skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> despite Google's docs stating that this is a valid use. :)

I don't think Google's docs actually say this. I assume you are referring to the "hd" claim, but that only says:

"The domain associated with the Google Workspace or Cloud organization of the user. Provided only if the user belongs to a Google Cloud organization. You must check this claim when restricting access to a resource to only members of certain domains. The absence of this claim indicates that the account does not belong to a Google hosted domain."

It does not say you can use this claim to restrict access to members of a certain workspace, only for a certain domain.

I think certain service providers might have made the assumption that if a user belongs to a certain domain that also means they belong to a certain workspace, but that is clearly not a valid assumption.

I think that Google's public OAuth integration is only intended for use in situations where you want to allow logins from any Google account, regardless of workspace membership, and if you want to restrict logins to Google accounts belonging to a specific workspace, you are supposed to use one of the other integrations.

Given all that, I still do not think this is a problem with Google's OAuth implementation. Instead it is a problem with service providers who have incorrectly used the wrong type of Google SSO integration. Or in the case of service providers that offer multiple Google SSO integration options (like Slack), it is a problem with the company for selecting the wrong one.
Is there a problem with Youtube Shorts? Or Facebook videos?
How to Download Your Videos and Other Data from TikTok
https://archive.ph/2CQUr
This is the best point I’ve read about this. I don’t think TikTok should be seen as a facilitator of free speech, because it has no obligations to allow it. It’s a private enterprise with their own community guidelines censorship, but most importantly they control the ”algorithm”. No matter how much these platforms claim to be town squares, they are absolutely not and thus serve no essential speech function. If they did, content would not require installing spyware to see. (In my opinion secret mandatory engagement algorithms don’t deserve even section 230 protections).

On the other hand, it doesn’t sit right with me that ”China scary” is enough to outright block whoever is successful in the surveillance capitalist game invented in the US. It screams of political hit job for hire by the tech oligarchs. It’s like banning Taco Bell for health reasons and leaving McDonalds alone. If the modern US was not a plutocracy, this would have been an opportunity for legislators to do real harm reduction and steer predatory mega-corps in a better direction.
I fundamentally see this as a consequence of the original sin of Senate. Article I, Section 3, Clause 1 and Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 work together to make the Supreme Court a reflection of state values rather than popular values. Any time the two drift apart - due to changing popular opinion, migration, etc, the difference is reflected in political tension. There's no viable escape hatch for popular grievances against the supreme court (impeachment is non-viable again, because the Senate structure) which puts us in a precarious situation.

I don't see a viable way forward since amendments also follow a state structure given Article Five.
I don't see how people don't see what is their most likely rationale - the ban will be temporary. Trump's already come out against it and is going to work to reverse it once in office. If it can't be done directly, it'll be done like usual - as an addon to some must-pass bill.

I think they would probably refuse to sell in a situation where they had reason to expect the ban to persist (for different reasons), but in this case they probably didn't even consider selling when there's a high probability they'll be back legally operating in the US within a year.
I don't have the background to properly evaluate either the site or the rebuttal. My only feeling is that the rebuttal makes a good general point about "bullshit asymmetry" and cherry-picking statistics.

Why is the rebuttal 'naive' but the site not?
ACLU has dropped in quality significantly in the past 10 years IMO and this seems par for course for them since 2016.
Gap buffers are the other classic option, and there are others too, e.g. piece tables.
Meta & co are required by US law to do the same for people in the rest of the world. Didn't see a huge US outcry about that, in fact I saw a lot of hate for things like GDPR
Don't they typically dispose of falcon 9 second stages over the Indian Ocean? That would be happening much more often than test flights.
I believe HN actually had an article for a Minecraft server written in COBOL about a month ago, lol.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42513022
Where is the evidence that Trump wants to federally ban gay marriage? You should learn more about Peter Theil. He is a libertarian.
I really hope people will unflock from most social media, at last for now that it is really at its worst. Perhaps in time, after building some open source social media platforms that does not have these big corporations in charge, things will change for the better.
This nihilistic outlook may make you feel better, but at the end of the day only creates a void in government that megacorporations and malicious actors are happy to fill in.

In case if you weren't merely being facetious, your home country at least has some incentive to work towards your interest, no matter how evil they are because they have to pay the consequences of these actions. Even in autocratic China, for example, anti-lockdown censorship during Covid in China eventually caused even more resentment against the CCP.

On the other hand, look at examples of Russian election interference in 2016 [1]. One of the posts is "Satan: If I win Clinton wins. Jesus: Not if I can help it. Press like to help Jesus win." The entire goal is to get Americans to distrust and hate each other. Nobody in America has anything to gain from posting this, but China and Russia have nothing but to gain from a more fractured America. We only found out about this because Facebook cooperated with American intelligence to find this foreign propaganda. At best, you can't expect the same cooperation from TikTok they are accountable to the CCP. At worst, TikTok would actively be working with China to disguise this propaganda as genuine content.

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/us/politics/russia-2016-e...
in case you are wondering how audiblez becomes an executable in the PATH from a pip install audiblez per the documentation

... audiblez book.epub -l en-gb -v af_sky.

it does not, instead it installs a python package with a cli interface,
to run you then have to prepend python and load the module like this:

python3 -m audiblez book.epub -l en-gb -v af_sky.
That's irrelevant if the information they do send is sufficient to deduce "Eiffel tower" or "dog" out of it: that's too much information to send.
> thought the US dollar was fixed to gold between WWII and 1971

The dollar was convertible into gold at a fixed rate. We still printed more dollars than there was gold.
He said where untrusted parties aren't able to run rsync.

If I was running an rsync daemon facing the public, it would be in a chroot with dropped privileges.
In this modern market? Yes. Hence the article. It's the Tree falls metaphor in my eyes, and in this specific case it does not make a sound as far as I'm concerned.

But if you're taking my "assumption" as an absolute, I don't know what to say. An assumption based on this precise slice of time. Not something that will always be true in all contexts. It's not even always true in this context.

>There's no semantic difference in my mind between this and sending me a note that you've read and rejected my resume

Bots don't send hand written notes. They can, but the costs are a much higher margin than an auto reject email.

You're pretty close to what my main point is, though. Bots aren't an automatic bad, but there feels to be zero effort on the recruiting end this day to try and get quality candidates. That lack of care means I shouldn't spend any energy regarding their (lack of) feedback if all I'm getting back is slop. So I'll just spin the AI roulette again.

Take care.
> maximize spellholder value

This is such a magnificent phrase and I don't think it will ever get enough credit
How does this compare to using Apple's iBook or Kindle reader app and then the iPhone's built in text to voice (the female British voice is pretty good).
> We use third-party dependencies judiciously and never deploy anything without auditing it.

This is how I think it should be of course. Like I said, I'm not against the use of third-party code or dependencies, I'm against using them without performing any audit of that code.
Cases the prosecutors think they can win make it. But OPs statement is valid, prosecutors can just drop any case they fear will set a precedent and under our system that is the end of the discussion. OPs point is it gives prosecutors an additional thumb on the scale when it come to court oversight.
Can an LLM reliably re-format it for us?

EDIT: yes I tried pasting it in to Gemini, 4o, and Claude. Only Claude was able to zero-shot create the latex and an html wrapper that renders it, and open the html preview on iOS. It worked great.
A school which can be choosy in admissions will likely have students with better proficiencies. It's easy to have only top scoring students when you can kick out the bottom scoring ones.

> the point is that people are targeting them because of the religious aspect and not the quality of education

This is the point I'm making. Many people aren't going to end up choosing the school because of the quality of the education, they'll be choosing it because it aligns with their world view. That germ theory is a lie, the Earth is 5,000 years old, scientists are liars out to eliminate Christ from society, and that the only things you need to know is what is in the Bible.
So, I don't claim to have Big Data on this, but I homeschooled my child, and one of the most common things in homeschooling I saw was that people used co-ops. Thus, the kids are around other kids, and the parent doesn't have to know everything.

In my case, I chose it because the public schools in my part of town (low income) were low achieving, and proto-fascist in their policies on being able to control your own appearance. They had both state level (Texas, conservative) and city-level (Austin, progressive) political influences, the worst elements of both.

Just my own experience, but it doesn't much match what the article describes.
Frankly it’s none of y’alls beeswax what medium of content I’m deploying. I can understand restrictions on illegal and offensive content. I won’t be using Cloudflare if including a file or even putting some base64 in my html file will be a ToS violation.

It's these petty restrictions that make these pricing policies convenient, and it hurts the market :(

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumping_(pricing_policy) https://pricecontrol.biz/en/dumping-from-a-to-z/
Nintendo's attorney weighs in on what makes emulators illegal
You're statement is true, would should not do the same thing in terms of discrimination, but the two situations are a bit different. Your talking about culture, while this deals more with a outside government's influence on our populace.

For me, think the ACLU makes a valid argument, that this could set a bad precedent. But, the Chinese government already has a system to at least partially monitor and influence what some businesses do (requiring corporations to have role for the CCP in their charters). https://www.csis.org/analysis/new-challenge-communist-corpor.... It doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility that the CCP uses tik-tok to influence the US populace (think Russia and its use of social media during the 2016 election of Trump).

Yeah, this situation is pretty messy.
> If anything, the Dutch government has been telling people to have cash available in case of emergencies after "geopolitical tension" (read: the Russian invasion into Ukraine). Not that anyone seems to listen, but they encourage having cash reserves.

There is a very strong case for people keeping cash because of its resilience.

People will not do it until something happens to make them realise the problems - maybe cyberwar or natural disaster bringing electronic payment systems to halt.
We aren't talking about drinking-water quantities of water here but about irrigation quantities. Poor people in Arizona are not in danger of dying from thirst. Think Milagro Beanfield War, not Dune. Poor people in Phoenix get their water from the water utility, which gives you 3740+ gallons of potable water per month for US$4.64: https://www.phoenix.gov/waterservicessite/Documents/Rates_Ef...

That works out to 0.032¢ per liter. A quarter (25¢) will buy you 760 liters of water, enough to survive for three months. That's about 1000× lower than a price at which even Phoenix's homeless might start dying of thirst due to the cost of water. (Homeless people don't pay the water utility, but they get water from people who do.)

Poor people in the country get their water from wells, which cost money to drill but basically nothing to pump more water from.

Rationing might be a reasonable thing to do to keep the aquifer from being depleted, but it would be likely to hit poor people much harder than rich people, because poor people don't have the political influence to prevent the enactment of regulations that would hurt them badly, such as a requirement for an environmental review before drilling a new drinking-water well.

Rationing could cause poor people to die from lack of access to water. Markets won't, unless you're talking about something like a Mars colony.
It's actually a useful device when you like to pull an analogy. Instead of explaining the whole idea, you throw a jargon and everyone constructs the rest in their head and understand it and know how to work with it. The whole point of jargon is to have precise definitions, so it works as a rails and compression for ideas.
How much of that is because of US colonialism and how much is on the Europeans themselves who display some of the most conservative (with a small c) attitudes? Mario Draghi's report was a good rebuke to the EU mindset and culture.
Hello, sir? I think you need to go to the hospital, because it seems like you had a stroke or something else serious happen to you.
It seems especially ironic that this would happen in Nevada, where carrying large amounts of cash is much more normal due to the gambling industry.
I didn't know you could use object tags in that way! Thanks. That seems like a great solution if you're cool with an extra request
> elevating

And I shouldn’t have the right to do that because?

I don’t really play any competitive online games but I’d certainly rather install anti-cheat software than garbage like Crowdstrike if I was forced to choose. Anyway different people have different preferences, it’s their business.
Agriculture is an industry. Of course it is. It employs people, it makes use of technology, it is a distinct sector of the economy.
Ninja lets you use django. There's less config vs DRF
Schools used to do this, but the push for risk reduction, metrics, and rules has become so great that it no longer happens. There used to be thousands of student-run organizations in schools across the country. That wasn't a euphemism like it is now-there were no teachers or other adults involved. The kids running them did have to learn to cooperate and make decisions in a responsible way, or face the natural consequences of the group falling apart and social failure.

Now, such organizations are banned. The closest analogue is a "student" council, run by an adult, that might get to choose the color of the wallpaper at prom.
Yes, they're shoved in user's faces and cannot get rid of them, disable them, etc.
It's quite obvious there a Russian shills all over this thread...
> which in turn led to the Oil Shock of 1973-1974

The Nixon Shock caused the Yom Kippur War that sparked OPEC's embargo of America [1]?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis
But they're not asking ByteDance to just divest a portion for US operations, are they? It's successful in many countries, so it seems kind of radical to force them to sell everything just to continue operating in one country.
Yeah, the usual product of excessive greed. It's on the exploited to prove stuff with info they don't have access to. At least Lina Khan gave voided non-competes before capitalism took the reigns again.
"not asking them before you phone home with data" is a basic faux pas for privacy advocates? LOL; that's a fundamental breach of trust of the highest degree, not basic by any means.
US citizens elected representatives to make laws for them. Even more so, this is a bipartisan law.

Tiktok US users of voting age are already accounted for in that process, they don't get extra sway just because they use the app.
Because people will opt for readily-available free trash instead of paying for high quality. And then that quality isn't available to anyone at any price, so everyone loses.

If you haven't observed this in many other markets, you live an unusual (or unobservant) life.
20 dollars? I wanted a peanut!
The connection machine had several modes for the front lights. The one most familiar is "random and pleasing" and the code can be found here: https://trmm.net/CM-2/

Reference: https://thedailywtf.com/articles/Thinking-Machines#comment-1...
Israel and Hamas reach Gaza ceasefire and hostage release deal
Yeah I've heard that angle too. Really nasty. Glad the team wassable to stand up for themselves and walk away from the abuse. Sure wish that could be the outcome more often; it'd fix a lot of things overnight.
Yet imagine a law that mandates seatbelts only for non-US manufactured cars...

The main problem is the hyperoptimized addictive nature of some modern social media apps, not who makes them.
Lol record high stock price, fiercest competitor banned, and cutting 5% of under performers. They're thriving from a business vitality perspective.
Decoupled Django usually means that you are providing a client SPA with a API, such as a DRF powered REST API.

If you are using something like token auth (you mentioned JWT), then you are not using cookies, at which point CSRF is not needed. This is because the user's browser isn't automatically sending the cooking containing a session ID on every request to the server.

That said, you can implement session auth with DRF REST APIs, which accept a session cookie on requests. For this, I believe you would receive/send CSRF tokens via HTTP headers.

XSS is not something you would worry too much about in an API endpoint. It is something you should worry a lot about in your client side SPA though. If using something like React, your templates will be auto-escaped, and thus you have to go out of your way to make it a problem.
WTF? Since when is 1000€ laptop considered cheap?! Just because your work laptop costs double, doesn't mean that 1000€ is a cheap laptop.
This was exactly my experience in the South too.

It's funny that society has the same issue - refusing to expel disruptive students, refusing to imprison or deport criminals, it's all the same.
Scanlan, her name escaped me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9NdaQPjJlo
>> It's civil meaning there is no right to an attorney, the burden of proof is lower, etc.

That's a cute story, but it still goes directly against the 4th amendment, which make no distinction between criminal or civil or any other "type" of law.
It is built to fully support asynchronous endpoints, and uses pydantic models for validation and parsing - lightweight and nicely fast
Yeah, so around 50-100 small companies equivalent.
I'd settle for most dependencies not having any dependencies at all; at a minimum making a serious effort to only add dependencies that really pull their own weight.

This starts from explaining outright which dependencies they have and why.

It's not so much direct dependencies that bother me: it's an exponential explosion of transitive dependencies.

Also, seeing an “end product” with dozens of dependencies doesn't bother me much; a library does.
where does it say optional in hindu scriptures? this is just fake news
Makes sense, since we usually measure rainfall in inches, it's pretty easy to look up weather records for an area to see what the minimum annual rainfall is expected to be.
It reads like a script from Succession.
That's actually one of the ones that shows how the supreme court isn't always party lines. That was an 9-0 opinion to block Colorado from stopping Trump from running for office there.

Also the constitution clearly gives the federal government the ability to conduct federal elections, not states, and that's exactly what they called out in their brief.
> It's not like they threatened to remove you from their service

They routinely do exactly this
Ok but why can’t they take responsibility for the abuse and terminate the accounts themselves, forcing the malicious actors back to being in a position of not being protected by cloudflare?
I wish I liked GOG, but they ignore Linux users, while Steam's Linux support is the best thing that's happened to Linux gaming.
Lots of the farms exist to provide year around salad. What is more important, year around salad or computer chips? Economically, for Arizona, the answer is pretty clear.

This is also why I laugh when people in wet areas talk crap about my state's water problem. My state's problem is your problem too buddy.
Boz here and guilty on all charges. There are plenty of errors if you look hard when sober. There's professional grade coding, then there is coding for hobby projects which blink LED's, when you're drinking beers and listening to rock music in a big shed with a mate.

On another note, somebody asked me to make 30 panels using an RP2040 which I will put up on my site when ready, price will actually be less due to qty. as a side note he did want me to use the RP2350 but nobody has any in stock yet.
AirPod Noises
Sounds like a pair of Corporate SEALs! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUtL6IS7wcY
Well let's not talk in abstract phrases, who did YOU vote for, and did you not find it probable that they would support such actions?
At least post-mortems are filled with dead carcass.
https://pluralistic.net/2025/01/14/contesting-popularity/#ev...

https://freeourfeeds.com/

https://techcrunch.com/podcast/social-media-should-be-built-...

"Social media should be built on protocols, not platforms."
Just a google search away, but the most obvious, british, spanish, dutch royal families, Habsburgs, Thurn und Taxis, hundreds more, also from business life. This "wealth switches hands often" thing is a wise-sounding dumbness, wealth gets more and more concentrated in the world, and is usually only redistributed in event of war and conflicts.
Reminds me of the School -> Pro pipeline where companies sell cheaply or even give away their software to learning institutions so that students who go pro are familiar with their tools and then later recommend it for their work.
The US is a major food exporter with a supply around 125%. Shutting down a few farms in the desert seems worthwhile.
Right, I don't mean literally floating-point errors, but something similar.
This feels so obvious to explain that I can't help but feel like it's condescending, but a conflict is not a genocide, irrespective of it's death toll. If you looked up the definition:

> the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.

Which is just 100% what Israel is attempting to do to Palestine, and they're not exactly being coy about it.
https://www.newsweek.com/australia-social-media-ban-teens-wh...
I'm for the ban chiefly on the grounds of economic fairness in access to markets. China doesn't allow access to any US social media products. We should only open our doors to Chinese companies conditioned on reciprocation.