skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Using RTL doesn’t necessarily result in large binaries. In my (non-WASM) experience, they’re more in line with the “hundreds of kilobytes” flohofwoe suggests.
Oh, it's CGI? I wanted to know who your housecleaner was and if I could borrow them. ;) So much cat hair...
This seems to be most peoples take on it, not to mention China actually did the thing and made the episode real life. le sigh
It's still a fallacy, though. I hope we can agree on that part. If you have something map-reducing audio to timestamps of fallacies by who said them it makes it gamified and you can use the information shown to decide how much weight to give to their words.
It's a good thing there are no anime adaptations of his work, except for Uzumaki which only has a single episode.
Now you need to tell him also what ISS is
I'm reacting to your statement "...might feel good but that accomplishes nothing. Instead of complaining online..."

Complaining online is the only hope we have.
I'm not sure what this means. The Supreme Court will side with data because it is wealth and power? What side is an inanimate object on?
is there any desire for residential 10g service? it's pretty hard to image how 90% of families would use up 200meg
This seems more like a coup in developing countries as time goes by.
Are you comfortable to send your personal/company code data to a Chinese company (ByteDance)?
Oh, I like that, tough on crime! It's a novel idea. I wish the Nixon and Reagan administrations had thought of that a few decades ago, maybe if they did we could be witnessing the brilliant effects of that sort of policy today!
How do you accomplish silver colored lighting?
Trump fires people via tweets, so it's not as simple as you might dismiss. Trump likes whoever is in the room with him at the time. Once they leave, he won't even remember their name, but Musk will still be there buzzing in his ear
If you can bring that to kiosk and you live close enough to drive there, the problem is already solved. Even a radio bridge could do.
I’m willing to believe. It’s probably the closest we’ve come to actually having a real life god. I’m going to get pushback on this but I’ve used o1 and it’s pretty mind blowing to me. I would say something 10x as intelligent with sensors to perceive the world and some sort of continuously running self optimization algorithm would essentially be a viable artificial intelligence.
Can we all stop pretending that they don't abuse of their power and hold your deepest darkest secrets indefinitely? Even though most of us are law abiding citizens.

Can we please start making open hardware without Apple/google backdoors and stop pretending our systems are "secure".

Can we please write all software in Rust and stop using languages that weren't designed for security. Yes C is beautiful. Yes it also lets you shoot yourself in the foot.

Can we please use distributed systems to avoid censorship or holding our private information in the hands of the rich?
We used to have the fairness doctrine but it was repealed
What's there to celebrate?

To your point, nothing. This was during the .com bomb. "Leadership" in many companies did a lot of cringe inducing things. This was just one of many examples. They also celebrated a 5 for 1 reverse stock split with Champagne. It was a running trend.
> These are advanced computer skills IMO

To set up? Yes. Absolutely. But that's equivalent to asking users to install a filesystem before using the machine :) Past installation, it's "write text. It shall appear"

Nobody needs to hand-edit HTML any more. It has become, for better or worse, the assembly language of information design ;)

> The time and complexity savings for authoring and publishing afforded by this model, for me, satisfactorily offsets whatever could be said that it misses in the aesthetic or funcional department

I'm curious. Are you saying the boxes are helping you author/publish (in which case, please say more!), or am I wildly misunderstanding?

> As far as experience and perceptions can be trusted, I believe serial multimedia has been proved as a viable format.

Absolutely. But it doesn't create meaning by itself. It's merely a well-understood and simple way of organizing information. (I should've added "linear" to "tree" and "grid")

And just having a pre-defined structure doesn't give meaning in general. You'll need to conform to it, and you need to deal with the parts that just won't conform. (soft/hard links exist to satisfy a need, if we want to go back to file systems)

> I'd love to hear more. Feel free to ping me anytime if this is a subject you find exciting to discuss!

I just might take you up on that ;) The topic's near and dear to my heart. (Alas, it is not my main occupation, so... feel free to ping as well. I might fall off the face of the earth from time to time ;)
> What I want is to be able to write lyrics as easily as plaintext, ... while also being able to "fork" lyrics at a point and be able to work on different threads, keep track of alternative lyrics on a phrase level too.

made me think of how sometimes i use ide "code folding" features to see just the first lines of a series of easily collapsable lists of text blocks
If the creators read this, AIDEs are now common enough that HN readers will want to know any notable differences vs. the options above, Windsurf, Cline + Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct running locally, etc.
> i don't agree that debt is the problem

Totally fair, by no means is that a settled issue. Debt is just my opinion of a likely root cause.

> there are lots of redistributions that are net beneficial even when you account for the incentive hit. marginal increases in the estate tax, for instance, almost certainly fall under this umbrella

That requires a lot more context to answer. The costs and benefits considered are important to lay out. Without that context I really can't say if it's a net benefit or not, I would assume that two average people would have a different list of factors they'd consider when saying whether its a net benefit or not.

Personally I don't see estate taxes as net beneficial. I don't agree with the principle that death is a taxable event, and I don't prefer the government to have in incentives to see people die (i.e. when someone with an estate dies the government makes money). Financially, to stick with just the numbers, I don't consider $66B in annual revenue worth the bureaucracy or legal complexity required to manage the estate tax program.
No direct access, but we have a custom report builder tool in the (internal) web app that lets users write SQL queries (SELECT only) against a read-only replica of the production database. They can name and save those, even put them in their navigation menu.
Pretty sure a bunch of statistics that might be used to argue against Republican talking points are going to disappear or not be updated. Maybe they won't even get to be collected. It's a lot easier to lie if you prevent scientists and health care professionals from undercutting you with inconvenient truths.

As someone who has worked in public health and epidemiology, this kind of open ended restriction is extremely concerning.

Also appears to undercut the whole free speech thing that President Trump supposedly supports, and that the constitution provides for in the first amendment.
If your model of Donald Trump is "cartoonishly evil and incapable of empathy", then yes, of course you need to adjust your model – but that's a bad description of Adolf Hitler, too. He genuinely cared about the welfare of certain people, and opposed smoking because of the harm it caused those people: if you pegged Hitler as generally pro-death, you'd be wrong. But that does not in any way redeem him, and it shouldn't cause you to update your "Hitler wants to kill a whole bunch of people" prediction.

Suppose it's 1940. You know that Hitler ordered Aktion T4, and conclude that Hitler wants to kill people. Then, you learn that he opposes smoking because he doesn't like it killing people. You shouldn't start doubting that he's the sort of guy to sign mass death warrants: you've learned some information about his internal thought processes, but it's not very useful information if you want to predict his future actions.

"Orthogonal" is subjective. All things are interrelated. That does not mean that our descriptions should be highly-sensitive to noise. Update your internal model of his behaviour, by all means, but if you have predictions that don't require that internal model, consider whether or not this evidence should actually affect those predictions.
I’d find that quite humiliating

Same. I don't know if its that these companies don't know how to do this professionally or if they get off power tripping over people and humiliating them.
> Another consequence of the communications pause, according to an NIH staffer involved with clinical trials at NIH's Clinical Center, is that agency staff cannot meet with patient groups or release newsletters or other information to recruit patients into trials. Another unknown is whether NIH researchers will still be allowed to submit papers to peer-reviewed journals.

That seems unnecessary at best.
Doing it with hanging lamps is a clever solution. Doing it indirectly is the goal. There's one company out of the UK making super high end LED diffusers that can be precisely controlled - both the amount of light and the direction. Can't remember the company but it was similar to this: https://www.acalbfi.com/technologies/photonics/optical-compo...
Tailwind CSS v4.0
Yeah, that worked out phenomenally with US-china trade agreements!
> a claim about what statements about God are possible must ultimately be grounded in God's nature itself

Ah, so you're saying that the original statement "Nothing true can be said about God from a posture of defense" (call this statement "O") is self-defeating not because it applies to itself, but because it applies to one of its (lower-order) premises (call it "P"), which is itself about God? This is different than your original argument "The statement itself is a claim about God" but we can go with this as well.

I think your new argument relies on that premise P being made "from a posture of defense," otherwise O doesn't apply. I don't see any evidence of this being the case, so I don't think your argument is correct.

In other words, two conditions need to be satisifed for P to apply to a given assertion:

1) The statement must be about God.

2) The statement must be made from a posture of defense.

P doesn't satisfy (1) and O doesn't (have to) satisfy (2). Am I wrong, or what am I missing here?
> Even more troubling to many researchers is a pause on study sections that many received word of today. Without such meetings, NIH cannot make research awards.

Cancer and many other topics of research will be hurt by this.
It’s highly questionable if wildlife and habitat protection had the same level of political support if most people would only knew the affected animals from photos and nature documentaries. Zoos can have a lasting impact on people.
Ask HN: What do you read to keep up with AI?
Is there an HN type website to keep up with all the developments, new jargon, etc.?
None of this is necessary, that's the point.
If you trust the election results, and I generally do because I have no proof otherwise, then the American people voted for this. But it certainly looks like an authoritarian power transfer.
> I found it took a while to get to the point.

You're just a great understandeour

> I agree that adding an "array" style of directory to our file systems would be really cool.

I think this is sort of a low-hanging fruit people have slept on. We've proved list-based systems are extremely versatile for data structures (s-expr) and programming (lisps). What about for media in general? Everywhere I look I just see lists, with very minor stylistic distinctions between them. Of course there're abysmal infrastructural differences between chats, feeds and what not, but it does not invalidate a universal list-based frontend, similar to what you developed in your comment.
Tax. The missing link is those educated people pay it back with their tax. And/or contributions to the economy.

Also part of this is making education better bang for buck.

You can say who's gonna pay for it for everything. Defense and meddling in world affairs is a big cost too.
Android, sure. There's still AOSP and there are a few niche devices dedicated to being as close to Open Hardware as we could be.

>Can we please write all software in Rust and stop using languages that weren't designed for security.

I'm all for it. But very few people want to pay for talent that can properly rewrite that legacy C/++ codebase into proper Rust.
I can't tell if your being sarcastic or actually serious, because nobody is rewriting everything in Rust.
Free speech, states rights, government accountability, any serious sense of libertarianism and so on are all with the caveat of “if I like it” as far as the current Republican Party is concerned.
I should probably have mentioned that there already exists FUSE-based JSON FS mounters, for example this one is 13 years old:

https://github.com/calebcase/jsonfs
Sorry but this is just incorrect on many fronts. I can speak to this issue as a former engineer on Google Fiber so I got to see just how the sausage was made.

Existing national ISPs just have inbuilt advantages that a newcomer cannot replicate or can't replicate cheaply. This is the result of decades of lobbying state and local governments.

Take something as simple as where you run cables in the streets. You basically have two choices: you dig trenches or you string up cables on a pole. There is no best answer here as it depends on a lot of factors like weather and climate, local soil conditions, natural disaster risks (eg wildfires, earthquakes), distances involved and existing infrastructure and legislation.

So imagine in a given area trenching is uneconomical. This could be just because there's a lot of limestone rock in the soil so it's difficult, slow and expensive to actually dig the trenches and this may be complicated by local noise ordinances, permitting, surveying, existing trenches and so on. So you end up stringing up cables on poles.

Who owns those poles? Is it the city? Is it AT&T? You may have rights to string up cables on those poles but the devil really is in the details. You might have to apply for a permit for each and every pole separately. They might be approved by the city but then how does the work happen? Can you do it? Maybe. But you might need AT&T (or whoever) to do something first like move their own cables. Maybe several other companies have to move cables first. Maybe each company has 90 days to do that work and this can add up so it can take over a year just to be able to put a cable up on a pole. And you can't really do any work until all the poles are available. That's just how fiber works.

And where do you run the fiber too? Do you run it back possibly several miles to a POP? There are advantages in that but obvious disadvantages like cost and just overall cable size and weight. Or do you use local substations? If so, what kind of building is that? Is it a large building that residents find "ugly" and object to on aesthetic grounds or maybe even environmental grounds that means more delays? How much does that cost? Is AT&T grandfathered in with their substations and nodes?

And then after you've done all that and you have your last mile fiber, how many customers do you get? Roughly 30-40% of houses get fiber by how many companies are you splitting that pool with? You have to amortize your entire network build over your projected customer base and it makes a massive difference if it's 10% of dwellings or 15% or 30% or 40%.

In industry parlance this is called an "overbuild" and is inherently economically inefficient. It'll actually raise the cost of every ISP because each will get a lower overall take up rate.

That's why the best solution is municipal broadband that either provides service or acts as a wholesaler to virtual ISPs.

The cost of running a fiber cable from a POP to a house has only gone up over th eyears and it's the majority of your cost. That's really why Internet costs haven't come down. And also why the best Internet in the US is municipal broadband and it isn't even close.
I'm not sure what your point is. Newspapers shouldn't be able to say whatever they want.
Or to put it another way, "The cruelty is the point."
> Also appears to undercut the whole free speech thing that President Trump supposedly supports

Saying he supports "free speech" and actually doing it are two different things. In reality he supports speech that supports his preferred narrative of reality and opposes speech that doesn't.
I found this video interview of the founder of the Peeple app. What stands out is how badly she wants it to be a "positive" app, pretty much hiding and doing away with any type of negative ratings or negativity. But if everybody is so great then what's even the point? How do you point to someone's bad behavior to help them improve it? It might be possible that the person might not even know they're doing anything wrong in the first place. Others might be too scared to say something or just don't want to in person. There's also the issue of safety, I tell someone they've wronged me, they feel wronged for me telling them and now my face is punched....tangent video below

https://youtu.be/03DJkpzP-7Y?si=BYMtINM9VN1BXY7f
Pixelfed (Fediverse alternative to Instagram) raises CA$50k in 13 hours
The overarching goal seems to be "Achieve more, more efficiently, with fewer resources".

But making that happen when there are 20+ levels of management between the guy doing the work and the guy making the rules seems impossible.
> The trick is, meat is actually fairly low in calories and protein (meat) is extremely filling.

What? Meat, from fish to chicken to beef, is one of the most caloric foods, rivaled only by nuts and oils. Meat usually is high in fat, it's very hard for it to be low-calorie. The weight loss doesn't come from a low-calorie diet, but from forced ketosis due to prolonged lack of glucose.

As others hace said, it's the carb deprivation that makes you lose weight, you could easily do a vegetarian diet and lose the same or more weight without abusing fat and rising your bad cholesterol.
then we need NotepadPlusPlusJs!
Yeah but still seems relevant when complaining there are too many options and praising the n+1 option
I am affected by this and I didn't vote for this. It's easy to say that "the American People" voted for this, but it's not correct to say that I am personally being affected by my bad choices.

I think the elections were "fair", for what its worth- I just don't agree that "fairness" makes me blame-worthy when I face the consequences of other folks actions.
I agree up until golden hour. It's a very specific style of lighting and isn't any better or worse. It's not the best time to take a picture, it doesn't have the best light. It's a specific kind of light.
Voluntary identity verification and reputation systems work well for things like Uber or Airbnb because users want to buy and sell services, so there's a straightforward economic justification for the trust.

How do you get people to use it for things that aren't (supposed to be) straightforward economic activity like dates, without being accused of facilitating prostitution?

I know Uber or Airbnb can be misused, but you need at least a car or room to participate on those platforms.
Authoritarian power transfers usually involve (immediate) executions, or at least the imprisonment/exile of important people from the previous government/administration/regime, to stabilize the new regime: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Logic_of_Political_Surviva...
We already tried fixing problems with throwing tax money at them. It didn't work out. You can see the result of socialism in Russia, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela and where not. Wars do not start because of scarcities. Wars start because of disbalance of power. And it is very important for the Western world to be ahead in the AI, because otherwise China may cause a real war and then a lot of Western people would die. Do you not care about them?
I mean ice are definitely going to be banned sooner or later. For everyones sake it should be sooner
Hmm, good point. Maybe it wasn't whataboutism. It could just as well be sealioning.
my guess is when doing college applications, you figured you had to do something special to get into a good college, so you decided to do this lol

Doesn't matter why, pretty sick. I'm studying physics myself, so its pretty inspiring to see you do this
Here's a really excellent piece on the guts of how NIH's processes work:

https://theinfinitesimal.substack.com/p/distinguishing-real-...
I just listened to an NPR newscast where they were clutching at their pearls and then whispered “this is common when a new administration comes in” and then went right back to screeching. Not looking forward to 4 years of this.
One of my favorite winter fireside poems as a child.

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/45081/the-cremation-o...
There are very many universities with zero or no tax, most of them in socialist countries. Why don't you go there? Maybe because none of those matter when serious education is considered.
Oh, or:

- Concurrently enroll at a community college (a really great option that I think every country should have)
Chris Tarbell states that there are logs about 6 imaginary "murder of hire"'s .. none of which actually took place, two were faked by the FBI(?) and four were scams run by third parties outside the USA.

In the absence of any other context it's assumed these were acts of "intent to murder" but that's about it .. logs that look like a duck and probably were a duck.

But no actual murders that anyone could find, no bodies, etc.
Yes we should be able to view it. This restriction doesn't prevent us from viewing these creators or their videos. It DOES mandate that it is sold to a US-based company.

Allowing a foreign adversary to consistently pump in propaganda just isn't something that should be protected by free speech... You, a citizen, are allowed to go find whatever media your heart desires. A foreign power is NOT allowed to force feed your propaganda. How is that not clear?

Free speech protects our ability to not be prosecuted for saying or viewing something controversial. Why on earth would that same protection be extended to a foreign power?!
For anyone that's been in corp/BigCo land for some time, this is the typical corp reboot playbook.

Pause all hiring, freeze travel and other casual expenditures, relook at all major initiatives/projects/programs, etc.

Definitely something (IMHO) worth doing every 5-7 years in any environment. Can't imagine what it will uncover in government where I'm guessing it hasn't happened in much longer in most cases.
If you've worked as a scientist, why not gather evidence before jumping to conclusions? For example, you could inquire of the administration why they did this. They're actually putting in quite an effort at transparency.
I used to work in the optical industry, that's not what computer glasses are, they are just blue blocker lenses.
Thank you so much — yes, that was the hardest part of this entire project! I spent 2 months getting eDP working (second PCB thankfully).

I had the honor of learning high speed signaling from the best. I met some super cool people from Silicon Valley and research universities (from past work, like the MUREX Ethernet Switch). The ZMK Firmware community too!
I tried CUDA on Fedora 41 (no quotes) and got exclusively results around Fedora 41 without any changes required, weird.
I love being unplugged from friends like that. Then when I see them I have something to talk about and catch up on.
Literally nothing public, unfortunately. I just got some private chats and slack groups where i interact in once in awhile.