skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hiya, thanks for the feedback.

TOTP based MFA is included in the free, community plan.

As I mentioned elsewhere, for folks who are price conscious, self-hosting is the better option.

But I get it! The story I tell internally all the time is that when I was working at a startup, our entirely hosting bill was on the order of $200/month (on Heroku; it was a while ago). There's no way we would have paid $350 just for an identity solution. But we would probably have chosen to host FusionAuth community on heroku for much much less and operated it ourselves.

Anyway, thanks for your feedback.
And you would be wrong. You somehow jumped from "in practical terms" to "literally equivalent".
Where do you live and what languages do you use when you search?
The "CDP Mode" used for bypassing CAPTCHAs and bot-detection has it's own ReadMe within SeleniumBase: https://github.com/seleniumbase/SeleniumBase/blob/master/exa...
And there's a recent YouTube video with live demos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr90iQmNsKM
> C programmers these days have no idea what a far pointer even is

I inherited a C++ project from 1999 or so that still had far pointers for some reason - I had to do some research that day.
You’re loosely describing a CSRF vulnerability, which do occur but people try to design against them and mitigate them. For example, actions that mutate often require POST (which won’t be triggered by a link), cookies may be marked strict (and not sent from frames or following links), etc.
(this is a dumb tautology and you're dumb for repeating it)
I started selling my own design templates and tutorials a few years back and ended up making a steady $2–3k/month from a single Medium post that ranked well on Google and some Product Hunt traction.

This led me to build https://tapflow.co on the side (been 3 years). It's a simple platform where tech pros-designers, devs, marketers, PMs— turn internal docs, templates and workflows into paid products. I kept it lean since most don't have time to build a full course.

The core idea: many pros have valuable knowledge sitting unused-too busy, unsure of their expertise, or find it too complicated to create full courses. I built a tool to help them quickly pack and sell what they know, creating passive income.

Some friends and early adopters have made over $20k from their products (mainly courses). One French teacher even earned over $7k on the first day with just a promo page https://tapflow.co/p/du-b2-au-c1-4ebMhTxqJi

Since launch, I haven’t done any real marketing—just personal recommendations, Product Hunt and Reddit. Now it’s stable income. The platform takes a small cut and offers a pro tier.
They are not comparable in practical terms.
CrowdStrike moves to dismiss Delta Air Lines suit, citing contract terms
What if it was a separate Google tool so it didn’t interrupt search?
Yes, it is like starting with a 180 IQ and going down to 150. You still seem bright to external observers, but deep down inside, you know you are a n00b.
Nobody is itching to put GIMP into their product, but everyone can think of ways to build upon Llama and Flux and provide new value.
An amazing product that I’ve experienced firsthand. It’s satisfying when attendees share more pictures of the event both Pre and post event.
Everybody is a total mess (and you should be one too) [video]
Maybe my understanding of "big company" salaries are skewed but I imagine there's a profitable middle ground between big company salary and hypergrowth? As long as one isn't taking VC money at least

On the flip side, I can't say I'm super sure what "hypergrowth" means, it's a rate of growth but I guess what really Matters is some expected valuation/market cap kinda thing
And thats why Google searched used to be valuable.
The technical term is "parity simetry" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parity_(physics) that means that a system and the mirrored version behave exactly in the same way.

Chemistry is about electromagnetism, and electromagnetism has parity symmetry. Also gravity is somewhat important, but gravity also has parity symmetry. And even the strong force has parity symmetry. So for all practical purpuses, chemistry has parity symmetry and when you mirror a bunch of molecules, the mirrored versions will behave exacly as the normal ones.

But ... if you were looking carefuly I didn't mention the weak force, because it breaks the parity symmetry. It's very difficult to prove it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wu_experiment You have to get a bunch of radioactive cobalts, put them in a strong magnetic field, keep them super cold, and you will get 60% of the decays in one direction and 40% in the other, breaking the 50% and 50% expectation if it didn't break the parity symmetry.

Can this experiment be reproduced in a chemistry molecule?????

I need more questions marks ????????

I think no one has done it and it looks very difficult to try. Can I use my imagination and make will guess?

Let's say you get something like the hemo part of hemoglobin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heme It has four nice nitrogens that probably can bind to cobalt instead, or perhaps you need a variant. Now make some substitutions to break the symmetry so it it's like a recycle symbol that has a clear direction. Add some bridge under the plane, perhaps connect the small part that is bellow the graphic that I'm not sure why iis useful.

And make the mirrored version too.

Now, if the design was super smart, most of the cobalts in a version will have the north pole pointing to the bridge, and the mirrored version will have the south pole. I'm not sure it's possible, but I can handwave some explanation that say it's possible, but perhaps this idea makes no sense.

Now, did I mention you need radioactive cobalt? When it desintegrates it send an electron that will sometimes colide with the bridge and destroy it, or go in the other direction and keep the molecule without changes.

So after some time the you can see that the time to self destruction is different in the original and the mirrored version.

In conclussion, I think it's possible but no one has done it, no sane person would try it, and if someone get it working then they will get a Nobel price.

It will be very expensive, and completely unuseful, so I completely not expect to see something like this is a living cell.
No apparent relation to https://archive.org?
I am perplexed by Grammarly getting progressively worse as time goes by. I am seriously considering spending a weekend or two on writing myself a small LLM powered clone. I think a browser extension for Gmail should be relatively easy. I am not sure about Word (desktop) and Google Docs though.
The current Rivian cars have this, enabled, in the US.
There is already a closed ticket about JWT usage. Unfortunately the ticket author did not point at any specific weaknesses besides revocation to which the app author answered:

"JWTs aren't innately problematic - they come with the tradeoff of not being able to be revoked. The ideal setup is setting a short expiry time on the access_token (eg 5min) and setting a long expiry on the refresh token (which is not a JWT and can be revoked)."

The fact that this tradeoff is acceptable to some apps is correct. But I disagree that JWT tokens aren't innately problematic. Stateless tokens aren't innately problematic. Even stateless access tokens aren't innately problematic if you're willing to live with the tradeoffs (revocation delay or a centralized/propagated revocation list). But JWT is innately problematic, in the most literal sense possibly: the very nature of the JWT specification is to permit the largest amount of cryptographic flexibility including supporting (and even recommending) insecure cryptographic algorithms, that may cause security problems if chosen. In other words: it is innately (= in its very nature) problematic (= has the potential of causing problems). JWT is the poster child of being "innately problematic".

I think the app author confuses "innately problematic" with "impossible to implement securely". JWT is not impossible to implement securely. After all, even SAML with the nefarious XMLdsig is possible to implement securely and we do, in fact, have secure implementations of SAML. The real problem is that JWT is hard to implement securely if you do not have the right expertise. And OpenAUTH is giving us (yet another) clear example where the JWT implementation is less than ideal.

I will be the first to admit that I am not expert enough to know how to hack this kind of cryptography, but I am also not good enough to prove that it is safe to use.
> Is it theoretically possible with PC motherboards and GPUs that sit in card slots of some form?

As far as I'm aware, not with the speed that unified memory gets. The trace and path lengths alone put hard caps on what can be done in terms of signalling speed. But I'm not an expert, I'm recounting what I was told when I asked the same question! Perhaps the state of the art has improved in this space?
Trying to shoehorn code errors into HTTP errors is a prime example of conflating two very different things because sometimes they look similar. Let different things be different, I like to say. You either let your HTTP handlers do their own error-to-http-code management or you end up with a massive switch statement trying to map them all, or whatever monstrosity this approach is.

Also the entire problem of the OP would go away if they just implemented opentelemetry tracing to their logs.
Plot twist: poisoning local results is one of the easiest things to do. So yeah. Great until not good. And again, the problem is simple: a lack of safeguards.

If you let randoms abuse the system, someone always will at some point.
I imagine there are situations where, while internally owning the mistake is Important, it can be harmful to own it in front of "stakeholders"
Could you update the title to include (2017)? It’s still a great read today.
Thanks, structured output makes a lot more sense. The pydantic approach at the link looks straightforward.
A 12-week plan to learn Jazz guitar
A 12-week self-guided curriculum with suggested theory, exercises and song repertoire. Progress state is stored in the URL query string.
It’s similar to rental apartments. They think the challenge of changing jobs/apartment is bigger than the improvement of salary/rent. They’ll difference is the smaller salary increase or the rent increase is maximized to help their finances not yours.
It feels really nice to see stuff like this while the most of the people think Slack, Discord and a few others are the only choices.

I recently went through the hassle of deciding on something small for my family + company circle. Mainly considered XMPP and Matrix, and went with Matrix. Didn't know there was such a thing as "always-on" on IRC tho.
That's what I've always thought.

Legalese looks an awful lot like code (I'm a programmer) meant to cover all edge cases and not permitting subroutines. It would be an awful lot clearer if they used a single term and then defined it after the main body of the law. Put as much as possible into a global appendix--as a layman occasionally trying to look up a law I find eternal references to as defined by xxxx.

And require the state to publish a version with hyperlinks and hover text.
Yes. But it's not for everyone, especially not for a lot of engineers.

Many of these buyers feel more comfortable meeting you in-person, so going to trade shows, writing articles for niche trade publications, and sometimes doing site visits are all very helpful. So is cold calling.

Sales cycles are often slow. You have to get used to customers taking months to decide, having lots of meetings with different stakeholders, and to get good at telling the difference between those who need a lot of meetings but will likely close versus those who will never do anything. It's a very different game than selling subs online, which I know little about.

The product does need to be decent but I disagree with others that it has to be amazing. Most enterprise software is horrible. They will be delighted if you actually solve their problems (rather than the problems horizontally-oriented software vendors want their customers to have), even if it has some rough edges, as long as you're very customer-focused, responsive, and available.

But it also tends to be durable revenue, because you get tightly integrated into their operations if you do it right.
Good point, I've already asked people which country they were searching from and what languages they used to search online.

Please guys, add COUNTY/LANGUAGE(S) when you are giving positive/negative feedback.
Jesse Welles Eviscerates UnitedHealthcare in New Protest Song
Our philosophies differ.

> Progressive income tax is also silly. Just because you earn more money than someone else doesn't mean you derive more benefits from the government.

I think "pay what you can afford" is fair because the only way to make half a million dollars (or more) a year is to disproportionately reap the benefits of society. Marginal income tax is fair in the sense that everyone does pay the same. Your $11,001st dollar is taxed the same as everyone else, just like your $578,126th dollar. If you don't want to pay the highest rates then take advantage of deductions (aka incentives aka loopholes) and invest in creating jobs.

> Everyone feels burned and like the "others" aren't paying what they should be.

I definitely don't feel this way and I am happy to pay my marginal rates. I just don't think they go far enough.

> Federal taxes should be a flat percentage, no deductions, no credits, no so-called "loop holes"... nothing. Every citizen pays the same percentage (whatever it needs to be).

Do you propose a flat income tax or a flat wealth tax? Should capital gains be taxed as income?

> For a nation that got it's start in no small part due to being over-taxed, it's very interesting to see just how much tax shenanigans we tolerate today.

My understanding was that the issue was lack of representation or ability to levy local taxes but I admit my knowledge of that point in history is weak. The America of today is certainly different from revolutionary times. I would say it is better.
Imagine if LinkedIn could give you relevant material and news related to your industry.

Instead I’m getting the top 10 tricks to make 70k Indian currency next to a 15 year old Reddit video.
yeah, this part itself. How easy it is to get them to do it?
You can find citations in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_20...
That's not going to happen when there is vested interest in propping up fossil fuels. I hope I'm wrong and you're right, I just don't think that's how the incoming administration sees things.
yeah, still don't get what is all the fuzz is about. defining symbols systematically (e.g. with some hierarchy) and having constants mapping symbols to values - all is a no-brainer
Have you had any issue with messages/notifications not be sent/received with Matrix? I wanted to try Matrix for friends and family, but either I would never get the message until I opened the app, or I'd get the notification but my phone wouldn't vibrate. Eventually settled on XMPP with Conversations on Android.
i am asking about download the client and even registering and entering a password
XOR Texture is the cover photo for my LED matrix project. I love the simple beauty of this texture https://github.com/jsheedy/matrix-display
Great explanation, thank you. Thinking about them in terms of PKI and SSH keys finally clicked for me.
It's fair to say that with OAuth the resource owner can choose to display a consent screen or not. For example, when consent is granted already, it can be skipped if the resource owner does not need it. Likewise, Google Workspace and other enterprise services that use OAuth can configure in advance which apps are trusted and thus skip permission grants.

Not to say the concern about redirects isn't legitimate, but there are other ways of handling this. Even redirects aren't necessary if OAuth is implemented in a browser-less or embedded browser fashion, e.g. SFAuthenticationSession for one non-standard example. I haven't looked this up in awhile but I believe the OAuth protocol was being extended more and more to other contexts beyond the browser - e.g. code flow or new app-based flows and even QR auth flows for TV or sharing prompts.

(Note I am not commenting on OpenAUTH, just OAuth in general. It's complex, yes, but not as bad as it might seem at first glance. It's just not implemented in a standard way across every provider. Something like PassKeys might one day replace it.)
This is restricting the sale of "how to murder people" handbooks, even at garage sales. Therefore every garage sale proprietor is burdened to make sure they aren't selling a handbook explaining how to murder people, even if they got a load of miscellaneous items from an anonymous person.
I think it's more complex than that. At least to me food in particular is nothing special, I truly eat just for substance, so if it doesn't taste bad, I'm happy.

I still believe that there's place for creative work, I just don't see why something created by something other than a human is inherently bad.
> And if you can do that, then you might as well print it on the price tag (along with pre-tax price if you want).

Fun fact: sales tax rates are not stable. Our state publishes quarterly tax changes at the county level; city-level changes are presumably too numerous for the state to publish in the same format.

Inclusive pricing can obviously be done in-store, but it also more or less ensures that some of the items in your store will have incorrect prices some of the time.
I would like to see general law subject to a restriction like that. But law that applies to specialized domains can be written such that anyone reasonably proficient in that domain can understand it.
Yes, the models tailored for search are constantly improving —which is why I encourage everyone to take screenshots when something funny pops up!

I sincerely admire your positive mindset!
Positive that you can scroll past AI results?

For me, that's like saying your mirror reflects a distorted image, but the good thing is you can decide not to look at it...
That’s not true. There’s been laws in many jurisdictions, including the US, applying to online forums, since before the internet even existed.

The famed section 230, passed in 1996, is an update to a section of the 1934 Communications Act, which is but one set of laws regulating many aspects of forums. Lawsuits in the early 90s led Congress to modify, but not abolish, the stack of laws regarding all communications technology.

Now that you know but 2 of the many laws affecting online forums, you can dig up plenty more yourself.
nitpick: "holistically"
almost exclusively english unless I'm searching specifically for very country specific results.

yandex rankings aiui are based on what results have had the most clicks, so results are very generally the most to least popular globally.
Yes, but that needs to be cleaned up!
It's a de facto ban on small forums.
If your name's on it it's a trademark violation. If they merely said "our product is similar to tinySA" then nothing you can do - you don't get a special exemption from the laws of market competition, and it seems that customers like their product more.
The last line of OP:
"The built-in websocket support is another key feature for me since it lets me to provide a web client just by serving some static files (I use Gamja for this)."

https://github.com/Libera-Chat/gamja
There's not really a clear call out to what a visitor should do. It's like, if you know you know.

Ok, so did you archive the one maybe app from 10 years ago I'm interested in? What should I do?

What if I'm about to archive my service and I want you to back it up? Again, what do I do?
I never said that there was an ideal time. But even 20 years ago, there was way less hyper-optimization than now. And 20 years before that there was less still.

The famous (although not confirmed) story of American Airlines removing one olive from passengers' salads to save $40,000 per year is from 1987. At that time something like that was revolutionary.
Finally, someone doxxing themselves! :D

Seriously, thank you for sharing your location.

Different states/countries/languages = different user experiences.
Did the Vermont plating loophole get closed?
Top lawyers question law that stops Operation Ironside High Court challenge
This concerns AU retro fitting new laws (2024) to allow warrentless 2018 taps of ANOM 'encrypted' comms in joint five eyes (AU-US-UK-..) entrapment / sting operations.

Mr Caldicott said he was shocked at how blatant and frank the communications over the devices were, and that it indicated those using them had no idea they were not secure.

"The more I got into it, the more it became apparent that the operation had originated in the United States with the FBI," he said.

"They had encouraged an individual to develop the software and then promoted the production of these phones, which they rented out to a group of criminals for their various operations.

"What really surprised me was that the FBI believed they couldn't use the intercepted messages as evidence in their own cases, because it could be considered entrapment."
My interpretation (from a quick skim) is that it's not Literally based on the shape of magnetic fields, but rather they're applying the abstract "model" of how fields work to try and model how attention works
From what I can tell, Grammarly bought coda for 150M and a ceo position forced by the VC’s.. it was their only option. Yes I agree they are under the same VC’s. Grammarly has a leadership problem, and coda has a money problem. shishir has a huge influence in Silicon Valley due to his YouTube days. So yes, two companies struggling to survive. One has reputable leader living off his past success (not current) and one company with money but no leadership. It’s a lifeline for both and last chance to show they can be successful. I guarantee shishir has two years to prove he can be a leader or he is out of the game. It was way to save egos and hopefully make a good company.
"Guaranteed to happen" vs "doesn't happen at all" is a false dichotomy.

If you think a company is doing a bad job of serving its customers, compete with it.

If you're right, and you can do a better job of serving those customers, you are likely to become rich.

If you aren't interested in competing, maybe you don't actually believe it is possible to do much better.

I agree that in principle, there can be a role for the government in removing structural barriers to competition. I haven't seen that role particularly well-articulated in this thread, though.
You guys are so crazy.

I've got the popcorn ready for the next completely unrelated topic. Let's talk about the love life of sardines, shall we?
Jk on a second glance they're taking it a bit more literally than I initially thought