skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In contemporary parlance, “problematic” connotes to me that said individual expresses ideas, in their words, speech, or way of life, that are anathema to the dominant paradigm of thought/manners/civility, but does not necessarily imply anything about the mental health of the related individual.

Disordered thinking of the quality you’ve described is indicative of a serious psychological unwellness that, as the other commenter suggested, suggests paranoid schizophrenia or a related form of psychosis. But I don’t intend to seriously engage in back-of-envelope psychologizing.

Prattling on about irrelevant history and insinuating 9/11 conspiracy theories in a courtroom not at all concerned with either of those items does harm credibility, and I think rightfully.

For reasons of both family and personal history I am genuinely sensitive to the phenomenon of the “deemed crazy” person being consigned to permanent non-consideration of their words and expressions, their concerns, but I also recognize that such legitimate unwellness poses genuine issues for the believability of anything they claim.

Putting my extended aside aside, I would phrase it as “how many people are telling the truth about something, but aren't taken seriously because they're severely psychologically disregulated generally.”

It’s not necessarily outrageous for me to assert that I warned the FBI about 9/11 in June 2000. It seriously harms my credibility if I decide to bring up this grievance when I’m speaking to a judge about my undeserved traffic ticket in October 2024.
Same qntm that wrote There Is No Antimemetics Division
I wonder if Apple will extend their iCloud+ private relay service to apps as a result of this.
Location: Austin, TX
Remote: Preferred remote but all things are negotiable
Willing to relocate: Not really
Technologies: JavaScript, TypeScript, Node, GIT, NPM, React, Web Components, Webpack, Build configuration, Jest, Mocha, ESLint, CSS, SASS, Storybook, Monorepo configuration, TestCafe, Unit testing, End-to-end testing, Integration testing, Backbone, Marionette, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google MUI React UI Components, MySQL, Postgres SQL, SQL Server, C#, Python, Ruby, Rake, Docker, TeamCity, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services, Terraform, PowerShell, Visual Studio, EC2, S3, DynamoDB, Lambda, API Gateway, Cloud Development Kit, EC2 Image Builder, HTML, Internationalization i18n, Localization l10n, Visual Diff testing, Bash scripting, Objective-C, Android Java, Cordova, KendoUI, Flash, Flex, ActionScript
Résumé/CV: https://barrettsonntag.com/Sonntag_Barrett_resume.pdf
Email: barrett@sosuke.com

Is it better that I list everything or just a few things? I'm always conflicted. What if I said TypeScript and React but left out JavaScript? That could mean I never worked with JavaScript right? Which sounds crazy but code camps produce React developers that have no experience outside that framework.
- "For example, we train Claude to refuse to respond to user queries involving the production of biological or chemical weapons."

But seriously: what's the point? Any information Claude can offer about i.e. the synthesis of sarin[0] is public information, which Anthropic scraped from any number of public websites, public search engines, libraries, books, research periodicals.

This is a novel cultural norm, so it should be interrogated: why should we make it become normal, now, to censor college chemistry questions? Why is this the normative, "this is how we must do things" in elite California tech circles? Google doesn't refuse chemistry queries; are they in the wrong? (Should search engines agree to start censoring themselves to align with LLM censorship conventions?) Is Wikipedia also in the wrong, that they host unsafe, harmful chemistry knowledge? What about SciHub? What about all the countless independent websites storing this (elementary, 1930's-era) harmful technical information—should we start doing DNS blocks, should we start seizing web servers, how are we to harmonize internet safety policy in a consistent way?

Because if your position is "we need to scrub Harmful Responses from the internet", you can't just leave it at LLM's and stop there. You need to have some plan to go all the way, or else you're doing something silly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarin#Production_and_structure

(Tangential thought: assigning chemical weapons synthesis problems on exams would be a clever way for chemistry professors, at this moment, to weed out LLM cheaters from their course).
Location:Cambridge, MA (Open to relocation)
Remote: Remote, Hybrid, In person
Willing to relocate: Yes
Technologies: Unity, C#, LLM, Vector embeddings, websockets.
Résumé/CV: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1BrBSGL7_CtHdpdX6ZUCDO3f5oD-kr-q7?usp=sharing

Email: alexanderlaiman@gmail.com

Hi I'm Alex, Im an MIT grad Looking for roles that can combine technical work and engineering with client communication and work across teams. My background is a mix of software engineering, research (both in STEM and ML), and creative work. I have four years of full time industry experience.
I think the question was if Deep Research is available from the API or not.

As far as I know it’s only available through ChatGPT and not the API. Same for o1 Pro Mode.

Anyone using ChatGPT is paying a flat rate and not paying per token. Thought they might run out of messages, based on what price they are paying.
LIGO is better version of Michelson–Morley experiment.
European politicians dont understand anything. We are led by utter morons.
And redditors here complain about trump, I'd much rather have him than these mouthbreathers we have.
Makes me wonder how different this would be in a pre-mechanized world. I can see a lot of comments (presumably from other men) that "everyone has their own preferences" for the types of kinwork to sink effort into.

Imagining a pre-mechanized world, I could imagine so much more "kinwork" that would fall into "traditionally male" roles. Like, helping your family and close friends with stuff like... cleaning the gutters, or putting up a fence, or painting a deck def feels like "kinwork" to me.
Yep, I've got this dataset here: https://contentquant.io/data/newsletters/

Don't have a list of YouTube videos/podcasts, but I'm going to start putting it together.
SEEKING WORK
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Remote: Yes, or local to Los Angeles
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: Python, C/C++, C#, JavaScript, x86 Assembly, YARA, Snort, Bash/zsh, PowerShell, IDA Pro/Hexrays, x64dbg, DNSpy, Cobalt Strike, Impacket, Mythic, Splunk, XWays, Volatility, Wireshark, Burp Suite, Encase, Microsoft Office/GSuite, AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubectl, IceKube, Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Git
Résumé/CV: https://www.mayer.cool/resume.pdf
Email: dan@mayer.cool

SECURITY ENGINEER/SECURITY RESEARCHER/RED TEAM OPERATOR/REVERSE ENGINEER
=====================

Howdy, I'm Dan. I currently am employed as SpecterOps, a premier red team consultancy. I execute bespoke offensive security and application security assessments including binary reverse engineering, vulnerability identification, and attack path assessment via kubernetes and active directory abuse.

In my free time I create video game cheats. You may have seen some of my previous blog posts on the top of Hacker News, emphasis on "hacker" [1][2]!

I will say that I am honestly quite happily employed but I still think it is always worth putting my resume out into the aether.

If my skills seem valuable to your organization, please don't hesitate to reach out - I am very interested in/available for contract work as well!

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35824115

[2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38525978
Amazing, such a great use of the gvisor userspace tcp/ip stack!
I can blame Microsoft. Every other tech company and OS figured out how to make it work and they're not exactly buckling under the weight of legal or political pressure on the matter of flags.
At least for me - Rails solidified my distaste, but Ruby gets tarnished by it.

It's like seeing a c++ codebase riddled with macros. Is c++ directly responsible for the madness? Probably not, but the tooling allowed it.

And Ruby takes a double whammy on this front because Rails was really what drove the popularity. Hard to describe the frustration of hitting a very large Rails codebase and literally not even being able to find the definition for a class because it's got a fairly generic name and is getting auto-loaded in the bowels of the codebase by someone who thought they were clever like 7 years ago.

It's like a special version of DLL hell. Or all the pains of global window/self vars coming from script tags in JS, but at least that gave some breadcrumbs, and the ecosystem is generally moving away from it even if ESM is still painful in a lot of ways.

Either way - I don't like hidden things. I'd much rather see the sausage get made then try to save a couple lines of typing, and the older I get, the more I judge languages on the simple metric of "How well does text-based search work for finding relevant code?". Rails performs really badly on that metric.
Yep, I neglected to consider that the system isn't just self-regulating but also self-calibrating.

Even if we can't _fix_ all those systems, getting reliable predictive/status markers would be a good start. Just being able to scan for ten or twenty blood markers and work out which aspect/s of health someone needs to focus their efforts on improving. It doesn't feel like we're a million miles from being able to do that now.

As to the multiple systems - we probably want to add hormonal and short/medium term regulatory systems to that list (being able to activate even a 40yr old's motivational/dopamine response in a 75yr old would be a significant step). And take into account that there are designed-in trade-offs (slower cellular repair in ageing bodies is very possibly an evolutionary adaptation to deal with higher cancer risk in cells with more mutation damage, for example).
I came here to say precisely the same thing. It's all down to personality. For example, in a relationship between a person high in orderliness and a person low in orderliness, the resultant complaint usually is "I do all the cleaning up around here!" But the complaint could easily run in the other direction: "If your need for orderliness wasn't so high, we wouldn't have to do so much cleaning up around here!"

The same thing is often the case in a relationship where people set the bar around "maintenance of social ties" very differently. The typical couple (in my totally subjective field of experience) is one where the husband is like: "Hey honey, how about we just order pizza for all of our guests for the Thanksgiving party we're hosting this year?" and the wife is like: "Over my dead body!"

Interestingly, those roles are reversed in my own marriage: We recently got married at the courthouse with a vague plan to throw a wedding party at some unspecified future date. It's increasingly looking like my wife just can't be bothered. Meanwhile, I love to cook, and when my wife suggests using stock cubes when we cook for guests, I throw her out of the kitchen and finish the job myself.
"A test payload for Milan and Genoa CPUs that makes the RDRAND instruction return 4"... Turns out kernel RNG belt-and-suspenders was justified?
All of this digital ink spilled when the simple answer is: just stop doing it. Clearly other people don't value your kin work/emotional labor/<insert next neologism>, so either 1) stop doing it, or 2) accept that it won't be valued and carry on. Eventually someone else may pick up the slack if they realize the did, in fact, value it. But can we please just stop with the martyrdom? I'm reminded of the serenity prayer:

"God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,

Courage to change the things I can,

and Wisdom to know the difference."
Traintime is an amazing app. Love it!
This is true to an extent, but I think there are two important things to caution against.

One is that it is super easy for a lazy person to say "you just care about this more than me" when in fact they care about it a lot and will complain if it doesn't happen. This is extremely common, particularly among men, even if I assume in good faith you are not one of these people.

The other is that when you enter into a relationship with someone it is just not possible to completely ignore the things they like and are emotionally invested in. If you marry someone who is a super-christmas-enjoyer then guess what, you are a super-christmas-enjoyer now too (or, to be fair, you are now both somewhere in the middle). Ignoring that you have very different expectations will just cause friction. (so if you really really don't want to care, you are going to have to consciously discuss this and agree to it, and even then I don't actually believe it will work)
Oh! You're right. I suppose I just missed the fact that there's now a skip button/text on the set up screen. Thanks for the correction. And yea its Linux/cross-platform support is also one of the main reasons for why I use it.

I do also remember the part about Exchange not being supported if IMAP is disabled. I had the same issue when I tried to use it at a university, but luckily haven't needed that since. Not surprising to hear that it hasn't changed either.
> find new stablecoin
> look inside
> it's powered by asset speculation

Makes me chuckle every time
If the guy taking orders doesn’t have to take orders in addition to his other work anymore, they can hire less staff overall.
Same with DNA testing really.

A relative did a genealogy test through ancestry.com and suddenly I'm doxed for all eternity.
This is another reason why, if you're a woman, it's incredibly important for you to work hard enough and establish a lifestyle where your husband has the option to stay at home and/or avoid full-time professional work if he so chooses.

It takes an incredible amount of work to run a household. It's not fair to ask him to do two jobs. And that's ESPECIALLY true after you begin having children.

The first thing you (as the woman) must do is get off the hedonistic treadmill of consumerism that drives the desire to have two incomes.
Sounds like it was a lot more about where you lived and a lot less "whether you had a personality". I was never a skater kid and never pretended to be one, but I knew plenty and they wore shirts from Kmart because in rural PA kids aren't going to have access to the whole "authentic punk social infrastructure" or whatever it is that supposedly grants kids access to "personality".
Fantastic article and depth! I came out understanding a good bit more than I knew going in. Thanks!
Law enforcement in the US has a license to kill with paid leave after. The fear that instills in an entire populace is chilling.
Do you have any writeups of this work?
I'm not a mental health professional, and I don't know the author. Please be assured that I don't mean any disrespect whatsoever: consider getting tested for ADHD by a mental health professional.

I was diagnosed very late, since my ADHD was of the "inattentive" kind. I would not be troublesome at home or at school, like an hyperactive child would. A lot of people like this go undiagnosed.

One of the traits of ADHD is that our brains crave novelty, and that is definitely one of my struggles. Having professional help makes a difference.

> When I’m building something, that information is the thing coming to life in front of my eyes, every new button etc is awesome.

The neurotypical version of this is called "being in the zone", which just means "enjoying what you are doing, so holding concentration for long periods of time takes very little effort". The ADHD version of this is more intense, it's called hyperfocus. The activity absorbs all of your attention. You barely feel hunger or sleepiness, you can literally go a it for days, you keep thinking about it while you are not doing it. It's useful if you happen to hyperfocus on something that is helpful to you.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42918285
Or, ya know, you could both chip in in the household work.

That said, I'm not really against the thrust of your post, despite its undercurrent of sexism (I know plenty of relationships where the woman is the breadwinner and the man a househusband). In general, this "division of labor" is a thing that actually tends to work out better when you can focus on one thing at a time.

As a not-perfect analogy, I know divorced couples with kids that actually feel their shared custody arrangement is much better than when they were together (note these couples still like and care for each other, they just don't want to be married). I.e. when it's their turn to have their kids, they're totally focused on their kids, it can be stressful if they're working but they block out all their time to either work or be with their kids. Then, when it's their spouse's turn, they can do whatever the F they want, be completely relaxed, etc.
You are never getting back. Each time it is just an excuse email that you had a lot of candidates etc, but then you are not reaching out and repost this again.
> It's sardonic rather than ironic

Doesn’t seem like that to me, after reading the dictionary definitions.

Sardonic: grimly mocking or cynical.

Ironic: happening in a way contrary to what is expected, and typically causing wry amusement because of this.

Pretty sure I meant the second one.
I found Eliezer's Facebook post which OP likely was thinking of. https://www.facebook.com/yudkowsky/posts/pfbid0WN6GeX8S9DK9T...

> I feel like it should have been obvious to anyone at this point that anybody who openly hates on this community generally or me personally is probably also a bad person inside and has no ethics* and will hurt you if you trust them and will break rules to do so; but in case it wasn't obvious, consider the point made explicitly.

> (Let not this post be construed as casting aspersions on any of the many, many people who've had honest disagreements with me or us, including loud or heated or long ones, that they conducted by debates about ideas rather than insinuations about people.)

Creepy. But after people argued with Eliezer for a considerable time --he made 11 updates. The result was less shockingly bad:

> There's a certain cluster of behaviors and attitudes, which includes things like "getting excited about opportunities to make fun of furries" or uttering phrases like "group X is a bunch of neckbeards". Notably, this is not the same cluster as "strongly and vocally disagreeing with group X about idea Y". Call the first cluster "frobnitz".

> I feel like it should have been obvious to anyone at this point that anybody who openly frobnitzes me, or even more so frobnitzes this community, or even more so still frobnitzes a genuine cinnamon-roll-grade Level Ten Arch-Bodhisattva like Scott Alexander or Scott Aaronson, probably lacks an internal commitment to ordinary interpersonal ethical injunctions and will hurt you if you trust them and will break rules to do so. But in case it wasn't obvious, consider the point made explicitly. (Subtext: Topher Brennan. Do not provide any link in comments to Topher's publication of private emails, explicitly marked as private, from Scott Alexander.)

If this is the only evidence-- OPs allegation is exaggerated but not 'totally made up'.
I started using Grafana Cloud several months ago and hit the same problems, it's impossible to keep the costs manageable. If I have an outage, I'll end up paying more for monitoring and log storage. There are no limits. I ended up cancelling my Pro account purely because of this.
shared_ptr and unique_ptr aren’t useful for reasoning about the lifetimes of stack-based objects (unless you’re willing to require that such objects always be dynamically allocated, which is often not a reasonable requirement).
1. No, the next administration cannot fix everything. A lot of what's being destroyed took decades to create. The loss in international credibility is permanent; the administration after that could well be exactly like this one.

2. We probably won't get into a civil war. I'd say the probability is no more than 5%. That's a bit like saying "There's a 5% chance that I'll into a traffic accident today, and I like those odds".

3. No, they will not change their minds. They will see any negative outcomes as the fault of their political and international opponents, and evidence that they need to do the same things harder.
meta: I'm again requesting that this monthly text be updated to include "4DWW" as a tag (for Four Day Work Week).

While there are very few companies offering this option, it would be an improvement for everyone to have more of this option available. Including it in a monthly message (only 4 extra characters!) would be a step in a better direction.
I believe the "continuous" in Coconut means that the CoT is in the continuous latent space, instead of being on output tokens (see Fig. 1).
Even more scary: without any living relatives, there would be no way to identify himself with that degree of accuracy. Sure, you can disinter a corpse, but that's bureaucratically way more difficult than performing a DNA test on a live human, and assumes you know where your relatives are buried to begin with.
They promised additional details in March - a month away. If they don't release that information in March then you can sharpen your pitchforks.
If the brewery is selling and promoting drinking at work, then yes.
Modern Game Design Document Template
> Intrusive thoughts

An intrusive thought is not necessarily a bad one. Bad thoughts are those that are counter-productive and should be avoided. e.g. self loathing, hatred, paranoia and many more.

> it doesn't mean you're a bad person

Nobody suggested that.

> you can control, is acting/

One's thoughts can also be controlled to a large degree. This is why people practice meditation, affirmations, cultivation of wisdom, gratitude etc.
Ah yes, that is a problem.
This is also the attitude that makes every dumbass think they are above the law.
I've always figured the birds would probably lose focus once in freefall. They'd surely know they were.
The original title is:

> Musk's Takeover Of The Government's Computer Systems Needs To Be Understood As A Cyberattack, Or Worse
I don't think any reasonable person is using "lines of code" as a hard metric for anything -- as you've noted, the quality and impact of code isn't proportional to its length.

Lines of code serves as a directional heuristic at best, but that's ok.
Is Santorini about to Erupt?
A very long time ago there was a program on the Mac. You drew one picture (macdraw maybe), just lines, then a second picture. You could then watch as pix 1 morphed into pix 2. Anyone know where something like that is. A flip book for that would be great.
It's like an Evil Maid attack, except the local Sheriff is in on it and detaining you outside while it happens.
The JSR open governance board
"By the time the ground-up rewrite starts to seem like a good idea, avoidable mistakes have already been made. "

This is the wisdom of devops. Do it well, and things will go smoothly.
how has a diagnosis helped you?
A common issue with this in my view is that in many cases the incentives are all wrong. A man might care a lot about a traditional thanksgiving meal but by consciously or unconsciously presenting a lower bar he can offload responsibility. He might not care about the cards, but he does like getting invited hunting with his BIL which only happens through the maintenance of those relationships. Avoiding acknowledging that those two things are connected allows for pushing off responsibility while reaping the benefits.

There are obviously ways to balance this (she does the cards, I organize the July 4th BBQ) but it definitely requires honesty with each other and ourselves to make that work and avoid falling back on (often gendered) patterns.
I had previously looked at the PNW. I adore seattle , but the earthquake / tsunami / wild fire risk projections are extreme. I know they're retrofitting a lot of infra and housing there, but a cascadia fault quake / tsunami is gonna be a bad time even if fema's 'everything east of I-5 is toast' is overhyped.