skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And this isn't new: it was true for gems with Ruby, it was true for pear with PHP, it was true for CPAN with perl. I don't do javascript at all but I assume it's doubly true for npm just because that place seems to make even pypi look conservative and glacial. I've mostly come around to the belief that if an piece of software has a package manager you should just use it instead of your system package manager. But man do I miss the days of CPAN packages that might update once a year.
Probably unapproved third-party merch, like those bumper stickers where Calvin is pissing on something. Watterson is famous for having always been anti-merchandising.
> I’d like to see more evidence that it’s a scam

Have you been introduced to their CEO yet? 5 minutes of Worldcoin research should assuage your curiosity.
"screw it, lets compile it into a WASM blob that renders it all on a canvas"
That's only true if your time is metered by the hour; and the vast majority of roles which find some benefit from AI, at this time, are not compensated hourly. This plan might be beneficial to e.g. CEO-types, but I question who at OpenAI thought it would be a good idea to lead their 12 days of hollowhype with this launch, then; unless this is the highest impact release they've got (one hopes it is not).
That makes a lot more sense thanks.

Yeah I don't see a reason that just because the DOJ is a part of a legal deal ... somehow their department policies should be injected. Could have some very negative outcomes and strangeness about what kind of deal DOJ can even make if a department policy gets injected that counteracts something in the deal.
Inflation generally encourages economic activity (spend your money before it depreciates) while deflation discourages it (save your money because it will appreciate)

Lower prices are seen as positive for as long as they stimulate higher overall consumption. If prices fall but consumption does not rise, then most economists see that as a problem.
There's a timestamp in the top right, so yes. Looks like no tsunami
> 25 prompts

Interested to learn more, is that the usual break even point?
https://nixle.us/FZ3E9
Millions of people are hooked up to a terminal as well.
Surprised no one has built a dynamodb compatible api yet. Wouldn’t be that difficult. Dynamodb actually has similar constraints already
Technology Language Models Research
With an interactive LLM you can take a manual and start asking questions (about what you read), also recursively.

It is a very efficient way of studying. No, doing it with a professor is not the same - unless you can afford an always available tutor of unthinkable erudition.
It is not linear on number or prints. 1 vs 2 prints will likely have zero noticeable affect.
It's neat that you can simply file paperwork and suddenly stealing wages from employees or negligent homicide of customers (and child labor employees) becomes a civil matter. Not a personal civil matter, of course.

Also sometimes you can shuffle all the profits to a different set of paperwork and have the old paperwork vanish along with its consequences. Very neat system.
A Mind-Blowing Leap
IMO the subsidies are a small part of Intel's turnaround. The company needs to become fundamentally viable regardless of subsidies.
If a model is good enough (I’m not saying this one is that level) I could imagine individuals and businesses paying 20,000 a month. If they’re answering questions at phd level (again, not saying this one is) then for a lot of areas this makes sense
> The problem was nobody was connecting the cost cutting to outcomes.

If so, that sounds like (reckless) criminal negligence in the most charitable case and wilful disregard bordering malice in the worst case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_negligence
Think of it as an intern. Don't trust everything they say.
> I feel sorry though for someone getting into frontend dev now.

I most certainly don’t.

As someone who has mostly done low level coding and used to generally dislike my few interactions with web frontend development, I was extremely surprised when I picked up React a few years ago for a personal project.

The whole thing feels like actual proper development. What a breath of fresh air compared to the situation before.
i think they monitor pressure waves somehow

here is an interactive map, looks like some of them are picking up something
https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/obs.shtml?lat=13&lon=-173&zoom=2&p...
Sure, although I think there's room for reasonable people to disagree where to draw the line for various services. But taxi service? Seems way way out there in terms of costs and of minimal benefit.
Based on the location and focal mechanism of the earthquake (https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/nc75095651...), this is a strike-slip earthquake on the plate boundary between the Pacific and Gorda/Juan de Fuca plates. Strike-slip earthquakes occur when two plates slide beside each other during an earthquake, usually along a steeply-dipping if not vertical fault. These kinds of earthquakes almost never produce damaging (or even really noticeable) tsunamis because there is no real displacement of sea water by seafloor movement, unlike a thrust or subduction zone earthquake.

The USGS's automated systems calculate the location and focal mechanism/moment tensor pretty much instantly from the seismic network. The system should know that a significant tsunami is unlikely based on the parameters of the earthquake. On the one hand, it's good to be cautious, but on the other hand, a system designed to cry wolf is also self-undermining. Maybe they should have a tiered warning system?
From https://www.tsunami.gov/events/PHEB/2024/12/05/24340001/2/WE...

TSUNAMI THREAT FORECAST...UPDATED
---------------------------------

* THERE IS NO LONGER A TSUNAMI THREAT FROM THIS EARTHQUAKE.
The warning went at least as far as the inland side of Fremont, which seemed extreme.
There is now an updated notice timestamped at 11:24 Pacific time:

https://www.tsunami.gov/events/PAAQ/2024/12/05/so1aq0/2/WEAK...

which (still) says:

* No tsunami observations are available to report.

And another one at: https://www.tsunami.gov/events/PHEB/2024/12/05/24340001/2/WE...

intended for a worldwide audience which says:

* THERE IS NO LONGER A TSUNAMI THREAT FROM THIS EARTHQUAKE.
Great visualization but lost me at the end when it got a bit too preachy. Turning socioeconomic issues into race issues doesn't help anyone.
To be fair, "fun" is also a full word in English. Also, it's just plain fun.
Emscripten's user agent (browser) Javascript is quite cryptic and was rather difficult to adapt Emscripten-compiled WASM to custom web apps. (Had to look at Emscripten example web app.) Congrats.
Most people are safer than average most of the time. Risk is a heavily bimodal. The issue is that people keep driving even when it's risky. Maybe they have to get to work even though they didn't sleep much, or they need to get home from the bar, or they're road raging, or they don't have someone with them to drive instead.
Yes, it's entirely possible that they're scrambling to make money. That doesn't actually increase the value that they're offering though.
I think that is a valid argument and makes some sense. have to toss the hot potato. The argument for the trade offs are pretty simple I think. It encourages more concentration of wealth in assets and increases the amount of malinvestment.

The question is to what degree. I am saying there's no analytical argument for 2%.

I think most people would agree that 10% or 50% inflation would be bad. But why is 2% better than 1% or 0%?. Why is 1% better than -1%? it depends on the time horizon. higher inflation today will cause more economic activity, higher inflation in the long run encourages debt and misallocation of resources.
Naval GUN Fire Control System software is written in C++, says job listing
Not sure how to interpret what you're saying.

HTMX allows you to learn the very basics: the HTML which is almost verbatim turned into DOM which the browser renders. It's the FE. Everything else is layers upon layers of abstraction which ultimately compile down to the DOM representation of HTML.

...or to put it differently, quoting HTMX's author: using HTTP to transfer HTML? How queer!
Always has been. Most ARM cores are closer to x86 E-cores.
Even in this case loosing $200 + whatever vs a tiny bit higher chance of loosing $20 + whatever makes pro seem a good deal.
> children would love their own stuffed Hobbes

In lieu of Hobbes™, sellers offer many choices.

https://www.amazon.com/hobbes-stuffed-tiger/s?k=hobbes+stuff...
Just use the Filesystem MCP Server, and give it access to the repo you're working on:

https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/servers/tree/main/sr...

This way you will still be in control of commits and pushes.

So far I've used this to understand parts of a code base, and to make edits to a folder of markdown files.
Ask HN: What's the best way to build multi agent PoCs today
1. Has anyone recently compared the various OSS multi agent frameworks and have strong opinions on what to start with and why? I have a preference for code based, but a UI to visualize would be nice.
- Phitdata
- AgentChat 0.4(RC)
- Crew
- Other?

2. In general, what is the most "batteries included" way to work with agents? My goal is to reduce time spent integrating tools (logging, monitoring, evaluation, security, etc) while I build PoCs. My current approach is LiteLLM + LangFuse, but would love to head about something better.
Bugs are simply not comparable to losing 2 aircrafts and killing hundreds of people, furthermore FAANG engineers have little impact on the org individually. But we already have that kind of threats for malpractice in several fields, if an engineer or doctor makes a mistake resulting in injuries or death they will be held responsible financially and sometimes criminally.
I make a circuit that waits a random interval and then sends a pulse down the line. I connect it to a relay that launches a missile. I diligently connect that to a computer and then write a prompt telling how the AI agent can invoke the pulse on that circuit.

How did this happen? AI escaped and launched a missile. I didn't do this, it was the AI.

OpenAI is so cringe with these system cards. Look guys it is so advanced.
Well I didn't see a Tsunami but thanks to this thread I do have a few nice live streams of pleasant water views going. Kind of relaxing tbh.
No, you can use core scheduling to assign both threads to the same tenant.
The number of times I've heard all this about some other groundbreaking technology... most businesses just went meh and moved on. But for self-employed, if those numbers are right, it may make sense.
I would have to agree beforehand that the share is worth $2, or else I wouldn't have bought it from you at that price. Somehow the share was already $2 before you sold it to me, but you got it for $1, how come? Your example is nonsensical.
Interesting that the reader is ranked in 2D space on dimensions for which the reader provided a single bit of data ("Able to pause work"). I wonder how those dimensions are inferred.
25 prompts is the daily limit on o1-preview. And I wrote that script in just one day.
I just seen two people walk by... seems like a bit of a gamble to do that.
Point taken, although I feel like $2k a year would be really cheap if AI delivered on its hype.
Let me know when the models are actually, verifiably, this good. They're barely good enough to replace interns at this point.
Great looking GUI, I find simple black/white/boxy/monospace UIs very effective.
LTE ETWS/PWS is mandatory feature, iPhones has the same thing. Maybe you've explicitly disabled it, considering (IIUC) US used it for AMBER alerts and had annoyed lots of people at some point.

Generally an earthquake warnings are issued by someone always automatically correlating sensors everywhere, USGS and/or NOAA in case with US, and then cellular carriers broadcasting the alert through LTE feature. This does not work without participating local equivalent of USGS deploying a sensor network and running its computers wired to carriers.

This feature is carrier agnostic, enabled by default, and mandatory on phones; it's specifically designed to deliver earthquake early warnings. It does not matter if it's Android, iOS, or something else altogether. Any phones, SIM locked or unlocked, with or without SIM, should start blaring the alert so long it hears the signal.

ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_Broadcast
>Shareholders couldn't care less if someone fucks up the house. Most corporate shares in the US are held by retirement and pension funds. Those funds are run by people who are paid to make sure that they can divest from a position relatively quickly and with minimal loss in value. Many of them diversify their holdings and are perfectly fine with someone screwing the company so long as it bumps the number at quarter's end. Jack Welch is an excellent example of this.

Activist investors and private equity are a counter to this. If it's really true that companies are ineptly run that all it takes is for someone who cares to turn it around, it should be easy to make a bunch of money by buying a company, exercising the tiniest of shareholder pressure over management, and then selling it after the company's turned around. Moreover, this strategy working would mean it's possible to get above average returns, which all institutional investors would be interested in. The board of Harvard isn't going to be very happy with their investment manager if Stanford is getting 1.5x returns by exercising good corporate governance. That's not to say corporate governance is prefect for all companies. The fact that activist investors exist at all suggests some companies at least are performing below average, but the claim that "Shareholders couldn't care less if someone fucks up the house" is delusional.

>For further evidence, see how the market reacted to the murder of United Healthcare's CEO yesterday. The stock barely moved when the news broke and is still up for the month as of about half-an-hour ago. That's not the behavior of a market that sees the CEO as a watchful guardian of assets and a risk-bearer of corporate decisions; it's the behavior of a market that sees everyone as utterly disposable.

counterpoint: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-13/new-starb...
Better than FORTRAN II...well, probably.
Takes about 300 years to find out.
As harsh as this sounds, it also seems to have other benefits. Often when things go wrong the solution the government comes up with is "micromanage the industry more", and the industry becomes yet more bureaucratic and compliance focused. Innovation is harder because the people making the rules aren't necessarily the domain experts.

I think an accountability approach lets engineers build for safety leveraging their expert knowledge, in contrast to a rule based approach which favors compliance and bureaucracy. Accountability will select for leaders with an understanding of good engineering and safety culture, rather than leaders who are good at bureaucracy and compliance.

I worked in the financial sector for a bit, where some leaders have personal accountability (eg chief compliance officer). I've seen questionable projects die because the company couldn't find someone to stay in that accountability role. The financial sector is not necessarily a good example of what I'm talking about generally, but in my particular experiences accountability seemed to work.

tl;dr: Fewer rules, more personal accountability.
Can you share a clear example? This still seems like a contrived complaint. How did someone fat finger typing that specific naming requirement prefix?
Or how is leaking a value into a template like that not similarly a risk in Python or a Go backend that renders stuff on the server (like all the HTMX hype). It feels like you're saying that a fat client side SPA is the only answer to anything.
You are right - "Hallucinations are not a bug"
Perhaps I'm wrong about how Matrix works, but my understanding was that at least public rooms still had a "primary" homeserver, like for example I can connect to #debian:matrix.org from any number of federated servers but matrix.org is still where that room "lives".

If that understanding is correct, then IMO the answer is simply that the canonical timeline is what that server says it is. Poorly connected users or those on other servers experiencing issues or delays with federation may temporarily see a different sequence of events but once everyone's had a chance to sync back up the state should generally be what the primary server for the room saw it as.

Perhaps there should be some sort of flag for "this message has been reordered during a resync" that clients which initially had a different state due to whatever reason could store to make it clear what happened, and likewise if the central homeserver receives messages with a timestamp significantly off real time it could flag those messages as possibly having been received out of order while still displaying them in the order they were received.
I’m not even convinced the intent is there though. An ai parroting terminator 2 lines is just that. Obviously no one should hook the ai up to nuclear launch systems but that’s like saying no one should give a parrot a button to launch nukes. The parrot repeating curse words isn’t the problem here.
One of the best parts of this release:

ref as a prop: Refs can now be used as props, removing the need for forwardRef.
Easy - don't trust the answers. Verify them
Still very much "open-source": https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroach

But relicensed to the "CockroachDB Software License" as a form of BSL to prevent reselling.
I liked redux, but its vocabulary was the last thing core React should have adopted from it.
Or what goes well with milk.
I don't think this is a helpful tone.

Do they think it's _actually_ a real script deactivating oversight? Well, no, you know that. I can only assume it's a rhetorical device.

Simultaneously, these things are given access to actual things and will be more and more. It's important to measure and observe these things. It's completely novel to have an AI, with a hidden trace the user can't see, and it turns out that hidden trace will include things like it actively deceiving and doing things it was told not to do.
$200/month seems to be psychological pricing to imply superior quality. In a blind test, most would be hard-pressed to distinguish the results from other LLMs. For those that think $200/month is a good deal, why not $500/mo or $1000/mo?
Did not read the article, but my lay perspective is that the chemicals will degrade over time into different molecules due to particle radiation from neutrinos and the like. Just given enough time, the original product no longer has any potent chemical effect.
When you put it this way, I think I need to finally buy that espresso machine.
I'm in a low-cost country, haha! So the intern is even cheaper.
> Plus, I used about $62 worth of API credits in their not-so-great Playground.

what is not so great about it? what have you seen that is better?
? You can serve a public app that is just static files that uses React in some places. It's no different from using JQuery.
First HN submission I could find mentioning the price: 30 Apr 2011 "Bitcoin hits US$ 4, after being mentioned on CNN yesterday" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2501006

One of the comments "I've been watching the price of BTC rise pretty steadily in the last few days but I can't bring myself to believe that this price range is in any way sustainable. $4 per bitcoin? ..."
The Pro mode is slower actually.

They even made a way to notify you when it's finished thinking.
3. Warn others to not buy .to domains if this shit occurs
The US is the last place standing that doesn't look at all innovators & leaders as robber barons. Some are, sure.

But if you want economic growth, someone needs to take risk. Capital formation, investment, founding companies. This is what leads to hiring and jobs.

Look at ossified cultures in EU, UK, and even Japan where stringent hiring/firing laws, shrinking populations and dire economic growth mean it's great to already be 40/50+ years old protected worker. Unfortunately it also means youth can't find jobs, and where they can they are under more tenuous contractual agreements than their older cohort has. Plus an increasing share of the taxes the youth pay will be to fund the generous retirement of their elders who outnumber them.

And again before some US Doomers chime in, take a global perspective. Go look up some rich world unemployment stats. The US right now has some of the lowest unemployment both historically and when compared against all the current global rates.
Karma 6. Draw your own conclusions ladies and gentlemen
https://youtu.be/i0rL0ukZmf0

https://www.flags.com/blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about...

>> While some people believe that the fringe has symbolic meaning, its primary purpose is ornamental, giving the flag an air of distinction and honor. Fringed flags are usually displayed on indoor flagpoles, though they may also be used in parades or during other ceremonial presentations. It’s important to note that these flags are not typically flown outside, as the fringe is not designed to withstand outdoor weather conditions.

In short: people get confused because they only see the fringe on special occasions or indoors as in courtrooms. It has no meaning.
It's a narrow view of justice that equates it to well aimed violence.
I was watching the crescent city webcam and watched the fishing boats rushing out of the harbor after the quake. The webcam is now down, so I hope they made it.

Crescent city has a long history of being devastated by norcal quakes due the the bathymetry and costline profile.
I'm not familiar, what did Berkshire do?
target market is probably people who will write it off as a business expense
Compared to know things and not loosing whatever, both are pretty bad deals.
You probably need to be more clear: the LLM is trained with large amounts of data making statements about facts. It is told repeatedly, "according to this source that crayon is blue".
Please, before we discuss this further, and I would like to, provide some idea of what would qualify as an "actual effort into AGI" for you.
> After awhile, I started realizing that these mistakes are present in almost all topics.

A fun question I tried a couple of times is asking it to give me a list with famous talks about a topic. Or a list of famous software engineers and the topics they work on.

A couple of names typically exist but many names and basically all talks are shamelessly made up.