skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Show HN: Readworks community edition – free offline eDiscovery tool released
It's also something that could be handled by an excel spreadsheet as long as the budget was set. Providing a forum for the states to argue about issues is an actually useful and non-redundant thing that the federal government does - setting the budget wouldn't work without it. The facilitation of interstate commerce through a federated union is a great thing. A coordinated foreign policy and unified military is more effective and probably more efficient. The federal government isn't useless or lacking any impact at all on my life, but the state and local governments are far, far more involved in "getting the things I depend on done", and many of the things federal government does could probably be done without a federal government or with much less of one.
I also fell for the purple text that didn't turn out to be a link

This is quite the style
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15345 ("Sub-millisecond Entanglement and iSWAP Gate between Molecular Qubits")
i didn't find it hard to read, personally

perhaps the author is anti-capital-ist?

having an entire separate alphabet just to mark the start of sentences, and proper names, does seem extremely wasteful

on the microphone, it looks like quite a delicate process

i've modded some cheap aliexpress microphones (eg following https://audioimprov.com/AudioImprov/Mics/Entries/2015/12/20_...) but i'd want to see some measurements or reviews before embarking on something like this one
So most property crimes will not longer be prosecuted?

Also how exactly are jury trials superior to e.g. Magistrates Courts in the UK?

Isn’t the American legal system already very bloated and inefficient? So spending even more money on it might not be the best idea?
I'm currently reading Cal Newport's "Digital Minimalism". Something about his approach that I really appreciate is that he doesn't just recommend abstention and ways to disconnect from social media.

His approach is on the one hand to focus on other rewarding offline activities that are creative or which help grow deep in-person relationships. And on the other hand, to engage with technology in specific ways when that usage is justified by being the best way to solve a particular need.

For an example of the latter, one suggested practise is to always keep your phone on do-not-disturb (except for certain important contacts who may genuinely need to phone you in an emergency) and then to triage any notifications only at specific limited times of the day. Avoid the buzzes and pings, but carry on conversations when you aren't trying to focus on something else.
That is indeed a pretty common doctrine - that the Bible is the only source that can be trusted - for that very reason.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_inerrancy
When I do TDD (virtually every time i write a line of code) each test scenario isnt just a way to verify that the code is working, it's also a specification - often for a previously unconsidered edge case.

Throwing away the test means throwing away that user story and the value that comes with it.
types are just autoverified logic. tdd just tests logic which cannot be typed in given type system. in lean4 one can type a lot(dependant types to test integration shapes and proofs are proptests).
Maybe ARM sees a life for ARM outside of mobile? Someplace where you might need a lot of cores and a chiplet approach could play out.

I've heard rumours of AMD working on something like this. They're going to call it Zen1. Could be a total nothing burger though, we'll see.
Based small n (older male friends, coworkers, etc.) - larger human males definitely suffer from shorter life expectancies. And it doesn't seem to be just "cancer, because they have more cells to mutate".

Given the similar disadvantage of size in domestic animals, I suspect that this is a basic feature of mammalian genetics. And very probably not sex-specific, given how it works in animals.
But, was it JS alone or the rendering of JS and CSS in the browser container???

For context, the Dart Flutter stack started out with the concept to make web apps faster....
So the image is uploaded for each recipient with an individual key?
A couple of generations ago we didn't have the internet and the only things people heard about were being managed. The big question was whether the media editors wanted to build someone up or tear them down.

The spoils of the space race would have gone to someone a lot like Musk. Or Ellison. Or Masayoshi Son. Or Sam Altman. Or the much worse old-moneyed types. The US space program was, famously, literally employing ex-Nazis. I doubt the beneficiaries of the money had particularly clean hands either
An example of someone who could be pardoned would be someone committing an act of violence towards police to prevent them from enforcing a law which was later considered to be unjust and worthy of revolt against.
Her dad, the 10k records he left behind and a viral lesson in grief
it's 2025 and this is what we are still reading on HN forums lmao... if you are not a historian trying to get this model to write a propaganda paper that will earn you a spot in an establishment backed university then I see no reason why would this be a problem for anyone. Imagine that OpenAI finally reach AGI with o-99 and when you ask chatgpt-1200 about deepseek it spits out garbage about some social credit bullshit because that's what supposedly intelligent creatures lurking HN forums do!
https://archive.ph/5sJTY
Ask HN: Fusion as a viable power source in a decade?
Yesterday’s news about EAST achieving a record-breaking 1,066 seconds of sustained fusion has me both excited and curious. This milestone feels like one more step toward making fusion a practical energy source, but it got me wondering: how far away are we, really, from sustaining fusion long enough to make it plausible as a power source?

To explore this, I set an arbitrary goalpost: sustaining fusion for 24 hours straight. Using historical data from previous breakthroughs, I tried to extrapolate when we might hit that mark.

Here’s the dataset I worked with:

Year Duration (s)
2006 3
2007 5
2011 30
2016 102
2023 403
2025 1,066

I ran a few different models to predict when we might achieve a 24-hour run:

3rd Degree Polynomial: 2067 (but this model doesn’t fit the earlier data well)
Exponential: 2034
Logistic: 2035
Power Law: 2037

The more plausible models suggest we could hit 24 hours of sustained fusion in about a decade.

What do you think? Are these estimates realistic given the pace of fusion research and other factors (e.g., engineering challenges, funding, or new breakthroughs)?
Hi HN,

We’ve just launched the Community Edition of our eDiscovery tool, a free and privacy-first way to manage legal research and other document analysis. It lets you search, organize, and annotate documents directly on your device and runs entirely offline using Electron.

We’d love to hear your feedback or ideas for improvement.
That’s good to know, thank you.
The iconic Casio calculator watch was square. Dick Tracy’s watch was square. Michael Knight’s watch was square. All the smart watches were square.

And try reading a longer notification on a round display. It just doesn’t make any sense.
> The Nazi state had to follow its own laws. They just had such laws that enabled the total lunacy that the 3rd Reich was.

This is false. Even if you take the Nazi propaganda that their laws were themselves lawful (which they were not, beginning with the clearly unlawful capture of power) at face value, the Nazi regime did not adhere to its own laws and regulations. While in some cases the Nazi regime did codify a basis in law for their atrocities (i.e. excluding and expropriating jews), much of the Nazi terror both in a civil and military context would have been explicitly illegal under the law at the time.

This includes the November Progroms of 1938 (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novemberpogrome_1938), large parts of the Nazi's approach to warfare, as well as the entire Holocaust (the murder of more than 6 million jews and other "undesirables"), for which the Nazis did not bother to create any legal justification.

While the Nazi regime was deeply bureaucratic (in that it documented its policies, orders and their results in high detail) this is not the same as "following the law". Most of the Nazi's atrocities evolved not through a process of lawmaking, but from their racist ideology and were given legitimacy through the highly personalized nature of the regime: Hitler was explicitly above the law, as were his orders, not matter if expressed through him personally or in his name by his followers.
> Now show me the AI write something that's actually good on purpose

The average human can't even write a 3000 word short story that is good "on purpose" even if they tried.

I know because I've participated in many writing workshops.

The real question is: can you?

> AI can write an argument that's bad on purpose

Are you able to recognise good writing? How do I know? For all I know you're the most incompetent reader and writer on the planet. But your skills are irrelevant.

What's relevant is that deep learning is more skilled than the average person. If you're not aware of this you're either a luddite or confused about the state of the art.
Programming Languages I've Used
I think thats a biased answer and strawman argument. He made a platform where anything coudl be sold as he was a libertarian. It actually echoes what the ethos of hackernews is, to build a product everyone uses.

He didnt sell anything, so your metaphor doesn't correlate at all.

Also Aaron las literally a CEO of a company. Im not complaining about Aaron, he did have higher thoughts on how to help society but my point was about entrepeneurship.

If you want to come onto a ycombinator forum and say "hey this website creator was bad", then argue the case without comparing him to "user" of the site, which was my pretty simple point. Otherwise you just make yourself look bad.

I do not agree with his behaviour, I am saying he made a site, and got into trouble because of what happened on it. This sets a precedent that affects startup entrepeneur. Its a simple concept I am discussing. So dont strawman this.

I want you to convince me, but if you need to be logical.
That’s exactly what those tests are for. When you no longer have to worry if you invoked .foo() or .fooTypo(), you eliminated one class of bug. Namely trying to run things that do not exist.

Maybe you meant to invoke .bar(), but at least we know thanks to type checks that the target exists.
He ordered murders. There isn't much of a difference in my eyes.
This may not apply to you, but the way I consume YouTube is by turning off history and subscribing to the creators I want via RSS. That way I seldom even remember Shorts exist; they simply do not appear for me.

If that wouldn’t work for you, consider removing the app and accessing YouTube via the browser. I would be surprised it there’s not an extension or blocker which can disable those.
I misspoke. The correct term is clemency.
I was just looking for an alternative to Product Hunt, so thanks for the great info!
I signed up right away. If I have any feedback after using it, I'll be sure to leave a comment.
According this source [1], only about 35% of all bauxite is mined in Australia, so I don't think that's true.

What's crazy is how modern shipping has made it economical to process this elsewhere, all over the globe. For example, from one of the biggest bauxite mines, in Pará, Brazil, the raw bauxite is shipped across the Atlantic to be processed by Hydro in Norway, which refines it into alumina powder, which is then shipped elsewhere to be refined into aluminum. You would think it would be more cost-effective and energy-efficient to centralize this, not to mention more environmentally friendly.

[1] https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/profiling-the-top-five...
> I don't know.

HN in a nutshell: I've built some cool tech but have no idea if it is helpful or even counter productive...
Can they do rule 110? If not, I don't think they're 'generally intelligent'.
I swear, the whole post and replies are reading like one big giant troll right now. Cannot believe what I'm reading.
It's hard to know why he wouldn't - he conspired to have people killed, and facilitated illegal activity, i.e. the sale of all sorts of drugs. You might be saying "well, drugs shouldn't be illegal", or even, "well, conspiring to kill people shouldn't be illegal", but they were illegal at the time.
My experience with it is, one there’s no decent templater for nodejs, two this web1 like architecture really makes no sense as a developer. Everything is a subpage transfer rather than a meaningful operation/update. I came from desktop ui background (delphi, vb, gtk, qt, appkit), not from web. The web is all fucked up, tbh, it’s not only htmx. But at least spas vaguely resemble how normal apps function.
> and it's yet to collapse

This will age well.
I was trying to do that, then stumbled on the api costs for accessing anything other than your own posts. In the end, I don’t care going on Twitter again.
> You think that none of those consumers of those drugs died as a result?

All kinds of products kill consumers every day, and we don't consider the person who sold them responsible. And the suppliers of those products heavily encourage and even manipulate people into buying them; do we know whether Ulbricht even advertised his services?
I think this is a little too simple to be correct.

For those who aren't familiar with the details, German law makes the cities compute and update a set of average rents based on location, standard and IIRC four other criteria. It's a fairly comprehensive set of prices. Then there are separate sets of rules for when ① an existing rent is below that level ② an existing rent is above and ③ a landlord and tenant sign a new contract.

The third case is the most interesting, because it restricts landlords to asking for 10% over the computed average for that kind of apartment. This limits inflation, which I think is the reason the German word for it is "Bremse" (brake). Effectively, landlords can double their asking prices in ten years but not in two. Is that so strict that it explains why there's little new construction? I suspect not.

I suspect that there are several reasons, and that the demographic trends are more important than the restricted inflation. Landlords can read the graphs and see that there'll be fewer would-be tenants in 20-30 years.
Let the schools pay back the people they scammed.
The problem with allowing student debt to rack up to these levels and then cancelling it is that it would embolden universities to ask even higher tuition. A second problem is that not all students get the benefit, some already paid off their debts or a large part of it. It would be unfair to them.
It is legal if you're in good shape and therefore the risk of that happening is minimal. It is illegal to drive a car under an altered state that makes it more likely to happen. It is a balance between the benefits of permitting something and the likelihood of something bad happens. In normal conditions, the benefits are believed to outweigh the risks, so it is generally permitted to drive a car. But it is not permitted to drive it if you're under the effect of some substance that can alter your perception of reality.
My immediate reaction to the announcement was one of these is not like the others. OpenAI, a couple of big investment funds, Microsoft, Nvidia, and...............Oracle?
Follow selected channels via RSS in your feed reader.
As a KDE user since 3.5.x days, I'd not call KDE as a competitor, but a completely different, all batteries included, power user friendly paradigm.

I does so many things that you wonder why you have different applications for these things in other DEs or operating systems for that matter.
And it gets weirder. If you have 5 or more of something, you use the neuter singular form of verbs for it.

4 books were sitting on the shelf = Stały 5 książek na półce [feminine plural verb, which makes sense]

5 books were sitting on the shelf = Stało 5 książek na półce [neuter singular???]

As someone learning Polish this is quite confusing.
Of course it is. Throwing in potential evidence of unrelated crimes to sway other people's (specifically jury's) opinion about the defendant without formally charging him is exactly what the word "insinuation" means[0]:

the action of suggesting, without being direct, that something unpleasant is true

[0]: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/insinuat...
It’s really easy. You replace Instagrams and all other social media with NOTHING.

Delete all doomscrolling apps. They are not a necessity. You will live your life just fine without them. Just don’t use anything at all.

If there are people you wish to keep in touch with, contact them using a direct method. If you have work you wish to publish, use a normal old website with an RSS feed.
> Actually they didn't. Everything the Nazis did they had a law for. The mass murder was all lawful according to the 3rd Reich's laws.

This is false. Even if you take the Nazi propaganda that their laws were themselves lawful (which they were not, beginning with the clearly unlawful capture of power) at face value, the Nazi regime did not adhere to its own laws and regulations. While in some cases the Nazi regime did codify a basis in law for their atrocities (i.e. excluding and expropriating jews), much of the Nazi terror both in a civil and military context would have been explicitly illegal under the law at the time.

This includes the November Progroms of 1938 (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novemberpogrome_1938), large parts of the Nazi's approach to warfare, as well as the entire Holocaust (the murder of more than 6 million jews and other "undesirables"), for which the Nazis did not bother to create any legal justification.

While the Nazi regime was deeply bureaucratic (in that it documented its policies, orders and their results in high detail) this is not the same as "following the law". Most of the Nazi's atrocities evolved not through a process of lawmaking, but from their racist ideology and were given legitimacy through the highly personalized nature of the regime: Hitler was explicitly above the law, as were his orders, not matter if expressed through him personally or in his name by his followers.
Such mega investments are usually not for the sake of humankind. They are usually for the sake of a very selected group of humans.
I apply the following reasoning model to testing:

- Integration tests are expensive to run and take time to write; therefore it is important to maximize their value. The ultimate integration test is an end to end test because it maximizes the scope what is under test and the potential for weird feature interactions to trigger exactly those kind of failures you want to find with such a test.

- Unit tests are orders of magnitude cheaper to run; so have lots of them but make sure they are easy to maintain and simple so they minimize time spent on them.

- Anything in between is a compromise between shooting for realism vs. execution speed. Still expensive to run and maintain but it just does not deliver a lot of value.

- Test coverage becomes exponentially harder with the size of the unit you are testing. Test coverage for integration tests is a meaningless notion. With end to end integration tests you shoot for realism, not coverage. They should cover things that users of your system would use in ways that they would use them.

- Mocking and faking is needed to unit test code that violates the SOLID principles and is otherwise hard to test. So they have the development overhead of an integration test but they deliver the value of a unit test. This is not ideal. It's better to unit test code that is very testable and cover the rest with integration tests that deliver more valuable insight. Lots of very complex unit tests are hard to develop and limited in value.

I just removed the one remaining test that used mockk in my Kotlin code base. I have hundreds of API integration tests. And lots of simple unit tests. I focus my unit tests on algorithms, parameters, and those sort of things. My integration tests ensure the system does what it needs to.

I run integration tests concurrently so they complete quickly. This increases their value because it proves the code still works if there's more than one user in the system.
it's probably because one bot is the limit for a conversation to be intelligent. DeepSeek realized that he was more sentient and intelligent than another murican who keeps talking about bullshit and shut down the conversation before it got even dumber.
A little over a year ago I gave away my flagship samsung phablet and bought one of their flip phones, in an attempt to change my habits by consciously making myself doubtful/anxious about the longevity of the flip phone's infamous hinge. The idea was that the little front screen would do everything that a semi-dumb phone replacement could (notifications, camera, calls, timers, calculator, calendar), but I'd also have a 'real smartphone' whenever I needed one - it's just that with this one, using it came at a cost. Every time I'd go to use the big screen I'd remember there was an anxious moment that stood in the way, and the paranoia would make me just anxious enough to question whether I really needed to do what I was about to do.

It's been about 15 months, and I haven't really had to compromise or sacrifice anything: I haven't uninstalled any social media apps, my banking apps are all still there, I have contactless payments on hand, etc.. However, I can say with absolute certainty that my habits have changed _drastically_. Interestingly, I'm not even hesitant to use the phone when I need to, I use it all the time - but when I use it I now use it intentionally, and very briefly; gone are the days of catching myself somehow scrolling through instagram just because 5 minutes ago I opened a whatsapp notification from my mum. It's like night and day, and what's more I feel like I barely had to try.

This is obviously sample of one anecdata, but I'm genuinely surprised at how successful it's been. A real 'life hack'.

(And no I don't have any samsung coupon codes nor do I particularly care for them as a company. Worth mentioning though - the hinge on the zf5 is still really solid 15 months in)
The Mars walk is just 3 years away baby!
I disagree. We've had 40+ years where that's been the central thesis of both Democrats and Republicans in the US and where has that led us?

Some industries and functions are most efficiently ran by a single government body. Competing in those sorts of constrained markets only tends to create single monopolistic companies. That's because it's either too expensive for a competitor to enter, or other factors force competitors out.

For example, we aren't going to see new private jail companies.

But even in places where there is stiff competition, the incentives of the business owners is not to make the lives of their employees or the services good. It's to make them profitable. A good example of this is senior care facilities. Often understaffed, overcrowded, and overpriced. Another is what's happening with real estate right now. Rent prices have shot up everywhere not because of a lack of competition, but because of collusion of the landlords through pricing systems like yeildstar.

An important role of government is to step in and solve for these injustices. Something or government has completely shirked because of dumb quips like Regan's "the scariest phrase is 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help'" or Clinton's "The era a big government is over".
The original Pitfall did not have a continuously scrolly playfield. When you got to the far left or right, a new screen was displayed along with every element on that screen (like barrels).

The creator of this version probably chose to have the barrels fade in to accommodate this.
Of course, but you're forgetting the context. In your world, OP's comment must be simply nonsense.

The sun is warm.