skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
this comment actually prompted me to finally download and install the factorio demo, been hearing so many things about how it takes over lives! :)
> what ?!?! NTFS has no case sensitivity no compression.

As the sibling comment mentioned, NTFS does have a case-sensitive mode, for instance for the POSIX subsystem (which no longer exists, but it existed back when NTFS was new); I think it's also used for WSL1. And NTFS does have per-file compression, I've used it myself back in the early 2000s (as it was a good way to free a bit of space on the small disks from back then); there was even a setting you could enable on Windows Explorer which made compressed files in its listing blue-colored.
I really don't think MSG is banned in Europe.
When I did my teacher training fifteen or so years ago, we were told that information that was written down by hand was retained for longer than information that was typed. This article seems to correlate with what I was taught.

However, there's no underlying theory to anything in psychology. Psychologists come up with things they call theories, but when you look at them a bit more closely, they're 'just-so stories' that happen to fit some experimental results. The experimental results themselves are shallow correlations between inputs and outputs. Prod the brain in this specific way, and see how it responds. EEG experiments like the one linked only tell us what bits of the brain respond to what stimuli; we don't know what's actually going on in forming a response to that stimulus.

You can point to the ethics protocols by which experimenters are bound to not harm their subjects - these are important and worthy. You can point to the advertising industry's use of psychology to improve its effectiveness, but this is itself a shallow endeavour. As far as improving our understanding the brain as a physical system, the discipline of psychology is much activity with little achievement.
those CAFE standards, or the “not an EV mandate” have destroyed the US car market. Trucks come standard with 4 cylinder engines now and manufacturers are reducing their offerings to meet the aggressive climate goals.

Check Chevy and Dodge too. Chevy has one sedan and Dodge is still selling 2023 model years to avoid CAFE.
Doesn’t fit the structure of a pyramid scheme, though. None of the early backers are getting any money out of it.
People internalize conversations and the thought processes that went into them. If I have a conversation with somebody, I often walk away remembering and understanding what somebody else said and why they said it. And these memories get used in future interactions. So just like the offloading of arithmetic likely resulted in people not being able to perform mental math, what would be the result of conversing with an AI that has hallucination/logical issues (a lesser intelligence)? Isn't it reasonable to guess that this will result in diminished reasoning?
Using the checker idiom to monitor software systems
The Computer Revolutionized Weather Forecasting [video]
The Volvo 940 had all of those modern safety features, but was still more or less the same car as the older RWD 740.

Mercedes also had that stuff early- I had a 1987 Mercedes diesel that had front air bags, ABS, and was basically modern car reliable.
From personal experience: in Nature Communications the handling editor and editor in chief absolutely do intervene, in my example to suppress a proper lit review that would have revealed the paper under review as much less innovative than claimed.
Is this any good for beginners/kids?
I'm still not convinced most of the computers in my home need to care about leaking data this way. I'm open to being persuaded, though.
But requiring them is fine too. Even more on Postrges, that has booleans.
> This site is misrepresenting itself as open source and free

It's not.

They don't say that the site and all the services they offer are free and open-source, they say that the Archivarix CMS is free and open-source (GNU GPLv3), which it is...

> as you don't even download/run the software yourself

You can download the CMS.

> but as there's no way to self-host this, let alone download it and/or run it, for free or otherwise

Again yes you can both download it and self-host the CMS

> I think it's safe to avoid this scammy site.

It's scammy because they're not offering everything for free and open-source even though they never said they would?

https://archivarix.com/en/cms/
I don’t really understand how the company that’s supposed to be holding your money vaporized 99.8% of it. I watched that video, but I don’t really get it.
But this is not handwriting vs typing. It's handwriting vs. "a weird input method none of the participants had ever used before", namely pecking at the keyboard with one finger of one hand.
How to Use a Differential Analyzer (To Murder People)
Wow, strong start with an introduction to bolt.new, I'm impressed and might use this in my day-to-day
>Errors are just a case of return data!

Are they? Why mix valid data with errors?
it's not about trusted/untrusted as in what will they do with the data. it's entirely about will the service be available long term or if theGoogs will deprecate it in the future.

I have no skin in the game of push notification infrastructure, but we've seen plenty of ShowHNs where a critical part of the Show is a total dependency on a 3rd party shim. While this isn't something like a dependency on a Twitter API that suddenly got yanked, it is still something that devs should really consider. Especially given theGoogs' track record.

Maybe this isn't the case it is a library deeply embedded in the Android ecosystem, but anytime a ShowHN mentions a dependency on theGoog it sets of the SpideySenses
You don't really need your CA doing eIDAS in the system root. This scheme works as a closed system where you need eIDAS app to produce the artifact and another eIDAS app to verify it, when both have their own non-system root.

Ukraine for example successfully operates their own eIDAS-like scheme where everything is based on DSTU+GOST algos not supported by any operating systems a major libraries, the certs are signed by the government root and it doesn't leak into web pki.
I consider Elon Musk a clown. But this move is economically very clever. It is the beginning of the next disruption of the personal transportation business.
> a clandestine guild creates artifacts from a fictional world with the intent to deceive

In coolly-detached economics terms, we could call it a large-scale business in assymetric information.[1]

But the abuse of assymetric information can lead to market collapse. And to judge from the state of modern society, the information collapse has returned people into Plato's allegorical cave of ignorance and fear. [2]

The intellectual catastrophe is the same, but the difference in the modern world is a) the enormity of what we have lost, and b) that people's caves are more comfortable and they watch the shadows dance on a wall of high-resolution pixels.

[1] _ https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/asymmetricinformation.a...

[2] _ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_cave
So, you want it to take over your life?
Yeah that's what I thought -- all the React codebases that I've worked in are riddled with `useEffect` for this reason primarily.
Tracing the Emergence of Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography [pdf]
Wow. Junk science indeed. "Unforeseen effects on the brain" so you essentially test in a way that is incomparable to those who are experienced typists?

If you're only using one finger to type, of course you're using less brain activity to control that one finger, versus all ten.

I'm unable to read the actual paper, but from the comments here, it sure seems like they worked backwards from an existing premise ("handwriting is better than typing for retaining information") and found a way to make that "truth".

Edit: Missed the link to the article in the comments. Reading it now.
I think the idea was to use client certs for strong authentication on the government web services, which didn't rally took off, except maybe in Estonia.
> Either way, this makes little sense overall. If a CA is trustable, it can be trusted to sign a certificate for any domain. And if it's not trustable, then you can't trust it for any domain.

That's a silly position to take.

When I lived with roommates, I trusted them. But I also locked my bedroom when I went out. Because there's no good reason to rely on trust when you don't have to.
I am not convinced either but I am willing to bet some software is adversarial and will try to exfiltrate data. F.ex. many people look suspiciously at Zoom and Chrome.

So as long as stuff is not perfectly isolated from each other then there's always a room for a bad actor to snoop on stuff.
Yes, but surely the listed companies don't use their public and globally trusted CAs to MITM their internal networks. I hope they have another internal CA to allow them to MITM their internal Network.
Advent of Cyber 2024
Dive into the wonderful world of cyber security by engaging in festive beginner-friendly exercises every day in the lead-up to Christmas!
>There, mineralogists were able to relate the stone to synthetic BiSbO4 – bismuth antimonate – though with the formula Bi3+Sb5+O4, an arrangement never before found in nature.

How do they know it's not a synthetic stone to begin with?
It could be interesting to find the shortest solution. But the site is not set up for verifying solutions in various languages.
Sure, but it starts to get hard a few days in so beginners won't be able to finish. However, I think that makes it an amazing learning opportunity. There's plenty of write-ups on solutions on the internet.
When handwritng you use some additional brain pathways to finely coordinate the hand. When typing you don’t need that but use a different one that learned the keyboard. I think using both is good to reinforce that knowledge.
Since that thread, did you try tablets and eInk/ePaper devices?
For a broader definition, I'll refer you to Dr. Michael Wong, astrobiologist and planetary scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science's Earth & Planets Laboratory: https://pca.st/episode/40b841c8-6f31-4bbb-88e0-c834ae319ee4
I’d ignore the critique completely - it lacks internal consistency. The similar final result is due to central limit theorem, which is a large n result, and actually lets you ignore the hypergeometric construct and use a binomial instead since those are similar for large n.
[edit: grammar]
Any system with memoryless finite transition rule (the Markov property) and full observability of the state is a Markov chain. In language models the "traditional" Markov chain model is the very simple small-context table lookup, but in many other fields they can be a lot more complicated. E.g. Markov Chain Monte Carlo and many statistical mechanics applications.

It's mathematically well understood and very poweful abstraction which is lost if they're thought only as the simple toy language model.
AI Is Changing Oil Country–and Pumping Up Profits
where's the fun in summarizing the content? You're missing out on all the great humour in the video
That would not be a side effect of the dialogue, but from awareness of the wider world.
> Am I entitled to a refund if I import American hardware that refuses to operate in my country?

If the product doesn't obviously communicate that it won't work in your country: yes.
Not everyone is on the spectrum and think life should be lived as a big factorio game
And nowadays it sometimes just silently drops a huge range of matching verbatim results without even informing the user.

It’s especially serious when searching for UN related documents, which have a special document symbol structure.

e.g. 99.9%+ of the documents under the classification A/C.1/… simply don’t show up with a “A/C.1/“ search, except for a handful. And it’s not like irrelevant results are clogging it up either, as Google only returns 40ish results for the whole internet. When there’s thousands of publicly accessible UN documents in that category…
Advent of Rust 2024
> In practice, this would be an enormous number of states

The paper mentions this explicitly:

For GPT-3 (Brown et al., 2020), this represents 5 × 10^11 training tokens, which pales in comparison with the number of non-zero elements in Qf, given by T^K+1 ≈ 10^9632.
The lack of domain re-verification seems important. The other things listed are the case for any social media platform, but they bear repeating.

I hope domain re-verification is fairly automatic once implemented. If I remove my Bluesky information from my DNS, it should be a safe assumption that the affiliated account will soon lose its username, maybe within a week or two. Same if I'm buying a domain; I wouldn't want lingering accounts for months or years after the fact. If it's a more manual process, that could be annoying, especially since you can also use subdomains -- someone could be "admin.example.com" and fly under the radar when selling example.com.
This is a strange set of changes to me. Most of them seem to have little to no benefit. None of them seem worth the migration effort except for "policy for non-existent subdomains".

There are two changes I would like to see but that don't seem to be addressed.

1. Option to require DKIM, instead of the current SPF *or* DKIM. I can hold my key close and have less trusted forwarders (which is sometimes necessary for receivers who are very picky about source IP) without allowing them to send mail that I didn't pass to them. For example with AWS SES I can hold the key and let them deliver my mail. But with the current situation they can also corrupt or make up new mail and it is trusted because it passes SPF. If I could say that the message *must* have a DKIM signature then they can't do that.

2. Solving mailing lists. Right now I use p=reject so my participation on many mailing lists (including IETF ones) is basically prevented. Google Groups does sender rewriting when solves this in an ugly way, but it isn't common and it would be nice to have a standardized solution.

Why bother adding a successor to pct? It works fine, so what if people always use pct=0 or pct=100, that is fine. No need to add a new spelling and confuse everyone.

> what’s the “denominator” and how do you estimate it?

Roll a d100 and if it is <= pct then apply the policy to the message. I don't get what is confusing about this.
This seems to be an ad for bolt.new?
I'm trying to build server rendered websites, but I find React (or other SPA-API systems) hard to resist:

- Form is hard. Doing it in backend make it even harder when the form is complicated. For example, a form with tab needs JS to operate and you need to signal the JS which tab the error is.

- If you're using backend form framework, you don't have control over the HTML unless you learn the hook points of it (do you add attribute in code, or in template? Where is the default template to override?) Compared to frontend framework where you can paste the CSS framework's example HTML.

- I wanted to build a new user wizard, which should be easy with a frontend framework as you can easily store incomplete state in memory. If not using JavaScript one would have to store the state in the untyped session variables, add hooks cluttering the HTML template, etc.

- Progressive enhancement is easier when you have to write the code only once. If there's a table and you want to refresh without refreshing the page, in React you just call the data fetcher again. In HTMX your backend needs to have a "full render" endpoint and a "table only" render endpoint. If you're using jQuery you might as well write the table loop twice in the backend template engine and in jQuery.

- I haven't see any good backend framework (be it Django, Laravel, Symfony, Gin) that has similar server-rendered frontend component like React. Many frameworks believed that logic should be precomputed in the view layer and the template engine should not be turing-complete.

I was thinking about moving to SSR-rendered SPA, but I know of no Next.js-style library for any frontend framework that actually allow form submission without JavaScript AND progressive enhancement with JavaScript using the same code.
Interplay between implicit and explicit Sense of Agency in the human mind
LLM transitions are pseudoprobabilistic.
They assume that as there seem to be no production for this kind of material happening within the sphere of man made industry, anything found must be natural.
I am 100% the same.

People often claim that taking notes by hand, because it is slow, forces you to interpret and condense what you are learning into a more compact representation, and therefore understand it better.

That has never been the case for me -- while I'm busy doing that thinking, I missed the last 3 sentences from the lecturer, and then am struggling to catch up, and when I finally figure out what they're explaining again, there's no more time to write it down.

But I can type faster than lecturers speak. And obviously you don't take notes verbatim either, just the gist of a sentence. Then after the seminar is over, I can go over the notes at my own pace to build my understanding. Details that didn't seem that relevant during the seminar, I suddenly realize are key.

I really don't understand why people don't talk about this advantage more.
Now do it with a Dvorak or Colemak layout. lol.
The Catholic Church does retain elements of Aristotelian metaphysics in its theology. A great example is the Catholic teaching of transubstantiation, wherein subject and accident terminology is utilized to explain how bread and wine become the body and blood of Christ while retaining the characteristics of the original elements. Church history is fascinating, even if one isn't a Christian.
I think the whole license stuff is controlling software too much. All that legal blah has nothing to do with software and is only good for feeding overpriced lawyers.

When I publish code I don't pick any license. It's just free for anyone to use for whatever. I don't like the GPL for this, it's way too complicated. I don't want to deal with that.

It's a shame some legal BS like that is holding back the deployment of a great filesystem like ZFS.
Just add a __delete all__ button.
Forced documentation by ICs could be poorly written, leave things out or quickly sync out of date. I think there should be a dedicated team tasked with managing this documentation.
In the book, Freedman states that two assumptions of the standard error of the difference are violated by the way subjects are assigned to control and treatment groups in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

The standard error of the difference assumes that a) samples are drawn independently, i.e., with replacement; and b) that the two groups are independent of each other. By samples being drawn, I mean a subject being assigned to a group in a RCT here.

If you derive the standard error of the difference, there are two covariance terms that are zero when these assumptions are true. When they're violated, like in RCTs, the covariances are non-zero and should in theory be accounted for. However, Freedman implies that it doesn't actually matter because they effectively cancel each other out, as one inflates the standard error and the other deflates it.
Because only young people can make time for things.

There are plenty of professionals with jobs and families making time for AOC because they enjoy it. Doing the problems at the same time as everyone else is a VERY different experience from doing them whenever you'd like.

If you don't want to make the time for it, power to you. I'd recommend most people to drop off after the first 10ish days. But don't delude yourself by ascribing this as the domain of "young people" or those without responsibilities. You're making a decision. Own it.
Unless the CMS lets you backup/restore Internet Archive sites, then that is literally off-topic, beside the point, and doesn’t make sense given the context of ‘bagpuss’s comment. That ‘bagpuss was vague about what they said was free doesn’t change the context of the discussion.

I stand by what I said, as the Internet Archive feature, which is the entire point of OP’s post, is not free on their platform. The CMS is not relevant to this discussion.

It’s scammy because the kind of people who would use this wouldn’t know how many files are in the backup because they are likely no/low-context users who are likely not familiar with concepts like “average or expected number of files on a website.” The pricing is usurious and exploitative due to the pricing model being per file versus by file size for example.
I think Meta deserves more credit for the salary growth- they weren't a part of the cartel of companies colluding to keep salaries down, and them poaching from Google helped to force Google to defect.
Neither handwriting nor typewriting existed while the brain evolved.

Why does the more modern method have to be the bad one again?
Has anyone come up with a product like that recently? It seems like the Web is basically the same as it was in 2010.
Yeah, that was one of the controversial parts. I updated that paragraph to be more precise.

The draft says:

>It is therefore critical that Mail Receivers *MUST NOT* reject incoming messages solely on the basis of a "p=reject" policy by the sending domain. Mail Receivers must use the DMARC policy as part of their disposition decision, along with other knowledge and analysis. "Other knowledge and analysis" here might refer to observed sending patterns for properly-authenticated mail using the sending domain, content filtering, etc. In the absence of other knowledge and analysis, Mail Receivers *MUST* treat such failing mail as if the policy were "p=quarantine" rather than "p=reject".

So basically `p=reject` doesn't actually mean reject anymore and receivers should instead treat it as quarantine by default.

The document then goes on by saying "nobody will listen to us anyway", which is an interesting thing to read in what will be a Proposed Standard:

>In practice, despite this advice, few Mail Receivers apply any mitigation techniques when receiving indirect mail flows, few organizations consider the effect of DMARC policies on their users' indirect mail, and it is unlikely that any advice in this document will change that.
Remember when you could locate memes using google? In the name of political correctness, our tools have been blunted.
Sounds very hard to me. How do you handle online schema changes with this? Schema changes are trivial to do if you can be down for a long time.
Can you get a working game generated? All I ever see is at least "Script error." with no clear way to debug. Having bolt try to fix it seems to just regenerate bits of the app but has failed to actually fix any problems so far.
Secureblue Goes Sudoless
I think it gets worse
> To prevent artifacts produced by head and eye movements caused by shifting gaze between the screen and the keyboard, typed words did not appear on the screen while the participant was typewriting.

So no only were typists not touch typing, they couldn't see what they were typing.

Too many variables are changed between the two tests.

A) writers can see whole words vs no visual feedback
B) writers use their natural writing technique (2 or 3 fingers?) vs 1.

It'd be interesting to test typing with a single hand (using words that can be entirely touch typed with one hand)

I'm surprised the choose not to gather that data.

https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2306&...

Is interesting in that it shows the opposite effect: improved recall. It also measured velocity/speed of response. Which shows writing was faster.

Another idea for a test: writing without ink.
I'm with the GP here. Patrick Boyle isn't very interesting visually, he does some repetitive gesturing with one hand, and he rarely blinks, which I find unsettling. The presentation is slow relative to reading, as well.
Please don't post duplicate comments like this. Your first comment (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42287118) was fine but spamming a thread with copy-and-pasted comments just hurts the signal to noise ratio.