skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_a_Constructive_T...

CFACT is a member organization of the Cooler Heads Coalition, which rejects climate science, is known to promote falsehoods about climate change and has been characterized as a leader in efforts to stop the government from addressing climate change. CFACT chapters have protested in defense of oil exploration and in opposition to the Kyoto Protocol. CFACT supports drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as well as hydraulic fracturing (fracking) in natural gas and oil-rich regions of the country.
Good pointer! I did know about CVXPY but haven't used it yet. Though in requiring everything to be (log-)convex it constrains the user programs quite a bit, but I imagine it would have worked in this case because the objective is linear and the feasible set convex. I won't deny the role accident and force of habit had in picking this particular implementation path; I used Pytorch because it's my daily driver :D and because I had found 'mctorch' which provided the Riemann SGD logic.
It's been ages since I bothered answering stuff there. It just got really hard to find stuff that I can answer that still needs answering. The signal to noise ratio is terrible. And at the same time when I ask a question, I rarely get good answers. Or any answers. A lot of the people capable of answering simply aren't there any more.

The community quality went down, it seems and this kind of confirms that. It's also much less useful in dealing with weird errors. I end up on Github issues more often than on stack overflow these days. And Google redirecting me to a decade old stack overflow topic on issues with current versions of things that are new is just not helpful. The vast majority of stuff on e.g. gradle is so out of date that most of the solutions stopped working years ago. This is a gradle issue btw. It has poor documentation, and they keep changing things in compatibility breaking ways.

Just a few days ago I had a JVM crash. The error message landed me to a github issue describing the exact issue I had; including a helpful work around. Something related to netty and alpine's libc implementation. Problem solved. That used to be where stackoverflow was the goto solution. Not anymore. It had nothing to offer here. Nobody asked. Nobody answered. Or maybe they did and their SEO sucks. I don't know. But it's a pattern I noticed in recent years where it's just not that helpful anymore and things like github issues are actually a better place to get helpful answers from experts using and producing the software. I actually leave comments there too when I think I can add value.

Stackoverflow is no longer the best place for that level of support.
The combined requirements of govt purchasing must carry the mark and major US surveillance tech manufacturers like Amazon are leading the rollout, makes this seem less like a cybersecurity concern and more of a protectionist carve out.
It’s not PIC and not really suitable for complex diagrams, yet, but you can use Vizzlo’s Chart Vizzard to create a subset of the supported chart types (let’s say a Gantt) and then continue editing it using the chart editor: https://vizzlo.com/ai
I believe it was Knitlord but Bamboo Cool seems to be another good brand, at least on Amazon.
Activation space interpretability may be doomed
If you don't want to get a controller then I'd recommend fooling around with a sequencer instead.
Yes exactly feels great.
You have to have rules before you can enforce them...

It looks like part of the label [1] will include a QR or link to a public registry, so in theory you can easily confirm the device has actually been certified.

[1] https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-23-65A1.pdf point 42
These should be re-using the same CPU chiplets from the desktop and server products, so it'll be the full-sized Zen 5 cores.
Anything that relies on booze is dying. It’s too expensive.
You might be interesting in looking at the Lima programming language: http://btetrud.com/Lima/Lima-Documentation.html . It has ideas that cover some of these things. For example, it's intended to operate with fully automatic optimization. This assumption allows shedding lots of complexity that arises from needing to do the same logical thing in multiple ways that differ in their physical efficiency characteristics. Like instead of having 1000 different tree classes, you have 1 and optimisers can then look at your code and decide what available tree structures make most sense in each place. Related to your async functions idea, it does provide some convenient ways of handling these things. While functions are just normal functions, it has a very easy way to make a block of async (using "thread") and provides means of capturing async errors that result from that.
Almost like ecstasy and cocaine/alcohol mix have different effects on the human brain and body...
Shouldn't there be some apocalyptic, end-of-the-world conspiracy theory to go along with this? I'm almost disappointed.
You know this same story has been posted on this place for at least 2 years? Every time (since the first couple at least) it gets flagged, called a dupe, and people in the comments wring their hands about WHY that is.

What's the interesting conversation that's supposed to emerge from this? "I believe her." "I don't." is about the limit. There's no new info other than a suit being filed, there's a ton of heat, but almost no light.

So people flag it, then other people act like there's a conspiracy to flag it.
The risks are called living your life – there is a inherent risk with traveling, hiking, wandering around as a kid, and almost any activity outside of staring at a screen.
> Some Lisps may be able to do all this, although I don’t know if they quite do what I’m talking about here; I’m talking about there being a very distinct point where the programmer says “OK, I’m done being dynamic” for any given piece of code.

In Common Lisp there are tricks you can pull like declaring functions in a lexical scope (using labels or flet) to remove their lookup overhead. But CL is generally fast enough that it doesn't really matter much.
Censorship Is Complicated: What Internet History Says about Meta/Facebook
Rump kernel/anykernel is the concept. The drivers can run in user space with minimal underlying support.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rump_kernel
TabPFN: Accurate predictions on small data with a tabular foundation model
A couple of weeks ago I learnt that Bash on Mac does not have associative arrays. We worked around the issue by changing the script to run under Zsh, but beware.
Just to note this is from the perspective of him reiterating the thought in 2019.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/21810-it-is-difficult-to-ge...
I'd happily hit the dance floor sober for years. But now it's too loud and I like my sleep :-). I also don't feel the music like I used to either, but damn it was good.
I just had a chat with neom and he helped me a lot with going deep into personas - channels - message. A helpful dude, if anyone thinks about reaching out to him, then from my experience it sounds like a good idea
No, we are not in fact 5 years from breaking RSA-2048.
That’s why I said you need to have a distinct value add. If you’re a generic X-level engineer, going to be harder to stand out.
What's with the line "the Vegas shooting perpetrated by an FBI sniper"?

What is the author suggesting?
I understand your confusion and dismay over React because I'm myself a backend developer and the kind of complexity doesn't exist in backend tech stack.

But this all or none of it has anything to do with React rather with a broken language design which never imagined anyone would write JavaScript worth more than a few paragraphs in a single file.

That's where tons of bundlers come into play from parcel and webpack to vite.

But then there are some language extensions that must be transpiled before they can be bundled. Your JSX comes to mind.

Typescript can be considered in the same league.

Minus all that - Modern React has a very minimal surface area, very few concepts and that's about it.
> In general, the left seeks social justice through redistributive social and economic policies, while the right defends private property and capitalism.

That’s an extremely left-skewed framing that leaves out a lot of important cultural issues. For instance, the leftists during the Spanish Civil War massacred Catholic priests and nuns and burned down churches while many on the right sought to protect the church and restore the Spanish monarchy.

It’s more correct to say that the right defends traditional institutions, which might include capitalism, but even these vary widely from country to country. For instance the United States never had a monarchy or an established religion; most of the American Founding Fathers would have sat somewhere left of center in the Estates General during the French Revolution, which is where we get the terms “left” and “right” from in the first place. But in an American context, the republic and the constitution are the traditional institutions that the American right has traditionally defended, even though they were established by the 18th century left.

Even when it comes to capitalism it’s not as clear cut. Prior to the American Civil War, the north was capitalist but the south had a precapitalist agrarian economy based on slave labor. The northern liberals, abolitionists, and capitalists formed a coalition to the left of the southern planters. Outside of areas that had widespread slavery, there’s also a long tradition of right wing critiques of capitalism as a destructive change to the traditional patterns of society, and there are many on the far right who seek to return to much older ways that are now lost.
The MUMPS database is wild. When I was working in MUMPS, it was so easy and fun to whip up an internal tool to share with my coworkers. You don't have to give any special thought at all to persistence, so you're able to stay in the flow of thinking about your business logic.

But as you said, the language itself is almost unbearable to use.
Backdooring Your Backdoors – Another $20 Domain, More Governments
I'm sure Amazon - whose store is mostly generic Chinese schlock nowadays - will check.

Not that it matters, posters on this very site who claim to care will continue buying stuff off AliExpress, proud they got it for pennies on the dollar.

Look ma, a mini PC for $22! And they didn't even charge for the preinstalled malware!

Has anyone ever considered this junk is sold at a loss as a price of doing business, to expand a PRC-controlled botnet?
Why would you like to have this language? Is it about control over the execution? About better ways to personally optimize? Or just intellectual pleasure? Or is it about reliving the olden days of assembly language programming but with a modern conveniences?
They did take econ 101. They simply know whose interests they serve: people who already own property.
I have about 200k rep and a 15 years account.

When I want to ask a question I need to bend backwards in order for the "community" not to downvote and tell me that I need X when I ask Y.

Some communities (hello Golang!) are straight toxic telling that if you do not ask a IQ 150 question, get out. I do not think I have question with a positive vote there.

In contrast, when asking on Travel or Cooking I get friendly, reasonable answers. I read the TeX community just because they are so nice (I do not even use TeX or LaTeX :))

I usually get an answer on Reddit, though the quality varies.

I need to use ChatGPT more as it seems to be the short and mid-term future
People might be assuming that 2048-bits is only twice as strong as 1024-bits, but it's in fact a billion times better. (corrected, thanks!)
I am not sure that the death of one person outweighs the lifelong ptsd of 100% of fb content moderators. Again, my original claim is that it is not obvious.

I am not trying to trivialize this persons death. If it were up to me, I'd completely get rid of social media in an instant.
Oh totally! My aim is to avoid leetcode as a 10y+ developer with real track record delivering $XM projects. To me it is a game breaker to have to study up on leetcode problems, as it keeps me from juggling multiple interview in the pipeline.

Every network job I've gotten (two) has been a walk on interview, I'm fine with this as long as I don't have to do circus problems.
I just think people who say this are very funny and weird. I took an econ 101 class, but drawing supply demand curves to talk about wide ranging governmental policy is just a bad methodology.
In general, the rates of incest are significantly underestimated. I have seen this anecdotally with the individuals myself and friends have dated, along with volunteering for sometime with CPS here in Texas.

It is unreported for obvious reasons, and few realize how easy it is to get away with. Families have lived in close quarters for a long time, and the opportunity is great for sexual gratification with another. Siblings often live in the same room. There are significant power dynamics at play when one sibling is 3 and the other is say 11. Yet there aren't the restraining forces of maturity on the 11 year old.

Sadly, the incest movement was probably set back 20 years due to its association with Satanic Ritual Abuse in the late 1980's and 1990's.

For those looking on help with this, I highly recommend the book "Courage to Heal" by Ellen Bass [1].

A sign of progress is that in the latest editions of the book, it also focuses on men. The early editions only focused on women.

[1] - https://www.amazon.com/Courage-Heal-Survivors-Sexual-Anniver...
Not with the way it is taught. But if the course structure is changed slightly to have reinforcement of early concepts woven through the course, people learn much better.

At least that was my experience when I taught it. See https://bentilly.blogspot.com/2009/09/teaching-linear-algebr... for more detail on my experience.
Ultimately you'll still need to further process it into a set of physical step by step instructions for the instrument. I'd still rather have the slicer be separate software step so you can tweak the physical properties of the process -wall thickness, infill, temperature and speed, etc. But yeah, it should be possible to input an implicit representation into a slicer.
Old but still relevant: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/09/the_doghouse_...

These numbers have nothing to do with the technology of the devices; they are the maximums that thermodynamics will allow. And they strongly imply that brute-force attacks against 256-bit keys will be infeasible until computers are built from something other than matter and occupy something other than space.

Long story short, brute forcing AES256 or RSA4096 is physically impossible
Just refactor SerenityOS, take its DE and make it a Wayland compositor, stop reinventing the wheel. Ladybird realized this, why can't SerenityOS do the same?
Madison is exceptional for a midwestern city. It has a large and excellent state university. Epic is based there and most of FAANG has outposts there to draw the CS talent. Additionally, it is the state capitol which means a lot of companies providing services to the state. Aside from all that, it is a pretty picturesque location for the Midwest, with the two big lakes and surrounded by rolling hills. Something you won't find in Urbana-Champaign for comparison.

When people talk about low cost of living in the Midwest they generally mean more depressed areas. I live in a very low cost of living rural (15k ppl) community in Illinois, with half an acre on a lake in a 3000 sq foot house where the mortgage is only 250k. Of course, if I ever lose my remote job, I'd never be able to find work. Most of the people here work at one of 2 medium-sized factories or the hospital. The median household income is only $40k.

The town I live in is a far more common case for the rural Midwest.
Many organizations block IPs from places such as AWS, Azure, Tor and where it is trivial to get new addresses.

It's a great tactic for webcrawling but if you ever get caught they'll block those netblocks and nobody will get away with it again. (Try editing Wikipedia from Tor and see what happens.) I've been on both sides of that one.
Sometimes things I post get flagged by users and I get it, fair enough. This time I can only think of malicious reasons.

The only people who I can imagine flagging this post are Meta PR, or users who are bringing their politics into a non-political post. If anyone has any other reasonable explanations, I would love to hear them.

Looks like the title was edited, original title: Facebook Is Censoring 404 Media Stories About Facebook's Censorship
Some can't detect humour and sarcasm.
Some quantitative differences are so big that they are qualitative.

There is a qualitative difference between "You can walk around and people-watch with your own two eyes" and "You can collect data on thousands of people from all across any major city with thousands of machine eyes"

The law is simply out of date. There should be an expectation of privacy from surveillance.
The only appeal clubs ever really had to me was picking up women, which is irrelevant now since I'm married. Since I'm nothing terribly special in the looks department [1], and I really don't enjoy any kind of dancing, all I ever had going for me was being "kind of funny", which didn't really work in clubs.

I tend to make jokes when I'm nervous, so the awkwardness wasn't really a problem for doing that, but it wouldn't work if the jokes are inaudible.

It doesn't help that I have never really felt comfortably being physically close to strangers. I'll put up with it on the subway, but that's a purely utilitarian thing. I suspect alcohol would help with that, but I don't drink anymore (and never drank that much).

I certainly don't want to diminish your enjoyment for this, I'm just saying that every time I've gone to a club it's the worst moment of my life. I absolutely hate everything about it.

[1] This isn't meant as self-deprecating or fishing for compliments, I'm perfectly happy with my body. I just acknowledge that I was probably never going to be a male model.
It's not quality they're sacrificing. SerenityOS is built on the idea of rejecting anything "not invented here". Basically it's from-scratch on purpose. Ladybird by contrast actually has the goal of being a real usable viable independent browser. So they're removing a lot of the home-grown Serenity stuff and replacing with open source libs. For instance they just removed the their home-grown SSL implementation and replaced it with OpenSSL. Likewise with their graphics layer they adopted a mature backend which now supports WebGL as a results. Ladybird's network stack is based on Curl these days I believe. It's about using solid public open source libraries as the foundation instead of having to be experts in every niche part.
Earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42630197
Ah gotcha. I misread and agree completely with what you state. That does appear (to me anyway) exactly what happened.
The linked example of the author's "high quality" question that got closed as a duplicate is in fact a duplicate of the existing question, and doesn't seem like a very good question-as-documentation due to being significantly emotionally charged.

The author seems to have been offended by not being lavished with praise for asking such a good question or something.
Uh... given the beauty of relational algebra I don't understand how we ended up with the ugly mess of sql.
Because not everything is about practicality or profit.
There is no supply restriction. We're close to the record-high number of housing units per capita, it's only a bit lower than in 2007, and we're likely to surpass it by 2026.
I find infinitesimals more intuitive than the formal 'limits-based' approach. I'm currently studying my old degree material but using a fairly interesting book:

"Full Frontal Calculus: An Infinitesimal Approach" by Seth Braver.

I like his readable style. His poetic intro finally gave me an intuition why infinitesimals might be useful, compared to the good old reals:

"Yet, by developing a "calculus of infinitesimals" (as it was known for two centuries), mathematicians got great insight into `real` functions, breaking through the static algebraic ice shelf to reach a flowing world of motion below, changing and evolving in time."
Code Like a Journalist: Data analysis and visualization course using TypeScript
The fascinating thing about accessibility is that (unlike many other characteristics) all of us are going to be at least temporarily disabled at some point in our lives. I've really appreciated the presence of ramps whenever I've injured my foot, or just if I'm rolling a couple heavy suitcases.
I believe this is a fantastic idea, even if only because I literally was ideating on the same lines just last week.

I think there were some usability issues, but overall, solid stuff.

I think if I were you, I would focus on the UX of legislative bill analysis rather than the LLM side of it, but that's just me.
That would be a counter-counterexample, wouldn't it?
I like Glider. It's just text and easy to navigate through comments
The internet has actively _boosted_ real-estate prices. Real estate prices were suppressed pre-internet because transaction costs were high and there was nearly zero utility of an unoccupied space.

Airbnb, easy and cheap travel, remote work, property management firms, remote surveillance and access control, etc. And also declining household sizes (many more people living alone) which is seemingly a result of internet/social media/mobile devices.
Happy to talk more about this if you're interested. I have a lot of ideas around this. And see this kind of setup as really important, and benefitial.
They describe it as being like EnergyStar which suggests they'll have a consumer accessible registry as described here:

https://www.ul.com/news/ul-solutions-named-lead-administrato...

> UL Solutions will also work with the FCC and program stakeholders to develop a national registry of certified products that consumers can access via QR code on the label. The registry will have more detailed information about each product. Additionally, UL Solutions will serve as liaison between the FCC and other CLAs, as well as other key stakeholders. [emphasis added]

and here:

https://www.fcc.gov/CyberTrustMark

> The logo will be accompanied by a QR code that consumers can scan, linking to a registry of information with easy-to-understand details about the security of the product, such as the support period for the product and whether software patches and security updates are automatic.

This doesn't block full-blown counterfeit products (recreating certified devices including the label), but does address non-compliant devices trying to pose as compliant.
A little undermined by the fat finger within the first 10 seconds.
Having interacted with many people who don’t engage with any kind of political media, this isn’t true. It’s very difficult to have any clue what to vote for or why when you have no information; these people end up going off vibes. Spending all day listening to choir preaching may still diffuse useful information about current issues into you by accident.
I think the replies to this post may be missing the point? AIUI The raspi CPU drivers being closed makes it actually pretty hard to write an open driver for it. So you would need raspberry pi or their CPU supplier to write the driver for you, which they wouldn't do for a small OS. It took multiple years to support raspi 4 in mainline Linux and AFAIK raspi 5 still does not have a fully functioning mainline driver. That's why Raspberry Pi OS exists. You would pick a CPU that has open drivers because it would be easier to write your own for a different operating system.