About Concord:
There is a lot of discussion about why Concord failed.
Some say that the price was too high. But at the same time, games with the same or even higher prices sold just fine.
Then there is the argument that the genre of hero shooters is just over-saturated.
This is also not true. Look at Deadlock, which (AFAIK) is still in a closed playtest phase and currently has a five-figure player count according to SteamDB.
Or Marvel Rivals, which currently has > 270,000 players online.
One "non-woke" mistake they made was the marketing. Apparently, very few people even heard about that game before it was cancelled.
Then, there is the awful character design.
No one in their right mind could call that design good. That's where that toxic positivity comes to mind.
That is probably the most criticized thing about that game.
If you research how that happened, you might find things like these: https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/1d85lr9/con...

And that's what really pisses off the average guy.
It is perfectly fine to have certain statements and to want to raise awareness of specific issues.
The main demographic for these computer games is straight white men.
So it makes sense to try to insert your views about this in a game if they are your target audience.
But that needs to be done properly and in an intelligent manner.
Just adding one white dude option into a mix of overly diverse characters, also making them visually very unappealing to not follow traditional beauty standards and then telling the average dude to "Acknowledge their privileged position" is not an intelligent way to handle this.
Here, the consequences were quite spectacular. The average gamer who plays hero shooters wants to have their escapism in games and be the great hero that they can't be in real life.
This game did not provide that.
There are also games that are openly about specific statements, and they openly communicate that.
They are also usually niche products because of that because - like I said - the average gamer wants escapism from games.

An example where that's done better is Baldur's Gate 3.
The overall game is great, but you also have all the relationship options you might like.
I learned that the hard way, when I accidentally broke my carefully created romance between my male avatar and a female party member.
I was just being friendly to another male party member, which directly started a gay romance with him.
In this case, I would have preferred an option to select the sexual preferences before that happens, but it's nothing that makes the game bad.

> Are you aware of any places where there are fixed quotas and random unqualified people are hired because of their gender or skin colour? I'd be shocked, and all "DEI HIRE" outrages I've seen have been utter nonsense spread by right-wing crisis actors (I've seen it for firefighters, Boeing, Alaska Air and a bunch of other things I can't recall) because it's fashionable to say any non-majority employee was hired only because of their immutable characteristics and is by definition unqualified. Which is, of course, nonsense.

Well, that doesn't look like you are really open to any discussion on this, since you're dismissing anything that's said about this as "nonsense" and you are calling anyone who brings up the examples you just mentioned "right-wing crisis actors" by default.
That's not how you discuss this. You bring up your position and already define any other perspective as invalid.
But maybe I am wrong, and you are actually willing to change my mind. So, what do you say about this video? It's less than 1.5 minutes and I think it is a good example.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hghBAcxEMzM