skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The NYC subways' electrical equipment is so old it frequently explodes
I'm kind of a cynic, so I'd say that the Workspace customer isn't you, the person who's using Workspace. It's your big company's SVP of IT or whoever who wants to spend money to adopt cool AI stuff so that he can say that he did AI stuff.
As if that’s not the basis of how Amazon interviews, along with behavioral and system design
Free, nothing worth writing home about. Technically you can do this for free with an Apple account but its a total mess of a system and incredibly buggy, not to mention essentially no spam filtering.

Paid you've got ProtonMail and FastMail, both decent options.
He's really talking about aesthetics (the philosophy of beauty) and how we lost the ability do admire beautiful things. The only means we have to assess & debate merit are quantitative (and lossy) so the grotesque dominates.

There are a couple exceptions about apathetic doctors and degrading community, but most of his examples are complicated and ugly things (McDonalds app, the bike ramp, dog mess , etc)
Perhaps you shouldn't have a knee jerk reaction of getting yourself irritated then. The GP clearly said 1/4 students don't speak English, not 1/4 students speak one more language besides English.
AFAIK all wafer ingots are cylinders, which means the wafers themselves are a circular cross section. So manufacturing is binpacking rectangles in to a circle. Plus different effects/defects in the chips based on the distance from the edge of the wafer.

So I believe its the opposite: why are they representing the larger square and implying lower yield off the wafer in space that doesnt practically exist?
Yes, value and benefit are synonymous, but in reference to different objects/choices. There is the financial benefit that doing the work provides, and the financial benefit of paying more.

The pre-cost benefit of having any worker might be $100. If you can get a worker for $10, the marginal benefit or paying $20 is negative $10.
Redundant cores lead to a fault tolerant chip.
Except the robbery isn't illegal because it is legally civil forfeiture which has repeatedly been upheld.

If you want another example of things that technically should be and people think are illegal for the government to do but are not because the government decided the constitution is inconvenient, look at the 100 mile border zone around the US, of which 2/3rds of people live in, that allows the government to ignore the 4th amendment and other rights. If the feds decide they want to search you without cause, they can just claim they think you are involved with or are an illegal and search you and your property without cause or proof of anything and also setup checkpoints and stop and search everyone in it. And even outside of the external borders, airports have also on occasion been considered a border point to justify such searches and checkpoint stops.

Just because some law isn't regularly enforced over some situation doesn't mean there isn't a law somewhere on the books to do so.
Won't. not can't.

They are having their cake. They want non-American labor to lower wages, and American resources, locations, and customers to utilize. Do you see the issue here?
German Marks can also still be swapped for legal tender. That doesn't mean it is possible to use them like the Euro.
In my experience, people tend to grossly overestimate the scale of publicly known organisations; the more publicly known, the vaster and more faceless people imagine it to be.
I had the same idea. Maybe it's a subtle message?

Everyday, at the same time, in the same place, play that instrumental DJ set and with a blank document write down whatever comes to you.

Let me know what you find.
I can't believe TikTok is not just getting around this by using the philosophy many people use when they are forced to change passwords. Just add an "!". TikTok: "We arn't TikTok, we are now TikTok!"
I guess that's theoretically possible, but even in that rare case, people are going to break if they hit someone. Driving too slow causes some accidents but they rarely lead to deaths. AFAIK, driving too slow is such a minor safety issue that no study has been carried out to ascertain exactly how bad it is though.
>due to literal IDF agents running newsrooms across the country

source?

>Polls showing people now recognizing Israel are the bad guys and Hamas are the guys

Are you missing a word here? Or is this intentional?
Also, Bluesky is in no way mainstream. It's a niche platform used by a handful of terminally online people who really hate Elon. Most Twitter users who aren't hung up on ideology are still there.
Of course at the senior level, being able to speak to scope and impact means a lot
My wife hates it when I don't enjoy the TikTok videos she sends me, because it's very easy for me to tell how staged and fake they are. She, on the other hand, neither notices nor cares.

This would be concerning, if I didn't know that this way of thinking was incredibly common these days—instead, it's mildly terrifying.
Doubling and tripling and quadrupling down on behaviors that most consumers wish they'd stop doing. You used to work at Google so you must be familiar with how groupthink operates.
Trump was mad at Netanyahu for being the first to congratulate Biden on winning in 2020.
That's not true. Hamas finally agreed to let Israel monitor the Philadelphi corridor and to keep a buffer zone.

Hamas also finally released an actual list with names of who they would release.

Those were the changes the made the deal. Israel did not change their position.

If you think you are right, then tell me: What did Hamas want that they didn't get before, than now because of Trump Israel agreed to? There's not a single thing, but I'll let you have a chance to find something.
> 2) Which leads me to the Open AI support docs[0]. It seems pretty telling to me that they use old-school search and not an LLM for its own help docs, right?

I agree, but then again, if you're a dev in this space, presumably you know what keywords to use to refine your search. RAG'ed search implies that the user (dev) are not "in the know".
They are short sellers, were you expecting roided out pro-wrestlers with tats and wild hair or something?
Wait, but I like the issue being amplified. Do you not?
I wonder too if the reflective markers are also messing with self-driving vehicles that hit stopped fire trucks. It's been a few years, but this article on Teslas hitting fire vehicles was sobering.
https://www.wired.com/story/tesla-autopilot-why-crash-radar/

The idea that they can't deal with stationary obstacles just makes it all worse, because obstacles happen constantly.
Its 10% to 30%

where did you get 1% from, its a really good bounty system to clean up the markets and you get to be anonymous if you use a lawyer, the trick is to get the SEC to prioritize it. They are now inundated after some large payouts made the news in financial circles
Whatever happened to him that he gave up such a valuable resource for the community? I don't think it can be saved at this point though.
This is just a X employee who really wants more people to see the nice documentation pages they worked so hard on :P
Did you check whether it got all equations right though?
On the other hand, the reason these bans are in place have very specific origins. Facebook for example refused to provide Chinese authorities with information on domestic terrorists in 2009. Facebook has never pulled that off in a western country.

Meanwhile TikTok has worked very hard to work with authorities in the US for pretty much any of their demands.

I don't support any of these bans but I don't think its fair to equate these.
Drupal CMS is designed to be easier to set up than Drupal Core, with such "batteries included" as data privacy protection (GDPR, cookies etc), multilingual tooling, improved accessibility, automated security updates, and a "recipes" feature for quickly adding features.
Yeah, diffusers. Smears first reflection time. Probably some low end absorbtion too.
Do you also object quarks and gluons having "color" charge?

Mass is a bad term because it's loaded with so many meanings and equivalences already. But also in the kindest and most accurate reading here it still doesn't naturally lead to explaining why some forces have limited range the way that term "stiffness" does, which was the whole point of the article.
Who cares if they acknowledge it?

There’s no going back in time and assuming you are financially successful you’re in a very good position to learn how to socialize yourself.

Essentially everybody feels like their parents let them down in some way to some extent. Your parents could’ve socialized you properly and then you’d find some other way they let you down.

Additionally, I didn’t say that most people’s lives are suboptimal. I said that most people’s lives didn’t go according to plan. There’s a pretty significant difference.
> But now I don't get TikTok, AND kids have to run around with bullet proof vests?

WTF? In no way do kids have to wear bullet proof vests. That is a very odd statement.

> They've literally said "Better a dead kid than a red kid"

They have not literally said that.
This bounty program doesn’t require being an employee

Astute observers and outsiders - doing the same thing prolific short sellers do - have received some of the biggest bounty payouts

The source is on the SEC’s bounty payout page
Thanks for sharing. Where in Canada do you think there is going to be a pocket of tech jobs that we can apply to? I'm thinking about moving from QC to Ottawa, but not sure about the outlook.
I honestly wonder about that kind of place. To me, consumers don't go on these platforms, only other makers. So it seems like it's just a place where you can get your idea stolen.

Edit: or best case scenario, bought
The political training in chatgpt has gotten in the way of asking funding and policy questions for basic questions.

I gave it a budget and asked it to give me the programs/departments/etc that have little return of value, overruns, possible fraud, spot problems, etc. so I could outsource or combine departments and save money.

It went on a long lecture that cutting funding was a horrible thing, and I'm horrible for asking, and refused to answer.

Really?

I'm asking basic auditing/restructure/spending, and it was trained to ignore my request and lecture against providing help, and refusal to give results.

smh, this isnt helpful.
In my experience, mandatory code reviews seldom work very well. Usually it's either stamping PRs or you always run the risk of someone just blocking stuff in an unreasonable manner.

For the most part, code reviews should be optional - if you want to get a review from someone, tag them on your PR and ask. If someone you didn't tag spots something and your PR landed, you can always figure it out and still make a fix.

I will give an exception to maybe super fragile parts of the code but ideally you can refactor/build tests/do something else that doesn't require blocking code review to land changes.
> albeit not outright banned it all together

No they absolutely do just ban them.

It's not just that Google or FB can't operate Chinese-specific sites as a business within China, from within China you can't even get to the foreign/international versions of those sites, because they're blocked by China's firewall. Wikipedia has a whole list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_websites_blocked_in_ma...
> Polls showing people now recognizing Israel are the bad guys and Hamas are the guys

Was the second “guys” supposed to have an adjective attached to it?
What legislation are you talking about? They've been extremely transparent about their business through this whole process. They've been asked to do things no other companies are asked to do and they still abide

I'm not a fan of TikTok but its silly not to see the bias here
The article shows them using a single maximally sized square portion of a circular wafer.

I think the proposal you're responding to is "just use the whole circular wafer without cutting out a square".
I totally agree. I upgraded to the AI-enabled version of Google One because they gave a couple week free trial. I found it totally useless, and it reeked of "Some PM said we had to stuff AI in everywhere".

Note I do use ChatGPT pretty frequently, but I've found it much more useful to have a separate space for the kinds of conversations I have with ChatGPT.
Pretty big allegations without any source.
Fair point, but what's the solution? In my eyes it can't be force everyone back to the office, or force everyone to be remote, that feels like an incredibly lazy and devisive solution.
Overcoming pianists' ceiling effect with a hand exoskeleton
I like this version of the same joke (unfortunately no idea what the source is): https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fw...
I think its brought attention to numerous cases of accounting and other shenanigans.

What I've noticed, casually, is that they often target companies or management with a pattern of fraud and abuse, and surprise they keep doing it.

VP of Sales gets slapped on the wrist for illegal tactics?

A few years later he goes on to be promoted to CEO and.... does the same thing!

Amazing.
> Their cause is to universally redefine "woman" to include men who desire to be women, and "man" to include women who want to be men.

This is a reductive view that presupposes gender as a pre-existing discernable static fact of a person's biology as opposed to an apparently extant human phenomena. The idea that they are the same is a profoundly simplistic view of the issue, one not supported by modern psychology or human archaeology, littered with happy societies full of folks we would now consider "gender non conforming". It's not a new cause, nor is it attempting to "redefine" anything.

> We can already see the effects and they're not good

People living authentically is great, actually. Respecting others and their preferences, also good. It genuinely doesn't hurt anyone. The effects to my life are roughly equivalent to my friend Phillip telling me he prefers Phil.

> harmful to women and girls in particular.

In very hypothetical, "just asking questions" ways that have yet to be borne out in any sensible reality. What has happened many times is cis and trans women being harassed for baseless, paranoid reasons. It's especially repugnant a defense when you consider that trans folk - trans women in particular!- are among the most vulnerable to attack and abuse.

If we were worried about harm to women and girls in a tangible, meaningful sense, we would be quick to punish actual perpetrators of verifiable assault than play feminist only when we find a more vulnerable throat to crush.
For better or worse, the incentives created by federal legislation since the 1940s make this healthcare industry consolidation and vertical integration inevitable. Payers (insurers) have been merging to gain more negotiating power over provider rates and hold down medical costs. So provider organizations have reacted by consolidating themselves to maintain their negotiating power and keep rates high. Increased costs to comply with federal and state rules around security and interoperability also drive provider consolidation to achieve economy of scale. Many areas are now dominated by only one or two large health systems. So, the logical next step is for payers to vertically integrate and bring more care in house where they can better control cost and quality.

UnitedHealth Group is hardly unique in this regard. They're the largest but all the major commercial payers (including the non-profit ones) are pursuing similar strategies. Essentially they're copying the existing Kaiser-Permanente model of having a payer and provider organization under one roof.

I'm not defending this system, just explaining why the current structure exists. Any major improvements will require an Act of Congress to better align the incentives with the interests of patients / consumers / taxpayers.
Of course the users don’t want it. Asking a fanbase if the thing they are a fan of should be banned and ignoring all other groups doesn’t make much sense. Nothing would be banned.
Its a reference to Hitler's book Mein Kampf
Ya it was intended to be. I guess I'd probably just prefer to allocate that time and those resources to some other mountaineering expedition or a series of them. There are a few in the cascades (not day hikes), and then maybe the tallest in Canada + the U.S (Logan/Denali), but I'm not actively pursuing any atm, would still be a lot of training and gear etc.. Probably starting even smaller with some 2-4 day summits. Everest wasn't something that was ever in the cards or dreams anyway, but it does now seem to have an image problem.
have you looked at their enterprise prices? one enterprise account pays for thousands (or millions of low-traffic accounts) of free accounts
Give it a month and they should have no problem deploying their inevitable AGI to deliver the opt-out system, right? /S
You will see it in any thread about Israel or Jews. Tons of flagged and downvoted posts. I emailed hn about it.

Unlike those highly motivated people, normal people don't spend time upvoting and vouching, so you end up with a tattered mess of a thread.
Yes. I have been trying to figure out for years why the PBM system is so convoluted and seemingly so much more central to healthcare than it was, and this seems like it must be the reason.
Looking for volunteers, creating a nixvim distribution for Nix development
> This goes so far as to have companies or business units share wafers for prototyping runs so as to minimize cost per device

Can this be done in production? Is there a chance that the portion of the wafer cerebras.ai can't fit their giant square in is being used for production of some other companies chips?
All they're really banning is the app on the App or Play store basically. Anyone who still has tiktok on their phone can continue on and even make a new account. Anyone who cares enough can probably get a cracked APK too

TikTok will probably die slowly not suddenly
The NYTimes widely referenced but debunked story “Screams without words” about alleged rapes on October 7 was co-authored by a literal IDF intelligence agent. Also the Atlantic Editor-in-Chief is IDF. More importantly, why are there so few Muslim newsroom editors and reporters jn the US media vs Jewish editors and reporters?

Polls immediately after Oct 7 showed college students support Hamas more than Israel, and that’s before a year of live-streamed genocide. (Fixed missing word)
> Some links can only be accessed through a VPN.

Step 1. Connect to VPN
Step 2. Open all bookmarks
Dog. When was the last election? The answer is 2006.
But it's not really just "mass", it's "characteristic mass of stationary minimal possible wrinkle in a given field". And it doesn't sound like it has anything to do with force range, and "stiffness" does.
> On the other hand, the reason these bans are in place have very specific origins.

No, they don't.

You think all these sites refused to provide Chinese authorities with legit information? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_websites_blocked_in_ma...

What exactly do you think Wikipedia did that was so wrong? Or Voice of America -- that's an American propaganda outlet sure, but I can get to Xinhua (Chinese state media) as an American easily enough, so why not the other way?

In any case, refusing to provide info on domestic terrorists could be a legit case for bannning a company from operating within your country...but what does that have to do with banning everyone residing in your country from being able to access the foreign versions of those websites on foreign servers?

The simple reality is that China is extremely ban-happy when it comes to foreign websites and apps, even for companies that have never tried to operate their business from within China.
I don't mind holding your hand. Get your search engine out.

"alfa bank" site:theatlantic.com

then compare with anything written by anyone who understands what DNS is.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12841288

The Atlantic trashed their credibility with that absolute fabricated garbage. I am not a trump fan.
Ctrl+F'ed to see if anyone mentioned alienation, since this post basically seems to be OP talking about alienation without them knowing.

I think fundamentally if we want people to care about things again, we are going to need to give them ownership of the things they produce. Otherwise, why would anyone care?
_Workshop_ is definitely a verb, as in "workshopping a play". Its meaning in performance arts is different from office use, but they are not too far apart.
Mathematicians Discover New Way for Spheres to 'Kiss'
Incentives as Selection Effects
Time to pay the piper.

IMO Iran is the winner (least damaged) out of all this. Their proxies are smashed, but the core strength is still the same.

Israel has blown all its international credibility. The International Court of Justice verdict will be very interesting. If it goes against Israel then BDS will (should) become the policy for all countries.
Aside from the obvious risk of short selling is the tornado of lawsuits and threats that arise from targeting shady companies.

Just because some company is accused shenanigans or breaking the law doesn't mean they won't try to litigate you out of existence.

Or that they don't have associates with baseball bats who might visit you in the night to discuss your "bad choices".

It takes some real minerals.
If we don't want this then we simply won't make an account on those platforms...

YOU want this ban and you don't like that OTHER PEOPLE like TikTok. Clearly you don't have a TikTok account and that's not enough. You want to make sure no one else is allowed to have a TikTok account either

Instead of spreading the message about possible harms you'd rather ban other people's abilities
Here's the lesson: We need our social media platforms to be distributed and out of the hands of any government to promote sharing knowledge and creating peace.

When the mass Tiktok exodus tsent Red Book [1] to the top of the App store, it was the first time in history that American citizens started talking directly to Chinese citizens in mass. I've heard all sorts of stories of both sides learning a lot about each other, including the lies and propaganda each others government places in the media, but mostly more positive things like art, fashion, cooking, food, healthcare and -- probably the most important, each other's different humor.

Video, and an AI algorithm to drive the For You page, is probably the most difficult part. We have some good ideas on privacy[2], and I can imagine some sort of crypto ledger system paired with AI learning, but video expensive to store/stream and at such a high volume of streaming, I don't know what kind of end points would really work to keep quality up.

Then there's the problem of policing such a system, and who the police would be. There's some dark places on the internet that I think everyone but a handful of people think should never be allowed on such a network, but more generally there's questions on politeness, stalking, harassment, "facts", memes, and other culture differences that would need to be ironed out.

Who's building this? We need it by Jan 19th, 2025.

[1] Not to be confused with SF's Redbook: https://www.wired.com/2015/02/redbook/

[2] Tim has been making the rounds about his Solid project: https://www.inrupt.com/
Is this an AI response? Has the dead internet lured me in, again? Or, more likely, do you just not care as well?

Every example in the linked post is either "not caring" about the work being done OR aggressively "not caring" due to main-character syndrome/individualism of modern American society. AND on top of it, every political fix is a _feel good_ fix instead of actually fixing the fucking problem.

An "era of good enough" makes no goddamn sense in response to this article. NONE of the things listed are good enough. None of them.