skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://archive.ph/lykU5/41dcd169f08144d56f2ba5bc986bcc2af8f...

-- Maria Hergueta,『改善』[0]

Also:
"The ability to get to the [emergency exit] without [exiting] is the [central] art."

--NotDulles

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42866072

From your link, it occurred to me that that particular 非 could be a Taisho(?) era outside-the-box transcription of "Not-"

(易經 -> The Man In The High Castle)

Which engine returns 朝 as "court"? It has to be very classically weighted, if you hadnt had it marked as cháo

[0] surely kaizen can't be the main way in which orgs fail to reinvent the wheel..

https://pldb.io/blog/chrisLattner.html

>Though all the ML compilers today are basically reinventing APL.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42852660
LLM in Litecli for SQLite
> One of the problems with C# is the constant expansion of the language.

And to make matters worse, it seems there's no resource that fully explains all of its relevant aspects, like the Rust book does for Rust for example.

There are tutorials intended for people who can't program at all, there are dry reference documents, there are resources explaining specific features, but nothing that a reasonably competent non-C# programmer could read start-to-finish to fully grasp the language.

There's the Microsoft Docs site, but it seems to contain the same or very similar information scattered through different sections.
I did the same and don't regret it. My Helix config is 4 lines and it does 95% of what I want. The performance of a ton of neovim plugins is also atrocious and I always hated that everything was a hodgepodge mix of C, vimscript and Lua.
As long as we fire all the people who measure these things, they won't exist. /s
Yes, but who will comment then and on what?
On both HN & Reddit, I find the comments more informative and less frustrating than reading the article usually. But I guess YMMV.
I strongly believe it should be the default everywhere.

IMO, you can even skip having a theme switch—that's how native stock OS apps behave (calculator, notepad, settings, etc.).

For websites, I think that should be enough. For web apps however, you might want more control over the theme somewhere in the settings page, as people are more likely to spend a lot of time in your app and may want to customize it a bit more.
Yes it does, just not interactively.
You wait until someone posts an answer here, https://www.reddit.com/r/LLMDevs/comments/1if0q87/you_have_r...

https://www.phind.com/search/cm6lxx6hw00002e6gioj41wa5
Previously:

Show HN: Fully Open-Sourced Online MIDI Editor - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24599679 - Sept 2020 (19 comments)

Signal: Online MIDI Editor - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41987352 - Nov 2024 (24 comments)
>Simply refusing to spend appropriated funds as directed by law...

Again, this is how the issue is being played in a partisan fashion. Yet, when we dig deeper, beneath the soundbite interpretations, we find that legal scholars and Supreme Court justices have complex and conflicted views on how much authority The President has over government bureaus.

>...the President’s authority over independent agencies depends not on the Constitution but on a common statutory phrase, which allows the President to discharge the heads of such agencies for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” This phrase—the INM standard—is best understood to create a relationship of residential review—and a particular remedy for legal delinquency flowing from that review. It allows the President to discharge members of independent agencies not only for laziness and torpor (inefficiency) or for corruption (malfeasance) but also for neglect of their legal duties, which includes egregiously erroneous decisions of policy, law, or fact, either repeatedly or on unusually important matters...

https://www.law.georgetown.edu/georgetown-law-journal/wp-con...

https://www.law.georgetown.edu/public-policy-journal/wp-cont...

The cited sources illustrate how complex the law is. If we accept the authority of the state, then it is up to the Supreme Court to rule on the specifics. If the ruling is in favor of Trump's actions, we can again reasonably expect the partisans to paint this as an out-of-control judiciary. From that point we may see more arguments for "packing the court", the entire narrative around "authoritarianism" again becomes an exercise in partisan hypocrisy.

The point about cutting budgets, agencies and reducing the purview of the state remains. It is in direct contrast to authoritarian ideology, which without exception seeks to expand the purview of the state. Many quips have been leveled here, but no one has approached this point.
I tried using Copilot a bit, but I found it tried to do too much. As often as it got things right it got them irritatingly wrong. Something pared back giving context sensitive snippets would do fine.
What goes around comes around, sqlite now distributes WASM builds that run in the browser: https://sqlite.org/wasm/doc/trunk/index.md
That’s what you get when you have free wealth you can pump out of the ground (or ocean floor in this case). Middle eastern oil countries are very happy too with wealth shared around (for the citizens) and most costs in life covered.
Because if GDP per capita increases cost for services as well as number of required services increases.

Take a car analogy, if the GDP per capita increases such that the number of people who can afford a car doubles, the government will have to invest more in roads. Moreover the expectations to the quality of the roads will likely increase as well. In other words if more stuff gets done in a country your more likely to night more infrastructure and services to support it.
> ...our results give: ... (3) a provable advantage of chain-of-thought, exhibiting a task that becomes exponentially easier with chain-of-thought.

It would be good to also prove that there is no task that becomes exponentially harder with chain-of-thought.
There's no programming-language cozy like Lisp cozy, but I can see myself working quite happily in C#.
Ruby "Thread Contention" Is Simply GVL Queuing
I understand your and OP's situation and I got overwhelmed by all the fancy plugins myself. But then I realized: Hey, I can just use neovim like vanilla vim and don't have to get the next best plugin when it comes out.

I think it happened when I tried out Mason, too. And it didn't feel like an improvement. So I scrapped my config and started a new one. With Lazy (because that's actually nice), Telescope and a few LSPs I need/want. That's mostly it. You don't have to get much fancier than that. (obviously including some basic vim settings and keymaps, but that's just like in vanilla vim, but in lua)
Please re-read my reply. Goroutines are stackful coroutines.
Not necessarily. The UK had that too (the same north sea oil as Norway), but we failed to invest it wisely.
You need to read the article first to know that. But most people won't.
Sorting this list by "Value NOK" shows their biggest holdings:

https://www.nbim.no/en/investments/all-investments/#/2024/in...

Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta ...

Does this put Norway at the mercy of the USA?

What if Norway and the USA have an argument and the USA says "You don't want us to freeze your investments in our beautiful tech stocks, do you?".
You can read the article after the comments.
https://github.com/nvim-lua/kickstart.nvim single file config in lua with the essentials. Some of the article still rings true though.
Wait, what am I running on my 32GB Macbook then? I thought it was the 32b version of deepseek-r1.
As a Brit living in Sweden for 10 years (and, who now has naturalised).

It’s incomparable and the parent is definitely right to ponder. Life here is better, even if it has it’s problems.

There is no “working poor” here, serial unemployment is significantly lower. And Sweden is the “worst” nordic country right now for crime and poverty rates. Britain is far-far behind, and getting worse yearly.
Just like with neural networks and Adam [1], LLMs evolve to make transformers their best building block.

[1] https://parameterfree.com/2020/12/06/neural-network-maybe-ev...
There's plenty of dystopian sci-fi out there with all sorts of ideas about that.
>more insidious, level of censorship that is built into the model.

What is your point? You think any other closed foundation models are not censored?
My only experience of C#/.Net programming is by way of powershell. But the comments here make me think it would be a good idea to invest some time in learning c# beyond what it can provide over add-type in powershell. I've mostly avoided it because I thought it was windows only, I've learned dart and flutter for cross platform programming. Can c# run on mobiles?
We should be demanding more from our government! Instead, one side is trying to tear it down, and purposely fights to make government worse so people want to tear it down.
I agree, they are! But reading through them, or even worse, engaging with them, is a serious energy drain.

Especially if somebody is being wrong.
The one china principle is unrelated to the one country two systems concept that you are linking.
Norway as a state may be rich. but the state is also very afraid of spending too much money within the country as not to drive up inflation, salaries etc. In Norway the school children do not even get free/hot lunches (compared to e.g. Sweden).
Was that what you are thinking I'm advocating for? To be clear I agree that the initial lack of generics did weaken original goals. (Even more so because I wrote Rust much more than Go anyway.) I don't agree that such lack is a major deficiency for original goals however, because built-in parametrized types do cover the majority of use cases and higher-level programming envisioned by Go designers needs less generics in general [1].

[1] Assuming that you are not going all in specific design patterns from functional programming, of course.
Yep this reads like someone who tricked out their car, blows out the clutch because it has too much horsepower, then starts pining for the days when they didn’t need a double clutch. You never needed a double clutch!

As an aside I’m surprised that people struggle with vendor management and config management for neovim. Like are people picking unstable packages, or is their config wired up in a super brittle way? If you’re gonna invest in your own tooling, surely it’s your job to set it up to be stable over $TIMEFRAME ? Speaking as someone who’s used pretty much the same Neovim config for a few years with maybe half a day messing with it since setting it up
its almost fun how bad they operated and how shit their softwares really seems if read this. i say almost only because of their victims... if it wasnt crime this would read like a comedy... :s.

its terrible how even bad... bad actors .. can make such big successes. :/ glad some shit got seized but it will likely oy be a minor dent in what they do. they dont give shits because they know they dont need to. thats a sad state considering the massive losses of their victims
Yeah but that's just ordinary rich-dude behavior, it's not unique to him by far.
Could you be so kind to provide a link or reference? I'd like to read their reasoning. Given the novelty of e.g. Kyber, just relying on it alone seems bonkers.
Not that you'd want to have to do more steps, but how do they do if you split it up in separate parts and translate them individually, then feed it back in interleaved in parts/translated parts and ask it to keep the style but fix any errors due to it originally not having full context?

Or another approach, feed it all into context but tell it to wait and not translate, and then feed it in an additionalt time part by part asking it to translate each part and with the translation style instructions repeated.
I agree. It definitely has benefits but the downsides are just too big for most people.
Of all the things to pick, school lunches would not have been it.
Java has been doing great recently and I feel there is a bit of a renaissance going on. There is a very mature leadership at the helm and it shows.
With .NET, it seems that they've added features too quickly without giving it enough thought up front. If you are a small team or working on a short lived project, this might not matter. But for long lived projects by large teams, I'd rather take the more conservative approach.
C# is a nice language, but it has a huge surface area in terms of syntax. Also, Microsoft’s past behavior makes a lot of people avoid it entirely before even considering it.

Plus, many, like myself, just don’t want to write OO code, no matter what. I simply don’t want to spend my time working that way. This makes hiring difficult, especially when many young engineers who start their careers with non-OO languages instinctively shy away from Java-esque languages.

That said, I welcome language diversity in the backend and love that new startups no longer default to Node. I’d rather deal with OO than fiddle with a poorly designed language that was never meant for anything but throwaway frontend code.
Why use a reasoning model for a summarisation task? Serious question, would it benefit?

I don't have much experience with reasoning models yet. That's why.
> In comparison, my new neovim settings are sprawled across 12 files, of which I've copied and pasted and barely understand.

This is the problem.

It's not about Vim vs Neovim as you could mostly likely just run your old Vim configuration in Neovim.

The problem is that you don't understand your own configuration.

The conclusion of the article therefore feels entitled: why shift the blame from your own lack of understanding to the author of plugins that they provide for free?
You mean they're so rich the government don't need to pay for the food for the poorest in society?
Oh the joys of parsing English.
> it implies that at least every business that builds something that
can move information around must be knowledgeable about tianenman
square

Everyone's heard of the "Streisand effect", but there's layers of
subtlety. A quite famous paper in attachment psychology by John Bowlby
"On knowing what you are not supposed to know and feeling what you are
not supposed to feel" is worth considering. Constructive ignorance
(literally ignoring certain things) is a survival mechanism. Yes,
everyone in China knows about Tianamen, specifically because the
government want to censor it. Much of how we navigate the social world
is watching for the things people don't talk about, seeing where
their fears lie.
I spent five years building a webapp and got my first $1 (2022)
"Performance is rarely the primary reason to choose a language, but it’s certainly a nice bonus."

(X) Doubt
Ask HN: Please Review My Startup Chatty AI – Operator for Your Website
Here's my quick pitch: Chatty AI is a custom operator for your website. Unlike generic ChatGPT operator, our widget is directly embedded into your product and knows your knowledge base, docs, and how to use your specific product. You can use it to improve onboarding, conversions, and customer support. It's super easy to set up. I would love HN's feedback and especially would like to chat directly if someone is interested in giving it a try. We can do all the work. You can email me directly at samat@chattyoperator.com

Here is the link - https://chattyoperator.com/
Someone else has written this exact code on the internet, OpenAI stole it, and now chatgpt is regurgitating it. Just like it can regurgitate whole articles.

You need to stop being wow'd by human intelligence masquerading as AI!
Since I see Helix being mentioned here, I'll start this comment by noting that I am the author of the helix-vim[1] repo which has been shared very widely at this point.

I still stand by everything I wrote in that repo, but these days I'm a very happy NixVim user, with my own little mini NeoVim distro, JeezyVim.[2]

I hate to do the "Nix fixes this" meme, but in this case, it really does fix this particular issue of the NeoVim plugin ecosystem and its constant breaking change update culture being a nightmare for end users.

You can build something that works and pin the dependencies all the way down and have a NeoVim config which will pretty much work forever.

Yes, the initial investment is significant, but for me it's absolutely worth it to be able to provision any machine, any VM, any bare metal server and have my entire NeoVim config completely at the ready with all required dependencies in place.

[1]: https://github.com/LGUG2Z/helix-vim

[2]: https://github.com/LGUG2Z/JeezyVim
I put one of my own blog posts through NotebookLM soon after it became available, it hallucinated content I didn't write and missed out things I had written.

Nice TTS, but otherwise I found it unimpressive.
It's here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp

First result when searching "C# guide" or "C# language documentation".

Or if you want a more detailed view up front, it's https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/tour-of-csha..., which you'll end up inside of the menu structure somewhere by clicking any of the links in the first page.

I've put several developers at work through reading this and they've gotten up to speed in the language very quickly. It's comprehensive and, at least according to what I think is important having been doing C# for 20 years, very well organized.
> My only hangup is that I have had my confidence shaken by Microsoft's occasional showing of hand...

I think a really good strategy is to try to see if your goals align here. That's where C#/MS shines compared to many other languages supported by companies. Their interest is in you using C#, because they know that drives Azure adoption (well-known main reason why they're spending money on .NET). MS as a company also has a very long term strategic interest in selling stuff where it's awesome to have a ton of developers in their environment. It's been like that forever. Say what you want about Balmer, but he was very clear on this "developers, developers, developers". It's in their core DNA. A lot of their main product lines excel due to the mass of developers around them; Office (eg SharePoint and integrations), Business Central/ERP (integrations, plugins), Windows (ecosystem of software), Azure (including tooling such as Visual Studio, VSC). Gaming/Search/Live I'm less sure about, but at least for gaming C# probably helps.
The "in prod" is implicit, no one is trying to stop you from learning things.
Great post, instead of the usual rewrite X in Y, because reasons.
I'll suggest maybe tailscale is what you are looking for to share with family a VLAN
That's the question...
This reason is the same as everywhere in the west. Capitalism has created a massive wealth inequality where the normal person have less and less, with increasing costs they can’t afford.

Right wing parties come in and blame the immigrants as the reason for the decline. They offer simple answers rather than the hard truth that the system is inherently unfair and unjust.

The real solution is to move to a post capitalism economic system but no politicians from the mainstream parties are pushing for this as companies have to much influence and power in society.
This leaves very few mainstream languages left like C available, as everything else does support some form of OOP, regardless of the shape it is exposed on the programming language type system.

OOP is not going away from mainstream.
Foot would be beyond perfect if it had ligature support.
That's a shame on Google, Apple, Samsung, etc. Voice and other activation methods should be open to any app that claims to be an assistant. An ugly way of "gatekeeping".
I think C# has the highest ratio of (happy) programmers to internet discussions, at least among mainstream languages. This makes it look a lot less popular and cool for people outside the ecosystem.

I think that it's also much more common with companies that aren't primarily tech-focused, as those companies usually have cosy relationships with Microsoft. Pure tech companies, startups and FAANGs don't seem to use it much.

This also ties into geography. In the US, far more people work for startups, FAANGs and pure tech companies than in Europe, where traditional businesses and "software houses" are far more prevalent, which means there's far more C# there.
The industry being who? Because this is the first time I've heard of Bruno? And what does it do that the others don't?
Dropbox to Reincorporate in Nevada
Are these applications forever doomed? First Postman, then Insomnia, now Bruno...
Musk basically offered shareholders a deal that if he 10x ed the stock he gets 10% of that. The shareholders oked it twice but a judge in Delaware said lets block that. It wasn't really about greed.

I kinda feel in business if two parties make a deal and are happy with it then it's not really the job of the courts to prevent them.
I've just spent weeks in Japan, where the government very much seems to care.
It’s also kind of ironic - is Apple the first corporation to succeed in applying the “corporate cult” strategy to consumers at such a scale?
Ern, in DeepSeek’s case, it’s not “news articles” that they’d be most concerned about.
I think it's not healthy anymore; game devs I know are kind of part artist, part coder, often more the former than the latter and so they spend crazy time on polishing things and making it perfect only to get no feedback, no sales, no nothing. It must be incredible frustrating and basically painful, leading to burnouts.
The Nordic countries have a lot of problems too.

One example is their completely failed drug policy, which is aimed at repression instead of care and therapy.
I’m not exactly angry at it. Just pointing out the flaw in its argument.

It’s never worked to yell at my junior developers and tell them that ‘hell is them doing any kind of development’.

It works better when I just show them what they should do instead.
> a wife and kids are the most meaningful and joyful things a man can have.

They can be. They're not always. How many deeply unhappy people are in awful marriages? By the fact that 40-50% of all marriages end in divorce, I'd say it's 50/50 at best. How many people should never have been parents?

And also, that's like, your opinion man. There are other views - perfectly valid - on what is most meaningful and joyful. How many childless unmarried women (and men) find great meaning and joy in other activities, but feel pressured to procreate by a segment of society which sees their worth solely in homemaking?

> marriage and kids are crazy things to stack up against house size

I think so too. Yet many people value themselves by how big their house is... Not too common a trait among stoners, I might add.

> i think comparing those to a house and suggesting they're unimportant, or no more important than getting stoned,

I don't think I did that by any fair reading of the comment.

> is a great example of why so many of us dislike stoners.

Stoners tend to think outside of societal norms a bit more often, seeking a broader perspective. They also tend to reflect internally on what actually makes them happy. They might end up thinking, 'wow, I don't think marriage is a big goal in life for me'. Or, 'like, who is a priest to tell me my relationship is valid?', or 'Jesus, is it actually kinda selfish to want more kids on a planet with 8 billion people maxing out it's resources?'.

I think those are valid and important questions + perspectives; and that it's kinda mindless to shit on people for exploring things for themselves.
Imagine people saying this when the Roman empire collapsed. They thought that just because the empire is strong and old it would last forever.
You will always have problems in any country. Norway ranks at 7 in happiness, Sweden at 4. The top four places are Nordic countries. UK ranks 20.

Having lived in Finland and UK, I definitely don't want to live in UK.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/happiest-...
If the comments say it's worth it I read it, but often (especially on HN) the top comment starts with a summary of errors/inconsistencies in the article and then I don't really feel the need.