skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The best in class libraries depend on many crates. But crates are often used in workspaces to speed up compilation or split up independent parts.

So how many dependencies are there truly when you peel away the first layer of the onion?

https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/workspaces.html
This is a good way to do it, but can backfire. When my kids were very small they had "coaster" bikes, which are just bikes without pedals. They enjoyed these immensely, but they quickly outgrew the coaster and it was time to move on to a pedal bike and they hated the pedals. To be fair this was partially my fault since we bought regular fixed gear with coaster brakes style kids bikes, which feature annoyingly short crank arms and low gearing which makes it very difficult to get the bike up to high speed. The new "big kid" bikes they got were slower than the old leg powered coaster bikes and harder to use on hills. They resented pedal bikes for a long time.
> what really happened was suddenly millions of parents could directly see what their schools and teachers were like

Well, you got to see what they were really like while they were in the midst of dealing with a traumatic global pandemic in their own personal lives while also trying to deal with an essential job that looked nothing like what they had trained for while trying to support a virtual classroom full of children who were also in the middle of a traumatic global pandemic.
Yes, "political statements are violent or are calls to violence" is true in the sense that state power is ultimately based on the threat of violence. At the deepest level of analysis this violence is illegitimate too. The thing is, we are sadly not yet at the point where we can do away with the state.

The rules are reasonable as far as they prohibit glorifying illegitimate violence. Whether the platforms applies the rules in this way for other cases or not is irrelevant for this particular case, even if we know the TOS are applied pretty arbitrarily.
The Fed makes decisions for technical reasons, not political ones. That's a feature, not a bug.

I personally do not want a boom every 2 years just before the election, as congressmembers try desperately to make the economy look good, followed by a bust just after the election, as their medium-to-long-term-bad-ideas get shown to be bad.
An interesting one I read was public schools and their creation of a national identity. Before public schools there weren't really standardized languages forced upon an entire nation, etc. The countryside was more one country/people/language morphing into the next, not clean delineated lines where country/language switched instantly. It was also said borders were much more open/abstract before the resultant shift as well.
Solid but could have double-clicked on Excel and Powerpoint more to complete the roadmap.
In all those years working on and playing with free software, I still cannot understand the incessant need for badmouthing other projects and calling things "half-assed". What a destructive habit!
Not the same company, but similar: I have some old T-shirts advertising tape drives from Quantum when my dad worked for them in the 80s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Corporation

They were a tape drive and hard drive manufacturer. I guess they still have the tape drive section, but they sold their HDD division to ... Maxtor, which then got bought out by Seagate, I think?
There really are no medications on the market indicated for long term use to help with sleep.

Often doctors prescribe low dose Seroquel, but that has its own laundry lists of problems.
It's not being thrown away, it will work as normal in every other country except the United States.
the claim is circumvention of technical protection.
GARY: Hey Cindy, remember last week when we were debugging that system design issue?

CINDY: Yeah, we got some pretty elegant solutions out of that sprint.

GARY: Exactly. That got me thinking: our relationship feels like a system that’s not just functional—it’s optimized.

CINDY: Oh? I’d like to hear your use case for that.

GARY: Well, I’ve run some simulations, and the output is consistent. You’re my primary key, Cindy. The stability and scalability of our relationship are off the charts.

CINDY: That’s a strong endorsement, Gary. I’ve been analyzing our feedback loops, and I feel the same way. You’ve really reduced my latency and maximized my throughput.

GARY: So I figured it’s time to push to production. In addition to all the features we’ve developed, I’d like to add one more. (He takes a knee and pulls out a ring.) Cindy, will you marry me?

CINDY: I will, Gary! This takes our architecture to the next level.

GARY: Marriage is a big commit, but I think we’ve got the bandwidth to make it work.

CINDY: Absolutely. But we need to stay agile, especially during our onboarding phase.

GARY: Agreed. I’ll make sure to stay in sync during our sprints.

CINDY: Good. Because I have one non-negotiable: we need to maintain a clean codebase.

GARY: Let’s unpack that.

CINDY: My last relationship had too many tech debts. Every time I tried to refactor, there was pushback. It was impossible to iterate.

GARY: Sounds like a monolithic mess.

CINDY: It was. But with you, it’s different. You’re modular, efficient, and your logic is rock-solid. I just want to make sure we keep things lightweight and maintainable.

GARY: I couldn’t agree more. We’ll keep our dependencies up-to-date and document everything thoroughly.

CINDY: Perfect. Let’s set up a shared repository to start planning our roadmap.

GARY: Done. I’ll draft an RFC tonight so we can align on our deliverables.

CINDY: Great. Just flag me if you hit any blockers.

GARY: Will do. And Cindy? Thank you for being my forever stack overflow.

CINDY: And thank you for being the solution to all my edge cases.
I thought this would be about ditching the vestigial pedals on electric bikes, especially "fat bikes."
I have queries and doubts on the proposed union. See attached ticket. Please do the needful.
> The whole point of jargon is to have precise definitions

Well, not always. Per Webster:

1: the technical terminology or characteristic idiom of a special activity or group

2: obscure and often pretentious language marked by circumlocutions and long words

It would be great if it were only (1) but I’d often (2)
> Can you?

Generally the burden is on the person making the positive claim.

> I'm happy to simply continue to hold a different opinion to you.

Sure, I have no qualms taking your opinion as just speculation/belief/Ameriphobia.

> You are being dismissive of the issue though; and it's never helpful.

Strong claims require strong evidence. Without evidence it's reasonable to dismiss.
I think you are seeing through the trend that many people disagree with you.
Ask HN: What should I read/watch/code next to understand ChatGPT technicals?
Hi, I'm a CS undergrad at Berkeley. I'm relatively new and behind (vs my peers) in CS, and would like your recommendations for self-studying the technicals of ChatGPT (text and video generation), please.

Some background on me:

* I enjoy my classes because I find the academically interesting...

* But I'm generally way behind the trends and hype.

* At Berkeley, I did well in CS189 Intro to ML (Shewchuk) https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~jrs/189/

* Also did well in LinAlg, Data Structs, Algos, etc.

There's so much information out there; I'd value your recommendations what what articles/videos/projects I should do next, after CS189/Intro to ML.

Thank you in advance.
Most of my projects on my GH are me contributing to other OSS projects, or me just experimenting (there are a couple exceptions). One of them is one I've thought about posting about on here, actually, since it's in it's pre-release stage and is quite stable. I've never had my own blog for professional purposes, so talk about new territory for me... Lol
>This is literally not true. Please tell me where in the Constitution the federal government is given this authority. You won't find it, which is why all the contortions around federal authority are political in nature and not legal.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/amendment-14/sectio...

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/amendment-14/sectio...

Section 5 gives congress the power, not the state, to enforce section 3.

If you want to say you were right that it's an amendment, ok.
How to prepare for ditching your social media
> Monetary policy is policy and all policy should go thru congress

Should the Congress also make play-by-play battle calls in war? Let's dissolve the DoJ, too, and have the Congress prosecute and investigate, à la Athens.

> If congress is being useless, vote them out

Again, Argentina. Electeds always want rates lower and spending higher. (Rich people who can store their wealth offshore, even moreso.)
Things aren’t that rigid. React is just a template library (it doesn’t have any franework stuff at all). You don't have to make an SPA with it.

In 2015 we were doing

$('[data-widget="colorpicker"]').each(() => ReactDOM.render(<ColorPicker />));

Basically what HTMX is trying to do but with jQuery + React. No SPA. Just static pages with dynamic elements.
Human telephone game ... you tell your story to one person that person tells it to another and to another and so on. Then someone writes about it and her story is out. She didn't have to stand up in public per say and tell her story it gets out anyway. Her story and the mockery from it teaches other fools not to be such.

I, myself am not one to ever bully a person or an entity online. It's just not good energy to put out there.

As for my belief that not all of what we see on the Internet is real (in the media too).. i won't go down that rabbit hole. Your point is do not bully people online whether they are really real people or not.
Are international waters in the southern Indian ocean Qantas' neighborhood?
Also, eating raw salad veggies (lettuce in particular) is one of the best ways to get foodborne illnesses like E. Coli.
Even though you can clearly find theoretical damages here, I feel like this won't go anywhere.

It's not like they prevented current customers from switching, they didn't notify their current customers of something that would enrich them.
Exactly. I have never ever had an OS "cut-paste" operation work in a way that git didn't see as entirely new files that it never saw before.

If it did work like that, there would be no reason whatsoever for the "git mv" command to exist.
I don't necessarily buy the argument that we should play the same game as a communist dictatorship in the name of fairness. If we eat our own dogfood then we ought to conclude that suppression of speech in fact marks a critical weakness of their system. Why not take the free real estate, then, and leave our system's open nature unmolested?
It is my understanding from a (no-longer-available) MIT OCW aircraft systems design video that these requirements are based on one engine failure on the aircraft, regardless of the number of engines on the aircraft.
The rating is taking into consideration that it has 4 engines. The term is just confusing because it used to only apply to twin engine aircraft.
AI Written, AI Read
CryptoEconLab | Remote | Full-Time | https://cryptoeconlab.com

CryptoEconLab (CEL) is seeking a Research Scientist to architect next-generation crypto protocols. We design token economies, incentive systems, and market mechanisms from initial concept through governance and ecosystem growth.

Role: Lead protocol design and architecture, develop token economies and emission mechanisms, construct markets/auctions, run agent-based simulations, and provide research leadership.

Required:
- PhD or equivalent in CS, Statistics, Applied Math, or related field
- Track record creating/deploying crypto protocols
- Strong background in game theory & cryptoeconomics
- Practical software engineering skills
- Excellent communication abilities

Skills: DeFi, DePIN, statistics, agent-based modeling, game theory, smart contracts

Compensation: $100-140k USD + benefits

Email CV + relevant publications to hiring@cel.build with subject "Research Scientist Application"
No not really - it's quite a good interview. Here's the masculine energy bit if you want to judge for yourself. You only have to watch a couple of minutes to get an idea https://youtu.be/7k1ehaE0bdU?t=5329 To me "ranting" is not true. He calmly says he was brought up with girls and it's quite nice go get out and do martial arts for a change. To me that's normal and getting upset about 'men' not getting free tampons is kinda weird.
I wonder what you're watching to make YouTube think you want to see it.

I don't see Jordan Peterson or any of those right-wing videos in my suggestions at all.

I just went to my front page, and everything there is stuff I'm interested in. There's the latest clip from a Hell's Kitchen episode, a Gamers Nexus video, an aviation incident with ATC recordings, a video from Fully Ramblomatic (game reviewer), a video on how to to use a cable comb and why you'd want to, a LockPickingLawyer video, videos related to MS Flight Simulator, mountain biking, Factorio, Technology Connections, Adam Savage's Tested...

There is literally not a single suggested video that I wouldn't be interested in in the first 3 pages of my YouTube front page.

So when people complain that YouTube is constantly suggesting right-wing content, brainrot, and MrBeast, I don't know what the hell they're talking about.

Heck, I watch Legal Eagle, which gets pretty political, and yet I don't get basically any political content suggestions.

Are you guys not logged in or something? Constantly browsing from incognito windows?
> Profit isn't far removed from theft

I definitely think there are unethical ways to profit - capitalism needs to be regulated for the good of the consumer/ecosystem/society.

However, I don't believe that a blanket comparison of any type of profit to theft can be useful or correct.

> so maybe this shouldn't feel so unfair

Do you think this company is unethical for writing closed source software and trying to sell it?
Texas defends requiring ID for porn to SCOTUS: "We've done this forever"
Right on, thanks for the explanation!

So what gets called the "public key" in the blog post is just the (self?-)encrypted secret key from the user?

I'll read up on your other points after work -- appreciate the search ledes :)
"wah"
Can the ball roll into wormhole, emerge in the past, hit its past self and stop, while its past self it knocked to roll into the wormhole, emerge in the past, hit its past self ...
I think an important note is that regulatory agencies in other countries have cracked down on some of those scary-sounding chemicals, due to them being unnecessary for food with no real benefit for the person eating it, and possible evidence of negative affects.

I mentioned this in another comment, but as someone who has lived for multiple years in the US and Europe, it is a drastic difference in food quality between the two. Much easier to eat foods made of whole ingredients where I lived in Europe - even many prepackaged foods that we’d buy at the grocery store.

I came across this link yesterday[1] on a health-focused HN thread[2]. The study split a group of overweight people up into low-carb and low-fat diets, to see which produced better weight loss. The group that lost the most weight was actually neither - it was just whoever ended up eating less processed foods and more whole foods.

[1] https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/health/to-lose-weight-focus...

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42668123
> Character stats, names, details about players - those are inputs, and structured ones at that.

Some details about players are structured and can be easily stored and referenced. Some aren't. Consider a character who, through emergent gameplay, develops a slight bias against kobolds; who's going to pick up on that and store it in a database (and at what point)? What if a player extemporaneously gives a monologue about their grief at losing a parent? Will the entire story be stored? Will it be processed into structured chunks to be referenced later? Will the LLM just shove "lost a father" into a database?

Given current limitations I don't see how you design a system that won't forget important details, particularly across many sessions.
If social media is so bad let's regulate ALL of it, US firms included.

Personally I fear US-controlled social media more than Sino-controlled ones. It's not like the CCP can come and arrest me here in the US, or really use my data against me in any way. Both have plenty of reasons to throw propaganda at me, or censor certain viewpoints.

At least when it's a foreign country I have a chance of seeing through it, compared to so many domestic media sources currently licking Trump's feet. I'm supposed to feel secure that they'll be telling me the truth over the next 4 years? Acting in my interest?
Seems like you don't really have any issue with the underlying business decision (ie. pushing a high usage customer to a higher tier plan) and are only upset about the wording the salesperson used. All the points you've made applies to ISPs as well. Most neighborhoods are probably provisioned well enough that a single customer saturating their 1gbit connection isn't going to bring the network down to its knees, but that doesn't mean ISPs aren't justified in pushing such customers to a higher tier offering (eg. dedicated circuit).
Any guesses on how this will actually work? The apps will be definitely be removed from app stores. Will existing apps work? Will the website still work? Will the death of the app come from "creators" not getting paid? What if users continue to use tikok, but there are no longer professional creators or ads? Would a social network like that be the most radical of all?
> Yes, Puritans were relatively few in number but they were influential

They were influential in a narrow geography of the Massachusetts Bay Colony for about 50 years. Their own children and grandchildren largely rejected Puritanism resulting in the Half-Way Covenant and the eventual demise of Puritanism. I agree that they're part of the foundational myth, but it's just that myth.
Relocating for Tech Jobs in 2025
Helping software engineers to relocate during my last 12 years and working with various hiring companies (from Japan to Canada), I tried to connect the dots and share my predictions for the job relocation market in 2025.

These insights are mainly for the Tech industry. But, many of these trends will likely apply to other sectors, too.

So, let’s break it down.

1. Competition will become more intense

We’ll see a significant rise in applicants for each position. This increased competition will make it harder for job seekers to stand out and increase their workload for companies that hire talent from abroad.

2. Relocation-friendly job ads will decrease and become more segmented

Not all markets will be equally open to hiring talent from abroad. Fewer jobs will explicitly support relocation. Opportunities will be concentrated in specific industries and regions.

3. Remote work will become a pathway to relocation

Securing a remote job first might be the key to relocating. Over time, this could prompt them to offer you a relocation opportunity. You also might start with a remote contract. Later, transfer it to an Employer of Record (EOR) in your desired country. This model is popular for moving to Canada with a remote US contract.

4. "Job seeker" visas will gain more traction

Countries like Germany, Austria, Portugal or UAE are expanding job seeker visa programs. These programs will allow individuals to relocate without a job, shifting the risk from employers to job seekers, who can then search for work after moving to the country.

5. Relocation may involve extra steps or intermediary companies

Your path to your dream employer might be longer. It may involve intermediary or consulting companies that handle payroll for larger corporations. You may first work for a third-party employer, not your target company.

6. "Digital nomad" visas will make relocation more independent

These visas allow professionals to live and work remotely in another country. They offer an alternative to employer-sponsored relocation. It helps job seekers test a new location without committing to a full move.

7. Prioritizing opportunities over salary

For candidates, the value of relocation will grow. Salary and compensation will matter. But, relocation and career growth may matter more.It might lead to moderate salaries and less competitive relocation packages employers offer.

8. Europe leads as the top destination for tech talent

European countries, like the Netherlands, Germany and the UK, would be the top choice for tech talent (based on Relocate.me data for 2024). It's based on the not-so-complex immigration process, work-life balance, social benefits, etc.

That said, the 2025 job relocation market will have both challenges and opportunities.

If you're adaptable and persistent, there will be plenty of chances to grow and achieve your relocation goals.

Would you be eager to relocate for a job this year? Where and why?
Maybe they should be banned too? It doesn't subtract from my point. Still, there is a world of difference between killing people because you don't like their companies and killing combatants of a terrorist organization.
The US censorship of Chinese social media apps on these grounds sure makes it look like China was completely justified in doing it first.
And the TV show Dark
Ticket includes one (1) proposal of conjugal union. Action this.
futurama solved that: fry travelled back and became his grandfather's younger self, rather than his own younger self
We’re talking about the resultant profit gain from productivity improvement, and how GP didn’t think the worker necessarily deserved any of the share of the value returned from that increase.
This looks great! Any plan to support other languages like bicep?
I see a new product-hunt alternative launched every couple months here. Maybe I’m cynical, but I don’t think we’re going to displace product hunt with things like new voting dynamics. They already have the network effects, so I think you’d need to make a relatively large change to stand a real chance.

Edit: Here’s a proposal for a bigger change. do some free advertising for the submitted ideas. Run simple Google/youtube/facebook ads for them, just directing people to their page on your platform. Hopefully this doesn’t burn too much cash, since you’re actually advertising for their page on your platform, so it’s good for you in the end. Perhaps submissions have a small fee in the long-term, to monetize the platform.
The ironic part is that's what he's probably thinking and chasing (he talked at length recently about bringing 'masculine energy' back to Meta). He's literally one of the most powerful people in the world, but always comes across as wishy washy and unconfident.
I hadn’t either. I just saw the program years ago and it stuck with me as a great model.
One reason this Tekegram thing became popular dues to its claimed privacy and encryption