skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
as others have mentioned, this would be great if it would spit html fragments instead of react components. It would be really useful for quickly building htmx apps.
I’d love a federated Strava replacement. Unfortunately I don’t believe that the AT Protocol supports private or limited visibility posts yet, which I think is a pretty key feature for Strava’s use case.
https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/blob/v1.6.0/website/conte... seems to have existed since before the license rug-pull. However I'm open to there being some miscommunication because https://developer.hashicorp.com/nomad/docs/glossary doesn't mention the word "control" and the word "host" could mean any number of things in this context
No respect unless they find a way to make a small hole down the middle. Bucatini, our love affair was short but intense. Please come back.
The goal here was to circumvent 2FA on devices located inside the Org A office.

On-prem systems prompt for 2FA. So the attacker knew a user/password combo, but couldn't leverage it directly because they would have triggered 2FA.

But the 802.1x didn't have 2FA enabled. So using the user/password combo they already had, they just needed to approach the target network over WiFi in order to bypass the 2FA requirement.
> If you can afford to do things like this you can most likely use something other than C++ and save yourself a lot of headaches.

Surely you can understand that, despite the recent c++ hate, my job doesn't give a fuck and we aren't migrating our massive codebase from c++ to... anything.
> ts/js is were ts is just js with types. You can comment out the types and it just runs.

Is this true in the general case? I thought there were typescript features that didn't have direct JavaScript alternatives, for example enums.
OpenAI considers developing a browser to compete with Chrome
You’re right about that, and I salute your principled stance, but the last thing I want to deal with is making a protest at the checkpoint before I can get to the lounge.

These people are standing between me and a free glass of mid wine and the most comfortable place I’m going to be for the next <y> hours. They also have basically unlimited power to make my day worse, delaying me, searching me, doing all kinds of real violations of my rights.

Frankly, the quicker robots take their jobs the better, I hope this speeds it up.
>I guess then it's "good" when the coming administration will point the military against its own people and put them in camps?

Ladies and gentlemen, this is what brainwashing due to propaganda exposure looks like in real life.
I'm being descriptive, bot prescriptive: I'm stating what the priorities are under a capitalist system without the rose-colored glasses offered by the Just-world fallacy.
(Carbon lang dev here.)

Carbon is intended to be memory safe! (Not sure whether you intended to write a double negative there.) There are a few reasons that might not be clear:

* Carbon has relatively few people working on it. We currently are prioritizing work on the compiler at the moment, and don't yet have the bandwidth to also work on the safety design.

* As part of our migration-from-C++ story, where we expect code to transition C++ -> unsafe Carbon -> safe Carbon, we plan on supporting unsafe Carbon code with reasonable ergonomics.

* Carbon's original focus was on evolvability, and didn't focus on safety specifically. Since then it has become clear that memory safety is a requirement for Carbon's success, and will be our first test of those evolvability goals. Talks like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZTJ9omXOQ0 better reflect more recent plans around this topic.
It does. A lognormal distribution would model that better which gives a nice right tail so maybe it is a useful toy model.
FYI to anyone on Nix/NixOS, sqlitestudio is available on unstable branch of nixpkgs:

https://search.nixos.org/packages?channel=unstable&show=sqli...
> They just need to have a good enough reputation to make sure environmentally-conscious people don't boycott their products.

And what do you think happens when people spread messages like mine?

Change the tides and they follow. It isn't futile because as you said, they need enough reputation. They don't want the negative effect on their bottom line. So maybe instead of "correcting" me, push it too. They seem to benefit more from your comment than we do, despite you seeming to agree with the sentiment.
The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that addressed Section 3 of the 14th Amendment and declared that they're only enforceable by Congress really opens a can of worms.

It sounds to me like the 22nd Amendment and the Article II natural-born citizenship requirement are also only enforceable by Congress. If you're making your plans based on a theory that Congress is able to do the right thing, or that the Supreme Court is not a hyper-partisan institution, I would have a strong C because plans A and B are pretty questionable.
I started this and the "comparable screen" is the sticking point. Nobody makes screens in this resolution, and most people have decided even 4k is overkill for this size for reason.

You're best going for 4k at 27 inches, I think, and that's $200 and you're under budget.
Does the rule require that the two options are "equal", which they are not in this case.
Correct. IQ isn't an effective measurement of intelligence as is typically stated. It is (at best) a measurement of learning disabilities.
"Our findings provide evidence that loneliness is associated with deviations from the zeitgeist, specifically when it comes to perceptions of well-known celebrities"

Soooooo... thinking differently than the majority of people may lead to loneliness, because those who think differently than the zeitgeist have a hard time connecting with the majority of people because of the way they think?
UCL is a widely known acronym, like MIT.

It’s not as famous as MIT but still known to anyone in academia and most in the anglosphere.
Hopefully you don’t get assigned to fixing bugs, because then you may not earn any money.
>It would be a monumental achievement if computer science ever advances to the point where we have a mathematical way of determining the minimum absolute intelligence required to solve a given problem

For a huge number of problems (including many on IQ tests) computer science does in fact have a mathematical way of determining the minimum absolute amount of compute necessary to solve the problem. That's what complexity theory is. Then it's just a matter of estimating someone's "compute" from how fast they solve a given class of problems relative to some reference computer.
Why Numbering Should Start at 0
Yes, insurance rates for satellites launching on reused boosters go down the more flight tested the booster is.
I've adopted a rule of thumb to have a very low bar to skip straight to writing a state machine. I've never once regretted it, personally. I'm sure they can be misused but I haven't came across that.
Show HN: I am Building a Producthunt alternative
Everyone has their own favorite chess youtuber that will review these games. I prefer GM Ben Finegold's analysis (and humor): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLJqm2XAB0s
It says portable, and

> No need to install or uninstall. Just download, decompress and run.

but the main download button is an installer for windows.
That’s similar to what vcpkg does under the covers. It clones the repo containing the dependency’s source code and then compiles it using the same compiler as the rest of your project. This avoids static libraries and ABI considerations while also avoiding having to copy/paste their entire source tree into your own.
with all due respect every single reason you listed here is 100% wrong… I have had Tesla S 2014 for now over a decade - the cost of “maintenance” exactly $0.00. here’s what my costs have been (I have free supercharging so we can say this has been total cost of ownership)

- new internal battery $220
- new modem when switch to “5G” was made - $250-ish
- new tires

that is it. after 80k miles I am still on original brakes cause with regerative braking I seldom-to-never use the brake (as my wife would say if I use a brake on Tesla it is always followed by F-bomb at another driver)

not sure who told you all these things but they are all 100% wrong - no exception
> problematic pattern where interviewers pose esoteric questions they've recently researched

The days of the “brain teaser” interview question are gone, at least from the “magnificent 7” and similar big tech companies. Nowadays it’s coding, behavioral, and design, at least for engineers.

I concur with the sentiment that performance ranking has a very significant social component. If you have a bad relationship with your manager, watch out. But also, if your manager has a bad relationship with THEIR manager, or are not adept at representing their employees, you can get screwed too.
> in order to be able to freely choose which group to join, no group must be allowed to reject me.

That's not how free association works. Both the individual and the group, each according to their own criteria, determine if they want to associate with one another.

The same point applies to many of your other arguments.

I don't really think it would increase the number of people who are left behind. There are many left behind people all over the world who on paper have states they belong to, but which the rules of those states leave them cut out of any real participation. If they could participate in whatever groups they currently belong to, with full sovereignty rather than under a state attempting to destroy these groups and subsume them, I think those people would be better off. And, for those few that are unwanted by anyone, much fewer than there are now in a state dominated environment, they can always choose to associate with one another.

There will be rules based on location no matter what you do. You don't need a state for that. People live in places, and they have customs and etiquette and rules of decorum. You probably won't be able to walk around naked in Kabul no matter whether there's a state or not.
I'm curious: Do Chinese cars have the stigma of being crap quality in other countries?

Here in Mexico most anecdotes of people buying Chinese cars are that after less than a year something broke and they had to take it to the repair shop, where it stayed for a very long time due to a lack of pieces even by the manufacturer.
In a well-functioning capitalistic system, the sell side of the labor market has equal power with the buy side. When the buy and sell sides of a market have a huge power imbalance, this leads to market failure, which is contrary to the goals of a capitalist system, as it results in inefficient allocation of capital.
You can use MCP with Sourcegraph's Cody as well

https://sourcegraph.com/blog/cody-supports-anthropic-model-c...
Great open source framework your team have provided for the world. This has helped the growth of ai in an immeasurable way. Great team and moreover great people!
Cody supports additional context through Anthropic's Model Context Protocol
They offer a lifetime pricing tier, which will obviously removed in a few years if the company still exists. I wonder why a SaaS would even bother.
This is great, giving it a try!

A few first impressions:

- The dark overlay when customising the screen makes it hard to see the visual adjustments- And

- Can the clock default to system (12 or 24 hours)?

- Can I add the pinned tabs I had on the default home screen somehow?
Aside for onload being open source, not really. AF_XDP is the generalized, hardware agnostic, version of kernel bypass.

In addition to bypass onload also provides a full IP/TCP user space stack and non-intrusive support for existing binaries using the standard BSD socket interface (incidentally onload also supports XDP now).

io_uring is really for asynchronous communication with the kernel.
This doesn't seem to be useful for hiding the fact that something suspicious is going on. If I understand it correctly, a static analysis of the program would reveal that they are decrypting code with an AES key derived from CPU instruction timings, and then executing that code inside a TSX transaction.

Hardly normal behavior for non-malicious code. The only thing hidden is the actual key that will be used when it runs correctly, and hence what exactly the decrypted code does.

(Also, didn't Intel obsolete TSX already in more recent CPU generations, because of its use for speculative execution side-channels?)
> and then pick out 100 questions that form a Gaussian distribution. This is how IQ tests are created.

You missed an extremely important final step. People's scores on those 100 questions still aren't going to form a Gaussion distribution. You have to rank-order everyone's scores, then you assign the final IQ scores based on each person's ranking, not their raw score.
Technically the full name is on the homepage if you look at the footer, which has the full address. Looking around the website, they seem to take the branding seriously as being UCL, which is less generic than the full name which looks more like a description than a name. I’ve seen other colleges do the same.

We can argue if that’s a good or bad decision, but it seems to be intentional.
Amoeba (Advanced Multiple Organized Elemental BAsin) [pdf]
Or, you can look at the positive contribution that AI is adding for developers. This is true even for curmudgeons like me that tried it early on and had bad experiences. Using AI to look up documentation, and asking the AI to summarize alternatives takes many fewer clicks than searching Google. I also find it generates good code if you ask the right questions. That is, as an experienced programmer, I'm able to generate much better, iterative prompts than a nontechnical person or a junior programmer. With tools and the AI evolving, making iterative changes across your app using an AI is clearly part of the future of programming. Heck, it even chooses good variable names, and that's been the bane of programmers since the dawn of programming.
> “modern technologies have made friendship, romance, and social connection look easier than ever, and therefore the absence of such relationships has become all the harder to bear.”

Has it? One could say that technology has increased the chance of incidence, but it has also increased fragmentation. So Tinder might create a "social connection", but one that is probably weaker than had you met through friends or met through a common activity or met while hiking the same trail or met through work.

Making the incidence of connection easier does not equate to having deeper connections as technology has created -- to extents -- more silos, more fragmentation.
Both Python and Typescript SDK can be used to build a client. https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk/tree/... and https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/tree/main.... The TypeScript client is widely used, while the Python side is more experimental.

In addition, I recommend looking at the specification documentation at https://spec.modelcontextprotocol.io. This should give you a good overview of how to implement a client. If you are looking to see an implemented open source client, Zed implements an MCP client: https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/tree/main/crates/conte...

If you have specific questions, please feel free to start a discussion on the respective https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol discussion, and we are happy to help you with integrating MCP.
Less than a 5th? So $340? You think that’s a good price point for someone who just wants a computer and no hassle with other hardware needs?
So…

1) treat poor performers as bad hires and ignore them in your dataset

2) treat 10x performers as needing to be promoted and also ignore them in your data

3) treat everyone else as relatively equal

…and use “Pareto distribution” and “no one has mentioned this before” to write a blog post?

Is the point of the article to get people who disagree with 10% corporate culling a pseudo intellectual economic buzzword argument to stroke their hatred of an inefficient hr practice? If so:

1) 10% culling in performance review is a mechanism to cull “bad hires”. I find it difficult to understand how the author can argue it’s a bad practice and then state that you cull bad hires from your dataset without thinking that they are the same thing or at least largely overlapping.

2) If the author is proposing to separate performance review, culling bad hires, and promotions, into 3 separate systems and assume no overlap, he should think through the structural issues more. While it’s possible to design a management structure where the organization is at a constant state of no bad hires, all 10xers promoted, that is putting a lot of responsibility on individual managers to run review, culling and promotion by themselves at a very high level. It’s brittle - a few bad managers not running the system can easily leave your organization bloated with bad hires and no fallback (fallback = performance review process).

3) The system of performance review is equally about risk management to the business as it is about rewarding your employees. IMO, the author’s framing simplifies the problem too much and pushes the complexity out for other people to deal with. It’s the kind of thinking that is damaging to organizations… I wonder if there is a process to cull this kind of thinking from your org… wait what time of year is it??
I'm curious - what other technologies/libraries/APIs, including in other languages, did you draw on for inspiration, or would you say are similar to Rill?
When saying pinned tabs, you mean shortcuts, right?

I have added these suggestions to the to-do list and should come out in the next update!
It will. Otherwise the example wouldn't make sense. There's one important detail I haven't clarified enough in that part of the readme.

For proper pipeline termination the context has to be cancelled. So it should have been be Like:

func main() {
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
defer cancel()

urls := rill.Generate(func(send func(string), sendErr func(error)) {
for i := 0; i < 1000 && ctx.Err() == nil; i++ {
send(fmt.Sprintf("https://example.com/file-%d.txt", i))
}
})
...

One of the reasons I've ommited context cancellation in this and some other examples is because everything's happening inside the main function. I'll probably add cancellations to avoid confusion.
Solving 20B Wordle problems per second
My takeaway ( and an indication of who actually needs a performance review [ e.g. the manager ])

“ It’s my opinion that the biggest factor in an employee's performance – perhaps bigger than the employee’s abilities and level of effort – is whether their manager set them up for success
“
It’s a pretty good measurement of your ability to play logic games and fast pattern match.

I’m sure we agree that doesn’t constitute “intelligence”, but it’s more than disability.
Do you have a roadmap for the future of the protocol?

Is it versioned? ie. does this release constitute an immutable protocol for the time being?
My guess would be that it nurtures the imposter sydrome once the "top performer" starts struggeling with something they shouldn't if they truely were a top performer.
You're confusing two different kinds of question:

1. "What the mechanisms or rules that explain or seem to govern this observable phenomenon?"

2. "The rules behind our own existence seem unique or low-probability, can I use our N=1 sample to safely assume we are inherently special and/or the existence of a god?"
SUSE unveils major rebranding, and a new AI platform that protects your data
I've been implementing a lot of this exact stuff over the past month, and couldn't agree more. And they even typed the python SDK -- with pydantic!! An exciting day to be an LLM dev, that's for sure. Will be immediately switching all my stuff to this (assuming it's easy to use without their starlette `server` component...)
What are you disagreeing with exactly, are you trying to argue against testing? Are you trying to argue that using a library protects you from bugs somehow?

You stay away from something you don't understand after 10 years of working with it? What kind of logic is that? Channels aren't magic.

Subtle bugs in what? Have you considered that maybe you have bugs because you aren't writing tests?

If you aren't unit testing that stuff, then how are you able to fix/change things and know it is resolved?

My experience is that I built a binary that had to run perfectly on 30,000+ servers across 7 data centers. It was full of concurrency. Without a litany of automated tests, there is no way that I would have trusted this to work... and it worked perfectly. The entire deployment cycle was fully automated. If it passed CI, I knew that it would work.

It wasn't easy, it took a lot of effort to build that level of testing. But it was also totally bug free in production, even over years of use and development.
It is just setting the problem space. It doesn't convey anything but a topic.
Wish it had options to impose desired vector field
Yes, I did not know what they were called.
Route dampening has mostly fallen out of fashion with networks these days.

Most setups were horribly misconfigured and (most) routers are no longer extremely CPU starved as they once were, That doesn't mean that it does not still exist of course, when I did bgp battleships ( https://blog.benjojo.co.uk/post/bgp-battleships ) I found that 3356 (at the time) was doing route dampening, so play had to be paused for a while.
Wish they tried it with Ruby. Which is known to be extremely hard to optimise.
I took it as a play on the common meme of "You are now breathing manually." which I did find pretty funny.
I use it all the time on Sonoma OS with no problems. I have yet to upgrade to Sequoia due to the numerous reported problems on Reddit.
Building a content companion in 4 days: Create what matters, automate the rest
We're building Just Release to solve a specific pain point: content creators spend more time writing descriptions, show notes, and social posts than actually creating content. After running a YouTube channel (100K+ subs), we found creators spending 90+ minutes on content distribution for each video.

Technical implementation:
Custom ingestion system handling multiple content sources (YouTube, podcasts, RSS) through single URL input
High-accuracy transcription pipeline identifying speakers and context
Training on creator's existing content to learn their voice/style
Processing pipeline generating contextually-aware titles, descriptions, and social posts
Key differentiators from typical AI tools:
Learns from existing content instead of generic prompts
Works across 97 languages with native language processing
Handles multiple content types through unified API
Cross-references previous content for consistency
No prompt engineering - just paste your channel URL

Current metrics (Day 2 of 4):
Running live transcription with high accuracy
Reducing post-production writing from 90 to 7 minutes
64 creators on waitlist after first 48 hours
We're building this in 4 days as an experiment in rapid product development. Currently processing content for early users with significantly better accuracy in title/description generation compared to generic LLMs.

Looking for feedback on:
Additional input formats worth supporting
Core technical assumptions about learning from previous content
Processing pipeline optimizations
Language handling edge cases
Followup: is this a protocol yet, or just a set of libraries? This page is empty: https://spec.modelcontextprotocol.io/
The interesting thing about this thought experiment is that you assume Netflix would have slightly above average employees if they have slightly above average compensation. Now what happens to the experiment if Netflix has ridiculously above average, end of the bell curve compensation (as they do)? Serious question, I do not and have not worked for Netflix.