skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think this is all a bit like "here are the tools, this is a circle, now draw the rest of the owl".

Don't get me wrong, the docs are great. What I meant by that is that all the individual parts are well explained, but a framework is all about how you compose its parts — and that is described best by walking people through the thought-process of why to combine certain elements in a certain way and what behaviour you achieve by that as a result. Because in the end it is about the result.

A stellar example of this is Miguel Grinbergs Flask Mega-Tutorial: https://blog.miguelgrinberg.com/post/the-flask-mega-tutorial...

This bridges the gap between a good reference and a complex example project.
Giant Tiger has 900g go on sale for this price pretty regularly. Unfortunately it's only for penne, spaghetti, and sometimes macaroni, they don't seem to sell the other shapes in the 900g format.
It is an irate response. I guess when you read a 1000th "perfectly fine comment" it gets to you. I remember this site being full of interesting stuff, like really vibrant CS things, math for programmers, all kinds of new languages and frameworks and patterns and algorithms, but nowadays all of that diversity is eaten and shitted out as AI AI AI AI AI ... It's nauseating. I'm sorry I know this is a rant but damn, what the fuck happened :(
If we go back far enough the fatal error is the Wright brothers inventing the airplane.

It might be more useful to start with the solid concrete plane stopper and work backwards than work forwards from 1903.
Gift-wrapping an otherwise empty box with one of these could make for a fun gift.
Hmm I've never thought of any Olympic victory as being attributed in part to like, the current President, and I'd be surprised if anyone thought that would be the case. But it's not dubious that Americans (including myself) love to see our country winning things, and if we suddenly started tanking at the Olympics most of us would want our country to get our act together.

Of all the things the state does having national pride in competition does not seem nefarious to me. I also love it when we win the various math/science olympiads. Means our country is still a powerhouse across the board.
If the wheels drop off my car at 100km/h and I lose control and hit a wall, is the wall the cause of the accident?

The barrier was 250m away from the end of the runway, the extra 50m if following regulations wouldn’t have changed the outcome. And if the wall wasn’t there, the plane would dive right into a highway anyway. That’s the point.
Insightful observation study:

> We knew from studies in the 1950s comparing London bus drivers and London bus conductors that lived in the same environment, but one — they had the bus drivers who were sitting, the conductors were standing, and the heart disease rate among the drivers was twice that of the conductors.
Yes really. You’re just giving anecdotal evidence, which is fine, but the GP is still correct.

Here’s some counter anecdotal evidence: my high end sound card doesn’t work with Linux Mint. Half my motherboard’s USB ports are not recognised by Linux Mint. And my brand new Apple Studio Display only partially works with Linux Mint.

All works 100% on Windows.

I’d still recommend moving away from Windows, but you must be honest that Linux OS’s still have more problems with hardware (in general). And for novice users/tech-unsavvy peeps, the amount of terminal time is still far too high.

Personally, I was only holding on to Windows for music production. But the other day I logged into Windows 11 after not having used it for a while and - whatever update had installed - it started causing audio dropouts on my 64 core machine, 128gb ram, with nvme drives and pro sound card!

That was the last straw for me. I ordered the new M4 Mac Mini Pro, which I’ll use just for music production. And continue with Linux Mint on my PC for everything else.

I’ve used Windows in one form or another since 3.1, but the amount of crap they keep loading on my machine without my permission and the generally hostile approach to users: “Let’s keep setting up your machine. Yes | Maybe Later”, let’s not. Let’s never use Windows again.
How do you do that when you don't know the APIs? AI code assistants seem more useful when you're doing something outside your existing experience: different domain, different libraries, different language, etc.
I feel like they have a plan, get the backend up to scratch to appease the tech people and they're leaving the ways to interact with it purposely vague and incomplete for those non-tech folk.

They don't want to scare any part of their audience away from future uses of Apple intelligence. Their audience is tech and non-tech folk alike.

If the tech folk say it's safe and the non-tech folk get comfortable with the basic AI features then they're onto a winner.

How many people's parents/grand parents have iPhones because they're simpler for them to understand who are also scared or don't understand this 'AI thing'. I think Apple have been quite savvy in introducing it slowly and are probably watching the metrics like a hawk!

I suspect image playground is so creepy in an attempt to mark the images as clearly AI generated when they get posted to social media?
Using people with severe mental health problems might be a poor benchmark of performance.
>Something as innocent and common as losing a phone could result in complete account lockout.

This is the biggest misconception I see repeated about passkeys constantly. Account recovery flows generally do not change at all. Passkeys replace passwords, they change nothing at all about account recovery. If you forget/lose your password or your passkey, you go through the reset flow and create a new one.
This is exactly the kind of silliness that I needed before going back to work today.
elites in sales are a myth. it's a manufactured playground.

at least 50 % of customers were primed out of any natural fuck.

( natural/organic meaning intrinsic or emerging desires that are not anchored in any psycho-social perception/manipulation, after the fact of a more or less evolved consciousness/awareness of self )

and a great amount of your customers was fake to make you fucking love your job and feel that success.
The youngest ones would be 60, so yeah, a lot of the cohort would have by now.
> But I would dread having to try and recover a Passkey with Google, who would I even talk to?

That's not what this blog post is about. This blog post is not about using a passkey to login to your email.

This blog post is about using a passkey to login to a website (404 Media) that currently supports login via "magic links," i.e. instead of passwords, they always send you a "forgot my password" link, which you click on in your email.

If you currently login to 404 Media with a magic link, and then decide to login to 404 Media via passkey, and you lose your passkey, you can just get a new magic link sent you via email and reset your passkey, or, if you want, you could just skip the passkeys and go back to always using magic links.

Using passkeys to login to your email itself is a whole different ball of wax. Gmail does not have a simple "forgot my password" email that it sends. (That would be pointless if Gmail is your only email address!)

The "forgot my password" flow for Google/Gmail can involve a bunch of factors, including backup email addresses, backup recovery codes, recovery contacts, SMS, push notification to other apps you've logged into. Google doesn't document all of the factors they consider, and neither do any of the other major email providers.

I get it: it would be scary to login to Google via passkey if Google is your passkey manager, especially because there's no way to export a passkey from one passkey manager to another. Can you trust Google's recovery system?

That's a hard problem for Google, but it's a trivial problem for 404 Media. They just send you a magic link, and rely on Google to keep your email secure.

And, let's face it, most of us run sites that are much more like 404 Media than they are like Google.
amazon is so bad about counterfeits and people listing products from different brands as the same article
A fair number of years ago now, I had a business idea and bought a domain. Within a couple hours I had a person email me offering me $250 for the domain. I countered with $2,000 saying I would have to rebrand. I'd really done literally nothing but buy the domain at that point, but I wasn't interested in selling and it was a "Go Away" price. They accepted.

Used a well known Escrow site. Took a couple days to settle. Quickest $2,000 I ever made. I found out later they were some crypto company with a similar name. They bought it from me just to squat. They still squat it.

I probably could have made way more if I had pushed the issue, oh well.

Never really built much more than a proof of concept for my business idea and never found another domain I liked enough to buy for it.
A feed of trending repos/models from GitHub, Replicate, HuggingFace, and Reddit
ARC-AGI is not yet killed by LLM. O3 achieved a breakthrough only on ARC-AGI-PUB, which is semi-private. Nothing guarantees that the test data wasn't leaked to OpenAI in previous testing rounds, because the model is not running offline.

See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42478098
Show HN: Visualize TypeScript Dependencies of Changed Files in a Pull Request
I made a dependency-cruiser-report-action, it generates a text output in Mermaid.js syntax for the graph of your TypeScript dependencies, then posts it as a comment on the Pull Request.
1: Actually, that's not true! I use Leptos in their "islands" mode for server side rendering. The entire page is sent as an HTML response, and there is little/no "hydration". The WASM file ONLY includes interactive "islands" that are explicitly marked with the #[island] attribute [0]. In other words, the server binary is handling most of the rendering, similar to if I used a templating tool like Askama or Tera.

2: Leptos is generally slower than vanilla JS, I believe for that reason, but comparable to major JS frameworks [1, 2].

[0]: https://book.leptos.dev/islands.html

[1]: https://krausest.github.io/js-framework-benchmark/current.ht...

[2]: https://leptos.dev/
Related to your second point: "FCC seek comments on NextNav petition for rulemaking on lower 900MHz ISM band" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41226802). No, we are not about to lose the band, FCC is still deliberating. The rest of the industry is pushing back.
Grab that 1960 American Express share certificate!

Up until 1965, it was an unlimited liability corporation.
As an engineer I have nothing against OKRs. But it's often the day-to-day management (EM or PM) who tend to override the team's OKRs for upper management to prioritize something ad-hoc & out of scope they agreeably said Yes to.
> I wish this was still what the internet was

Here you go: https://wiby.me.
I always like to observe people who want quick results reading about agile or OKRs or KPIs and then handsomely shooting themselves into foot.

Other fun thing is having management mandate those things and people who don’t have time to understand all that stuff implement it.

Worst one is having ambitious young people thinking if they push for implementing those things they will be „real professionals” - that is how dev teams go to crawl enforcing all BS rules and product teams bikeshedding OKRs instead of delivering stuff.
"By clicking the button, you agree to our Terms of Service."

Might be nice if the last 3 words of that sentence were hyperlinked. (I know the ToS is linked at the bottom of the page, but still).

Also I'm not clear if the $35 payment truly is one-time, for access forever? If so, how will you continue to fund this once user growth levels off?
> captures Japanese phonology better (t->ch before i etc. being a regular sound change)

This I can not let go uncommented, all the more since I wrote something to the same effect myself, and it may, left unqualified, mislead aimlessly wandering souls.

So the classical—'core' if you will—Japanese phonology (i.e. 'speech sound systematics') has it that in the consonantal series like ka-ki-ku-ke-ko, na-ni-nu-ne-no and so on there are some predictable very obvious (and some less obvious, but still very natural) sound changes. In the 't' series which could be *ta-ti-tu-te-to we have, in fact, ta-[ci]-[tsu]-te-to, with the high vowels causing a 'melting', as it were, of the pure stop into sibilant affricates (stop + 's'-class sound).

Now, because these articulatory variants are a 100% predictable it doesn't matter—one should think!—whether one writes "Tusima" or "Tsushima" for つしま (対馬, island bw Jp & ROK), a native speaker will always say [tsuɕima] and actually have difficulties to say [tusima].

However that is not true anymore. It used to be true for 100% of the vocabulary before the 20th c, but when after the war English vocabulary came to Japan like rushing down from opened floodgates it left its mark on Japanese phonology: Now you have a language with a phonological 'core' system and a system for "new words".

The 'core system' applies to almost all words, and certainly all words that were used, say, before the war, no matter whether a given word is classified as Yamato, Kango or some flavor of Gairaigo—they all submitted to the established rules and did not (within the last 200 years anyway) influence the system.

The 'newcomers system' added to that everyday words like je-aru じぇある (JR, Japanese Railways), sumātofon スマートフォン (smartphone), tīn'ējā ティーンエージャー (teen-ager) and so on all of which violate the 'core' system. Observe that next to sumātofon スマートフォン there's also the older loan terehon テレホン (not much used anymore, it's denwa でんわ 電話 most of the time) that does still adhere to the 'core' system, and the same is true to some other words that come in two phonological flavors, not unlike words like "champagne" and "campagne" co-existing in French.

It then becomes preferable to sacrifice the systematic orthographic simplicity for phonetic fidelity. "Hukusima" was an OK spelling and 100% unambiguous only until the latter part of the 20th c, but that has changed.
ebay seems relatively competitive with aliexpress, sometimes even cheaper. amazon everything seems to cost much more
I would imagine people operating at an Olympic level are training and breathing the sport so much it's hard to have a normal career on top that isn't also related to the sport.
And yet you read the whole thing.
I disagree.

Sonnet 3.6 (the 2022-10-22 release of Sonnet 3.5) is head and shoulders above GPT-4 and anyone who has been using both regularly can attest to this fact.

Reasoning models do reason quite well but you need the right problems to ask them. Don't throw open-ended problems at them. They perform well on problems with one (or many) correct solution(s). Code is a great example - o1 has fixed tricky code bugs for me where Sonnet and other GPT-4 class models have failed.

LLMs are leaky abstractions still - as the user, you need to know when and how to use them. This, I think, will get fixed in the 1-2 years. For now, there's no substitute for hands on time using these weird tools. But the effort is well worth it.
I'm with several opinions around. I keep a windows box with office just because of the intrincated format of a long frequently updated bunch of related docs (about 15 years now, time flies...). Used windows 8 until the hdd "expired" recently, now 10 in an inexpensive little cube. For all the rest, mint and cinamom are a perfect fit. Simple as that. I had enough of complex machinery in my (professionally active) time...
That was a lovely writeup, thanks for sharing.
Their problem is that they are just behind now, because they released too early. They haven’t finished iOS 18 yet. They are still working on it, which likely means that iOS 19 isn’t going to get much attention either, because they should be working on iOS 19 now, not still developing iOS 18.

They have set themselves up for a loser in the next year or two, because they can’t double their resources to catch back up to a normal release schedule.
I was not trying to prove my assertion; I was just making an observation based on my personal experience.
(curl) Plain text cryptocurrency prices
https://explaining.software/

https://deprogrammaticaipsum.com/
I don't understand. Wanting everything for free and stealing stuff is just good capitalist praxis. Has been for centuries.
bad analogy. a better one would be: a wheel fell of an F1 car, car hit perimeter wall, driver dies. should we maybe put a crash barrier in front of the wall?
Just entered in 2 potato's and a litre of milk into chronometer. I think the last ingredient is probably gonna need to be 2 things, a dark leafy green for vitamin K, and something for vitamin E, tho I honestly can't find any good candidates besides like sunflower oil (and you'd need like 3 tbsp worth)
And nine, nine async I/O programming APIs were gifted to the race of Linux users, who above all else desire power.
Constitutional change needs Congress and 2/3rds of the states. It’s not out of the realm of possibility.
LOL. The lack of a consistent design is a core accessibility feature.

Most "blind" people have some amount of vision. So starting in 1997 they began adding the very large numerals on the back and visual inconsistencies to the front so you can tell them apart with limited sight. Have a look at the bills side by side and you can see how they vary the background gradients and layout for easier identification: https://www.uscurrency.gov/denominations/100

With the 2020s series refresh (Catalyst) all the denominations will get a tactile area to assist the completely blind.

The government also provides free of charge to any legally blind person a small device that reads special markings on the bill and will audibly announce or vibrate the denomination. They also funded iOS and Android apps that use the camera.
I feel sorry for you, but it is never a good idea to leave everything up to a consultancy of any sort (especially tax or lawyer-related matters) to third parties. On the other hand, this is a good opportunity for you to start a product that actually addresses this issue. I’m sure you’re not alone in facing this challenge. You could charge a nominal subscription fee to your customers.

Regarding your original request, I recommend applying to the recent January posts on HN Hiring (link: https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=whoishiring).

All the best!
Man generates 1000s of lines of (buggy) boilerplate across 70 files, which was neither budgeted nor planned, and his coworkers are annoyed at him... News at 11
Yolc – a Haskell-powered, safe, expressive, fun language for Ethereum
Today is the launch of the technical preview of the Yolc project 1. It is the first milestone where Yolc can produce a partial ERC20 code deployable to Ethereum networks, demonstrating the key idea of linear-type safety.

Read its introduction at: https://yolc.dev/blog/introduce-yolc/

If you are also a Haskell nerd, a slightly more Haskell oriented post too: https://discourse.haskell.org/t/ann-yolc-a-haskell-powered-s...
In most airports you can expect highways, buildings, water and other structures after the runoff area.

The airport where it happened doesn’t appear to have any less clearance than usual around the runway [1], if not more when comparing to Jeju Airport for example [2].

[1] https://maps.apple.com/?ll=34.976342,126.382712&q=Marked%20L...

[2] https://maps.apple.com/?ll=33.515456,126.498733&q=Marked%20L...
Out of current ones, at a quick glance: connect, openat, openat2, renameat, mkdirat, and bind. More importantly, I'd like to block any opcode I haven't whitelisted, even when my software runs on future kernels with more opcodes available.

Now that I think about it, how does io_uring interact with landlock?
If you can get the same features with less risk it seems like a worthwhile thing to consider.

Meaning if we can build the same antenna array but with less risk to airplanes and all at an acceptable economical cost, it feels like something we should do. Regardless of whether or not a runway overrun at other airports and in other situations poses more or less risk.
Eh, I think that’s a misstatement of market dynamics. Yes, congestion is stating that demand is exceeding capacity. However…

Congestion is a pushback signal that reduces actual demand, by reducing quality/utility of the actual ‘product’.

Congestion is demand being throttled through the mechanism of reduction in quality/availability, instead of some other mechanism, like increases in pricing (tolls), or reduction in customers (aka population decreases or exclusionary rules) through the natural usage of the system. Due to induced demand. Because there is almost always more ‘low quality’ demand, than ‘high quality’ demand. It’s a type of tragedy of the commons.

In any ‘free’ system, it almost always ends up this way (see crazy long wait times in nationalized health systems!) precisely because the other options are excluded. Just like on free ways.
I do my best to follow these as much as possible, though I think I am still doing a couple. I just haven't updated my own website in quite a while :/
the shoulda-woulda-coulda.

industries optimize and efficiency should reduce prices, which would allow the spawning of child companies that use industry knowledge to expand to different fields without the focus on making profits for the parent company and this could improve the evolution of civilization and save bunches of people from getting killed by skynet.

so basically, analyzing the potential of industries/companies based on their products and methods, which are mostly available or can be reconstructed via automated research.

in other words, software and automation that fucks the establishment and disrupts their grabby clandestine monopolistic bullshit before it happens.

help employed engineers and other humans to get the fuck away from their shitty employers to build better - TO BUILD BETTER. IT'S 2025, damn it.
A more mature position than mine, thanks for perspective.
ah, bitter sweet memories. a very long time ago I was working on a hw accelerated 2D api, and spent some time on this problem.
It's not only potentially infested with vulnerabilities. It's also not possible to filter io_uring using seccomp at all. So if you allow io_uring, you allow all that is possible with it.
SEEKING WORK

Hi, I'm Riccardo.

Freelance senior frontend engineer with 18 years of experience.

Mentor at Hack Your Future, an initiative to give a fresh start in tech to war refugees and other underrepresented individuals.

Admin of Italia JS, premier JS technology community in Italy.

I like to bring order from chaos for my clients.

Originally from Italy, I'm based in Amsterdam.
You can find me surfing in Portugal.

LAST PROJECT

Total revamp of the UI of a high-frequency Forex trading platform, a real-time data heavy React application.

INFO

Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Europe, UTC+1)

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Availability: Immediately available

Email: riccardo [at] pullcommitpush [dot] com

Website: https://pullcommitpush.com

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ricbevilacqua/

Core skills: JavaScript, TypeScript, React, Vue.js

Other skills: NodeJS, React Query, RTK, WebSocket, React Router, Remix, Astro, Next.js, Nuxt, GraphQL, REST API, Web Components, HTML, CSS, CSS Modules, CSS-in-JS, Vite, Webpack, Docker, AWS, CI/CD, Jest, Testing Library, MSW, Cypress, Git, Coaching Juniors, Frontend Architecture
Almost all B2C services are incredibly low value - is my Facebook or Twitter post really something I protect like my bank account?

But almost all B2B services are high value

So why try and provide one size fits all. Because B2C behemoths want to climb the pole

Look, provide everyone with a HSM, and every web requests made gets signed with said HSM. And if you lose HSM walk into the office and get a new one.

If your service is not worth that effort, really I think we can work with passwords and OTP.
I'm not sure what you mean by "clear cut medical condition" other than that it is easy to test.