skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's how I see it. As a developer, you still used 32-bit math operations in assembly and the CPU executed them as a series of 16-bit ops. The details are abstracted away. IMO, that made it 32 bits.

By analogy, SATA is a serial protocol, but you wouldn't ordinarily refer to it as a 1-bit bus.
Unsloth is the one I personally hear the most about
I've always wished for a "git trisect", or a "git n-sect" in general, that can try multiple commits in parallel. The use case would be for testing changes in software that has a long, single-threaded component in the build process (e.g., a heavily overloaded configure script). For long-running projects where each bisect takes over a dozen steps, those components lead to lots of thumb-twiddling.
:) At the rate we're using up names for AI-assistants that we bolt onto every darn thing, I'm sure we'll get down to a "CrikeyAI" offered by some B-tier SaaS company very shortly.
"FAA Got Rid of Its Leader Before D.C. Plane Crash—Thanks to Elon Musk":

* https://newrepublic.com/post/190942/faa-no-leader-dc-plane-c...

"FAA Administrator Quit on Jan. 20 After Elon Musk Told Him to Resign":

* https://www.thedailybeast.com/faa-chief-michael-whitaker-qui...

"The FAA is facing a major crisis without a leader because Elon Musk pushed him out*

* https://www.theverge.com/news/603113/faa-chief-musk-dc-plane...
The tricky thing with git bisect run is that you usually have to have your test script not be part of your git checkout for the process to work.

This is because of the particular situation that bisect is valuable in; you find a regression that doesn’t have a test, and you aren’t sure when it was committed.

First, it has to be a regression; if it is just a bug, then there was no previous version that didn’t have the bug, it just hadn’t been found until now. It has to be something that worked before and now doesn’t.

Second, it has to not have had a test before the regression was found. If you had a test for it already, it would have been found by CI as soon as it was committed, and you wouldn’t need to figure out which commit broke it.

So if you try to add a test to the normal test suite of the code and commit it, git bisect run is not going to work; as soon as you check out the older code, your new test won’t be there and the tests will pass because your new test of the breakage doesn’t run. You have to have the new test persist across git checkouts. This is not trivial, because you can’t just exclude your test files from being updated by git bisect, since other tests will also be changing through versions. You need to have your tests always include some non-version controlled file, and you need to have added that include PRIOR to your last known good version.

The only other use case would be if you are making a lot of commits without running tests, so you actually could break a pre-existing test and not know which commit broke it. If that is your situation, you should probably change your workflow to test every commit instead of trying to get git bisect to work.

For these reasons, I have never found ‘git bisect run’ to be as valuable as it seemed when I first learned about it.
Ah - this works for video, unlike Airfoil.
On your note about capacitor sizes — at my first EE job, my boss taught me about capacitance-voltage derating[0] for ceramic capacitors and it was quite the revelation. There is a significant inverse relationship between the two, which no one tells you about in college!

I'm now very careful to pick ceramic capacitors with enough headroom on their rated voltage as you lose a lot if you're close to the rated value. This curve is dependent on the different ceramic types as well (C0G, X7R, etc). Cheaper ceramics have a steeper rolloff.

For personal projects I am very careful to pick higher quality ceramics (X7R if I can) and use caps rated to 2-3x my operating voltage. Likely overkill, but I'm not optimizing for cost at volume.

[0] https://resources.altium.com/p/voltage-derating-ceramic-capa...
Of course you can exclude them, to determine whether the aircraft themselves are a viable commercial proposition for the people who bought them (the airlines) -- which they were, just as other aircraft such as the A380 today are. The people who bought A380s are happy, and will be using them for decades. Emirates would still like to buy more (and may end up buying used ones from less successful airlines)

The fact that the aircraft manufacturer spent far too much on development relative to the sales they made is of course important to the manufacturer -- or at least to whoever is financing the manufacturer, but that is a DIFFERENT question. In fact more than one question.

There is the question of whether the price they were sold to airlines for was greater or less than the incremental cost to build one aircraft. If the price was greater than the cost then there was some hope for a successful program, and they simply overspent on development and/or didn't sell enough copies.

If they were sold to airlines for less than the marginal cost then it's just an all-around manufacturing screwup that could never be solved by any amount of sales.
Gemini 1.5 pro is extremely impressive at reading 2 million tokens of a document and answering questions about it. And at least for the time being it's offered for free on AI studio.
So you mean something like, "what if the baseline, off-the-cuff response for the next-gen models was tuned based on the results of the reasoning model excluding the reasoning itself?"
I don't understand the joke.
Looks as though they offer “Perpetual” for 99.00
That's what the build up of plastics in our testicles are for.
There's too many of those, you'll never stand out from the crowd. Instead, you could make a channel where you react/review to specifically asteroid impact related books and media. It could be very low effort, but topical enough to gain traction as people search and watch other asteroid videos.
I believe it's understood that OnlyOffice devs are (mostly) Russian.
And that in todays world Russian software companies have to go through hoops to be able to send/receive invoices/contracts/etc.

Some parts of their portfolio are not FOSS, these are the components in the commercial edition (the hosted/embeddable version of onlyoffice).

I have customers running OnlyOffice and we've never seen anything suspicious in our security tooling.

So I believe it comes down to your opinion/mindset around the whole Russia thing.
What do any of those quotes have to do with fascism?
No, virtio presents to the network stack the same way other devices do.
There's also no evidence they have the money to pay if the offers were in good faith. Combined with the fact the two people who came up with the idea have a history of deciding not to pay and instead go to the courts to avoid paying
The Netherlands was rather unique back then for not having any starvation or food riots. Lots of dairy products and fish.
> If I said I don’t like Truth Social. But I’m always on it, what does that tell you?

Let's not play that game anymore. Be clear. What do you think that's supposed to tell me? Flip your question around: If I said I don’t like Truth Social. But I’m always on it, what conclusion would you infer from that?
That is Great. I like this.
I was hoping someone would post that (^_^)
Do you get scared when you find yourself believing? Because I was never spiritual like this either until somewhat later in life.

There’s a real element of “holy shit I believe in God”. I never thought I would.

It is very new for me to accept that we were probably always here, and probably always be, in various forms.
It strikes me that if you aren’t advanced enough for this then you probably aren’t advanced enough to safely manage your password manager locally. If you don’t have a good understanding of things like DNS, do you understand the vulnerabilities you need to mitigate for in a self-hosted situation? I don’t self-host, even though I could get it working and I self-host plenty of other things, because I’m not a security expert and I think it is more likely I would put my password manager at greater risk than Bitwarden.
By all the 'no one under 6'2"' tinder jokes I'd say it's being incorporated into genetics.
It's not RL, but you can get a long way with a thorough system prompt to encourage it to engage in 'thinking' behavior on its own without extra training. Just playing with it myself now with promising results - Mistral Small seems very receptive to this approach (not all models are - cough, Llama).

Update: This is such a prompt: https://gist.github.com/peterc/955d797ee35b3c777d76a2d881d2f...
Sure you can hook into Wordpress’ hooks with either:

- `add_action(‘template_redirect’, ‘my_scramble_func’)`

- or `add_filter(‘the_content’, ‘my_scramble_func’)`

Wordpress is PHP so you get the power of doing whatever as the request loads.

`Template_redirect` would allow you to redirect to a specific template/page.

`the_content` would allow you to return different content for that path.

Then you just need to check the user-agent/IP. I’m sure there’s a PHP library you could install with composer to do this.

What would be fun in my opinion is leaving the metadata the same but replacing only the meat. For example article titled “How to Update Your Blog” would still have the title and headings, but then return “<h2>Step one: open your blog editor</h2><p>hajfineidif hahahe lorem ipsum…</p>” for the paragraphs.
...why wouldn't it be a play on the INTP type?
It's hardly a joke at all. Even the very best models tend to be awful at writing jokes.

I find the addition of an explanation at the end (never a sign of a good joke) amusing at the meta-level:

Why did the badger bring a puffin to the party?

Because he heard puffins make great party 'Puffins'!

(That's a play on the word "puffins" and the phrase "party people.")
this writing posted today by the Vatican shows modern scholarship and it appears, humility with respect to past Church attitudes about tech. Since just about everyone agrees that terrible mistakes were made in the distant past, and this writing shows active learning about how to approach new situations, the parent comment seems like immature and illogical mud-slinging, bringing up six hundred years old failures that are news to almost no one.
ZDI is more like a bug bounty than a grey market broker.
What was the average THC content when you were a teenager?
Rapidus Reportedly to Install 10 EUV Machines, Aiming for Early Mass Production
I was very confused why Mozilla was shilling for temporal.io
"Trump blames diversity rules under his predecessors, saying he believes people were hired for air traffic control roles who were not qualified - but offers no evidence for this"

From the BBC. I swear to god they made 4chan president of America.
Yes; and furthermore LLVM also has undef, which is sort of a trap representation, but it only exists in the optimizer. (There's also poison for overflow, which is a strictly less defined value than undef.)

I suspect even reading an array of uninitialized u8s would cause havoc just from LLVM miscompiles alone.
There's also a 22b model that I appreciate, since it _almost_ fits into my 12GB 3060. But, alas, I might need to get a new GPU if this trend of fatter smaller models continues.
Same deal, two beams shooting out the top and bottom of their orbit.

https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/560
As other respondents to this wapo comment argue, dropping endorsement could be seen as net better. Can be argued a number of ways.

However, I think it's worth pointing out what goes on at root: distrust and/or seeing oneself as having being manipulated.

On this fulcrum the actual details, facts, intent etc is rendered irrelevant: if I feel the fool telling me 2+2=4 (a fact) will to me become more evidence of bs.

The only way out in the current environment is to not get caught up emotionally in non falsafible stories, stick to facts, and regard anything from news that's not communicating data, facts as entertainment.

Opinion makers are entertainment.
Why this simple ring was so difficult to make [video]
I only have a passing interest in this, but DCA's approach is tricky, the airspace is complex and restricted, and then you mix in military pilots doing VIP helicopter training runs across the approach. The procedures make it safe-ish, but it's riskier than other major airports.
Running the Q4 quant (14GB or so in size) at 46 tok/sec on a 3090 Ti right now if anyone's curious to performance. Want the headroom to try and max out the context.
I've played with them yeah.
On "Truth Social" last night, Donald Trump was explicitly questioning the actions of the ATC. And during this morning's press briefing, he blamed
"the crash on Barack Obama, Joe Biden, former Transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg, DEI and people with disabilities." I'm waiting for the transcript on that one.
> It's the absence of belief in a deity - and therefore the recognition that the starting conditions of our lives was random chance, out of our control - that provides the foundation that all humans are equal and of equal value.

This is absolutely false if by "equal value" you mean anything other than "of no more value than any other product of randomness". But I doubt you believe that you and the drug addict in Eastern Europe are equally worthless (and equivalent to the return value of `head -c 100 /dev/urandom`). In fact, you say "the realization that life is ... precious". "Precious" to who, precisely?

> It's the absence of belief in a deity that neatly solves the problem of evil in the world

This is the same failing as above - it solves the problem of evil by removing evil as a category. There is only the actions of random chance, which cannot be evil. But you clearly still believe in evil. Where comes the good that evil opposes?
I think of "social" media as a fundamentally isolating experience.

On modern social media platforms, each person gets their own, personalized feed.

As their feed becomes more personalized, it gets more and more isolated from a common, shared cultural context.

According to Wilbur Schramm's theories of communication, human to human messages must occur over a shared cultural context, and social media shrinks that shared cultural context.

LLMs as a platform could shrink this shared cultural context even more, unless we become more deliberate about fighting back against this "shared experience" shrinking:

https://www.makeartwithpython.com/blog/social-media-is-the-f...
Unseen Catalyst: A Simple Rollout Caused a Kubernetes Outage
One thing that helps me write is to picture someone I know who I'm talking to. This helps me to include the appropriate level of context, and it also impacts the "voice" I will use. I think the author basically mentions this as one of the their list items.
You are very wrong w.r. to communist block. Women's participation in medicine (and other intellectual professions) was generally high, possibly higher than in the west.
This makes sense. If I live in a country with hyperinflation, I'd want to have my money in a more stable currency like the USD.

Congrats on the launch. I wanted to note that I'm using mobile safari on an iPhone Pro 15 and the header text collides with the tagline to the point that it's illegible.
No, LSPs. Language servers is a pretty well-defined term.
And we don't need IDEs to develop software, yet IDEs are the way, sometimes only way, for some people to develop good software.
> You mentioned America as an examplar of demcracy further up, while in truth it is an extremely flawed model of democracy

I disagree with your framing, as does your source. The index you shared does not paint America as "extremely flawed", but just flawed (and even so, almost at the score of getting their highest rank). So adding the word "extremely" is your editorial take. However, their rating system is not transparent - it's not clear who they surveyed or what questions they asked. It's also clear this rating system is only somewhat correct in scoring countries - for example both Canada and Australia are democracies but have notable restrictions on free speech, a core principle of a free society and any democracy - but they were ranked higher than the US.

> Anyone can be labelled a terrorist.

Labels can be misused, but what actually happened? Has Israel been shooting rockets indiscriminately into Gaza? No, but people in Gaza have been doing that for a few decades now. In fact, the rocket attacks got a lot worse after Israel left Gaza in 2005. Is that not terrorism?

> It is Israels fault if they kill civilians

How can it be when they're pursuing terrorists who choose to use human shields on purpose? Israel has been careful to announce targets ahead of time and has gone above and beyond what any other country would to avoid civilian casualties. But in this situation, which was created by Hamas and their supporters, a country that wishes to protect itself from attacks can't achieve zero civilian deaths. That's unrealistic for any conflict, but especially this one.
Congratulations on the launch.

My question is that how will you deal with future government regulations. In developing world, the government does not like crypto and may impose laws like upfront taxation to discourage people from investing.
Well, it was a bubble. There was a major burst in the turn of the century that proved it, with many consequences.

A bubble just meant that the valuation of internet companies at the time were overinflated and detached from reality, not that the Internet as a technology was useless.

I think comparing AI to the internet in terms of usefulness is absolute wishful thinking thinking. The Internet was a major inflection point in the history of the world, maybe in the same magnitude of the advent of computers or the industrial revolution.

AI (and we should be clear that we are actually talking about Generative AI in this context) is an interesting tech, may be pretty useful in some contexts, but it is not in the same league of the previous examples.
Apparently "party puffin" is a company that sells cheap party supplies and decorations. That's all that I can think of.
What was the average THC content when you were a teen?
Firefox Blocks 0.0.0.0 IP Addresses
It is increasingly difficult to even discuss what is called AI because of the enormous hype around it. I almost added the word "stupid" before the hype, but the problem is that it is now impossible to distinguish between CGS (Corporate Greed Stupidity) about AI and AI. The noise factor is astonishing. And certainly AI is a marketing term.
I believe we need another word to replace AI. And ABNECUI is certainly a contender. But really what we are talking about is Neural Network Models. So Let s just talk about NNM or if we must, how about NNI?

And since there is no money to be made on it, certainly in all the hype, we may be overlooking other kinds of I that are right in front of our noses? CI, HI, GI whatever you want to call it.

[edit for dedup]
> Is there evidence more baking won't happen?

No, actually there is a lot of evidence that it will still be worked on.

Normally I would just say look at the issue linked in the nightly docs but due to an overlap of tacking PR and moving it from std to core PR it's not supper useful.

Tracking Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/78485

If the author has constructive critique they should probably mention it there (after skimming through the discussion to make sure this wasn't already considered and not done due to subtleties they overlooked in the blog post (like e.g. that it's a standard/core feature which has to work across all targets and as such can't rely on anything being initialized to 0 by the OS, or that depending on the global allocator used you definitely can't rely on things being zeroed even if the OS only hands out zeroed memory, etc. etc.))
If you are arguing reading books is the only way someone can learn about a topic I disagree.
> The whole point of test-mode is that you can run your transaction as if it was running on the live-mode network. The solution is to test in test mode. Live mode just runs real cards, it should be have identically to test mode.

This is unreasonable. Test environment is never the same as prod. It's irresponsible to anyone you're actually accepting money from not to try the E2E flow in production.

Even if card processing is identical, who is say everything else in your flow is? It's either going to be you or a stranger on the internet being the first to try it for real.
Some people call them Elder Millennials.

http://www.threepanelsoul.com/comic/boomer-shooters
Show HN: Pocket Log, macOS app, transcribe your audio log into visual a timeline [video]
Pocket Log is a macOS app that transcribes audio files from a USB dictaphone or Apple Voice Memos into a visual timeline.
I'd add: make it super clear that you are not going to asking them for a job or a referral or selling them anything during the conversation. That will increase the likelihood they'll take the call.

If you can get a warm intro to them, all the better.
was that "medium is the message" (or massage) ?

by Marshall McLuhan, as noted here:

https://zandercutt.com/2018/07/16/the-cosmetic-class/
That's a huge topic. The short answer is that you can't control the output of the LLM. The idea of RAG is that, by inspecting the output of the LLM, you can use it to trigger tools ("tool calling") that pull supposedly-correct data from the real world (like a database). That code which is not based on a model but is traditional programming code in a normal language, must be the arbiter of what is allowed in and out. The LLM is always statistical in output and never fully reliable or controllable.

A banking application is a good example. You might have a chatbox that allowed the customer to write "Transfer $1M by Zelle to Linda Smith." The LLM would probably return the correct tool, but your actual app would not transfer funds you don't have, thus providing the "safety."
The developing world governments lack the resources to impose and execute laws successfully against crypto (or any other area).
Apparently around 1 in 3 Americans, according to this Monmouth Poll from last year: https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/monmouthp...

"About 1 in 3 (32%) think that illegal immigrants are more likely than other Americans to commit violent crimes like rape or murder. This marks an increase in this view from prior polls (21% in 2019 and 17% in 2015)."
So your only use for stablecoins is to avoid regulation so you can kind of look like a bank but without any proper regulation/security just with lots of more potential issues (looking forward to find you on https://www.web3isgoinggreat.com/ ) while the poor users should know as little as possible (abstracted away) that they actually do not have dollars but just IOUs from some random startup?
Just a side note: I hoped AirPlay was stable after so many years, but everyone may already know that AirPlay 2 is a change that at least in my use case, made all my old Macs running older macOS and AirPlay 1 incompatible with newer third party hardware and hardware that updated firmware to AirPlay 2. Yes, I'm talking about iTunes! At least all my Airport Expresses still work fine! lol
DeepSeek R1 is far better than OpenAI o1 at finding bugs in pull requests
> The AI chip startup will deploy a 70-billion-parameter version of DeepSeek-R1

Saved you a click, this is not the full model.