skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well, good news, it's not a new feature at all:

> Interestingly, it used to be more of an internal tool, but recently there’s been a push to make it public

I think your anti-intellectual bubble should be safe.
>Once again, I'll reiterate my point that you seem to be confused as to what democracy is. You're allowed to be a shitty person and to be elected if that's what your country's people want. The time to make these arguments was before the election. And the people to make them to was your fellow countrymen, not random foreigners online. If there was some confusion regarding that, maybe you'll have better luck next time.

There is no confussion, it is legal to ask the courts to declare an election void because illegal stuff happened like fraud, or the candidate did not followed the electoral laws. It is a shame that the fraud or Ruzzian influence evidence did not appeared before the campaign started but they were clever about this, the guy was less then 1% in oppinions polls and nobody know who he is.

Theadministration does not order the Constitutional Court around and the vote was in unanimity. I suggest you keep an eye on this and what new evidence will appear, sorry that our system does not allow a criminal to be president if he managed to trick some people.

Also probably you are not aware, the presidential elections were in two tours, so the fascist guy gained 25% votes , he did not win 51% votes and the elections were cancelled , the final tour was cancelled because of the interference.
> I am curious what you think the more rational way to be is in this world.

I think there's a general sense among the owning class (who largely inherited their ownership from their daddies) that the only rational and moral response for somebody who can't pay their societal rent is apoptosis.
User above was making a point.

And you are lucky to not see an org where everything is a microservice that uses some unusual database, because the poeple responsible wanted to use some fancy new technology. Also seems you were lucky to not see messy development where some data is in a legacy system, some in new (which doesnt quite work), some in "cool" mongoDB that uses math.random to report just 10% of errors and rest is plugged via CSV files coming from ERP edited in Excel...
Murder is also not legal. Obviously legality of actions is not a key factor in decision making here
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/UNH/financials/

Total revenue (all money brought in) – $389b

All money paid out in claims – $303b

Money left over for running the business $85b

Cost of running the business – $69b

Profit – $14b

So it basically appears that for every $1 us customers pay to United Healthcare, $0.75 goes to medical providers, $.21 to running the business, and $.04 to profit.

Those numbers don’t seem like gouging to me, what do you think?
Politicians could copy paste the eu regulatory/payment system or make it illegal for employers to provide healthcare.

There are a couple of pivot points that could fix things now that we have the data.
Yep, I used to get caught up in headlines and I’m sure I still read too much into them but if there is an outlandish comment/position/opinion in the title OR something that perfectly fits with my “world view” I make myself find the real quote/line which often just further erodes trust in reporting institutions.

You need to consider your source of course, but more often than not the more outlandish the claim the more likely it was misquoted or they had the wrong takeaway.
"Crypto" like Bitcoin and Monero have legitimate (non scam/non-greed-driven roots) academic roots and solve entirely real non-scam product problems. ETH is academically interesting as a platform, but as far as I've seen has not "solved" any real product problems people care about in a real way at scale that has persisted (I.e. not fads) or that don't actually NEED the concept of a Blockchain. Being able to transact and store value without a central entity solves a myriad of problems, including, but definitely not limited to:

* Sending funds internationally is much much easier, an order of magnitude less expensive, and several orders of magnitude faster than going through the traditional banking system. It's entirely next level and there are plenty of legitimate reasons why people need to send international wires.

* Transacting in legal, but morally divisive areas, where traditional banking/finance might shut down your business just because it doesn't like what you're doing or is scared of the risk. E.g. selling cannabis products, sex industry stuff (porn, sex work), gambling, etc. people may not like some of these businesses and want to impose their own morals to get rid of them, but crypto makes this impossible in ways the traditional banking system can't.

Point is: there is absolutely a toooon of BS scammery in crypto. And many naughty things it can enable. It's the financial Wild West. But to call all crypto a "BS scam" is simply untrue. It would be like calling the entire Internet a BS scam just because of what it enables (plenty of scams, online gambling, porn sites, darknet markets) and the immense energy it consumes. But like the Internet, the technology is fundamentally useful. You've got your blinders on a bit too strongly if you believe otherwise.
Plugshare.com made that about a decade ago.

https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a40897680/ev-public-ch...
correction: the run of the eights is 3332cccd, not 3332bbbc.
I am deeply sceptical of the 7x claim. It's easy to find a great improvement when you chose a bad baseline. For example if you just plonk a traditional fan-on-a-stick in the same place, it will probably be terrible, but there are non-AI upright designs that might be in the same ballpark. I don't doubt they have a way to make substantial site-specific design adjustments, but I do doubt that much improvement over the most suitable but not customised design you can already buy today.

Also the AI angle is pretty silly hype because multidimensional optimisation techniques have been part of the industrial design toolbox for decades. Wind turbine companies are very keenly aware of optimisation algorithms for squeezing everything out of a blade geometry. CFD is an entire field for a reason.

Random 2006 article in numerical optimisation of vertical wind turbines from a careless search: https://iawe.org/Proceedings/CWE2006/MC3-01.pdf
What about the many thousands of families who have been forced into bankruptcy or have had loved ones die due to actions he's ultimately responsible for? I don't think there's anything wrong in having zero sympathy. It strikes me as a very human reaction.
Stored procedures just add overhead and make everyone's lives harder. Forget about any ORMs, you're writing raw SQL with all the quirks of PL/pgSQL biting you all the time.
Lots of applications for the technology are likely and already being used.
Llama to improve Customer to Product Matching through content analysis.
Llama for Ad Generation based on customer and product profiles.
Llama to generate additional chat signal for humans not chatting with other humans.
Llama as a site content moderator.
Llama as a code generation assistant.
Llama to clean up and improve internal wikis.
Llama as an operational analysis tool to detect inefficiencies in internal communication...

They will use it every in every situation where they find a successful use case. Open sourcing the weights buys goodwill but it won't be long before everyone open sources their weights since the only real long term moats are the successful products built around the technology and not the technology itself. Facebook is its own moat. Altman suggested this outcome a few days ago in his NYT DealBook interview when he compared the transformer model to the transistor.
I think someone murdered by an assassin is tautologically a victim.
poudriere is roughly 3 FreeBSD Update clients of sh code: https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/blob/master/src/share/p...
Go is considered a memory safe language.
the course website feels like the exact type of scam i ward elderly people off.
I'm still getting dopamine off getting a team member promoted, two years later. Every success they make reminds me that I helped them build that confidence and those skills. Manager-side successes might not be obvious and daily, but they have staying power like you wouldn't believe.
Good example, I was struggling to come up with other public indifference to killings. Maybe some mobsters?

What makes the UH CEO so different is that he was, presumably, innocent. A bad person for humanity and the public, Absolutely, but legally innocent.
>Democracy only functions if the outcomes cannot be bought.

Then by definition absolutely every democratic country/society does not function, because guess what: It takes truly stupid amounts of money to win an election. Ergo, you need to buy the election.

Every single candidate and party and reform movement who have argued for removing money from democratic politics have all lost/failed without a single exception. You absolutely cannot win an election without money, without buying it.

The only saving grace is that the guy who spends the most money doesn't always win.

We can go on for years about how it's stupid you need money to win an election, how the amount of money is despicable, how the world is unfair. Whatever: We aren't living in ideal dreams, we're living in the brutally unfair and practical reality.
> But even if you have to ask something algorithmical, I'd prefer the style of "Advent of Code" exercises where the same problem has variations and multiple levels of complexity.

That's how Amazon does their interviews.
Well, you threw 401k in there for some reason.

But living paycheck to paycheck to most people definitely does include spending one’s money on non-bill things like lotto tickets, consumer goods, restaurants, and things beyond their means.
Remember that the current narrative is an average person with nothing to lose taking down a powerful person who uses their power for greed and evil. That's a very powerful and empowering idea.

Other powerful people, who know they are just as greedy and evil, desperately want to change that narrative because they know how weak their position truly is if we collectively decide we're done with the capitalistic status quo.

Bringing in an "expert" to explain to how it's probably something else, without any evidence to support that hypothesis, and while completely ignoring the observer bias of the chosen expert, is a good example of trying to subvert the story.
This sounds so stupid. I'm sorry but feedback is already given in PRs. This kind of feedback is just a bad idea IMO. Focus on growth and areas of improvements. Your reports often already know what they should focus on, and they are on their own journey of time management. The only lever you have as a manager is to add or remove pressure. The only help you can give is through mentoring or therapy/coaching.
> Instead we should invest time in understanding why our laws and society structure allows (even promotes) the kind of corporate exploitation of the public that is enough to drive someone to murder.

We already know the answer to why. Its because corporate exploitation of the public is profitable. The US could at any time switch to a universal health care system like just about every other industrialized nation and the entire claim-denying middle-man financial parasite insurance model would evaporate.
Worse than people dying, even more common a single health event can literally bankrupt a family. This happens every day, all day. 41% of Americans have some sort of health care debt. Over 3 million Americans owe more than $10,000 in medical debt. The average American can’t swing an unexpected $2000 expense, imagine how destructive this is, and what is it for? Record profits for insurance companies?
it's like saying "we didn't like the radio on your Hyundai's so we got all bmws"

most of the world cannot even afford S or A models from Samsung.
> With that kind of applicant pool, I’m honestly not sure what the best approach is

You should see the number of people that apply to college.
Reading the comments here just makes me feel like managers are useless. This role doesn't have to exist. It's just fluff.
Joined Facebook to fight terror, now she is convinced we need to fight Facebook
It won't have any results until the community shares their 3 favorite reads, and it updates the page hourly as those come in :)
You could use C#: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/data-tools/co...
Show HN: Split Screen for Chrome – Great for Study, Research, and Stock Charts
> I hope you give it a try!

How are we supposed to do that? Clicking "register" leads to a google form, there's nothing to try.

"Show HN is for something you've made that other people can play with. *HN users can try it out*, give you feedback, and ask questions in the thread."

"Off topic: blog posts, *sign-up pages*, newsletters, lists, and other reading material. *Those can't be tried out, so can't be Show HNs.* Make a regular submission instead."
Voting with your money works in a fair market for competitive goods and services, but health insurance is neither competitive nor a direct service, and it's also not a fair market (in the USA at least).

In the USA, most health insurance plans are through private companies that have group plans with employers.

This is a terrible system, because many employers just want to check the box of offering plans, so do not negotiate good plans for their employees (the best / most profitable companies might have good health insurance, but most not so much).

It also very famously ties your health insurance status to your employment status, which gives a whole tone to the American discourse of labor laws. People are desperate to keep their jobs to keep their medical coverage.

The US gov is trying to make it more competitive with healthcare.gov, which really only highlights how bad the situation is (you're hard pressed finding a healthcare marketplace plan for less than 200$/month without income tax credits).

So the average American is stuck with plans they didn't negotiate for, with limited options for choosing better plans, and insurance very often deny coverage / include hidden fees / are generally inept at providing any type of service beyond taking your money.

There's no way to vote with your wallet, when everyone in the business seems to be a crook at worst and an uncaring suit at best.
> A high-paying FAANG job isn't going to hire candidates based on just one remote Zoom tech interview.

What do you think they do? One round of interviews was enough for my Google recruiter to congratulate me on getting a job there.

Did I get the job? No. But the process didn't include any other interviews. There's only one round.
A major ISP's "outage check" feature sends all the data back client-side for the actual outage ticket, including circuit IDs, dispatch status, and if the outage is valid for customer credit. I now just hit that API as needed to check when shit goes sideways.

Meanwhile, if you put your ZIP in you just get a little friendly "We're working on it! :)".

I love data firehoses like that.
Given that op talks about not staying in the Schengen zone too long, I assume they just used tourist visas.

When I lived in Ireland I occasionally met people who would bounce between Ireland/UK and Schengen to reset their visa clocks (people from US, Canada, etc. can spend 3 months at a time, or 6 months a year, in Schengen, though eventually you might start getting tougher questions).
> There just may not be as much of a need for as many humans in the future as robots are built instead.

Maybe, but we may never get there if the population that can build robots becomes too small to impact the direction of the economy.

> So maybe instead of 8 billion humans, we will have 1 billion humans and 99 billion robots

It's fun until you ask yourself, how will you allocate voting rights?

That is, again, if we can even get there, because again, differences in birth rates across countries and cultures, plus voting rights, means a shift in mindsets and priorities.
I’d rather take the Occam’s razor approach here instead of the conspiracy theorist one.

Health care execs are always under litigation. They are the named officers of their corporate units and therefore the legal representatives of their entities.

Private health care aggrieves hundreds to thousands of people a day. It’s rather someone who lost a loved one or who is in financial distress due to decisions made by this corporation than some deep dark conspiracy.
Hello pessimizer! Please get yourself a few romanian tik-tok accounts, browse as a young man, and you will see what relentless propaganda has been produced.
I am sorry this information, ie. the videos, are not widely available on the internet. (like most of the good useful information, if I may add)
I agree with your take, it's just that many programmers want to easily jump from "byte array" to "string in XYZ encoding". I personally prefer byte arrays for unsafe data and to do deserialization in application code.
Well, people are generally social animals.

Also, whether we like it or not we depend on other people. If you want to get hired, reproduce, sell stuff, or just not be a hermit, it matters what people think of you.

Sometimes that means changing who you are. Sometimes it means finding people who are more like you (I know that I hate living in most rural areas based on the people I've met in them, for instance). Maybe a combination.
It seems that 00000000-0000-4000-8000-000000000000 is the "smallest" UUID generated by 2645248903793120745936665251644898482.
I liked the style of the author made it felt more personal albeit with so many citations it sounds a bit like trying too much to look intellectual.

But I don't know the author and I'd take this over a dry summary.
it looks like spiderbasic is from the same company as purebasic.

there is a link at the bottom of the purebasic web site to the spiderbasic web site:

https://www.purebasic.com

mdp2021's comment also indicates that:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42349737
Belgium found guilty of crimes against humanity in colonial Congo
> Hell the hammer and sickle were way worse than the swastika in every objective measure

You are a moron
PSA: The Kagi search engine directly funds Yandex –- and refuses to stop
My mom was a navy brat in the 60's and 70's and she didn't like moving all the time, but has said that having a bunch of other families right next door all with little kids and stay at home moms actually made for a pretty great childhood.
You're just using your kids as an excuse for your own short comings. People do done all those things you listed while having more than two kids. Seriously, blaming your health problems on your children?
Orban has been doing his "illiberal democracy" (i.e. not a democracy) thing for 15+ years now. The EU is about as laughably powerless to stop him as I am to stop a punch by Floyd Mayweather. So it's kinda funny you say that.
https://zetcode.com/db/sqlitevb/
Another option is to print solid, with 100% infill, then place the part in a tin filled with very fine salt, and bake it to re-melt the plastic to make a solid block w/o layer lines (note that this requires the use of a plastic which will melt and resolidify a second time and be usable).

That said, additional axes beyond XYZ seem to be the next major development for hobby CNC --- looking forward to seeing what folks come up with.
There is another important point, which is that FDM 3D prints are typically much weaker between layers than within a layer (anistropic due to the bonding). Having more control over the plane of the layers could open up some interesting design choices for functional parts.
I think you must be very young to make that last point. Basically you are saying that your whole retirement life will have no value. As someone who will probably retire in 10 or 15 years, I definitely hope to have a reasonably long and healthy retirement to enjoy. That being said, I'm not going to go to extreme measures like avoiding all sugar (which are scientifically dubious in any case)
"Birmingham’s relatively low wind speeds "

Is there a clue in there somewhere?

IMHO we should carefully pick our climate/energy fights, and install whatever tech is most appropriate, even if that's 'nothing, here, build a transmission line to the irish sea offshore wind farms instead'.

I do like the cleverness of custom parametric solutions, but also hate them for their specific, non-reusable, design-overhead aspects. Just deploy a few more cheap, modular, repairable, replaceable, generic units, instead of the costly custom designs.
Not the exact git GUI, but bear in mind Word has supported offline edit/merge for decades and it's done in a similar way (you see diffs visually and can accept/reject them). Lawyers depend on that workflow heavily.
Thing is it's absolutely possible to scale up your spending to any income level. And this is indeed what happens with many people, this is how you get these NYT pieces on households struggling on $500k. If you go by this the whole expression is kinda meaningless.
> Instead we should invest time in understanding why our laws and society structure allows (even promotes) the kind of corporate exploitation of the public that is enough to drive someone to murder.

What are you talking about? Isn't blatant corporate greed simply the product of the societal and financial culture that the country is practically built upon?

If you insist on playing naive, let me spell it out for you.

1. A corporation's main aim is shareholder value increase, at any cost that is a) legally permissible b) doesn't kill the company. For what its worth, #1.a is also negotiable now, see 2.2 below.

2. In order to ensure this:

2.1 They pay political campaigns to get the politicians in power so that those politicians can shape the laws in their favor.

2.2 They employ ex-government officials to incentivize them to be not too harsh with the corporations during their tenure at the government - you don't bite the hand that will feed you once you retire from your current government job.

2.3 They pay lobbying groups to influence the laws the politicians will make (most are already bought (see #2.1) but it is so much cheaper to lobby compared to the outsized payout that spending a bit more for maximum support is a no-brainer).

3. In order to maximize shareholder value, they need to maximize their profits. If denying claims helps them do it, they will do so. Who will stop them? Politicians? See #2 above.

4. How do politicians ensure they can enable #1?

5.1 By making it legal for corporations to pump cash via PACs and super PACs so that #2.1 can continue.

5.2 By pushing extremism (left or right) and polarize people into groups. It is easy for sharks to feed if the herring move as a group. How can they do it easily? Technology companies with the power of internet enable it greatly (they are also companies after all, see #1).

6. The cycle continues and worsens and people keep getting squeezed until someone says fuck it and does something like the event this thread is about.

PS: people get all worked up about Roe vs. Wade. The real cancer was Citizens United (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC).
This "experts say" type explaination might have worked back when publications pushing such a literary style explainations had credibility.
This sounds like one hell of a hack! Can you go into a bit more detail about how you have it set up?
Well at some point if all the CEOs get killed they won't find a new one to take the lead...
So why is physical force so important here? If I poison someone, they’re just as dead as if I’d stuck a knife in them.
Do they gain information, or just have lower loss?

Too much information encoded in a model can lower performance (called overfitting)

That’s why many NN topologies include dropout layers.
Not sure why are you getting down voted to express an informative take.

It feels like I'm on Reddit and not in a place that should be more intellectually active and open.