skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
To a certain extent as long as you recognize your limitations you can brute force the additional iteration required to expand or verify your output to match that of someone with a larger mental context window / parallel processing capacity.

You can use tools and external logging / notes to expand your workflow as needed.

The real danger is when you don't know what you don't know and think you're done prematurely / in an error state.
We're just missing a cigar and a dream about trains here.
Being in the midlands of Ireland, I say ye; but I believe that yous is more of a think in Dublin and the north.

(In practise, I write ye more than I say it, I think.)
Agents, Assemble: A Field Guide to AI Agents
Using duckduckgo video search opens the video on the search results page, playing there plays without ads, I get the “sign in to confirm you’re not a bot” message sometimes though.
Aaaah thanks for the explanation. PANEL of 10 humans, as in, they were all together. I parsed the phrase as "10 random people" > "average human" which made little sense.
oh, no - but most queries aren’t being filtered by supervisor models nowadays anyways.. most of the refusal is baked in
All That Is Solid Melts into Information
ScholarlyArticle: "Quantum teleportation coexisting with classical communications in optical fiber" (2024)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10738
The wallet name was exodus, how fitting :D
Looks like it's not updated for nearly a year and I'm guessing Gemini 2.0 Flash with 2m context will simply crush it
I recognize that you may be stepping back from this discussion, but I think it's important to address these inconsistencies in your earlier reasoning:

Your logic is inconsistent on multiple levels. You won't eat fish because "it was alive" but accept eggs from an industry that kills hundreds of millions of male chicks. You claim honey and milk are fine as "byproducts," but this ignores how dairy cows must be forcibly impregnated, separated from their calves, and killed when production drops, while honey is literally the bees' food that we take, often killing many in the process. These aren't benign side effects - they're fundamental to how these industries operate.

You claim to only support "ethical" animal products while acknowledging industrial meat production is inhumane, yet fail to recognize that "ethical" animal agriculture is simply not scalable to feed the global population. These distinctions you're making (McD's vs butcher, etc.) are arbitrary moral lines that serve more to make you feel better about your choices than to address the fundamental ethical issues. After sharing your perspective on these broader ethical concerns, falling back to "it works for me and my family" isn't a meaningful response to systemic issues affecting billions of beings.
It is somewhat amusing that Leary had a period of saying that computers were the new drugs (“PC is the new LSD” or something)
If you take an electrical sensory input signal sequence, and transform it to a electrical muscle output signal sequence you've got a brain. ChatGPT isn't going to drive a car because it's trained on verbal tokens, and it's not optimized for the type of latency you need for physical interaction.

And the brain doesn't use the same network to do verbal reasoning as real time coordination either.

But that work is moving along fine. All of these models and lessons are going to be combined into AGI. It is happening. There isn't really that much in the way.
That doesn't map to safety or danger at all. It's purely a way of opting out of the developer having to pay the Apple tax.
I hear you, and agree there’s not much overhead in basic quality, but it’s a bit of a strawman rebuttal to my point. The fact is that the best code is code that is fit for purpose and requirements. But what happens when requirements change? If you can anticipate those changes then you can make implementation decisions that make those changes easier, but if you guess wrong then you may actually make things worse by over-engineering.

To make things more complicated, programmers need practice to become fluent and efficient with any particular best practice. So you need investment in those practices in order for the cost to be acceptable. But some of those things are context dependent. You wouldn’t want to run consumer app development the way you run NASA rover development because in the former case the customer feedback loop is far more important than being completely bug free.
For a second I got excited, because I thought Mangione was being charged with actual dueling, à la Burr and Hamilton. Then I read the article and realized it was talking about conflicting charges, not charges of dueling, and suddenly the story was much less colorful.
its not like sonnet, yes current ai tools are increasing productivity and provides many ways to have chance to be rich, but agi is completely different. You need to handle evil competition between you and big fishes, probably big fishes will have more ai resources than you. What is the survival ratio in such a environment ? Very low.
That's a windows-ism, we don't like that kind of stuff. Not on any other OS we don't.
Hey, I’m probably not the best person to give an answer for this, but since you’re not getting comments…

To keep track of progress, you could create dashboards, maybe using Python or JavaScript. Would managing the git repo include CI/CD? The role sounds like it involves some DevOps components. If so, push for access to Python so you can automate some of these tasks. Sounds like it involves some project management stuff as well, so you could take the opportunity to learn how to set stuff up in Jira (if that’s what is being used).

Do you have a CS degree? If not, I’d suggest starting an online CS degree such as Oregon State University’s or the Georgia Tech masters. Get a feel for how intense the job will be first though. I suspect that, since it’s public admin in the EU, and if you’ve been able to automate some tasks, it will be fairly relaxed. Doing a degree while working full time is still exhausting though.

Look up job descriptions for DevOps , or try to find to find the role it most closely matches with, and go deep. Find an excuse to use the tools/methods typically used in the job postings you see, and you’ll be in a good position to find one of those jobs after a while. If they won’t allow you to, practice using those tools outside of work, or get involved with open source projects.
I 50/50 agree with you. My issue is the bait and switch feel it has to it, for both artist and audience. Spotify holds all the power. They already pay less for Discover Weekly streams, instead using that old music industry classic "exposure". If they really care about artists (like their marketing claims), perhaps they can add a filter for playlists that contain PFC vs not?

I'm just rambling without much explanation sorry, but I'm gonna hit the reply button anyway!
I was a psych major in undergrad, and did an experiment as a riff on stereotype threat and got a small effect. I had the participants solve brain teaser puzzles and the only difference was introducing them as coming from 11th grade or graduate level math. Undergrads did worse when they thought it was graduate level.
Grayjay dev here, that's a bug, I wrote it down. You can probably work around it for now by logging out -> restart app -> log back in.
Yeah, consolidate all of them into three VATs: Contiguous US VAT, Oceanic US VAT and Alaska VAT.
Yes, the last mile is walked. That’s the problem. It’s not practical to put a train station or bus stop at every corner. This is why cars exist everywhere. If those cars can be automated they can be shared even more efficiently than Ubers and allow more efficient bus and train routes.
No, but the 'correct amount of calories' is a steadily decreasing number, so it requires constant adjustment.
This is expressed in AI research as Moravec's paradox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravec%27s_paradox

Getting to LLMs that could talk to us turned out to be a lot easier than making something that could control even a robotic arm without precise programming, let alone a humanoid.
What do you use Claude for?
This is insanely expensive to run though. Looks like it cost around $1 million of compute to get that result.

Doesn't seem like such a massive breakthrough when they are throwing so much compute at it, particularly as this is test time compute, it just isn't practical at all, you are not getting this level with a ChatGPT subscription, even the new $200 a month option.
The author is in the UK and covers most of that in the article.
Once you buy a Mac, Apple doesn't own it anymore, so them not wanting you to run a piece of software isn't a good reason why you shouldn't.
I've found gemini-1206 to be best. and we can use it free (for now), in google's aistudio. It's number 1 on lmarena.ai for coding, and generally, and number 1 on bigcodebench.
LockBit Ransomware Developer Arrested in Israel
From a practical standpoint, scaling test-time compute does enable datacenter-scale performance on the edge. I can not feasibly run 70B on my iphone, but I can run 3B even if takes a lot of time for it to produce a solution comparable to 70B's 0-shot.

I think it *is* an unlock.
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with wanting a particular outcome. It wasn’t wrong that people were excited about the prospect of a room temp superconductor a few months back because people knew that if it were true good things were possible. Insisting that you can’t be excited by one potential outcome from a study means that you’ll only study things that don’t have the potential to help
I suspect it's mostly irrelevant.

ARM should be able to re-file the lawsuit and get financial damages out of Nuvia, which Qualcomm will need to pay. But I doubt the damages will be high enough to bother Qualcomm. I don't think ARM will even bother.

As far as I could tell, this was never about money for ARM. It was about control over their licensees and the products they developed. Control which they could turn into money later.
It's a vehicle and fairly hard to search.
My answer is trying to get out of their influence (change of job/area), or ascending over them.

Many people put minimal effort because they chose the wrong career, they don't have love for the profession, or plainly have bigger interests in life besides work, which they see only as a means to an actually worthy goal.

That being said, unless you're far from the average, there will be people smarter and dumber than you. They might be a genius reading office politics, making carpentry, fixing a motorcycle, math, etc., but they're not as smart as you at your job, and they probably don't desire to.

The best you can do is not depend on them if you can, and if you can't, cover your back, have everything in writing, don't let their mistakes tarnish your professional reputation. Don't forget to be kind, you're doing what's best for you, not destroying them.
Beyond Collaboration:Reimagining Organizational Structures in View of Strong AI
Please remove "Also available on FDroid" from the page. This app is not available on F-Droid and isn't allowed to be added to it since it isn't open source.
> Swiss Army Robinson

It might as well have been, but I think you meant to say "Family" :-)
> When none of us have jobs or income, there will be no ability for us to buy products. And then no reason for companies to buy ads to sell products to people who don’t have money. Without ad money (or the potential of future ad money), the people pushing the bounds of AGI into work replacement will lose the very income streams powering this research and their valuations.

I don't think so. I agree the push for AGI will kill the modern consumer product economy, but I think it's quite possible for the economy to evolve into a new form (that will probably be terrible for most humans) that keep pushes "work replacement."

Imagine, an AGI billionare buying up land, mines, and power plants as the consumer economy dies, then shifting those resources away from the consumer economy into self-aggrandizing pet projects (e.g. ziggurats, penthouses on Mars, space yachts, life extension, and stuff like that). He might still employ a small community of servants, AGI researchers, and other specialists; but all the rest of the population will be irrelevant to him.

And individual autarky probably isn't necessary, consumption will be redirected towards the massive pet production I mentioned, with vestigial markets for power, minerals, etc.
> “In fact it is known that DOS 2.0 could not be built on PCs at all, and was built on DEC mainframes.”

Nitpick, but DEC never made a mainframe. Their products like the PDP-11 were considered minicomputers (even though the CPU was the size of a fridge) to distinguish them from IBM’s mainframes and medium sized computers.
Yes, people tend to focus on current times. It's an incredibly shortsighted mentality that selfishly puts oneself over tens of billions of future lives being improved. https://pessimistsarchive.org
The situation has since changed as the solver is rewritten. (Upstreamed from the work done in mamba.) I encourage you to try again.
There are teabags made from plastic?? That's the dumbest thing ever! Paper seems to work pretty well, I don't think I ever had a problem with the thousands of tea bags I have used in my life.

This can't be cheaper to manufacture than paper bags, can it...and you can't compost them (no, PLA is not compostable)

Why is this even a thing?
Why wasn't it supported all along? Doesn't basically every text field support it by default?
Some cryptocurrency hardware wallets such as Trezor's are usable exactly how you want: they support fido2/webauthn and derive their keys from the recovery seed phrase. You can write down the recovery seed phrase, initialize other hardware wallets with the same recovery seed later on, and they will present to a computer as the same fido2/webauthn token.
You sound like a rich person.
Isn't there research showing that people are smoking less weed in the places it's been legalized? It lost its "cool factor" after that.
Look into DeArrow
https://dearrow.ajay.app/

Cuts down a ton of crap and shows you thumbnails and titles of things for what they really are.
Wait, are most of the people having problems in this thread using windows? It's been mentioned a couple of times, but not by most.
Strange indeed if we work under the assumption that the profits from this productivity will be distributed (even roughly) evenly. The problem is that most of us see no indication that they will be.

I read “no one will have a chance to be rich anymore” as a statement about economic mobility. Despite steep declines in mobility over the last 50 years, it was still theoretically possible for a poor child (say bottom 20% wealth) to climb several quintiles. Our industry (SWE) was one of the best examples. Of course there have been practical barriers (poor kids go to worse schools, and it’s hard to get into college if you can’t read) but the path was there.

If robots replace a lot of people, that path narrows. If AGI replaces all people, the path no longer exists.
Not a cartoon. He has manipulated the situation with the skill of a Romulan.

We're on the road to a Principate. (Trump being a viceroy, and Musk being the emperor.)

Perhaps counterintuitively Musk maybe should be made Speaker of the House. Give him an official role with specific power, responsibility and duties. Ambition to counter ambition. And not some nebulous creature who acts as shadow POTUS and shadow emperor.
I wonder if you can use atmospheric drag to pull you into the Sun / a different star / Kerbol.

Long ago, playing Elite if I remember correctly, you could fly close to a star and scoop up a load of hydrogen for later resale. I'd be interested to see a graph of gas density vs tendency to melt spacecraft compared to distance from the core for a typical star.
How Proxmox VE shreds your SSDs – with details
> Some very simple explanations, the models were probably overfitted to a degree on Python given its popularity in AI/ML work, and SWE-bench is all Python. Also, the underlying Github issues are quite old, so they probably contaminated the training data and the models have simply memorized the answers.

My understanding is that it works by checking if the proposed solution passes test-cases included in the original (human) PR. This seems to present some problems too, because there are surely ways to write code that passes the tests but would fail human review for one reason or another. It would be interesting to not only see the pass rate but also the rate at which the proposed solutions are preferred to the original ones (preferably evaluated by a human but even an LLM comparing the two solutions would be interesting).
Yeah, with this mentality, we wouldn't have electricity today. You will never make transition to new technology painless, no matter what you do. (See: https://pessimistsarchive.org)

What you are likely doing, though, is making many more future humans pay a cost in suffering. Every day we delay longevity escape velocity is another 150k people dead.
How long has SimpleBench been posted? Out of the first 6 questions at https://simple-bench.com/try-yourself, o1-pro got 5/6 right.

It was interesting to see how it failed on question 6:
https://chatgpt.com/c/6765e70e-44b0-800b-97bd-928919f04fbe

Apparently LLMs do not consider global thermonuclear war to be all that big a deal, for better or worse.
Youtube also blocks all but the crudest resolution on firefox.
Probably a function of the particlar psychographic you hang out with.

Meanwhile one observes the denial of any potential to even discuss ENM (along with straight-up cheating) contributing to an immeasurable portion of dyad breakups.

Or people staying in the dyad, but with tremendous unacknowledged suffering.
> It became a faster transportation system that uses air as a medium, but that’s it.

On the one hand, yes; on the other, this understates the impact that had.

My uncle moved from the UK to Australia because, I'm told*, he didn't like his mum and travel was so expensive that he assumed they'd never meet again. My first trip abroad… I'm not 100% sure how old I was, but it must have been between age 6 and 10, was my gran (his mum) paying for herself, for both my parents, and for me, to fly to Singapore, then on to various locations in Australia including my uncle, and back via Thailand, on her pension.

That was a gap of around one and a half generations.

* both of them are long-since dead now so I can't ask
if IQ is distributed on a bell curve, then you're mostly right, as most people aren't too different. almost 70% of people are in the middle range, i.e. between 85 and 115.

on the other hand, a difference of 85 and 115 might very well be what OP is talking about. i can't remember ever having a coworker who was so much more stupid than me that it would have been an issue, but i do know that i've had colleagues who were so much smarter than me that i suspect i might have been the stupid one in comparison - which would have been more noticable if our work had required higher intelligence (i only realized how much smarter he was than me when talking about private projects outside of work). so the difference in our mental capabilities wasn't necessarily a direct indicator of productivity and success with workloads where my lower capabilities were enough to get the job done, but that doesn't mean it wouldn't have been a stark contrast in a different setting.

i guess the people outside of the norm tend to specialize in work that either doesn't depend much on intelligence at all or selects for very high intelligence, so they're mostly among peers again.
The old city hall had a decorated cake look, but was a dysfunctional structure. There was nowhere to gather outside except the sidewalk. Entry was primarily through a large set of stairs that limited access. Once inside there was nowhere to gather, only a maze of narrow corridors servicing cramped offices with limited access to light and air.

The new city hall makes people angry and generates comments about totalitarianism, but it offers a range of places to gather inside and out and is extremely easy to navigate with internal spaces that have plenty of light and air. Brutalism may be an unpopular style, but the form itself has quite significant benefits.
There’s also the issue that in psych, everything is measured through indirect proxies and most of the predictions will be directional. That gives experimenters a LOT of wiggle room.

In physical science you can often directly measure a phenomenon and have a theory that makes very specific predictions
You are free to believe what you want, but the Black Forest is not in Bavaria. Some other observations are not wrong per se, but heavily spin-doctored. For example, the average wind speed in Bavaria is 6.9 m/s, which is about 2m/s slower than average wind speed in Schleswig-Holstein but very much in the economical range of wind energy facilities of 3 to 12 m/s, or gas imports from Russia to Europe have fallen by ~70% from end of 2021 to end of 2023 which is still too much, but not exactly sucking a teat, and so on.
The goalposts have moved, again and again.

It's gone from "well the output is incoherent" to "well it's just spitting out stuff it's already seen online" to "WELL...uhh IT CAN'T CREATE NEW/NOVEL KNOWLEDGE" in the space of 3-4 years.

It's incredible.

We already have AGI.
Maybe they are using the same OpenAPI wrapper to blast out resumes?

How did the LinkedIn signal degrade so substantially I wonder?

Bring back the in-person job fair!
China Takes a Shot at Nvidia. It Could Backfire on Beijing
Pragmatic Category Theory Part 1: Semigroup Intro
> uses a free track from Kevin MacLeod, also used in Kerbal Space Program. This means KSP gameplay videos get monetized.

Somebody made a bad rap song that samples the title screen music from Super Metroid, and goes around sending automated copyright claims to everyone who streams the game on Twitch. Every speedrunner and randomizer player has to deal with these bogus claims every couple of days.

A few months ago, the speedrun community held a 47-way race on the game's 30th anniversary: https://racetime.gg/sm/dynamic-plowerhouse-1749 It took a little while for everyone to ready up and start the race, so we all just sat on the title screen for ~10 minutes until everyone was good to go. The next day, dozens of copyright claims went out.

This has been going on for like 5 years; we dispute the copyright claims every single time, and people have contacted Twitch support many times. Yet, they won't do anything to stop the same person from filing thousands of false copyright claims for music he doesn't even own.
Generating and storing your passwords, OTPs, and passkeys in a fully E2EE system like 1Password is effectively a root of trust, although you also have to trust (a) the password manager company, (b) whatever third-party systems and devices they use to build and deliver their software, (c) the quality of their cryptosystem, and (d) whatever device you use to decrypt/access secrets in your vault.
What are "O3 progressions"? This thread is the first result when I search, and everything else on the page has something to do with military ranks.
It shows objectively that one model got better at this specific kind of weird puzzle that doesn't translate to anything because it is just a pointless pattern matching puzzle that can be trained for, just like anything else. In fact they specifically trained for it, they say so upfront.

It's like the modern equivalent of saying "oh when AI solves chess it'll be as smart as a person, so it's a good benchmark" and we all know how that nonsense went.
Try to become top level at Java and complex systems patterns
Completely trashing what's left of his reputation.