skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's a tradeoff! You have to explore both options to know which side of the tradeoff to take.
Two questions:

1) Which search engine comes with infallible information?
2) Where are LLMs being sold as something different?
> From my experience, the vast majority of complications in systems is people not realizing they are asking an OLAP question while wanting parts of OLTP semantics.

If you could elaborate on this further, I and others are probably very interested in reading more about it.
Bravo, very good questions in the socratic method.

Christianity has so deeply penetrated our society that we don't even notice it's precepts anymore. It's like the air we breathe. It's so prevalent, it's become invisible to our eyes.
Unless you can quantify what you mean by “meaningful” then it won’t be possible. It can’t read your mind.
> Perhaps this is why our generation often approaches technology with a mix of fluency and skepticism

This resonates with me, as I was just last night telling a friend about the grift that is “the singularity”. Remember that? The tech bros were really concerned about that for a hot moment, then their stock went up… …but nobody seems worried about the singularity anymore.
The same - your “revealed preference” is different from your “stated preference”.

Is that the point you were trying to make?
Sure, but can you also win the case ;)?

On the bottom of ChatGPT.com I see a disclaimer: “ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info”.

I don’t think you can succesfully sue with such caveat emptor.
I use libreoffice just like regular old office, once every few years I get a major update when I update my distro, it's fine too.
what are some good self-hosted blog alternatives? something with features similar to ghost/substack
Union predates the legal ban on striking, and still represents employees, even though their actual power has been significantly neutered.
People be now thinking that calculators should go to heaven, for all the good they brought upon us.
In Minecraft/Terraria/Subnautica, I can actually do something with the new equipment. Go to new places, fight new enemies, conquer new bosses.

In No Man' Sky, it's already all there. In fact 10 minutes into the game I was crafting a wooden shed right next to a busy alien base with constant spaceship traffic. Can I interact with them instead? Can there be any storyline involving the sci-fi base right next to me? No, like most of the game it is just for show. You are supposed to look at the pretty scenery and ignore it while do the most boring crafting game ever. Those two aspects are not connected at all.
Honestly, if the world isn't looking pretty dark to you right now, I think you're the one who needs to go outside a little bit more. Especially since this drift into right wing extremism can still be stopped, both in the USA and in Europe, but only for a few more years.
AIs and Robots Should Sound Robotic
I don't believe DeepSeek crashed Nvidia's stock
Reminds me of one of my favorite ST: TNG episodes, "The Measure of a Man" - I urge anyone who read this note to watch this episode.

Ultimately it comes down to the question of whether machines, regardless of how smart they can be made to appear, even if they pass the Turing test with flying colors, are imbued with a soul.

In the episode, the Enterprise JAG officer, questions whether we humans "have souls."

C.S. Lewis felt that our souls transcend time/are immortal, whereas our bodies are temporal (https://checkyourfact.com/2019/09/18/fact-check-cs-lewis-sou...).

What we call "AI", is created in our image, e.g. training the model defines its range/category of responses.

We humans, if you'll believe it, are created in our Creator's image. By Creator, I do not mean our parents here.

FFT - what do you believe?
No, because my revealed preference is the same as my stated preference…
State of Java report shows strong migration from Java 8, rise of Apache Spark
"Will I ever use this in the real world?" (2016)
It’s not your testing environment, it’s the payment processor’s, and you don’t really know what it may or may not be lacking.
The "Hiring Freeze" seems to clearly and explicitly exclude cases like this. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/hiri...
video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WlCfuPrszU -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4nP9jcFBJQ
I could be wrong here, I'm not an expert with databases, but I believe -- this is a belief, please help me disconfirm it if you think it is wrong -- that CitusDB's approach that shards Postgres across redundant mirrors, should successfully scale horizontally for OLTP without sacrificing consistency.
How many examples would you like (serious, I can provide as many as you want)? Here's the last 24 hours:

'Miserable self-loathing poser': NeuroVigil CEO's open letter on ex-friend Musk

https://bsky.app/profile/brainking.bsky.social/post/3lgsco7c...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42874207

Coalition of Jewish groups say they're leaving X over Musk's behavior

https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/jewish-groups-leaving-x-mus...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42855399

Trump to sign order opening detention camp at Guantanamo Bay for 30k migrants

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politic...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42871252

Trump to cancel student visas of pro-Palestinian protesters

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-administration-cancel...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42871547

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42862048
What it means is that the aircraft was on approach into runway 1 (ILS) and then on ATC instruction changed runway to 33 (no ILS). This required a "jog" in flight path -- a slight right turn followed by a left turn, to account for the different orientation between the runways. You can see the turns on the ADS data. Crash happened right at the end of the second turn.
Why the dislikes decision was one of YouTube's most harmful, and how to fix it
This also led to the fact that people without seeing the counter began to rate videos much less, and Google untied video promotion from comments and dislikes even earlier, so now these are just useless buttons ...
Well, in 2021, dislikes were removed and this was the decision that most users perceived negatively. Three years have passed and I see how content has degraded in IT, mathematics, and scientific fields. Only normal channels remain, working by inertia. The worst thing is that it is impossible to understand how bad this video is if you are not an expert (but then why are you watching it?).

The most surprising thing is that the stated problem was then solved in much more progressive ways, here are some of them:
1. Forbid users to put reactions if they did not watch the video at least 20% (oops! and bot farms would become less effective.)
2. Use YouTube algorithms to search for bots, unjustified raids on young users.
3. Forbid deleting comments (this should be highlighted in bold, because many do not know that the author of the channel can delete comments and ban users). YouTube algorithms have already learned to find unreasonable criticism or something that contradicts their censorship)))

Why haven't users done anything about this yet (Return Dislike is there, but after closing to YouTube API, their rating is too inaccurate...)?
Would love to hear more from you on this — why do you feel self-custody is a concern? For context, we're using Privy (https://docs.privy.io/guide/security/), which encrypts (and never stores) the private keys, and users simply log in with email/phone etc. auth (so no need for key management).
Carbon is a similar class in the PHP world that's inherited from DateTime. This gives a good description of how working with mutable timestamps can cause problems, because methods like $newInstance = $instance->addDay() modify the original instance and return it, rather than returning a copy that's a day later:

https://carbon.nesbot.com/docs/

So it's best to mostly use CarbonImmutable so that a new instance is always returned, which works better for higher-order programming style that's closer to pure functional programming. I do wish that Carbon was immutable by default, with CarbonMutable as a fallback when necessary, but it's too late for them to change it now.

I could see a project using use..as statements and/or aliases in config/app.php (edit: in Laravel) to import CarbonImmutable and Carbon as aliases like CRBN and CRBNMUT respectively, so that code works as intended without monkey patching or otherwise swapping the classnames and losing code portability.
If you don't need components on the bottom side, it saves money to not do so. That means the board doesn't need to go through another pass on the SMT machine.

Even if a board is double-sided, it is common to avoid putting major ICs on both sides, unless the space constraints are severe. Often, people will only put passive components on the bottom side.
In trading, it's illegal to do a test trade in production on most regulated exchanges. Making a trade with no intrinsic economic motivation is considered market manipulation and will be punished by the regulator.

It's also illegal not to do such a test trade. Operating a trading system that hasn't been validated under production conditions is reckless behaviour that will be punished by a different arm of the same regulator.

Payments processing seems to be in a similar situation. It's bad practice to test in production, but it's even worse practice not to test in production.
You example doesn't show this. Also the allocation is hoisted out of the loop. The initialization is not and this would be invalid in general. It could eliminated in this case, but this would be dead store elimination.
The magic of bisect is that you rule out half of your remaining commits every time you run it. So even if you have 1000 commits, it takes at most 10 runs. An n-bisect wouldn't be that much faster, it could be slower because you will not always be able to rule out half your commits.
Hi, would you be available to share some feedback about the process & tooling? I'm comparing tools for my needs and would love to ask you for details. I can be reached at david [at] linkurio [dot] us
This kind of thing absolutely needs to end. Especially for public schools. Requiring you do business with a specific commercial entity just so you can get a message from your government definitely crosses a line, and you were 100% right to advocate that they change.
That's fair, reading it did not come off as introspection to me. I could probably have taken it less seriously. Opinion generally ties into attitude so I'm going to assume that persons musings will reflect in how they act.
I make a unique email address (on my domain) for every mailing list and account I sign up for, where each address forwards to its own IMAP folder. This way, I effectively have an individual inbox for every correspondent, so I can easily spot new messages from senders I particularly care about - but it's all conveniently available through a single login.
So it seems like this was actually 7 M2 Ultras, not 2, so .0028 kWh?
It proves they stand above the competition, across all levels, selected by AAA studios that keep delivering across the industry.

They should know a couple of things about how to deliver something into production.

Additionally influencers complaining about them, usually never even wrote a basic hello world, let alone understand how memory management works.
Yes, by "lens" I meant a possibly large stack of optical elements, each designed to perform a single computational step. Kind of like layers of an NN, but etched on sheets of plastic.

Thanks for finding the proper term for this!
Mid-2024.There was no kerfuffle, except in the minds of those who like the authors of thos article had ulterior motives.
Wrong. Trading time for a good or service is simply not what the revealed preferences theory has evidence to demonstrate. You are jumping to a baseless conclusion. If it’s free, it’s not covered in revealed preference theory, by definition.
I tried just a few of the code generating prompts I have used last days, and it looks quite good and promising. It seems at least on par with qwen2.5-coder-32b which was the first local model i would actually use for code. I am also surprised how far we went with small models producing such more polished output in the last year.

On another note, I also wish they would follow up with a new version of the 8x7B mixtral. It was one of my favourite models, but at the time it could barely fit in my ram, and now that I have more ram it is rather outdated. But I don't complain, this model anyway is great and it is great that they are one of the companies which actually publish such models targeted to edge computing.
Goose – an open-source, extensible AI agent that goes beyond code suggestions
Well, last night when there were only 10 comments here, the essentials of what had happened were available from those comments. Meanwhile the mainstream news TV I was watching at the same time was presenting either zero information, or false information (e.g. that 4 survivors had been rescued).
This is racist and unacceptable - please delete this comment.
A collection of Polish match labels from 1949-83
Submissions now open for AIFF 2025
I think you'd have to hack it together on a per-project basis, but could you do it with containers? You'd have to identify the point where the build process diverges, make n copies of the container...

(If I'm understanding you correctly).

But there's not much that's faster than a binary search.
Clarifying the Creation and Use of the FrontierMath Benchmark
Someone still needs to communicate to the computer exactly what they want and the computer has to understand that. So far, that has been tried unsuccessfully many times, and I don't see that changing with AI
In the case of ARC they are referring to verifiable math and reasoning problems. They still used SFT and model-based rewards for other domains.
Why is a Blackhawk helicopter Performing a “training flight” at night very close to DCA?
And usually likes and dislikes show real quality of the video. Bots attacks have been seldom, I think here YouTube lied a little bit:)
The first idea on how to reach Google is to write negative reviews in the App Store and PlayMarket and not use the app.
It's a bummer that there's a whole generation that doesn't know how much fun it was for everyone to watch and discuss the same episode of the same show at the same time week to week.

And yeah, now imagine everyone watching their own personalized media. Under the surface it's so empty.
So, what is the replacement then?
Yes, the ODAs. I'm not making a value judgement that this is good, bad, or indifferent. I'm just trying to provide factual context to understand when and why the delegation of certain aspects of certification has occurred.
Dude, you're writing so much but not even reading. You write "But ok: try signing up for any service with SMS-based 2FA required; banks come to mind, many other online services."

I literally wrote in the first comment you replied to "But that just requires any cellphone that can text, and cell phones have been common for 25 years. Are there some specific examples of where you have to have a smartphone?" - and then you just give another example that just requires texting...
Why the future of talent recruitment is meritocratic
> < you are here

Your guesses about me are hilariously wrong.

Ex: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42850668 , https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42850761, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42816654

So trim those excessive confidence levels, and consider what you might change to improve your process.
I'll add that 5-10 years is exactly when I started thinking about school again and decided to go for a graduate degree. I went to grad school for my own reasons and paid for it myself, partially to fend off boot camp and junior developers, but much more importantly to empower myself and learn how to solve more challenging problems.

I agree though, don't overthink the degree unless you need a specific accreditation like ABET or something medical.
Do you have a computer? What does it not do that you need? I am not an expert of any sort but I have seen lots of people (and myself) buy equipment (computers, tools, bicycles, etc) and not use but a fraction of the capabilities or have to go out and but something else because it was the wrong thing.
What models would you recommend for basic classification if you don't need a 24B parameter one?
I feel you’ve gone on a tangent there. Particularly your unrelated comment about using of using ML because people are too lazy to write parsers.

That all said, I don’t really disagree with any of your individual points. But teemoji is clearly not meant to be considered a serious tool so I wouldn’t be too critical of UNIX that this tool exists.
QuickTime only plays h.264/265 videos encoded in very specific ways, and a very limited set of other codecs.

Most h.264/265 files in the wild, QuickTime won't play. You have to repackage them with a couple of specific flags using ffmpeg.

QuickTime is great for playing videos produced by Apple devices, but terrible at playing media generally.
The data pipeline to build the weights is the source. The weights are a binary. The term is being hijacked. Just call it open weights, not open source models. The source for the models is not available. The weights are openly available.
Qwen2.5-VL: State-of-the-art multimodal LLM
As long as your test suite just finds and runs all files in a given folder (without needing to explicitly "enable" them in some index file), this should work:

- create a NEW test file in `some/path/to/test.ext` (and back it up outside repo just in case)

- do NOT commit it in the repo

- `git bisect`

That way, bisect would check out different commits, but without touching `some/path/to/test.ext` because it's not tracked by git.

It could be also helpful to make git not see some file changes through the diff/status:

`git update-index --assume-unchanged path/to/some/file`

to trick git into thinking the file didn't change.
(Although when you checkout a commit which did modify that file, this would crash).
Evidence?

Take just the easiest to measure of those factors, wealth. Per your hypothesis, wealthier men should have more babies. Do you have any evidence that wealthier men have more babies?

In fact, it's quite the opposite. There is a strong inverse correlation between wealth and number of babies. Both globally [1] and in the US [2]. There is some data that you can seek out that will suggest the trend is reversed in some first-world countries in the past couple of years, but that's no where near enough time to draw conclusions.

Is there real evidence that men with greater "health" (besides the obvious, of, say, having a crippling disease) or "reputation" have more children?

I'm sorry, but this sounds like "women only chose alpha males" junk to me.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_and_fertility

2. https://www.statista.com/statistics/241530/birth-rate-by-fam...
A teenager today probably feels compelled to be on social media in order to be socially relevant.
Problem in a nutshell, excellent.
Michael Everson
Not enough information is absolutely a correct answer to the use of "likely". "Neither one is likely" would also be correct. Options abound beyond "pick the one in whatever demographic group you want."
It wouldn't cost tens of millions of dollars to create a 500m or 1b, and the process of learning is transferrable to larger model weights.
Baseball Radar Gun Plugs into an iPhone
> the entire human person is simultaneously both material and spiritual... the human person transcends the material world through the soul... the human spirit does not exercise its normal mode of knowledge without the body

I have a hard time wrapping my head around exactly what it is that Christians believe about immortality. So the soul lives on forever, but without the reasoning and intellectual capabilities granted by the corporeal form? It's hard for me to imagine what that would be like. Just a beatific, glowing consciousness basking in God's light for all eternity, with no thoughts or conceptions or knowledge or memory or reasoning?

That sounds like a pretty limited vision of immortality. I wonder if the average Catholic gives this much thought.
Honestly a lot of those recordings probably do sound a lot worse than the radio audio. I rarely see YouTube recordings that are as audible as the radio is in person. Here's what seems to be the reason:

The common splitters you can buy to break out your headset connector to a recorder don't account for the signal level, which is very high on the headset connectors as aviation headsets are traditionally pretty high impedance. I've struggled with the headset audio blowing out even a fairly nice recorder (a Zoom) with the gain turned all the way down. Phones and pocket reporters don't even offer a gain adjustment and the recording can end up almost unusable. In a lot of YouTube videos of pilots, even most, it's pretty obvious that it's clipping at the recorder the whole time. Perhaps even worse, a lot of people are using like a GoPro with auto-gain, so you get the worst of both worlds: it ramps up gain until the noise is loud, and then when someone starts talking, it ramps down the gain, but a little too slowly, and it's still clipping even when it hits minimum.

It's not very common to have trouble understanding the controller when in the air. AM radio at line of sight (as is the case when you're flying) is pretty robust. Maybe the hardest thing to understand are helicopter pilots because there's often rotor noise on their end.
Scaling Laws: O1 Pro Architecture, Reasoning Training Infrastructure, "Failures"
maybe off topic, but I never got the gist of Product Hunt.

Isn't it solutionism? Who goes in search of products to try out?

I only see the appeal from builders that want inspiration or people who want to network, usually neither makes for a good user.

Are there people who go to product hunt when they have a problem and want a solution? Or people who have excess budget and look around to see where they can spend their money?
This whole thread is basically "People who refuse to use technology that has been commonplace for 25 years". Not that they can't use that technology, or that it's unavailable (where I live there are a bunch of programs that give free cellphones to homeless people because it's such a valuable tool for them), but that they just refuse to.

So? I mean bully for them I guess, but why should anyone else care?
Yet another link aggregation site – Looking for sources for consideration
Built yet another link aggregation site.
Feel free to submit sources via the about page.
Lambo (all sport cars) owners tend to take speed limits as suggestions, it might actually be going twice as fast if not legally, still people being driven around, would prefer a Rolls.

Rolls and Bentley are normally driven slower than even regular cars like high end sedans, they are big and unwieldy, and their passengers really care about ride quality, the scene from parasite about coffee cup comes to mind.

If you had the money to own either car, you are rich enough that whenever you reach the destination is on time, other people work on your schedule, then speed becomes less important.
How to Give the Best Handshake
Thanks, I think so too by the looks of his channel, I'll get in touch!
I hope this moves the masses from closed models to open models.
looks like a markov chain lol
Quaternions and spherical trigonometry
Probably, but that pilot was it seems operating within a very risky environment (being able to see and avoid a plane in the dark in a place with many such planes and other lighted objects) that with hindsight should not have existed. I'd certainly never have flown on a plane into DCA if I had known that military helicopters were routinely buzzing around in the same airspace with no technological deconfliction aids.
Why is F2 still the key to edit cells in Excel instead of spacebar? (2021)