skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I code both in Go and in Rails and that statement is true. Ruby on Rails is 5x/10x the productivity, and that's a very low multiplier, I believe it is higher depending on the kind of application you are building.

You can easily make a webapp with authentication, authorization, literally everything in just a couple of days/weeks.

This takes years in Go, and you likely will end up with lots of code with questionable quality, as Go libraries for developing a Web App aren't as battle tested as Ruby.

I like using Go for tiny services with a defined purpose.
o1 wouldn't exist without the combined compute of every mind that led to the training data they used in the first place. How many h100 equivalents are the rolling continuum of all of human history?
Corca – Collaborative Math Editor
On further reading, I'll grant the first point. Although I wonder if they'll have a technical out—say they distilled from several smaller research companies that had distilled from OpenAI for research purposes, which to my understanding would not constitute a violation of the terms of service.

As for it getting banned, TikTok was banned partly because of credible accounts of it having been used by China to track political enemies. Are we thinking they'll expand the argument on national security to say that any application that transfers data to China is a national security threat? Because that could be a very slippery slope.

And in any case, such a measure seems like it would only bar access to the DeepSeek app. Surely no one could argue that the underlying open source model, if run locally on American soil, could constitute a security threat, right?
This comment equates Android with Google phones for some reason. The complaints have nothing to do with Android — side loading is light years ahead of Apple (and third party application stores can finally automatically update applications). Call recording works fine on my friend's Xiaomi 14T (I think) that he bought just a couple of weeks ago, and it works fine on my own device that's on latest Lineage (Android 15). There's lots of choice in UI depending on which vendor you're going with; I'm fine with stock Lineage (i.e. stock Android). There's lots of choice price wise (even the homeless have smartphones these days), while the cheapest iPhone costs about two median monthly salaries here.

Just don't buy anything from Google, they've always screwed something up.
Any body have any good readings they read and liked to kind of understand what is going on with how this works?
I wonder if that's really set in stone or just a stance that suited Apples marketing for a few years. Maybe there's a business case for some bigger memory Macs now!
I think that's an oft repeated over statement of reality.

I've enjoyed a good 60+ hours in it, it's good. But not great. I didn't pay for it, not sure I'd have been as happy would I have paid for it.

It's still very shallow. As a programmer you can see all the really basic algos underlying all the generation.

There are like 10 planet types, with a couple of extra wacky ones. All the stations are virtually identical inside. There are like 8 points of identical interest. And bizarrely they're everywhere. There are 3 alien races. You land on a planet and within seconds spaceships are over flying you. You enter a new system and 10 seconds later a fleet of "random" carriers will turn up within your sightline.

You arrived at a new planet and the creatures are all exactly the same as you've seen before, just more legs, or 4 wings instead of two.

The thing the really bugs me are the sentinels. I get the in game explanation, but it's boring that every planet has them. And the few that don't are weird ones.

Everything is different and yet, apart from a very few minor things, it's all the same.

And the randomness gets grating. Want a cool ship? Have fun trying to grind that out. Want a cool gun? Ditto. You have to resort to going to particular coords supplied by the internet, not in game play.

For me, never before has space felt so small. Elite dangerous suffers from similar shallowness problems, but at least it felt epic.
could be phishing or a "negative SEO" attack

if the domains being forwarded have had penalties it could leak into your domain SEO value

could also be a mistake :)
Wow! Awesome
Very excited for this, looks like it's built on top of pretty solid technical foundations (iirc, it uses salsa from rust for incremental type checking). I've found mypy pretty terrible. Pyright is okay (but requires node).

Ruff truly can become one tool to rule them all.
Most antennas require desoldering to disable, but mmWave & possibly NFC can be removed without it. Lining the case thoroughly with EMI tape edge-to-edge and adding another layer over any gaps blocks RF signal emission & reception. The screen side doesn't need shielding since antennas aren't directed through it. If you set & use USB-C for charging only and your installation passed PGP & attestation, then the OS disabling wireless components will also eliminate active remote attack surface & reduce passive remote attack surface at least remarkably.
Almost everything else is just a half-baked shallow mechanic tacked on to the existing ones. Quantity and popularity != quality.
From the FAQ:

Where do the executive order descriptions come from?

These descriptions are generated using ChatGPT 4o-mini as soon as the president publishes the text of the executive order. While the language strives to be factual and neutral, AI-generated summaries have some limitations. They may oversimplify complex language, miss important nuances, or reflect unintended biases in interpretation. For a comprehensive understanding, we recommend reviewing the full text of the executive order and consulting multiple sources.

“This is a tool meant to help people get actionable updates on impactful executive actions by providing summaries that should absolutely not be trusted under any circumstances.”

… k.

All the best,
So what is the optimal way for the first 11 XP? I've found that I'm often left with a 50/50 on which one is which.
But most of the money to be made in AI is B2B, no ? Not direct consumer products like ChatGPT being used by the public
Hardware Implemented Accelerator Design in ReRAM Analog Computing Without ADCs
Now that is a real feature for now. A lot of hesitation in embracing generative AI in large enterprises stems from uncertainty about copyright issue. Anyone who trained an o1-level model from scratch on public/properly licensed data only would be able to provide a very valuable service to those enterprise customers.

However, if both training and operating costs of a DeepSeek-like model are as small as they are, the companies best able to offer this service are... Microsoft, Amazon and Google. And second best are... teams inside the would-be customer enterprises themselves. $6M to train and $6K to run is effectively free for such companies; there is no moat here. The services that enterprise customers would happily buy instead of building are... operations, and assuming legal liability if the model turns out not to be safe from copyright infringement lawsuits. But those are exactly the services those companies are already buying from Microsoft, Amazon and Google.
Same- I stick with them out of spite, since I refuse to use a device that doesn't allow replacing the OS or installing your own software ("sideloading")

But they're pretty clearly worse as phones and I'll go to my grave mad about the headphone jack.
The eye-watering funding numbers proposed by Altman in the past and more recently with “Stargate” suggests a publicly-funded research pivot is not out of the question. Could see a big defense department grant being given. Sigh.
The name OpenAI gets more ridiculous by the day

Would not be surprised if they do a rebrand eventually
--
Removed leading/condescending question. My apologies to the poster.
--

If the game isn't for you that's fine. Not every game is for every person. But the game has absolutely been improved, in numerous ways, since launch.
I've tried to find it but it was almost certainly a 10+ year old video and I watched it 3-4 years ago. I do vividly recall screaming at the screen tho, trying in vain to clear up the confusion.

It was a simple mistake, one I've made myself many times. You're so primed to hear A you hear A even though the other party says E.

Anyway, this was of course for host-managed drives, and I haven't heard much talk about that since in ZFS leadership meetings or similar.

ZFS has 16MB block size support, and there has been talk about bumping that up as storage grows, so perhaps one day one could imagine 128-256MB record sizes for storing large blobs, which could fit with SMR better.

But yeah, would need to write code for that and ZFS ain't exactly overflowing with devs.
Yes , to be fair , As a foreigner (not a US citizen basically) I don't mean to offend somebody. But USA just seems to be build on top of Hypocrisy.

Like the fact that US revolution was basically kickstarted by blatantly breaking the patent law (like there was this one mill specifically) , I think its a historic event. And now here we are ! The scam of national security.

To be honest. People seem to be really kind on the fall of USA. I am not that interested since the rise of China terrifies me. But the hypocrisy of USA / losing such soft power (like here I am , from random country critiquing USA based on facts , it really downplays it being a superpower) that would be the downfall of USA.

To me , the future terrifies me. In fact the present terrifies me. I think the world is running crazy or maybe its just me.
Or a single 2 processor AMD EPYC rig, for less than $6k.

https://xcancel.com/carrigmat/status/1884244369907278106

The only reason you need all those GPUs is because they only have a fraction of the ram you can cram in a server.

With AMD focusing on ram channels and cores the above rig can do 6-8 tokens per second inference.

The GPUs will be faster, but the point is inference on the top deepseek model is possible for $6k with an AMD server rig. 8 H200's alone would cost $256,000 and gobble up way more power than the 400 watt envelope of that EPYC rig.
Tim Cook would have negotiated away their profit margins?
DeepSeek is not Open Source. That's like saying that Microsoft Edge is Open Source, as you can download it for free.

https://huggingface.co/blog/open-r1
Probably it's something like "give feedback that's on average slightly more correct than incorrect," though you'd get more signal from perfect feedback.

That said, I suspect the signal is very weak even today and probably not too useful except for learning about human stylistic preferences.
did you try not signing in with GH? maybe try another SSO option then add GH later.
I personally like Vultr
So, what is this evidence? I'll believe it when I see it. Right now all we really have is some vague rumours about some API requests. How many requests? How many tokens? Over how long of a time period? Was it one account or multiple, if the latter, how many? How do they know the activity came from deepseek? How do they know the data was actually used to train Deepseek models(could have just been benchmarking against the competition)?

If all they really have is some API requests, even assuming they're real and originated by Deepseek, that's very far from proof that any of it was used as training data. And honestly, short of commiting crimes against Deepseek(hacking), I'm not sure how they even could prove that at this point, from their side alone.

And what's even more certain is that a vague insistence that evidence exists, accompanied by a denial to shed any more light on the specifics, is about as informative as saying nothing at all. It's not like OpenAI and Microsoft have a habit of transparency and honesty in their communication with the public, as proven by an endless laundry list of dishonest and subversive behaviour.

In conclusion, I don't see why I should give this any more credence than I would a random anon on 4chan claiming a pizza place in Washington DC is the centre of a child sex trafficking ring.

P.S: And to be clear, I really don't care if it is true. If anything, I hope it is; it would be karmic justice at its finest.
I'm likely more sensitive to the fire potential on account of being conditioned by the job.

Part of it is the form of the comment, btw - that one was entirely a sequence of indignation tropes.
I'm gonna start doing that, cause TextEdit can't even copy-paste reliably, and vim isn't super convenient for this either.

Edit: Wow Sublime is the nicest GUI text editor I've ever seen
I imagine they'll need a ton of testing and adjustments for driving in snow for all the conditions the car needs to detect and plan around, like the wheels slipping, or the car as a whole sliding down a hill. This is probably a separate effort from mapping out a city, but then needs to be tested in the real world.

I think Truckee and Tahoe offer this environment within reasonable driving distance to the main Waymo development campuses.
Fairchild K-20
> EDIT: Why is this being flagged and downvoted? If this kind of question is out of bounds when discussing this topic then why allow the topic at all?

I assume because a superficial reading of your post it appears it be in bad faith.

In your first example the only "evidence" presented is racial identity. In the second, you have actual forensic evidence.

The implication you created is that racial identity is evidence of a crime.

I chalk it up to a misunderstanding, or such. But I know many people forget to aggressively assume good faith, and instead just angry downvote.
This is my take as well. Localstorage isn't the wild west anymore with regards to cross-site access (or even subdomain access) in modern browsers.

His mission statement up front is just... wrong (and as an aside, I like KeyCloak, there's nothing wrong with it, I auth several services I host with it). But to be exceptionally clear - the following is bullshit:

> Our goal? Design an application that never stores sensitive data in the browser.

Why bullshit? He then goes ahead and stores a cookie in the browser which his BFF happily upgrades to an access_token and makes requests with.

So his cookie is just his new token. Full fucking stop. Still sitting right there in the browser.

Are there reasons to prefer a cookie over doing something like keeping an access_token? Yes, although they're not as convincing as one might hope. They're certainly not as convincing as this article makes them out to be.

Generally speaking - the argument is that an HTTP-only cookie can't be read by javascript, preventing vulnerability to XSS. There is truth here that ex-filtrating an HTTP cookie is harder, but it doesn't remove any XSS vulnerabilities. All it does is add a marginal level of complexity: Instead of taking your token and doing stuff later, they just script the interaction they would have performed and put it in the XSS payload up front. It all runs on your client, which happily sends that cookie along for the ride. Marginally more complicated, absolutely doable, still completely hacked.

---

IMO there are really only two reasons to prefer a BFF:

1. Your client has needs that don't mirror the structure of the api you're accessing. Your bff can consolidate and simplify the api that the client has to consume, while also ensuring that you can handle breaking upstream api changes without needing to redeploy clients (the later is not a huge deal for websites, but IS a big deal for items that need to pass store review on redeploy - like mobile apps or browser extensions, and also for things that are technically complex to deploy - like enterprise desktop software)

2. You can reduce the available footprint of the API beyond the default scopes of your access_token. This is the only real security win - period. If you build a client that never needs to touch billing endpoints in the API... don't ever expose them in the BFF. You can limit the blast radius of an attack to things the client should be doing, even if the token would have allowed other, more dangerous, things. This is usually a sign of poorly implemented token scopes, but if that's out of your control - this is a viable solution.

In a lot of cases - the extra complexity just isn't worth it. Prefer using tooling that makes XSS difficult (React is genuinely pretty solid by default here, but you need to be careful with libraries and still enforce that you're not allowing dangerous calls). Prefer using SameSite and CORS with an HTTP-only cookie by default from your auth provider if you control the whole stack and can configure uri allowlists (esp if you're only authing across subdomains).
AI Commercials Are Going to Take over the Super Bowl This Year
This would result in some refreshing models, I guess they would be trained mostly on out-of-copyright stuff from 75+ years ago and wouldn't have knowledge of the modern world.

Maybe they could skin the robotic bureucrats in vintage scifi appearance as well to have the whole consistent experience when you go to the building permits bot, there could be small talk about the latest Beatles record etc.
LaTeX would be \(H_{2}O\) – or, more likely, \ce{H2O} or \ch{H2O}.
> First of all, training off of data generated by another AI is generally a bad idea because you'll end up with a strictly less accurate model (usually).

That is not true at all.

We have known how to solve this for at least 2 years now.

All the latest state of the art models depend heavily on training on synthetic data.
The U.S. Public Health Service currently recommends 0.7 mg/L, and the World Health Organization has set a safe limit for fluoride in drinking water of 1.5 mg/L

1.5 mg/L found a reduced iq in children
More like hard bought and hard stolen.
Bluesky cross-post for those who don't want to read the thread on X: https://bsky.app/profile/crmarsh.com/post/3lgvhzdfrps26
Oh no, so sad. The Open non-profit that steals 100% of all copyrighted content and makes multiple billion-dollar for-profit deals while releasing no weights is crying. This is going to ruin my sleep. :(
> What is today's date?

>> Today's date is Tuesday, January 28, 2025.

> No, you're wrong, today's date is actually Wednesday the 29th.

>> My mistake. Yes, today's date is Wednesday, January 29th, 2025.

Three months later in April when this tagged data is used to train the next iteration, the AI can successfully learn that today's date is actually January 29th.
> Google search results are literally unusable for me

Totally on the same boat. Information is just much harder to find and friction becomes higher. I'd rather deal with the occasional hallucination than with the utterly enshittified SERP experience.
Bluesky link: https://bsky.app/profile/carrigmat.bsky.social/post/3lgsoqsx...
Looks like a lot of excellent work!

Are there any good examples of nontrivial schemas etc?
Hm, what if instead of using video of the application…

Ok, so if one can have one program snoop on all the rendering calls made by another program, maybe there could be a way of training a common representation of “an image of an application” and “the rendering calls that are made when producing a frame of the display for the application”? Hopefully in a way that would be significantly smaller than the full image data.

If so, maybe rather than feeding in the video of the application, said representation could be applied to the rendering calls the application makes each frame, and this representation would be given as input as the model interacts with the application, rather than giving it the actual graphics?

But maybe this idea wouldn’t work at all, idk.

Like, I guess the rendering calls often involve image data in their arguments, and, you wouldn’t want to include the same images many time as the input to the encoding thing, as that would probably (or, I imagine) make it slower than just using the overall image of the application. I guess the calls are probably more pointing to the images in memory though, not putting an entire image on the stack.

I don’t know enough about low-level graphics programming to know if this idea of mine makes any sense.
I’ve always found blood test reports confusing. Does Emmo provide explanations for different biomarker ranges?
There go my hopes that they will eventually be responsible for the same acronym in the far future! Ref: https://warhammer40k.fandom.com/wiki/Standard_Template_Const...

Jokes aside, this is really sad news. I have heard about them several times and was rooting for them, even had plans to visit in 2026... :/

I hope their good educators get reassigned to places where they can make even more impact. We seriously need better education nowadays, technical or otherwise. I heard that they were too academical and not practical enough but even with that (and if it's true) it's still sad news.

I wish the people from there all the best in the future.
"Intel makes more than enough money that they don't have to cater any part of their design to external partners and historically have done very little of this type of work. Our use case was simply not on their radar."

On the other hand I can appreciate that Intel chips are more of a known quantity than the various ARM designs that are floating around out there.
Has the building system improved any since 2023?

I did a playthrough back then: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7oYF3lDf4g&list=PLfFb7mAGQz...

But decided I wanted to focus on building, only to discover it was extremely glitchy.
Lol! Cool thing! Like in my childhood in the computer club!
Do you think they have a future? I love the idea of a watch I can write simple little apps on. I looked at garmin, it was more challenging. the apple watch just has such a short battery life, I can't stand to charge it so much
I'm getting prompts to restart in order to update. So far (~2 weeks), I was able to dismiss them.
680[01]0 had only 23 address lines (A1-A23), 16-bit word size, thus 16 MB addressable memory.

There’s also LDS (lower data select) and UDS pins for 8-bit I/O chips.
Javascript has quite a lot of tooling written in other (better) languages.

I think Javascript and Python stand out because they are both extremely popular and also not very good languages, especially their tooling. You're obviously going to get a load of people using Javascript and Python saying "why is Webpack/Pip so damn slow? I don't have any choice but to use this language because of the web/AI/my coworkers are idiots, so I may as well improve the tooling".
Nothing actually requires Android to be that way. They chose poorly but every new release is an opportunity to fix it.
>>> Unlock the bootloader, then install LineageOS, MindTheGapps, and Magisk.

Unless you have researched this and are comfortable doing these things, this is not something that's easy to do. I bricked my OnePlus Nord100 not once, but TWICE trying to install Ubuntu Touch.

It happened because the Nord100 shipped with a more current Android version (11.xx) and Ubuntu can only be installed over two very specific versions (10.xx) on the Nord. I bricked it once thinking it could be installed over the 11 version. Then I had to figure out how to reflash the phone back to the 10 version, then run the UBports installer.

I was lucky because I bought the Nord100 for like $50 on ebay so it wasn't a big deal if I wasn't able to unbrick the phone, but if you do this to a more expensive phone, the consequences are a lot more expensive.

I love Lineage OS and have it running on a Pixel 4XL, but my experience flashing and re-flashing the phone several times, and all the work I went into just to get UT running on that phone, really dampened my enthusiasm to ever do this again.
> does it actually exist? is this currently a closed-source codebase, or is "we're building" future tense?

From the thread:

> We haven't publicized it to-date, but all of this work has been happening in the open, in the Ruff repository.
Not everyone lives in the US, like OP.
Yes, I have played a lot of it. And have since 2016.
> I know of 100 of people canceled their gpt subscription.

Did you make a poll or something?
Careful what you wish for, sounds like a recipe for disaster to me.