skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think we might get these eventually in Golang, at least to a degree. In the end it's just a question whether they will be zero-cost like in Rust or incur some runtime overhead (I would assume the latter). Would be fine for me, I rely a lot on reflection for more complex use cases around dynamic typing and that already has a significant runtime cost (which is still ok in most cases).
I find 'tradition' to nearly always be merely an excuse to keep acting like a purblind fool. They're just a bunch of self-superior non-thinkers who don't give a damn about anyone from other cultures. They tend to lack curiosity or compassion, so, as such, they are really just a bunch of dullards.
Not tradition. From what I got over the internet, apparently (normal) jeans where allowed in the past and a lot of players were wearing them.
In 1980, Jimmy Carter's administration backed Chun Doo-hwan's military regime, giving tacit approval to the brutal Gwangju crackdown that resulted in the murder of thousands of civilians.

https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/1...
All models are wrong, but some are useful.

I thought you just used hydro on simple RLC circuits, and kept it at that?

For semiconductors there's no reason to invent a hydro equivalent that doesn't exist, what's the point? You want a model to be intuitive to the student, and a made-up thing won't be.

As you go further with EE, things also tend to turn into a sort of logic gate puzzle rather than a continuous (voltage-current) problem. That's a while other analogy whose limits you also need to know.
Nest thermostats have a heat and cool mode where you have setpoints for each. On older ones there was a limit on how close the two could be set.
There is a different opinion here:

https://discussions.apple.com/thread/8282686

Not sure what to make of it.

Is it possible to reach the server side of the Time Machine from the Mac itself? Has such a breach been demonstrated?
neat, thanks I'll update that.
> But the question remains, why is Rite Aid struggling so much?

Especially when it seems to me, in the Jersey suburbs outside of NYC, CVS and Walgreens are doing just fine.
> Open question, why do people keep caring about socials that much?

> Especially educated people should stay away from that toxicity

I believe commerical, closed social networks are the ones that specifically breed this 'toxicity' people talk about. They're incentivised to promote engagement bait to drive DAU, page views and ad revenue.

Granted, it's audience is significantly smaller, but I think Mastodon immediately showed what a social network that had incentives aligned with users could look like. Bluesky has neat features putting users in control, like user-built custom moderation settings to hide things you don't want to see (like engagement-bait accounts, politics, spoilers, gaming etc). I think these are all user-centric features that Twitter or Facebook would never add people they conflict with their other business goals of promoting ads or other partner content.
I think we should list the sites where this fingerprinting is done. I have a suspicion that Microsoft does it for conditional access policies but I am not sure of other services.
Are redheads with blue eyes going extinct?
GW have been trying to add diversity to Warhammer for ages. Most of it is good actually?
One problem in dealing with large, young companies (especially tech) is that most of them have a sense of entitlement.

I.e. "Sure, you have/are ____, but we're ____. We're the real big deal."

I know Google was essentially laughed out of a Maps partnership inside a major warehouse retailer because Google refused to consider sharing the collected data with the retailer. "You wouldn't know what to do with it" was a direct quote.

It feels like legacy Hollywood, for all its faults, understood how to square ego circles better to get deals done.
Well it's something she is at least invested in and cares about as a narrative and product, whereas Amazon solely wants to turn it into money.

I don't think we're looking for heroes, necessarily, but if you care about a franchise, you want someone who cares about it deeply enough to preserve its ethos.
This is definitely a real effect. I can’t doodle this out right now but if you grab a piece of paper and draw out the triangles for a pinhole camera with different focal lengths you can see how the angles (and horizontal separation at the image plane) are quite different with different focal lengths.
>That would obviously inconvenience some people, but the gist of the criticism is that the US duplicates medical capacity for the sake of convenience.

I work for a hospital chain that has done similar things. A lot of the failing hospitals in little towns across the US is because of this, and the consolidation that's happening is to remove similar inefficiencies. People that live in these little towns with failing hospitals see any move towards correcting these inefficiencies as evidence that our medical system is failing and use it to vote for right wing politicians who make empty promises.
I mostly enjoyed Rings of Power, particularly Season 2, despite its differences from the source material and the atrocious direction and editing in some episodes
I can see your point, the issue is that those rare insightful interactions are buried under tons of scrolling, irrelevant content, and people desperately trying to get noticed for whatever reason.
Why didn’t you edit it at the time?
Did you use 2FA before? I use it, possibly they deem my security good enough because of that?
This kind of panpsychistic talk to me ends up feeling more closer to a reductive materialism than what I would firstly associate Chalmers with ("hey, did you forget you can experience stuff?"), which is probably just my ignorance with his work.

Because yes, you acknowledge "experience", but you make it a function of a physical state described in such and such a way. In the same way that a set of particles at points A, B, C, .. correspond to such and such a (e.g. electric) field strength at point Z, we now imagine it could correspond also to such and such an experience.

It's just barely "experience" on its own terms. and elicits a kind of epiphenomenalism and powerlesness. The thermostat*, after all, doesn't choose anything nor does it profess to have any agency. So agency ought to end up some kind of ephiphenomenal "observable" of a system.

But besides being deflationary in this distasteful way, what bothers me with pictures like this is that they make use of entirely subject-made divisions between objects and their environments, and presume that they might correspond to experiences because - why not? Why not thing of the bottom and upper half of thermostat as corresponding to two fields of experience? Or the quarters, sixtheents, and so on until we get to individual atoms.

The thermostat doesn't "care" if I think of it as the wax and glass separately, or as a single object containing both. But we do have a unified field of experience, and it doesn't matter how another person "cuts us up" in their mind, whether it is as atoms interacting, organs behaving in unison, or just as a "body".

It seems silly to say that between me and Bob having our separate experiences, there is an experience corresponding to "me and Bob", supposedly free-floating somewhere just by virtue of the two of us being cognizable as a physical system.

It turns "experience" and that infamous "qualia" from something that's the most direct and obvious to a weird phantom as the output of a presumed equation which maps some description of a physical state to an "experience".

No wonder you'll find people who'll retort that they don't experience things or that their consciousness is illusory - they have these weird detached notions of experiences to fight against.

* I imagined a thermometer throughout reading this piece, hence the mention of wax and such. It doesn't really change the point so I'm leaving it.
AI-driven economy will sell your decisions before you take them, researcher warn
>>> If we decouple the idea of a physical house from the idea of a home, then "homeless" people might actually have homes -- a spot they feel secure in, a place they return to.

You're clearly missing something here. Nobody is using the term "homeless" to refer to people with a spot they feel secure in.
A Yubikey purchased today actually allows 100 discoverable credentials. Keys running older firmware stored a max of 25.
That was Craig's request as a way to close out his series. They will start fresh with a new timeline.
Ok. I guess we all agree that being unhoused is not a problem
Does anyone play a human constantly holding a torch?

Usually everyone forgets until vision and sight matter (boss fight, in a fog, or down to the wire).
I don't think Twitter was required for someone with a rather good track record/cv like yours to get good jobs.
No one is making you care what Stephen King has to say. You don't need to idolise someone just to be interested in things they might say

You're here in the comments of Hacker News so you clearly are interested in social networks. You reguarly check in here to see popular links others have shared, and occasionally participate in conversations. It's seems pretty easy to understand that others might be interested in a slightly different UI on top of this.
Nvidia opens the Run:AI code, the software it acquired for 700M dollars
Putting the cost of a pack of cigs in a retirement account everyday would be a better plan given their price.
An added challenge: Yubikey NFC doesn't work on iPad, only iPhone. USB operation also seems fraught. This has been so for 7+ years now. If Apple cannot get this to work with a closed ecosystem and the leading vendor, I think the technology is just not ready for mainstream.
It's Bond. A certain resemblance is necessary. It doesn't suffice to add a few Martinis here, a PPK there, and end with a showdown against a super villain involving tech gadgets. The movie also needs sexism and humor, at least.

Seriously, reinventing Bond while modernizing it but keeping it a Bond movie is challenging. A challenge that people should accept.
Canadian Tuxedo.
You mean like on Android? Hell nowadays you can choose "approximate location" instead of tracking people. App permissions have come a long way.
It's a fork, going back some years (2017 or so).

It's instructive to look at the activity level of pcem (their forum, and their github account: https://github.com/sarah-walker-pcem/pcem/commits/dev/) versus 86box ( https://github.com/86Box/86Box/commits/master/ )

86box has a vibrant community around it (pop in the discord some time!) which PCEM really doesn't as far as I'm able to tell.

Yes, there is a lot of bad blood -but I would suggest taking any stories that you hear (but did not witness yourself) with a huge grain of salt.
Not required, but it could present opportunities.
Thanks for the recommendations!

I have read Thomas Metzinger's Ego Tunnel (2009), but as far as I understand it, he takes on a naturalist standpoint, and assumes that consciousness arises from that.

I prefer to take a radical agnostic point of view, where consciousness does not even have meaning outside of those who experience it. Implying that "meaning" or "reasoning" make no sense universally.
I don’t understand the hate for Amazon’s LotR compared to what they did to Wheel of Time! I’ll admit I’m not a huge LotR fan, but I didn’t hate the time I spent watching the Amazon adaptation. Wheel of Time though, they drove a truck through that poor franchise. Then backed up over it, and drove over it several more times!
(2023)

Last submission and discussions with 221 comments.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35058176
congrats. your problem is solved in the two or three places that actually allows or even implements any logic from N passkeys. on most places that will just give you a new account or wipe the first key.
I don't know all the history, but Magnus comes off as above the game.

“I am playing at least one more day here in New York and, if I do well, another day after that,” Really? And I saw another quote that said "f*k you"

Whatever his frustrations are with the governing body, the above are unacceptable behavior. I don't understand why they need to bend over backwards and modify the rules and mollify him.

He has also accused another player of cheating, after he lost, then he settles out of court. And he doesn't want to participate in the world championship, but chooses to make comments about the quality of games.
Yeah but we wouldn't do that. It doesn't make sense to pay the energy conversion costs; it is already more efficient to store power in non-oil batteries.
The article clearly isn't talking about technical debt within the kernel implementations of epoll and kqueue, and if one wanted, it'd be easy to define fallback EVFILT_READ/WRITE filters using a device's poll implementation.

I don't really understand what argument you're making. Is io_uring also a bad design because it requires new file_operations?
Maybe we can go with a bit more of nuances here. Uninhabitable is probably an "overstatement", as in, if all human civilizations collapse globally consequently to its collective hubris, chances are good that other species will thrive in this very different world. We can even suppose continuation of some humans but with different life modalities.
I feel that there is an alternative way of approaching the question: to propose that it is only meaningful to ask what it is like to be an X if the X has certain mental abilities, such as some sort of self-awareness of itself as a participant in a wider world. How would we go about evaluating and choosing between these two views, and is there room for there being degrees of 'what it is like' and self-awareness? It is almost as if we are trying to write the dictionary definition before we know enough to complete the job (which is not necessarily a bad thing, unless we assume that by making a choice, we have, ipso facto, filled in the previously-incomplete knowledge.)

I definitely take issue with Chalmers' opening sentence of his final paragraph: "… A final consideration in favor of simple systems having experience: if experience is truly a fundamental property, it seems natural for it to be widespread." I feel he is putting the cart before the horse here - something that seems quite common in the philosophy of mind - by first deciding that experience is a fundamental property, and then using it to justify the assumption that it is widespread. This strikes me as almost circular, as it seems one could at least as reasonably justify it being fundamental on account of the arguments for it being ubiquitous.
You can't possibly miss the huge difference between a discussion board and doom scrolling machines.
Well, then there's no point (heh) in buying one.
Users will be faced with a dialog saying "to use Facebook, you must accept XYZ", and their only options will be to accept or to not use the app. Facebook will detect empty or fake data and lock the user out unless they acquiesce.
> but as far as I can tell, the "solution" to this is to turn my resume into a low-quality SEO-spam piece of shit so as to try and satisfy the most incompetent person who might read it.

If a posting gets 500 applications (which is about how many apps the last 4 roles I’ve listed got before we closed them) and we have an engineer spend 5 minutes per resume reading through each resume, that’s a full week of engineer time spent on screening alone. That’s not a good use of time when most of the resumes are a straight no.

I’m assuming your writing style is different in professional environments, but if it’s not, and I saw even like 10% of the snark you’ve put here, I’d instantly dismiss you unless we were hiring for a principal into fellowship IC role and you were a 100% match.

If you’re writing your resume to be read by software engineers or sysadmins, you’re writing for the wrong audience. That’s not their fault for being “incompetent”, it’s yours.
Sure, I guess. But the whole discussion is so void of subject matter knowledge that it's like trying to argue the pros and cons of different bowling balls in terms of how well they pair with Brie.

Nikon is an optics company that's also made cameras for a long time, and then very nearly didn't; before the Z mirrorless line took off, the company's future as a camera manufacturer was seriously in doubt. But even a Nikon that had stopped making cameras entirely after the D780 would still be an optics company. There is no serious reason to assume the necessity of some sensor/ISP "special sauce" behind the novel optics announced here to make the system work. And considering where Nikon's sensors actually come from, if there were more than novel optics involved here, I'd expect to see Sony also mentioned in the partnership.

Of course that's not to say photographic art can't be made with commercial or industrial equipment; film hipsters notwithstanding, pictorialism in the digital era has never been more lively. But I would expect this to fall much in that same genre of "check out this wild shit I did with a junkyard/eBay/security system installer buddy find", rather than anything you'd expect to see on the other end of a lens barrel from a Z-mount flange.
It’s because the hard “problem” isn’t the shelter piece.

The hard problem is how do you house a lot of mentally unstable people who can often be a danger to themselves and others at the same density as the rest of the city and at an affordable cost.

I don’t think it’s generally possible because as soon as you hit any kind of density with these you get problems, but you need a minimum density to provide bathrooms showers and services.
The best solution that I’ve seen is forcing builders to incorporate 1-2 subsidized units into every new building, as that distributes the problem around in a manageable way. Still that likely will not yield a quick solution and may never hit the required number of units.
I got a friend who is a proper 40k guy (paints, mini-dolls, the lot)(I call them mini-dolls instead of figures or figurines to piss him off, and it works!!!).

He was initially excited to see "Superman" being involved, but now he also fears that this would turn to a shitshow.

Worse case it tanks, Amazon has yet another TV failure, and the fans continue to enjoy their mini-dolls and pretend-battles.
This is simultaneously a brilliant idea and hilarious because I can imagine how this must confuse them.
>but given waste cleanup is paid for by the tax payer and is an ever increasing cost/problem, banning products needlessly adding to rubbish when inexpensive reusable alternatives makes sense.

Why not tax it instead?
Awesome, I hope you like some of the ones you haven't seen!
until the time comes that it's used for spammers and everyone requires providers from a list that only included apple and Google.

y'all trying very hard to not see where this will go.
I agree it's a bit weaker, but you're still paying $20 + tax for ChatGPT on a monthly subscription (or more). You could switch next month, you might regret it and switch back the month after. You might anticipate that faff and not switch to begin with.

(Sure you might say I'll subscribe to both, $20, $40, it's no big deal - but the masses won't, people already agonise over and share (I do too!) video streaming services which are typically cheaper.)
AFAIk it's extremely difficult. Even white-hat iOS forensics revolves around (ab)using old exploits in unpatched iPhones in order to access data.
AI companies cause most of traffic on forums
Dude they tried to force you to log in with your Facebook account to use your hardware. Everything made by that wretched company is tainted.
Real life clip of Jeff Bezos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtRzkcoXIlg
NDR (Net Dollar Retention) in a business like this is the key metric for determining whether there's a business or customer base worth acquiring here. With Bench's rumored churn in recent years, their existing investors which includes top funds like Bain and reputable ones like Inovia (which is top Canada) would've had the opportunity to invest first. Clearly they didn't.

With a rumored 2024 revenue of $54.9m in 2024, and peak valuation at $230m+ (4x Rev which isn't unreasonable to pay even for a tech-enabled services business), churn would've been really bad for this deal to end up here.
Some of this is pretty simple, though, at the coarse-grained level. If you have a frontend and a backend, and you change the backend, you run all backend unit tests, backend component tests, and the end to end tests. If you change the frontend, you run the frontend unit tests, the frontend component tests, and the end to end tests.

To stop the problem you mentioned you can either tick the box in Github that says only up to date branches can merge, or in Gitlab you can use merge trains. "Running tests on an older version of the code" is a bigger problem than just this case, but in all cases I can think of enabling those features solves it.
He was also I think the first big internet casting controversy, although everybody's kind of forgotten that now.
I’m expecting more of a cyberpunk reality where governments continue to lose power to massive corporations run by oligarchs. You could argue that the aristocracy never really left, but it’s certainly been consolidating power since 2000. Part of the aristocracy still believes in the lessons which lead to the enlightenment, and I suspect many other families will re-learn them in the coming decades. It’s not exactly fun to be an oligarch in a totalitarian country after all, and throughout history the most successful have always gravitated toward more “free” societies if they could. Because it’s better to live in the Netherlands than to have the king of Spain seize your riches. I’m not too worried AI will give us social points the way they do in China. I am European so that helps, and the US would frankly have a hard time making it worse for the lower class citizens anyway. If anything the increased access to knowledge might even help educate many people on just how bad they have it.

I’m sure you’ll see bad actors who use AI to indoctrinate people, but at least as long as there is so much competition it’ll be harder to do that than what is happening in more totalitarian states where LLM answers are propaganda.
I wouldn’t use this in production, but this was in HN earlier this year and I love the idea: https://github.com/borgo-lang/borgo
> who gives a shit about famous people? authors I assumed died decades ago? Literally I do not give a single shit what Stephen King or JK Rowling thinks

I meant, like, Joyce Carol Oates; who I had mentally placed in the same "historic personage" category as Sylvia Plath and Angela Carter before learning she had a twitter account.

And, yeah, it's somewhat toxic to engage in idolatry; yeah, I would more profitably spend my time trying to become a research director or founder myself. Having John Carmack like my Arxiv recommendation isn't an achievement, the way inventing the fast inverse square root algorithm is. But it sure does feel nice!
While I prefer a Bond movie, after seeing how Amazon handled Jack Reacher, they might be able to do some sort of mini-series.

As long as James Bond is a white, British male. You can't change the character after all this time, just for the sake of changing it. If they want to make someone else "007," fine, since someone will get the license Bond retires or gets killed.
Clever :p

To be fair, Parliament forced a delay from Oct 2019 to Jan 2020, to ensure that there was some sort of agreement in place. And then it passed because there was a one-year transitionary period until Jan 2021 during which the UK stayed in the single market.

And now we've voted in a PM who promises building closer ties with the EU. And eventually the generation that rabidly voted to leave will disappear. Progress marches on slowly.
Being far-right is not what made /b/ a wasteland, so that doesn't surprise me at all.