skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> gets a lot of it's business via AWS Bedrock

can you quantify? any numbers, even guesstimates?
Clinical validation of a wearable ultrasound sensor of blood pressure
It's a relatively small gym so I assume they don't have the resources to improve the system and quite frankly I too would prefer if they spent the money on more equipment
I am in Operations. I use it (and pay for it) because the free version seemed to work best for me compared to Perplexity (which had been my go-to) and ChatGPT/OpenAI.
This is exactly how I meant it. From the perspective of my 6yo, who can't really read yet or know what Netlify is, it was also never perceived as an Ad, but a game.
Learn when to pushback and when to give in. Pushing back makes you looks smarter giving in more of a team player. Figuring out a proper balance for your environment is key.

Learn to constantly explore and be curious. Think like a hacker and the skills you need will become apparent when you try to do something and hit a wall.

Read this once a day for 7 days. You already are a better programmer.

https://www.mit.edu/~xela/tao.html
> quadruple G=(N,Σ,P,S), where T is a finite set of nonterminal symbols, Σ a finite set of terminal symbols, P is a set of production rules and S is a start symbol.

I think "T" is supposed to be "N" in that sentence[1], based solely upon the further use of "N" nomenclature in subsequent paragraphs

1: he said, 5 years too late into a forum just discussing the article
This is technically true, but the kind of comment that muddies the waters. It's true that GM performance is better in realistic games.

It is false that GMs would have any trouble determining legal moves in randomly generated positions. Indeed, even a 1200 level player on chess.com will find that pretty trivial.
Government alone could be huge, with this recent nonsense about the military funding a “Manhattan project for AI” and the recently announced Pentagon contracts.
> The more you think about an estimate, the higher it will go

This is excellent advice. At Apsis, we have a collection of "red flags" for any project that we call out specifically as likely sources of increased complexity and therefore a higher estimate. Some of these are:

* integrations external APIs

* existing tech from the client with no provided documentation

* any new infrastructure being spun up
That doesn't really explain how they know to find this place, decades after the last time any member of their species visited it. It explains why evolution selected for this behavior, but the more interesting part is how it happens in an individual salmon.
We’re very grateful for the opportunity to create this experience! Huge thanks to you and the Netlify team for supporting innovative campaigns like this one.
Show HN: My First Micro SaaS – Auto-Generated Embeddable Changelogs
Just launched my first Micro SaaS.

Solving my own problem - creating embeddable Changelogs that are SEO-friendly on autopilot.

Check it out and let me know what you think.

How it works:

GitHub sync: Automatically syncs closed issues and adds them to the changelog.

AI Analysis & Generation: AI processes and summarizes your closed issues, making them human-readable and orienting them towards your value prop.

SEO-Friendly: SEO-friendly changelog widget, structured and indexed by search engines, driving organic traffic directly to your site.

Embeddable: Showcase your changelog on your website.
My comment was purely about Claud.ai which is where general customers would go.
Fish ladders have been around for centuries. They have mixed results.

I went to Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River between Washington and Oregon and it was kind of like being in an aquarium watching the fish swim upstream. They seemed to get tired and would float backwards with the water current and then start swimming again against the current.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish_ladder

They also had a salmon hatchery literally right after the dam. But they had some stats showing that it also had mixed effectiveness.
Of course. But it’s worth recognizing that you like a translation of D, not his original works.
9 is still 9 too much, don't you agree?
Nice. It would be cool if this project could cleanly separate sources based on location.

That would be a bit like a lightfield camera, where you can edit the focusing parameters after the image has already been taken, but now with sound.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_field_camera
He Was Obamas nominee for SCOTUS, Bidens selection for AG, and has been held in contempt by the republican House.
Local archiving tool I've been testing: webchiver.com
Hasbro's Gamer CEO to Focus on Play After Paring Film Assets
I guess it must be intentional, but to my ear, the tuning sounds way off between the guitar and bass. Maybe this is part of the tradition or something, but I find it to be so far off, it's hard to listen to.
I didn't vote you down, but having specific examples of problems with legislation you had is a much stronger argument, and is completely normal. The big boys are already creating a lot of negative competition and you are right that regulatory capture is really bad, more money = more influence in legislation.

However, the world of data caps and shitty service abounds very much because of the lack of SOME of these rules, and so the middle ground in my mind isn't destroy it all, it's fixing legislation.

Laws often have unintended consequences and trample on minority viewpoints, but while in the "destroy it all" framework we do get to reject some onerous rules, the vast majority of us get bent over a barrel, get more expensive service, and have no choice.
Well yeah you can still use yuzu (if you can find it) but over time software rot will take its toll with no development. Perhaps Torzu or similar will be able to at least keep it maintained to run on current systems even if they make no real progress.
what does this say about their internal teams working on the same thing?
this gives me an idea... what if you keep everything about the game the same but change it to hjkl navigation for vim learners?
Hackernews needs a better way to highlight stimulating comments. This one generated a healthy discussion, still 0 points.

I advocated for a controversial ranking before and it’s still relevant.
> They are openly caught in lies continuously

Example? Source?

> and people like you deciding not to hold them accountable

I'm sorry, what? :D
Seems like a pretty easy problem to solve if you ask me:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/stemming-the-plas...

Someone should send this link to Trump and Elon Musk so America and the EU can slap some actual serious and economy-breaking tariffs on those countries. I know that sounds snarky and drastic and funny and off-topic, but we seriously need actual serious politicians that just get shit done. We've tried the "reasonable politicians" approach so far, maybe it's time to bring in people that are unpalatable but actually willing to break shit and blockade some actual evil people and countries around the world in order to make positive change.
I once did a project to do multilateration of bats (the flying mammal) using an array of 4 microphones arranged in a big Y shape on the ground. Using the time difference of arrival at the four microphones, we could find the positions of each bat that flew over the array, as well as identify the species. It was used for an environmental study to determine the impact of installing wind turbines. Fun times.
You rely way less on dependencies when writing Go code though. That’s in big parts why it doesn’t break nearly as much (or at all).
So you define your filter function by saying it can use anything that has the next and the len functions. Cool.

If a type A defined in module_a doesn’t have the functions defined in its module, should it still be filterable?

If the required function is defined in a module_b should A be filterable?
As someone who doesn't really follow the LLM space closely, I have been consistently turning to Anthropic when I want to use an LLM (usually to work through coding problems)

Beside Sonnet impressing me, I like Anthropic because there's less of an "icky" factor compared to OpenAI or even Google. I don't know how much better Anthropic actually is, but I don't think I'm the only one who chooses based on my perception of the company's values and social responsibility.
I've never thought about using a hyperscaler as a kind of insurance policy before. Really intereresting point.
It doesn't sound like you really do disagree with the author at all. I never had the sense that he was trying to shame anyone. In fact he almost exactly echoes your 2nd paragraph:

> I’m not here to be the humor police, or to say things should be “off limits” for comedy, or that it’s “too soon,” or make any other scolding noises. Dark humor, in its own strange and inverted way, is arguably a sort of coping mechanism — a defense against the darkness, a way to tame and de-fang the horrors of the world.
> Read my words again: the threat was made.

You are making things up at this point. Eastern Europe has no Tomahawks, and nor has anyone given any indication that this would change, nor does the extreme caution in supplying much weaker weapons give a reason to even speculate about Tomahawks.

However, supplying more advanced weapons to Ukraine would be justified, given that Russia has broken the promises given to Ukraine in exchange for dismantling their nuclear weapons. I hope to see it happen!

> How many years of war occurred between the coup-government of Ukraine and the territory of Donbass before Russia invaded?

Zero. The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that there were no "separatists" in Donbas except for unmarked members of Russian armed forces and security services, fully under Russian command. And as in Yugoslavia, many lives could've been saved if NATO was more assertive in bombing the aggressor and establishing peace instead of looking the other way.

> Ah, and the USA has deployed their missiles all over Europe

American missiles stand where they stood when Nixon was still in office and countries that have joined alliances since the Cold War host none of them.
> Anthropic used to be in the Google camp

I don't think Anthropic took any allegiances here. Amazon already invested $4B last year (Google invested $2B).
as an optic scientists i would protest my work being lumped zogether with the psychedelics of AIchemists
> The Guardrails on Claude Sonnet 3.5 API are not stricter than Openai’s guardrails in my experience.

Both Gemini and Claude (via the API) have substantially tighter guardrails around recitation (producing output matching data from their training set) than OpenAI, which I ran into when testing an image text-extraction-and-document-formatting toolchain against all three.

Both Claude and Gemini gave refusals on text extraction from image documents (not available publicly anywhere I can find as text) from a CIA FOIA release

Not sure if they are tighter in other areas.
I don't know if Claude.ai or ChatGPT are even profitable at this stage, so they might not particularly want general customers.
The AGI Race
Thank you. So many people confuse their own values with science. Science might say "If you take action X, thing A increases" and a person who values thing A hears "Science says we should take action X". That is not correct. Science informs you about the impacts of your actions (imperfectly), and it is a social/cultural/political (and most definitely not a scientific) discussion which of those impacts we actually prefer.
This is 10000% false. Straight up misinformation.
Do these apply to NuShell? I think something like that is the way forward. Something with real data types rather than implicitly doing weird array processing. I would be pretty happy with something similar to Python but with easier IO redirection and subprocess management.

xonsh is neat in principle, but painful in actual usage ime. And I suspect vulnerable to similar issues around the Python-bash interop.
I'm Pole so I am biased, but... What was Soviet Union but another colonial project?
And not to even say of countries they annexed. If Baltic states were not in Europe, everyone would agree that it was plain colonial arrangement.

"We give them coal, and in return they take sugar from us."
The author here. This is just the shortest (in terms of size) reasoning about the topic. Any feedback and discussion is welcome!
Right, but what I'm describing is a tradeoff point that's between the extremes, where implementations are unnamed but can still be explicitly imported.

Making my example more explicit, you'd need syntax along the lines of

// inside crate C
use A::impl std::hash::Hash for i32;

This syntax would explicitly be limited to orphan implementations.

I suppose to further clarify, there's still some coherence requirement there in that crate C can't import the conflicting implementations from both A and B. Which could then perhaps be worked around by adding syntax to spell types along the lines of

HashMap<i32 + A::impl Hash, V>

Which you could argue is a form of naming implementations, I suppose? I'm not familiar with ML. You could maybe also think of it as a more ergonomic way of doing (more or less) those wrapper types.

In any case, the annotation burden only exists where it's actually needed to enable orphan implementations.

And either way, multiple different impls can safely coexist within the overall set of code that's linked together, with everything being statically checked at compile time.
Intel NPU Library v1.4 Adds Turbo Mode and Tensor Operations
1. I don't think I understand why you think flex & grid are barely unusable... without a dozen classes..? Maybe an example would clarify this perception for me.

2. You barely need media queries anymore for responsive design. Auto-adapting flex or grid containers and the use of clamp() reduced 90% of my media query usage. I usually use like 1 to 4 media queries in project (for master layout and responsive nav, for example). And there's a nice side effect to this type of intrinsic design : layout and type is way easier to optimize for every viewport! Mobile first design is really easy to approach in this way.

3. You can apply a dark mode by only switching a theme file with design tokens inside. Way lighter, way easier to read, does not clutter your codebase.

4. As a corollary to the previous point, the defaults you are talking about can be CSS custom properties defined in a theme file as I think, Tailwind 4 will do. You could then use the exact same defaults in native CSS.

5. Simple rules about CSS usage, enforced by Stylelint for example, can prevent the vast majority (and maybe all!) of the cascading problems you mention. Here are some rules and a Stylelint config I posted in a reply below: https://ecss.info. I've got a good track record with teamwork and this config.

CSS solutions may be really easy to use when approached properly. I'm happy to follow up with examples and/or reply to subsequent questions and thoughts!
Yeah, sorry, I know that particular fascist’s history, but apparently sarcasm doesn’t drip as heavily on the Internet as I thought.
AFAIK they used Gcloud to run their models.
ok but how much cash, really.. looks ambiguous.

ps- plenty of people turning a blind eye towards rampant valuation inflation and "big words" statements on deals. Where is the grounding on the same dollars that are used at a grocery store? The whole thing is fodder for instability in a big way IMHO
Maybe that's a thing, but here's a video of a pet beaver making a "dam" out of stuffies and other household objects.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ImdlZtOU80
>1 illegal move in 1 million or 100 million or any other sample size you want to choose means it doesn’t understand chess

Highly rated chess players make illegal moves. It's rare but it happens. They don't understand chess ?
This beats TFA. Interesting relation between cumulativeness and distribution ("Yule process"). But how does this explain variation is how quickly children pick up maths - would you argue it's due to prior exposure e.g. parental tutoring?

Any comments on the "10x programmer"?
> Good point about Judicial Warrants, we will implement an autodelete so that if the user didn't delete their data within X days, it gets deleted automatically. Hence, when Warrant comes, we are sorry we don't have the data anymore.

Nice.

Have you considered HIPAA compliance, as well?

> I am too busy and unfortunately health conditions of my son required multiple appointments every week since he was born.

That's rough, man. I had to be my wife's main caregiver when she had breast cancer, and making sure she got the care she needed wasn't easy.
intra-distribution generalization is also not well posed in practical real world settings. suppose you learn a mapping f : x -> y. casually, intra-distribution generalization implies that f generalizes for "points from the same data distribution p(x)". Two issues here:

1. In practical scenarios, how do you know if x' is really drawn from p(x)? Even if you could compute log p(x') under the true data distribution, you can only verify that the support for x' is non-zero. one sample is not enough to tell you if x' drawn from p(x).

2. In high dimensional settings, x' that is not exactly equal to an example within the training set can have arbitrarily high generalization error. here's a criminally under-cited paper discussing this: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.02774
It's wild to see people in this thread defending that the family "only" had to pay either $7K (or $18K with the ambulance).

Stockholm syndrome at its finest.
Evolution doesn't mind how it feels, it only matters if it's effective at adaptation. It could be that running water in their homes stresses them as much as it stresses us, albeit for different reasons.

The running water speaker experiment was done in dry land, and beavers are very wary of going out of the water because of their predators, yet they risked working over the speakers.
Scalar: Modern open-source API client (Postman alternative) built for OpenAPI
China tested its first inflatable space module in orbit – SpaceNews
The Nearest Neighbor Attack
This is really cool. Like a mix between TradeWars 2002 and sportsball management.

Well played sir.
Anthropic is getting $4B in investment in a year where their revenue was about $850M. Even if Amazon had bought them outright for that much, they would not be ahead. The fact that everybody keeps repeating the claim that Amazon is "making money" makes this appear like some kind of scam.
Yea, even if they're practically as bad, there's value in not having someone like Altman who's out there saying things about how many jobs he's excited to make obsolete and how much of the creative work of the world is worthless.
Stick to the site's guidelines, Sajaar.
That's hilarious! I'm imaging droves of French people day-tripping to Folkestone for fish-and-chips, sausage rolls, expensive cigarettes and expensive crap beer. LOL (Apologies if a genuine question - just as a Brit, the thought is actually hilarious)

I think it's fair to say the French had way, way more to offer Brits than vice versa.

Of course they visited/visit the UK, but to see the country more than to buy any particular goods in bulk

The GBP was stronger compared to the Franc/EUR back in the heyday of Eurotunnel too, IIRC
No, but with big market share comes big responsibility.

Video streaming is extremely unprofitable sure, but in its care it tries to leverage its market share with Chrome browser to benefit. And you are not allowed to do that when your market share is big.
Sure, FedEx shouldn't have delivered to the wrong address.

I'm just saying it's totally normal for the names and signatures to go unchecked when the goods are handed over.

The driver can't validate someone is a real employee before handing over the delivery. There's no mechanism for that.
Premium-priced AI PCs? Businesses aren't buying – yet
How about "Just let people go home early and have lives"?
It's been several years since my colleague put this post together, but I think for us it's proven to be a very constructive framework for talking to clients.

It's probably worth calling out that we are, specifically, outside contractors providing estimates for clients --- usually clients at the start of their software development journey. I think a lot of our framework holds for developers working on in-house engineering teams, but there are bound to be some differences.

That said, I'll be curious to read your post whenever it goes up. Namely because I don't know what the conclusion of your comment is. Whether it's as a vendor or as an engineer on staff, estimates are a hard requirement of software development. Most stakeholders are not developers, and you can only educate the recipients of your estimates so much on the nuances of what is and isn't hard to accommodate. I don't really disagree with any of your assertions --- but isn't the re-evaluation process simply... more estimation? Aren't accounting for project risks --- like which developer is going to pick up the task, what requirements are likely or unlikely to change --- part of producing a quality estimate?

Communicating expectations is hard, and to me, one of the defining lines between junior and senior developers is the ability to clearly account for expected risks, and identify plausible but unlikely risks, and to incorporate mitigation into the plan of attack.
I'd say that's because we don't understand what we mean by "understand".

Hardware that accurately performs maths faster than all of humanity combined is so cheap as to be disposable, but I've yet to see anyone claim that a Pi Zero has "understanding" of anything.

An LLM can display the viva voce approach that Turing suggested[0], and do it well. Ironically for all those now talking about "stochastic parrots", the passage reads:

"""… The game (with the player B omitted) is frequently used in practice under the name of viva voce to discover whether some one really understands something or has ‘learnt it parrot fashion’. …"

Showing that not much has changed on the philosophy of this topic since it was invented.

[0] https://academic.oup.com/mind/article/LIX/236/433/986238
All the human brain does is determine how to fire some motor neurons. No, it does not reason.

No, the human brain does not "understand" language. It just knows how to control the firing of neurons that control the vocal chords, in order to maximize an endocrine reward function that has evolved to maximize biological fitness.

I can speak about human brains the same way you speak about LLMs. I'm sure you can spot the problem in my conclusions: just because the human brain is "only" firing neurons, it does actually develop an understanding of the world. The same goes for LLMs and next-word prediction.
Thanks, I’ve sort of assumed that all these things they’ve been announcing during the lame duck period were things Biden wanted to rush through that Trump has a high probability of nixing as tends to happen during the lame duck period when party control switches. I appreciate your insight on this specific issue.
Lot's of great people are terrible in some aspect or another. Seeking saints is counterproductive since this is not about celebrating these people's character but their great work.

The whole cancel culture is deeply misguided. It's analogous to expecting wisdom on everything from people who are extremely good at this one thing, but in reverse. It never ends well.
That the descriptive is not the prescriptive should not be a surprise.

That random people will largely have suboptimal skills should not be a surprise.

Yes, many people can't think properly. Proper thinking remains there as a potential.
I just asked GPT4o to recognize a cartoon character (I accessed it via Perplexity) and it told me it isn't able to do that, while Claude Sonnet happily identified the character, so this might vary by use case or even by prompt.
Threads is overhauling search and trending with AI-generated summaries