skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nissan Leaves are supposedly notorious for having the worst battery longevitey of all EV:s, as they didn't include any thermal management at all in the first generation design.

I was researching them for a second car some years ago, and already then it seemed like many had lost almost half the range after 150kkm or so. That according to what people wrote in the ads when trying to sell them, so I assume it was not an overly pessimistic view. :-)

Congratulations on snagging one with excellent battery health. Perhaps your car spent its life in a very friendly climate, where the battery never got either hot nor cold?

Edit: For the record I've driven a few of them over the years and found them excellent A-to-B transport devices. Boring, but great.
So it doesn't check if you can actually host it (because it can't check, there is no other way than checking on your actual network)

Literally all it does:

if org belonging to ip contains wireless, mobile, cellular, verizon, at&t, t-mobile, sprint: IP is cellular (really bad way to determine if an IP is cellular or not by the way)

if IP belongs to asns 701, 6167, 22394, 21928, 23402: IP is cellular

if IP belongs to asns 7018, 20001: IP is not cellular

if none of above if statements match: IP is not cellular

if IP is cellular: no you can't

if IP isn't cellular: yes you can

That's it, that's the entire site.

And saying "Public-looking IP" doesn't make sense, you'll never get anything other than a public IP from icanhazip (or any other ip fetching service). Also having a cellular IP doesn't automatically mean you are unable to receive inbound traffic, some providers sell "mobile broadband" that allow you to open ports, etc.
the competitive investment world has gotten a flavor of ever-increasing requirements.. it fits with a scarcity model they thrive in
Is it a loss leader? I looked up the price of 16Gbit GDDR6 ICs the other day at dramexchange and the cost of 12GB is $48. Using the gamer nexus die measurements, we can calculate that they get at least 214 dies per wafer. At $12095 per wafer, which is reportedly the price at TSMC for 5nm wafers in 2025, that is $57 per die.

While defects ordinarily reduce yields, Intel put plenty of redundant transistors into the silicon. This is ordinarily not possible to estimate, but Tom Petersen reported in his interview with hardware unboxed that they did not count those when reporting the transistor count. Given that the density based on reported transistors is about 40% less than the density others get from the same process and the silicon in GPUs is already fairly redundant, they likely have a backup component for just about everything on the die. The consequence is that they should be able to use at least 99% of those dies even after tossing unusable dies, such that the $57 per die figure is likely correct.

As for the rest of the card, there is not much in it that would not be part of the price of an $80 Asrock motherboard. The main thing would be the bundled game, which they likely can get in bulk at around $5 per copy. This seems reasonable given how much Epic games pays for their giveaways:

https://x.com/simoncarless/status/1389297530341519362

That brings the total cost to $190. If we assume Asrock and the retailer both have a 10% margin on the $80 motherboard used as a substitute for the costs of the rest of the things, then it is $174. Then we need to add margins for board partners and the retailers. If we assume they both get 10% of the $250, then that leaves a $26 profit for Intel, provided that they have economics of scale such that the $80 motherboard approximation for the rest of the cost of the graphics card is accurate.

That is about a 10% margin for Intel. That is not a huge margin, but provided enough sales volume (to match the sales volume Asrock gets on their $80 motherboards), Intel should turn a profit on these versus not selling these at all. Interestingly, their board partners are not able/willing to hit the $250 MSRP and the closest they come to it is $260 so Intel is likely not sharing very much with them.

It should be noted that Tom Petersen claimed during his hardware unboxed interview that they were not making money on these. However, that predated the B580 being a hit and likely relied on expected low production volumes due to low sales projections. Since the B580 is a hit and napkin math says it is profitable as long as they build enough of them, I imagine that they are ramping production to meet demand and reach profitability.
I think the core idea is fine though. Kind of like random acts of kindness but as a team. I guess it's a respin on Habits for Humanity right?

I don't think it's idiotic. I think you're selling yourself short using that word. Try "silly".
I've been doing mostly backend dev, and watching from the sidelines as buzzwords come and go: vmware, virtualbox, puppet, vagrant, ansible, zookeeper, mesos, docker-compose, chef, etcd, docker-swarm, terraform, helm. I don't know what half of them do.

But honestly two of them stand above the others: docker and kubernetes.

Docker is what your program is, and kubernetes is somewhere for it to live while it's running.
Right but their statement (as i parsed it) was that the the "if it compiles it works" phrase is bullshit. Since there's some cases where it obviously won't be true.

At best it's ignorant of what that phrase means, in my view.
It's almost like life expectancies cannot be explained by a single variable, and the original claim that life expectancies went up thus plastics aren't bad is overly simplistic. Imagine that.
If someone wrote you a check for a billion dollars every year. You’d defend them too.
You are aware, that you are on a board of grinding workaholics, who work hard to have nobody escape the gulag of modern labor - by forcing everyone to grind their lifes to dust to compete with them?

That the processes we are part of have one purpose and one purpose only when it comes to social life, to force everyone to invest there whole social life into a company ? That half the apps written here, are to divide and conquer society and use the created misery and loneliness for additional upsales of the withheld happiness? That companies are actively antagonistic to anybody having friends and friendships?
I'd really like to have them. If I'm writing an algorithm that maps interval (0, 1) of probabilities onto different intervals of u32 integers, and probabilites are also represented as integers (an integer part of p*2^n), I will want to have different units for those integer probabilites and their mapped values. I don't want to mix them accidentally and to add probability and a mapped probability accidentally. Probably I dont want to add cumulative probability and a probability, though I'm not really sure about that, because sometimes I want to add (for example when calculating cumulative probabilities) and I want to compare them. Though maybe it will work with some exotic rules, like CumProb-CumProb -> Prob, while CumProb+CumProb is forbidden?

And there are more examples of that, I can have probabilities from different distributions, I don't want to add them accidentally, though multiplications of them is all over the place, so let it be. Of course I have no hope that any language could deal with the explosion of types that are needed to represent this, but if compiler just gave me f64 as a result of multiplication of probabilites, I'd be happy.

It can be done in Rust on case by case bases, but it is a lot of boilerplate. The issue is the typedef IntProb = u32, treat IntProb like an alias to u32 and rustc converts these types into each other silently like C compiler converts int to char. One can do struct IntProb(u32), but then it would be needed to implement traits like Add, Mul, Cmp and so on, which is possible but it is too much work. If it was possible to force rustc to treat typedef MyType = {NumericType} as a distinct numeric type that requires explicit conversion into NumericType, while retaining all the traits of NumericType, just substituting in them NumericType with MyType, it would be great.

I think, that all the complexities described in the article stem from the attempt to create an universal instrument that can do everything and to keep bees. The real difficulty is to pick a small subset of wants, that will cover 80% of needs, while being really simple. I see no issues with occasional .into::<Length<f64>>(), like I see no issues with (my_struc.index as usize), if I keep index as u8 to spare memory, but use it as usize of course. I see no need in different units for the same quantity, because in any case I'd want to convert everything into the same uniform units before I start adding and multiplying. But I'd like to have restrictions on available operations between different types, and I'd like to have a possibility to add optional dynamic checks for type value, that I could turn on for a debug build and turn off for a release one. For example, I'd like to check that any probability p fits into [0, 1].
perhaps it's not harder, but there's more comfort in solace?
everyone shouting at each other that their AI is better than their opponents
That's more because of the ozone layer.

While it's not good to use halon in a semi contained space like an airplane, it is incredibly effective at killing fire. It really sucks the heat out of it. Thus in most cases the fire is killed quickly and not much toxins are produced. This is important too because fire itself produces a lot of lethal toxins too, most people in a fire don't burn to death but get poisoned by the smoke.

So it's a big loss imo. I understand why because it's one of the most potent ozone layer killers. But still.. you're not using the stuff unless you have no other choice. If you're not using it it doesn't end up in the environment.

In this case it didn't work because the cargo bay in question was not fitted with extinguishers if I remember correctly.
That is not what Hikikomori means. Hikikomori is a complete removal of oneself from society often including family and work.
It does note his achievements, but had the man had any charisma at all, Silicon Valley might not have been. That the man was repellent is pivotal to the founding of Fairchild and thus all of the fairchildren.
Come be a professor in the Netherlands! You can even run a company on the side. Freedom is real. You don’t get paid well for it.
> In 2021, the Canadian agency ISED (Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada) recommended three approaches to the question:

> 1. Ownership belongs to the person who arranged for the work to be created.

> 2. Ownership and copyright are only applicable to works produced by humans, and thus, the resultant code would not be eligible for copyright protection.

> 3. A new "authorless" set of rights should be created for AI-generated works.

It seems obvious to me that the answer should be #1. An artist who creates works out of random paint splatters (modern art!) didn't purposefully choose the locations of their paint marks. However, they still own the copyright because they arranged for the creation of the work. You would never argue that a piece like this is uncopyrightable.
Of course it's Python people who come up with this nonsense...
SIDE NOTE: An underestimated attribute of using command line editors of olde is that they basically don't change. Yes, Vim is under development still, but the new features don't matter to me, because I don't track them and don't know what they are. All of the things I have ever done with Vim, Vim still does exactly the same way it did when I started using Vim.

I'm too out of touch with the IDE world to be sure they all have this problem, but at least the ones I used BITD would make changes that forced me to re-learn how to do things I already knew how to do before the change. I'm not against doing this entirely, but it needs to be done a lot more judiciously than most higher level tools do it. Code editing simply isn't an area where there are fast advances being made, so if your editor is making large changes, they are probably not advances, they're just causing you problems.
While I understand that this is your personal line and your decision, I don't understand how you mean "an actual human being is harmed".

Clearly no human being is harmed by smashing the windows of a private car. (assuming that neither the smasher nor anyone else gets hurt in the actual act of the smashing.) As a first order of approximation no human got harmed, they weren't even there when their car's window got smashed. As a second order approximation obviously we know the private car's owner will need to replace the windows which will cost them.

At the same time shoplifting from Walmart is also a cost which is born by everyone who shops at Walmart. Walmart will put that cost into the price of items. They will also put the cost of anti-theft items in the price of things too. Plus those anti-theft measures will harm the non-thieves by inconveniencing them. So everyone will pay just a bit more because of the shoplifting. These costs and inconveniences add up quickly.

Why is one of these costs within the line and the other is outside the line? What makes one of them "actual human being is harmed" while the other not?
For inference sure, for training: no.
There are East European languages, mostly Slavic ones, that have these weird double negatives which are grammatically correct and mean the opposite. A sentance such as: "I haven't never been there" means you've never been there.
I own my hard drive too, not sure how that's any different than paper.

And we can't ignore that ebooks exist.
Because copyright doesn't expire on human timescales and it's legal to use cryptographic methods to prevent compatible hardware/software, so things wouldn't be on an even playing field.

If you had to submit source code to the copyright office to be granted a copyright, and it expired after ~10 years (at which point the source is published), and anticompetitive, anticonsumer hardware locking methods were illegal, you'd be looking at a reasonable trade again, and copyleft would be essentially redundant.
Ask HN: Why isn't Alex Krizhevsky as famous as Ilya Sutskever or G.Hinton?
Despite the fact that the paper is named after him(AlexNet) and from my understanding they're(the 3 people named in the title)one of the reasons that Nvidia GPU became widely used for training Alex is not as popular as his peers/mentors? What happened to him?
OS X on a power Mac g4 quicksilver is a far better user experience in terms of responsiveness and consistency than raspberry pi os on a raspberry pi 3 even though the pi benchmarks faster.
I frequently wish I had a natural number type. So many programs would benefit from the type system guaranteeing that numbers are never negative.
"Kids having access to AI is too dangerous. Kids learning how to make explosives and LSD is perfectly safe."

Have a happy holidays.
The broader point being that every one of those licenses is just that -- a license. The terms of the license apply because the material is copyrighted.

And it's one place where you can directly specify your intent. In your license, say that everything reverts to the public domain in 5 years or 10 years. Grep away and show me how many licenses do that.

Varying durations for different types of media should be discussed as part of copyright reform. But simple statements like "10 years" reveal that people haven't thought things through.
I once created this tool for benchmarking JS: https://github.com/xpl/what-code-is-faster

It does JIT warmup and ensures that your code doesn't get optimized out (by making it produce a side effect in result).
If you're looking for a basic Linux box in the cloud to run some scripts, a $5 VPS/VM is the way to go.

Render operates one level above VMs and is better suited for full-stack production apps. (I'm the founder/CEO; AMA). Merry Christmas!
Some guy wrote a book recently and claimed that about 10% of workforce-eligible men are long term out of the workforce, due to some type of disability. Also 50% either aren't engaged at work or don't really do anything essential, meaning their job could disappear and it wouldn't be a huge impact.

https://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/econ_focus...

https://www.frbsf.org/research-and-insights/publications/eco...
Two seismic changes pushing Honda and Nissan into merger talks
Yes the copyright office ha already published guidance on the issue but journalists continue to skip over this as a primary source.
I disagree with your test criteria. It doesn't adequately support that entitlement is present in or applies to these people. You can be swayed by your feelings for a myriad of things, on its own I do not consider that any sufficient. Even if they come from a privileged background or gained a privileged status by virtue of studying where they did.

> you have to check your language if you want to continue productive discussion.

I disagree that my use of language was unreasonable. And to clarify, I do not wish to continue this conversation, productively or otherwise.
From what I read, AI "winters" have not just had less progress but also have had less research activity in general: during them, AI was seen as a dead end that didn't provide value, which translates to less funding, which translates to less people doing research on it (or introducing AI to the research they wanted to do already).
Having regular contact with a wife and kids makes you far from being a Hikikomori.
The AI winter refers to the collapse in government and industry funding. It came as a result of a lot of hype like expert systems not panning out but it was about the money that dried up. This time “it’s different” but VCs are just as fickle as grant reviewers and executives - that funding could dry up at any moment if one of the big AI companies has a down round or goes bankrupt altogether. I don’t think a second AI winter is likely because of how useful LLMs have proven this time around, but we’re probably going to have a correction sooner or later.

I don’t think the hiring slowdown and AI are related. Some companies are using rhetoric about AI to save face but the collapse in the job market was due to an end to ZIRP.
I’m glad you are willing to treat both groups the same. I suspect many on this site wouldn’t and would take pains to explain how they’re entirely different :)
This story plays out so often that here should be a law about it: Supply lags demand, prices soar, everybody hears about it, everybody pours in, supply surges, demand normalizes, supply overshoots demand, prices collapse. Already happened to software engineering, data science. Keeps happening to hardware production every few years. Sounds like AI research is headed that way too.
I am not so sure. An article is on the front page of the WSJ (online) about property taxes and insurance becoming more than the mortgage payments.

In parts of the country there's a crash in the works (Sunbelt, Florida in particular).

Where I live renting is substantially cheaper than buying, by thousands a month. You are absolutely better off buying a mutual fund with the difference and enjoying the flexibility of having cash.

I am not so sure what is going on in the housing market, but there is so little inventory in the hotspots, and what appears to be a dump in the no-longer-hot-spots, that it's scarier than buying stocks right now.
Now I i see how where talking past each other. I 100% agree that none of if the hyperscalers are currently (publicly) training on AMD silicon. I disagree with forward-looking statements like it "can't" happen, because I can guarantee you several of them are actively working on making it possible to train on AMD chips - that's just too juicy a target for a bonus packets all the way up to directors: "Our team saved the org $x0 million in TCO vy enabling training on MI300/MI400X in our new clusters"
> Israel is not pursuing a strategy of indiscriminate killing.

No they're pursuing a strategy of using intelligence and AI to strategically target "Hamas hideouts" which both conveniently for the state of Israel and in fact are often civilian structures, which result in tremendous "accidental" civilian casualties, which Israel is clearly incredibly broken up about as they continue causing them week after week.

In reply to both this and the other person who's asking for my solution: I don't know, because fighting insurgent forces in any area of the globe at virtually any time in human history has only rarely succeeded for the non-insurgent side, and universally that success came at the cost of numerous atrocities perpetrated against the insurgent forces and the civilians they hide amongst. The most powerful military on the planet tried this exact same thing in Iraq, and 2 decades and trillions of dollars later, we left the Taliban and ISIS billions of dollars in U.S. war materiel, and the state of Iraq such as it was was quickly overrun by those same forces which enjoyed at least some level of support among the civilians they were hiding with, probably because it's extremely easy, even if they don't think you give a shit about them, to explain to people that the other side shelling their cities to rubble every day are bad people that are trying to kill them. Shock of shocks, even civilians largely against the ideological positions of organizations like Hamas, end up more or less on their side, because again, the other side is Israel, who is actively killing them, accidentally or not making precious little difference to the people at the wrong end of their missile strikes.

I would say, with a grain of salt as I am not even remotely in this line of work, but I would say: when your enemy combatants are sheltered by a civilian population, do not possess a standing traditional army that would otherwise meet you on a field of battle, and are prepared to carry this out as long as your state is: then there is no solution, apart from killing everyone. The problem is the more civilians you kill in your quest to kill the combatants simply makes your combatants job of recruiting people to their cause even easier, because you killed their family in the previous bombing run. Ergo, the logical endpoint of this cycle is either returning to the stalemate that has persisted for decades now, where Hamas takes pot shots at Israel from neighborhoods, or the Israeli's just finishing the job and turning Palestine and what remains of her people into dust and corpses. Simply openly declaring that one state, Israel, and her people, have a greater right to exist than Palestine and her people do, and let that play out.

However, that is an ethnic cleansing, and IMO, still a heinous crime against humanity unless we're just going to plunk down some UN courts and say, once and for all, that a resistance movement fighting inside a besieged state is such an impossible strategic puzzle to solve, that it's okay to just obliterate the entire fucking thing. Which is an option, though I think it's a pretty horrific one.
My wife has a coworker like this.

Except I stead of bug reports, he just gets some crap code written and sends it to her assuming it can be dropped in and ran. (It is often wrong)
You can do both. You can invest the entire amount, but make it short/medium bond heavy on Day 1. As you go thru the year, you rotate more and more of your fixed income allocation towards equity until you reach your target equity %. This is relevant if, for example, you downsized your home or received a retirement payout.
Some of you may die, but it is a sacrifice I am willing to make.
>Which sounds similar to how gambling addicts report their thoughts on their addiction - that they are smart enough to learn poker, or they know enough basketball to be able to predict outcomes.

Some people are smart enough to learn poker, and build careers out of them. And there are many books on poker. You picked a poor example.
Gordon Mah Ung has died
When set up it works like a charm, I would say better than TLS. If you work at a place with a rigid IT department it sucks.
Use bum
Now we just need the comment telling us why only Japan was able to accomplish this task, or how their implementation is 100x better than any others.