skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are cursor movement tools that use the keyboard--most obviously, the arrow keys. And at least in Windows, entire windows can be moved around or re-sized with the cursor. But it's also the case that there are keyboard remapping tools that allow you to re-map control keys (or other keys) to be cursor control keys as well; I've used a program like this written in C since the early days of Windows 3.1. (I had to make changes to it over time, but I'm using it as I type this in Windows 11.) I'm pretty sure there are similar keyboard remapping tools in Linux, and probably on Macs.

Also: there are re-mapping tools, and there are re-mapping tools. The simple ones allow a one-to-one mapping, e.g. Ctrl-M becomes PageDown. The simplest ones do not allow you to map e.g. Ctrl-D to seven Down arrows, nor do they allow moded mapping--e.g. having Ctrl-Q toggle between selecting and non-selecting cursor movement.
something... related?

https://youtu.be/QHnJ9NmK3Pc

(the mainframe song, uncertain of its background)
https://archive.ph/JCSH0
More applicable might be training, courses, certification etc (where you can clearly demonstrate a business purpose related to your current line of work).
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.20.576352v1
> has built-in protections against false teaching within their own theology

You are just saying the Bible has a bunch of text that lays out what being Christian is and isn't?
Aside from literally collapsing it has in all other definitions.
> These acquisitions are akin to Pablo Escobar buying the Betty Ford Center.

This line cracked me up 8-)

Of course, many acquisitions conform to this analogy.
The bias on HN goes the other way, it’s quite liberal, much like Reddit
This is a wonderful submission to Anna's archive [1]. I really love people pushing the boundaries of shadow source initiatives that benefit all of us, especially providing great code and design. Can't emphasize enough the net plus of open source, BitTorrent, and shadow libraries that have had in the world. You can also make the case that LLMs wouldn't have been possible without shadow libraries; it's just no way of getting enough data to learn.

Just thank you.

https://software.annas-archive.li/AnnaArchivist/annas-archiv...
The bill only restricts AI technology transfers to China, not the publication of public AI research.
What language are you using to develop native apps for macOS and iOS and visionOS and watchOS, since Swift is dying?
Where is the Woodrow bridge? Are all pilots expected to know this flying around the Reagan airport? There are multiple bridges on the Potomac.
This and the everything is public in a struct is wild. The “document it” or use _ to mean “don't touch this” for a user is crazy IMO.
this might interest you: https://github.com/JetBrains/amper
I'd argue that quality actually makes it an amazing show to binge. It wouldn't "work" in the current climate of one-episode-per-week with bountiful time to analyze and Internet sleuths/theorists often coming up with better plots than the actual writing in each next episode, but Lost promises high quality episode after high quality episode for you to, well, just get lost in.

For anyone who hasn't seen it: you're in for a wild ride. Don't look up spoilers.
A better depth of the financial mechanics is to be found on bloomberg [1]. The guardian is short on detail in this instance.

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-01-31/jpmorgan-...

https://archive.is/kRWYM
agree totally. Shane…OMG, Kenny….
It's not limited if he hijacks the entire government from the inside and installs loyalists everywhere
Interest and action are separate. There was interest, so action was taken. Was the mechanism controversial? The mechanism, a law passed by the legislative body and upheld by the court seems like any other law. That's the qualifier in the US Constitution to know if it is constitutional or not.

Don't whack me, it won't change my beliefs.
Link to the content is in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42904980
I'm too bad at remembering shortcuts, so the mouse emulating feature using the arrow keys saved my wrists when I had a problem.
[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42834043
Core libs and foundation for starters?

https://www.swift.org/blog/future-of-foundation/
Disagree. Numbers don't exist in a vacuum - they are collected, framed, and interpreted by humans with biases, agendas, and limitations. Verification isn't just about checking numbers; it's about scrutinizing methodologies, sources, and context. Data can affirm falsehoods when selectively presented or measured poorly. Brains aren't secondary to fact-checking; they are the ultimate tool for discerning whether data reflects reality or is merely a well-dressed distortion.
It's easier to beg forgiveness than to ask permission, and it's easier still to do neither.
No? I see under 10% of the HN front page stories being related to U.S. national politics at the moment, which feels very low compared to Reddit and Facebook for me (which are well over 50%, but I realize that each person sees something different potentially).
> Social media was weaponized and turned into a tool that manipulates people's view of the reality

I really dislike this argument. It shifts responsibility from the voters to evil nebulous puppet-masters. I reject that. At some point, you have to accept that people can think and make decisions for themselves.
> Who cares about the NFL?

It's a simple example, that's why it's relevant. All the facts are available for anyone to see, to process, to analyze. There is no disputed or hidden data. And yet nobody, including any AI, can produce a "true" answer to the question, because it's reliant on one's personal biases.

Even with Covid, did a 92-year old die because of Covid, or because of a multitude of existing conditions that Covid triggered? Probably impossible to know medically, and AI isn't going to tell you definitively one way or the other.
Exactly. I think the answer is always "it depends" and usually boils down to a judge's opinion on just how obvious of a copy it is.
It’s called DeepSeek. The founder just confirmed a few days ago that he got the data from Anna's to train on, I think for their latest vision model.
I mean technically in Australia these days the nbn box is the "modem" for all intents and purposes, if you have fttp.

You don't actually need a secondary modem and can plug your pc directly into it, takes a lot of the pain out of it and reduces the need for ISP supplied modems.
> All his talk about getting to Mars to "maintain the light of consciousness" (...) is actually BS

While I hate Elon's politics, I love space exploration, and I believe his motivation with SpaceX is sincere. From the start he made SpaceX with the goal of getting to Mars, and after all these years SpaceX is actually getting near the capability of sending tens of tonnes of cargo to Mars. He's been talking about getting to Mars for more than 20 years, he became a member of the Mars Society in 2001 and wanted to fund a small (unmanned) Mars mission[0], when he wasn't yet a billionaire, but very rich from PayPal, and before SpaceX was founded. Then he invested a big part of his fortune in SpaceX, which was a very risky bet. Even in the early days of SpaceX he planned to make a big rocket capable of getting a big payload to Mars[1] (the "BFR" that the 2005 article is talking about is today's Starship). I wish he had stayed focused on Mars, instead of making Earth's dirty politics even dirtier.

[0] https://spaceref.com/status-report/marsnow-19-profile-elon-m...

[1] https://www.thespacereview.com/article/497/1
Or maybe that’s what people who defraud billions per year want you to think…
It would be unfair to retroactively remove someone's citizenship for illegally overstaying their own visa... But if you're punishing the child for their parents doing it, then it's just common-sense justice! /S

I'm really tired of all this Calvinball.
Thank for you for a thoughtful answer.

In a nutshell, you're advocating for a term-limit on roles like this, which is an entirely valid argument.
In refining A39672:14BF61 (Dranesville) in 00h 05m 34s 215ms I have brought glory to the company.
Praise Kier.
4⃣7⃣8⃣0⃣1⃣
3⃣7⃣4⃣1⃣1⃣
4⃣3⃣3⃣1⃣2⃣
9⃣6⃣7⃣5⃣2⃣
1⃣7⃣9⃣4⃣1⃣
#mdrlumon #severance
lumon-industries.com
Sabotage? He could do it blatantly publicly without repercussions, it seems. I wish what you said was true but my reading of the SCOTUS ruling is basically that impeachment is the only option, and the party in power is not going to convict its own president (especially for something a few would support).
Obelisks eh? I wish this article had more on the dimensions of these little critters. Was hoping to read that they’re of 1:4:9 proportions, and thus the given name was a sort of hat tip…

Cue Zarathustra
Oumi: Everything you need to build foundation models
That’s pretty normal for fiber. They usually want their own device at the end of it
Canadian here. I don't understand the end goal of the tarif game. Negotiating technique?

Long term isn't it pure lose lose?
HN is whatever your echochamber is. right-leaning people are bitching that it is too “liberal,” left-leaning people are bitching that is too “conservative”

the main issue I see is that these-days-right-leaning-people do not like flagging, aka community-policing of content… same thing they don’t like on reddit or anywhere else :)
> But you choose to be a Christian.

I think it is more complex than that. Some people, they've been raised in a religion, it's been part of their life since they've been a small child. They never sought it out and actively chose it for themselves, they inherited it from their parents and their ancestors. It can be a very deep part of their identity.

Also, try replacing the word "Christian" there with "Muslim" or "Jew", and see how it sounds.

> No-one choses to be trans.

I think transgender feelings exist on a spectrum. Some people don't have any. Some people have a tiny inkling of it that they know is never going to go anywhere. Other people, they are very strong, and they are convinced they'll never be happy unless they live life true to them. But, there are people in the middle, for whom it is more of a choice whether to cultivate these feelings or suppress them – and they might be able to find happiness going down either path. For them, being "trans" is a choice – it wasn't a choice to have those feelings to begin with, but they have a real choice about what to do with them – and if they choose to suppress them, and manage to find happiness in doing so – aren't they in a sense choosing not to be trans? But conversely, if they make the opposite choice – are they not choosing to be trans? From which I think it follows, some people really do choose to be or not to be trans – which isn't to say there aren't other people for whom there isn't anywhere near as much choice involved in it.

I have no idea how big a group of people this "people in the middle" is, but I suspect it may be bigger than you think. It isn't the kind of thing one goes around telling everyone about.
Basically, if companies who created language dump it on Github and let open source community take over it is nonviable. Because who will pay for project development that these mega corps dumped on community and washed their hands off.

On the other hand if companies take ownership, provide financing, design, vision, evolution of language, compiler, libraries and ecosystem etc it is nonviable because it is dictatorship now.

Solution is to let drive by commentators to have full commit rights on open source repositories if they want to change any part of language. Anything less unacceptable.
Wasn't Isolationism the practice that was strongly, negatively spoken about when people were going through middle and high school as "the way to fall behind"? and "what all those people that didn't advance did for centuries and it harmed them"?
I don’t disagree. I was explaining why one might want to. The “electricity” in the air when you are working and surrounded by brilliant people who really are passionate about what they’re doing is addictive and extremely fulfilling.

That is often how you get brilliant people to work on things that are otherwise potentially bad for humanity. You appeal not to their humanity, but to their excitement and passion for building.
But that’s not what they were doing. They gerrymandered a biographical test to achieve a particular racial balance.

What you’re describing is the motte of DEI. And that’s great. But it often turns into the bailey of “racial preferences or quotas.” Which is illegal.
I'm not sure he really cares if these actions get overturned. At least some of them will be sustained, even if only because somebody's lawyers faffs oral arguments. And I suspect that he'll just ignore the court in some cases. How many legions hath the Supreme Court?
Still looking for hen's teeth, but they seem to be as scarce as chicken breasts. (The only breasts found so far are on mammals.)
Your wishlist seems midly contradictory. Why does Apple need to open-source XCode if they also provide support for 3rd party IDEs (which they already do, btw)? Also what do you not like about cocoapods for package management?

Plenty of people make an incredible amount of money building apps in Swift, so your last sentence is just wrong.
Counterpart may be the best show of that sort I’ve ever seen.
Countries like Hungary.

Not a place I think anyone should try and emulate.
Does it actually make it a crime to download DeepSeek?

Does downloading and using a model qualify as r&d on behalf of it's creator?

Because that's what this bill seems to be banning.
You are proving my point. The CDC has faced several instances where its data was inaccurate or misrepresented:

- COVID-19 Death Overcount: In 2022, a coding error led the CDC to overcount 72,277 COVID-19 deaths across 26 states. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/24/cdc-coding-err...

- Maternal Mortality Data: Changes in death certificate reporting, particularly the addition of a pregnancy checkbox, resulted in overcounts of maternal deaths due to false positives. Source: https://www.theatlantic.com/podcasts/archive/2024/08/materna...

- Lead Exposure Report: A 2004 CDC report underestimated the impact of lead-contaminated water in Washington, D.C., leading to criticism over its data accuracy. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morbidity_and_Mortality_Weekly...

- Property System Data: An audit revealed that the CDC's property system data was neither accurate nor complete, with an estimated $29.2 million of property at risk of being lost or misplaced. Source: https://oig.hhs.gov/reports/all/2016/centers-for-disease-con...

These instances highlight that data, even from reputable sources, can be subject to errors, misinterpretation, or manipulation, underscoring the need for critical analysis beyond face-value acceptance.
if you want static ip addresses, you need comcast business and must use their router. blast.
Can you email me at the email in my profile? I'd like to talk with you.
I have ... concerns about how this information was found. Does anyone know the path to walk on the individual's website that gets you to the Word Press page?
If you look at most great evil perpetrated by mankind, it's almost always someone trying to "do good". Sure there are serial killers or whatever, crimes of passion, but they just kill one or a few. The people who have killed millions, driven whole regions into famine and death, destroyed lives at an industrial scale.... they were 'doing good'.

Utilitarian consequentialism is the most evil of all philosophies. If someone is merely sadistic their sadism will be sated after some finite amount of abuse. If someone is greedy then their harm will at least be limited to what they can profit from and there is no profit in ruling over a cinder. But the harm possible by someone convinced that their actions are good in some abstract sense is without any bound.

The irony in the lesswrongers fixation on consequentialist morality is that their great fear of machine superintendence is derived from an expectation that its evil will arise from the same sorts of reasoning they engage in themselves. They simply fail to pause and ask "Are we the baddies?"

I usually leave it out of my complaints because they're so ineffectual that it's not a real threat. But the LW solution to "unaligned" machine intelligence is to create an AI god in their own image first, so that it can enslave humanity and all other lifeforms within its lightcone for their own best interest, and suppresses the creation of any competing "unaligned" God. So they're literally out to create the very thing they fear, but with the hubris to imagine that if it was theirs it would be "good". The ultimate fantasy of both the utilitarian consequentialist and most authoritarian mass murderers. If their doomsday fears come true my bet is that it will be at their own hand or that of their followers.

It's also the ultimate horseshoe for militant internet atheists-- "there is no God; and this is OK" becomes "there is no God; and we're gonna create one in our own image".
If you used DNA across all birds, maybe it would be possible to identify the different bits of dinosaur DNA they inherited. Since they branched from each other at different points in time. And presumably wouldn’t have all lost the same genes.
Yeah. It's been going on since the dotcom boom. I watched Slashdot become increasingly right wing for a decade. When I finally gave up on it, it was practically Stormfront.
Historically it comes from global gold mines -> various bullion collectors.

Right now the Kalgoorlie Superpit (really big hole) is wound down, however it had three decades of producing ~ 1 Billion (AUD) of gold per annum.

Other lesser gold mines have also produced in history and others still produce today.

Most gold "does nothing" .. it's shiny, it's collectable, people pile it up.

It's really good for long lasting expensive space tech, it's great for decorating statues, it looks good as jewellry .. but it's essentially just 'precious'.
Lol, as long as it’s the preferred programming language for the most lucrative consumer devices ever, it cannot die.

Impossible to argue otherwise.
I mean obviously this is actually how LLMs work.

(Season One predates the LLM bubble, so almost certainly not.)
Always did.

Somehow this area looks ripe for some automation - extremely difficult for human brain, tons of rules. Being risky makes even more sense to automate.
I don't understand how Andreessen, Thiel, and the rest of the the "alt right tech" prefer this and "anti woke" to some non-consequential DEI lip service and a functioning government.

Oh well, as long as he's "one of us" right? Who cares about national security, privacy, etc... Trump will pardon him and DOGE will have much win much budget cuts amirite?
Title is a little misleading, these aren't staff of the new made up DOGE agency but an existing agency (the US Digital Service) that predates the Trump administration and is now (apparently?) under the control of Elon Musk
Surface Book 2 here, same price as a top spec MacBook Pro, absolute garbage. Thermally throttled, poor performance, random freeze ups, terrible screen glare, screen wobbled constantly, never again.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSNGdNl...

But also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supergod
Let's first work on eliminating political parties altogether, then let's work on eliminating bias.
The idea is to end up with one fewer!
I think season 2 will end up doing a lot tbh. It got great reviews from critics and they allowed critics to watch the full season before reviewing, which isn't as common. Usually it's only one or two episodes. It makes me feel like they had a big story that they wanted to be witnessed in its entirety for the critics.
The new administration seems hell-bent on repeating history, especially 30s Germany.

Isolationism is the natural outcome of blaming "the other."
Please let’s not go back to the 2016-2020 impeachment and removal fantasies. The man was impeached twice, once even after his presidency was over and still the American people put him back into office.

Also, of note, every time he has run for president he received more votes than prior runs—even in 2020. There is literally only one person who has ever received more votes than Trump and that’s Biden in 2020 and frankly there will forever be an asterisk after that election due to the pandemic and Trump’s subsequent win in 2024.

If you want him out of office before his term ends, you will need to have 67 democrats as senators with probably at least a quarter of those senators being willing to lose their own elections for that vote. Bottom line, he is in for the next four.
Have you seen Patriot?
If someone shoplifts in front of me, I can't say that person "broke the law"?

The law is crystal clear, and he didn't follow it intentionally.
X sues Lego, Nestlé and more brands, accusing them of advertising boycott
There's also the Intel iAPX 432 "micro-mainframe" processor (1981) on two chips. (This was supposed to be Intel's flagship processor, but it was a disaster and the 8086 took over instead. The NYT called it "one of the great disaster stories of modern computing".) I think that microprocessor manufacturers had mainframe envy in the 1980s.
To be clear, trump signed an EO renaming Digital Service to DOGE: https://www.npr.org/2025/01/29/nx-s1-5270893/doge-united-sta...
So RLHF is the secret sauce behind modern LLMs?
Trump renamed it to reuse the letters.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/esta...
From is quite fun too. It is extremely similar to lost in its vibes and writing style. For the record I think both of these shows are not good shows, but are definitely entertaining shows.
Qutebrowser is not perfect but the concept and keyboard control is spot on.

Specifically ad blocking is not as comprehensive as eg brave or ublock since they don’t have element hiding - just domain blocking. There was some discussion on GitHub to add it but I’m not sure of current status. This means that you’ll see Reddit and YouTube ads unfortunately (without some scripting effort;)
So many facets to this, and I’ll bet that many of us have seen great ideas fall off the table and cried.

Undoubtedly, no single theory is going to cover all cases, like physicists seeking the one theory of everything, but they are probing nature, whereas innovators are facing many moving targets, acting chaotically.

Steve Jobs had his failures, and Microsoft had countless failures. In Jobs’ case, he rebounded. Microsoft was big enough to absorb the failures. (Yes, this is all simplified). And sometimes, you are just ahead of the times, and an idea (the iPad) succeeds when the time is right.

Engineers learn (or not) that there’s a difference between efficiency (great ideas and processes) and effectiveness (selling the idea internally and getting the organization behind it.) Long story short, sometimes you’ve got to work in stealth mode, like the first Mac, spin off a group to properly implement the innovation, or be mighty flexible. The thing that floored me was that Apple could go from a computer company to a music player company and then to a phone company, but it did.

And sports teams often won’t retool until they hit bottom, like the aforementioned German army. Inventors can overreact when their ideas are not adopted, like J.C. Fuller, who flipped from fighting nazis to shaking hands with their leader. Inventors and entrepreneurs aren’t gods. Success has many factors.

Not all ideas that remain on the table are great.

But the board liked them. :-(

Just some observations based on the article, not a theory of everything.

“Things Change”
None of those mention "installing drives".
Sorry this is happening to you.

What really shatters my faith in common sense is the fact that trans is a minority of a minority and is made out to be a problem when it's not.

Just remember that you have allies in this industry. Lots of love.