skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’s actually an open discussion in journalism ethics.

Many news organizations won’t name juveniles even in jurisdictions where it is allowed.

Other guides will be based on the nature of the crime.

Most wire services for instance now don’t name suspects for “minor crimes”. Here is the ap announcement on the topic: https://www.ap.org/the-definitive-source/behind-the-news/why...

Note that their argument tends to be around the biasing impact on the persons life. As they are unlikely to follow up on the criminal outcome there won’t be a chance to clear the persons name.

In this case I think Krebs is on solid ground as it’s a) not a minor crime b) he can later follow up.

But it’s certainly not an area that is black & white.
concentrated solar uses steam
Building a World of Warcraft Server in Elixir: 2024 Update
So why aren't US and allies demonstrably replicating EVs (and other kinds of green technology) quickly? Tesla is still pretty much the only serious player. Why are CEOs of major western carmakers painting a very different picture than what you describe here? Where are the serious EU/US battery makers that are globally competitive? It looks to me like the EU has chosen the worst of all options: put up tarriff barriers while also not having serious domestic EV makers, and also not stimulating domestic EV development.
A Steve Jobs Christmas [video]
In 2024, zoonotic origin is considered more probable, but it is by no means a "baseless conspiracy" to believe otherwise.
You're right about Bell-LaPadula, but note that model isn't used as much as the Biba model, the basis of Windows UAP. Even "solved" problems tend to evolve or get superceded over time; nothing seems to stay solved for long!
For one, it's not a "comprehensive toolset" (focus on toolSET) - it's one tool with one config option.
Asking "stupid" questions without fear of judgement is legit one of my favorite personal applications of LLMs.
> AI did help me frame it because I am an average write at best.

But what the AI generated is also average at best, and it also stripped your voice from the story.
The attack is known since 2022.

https://github.com/dansarie/halfloop/

https://tches.iacr.org/index.php/ToSC/article/view/9856
Remastered for dreamcast? Right..

They didn't even bother to release san Andreas for the Oculus quest after promoting it. And the remaster was really bad quality.
> Not standardized.

> Dependency soup.

Exactly why I don't use it. I don't really feel like including the source for the entire toolchain as part of my project and building it all myself. At least if I write standards conforming C++ there are multiple compiler implementations that can all handle it. I also have a reasonable expectation that a few decades from now I will be able to `apt get somecompiler` and the code will still just work (aside from any API changes at the OS level, for which compatibility shims will almost certainly exist).

If I can't build something starting from a repo in a network isolated environment then I want absolutely nothing to do with it. (Emscripten I am looking at you. I will not be downloading sketchy binary blobs from cloud storage to "build from source" that is not a source build that is binary distribution you liars.)
Ok so if you have a problem and the developer thinks that the solution to it is to add an API, all they have to do to get their way is to say "let's just add an API!", although they would of course be the one that had to make it work.

Yes I like this rule, how many things I could have solved at the worst run place I ever worked at if it had been implemented there. Although I guess the management might not have liked that essentially I could choose what got done and what I got to work on just by running my big mouth.

facetiousness aside, I'm trying to point out that most often when people say "let's just" it is because they are advocating a course of action and that rule won't work unless the course they are advocating gets chosen. If they say "let's just make an api" and you say no we're doing a UI and you will work on it because you used the word "Just" I guess that's a way to lose your tech talent relatively quickly.
> Yet businesses still push native apps as if it’s 2010, and we’re left downloading apps for things that should just work on the web.

The app icon acts as free marketing. If it were just a website, you wouldn't have a little picture of their logo on your phone to be reminded that they exist every now and then. They know that it could just be a website (usually it IS just a website, packed inside an "app"), but they don't want that for a reason.
Link to the point maps?
This phenomenon is called Alpha Decay. As more market participants exploit the predictor's advantage, the edge diminishes until it disappears.
> While you're definitely right about it having a steep learning curve, it's also true that not many RAW editors do what Darktable does.

If a Darktable developer happens to read this, I'd suggest looking at Nitro¹ for inspiration. I use it with Photos, and although Nitro doesn't need Photos (i.e. it can work directly with the filesystem), it's a good way to experience both "easy" and user-friendly "expert" paths.

¹https://www.gentlemencoders.com/nitro-for-macos/, the spiritual successor to Aperature by the former lead of Aperture, Photos, and related digital imaging technologies.
The parallel is that there are rich and poor? It is unscrupulous to argue in imprecise, binary terms while ignoring the difference in scale. People in flyover states are not making only $400/mo or even occupying that same societal equivalent of China in America.
John Keats,
Osamu Tezuka,
Somerset Maugham, Hector Berlioz.

Studied medicine but did not practice (Keats did for a little while). Just for interest.
Hard agree on all that.

And to be honest, none of these things solve the actual issue which is tons of these apps are software that is built by companies who do not build good software, and no framework or methodology is going to overcome that fact.

My banking app, Chase, is terrific. It is either native or such a well optimized web wrapped one that I can't tell the difference, which would be a first-of-kind. It has quirks but for every daily driver task I need, it's great. In fact the app being so good was actually part of why I decided to pull the trigger on changing banks, because my last was anything but.

That said, other apps I use (and websites, for that matter) are TRASH on mobile. Slow to load, slow to respond, and make my damn phone hot in my hand while I try and use them. And like, maybe they'd be better running native code, from a technical perspective at least, but that doesn't change that the usability is still awful, which is not a technical problem: it's a design problem, that probably originated far above the heads of any of the developers actually building them.
police using photos/location to figure out that a woman from Texas went to an address associated with an abortion clinic, and wow Texas has bounties, noooo potential for abuse there.

you've really been shilling apple and even obnoxiously giving multiple replies to the same comment, what's your problem?
> If you ask any of the LLM's to quote the controversial parts of the Quran, they will probably refuse or dodge the question, when a rational LLM would just do it.

Have you actually tried?

https://chatgpt.com/share/67747021-3ac8-800e-bc5d-f4a1acf903...
> The need to remove the capability was informed by the complex security and privacy concerns associated with web apps to support alternative browser engines that would require building a new integration architecture that does not currently exist in iOS and iPadOS.

This rationalization makes zero sense, it's just opening a standalone browser window from a convenient icon shortcut. They could even ignore the manifest.json entirely like Android does half the time anyway cause the implementation is buggy as all hell.

I think the real reason was some kind of retaliation worthy of a baby insanity wolf meme because they were forced to stop reskinning Safari for all other browsers on iOS which was absolutely ridiculous in the first place.
Why do you postulate that "most people don't have" this need? I also use AI non-stop throughout my day for similar uses.

This feels identical to when I was an early "smart phone" user w/my palm pilot. People would condescend saying they didn't understand why I was "on it all the time". A decade or two later, I'm the one trying to get others to put down their phones during meetings.

My take? Those who aren't using AI continually currently are simply later adopters of AI. Give it a few years - or at most a decade - and the idea of NOT asking 100+ AI queries per day (or per hour) will seem positively quaint.
If you're US based, there is no major exchange support. BITI ETF and SETH ETF for shorting BTC and ETH.

If you're non-US: Binance.
There is some very limited value in copying a successful strategy. Once enough market participants follow along, the strategy starts to fail. Markets are erratic because of that dynamic.
If that’s all you were doing, then maybe, but it never is. ORMs enable people who have no idea how RDBMS works to use them, which rarely ends well.

I’m not suggesting that to use RDBMS you should know how to administrate and tune it (though it helps), but knowing their language, and understanding a single data structure (B+ trees) isn’t too much to ask, I think.
Thank you for doing this work, though.

My first stab at trying ChatGPT last year was asking it to write some Rust code to do audio processing. It was not a happy experience. I stepped back and didn't play with LLMs at all for a while after that. Reading your posts has helped me keep tabs on the state of the art and decide to jump back in (though with different/easier problems this time).
Bitcoin Core Contributors
I feel like trying to get to an airport in NYC isn't representative of a typical trip, anyway. Especially given how far away La Guardia and JFK are from everything else - sometimes, including public transit.
What can you learn from something parroting data we already have?

Similarly, we are now finding that training on synthetic data is not helpful.

What would have happened if we invested 1/100 of what we spent on LLM on the rule based approach?
At the risk of sounding impolite or critical of your personal choices: this, right here, is the problem!

You don’t understand how medicine works, at any level.

Yet you turn to a machine for advice, and take it at face value.

I say these things confidently, because I do understand medicine well enough to not to seek my own answers. Recently I went to a doctor for a serious condition and every notion I had was wrong. Provably wrong!

I see the same behaviour in junior developers that simply copy-paste in whatever they see in StackOverflow or whatever they got out of ChatGPT with a terrible prompt, no context, and no understanding on their part of the suitability of the answer.

This is why I and many others still consider AIs mostly useless. The human in the loop is still the critical element. Replace the human with someone that thinks that powdered rhino horn will give them erections, and the utility of the AI drops to near zero. Worse, it can multiply bad tendencies and bad ideas.

I’m sure someone somewhere is asking DeepSeek how best to get endangered animals parts on the black market.
I think you misunderstand what most people want out of job. Like I said, I’ve had 10 jobs. All of them were targeted because they had money and I needed to exchange labor for some of their money.

I didn’t have “passion” about any of them. I “wanted the job” because they had money. The only evaluation I cared about was was would I get paid on time.

I’m exaggerating slightly. I did care about other things. But I wasn’t desperate like many people are in today’s market. That is the attitude I would have if it came to that.

No one reads cover letters by the way. They barely read resumes.
same, but :%s/undefined/trading.snagra.com/ did the trick
> Sure, then after 2 or 3 days it pops up again.

Citations needed. Doesn't happen to anyone else but you.

> Oh, too bad, You should turn it on, I will remind you in a few days. > 3 days, 5 days Oh, Sorry, never is NOT an option.

Again 5 minutes of Googling disables it.

> On Windows, You don't even know where your apps configurations are.

In Linux they can be in a dozen of different locations as well. And Gnome even has (had?) a sort of registry.

> What?! Gnome has excellent application search, Win + one or two key presses I can launch my app, and it's actually consistent. No ads inserted randomly to interrupt my muscle memory.

"I use Gnome/KDE and I don't give a damn about all other DEs."

Got it!

> How can one excuse the mess of going to each application's website, download binaries and install, and then let each and every app phone home to check for update, and then go through the upgrade dialogs, keeping watch if the app has inserted any search box or toolbar opt-outs? That is just absurd! I can just run `yay -S --noconfirm` and put password, and my update kicks in. Most of the apps are not bothered if I am running their latest version or not.

Most serious Windows software doesn't need manual updates. Windows and MS Office update themselves. Adobe, Corel and 3dMax products do so as well. Tiny utilities? Who cares? They just work.

It's Linux where people get obsessed with updates because there's no API/ABI compatibility per se and you have no choice. In Windows? Run something from 20 years ago and don't bother.

> Because, again, it's only feeding on the legacy, and because people pay the Windows Tax,

$10 tax. Yeah. I've spent hundreds of hours fixing Linux. No tax at all.

> I am not riddled by any of those 'bugs' and 'regressions', funny thing is, sometimes there are minor hitches, but again, they are minor.

Anecdotal evidence rears its ugly head AGAIN AGAIN AND AGAIN.
"If it works me for Linux is perfect". Never mind people who actually do the dirty work of fixing hundreds of regressions every Linux kernel release.

Nothing ever changes with the Linux cult. "It works for me, I'm a seasoned developer, I know my way around console, Linux must work for everyone".

Even in this discussion this has been repeated ad nauseam.

F it. I'm out.
Windows UAP is a horrible thing. It would be far better to just replace the system dialog boxes like file open, save, etc. with power boxes that then give file capabilities to applications.

It would be minimal work to refactor applications, and provide almost perfect security with no UX change.
On a more long term basis, the stock market reflects the business reality. But in the short term, it's chaos.
My yocto linux builds have a single entry point that is a build.sh. And they’re like 20 lines.
I've been trying for about 2 years now. I've had 1 commercial success, but it was pure luck really. I had a post about my project go viral, and it gained many users. It was a free product, but a group of people wanted to buy it off me.

I think its

- right market
- right time
- right product
- right attitude

Consider though that selling to other developers is really, really hard. There is no low hanging fruit anymore.

Rather than building web projects, I'm not shifting my attention to overlooked areas (C, CLI, other low level areas)
THIS. And adding to it, most people really do not like being told that they aren’t as clever as AWS or Google.
When I'm done working, chased my children to properly finish their dinner, helped my son with homework, and putting them to bed, it's already 9+ PM — the only time of the day when I have free time. Just which human besides my wife can I talk to at that point? What if she doesn't have a clue either? All the professionals are only open when I'm working. A lot of the issues happen during the weekend, when professionals are closed. I don't want to disturb friends during the evening, and it's not like they have the expertise I need anyway.

LLMs are infinitely patient, don't think I am dumb for asking certain things, consider all the information I feed them, are available whenever I need them, have a wide range of expertise, and are dirt cheap compared to professionals.

That they might hallucinate is not a blocker most of the time. If the information I require is critical, I can always double check with my own research or with professionals (in which case the LLM has already primed me with a basic mental model so that I can ask quick, short, targeted questions, which saves the both of us time, and me money). For everything else (such as my curiocity on why TCM works, or the correct spelling of a word), LLMs are good enough.
>This paper shows that the main grid in the world’s fifth-largest economy was able to provide more than 100% of the electricity that it used from only four clean renewable sources: solar, wind, hydroelectric, and geothermal, for anywhere from five minutes to over 10 hours per day for 98 out of 116 days during late winter, all of spring, and early summer, as well as for 132 days during the entire year of 2024, without its grid failing.

The title of the article, and the initial framing, is not what most people would interpret as the meaning on their first read.

The title makes it sound like California ran on 100% renewables for 98 days, but it ran on 100% renewables for small chunks of time (as low as 5 minutes) over 98 non-consecutive scattered days.
I wouldn't exactly call this censorship. I even got a list of articles from it:

https://chatgpt.com/share/67747121-09e8-800e-892a-dee466e8fe...
Can you do a blog about the goals of your project in terms of tech-archaeology? Fascinating topic
> The fix was pretty straightforward: instead of using QueueUserAPC(), we now create a loopback socket to which we send a byte any time we need to interrupt select().

This is an absolutely standard trick that is known as "the self-pipe trick". I believe DJB created and named it. It is used for turning APIs not based on file handles/descriptors into events for an event loop based on file handles/descriptors, especially for turning signals into events for select(2)/poll(2)/epoll/kqueue/...
Exactly like how Microsoft "backed off" Recall. Uuuuuntil they shoved it back in and made it undeleteable.
Election Fraud? Nope, just bad math (2020)
I would be very cautious about doing this with money you actually need. Even the best performing human day traders underperform the indexes over long time horizons. Why would a robot be better?

from a study in Brazil: "97% of all individuals who persisted for more than 300 days lost money. Only 1.1% earned more than the Brazilian minimum wage and only 0.5% earned more than the initial salary of a bank teller — all with great risk."

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3423101

If you don't want your bot to be a day trader, then just get low cost index funds.
> dumb technologies that US and allies can replicate fairly quickly

Laugh in Northvolt

> $150B on it since 2014, and has only come up with low yield/unprofitable 7nm via existing DUV machines

Considering that there are less than 5 countries on Earth that can fab 7nm semiconductors, that aint bad.
noexcept doesn’t prevent any throws at compile-time, it basically just wraps the function in a `catch(...)` block that will call std::terminate, like a failed assert. IMHO it is a stupid feature for this very confusion.
technically just tokyo

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42501102
Thanks, but perhaps I should have been more clear in my question. How can something self-compile if it doesn't have a compiler to start with? Does the onramp source contain some machine code that is a compiler already?
We're at the "computers play chess badly" stage. Then we'll hit the Deep Thought (1988) and Deep Blue (1995-1997) stages, but still saying that solving Go won't happen for 50+ years and that humans will continue to be better than computers.

The date/time that divides my world into before/after is AlphaGo v Lee Sedol game 3 (2016). From that time forward, I don't dismiss out of hand speculations of how soon we can have intelligent machines. Ray Kurzweil date of 2045 is as good as any (and better than most) for an estimate. Like Moore's (and related) Laws, it's not about how but the historical pace of advancements crossing a fairly static point of human capability.

Application coding, requires much less intelligence than playing Go at these high levels. The main differences are concise representation and clear final outcome scoring. LLMs deal quite well with the fuzziness of human communications. There may be a few more pegs to place but when seems predictably unknown.
> an exception occurred

An exception was effectively injected from outside of the code via low level shenanigans. That's not "exceptions bad" that's "low level monkeying with program control flow can blow up in your face".
The problem is the seemingly endless parade of photo software that forces you to add everything to a "database," instead of simply a directory structure. It's tedious as hell, and must be manually kept up to date all the time instead of simply picking up any files added to the structure.
I made a media server and nobody cares
Ditto here as well. Got the confirmation email, but clicking it yielded a server not found...
I bought in early to typingmind, a great web based frontend. Good for editing context, and switching from say gemini to claude. This is a very normal flow for me, and whatever tool you use should enable this

also nice to interact with an LLM in vim, as the context is the buffer

obviously simon’s llm tool rules. I’ve wrapped it for vim
They brought the impact on themselves by having the remaster be a rebuild of the crappy mobile port. One of the most well known games ever and they treated it like trash.

Digital Foundry did a video back when it released detailing the problems: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1JJt7xHTlE
It should be noted that DeepSeek routinely claims to be a "language model trained by OpenAI", so it's pretty clear that it wasn't trained at 10x less cost from scratch, but rather on synthetic output generated by ChatGPT.

Not to point a finger at DeepSeek specifically; this is generally the case for best open source models right now. The best LLaMA finetunes tend to also use ChatGPT-generated synthetic datasets a lot.

Either way, it's unclear what the real cost is when you factor that in.
Almonds Can't Do Math
My point is that if you pick a diverse audience, you will come up with a diverse set of expectations.

In Twilight, the main character is not actually described very well. There's an old comic from the oatmeal [1] about how the main character should be named "pants", because they're made just so that every reader can slip into the place and pretend like they're the main character.

This is a lot more common in books than I think you may realize. So when characters don't match expectations, it's because people are saying that characters don't look like them... which is, like, accidentally racism. To be clear, I don't think people are doing this maliciously. It's just that what you expect is not necessarily what you have to get.

[1] https://theoatmeal.com/story/twilight
I know, but the "seniors" in that place didn't
Because of Bitcoin volatility, fees are very insignificant compared to daily price movement and irrelevant in day trading.
Build your ideal city with Arnis.
> China has 900M people making less than $400/month

Most of these folks are illiterate oldies that would pass away in a few years anyway.
There are evented I/O APIs for Unix, though anything other than select(2) and poll(2) is non-standard, and while some do let you use pointer-sized user cookies to identify the events I've never seen a case where a programmer used a stack address as a cookie. I have seen cases where the address used as the cookie was freed before the event registration was deleted, or before it fired, leading to use-after-free bugs.
TokisanGames/Sky3D: Atmospheric Day/Night Cycle for Godot 4
Photos also stuffs everything into a proprietary database... a blunder made by far too many photo applications.