skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You either write the main program in C and call Ada libaries, or you write the main program in Ada and call C libaries: https://learn.adacore.com/courses/intro-to-ada/chapters/inte...

(And this seems pretty general; you'd have to do roughly the same thing to mix C/Rust, C/Pascal, Rust/Python, ...)
Cool to see Hawkeye 360 is one of their users. Hawkeye is an Earth observation company that builds satellites to monitor RF spectrum usage on the ground, so I can see how better tasking would help.
Centrefolded: Japan's 'porn disposal' boxes phased out amid rise of the internet
Yeah ok lol
Most budgeting advice sucks. It’s rigid, restrictive, and makes people feel broke even when they aren’t. After testing different savings strategies, I found a few behavioral hacks that make saving effortless and guilt-free.

No, it’s not about skipping lattes or extreme frugality. It’s about automating smart money habits, reframing spending psychology, and using fun challenges to grow wealth without deprivation.

Would love to hear how others approach saving—what’s worked for you?

Fun fact:
I'm in the middle of an experiment where I survive on home cooked food, not going out as much, and not spending money as much. That's what inspired me to write this.
I tried several of these but never really got see the lateral thinking because the solutions were trivial on the first guess. It feels like no effort went into the contents of the mysteries themselves and they were sourced using AI.

Which is to say, that they're all extremely shop-worn cliches. I think this shows the false allure of the AI product. The creator's low standards for content take what could be something interesting and a perfectly nice looking site and turns it into something which only superficially appears to be interesting but has no value.

I've noticed this a lot with AI-based products: even their creators don't find the experience good, but they are imagining there exists an audience which doesn't value graphics and doesn't value the written word.
>There are so many laws that basically everything is now illegal

this is really your best retort? Just dismissing 250 years of the constitution, interpretations of the constitution, case studies, and various federal laws passed along the way?

Fine, let's throw away everything except the good old constitution... it's still illegal in 1790.

>Under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the Constitution , Congress is granted the power to lay and collect taxes in order “ to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States. ”

These aren't some niche pockets of local law being defied here.
I somehow don't get the impression that his opponent, an older lady and the widow of a former president, was exactly into gangs, drugs, and the like. And similarly, I find it difficult to imagine that we couldn't vet the USAID candidate, a musician, to find his ties to such. Wiki apparently states he was well known for "cursing on stage, cross-dressing as well as using homophobic slurs." What a great guy to spend US taxpayer funds to promote. But the reality is that it's not about finding a good person, but about finding a person who will fulfill US interests.

By the way the same thing was true, to a smaller degree, of the Marshall Plan. 5% of all its funding went straight to CIA front organizations [1] helping to ensure Europe developed in the "right" way. The same thing continues today where USAID was doing all it could to try to undermine Hungary. It's like all this rhetoric about democracy being about the will of the people suddenly becomes meaningless when the will of the people is not equivalent to the will of the US. And I don't think this is conducive to a stable world order, to say the least.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Plan#Funding_for_CIA_...
Companies are not bound by law to extract as much as possible as soon as possible.
I have a theory that there's a limit to the human ability to be genuine, and "just be yourself" is not very meaningful, because all interpersonal communication is inescapably an act. Of course you can have sincere intent, and make a great effort to convey what you think is true, but this always has to be done in some kind of register, and so it's always a performance (however simple). Shrek tells us that ogres are like onions, but if you peel all the layers off an onion it vanishes.
All big things are actually just series of little things.

This is unfortunately a fact that’s easily obscured by the “clarity” of retrospection, through which big things look like obviously big things.
> no one is really expecting corporations to be genuinely decent

Speak for yourself. I do expect publicly-owned corporations to be decent, otherwise they do not deserve to be publicly owned. Unfortunately, it seems money gets in the way of that every day.
OP has raw text submissions from this domain on HN dating back a few years, so not it’s genuine enough!
Could you jam the bits into dummy ssl cert signing requests, then stick the result in the certificate transparency log?
Also you can go 60 in a 55.

Where is the executive order or written letter from the DOJ saying they have voided schedule I or speed limits?

Failure to enforce due to prioritization is not at all the same thing as the President saying a law no longer exists.
Getting a PhD in retirement is great if that's what floats your boat. (I know someone who basically did and another who did as sort of a mid-life crisis.) I don't think I'd have any interest because of all the BS associated with getting a credential. It does provide some structure around an activity. But I just can't personally imagine having that much structure unless I had a real objective in mind.
because higher education is too expensive to consider it
Life is expensive. I feel like you have to nail it financially to simply have a good life. It is not about the Ferraris.
Well, DOGE has the keys and the data. I'm not sure how this will not stay vulnerable if/when the dust settles.
Yeah, now that you mention it, Zed is saturating my CPU to 100% all the time now and it didn’t used to.

…that bothers me a little, but tooltips when moving over symbols via my keyboard drive me crazy—they often sit above an LSP autocomplete.

Overall I still like the editor, but I am definitely worried they’re going to focus on AI slop like everyone else and ignore the core experience.
Is my understanding correct that Trump (executive branch) currently has control of both congress and the senate via Republican majority? If so, what hope is there for a federal judge to rule reasonably on this case?
Actual lawsuit itself: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43044377
That military style uses little endian so it belongs in the sane formats category.

However, with ISO you're likely referring to RFC3339. The full ISO8601 standard allows insane date representations you're not going to see anywhere but the documentation that explains them.
Ask HN: Does trunk based development work?
Ok so here’s the thing, the more I read up stuff on making a team more effective, the more I see benefits of trunk based development(continuous deployment, faster feedback times etc)

However I’ve only seen it once and it was a shit show honestly.

I’d like to understand if anyone here is using trunk based development on their prod system, I.e someone does a small patch, writes some code and deploys it prod directly(maybe behind a feature flag).

How’s your system stability? How thorough are your tests, is is worth doing?

Why am I pursing this: My team unfortunately has VERY long drawn out release cycles and too many manual checkpoints(from release meetings to figuring out what should be release and what shouldn’t be) and its becoming a big problem.
This is coming to Serverless SQL warehouses soon!
Simulating physics of muscles/skeleton structures has been done many times over, and I feel like the focus on eyes and vision is what makes this one interesting. Anyway it's quite a fun category of youtube video: https://www.google.com/search?q=simulating+evolution+muscles They tend to be two-dimensional or have other big simplifications. I guess trying to evolve a "real" organism explodes in complexity very quickly even if you ignore the "brain".
Definition 6.1.1 and Proposition 6.1.2 ? The ones about bounded metric spaces?
The law specifically allowed for this extension, so I think you may be getting ahead of yourself.
Why are they entitled to the existing kernel? By what right?
Yah, I'm well familiar with the base rate fallacy and I still catch myself screwing it up. It's so unintuitive. I use mental math a lot to counter my intuition.

If sensitivity is high and the base rate is low, you can approximate it with .01 / (1-.91).

Or, mental math assuming 10,000 people is not unreasonable for your case (100 with disease, 90 true positives; 9900 * 9/100 false positives.. divide everything by 9 to make it easier, 10 true positives and 99 false positives, or 10/109 or say "9%".
>without any one of import actually going to jail.

I'd argue these kids won't "be of import" in the long scheme of things. Maybe in future software ethics/security classes at best. I sadly don't think Musk will ever be in a jailcell, but I'll settle for him never stepping foot in a federal facility again.
but only dragonfly's also possess the optimum flight capabilities
This case is likely to get fast-tracked to the SCOTUS.
I agree with you completely. If rust is so great why not make a new kernel with it and compete? or fork and start rewriting subsystems?

I do also understand the frustration when an open source project strings you along (me: can I join your club?), ask for this and that (them: sure if you pay your dues), ensuring your cover every "important" person's pet use case (them: and also buy us lunch), then publicly snark about the whole thing (them: this new guy know about no mustard on the lunch!) and kill your failing motivation (me: oh, sorry).

That's why the fork is so appealing. If it's good enough for long enough you get to join the club.
Companies can’t be non-cowards. Maximization of profits and fear of defunding is their nature. Reframing this as some sort of betrayal is delusion on the authors part, because companies never supported anything, they just played by the rules. And the rules were you’re going out of business if you ignore our ideas. Thinking that they supported anything out of good will is ignoring the reality of your own methods of change. You chose to force behaviors instead of organic assimilation, guess what happens when the force is gone. For the author, this should be the age of realization and working on mistakes.
So they carry neural nets and evolve using the NEAT algorithm, which introduces slight variations: new connections and new nodes.

Over time this allows fish to develop basic behavior such as searching for food, navigation a maze, etc.

The only other 'useful' gene right now is around herbivore/carnivore digestion (0 to 1), which allows them to extract more energy from either meat or plant-food. Most of the time they actually develop specific behavior according to this gene.

I don't really code in what offspring need to do beyond having slight variations to both factors described above, it kind of evolves randomly into more complexity (neural net + behaviors).

Also importantly– I need to program an energy decay system and death if they run out. So basically: Energy source, energy decay and evolving neural nets that can give an organism the possibility to survive and evolve if they get more energy. And voila– Life emerges.

Working on plants now, and again simple rules: Neural nets in the plants to mimic evolution of complex biological systems that evolve from generation to generation. And a light-based energy source and light-based energy capture system (leaves). My current (preliminary) experiments show that the plants start to look like trees over time to maximize energy capturing compared to competing plants.

Looking to publish this once I have it a bit more refined.
It helped me get a visa for Italy (I took part in a startup accelerator program).

Other than that not much else... I mean you learn things, but you could also learn things from watching YouTube, doing courses and reading books!

I've also seen people do PhD's and from the outside it seems like a lot of them did it just for the title - one of my friends though seems to love Academia and is now a professor.
Which is also in Trump's pocket, stacked with his buddies. Sigh.
> Asahi Linux is similar, given how hostile and undocumented Apple Silicon is, […]

«Undocumented» – yes, but «hostile» is an emotionally charged term that elicits a strong negative reaction; more significantly, though, it constitutes a flagrant misrepresentation of the veritable truth as stipulated within the resignation letter itself:

When Apple released the M1, I realized that making it run Linux was my dream project. The technical challenges were the same as my console homebrew projects of the past (in fact, much bigger), but this time, the platform was already open - there was no need for a jailbreak, and no drama and entitled users who want to pirate software to worry about.

Which is consistent with marcan's multiple previous blog posts and comments on here. Porting Linux (as well as NetBSD, OpenBSD) onto Apple Silicon has been no different from porting Linux/*BSD onto SPARC, MIPS, HP-PA and other platforms.

Also, if you had a chance to reverse-engineer a closed source system, you would have known that «hostile» has a very specific meaning in such a context as it refers to a system that has been designed to resist the reverse-engineering attempts. No such resistance has been observed on the Apple Silion computing contraptions.
Discussion (30 points, 56 minutes ago, 17 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43044223
We're getting close to banning vaccines: https://nbcmontana.com/newsletter-daily/proposed-bill-would-...
I’ve always thought it was crazy when either side said they were leaving the country based on who won the presidency.

Last time between moderate old school Republicans, business interest and the bureaucracy, they were able to keep Trump in check. But it is different this time.

Trump is no normal Republican and neither are his flunkies in Congress. I’ve seriously been looking at retiring to Costa Rica or Panama City. It’s stable. It’s relatively easy to become a permanent resident and buy into their health care system.
What I'm saying is that running WASM isn't an objective in itself. Just like running containers. Their site should tell me why I want to run WASM because I don't think I do.

Also your page is a list of things that support WASM, not ones that prefer or even value WASM (especially WASM outside the browser...)
Ideally, yes. Leaves little wiggle room, settles things with minimal bloodshed, and stamps a nigh objecive ruling.

But if blood is spilt, it'll slow things down in ways congress seems unable to do. Not stop, but slow down.
Agreed, but there is a suggested query to get you started at each step.
It was an EV summit, not about converting ICE to EVs. Even Biden's press secretary made it no secret that it was coz of unions(see quote below), as did a WSJ story after a couple of years quoting insider sources. Also Biden praised GM's Mary Barra as the pioneer of EVs, it was so bizarre, there's video.

> White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki was asked about Tesla’s absence at her briefing Thursday ahead of the event.

> “Well, we of course welcome the efforts of automakers who recognize the potential of an electric vehicle future and support efforts that will help reach the President’s goal, and certainly Tesla is one of those companies,” Psaki said. “I would not expect this is the last time we talk about clean cars and the move towards electric vehicles, and we look forward to having a range of partners in that effort.”

> Asked if Tesla being a nonunion company was the reason it wasn’t included Thursday, Psaki replied, “Well, these are the three largest employers of the United Auto Workers, so I’ll let you draw your own conclusions.”
> Anyone who doesn't suffer any real consequences. Having parents with a lot of money makes it not matter all that much.

You're not going to starve in America if you lose all your money.

Besides, Elon's dad at one point invested in Elon's company. Elon was already a success in business by then. From $20,000, he became the richest man in the world. All by luck! Pretty amazing!

Me, I could scrape up $20,000. Could I turn it into the richest man in the world? Nope. I would never have taken the risks Musk did. Nor do I have his work ethic. Nor am I as smart as he is. So I'm not envious of him.
Reasoning Best Practices
KQL has this as well. Quite helpful and can make it easier to show intent.
This is exactly why I decided to go do a PhD from industry.
Maybe every grant has a DEI component, because every grant is required to have a DEI component, or it will be desk rejected without review. But just because the grant has a DEI component doesn't mean that the actual project will have one.

Similarly, every grant comes with justifications and explanations about how the research would benefit the society. But everyone assumes that those are probably fake and only exist to satisfy politicians and administrators.
> they now live in a single-party dictatorship á la Russia and China where the rules are whatever the leader says they are, the better.

"single-party dictatorship" in the US? You need to read your comment again as this is just beyond hysterical.

You're telling everyone here that the Democratic Party currently has now ceased to exist and there is no opposition against the current administration.
Also don't ever jog down the street.

In fact, don't even sleep inside your own home!
Good. Nothing more wrathful than a Judge out for blood. let all the civil and criminal contempt fly out the aisles
It only allowed for the extension if TikTok had plans underway to diverse from ByteDance.

Not seen any reporting this is the case so we are relying on Trump's Executive Order to the DOJ to not enforce the ruling.

And it's in the context of JD Vance's recent statements that the Supreme Court should have no power to curtail the President's actions.
Yeah, there’s a huge difference between not enforcing federal laws and not enforcing federal laws.
Congress has spent many decades expanding the power of the president. This is what people have been warning about for a long time.

The best part is we already tried impeaching him in his first term. As long as at least 1/3rd of Senators support him there is no way to remove him from office.

Well, except a coup maybe. While normal soldiers swear allegiance to the president, officers only swear to protect the constitution. But that seems unlikely.
That was amusing to read, some interesting thoughts and reflections. I have no horses in this race - I don't write neither C nor Rust on a daily basis, can someone tell me about the current state of affairs, is there any Rust in the Linux kernel yet? Or the merits of that decision are still being disputed?
Ask HN: Do you think AI is being hyped by "Surprisers"?
Hi,HN

There is an internet meme in Japan called “Odrokiya(驚き屋)” who are overly surprised by the release of OpenAI and overstate the usefulness of AI.
Should we think of AI as being hyped by such people?
Show HN: I made something special for lovebirds this Valentine's Day
Hello HN!
I made a little something to help people cutely express their love.
Introducing heypookie.xyz – a fun way to pop the big question: Will you be my Valentine?
Try it, send it to your crush, your partner, or even your best friend – and make their day a little brighter.
Let me know what you think! Would love to hear your reactions and how it went!
> Now, if we go back to the hoarding; it's not about when someone didn't hoard, it's about the here and now. I'm pretty sure we can find a period of time where Gates or Kamprad didn't do any hoarding, or not the hoarding we'd expect. But concentration of anything doesn't really happen by accident, and wherever we see it now, we can assume it was intentional.

I’m no fan of Musk, but he clearly isn’t guilty of the hoarding aspect, as WalterBright pointed out.
As this project is geared toward "early modern prints", any recommendations for the best OCR/LLM solution for poor-quality typed manuscripts?
> and there is no opposition

There’s opposition everywhere, including places with single party rule.
Democratic Party does not control the Senate or House.

They have no ability to oppose anything.
What about plotly dash since it wraps react anyway?
Troll account is trolling.
Nice! The keyboard could be larger on mobile in portrait and landscape

Ctrl-Shift-M
https://devtoolstips.org/tips/en/simulate-devices/ ; how to simulate a mobile viewport:
https://developer.chrome.com/docs/devtools/device-mode#devic...

/? google lighthouse mobile accessibility test: https://www.google.com/search?q=google+lighthouse+mobile+acc...

Lighthouse:
https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/overview
Libreoffice features prominently in the "eurostack" initiative/proposal that was launched today. If there will be ever mainstream self-sovereign compute, it will almost certainly include this incredible project.

The nag I will always repeat: libreoffice should have made much bigger, much sooner, strides to integrate the Python ecosystem in deep ways (striking on its own and ignoring Microsoft's path).

Had it done so, it would now undisputably own the desktop productivity future, with local LLM integration just the trendy example.
>Let's not pretend this wasn't the likely conclusion and voters were solely focused on the price of eggs.

Maybe I'm still naive, but I believe maybe 30-40% (At least) of trump voters simply 1) really wanted immprovements in their lives or 2)thought any pf the negatives of trump would not happen to them. Trump got the simple votes and discorded such people promptly. We'll see how long they, one by one, realize such a fact.

Likewise, I doubt that many supporters voted with the idea that Trump would be put back in as a Sino-Ruso puppet. They would dimiss any such talk as conspiracy, no matter how many calls he makes/takes from Putin and how many docs he mishandles.
The squished logs sounds like what Subversion does with merges. OpenOffice looks to have used Subversion for a while.
Engineers who won't commit force bad decisions
Factor graphs are well discussed in David Barber's excellent free BRML book: http://web4.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/D.Barber/textbook/140324.pdf

Judea Pearl described it as an excellent Bayesian textbook. There's a free solutions book and everything is also implemented.
Though most of the comments are about Trump, I’m happy to see TikTok back (for now). I don’t think Trump ignoring the law is the answer or the right way to go about this, but I’ll take it for now if it keeps TikTok around. What’s most shocking to me, whether you think TikTok should be banned or not, is that Congress was so willing to act directly against the interests of more than half of Americans.
Ocr is well and good, i thought it was mostly solved with tesseract what does this bring? But, what I’m looking for is a reasonable library or usable implementation of MRC compression for the resulting pdfs. Nothing i have tried comes anywhere near the commercial offerings available, which cost $$$$ . It seems to be a tricky problem to solve, that is detecting and separating the layers of the image to compress separately and then binding them
Back togethr into a compatible pdf.
Not going to argue this fact, but would we have seen progress like this policy if not for the tantrum?

Genuine question, I have not followed closely.
That doesn't exactly strike me as a bad thing? Isn't that sort of the point of open source? Lots of people working on the things that interest them and through a diversity of interests arriving at a useful project?
I've wondered the same thing myself. The rabies virus takes the same route to the brain. Once it gets there, 99% of victims die.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabies