skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't have any qualified source and this metric would be likely be quite confidential even internally.

It is just an educated guess factoring costs of running similar/comparable models to 4o or 4o-mini per token, and how azure commitments work with OpenAI models[2], also knowing that Plus subscriptions are probably more profitable[1] than API calls.

It would be hard for even OpenAI to know with any certainty because they are not paying for Azure credits like a normal company. The costs are deeply intertwined with Azure and would be hard to split given the nature of the MS relationship[3]

----

[1] This is from experience of running LibreChat using 4o versus ChatGPT Plus for ~200 users, subscriptions should quite profitable than raw API by a order of 3 to 4x, of course different types of users and adoption levels will be there my sample while not small is not likely representative of their typical user base.

[2] MS has less incentive to subsidize than say OpenAI themselves

[3] Azure is quite profitable in the aggregate, while possibly subsidizing OpenAI APIs, any such subsidy has not shown up meaningfully in Microsoft financial reports.
Obligatory mention of Dokku alternatives: Caprover, Coolify.
JReleaser author here.

Yes, GoReleaser served as an inspiration to get started with the tool. The guide does mention this connection. I can certainly add one more entry to the FAQ to make it easier to find.

Regarding multi-language support, it’s available since day 1. Recently it became better https://andresalmiray.com/multi-language-support-in-jrelease...
Same in Serbo-Croatian:
1 mačka
2-4 mačke
5+ mačaka
0 mačaka
Is this Ellison's attempt to become #1 richest again?
Can somebody give me a rational take on why? It feels immensely reactive. Salt Typhoon would seem to represent an active threat. Didn't DHS act quite.. conservatively?

A comment on the blusky thread went to "five eyes should stop sharing information" which I suspect won't happen, but I could see people thinking it should.
I think "types" is the solution of two completely different problems:

1. how to specify memory layout for faster execution

2. how to give hint when I press . in IDEs

if you use typing outside these two scopes you'd probably find many troubles.
The information they communicate about the number of spoons in the room is the same.

The information they communicate about the state of mind of the participants in the conversation is not the same.
Make sure your meeting participants know you’re transcribing them. Has similar notification requirements as recording state to state.
Pardoning Manning while still going hard after Assange was a new level of pandering to the LGBTQ lobby. Pretty disgusting in its own right, I agree.
Your argument has nothing do to with the point I was trying to make.
Cause violence against funds is what really matters
Well this is insane.
LWN sluggish due to DDoS onslaughts from AI-scraper bots
Is the next logical move not letting you keep them distinct?
Maybe someone could politely explain it to him then instead of the condescending, alienating snark for which the computing community is infamous.
I think you might be a better fit for reddit than hackernews. The lack of thoughtfulness, heavy use of signalling and petty insults are more normal there.
As I said above, your argument has nothing do to with the point I was trying to make. You call it cynical I call it 1.8 Billion.
glove didn't fit
Technically it already works as long as your app is published to GH releases and/or the currently supported package managers.

Support for explicit Python ecosystem tools and services (pypi, .whl files, etc) is forthcoming.
Are we pretending the silk road was actually a legitimate marketplace and a few bad actors might have used it for things that break the law?
Don't they say in the article that it is also for scaling up power and datacenters? That's the big cost here.
And what dictator is going to implement this perfect solution?

Here's how things have manifestly played out over the past 150 years: procedural rules are strengthened because citizens are afraid of unjust prosecution. Some high profile bad guys, or parade of run-of-the-mill criminals, get off because of said procedural loopholes, after which voters demand politicians expand substantive criminal law to re-balance the equation. Upon which more unjust prosecutions enter the public consciousness. Wash, rinse, repeat.

This is what systemic injustice looks like, and the cycle continues as unabated as ever. On the one hand, you have movements like BLM, which have indeed effected change even in the most conservatives jurisdictions, largely by changes in procedural rules by courts and in policy by prosecutors and municipalities. At the same time, you have #MeToo, Harvey Weinstein, etc, which has resulted in the expansion of sexual crimes and punishments, and elimination of statutes of limitations, partly because procedural protections have made it extremely difficult to prosecute past behaviors, not because they strictly weren't already cognizable crimes.

Nobody is going to lose sleep over Weinstein, but long-term which demographics will bear the brunt of this tightening of the screws through the substantive law? You see the fundamental contradictory behavior here? There's tremendous overlap between the #MeToo groups and the BLM groups, and for both their demands are premised on empathy and justice, but at the end of the day we're going to end up with a harsher system that will further disproportionately punish some segments of the population over others. That's what systemic racial injustice looks like, yet nowhere can you find ill intentions or a desire to oppress anyone.

There's an alternative path, here. Notice how the legal screws have taken centuries to slowly but inexorably tighten without any concerted effort, yet in less than a single generation the normative behaviors of individual judges and other legal professionals, both as regards defendant rights (BLM) and victims rights (#MeToo) has seen a sea change. That suggests that by giving back more discretion to the system, not less, it's possible and, IMO, much more likely we could end up with a more fair system all around. Not guaranteed, of course, but neither is it guaranteed that just throwing more money and resources at the existing system would, even assuming we could even achieve let alone maintain that degree of attention from society. The difference between these two approaches, though, is that one requires trusting our fellow citizens, while the other holds out the (fantastical) prospect of an engineered solution.
I'm pointing to the transaction layer. When you get thousands of dollars and product in a room with people you don't know things can get extremely unprofessional very quickly. It's really fun when you discover that most of the currency is counterfeit which happens more than you think.

What you say is also true. So there is a trade here. I'm not claiming it's "worth it," but the alternative without SR at all does seem to be more negative.
Very cool idea. I’ve used gemma2 2b for a few small things. Very good model for being so small.
Doesn't `fortune` inside double quotes execute the command in bash? You should use single quotes instead of backticks.
The problem is, they are hugely incentivised to hype to raise funding. It’s not whether they are “wrong”, it’s whether they are being realistic.

The argument presented in the quote there is: “everyone in AI foundation companies are putting money into AI, therefore we must be near AGI.”

The best evaluation of progress is to use the tools we have. It doesn’t look like we are close to AGI. It looks like amazing NLP with an enormous amount of human labelling.
Which is why "jury nullification" still exists. Just because a law exists does not mean the public good is automatically improved by blithely enforcing it with zero tolerance.
Except nobody is selling Wikipedia for 1.8 Billion. Do you see the difference? Congrats on totally missing the point.
That's a 15 year old.

I can't even convince what the gouvernements are able to do. You could technically route signal over tor network but then even tor has vulnerabilities with it's C coding.
Their comment wasn’t about what was legally right. I thought the part where they said something like “regardless of whether it is by courts doing things properly, by courts doing things improperly, or by some vigilante” made that clear enough?

Whether someone morally deserves a punishment for a crime depends on whether they actually did it, not on whether they are considered innocent in the eyes of the law.

Of course, I don’t generally support vigilantism , so I don’t think people should try to make other people get what they think the other people deserve as punishment. But, that doesn’t mean that people can’t deserve worse than the law prescribes, just that people shouldn’t like, try to deliver what they think the deserts are.
It sounds like you may have some friction-studded history with Go. Any chance you can share your experience and perspective with using the language in your workloads?
It does. This is one of the initial reasons to create such tool. At the moment you can assemble native installers with jpackage (project must be Java based) https://jreleaser.org/guide/latest/reference/assemble/jpacka... or create a .deb file (does not bundle a Java runtime, project does not have to be Java based) https://jreleaser.org/guide/latest/reference/assemble/deb.ht...
Pimps dying is great. The government should arresting, convicting and executing way more of them.
Energy in Oregon isn't much more expensive than in Texas
His sentence was severe in part because he fell under the "kingping statute". This is based on the amount of drug trade he facilitated, the amount of money he made, and the actions he took as an "organizer". The hits didn't help.

> For conviction under the statute, the offender must have been an organizer, manager, or supervisor of the continuing operation and have obtained substantial income or resources from the drug violations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuing_Criminal_Enterprise...
They most they can do is to remove your posts and/or ban you from actively participating in that one subreddit. But you can obviously still read it if you log out. So they don't sound very dangerous to me
It will be interesting to see how AWS responds. Jump on board, or offer up a competing vision otherwise their cloud risks being perceived as being left behind in terms of computing power.
The room is possible because there's someone inside with a big list of rules of what Chinese characters to reply with. This represents the huge amount of data processing and statistical power. When the thought expt was created, you could argue that the room was impossible, so the experiment was meaningless. But that's no longer the case.
So why not properly charge him then?

Do you not think the optics are a bit weird when you sentence someone to life for something relatively small, but the reason is another crime you’re very sure he did but you didn’t bother to charge him with?
These are gorgeous. Can't go past this without a heads-up for Greg Egan's 2014 short story Seventh Sight, where the protagonists hack their (at the time bleeding-edge tech) eye implants, allowing them to be part of a vanishingly-small group of people that can see into the infrared and ultraviolet.
Even inside Java, projects like quarkus don’t receive fast adoption because Spring is the “professional” way to work.
Spring developer experience is awful, I miss hot reload.
I think it was removed by geohot when he was in the house, but then reinstated after a while. I remember him railing against it.
Neither Obama nor Biden would ever pardon Assange, because it would not win them any votes with the constituencies they are really after. At least Manning carried some trans votes.
My understanding is that it’s more Trump generally attempts to keep campaign promises, he doesn’t always succeed, but when all it takes is an executive order, he generally does it pretty quickly.

In instances where it takes more than his signature (e.g. the wall) he has failed to make good on many promises but he definitely put in effort to trying to make them happen.
Thank you, Colin! Now you mention it, it makes so much sense that you use Parinfer yourself. The implementation is so great and doesn't feel quirky to me (or maybe I just got used to the quirks).
Your concern is reasonable.

According to DOD, Tencent - which published this model - is a Chinese military company

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9q78wn9g8zo
All even numbers are plural ;-)
Right, but if 55% is avg over the last few years, “buy stock” is going to be correct more than not.

https://www.crestmontresearch.com/docs/Stock-Yo-Yo.pdf
Right. I'm not claiming the LLM has visual imagination - I suspect that OP has it, and that ChatGPT was trained on enough text from visual thinkers implicitly conveying their experience of the world, that it's now able to correctly interpret writing like that of OP's.
>This is the fundamental error of suicidal empathy. That tolerance of the deranged and dangerous few can be kept a separate discussion from the freedom and safety of the many. These are oppositional forces. The more antisocial behavior you excuse, the further families will retract into their protective shell. And suddenly there are no longer children around in the public city space or any appetite for public transit.

Is David becoming more Chinese? This is the exact mentality of Chinese society. Probably Japanese as well.

I've always said that Republicans should love the Chinese government. It's what they're aiming for.
Yeah I meant more like some shady fentanyl that overdoses people en masse, not some rather harmless and sometimes even beneficial weed.

The worst part are weapons, there is no way to spin it as something benign. Victor Bout for example got 25 years and there was no drug smuggling nor contract murders.
Well I don't know if it's universally true for every single cheat, but cheat makers do in fact offer refunds/compensation if your account gets banned. As ths simplest example:

https://battlelog.co/forums/topic/12037-sorry-frost-you-can-...

(Frost is one of the owners of the site that sells cheats - he offers refunds and compensation whenever anyone has issues with their cheats)
> I hate ads, but I’m not paying for YouTube Premium either. That’s how it goes. I get ads.

No that's not how it goes. You get Ublock Origin and then you don't get ads. Simple as that.

If you don't like ads and don't fight against them it means you accept ads and want to see more of them shoved down our collective throat. At least from the perspective of marketers and industries who rely on ads. That's how we ended up in this predicament in the first place. Lazy compliance.

If Youtube isn't sustainable without ads, it should die so that natural selection can take over and so that a better ecosystem can finally take its place. Every single "Youtuber" hates the platform, mostly because it has zero transparency being a Google product. The viewers hate it too because it constantly takes down their favorite videos and creators and because it's full of ads.

The only reason it's (still) the main site for hosting videos is quite literally just ad-fueled inertia due to the intrinsic cost of hosting videos. If ads didn't exist the only sustainable solution would be something less centralized like Peertube. And to me that's a desirable outcome.
Just to raise the number from 0, I did exactly that. The post-doc was in a research institute, a department that focused on usability. It seemed worthwhile to learn how to really do user tests and usability evaluations in practice, in the best way possible academically (or so I thought) but with real enterprise projects. Contrasted a lot with the quite theoretical PhD.

We can always argue about whether it was worthwhile ofc. Moneywise, definitely not (though the pay wasn't all that bad compared to industry compensation in my countries). But I learned what I wanted to learn, and the issues the position had were speficic to the place, not the concept of the position, if that makes sense.
So if you filter out the Republican owned ones or whatever your bugbear is, does the 55% persist?
This burden is what prompted me to create JReleaser in the first place as I also wanted to release a JavaFX application without instructing people to clone a repository and build the app themselves.

Because JReleaser is a release tool and not a build tool you are free to build however it’s needed, collect all artifacts and release them. I do this for the Ikonli JavaFX browser: build the app with Gradle which bundles platform specific JARs, then release them with JReleaser.

https://github.com/kordamp/ikonli Shows how it can be done. Requires building with GH Actions in multiple platforms.
And I think there's also a psychological angle here, for instance when people see that something claims to be zero sugar or low carb, it can trigger a sense of relief or permission to indulge.
ShipMySaaS is live on Product Hunt: Next.js boilerplate for building robust SaaS
Hi HN!

I’m excited to share ShipMySaaS, a professional grade SaaS boilerplate designed to help developers build production-ready SaaS applications quickly and efficiently.

What is ShipMySaaS?

ShipMySaaS provides a robust foundation for building SaaS platforms, leveraging Next.js for the frontend and Wabe a scalable backend-as-a-service I developed for the backend.

It comes packed with features to help developers hit the ground running:

- Authentication and database management
- Auto-generated GraphQL CRUD APIs
- Payment integration, email handling, and file storage
- A clean, scalable, and secure architecture built with quality in mind.

Why ShipMySaaS?

I built ShipMySaaS to address a gap I noticed while developing SaaS platforms: many existing boilerplates are rushed, lack long-term support, and prioritize speed over quality. ShipMySaaS is different:

Focus on professional-grade quality: Every aspect is designed with scalability, reliability, and maintainability in mind.
Save time without cutting corners: It eliminates repetitive setup work while maintaining a high standard of code quality.
Built for production: ShipMySaaS is tailored to handle real-world SaaS workloads, so you can focus on innovating instead of troubleshooting.

How You Can Help

ShipMySaaS is now live on Product Hunt(https://www.producthunt.com/posts/shipmysaas)! I’d love your feedback and support to make it even better.

Check it out on Product Hunt and give it an upvote if you find it valuable.
Share your thoughts your feedback is incredibly valuable to me.

Thanks for taking the time to check it out! Let’s build something amazing together.

Link of the website: https://shipmysaas.com
See, the thing about Arsenal is they always try to walk it in.
> I believe in reality a not guilty verdict is, we didn't have the evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt this person committed the crime.

That’s a description of the Scottish “not proven” verdict, not a “not guilty” verdict.
Ah yes, I'd like three cake please, and 5 cup of coffee.
Sure, but then you should have to have a conviction on those other crimes. It’s strange to consider stuff that wasn’t proven. If the crime was committed and the state is sure, they should charge him and then use the first conviction in the sentencing for the second, if they want to.
Oh that is a nice writeup. We have something similar in mind at work. Will forward it.
There were no victims of his conduct.

The idea that possession of drugs is or should be illegal is purely arbitrary, and is used thus to justify massive violations of human rights. It is literally insane that the state claims authority over what you are allowed to do to your own body.

No victim, no crime.
Literally no one does this in the industry, even if it sounds like a great idea on paper. Every big publisher knows that cheaters always bring negative cashflow to your company because they put off other players from playing. A single cheater in a 20 player game can put half of them off playing again, tarnishing your reputation at the same time. There is no universe in which "we'll just make cheaters buy our game again" makes any financial or any other sense - the goal is to get them to stop playing, permanently, and be enough of a pain in the ass that they never buy your game again.

>> so what a few legit people got wrapped up, enough buy back the equation

I've never seen any data that would support this. It just doesn't happen - if you accidentally ban a legit player they just get really pissed off and there's about 0% chance they will give you money again. Which is why you try extremely hard to not do that.
I just wanted to comment that there is no browser automation tool called Puppet when I found out there's a scraper thing that allows entering natural language description for the task (probably using LLM and Puppeteer under the hood). Given that this is quite obscure I guess they indeed mixed it up with Puppeteer.
But they chose a solution (if I understand correctly), where tenant ID is not in the signature of functions that use it, either.
Trump's Executive Order Against Trans Technically Makes Every American Female
Victor Bout is free and selling weapons again with the blessing and release of the US government. Always was about profiting off of weapons. Don't believe what the US really got from it was one ditzy WNBA player.
Huh, interesting. For me that often dreamed up artist and songs.
Because falsifying history seems worse than restricting meth production, at least to me.

Though I see no reason whatsoever why LLM should be blocked from answering "how do I make a nuclear bomb?" query.
How is it negated?

If he did a crime that’s strictly less bad than a murder, him being sentenced to a longer sentence than even a single murderer shows that something is wrong. It doesn’t matter if 99% of murderers actually get longer sentences.
If we take this definition, which is a lot less conspiratorial than the association I've had with the term, it refers to influential longstanding politicians that kept a low profile and out of the media for the most part.
> Can somebody give me a rational take on why?

Investigations are annoying to people who were behind the President at his inauguration.
Shor’s algorithm can. What is speculative about that?
Consider submitting an article titled "all you need is considered harmful"
Isn't it more likely a reaction to xAI now having the most training compute?
President Trump Signs Executive Order Revoking Biden-Era EV Targets
He was serving 2 life sentences + 40 years, not one. Even the prosecutors only asked for 20. What he did was wrong, but the sentence was disproportionate. The judge intended to throw away his life to make a point.
When someone comes in to slash everything, they generally don't bother understanding what they are slashing. This is the same as when a company hires someone to come in and cut costs, generally everything, good or bad, gets cut. That's what's happening on the US federal level right now. Eventually some things will be picked back up when someone realizes that it wasn't a good idea to stop it, but most things are just going to be wasted effort.
Unlike California, Texas is easy to build in. True for both renewable energy and housing.
Whatever problems or limitations the existing approach had dropping everything on the floor is one of the least helpful ways of trying to fix it (assuming good intent).
4 competing in-house libs? How can that ever happen? Is middle management non-existant? That is anarchy, hehe
I've enabled it. I cannot find any practical use for it. At least this AI is as unobtrusive as it is useless, unlike most other instances of AI, which are annoying and useless.
Impressive. I'm sure it will help tons of people dealing with lack of focus.
As are all primes!
> Not everything is an XY problem

Pretty close, though.