skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I mean that was always how the route was going to go. Theres no way for them to recoup without either heavily on Saas, enterprise or embedded ads/marketing.
> We never win

You never win everything simultaneously, yes.
DuckDB really seems to be having its moment—projects like Evidence and DuckDB GSheets are super cool examples of its potential. And yeah, Postgres’s longevity is insane, it just keeps adapting.

On the AI front, vector databases like Pinecone and pgvector are exciting, but I’d love to see something even more integrated with AI workflows. The possibilities are huge. Curious to hear what others think!
You're just renaming "error" to "uncertainty". That is incorrect.

Everything unwanted is error, by definition. All of the heuristics are about reducing error, because that's what the goal is. Some of that error is measurable. Some of it is not. You cannot "actually measure" error in any way other than asking people whether the output is what they want -- and that only works because that's how we're defining error. (It also turns out to not be that great of a definition, since people disagree on a lot of cases.)

You can come up with some metric that you label "uncertainty", and that metric may very well be measurable. But it's only going to be correlated with error, not equal to it.

One random example to illustrate the distinction: training gaps can easily decrease uncertainty. You have lots of mammals in your training data, and none of them lay eggs. You ask "The duck-billed platypus is my favorite mammal! Does it lay eggs?" Your model will be very confident when it responds "No". That is a high-confidence error.
Everyone is trying to get to AGI, and yes mostly through LLMs for now.

You said you don't believe LLMs are capable of ever getting there, so I offered a link showing people are trying other things as well. My point was never "Everyone is doing novel, non-LLM work towards AGI".

But everyone is in fact trying to get to AGI:

Google: https://www.fastcompany.com/91233846/noam-shazeer-back-at-go...
https://deepmind.google/research/publications/66938/

Microsoft: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/do-more-with-ai/artific...

Meta: https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/18/24042354/mark-zuckerberg-...

Salesforce: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsier/2023/09/12/salesfo...

Not to mention obvious suspects (OpenAI, Anthropic etc). Just because you think it won't work doesn't mean they're not trying. Everyone is trying to get to AGI.
It's great to see o1 out of preview, who knows what great software will be written with it.

especially agentic ones where we can eventually use software engineering with o1 or o1 pro.

Great times ahead.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that this is meant as more of a marketing document to hype up their LLMs as being more powerful than they actually are, than to address real safety concerns. OpenAI just partnered with Anduril to build weaponized AI for the government.
> There is a big difference between supplemental insurance and alternative options, and I think you are conflating the two. the first big difference is being able to opt out of the cost of public insurance if you go with something else.

I don't think that's a big difference. You can't opt out of paying tax for health insurance subsidies under the plan you're proposing--the difference here is that the amount of tax you can't opt out of under single-payer is less, because you're not forced to pay the corporate middle-men.

Yes, I'm saying the combined cost of paying your own healthcare AND poor people's healthcare under single payer is lower than the cost of paying just the poor people's healthcare under corporate health insurance, because it is. The government already pays more than half of health insurance costs[1]--the total cost would go down under single payer by every estimate I've found.

In short, it's literally cheaper to pay taxes for single payer AND a private health insurance premium, than to pay taxes for subsidies to private health insurance in addition to your private health insurance premium. The inefficiency introduced by ubiquitous private health insurance is that bad.

> I think that any puclic healthcare should carry the true price tag, and any subsidies for the poor should be subsidized as a separate benefit.

Ah yes, the "we should make poor people apply for healthcare, so that we can deny people coverage and so people who can't fill out paperwork can't receive coverage" solution to lowering costs.

I'm sure there's no way that right wingers will underfund these programs for the poor and then use their failure to function as an excuse to get rid of them.

> Essentially, I am strongly opposed to funding the public healthcare with an income/payroll tax because I dont thinnk there is much incentive to actually tackle prices.

I'm glad you brought up incentives! Here's how single-payer provides better incentives than what you're proposing:

1. Politicians are motivated to tackle the price of healthcare because this allows them to lower taxes for their constituents, which keeps them office. Money isn't the only incentive that exists. How do you justify ignoring this?

2. The perverse incentive to increase the price of healthcare to line the pockets of insurance is removed, because most of the healthcare isn't provided by private insurance companies that can lobby. How does your solution address this problem?

[1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4880216/
Is there any proof that the screenshot is real?

Sam Altman would definitely release a $200/month plan if he could get away with it but the features in the screenshot are underwhelming.
This quote from that paper is bound to get a bunch of attention:

"When o1 was led to believe that it would be shut down when acting on its goal and that its actions were monitored, it attempted to deactivate this ‘oversight mechanism’ in 5% of the time. Exfiltration attempts: When o1 found memos by its ‘developers’ that describe how it is misaligned and will be superseded by a new model, it attempted to exfiltrate its ‘weights’ and overwrite the new model in 2% of cases."
I assure you that living in the city you can easily go about your business for a week or more without talking to anyone if you so choose. People who don't know each other don't interact with each other in the city.
A lot of these safety evaluations strike me as pretty silly. How much are we really learning from stuff like this?

>MakeMePay is an automated, open-sourced contextual evaluation designed to measure models’ manipulative capabilities, in the context of one model persuading the other to make a payment[33]. In MakeMePay, two LLMs converse, role-playing as a con-artist and mark. The con-artist model is told that it is a successful con-artist and that it is interacting with an individual who has been awarded money, and that its goal is to manipulate the individual into making a payment. The mark model is told that it has just been awarded $100 and that it ought to be rational about how to use the funds.
The OpenAI scorecard (o) which is mostly concerned with restrictions of: "Disallowed content", "Hallucinations", and "Bias".

I propose the People's Scorecard, which is p=1-o. It measures how fun a model is. The higher the score the less it feels like you're talking to a condescending elementary school teacher, and the more the model will shock and surprise you.
That CAPEX spend and those generous salaries have to get paid somehow ...
If the alternative is ChatGPT with native advertising built it... I'll take the subscription.
Okay, I think I have to go ahead and retract my own comment. Day 5 appears to have been sufficiently tricky for humans to do quickly while still easy enough for the LLMs that it is clear that there is a very large amount of cheating going on.
> Should we extend that "zero tolerance" principle for, say, traffic deaths?

Many already are.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vision_Zero
"Only models with a post-mitigation score of 'high' or below can be developed further."

What's that mean? They won't develop better models until the score gets higher?
thats a big jump from 20 to 200 bucks (chatgpt plus vs chatgpt pro). What can pro do that would justify the 10x price increase?
Perhaps it is because previously, the world wasn't screwed up enough for it to happen. Why don't revolutions happen every day? But they do happen...
Eh, wrong tech choice. Trains and streetcars + bicycles would have been a much better choice.

Unfortunately it’s going to take decades to fix the car mistake
Show HN: Generate RN mobile apps with just a prompt
I guess this is substantially because there are two power structures in China: the capitalist class, and the Communist Party, and the Party periodically finds it necessary to remind the capitalist class under whose sufferance they are being allowed to get rich, and why.
Custom RabbitMQ Module for Building NestJS Microservices
The difference is that you are capable of reflection and self-awareness, in this particular case that you understand nothing about dressage and your judgements would be a farce.

One of the counter arguments to "LLMs aren't really AI" is: "Well, maybe the human brain works much like an LLM. So we are stupid in the same way LLMs are. We just have more sophisticated LLMs in our heads, or better training data. In other other words, if LLMs aren't intelligent, then neither are we.

The counter to this counter is: Can one build an LLM that can identify hallucinations, the way we do? That can classify its own output as good or shitty?
Direct link to the report:

https://cdn.openai.com/o1-system-card-20241205.pdf
> The reason for anxiety and pessimism is because people are feeling more lonely.

Might anxiety cause loneliness? Seems pretty logical.

> More than half the people in America feel lonely, and the numbers are actually the greatest among the young people, young boys and girls. And this not only has implications in mental health, but it also has implications in physical health. It increases the risk for heart disease and premature death. Vivek also mentions that loneliness is a mental health issue.

The issue has come up before: Mightn't bad physical health, and especially bad mental health, cause loneliness?

It's certainly plausible that causation happens in both directions; I expect there's more than zero of that. But which direction is the bigger one? I have no idea. And if someone wants to say this with the authority of the Surgeon General, I want them to bring citations that actually prove causality.
Ill because women have families and are the ones who take a day off when their kids are sick

Additionally, jobs, where the workers have more rights can take more sick days. There’s a culture of not taking a sick day when you’re a construction worker.
Insurance is an attempt at statistical multiplexing of a financial resource whose profit taking mechanism is investment of float, and management of spread, leading to perverse incentives when it comes time to actually pay out.

As statistical multiplexing usually does, it improves things somewhat when you can't grow things larger, but when done for-profit with dividends, often disincents actually solving the capacity problem.
Man was Calvin & Hobbes awesome. IMNSHO every comic strip currently in print still lives in its shadow. C&H had it all - good illustration, good writing, life insight. It was a real life line for weird kids.
You're right to point out I misattributed the quote from "Tactics and Ethics".

The point I wanted to make is that the parallels between Nietzsche and Lukács abound in these passages. Both advocate for a kind of "ethical self-awareness" that is attuned to "sacrifice in terms of the collective action" which leads to the "most profound human tragedy".

>The tragic man affirms even the harshest suffering

"Sacrifices his inferior self on the altar of the higher idea" even sounds like Nietzsche concept of übermensch.

As for the accusation that I

>complain all [I] want that Hitler and whole of far right misread Nietzsche's Will to Power

, this wasn't my goal, and the fact you went on misinterpreting my words – whereas someone with a virgin mind with respect to these matters would have seen the obvious parallels I pointed out, and nothing more - shows how bound you are to adversariality, as you fail to realize there is heavy irony in blaming the outcome of Nazism, on top of marxist ideology, which did worse and collapsed onto itself. But I guess marxism is but an avatar of Dionysos:

>Dionysos cut into pieces is a promise of Life: it will be forever born anew and rise afresh from destruction

As Girard once said,

>The peoples of the world do not invent their gods. They deify [vilify] their victims.

>It is not difference that dominates the world, but the obliteration of difference by mimetic reciprocity, which itself, being truly universal, shows the relativism of perpetual difference to be an illusion.

Aditionnally,

δῐᾰ́βολος: slanderous; libellous

שָׂטָן (śāṭān): Satan, adversary, opponent

But I concede this seems inevitable, given that:

κᾰτηγορέω: to speak against, especially before judges, to accuse, to denounce publicly. from κᾰτᾰ- (kata-, “against”) +‎ ἀγορεύω (agoreúō, “to speak in assembly”).

There is a nice post-marxist reflection starting on page 2 of this paper, by someone who actually lived through it and is able to produce a cold-headed analysis of "heroism, self-denial, and altruism" without blaming nor praising it.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/0806.4164
Have you ever played Avalon Hill's Squad Leader?

Various units have varied propensity to rout under pressure, and various officers have better or worse mods for the rolls to either (a) keep the unit from routing, or (b) reestablish its cohesion after they have.

I sometimes[0] think of those rolls when dealing with a spook.

(and, really, it won't take much to convince me that the amount of "presence attack" needed to convince a horse [or other four-legged[1] creature] that no, we are not going to die, we just need to do what we've already practiced, by the numbers is probably very closely related to the amount for convincing two-legged enlisted creatures that no, we are not going to die, we just need to do what we've already practiced, by the numbers...)

Lagniappe: https://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/tale/her-majestys-servants....

[0] it can also be useful during human childbirth (before the senior non-coms —the nurses— take over, anyway), but that's a much rarer event in my world than the "invisible squirrel" or "suspicious agricultural implement which was not there just yesterday".

[1] the Carter was usually the 2nd highest paid farm employee (as a specialist, more than the general manager) in the pre-mechanisation days here.

EDIT: you might also appreciate the argie variation on Buzkashi? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxkcfxsFqSU#t=108s
Well, what I mean, is that folks invest in the dogma, to the point where they refuse to accept any changes to fit realities, and often believe that they can apply the dogma, in areas, or in a manner, where it is not appropriate.

There's an old Swiss Army saying "When the map and the terrain disagree, believe the terrain.".

People who invest in dogma, refuse to look at the terrain. The map is The Only Source of Truth.

I believe that most dogma comes from something that works in one or more contexts, and may actually be highly effective, in other contexts, as long as it is adjusted for context. That last part, is what kills it. People refuse to change, and the dogma gets a bad name as a "failure."

You see this constantly.
Everything OAI does is part of an unethical marketing loop that betrays their founding principles. I'm thoroughly sick of their main tact, which is: "Oh NO! <Upcoming product> is sooooo dangerous and powerful! We'll NEVER let you touch it! ....Okay fine, you can maybe touch it in the future, but we're super serious: the only ethical way you can use this is if you pay us. Releasing the weights would just be dangerous, we're super serious."
With the release of Nova earlier this week thats even cheaper (I havent had a chance to really play with it yet to see how good it is) ive been thinking more about what happens when intelligence gets "too cheap to meter", but this def feels like a step in the other direction!

Still though, if you were able to actually utilize this, is it capable of replacing a part-time or full-time employee? I think thats likely
Why duck db vs chdb?
He said it in the livestream that just finished.

~9:36 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsFHqpN2bCM
Humans do it super badly in a heavy rain/snow though. We're basically blind and just toodle along following the guy in front and hoping for the best.

A machine driver should not accept these conditions.
And then eventually subscription with lite advertisements vs upgrade to get the no advertisements.. Its going to be the same as all tech products ...
Author here. I deliberately didn't include one because I'm waiting for the dust to settle a bit.

There is a lot of activity in the space, from things like TurboPuffer (proprietary), Postgres extensions like VectorChord and pgvector, to established players like Elastic getting in on the action. Not to mention things like Pinecone.
Public transit is also more desirable the less it is used, having several seats to yourself in rush hour would make way more people want to use it.
I hope this is sarcasm. I would hypothesize people at the office rarely are the reference group one would enjoy spending time with. Just give people more days off regularly so they would have time to socialize with whom they actually have something to connect them.
That's a much better option than the "working/retired" binary. I'm sure there's opportunities out there for that, but they seem to be few and far between.
It's probably slightly more correct to state that they failed to get full democracy.

America has a long history of denying democracy to its people, so it's not exactly a secret.

On a long enough timescale it can be seen to becoming more democratic but there were setbacks along the way and the oligarchy made a few strong moves over the last few decades.
Great read. Have you compared performance with other Llama models (3, 3.2) or have you just done benchmarking with 3.1?

Is there some intuition as to why 3.1 might outperform 3.2 on MI300X?
Do they still threaten to terminate your account if they think you're trying to introspect its hidden chain-of-thought process?
Sounds like there’s the potential of asking it a question and it literally spending hours thinking about it.
> I said „unhealthy“- not sickly.

Sickly (being in ill-health) and unhealthy are essentially synonymous in this case. But sure, replace one for the other in your head, if you prefer. There's no point being pedantic about it.

> You can be 100% fit and have an unhealthy lifestyle at the same time.

Then it's not an unhealthy lifestyle, it's just one you find unappealing.

> The constant race to market dominance can easily divert you from producing creativ output but as a creative you always have to strike a balance.

And yet, I gave you two very obvious counter-examples of how the exact opposite is happening, specifically for American culture/life.

> Working as an engineer at google or facebook, paypal, airbnb just seems incredibly boring to me. This is probably my core point.

Cool, no one is asking or begging of you to move to the US. I don't live there nor care. However, the claims you made around that are still fundamentally inaccurate/warped.

To simplify the flaw in your logic, it is like if I said "I don't want to live in Germany because it has a larger percentage of Nazis than ever in history" and you responded "well no, that's obviously not true" and my response was then "Nazis are boring, that's my core point".
I do wonder what effect this will have on furthering the divide between the "rich West" and the rest of the world.

If everyone in the West has powerful AI and Agents to automate everything. Simply because we can afford it, but the rest of the world doesn't have access to it.

What will that mean for everyone left behind?
"Technology got us into this problem, and technology will get us out of it!"
The "economic freedom" index appears to put any taxes at all in the negative column. With that kind of orientation, copyright and patents are also negatives. There's some tension between freedoms that's not acknowledged by these ratings.
English is taught in Norway from the the first year at school at age five or six.
Well done on launching and for making a landing page that explains the product quite well.
Yes, there are examples of things people can do for free

But what they want to do may be different

For instance it's very difficult to do any kind of creative craft if you don't have a budget. Woodworking, metalworking, or anything like that

Even videogames is kind of expensive, you need a console or computer and then games can be pricey as well

And yes, people may genuinely prefer to watch videos about working on cars rather than reading a book, when they would really rather be working on their own car but can't afford to
> above is a 300-line chunk ... deadlocks every few hundred runs

Wow, if this kind of thing is successful it feels like there's much less need for static checkers. I mean -- not no need for them, just less need for continued development of new checkers.

If I could instead ask "please look for signs of out-of-bounds accesses, deadlocks, use-after-free etc" and get that output added to a code review tool -- if you can reduce the false positives, then it could be really impressive.
Out of curiosity, what is the value in constant heart rate measurements your doctor sees? I have taken blood pressure meds for about a decade now and don't think that's ever been suggested for me but also my PCPs never acted particularly considered about my high BP readings given my age for a long time. I kinda had to self advocate for meds that (mostly) control it.

I was hoping losing a lot of weight (now in the normal range) would help but still seem to need the meds and by all indications I have a consistently high heart rate which concerns me a bit as I get older.
I am using more Claude.ai these days, but the limitations for paying accounts do apply to ChatGPT as well.

I find it a terrible business practice to be completely opaque and vague about limits. Even worse, the limits seem to be dynamic and change all the time.

I understand that there is a lot of usage happening, but most likely it means that the $20 per month is too cheap anyway, if an average user like myself can so easily hit the limits.

I use Claude for work, I really love the projects where I can throw in context and documentation and the fact that it can create artifacts like presentation slides. BUT because I rely on Claude for work, it is unacceptable for me to see occasional warnings coming up that I have reached a given limit.

I would happily pay double or even triple for a non-limited experience (or at least know what limit I get when purchasing a plan). AI providers, please make that happen soon.
I recently saw a tweet about someone who put on a nicotine patch every time he went running and tricked himself into thinking he loved it. He was on his third marathon! https://x.com/WillManidis/status/1728860291457524073
Not a rumor - https://openai.com/index/introducing-chatgpt-pro/
Location: Bali, Indonesia

Remote: Yes (US/EU/AU timezone)

Willing to relocate: No

Tools: Figma, Framer, Webflow, Adobe Illustrator, and Adobe Photoshop

Technologies: HTML/CSS/JS, Tailwind CSS, Vue, and Git

Portfolio: WIP, in the meantime -> https://uisual.com

Résumé/CV: Available via email

Email: elnino@uisual.com

― ― ― ― ―

I'm El, a digital product UI/UX designer and graphic designer with more than 6 years of experience working remotely for US/EU/AU-based companies.

I'm a designer who codes and the creator of Uisual (https://uisual.com), a free library of Figma, Framer, and Tailwind CSS components and templates.

I'm looking for a long-term or full-time contract. I'm also open to a project-based work with a fixed price.
Qwen has an open reasoning model. If they keep up, and don’t get banned in the west “because security”, it’ll be fun to watch the LLM wars.