skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> the rest is a bit much

The Cabinet or the lame-duck pardons?

Cabinet members are close to the President and in commanding positions of authority; if they’re scared of a law they should work to change it.

Lame ducks, on the other hand, aren’t subject to the single veneer of a check on Presidential pardons: popular outrage. Limiting it in that span, when a President is unaccountable, and where we have ample history of silliness, seems warranted.

Note that I’m not proposing restricting commutations in any of those cases. (I suppose we should add a clause prohibiting the President from preëmptive commutations, too.)

> amending the constitution is virtually impossible

Not true. We’re probably closer to the end of our Constitutional stasis than at any time in our lives.

Hell, you might be able to ram something like this through today if you added a clause that nullifies past pardons per those standards.
Smells like a trap, what is this supposed to be?
Despite being pissed off with the previous comment, I don’t generally think about Trump if I can avoid it.

So I don’t know his specific policies here. I do know those of Elon Musk.
What is the point asking silly questions, may I ask?
Ah, they migrated away for winter.
Once you have one AGI, you can scale it to many AGI as long as you have the necessary compute. An AGI never needs to take breaks, can work non-stop on a problem, has access to all of the world's information simultaneously, and can interact with any system it's connected to.

To put it simply, it could outcompete humanity on every metric that matters, especially given recent advancements in robotics.
Anybody knows if "Silicon Box" is involved as well?
Would be interesting to see comparisons between this and very old historical maps, I bet some are not far off.
Grossly excessive sentences for non-victim crimes while letting rapists, murderers and corrupt politicians go free with at best a slap on the wrist, is why people are abandon your "holy religion" in droves
The vertical bar (|) is the best HTML page title separator
basically yes :)

chiplets seems the hot new thing, with an important difference - it's not just a fad: a lot of investments and production plans are moving in this direction. Expensive stuff. So IT HAS to work. Failure would be very expensive. But it's still totally possible.
>Only in public nobody seems to agree with him? How is that possible?

Societal taboos for example can create a division like this. You can see this divide between truly anonymous forums vs moderated conversations online.
You can easily omit almost everything in the comment and just keep it short: "Google Research seems to be quite based."
Another opinion on changing the testing pyramid https://antithesis.com/blog/testing_pyramid/
> You missed that the "victims" did not exist and were invented (and Ulbricht's defense could have claimed that he was aware of that, and it would only need one juror to find that credible).

But now we're playing legal tricks here. The real question would be if Ulbricht was willing to have people killed or not, regardless of what the defense can claim.

EDIT: just to be clear. Legally, I think it makes a big difference if someone decides to have someone else killed, tries to hire an hitman and that hitman turns out to be a policeman in disguise vs a policeman in disguise telling you "there are people doing something that is bad for you, should I kill them?". And it is perfectly right that the second case is crossing a line. But form a moral perspective, if someone answers "yes" in the second case, that still tells us a lot about that person, regardless of whether those people existed or not. The important thing is that those people were real in this person's mind.
I do not consider any of 8 wrong, if I want to understand each of their ideas. The time was slower at their times and painting with eraser is kind of a different genre.
From what I've read about DeepSeek and its founder, I would very much prefer them, even with China factored in. At least if these particular Four Horsemen are the only alternative.

On a tangential note, those who wish to frame this as the start of the great AI war with China (in which they regrettably may be right), should seriously consider the possibility of coming out on the losing end. China has tremendous industrial momentum, and is not nearly as incapable of leading-edge innovation as some Americans seem to think.
Do you have concrete ideas on how to improve?

And till those steps are implemented, don't you think you would enjoy it, if the next president would pardon Snowden, or your personal favorite case of unjustice?
Non-Scandinavian version of the article: https://energywatch.com/EnergyNews/Renewables/article1783034...

Anyway, that's very hopeful. Glad to hear the good news.
Certain discourse in other languages sometimes like to underline the difference between "rules" and "law" as in "we must aspire to be a state built on law, not a state built on rules." (not necessarily claiming English is such a language either)
Is this between unreliable and non-existent ?

- Log files found on Ulbricht's laptop with entries corresponding to the murder-for-hire events

- Bitcoin transaction records showing payments

- Messages between DPR and vendors/users about the situations

The court found this evidence admissible as:

- Direct evidence of the charged offenses

- Proof of Ulbricht's role as site administrator

- Evidence of Ulbricht's identity as DPR

- Demonstration of his willingness to use violence to protect the criminal enterprise

The court determined that while prejudicial, the probative value of this evidence outweighed any unfair prejudice, particularly since the government would stipulate no murders actually occurred.

The above is summarized from https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-ulbricht-10
It is not.

Link to previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14958989

> https://golang.org/doc/faq#What_is_the_purpose_of_the_projec...: "By its design, Go proposes an approach for the construction of system software on multicore machines."

> That page points to https://talks.golang.org/2012/splash.article for "A much more expansive answer to this question". That article states:

> "Go is a programming language designed by Google to help solve Google's problems [...] More than most general-purpose programming languages, Go was designed to address a set of software engineering issues that we had been exposed to in the construction of large server software."
Latest AMD miniPCs APUs have DDR5 memory (up to 96GB). Don't know about the channels.

But this APU hack might work:

https://blog.machinezoo.com/Running_Ollama_on_AMD_iGPU
https://github.com/ollama/ollama/pull/6282

Linux since 6.1 made some changes to allocate the memory to the GPU from userspace, but it seems the GTT method has degrated performance even more.
That sentiment calls for reflection - whoever ends up on top of the heap after the AI craze settles down is going to be someone that everyone objects to. Elon Musk was himself an internet darling up until he became wealthy and entrenched.

That said, this does look like dreadful policy at the first headline. There is a lot of money going in to AI, adding more money from the US taxpayer is gratuitous. Although in the spirit of mixing praise and condemnation, if this is the worst policy out of Trump Admin II then it'll be the best US administration seen in my lifetime. Generally the low points are much lower.
They weren't the first to meaningfully commercialise either, though. That remains with OpenAI for both (GPT-3/ChatGPT and DALL-E 2).
I started out using React in "islands" almost 10 years ago. The server rendered page would have React components attached to the interactive parts of the page. Fascinating that we're coming full circle to that. Hopefully with better state management and interoperability.
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/chinas-solar-wind-po...
Me too. 12 years seems like enough, especially considering the sentence lengths other people get. If he tries again, they can catch him again. But running an illegal marketplace with clearly allowing whatever goes, and not receiving any punishment for it? That is wild.
I think this is a good highlight of why context and reality checks are incredibly important when doing work like this. At first glance, it might look like 55% is a really good result, but in the previous year, a flat buy every day strategy would've been right 56.7% of the time.
> Trump saw parallels between the attack on Ross and the politically motivated law fare the democrats attacked him with.

How exactly was it politically motivated law fare?
1. Use a string

2. Get a second globe
There's a terrifying amount of food insecurity and poverty in Russia
- https://www.globalhungerindex.org/russia.html
- https://databankfiles.worldbank.org/public/ddpext_download/p...
Open Heart Protocol
In addition, I read stuff like "it's important to validate your data on the frontend AND server.

It's like we are learning all of this again now.
Then why the distinction with alcohol though?
It was not entrapment. There is mention of undercover purchases and a controlled delivery by law enforcement, but these are not entrapment. Most of the evidence came from his own laptop.
Quite an interesting fact that both committed victimless crimes and both were victims of exceptional prosecution
Should the damage become a problem, they'd likely do it, but not until the damage proves more costly than the cost of preventing it.
*would
It seems like a standard practice on HN nowadays. I am afraid some mods may be politically charged. See the following thread for example https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42716926
S Korea to remove concrete walls near runways after deadly crash
> It isn’t hard to tell if fresh food is safe.

You can tell if fresh salad has E. coli by the look of it? Or if fresh eggs contain Salmonella?
TIL!

> In the 1920s, moonshine runners during the Prohibition era would often have to outrun the authorities. To do so, they had to upgrade their vehicles—while leaving them looking ordinary, so as not to attract attention. Eventually, runners started getting together with fellow runners and making runs together. They would challenge one another and eventually progressed to organized events in the early 1930s.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_car_racing
Yeah this seems like an insane assumption on a language basis. Ruby has no static types (or not very good ones as far as I know) and is very hard to follow due to using "magic" so much.

I've contributed several features to VSCode (Typescript) and it was relatively easy. I have completely failed to do the same with Gitlab (Ruby) because the code is so hard to navigate. I did manage to add some features to gitlab-runner but that is written in Go, which again is much easier to follow than Ruby.

I think they are really talking about client-side vs server-side rendering. Server-side is much simpler.
No, the only project I've worked on that was a massive failure was built with Java JSF.
Transcribe and Summarize 10min YouTube in 10s by OpenAI-Whisper (MBA-M2)
Well, we've come a long way. Look at nanite - it might actually be compatible...
'Natural deterioration' behind latest Taiwan undersea cable issue
Sure I am not a power user. I doubt most people are :) I never found a CSV and instantly thought "oh wow let's put that in excel" I usually would just write a random script to get the data I want the way I want it.

Edit:// I am not sure if increased sales means anything when they switched their license model so often and aggressive
I don't know React very well but I used Angular in a large project and it was completely baffling to me how overly complex it was. In certain areas of the application it felt like it was completely unpredictable what value the state was going to be.

I sometimes long for the simplicity of something like Windows Forms.
Somewhat Analogous to tokenization?
The Fundamental Flexibility of Abstract Words
Okay? This seems like a fluff blog post as the trophy concept was coined back in 2018 if I am correct. Coming from wiremock it makes sense given their product, but it is just marketing fluff.

Honestly, as long as the GUI tip remains as small as possible I am mostly fine with whatever shape it takes below there. For modern web applications with a lot of APIs it does make sense to use a trophy. For other applications without such a communication layer a more traditional pyramid does make more sense.

What a lot of people often seem to completely overlook in discussions like this is that the pyramid isn't a goal in itself. It is intended as a way to think about where you place your tests. More specifically place tests where they make sense, provide most value and are least fragile.

Which is why the GUI should be avoided for any test that are testing logic, hence being the smallest section on whatever shape you come up with. Everything else highly depends on what sort of infrastructure you are dealing with, the scope of your application, etc.
Wood heating combined with "natural ventilation" should take care of any excess moisture inside
>Trump went around to a huge number of niche communities and promised to fix their core concerns in exchange for their support

Very interesting insight, thank you for sharing it. Do you happen to know other examples as well?
Google Keep, mostly. I write down words and fragments of songs - lines, rhymes, choruses - as they occur to me. When inspiration hits, I turn these into a song lyric, and then I sit down with my guitar or my keyboard and I come up with a chord progression and a melody, which I memorize through practice and repetition.

I learned this workflow from my mother, who is a singer-songwriter, and literally every songwriter in history, though most of them probably used notebooks instead of Keep, as I did until a few years ago. I've been using this workflow for does math 33 years now, since I was a teenager.

I think I've probably used rhyming dictionaries two or three times in that time. I would no more use any form of AI to write lyrics than I would build a robot to exercise for me. It would completely and totally miss the point of songwriting for me, which isn't producing "content" - it's a self-expressive art form.

If you find yourself wanting more than a pen and paper or a notes app for songwriting, I respectfully suggest - as someone who's been writing, performing and recording songs for the aforementioned 30+ years as well as growing up the child of a professional songwriter and also being myself a paid music critic and journalist for many years - you might not be understanding the assignment.

The most important tool you have as a songwriter - or any writer - is your ears. Listen to music. Listen to songwriters who are very good at it - there's this cat named Bob Dylan who's got a bit of a reputation for that, or Leonard Cohen or Joni Mitchell or Nick Cave or Paul Simon or Jason Isbell. Listen to what they do and figure out what they're doing.

And unless you're a born storyteller, you often need to have an interesting life to write interesting songs about. I suggest falling in love with lots of people and travelling and paying attention when you're doing these things, not just to how you feel but everything around you. Pay attention to people and write about them.

An example lyric:
I rang the New Year in / In a field out in the suburbs / Somewhere outside East Berlin / I watched the fireworks burn the night / And I wondered where you were / And if you were alright

See, that lyric exists because I actually spent New Year's Eve in a field outside Berlin. Go do that. Or get good at convincing people you have.

This isn't about software, but all the software on earth won't help you if you can't write a good song with a pen and paper. It's not enterprise software, it's not labor intensive, one person can do it sitting in a diner with a college ruled notebook and, indeed, many of the best songs have been written that way.

Or you can let an AI write it for you and dink around with the settings and call yourself a songwriter, but regardless of what you or the world tell you, you won't be. You'll actually be doing less work than most celebrity record producers and what comes out will be soulless product.

If that's what you want, great, I guess, but you certainly don't need anyone's help to make shite pseudoart. People are filling the world with it right now.
"Abuse of notation" is a commonly used term: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abuse_of_notation
Most companies don't need to become processors, only those who specialise in providing financial services to others.

Unless you have a very small company you already probably have an accountant or bookkeeper. In most situations, the e-invoicing is provided by your accountant as part of their comprehensive financial management solution. I pay about 120€/mo. for a solution that includes bookkeeping, electronic and traditional invoicing, electronic and traditional expenses management, salary/payroll and all tax declarations for my 1-person company. The effort saved/cost ratio is bonkers, and in the grand scheme of things the monthly fee is marginal.

There might be indeed a usecase for SMEs that don't want to buy a comprehensive financial management solution and instead want to send their e-invoices manually. It's probably a pretty niche usecase and someone could probably provide a "proxy" processor for something like 100€/year. It's still a very marginal cost for almost any imaginable going concern. And to receive any money you anyway need a bank account, which is not free for companies.

> That's my only negative point about this whole system is that money is being pulled away from freelancers and small SME's for every invoice they send.

I don't pay anything to send or receive e-invoices on top of my monthly plan. But I do pay a very small fee to my bank for each transaction they process.
It's a strange feeling, watching the AI get better at language comprehension than me.

I made a similar mistake on the original comment as you (I read it as "Ulbricht returned to the cafe, he actually sat down right in front of me while I was reading the story about his previous arrest here, and that's when I realised it was the same place"), and also thought you were saying that you think ChatGPT has a visual "imagination" inside.

(I don't know if it does or doesn't, but given the "o" in "4o" is supposed to make it multi-modal, my default assumption is that 4o can visualise things… but then, that's also my default assumption about humans, and you being aphantasic shows this is not necessarily so).
> (trying to move the critique beyond the title...)

This is kind of a theme in HN now. The top comments are completely besides the point of the article/story/etc.
Unexpected Kaczynski.
50% off Promo Code: CXMTU5NA
Arm has been enabling server/data-center class SoCs for a while now (eg Amazon Graviton et al). This is only going to pick up further (eg Apple Private Cloud Compute).

Also, there's nothing fundamentally stopping chiplet pick-up in traditional embedded domains. It's probably quite likely.
Extreme supersonic winds measured on planet outside our Solar System
Money alone might not fix stuff... but an absence of money can prevent stuff being fixed.
Is this along the lines of rewind.ai, MSCopilot, screenpipe, or something else entirely?
> it's more of a logistics challenge

and a bureaucratic one as well. in Germany, they want to trim bureaucratic necessities while (not) expecting multiple millions of climate refugees.

lot's of undocumented STUFF (undocumented have nowhere to go so they don't get vaccines, proper help when sick, injured, mentally unstable, threatened, abused) incoming which means more disease, crime, theft, money for security firms and insurance companies, which means more smuggle, more fear-mongering via media, more polarization, more hard-coding of subservience into the young, more financial fascism overall, less art, zero authenticity, and a spawn of VR worlds where the old rules apply forever.

plus more STDs and micro-pandemics due to viral mutations because people will be even more careless when partying under second-semester light-shows in metropolitan city clubs and festivals and when selling out for an "adventurous" quick potent buck and bug, which of course means more money pouring into pharma who won't be able to test their drugs thoroughly (and won't have to, not requiring platforms to fact check will transfer somewhat into the pharma industry) because the population will be more diverse in terms of their bio-chemical reactions towards ingredients in context of their "fluid" habitats chemical and psycho-social make-ups.

but it's cool, let's not solve the biggest problems before pseudo-transcending into the AGI era. will make for a really great impression, especially those who had the means, brains, skills, (past) careers, opportunity and peace of mind.
60%? is a very optimistic number, and even if granted, does nit address the horrible reliabilty problems with heat pumps, which change the economics considerably.
Heat pumps are noisy, and physicaly intrusive uggly wall lumps inside, and create a clutter outside.
Well built passive solar creates a living environment that needs no heat source, is orders of magnitude more reliable in all conditions, while bieng invisible to all but the most observant.An added benifit is that a passive solar house is also acousticaly insulated, and therefor
much nicer in a noisy, urban environment, near roads, etc.
Financialy, the costs of building a passive house
are not excessive, and once established, represent transferable value, while .... :)....insulating you from energy market fluctuations.
I would argue that this opinion has developed because the footprint of the average service has shrinked over the years.

If you're testing large, complex services that involve many different behaviours, you're still going to have a test pyramid. If you've implemented microservices, what you used to call an integration test has now become an e2e test in your new architecture. And you still don't want to have mostly that.
I'm not too sure about HTMX in particular, but my Rails app's FE is just HTML and Stimulus/Turbo. I'm not sure why you think it simply "doesn't work".

To me, it's a lot simpler. I use forms and links and render HTML templates. That's it.

I don't need to worry about building and maintaining a JSON API just to serve the front-end. I don't need to worry about distinct sets of routes and models. There's just one repo with one build pipeline and test setup. There's no need to worry about front-end state at all, since I'm just using plain-old links and forms.

I'm not claiming that there is never a use for React or its ilk, but I am genuinely finding it hard to understand how one can assert that this simple HTML-based approach is categorically worse in all circumstances.

In my context, the simple approach works. If I were working on something that had a high degree of inherent complexity on the front-end -- maybe a web-based video editor or some kind of WSIWYG productivity tool -- this approach would almost surely fall apart, but that's the point of engineering: Choosing the right tool for the job at hand.
Discord doesn't do forever URLs for attachments any more, they changed that a while back.[0]

The problem here is avatar URLs.

[0] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/discord-will-...
The truth is in a similar vein but more general - most just pick the stack they are most productive in, whatever that may be, and move on without writing a blog post.

For less frustration when reading such posts that are written, read the author as writing for themselves, reporting the pros and cons for their very particular situation, and see if there's some nuggets to be found in that context.

Don't read them as telling you those same pros and cons apply to your situation -- even if they veer into implying they may :-)