skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What words? That this playbook of making promises to then create another crisis to change the subject is well known? That is true and will remain true. Will you read up on the 20th century so you're on the same page as the comment you're replying to?

But how would the words "it's not about the budget, but ideology" but refuted by budget cuts, anyway? I can give you candy in my van, and the candy can be real, but that still doesn't make it about the candy. And freeing up a significant fraction of the budget is hardly saying anything. You can save money by throwing people on the streets and letting them starve. You can make money by letting drug dealers go free and making them give the government a cut of the profits. Maybe not enough to offset the tax cuts to the super rich, or the costs incurred by just setting everything on fire to consolidate wealth for a few sociopaths, but probably "significant". So? That's supposed to be an argument for waving firing prosecutors for political reasons through?
Doesn't matter. It's not like they can make you pay.

I refused to pay for medical "services" I never asked for. They sent the debt to collections. Collections had no argument other than that they would really like it if I paid. My credit score was unaffected.
Quite interesting! I've written a library that does something similar ("tap") for a Go application: https://github.com/henvic/httpretty
https://asciinema.org/a/297429

I also thought about doing something like this for any program, but never really investigated how to do it. Nice to see someone out there created it :)
> “We should treat Trump and members of his administration like Elon Musk as akin to Russian oligarchs,” Macfarlane wrote. “We need to impose meaningful costs on the U.S. for its economic aggression.”

The most meaningful cost you could impose in this situation is to establish a direction in which innovation within your borders rivals that of your aggressors, so you are not beholden to the government of their day.
SEEKING WORK | Full-stack Django Developer & AI Engineer

Location: Thailand (GMT+7)
Remote: Only
Willing to relocate: No (Within Thailand only)
Technologies: Django, Python, HTMX, AlpineJs, Tailwind, SQL, PostGreSQL
Résumé/CV: https://edwin.genego.io/
Email: edwin@genego.io
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/edwin-genego/

As a Sr. Software Engineer & Web-developer primarily working with Python frameworks. I am comfortable wearing many hats, and have worked through small to large sized projects for different sized clients (small to enterprise), building tech both on the Back & Front-end as well as Infra. I am currently looking for an AI or LLM company to work with. I have worked with clients in AI since 2022 - and am currently spending several hours per day experimenting with AI & LLMs. From getting my hands dirty with the latest models and papers, to working on small applications that use AI. Especially when it comes to agentive apps (read: function calling or code writing-and-executing models), real world simulations (simulating 1000s of interactions with LLMs) or forecasting with LLMs. I have a few exploratory side-projects to show. And a huge amount of passion for the subject matter (productizing AI & LLMS) to bring to the table. AI-Stack keywords: LangChain, LLamaIndex, AutoML, MLFlow, AG2 (formerly Autogen), TinyTroupe, Oasis
I dare you to come up with a single example of someone that has a billion dollars in liquid assets. They probably don't exist: "billionaries" are worth billions on paper, thanks to stocks, investments, real estate holdings, etc.

All in all, billionaires are a bad example of holding legal tender, because that just doesn't happen.
Too late the 0.1% took all the cookies and didn’t learn how to share as children
Well at least there's hardly any out there yet, lol
Over 40 and still thinking about getting into a system programming job. Gonna give myself another 3-5 years and then give up.
I think you meant to link: https://social.treehouse.systems/@marcan/113941358237899362
They're actually paying to give it up then. That's a hard fail.
Tesla and SpaceX ran on government money. X is doing poorly enough that he’s suing former advertisers demanding that the courts force them buy ads.

He now has significant influence over all of those things. Official government communications are only being released on X, incentivizing people to use it. The next NASA contract is going to be awarded by people who know their boss’ boss’ boss’ boss’ boss owes his political career to the owner of one of the bidders. Last quarter, a quarter of Tesla’s net income was unrealized Bitcoin profits – and he’s pushing the government to subsidize Bitcoin so it can get the kind of adoption it hasn’t been able to achieve on merit!

This is why government ethics rules exist, and why high-level officials have public confirmation hearings. Even if he was incredibly scrupulous about not making decisions based on his own interests, it reeks of corruption and provides many avenues for potential abuse (e.g. what if China threatened to seize his factories unless he helped them get a better deal?). The federal employees he’s attacked have annual training reminding them that they can’t accept gifts over $20/year – and really shouldn’t even then – with consequences up to going to jail for a long time.
Am I reading the bill text wrong or is it really so general it would also apply to devices assembled in China that can perform AI operations?

Seems like there'd be pushback from Apple, MS, etc on that one.
You mean one time-barred, victimless misdemeanor that got transmogrified into 34 felonies by an overzealous political hack of a prosecutor?

Lawfare was tried, and it failed. I hope it dies the death it deserves instead of becoming the new normal.
If you are bleeding from the wound on your head it does not mean you need to cut off your legs. This is just weakening of state while covering it under this charade.

Inflation was because of pandemic and wars. Rest is absolute nonsense.
That's what your mute is for. 100% support that.

Bluesky preventing users from replying to your posts on your say-so. Yup, there's a word for that.
Yep. When push comes to shove, I suspect more of them will side with the authoritarian since that's kind of the personality type that tends to get involved in these kinds of occupations.
If all you care about are transaction speeds then use the lightning network. Instant settlement of bitcoin and much lower fees. There are protocols like Cashu [1] that allow you to transact offline anonymously for no fees and settle on the lightning network.

Why do you need "diversity of assets to transact with"? Go to any store in almost any country and they usually accept a single currency. Maybe in some they take local + USD. You're arguing for something the market doesn't seem to care about outside of speculative trading for fiat gains.

And even if you really want stablecoins they've been added to bitcoin via the lightning network and taproot assets. Tether for example can be used via bitcoin [2]. There's a reason Bitcoin makes up well over 50% of the total crypto market.

----

1. https://cashu.space/

2. https://www.coindesk.com/business/2025/01/30/tether-brings-i...
It’s wages per year with IIRC 8% of the workers taking the deal.
Here is the content of the page you linked:

>On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:33:22PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> I accept that you don't want to be involved with Rust in the kernel, which is
> why we offered to maintain the Rust abstraction layer for the DMA coherent
> allocator as a separate component (which it would be anyways) ourselves.

>Which doesn't help me a bit. Every additional bit that the another
language creeps in drastically reduces the maintainability of the kernel
as an integrated project. The only reason Linux managed to survive so
long is by not having internal boundaries, and adding another language
complely breaks this. You might not like my answer, but I will do
everything I can do to stop this. This is NOT because I hate Rust.
While not my favourite language it's definitively one of the best new
ones and I encourage people to use it for new projects where it fits.
I do not want it anywhere near a huge C code base that I need to
maintain.

You have either pasted the wrong link, or are editorializing the title.
Are you actually legally on the hook to pay? Or are they just going after you because they think they have a better chance of getting you to pay than the government?
Location: SF, CA

Remote: Open to remote or hybrid

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Rust, Elixir, Typescript, Python, C++, WebRTC

Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brian-armstrong-sf/

Email: brian.hn.hireme@gmail.com

Hi HN. I'm currently considering my next job. Previously I worked at Discord for 7 years, mostly on the WebRTC Infrastructure team, where I helped scale and improve the reliability of Discord's Voice and Video calling. I also created a Go service to handle resizing of hundreds of millions of attachments per day. https://discord.com/blog/how-discord-resizes-150-million-ima...

I'm a proponent of going deep to understand technical limitations. I think that clean code and unit tests were always great, and with LLMs at our disposal, are now must-haves. I'm looking for a big challenge and a fearless team.
Attention is all we need.
Watch out, though - I think running MCL crashes some emulators like Mini vMac the last time I checked.
"I dare you to come up with a single example of someone that has a billion dollars in liquid assets."

royal family kingdom of saudi arabia
Deepseek still no.1 on App Store. How..
FurtherAI (YC Startup) | https://www.furtherai.com/ | Frontend, Backend & AI Research | Onsite in San Francisco | Competitive Salary + Equity (in URLs)

At FurtherAI, we're creating vertical AI agents to automate tasks traditionally done by humans. We recently raised a seed round from top investors (announcement soon), growing rapidly, and are looking for superstars to join us on our journey

We are hiring for three roles:

1. Backend/Full Stack Engineer: https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/furtherai/jobs/YZZvimn...

2. Founding Applied Research Engineer: https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/furtherai/jobs/MCLEvo5...

3. Frontend Engineer (Web): https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/furtherai/jobs/zrN2j29...

Apply on the URLs or email sg+hn@furtherai.com with your resume, github, and the most impressive thing you've built.
"I will do everything I can do to stop this", where "this" is a sub-project that has been explicitly approved by project leadership, is not an appropriate justification for blocking some minor patch whose only "fault" is that it contributes to the approved sub-project.
Seeing as shrew-like animals are the oldest species of mammals and date all the way back to Triassic era, if you killed off one rodent species another would necessarily take its place. They also managed to survive several great extinctions in the last 250 million years and gave rise to our own species. Given the importance of them in the food chain, the world would most certainly be worse off without them.
There is no doubt censorship is popular. It's not for me though.
The USD doesn't frequently lose all or nearly all value as we see from cryptocoins. My $10 today will be worth $10 tomorrow barring nuclear war or an apocalypse.
I think we're talking past each other here. The issue is that the enclosed state of counter is exposed globally and can be accessed without synchronization. I suppose yes one could also reassign counter to a different function (and you'd need to be aware of that) but my point is that you still need some kind of sync if you're calling counter all over the place, just like you would with a global variable
If Biden created a branch of the government called "Freedom, Liberty, and Happiness for America" with enormous funding and filled it with his allies and sycophants with dubious goals, would you say its critics are "against freedom and liberty"? Why would anyone be opposed unless you hate America?
Well, if you want to just-in-time compile, then it seems like a compiler is one way to go.

They are now in the size realm of Lisp and Smalltalk. Forth may lean towards the lighter side.
Not looking to apply, but can I DM you when the E train is late again?
That's not the stated reason why they're dragging their feet.
Also the Clinton administration where we were told repeatedly that the private actions of the president, and accusations of sexual misconduct have no bearing on their ability to be president. I’d also say the reaction to the Bush v. Gore election which solidified in the public consciousness the idea both of unreliable elections and that an election could be (and depending on what corner of the political world you were in, was) stolen. Decades of telling voters that if you don’t vote for one of the “lesser of two evils” you’re throwing away your vote. Decades of congress abdicating their responsibility to the executive branch to avoid the electoral consequences. Decades of cheering on executive fiat changing the rule of the land (see Net Neutrality) like it was a good thing (or at least like it is when one’s chosen team is enacting one’s preferred policies). Or happily going along with the president blatantly and openly refusing to enforce the laws as passed by congress (see federal enforcement of drug laws), again at least when one’s own team is the one doing the ignoring.

I used to think that people really just weren’t paying attention to the sort of precedents they’re setting when they do certain things. But the older I get, the more I’m convinced that it’s intentional. Take the dreaded “filibuster” that supposedly prevents congress from anything (except apparently banning Tik Tok). The filibuster in general, and its current form specifically are entirely products of congresses own rules. At any time, congress can decide by simple majority to change the rules of their proceedings and they could do anything from requiring that you actually get on the floor and speak instead of just declaring “filibuster” like some Magic: the Gathering spell. Or they could reduce the vote requirements to override a filibuster. Or they could abolish the thing completely and declare all their laws pass with a simple majority vote. So there must be some reason why they don’t do this, why it’s not the number one agenda item the moment the Democrats get any major it in congress. And the only logical conclusion is the current state of affairs benefits the congressional reps and that’s more important to them than the overall functioning of the system.
> One option is Taiwan

Ummm... yeah, I think that could easily end up in the category of "making it worse for yourself" given the geopolitical risk.
Facial recognition is illegal where I live, both for gov't and commercial uses. Several major cities in the US have banned it (e.g., San Francisco, Boston, etc.).
With generative AI, MIT chemists quickly calculate 3D genomic structures
I think we're talking about different things. The history of human government is chockablock full of corruption. Not just in the US, but everywhere. Individuals with power often use it to enrich themselves at the expense of the public.

The people currently arrogating unaccountable power, illegally, have given us no reason whatsoever to trust them to use it for the public good rather than their own enrichment.
Sorry to come off as a crackpot, but pilot-wave theory did try to fix the problems of BKS by forcing the conservation of energy-momentum in their updated version of the "virtual field".

Of course, Bohm also tried to do a sleight of hand with causality
I have a project which uses weather info to predict avalanche risk. Reading the articles its hard for me to understand whether this would apply or not but my feeling is it might (If I ever need to run this in the EU I would talk to a lawyer).
https://openavalancheproject.org
> I think it’s quite likely the national security apparatus knows something

I couldn’t help but lol when I read that.
I ended up playing with the background animtation on your website for 10 minutes, was fun
Dark Gothic MAGA: How Tech Billionaires Plan to Destroy America [video]
I mean... if you make a robot capable enough to move in a non-plane sidewalk, cross streets, climb into guts, and etc, it will still lose to rats.

I'm not confident I could win in a fight against a pair of rats, even if I have bats or guns or whatever.
It's neat to know that, whether the files prove something or don't, theorists will refuse to accept them unless they prove JFK wasn't shot by Oswald.
> I think the idea was to wait for people mentioned in those documents to die, so as to not affect their privacy

I also remember that story, but it's no justification for keeping something with this much public interest secret.
Here’s the entire sentence:

> There are currently 214 operational chargers in 12 states that have been funded through the law, with 24,800 projects underway across the country, according to the Federal Highway Administration.

I can see why you omitted the context.
Hawley limited power this is an attention ploy.
You are conflating debt and deficit. Cutting the deficit by a few hundred billion dollars will barely impact the rate of growth of the debt, it's not a "radical improvement in the national debt", it's a modest reduction in spending.
Years ago I built a service that would print family & friend Instagram and Facebook posts and automatically mail them to an incarcerated loved one. I joked that it will be technically possible to convert the videos to flip books, and here you have gone and done it!
Reddit - "Pink mist them all" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrYxMsWmrjk (Screen caps on Twitter etc. if someone wants to find and link them)

Mocking != doxing.

Musk was horrid to do that, but it's a different thing.
Yes, you need git with git lfs. Then just: `git clone https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1`
It's not about a US advantage in AI. It's about politicians restricting our freedom and violating their oath to uphold the Constitution.
A Plan for Establishing a United States Sovereign Wealth Fund
That is totally hyperbolic. I think it is true that birth-right citizenship is part of the 14th amendment and the Trump administration will fail in this challenge. However, there is some debate about it among legal scholars, though, again, I think the weight of the evidence is in favor of birth-right citizenship,

However, disagreeing about the interpretation of the constitution when it is not actually that "plainly" clear, it has been supported by precedent is not the same as ignoring the constitution. In fact, it sets up a challenge for the Court to decide and it will almost certainly find in favor of this kind of citizenship.

Many presidents, including Obama, have put forth orders and supported legislation that was ultimately found to be unconstitutional; it does not mean they were running a monarchy or whatever the left is implying.
No. No liberal capitalist economy has ever had a famine. By contrast, most communist economies have created major famines, and history's largest famines have all been created by communist economies, outdoing even colonialism in their death tolls.

These are well-known historical facts.
Using a machine, instrument or technology for some intended outcome will nevertheless have a distribution of outcomes. Some good some bad. A kitchen knife will usually cut food, but will occasionally cut your finger. If maliciously used the bad outcomes become a lot more.

Two different machines can be designed for the same use case, but the possible bad outcomes in either "correct" use or malicious use of the two machines can be very different. So it is reasonable to ban the one which has unacceptable bad outcomes.

For example, while both a bicycle and a dirt bike are mobility vehicles, a park may allow one and ban the other.
It is deeply telling that DOGE is relying on inexperienced anyone.
Thanks for that! Yup I'm well aware of the differences between literary and casual (and of course the differences between Standard Chinese and Written Cantonese). My goal for this project is to help preserve and teach the Cantonese language based on my understanding (which is still improving), but more importantly teaching it as a completely independent language because that's what it is. In this instance Standard Chinese or any sort of literary pronunciation is essentially useless to me since people aren't speaking that way, and I also am a strong believer of writing the way you speak. Mandarin speakers also used to have this problem until the mid 1800s when the transition from 古文 to 白話 took place, and standardized on Beijing dialect.

And you are definitely right about 懶音. They are both explained in the same section not because they are the same thing but because they are both modifications occuring for the sound pronunciations.
Lung cancer diagnoses on the rise among never-smokers worldwide
Implementing a linear collider facility at CERN
Sometimes you don't need sources to verify something is correct, its something you can directly verify. To reduce it to the easiest version of this, I ask for code to do something, it writes me code, I run my unit test, it passes, my time is saved!

For other things, it depends, but if I'm asking it to do a survey I can look at its results and see if they fit what I'm looking for, check the sources it gives me, etc. People pay analysts/paralegals/assistants to do exactly this kind of work all the time expecting that they will need to check it over. I don't see how this is any different.

I don't think the library/electricity responses are serious but to move on to the point about degrees... people also got those degrees before calculators, before computers, before air travel, before video calls, before the internet, before electricity, yet all of those things assist in creating knowledge. I think its perfectly reasonable to look at these LLMs/chat assistants in the same light: as a tool that can augment human productivity in its own way.
> his base doesn't even know the extent of what is going on

Twitter has realtime status updates and feedback from said base—and others.
There's two points here:

1. Most US media (especially radio) being conservative allowed Republicans to define Democrats in their terms. Consequently, the "Democrats are all trans rights and DEI" was a Republican choice.

2. The Democrats certainly didn't make it hard for (1) to happen.
I think that's bad, but I also think it is less likely to be an effective strategy for the current regime than a lot of other things.
Amazed at the pushback against an effort to cut waste out of government. There is a ton of it. It's your tax dollars being wasted... let's instead discuss whether things they've identified are keep, toss, or reform and if the wrong call has been made.
Oh yeah, we wouldn't want the United States to be influenced into making a stupid, irrational mistake.
Ah, nevermind, just saxophones:

> ... tenor processing unit...
Theres a long story about noise complaints you should listen too. They had them then got rid of them.
People also seem to think that an autocratic takeover can't happen if the autocrat was elected. In fact, most autocratic takeovers begin with a democratic election.
Here is a more controversial point:
Are you interested in adding a preliminary tail-call instruction?

The WASM spec people rejected it for being too "high-level". But the C committee also rejected proposals from Dennis Ritchie. My money is still on Ritchie. Rob Pike's money seems to be on Ritchie direction as well. Otherwise, why create Golang?

Tail-calls are only high-level if calls are high-level.
This looks like a really cool tool, I'll be recommending it to my lawyer friends
If you're an actual attorney, you should be disbarred. Not sorry.
The IMF will definitely not accept repayment in El Salvador's own fiat currency! That would be obviously stupid of them.
I had two links open and pasted the wrong link. This is the correct link: https://social.treehouse.systems/@marcan/113941358237899362

Sorry for the confusion!