skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My bad. I've historically not submitted much, so I'm not in the habit of using search.
The thumbnail of a YouTube video is marketing for that video, it's not a part of the video itself. It's commonly quite divorced in tone (and sometimes even content) from the video.

It's also a good example: you can have an excellent video, but if the thumbnail (marketing) is not spectacular enough, people won't watch it. Another example about how people care little for quality.
There was one swing dance revival already, no reason there couldn't be another one. There's so much more information online about it now then people had when trying to reconstruct the dance style in the 90's as well, so even if it does die in our lifetime maybe there will be a 2120's swing dance revival as well. :)
Up and Atom on YT recently released a nice video explaining this paradox, in case you prefer to learn about it this way like I do.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjZB81jCGj4
For those not familiar with the 1960s "Whiz Kids" attempts of "smart people" to use data and statistics to "fix" business and then government/war, there is a nice brief overview of pros/cons/lessons at:

https://www.amnesta.net/other/whizKids/
>Russians are deeply uncomfortable with actual democratic openness

>It inspired pure panic, as people had never seen anything but utter certainty from their leaders

Russians are not uncomfortable with actual democratic openness. There were periods in Russian history when actual democratic openness was an option. Right before the USSR formation and around 1990s

The problem is that after 1991 you've got a few generations of people who are used to ussr socialism and its ways and guarantees.

You can't expect people to switch from one way of thinking to the other. The state had beed paying them all their lives. Sometime only because they had some kind of job at all. Many of them developed an addiction to their "salary for existence".

You can't go and tell them that starting tommorow they will have to compete on a market that is yet to be build. And that the whole new shiny system like that of the West will be functional 2-3 decades later. And right after they were playing (from their perspective) the same game waiting for the communism.
Your observation is correct. However, I wanted to have a group of users as beta users to get better engagement. What about you get storage with lifetime access, and the "shared code" will be there as long as you don't delete it?
I find that there are limitations of satisfaction from grand accomplishments or capitalistic success.

At the end of the day, we are born naked, die naked and decompose.

Doing what you want to do without some grand goals, interacting with others, helping others, joking around with friends and family with no other “grand” purpose, or just reconnecting with someone you haven’t for a while, all these things shouldn’t be tucked away completely in the name of “achieving more”.
Also, it's usually far easier to support ten customers vs 3,333.
If you are ever a recipient of such an offer (free item, cashback, any benefit) and it is conditioned on writing a positive review (ie giving 1/5 won’t get you the free gift), this is as of recently not allowed and considered fraud.

Should report all such new cases you see to https://reportfraud.ftc.gov/

ftc press release: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/08/...
If you’re wondering why you still feel unsatisfied even after having gotten everything you’ve ever wanted and achieved everything you set out to do, consider reading about the story of Siddartha Gautama and his journey of discovery.

The answers you’ve been looking for are there.
What advantages does your plugin+website have over https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=RolandGr... ?
> "think through this step by step"

Has always made sense to me, if you think how these models were trained.

My experience with great stackoverflow responses and detailed blog posts, they often contain "think through this step by step" or something very similar.

Intuitively adding that phrase should help the model narrow down the response content / formatting
The actual lawsuit does mention the cookie practices, it's the core of their class action.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.44...
I struggle to understand stuff like this (to be honest, it makes me feel a little angry):

> We started getting into regular arguments, and I knew it wasn’t on her. It was me. I was starting to come to terms with all the mounting insecurities I had stuffed down over the past several years. I didn’t feel like I could work on them with her. So I broke things off after almost 2 years of unconditional love. It was extremely painful, but it was the right call. I needed to fully face myself.

Relational experiences are why and how you're encountering your repressed shadow or confronting the false self in the first place. Don't you face yourself by staying and accomplishing your promise of truthfulness and learn how to practice real love through e.g. honesty, courage,….

I found this lecture once on a webpage that has since disappeared....

"Enlightenment isn't a thing that you can get abandoning family and undertaking mountaineering asceticism. Enlightenment can be attained having family, and is a thing that cannot be attained through mountaineering asceticism. Enlightenment starts from accepting Truth and process of understanding Truth." https://web.archive.org/web/20090805085956/http://www.ircsc....
Oh wow, fun. It looks like it might supercede org-capture templates too by some of those actions.
Exactly. Years ago, I did due diligence on a company that targets ads using IP address. They buy IP address data from ISPs, target ads based on demographics, and then use cookies to retarget. Not that far off of what you're describing.
> So yeah, valid extension of my thought experiment, I apologize :-).

No problem, I get how my language was confusing, sorry about that.

> Not having enough money to afford it or having an emotional attachment to something may both take over quality, but it doesn't mean that people do not care about quality.

I would agree with this, actually. People definitely do care for quality to some extent, at least for many categories of products.
There's a bunch of good advice and resources here but in the end sales and marketing is not that different from coding.

To do it well, you have to do it a lot. And you're going to suck at it in the beginning.

The good news is that if you're good at coding then you already know how to be persistent and self-critical and disciplined. You'll see what is working and what isn't and do more of the former and less of the latter until you get good.

I know that's not particularly useful in terms of "how do I speed run this" but I think it's something that most devs don't want to fully grok.
> Consider a developer versed in CRUD apps obsoleted by a code generator AI and, they need to pivot to something different. e.g.: UI, simulation, games or system. That pivot will require different languages, different mindset, different knowledge (simulation and games needs different sets of deep math, UI needs new tools and paradigms, system requires a different knowledge stack from hardware to lower levels of OS, etc.).

This is nothing new, though. There used to be very lucrative job titles like "webmaster" or "web developer" whose daily work consisted of creating bespoke, static websites created with raw HTML and CSS. Whenever a customer wanted their website updated, even if just textual content updates, they got to bill a few hundred bucks to copy and paste the text into their site and upload the updated files onto whatever shared web hosting they were using.

Tools were invented: first WYSIWYG editors like Microsoft Frontpage, then content management systems so users could update their own websites, then full-on SaaS website designers like Wix, and now the current state of, well maybe your business doesn't even really need a website because you can just make a Facebook page instead.

When I was going to university in 2005, I was heavily warned by (cough) "experts" that due to this, plus the imminent wave of outsourcing of "IT" to low-cost developers in India and Bangladesh, that learning web-based software development was a dead-end career path, and US software developer salaries would cap out at $75k unless you got into management... yeah.

So, yes, you'll need to pivot as you always have in the industry. Any potential threat from AI isn't anything new. And it's not nearly as impactful as switching from playing cello to piano.
> In the 1980s everything was written in assembly and you depending on the clock speed. However these days embedded should have learned that the CPU you write for will go out of production and so you should write portable code except for the small shim layers that talk to the real hardware.

Ah... the illusions of "portability". A lot of the reason you want to test your code is that there may be behaviors specific to the target platform (either in the hardware itself, in the compiler, in the runtime, or in support libraries/frameworks). You may well write with the intent to be portable, but you test for the reality that you never really are.
Given the problem size is bounded, all solutions for solving this could be considered O(1).
People lie and embellish on their resumes, and having a set of basic questions about the role/topic that a recruiter can ask can radically reduce the amount of no-hire technical interviews.
I share code by pushing it to Github and using the “Copy permalink” functionality from my editor. Then I get a link directly to that commit/line number.
The Tana super tag concept is pretty neat.

I prefer these outlined based notes tools ( org mode, roam, Tana ) over the document based ones (Obsidian, etc) or db ones ( notion ).

It feels like a personal taste thing. I naturally think in lists and to-dos.
Transform your Mac typing experience with FunKey, the ultimate mechanical keyboard sound simulator! Whether you’re coding, designing, or typing emails, FunKey brings satisfying sound effects to every keystroke, making your tasks more enjoyable and productive.

Why Choose FunKey?

• Over 15 Sound Options: Explore a variety of keyboard sounds, including mechanical mouse clicks.

• Satisfying Typing Experience: Enjoy realistic, high-quality sounds with every keystroke.

• Boost Productivity: Add a touch of fun and focus to your workday.

Funkey features:

• Enjoy pleasing keyboard sounds.

• Get immersive typing experiences.

• Hear the sounds instantly as you type.

• Easy access from your Mac menu bar

• It's a fast native Mac app. Built exclusively for your Mac.
I use gist remotes a lot by creating a gist and adding it as a remote to a local git directory.

If i were using your tool, it would be nice to have a single "turbogist" repo for all of the gists. That way i could send gists into it with git push

you could do something clever like this by having turbogist server manage the prefixes , so a git push from any repo would automatically consolidate all of the various prefixes into the turbogist account
There are virtually no limits (for Mandelbrot and computing in general) because there are few limits on the growth of knowledge [5].

In a few decades we will have learned to take CO2 (carbon dioxide) molecules out of the air [4] and rearrange the carbon atoms in 3D structures atom by atom [6]. We will be able to grow the transistors and the solar cells virtually for free. Energy will be virtually free, a squandrable abundance of free and clean energy [2]. At that point we will start automatically self-assembling Dyson Swarms constructions of solar cells with transistors on the back [1] on the Quebibyte scale to capture all the solar output of the sun [3] and get near-infinite compute for free. We would finally be able to explore the Mandelbrot space at full depth within our lifetime.

[1] https://gwern.net/doc/ai/scaling/hardware/1999-bradbury-matr... and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrioshka_brain

[2] Bob Metcalfe Ethernet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axfsqdpHVFU

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale

[4] Richard Feynman Plenty of Room at the Bottom https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There%27s_Plenty_of_Room_at_th...

[5] David Deutsch: Chemical scum that dream of distant quasars https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQliI_WGaGk

[6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Spr5PWiuRaY and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1ebzezSV6s
If life is abundant, there must have been something to prevent it from spreading, now or in the distant past. The fact that we evolved in an apparently empty universe, rather than in one that's been totally colonized, implies something stops this from happening. This thing is called the Great Filter, and it's apparently extremely effective.

If the GF is in front of us, in a universe with lots of ETI, our chances of evading it are extremely small. After all, no one else has; why would we be so special?

Nick Bostrum has called detection of ETI, or even complex ET life, the worst news mankind would ever receive. It would be a death sentence for our future.

https://nickbostrom.com/papers/where-are-they/
I was there through 2016, and I was explicitly told not to work on weekends because it might make others on the team think they would have to do the same.
> who have difficulties w/ keyboards/are using styluses is something a bit different from the traditional view

This part would be interesting, I perennially wish I could code on my tablet, but the IDEs there are just too awkward.

The big issue is, I still want a touch-type interface (like a keyboard) so that I can rapidly access many different concepts, but the Android UI is just too constrained by me having to peck slowly one key at a time.

I.e. the problem (there) is not the code, it is the input method. What I really need is the ability to access my idioms with multiple fingers, but without smudging my feedback loop (the mobile screen).

Perhaps some method of inputting code as symbols with a stylus could work better? Although it might still be very awkward...
They have top notch tech, yes, but it’s massively overkill for literally every company that’s not at google’s scale. If you’re not careful you may hire someone who will try to replicate everything google does, when you may need only 1% of the complexity. This is the experience I’ve generally had with xooglers… they lament that they don’t have the same tools/tech stack they had at google, and so their first act is to try to move everything to the closest open source equivalents, even if they’re not a good fit.

There’s good things and bad things to take away from experience at google… you have to be careful to ignore things that won’t actually help you.
Thank you. Ridiculous that every other acronym was defined except the one in the title..
The family still lives.
> What makes NATO proximity so bad for Russia?

NATO was created as an anti-Soviet bulwark. The Soviet Union is gone, yet NATO has continued to expand in a manner which seems designed to weaken the strategic position of Russia. Add to that America's history of color revolutions and military aggression, and it would be difficult not to interpret this as anything other than a threat.

Imagine China entered into a "defensive" military alliance with Mexico. Imagine you spoke to a Chinese friend about it, and they demanded that you justify "what makes Chinese proximity so bad for America?", as though the Chinese have just as much reason to place their military assets along our southern border as we do! Would you consider such a question to be in good faith?

> Do they actually think NATO would use it to launch invasions? Do they have no idea how much Europe hates war and military combat?

Within living memory, 10 million Soviets were killed in an unprovoked invasion from Europe. It's hardly unreasonable for them to be concerned.
More to it than that, alleging unjust enrichment among things in the latest amended filing: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.44...
Isn't it a bit weird to call 4chan "the dark web" on a technical website?
I don't follow how many killers posted their manifesto on reddit, etc, but it's a platform and as such can be abused like any other platform.
I think the point can be made that Reddit has worse content than 4chan, and often with worse life consequences as there is no anonymity.
It's in any case quite a stretch to lump it into dark web, as if you could buy weapons on the site.

Anyway, I think you have a point in that you can disable Google's porn filter, but you cannot disable Google's wrongthink filters. Google search is manually tweaked to redirect many types of queries to their opposite, safe alternative (like searching for Alex Jones will only give you 'why is alex jones such a bad person', and not act as a search engine, which would be neutral).

Things have changed gradually and there hasn't been so much pushback on this, unfortunately.
> When you have enough money to not work, it becomes very lonely fast

I haven't made enough to not work but once my US immigration was sorted out (H1B isn't very leisure compatible), I took a year off to rediscover what all passed me by when I was working.

This was a lot of alone time, but not true loneliness.

For example, I would set up lunch with a friend, they would bail due to work emergencies or something but I would go eat there anyway.

Quickly learned to go to a place where multiple people were scheduled anyway, like heading to Berkley for a tech talk on Byzantine block chains or vector search algorithms, hoping something would interest me.

> OP seems to be going through a belonging crisis. Trying to figure out what group he wants to belong to

The first three months were a strange struggle with my Ego, because a large part of my "Get up and do things" was the belief that what I had to do was very important to others and the whole world stops if I stop moving. To get through the waves in life without feeling self pity about it, I honestly felt my work was what made the sun rise and the rain fall.

Suddenly, my self importance was shot to pieces immediately.

I wasn't important anymore, what I did wasn't important to others but only to me. All the years of sacrificing my own wants (not needs) suddenly felt dissonant.

Plus a lot of activities aren't cumulative in the way work is - cooking dinner today does nothing for dinner tomorrow, there's no way to add up that to something.

Work is particularly rewarding because it checks those two boxes for me - it adds up to something, slowly every day, plus what I do is important to others in way where they want you to succeed (unlike say training for the SF marathon, where it's all "I could never" from people who could, but don't want to).

Eventually, I went back to work, but now I drink that workahol in moderation.
With TurboGist, you don't need to create a Pastebin and paste that link on Slack to send a piece of code. You'll generate a link to add team members to your team, then just share the code with anyone or everyone on your team.
Well said. I've worked in adtech and this aligns with my experience. Alphabet probably wouldn't even make that much more money compared to its current ad program. There's no shortage of supply in display advertising.
About 20 years ago I took a few courses in beginner's swing at the local community center that was co-taught by Sylvia Sykes. Had no clue she was well known in the swing dance community until much later.
>a straight shot to Moscow versus already in

1000km vs already in, right.

>Putin didn't have enough materiel between Moscow and Prighozin to keep the fight from getting to Moscow.

Putin had at least 600k military personnel around the country at the time (200k even if we take into the account that a good part of this number are paperworkers and such). Not to mention all kinds of police, special units etc.

This was a political problem for him (using your own military against Prighozhin would at least make him look week or even illegitimate at the time). Not a "technical".
Dostoevsky and Tolstoy are absolutely political, only not necessarily left-wing.
This post indicates remote in Canada but the linked postings say United States under "Work Eligibility", can you please clarify this requirement?
I can’t help but feel that every different flavor of formalization of the process of collaborative [software] development feels… nearly the same? At the end of the day.

Whether there is a self-conscious attempt to avoid being accused of dogmatics, or alternatively a fully embraced biblical dogma, it all feels like the same basic advice repackaged in new language. Sometimes the formalism is meant to create a framework to help the team organize better, but…

I feel like it all just comes down to:

- above all, be consistent but not too rigid

- talk with your colleagues, keep up to date with each other

- think about your constraints and goals frequently and check in with how you are relating to them

- work hard but not too hard

- have some systems, any systems in place, to check for poor work product and highlight good work product. What is good work product? Well, to use the famous quote, you’ll know it when you see it!

To be fair, some frameworks may obviously help some teams more than others, but like any tool evaluation and selection process, it always seems so highly contingent which process management method might work well or not, many might work equally well, and most of it comes down to the team and people more than it does the system…

I could be totally wrong as I don’t have much experience in teams or orgs beyond 5-10 people, but still… just my surface level understanding of all this.

I’m curious what others on here with far more experience and exposure to a variety of organizational frameworks have found and think about my assessment.
> This innovation could someday revolutionize traffic management by 2025.

We read this so you didn't have to. Nothing but slop, presented in a way to make you think it's going to happen.
It's like an unholy mix of The Guild, Critical Role, and Leeroy Jenkins.
HORNET: RNA structure visualization method correlates sequence and 3D topology
> However, with T steps of CoT, constant-depth transformers using constant-bit precision and O(logn) embedding size can solve any problem solvable by boolean circuits of size T

There is a difference between being equivalent to a circuit and prediction of the output of the BVSP.

That is what I was suggesting learning descriptive complexity theory would help with.
I worked in a place where we took XP very seriously. The culture supported it. And I can say that place was one of the best places to work and learn in.

Fast forward a couple years and I land in a full remote team as a tech lead/manager role. I try to bring XP into the team, and the pain was real. Not a single person would get behind it. Needless to say, the culture of the entire org plays a huge role in the success of XP.
Amazing, isn't it? All some scientist had to do was take a stroll to the nearest bubble, scoop up some of the local vacuum, and bring it back home to weigh it.
original title: Introducing HORNET, a novel RNA structure visualization method that correlates sequence and 3D topology
That link didn’t work for me, a few paragraphs down it just shows a swirling “please wait why we verify access”.

In case anyone else has the same issue;

https://archive.is/2025.01.02-101341/https://www.nytimes.com...
> I just wish I was able to 24/7 do those things

Wait, you don't?

Do you have less than 24 hours a day to do things?
I'm Ops type person so I work at companies where there is a split between the two. Ops is a skill not all developers have or frankly, not even mindset to properly do so you will need a team/person to do it. Generally companies don't like the cost of embedding Ops person into every team and that can create redundant work so they form a DevOps/SRE team.

Good resource for different types of teams is here: https://web.devopstopologies.com/