skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I guess NYSE feels operating 2 exchanges in the same region (Midwest) is unnecessary expense.

There’s plenty of confusion on my part as to the exact purpose of a NYSE branch.

I thought it was to pre-empt the effort by some shady TX folks from setting up their own exchange (TSE). But, I don’t think that’s the case.

It doesn’t seem to matter if you “list” at NYSE Chicago or NYSE. It will still be available for sell/buy in NYSE. Thus these companies still under regulatory oversight and mandatory reporting of NYSE.

The NYSE Chicago branch, to me, is just a convenient place to buy/sell securities listed on NYSE. In the pre-digital age, this makes sense. No need to go to NYC or establish relationships in NY, but can deal locally at the NYSE branch and get the same rates. But in this modern age, the exact purpose eludes me.

I did find this on the Wiki page:

> In 2016, CHX rolled out its on-demand auction product, CHX SNAP[20] (Sub-second Non-displayed Auction Process), which received regulatory approval[21] from the Securities and Exchange Commission in October 2015 and a thorough review from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. CHX SNAP is designed to facilitate bulk trading of securities on a lit market and to minimize speed and information advantages enjoyed by only a few market participants.

Perhaps plan is to rollback some protections and give more advantage to the much more wealthier market participants?
You don’t want to redo the handshake (which, as far as I know, is identical to TLS) every time you send a packet using DTLS. Therefore, you still need to retain state information. In my opinion, using DTLS (UDP) is considerably more nuanced than using TLS (TCP) in an embedded IoT context.
Maybe try not shoving things into people's faces and you'll find them to be much friendlier.
TXSE is a listings play more than anything. This means NYSE is going to beat them to the punch, at least in concept. Means TXSE is going to have to work much harder for listings business.

From a functional standpoint, absolutely no difference. There is an extremely high probability NYSE TX remains in Mahwah (where the current NYSE Chicago platform is; it’s really just a rebranding). TXSE has already said they’re going to put their systems in Secaucus with “everyone not NYSE or NASDAQ”.

I wish one of these venues would have the conviction to put their whole kit in Dallas, or somewhere else in TX, but the industry would throw a fit because of what it would mean for the cost to access the market.
I love Node. It does a good job of exposing an OS level API of just about everything at kernel level, except file system which has an OS API for kernel level file management operations. It’s nice because of that API and it’s fast, but has its limitations.

If you need to do large recursive operations Node will likely fail. If you need memory conservation for device specific operations Node is not the tool. If you want to go faster than a garbage collected language allows Node is not the tool.

I think the bigger problem with Node id that most people writing JavaScript struggle to write JavaScript.
The name change coming from the F your feelings crowd who believe you shouldn’t be able to call yourself whatever you want.
... in Rust, to make developers (and users) care less about memory leaks and OOB accesses.
or https://github.com/azer/llmcat
yet？
I think it's useful to add the context that CNBC is correct and does appear at the top right of that picture. CNBC is not a mis-transcribing of MILK, and the letters M, I, L and K are not actually visible in the picture.
I'd love to hear what's the clear difference between regular and "woke" science.

This sounds like a Temu version of the "Un-American Activities Committee" you had in the 50-70s.
React has become the Java of late 90’s to mid 2000’s.

Loads of libraries, documentation, and developers which creates a flywheel that will grow those aspects over the next X years.

Until something comes up that is magnitude better in performance/maintainability, and even then it’ll take years to dethrone the status quo.

Good questions in these comments essentially asking, does the level of training data on these models now contribute to the inertia we see from libraries, documentation, developer support?

I believe so, but then again I think we’ll soon have more niche models for specific areas of development (like openart has with a variety of image gen models)
I take replacing myself as the ultimate challenge. Does anyone know of a workflow/tool that can from a prompt find which relevant files in a directory to include, and then update existing files and create new ones?

All the the tools I've tried require me to select which files to include in the context, and/or then require manually copying each snippet to where it should be... this makes me feel like a neanderthal in some bronze age cave.
I still don't understand what is wrong with being Woke? Being woke basically means that we see the BS for what it is, BS?

Basically, the premise of the movie "Don't look up"? So if someone cares for another person, is that now woke and somehow negative?

So how can you even do a analysis of what is woke or not woke (I dont mean the BS stats that Cruz mentioned, i mean more in regards to the article).

Its basically an impossible task to identify as it has been setup in a way where anything inconvenient to someone can be blamed as woke.
I'm more curious on how much manual effort was required to find said line of code? Strikes me as moest of these optimizations are super easy to verify, very difficult to find
Shouldn't "long term snapshot for profiling and inverting call stacks" be table stakes by now?
PerfKit Benchmarker for measuring and comparing cloud offerings
I had GitHub copilot for nearly two years. I built the entire first version of an application for almost a year in a language I didn’t know (Python) using LLMs and prompting.

Over the last year I’ve had to rewrite every single part of the application. My amount of checked in code from an LLM has reduced to literally 0. I occasionally ask ChatGPT a question on my phone.

I turned off copilot a few months ago and honestly it feels more like turning off push notifications, not like giving up a car.

And even if it were comparable to an automobile, as an American who moved to Amsterdam, I can attest that the bike life is still much more enjoyable than the car life :)
This shows that Trump reversed course on the ban, but it doesn't explain why.
Thank you for taking the time to explain it in a way that made some sense to me.
I think the modern Intellisense has the right amount of prediction - offloads enough brain activity without completely relying on something else.

AI prediction feels way too much and way too eager to give me something. I don't know about you guys, but programming is an exercise for me, not just to make it work and call it a day.

However, AI would be useful if it can offer program structural and pattern recommendations. One big problem I now face, and I believe all hobbyists face too, is that when the program grows larger, it is becoming increasingly difficult to make it well structured and easy to expand -- on the other hand, pre-mature architecturing is also an issue. Reading other people's source is not particularly useful, because 1) You don't know whether it is suitable or even well written, and 2) Usually it is too tough to read other people's source code.
What value is a contract if it can be cancelled on a whim?
Dell won't stop selling them because businesses are cheap and will keep buying them.
> the science is already politicized

Eh I don't agree with that at all. If I know upper management has some silly catch phrase about say "synergies" and I write up an email advocating for allocating some resources for some RND and I mention synergies... that's all I'm doing, including something that's required. I don't care either way about "synergies", I care about the project.

I don't agree with requiring some things be included in a proposal, but everyone trying to persuade does it. That's not political, that's communication.

Also the whole "political" line is so empty these days. Because someone found a phrase via ctrl-f doesn't mean anything. "That's political" and such phrases are just empty ways to shout down something without having to give a reason.
TrueNAS 25.04 "Fangtooth" Beta Unifies Linux Scale and FreeBSD Core Efforts
Laid-off Meta employees blast Zuckerberg: the 'cruelest tech company out there'
Why has this post been flagged? Category theory is extremely relevant to programming and this post has plenty of points and comments. Any thoughts dang?
Zed is amazing, and I definitely recommend it. That said, I will not be using their AI features, and if the editor turns into a slow, bloated monster because of them (like Visual Studio and anything made by JetBrains) I will have to ditch it.
It is hard for me to understand how proposing some minor outreach goal (that would consume <5% of the budget) politicizes the science. Perhaps the outreach was politicized, but outreach is not science.
Interesting, thanks for sharing.

Stupid/tangential question, would a primarily hindi speaker from the north know the origin of this particular idiom? or is it more of a southern thing?
This is not true. E.g., Safari is tied to the OS settings, Firefox has some dependencies regarding the locale of the first install, etc…

Moreover, probably most people speak or can read more than a single language. There may be reasons for accessing a site in a particular language other than the standard locale.

Please empower users to make their own choice! Do not assume to know better.
> Prosecuting and convicting the current head of state comes to mind.

Are you suggesting that the current head of state did not commit the crimes he was found guilty of by a jury?
The History of S.u.S.E
Power Saving Mode (PSM), a power-saving mechanism in LTE, was specifically designed to address such issues. It allows the device to inform the eNB (base station) that it will be offline for a certain period while ensuring it periodically wakes up to perform a Tracking Area Update (TAU), preventing the loss of registration. This concept is similar to Session Tickets or Session IDs in (D)TLS—or at least, that’s how I like to think about it. However, there are no guarantees that the operator will support this feature or that they will support the report-in period that you want!

Maintaining an active session for communication between the endpoint and the edge device is highly power-intensive. Even with (e)DRX, the average power consumption remains significantly higher than in sleep mode. Moreover, the vast majority of devices do not need to frequently ping a management server, as configuration and firmware updates are typically rare in most IoT deployments.
Ah thanks for the clarification! Do you happen to know if Nile/Gezira went anywhere?
Humpback whale briefly traps young kayaker in its mouth in Chile
You seem to have a very narrow understanding of the utility of language purity and effects systems.

Yes, the parser can lie to you. But the actual lying can only depend on the code you are parsing. No it can't just exfiltrate data by copying it into other messages.
Notice how neither the author nor the authorities ever defined what "woke" means to them. It's just more anti-science actions from the party that does not believe in climate change, or vaccines, etc. "Woke" is anything they don't like.

Kind of reminds me how the nazis would go after "jewish physics" [1], irrespective of the actual content of the research.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Physik?wprov=sfla1
I'm at a math conference where an amazing speaker brought up this list; she was on it.

People eligible for DEI funding are often encouraged to choose that channel over a "regular" channel, in which they might easily have been awarded funding. This inevitable adaptation is what happens when one puts filters on cigarettes, designs tax laws... To cut this funding for existing awardees would be overt discrimination.

"Outreach" language is a requirement for NSF grants. I'm surprised that a majority of the grants overall didn't trigger their search filters. It is likely that they restricted their search to these DEI channels.

Of course Ted Cruz knows this. What I don't know is if he's actually a bigot, or a maggot who knows his supporters are bigots.
This is so on point IMO, I feel like there is no better time than to learn more low level languages than now. Since the hype will in the end resolve around insanely technical people carrying all the major weight.
Which like, kinda neat that it exists, but who's using tooling that bad that they're manually copying and pasting that much code into, what, a web browser text entry box?

Use better tools people!
A clear sign of the politicization of science is the requirement in some grant applications to include sections on DEI or transgender issues, even when unrelated to the research.

How many grants have been rejected simply because a scientist refused to shoehorn DEI language into a project that has nothing to do with it?
Why leave Chicago?
> Patching ClearType is unfortunately not as straightforward as it should have been. In an ideal world, you just change the sampling kernel your rasterizer uses to match the subpixel layout (with perceptual corrections) and you’re done. In our world, it takes hackery of Lovecraftian levels of horrifying to display crisp text using a vector font

Can you explain why that is? Is it a bed Microsoft made or something more intrinsic to font rendering generally?
Still no debugger. I know there is a branch open, but it’s surprising to me that there isn’t a more concentrated effort on getting that over the line. Major props to the folks working on it. I just wish they had more resources and help getting it done.
Is there way to change this key binding (tab for accept) right now? Because otherwise I have to stop using this program. It is absolutely obnoxious.
An ad for... the IETF? All of the firmware discussed in this post is open source, and we even contributed DTLS Connection ID server side support to a popular open source library [0] so other folks can stand up secure cloud services for low power devices. Sure, we sell a product, but our broader mission is making the increasing number of internet connected devices more secure and reliable. When sharing knowledge and technology is in service of that mission, we do not hesitate to do so.

[0]: https://blog.golioth.io/golioth-announces-connection-id-supp...
DOGE.gov website can be edited by anyone
Direct link: https://doge.gov/workforce?orgId=7cd300eb-cf3f-47f5-90f1-9e6...

Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20250214122640/https://doge.gov/...
There's no equivalent translation into my native language so whenever I read 'woke' I treat it as a USA specific term like '2nd amendment'.
Show HN: Building the most comprehensive resume review system
The Project Job Scheduling example was terrible. We deleted it, and replaced it with the much cleaner Food Packaging quickstart.

Out of all our quickstarts, Project Job Scheduling is - by far - the one I am least proud of. It was overfitted for a particular problem and - in hindsight - it didn't align well to real-world variants of Job Shop Scheduling that many people face. But before Food Packaging, it was all we had.

Sorry for the pain. Thanks for sharing these insights.
Commenting out blocks of code with command-/ would be super useful as well
How can you repeat exactly what he said verbatim and then call him misinformed or trolling? I'm going to assume bad faith here and remind other readers that only a small portion of the country is productive and those people should be incentivized to work above all others, even if it means paying them.

This has been the status quo for a long time, rather than pay taxes and get it all back in controversial and bloated government contracts (which is what gives the appearance of government spending working) it's better to stay lean and just have them not pay, as this removes the middlemen.

Let a company do it's job and you get people crying about them raping the planet and exploiting workers

Stick a company with red tape, tax them a billion, give them (and yourself) a billion to complete a political project that goes nowhere and it's labeled a great success with people cheering in the street and using it as an example of socialist success for the next 60 years.
Consider the following visual phenomena / optical illusion:

https://michaelbach.de/ot/sze-silhouette/index.html

The silhoute may be perceived as rotating clockwise or counterclockwise.

There is not in fact enough information to determine which direction objectively.

Now suppose 2 types of experiments:

A) someone wears spy glasses and observes this effect, and is tasked to regularly speak out what direction (s)he perceives the figurine to spin. The spy glasses records what the subject sees, but also these remarks.

B) you observe this animation yourself, not wearing spy glasses, and you yourself speak out loud what direction you see the figurine spin, including occasional flips (which occur more frequently on faster / smaller variants of such animations)...

... now ...

Suppose you are watching a recording of someone else's A) variant, effectively you may be seen as a passive spectator of a prerecording of this other person. While watching this spy glass prerecording you would have your own interpretation (clockwise or not) and occasional flips of direction, at the same time you would be hearing this other person's interpretation, and you might agree with this other person half the time and not for half the other, the timing of the flips wouldn't correspond etc. Even guessing a coin toss will be correct half the time.

However if you yourself perform B) and speak for yourself, the statistics change, and the rotation direction your supposed 100% passive "mind" perceives corresponds with what your material body is speaking out loud all the time.

How do you explain that discrepancy in statistics? How was your brain and body able to systematically express what your supposedly 100% passive "mind" homunculus observed?

Hence you have "proven" your "passive mind spectator" to actually be active, and thus necessarily BE MEASURABLE. You come to the conclusion you are a materialist after all, even though the dualist simplifaction of the world is useful and pragmatic, you have shown it to be fundamentally wrong.

I wrote "proven" in quotes because you can't prove to a third person this correspondence between (counter)clockwise perception and verbalization.

But you have certainly proven this to yourself.
ok, so you prefer to select for scientists who don't mind playing games instead of focusing 100% of their mental capacity on delivering scientific outcomes.
Go binary size is not an issue, especially where the discussions is not related to browsers.
This is actually a very interesting insight, not only do you have to worry about sponsored results but people could game the system by spamming their library/language in a places which will be included in the training set of models. This will also present a significant challenge for security, because I can have a malicious library/package spam it in paths that will be picked up in the training set and have that package be referenced by the LLM.
that website is one of the most unresponsive one in a while
> Go has never focused on binary size and probably never will unless it actually becomes an issue for Google.

The Go project moved to being community directed quite a few years ago. The community hasn't shown it desperately needs smaller binaries either, though. It'd take them, I'm sure, but there are more important concerns.

> That's the disadvantage of having a corporate BDFL I guess.

Even if we, for the sake of discussion, assumed that Google still only specs the language for Google needs, there shouldn't be anything in the specification that necessitates large binaries. tinygo has shown that they can be small. And now that Microsoft has its own Go compiler, Google isn't the only deep pockets involved either. But so long as it is not seen as a pressing concern there isn't apt to be anyone to step up and put in the work to close the gaps.
Because the parts they don't like align with the parts DOGE doesn't like. They agree with dear leader and so all that woke BS is wasteful. This way they will pay lower taxes now because we got rid of all this "waste".
And the plane. I think. He just wants to travel the world over, stay at lavish places, eat great food, and hand with the powerful, on our dime.
Ruling out all Z is the almost-impossible part. It's hard to prove a negative, especially with incomplete information.
if it's not science why is it in the scientific grant?
By pretending the project is still alive (it's not, especially compared to the amount of changes in LibreOffice) they actively harm the users that heard about OpenOffice and use 10 years old abandonware, instead of the modern version of the office suite that it light years away. When user meets the problem that was fixed in LO long time ago, they might decide to switch to Microsoft or other paid alternatives instead, as everyone knows them. The only reasonable thing Apache should do is to archive the repository and put an announcement that users should use the LibreOffice instead.
Maybe, but why would they bother? If 80% of the demand is met by generating really good Python and generating really good X is a lot more work but only 2% of the demand it’s likely there isn’t going to be a reason to solve that problem well.
To Republicans, who use this word the most by far, it simply means "stuff I don't like". Biden is woke, bad movies are woke, science is woke, etc.

It's not that deep really, just a scarecrow they brandish everytime they want to discredit something, anything.
(Note: this is an explanation, not an endorsement or any form of support.)

These requirements are in place in part because the US wants to tax the income of US citizens no matter where they are in the world. So, they make requirements like FATCA and make requirements on foreign banks that amount to "we won't do business with you unless you impose these requirements on all US citizens (which inherently also means asking everyone if they're a US citizen)".
If developers factored the true cost of features into estimates then a lot less would get built. Instead, SMBs with tight budgets and long lists of feature requests go with the lowest bid or shortest time frame. Developers are incentivized to under-estimate because the business wants to hear that and if one shop won't, the competition will. Almost no one considers the underlying open-source infrastructure as a liability, let alone a duty to contribute towards. The first step to reduce bloat is to normalize estimates which include dependencies, maintenance, and growth.
Yes, you absolutely right. The goal is to identify and suppress people who care about anyone beyond themselves.
> There is an extremely high probability NYSE TX remains in Mahwah

> I wish one of these venues would have the conviction to put their whole kit in Dallas

To be fair, few people actually host in Mahwah or Carteret anymore. The HFT game is essentially closed, as the price of entry in terms of knowledge and capital is too high.

Most people just prefer a comfy Equinix DC with all modern amenities, where NYSE, Nasdaq and all other markets & brokers have a latency-stable point of presence, such as NY4.
LLM based AI tools are the new No/Low Code.
>How many proposals have been rejected simply because a scientist refused to shoehorn DEI language into a project that has nothing to do with it?

I'm all for studding that, but I honestly don't think the current administration actually cares... they care about any excuse for cuts.

I'm all for removing any requirement, but I don't agree that slapping a sentence means anything other than someone did what they thought would get them the grant.

I put "AI" in a project I'm working on for work, now I got attention, I don't "care" are about AI either way ;)