skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nah, that doesn't count. There are countless ways you can hurt yourself with things around the house if you use them wrong. Most people aren't educated about safe drug use (thanks to abstinence policy), yet the number of people having serious problems as a result of MDMA use is still lower than many other activities.
Double thank you!!
A $1.8mm 30 year fixed rate mortgage is about $12k per month at today’s rates. That wouldn’t include taxes and insurance, just the principal and interest.
And when they announced that third term amendment people said "Aha, well we can run Obama against him!" -- which might be a win, if they hadn't written the constitutional amendment to literally only apply to one living president: Trump.
Excellent tip, thank you sir!
Shotguns have proven ineffective as drone defenses. Range is too short and the targets are too fast.
Alexandr Wang did not even say they lied in the paper.

Here's the interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9Ekl9Izd38. "My understanding is that is that Deepseek has about 50000 a100s, which they can't talk about obviously, because it is against the export controls that the United States has put in place. And I think it is true that, you know, I think they have more chips than other people expect..."

Plus, how exactly did Deepseek lie. The model size, data size are all known. Calculating the number of FLOPS is an exercise in arithmetics, which is perhaps the secret Deepseek has because it seemingly eludes people.
The Chromium/Webkit renderer used to have multiple rendering backends. You might use or add a no-op backend.
Buggy, sure. It’s new.

Abandoned? I don’t think that’s accurate at all.
I've never actually used it but for laughs I one time elm.setAttribute('value', elm.value) for each field so that the values are in the html, then just upload the form innerHTML, append it to a file and use some dom/xml parser to get at the values. If the user needs to edit the values simply reinsert the html form into a page. If they only need to look at it use ccs to disable pointer events and remove the outlines from form fields. It was a pretty hilarious experiment. The form all of a sudden worked just like the paper version. You write your name on the dotted line where it says name then the data is stored right there.

With some js I could easily add field sets and sub sets. For example click add address, add house numbers, add additional employee/function/phone numbers sets, they can each have 100 email addresses and 1000 websites etc

xpath isn't sql but if the data looks this much like xml?

Converting posted values into table rows and back makes me feel like I'm doing something I'm not supposed to. Tables do not fit our mental model. What is the right solution if you only have one customer who has 6 phone numbers? The enterprise thing to do is add a table with phone numbers and give each number a number. lol?

DB performance is of course godly at scale but if it is just one form that lives on the users computer.... it might not be a nail?

> Hierarchical tree, Categories, tags and search.

It's a fun puzzle, no idea how far we are solving it. We should probably record what one looks at and have a button to mirror a publication locally.

I've often pondered how discovery can be pushed so that things of interest to you may gravitate towards you (and to those with similar interests). 100% accuracy at that would be a game changer. Someone out there is writing precisely that what I need or want to be reading.
"Intelligent" does not mandate "friendly".

Why is Musk banned by the constitution of the US from becoming the president of the US, and why does similar logic not also apply to being in charge of major government processes? Especially given that the same administration that is happy with Musk doing all this is unhappy with migrants (a category that includes Musk) and even their children born in the US?

Even at their best, both Musk and Trump are lax with the rules.
AI has more than 10x'ed grant applications. Problem is the proposal evaluation side is not allowed to skip obvious LLM spam proposals nor use the same AI tools for doing/writing the evals.

So, if you were not a competent startup also good at writing grant proposals, getting funding for your startup from the cheapest capital available has become far more accesible.
Germany is the only Western European country with an Eastern European capital. As a result, Berlin was poorer than the rest of the country, but this is no longer the case. Since reunification, Berlin has had the fastest growing economy in Germany and is now close to Hesse in terms of GDP per capita.
I've also read that Deepseek has released the research paper and that anyone can replicate what they did.

I feel like if that were true, it would mean they're not lying.
Still shocks me that sharks evolved before trees.
Maybe of interest: https://github.com/clasp-developers/clasp/ (Lisp env. that uses LLVM for compilation; new-ish, actively developed.) However, my impression (I didn't measure it) is that the compilation speed is an order of magnitude slower than in SBCL, never mind CCL.
nah it's too expensive
The most important thing to realize is that, if you can no longer feel comfortable with shipping code "that can fail in various scenarios" then you would need the tests anyway. TypeScript and Java are not Coq, and you probably wouldn't enjoy using a properly rigorous language like that anyway (and the kinds of programs that can actually be "statically proven correct" are generally not very capable). Type checking doesn't make e.g. the halting problem go away; you are only verifying that types are compatible and not that the code actually does what it's supposed to do.

Anyway, when you write code in a dynamically typed language, you do work in a restricted domain - just implicitly. You expect the input to provide a particular interface, and if it doesn't, there will be some kind of runtime exception. Oh well. You use exceptions for runtime debugging, not just to detect user error. Yes, this does require a different sort of discipline.

But there is no accounting for taste. The language you describe are not only statically typed, but manifestly typed - i.e., you need to explicitly specify types within the code. Some people like the visual reminder; others loathe the extra typing (er, keypresses). Of course there are also statically typed languages that infer typing from use patterns, such as the Haskell family.

> I was not able to maintain few guarantees here like : if I take X = XS[0], there is no way for typescript to guarantee that X is a value is that is guaranteed to be contained in XS.

Well, yes; membership in a container is not type information. It can't be, not for mutable containers anyway. After all, the contents are determined at runtime.
Tailscale doesn’t route all your traffic by default. It routes only traffic destined to Tailscale IPs, which in your case should be near zero.

You can use an exit node. In that case it will route all your traffic to your home network.
Anecdotally I'd say I can't imagine living with like, one or two people I turn to for emotional support. Would be a nightmare. I know probably 20 or 30 people I could turn to if I needed something, even just to vent.

I wouldn't even necessarily say I'm that close with most of them. It's sort of just... table stakes?
What concerns me is that this long rightward swing is happening in the absence of any serious crises.

When the OG Nazis came to power, Germany was in terrible shape. They had lost a catastrophic war and were still being ground under the victors' boot heels, at least in the citizenry's own estimation. Never mind 12% inflation, it went as high as 12 digits in the years leading up to 1933. It's hard to blame them for latching onto someone promising to "Make Germany Great Again," and it's not surprising that they didn't feel an incentive to quibble over the details.

In the past election, US voters treated the price of eggs as an emergency of similar scope. That's about all that was going on. Eggs. Eggs were too expensive. They're even more expensive now, of course, but try telling Fox News addicts that. Can you imagine what things would be like in America -- the quality of the leaders we'd be electing -- if we were facing what Germany faced in the 1930s?
> I know a woman who won the lottery at a young age, but kept her job as a waitress for decades because she wanted to be a waitress

This is a lovely anecdote, but practically speaking most people do not have such enjoyable jobs. The world needs septic tank specialists and web developers and telephone sanitisers and accountants. Most of the things that need doing aren't all that desirable to do on their own. This is not to say that you can't take joy in doing them anyway, after all one must imagine Sisyphus happy, but merely that given ultimate choice, most people would not choose their current working arrangement. For instance within the field of programming, most people probably have something else they'd rather work on than what they do for living. Your millionaire waitress probably wouldn't want to work behind the fryer at MacDonalds.

> We definitely do not have the same definition of 'work ethic' if this is what you took from my words.

Clearly. In my view, work ethic is unrelated to enjoyment of your job. Someone with a good work ethic would be willing to do jobs that they don't enjoy, and would complete them at a similar standard to the work they do enjoy. It's easy to have a good work ethic when doing something you want to do; the real test of it is the things you don't want to do.
I think that article is more about the public not understanding “real poetry”(understandably) rather than testament to AI capability.

But I agree with you: there is a selection bias going on. I have no idea how much good AI writing I’ve been reading without realizing it.
Even if you think this particular team cheated, the idea that nobody will find ways of making training more efficient seems silly - these huge datacenter investments for purely AI will IMHO seem very short sighted in 10 years
One obvious counterpoint is that using AI tools allows manipulation of the discussion in a similar way to using a bullhorn in a coffee shop, only without revealing that you're the one holding the bullhorn. 10,000 bots "contributing to the discourse" in accordance with prompts and parameters controlled by one or a few individuals is quite different from the genuine opinions of 10,000 actual humans, especially if anyone is trying to use the discussion to get a sense of what humans actually think.
Based on the solid wall of text I see that you continue to admire Steve bannon's technique. Good job.
Hope you do something kind for yourself to feel better <3
Need? Perhaps not. But outcomes improve, as explained by the article:

“Emotional support, defined as providing comfort and understanding, is essential for well-being, particularly in older adults, where it predicts better cognitive health, emotional stability, and life expectancy”

Sometimes there are good reasons for things beyond necessity.
Even that can be conditional. Parents deliberately remove themselves from their children's lives sometimes for various reasons. Child is gay/trans or othered in some other way. Child commits some serious crime, etc.

It could also be the parent is too much of a mess(drug addict, etc) that they can't love their child.
to correctly judge some fizzbuzz solutions (or approaches to refactoring) you would also have to be knowledgeable. Guess what I think the problem is.
> ensure the project or major feature I was over was done on time, on budget and meets requirements.

The issue with this is that the bounds are drawn by someone else, the best you can do is 'meet them'. No one really cares if you save 90% of the budget, it was already allocated and will just get funnelled off somewhere else. It doesn't matter if it's early, because they probably didn't need it until they said they needed it, and 'meets requirements' is a given.

Compare this to a sales job or something more outward facing, a sales person might have targets but can blow them out of the water with some luck and skill (and get paid commission). They aren't operating within someone else's small framework, but a free variable against the open market.
I don't find this remotely compelling, I can easily come up with clues that make sense to me to connect a ton of words the difficulty is coming up with clues that others will look at the same way. The last example is exactly what I mean, "paper" makes sense for those 4 only when you explain it. If "Line" counts then why not "Gum" (which is typically wrapped in paper) or if "Lawyer" is valid then why not "King" (who's decrees are written on what?).
think about how big the prize is, how many people are working on it and how much has been invested (and targeted to be invested, see stargate).

And they somehow yolo it for next to nothing?

yes, it seems unlikely they did it exactly they way they're claiming they did. At the very least, they likely spent more than they claim or used existing AI API's in way that's against the terms.
Sailfish is based on the Linux kernel, and Mer, which itself is a fork of MeeGo - a mobile Linux distro.

Hybris is just one component that Mer supports: a compatibility layer which allows the use of Android libraries and drivers. But that doesn't make it the backbone of Sailfish...
Weird that the URL links to the bottom of the page(?).
Reddit's /r/chatgpt subreddit is currently heavily brigaded by bots/shills praising r1, I'd be very suspicious of any claims about it.
There are often elections in dictatorships, as you may find out.
Interesting. If we look at the idea of subsides between region, and we accept that this the right way of thinking about it and assume it's factual and that simple. Then I think one of the questions worth asking is effectively do we want to try reduce that inequality or do we want to perpetuate it. Neither is obviously right or wrong, but I think that's the core question. If we are believe to the idea in the article then we can see a reasonable case that the disparity between the regions has been, if not deliberate, than an obvious outcome of previous policy. Which makes the argument that we shouldn't invest in the regions requiring subsidy circular.

There are investments beyond transport that we could make. Not all investments generate or should be judged against short-term returns. That a 1B tram system in Leeds may be less than effective does not mean we shouldn't invest at all. I don't see why we need an insane bet rather than a programme of improvement across the board.
Yeah it's interesting to take these ideas to the extreme... even at the lower end I don't like it, I think zero communication outside of clues is the best way to follow the spirit of the game. But a little bit of banter and "kibitzing" is what makes it fun too.
Me and a buddy got expelled for "hacking the school network" by using "net send" to interrupt our teacher's presentations.
On mobile (Safari), the link to the article scrolls me down towards the bottom of the page by the iframe/red dot, making me think half the page was missing.
The ultimate exploit is to create fake "likes". Once any system of likes becomes successful, it gets used for (a) filtering news feeds, and (b) establishing consensus & social truth. This is the biggest exploit there is.

A cheap system for "likes", such as this, is only safe when few people use it. Once it becomes popular, and worth something, it gets exploited, and then utterly fails.
After skimming the landing page, I still have no idea what this does. Generate animated videos based on my notes and sketches maybe? If so, how would that help me learn? And learn what? Is this for physics classes? Language learning? Learning to code?

It would be helpful if you added a comment explaining who you are, what this does, why you made this, how it works. And if you showed some examples on the landing page - input, output. The idea of a Show HN is to give people something to play with. And I can’t do that here, at least not without signing up (which I have no reason to do, being in the dark).

Personally, I didn’t like that you used the Feynman name. Even OpenAI picked people who have been dead for more than a century when naming their initial models (Babbage, Curie, etc.). People still read books written by Feynman or watch his lectures on YouTube. Hijacking his name for a product that isn’t endorsed by him or his family seems uncool.
I've seen these fees in personal accounts. They're usually waived if you maintain a certain minimum balance. Sometimes it's a few thousand dollars, but if you want things like free checks or other "perks" they can be much more. And of course they don't pay meaningful interest on your deposits. They're basically charging you the fee in the form of lost interest.
I wonder if they're something structurally akin to cypress knees: either structural buttresses or pneumatophores?
Aside from the other reasons already mentioned, fully public agencies would be astoundingly inefficient and ineffective. Government agencies are already subject to an intense amount of scrutiny (some sincere, some extremely bad faith) and if every email, bulletin, roadmap, etc. were public by default agencies would become even more catatonic than they already are. There needs to be a space for reasonable disagreement and problem-solving without the possibility of immense personal, professional, and political consequences.

It could also make accountability harder because it would encourage avoiding paper trails whenever possible, even when employees believe they are acting within the law.

Is FOIA the right amount of openness? I don't know, probably not, but it's definitely better than public-by-default.
CEO of a human based data labelling services company feels threatened by a rival company that claims to have trained a frontier class model with an almost entirely RL based approach, with a small cold start dataset (a few thousand samples). It's in the paper. If their approach is replicated by other labs, Scale AI's business will drastically shrink or even disappear.

Under such dire circumstances, lying isn't entirely out of character for a corporate CEO.
I don't believe that the model was trained on so few GPUs, personally, but it also doesn't matter IMO. I don't think SOTA models are moats, they seem to be more like guiding lights that others can quickly follow. The volume of research on different approaches says we're still in the early days, and it is highly likely we continue to get surprises with models and systems that make sudden, giant leaps.

Many "haters" seem to be predicting that there will be model collapse as we run out of data that isn't "slop," but I think they've got it backwards. We're in the flywheel phase now, each SOTA model makes future models better, and others catch up faster.
There are other sites where you might be happier, if you don't want to share your own perspective here.
You’re catching flak, but I’m with you, I live in NYC and I wouldn’t even look at a job for less than $400k liquid total comp. And that would be cutting it close.

That said, people do it:

1. What constitutes a “decent area” varies from person to person.

2. My kid goes to private school (at more $5k per month), but some people live in districts where public schools are great.

3. Living in a no income tax state helps a lot too.

I could see a family being just fine on $10k per month take-home if they bought their house awhile ago, kids go to public school, they travel domestically, etc.
Request to Add Thiamine Injections to Parkinson's Treatment
The way I see it, the rules are simply constraints and obstacles put in place to see how robust, reliable, and readable you can write your code under those conditions.
It’s not just the economy that is vulnerable, but global geopolitics. It’s definitely worrying to see this type of technology in the hands of an authoritarian dictatorship, especially considering the evidence of censorship. See this article for a collected set of prompts and responses from DeepSeek highlighting the propaganda:

https://medium.com/the-generator/deepseek-hidden-china-polit...

But also the claimed cost is suspicious. I know people have seen DeepSeek claim in some responses that it is one of the OpenAI models, so I wonder if they somehow trained using the outputs of other models, if that’s even possible (is there such a technique?). Maybe that’s how the claimed cost is so low that it doesn’t make mathematical sense?
> People happily post on Bluesky or HN for free. I think paid content is a different genre, and we need to figure out how to get people to pay for it other than advertising.

I think this is so important and something that gets missed a lot, especially any place that is even tangentially related to "entrepreneurship" like HN. "Why wouldn't you try to monetize every single aspect of your life?"

I do wood working as a hobby. People keep asking me if I have plans to sell my stuff, then they look at me weird when I say no. Some of them even look like they've been personally insulted, which is weird considering I'm the one being pressed.

I do it because I can make nice things for my family and friends, unique things that have a lot of meaning to them. It's not possible to monetize what I do because what I do only works because it's not monetizable.
Isn't it possible with more efficiency, we still want them for advanced AI capabilities we could unlock in the future?
My industry? My industry is tech, where I got paid 7 figures for years and years doing fuck all to benefit society. It’s pretty telling that you just assumed someone defending a marginalized group was a member of that cohort.

Are there improvements that could be made in the grant process? Sure, just like there are improvements that could be made in any process. That is not a justification for taking a sledgehammer to the existing institution and affecting thousands of our brightest and hardest working residents who generally are not in it for godforsaken money but to better society. The ends in your kindergarten example do not justify the means. This is political, it’s not a merit-based cleansing.

I’m sure someone such as yourself would never see medical research as a public good so I guess we’re done here. The ideological bridge is too vast and frankly I have lost complete interest in the drivel on the other side.
Or- fedi's design encourages more self-hosting because it's so easy and straightforward. With AT, yes it's harder to run your own instance but there's also less reason to: personalized moderation/feeds are just built in.
I know it's supposed to be a joke but it actually encapsulates one of the core issues about this already on the language level, men thinking they'd "get" something out of thin air. Do you think women have 31.41x larger emotional support networks out of thin air? Of course not, they put the effort in. Men don't.
Just because there's big fat juicy carrot doesn't mean we shouldn't acknowledge the stick
I wonder if it would be possible to do this in a way that the page shows its own source code.

Similar to:

https://no-gravity.github.io/html-quine/index.html

Could be tricky, because non-textual elements would probably have to be taken care of individually. For example a video would probably have to show a video of its own representation in code.