skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because they see themselves as Democrats and Republicans more than they see themselves as Members of Congress. The identity/loyalty issue seems to be the main problem.

If they see themselves first as Members of Congress, then they should try to seek more power for Congress, not for their parties.
What was the marketing approach so far? The usual producthunt launch + submitting the tool to many directories?

On HN you can use https://news.ycombinator.com/show which requires less upvotes to get visibility. Without 'Show HN' in the title new tools get overlooked easily. Not sure if your target audience (Wordpress agencies?) hang out on HN though
> JFK stuff was also declassified under Biden. No one cares because there's nothing in it.

A post about it is trending on HN so saying "no one cares" is a dismissal about the interest on this topic. Your very contribution to the post ironically contradicts the content of your message
Do you want LLMs that monitor your work as if you are an Amazon factory worker...
and then one day you wake up in a Cube that you helped design.
Obama was further to the right than the conservatives in the UK at the time.
The law specifically refers to putting a product in to service or placing a product on the market if they are on the prohibited (article 5) or high-risk (article 6, annex III) list and don't have an applicable exception. IANAL, but it's pretty obvious that a set of weights alone clearly is not such a product.

Also note that the law has explicit exceptions for research, development, open source and personal use.
The 2009 English-language series or the 2015 French-language series? Both share the same title.
Perhaps the more pertinent question is what if the US gov doesn't recognize the risk and allow insurers to raise rates. A now significant portion of the problem is the fact that California's FAIR plan will potentially be insolvent. In this case, the market was correct, not the gov.
Supabase.io | Customer Solution Architect / Engineer | Full-time | REMOTE (US)

I am one of the first SAs at Supabase and our role is to help onboard, optimise and advise on all parts of the Supabase platform.

No need to be a postgres expert, you will be working with customers of all sizes and using all aspects of the platform. One minute you might be onboarding an engineering team and the next you might be helping an existing customer with their scaling plans for the next 6 months or triaging a bug/feature request to ensure the Product team understands the context and priority.
Technical skills are vital but "self-starter" is equally key. Being able to determine what cases need your attention compared to those that need escalating to Product or Engineering. Excellent comms skills (internal and external) certainly help, too!

I wanted to work at Supabase because of its open source nature and I want to stay here because of its fully remote, autonomous nature. Trust first in the work we do and it is easy to grab a member of the team to solve a problem async.

Job post and application details are here: https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/supabase/d5573afa-636c-4219-832f-38...

Feel free to message me directly if you have questions (chris.gwilliams)
I don't see the parallels. When are the academics going to be sent to the countryside and where are the self criticism sessions being held?
For either option you can trace the intention of the definitions to "was it a human coding the decision or not". Did a human decide the branches of the literal or figurative "if"?

The distinction is accountability. Determining whether a human decided the outcome, or it was decided by an obscure black box where data is algebraically twisted and turned in a way no human can fully predict today.

Legally that accountability makes all the difference. It's why companies scurry to use AI for all the crap they want to wash their hands of. "Unacceptable risk AI" will probably simply mean "AI where no human accepted the risk", and with it the legal repercussions for the AI's output.
The title is a bit absurd as it's the law that defines what's acceptable and what isn't. Anything that this regulation doesn't allow is by definition "unacceptable", even if it's tea with biscuits.
I'm not saying the current system is perfect but most people owed money can receive money in a bank account while most probably don't have a bitcoin wallet. Physical cash while legal is fading from use for large transactions.
Based on exactly what should the computers make management decisions?

Reports filed by humans? Or meaningless automated metrics?
Is it truly a problem if families move away from areas of high-risk natural disasters?
The whole sentence does though.
From my (maybe naive) understanding of current economic theory, it's that a small amount of inflation is what grows an economy. And an important part of that is unpredictable levels of inflation/deflation.

So I'd assume a small amount of predictable deflation would shrink an economy.

Anyone know more about this?
What you're doing is removing the incentive for criminals to cause damage to innocent people by assuming another real person's identity instead of just creating a new one.
Right, and I think the average American citizen at the time would consider the current immigration situation in America to be straightforwardly insane. They were really incredibly racist by today’s standards back then.

So it’s quite weird to reference that poem as if America is in danger of losing some virtue it used to have back at that time, when if anything it is in danger of returning to the actual mainstream views at the time the poem was written.
TIL that OWASP has a bunch of Top 10 projects other than application security. Some others I found:

- Top 10 for LLMs - https://owasp.org/www-project-top-10-for-large-language-mode...

- Top 10 for OT - https://ot.owasp.org/

- Top 10 for Smart Contracts - https://owasp.org/www-project-smart-contract-top-10/

- Top 10 for Open Source Software - https://owasp.org/www-project-open-source-software-top-10/
Unfortunately a lot of things are just plain stupid.
I agree that the announcement should´ve talked more about goals and performance than regulatory stuff ;-).

But I think there is a new understanding among the bureaucracy that regulation (alone, without innovation) will kill Europe´s competitiveness and that some acceleration and cutting of red tape is necessary.

Can't say with certainty that this will be successful.
But that we, as a very young startup that is barely known outside of our AI Open Source niche, are part of this, is already a sign in itself - a year ago I´d have never believed that this might be an option (and also probably would've declined if someone asked us to join a EU-funded project).

We will have engineers without a degree (but hundreds of thousands of HF downloads) working side-by-side with some of the top researchers + HPC centers.
While it makes sense that you landed on PNVI-ae-udi for C because of its prior baggage, I don't see how this makes a good choice for a language without that baggage.

For one thing, I'm pretty sure systems languages don't need to combine these two ideas at all. In C there's a single pointer type and so it has both uses too bad, but in a hypothetical new language you don't need to do that and I think it would be clearer not to.
>How does this play with copyright on things like the product text and images?

We've been careful to abide by web scraping precedence. So all data we collect from Shopify and WooCommerce stores is publicly available. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiQ_Labs_v._LinkedIn

We don't own or claim to own the copyright for product text and images. And make this clear with the store name, brand name, website, and more. That all said, we may be able to add a field on the Product Detail API that makes it clear who owns the copyright. https://docs.searchagora.com/api/endpoints/product-detail

>Which legal entity will end customers have a monetary relation with?

Using the Agora API, you become the merchant of record. Customers have a relationship with your app (i.e. Agora is hidden to the end customer). We are working on providing support for passing the payment to the end Shopify or WooCommerce store. We imagine having several payment flow options in the future: process payments on your own Stripe account, process payments with Agora, or pass through payments to the stores.
There's a "sweet spot" between startup and enterprise where the cloud makes zero sense.

Startups will benefit from the cloud, as it allows them to easily scale, and maintain infrastructure that would otherwise be very costly.

Then at some point, around 50-100 employees (depending on business), it makes more sense to have a server park sitting at home, and you probably have the revenue to hire a couple of system administrators to handle stuff.

Then you have enterprise customers with 500+ employees, who have compliance and governance to follow, who maybe has huge spikes during a month (banks for one experience a lot more load during payday), which you will have to pay for in your local server farm, but you can dynamically scale in a cloud data center.

Not that you can just "throw everything in the cloud", it still requires planning for the best cost optimizing, but once you reach enterprise level you can probably afford a couple of cloud architects or similar to facilitate this.
Ok so even if I agree with your description of those two events, two things don't make "happens all the time".
The same data available to current human managers.
It's unclear whether "may" means "can (and does)" or whether it renders that entire clause optional.
Talk about biting off more than one can chew.
The fact that you don't have an answer make's GP's point. This isn't actually a problem with the standard library because the semantics are clear.
I think Biden sniffing every kid he could get his hands on qualifies as "hiding in plain sight".
Pretty sure I'm already extensively monitored at work, and so are most people, so I'm not sure that'd be new.
> reference that poem as if America is in danger of losing some virtue it used to have back at that time, when if anything it is in danger of returning to the actual mainstream views at the time the poem was written

I literally just quoted the poem. If anything, this thread is the most-interesting literary criticism of it I've seen. It's a Rorscach test of something, and I'm genuinely unsure what that something is.
LLM composes logic programs which call on LLM to compose more logic programs ...
The recursive nature of this architecture could lead to long chains of reasoning punctuated by brilliant moments of imagination.
>hallucinated gobbledygook

Train on hallucinated gobbledygook get hallucinated gobbledygook as output. Especially in the humanities the BS factory has been spinning for half a century or more.
A post is trending about the declassification which hasn't actually happened yet. It's not trending about the content of the documents, or even discussing previous documents, in fact no one is even discussing what was in the previous thousands of pages of declassified material.

People care about the idea of the story, not the reality.

JFK investigation documents have been declassified repeatedly, and no one even has any common reference points they bring up about them because ultimately there's nothing there. So this is just the new fantasy: "now, NOW! They'll totally declassify the memo ordering the CIA hit on JFK using mob money and then framing Oswald for it! They've had it the whole time!"
Many feel that the status quo represents wolves looting the taxpayers. 3T in deficit spending is a bit much. Where was the "hypervigilance" before this? There was no public spotlight on the engineers appointed to manage these systems previously.

If we are to be balanced in our consideration here, it would be reasonable to consider the possibility that the established media voices may be objecting to an entrenched network of corruption unwinding. These are the stated reasons for the audit. It is worth at least considering them at face value. Reasonable people should be able to debate these things without resorting to reducto-ad-hitlerum.

Given that none of the coverage presented by the sources has even considered the opposition's argument, it isn't unreasonable to characterize it as unbalanced partisanship. Yes, a young engineer has access to this data. Previously an unnamed engineer appointed by an unelected bureaucrat also had access. Yet the partisans were not invoking crass analogies at that time. Nobody was raising the alarms about IRS agents or Treasury employees having access to the same data. Regardless of where we are on the partisan spectrum, we should be able to recognize this as hypocritical and more than a little bit suspicious.

https://xcancel.com/elonmusk/status/1886301159398535632

https://xcancel.com/ThomasEWoods/status/1886078877363327337
"A few times in the last 5 years or so" != "all the time".
Well, people keep riding the AGI train, no? Surely a superintelligence should be able to overcome its own biases, right? If there's any bar I'd pose for an intelligence to be "super", this would definitely be one of them. Even with regular humans, being open minded, willing to critically rethink their own stance, and being open for discussions is generally regarded as a sign of intelligence, after all.
I personally like the API one:
https://owasp.org/API-Security/editions/2023/en/0x11-t10/

So many basic screwups.
There are certainly sympathetic federal judges, including on the supreme court, but as a whole the judiciary is not (yet) owned
That has to be it! Nice find! I searched for a while and came up blank. You can see how someone would see that commercial and end up with Clint Eastwood.

Thank you :)
If you want to get rid of the Permanent Resident status for parents of citizens, go ahead; perfectly constitutional.

But I suspect that isn't the limit anti-14th-amendment people's ambitions.
The "high risk" list, though, is essentially traditional safety functions (article 6) and functions that affect fundamental rights and access to basic services (annex III)? It's not that broad at all either.
I guess it depends on what you mean by normal. The point I am trying to make is it is common for Presidents to do things which are later deemed illegal.
Just to balance the other comments here: one of the interviews was a mock sales call where you had to pretend to be selling a SaaS product to the interviewer. Not fun for an introverted developer, and not specified up front. Also if you do the paid take-home project, they mean reasonable rates for full-time, not reasonable rates for freelance.
Since this needs 3d acceleration I would guess this does not work? Waydroid is insanely good with this (when it is running).
Even if that were true, it's far better than an unqualified, untrained, and unaccountable group who's only mission seems to be institutional destruction and theft.
Chess solvers are more AI than 90% of the things currently being touted as AI!
> When did the political system stop being about making life better for the average person?

In the US, when we elected mediocre actor Ronald Reagan, I think. His trickle-down economics nonsense turned out to be a just and early example of catering to the rich in broad daylight instead of behind closed doors. And the people, for the most part, bought it, so now we have legal scams like 401ks that the average citizen thinks are there to help them.

The point has always been to seize control of the money while removing all accountability and they are finally succeeding because liberals handed them the election over Gaza, which is no longer in even in our news cycle.

It all makes my stomach turn, to be honest.
Can you explain why this makes him a good fit for doing government payroll?
Thank you!

Yes, exactly. We published on: ProductHunt, Medium, X and here.
Also some sharing from our friends in networks.

Nice, I will try it over there as well.
Not necessary, just out of fear. They capitulated to Trump's threats instead of standing up and fighting hard for principles.
He's following the Project 2025 playbook and during his campaign he specifically claimed he would not be implementing Project 2025.

Democrats were warning that he was lying about his intentions, and that he would in fact implement Project 2025, but that is not equivalent to him campaigning on Project 2025. I think this is an important distinction.
I also go to museums and play with the exhibits.
In servers, IOT, embedded... Windows doesn't exist.
Bootstrap Principle for the Spectrum and Scattering of Strings (2024)
Anyone with the power to stop injustice should do so. That's not a controversial position at all.
An iPad is more portable and lighter and cheaper than a MacBook. On some days I would like to use a tablet for much of my day (between meetings, checking emails) and switch to a laptop like experience for an hour or so.
None of which qualifies him for anything he’s doing here.
Without this symbiotic relationship in cellular life on other planets, would it prevent complex cellular life?
> Many feel that the status quo represents wolves looting the taxpayers

Many feel lots of things. If this is acceptable then the next Democrat who wins Presidency should go in and delete federal leases they don't like. (More realistically: delete all the student loan records. I don't even think those touch state laws, so you'd be fully cleared with a pardon.)

> it would be reasonable to consider the possibility that the established media voices may be objecting to an entrenched network of corruption unwinding

Not really. Or maybe we see the problem with having a rando with read-write access to sensitive public infrastructure.

> Reasonable people should be able to debate these things without resorting to reducto-ad-hitlerum

You're the only one bringing up Hitler in this thread.

> none of the coverage presented by the sources has even considered the opposition's argument

Not everything needs to be both sided. This isn't a partisan issue. It's not even binary--plenty of people agree with DOGE having some access but not this.

> Previously an unnamed engineer appointed by an unelected bureaucrat also had access

An unnamed engineer hired by an unelected bureucrat. (After being screened by another group. Subject to conflicts and financial-disclosure rules to an agency.) Such bureaucrat eventually reporting to someone appointed by an elected and confirmed by other electeds.

The people in this chain who report to Bessent did not clear this access. Based on Bessent's statements, he didn't clear read-write access. Legally speaking, this man breached our payments system.
> As for the other criteria, they're so vague I think a thermostat might apply.

As long as the thermostat doesn't control people's lives, that's fine.
Debian Powered Phone: FuriPhone
Elon Musk's goal is to gain as much power and control as possible. Line go up.
> It’s impossible to make a point with people like you

What a coincidence! I think exactly the same about you!
I meant voting population as in population of people that voted not population of people eligible and registered to vote.
They just to "fine tune it" for the EU 24 official languages :)
I don't believe that's even possible — I'd love to see an example. How do you define anything 100% literally, 100% unambiguously? You'd have to include the entire language in your definition for a start, and keep that constantly updated.
I meant that the inputs from TFA would be easily identifiable as there was no attempt to ‘humanise’ the inputs. If the author had attempted to do so then obviously it’s more difficult (or possibly impossible).
This photograph was of a bone cancer cell.

I had heard that cancer (in general) suppressed mitochondria in preference for anaerobic respiration, and that apoptosis commonly involves these organelles.

Not this cancer cell, it would seem.
In the early 2000s, bringing China into the global community was widely seen as a strategic decision. The Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations supported integrating China’s economy into the international rules-based system.

China did not want to integrate. China has been seeking strategic independence in its economy by developing alternative layers of global economic ties, including the Belt and Road Initiative, PRC-centered supply chains, and emerging country groupings for longer than US.

Too much technological ties with China are seen as a potential vulnerability. It's not just technology itself, but it's importance in trade and economy. If the US or its allies have value chains tightly integrated with China on strategic components, it creates dependence.
It's already multilingual in most of those languages, if not all.
That’s interesting. Tailscale userspace mode does not require tun write access as (I believe) is implemented within the process that runs the gvisor stack (tailscaled). I am wondering if httptap could use the same approach?
How can someone miss things like forced sterilization of indigenous women[0]?

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Agency_for_Inter...
There's a deep irony in both acknowledging that humans thrive on cooperation and building on the work of those that came before us, and yet also wanting to forcibly disrupt that process and centrally re-distribute wealth to less efficient but "fair" means every time someone dies.

"Hoarding wealth" is the entire reason we have capital to invest in new ideas and innovations.

Fairness sounds great of course! Who doesn't like fairness? The problem is, true fairness is neither achievable nor desirable, given the realities of human nature.

When you aim to force it onto the world via centralized authority, it generally results in worse outcomes since it can only be enforced punitively via the stick (instead of the carrot) -- creating even less fair power structures than the ones you aim to disrupt.

The point of my sarcastic posts is to illustrate this fundamental misunderstanding of human nature and how the world actually works. Again, we've tried this a million times, with the receipts to show for the results. It's not good.
Yes. First I buy bitcoin from the X, then I transfer it to my bitcoin wallet.

Next I transfer it to kraken, convert it to Monero and deposit it on my drug market of choice.

It used to be simpler but this is how I do it nowadays.
Very grateful for those translations. Use them a lot!
If I had a startup where would I apply to get into this program? Where did your company apply to?
Prompting Depth Anything for 4K Resolution Accurate Metric Depth Estimation
The number of those areas will grow though, so there will be less places to move to.
they should set fake dumpsters around the place (refrigerated obviously) where people can go and pick up this food while also getting the authentic dumpster diving experience
No you’re supporting treasonous actions and you must be taught and discouraged from such actions that violate the will of the people in favor of expeditiousness. Your views are a danger to a stably growing society.
> This is why Result (or Maybe, or runExceptT, and so on in other languages) is a perfectly safe way of handling unexpected or invalid data.

They are great for handling expected errors that make sense to handle explicitly.

If you try to wrap up any possible error that could ever happen in them you will generate horrendous code, always having to unwrap things, everything is a Maybe. No thanks.

I know it is tempting to think "I will write the perfect program and handle all possible errors and it will never crash" but that just results in overly complex code that ends up having more bugs and makes debugging harder. Let it crash. At the point where the error happened, don't just kick the bucket down the road. Just log the the problem and call it a day. Exceptions are an amazing tool to have for things that are.. exceptions.
I assume this is already the case
Apple's Lack of Full Site Isolation and iOS Browser Ban Puts Users at Risk