skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't particularly disagree. Although it's worth noting that people don't typically pick embedded languages because they're familiar with the embedded language per se, but instead because they (1) are easy to integrate, and (2) resemble the syntax/semantics of the embedding language. Rhai appears to satisfy both, so I can understand why someone would pick it.

(I don't have a dog in this fight; I'm not a user of either Lua or Rhai.)
Yeah this, and you need to give them your full address because you have to enter a code that is sent via (physical) mail. Also it has the "Datenautomatik" enabled by default where new data packages are bought automatically when the limit is reached but you can turn this off (it's on by default).
Altair-upset: The Evolution of UpSet plots in Altair
What kind of travel bans are you expecting?
Now that I think of it, Sourceforge is perhaps the first good example of enshittification in this domain that I can think of.

The thing about enshittification is, first you need to eyeballs and brand, before you can sully it. Sourceforge was great for a while.
All GP and I are trying to point out is that the average commute, depending on city, is somewhere between 15-40 minutes and is normally distributed.
The best and easiest option because your spouse is in H-1B status is to apply to change your status to dependent H-4 status using USCIS Form I-539. As long as this is filed during your grace period, you can remain in the U.S. while the application is pending/until it is approved.
I am filing an EB1-A petition with a law firm. The law firm says that based on their recent experience, EB1-A cases that have requested Premium Processing (PP) have a lower approval rate and a higher RFE rate.

While the statistic may be true, is there a causation between PP and RFE/denial or is it just that cases created in a rush with PP might simply get more RFE or denial?

Thanks
Adam Cadre’s games are excellent. https://adamcadre.ac/if/
Other posters have given the answer but here is the answer in an informative podcast released just over a month ago with some details on the development process from some ASML PR folks in San Diego (they have offices in the USA).

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/13/1212604208/asml-euv-extreme-u...
Paul Schrader on AI-Produced Scripts: 'Every Idea ChatGPT Came Up with Was Good'
AnyWhere and Happy to Relocate
Introduction video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCS-8T_puLM
Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~01e85237cfcbf2a91c
Youtube Channel I post tutorials in JavaScript:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVhfcCbJSpvpHv-PkFfUM5Q}\ur... proves English fluency and programming expertise
I am Mahmoud Adel Khamis Soliman, Deep Learning Engineer plus
professional Full Stack Developer on using HTML, Vanilla CSS (FlexBox, Grid System, Animations and Transformations), Bootstrap, Angular (including Angular Material and Animations), Firebase (Cloud Firestore and Cloud Functions), RxJs and NgRx
Django REST, React, Redux
5 Years of experience, Worked on Projects:
GudCook - E-learning, Social Media
Web based Jasper Studio (Reliant Business Valuation), Check my CV for report video links.
Financial Spreading (Reliant Business Valuation).\newline
Real estate map locator using NgRx
https://map-ngrx.web.app/loadpins
My own streaming service projectStreaming Service Walkthrough as it's not live at the moment : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rx9ojs-zpdw&feature=youtu.be
Atmospheric wave energy of the Beirut explosion (2021)
> based on my belief that the brain is nothing special physics-wise and it doesn't manage to realize unknown quantum algorithms in its warm and messy environment

Agreed (well as much as intuition goes), but current gen AI is not a brain, much less a human brain. It shows similarities, in particular emerging multi-modal pattern matching capabilities. There is nothing that says that’s all the neocortex does, in fact the opposite is a known truth in neuroscience. We just don’t know all functions yet - we can’t just ignore the massive Chesterton’s fence we don’t understand.

This isn’t even necessarily because the brain is more sophisticated than anything else, we don’t have models for the weather and immune system or anything chaotic really. Look, folding proteins is still a research problem and that’s at the level of known molecular structure. We greatly overestimate our abilities to model & simulate things. Todays AI is a prime example of our wishful thinking and glossing over ”details”.

> so that classical computers can reproduce all of its feats when having appropriate algorithms and enough computing power.

Sure. That’s a reasonable hypothesis.

> And math reasoning is just another step on a ladder of capabilities, not something that requires completely different approach

You seem to be assuming ”ability” is single axis. It’s like assuming if we get 256 bit registers computers will start making coffee, or that going to the gym will eventually give you wings. There is nothing that suggests this. In fact, if you look at emerging ability in pattern matching that improved enormously, while seeing reasoning on novel problems sitting basically still, that suggests strongly that we are looking at a multi-axis problem domain.
Thanks for the input, would you recommend developing slam from scratch or start with some libraries and tailor it to my sensors?
> The supply chain for these machines is heavily dependent on the US

The supply chain for iPhones is heavily dependent on Chinese manufacturing.

We wouldn't normally expect Tim Cook to kowtow to the Chinese Communist Party, though.
I'm talking about Wave64.

CDNA executes 64-threads per compute unit per clock tick. RDNA only executes 32-threads. CDNA is smaller, more efficient, more parallel and much higher compute than RDNA.

Furthermore, all ROCm code from GCN (and older) was on Wave64, because historically AMD's architecture from 2010 through 2020 was Wave64. RDNA changed to Wave32 so that they can match NVidia and have slightly better latency characteristics (at the cost of bandwidth).

CDNA has more compute bandwidth and parallelism. RDNA is narrower, faster latency and less parallelism. Building a GPU out of 2048-bit compute (aka: 64-lanes x 32-bit wide/CDNA) is always going to be more bandwidth than 1024-bit compute (aka: 32-lanes x 32-bit wide) like RDNA.
It's good that you have flagged this potential issue but I can't advise since that's outside my area; you should consult an employment lawyer.
My canonical answer is "Violet" by Jeremy Freese:

https://ifdb.org/viewgame?id=4glrrfh7wrp9zz7b
It was respected in the sense that there was a need then in american manufacturing for engineering. But the compensation was nowhere near other professional class jobs. So really the respect seemed a bit false: to get people into the door pigeonholed so they can’t leave for higher compensation. Then when manufacturing was outsourced after the 1960s, many of these jobs disappeared. Now people in Guanzhou are designing the factories and process controls.
Check the reviews online, but generally random bits of Go code are presented with no build-up or explanation. B Trees are implemented immediately and without explanation. The book is incredibly short and seems just like a loose collection of notes, rather than an actual book. Very interested to check out the new version
Even media created with MS's own USB imager didn't work with my DIY build. May be related to Asus' UEFI but there's no proper diagnostic facility to know. I said screw it, and used Rufus to bypass any MS nonsense at the same time.

And how? The same way SIM locks did. EU made them illegal not without reason.
type SomeProcessState =
// when waiting for user interaction
| 'idle'
// busy processing
| 'busy'
// finished processing
| 'success'

const OtherProcessStates = Object.freeze({
/**
Waiting for user interaction
*/
Idle: 0,
/**
Busy processing
*/
Busy: 1,
/**
Finished processing
*/
Success: 2,
} as const)
type OtherProcessState = typeof OtherProcessStates[keyof typeof OtherProcessStates]

The second form those are even working JSDOC comments.
I'd be mindful that having a NATO partner be able to spy is maybe better than having Huawei spy if you have to choose, but yes, I think it's a risk that EU countries should be aware of and probably are more aware of than with social networks.
Good. As much as I don't like some things about China, but damn it they're really good at cutting down costs. I look forward to their version of Nvidia GPUs at half the price.
Sort of. Accessing private Canadian financing is a lot harder for the most part, our financial sector is notoriously risk averse for any sort of personal or business loans unless there's a path of guaranteed returns and you have a track record of getting those returns. Last time one of my bosses tried to get something like $2 million in raising funds with Canadian investors, they said that we needed to show I think at least $2 million in net profits for 4 or 5 years at least.

Public funding is easier to access in part because the people that are overseeing it usually don't understand or care to understand what it is they're overseeing. My boss in 2015 or so was presenting my regular IT work as research and development and somehow it worked.

It's not just in new business either. Canada has the lowest investments in business machinery like computers to improve productivity. I don't know what the friction in that regard but just to give you an example; the big name company I was working in 2023 retired the DLink Fast Ethernet switches that we were using as core networking for one of our labs. $200 to upgrade the component that was bottle necking 20+ employees was not worth it and I had to buy it out of my own pocket to demonstrate just how badly it was hampering. And this was after showing fancy power points on the financial impact of 20+ employees doing file transfers at 1/10th the speed they could be (not so much that they didn't have the money, they just didn't believe that an engineer could understand finances. Go figure).

I gotta run, but there's more I can comment on.
Same here its all trash, i stopped logging into X a couple months ago, its all political and hate speech now its nuts, i used to have funny meme's and general tech news and gaming news, nope not 1 of those things anymore its all political shit and people complaining at each other about random shit, oh and insane amounts of crypto
Weird to learn that the three Zork games were one game split, given that they're so tonally different. (the first having basically no narrative at all, the second being profoundly silly, and the third being fairly serious and dark)
You can just read the source? mixxx-deps come from a build process sourced from:

https://github.com/mixxxdj/vcpkg

The same binary-backed build process is present on Windows, too, presumably to keep people from needing to go through dependency hell to contribute to the project.
Listen, if you think I'm wrong then go profit off how wrong I am. You can put your money where your mouth is anytime you want.

That people are declining to do so is, I think, revealing.
So the way I've solved the multiple folders with independent checks is like this:

all-done:
name: All done
# this is the job that should be marked as required on GitHub. It's the only one that'll reliably trigger
# when any upstream fails: success
# when all upstream skips: pass
# when all upstream success: success
# combination of upstream skip and success: success
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs:
- calculate-version
- cargo-build
- cargo-fmt
- cargo-clippy-and-report
- cargo-test-and-report
- docker-build
- docker-publish
if: |
always()
steps:
- name: Fail!
shell: bash
if: |
contains(needs.*.result, 'failure') ||
contains(needs.*.result, 'cancelled')
run: |
echo "One / more upstream failed or was cancelled. Failing job..."

exit 1

- name: Success!
shell: bash
run: |
echo "Great success!"

That way it is resilient against checks not running because they're not needed, but it still fails when any upstream actually fails.

Now, I did end up running the tests of the front-end and back-end because they upload coverage, and if my coverage tool doesn't get both, it'll consider it as a drop in coverage and fail its check.

But in general, I agree with the writer of the post that it all feels like it's not getting enough love.

For example, there is no support for yaml anchors, which really hampers reusability on things that cannot be extracted to separate flows (not to mention separate flows can only be nested 4 deep).

There is also the issue that any commit made by GitHub actions doesn't trigger another build. This is understandable, as you want to avoid endless builds, but sometimes it's needed, and then you need to do the ugly workaround with a PAT (and I believe it can't even be a fine-grained one). Combine that with policies that set a maximum time limit on tokens, your build becomes brittle, as now you need to chase down the person with admin access.

Then there is the issue of Docker actions. They tell you to pin the action to an sha to prevent replacements. Except the action itself points to a replaceable tag.

Lastly, there is a bug where when you create a report for your action, you cannot specify the parent it belongs to. So your ESLint report could be made a child of your coverage report.
Double check me, but every source I can find says the average commute time in Los Angeles for working professionals is bang on 30 minutes.
All the time and there's no explicit revenue or funding requirement. In the O-1 context, the company-related requirements are minimal; it's much more about the applicant's/beneficiary's qualifications.
>I’m certain he wouldn’t be rude to my face, but he might quietly discriminate against me, say no thanks. He might not even think of it as discrimination, only that I don’t have what it takes.

>I’m better at my job than most. I’d be a better startup founder today than I was in 2015. None of that will matter.

IMHO, jumping to conclusions just like this is a big reason why 'going woke' isn't a healthy mindset for someone to hold. Stating that none of it matters is exactly the same thing as saying "I can't do it"
"Most software dev roles in the UK top out between £40 and £50k, £60k if you're lucky" was the comment I was replying to.

But I agree we don't compete with the USA. Even London struggles with that.
> I'm just not seeing the argument here

yeah, thats pretty clear. Because you choose to focus on cases where you do have agency to do something, e.g. its my discord and I am moving us to matrix - and goodbye to those who will not migrate.

Now think about an established group where you are a simple member and you say, "hey folks, why don't we move to something that is better for us, no ads, no data collection, etc."? And they look at you with glazed eyes, and... shrug, and that is the end of the conversation. Now what Don Quixote?

> What does an "entire country" have to do with it?

In countries with high facebook/meta adoption if you want up-to-date information about an event or an establishment it may only exist on meta platforms. Only larger entities can afford to have an independent website, and many such sites are typically in a state of disrepair and neglect.

As an individual trying to go against so-called network effects most of the time you have very little leverage. Its really fighting against wind mills.
> I would have invested significantly in catastrophic forgetting mitigations and built a model capable of continual learning.

You say it as if it's an easy thing to do. These things take time man.
I like the article, but one doesn't need to meet pg once to get to know what he is.

You can just read his tweets (x's?) and he, like many VCs or higher-ups in SV doesn't give a huge importance in how other humans feel, just in his kids/family/relatives.

So overall, he doesn't care about how you think or feel.

If he did, he wouldn't write an essay on a touchy topic without making a big disclaimer.

By reading him tweet for sometime you'd realize the kind of person he is, and he isn't somebody that is there to support others or something, or has threaded prejudice or huge issues in his life.

The deepest essay pg has written that touches the "They don't like me" point, from all I've read is his thoughts about nerds/geeks, after all we get bullied! You can't compare being a nerd to being transgender, or a victim of racism, or xenophobia. It's very different.

He just doesn't have studied, or suffered enough to understand the perspective of a "woke", then he wrote that article. AI engineers would say the problem with pg's llms didn't have enough training data ;-)
Money in a drawer doesn't really detract from any national investment. It's just paper.

It's the allocation of capital that matters. Land, machinery, and so on.

The extent of this is that if money sits in drawers not being spent, it represents diminished demand, which suppresses prices; the government can then print a corresponding amount of money to allocate capital towards other purposes. Leaving money in the drawer means delaying until another day your vote for how national resources should be allocated.
Well, at least you can build a 3D printer at home. I built mine years ago (https://lucasoshiro.github.io/hardware-en/2020-06-14-3d_prin...) nowadays you can even build a better one.
I'm completely lost on what your point is. What are you saying people should do, and to accomplish what?
I have not said that Deepseek models are bad. Quite the opposite. I'm impressed by them. I have just questiened that they are just some chinese startup.
> But this is absolutely what ecosystem grants/bounties should be for.

I'd be down to fund a bounty/grant for this (and I'm clearly not alone), if anyone is looking for booty :)
Microsoft Teams is perhaps the worst communication software your company can have for Software Engineers. People usually don't use the half-baked threads capabilities because they're separate and not intuitive, so it's usually just endless chat messages, all at once. And so you get constant pinging all day. And then I need to mute my Teams chats, which is also risky because I could have gotten an important message.
Yup, and that was done against one of our most loyal allies.
Hi Peter, thanks for doing this!

We have a co-founder who is from the UK. We are a Delaware company. Is there an easy way for 1/ paying him and 2/ taking SEIS investment from UK investors? Sorry if I'm misunderstanding what an immigration attorney knows about
In the long run I think realizations like the authors are healthy ones.

PG is not a hero. He's just a guy. A guy who entered into business transactions with a number of people, many of whom benefitted greatly (as did Paul himself). I'm not saying any of that as a negative! Just that we have a habit of attributing superhuman characteristics to folks (Obama getting the Nobel Peace Prize comes to mind) and ending up disappointed.

I'm not an affected group by any means but I still share the disappointment in the world we see today vs the possibilities I felt tech would allow when I was younger. The tech CEOs I previously viewed as visionaries now just look like a new generation of socially regressive robber barons. I wanted to be one of those CEOs, these days I'm still not quite sure what I want to be. My only consolation is knowing that I'm seeing the world more accurately than I once did.
Or, conversely, "Every idea ChatGPT came up with was no worse than the crap we come up with."
if if if would would would.

Dude, they found a way, until they did.
> That said, if anyone honestly believed it I don't see how they could not sit by and watch it happen.

And what, exactly, is someone supposed to do about it? Legally. Besides voting, obviously. That ship already sailed.
France's 2024 Power Grid Was 95% Fossil Free as Nuclear, Renewables Jumped
I quite dislike the hysterical rhetoric too. That being said, I get why people ascribe it to Donald Trump. I will never forget turning on the TV on Janurary 6th to see the President of the United States inciting a riot on government property that had already killed multiple people.

This is going to be a pretty miserable administration and I expect a complete reprieve of the "stop the steal" bitching and moaning that we sat through the first time around.
Yeah, at the core of it I see this as a value problem.

If you charge a lot, it's a tough or impossible sell for users who aren't yet sure they'll get that amount of value from it. If you charge too little, you're leaving money on the table from big customers who would be willing to pay much more.

Setting the up-front cost also requires you to estimate a bunch of things: what will it cost you to build (including future time to get to "feature complete" for this version), how many do you think you are going to sell, how much time is each customer going to take up? In other words: this is what you value your time at, but you can't know most of the numbers used ahead of time. You need this for subscriptions, too, but there's a bit more latitude to change, and you don't necessarily have any obligations should you decide to just stop at the end of the next billing cycle.

Longer term, there's also an incentive problem for you as the vendor. If you're very successful and saturate your market, why build new versions? Your incentive switches to making a "major" version with huge upgrades, which has a whole ton of downsides (which smart customers see, or learn the hard way). It's riskier than frequent, small releases: your first major real testing and feedback comes after a ton of massive changes. It incentives change for the sake of change (so you can justify a "major" version) as opposed to real improvements. Even fixing bugs becomes purely a cost, the only real incentives are pride/reputation, and hoping they'll buy the next major version.

Subscriptions help even this out, and tying the cost to some usage metric can make the cost reflect the value even more, even as the usage changes over time (eg: the customer grows).

The worst thing with subscriptions is when the cost doesn't reflect the value. If as a user, you pay $20/mo for something that enables you to make $2000/month, that's a no-brainer. When you have to pay $20/month for something that is useful 4 or 5 times a year, or when it's really hard to figure out what, if any, value you're getting for your money, that's when it becomes a problem.
Additional articles: https://www.sciencealert.com/last-year-s-blast-in-lebanon-wa... https://interestingengineering.com/science/the-beirut-explos...
If you are currently employed abroad by a related company, then the L-1 visa might be an option. If you are not, then - assuming that you are not from a country with its own visa, such as Australia, Canada, Chile, Mexico, and Singapore - the potential options are the E-1/E-2, H-1B, and O-1.
The AI Bubble Is Bursting
The CPU choice was changed last minute from AMD to Intel. Andy Grove and Bill Gates had a last minute phone call. The demo on the stage was still using AMD.
> Venture Capital: European VCs, mostly bullish on fintech and SaaS, remain wary of hardware. Result? A feedback loop of underinvestment and missed opportunities.

Um? We're pretty crap at SaaS too here in Europe.

The problem is just that venture capital is simply not really around in Europe. Part of that is better labour protections, you can't just start a firm and dump all your staff if it doesn't work out. I think that's a good thing too.

And really hardware is a China thing these days. The "designed in" is just a small part.

But Britain also has the Brexit problem. I'm glad I'm not British.
7 hours of sun in a month? How do you survive? I think I'd go crazy.
Heads up: This is/was a breaking change for folks using this with S3 compatible (but not S3) target storage systems.

Related:

Latest AWS SDK/CLI incompatible with S3 alternatives - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42740910 - Jan 2025

Config hotfix:

https://github.com/boto/boto3/issues/4400#issuecomment-26007...

s3_client = boto3.client(
's3',
endpoint_url=os.getenv('S3_ENDPOINT'),

config=Config(request_checksum_calculation="when_required", response_checksum_validation="when_required")
)