skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It was designed with the person who will operate it in mind and it's made in the USA. That means it looks fantastic to me.
I mean, I guess the Senate has the power to revoke the treaty. Short of that, though, just standing aside means that it goes to court, as you said, where the Senate has no say. So I'm not sure you think this is a measure of the Senate's willingness to check Trump's power, because I'm pretty sure they're not going to repeal NAFTA. That would not be passively allowing him to run wild; it would be actively aiding him, which is a harder sell.

I have hope for the Senate. They weren't going to confirm Gaetz. Yeah, there are a bunch of other things they need to not go along with, but they aren't going to be complete doormats.
Try the Ozlo sleep buds, from folks who didn't want Bose sleep buds to disappear:

https://ozlosleep.com/

Consider the sound Crimson Cloak for city masking. These are not cancelling, they are masking, but reasonably effective as well as portable.

As for the rest of your piece, if you don't want to spend too much, look to recording studio sound baffling and absorption for your room's sound reflective surfaces, or theater drapery for your windows and if you need more a canopy bed or hospital bed curtain tracks to enclose you in damping.

If you are willing to spend more, NYC and similarly dense cities (1 in 50 Americans live in NYC) have specialty home builders that can make music rooms, piano practice rooms, neighbor noise blocking rooms, etc., using box within a box construction techniques to separate your space from the spaces around you with sound dampening. (Think like vacuum bottle, but for acoustic waves instead of cold/heat.)

Here are many approaches between these paths:

https://www.soundproofwise.com/soundproof-walls/
Hey there, this is Aloke from Warp here. We originally built custom tab completions in Warp partly because of limitations with how Warp’s input works. We think our completions can be better for a lot of common commands (git, yarn, npm, etc) but I totally hear you that when completions in Warp don’t work like they do in another terminal it’s very frustrating.

No ETA for this yet, but this is very much on our radar to fix asap.
Hi HN,

I’ve been working on JSONtr.ee, a web platform for visualizing and graphing JSON data. While building it, I ended up creating my own lightweight JavaScript library to help anyone convert a JSON file into a schema graph.

Before creating this library, I used MermaidJS, but I ran into significant limitations, especially with large and deeply nested JSON objects. My library was built to handle these cases better and to offer more flexibility for customization. After solving my own problem, I decided to make it available for free to anyone who might find it useful.

Key features:
Transforms JSON into schema graphs.
Handles large and complex JSON objects seamlessly.
Built with simplicity in mind – dependency-free and easy to integrate.

Why I made this:
While working with APIs and large webhook payloads, I struggled to understand nested structures using standard tools. This library makes it easier to visualize the data as a graph and explore it interactively.

I’d love to hear your feedback, suggestions, or any ideas for improvement.

Thanks for taking a look!
i think the slack side is easy. I think an AI-optimized email communication channel is a long ways off. I spent weeks throwing things at my monitor figuring out reliable ways to wire DNS+SES+SNS+Lambda+Webhooks+API+Datastore+Async Workers so that everything would "just work" with a few lines of humanlayer sdk.

And what we build still only serves a small subset of use cases (e.g. to support attachments there's a whole other layer of MIMEtype management and routing to put things in S3 and permission them properly)
That is not health advice, that is "how to be anorectic" advice. If you are at the weight with longest lifespan, you are somewhere at the top of "normal" bmi range and wont see ribs. You wont seen them in the middle of "normal" range and plenty of thin wont see them either.

Otherwise said, for quite a lot of people accomplishing this would mean underweight.

Underweight is less healthy the overweight.
I was curious how much closer it was than the Sombrero (about 10x).
The lack of fibre also contributes to lack of satiety which is another driving factor that makes people eat more processed food.

The potato chip satiety issue is also investigated in a few studies. Baked potato is some of the most satiating foods. But when you fry it in oil it just does something to your brain that makes you crave for more

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324078#boiled-or-b...
> Isn't this equal opportunity, which means equality, which also support?

Sorry, I forked the convo in two different replies. I explain the difference with equal opportunity in my other response. But basically, the introduction of the idea of equity was because the prior idea of equal opportunity assumed everyone starts from the same place, or has the same potential.

With equal opportunity, you give everyone the exact same education.

With equity, you give everyone the education they deserve.

> I thought California, or at least SFUSD, did exactly opposite. For instance, they pushed the algebra to Grade 8 (or grade 9?) and geometry to grade 9, in the name of equity. That is, they try to restrict the access from even the ordinary kids (many kids have no problems studying algebra before grade 8) in the name of helping the challenged.

Ya, instead of providing additional support to help struggling students access advanced math earlier, they essentially "leveled down" by restricting access for everyone. That case is often cited as an example of how misunderstanding equity (or using equity as a cover for other goals, let's be honest) can lead to policies that actually increase educational disparities rather than reducing them.

I can't explain it, and I don't support it. But it's not an example of equity, even if it pretends to be.

I think sometimes the political deadlock results in stupid things like this. Like, they wanted funding to help struggling students, got opposition to it, so resorted to this "cost-free" but harmful alternative, and labeled it as "equity" to try to make it more palatable and fool the people who wanted them to implement equity polices to believe they did.
"If LLM makers seem cursed to an airline-style business destiny, how come they are able to raise so much money? ...What do they know that I don't? It is a mystery - but let's consider the options..."

Not mentioned: a lot of the "money" that they raised, was not actually cash but credits for cloud compute. If you've already bought too much cloud capacity, giving away some of it and claiming it as an investment in AI, looks like a good idea.
I meant that it is explicit, not just an assumption but the very metaphysics. A Logos is thought as predominant over the Agent that uses it. (Otherwise, it would be logical to have perfection and only perfection immediately.)

> an argument from faith

I think it remains (it was intended to be) a logical argument from the very definitions (not from devotional faith).

--

Edit: sorry, but I realize I misremembered a few important details, that could make the above quite misleading...

Leibniz speaks of full omnipotence. So, that Logos is not "above" Divinity in an ontological sense, but in a purely logical sense. I.e. it was impossible to do differently as this is "the best possible plan", not "the best achievable".

> we are not well enough acquainted with the general harmony of the universe and of the hidden reasons for his conduct; and that makes people recklessly judge that many things could have been improved [... // ...] to know in detail his reasons for ordering the universe as he has, allowing sin, and granting his saving grace in one way rather than another, is beyond the power of a finite mind

~~ Leibniz, Discourse on Metaphysics(1686)
I think that making the iPod mount like a filesystem would have had significant impact on other aspects of the device.

There is no filesystem level abstraction over USB (or Firewire). So plugging in presents as a hard drive / block device, which then means it needs to have a filesystem. For "built-in" cross OS compatibility that means it would be have to be a FAT filesystem. If you change these decisions either a new filesystem or device driver would need to be installed for some machines.

Most devices that present a FAT filesystem when plugged in stop working like they do when unplugged. i.e. the device itself and the connected computer cannot access the data at the same time. For the iPod this would mean it wouldn't be possible to play music while syncing.

I think it might be possible to build a "fake" drive and FAT filesystem when plugged in, but it would take quite a bit of work and have lots of odd corner cases. For example, the user on the computer attempting to re-format the drive, perhaps with a different filesystem.
meant to reply sooner. It's an interesting problem. I'll have to think on this one.
I agree with the devil's advocacy you've posed, and in retrospect I probably should have said "I bet these folks have a plan for binary data". These are clearly very serious people so it might be more accurate to say that I strongly suspect a subsequent revision of the protocol will bake in default transport-level handling of arbitrary tensors in an efficient way.
Whether voluntary or not, foreign deployment is inherently political.
Anyone can identify the significance of it, which is that we're easily coerced into fighting europe's war which europe has no interest in spilling blood. Downright disrespectful and an easy rejection.
Related:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42246837 ("HN: Warren Buffett's Philanthropic Vision and Legacy Planning in his latest note")
Some people just assume that legal == good. Too many of them comment on conundrums of morality without making that clear.
It amuses me that ChatGPT actually seems like a generic term already. You Chat with a Generative Pre-trained Transformer. Does what it says on the tin!
I’m sure I’ve seen a clip of some tv chef saying it is unnecessary. Maybe Jacques Pépin but not sure.
> $20/200

reduce your fractions ffs
Oh, I surely do mind. I am just helping the AI to manipulate the rest of humanity with less friction.

I, for one, welcome our agentic AI human-exploiting overlords.
Bochs can use several BIOSes than its own ones.
Here's the abstract:
Optimism is linked to a range of positive social and cognitive outcomes across development. Yet decades of work in psychological science has revealed that optimism declines throughout early childhood. Despite this well-documented decline, there is no agreed-upon theory that accounts for developmental changes in optimism. In this Perspective, we synthesize cognitive, computational, social and neural evidence and discuss three candidate mechanisms that might underlie declines in optimism with age: learning from experience, changing theories of success and wishful thinking, and shifts in valenced learning biases. We argue that declining optimism across childhood is best characterized by an account that integrates these theories. Specifically, we suggest that environmental factors impact the pace at which children’s theories and valenced learning biases change with age, and consequently the rate at which their optimism declines. This account suggests that optimism should be conceptualized as an adaptive bias that signals the nature of one’s environment and leads to specific recommendations for future lines of enquiry
Sorry but the citizens of Detroit don't select the school board in Alpena. Too many Americans focus on a Presidential election every four years that gets decided by a couple hundred thousand people in 4 or 5 states and ignore all of the elections that actually impact their day to day lives.

Get involved in your local elections, even if only becoming an informed citizen. Those are the elections where you can make a difference.
The problem I always run into with eTags is that the point of an eTag is that it either: one, has to be cheap to re-calculate, or two, you need some pubsub system to mark all cached content as stale and invalidate them.

The former is much less likely to break (less maintenance overhead) but harder to set up and cash in on, because essentially you need to move all of the deterministic work to the end of the request, do all of the nondeterministic parts first, calculate the eTag from that data, and then if it matches don't do the rest.

And the problem is that pure functional part at the end often just isn't that expensive compared to all the fanout that comes before. It's data transforms and the cost of writing to cache. So you have to do that pattern in your services too in order to get some oomph out of this solution, except perhaps in some narrow problem domains.
> every one of them you see on the road today is at least 30 years old, and some could be pushing 40.

Survivor bias: The ones you see are the ones that have survived. You don't see the junkyards full of failed trucks.
People won't seriously discuss this because they implicitly regard women as unthinking animals that can't change their behavior through reasoned discussion. If something makes women act in a certain way that is harmful to themselves then that something should be destroyed, be it cameras or men. And men are just violent and controlling enough to act on this impulse whenever it appears,

Hence the violent display of destroying cameras on sight and becoming the savior of women from themselves and the lowly men who seek to take advantage of them. It's a fun narrative, but it's quickly becoming boring and antiquated as the years draw on.
I may be the minority on this view, but I think that it's possible to be both a recognized expert aka legend and loud ("visible" might be a kinder word).

When you talk technology, I listen, and I doubt I'm alone in that. Keep up the good work with fly.io!
I generated a classic chess set based on Nowruz and it generated Hanukkah as the opponent x_x
It must be a nice consolation for the various European powers that their colonies breaking away seems to have absolved them of any blame not just the institutionalization of chattel slavery, but apparently also the creation of scientific racism.
Indeed. And even if it was a Scheme, it would be a Lisp. All Schemes are Lisps, not all Lisps are Schemes.
Playing around, the prompt "Arm cpus" generated an opponent "Leg cpus". You are technically correct...
> these are Google engineers managing a million interacting state machines via a giant pile of global (mutable) state

Yeah that doesn't sound good. I understand the point you are making now and agree.
> not going around and inflating the price of the other vintage camera stuff I want to buy.

I don't think I've ever seen the vintage camera market this inflated, stuff that would have been <$50-100 5 years ago is going for $400+ and that's if you can even find stock of it. Even film has skyrocketed in price, despite more of it being produced now than any other time in the last decade or two.
phone self-service systems, tutoring services, contract review, recruiting. Just to name a few
Even HN and Reddit were like that Back In The Day...
Yes, the most common example would be clinical trials for drugs and other medical treatments- often have thousands of patients (with recruitment being the limiting factor). There are tons of ways that studies can go wrong, for example when patients don't take the treatment and lie (this is common) or have other lifestyle factors that influence the results, which can't be easily smoothed out with slightly larger N.

I don't know how to fix the nutritionist studies- I'm still pretty skeptical that you could ever control enough variables to make any sort of conclusion around things with tiny effect sizes. This isn't like nutritional diseases we've seen in the past, for example if you look at a disease like pellagra (not getting enough niacin), literally tens of thousands of people died over a few years (beri beri, rickets, scurvy are three other examples; these discoveries were tightly coupled to the discovery of essential nutrients, now called vitamins).
> I'd love to read what you think and which ways I can improve it (event the marketing/wording).

More on this, I I'd like to get feedback on whether it's intuitive or not (I went with a builder which is what I personally find intuitive but I'd love to hear what more seasoned (and unbiased) people think).
https://archive.today/X4zFI
I don't think i could call them career, but i tried 4 jobs that have nothing in common.
UPS brown trucks (they call them “cars” internally) are also custom made. They don’t even resell them when they are at EOL they crush them.
Homemade Chord-Based Synthesizer
When you put in significantly less effort into the conversation and refuse to acknowledge the points being made by others in the conversation, it appears to be trolling, whether it is meant to be or not. Repeating your prompt in three successive comments without modification isn't productive.

The other commenter's point isn't about them individually - it is about industry trends and what will make money.

People hate ads, but Youtube just keeps pushing more and more and people watch Youtube. People dislike being tracked (so they say) but they keep Tiktok and Instagram on their phones. People claim to care about worker wages but don't blink at buying cheap Chinese merch or watching their favorite cartoons with outsourced, overworked, non-union foreign animators.

Your point isn't countering theirs. They didn't say "No one will ever want human entertainment in 10 years". They suggest that companies will push it to lower costs, and many will go along with it because there will be fewer options.
Generative AI for Economic Research: LLMs Learn to Collaborate and Reason
I am quite happy sharing many things.

Facts are great! When I got 'em, happy to share them.

Ways to reason or more generally think are of great interest as well. We have many modes of thought here. Was considerably less diverse some time back, and very early on, many here flat out tried to shout me down.

Worldviews are meh.

Experiences are much better, particularly when they apply to a process or task or even advocacy of some kind.

As for time. Well, that depends on our input and output speeds.

How about we settle for verbose? Hope that works.

I have no qualms regarding exchange sizes.

Frankly, my top preference is that others be as real as they can, even when that means I won't like it all that much.

I tend to avoid personal judgements. Those are generally unnecessary.
Or agree that the top 5% should get the same resources and give each one a private tutor at the same cost.
What about the atoms?
My point was that a much more capable vehicle could be purchased for a similar price. Depending on the use case, of course other commercial vehicles would make more sense. The smaller versions of the Ford Transit are a popular option among non-US postal services. And if US Postal Service was willing to buy foreign vehicles, they could have even smaller and cheaper options. (Though they'd have to deal with EPA and NHTSA rules to make them street legal.)
I think you owe us some information to satisfy 'intellectual curiosity'! :)

I'll start: Why did they create a brand-new and why a dedicated ERP system? Didn't the manufacturer have an ERP system used for manufacturing other vehicles?
> Imho, the only viable/main solution is to acknowledge that we all aren’t equal, we don’t all have access to the same opportunities, but as a country we can implement policies that lessen the imbalance.

But lessening the imbalance is the opposite of what you want.

Say you have $300 to invest in educating one student.

If you invest it in the stupid student, that student will develop $100 of learning, and the imbalance will shrink by a small amount.

If you invest it in the smart student, that student will develop $300 of learning, and the imbalance will grow by a large amount.

Which is better?
Nerve cells of blind mice retain their visual function
Apologies man, I meant the Wikipedia article parent posed, not yours
Well then it is a worthless term. Both granulated sugar and HFCS are processed foods. Corn syrup is a household ingredient. No idea why you think a bit higher percentage of fructose changes anything.
Long-Run Asset Returns
> Given that they are in residential areas (and thus, in proximity of kids playing outside) far more often than UPS/Fedex...

That isn't the case at all in my experience. In any neighborhood I've ever lived in, you see at least one van from each organization come through daily. And if anything, UPS and FedEx come through more than once per day sometimes, whereas USPS doesn't.

Per your earlier point about freight I can imagine that UPS/FedEx have a lower percentage of company traffic in residential areas than USPS does. But I find it difficult to imagine that the total number of trips to residential areas is lower for them. They simply have more non-residential traffic than USPS, not less residential traffic.
Not exactly the same, but Basil II of eastern Rome had his enemy soldiers blinded after a decisive victory and sent back to Bulgaria to be a burden.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kleidion
All those are about equality, namely equal access. I'm totally for that. What I'm not for is manufactured equity, namely equal outcome by force.

You probably know a typical situation in many families: one kid is years ahead of math program without even trying, and another struggles with math no matter hard the parents try but is good at reading and writing. According to the progressive government, the parents should mandate the former kid to learn less math and the latter to do less reading, so they can achieve the same degree of learning. That's just insane.
At any given point people are more likely to offer you more $$ for accumulated skills rather than pay you while you learn those new skills.
Every* food is processed food the amount of processing varies.
At that point why not just grind them in a food processor?
Looks like the access have been shut down.
Yes, NoSQL is pointless.
> My point was that a much more capable vehicle could be purchased for a similar price.

This leaps to a conclusion. Probably the documents are public - why did they choose this solution over off-the-shelf options? (No point in speculation; what is their actual analysis?)
That would mean that throughout the last 30 years in many places around the world, gifted kids have never been given what they need to capitalize on their gift? Which maybe...

I can't remember where I saw that in the first place, but I'd assume it would have gone off historical data, and hopefully looked across a few different places. So it might be that we never really supported gifted kids, or it could mean that it's a temporary gift.
Ah yes, the ol' I can't tell a fruit farm from a factory shtick
How any group of one thousand people could be truly safe? Of course they would get infiltrated. Groups who want to survive being hunted kinda have to either be smaller, or divide themselves into cells.
I won't say it isn't possible that someone might struggle with this—it's quite subjective, obviously—but I do think it's unlikely that anyone with a general understanding of both volume and surface area would struggle here.

Even just comparing two consecutive iterations, I feel confident that any child who has learned the basic concepts would be able to reliably tell you which has more enclosed volume or surface area.

I will happily concede that the part you quoted could be quite unintuitive without the context of the article or the animation included in it. :)
There's something painfully ironic and disturbing that the pseudo-Kolmogorov complexity of clickbait content, as judged "identical in quality" by an average human viewer, is arguably less than the length of the clickbait headline itself, and perhaps even less than the embedding vector of said headline!
Yes and that syntax sucks.