skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I got very interested in RDF about 20-25 years ago.

Obviously it did not really succeeded but it seems some industries invested a lot into the tech and it is still around.
Especially since AWS built a service around it.

I am really curious, what are the top use cases for it today?
>No, this boils down to "it is bad for even billionaires to be terrified of opposing the new President". Who has, for the record, previously called for Zuck's imprisonment.

That's a total 180 from the OP and most of this comment thread, which was seemingly about excoriating meta/zuck's behavior.
> And this is where Rust differs; Rust will reduce the likelihood of bugs from happening in the first place. I'm not saying Zig doesn't also do that, Rust just does it more.

I'd argue that it does this a LOT more. When it comes to spatial safety, Rust and Zig are on par. However in terms of temporal safety I think Zig lags far behind Rust... along with basically every other compiled systems language.

If you had to come up with a single good reason to use Rust over Zig, it would definitely be temporal safety. A majority of applications don't need this though, or can be designed such that they don't.

One of my main issues with Rust is that it makes it easy to write spaghetti code that uses reference counting all over the place. I don't recommend people to use Rust until they become a "N+1 programmer" that Casey Muratori describes as "grouped element thinking" [1]. At this point, most of that programmers problems are solved and suddenly the Zig vs Rust debate becomes much more nuanced.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xt1KNDmOYqA
Right. The risetime of the pulses determines how far out the useful comb lines extend (at least that's how it works in the RF world).

Being able to go from IR to UV in one comb spectrum was considered a very worthwhile advance when it happened. Now you can apparently buy a single box that does it, such as the one mentioned in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42890578 . But you have to ask for the price, and usually I find that if I have to ask, I needn't have bothered. :-P
> 4. Journalism is in a battle with the current administration

Is this controversial?
Very funny.

But no. Only a very, very small percentage of drug users want hallucinations.

Hallucinations happen usually, when something went bad.

(So a hallucinating LLM giving drug advice might as well result in real hallucination of the user, but also a permanent kidney damage)
Kalshi, an Online Prediction Market, Will Open Its Bets to Brokerages
>Note: you and your children are more likely to be killed by a car in an American suburb than even be remotely harmed in any way by a stranger in NYC.

I spit out my drink reading this. You're delusional.
Somewhere there’s a graph that went boop just enough to get someone a promotion, a raise, or a bonus.
Not an accountant but this is my understanding as well
Too late. Tesla has set the example of removing the turn signal and drive selector stalks. I believe there is a law that the emergency flashers need a physical control, which is why teslas have a dedicated button.
Health Resources Vanish Following DEI and Gender Orders
I think it goes beyond that. When we say animals learn and humans in particular generate new knowledge by exploration, it's not just system I versus system II thinking. You might legitimately not be able to answer question just by thinking at all. You have to go out in the world and find the answer. It might be as simple and walking around a building to see what's on the other side or it might as complicated as spending a few thousand years learning to build particle accelerators and sensors that can infer what is happening at a subatomic level in these, but you can't just "generate" an answer with sheer brainpower.

This is a lot older than Kahneman. It's the classical split between rationalists and empiricists.

AI maximalists and x-risk death cult fanatics are effectively being rationalists. They don't believe a sufficiently intelligent entity will be bound by the need to do science. It can, by sheer force of thought, figure out the answer to any question, develop a perfect course of action to achieve any goal, as quickly as electricity can traverse its own internal circuits.

It's interesting to see the constraints on how they can even study this in the paper, though. You can only ever ask a computing agent to do what it even can do. If you want it to explore, it needs a toy world that maybe digitally encodes a reasonable stripped-down representation of the real world, but without a body, sensors, and full autonomy, it can't ever truly explore the real real world.
That is an award winning web site.
> Vance has been clear he's a big tech skeptic

I'm sure he's extremely skeptical of Palantir and Oracle.
Self-checkout has its uses and supporters. Introverts, the socially anxious, people in a hurry, people who'd much prefer to bag (or double/triple bag) their own items in ways that work best for them, people who want to get the organic tomato at the price of the non-organic one.

It's absolutely still a scheme by companies to get rid of employees and get customers to do work for them for free, and there are still issues with the systems not working very well, but we at least have the option (in almost all cases) to queue up at the one or two registers with an employee doing the work. When it comes to AI, we're often not being given any choice at all. Even if we can avoid using it, or somehow avoid seeing it, we will still be training it.
Siri will shut up if you yell,

“Nobody asked you, Siri!” at it.

And that, kids, is how I met your mother.
How is that hard? You just need an address, doesn't even have to be yours.
the o3-mini model would be useful to me if coding's the only thing I need to do in a chat log.

When I use ChatGPT these days, it's to help me write coding videos and then the social media posts around those videos. So that's two specialties in one chat log.
Ephemeral Environments: Share More, Copy Less
Is it correct or incorrect that they open-sourced tbeir code? i.e. can anyone with $6M now take the DeepSeek training code, apply it to their dataset of interest, and train a new model that is not censoeed (i.e. even somehow intrinsically to the kodel itself)? Apologies I am not an AI engineer nor even a software engineer of my terminology usage isn't quite spot on.
I think it’s the other way around, what does MAGA offer Thiel.

They got him the presidency this time around, but he could dump them for centrists if that group is up for sale next time.
I'm afraid that even if the construction were expedited to the highest possible degree, a new nuclear power plant would take 5-6 years to go online.

If only they had been ever so slightly more friendly towards nuclear reactors, not the France or Korea level, of course, but still. And maybe trusted Mr Putin a tad less. 2022 was a wake-up moment, but 2014 and even 2008 were rather clearly audible signals. Alas...
Sorry, can you be more specific as to what law is being broken? You imply that this is illegal, but you don’t say how exactly.
So not surprising.
We can of course assume they will not be putting their financial interests ahead of the American people.

This "flood the zone" strategy of ethical and practical attack is ramping up nicely and I expect great things from the next couple of weeks, see
[https://www.reuters.com/world/us/musk-aides-lock-government-...]
and [https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/01/31/elon-musk...]
More of the exact same thing, but people who think using that mental framework rarely think that far ahead....
Thanks, I hadn't seen that, seems like it was just released a year ago. Seems like a step forward. I was talking about GDB/MI, which was the main (only?) option for decades and could still be considered the "native" frontend API of GDB.
Sometimes I worry that the internet has enabled ordinary but gullible people to find exactly the supporting evidence they need to be considered insane by society.
Are we still doing this in 2025? The same complaints were brought up about Amazon years ago. Companies can have no income tax liability based on the tax credits they get (for R&D or numerous other possible reasons), the way they depreciate assets, how their profits and losses are managed from an accounting perspective, etc. It doesn’t mean there is anything wrong happening. In fact it probably means the right thing is happening - companies typically are able to lower tax liability by doing things we incentivize them to do.
It’s not called the American Dream for nothing
It's Jack Welch's rank and yank but this time with LLMs!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitality_curve

I wonder if there are future plans to rank and yank LLMs, too. Or whether LLMs will exhibit "morale problems" because of it.
Sorry, which law is being broken here? Can you be specific?
I am glad that we are afraid. The real costs (no subsidies, fuel, waste and dismantling fully paid by owner) of nuclear are just too high. Hinkley Point in the UK is a warning. Investments are far more effective in solar, wind and storage capabilities. Market prices reflect that very well already.
Well I’m reasonably certain you don’t want advice from a search engine on the topic of fucking.

You may think you do, but I am certain you do not.
>Those two states have a combined population slightly smaller than NYC but have the highest rates of gun violence in the country.

They are also poorer than NYC and much more spread out, so enforcing the law is somewhat harder. Also, if you plotted out "shootings per gun" and "self-defense incidents involving a gun" I'm sure you would find it's not as bad as you think. Guns in the hands of normal people prevent crime.
Elon Musk is reportedly taking control of the inner workings of US govt agencies
You know what’s ironic is that Tesla survived because of Obama era subsidies. They were desperate to get one private enterprise to succeed because so many solar and other “clean” energy private ventures failed during that period. So, in my view, Obama created Elon. Now the rest of America has to deal with it in addition to the abject failure that is PPACA which ballooned US healthcare costs (not that Republicans have any alternative solutions or the desire to fix it).
> in that there's a legal obligation to report any observed illegal/fraudulent activity.

It might be interesting (not say challenging with a real risk of pushback into your RealLife) to get off the record comment about police ranks closing and reacting to anybody that threatened to or actually did spill beans about questionable activity.

The challenge to keeping a clean house is having an open and easy (and anonymous) path to acceptably highlighting the dirt.

For your general curiousity; from my part of the world (there are many stories, this is the bare surface of just one)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Quigley_(politician)

* Quigley was the lawyer for the Western Australian Police Union for 25 years. In 1983, he represented officers at the inquest into the death of John Pat, a 16-year-old Aboriginal boy. He became an honorary life member of the union in 2000 before entering state parliament in 2001.

Lawyer defends police who openly and racially kerb stomped a kid to death in a rough outback town. Police love him and draw him into the fold.

* In 2007, his life membership of the Western Australian Police Union was withdrawn after his parliamentary attack on police involved with the Andrew Mallard case, where he named a former undercover policeman who had a role in Mallard's unjust conviction. He planned to melt down his life membership badge, have it made into a tiepin with the words Veritas Vincit— "Truth Conquers", the motto of the school he attended—and present it to Mallard.

Eventually the daily exposure to defending corrupt police weighs heavy and a heart starts to beat.

* In 2011, he was accused of bringing the legal profession into disrepute, a charge stemming from his campaign to expose the wrongful jailing of Andrew Mallard for murder, to which he replied "...if you take on corrupt police you will be pursued and they will try and destroy you."

* He became the [ State ] Attorney-General on 16 March 2017.
With the amounts being invested into AI and even just in recognition of running an AI service (@see how openAI loses money on their $200 subscriber accounts). The "for funsies" services like switching an HTML form over to a chatbot are clearly not going to be a realistic resolution for this technology. I'd argue that even when it comes to code generation the tools can be useful for green-field prototyping but the idea that a developer will need to verify the output of a model will never cause more than marginal economy of tools in that sector.

The outcome that the large companies are banking on is replacing workers, even employees with rather modest compensation end up costing a significant amount if you consider overhead and training. There is (mostly) no AI feature that wall street or investors care about except replacing labor - everything else just seems to exist as a form of marketing.
25 million? How many books are going to be in there? All ten?
Lovely sentiment except the guy is breaking laws left and right. This is a hostile takeover of the government.
Taxes are part of politics
No. If Tesla (and the other companies mentioned) were investing all of this money into the business, then it would not be showing up as profits. Company taxes are not like individual taxes where only income is considered, and spending (mostly) disregarded.

Depending on which line on the income statement this is about, it is either money that could be sent to shareholders as dividends or buybacks, or money going into the cash reserves of the company.

And you are pushing a lot of opinion on the "unreasonably inefficient way". Governments are often very efficient spenders when you look at outcomes, often making private industries look awful. Medicare is a great example. It has a expense ratio of about %1.3, whereas the estimate for the Medicare Advantage plans (where they get to play games about who they let in) is that most of those private companies have an expense ratio of about %17. Private insurers are generally a bit better, usually at about %8.

To put more of a point on this, in the Affordable Care Act it was felt necessary to put a cap on the expense ratio of private insurers at %20 (%15 for large providers). That right there defines the "unreasonably inefficient way" we should be talking about.

I am not arguing that there is no waste in government, that would be silly. But the notion that government spending is generally a waste is not supported by the facts, and is more of a religious statement.
> At this point I'm convinced that the endless AI hype and all the investment is purely due to hopes that it will soon put vast amounts of employees out of work

That's certainly part of it.

However, at this point I think a lot of it is a kind of emotional sunk-cost. To stop now would require a lot of very wealthy and powerful people to admit they had personally made a very serious mistake.
Meta's Llama 2 license is not Open Source
The Freemasons which rule over you in the form of police and courts and the legislative branch built the Georgia Guidestones
You can put Google Search into Verbatim mode (via Search tools) to make it respect quotation marks.
>The gap between the ideology and the reality is deep enough to fall into forever.

Kind of like people describing DEI as "anti-white racism" despite the most common beneficiaries of DEI being white women.
Even though it was told that it MUST quote users directly, it still outputs:

> It’s already a game changer for many people. But to have so many names like o1, o3-mini, GPT-4o, & GPT-4o-mini suggests there may be too much focus on internal tech details rather than clear communication." (paraphrase based on multiple similar sentiments)

It also hallucinates quotes.

For example:

> "I’m pretty sure 'o3-mini' works better for that purpose than 'GPT 4.1.3'." – TeMPOraL

But that comment is not in the user TeMPOraL's comment history.

Sentiment analysis is also faulty.

For example:

> "I’d bet most users just 50/50 it, which actually makes it more remarkable that there was a 56% selection rate." – jackbrookes
– This quip injects humor into an otherwise technical discussion about evaluation metrics.

It's not a quip though. That comment was meant in earnest
>If the reason for the takedown is that the popular will of the people, as manifest in the preferences of the current President, deems this thing bad, and therefore we're taking it down, then that's a) inaccurate and b) deeply out of step with American tradition, principle, and governing philosophy.

Is the implication here that any sort of proactive action by companies to dodge enforcement actions a bad thing? For instance, if after Biden appointed Lina Khan to the FTC, and M&A firms suddenly stopped doing deals out of anti-trust concerns, is that bad? Or is it somehow only limited to advertising?
Why pay taxes when you can just buy the Whitehouse? It's so much cheaper.
We -- the people who live in front of a computer -- have been training ourselves to avoid noticing annoyances like captchas, advertising, and GDPR notices for quite a long time.

We find what appears to be the easiest combination "Fuck off, go away" buttons and use them without a moment of actual consideration.

(This doesn't mean that it's actually the easiest method.)
Unhappy with Win95 screensaver ex-pilot created his own, 25-yr business
No it's not. It's because management is tone deaf and out of touch. They'll latch onto literally anything put in front of them as a way out of their inability to iterate and innovate on their products.

Throwing "ai" into it is a simple addition, if it works, great, if it doesn't well the market just wasn't ready.

But if they have to actually talk to their users and solve their real problems that's a really hard pill to swallow, extremely hard to solve correctly, and basically impossible to sell to shareholders because you likely have to explain that your last 50 ideas and the tech debt they created are the problem that needs to be excised.
Tech tycoons have got the economics of AI wrong
I was very excited for Android's new virtualization features until I discovered that Android will only allow GOOGLE/OEM SIGNED VM IMAGES!?!? You won't be able to use your own kernel in the VM. https://source.android.com/docs/core/virtualization/security

Custom kernels would have been an important use case for virtualization since you might be stuck on an old kernel due to lack of updates from the OEM, or your kernel might be heavily trimmed down and missing many useful features.

And not only that, virtualization is also restricted to only Google/OEM apps. There will be no way to grant user apps access to the virtualization API.

So the only benefits you get from virtualization are the minor security improvement and maybe a slightly less locked-down user space.

One thing that is nice though, is how the VM architecture not only protects the host from the guest, but also the guest from the host. Other than that, incredibly disappointing....
Don’t forget Sofa King.
I created a cross-platform version using this approach https://github.com/sanbor/emoji

It's very slow in comparison because it uses llama3.2 model but it's a very common model and the emojis generated are more related to the lines.

Next feature would be to add an emoji model to this tool to make it faster.
> Sorry, can you be more specific as to what law is being broken?

At least in the case of the IG firings, he failed to comply with the 30 day notice required by law.

My point is actually broader than just the firings and dismissals. The elected President is not an elected autocrat. He doesn't get to do what he wants because "his doing so is literally democratic". He gets to act in a way that complies with the democratically set laws.
Where are the details in Chinese?
Both searches are weird, tbqh.
https://archive.ph/MGZV1
The fact that people committed abuses does not ipso facto make the abuses the inherent purpose of the system.
America rides eternal, shiny and chrome!
How did you get the latency so low?

Is it going through your own backend or directly connects to OpenAI for transcription?
Is that sacrcasm? Not sure what your point is.
Interestingly, the censorship can be somewhat bypassed in other languages than English (and, I presume, Chinese).
Could that run Pac the Man X? The fact that the guide you link suggests optimisations like disabling the 3D dock makes me think it would struggle mightily with a game. Afaik UTM doesn't support any GPU emulation or virtualisation at all. I'd love to be wrong on this.
Dang are we back to the years of the "Thanks Obama" I guess we truly live at the end of history and have no option but to rehash the classics, don't we ?
The "Advanced User Guide" referred to several times in the comments is The Advanced User Guide for the BBC Micro by Bray, Dickens and Holmes, 1983, ISBN 0 946827 00 1 . https://stardot.org.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=17242 https://archive.org/details/bbc-micro-advanced-user-guide/ I can't find a source for this now, but IIRC Bell and Braben themselves used this when writing Elite. (I am not an expert.)
actually, I might appreciate that.

I like precision of language, so maybe just have a system prompt that says "use precise language (ex: no symbolism of any kind)"
Google stopped being usable to search web many years ago. It can search stuff, sure, but not content on websites.
If your account has met various criteria (seasoned, karma, no comment throttling, etc), you’ll have a vouch option (unless you’ve done something to be in the penalty box permanently; sufficient karma, no comment throttling, no vouch).
darkly ;) ... vim accepts emacs navigation keys, like ^P and ^N
This is a neoliberalist forum. All startup ecosystem is a neoliberal concept.
> this is the perfect excuse for evil in humanity to continue to govern

Historical facts, like the Church and her teaching being invincible to the attacks against her over the millennia, has no relation to what ought to happen. Facts are facts not excuses and attempting to bring in that into the issue is a non-sequitur.
Irs.gov is definitely up. Merriment will ensue if it goes down.
VC relies on IPOs and BigTech M&A to survive... Need someone to pass their bags to.
Deepseek solved it.
I like self checkout for medium to small shops (which is pretty much all I do since my local small supermarket is 100 metres down the road). Before they put in the self checkouts there was always a huge queue for the registers and I avoided shopping there; now I almost never have to queue and it's much faster to get in, pick up a dozen items and get out.
> If you use ChatGPT, it sometimes gives you two versions

Does no one else hate it when this happens (especially when on a handheld device)?
It is also possible that we're just in the realm of pure speculation now - if you look at Tesla and NVidia both their valuations are completely imaginary and with the latter standing to benefit a lot by being shovel sellers (but not that much) and the former seeing an active decline in profitability while still watching the numbers go up.

It may be less that people are unaware of the speculative bubble but are just hoping to get in and out before it pops.
Wikipedia: "Atlantic Shores is a proposal by EDF Renewables/Shellm which acquired rights for BOEM OCS-A 0499 (NJWEA North), an 183,353 acres (74,200 ha) area".

An acquisition, in other words. The $1b is "mainly relating to renewable generation assets in North America", including that acquisition.
Yeah - the naming is confusing. We're seeing o3-mini. o3 yields marginally better performance given exponentially more compute. Unlike OpenAI, customers will not have an option to throw an endless amount of money at specific tasks/prompts.
Try using `-Lamport` to filter the latex results.