skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Remote: open to remote

Willing to relocate: would consider Boulder, Co.

Technologies: everything iOS/tvOS related. swift, SwiftUI, ObjC, Combine etc. Built dozens of apps. One of them became a unicorn company. Managed cross functional teams across multiple platforms (iOS/tvOS, Android, Roku, Web).

Résumé/CV: https://appuchino.notion.site/Alexey-Rashevskiy-b936f56ba476...

Email: rashevsky@gmail.com

20+ years in software development. 12+ years of management experience. 14 years of iOS experience.
Looking for an Engineering Leadership (manager/director) in mobile/smart tv area. Preferably hands-on role.
I'll have to check it out! The popular option for homelab or other indie scale is to just use the cloudflare's free-tier setup, which includes WAF, but I see a privacy hole where cloudflare needs to see your unencrypted HTTP traffic so that they can apply their WAF rules.

I've also been checking out CrowdSec. I appreciate it's modular architecture but it definitely deviates away from the folks that just wants to expose an HTTP service and get on with their lives. I've enjoyed the Caddy server for this reason, but yeah, not as secure-as-default when it comes to attacks a WAF would mitigate.
Premade ways of escaping the bounds of a browser viewport with styling like a system dialog box certainly sounds like something a developer would want rather than users or browser makers. It's not an accidental disappointment new things aren't made to function like alert() and friends used to, it also has upsides (beyond just "the old interface was not promise based".

I do agree <dialog> could have done with at least a little bit of TLC on the styling though, I just don't think it has to be 100% look and function like a system dialog outside the DOM to do it. Some base default styling to match the rest of the browser's default style would do wonders.

For PWAs (or any "web apps with more permissions than a random page should get just for being loaded") I could see where you wanted <dialogs> to go as a more well received idea though, similar to how there are separate things for styling the windows and interacting with the system for those more privileged pages.
"In 2021, the 21-page Corporate Transparency Act was tucked into a sweeping 1,482-page defense bill passed by Congress over President Donald Trump’s veto."

How?
> a bunch of people are going to be motivated to hack the election to get it "annulled" in some way.

There will be trials for this, and both the people who bought the ads (if they can be found), but more importantly the media publishers who pocketed the millions will have to answer questions to prove this was legal.

You can't unilaterally "pump some millions" to buy some electoral ads. Someone pocketed some millions and will need to show receipts.
Parkchester – The Bronx: Last Stop on the Orphan Train
You’re missing the forest for the trees. You claim “they have no men left”. This is false, and reduces trust in everything else you say. You might be right about your main point, but the argument you provide is not convincing.

As one datapoint I’d love to hear a convincing argument, and really don’t have a strong opinion on who will win. If you make a more trustworthy argument for why Ukraine will lose, I promise I’ll read it

Edit: truthfully, this is the most convincing argument I’ve seen so far https://manifold.markets/chrisjbillington/will-ukraine-win-t...
A Citi Bike was killed?
How are they supposed to use them?
seems like we're ok crossing the line of "some people need killing," we just have rules on who's allowed to do it and the paperwork needed.
> I would recommend not responding and, if necessary, simply refer them to our own media organization.

> I provided their communications department with an opportunity to tell their side of the story, is that they simply didn’t respond

They have nothing to say in their defense. That says a lot.
Ironically, their denial of insurance is also aggressive, inappropriate and disrespectful. It’s unbelievable how tone deaf these people are. Instead of being introspective, other insurance companies are simply removing leadership pages, and calling for armed guards.
Most retouching techniques used in modern digital photography were also practiced in darkrooms.

For a famous example of this, take Ansel Adam's Moonrise over Hernandez. A straight contact print looks like this: https://i0.wp.com/www.haroldhallphotography.com/wp-content/u...

The final image looks like this: https://i0.wp.com/www.haroldhallphotography.com/wp-content/u...

https://www.haroldhallphotography.com/ansel-adams-and-group-...
Yeah, v11 has been released recently.

Totally agree about ONNX, without it I wouldn't probably even started making this library. However, something I want to try is to code the network with Nx/Axon, without using onnx. The main advantage I see moving from onnx to Axon is to take advantage of all the new cool stuff like Nx sharding: https://dockyard.com/blog/2024/11/06/2024/nx-sharding-update...
Okay, so where is the proof he asked for the help?
np, I'm taking deadbeef-beef-4000-beef-deadbeefdead
The funny thing is that I can't tell what side you're supporting from your statements.

I agree the west has lost its morality.

I disagree the average person is seeing reality with their own eyes. The average person is seeing whatever some interested party wants to frame as reality.

That's why Russians support Putin. In their reality they are fighting Nazis in Ukraine and protecting the rights of ethnic Russians. And there is some stream of social media you can be on where that is reality.

What you have right now is that state actors and money shapes reality. Do you want China to say what reality is or do you want democracies in the west to say what reality is and specifically the US.

With all the problems, I prefer to have the Americans be the source of truth if I have to pick between them, Russia and China.

I reject the framing around "elites" shaping reality. While we've always had issues around this the western democratic way is the best we know, with all its issues. Moving this power to China and Meta is making things worse.
i am myself Eastern European too, I'm Polish :<
Hands are typically an excellent gray reference for photography, ensuring that the captured photos represent the color accurately given the photographer’s platform constraints. Hands also help the human brain correct for variations in lighting, color profiles, monitor calibration, and so on. Showing the dye color on skin ensures the highest fidelity conveyance of the hue to the reader possible without control over how it’s viewed. Other examples of the pigment’s use would be abstract and “just another blue”; by showing in this way, it’s possible to see that it’s an uncommon and high-key blue.

It’s also extremely unusual to see a skin-safe saturated dye in this shade; most powdered sources of blue and white, which would necessarily be blended to reach these shade, would be highly toxic. So, for pigment historians and aficionados, these photographs are eerie and compelling. This is what working with pigment used to be like, before we understood how much of it was toxic and deadly to the people working with and wearing it. You could just dip your hands in the forbidden color and admire them. It’s very cool to see and I’m glad they used hands as the focus.

(There may also be cultural reasons why the dye is shown here on skin; I haven’t yet studied mesoamerican cultures and body painting, but others who are more familiar should chime in.)
Have you ever taken an MBA course? It's so weird for you to refer to "MBA-style corporations" considering that "The Innovator's Dilemma" by Clayton M. Christensen has literally been a core text in most MBA programs for decades. If anything, Intel has become an anti MBA-style corporation.

https://hbsp.harvard.edu/product/10706-PDF-ENG
You've just discovered why people want to collect as much data and throw supposedly neutral algorithms like AI at it to find patterns.

Problem is, the selection of which information to put into the model is biased.

Like, why is religion even in there in the first place? What counts as a religion? Is "Christian" a category? Which makes a religion Christian? Can an atheist also be a Christian? ("Two per cent of Anglican priests don't believe in God, survey finds", https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/survey-finds... )

Does "college degree" distinguish between accredited and non-accredited colleges? If yes, from which accrediting organizations? If no, then from every diploma mill? For that matter, do honorary degrees count?

Once we've seen the correlation that terrorists are significantly more likely to be engineers (https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=why+are+terrorists+engineer... ) ... what next?

As to "who truly need help", we can look to how standardized tests are used to identify schools which aren't doing well. So, do we help them? Or sanction them and even shut them down? That's a political discussion, not one left to AI.
So the next step for russia is to invest some tiktok money for the the person that would be elected anyways but they hate the most, and this way discredit that person?
The two ruling parties that are governing in a coalition right now aren't known for either competence or honesty either.

Incidentally, their presidential candidates did not make it to the second round of elections.

So one can legitimately ask if this is because of the russian interference, or because they want another chance at the presidency?
The analogy to Rome is inapt.

We're highly dependent on external capital, technologies, materials, and resources -- not to mention goodwill enabling trade and avoiding social chaos. All of these can and do change in a matter of months, and the speed of the collapse can be amplified by smart individuals making self-interested decisions, and even more by bad actors working in concert for strategic reasons.
> Google DeepMind predicts weather more accurately than leading system

"Ethics declarations
Competing interests
I.P., A.S.-G., F.A., T.R.A., A.E.K., D.M., T.E., J.S., S.M., P.B., R.L. and M.W. are employees of Alphabet and own Alphabet stock. Provisional patent 63/614,461 was filed covering the algorithm described in this paper, listing the authors I.P., M.W., A.S.-G., F.A., R.L. and P.B. as inventors. The authors declare no other competing interests related to the paper."

Conflict of interests ? /s
This only contains V4 UUIDs. Disappointed.
I think focusing on the salary number misses the forest for the trees. The specific number isn’t the point.

“Everyone has a price” or something.
less overall commute time, yeah, but it means your day might be literally nothing but work and sleep.

probably not long-term sustainable.
How do we know for certain (certain) that Search is not a product? After all, hasn't Google made billions off of it? If it's not a product, then is it a feature? What is it a feature of? If neither product nor feature, what is it?
Love that article, and this thread. Very new to the world of games, and this sort of area (and MUDs, generally, too, I suppose) seems so ripe for further exploration. What an exquisite world
It's crazy that insurance companies are (rightfully) viewed so negatively that the killing of a CEO is responded to positively in a lot of circles. No doubt the jokes on twitter have been great, and it is a good release like I've heard people say about breaking a window with a brick during a protest. It (edit: represents) a lot more than just property damage. It's unlikely but maybe some good will come of this from insurance companies.
List is toi short. I’d add: Posture.

Everyone wants to be the benevolent manager, especially if there is enough money for everyone, and especially in these times where collaboration and positive management are touted. But you have to keep a carrot and a leash on the employees.

My first employees got a 33% raise the first year things were good. Long story short: None of them are here anymore and we’re still scrambling to recover from the mess they’ve created by being lazy.

Now people struggle to get a few percent salary increase. It eats me to my core, but I want them to get my product out.
And even in Tokyo it only applies to metropolitan (roughly, state) workers, not the ward (roughly, city) governments.

According to the data below, there's anywhere from 33k to 161k metropolitan employees depending on where you draw the line.

https://www.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/tosei/hodohappyo/press/2024/01...
I know nothing about this situation, but I bet it's like when they say Trump = Hitler, because he had a rally at MSG.
The full text search is a little confusing because it doesn't actually search them in order, though it appears to at first. And if you click "next" a few times and then "prev" the same number of times, you don't necessarily end up back at the same UUID you were at before. It's a neat-seeming trick though.
You’re going to need a smidge more than that.
https://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html
does a pretty good job on the tradeoffs. Something like WAL you'd want to look a bit deeper on... but need not go too far afield:
https://www.sqlite.org/wal.html
You also need VRAM for context: the larger the context, the more RAM you need.
Did any of the governments protesting the war decide to arm the Irakis while they tried and failed to defend their homeland? No.

SH was a dictator for sure but these wars were illegal just the same and I did not see the EU kicking the US out of the swift payment system of impose sanctions on them.

The moral posturing of the west is a show. The west is happy to go to war when it pleases it but should anyone else do it, then that is a problem.
> Yikes.

That's a common response these days and while I empathize, I think it's wrong. The right response IMHO is, essentially, 'fuck them; they can't stop us'.

A Soviet dissident (I don't recall the name atm) advised not talking about your arrest, torture, detention - the horrors, the fear, etc. That's what the oppressors want you to do, to spread fear and intimidation to all the people they didn't arrest; that's half the point of their actions - they don't have the resources to arrest everyone. If you don't talk about it, it's a forgotten moment of one small point in time and space. It's the echoes of it, of people repeating the story, that spread across orders of magnitude more time and space. Don't spread it around and you've disarmed your oppressors.

Also, look at contemporary political movements: The overwhelmingly successful one is barely slowed by attacks, never expresses any fear or intimidation, is always on the offensive. The flailing one is regularly talking about its terror, despair, whether or not there is any hope at all, and quitting.

There's a time and place to talk about your fears - privately, to your trusted confidants (and not to those who depend on you for leadership). Everyone has them; that's fine. Out in public is not the place; that's where you show that you can manage your fears and are resolute, undeterred, unshaken. Think of great leaders - Washington, Lincoln, Churchill, etc. - who ever said 'Yikes'? On social media, we all are leaders.
It is still the same. :(
> That's not sufficient evidence.

Then your standards of evidence are too high, and least for making decisions in this area. It's like you're working in computer security, but you demand evidence a vulnerable system was actually hacked and used maliciously before you're willing to take action to patch it and clear out the infiltration. It's foolish. Patch the damn system.
Many people are easily influenceable, which is why there are rules around campaign funding and transparency. It doesn’t mean that we have to give up on democracy (what would be the alternative?), it means that the rules have to be enforced.
> "We were surprised that fructose was barely metabolized in the tumor types we tested... We quickly learned that the tumor cells alone don’t tell the whole story... one way in which high levels of fructose consumption promote tumor growth is by increasing the availability of circulating lipids in the blood. These lipids are building blocks for the cell membrane, and cancer cells need them to grow... Over the past few years, it’s become clear that many cancer cells prefer to take up lipids rather than make them

A bit of a red herring, but still interesting.
> E.g. I never, ever run Dropbox's 'app'. I have no interest in their weird way of looking at files. I just want my docs to be available everywhere. That's it.

Thank you. This is the kind of intuitive example I was seeking.
Both are also much smaller than what the US government does to you on a daily basis. However, all of them are bad.
They did? I missed the part where a billion people are dead. Last I checked, the population is still going up. I asked if there were any climate models making such a prediction.
Your last paragraph reminded me that I had to set up Waydroid so I could install Telegram(Android). Just so I could create an account, so I could then use the already installed Telegram desktop that came by default with like any mobile distribution I tried.
The first link is not dead. None of them are.

Kherson is not empty of civilians. Your link only claims that "southern" Kherson was evacuated. If you look at a map it's pretty clear why - it's at low elevation and hard to reach due to various waterways. It was also hit hard by the flooding after the Khakovka dam was destroyed.

It is extremely trivial to find out that Kherson still has a significant civilian presence, although many have indeed left.

And FFS you can see in the video that several of the people targeted are clearly elderly or medics / firefighters.

https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/10/1155191

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/22/europe/kherson-russia-advance...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMpTUOgqkuo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zye_R7M0nFU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8C2k37I6N8

So again, if you don't actually know what you're talking about, maybe pipe down about Ukraine.
They were basically forced into this by being so far behind that they'd need to rent OAI or Anthropic services to stay competitive, which at their scale would've probably cost them more than it takes to train llama and benefit from community research help.

At least that was the rationale behind the intentional leak of llama 1 back in the day according to some sources anyway.
Seems like the only feature missing (besides social sharing mentioned in the blog post) is deep linking to specific UUIDs.
You don't get to use your own definition of the phrase "free and fair" here. Romanian law prescribes that political campaigns need to be transparent in source and funding. They weren't, as per the Romanian court. End of discussion.
The expensive power electronics you speak of are not part of the dispenser. The dispenser is really just a very fancy switch. It performs some payment authorization and then switches on those expensive power electronics.

If you look at a modern Electrify America unit, the dispenser is an extremely slim panel with a screen. It clearly isn't big enough to contain these power electronics.

Now transformer isn't a great name because it implies an AC-to-AC device which this is not. So I can see where the confusion comes from.
Seeing "sponsored campaign ad" is an instant skip for most people.
Tried out the feed finder on my blog again and I have another bug to report - it seems the URLs on the page can cause a crash within the web app! my blog (at matthew.science) uses Zola SSG, and it seems the URLs are formatted with a preceding //: '<a href="//matthew.science/posts/riscv/">Basics of the RISC-V ISA</a>'

This causes the following error: TypeError: URL constructor: //matthew.science/posts/riscv/ is not a valid URL.
Universal Dovetailer
> I always feel like if I don't understand the "why" I really don't know the tool

What I find for me, and what I think is really common, is that a longwinded "why" is not the right place to start - it's too dry, not practical, and I can bounce off it without understanding.

Starting with a demo, a "you can use this tool to do xyx in 5 lines of code, here's how" makes me see that it has value, to get a basic feel for it. And once that is in place I get that it has value - it's like a hook to hang the "explanation" on.

Then the reference is useful later, when you're somewhat familiar, but need to check a specific thing that you don't know yet. You don't need or want to read a long multi-paragraph explanation to confirm a technical "yes or no" question.
> with official visitors such as ministers and presidents

Okay, name two presidents who visited the NAFO summit.
Tangentially related:

HN recently (last few months) had an article explaining how large a number was. The number was something like busy beaver or 128 bit integers or something else.

It illustrated how large the number was by creating activities you would do, incrementing the counter as you did them. The sequence went something like this:

Walk, and every time you take a step. Add 1

After you have circled the earth, place a sheet of paper on a pile, and start walking again.

Continue, until the paper pile reaches the sun, then place a grain of sand in the Grand Canyon and start over.

Continue until you have filled the Grand Canyon, etc etc

It continued for a lot of such steps until you finally counted up to the number in question.

What was the number? What were the steps?
Just like the umpire at the tennis match can grant victory to player X, and then take their title away when the doping tests come back.
You think this CEO had more 'mens rea' than a city police chief (or the other examples I listed)? The police chief is literally responsible for purchasing guns, distributing them to officers, and telling the latter to use the former to coerce people!
TikTok faces US ban after losing court battle
That's a version 1 UUID, site only has version 4's
I think you missed some important details salient to understanding the conflict in Gaza.
At least the Tesla implementation of their latest stuff, dispenser to faster charger ratio is 1:1. Their older design would gang 2 dispensers to a single 150kW combined charge rate, but new ones are 250kW per dispenser for each port simultaneously.
> "Where’s my dopamine?"

I'm not in management, but couldn't OP become a working manager? Might depend on the size of their team and demands of the new role, but I've worked with managers who wear their IC hat on occasion and thought it was a positive value-add for the group as a whole.
Ah well fuck, looks like some projects will have to move to Forgejo
WSJ earlier this year reported that a Trump donor is an investor in TikTok and has been pushing to save TikTok from a ban: https://www.wsj.com/business/how-tiktoks-trump-whisperer-cha...
>>For example, can you tell me if EU is about saving the environment and stopping climate change? If so why they are blocking the Chinese electric cars? Can't stand others making the world better place better than they do?

Because China Gives Two Shits about the environment. Them and their "developing country" tag. They will burn the coal until there is no more, along with India.

Because China Gives No Shit about democracy, or human rights.

China isn't shy to show force. The "west" is already at war with China but hasn't realized it. Heck, they still don't accept war with Rusia started over a decade ago
It was a bluff to make a weaker Ukraine.

Just a reminder to that moment:

1.Russia sponsored separatist movement in Donbass with money, weapons and agents.
2. Russia directly occupied Crimea while lying they do not.
3. Russia signed a Budapest memorandum to respect Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders and restrain to use force against it.
4. Russia signed a series of Minsk peace treaties.

Why you think that they really offered a peace in a good faith? History of modern Russia, USSR and empire show any peace treaty or other international documents with nothing, just a waste of the paper.

Russians always lie. That's putty western world are blind because Russian bribes are too good to miss.
At a quick glance, it's missing at least malloc(3) and printf(3); I'd guess much more besides.