skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
snip

"When a user says, 'Hey, ChatGPT, what happened at Davos today?' we would like to display content, link out to brands of places like the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal or any other great publication and say, 'Here's what happened today' and then we'd like to pay for that. We'd like to drive traffic for that," said Altman, adding it's not a priority to train models on that data, just display it.

In future, LLMs will be able to take smaller amounts of higher quality data during their training process and think harder about it and learn more.

When content is used for training, Altman said we need new economic models that would compensate content owners.
It says "Firefox(In progress)", and the original project this was forked from has it: https://github.com/lwthiker/curl-impersonate
How are you doing it? Asking because I wrote an open source project (see me ~shilling~ linking it elsewhere in this comment section) for doing this, but it sounds like you've maybe come up with an even faster way.
> I started using Linux five years ago, mainly because I couldn’t figure out how to get Python working on Windows

Windows being by far the most dominant operating system from 97-2015 definitely exacerbated a dearth in knowledge among the young. In the early days internet access was not ubiquitous and shipping an operating system without even a primitive programming environment definitely lead to missed years of programming for me.

I learned a lot about windows, lots of UIs and how the system was constructed somewhat, but no visual studio, no functioning compiler in base and the only interpreter being fucking batchfiles with no docs… come on…
Steam also runs on Chromebook; which is easily showing that this is a very shallow victory for Linux on the desktop as a platform.

If you can survive with Proton, LibreOffice, and GIMP; you can much more comfortably survive with Proton on ChromeOS, Google Docs, and Photopea. Just hating Windows is not enough of a reason to be a Linux user, and as long as that is the case, Linux will remain niche.
Arch is not for consumers, Arch is for people who think they are "power users" or something like that.
Have I ever got a bigger paycheck I'd donate to them without hesitation. It's because of them (and formerly Cyanogenmod) I got to have my Xperia Z1 for 7+ years, and now this Xperia 1ii for 4 years, each of them were/are doing great because of it.

Hope they keep going strong.
The reality is most people are well served by either Windows and/or macOS.

Both platforms have received billions of dollars in developpment by MS and Apple over the years and both have an extremely rich and mature app ecosystems. For most people, there's no real need or desire to use anything else.

That's it.

It's not an issue of drivers, games or app compatibility. If there were serious demand for Linux on the desktop, there would be good money to be made there and these issues would get fixed pronto.
I'm more interested to hear what your thoughts on the actual substance of my comment were.
If your table setup process starts to get slow like ours, checkout psql TEMPLATE (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/manage-ag-templatedb...). Do the setup once to a db with known name, then use it as the template when creating the db for each test.
do you have a link for your game? how was the release process?
A South American waterway becomes a cocaine superhighway – to Europe
Some discussions on previous iterations:

2022: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33951719

2021: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28960330

2020: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23368115

2018: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19241394

2016: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10812214
Those are the same goals, at least in a capitalistic free market. The theory is that consumers will go towards products which are better (meaning, less obnoxious), and therefore the obnoxious websites will either die off or give up the banners to conform to the market.

Naturally, as you can see, free markets are purely theoretical. In practice, up and leaving a website you're using is almost never easy, and isn't even a choice you can make often.
https://archive.ph/cKupi
Highly recommend the Samsung S5e Tablet with LineageOS. It’s an amazing tablet for comics and light reading. Hard to beat its high res AMOLED display, incredibly light weight, and decent enough specs (I haven’t personally seen slowdowns when using Lineage on a minimal install). Forgoing gapps gets you crazy standby time.

Couple things to note is it doesn’t have a headphone jack (it is legitimately that thin though) and you are required to use Windows to flash the device.
Yes, with Postgres at least you can do this by using a "template" database — run your migrations on it, then create new databases from that template. It's a very fast operation. For more information, read the Postgres docs:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/manage-ag-templatedb...
The other question is why should any normal person want to run Linux as their primary OS except for philosophical reasons?

I was forced to use Windows for a year as a developer. I threw WSL2 on it and it was fine. I installed Docker desktop for Windows and it worked fine for Linux.

But especially on the Mac, while I have to download updated commands, it is genuinely certified UNIX.

On both Macs and Windows I also get mainstream software support and on Macs, I get a laptop that can run 14-20 hours on a battery and runs cool and quiet.
Maybe I fell upwards. Maybe I earned it. Doesn't matter for the following:

I'm now on the side of the table where I frequently make personnel decisions: hire, promote, offer a new role, offer a new assignment, merit adjustment, expand a successful team, disband or merge an unsuccessful team into another, transfer in, transfer out, put on a PIP, etc. Most of the good things on that list go to people who demonstrate ability and results, and rarely do those results come without effort. Most of the bad things on that list go to people who demonstrate an inability to deliver results, which is sometimes related to a lack of effort.
Mentioned in a footnote in that book is the following, which I have always rather liked: "A science is said to be useful if its development tends to accentuate the existing inequalities in the distribution of wealth, or more directly promotes the destruction of human life."

(He mentions it in a footnote mostly to clarify that he doesn't really quite believe it -- it was a "conscious rhetorical flourish" in something he wrote in 1915, and in the main body of the text he gives a less cynical account of what it means for something to be useful.)
Vetoes are limited to very specific areas, and are often bypassed already even in those areas (because most practical decisions are actually not taken by the organisms where vetoes exist). Even the Hungarian government, which has stretched the interpretation of such definitions to the most awkward limit over the last decades, in practice falls in line pretty much all the time, using it as a bargain chip to ensure this or that subsidy keeps flowing. It's a desperate strategy anyway: like the Visegrad bloc's actions effectively prompted reforms to reduce their leverage, so will Hungary bring about new ways to further diminish even the current simulacra of veto.
It's definitely usable past 48GB, I have a 96GB M2 Max and regularly run models that use around 70GB that are very usable.

I also have a home server with 2x3090 and 2xA4000 (80GB vRAM) - yes it's a lot faster, but it's a pain in the ass to build, it takes up a lot of space, uses 10x the power, and honestly - cost about the same as my MacBook Pro.
Yes but many of the things that homeless people do is illegal in the eyes of the law, they just look the other way.
For the upper right quadrant, something like a Silicon Graphics might fit.
It's a meme.
Just google "china but at what cost"
There are probably hundreds of articles with the title at this point

China is getting smarter - but at what cost?
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50658538

China's wind industrial policy "succeeded" – but at what cost?
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/energysource/chinas-wi...

China Invests in Environment – but at What Cost?
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2018-04-...
Pipewire fixed audio issues for me. The font issues and general theming inconsistency remains.
Yeah, my bad - I'm so accustomed to pdfs that I forget people often like other formats. Thanks for the link!
I feel like Claude (or other LLMs) kind of solve this TBH. There's now an incredibly intelligent teacher built into the computer, who you can talk to and who will answer your questions. For getting started with basic web development it can take you a very long way.
I became an Iosevka convert this year. If there are things about it you don't like, you can likely build a custom variant that fixes those things. There are 54 variants for the zero character, for example. Pick your poison.
https://typeof.net/Iosevka/
It’s not hate it’s just not forcing society on someone who doesn’t want it.
Printing out your 2FA recovery keys and storing them in a safe also is.
> Replace "database mocks" with ANY <X> distributed API service calls in your execution flow and ...

so far so good - you're inviting the comparison of "use a real database" to "use a real X", where X could be anything - a bank, or a nuke.

> ... there's still ZERO excuse to NOT to be using SQLite or LocalStack mocks in your basic unit and pre-integration testing.

And I'm lost. Do we hope for a BankLite and NukeLite implementations to exist?
Why is maintaining dual DB implementations worth it? Like what is the tangible benefit of "my business logic remains generic"? Do you have to deploy the app in different environments with different DBs?
Reminds me of https://www.glideapps.com/
The article literally states that over 2,000 H1Bs were requested. There are numbers.
Dupe https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42545661
Which open source stacks work with Infineon CYW43439 (used on Pico w and Pico 2W)? I know about BTstack, but apparently NimBLE is not ported to this chip.

I'm also curious, of all the available BLE chips, which one has the "most sane" development environment? I had the misfortune of using the SiLabs BLE chips, and it seems like the Dev Environment was meant for Web dudes or something -- it seemed very foreign to me, an embedded guy. It was like 5 layers to go from their SDK down to the machine instruction that would set the value of a GPIO pin hi or lo. Confused documentation, spread out over dozens of not-related sections, weird configuration wizards, etc. Now, the Hardware seemed just fine, but gosh, the Dev Environment?

I've heard good things about Nordic's environment, but haven't used it. I also know nothing about TI's or AD's.

Opinions appreciated!
Relatedly: Kees's keynote on Linux security from a month ago was great: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orO8czP5Bxw
Well, back to my original point that the challenges are political in nature.

Nuclear has one of the lowest mortality rates per megawatt hour. It would be even better if only modern reactor designs were considered.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/494425/death-rate-worldw...
I suggest using real databases with testcontainers and dagger.
Methylchloroisothiazolinone, anyone? I did type it from memory so apologies if I got it wrong.

I've read the shampoo bottle way too many times.
I understand your claim though dont agree on several counts -

1. To start, if decentralization does not "solve the problem" then what do all AP platforms bring to the table? There was already a decentralized facebook before mastodon - it used to be called a "web site". You could get a feed with just what you wanted by subscribing to rss feeds, which were also decentralized. You were not tied to 140 characters per post either, and nothing stopped someone from making an rss client that clipped posts at 140 characters in the the feed or whatever. What problem does AP solve for me? Indexing all that content? The hosting? If the whole thing is about getting banned from the domain twitter.com, open your own domain and publish your content - problem solved.

2. If we're solving a solved problem, why not bring something new to the table? eg anonymity of nosr.

3. If "decentralization is not the solution", how come other protocols - eg mentioned above - claim (convincingly imho) to offer an actual improvement if not solution?

4. You claim "decentralization is not the solution" then define some ad hoc line in the sand regarding what is "decentralized" and then make some bold claims based on that. Decentralized could mean many things: could be like ssh keys, could be like gpg keys with directories and web of trust, could be like dns or certificate authorities. Could be like email. Like torrents or like i2p, or kad. All of these are slightly different.
Heck, could even mean like fb vs twitter - you are free to move to a different platform. Takeout your data, import contacts - done.

Where you claim that decentralization is not the answer i will say maybe insufficient decentralization is not the answer - with email, AP, and many other protocols, the platform ("domain") is the first class citizen so you get strong platforms and weak users. Regulation will help here just like it helped with banking - ie wont. What makes banks cooperate is mutual desire for profit.

Banks are truly fungible for the most part - make users first class and you will get the same for platforms
Syncing keys to OneDrive is optional, at least on the Pro versions of Windows.
If you give the person blasted out of their mind on drugs smearing feces everywhere a house, it’s just gonna be a feces smeared house. There’s a lot more investment required for someone like that.
The solution is the general populace becoming more tech literate, much like I became more literate in the yellow pages 20 years ago.

The reality is these are no longer mere tools, they are instruments for conducting life. They are a prerequisite to just about any activity, much like driving in the US.

We expect each and every citizen to have an intimate understanding of driving, including nuances, and an understanding of any and all traffic laws. And we expect them to do it in fractions of a second. Because that is the cost of utilizing those instruments to conduct life.
I would not be at all surprised if some "test mode" allows access to the I/Q signals. Do you have any friends at TI ?
> this hobbyist toy. Linux is fundamentally not ready for anyone who has needs more than a Chromebook

Wow, piss right off you to you, too.

Linux is ready for me, and has been for decades. By your logic, I need nothing but a Chromebook.

Linux is imperfect, like you, but it's never been an ass.
As https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recovery_of_funds_from_the_Mad... says, this is the percentage of money in that later came out. With no adjustment for, for instance, inflation.

94% recovery, correcting for inflation since 2008, is a 64% recovery. And that's the best case that you put money in at the last possible moment. If your money went into the scheme in 1994 instead, that's a lot more inflation that you got to suffer.

Not to mention the downside of not having access to your money for this long.

I'm sure that a 94% recovery took a Herculean effort. But people who bought into the scheme, still had large and very real losses.
People change, interests wander. The guy who made brainfuck wrote parts of the sauerbraten engine. Is that a betrayal of brainfuckery?
Not sure, and they’re dealing with fewer issues than Tesla which self drives all over the place. But their stance is more conservative, and Musk has more than a whiff of cowboy, over claiming etc. Less compatible with safety. I was a fan but less so over time. That’s my bias stated :)
I'm aware of iOS' APIs because of Strongbox (iOS Keepass-compatible client), and someone also mentioned that macOS Strongbox does the same thing just fine. That is interesting that in this case it seems specifically a 1Password choice/disinterest.
Related:

VW breach exposes location of 800k electric vehicles

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42524422
I mean it's maybe "seamless" if you use a system provided by the top DRM platform. Using wine directly it's unfortunately not very seamless. I don't really play games much but my recent experience hasn't been great.

Last week I tried to run Witcher 3 using wine and it took a while to debug. The installer runs immediately and seemlessly - but then it got messy

It involved installing `winetricks` which seems to be some service that installs a multitude of driver, libs and software through a clunky unresponsive UI. (not clear where it's being installed from, but #yolo) The necessary libraries I had to deduce from reading forum posts and the errors I got on launch. You then had to go in and make sure to launch the directx 11 version of the game (ie the .exe) buried in a hidden directory (~/.wine/)

Is this was "Platinum" means.. i don't want to image what Gold entails
That cost is amortized over all requests made against all copies of the model though. Fortunately we don't have to re-train the model every time we want to perform inference.
"Linux is not ready for the desktop" -- from a usability or technology point of view -- is an idea with zero fundamental merit and it's rather brain-rotty to look at what Linux can do on a desktop through this particular lens.

There are already many Linux "desktops."

A question with merit would be: How can we collectively best bring the advantages of Linux to broader audiences.
Notebookcheck is a poor source of parsing technical information.

The actual rumour from Kuo is that they’d move to a chiplet style design where the CPU tile and GPU tile are independent. This is actually in the article as linked.

That does not however mean that unified memory would go away. It’s just a new packaging system.
Could you share an example test (if it doesn't violate your privacy)? Your answer is too vague for me to understand. I can't square my experience of LLMs (generate braindead code for well-documented situations) with the kinds of tests I write (enforcing domain-specific business logic during execution of specific scenarios) about which LLMs know nothing (not the domain-specific logic, not the scenarios, not my test helpers and mock implementations.)
I’m a bit confused because you said two contradictory things: “the amount consumed keeps going up” and “there has to be a peak.”

Resource consumption goes up until it reaches a peak, then goes down. Generally, there are plenty of second peaks.
FT doesnt owe you a citation, or any explanation. It's a subscription newspaper, not a public resource. Just because someone linked to it on HN doesn't change that. If you feel that FT's reporting is insufficient, or unreliable, or lacks context, then go exercise a very simple remedy... don't read it. All your comments read as if FT owes you something, despite you not being the paper's target audience (or a paid subscriber).
Working for a vendor that ships Linux code, we find regressions all the time. Because we actually test things. We do try to be good citizens, and Linux is the right answer, but it isn't a false assertion on the part of the author at all.

In a previous job, 20 years ago, we found that the Linux USB stack was so bad that it was full of deadlocks and unprotected shared memory on 2.6. Just atrocious. And subsequent releases broke it again and again.

About 5 years after that, working for a different company, I had a well-known kernel developer tell me point blank that as long as we release our code to the kernel, they will "keep it working." When I probed what that meant, he genuinely saw no difference between "compiling" and "working."

There are various efforts to add testing/tests. Those are good. But we lost a lot when Solaris, Irix, etc. all died, and Linux has never quite gotten there, and I doubt it ever will.
Authoritarianism isn't cost for building this. The lacking need of progress in this field here is the answer.

Stubborn and rigid bureaucratic rules combined with unreasonably tought regulations are the reason why we are not able to innovate as fast as we could.
I’ve used Linux since 2011; I know all about it; and I would recommend it to nobody because the community can hear no criticism, bear no criticism, and self-rationalizes everything. Sometimes it takes a bold stance to make a point against one of the most toxic, delusional, and self-righteous communities online.

For my part, I’m back on Windows and Mac. Screw the community’s arrogance more than the project. The community, as even the comments here show, does not deserve a victory.
You could write this whole article with `s/cloud native//` and none of its meaning would change. Cloud native is meaningless.
One based indexing is also the one thing every beginners course has to hammer into people, as its so non-intuitive until you know about pointers.
Its not a small difference its up to 5x worse and there is no reason to believe Tesla drivers are worse in fact as with all expensive vehicles its population is liable to have fewer younger more dangerous drivers.

The logical conclusion is that the car is more dangerous with the obvious suspect being autopilot
Actually, you can wave it away as an exercise to the reader, you just need to be careful how you formulate it.

Something like 'Frobbing the fnutz might be NP-hard. The proof via reduction of SAT is left as an exercise for the reader.'

Not very reader friendly, but at least you haven't said anything wrong.
Another trending thread right now is Pegasus/Predator; as much as it may be a facade, to say MS (or any OS vendor) has no business working on security/secure computing is demonstrably false.
Oh, please.

Elon has literally been calling Americans lazy and explicitly calls out a desire for expanding H1B programs to replace American workers.

When he lays off thousands of workers and then requests over 2,000 H1Bs, it's simply bad faith to try to claim "Well, you can't prove the H1Bs are replacing the workers that got laid off!"

The Pyrrhonian Skeptic act of "WELL YOU DON'T KNOW FOR SURE" just makes you look foolish. It's obvious what's going on, and acting like you don't doesn't make you look smart.
The whole point is to offer sleeper accommodations. That requires more people to clean up/prepare the train for the next trip, but not (many) more for the actual operation while running. Although the goal is to get more people to take the train by making it more attractive as an option, the direct comparison is for the same number of passengers: take advantage of the flexible length of trains to provide a more compelling travel option, but with the same number of people. So no greater number of dining cars etc. -- unless you're pointing out that not everyone gets dinner on a regular trip, in which case sure, I guess.
OpenSolaris still lives in illumos:

https://illumos.org/
My focus was really the hardline individual right stance: I know people who left the NRA over that because they were sportsmen or retired military who thought it was quite reasonable to have civilian restrictions, especially mental / proficiency restrictions.
> they don't have the luxury of supporting a comparatively small set of hardware combinations like Apple has.

And even then, Apple has never been able to promise that you can keep the software features your computer shipped with across system updates. If a feature is removed, your only path of recourse is to treat your current patch like an LTS release.
NASA's Parker Solar Probe – 'Mission to Touch the Sun'
Of the two nncp uses transformers but isn't an LLM while ts_zip doesn't use transformers but is an LLM. Remember LLM just means large language model, it doesn't make any assumptions about how it's built. Similarly transformers just relate tokens according to attention, they don't make any assumptions those tokens must represent natural language.

I.e. anything you can tokenize can be wrangled using a transformer, not just language. Thankfully the same author also has a handy example of this: transformer based audio compression https://bellard.org/tsac/