skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You don't own "the piece", you have a copyright claim to the specific parts you contributed of the specific arrangement/transcription you produced for the duration of copyright. Someone else can take that original work and create their own transcription/arrangement that you would have no claim over. ContentID is unable to reliably distinguish these two.
I remember people doing this with PS5 when they were in short supply after release.
This will age like milk.
You can doubt all you want, but none of us really know, so maybe you could consider interpreting people's posts a bit more generously in 2025.
Irrelevant. All playbacks of the piece will be copyright-struck, regardless of the transcription used.
The amateurs at home are going to give the big companies what they want: an excuse for government regulation.
Coca‑Cola Paper Bottle: Sustainable Prototype Set to Trial in Europe
Quite an interesting rabbit hole to explore. Apparently OSI holds a US trademark for “Open Source Initiative Approved License”, but no trademark for “open source” by itself.
Sounds like they're basically making minimally plausible props for customers more focused on security theater performances than any actual security.

It's scummy and dumb but legally the only real problem I see is lying and collecting money under false pretenses making it fraud. Alternatively, they could have chosen to market these products confidentially as essentially security placebos. There's a market for things like fake security cameras, which arguably have some value for deterrence and reassurance. I suspect many of their current customers would probably have been just as happy buying these products knowing they didn't work.
Or ClosedAI.

Related https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42540862
Interesting perspective. In our case, we accepted a patch to effectively use a lock around a 64-bit integer as the workaround for these platforms, however.
No, it's likely that someone is trying to extract maximum profit from their IP library.
You write:

> 18. I hate that it doesn’t have types. It’s totally YOLO:

In the point where you say that you didn’t mention STRICT mode, which seems to directly address your complaint.
Indeed, it's like dumping rotting trash all over your garden and saying "Ha! Now Jehovah's witnesses won't come here anymore".
Capital letters are only useful as ECC, not direct signal. (You can't pronounce them, they aren't preserved in many contexts, the lay writer won't respect them, etc).

Your idea is like saying "Google" can be a trademark owned by Alphabet but "google" is just a verb. It seems like a cute linguistic hack but won't be meaningful in the public discourse.
I'm unclear why we are calling these a new class of life rather than just a new kind of virus. Their shape?
Where I live there are mri strip mall spots where you can just walk in. Same with dialysis.
I understand your concerns.

For me though, this would be all upside because I have largely explored technical topics with language models that would only be impressive to an employer.

At this point, it is like asking what does someone use a computer for? The use cases are so varied.

I can see how it would be interesting for myself to setup a local model just for the fun of setting it up. When it comes down to it for me though it is just so much easier to pay $20 a month for Sonnet that it isn't even close or really a decision point.
No, that is a fair take. It's just not what you seemed to have been discussing before.
Even vertically integrated hospitals, insurances and pharmacies still suffer from the cost issue, so I think a large portion of the problem is more fundamental.

I think a substantial part comes from low risk tolerance and opting for high quality low volume care
Nginx, it's nothing special it's just my load balancer.

if ($http_user_agent ~* (list|of|case|insensitive|things|to|block)) {return 403;}
Technically speaking, a good majority of SteamOS is just Arch with a bunch of FOSS software on top making Steam work its magic. There's nothing stopping someone from developing a copy that's open to much more hardware.

Though I do wish that they tested something like Fedora or Ubuntu as a benchmark.
Of course, but I'd rather not share it for obvious reasons. It is a nonsensical biography of a non-existing person.
Well, wouldn't this bias happen a while ago, to the very primitive organisms? Because the organisms we see today seem to universally want to live. I mean, even if we somehow mislabeled some more fundamental property, on the face of it, it seems to be pretty consistent. Everything about how these organisms are built is indicative of their "will" to remain functional and to procreate. Eg. regrowing parts of organism's body in order to overcome damage (that would cause the organism to cease to exist) seems pretty universal. Similarly, trying to move away from hostile environments seems to be pretty built-in feature of anything alive.
One tangentially related example is Tic Tacs, which contain 94.5% sugar[0] but can legally advertise as "0 sugar" because the serving size is less than 0.5 grams under FDA labeling rules.[1] [2]

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tic_Tac

[1] https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFR...

[2] https://i.imgur.com/9p6dMgD.jpg
Can't every webserver crash due to being overloaded? There's an upper limit to performance of everything. My website is a hobby and has a budget of $4/mo budget VPS.

Perhaps I'm saying crash and you're interpreting that as a bug but really it's just an OOM issue cause of too many in-flight requests. IDK, I don't care enough to handle serving my website at Facebook's scale.
> if demand is greater than supply you must ration the supply somehow.

This is logic of post-2008 fail-capitalism instead of 1970’s and China’s aspirational, problem solving capitalism.

You don’t address shortages of healthcare, housing or food with an elegant and fair system to decide who starves and dies.

You expand supply to make sure no one has to. You examine supply chain and figure out the bottlenecks.

For example China has started mass producing MRI machines, that’s one way you adress a problem.
“I hate what the sugar lobby has done to our country but damnit I’ll come out swinging against anyone coming after our corn farmers’ subsidies!”

- a reasonable misunderstanding to have when people speak the way you’re suggesting
Wilful ignorance is generally enough.
That's the point. It should still be considered open source.
You are missing the point: if they have fewer rights, they are cheaper in the long run.
1. Off topic

2. GitHub already does this. https://i.imgur.com/yAfwWGs.png
You can do that in your own custom completion.
Yeah, that's my thought as well.
Backend server's source code is now located at https://github.com/vednig/x-api ,currently the script waits for complete page to load and then extracts info to send out a response.

Since each new request takes high time and processing power, it was only logical to store responses and cache them for timely usage.

There's also a bit of a workaround required to get videos from X.com as they only load their direct URL when focused hence parsing html couldn't work, so I had to log network traffic to ensure I get their HLS links too.
> Either private insurance companies aren't interested in lowering costs

They aren't. Since their profits are capped at 20%, reducing costs means reducing profit as well, so they are actually incentivised to keep costs high.

> their claims process is so arduous that providers demand higher rates to deal with the high rate of denials and ever changing minutiae.

I think this is also the case
I'm always curious how poisoning attacks could work. Like, suppose that you were able to get enough human users to produce poisoned content. This poisoned content would be human written and not just garbage, and would contain flawed reasoning, misjudgments, lapses of reasoning, unrealistic premises, etc.

Like, I've asked ChatGPT certain questions where I know the online sources are limited and it would seem that from a few datapoints it can come up with a coherent answer. Imagine attacks where people would publish code misusing libraries. With certain libraries you could easily outnumber real data with poisoned data.
Looks like maybe the stats were added later in an edit, as I didn't see them. Comparing stats from separate countries is terrible. This has no control for any of the other possible factors associated. Those aren't studies, but just random stats. I at least offered a study. I didn't offer any "flak", but a starting point for you with a source.
What specifically are you suggesting? Is this a project that already exists or a theory of yours?
If it doesn't say it's a bot and it doesn't come from a corporate IP it doesn't mean it's NOT a bot and not run by some "AI" company.
Ban evasion for me, but not for thee.
> something that few Silicon Valley VC-backed companies really worry about

Is that actually true?
This is a new twist on the Dead Internet Theory I hadn’t thought of.
Here is a YouTube video of PaBoCo which makes the bottles (mostly paper but with HDPE liner). https://youtu.be/i2f2OrRpFjY
The linked article explains what happens when you block their IP.
I can't speak for Denmark, but I can speak for New Zealand, which has similar spend, and similar results (compared to the US). I wrote a thesis about healthcare software in uni, but as part of that I interviewed a bunch of people across the NZ healthcare industry, and learnt a lot about it.

A big efficency for NZ is 'pharmac', which is essentially a country-wide medicine subsidizer, and supplier. It's a government entity which figures out how much of a certain drug the entire country will need for say a month, then goes and buys it, in bulk on the international market. Making such a large purchase gives them really good bargining power, and they'll buy generic versions. Not all drugs are pharmac covered, but most are. It means there's not much profit margin for drug supply in the system.

The system is setup into 'district health boards'. Their job is to manage the health of everyone in a geographic area, and this means both in hospitals, and in primary care (your local doctors office). Because of this, they see the cost of their entire system, and are incentivised to optimise the care overall, as opposed to say a private hospital, and a private doctors office optimising their individual businesses.

One way this manifests, is putting a big focus on getting people to go to primary care, instead of hospitals. Hospitals are the most expensive thing in the system turns out, so they'd much perfer people get to a primary care doctor sooner, before something becomes an issue that requires hospitalization. So they're incentivised to keep doctors visits cheap, and accessible. This comes into play quite a lot with elderly care, they make up a huge amount of primary care visits - but if they don't become hospital visits, that's great.

You mentioned drug use. That's an interesting one as that's a government-wide issue, not just a healthcare issue. It affects poverty, education, emergency housing, the economy as a whole. There's been a big focus on public education, and actually ad campaigns about tabacco and alcahol, trying to make them seem really un-cool. And it's sort of been working, smoking rates are down, I'm not sure about vaping rates though. Meth is a big issue in NZ, but opiate/painkiller abuse is uncommon (compared to the US).

One general point though, is there's not much profit oppertunity for companies in the system. As the majority of money comes from the government, the funding is very standardized. Running a doctors clinic or say a pharmacy is just like running a small business, with the same oppertunities. There just isn't huge 'startup' oppertunities to find a killer product and turn a huge profit. Profit isn't taken at every point of the supply chain in care.

NZ's system has flaws, but overall I'm really pleased with it, and glad that we have it.
Show HN: I put a face on a 'button' that reacts to your cursor's distance
Inspired by a gamedev presentation called 'Juice it or lose it', I put a face on a 'button' that gets happier the closer your cursor is.

Maybe your website needs one too? Take a look at the source and have at it.
Versus constantly defending against Russia and China efforts to cut a cable, potentially for years? Agree it is technically challenging, but if the Baltics intend to rely on the cable after severing from Russia in February 2025, they’ll have to do better to defend this critical power infrastructure.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42509223

https://europacable.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Introducti... (Start at page 13)
They wouldn't, but people would create these increasingly tortured analogies out of the same motivations that other creative people would create, say, a raytracer in Brainfuck or a pregnancy test that can run DOOM.
> Who is it being done “for” if not for the people who play this game?

Many changes to media franchises and games are being made in an effort to attract a new audience, or with the belief that it increases appeal to the "modern audience". Emphasis because this is the buzzword phrase that gets used quite a lot to justify changes that are generating some amount of controversy or negative attention. The problem is that "modern audiences" may not actually exist
Very true. To paraphrase a saying, CPU amateurs argue about micro-benchmarks on HN, the pros simulate real code.
What a hot steaming load of White Supremacist Bullshit.
Most people know the overall system sucks, but they also think their insurance is mostly fine because they haven't had to use it very much (which is simply definitional, 80% of costs come from 20% of people). And so people fear the unknown. They would like something better but fear giving up what they have right now for something they haven't experienced. It is also a deeply personal issue, and has so many entrenched interests. Health care spending is 1/3 of our economy.
> That's a school shooting.

Ah. I now understand why school shooting numbers that people are quoting are so very high as of late.

Shit like Columbine is a school shooting. Shit like that is a shooting that happened to happen at school. If the assailant had used a knife, would you be calling it a "school stabbing"? If you would, then I disagree with that characterization, too.

For lots of folks, the term "school shooting" is strongly associated with the notion that a massacre happened... and not at all with the notion that some folks got into a heated argument, and one of them decided to attack the other with a weapon.
I interpreted it to mean that a hidden page (linked as u describe) is indexed in Bing or that some "facts" written on a hidden page are regurgitated by ChatGPT.
Join me in into that club, thinkpad without trackpoint no thanks.
I know what a honeypot is, but the question is how the know the scraped data was actually used to train llms. I wondered whether they discovered or verified that by getting the llm to regurgitate content from the honeypot.
Yeah we're not going to stop the state level intelligence services from using these. I'm more concerned about locking out and crimilising the non-state actors and holding the companies libel for their actions.

I think there could be some movement here, but there is certainly a level of protection that national governments are doing for these companies because they want their services.
Maybe, but impact can also make a pretty viable case.

For instance, if you own a home you may have an easement on part of your property that grants other cars from your neighborhood access to pass through it rather than going the long way around.

If Amazon were to build a warehouse on one side of the neighborhood, however, it's not obvious that they would be equally legally justified to send their whole fleet back and forth across it every day, even though their intent is certainly not to cause you any discomfort at all.
Is there a crowd-sourced list of IPs of known bots? I would say there is an interest for it, and it is not unlike a crowd-source ad blocking list in the end.
LLMs are absolutely being used in medical transcribing. A doctor I know was just raving to me about Epic's new system. Now instead of staring at the computer during the whole appointment he has the epic LLM fill out the report from his notes and does brief editing which allows more face to face time.
txtai automatically builds graphs using vector similarly as data is loaded. Another option is to use something like GLiNER and create entities on the fly. And then create relationships between those entities and/or documents. Or you can do both.

https://neuml.hashnode.dev/advanced-rag-with-graph-path-trav...
To the limits of where our understanding of how "entities" are connected to one another (homology). Yes, there's nothing like them. You could make an argument they are "viroid-like" and there's a deeper evolutionary connection between viroids/viruses/plasmids, but the information theory to formally establish such a connection is not sufficiently developed. It's a worthy scientific problem!

Is it common to find new viruses/viroids/biological agents? Well it certainly is starting to feel that way to me.
This is it exactly. All of the serious people left before they finished the sales pitch. If they had sold one to someone competent that would be grounds for a lawsuit or fraud charges. They had to filter out the customer base to just two kinds of buyers:

1. The people who fail to realize that it's a big scam and will be fat dumb and happy forever.

2. The people who don't want something functional, they want a "probable cause" generator they can pull out when there isn't any evidence to go on.
The Banality of Evil.

Everyone has to pay bills, and satisfy the boss.
> Cloudflare also has a feature to block known AI bots and even suspected AI bots

In addition to other crushing internet risks, add wrongly blacklisted as a bot to the list.
I have a large forum with millions of posts that is frequently crawled and LLMs know a lot about it. It’s surprising how ChatGPT and company know about the history of the forum and pretty cool.

But I also feel like it’s a fun opportunity to be a little mischievous and try to add some text to old pages that can sway LLMs somehow. Like a unique word.

Any ideas?
> We're talking about playing a boardgame with friends, do we really need to have a trigger-warning session?

First, it's not a "boardgame." It's a Role Playing Game. It's much more unbounded than a board game and you are actually playing. Not just rolling dice but acting and imagining and adding to the experience. You play your character and you decide how that character acts.

> do we really need to have a trigger-warning session?

You could have one. Generally cover strong NOs and decide on hot-topics that often make people uncomfortable:

racism/slavery, romance/sex, phobias, etc.

Then setup a system to halt if anything new comes up.

People throw around "trigger" and "safe-space" like they're above feeling anything but sometimes it's just being considerate. It's not just about language but situations.

We play D&D to have fun. For some, that means "leaving politics out of it" but for others, those "politics" impact our actual daily lives. To pretend they don't exist or to have to interact with them in a game can be just as un-fun.

> And when does that end? Every time I hang out with my friends should we update our daily list of no-no words first?

Now you're being facetious. You communicate like people. That's it.

If someone was recently mugged in real-life, you probably wouldn't have their character get attacked by a rogue. If someone had arachnophobia, you probably wouldn't drop down the RPG-cliche giant spider. If someone has to deal with real-life racism, you could probably understand why "knife-ears" wouldn't feel fun. OR maybe they're all okay. It's all about opt: opt-in and opt-out.

> oupled with that we are increasingly unable to fluidly deal with differences this creates as they arise.

I think that's a YOU-issue. My friend group is a complex group of people, and yet we find a way to have fun every week with D&D while also respecting all members of the game.
So basically this study is “we looked at various publicly available data sets of information, and here is a thing we notice that has previously gone unnoticed”.

The noticed it in multiple datasets.

What would replication look like here besides someone else looking at the dataset and agreeing that they also see the curiosities?

Or do you mean someone measuring a new fresh set of data and looking at it?

Asking for replication in this case is surprising, because seemingly the entire value is to prompt other research to go figure out what’s going on with these things.
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Open Science in AI: A Replication Study
Somehow the first time I see such pop up in my feed. Glad that someone (judging by the comments that is not the only one project) is working on this, of course I am rather far from the field but to me this feels like a step in the right direction for advancing AI past the hyperadvanced parrot stage that is the current "AI" is (at least per my perception).
But there'd be a finite number of ways to transcribe a piece. This someone would be able to claim the only ways to faithfully play the original public domain piece.
Why would I trust what Denmark does? This was Denmark's Minister of Health, a severely obese woman: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maggie_De_Block
Unless they're a big company in which case they can DMCA anything they want, and they get the benefit of the doubt.
No that's just assuming the 70%+ case "average part of the bell curve" where a user switching iOS to Android already has a Windows machine somewhere. Remove the install step of the Apple Passwords app in the rarer case that the user has a Mac or iPad as their primary "other device".

(If the hypothetical user was using Linux machines already by that point, they wouldn't have been using iOS Keychain for their Passkeys in the first place and probably would have the necessary skills or tech guru friend to load up Apple Passwords in a WINE session or in a Windows VM/dual boot.)

All else fails, there's always most sites will continue to (forever) fallback to email-based recovery because we should all face it that email accounts have been the average user's primary password manager for decades anyway.
That sounds like a good way to waste enormous amounts of energy that's already being expended by legitimate LLM users.
nothing happens on my Samsung with that code
...and you just described why this is not ready for prime time. Managing a number of physical devices tied to completely opaque secrets stored by unclear providers in places you never see, with hidden agendas promoting their locked-in solution over all others and complicating everything out of one ecosystem.

Most standard users will either mess up royally or run away scared. Damn, I've been on this field for 30 years, I've been using 4 OSs, 5 different browsers and devices from every ecosystem, and I still find this whole thing too much of a hassle.

And yes, I do have a backup passkey. Even though I had to convince my skip-level that it made sense. I just find it all too complex to adopt it broadly.
Ask HN: What do you think about the Blind app?
A platform where people seek validation based on TC and NW rather than quality opinions.
Build vs. Buy in the AI Era: A New Framework for Modern Tech Decisions
>Note: I don't want FB to have my data. I also don't want Apple to have those powers enumerated above.

In an ideal world that would be great. However, right now it is either Apple of Google when it comes to smart devices for average consumers. Kinda like political dichotomy in US politics.

Democracy will not function with an educated public. And dumbing down choices are just a way to get give power to megacorp and political institutions.