skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks!
I did it, but I'm having problems with window resizing and mouse selection.
When I try to resize the window, the actual window is smaller than it appears.
Did you encounter the same issue?
Related issues:

https://github.com/microsoft/wslg/issues/1008
https://github.com/microsoft/wslg/issues/633
> In the lab we can prime sleepers to have lucid dreams by waking them and then prompting them as they fall back asleep.

This felt odd to read.
A simple app was discussed recently:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42165849

Although it's not about a magical device but about practice.
> But often there are many shades of grey e.g. a human may say I don't know and refer to someone else or do some research. Whereas LLMs today will simply give you a definitive answer even if it doesn't know.

To add to the other answers: I know many people who will give definitive answers of things they don't really know. They just rely on the fact you also don't know. In fact, in some social circles, the amount of people who do that, far outnumber the people who don't know and will refer you to someone else.
You remember when Google was scared to release LLMs? You remember that Googler that got fired because he thought the LLM was sentient?

There is likely a couple of surprised still left in LLMs but no one should think that any present technology in its current state or architecture will get us to AGI or anything that remotely resembles it.
Mandatory USB-C Chargers for Mobiles Starting Dec 28 in France
Just because something is probabilistic in its response doesn't mean it's not useable.

There are many probabilistic algorithms and data structures that we use daily.

Yes, we don't have developed abstractions to integrate an LLM in a programming language, but it doesn't mean no one will make one.
By that logic there exist introverts who are more successful than extroverts.

If they become more successful if they act against their self is questionable, like asking straight people to become a little more gay or vice versa.
What are you talking about????

A human with AI is literally a "human-like intelligent agent", man.

What you tried to say is that you (some argue, mistakenly) understand that LLMs are not a suprahuman, supersubjective entity.

What I see is that we are heading exactly there, and also seemingly in the opposite direction, by default. Let me explain.

Take Grok, for example. It is a will curated by Elon Musk and his team that nourishes off the POV of everything they feed it and what we put into X. Have you seen what users fed it regarding Indians and American migration over Christsmas? I know AI is in its infancy, and I understand more now (I hadn't been paying attention) to what Sam Altman said about the decision to deploy it little by little to the laymen. The problem is not that a Terminator robot army goes rogue "on its own" and kill us, the problem is that the race towards AGI finds us casually or inevitably in a multipolar moment of international politics. Unlike a few years ago, when the US had the upper hand IN THE ENTIRE WORLD to shape it as they desired, now that they have long fucked it up we have many opposing factions. Russia is awake, it was never defused. China and India are growing up, Europe is dying, Africa is a Mess, Latin America is America's dumpster as it's alway's been (with a few pockets of mildly concerning foreign influence) and the US is A COMPLETE MESS. There is a lot of corruption, stupidity and internal quarrels in the most powerful country in the world.

So where are we headed? Will there be a semi-autonomous war between the strongest leaders (bee assassins going after Trump, Putin and Xi, after Altman or Musk?), and what about the weaker or least developed peoples like Latin Americans and Africans? Many have great pride and may not comply happily if the Boss is self-centered enough. So who will be boss? Elon? Sam? Microsoft's CFO? Trump? An Arab Leader? A Muslim? An infidel? Will left and right wingers happily comply?

The danger is not a godlike entity but us, humans with subjective interests. And Capital as of now is concentrating over the dividing road, in the multipolar world. Can we pivot towards decentralized efforts to create an AI company that has as an absolute priority to lift most if not all people up, and leave those who want to be out, peacefully out?
except passkeys bought you a false sense of security and easy. yeah the happy path is easier because you're just generating new keys... but if the user ever gets a new phone or sit in front of another device, now passkeys are more complicated than the alternative.

sadly the world became too dumbly complacent to question their devices.
It really isn't, aside from using public key cryptography. There isn't even a concept of a "block" (ie. a linked list where each node is cryptographically linked to a prior node).
Because certain countries immediately evoke knee jerk reaction. Iran bad. US good. Simple black and white view
Many potential use cases. Quantum key distribution, quantum imaging, quantum sensing etc.
> Maybe because the implications are almost unthinkably profound.

laundering stolen IP from actual human artists and researchers, extinguishing jobs, deflecting responsibility for disasters. yeah, I can't wait for these "profound implications" to come to fruition!
That's reasonable. I cut back the text. On the other hand I'm hoping downvoters have read enough to see that the AI-generated comment (and your response) are completely on-topic in this thread.
Nice. I also have an implementation in Rust (no public repository, private note-taking app).
One low-hanging fruit (IMO) to improve on the base SM-2 is to more smartly pick the initial ease. I just took the average ease of "similar" mature items. Since for my use-case, spaced repetition items are embedded in notes, "similar" items meant items in the same note, or in notes that were tagged similarly.

These days I often wonder if I should just switch to FSRS [1], which Anki also switched to. It delivers better results. However, I am hesitating, since I understand SM-2, and it is easy to read the code while FSRS is complex and feels kinda black-boxy, which wouldn't feel right to me.

A quick note to the implementation above: I wonder if having that many answer options is worth it. It probably increases the cognitive effort needed for grading and I wonder if the increased precision in some cases is worth that. But who knows?

[1] https://github.com/open-spaced-repetition
Why? I mean, nobody forces you to use tech tools for lucid dreaming.

This is like saying science and technology should stay out of the area of... whatever, say, running. Nobody forces you to wear high-tech gadgets while running.
Physics Professors Are Using AI Models as Physics Tutors
Consider the following: I make a form of parody that is known as a Youtube Poop. It was all the rage last decade, but now it's a dying art.

In part because of these stupid DMCA rules preventing people like me from expressing their creativity.

I can appeal the strikes, but every time I do so I risk losing my channel forever. I don't monetize, and I only make parodies of stuff that came out over 10 years ago. So I've already accepted that the existence of my channel is ephemeral and that one day it will probably disappear forever.

But I don't have any other platform to go to if I want to share my 5-10 minutes long edits with more than 4 people.

Why am I not allowed to continue an art form that owes its name to the platform that spawned it? Is protecting the copyright of some random anime adaptation or cartoon (that no one gives a shit about anymore) seriously more important than creating novel art?

Copyright lasts WAY too much.

And no, I don't really want to go to court over this bullshit. But I am firmly convinced that it's in my rights to produce it. It's just that what counts as "my rights" depends entirely on the jurisdiction, because the law is a joke meant to protect people who can afford good lawyers -- it's not meant to actually enforce justice. Or rather, the concept of justice is so malleable that it basically means nothing in a globalized world.

Also, I'm from Europe. Which court should I go to when I infringe on an american dub copyright for a japanese cartoon, exactly?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_goo
> Normal people do not try to plot the course of their upcoming flights

I am in India. Everyone is very aware of the Air India flights that overfly Russia, Iran, et cetera and those—mostly foreign airlines— who do not.
> ...I really don’t give a shit and say just give the government everything and it’s weird to see people try to throw up layers...

Yeah, this always struck me as so strange. I worked at a contractor where our customer really did own all of the deliverables, but I had peers who worked at contractors where that wasn't the case. To them, I was all like, "Guys. Our tax money is paying for this. Why are you rooting for pulling money out of everyone's pocket to massively enrich a few fat cats and sales guys in your company?".

Like, if you're of a "We're not going to give everything to the government" persuasion, then the reasonable way to handle that is to give the government the deliverables to do anything they want with, just so long as you're free to sell the unclassified components of it (and things derived from them) in the private sector to interested parties without interference.
Sure, but LLMs don't lie in a predictable way. Its just their nature that they output statistical sentence continuations, with a complete disregard for the truth. Everything that they output is suspect, especially the potentially useful stuff that you don't know whether it's true or false.
They should work if you exit and restart ghostty.
Except AI is actually delivering value and on the path to AGI.. and nuclear fusion continues to be a physicists and engineering pipe dream.
It was never 'legal vs illegal' nor is it about skilled vs unskilled - these were always imperfect proxies for the real debate, which is white vs non-white immigration.

Trump is incredibly crude, but he at least does not have (or perhaps, care for) the sophistry to disguise his preferences: Norwegians please, not people from 'sh1thole' countries. This is broadly the position of the nativist right, whilst Musk and the SV tech CEO's are capitalists at heart, so don't really care other being able to hire who they want when they want, insulated as they are to every other consideration outside of company success.

Masks are off, for both sides
If the iron dome accidentally shoots down in civilian airliner it’s ‘ridiculous’ to blame anyone other than Israel was your statement
FYI: "You will have until Friday, March 7th at 5:00pm ET to download your Bench data from this website."
I think I’d do this via a Google Apps Scripts trigger and have the script run every minute and if the minute is 59 or 00 then send the email.
Indeed. The entire project is amazing.-
How are you bounded? When you can easily check the sources? Also you act as if humans without LLMs have a higher success rate?

There is an entire “reproducibility crisis” with research.
Running DeepSeek V3 671B on M4 Mac Mini Cluster
Show HN: The Surprising Efficiency of Fine-Tuned LLMs on Patent Claim Generation
> Video games are designed to be played interactively. Streaming a single playthrough via a non-interactive medium strikes me as transformative.

This is one of those areas where principles like “fair use” and “transformative use” don’t really matter, since we’re talking about YouTube de facto policy, not the law. If YouTube decides to honor the claims, then that’s what happens. And YouTube generally errs hard in the direction of rightsholders just to be safe.
Check the time on your phone/watch twice in a short time.
If I know anything about humans, this is a good vehicle to get investment for innovation - porn has been a silent driver of internet technology.
In my experience, emotional attachment is often the most expensive thing there is.
Writing about twitter debates between marginal MAGA figures, is this the next four years of "democracy dies in darkness?"
I spent 8 hours trying to fix a bug once because notepad used smart quotation marks (really showing my age here - and now I'm pretty annoyed that the instructor was telling us to use notepad, but it was 2001 and I didn't know any better).
It is a rather big problem, yes. You can absolutely get by without speaking any Dutch, I know people who have spent 10+ years in the country with just very basic knowledge of the language. Absolutely kills the motivation for a lot of people.
Astronauts face unique visual challenges at lunar South Pole
That depends on whether you trust the Houthis or the US Navy's sheepish apology for shooting at two F-18s (one missed), which will almost certainly have career consequences for somebody.
A lot of "big compute" stuff from before the rise of the cloud was on mainframe-y type hardware. And still is, because migration is really really hard.

Where I work, we're still trying to migrate a bunch of services off of VMS+Itanium. My experience thus far is that putting this stuff in the cloud on commodity x86 is not really any cheaper or more performant. But it should end up being way easier to support and extend in the long run, so is probably still worth doing.

The main problem that I run into is actually a people problem. There is no defined roadmap for doing this stuff, so it kind of feels like greenfield development, and you end up with endless bikeshedding and cargo-cult-driven design patterns. The happy path is easy, but it all falls apart on the edge cases. But handling the edge cases is why the customer pays you money...

Anyway, I'm sure that IBM will continue to make and sell Power CPUs for a long time if only because it will take forever to migrate off of them.
BTW if you believe you own words why are you still a developer?
You're obsolete and will be replaced by a 12 year old.
Not even close. Half the time you can’t even get workable mobile internet at customs.
Do you write binary code or use a compiler?

Do you design all the NAND gates in your processor to get the exact program you want out of it or use a general purpose processor?

Current "coding" is just a detail of what you want to do: solve problems. Which can require making a machine do what you want it to.
What is that bump in utility in practical terms? You can point to a benchmark improvement but that's no indication the agent swarm is not reducing to "giving an llm an arbitrary amount of random guesses".
I see what your meaning now, thanks for making it clear. I haven't used Arcan in a while, but from what I remember from my (admittedly little) use and architecture reading, it might be in the best spot to get what you want. Lua bindings are pervasive and should in theory get close to what you want, but more research and work is needed to realise that.

But yes, I really feel bad that after 16(!) years, wayland is still a shitshow in all the cases of not drawing windows on the display, and I say this as someone who has been using Wayland daily for half a decade now, and lived through things being even shittier. I just silently keep wishing Arcan gets there as a universal drop-in replacement.
Fascinating, that has not been my experience. Can you give some examples?

Although I will note there is always some variance, the issue happens when it's too great, and some people's definition of a word is barely even overlapping with another person's definition of a word.
No you couldn't. Totally different domain.
https://github.com/denys-olleik/accounting

Doing my best wish someone would help.
Relevant signals are encrypted, too.

Metadata could be useful to intercept.
as an idea I'd suggest to evaluate your codebase with the multiple llms available now using the free tier (deepseek V3, llama 3.3 versatile on groq, gemini-exp-.. on google ai studio and so on)

on each llm provider you can find prompting best practices or techniques to improve your eval prompt and eval your code correctly

at least the feedback loop would be faster

if you already thought about it or already did that, well ... great
Then you are comfortable making a decision that could cost thousands of lives over one with a few hundred without taking in any other information other than a radar bounce that is approximately the same size/speed.
We’re going to need to see this working. From my perspective many of the corporate llms are actually getting worse. Slop feedback loops.

By no means has it been proven that llms functioning the way you describe will result in superior output.
It’s also already becoming an issue for open-source projects that are being flooded with low-quality (= anything from “correct but pointless” to “actually introduces functional issues that weren’t there before”) LLM-generated PRs and even security reports —- for examples see Daniel Stenberg’s recent writing on this.
Maybe this one

https://decrypt.co/246216/ai-could-make-coders-obsolete-in-t...
> I am sure my content does not infringe copyright and I'm willing to go to court for it

This is exactly what the YouTube copyright counter notification is. The problem is that YouTubers aren't lawyers, so they don't want to risk going to court.

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2807684?hl=en
This is really frustrating. I'll admit their services have been going downhill dramatically (all my books Jan-Nov were still open as of last week and usually they would close subsequent month), but I still think shutting down right before the tax year ends is downright scummy.

What are the alternatives that handle bookkeeping and tax filing? Maybe I should just get a local CPA...
"It's also the reason the US (last I checked*) has standing orders not to attempt to down the drones of unknown origin"

I think it depends. The smaller drones are allowed to be zapped using equiptment designed to take down drowns. They generally aren't shooting traditional munitions at drones domestically for multiple safety reasons, unless they are over a specific size/altitude.
Worth noting this is the old web site of Hans Summers of QRP Labs fame... https://qrp-labs.com
Good ideas (and possible in Wezterm if shell marks the semantic zones, not sure whether possible if not), though not really a normal macos experience given mac's default terminal doesn't select of an entered command on Cmd+A
Agree sadly. I shy away from web3 investment strategies like participating in liquidity pools because I'm scared about reporting the taxes correctly. I'm now considering ways of anonymizing my self-custody so that I can avoid this burden. Im basically forced to act illegally to avoid this toil
You pulled three words completely out of context and misrepresented them. But to be clear, and put another way, (ad) filtering is too important to be left to an extension alone, especially as browsers can no longer be relied upon, and creating layers of filtering like defence in depth is better to avoid single points of failure.
I think that transition already happened, and the next big jump in AI will be the combination of these two approaches in an unified package.

Kind of the way our right brain hemisphere does probabilistic computation and the left brain hemisphere does atomistic computation. And we use both.

So, whoever develops the digital equivalent of the corpus callosum wins.
It doesn’t really matter. “It works and is cost/resource-effective at being an AGI” is a fundamentally uninteresting proposition because we’re done at that point. It’s like debating how we’re going to deal with the demise of our star; we won’t, because we can’t.
This. Stuff like mission statements and that kind of crap is for these type of employees who need to delude themselves that they're not just part of a profit making exercise or manufacturing weapons to suppress minorities / kill brown people. Every company has one.
The carrier "retreating" is also consistent with a lot of other scenarios, including just having fucked up majorly and needing a safe place to spend some quality time yelling at people.
Some video games are a fairly linear progression where observing a single playthrough can give up the bulk of the story.

Reading a book is interactive; you imagine the narrative/interpretive voice as you go through it. You might read a phrase one way where someone else might read it differently. Listening to someone read a book removes that difference but still conveys most of the plot.

Aaand Idk if book reads are on YouTube but typically people pay for audio books and some revenue goes to the author
I'm on macos
Logging in to Bitwarden/1Password/KeePassXC/Strongbox/... takes less than five minutes, even when using sophisticated 2FA.

Would you argue that loading a public key (load it where, actually?) is much faster? How'd you do it practically?
Woah, a few hundred just to demo the thing. How could you keep this afloat?

That’s the tricky part about building LLM apps. I’d love to hear more from Indie devs because money is absolutely a bottle neck here.

For fun:

You don’t need an LLM for some of your calls I think. “Where is the Eiffel Tower”, Eiffel Tower is a NER that small NLP libraries can extract. Then it’s a simple long/lat lookup. You might be able to re-route 20% of your calls to a no-cost backend call.
100nm (more or less) is the positive identification radar advisory zone for a carrier group airspace... (AKA REDCROWN)
Clearly a dig at Mark Rutte...
Facts can be checked with RAG, but the real value of AI isn't as a search replacement, but for reasoning/problem-solving where the answer isn't out there.

How do you, in general, fact check a chain of reasoning?
Then hire a lawyer & sue, you have to enforce your rights.
>Wouldn't the keyboard queue the following keypresses and only apply them once the fix has been made?

I don't think that works. The keyboard can't buffer your input while it waits for a match on its autocorrect dictionary.

Imagine how that would seem if you're typing slowly? You will expect each keypress to have an instant output on screen. But nothing would appear.
US THAAD air defense system intercepted Friday morning Houthi missile
They do lie in a predictable way: if you ask them for a widely available fact you have a very high probability of getting the correct answer, if you ask them for something novel you have a very high probabilty of getting something made up.

If I'm trying to use some tool that just got released or just got a big update, I wont use AI, if I want to check the syntax of a for loop in a language I don't know I will. Whenever you ask it a question you should have an idea in your mind of how likely you are to get a good answer back.
Oh, GhostTTY is a great project. I also agree that some flavor of Gnome is the default out of the box on most distros. I'm bemoaning that fact, not the existence of an excellent terminal library and 3 frontends for it that I will never use.
The important thing is that you can use inference-time computation to improve results. Now the race is on to optimize that.
> The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim. ~ Edsger W. Dijkstra

LLMs / Generative Models can have a profound societal and economic impact without being intelligent. The obsession with intelligence only make their use haphazard and dangerous.

It is a good thing court of laws have established precedent that organizations deploying LLM chatbots are responsible for their output (Eg, Air Canada LLM chatbot promising a non-existent discount being responsibility of Air Canada)

Also most automation has been happening without LLMs/Generative Models. Things like better vision systems have had an enormous impact with industrial automation and QA.
In the context of work outings and socializing, this is doubly so if you are older or unattractive. If you are at a company with a lot of young 20 somethings, they largely really have no interest in being around you, and attempts to socialize with opposite sex can easily be misconstrued (by them) as unwanted.

So it's frankly not worth it, and not sure why I'd even want to put myself in those situations.

And before you reply "well maybe you are being creepy", well QED