skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Honestly, they are just playing the rulebook of "lets not get into regulartory waters". The reality is that no one on either side really gives a shit that much, as proven by recent elections.
I wonder how many “outraged” about Luigi killing are also outraged at the capital punishment that gets celebrated by a large fucking portion of Americans.
They ad up though. How many DUI murders are equivalent to a single premeditated murder?

But yeah, people in these positions rarely need or want to directly kill someone, they have other means to achieve their goals.

Yet many financial or other white collar crimes are usually never prosecuted or result in a slap on the wrist.

Obviously they are not the same as murder but still the impact ads up. Defrauding or ruining thousands of people or crashing the global economy is not that far off.

Then you have police officers regularly getting away with outright murder and facing no consequences (of course that’s a different class)
> In the end, he found the web browser more interesting than the OS it was created for.

To be fair, his career was heavily focused on browser development before he ended up in a period of unemployment (I can't recall the exact circumstances), at which point he developed SerenityOS as a means of meditation/to give him purpose.

He still works on the OS, he's just more fulfilled working in a realm he specializes in and has pivoted focus there.

You can follow his monthly SerenityOS YouTube updates leading up to the Ladybird announcement for a more detailed rundown.
> It is rare for someone to deliberately break the law and also be ethically upright

Strawman. Your goal is to prove that there is full alignment between ethics and law in our current system. If there isn't, then we cannot use one's adherence to the law as an indicator of their ethical standing.

The Holocaust was legal once. Harboring Jewish political refugees was not.

The Palestinian genocide is legal now (according to the US, not the ICC). Speaking out about it at univerities is met with extreme police action.

Slavery used to be widespread in the West, and freeing/harboring escaped slaves would land you in prison or a grave.

> The justice system generally doesn't tolerate revenge

That's an idealistic take. The reality is that the justice system is frequently used to make examples out of political dissidents.

This has been true for millennia. My patron saint, Joan of Arc, was burned to the stake for essentially wearing pants. Are you going to sit here and try to tell me that burning a 17 year old at the stake for not being "womanlike" is ethical?
> It is when the care is necessary

So when the insurance denies coverage, and so the doctors don't work for free on the case, and the patient dies, are the doctors perpetrating violence too?
so because the science was reported sloppily, we can't trust science - instead of educating people?
Quarries have been outsourced. China killed the rave.
Wall Street Expected to Shed 200k Jobs as AI Erodes Roles
“ Antiferromagnets could be incorporated into future memory chips that store and process more data while using less energy”

“using a terahertz laser”

#doubt
Oh yeah, speaking of rights...

"Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control."

- https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-huma...
> I think we've effectively already done that.

You definitely haven't. Lots of Americans would be deeply unhappy if single payer healthcare were implemented tomorrow. Say what you will about whether they should be convinced, but they haven't been.
Stacksocial originated that style of selling discounted licenses I think. Been using them for years also
A few years ago, I remember when the Olympics was hosted in Vancouver, BC. The news reported that an insane amount of free condoms was distributed to the athletes. Some lower level athletes were interviewed, and they said they knew they had zero chance of a medal, but were having the time of their lives.
Don't mistake public support for memes.

This is the reason why Kamala was predicted to win. In reality, the "I don't care which candidate is in the office" was the top choice this recent election.
Hotter in California perhaps, but far more humid in the Midwest.

85F / 90% humidity is probably more taxing than 100F / 30% RH.
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences (1959) [pdf]
The overrated clubs in Berlin are overrated, but there are also all the other clubs that no NY Times ever writes about. There are (still) many of them and they are good.
I’m new to the forum and super excited to join this community to learn and get inspired. I’ve recently started thinking seriously about achieving financial independence, but I’m feeling a bit overwhelmed about where to start. Currently, I have around $5,000 in savings, but I’m unsure how to allocate it. Should I focus on paying off a small credit card balance ($1,200), building an emergency fund, or investing in something like ETFs? My ultimate goal is to save enough to live off passive income within the next 10-15 years. Here are a few things I’ve been considering:

Is it better to focus solely on debt elimination before starting to invest?
Should I prioritize building a larger emergency fund first?
For beginners, what investment strategies have worked for you?
> Not "be skeptical, verify, repeat, etc.", but "trust"...

that's because you don't have the skills for it. you can't even deal with poor reporting, but you want to verify/repeat?

did you also let your kids operate the oven before they could walk?
Not quite true. Worked at epic previously. Due to the culmination of a 10 year migration from VB to electron, the os level input buffer was discarded mid 2023 since electron doesn’t handle those the same way. The primary reason for this is that VB was pretty much synchronous. However, web technologies don’t act the same way because keeping your keyboard inout while navigating to a different site would be weird.

We added an input handler to queue inputs so that sequences of shortcuts and keypresses could be used.

Additionally, the internal framework we had allowed for shortcuts and we tried to replicate as much as could shortcut wise (as well as functionality wise). Almost everything should have a shortcut or a way to navigate to it via just keyboard — they had put in a lot of effort to ensure accessibility so that they could get the va contract that went to cerner(pre-oracle acquisition)
Of course, people, whether criminals or not, should be attributed for their intellectual contributions but there is a bigger point here which people do not say enough:

The criminal justice system already wields the responsibility of punishing criminals. Let the convicts go through due process and do their time. The rest of the society should not participate in "delivering justice": obviously not by hitting them or torturing them, but also not by taking away their property or social capital.
Overall more hours awake. 7×8 < 6×9
Stack Overflow's rules for bounties [0] discourage promotional bounties but do not state that bounties cannot be given to the same user or on the basis of the user as opposed to a user's answers.

Stack Overflow failed to enunciate their own rules (or - let's be honest - imagined new rules after the fact), blamed you for breaking non-existent rules, sent you an obviously mostly copy/paste suspension notice (the bit about secondary accounts seems bizarre and non sequitur), and gas-lit you with the imaginary claim that you cannot vote on a post you already voted on which for whatever reason hadn't been logged.

FWIW also a high-rep SO user and had to create a burner account in case there's retribution. We shouldn't have to hide ourselves just to talk sanely.

SO is right to try to protect the bounty system from unintended uses, but not to make rules up on the fly and enforce them heavy-handedly and retrospectively, suspending someone for breaking non-existent rules.

Stack Overflow should make rules for bounties and make them crystal clear and unsuspend you. Can they admit they're wrong - will they do this? Of course not.

[0] https://stackoverflow.com/help/bounty#:~:text=Users%20may%20....
Windows Enterprise edition has been subscription-only licensing for several years. The lowest edition cost is about twice that of Professional over a five year period.
University is definitely not a place where you are free to learn whatever you want, unless you already have all your credit points.
Here are requirements if you follow the China-bad politics:

1) Don’t be select Chinese products

2) Be select American products

It’s not reaaaally 3d chess, but a relatively crude misnomer for the “Made in America” stamp or “Its American and definitely not Chinese”.

The security practices are probably the same across products, it’s just the wrong time wrong presidency for China.
That's true if the only alternative to hooking up with randoms in a bar is staying home.

Same as, until the Jet Age, the only alternative to risky world travel by land and sea was to stay home.. and then we invented jet airliners, which made travel multiple orders of magnitude safer than the Age of Sail.

I'm a neutral observer on this tbh, never had anything against bar culture at the time, but if you were a 19yr old weighing up your options today, online dating looks like the same potential reward without all sorts of down sides. Not just the personal safety stuff, but as a guy not having to run the gauntlet of approaching women and getting shot down (no big deal really, but cultural shifts now frown upon asking at all, whereas it used to be more a case of.. ask away, the important thing was to respect it if you got told no).

The flip side is that online dating results in a much more publicly conservative culture, where even merely flirting is at risk of being reframed as sexual misconduct, people have thinner skins and lower tolerance generally because they've never had to develop a thick skin, it takes some of the beautiful chaos out of the world.. people didn't go about the place constantly looking to hook up (well, maybe some did) but the very possibility added something to the atmosphere, even if the probability was low.

And on the subject of beautiful chaos. Take a look at video footage from major rock, pop and dance concerts/festivals from 2000 ish and today. Watch the crowds, look at their facial expressions, energy level, state of mind.

Something is up with that, right?
> was a cog in the wheel who was doing his job

A little Eichmann is still an Eichmann
> It is rare for someone to deliberately break the law and also be ethically upright.

I’m laughing from the back of the bus on this one. I mean if I sat in the front that might not be allowed, it might be breaking the law. OMG.
If zem and I were in a room by ourselves, I don't think either of us would try to be "boss". Only once someone who supports such power structures, such as yourself, enters the picture, do we have to start protecting ourselves against such people. Have you read Lord of the Flies?
> It is hard to feel sorry when...

I don't need to feel sorry for anyone to assert that murder is wrong. Morals (and laws) don't depend on how sympathetic the victim is or isn't. The fact that there's a sizable chunk of American society which doesn't see this is scary as hell, and speaks very poorly of those people.
It's not like the Punisher isn't popular.

Let's be real: the original super heroes avoided killing because children were their target market, and unlike with cowboys and outlaws or indians, it would have been unseemly by the standards of the time. Not because of some kind of big point about "just vigilantism."
Popular in:

2019 (113 points, 70 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19588971

2017 (112 points, 29 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13954804

2014 (66 points, 46 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8520610

Submitted >20 times, as recent as 8 days ago
For people out of the loop like me (the article doesn’t mention it): Luigi Mangione is an American man who was identified as the suspect in the killing of Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare.
CIA officer Allen Lawrence Pope flew a B-26 bomber targeting civilian merchant vessels in Indonesia as part of an operation to overthrow the Indonesian president by weakening the economy and inspiring local discontent. He personally claimed to have "enjoyed killing Communists". His plane was shot down, and he was eventually returned to the US, where he continued to fly planes for the CIA.

Does this count? Or is the government allowed to indiscriminately kill civilians whenever and wherever they feel like it?
I guess so. I hope your sister is doing alright. Nobody wanted to insure properties in Orange or Anaheim Hills for me either, only option was to get calfair policy. We ended up buying in Aliso Viejo.
People die when they’re denied affordable healthcare. They see their loved ones be treated like shit by insurance companies. Its another form of extreme injustice to those who experience it, similar to war and civil rights.
Ah, since it said it was a library I thought the bindings were something extra. That makes sense though.
> I don't think children who can't solve their disagreements without violence should be listened to

Have you ever heard of these things?

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duel

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War

Seems like the victor in the later gets a lot of people to listen to them.

> It's not "edgy", Daria.

Clearly they should rely on the very mature practice of name calling instead.
I don't think you read the data in article you quoted.
You can't go like that: "he doesn't have support", "here's evidence of support", "that doesn't count".

Claiming someone has support is the ad populum falacy, you can argue that. But don't dismiss data because it doesn't support you.
The person you are responding to seems like a hall monitor that might have reported “the coloreds” for using the “wrong” water fountain 60 years ago.
I know more older adults who just avoid the topic than say it was truly wrong.
Thank you! I had no idea. By the way, the post definitely isn't AI—whether it's 'slop' is a matter of opinion, of course.
It's funny you mentioned "deterministic Playwright code," because in my experience, that’s one of the most frustrating challenges of writing integration tests with browser automation tools. Authoring tests is relatively easy, but creating reliable, deterministic tests is much harder.

Most of my test failures come down to timing issues—CPU load subtly affects execution, leading to random timeouts. This makes it difficult to run tests both quickly and consistently. While proactive load-testing of the test environment and introducing artificial random delays during test authoring can help, these steps often end up taking more time than writing the tests themselves.

It would be amazing if tools were smart enough to detect these false positives automatically. After all, if a human can spot them, shouldn’t AI be able to as well?
Sure, if you diminish and demean absolutely everyone who disagrees with you, then you're left in a bubble where your truth is the only obvious correct one.

I know old white guys who are the same way. The craziest thing is how "open-minded" they imagine themselves to be!
Popular in:

2022 (146 points, 30 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32406883

2019 (125 points, 29 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21462190

~2015 (48 points, 18 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10794026

2013 (217 points, 84 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6871202
I'm going to quote it right here so it is clear what you're describing.

"Americans are twice as likely to view Luigi Mangione — who was charged with the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson — very or somewhat unfavorably (43%) than favorably (23%).

But adults under 30 are more likely to view Mangione favorably than unfavorably (39% to 30%). Those between the ages of 30 and 44 are evenly divided (28% to 29%)
Liberals are much more likely to view Mangione favorably than are conservatives"

One in four is not "extremely limited". The age group where unfavourable wins clearly is 44+.

This poll report also suffers from the US brain worm that calls everything but the far right "liberal". It's likely most of those that see Mangione's direct action favourably are actually leftists, and some fascists of the kind that follow Ben Shapiro and commented negatively about his coverage.

The US healthcare profiteers have killed many more people than Mangione, likely thousands, since he killed Thompson.
It depends. If you need basic word processing, spreadsheets, presentations, and email, you can definitely get by with alternatives. If you want more advanced functionality, you’re more likely to run into limitations or just things that work differently than what you might be used to. Microsoft 365 is not better in every way, but it’s a strong contender.

I suspect the familiarity and compatibility probably cinches it for a lot of people. Honestly, the convenience and familiarity are valuable, even if you and I would prefer open source options were more popular.
> What people actually want does not impact the way in which our government functions, despite popular belief.

The US just elected a president despite a years-long coordinated media and legal effort to make him disappear, along with multiple assassination attempts. So, yes, what the people want does actually matter. They just don't happen to want what you think they should want.
Well I suspect the lethality of said justice in this case is quite critical to the judgment of being _objectively_ wrong.
> There's always a slight chance of arsonists.

Actually, that was my first natural reaction. (Though I do live in the neighborhood of Russia, here probability of foul play is much higher up the list)

> Sometimes they're firefighters, too.

That is messed up.
> People cant do what they want. What planet are you on?

A planet where I can try to do anything I want, only stopped if what I am doing is being prevented by someone physically stopping me, such as an officer or concerned citizen. As per my post.

> The only reason "evolution" is thrown around is bc of natural selection. To use evolution as a term is to imply it.

https://ncse.ngo/defining-evolution

> Initially, the Latin word evolutio meant the unrolling of a scroll

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evolution

> 2a: a process of change in a certain direction (unfolding)

Your claims are easily falsifiable. The modern use of "evolution" in biology evolved after the word was already in use to mean change. You have no authority to police the use of the word.
What is "resource availability"? In a non-profit healthcare systems, how exactly the amount of available resources is determined? Is there no person involved making a decision that causes the amount of available resources to change? Think about it. Consider, for example, politicians who set the healthcare tax rate. If they set it 1% higher, there will be more resources available. Does it mean that by not doing so, they deny care to some?

I strongly encourage you to think very carefully about this. Once you do, you'll find that there are no simple answers: you'll always have limited resources, and you'll always have to deny care to some people, and in fact it will always include some people personally making the call to deny care to some people. Any system that actually exists, public or private, does this.
She cut some 2% of the LA fire department budget, 17M out of 837M. The outrage is politically fueled more than any rationale reasoning.
In maps: acres on fire in LA
Ding ding. This and a lot of the sensation news pieces that came out a few years before, across the nation, that attracted more people for the wrong reasons that prompted things like challenging the local authorities and resulted in the RAVEact
Supawork's *AI kissing video generator* transforms static images into romantic, lifelike kiss animations effortlessly. Perfect for anyone seeking to create captivating videos for personal or creative projects, it combines advanced AI with user-friendly features to deliver professional-quality results.

*User-Friendly Interface*
Supawork's AI kissing video generator offers a simple and intuitive platform that anyone can navigate. With no technical expertise required, users can easily turn their photos into seamless kiss videos in just a few clicks.

*Free*
This tool is free to trial for users. Whether for personal memories or creative purposes, Supawork makes high-quality kiss videos accessible to everyone.

*No Sign-Up Required*
Start using the AI kissing video generator instantly—no account creation needed. The streamlined process saves time and gets you started right away.

*Customizable Options*
Users can personalize their kiss videos by adding stunning background scines, and tweaking details to match your creative vision. This flexibility ensures every video is unique.

*High-Quality Output*
Supawork delivers HD-quality videos with smooth and realistic effects. The AI-powered tool ensures lifelike animations that look professional and polished.

*Secure and Private*
Your data is handled securely, with all files deleted after processing. Supawork prioritizes user privacy, ensuring a safe and worry-free experience while using the AI kissing video generator.

Create unforgettable memories with Supawork AI kissing video generator—a free, customizable, and secure tool for transforming photos into lifelike kiss animations.
We should stop believing tech can and will solve every single of our problems.

Between climate change, poor forest maintenance, poor infrastructure maintenance, building in risk areas, &c. it's all a matter of time.
We're not gods and we will never be, we should have learned to live with our environment, not against it.
An edit amounting to "not like that" in the first 40 minutes after asking for examples. Grand.
Ah, so you want to be a lion? But I bet you don't want to be treated like an animal. So which is it? Are you an animal or are you human?
I assume it's because there is simply no need to rail against a murderer because the justice system will take care of that, so most of those against ignore the threads, and the few that put their heads up get down voted by the passionate supporters which further discourages any discussion.
Given how many fans some serial killers have, that may be the case. But I'd argue that's not what's really going on with Luigi.
What point does it defeat and why? I’m assuming that you’re talking about evolution here, where having your own kids rather than taking care of someone else’s have been adaptive, but that’s just like saying that the point of a large rock on a beach is to be so large as to not be swept into sea by the waves.

If you meant something else, please clarify!
> Things like denying healthcare, shutting down companies and laying off people to benefit private equity investors, forcing people into bankruptcy, losing their homes, charging overdraft fees, etc.

These things are objectively not violence. Violence isn't a word for "things that harm people", it very specifically means direct, purposeful physical harm. Don't distort the meaning of words for rhetorical flair.
Maybe there should be some ethical consideration of a culture of prizing American/German/Chinese/Russian mostly semi-pro and literally pro athletes stomping mostly real amateurs from the rest of the world in the olympiad.

They could all save a lot of money and it would probably be more interesting to watch.
There is a small handful of clinics in Japan that do not accept the universal health insurance, such as specialist ones targeting English-speaking expats.

Example: https://www.nmclinic.net/index.html#about