skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
" If the plane had come down in any other part of the bay, such as the 30-foot deep waters to its east or the dry flats to the west, Flight 2 would have either sunk, or likely set ablaze"

Wait wait wait, plane fuselages don't naturally float? I always assumed they did?
A zipcode should be plenty and grocery websites do that already.
I remember shopping in Japan.

The price on the tag, is exactly what you pay (same with services, like hotels).

Since this is Japan, it's a high price, but no surprises.

Also, the service is amazing, and they won't accept tips. If you leave money on the table, they will chase after you, to give it back.
Your build/buy analysis is pretty astute if you accept the axioms: when reasonable people disagree firmly it’s almost always their starting assumptions.

I’ll challenge the notion that enriching mediocre people at the expense of society is either reasonable or useful. Enlightenment ideals around the sanctity of personal property fall apart when you extrapolate that to millions of people in passive index funds who don’t vote on governance.

Neither the United States Constitution nor the Universal Declaration of Human Rights nor the Geneva Conventions have any protections for rent seeking assholes as a bloc.

Don’t shoot the messenger: in my reading of history either one group backs down or the other slaughters them.

I’m lobbying for the peaceful resolution.
Minnesota banned these this year! It goes into effect Jan 1st. https://minnesotareformer.com/2024/05/20/governor-signs-junk...
> GP stated explicitly they have a theory about something that is causing people to behave differently.

Yes and I disagree that connectivity is inherently negative or even overwhelming.

> You can call that an opinion if you'd like.

This “theory” is totally unsubstantiated so is no more than an opinion.

> You can not believe the theory and instead blame that person's "choice," which is also "your opinion man."

Yes. That’s exactly what I did.

> Your anecdote isn't very relevant to the theory in a thread full of people talking to the contrary.

I don’t find the volume of an argument compelling.
probably my biggest pure JS app is this one: https://github.com/bwasti/mebm

you can try it here https://bwasti.github.io/mebm/
And that comparison is important - when junk fees are allowed more honest companies suffer because consumers might shop around and end up choosing the option that is actually more expensive. Those consumers might be on page 12/13 of a form and just accept the fee to avoid the hassle - or they may assume everyone (including what looked like a more expensive competitor) is baking the fees in late in the process and not bother investigating deeper.

Hidden fees create market inequities.
Reminds me of a case in healthcare, where a hospital found genuine apologies were way more effective than stonewalling to try and avoid liability.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/saying-sorry-pays...

> When a treatment goes wrong at a U.S. hospital, fear of a lawsuit usually means “never daring to say you’re sorry.”

> That’s not the way it works at the University of Michigan Health System, where lawyers and doctors say admitting mistakes up front and offering compensation before being sued have brought about remarkable savings in money, time and feelings.
The Jewish people includes the diaspora, the Jewish state is Israel, and the Jewish nation is something that might have existed before Israel was recognized. A people (singular) is neither a nation nor a state. It's closest to a race or ethnicity. The Kurdish nation might exist, but it doesn't include the diaspora, while the Kurdish people would.
Have you considered using an LLM model API? You could just send it the posting text and come with a good prompt to extract the most likely required skills.
Surely this is outdated advice in the world of "Protect your privacy with NordVPN" all over youtube.
> Why do we teach kids how to do basic arithmetic by hand?

I think kids waste way too much time doing hard arithmetic by hand. As a particularly egregious example, I visited a Montessori primary school where they demonstrated what is essentially a complex single player board game, for calculating square roots by hand. It's a process whereby a 5th grader would take ~10 minutes to calculate the root of a 3 digit number, by moving dozens of pins around. It looked so silly, and while other Montessori equipment offers geometrical intuition, this one seemed to offer none. Squaring with trial and error would have been so much easier.

Other more typical examples are of kids spending hundreds of hours practicing long multiplication and long division of e.g. 4 digits, and then getting punished and stressed out about having made silly mistakes. While in the real world, no one in their right mind would choose to perform these calculations by hand any more, and would instead use a tool incapable of making arithmetic mistakes.

I don't have a clear solution, but would tend towards an educational system that teaches only the very basics of performing each mathematical operation (probably up to the level the average literate adult would do mentally), and then focus the rest of the time on problems where the students are the ones posing the question, using a calculator/computer to solve it, and then check whether the answer makes sense in the original context.

EDIT: For those curious about it, I just found a blog post demonstrating the logic behind this square root peg board. The author of the blog argues that it does help build understanding, but from what I saw, I would politely disagree.

https://borisreitman.medium.com/square-roots-the-montessori-...
I've found tsc --noEmit with esbuild is the magic combination.

This way you can split the type checking from the actual bundling, as esbuild only does the latter.
Or move to a flatter area ?
Cash App creator Bob Lee's killer found guilty of second-degree murder
It feels like this is the barrier to that 3D economy. The width of an iphone is approximately the interpupil distance of an average adult, moving one camera to the other side would make stereoscopic image/video capture a widespread capability. It just lacks an application.
They do for a bit...
Nope. I hate when website use IP for anything, especially language selection. I travel all the time as well as use VPNs for work, and the idea that my IP represents anything other than what network I’m connecting from is just lazy UX.
Thank you for sharing, you're words are inspirational. I need pushes like that to get me to try AA.

I struggle with marijuana addiction (well, disassociate addiction and MJ is my goto) and I have a huge amount of respect for folks that made it through addictions to hard drugs (I very much consider alcohol a hard drug). You make my plight seem manageable.

Tangentially - 'Infinite Jest' is an amazing portrail of addiction and mental health issues.
I could imagine saying "God, are you seeing this?" to playfully emphasize something sinful they're seeing. Or similarly "Hey FBI, did you know about this?" to playfully point out that something is (or seems) illegal. Or someone says "Mike Tyson isn't that great a fighter" and someone else pretends to look at someone behind them and go "Hey Mike, what do you think about that?". It's all kinda just pretending some other entity is watching these events for humor, and I think it's all just 2nd person.

Or you could say something like "Chat likes it when I rap", but that's similar to "God likes it when I genuflect after making a touchdown" or something -- it's just standard 3rd person with a flair.

People have a tendency to over-emphasize how unique new speech patterns are. This same thing happened with "literally" being English's first "auto-antonym" -- it wasn't really, it was just a slightly different form of sarcasm. "OMG I literally died! Like I'm genuinely dead now. None of you are hearing this because I'm totes a corpse. I'm completely serious you guys, I literally have no pulse anymore." -- I can imagine all of that being in the same vein, but it's hard to argue that that means "genuinely" and "totes" and "completely" are all auto-antonyms too. Or that "riiiiiight" is an auto-antonym because it actually means "wrong". Things just aren't that new in language.
Are those prices in USD, or a local currency? (Apologies for not knowing which local currency to ask about; it seems that Zimbabwe changed currency recently and no longer uses the Zimbabwean Dollar?)
We need validation of GPT detection tool accuracy (false/true & negative/positive), and in what circumstances, or they are useless. Without independent information about whether something is GPT-written [1], there is no way to verify it, so they can't be verified on submitted student papers where the info is from people (students) with very strong incentives to lie (not wanting to be caught).

Here are a couple references in the article, but I would like to see a review of this question:

> Researchers at the University of Reading recently conducted a blind test in which ChatGPT-written answers were submitted through the university’s own examination system: 94% of the AI submissions went undetected and received higher scores than those submitted by the humans.

> One study at Stanford found that a number of AI detectors have a bias towards non-English speakers, flagging their work 61% of the time, as opposed to 5% of native English speakers (Turnitin was not part of this particular study).

[1] That needs to be defined: Every word? mostly? GPT-written then edited? What about ideas from the humans and writing by GPT? First draft by human and editing by GPT - what about using it as a grammar checker? For suggestions on clarifying some tricky passages? ?
Some ticket sites won't even show you the fees until you create an account.
Moving fast by releasing unreviewed code into critical production paths can lead to breaking things, as this story illustrated.

It’s the same cavalier attitude taken by startups that treat user data and privacy as something to worry about later, someday.
I really like CUDA, but these are crazy expensive for the specs. It's sad there is no competition.
As a free market fan, Khan seems to have been pretty terrible.

But this looks genuinely good! It's basically banning fraud.

---[EDIT], since everyone is asking for reasons here are two libertarian/conservative critiques:

• https://reason.com/2024/11/07/good-riddance-lina-khan/

• https://archive.ph/IjNmZ
Casually newer GM vehicles are one of the worst offenders together with Tesla with their poorly-shaped light beaming, that’s maybe a cosenquence of having a front end in the vehicle so high that the the headlights are level with the roof of “normal” sedans.
Unless... You have an AI listening and evaluating their oral exam.

I know it sounds like a farce. Because it is. But it might also be a proper solution.
This is, ironically, why I ended up with 1password over bitwarden: Their recovery process is down to "You can recover with paper, or another member of your family with access can break you into jail to get your account back up."

I have tested this process with my partner. the only thing that I cannot replace is the TOTP token to add new devices (however this is bypassed when recovering from paper). I have legitimately considered etching the recovery data into a small glass (borosilicate) dish using selective laser etching.
You don't think AI's can't be trained to lie? Odd, given a major research area right now is to prevent AI from lying. They do it so confidently now nobody can tell.
I mean, depends how hard you hit, and people need to get out... Water is not soft at ~150 knots; even Flight 1549 in the Hudson's perfect ditching resulted in the plane sinking when they opened the doors.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_Air_Flight_1549_r...

In this case, the ditching wasn't really intentional (the Hudson flight knew they were going down; this one just... flew into the sea due to fog), so it could have looked more like this if they were less lucky:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ditching_of_Ethiopian_Air...

Per Wiki:

> Asoh later stated that he realized the plane was too low once he spotted the water after the plane broke through the fog with an air speed of 177 mi/h (285 km/h). He grabbed the control stick to gain altitude and advanced the throttles in anticipation of having to abort the landing and perform a go-around, but the plane's main landing gear had already struck the water...

The Hudson flight was very challenging flying, but they did have four minutes of "we're going down", and enough time before "we're going down in the water" to do things like raise the gear.
"...Captain Asoh somehow managed to guide the plane onto the water and into the mud below without a single injury to the 100 adults and seven children on board, beyond a bloody nose."

A+ landing: zero fatalities and your airplane can take-off again on the same day.

B landing: zero fatalities.
I get the impression you haven't thought about this very hard.
Or just regular written exams.
Is dlt part of bruin-stack?
You're defending hidden fees?

Free markets depend on information. Facts. Not lies.
Not in my experience, claude seems great at writing idiomatic and performant react. You can even highlight code and ask it to spot performance issues and it will tell you where you can improve rendering efficiency etc.
Official release: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/12/...

(https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42441347)
Also known as SparkLink, Nearlink and Greentooth.
The same word in (one of?) its Chinese names can be translated into "spark", "flash" and "blitz" so there could be even more English translations out there.

There is a Wikipedia article on "Nearlink" [0] which supposedly is Huawei's brand name for it.

There seems to exist an official site for "SparkLink" [1] but non-Chinese language content on that site is sparse, and what downloads are available require registration.

0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NearLink

1: https://www.sparklink.org.cn/
I'm having a really hard time making sense of the whole enterprise of Qualia Computing/Qualia Research Institute. Like this particular subject (the nature of conciousness!) is rife with cranks, so they're starting at a disadvantage. They cite some real research published in Nature Communications, that seems at least somewhat related to their ideas, so that's promising. But then they're really (really!) focused on DMT and other hallucinogenic drugs. That's not crank-ish in and of itself, there's plenty of real research to be done on altered mental states. But, they seem a bit too excited about the altered states themselves. My general impression of the research focus and the way they write is a bit too close to like the overly excited tripping guy in your dorm room. Then the simulation is of a standing wave on a square plate, which is plainly so far from what's happening in the brain that it's a bit baffling why this would be considered relevant. Also the QRI page is really well designed and organized, which is generally not a feature of people who aren't thinking straight.

I'll concede that maybe I'm being too harsh and there's something real but unconventional here. That said, the whole presentation is like the perfect uncanny valley for real scientific inquiry. Very unsettling.
Show HN: I built a ringbuffer in go to start learning about lock free algorithms
Come January 21st, expect junk fees to explode. But don’t worry, as long as you make at least $10,000,000 per year, you’ll get a huge tax cut.
The judgement against Jones is $1.5B
Rough, but perfectly doable. It's how pretty much all my finals were done way back when. Classes of 200 and more.
> Also, the service is amazing, and they won't accept tips. If you leave money on the table, they will chase after you, to give it back.

I visited Japan some years back and loved this aspect of the culture as well. An Australian ski guide (this was a winter visit) explained it like so: "the Japanese attitude is to want to do a good job by default. Tipping implies that a good job is only done because of pay. The Japanese see quality service as intrinsically valuable in itself."
But this was always the case. When I was studying chemical engineering, it was an open secret that all the students were cheating. There was a giant google drive with all the solutions manuals, old tests, old programs, lab reports, whatever you wanted.

That's why pencil and paper tests were worth 80% of the grade.
My statement was overly general and that's a fair criticism - however I do remember e-commerce in the early days of the web. That early web experience for me was that generally users were required to make an account (mostly to verify age and ability to pay) before they could interact with items or create a shopping cart. In that era the interaction of sales taxes and the internet were much more complicated and shipping times and costs much more variable. I know that when my father was buying train books he'd often need to go to conventions in other states to pick up items in person because sellers were afraid of getting scammed out of their shipping fees.
Bit Banging LCD and Touch and USB on the Ch32v003 [video]
One republican commissioner voted with the rule, and Ferguson dissented based on lame duck rule making, not the merits, while agreeing that the FTC rule making was valid for businesses like tickets and short term lodging.
I’m not defending or denying what France did but in quite a few ways it was a civil war. It’s not like FLN was universally popular, before the French started committing mass atrocities it had quite limited support.

> to liberate

It’s not like they turned it into a democracy or even tried to. It was bit like Castro liberating Cuba just a probably with more atrocities targeting civilians or former Algerian soldiers serving in the French army.
The army was bigger, and had some better equipment. But there wasn't enough of it, neither for France, nor to support various French aligned troops (e.g. Spanish republicans).

And yes, it was very badly used. In part because of bad tactics and the wrong lessons learned from WWI and the Spanish Civil War, in part because there wasn't enough of it so they decided to spread it out across the front.
I took your word for it. Wow, that's an amazing sequence!
You mean to tell me you don't believe in acquired taste?

A person who spent years studying art was necessarily introduced to much more of it than someone who didn't.
Yes. To start with my mum lives on her own since my dad died not long before this, has macular degeneration so is going blind, and seeing her brother required a trip of 8 hours or do each way. Not a trivial undertaking.

She also wasn’t seriously thinking about not going, just needed a bit of extra encouragement.
And miss a chance to blame the government for something? Perish the thought...
Prompts need to be integrated into grading/eval of where students are mentally. Like - cite/attach your prompts to the paper, code, whatever.
Those two functions are indeed missing. However, you can create syntax objects with `syntax-quote`. Again, lots of missing functionality. They shouldn't be hard to implement tho, I just need to add template ids to the transformer.

If you're wondering how the hygiene works, each Identifier besides its name includes a set of "marks" (random unsigned integers). Identifiers are only equal if each name and their marks are equal. There's quite a bit more to this, but I feel you may be aware of how this works.

I do know. I haven't done that yet for no real practical reason besides some vestigial code that I have yet to remove. They are basically implemented the same already, under the hood they are both just transformers, I just haven't removed the AST code for syntax rules.
depends on what you mean by that, but we do use dlt through ingestr (https://github.com/bruin-data/ingestr), which is used inside Bruin CLI.
I believe that servers are also paid quite well.
I’ve been considering an LLM API, and it definitely sounds promising. My main concern is the cost—I'm processing around 300 job offers per day and plan to scale up further. Do you have any go-to APIs you’d recommend that balance performance and pricing?
It is at most a medium if.
Personally that's all I'm asking for. Transparent pricing. It amazes me how far business will go to to just hide how much they want to charge me.

Recently in California, restaurant have been great at making their prices as difficult as possible to try to figure out.
Healthcare surcharge: 6%

tip: 20%

tax: 8.625%

= total: 34.625%
Great! My wife was reading me ticket prices for an event on Ticketmaster yesterday, I kept telling her she needs to add them to the cart and start checkout to know the real price. She did just that and to my surprise the price didn't change at all!
Password manager support.

If my password manager running on my desktop can provision and access the passkey for use on another device like my phone, then so can malicious code running on my desktop, and exfiltrate it to hackers. The original design, where the private key only exists on a TPM and the private key never leaves the TPM doesn't have that flaw.
It’s solid, efficient, bug free code. What else matters?
Now I'm wondering about a gameplay twist "Arrakis Chess": Too much movement in a section of the board makes a 2x2 sandworm eat the pieces.
You also know that you probably shouldn't eat that extra cookie and yet...
Every voter was as informed of their candidate's positions as they wanted to be. The winner was very clear about their stance on regulation, and on how they would treat lobbying.
In what way did they "mix up how arp works"? They say

> That’s where our solution comes in — a solution designed specifically for internal networks, one that doesn’t just defend but creates chaos for attackers.
It would be nice if non-cars, like SUVs and pickups, paid more for insurance (but they pay less, because being tanks they protect their occupants even as they lay waste to everything else - unfortunately insurers care more about the former than the latter).
> The technically savvy do.

That's my point.

Yubikey doesn't pass the grandma test. Your everyday user isn't going to be carrying one around anytime soon.
Unrelated to the cheating part, if you don't see American colleges primarily as a path to economic stability, I think you are probably either rich that it doesn't matter or haven't seen the bottom 25% outcomes of college graduates who didn't treat it as a financial opportunity/investment and are struggling.
That's mentioned towards the end. The problem is it requires much more time and labor to give oral exams.