skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
IPFS would be a good layer to build this on top of, but IPFS itself doesn't handle the correspondence between URL and CID. As it is, web DOMs are too variable to handle via content addressing.

This would involve eliminating parts of the page that are unlikely to be stable (i.e. ads, pagination based on screen size, session specific details like usernames), and use that for the CID. That way the only time that users end up storing separate copies of the page is when it has actually been changed substantially. You'd probably also need some code to fluff the normalized content back up into something that makes sense for the device you're reading it on.
So do you not need to work for a living in other countries? Are they giving out high paying jobs in other countries for people who graduated with degrees in Ancient Chinese Art History?
I do work in recruiting. If you let AI making hiring decisions for you, you are an idiot. All it takes is one disgruntled applicant to complain about discrimination in your hiring process to cause you a world of pain. You need to be capable of owning your hiring decisions, meaning you can’t just point to the AI and say “it told me not to hire this person”. You won’t be able to avoid liability when it turns out your AI is biased against some protected class.
> think Jackson Hole would be a great place for Waymo

billionaire class wouldn’t be too happy with getting beta tested on raw tech. They will push back because “NIMBYism” runs deep.
That outside API used to be humans, doing the work manually. Now we have ways to speed that up.
Waymo has deep pockets and an incentive to play it safe. What it doesn't have is fierce competition forcing it to rush. Maybe that will change if/when Amazon's Zoox premiers this year.
But the IP is already "compiled", or if you want to isolate even further, separate just the mask making process. What could be learned from masks?
This may not affect the total demand, but the distribution of demand.
What's also affected, in my opinion:

- individual company valuations

- capacity planning models ("what would it take to do x?") and related funding

- overall competitive landscape (yes you can compete with OpenAI after all without a trillion dollars in funding)

- it's not the coveted high-end GPUs anymore, more affordable/available hardware may also work
But thats exactly what you get when you ask questions that require shifting, specific contextual knowledge. The model weights, by their nature, cannot encode that information.

At best, you can only try to layer in contextual info like this as metadata during inference, akin to how other prompting layers exist.

Even then, what up-to-date information should present for every round-trip is a matter of opinion and use-case.
how are they "more trustworthy"? after all, it's data on a flash on the drive board.

is it lack of tooling, as demonstrated by needing the last smartmontools version to even read them, or some protection in the firmware to prevent resetting them (hey, no legit business resetting the power-on hours to zero...).

I checked the recertified ironwolf 12TB drives I bought, and both SMART and FARM report times in line with when I installed them in my nas. Of course, since they're recertified by seagate themselves, they may very well have a backdoor to reset FARM.
Isn't this what Britain did to New South Wales sending prisoners to colony populating it all with convicts?
Interesting. I wonder if this is related to the model architecture and attention mechanism.

The author seems to be implying it could be: "Even a single mention of ‘code enhancement suggestions’ in our instructions seemed to hijack the model’s attention"
A counter-point on procedural generation; Elite Dangerous did the same, but it worked. e.g. Watching a ringed planet eclipse a pulsar was awe inspiring. It had countless incredible combinations of procedurally generated stars & planets you could discover.
But microsoft is one of their backers?
I hope Spotify UX teams reached this.
not to seem pedantic but the self driving system isn't an LLM, it's probably using an artificial neural network for some aspects like object recognition (and would have similar issues like need large amounts of data) , but the similarity ends there.
There's a big difference. The membership of these classes is determined in the worst case - so if there is no polynomial time solution in the worst case then it's NP.

For this problem we don't care if it's possible that sometimes there are things that aren't verifiable, or the answers aren't exact, we just need training signal.
I feel exactly the same about it.

SublimeText is where I go to take some notes I want to write unformatted, or with some markdown.

It's where I go to paste some blob of JSON or logs from a random command that I want to parse out into something more readable than my terminal gave me.

It's where I write a random snippet of code to help someone who's asking me a question, or a bash script for a one-off job.

It's not my IDE and I don't want it to replace my IDE, just like I don't want my leatherman tool or swiss army knife to replace my power drill or pliers.
What's really annoying is how its idea of "polishing" is just making the email worse. Who could possibly benefit from the recipient needing to sift through more boilerplate to find the actual content of the email?

15 years ago I might have imagined that an email sent by a robot would be extremely efficient, including only the relevant information, in order of importance. In 2025 it's apparently the opposite; we're trying our best to communicate effectively and an AI is nagging us to include an extra paragraph of flirtation.
He started off wealthy from his dad's blood emerald enterprise. Then he really took off buying into PayPal, a middle man service for making secure money transactions online. Literally got rich off the dot-com boom. That is textbook definition of right place, right time.

Every tech company he owns, he bought. He doesn't do any of the engineering. The only genius he possesses is in creating public hype for products he has invested in. It is 100% persona.
I looked up this Brownstein protocol and the first result is the FTC taking action against the guy for making false medical claims by making up a crazy vitamin protocol and falsely advertising it as a way to prevent or cure coronavirus.
> As far as we can tell [...] the phish spam attacker used the main password they'd just stolen to register the person for our VPN and obtain a VPN password...

Requiring admin approval for VPN accounts would have prevented the phisher from getting VPN access to begin with.
I hear you can perform an incantation transforming 4 Amiga1000s into 1 Amiga4000.
this isn't really about gangs
This is just plainly and grossly misinformed.

Immigration rates, and their children come no where close to affecting regular educational metrics.

The reading comprehension is just that bad, and the people in the know understand why it is that way but bureaucracy props it up while everyone waits for Superman.
Historic asteroid samples contain ingredients crucial for life
np! I also posted a link to Charlie's Bluesky cross-post, which you can read without logging in to anything: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42870359
I understand the temptation to go there, but I think it misses the point. I have no qualms at all with the idea that the sum total of intelligence distributed across the internet was siphoned away from creators and piped through an engine that now cynically seeks to replace them. Believe me, I will grab my pitchfork and march side by side with you.

But let's keep the eye on the ball for a second. None of that changes the fact that what was built was a capability to reflect that knowledge in dynamic and deep ways in conversation, as well as image and audio recognition.

And did Deepseek also build that? From scratch? Because they might not have.
News outlets rely on you scrolling down the whole article so they can show you more ads.
This is much more nuanced now. See Apple "Private Cloud Compute": https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/ ; they run a lot of the larger models on their own servers.

Fundamentally it is more efficient to process a batch of tokens from multiple users/requests than processing them from a single user's request on device.
The poster asked if you played the game, and acknowledged that you don't have to like it - that's not a fallacy, it's a clarifying question.

The game has had clearly observable and measurable improvements, in terms of features, like multi-player, but also in terms of overall content, game and storyline components, and substantial new and revised game mechanics.

It is abundantly clear from player feedback that your opinion is in the minority.

Steam reviews -
Recent Reviews:
Very Positive (1,837)
All Reviews:
Very Positive (256,838)
The game has actually consistently been on Steam’s yearly top seller list for many years.

It’s surprising to see its continued popularity and development. In a good way of course!
I've loaded Cyanogenmod on the HTC Incredible 1 & 2, and the BN Nook color.

I've loaded Lineage on the Nexus 6, Oneplus 3a & 5 & Nord N200, the original Pixel, and the Pixel 3a XL.

Pixels are the most forgiving, and the hardest to brick. They are also the best for VoLTE.

I also have an N100, which is not supported by Lineage.
The example story is interesting.

I have made my own implementation from scratch with my own multi-channel tokeniser, each channel gets its own embedding table 32768, 256,256, 64, and 4. Which are summed along with the position encoding.

Yet with all of those differences, my stories have Lily as a protagonist often enough that I thought I had a bug somewhere.

Might have to check tinystories for name distribution.

Most questionable output from mine so far:

"one day, a naughty man and a little boy went to the park place to find some new things."
"Then use R1 output to build a better X1" is the part I'm not sure about. Is X1 going to actually be better than R1?
Paper Apps GOLF – How to play [video]
Shallow is the observation of many, many people who usually just get ignored, or worse in today's vote-centered social media platforms, suppressed, for going against the popular narrative.

If it's true that not liking something doesn't make it bad, then liking something also doesn't make it good.
Yes. Both dotcoms and housing still bring immense profits to investors.
I know nil of the social sciences. What are the necessary conditions to start a cult? Seems like big rock flying thru space ominously could qualify!
There isn't a "the pipeline". You'd have to work at DeepSeek for your low-level work to affect it.
The US ruled that AI produced things are by themself not copyrightable.

So no, it doesn't belong to OpenAI.

You might be able to sue for penalties for breach of contract of the TOS, but that doesn't give them the right to the model. And even if it doesn't give them any right to invalidate unbound copyright grants they have given to 3rd parties (here literally everyone). Nor does it prevent anyone from training their own new models based on it or prevent anyone from using it. Oh, and the one breaching the TOS might not even have been the company behind DeepSeek but some in-between 3rd party.

Naturally this is under a few assumptions:

- the US consistently applies it's own law, but they have a long history of not doing so

- the US doesn't abuse their power to force their economical opinions (ban DeepSeek) on other countries

- it actually was trained on OpenAI, but uh, OpenAI has IMHO shown over the years very clearly that they can't be trusted and they are fully in-transparent. How do we trust their claim? How do we trust them to not retrospectively have tweaked their model to make it look as if DeepSeek copied it?
Even assuming the model was somehow publicly available in a form that could be directly copied, that would be a more blatant form of copyright infringement. Distillation launders copyrighted material in a way that OpenAI specifically has argued falls under fair use.
It is a fair comparison. Normal programming takes inputs and a function and produces outputs. Deep learning takes inputs and outputs and derives a functions. Of course the decompilers for traditional programs do not work on inputs and outputs, it is a different paradigm!
I was referring to the "tens of thousands" part, I make no assumption on whether a company will give you a job or not based on your degree, that is always variable.
How many developer jobs are due to startups? I can't imagine enough to really affect the job market all that much. There's a lot of people out there looking.

>> It may not be caused by AI, but it is going to affect hiring numbers from now on.

> That remains to be seen. I can say with high confidence that we did not have tech that was capable of reducing the need for engineers from 2022 to 2024. It's hard to predict the future.

If I can run some small models locally which helps me significantly right now, I don't really think it is hard to make the jump to needing fewer engineers overall. I've seen people paying for the big models do even more.
Not for geopolitical stability, though. What did we learn about making the entirety of human civilization dependent on a constant supply of rare materials hostile countries dig out of the ground?

And what happens when they run out? Back to carbon fossil fuels?
FP8 DeepSeek R1 Distilled LLMs for SGLang and VLLM
That is impossible. There's several layers deep of sole suppliers for them.
Sure, as a mental model- it's wrong but has value when it comes to communicating effectively to an audience. Specialist communication within a domain implies a shared narrative and context, so can focus on granular details (facts). Generalist communication across domains and up or down the status hierarchy always requires storytelling, to establish context, before presenting any facts.

So people themselves have to do both, what and how they emphasize depends on the specific domain and circumstance.

Pro tip: if you think of yourself as fact based, work to understand what narratives form your grounding fabric for fact interpretation, so much so that you don't even think about it.
My problem with the NMS debacle was that they lied egregiously when building hype about the game's features and just continued to lie and evade when it all came crashing down. I played the game a year or two ago, overall it wasn't bad, a middling sandbox crafting game, but there are way more games than I have time to play, so I'd prefer to patron those with a more honest approach.
I don't know what their policy is now, but they talk about it in the Hot Chips 2024 presentation.

I myself just have proof of a single customer having their own private Cerebras rack. There are rumors about several more customers with on-prem Cerebras.
The "evidence" is very weak though:

>The San Francisco-based ChatGPT maker told the Financial Times it had seen some evidence of “distillation”, which it suspects to be from DeepSeek.

Given that many people have been using ChatGPT to distill their fine-tunes for a few years now, how can they be sure it was specifically DeepSeek? There's, say, glaive.ai whose entire business model is to sell you synthetic datasets, probably generated with ChatGPT as well.
So, which of them 3?
The aim is to support both incremental ongoing type checking via something like an LSP server, and also batch type checking for use in e.g. CI.

> The entire system is designed to be highly incremental so that it can eventually power a language server (e.g., only re-analyze affected files on code change).

https://bsky.app/profile/crmarsh.com/post/3lgvhzeawuc26
Are you... is this the micro-bus?
The decline was inevitable from the get go, centralized systems fall to ruin and when they are unable to self-regulate you need to dissolve and start fresh.

There are points of no return in systems, after which cascading problems prevent any future resolution.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3263007/
Even without iodized salt, Japan is one of the highest consumers of iodine worldwide. [1]

But I agree. Even though iodized salt is pointless in Japan, so is the law banning it (assuming OP is correct, and it is in fact banned).

[1]: https://anaturalhealingcenter.com/documents/Thorne/articles/...
Pretext my statement with "historically, until the last 5 years or so" and it still stands. TikTok is definitely influential, there's no arguing that.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42869403
Thanks to neoliberal economic theory, the public CEOs must deliver shareholder value at all costs! In this lens, they are doing “great”

But actual company itself and products are bleeding internally from decades of mismanagement.
> I think it would cast doubt on the narrative "you could have trained o1 with much less compute, and r1 is proof of that"

Whether or not you could have, you can now.
Yep! Emmo explains those blood test numbers like a pro all biomarkers have their little page with explained what they are and their range but you can also chat w emmo to learn more.
As someone without X or Bluesky, this link shows whole thread while X does not.
source: the "The Analysis" section of your own source or if you needed it stated more explicitly [0]:

> Before judging whether that’s impressive or excessive or some other adjective, it’s helpful to know what the available pool of new workers looked like. Or, more precisely, what the pool of new workers minus the pool of departing workers looked like. Net change is what we’re able to see.

i'm sure this will have precisely 0 impact on your worldview though

0: https://archive.is/POQnF#selection-1715.156-1715.449
I can't? I am going to make that accusation if we're talking about the govt of China.
I lost mine yesterday -_+
have to buy a new one I guess

pure evil
Oh this post...calling out DeepSeek's T&C but not comparing it with OpenAI's is really disingenuous IMO.
Agree with most of this (not the weird anti-immigrant bit but the rest), however China does have some foreign requirements that are a bit of a pain in the ass, like its insistence that Taiwan isn't a country. They also don't like it and will retaliate when you point out the shady shit it does (e.g. the Uighurs), but then thats no different from the states especially under its current toddler administration.
The implication is clear even if formulated as a question. Let's not pretend here.

Asking people if they've played the game (or "read the article") is also directly against the HN guidelines.
> I did not think this, nor did I think this was what others assumed.

That's what I thought and assumed. This is the narrative that's been running through all the major news outlets.

It didn't even occur to me that DeepSeek could have been training their models using the output of other models until reading this article.
If you think it's bad now, imagine how bad it was for those of us that pre-ordered it. It was a dadgum mess back then.

Most people are warming up to this game because they're delivering on the original game concept and still going the extra mile. No Man's Sky was criticized at launch because the gameplay was nothing like the trailer had suggested, and the updates since launch have really and truly fixed that complaint.

No, there isn't EVA in space or serious FPS combat or even well tuned space dogfights. But none of that was really part of the original promise, and looking at the utterly derelict state of games that try to thread all those needles (cough cough, Star Citizen), I'm glad No Man's Sky went it's own way.
Because sometimes Bias is true, but is socially undesirable, so we all agree to act as if it were not true.

We expect computers to act as the world should be, rather than as it is, because we fear that not doing so will perpetuate things.
You may have autism. I felt for a very long time that all other people, when investigating something, were on a journey with me to try and find the truth together. This is valuable in many ways, as I've always been able to ask questions other people find 'difficult'. But after 35-40 years I learned that many people value group membership or genuinely think a 'personal truth' that is distinct from 'what actually happened' truth is equally valid. I think NTs perhaps understand this intuitively. Personally, I was horrified.

If that resonates, maybe look up some secondary traits and see if you have those, and if you feel you want a second opinion to identify the condition, pursue a diagnosis.
>It's still a walking simulator.

I don't know how many different ways to say it. We all enjoy different types of games! You obviously aren't a fan of sandbox games, lots of people aren't either. Or maybe it's just this sandbox game. That's fine too.

But it is pretty objectively a great example of taking an absolutely abysmal launch and turning it into something that a decent amount of people (doesn't mean everyone!) still enjoy and talk favorably about. It still sells copies. It still keeps the lights on at Hello Games.

I cannot think of a single other game that had such an awful launch that has, 10 years later, enjoyed mostly positive reviews. Cyberpunk might be the closest.
Have you tried beartype? It's worked well for me and has the least overhead of any other runtime type checker.

https://github.com/beartype/beartype
Japanese freezing company website hacked, list of Wikipedia scandals posted
It also runs quite well on a 24GB MacBook, which is nowadays more or less the base configuration unless you go out of your way to buy a suffixless-CPU MacBook Pro.
> it uses salsa from rust for incremental type checking

This is true! We're also contributing salsa features upstream where we can, e.g. https://github.com/salsa-rs/salsa/pull/603
ChatGPT can't provide answers on any current events because it has to be updated first.
Something is off about that number. They have a population of 10,000 and an operating budget of 1.3 billion. It can't cost them half a million per inmate.
I feel your use of TeX (or whatever that notation is precisely ...) is far too clear.

Possibly use InChI instead, so instead of "$HPO_{4}^{2−}$", use "InChI=1S/H3O4P/c1-5(2,3)4/h(H3,1,2,3,4)/p-2". Or, more concisely, just use the key, which is "NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-L". :)

(from : https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/searchId.do?chebiId=43474)
> downward trend ... sodium was seen as bad

Excess sodium intake is associated with cardiovascular disease and heart failure. Salt is also an opportunistic carrier for iodine supplementation. So to call it good or bad, you'd need to either come up with an epidemiological study of the two diseases relative to each other, or maybe propose an alternative carrier for the iodine supplementation.
What's happening at home? From a foreigner's (Canadian) perspective, Trump's not doing anything crazy but the media is going crazy...

Our Prime Minister has multiple scandals worse than anything Trump has done so far... From groping a reporter to multiple instances of blackface to firing the attorney general because she investigated a company who gave bribes to Moammar Gaddafi to nearly a billion dollars going to a 2 person software consulting firm to fake charities giving him and his family members millions of dollars and much more. Yet somehow we're held up as an example of democracy and the US, which defends democracy all over the world somehow isn't...
When I saw these numbers back in the initial o3-ARC post, I immediately converted them into "$ per ARC-AGI-1 %" and concluded we may be at a point where each increased increment of 'real human-like novel reasoning' gets exponentially more compute costly.

If Mike Knoop is correct, maybe R1 is pointing the way toward more efficient approaches. That would certainly be a good thing. This whole DeepSeek release and the reactions have shown by limiting the export to China of high-end GPUs, the US incentivized China to figure out how to make low-end GPUs work really well. The more subtle meta-lesson here is that the massive flood of investment capital being shoved toward leading edge AI companies has fostered a drag race mentality which prioritized winning top-line performance far above efficiency, costs, etc.