skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
One. WhatsApp is pretty big in Turkey
I don't think anyone is saying it's not reproducible without code, it's just much more difficult for absolutely no reason. If I can run the code of a ML paper, I can quickly check if the examples were cherry-picked, swap in my own test or training set... The new technique or idea was still the main contribution, but I can test it immediately, apply it to new problems, optimise the performance to enable new use-cases...

It's like a chemistry paper for a new material (think the recent semiconductor thing) not including the amounts used and the way the glassware was set up. You can probably get it to work in a few attempts, but then the result doesn't have the same properties as described, so now you're not sure if your process was wrong or if their results were.
3 cybers, 240 cells, go!
The problem with session zero imo, is that the vast majority of campaigns you play with strangers/non-close acquaintances only lasts 2-3 sessions in my experience. Dedicating one session to just setup is not really feasible.

If you're playing a long campaign, you're playing with friends and you probably already know each other well enough to know what flies and what doesn't.

I just don't see how it's a good solution for anyone, but all human interaction is messy, and the problem they are trying to solve definitely exists, so they couldn't have just ignored the problem, so they offered a one size fits all solution that's ideal for probably no one.
You would be surprised how much of corporate cybersecurity is done like this. It has not in anyway improved sine crowdstrike, on the contrary EDR shenanigans has probably grow 100% since last year.

These security companies must have really good salesmen. Or maybe IT departments are always ran by clueless fools, who knows?
What a coincidence! I have done the exact same thing but on Instagram instead of Facebook and have had similar results to yours. Since both belong to Meta, we can safely assume that they use the same or very similar backends to serve ads.

I think it would be interesting to do a large scale experiment to see what can happen.
None, but many 15 year olds do. And it sticks to their 18.
> no other wide open implementation (like Rust has)

So (at least according to pjmlp in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42548360) Rust also only has a single "wide open" implementation.

Which means Rust doesn't have any "other" open implementation either, right?

Honestly, it's hard to know what of all the pro-Rust stuff one sees (here and elsewhere on-line) to take seriously, when its advocates constantly -- consciously or not -- exaggerate its virtues like this.
Well, i think Elixir/Phoenix is better Rails than real Rails - great developer experience (and developed by rails contributors)
Ah yes. DRM.

1. Companies offer service that people don't want to pay for, and blame piracy.

2. Someone realizes that they can eliminate piracy and make lots of money by offering good service.

3. Piracy slowly dies, because people prefer €5 monthly subscription over torrent.

4. Other companies catch up. The market gets fragmented. By the nature of the market, it becomes impossible for one company to offer clearly good service.

5. Piracy gets fashionable again because it's more accessible than having twenty €50 subscriptions, half of them with ads.

6. Companies offer service that people don't want to pay for, and blame piracy.
Car makers want vertical integration. They want CarPlay gone and their own system in. I personally will not buy a car without CarPlay.

My phone knows me on a deeper level than my car could ever know me. I want it to be the center point of my experience while driving.
Thanks @carreau. I think the documentation is amazing! Zasper is built on the great work and documentation from Jupyter team. I will reach out to Jupyter media strategy team.
It's not that they don't understand, it's that they don't care, more often than not. Sadly there has been a societal shift in my view that will be hard to reverse, just think of Boeing as an extreme example. We've created incentive structures that not only reward short-sighted decision making, but also created social norms that punish people who try to push for long-term goals or things that are not in one's immediate self-interest. Corporate sees you as a headache for not thinking about nothing but line going up, and your peers will deride you as a fool for not "getting it" and giving up like they have.
Phone Is Dirtier Than a Toilet Seat
Amazing! What game was this for? I was involved in the RE efforts around UO way back in the day.
> Holding Honey to a different standard isn't going to work for them.

I think the perceived difference is that influencer A or B got someone to click a link to a store while Honey used a browser extension to reset the affiliate attribution when the user was already at the store on the checkout page about to click to purchase. They didn't drive the user to the store. That's a big difference.
It is not- it is a tremenous relief. If Lumen doesnt fit your needs you can go back to light baking which of course nobody wants to.
For years social media sites have been able to hide behind the Chapter 120 defence, because they didn’t generate the content, so they’re not liable for it.

I wonder if their AI boys will open them up to lawsuits. If their not recommends a product or location that turns out to be dangerous, or medical advice that is harmful etc.
From what I understand, they use DRM to support this segmentation. Applicable both to the state of affairs and the hack
c# (and the project i was working on) destroyed my love of programming
> It is not a good way of doing science, but it is the best we have.

It may have been for some time, but there is human social dynamics in play.
Latin’s sentence structure is much more flexible than languages such as English. For example, Latin uses cases for nouns to indicate which is the subject and which is the object, whereas English uses word order. This allows Latin sentences to be constructed in various orders without affecting meaning. It also leads to Latin’s reputation for trying the patience of students such as myself (studied for five years at school many years ago).
To further emphasize the point, the author of this guide suffered from mental breakdown: https://www.reddit.com/r/occult/comments/5t66gg/comment/dduk...

One thing that makes me wonder: how does intentionally created psychosis compare to involuntary one? Can science study those things to have better understanding of mental health and actually help people?
> versus just a quick chat,

Everybody is free to keep a blog for this kind of informal chat/brainstorming kind of communication. Paper publications should be well-written, structured, thought-through results that make it worthwhile for the reader to spend their time. Anything else belongs to a blog post.
One, in Denmark, we have a system called MitID (basically SSO login for public services (and private services can use it too). Even though there are other options (hardware totp dongle and such), most people have the app installed - I would guess easily over 90% (over the age of 13).
Knock knock

Who's there?

Oh, it's the changes to the EPCA of 1975 the auto industry lobby asked for!
Deno 2 • Ryan Dahl • GOTO 2024 [video]
is there a typescript alternative?
I've had to do some maintenance on Rails apps in the past, coming from my Java background, and it was painful as hell. It's just what you're familiar with. I can take my Java and Spring Boot, both of which I'm very familiar with, and write an article like that to wonder why Ruby has not something awesome like Spring Boot. But I don't do that, because it'd be equally embarrassing. Spring Boot for me is super productive, has a lot of batteries included, and is a dream to work with, hence I have no desire to play with Rails. Had I stumbled into Rails development, as a career path, I'm sure it'd talk about this the opposite way.
Notion is basically a wiki too, and seems pretty popular in startups. If you squint a bit, Obsidian as well.
Rust – A Green Language for 21st Century [2020]
with a Mac and iPhone, you can probably achieve the same thing without any additional hardware
Cursor-Like Editing on the iOS
Is there an app similar to Cursor IDE? Primarily looking for something where I can use my own API keys.
Stretching when I wake up, doing yoga and/or swimming and/or lifting has done a lot for me.

Time spent on it varies between 2h (very lazy week) and 10h (very active week).

I feel like this helped me prevent a lot of the symptoms described both in the writeup and comments.
Seems to be dead/down at the moment... noticed because my browser still showed me the same news as 2 days ago ;)
As engineers we often aim to perfection, but oftentimes it is not really needed. And this is such case.

Knowledge is organised into topic, and each topic has a title and a goal. Topics are made of markdown chunks.

I see the model being able to generate insightful questions about what is missing to the chunks. As well as synthesise good answer for specific queries.
They provide 4K playback via Microsoft Edge to PCs that have a HEVC codec pack installed, where all the connected monitors support HDCP 2.2 over that connection port and if the GPU supports Play ready SL3000.

But those are enforced via hardware backed keys.
I personally found that doing single foot tree poses in yoga can really get in there to strengthen your feet and ankles. If you really want to isolate the ankles band exercises are pretty useful. For foot stuff the majority of things I worked on was dexterity and proprioception. For example, spread all your toes apart, pull all your toes together, lift only your big toe, lift all your non big toes. For me I was missing the mind body connection to move me feet how I wanted to move them and regaining that took me time.

Another thing to consider is that sciatica can manifest in your feet depending on how the nerve is being pinched. It can be very confusing when your feet hurt but the source of hurt is not actually in your feet.

I hope for the best on your journey.
I definitely understand it. I have some really old blog posts with tutorials for a deprecated version of my software and I get a lot of people complaining about things not working based on those. I've had to add disclaimers to the most popular ones.
> public opinion (re-election)

No matter who is re-elected, there's a preset window for law & policy, which perhaps only public outrage (and opportunist politicians) can shift. Outrage is a high bar (may be perhaps outside of Twitter).
I'm not "glossing over" the Nakba. Firstly, we probably don't 100% agree on the exact events of the Nakba or the interpretation of them.

But more importantly, I'm not sure how actually relevant it is today. Israel was founded and for sure did some things that weren't great, just as the surrounding Arab countries did things that weren't great. Just as like 50% of the countries today have been through stuff that isn't great.

If no one can live in peace and a joint future because of things that happened in 1940, how is there any peace with Germany? With Japan? WW2 didn't just ethnically cleanse a lot of people - 50 million people died in that war. Yet there is peace, because people chose to stop fighting and figure out a way to coexist.

> It doesn’t make sense to “share the land” with people who ethically cleansed your family from said land.

For the sake of argument, let's assume your idea of what happened in the Nakba is spot on. What exactly is the alternative? What do you imagine should happen to the millions of Israelis that have been born and raised in Israel? If the land isn't "shared", what should happen?

This idea of trying to roll back the existence of countries is antithetical to the entire relatively-peaceful world order since 1945.

> You say that you represent “leftist Zionism” but such a thing doesn’t exist as evidenced by your argument against basic human rights.

Where did I argue against basic human rights?
Netflix's over-segmentation is the reason I ultimately stopped subscribing. You have to pay substantially more to get any of many screens, no ads, or 4K. As a single user who wants 4K, I then feel like I'm paying for something I don't need when the plan has many screens. None of the other big players like Amazon, YouTube, or Apple do this, all provide 4K to all subscribers and as far as I know only really segment by number of users, if they segment at all.
Any idea why there hasn’t been much if any enforcement from the FTC and co about the sketchy VPN review blogs? Seems like especially Lina Khan’s FTC would be interested to find a way, because giving the impression of an independent review and then adding a little “actually we’re extremely biased” disclaimer somewhere doesn’t seem like it should be acceptable. They might be offshore, but they do plenty of business with US creators.
It applies to much more than facebook though. For example, Tiktok, Youtube, Reddit, Instagram. Not sure why you want to single out Facebook.
I've found having a cascade of things helps. Trying to split things into "decision at this later, or pass on to the next" with increasingly complicated models/approaches.

Start with ifs, then svms then something else for example.

This has some technical benefits, like speed, and gives you a place to put important hard coded fixes for where a better model makes a small but key mistake. But the bigger benefit imo is getting something to solve the bulk of the problem quicker, and a organisationally it means not saying no to an approach - just where it fits and at what level of improvement it's worth it.
A significant portion according to the article, but, to be fair, not all of them, the article summarises some largely lone wolf bugfixing that's going on.
So the lesson is there is not a single good way to do science (or anything really), as whatever the approach retained, there will be human biases involved.

So the less brittle option obviously might be to go through all possible approaches, but this is obviously more resources demanding, plus we still have the issue of creating some synthesis of all the accumulated insights from various approaches which itself might be taken into various approaches. That’s more of a indefinitely deep spiral, under that perspective

An other perspective is to consider, what are the expected outcomes of the stakeholders maybe. A shiny academic career? An attempt to bring some enlightenment on deep cognitive patterns to the luckiest follows that have the resources at end to follow your high level intellectual gymnastic? A pursuit of ways to improve humanity condition through relevant and sound knowledge bodies? There are definitely many others.
The first time I didn't move at all (except for targeting), and before I knew it it was "solved". Just a few seconds.
Bypass of access restrictions of a private GitHub organization repo
>I used OpenAI to do the translation which looks pretty good for me, with the caveat that... well... I do not know Latin

OpenAI also does not know Latin. This is either a tool to troll people that can read Latin or a tool to help people “learn” a made up vaguely Latin-shaped set of gibberish that ChatGPT nondeterministically generated. This only works for a definition of “Latin” that is a sort of vibe wholly detached from structure, syntax, or vocabulary.
> The author is correct in that media DRM is tied to GPU vendors on the field right now ... hardware backed DRM can be so much more invasive

I expect mjg59 to know what they're talking about but like you say, I wonder the same thing about the strength of (what you call) Media DRM v Hardware-backed DRM.

GPU vendors have quietly deployed [hardware-based DRM] ... [which] works just fine on [boards] that [don't] have a TPM and will continue to do so.

Work fine? Even if a section of GPU's vRAM is out of the reach of the OS (here, to implement DRM), wouldn't TPM / DICE be needed to establish trust / measure GPU's firmware?
> but no one pathologizes Christianity when that happens

Many people, even many believers, certainly pathologize those that become too embroiled in Christian beliefs. Sure, they admire the deeply devout priest or nun or monk or who is spending their whole life in the Church. But if that person starts telling them that God is speaking to them, or that God is showing them far off events, or that they can pray to obtain physical results directly - they way this book suggests is possible - they will certainly take a few steps back and stop listening so intently.

Not to mention, there are vast differences between religious and occult practices. While religious people do sometimes pray for material improvements to their life, many religious practices are more moral or social rather than magical. People eat a certain way because they believe this is what they believe is the right thing to do, they help the poor or others in their communities, they worship their god or gods just because.

Wishing to live a good life because you believe that will guarantee you'll have a good after-life (i.e. religion in a nutshell) is extremely different from performing spells that you think will fix your life here and now (occult magical practices).
If this ends up succeeding then (why) wouldn't it mean companies could sue ad-blocker creators?
Is this article trying to imply that toilet seats are dirty, so they are a good comparison?

I mean, I can't talk for everyone, only for myself, but I don't shit'n'piss on my toilet seat. If it has any contamination, I clean it before I put my sensitive bare heinie on it.

Why not compare it with something that's actually dirty, like a toddler's hand after some involved play hour involving two dogs in the rainy forest?
The best article on the subject in English is maybe still Ernest Blum's "The New Old Way of Learning Languages" https://theamericanscholar.org/the-new-old-way-of-learning-l... but note that it's quite imperfect. For example, there's no mention of the fact that interlinears went mainstream in France in the century between Locke's efforts and Hamilton's. There's also a subreddit https://www.reddit.com/r/interlinear , but you may still have to message a mod to be allowed to post.
> Online, it was undermined by troll farms pulling the strings in favor of certain shady factions.

No, online it was undermined by selection effects. Where those who care the most about something are most likely to engage or post, leading to endless streams of unrepresentative and extreme views.
But how will that create value for shareholders?
> RAG in my experience usually requires a decent amount of customization

Like what? I'm curious because I just upload the documents to OpenAI and make it available to the Assistant, and it seems to work fine as a generic solution. Are they doing anything magical?
There's some intensive spoken Latin course in Rome, I remember reading about it at the time and it sounded totally immersive. It was a follow on from what Fr Foster had run previously (https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/father-reginald-foste...).

On my bucket list whenever I win the Powerball and can stop working full time
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platform_economy

Larger the Platform the more they can squeeze the seller, the buyer, the labor, the competition, the govt (don't prevent us growing or we shall...). And of course investors too, cause they are given the Bezos spiel - don't expect profit cause we are growing.

The problem is when every company starts attempting the same thing. Its quite funny watching CEO's on conference calls these days, cause literally everyone is who is having a hard time generating profit starts producing a story about how they are going to turn into middleman. Wall Street cheers them on.

One interesting experiment going on at changing this dynamic/trap is ONDC - https://resources.ondc.org/strategypaper (worth following)
People take this list and create e-books to charge at Kindle Store, so people unaware of the fact they are public end up wasting money away.
The real trouble with LLMs is that they emulate knowledge so well. People assume they can depend on it to know things, but it is not reliable at all. A lot of traps are being laid in code by people trusting the output or behavior of LLMs.
vaguely Latin-shaped set of gibberish that ChatGPT nondeterministically generated

OP hadn't used AI to generate Latin, but to generate English.
I had thought about excluding gov apps from the question. But ultimately curious about those as well. Thanks for answering!
Thoughtful.-

PS. Kind of like a sort of AI "intelectual debt" ...´

... that we might wholesale be accruing.-
But... but... C is 53 years old also, it is still rarely called out by its age
But then you can already use tpm as a business. No need to force it upon end users.
We need a tech hype that is not terminally tainted as an anti-human abomination. Is it too much to ask for? Surely those gazillions of GPUs can be deployed to do something actually useful? Are we beyond redemption?
DAC: An Innovative Prompting Technique to Enhance Mathematical Accuracy in LLMs
Thankfully, rust does give you that level of control, you can write your own doubly-linked list implementation if you want, and you can pick your safety-overhead tradeoff.
Or you can download a torrent and 4k just works always.
It’s funny to read he wants to not be lazy. Most of the art made under the Jeff Koons brand is made by assistants... his commentary on AI art is an art piece in and of itself.
At least they weren't logged into their banking apps.
I meant to say "Every regular website can have a service worker", but can't edit anymore
My FB timeline is already a complete mess with most irrelevant garbage as it stands. Not exactly sure what adding additional 'noise' is going to achieve outside of boosting numbers (which I guess is what they want).

A current snapshot my feed:

- Group post (from one I follow)
- Ad
- Post (from company I don't follow)
- Group post (from Group I don't follow)
- Group post (from one I follow)
- Ad
- Group post (from Group I don't follow)
- Group post (from Group I don't follow)
- Post (from person I don't follow)
- Group post (from Group I don't follow)
- Group post (from Group I don't follow)
- Group post (from Group I don't follow)
- Post (from person I don't follow)
- Group post (from Group I don't follow)
- Group post (from Group I don't follow)
- Group post (from one I follow)
- Group post (from Group I don't follow)
- Group post (from Group I don't follow)
- Group post (from one I follow)

I gave up writing the above, but it was about 9 more posts before I saw a post from a person I actually know.
KenobiDB: Small atomic document based database in pure Python
Few people decide between "security products" based on price, they do it mainly based on reputation. Buying that reputation through ads is expensive, so you can't go too low in price. Also, there are super low-cost VPNs out there, but they're a separate market segment and we don't usually hear about them because they don't have the money to advertise in large media outlets.
Deploying some sort of TPM remote attestation for DRM requires every component from every vendor to play nice, so I don't think you'll ever see that rolled out for Windows.

I would guess that the actual push for TPM is to have 'better' BitLocker, and Passkey support.

In practice the default BitLocker+TPM configuration isn't that great (no user entropy/pin, dTPM is basically worthless).

I have no actual understanding for how TPM is involved for Windows Hello/WebAuthn/Passkey or whatever, but at a glance it would seem Biometrics without a TEE seems like a very weak link.