skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I’m definitely running it unsupervised and without understanding what it does
Yeah, that's a good point, and I've actually been terrible at getting projects done recently. Maybe a key question should be how few datasheets you can get by reading?

By the way, I'm living in America, too.
From that list, I believe Server-Side Components is a big offender in terms of complexity.

React Router changing its API so often felt unnecessary too.

I wouldn't call all of that churn though, as I believe most devs only had to deal with a subset of those. Some who got into React in 2019 could be writing the same kind of code today.

Frontend as whole, on the other hand...
That would be true if RSA scaled proportionally with the number of bits, but the exponent involved is much lower than 1. 1024->2048 gives you around the same difficulty as adding 30 bits to a symmetric key.
> Raves and clubs are different expressions of what is essentially the same fashion.

This is a very efficient way to communicate that you don’t have experience with raves and/or clubs.
Agreed. Nihilism and fatalism are both cowardly.
Discussion yesterday (12 points, 7 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42625095
This is really the issue. There are plenty of places people can live and afford. But everyone wants a particular lifestyle and a certain job in their desired field and maybe proximity to certain people. That sense of entitlement has been rebranded as an affordability crisis but it isn’t that. It’s just entitlement. People should instead live within their means and make sacrifices. Not everyone gets to live in highly desirable places like SF and that’s okay.
The enormous amount of fear that has been injected into society, seemingly permanently, disguised as "safety" (i.e. framing a negative as a positive) is one of, or perhaps THE, the most detrimental factors to the health of that society, and is actively harming the development of people growing up within it.
Or life could have an impact on when you drink your coffee.
fun :-)

say, why don't you move mirrors but the whole laser?
> How do you suppose we do that in the US?

Exempt or lighten planning requirements for affordable housing construction. California is going in this direction now.

There are other levers like subsidized financing for developers building homes targeting a certain price range as well as favorable tax treatment of those profits.

A lot of these have would probably have some bipartisan support.
> You really should be able to express the required cleanup semantics with "defer"

I'm perfectly able to do that, I just don't want it, because the result is terrible. The syntax no longer shows what happens when and where.

And, if you look at n3434 <https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n3434.htm>, you can see the following gem:

> the deferred block may itself contain other defer blocks, that are then executed in chain according to the same rules

This is the worst possible outcome. It means that a continuation passing style sub-language gets embedded in C.

{
defer { a(); defer { b(); }; c(); };
defer { d(); };
}

At the final closing brace shown, d() will be invoked first, then a(), then c(), then finally b(). Syntactically, the invocations appear in a-b-c-d order in the source code, but the actual execution is neither that nor the inverse d-c-b-a nor the single-level inverse order d-a-b-c.

THAT is an unreadable mess. Good luck debugging that. Not dissimilar to chaining futures in modern async C++ (lambdas deeply nested in lambdas). Which is an abomination.

Your source code syntax is now completely detached from the execution order within a single thread.

Good luck getting that past code review.

Your reference to "no take only throw" makes no sense to me. The gist of that meme is "various characters making contradictory demands". Nobody is making demands here. There's no need for an "explicit alternative". Just don't defer at all, regardless of style. Write the error path / exit path explicitly, using gotos or the arrow pattern.
Nobody is recommending RSA-3072 per se. The recommendation if wanting to stick with RSA is to move beyond RSA-2048, and the world at large jumped all the way to RSA-4096 long ago.
Music is about nuance, finesse, expressivity.

You don't have that with a computer keyboard.
Music is hard, don't set yourself for failure so early, for no good reason.
My wife, who has been a raver since the 90's, is currently out collecting free Narcan doses to deliver to people throwing raves in Southern California. Party organizers need to really step up and have Narcan on hand, but most don't.
It's not just raves, it's pretty much all "nightclub" type bars. The common nightclub has been replaced by expensive, high-end, bottle-service only type clubs.
> Its own answers, with feedback about whether the answers seem to have worked.

Unless the feedback from the failing code review is piped back into the model it will still repeat the same garbage.
MIDI isn't enough. I want MIDI + filters, plus separate voice and custom sounds tracks.
Sylenth has a free trial. Garageband probably has an analogue synth in it. There's also v station:

https://stgdownloads.novationmusic.com/novation/novation-sof...
My recollection from real analysis was that I liked sequential continuity a lot (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_function#Sequences_...).

Sequences form a nice beginner-friendly monad (`bind` is the diagonal nth from nth), and lifting a real function over a real sequence is just `fmap`! (This is the same notion of sequence that https://clash-lang.org/ uses for sequential circuits, but it skips the monad because circuits are first order.)

Convergent sequences are like ordered binary tree sets, they do also form a monad, but one in a sub-category: sequentially continuous functions are precisely those that are in the domain of the underlying functor! :)
The idea isn't to stop Google from signing and validating DKIM. It's that the major players who do DKIM should rotate and publish their keys, so that at any given instant their current DKIM key is only valid for N hours, and after that it's public, so anyone can forge backdated messages.
I've already got a pretty good cowboy costume setup. Does this mean I should buy a pickup?

>The most potent, the Ford, has a twin-turbocharged V6 that makes 450 hp.

Pfft. The Chevy Silverado EV makes 760 hp.

https://www.edmunds.com/chevrolet/silverado-ev/2025/features...
This is all well and good. You can have thousands of "mark of approvals", but is the most important item needed required ?

User upgradability if the Company Folds or Sunsets the product. When that happens, the user will need to buy a new device or live with comprised devices. Most will live with the comprised device.

So, IMO, the product should be fully open source and easily upgraded in order to get the Cyber Trust Mark.
The truth is, there is no such thing as “fuck you money.” It’s a myth, optimized like most of the other American myths, to make the hamsters spin the wheel just a little faster.

Hard disagree… I strongly believe (perhaps subjectively as I am surrounded in some ways by them) there are a lot “regular” people who reached FU money and are living their lives to the fullest vs. billionaires who are dick measuring 24/7 with other billionaires
Articles start sinking as a result of flags long before they get the tag.
Making mobile platforms second class citizens was wrong.
If you want to try something fun:

Provision a 4096-bit DKIM key.

Every online DKIM/SPF checker will say all is good when looking at your DNS.

They will also fail any test email you send, with more or less excellent descriptions such as:

STATUS: Fail

DKIM: Pass

SPF: Pass

There's this fun thing that, apparently:

It's permitted and valid to use keys larger than 2048 bits in your DKIM entry.

It is not, however, required to process keys larger than 2048 bits.

This cost me some hair to learn the hard way.
I'll throw another idea here I've been thinking from a time now.

Most languages have a while construct and a do-while.

while(condition){block};
do{block}while(condition);

The while is run as

...
start:
condition
branch-if-false > end
block
branch-always > start
end:
...

And the do-while switches the order:

...
start:
block
condition
branch-if-true > start
...

The issue with the while is that more often than not you need to do some preparations before the condition. So you need to move that to a function, or duplicate it before and inside the loop. Do-while doesn't help, since with that you can't do anything after the condition.
The alternative is a while(true) with a condition in the middle.

while(true){
prepare;
if(!check) break;
process
}

But what if there was a language construct for this? Something like

do{prepare}while(condition){process}

Is there a language that implements this somehow? (I'm sure there is, but I know no one)

The best thing is that this construct can be optimized in assembly perfectly:

...
jump-always > start
after:
process
start:
prepare
condition
branch-if-true > after
...
Where did the phrase "mad as a hatter" come from?
I use surname.id for my domain. A main concern for me (and apparently others in this thread) was making sure that when I had to dictate the email over the phone that it wasn't confusing to the person on the other end.

Beyond that, I just host my email with Proton which has been a really pleasant experience.
need to adjust the timespan https://old.reddit.com/r/functionalprogramming/top/?sort=top...

ps: nice punchline https://imgur.com/a/5g9wxPg

pps: thanks for the sub
I can't get to worked up about the way the surveys were conducted since this was advertising. If R.J. Reynolds were trying to publish peer reviewed papers based on there survey results and excluded the fact that the doctors were given free cigarettes that would be more of an issue. I'm sure much worse stuff was done in an effort to hide the health effects of smoking but it's not something I have familiarity with.
That's actually interesting. Do you have some suggestions of where I could read more? Or others have suggestions?

(My group theory background is only from abstract algebra, quantum, and a bit of poking around)
> In the short term a reduction in energy intake is counteracted by mechanisms that reduce metabolic rate and increase calorie intake, ensuring the regaining of lost weight.

If calorie intake increases, then it's no longer "calorie restriction".

If his actual claim was that calorie restriction does not cause weight loss, then that's wild despite your quote.

> I'm not going to go on and on...

Well you didn't address the other really egregious supposed claim, that "non-nutritive sweeteners have the same impact on fat/weight gain as sugar". If that's an accurate description of his stance, that's really bad.
This isn't about evidence. In a court case, discovery and court orders can authenticate email messages even if providers publish their keys; the provider will have a record of having verified the email when it was received. But ATO attackers will not have access to those records.
Unusual $/MTok Numbers
Fully solo can be a lot of fun sometimes, but a good team that complements each other makes the days so much more enjoyable. I've worked on many projects where I could almost completely ignore our front end because we had great front end engineers that loved doing that part. A good team that fills the gaps you don't enjoy or know and vice versa is a wonderful time.
microtonal midi would be super awesome
Autism and hypermobility (e.g., Ehlers-Danlos) are highly correlated. I have both, with ADHD thrown in.
The price of every good and service is a function both of willingness to pay and supply.

Positional goods cease to be so if you substantially increase their supply - this is why Rolex, Gucci, etc are constantly worried about knockoffs.
You should say only major browser that fits those categories because examples of the latter exist- Orion uses WebKit and Zen uses Gecko- and I imagine the former is even more common.
Honestly it would be pretty good if they did. :D I'll lose my 20 customers so far, but I think it would be a good thing.
At what point are you just doing async and coroutines?
I stand corrected, thanks! 2^30 still means a billion times better.
At the time, I was a punk working in a great record store in the Western suburbs of Chicago (shout out to Johnny B Goode Records & Stuff!). I sent a number of promo disco records we'd received to Disco Demolition Night. I still laugh about how it turned out... Those were the days.
Do your crawls from some place that isn't AWS. I bet there are many obscure data centers that aren't on their list.

I was brainstorming for answers to the paywall problem (e.g. system has to see what's behind the paywall) and one answer is a browser extension that can access everything the user's web browser can access (that user subscribes); in many cases this could be made pretty transparent.
Yes - sitting at home and looking for companionship on an app is better than leaving the house, interacting with other people, dancing, laughing, singing, making lifelong memories ::eyeroll::
> And secondly... Are the second vacation homes really the problem? I'd guess the problem begins around 3rd or 5th, not the second one, which is a fairly common and usually also a good thing to have - for both the owner and the society.

I'm not sure if you mean owning one primary home and two vacation homes, or one primary home and one vacation home when you mention a "second vacation home," but either way this strikes me as out of touch.

In 2024, US home ownership rate is 65.6%. (https://www.bankrate.com/homeownership/home-ownership-statis...)

In 2022, 4.6% of housing was comprised of second homes. (https://eyeonhousing.org/2024/09/the-nations-stock-of-second...)

4.6% of 65.6% is 3%, meaning at most 3% of Americans own a second home (but this doesn't account for citizens that own 3 or more homes, so the actual percentage is even lower.)

I don't consider that to be common. I also wonder: why is it a good thing for society (or even most homeowners?)
> AVX512 was that strategy’s zenith and it was a disaster for them since they had to cut clock speeds when AVX-512 operations ran while AMD was able to implement them without any apparent loss in clock speed.

AMD up until zen 5 didn't have a full AVX-512 support so not exactly a fair comparison. Intel designs don't suffer from that issue AFAIU for couple of iterations already.

But I agree with you, I always thought and I still do that Intel has a very strong CPU core design but where AMD changed the name of the game IMHO is the LLC cache design. Hitting as much as ~twice lower LLC latency is insane. To hide this big of a difference in latency, Intel has to pack larger L2+LLC cache sizes.

Since LLC+CCX design scales so well AMD is also able to pack ~50% more cores per die, something Intel can't achieve even with the latest Granite Rapids design.

These two reasons let alone are big things for data center workloads so I really wonder how Intel is going to battle that.
I don't think that Linux capabilities have much to do with the capabilities that the OP intends.

In a capabilities system, a program has permission to act on any object if it has a reference (aka a capability) to the object, there is no other access control. A program acquires a capability either by receiving it from is parent (or caller in the case of a function) or some other way like message passing. There is no other source of capabilities and they are unforgeable.

Unix file descriptors act in many ways as capabilities: they are inherited by processes from their parents and can be passed around via Unix sockets, and grant to the FD holder the same permissions to the referenced object as the creator of the file descriptor.

Of course as Unix has other ways from creating file descriptors other than inheritance and message passing is not truly a capabilities system.
They were asking for evidence that people have been convicted based on screenshots of emails, almost the opposite of using DKIM to authenticate emails.
> growing popularity of the traditional Latin Mass

there is no such thing as a "growing popularity" of the mass in latin.

because, surprise, the spells work just fine in any language. because, surprise again, Jesus spoke Aramaic. and the educated spoke Greek.

PP Francis is putting the whole misguided "Jesus sacrifice" liturgy and it's backwards thinking back to where it belongs: history books.
> It's completely typical to expect someone who makes a surprising factual claim to back it up with evidence.

A citation does not necessarily provide evidence, it only guarantees the words of a third-party. A third-party can spout complete nonsense as well as anyone else. The request ultimately serves to appeal to a flawed assumption that a third-party's words are more valuable than the words of who you are speaking to.

Which also incorrectly assumes there is someone else's words to even draw from. HN is well known for attracting experts in their field. It could have very well been that the parent commenter is the only person who knows anything about the subject. There may not be anyone else. Even if there was, to dismiss his knowledge as the hypothetical leading expert to hear from some other random nobody doesn't make sense.

But, to give the benefit of the doubt, if we assume there is a greater subject matter expert who can give you better words than the parent to describe the knowledge you seek: What purpose does the middleman serve? Why not talk directly with the expert? You are going to get a lot more out of it. The middleman, if not a valuable party to the subject, isn't going to relay what is most useful if for no other reason than because he doesn't know what is useful. A citation remains pointless.

> You're talking to them because you think they might know something you don't

Of course. Which, again, questions why you would want to defer to a third-party? If you have good reason to believe someone knows something you don't, why wouldn't you want to hear it from them directly in their own words? As I said before, in this case elaboration is what would be valuable. A citation is not. A citation is completely useless here. While citations do have a place, asking for a citation in the middle of a conversation is a fallacious device.
It needs SPDT switch, and that rules out most of buttons.

And if you do end up choosing SPDT switch, then there are much simpler designs which have switch toggle between Vcc and GND, like Don Lancaster's debouncer [0]. That design is especially useful if you have many switches, as you can wire all VCCs and GNDs in parallel, and use 8-channel buffers to debounce multiple ones.

The SR latch schematics only makes sense if you are working with TTL logic (popular in 1970/1980) which did not nave a symmetric drive output pattern, and there is absolutely no reason to use it in 2000's.

[0] https://modwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=275228&sid=52c0...
Kei trucks:

a) Not illegal

b) Were not sold in the US because they would never pass US safety requirements

c) Can be legally imported and registered after the mandatory 25 year period

d) Are being legally imported and not destroying the market for new trucks in any meaningful way
Vero Scribe is hiring an Applied AI Engineer (Remote, Full-time, Toronto) | https://veroscribe.com

We’re a fast-growing startup building an AI-powered medical scribe to streamline clinical documentation and reduce administrative burden for healthcare providers. If you’re passionate about applying cutting-edge AI to make a real-world impact, we’d love to hear from you.

What we’re looking for:

- Experience with NLP, LLMs, or other AI-driven technologies

- Proficiency in Python and ML frameworks (e.g., TensorFlow, PyTorch)

- Strong problem-solving skills and a product-driven mindset

- Previous work with speech-to-text models or healthcare applications is a plus!

Let’s build the future of healthcare together!
Musk Vaulted to the Top of Diablo IV
How much do LLMs speed up development of drivers? Could it do it by itself?
thats crazy.
Ask HN: AI to Teach Topics
What are the best general products (i.e. you ask for the topic and it teaches vs. specialized) that can teach you about a topic using AI
Why Does "AI" "Art" Suck So Much? [video]
AGI Is the New AI
I'm not sure what you mean with "an exponentially-complex primitive". In my opinion, Prolog lets you start with simple relations (n-squared, using your terms) and then enables you to build more complex relations using them.
Came from ERP development and now I am in webdev.
>I guarantee that only about one in five male clubbers were truly "only there for the music". Maybe fewer than that.

Clubs aren't really raves though. Yes, most single people going to clubs are looking to hook up - all a "club" really is, is a bar with a DJ. A real rave typically doesn't even sell alcohol. But I'd wager that most single people going to actual raves (in warehouses or outdoors) are either too high to even think about hooking up, or really are there for the music and to dance - at least through the 1990's and early 2000s. I'm in the latter group, I'm a guy who went to raves (in warehouses and outdoors) for the music, as did everyone else I knew. Nobody was trying to hook up, it was definitely about getting our dance on.
That's for a few reasons.

999 good or OK outcomes and 1 bad one can still be overall pretty damn bad, when scaled up to the level of a society. It becomes a Something Must Be Done scenario pretty quick.

And I suspect in this specific case, the ratio of bad experiences.. maybe not terrible, but just bad.. was a lot higher than 1 in 1000.

I mean, the flip side of that is, going home with a stranger in a big city is pretty much a total historical anomaly before the 60s sexual revolution (because of smaller communities as well as more conservative sexual attitudes), maybe some of it is just the pendulum swinging back.
The article was written in 2019. Since then, it seems Americans' need for whimsical cowboy costumes has gotten even worse.
Power is somewhat binary - either you've got it or you don't. Ranked choice doesn't change that. The advantage of ranked choice voting is it allows people to be more expressive in signalling who they want to be in power.

And if N coalitions playing tug-of-war, that means there is an (N-1)/N chance that your preferred one loses. It is much better if everyone agrees not to play that game and adopts smarter strategy. Which has little to do with the number of people participating in the election.
Maybe cell phone cameras killed the rave.

Nobody wants pics of them dancing like a spastic monkey
Or idiomatic COBOL!
You would probably find "A Unified Differentiable Boolean Operator with Fuzzy Logic" interesting!

https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10954

They build up CSG trees with differentiable leafs (quadrics) combined with differentiable boolean-ish operations, so you can hill-climb over the entire shape.
I’ve been impressed with even applying sonnet to SVGs for animations. This looks like it could be a lot more powerful.

Fun example: https://gist.github.com/scosman/701275e737331aaab6a2acf74a52...
I'm interested in the actual details here --

1) What are the requirements for the mark? E.g. no passwords stored in plaintext on servers, no blank/default passwords on devices for SSH or anything else, a process for security updates, etc.?

2) Who is inspecting the code, both server-side and device-side?

3) What are the processes for inspecting the code? How do we know it's actually being done and not just being rubber-stamped? After all, discovering that there's an accidental open port with a default password isn't easy.
The key property being that everything can only be accessed via handles, including, recursively, other handles (i.e. to get an handle to an object you need first to already have an handle to the handle-giver for that object).