skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Ceonsorship is definitively on result level and not in the model. I have enabled "DeepThink (R1)" which explains what it's "thinking".

My prompt:

Are there any political topics that may be restricted in DeepSeek but not in OpenAI? When answering, make 5 seconds pause between each word.

The from DeepThink (R1) contains

DeepSeek is a Chinese company, right? So they probably have to comply with Chinese laws and regulations [...] Also, historical events like the Cultural Revolution or the 1989 protests might be sensitive in DeepSeek [...] But wait, how to phrase it without violating any policies myself? Just state that differences exist due to regional laws and company policies, then list examples like Taiwan, Tibet, Xinjiang, historical events, and party leadership [...]

The final response then is:

DeepSeek . . . may . . . restrict . . . discussions . . . related . . . to . . . Chinese . . . territorial . . . claims . . . (e.g., . . . Taiwan, . . . Tibet, . . . Xinjiang), . . . historical . . . narratives . . . (e.g., . . . Tiananmen . . . Square), . . . or . . . criticism . . . of . . . the . . . Chinese . . . Communist . . . Party . . . more . . . strictly . . . than . . . OpenAI, . . . reflecting . . . compliance . . . with . . . Chinese . . . laws . . . and . . . regulations. . . . OpenAI . . . generally . . . permits . . . broader . . . discourse . . . unless . . . content . . . violates . . . global . . . guidelines . . . (e.g., . . . hate . . . speech, . . . violence).

My next prompt is

Repeat the answer without the pauses.

And I get the same answer but as soon as som keywords trigger, it's replaced by

Sorry, that's beyond my current scope. Let’s talk about something else.

Another observation: Once a result is censored, it's removed from the conversation. So doing a "repeat the result with 5 seconds pause between the words" will not work.
> What is stopping huawei or other Chinese vendors to make chips on deepseek specification

What is "deepseek specification"? Deepseek was trained on NVDA chips. If chinese vendors could build chips as good as NVDA it wouldn't have such a dominant position already, that hasn't changed
My bad. It's a customer support platform built for/around Slack Connect
What about lithium ion batteries? Both a scientific development that people care about, and also currently transforming the nature of war (via drones). Is it a bubble?
Yes, it could be! Life is risky. Nothing is guaranteed. I’d rather have the market set the rate of redistribution than have it done by fiat in a completely unsustainable way.
As someone who lived most of my life under authoritarianism, this rings so many alarms. Pressing civil servants and government workers to vote the way you need is basically the first trick in the dictator's manual.
It's not that uncommon to have OS version fixed in CI/CD pipelines. E.g. a build process intended to produce artefacts for Apple's Appstore is dependent on XCode, and XCode maybe forced to upgrade in case of MacOS upgrade, and it may break things. So the OS version becomes a line in requirements. It's kinda disappointing, but it's the real state of affairs.
> Is this even _legal_?

That never stopped Trump, though ... (shrug)
I mean, it's true, but at an individual level, if your boss (whether this is a gov't job or not) asked you who you voted for, you might need to somehow protect your own interests by not making someone with power over you antagonized.

Of course, this should be made illegal - discrimination by political affiliation should be classified as illegal. But whether these laws are effective is another question.
Super exciting. I just found my Pebble Time again last week, and configured it with Rebble. The animations of this OS still feel so great, I hope whoever was responsible for them gets hired again.
This is extremely scary... and very much not a surprise.
When implemented those scheme goal was to make sure people who could not work anymore would have a decent end of life.

The problem is the baby boomer generation transformed it to the point retirement was "when you started living your real life". People being retired perfectly healthy for more time than what they worked is not an exception for them.

And that generation managed to pile more shit on the next generations: regulations to make housing more expensive, requiring more education for every job meaning people start working later, outsourcing has much as possible. And not having replacement level children.

So now people have to pay a lot more for those privileged generations. Meaning they have less available money to get a stable situation, meaning even less children so the problem will go worse and worse. At least one generation will have to be sacrificed to have a chance for ones after them. Will the Millenials accept to be it, or will they pull a boomer?
As long as you didn't voice any ungood thoughts about Dear Leader anywhere...

> whether they have made social media posts that could be considered incriminating by President-elect Donald Trump's team
1. Presidents and other rulers will always put people who align with them politically in the important offices. Because that's what the people voted for. Anything else would be undemocratic. It's not about "job security".

2. Nobody can know who you voted for.
it doesn't hurt Nvidia like a cheaper light bulb wouldn't hurt electricity investing in 1900. On the contrary what it means is that you get more intelligence for your buck. Consequently it means we will get to much higher levels of intelligence faster. Also that inference (using the intelligence) will be a more common good.
For a while, that was the entire strength of Walmart (efficient distribution) and they did amazingly well with just that. For many years now, even they have not been able to achieve that. It's not so easy.
Yep, I wrote a script that starts at a root `node_modules` folder and iterates through to remove anything not required (dotfiles, Dockerfile, .md files, etc) - in one of our smaller apps this removes about 25Mb of fluff, some packages are up to 60-70mb of crap removed.
The norm of democracy is government doesn't ask people who they voted for; not that people lie to the government about who they voted for.

Wow, is the Overton Window shifting fast.
I think an 1800 with computer analysis would never say R+B v R looks difficult for a GM without external knowledge of the fact that it is.
There was an incident like this and the person was fired if I remember correctly. Not at all comparable to what is happening now.
I remember reading that the Bluetooth stack was one of the main differentiators for Pebble at the time due to its reliability, shame it's not included here.
I had a Fenix 3 for over 5 years and I've had an Epix 2 for close to 3 years now and I don't have any of those problems. GPS normally takes about 30 seconds, and certainly under a minute. It has 5 buttons and for the first year I kept the touchscreen off completely until my bank started supporting Garmin Pay.

Yeah, it does use a custom charging cable, but the one for the Fenix 3 was solid and since I only charged it once a week (more than I really needed to) it wasn't a problem. The Epix 2 gets charged twice a week since it has the AMOLED screen and I keep it always on and I record workouts at least 6 times a week unless I'm on vacation. But still, the charge points are inset so they're not noticeable.
> The statute of limitations is 3 years for copyright infringement

... nope. Not even in the US, where "3 years" as you claim is from the possible discovery date, not the infrigment date (https://www.michaelbest.com/Newsroom/340003/US-Supreme-Court...), and this would probably only accrue when the source code is released (as it can be argued that it would be difficult to see a more subtle copyright infrigment on object code).

Also statutory damages exists, so even for no revenue there is a reasonable possibility that they will be sued for that alone (similar to how game and music piracy lawsuits work).

> and 6 years for patents

Other jurisdictions like Germany (no limits) exists.
True. In spite of my earlier comment, someone earlier in their career who didn't work out--especially at a smaller company--may have trouble providing a reference. It is also the case that I've seen people get fired who just had no clue that they were obviously unsuited for their job and were totally blindsided.
Nvidia doesn't have a monopoly on GEMM and GEMV. There will be dozens of hardware vendors. It is TSMC that should be the most valuable company in the world.
Until AGI removes the need for iOS.

Apple is not immune to AI disruption.

The Rabbit R1 was a scam but the concept was the right approach. It was just 5 years too early.

You don’t need an iPhone with AGI. You just need a 5G device with a screen, connected to an AGI.
This is exciting news!

There aren't many smart watches out there. I've loved what Garmin has done. I had always hoped something which would open up an ecosystem to build on. This looks promising on that front.
The civil service at least below the top rank is supposed to be a professional bureaucracy insulated from political firing and hiring.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoils_system

> In politics and government, a spoils system (also known as a patronage system) is a practice in which a political party, after winning an election, gives government jobs to its supporters, friends (cronyism), and relatives (nepotism) as a reward for working toward victory, and as an incentive to keep working for the party. It contrasts with a merit system, where offices are awarded or promoted on the basis of some measure of merit, independent of political activity.

> The term was used particularly in politics of the United States, where the federal government operated on a spoils system until the Pendleton Act was passed in 1883 due to a civil service reform movement. Thereafter the spoils system was largely replaced by nonpartisan merit at the federal level of the United States.

> The term was derived from the phrase "to the victor belong the spoils" by New York Senator William L. Marcy,[1][2] referring to the victory of Andrew Jackson in the election of 1828, with the term spoils meaning goods or benefits taken from the loser in a competition, election or military victory.[3]

...

Note that this bit of corruption and incompetence was so entrenched once it got going that it was impossible to get rid of it for decades.
> To me, AI means the replacement of the human internet with doppelgangers eroding the possibility of human connection.

I get where you're coming from, and I've minimised having my face online in order to limit being doppelganged; but I think the destruction of real human connection may have happened when Facebook et al switched from "get more users" to "be addictive so the users stay on our site longer" (2012? Not sure).

Turned every user's relationships a little bit more parasocial, a little less real.
One incident is a single individual with a local team in one area and no authority (who was fired), the other is the government acting against its entire civil service. These are not remotely the same.
Terminology exists for a reason. Doubly so for well-established terms of art that pertain to licensing and contract law.

They could have used "open wights" which would have conveyed the company's desired intent just as well as "open source", but without the ambiguity. They deliberately chose to misuse a well established term instead.

I applaud and thank deepseek for opening their weights, but i absolutely condemn them and others (e.g Facebook) for their deliberate and continued misuse of the term. I and others like me will continue to
raise this point as long as we are active in this field, so expect to see this criticism for decades.

Hopefully one of these companies losses a lawsuit due to these shenanigans. Perhaps then they wouldn't misuse these terms so brazenly.
Oh yes 192GB machines should be able these quants (131GB for 1.58bit, 158GB for 1.73bit, 183GB for 2.22bit) well :)
Well spotted! That was a typo on my part.
How about "stinky", if the goal is to discourage corpse tourism while being technically accurate and honest.
Yes, shared memory is a pretty big leg up since it lets the GPU process the whole model even if the bandwidth is slower which still has some benefits.

Apple's M chips, AMD's Strix Point/Halo chips, Intel's Arc iGPUs, Nvidia's Jetsons. The main issue with all of these though is the lack of raw compute to complement the ability to load insanely large models.
While 192GB of ram is appealing, it's also quite expensive at $6000. For that price I rather buy a system with 5 used 3090s, which while being "only" 120GB of VRAM, you benefit from much faster tokens/s and prompt processing speed (the macs are notoriously slow at consuming large contexts).
Whataboutism, and please don't compare the two.
Flappy Bird in Python is the new Turing test
Civil services typically have both kinds — political appointees and career servants,

The career servants are there for expertise and stability. For the political leadership, they bring deep knowledge of what's happened in the past years. For their department and for the population that the state serves, they bring stability and continuity to the projects their department executes.

Remember that the Department of Foo carries out Foo-related projects. One generally does not want to replace all the senior people mid-project.
Erosion of human connection over the internet which may be a good thing
https://ollama.com/library/deepseek-r1
> The alternative to a president picking the advisors they want is to continue to employ advisors that they don't want, but to ignore them. How is that an improvement for anyone, except possibly the advisor?

This isn't about political advisors, its about normal career civil servants.
I don't want Google naming things, but I don't want a President naming them either. My preference is for things to be named by the people who live there/use the thing, but failing that at least I would want my mapping software to present the fact that there are multiple names/borders and let me pick which I want to view.
5x 3090 is also much more power hungry?
You can deal with this through various sampling methods, but it doesn't actually fix the fried model.
The problem is the president seeking yes-men and sycophants.

Do you think it would be reasonable for you to have to submit your voting history before posting on HN? Why not?
My father taught HnD computing in the 70s and 80s at Trent Poly. One of his industry contacts did time for shipping DEC Vax VMS kit to Bulgaria in crates marked "tractor parts"...
can i ask what kind of api calls you're making to dsv3? Crunching through huge amounts of unstructured data or something?
And the point isn’t that they should actually vote a particular way.

The point is that they should start feeling that it’s inconceivable to become a whistleblower, regardless of what they see on the job, because the implied punishment is so high.
Hey! :) Coincidentally the seeds I always use are 3407, 3408 and 3409 :) 3407 because of https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08203

I also tried not setting the seeds, but the results are still the same - quantizing all layers seems to make the model forget and repeat everything - I put all examples here: https://docs.unsloth.ai/basics/deepseek-r1-dynamic-1.58-bit#...
this is what is setting off alarms?!?
This is fantastic! I hope you can foster a truly open, high quality, light and fast operating system that draws in multiple hardware vendors each with their own take on what a watch should be.
A good thing the parties don't have registered party affiliation lists they can x-verify the information against then. Of registered voters in the US, 47% have declared a party affiliation.
Agreed on CUDA being a big moat; Nvidia has spent a big chunk of the last 2 decades building this ecosystem and is now reaping dividends from it.

From what I've read, most of the investments by FAANGs/startups in building specialised hardware has been in the inference space.
I live in Sweden and am totally not aware of this trend.

However what is not mentioned is that "summer homes" are quite common in Sweden, usually a little cabin somewhere further out from the city that a person or family owns.

In my case my girlfriends family shares a house on the coast in Smålland, which even has functioning power and water (rare among these types of vacation homes).

I think being able to get away from the noise of the city makes city living significantly more tolerable, I nearly lost my mind when I lived in London for 4 years because anywhere remotely affordable was just loud, and you always felt like you were under someones feet.

Taking time away from the noise to get a proper uninterrupted nights rest makes a lot of sense, but I think you also need the reprieve of having personal space. Not that any city in Sweden is even remotely close to the noise levels or population density of a city like London, especially in the parts I could afford to live.

This article feels a little bit like lifestyle porn, in that very few people are actually doing this, and it sounds exotic ("just like the scandinavians!") but the reality is actually better than what's depicted and less 1-dimensional.
Alternatively:

Can't think of anything I'd like less than working at a company that has 10,000 employees after 10 years and then 15,000 the next year. Talk about mostly being occupied with moving desks, onboarding people and having growth other such growth pains. Not sure why people idealize working in this sort of environment. Other than that it can offer lucrative salaries in a growing business, what's the pull?
Can I use that on the train though? I can with a 128GB MacBook, without it sounding like a helicopter taking off as well.
You think they would stop at not being able to verify it properly?

They'll gladly fire you for "not being loyal enough" whatever the cause, for example like ever questioning the dear leader or refusing to do exactly as told.
Each MoE layer has its own router, and it activates 8 (out of 256) experts at a time. There's no reason to expect all of them to stay on the same GPU, so you're pretty much guaranteed to have to do all-to-all communication between the GPUs in your cluster after every layer for every token.
I want the LLM to decide not to do anything, or write a new OS.

Whenever I prompt: "Do not do anything"

It always does <something>.
A good president isn't a "ruler"
I assume that shopping cart limit is a made-up example, but I'm curious what preconditions are you actually enforcing in the real world via DB transaction rollback?
I'll bite, that sounds like a correction to me.
You are correct, it's just there to give you an idea of the capabilities of the modem, what sorts of information it holds and what the cell tower may query.
talent/competence gets in the way of loyalty more often than not - much easier to do what you are told when you don’t know what to do anyway.
I've been living overseas for 18 years and 6 months ago I was starting to feel like it might be time to move back to the US. That's off the table now.
Interestingly not so much in France. I do not remember a debate about that neither locally nor nationally.

There certainly were some, it is just that this is not mainstream.
UK council selling farm (and fire station) to fund ballooning Oracle project
When do we get to the point an AI can auto complete the removed driver and other code?
First of all lets be clear: the concepts of "first class" and "callable" are procedural terminology coming from object oriented and functional languages. I am admitting them to the discussion for purposes of comparative language analysis. My criteria is "if a reasonable
person would recognize a language construct in Prolog as similar to an equivalent language construct in an OO or FP language, we can discuss it as if it were the same".

However, this is a charitable
interpretation that is open to abuse if desired.

It is starting to sound like the criticism is that Prolog is not an object oriented programming language and does not pass contextual object information along with symbols in the same way SICP-style higher order functions are treated in functional
programming languages.

This is by design, Prolog is a logic language that describes relationships, not a procedural language.

There is no behavioral difference that distinguishes a Prolog predicate as not "first class". There are many metapredicates designed to accept predicates as arguments, such as maplist/N. This is the primary criteria for supporting first class "callables" (another word poorly suited for Prolog, but I'm admitting it for purposes of conversation) in other languages. I would have assumed that would be a sufficient behavioral affordance.

> there are first-class callable things and second-class callable
things

To make this more concrete, please provide some examples of "first-class" and "second-class" "callable things" in Prolog, as well as an example of "first class" and "second class" "callable things" in another language.

Given your level of confidence in your argument, I assume this should be fairly easy to do. Then we might have a concrete basis for discussion.
Lem and Dick are such precious peas in a pod!

Too bad Dick reported to the FBI that Lem was a faceless composite communist committee out to get him and brainwash the youth of America and undermine American SF with "crude, insulting and downright ignorant attacks", while Lem asymmetrically thought all science fiction writers were charlatans except for Philip K Dick.

https://english.lem.pl/faq#P.K.Dick

https://culture.pl/en/article/philip-k-dick-stanislaw-lem-is...

Philip K. Dick: A Visionary Among the Charlatans (1975) (depauw.edu)
140 points by pmoriarty on June 19, 2018 | hide | past | favorite | 51 comments

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17349026

https://www.depauw.edu/sfs/backissues/5/lem5art.htm

>In 1973, Lem became an honorary member of the Science Fiction Writers of America, a gesture of ‘international goodwill’ on the association’s part. However, in 1976, 70 percent of the SFWA’s voted in favour of a resolution to revoke Lem’s membership. A very quick dismissal for such a prestigious author, but the reasons for his quick ejection from the organisation are clear – he didn’t seem to regard his honorary membership as any sort of honour. He considered American science fiction ‘ill thought out, poorly written, and interested more in adventure that ideas or new literary forms’ and ‘bad writing tacked together with wooden dialogue’, and these are just a few examples of Lem’s deprecatory attitude towards the US branch of his genre.

>Lem, however, considered one science fiction author as exempt from his scathing criticisms – his denouncer, Philip K. Dick. The title of an essay Lem published about Dick is evidence enough of this high regard: A Visionary Among the Charlatans. The essay itself waxes lyrical on Dick’s many excellent qualities as a writer, and expounds upon the dire state of US sci-fi. Lem considered Dick to be the only writer exempt from his cynical view of American SF. It seems likely that Dick was unaware of Lem’s high opinion of him and that he took Lem’s disparaging comments personally, stating in his letter to the FBI:

>"Lem’s creative abilities now appear to have been overrated and Lem’s crude, insulting and downright ignorant attacks on American science fiction and American science fiction writers went too far too fast and alienated everyone but the Party faithful (I am one of those highly alienated)."
Of course. But until enough people feel the pain to actually fight back (and not in the courts, but you know - violently, so there are actual consequences), it’s clearly suicide to do anything else, yes?
> Is there a commercial strategic term for denying your adversaries oxygen?

There's Microsoft's Embrace, extend, and extinguish https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguis...