Or worse: Only those with really deep pockets can pay to get AI, and no one else can, simply because they can't afford the copyright fees.
I'm always reminded of the QuickTime v4.0 volume rocker and how painful it was to use.

Screenshot: https://www.macintoshrepository.org/_resize.php?imgenc=ZmlsZ...

Fortunately, it was changed to just a slider in v5.0 as seen here: https://jablickar.cz/en/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Apple-Qui...
> you dig into your existing tried & true toolkit to get the job done

Haha. Yes. But when the c-suite is made up of top level management pushed out of the s&p 500, they always assume it’s their tried and true toolkit from another company. Believe me, it’s never the hammer the current engineering staff is holding. I’m slow clapping so hard for the business school graduates right now…
Unless you somehow possess the ultimate, complete and provably correct description of reality (which is, of course, an oxymoron), or direct access to the underlying territory (which would mean, of course, you are high), everything is a model, and a model is essentially just an interpretation.
Are you sure it's not just your memories of younger/happier times?
I'm still using Borland Turbo C from time to time on my 486 machine and the compilation is so painfully slow even for smaller projects. Typing on the other hand and UI in general is blazingly fast.
Benchmarks cannot tell you whether the tech will continue supernaturally, linearly, or plateau entirely.

In the 90s, companies showed graphs of CPU frequency and projected we would be hitting 8ghz pretty soon. Futurists predicted we would get CPUs running at tens of ghz.

We only just now have 5ghz CPUs despite running at 4ghz back in the mid 2000s.

We fundamentally missed an important detail that wasn't consider at all in those projections.

We know less about the theory of how LLMs and neural networks grow with effort than we did about how transistors operate over different speeds.

You utterly cannot extrapolate from those kinds of graphs.
Bill Gates and Patrick Collison Talk at Computer History Museum
It's simply bc the model is small (1.5B), making it sensitive to weight perturbations
Starts at 0:07 into the doctor’s video here (I don’t think she posted the document outside of this format): https://x.com/epottermd/status/1888397730784883096?s=46
Intel seems to have deep-seated issues with their PR department writing checks their engineers can't pay out on time for.

Not that Intel engineers are bad - on the contrary. But as you pointed out, they've been promising they'd be further than they are now for over 5 years now, and even 10+ years ago when I was working in HPC systems, they kept promising things you should build your systems on that would be "in the next gen" that were not, in fact, there.

It seems much like the Bioware Problem(tm) where Bioware got very comfortable promising the moon in 12 months and assuming 6 months of crunch would Magically produce a good outcome, and then discovered that Results May Vary.
Now I feel a need to spin up and emulator or something capable of playing Castle Wolfenstein.

(Dear god, I'm showing my age there, aren't I?)
Delirium, so called the organic psychosis, is the common end result of every diffuse brain dysfunction, so it be chemical toxicity, inflammation, trauma or most commonly senility-dementia. It's caused because of a chemical disturbance of the brain-'soup'. Any psychotic symptom can be manifested, not only visual hallucinations. Antipsychotic therapy has massively varied results