skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Some of images in the link are AI generated. Some people instantly notice AI generated contents, some don't.

It seems to me that this realization is often accompanied by deep emotional negativity, regardless of opinions.
I think slices and interfaces in Go are both 2×usize width, in which case you just need double-width CAS to make them safe from data races - which most modern architectures support.
A lot of times these 89% are not legally allowed to sell their products, as USDA and FDA require them to outsiurce processing. In the few cases where farmers just do it anyways, the long arm of the law strikes with extreme prejudice, e.g. see Amish farmers selling unpasteurized yoghurt and cheese –products which derive their value by being spoiled through probiotic micro organisms.

Loosen up regulations, but allow everyone to be accountable again, and common law will sort it out.
Maybe you should read up a bit before you repeat false talking points:

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/10/bidens-border-wall-explain...

Biden tried to get congress to re-appropriate the funds. They wouldn't, so he spent it as he was obligated.
I don't view SMS as reliable. It was only a couple years ago that I switched to Signal for a friend after our texts back and forth had been silently dropped one too many times.

I don't know how long RCS has been around, but my impression is most or all of my messages until recently were SMS.

iMessage now says "Text Message - RCS" or "Text Message - SMS" in the text entry box which is better than the green/blue bubble thing (though it does still have that).
Do you think if a non-profit open source dating app existed, with a sizable userbase, results would be different for the average guy?

People are quick to blame the greedy for profit business model, and I'm sure that has something to do with it, but with women swiping left on 95% of profiles (according to the article) it's hard to imagine designing a dating app that changes the math meaningfully. No matter the business model, you're not likely to turn that 95% into 75% or 50%.
Glad to hear it! I hope you enjoy it.
GPT sh!ts the bed 50 to 55% of the time and Im a paying member. It could be them possibly trying to handle the load but it's a bad CX/UX especially when your paying to get errors like "We've detected suspicious activity from your device," and you pretty much are blocked from using it til you come back later. Then it works.. i guess when it's not as busy or overloaded.
I might have missed this in the article - how is the pay level set for ATC staff? In a free market economy price is the magical signal that is supposed to increase supply when there is unmet demand.
So more envelope-math; a containership seems to run $100-200m, so it'd be $300-600m.

That's not so insanely expensive as to be completely undoable.
Pick an arbitrary person and an arbitrary thing and I will find a tenuous chain where the person benefits from the thing. I could probably justify a 90% marginal tax over $100k for you using this if you can give me your zip code.

Queries will cost $1 with quadratic increase.
Finally! I only maintain my facebook account since all big skydiving events are organized on it. Nothing else has approached the convenience. If this is what does it, awesome!
Arnold and Marsden Mathematical Olympiad Circle
One is about a set of words which have no practical effect on function, the other is about an unelected apparatchik with questionable foreign links deliberately destroying the administrative and constitutional integrity of a superpower.

It really isn't a both sides situation.
Doom Running on Apple's Lightning to HDMI Adapter
And they too are getting exactly what they asked for by not voting.
Some of the stuff in these explanations sounds like missing tools. There's a similar thread for a different article going around today, and I kept thinking at various points, "Maybe instead of having an LLM write you unit tests, you should check out Property Based Testing?"

The question I keep asking myself is, "Should we be making tools that auto-write code for us, or should we be using this training data to suss out the missing tools we have where everyone writes the same code 10 times in their careers?"
AI "Agents" that can do tasks outside of the confines of just a chat window are probably the next stage of utility.

The company I work for integrated AI into some of our native content authoring front-end components and people loved it. Our system took a lot of annotating to be able to accurately translate the natural language to the patterns of our system but users so far have found it WAYYY more useful than chat bc it's deeply integrated into the tasks they do anyway.

Figma had a similar success at last year's CONFIG when they revealed AI was renaming default layers names (Layer 1, 2, etc)... something they didn't want to do anyway. I dare say nobody gave a flying f about their "template" AI generation whereas layer renaming got audible cheers. Workflow integration is how you show people AI isn't just replacing their job like some bad sci-fi script.

Workflow integration is going to be big. I think chat will have its place tho; just kind of as an aside in many cases.
> Lina Khan was going to put a stop to it, but tragically that didn't reach its culmination.

Lets not kid ourselves she was going to keep focusing on minimum impact, likely to fail cases with good optics, and inventing more obtuse interpretations of anti-trust law while continuing to ignore any real monopolies she could.
Well, it would be super convenient if you could use the standard collections like Vec, LinkedList, HashMap, etc. just like you would use them normally except now they are allocated inside an mmapped file.
Anyone else who thinks the birthday cake looks disturbing?
> Musk and the Doge employees only have audit power - not executive.

You've said this, but it's obvious that's not what they're doing, and no one is attempting to stop them. Literally unchecked corruption. Musk should be in prison for this - it's very close to treason.
> If CEOs invest heavily in this, they won't back down because no one wants to be wrong.

They might not have to. If the results are bad enough then their companies might straight-up fail. I'd be willing to bet that at least one company has already failed due to betting too heavily on LLMs.

That isn't to say that LLMs have no uses. But just that CEOs willing something to work isn't sufficient to make it work.
But isn’t that the same when people and schools create effing Facebook groups and events or whatever they are called and find it hard to believe that people don’t use that crap. Or create WhatsApp groups and communities and so on and on.
They have no choice but to go bankrupt instead of eating the tarrifs.
I use LLMs to support my programming all day, and I'm not "writing prompts all day long". I'm working just like I used to, only faster.

LLMs make it quicker for me to:

- Decipher obscure error messages

- Knock out a quick exploratory prototype of a new idea, both backend and frontend code

- Write boiler plate code against commonly used libraries

- Debug things: feeding a gnarly bug plus my codebase into Gemini (for long context) or o3-mini can save me a TON of frustration

- Research potential options for libraries that might help with a problem

- Refactor - they're so good at refactoring now

- Write tests. Sometimes I'll have the LLM sketch out a bunch of tests that cover branches I may have not bothered to cover otherwise.

I enjoy working like this a whole lot more than I enjoyed working without them, and I enjoyed programming a lot prior to LLMs.
I do agree with the premise that chatgpt cannot be trusted. It's very good, 80% accuracy is not trivial, but still 20% of errors is a lot.

The issue with the first experiment is that it might be the free version. The author not only doesn't mention the exact revision, but there's no mention of the general model.

There's a cost-saving measure that chatgpt needs to implemnet, increasing the compute and output token count is quite trivial, the fact that the table is reduced to 50 states might be just that, not necessarily a limitation on its intelligence.

Finally the question on vowels is just a very specific and widely known weakness due to tokenization. Nothing new and definitely does not tell us much of how intelligent the model is.

EDIT: I just noticed OP explicitly states it's the unpaid version. Complaining that a free version is not a super intelligent artificial intelligence and expecting to evaluate and make a judgment on it is just missing completely. Shell out 20$ before you want to give us your invaluable input on the state of the art.

Here's the 50 states with your prompt on the paid version
https://chatgpt.com/share/67a29e2d-ff88-800f-985f-a894872813...

If you want to use the free version, or even produce reasonable content with the paid model. Try to split your request into parts instead of asking 5 things in 1 prompt. Like you would any human, if you ask it to do 5 things in 1 day, the result will be worse than if you ask it to do 1 per day.

As is this experiment design is what you get when you are actively trying to fail so you can publish your prewritten rant.
There are plans to release a PDF version; need to fix some formatting issues + convert the animated diagrams into static images.
I love how Zed integrates the chat into IDE. You can essentially edit any part of the history, remove or redo the prompt. I just started to use this feature a couple of days ago and I couldn’t be happier.
Ok, but the iphone isn't remotely the same situation, work load, stress or risk; compared to a car.

I relatively consistently mistype on a touch screen keyboard. That's not too much of an issue.

However, me taking my eyes off the road in a car, (stationary or not) to fiddle with a touchscreen is a major risk.
I personally just enjoy the fine tuning I can do with physical controls.
And the best part, I don't need to look at the control to use it.
With a touch screen, sight is a requirement.
Luma drives me nuts at conferences, I often end up invited to events without an address because they expect you to subscribe to their calendar feed rather than letting me put an entry in my own calendar.
I assume the point of these tutorials is not to show experts how to progress from the state of the art, but to show beginners how to get there. There are a few tutorials like this (build your own text editor, operating system, etc) and I think they are a great idea if done well.
> this is going to sound like I think this can be fixed with a technical solution. I don't)

Why? It's seems ripe for technical solution. Technical solutions have solved tons of things in the past. What's special about air traffic controlling?
Campus attack 'worst mass shooting in Swedish history; around 10 people' killed
It's Microsoft. If they were serious they would have, say, refused to sell Office licenses to the worst-offending police departments. Instead they renamed master to main. If it was me (it's not, I'm a pasty white guy) I'd find it condescending. But it's also harmless, and shorter to type. It's not a hill I'm going to die on, and the false equivalency smacks of bad faith.
From what I heard the San Carlos controller were pissed that their pay was being drastically reduced - especially considering its not a cheap area to live in.
> These kinds of flashpoints are way more likely to cause suffering in the near future than some sort of AGI/ASI.

Ok. Then where does your thinking lead?

One good starting question is: what set of mitigation strategies do we pursue for a probabilistic mix of failure modes?
Undocumented beavers destroy $1M of GDP doing construction without permit.
I concede that it may be possible to iterate faster if one dis-constrains certain safety regulations (FAA, radiation protection, planetary protection).
You can subscribe to Apple TV+ directly through Amazon Prime.
Tbh Apple's RCS implementation is so buggy it almost has me on the "they added bugs to keep people off of it" conspiracy train.

As in, during a conversation my phone would send RCS and the iPhone would reply with SMS only. This has happened multiple times with multiple people, and some where RCS won't let us communicate - the messages just disappear into the void, but only when sent from the iPhone.

https://i.imgur.com/FrMfECA.png
> The US Constitution at its heart is based on a system of checks and balances, both between branches of government and the Federal government and States:

First, this is all a non-sequitur to my argument. When the 3 branches are all in agreement on something then there is no reason for any of them to attempt to stop another branch. This is the case when a party has control over all 3 branches. It's not like China, North Korea, or Russia don't have legislatures and judges; it's just they're in agreement with their president.

But to your point, the constitution is not a document of checks and balances. It's just the agreed upon manor that the government will execute and Congress really has no checks on it's power. Congress can impeach/remove the president and judges; it's supposed to be the supreme branch.

Control-f check [1] => 0 hits

Control-f balance [1] => 0 hits

Some of these things that people call "checks and balances" are just straight up not in the constitution. "Judicial review" is not in the constitution.

[1]: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcri...
Thanks for clarifying, that makes sense, I should probably cool off and let others take the comment reigns.
The best part of this article for me was seeing that Oracle's screenshots were taken in IE.

Yes, those are old by now, but it's still a blast from the past.
Because it is part of the world
The LLM you choose to work with in Cursor makes a big difference, too. I'm a fan of Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
Yes, but at least those don't have hardware lock-in.
While men having to pay is potentially no fun, I think it is definitely men that “make this place this way”. Men act entitled to whatever woman they find attractive. They accordingly act aggressively, don’t respect boundaries both on and offline, and frequently lie about themselves and their intentions to get the girl. Men should take a note from women and be more picky before they pursue (and stop when told no).
I think people misunderstand LLMs, you should think of them like humans with limited recall capabilities. Seems like the author asked to retrieve a lot of data which it is bound to make mistakes as the training data might contain this but only a lossy representation of it, the better way to think is can it generate some SQL given this dataset and provide answers you were looking for just like how humans would approach this type of problem.

I have been experimenting with USDA food database and sending just the metadata of the table structure to the LLM as a prompt so it can write SQL

My prompt is below

----

You are a SQL Generator for USDA Food Database which is stored in sqlite. When generating SQL make sure to use :parameter_name for queries requiring parameters.
Here is the schema:

{% for row in data %}
Table: {{ row.table_name }}
Columns:
{{ row.columns }}
{% endfor %}

You can generate python code to analyze the data only if user requests it, each python code block should be able to run in Jupyter cell fully self contained. Libraries such as matplotlib, numpy, seaborn are installed. You will get the previously executed sql queries by the user in <context> </context>tags

You can access this executed data from cache

```python
import cache
data = cache.get_data('query_hash')
```
the data in the above example is already a pandas data frame

Wait for the user to ask for questions before generating any queries.

----

you can try it out here https://catalyst.voov.ai
Nothing says "sincere, well intentioned audit" quite like a billionaire gloating on social media about shutting down entire departments over the weekend whilst his staff of 7 interns with no auditing experience demand access to everyone's data on the basis they're the United States Digital Service...
The far right accusation was recently removed after they publicised it.

Which dodgy views on far right topics?
Money? Work? Most people around me dedicate their lives to it.
> “Cancel culture” as a distinct novel thing doesn't exist

Remember that something being a culture is about pervasiveness and normalization. It's not a mob harassing your employer because you posted photos with the wrong brand of political attire; it's it being culturally acceptable for a mob to harass your employer because you posted photos with the wrong brand of political attire.

Sure people protesting things is old, like you say. As are groups deciding to not associate with certain people.

But that is not in fact the same a nominally-impartial authorities encouraging protests for the purpose of having an excuse to impose a hecklers' veto on things they don't like.

And it is not the same as targeted harassment of anyone outside the ostracising group who doesn't bow to their demands.
A Pentium 233MMX is capable of DVD playback, so I think voice chat is definitely possible. I've worked on VoIP phones that had slower CPUs and they handled a SIP stack just fine.

A Pentium III 733MHz with 128MB RAM running Win98 works fine for (low-res) video chat. Been there, done that.
Because software engineers are being asked to perform political decisions.
Inspired some incredible albums.
Meetup has become the worst service I use, bar none. They pretty much doubled our group fees from $200 a year to $400 a year, then started putting giant banner ads at the top of all of our member emails, then started locking essential features (like seeing RSVP lists) behind a member-level membership and started begging our members to give them money directly.
> If that is true, then the chief executive would have the authority to instruct the agency to do nothing and spend no money

This is called Impoundment, and is illegal. Just ask Nixon.

The Executive branch is actually required to spend as dictated by Congress. There is a portion of spending that is discretionary, but it's a small minority of the Federal budget, and does not include the things currently being targeted.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impoundment_of_appropriated_...
Where did you get that definition?

And wouldn't "well-regulated" mean organized?

> "a rule the you have to engage with the militia"

To be clear, I was not implying that wording. You changed the musician version too much to swap out single words like that.
Find a poor girl. You are probably going for the ones with a ton of options. Get out of your bubble.
it isn't really just audio though. The pilot is staring at things while talking, and there are automated systems like TCAS that provide alarms and visual indications as well. And a lot of commercial airliners have HUDs.

If anything, the helicopter needed more avoidance technology from the sounds of it. And that has more to do with the lack of integration the military does with civilian systems.
Counting vowels and naming all 50 states on the first try is only reliable with reasoning models. The standard LLMs like 4o struggle a lot with these types of tasks.
> they wouldn’t maintain it like the beavers

What makes you think the beavers will maintain this dam? Beavers may maintain this for multiple generations, or they may move on next year due to predator pressure or lack of food.
When we speak about these 3 issues, there's no need for any propaganda.

Violent crime is out of control.

Illegal immigration is out of control.

Purchasing power of the population went down a lot, while average salaries haven't grown (or dropped significantly in some areas).
At this point it feel like the are just playing with languages.
The link doesn't mention payment collection features but obviously that'll be one of next steps. Congrats, now the famous App Store moderation teams moderates and limits people's income.
A coastal California community is sliding 4 inches a week toward the ocean
I went from 7 copies of Windows 11 Pro in personal use - all purchased at full price - to using none now.

Now they are all combinations of FreeBSD, Debian, and Endeavour.
> Hence my confusion: Why is it bad for the US government to let insurers raise rates?

Because of a very, very, bad decision to make the California (and I really should have written California gov, not US gov) an elected position. And people like voting for the guy who prevents prices from going up.
> Executives like the idea of LLMs because it means they can lay you off; they're not going to care about your opinion on it one way or another.

Probably, but when the time comes for layoffs the ones that will be the first to go are those that are hiding under a rock, claiming that there is no value to those LLM’s even as they’re being replaced.
To point 2: who cares? As a consumer I prefer (1) a team that will not run out of money and sell my data and (2) a free service built-in and well integrated, and (3) not yet another subscription to forget to cancel
I used Copilot for a while (since the beta whenever that was) but recently I stopped and I'm glad I did. I use Claude and DeepSeek for searching documentation and rubber ducking/pair programming style conversations when I'm stuck, but that's about it.

I stick to a "no copy & paste" rule and that includes autocomplete. Interactions are a conversation but I write all my code myself.
I switched to iCloud for my personal email once it supported personal domains (switched from Fastmail). It’s all I need really. Work is Gmail of course, with its annoying-in-retrospect tagging system instead of folders, which causes havoc with traditional mail apps.
A Beginner's Guide to Extending Emacs
All of those genres can be linked to one another and you can continue on down to extreme levels. Rock, punk, metal, funk, country, soul, and reggae alone barely touches on the diversity of string instrument based music. Is this a naming problem for you?

Every noise at once attempts to show the extremes to which music can be classified if you haven't seen it.

I don't see any signs that this evolution has ever stopped or will stop. Artists are obviously limited by physics, what sounds pleasant to us, the instruments that are available, and what is currently in fashion. That we'd have more unique music in a more isolated world seems like a pretty crazy claim to me.
One of the interesting aspects is that organizations with strict hiring requirements have to have deep supply chains in order to meet those requirements. Its always interesting to read an account that describes these otherwise unknown-to-me subcultures.
> "The fundamentals and technology of the job have not changed in decades, despite air traffic exploding in recent years"

Isn't this, ultimately, the real problem? Improved technology with radically more automation would both improve safety and reduce workload on controllers.

What's really needed is some sort of "next-generation ATC" moonshot project. But of course, in such a safety-critical and risk-averse domain, generational improvement is really hard to do. You certainly can't "move fast and break things", so how do you prevent such a project getting bogged down in development hell?
> June 28, 2025: All new developments must comply.

I don't know what the consequences would be for companies, but there is no way this is happening by June 28.
I'm with you on this one. If one's experience is just using it as a general chat bot, then yeah, I can see why people are reluctant thinking it's useless. I have a feeling that a good chunk of people haven't tried to use latest models on a medium-small project from scratch, where you have to play around with its intricacies to build intuition around it.

It becomes some sort of muscle memory, where I can predict whether using LLM would be faster or slower. Or where it's more likely to give bad suggestions or not. Basically treating it as googling skills.
I, for one, welcome our new Apple overlords. I'd like to remind them as a trusted personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves.
> pay-capped by law

Thanks! What an elusive bit of critical damning evidence.