skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You would probably increase your subscription rate by not putting a signup page before the demo.
You Want That Gift to Arrive Today? This Is What It Takes
Every morning you, the new you, would not know. And unless the old you died while sleeping, they would know - however briefly.
The CCP gave itself the name CCP up until after the civil war when it tried to change it to CPC to distance itself from anything written about the CCP and attempt to deny any association.

CCP/CPC is the same thing, same party, same history.
Oh I'm sure, the ACM UI was impossible to use for years to find certificates, they improved it, but, it will never have the same level of functionality that the API gives you and that's the bread and butter.
https://archive.is/Ry2hr
Intel's foundry side has been floundering so hard that they've resorted to using TSMC themselves in an attempt to keep up with AMD. Their recently launched CPUs are a mix of Intel-made and TSMC-made chiplets, but the latter accounts for most of the die area.
I remember seeing this when it hit the internet:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5bLRH-PoMY

40,000 erlang nodes in a cluster

lots of specifics about what tweaks they use. Rewatching, it seems like you don't have to really use the modified BEAM except in a few small soft-code (replace OTP/stdlib functionality) where they provide enough information that you could probably write it yourself if you had to, and a lot of the optimizations have been upstreamed into core BEAM -- WA is a pretty good citizen of the ecosystem.
If you want to load up 405B @ FP_16 into a single H100 box, how do you do it? You get two boxes. 2x the price.

Models are getting larger, not smaller. This is why H200 has more memory, but the same exact compute. MI300x vs. MI325x... more memory, same compute.
I mean, we know about all kinds of microbes that can be in the brains of "unhealthy" people, and we've known that for ages (taxoplasmosis and CJD come to mind).

The association in the article isn't a case of "we didn't find it in healthy people", but "we found it in more in unhealthy people".

From the article: "It found that, while there was a remarkable diversity of species in the control brains, there were often overgrowths of certain bugs in Alzheimer’s brains."
I'm typing way slower than AI characters have patience to wait for
> It's inevitably going to be a mere copy of you. You don't get to experience any of it.

You can make the same argument for 'you before you went to sleep' and 'you after you woke up'. The only real link you have to that previous consciousness are memories of experiences, which are all produced by your current body/brain.

Think about this: For every consciousness (including you right now) it is _impossible_ to experience anything other than what the thing producing that consciousness produces (memories, sensations, etc.). It doesn't matter whether the different conscious entities or whatever produces them are separated by time or space. They _will_ be produced, and they _will_ experience exactly what the thing that produces them produces.

With an analogy: If you drop pebbles in either the same pond at different times or in different ponds at the same time, waves will be produced in all cases. From the perspectives of the waves themselves, what they interact with is always _exactly_ the stuff that interacts with the water they're made up of. To them, the question of identity or continuity is fully irrelevant. They're just them.

Similarly, it makes no difference whether you only have the memories of the previous conscious experiences, or if 'you' really experienced them. Those situations are indistinguishable to you. The link to future consciousnesses inhabiting your body is effectively the same.
You are 'caring' objectively, we live subjectively, so your caring is of purely academic interest, even, dare I say it, to you.

Subjective continuity is illusionary, you placing import on this illusion is up to you of course, but there is no substantive difference between the discontinuity experienced by your 'copy' in the cloud and what you experience yourself moment to moment.
Without spoiling too much of Cyberpunk 2077, that game offers an intriguing exploration of how this could go horribly wrong.
I imagine the actual cameras are a relatively small part of the overall price
"Performance Analysis and Tuning on Modern CPUs": Second Edition Released
A fraction of what a GPU is used for.
I always find it hilarious that people think the second amendment would matter much in a US civil war (or whatever internal conflict you want to imagine).

If the US military is united behind one group then that's that. If the US military is divided, then god help us caught in the middle.
Man, I'm old enough to remember when 512 was a thing for consumer cards back when we had 4-8gb memory

Sure that was only gddr5 and not gddr6 or lpddr5, but I would have bet we'd be up to 512bit again 10 years down the line..

(I mean supposedly hbm3 has done 1024-2048bit busses but that seems more research or super high end cards, not consumer)
I think he'd agree more with Passion Project not vanity.
I can't think of a single area, other than a subset of games, where domain experts have been outclassed by AI.
You have a very strong point. All of this can't work without a full cohesion.
> Bleeding edge processes is what Intel specializes in. Unlike Apple, they don’t need TSMC.

Intel literally outsourced their Arrow Lake manufacturing to TSMC because they couldn't fabricate the parts themselves - their 20A (2nm) process node never reached a production-ready state, and was eventually cancelled about a month ago.
I agree. Specifically, emojis are not text and I don't really care what edge cases they introduce. It's neat if someone wants to put the work in, but that's not the meat of "text editing" and isn't really worth worrying about.
Probably would jump to Intel once my 3060 gets too old
Emoji is just the easiest way to present these problems to an English-reading audience. For the several billion people reading and writing non-latin scripts where the "edge cases" are important for legibility/correctness, yes, we need text editors that can handle them.
How do LLMs make money though?
I'd say it's less about covering all edge cases and more about showing that text editors are insanely complex, and it doesn't take long to find edge cases that text editors with 10s/100s of millions of users have.
I had so many recommendations for "Surely you're joking Mr Feynman" that I had to read it. I gave up halfway through. It seemed awfully self-serving.
> I think the more accurate denominator would be the world population. People are seeing benefits to LLMs even outside of the office.

For example ?

(besides deep fakes)
> We aren't. It's the individuals who own the resources and money to implement space flight and Mars colonisation that are going to Mars.

> But the people who are doing the innovation and taking the most risk with their own capital will decide.

> will protest about the trillions of "taxpayer dollars that could be put to a better use"

There aren't any individuals that own the resources to implement space flight and mars colonization you yourself admitted as much with the "trillions of taxpayer dollars" Those last 2 quotes contradicting themselves are literally back to back

> Citizens don't really get a say in how national resources are deployed

Every two years we do in the US.

> Your basic assumptions are wrong and troubled by motivated reasoning. But I'm sure you can already tell where you are wrong so I won't condescend.

You have condescended to me but you haven't explained how I'm wrong and I don't think I am. If so pray tell.

Money as a fundamental unit of value outside of economics leads to nonsensical conclusions like taking a money guy who presently employs a stable of geniuses who themselves sit atop the result of man millennia of labor by singular irreplaceable people and assigning credit to the current idiot who owns the works.

It leads you to imagine that owning a hundred billion is as valuable a contribution as a million teachers or that someone who risks 90% of his fortune by ceding a bigger piece of the economic pie to another billionaire and thereby downsizing to fewer trips to space is somehow risking a billion times more than someone actually risking their life.

It's like listening to a psychologist try to understand the evolution of galaxies via their domain knowledge.

Capitalism is a method to allocate resources within a society it offers no meaningful truths about it. It is on the whole a massive failure only slightly less stupid than prior iterations of central planning.

Back on the topic of mars. It is fundamentally absolutely useless as a second home for man. It is at best a place where a small number of people can do interesting science. There wont be a meaningful number of people there because the entire idea is fundamentally flawed.

Would you like to talk about that or would you like to educate me about capitalism and government?
There’s a difference when there could conceivably be two of you.

There will never be two of me in my bed when I wake up, so I’m the same.

If my mind could be copied and embedded in a robot or whatever, then there are two of me, each now diverging. That other one is not me, as far as I, the other, am concerned.
Just curious what you used to generate the video? I like the per pill progress bars.
It is a point of familiarity. Just because you've been coding in multiple languages before doesn't necessarily make you "a better programmer" (in the sense that you've developed good instincts to quickly mentally parse different pieces of code) - you could have been using programming languages of similar paradigms. It took me a few months of writing Clojure (niche language) to start seeing things in a different light - I also, just like you, used to think that imperative constructs are more readable and easier to reason about. I was wrong.

There's no such thing as a "Go person" or a "Haskell person"; all programming languages are made up. Nobody has "more natural inclination" for coding one way than another. Just get your ass out of the comfort zone, try learning a new (to you) language - give it a heartfelt attempt to use it - that may change your life.

Just to be clear - I'm not saying Haskell is easy, oh no, not at all. I'm just saying that it stops being so intimidating and weird after a while.
They aren't "cards" but MI300x has 192GB and MI325x has 256GB.
Some of my first programming experience was using the language inside of a MUSH (TinyTIM to be specific, based on TinyMUSH but heavily modified). Interactive experiences could be built up using the rudimentary logic afforded.

Found this repository of MUSH code if anyone is curious what it looked like: https://www.mushcode.com/

Modifying Eggdrop (the IRC bot written in C) was another project that contributed to my early understanding.
Nope, because you can't get those at the mall downtown, rather have to custom build, ordering from online shops.
You could still decide to do SSR by "wrapping" your Vite project in Astro. Astro is basically "just" a wrapper around Vite with additional support for executing code (Astro files) server-side and some other neat features.
And which blocks of Unicode exactly would you exclude from support and what complexity reduction do you exactly expect from it?

In my experience, the complexity comes from the reality of how we write in different writing systems. I think this is inevitable.
These days, Intel merely specializes in bleeding processes. They spent far too many years believing the unrealistic promises from their fab division, and in the past few years they've been suffering the consequences as the problems are too big to be covered up by the cost savings of vertical integration.
If the mom didn't sleep around that would fix two problems then...
Hmm.

No Views/Triggers/Sequences

No Foreign Key Constraints

No Nested Transactions

No JSONB

No Extensions
I have quit the React/Node/JavaScript ecosystem. I'm going all in on backend. I also feel all the time invested in front end has always wither and vanish. It is hard to accumulate knowledge in the front end field when it is always changing. I'm probably going to lose money on this bet (going from senior front end), but I'm already feeling a lot happier.
Rumor is the 5090 will be bringing back the 512bit bus, for a whopping 1.5TB/sec bandwidth.
I think the only good thing that came out of the 80s was the 90s. I’d leave that decade alone so we can forget about it.
RDS generally is a massive, massive business inside AWS. I'd imagine the politics and organization generally is an absolute nightmare.
I think you'd be hard-pressed to make a case that VC-motivated business scaling does not consistently overinflate the businesses which are artificially propped up by investor cash. There are a bunch of companies, existing and dead, that show the folly of growth-at-high-cost.
The funny thing about Cerebras is that it doesn't scale well at all for inference and if you talk to them in person, they are currently making all their money on training workloads.
Because LPDDR5x is soldered on RAM.

Everyone else wants configurable RAM that scales both down (to 16GB) and up (to 2TB), to cover smaller laptops and bigger servers.

GPUs with soldered on RAM has 500GB/sec bandwidths, far in excess of Apples chips. So the 8GB or 16GB offered by NVidia or AMD is just far superior at vid o game graphics (where textures are the priority)
I've just spent past week building a medium complex web app for editing configs at $work, so I can chime on this.

Having worked with earlier versions of sveltekit in the past, I have to say the new reactivity system is not that bad and pretty easy to wrap your head around. Once you're used to the runes (there's like 4 you have to remember) you can just focus on building stuff and it's really quite a pleasant and productive dev experience. I've gotten multiple compliments from people about the speed and quality I was able to deliver this with and that's in large part due to sveltekit.

I do have to give a shout out to good ol' bootstrap for allowing me to build something that looks good, works on mobile and is just easy.
Even if this worked, I find this idea morally repulsive. It just seems utterly selfish.
What leg do you think you have to stand on when it comes to Rust in Linux? Linus Torvalds is fine with the Kernel experimenting with Rust.
> All we hear is radio ga ga
Radio blah, blah
Radio, what's new?
Radio, someone still loves you

> Invisible airwaves crackle with life
Bright antennas bristle with the energy
Emotional feedback on a timeless wavelength
Bearing a gift beyond price, almost free
As someone who doesn't listen to the radio in FM or AM, does it really make sense to comment on your thoughts regarding how often and why it's listened to by most people? You're not one of them.

I've owned CDs since the early 90s. I e owned several good MP3 players. I have several USB drives with music on them.
I haven't touched any of those in about a decade, and instead listen to the radio every day.
Oops, that should be China, not Chad.
Of all things, The Venture Bros convinced me otherwise that the copies “are” me, enough to matter anyway.
In my experience, it's more common than we suspect. I've met quite a few people in their 60s with fascinating hobbies. Some of it boils down to the fact that they had many decades to get good - and with career in the rearview mirror and adult children, they have a lot more time, too.

But it's also true that with age, you lose the drive to get praise from strangers - so at best, you get a text website viewed by hundreds, not a series of TikTok or YouTube videos viewed by millions. And sometimes, not even that website.

When that person dies and leaves behind a man-sized vacuum tube computer, or a collection of vintage calculators, or something of that sort... the heirs usually don't have the willpower to carry on, and because the stuff is impossible to sell, it's often destined for the dump. Maybe a couple of years in a storage unit before that.

It's even worse with digital assets. Who's gonna renew that hobby domain or pay that hosting bill? I've seen some really valuable online resources disappear after the author died.
ASCAP/BMI charge radio stations a lot for a license to play music. Spotify's licensing costs are pennies for the same reach as a local radio station. It's no surprise that the expensive distribution channel is packed with ads.
Sure. Either way: not a thing sustained for its utility. I think running independent rock radio stations is admirable. It sounds fun. But if it's losing him millions of dollars, obviously, he should immediately stop doing it.
I'll add that while `jj` itself is a CLI, people have made GUIs on top of it that allow for drag and dropping of commits:

https://github.com/gulbanana/gg
https://www.visualjj.com/
OP, contact me, also from Argentina.
It's not just more propellant. Note the engineering that went into keeping the thing from burning up. Or look at the MESOS rocket--the guy who built that took the choice of delayed ignition of the second stage, accepting the extra gravity loss in exchange for less drag loss.

And if you don't have a guidance system you have to complete your burn low enough that aerodynamic forces keep your rocket pointed up during the burn. The bigger your burn the more of an issue that becomes.
Funny, just yesterday I was complaining about OpenAI's gptbot's stupidity costing site operators too much: https://x.com/chfritz/status/1863689365740020012
So if we copy you into a robot and the copying process leaves you unharmed and awake, are they both you?
I've been blocking .shop, .top, .xyz, and several other new TLDs but only specific TLDs where we see high (or all) spam. For our org, this means I also block .in and .jp in SMTP, as those are almost exclusively spam for us too.
Then stop it in its tracts by removing it's ONLY current transmission method. Say what you want about morality, I'm not talking about that. Just the cold hard facts that if you don't have sex you can't get STIs by definition.

imagine a world where there was no casual sex... ALL STIs would disappear in a single generation.
How does any of this make money?
Pydantic AI
> I am convinced the syntax was intentionally developed to troll us all with the ugliest syntax on the planer..

Not a troll. Just a bit too concessionary to C++ developers. :)
I think first year premium pricing makes a lot of sense. I'm not sure what the average time to sell is for a domain investor, but say it's 10 years for an easy example.

If you go from a standard registration price of $12 / year to a first year premium of $132, you double the 10 year carrying cost of a domain. That, naively, means domain investors can only speculate on half as many domains.

By having a first year premium price and then dropping domains back into the 'standard' tier, you also leave registrants with a semblance of price protections via section 2.10c of the registry agreement. As-is, premium domains have zero guarantees when it comes to premium renewal pricing.

There's a lot of room between squeezing domain investors and asking registrants to pay $100-1000+ per year for premium domains.
At least you get to look a human being in the eye in actual court.

I ran into the buzzsaw of Amazon's KDP self-publishing fraud detection bots, which decided that my Kindle was plagiarizing my paperback (duh, it's the same book). I went through a series of Kafkaesque email appeals — all denied with progressively vaguer justifications. By the final appeal, there was literally no concrete point left to even argue against, just vague wording about creating a negative experience for readers.

I'm not sure a human ever looked at my case. Or if they did, they had a huge incentive to just rubber-stamp the bot's decision and move on. The whole experience was soul-crushing, and I didn't even have that much at stake compared to some. I hope the architects and implementers of this system run into something similar someday so they know how it feels. The only recourse I've ever seen work is to tweet or create a blog post and have it go viral.
To save people a search: https://gitbutler.com/
Contamination is possible, but it's hard to explain the results that way. Definitely needs replication, of course.

I don't see the point of the samples all being from older individuals. Even if it exclusively occurs in older individuals (unlikely), it would still mean that the blood-brain barrier is not 100% effective (which we already know to be true).
My longest running web app[1] is also my most complex. Although I do use HTMX, I use it very sparingly.[2]

90%+ of what you need for a web app that you're building as a one-person show can be handled by storing state in the URL - people these days can be quick to forget that this is how large and complex web apps like GitHub have run for many, many years.

With regards to complexity in templates, I find that you can cut down on a lot of that complexity if you enforce type constraints in your templating engine's context object.

Getting in a habit of doing this early gets you thinking about ways to shift things that require conditional logic to the pre-templating stage, and more often than not it leads you to breaking down bigger templates into smaller partials and using them to compose different template variations for different views. I like this and it makes a lot of sense to me, but I'm not sure how it would feel to people who have only ever written JS SPA web apps.

[1]: https://notado.app

[2]: Example of the only place I use HTMX in Notado (to show search results as you type): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMxmf132-8k
Even LPDDR requires a large die. It only takes things out of the realm of technologically impossible to merely economically impractical. A 512-bit bus is still very inconveniently large for a single die.
Any insight as to why newer GPS satellites do not offer similar capabilities?
> from a cost-effectiveness point of view

What's the cost-effectiveness of a master selling one of his female slave's children away from her, which was a regular occurrence?
Yeah, a non-divided military + police usually means a very short and decisive civil war, in observable modern cases. The exceptions tend to involve a divided armed forces, or extensive foreign interference on behalf of the rebels (see: Syria).

For some reason, folks like to cite US foreign intervention failures as proof motivated locals with rifles can beat the US military, but that's not really the right thing to look at, as a bunch of things about those situations are materially different from a civil war (plus there is in every case a ton more to the resistance's armament and materiel than some guys taking their old AKs out of the closet, dusting them off, and digging into their prepper-crates of MREs)
Emoji are text in all the ways that matter to a programmer. There are codepoints in Unicode which aren't textual, but emoji are not among them.

Emoji don't introduce any edge cases of their own. If your software can't join a skin tone to a thumbs up, it also will fall apart on composing many scripts used by hundreds of millions of people.

So if you really want to get all kids-these-days about emoji, go ahead, but support Unicode properly. You'll get correct emoji handling as a consequence of that anyway, and you can still signal whatever message you're intending to send here about yourself in some other way.
While I love to take potshots, the yes(configurable) next to that 100gb does some heavy lifting.

I imagine that number is tunable up to multi digit tb if you your monthly bill is worth Jassy's attention

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/aurora-dsql/latest/userguide/CHA...

The more interesting (i.e. constraining) limits are transaction size (both row count and data size) and transaction time, which aren't configurable.
What I believe what throwaway guy means by
"despite all evidence to the contrary"
is that evidence he see points that Myanmar is Fine.

Unless he says otherwise this is what I think..