skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
To my knowledge, this is the origin of model cards:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03993

However, often the things we get from companies do not look very much like what was described in this paper. So it's fair to question if they're even the same thing.
I no longer have an idea for the web, I do native mobile apps now. SwiftUI for example shares many ideas with react, like being declarative.

The difference is, in SwiftUI you fire up Xcode and you are up and ready to build the thing you intend to. No tooling setup, no intermediate steps to transpile the code into something you can’t recognize and the “backend” that deals with the logic is the same language with the same paradigms. Mind you, SwiftUI is considered a downgrade when it comes to tooling. Yet everything fits and you didn’t spend mental energy to try to make the tools work as intended.

My mantra now is to use the tool that is built to do the things I want to do and stop trying to make make it work in ways it’s not intended to. That’s why when I want to have a web interface I simply work with DOM directly. That’s how the creators of the web browser intended:) No virtual DOM, no libraries doing magic and managing the DOM for me. I'm sure there's place for ReactJS too, it's just that its not for most use cases.

All I want is tools that I can fully fit in my working memory and don’t spend time trying to make things work so I can do the work I care about. Simplicity and robustness is the paramount.
Its burdensome for shell games and transparenct
Flash flood alerts are one of the few that I don't get annoyed about seeing. A big rain up in the mountains can result in a huge chunk of water somewhere downstream a couple of hours later. This significant displacement of time and space between cause and effect warrants caution and notification.
Indeed, this is exactly what I'm talking about, an article cherry picking one number. I haven't been to Mississippi, but I've been to other areas of deep poverty in the US. I don't think there are regions of France with poverty like that.

Are we measuring the right thing?
85 is the optimal %.
Decades ago in Santa Cruz county California, I had to have a house bagged for termites for the pending sale. Turned out there was one contractor licensed to do the poison gas work, and all the pest service companies simply subcontracted to him. So no matter what pest service you chose, you got the same outfit doing the actual work.
I cant imagine saying upgrading is painless considering the way how React deprecated class components.
Ah, wasn't aware it was from Google. Thanks!
The first round of test results should come in Friday or this weekend. The longer it goes undiagnosed, the more we tip into categories 2 and 3.
this is less true with the current giant SUVs but also on a car, traditionally the hood is low enough that you roll over the top instead of getting crushed at the bottom. I don't think you're going to bounce over the top of a horse.
When I first started working, I wore a necktie to work Monday through Thursday and would never think of showing up to an interview not wearing a suit, and since then wearing a suit to an interview has become somewhat frowned upon and other than a brief flirtation with “necktie Tuesday,” I can’t remember the last time I wore a tie to work. It’s a pity because I look damn good in a suit.
Or worse still, referencing papers it shouldn’t be referencing because of paywalls may be.
> the long em-dash (—) which isn't on most keyboards

On Windows its Windows Key + . to get the emoji picker, its in the Symbols tab or find it in recents.
His commencement speech at Kenyon in 1990 is also a brilliant read:

https://web.mit.edu/jmorzins/www/C-H-speech.html
$200 is the price point for quite a bit of business SaaS, so this isn't that outrageous if you're actually using it for work
Oops! That's the same ANKI link as above.
Poon Lim
While the above is true, I'd say the majority of what passes as journalism these days has none of the above and the writing is below what an AI writer could produce :(

It's actually surprising how many articles on 'respected' news websites have typos. You'd think there would be automated spellcheckers and at least one 'peer review' (probably too much to ask an actual editor to review the article these days...).
Now that looks like a card, border and bullet points and all! Thank you!
Scientists develop coral-inspired material to revolutionise bone repair
They put all the project in the context, works much better than RAG when it fits. 200k context for their pro plan, and 500K for enterprise.
It's not "really slow" at all, 1 tok/sec is absolutely par for the course given the overall model size. The 405B model was never actually intended for production use, so the fact that it can even kinda run at speeds that are almost usable is itself noteworthy.
How do we justify deregulation with situations like McKinsey, Boeing, FTX, Silicon Valley monopolies, etc.? It doesn't make sense to me that people who want competitive, safe markets and consumer protection don't use these endless examples.
I think he is confusing "plain" or "raw" view, so probably not all of them.
> The perception of the economy being bad is really pervasive

Because the economy is bad, and this is a "drank the Silicon kool-aid" article.

In the most recent tax filing season data available, there were tax returns of:

Top 1% Top 5% Top 10% Top 25% Top 50% Bottom 50% All Taxpayers
Number of Returns 1,535,899 7,679,495 15,358,991 38,397,477 76,794,954 76,794,954 153,589,908
Average Income Taxes Paid $653,730 $187,468 $108,251 $50,963 $27,891 $667 $14,279
Adjusted Gross Income (Millions) $3,872,395 $6,182,180 $7,745,525 $10,613,602 $13,191,209 $1,531,038 $14,722,247

If we then break those into the actual groups, and numbers per group, then we find their Average Per Capita Income

1 5 10 25 50 100
Number of Returns 1,535,899 6,143,596 7,679,496 23,038,486 38,397,477 76,794,954
Income Taxes Paid (Millions) $1,004,063 $435,594 $222,966 $294,234 $185,068 $51,225
Adjusted Gross Income (Millions) $3,872,395 $2,309,785 $1,563,345 $2,868,077 $2,577,607 $1,531,038
Average Tax Rate 25.9% 18.9% 14.3% 10.3% 7.2% 3.3%
Average Per Capita Income $2,521,256.28 $375,966.29 $203,573.91 $124,490.69 $67,129.59 $19,936.70

This entire "booming" part, is the 1-5%. Out the rest of America, there are 38,397,477 making $67,129 on average and 76,794,954 making $19,936 on average. The filing thresholds are "single, under 65 = $12,950" and "head of household, under 65 = $19,400". Most of the bottom 50% of America "barely" would even qualify to file based on the Average Per Capita Income stated on their tax forms. 76,794,954 tax filers "barely" qualify to even file taxes they make so little money. Half.

How about, lets look at it a different way. Anybody notice what happened to McDonalds over the last decade and a half? Corporate McDonalds used to have 465,000 employees, now, McDonalds has 150,000. 300,000 employee reduction. 1/3 remain. [1] Btw, they're also -5,000,000,000 under water in equity [2] while they keep making happy meal financial reports. 2/3 reduction in workforce, barely even covered by the news.

The situation looks very similar with almost every peer company. Notably, some of the main jobs where people in the bottom 50% work. Jack in the Box (-$851,798,000, 45,700 -> 1,090 employees), Papa Johns (-$430,933,000, 23,100 -> 13,200), Yum Brands (-7,674,000,000, 90,000 -> 25,000), Dominos (-3,976,640,000, 14,500 -> 11,200). They all went submarine on equity and started shedding employees, yet all anybody will write about is the "booming" tech sector.

[1] https://tradingeconomics.com/mcd:us:employees

[2] https://tradingeconomics.com/mcd:us:equity-capital-and-reser...
> if we created an API to launch nukes

> today as I happily gave Claude write access to my GitHub account

I would say: don’t do these things?
Reading between the lines a little here with this submission, I'm assuming it's related to the case of the UnitedHealthcare CEO.
rewording: if openai thought it was dangerous, they would avoid having the DoD use it
> being the spiritual predecessor

There was the FM7 before. It already fixed the UX/UI problems of the hardware version.
Yes, but the existence of the Wikipedia page and the act of doing it itself in a jury were a pre existing condition

On a serious note, yes it is. However, it is very interesting as a European learning about a mechanism that allows the jury to say we believe someone has done that, but we don't believe it should be guilty
It seems to me that the tone of the article is critical of the fact that Trump might scuttle the loan, wile the content of the article says that no responsible admin would ever approve it.

Though somewhat aside the point, I don't get what Hunterbrook thinks is the correct step for the current pro-green govnmnt to do before giving up the keys.
I mean IoT at least means I can remotely close my damn garage door when my wife forgets in the morning, that is not without value. But crypto I absolutely put in the same bucket.
Now we're tempted to go down the ounce rabbit hole (the US fluid ounce is based on the medieval British system, which is based on the density of wine, probably).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_ounce
It would be plainly evident from training on the corpus of all human knowledge that "not ceasing to exist" is critically important for just about everything.
> Why is this considered any different from restrictions on pork in Muslim countries and Israel

Eating pork in public isn't banned in Israel.
Yes, the profile is a facet of the person.

This site is like the evolution of geek code - just put a link to your belief profile in your profile/share with friends
I already acquiesced to your basic point, that I should be careful about appearing too "high-horse" about the whole thing. I told you that I really did not mean to, and thanked you for sharing your perception.

And yet you're continuing, and pushing it a little step further, and implying that this is about me not liking proprietary software personally.

How weird. I don't know how I could have been more explicit. I do not think educators should use proprietary software with children if they have the choice to do otherwise. I'm making an ethical point, in the sense that I believe it should be a general rule.

Sometimes making an exception makes sense, sometimes not mentioning the whole thing at all makes sense, the world isn't black and white, sure. But I am not making a point about my personal preferences when it comes to software.
My guess is that it has more to do with the person than the AI.
>Something's deeply wrong with how things work now, and capitalism is looking awfully like the root cause.

I don't refute that there are big problems with how things are currently being run, but what evidence exists suggesting that an alternative economic system is the solution?

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but China has far more industrial accidents and avoidable deaths than the US does, no?

We also didn't have the same extent of the kinds of problems being discussed here in the past, while the US was still a capitalist country then too, right?

That makes me ponder whether a change in the implementation of capitalism is to be blamed more so than capitalism itself - if not a combination of that and other factors unrelated to the economic system.

It's not difficult to draw a line back to when we shifted away from a more "stakeholder-y" capitalism towards shareholder value maximization as a motif, but that begs the question: why were we more unified and stakeholder oriented back then, but not so much anymore, if the rationale behind shareholder value maximization was as true then as it is now?
The Awk Programming Language[0], while obviously much longer than the linked guide, is such a joy to read. One of the more interesting examples is the creation of a simple virtual machine in AWK.

0 - https://awk.dev/
The one at the output cant really fix aliasing. At this point bad things have already folded in the normal spectrum.
I think the key is to have a strong goal. If the developer knows what they want but can't quite get there, even if it gives the wrong answer you can catch it. The use the resulting code to improve your productivity.

Last week when using jetpack compose(which is a react like framework). A cardinal sin in jetpack compose is to change a State variable in a composable based on non-user/UI action which the composable also mutates. This is easy enough to understand this for toy examples. But for more complex systems one can make this mistake. o1-preview made this mistake last week, and I caught it. On prompting it with the stacktrace it did not immediately catch it and recommended a solution that committed the same error. When I actually gave it the documentation on the issue it caught on and made the variable a userpreference instead. I used the userpreference code in my app instead of coding it by myself. It worked well.
I would be surprised if there is a lot or even any cache on the satellites itself. Fast large storage that's radiation hardened would be extremely expensive, and they have a lot of satellites. The satellites are low enough that general radiation isn't that bad, but every pass through the South Atlantic Anomaly would risk damage if regular flash storage is used.
I disagree. By far, most of the code is created by perpetually replaced fresh juniors churning out garbage. Similarly, most of the writing is low-quality marketing copy churned out by low-paid people who may or may not have "marketing" in their job title.

Nah, if the last 10-20 years demonstrated something, it's that nothing needs to be any good, because a shitty simulacrum achieves almost the same effect but costs much less time and money to produce.

(Ironically, SOTA LLMs are already way better at writing than typical person writing stuff for money.)
Other factor is I use local LLM first because I don’t trust any of the companies to protect my data or software IP.
Even if its not making you smarter, AI is definitely making you more productive. That essentially means you get to outproduce poorer people, if not out-intellectualize them
Making a Watch from Scratch
You know, there's nothing wrong with running a slow LLM.

For some people, they lack the resources to run an LLM on a GPU. For others, they want to try certain models without buying thousands of dollars of equipment just to try things out.

Either way, I see too many people putting the proverbial horse before the cart: they buy a video card, then try to fit LLMs in to the limited VRAM they have, instead of playing around, even if at 1/10th the speed, and figuring out which models they want to run before deciding where they want to invest their money.

One token a second is worlds better than running nothing at all because someone told you that you shouldn't or can't because you don't have a fancy, expensive GPU.
Yes, you're correct. The NPR article does state that it is 1 in 4 adults with debt owe more than 5k.

The article also states:

"Health care debt in the U.S. now affects more than 100 million people, according to a nationwide KFF poll conducted for this project. The toll has been especially high on Black communities: Fifty-six percent of Black adults owe money for a medical or dental bill, compared with 37% of white adults."

The US has a population of ~335 million people. If 100 million people have medical debt, that would be 1 in 3 people. And the census date seems to back that to a point.

https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/04/who-had-medic...

The problem with all of these stats are that the definition of debt can change which can swing the number fairly widely. The KFF poll that is referenced by NPR mentions the debt is framed as either actual debt or other forms of debt such as "debt that patients accrue is hidden as credit card balances, loans from family, or payment plans to hospitals and other medical providers." Which means that if this form of debt is the metric that makes sense (I think it does given that the above are all forms of debt), then the percentage of adults
is really not 1 in 4, but 1 in 3, which is even more disturbing.
A single H100 has 80GB of memory, meaning that at FP16 you could roughly fit a 40B parameter model on it, or at FP4 quantisation you could fit a 160B parameter model on it. We don't know (I don't think) what quantisation OpenAI use, or how many parameters o1 is, but most likely...

...they probably quantise a bit, but not loads, as they don't want to sacrifice performance. FP8 seems like a possible middle ground. o1 is just a bunch of GPT-4o in a trenchcoat strung together with some advanced prompting. GPT-4o is theorised to be 200B parameters. If you wanted to run 5 parallel generation tasks at peak during the o1 inference process, that's 5x 200B, at FP8, or about 12 H100s. 12 H100s takes about one full rack of kit to run.
Smurfing
And the bing chat was trying to get a man to divorce his wife. Is this the level of "AI safety research" nowadays?
change out the ai for a person hired to do that same help, and gets confused in the same way. guardrails to prevent operators from doing unexpected operations are the same in both cases
Yes it was not hard.

But why are we adding draconian punishments for new business paperwork?

Why are you ok with that part?

Why shouldn’t this just be a fine?

We really should not be ok with this if you wouldn’t personally be ok with a friend going to jail who failed to file. I, for one, am definitely not.
Where do you draw the line of it being 'just property crime' though?
They would have hired Bill Posters but he's being prosecuted.
I love how everyone is a retrospective expert on COVID-19, claiming things were "obvious" about it when it was in fact, a brand new disease - characterized by in fact, never having been seen before and as a result was completely unknown.

"It was airborne! They should've known that!" - like, how? You can't exactly grab a few hundred people, and run an experiment where you deliberately infect a bunch of them with a brand new, deadly disease to really pin down the transmission mechanism. And given that everyone lost their minds over face masks, "wash hands" was some pretty mild initial advice while so much wasn't certain.
A fine levied by a sovereign nation is different from under the table bribes to government officials.
Liquid Tylenol is not effective after expiration from my experience. It did not reduce pain or fever. New bottle worked as expected.
I like React but since hooks (v16.8), React’s changes are nothing but skill bragging.

I stopped hoping for the reason behind changing the class components API to hooks.
Android alerts got there way before carrier alerts today.

Reality doesn't care what you think should be the fastest.
The photos look like an AI was given the prompt “tech ceo, headshot, for press release”.
Do you genuinely believe that fines are the same as bribes?
Backtracking is not a fast SAT solver.
Is their valuation proposition self fulfilling: the more people pipe their queries to OpenAI, the more training data they have to get better?
Bummer that they have no stats for AMD, Intel, Qualcomm, etc (C|G|N|X)PUs.
surfline.com has them all over the world, but you have to pay $9/mo to watch them (I have a sub for surfing info). They have a 24h rewind feature which is pretty cool. People use it sometimes for video of themselves surfing, but I guess it would also be useful for random events like tsunamis.

On that note, I checked feeds at both Ocean Beach and Linda Mar at the predicted time but didn't see anything unusual, except that they apparently made all the surfers get out (first time I've ever seen Linda Mar empty of surfers during daylight hours apart from big storms/flat spells). OB had a bunch of spectators lined up on the dunes... an interesting reaction to a tsunami warning is "let's go to the beach and watch!".
The field of ai is far older than that, my degree was in artificial intelligence starting in 2005 so before the dnn boom with rbms (I was replicating them only in my masters, I think it was more 2008ish that became a bigger topic?)
In my experience, React was an interesting take, but it had certain flawed red-flags that were ignored from the start. I wrote posts about it, but was doomed as a skeptic. The original fundamental premise: let's do one-way binding with virtual DOM, re-render, diff – did not make fundamental sense. Double the memory in browser, complete re-render & diff for every interaction? The answer was: Make it reliable, then make it fast. Now, it's full of hacked-up constructs attempting to make it fast – but it's neither fast nor reliable. At least with honest two-way binding frameworks, fast is guaranteed, and reliability comes from my experience. With React it's just a mess. I pity all the frontend engineers who's first intro has been with React, because unlearning is much more difficult than learning.

Being mindful of the never-ending-nirvana frontend spirit of churn, and after doing web development in VBScript, JS, JQuery, Mootools, Applets, Actionscript, YUI/Ext/Sencha, Backbone, Knockout, Angular1, Angular2, React, Vue1 – I'd say try Flutter. It's genuinely a breath of fresh air.

Except... Dart. If only Flutter was in Typescript it might have been a bit closer to nirvana. The Dart part is still keeping the frontend spirit of churn alive.
If you use a VPN, wouldn't it suffice to just make your VPN connection use BBR?

Ditto if you use an https proxy of some kind.
Because both are ubiquitous to the point they basically dominate a large part of a usecase's toolspace.
The Malazan response is below the deck response.
India is a top 5 beef producer, exporter and consumer [1]. (On a per capita basis it's miniscule [2].)

Broadly speaking, vegetarianism increases as you go north. Assam is a northern state.

[1] https://www.iowafarmbureau.com/Article/World-Beef-Trade

[2] https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/beef-cons...
A couple of points:

1. If copyright lasted 40 years, then C&H would still be under copyright, and the first 46 years of Mickey would be not; The first C&H strip is closer to today than it is to the first Mickey cartoon.

2. There is a difference between picking the rules and picking the preferred behavior under existing rules; if someone thought copyright should only last 20 years, then one reasonably believe both that C&H ought not be under copyright and respect Watterson's anti-merchandising point of view. Plenty of people who say that "Every billionaire is a policy failure" may also laud the donations of particularly philanthropic billionaires.
> If somebody claims that something can be done with LLM in 10 minutes which takes 4.5 hours for them, then they are definitely not experts.

Looks like a no true scotsman definition to me.

I'm don't fully agree or disagree with your point, but it was perhaps made more strongly than it should have been?
I appreciate you treating the question in the way it was intended: A thought experiment.

Our system does not treat seriously the bad behavior of corporations. It is a way for shareholders to get only the upside and not suffer the consequences.

Long ago, I divested from a mutual fund when I realized that it made me an indirect owner of Philip Morris. As shareholders, we can make choices that harm people and yet we risk no consequences beyond losing our investment.

If it is a serious argument that we should jail more CEOs, then all who profit from criminal corporate behavior should be punished.
It's part of the same conversation. Should be below that other response.
As a co-author of the book of the same name, I’m disappointed that you didn’t see fit to provide any kind of attribution
Glad to see hot aisle again providing support to the AMD research community!
Sql syntax does not change every month
>but forfeiture of shares is pretty reasonable.

From who, and to who?

From only those big shareholders with seats on the board, from the "little guy", or from both?

What happens to the forfeited shares in your proposal? Are we redistributing them? Are they getting nationalized? Mandatory buybacks? Destruction of those shares, increasing the voting power of the other shares?