skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Why can't you discuss sincerely and directly to the point? Why do you start with: "it's a waste of time", "this is telling", "the ExP3rtz said this.."

Stop moving the goal posts - I asked for direct examples, you say why didn't he supported parties in France and Spain.

NAZI Germany had total control over the economy. If you are contesting this point, there is nothing for me to discuss further with you.

They also had total control over the social aspects and any kind of even slight criticism of anything related to their party or the way they rule, was met with
severe penalties. They regularly executed people for treason cause of criticism.

They fully controlled all media and speech without exceptions. Goes without saying that they disarmed anyone that wasn't directly controlled by their party.
This is what the communists did, too. This is why I maintain they are the same evil.

It's unbelievable to read that a grown person thinks that companies in NAZI Germany had any kind of freedom themselves. I disagree with that strongly, as anyone knowing anything remotely about Germany 1933-1945 would.

I am against any censorship of ideas - ideas should be discussed openly. And I am against government interference in private businesses. That is core position of freedom. If Elon or Trump endanger it, I am against that, loud and clear.

This is off topic, but are you going to say the same for what the Democrats did to Zuckerberg? Check the Joe Rogan interview for details. That's just one example, they did much more than this. It doesn't matter how they justify it ("compassion", "empathy", "we protect you from thoughts" etc.)
Yeah, I've had a couple of odd looks from other people in the supermarket when my daughter's piped up about not being allowed to touch the shopping receipts, haha.

I do get the impression companies are beginning to move back to traditional printed receipts, at least a bit, here in the UK.
My Garmin Forerunner 265 has pretty decent battery life, maybe 8 days. I think what was the value for many was how their Connect app processed and displayed stats, though a recent change to "be pretty" has undone much of the usefulness.

Combined with the chest monitor I could get balance, impact, stride etc stats live on my watch, which was great for helping correct a leftward lean I didn't know I was doing. So there are definitely some great features for runners. I hate carrying a phone, my watch does have GarminPay and music.
I still use an Edge 130 because its lack of graphics abilities constrains the UI to something reasonable. All I want it to do is throw the time/speed/distance/pulse in my face. In fact if Garmin made an Edge-like product that was only a head unit for a smart watch, didn't have its own gps radios, that would be ideal for me.
I think you're right at the edge of explaining why this "laziness" is a good thing. Everything that we have made is built on what we had before, and abstracts away what we had before. 99% of us don't remember how to make even the simplest Assembly program, and yet we unleash billions of instructions per second on the world.

Even outside of math and computers, when was the last time you primed a well pump or filled an oil lamp? All of these tasks have been abstracted away, freeing us to focus on ever-more-specialized pursuits. Those that are useful will too be abstracted away, and for the better.
> When will PG fall in line?

This post is already flagged
Sorry, this should definitely work. Try clicking on your avatar -> Manage Accounts -> Security -> Delete Account. Will look into this.
Yup, I discovered this 14 years ago and wrote a proposal to do barcode scanning to help, but left academia soon after.
Law enforcement could probably just ask cloudflare for the exact IP address that retrieved the attachment.
How are the references sorted?
It's why you don't really see any beer below like 90-100 Calories, despite all the "low calorie" beer marketing there is out there.
Whatever this link was, all it does now is download a randomly named 0 byte file in Firefox.
I don’t think the idea of starting a business in tech these days commonly exists independently of the modern tech conception of “doing a startup.” And with the hiring part, the idea was that you’d do the work yourselves and only hire anyone at all when you couldn’t do the work anymore, or you got a big enough contract/sale/etc that you could pay them. The fact that the exit strategy/investment/initial expensive hiring messiness exists is the symptom, not the cause. What I don’t really get is the cause, and I suspect it’s cultural rather than logistical. Not doing something unless you can ramp it fast enough to start worrying about paying anyone other than the people that decided to do it is a deliberate choice. In a restaurant, it’s not. You literally can’t do it without the initial investment. My dad was a mechanical engineer in a startup making industrial paper handling equipment in the 90s— one of the first hires after the handful of founders worked themselves to design and fabricate the first machines securing them the contracts to afford more employees.
Agree. Just an inflammatory observation that we are prone to both villainize and glorify the institutions that be without much cognitive dissonance. :)

On second thought, "irrationally preferred during hiring" gets at that idea better.
> The good news is that Facebook, X, and the Trump administration have publicly committed to, and signed executive orders to unravel that censorship complex.
My non-ultra gets at least 28 hours, and over 48 in low power mode.

I leave it in airplane mode (this leaves bluetooth on, so it doesn’t impact functionality when my phone is nearby) and disabled the always on screen.

I agree about the questionable value proposition though. A $35 Amazfit band is surprisingly competitive with it, and has much better battery life.
> Larger companies will often write you off as being "not experienced" enough which is often code for "you don't look old enough for this position".

It's not about age, it's about what you actually had to do. Company size, company age and political complexity are strongly correlated.

A successful large company engineering director spends their day mostly doing politics across the org, while a successful small company engineering director spends a lot of their day writing code, being an architect, filling in for product management.

> Unlike engineering and the startup world, big companies want you to look the part not just know the part.

Big companies want you to know how to play the long game.
Do you have proof of this? My feed is catered to how I like it, including posts that disagree with him.
this sounds like the kind of thing you shouldn't post on the internet :)
Burying the lede, J&J's ketamine nose spray.
That's on a very cold day. Depending where you are they may be more common or not. But in the UK, they're pretty uncommon. COP of ~4 is much more common.
Why Are the Dutch So Famous for Waterworks?
The sad thing is, I feel like Meta has used up so much trust that I wouldn't even entirely dismiss the possibility that this was a deliberate thing to show a reduction in certain metrics on certain topics to curry favor.

Betting odds are this is just an embarrassing bug. But maybe there's a lesson here about the value of earning a reputation of trustworthiness.
How so? They get paraded around as tokens of competence by VCs?
>But ultimately, if you miss 100 calories a day, and are in a 500 calorie deficit recorded, you are still going to lose .8 pounds a week. And if that is consistent, adjust your portions and be fine with how you record.

And the thing is, you'll need to do this anyway - because you can't be sure in advance how many calories represents a "500 calorie deficit" for you, in your specific current conditions.

I was quite underweight in my youth, but I successfully reversed these kinds of feedback techniques to gain weight, and currently maintain what seems to be a healthy level. John Walker (co-founder of Autodesk, who passed away early last year) wrote The Hacker's Diet describing the basic technique. It's still live at https://www.fourmilab.ch/hackdiet/ .
I suspect (I'm not an expert) that for subjects like nutrition, experimental psychology and so on the next big step forward isn't scientific but political: figuring out how to somehow get funders, researchers and others lined up behind a Big Science model where a very few organisations run experiments with those truly large participation numbers. There are obvious risks in switching to such a model, but if small or middling experiments simply can't answer the open questions then there may be no better alternative.
Both supplementation and dietary strictness are scary because of the consistency. A quantity that is safe every day for a week or a month is not necessary safe every day for a year, and a quantity that is safe for a year is not necessarily safe for ten years. I've known two long-term vegetarians who were diagnosed with iron deficiency anemia in their thirties. One of them passed out while cycling home from work, which I'm guessing meant that she was suffering in small ways for a long time before she realized it. But if she took a mineral supplement every day for twenty years, how might she find out if she was getting too much of something? They sell the same supplements to people who are 5' 100 lbs and 6'4" 250 lbs.
I was expecting to see a mention of Garmin acquiring Dynastream Innovations, inventor of the ultra-low power (ULP) technology ANT Wireless protocol
Well, you can also - shock horror - drive (or bike, if possible) over to the restaurant and pick up your order yourself! That's of course assuming that the restaurant has another means of placing orders than through the delivery apps (e.g. a phone number)...
I'm not sure what conclusions can be drawn when there's only 2 data points.
"just" wartime stockpiling. Sit and look at that for a while.

Perhaps I am just desensitized to it all. There have been many escalations occurring every day that the media will not cover. Everyone's red lines have been crossed so many times it's a highway at this point. Many countries in the EU have been positioning tactical nukes at their borders and building bunkers and break neck pace. Now it's just a waiting game.
It would probably be better for such learning to occur in a place that doesn't create immutable records of judgments from one's peers; i.e. Hacker News comments.
In the USA, being sued is 99% of the punishment, losing the suit does not really matter. Especially when faced with a big corp like this.

You should think about what might get you in legal trouble, whether you might prevail is not relevant to your bottom line unless you are a Fortune 500 yourself.
> But this is a hypothetical situation

Let's just say hypothetical situations tend to happen quite often here in CEE. So in the beginning of the 90s, after the fall of communism, the borders were open but old US restrictions on buying computers were still in place for a few years. What did companies do? I think you can guess, a few enterprising guys made good money by privately buying computers in the West and selling them to companies back home. It's a long time ago, but not that long.

So I don't know, what happens when a country fills up its quota, but then the quota does not apply to small orders, so you just order in smaller batches or what.. anyway at some point Nvidia says 'No GPUs for you Poland' but that's not really true for e.g. Google that's in Poland too, and also it's not true for consumers buying GPUs. It just doesn't seem to be enforceable to me.
Depends on how you set up the company. Usually most startups are done with a limited liability company which usually causes the debt to go down with the company while keeping your personal finances safe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_liability_company

> The owners of the LLC, called members, are protected from some or all liability for acts and debts of the LLC, depending on state shield laws.

But to start a company you need some cash injection, that can come from your personal finances. Now you could get a personal loan to then inject into your company, which would make you personally liable for said loan. Personal loans are easier to get than company loans (because you can't default on them as easily), but I never heard anyone do that.

Usually you are only personally liable if you commit some sort of crime like fraud.
I do a lot of deep wilderness hiking. I have two Garmin products - an InReach Mini 2 and a Fenix 6X watch. There are a couple of big benefits over the Apple/Android ecosystem. 1) Battery life. 21 days (more with the newer models). 2) No dependence on cellular/wifi data availability (though they have been doing their damnedest to require it for syncing you watch to your Connect app). I'd love to see them merge the functionality of the two devices (provide satellite messaging direct from the watch). I have zero desire for some of the other stuff they've added (music player, payments, etc.), they're just battery drains.
Apex had plenty of cheaters when I played it, if there's a cheater and they're not detecting it there's not much I can do, just 20-30 minutes wasted.

If its a server with admins I can contact them on discord and get them banned pretty quickly. As a system it worked pretty well, had some badmins but there was plenty of servers so could just join another. Though its not really compatible with the matchmaking style games we have today.
Am I correct in surmising that someone who uses aVPN on their phone, while sending Signal messages/ content, would be cloaked, provided the VPN server they pick isn't near them ?
Thank you! That's what I get for quick scrolling through the settings. I for sure thought it would have been under Privacy (for this concern), but that makes sense too.
I wonder how large of a container that world create. Sounds like a good exercise for the reader :D
Similar arguments for all texts, both technical and nontechnical?
and Qt :D
They may be less gatekeeping than others, but they don't let you get data off the device without a cloud account, at which point all your biometrics are for sale.
Go low-tech and start printing a small local newspaper.

Pay for it with ads from local businesses, and give it away for free at all those stores. Get your regional Chamber of Commerce to help set you up with connections and sales channels.
I have a Garmin Descent Mk2i which I use for scuba diving, and it's a fabulous all-purpose fitness and adventure watch. I've used to for hundreds of dives, navigation on multiple backpacking trips, cycling, and tons of other stuff. I even wear it daily, and it nicely supports notifications from my phone.

When Garmin originally launched a scuba watch, I was kind of surprised. It's a small market, and there were a lot of established "good enough" players in the space. Everyone already had a dive computer. Who would want an expensive one from Garmin when they could buy an expensive one from Shearwater? But Garmin showed up with a good product, iterated by adding their sonar based SubWave for air integration, and eventually took a lot of marketshare by including fitness and smartwatch features the competitors lacked. Now I see tons of Garmins on dive boats. People love them.
It used to be a fairly unintuitive manual process but Strava enabled auto-import with full GPS and heart rate import recently.
Ha! I hadn't heard of this before, so it caught me completely off guard.

The coffee was the one that really surprised me. Order a coffee and get a 6-8oz cup. With nothing on the menu to indicate you can get a 12-16oz. Was surprising. (Not bad, mind. Just surprising.)
In Brazil, pica is a slang for penis.
It sounds like something straight out of a William Gibson novel.
We were rejected from YC because we wouldn’t dilute to 0 some of the early people at the company

They first told us we were in, but that we would need to adjust our cap table so that only 2 founders would have equity. They gave us a phone call, we pushed back, and later they sent us a rejection email
Ah, that's true. They even have HackerOne activity from 8 years ago: https://hackerone.com/daniel/hacktivity?type=user

So either they lied about their age then in order to join social media and they're some sort of child prodigy... or they're lying now.
Personally I think it's about perseverance, but mostly with an emphasis on learning and growing. You iterate, you learn and you eventually build up a skillset that is hard to stop even if things don't go your way.

It's not for everyone though. Bar is super high, risk is high, long work weeks with little balance are the entry ticket.
I'm not sure we disagree on anything, but yes, the government has interpreted the interstate commerce clause rather broadly. Too broadly, IMO, but the same overreach gets us good things like the FDA/USDA and the FCC.

It's possible they are avoiding the marijuana fight in order to keep this broad interpretation, though. I have a pet theory that the equal rights amendment isn't in the constitution to avoid a legal fight that would also strike down the income tax, but these are all sort of just theories.
It's not unfathomable for a precocious 8yr old to register for an account, with or without parental guidance.
Right, "able to operate in territory you didn't control yesterday" is a pretty big offensive bonus for tanks relative to bunkers.
Push notification thumbnails. It's mentioned in the article ...
The rambly speech is how it "reasons". An LLM can only compute tokens based on the tokens before it. So with a more traditional chat model, it has to compute the answer straight from your question. With a model trained like this, it can lay down a lot of "trains of thought" before it needs to come up with an answer, and potentially they can make computing the final answer easier.
He didn't censor for the former president
Id say 75% of the events in my personal calendar are doctors appointments for the family which were manually entered based on the reminder card that the receptionist handed me.
At least they asked permission.
> LLMs are not designed to be truthful - they are designed to make stuff up

I like to say that they are designed to be "convincing".

> Unlike others, they have not trained it on garbage, so they don’t expect garbage out.

Debatable!
The Cognitive Footprint of Medication Use
They should just support all cards. Just like Nvidia does.

And they drop support too quickly too. The Radeon Pro VII is already out of support. It's barely 5 years since release.

This way it will never be a counterpart to CUDA.
The most interesting part of DeepSeek's R1 release isn't just the performance - it's their pure RL approach without supervised fine-tuning. This is particularly fascinating when you consider the closed vs open system dynamics in AI.

Their model crushes it on closed-system tasks (97.3% on MATH-500, 2029 Codeforces rating) where success criteria are clear. This makes sense - RL thrives when you can define concrete rewards. Clean feedback loops in domains like math and coding make it easier for the model to learn what "good" looks like.

What's counterintuitive is they achieved this without the usual supervised learning step. This hints at a potential shift in how we might train future models for well-defined domains. The MIT license is nice, but the real value is showing you can bootstrap complex reasoning through pure reinforcement.

The challenge will be extending this to open systems (creative writing, cultural analysis, etc.) where "correct" is fuzzy. You can't just throw RL at problems where the reward function itself is subjective.

This feels like a "CPU moment" for AI - just as CPUs got really good at fixed calculations before GPUs tackled parallel processing, we might see AI master
closed systems through pure RL before cracking the harder open-ended domains.

The business implications are pretty clear - if you're working in domains with clear success metrics, pure RL approaches might start eating your lunch sooner than you think. If you're in fuzzy human domains, you've probably got more runway.
The core of the argument is that if accuracy and reliability matter and if verification is hard, then LLMs are inappropriate.

If accuracy and reliability don't matter, go for it.

If they do, but you can easily verify the output, then go for it.

So, yes. The core argument would apply to making inquiries about any ancient religious texts especially if you aren't already able to read the generated text (it's in a language you aren't fluent in) or are unable to access its claimed references to verify what it says they say.
Most of the time the wage is not up for negotiation. Forget about it, you can't change it. HR and your future boss are tied up with company policy which says you start at X and you can't change that.

Spend your time instead on getting more vacation from the start. If instead you ask for 25 days of vacation per year instead of the default 10 you have a deal (or maybe they bring you down to 20 days). You can't get 50 days of vacation (there is a company max they can't go beyond), but you can get a lot more time.
Everything you said here is false
Somewhat related, I built a local llm fine tuned on some open published literature on metametaphysics via philpapers.org, and I was surprised at how well it would respond. I think that philosopher's tendency to overexplain every fine point is like the world's greatest prompt engineering (possible side gig for my underemployed philosophy bros).
You can also ping the same person multiple times, like once a day at different time of the day. That provides a more complete range.
I track everything. (with caveats below)

It's less important to get the calorie numbers perfect, and more important to be consistent in your under/over reporting. To me, it's a tool to track the consistency of my diet. No amount of over/under reporting is hiding 2 slices of pizza on a graph.

In sweet dishes, 2 TBSP sugar is 120 calories. In savory dishes, 1 TBSP oil is 100 calories. None of the other minor ingredients have any appreciable calories. You should be able to predict quantities within a 1 TBSP tolerance range. The rest of your calories come from foods with visible volume, and chatgpt does a good job of predicting their calories from screenshots. With that, hopefully, you don't under-report any meal by more than 200 calories. If you're following a recipe, dump the whole thing into chatgpt, voila.

Over 2 meals, under-reporting by 200 calories feels like a lot. But wait to have 1 milkshake, beer or 1 tiny baklava and see the graph shoot beyond any of these pesky concerns. The goal is to track and be accountable for the latter: the ultra-palatable foods. The extra onions and parsley are not making you fat.

For outside food, you can find official numbers reported by fast food places. Add 20% to their estimate. Actually, add 10% to all estimates. Every your own food. If a full meal randomly lands under 500 calories. I look at it with scrutiny. It takes careful effort to stay under 500 and feel full. If it happens consistently and you don't lose weight, then you're tracking something wrong.

PSA: NUTS HAVE A SH*T TON OF CALORIES. ALWAYS REPORT THEM. YOU WILL BE SHOCKED.
_____

The system has worked quite well for me.

In all cases, my weight gain has corresponded to long periods of door dashing, liquid calories & dessert binges. On these days, my daily calorie consumption jumps by ~800 calories. Getting your oil intake wrong by 1 TBSP makes no difference to that number. Focus on the main culprits.

____

P.S: ofc, if you care about micros, my comment is irrelevant.
> I mean, it’s not called Startup News

Well, not anymore it isn't: https://web.archive.org/web/20070601184317/http://news.ycomb...
It's not magic, it's qualified workers already familiar with the necessary standards because the standards were (somewhat) unified by the EU specifically so that labour had an easier time moving.

That does also make utilities easier, but it's not magic… well, you could say it is but only in the sense of Penn and Teller: lots of effort that most people don't ever think of that already happened before the audience started watching.