skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Especially if you have a mix of "old" procedural and modern OO php

I guess thats a result of such wildly changing features in each version change. Each major version of PHP has brought in such drastic changes of concept and semantic that it is easy to start mixing them together and get confused looking code.

However I find this in a lot of other systems. Look at node.js, every release changes things so much that people regularly rewrite their entire code base multiple times to take advantages of the new features. Do a google search for guides on node programming a specific issue, and depending on how old it is it you will get wildly differnt approches and results. Popular and highly developed languages change often, and this will always cause issues between old and new.
Nuclear war with whom?
Could be helpful will try it
"if not defined" doesn't help, if your own `array_find` doesn't have the same signature and semantics than the new global then you're screwed. You'd want the opposite: overwrite it if it already exists in the global scope (dunno if that's easy / how that'd work in PHP)
I use Jetbrains and there is at least full coverage for MSSQL in my experience, which is a huge dialect -- not only syntax highlighting but full IDE features like autocompletion and target name refactoring etc.

And 10 other dialects are listed..
Support: 31 Dec 2026

Security: 31 Dec 2028

Bug Fixes: 31 Dec 2026

From https://www.php.net/supported-versions.php
Or use a touchscreen in combo with the mouse -- touch for simple button pushing or gestures. Works great on my laptop, I use the trackpoint stick, trackpad, and touchscreen for various tasks whichever one makes the most sense at the moment.
> I guess rustc detects the situations in which the linker would throw an error and then throws its own error preemptively.

Pretty much. The crucial difference between C and Rust which enables Rust to do this sort of detection is that in Rust, the extern things are anchored in modules (crates? whatever), and so when you import things, you have to say where you are importing them from.

extern void *magic_init(int);
extern void *magic_stuff(void*, const char*, int);
extern void magic_fini(void*);

versus

use crate_of_magic::{init, stuff, fini};

It even enables one to actually type-check against the imported crate during the compilation (IIRC if Cargo can't locate the imported crate to look into it, it will refuse to build the project), as opposed to hoping that the headers you've included are correctly describing the object file you'll be linking against.
Already discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42200209
Tldr: substack takes 10% and you can use Ghost either self host or a more sane on premise pricing (for now)
Related repository of interest: https://github.com/scandum/binary_search

"The most notable variant, the monobound binary search, executes two to four times faster than the standard binary search on arrays smaller than 1 million 32 bit integers."
I think you can try do a better demo video than this
"Initial speed usually isn't that important, but speed of learning is important and makes the difference between possible and impossible within a human lifetime."

Likely so, but is suggest that personality, drive and motivation are also very important factors. I know from experience that stuff I had little interest in as a youngster and that I've still little in I still know little about.

Yes, my interests have grown and broadened over the years but simply I regard some stuff so irrelevant to my life that it's not worth a second thought and I am much better off applying my limited number of neurons to matters of greater importance and enjoyment.

Of course, no one has the luxury of just learning about what one finds interesting and or enjoyable, life's knocks and experiences along with utilitarian-like imperatives force one to learn stuff they'd rather not know about.
Particularly in the haunches.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shorthorn

One of the cows pictured.
Laravel is excellent for building a website, for smaller projects there are simpler tools and frameworks
That's because I'm not a salesman ;)

If you like bitter aperitifs, campari, jager, etc then you owe it to yourself to try malort. If you don't, then you can live without it.
They are one and the same. There's no separation for Palestinians, they are a single nation. And Israel has shown that the only way to stop settlements is through armed combat, which is why they have stopped settling in Gaza and done the opposite by institutionalizing colonization and settlement in the west bank the moment the west bank laid down the arms and stopped the armed resistance.

They have also blockaded Gaza since before Hamas so again, that's an act of aggression by definition. You can't just blockade (to the point of attacking any ship trying to make it to gaza) another territory and claim that it is aggression when they attack you.
It misses a shorter introduction to explain key feature
p281 for Dirac equation. But I suggest you start at least from the beginning of Chapter 8. Earlier, obviously if you don't know Geometric Algebra. It's worth it; many examples but one is that the four Maxwell equations are expressed as one compact equation with geometric intuition.
It's quite common in cryptography for the runtime to be important. For example, password verification time shouldn't depend on the value of the key or the password. Systems have been broken because someone wrote a string compare that returned early.
This sort of comment always comes up.
Cars break rules too and there is a more of them. What’s the point being made?
Crimes by Canadian Politicians
I love where you're going with this, nearly all of my little side projects have something to do with maps and bikes. No comment on how the routes are as I'm not really familiar with any good routes in bigger Euro cities, but as someone who rides around NYC a lot this would be really useful in making routes for visitors who aren't as keen on riding in NYC traffic.

Mobile needs some work. Are you planning on open sourcing this? I'm a mobile dev that might be able to clean that up a little. Good candidate for React Native.
Sure, there is a hierarchy. But the hierarchy is open. You still need to recurse down the entire call stack to figure out which exceptions might be raised.
There's also this one from last year:

https://old.reddit.com/r/nuclearweapons/comments/12x9rxi/the...

Based on The Ol' Spicy Keychain:

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/the-ol-spicy-keychain
US Government commission pushes Manhattan Project-style AI initiative
> My longest dream was nine years compressed into a 12-hour sleep period.

Does the brain change in response to that sleep period? Or is there no change because there's no new information input?
Feds release highly anticipated options for managing overstressed Colorado River
That marginalized, powerless people get screwed is somehow not surprising. Not good, mind you, just not surprising.
After watching Surveilled on HBO last night (which was an expectedly overly sensationalist documentary with Ronan Farrow as the self centered host), they showed a security researcher wrapping a laptop with aluminum foil to stop signal from reaching it. Asking google about it was not helpful.
Those beluga whale pigs I’ve seen somewhere before and they haunt my dreams.
Bypassing app lock in Ente Auth
Because you might plan a route while already out on your bike
oooo

variable-length lookbehind assertions are now supported.

yay! I needed that so many times.
BEAM's bright future with Gleam (and JavaScript?) – Peter Saxton [video]
> Blaming people for their inability to fight their nature is just inhumane

It'd be nice if people didn't have to fight their nature. Our society demands we act in ways that are unhealthy and unnatural. We're forced to sit in chairs 8+ hours a day from very young ages. Children have teachers making sure they stay in their seats, and workers have supervisors enforcing inactivity either in person or using webcams and software. Companies like Amazon insist that their employees piss in bottles or wear diapers because leaving their workstation, even to use a bathroom, will get them fired. The demands of our daily lives and the design of our environments keep us from living the way we've evolved to live and it's normal and should be expected that many people will struggle with that reality more than others.

Either our society and environment needs to change, or our biology and chemistry need to change. Turns out, it's easier to change ourselves than it is to change the massive systems designed by greed and exploitation that we're forced to live in. We'll adapt. Today it's with drugs. Tomorrow it may be genetic manipulation.
> There is no boogie man trying to scare people away from broccoli

I disagree, everyone I know who has been on a keto dietic consumes little to no fruits or fiber. Honestly, I'm not sure how they use the bathroom successfully with such little fiber ingestion.
There is no “realism,” photography is its own form of art. What’s remarkable is how common this perspective is even today, such that it has been produced as “realistic” for you and how you see the world.
There's so many researchers working in AI now that we can afford to explore all avenues. This probably isn't going to lead to a fully generative AI game engine, but I bet there'll be useful learnings along the way.
Redpoint VC
The Productivity Paradox: Why Doing More Leads to Less
It is all about the superstars
Also note that the US imposed heavy sanctions on Ethopia and Eritrea’s entire government party, head of state, spouses and businesses under the exact same observations of provoking famine and starvation

EO 14046
We make an AI camera for residential home builders. I'd love to chat to see if there's any synergy here.

bedrockwireless.com

Ping me, stephen [at] bedrockwireless.com
I likewise “can’t believe” we have CPUs. The two things are equally wild to me.

Sometimes i imagine how I would explain our current tech to someone clever and curious from the past. Like what would Jules Verne, Edison or John von Neumann do if you took your iphone out of your pocket and show them as you unlock it with your face, click youtube and search their name. (Just as an example of something super pedestrian and mundane which might just blow their minds.) We are trully living in an age of wonders.
Hybrid Supercapacitor LED Earrings (2022)
worse than javascript?
Isn’t any philosophy about cows a herd mentality?
> Probably any change in country takes some time to adjust to traffic. Coming from the Netherlands, I got quite confused when driving in San Francisco,

To be fair, driving in SF is a challenge even for many people coming from other parts of California, due to the high density plus the steep and narrow topography of the city. Whereas someone coming from Pittsburgh might not find it strange due to the similar topography.

Until regenerative braking came around with hybrid and electric cars, SF cars needed very frequent brake pad changes.
Yeah these ‘predictors’ only make sense if they can give a countdown at a constant rate.
The idea is nice but often they countdown at say 1dot/sonly to have the last 5 dots disappear in the last second so they miss their purpose.
on the other hand, a consequence on predictable ones is that people will start cycling on the last 2 dots or so instead of waiting for the green light.
My invention: Printing press – writing without scribes
> So you don't have to go and claim a deception.

I didn't claim a deception in the research paper. I've clearly stated what I'm claiming, and you've said nothing that changes any of that.

In fact, you originally didn't even mention the research paper, you said "the announcement". The deception was in every official announcement, none of which included any details of the caveat that you quoted. That deception continued, mostly unwittingly I'm sure, in all the press on the matter.

You're shifting the goalposts to try to support a point which is irrelevant to what I've been saying.

> You want to claim it wasn't significant which is your opinion but that is not what the actual scientific community in the field (who know more than you) would agree.

It's not significant with respect to commercial nuclear fusion power, which was the entire basis for all the reporting about it.

The idea that "the actual scientific community" would support your position is an unsupported claim that's easily refuted.

For example, Victor Gilinsky, a physicist who previously a commissioner for the US NRC, wrote in "What’s fueling the commercial fusion hype?"[1]:

> "Recent White House and Energy Department pronouncements on speeding up the 'commercialization' of fusion energy are so over the top as to make you wonder about the scientific competence in the upper reaches of the government."

That article discusses the NIF experiment among others, highlighting out the discrepancies between the official announcements and what the experiment actual does. It also points out that the experiment "is, in effect, a miniature (secondary) thermonuclear bomb, with the lasers playing the role of the triggering fission reactions (primary)," which helps explain "its lack of promise for civilian use."

There have been plenty of similar criticism from other scientists, including Daniel Jassby previously of Princeton Plasma Physics Lab, and M.V. Ramana at U. British Columbia.

In "Clean Energy or Weapons? What the ‘Breakthrough’ in Nuclear Fusion Really Means"[2], Ramana wrote, "without the excitement created by these hyped-up statements, it would be impossible to get funded for the decades it takes to plan and build these facilities."

Again, in a "sane, rational, advanced" society, this would not be necessary. And you, and the commenter I originally replied to, would not have had clear misapprehensions about the experiment as a result. In your case, at the very least, you appeared to believe that "ignition" was some fundamental physical phenomenon in this case, which it is not, in the context of the NIF experiment.

> As a fellow scientist

As a scientist, you should be interested in what's true.

--

[1] https://thebulletin.org/2024/02/whats-fueling-the-commercial...

[2] https://science.thewire.in/the-sciences/clean-energy-weapons...
The police is ever expanding, nobody can be a criminal in peace anymore .
I know this sounds like a zen koan but to be consistent, don't worry about consistency. A description of the desired outcome is not a strategy for achieving it.

An actual strategy: track all of the blockers. You say that your sprints "go wrong" but that isn't a helpful observation. If you track why it goes wrong - write down the start and end time any time you get stuck, blocked, confused, waiting on others, dealing with unforeseen issues, "tech debt", etc.

This is not a failure, it's a vital signal! The time spent on blockers are literally what's standing between you and consistency. Address them head on with empirical data. You should be able to estimate the risk for any new change based on how much time you wasted in the past working on that subsystem.
It's a clear choice. Slog through the problems again and deliver inconsistent results - or fix it and deliver consistently.

You do have to be selective - don't just fiddle with the code until it's pretty - fix only the observed problems that stand in the way of delivery. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change" - Kent Beck.
I honestly don't know what point you are trying to make here?
It also doesn't help that the bid/contract process is skewed to select the lowest bidder.

You can always forget to add some margin here or there, or fail to plan for problems that might pop up. It's easy to game the system because sunk costs make it nearly impossible to switch once you've started.
I hadn't caught the part of the article (thanks alcohol ads) that did describe literally building a 1KM long "bat shed" with no evidence whatsoever that was necessary, (although I'd argue these bureaucracys often tend to get lost in spending the same amount on studies deciding whether something is worth it) The proposition seemed so unrelated and absurd that I thought it had to be hypothetical, and for this I'm deeply sorry lol this is so emblematic of Britain
You need to read the statement from the context of "in principle" vs "in practice". When, in principle, no human has the capacity to understand or control a thing. A forest fire is a great thought experiment - we can, in principle, control and understand any forest fire. Given enough time and resources, no forest fire will ever exceed our theoretical capacity to control it. In principle, the technological rate of progress will exceed humanity's capacity to understand or control it. It will become a thing which happens to us, as opposed to us doing things.

Intelligence is one of those "we know it when we see it" problems. It literally encompasses the entirety of human cognition. Moravec described AI capabilities in terms of human equivalence, avoiding the need for any specific and well defined unit of measurement. If and when AI capabilities exceed human capabilities in any and every possible capacity, AI will be more intelligent than humans, and we can be certain that AGI is achieved. When we run out of "but machines can't do X as well as a human!" statements, we'll have achieved software that, when reproduced, optimized, and tasked en masse, will represent superintelligence.

There are multiple paths to get there. There are dozens, perhaps hundreds, of books covering the topic in depth.

There's no "exponentially more time than the last" issue with AI development. The halting problem can't be solved - that's the point of the halting problem.

We have sufficient understanding of computation and intelligence to say that there is nothing about the laws of physics, or the way biological brains work that even remotely suggests that anything brains do is impossible, or even particularly difficult, for silicon chips to achieve. The bottleneck in reproducing brains in silicon right now is data. Because of ethical and technical challenges, we can't gain access to the low level details of living brain tissue, but the science of connectome mapping, neurochemistry, and real-time electrical activity tracking continues to improve, and we will absolutely have mapped the entirety of the human brain down to the molecular level at some point in the next century. Given that information, we'll be able to recreate important structures in software, and produce functional equivalents to things like cortical neural columns and minicolumns, and we'll gain access to Hebbian dynamics that govern the wiring and growth of synapses, allowing us to recreate the rules that comprise human intelligence. That's the upper bound on when we're going to achieve artificial general intelligence - it may take a decade or two after we've got the map, but it's likely to happen a long time before we get the complete map, because much of what the brain is doing is based on highly repeated structures distributed throughout the neocortex - figure out how they work, how their behavior is coordinated, and how that produces learning and behavior, and you crack the problem of intelligence.
With standard opcaching and jit enabled, the reparsing step doesn’t happen.

Initializes for each request is standard with php-fpm, but swoole/workerman/etc are rapidly gaining popularity and run as a more typical app server with coroutines.
We’re still on 7.4 at my mid co. =|
Writing good documentation is extremely hard. Even 10x engeneers can be basically illiterate.
Many argue the basis for true comedy is dealing with fear, rejection, and embarrassment...

With Thermonuclear War: no one is around to experience anything after a comedian bombs on the world stage.

Stanley Kubrick was famous for making actors miserable, but reminded us film is ultimately a collaborative art form. =3
Thanks for the feedback, yeah didn't find enough time, will plan to do other videos
What's amusing is that at that very time, Google was building its Email Discovery platform (https://support.google.com/a/answer/2462365?hl=en)- basically a way for lawyers to search, inspect, and triage emails in an org to make them available. Yes, lawyers (billing hourly) trawl through hundreds to thousands of email then hand them over to the opposition. I talked to the eng building the product and they said they personally had to do some manual email classification to train the retrieval models and that they lost any interest in using email after seeing what people put it their corporate email.
See also https://painterqubits.github.io/Unitful.jl/stable/
It would seem wise to potentially add a low dosed anabolic androgenic steroid like Anavar (Oxandrolone) [1] during a course of Ozempic. This would help keep skeletal muscle in tact during a calorie deficient period. A low dose wouldn't be expected to cause much, if any, side effects. But it's something that would be best put through rigorous studies.

But bodybuilders have been using tricks like these for decades (obviously at much more ridiculously high amounts) that work quite successfully for this exact purpose.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxandrolone
It's utterly appalling, and the main reason I tend to think the end of apartheid in Israel will look substantially different than the end of apartheid in South Africa.
Have more slack/free time. That’s basically it. Anything else is a patch that will fail once you go over capacity.

People habitually run at 90-110% capacity and then wonder why they do bad work.
> The only way to lose weight without damaging oneself is to combine more exercise with less eating, which means becoming comfortable being hungry

No, not really. Yes, this is how you lose weight, but this is not how you have to be to be a healthy weight.

I'm thin, I don't exercise, and I'm not hungry. I feel great.

I can sit around and jerk myself off about discipline, but the truth is I have none. I have done absolutely nothing to be in this position, it's all luck and factors far beyond my comprehension.

if a drug is able to induce that same feeling in others, I say go for it. It sucks that a normal caloric intake translates to pain, hunger, and constant brain noise for a large segment of the population.
early next week
If Europe (ie Germany) as a whole fails to enforce the warrant, the court is pretty much dissolved.
> However I was unable to visual how 2/3 is more than 1/2 when 1/2 is half a pint, or half a glass.

Maybe visualize splitting a pint with a friend. If you split the pint into 2 equal parts and each of you gets 1 of those 2 parts you each get the same amount.

Then visualize splitting it instead into 3 equal parts. You get 1 of those parts and your buddy gets 2. There's no fractions there so it should be easier to visualize that your buddy got twice as much as you did.

Comparing those two visualizations might make it easier to see that someone who gets 2/3 of a pint gets more than someone who gets 1/2 of a pint.
Many occurrences of Hyrum's are "desire paths[1]" of APIs. For many people, the most obvious way to determine if the error was a MaxBytesError was to check the string. I'm not familiar with Go, but assuming it has RTTI, I'm guessing the intended path for people to take was to check the type of the error against MaxBytesError, and occurrences of this were people who either didn't know that, or found the error string to be immediately available in their tooling, but the type not immediately available.

[edit]

Per [2], this looks desire paths is even more an apt analogy than I thought; until 3 years ago, this code returned a generic Error type.

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desire_path

2: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42202472
Sure, you can add up to 200 waypoints - if you want to do that via the old-school click-click-click there’s a toggle, or you can just drag the route. I ride for fun too which is why I built a routeplanner that likes quiet and scenic roads!
Breathe, don't vent: Turning down the heat is key to managing anger