skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not really.

1. Most Americans are not paycheck-to-paycheck. It is what politicians constantly say depending on whether they are in power or not.

https://old.reddit.com/r/AskEconomics/comments/1dbpaag/do_th...

2. Americans have higher disposable income at all income levels than Europeans (Western Europe included).

https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/xgoouz/americans_ha...
so what? "that's the way it's usually done" ?
> ChatGPT gets confused and fabricates stuff as much as a person speaking whatever comes to their mind.

Which is useless for the same reason you wouldn't "learn" from a friend that says "I just watched a pig fly!"

> But at the very least, it's not lying to you intentionally.

It's in fact worse that way. If someone lies with intent then they can at least admit it when I challenge their rhetoric. If ChatGPT can't lie intentionally, how is it supposed to know when it's deliberately telling the truth?
Yes, a strong military protects you. See: all of human history. Do you think Ukrainians would perhaps have personally benefited if they still had their nuclear deterrence? Or if they had been given 10x military aid before February 2022? The fact is Anduril systems are deployed in Ukraine today, helping to protect Ukrainian lives. If you want to see what happens when you don't have a strong military, look to Bucha.
"tell me about potential issues while doing X", then dig into answers? We may get there one day with LLMs, but currently it would be extremely hard to keep the conversation context and process the longer answers while talking to someone. The voice recognition quality and generating speed would be an issue too if you wanted to monitor the whole conversation.

Currently the cheating mostly aims for coding tasks because they're pretty simple to do and self-contained. Much less for helping with a good dialog.
It's great that POSIX sh is available everywhere except where it isn't (Windows).

In all SW teams I've been in except one, sh was available, and people preferred writing things in something else (usually Python/Perl). I have had an order of magnitude more success convincing teammates to use just than convincing them to use sh.

It may be ubiquitous, but it's useless if you can't convince non-shell gurus to use it.
The first thing that popped into my head after reading this was the large container of Kirkland honey I have.

I thought: “Costco wouldn’t lie to me? Would they?”

Now I must go and find out.
Maybe worth reminding the self-documenting Makefile [0] discussed here.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30137254
There’s an argument to be made that by the time your business runs out of vetted candidates to hire you’re already staffed at some of the highest levels by corporate parasites who got there by gaming the system, and you can tolerate adding more elsewhere.
Interview performance used to be correlated to job aptitude, but no longer.
First line of the article:
> Jensen Huang, the chief executive of Nvidia, is the 10th-richest person in the United States, worth $127 billion

I haven't been paying attention to the bullshit that is nth-richest person but how the fuck is someone worth that much and is only in 10th place? Wasn't it not too long ago that $127B would have been 1st?
My intuition given the rapid, informal developments of agent-type systems is that this is obvious insofar as the initial dataset was formed from a huge hidden "data cleaning" task that was human evolution and society. This isn't really that interesting of a claim and is it clear that it holds if you simply loop the LLM back onto the data cleaning task itself as a critic to the new training set? Is this what the author would classify as fine tuning?

Another question is what is the interpretation of the output of an LLM generation when unprompted? Isn't that always effectively garbage when there's not a deliberate bias in the training set?
What business task would you delegate to AI for $299/month?
I sounds to me like you are really upset about something awful that happened to you or people you care about, and not sharing the full story.
While I don't always love 'denominalization' (if I that's the right word), the verb 'speed' is a common one, e.g., 'speed up'.

Every word we use was created at some point, often in the same way. There is nothing magical about the people and the words they created in 1824 that makes them better than us and words we create in 2024, except perhaps that the 1824 words we still use have stood the test of time.

Also, as far as I can tell, the verb form is as old as the noun form.
If you do test-after you have to keep a mental tally of new scenarios to test when making code changes. This makes it more unreliable since it's easy to forget one of those scenarios or mix it up with an already tested scenario.

TDD lets you safely forget by tying the test pass/failure directly to the code.

So, yes, you can do test-after but why?

The only reason Ive ever heard for doing it after anyway is "I just prefer it that way".

Not writing tests at all makes sense (e.g. for a spike), but if I were going to start writing tests at any point I cant see any reason not to do it with TDD.
Tiled Menu in Plasma – A Windowsy Linux Experience (2021)
Has anyone tried Microsoft's fluid framework for collaborative editing?

https://github.com/microsoft/FluidFramework

https://fluidframework.com/
Just because they're not lying doesn't mean they've done the work of finding out whether the honey is pure.
> "give 1x work -same as before- and take x1.5 money"

This is exactly my case.

Here are my w2 compensation (salary+bonus+rsu) changes YoY working at $Yelp and $Grab:

2025 35.96% (projected)

2024 20.77% (projected)

2023 30.39%

2022 -0.65% <- promotion

2021 34.25%

2020 65.06% <- job change (December 2020; 2020 had a big jump due to unemployment in 2019)

I don't think my work hours, responsibilities, or work stress has any connection to my compensation or career growth, primarily due to the "work smart, not hard" thinking.

Even if you have zero promotions or changes in responsibility, RSU grants compound, even if your salary increase by only 1-6% (like mine did)
OSF/1, Digital Unix, and Tru64 are the same OS at different points in time.

Technically OSF/1 was supposed to be the commercial BSD answer to System V, in practice only several niche vendors used it, plus Digital and NeXT (and through NeXT, Apple which continues the line to this day)
Why do you need ads for that? Why doesn't your research for things that you buy not start with looking up the list of all prominent contenders in that niche?
A few months ago I found out my FireTV enabled smart TV supports Steam Link. I had to sideload the APK, but once it was installed the game streaming worked great at 1080p.

You can get a surprising amount of hardware to work as a game streaming frontend if your internet is fast enough. Moonlight-Switch is also interesting if you've got a jailbroken Switch sitting around like I do:

https://github.com/XITRIX/Moonlight-Switch

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9553519/135712658-...
No it doesn’t.

Trump started it, Biden finished it. The only negative is “Biden didn’t listen to two people” which I think we all agree is a good thing.
Regulation is necessary to a free market. Otherwise powerful forces in the market will make it non-free for everyone else or make it non-free for honest business by forcing them to do illicit things to be competitive.
You are wrong. I've lived in both a small and a large city, both tiny compared to the average european metropolis...
The wealth gap is widening.
My theory is that he's getting alimony from his big tech ex-wife that supported him through his previous startups(pulling this out of my ass).
I do wonder what's keeping people there long term.

With that amount of money you can have an amazing life in so many places on this earth, and these people definitely have the resources to do that. Have these people never experienced life abroad? Quality of life is much higher elsewhere.
Yep I found this approach works great.

I have a personally-owned domain name connected to my [paid] account with a smaller email provider.

The domain is managed at a large well-known registrar, I keep it paid up 3+ years in advance, and make sure to keep my contact information up to date.

If anything goes wrong with the email provider (including going out of business), I will just redirect from my DNS settings. If I get locked out of my domain for some reason, there are clear next steps for me to open a ticket with the registrar and move towards resolving the issue.

I got it all hooked up in an afternoon, many years ago, and it was completely set-it-and-forget-it, besides logging into the registrar occasionally to extend the domain ownership.

(continuous backups are another matter - mine aren't fully automated yet)
While shell syntax may be quirky, it absolutely allows you to write scripts that are simple, easy to understand, and maintainable.
Some of the best tests come from taking something mundane and twisting it just a little off the beaten path in a way that LLMs cannot handle. The usual example is the river crossing puzzle which has a standard format and solution but can be modified to make that solution incorrect. For code, an example would be parsing log lines to compile insights but switching it up so that the timestamp means something other than the time the log was collected, etc.

You can completely change the complexity of a bog standard leetcode question with the slightest of modifications, and I’m certain no extant LLM will catch such a nuance if your problem is a very common one.

A fun exercise is to ask chatGPT what the river crossing goat puzzle is and then say “do the same puzzle but with two goats and a cabbage please”. It can’t get it right even with multiple corrections. Might stop working at some point now that I posted this though!
Unfortunately real life problems involve a lot of context and introducing that to interviews is hard.
It either requires a long conversation where someone might lose track, or involve writing a large ish code base and getting them to work on that (which is a lot of work, and once again they don’t have context).

In my experience if a problem simple enough to be completed in an hour, it’s simple enough for AI.
My job? I don't rely on any software that costs more than $10 a month and it would take something radically capable to change that. Some people on HN forget; $299/month is the price of leasing a car.
Where is the list? And what if I don't know the category exists?
You could use Godot (has a nice set of GUI widgets in addition to the game-specific stuff) or Lazarus (Free Pascal IDE) for instance. I did not use Lazarus much, but Free Pascal as a compiler and the language is nice and stable and supports a long list of platforms, generating native code (including cross-compiling between many different pairs of platforms).

https://www.lazarus-ide.org/
I don't understand what you're trying to say here
Google's Genie 2 "world model" reveal leaves more questions than answers
That still breaks my head. Reaching your minimum speed slower means you have a higher speed for a longer time, covering more distance?

I know nothing about racing, is it maybe about reaching a higher minimum speed by doing so before the curve?
I’ve always been shocked there are not way more common parts between vehicles and brands.

Alternators, starters, ac compressors and so much more could just be small, medium, large, extra large.

The price would drop dramatically.
Na dude, they are chill. They produce more under your friendship so you can keep a little. If they think the relationship is going toxic they just leave. It's awesome
1. I don't follow. I work with Elixir, Golang and Rust and I use their dependency managers just fine. F.ex. I have `just deps` that does `mix deps.get` in Elixir and `go get -u ./... && go mod tidy && go mod vendor` in Golang. Furthermore, `just` does not claim to do dependency management. So what do you mean here?

2. Sure but I am not paid for it. Nobody will look at me with admiration if I delay an important milestone with 2 weeks (or, more likely, 2 years) to invent such a tool. :/ So not sure I get you here either.

3. We're veering into bikeshedding here and I will not argue; use whatever interface works best for you. I personally love having `just up` / `just down` / `just start` / `just stop` for my development dependencies of any project project. No more one big shared Postgres instance that if I screw it up (and homebrew did that a number of times!) I'll have to dig through TimeMachine for DB backups. I wisened up eventually and started making scheduled exhaustive backups of each DB... and then said to myself "forget it" and just started using separate containers for each project. For my work I found wrapping the tools worth it for not having to remember their bespoke full command lines. I standardized my tasks and I can enter almost any directory and run the same `just ...` commands and get what I expect as a result. To me that's valuable. But again, use whatever is convenient for you. No argument from me.

4. I don't disagree here and I am kind of 50/50 because on the one hand this is failure of process + lack of proper dev/ops tooling (f.ex. deleting this or that should raise alarms i.e. every such repository should have CI that makes sure everything important stays in place). On the other hand if Nix or anything else spares you from having to install those guard rails then sure, then it's a good fit for you. For my work and hobbies Nix is a net negative and I gave it more than a fair chance and I had enough of opinionated diva-like tools whose message is "learn everything about me to love me, baby". No thanks. But that's just a single example. Again, if there are tools that spare you from screwing up something accidentally, I usually vote strongly in favor of them.
Closing the loopholes is like writing a bug-free program. I.e. practically impossible. You can criminalize any exploits though (just like with software and security exploits).
Rich get richer, poor get poorer. Something like that.

But mostly, because technology has ASTOUNDING margins and markets that are, essentially, winner takes all, the richest people are now tech instead of oil or resources like they used to be.

We will see the world's first trillionaire. It will happen in our lifetime.

Unless the trend of murdering the ultra wealthy actually kicks off. Then maybe not.
Only before 10.7 from userspace with CGDisplayBaseAddress

https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/Gr...

After 10.7 (and certainly post-Metal) I don't think the framebuffer is accessible via userspace, you'd probably need to create a kernel extension to expose it somehow.

Although windowserver must write to the framebuffer somehow so there's probably a private API as well
Do you know where you got this idea? I've seen it endlessly repeated, but I've been unable to trace it to any authoritative source.

In any case, it's completely wrong. Dr. Shi herself didn't expect natural spillover anywhere near Wuhan:

> We have done bat virus surveillance in Hubei Province for many years, but have not found that bats in Wuhan or even the wider Hubei Province carry any coronaviruses that are closely related to SARS-CoV-2. I don't think the spillover from bats to humans occurred in Wuhan or in Hubei Province.

https://web.archive.org/web/20210727042832/https://www.scien...

She could be wrong, but the idea that she chose her work location based on the natural abundance of sarbecoviruses is unequivocally false.

The BSL-4 also isn't very relevant. As described in the link above, the WIV worked at BSL-2, with correspondingly greater risk of an incident if one of their viruses turned out to infect humans. The point of extraordinary coincidence is their collection of novel sarbecoviruses, which was the biggest anywhere in the world.
The author could have easily written the same article with vague personal opinions of how their own code isn't perfect for a slightly different set of default assumptions of how buttons should be used. Not everyone wants to dive into <form> behavior oddities like changing element's default behaviors or automatically reloading the page on submission nor do they want to assume the best label in the graphical context always matches the best label in the screen reader context. Doesn't make their example actually bad, it just means short examples are always easy to nit about.

One thing I liked about the article is it's a longer dive instead of a short answer, meaning you get more of the nuance presented to you instead of assumed. Of course, it looks like the same thing comes from either source if you set out to ask for a detailed explanation.

Also, FWIW since these will all vary anyways, I do actually like the full answer I got from ChatGPT more overall than the one at the end of their article. Even despite that it doesn't bother mentioning form considerations it gives more full answers to the points in the "hand tailored" response, as well as covering when you should consider using a separate aria-label or not https://chatgpt.com/share/e/6754aaad-823c-8010-a5ad-96eff5f0....
Of course. Free markets in the sense of being completely unregulated, are logically incompatible with regulated ones.

As a consumer, I want a regulated market. I want product safety and a lack of fraud.
Seems like a propaganda piece to justify DRM and remote attestation in the name of security.

> It provides a vastly more efficient and secure platform for Windows 11...

Efficient? Huh?

> to use through advanced encryption methods, improved industry standard cryptography, ...

Really? All of those are run on CPU or controllers on data path, not TPM. TPM is actually quite slow.

> and greater interoperability with other security functions.

What?!

--

About the only thing it does that a regular user may desire is storing disk encryption keys and secure enclave for application encryption keys. Everything else is desirable by Microsoft, the manufacturer, and Hollywood.
Isn't criminalizing the exploits in a law just closing the loopholes in the law? I don't think I'm smart enough to understand the difference.
I haven't made an argument against it either. I merely estimated the realistic impact.
> But side projects can have revenue increase 20% MRR.
Also, within companies, you

Or, more likely, 0%
Nice, thanks a lot. Unfortunately I am quite swamped recently so I will definitely cannot help you with feature requests and testing but I have bookmarked frof and absolutely will be giving it a try.

Just one thing I would dislike... Python. How easy it is to run frof without having to fiddle with venvs and such?
How about we eliminate billionaires while we're at it? To auto-adjust this for inflation, it can be defined as the current cost of 10,000 kg of gold. That's 10 metric tons which is a very generous amount for any individual.
> conducted by an exec or someone less-technical

It only works if you are technical. Yes, your sales guy will not know a diamond from a fugazi.

But as a senior tech guy, I don't think it's ever gone wrong. I've never hired a guy who I thought could code and it turns out he couldn't.

You have to be willing to have the conversation with only a few scripted questions, just a few essentials. Everything else an open field. You let them sculpt it into a garden or dig their own grave, either way you give them a shovel.
It is real information, it is just information that is not targeted at anything in particular. Random passwords are, well, random. That they are random and information is what makes them useful as passwords.

As said by others, There is nothing terribly insightful about making something estimate the output of another by a non-perfect reproduction mechanism and noticing the output is different. Absent any particular guidance the difference will not be targeted. That is tautologically obvious.

The difference is still information though, and with guidance you can target the difference to perform some goal. This is essentially what the gpt-o1 training
was doing. Training on data generated by itself, but only when the generated data produced the correct answer.
Don’t worry at all, I think your original post was fine too, and I agree with what you say! I think some of this comes down to personal preference, how you want to relate to the world, and who you want to surround yourself with. “Different strokes for different folks” :)
I started writing my tasks in mise (https://mise.jdx.dev/tasks/) instead of just, but I found that others didn’t want to install it. Something about mise being an all-in-one tool—combining asdf/direnv/virtualenv/global npm/task management—made installing it just for the task feature off-putting. At least that's my theory. So, I’m back to using just. I am happy that there isn't a ton of pushback on adding a justfile here and there. Maybe it’s the name—‘just’ feels lightweight and is known to be fast, so people are cool with it.
>(I had no mobile number attached to it)

That's just heresy for Google.
Just recipes accepting command line arts and supporting documentation might be enough to finally push me away from Make.
This is the thing that actually worries me the most about AI. Right now there are meaningful practical obstacles to, say, manufacturing ricin or 3-D printing a working gun or figuring out how to kill somebody with a drone, and apparently these practical obstacles are enough to deter a nutso but insufficiently committed/intelligent/methodical would-be assassin, but if you have a chatbot that will happily talk you through the whole process, maybe that equilibrium changes.
What I had heard was that anything that isn't "single source" likely has sugar syrup added. this includes all major brands. I wouldn't even trust the expensive "organic" versions of big brands. Apparently exported Chinese "honey" is the main offender which gets mixed with other sources.

Two of the supermarkets in the UK I shop in have their own brand "Spanish Forest Honey", that claims to be single source from Spain. I have no reason to not trust that it is yet. It is about x2-3 more expensive than the big mainstream brands, darker and tastes stronger.

The Spanish producers could be adding sugar syrup as well I suppose, but aside from hunting down honey from farmers markets it's the best option I have.
Ever wonder how Aspirin was made? MIT ASKCOS makes planning reactions easy!
I don't think this post applies much critical considerations on the reality we live in. Just pulling some of the examples at the start of the article and giving an alternative interpretation:

> Helsing has a contract making German Eurofighters able to detect radar lock-on (which indicates the aircraft may be being targeted by AAW, Anti Aircraft Warfare). This could help make German Eurofighters more “survivable”, which includes the ones that carry Nuclear Weapons for deterrence. They argue this helps ensure German nuclear deterrence isn’t nullified by AAW, ensuring peace.

Germany does not own their own nuclear weapons. It may host US/NATO nuclear weapons, but they're not German. Perhaps this German fighter was destroying an unoccupied bridge to stop the advance of enemy troops that were about to kill and rape a village of citizens. Does this now make the plane "good" and no longer "evil"?

> Autonomous drone flight control systems for Ukraine, including “GPS Denied” option (navigating while GPS is being jammed). It was impossible to confirm IRL whether or not this is purely reconnaissance or navigating and dropping payloads on targets. However, it is likely part of a kill chain, as even SIGINT will likely be used for e.g. artillery fire.

Perhaps this will also be used by the civilian aviation industry which currently suffers the same GPS interference. Would the author prefer a precise artillery strike that disables an opponent or imprecise artillery that may destroy kilometres of land and housing and ancillary buildings (and potentially innocent lives)?
I am building a new way for people to buy homes
This appears to be a code injection in a PR branch name, not an AI model compromise..
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wealth-distribution-in-amer...