skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Fancy, I think, but again no word on the actual work of turning a few bazillion csv files and pdf's into a knowledge graph.

I see a lot of these KG tools pop up, but they never solve the first problem I have, which is actually constructing the KG itself.
Carter set back nuclear power in the US a lot. Emissions would be in much better shape if he hadn't done that.
Because they're big enough so they can afford not to, and they want to do things that the sandbox/review process/monetisation rules wouldn't let them. I assume the sandbox is exactly why parent wants the app to be there
Same as red meat and alcohol. People really like it. Who are you to tell them to stop?
I have that in the chat app that I am working on.

https://beta.gitsense.com/?chat=51219672-9a37-442d-80a3-14d8...

It provides a summary of all the responses and if you click on "Conversation" in the user message bubble, you can view all the LLM responses to the question of "How many r's in strawberry".

You can fork the message as well and say create a single response based on all responses.

Edit: The chatting capability has been disabled as I don't want to incur an unwanted bill.
> They put a lot of effort into not being just a trading hub.

But yet that's still where the lion's share of revenue for their Government comes from.
CMake wrapper for Xrepo C/C++ package manager
Landing in the ocean is not the same as landing on the hudson river. Not only would the plane have still likely broken up and caught on fire, but rescue crews would have been even further away.

Something went horribly wrong on that plane and in that cockpit. Emergency services didn't even have a chance to prep the runway.
Jimmy Carter:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Carter
Not all that high, considering they're almost half of humanity.

If they were fractured into 200 different countries, no one would say boo about them.
Honestly, I think it's downright dishonest to talk about someone's predictions for what the future would look like and never actually show what their predictions were. This case is particularly annoying, because it's a newspaper summarizing a blog post that's summarizing the original predictions, so there's no actual direct quotations in the article linked here. Although even the originating blog post carries minimal quotations, with such that it does have so thoroughly trimmed that it's hard to actually ascertain what the predictions were in the first place.

Although in one case--the claim of predicting the escalator--the original quotation is not so thoroughly clipped to prevent the assignment of the escalator to the prediction is laughably false:

> [...] lift to the door of his office! If he has to go anywhere on foot moving sidewalks will save him exertion. In his office there will be good automatic telephones, which will get the right number every time! If in [...]

Even the brevity of the clip seems clear that the idea is that moving sidewalks would be the norm in cities as a form of public transport, as opposed to the situation today where moving sidewalks are largely limited to airports and complex train stations, where gates may be some distance. The closest equivalent I can think of is Hong Kong's use of the escalator in a few streets as public transport. Given that moving sidewalks were debuted at least 30 years before the prediction, it should be obvious that the prediction wasn't their existence but their ubiquity.

In general, a lot of these "old futurists correctly predicted the modern world!" types of articles tend to rely very heavily on misinterpreting the predictions to be able to grade them correct, which is why I'm frustrated when the articles don't even bother to source the predictions in their entirety.
Being a monorepo is typically about more than just how code is stored, it leads to very different practices about dependency management, building, etc. On the monorepo I work on, the fact it is a monorepo is intrinsically linked to the build, testing, and deployment processes in many ways.

The ideal is that your build system by-necessity contains the data to be able to selectively test – typically the case if you're linking code in some way. You import a library, now your tests get run if that library changes. As the article suggests, this breaks down over service boundaries, but as you suggest, you still hopefully have modules you can link up.

The problem is when you have hundreds of services, maintaining those dependencies manually could be hard. When you have thousands it may be nearly impossible. When you have hundreds of thousands it may be impossible. I think applying ML to that problem so that you can incrementally understand the ever changing dependencies across services.

I can also assure you that however smart the build system is, there will always be spooky action at a distance between components.
Feel free to investigate all you want, if you personally find there to be convincing, non-circumstantial evidence that the dude was explicitly killed by openAI.

People were lured into locations, where they were vulnerable, where they didn't want to participate; where it was by external forces (they had a lack of agency), and then they died, all to the one-way benefit of some party.

This is a contrived description that could apply to any number of events, from a policeman dying to someone dying of cancer. Fanciful narratives aren't evidence, though. Evidence is something like: Sally saw someone shoot the dude.
"It feels like the left moved left"

In what way? If anything, Democrats have moved to the right on topics like border control and immigration, and haven't really moved strongly to either side on social issues like abortion or drugs, on education, gun control, campaign finance, trade, healthcare, or foreign policy.
86Box: Emulator of x86-Based Machines
> perpetually at risk and easily controlled

I would like to see two changes. One, better oversight of the job categories and their prevailing wage (no more creating new categories with low wages). Two, more freedom for the immigrant to switch jobs at will so long as their job family doesn’t change.

These changes are pro-worker (both resident and immigrant) because they remove the main benefits of hiring foreign labor and prevent undercutting wages. They are changes that I believe SWEs as a class should be in favor of.
For those few who might don’t get the reference, is about the (legendary) site zombo.com
Similar here in Sydney. There was a small boom in outdoor showings, generally parks and greens, around 2020-22. Some sponsored showings, amex and westpac in particular, were quite frequent and well produced. Offhand were back down to 1 or 2 locations and a much shorter “season” of a few weeks in the summer.
Creativity isn’t limited to mathematics. My examples just didn’t use mathematicians.
Slack has /shrug which isn't that far off.

Idk though, I stand by it. Any company that wanted a chat app could get slack or skype or teams instead, and they are backed by a big business who assures they're safe, come with desktop apps that have pop up notifications, and were quicker to boot up, and frankly are better.

And, personality or not, any app that was ported to Sandstorm you can still run off Sandstorm too.

The killer features are one single account for everything (ala Microsoft's suite which also has that), the potential for some very cool interoperability that never quite reached its full potential, and better security, which not enough people/companies were willing to sacrifice other desirable traits for, apparently.
> There's a lot I can respond to in this post, but I think the bottom line is: if you have not experienced the problem, count your blessings.

You don't even specify what problem is it. Again, this is a solution searching for a problem, and one you can't even describe.

> Lots of places do face these problems, with test suites that take hours or days to run if not parallelized.

What do you mean "if not parallelized"? Are you running tests sequentially and then complaining about how long they take to run?

I won't even touch on the red flag which is the apparent lack of modularization.

> And while parallelization reduces latency, it does not reduce costs, and test suites taking 10, 20, or 50USD every time you update a pull request are not uncommon either

Please explain exactly how you managed to put together a test suite that costs up to 50€ to run.

I assure you the list of problems and red flags you state along the way will never even feature selective testing as a factor or as a solution.
It always depends to what scale you chose to measure the harm. Environmental plastic pollution? Sure plastic is way worse. Less broken glass on the sidewalk? Now that plastic is saving your kid and your dog a hospital trip. We are also assuming making the glass bottle is more environmentally friendly than making the plastic one.
>or at least use an LLM that cites its references correctly.

Are there implementation where LLM just out put the text of the references (or the first 100 words). I'm sure someone has implemented already?
Yeah. It was all over popular media, but that seems to be ignored by people who weren't around then. They'll claim that what you actually saw is just anecdotal and should be ignored.
It’s weird that all of the biggest fans of free speech seem to love NDAs so much.
But this is the same for blue sky, it's just that there's no other bluesky "instance"
Well you kept pretending you know how I feel when you don’t, you seemed awfully concerned about how I feel, despite your resistance here being all about you.

Fear is not belittling, it's okay to be afraid. Only shame is to hide from it, or let it rule you. So why all this angry noise and abuse, all this time, when you could have just tried? You can always show it doesn't rule you: try.

Your outburst doesn't affect me because I'm so assured in this - I earned it - but think about how your angry outburst here will affect and may dissuade people who want to try this, and take responsibility for your words and your own convincing, instead of fake blaming others. If dissuading people is your goal, continue and you'll meet people like me who'll push back in ways you dislike. If it's not don't do it.

If you come back to this topic, I encourage you to read my OG answer https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42528680, see your patterns, decide to move beyond them, try the next steps, and head to the remoteviewing subreddit. There's a community of people there happy to assist someone with the humility to say "I don't know, but I'll try". From your behavior here tho, I'm not interested to know you at all, so please do not contact me again. Accept that 'no', thanks. Good bye.

It's a beautiful time of year, I hope you find some peace and that what challenged you here becomes seeds in the new year that grow into real growth rather than the stagnation you orbited. And be better.
> There is no technical moat, but that doesn't mean there isn't a moat.

Gruber writes:

"
My take on OpenAI is that both of the following are true:

OpenAI currently offers, by far, the best product experience of any AI chatbot assistant.
There is no technical moat in this field, and so OpenAI is the epicenter of an investment bubble.
"

It's amusing to me that he seems to think that OpenAI (or xAI or DeepSeek or DeepMind) is in the business of building "chatbots".

The prize is the ability to manufacture intelligence.

How much risk investors are willing to undertake for this prize is evident from their investments, after all, these investors all lived through prior business cycles and bubbles and have the institutional knowledge to know what they're getting into, financially.

How much would you invest for a given probability that the company you invest in will be able to manufacture intelligence at scale in 10 years?
A random HN user will have zero effect on shaping the evolutionary direction of language.
Finally an app that, once and for all, corroborates my notion that the word “bazinga” appears in the King James Bible no less than eight separate times
One of the best year for the defiant and the least successful list since the last days of the H.W. Bush administration.
Just FYI, I'm in the top 250 users on stack overflow and I think I've been contacted like 3 times in over 10 years. I'm not exactly getting a lot of opportunities from it, not that I've advertised as looking either.
> the $100 billion personal wealth threshold

This kinda stuff needs to be scaled by something like GDP per capita, or at least adjusted for inflation, to have any real historical meaning.

For example, when "Millionaire" was coined it meant a very different slice of the population than today, with an inflation difference of ~8x.
"And lo, the prophet Ezekiel stood before the people and declared 'Bazinga!' and the multitudes were bewildered, for they understood not the strange utterance that had passed from his lips." - Book of Chronicles III, Chapter 7, Verse 32
I always suggest this as the first step:

Become "unreachable" — from whom is your choice, but I always suggest to start with ignoring work-related calls/texts, except when *on the clock. Certain countries are beginning to implement "right to disconnect" laws, which require your employer to pay you for contacting you outside of your scheduled work hours.

At this point I wouldn't even give a new employer my personal phone number (they'd get a burner for HR docs)... if your employers wants to call/text you, even during work hours, they can provide a phone/number.
They don't understand their identity, because they don't understand the world. They only understand language, and some of the underlying connections that allow the language to be strung together. In other words, they may have something that seems like a world model, but it's a 2nd order construct that grows out of language, and is therefore quite weak.
Thanks for the reminder! However, I’m a little pessimistic about whether Apple will keep Lockdown Mode maintained and updated - I only remember this popping up after Pegasus and Apple sending out waves of notifications to exploited users, and both seemed to be just a one time effort.
North Korea and Russia's dangerous partnership
> Does other people vaping near you in an enclosed space have a meaningful physiological effect or otherwise?

Yeah it makes his "blood boil"
Classical debugging is looking at a dump of memory in search for the bit that is flipped wrong. :)
one of the ways bitcoin got so big was people getting their money out of China.
There’s an excellent essay about how Powerpoint encourages this style and how bad it is for everyone by Edward Tufte called “The Cognative Style of Powerpoint” https://www.inf.ed.ac.uk/teaching/courses/pi/2016_2017/phil/...
Isn’t this cheating? What will the AI overlords think about this behavior once they take over things ?
John 3:16 - “Bazinga”
yup exactly ! not even that, if somehow power-dissipation can also be done, then eventually all of it paves the way to have actual "place-and-route" thingies running :o) !

not for the faint-of-heart though.
to wit: when Anthem tried to adopt Medicare's rules for anesthesiology
comp, they were excoriated

For everyone in the back: that's not what happened. BCBS tried to place arbitrary limits on anesthesia payment. Medicare does not do this. Physician complaints with Medicare payments revolve around the hourly rate. Physician complaints with BCBS revolve around arbitrarily setting a hard limit for the amount of time a procedure is allowed to take. One is limiting cost, the other is limiting care.
>> OpenAI currently offers, by far, the best product experience of any AI chatbot assistant.

Claude is noticeably better
@simonw made a custom GPT called the dejargonizer just for that purpose: https://chatgpt.com/g/g-3V1JcLD92-dejargonizer
Ecsypno's Codename SCNR web application security scanner, with the Introspector component utilized, along with data processing from OpenAI.

Due to the immense vulnerability context provided by the Introspector, the OpenAI integration can return actionable patching instructions, as well as quite educative insights.

https://ecsypno.com/
Here's the original patent for 'revolving stairs' from 1859: https://patents.google.com/patent/US25076A/en
ARM64 has better perfmance than Intel even after enabled Linux Kernel Vaccine
Dropbox and Slack are examples of another possible outcome: capture the early adopters and stay a player in the space, but still have your lunch eaten by big tech suites that ship similar products.
yeah. I am talking about repos with hundreds of thousands (probably millions) of tests. Here's just one example of the scale: https://engineering.fb.com/2018/11/21/developer-tools/predic...

if you change a low level library that's the equivalent of the C++ standard library and you want to test the changes, you effectively have to rebuild the world. And you don't want to.
Thank you for the SNL video, Jimmy Carter talking down a young man who took too much acid is something I find highly plausible.
Ask HN: DeepSeek V3's AI Code Review Performance – A Reality Check with Data
I recently conducted a detailed benchmark of various LLMs for AI code review, specifically focusing on Pull Request analysis. The results were quite surprising and contradict some recent marketing claims.

Test setup:

Models tested: Mistral-Large-2411, Gemini 2.0 Flash (thinking-exp-1219), Mistral-Nemo-12B, DeepSeek V3, and "a ReAct AI Agent(also based on Mistral-Nemo-12B)" implementation

Consistent testing environment: Same prompts, temperature settings, and max_tokens (8192 for DeepSeek)

Test data: Real-world PRs from various open-source projects (all in English)

Evaluation: Results were assessed by Claude 3.5 Sonnet V2 for consistency

Results (in order of performance):

1. Gemini 2.0 Flash (thinking-exp-1219) - it has the best in depth code review result, but the output format could not fulfill requirement perfectly (compare with Mistral AI models)

2. Mistral-Large-2411

3. Mistral-Nemo-12B + ReAct AI Agent

4. DeepSeek V3

5. Mistral-Nemo-12B

Key findings:

- Despite recent marketing claims, DeepSeek V3 only marginally outperformed a 12B model from July

- The price-performance ratio is concerning, especially after their February 8th pricing changes

- Larger parameter count (671B) didn't translate to better PR review quality

For transparency: I developed LlamaPReview (<https://jetxu-llm.github.io/LlamaPReview-site/>), a GitHub App for automated PR reviews, which I used its core code as the testing framework. The app is free and can help you reproduce PR review efforts.

Questions for the community:

1. Has anyone else noticed similar performance gaps with DeepSeek V3?

2. What metrics should we standardize for comparing LLM performance in specific tasks like code review?

3. How much should marketing claims influence our technical evaluations?

Would love to hear your experiences and thoughts, especially from those who've tested multiple models in production environments.
Ukraine steps in as Russian wheat halt strains Syria
inefficiencies with private payers

Inefficiencies like billions of dollars in overbilling annually?
> Please explain exactly how you managed to put together a test suite that costs up to 50€ to run.

I'm not OP but have worked with them: have you considered a repo that might have tents of thousands of committers over decades? It's very easy to just have an insane amount of tests.
how about just spend a few minutes listening to an expert? the design of the airport was regarded as 'unbelievably awful'.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vjMRCG7Mjg

it is basically a crime endangering public safety.
> Then again I'd suggest that the majority of people participating on those sites are already employed, so they're not doing it for that benefit.

But the company benefits from less confusion and a better user experience. Companies are literally paying employees to provide content as it benefits the company.

I do believe there are people who freely choose to contribute with no strings attached, and I guess we'll learn in the coming years if people will contribute their time and effort for benevolent reasons.
No, that's precisely what they didn't do. Medicare has a schedule of anesthesia compensation rates broken down by procedure; the last time this came up on a thread, the schedule was literally posted. Anthem announced they were using it.
what makes you think that they don’t?
I was actually pleasantly surprised when I looked it up in an effort to "own" gp to see its etymology.
Providers overbill. Insurers inappropriately deny coverage. This is pretty basic stuff. What would insurer overbilling even mean? You pay a fixed premium.
Why are you moving the goal posts?

Go look for yourself.
I made a tiny library for switches and sum types in Lua
Yes, at this point. At the time, they were not.
Real way to fix healthcare: facilities based on repurposed container ships offshore near cities with lots of flights into them, to be outside of US regulations, staffed by physicians shuffled from Eastern Europe. Will offer more than an order of magnitude price advantage and will quickly squeeze the existing systems making it irrelevant until what's left of it is forced to change.
"In the U.S., gun death rates in this age group have increased by 106 percent since 2013 and have been the leading cause of death among this group since 2020."

"There were 2,526 gun deaths in 2022 among 1- to 17-year-olds, averaging to nearly 7 per day."

https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2024/guns-remain-leading-cause-...
Or you could just Google it. [0]

That's right. People can just Google things.

[0] https://i.imgur.com/1Yx0m1U.png
Because they

A) are not that capable and did not know about it

B) knew about it, but sat on it for their own egoistical reasons

Both are rather a bad look
> Hope that's working out for you. It's working out here for me.

Well, that is all that matters. We both will be dead soon anyway, so picking where to sit it out is important.
If someone has a 0 day backdoor to Windows, they can steal the credentials from the employees who are logging into those Linux servers.

Many high value servers don't have public IPs, and the really juicy ones are behind jump boxes. At that point the OS on the server isn't relevant.
I have been reading the license, it is CC by-nc then it is not free software.
I take it you haven't seen the documentary Weekend At Bernie's?
> What do you mean "if not parallelized"? Are you running tests sequentially and then complaining about how long they take to run?

Some CI runners are single core unless you pay more, some tests are very hard to parallelise (integration, E2E), some test code bases are large and unwieldy and would require a lot of cost to improve to allow parallelisation.

> Please explain exactly how you managed to put together a test suite that costs up to 50€ to run.

If you need to run a hefty windows runner on GitHub it’s $0.54 per minute, so a 90 minute full suite will cost $50.

You could be better with different tests running at PR/Nightly but if quality is a known issue some orgs will push to run total test coverage each PR (saw this at a large finance company).
It's faster. There are all kinds of vim modes and shortcuts in IDEs, but only in terminal you can turn off your mouse completely and just use the keyboard. It's also faster than any GUI program in terms of responsiveness, everything happens in an instant, and there is not a single animation, even when working with a 1GiB log-file. Vim is also a very robust tiling manager, convenient splits and navigation between windows, terminals and editing buffers out of the box.
What would insurer overbilling even mean?

It would mean something like this:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/19/business/dealbook/unitedh...

Or this:

https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/health-and-medicine/articl...
Ironically, because of the unbelievably bad infrastructures and general policies, Melbourne because a relatively affordable place to live in Australia. When other capital cities saw double digits property price growth, Melbourne prices actually went down.