skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Most fish in most US markets aren't worth buying, especially if you pay extra for "wild Alaskan cod" or whatever. Even a good cook will struggle with meat that deteriorated for a couple days in a holding tank, was frozen too slowly, re-thawed to market as "fresh", and frozen again when it didn't sell soon enough.

Farmed atlantic salmon, especially if it's pretty light colored, is the thing I've found that's most likely to be decent in various parts of the country without having to experiment with too many brands. The "belly" cut (with a thinner region where the ribs were) is best.

Luckily, salmon is one of the easier things for a home cook to get right. The higher fat content makes it more forgiving. Lightly salt it, throw it on a lightly oiled sheet pan, and bake at 200F till it's done (around 1hr depending on your oven, recipes usually recommend higher temperatures, but if it's overcooked it's less pleasant, and the lower temperature gives you more leeway as you're learning what that looks like in person -- watch a quick video while it cooks showing what "done" should be, but it's just as the fish starts flaking apart instead of sticking together, and the flakes shouldn't be very firm or dry yet).

Then make something to pair it with. Blacken some asparagus (peel any tough woody bits, especially if it's winter or the asparagus are big) or broccoli for a minute or two in a hot pan, sprinkle with a bit of salt, maybe squeeze in a lemon, and definitely melt a knob of butter over the veggies. Maybe sprinkle in a few pine nuts at that point to toast in the hot pan.

If you want to impress everyone, make a sauce to go with it. The simplest that comes to mind is to heat up some soy sauce, honey, garlic, and ginger together, cooking a minute or two till it's syrupy.

If you added lemon and pine nuts to the veggies, a lemon butter sauce might be appropriate instead. The basic idea is to cook the flavors down till there's not much liquid (e.g., sweating garlic in 1 lemon's worth of juice for 1-2 min), take the pan off the heat, and once it's not much more than room temperature you'll add in a few tablespoons of cold butter, one at a time, and whisk those in till they're melted. Butter is naturally a mixture of fat and water, and if you don't get it too hot it'll stay melted but still "mixed" (emulsified) and give you a thick, creamy sauce. Maybe watch a quick video on the idea first, but even if you "fail" you'll still get something that tastes good and is just thinner than you were attempting to make.
Short-term cognitive boost from exercise may last for 24 hours, suggests study
much hate here; but mostly it is transparent jealousy arising from frustration about the great global money game being unfair and many educated and deserving ppl having no hope of ever making it off the bottom rung.

But jjmaxwell4 don't let any of that distract you

1. This problem (solid, simple, inexpensive) direct indexing is totally real
2. Congrats on identifying this and getting going on it
3. All your best customers are almost certainly not posting on reddit. Again don't let it distract you. This is a great idea
4. Pricing

While you don't want to price on AUM, 1$ is going nowhere fast, and as someone who is jazzed to be an early customer, I would really appreciate it if I could pay more than 1$ (along with everyone else out there) to ensure that the lights stay on and you don't feel pressure to sell to a trash retail bank who will just pepper me with lame cross-sells
What are some examples of computations
That’s true, but the question (minus the robot bit) is a zen koan.
Life in prison is just a delayed death sentence.
I think best when I'm writing (code) though. It keeps my mind focused especially on the task at hand. I've been given feedback that I jump too quickly into code, but that's the way for me to focus. I would prefer to write a quick throwaway prototype as opposed to form some sort of plan or document. Otherwise my mind will wonder or I get some sort of anxiety.
Understanding the Science of DevOps: Key Insights from Accelerate
I wonder what the legal implications are of ignoring a disease until it spreads to your neighbour's farm. Can the neighbour sue for negligence or something?
I don't understand this reasoning. Depending on the target (GPU/DSP/FPGA), going to frequency domain for convolution made some amount of sense when FFT primitives were highly optimized relative to conventional conv or matmul implementations. But now we're like 10 years into the software/hardware arms race and the conv/matmul kernels are just as highly optimized. In addition the hardware has adapted too.

> using Tensor Cores for FFT

Why would I do this when I could just directly use tensor cores for matmul...? We have MMA, WMMA, WGMMA, etc and they all target tensor cores explicitly.
Enabling AI to explain its predictions in plain language
You are asking them to not kill CEOs
That's literally exactly what I wrote in my comment.
For-profit health insurance is the ultimate rent-seeking industry. They provide a net-negative to their customers, scraping profit off the transaction between a patient and their care provider.
Wait 60? Surely not direct reports? I'm guessing you have about 4-5 managers? Impressive that you have the luxury of picking up some coding tasks with 4-5 managers!
This.

It seems very much like that bogus stat that HR departments were peddling 20 years ago about how they only hire the top X% of people because they reject (100-X)% applicants - it tells you nothing about the quality in the gap.

These systems don't have to actively attempt to front-run you or pro-actively make bad trades, they can just optimize for deal flow, which is enough to cause the customer to get a sub-optimal price.
And it's not even a divisive story. Most of the left and right seem to agree on this one. Specially younger people.

Ignore the media stories, their paychecks are written with corporate ad money. On the Internet people of all kinds seem to like the guy.
Chip on board has been around since the 1970s or 80s in some consumer stuff. Putting them on a PCB isn't the same and they were wire bonded, but still the idea of connecting directly to the die was there.
1. "sharks" in this case doesn't mean some guy trading out of his house with 6 monitors. They are institutional investors. They can't exactly open a robinhood account, which only serves actual people. Professional traders also value other niceties, like being able to trade on their desktops (rather than having to type in their orders on their phones), which is worth the 1-2 cents per share in potential savings.

2. It doesn't have to be 100% effective. For every day trader that's beating the market and running over market makers with $1M orders, there's a 100 that's losing everything in ill timed trades on meme stocks. As long as there's less sharks than the public markets, they'll come out ahead.
The gradient information in backroom can be computed similarly to forwards I think. Certainly the FFT blocks are linear and so now it's a question about the multiplication which is pretty compact.
Can someone explain to me what is so special here? It seems to be just a simple binary abstract syntax tree, which with varying syntax can represented by almost any programming language
That's annoying. For some use cases, not a big deal. But I have used the AWS Route 53 'alias' functionality on a number of occasions and that requires the use of Route 53 nameservers.
The 14th Amendment means what the Supreme Court wants it to mean. If an executive order contradicts it, the President (or some Cabinet member) will be sued. And then the Supreme Court will decide.

You can generally "rely" on them to toe the party line for whoever nominated them. Not every time, but even in unexpected cases (like the decision that legalized same-sex marriage), it's going to be close.
I'm an amateur at best but I've only recently realised the implications of the observable universe, that is, we only know of the existence / size of the universe in what we can see, and there may be (and correct me if I'm wrong) way more Stuff beyond this 'boundary' whose light hasn't / will never reach us.
Oh I know, I meant this to be sarcastic and didn't quite land that plane.
Chatbots urged teen to self-harm, suggested murdering parents, lawsuit says
Oh no, gradually increasing heat in online privacy-focused tech discussions! An adtech companies worst nightmare! How will they survive :(
No, you definitely can still call them slaves. From the text of the US 13th Amendment:

> Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Well, they're working on that[1].

[1] https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/10/15/swedens-homici...
One can have an aversion to the act itself without considering the consequences. People who have never gotten in a real fight before don't understand that its actually quite difficult to throw a full-strength punch at someone if you've never done so before. It's not the consequences that you're considering in that moment, but an aversion to the violence itself.
I thought it was just me! You click on their logo/site name, thinking it’ll send you to their main Website... nope! They are doing the same with documentation sites.

Is that better for SEO or what? Not even one link? Or hidden? Who thought that was an awesome idea?
> Maybe give these guys a break?

why should anyone "give them a break"? Aint running a charity here - if they provide sufficient value for the risk, then they will get customers without having them to "give breaks".
> how did he know that the CEO was staying in a hotel other than Hilton

Because someone paid that much money stays at a fancier place, like one of the Conrads or Waldorf Astorias. Hilton's a mid-level brand.

Or, you follow him from the conference center the day before.
It definitely helps to visualize what the experience of using it is like, thanks a lot!
Absolutely.

My issue is really on the other end of that scale, where getting C-suites to recognize when owning that core competency is actually beneficial to the company even if its not the focus of the company.

I grew up around companies leveraging vertical integration at the right scales to improve costs, seeing companies go the opposite direction trading all those advantages for often never-materializing benefits is... frustrating.
Thankfully don’t admire anyone that kills people to boost profits
But debanking is not a criminal charge. The US has thousands of banks, surely one of them would take your business.
Notice how the most interesting part, the image with their quantum computing roadmap, has too low a resolution to read the relevant text at the bottom. Come on Google.
Yes and no.

The classic Nalimov bases don't, at all (pure DTM).

The Syzygy bases that are the most common now do, but in a kind of weird way (DTZ50); they try to get to the next zeroing move (pawn push or piece capture) as soon as possible, which means they play optimally from a win/draw/loss perspective no matter what the 50-move counter is but appear to play super-strangely (e.g. they may sacrifice a queen and go into a super-tricky won ending, instead of finding a mate in five).

Galen Huntington has made proper DTM50 bases (http://galen.metapath.org/egtb50/), which basically treats each position as different depending on the DTZ counter, i.e. “kings on a1 and a8 and a queen on c4” is really 100 different positions depending on who is to move and what the DTZ counter is, where some of them may have different mate distances and/or different results. That will give the shortest possible mate _and_ always take the 50-move rule into account. But they are not public, much larger than the Syzygy bases and generally more of a research project.

Any engine that uses tablebases in its search will generally end up playing pretty strangely on the “knowledge horizon”, even when using DTM50 bases, for the simple reason that they will be happy to reach anything the tablebase says is a win, by any means. (E.g., again, if you have 8 pieces and 7-man tablebases and you don't see any other way of mating, sacrificing your queen to get into a won 7-man ending will be your best move.)
this will potentially be a self-defense case. since the shooter had chronic back pain, he could argue that shooting the ceo who denied his healthcare was his only means of protecting himself
Yeah, totally. It’s not even just bad work, but I’m constantly breaking down shots as I’m watching them.

Especially because I’ve done both on set and virtual production, it’s hard to suspend disbelief in a lot of films.
> There's no such thing as a free lunch.

OK, but American "lunch" costs 2-3x what it does everywhere else, with similar/worse outcomes.

(And yes, that's counting taxes.)

We're ordering oatmeal and being charged wagyu filet prices.

I, at this moment, have a syringe with a mililiter of fluid on my desk that's worth more than both of my cars combined. https://imgur.com/a/HzqgLa2

It's about 1/10th that in the UK.
Did you mean to write sugars specifically as opposed to carbs that can be used to supply energy to the human body?

I.e., wouldn't enough rice and potatoes suffice?
Why bring the military into it at all? The US government already spends more ON HEALTHCARE than everyone else and still can't seem to figure it out.
As someone that loves big vehicles and knows they are not going away, I see two practical solutions. Either make all the big trucks cab-over like modern busses or have "AI" cameras in the front that will detect living things and give both the driver and human or animal in front of the vehicle a loud klaxon [1] and flashing lights. Or both. My request is entirely selfish as it would save some of my dumb deer auto-flashing headlights and would save many peoples bumpers and headlights.

[1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvElmVUXlkE [video][27 seconds]
That's not really how it works, though, as the counter is reset back to 0 once a capture happens or a pawn is moved (as both of those are irreversible and thus represent some abstract proof of progress towards a resolution of the game).
I think you misunderstand me. I’m not telling them to give up or expressing hope that they don’t succeed. I’m identifying what I see as a major barrier to adoption. I’d be interested in a response that addresses those points.
PAYMENT-FOR-ORDER-FLOW IS GOOD FOR YOU. There, I said it. [Source: I have 10 years of HFT / market making experience]

PFOF is misunderstood, as others pointed out here. However, it's not a 'win win win'; it's more like a 'win win lose'. This is something even media gets wrong all the time. I've only seen this mentioned as a footnote in Matt Levine.

[Note: I don't know if Double is doing it, or if they plan to - this is just a general summary].

So:

* Win: Citadel (etc.) make money by trading against order flow that's more benign than the resting orders in public exchanges.

* Win: The client gets a better execution price than the publicly displayed bid/ask. Back when I started (20+ years ago, yes, I'm old) this was 1/100 of a penny, the legal minimum (due to minimum tick print size). But recently, the market orders in my personal account have been getting price improvement of almost half the spread.

Things are a bit different in some options exchanges, where retail flow gets some priority, regardless of when you joined a given price point at the order book queue. But almost all equity exchanges use price-time priority, you're almost guaranteed adverse selection.

Example for those who may need it: if you place a buy limit @ $1.07 in a 1.07 (bid) - 1.08 (ask) market. Then, the bids at 1.07 slowly disappear, because firms such as "Shark Holdings, LLC" (the trading firm consisting solely of quants with unpronounceable foreign-sounding names) will cancel their bids if they sense the market is going down, e.g. if they observe a lot of trades at the bid. Then, the new market will be 1.06-1.07, and you will have sold at the ask.

OK, so here's who loses: any large orders that have to trade in the open markets (not 'dark pools', ATS, etc.) will be stuck with more 'toxic' orders, and get worse execution. The question is: do I gain more as an individual from having my (quasi-entertainment-value, usually small) personal account orders get better execution? or do I lose more by having my indirect trading (possibly an index fund that I hold my retirement money in) get worse execution? I think it's the latter. But nobody connects the dots and/or seems to care. [Of course, this is more complicated, because large institutional orders aren't 100% on behalf of small investors.]

You may say this component of market structure is stupid/wrong/suboptimal. I personally think so. But this is the reality of it. It's encased in rules. There was some attempt to get rid of PFOF a couple of years ago, but it failed. So that's not going away.

So this is a win-win-lose: it's globally suboptimal, but for the 2 first 'wins', it's locally optimal.

Summary: although PFOF has bad optics and stimulates pitchfork-y instincts ("big bad evil companies are out to gitcha", etc.), if your broker doesn't do it, you're both leaving money on the table - and guess what, they'd have to charge you some other way.
> Companies that never respected DNT aren't going to respect GPC.

It depends. While I agree that GPC is technically just a more complicated form of DNT, the major difference is that DNT is 100% optional for websites to honor, which is why they don't, but GPC becomes mandatory for nations that have reasonable laws around tracking. Companies operating in those nations will honor it because there are legal penalties if they don't.
> I had spent years trying to work out why everyone was so especially unkind to me.

It is also possible that you met your fair share of assholes.
Compared to the amount of reactions I see in the posts, I suspects users are deterred to comment because a big part of GitHub is "work related" and it could be seen as an endorsement to a murderer
Yeah, FWIW I think their disclosures look good, but I want some explicit reassurance. I want to ensure "in your name" is not the same thing as "for benefit of".

The thing that actually gives me the most reassurance is that they say definitively that they are a Registered Investment Advisor. In the Synapse situation, all the regulatory agencies were essentially saying "not my problem" because Synapse itself wasn't covered under any explicit regulatory regime. That doesn't seem to be the case here, but I'd feel better if the founders said something along the lines of "This is how we're different from Synapse..."
this is the correct answer, as long as health care is for-profit we will always be the product instead of the consumer
So, forgive me if I am wrong, but from my primitive YouTube "research", people said that the beauty of binary is that its relatively easy to see weather or not there is voltage, even with fluctuations of power. How does your processor compensate for that, meaning how does it measure out 3 different values. I could be wrong, and am willing to learn. But I enjoy your idea, and I am willing to help you especially when it comes to software.
> It sucks the costs are so high, but their situation does not fill me with the anger and indignation like others I've read

You might just not have enough empathy and aren’t paying attention to how the entire system is rigged against humans attempting to obtain care.

“If it’s just about money,” we can fix that, money is a fake construct. Policy is, supposedly (but not actually), collectively agreed upon. We choose not to fix this. Some will do nothing about this. Some will do something.
This is partially the result of being taught that every opinion is valid. What was taught as a nicety (don’t dismiss other people’s opinions was the intention) has evolved into all opinions are equal.

If all opinions are equal, and we’ve reinforced that you can find anything to strengthen an opinion, then facts don’t actually matter.

But I don’t think it’s actually all that recent. History is full of people saying that facts or logic don’t matter. The Americas were “discovered” by such a phenomenon.
So what would happen if were in that situation and then went to another bank?
We can ACAT in existing positions to an Index yes, which would be "seeding" an index with shares you already own.

As for taxes, we provide a yearly summary for realized gains and losses that most tax professional can plug into their software.

And for TLH, yes for larger portfolios (above 20 tickers) we create a factor model of the portfolio using 4 factors - Momentum, Value, Quality and Min Volatility. When a stock is identified for TLH purposes, we will sell it and try and bring your overall portfolios factor exposure back in line. This provides for a much more flexible and robust way to do tax loss harvesting because not every stock has a relevant pair (for example a stock that just recently merged with another business might have no clear comparables)
i wonder if Xylella has already spread to beyond Europe?
Are there reports of it being a problem in the middle east and north africa as well?
It’s not a tautology. The aversion to killing is an inherent psychological thing. Some things are just fundamental to a person’s psychology. Some people have such a strong aversion to spiders that they can’t go near one, even when they know for certain that it’s harmless and there would be no consequences. And psychologically healthy people have that sort of aversion to killing another person. It’s inherent programming.

How often do fights end without police intervention? How many times do people get angry and decide not to escalate it to the point of murder even when they could get away with it? People do sometimes end up in situations where they could get away with killing. They rarely take advantage.

You’re probably familiar with _The Lord of the Flies_. We need order and authority, otherwise we’ll descend into savagery, right? Except this scenario has actually happened, and in real life the boys worked together peacefully to survive until help came.

When you mention “a bad outcome” you include harm to someone we care about. The vast majority of people consider a person’s death to be a bad outcome even if they don’t care about that person in particular.

I think you’re conflating two very separate ideas here. There’s the idea of the natural consequences of an action, and then there’s the idea of consequences imposed by some authority. The original comment I replied to was talking entirely about the latter. Here you discuss both but you treat them the same. But someone who refrains from killing because they don’t like the consequence of someone being dead is very different from someone who refrains from killing because they don’t want to go to prison.

There are really three different things here: 1) people don’t kill because of the legal or physical consequences to themselves 2) people don’t kill because they don’t like the outcome of a dead person 3) people don’t kill because they fundamentally don’t want to. There are examples of all 3. The vast majority of people aren’t in category 1. I think they’re almost all in 3, but there’s no practical difference between 2 and 3.
Wait, you eat only beef? Or beef as the only source of meat?
Something I never understood is why trees seem to be ill so rarely. There is a gazillion infectious agents on Earth from viruses to fungi, mammals are barely keeping up even with our adaptive immune system and fever. Plants lack all of that and yet some trees live for centuries or millennia when undisturbed.

I realize that are many factors skewing the observation: trees may be sick without us noticing, most of the trees die very early and we observe ones that get mature, some trees are in fact visibly sick etc. What I don't know is if these factors combined explain it all or not. My gut feeling tells me that without an adaptive immune response trees must be sick way more often than we see, but I have no proof.
Not happening. Tools almost never generate what you want. And you can't tweak anything unless you understand that deeply.