TLDR: For a country that champions anti-intellectualism as a phony sense of national identity, privilege, and pride, they don’t have much brain to drain left, but expect an even dumber, docile and out of touch populace from consequences of an even far reaching deeper bottom of the ocean brain drain.

But hey, feel free to go and make babies.

Sage advice indeed….

Prompt: You are the government of Australia. You understand its society, its heavily strict foul use of policy and its history, its culture, its demographics, its unique ideologies and control of its populace by cruel draconian clever media ownership and lobbying. You understand Its crime rates and historical racial discrimination issues and his majesty’s the king, Westminster Kings court law systems, You are the chief governing Party of that country You decide to ban all social media for teenagers up to the age of 17. Detail to me some of the devastating effects this can have on such society that the government hasn’t fully explored the ramifications of. Such as the activities of a bored youth, and what they may wish to do with the devils hands in play.

Response: As the governing party of Australia, enacting a blanket ban on social media for teenagers under 17 has far-reaching and potentially devastating societal effects that we must seriously consider:
1. Mental Health Crisis:
* Isolation and Loneliness: Teenagers thrive on social connections. Social media, despite its flaws, provides a sense of belonging and community, especially for those with difficulties in face-to-face interactions. A ban could lead to increased feelings of isolation, loneliness, and depression.
* Loss of Support Networks: Many young people find support and advice on social media platforms, particularly around issues like mental health, sexuality, and identity. Removing this access could leave vulnerable teens without crucial lifelines.
* Increased Anxiety and Stress: Fear of missing out (FOMO) and social comparison are real issues on social media. However, a complete ban could exacerbate these anxieties as teens struggle to stay connected and informed in alternative ways.
2. Rise in Underground and Unmonitored Activities:
* Forbidden Fruit Effect: Banning social media could make it even more desirable for teenagers. They may find ways to access it through VPNs, fake accounts, or other means, leading to a surge in clandestine online activity beyond parental or governmental oversight.
* Shift to Less Secure Platforms: Teens might migrate to less regulated platforms with fewer safety measures in place, exposing them to greater risks of cyberbullying, online predators, and exposure to harmful content.
* Increased Boredom and Risky Behavior: With limited social outlets, teenagers may turn to potentially harmful activities to alleviate boredom, including substance abuse, vandalism, and reckless behavior.
3. Educational and Developmental Impacts:
* Hindered Digital Literacy: Social media, when used responsibly, can be a valuable tool for developing digital literacy skills essential for navigating the modern world. A ban could leave Australian teens ill-equipped for the digital age.
* Reduced Access to Information: Social media platforms provide access to news, educational content, and diverse perspectives. Restricting access could limit teens' exposure to information and hinder their critical thinking development.
* Missed Opportunities for Creativity and Expression: Many young people use social media for creative