skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Google Catches Bing Copying; Microsoft Says 'So What?' - https://www.wired.com/2011/02/bing-copies-google/
Oxford to Cambridge link will be 'Europe's Silicon Valley'
No, the US used to be allies, but that was before Trump.
Sorry, there’s absolutely zero context behind whether a group of humans deserve human rights.
Is SAML any better?
It's so cute how people think anyone obeys robots.txt :)
Bidirectional Typechecking Is Bidirectional
I found it very stylish that you displayed "DEATH NOTE" in the background!
We all use PCs and heck even phones that have thousands of times the system memory of the first PCs.

Making something work really efficiently on older hardware doesn't necessarily imply less demand. If those lessons can be taken and applied to newer generations of hardware, it would seem to make the newer hardware all the more valuable.
I remember one disk defragmentation utility I used on NTFS, Diskkeeper IIRC, was originally written for VMS.
I mean the scale is impressive, but are they complex?
Not possible on Windows, where most Chrome users are on.
Just wanted to say fantastic substack writing. Thanks for linking as I go down this rabbit hole
If you’re looking for Classical - Idagio is amazing.
Here's the typical use case for me: https://diversesystem.bandcamp.com/album/ad-garage

Typically with these, I put the Album Artist as "Diverse System" (this is the name of the "record label"). Each track will have it's own artist. In Jellyfin, there is an Album Artist tab inside a music library, which will group these albums into the Diverse System artist, and artists that only appear as a member of one of these albums will not appear in that tab (as they aren't the artist of an album).

So a bit different from a Compilation as you state it.
> You know what happens to code that works? It ships.

The axiom I share with other engineers (real engineers) is "the first working solution is the final solution.
I have one, but I haven’t been able to install it on a KVM machine. I’ll need to dig into the docs to see what am I doing wrong.
IME OpenAI doesn't block Hong Kong for one, while Anthropic does.

As an aside, this made Cloudflare's AI Gateway an unusable product, as they hilariously put a node in HK so you never know when your Anthropic request is randomly going to fail defeating the whole purpose behind the product.
I think it goes either way. I've posted some adverse remarks about him and I could relate to other people saying "this is tedious and isn't adding to the debate"

I happen to think his tech and financial chops are overrated. Bezos I think, has really solid financials. Both of them have good insight into aspects of market dynamics and are excellent at making money by employing smart people.

Where I come unstuck is their anti union and asocial behaviours, ownership of media, telecommunications and now quite actively "hostile" positions in political spaces like the eu. But.. now I'm being argumentative and I can relate to other people saying "c'mon man, that's tedious"

So .. it depends.
What about…a friend?
The UK doesn't already do that?
It's okay, now they can use ChatGPT to write the stories for them!
Just 20 light years away (As a normie I giggled a little).
I actually find it very readable. It was at least readable enough so I could implement an OAuth2 client from scratch in C# as a student.

However after years I still don't understand the technical differences between OpenID Connect and OAuth2. Can a OAuth2 client connect to a OpenID Connect server?
Pursuing piracy claims against a multi-billion dollar corporation with armies of its own legal sharks and also political lobbying connections is much harder than going after rando sites and casual users of piracy. Ergo, it gets sidestepped.

I have my serious quibbles on how piracy and infringement should be defined. However, as they're often currently defined by those seeking sanctions should mean that organizations like OpenAI would absolutely be considered guilty with their scraping. Yet, they get away with it with essentially no legal sanction. Also, shame you were downvoted for your perfectly reasonable observation of a major hypocrisy.
Is there something wrong with buying services from SpaceX?

Especially when Apple was already buying satellite services for iPhones. This isn't some kind of fake deal to transfer money.
There's an entire universe out there, we will definitely find some useful stuff.
Would they pay that much to fly economy, for a flight half as long? I'm skeptical. (Comparable first-class tickets would be $20k - $50k.)
I wonder if this is why the massive (super)computing investment in edinburgh uni was pulled and redirected to the south. At a national level it could make sense but it's horrifically bad look politically to walk back strategic investment in the north.
Doxing Attack Ongoing at OPM
The article says linked. It could be someone's grandma living outside of China, or it could be a company outside of China with links to DeepSeek.
Gemini 2.0-flash-thinking shows reasoning steps, it's only OpenAI who don't. Anthropic gives their system prompts. Looks to be SamA wanting to keep his company shrouded in mystery to appear stronger than it is.
There's four more years of this. I no longer think there's a happy ending here, and we're way past the point of being merely concerning.
In Pharo discovery coding is really encouraged. I personally like it for writing scrapers and/or web tests (I use Selenium in Pharo). I once had an improvized talk about it [1]. Nowadays, I'm back to Python and JavaScript due to their ecosystems, but for discoverability coding and Selenium-based testing/scraping, I still think the interactive experience in Pharo is unmatched.

[1] https://youtu.be/FeFrt-kdvms?si=g12m7aZtDWtMMgwJ&t=2270
Yes. In the past long-range sea voyages worked exactly in the same way.

They were seen as little more than expensive intellectual curiosities and eccentricities. In fact even once we discovered the New World had Columbus not come back and lied his arse off about riches that existed there only by coincidence (as he'd seen nothing of what he claimed), it's entirely possible that would have been the last journey to the New World for decades if not centuries. And over those decades you'd probably have had more and more of the population believing we never even landed on a New World to begin with.

And it'll be the same in the future. Eventually humanity will become a multiplanetary species and more value will be generated off Earth than on it. And I think we're probably not that far away from such point, but we live at a time when we will happily dump trillions of dollars to fund pointless chaos halfway around the world (that invariably just makes the world less safe for everybody), yet every penny that could take us closer to these species defining events is scrutinized like we're down to our last pennies.

And again - this isn't new. It's been the case for centuries and probably will be the case for the foreseeable future of humanity. It's easy to explain with a tautology - positions of power are held by those attracted to power, and those attracted to power are attracted to power. Once the New World became a means to power, that's when the 'trillions' started pouring in. The same will happen with space.
Well then you would appear to be wrong because buying SGOV, and FDLXX (cash equivalent bonds that track tbills) will give you closer to 5.0% (creating a high yield checking account for daily use). What you are quoting is an APY on a deposit sweep. There are clearly two options to get any % back.[0]

Even if you foolish choose the 2.2% option you would still yield more return on your money than a bank checking account which probably gives you less than 0.01% return.

You can optimize further by cutting Fidelity out of the equation and purchase Tbills on treasurydirect.gov straight from the government creating a high yield savings account with monthly yield.

Even better, Tbills are tax-free at the state and local level.

[0] https://www.fidelity.com/spend-save/fidelity-cash-management...
There's a recent rust available in Fedora. That's what I use.
> What surprises me more is that apple is even working with starlink

Starlink is expected to offer greater bandwidth in the future, but Globalstar allowed Apple to start offering emergency SOS service with 2022 devices.
That's sort of the thing we've recently switched to in Sweden too.

Everyone who pays tax in Sweden also pays the fee for public service. 1% of the income (with a 1347 SEK roof) goes to SVT, SR and UR.

There's historically been a reluctance to making it a tax because public service wants to claim independence from the state. Now it has gone from a mandatory (but escapable) fee to an inescapable mandatory fee. Which is, basically, a tax...
> Deepseek promptly fixed it so that their UI responds with 'Hi! I'm DeepSeek-V3, an AI assistant independently developed by the Chinese company DeepSeek Inc. For detailed information about models and products, please refer to the official documentation.' - but only if you ask that as the first question of the conversation. Bury the 'what model are you' question after a few unrelated questions, and it'll happily tell you it's ChatGPT.

Yep, I used a weeb-infused prompt to bury the question of what model R1 was into a bigger series of questions and got it to admit it's GPT-3.5: https://gist.github.com/Xe/8730107f4a3f4d1d43d25933bc0c91f7.
Did you read the article? The amount of data taken was enough to trip wires.

Microsoft’s security researchers in the fall observed individuals they believe may be linked to DeepSeek exfiltrating a large amount of data using the OpenAI application programming interface, or API.
I manually tag everything using Mp3tag [0]. I've found jellyfin is a bit temperamental picking up the changes after making them.

[0] https://www.mp3tag.de/en/index.html
> Lots of websites have a TOS.

openai did not agree to the TOS of other websites they scraped, so they're not bound by it. It's unclear if the TOS is automatically agreed to by virtue of merely accessing the data that is already supplied in a webpage, without having first actively agree by an action like clicking.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrinkwrap_(contract_law)#Unit...

therefore, openAI is only ever bound by copyright law, and not the TOS of the website. And according to some interpretation of copyright law, these AI models do not constitute distribution of the original training material.
What is the utility in having api-openai-us1.deepseek.com domain?
Yeah, this is not a new concept and I remember seeing one of his videos that explains this concept really well. Here the relevant video from 9 years ago for those uninitiated:

https://youtu.be/jlcmxvQfzKQ?si=zmKT9a3yK5R4Wmg4
I have commented elsewhere that these kinds of export controls do more to stimulate development in your adversary than block them sometimes.

I would say if they didn't fail in execution, they may demonstrably have failed in intent and outcome.
This is an open-weights model. There is literally nothing that the government can do to stop anyone from hosting the model. People hosting R1 have no relationship with MS or OpenAI. There is no contractual violation, no copyright violation.
Those people have a severe lack of imagination, because they fail to see how much worse they can make it for themselves.
Unfortunately, "Gaming" and "Gamers" only refer to video games and their players in modern usage.
"Don't have a bank" is not a proper solution to banking app DRM.
I guess it will become as “horrendous” as the USA norm, while having lower pay and worse conditions.
I analyzed 892 cybersecurity deals worth $60B from 2024, including 271 M&A transactions and 621 funding rounds. The data reveals some interesting trends in AI security funding (96% YoY growth), mega-deals (91% of M&A value in just 10 deals), and public market performance. Lots of charts and data visualizations!
It's kind of crazy how badly Tesla has been dropping the ball since 2020 or so.
As far as Ive seen there's already at least 4 alternative providers out there and that's within days of release. Then there's all the distillations and all the projects to rebuild it. It's not trivial to run it but also nowhere near a significant barrier, especially if it's for personal use. There's another thread here where someone else ran the full model on a beefy Hetzner server. Most people on HN could probably accomplish that given a few days at most, some could do it immediately.
Musk will absolutely have access to any data you send over his network. I would not trust Musk within a light year of my data.
Science YouTuber physicsgirl (Dianna Cowern) stands for the first time in 2 yrs
Not just a moodboard if you can highlight the words you want in your output.
Jesus, both of these issues are sad. This is probably why Bun is winning
38C3 – sixos: a Nix OS without systemd [video]
"We have met the enemy and they is us" except they weren't really an enemy or adversary and the hysteria in the wider press was .. unhelpful.

It could be said it was so unhelpful it was politically unstabilising. But I'd say that was kind of whiny: the election swung on many things, UFO wasn't the biggest one by far.
That looks like a cool project and it could solve many peoples problem
> So they generalize the discovery approach from OpenID Connect specification into RFC8414 that adds a new metadata route under .well-known subpath.
That route contains URLs of the authorization and token endpoints, supported token authentications, OpenID user URL, etc.

“Yo I heard you like URLs so I made URLs for your URLs.”

But seriously…if you’re going to have fixed URLs, why not just have fixed URLs for these endpoints? What does the indirection get you?
Supreme court is in Trump's pocket. You can bet it will be appealed, all the way up, with some new legal theory invented to say that Trump can do whatever he wants.
Hacker News has fickle guidelines around politics that can justify flagging anything post-hoc. There is no hard-and-fast rule banning Musk posts but almost anything mentioning him does tend to get sandbagged these days. Here's a cheat sheet for which politics this site considers offensive since it's confusing to me too:

Ukraine, Russia, Syria, China, Taiwan, Saudi Arabia = Holistic, ethical and apolitical conversation.

Israel/Gaza, Trump, Socialism, IMF, Musk = Subversive flamebait and grounds for banning your account.
Yeah, I remember reading a headline like: "Kremlin can't account for 63% of nearly $4 trillion in assets"

Gotcha! That was actually the Pentagon[1].

[1] https://responsiblestatecraft.org/pentagon-audit-2666415734/
I'd be less amazed if people could articulate why this matters. What is the harm being done here and why is it more costly than GoDaddy raising their prices by a few dollars?
It was indeed an off the record chat, made public.

https://www.benzinga.com/government/22/10/29111070/obamas-ta...
Who gives a hoot.

OpenAI lies and steals and grifts and the sooner the responsibility for or control of any important tech is taken away from them the better.
Ask HN: What moats can be developed in response to DeepSeek?
Based on the current DeepSeek events, what moats can companies like Meta, Google, Amazon, NVIDIA, and OpenAI introduce to defend their position? It seems the dominant thought is “there are no moats,” - but these firms will respond and I'm wondering how these firms will respond in terms of moat-like behavior.
To add to this and to quote a friend who has more NDAs in regards to microarchitecture than I can count and thus shall remain nameless: "You can have a fast CPU or a secure CPU: Pick one". Pretty much everything a modern CPU does has side effects that are something that any sufficiently motivated attacker can find a way to use (most likely). While many are core specific (register rename, execution port usage for example), many are not (speculative execution, speculative loads). Side channels are a persnickety thing, and nearly impossible to fully account for.

Can you make a "Secure" CPU? In theory yes, but it won't be fast or as power efficient as it could in theory be. Because the things that allow those things are all possible side channels. This is why in theory the TPM in your machine is for those sorts of things (allegedly, they have their own side channels).

The harder question is "what is enough?" e.g. at what level does it not matter that much anymore? The answer based on the post above this is based on quite a lot of risk analysis and design considerations. These design decisions were the best balance of security and speed given the available information at the time.

Sure, can you build that theoretically perfect secure CPU? Yes. But, if you can't do anything that actually needs security on it because it's so slow; do you care?
> Boom revealed the final production design of Overture, which is slated to roll out in 2025 and carry its first passengers by 2029.

How is Boom tracking to their timelines?

https://news.aa.com/news/news-details/2022/American-Airlines...
I fully agree, as someone also doing Web development in a similar timeframe, for plenty of stuff we would be better with native apps talking over Internet protocols, no need to transform a platform for interactive documents into a OS.
To this day I still attempt never to click inside a running cmd / powershell console. Too many times script execution has been halted by this. It is probably something that has been fixed long time ago but I am still a bit paranoid about it.
CNN Article which led me to the Chinese article - https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/28/china/china-deepseek-ai-s...

I submitted the translated url but HN changed it to the original so you have to use Google Translate yourself.
If I was OpenAI, I would start worrying about my public image.

The reason Microsoft could get away with being horrible for many years was that they had moat.
> Given that they can, they now need to build a larger one, which with more surface area will be more difficult than this one.

Not only that, but the XB-1 uses "stock" engines, while for the full-scale Overture they want to develop (and build) an all-new supersonic-capable engine. So one more challenge to put on the stack...
I have not checked how that works under the hood, but

> Both methods install the CLI tool, python3.12

Won't that require some compiler (GCC?), kernel headers, openssl-dev/gzip/ffi/other_lib headers to be present on end user system and then compiling Python?

At least that's my experience with ASDF-VM, which uses someother Python-setup toolkit under the hood.
What Google services use Bootstrap? Why would they, given Google's component library is Material and their JS lib is Angular?
What are you talking about? Are you aware that the DeepSeek API has gone down for over a day and DeepSeek claims it's due to a large-scale cyberattack? [1]

HN post about it got 20 points and 5 comments, completely ignored.[2] This one you're commenting on is frontpage.

If HN was so valiantly pro-DeepSeek, their claim would deserve large attention.

[1] status.deepseek.com

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42849570
> but at least... so that it never happens again

lmao, you just got the 2rd of Donald Trump

sure, 4 years later everything will be corrected

then sponsor another genocide or start another war with another lie

and after another 4 year another orange prisident arrive to correct everything

and another war

but at least
Has something like this ever happened before? Did it feel this bad last time around?

This seems especially spooky.
I understood it to come in when the police don't want to admit intelligence from foreign sources in drug cases also.
Safari is Internet Explorer of the 20'
Luckily they didn't build it for under $6M. Not even V3 let alone R1.
Irony in the deepest sense of the word.
> The people did not want this. A majority of voters voted for not Trump.

He won the popular vote though, unless I'm misunderstanding your point.

> He also spent the bulk of his campaign — aided by the press — distancing himself from project 2025.

What specific media companies did this?

I heard nothing but negative things about Trump and constant pointing out ties to project 2025 by all major news networks, cable and textual.

Except maybe Fox, but I don't watch it nor know anyone that does. (Well, not that many people I know even watch or read mainstream news in the first place anymore...)
Of course it has. I read that.

But that's exactly the point, isn't it!?

Many, many of these jobs going up the seniority scale will reappear but be recreated as Schedule Policy/Career.

(Schedule F no longer exists, I think)

I mean, I might be wrong. But wait and see: I don't think I am going to be wrong. It is abundantly clear that Trump and the people around him are trying to create a civil service that is loyal to the President specifically.

He tried before to do this which is why Biden produced legislation to make it difficult.

Trump's stated aim in this presidency, as well as in his prior presidency, has been to radically expand the range of jobs that fall under Schedule F.

If you don't know that, then you have not been paying attention. It's safe to assume he will use every lever possible to remake roles as political appointments, and this will be one of those levers.

ETA: Speaking to CNN on Tuesday, Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, said the government's two million workers were "overwhelmingly left of centre", adding it was "essential" for Trump to "get control of government".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cnvqe3le3z4o

So it is clear -- from the mouth of Goebbels 2.0 himself -- that Trump intends to use this process to reshape the political slant of federal government.

Any "it's purely about the cost" argument is dead in the water. There will be recasting of roles as political, there will be loyalty pledges, there will be litmus tests.
US tech stocks steady after DeepSeek AI app shock
Did you not see American movies? I'm also from a different country, but this part of the American culture is very much front and center in its exports, IMO.
My library has one, but it's only open for 1 hour a week, which is a shame because most 3d prints take longer than that
I had the impression that gpu isn’t a good fit for ultra low latency usecases. Can you please elaborate on what sort of work hft firms do with gpu?
Yes, it’s for live TV and/or any BBC content
It doesn't matter, they won't vote to remove. Even actual treason wasn't enough last time.
He was even given a blank check for crime by the Supreme Court.
Vouched as I couldn't see any dupes but eventually found [1] [2] [3] I really don't see the motor being robust enough for anything but vehicles that will travel almost always on sealed smooth roads. Wheels end up getting a hiding and have seen plenty of cracked mag wheels over the last 30 years or so ... but on that note, I don't see it as often anymore.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42631876 (18 days ago, 39 comments)

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42698346 (14 days ago, 0 comments)

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42713324 (13 days ago, 2 comments)
Explore how the iPhone 16 Pro Max physical camera control button impacts my own habits, raises ergonomic challenges, and why I still prefer the touchscreen shutter — with insights on breaking reliance on lock screen shortcuts for capturing faster shots.
>Is there something wrong with buying services from SpaceX?

For some, the two are from two very different and far away political spectrum. They dont want each other to touch or cross path.
Not commodified as much as regulated. The personal data that banks collect is probably mandated by the government, so switching banks doesn't really change the risk someone faces. And probably a bunch of other things that would otherwise be competitive advantages for customers too. The lack of full reserve banks (or close enough too) despite what would be a reasonable level of customer demand, for example.
The Trillion-Dollar Lie: How AI Fearmongering Backfired on Silicon Valley
Earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42859877

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42859552