skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
For context a GCS Score of 3 is:

+1 Your eyes don’t open for any reason.
+1 You can't speak or make sounds.
+1 You don’t move in response to pressure.

So you get points for existing, and the tests can include causing pain (pinch ear, press nail bed, knuckles to chest [depending on jurisdiction]) to make someone have movement.

However, while GCS of 3 is the bottom of the GCS chart, it's not the only measurement used.

"Conclusions. We believe that patients with blunt head injury presenting with a GCS score of 3 should be treated aggressively. Our results showed that 50.8% of these patients survived their injury and 13.2% achieved a good functional outcome at the 6-month follow-up." - NIH

My favorite part of GCS: Emergency care books say "don't worry you don't have to memorize this, you'll always have a chart", yet calculating it exactly is on 2 different US emergency care national exams.
That’s cool. I’m working on an AI bot that reads likes and comments on other LinkedIn posts. Soon no human will be reading OR writing that slop!
Visual Calculus
The craziest thing to me is how...clean these results are. No nudity. No porn. No gore. Nothing overly sensitive. There is no doubt that so much of that stuff would have been initially uploaded but blocked by YouTube's filters. There are a million hours of video uploaded to the service every day, and they have built the infrastructure to analyze every single frame. When people ask why there are no viable competitors to YouTube – this is your answer.
While watching, I started playing a fun game where I try to guess the location of the video, GeoGuessr style. Very interesting when it comes to the odd handheld angles and low quality of some of the video clips. Would recommend.
That is true (in that it is a statement always true of all subjects), and I don't think anyone was disputing that. Simply pointing out that we don't know of any reason an identical copy in an identical state wouldn't obey the laws of physics and perform identically.
I've been through the rabies protocol after a bite from random homeless dog I tried to help.

In the US with insurance it's about $5K out of pocket, and 3 or 4 (can't remember exactly) visits to the ER. the first visit they inject some gelatinous stuff all over the site of the bite site plus the vaccine. And no, they don't inject in your abdominal area anymore. The case will be referred to the city and if possible, the animal will be tested for it. I'm not sure if they have to kill the animal to test. They'll let you know if it was positive though.

It's extremely rare to get rabies, but also it's extremely lethal.
In Rust's case it is that when you say "you have IsA<Device> for all types that implement IsA<PCIDevice>" you are actually saying "you have IsA<Device> for all types, but only if they implement IsA<PCIDevice>".

When you later say "you have IsA<Device> for all types, but only if they implement IsA<I2CDevice>" the two conditions conflict.

It might be possible to avoid this issue with a different implementation but this is the simplest one that works and QEMU's hierarchy is generally shallow. If a better implementation came along, it would be a matter of search and repeat.
Absolutely mesmerized by this, thank you.
What I said is obviously correct, especially historically, and you pointed out exactly why: medium travel, which is far more prevalent than simply modern suburbia. Have you even been outside a city? Take a quick glance at history and you will see just how crucial private transport for medium-long distance is in America. Horses and buggies have been a mainstay before the car. Rail is simply too inflexible to support medium travel in sparsely populated areas. And medium travel is what I would classify most rural Americans are from their nearest grocer. Long distance via train, that makes sense. A centralized rail system, such as subway, in a city also makes sense to cover medium distances. However, we already have the infrastructure to handle medium distances without new expensive rails, that being highways. The cost to fit rails across the entire US would be enormous, and that’s ignoring the long term costs such as staffing and maintenance.

In my small town, we have roughly 125 people. We are, roughly, 35 minutes away from the nearest grocery store, or about 40 miles. Too long to walk or bike in a reasonable time. You could use a motorized bike but the amount of food for a family would be unwieldy. The only viable solution is to drive via car, because you need the trunk space. And both options to get there require roads. Now, let’s suppose we magically replaced highways for rails. What happens is simple: either the government is bleeding immense amounts of money orchestrating train rides to places where no one is regularly using it, or certain less populated areas are underserved.
"Everyone lies one day. Everyone. Even dads. But not on the internet. Not HN. HN won't lie"

– My granpa, 86
It's from this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_rule_for_Camera_File_sy...
I once had a dream to be a writer. I made a tool that was going to help me write every day. The most insightful feedback I got was: "Wow, aspiring writers will do anything to avoid writing!"

I think something similar applies here: you see way more dev tools than successful products because people can't build many successful products using LLMs. Building a devtool (the old-fashioned way) is something that people can tangibly do.
If you're starting a new company, squatters are not a real problem. Just pick another name. If your favorite name is so valuable that it's squatted, then it's valuable! The squatter was reserving it for you, the only company that could really make good use of it, instead of some random personal blogger who happened to walk in first and would wasted its high value.

Also, what's the difference between a squatter and a personal blogger?
A con artist is a kind of artist, right?
With the fairly broad scope of publicity campaigns and pop-sci information about how bats are notorious hosts of rabies, it's surprising that this woman didn't go get checked out right after releasing the bat. I'd assume she'd have noticed being bitten since she was awake and carrying it before releasing it, and that would have been a huge red flag for visiting a doctor, but even if she wasn't sure about a bite, like I said, the publicity around bats and the danger of rabies is huge. Even little kids often know about the connection between the two.

Strange. She had nearly a month to save herself and simply nope.
Automated filtering surely is not across the main competitive advantages of youtube.
Even aside from that, you probably want to register your own .sucks and .rocks, which just means whoever operates that registry gets to make a bunch of money from companies squatting domains that nobody wanted and bring no value to the world.
How very well put.
The AMD driver has been great on my Framework 13, but the 6.10 series was completely busted. 6.11 worked fine. I can't remember a series where any of my Intel laptops didn't work for that long.
And future proof! Made me question my sanity for a moment.

"© 2025 TheTubeComputer.com"
PSA: This will fubar your YouTube watch history / recommendations, you might want to incognito.
Yeah you are right about this, psychological safety is a key ingredient in what “good” looks like. Blameless culture stuff is a bit of another ball of wax, so I didn’t get into it too much.
I agree. First step I think is to start measuring what’s important at the top of the organization. When you have weekly progress meetings with the CTO and CPO and only look at lists of new features, then new features will be what people think about. “What gets measured gets done”, as they say.
Regular search usage can not be automated to millions of requests, API can.
The chart this data comes from (https://ifr.org/downloads/press2018/Teaser_Robot_Density_.jp...) is for employees within the manufacturing industry, not for the economy as a whole.
So we've been in the "late stages" for at least 50 years? Is there any sort of falsifiable hypothesis there?

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=late-stage+cap...

You can see from Google Ngram Viewer that there's almost no usage before the year 2000, and the vast majority of usage is post-2015. My guess would be that recent usage has only a tenuous connection, at best, to scholarly usage from 50+ years ago.
I hit the jackpot: someone recorded Ralph Stanley performing O Death in concert.

I caught him several years ago (on my second attempt: he was supposed to perform at the Grand Ol’ Opry, and I drove 5 hours to see him, but he canceled) but he was clearly running on fumes. Definitely something I wish I’d understood when I was younger: find musical giants and see them live before they’re gone.
The point is not that there's a literal death panel, but instead the healthcare committee trampled over the rights of parents and individuals. If they want to bring their children overseas for treatment, the white coats should get the fuck out of their way. By the logic of the other commenters, "My body my choice" is only for political causes you believe in amirite?
I think the goalposts may have shifted a bit, from why hasn't Intel made such a card to why is Intel not (publicly) working on such a card to be released in a year or two.

In terms of what would have been feasible for Intel to bring to market in 2024, the cheapest option for 128GB capacity would probably have been ~8.5Gb/s LPDDR5x on a 256-bit bus, but to at least match the bandwidth of the chip they just launched, it would have made more sense to use a 512-bit bus and bump the die size back up to ~half the reticle limit like their previous generation die with a 256-bit bus. So they would have had a quite slow but high-capacity GPU with a manufacturing cost equal to at least an RTX 4080, before adding in the cost of all that DRAM. And if they had started working on that chip as soon as LLaMA went public, they might have been able to deliver it by now.

It's no surprise at all that such a risky niche product did not emerge from a division of Intel that is lucky to not have been liquidated yet.
We already make an exception in that we don't support Debian bullseye (which is supported by the rest of QEMU until the April 2025 release), but not supporting Debian stable at all seemed too much.

That said we will probably switch to Debian rustc-web soon, and bump the lower limit to 1.75 or so.
3 year olds literally do not have the brain development for it
Oh yeah, that's not obnoxious at all. :D

Lost on your way to Reddit, I see.
At least I know there's one person that gets it.

I've never ran into such brigading on HN before. I really thought I said something non-confrontational at first.

Wait till they get hit with their first domain renewal sniping attack. Then it's spiderman-pointy-finger meme all day when explaining who hurt who.
I mean it literally. 3 year olds literally do not have the brain development required for empathy and will literally kick you in the head one moment and ask you for a sandwich the next
Isn’t that the same now?

By the way, I dislike the term “compiler compiler”, because that’s not really what it does. I like “parser generator” for tax/bison, and “lexer generator” for flex.
You’re being misled.

Quoting John Emanuel Banuelos, “I’m the one in the video with the gun right here” indicating the moment he fired it into the air twice. Three trials proved guns without so clear a confession.
it's just biological fact, it takes time for the brain to build the areas of empathy
no, it's hardware. this is why sociopaths exist, they lack it
This opinion article lacks appropriate backing for the narrative pushed to be compelling, the data they reference is not included or linked, and the article suggests that non-enforcement of antitrust is the driver for food deserts which started around the 1980s with Reagan, when in fact there were an awful lot of issues going on simultaneously in that time period economically speaking.

It's usually ill-advised to propose a magic bullet when there are many factors at play in the overall economics. I haven't seen any data suggesting the unenforcement (which has no visibility) was more impactful than the S&L crisis (which happened around the same time).

1973 to 1982 Stagflation raged. 1970s took the USD into fiat currency,early 1980s the collapse of Silver occurred due to bad actors cornering markets, certain banks also started being less responsible with whom they loaned to favoring large corporations over independent businesses, and heavy speculation regardless of risk that culminated in the savings and loan crisis affecting many industries, and seemingly following the all too familiar pattern of too-big-to-fail bailout type plans, which were proven to be profitable starting with the Pennsylvania Railroad bankruptcy in 1970 (from what I've seen).

While it is an interesting synopsis, the article completely ignores the other factors instead cherrypicking antitrust, more specifically the Patman Act and unenforcement as the culprit. Economies don't operate in a vacuum. Occam's razor says its more likely to be any number of the crises that happened with the underlying trend being fiat banking, than any other factor that has almost no visibility with a lot of other confounding data. They were chaotic times.
Elixir has two fully functional language servers and it's very far from niche, or I've been spending imaginary money for the last 9 years.

What I said still applies, the guy seems to have a familiarity bias and said nothing to show otherwise.

As for being condescending, your reply seems like a textbook example.
I'll take this as a benefit; an algorithm palate cleanser
Sounds like Broadcom is engaging in some serious enshittification of VMWare. Customers leaving in droves is the appropriate reaction.
move somewhere else
If a 21 century rocketry group takes 20 years to reach the Karman line, college students or not, they are the definition of incompetent. Maybe they should all get internships at the United Launch Alliance; good for lapping out of the gravy train and not much else.
I love that the view count is included in the minimalist UI. I came across one with zero views, and there's something so intimate and exciting about being the first person to watch an ancient home video (even if it's shaky handycam footage of a horse, narrated in Russian).

As an aside, hats off to Google to being able to serve an 11 year old video with no noticeable delay from what must be the coldest of caches.
At the rate it's going, IPv6 should be ready for prime time around the same time we have nuclear fusion power plants and real self-driving cars that don't rely on a human driver.
It's pretty standard practice for all cameras manufacturers to use a basic incremental filename. Many more useful data are embedded in jpeg exif metadata.

On the contrary including a date in the filename could be perceived as user hostile because none of the multiple iso representations (or non iso) is universally used and understood by the general public.

Eg : 20241112, 1112024, 1211024, 131208, 081213 and so on...
I licked PF (phenol formaldehyde) buttons when I was a toddler. I can't forget the fascination with the bitter, tongue-numbing, medicine-like taste that they released when wet.

That shows you geniuses are not born: it's environment, man. Where can I get these buttons today for my children?
Resume padding is a big one
I am from an eastern society, So my first day in western society I saw a blue collar worker clean up his food crumbs on a REWE deli table. This might seem normal to do for you, but I swear I never seen anything like that in my life in the eastern society. I was 27 this had profound impact on me than reading any book, I still remember it after a decade.
Really? That's your only criteria for thinking it's absurd? People need food to live, water too, and also clothing. Is it absolutely insane that all of these cost money?

I'm not defending the insane billing system of the U.S, because it truly is designed to be or at least accidentally off the wall with absurdities, but it's not ridiculous to charge people reasonably for many complex, expensive things that also require hiring specialist assistance. Somewhere down the line, somebody in any case needs to pay for it via money and time.
The person who is you exist independently of any copy of yourself. While a replica of you would exist there would still be the original you manifest in your brain that would exist an independent life and die at some point without ever “resuming” in another body. This is similar to how you can never time travel yourself even through relativity. Your perception of time will be the same no matter what relativistic effects occur outside of your frame of reference. You will live your life span and die.

Your replica however would have a different experience and be able to draw on your memories etc. But you yourself will in fact live a natural life with no shared experience with your replica and will experience death no matter what. It’ll be little solace to you that a copy got to live your life after your passing.
Any collaboration or plans for Gleam support?
dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42307524
A bit more context:

Show HN: If YouTube had actual channels - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41247023 - Sep 2024 (532 comments)
Thanks for the rebuttle.

You are right, I stand corrected - I think both approaches make sense for spreading change.

Yours on an every day basis, the viewpoint I gave requires opportunity, but matters too.

The thing with game theory, is it’s the right way to think of social structures that scale.

I think a lot of people’s behavior responds strongly to their incentives. All those people you (and I) are cynical about.

And ethics really are the positive sum “games”. Keeping one’s word, safety nets, helping our neighbors, win-win transactions and relationships - we adopt them as individuals for the immediate good it does, for us and who we interact with. And knowing if everyone did that we would all be better off. Even the self-isolating rich since society as a whole would run better.

Bottom up or top down encouragement are both with it.
> not sure what you really mean by this one.

The same as what everyone has meant, including the article. The naive solution is to simply write out every nearly the same query you need, but that starts to become difficult to maintain once you have more than a small handful of queries. More realistically you are going to want to introduce composition in a practical setting.

The SQL solution is views, but they are complicated by being dependent on runtime state. There is a lot of complexity involved in ensuring that everything is in the right state. While that may be a decent tradeoff for some applications, the types of applications that lean on these query builders tend to be of the type where they are trying to prove a business hypothesis and whatever gets there the fastest is the tradeoff that needs to be made. A set of functions in the application language that somewhat resemble SQL, which output a SQL query, are a lot easier to implement.

The alternative is to compose queries at "compile time". In the simplest case you might get away with string concatenation, but this too quickly becomes error prone at scale. While many languages of this nature are designed such that all concatenations are valid for this very reason, SQL is not. An innocuous and perfectly valid modification to a query can easily invalidate what was a previously valid concatenation. More realistically you are going to want to build an AST so that properties can be modified without reliance on exacting syntax. You can parse SQL to give you that AST, or you can go back to the aforementioned set of functions to generate the AST. The latter is considerably easier to implement.

Each approach has pluses and minus. As with anything, you have to pick your tradeoffs. But it is no surprise that a lot of developers choose the easy tradeoff, especially when a lot of those developers are developing systems where what is easy/fast is the most important tradeoff, not knowing if what they are writing will ever get used. Theoretical engineering perfection is moot if there is no customer to use the product of that engineering.
> I want a scientific mission to mars I hope doing so pushes science and engineering know how forward.

I encourage you to implement this mission. No one is stopping you. I hope you succeed.

> Going to mars on a larger scale is presently nonsense

The history of humanity at every scale is men saying "x project is nonsense" while other men do stuff (I recall my grandfather telling me how he was told that building a 5 acre dairy farm in the middle of nowhere, with no roads and no technology was impossible and would bankrupt him. That farm eventually scaled up to a "larger scale" that he was assured was impossible).

You really are terribly boring, or terribly young, or both. Sad.

Here's the thing: you bore me. I feel no inclination to engage with your dull diatribe. I'm the wrong audience for you, and you're a waste of my time, as I am a waste of yours.

So, find someone who cares about or agrees with what you're saying and you'll have a more productive debate, I promise.

> Let's start with how a large scale colony is going to be viable and earn money.

Here's thing. If you answer the questions you raise, you win the prize at the next frontier. That's what innovation is about. You can be given infinite amounts of money anywhere in the world if you present solutions to questions that other men can't figure out. That's the game.

But you don't actually want to answer the questions: "how do we colonize Mars", "how do we build a 1M person base on the moon?" You want to moralize about your low expectations and treat your lack of imagination as a virtue. I categorically refuse to play that game. But good luck.
I build internal web applications for companies in the transport industry, and I have considered to try out Phoenix LiveView for my next project ( I have never used Phoenix or Elixir). Everyone praises the DX but I'm conserned about the requirement of constant internet connection. What happens if a user enters a tunnel where there are no connection? Will the app just crash or are there ways to handle this better somehow?
Show HN: Job Board for Aircraft Mechanics
This is exactly how I feel about my programming work in this credentialist United States. I will keep programming, in spite of the haters -- who will stop me?
The business case is that networks are getting better but NAT hardware isn't keeping up. Dual-stack users are increasingly likely to have a good v6 connection and very marginal v4, and just abandoning v4 support entirely lets you stop caring about that.

It hasn’t arrived yet but the trend is there and the cutoff point exists.

It's not enough to be dual-stack, happy eyeballs only really handles the broken v6/good v4 case and is too eager to fall back to a broken but minimally functional v4. You have to run v6-only services to not pay the NAT tax.
In my experience, the more desperate the retailers, the better the Black Friday deals and the more I buy. This year the deals were awful, and the only thing I bought was an Atari VCS All-In Bundle for $80.

If this holds up for customers in general, then I guess it's a sign the economy is doing okay.
> Does M4 Max have 64-byte cache lines?

on the CPU side: 64 bytes at L1, 128 byte cachelines at L2
Training is close to traditional HPC in many ways. Inference is far simpler since it's a simple forward-going pipeline of a relatively small working set.
It's true but I don't run into this issue often since most games and Windows will offer UI/Menu scaling without changing individual windows or the game itself.
> But nevertheless the laws are structured so that everyone realistically must buy a car, whether they want to or not.

Do you mean lack of government subsidies supporting better public transportation? Or something else?