skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I can’t speak for most people, of course, but in my environment, which consists of above average wealthy people interested in technology and the environment - i.e., your core Tesla target audience - nobody wants to be associated with Elon Musk in any way anymore. A friend sold a Tesla to get an electric Porsche two years ago, just because of Elon.

It’s usually me who still defends his skills as a CEO, but I also would never buy a Tesla car. I actually don’t think the competition is that strong, but I can’t be associated with a guy who makes a gesture eerily similar to a Heil Hitler at Trumps inauguration. No car can be that nice.

Edit: I’m from Munich, BMW hometown, live in Stockholm and have many friends in London. Interestingly I felt his reputation in my London circles fell even before it did in Germany and Sweden.
> Doesn't feel like a Tesla-specific issue to me.

It is a Tesla-specific issue: "...With a share of nearly 10 percent of all EV registrations, Tesla dropped to third place in Germany in 2024, after already ceding its pole position in 2022. Total EV registrations fell 27 percent to 381,000, a development that was partly driven by the end of e-car purchase premiums in late 2023.

However, some carmakers bucked the downward trend: Germany’s BMW overtook Telsa by registering just over 40,000 cars and claiming a market share of over 11 percent. Swedish brand Volvo also greatly increased its registrations, although at a lower total volume of only about 14,000 registrations. Germany’s largest car company VW defended its leading position in the country’s EV market with roughly 62,000 registrations and a market share of over 16 percent..."
It's multiple factors I believe, aside from this one here's some more:

- German EV government subsidies were reduced considerably (possibly removed?) in Dec 2023

- Other manufacturers are catching up to Tesla in many areas.
> Whatever you buy, you buy a part of lifestyle and self definition

And people on average have their car for 10 years.

It's not hard to see why people would not want to take the risk on such a big decision.
It's not just about whether competitors can improve on OpenAI's models. It's about whether they can continually create reasonable substitutes for orders of magnitude less investment.
> This is also why you reportedly could aim at a light bulb and never miss.

Except IIRC you couldn't because it displayed a fully black screen then a square, and detected a signal edge that must happen within those few frames, or some other implementation to that effect.

A lightbulb being constant would not work.

LCDs would work but they introduce latency that CRTs did not have, enough so that the check can fail. Even worse if game is emulated. Also I wonder about LCD backlight.

EDIT: confirmed by eykanal's link nearby.
AI crosses 'red line' after learning to replicate itself
I tried using it less, but it's not helping much :/
Space key also works, so you can have one hand tapping enter and space along with the other rolling the mouse key.
Hosting DeepSeek-R1 on Amazon EKS
I was looking for a fire standard; there's a particular fire standard, BS 5824, that I don't have that is referenced on a manufacturers website, which they claim relates to fire curtains. For context, yesterday as an experiment, I asked Deepseek to summarise BS 5839 part 6, a standard I know quite well, and it did a pretty good job. Let's ask Deepseek to summarise BS 5824...

"*BS 5824:2013* is a British Standard titled "Wall and floor tiling – Design and installation of ceramic, natural stone, and mosaic tiling in normal conditions – Code of practice". It provides guidelines for the *design, materials, installation, and testing* of tiling systems in interior and exterior applications..."

What? OK let's check the standard on the website of the actual body that publishes them: BSIgroup.com

"BS 5824:1980
Specification for low voltage switchgear and controlgear for industrial use. Mounting rails. C-profile and accessories for the mounting of equipment... Cost £149"

Oh shit the manufacturer's website is completely wrong and so is AI. They literally have no clue what they are talking about. 1. Let's not specify their fire curtains in my building. 2. Don't trust the AI.

My conclusion: If the info you need to do your job is behind a paywall or only in expensive textbooks, then AI hasn't seen it and it will make something up that's probably wrong, and probably don't get it to write your website or you will look like an idiot...
> they are frequently made by high school students, and I'm not aware of any deaths.

That's been done no more than a few dozen times I think? Maybe less than that. I think it's a rare enough activity that the accident rate simply hasn't been probed enough.

Wood burning with microwave transformers is notorious for getting people killed, but how many people does it kill relative to how many people have tried it? Maybe a handful few out of a hundred? On the other hand, kids building fusors are probably smarter than the average public, to whom wood burning with transformers is frighteningly accessible. I don't think teenagers building fusors is quite that dangerous, but I don't think we have enough data to call it a statistically safe activity.
Guys, there is no Tax benefit / Umweltbonus in Germany anymore, and EV sales also plummeted as hell in the country.

People just want to buy whichever is the best price/quality EV out there, they dont care who or what the CEO says most of the time.

This is not politics, is economics.
The seal has nothing to do with repairing it.
The concept of integration is also a joke. 99.99% of people that grew up south of the 50th parallel north cannot and do not want to integrate to swedish society.

The same way 99.99% of swedes cannot and do not want to integrate to a southern country.
Show HN: Slipbox – On-Device Transcription for Meetings, Podcasts and Videos
This is a great resource for self-learning mathematics: https://www.susanrigetti.com/math
Yay free proteins!
Rust's Worst Feature
This is cool. Keep up the good work and enjoy tinkering!
> That's like saying "we don't need teachers because we've got books".

I respectfully disagree. I don't think it's wrong or useless to get an LLM to help, I recently did a similar project myself (even though I manually fact-checked all the high-voltage stuff).

If you find a guide that explains too much then you can skip the parts you know. If it doesn't explain something you don't know yet then you recursively look that stuff up. It doesn't matter if it's a book or a teacher or a search engine or an LLM.

It's just not good journalism here, because evidently this project has been done lots of times in similar circumstances without LLMs.
It's not about your nose. It's about the relative differences of the air reaching the lungs when inhaled through different nose. You may not think that your nose does a very good job (or perhaps I picked a wrong example), but perhaps the job would get done much worse by a short wider nose.

Some environmental parameters are temperature and absolute humidity. But there are also significant differences in sex when a other parameters are equal. So perhaps the correlation is not so straight forward.
It’s kinda politics, as in Portugal, for instance, you can get a subsidy on pretty much any EV except for a Tesla - and it’s hard to see that as anything other than politically motivated.
I would argue the paragraph you point out is appropriately qualified, but the comment itself is NOT appropriately qualified. The reason is OP feels hopeful about this lack of trust. And OP did not say what institutions he deems untrustwordy. Is it the "institution" of slavery? (I am always confused by calling this a instituion, it's not like it's an organization and a front desk) or CDC and FEMA?

I agree, you should trust untrustwordy entities and trust trustwordy ones. It feels like a truism, but a lot of people revert to the behavior that misplaced trust is too costly and let's not trust at all because of this. Lack of trust comes with a hefty price itself. I personally feel that this leads to the unraveling of society.
This is what the internet is for!
(it's for all the other useful, valuable, life-saving stuff too)
https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-...

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B are derived from Qwen-2.5 series, which are originally licensed under Apache 2.0 License, and now finetuned with 800k samples curated with DeepSeek-R1.
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B is derived from Llama3.1-8B-Base and is originally licensed under llama3.1 license.
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B is derived from Llama3.3-70B-Instruct and is originally licensed under llama3.3 license.
Nowe Ateny
https://www.mathacademy.com/ is probably the most popular HN response.

It's expensive at $50 per month, but it seems highly thought of if you look at Algolia (https://hn.algolia.com/?q=math+academy).

I haven't used it myself, but I am evaluating it for my kids to use.

It's too early to give feedback on that front, though.
An AI-powered dev tool? I expect to see this in the next YC batch
An asteroid that size doesn't cause a very far reaching tsunami.
And if you really need to, don't anyway.
Perforator – Open-source tool for cluster-wide continuous profiling
Repo: https://github.com/yandex/perforator

We use this for GWP-style[0] continous-profiling over O(10k) nodes.

It does sampling through an eBPF program in the kernel, and supports generating a bunch of different output formats (classical flamegraphs, but also things like PGO profiles). One example where we use it daily is flamegraph diffs for prestable releases of services.

It's also worth mentioning that while the Github repo has an example for a Kubernetes setup, this isn't a Kubernetes-specific tool. We don't actually run Kubernetes ourselves. It works wherever (well, if you have Linux, that is!)

(bias note: I work at Yandex, but not in the Perforator team)

[0]: https://research.google/pubs/google-wide-profiling-a-continu...
If you're saying that it's the uncertainty in the initial measurement, then we're in agreement. If the initial measurement were perfect, the only source of error would be the finite timestep. N-body simulation itself is deterministic, and so the only source of randomness is our uncertainty about the object's true mass, size, shape, position, velocity, etc.
Ezgif.com, a simple, free online toolset for basic animated editing
> How can better air lead to higher numbers of successful offspring or fatalities?

Try running XX hours after an antelope and report back, most animals aren't optimised for long distance, humans are, you can hunt most things by following them and waiting for them to collapse, surely having better air intake helps. It might be something as dumb as more antelope meat = more social points = you get to bang more.

Why do 70%+ of the world population has brown eyes ? It offer marginal UV resistance but nobody becomes blind or sterile because they have blue eyes, certainly not before they can reproduce. Chances of reproduction can also be dictated by other things like attractiveness, and these are also very dependant on cultures and time periods.
Suitably roasted, thanks for the laugh!
Yes, for people who look into the research Deepseek released, there are a good number of novelties which enabled much cheaper R&D. For example, improvements to Mixture of Experts modules and Multi-head Latent Attention. If you have infinite money, you don’t need to innovate there, but DeepSeek didn’t.
Khan Academy until Calculus is perfect to recover the foundations
Through most of my life, I believed that I was utterly incapable of doing math and mostly just kind got by in high school, didn't really think I would need it that much. Then I took a reality check the first time I attempted the equivalent of my country's SAT test. At the time, I got in my head that I wanted to be a computer engineer and that required at least above average grades in math and physics so that I could have a chance.
There really isn't much I can offer in advice, besides: diligent study. That was what got me by. Sitting my ass at the desk everyday for hours on end, starting from first principles (and I mean first principles, like basic arithmetic first principles) and doing as many practice problems as I could. I probably did too many of them, but getting them right was the only thing that brought me any confidence that I was learning. I did that for about a year and, while it didn't turn me from math illiterate to math genius, it gave me enough of a foundation to get into college and have a easier time than my peers on subjects like calculus.
In your case, you can take a lighter approach, since it isn't urgent by any means, and you probably won't have as much time as I did. I recommend setting a time whenever you can to study, ideally it would be around two hours, but I find it more important be consistent about it. If you are anything like I was, you may have some knowledge on math, but its akin to Swiss cheese: full of holes. That being the case, start from the earliest point it makes sense to you. I was very paranoid at the time, so I started from basic arithmetic and, although that may not have been necessary, starting from scratch gave me the confidence that I wasn't missing anything going forward. Mathematics is a cohesive structure, where the higher elements are build upon the lower foundations, you cannot get very far without having a good grasp on the basics. As to learning resources, there are many online for free (Khan Academy[1], Paul's Math Notes[2], many introductory books at the Open Textbook Library[3])

Lastly, try to have fun with it. Back when I started the journey, I was to focused on what I could get from learning math (that is, getting into college and then, hopefully, a job), that took out of the experience a bit and the only thing that kept me going, though I didn't recognize at the time, was the joy of learning something that I believed my whole life to be unapproachable, at least by me. So be patient, if you bang your head enough times against this wall, I can attest that it eventually starts to show cracks.

Good luck on your learning journey.

--

[1] https://www.khanacademy.org/
[2] https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/
[3] https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/subjects
For pluggable power there are some other considerations you shouldn't neglect, like accidentally building a decent-ish-Q series LC with the input capacitors: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/appl...

USB-C sorta solves this because it starts at 5 V and steps up after being plugged in, but then you have issues with arcing on unplugging (see: USB-C connector spec, one of the last appendices deals with this).
Disagree. Teslas used to be the car of choice for your average Green party voter. It’s the voter class that can afford this car. Elon is a persona non grata in these circles, and the alt right (on average) can’t afford this type or car.
Andean Indians are known for fairly wide, prominent noses. They also have massive thoraxes and lung capacity.
On the road, you have to go the speed limit whether you're in a rolls or a lambo. You might prefer a lambo if it could get there twice as fast
Should be submitted here: https://theuselessweb.com/
were these "dev" domains holding real production data? the blog post does not clear it for me.
I think we seek to credit the source for reasons that are not clear. Do you feel any which way if I suggest to you your carrot soup only tastes good because of the carrots you put in it?
With the follow up question being, why don’t you admit you put carrots in it?

We don’t really do this because there’s no concept of ownership of food to that degree. Maybe 200 years ago, where a farmer may chew you out since he toiled the soil to get you that carrot.

So, for us to not be possessive of knowledge, we’d need to evolve. It’s not likely in our lifetime, but perhaps 500-1000 years down the line the social fabric will evolve to handle this, similar to food possession.

Or I could be wrong, and we just have a bunch of naturally thieving crooks all over the place.
In terms of the general topic of asteroid impact and risk, here is a highly informative reference.

https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/pd/cs/pdc25/ImpactRiskIntro-ATAP-...
This is sad. Especially when you incorporate a personal donation feature, very sad.

Edit: This is what the actual post should've been. Here is HN post for the actual script itself https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40156330
JavaScript Temporal is coming
There are so many relatively popular youtube channels making 10 to 20 minute videos about interesting subjects which say nothing more than the Wikipedia page for that topic. Whole channels, well liked by the algorithm, built off paraphrasing Wikipedia without citing it.

Being generous to them, some of them do a good job of picking topics I wouldn't have thought to look up myself. They probably do spend a lot of time reading through diverse subjects looking for the interesting ones.
Not politics, as I suspect you are probably aware.

In Portugal, electric vehicle (EV) subsidies are available for new battery electric vehicles (BEVs) priced up to €62,500, including VAT. This means that higher-priced models, such as Tesla vehicles, do not qualify for these incentives.

The primary reason for this price cap is to ensure that public funds are used to make EVs more accessible to a broader segment of the population, rather than subsidizing luxury vehicles.

https://blog.wallbox.com/portugal-ev-incentives/
it is based on text not the model, online services in China all have to comply with censorship, this is the reason why Google left, typically there is a list of words to be detected, any content contains these words will be censored. It gets updated regularly.
i got 16ms on mobile by laying it flat on my desk and spamming with both index fingers
How many people live in Britain? We do not know
What about tools like LibreOffice Base and KDEs Kexi?
That is not what the press thinks:

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/is-europe-about-to-switc...

"The Danish energy agency says it approved the repairs because it is ‘obliged under international law to permit the establishment and operation of pipeline facilities on the Danish continental shelf’. The proposed works will, according to the agency, involve installing specially designed waterproof caps on the two blown-up pipes of Nord Stream-1 and one of the pipes of Nord Stream-2. That will allow the flooded pipelines to be pumped dry and – potentially – raised from the 90-meter-deep seabed and repaired. The cost of the patch has been estimated at €622 million (£521 million), according to Nord Stream 2 AG’s administrative receiver, the Swiss-based Transliq AG."

Moreover, if it really had nothing to do with repairing it the permission could have been given a long time ago, right?
Don’t know why this is being downvoted. I really wanted to get a BMW. The total price itself was no issue for me at all, but I just couldn’t justify paying a premium for a car that in parts feels bad. The software stack is horrible.

Got a Skoda instead. Its software is also horrible but at least it was a bargain.
It's expected that German brands are popular but that even Volvo gains so much ground is interesting. Is it due to the zero import tax between EU countries? Are those Volvos still even made in Sweden (or EU)? In the US, it seems like Hyundai/Kia have gained a lot of ground, along with non-Tesla US brands like Ford.
This may be more satisfactory for you: https://popcat.click/
We don't know the configutation it's in precisely. We don't know the initial conditions. Small unobservable differences will lead to large difference in outcome. That's the chaotic part.
To be honest, I was using internet as shorthand for average of human knowledge, on the basis that most books, peer reviewed articles, and everything else is already on the internet, even if they exist only in the more unsavory corners (I've seen nothing to suggest the FM producers were / are much bothered about where the data is from).

But yes referring to base models. I'm also not convinced that the average book is any more trustworthy than the average webpage, whether that be a purely technical book, where you really need to webpage of errata to be able to use the examples. Or the more pop-sci books that cherry pick data and jump to completely unfounded conclusions (I'm thinking of the ancient engineers - aliens built the pyramids books).

The feedback is great and might work in some areas, technical knowledge. But once you step outside of the physical sciences and engineering, you don't so much end up with better quality information, just a curated experience that aligns with the model owners (think DeepSeek and Tiananmen square)
I'm impressed by your, and their, hearing comprehension here! Granted, English isn't my native language but even with concentration I struggle to hear what they say.
Haven't tried this myself yet, but came across this while sorting my Obsidian inbox: https://pico.sh/pgs

Basically you can ssh/scp/rsync static pages there.

The only personal thing you provide is an SSH public key pair.
Apologies for the unrelated comment, but as someone with origins in Belarus, I find it absolutely gutting and disheartening when people see the country’s name (in this case, on a chart), overlook it, and lump it together with some generalized notion of “Ukraine and Russia.” These are three distinct cultures, three separate nations. Sorry, I have no intention of sparking a debate or political argument, just expressing the exasperation.
Wouldn’t blowing it up into smaller pieces reduce the overall risk by having more of the bolide’s original mass consumed in the atmosphere?
All ICEs are Rube Goldberg machines, especially the high-performance brands. It's a miracle of engineering that they run at all.
I'd say custom is fairly common for AAA studios still as they have the manpower to do it.
Not if the process doesn't take long, so the most the user (or consuming service) sees is a slower response than usual. That I would class as a temporary performance degradation. If the degradation is significant it might still not be acceptable, of course, but I'd not call it downtime.
Google reclassifies U.S. as 'sensitive country' alongside China, Russia
It would be helpful to explain which behavior you seek. Not everyone has MacOS, and even less have MacOS with DE ISO-layout, in case this layout is doing something more special than the normal ISO-layout.
The Failed Tester
“Resurgence” not “resurgance”. I wanted to leave a comment in the article itself but it wants me to sign in with GitHub, which: yuk, so I’m commenting here instead.
Authorization is derived from authentication; authentication is the core concept underpinning security, while authorization is about defining the scope of the access.

Restricting the scope is mostly useful for when you need to interact with services that talk to other underlying services without granting them full access to those, but in practice, that's not a very common case outside of the web.

Ultimately that distinction doesn't really matter, what's important at the end of the day is how you implement the access control. Using an opaque token and an introspection endpoint is a terrible idea. JWT is a good solution. All of the OAuth flows do is just provide convoluted ways for the user to authenticate with a identity provider, generating a JWT on his behalf, and do not contribute to security in any meaningful way.
Apology: It is paywalled but at least the 'free bit' of text we can read underlines the point.
How DeepSeek approaches a trivial code conversion
>First you must invent the universe.

That was the easy part though, figuring out how to handle all the unintended side effects it generated is still an ongoing process. Please sit and relax while we are solving the few incidentals events occurring here and there, rest assured we are putting our best effort to their resolution.