skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Cutis is an extension. That's the best you can get by being outside the core db.
If you want true distributed architecture then you need to change the QO, DDL, transaction, even query stat components. At which point it ends up being a fork.

Yes, the merges are hard. But pg12 changed lots of fundamental things making it very challenging. Pg15 to pg17 should be much simpler.
Did someone post this because this month we will see the rebalancing of the QQQ Nasdaq-100?

Word on the street is that $MSTR and $PLTR will be added. I don't know which companies will be chopped?
You mean like the health insurers that deliberately denied coverage for AIDS patients and cancer patients, knowing that would hasten/cause their deaths?

Those types of people?
Probably because AI is a misnomer. Machine learning is a better name, but even than it is pretty lacking.

What is generally called AI in common speech is pretty much a class of non-linear statistical models which require some training to generate weights which are than used to fit the model. Most people that know anything about statistics knows this, so it is fine actually. Misnomers exists in all industries and all science, and we just deal with them.
We don't need to know this exact number to know that American patients are getting uniquely fucked by their healthcare system compared to every other developed nation. Once we're on-par with what other countries achieve, then we can have the philosophical debate.
Yep. Guess how many people went to prison for that one.
> They have sold $60+ BILLION of shares to investors and not yet bought the underlying securities.

> So when exactly will that $60 billion of buy pressure hit the market?

Citadel needs to deliver the stock they sold on T+1 as of May 28, 2024. There's some allowance for failure to deliver, but the data is out there, if Citadel is routinely failing to deliver, you should be complaining about that, not about their financial statements.

Meanwhile, if Citadel wants to pay me fractional pennies more per share than a public exchange, and also my brokerage fractional pennies for the privilege, who am I to say no? Especially when the public exchange may charge me a fee to trade.
Neither of those are single-payer systems, which you can see by the fact that both of your quotations involve multiple payers. Google "does france have single payer healthcare" or "does germany have single payer healthcare" for more info
Here it is:

https://hackernews-new-jobs.arm1.nemanjamitic.com/search?com...
Profits after paying executive
salaries, right?

In any case there should not be a profit motive in (health) insurance.
'Shouldn't' is true. But the prosecution does not need to explain why they reject a potential juror by 'preemptive challenge'. Why would they take the chance?

Similarly, a defendant's race is not relevant to their guilt, but you're not going to pick a self-declared racist if you don't have to.
Yes, PFOF is woefully misunderstood but its very much not win win win.

The reason its bad is because its anti-competive and gives them information that no-one else has access to.

By trading against you, Citadel prevents any other potential market maker from trading with you. With less competition, the spread widens and even after price improvement, you're paying more.

PFOF also tells them who they are trading against but anyone else who just sees a quote doesn't know that.

Generally, things are very zero sum so wins all around are very unlikely. But some thinking is needed to track where the value loss and gains are.
more like class action or regulatory step in. in theory market transactions are based on mutual consent. if consent isn't respected, then that's a problem.
I just want to know if the stock movement is justified or not.
>Not trying to be obtuse about this because I get it... but if we end up in this situation, I think olives and pineapples will be one of our least concerns.

Lower priority sure. But, people who only pay attention to the highest priorities are likely to be miserable even if they make it.

>So while I don't disagree with your sentiment at all I would just say that I hope you have things like grains and staples on that list.

I have things like Megasphaera hexanoica and Clostridium acetobutylicum on the list. Grains are there, but the truth of the matter is until I can secure acreage that stuff's put on hold. Am trying to find one of the old pull-type combines, some other equipment (I have storage if I can buy them now).

>but I highly recommend just finding a few names and emailing them about your project.

They're not interested in talking to me. Their minimum order's a little high for a cultivar of pistachio I need for rootstock, doesn't seem to be any other option. One or two nurseries will sell a single sapling for $70 or so, but multiplying that into the 20 or 30 trees I want to start with will take a long time. They sell seed for $1 each, but their minimum order's a bit absurd. Told me "that's just two pieces of budwood to get you to the minimum"... what am I going to do with budwood when I'm buying rootstock seed right this moment? My current plan is to just get terebinthus and vera seed, grow both, and hybridize them myself. Only a 10 yr setback, shouldn't be a problem.
Isn't it the same thing as the human race? It depends who you're asking.
nostrademons says >"Maybe, or the country collapses before he goes to trial."<

which seems pretty far-fetched to me.

But poster ablation earlier spoke of the:

"toxic stew of stupidity and sub-4chan conspiracy theorising." on ZeroHedge."

Is HN immune to what happened to Zerohedge? Some of the posts here are pretty speculative, to put it mildly.
GP was from me :)

You stated: "Most React apps need a backend too."

But in reality this is irrelevant to the conversation, because the top post was asking if comparing HTMX to React is like apples to oranges, which it is, because both tools accomplish different things with completely different feature-sets.

A good example of this is the implementation of TodoMVC. [1] React's implementation can live completely in the browser, and even be stateful. [2] An implementation with HTMX requires a server to handle templating/rendering. [3]

[1] https://todomvc.com/

[2] https://github.com/tastejs/todomvc/tree/master/examples/reac...

[3] https://github.com/rajasegar/todomvc-htmx
No, it won't. It's possible to 3d print suppressors that withstand multiple shots, even mag dumps if they're made robustly enough.

He needed a Neilsen device or piston in the suppressor to assist with cycling on the action, which he didn't have.

He's not surprised that he has to rack the slide after every shot, he knows that it most likely will not cycle and he'll have to work it manually and he reaches immediately to do it.

edit: i'll speculate and say the suppressor still worked after the shooting because he still had it on him. if it was melted or broken, he may have been more apt to toss it.
At least you go into this seeing the reputation that Redis Labs has worked hard on earning recently.

Could you not have stayed separate from them while contributing again?
One pain point I can see is during taxation. The 1099 will be long if your robo trader frequently trades.
Ok, thanks. I'll avoid the Turning Tarpits.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_tarpit
Off topic. I saw this thread the other day and thought it will be an interesting topic. But then it dropped off and disappeared. I doubled checked the topic was 2 days ago but now it reappeared as 2 hours ago. Anyone knows why?
I wonder what would happen if you just ran this on a continuous loop and only intermittently fed in new tokens or queried it for token outputs.
Imagine someone has taken something of yours- would it be just to take it back, even if it could not be proven in court? I'd argue yes, though the trick is convincing everyone else that it was just.

Imagine someone murders your brother. They are friends with the judge so they are let to walk. Have you been denied justice?

Again, the reason not to shoot people on the street is not because it is always unjust but because its not always clear what is just and we would like a fair consistent way to decide that, in a way that's legible to other people.

If you think the death penalty is fair, then you admit that you are fine with people being killed in the name of justice. The only question is, is the person the one who did the crime. Normally a judge would decide that but I don't see why that's a prerequisite
A few words per...?
To answer that question, first I would need to understand how a normal person would behave in the same circumstance.

The sum of requests for insurance money is far greater than the total amount an insurance company brings in. Denials will need to happen, and I do not have the ability to judge whether a denial was appropriate or inappropriate in a vacuum.
The phrase 'mental illness' has expanded as a category a thousand-fold this millennium. I see no evidence he has any mental illness, other than a particular kind that is fully voluntarily and reversible.
Optimizing Linux MD Bitmap Code Yields 89% Throughput Boost for Quad SSDs
Does anyone rebates 100% of the borrow fee or did that initially?
Well Himalayas are definitely better than Alps! :)
If you find ChatGPT useful, pay just one month of Claude AI and use both. I bet you'll discover that Claude AI can help you a great deal more. If that will be the case, you gained a much better AI assistant. Otherwise it's just 20 bucks... For me the difference is huge.
Naturally they would not wake you up mid-procedure for payment, nor ask you for payment later. What anthem wanted to do was put a cap on the number of billable hours per procedure, and have anesthesiologists accept payment based on that cap as "payment in full", meaning they would not expect additional payment for the extra time they spent after a procedure went long, either from the patient or the insurerer. This would have resulted in anesthesiologists making less money (as well as having less opportunity for fraud), which is why they didn't like it.

But it was presented in popular media as if the insurance company was trying to shift the cost of overlong procedures onto the patient, rather than onto the anesthesiologists. Thankfully there was a public outcry and the anesthesiologists won, well-deservedly so considering they must be barely scraping by on a median income of $470,000/year.
I was at Mozilla when this was implemented.

It was completely optional for websites to support this. A few did at first.

A lot of people internally wanted it to be on-by-default, but the argument was that if it was, nobody would respect it – after all, what tracking platform would willingly only track the 0.1% of people who went into the settings to enable it? (Internet Explorer did eventually enable it by default, which got them good press but ultimately killed the feature since everyone stopped respecting it.)

Overall, I'm happy to see this sunsetted. I don't think it actually did anything – in fact, I think it implies that it did way more than it did, so it was just a faux feeling of security.

(All that being said, I would love if the cookie modals on each site became browser-level, but I'm sure there's many reasons that hasn't happened yet. And I suspect a bit reason starts with a G and ends with an Oogle.)
There's plenty of countries that are higher: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_in...

Most of those countries aren't exactly paragons of political stability, but they're probably not going to undergo a french revolution any time soon.
There are good reasons to oppose his murder, but they are not found within him.
SF tech CEO's billboards are 'dystopian.' That's how he wants it
Ntsync Linux Patches Revived to Help Boost Steam Play Gaming Performance
I've added that to the text above. Thanks!
Only if you kill the humans or let them educated.

Otherwise AI comes on top
Tokyo Is Giving Employees 4-Day Workweek to Try to Boost Low Fertility
Psychiatric adverse events following Covid-19 vaccination
Handy calculator. Comparing to VTSAX (.04% expense ratio), they show a 1% difference. Not nothing, but hard to justify switching when you consider the downside risk of this company going out of business or selling in the next 30 years.

I think this is going to be a hard product to sell when your target market is exactly the sort of people who are well-informed enough to just buy vanguard mutual funds for a nearly identical result.

Not to sound like a total hater but I'm always so surprised that VCs are willing to invest in these companies that just seem obviously flawed based on common sense. Similar to that web browser startup Mighty.
Yes, it absolutely works. I meant that this is currently not intuitively discoverable :)
Mathematical Adventures Await Us
Absolutely, if your company doesn't want to make sales or if you want to be bothered all the time by people calling and mailing only for them to find out your product isn't a fit for them. Or if you want third party sellers to take over most of your business like Booking.com, AirBnB DoorDash or Amazon.

Companies who understand the importance of a customer friendly and functional web presence get a great return on their investment. And it's much better for the customer.
The school that was a ray of light in apartheid South Africa
In LLMs, is there a correlation between layer depth and the activations correspondence to the abstract to concrete details continuum?
Counterpoint: I don't know anyone who could answer "no" truthfully. Maybe it's because I am in an older age group?

You're right there are lots of people who can answer "no". However, it's also possible that such a cohort is not a true jury of peers, and remember that juries skew older.

It's possible that screening everyone out who answers "yes" would not be allowed by the judge for this reason. Then, the prosecution would only have a small number of "no reason" exclusions.
Stock movements aren't generally justified.
This looks cool and thoughtfully designed, but I high recommend you add a mobile app so that it’s possible to use it offline. 90% of my 200+ dives have been outside of cell phone coverage.

Also small piece of feedback. The affiliate model being so prominent and with only a lifetime price, I as a consumer don’t have a high level of confidence of this existing for a long time. Especially since it’s web based so you need to keep servers running.
My hunch is that it should be easy to decipher if it’s a AI video based on how the frames transitions.
Oh wow it was up 6.2% at one point this morning from yesterday, now 4.6%.
Yes we allow this right now very easily, although we don't call it "soft shorting". You can remove or de-weight specific stocks or sectors quite easily.
I'm pretty sure the loophole Gödel found in the US constitution that might allow US government to become autocratic was the election of an autocrat president.
Bucky Roberts, Mike Dane, Brad Traversy -

"How did you get so good!"
do you have a link to the tax change?

surely tax changes come in the form of congressional+presidential bills and amendments
But not as bad of a sentence, since you're not in prison.
Some do care, e.g. some camera manufacturers or some news agencies. Surprisingly some social media platforms[1] want clear labels for AI generated content.

[1]: e.g. tiktok https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/partnering-with-our-indust...
Ask app not to track! Ask app not to track!

iykyk
If you're more conspiratorial, nobody called from McDonalds. That was just a cover for whatever creepy spy tech they used.
I believe it is a loss-leader. But these days companies get a pretty direct payout from people who accidentally hold cash in their investment account while on the way to buy ETFs
I certainly wasn't resolute and while I appreciate your sleuthing and clarification, I'm now just a bit more sad than before.
Yes, past Redis venture provided me covered enough that I can avoid trying to maximize the money side. Money still useful of course but one has to balance I believe.
https://artificialanalysis.ai/speech-to-text/models/deepgram

Below 30% for all modern models.
Somewhat unrelated, but I'd love to have an ability to export Google docs to semantic HTML. To easily put legal documents on websites. It is otherwise a big pita in the collaboration with legal and updates to ToS/privacy policy etc.
It is not useful to spam this comment repeatedly under different people who question or disagree with many worlds. Pick one place to make your case.
Creator is here: Please let me know if you have any questions. And thanks for the submitter! It was definitely not me.
>Businesses get sold, circumstances change

Is there really no way to put a binding bylaw in incorporation papers that will survive a sale? Something like a land-use covenant, but for a corporation?

I'm not sure that's necessary for this particular case, but for something like private data exposure I've been playing with the idea that it's the only way to actually trust a company with your data.
That already exists in forms of privacy protection settings on browsers. DNT was a very specific feature. Privacy protections were not removed, DNT was removed.
There's also Pijul. I have only had a brief play with Jujutsu and I haven't tried Sapling but from what I can see, Jujutsu is definitely the best option if you want to actually get stuff done while mostly maintaining Git compatibility.

Pijul is definitely still in the research prototype phase, and definitely not Git compatible. I don't know how Git compatible Sapling is, but large parts of it are still labelled "Not yet supported publicly, OSS is buildable for unsupported experimentation." It also feels like a VCS that was designed for Facebook and then open sourced, so it is targeted at the use case of "massive company monorepo, and we have 10 guys that run the infra". That's great, because Git is bad at that use case, but it might not be what you want.
I might be interested in a broker that would split the kickbacks they get for submitting my trades, fully accounting for that revenue.
Sunsetting Pobox
I disagree. Bank accounts aren’t the solution; regulating the end use cases (ie businesses that don’t accept cash) is a much better option for society.
>A 120,000-foot-tall visitor from another world comes to Earth and initially believes our planet must be devoid of life. But he keeps looking and when he eventually sees a moving speck in the Baltic Sea, he picks it up with his little finger and puts it on his thumbnail. He discovers it's a whale.

>He eventually spots another speck, similar in size, and with his magnifying glass, he realizes it's a boat filled with Arctic explorers... "after having commiserated [with] them for being so small, he asked if they had always been in that pitiful condition little better than annihilation, what they found to do on a globe that appeared to belong to whales, if they were happy if they increased and multiplied, whether they had souls, and a hundred other questions."

"The Sirens of Mars: Searching for Life on Another Planet" — Sarah Stewart Johnson (2020) p.150
The player in this context has an outsized influence on the game, the people managing the game are using their work, and contributing more to it is effectively influencing the game in a big way.

I don't really hate or care about anyone in this game, but it's a non-trivial move in the game.
Which is less readable than using a basic carat, but hey, it shows your 1337 LaTeX skill
https://archive.is/EOGpR
It depends on the audio quality.

Artificial Analysis says Whisper 3 has a 10% word error rate, although it typically does better than that in my experience. When I use Whisper 2 in the ChatGPT app it usually gets 2 or 3 words wrong per paragraph of prompt.
>Last time I was there they wouldn't even record NJ.

>They recorded name on reservation and maybe DOB.

I'm sure the cops can run the same name/DOB combination through the databases of all 50 states + DC, and rule out any that don't match the surveillance footage.
The GameBoy Pocket had a really shockingly crisp screen with very deep blacks. The original GameBoy was quite blurry, especially when scrolling.
They're using Helm, right?
Both Sapling and Jujutsu are compatible with Git repositories, and there are even settings to have the `.git` directory exposed so that all of your existing tools will be able to run Git commands, show hunk changes in the gutter, etc. For all intents and purposes, you can use them in place of or alongside Git, and none of your colleagues will really need to know. This is a significant advantage over competing non-Git systems, and one of the major selling points that incentivize people to even try it at all.

If it means anything, I have been using Git for 15 years and am one of the earliest GitHub users, and I have not regularly used Git for nearly anything, in any job, for over ~1.5 years now. (Disclosure: I am also one of the Jujutsu developers though, so take that for what it is.)
I happened to be in a population of folks, in the 1980s and 1990s, who had a high incidence of AIDS. They currently still have a high incidence of cancer, so I guess you could say that I have a "front-row seat" to the horror.

There were actually some leaked memos, that made it clear that the goal of many denials -especially irt AIDS, because nobody likes gays and addicts- was to hasten or cause the death of the patient (thus, decreasing the cost). If a hospital can't guarantee payment, they won't do the surgery/treatment, so the insurer definitely knows that their action will likely kill the patient. In fact, that's the goal.

I would consider that first-degree, premeditated, murder.

I understand that they are now turning the denials over to AI, so that actual humans don't have to live with the knowledge that they deliberately killed someone else.

But it isn't cool to just kill folks you don't like. The kid needs to be tried for first-degree murder. I do not condone his action, and I'm glad they got him. I just wish they were as circumspect, when it came to the murder of non-CEOs.

I was just commenting that it will be very difficult to find an impartial jury. There's definitely a downside to pissing off every single person in the US.
> Removing this feature harms user agency

It doesn't, because nobody respects it.

It is actually harmful to have a feature that misrepresents its efficiency to users, especially when it comes to privacy and security.

Nobody should ever feel that they will not be tracked because they enabled do-not-track, because it's wrong.

Removing it is the right thing to do because of this.
If Double goes out of business, your assets are safe and held in your name at Apex Clearing. They have processes in place for these scenarios to help you access and transfer those assets.

SIPC protection covers against a brokerage firm failing, which in our case is Apex Clearing. We are not currently a brokerage so SIPC would not apply if Double goes bankrupt.
Is this really interesting to anyone? Asking seriously
If I understand the money flow properly, the government reimburses the ER in some way, removing incentive for the hospital to reduce costs.
Could you please provide me with some examples of incorrect cases? I tried hard to collect accurate data, but it is not easy to do due to the subjectivity of personal preferences.
I leave my cards at home and only carry cash.
This and over-hiring.
I think they trained on one too many closet bifold doors [1].

If you look at the edge of the doors as they swing open, it seems their movement resembles bifold door movement (there's a wiggle to it common to bifold doors that normal doors never have). Plus they seem to magically reveal an inner fold that wasn't there before.

[1]: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=h_&q=interior+bifold+closet+doors&...
That's a good question. The problem is that: I would end doing something in the vector search space probably, or other stuff that are tangent to AI. I can do the same but in public, as examples of hacking with this stuff, to share with the community. In the process I can add a solid vector indexing capability to Redis. It looks like a nice way to continue hacking.