skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> This looks like someone's personal list not a serious effort.

This has just started. Instead of whining, contribute, the more people contribute, the more "serious effort" it will become.
This blog takes a very narrow view on the subject… more people are realizing how the school systems are and that education can be done in different and even sometimes better ways.
I guess the counterpoint here is that we have lots of data how external actors (e.g. Russia) is influencing large parts of the political landscape in Europe right now.
I have this discussion with my wife who works at a school.

Children are required to be there. The school has to provide them with all manner of opportunities.

On the flip side, the school can't expect anything from the kids other than attendance. They don't really get to expect a certain level of behavior or performance. They can't relegate the bad actors (behavior or performance) away from those who wish to participate fully. Everyone has to be mixed together.

So you give a certain vocal minority that don't care about the education a heckler's veto. They are regularly disruptive and can't be removed.

Nobody has a solution for actually improving that group of student, but there are enough people involved in public education that demand these students be included in the process that they are trying to wreck.
> I'm sure they've seen airplanes flying at night with brighter lights, and louder noises than what starlink produces, so I'm not sure how this is really a problem.

For what its worth planes generally avoid flying through designated dark sky areas.
1. Your 5 year old kid with her pink bike should not be on the street alone. This is just a matter of judgement, independent from other motorists. You should be behind her watching for cars.
2. If you want to ignore point 1, my argument still stands. The chances of a Dodge Ram 3500 ramming into her is far higher if she is on the sidewalk as opposed to on the street. A 5 year old doesn't understand traffic rules good enough to be riding on the side walk and watching for cars. Her best chances are to make herself as visible as possible (ie. by being on the road in a bright bike and protective gear).
> This is "never-cracked-a-history-book" levels of incorrect. Severe depressions recurred about every other decade, and practically every decade had some sort of Global Financial Crisis-esque financial meltdown. Back then, most of these were called "Panic of <year>" instead of "depression" or "recession", until you got to the Long Depression, which was called the Great Depression before the Great Depression itself actually existed.

This is all true. However, average economic growth rates for the American economy were dramatically higher in the 1800s than they have been in the last 50 years.
> I get your point, but not all farms are created equal. Is it really so bad to shut down farms that grow feed for Arab race horses to produce computer chips?

That, I agree. I noticed a sibling comment also mentioned that. If the farms in question are of that kind, it is reasonable. I'd just like to object to the creation of a general sense of sacrificing farms for fabs.
Like a Russian oligarch?
Does that couple also work at the same company as product managers?
dnSpyEx: .NET debugger and assembly editor
Nobody is denying naked shorting exists. What I want to hear is why your beloved GME is going to go up as a result of something that happened 4 years ago.

So your thesis is that the market is rigged, and has always been rigged, but this time it's going to work out for you when it never has before and after 4 years of being wrong?
Hey, author here.

I took extensive notes when playing around with o1 and QwQ-32B. When reading my notes later, I realized that I used the pronoun "they" to refer to a reasoning model. Somehow, it just didn't feel right to refer to o1 or QwQ-32B as "it."

Further, the rate of progress in this field was stunning. The Meta Chain-of-Thought paper that I linked in the Show HN came out last Friday.

So, if our AI overlords are reading this Show HN in the future, I'd like them to know that I landed on the right side of history on this one.
Researchers Make Comfortable Materials That Generate Power When Worn
These 1 and 2 are pretty much always apply at the same time.

Wherever 1 or 2 applies just depends on how used you're to the usage of said jargon.
What about hosting video on R2 and using the CDN?
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42681976
Huh. What are your interests? I'm curious why you think they would come in conflict with those of the US.

I'm confused why you think China's interests are irrelevant to you, unless you truly believe geopolitics is a zero-sum game. We compete in markets, militarily in the indo-pacific, and technologically in ways that are not mutually beneficial.
Jargon like that in the link makes the message less precise and more meaningless, in my view.

Just simply state what you mean. Let the other person ask questions if they need clarification.
helix is a really really good text editor / terminal IDE

I'm seriously impressed by the level of quality out of the box
This makes me want to have someone make a "Consultomancer" as a class just to read the spell descriptions.
My point is you're a bag holding conspiracy theorist who brings up irrelevant talking points as though it's a viable investment strategy.

Yes, the markets are poorly regulated. Everybody knows that. You've been consistently wrong for years and have been losing money but are incapable of learning from your mistakes.
That really downplays the amount of collaboration needed to make a flight like this happen. The airplane was designed and built by tons of people in lots of different counties, building on a century of aviation industry knowledge. The amount of work and experience that goes into making a machine that can safely be 5+ hours from a landing site is enormous.
Jargon feels like 1 for the ingroup and 2 for the outgroup.
> They are banning it now so that the incoming administration can't claim credit for banning it in a few months.

The incoming administration won't be banning things from our food. It will be removing regulations and allowing corporations to put whatever they want into their products no matter what the harms are. I wouldn't be surprised if the incoming administration actually reverses the Red Dye No. 3 ban outright or just guts/weakens the FDA to the point where they can't do anything about it.

We're talking about an administration that previously pulled USDA inspectors out of slaughterhouses and allowed the corporations to police themselves. It killed a rule that forced poultry processors to dispose of chickens with lesions potentially caused by a cancer-causing virus and allowed them to just cut off the tumors (assuming they catch them, they also allowed chicken and pork processors to speed up their production lines, reducing the time workers have to spot problems). It reversed bans on harmful pesticides. It cut back regulations on foods that claim to be "organic". It waived nutrition/calorie label requirements for restaurants, and it allowed food companies to make substitutions and omissions in their products without updating ingredient labels.

I expect we'll be hearing about a lot of listeria salmonella and E. Coli illnesses/deaths in the near future, and much later on we'll be here commenting on articles talking about how deregulation of the food industry and regulatory capture by the food industry have resulted in a lot of preventable deaths from cancers and illnesses.
The one thing I couldn't get past when looking into Unpoly is that if you're in a deeply nested modal/layer, and then refresh the page, it just shows you the most recent modal as a full page. My expectation is that when you refresh, instead it would keep you on the base page, and then wipe all the modals.
Steve Jobs himself restricted the iPad from his own children way back in 2010: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/11/fashion/steve-jobs-apple-...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelsat_708
That makes sense, but means that banning it from making money through (a) and (b) would be sufficient to kill it quickly (if it's a legitimate business, as you said), without directly taking it away from users and causing so much political uproar.
I am talking about Tiktok users, not Douyin. Douyin itself has almost a billion users.

Markets are not countries are not ecosystems. The EU is fragmented by countries but it's a single market, again with more users than the US.

Your stat about revenue is misleading and outdated. Turkey for example generates almost as much revenue as the US, and many markets are currently in the process of being monetized which will take some time, the potential revenue is something Bytedance is going to factor in more than current revenue when it makes a major strategic decision.
For context, https://www.rubyhome.com/blog/swimming-pool-stats/ estimates that there are ~500k residential pools in Arizona. Note that those will likely be smaller than a half olympic-size swimming pool.
AOL Desktop is still a thing in 2025 and was updated as recently as a few days ago.

Michael MJD just did a video on it. Still contains Elwood's classic soundbites, along with some snazzy images of current pop stars like Avril Lavigne.

https://youtu.be/jUsym8iAWHY?si=vU5I15-qWKaEZPwC
3Brown1Blue on youtube if chock full of interesting videos.

"Large Language Models explained briefly": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPZh9BOjkQs

Lots of other stuff also.
It's not like silicon chip manufacturing was an industry that many Americans could get a job in. So it makes sense that the country wouldn't have that many people able to fill these roles, or universities churning out people with those skills.

It's a chicken and egg problem. Which is why this fab will import worker while local universities put into place pipelines to educate potential candidates and hopefully make the industry self-sufficient.
I'm having a real crisis trying to decide whether this system should be called a database or not. It's a system for managing data, so obviously it is.. but by that loose interpretation any CRUD webserver would count too.
As posted elsewhere in this thread, Find My Scanner did some research[0] and the "Victim was in the midst of a divorce before being contacted by scammer." Also relevant, "Victim was groomed for months and months by scammer passing themselves as Pitt's mother, agent, etc, in addition to Pitt himself, using American phone numbers, fake articles, etc."

[0]: https://old.reddit.com/r/UpliftingNews/comments/1i1uvjq/scam...
i would argue, if it’s that powerful, it should be illegal for anyone to have that sort of power. from china to musk to zuckerberg to religions.

we really should ask ourselves why we’re continuing to allow some to continue these abuses…. there should be laws in place to stop all of them.
Those probably already have the tight reentry corridor the parent comment requests
It is. We can argue under which conditions it is legitimate, which is long debate. At some point, it seems that the TOS does make a distinction between legitimate and illegitimate violence, however imperfect it may be.

For example, nobody in their right mind would consider a policeman being distinguished for stopping a shooter as "glorifying violence" even if the officer had to use violence to him down.
What do you mean m$ “has been falling on the gaming front?”
Natrium 'advanced nuclear' power plant wins Wyoming permit
Really appreciate this comment and perspective! In the larger context of immigration and brain drain in other countries, how the US also has one, but of a different kind. Ultimately, it's a loss of potential. I'd somewhat disagree with the directionality of the correlative/causal relation, though. But what can be said is that the US also experiences a knowledge drain towards plainly lucrative jobs. I'd wager that it was/is a cyclical effect that just worsened over the decades and that neither engineers moving to fintech nor low-paying engineering jobs were/are the sole reason.
That's not the original content on the site
One would think GOG would participate in helping to spread the word about this game preservation petition in EU:

https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/#/screen/home

They could put a permanent banner on their website, I'm sure that would bring in some signatures.
The odds of damage are essentially 0 even if there was no diversion. The background risk of a plane crashing with mechanical failures may dwarf this risk.

It's hard to emphasize how comically vast the region described is. Its like... shooting two marbles across Manhattan and colliding.
> What you should do now is acknowledge this in your original post and then explain why they should have been more careful about how they released this feature. Homomorphic encryption of the data reframes what you wrote somewhat.

Do you mean my original blog post? The one that not only mentions homomorphic encryption but also links to Apple's own blog post about it? I don't know how that can "reframe" what I wrote when it already framed it.
It's funny, but it sounds more like corporate/management speak than office jargon.

Employees, when no managers are present, seldom talk to each other like this. Sometimes, the way we actually speak to each other, would get us fired if someone from management was eavesdropping.
I've heard horror stories, where once you hit a certain limit they squeeze the hell out of you. And by that point in time you are locked in and forced to make a deal.

It's made me not use cloudflare for future products. Just charge me upfront what you need to make a healthy margin and let's do business!
I think it's a big improvement. Stiffness is something you can picture directly, so the data -> conclusions inference "stiffness" -> "mass and short range" follows directly from the facts you know and your model of what they mean. Whereas "particles have mass" -> "short range" requires someone also telling you how the inference step (the ->) works, and you just memorize this as a fact: "somebody told me that mass implies short range". You can't do anything with that (without unpacking it into the math), and it's much harder to pattern-match to other situations, especially non-physical ones.

It seems to me like the right criteria for a good model is:

* there are as few non-intuitable inferences as possible, so most conclusions can be derived from a small amount of knowledge

* and of course, inferences you make with your intuition should not be wrong

(I suppose any time you approximate a model with a simpler one---such as the underlying math with a series of atomic notions, as in this case---you have done some simplification and now you might make wrong inferences. But a lot of the wrongness can be "controlled" with just a few more atoms. For instance "you can divide two numbers, unless the denominator is zero" is such a control: division is intuitive, but there's one special case, so you memorize the general rule plus the case, and that's still a good foundation for doing inference with)
The video and audio data that users publicly post?
Think about the implications of the language though. When something is written in rust, management of memory is safer, multi threaded applications are safer, etc... (due to the nature of the language). If something is written in C++, the developer might be more inclined to review the code and tests to ensure proper handling of memory as well as determining if (when there is) non-deterministic behavior is safe. Hence, when highlighting something is written in Rust, it might not be just for the buzzword but also for something like developer confidence.
> I think you've been propagandized because having autocratic private institutions having undue cultural power is proving to be worse for our culture than anything a foreign country has done to us.

That's pure, shameless whataboutism, and one that desperately tries to hide the fact that totalitarian regimes are using social media service as a tool to control you and your opinions.

You can bring up any bogeyman you'd like, but you are failing to address the fact that these totalitarian regimes clearly are manipulating you to act against your own best interests.
In the past, I worked on a project for Luxembourg's CTIE (their IT administration). In most cases, they explicitly requested that we reimplemented features we needed instead of including more third party libraries. They just allowed essential libraries for the project, like Struts for the Web framework, or implementations of standard libraries like JPA, JTA etc. that came with WebSphere. Everything else, we had to reimplement. For them, it was just much easier to manage, given the amount of systems they have to manage. And the allowed libraries were only allowed in versions that they had reviewed before for security issues.
In the end, reimplementing features/functions that we could have included with other libraries was never a reason for any problem : this practice requires some additional work, but has never been significant for the ability to deliver the project as expected.
At Least in the northeast US, there are advanced courses or tracts a student can be placed in if they're above their peers. Is that not the case in your schools?
'Social media should be built on protocols, not platforms' says Mastodon CEO
I will disagree. Stating an obviously empirically false,
easily observed statement immediately does set the table for a bad faith argument IMHO.
I agree, this is a good thing. The previous restrictions were excessive when they worked and unpredictable when they didn't work. It was buggy and error prone. Having a clear advisory from the app when flying in or near a restricted area is sufficient and appropriate. Changing the restriction to a warning will probably reduce the number of newbie pilots wandering into off-limits areas. Previously, a newbie would just assume "It won't let me do anything I shouldn't" but the system was far from perfect. Now, even newbie pilots will know "I need to stay aware of where I'm flying. The system will try to help me but I'm responsible." This is the correct message and encourages the right attitude, likely resulting in an overall safer airspace for everyone.

The article complains that change relies on people complying with the law (and common sense) voluntarily as well as deterrence from the risk of being caught by law enforcement and/or having your drone downed electronically. But that's how nearly all laws work in modern democracies. Bad actors could easily circumvent the DJI restrictions anyway - or just fly an easy-to-assemble DIY drone kit with no restrictions or warnings.

DJI's restrictions were only ever going to help 'keep honest people honest' (and newbies from making a mistake). The article pretending this is somehow like surrendering to anarchy is just completely mischaracterizing the situation. Due to their flight profiles and design, DJI products are good for newbie Costco buyers. Those same traits tend to make DJI drones a poor fit for anyone who wants to break the rules (and not because of the circumventable "restrictions").
This is why introducing a degree of school choice is becoming a popular policy among parents in both parties, but I think bringing back rapid expulsion to disciplinary boys/girls schools would be even more impactful. Unfortunately, recent social justice activism has stymied that possibility in progressive areas. Either restore unfettered power of self-curation to the environment and ensure it is wielded effectively, or parents will demand more flexibility in choosing from non-monopoly options.
> Does anyone have thoughts on why TikTok would choose to stop for existing users?

For the same reason Google or Facebook or many other major players might choose to stop operating in a jurisdiction that's trying to impose restrictions on them that they feel are unconscionable, rather than knuckling under?

The "national security" angle that FedGov is attempting to hang this all on is pretty bullshit... defense contractors that do classified work for the DoD can be foreign owned!
As a SteamDeack owner, I'm really looking forward to see AAA games be Linux-first.

Windows gaming really needs to stop.
I think that is a reasonable conclusion. We don't need state imposed minimum wage and benefit laws for CEOs.

Wages aren't set but effort or value creation, but by marginal benefits of salary
It would be nice if they could also prevent hostile autocratic domestic(ish) powers from leveraging their current cultural power. But they didn't, so naturally those in power are going to build their moat to maintain it.
Currently road maintenance in most places is funded by gas taxes which is more or less fair because if you drive more with a larger car you pay more.

Aside from posturing, the EV transition would end gas sales, thus ending this mechanism for funding roads. A per mile tax seems like a fair replacement.

Unfortunately common sense vanishes when everything is a chance to demonstrate which tribe you're a member of.
It's not the linked article content. It's an even more audience-tailored version that I assume they made up, for our amusement.
Yeah that was what I thought. I've seen their engineers also push for an employment drive for more engineers in the HE space, so I assume they're going to expand its use where applicable, building from the ground up.
I'm rooting for a Twitter ban in Europe. Musk has shown willingness to temper with elections in at least two European countries, and the ban would also leave a message for Zuck.
This is one of those Krazam clips I simply must watch again every time someone links to it.

Another is the one about Omega Star (whose team still haven't got their shit together and implemented ISO dates like they said they would!).
The US government has never provided any direct evidence of their claims of CCP puppet-mastery, the whole thing is generally some combination of "Trust me bro" and "Well obviously China's government is gonna control a Chinese company."

Meanwhile China's reasoning for blocking US companies has been eerily similar arguments the entire time. Hard to prove them wrong when we have the major aristocrats of US tech companies completely prostrating themselves at Mar-a-Lago, offering bribes (er, sorry, the going term is "funding inauguration parties") to the incoming administration in broad daylight, staffing themselves with party officials, etc.

Arguably both are right, and it's a shame because the general working class people of both nations have more in common with each other than they do with their ruling classes. I think the thing that terrifies those in authority the most is the idea that the citizenry might realize this if there's enough communication.
Marginal cost added probably isn't that much. How many manhours does a mac take to build?
Your perspective is valid, but I think its worth reconsidering some of the assumptions youre making. Assuming your child is above average may not always reflect reality. Being above average at a thing does not make you above average at all things. The public education system provides resources like gifted programs, AP courses, and extracurricular activities to challenge / engage students at all levels of above/below average. So if your kid is an advanced learner they can still thrive without being “hamstrung.” I think using terms like “hamstring” dismisses the value public education provides in fostering diversity of experiences, social skills, and engagement with peers.. things that cant be replicated in a homeschooling environment.
This isn't even that surprising. It's been a controversial food additive banned in various countries basically my entire life, and I'm in my 40s.
I'd like to think I minimize the bleedover of corporate/profession-related speech into my daily life, but "orthogonal" and "non-trivial" were just not a standard part of my vocabulary before college. Over a decade later, I find myself saying them a lot.
You strained to look past the parent’s point, nowhere did they excuse the private institutions for their part in this; just that a totally unaccountable foreign power having this capability is not ideal.