skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Basically he did it to get the vote of the right-libertarians.
He made a promise to them.

They idolize Ross for creating a drug market because they view it as freedom of speech.
For what it's worth, everything's up-to-date in Kansas City.
It is. And it's very much domain dependant. One of my projects is a CRM application, which is a SPA. Years ago, I had a similar incarnation of that projects as a "traditional" html+js model. It works much much better as an SPA on many levels. It's a complex app with a lot of UI elements. A simpler application might not benefit from being an SPA. So it all depends. I'm just allergic to that style of "X is dead to me so X must be dead to you".
TIL: Man has held his hand raised for more than 45 years
Sometimes the original js function isn't safe at all. So does the typescript definition.

For example, `Object.assign` overrides all property with same name. Sometimes you use it to construct a new object, so it is a safe usage. But what about using it to override the buildin object's property? It is definitely going to explode the whole program. However there isn't really a mechanism for typescript to differ the usage is safe or not. So in order to maintain compatibility, typescript just allow both of them.

And typescript in my opinion don't really isolate very much complexity. But it does document what the 'complexity' is. So you can offload your memory tax to it. Put it away, do something else, and resume later by looking at what definition you write before. In this way. It can make managing a big project much easier if you make proper use of it.
What is a unit?

I have never seen a formal definition. Without that we cannot have any discussion.

To some a unit is a function. To some it is a module (generally someone else's module). To some it is an entire application. To some it is the entire computer in your embedded device. To some it is the entire device... Most people have no clue what we are talking about and don't car (also should not care).
It truly is astonishing. We have kids who cannot afford school lunches, people working multiple blue-collar jobs and yet the problems of people who are statistically better off than average constantly jump to the front. People complain about Effective Altruism because of one dude messing up big but it would behoove everyone to read up on the basic philosophy of it before suggesting how we best spent billions to help reduce suffering.
Legal, attorney.
Why does anyone care what ai thinks?
Will turn it off.
GDC 2025 State of the Game Industry
Yup, and FSD.
Robert Moses on Completing Projects
Those kind of drugs are bought by traditional street criminals. Darknet it's mostly about psychedelics and such.
> or decides not to vote for… reasons.

The main reason being a refusal to stop assisting a genocide [0]. Seems like a legit reason to me.

You might want to ask yourself - why was supporting Israel more important to Harris than winning the Presidency and defeating Trump?

0 - https://www.commondreams.org/news/harris-gaza
Last time, in 2016, SoftBank announced a $50B investment in the US...what were the results of that? Granted, SB announced an up-selled $100B investment earlier, is this not similar in "announcement"?

"""
SoftBank’s CEO Masayoshi Son has previously made large-scale investment commitments in the US off the back of Trump winning a presidential election. In 2016, Son announced a $50 billion SoftBank investment in the US, alongside a similar pledge to create 50,000 jobs in the country.

...

However, as reported by Reuters, it’s unclear if the new jobs pledged back in 2016 ever came to fruition and questions have been raised about how SoftBank, which had $29 billion in cash on its balance sheet according to its September earnings report, might fund the investment.
"""

- https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/softbank-pledges-...
The facts are: Trump now does NTF and coinschemes himself and got talked into this by his new entourage. That is what most people here complain about.

And he does this to distract from the fact that he will not stop the Ukraine war, not stop H1B etc.

Many of the same people also complain about the Biden laptop and Biden's pardons.
It certainly isn't bullshit. I take advantage of type systems every day to help me write code that works on the first try. Obviously I'm not saying all my code works on the first try, but it often does even when it's quite complex.

The main problem is that a lot of developers don't know how to use the type system well, so they write code in a way that doesn't take advantage of the type system. Or they just write bad code in general that makes life difficult despite a type system.

It doesn't solve all problems, but if you use it well it can solve a lot of problems very elegantly.
You likely have HTTPS-only mode enabled in your browser(s). amasci.com doesn't have HTTPS configured and serves a certificate for (.*)eskimo.com. If your browser automatically rewrites all HTTP links to HTTPS, it'll throw these errors.

Try manually replacing https with http. Disabling HTTPS-only mode (or HTTPS Everywhere, or whatever is causing the rewrites) might also work.
New Option to Add Your WhatsApp to Accounts Center
Interesting setup. Looks like getting to a zen state like this would have required them to migrate their backend from Rails to ts at some point. I can understand the engineering decision not to do that.
Actually in matters of law (which this definitely is), "whataboutism" is just judicial or executive precedent.

This is like crying about whataboutism when a judge cites judicial precedent to justify a sentence. Good luck with that, it might work as a "nuh-uh" in online discussions but in real life, precedent does actually matter.
Phi-4 as LLM-as-Judge rivals specialized evaluator models wo/ finetuning
How is having your biological sex on an Id card a violation of your rights? Shouldn't they be accurate as possible?

There's no laws in America about how one dresses and presents themselves as long as its not a false identity.

Anyways, weren't you just arguing that IDs shouldn't even be required for trivial inconsequential stuff like voting?
It was a big cause that many libertarians cared about. I'm sure all the crypto people who have Trump's ear have been pushing him on this. There are also rumors that some state-level libertarian leaders promised not to promote their candidate if Trump promised to free Ulbrecht.
Yes, big tech was the kid caught in the corner cleaning out the cookie jar and threw a tantrum when one parent moved the jar out of reach as punishment in effort to help the industry learn self-control. Now the other parent has come home and has not only returned the cookie jar to the kid but pledged to bring them packs of cookies by the shipping container to gorge on in exchange for favors.
Maybe this depends on the person, but I find a device with some buttons to configure it infinitely easier and less frustrating than an app.

An app to my brain screams "depends on your phone and will be outdated at some point; requires picking and unlocking your phone to use it; will have updates that change/ruin it at some point".

I just want to feel a button and press it, especially for things supposed to be used in the dark while sleeping.
Would love to hear more about the deployment for that.
I had a similar experience watching Mr. Robot. There’s a scene where it shifts to first person PoV and the voiceover says something like “am I seeing this? Is this real?” … and it was EXACTLY the PoV I had every day walking out of my office on 36th st back then.
I think time served is an appropriate sentence for what he did.

I think life with no parole was far to harsh.
The "eh?" should be directed back at your comment, how you casually omit that microtransactions and the incentives to purchase them have become a central part of modern game design. In the end, how much of an issue you rank this to be entirely depends on your weekly play hours. Maybe you just play so much as to have no issues to unlock best in class content from DLCs (most notably cars in GTAV).

Unfortunately, a quick search didn't yield anybody doing math like for the Star Wars: Battlefront (new) debacle.[1][2]

PS: The non-microtransactional design goal in multiplayer games will optimize for more play time.[3] How convenient to offer purchasable shortcuts.

[1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWarsBattlefront/comments/7c6bjm...

[2]: https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWarsBattlefront/comments/7dmvdv...

[3]: https://www.reddit.com/r/gtaonline/comments/1i2qtay/comment/...
There's a few that have tried to implement this, and I want to live in none of them.

The US will fare no better if it walks down this path, and honestly will likely fare worse for it's cultural obsession with individualism over community.
Nebius AI Studio launches text-to-image generation with 4MP resolution support
We've just launched text-to-image generation on Nebius AI Studio with some unique technical capabilities:

Resolution up to 2000×2000 (4MP)
Generation speeds from 1.8s with Flux models
OpenAI-compatible API
Flexible rate limits for production use
Simple per-image pricing (starting $0.0013/image)

The service supports Flux and SDXL models. We're focused on making enterprise-grade image generation accessible to developers, with straightforward pricing and no artificial scaling limits.
Would love to hear the community's thoughts and feedback, especially from those working on image generation at scale.
These ones are left for the next Democrat administration, current one is probably hostile to them given their political leanings.
Long time to wait to go to the bathroom. ROFL!
> You can't score a field goal if the goalposts are denied entirely.

I'm sorry, but reality doesn't owe you a win in a game you made up.

> The anti supernatural supposition is not a moving of the goalposts. It is actually the removal of goalposts.

I'm sorry, but I'm not in this business. But if you can find a person that can demonstrate a miracle you can take them to James Randi foundation, demonstrate a miracle, recieve 1 mln dollars and split it between yourselves. Maybe it's not a lot of money but providing humanity with the first actual evidence of supernatural in history is reward in itself. You can try score your goals there.

> After the prayer the arms were the same length. So no need for x-ray arguments or any concern about any single person being susceptible or gullible since this was a group of 4 individuals.

I am sorry, but you haven't spoken to 4 people, you spoke to 1 who could (and probably did) make up the other 3 as well as the event itself.

Sometimes you meet honest person that participated in the event staged by dishonest, but I don't suspect it's the case this time since the person you spoken to claims he knew the woman beforehand, unless it was just for a short period that was part of the setup.

You have to pay more attention to your input channels.

You have the same symptoms as the person I knew. Tendency to seriously underestimate propensity of people to lie, cheat and believe in lies. It's as if you can't imagine why a person would lie or cheat you assume that what they say is accurate description of their accurate perceptions.

If you are really about truth seeking there's a ton of materials about how the faith healers do what they do. Maybe you'll see some examples of what you experienced or heard about, for example here:

https://youtu.be/vxR5-2LginE?si=ZF4mbFlfWVsDpaRZ

Please watch the whole thing and read top comments under the video. I know it's gonna be hard but please do try.
My experience with AI orchestration and LLM routing
I've encountered many AI orchestration platforms that facilitate multiple AI model integration and management. For example, nexos.ai provides access to over 200 AI models from leading providers, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta. It offers features like smart model routing, intelligent caching, and comprehensive monitoring to optimize performance and costs.

While these platforms simplify testing different models without altering code, I haven't found a strong need for a dedicated router. I tend to consolidate tasks into a single prompt, selecting a model capable of handling the most complex aspects, which naturally manages the simpler parts. Therefore, I have fewer "easy" prompts, as straightforward tasks like text fix-up and routing are minimal.

My approach to "routing" involves directing inputs to specific prompts, each with its own context. Since the combined context exceeds capacity, routing becomes necessary. However, this concept differs from traditional model routing.

Another consideration is the portability of LLMs concerning tools, functions, and structured outputs. While models like Opus and Gemini Pro 1.5 have made progress, GPT has been a leader in this area. I often use these features with smaller prompts within larger algorithms to avoid the complexities of text parsing and handling exceptions from unstructured outputs.

Portability in LLMs, especially when it comes to tools, functions, and structured outputs, is a crucial aspect to evaluate as well. We see advancements with models like Gemini Pro 1.5 and Opus but still GPT stands out as a frontrunner.
While models such as Opus and Gemini Pro 1.5 have shown advancements, GPT stands out as a frontrunner. I learned to incorporate these features with more concise prompts within larger algorithms. This helps to minimize the difficulties of dealing with errors from unstructured response and text parsing.

Ultimately, as I'm not particularly sensitive to pricing in my work, I gravitate towards the latest GPT models. If I were to switch to a platform like nexos.ai, it would be for enhanced functionality rather than cost savings. I prefer making thoughtful decisions to update the default model in my code, minimizing the need for frequent adjustments.

Given the advancements in AI orchestration platforms like nexos.ai and others, how do you see the role of LLM routers evolving in balancing cost, performance, and model specialization?
This matches my intuition. Zero is synonymous with "the absence of any X".

The singular equivalent would be perhaps "non-" or "-less".

Hot take: zero is a math concept and math deals with multitudes only (even under one, you're dealing with a multitude of parts). The actual irregularity is the usage of singular noun form in a math context.
the USDS is the biggest joke to tech people in DC – just silicon valley more cosplay
The prompt, the tests, the surrounding code, and the compiler and linters form a sort of box to constrain the AI. It works best if that box is kept small.

AI capability drops sharply once the context gets too big. Iterating with an AI against an E2E means involving enough context that you're likely to run into problems with the AI's capability, but even if not it means that there's a lot more space for creativity before you get the signal that you've gone too far.

It's too easy to forget that you've omitted a crucial file from the context and instead be iterating on increasingly desperate prompts--it's the kind of mistake you want to catch and correct early, so again: as small boxes.

For these reasons, I think lots of E2Es is the wrong play, because it creates big boxes.

If I were leading a team of AI-using devs I'd be looking for ways to create higher fidelity constraints which can then form part of that box, or which interrupt the cases where we get lazy and let it be unconstrained by any requirement except that nobody has screamed about it yet.

This would be stuff like having teams communicate their needs to one another by creating ignored failing tests in the other team's repo such that they can be un-ignored once they pass. Or ensuring that the designs aren't just user focused but include the kind of things that end up getting added directly to the context without being re-interpreted by the dev (e.g. files defining interfaces, or terse behavioral descriptions). Such that devs on different teams are including the same design artifacts in the content while they build adjacent components.

It's like AI generated code is a gas that will fill the available space, so it's the boundaries that require human focus. For this reason I disagree with the article. E2Es and ITs are too slow/expensive to run often enough to be useful constraints for AI. Small tests are way better when you can get away with them.
are they the same people?
Then I wonder who you think does the most efficient innovations. Apparently it's not universities like MIT. It's not big companies with research institutes like Bell Labs. The military? Please don't say VC funded startups.
You stop abuse in this country, particularly of children, and you start having zero violent crime a decade later.
I do agree that big part of why they support Trump is for anti-regulation reasons. But, it is also a fact that Trump is one of them, a businessman, not a politician. With Trump they can now discuss more business and less policies. There is a certain dealing of business right now that seems not at all transparent. And in this, the amount of public simping is really weird to what usually happens, everybody praising Trump even before he was taking office, and even tiktok, "coming out" as whatever etc.

Oligarchs want less regulation, but they also want these beefy government contracts. They want weaker government to regulate them and stronger government to protect them and bully other countries. Way I see it, what they actually want is control of the government, and with Trump they have it (more than before).
I hope I'm not nitpicking semantics, but I believe part of the solution is in the discourse is to specify platform owners as the greedy actors here. E.g.:

>The balance of power needs to be shifted towards the workers (and clients) and away from the platform owners.
>Platform owners obfuscate their algorithms, and use that secrecy to play workers off against each other

The platforms themselves are just code and capital, while actual human beings are leveraging them to implement this awful neo-taylorism on their workers. It would be like my grandfather being mad at "the factory" for horrible working conditions, rather than the shitty owner of the factory.
Go-with-the-Flow
More people should get these “pardons” instead of the parole process based on the similar criteria on how they are pardoned.
Come on, that's such a cop out. Like even with an extremely partisan lens, it's a very very weak argument. Like yes, presidents and their family will be targets of more scrutiny (as you said, for political reasons). That's normal. What's not normal is pardoning your family to avoid said scrutiny.

Trump was also the target of "politically motivated judicial scrutiny" (and rightfully so!) So I guess he would be justified in pardoning himself and his entire family, right?
Show HN: Analyze products using AI to find ideas
She also had a screen on every wall to watch content everywhere she looked. Fahrenheit 451 was prescient even if it was reacting to the times.
Sorry, I have to confess that I have just browsed through your text. I'm sure you mean well but I believe you are litteraly paranoid when you try to explain human modern history by the evil ideas of a handfull of people. Can't you see the irony, in 2025 US, to single out "the left" as being distinguishly anti-truth and anti-scientific? That is sick.

The human brain is wonderful at seeing patterns but sometimes it sees them when there are none.

(assuming you are a real human as opposed to an AI with a funny prompt)
Obama and other presidents put forth orders and legislation that was unconstitutional and the I didn't see the left freaking out about it so maybe try again?
I built a ribbon mic from a kit a while ago, and only broke the ribbon once putting it together! https://www.bumblebeepro.com/

Of course, as soon as i tried to record my guitarist with it, he cranked his amp and broke it again. Guitarists, man...
More importantly, money, at global scale, doesn't solve scarcity issues. If there are 100 apples and 120 people making sure everyone has a lot of money doesn't magically create 20 more apples. It just raises the price of apples. Building an apple orchard creates apples. Stargate is people betting that they are building a phenomenal apple orchard. I'm not sure they will and an worried the apple orchard will poison us all but unlike me these people are putting their money where their mouth is and had thus larger inventive to figure out what they are doing.
He does block certain tags 'by accident'.
The philosophy of duck typing is very clear in that yes, you should accept a nuclear submarine in your pound.

The problems are that you won't remember to do the same exact checks everywhere and document them.
Show HN: I made a tool to learn languages from human content instead of chatbots
Hello, I am the author of The Hard Way Guide (ShowHN'ed back in 2023), a practical handbook on language learning based on Second Language Acquisition research.

My follow up project [1] is a note-taking + SRS tool that emphasizes active learning over passive consumption through the creation of personalized materials.

Naturally, I named it The Hard Way App :)

*Core functionality:*

* Upload/import content from books, web pages, podcasts, YouTube, etc.
* Highlight any text to generate flashcards with native pronunciations (no TTS), contextual examples, translations, etc.
* Trim and extract audio clips within the editor for SRS flashcards.
* Spaced repetition engine optimized for language acquisition patterns and sustainable backlog size.
* Offline-first with SQLite storage; materials stay exclusively on your device.

The app handles the mechanical aspects (content augmentation, audio manipulation, scheduling, etc.), but leaves the cognitive work to you.

There is minimal AI, most notably DeepL + OpenAI 4o-mini for translations; mined data comes from various sources.

I don't have a demo per se, but the tutorial has a couple of quick videos [2], [3] showing the most relevant features.

If active learning resonates with you, I'd love for you to give The Hard Way App a try and let me know what do you think.

It is currently in Beta, so apologies in advance for any rough edges!

[1] https://thehardway.app

[2] https://thehardway.app/tutorial/#flashcard-gen-demo

[3] https://thehardway.app/tutorial#audio-trimming-demo
I can see what you're trying to say, but I cannot for the life of me figure out how an AGI would have helped Alexander the Great.
Making a distinction of whether individuals have changed perspective on the topic, and whether a community has are different levels of examination, and both may provide insights. In this case, Hacker news is an emergent phenomenon of individuals; it's OK to examine its evolution as whole.
AMD's hardware might be compelling if it had good software support, but it doesn't. CUDA regularly breaks when I try to use Tensorflow on NVIDIA hardware already. Running a poorly-implemented clone of CUDA where even getting Pytorch running is a small miracle is going to be a hard sell.

All AMD had to do was support open standards. They could have added OpenCL/SYCL/Vulkan Compute backends to Tensorflow and Pytorch and covered 80% of ML use cases. Instead of differentiating themselves with actual working software, they decided to become an inferior copy of NVIDIA.

I recently switched from Tensorflow to Tinygrad for personal projects and haven't looked back. The performance is similar to Tensorflow with JIT [0]. The difference is that instead of spending 5 hours fixing things when NVIDIA's proprietary kernel modules update or I need a new box, it actually Just Works when I do "pip install tinygrad".

0: https://cprimozic.net/notes/posts/machine-learning-benchmark...
And the official Python API (https://docs.vtk.org/en/latest/api/python.html) which is closer to the C++ version, and may be better for learning if you have the desire to move to that C++ version later.

Anyway, don't forget to use uv (https://docs.astral.sh/uv/) because it's nice. Have fun.
And how does this work if you have multiple (single table SIC) databases on a microservices architecture?