skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
From the docs: "The add operation runs in amortized constant time, that is, adding n elements requires O(n) time".

Given the linear time time complexity, it seems obvious that adding a thread pointer to the list won't contribute substantially to the thread creation time.

The way these kinds of operations can be implemented for amortized linear time (also in Python, C realloc, etc) is explained in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_array#Geometric_expans...
“A rotor spinning one Way/DesxtroGiro, and the inside rotor flow Goes VS in the other at front against contrary/LevoGiro"
But the Blades (with the Gear) move in favor at that circumstances. Thats why is possible. The Interaction of two forces to make One.
That Particular Mechanics Technique Goes increasing Two forces in One: Force1/Rotor-DextroGiro VS Force2/inFlow-LevoGiro. front to Front = Retrodynamic.

*

·RETRODYNAMIC Effect / Some Points of View:

I always explain it well, but another thing is that you don't understand it.
As if it were an everyday question.

And they don't take it as a disruption, which changes schemes.

Because they really wouldn't even know about it. Being a subject that nobody has ever really dealt with.

*

And also to you can see it as an encrypted information.
And I know the best translator, for sure.
And they don't take it as a disruption, which changes schemes.
Because they really wouldn't even know about it. Being a subject that nobody has ever really dealt with.
But the concept it's a simple sum, then keep going to increase the phenomenal interaction.
Let me make a simple caparison: One Turn is One step, OK, Well in this particular case.
When you do One Turn is One Step, And Then is another turn are gone to be Two Steps.
And in the next turn are gone to be Four steps, And the next Turn are gone to be 8 Steps. Etc...
Really too to be able to explain it, needs to invent a new Mathematical Signal. Brand New.
I Tell You. It’s Like That.
I'm going to explain them perfectly well. We are going to make a comparison that each turn of the Rotor (applied in my case/Gearturbine) is a Step. It's fine. And So now when the rotor rotates with the power of the mechanical drive (Action). And furthermore, it has the internal flow contrary to its rotation (Reaction), but in favor of the individual blade attached to the gear with planetary rotation that activates the Rotor. In such a case they are two forces in a single system.

*

Maybe it doesn't have the best translation, but that's something else, that's not the point. But that would in no way be something that could belittle his qualities and technical virtues. And at the end of the day, all the explanations you can have are in the operation of the system. And this could not be easier to appreciate, Summed up in a simple sum. And in this case of 2Two Forces: 1Action + 2Reaction Applied in a single cycle, and thus also a single system.

·A) 1Action VS/+ 2Reaction = ?
·B) 1DestroGiro VS/+ 2Levogiro = ?
·C)1Rotary Move VS/+ 2InFlow Way = ?

Note: ·I use the "VS" Because the dynamic interaction is front to front, that's why.
·And is Added force one to the other, that's why I use the Sume/Plus mathematical symbol.
·A, B, and C are the same situation with a different word, from a different, technical view.

Other Note: If somebody doesn't understand Cut be because of some reason. Not because my responsibility.
VLIW is still in use in multiple DSP products on the market today, and they are good successful products in their niche.

They work very well if your code can be written as a loop without branches (or very limited branches) in the body, and a lot of instruction level parallelism in the body.

Unfortunately for Intel, most code doesn't look like that. But for most workloads that happen to also be a good case for SIMD, it is (can be) great.
My strategy was interest income + indie business income. I went full time indie once my interest and dividend income was a few thousand per month.
I'm not sure this is helpful - please see my other reply.

From https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.
I deal with the Requirements of a new mathematical symbol, in order to explain the Retrodynamic Phenomenon Effect, that occurs in an invention that I am developing. It is called the "Retrodynamic Effect" and it is created by having a situation of an axis turning in the opposite direction in a rotating system and in this way a great force is created. And there is currently no mathematical symbol that can explain it.

*

The Mathematical/Physical Symbol. What is required for the Explanation and Application in the Formula of the Retrodynamic Effect. Which has the quality of being applied in the Gear Turbine Project. What would it be to join the Symbols of ·1- (+) Addition and ·2- (X) Multiplication. It would be a Symbol with 8 Eight Points: 4 four of the symbol of + addition and four of the symbol of X multiplication. This is because it is a sum that continues to repeat the 2 Two forces the Action/RightRotation and the Reaction/Levorotation. The 2 Two Forces uniting, increasing each other into one. And is called “MULTIPLUS”. And in this way increasing its Power considerably. a sum that is multiplied and/or a multiplication that is added. When Active of the Rotor/action of the system and the internal flow/reaction that does it in the opposite way (in favor at the Blades circular move. Thats Why) applying in the individual vane connected next to its partner Gear internally fit in a planetary way internally in the casing, in this way. This is because that is how it works, they are the union and interaction of two forces face to face, front to front and therefore two symbols. DextroGiro and/or LevoGiro. Action And/or Reaction. + and/or X.

*

It is not a single Force/Action to consider. But rather there are 2 Forces/Action and Reaction. And the interaction of one with/against another. With Opposite Directions, face to face/front to front. One against the other. And this interaction continues to increase progressively. One to other/Action to Reaction.
More than the question is the answer. Being that traditionally in a conventional system a single total power is considered. In this particular case there are two; action and reaction. And their interaction continues and continues to increase with each other. In such a way it would be that turning the force increases from 1 to 2, from 2 to 4, from 4 to 8, from 8 to 16, from 16 to 32, etc...

*

The system could not be simpler in its application and operation. Of what it already is. So does His verification. And what has been said here can be seen in the drawings presented. And the dynamics that the direction of the arrows indicates. This is The Rotation of the Rotor and its internal flow. / Dextrogiro VS Levogiro.

*

It is very simple. It only follows the direction of the internal flow of the Rotor.
Which is projected into the Receiver with its companion gear rotates in a planetary manner within the casing. The movement of the internal flow is opposite to that of the Rotor. In such a way they are two forces that their interaction is the sum of the two forces in a system.
In fact, `tail -f | grep` works the way they expect. What doesn’t work is `tail -f | grep | grep`.

It’s hard to argue that grep isn’t supposed to work like this when grep tries to work like this. It’s not a fundamental tension, it’s just that isatty(stdout) doesn’t always tell you when you’re running in an interactive terminal.
My first reaction is to wonder what the downside of such a gene is. Perhaps there is no downside for the individuals that have it, but these individuals serve a particular purpose to the greater civilization and lack other capabilities that benefit humanity as a whole. If there is a trade-off perhaps it is not at the individual level.

Maybe it's similar to the idea that we can just eradicate mosquitos with no negative effects. Is that really true?
Should you be fired or medical leave?
Does that matter though? At some point someone's assigning them a legal age so you can decide if they're over 16 or under 18, or over 21 etc. Your real age doesn't matter. And why would it not be able to be corrected later? Another advantage of a digital ID
I used to switch to a new account when I gained privilege to do extra voting, or extra down voting. I switched to a new account on slashdot a few times, after gaining enough karma for whatever extra they allowed. I did it here on HN, back in 2012.
I wonder it I have this…

Both my parents go to bed around 1am and wake up at 7am, and so did all of my grandparents. My kids on weekends go to bed around 1-2am as well but do sleep in, and my average is about 4-5 hours a night…

As for me, I’ve had sleep issues all my life and found the only way to fall asleep within 20 minutes is to stay up until exhaustion. But lately I’ve been gaining back my time and pushing even further - once every one or two weeks I’ll skip a night of sleeping, staying up around 36 hours straight. I’ve been doing this for a few months now and have zero side effects so far. In fact I end up sleeping over 10 hours the next day without waking up in the middle (which /never/ happens otherwise).
That's a pretty egregious mistake for a designer to make -- and that's not even mentioning the lack of accessibility. WebAIM's contrast checker says it's a 1:1 contrast ratio!

If someone is releasing a model that claims to have a level of reasoning, one would hope that their training dataset was scrutinized and monitored for unintended bias (as any statistical dataset is susceptible to: see overfitting). But if the graph on the announcement page is literally unreadable to seemingly anyone but the creator... that's damning proof that there is little empathy in the process, no?
I know that this is a typical test of an LLM's ability to reason, but I wonder how much time could be saved by teaching an LLM how to recognise the type of problem that it's inherently bad at, bundling a python interpreter and asking it to to write a short function to solve the problem? Are we not pushing a boulder uphill?
why do you say "just" a wrapper? it is not a bad thing to be a wrapper, it is just a descriptive term

the amount of code does not dictate whether or not it is a wrapper.
You are continuously wrong about bitcoin. It's embarassing now.
An NYPD officer? Scaremongering? Perish the thought.

I'd actually expect the 15-round magazines to be more common, given that's the size of magazine the Glock 19 comes with, and they don't stick out of the gun. But then again I'm not convinced any of these guys are carrying more than one magazine anyway (and if they were, they'd be too busy fumbling around in the dark getting the magazine out of their pockets- it's not like gangsters even know magazine holders even exist).

However, if you're using OEM Glock mags, it's not going to jam (don't buy SGM or Promag, not only are they garbage but they aren't even that much cheaper- which, to be fair, gangsters probably think all 'stendos are the same and would thus run into that problem more), and you literally cannot hold enough rounds on your person to make the gun overheat, especially if you're not wearing a competition-style belt designed to hold a bunch of mags. But then again, if your Glawk Fowtay Problem Solva can't solve the problem in 300 rounds you are probably doing something wrong.
> "the guy who crosses the whole city has gotten more value out of the metro system than the guy who goes one stop."

Not necessarily. The value you receive from a transportation service is mostly a function how badly you want/need to be at the destination, as well as things like how comfortable and fast the ride is. If anything, the guy travelling a shorter distance got more value because his ride took less time!

Or to put it another way, there is little value to me in travelling a long, laborious route all the way across the city if I don't have a pressing need to be at that destination. But if I need to be at work in 30 minutes I get huge value from taking the metro to the nearby station, even if it's only 2 stops away.
Can anyone recommend good learning material for the non-tech part? I'm good at building stuff, but not on the other parts.
Love the auto connection graphics choices :)
Really great talk! I have so much love for the demoscene and how constraints like retro hardware or executable size pushes people to do amazing things like this!

Great post! Shame it fell off the frontpage I reckon!
I hate semicolons. They are such visual garbage, and mental overhead for having to type them. Many languages are successful without them. Good on you for ditching them.
I think sadly to that point there’s no solution given because there isn’t one. And the ones that promise it (RN) still has you doing tons of platform specific code and in some cases supporting even more platforms than just going native.
You've posted the same link 3 times over the course of a few months, but it's always the one linking to the luxury auction. Why are you doing that?

The actual link for what you titled this is https://news.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20241128050067
There's an easter egg :)
Is NuScale’s design a good one to compare against? Isn’t it a theoretical design only?

I held their stock for a while until I realized they don’t exist to make a reactor. They exist to get funding.

Sounds crazy, but look through their actions. All press releases are just talk about what they will research and with whom they talked or made a “memorandum of understanding”. The CEO CV is also interesting since it lists a whole lot of board positions and titles but it’s not clear what he has actually done.
It’s property law 101 that possession and ownership are not the same thing.
We could be sleeping less to do more fun stuff, no?
> teaching an LLM how to recognise the type of problem that it's inherently bad at

Solving this is the actual hard part and is either adjacent to or even equivalent to solving the problem of LLM's hallucinating. ChatGPT already includes a Python interpreter tool which can be used if the context indicates its appropriate.
You can't be more wrong. You're saying that only logic performed on the client side can be considered an application? State can be stored in the server. Screen changes can be done by loading html, it doesn't need a framework. React is far from crucial for web development, but people haven't learned anything else the last decade. Most front end developers these days don't even know what a template engine is, and some don't even know how to create a website without a backend rest api that spews json data.
Covering yourself shows leadership you may have what it takes to cover the company if you got more power. The greater the position the more covering you will do.
Local Access is a very different issue, and I dont really disagree - but the local copper loop being broadband is an accident and one of technological evolution.

When the decisions were made about divesiture, that bit was non obvious.
I try not to use AI when learning a new language. I don't want to rely on premade answers to my problem. I prefer using the language's documentation and some light SO searching so I can figure it out on my own. AI is the last resort for me when learning something new.
I would say:

Community > Company

In fact, after what Sun/Oracle did to Java, people should be skeptical if a language was not community run
Nothing is something
> pay that exceeds half a million dollar a year would put them in the top 1% of earners in 32 out of 50 states

I'm honestly kind of shocked that a half a million dollars per year is insufficient to be in the top 1% of earners in 18 states.
Manufacturer did something with intent to damage someone else's property. Seems to fit the definition to me.
GTK 3.0 was released in 2011 and it was announced a few years before that, probably in 2009. So whoever down voted, the 90s weren't 10 years ago...
There maybe a misunderstanding here. The only debt I talked about was referring to carbon. We are enabling our current lifestyles by taking on carbon debt, which we will pay in climate change unless we pay off the principal (sequestration). You were speculating that some unknown future tech could make paying off that debt easier and cheaper, and I was pointing out that taking on debt without a current method of repayment is unwise. Since you appear hesitant about excess government debt I would expect you to be More not Less hesitant of debt we have no acceptable way to payoff, yet we are taking on more and more.
> In 1970, Congress took their anti-smoking initiative one step further and passed the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act, banning the advertising of cigarettes on television and radio starting on 2 January 1971. In April 1970, President Nixon signed it into law.

Can you guys research this stuff before posting, please?
It's an article about a fast build system, why wouldn't it be about build latency?
If you're targeting Go to cross-compile to, why would you build the language in Rust? Keeping to the go tool chain would reduce a lot of friction for those who are using go already, which I presume is a significant chunk of your target audience.
> that the Go team exhibits engineering genius, taste, and particularity that is rare to find in our industry

Those geniuses fought against implementing generics for almost 10 years.
And it doesn’t even have to be that. Just someone at the wrong end from a cell phone tower or in a clogged one from a sports event or something.
> Absolutely: if copyright is slowing down innovation, we should abolish copyright.

Is this sarcasm?
> You can't really blame the mega-corporations without also blaming the people that voted for kakistocracy

In the context of what democracy ought to mean, you are of course correct.

In the context of who now really operates the levers using historically unprecedented stockpiles of cash, I think the notion of blaming the voter is a quaint allusion to a bygone era (of democracy).
Is this in anyway related or inspired by ComfyUI
Yes for all senses of the word. Moreover, first firearms were really hand cannons on a stick. Look at the picture in the article, it was a rifle-sized weapon mounted on a swivel.
> You seem to be ignorant of how badly democracy worked in the Weimar Republic

And whose fault is that? If you fail to fix your country political system for long enough - you get dictatorship and eventually war. There's nobody responsible for it other than citizens of that country.

Whose fault is it that USA democracy is turning into oligarchy? Politicians - sure, but these politicians keep getting elected despite gerrymandering, taking billions in "lobbying" for tax cuts, openly lying, ignoring obvious systemic problems, etc.

Whose fault is it, that Putin could invade Ukraine and kill hundreds of thousands of people? Regular Russians had a faulty democracy and decided to do nothing as it was dismantled step by step. Now they are sent to die murdering innocent people.

Ultimately you can't escape the responsibility for your country. If you did nothing - you're an accomplice.
like node-red?
Well I just learned that subsea cables are privatized!
Having a successful startup is like winning the lottery too. Getting funded if you are not in a circle of reputation is like winning the lottery. Getting into ycombinator is like winning a lottery then you get to win another.

Any business is like a lottery.
But some have better odds like setting up a plumbing service in a growing underserved town.
I have seen a lot of large projects do this but don’t keep a list. The ones that remember from recently reading about them is Discord and IndexedDB.
That sounds old 2ch.net. Was that plan from Hiroyuki, by chance? IIRC they entrusted the key to kingdom to that guy, or am I mistaken...
Thoughts on the software industry (2022)
It’s a lot bigger than Singles Day. In Germany if you work in e-commerce it’s the busiest time of the year.
Kotlin so crazy with its default-closed, default-final method approach. Do these people even ship software? Or do they ship textbooks? People are acting likely they are writing chapters of Biblical verse with their code—they knew everything better than the user, including knowing what to hide. It’s OK/good to have extensible code, even if the original did not intend it.

To have every class be final by default and hidden from callers might be sane for shipping a library—-but you definitely should not adopt it as internal policy in your own code base, for your own’s sake. Why should I tax myself with having to worry about calling out extensibility by hand at every step? This is just crazy to me!

I’m all for Kotlin’s success as we desperately need something better than Java still. I’m rooting for you.

The lock-in with Go is the massive copy-pasta style and throw-away code mindset that is pretty much all that I see. But there is very little good Go code out in the wild to show us how it’s done.
Some muddled thinking in this reaction piece. If the charge of the ECB is to maintain price stability, and the speech by Lagarde is about reinsurance, then the story should be the increase in losses due to natural events. And how the ECB promotes insurance as the remedy to how nature affects prices.
You still can have seen Android from 5 years ago experience. There's lots of custom ROMs for that. On the other hand, for an average person, I believe Android is better today in most ways.
Go where the normies are and speak to them in the medium they understand.
And here is the bcachefs ban hammer https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-CoC-Bcachefs-6.13
for a full release cycle. They are accepting bugs in a file system for insulting a stupid developer, who suggested to let the kernel crash on errors.
A time traveler would've likely had his stuff stolen, or the grave pillaged. Probably easier to check what kind of dental work they had.
Conceptually regulation is "not very complicated".

1. Bring back those laws requiring fairness of media representation.

2. Force standardized disclosure of sponsored content of any type (total, segments, placement). Many countries already do this. Standardized = big, high contrast "Ad" sign in the corner with mandatory size proportional to content size.

3. Mandate providing sources.

4. Treat all influencers with an audience above NNN followers (10000?) as mass media.

5. Require that widely shared content is fact checked and that fact checking is automatically included while sharing and provide recourse for fact checking up to the legal system.

6. For sensitive topics (politics, primarily) require AML and KYC disclosures of funding, primarily to find foreign funding sources and propaganda.

However, you know, vested interests, the bane of humanity.
Jas – My X64 Assembler
Hey all! Hope everyone is doing well!

So, lately (for the past year or so) I've been learning some basic concepts of the x86 family's instructions and the ELF object file format as a side project. Now I wrote a library that compiles some basic instructions down into a raw ELF binary that ld is willing chew up and for it to spit out an executable file for. The Jas assembler allows computer and low-level enthusiasts to quickly and easily whip out a simple compiler without the hassle of a large and complex library like LLVM. Using my library, I've already written some pretty cool projects such as a very very simple brain f*ck compiler in less than 1MB that compiles down to a x64 ELF object file - Check it out here https://github.com/cheng-alvin/brainfry

Feel free to contribute to the repo: https://github.com/cheng-alvin/jas

Join the discord as well! https://discord.gg/Qncj5RJbfK

Thanks, Alvin
There's a plausible hypothesis that sleep is the thing that evolved precisely to stop us doing things for any more time than is strictly necessary. That is, sleeping is safe.
Devdocs is just a collection of official documentations. GP wants a collection of documentation that explains comparative, idiomatic problem solving in each language. How are they even remotely similar?