skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is not correct. The executive branch is required to disburse the money allocated by Congress. See the Impoundment Control Act of 1974.
And the merch store is funding multiple developers? Zero chance they’re currently making a profit from that.
It's run by a white supremacist who throws Sieg Heil salutes. It's extremely right wing.
This is the correct answer. Only do dating apps as a way to do A/B testing. ;)
So does this mean they are going to patch out the ability for Rufus to modify and burn images using the bog standard W11 ISO that do not require TPM checks or M$ accounts?
There are some technical issues in moving beyond that. For example I was talking to a pilot in Africa and apparently for long haul between Europe and South Africa the local controller in the various countries en route were considered a bit useless go they had a particular frequency where they would occasionally say this if flight x over country y heading so and so direction and altitude and other planes on that frequency could here where they were - the radio range is ~200 miles. I'm not sure how you'd replace that other than with something like starlink which is quite recent.
Would the outcome depend on they’re Uyghur or Han ethnicity?
CFP talk proposal ideas for POSETTE: An Event for Postgres 2025
> I’m cheering on the DOGE strike teams.

I'd cheer if the DOGE strike teams in OMB, etc., were to be arrested, indicted, duly tried and convicted, and imprisoned for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and possibly the Economic Espionage Act. But I'm under no illusion that this would ever happen with Trump controlling the DOJ. Maybe Maryland's Democratic state government can make some state-law crime stick if the DOGE people ever venture across the District line.
I'm not going to pretend to know the details about THIS shooting, but so many of these events involve mental illness. I have to wonder if the modern internet era + mental illness has unlocked a sort of spiral that for these folks takes them places they otherwise would not go.

That's all theory, I don't know if it's backed by fact, but it's sad, worrisome.
I have a hard time seeing how an invites app is going to be limited technologically. It's not complicated.

Video calling is orders of magnitude more complicated.

They're not really comparable.
I agree. I just think we need to focus more on congress' role in this. The checks and balances only work if we force congress to act as a check and as long as congress keeps voting along party lines and doing the president's bidding, not much is going to change. It shouldn't be normal for the senate to confirm radically unqualified people to positions of power just because the president nominates them.
I mean, you can invite anyone. it’s not limited to apple device invitees.
> A developed country is not a place where the poor have cars. It's where the rich use public transportation.

-- Gustavo Petro
> they are fundamentally unconcerned with goodness or morality, and any appearance that they are is purely a marketing exercise

This is flatly untrue. Corporations are made up of humans who make decisions. They are indeed concerned with goodness and/or morality. Saying otherwise lets them off the hook for the explicit decisions they make every day about how to operate their company. It's one reason why there are shareholder meetings, proxy votes, activist investors, Certified B-Corporations, etc.
Completely agree with you.

Neither is better than the other yet it's becoming more and more difficult to find people that understand the flaws of both.

I don't understand tho how something like apple can do so well in the USA, land of freedom and individual rights, when they are basically locking people into their system and telling them what they can and what they can't do.

Not being able to install whatever app you want on your phone should be a big red flag for freedom advocate. That's literally the reason why hongkong citizens massively ditched apple a few years ago when there was protestation and apple, following CCP order, banned the apps they used to organize themselves.

Yet it seems like a non issue in usa ??
> Some people certainly have been pied in the face, so how could you deny that "pie attack culture" exists?

By not being obtuse enough to conflate "this has happened at least once" with "this appears to be widely considered culturally acceptable".
I witnessed the described Salesforce scenario first hand. The amount of waste and dissonance was staggering.
Musk is a Nazi. I've read history books. I'll take the status quo over Musk every time.
I don't think AI is an exception. In organizations where there were top-down mandates for Agile, or OOP, or Test-Driven Development, or you-name-it, those who didn't take up the mandate with zeal were likely to find themselves out of favor.
Nine – seemingly impossible C64 demo
Fun idea, but TikTok works because you don't need to leave the feed. Try to find a way to provide the wiki's content in the feed itself.
This simply doesn't work much of the time as an excuse - virtually all the AI tool subscriptions for corporations provide per user stats on how much each staff member is using the AI assist. This shouldn't come as a surprise - software tool purveyors need to demonstrate ROI to their customer's management teams and as always this is in reporting tools.

I've already seen several rounds of slacks: "why aren't you using <insert LLM coding assistant name>?" off the back of this reporting.

These assistants essentially spy on you working in many cases, if the subscription is coming from your employer and is not a personal account. For one service, I was able to see full logging of all the chats every employee ever had.
It is contrary to the foundational document of our country. The president does not have that authority because he is a president, not a king.
As a big fan of Apple TV boxes and a medium fan of Apple TV+, I can't agree with this strongly enough. It's such an unforced error.

It's so unnecessary to call everything "Apple something" when they've had great success creating recognizable brand names like "iPod", "iPhone", and "Macintosh".

Calling it "Apple TV+" just feels like both the set-top box and the streaming service wanted the name "Apple TV" and neither side was budging.
Geico Developing TuxTape – A New Linux Kernel Livepatching Solution
> Do you know why people go through the pain of becoming a doctor? Because they make a lot of money when they get through the other side.

I think the guaranteed respect and admiration that comes from the title is actually a more powerful draw. Don't get me wrong, the money is good, but on par with senior manager in any large tech firm. Doctor is a primal respect that technical roles do not carry.

You're not getting instant respect from mother in laws and pastors as an ATC.
I'm an Apple guy and I have to disagree, it's not the Telco's.

Android implemented RCS and Apple dragged their feet in implementing the standardised platform such that high quality messaging was seamless and agnostic between brands

The iPhone needed to reduce the quality of pics/videos to non-iMessage recipients because Apple didn't support any other form of non-iMessage messaging.
It makes sense—we all know how capitalism works. But the thing is, how can you not apply the law of diminishing returns here? The models are getting marginally better with a significant increase in investment, except for DeepSeek’s latest developments, which are impressive but mostly for cost reasons—not because we’ve achieved anything remotely close to AGI.

If your experienced employees, who are giving an honest try to all these tools, are telling you it’s not a silver bullet, maybe you should hold your horses a little and try to take advantage of reality—which is actually better—rather than forcing some pipe dream down your bottom line’s throat while negating any productivity gains by demotivating them with your bullshit or misdirecting their efforts into finding a problem for a given solution.
The web.archive.org version only has 14 items. Is the "Infinitely Scroll Mathematics" more infinite? I am going to keep an eye on this it looks like something I would like to see (regardless of the infinitely part0.
It is gone: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/jEBnrzNuUSA
I am actively balking at this. The Democrats did this to the country by having zero likable or relatable candidates and alienating the actual left of this country. Tim Walz was likable and relatable to middle America but he wasn’t running for president.

The DNC has acted so undemocratic it is flabbergasting.

We need a different party comprised of working class Americans who want to take care of the working class and not corporate interests. Reject culture war nonsense and frame this for what it is, a class war. If the response to Luigi wasn’t telling enough, I don’t know. The sentiment is there. Just need to fan the flames.
We built out a few mechanisms to make sure Lynx only automatically perform safe actions, and you have complete control over it’s access and behavior:

1. Users can set whether Lynx commands run automatically or manually. In manual mode, users can approve, edit, or reject commands before they execute.

2. When manual mode is off, the model was trained to only automatically execute read-only commands. Although it’s theoretically possible to still execute unsafe commands, we audit this internally and have a 0% error rate.

3. Our system supports fine-grained RBAC for various integrations (such as DataDog, Kubernetes, cloud providers), allowing you to grant specific permissions for investigation tasks while restricting sensitive operations.
Also discussed here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42938125
These are not exactly equal. I'm not saying that I am particularly triggered by such titles (even when they apply to my family history, genealogy, etc) but there are some people who are and accomodating them is not a huge impact.

Changing the names back because you were upset that somone changed them in the first place, with the express knowledge that some people may be affected by this, is a dick move.

One of these moves is a virtue signal, yes, but it has no real impact once completed. This current move from 'main' to 'master' is designed to both virtue signal and to upset/piss people off/etc.
Creating a new prompt. Sometimes it can go for a while without, but the first response (with crafted context) is generally the best. Having context from the earlier conversation has its uses though.
The cynic in me thinks that the US is going to roll over and take this fascist shake down. The optimist in me thinks that the people will rise up with a resounding NO and do something about it. Right now I'm not sure which I believe.
> More likely is that Trump destablised the west and caused a net increase in illegal migration attempts.

nope, border encounters have dropped significantly after Trump took office.

To your last points, I won't address because you throw up unsubstantiated accusations that has become the Leftist party line. There's no discussion to be had here.
Is this a US ONLY problem? I'm not trying to start a flame war, I'm genuinely wondering for example: European air travel doesn't seem any less safe than the US so whatever they are doing seems to work just as well. Do they have trouble hiring and keeping ATCs? Is their comp/work life/training/etc very different than ours? Would appreciate any insight from folks that know.
Let’s say that you meet a few hundred average women in real life and none express physical attraction to you. I’d say you’re still ugly.

Meeting single women in real life through acquaintances is pretty uncommon. Most of the women I meet through friends aren’t single. For good reason, most men burn their bridges with eligible women and most women have no interest in showing you to their friends.

The only person who ever introduced me to any women was a very kind gay man and it was abnormal even for him. He really reached for me but both women rejected on the spot due to their lack of physical attraction.
It is not the budget that is the issue to them, except maybe in the total size. I'm sure they think it can be done cheaper. Rather it is how the money is spent that they are looking at. That's within the executive branch's authority, not Congress.
"It becomes some sort of muscle memory, where I can predict whether using LLM would be faster or slower"

Yeah, that intuition is so important. You have to use the models a whole bunch to develop it, but eventually you get a sort of sixth sense where you can predict if an LLM is going to be useful or harmful on a problem and be right about it 9/10 times.

My frustration is that intuition isn't something I can teach! I'd love to be able to explain why I can tell that problem X is a good fit and problem Y isn't, but often the answer is pretty much just "vibes" based on past experience.
So you prefer corporate speak suits who don't make the mistake of embarrassing themselves in public? Because they don't ever speak in public? Are you honestly telling me you prefer un-named lobbyists having influence, because that has been the status quo. At least we can point the finger at Musk. And yes, I would posit doing and saying stupid shit in public IS more human than what we normally get. Its a pretty normal human behavior to make mistakes, embarrass yourself, lash out, etc. It's certainly more human like behavior than elected politicians engage in where they disclose absolutely nothing and hide behind PR speak approved by a team of 20.

I don't really know what your quote is about, seems like grinding a specific gear which I'm not particularly interesting in looking into.

But to your final point. The jury is still out on whether Musk acts _exclusively_ for his own gains. Sure he has an ego, but he was also instrumental in bringing EVs to the market (which many of his now opponents were quick to adopt), and at the very least has rekindled an interest in space exploration and so on.

I have many misgivings about the man, but at least we can see him. Which is better than the previous status-quo.
The real surprise is that the quoted budget was only $1.2m. Fixing potholes in my neighborhood is quoted more than that.
I'm happy to report that v0.25.0 already w/o CGO driver (fighting it right now) and GOOS=linux CGO_ENABLED=0 GOAMD64=v4 improved about 35% from 61.7s per 100k inserts to about 40s :clap:

I still wanna get the mattn/go-sqlite3 driver to work and it's getting a bit late here for writing coherent text... I'll update the benchmarks ASAP
Hilarious how few folks reference this. I’ve found it to be pretty good!
I’m not interested in charity or exploitation.
Pretty high I suspect, since you need it if you want to back up more that 5 GB.

If you keep photos and videos without dealing with a separate service, it's pretty much a no-brainer. And the cheapest tier is $0.99/mo. for 50 GB so it's not exactly breaking the bank.
I think with LLMs we will actually see the demand for software developers who can understand code and know how to use the tools sky rocket. There will be ultimately be way more money in total going towards software developers, but average pay will be well above the median pay.
>fent sales would plummet

None of what you've described is how any of this works in the real world.

There's an entire world of behaviour from a seller's perspective for every drug and an entire set of behaviour from a user's perspective. They match closely to how 'legal' alcohol production and consumption works. Biggest profits are from the biggest addicts of alcohol and their suppliers are all on the stock exchange for everyone to see. Beer almost never kills anyone, same with the production from large reputable companies. but if you find a great deal of homemade hard liqour make sure you test for ethanol and methanol. Thats simply how addicts die no matter the product they are using.

'some white powder' could literally be anything and everything. Idiots could cut it up wrong and what previously got you high just fine might potentially be a lethal dose right in front of you in the form of a powdery white line with no way to tell. Theres the mostly harmless chemicals used to reduce dose to cut the dealer more profit but could still not be mixed properly so new users wouldn't be able to notice. Then theres the nitazenes and other stuff that most tests only detect 'presence of' but not the dose so you would still have to throw everything out even though it might be mixed and dosed properly. And then theres the less addicted group who doesn't even bother with anything ever and only wants the pure stuff in large single batches in order to test fully and properly. Those people never get screwed over because thats what they pay for.
That's where most of it comes from - iCloud+ is different than Apple One.

iCloud+ for 2TB is priced just where if you have ONE other Apple service, you're probably better off with Apple One.

(I admit I misread this whole thing as being a feature of Apple One.)
Manual heap allocation can slow the program down non-trivially compared to using an arena which is cleaned up all at once; hence, manual heap allocation is a kind of GC. Checkmate atheists.
My anecdotal user-end data-science-ish story about dating apps:

A few years back I was single and on Hinge a fair amount. If you used Hinge back then, you'll remember some key differences between the platform and other dating apps: 1) when you "like"'d someone, you'd have to comment on a specific part of their profile (a photo, a prompt answer, etc), 2) these likes showed up in their inbox, independent of whether they liked you or not (as in, you didn't have to like each other mutually; the other end decided whether to reply or ignore after delivery), and 3) there was limit per day, you could like/message 8 profiles per day, no more. On average, swiping through my 8 per day, I'd generally get 1-2 new replies, which turned roughly into 3-4 first dates per month.

One of the key elements is that the inbox was time-ordered: the most recent like you received was at the top. There was discussion on the Hinge subreddit about how girls would typically only click through the top few items in their inbox daily, and if you were lower down, you were doomed to drown under the mountain of new message they're getting on top. So I figured I'd solve for "what is the optimal time of day to be blasting out my likes to ensure I end up higher in the inbox?"

You can probably see where this is going: I requested a GDPR data export, which happened to have all my conversations, time-stamped. Crunching through in Python there was something in the data I didn't really expect.. a disproportionate number of first-replies (replies to my initial like/message, that is) were around the 2-3pm bucket. Not what I would've expected (don't these people work?) but fair enough, I started doing all my swiping in those hours instead of in the evening as I usually did.

And it worked. Good god did it work. I consistently started getting replies to 70-80% of my initial messages (from the ~10% before). I was drowning in conversations to the point where I wouldn't swipe at all for days for fear of yet another conversation to manage. Within a few months I ended up meeting my current girlfriend and haven't been back on since, but it was surprising how well something simple like time-of-day affected my reply rate.
The UK's National Museum of Computing in Bletchley Park did a rebuild.[1]
But not much detail is given in the video. Anybody know of a schematic?
Turing's paper was quoted in Cryptologia, but that is paywalled now.

The 7-tube "combiner" is clearly analog. The key generator seems to be three multivibrators phase-locked with relatively prime ratios. That's cute. It's a pseudo-congruential random number generator in the analog domain.

This exploits the effect that oscillators that are weakly linked will tend to come into sync.
Not necessarily at 1:1; you can sync at various ratios, with difficulty. Must have been a pain to get to work reliably. I'd like to see the schematics.

With phase-locked loops and counters this would be easy; that's how modern radio tuners work. Not easy to make reliable with 1940s technology. Getting things to sync up was a huge headache until the 1970s.

[1] https://www.hmgcc.gov.uk/news/turing-s-rebuilt-delilah-machi...
Good, this idea that all weapons are evil is an insane luxury belief.
I'm from Indonesia and my access has been blocked too.
Part of "being nice" is accepting that people aren't perfect and just dealing with that, within limits of reason of course. "Assume good faith" and all of that. The phrasing of "cancer" wasn't brilliant, but also really not that bad – certainly not bad enough to warrant removal from the Linux project. That's pretty draconian.

Code of Conduct is not about demanding absolute perfection and then selectively using it as a cudgel to beat people you disagree with. Doubly so since Hector's behaviour over the years has frequently been less than stellar, including in that very thread where he calls Hellwig's comments "distractions orchestrated by a subset of saboteur maintainers who are trying to demoralize you until you give up".[1] Yikes!

Using "cancer" to describe "it will spread everywhere and it will become unmaintainable" is not great, but at the core still a technical disagreement. Outright dismissing people's technical opinions and ascribing malicious motivations as part of a cabal is a mean-spirited and nasty personal attack, and essentially just an insult.

And it's really not "sabotage" to disagree or to be against something and being upfront about it. If that's "sabotage" then anyone saying "I don't think we should go ahead with this" is guilty of "sabotage".

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/2b9b75d1-eb8e-494a-b0...
Knowing Oracle, they will take it to court if they can. To paraphrase Cantrill, it's a company that behaves very much like a lawnmower.
Best of luck with your search. I'm not the candidate you are looking for but something about your product description makes that nice 'click' noise in my brain.
RCS is not really an open standard though. If you want encrypted RCS with android phones, you can't unless Google lets you. At least that was true last I checked. I'm guessing it hasn't changed.
People generally do not want to have an insane, frustrated partner.
its not like I'm feeling super free of lock in when I'm using FB invites, partiful, or evite.
As a non-american I also thought the same. Reading a synopsis of evidence completely changed my mind [1]. Pipe bombs planted at party headquarters to divert the police, maps of tunnels under the Capitol building and so on. Not amateur stuff.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planning_of_the_January_6_Unit...
Board games and craft beers are utterly unrelated objects who have commonality on essentially no axes (except sitting on tables, I guess). And, yet, if you like one, there's a very good chance you like the other.

I think that's where the sentiment comes from. It's not that Rust is similar to C++ in terms of the actual languages and their features. It's that people who like C++ are morely likely to like Rust than people who like C are.

I would argue that C is not a minimalistic language either. There is a lot under the hood in C. But it feels small in a way that Rust and C++ don't.

I think Rust and C++ appeal to programmers who are OK with a large investment in wrapping their head around a big complex language with the expectation that they will be able to amortize that investment by being very productive in large projects over a large period of time. Maybe sometimes the language feels like trying to keep a piece of heavy duty machinery from killing you, but they're willing to wrestle with it for the power you get in return.

The people who are excited about Zig and C wants something that feels more like a hand tool that doesn't demand a lot of their attention and lets them focus on writing their code, even if the writing process is a little more manual labor in return.
Why should people get grants because of who they choose to sleep with?