skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> One thing that would make social media much better, is forcing providers by law to ensure everybody sees the same content.

This sounds terrible. I don't want to see the same content as everyone else. A good chunk of Youtube right now is rightwing content that I don't have to see.
Do you have a counter example, or is this just your assumption?
Be the change you want to see and help documenting the missing parts.

Also that is the old wiki but the same stays in the new one.
The US left the gold standard well before 1971. Central banks do not create currency, they create bank reserves. There is no indication that it drives money creation. Let me know where I can spend bank reserves to buy goods and services. Money is created from banks, and mostly done so off-shore away from the purview of the central bank.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurodollar
Do you have kids / wife?

If I was in your situation I would spend ~$5k on high quality backpacking gear and spend March - August hiking the APT.
The lack of empathy of the responses here saddens me. I sincerely hope none of your parents or grandparents are scammed. And I hope you are all educating your loved ones on the threat of scams in this new era when AI fakes are so easy and realistic.
Some people feel good when someone else appears stupider. They'd like to think that they would be smarter in the same situation, and mocking the weak is deeply ingrained in our collective psyche. Considering all the stories of hackers caught for poor opsec hygiene, as well as the perpetrator of this case who was tricked into clicking a malware link himself, and the fact that this is a very long and extremely targeted ops, I'm not so sure such confidence is warranted.

And she's a woman who got a fortune from a divorce. That probably triggered some as well.
That would be an amazingly useful feature of ffmpeg, and considering how large its dependencies are (390MB of packages for `apt install ffmpeg` on a fresh Raspberry Pi OS install), it would be reasonable to have an optional model package.
Wrecking your life is substantially worse than not being a good artist.
You can ignore my following comments if this will make you feel better...

> *If* Uber had become a commercial success in China, Chinese authorities ultimately *would* have clamped down to protect their domestic competitors.

classic demonizing and loser's execuse

> firms that do occasionally find success often face headwinds from Chinese regulators who limit their access to the domestic market.

every other demestic companys face headwinds from Chinese regulators, just like I mentioned above, and Apple, Tesla, Google, Microsoft, they all in same situation, some of them couldn't handle this so they leaved, some stays

Also, DiDi once were banned more than 2 years by authorities, it survived

> Didi naturally had state-backed funding, receiving a significant cash infusion from China's large sovereign-wealth fund

The 'STATE-BACKED' is a typical word used by certain people, it's just some kind of gov investment funds, there're dozens and invested thousands private companys, it's a Socialism country, it's called socialism, what do you expect? Didi is not even a state-owned enterprise. And is this equals to "force to sell"?

> some of the hamstringing restrictions typically imposed on foreign businesses.

Bruh

> China is well-known to have intense domestic favoritism.

That's true, and? many Chinese people also have intense domestic favoritism

BTW, Apple is losing market share in China. However, take it easy, I don't think Apple will be sold to Huawei. Moreover, Apple is produced by Chinese and Indian, why bothered?
Photoshop existed 10-15 years ago. TFA has no photos but I’m pretty sure even my paint.net imaging skills would be enough to trick such irrational person.

the world catches up, and no one will trust images, videos and voices anymore

The person in spotlight didn’t trust her daughter who tried to “catch her up” for a year. This is not the case of a single person with no source of critical thinking.
Wow, and Democrats controlled both houses for the entirety of Nixon's term. He must have been quite a diplomat for all his shortcomings. Makes sense why a lot of his key acts were actually quite progressive for the environment and workers' rights. I had it in my head that the US system allowed for more executive power than the UK's, but I guess it really depends on the outcomes of lots of different elections.
It's likely hardware; things like POPCNT which we encountered in the wild when some folks were trying to run our software on ancient (15+ years old) CPUs that technically still supported Windows 10; so we changed our support story to Windows 11 only because that forces newer hardware requirement as well.

I don't think they will actually crash on Win10 on purpose; this likely just means they won't be running automated tests on Win10 at some point (though probably not now considering companies can keep paying big bucks for back-compat support).
Use them
They are very sure. There are lots of different things that happened in the late 60s and early 70s through to the early 80s that substantially affected the economy. Focussing on 1971 makes it clear that they think only one of those is significant.

It's much more effective to let a reader make their own conclusion from cherry-picked data than it is to state the conclusion outright.
This is both right and wrong in a pernicious way.

When pointing out a problem, you don't necessarily need to provide a better solution. However, if you refrain from providing a better solution, you are still implicitly asserting that there exists some better solution.

So then it's possible to counter that with: a better solution may not exist. If you think a better solution does exist, then the burden of proof is on you to point out an existing solution that does better, or to otherwise establish that some better solution must exist.

Rust could very well be at a global optimum for the problems it's trying to solve. Sometimes tradeoffs are just inevitable.
Click it because norepinephrine-impacting drugs include ADHD and depression meds.
*it won't be in the future because it is no longer the grabbag for everything.

Also linking things to /usr/bin is done by the fhs which uses bubblewrap, not steam-run.
I tend to avoid their office suite, is the online version mature yet? If so, then who cares which platform they support their native apps on?
"The Tim Tebow CFL Chronicles" (2014)
Surreal fiction. In this decade, oddly enough, it looks like the HTML works better on mobile than otherwise.
I hate this fucking site lol
US to ban Russian, Chinese software and hardware in vehicles
"In October 1973, the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC) announced that it was implementing a total oil embargo against countries that had supported Israel at any point during the 1973 Yom Kippur War, which began after Egypt and Syria launched a large-scale surprise attack in an ultimately unsuccessful attempt to recover the territories that they had lost to Israel during the 1967 Six-Day War. In an effort that was led by Faisal of Saudi Arabia,[1] the initial countries that OAPEC targeted were Canada, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis
If productivity increases are driven by capital investments, why should the workers capture any of those benefits?

For example, if I have a guy digging holes with a shovel, but then I buy a backhoe with an auger, he is now maybe 100x more productive than he was before, but should he get paid more because of that? His life is actually easier now, maybe he should get paid less?
Extracting app data from Android 12/13 (pre-March 2024 update) without root
you mean One Taiwan Policy
Heck, China forced Apple to divest iCloud to the government of Guizhou.
I deleted my Facebook in 2016, and when I tried to create a new one they banned me as "inauthentic". I've seen people complain about the site demanding a government ID scan, but I'd have been willing to prove I am who I am if given the chance.

Now I can't delete my Instagram, which I was using FB SSO for. They ocassionally send me marketing emails that I might want to engage with so and so's content.

How, when you nuked my goddamn account for no reason?

Anyways, if I had the money I'd short them -- they seem to be completely unconcerned with the few who'd consider giving them a second chance.

As for Tik Tok, as with Telegram having it's servers in Russia, I think the real issue is the data is in control of the PRC, rather than whinings about "fake news" -- people have consumed supermarket check out drivel like the Weekly World News for years, it's just moved online.
I don't; I consider it the market working.

During COVID, I'd have preferred to be able to buy a roll of toilet paper for $5 than to have the price unchanged but the stores totally sold out for weeks.
>How do you engineer this, do you think? If every burgerflipper at Wendy's owned stock, the performance of that stock isn't connected to performance of their job at all. They can fuck off completely, and the stock either rises or falls. Even if we tie it not to traded stock, but some sort of profit-sharing of that one franchise, there are 40 or 50 workers, minimum, all of whom have been trained to coast along and hope someone else has to do the real work. One could hope they (and the other workers) would learn that their contribution is essential before it goes out of business, but that's absurdly unrealistic.

That's not really true at all. If they fuck off completely, they're either getting fired, or if everyone at the store takes the same stance, the store closes entirely. If enough stores close, the stock dips.

I'd counter with: what's stopping them from fucking off right now when they don't have stock? Why would stock inherently make them more likely to fuck off? Just like executives, the stock would vest over a period of time. And clearly nobody is talking about giving $500k in stock to a person making $5/hr. It is commensurate to their salary.

>It was never that way for any significant fraction of the workforce. Sure, if you worked for one of the Fortune 100 companies, already wildly successful. But anyone struggling at their city's paperkill or textile mill or whatever, there wasn't stock and pensions. And at the biggest companies, unions managed to wedge their foot in the door to the point that you had UAW workers and the like quitting the week after lunch on Tuesday because they'd made quota. It was good for them, personally, of course, but to the long term detriment of the very businesses that employed them. They too, despite their stock and pensions and vested interest int he financial success of their companies and ownership stakes, just sort of coasted along and let it all fall apart.

This literally didn't happen, and I find it laughable you're portraying unions as a horrible blight on the working man. You might want to go a bit further back into history and look at what the factory conditions were like prior to unionization. If you think that would've just naturally occurred without unions, you're delusional, and need to look at all the non-unionized places we've outsourced manufacturing to, and what their work life looks like. Hint: exactly like it was in the US prior to unionization.

Then take a look at unionized manufacturing economies in Europe. Hint: they didn't get that standard of living because businesses just thought it was the right thing to do.

But in summary, your argument appears to be: people are lazy, and if you give them more they'll just stop trying. Which might be one of the most absurd takes I've ever heard on the subject.
It's not really free. One day, you get a call from their sales team saying "you're straining our network". I kid you not. We were on a business plan and still got this. When we met them in person, we were asked to upgrade to a $2000+ per month plan. From a $200/mo plan. That's a 10x increase. I searched their TOS, nowhere it was mentioned about "straining their network". Turns out that's just their scammy tactic to get you to pay. We refused. That really left a bad taste in my mouth.

Today, I refuse to recommend any client or startup to them because of this extremely unethical practice. All around, I'm not sure they deserve so much positive press/attention, especially after screwing some of their own employees (one even got super famous live streaming the firing).
> that have much lower risk scores (as they are from plant and animal sources)

This is a fallacy. If anything, there's more reason to expect that a substance evolved to serve a biological function (that happens to be red) would have biological effects in humans than a substance developed specifically to be red and be biologically inert.
So, this is all your fault?!
Are you suggesting that Germany is not "free" to choose to have economic relationships with e.g. Russia because of United States military reasons? Do you think the US military is the primary reason Germany (the people, the government) is reluctant to trade with Russia?
> It's also not cool to take a bus as upper classmen.

What say you did something uncool. Others might follow. It is the best solution.
What about the tens of millions of people who have been killed because atheism?

But how about this: the first time that any relevant powers decided that slavery was wrong at a global level was due to Christian beliefs, fancy that. And luckily they went on to impose that moral belief to the rest of the world. (England, France vs. Slavery)

It's true that a lot of evil has been done in the name of Christianity, but that's not of Christianity. If I came to your home and punched you in the face in the name of your mother, would you blame your mother?

But Christianity and the Bible have been abused very wrongly by evil powers as tools for control, something possible through deceiving illiterate, uneducated people.

As some other comments mention, Protestant Evangelicals made a big push for literacy precisely so people could read and interpret the Bible themselves, without depending on interested third parties.

Anyone taking a little time to read the Bible will see and understand that the Crusades were wrong, racism is wrong, oppressing women is wrong, and so on.
Social media is the front line of an ongoing cyber war. It is a matter of propaganda and social engineering.

Imagine if Japan owned all the newspapers in the run-up to WWII.

That's not to say China is the only one with propaganda.
So why isn't it on Slack to address this (or not use OAuth, if it can't)? Google doesn't verify the actual legal person behind an email address, whether it's through gmail or google workspace, nor would we want/expect them to.
you really think the CCP cares?
Does an esp32 count as Chinese hardware?
Is posting about CEOs allowed there?
It's too little, too late, but I'll still take it. However I still have a hard time believing banks and other private actors will go through funding 20+ years projects like nuclear reactors in today's short-termist economy.
How many transitive dependencies is the right number for a database?
Another big learning from this is that "not all sleep is created equal." What happens during NREM isn't the same as what happens during REM.

Which surprises me because I thought we were all taught that REM is the best kind of sleep (and the hardest to induce). But also doesn't Ambien reduce the amount of time in REM and increase NREM.

I'm confused again. Someone better educated than me care to explain?
Do you happen to have a link for that comic?
Mature? Yes. Better than Gdocs, debatable, but IMO yes. Replacement for the desktop app? Not quite, but it depends on which feature you specifically need.
The gold standard disincentivizes consumption, and incentivizes savings. Plain and simple. Of course corporations love consumerism, and that's what the central bank fiat regime has enabled: wanton consumption and dwindling away the wealth of society.

If you're wondering why everything in society outside of technology is getting worse and being replaced with cheap substitutes, you need to look at the money itself.
Considering the number of graphs on this website where it's immediately clear that 1971 wasn't the inflection point (in many cases, it's actually around 1980), it's not hard to make this for any other year, especially if you don't care to make it all that convincing.

What makes 1971 truly special is that only goldbugs who really want the gold standard again are insane enough to believe that deviation from the gold standard single-handedly fucked over everything and have the chutzpah to tell you about it even when their own evidence clearly says they're wrong.
Thanks for the encouragement! Truth be told, I had never thought of myself who could take things from 0 to 1 until I read this comment :)
I don't understand a thing about most of the subjects depicted in those charts so I can't discuss their contents. But couldn't it be another case of confirmation bias and correlation not implying causation?

In other words, if I pick a random year since, perhaps, 1950 and try to find charts where that year is an inflection point, would it be different to 1971?
It is fair to argue that the oil crisis acted as a catalyst rather than a root cause for dismantling elements of the social contract. The crisis illustrated vulnerabilities in the postwar economic order, provided a convenient pretext for shifting economic policies, and exposed a population that, for various reasons, was less unified and mobilized than in earlier decades.

While the ruling class had long-standing interests in undermining their “extracted duties” under the social contract, the oil crisis gave them a plausible narrative and a set of conditions that made such changes appear more justifiable and less resistible shifting the narrative from away from collective welfare solutions and toward individual responsibility and market-driven approaches.

I kind of view it as the oil crisis serving as a stress test that revealed the fraying unity and decreasing mobilization capacity of the general populace which occurred alongside broader cultural and political shifts in the 1970s that coincided with a decline in trust in institutions (partly due to events like the Vietnam War and Watergate).
the West can take the other half
No one who actually uses it or understands it wants this. This is like vegans banning steak.
On the visual feedback of the exercises. Does this look better?

https://www.loom.com/share/9c90ab0512ff46e0892f77e682545aa2
What if your next job application was evaluated not just by qualifications but by an AI that explains its decision better than most hiring managers?

The future of AI-driven job recommendations lies not just in matching talent to opportunity but in making the process transparent, fair, and explainable for all stakeholders. Candidates seek clarity on career progression, recruiters demand insights into organizational fit, and companies prioritize market trends—all needs addressed by advanced systems like OKRA, a graph-based AI model.

Despite breakthroughs in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and interactive interfaces, challenges such as rural recruitment bias and explanation coherence remain. By merging AI's analytical power with human insight, these systems are set to transform recruitment into a more equitable, collaborative process for everyone involved.
I can see that. I think it is difficult to actually pin down to an actual year. But definitely a bit after 1971.
> I don't think they care much about few "Pro" upgrades here and there. The real money, and their focus as a company, is in enterprise contracts.

Cloudflare's enterprise customer acquisition strategy seems to be offering free or extremely cheap flat-rate plans with "no limits", then when a customer gets a sizeable amount of traffic they will try to sell them an enterprise plan and cut them off if they don't buy (see https://robindev.substack.com/p/cloudflare-took-down-our-web...). IMO this is pretty shrewd, as it means that companies can't do real price comparisons between Cloudflare and other CDNs until they already have all their infrastructure plugged into Cloudflare.
That's technically correct, but they listed several ways they contribute back to the OSS ecosystem: PRs, issues, creating new libraries...

This comment makes it seem like all this company does is take, which feels unfair to me
Agreed, the dependency list looks extremely boring and completely auditable to me.

The dependencies are modular, not diffuse.

I think people saw the title, and got triggered into hate. When actually, this seems author-submitted, and they were probably just trying to be humble about their accomplishment. It's not even the title of the article.
The way that the embedding is done is using Matryoshka Representation Learning, truncating it allows to compress while losing as little meaning as possible. In some sense it's like dimensionality reduction.
We're incredibly biased since several members of our team worked at Cloudflare, but we spend ~$20 a month on Cloudflare for our startup and it is fantastic.

- Marketing videos on stream

- Pages for multiple nextjs sites

- DNS + Domain Reg

- cloudflared / tunnels for local dev

- zaraz tag manager

- Page rules / redirect rules for vanity redirects we want to do.

The list gets longer every day and the amount of problems we can solve quickly is amazing. The value to money is unmatched
"communist country"

I didn't realize China had eliminated class and that companies were worker owned.
Strictly speaking it isn't banned in the EU, it is banned in the EU _with the exception of processed cherries_. Quite why the cocktail cherry industry was considered so critical that it received a specific exception is unclear.
I think the not caring a damn is a condition of the sale.
These regulations fit pretty well with the Democrats platform but until now they would have been near impossible to pass.
Should it be mutable or not? Seems reasonable to answer up front by choosing const or let.

What are other considerations?
I'd also point out the following from Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince's wiki page [1]:

> "Prince co-founded Unspam Technologies, which supported the development of Project Honey Pot [2], an open source data collection software created by Prince and Lee Holloway designed to gather information on IP addresses used by email-address harvesting services."

> In 2008, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) contacted Unspam Technologies, asking, "Do you have any idea how valuable the data you have is?" The DHS' email served as the impetus for Cloudflare, a technology company Prince co-founded with Holloway and fellow Harvard Business School graduate Michelle Zatlyn the following year

> The DHS' email served as the impetus for Cloudflare

Emphasis mine. I love Cloudflare, their tech is amazing, but to bury our heads in the sand that it wasn't started from day one to be a government spying program would be extremely naive.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Prince

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Honey_Pot
Google raises the price of Workspace plans, includes its AI features for free
Your questions around why we need sleep make me wonder if we could develop a drug cocktail to do that work for us while we're awake. Similar to Iain M. Banks' "Culture" book series where humans can inject themselves with their "drug glands" to improve their capabilities.
We need a database of any cop, lawyer, prosecutor or judge that participates in this type of bullshit. Identify, track, punish! Tyrants have home addresses!
I've always wondered if there is an accounting benefit for them. Can the free tier be charged as 'marketing'? No idea how you would internally break up the costs, but it could make your margins look better.
It's not exactly what you're suggesting, but Spurious Correlations is great fun: https://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations