skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Wow, you're really confused about the basics of constitutional law. How sad. Boeing as a corporation is in the process of pleading guilty to a crime, and as part of that they can be punished in a variety of ways such as fine. But Boeing shareholders haven't been accused of any crime and are not defendants in this case. The shareholders are legally separate from the corporation. There is no legal mechanism to seize their shares as punishment, and hypothetically if Boeing were to be forcibly nationalized then the government would be forced to pay shareholders at the market rate.
it's no worse than 2024 amazon
You didn’t even use it yet why bash it?
Is there any evidence that Meta directly lobbied for the ban?
Did you actually click it and get the classic result or are you just speculating? I tried to test it as soon as I posted it and did not see the objectionable but went directly to the post.
that's pretty funny!

maybe a political-science researcher, not from Germany would give a less tone-based definition.
> You don't owe your children much more than food, love and a roof over their head.

except that "love" part is a huge bucket that includes pretty much everything that we do for our kids (which is a heck of a lot more than food and shelter)

> expectation

it's not social expectation that drive what we sacrifice for our children; it's our love for our children that does, at least the parents I know (including myself)
Trump says lots of things. What he will do depends on which advisor/donor gets in his ear, and when.
I'm OK with US banning TikTok on whatever legal lawfare/loophole it chooses to conjure, the goal is afterall to ban TikTok, realstically not just from US but from world via US control of app stores. The "wildness" is not targetting TikTok per say, but the specific tactic of requiring divestment, i.e. literally trying to nationalize (or rather de-nationalize) another countries company (and let's be real ByteDance is PRC even if incorporated in Singapore). Even PRC doesn't go further than a 51/49 JV. They'll have sectoral black/white lists, but that includes/precludes everyone, not country specific. It's just comes off as extra fragile rule-by-law behaviour on platforms even relative to PRC, but as I reiterate elsewhere, that's US perogative, I don't find it "wrong", just highlighting how it's extreme even by PRC standards.
Yes, I see the classic ball-in-cup result when I click.
Parents chose to have children, how many (i.e. how much their attention is divided), how they'll raise them (with near absolute authority), and pick 50% of the kids' genes (via the other parent). Children chose nothing. They owe nothing.

It's selfish to demand your children be personally responsible for you.

Making young people miserable under the crushing weight of caring for themselves and their irresponsible elders won't inspire them to produce and share grandkids.
Exactly. Microsoft wants lots of cash for Copilot, meanwhile, we had Code Llama running with 150 developers before the Microsoft idiots could schedule a meeting.
It’s sad that people think this way. As a young child growing up in the 90s in a rural part of a small country, being able to access the “speech” of people around the world via internet forums was a revelation.

Are you really so scared of China that you’d throw that all away?
Hallucination prone decision making tied to killer machines. That's extremely dystopian sounding. :(
3D Terrain Renderer with React and the DOM
The Pentium FDIV bug, reverse-engineered
I think it was ok to optimize the decrement then jump before publishing 100k hard copies of the code made from trees.

also, great story:

https://www.folklore.org/Saving_Lives.html
I actually think the electoral college is a solution to a problem so obvious to anyone living then that no one really thought to name it: validating an election.

It’s 1789, and you’re designing a voting-based system. You’ve decided each state gets votes proportional to its population in the presidential election. How do you validate that the result you got from Georgia, two weeks’ travel from NYC, is trustworthy? Seals? They can be tampered with. What about special messengers? Someone could impersonate them.

Solution: send dignitaries that can vouch for each other. The elite of neighboring states is likely to know each other, and you establish a chain of trust up and down the coast. Great!

Except these are people with better things to do than to be errand boys. There has to be something in it for them. Solution: they get to cast the final ballot for President. They are electors.

(This is a theory that I have not validated at all, to be clear.)
Fair enough, I like having friends but have a hard time figuring out when to fit them into my schedule.

In this case, I know my friend's friend talked about constant overtime and not having a life outside of the office.

I sent Mai this video of the crazy day-in-the-life of a salaryman in Japan [1], and we both felt it was crazy, but she said "I actually think he likes it". Some people are cut out for overtime every day but I know I'd go crazy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tmjXp_AYg0

---

Unrelated, but I (sort of) wish English had an obviative case. It's hard to give a story about a friend and their friend of the same gender in English without ambiguity, hence why I gave [person 1] a name.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obviative
Fun site to check from time to time: https://www.web3isgoinggreat.com/
This resource looks very bad to me as they don't check batched inference at all. This might make sense now when most people a just running single query at once, but pretty soon almost everything will be running queries in parallel to take advantage of the compute.
You are always wishing that there is more people buying after you and more than sellers. Is all
Bit of a weak ooga-booga comment.

No, humans are not cavemen, as cavemen lived thousands of years ago and had a different lifestyle than modern humans. The term "caveman" is a stock character that became popular in the early 20th century.

~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caveman
Tik tok is one of many news sources in Romania. If a local journal decides to support a candidate after that one of its big advertiser asks them to, do we cancel the election?
When I hear "intrinsic value", I these days want to talk about what exactly this is.

Cryptocurrencies are an important invention, and it looks like it needs to go through the period of when many don't know what to do and how to deal with it. Reminds me electricity in XIX century.
"who buys a brother" eyes shift left
Sorry, I just realized my test was bad, you are correct. Unfortunately it is too late for me to delete this submission.
It's a podcast. They're only useful for entertainment. If you take advice from them in a meaningful way you're effectively rolling the dice on tabloid grade slop factories.
He won’t ban it he’s saving it as a chip for bargains
>photographers need a proper reference for color correction

easily solved with a chip chart. they even have them "pocket" sized.
> They have no intrinsic value, ...

Which is the case for pretty much all crypto.
I can vouch for this advice. I had an encounter with a bad employer and a 6 month period without a job. I ended up taking a position somewhere that treated me like a freak for it and tried to use it to weaken negotiation. Additionally, they took issue to me not having many multi-year roles. Normally, I'd not tolerate that, but sometimes you just need health insurance (thanks, USA).

That place ended up being a terrible place to work for a number of reasons. I eventually found a much better team who didn't question any of that. It was an entirely freeing experience. It truthfully would have been a liability to stay there any longer as the leadership and technical skills were not there. I left alongside many other people and haven't looked back.
The same article also says:

> Historian Ian Kershaw once wrote that "trying to define 'fascism' is like trying to nail jelly to the wall."[28] Each group described as "fascist" has at least some unique elements, and frequently definitions of "fascism" have been criticized as either too broad or too narrow. According to many scholars, fascists—especially when they're in power—have historically attacked communism, conservatism, and parliamentary liberalism, attracting support primarily from the far-right.[30]

So, rather than purporting to define "fascism", the article acknowledges it has many definitions and it is contested which one is right. Read in the context of the whole section "Definitions", I don't think the opening sentence should be read as a definition, except in a very vague ballpark sense, which isn't meant to be used in decisively answering the question of whether any particular thing is an instance of it.

Furthermore, it mentions key elements of historical fascism – anti-communism, anti-conservatism, and anti-liberalism – whose presence in Putin's Russia is debatable. Putin has criticised communism, but he tends to go for nuanced and qualified criticism rather than the demonisation of it which was historically found in Mussolini's Italy, Hitler's Germany or Franco's Spain. He isn't anti-conservative either. Nor is he rhetorically opposed to parliamentary liberalism – he is accused of undermining the substance of it, but he pays it lip service, unlike Mussolini and Hitler who demonised it.

The first actual definition it gives in the "Definition" section is this:

> Historian Stanley G. Payne's definition is frequently cited as standard by notable scholars,[31] such as Roger Griffin,[32] Randall Schweller,[33] Bo Rothstein,[34] Federico Finchelstein,[35] and Stephen D. Shenfield,[36] [37] His definition of fascism focuses on three concepts:

And the first of those three concepts is:

> "Fascist negations" – anti-liberalism, anti-communism, and anti-conservatism.

I say Putin lacks all three – he isn't anti-liberal (you can say he is in a contemporary sense, but not in the historical sense that Mussolini was, which is I believe the sense Payne means), he isn't anti-communist (again, not in the sense Mussolini/etc were), and he isn't anti-conservative.
o1-preview.
I never really understood why not simply use milliseconds since the epoch and keep track of a time zone separately if needed... This allows fairly easy conversion to most native systems i have worked with, easy sorting and diff operations as well as final display control. Also don't have a need to be thinking about daylight savings then, or do other conversions for say timesheets.
that's sad (I don't mean that in a mean way)

yeah, there are times when I've felt like that, but they're pretty fleeting

at what age did you start a family? I think one of the reasons people should start a family a bit later (early thirties maybe) is so that they have the opportunity to experience/enjoy those things without kids (and not have to wait until the kids are all grown up and then they're in their 50s and it's just not the same as the stuff you can do in your 20s).
Ask HN: Any small electronics/hardware manufacturers need a custom PLM?
I'm looking at building a custom solution for a manufacturer in familiar with. Their current processes are "on paper" but digital. IE, share drives and PDFs. Documentation is scattered, old stuff is a mystery (unless you know where to look on the share drives), and most pressing to me is the bills of materials for end item products are split across three different sources of truth; one for engineering, one for production, and one for purchasing. Second on my list is locating documentation and files associated with a particular part number.

What I'm curious about is your pain points at small manufacturing companies. Have you faced similar issues? What solutions did you land on? What worked? What didn't work?

Would you find a somewhat opinionated but configurable PLM with a basic feature set useful? On-prem (for cmmc and security requirements)?
> allowed criticism of Israel to go viral

Typically the things that get deplatformed are not well-reasoned criticism so much as emotional outbursts full of barely coherent rhetoric anyway... (this comment should not be interpreted as taking a position on the issue).
Because they think they are smarter than everyone else. Everyone knows it's a scam, that's why it's a meme. No one believes they will be the one holding the bag when the music stops.
> The parents I've seen seem to spend every waking second doting on their children for at least a decade, which seems strange to me. This hovering "what can I do to satisfy your desires" literally just constantly (I've also seen people doing this with their dogs)

parenting doesn't have to be like this for the kids to be happy; in fact, it's probably counter-productive in many cases

I have also seen this and in many cases it's pressure for the kids to succeed. Back in the 70s and early 80s you literally just had to not fall off the wagon, and could get a job and be okay. Wanted to go to Stanford, or become a doctor? Sure it would take some work, but completely doable. Want your kid to go to Stanford now if they like? You have to put your kid through a horribly stressful regime that starts in preschool, and even then it's going to be a lottery. Granted you don't need to go to Stanford to be happy but my point being that you want your kids to have opportunities, and getting those opportunities is SO FUCKING HARDER than it was for you as the parent when you were young (and way way harder than your own parents). And so you have to optimize for it, and the earlier you start, the better your chances. It's crushing for the parents and the kids. And the more successful the parents were, the more pressure to give their kids the same opportunities they had.
I'd like to see a similar write-up for dark mode. It took 20 years and it still says "beta" even though its basically switching a CSS template. Its a pattern I've seen over many different websites, so there must be a common reason.
I think these memecoins are basically just gambling. People hop onto short lived hype trains in the hope of cashing out before they collapse.
> But to the US government (and its codependent allies), losing grip of the influence the US secured over the Pacific rim of Asia during to the 20th century and yielding it to China is an embarrassment at best and a major strategic loss at worst, and sets the stage for some kind of active contest of power which would be really costly and painful.

Do you have more sources/readings on this? It's not that I don't believe you, it's just the first rationale I've heard that doesn't boil down to vague innuendos about manipulation and national security that are equally applicable to US companies.
So I'm obviously not privy to internal Anthem discussions but I'll speculate on what happened there based on industry trends. There has been a huge increase in anesthesia costs over the past several years and I suspect that Anthem's self-funded employer customers are pushing Anthem to find ways to cut those expenses. Most anesthesiologists work in private practices rather than as employees of hospitals or surgery centers. Private equity firms have been buying up those practices and establishing effective monopolies in some regions, then jacking their rates up. Anthem handled the messaging around this issue horribly but I kind of understand why they tried to impose some limits. It's not like patients would be denied necessary care or anesthesiologists wouldn't be paid, the insurance would just cap the maximum charges for certain procedures.

https://www.beckersasc.com/anesthesia/private-equity-has-a-g...

Ultimately only a small percentage of the total money in the healthcare system goes to payer (insurance company) profits. Much larger portions flow to providers, pharmaceutical companies, and device manufacturers. So as far as reforming the system we can maybe get a little savings by squeezing insurers but it's not going to solve any of the fundamental problems.
It’s eerie, right? Feeling like the only sane person in the room in crypto discussions.
But if it’s all Fs, that means you have the sign bit set, so it’s not the largest.

It’s the smallest that’s less than zero right?
If you have significant financial interest in a product or service you're not going to bring on someone who will meaningfully oppose that product or service. Therefore anyone who goes onto that podcast, or whatever media, would be selected for.
Not monero. It is the only useful cryptocurrency in my opinion, and it is easy to understand that it is private digital cash.
I don't agree with the article's assertion that the gunman was camera savvy. While he wore a hood which meant a video feed in a nearby Starbucks only got a partial image of his face, adding a baseball cap and horn-rimmed glasses would have easily obscured even more from both cameras and nearby witnesses, with no apparent downsides. More obviously, going into a nearby Starbucks shortly before committing the crime and engaging directly with the worker at the counter so much she specifically remembers the conversation was extremely reckless and seemingly unnecessary.

Like most criminals, this man was neither smart nor disciplined and that will, fortunately, probably lead to his capture.
You’ve made the classic error: assuming that anyone who tries to become president is acting in good faith.

A well funded bad faith candidate will ALWAYS beat any good faith candidate.

Why? You can tell everyone you’ll do exactly what they want you to do.

Muslims: I’ll stop the violence in Gaza instantly, I support a ceasefire. The other guy wants to kill all Palestinians.

Jews: I will support Israel unconditionally. The other guy wants Israel wiped off the map.

And people make the mistake you are: well, he’s running for president. He CANNOT possibly be that corrupt.

And they will vote, in droves, for the demagogue.

That’s why that word exists.
And Burmese / Myanmarians.

Names are always bestowed, never picked.
This works when "game recognizes game". But when you have HR or shitty developers doing the interview it doesn't.
You’re flatly wrong, and so is vkou. From the text of the 1st amendment: “Congress shall make no law […] abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…” (cut the establishment clause for clarity).

It doesn’t say “congress shall make no law for citizens” or “within the US”.
From a European to many Americans here who feel the need to chime in with their ideas of what exactly democracy should be (when clearly, America itself doesn’t have a clear clue what democracy actually is):

Europe is a continent at war. We are being attacked both physically on our eastern front, and online in all countries. Russia is exploiting weaknesses in our systems and employing state sponsored propaganda to install pro-Russian sentiment through means that our own laws have trouble catching.

It’s not about whether it’s 1 million euros vs. 360k vs 100 million. It’s about where this money is coming from. Who is using it, and exactly WHY they are doing so. The other candidates may or may not be shit, it’s irrelevant, if a country that is attacking one of ours is putting its defence spending to use in OUR ELECTIONS.

Kindly, ask yourself whether you are REALLY qualified to comment on who we should accept as the next people running countries that aren’t yours, and deciding fates an ocean away from you.

I notice similar sentiment from the US around election time. “What does Europe have to say about who we elect?” — well, quite a bit considering your president decides a lot of our fates. But EU leaders have far less individual influence over yours.

So, take a step back, and don’t tell our people at war not to fight back.

This is the new reality y’all ain’t woken up to yet. It’s not just Ukraine anymore. In fact it never was. I say this, having lost people there myself.
Is this the same link preview that Eliezer Yudkowsky claimed to have invented first on the Lex Fridman podcast?
RollerCoaster Tycoon was the last of its kind [video]
I already live with that one, don't need another.
A person was trying to save his money, which mostly sat in banks in a country which got in a financial turmoil. No external wires were possible. He bought cryptocurrency which sold in another country and put the other currency in a bank in the save haven. He got substantial losses, around 10%, but there was a serious risk was to lose all.

Just as an illustration of a use which - for good or bad - reached the goals of the person.
This is not fraud. Voting fraud is when you manipulate ballots. It's amazing how well intentioned people here tend to believe that voters are influenced toddlers who can't be trusted. Why even have elections?
I had ChatGPT summarize this paper for me.

It's pretty impressive to me that a single post doc has this much breadth in a single paper.

Convex Geometry

- Brunn-Minkowski theory
- Surface Area Measure

Measure Theory

- Lebesgue–Stieltjes Measure
- Green’s Theorem

Differential Geometry

- Weak derivatives for boundaries
- Trajectories and rotation paths

Optimization and Functional Analysis

- Quadratic functionals
- Concavity and global optimization

Combinatorial Geometry

- Balanced polygons
- Iterative approximation and discretization

Computational Geometry

- Numerical simulations
- Verification of bounds and injectivity

Advanced Theorems

- Mamikon’s Theorem
- Jordan Curve Theorem
Again, you are missing the point, which may be a product of your environment. It’s not about systemic differences, or who is doing rule of law “properly”.

One side is pointing at knobs with the word China crossed out and replaced with USA.

The other side is shocked that someone would make such knobs in the first place, regardless of their label.

The issue is not the shape of the knob, or the color, or its size. The issue is the knobs existence.
How said? Tiny violin sad. The typical consumer which likely is 99% of them is not going to use this
I hope they'll come out with other color enclosures. Remarkably ugly blue IMO.
Just because aliexpress is full of bad products doesn't make a good product bought on aliexpress bad.
I just did though - got lots of results about the massacre. Not sure what you’re alluding to.
You can do it with negative margins too, https://codepen.io/webstrand/pen/OPLLBZN
Reminds me that picture of a priest, who'd preach to his people, "machines can't think! machines should drive!" . I suspect he was also feeling like the only sane person in the room...
Technically feasible? yes.
But why would the intelligence/military blob do things this way?

Haven't they proved over and over that they will use any opportunity to spy on as much people as possible?
I've been out for about two years. My retirement is a bullet or poison. It's just that simple. I will never earn FAANG money such that I can make up for the lost time.
> incentive for operational gas pumps

It seems gas stations get 70% of the profits from the conveience stores.

EV charging stations are pretty standalone. They could probably do the mcdonalds thing - become real-estate companies. Leasing surrounding land to convenience stores could be a good model.
Hype about the PoE, that's an absolutely killer feature that should be mandatory in basically every networking/home automation doodad.
That's an Ampere A6000, one generation older than the Ada A6000. Nvidia decided that confusing model names are a good way to sell old products at a premium.
Horrible feature.
If only it could run office 365.
Already out of stock at aliexpress, is there any other place to buy it?

BTW really love the industrial design look. Very retro, although I can see some people being turned off due to it. I am assuming it is metal case.
Map shows 'true' size of Africa – China, India and America fit inside
I was going to "see also also" you with https://libraryofbabel.info/ but RIP for it is dead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Library_of_Babel_(website)