skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm talking specifically the ongoing 3GPP work from Rel-16 to Rel-19, and the proposed work by Qualcomm and Thales to validate the use-cases for formalisation of the standard.

Rel-18, the initial release for 5G-Advanced, only brought in the support for the new frequency bands for NTN above 10 GHz - the Ka band where most of our interest lies for large-scale large-bandwidth provisionment - in June of last year for equipment manufacturers.

https://www.lightreading.com/6g/5g-advanced-arrives-with-3gp...

You're not wrong in saying that most of what we hope to be achieved with NTN is, to be fair, NTN-NR - or 5G NTN - as a lot of it depends on NR technologies like MIMO and beamforming in certain spectrums.

Skylo did the first rollout of emergency SMS in Europe as per the 3GPP Release 17 specifications for Direct-to-Handset (D2H) connectivity in Q4 of last year. Note that Rel 17 designated only two usable frequency bands in Release 17 for 5G NTN use in the 5G FR1 range

https://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2024/11/26/deutsche-telekom-...
We want this tool to be for everyone that wants to train and tune their own LLMs.

Our vision is that the sphere of people who do these types of tasks will grow as LLMs become more accessible and the tooling becomes more reliable.

Let us know what other types of functionality you'd like to see. I will record Assistant-type functionality for our team to look into!
> they also fail even that test. Neither Meta nor DeepSeek have released the source code of the

This debate is over and makes the open source community look silly. Open model and weights is, practically speaking, open source for LLMs.

I have tremendous respect for FOSS and those who build and maintain it. But arguing for open training data means only toy models can practically exist. As a result, the practical definition will prevail. And if the only people putting forward a practical definition are Meta et al, this is what you get: source available.
Which neighborhood do you think he will buy in? Georgetown is the obvious choice, or maybe something closer near the Facebook office in Chinatown?
I think the challenge is largely a matter of scale. Once you have thousands or tens of thousands of people, communication becomes by far the dominant factor in outcomes. You can set up different structures and cultural norms to try to nudge things in the right direction, but there is no org structure that can solve this because local details always matter. The trick is understanding which details matter and why.

Ultimately I think this depends on management competence and judgement. I also think IC leadership is a critical counterweight to the distortions of empire building that incentivize creating messes. And finally as a competent individual you need the maturity to recognize the difference between unavoidable but tolerable organizational dysfunction, and broken leadership where its impossible to do good work, and hence time to cut bait and leave.
Alibaba probably doesn't want DeepSeek to get all the fame.
I think they tried to make OAuth(2) too flexible, and to me the lesson -- and I wonder if this is commonly understood this way or not -- is that it's preferable to make very simple clear limited-scope standards for clear use cases, even if that means they won't be able to meet all use cases. And then add on (even possibly in additional separate standards) for other use cases, after the first has been succesful.

With what we actually have, my impression (curious if others with more experience can confirm) is that you have to get lucky for different OAuth2 implementations to even be interoperable?
It is unclear to me if they are (or have) going to try to culture any of the samples. Are all the test going to be DNA tests? I would like to see some pictures of microbes that live in outer space. Also, I can imagine that there are microbes living on the outside of the station but can they grow?
There’s some truth in that, but isn’t making a radically cheaper version also a new idea that deepseek didn’t know whether it would work? I mean, there was already research into distillation, but there was already research into some of (most of?) OpenAI’s ideas.
Thanks; I don't think I said that we didn't know about it before the 1980s but extra information is rarely a bad thing.
Like, in a strict literal sense, sure? Do you mean to make a claim about moral or legal differences?
It's bad if they're lying about it.

I will say I bought two HDDs from Amazon just in November, and they were new. I just validated that as well. I purchased directly from Seagate on Amazon.
Regulation is only a small part of the story. Keep in mind that GDPR was implemented in 2018, long after Europe lost the tech battle.

The lack of a unified (financial) service sector and hence a very weak and fragmented private capital market (-> VC ecosystem) is a bigger problem. Most funding is from risk-averse banks and slow-moving governments.

Many EU based startups move to silicon valley for access to financing.
This needs more coverage. Perfectly good phones are getting thrown out because of a software update.
In fairness, it's at least a $5.6M moat at the moment, which is not exactly "no moat" but it is demonstrably not an insurmountable one, and it might become more shallow yet with time.
No. I think SAML(/Shibboleth) was a big influence to OAuth2 (?) and is probably the source of most of what ails OAuth2.
> WD make special SKUs for security camera use

The workload for a security camera or a DVR is going to be pretty different from a lot of NAS devices or desktop/server use. Shingled Magnetic Recording (SMR) is fine for things like a security camera, where you're just going to be writing long files and probably just overwrite eventually. SMR is really bad if you need lots of random sparse file modifications.

I do agree they're probably overboard on SKUs but having an obvious SMR SKU versus non-SMR is pretty important in my book. The fact they mixed in SMR into some regular drives and muddied the waters on which tech is going into which SKU really turned me off WD; I don't think I'll ever buy another one of their hard drives again.
Because the data is mine and the model is yours?
> Open source just means you have access to the source code.

That's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source-available_software , not 'open source'. The latter was specifically coined [1] as a way to talk about "free software" (with its freedom connotations) without the price connotations:

The argument was as follows: those new to the term "free software" assume it is referring to the price. Oldtimers must then launch into an explanation, usually given as follows: "We mean free as in freedom, not free as in beer." At this point, a discussion on software has turned into one about the price of an alcoholic beverage. The problem was not that explaining the meaning is impossible—the problem was that the name for an important idea should not be so confusing to newcomers. A clearer term was needed. No political issues were raised regarding the free software term; the issue was its lack of clarity to those new to the concept.

[1] https://opensource.com/article/18/2/coining-term-open-source...
In your grandparent comment you said experimentation makes you tremble in horror. The experimentation in question is with raw milk, so not even a particularly extreme sort of experimentation, since that's what all milk was for thousands of years. It's difficult to imagine what sort of experimentation you think is fine if that's not it.
There has been no such collective conclusion. It could be correct and there are several viable hypotheses in there worthy of further research but nothing that meets the standards of evidence-based medicine.
Every metric has limitations, but git blame line counts seem pretty uncontroversial.

Typical aider changes are not like autocompleting braces or reformatting code. You tell aider what to do in natural language, like a pair programmer. It then modifies one or more files to accomplish that task.

Here's a recent small aider commit, for flavor.

-# load these from aider/resources/model-settings.yml
-# use the proper packaging way to locate that file
-# ai!
+import importlib.resources
+
+# Load model settings from package resource
MODEL_SETTINGS = []
+with importlib.resources.open_text("aider.resources", "model-settings.yml") as f:
+ model_settings_list = yaml.safe_load(f)
+ for model_settings_dict in model_settings_list:
+ MODEL_SETTINGS.append(ModelSettings(**model_settings_dict))

https://github.com/Aider-AI/aider/commit/5095a9e1c3f82303f0b...
> There's nothing sexy about essentially staring at something in your hand for an hour or more every day.

Like a book?
What a joke OpenAI has become.
Your reply doesn't read like a refute to me, mnky9800n.
> don't aspire to be like Altman

Aspire to be like Aaron Schwartz.
I saw a some Europeans hoping that the US would ban DeepSeek, because then there would be less traffic interfering with their own DeepSeek queries.

The US can ban all they want, but if the rest of the world starts preferring Chinese social media, Chinese AI, and Chinese websites in general, the US is going to lose one of its crown jewels.

The way the US behaves is a problem and makes a lot of people prefer alternatives just for the sake of avoiding the US, which is why it's important that the US get along with other nations, but--well, about that...
You absolutely can put it in your hobbies!

The issue is that you rarely look your best in those pictures, and unless you are explicitly looking to date someone who loves to fish, you aren't showing them how they would integrate into your life.
And this is the functionality that makes social media sites worth it for the vast majority of people. They are there following people who are there to make money. The vast majority of people involved in social media are primarily or secondarily there because of money. So this move makes sense.

And that's why decentralized, federated, or whatever social networks will never gain a large scale (>1 million or so) users. The governments of the world will never allow non-corporations to provide the money transfers necessary for people to "make a living" on such sites. That's not a bad thing, but it does mean tha "alternative" social media really needs to stop chasing these kinds of users.
Technically, sure. What is the moral distinction though?
OpenAI is saying that their service was used in violation of their TOS, which is a bit different than just copying data. To be clear I’m not on OpenAI’s side, but it looks to me that the legal situation isn’t exactly analogous.
My wife was affected by this. When she applied for the $100 credit, she was told it could take up to three weeks to get the credit form.
> In retrospect, keeping China a weak communist nation was so easy.

This is extremely naive, and fallacious.

As policymaker, you do not know beforehand how countries are going to develop over a 40 year period (not even your own country :P). Thus the only realistic option would've been a catch-all sanction regime against... possible future geopolitical rivals? Non-democratic nations? States with different cultural values? No matter which you pick, sacrificing trade like that would've been extremely expensive and limiting for US growth (might've included India, Africa, Vietnam, Thailand, Japan, Europe, Russia, depending on what criteria you pick).

You might have seen other countries jumping at the opportunity, filling the gap and benefitting immensely in the process, like the EU, or India, Russia, Japan, some pan-African Union... The only certainty in the outcome is that the US in such a scenario would NOT be as wealthy as it is today.
Didn't they only "opensource" weights like others?
Have you done any experimentation with pre/pro-biotics? Just wondering if your fasting adjusted your gut biome, but now as you've resumed whatever diet that biome is being modified based on the fuels available to it.
It stands that humans will make the difference if they can do things that the AI cannot. The more capable the AI gets, however, the less humans will meet that threshold, and they are the ones that will lose out. Capital, on the other hand, will always make a difference.
Oddly, there is a Debian account on bluesky (debian.bsky.social), but that account isn't listed in the linked article, or on https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Publicity/otherSN

Is the bluesky account non-official?
It’s just numbers. You use other open source software to run it.
StampNotes for YouTube
Create and save timestamps with custom notes on YouTube videos

Enhance your YouTube experience with StampNotes! Easily create timestamps on YouTube videos, add personalized notes to each timestamp, and click to navigate directly to specific moments. Your notes are auto-saved and organized per video, ensuring you never lose track of important details. Perfect for students, professionals, and avid learners!
OpenAI has been hiding their datasets, and certainly haven't credited me for the data they stole from my website and github repositories. If OpenAI doesn't think they should give attribution to the data they used, it seems weird to require that of others.

Edit: Responding to your edit, Deepseek only claimed that the final training run was $5m, not that the whole process caught that (they even call this out). I think it's important to acknowledge that, even if they did get some training data from OpenAI, this is a remarkable achievement.
> you undermine our chances at constructive discourse when you exaggerate or otherwise decontextualize a situation.

You are proving my point. You have decided it is absurd to question anything. You have unilaterally decided what I said isn't true and whatever the hell you believe is, in fact, the only truth. Therefore, nothing to see here. Do not question authority. Do not question spending. Do not even bother to engage in any level of forensic accounting to see what's going on.

> It's also absurdly disingenuous to claim that "we never question taxation. And never question spending."

You are also confusing politicians TALKING about taxation and spending with us DOING something about it. For all that debating, we throw money at (likely) millions of things we should not be funding at all. One of those categories is what I call "stupid foreign aid".

At the state level, things are not any better. Here in CA we have been duped by politicians into throwing money at a ridiculous high speed train that went from "We can build it for $10 billion" to now being somewhere over $130 billion and rising. They are saying it will require another $140 billion to complete. Here we are, nearly twenty years after voter passed a $10 billion dollar proposition and got nothing for it. This stupid thing will probably cost half a trillion dollars and will never attract enough riders to even approximate direct and indirect costs.

You have to wonder how many projects like this exist in the federal budget. Crap that is doing nothing but burning cash.

> by much more serious people than yourself.

And then, having nothing to say, you resort to personal attacks. As if that is going to change reality in any way. Good for you.

We must kneel down, bow our heads and accept what we are told. Taxation is OK. Do no question it. Ever. Spending is OK. Do not question it. Ever.

Got it.
Case Study: ByteDance Uses eBPF to Enhance Networking Performance
Austerity often comes naturally with age, just because spending money requires effort and energy older people don't have.
Thanks for adding detail! My prompts have been very in-the-bubble-of-Qt I'd say, less so about mashing together Qt and something else, which I agree is a good real-world test case.
This might be an ignorant question, but are these therapies likely to help chronic fatigue that predates Covid-19?
To be fair, it's amazing by the standards of six months ago. The only models that beat it are o1, the latest gemini models and (for some things) sonnet 3.6
>"Can't" or "don't want to"?

Can't. Even if someone has the money (I truly doubt), you can't contact millions of copyright owners (as you report).
Not sure about the previous post, but also python’s OrderedDict collection guarantees order-sensitive equality checks. [1]

Plain dict maintains insertion order but equality checks only check that the key/value pairs are the same. [2] [3]

[1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.html#:~:text=e...

[2] https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#:~:text=dict...

[3] https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#:~:text=dict...
The President can only pardon Federal crimes.

State-level crimes (like his NY felonies) and civil torts (like his case where he owes $500M currently) are separate.
It ironically seems like a very similiar market to internet search. There was no moat there either, other than the capital needed to bankroll a better search engine.
A lot of these AI companies will eventually fail (not because their models will be significantly worse but because of failure to commercialize), the market will consolidate with only a couple of players (maybe two in the US, one in China and maybe one in Russia). And once that happens the idea of raising enough capital and building a competitive AI company will seem impossible. Exactly like what transpired with internet search after Google won most of the market.
The picture at the end showing deepseek's privacy policy and being concerned that it's "a security risk" is hilarious[1]. Basically every B2C company collects this sort of information[2], and is far less intrusive than what social networks collect[3]. But because it's Chinese and at the risk of overtaking Western companies, people are suddenly worried about device information and IP addresses?

[1] https://semking.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/DeepSeek-1024...

[2] https://www.bestbuy.com/site/help-topics/privacy-policy/pcmc...

[3] https://www.facebook.com/privacy/policy/
> Your relative margin may have doubled, but your absolute profit-per-item hasn't.

ChatGPT doesn't have any profits right now.

We have no idea what investors are expecting future profits to be.

> Say you had a 10% margin before, at a $100 price and $90 cost, for a $10 profit-per-item. Reduce price 27x and cost 45x, so $3.7 price, $2 cost, and $1.7 profit-per-item. 6x less profit - not as bad as 27x, but not good if you're OpenAI.

Now do the same thing but assume you have 10x more subscribers because the prices are ~27x lower.

You end up with almost 2x more total profit.

Just take ChatGPT's ~$200 subscription. Hardly anyone is going to pay ~$200 a month. Reduce that by 27x - and you're at $7.5 per month. Maybe 10% of people on the planet will pay that.
There is no network effect (amazon, instagram, etc.) not an enterprise vendor lock-in (Microsoft Office/AD, Apple Appstore, etc.) In fact, it's quite the opposite, the way these companies deliver ouput is damn near identical. Switching between them is pretty painless.
> when companies en masse stopped paying stock dividends

Do you mean cash dividends [1]?

Also, the premise is false. Dividend yields have roughly tracked interest rates [2]. (The difference is a dirty component of the equity risk premium [3].)

[1] https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/05/stockcashdividen...

[2] https://www.multpl.com/s-p-500-dividend-yield/table/by-year

[3] https://www.investopedia.com/investing/calculating-equity-ri...
In this case, the context is "we face the same risk all the time, from asteroids we don't see." I'm not convinced that's reassuring.

The Sagan paper concerns much larger asteroids, which are correspondingly more rare. For asteroids in the 8MT impact range, it doesn't make much military sense to launch deep space missions to divert them years in advance, rather than delivering nukes directly with ICBMs in minutes. Given any competent asteroid defense system, an asteroid diversion would be detected immediately and countered, and the perpetrators would face consequences.

In fact, since we already have rockets that can reach asteroids, I'd say the possibility of malicious diversion makes a defense system more important.
But that's not the goal, the goal is to protect the "intelectual property" only to American companies. Countries not in the "friends list" cannot sell products in that area without suffering repercussions. That's how the US has maintained technological dominance in some areas by restricting what other countries can do.
Yes, reading this post (working around a database's concurrency control) made me raise an eyebrow. If you are ok with inconsistent data then that's fine. Or if you handle consistency at a higher level that's fine too. But if either of these are the case why would you be going through DuckDB? You could write out Parquet files directly?
if you see the 8 slimes, they cluster in a

SSS
SLS

pattern that can be rotated where the Ss are 8 strength slimes and the L is the 1 strength lich that, when killed, reveals all 8/5 strength slimes on the map. if the pattern is obvious from what you have revealed so far, it's worth it to kill the lich to give more map knowledge. but yeah, save the 8s for leveling up late game.
All those things are not self-evident and thus debatable
I think he's talking about a server-side session store (or perhaps an encrypted cookie payload)
Thread here,

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42864272 ("Asteroid Impact on Earth 2032 with Probability 1% and 8Mt Energy (nasa.gov)", 69 comments)
Safety is super important and I share your concern. I think online dating is similar to the internet. When the Internet started, there was a niche group that were really into it (early adopters). This was also true for dating apps in their infancy. It was safer simply because the pool was self selected (you had to be open minded to even try it).

Then the internet became for everyone and so did online dating. When there's that many people involved, things get more unsafe. It's not the same pool of early adopters on the same wavelength. It's everyone now, and everyone includes every wave length.

Stay safe!
Many conditions aren't well understood and simply don't have effective treatments.
Good thing that is part of the wikipedia entry:

> Any piece of digital information is representable as a number; consequently, if communicating a specific set of information is illegal in some way, then the number may be illegal as well.
Slap and FLOP security flaws affect all current and older Apple devices
I see no problem, assholes deserve bullshit.
Did it look better in person than it does in the render?
> Giving third parties JIT on iOS would decrease security.

Well, at least in this case it would have greatly increased security (since it would have allowed the availability of actual, native Chrome and Firefox ports).

And otherwise: Does Apple really have zero trust in their OS in satisfying the basic functionality of isolating processes against each other? This has been a feature of OSes since the first moon landing.
I guess if it « didn't ultimately popped » neither did the dotcom bubble - nor any housing bubble.
Has the UI become more Mac-like on the Mac? This is the only reason I still go back to TextMate even though I purchased SublimeText.
looks impressive
Hm? I thought most people were on social media for, you know, social things: sharing photos, discussions, etc. Sending money is an important social activity, but I can't think of a single time I've wanted to use Twitter (when I used it) to send money -- the circles of activities weren't heavily overlapping.

(This has nothing to do with politics or decentralization or anything else.)
LSP and formatter were really fast to set up. I used kickstart.nvim to get started and lsp and formatter are already mostly configured.

DAP is trickier to set up but is doable. How often are you really debugging though? In the beginning just run both neovim and your ide and just switch when you debug.

Back when LSP wasn’t a thing I still used vim but would just switch to an IDE when I needed to go code exploring and needed to be able to jump to definition and stuff like that. Wasn’t a big deal and was worth it to use both tools because vim is such a superior method for editing text.