skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My gut feeling is with where we're headed we'll clear that 200 pretty quickly in production cases, so we'd be interested in bit higher volume. Our dev efforts would probably clear that 200/mo. If the flow/backend was open-source that'd be a total game changer for us as I see it as an integral part of our product.

edit: I want to add here that while ycomb companies like yourself may have VC backing, a lot of us don't and do consider 500+/mo. base price on a service that is operations-limited to be a lot. You need to decide who your target audience is, I may not be in that audience for your SAAS pricing. This seems like a service that a lot of people need, but it also stands out to me as a service that will be copied at an extravagantly lower price. We have truly entered software as a commodity when I, a non-AI engineer, can whip up something like this in a week using serverless infra and $0.0001/1k tokens with gpt-o mini.
> but the ideals of the West were his destruction.

If you earnestly believe that, then he succeeded with his "Little green men" back in 2014. I legitimately think you are being hyperbolic about the "death of democracy" et. al. because the Ukraine incident is not unprecedented. The only thing that's new is America rolling over to give a shit - Crimea already proved to the world that the United States is more interested in domestic security than foreign affairs, and Ukraine is just reconfirming what we already know.

And look - while I personally want Ukraine to remain independent, you can't close your eyes to the realpolitik at play. America has virtually no reason to stand against Russia over Ukraine, besides to virtue signal the fact that they still consider Russia an adversary (which nobody really doubted anyways). Europe has a motivation to protect Ukraine to project their power and emphasize their defensive stance, but Ukraine also isn't part of NATO so not every nation is required to mobilize. Russia is the only power that can justify sending braindead-tier infantry waves into a meat grinder for the sake of recouping some USSR nostalgia. Nobody else cares enough, it's plain to see in the mobilizations.

> It's only worth is to show the West that they can't stop him and destroy the belief in the USA/EU/NATO/Democracy.

That's a very Western perspective. I think you're correct that this is what a lot of NATO members feel right now, but also NATO wasn't attacked. Russia has a lot of objectives in this war, and I feel confident that saying "sowing distrust among NATO members" wasn't the primary goal.
Pelicans are brutal mindless beasts. They are known to fly to neighbour nests and eat other birds, sometimes other pelicans.

So similar to companies.
"GATE" as a CIA/FBI Psyop is already a common schizo opinion on 4chan. Don't make it reality please.

(for those who don't know: https://www.reddit.com/r/HighStrangeness/comments/1fdg8io/wh...)
Arguably? Crunchyroll started as a pirate streaming site that hosted fansubs before they went legit.
Perhaps. I didn’t really read that much into GGP’s comment. I just wanted to point out that the comment does (minimally) rebut scientific racism. And by selectively omitting that rebuttal in the quote, GP makes it appear as if the denial of scientific racism is just a claim of faith.
People on HN are so ludicrously out of touch. Yes we all wish we could live in Hackerville and spend all day tweaking config files to customize our ultra fast rendering OSS terminal emulators. In the real world most people are not using terminals for the sake of fooling around with config files, they are trying to accomplish real tasks. For these people, paying for a terminal or using something that is login-gated is completely fine and acceptable if it makes you even 1% more productive. This is Warp's market. If you don't like it, go back to Wezterm or iTerm2 or whatever. Nobody has a gun to your head, those tools will always exist.
> it would make sense to put into place opportunities for gifted students and high achievers without regard for where they live or come from.

Quite obviously. That's what's being strip-mined at the moment.

I, and my peer group from "back home" would have had zero chances in life without these programs. We were not well off, and my peers did not come from families that had anything more than strong parenting - almost none had parents who had gone to college. They were tracked into gifted and talented programs at an early age by a school system that identified their highly capable students and resources were given to remove them from the "regular" track.

These programs have been removed since. It's holding those that need the most help back, while in no way hurting the people intended. The kids who have the ultra-parents with unlimited resources are going to private schools to begin with.

> If you only focus on churning out the most A-students possible without attempting to help those up to the level they can achieve, you end up with a serious nepotism / generational wealth issue where opportunities are hoarded by a different class of not-gonna-pay-it-back'ers. Legacy admissions, etc.

Short of extremely well-off suburbs (and neighborhoods in a handful of cities I suppose) this was never a thing in the public school system. Those generational wealth students don't touch the public school system at all. They are not relevant to the discussion and never have been.

> equality of opportunity

Correct. Equality of opportunity is what matters. The folks removing any gifted and talented programs, advocating for killing off magnet schools, etc. are the ones removing said opportunity in favor of equal outcomes. It's dragging everyone down to an extremely low bar and pretending they did something good.

Without inner city public school programs oriented towards the G&T crowd I would not be where I am today because my parents were working class at best. They were good parents, but they simply did not have resources to keep up with the "legacy" crowd. All they could do was try to get me into the "right" public schools and hope I'd be given a chance. This worked. Those programs are now gone - and anyone who grew up where I did in the same circumstances is more or less shit out of luck.

This is outright evil. Strong language and emotion be damned. It's deserved in this case.
""Make illegal states unrepresentable" is way too expensive to implement."

This has not been my experience. The speed increase in development not having to worry about the unrepresentable cases have been very valuable. In addition as requirements change migrating old data hasn't been a huge concern. For code changes refactoring the types helps address new cases as well.
They were buying less sugar and oil as ingredients to cook at home with. They were substituting home cooking by buying more ready-made foods and snacks that contained fat and sugar as components.
Why you should never kiss a baby on the head
There is definitely a need for this.

What I don't understand from quickly skimming your description and homepage: Do you source/provide the humans in the loop? That's a good value add, but how do I automatically / manually vet how you do the routing?
Bullshit. That's like claiming no one can play good football because the Cleveland Browns suck.

https://ronjeffries.com/xprog/articles/jatbaseball/
To your main point, I wouldn't say exactly that the component stores the state. But, rather that every component provides an initial value, possible events, and a default event handler which is a function from value to value. In effect, this is partially 'storing local state', but the above pieces can be composed to create a container component.

Note that there is no option really - the app wont be reimplementing how a key is handled in a text box. But composability means that the same principle should hold not just for OS/browser components but also for higher level components (A custom map or a tree-view where there are restrictions on types and number of nodes - these should also have default handling and delegation to upper levels.)

The global store choice makes it harder to have component libraries. But, the composable alternative has its problems too - redundancy and communication which skips layers (which requires 'context' in React).
I'm guessing you work at a small to medium sized company? Either that or you've likely been pushed into a role you dislike?

There are still people focusing on those 3 components nowadays, but it's because either they're so small they don't have to scale yet, or they're big enough they have an SRE/Devops/Whatever team that deals with the cloud crap so they can focus on the actual applications.
Interesting link, thanks.
Rivian gets $6.6B conditional loan approval to build Georgia EV plant
> When we talk about understanding a simple axiomatic system, understanding means exactly that the entirety of the axioms are modeled and applied correctly 100% of the time.

Yes, but then, when we talk about understanding in LLMs, we talk about existence, but not necessarily about determinism.

Remember that, while chess engines are (I guess?) deterministic systems, LLMs are randomized systems. You give the same context and the same prompt multiple times, and each and every time you get a different response.

To me, this, together with the fact that you have an at least 1-in-10 chance of getting a good move (even for strange scenarios), means that understanding _does exist_ inside the LLM. And the problem following from this is, how to force the LLM to reliably choose the right „paths of thought“ (sorry for that metaphor).
That's a very good point.

Germany was always brilliant at mechanical engineering, their universities are decent in general, but very good at all forms of mechanical/chemical engineering.

US is mad keen on software and entrepreneurship and its top universities churn out software startup founders like nowhere else. It's just a pity software ain't what it was 10 years ago.

Perhaps the deep cadres of really well educated engineers, and thus available work force, is the determining factor here.
I agree with regards to checked exceptions. Unfortunately Java doesn't support any form of polymorphism over thrown exceptions so it makes your code much harder to reuse. In languages that support polymorphic effects I imagine this is less of a concern.
I wish you the best of luck in fighting one buzzword with your new one. If it gains traction I'm sure it won't be used by the champions of your buzzword to sneak in their own desires instead of rigid adhereance to your definition.

I recently stumbled across a blog post from 2006 explaining all the problems commonly heard today about capital-A agile. That means we've spent at least 18 years faffing about letting conmen steamroll us that it can't be a con because there's a nugget of a good idea burred somewhere in there. Good ideas don't need branding. Branding is never a good idea.
Businesses/CEOs want to show profitability by spending less on human employees. Human consumers don't want to lose the human touch. Will be really interesting to see how many of the consumer facing AI startups actually make it.
They wouldn't have to combat misinformation if they actually told users what the switches turned on/off instead of vague descriptions that could plausibly allow them to do whatever the hell they want.
Congrats on the launch Dex!
Anthropic says Claude AI can match your unique writing style
One big problem here is that your ability to insist on your 4th amendment rights varies considerably. The further you are from all of affluent, straight, white, and male the more likely it is that you’ll experience pressure or retaliation if you persist in not cooperating, and in extreme cases that includes illegal detention, violence, or fabrication of evidence.

If your life is a repeating story of having to situationally decide where you’re likely to fall on that scale, you’re probably going to acquiesce because it’s the least stressful option – especially in this case where the easiest retaliation is almost unprovable by “accidentally” making you miss your flight.
A way to lay off with justification, then hire back cheaper talent? If i'm being cynical.
Government to temporarily stop robbing people after watchdog determines that the way they rob people may be a violation of their civil rights as the law says that the police must rob people without regard to their membership in protected classes.
> Good luck getting a functioning body without consuming carbohydrates, either.

The body doesn't need carbohydrates to function.

> The body also requires dietary sugar to function :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbohydrate

Again, the body does not :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketogenic_diet
Well you got me. I haven't watched broadcast TV for decades. I do see that phenomenon a lot with vloggers at present.

Am I also incorrect that they appear not to be looking directly at the camera? Looking back after your comment I still think it feels like they aren't.
Terrified of what? and First inning of what, when did that inning start?
It was code written in 2009 and private, not open source and I of course didn't take it with me when I left the company. I ran it for 4 years and we never had a single security incident. We took it very seriously. Partly because our code (in Java) was a rewrite from some really buggy PHP, that did in fact have a bunch of holes in it (and no testing).

You're also being absurd. We started this talking about golang testing and it has somehow gone off the rails to me having to prove things to you about XSS? Come on, what is with the hostility? Is this how you treated people while working at Google?
I've heard so many people say that podcasts are just something they have playing in the background while they do other things that I have no trouble believing that they'd play an AI podcast in the same way.
We plan to expand to all languages (the only real limits are languages with enough training data for LLMs / TTS models, so all popular languages)

Mandarin is just first for us because:

1. Thomas was already learning it

2. We can talk to users in English

3. We have some native-speaking friends who helped early

4. Has excellent support in AI products (second only to English)
Welcome to the J.J's Cyberia world!
If you like to have some fun -
just get on the dancefloor
and screeeeam like this!
Nnnnnnnnyaaaah!
I'm mostly focusing on sqlite-as-the-data-source, but I can imagine something like this might be in scope for a project like lunr.js[1], which currently uses a large index served as JS/JSON. You can write a Jekyll plugin in a few lines of ruby code (with no gem management needed, just drop it in the _plugins directory), so the "write-index-to-a-sqlite-file" part shouldn't be hard to build either.

Is FTS5 included in the SQLite browser builds? The SQLite amalgamation includes it by default.

[1]: https://lunrjs.com/docs/index.html
Like I said, there were some exceptions. But the current state is reversed: most games ship broken/incomplete at launch, and the exceptions are when a game is actually complete and relatively bug-free.

It's not a matter of not relying on patches or updates altogether. The issue is when companies use this as a crutch to offset their shoddy development practices. Or worse: scamming consumers into buying their broken/incomplete game, and then taking years to deliver a stable experience or what they advertised (No Man's Sky, Fallout 76, Cyberpunk 2077, etc.), shutting down (Redfall, The Day Before, etc.), or straight up taking the money and running. Consumers are lucky if they even get their money back. Thankfully most storefronts have decent refund policies, but that's not an excuse.

The saddest thing is that a lot of people either don't care, or end up forgetting about this if companies appear to work hard to ship updates, which is how they eventually gain their good will back. The reputations of studios like Hello Games, CDPR and even Bethesda are practically untarnished despite of their scams, which gives them the freedom to keep doing this.
The issue is deeper than that: it's that we take some singular conception of what a dog is, and ruthlessly beat any deviation from that idealized dog out of all the individual dogs. Which ends up being every dog.
You raise a completely valid point that "fascism" is used in exactly the same way by the left political spectrum.

But this does not make the use of woke as a generic accusation any better.

> I simply do not believe anymore that people don't know what others mean when they say "woke"

The insiduous thing about this is: Different people do mean different things with this.

Some people are maybe against depicting women in leadership roles; others might not want to normalize homosexuality. Another group might want to keep any mention of transgenderism away from their kids. Someone else might just want to see more racist jokes about Mexicans. All those views are radically different; a lot of those "anti-woke" views would not even agree with each other.

By allowing weasely standpoints like that in a debate, you make it very easy for people to claim broad support for stupid and bigoted views without having to justify them.

So, in the context of western comics, what does "too much woke" mean to you?
This also turns up in Serial Experiments Lain as the name of the café/nightclub https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUO2jAiQb0g
I should clarify comments was with respect to F35. I'm not disputing the importance of stealth, but depending on how far stealth detection has progressed, stealth may be merely table stakes. We know where stealth sits on the continuum relative to none stealth, but not relative to modern anti stealth, i.e. LO/VLO may be substantially less survivable vs modern sensors / detection methods vs 20 years ago. Question is, has incremental improvements in coating extended the gap, maintained it, or diminished relative to detection. Doesn't mean stealth is obsolescent (if anything it would become MORE necessary), but not standing still doesn't mean not getting lapped by detection/tracking/targetting potentially improving at faster pace.

When I say LO emphasis materials over shaping, with respect to F35, I mean F35 is not an opmital shaped flying wing for stealth. It has optimized shaping for what it is - an ellipitcal wing designed for multi role. It's compromised shaping relative to say, a B21, or renders of NGAD (both flying wings), and likely further fat amy belly compromise to accomodate S/VTOL (vs F22 or even J35 geometry), hence F35 has suboptimal shaping relative to optimal stealth planform. My understanding is coating can reduce RCS by another 30% on top of geometry, ~10% less detection range (inverse fourth power law), which is not catastrophic if lost. But at same time, math suggest incremental coating advancements, which F35 is stuck with to improve stealth, since geometry is locked, means it won't be game changing, it's merely what there is. Hence I'm not convinced incremental coating improvement is enough. IMO pretty telling most 6th gen proposals (even though renders) are all flying wing or blended delta wings.

And as much as F35 coating is improved relative to F22, this report suggests it's still maintenance nightmare. As for whether coatings are difficult to catchup, PRC has got very good material science in last 10 years. It seems more easy to iterate than engines.
There was a Swedish case recently where a signal group of over 1000 people was infiltrated. (I think it was this one: https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/uppdrag-i-gruppchatt-morda-... - sound only. Sorry)

No e2e is going to help you if you invite the cops to your group chat I guess.
Zebra Coral Habitat Found 80km Further North in Japan, Hinting at Climate Impact
You are likening American football to communism? So which regime is Cleveland Browns, and which are the functional ones?
This looks really slick!
That is a pretty wild movie.

Back in the mid 90's my high school physics teacher made us watch it.

It is probably the most realistic depiction of what would happen if a nuclear war broke out.
> For these people, paying for a terminal or using something that is login-gated is completely fine

Those people don't use a terminal.
The younger generation loves short-form, to-the-point stuff. Which is the exact opposite of what the current crop of GenAI makes. In a tiktok video, every sentence, every word counts because there's a time limit. If people don't engage with your content in the first 3 seconds, it's worthless. The video linked in another post starts off with 15 seconds of complete fluff. You'd have better engagement if you have a guy opening with BIIIG NEWS!! LABOR DAY BREAKFAST GOES HAYWIRE!!! and hook people.

GenAI is great at generating "stuff", but what makes good content isn't the quantity. What makes good content is when there's nothing left to take away.
You still don't need monads for any of this. Monads give you an ad-hoc polymorphic way of doing monadic actions.

Short circuiting on `Either` is a specific case of this. You can define your own EitherBind in any language.

eitherBind :: Either e a -> (a -> Either e b) -> Either e b
eitherBind (Left e) _ = Left e
eitherBind (Right a) f = f a

Now you can bind over Either to your heart's content without needing an encoding of Monads in your language.
So true. 90% of Agile practitioners give the rest a bad reputation.
That is quite a claim that Tiktok can do all that.
I suspect the trigger was the realization recent especially egregious cases were being prepared for court cases, which were likely to be won.

Agencies like this would rather voluntarily pull back to prevent a court ruling setting precedent. The agency can always bring back similar measures in different forms or with different supposed safeguards but a court ruling is beyond their control.
Screw off with the implication that I didn't read it. The stated reason is likely BS. Various parties have been getting kickbacks of various types for decades but now it's a problem? I'll restate my question, why now?
Clickbait title for a decent write-up. The author left Hawaii, and as indicated in the article the local press resorted to AI presenters because it was hard to keep talent on board. This is not a "job replacement" story so much as a "backup plan" story in my opinion.
The horrible AI driven answers that are more wrong than right are very much present in the EU though.
Holy cow, "problematic" is an understatement. So the airline employee gives a list of people who don't have enough time to assert their rights, the DEA confiscated any cash they found, and then gave what sounds like a kickback.

1. The data breach of personal information from the airline to the DEA.

2. The DEA performing any search at all. I can't imagine a world in which "Booked a flight on short notice" should be considered probable cause.

3. The DEA confiscating money. The unconstitutionality of civil forfeiture has been well discussed.

4. The DEA paying for the ongoing data breach. With payments "over several years", that isn't just a finder's fee, that's an ongoing business relationship.

Egads.
People were happy with the included wired iPhone earbuds for years, even though they were terrible.

Listening on a laptop speaker Sumo sounds fine. Listening on my wireless earbuds it is... ok. I am too lazy anymore to pull out any of my high quality wired headphones, and if somebody who used to care about sound quality enough to purchase multiple HQ headphones can't be arsed, then the general pubic really is going to think everything is just fine.
I personally will pay a subscription for literally every piece of software I use if it means the software makes me more productive. On an hourly basis my time is worth more than $100/hr. That means if a subscription tool is $10/month it only needs to save me 6 minutes of time, per month, to make it worth it.
I mean the entire point of even having loop invariants is that you provably know what the properties of the program state are after the loop.

An assertion can tell you if one of your assumptions is incorrect.

Combined with fuzz testing, you can have much higher confidence that your code is correct.

This is a stronger guarantee of program correctness than any set of unit tests you're likely to write.