skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
But it is partly "just the times". There's a dividing line in 1977 called Star Wars. Before Star Wars it was much more common for science fiction films to use long establishing sequences of especially space technology. For a 1960s audience when the actual moon landings were fresh to mind, the long, slow ballet of space was very palpable and appreciable. Star Wars changed a lot of things for scifi, including reducing some of those establishing sequences to their quickest and most basic. It is harder to appreciate something like 2001 on this side of Star Wars. Scifi movies have been trying to mostly be "the next Star Wars" for almost every decade since, with few exceptions, many of which don't always do well in the box office (Tron is a cult favorite, but early theatrical audiences found it slow; Star Trek: The Motion Picture is often considered a bomb by Star Trek standards for being a pre-Star Wars sort of movie released two years after Star Wars; Gravity and Interstellar both got accolades in somewhat recent years for mostly sort of getting away with pre-Star Wars scifi pacing, but partly got away with it from Brand Name stars and directors and a focus on IMAX tech and spectacle).

2001 didn't feel out of place versus scifi movies of its time. It feels slow and ponderous post-Star Wars.
I figure we'd all just go to the country side, where people still have houses with chimneys that use wood for heat, and hope we fit.
I hope this doesn't lead distros to drop gtk2 libraries. There are still many programs beyond gimp that use them. But without a big name like gimp to justify their continued packaging we may lose them.
Linux C style guide has this summarized pretty well:

"The maximum length of a function is inversely proportional to the complexity and indentation level of that function. So, if you have a conceptually simple function that is just one long (but simple) case-statement, where you have to do lots of small things for a lot of different cases, it’s OK to have a longer function.

However, if you have a complex function, and you suspect that a less-than-gifted first-year high-school student might not even understand what the function is all about, you should adhere to the maximum limits all the more closely."

"Less-than-gifted first-year student" is btw a great bar for the conceptual complexity. Another one I've seen elsewhere is "An SRE not familiar with the code woken up at 3 AM to troubleshoot an outage".
Both kinds of batteries. The rechargeable battery one no longer recharged. The others buttons stopped working mechanically.
Wind resistance is the primary force slowing you down at speeds where riders care about such things. The tiny micro-accelerations after every dead zone add up in spent calories when you have a more massive bike+rider system.
A component of fair use is to what degree the derivative work displaces the original. Google's argument has always been that they direct traffic to the original, whereas AI summaries (which Google of course is just as guilty of as openai) completely obsoletes the original publication. The argument now is that the derivative work (LLM model) is transformative, ie, different enough that it doesn't economically compete with the original. I think it's a losing argument but we'll see what the courts arrive at.
My only-mostly-joking answer is that you can go work for a typical Silicon Valley style technology company, and stay around for two or three four-year vesting periods. Most of them have Google-influenced design doc processes, and few if any have a process for documenting what actually got built, much less what it eventually turned into.

One of my hobbies is feeling dumb for not understanding something, being willing to ask, realizing _nobody_ knows the big picture, and trying to document it.

tbh though I have also occasionally fantasized about finding a job that was _only_ software archeology.
Write-Once, Read Many drives also prevent tampering. Not everything needs crypto.
> SPAs solved a problem no one had

The problem was: can we make the same data APIs to serve the web and mobile apps?
Every big company lobbies politically, usually on both sides of the aisle. And their employees often make their own campaign bribes too. And to some extent they will all do some virtue signaling (supporting their choice of LGB/trans/law enforcement/women/2nd amendment/minorities/whatever). Most of that is just whatever... people shop at Amazon, Home Depot, Meta, Google, Chick-filet, Walmart, Hobby Lobby, whatever, and they all have their values...

But... very very few of those companies are led by an outspoken unfiltered CEO with their own social media. Even Zucky doesn't go way out of his way to broadcast his political agenda on his social media platforms. Musk is unique in that way. And Musk has also flip-flopped somewhat, from being somewhat liberal (though barely) in the past to being burned by California politics and then shifting ultra-right these days. So people who bought their Tesla thinking he was a liberal or at least neutral, well, they're stuck with their cars even after Musk changed his tune.
We’re running standard Prometheus on Kubernetes (14 onprem Talos clusters, total of 191 nodes, 1.1k cpu cores, 4.75TiB memory and 4k pods). We use Thanos to store metrics in self-hosted S3 (seaweedfs) with 30 days retention, aggressively downsample after 3 days.

It works pretty good tbh. I’m excited about upgrading to version 3, as is does take a lot of resources to keep going, especially on clusters with a lot of pods being spawned all the time.
This becomes a race to the bottom quickly. Why should the government invest any money at all in new york or california if that same dollar goes so much further doing literally anything at all in omaha or detroit? Its cheaper after all no?
> No, it doesn't rely on you knowing the recipient.

The point is not that you need to know the recipient, but that if you don’t know them you can’t say if they will enjoy this kind of humour or not.

I know people for whom such a letter would be the highlight of their day. I know people who would be worried about it for days if not weeks. Without knowing your audience you can’t know who will react how.

> Is it worth the risk that someone would find it "incredibly bad taste" (parent post, not yours)?

Is it? Depends on how much you care how much you care about being an asshole accidentally.

I have friends who we play pranks on each other where we sneak up on the other and do a jumpscare. Would never do the same with a random person though.

This is the equivalent action, but instead of threatening people with bodily harm it is threatening them in a legal/bureaucratic way.

> Obviously humour is subjective

Yes.

> perhaps such people need to have their Sense of Humour shifted, Overton-window style

Or maybe your sense of empathy needs adjusting. The problem is not with their sense of humour but with their sense of “how likely it is that an official looking letter is bringing ruin on me”. I’m glad that you feel secure enough that you can’t even understand that feeling.
In development since mid-2012, too. One has to wonder if it'll ever be released. It might be more profitable to keep kicking the can down the road.
I can mirror what their docs say

> Using CREG (Code Review Emoji Guide) puts more ownership on the reviewer to give the reviewee added context and clarity to follow up on code review. For example, knowing whether something really requires action (), highlighting nit-picky comments (), flagging out of scope items for follow-up () and clarifying items that don’t necessarily require action but are worth saying ( , , )
PIPs are a double edged blade. If the worker passes the pip, but regresses immediately, then we can't just keep yo-yoing with multiple pips per year.

So unfortunately, this means when an EM creates a PIP, to prevent Yo-Yoing, they need you to leave.
I get it, but you'll get a lost of false positives as well. My experience is that they also had slow customer service.

I don't want any business critical infra managed by a company willing to be that aggressive in blocking accounts, while also having slow customer service to resolve access issues.
"Your" got editorialized away and the title became quite categorical. Implying all of them kill morale and are flawed.
What leads you to believe that Logic has been shedding users? What little information I can find on this suggests that Logic has in fact been growing slightly & has significant market share. I also think it’s a huge driver of Mac sales.
Yes. This is a dead giveaway that the author is not a native English speaker. And overall it gives the project a mid vibe.
Thanks. Feel free to suggest a PR.
Nation/culture != the current regime
Whether something is boxed or not is relevant in practice for performance. It's reasonable to have a jargon where products, records, and structs are distinct concepts.
TTY, console, shell, stdin/out, buffer, pipe, I wish there was a clear explanation somewhere of how all of those are glue/work together.
In my opinion not a lawyer, Google at least references where they obtained the data and did not regurgitate it as if they were the creators that created something new. obfuscated plagiarism via LLM. Some claim derivative works but I have always seen that as quite a stretch. People here expect me to cite references yet LLM's somehow escape this level of scrutiny.
Does HN allow ads? Even if so, this ad for what's essential a list to spam is dodgy.
Simple Sabotage for the 21st Century – Specific Suggestions
Is this specific to AI or specific to summaries in general? Do summaries, like the ones found in Wikipedia or Cliffs Notes, not have the same effect of making it such that people no longer have to view the original work as much?

Note: do you mean the model is transformative, or the summaries are transformative? I think your comment holds up either way but I think it's better to be clear which one you mean.
Dictating to trans people about _how they get to live_ is the process of saying they can't co-exist in this world. It is the insinuation that they are _separate but equal_.

We've been through this ride before. We're going through this ride again. Bigots, like that author, will lose and history will not look kindly upon them.

However, for now, they get to act as an "enlightened rationalist", and sell books to people so people can justify their discomfort against trans folks.

These enlightened rationalists aren't new. Again, I'm saying that what history provides us is seeing the patterns of behavior and speech.

--

Let me more specifically target that tweet you've sent. Trans people make up such a small number of people, and an even smaller percentage of those would be interested in professional sports. Spending this much time having a moral freakout over this, when there's practically no "unfairness" happening in any mainstream sports is telling.

This moral outrage has now led to invasive "tests" women have to go through before they participate in multiple sports at an international level. This outrage has caused a proliferation of false claims lodged against women who just, simply do well in sports and don't fall within the very subjectively defined "gender identity".

For example, what Imane Khelif went through is a damned outrage. Has this author taken responsibility of what their rhetoric might mean to so called "real women" that he's claiming to be so supportive of?

--

Now as for the language. As society shifts, and attitudes towards culture changes, our language also changes. It wasn't that far ago where words like the n-word were very common place in American culture. Now, if you're using that you will be considered a bigot. If I'm to take this author at face value, that's somehow supposedly a bad thing?

This is similar to actively, and maliciously, misgendering someone. It's just not reached that level of understanding in society yet.

Language is a living and breathing thing. The meanings of words change over time. How acceptable a phrase is changes over time. Folks crying about this are, at best just scared of change, at worst trying to monetize other folks' fear of change. I believe this author falls into the latter here.

--

It's not just his tweets, he's set his career around this issue (https://youtu.be/WDFXPlv-R_s). For someone who wants to be less _social justice_, he sure spends a lot of time talking about issues that ultimately are not relevant for 99% of the population, and is just part of the culture war himself.
This highlights something very important to me that sometimes gets lost when thinking about the tooling and that is the human element and the importance of communication, existing relationships, and rapport. The PR feedback I give and receive is extremely influenced by the relationship I have with the person - for some PRs any nit pick feels frustrating but I have other coworkers that can slam my code and even pepper in insults but our relationship lets me read it in the jocular and secretly constructive way it is intended.

The code is the same way and there was a great comment higher up about an ignored lint rule being an indicator of someone thinking about it and making a judgement call that this time the rule shouldn't apply. I have SOME peers where that my reading of that line of code and others where my assumption is the opposite and they were just lazy or didn't know how to do it "the right way". It's the same line of code!

I don't know how tooling will ever replace this part so I think it's important to keep it as the bedrock of any collaboration process.
They're salting the earth / destroying the moat for OpenAI and Anthropic, and to a lesser extent, for Google. Basically, now pretty much anyone can do "sufficient" AI right in their garage. I use Mistral Large, and most of the time its output is easily on par with GPT4, with total privacy. This destruction of the moat prevents the future where e.g. OpenAI becomes your interface to the internet, recommendations, shopping, social media, news, etc. The moment you start doing something that's clearly valuable, 10 other companies pop up and destroy your potential future margin. They are trying the "internet search" part of that, because that needs a search index, and that's not something that's easy to do. We're lucky that Google blew its AI lead so badly - it _could_ realistically become all of the above, if it wasn't so badly mismanaged.
> Creating multiple shared albums, and sharing each album individually, manually, every single time, is super cumbersome.

Yes, this, sorry. I meant just having a "myorg+socialmedia@gmail.com" account, and sharing all the shared albums to that one user. The social media person always logs in with that account and they can see all the shared albums. But yeah, you do have to share all the albums with them individually (unless they're always of the same people/pets, in which case you can use the "partner sharing" AI stuff too which works maybe 80% of the time).
Today is Buy Nothing Day.[1] Don't shop.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buy_Nothing_Day
It's a human right. Some principles are so fundamental that they supercede governments and so-called norms, and free speech is one of those. You don't have to be religious to know that these rights are as fundamental to human life as breathing and something worth fighting for, rather than something that we merely practice at the pleasure of some privileged people who think they're better than us.
It would make sense from a legal standpoint, but I don't think they could do that without massively regressing their models performance to the point that it would jeopardize their viability as a company.
Specifically regarding at-will employment and the United States, you can still be sued for discrimination based on race, gender, and all other protected classes. PIPs and other similar processes are primarily created, from a legal/HR perspective, to protect against those lawsuits.

So, somewhat counterintuitively, at-will employment in the United States(especially in states like California) is not actually at-will in a practical sense do to the threat of discrimination lawsuits.
Evolution of the Storage Engine for Spanner, an Exabyte-Scale DB System [video]
What we really need to become as prepared as we once was is mandatory conscription. It used to cover almost all men, today I think it covers 7-8 percent of those in the right age. Without having seen the defense from the inside, it must feel foreign and abstract. But it concerns us all and should not be something for a just a few.
you and the us navy

https://news.usni.org/2019/08/09/navy-reverting-ddgs-back-to...

they ripped out the GUI-based controls after a bad crash

(actual story is more complicated though -- they transferred partial control of the helm to another station, instead of transferring full control, leading the new operator to think they had lost control of the boat. similar thing happened with air france 447 where a single pilot panicked and the others couldn't observe their control input)
I hate to write this, but what if instead of writing it yourself, you would ask ChatGPT to do it for you, and instead of documenting the code, you would archive and document your prompts for the future maintainer?
Would two environments both with no refined adictive additive create a similat conclusion about interesting vs boring environments similar to what the authors claim? I have no idea, so I just read a poor summary of a typical rat addiction study.
Want to go full physics nerd? Sailing can be described in terms of reference frames. While to an outside observer a sailboat can travel about 45 upwind, from the boat's reference frame one must add the forward speed to the wind vector, putting the "apparant wind" much closer to directly ahead. A modern sailcraft like a windsurfer really does feel as if its travelling directly into the wind, or is making its own wind. Going almost as fast as a car, hovering above the waves, directly into the wind, feels like magic because it basically is.

https://youtu.be/1VoGXcj4nvc

(Note how the real magic starts when they switch to the windsurfer's reference frame.)
I wish there was a game that did this on purpose. You are given an undocumented alien half-broken contraption and your goal is to repurpose it for something different.

Space Station 13 was a little bit like that sometimes.
Just to confirm, you mean the one in Mountain View, right? Or is there another one in Palo Alto?
Ensemble with coder-instruct
Then, simply, don't use Mr with them.

You're going to be called bigoted because that's simply where culture is heading. You either own up to that judgement others have of you, or you realize you live in a society and certain behaviors are _not okay_.

You have the freedom to be _subjectively_ a bigot.
In my experiences with them, prior to high school they just amount to a few additional worksheets on top of existing assigned work. In elementary school, my girls were pulled out for about an hour a day to go to another room for their "advanced" classes. There was no advanced instruction. Just more math worksheets. It's not really until high school where you have real AP classes that involve actual teaching and not just isolation from the rest of the kids. My experience was much the same, but I actively didn't have friends so enjoyed the isolation at the cost of a few worksheets. They did nothing to actually help us "advance" though.
Re-training can be done, but, and it is not a small but, models already do exist and can be used locally suggesting that the milk has been spilled for too long at this point. Separately, neutering them effectively lowers their value as opposed to their non-neutered counterparts.
This type of argument is ignorant, cowardly, shortsighted, and regressive. Both technology and society will progress when we find a formula that is sustainable and incentivizes everyone involved to maximize their contributions without it all blowing up in our faces someday. Copyright law is far from perfect, but it protects artists who want to try and make a living from their work, and it incentivizes creativity that places without such protections usually end up just imitating.

When we find that sustainable framework for AI, China or <insert-boogeyman-here> will just end up imitating it. Idk what harms you're imagining might come from that ("get ahead" is too vague to mean anything), but I just want to point out that that isn't how you become a leader in anything. Even worse, if they are the ones who find that formula first while we take shortcuts to "get ahead", then we will be the ones doing the imitation in the end.
I would trust AI a lot more if it gave answers more like:

“Source A on date 1 said XYX”

“Source B …”

“Synthesizing these, it seems that the majority opinion is X but Y is also a commonly held opinion.”

Instead of what it does now, which is make extremely confident, unsourced statements.

It looks like the copyright lawsuits are rent-seeking as much as anything else; another reason I hate copyright in its current form.
'organized -- chaotic' and 'all screen -- no screen' are truly the main axes of UI design
Your ideal job for utilizing both would either be to work for one of the ERP providers or accounting software providers (Oracle, NetSuite, Workday, Xero, etc.) or to launch your own targeting a specific need.
In mandatory conscription armies, soldiers deliberately miss the shots because nobody wants to suffer from remorse
Here's a resource for at least the first one: https://www.linusakesson.net/programming/tty/
Most states in the United States will still provide unemployment payments for an employee terminated for performance.

The company needs to prove a gross negligence level of employee conduct to deny unemployment. Things like not showing up to work or workplace sabotage.
It's good practice to not editorialize the title when making a submission. You could misread many titles to mean something else, it's sort of a hidden assumption that you should read the article before commenting on it.
All major AV deployments have human backup. Waymo published how their's works in broad terms: If a situation requires intervention, the human backup is presented with a choice among possible actions.

What remote monitors imply depends: In China, you might be focusing on collecting data from rides that may need a lot of remote monitoring. Or, faking it until you make it. If you are Google and you like headcount minimalism, it shows you have confidence you can spend $5B on expanding AV service without blowing out you headcount. Tesla also likes to keep headcount low. So they think they can catch up to Waymo very quickly.
WebRTC doesn't need it either in principle. The stun server is only to exchange IP addresses for the purpose of hole punching through NATs.

Even in p2p implementations that use kademlia, you need a way to figure out hole punching. In IPFS, while there is a decentralised hole punching method as an alternative to a centralised STUN server, it requires atleast one participant to not be behind a NAT, so for this purpose it's besides the point.
Do you have the correct issue that one could follow since 6440 isn't it?

Also, since you're here: is it just a matter of glucose, and thus if someone were to port it to GTK4 that patch would be accepted, or it's quite literally "no user cares about library versions"?
Everything is the same as everything else if you rewrite all the words to different words. Regardless, "right to exist in the world" is a patently disingenuous description of the rights in question.