skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Or you could just say, "Yes, white lives matter" and move on.

Which people will interpret as a support for the far-right. You may not intend that, but that's how people will interpret it, and your intentions are neither here nor there. You may not care what people think, but your neighbours will. "Did you hear Jim's a racist?" "Do we really want someone who walks around chanting 'white lives matter' to be coaching the high school football team?" "He claims he didn't mean that, but of course that's what he would say." "I don't even know what he said exactly, but everyone's saying he's a racist, and I think the kids are just too important to take any chances."

Welcome to living in a society. 'Moving on' is not a choice for you, it's a choice for everyone else. And society is pretty bad at that, historically.

> What do you mean what does it mean? It means the opposite of white lives don't matter.

> The question is really simple; even if someone asking it had poor motives, there's really no room in the simplicity of that specific question to encode those motives. You're not agreeing with their motives if you answer that question the way they want.

Words can and do have symbolic weight. If a college professor starts talking about neo-colonial core-periphery dialectic, you can make a reasonable guess about his political priors. If someone calls pro-life protesters 'anti-choice', you can make a reasonable guess about their views on abortion. If someone out there starts telling you that 'we must secure a future for white children' after a few beers, they're not making a facially neutral point about how children deserve to thrive, they're in fact a pretty hard-core racist. [0]

You can choose to ignore words-as-symbols, but good luck expecting everyone else to do so.

[0] Context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteen_Words
You might have been misled by a CS professor's enthusiasm about what they thought was neat, or was a good way to communicate something.

But I don't recall seeing someone re-define `define` in real life.

Nor do I recall seeing any problematic redefinitions in Scheme in real life.

That said, if you wanted to make a language variant in which `define` did something different than normal (say, for instrumentation, or for different semantics for variable syntax), then you'd probably use Racket, and you'd probably define your own `#lang`, so that the first line of files using your language would be something like `#lang myfunkylang`.

You can randomly sample code in <https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/>, and look for people doing anything other than `#lang racket/base` or `#lang typed/racket/base`.
Yes, and those crappy sensors will still be 200 megapixels (which will be used as an advertising point), as most people don’t realize that a fantastic 24 MP camera is better than a crummy 200 MP one.
Fully armed spikes (or it's pieces) which are multifunction weapon with unknown mechanisms and side effects.. as a remedy ? - it's like fighting a fire with a fire - but there _was_ some advise to avoid physical activity after vaccination as it could keep that fire only in the muscle - ignoring that more or less of the vaccine will be moved with the blood and do random unknown damage anyway.. to be studied later what maybe could be avoided, "saving" on costs of that half baked experiment needed to make a way to use of "newer, better" vaccines :/
Very cool, any plans for a dockerized API of marker similar to what Unstructured released? I know you have a very attractively priced serverless offering (https://www.datalab.to) but having something to develop against locally would be great (for those of us not in the Python world).
> Yes, the “at-risk”, not the “incubator”, and notice the plural form to “farms”. China has never pretended having found a farm that would have been the source of the virus.

Just days after the virus was discovered, the Chinese government would have had no idea which farm the virus came from. They ordered a broad cull. They might have destroyed our ability to trace the origins of the outbreak by doing that, though from an immediate epidemic-control perspective, it was the correct decision. Maybe they did do testing at those farms, but maybe they didn't. In the case of the market, we know that China CDC only came in and did testing after the local authorities shut down and sterilized the place. Officials were probably much more worried about the immediate spread of the virus than scientifically tracing the origins of the outbreak.

> The US (the state & government) was very far from having tried to make maximum propaganda use of anything regarding covid.

The Trump administration went to great lengths to use the pandemic for propaganda purposes. At first, Trump was "nice" to the Chinese and even praised their response. However, after the virus took off in the US and it became clear that the Trump administration had completely mismanaged it, Trump pivoted to yelling, "China! China! China!"

> Well yes, it was highly accusatory of the typically awful hygienic condition of these markets. That's not racist so, that's just a fact.

There was a huge amount of racist "bat soup" discussion in the United States early on in the pandemic, followed soon by racist phrases like "Kung flu." I remember a viral post that showed a random Asian person eating a bat (it turned out the photo wasn't even from China). That's what the atmosphere was like.

This wasn't an informed discussion about the viral spillover dangers of wet markets (which are ubiquitous in much of Asia, not just China, and are often the primary way people buy groceries). It was mostly people who have no idea what they're talking about (and who have never visited a wet market) talking about dirty foreigners.
None of that has anything to do with "deploying external client facing applications"
The 70b distill at 4bit quantize fits, so yes, and performance and quality seem pretty good. I can't run the gigantic one.
Such Karma lol, I wonder how they trained Sora again? You..tube something
Research FlashFloppy before buying anything.

There's many variants of hardware it can run on. Not all goteks are built the same.
Yes, if you can pay off any witnesses.
I recently switched from years of using TinkerCAD, and really wanted to switch to FreeCAD, but after watching hours of video tutorial of FreeCAD compared to the same for Fusion, it seemed Fusion was just so much more optimized for productivity.
[edit: Nevermind, see below]

The direct disclosure of urls and ports is insane. Wonder if they would be as irresponsible if it was MSFT, OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.

PS: Not defending DeepSeek for bad practices, but still. Nothing irresponsible here.

PS2: It is marked as resolved, I went directly to the vulns due to the title of the post.
Altman was in a bit of a tricky position in that he figured OpenAI would need a lot of money for compute to be able to compete but it was hard to get that while remaining open. DeepSeek benefit from being funded from their own hedge fund. I wonder if part of their strategy is crack AI and then have it trade the markets?
Yeah. Dart's over-rotation on generated code is a googlism. They have a fancy build setup internally which is very good at generated code and caching it.

I know that the build_runner authors are looking into perf as we speak, and I'd be happy to put you in touch with them if you'd like to speak with them about debugging your case:
https://github.com/dart-lang/build/issues/3800

eric@shorebird.dev reaches me (for this or any other Flutter/Shorebird issue).
The nice thing about corporations is that they have to be able to make payroll at the end of every month, otherwise they go bankrupt relatively quickly.

Things can get much uglier and be much more protracted for governments.
I'm not sure why you think why this discovery has to be some sort of "effort in trying to tarnish DeepSeek". Deepseek is the #1 downloaded app and and the media can't stop talking about it. That means a lot more people are looking into the app and possibly finding vulnerabilities, no conspiracy needed.
I should clarify that it isn't my area of expertise either; if you already found something in the kernel, by all means, keep looking there! I was more trying to suggest a starting place but it seems you're past that point already, good work :)
> always update

There's seems to be an army of aspiring CVE bros cargo-culting this idiocy; they pretend to live in a parallel universe where state-sponsored intelligence groups are spending millions to get at the cat photos on their phones.

Obviously the premise that you should just blindly update a device where you have no recourse if the update breaks workflow/functionality/user experience (android, ios) or tries to monetize the hardware you actually own (msft) is prima facie stupid.
They did. They called in J++ and gave it extensions, leading to a schooyard scuffle with Sun. When the school principal said Sun were right, they went off sulking and made Dot Net.
I would love to have one! Imagine all the benefits you just listed, but it's just mine so I can keep my stuff in it. Maybe my car seat or my work equipment or my shopping bags.

I get where I'm going and I send it over the the parking garage a mile away that's cheap, and then summon it back when I'm done with my event, so I never have to circle for parking. If enough people to it, they would probably develop a protocol so that they can be parked at a lot that is super dense and it's a puzzle to get the cars in and out.

And they could still be sold with remote human backup services (as well as giving you the owner the ability to take over if you want to).

I could also send it on errands. Go to Target and pick up my curbside order. Go to the pizza place and have them drop it on the front seat. Pick up my kid from school and bring her home. Go pick up my mother in law and bring her to my house so I don't have to go get her!

And I could use it to drive me to my parents house 350 miles away while I sleep.

I can think of a million reasons I'd want one.
OpenAI is taking the position similar to that if you sell a cook book, people are not allowed to teach the recipes to their kids, or make better versions of them.

That is absurd.

Copyright law is designed to strike a balance between two issues. One the one hand, the creator’s personality that’s baked into the specific form of expression. And on the other hand, society’s interest in ideas being circulated, improved and combined for the common good.

OpenAI built on the shoulders of almost every person that wrote text on a website, authored a book, or shared a video online. Now others build on the shoulders of OpenAI. How should the former be legal but not the latter?

Can’t have it both ways, Sam.

(IAAL, for what it’s worth.)
Yeah, definitely; megapixels are a more or less objective metric, but they're only one factor to image quality, and nowadays not even really the most important one.
That's just straight-up corruption.
I don't see the difference between that and LLM feeding on internet people's data.

They call it IP theft yet when the New York Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement they claimed it's fair use of data.
Moving out of the world of "applications" into shell commands, we're gonna need a new shell that understands that `wget -o myfile https://example.com` needs to be handed a capability to write data, or we need change our habits a lot into always shuffling everything over pipes or such. In either scenario, if you want that level of granularity, I don't think UNIX will survive as we remember it.

(More likely path for now: start a new sandbox, run things in it, put result files in an "outbox", quit sandbox, consume files from outbox. Also not very convenient with current tools.)
The reasoning happens in the chain of thoughts. But OpenAI (aka ClosedAI) doesn't show this part when you use the o1 model, whether through the API or chat. They hide it to prevent distillation. Deepseek, though, has come up with something new.
And Objective-C should have just been Smalltalk without the C baggage

(is this the root NIH syndrome?! I'm guessing no, I'm only 36. maybe LISP enters the picture here?)
Pension costs for the guards are probably also a thing.
Does Tesla actually need to make money? Stock price says no.
I meant in the sense that the additions suggested by the blog post author already exist in multiple sql implementations.
I think you are missing the fact that Dart is actually an incredibly nice language to work with in a way that Go absolutely is not.
They talk about it some in the post, but my understanding is they're going to see if the can solve some of the motivating problems (e.g. json serialization) with simpler one-off solutions rather than a big general language feature.
Years ago I thought about trying to start some non-profit to help companies donate their unused/expired game assets and write them off as a donation so they'd have a financial incentive to give them away.

No idea how well it would work. I wouldn't expect main characters. But landscapes, trees, buildings, props, furniture, animals, some NPCs, skyboxes, vehicles, etc...

I also have no idea what value they could claim, if any.
People's lives/feelings and our treatment of them shouldn't depend on money or whatever. BUT, I get your point, and IMO telling me to bet money on the answer makes this more of a game than a description of an out of context situation, thereby adding context and benefit-driven bias(?) into my thought process before answering
Strong energy of "someone brushed up against me and that's assault" going on here
It's kinda insane that they can't do a "undo last commit; git push; tell the CI/CD to push a new OS release" procedure. But there's a probably Fight-Club-esque math (1) there that make it "If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.".

Congrats Google, your procedures have made you an overweight gorilla that isn't agile enough...

(1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiB8GVMNJkE
Are you saying this report was falsified, or that the press should keep things like this secret?
They don't drive like teenagers do (the Tesla FSD does, but that's another story).

A Waymo drives more like a 50 year old who's seen some shit and drives well but defensively.
I wish I could but literally can't explain it because it's something I came to know via symbology and not via words, so I don't have the words to try and pass it on to others :(

Have you ever seen Interstella 5555? It's a documentary actually.
It must get backed up somewhere - I read recently that a huge cache of Thomas the Tank Engine assets were leaked online (not sure which incarnation but obviously a semi-recent one).

I'd guess at least the big studios preserve for sequels, re-releases, remasters etc but who knows what the retention is.
you're absolute right, so much garbage propaganda in many languages.
For Apple we have tv news that usually promotes new Apple or OpenAI products (wtf!!) that are trying to tarnish DeepSeek on the privacy level...
No words about all those garbage software siphoning off the web (without respecting neither copyright nor privacy)
Yep: this is face-saving my Sam Altman.

OpenAI has a message they need to tell investors right now: "DeepSeek only works because of our technology. Continue investing in us."

The choice of how they're wording that of course also tells you a lot about who they think they're talking to: namely, "the Chinese are unfairly abusing American companies" is a message that is very popular with the current billionaires and American administration.
Yes, technically and pedantically you are correct.

But restricting the trade in micro chips only because the USA is afraid it will loose a technical and commercial edge is a long long way from a free market.

It is too late, too. China has broken out and they are ahead in many fields. Not trading chips with them will make them build their own foundries. In two decades they will be as far ahead there as they are in many other fields.

If the USA would trade then the technological capacities of China and the USA would stay matched, as they help each other. China ahead in some areas, the USA ahead in others.

That would still (probably) not be a pure Free Market but it would be a freer market, and better for everybody except a few elites (on both sides)

Madness is taking root
I am curious as well.

Despite the "not invented at Google" swipe

* TypeScript wasn't invented at Google either, but adopted heavily.

* Angular was the first major project ever to use TS.

* And interestingly enough, Anders Hejlsberg contributed heavily to both.
Meridian is now available to everyone
>There are two major shifts happening in AI, economically speaking:

You can now spend more $ to get higher accuracy and reliability
Training $ is moving to inference $

>Both are going to drive a massive amount of demand for inference and neither will curtail the demand for more compute. In fact, they will increase the demand for compute.

Is this Nvidia compute or something else?
Would treat your experience as unusual. I understand distrusting reported experiences in favor of your own, but the number of patches that list fixed bugs and stability issues, plus rising satisfaction scores, should guide here.
> they're still a minnow

3K+ employees, $3B+ revenue, ... sure, not BigTech but hardly a minnow. A company that big can chew gum and walk at the same time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotelling%27s_law
Put differently, if I happened to be interested in this SFUSD school as well, is there some list of people like you I should interview?

No, but I can point you to a FB group where you can ask for anyone that faced the same decision before. Some of them will have gone one way, and some the other. You can learn from both.

I'm suggesting that, in absence of some out-of-band signaling mechanism, the expectation value for usefulness of individual feedback is orders of magnitude greater for users than non-users.

This might be true for things that most people don't need (like ski boots) but it's not true for things that most people use, like the post office. That was the point I was making here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42861928

If you got to the post office to find out about people's experience, your sample will be biased: you will mostly be interviewing people who use the post office much more often than the median post office user.

I go to the post office 1-2 times per year. People like me will be both:

- underrepresented in your sample, and

- be the least likely to have adapted to any difficulties getting to know how the post office works

Some folks who are heavy users of parcel services will have stopped using the post office completely. They will be totally unrepresented in your sample, even though you'd like to know why they use UPS instead of USPS.
Linux ended up with seccomp and landlock.

https://docs.kernel.org/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.html

https://docs.kernel.org/userspace-api/landlock.html
It’s been disclosed and resolved. What’s the concern here?
I would argue at least 3 of the 4 you mentioned are the shovels in AI. They are what everyone uses to build AI tools, which is the gold in this analogy. Anyone that offers infrastructure - hardware or software - around building AI is selling shovels IMO. Of course, to complicate things, they all sell applications to the enterprise too, so they’re not pure shovels.

The other 3rd category that are shovels is anything that provides data to LLMs. This include media publishers like Reddit. They definitely are not hard tech.

Anyone that is building any tools or applications whose target market is not companies who are building AI applications, is chasing after gold.
Why is ClickHouse exposing unauthenticated database access at port 9000 to the public? Is this the default behavior or did DeepSeek open it up for dev purposes?
Microsoft had an underlying operating system that they wanted to rewrite substantially in C# on the .NET VM. They had a decent motivation for not having a core piece of Windows dependent on a product from another vendor that was competing in some of the same markets as their core product.

Google by contrast isn't nearly as invested in Dart as Microsoft was (and still is) in C#/.NET. Perhaps a better objection is that they should have just used Go — or a Go-binary-compatible language built on some of the same toolchain. (See also: Vala and Guile still don't play nice together as well as they should for two languages from the same project.)
Waymo's isn't an LLM. Tesla's is supposedly a pure machine learning model.
I'm not sure "irresponsible" is the word. Shouldn't this be, like, punishable by law?
C# was Microsoft's attempt to learn from Java's mistakes, which they very much succeeded at doing.
Yeah this is a surprise to me too - my impression was things like loopback and virtio devices were used explicitly because they don't pretend to ever be real devices, and thus bypass all the real device handling.

What additional overhead is cut out by the netkit approach?
Plus Volkswagen and Subaru in the last few weeks

Both Volkswagen and Subaru have leaked his DNA in the last few weeks? Dude gets around.
The comment isn't wrong, but the implication is at deep seek is somehow special and is getting undue attention from hackers. Any app that skyrockets from nowhere to number one in the app store overnight will have the attention of probably hundreds of thousands of hackers.
That's what i did. It's worked super well. Finding a keyboard i liked that worked with that was the hardest part. As it is my keyboard's brand (Keychron) had support in QMK, but the model did not. I had to hack a bit to get there, but in the end it worked.

Sad thing is that was two years ago and i've forgotten how to flash it lol.

I can't wait until something like Rust's QMK (i think RMK?) starts to work on more boards. My board having complex modes but the ease of it being written in Rust (because i love Rust) would be a dream for me.

If i could i'd write those type of Rust-QMK for both my Keyboard and Mouse. It really feels great
Any chance you'd share the docs for that?
Looks like DeepSeek R1 is a Microsoft shady move against Sam ;]
Legally, I understand your point, but morally, I find it repellent that a breach of contract (especially terms-of-service) could be considered more important than a breach of law. Especially since simply existing in modern society requires us to "agree" to dozens of such "contracts" daily.

I hope voters and governments put a long-overdue stop to this cancer of contract-maximalism that has given us such benefits as mandatory arbitration, anti-benchmarking, general circumvention of consumer rights, or, in this case, blatantly anti-competitive terms, by effectively banning reverse-engineering (i.e. examining how something works, i.e. mandating that we live in ignorance).

Because if they don't, laws will slowly become irrelevant, and our lives governed by one-sided contracts.
We would see it years before, and we would know with certainty years before.

If the object really looked like it might impact I'm sure someone would get time on a powerful telescope to lock in the orbit.
training is either fair use, or it isn't

OpenAI can't have it both ways
BTRFS can handle zoned disks. The doc claims that it was a natural fit with the way BTRFS works.

The problem is that you cannot buy host managed zoned disks.
I get the occasional request to NordVPN image assets beginning with `/nordvpn/media/` on my server. Apparently this is or was a way to find out if an IP address is acting as an exit node.
Putting Websites in QR Codes
edit: snip, misinfo, I'm illiterate. Sorry!
A bunch of ML researchers who were initially hired to do quant work published their first ever user facing project.

So maybe not a side project, but if you have ever worked with ML researchers before, lack of engineering/security chops shouldn't be that surprising to you.
solution: live in a country OpenAI can't get to you

e.g China
It's possible. You just have to use ctes:

with arg_to_bar as (from baz()),
arg_to_foo as (from bar()),
from foo()

Where `arg_to_bar` is a table name used internally in `bar`.