skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Nice digging, that lines up perfectly with the observed behavior! I'll have to poke around and see if anything indicates that's the operational mode to be sure.

The failure mode was that one day I just noticed it was copying sequential data from another drive slower than it normally did. Don't recall it ever having been touched after install (it is the heatsinkless variant of the T705 4TB mounted on the motherboard m.2 hearsink for that slot). Temps always reported quite reasonable, even when under stress bench load (which was rare, the drive was just a secondary drive for loading games). Since then it's been popped between about 10 boards in confusion though haha. No cat yet!
Production of nuclear electricity is, to be fair, almost 5% of total.
Lamothermic – Lost Wax Castings (1996)
> Regardless of whether that was ever true, it was no longer so once we had Boeing using an aggressive MCAS to get the 737 MAXes certified.

Not quite true. The MCAS system operated by adjusting the trim of the horizontal stabilisers, but the adjustment was reflected by the cockpit controls (the trim wheels would spin). Pilots could reset the trim by adjusting the trim wheels, but the MCAS system would then adjust them back again. But there’s still a tight coupling between the input control and the control surfaces. It’s just that MCAS behaved like an unhelpful third pilot making uncommanded trim adjustments.

Yes even in an Airbus a pilot can change the control law in effect, and choose control laws that disable automations, and even choose a control law where inputs are directly mapped to control surfaces. But under normal conditions Airbus planes introduce a lot of various forms of automation between the pilot and plane, which interpret pilot intent from inputs, and then meet that intent by making many adjustments to multiple control surfaces, even though many of adjustments weren’t directly commanded. Unlike Boeing, where under normal conditions input controls behave as close as possible to traditional mechanical controls.

Ultimately it’s all much-of-muchness. Modern aircraft are so complex that flying them smoothly and efficiently is beyond the capabilities of a human. There’s just too many things to be monitored and adjusted. But there important distinction between being able to flight a plane safely vs efficiently, obviously all modern jet liners are designed to be possible to fly safely with zero automations, and direct pilot control of the aircraft. But simple safe flights aren’t enough anymore, we also demand smooth and highly efficient flights, which is where the automation becomes a necessity.

Another way of looking at this question of automation vs direct control, is to look at modern fighter planes. They’re deliberately designed to be aerodynamically unstable, and are effectively unflyable by direct control. That instability makes them unbelievably manoeuvrable, useful in a dog fight, but also requires that all pilot inputs have to be interpreted by a computer, which then does its best to produce the desired output by manipulating whatever control surfaces are needed, regardless of if the input would traditionally result those surfaces being manipulated in a mechanical system.
Recently drove a Dodge Hornet rental and it had a slew of physical climate buttons, most of which didn’t make sense or didn’t control what I wanted. In the course of trying to just turn on the defrost from the touchscreen, I turned on the heated steering wheel, stopped the airflow to the cabin, adjusted the driver side temperature way higher than I wanted, and probably subscribed to Disney+
> there is a very [tiny, very] loyal core of smart people

FTFY ;) Honestly, I love Raku - it's almost like Racket of the non-sexp world - but the community is microscopic, and the development is slow. It's a shame because, solely based on features and in terms of design, it's a serious contender for the most powerful dynamic language out there. It's packed with interesting features (junctions, phasors, traits, quote/unquote macros (soon), typed variables and subsets, coercible types, augment, OO system with multiple inheritance, interfaces, generics, multi-subs and multi-methods everywhere, custom operators including circumfix, regexes and grammars, etc, etc...) out of the box and it's actually really impressive how all these features work together in a cohesive design.

Unfortunately, the underlying implementation seems a bit chaotic; some features are either not fully implemented or specified, the performance could be better, and so on. So, while I love and still use Raku for almost all my scripting, if I were to start a serious project, I think I'd go with Common Lisp instead. CL has fewer features out of the box, but many of the missing ones are one `ql:quickload` away (or you can use CIEL), while the underlying implementation (SBCL in my case) is diamond-solid.

---

Aside: that `render` method could be sweetened a lot! For example:

tbody @!data.map: { tr .map(&td) } ==> table :border<1>

or:

tbody @!data.map(*.map(&td).&tr) ==> table :border<1>

or finally (using the fact that hyper descends into subarrays):

tbody @!data».&td.map(&tr) ==> table :border<1>

(I think Raku is unrivaled in one-liners!)
Grandmas can be growing it in heavily contaminated soils (old motor oil, lead, arsenic, etc.), or using ‘random weed spray’ at 10x its recommended dosage, or not washing their hands after using the toilet and then handling veggies, etc.
Those lines are from a song, and a significant part of the audience at the time wouldn't be listening in their native language; it's not really a fair comparison.
So even without the US, they still need the US
Where do you draw the line though. Is dressing in a swim suit allowable?
And it gives details about everything you could imagine. It’s a gold mine for train travel through Europe!
I don't think people like Nat Friedman are at risk of going to jail.
Podcasts, brrrrr

Audio works on the subway, on the bike, while riding a bike, cleaning the house and the big one, driving a car. To get into a situation where you can both watch and listen is much rarer.
How come? I thought he was the best in the world by a fair margin.
I understand that, and I'm saying the organisers also have the dress code principle, and stood by it when faced with 'oh but the violator is a very famous player, and this might make the news tomorrow'.

I think they come off better, personally. I'm not saying that should be the dress code, he shouldn't be allowed to wear jeans or whatever, or even that it's bad of him to decide not to play rather than to play in jeans. I just don't think 'it became a matter of principle' is a great argument for him, because it just makes me think better of the organisers for similarly standing by theirs.
Newpipe is great here too, as well as Freetube.
BT/Wifi on a single chip? Do you have a part number?

That'd be revolutionary.

I love the ESP32. But they love (too much) current.
I switched from Spotify from YT Music solely for UX reasons. Spotify is a weird flimsy thing to me (or at least was, back when I rage-quit it). Things like, their Android app didn't even have a "play album" button. Random simple stuff just was made needlessly hard. Queueing was weird, it seemed to nudge you to shuffling / algorithmic playback, they had this weird podcast thing going on that was just in the way, and so on.

YT Music on the other hand, has excellent UX in my opinion. This surprised me, given Google's generally mediocre UX design, but they really got a bunch of competent people on this one. All the basics work the way you'd expect (and that's not trivial to get right). Play, queue, play next. Play album, shuffle, it all just generally does what I expect it to do and I can mostly find the buttons I want easily. You can turn off autoplay. Gapless album playback is on by default. It.. just works!

Also I find the algorithmic autoplay to be pretty great, found some great new artists that way.

The fact that the catalog is bigger because it includes weird bootleg recordings and live sets and anything music-y ever uploaded to YouTube, is a nice bonus. But for me, the UX sells it.
A lot of manual jobs here. It's visually very beautiful. And there's an upbeat atmosphere of creating new things. Automation and offshoring has made these jobs to almost disappear in western countries.
lol there's a lot of B2B businesses who get their leads through linkedin... why is this an odd concept?
You make me laugh
If you can't make your own protons store bought is okay.
Trainline works well enough including refunds, seat selection, etc.

It can't book the Eurostar as part of a larger trip and there might be similar limitations.
Aaah..the usual brain-dead and brain-washed response. Eyerolling and tiresome quips about Putin and Moscow. Never been to Moscow nor Russia and I don't have their Visa, so not sure how I can even "return" to it.
My one and only 6 hour sleeper train was in Russia. It was cozy, amazing views at night, and they wake you when your destination is coming up.

I think when you share anecdotes like yours, its good to share anecdotes like mine, to balance it out :)
https://youtu.be/OAca0JsIQe4
In classical chess, yes; in Blitz and Rapid he's still one of the best, but there's lots of good competition.
So strange. As a non-brit, every comment I read uses John Oliver or Diane Morgan as an internal monologue and is incredibly witty and sarcastic.

To be fair, I'm probably less informed for doing so.
Compare to Lewis Hamilton being forced to remove jewelry and Max Verstappen being penalized for swearing. Petty officialdom loves to flex their puny muscles.
Comrad, I would expect you on this forum to not make it so obvious that you are the source of misinformation. Please, make it less obvious
I’m afraid that the risk of failing to understand my sarcasm is one my readers will have to take, unaided by sarctags and helpful expositions
It's not that I think the dress code is great, I just think it is what it is, and the one's who can say 'it's a matter of principle' (and get my sympathy anyway) are the ones that uphold that written code of the event, and don't waive it for a famous participant; not the famous participant who.. just wants to violate it basically.
Curious what others think about the state of technology when they were in spain
No, not that feature. HDMI supported 5V/55mA power out for years. It's meant for EDID ROM chips and maybe HDMI selectors too, not Linux based computers, but some TVs could take it in gross violation of specifications and its spirits.
I seem to remember stories back in the day about threatening ashtrays and flipped chessboards. Helmets might not be a bad idea.
I'm sorry but now we surely have lost the meaning of the word censored. Now it means not getting to play chess in a tournament?
In a world where things happened...
YouTube music's biggest issue is that it's run by Google. The second biggest issue is that they kill their best apps every 5-10 years. YouTube music is only recently getting to Google music parity.. the app that they killed 5 years back and replaced with YT music.

Also, they've ruined whatever they offered for podcast management when they killed google podcasts and tried to direct users to YT music -_-.
Ask HN: Anyone coding on the side only?
Curious to know if there are folks who don’t build software as their full time job that code on the side- what is your actual profession and what are you building? What motivates you to keep building software without making it your profession?
/s is would be more of an tone indicator for those who struggle to understand word communication portrayed by text.

In this case understanding the context of being sarcasm. It's annoying as you now have messages ending in /hj /lh.

Discord especially where the audience is young; but as we now cater to a world audience of those with disabilities and those without where do you tow the line?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_indicator
Did you even read what you posted ? "Its average per-stream payout rate is lower"
They did and I did
I would be more interested in YouTube music if it allowed users to play the audio of any video. Right now, a video has to be tagged by the creator as music for it to be made available on the app.
Cold, dead hands.
I had a good experience earlier this year on a Paris/Berlin/Vienna/Venice/Stuttgart/Paris loop using raileurope.com and nightjet.com

I guess it may be more expensive but I don't mind, I find the booking experience very clear cut as to what is refundable, what is nonrefundable etc, easy to pick which class for each segment and so on. no complaints.
> It's not a source of identity.

Lots of countries use ID's serial number as a sort of identity. Like, your bank would literally store "Mr. John Doe, G.I. ID 60-05 123-456-9012, D.o.B. 1985-07-29, etc." in your record, and when the next time you visit a branch and show them your new ID, it better have a "previously issued IDs" section on it with that old ID number there, so they would confirm that it's still you and update their record.
Other environments manage more casual dress codes without too much difficulty. I can’t wear a swimsuit to the office but I can wear jeans. No-one seems especially confused about where the line is.
Are you referring to your statement about how russia is innocent and is being targeted for no reason since they never invaded another country and there are many sources for their attempts at sabotage and even assasinations, as braindead? Yes, you are indeed speaking braindead comments. Just re-read what you wrote, and then think about the events of the last 2 years. Try harder comrad.
What I learned in my 4 years of open source development
While I agree that music has become more homogenized and crap than ever before, I think Rick here is just applying incorrect beliefs to this process. I think the only point he makes that is valid is that finding signal through all the noise is harder than ever (and is something that can be said about music, tv, movies, writing, nearly every creative pursuit).

Music is too easy to make? So people like producers and record executives don't have the power they used to. That's a good thing. The history of music proves this.

Music is too easy to consume? I legit don't know how to respond to this. Just because music isn't part of kids' identities anymore doesn't mean that's because it's too easy to consume. Times change, Rick. Whereas they used to share music now they share streamers and YouTubers.

The main argument that derails Rick here is in the first few minutes. He claims that music all sounds the same because of the tools available. He claims that music sounds the same because someone is comfortable with sounds that are familiar. He doesn't really say whether it's record companies or artists or consumers. Just some nebulous 'they'.

It's always been like that. Always. When a band gets popular, other bands pop up just like them to try to steal their popularity and money (Fats Domino and Chubby Checker is the oldest example I can think of without googling it). There are 'sounds' of decades. You can name sounds from the 50's, or 60's, or 80's, **all from way before this technology he's blaming existed.

Overall that video comes across as an old person who longs for the better days of their youth and is upset they can't make money in ways they want to. Welcome to the fucking world. Times change. Change with them or don't, it's your problem.
Well known data structures and algorithms are well know because they have been used more than three times. That said: if you are dealing with a situation where you have to implement them yourself, you may want to consider whether the rule of three applies. (Clearly this depends upon the situation.)
Do you have a peer reviewed source you could link on this approach, or is it something you thought of and are experimenting with yourself? I couldn't tell from the LMPlay repo in my skim, and the idea is intriguing
Personally I don't think "nofollow" and "noindex" are effective the way many webmasters think. I think they're a scam that Matt Butts came up to gaslight webmasters, right up there with all the other Matt Butts schemes to gaslight webmasters.

You're right though that you have to moderate the stuff. It's typical backwards Google Economy thinking that have to block spam to please Google (that's how an SEO spammer thinks, it's the only thing they think) as opposed to block spam so that your users will keep coming back. Letting your web site get spammed is like fertilizing your flowers with herbicide.
Exactly! The number of subscription saas apps that could be replaced by open source if there was a bring your own storage API would be astounding. This might be exactly why browser makers will not add it.
I think as-applied now, the author's take strikes a chord with me. LLMs are a technical marvel, but their results feel very cheap and tacky...it doesn't take much to catch at glimpse at the fallible man behind the curtain. They are lauded more for how impressive the illusion they render all things considered more than what they are actually GOOD FOR. Weird hallucinating search, smart but untrustworthy coding intern...people hold these things up in a way that suggests we've arrived instead of acknowledging their disappointment and saying "yes, there is a lot of power here, but we still haven't found the killer application or the thing that takes this from an impressive but flawed trick to indispensable".
No one is asking him to act like this. Many other greats across many domains manage to not be like this. His performance alone gets him loads of attention, and this is all just distractions.

And yes, people do drop out. It happens. Magnus is famously a very sore loser, however, so when he suddenly is a Dress Code Liberty Fighter to drop out, it should be called out for the ridiculous ruse it is. That people are actually celebrating it and talking about his principles...how profoundly gullible can people be?

The guy has an insane number of fanboys, however. It's absolutely bizarre.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Wagner_Group_plane_crash
Spotify maybe cheap compared to Netflix.

But it is way overpriced compared to Apple Music (definitely) and Tidal (arguably).

Not having lossless audio and paying artists less is ridiculous.
Precedent isn't as big a concern as many might think, most of Europe does not operate under a precedent-based justice system: it doesn't matter what were the previous decisions of courts on similar cases, the law is the only thing that matters.
China's ridiculous claims to waters outside it's legal territory are irrelevant to the issue of boarding Russian civilian ships in the Baltic Sea. In that area there's no doubt that the vessels are sailing through waters owned by various NATO member states. Russia acknowledges this. But the vessels are exercising the right of innocent passage under the law of the sea.

https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unc...

NATO members can and should find some other pretext to stop, board, and search some of those Russian vessels. But if Russia doesn't back down and sends them with Navy escorts what then? It's worth thinking through the various escalation scenarios before acting.
Nat Friedman leads the project. He was GitHub's CEO, among many other things. He funds many interesting ambitious projects, such as the Vesuvius Challenge (https://scrollprize.org/)
Site is probably just overloaded and it's not responding properly because of it.
Atheism is not a religion – it’s simply the absence of belief in gods. Religions involve organized systems of practices, rituals, and doctrines, none of which apply to atheism. Not believing in something doesn’t make it a belief system, just like not collecting stamps isn’t a hobby.
>If you want to encourage quality production, just subscribe for the month they are doing something good, ad-free of course, then unsubscribe.

Most people are probably lazier and less organized than you give them credit for. If subscribe/unsubscribe cycles were really that prevalent I think you'd see a lot more incentives to sign up for, say, annual subscriptions.

A lot of people basically use TV as background and, especially if they don't have live TV, that means a lot of streaming content.
Is Russia invading Poland and the Baltic states? Or did I miss the news?
Whenever I checked, trains from north Germany to Austria and back were always significantly cheaper on the ÖBB site. It was bizarre.
For me the value proposition is that there’s zero fragmentation. I know that by paying what I do for Spotify, I have access to pretty much everything. That’s worth a decent premium to me.

The problem with Netflix is the same as console exclusives in video games - fragmenting the ecosystem means I look at the service for the content it has vs the other services. But with Spotify it fills that niche entirely.
Man. I like that you’re bringing opera into the conversation, but I don’t think comparing two different mediums that way is useful.

Die Zauberflote is easy to understand because it’s a fairly light work, and you’re meant to be staring at the lavish staging and costumes. The performers narrate the action because that’s the convention for the genre - it’s a sung story. They break into more conventional dialogue for the recitative sections (a tradition that went out of style with Verdi.)
Why it shouldn't be? Is there any rule book which defines.
I think at this point in time it is inevitable for OpenAI to turn for-profit due to the mind-boggling costs of building and maintaining cutting-edge AI systems. However, they should open-source their technology (in the same way that Tesla has done it before, and still kept its industry leader status in many sectors).

I think moving towards open-source and maximizing transparency is the only way that can keep OpenAI reputable in the business.

Having said that, OpenAI does not seem to want to do that, at least from what we have read in the news so far, and it seems even their definition of "AGI" is all about making profit:

https://www.the79newsletter.com/p/openai-s-definition-of-agi...
SpiNNaker is an academic experiment to see if taking more cues from biology would make the models better — it turned out the answer was "nobody in industry cares" because scaling the much simpler models to bigger neural nets and feeding them more data was good enough all by itself so far.

> and they tend to be significantly more efficient

Surely you noticed that this claim is false, just from your own next line saying it needing 100 kW (not "kWh" but I assume that's auto-corrupt) for a mere billion?

Even accounting for how neuron != synapse — one weight is closer to a single synapse; a brown rat has 200e6 neurons and about 450e9 synapses — the stated 100 kW for SpiNNaker is enough to easily drive simpler perceptron-type models of that scale, much faster than "real time".
See I think how you feel about Spotify is exactly how I feel about Netflix. I don’t use the discovery of Spotify much, if at all. The value is the catalog.
Since train fans always like to point this out when it comes to flying: this is how far you can get in 8 hours on the train. It doesn’t include the time to get to the station, the buffer time you need (if your train leaves at 0700 you can’t plan to get there at 06:59), and the time to travel from the destination station to your actual destination. Actual travel time for an 8 hour train ride is probably at least closer to 10 hours if not more.
we moved across the country where we don't know anybody. i do not recommend this. having friends nearby is such an important aspect of mental health and overall joy in life.
Doesn't this remove the incentive for the US to protect Taiwan then?

I'm speculating, but if China invades Taiwan, it's cheaper for the US to bomb the fab in Taiwan to not let it get into Chinese hands in case of an invasion. They could additionally offer generous asylums to Taiwaneese researchers and engineers. Then whatever happens to Taiwan happens?
US banking is behind many developed countries due to security model mismatch.