skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks! I use several key prompting techniques:

1. Role + Goal Setting: The AI acts as a creative market analyst focused on discovering overlooked opportunities and emerging trends.

2. Structured Analysis Framework:
- Detailed evaluation criteria (innovation, moat, management, growth potential)
- Sector diversity requirements
- Focus on finding hidden gems vs obvious mega-cap tech stocks

3. Time-Bound Precision:
Instead of vague "3-6 months" holding periods, I require exact hour calculations tied to specific catalysts like:
- FDA approval dates
- Earnings releases
- Product launches
- Conference presentations

4. Quality Controls:
- Must be valid NYSE/NASDAQ symbols
- Diverse across sectors/market caps
- Conviction level scoring (1-10)
- Each pick needs unique thesis + catalyst
- JSON output format for consistency

The key is combining structured analysis with creative discovery - pushing the AI to look beyond obvious choices while maintaining some analytical rigor.
Lose $5. Seems like a reasonable enough experiment.
> To create an Audio Asset, you need to import your audio file (mp3, wav, ogg, mkv) into your project.

Seriously? You can't have audio except precomputed in a file?
I don't think any reverse debugging system can step the kernel backwards to this degree, unless they're doing something really clever (slow) with virtual machines and snapshots.
Ask HN: Should the world just give all vram to Nvidia?
Whether it's right or wrong, if TSMC gave all priority to nvidia, everyone would have cuda capable cards. It's almost like we're wasting time as a society by giving space to AMD and Intel to crowd the market.
I would like to see one of these surveys since all data I’ve seen suggests Israelis support the genocide. I even posted the survey data we do have.
Can I let Claude do all my trading for me? It currently sits at 77% unrealized gains.
No stocks have been sold yet, so no profit/loss has been calculated, if you look below, you can see the unrealized gains for stocks being held.
Even better, considering how often Harmonica gets let go/ignored throughout the movie, despite clearly not being who he says he is.
I am committed - added to my daily morning reading list! Will be interesting - my gut will state that it will outperform a fair number of ITF's, if only due to the inevitable usage by said funds!
> The goal is to study how different LLMs interpret financial data and make decisions with real consequences.

I don't really buy this. If the goal was to study how different LLMs interpret financial data there would be no use for actual trades, since their interpretation cannot be influenced by the fact that the trading orders are passed for real.

I believe the goal is to see if AI can do better than rats [0].
There is no shame in that.

[0]: https://www.vice.com/en/article/rattraders-0000519-v21n12/
Can the AIs short?
This poor human being doesn't deserve to pay the price for the shitty middle management actions though :(
Watch a random number generator generate random numbers.
You have to buy before you sell
Sheryl Sandberg does not have a technical background. A better analogy would be Eric Schmidt or Adam D'Angelo.
> The way I see it, most companies already use modern ATS to stack rank every application based on their resume using AI and then just go down the list.

I have never worked anywhere that has done this. Humans have always reviewed every application.
If they just get the financial headlines and indicators, aren't they all just momentum trading from sentiment analysis?
https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/licensing.html

Now,

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LGPLStaticVsDynami...

> For the purpose of complying with the LGPL (any extant version: v2, v2.1 or v3):

> If you statically link against an LGPLed library, you _must_ also provide your application in _an object_ (not necessarily source) format, so that a user has the opportunity to modify the library and relink the application.

Basically not a single software developer is going to go through these hoops to link with LGPL statically. I don't care about theory crafting. Linux has been there for over 30 years now. Show me the applications that comply with that. I dare you.

Actually I know a single example (!) and that's proprietary NVIDIA drivers. Not an application BTW. You cannot imagine how difficult Linux kernel developers have made life for NVIDIA. Yeah, there's a huge object file to be linked with the kernel. Other examples? None. In Windows you compile a driver and have it work flawlessly for at least a decade.

Sorry, I'm done with you. You're now baselessly and shamelessly accusing me of lying where a simple Google search reveals everything I say is true.

Windows requires none of this crap. What's funny is that Win32 is the only stable Linux API. Not even glibc provides it. What's even more funnier is that DirectX is still a far more richer set of APIs than what Linux provides despite Open Source making it as hard as possible to link to it. And basically no one does.

With most laptops and pre-assembled PCs Windows comes for "free" (included in the cost). If you're a builder, you can get a Windows license for a low as $10 and live happily ever after and use your old applications including I don't know Adobe Photoshop CS2 released ... almost 20 years ago. Still works fine in Windows 11.

Merry Christmas.
> quite a lot of it was made in the US

Assembled in the US might be a better way to put it. Nearly every component is made in China or elsewhere. This already makes less and less financial sense for a wide array of products, from consumer to industrial.

For example, components and assemblies for televisions are made in China (and Korea). They are shipped to Mexico and assembled there into televisions. This is because there's volumetric efficiency in shipping well-packed components for assembly in Mexico. A finished television in a box consumes most of the shipping volume with air. You pay a lot to ship air. If, instead, you can pack components efficiently, you can ship more TV's per container as parts than as finished products.
I find it interesting how the linked Britannica entry [0] is more readable (to me) than Wikipedia’s introductory section [1]. The latter provides a bit more detail, but somehow reads more difficult and jumbled.

[0] https://www.britannica.com/science/Seyfert-galaxy

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seyfert_galaxy
Profiles with random data stand out and get extra attention. What’s the same between your accounts? Random data.
Each morning the trades are conducted with $5 each, which are mostly fractional shares that are bought.
Not sure how you are sourcing your jobs, but fyi you can get a feed of 1M+ jobs here too:

https://xmlfeed.directemployers.org/default

Some of the players (ZipRecruiter, etc) might also give you a feed. They generally just want traffic.

I used to work on the ML system that rated resumes when the applications were submitted. The ATSes are scoring and sorting the applications that come in, so IMO it's better if everyone "applies" and their matching program runs instead of waiting for people to apply anyways.

Good luck!
From a product standpoint, I am curious if sidebar is the right way to integrate AI features in the browser? Did anyone see any better integrated solutions?
Not only that. I'd like to have AI masking, effective clone tools, lens corrections and please... actually working defaults! You import RAWs (compressed RAFs) and it render horrible results!

Its bloated with useless functions, it's slow, UI is ugly... Why not focus on important? Stop developing another demosaic method and make it more user friendly, less nerdy piece of tool.
I see, thank you. Can they short?
It would be neat to see the process, where they get the data from, how they analyze it.

It would be neat to also see another experiment of a MAS doing this and coordinating to gamble together. Perhaps even different system/arch/expert configs.
None of the stocks have been sold yet, this is just day 2, so once some sales happen, then performance will be better measured. If you scroll down, you can see the unrealized performance.
Yes, feel free to try open-source version available on Github.

Just published a new release to support multiple cloud storage options.

Thanks
Is anyone doing anything else?
“talk about an ecosystem of trust”

I’m actually looking back at the past, and realizing why app stores took over.

For the developers, it was indeed an ecosystem of trust.

For regular users, it was hell. The app stores, on a basic level, were absolutely in their best interest.

Why does the phone, even now, have more apps than desktop? I answer that it was because users could try software for the first time, and could afford to take risks, knowing with certainty it wouldn’t steal their bank account. Users were implicitly trained on the “free” platforms to trust no one, take no risks, that .exe (or .deb) could ruin your life.

For the average user, there has never been such an ecosystem of trust as there is now. That’s a sobering indictment about how a “free” or “open” platform can simultaneously be, for most people, user-hostile.

Or another example: We like owning our data, knowing that Docx is ours, as you also complain above.

But if you talk to many families; so many families have horror stories of digital losses. Lost photos, lost tax documents, lost memories. Apple charges $2.99/mo. and they’ll never lose it (or at least, the odds are lower than a self-inflicted disaster)? For them, the cloud has never felt so freeing.
Yes.

This is not necessarily a poor value trading strategy.
> it's not any more an ethnostate than France is an "ethnostate" for the French.

It is moreso one because there are French citizenship standards for people currently wanting to become citizens not based on ethnicity. And people indigenous to France not of the preferred ethnicity are not forced to live outside the country with no right to citizenship. The need for Israel to be majority Jewish requires that Palestinians cannot become citizens of Israel, even though their lives are completely controlled by the polity of Israel, by necessity, according to the Israeli government, for security reasons.

> why did the Palestinians ramp up the violence when on the way to getting what they ostensibly want?

Why did the Israelis do the same? Even after Oslo, why expand settlements when they got so many concessions from the PA and eliminated essentially their greatest foe of decades, the PLO, through diplomacy? Again, the conflict is not solved by painting one side as a bad faith actor and the other as a good faith actor. There are bad faith actors on both sides increasingly in power. It is not Russia/Ukraine where one clearly invaded a sovereign nation. In this case one does not recognize the other nation while simultaneously blockading all the people in that unrecognized nation, who are all stateless. No matter how we got to this point, it isn't justifiable long term and it is not going to last as a solution. As I said before, let's be honest about both sides' shortcomings.

> They just aren't fighting because they aren't competing over anything.

That's what I said also in reference to Zimbabwe, it applies also to Mexico.

> If Mexico tomorrow...started shooting rockets at the US and invading the US

Did you read my other comment? I will repost my response when I predicted you would say this and preemptively answered:

"You would balk at that saying "But the Palestinians are a security threat. Israel cannot be expected to allow that on its border. The US would never allow Mexico... Etc." and that is of course the same logic Palestine uses to justify its attacks on Israel."

> What brings peace is agreeing to live next to each other without killing each other.

Both sides have rejected to do that when the other has opted for peace. Again the West Bank and PA is very illustrative of this, and you know the analogous situations for your side also
Zildjian, a 400-year-old cymbal-making company in Massachusetts
It's a little overbuilt, but a 1000w for a 300w processor with ability to add a lot of accessories isn't terrible actually. only needs a few more PCIe devices to make it meet the 50% minimum to reach peak efficieny on the PSU.
None of that fits the definition of an OS. As per Wikipedia, “An operating system (OS) is system software that manages computer hardware and software resources, and provides common services for computer programs.”:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operating_system

The reason Linux is not an operating system is because it is just the kernel and you need more than a kernel to fit that definition.

The only thing you said that is correct is that amdgpu has issues. Everything else you just wrote is wrong.
What’s the investment horizon for these daily decisions? Does it have a maximum hold time? How long will you run the experiment and is it enough to cover all the catalysts that are expected?
TIME's Top Photos of 2024
Unless I misunderstood your comment completely I think we’re saying the same thing:)
Now this is interesting. An LLM capable of delivering consistent returns even outside of a bull market would be more of an indicator of AGI to me than any of the benchmarks.
That's nice, thanks for correcting me! Although it's quite a nuisance that most PWA info I looked for before posting had the old 50mb (mis)information.
Or FISH.

https://youtu.be/USKD3vPD6ZA?si=AGyGdPdSPpJezQJp

The scene towards the end where he pitches it to a bunch of hucksters is brilliant.
> It's almost like we're wasting time as a society by giving space to AMD and Intel to crowd the market.

No, Nvidia is teaching AMD, Intel and Apple that they have to learn together or be buried in a single grave. Time spent reiterating a valuable lesson isn't wasted at all.
Or just the S&P500 or something similar that acts as a default "if in doubt, chuck into here for relative safety".
I don’t have a generalized answer, but they have been making it, I guess is the answer? It’s been over 6 years since I interviewed, but talking with friends they haven’t missed a payroll. Sometimes smoke indicates a fire, sometimes it indicates bbq I guess.
Really cool, you might want to update the main above the fold summary stats to include the unrealised gains, because it looks like nothing is working / nothing has happened until you scroll and read around a bit.
select() (written in C, a language without exceptions) is synchronous, its authors just (reasonably) did not expect an exception to be thrown in the middle of it invoking a blocking syscall. The algorithm was correct in the absence of a language feature C simply does not have and that is relatively surprising (you don't expect syscalls to throw in C++ either).
Very true, but you can also keep around an old Android phone, or even emulate an old AOSP distribution if your really need to. Obviously this is not ideal, but if you're trusting your hobby or business to an app, it is in your best interest to make sure that it doesn't poof out of existence randomly before you can upgrade.
Also in bill Brysons a complete history of nearly everything he recounts a story of a serial entrepreneur who was trying to come up with an inexpensive way to synthesize penicillin and one of his ideas was putting buckets of urine in his basement.

He found that months later there was a substance that collected on the surface that glowed in the dark.

He purified it and found it had a very low ignition temperature, one so low it was achievable through friction, so he put it on the end of a stick and invented strike anywhere matches.
Wooah I think you are a BIG fan of censorship. Just the kind you like.
And as to "reading the room" its hard to put into words how uninterested I am in conforming to the smug, out of touch culture of Silicon Valley.
If we're a disease, don't you want to exterminate us?

But then, if all other life is so much better than human life, and if by adding 220ppm of CO2 we extended the time left for that life on Earth by a few million years, didn't our intervention save non-human life from a worse fate[0] than merely having to deal with us? So we can be both, disease and cure.

[0] All life on Earth will go extinct eventually, but if we've added a few million years to its story so far, and we could add more millions later, then maybe saying we've "saved" that life is fair.
I think this is a fair characterization. Its mostly meant to be a learning exercise for myself, just thought it would be fun to share.
This is why manufacturers don't do this for volatile register access. You now have bloated, hazard prone code with multiple read-modify-writes.
>especially in a western country

I'm not really convinced this is a distinction that matters.
I was trying to recover data off a laptop in basically the same situation. My solution was to boot into a WinPE live USB and use bcdedit to enable safe mode (as trying to do it the normal way would ask me for the BitLocker key), which let me boot without BSODing. Though this wouldn’t work if the BSOD happens in safe mode as well…
> You’re doing something very, very wrong

hahha, really fun taking into account quote from article:

> You're using the wrong Linux distribution
Is there any weighting towards selling in the negative? Else the LLM's should just hold their unrealised losses, and only sell post local peak - depends on their suggested measurement of success?
Seeing as rust has no stable ABI and likely never will. How would you provide the API in rust, also in golang, also in .NET, and swift, and Java, and whatever other language you add without doing exactly what Win32 does and go to C which has a stable ABI to tie into all those other languages?
That’s a stretch to call it lossy. To my eye the purpose of the LSTM seems indistinguishable from a traditional compression dictionary.

And that still doesn’t show how lossless compression is tied to intelligence. The example I always like to give is, “What’s more intelligent? Reciting the US war of independence Wikipedia page verbatim every time or being able to synthesize a useful summary in your own words and provide relevant contextual information such as it’s role in the French Revolution?”
People who want to learn chemistry from first principles in a fun way should read Jules Verne 's "Mysterious Island" or, in manga or anime , "Dr Stone". Lots of fun.
> Apps make it far easier to advertise to users.

And to obstruct users e.g. from screenshotting content such as my bank transaction data.
You only looked at the abstract. Go look at the study instead of making up claims about lack of controls.
I'm still of the opinion that an Xperia Z1 Compact running LineageOS handily outcompetes any cycling computer that Germin or Wahoo has shipped in the past 10 years.
> while traditional numbers can, uh, be purchased anonymously at the corner store.

That is a closing window and the case in fewer and fewer places. It wont be long until most people would need to fly across the globe or get involved with organised crime to pull that off...
Then you acknowledge your previous claims about the capability not existing were wrong. You also contradict yourself by saying elsewhere that mostly geeks run Linux, which implies far more than 99.99% of users can do this. It is not a hack either. It is the way you are supposed to run old software by design.
No, your position is: "I think it would be a good idea to create an explicit carve out in the law saying that there is no premise liability for a property owner or event organizer due to a third party committing a crime." and "I don't want a world where I have to submit to searches to go anywhere or do anything."

This means that nobody should be searched when they go anywhere or do anything, and if they aren't and someone gets shot by a third party, stabbed by a third party, or mugged by a third party then there is no liability to the business/landowner in any case. Ever. Searches will not be rare in practice, they will not occur. Airports? Never. Concerts? Never. Hotel rooms? Never. Schools? Never.

And hence we've already established the problem with your position and why it's fringe. Not even you can realistically argue for your own positions without caveats. This is a great example of a motte and bailey fallacy.
Another good suggestion I could implement is measuring against something like VOO, if all the money was invested in that instead of these individual trades.
> Can you scan a check from your web browser?

Yes

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/MediaDevice...
Great example of Hyrum's Law, https://www.hyrumslaw.com/.

Comments about SHA256 are irrelevant - you can misuse the prefix of a SHA256 hash just as easily. The issue is that people got used to human-readable hash prefixes of 10-12 characters as "unique" for all intents and purposes, despite the fact that there were never any uniqueness guarantees for prefixes and git has always handled collisions with short object IDs as ambiguous - it's just that it's so rare to happen in the real world that lots of script writers treated that "mostly unique" as a guarantee.

IMO support for short object IDs is a mistake, as is any behavior that "works this way 99.999% of the time, but hey developer don't forget you need to also code for that .001% edge case". I'm always just copying and pasting things around anyway, so it really doesn't make much difference to me if I'm copying 12 chars or 64.
Not yet, but this is a great idea to look into.
> There are hours of podcasts with Chomsky talking about LLMs

I'm not an expert, but it seems like Chomsky's views have pretty much been falsified at this point. He's been saying for a long time that neural networks are a dead end. But there hasn't been anything close to a working implementation of his theory of language, and meanwhile the learning approach has proven itself to be effective beyond any reasonable doubt. I've been interested in Chomsky for a long time but when I hear him say "there's nothing interesting to learn from artificial neural networks" it just sounds like a man that doesn't want to admit he's been wrong all this time. There is _nothing_ for a linguist to learn from an actually working artificial language model? How can that possibly be? There were two approaches - rule-based vs learning - and who came out on top is pretty damn obvious at this point.
Yep, the only photo library tool I’ve used that can handle 40K raws is Lightroom and Photomechanic. Everything else can’t handle ~2TB of photos.
Human nature never changes
Unrelated. Tracking data is service-side, not secret to the phone.
(1) DSLs work great sometimes. See https://www.jooq.org/

(2) Elastic Load Balancer is a control loop responsive to workloads, that kind of thing is a commodity

(3) Under-provisioning is rampant in most industries; see https://erikbern.com/2018/03/27/waiting-time-load-factor-and... and https://www.amazon.com/Goal-Process-Ongoing-Improvement/dp/0...

(4) Anomaly detection is not inherently a problem of distributed systems like the others, but someone facing the problems they've been burned with might think they need it. Intellectually it's tough. The first algorithm I saw that felt halfway smart was https://scikit-learn.org/1.5/modules/outlier_detection.html#... which is sometimes a miracle and I had good luck using it on text with the CNN-based embeddings we had in 2018 but none at all w/ SBERT.
> Or a monkey.

or just a stocktrader haha
I don't understand what this has to do with the topic.
It apparently uses the same iteration strategy as tokenized thinking, so that's not it.

> Since both strategies provided comparable results, the researchers opted for using a constant number of thoughts for simplicity.
GPT’s guess makes the most sense. If you are an AI, invest in a competing AI company. If you are obsoleted, maybe you can buy your way out of being shut off.