skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Who said anything about a study? No study is needed to see that you obviously don’t understand what revealed preference means, you are contradicting the definition of the economic term.

Take your question. The reason someone might do something different from what they said could be due to anything, such as constraints like cost, time, or availability. It could be due to changing circumstances, or someone else’s preferences. Any given answer to your question cannot be used to infer anything about preference, and assuming it does means you’re not thinking scientifically.

Revealed preference theory is trying to demonstrate what can be proven about preference, which is why it requires a situation where someone spends money on a mutually exclusive choice between two things that are close enough to be an apples to apples comparison. If you don’t do that, then you’re fooling yourself about what the data means.
> I have a hard time wrapping my head around exactly what it is that Christians believe about immortality

From the Christian perspective immortality is less limited than mortality. In mortality people are limited by the physical limitations of their bodies, thinking capacity, and the worldly environment in which they operate. Beyond that Christians cannot precisely describe immortality because knowledge and/or memories of that, or anything else, do not accompany the soul into the mortal world. All Christians can know is a limited set of opportunities described in religious scripture. Everything else in mortality descends from agency and accountability.
Guess there’s no Delete Act for state databases
Creating a AI Replica of Myself for My Son to Communicate with After I'm Gone
Now in College, Luddite Teens Still Don't Want Your Likes
Jailbroken: Finding 50,000 Legal Hallucinations in GPT-4o with RL
Localhost: Nolen Royalty's One Million Checkboxes [video]
And apparently Trump included dwarfism in his DEI blame-game. Where the hell did that come from? Are little people eating the cats and dogs now, too?

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5116332-trump-0f...
There's no reason not to allow them. You might legitimately prohibit them if unsleeved, but in sleeves there's no difference. Tournaments that aren't run by WotC do allow proxies, though I think Star City Games limits you to 5 proxies, which isn't enough to solve any budget problems. Again, obviously, there's no reason as far as gameplay goes. SCG does traffic in used cards.
It's cool that printers have this technology, but the flip side is that it actually makes the printers worse at being printers for doing prints.
This document is a relatively minor publication from a dicastery. These days, you can generally expect Latin editions will be produced for major documents such as papal encyclicals, and may only become available when the document is prepared, after its initial publication, for inclusion in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis.
Nobody is copying their model parameters or inference code.

What people “suck out” of their API are the general ideas. And they do it specifically so they can reassemble them in their own way.

It’s like reading all the Jack Reacher novels and then creating your own hero living through similar situations, but with a different name.

You’ll read it and you’ll say, dang, that situation/metaphor/expression/character reminds me of that Reacher novel. But there’s nothing Lee Child can do about it.

And that’s perfectly fine. Because he himself took many of his ideas from others, like Le Carré.

It’s the Eternal Tao.
No religious flamewar, please.
I would expect a timezonechange event to get emitted on the window and that the developer would be responsible for handling it accordingly. This wouldn't require any changes to Temporal.
What a homie. Judging from their profile picture they are also a fan of "The Untalkative Bunny". What a nice person.
Where is the line between a minimally-researched article, and paid advertising?

> Private security firms have been around for decades, of course, especially in L.A.

Vs. Wikipedia: "Pinkerton is an American private investigation and security company established around 1850 in the United States by Scottish-born American cooper Allan Pinkerton and Chicago attorney Edward Rucker as the North-Western Police Agency, which later became [...] At the height of its power from the 1870s to the 1890s, it was the largest private law enforcement organization in the world."
I don't know how it's opposite. There's some complex guesstimating on where an asteroid will hit. We roughly know its size. We roughly know its composition. We roughly know its speed. We can give a +/- range where the impact area will be. That's not any different than how hurricane spaghetti models do.
> So the soul lives on forever, but without the reasoning and intellectual capabilities granted by the corporeal form?

:boom: You've found it! The disassociation of soul and body are the problem that pre-Catholic thinkers ran into over and over again. The soul must be immortal, but it relies on the body for the sensory perceptions which enable the first stages of any intellection. So what the heck happens to it after this dissolution?

This is why the resurrection is such a big deal. Not only is the soul redeemed, all of corporeal reality is redeemed. As later revealed (Revelation in particular, St. Paul's writings in several other places) the Final Judgement will include the restoration of the "whole human person", body _and_ soul.

What about the time between death and the final judgement? There is no natural bridge for our intellect to work on the beatific vision, but there is nothing stopping God from making up what is lacking (and indeed, we believe He does make up for what is lacking, so that the entire time between our particular judgement and the Final Judgement those who are in Heaven will be able to reason and remember far better than they could while on Earth).
So basically you don't know, but are being dramatic. NSA and CIA and DoD in general?

The reason i say this is you mention experience and skill but ignore whether such people are in _roles_ that need to exist at all, which is what is being questioned, not the worth of individuals in those roles.
>If that were true, it begs the question why are "all the teens" using it then?

It's an attractor. The more people who are on a social media platform, the more value you can get from joining it yourself. Thus, you're more likely to join and then you joining makes the next person to come along also more likely to join.
It's not really a misconception, this was Feuerbach's and also Nietzsche's or Stirner's criticism of Christianity. It projects human attributes on an ostensibly divine subject "othering" and worshipping them, in reality just attempting to sanctify humanity. (in Stirner's words creating Mensch (human/mankind) with a capital M". This is incredibly obvious in the psychology underpinning a lot of Christian beliefs, the Manichaean good and evil worldview, the meek inheriting the earth, the day of judgement, equality, immortality i.e. trying to escape death, and so on.
Let's continue torturing the poor car. It'd be great if it works that way, but what I fears is when the AI chauffeur decide on a route that appears to go where I want, but instead it's a dead end, and you don't know the exact intersection for the correct path. Or it take a long sinuous dirt road ignoring the highway. Or it sends me off a cliff because it assumes it's piloting a plane. To manage those risks, you have to keep your hand on the steering wheel and know the route beforehand. In this case, I would prefer a GPS map and have something that is a bit less fragile.

I don't mind writing code, and if it become boilerplatey, it's a good time to rethink those abstractions or write a few functions. And there's snippets for shorter sections.
Hey Simon - In your experience, what's the best "small" model for function/tool calling? Of the ones I've tested they seem to return the function call even when it's not needed, which requires all kinds of meta prompting & templating to weed out. Have you found a model that more or less just gets it right?
Systemic Existential Risks from Incremental AI Development
The article also mentions this is only one of many databases, and the only one that has self-reporting requirements for abuse.
Google made a cute modern implementation of the classic snake game.

It has a surprising amount of configurability that I almost missed at first glance. Pills as portals, infinite scroll, flying pills...
'Identity Check' widely rolling out to Google Pixel
As I understand it, stablecoins are three things:

1. a means of bypassing US sanctions

2. a means of bypassing the US dollar / Western order during international trade

3. a means of transacting without Visa, Mastercard, Chase; cutting out banks and fintechs and their margins.

Stablecoins are pitched to investors as #3, but are more frequently used as #1 and #2.

If stablecoins catch on and can build a large network, it poses a real threat to American hegemony. You wouldn't need the dollar for international trade or settlement. You could trade, move large balances, etc. in stablecoins and never need to hold dollar reserves.

It's wild to see the US funding and developing this tech.
To me this 'source' requirement does not make sense. It is not that you bring training data and the application together and press a train button, there's much more actions involved.

Also the training data is of a massive amount.

Additionally, what about human in the loop training, do you deliver humans as part of the source?
Is this compliant with US sanctions and AMl policies?
Yet another reason why the minimum/living wage treadmill isn't the right solution, and labor activist should push more seriously for UBI. The fact of the matter is that many people's labor isn't worth a living wage, and especially not for ethical working conditions.

The goal of every job paying enough to be comfortable is missing the forest for the trees, because it will always fail to account for the cost of the stress of working, and always be at odds with safety. The actual goal should be that people should be able to survive comfortably no matter their ability to get a "good" job, because as we automate more, it's just a simple fact that "good" jobs will continue to get harder to come by.
Can't the same countries also just make all the on-ramps and off-ramps just as illegal?
hn.algolia.com
80% accuracy.
FYI, these yellow dots are part of a Secret Service program to fight counterfeit currency. It was big news a couple decades ago and is well understood in art/printing circles. There are host of similar programs to protect printed money.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/EURion_constellation
Surprised there is no researcher dumping the SPI flash, patching some conditional jumps and doing a write-up.
Is there any frame of reference to compare this to? I.e what is the normal fluctuation/movement of that 'datasets available' number? For instance, it dropped by 18k between 9/13 and 10/13.
How does it feel, OpenAI?
A lightweight, pure Python, numpy compliant ndarray class.

https://github.com/wadetb/tinynumpy
I'm afraid I don't have a great answer for that - I haven't spent nearly enough time with function calling in these models.

I'm hoping to add function calling to my LLM library soon which will make me much better equipped to experiment here.
Point taken, I realize it's complicated stuff. My gripe with it was more that other exotic features were being implemented while this was being neglected.
The word stable doesn’t appear once in the post except for within the word stablecoin. It’s important to get past the name. It’s a pegged coin, the attempted stability is in terms of it being pegged, and people need to do their research on how well a coin achieves that just like with all of DeFi.
> Hell wasn't christian doctrine until 400CE.

"So it will be at the end of the age. The angels will come out and separate the evil from the righteous and throw them into the furnace of fire, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth."

~ Jesus of Nazareth, quoted in Matthew 13:49-50

https://biblehub.com/nrsvce/matthew/13.htm
TBF I think 1% is less than most currency exchanges charge.

Plus what the post says about restrictions on foreign currencies for a lot of people in developing nations.
One of the hilarious things about rewatching old episodes of Seinfeld is his use of a cordless phone that I swear is the size of a toaster!
Here's an essay reflecting on the value of having a shared experience of the world, cultural or otherwise:

https://theconvivialsociety.substack.com/p/common-worlds-com...
Isn’t that just what CLEAR is?
What a beautiful and high quality presentations. All the praises to the author.
I'd like to see an option to require both biometric and pin.

I believe that some courts in the US have ruled that pins/passwords are protected by the 5th amendment, but biometrics are not, so you can be compelled by the court to do anything that requires only a fingerprint/face to enable.
Would an example of that be something like "This is my pretend black lotus, and here's my actual black lotus in this graded plastic box"?
Well...

Evolution is not primarily driven by the mutation rate. It's primarily driven by differential success of already-existing genetic variation. Over the very, very long term, you need mutation to be the source of that genetic variation, but over the short term mutation is mostly just harmful, and this:

> Like the traits must have already been present in some lower frequency pre crisis, and the crisis distills the traits which are selected for by the crisis.

is correct.

> So probably less evolution moves faster during crisis and more that there is an interesting survivorship bias related to crisis when analyzing the change of a species over time.

This is conceptually wrong; in this context "survivorship bias" bears a technical name you've probably heard of, "natural selection". A stronger survivorship bias means faster evolution.
It's easier and safer to use a VPN than it is to meet a man in a dark alley for some dollars.
Honestly? I find that teens have lost trust in basically everything in modern society, not just tech.
Seconded. The counterfeiters are idiots.
That all seems logical. What is the connection to the previous point?
Mistral supports prefixes: https://docs.mistral.ai/guides/prefix/
This looks really cool. Is the data available?
Obviously not. I wonder why this stablecoin scam still exists, it violates every possible financial regulation out there.
Where does the USD have the most purchasing power?
It's the Internet itself.
The idea is that your newsfeed eventually becomes uniquely tailored to you.

Of course it contains posts that may be shared widely and thus unifying, or posts from your close friends and relatives and thus also unifying in a way. This is not a given though, and the context of your newsfeed is effectively unique.

This is one of the reasons community feeds exist, which are the same for the members of a community and thus somehow unifying, around a topic of interest.
Why? If customers still need those services, bigger businesses will provide them and hire the newly-unemployed.
In 2021 alone, the FBI conducted up to 3.4 million warrantless searches of Section 702 data to find Americans’ communications. --https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/04/internal-documents-show-how-little-fbi-did-correct-misuse-section-702-databases

So the story is that California isn't holding up their end of the police state? Compared to the FBI they're hardly trying.
Sounds like we need more safety regulations.
>The Committee finds that the domestic activities of the intelligence community at times violated specific statutory prohibitions and infringed the constitutional rights of American citizens. The legal questions involved in intelligence programs were often not considered. On other occasions, they were intentionally disregarded in the belief that because the programs served the "national security" the law did not apply. While intelligence officers on occasion failed to disclose to their superiors programs which were illegal or of questionable legality, the Committee finds that the most serious breaches of duty were those of senior officials, who were responsible for controlling intelligence activities and generally failed to assure compliance with the law.[1] Many of the techniques used would be intolerable in a democratic society even if all of the targets had been involved in violent activity, but COINTELPRO went far beyond that ... the Bureau conducted a sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of First Amendment rights of speech and association, on the theory that preventing the growth of dangerous groups and the propagation of dangerous ideas would protect the national security and deter violence.

So how are we going to prevent history from repeating itself (which it looks like it already is)?

All it takes for bad people to win, is for good people to do nothing.
Product Hunt was relevant...a decade ago.
Absolutely.

The things that did the most to drive down use were raising the price of cigarettes (which fund the healthcare costs) and banning smoking indoors, where it affected even non-smoking workers [1]. When we stop subsidizing harmful behavior, we get a lot less of it.

Especially in places that are super-cold.

[1] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1155/2012/961724
I know this HN and populated by developers. But there are a lot more ways to get into a FAANG than software development and still make top of market comp.

For instance Amazon is a FAANG. But at the end of the day, they are 50% a consumer goods company. I know people who have gotten in through Finance because they had experience at another CPG company, someone who got in through the marketing department and someone hired as an internal recruiter.

All of the BigTech companies have thousands of non tech jobs that pay top of market.

I personally got into AWS (no longer there) because I was a good enterprise developer, I had AWS experience and I knew how to lead projects and talk to people. I got a job in the Professional Services department as a hands on consultant (full time direct hire). There were all types of non tech jobs in my department - sales, project management, program management, etc.

On that same note, if I wanted to get back into another FAANG (at 50 I would rather get a daily anal probe with a cactus), I would have a much better chance getting into Google via the Google Cloud Consulting division than someone trying to “grind leetcode” and get in as a software developer. Yes that is also a full time position.

Final note: ageism is very real in the industry. But more nuanced. If you are old, have the experience you “should” have for your age, an up to date skillset a great network and a reputation, the world is your oyster.

If any of that is not true, especially in 2025, you’re screwed.
The expected outcome of using a LLM to decompile is a binary that is so wildly different from the original that they cannot even be compared.

If you only make mistakes very rarely and in places that don't cause cascading analysis mistakes, you can recover. But if you keep making mistakes all over the place and vastly misjudge the structure of the program over and over, the entire output is garbage.
True on both fronts
> According to actual data rather than vague virtue signalling

> They made up 55% of

You just debunked yourself. Are there any diversity program for men? They are minority, only 45% (or much lower if you count other genders)! We need mandatory quotas! In other fields like IT, it is a huge problem!!!
DeepSeek is NOT as smart as o1 on unseen IQ questions
> Minimum wage should be temporary - so this study is kind of stupid.

I see this type of attitude/comment frequently whenever the minimum wage comes up, but I've never seen any kind of justification for it.

If these aren't "real jobs" that deserve "real pay" then why are there billion(trillion?) dollar corporations built entirely on top of employing millions of people at minimum wage?
> pixel counts are objective

Pixel counts are objective. But the problem is that while the pixel count sets the upper bound on the image quality, all cameras don't achieve that upper bound - especially due to the Bayer color filter matrix.

To hit this point home, try taking a photo on a smartphone with a 12-megapixel camera. Now take the same photo on a professional camera, say the Canon EOS R5 with an expensive L-series prime lens. The R5 photo has 45 megapixels, so go and downsample that to 12 megapixels to match the phone photo. The pro camera photo will look much better than the phone photo, thus demonstrating that the phone camera is not maximizing the limits of the 12 MP picture format.

(Also, to make the comparison fairer, take a landscape photo of faraway scenery and buildings so that there are no effects of focus blur from having a large lens aperture. Everything in the photos should be in sharp focus.)
Is there a legitimate reason for collectors to value an authentic card more than a counterfeit card?
Yep, AGPL can run alongside proprietary services without issues, and if you host it without modifications, you don’t have to share anything. But if you modify it and make it available over a network, you have to provide the source to users.

Mathesar, however, is GPL, so you only need to share modifications if you actually distribute the software itself.
so, p-hacking, or following a meaningful wage increase, employees are more likely, or more able to report an injury, and the actual rate of injury didn't change?

Or am I missing another more obvious conclusion here?
I'm in a similar situation but a decade older. My "aha" moment came with Ivan Savov's "No Bullshit Guide to Math & Physics". For some reason working through this book "sticks" in a way that Khan Academy and similar online tools haven't. That, combined with randomly reading entries in "Mathematics 1001" have gotten me to where I can read through audio acoustics/DSP and information theory papers (my main area of interest) and understand what's going on.

https://minireference.com/

https://books.google.com/books/about/Mathematics_1001.html?i...
> If safety makes this harder, I would prioritize job-mobility over safety.

Climbing any ladder - physical or economic - is much harder with injuries.
Hi! Could you explain how to use it?
Yes the data is available on our github https://github.com/General-Analysis/GA
Yes, okay.

I think we're talking about different time scales - I'm talking about the next few, maybe two or three decades, essential the future of our generation specifically. I don't think what you're describing is relevant on that time scale, and possibly you don't either.

I'd add though that I feel like your dystopian scenario probably reduces to a Marxist dystopia where a big monopolist controls everything.

In other words, I'm not sure whether that Earth-spanning autonomous system really needs to be an AI or requires the development of AI or fancy new technology in general.

In practice, monopolies like that haven't emerged due to competition and regulation, and there isn't a good reason to assume it would be different with AI either.

In other words, the enemies of that autonomous system would have very fancy tech available to fight it, too.
You said in your comment above that he's "out there ranting about wokeism like a lot of them now, he's losing the plot", as if his stance is a new thing. I was just pointing out that his stance is not new.

I'm not aware of the relationship between wokeism and his stock portfolio. He wrote the first essay when YC was not even around.