skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is more about simplicity, maintainability, and possiblity for new contributors to easily jump in and fix things. Our current parser is not fun for new contributors to learn. Also, I think parser combinators obsficate a lot of the tracking required for robust error messages.

Personally, I find parser combinators nice for small things but painful for large and robust things.
This tweet of his does not inspire confidence

https://x.com/Quaker_Opes/status/1886596488505053618
"Conglom-O: We Own You."

...Just to highlight the absurdity of the situation. Literally cartoonish corruption.
Here's What We Achieved!

All the insights from recent... "Hack the Future: AI & Open Source Hackathon".

Platform: Devpost from 24th to 27th January, 2025.
307 registered hackers from Africa, Europe, Oceania, Asia, North & South America
73 groundbreaking projects submitted
$4,515 in prizes, including crypto coins
13 carefully-selected judges
3 YC-backed founders joined as mentors/ judges
1 ML Engineering Researcher with multiple publications
3 live workshops to boost your skills
0 marketing – just pure passion via LinkedIn & Twitter
1 main sponsor AI/ML API - Startup that raised $3M.
First-time organizers bringing you end-to-end tutorials in various programming languages, all crafted by our founder
Small but mighty organizing team

A HUGE thank you to everyone who participated and made this hackathon a success! Stay tuned for more innovative events!

Shoutout to Vladislav Shakhrai, Aashutosh Sapkota, Sergey Nuzhnyy, Wei B Tan

Show Up your project and Tag and Follow Open Community!!

All the submitted projects are here: https://lnkd.in/gQDJ5W9y

PS: Should we do another hackathon in February?
Only at odds if you assume the behavior is gendered and not a response or effect of the dating community in general - homosexual sub communities could have lots of community effects that change this up, just like heterosexual communities differ.
Seriously - not sure what they were thinking - but this confuses the hell out of everyone (especially if they have the Apple TV+ app installed on their smart TV directly and an Apple TV physical box hooked to the same TV)
The 2009 fact is commercial US airlines, specifically
I don't think it's relevant in this case. But it's a well known internet law

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cunningham%27s_Law
It would really hard to believe that Google and Facebook do comply with the (spirit of the) GDPR and deletes all personal data when it is no longer necessary. That would simply go against their business model.

Anyways, GDPR doesn't protect your data, it just specifies how companies can use it. So all my name, address, phone number, etc. will still be stored by every webshop for 10 years or so just waiting to be breached (because some tax laws).
I optimized heavily on good photos. It worked for me, YMMV.
Don’t you need to get iCloud+ if you want to have more than 5GB iCloud storage? I would guess it’s probably
more than 80% of users.
Sorry, but I don't see any dancing girls, so this app is not for me I guess
Is "AI appstore" envisioned on Linux edge inference hardware, e.g. PC+NPU, PC+GPU, Nvidia Project Digits? Or only in the cloud?

Apple probably wouldn't accept a 3rd-party AI app store on MacOS and iOS, except possibly in the EU.

If antitrust regulation leads to Android becoming a standalone company, that could support AI competition.
Tear gas is illegal to use in war because of a fear of escalation/retaliatory strikes due to an enemy thinking you're using other more dangerous chemical/biological weapons (chlorine, sarin, mustard, phosgene, etc).

It's not banned in war because it's as dangerous as chemical weapons, it's banned in war so people don't think you're using chemical weapons.
What I hate about Tinder is that it has become the only way to find woman for sex and for relationship, even if with miserable probabilities. Even in my tiny non English speaking country. The man has to pay for the app. Women ending up on Tinder loathe how despicable the app is ("looking for a pearl in this cesspool", "don't believe I ended up here" etc.) while somehow don't notice that they make this place this way.
Whenever I read huge productivity boost for developers or companies I shiver. Software sucked more and more even before LLMs, I don't see it getting better just getting out faster maybe. I'm afraid in most cases it will be a disaster
>The richest ones with the most land won’t be affected nearly as much as the small guys

are you saying they will all lose the same stock on a weighted basis, but rich ranchers can last longer all the while losing money till they too are small ranchers with a wolf problem?
I don't disagree with what you state, but I don't think most who are surprised now are ready to ponder systems of governance and cooperation that require less trust than those most used now so i won't go there here.
Email has the stigma of all the junk/grey mail, spam and scam attempts that come in via it - people want to not have to filter through as much of that and for the most part these chat apps solve that problem.

It doesn't help that Outlook's search capabilities have gotten effectively useless - I can type in search terms that I'm literally looking at in my inbox and have it return no results, or have it return dozens of hits without the search terms involved at all. I don't have that problem with Slack or Teams.

However, I think you are right overall on email being better overall for what people end up using chat apps for.
https://sequelize.org/docs/v6/core-concepts/paranoid/
Be the product or the caged golden goose. We sure have a choice, but I personally don't see one that much better than the other.

When Tim Cook testifies that Apple is entitled to all our digital transactions, I don't think they have a better moral stance.
There has been a buzz of having "computerized, automated ATC" since, well, forever. It's like the flying car of the aviation world. I don't know if the government still hopes that is "right around the corner" so they don't really want to ramp up hiring. I mean, look ChatGPT can solve math problems already, surely it can funnel planes into an airport... /s

There certainly some automation involved, but not at the level where we can just let the all the people go home and have it take over.
For sure, but we have a really good relationship with the zig folks and they are willing to help us out.

On top of that, zig has gotten a lot more robust and stable of the last few releases. Upgrading is getting smoother.

But yeah, it is a risk.
I respectfully disagree - there's always money in the banana stand.
Their project literally killed innocent people.
Racially discriminatory SBA loans and affirmative action in colleges also are deeply unpopular, but Democrats keep pursing those policies because they’re important to a portion of their coalition.

Trump is the first Republican in memory that understands coalition politics (because he was a Democrat). Most republicans don’t like Gabbard and/or RFK Jr. But, like Musk, they were advertised as part of the package deal and Trump voters satisfied themselves they could live with it.
Unless you're a teen in the USA.

Non-iPhone users are the minority in this demographic (<= 13%), see my demographic comment elsewhere for this subject.
The entire point of Human ATC is that those rules are breached regularly in normal operations and we still expect traffic to be routed safely despite that

One complaint I've seen is that the ATC should not have let the helicopter do visual spacing in that regime, that it was somewhat careless and unsafe and possibly discouraged. If the ATC operator was overloaded with work, they would be incentivized to "outsource" the spacing management to the helicopter who would then be able to screw it up by "seeing" the wrong plane. I can see the merits of the argument but it would take the NTSB to have the right knowledge to confirm or deny it.
I understand what you’re saying but as another commenter pointed out, many ranchers are in incredible debt. The same is for farmers. You get trapped in a cycle you can’t break from without a miracle.
They implied that he meant Microsoft's financials were in trouble, when he was more saying that Microsoft had become the new IBM.

I don't think Macs are popular in tech merely due to frivolous or circular fashion. Basically no one used Windows to do 2009-2016 era web dev. Not because founders were pushing employees to use Macs so investors would see when they came to visit; Microsoft genuinely lost a lot of reputation among programmers prior to the WSL stuff due to how bad their stuff was. Am I the only one who remembers this? People complaining and giving each other a look if they had to use "Winblows" and so on? (I still see this today.)

> Was it really necessary to come to his defense? ...

I mean, no, but why does every PG essay posted on here spawn a bunch of comments about basically how rich and pretentious he is? Why does this matter? If he's wrong, why not just say why?
Yes it is, but you have to be careful with bait and switches where they change the license from OSS to source available or proprietary closed source.
I described how I liked doing ping-pong pairing TDD with Cursor elsewhere. One of the benefits of that approach is that I write at least half the implementation and tests and review every single line. That means that there is always code that follows the patterns I want and it's right there for the LLM to see and base its work on.

Edit: fix typo in last sentence
What's your point? That my friends aren't the literal best in the world in their field of study? Of course they aren't.
If that was a job requirement, there would be like 20 job openings world-wide.

What an odd comment.
Is it so hard to believe that some people do not want to mix software advocacy with political advocacy? It no more bad faith than people arguing that they want to keep their professional life and personal life separate.

I find it much easier to trust Debian if they don't involve themself with world politics and focus on software freedoms. Same with a company if they focus on being a company rather than a political advocacy.
Don't get a professional headshot, of course!

But you absolutely should have someone who knows how to make you look as good as possible in a natural environment.

You should also have a woman friend critically evaluate your profile. (If you don't have a friend you trust, you should first make sure you can make trusted friends with women who will tell you the truth.)
OpenAI’s Deep Research redefines AI autonomy, enabling near-independent execution of complex research tasks. By synthesizing data, generating reports, and optimizing workflows with minimal human intervention, it marks a shift toward intelligent automation. While currently cloud-based, its evolution into a locally operated AI system could revolutionize security, customization, and enterprise control.
Unless you use their inferior web version that pressures you into also getting an iphone.
This answer probably explains the urban-rural divide just as well as wolves do. Photography is a hobby for most which turns into a career for some. If it doesn't work out like it didn't for you it is easy to just go back to hobby photography. Farming, ranching and forestry is a life for most, a career for many. If it doesn't work out you lose your farm, ranch or forest holding and will have to find another life.
> executives, directors and managerial staff think the opposite

Executives, directors, and managerial staff have had their heads up their own asses since the dawn of civilization. Riding the waves of terrible executive decisions is unfortunately part of professional life. Executives like the idea of LLMs because it means they can lay you off; they're not going to care about your opinion on it one way or another.

> Being very anti-LLM code instead of trying to understand how it can improve the speed might be detrimental for your career.

You're making the assumption that LLMs can improve your speed. That's the very assumption being questioned by GP. Heaps of low-quality code do not improve development speed.
My autistic kid and my whole family rely on Medicaid while we have no income. Is it worth my kid not having their necessary treatments to save a few thousand bucks? Any MAGA want to answer me as to why this is a good thing? I served America for a decade in the military and now I’ll lose my home and medical coverage and my son will back slide and probably never recover. I’m also a disabled veteran, so when do they cut those benefits? Will I lose the money I currently use to pay for food, too?

Tell me, was this worth it to own the libs? I want to yell at you MAGA folks but I don’t want to get banned here, so I’m being as nice as possible but I really hate you guys right now.

Edit: instead of pressing downvote why don’t you cowards speak?
This is a general objection to AI responding to real world events in general : "What if something unexpected happens?" It comes up in self driving as well. Things like "What if something suddenly appears in the middle of the road" or "Can it drive in snow conditions with zero visibility?

My question is, how do you know that in general human beings respond better to unexpected or very complex / difficult situations than an automated system would? Yes, human beings can improvise, but automated systems can have reaction times more than an order of magnitude faster than that of even the quickest humans.

I'd like to see some statistics on the opposing hypothesis : How good are humans, really, when encountering unexpected situations? Do they compare better with automated systems in general?

Here's a competing hypothesis: An automated system can incorporate training data based on every recorded incident that has ever happened. Unless a situation is so unexpected that it has literally never happened in the history of aviation, an AI system can have an example of how to handle that scenario. Is it really true that the average human operator would beat this system in safety and reliability? How many humans know how to respond to every rare situation that has ever happened? It's at least possible that the AI does better on average.
Oh noes, what happened?
6 out of 10 male here (on looks), if that. Got about 300 matches, because I understand social systems and have a hacker mindset. Ultimately, met my wife after 30 dates. Didn't expect that.

> Throwing money at apps works. I'm not going to go into details because my opinion is not based on anything other than my opinion, but I found that the more I spent on the apps, the more dates I would get.

I've experienced that too.

> Modern dating when compared to traditional dating offline is not even the same thing. Ghosting and talking romantically to multiple people is normal. You can't let yourself get emotionally attached to anyone until you actually know them or expect anything from them.

Similar experience.
why would it be a joke?
Looks interesting, might play with it and the C# client soon, do you plan to build a LINQ provider eventually or keep the APIs similar across client languages?
Thank you for raising your voice. Especially when these necessary conversations are being so heavily suppressed here on HN
But I want bad things to happen to bad people...

I agree with restorative justice, but the people using a law as a weapon do not so I hope they see the same mercy they show their victims.
It's completely different. If I start writing an itertools library with comptime inlining and my favorite selection of other features, completing map/reduce/take/skip/... exactly how I want them to look, LLM autocomplete can finish the rest of the library exactly as would have written it even for languages it doesn't otherwise know well, outside of the interesting bits (in the context of itertools, that'd be utilities with memory tradeoffs, like tee and groupby).
It's not "histrionics"; they tried it last time and they'll try it again. This time they seem more organized, so I wouldn't be surprised if they succeed. If you care about the US remaining a functioning democracy, you should work in whatever way you can toward removing the current administration from power.
That's a good point and I do agree in principle.

But there still needs to be some mechanism to limit wealth inequality or we still get the inevitable conclusion.

The US minimum wage hasn't changed in 16 years!

Which means many of these peak performers are built on the back of poverty, people who don't have the luxury of "freely agreeing" to take their labor elsewhere.

It's just not fair at all. Governments are funneling money to the rich hand over fist. It's obvious who they represent and who they don't.

You have to agree that trickle down is not trickling down.
> asking it to fix it again works just well enough.

I've yet to encounter any LLM from chatGPT to cursor, that doesn't choke and start to repeat itself and say it changed code when it didn't, or get stuck changing something back and forth repeatedly inside of 10-20 minutes. Like just a handful of exchanges and it's worthless. Are people who make this workflow effective summarizing and creating a fresh prompt every 5 minutes or something?
>51 people who are weakly in favour of something can steamroll 49 who are vehemently against.

so you're saying Karen should get more votes?
Corporations turn evil when their founders lose power or leave. Google used to be a genuinely wonderful force for good. But finance people can borrow money at extremely cheap interest rates from government cronies due to the US fractional reserve system. Then the MBAs offer so much money founders basically can't refuse. Then the companies end up publicly traded and only work on pushing up their next quarters earnings, this becoming evil.
- It is nice to see more backends utilizing SQLite.

Hey thanks for chiming it. Huge fan of PocketBase, has been a major inspiration :applause:. For anyone driving by, certainly a more mature product.

- Based on your benchmarks repo it looks like that the tests were done against PocketBase < v0.23 but note that PocketBase v0.23+ (especially with the Create API rule dry submit removal in v0.24+) has introduced significant changes and performance improvements - ~4x times in high concurrent scenarios in our own benchmarks[0] (if you want to retest it note that the CGO driver is no longer loaded by default and will have to be registered manually; see the example "db_cgo.go" in the PocketBase benchmarks repo or in the "Custom SQLite driver" docs[1]).

You're right. I did run v0.22.21, which simply was current when I ran the benchmarks first. I absolutely will add the information, rerun, and thanks for the pointers. Glad to hear you got such a boost :clap:
Please just keep a list of supported languages on the site. The FAQ only gives a few and the bubble on your site that says more than 29 languages was not clickable on my iPhone - I won’t go any further until I can see supported languages - bonus points if you listed languages that are coming - in order of future of availability
Usually you actually need to not use third party apps. RCS on Android is usually restricted to Google Messages (or maybe Samsungs built in messages app). Everyone else got the boot

You also sometimes have to enable in the settings for Android Messages (and have a supported carrier). iMessage also has an option to enable RCS but I believe its on by default in the newer versions of iOS
We can purchase our food from overseas in peace time. Once the trade routes are disrupted or political embargos hit, suddenly you have 300 million mouths to feed and we can't get critical staples to feed them.

Having local production is a national security defensive measure. It makes sense not to JIT our food supplies.
My take is that nobody actually practices law in this area at this time. Tons of stuff will again need to go to court before you can be sure if these regulations actually apply to you. Actually tons of the cases that are relevant for smaller enterprises will actually never go to court like with GDPR leaving uncertainty for years. Having said this the good thing about the AI act is that it force injects some principles for evaluation into existing standards.

Disclaimer: i am advising a company that sells AI act related compliance tooling
Anytime you read "as an X", spidey senses should tingle and be careful. Caveat lector
Thanks for the pointer, https://github.com/TheBlewish/Automated-AI-Web-Researcher-Ol...
My first though was „oddly specific“ but most people here seem to think this makes sense.

Is my social life dead or what are you guys inviting so many people to?

If I want to organize an event, I just write a message in the relevant group chat and get responses about who’s going to come.
You must not have read the article. They spend so little in taxes for any given individual it becomes a rounding error.
OxyContin was de-facto legalized. You could go to certain doctors, complain of pain, and walk out with a prescription. Just like you could do with medical marijuana in California. Legalization made the problem much worse because it increased demand markedly.
> if you swipe on a few hundred average looking people and get zero matches back. That's ugly.

What's ugly is using an anemometer to measure a distance. I mean, using number of matches in a dating app, to measure uglyness. Dating apps are products designed by psychologist and built by engineers to generate frustration and make people pay, not to serve as a measurement stick of the average person's attractiveness.

Dating apps are utterly broken. Don't do that to yourself, or to anyone.

Meeting women in the Real World through common acquaintances. That's where the moat is.
It seems the lifestyle they enjoy makes it worth barely scraping as owners of very desirable land. Otherwise it would be worth starting over somewhere else where there are jobs that need to be filled. A lot of people woking jobs in cities and towns are barely scraping by too.

I wish we had a healthy safety net in the US but people in need live different lifestyles beyond ranching.
And the Alibaba importer is going to care a lot more about satisfying a potentially repeat $100k importer over a one time $5k buyer, and when you purchase large orders like this you can set quality standards for your products and the seller is on the hook if the products do not match the listed requirements.

Basically, you're paying more but they're taking all of the hassle and worry and a large part of the risk out of the operation for their cut and you're not paying much more than you otherwise would for the service.
Try watching them without audio.

They are all yelling. Even the girl with the cat. Too much energy. Too much expression. Too much pause. The pacing is all the same.
You’re not trying to convince me here, you’re trying to convince the state. I agree!

People should rebuild where they want as much as they want, so long as they’re willing to accept the financial risk to do so (I.E. higher premiums that reflect the risk… which may be 10x higher, who knows! A lot of these Palisades home owners could, and would, pay for that risk, if only the law would let an insurer charge them for that)

State law does not let that happen, and all the risk is therefore subsidized by everyone else or not offered at all. Both worse outcomes!
How ignoring the law not fascism? Mandates do not supercede law, nor allow the executive branch to operate outside branches of government that are not under it's control, and yet Congress does nothing, that's is actually how fascism really does start, when what "dear leader" says is acted upon even though it is clearly illegal
You do understand that PTX is part of CUDA right?
Alright, I’ll bite. Any congress critter went onto the floor and started reading “transparency” files? Or is it the usual partisans with Xitter files?
Jesus, why? This is a bummer.
No it predates Oracle, including when it was still called Software Development Laboratories.