skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What you describe is exactly the challenge and opportunity to overcome.

Why should I have to rely on Google/stack overflow/chatgpt to set up my environment?
A flying taxi that spins and moves in any direction due to new propulsion system
When you think about it, this behaviour makes sense. How else would you implement it? I/O is always block oriented. The reason you don't always notice is that UNIX is so dearly line-based that every layer of the software stack goes to enormous pain to buffer everything to make interactive use convenient. (The article then talks about different types of buffering, but that is not important to the point being made.)

So we are on top of a large pile of optimizations the even make "grep | grep | grep" possible, but we are so spoiled we don't even notice until the pile of abstractions runs too deep and the optimizations doesn't work anymore!

In this specific case, it is however a strange thing to do. Why would you want to start two processes in order to search for two words? Each with its own memory management, scheduling, buffering etc.? Even if the buffering can be turned off, the other overhead will be noticeable.

If you wanted to search for ten words, would you start ten separate grep processes, each responsible for their own word?

No, you would ask grep to search for lines containing these both these two words in any order, like so:

grep 'thing1.*thing2\|thing2.*thing1'

This is probably what the article alludes to in the "grep -E" example (the -E is there in order to not have to escape the pipe character), but the author forgot to write the whole argument so the example is wrong.

It would be practical to have a special syntax for "these things, in any order" in grep, but sadly that's one of the things missing from original grep. This makes it unnecessarily difficult to construct the argument programmatically with a script. This was one of the things Perl solved with lookahead and lookbehind buffers, you can use these to look ahead from the start of the line to see if all words are present:

grep -P '^(?=.*?thing1)(?=.*?thing2)'

This syntax is hard to read and understand, but it's the least bad when needed.

(Related: How to search for any one of several words? That's much easier because each match is independent of each other, just give grep several expressions:

grep -e 'thing1' -e 'thing2'

which has none of the above problems.)
I don't think ONCE is a loss leading marketing device for them. That would also seem like a pretty poor strategy, as those users are pretty unlikely to convert.
> "the guy who crosses the city has paid more (by spending more time) for what he received, and so you still assess him as having valued the trip more than the one-stop guy."

No, I think you misread or misunderstood what I wrote. My point is that the "value" derived from a trip is _not_ proportional to the distance travelled.

> "Not really; as you just noted, the subway is a very slow method of covering distance. If you're in a hurry, it's not going to beat the alternatives."

In London, the tube or train is often the fastest way to get somewhere, particularly at rush hour. But if I place a high value on comfort, perhaps I'd consider that I get more value from a taxi ride even if it takes the same amount of time: the tube can be very hot and crowded! I'd then have to consider whether the extra value gained is enough to justify the higher cost of the taxi ride.
LinkedIn Scaled Their System to 5M Queries per Second
> resolved before lunch

blame.ignoreRevsFile
Yep, the current CEO strikes me as a different breed form the Dorseys and Musks of this world. Time will tell.
Ask these people..

George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair)

James Tiptree Jr. (Alice Bradley Sheldon)

Mark Twain (Samuel Langhorne Clemens)

Currer Bell (Charlotte Brontë)

Ellis Bell (Emily Brontë)

Acton Bell (Anne Brontë)

Qiu Jin (Jingxiong)

Voltaire (François-Marie Arouet)

Victoria Lucas (Sylvia Plath)

Yi Sang (Kim Hae-gyeong)

Mary Westmacott (Agatha Christie)

Sui Sin Far (Edith Maude Eaton)

O. Henry (William Sydney Porter)

A. M. Barnard (Louisa May Alcott)

Richard Bachman (Stephen King)

Radclyffe Hall (Marguerite Radclyffe-Hall)

Langston Hughes (vaious)

Romain Gary (Roman Kacew)

Amantine Lucile Aurore Dupin (George Sand)

Isak Dinesen (Karen Blixen)

Toni Morrison (Chloe Ardelia Wofford)

Pauline Réage (Anne Desclos)

Charles Chao (Zhao Yuanren)
to be left alive, a shell of your former self, know that you used to be capable of, but no longer are. not being able to hold a thought in your head when previously, your were one of the smartest in the room. being so exhausted all the time that just leaving the house is an accomplishment, when previously a day of snowboarding would be a blast. the absolute impotence of it. is life even worth living, knowing your former glory has been robbed by a virus that some people think was a fuss over nothing?

can you imagine what it's like to need other people to do basic life shit for you, because you're now a disabled invalid, incapable of being self sufficient. needing to be waited on, hand and foot. the worst cases aren't too far off from polio needing an iron lung just to breath.

the sweet release of death would be less cruel.
This is the NHS questionnaire study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39358009/

This on 10-20% of infections leading to long Covid https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...

Here is one prevalence study from Australia. There are loads of these https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52473

Then there is the global estimate of about 400million https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03173-6
Very impressive. I wish research like this was more deployable. It always seems to come in the form of a muddy ball of Python, rather than e.g. a C++ or Rust library you could actually deploy in a product.

I get why, but it still seems a shame that there's all this cool ML research that will only make it into actual products in 10 years when someone with the resources of Adobe rewrites it in something other than Python.
> while my parent was correct that the argument failed as a justification for two pilots, it doesn't fail for any other number

It doesn't fail as much as not work. One can always come up with hypotheticals justifying more redundancy. Whether that's worth the tradeoff requires actually looking at the facts.
It’s not like these drones would uncover much more than can already be seen by satellites. Probably much more valuable letting them be, studying their physical characteristics, flight behavior, and RF use. Also easier to track down the source - they’ve got to land at some point.
I don't know about deep level impressive but I'm finding the new Google Lens thing built recently into Chrome pretty cool and useful. You click it and highlight part of the page and then it figures what the image is or ocr's text in it and optional translates or searches it. I use it multiple times per day. Also just being able to do that was a bit sci-fi 15 years ago.

Deep level impressive but maybe just by a company owned by Google is the Deepmind stuff like AlphaFold which recently got a nobel prize and AlphaGo and MuZero. Also you may have heard of the chatgpt/llm stuff that's trendy now, all based on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer_(deep_learning_arc...
Improving Safety & Resilience at Hachyderm through Strategic Placement of Infra
> they are also the most confident in reaching them

They are by definition also the youngest in the survey. Youthful overconfidence is a thing so may not have anything to do with generations
Yes, they are really great at abstracting the SIMD operations, but the abstraction has only very few common methods. I'm not sure how much real world benefits those abstractions have.

Once you need more complex operations, you need to use the specific operations from System.Runtime.Intrinsics.(X86|ARM) based on the current architecture. And you need to adjust your implementation on the CPUs capabilities. There are still a lot of older x64 CPUs around that don't have AVX512 for example.
I probably have a milder version of post-infection fatigue, it's not as bad as mentioned in the article (like having run a marathon), but it means that I never feel fully well slept no matter how many hours I've slept, maybe once or twice a month. Those days I almost cry from joy and don't really want to waste them by working, just want to exist and take in the moment. I can still work fairly well when I'm tired and I'm not physically exhausted, but this is enough to have essentially caused my divorce, because I don't have the mental energy to put into fixing and maintaining our relationship after a workday, and on top of taking care of our kid.

It's sad to see my productivity drop as well compared to my past self, and I'm very worried that I won't be able to handle the grueling interviewing process when I need a new job. Self conscious that they will see the dark rings under my eyes and realize I won't be able to pull the hours they need.
GIFs??
Slightly edited title due to length limits.

Original title:

Ensuring Hachyderm's Future: Improving Safety & Resilience through Strategic Placement of Infrastructure
Hi veritas
Australians, you say...

Steele Rudd (Arthur Hoey Davis)

Henry Handel Richardson (Ethel Florence Lindesay Richardson)

Miles Franklin (Stella Maria Sarah Miles Franklin)

Banjo Paterson (Andrew Barton Paterson)

Joseph Furphy (Tom Collins)

C.J. Dennis (Clarence Michael James Dennis)

Barbara Baynton (Anon, initials)

Ethel Turner (Anon, initials)
I wonder how his art would have been affected if he'd had access to an Etch-A-Sketch?
"The Way goes in." --Rumi

Many of the people in this world don't have the balls to take that leap. ahem
It's possible, in the same way that embedding telemetry in a jpeg image is possible. There may be bugs in the libraries reading the data that could possibly be exploited for allowing arbitrary code execution. Now, if they did so, it's likely to be found out at some point and nobody would trust them any more.
I can't really see how you go from what the paper said to your conclusion about String Theory. A lot can be said about the latter, but I don't see how that paper changes anything about that in particular.

As for the paper itself.. I wasn't particularly impressed. A lot of it was about discussing nuances on how to interpret "Bedeutung" in English, and honestly, it's not that important. Or should I say "significant", which is what the paper claims is an incorrect translation in this case. Well, I know what "Bedeutung" means, and though I can agree that in this case "meaning" would be a more correct translation than "significant" (or "significance"), but really - that by itself doesn't change anything about how "planck units" should or would be used, and what for.
Twitter is extremely user hostile. Every time I've made an account it has inevitability asked for an email and a phone number, and at least a few captchas.
Even without the privacy aspect it’s a problem. Last weekend I was driving home in my ICE car guzzling on those dead dinosaurs, and maps on my CarPlay unit went haywire, first I was slightly off to the east by say 50 metres, but this got worse and at one point I was 10 miles away.

Unplugging my phone and the location snapped back to he correct place. Seems that in CarPlay an iPhone will believe what the car says about position, and when it’s wrong, tough.
they don’t.

borrowing a book is not creating a COPY of the book. you are not taking the pages, reproducing all of the text on those pages, and then giving that reproduction to your friend.

that is what a COPY is. borrowing the book is not a COPY. you’re just giving them the thing you already bought. it is a transfer of ownership, albeit temporarily, not a copy.

if you were copying the files from a digitally downloaded album of music and giving those new copies to your friend (music royalties were my specialty) then technically you would be in breach of copyright. you have copied the works.

but because it’s such a small scale (an individual with another individual) it’s not going to be financially worth it to take the case to court.

so copyright holders just cut their losses with one friend sharing it with another friend, and focus on other infringements instead.

which is where the whole torrenting thing comes in. if i can track 7000 people who have all downloaded the same torrented album, now i can just send a letter / court date to those 7000 people.

the costs of enforcement are reduced because of scale. 7000 people, all found the same thing, in a way that can be tracked.

and the ultimate, one person/company has download the works and making them available to others to download, without paying for the rights to make copies when distributing.

that’s the ultimate goldmine for copyright infringement lawsuits. and it sounds suspiciously like openAi’s business model.
We will be grappling with the impacts for at least a generation. To name a few:

1. For a time we had the largest impact seen on reducing poverty than we've seen in decades [1] but it was temporary. This goes against particularly American dogma against a social safety net. Another example of this was Bolsa Familia [2]. So we can no longer ignore that we, as a society, are choosing for people to be poor with all the negative externalities that comes from that;

2. Over a million Americans died from Covid yet we have a significant percentage of the population who think that Covid isn't real;

3. mRNA vaccines are a medical miracle that have been in the works for decades [3] and quite literally saved tens of millions of lives worldwide [4] yet antivaxxer sentiment persists [5], even with people who have a college science education;

4. We essentially returned to work to make the wealthy even wealthier and ditched our masks, which cost lives particularly for those who are immunocompromised and/or cannot take a vaccine for medical reasons. This starkly highlights how we, as a society, make a calculation as to how much inconvenience we're willing to tolerate over people dying.. This isn't new. For example, tens of thousands of Americans die every year in road accidents, many of which are preventable (eg excessive speeding, DUIs) and we just accept that's going to happen; and

5. Additionally, and this goes to your point, Covid was a mass disabling event. How our society treats the disabled was already disgraceful and it doesn't get much attention. A disability largely means society wants to discard you, or at least sweep you under the rug so other people don't have to think about you. I am of course talking about the so-called "ugly laws" [6]. While we largely don't have them now, it still exemplifies how we treat disabled people.

[1]: https://www.cbpp.org/research/poverty-and-inequality/expirat...

[2]: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2010/05/27/br-bols...

[3]: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w

[4]: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3...

[5]: https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/anti-science/us-survey-reveals-gr...

[6]: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/history-o...
I’ve found Vue easier to learn because it bundles things and lets you learn visual components before fully exploring the reactive model. So while the modularity of React is preferable to a seasoned developer, it does no good to a newcomer.
Not thinking about upload to make it available, just as a cheaper way of backup and access to what you already own.
OP isnt talking about putting the car in airplane mode, but the phone.

The point is that you are already tracked via your phone (which is likely kit in airplane mode), so there’s not a massive gain to preventing car tracking.
style fixes should always be separate commits. if they fix a PR, they should be part of that PR or an independent PR, but ideally not included in the next code changing PR
You obviously want a human competent enough on board to manage the train, even if everything is automated.
We're not about replacing human interaction, but enhancing the communication skills between those interactions.
Our goal is to give you actionable insights you can immediately apply in real-world scenarios, whether it's a conference call, presentation, or team meeting.
I'll hit a completely opposite tone to the article's and say this is actually pretty honest for once.

When the regular person thinks of an OS, they think of the desktop environment provided for the most part. So in my opinion, this is just the right things taking their rightful position.

If anything, certain people should now start fearing the incredible potential these decisions have in terms of ecosystem consolidation. Interesting times ahead.
> The biggest take-away is that they’re expensive (>$100 second hand) and hard to configure when using Linux.

The original (or fake, who knows) from Agilent cost that much, yes, but there is AR488 [1], which can be had for pocket money. I have limited experience myself with it (I got the Agilent one), but it seemed to work just fine.

The Agilent one is a bit tricky as its firmware is uploaded when it powers up (is connected to USB) and changes then its ID. That however is well documented and with recent versions of linux-gpib should just work (it does for me).

Then there are GPIB host adaptors for ISA, PCI and PCIe busses. The latter might be expensive and working PC MB with ISA hard to find, but those with PCI are readily available on the secondary market for reasonable prices. I made good experience with one from CEC.

[1] https://github.com/Twilight-Logic/AR488
I don't mind being downvoted at all, and have never complained about it (and didn't here). I was just curious why.

I think you're right that people perceived a "sleazy" vibe. The sibling referred to "manosphere" and "advertising".

I wonder whether that reaction would have been different if the topic had been different. I.e. to what extent the reaction was due to the wording vs the subject matter. I think tesosterone treatment itself is seen as somehow sleazy, and I referred to that as a "stigma". I speculate that that perception has something to do with the fact that in 4 years I was never checked for an obvious potential cause to my symptoms. That experience is one reason I've chosen to be quite open about this treatment. I'd probably never have found it if it hadn't been for people I know talking about it.

I'm not sure it is a "low possibility", BTW. The prevalence and causes of hypogonadism aren't very well understood but it is common and may be rather more common since COVID. There are valid concerns about over-diagnosis, but under-diagnosis of this condition also carries risks.
Only 90 medically identified families. The condition is probably far more likely than just those medically identified. And people typically do not mention abnormalities that positively affect them to their doctors.
You wouldn't be doing anyone a favour by committing electoral fraud.

But that aside, although Australia doesn't require any ID on election day, Australians do register with the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) with their name, address and date of birth. AEC workers have a printed copy of these records on election day. Obvious anomalies like someone with a different age can be reported. Otherwise anomalies like multiple votes from the same address are investigated, I imagine by interviewing the person at that address.

The AEC provides transparency about how it detects fraud and the penalties that can be imposed for people who are caught doing it. The point is that this is quite rare. The AEC's aim is to lower barriers to voting in the first place so that all people can. By detecting anomalies and using tipoffs the AEC estimates the impact of voter fraud and takes a scientific approach to recommend against raising barriers to vote.
Can't wait until Meta sue them so we can have a judgment on whether or not models weights are subject to copyright.
The genesis of FluenAI came from countless moments of post-meeting frustration – those times when you realize you didn't quite hit the nail on the head, or missed critical opportunities to connect.
Traditional communication training is slow, expensive, and often disconnected from real-world interactions. So, I decided to hack the problem and make it much simpler process by using feedback loops.

Here's the key feature:

1- Real-Time Transcription: Effortlessly transcribe your speech during meetings and presentations.

2- AI-Driven Recommendations: Receive personalized feedback to enhance your communication skills.

3- Curated Learning Modules: Engage with tailored resources to continuously improve.

4- Comprehensive Dashboard: Monitor your progress with detailed analytics and set communication goals.
Since you asked, I define reasoning as cambridge does:

Reasoning
"the process of thinking about something in order to make a decision"

Thinking:
"the activity of using your mind to consider something"

Mind:
"the part of a person that makes it possible for him or her to think, feel emotions, and understand things"

I conclude that "An algorithm that searches for the highest probability answer" is not described by "reasoning"

I also think that the definition of Mind of Cambridge is incomplete and lacks the creativity part along with cognition and emotions. But it's a vastly different topic.
> It may surprise you to know that Canada currently has more restrictive gun laws than any European country.

It certainly would, as it's not true.
There might be an audience for disillusioned rust people who get bored with fighting the borrow checker etc, but true rust developers, like c++ devs want control and won't want to hand that to go's runtime.

My guess from the readme is that the author loves some of the rust features and syntax but the simplicity of having the go language and runtime take care of making it work is just too compelling. As far as the language itself, there's nothing here that you couldn't build with go and it would likely be more productive.
A former Intel CEO even wrote a book where every product was planned 20+ years in advance.

Imagine planning 20 years in advance where Moore’s Law is still going strong. Come to think of it, Moore was also CEO of Intel lol
Like infertility.
The only sure cure for the JavaScript blues is WebAssembly.

Use something like Leptos and be happy:

https://www.leptos.dev/
To run a language model you need both the model weights and the source code of the implementation!
Sorry yes that last part was a joke :-)
Or, you know, go to the other platform that doesn't require you to do this?
Well, the model is based on llama-8b, which is quite bad at reasoning. Reasoning (or things that look and quack like reasoning) is more the domain of 70B+ models, and some of the newer 7B models.

The model is doing well on many reasoning tasks, what they are doing is a massive step up from llama-8b. But it still makes some silly mistakes. I bet if you did the same finetuning procedure with quen-7B or llama-70B as a starting point you would get a quite competent model
For instance, ARC prize now at human level… https://x.com/akyurekekin/status/1855680785715478546

I dont know why it seems bold. So many signs.
There's a certain frustration to being told your condition is a "lifestyle issue" by someone with absolutely no knowledge of your lifestyle. In my original post I linked an Imperial College paper about a potential mechanism for permanent testestorone reduction after COVID due to death of GnRH system neurons. What lifestyle change do you propose that would cause these to regrow?
For readers, at time of posting, something went weird with the tags for the footnotes for footnote #2 not escaping correctly, so a lot of the article continues after footnote #3.
they didn't
On GNOME one been using https://github.com/neffo/bing-wallpaper-gnome-extension and it doesn't seem to contain any malware.
Yes, this is absolutely a risk. Not one that matters to me, but something anybody considering it should be aware of.