skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The problem is they're both doing it wrong. The way you protect consumers is with a competitive market and a low rate of fraud. So the government is primarily responsible for preventing market consolidation and prosecuting fraud.

The problem in the US is that they don't do either of those things well and then you get consolidated markets that are insulated from competition or competitive markets where fraud is rampant, and the latter tend to become the former because a high rate of fraud causes people to turn to major brands to protect themselves until the market consolidates.

The problem in Europe is that they not only don't prevent market consolidation, they pass rules that make it worse. You don't need to micromanage how stuff is made or how people interact with each other as long as you have competitive markets and informed consumers, because then people just don't patronize abusive businesses because they both have alternatives and know about them. But if you do micromanage everything then compliance costs go up, which are fixed costs that increase barriers to entry into the market, which reduces competition and then you're screwed again. The best case there is cost disease where everything costs an order of magnitude more than it should because everyone is paying for an army of bureaucrats to check boxes, but even more common is that you get that and abusive cartels that take advantage of consumers in every way that hasn't already been regulated. Which becomes a vicious cycle where more abuses lead to more regulations which lead to higher costs and even more market consolidation.
Spec-Driven Vibe-Coding
The context problem is really annoying when using go. Many functions unnecessarily adding a context parameter so they can cancel a task. They made such nice syntax sugar for channels, why not also context?
> If I write it, they will come. They won’t. There are billions of blog posts out there. The internet is an infinite void, and your blog is a whisper in a hurricane.

This has not proven to be true over a long enough window.

I've kept a blog of some kind since 2005 and I'm always surprised looking at the traffic what posts get picked up by Google and end up driving traffic for one reason or another. One of my posts is prominent enough that I recently started to notice inbound traffic from ChatGPT (I assume it is being cited as authoritative on the subject).

A few years back, I started on Medium with 0 readers and just started writing. 100 ticked by and it was a small milestone. Then 500, then 1000. Just write in your authentic voice; don't think about an audience.

There are literally thousands of videos on recipes for omelettes (example) on YT, yet more are published every day. The thing is, there's a video and a voice for every audience.
What happens if a customer made a hasty negative review but the vendor reached out and genuinely resolved/fixed the issue?
Sooo happy to read that it's back! These people who work hard to keep these types of websites online for decades and decades are my absolute heroes
"Better" is relative. As I've found out from other comments, "better" requires rooting your TV, so it's actually worse from a usability perspective, in no case is rooting your TV and sideloading apps any better than simply installing an app from the TV vendor's app library.
This looks like a potential great tool but it needs a better summary of what it can do and how it works. I can't quite grasp it from the readme.

I use a mix of setxkbmap to remap the control key and AutoKey but each has its issues.
Can this replace those?
For scalar CPUs, historically CMOV used to be relatively slow on x86, and notably for reliable branching patterns (>75% reliable) branches could be a lot faster.

cmov also has dependencies on all three inputs, so if there's a high level of bias towards the unlikely input having a much higher latency than the likely one a cmov can cost a fair amount of waiting.

Finally cmov were absolutely terrible on P4 (10-ish cycles), and it's likely that a lot of their lore dates back to that.
So, having read through the thread a few days after participating, and being more or less fully on the anti-current-actions camp by DOGE, I think raiyner is actually doing a pretty strong job presenting the facts as he, she, or they see it.
We addressed these concerns while developing Coze, a cryptographic JSON messaging specification. The specification details how we chose to address these concerns.

https://github.com/Cyphrme/Coze
Very cool. I've lived in and spent a ton of time in Mexico city , and this is really on-point. Would love to see more of these.
Whatever else you may think of Jimmy Wales, the fact that he has resisted temptation to turn Wikipedia into a mega-profitable ad-powered site or sell to Google or someone else is pretty unprecedented in recent tech history. Could have easily joined the "tres commas club".
You won't be ready for what AI is about to do to human sexuality/romantic tendencies.

You think the war of the sex's is bad now? Just wait until a man or woman can literally buy a human-like android which never says no.

I anticipate things like the marriage rate, partnership rates, dating rates and similar to further crater compared to where they are now. Human based marriages will be the minority by the end of the century, likely far before it.

Almost no policy makers consider this, but it's clearly staring us in the face. Go see civit.ai to see de-facto what people learned how to use adapter/lora models for. The overwhelming majority of text-to-image content and plurality of text-to-video created today by AI is hardcore NSFW.
What a cool and novel concept! Bummed and a little surprised it's the first time I've heard of it. I wish there were a browsable directory index of cool projects such as CoLinux.

Reading the description definitely set of bells in my head reminding me of the venerable Cygwin, though CoLinux could comparatively have potentially more capabilities and upsides since there is a fully resident kernel running.

CoLinux hasn't pushed a new release since 2011 and no commits since 2012. Was the project death a byproduct of WSL [1], or what happened?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Subsystem_for_Linux
hahahaha Deutsche Welle credible source????? hahahahhaha
Also what happens to a user whose hard drive is seized (and forensic tools are used) to find deleted files? Hard to believe (and why would they) take time to properly sanitize the drives.
Yup, I'm talking about another alphabet.
Sounds cool! In fact, this can be applied to other areas such as "debate monitoring" for debate competitions
Yet, the first thing that was ever bought online was cannabis.
I came here for Cell Broadband Engine Architecture and was very excited about the whole zombie idea -_-
It is interesting how the field is becoming 'pedagogy of LLMs'.
As an historical artifact this is interesting but I wonder why we don't do this for say Andrew Wyeth. Is it because the general public doesn't recognize the difference between Pollock's work and the mess on the floor. What makes Art art and not erosion is intention. If you look closely at a Pollock you see splotches doing impossible DeKooning tricks going over and under each other like they were all laid down at one time -- not in succession. This is the magic of "Action Painting". If there are moments like these in that floor they're not considered or on purpose. Why and how do we build cults of personality around people who create things we don't understand? To many people this is Einstein too. It's no wonder so many Americans feel comfortable with anti-intellectualism and ignoring experts when they can't recognize the qualities of something that makes it good or praiseworthy and are then lied to about the artistic value of drips on a floor.
All the major technology companies have special isolated security clearance offices. Most regular employees including managers and directors do not and cannot know what's going on in those places. Secrecy is priority. In the US it's a requirement to never discuss security clearance if you have security clearance.

The banal non-conspiracy explanation is these employees work for military and government clients on regular products but with their classified data.
What's the difference between the stack and a thread-local, constantly hot/in-cache other region of the same memory? Especially that in many cases the objects are allocated right next to each other, so fetching happens from cache again. Not saying that expertly written Rust code can't beat naive Java one, and especially with the object headers Java will have a performance disadvantage in many cases - but that's a tiny disadvantage in most real-world use cases, multiple times offset by its advantages.

(Besides, Java has on-stack replacement which can do the exact same thing as rust does, but the JIT-compiler Gods have to be in the correct alignment for that)
People here should read, especially 1.How to make less datasets 2. Categorize reasoning process into
L1-L5 when evaluation.
what's the connection here? just the words "less is more"?
Yes, that would be great. It's not always benefical, but in some (rare, but for me important) cases it's better. Currently, the only way to ensure a conditional move is used, is to use inline assembly. This is not portable and also less maintainable than a "proper" solution.
3DS HOS was known to be using armcc and Switch HOS is known to be using clang.

Both OSes are huge C++ codebases. Features being disabled or forbidden is a non-userland thing (basically only because resources are constrained. 20KB of exception runtime bload isn't the same thing when you only have 200KB of available RAM vs. when you have 20MB+)

My opinion (and the opinion of people using C++ in such constrained envs.):

* C++ (the language itself along with stuff like <type_traits> and other freestanding headers) is the best thing since sliced bread. So many ways of reducing boilerplate while both writing safe code (RAII) and being mostly in control of produced asm

* most of the other parts of the stdlib are defective

* the committee process sucks, but fortunately compiler vendors allow us to dodge their bad decisions (making #embed available for C++, -fno-exceptions, etc.)
I think the way to swallow this bitter pill is to acknowledge they can "generalize" because all human knowledge is actually a relatively "small" finite distribution that models are now big enough to pattern match on.
Here's this too!

https://www.emuvr.net/

I was hoping RetroFab was going to be electro-mechanical games.

You might like this music video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVDaT6b8Lbc
Rebooting The Pentagon
This is the 9th time in the last 2 days that this has been posted:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42992019

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42991799

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42988028

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42982964

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42981756

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42981120

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42980445

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42979187

The HN community's thoughts on the matter seem pretty clear.
Probably correct for OP to present as "Tim Apple" (hence giving some kind of hint to reflect on)
Really enjoying this. Thank you for the great work. I'm currently on Lesson 11 and noticed a couple typos (missing words). I haven't found anywhere on the site itself where I could send feedback to report such a thing (maybe I missed it). Hopefully you aren't offended if I post them here.

I think the easiest way to point them out is to just have you search for the partial line of text while on Lesson 11 and you'll see the spots.

"No one is going to motivated by a robotic..." (missing the word "be")

"People who are given a possible solution to a problem tend to less creative at..." (again missing the word "be")
Where it's going is largely irrelevant I suppose. The only reason the "doge" thing is going on is because Elon needed a way to insert himself into the government, and everybody else involved is too technically inept to realise (or care).

But the effects don't really matter because this is what the American public voted for. As an outsider who's read Daemon and Freedom when are you yanks gonna start the darknet already?
Thank god the Europeans have never killed anyone.
https://archive.ph/1HnMj
My guess: In real world scenarios, there’s overhead such swap space and virtual memory, analogous to a cache miss.

A full mark—and-sweep GC would have deal with this extra overhead.

Whereas a generational GC would reduce the amount of a miss because it only considers a subset of objects; and the least likely bit of memory in the disk/slower swap space are the most recently allocated objects.
That was the easy laughter set-up line. The follow-up seemed to confound the audience.

What was the follow-up?
It's for the same reason you feel dead after eating a pound of sugar, and compounded with extra dehydration. Take it from a former professional alcoholic, drink your water and take your B vitamins.
For 1, they apply non-reasoning model then apply reasoning model.
We, or them?
Wow, and I thought the quality of education in the US couldn't get any worse...
"of course real branches happen in GPU code"

My understanding was that they don't. All executions inside a "branch" always get executed, they're simply predicated to do nothing if the condition to enter is not true.
It's unlikely, but theoretically such offers constitutes a non-disparagement/NDA contract, which means if you break the contract by leaving a 1 star review they can go after you in court and probably win.
You don't need a perfect score, you just need enough points to pass. There's no reason to cheat on every question, just enough of them
> in other words, encode the JSON being signed as a string. This would then ensure that, even if the "outer" JSON is parsed and re-encoded, the string is unmodified. It'll even survive weird parsing and re-encoding, which the regex replacement option might not (unless it's tolerant of whitespace changes).

Would it be guaranteed to survive even standard parsing?

It wouldn’t surprise me at all, for example, if there are json parsers out there that, on reading, map “\u0009" and “\t" to the same string, so that they can only round-trip one of those strings. Similarly, there’s the pair of “\uabcd” and “\uABCD”. There probably are others.
Kinda similar to how Anthropic was able to achieve golden gate Claude or even maximize/minimize features like “buggy code” via analyzing concepts in activations and manipulating them[0].

[0]: https://www.anthropic.com/news/mapping-mind-language-model
Apparently it was a strike by Spanish contributors that stopped his original plan to use adverts, so props to them.

https://www.wired.com/story/wikipedia-spanish-fork/

I was always mildly suspicious of Jimmy Wales but he seems to have done well. Considering what a grifter his co-founder Larry Sager has become, he's a saint by comparison.
I've never understood why Marie Curie is so celebrated in the popular press, but Noether is largely ignored. Noether's work is much more important, IMHO.
> It’s really an ideal term to describe what LLMs do.

Only when you relax it to the point it also describes what most people do.

To be specific: if by "truth" you mean objective, verifiable truth, and by "caring about truth" you mean caring about objective, empirically verifiable evidence, then by far most people are mostly only ever trying to be persuasive.
Show HN: I made a Kotlin REPL with multiline editor, highlighting and completion
I’ve created a Kotlin REPL for the terminal with support for multiline code editing, interconnected cells, code completion, and error highlighting.
Chris Chan is an abusive person and has been for a very long time (before the "internet found him", he was making rape threats against girls in his highschool.) He freaks people out for good reason. It's not fair to autistic people to use Chris Chan as some sort of archetype for autism.
Mass flaggers who don't want to discuss things are not representative of "the community".
censorious appears to mean 'severely critical of others'. I expect they meant 'censoriously', with the full intent being that the embarrassment felt by the critical reactions of others when reading the instructions out loud will cause you to eliminate or fix obviously broken, complex or tedious processes that you had, until then, just quietly been putting up with.
Are you sure? As soon as you add actual computations in you're heading through the whole execution pipeline & forwarding network, tying up ALUs, etc. Zicond can probably be handled without all that.

Also that isn't actually equivalent since `x` needs to be all 1s or all 0s surely? Neither GCC nor Clang use that method, but they do use Zicond.
I thought the article was quite clear about this. They thought turtles mostly followed currents but it turns out they swim their own route.
> Human crowds have very fluid-like behavior, but of course they don't behave perfectly like a liquid in a pipe

Hypothetically, how would the dynamic change if it were a crowd of cats instead?
Tell HN: Notion's Fraudulent Sunset of Skiff
Skiff was sunset after being acquired by Notion but we were promised email forwarding would continue to be available until the 9th of February, 2025 (https://skiff.com/data-migration) for those of us that could not immediately access accounts linked to a Skiff email, with support still available through support@skiff.org.

Both have turned out to be complete lies. support@skiff.org only responds with an automated acknowledgement but is otherwise dead, not responding to even refund requests. This has been the case for over 4 months (https://old.reddit.com/r/skiffmail/comments/1g3gqgy/skiff_support).

Forwarding does not work because in about that same time, Notion has refused to fix Skiff's certificate issues (https://old.reddit.com/r/skiffmail/comments/1h2ob1g/forwarding_error_response), trapping those of us with accounts linked to Skiff.

To add insult to injury, contacting Notion (team@makenotion.com) has proved fruitless the last month as they respond with barely coherent, AI-generated garbage that says to still email the dead support@skiff.org but with a different subject. Their official subreddit (https://old.reddit.com/r/skiff) is dead and only the unofficial subreddit is left.

I have exhausted all other options so this is my last ditch attempt to avoid permanently losing my account trapped by Notion's Skiff.
Dreaming of Atlantis
Show HN: JSON Nexus, Simple data and communication API
Don't waste your time. Learn a language and see how Gen AI writes it so you can understand how to manually fix it in 5 years. There will be money in this after people forget how to do it and Gen AI has overwritten all the real resources about it on the internet. Unless you're actually interested in LLM and not making money...
Anyone who likes the trippy views that a kaleidoscope shows ought to pick up a teleidoscope. It has the same internal reflective structure, but instead of colored bits of glass/plastic at the end, it has a fisheye lens to the outside world. They're quite fun to look through, since you get to pick from an endless array of shapes and color palettes by just pointing it at different things. A bit of searching will turn up shopping results for under $10.
> the GC very rarely interferes with my applications SLO

Somewhat random data point, but coraza-waf, a WAF component for e.g. Caddy, severely regresses on larger payloads and the GC scaling issues are a major contributor to this. In another data point, Twitch engineering back in the day had to do incredibly silly tricks like doing huge allocations at the application start to balloon the heap size and avoid severe allocation throttling. There is no free lunch!

Go's GC also does not scale with cores linearly at all, which both Java and .NET do quite happily, up to very high core counts (another platform that does it well - BEAM, thanks to per-process isolated GCs).

The way Java GCs require an upfront configuration is not necessarily the only option. .NET approach is quite similar to Go's - it tries to provide the best defaults out of box. It also tries to adapt to workload profile automatically as much as possible. The problem with Go here is that it offers no escape hatches whatsoever - you cannot tune heap sizes beyond just limits, memory watermark, collection aggressiveness and frequency, latency/throughput tradeoff and other knobs to fit your use case the best. It's either Go's way or the highway.

Philosophically, I think there's an issue where if you have a GC or another feature that is very misuse-resistant, this allows badly written code to survive until it truly bites you. This was certainly an issue that caused a lot of poorly written async code in .NET back in the day to not be fixed until the community went into "over-correction". So in both Java and C# spaces developers just expect the GC to deal with whatever they throw at it, which can be orders of magnitude more punishing than what Go's GC can work with.
You are comparing very old Java if you had to touch anything else than heap size.

Especially that Java's GCs are by far the very very best, everything else is significantly behind (partially because other platforms may not be as reliant on object allocation, but it depends on your usecase)
"My Fair Llama"
or
"Pygmallm"
I'm going to go on a limb and claim the author is aware:

https://www.shadertoy.com/user/iq
I like that Nintendo DS Game & Watch Collection is included, so we are basically playing an emulation of an emulation :)

Also, I never knew Game & Watch were cloned by Elektronika. It's funny to see what are almost the exact same games with subtle differences (e.g. "Octopus" vs "Ocean Secrets").
So perhaps bullets would be the best store of value?
Wikipedia is as legitimate as they get, but that doesn't mean it's perfect. Readers should be aware of its bias in which sources it allows (which has knock-on effects on which facts and stories cannot be included because no "reliable" sources report on them, while left-leaning sources are unmotivated to report them):

Wikipedia’s list of deprecated sources currently contains 16 right-leaning sources: Breitbart, the Daily Caller, the Daily Mail, the Daily Star, the Epoch Times, FrontPage Magazine, the Gateway Pundit, Infowars, LifeSiteNews, News of the World, One America News Network, the Sun, Taki’s Magazine, VDare, WorldNetDaily, and Zero Hedge – and just one left-leaning source, Occupy Democrats. Other politically biased sources have also been deprecated, but it is harder to position them on the left-right political axis, such as media companies controlled by the Russian or Chinese government.

...

but a similar standard has not been applied to lower quality, left-leaning sources such as CounterPunch, AlterNet, and the Daily Kos.

According to Ad Fontes Media‘s widely-used media bias chart (which is commonly cited in discussions on the reliable sources noticeboard), CounterPunch, AlterNet, and the Daily Kos are all less reliable than the Daily Mail. This is significant because the Daily Mail, a deprecated right-leaning source, is often used as a benchmark for judging whether other right-leaning sources should be deprecated. All three of these left-wing sources are widely used at Wikipedia.

https://thecritic.co.uk/the-left-wing-bias-of-wikipedia/
I’d argue that the VP himself is greater threat to this country than his Apple Watch.