skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
UNIX systems at the time probably didn’t care about accuracy to the second being maintained over rare leap second adjustments.

Random example, the wonderful RealTime1987A project (https://bmonreal.github.io/RealTime1987A/) talks about detecting neutrinos from the supernova, and what information can be inferred from the timing of the detections. A major source of that data is the Super Kamiokande project. The data was recorded to tape by a PDP-11, timestamped by its local clock. That clock was periodically synced with UTC with a sophisticated high-tech procedure that consisted of an operator making a phone call to some time service, then typing the time into the computer. As such, the timestamps recorded by this instrument have error bars of something like +/- one minute.

If that’s the sort of world you’re in, trying to account for leap seconds probably seems like a complete waste of effort and precious computer memory.
Practices are usually very granular and are tracked in detail, so increments for this/that abound. I suspect they would gather this low hanging fruit.
Thanks for the small concrete example. I try to explain this a lot. It also makes coverage really easy to get with fewer tests.
The Complete Text of "All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace"
If you are looking for a self hosted server that integrates with SONOS check out Subsonic.

https://www.subsonic.org/pages/index.jsp
Make any page print-friendly, save as PDF, and enjoy a Reader Mode
Yes, ignorant clients 'beg' the magic bullet.
But Discovery got both cancelled and deleted.
Meteorite – Google Search
It is insane in today's world! But big mileage (barefoot, no less) is something we evolved for. Check out the great book Born to Run by Chris Macdougal which explores that concept.
True.
More benchmark metrics here:
https://x.com/deepseek_ai/status/1872242657348710721/photo/2
Huh? The west is already engaged in several wars.
You claim OpSec, but if you’re using such bad opsec, then I’d suggest you’re not actually doing opsec. Tying a throw away account to actual data that can directly identify you is just such bad opsec, you might as well use your actual name as your user name.
Makes me wonder why there is such a death grip on the fee for service model?
This is great! I just tried some queries and the results were pretty decent, in terms of semantics. But, just thinking of it as a user, if this were to be part of my daily workflow (instead of say something like Google Scholar), I would like:

1. The option to somehow see _how_ the paper was reviewed and/or cited, if at all. There are things like OpenReview, see example [1]

2. The ability to "tell me a story to get up to speed" about a collection of papers. Generative models could help here -- but essentially, I want this thing to be able to write a paragraph for what one might find in the literature review / related work of a paper, with citations. :-)

All the best!

[1] https://openreview.net/forum?id=jhKbnNhwhc
RIP Thrawn
Yeah, and? That was the link that was not clicked. If the person had clicked that link they would have seen why their comment was not helpful.
Hi Diti, are you talking about the inapp link to Safari? If so - it's the only reliable escape link for ios. It should work on other WebKit browsers as well but no reliable inapp escape link is available for the default browser on ios anymore. There use to be another ios workaround but they closed it. Basically downloads don't work on inapp browsers and I need some way to get you out of them.
Local governments are particularly incentivized to keep prices high because it means more revenue without an increase in services demand.
(Hmm... A qr code to an audio stream? Could be a fun challenge to get it to sync reliably.)
Your logic is spot on. People trying to argue Discovery is in another universe are not being rational, but emotional.
Yes and no...

Ultimately it would be impossible to come up with these greatly simplified explanations without the complexities and notation taught in the pedagogy you are dismissing.

Granted though, as students, the gifted ones often already have this picture in their mind, so the intuition is obvious. So to bring those less gifted or familiar with a topic up to speed, things like this make a ton of sense.
I've pondered on this question some. Is there such a thing as an objective talent rating? For example, if you take a group like Dream Theater, and look at the skill of each member of that group vs the skill of each member in the typical heavy-metal band, there is a distinct and obvious difference in skill level. Whether or not you like their style or their music's message, Dream Theater's skill is astounding. And you don't have to like all of their songs to appreciate some of them. But the difference might not be noticeable to someone who hasn't attempted to master a musical instrument. Such a person might just go with the flavor of the day; they won't be able to incorporate the amount of work that went into that flavor into their appreciation of it. (Dream Theater's singer has lost his vocal prowess over the years, which is sad but not unusual.)

In a recent concert (at Carnegie) Lang Lang brought out a melody in Chopin's first Scherzo that was very innovative though subtle. If you have any appreciation at all for Chopin, you would want to hear that rendering. It made a show piece into something both beautiful and astounding. But can a machine be made to tell the difference? The song is so fast and notes so blurred that it's almost noise from a reverse-engineering/transcribing standpoint.

Similarly, Sarah Brightman (in her early years) and Loreena McKennitt have far superior vocal skills to the typical modern pop singer. But if you're never exposed to real vocal skills, or if you've never attempted to sing an pure open vowel on pitch and hold it there for a sustained amount of time, why would you care? You wouldn't even know what to appreciate. So is it the algorithm's job to expose people to artists of higher skill and talent? I would like it to. That's absolutely a feature I want. I want to be exposed to those people. I'd like it to go even beyond that. I want to be exposed to talented composers regardless of performer.
Opsec can be a relative term. Yes, some people are selling drugs or spying for the Russian government but other people just don't want to be OSINTed by scripts like this. Then creating a new Gmail account from the same IP address is enough. It's a lot easier to hide your identity from people who don't have the power to issue subpoenas.
Finland boards oil tanker suspected of causing internet, power cable outages
Technically, software for browsing the internet without Adblock is not general purpose. I would consider it to be shopping software.

My point is, this is a No True Scotsman fallacy.
Not so much a planned standard, but Airsonic is about the closest thing. Many servers, clients, and third party tools are airsonic compatible. Navidrome, the current server I'm using is compatible for instance.
Uv: An Fast Python Package Manager
Sometimes I cache: implementing lock-free probabilistic caching
You Don't Get an a for Effort
Show HN: 21st.dev - NPM for Design Engineers Based on Shadcn CLI
I originally built this app to organize and reuse interesting React + Tailwind components I came across on Twitter, inspired by the shadcn/ui approach. Later, a friend started contributing their own components, and it got me thinking—this could grow into something bigger, like an NPM for design engineers to share and use components.

Would love to hear your thoughts!
Monocypher – Boring crypto that simply works
https://archive.is/YNUuz
It’s completely unclear if that means 0% after the normal CC fees or 0% total. Also it’s only up to $1K, after that you are paying 3.9% (again, unclear if it’s 3.9% total or after CC processing). A lot of companies in this space obscure the true cost of processing until you are already signed up and using it.

It’s almost as bad as the infrastructure monitoring companies that never even ballpark the AWS cost (on top of their SaaS cost) you will end up paying to use their service (aka CloudWatch fees).
You wouldn't even need to relax requirement 2 too much, rebasing your commented fork on the trunk would actually help you keep your comments up to date.
Maybe I'm missing something, but this looks like a wrapper around some personality tests? With a polished landing page, but utterly unpolished everywhere else. I'm not feeling like this is a site I want to register on at this point, and any content that would show me more about the actual product is gated behind login pages.

If I were you, I'd get rid of the video on the landing page. It has zero content of the actual product and just gave me AI-generated videos vibes. Replace it with actual screenshots and demo videos of what you have built. Also, match the polish levels across everything. Either polish the whole app, or simplify the landing page. There is nothing wrong with a simple site showing off something new, but when the branding of the landing page is 10x better than everything else, that is when it feels like things are not legit because it screams of AI generation, not actual product work.
One could imagine a scenario where you’re looking at the duration of some brief event by looking at the start and end times. If that’s interval happens to span a leap second then the duration could be significantly different depending on how your timestamps handled it.

Much more important, though, is how it affects the future. The fact that timestamps in the past might be a few seconds different from the straightforward “now minus N seconds” calculation is mostly a curiosity. The fact that clocks might all have to shift by one more second at time point in the future is more significant. There are plenty of real-world scenarios where that needs some substantial effort to account for.
Or alternatively, download more brain.

Yeah, this is big brain time.
Posit: Many who are excited about AI are BA graduates
Who are trying to be relevant in the job market. Use any argument against AI and over 70% of the counter-arguments will involve the word "creative" in a pejorative context or as part of a personal attack, e.g. "You're obviously not very creative person.".
Wiim products are great, they revolutionized low cost home sound setup.
I remember the first box I ever built that went online before I had any clue about what I was doing. It had to have looked like a honeypot. Then someone knowledgeable helped me and started shutting things down. They also mentioned Debian being designed as essentially opt-in instead of opt-out to precisely avoid this issue
The feature dates way back to perhaps 2006, per Jetbrains' PDF archive[1]. Jb also updated their structural search UI/UX in 2018[2]. It is possible that users do not buy in the idea of SSR. Alternatively, it may be caused by the fact that Jb SSR's mixed language support. [3][4][5]

[1] https://www.jetbrains.com/idea/docs/ssr.pdf
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeGPO-UHTbs
[3] https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/structural-search-and-re...
[4] https://www.jetbrains.com/help/go/structural-search-and-repl...
[5] https://www.jetbrains.com/help/pycharm/structural-search-and...
Check out www.dolthub.com
Truly remarkable! Their approach to distributed inference is on an entirely new level. For the prefill stage, they utilized a deployment unit comprising 32 H800 GPUs, while the decoding stage scaled up to 320!! H800 GPUs per unit. Incorporates a multitude of sophisticated parallelization and communication overlap techniques, setting a standard that’s rarely seen in other setups.

[0] https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3/blob/main/DeepSee...
I'll take a look. Perhaps my inapp detection is throwing false positives. I also detect for SFSafariViewController because of the bad UX downloading experience there. Maybe it is catching your browser as well.
I’m not sure I’d use the Unix io interface as a shining example of reducing cognitive load. Sure, it’s a simple interface on the surface but…

Let’s just take write() as an example. Just calling write() does not guarantee that the full contents were written to the file. You could have the case where write() wrote nothing, or some data, but was interrupted because of a signal before it completed. Or you could have a short write because of a quota or disk limit.

And I’m sure I’ll be nerd sniped shortly with even more obscure examples of the sharp edges awaiting you in such a “simple” interface. (For a more snarky version of my comment, see the last essay “the rise of worse is better” of the Unix haters handbook: https://web.mit.edu/~simsong/www/ugh.pdf)

Point is, this interface just shifts cognitive load on to the application developer - it’s got to go somewhere after all.
This is my favourite quote now:

> From the development point if there is something that truly requires multiple developers to implement it is most certainly too complex and should be made simpler or a separate project.

[0] - https://old.reddit.com/r/ProgrammingLanguages/comments/zwp51...
I think most of us associate the word encapsulation with OOP nightmare code that spread mutable state across many small classes that often inherited from one another and hid the wrong state. Stateless and low state are the reaction to that. If you expand the term to include those aids to local reasoning then many more might agree with you.
Popularization (the closest English equivalent word) does have to leave things out, of course. But when what it leaves out is all of the evidence, the thing that distinguishes history from mythology, it does not popularize history but debases it. (The same could be said of science popularization, which all too often amounts to science without the science.)

This is not a necessary feature of popularization, but it is a necessary feature of the sensationalist, pathologically amnesic media we are discussing: podcasts and so-called "social media" like Twitter and Facebook.
Mm. I can't find it now. I'm pretty sure it was Stockholm. Had a WW2 Mark 14 out front - one of those terrible American torpedoes. I do specifically mean a and only a torpedo museum (which is not huge, and was on a little island), not the Maritime Museum (which is huge).
I'll take a look, thanks for the heads-up!
In my understanding, in KataGo, the decision of how long to follow a line is made solely by MCTS via its exploration/exploitation components. These in turn are influence by the policy/value outputs of the DCNN. So in practical terms, your statement might just be called true.

The raw net output includes some values that could be used in addition, but they are not used. I don't know if they were ever looked at closely for this purpose.
Jira entries get wiped arbitrarily. Git blame may not lie, but it doesn't survive larger organizational "refactoring" around team or company mergers. Or refactoring code out into separate project/library. Hell, often enough it doesn't survive commits that rename bunch of files and move other stuff around.
I would, if legal, carry a revolver hiking anywhere with dangerous wildlife :)
Trump will sell Haiti to Denmark in exchange for buying Greenland ;-)
I agree. The constant push for constantly solving 100 problems with 50 poorly understood technologies instead of doing a couple of things and understanding them really well sometimes really makes me hate modern software development.
OpenSubsonic (https://opensubsonic.netlify.app) is the closest. It's a collaborative effort to extend and modernize the Subsonic API, which had become a sort of de-facto standard API. Navidrome, Gonic, LMS (Lightweight Music Server, not Lyrion/Logitech), and other servers implement the API, and Supersonic, Symfonium, and other clients consume it. (And it's backward compatible with the original Subsonic, so older Subsonic clients will work, just not support all the new features that have been added.
I got into Dancing after a breakup as well.

I would advise to learn couple dancing as:
* Zouk (and if you are already doing street style dance, you will love black zouk)
* Bachata (there are so many Bachata dancers around the world, that any country or trip you do, you can go into Bachata socials and make local friends all over the world)
* Tango (it is the hardest dance to learn, but it has the best connection of all)

And definetly go into dance congresses. There are multiple dance congresses on Europe, but if you can go to some of the best dance congresses like zoukmx or into brazilian zouk congresses during January in Rio de Janeiro, it will be a life experience.

Check on youtube "zoukmx social" and "black zouk"
Hi Guys,

I added Immersive Experience with 3D for Vision Pro. If you want to see a urine tank with a fullness rate with 3D. Please check this Pr. https://github.com/Jaennaet/pISSStream/pull/7

#visionpro
“Monotonic” means non-decreasing (or non-increasing if you’re going the other way). Values are allowed to repeat. The term you’re looking for is “strictly increasing.”
BetterDisplay: Extra Configuration Options for macOS
It was not "deleted" in any sense I'm aware of.

Discovery is still canon. The premise of this thread is a conspiracy theory which is not factual. Star Trek Discovery is still a part of the Star Trek franchise. You can still purchase official Discovery memorabilia. You can still stream it. It has an official Blu-ray release.
The closest I know of is subsonic. Since it’s come and gone compatible apps have also worked with backends like airsonic and Navidrome.

I stick with that family because I don’t want to have to change apps (I use play:sub on iOS)
Hardware wise I bought a TerraMaster F4-423 used last year for about 300€. It's a great device.

Software wise, I use Fedora Server, although if I had to reinstall now I would use AlmaLinux because I don't need the new stuff coming with Fedora Server on my NAS.
But wouldn’t it be nice if they were stored in git notes? It’ll never happen for a commercial git hosting product, because they want it to be hard to leave their service (you lose your PR review comment history), and storing them in git makes it too easy to migrate all your history to a competitor.

Building an open source code review system using git notes would be great though.
I make a mind map in FreeMind with method/property names and even pieces of code as nodes.
Better than 1Blocker?
HTTP pipelining isn't used by clients.
Where I am, it is official government agencies that seem to not verify email (and send me sensitive documents meant for others with the same name — a chore to call and ask them to correct their stuff regularly, sigh)

Any comercial sites - dating, gambling etc. end with verification attempts
Technological advances tend to happen in jumps. We are no doubt approaching a local optima right now, but it won't be long until another major advancement propels things forward again. We've seen the same pattern in ML for decades.
Normally in this rant I specifically note that non-software technical people are still technical. For genuinely non-technical software, what are the most popular end-user facing FOSS-developed applications? Firefox, signal, blender, Inkscape, Krita maybe… most of those are backed by foundations that pay designers and in Mozilla’s case, actually do a ton of open usability research. I don’t believe Inkscape does but they do put a ton of effort into thinking about things from the user workflow perspective and definitely do not present all of the functionality to the user all at once. Blender, at first, just made memorize a shitload of shortcuts but they’ve done a ton of work figuring out what users need to see in which tasks in different workflows and have a ton of different purpose-built views. For decades, Gimp treated design, workflow and UI changes like any other feature and they ended up with a cobbled-together ham fisted interface used almost exclusively by developers. You’ll have a hard time finding a professional photographer that hasn’t tried gimp and an even harder time finding one that still uses it because of the confusing, unfocused interface. When mastodon stood a real chance of being what Bluesky is becoming, I was jumping up and down flailing my arms trying to get people to work on polishing the user flow and figure out how to communicate what they needed to know concisely. Dismissal dismissal dismissal. “I taught my grandmother how federation works! They just need to read the documentation! Once they start using it they’ll figure it out!” Well, they started using it, didn’t have that gifted grandmother-teaching developer to explain it to them, and they almost all left immediately afterwards.

Just like human factors engineering, UI design is a unique discipline that many in the engineering field think they can intuit their way through. They’re wrong and if you look beyond technical people, it’s completely obvious.
The North Sea is quite a bit deeper and wider than the English Channel.
I once worked at a FAANG company where I had access to some of the leading C++ experts in the world (some were part of the international language committee). I emailed an internal C++ list asking whether a certain line of code would create a memory leak. It was a pure use of STL templates and casting. The experts could NOT agree whether I was doing it correctly. Some expected a leak, others didn't.

This true little story says everything about C++. JavaScript is full of these things too.
Developers Are Key to Stopping Rising API Security Threat
Why are you not using Obsidian itself? Anything wrong with it?
My kids are just getting into Minecraft on the switch and I am a bit confused by the options for hosting a server. I’d love to hop on and play with them on a self-hosted server, what’s the current best way to do that or is that level of cross-play between PC and Switch on a self-hosted solution even possible?

Edit: I don’t currently play, which is why I’m not familiar with what’s out there
The audiophile market often seems to work like this. Insanely overpriced for marginal or nonexistent gains in quality.
Like psychoslave suggested, try out mise (https://github.com/jdx/mise). I used asdf for years, did the switch to mise and have never looked back for package management. It supports a huge number of languages and is performant.
Both examples stem from not understanding the problem well enough I think. My best work is done when I first write a throwaway spaghetti solution to the problem. Only through this endeavour do I understand the problem well enough to effectively decompose the solution.
Tana has had this for a long time with super tags, and Logseq has it (at least in the test builds of their DB version; I can’t speak to the traditional MD-based version) in their sub-tagging functionality.

I agree that it would be great across the board, though!
While I asked: Possible to add export as an SVG?

noting: That would make it useful for using a design on a CNC or lasercutter.

That feature, as noted below is present --- click on the [>] button to go to a second page where these features are present.
"Correct and accurate information about things that happened does not rise to the level of being real history when it does not include evidence"

I'm missing something. How can 'Correct and Accurate' not be enough? I'm assuming there was 'evidence' in order to affirm the 'correctness' and 'accuracy'.

History book with 'Evidence', I'm assuming Evidence is the thousands of citations, footnotes, appendix, etc... etc... Does that constitute 'Evidence'? I think even this could be picked apart if we wanted.

And then, why can't other forms of media supply citations, and appendix, and evidence?

The History Book can say "then the soldier fired at the enemy", and provide a citation.

But a fictionalized account showing an actor on set doing "then the soldier fired at the enemy", that is false?

You're bar for history is a lot higher than just 'ancient aliens'.

Or you're just saying, it is a slippery slope, watch HBO's 'The Pacific', and pretty soon you'll be believing in Ancient Aliens?