skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Swift hasn’t required Xcode for several years now. It has robust command line tooling and a VSCode plugin.

https://www.swift.org/documentation/articles/getting-started...
They're working on multiple technical upgrades already, and some airports have been upgraded. I think better information distribution is one thing. Large craft could have ADS-B (or ATC's view) tracking of a 1-3 mile bubble displayed to them. This would add a check to being blindly told what to do and blindly trusting that others are doing what they're told. You could change certain procedures such as the military having one pilot use NVG while the other not when flying in high traffic and high illumination airspace. No reason we can't add better sensors to planes when you think about all the collision detection we are adding in cars. I'm sure there are many other things that can be changed as well. Some of it's the pace. Stuff that's already been piloted and shown to be effective is still taking forever to roll out at the other airports.
It’s common in this type of statement for “A member of the public” to refer to any person rather than just one person.
What privacy benefit do you get running this locally vs renting a baremetal GPU and running it there?

Wouldn't that be much more cost-effective?

Especially when you inevitably want to run a better / different model in the near future that would benefit from different hardware?

You can get similar Tok/sec on a single RTX 4090 - which you can rent for <$1/hr.
Survive the Tyrant RPG
We were doing OCR on printed text. I tried to get access to the Zentralblatt MATH corpus, but no go.
ATC here (opinions are my own, not of the FAA, etc)

Pay is a huge part of it, so it really is that simple.

Qualified people are choosing not to even apply anymore because the pay is no longer competitive with other high-paying jobs that don't destroy you mentally and physically, or have a complicated hiring process like ATC does.
Intel XeSS is now available in 150 games
>the people who are (rightly or wrongly) advancing AI mostly don’t think of you at all

Just like lawnmowers don't think of hedgehogs.
I find it almost completely mind boggling that with all the breathless new coverage on the "incredible shortage of qualified tower personnel", I have yet to hear even one mention of what I find to be the elephant in the room.

Uhhh...why not use AI to start controlling the airports and airplanes? Talk about an app that, to me at least, seems an almost trivial use of its abilities and I'm sure that an AI could be trained in a very short period of time that could outperform a roomful of overaged, distracted humans...right?

Yes of course there is no way I'm the first to think of this...but just the fact that here it is day 3 or so, and literally NOT ONE MENTION ANYWHERE in the media about the potential for AI to safely land and direct all these flying things.
Are datasets mirrored anywhere where the govt doesn't automatically have a take down authority? If not there should be a mirroring effort.
I think Rick is probably moving all those jobs to Poland and India.
Socialist policians want more regulation in order to protect consumers and citizens. A lot of socialist politicians never have worked in a real job producing anything, so it does not register on their radar that protecting consumer may harm businesses. For them businesses are magical factories of GDP run by evil business sharks that need to be kept in check and more regulations are better.

Oh well. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.
Huh! I thought they'd be skinnier.
I think the question is the nature of the losses in the two cases, the transparency circumstances about them, and who exactly is making the decisions about specific datasets.

Time will tell but loss of public datasets is probably not usually good in general.
And until packages are actually shipped for all mainstream distros, the stigma is completely accurate.

No, neither "just install a tarball" nor "just install this docker image" count.
I mean, nothing ever actually scales linearly, right?