skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, that comes far later, after energy self-sufficiency, at which point your operational expenses can be minimized. Then we can start talking about going fully vertical to reduce our supply chain dependencies.

If you're concerned about silicon dependencies, I'd recommend starting with some real estate purchases (mines) and forming a Special Economic Zone first, though.

Remember this is about being an owner and not a renter. The only restriction is our recurring costs, but we have unlimited room upfront, like a Lincoln.
Alternatively, the Previas were always there, and they developed the memory of seeing it after having been exposed to the ad.

(To be clear, I'm not being facetious -- this is a viable possibility)
I could say the same thing about the NPCs in a video game and you wouldn't be able to tell the difference, because they wouldn't share any of their lives, hopes and dreams with you at any point.

Sure, people (probably) have their own lives; but believing this and being able to actually tell are two completely different things.

I dunno, there's something about the way you responded that rubs me entirely the wrong way. You seem to take my comment and then take the worst, instead of most generous interpretation of it. I posed a hypothetical, and it seems like you accuse me of considering every person in the world an NPC.
Safely writing to /tmp/ was solved in 1986. Personally I would consider this class of bug the "idiot software developer" class (or to be more charitable: "security-illiterate software developer"). My evidence? There are (at least) six different OS primitives that will avoid this bug.
What missing features do you see as a roadblock?

I installed iTerm2 on my work Mac because it came so highly recommended, but I honestly never remember to open it over the regular terminal. ~All of the features that matter to me in a terminal are features of the shell and the OS, not of the emulator itself.
Personally if I were in those shoes, I would focus on contributing directly to open source projects, both directly by volunteering, and financially. Its worthwhile work that has major impact, and you don't need to work 24/7 if you don't want to.
Its an extreme low side estimate.

And the chance that Pool OR Fencing is one is pretty high.
Weird it just popped up. Probably they cranked up a new algo that said, if they live near water, hit 'em with kayak ads. Why not paddle boards or boats too? Whatever.
My inaccuracy not withstanding, you supply the data to prove my point, that it is common for men to experience depression in retirement. And my suggestion that they should be considered seems just as true.

Your suggestion about my motives makes no sense, I made no comparison to women. It sounds like that may have something to do with you, not me.

Perhaps ask yourself: why does a suggestion that these men deserve some sympathy or at least consideration provoke you into harshly criticizing me?
To host a raspberry pi from scratch, you must first create the internet
Especially at Atlassian.
I can see that you are extremely emotionally invested in this decision for some reason, but there’s no need to resort to these type of hysterical personal attacks. I have no horse in this race, I am just providing the apparently persuasive (and winning) counter to your argument.
Step 1 is always "Create the universe".
It's true, I was considering only the original mov rax, 1 case, which I'm pretty sure compilers don't generate: it's just a useless encoding of mov eax, 1.

Given that 64-bit immediate math also causes this though, compilers might generate it (I think this is a minor missed optimization by gcc though: it could have used add eax, 1 instead.
I just built a new PC literally yesterday and decided to try Win11. It has been shocking how terrible of an experience it is.

The very first thing I saw was TikTok, Facebook, Instagram and some other bloatware apps installed in the start menu (this is a Pro install, not Home edition)

The start menu itself is basically just a copy of a mobile phone's home screen.

I can no longer place my taskbar to the top as I've done for the last 20 years.

A disgusting amount of telemetry is enabled by default, including what is basically a keylogger, and I don't trust them for a second that they actually stop sending everything through even if you disable it in the group policy editor.

The right-click context menu requires 2 clicks to get the usual list of actions.

In order to change to the dark theme, you have to login with a microsoft account. Many other settings are also disabled until you login.

Edge gives you a truly pathetic nag if you type in Firefox on Bing. It constantly nags at you afterwards. I actually laughed out loud at how sad and pathetic it was, literally begging you to keep using Edge.

Explorer hangs constantly and is infuriatingly slow, even on my extremely fast and for now empty SSD. Search is useless despite the indexing feature.

I could go on. There're some small nice improvements like better dark mode support (though still not perfect and there's still lots of legacy windows). HDR support is better. The new settings app is better if only cause things aren't split between the control panel and it anymore.

However there being ads and suggested items popping up in my start menu disgusts me. The fact that you have to debloat the OS yourself, find 3rd party tools to fix all the garbage decisions M$ made, all for what basically amounts to microscopic sidegrades compared to Win10 just makes it a nogo.

I don't care about security "updates", I'll be using Win10 for a long, long time.
> Although I sincerely worry that empathizing with people like this is a trap.

I have a similar sense. However, I’m not sure empathizing with them is itself the trap. You don’t want your empathy to make you overly credulous. For example, while you might empathize with him feeling directionless at the acquiring company, I don’t think you should therefore conclude that he is right about the new coworkers being “NPCs.”
Point D is a thing we assume about software but over time you realize it's not the case. You'll see a native macOS app like Terminal and assume it's blessed by Apple, has its own dedicated team with daily standup and meetings, but it's actually just propped up by random tickets in a larger issue tracker, doesn't have a dedicated team, and depends on what amounts to begrudged work or charity work by whoever happens to work on a ticket in passing.

A random rockstar will come in and move the code forward 5 years never to be seen again.
This is exactly the company we've built. As a bonus we have pretty interesting technical problems. I think a big reason our company is like this is because the almost the entire leadership team are in their 40's and have young kids. We care a lot about growth of the company but we've removed all the BS of operating a company so that we can fit it into our lives.
No problem!

I made https://love-15.com which works on the web and as of today is on the iOS app store. I'll probably get it on Steam after that. I prefer playing the native builds personally.

It's fully free and about the smallest game design I could think of - I did it partly from a longstanding desire to make this specific game (I played a very similar thing decades ago on Palm Pilot) and partly as an experiment about just how much work can you get an LLM to do.
Kuvasz-streamer: open-source CDC for Postgres for low latency replication
Because you can't tell from the outside? You can only choose to believe everyone else is like you based on what you observe.
YMMV; this is not universally true.
> It's explicitly monotonic, except for apps that have a very fast ID rate

"might generate two IDs in the same millisecond" is not a very exotic occurrence. It makes a big difference whether the rest is guaranteed or not.

> And PostgreSQL used one of these recommended approaches and documented it.

Well that's the center of the issue, right? OP's interpretation was that PostgreSQL did not document such, and so it shouldn't be relied upon. If it is a documented promise, then things are fine.

But is it actually in the documentation? A source code comment saying it uses a certain method isn't a promise that it will always use that method.
How does that not absolutely destroy your knife?
Of course there are optimizations to be made, such as not joining on the raw data or saving the order by to last. And avoid outer joins between two large sized partitioned tables.

But to me those optimizations are not imperative in nature.

(And BQ will probable eat the 10 million to 10 million join for breakfast...)
> Only power users are using this, and they tend towards power user tools.

I have a souped-up zsh config that I clone to all my systems, but I've honestly never seen the point in optimizing my terminal emulator. The shell itself provides the real functionality, and it's cross-platform so by leaning on it I get the same features whether I'm on my KDE desktop, MacBook, or SSH'd in via Termux.

What power user features am I missing by ignoring the emulator and focusing on the shell?
a very robust and advanced search… like if I wrote it, it would be like a prompt-based thing
>supervillains Redditers imagine billionaires to be

Sure, they are just people like you and me. Doesn't mean their mere existence isn't evidence of a major flaw in our implementation of capitalism. Our society is becoming far too stratified. Healthcare should be a right at this point in our society's development, it's a stain on our country that we still carry on with a system that works for nobody except health insurance CEOs.
You are rightfully proud of your skills!
> Russia barely seems concerned about casualties on its own side

I think this is because they boiled the frog slowly. They could not have started the draft right away.
I'll take the money. I've got a bajillion things I want to work on and not enough time because I have to spend 40 hours a week at my day job. Give me enough money to live on passive income, and I will just work on self-directed interesting things.

I mean I will also probably spend about the first three months just catching up on video games, but after that I have a couple of mpd plugins I've been meaning to write, and that's just for starters.
SEEKING FREELANCER | US | Remote

Building a small puzzles site on my own, need help with monetization / advertising. Looking for someone who has some or all of the following:

- Relationships with major ad networks, including Google Ad Exchange and other demand partners, and can facilitate approvals even for sites with smaller user bases or non-traditional formats.
- Able to recommend and implement solutions such as rewarded ads, native placements, or partnerships that align with my user experience.
- Can assist with integrating ad solutions into my React and Express.js stack, ensuring high performance and minimal disruption to my gameplay experience.
- Can build a monetization approach that grows with my site, avoiding pitfalls like requiring DNS hosting or intrusive ad formats.

Email in profile.
> So, I am guessing, some marketing weirdo thinks there is some weird connection between something else in my life an Kayaks.

That would explain the intensity, but I’d still be surprised to see any patterns not found by ML/statistics.

It seems to me that somebody in your life has gotten into Kayaks. Take it as a challenge to find out who it is.
Absolutely.

I recently read "The Life You Can Save" by Peter Singer, and it really does a great job of making the case for generosity even amongst middle class 1st world individuals.

ebook/audiobook are free from their website:
https://www.thelifeyoucansave.org.au/the-book/
> because the hive mind of society always (read: _always_) (let me reiterate: always) favors lowest cost, all else being equal

All else is rarely equal. Be it with luxury brands, or with sustainability. See airlines giving consumers the option to pay for Sustainable Aviation Fuel, people literally pay more for the exact same product just because of the wider environmental benefits.
Alice: I have an urge.

Bob: Oh yeah? I have a demiurge!

Alice: I feel we're not really communicating.
In practice though that's not how it works

People regularly miss posts
I am incredibly relieved to hear that the Leaf is finally getting a redesign.

I chatted with a poor fellow in a Leaf trying and failing to charge on the single sad broken CHAdeMO plug at a station, and was just thinking... yeah, Nissan sold you a bad car, I'm really really sorry.
If you're feeling too rich you don't need to cure it by donating all your money etc. Simply buy a jet and make fancy friends. Soon you wont be rich anymore, your existential dilemma will vanish and you can get back to working.
> could happen with any project, and switching tools doesn’t provide meaningful protection

Do you believe that developments practiced have an impact on security bug rate? Second, do you believe that past track record is reflective of that security bug rate?

These are two reasonable beliefs that many people hold. It's a far more nuanced view than "every project could have bugs" which is a black-and-white view that does not assess risk in a useful way.
>So how does the phone + ad networks decide which words to prioritize to trigger which ads when?

The same way they analyze your email and web searches. Basically, statistics.

>To me this is the problem with these anecdotal tests. You understood that that was an important phrase in the context of ad targeting. But how did the automated ad system know it should serve you ads on that topic, and not one of the many other advertisable topics you talk about over the course of several days? Or that your phone hears over several days?

Buddy, so many people have witnessed this happening for at least 10 years and even done experiments at this point that it's common knowledge. I know for a fact that one of my friends now has a phone that is especially receptive to hearing me say things around it, because our conversation topics ALWAYS come up in my searches, ads, and feeds shortly after. Think about that. Someone else's phone sends data to a cloud that I never gave permission to. It then puts that together with data from MY phone about where I was (perhaps even the devices chirping at each other!). The aggregation happens within a week then I see relevant ads. I've seen this happen dozens of times. It's no coincidence.

As far as the article, I'm not even going to read it. It's got to be stupid. We know from leaks, reverse-engineering, and personal experience that this spying is going on. I question the source of this article, but I suppose we should never underestimate the lengths someone will go to in order to feel that they are smarter than the rest of us with our eyes open.
Can we all agree that if this boils down to a packet-switched vs. circuit-switched distinction as the crux of whether it can be effectively regulated under current law, that is a profoundly stupid outcome and bad public policy?

Surely Congress did not intend to concern itself with such implementation details, and if a regulatory regime conceived in a world that was all circuit-switched is now ill-suited to the economics of a world that is mostly packet-switched, it's not the court's place to invent a way to exclude packet-switched networks from laws that don't care about that distinction.

(I'm also not at all convinced that internet backbone/backhaul congestion is sufficiently different from telephone switchboard congestion from a standpoint of market dynamics.)
I think big banks are definitely up there with the organisations that can have legitimate worldwide impact on climate change. So it's matter of either not believing in it, or deciding it's not worth it.
> If you manage to help make a powerful machine and then convert some piece of it into liquid value, you are probably good at stuff

Not at all. Nobody is "good at stuff" in general. People have particular areas of competence at best. Disasters arise when someone who has achieved success off the back of one particular skill set assumes they have general competence at everything and then makes leadership decisions from a position of blind arrogance.

If you manage to help make a powerful machine, you are probably a good machinist. This does not mean you should become a CEO or a venture capitalist or some other sort of "value decider." Your skill is in making powerful machines. If you want to move into a new field, you have to do so as a beginner.
You need to constantly launch new satellites as old ones undergo orbital decay and run out of fuel.
It's in the ArchiveBox git repo and I may give it it's own library eventually, but for quick linking it's easier to read / less dependent on the rest of that codebase as a standalone script.
I'd push back against the 1-2%. I think the reality is, 1-2% is the group of people who will exploit the system and more importantly, have the means to do so. But the number of people who would exploit the system is probably quiet a bit higher, but it doesn't matter because they don't have the means to do so.
I don’t believe in giving advice, I don’t assume to know what’s best for you. I’m not rich and have had a mediocre developer career but I have found contentment and fulfillment in personal development. I have learned to be an unconditionally kind and loving person to everyone, even the most difficult of people, and to me this is a forever challenging and fulfilling role to play that also provides me a sense of identity. I value developing relationships with humans. I like hearing their stories and getting to know them and learning to be mutually vulnerable in loving, kind ways. I think all we really have is each other, and I think a lot of people would find this to be a really fulfilling way to live their lives.
> … widespread belief that it's easy for low-performers…

The truth is that most high performers do menial busy work that doesn’t impact real bottom lines either. Everyone sits around doing things knowing that their job doesn’t need to exist and rather than call out the madness of a society focused on busywork for the appearance of “productivity” everyone just rips on each other instead… Society could use a lot more empathy and a lot less fear.
> With that said, Revit does a lot of things well and there are no realistic alternatives.

Vectorworks? Archicad? I'm really only familiar with the former, full disclosure I used to work at Vectorworks, and we certainly considered ourselves a competitor to Revit.
Being young and healthy goes a long way. I was happier when I was a poor ahh college student but that doesn't mean losing all my money and possessions would be good for my mental health.
> Why does everything cluster into the same choices?

i suspect it's the same reason you get a cluster of the same stores/shops in a region.

It's the classic economic dilemma - Hotelling's law (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotelling%27s_law)
I love this story so much. Ask an llm to reason about your company devops decisions, get advice to do something you don't recognize, follow the advice without looking up what it means, surprised pikachu face.

In the current climate of lay people and pointy hair bosses saying ai can do this job or make it so more people can do this job without having to know things, this gives me a snarky chuckle.

I'm glad you learned what spot instances are (you did learn, right? They are limited time instances you can bid a price for and if the "spot" price goes above your bid they get reclaimed. They are NOT just magically cheaper servers everyone else just didn't know about). The big takeaway you should have, however, is that understanding what you're doing is important in this business and it's worth the time to at least try to understand everything you're working with. This applies every time, no matter if you are told to do it by a senior dev, a clueless pm, or a mindless robot.

I think you're setting yourself up for more failure if your takeaway is just to ask chatbots to do more of them understanding for you instead of less (which is how I read your takeaway #2).

Good luck out there! We've all made dumb production level mistakes; make sure you learn from yours!
A simple framework and scalable digital note-taking method for Apple Notes
As a founder, the people relying on him would have been the employees at Loom. But now that’s done. Far from the first story about a founder feeling unmoored after a buyout.
Fwiw, it's not your responsibility to maintain a secure computing environment (assuming you're a researcher). If you, personally, have to vet the whole system and all the software you use for security, then they have none.

A competent system administrator with a knowledge of system security can easily configure a host so that when you SSH in, files you create are not given world-readable permissions by default. They can add other lock-down mechanisms that isolates all the users' files entirely. And they can simply disable all world-writeable folders like /tmp/.

So in case anyone gives you (or anyone else) a load of crap about using insecure software, ask them why their systems are so insecure.
What has the highest margin and therefore the most ad spend? Probably fancy folding kayaks. Kayaks are also popular with fishing in a way paddle boards aren’t. And either that person or his neighbors or friends are into fishing and Google knows this
Most important recipes of the past 100 years
This also makes intuitive sense to me, and the old theory some decades back that extrinsic happiness tops out at $150k or so sounded silly to me.

There are so many reasons for someone to be miserable, and money is just one of them, and many can't be easily ridden by money.
My Canadian constitution isn't very fond of grits. But, "when in Russia..." I suppose.
I have serious doubts that this guy would identify anyone I consider "the most educated or compassionate" for any topic, though.
> - Don't depend on other people's software services.
> - Buy a domain and host your own website.

I had the exact chain of thought, only to find that traffic of the site I built is at the mercy of how Google decided to rank webpages, and putting AI > youtube > Reddit in front of everything else.

> - Mailing lists beat social media accounts.

Similarly, Google set the metric for what counts as spams. Your emails can all go to the spam folder if their AI decides it should.
Feral hogs represent an immediate threat to peyote
VW ID.4! Definitely not the best car in the segment, but the best car at the time for the price. It's really been a dream of a vehicle!
Of course it’s therapy. He should find a good non-rich CBT therapist (just for the sake of not falling prey of rich-man-wive’s leeches type) and start asking questions on why he’s not at ease with the success. Something sabotages it, and that something may be some a random (now obsolete) belief/mode he picked growing up. Uproot obsolete beliefs, these are drivers, not goals. This is absolutely manageable, especially with so much time on your hands and relatively limitless possibilities.

I don’t think that community/society advices itt are on point, because the author doesn’t express particular interest in socio things. Giving something up to feel good is not a bad thing, but it’s not a complete-able thing either. It’s still symptomatic despite being generally positive.
This forum, and the country as a whole, leans significantly further right today than it did 7 years ago. You'll now find way fewer people willing to openly disagree with conservative-minded rulings from the government.
> the Telecommunication Act appears to refer to the Internet primarily as something that runs on top of telecommunication links.

It most certainly does; the statutory definition is that there can be no information service without an underlying telecommunication service. So how could any court rule that ISPs who own the wires coming into my house are providing purely an information service and no part of their business can be regulated as a telecommunication service?
Why is Blender in Financial Trouble?
thanks for sharing! let me know if there are any obvious errors of omission or commission