skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, the asshat is a bully. I have to be transparent and express that I have been an asshat as well, but hurt people hurt people (it is absolutely not an excuse). You have to recognize it.

All sins are done together, but I’ll try not to use such language as its inflammatory. We make the mistakes together, and we have to fix them together.
I wonder if the reason the models have problem with this is that their tokens aren't the same as our characters. It's like asking someone who can speak English (but doesn't know how to read) how many R's are there in strawberry. They are fluent in English audio tokens, but not written tokens.
It would suck then if the oligarchy comes for their 401ks.
The LLM can't, thats what makes it relatively difficult. The tokenizer can.

Run it through your head with character level tokenization. Imagine the attention calculations. See how easy it would be? See how few samples would be required? It's a trivial thing when the tokenizer breaks everything down to characters.

Consider the amount and specificity of training data required to learn spelling 'games' using current tokenization schemes. Vocabularies of 100,000 plus tokens, many of which are close together in high dimensional space but spelled very differently. Then consider the various data sets which give phonetic information as a method to spell. They'd be tokenized in ways which confuse a model.

Look, maybe go build one. Your head will spin once you start dealing with the various types of training data and how different tokenization changes things. It screws spelling, math, code, technical biology material, financial material. I specifically build models for financial markets and it's an issue.
I use the GPTMobile app on Android to access ollama over Tailscale.

https://github.com/chocydar/GPTMobile
What are my possibilities to work a tech job in the US (I do have a company that’s willing and able) but I don’t have a college degree, how likely is it that I can find a way.
thanks for letting everyone know you didn’t read it, we were all wondering about that :)
Plug/Unplug USBC PD?
I just got 13 rolls of 3 in a row. I think there may be an issue with the RNG
The current crop of tech billionaires seems fond of New Zealand and have been building bunkers there to escape from nuclear war or global warming or a peasant revolt or whatever. Maybe they'll build a university there as well?

https://www.vice.com/en/article/billionaires-are-building-lu...
https://usafacts.org/articles/how-many-americans-have-been-i...

"The most recent was the second impeachment of former President Donald Trump."

"What does impeachment mean?

Impeachment means charging a public official with misconduct. Like in the justice system, charges alone do not lead to consequences. Instead, there is a trial, during which the official is convicted or acquitted."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_impeachment_investigat...

While there have been demands for the impeachment of most presidents, only three — Andrew Johnson in 1868, Bill Clinton in 1999 and Donald Trump in 2019— have actually been impeached. A second impeachment of Donald Trump was adopted, making him the first US President to be impeached twice.
Heh, I also was inspired to implement the game with some major changes once the video popped up on youtube. I got it working but lost interest when it came to polishing the mapgen and generating interesting maps with the slope mechanic.
Right, and not everyone is perfect :) . As a manager myself, I find it difficult to background check (if you will) potential hires for this. 90% + of candidates have never contributed to an open source project to the extent of creating a PR.
Sorry about that. We are currently uploading the 671B MoE R1 model as well. We needed some extra time to validate it on Ollama.
401k’s? oligarch have 401k’s? you meant peasants who voted for them from Pennsylvania/Nevada/Georgia have 401k’s (few of them at least might…)?
Yeah, with benefits will be higher. Maybe 50% at most for gov jobs.
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. The courts will decide.
Thanks for explaining. How do you identify such byte patterns that are likely stable across builds? Is it experimental - i.e., look at a few versions of the binary and check if it has changed?
As a parent, this kind of behavior leads to escalation and is indicative of adolescents in grades K-6. Usually people grow out of it before they reach adulthood.

Our ability to suppress our desire for revenge is what makes society work.
New LiS solid-state battery with glass electrolyte can be charged in 1 minute
> trained the model on synthetic data

You get knowledge collapse [1] this way.

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03502
> there was nothing wrong with the old toolchains (hence the quotes). And of course, Ruff/uv can do what they do because they build on all that earlier knowledge

I don't think that's true. I think the old toolchains really were bad, partly because the Python community was uniquely resistant to building on what worked in other ecosystems, and uv in particular largely succeeds because it's the first tool in this space to finally just ignore the nonsense that had somehow become accepted wisdom in Python-land and apply a little bit of outside experience.
Let's add hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes, tsunamis, monsoons, etc. You're being intentionally obtuse.
What fascinates me most is not the protocol itself, but the potential to add a thin scripting layer (similar to Redis' EVAL or the newer modules API) to enable complex logic with atomic transactions and high QPS.

In the past, we relied heavily on using EVAL[SHA] with 200+ loc Lua scripts in order to implement high throughput, atomic transactions for realtime systems. We also used the JSON & Redis Query Language (previous named "full-text search") to build a more maintainable & strongly consistent system than using raw key-values and manually building secondary indexes.

We’ve since migrated to a native FoundationDB and SQLite hybrid setup, but this approach would have been really helpful for early-stage prototyping with a higher performance ceiling (thanks to FDB sharding) than a single-node Redis with AOF.

Related: Redis Cluster is a world of pain when handling clustering keys and cross-node queries and orchestration. DragonflyDB is chasing after the market of companies considering sharding Redis because of performance issues by providing better single-node performance. There's probably an alternative approach that could work by using an architecture like this.
An interesting point on religion and surely behind some of the push back. Mostly tho it's simply conflict with materialism priors. But the prohibition on psi among world religions is by no means universal: it's mostly Abrahamic; Hindu and Tao take a much more nuanced take. As do folk religions and native traditions, that are typically much more engaged.

Even so, prohibitions sometimes contain truths: the Jewish one against pork could prevent parasites. What if forbidding psi is similarly well intended? Opening awareness can be gnarly (the yoga and seeker paths in India know this), and it might happen that "when you see them, they see you" adding to difficulties. Even so, many things are difficult at first. But worthwhile things take effort.

That said tho: it's not as if religions are the paragons of virtuous behavior they may wish to be seen as, so it may not do to simply accept prohibitions on faith alone. And remember prohibitions evolve with time, even religious ones. Also, you cannot discount the possibility that not wanting to democratize access to the divine, or even spiritual, is simply about centralizing power and control.

Your point on advances in other collection is well taken tho! But some factual errors require correction: you don't need to be 'receptive to psi' to have it work, just try (unless faith precludes you to, and I don't suggest violating what you believe); also it's not 'subjective' in the sense you want - it's people looking at data, and they're interpreting it. That's the subjectivity, and that's like every analysis ever.

It helps to consider it just another sensor, or sense organ, or skill. It's not supposed to be sole source. It's not pretending to be infallible. Can you sink 100 3 pointers in a row? Not even the best NBA can all the time, every human skill is dynamic and on a bell curve. Regarding philosophical prohibitions, consider like access to data to help you make better choices.

How about an analogy? You are a person looking at a wall. Along the wall walks a caterpillar. It goes from left to right. Standing where you are, you can see its objective. Some tasty leaf sprouting from a gap a few feet away. The caterpillar senses it, but does not see as clearly as you - if for no other reason than your 3D perspective - from on the wall, it can really only grasp a small way in front. What the caterpillar doesn't see is a large vertical crack, impossibly to pass, that breaks its path just ahead. You tho, do see that crack. Because of your perspective. You see the little guy heading towards it, whereas if he just took 30 degrees to the right he'd be able to go around it. From where he is tho, he can't see it. So without the knowledge of another perspective, without other data, the little guy is gonna waste more time. And might even run into trouble in the big crack!

That's like psi. Dive in! Unless your beliefs about risk preclude that - in which case I'd say, be more careful, because those prior beliefs could cause you to have ideas which would get in the way and might be challenging for mental health.

Anywho, thanks for your fun reply! :)
It is.

The QR codes that provision the eSIM are single-use.

Most "real" carriers will of course let you migrate your eSIMs, with varying degrees of pain involved (my Japanese eSIM migrated automatically from iPhone to iPhone; the German one involved making a phone call); but ~all "travel plans" eSIMS will be single-use only.
> How do you read me comment and take away that I still dont know what Astral is?

The comment where you literally say "I have never heard of astral"? Gee, I wonder.
I don't want or need these kinds of "standards".
It has been on life support for a long time AFAIK. I designed Visual Studio Online (the first launch of AzDO) - and every engineer, PM, and executive I worked with is either in leadership at GitHub or retired.
The “Robber Barons” name is used now for the sketch comedy group on campus: https://youtube.com/@stanfordrobberbarons
I tried llama70b too with the same task, the reasoning seemed more coherent, but it still wound up coming to very invalid conclusions using that reasoning and the output was even further from correct than qwen.
This has nothing to do with the WHO.
heh, headline made me think this was related to Eric Lengyel's excellent Slug library for text layout and rendering. highly recommend for anyone in graphics https://sluglibrary.com/
why would they not?!
"Stability" has nothing to do with reliability. "Stability" is the ossification of worst practices due to corporate dysfunction. Some of the least reliable systems are also 100 percent "stable".
> not entitled to easy and cheap access to data they don't own

This is not copyright as we know it. Copyright protects against copying, not accessing data. You can still compile statistics off data you don't own. The models are like a compressed version of the originals, so compressed you can't retrieve more than a few snippets of original text. Newer model train on filtered synthetic text, which is one step removed from the protected expression in the copyrighted works. Should abstractions be protected by copyright?
Great article. We hear so much about the unicorns of the world that we sometimes forget about the countless other failed ventures. In these cases, it doesn't mean that the idea was bad, or that the founders weren't good enough. Sometimes it's just that luck wasn't on-side.
I am not commenting on any legal mechanics. Just technical details.
There is already a fairly large flow battery installed in California and flow battery prices have been plunging spectacularly, so I expect them to have serious traction soon.
But neither seem to compare favorably to Golf Peaks[1]. Instead of rolling dice you're given a hand of cards to play, making it into a puzzle!

[1]: https://afterburn.itch.io/golf-peaks
If a country enters and leaves accords and organizations on a whim, at what point does it become a liability to have that country be at the table at all?
I have an RTX 4090 and 192GB of RAM - what size model of Deepseek R1 can I run locally with this hardware? Thank you!
I already mentioned that dual citizenship isn’t possible for Chinese. There is no person over 18 that holds Chinese and American citizenship, but you keep somehow ignoring that. Any Chinese can get American citizenship, get rid of Chinese citizenship, and buy a tv station in the states, the process is straightforward, and they won’t deny you because your ethnicity is Han or Hui or whatever.
We've seen this kind of system before. It was called sharecropping, and it was terrible.

The price will be ratcheted up, such that the majority of the economic surplus will go to the owner of AGI - with pricing tiered to the query you're asking it. The more economic utility the user will derive from making the query, the more the AGI's owner will charge them.
It’s not obvious to me that “jurisdiction” could only mean “law enforcement jurisdiction” in 1868.

Wong Kim Ark cited Schooner Exchange, which explained that nations have absolute jurisdiction over persons on their territory. It framed the cases you’re talking about, those having diplomatic immunity, as being a waiver of jurisdiction that was customary under international law.
In contrast https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bath_curse_tablets are more like votive offerings made to the gods, at a hot spring.
I like that you can hear the club swing and contact on higher rolls, but I NEED to hear the ball hit the bottom of the cup when I sink the putt.

Also, maybe some optional crowd noise if you hit it past the hole or hit it in the wrong direction due to an over-roll.
> Moves like Mark’s, and essays like pg’s, create the permission structure for people to discriminate against me.

This is key. Many people might say, "come on, Mark's just doing the usual sucking up to the new President" or "Paul's just expressing his views and trying to bring things back into balance.", just like they defend Trump's famous denigration of a disabled person on the campaign trail -- he was just joking, playing to the crowd.

Words are real things, and when spoken by people in positions of great power, they can enable abhorrent behavior which the original speaker might never engage in (well, maybe Trump) but others will.
That's a lot of words compared to "Download binary from server. Run it"
The president is obviously immune for official acts! You think Georgia should now be able to prosecute Biden for recklessly causing the death of Laken Riley?

It’s not the Supreme Court’s fault that Jack Smith charged Trump based in part on his instructions to his own DOJ. A smart prosecutor would’ve written an indictment based purely on conduct that was obviously unofficial acts, which the Supreme Court held was not protected.
I understand the difference. That is why I worded it as "It looks as if".
Shameless plug but I built GitGuard (https://gitguard.dev) to solve the "Pull request and required checks" problem mentioned here (and other problems).

Basically: you set GitGuard as your required check and then write a simple GitGuard workflow like this:

if anymatch(pull_files,"src/backend/.*") {
assert(checkpassed("backend-tests"))
}

Email in my bio for anyone interested.
I see what you’re saying, but it’s mini golf, so you only get one club.
Modern CI is too complex and misdirected (2021)
+1

I've use Jenkins, Travis, Circle, Cirrus, GitHub Actions, and Buildkite. Buildkite is leagues ahead of all of the others. It's the only enjoyable CI system I've used.
the tech billionaires didn't give us any of that (though you might have a case with the iPhone and SpaceX); they're just the ones who monetized it

It's like Carnegie setting up 2500 libraries but charging access to them and becoming an even greater billionaire in the process
Throughout the vast majority of geological history, CO2 has been a lagging indicator, not a leading indicator, of global temperature. CO2 was 1600ppm back in the Eocene. High CO2 was caused by the high temperature, not the other way around. Thermodynamics and heat equations and so on all worked the same way in the Eocene as they do today, and nobody was extracting fossil fuels.
You made that statement with a high level of confidence. What data do you have to support your stance?
we've seen newly government getting from shadow to the front row on the inauguration. No need to hide anymore.
> If something can be rewritten from scratch fairly quickly and ends up being much faster, it makes you wonder what we (the general “we”) might have done “wrong” with the “decades of effort” before.

I think the impact of Rust (and Go) shouldn't be underestimated here. Prior to these languages if you wanted fast runtime you were either using C or C++ with all their associated footguns, tricky build systems, and poor support for exposing and consuming libraries. Or you were using something like Java or C# which meant managing another runtime just for tools, which is especially bad for something like UV which manages runtimes - imagine if you were using a python tool to manage your Java versions and a Java tool to manage you Python versions, it would be a mess!

With both Go and Rust you have fast languages without memory safety issues that compile to a single, easily-installable binary and have a broad ecosystem of libraries available that mean that half the time you don't even need to write any difficult code and can just glue some modules together, and the other half of the time you only need to write the code you actually want to write and not all the support code for general pupose stuff like reading config files, file watching, etc.
What are they doing with all that knowledge though? How are they going to make money?
maybe it just got hijaked for a bit.
Why should you or I give the benefit of the doubt to somehow who has been explicitly flirting with white supremacy in his tweets for months?

He gave a Nazi salute. He intended it.

If anyone doubts that, try to do the exact same movement at work this week and attempt to explain to HR you were just showing your love by reaching out your hand from your heart.
> Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. The courts will decide.

This offhandedly seems to dismiss the cost of achieving legal clarity for using a book - a cost that will far eclipse the cost of the book itself.

In that light, it seems like an underweighted statement.
I am unable to fit that example in this prior description: "if I append to the source file, I can't break previously correct code above the insertion point". Can you help me by providing the "previously correct code" and the "appended code" which causes the break after being appended?
It’ll be balanced by nullification of regulatory action against Tesla.
A shell script has many extremely sharp edges like dealing with stdin, stderr, stdout, subprocesses, exit codes, environmental variables, etc.

Most programmers have never written a shell script and writing CI files is already frustrating because sometimes you have to deploy, run, fix, deploy, run, fix, which means nobody is going to stop in the middle of that and try to learn shell scripting.

Instead, they copy commands from their terminal into the file and the CI runner takes care of all the rough edges.

I ALWAYS advise writing a shell script but I know it's because I actually know how to write them. But I guess that's why some people are paid more big bux.
Considering a Cyberbeast out of all vehicles meets "US safety standards", I have to admit I don't have a lot of faith in those.

Btw it doesn't meet European Union standards and hence isn't sold there.
This paper is a good primer on how to be taken seriously while not being serious and how many people who say a person can’t be serious for doing something are often misled.
X sounds way cooler than SP, Q2 etc. This is the real reason, all else are rationalizations
A 'pause button' for light particles (2020)
Isn't this something Congress would have to pass a law on? EO's can be overturned by the next President.
On reddit recently I read that X has the ASCII decimal 88.

We live in a bizarre yet tumultuous time.
Glad to hear it’s working out for you. I’ve talked to too many UK devs who feel handcuffed when they get even 50% of the US equivalent, because it’s a pay cut to go elsewhere. But, as you say, it’s all relative.
Because they already have a factory in Thailand. So you just commented without opening and reading the article?
Apparently most censorship is layered on top you use their chat interface, and running it locally people got rather... Unfiltered results.
That's clever, we didn't think of that.
it's still ending _birthright_ citizenship; if you're born to US citizens (wherever you may be born) you get citizenship through your parents, not birthright.
I was primarily offended by the second code snippet, in which there is a variable named foundException but it is not an exception.

I didn't realize it was Sage (I didn't know that existed) but I'm not sure that actually makes a difference. Obviously it works, and that's fine, but it's still horribly ugly.
> the species is divided in two.

* reproductive egg carriers,

* reproductive sperm carriers

* and then there's all the others . . .

You do understand, I hope, that not all humans are born as {A} or {B}.
Derveni Papyrus
Most normal people never had twitter.
“I never really had a childhood”, said Walrus, blowing on his tea with a feigned sigh. “Why’s that?” asked Pelican, refilling a sugar shaker. Walrus: “I was born long in the tooth!” Pelican: [big stupid pelican laughing noise]
People running it locally got detailed answers, so it seems there might some process layered on top to filter things
The 14th Amendment is already the law. SCOTUS has previously ruled that the exception to birthright are quite narrow. This EO is all about getting the case back to SCOTUS so they can change a previous ruling.

Legal Eagle has a good rundown of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knH3v5aEe_g
Was one of these supposed to be Lightness ↑ and the other ↓?
Oh so it does make a difference now?

Well then, consider that it really is not my problem if these males are offended by the simple word "he".

Have you heard of the Stroop effect?

More to the point, I've no interest whatsoever in encouraging a man's fantasy "woman" identity, quite the opposite in fact.

Perhaps these men would consider giving women and girls the basic decency and respect of refraining from such misogynistic appropriation.

They could even pick another word to describe themselves, given that "woman" is already taken. What's so hard about using a different word?
China's Installed Renewables Achieved yet Another Record in 2024
What they will decide is that it is simultaneously not piracy because it is not read by a human and not copyright infringement because its just like a human learning by reading a book
Why the hell was this flagged too? This site seems to be ever more populated lately with pedants who flag an awful lot of perfectly reasonable content. That the admin lets nearly anyone flag any random thing they dislike is itself a ridiculous piece of nonsense subject to petty, small minded abuse.
https://github.com/man-group/ArcticDB
Z has the unfortunate association with the russian invasion of Ukraine.
> extremely disillusioned by the number of people in tech who are supporting Trump despite things like this

more egregiously, he tried to have the results of an election illegally overturned, incited the storming of the Capitol (and threats on elected officials), and today pardoned all those who did so (so obviously he was on their side; just think for a moment how that is going to embolden them)

we can argue about the merits of D vs R policies, but Trump is an affront to our democracy; shame on him and shame on all those who enable him