skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
- the way to manage this risk is to include buffer in the project timeline, and, critically, to use that buffer not for development tasks that were harder than expected, but for re-planning and re-negotiating the deliverables with stakeholders, to un-explode the project. Agile builds this re-evaluation into the project lifecycle, which is the main (maybe only?) thing is does really right.

This is the only right answer. Unfortunately, engineering leadership is too detached from understanding how software works. They think of projects like contractor painting jobs. So easy to estimate - sq. ft * number of people * number of hours.

But software is not like that. Software is constantly changing every hour, every day. As a result, any estimation is changing every hour every day.

The best thing is for leadership to start acknowledging the realm they are dealing with. If they can't they should step down.

But realistically, engineers should always give 400% padding with estimates. The root cause of this estimation is poor leadership. It is not engineering team's problem that detached management doesn't understand software.
Another moto / cycle rider here. Recent phenomenon that makes me weep for road going competency: Phone or tablet on a suction cup mount playing YouTube, Netflix, whatever. Preferably at night with the screen 4" from your face to really make visual acuity dicey.

I thought this was a one-off, but I see probably 5-10 of these idiots a week.
Anything that you say is missing can be added. I'm no expert but when I had some confusion about the stack I would create a word that did something in a balanced way, test it quickly, and use that word instead to build on. Forth makes it easy to climb the levels abstraction quickly.

The method that it uses to interpret/compile a word varies by implementation. Subroutine call is just one of them.
For what it's worth, I am not the OP of the forum thread, but I found it interesting. I am especially fascinated that he was referred to the executive outreach team and they basically gave him the middle finger.

> Just spoke with Apple executive relations, the lady I’ve been in touch with. Decided to call her after her not replying to my email a week ago. She said she was the one in charge of the investigation and it’s done. Case closed.

> She said if the Police want to get ahold of Apple they can on their own and I explained to her that the police don’t know how to contact higher ups at Apple to explain the laptops were stolen, because they had to ask me for the number and she kept saying the Police should have a way to contact Apple. But they shouldn’t contact her. These are street cops that have never dealt with Apple before.

> She had a very cold demeanor. She just doesn’t want anything to do with me.

That - and the fact that Apple is using Uber Eats to deliver laptops in the first place.
What is it that you believe there is consensus about?
If you don’t read what you sign, it’s not uninformed consent. It’s you being an idiot.
It would be a chance to become a hero of humanity that 99% of the world would cheer on...
Yes, the rest of the article is filled with gems like:

> tweaked the algorithm to amplify his own often false and conspiracy-filled tweets.

Which fittingly is a conspiracy itself.
Unless a Master's is required for your profession, only do it if you are intellectually curious and have the cash to burn.
There's jurisdiction questions there since neither Iraq nor the US are Rome Statute signatories, however Palestine is a signatory.
I assume hardly anyone remembered, or payed much mind, to the origin of that word by the 1920s. I don't know who coined 'homophobia' or 'feminism' or many other concepts; they're just common words we use.
> My evidence is that you need a special endorsement already to drive things that are more powerful or complex than a car

In Canada, a standard car license allows driving vehicles up to 11,000 kg (24,250 lbs) [0], including pickup trucks and SUVs that are larger than a WWII Sherman tank [1], such as the Ford F-350 or the Cadillac Escalade [2].

Thus, we are allowing people to drive things that are far more powerful than a car without special licensing requirements -- and without a speed governor.

So it is already pretty lax in terms of licensing requirements for vehicles that kill and maim our neighbors every year. We should be even stricter than we are.

[0] https://drivetest.ca/licences/licences-overview/

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M4_Sherman

[2] https://www.carsized.com/en/cars/compare/cadillac-escalade-2...
"Although there are many times in life you’ll consciously decide to act in a certain way, this is the exception, not the norm."

IMO, that's the most important idea there. Your personality is what you've created to live among others like you, but as your personality grows, it develops habits that have weight and momentum, and later in life those habits start defining your actions completely, you get progressively smaller windows for true self expression, and your life starts feeling dull and mechanical.

Your attention is the only thing that's truly yours.
They're using the current common terminology for the phenomenon, which does not have the roots you claimed it has.
That was my first thought; lots of developers talk out loud to themselves when working through code.
Let me know how that works out for you!
Web search has never been about this, where are you getting this fable from? It was about finding pages that include certain words, why would you overmistify this.
See perhaps "Oxide Cloud Computer Tour - Rear":

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJmw9OICH-4
we use it and are fairly happy. but provider latency is insanely high (500ms+) for embedding models. best to host on-cluster.
hybrid quality is good but modification options are extremely limited and the score very obscure for anything but ranking within the set.
> the entire planet would likely need 384GB of RAM

Unlikely. Even with turn costs enabled 256GB (or less) are sufficient. You could also try to disable CH as for bike often no long routes are required (you could disable them). Here we have written down a few more details: https://www.graphhopper.com/blog/2022/06/27/host-your-own-wo...
The difference with property hooks and userland getter/setters is that you're now just doing

echo $obj->prop
$obj->prop = 'bar';

not

echo $obj->getProp();
$obj->setProp('bar');
Custom handwired (maybe with amoeba pcbs to help) keyboard, there are a lot of designs out there.
A significant portion of the US economy uses Israeli developed cybersecurity products. I wonder if there are any backdoors Mossad uses to consolidate influence.
> Inheritance is not a banned practice.

Maybe it should be. Go and Rust do not provide implementation inheritance, and I think that's for the best. Few language features have led to so much spaghetti code.

> It should just be your second choice when there's a better path through composition. Do you see one here?

I don't think this logic should be split over a graph of objects at all. This is highly cohesive code; it shouldn't be factored apart. If Metz made it clear that this was an example just for the purposes of illustration, that'd be one thing. However, the stance taken is "this is good code, and you should try to write all your code like this." It's not, though, and you shouldn't.
There seems to be some sort of "grey zone" opportunity for this deliveries...
What others high value items / brands is Uber Eats courier for ?
How do you expect properties to interact with IDEs?

The argument that C# choosing to offer features that lead to terser implementation seems orthogonal to where you write it. Behavior in property getters and setters may as well be completely hidden from the caller. But the standard expectation is that accessing and/or setting a property should be cheap and not involve much logic, which most of the code out there adheres to.

(and personally I'm finding it to be a more productive experience than any dynamically typed language which always feels like stone age regardless of the environment)
How does that work in an open office with colleagues all around you?
It is a report that was correctly widely criticized. Certainly worth reading, but worth being aware of this.

(I personally think that estimating that the eventual death toll will be 4x higher than the somewhat-verified death toll that exists today, based on guesses of the impact of the war on the population, is very disingenuous and misleading, and mostly a way to just be able to say much higher numbers.)
This is also the fault of shit-tastic middleware boxes which block any protocol they don't understand-- because, hey, it's "more secure" to default-fail, right?-- so every new type of application traffic until the end of time has to be tunneled over HTTP if it wants to work over the real Internet.
I don't think anyone who spent more than 5 minutes in academia post undergrad is surprised that BSchool research is rotten. Their purpose is to rub shoulders with wealthy donors, not produce science.
So to quote yourself:

> Well, clearly you're not interested in experimentation
Thanks, I have done a bit of research of carbon:nitrogen etc. I think it is lack of volume. it still produces good compost, just takes longer.
That's the point, it doesn't matter what the origin was, how it is being used now is what is being critiqued.
What the war in Ukraine is showing is that Russia is capable of running a wartime economy, cranking out artillery shells etc at replacement rates, while Europe, so far, has not demonstrated the ability to do so, which is why supplies are dwindling - you can only run so far on existing stocks.

It should also be noted that Ukraine has been preparing for this exact scenario since 2014, building massive fortifications in the east (which is precisely why the Russian advance there has always been such a grind).

In the event of an open confrontation between Russia and European countries currently backing Ukraine, it's not at all a given that the latter can hold significantly better than Ukraine does today, without American help. European armed forces are generally in a pathetic shape, grossly undermanned and underfunded, and would simply run out of materiel before Russia runs out of bodies to throw at them.
> If you mean to imply that Europe is somehow going to shoot down their planes if they fly over that’s obviously absurd.

Shoot down? No.

Force them down? There's precedent. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evo_Morales_grounding_incident
Current ARM servers actually generally offer "on par" (varies by workload) perf/Watt for generally worse absolute performance (varies by workload) i.e. require more other overhead to achieve the same total perf despite "on par" perf/Watt.

Need either Apple to get into the general market server business or someone to start designing CPUs as well as Apple (based on the comparison between different ARM cores I'm not sure it really matters if they do so using a specific architecture or not).
>Unless all 32 servers have redundant AC power feeds present, you've traded one single point of failure for another single point of failure.

Is this not standard? I vaguely remember that rack severs typically have two PSUs for this reason.
Right, so the word as it's used today is what we're talking about. It's being used as a weapon to silence criticism of Israel and Zionism in general.
The double edged sword is that proving an ongoing crime maybe stops it from unfolding but anything other than a conviction is presented as an endorsement and encouragement to continue. That could be fine if there's really no crime, not so fine if the crime just couldn't be proven.

Considering here the old adage that absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. They both lead to the same verdict from a court of public opinion point of view, and realistically the same consequences from a court of justice.
The interest is in the broad trend.

This clearly telegraphs a few things for those that are observant enough to notice.

Anyone interested in going into that field who has a brain would note that they are removing the entry level jobs using this since those are the simpler jobs.

With less demand for said labor, the more cutthroat the competition to get said jobs will be. If you double the competition, wages must naturally drop and with that so does competency and skill. When proficiency isn't rewarded, those with options go elsewhere.

When any other job with 1/10th the responsibility gets paid the same, its a simple no brainer choice.

When industry with large marketshare telegraphs this, it is a strong indicator that IT operations (in this case) will soon be a dead profession (soon being a relative generation), and anyone investing in education for it will get a negative ROI.

Upfront, they companies may get some profits off the bottom-line, but long-term they won't be able to find or keep talent. Said talent will have left and you get Atlas Shrugged dynamics.

Aside from that, that type of strategy also suggests other cascading dynamics that lead to grid/societal collapse following a burning the bridges approach. Those in their ivory towers may not see the consequences of their choices until it is too late for anything except coffin nails.

The fundamental issue of market sector concentration where few parties cooperate is that counter-party systemic risk becomes unmanageable and chaotic, destructive decisions cannot be softened.

In chaotic feedback systems, the general rule of thumb is chaos increases until the underlying imbalance is equalized.

For some, recognizing the inevitable conclusion of a series of events may dictate a radically altered approach towards life planning/survival.
> Even so, anyone who has any cursory experience with TypeScript projects that follow a functional style can tell you without any doubt whatsoever that functional style is incomparably harder to refactor than any "enterprise-grade" OOP.

My experience differs greatly. One can see functional style has taken off in the TS world, particularly with the popularity of React, so I suspect I'm not alone.
I would be very surprised, humans evolved in Africa where there is no Winters like what exist in the far north. So my answer, no.
Why not the US?

The aren't signatories to the ICC.
... complains the neighborhood rapist.
Second this. My daughter is in 3rd grade and loves these.
Hey - Thanks for sharing!

Will take a closer look later but if you are hanging around now, it might be worth asking this now. I read this blog post recently:

https://adamkarvonen.github.io/machine_learning/2024/06/11/s...

And the author talks about challenges with evaluating SAEs. I wonder how you tackled that and where to look inside your repo for understanding the your approach around that if possible.

Thanks again!
I like to write down any mistakes I make or see myself make, since I don't always have a QA team, but I'm not exactly trying to prevent the mistake.

I think of the thoughts in my head like LLM output. I don't expect it to be right every time, my job is to make it useful without relying on it.

If I make a mistake, I don't just think "I'll do better next time" I think "Why was that even possible".

Sounds like you're already doing great if this only happens occasionally!
Totally agree! That's what we've observed, as well.
If you think the "confirmed" data is unreliable, what makes you think you know the "real" number? How is your number any more reliable?
> "just make it work one way or another, who cares if it's a hardcoded string, we have to ship the fix ASAP"

Sure, but now that there's a "correct" way to do this, you don't get to complain that the hacky thing you did needs to keep being supported. You fix the hacky thing you did, or you make peace that you're still doing the hacky thing, problems it causes and all.
A DC busbar can propagate a short circuit across the rack, and DC circuit protection is harder than AC. So of course each server now needs its own current limiter, or a cheap fuse.

But I’m not debating the merits of this engineering tradeoff - which seems fine, and pretty widely adopted - just its advertisement. The healthcare industry understands the importance of assessing clinical endpoints (like mortality) rather than surrogate measures (like lab results). Whenever we replace “legacy” with “cloud”, it’d be nice to estimate the change in TCO.
Not to say it is or is not but isn’t that what everyone does? Wegschauen.
Very cool work! Any plans to integrate it with SAELens?
> document the secret "oral tradition" of top mathematician

> A good number of Abel prize winners & Fields medallists have read my book and found it important and accurate. It's been blurbed by Steve Strogatz and Terry Tao.

Sounds like people mostly living in different bubbles? What do they know about the world?

They aren't hanging out with the kids who fail in school because maths and reading and writing is to hard, and then start selling drugs instead and get guns and start killing each other.

> [they] don't think it's because of their genes

Do you think someone would tell you, if he/she thought it was?

I mean, that can come off as arrogant? Wouldn't they rather tend to say "it was hard work, anyone can do it" and prioritize being liked by others

> Pareto-like distribution like what we see in math

Unclear to me what you have in mind. If there's a graph it'd be interesting to have a look? I wonder whats on the different axis, and how you arrived at the numbers and data points
On the one hand, I never realized that map iteration order was consistent, but it's just the starting point that changes. On the other hand, I guess there's no other way to do it, since a proper shuffle would require O(n) bookkeeping. I suppose you could also flip a coin for going backwards too.
That's amazing. Thanks.
You can see the this covered in the mod comments, toplevel positive fluff is fine. Most of it doesn't go anywhere (as in, it's not like these end up the top of the thread and collect fluffreplies) and are, at a minimum, not worth policing.
I recently played Emacs tetris, and I was confused by how the tetrominos were selected so I dove into the source code to impress my boyfriend. It turns out that the tetrominos' behavior is configurable with a defcustom, but by default it chooses to play without the bag rule, making their tetris hard to take seriously as an implementation for competitive play >:c
I think you've commented on the wrong thread.
Solving 40-year mystery, scientists ID chemical in tap water
I very often have an internal dialogue going on but for some reason when I'm walking my dog I start talking out loud. Not loud, I whisper, but my jaw moves etc.

During our walks I rarely encounter other people but when it happens I feel a bit embarrassed. Maybe I should just put some headphones and just pretend I'm in a call like the writer in the article (Ellie Shoja).
You can change the settings to switch directly to the HDMI port connected to your AppleTV.

The AppleTV remote will also turn your TV on and off automatically
ZeroMQ is kinda nice for this; just the right level of thin abstraction.
I have yet to see a language which does units better than F#: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fsharp/language-ref... It is one of the main reasons I use F# over other functional languages.

Doing it within an existing type system is more trouble than it’s worth: the algebra of units is simple, but it doesn’t apply to other types without stretching the compiler. It is far easier to have a distinct subsystem with measure types specifically identified.
And if you didn't pay via card, take Apple to small claims court.

The escalation paths are pretty simple here.
Very deep dive, thank you for sharing it all. So cool it traverses callbacks too.
Nonsense. Buy an LG TV of any kind. Never connect it to the internet. Plug in an Apple TV (or Linux HTPC box of your choice). Ad-free TV at consumer prices.

edit: not just OLED
At the very least localstorage is supported across the board
AWS open sourced Amazon Q CLI (previously fig.io)
The person you are replying to didn't imply that it was military aid. They said it was to strengthen Hamas and weaken the Palestinian Authority. I have no idea if that's true or not, but it's a different claim than you are challenging.
The typical route to the US from Israel passes over much of Europe.
There are a significant number of zionist users on this site that immediately flag any comment or article they percieve as anti-israel.
Jas, a minimal hobby x64 ELF assembler library – done
This reminds me of "unstable orbits in the space of lives", a short story by Greg Egan.
> This is exactly backwards. Voting software ideally would not be used at all, but if it is used it should at least be open source.

Ideally, yes. But you can't have it both ways. Having closed software suddenly disclosed does indeed allow for bad actors to perform analysis and figure out '0 days' without the opportunity to patch.

Opening the source should have been done years ago, way before any elections took place. That allows time for responsible disclosure and any required patching.

I'd like to know what other measures were taken to secure the machines themselves. It doesn't matter how secure your system is, if the machine is physically compromised, all bets are off. I'd also like to know how the data is validated and collected once it's been tallied.
When it comes to education, creativity, and LLMs, usually the LLMs stifle the creativity and the education. At least, in real world scenarios that have been reported upon.

https://time.com/7026050/chatgpt-quit-teaching-ai-essay/
Our journey to Snowflake monitoring mastery – Canva Engineering Blog
'Forward Deployed Engineering' and Why You Probably Shouldn't Do It
What is 13% of 91?
I don't know. Do you?
But I now 10% of 91 is 9.1
I got somewhere eh?
Hey also I know that 1% of 91 is 0.91 Duh! lets triple that.
0.91 x 3 = 0.9x3 + 0.01x3 = 2.7 + 0.03 = 2.73
Now lets add 9.1..
11.83 Weee!
(Now my date is rolling her eyes and the waiter is stone faced)
Operation Timber Sycamore.
If everyone gets major that leads to high income, market will become oversaturated quickly

.5% of income over lifetime of alumni is very long-term investement

Universities are well aware of that and obviously won't self-sabotage in such dumb way

More likely outcome is that universities will ensure that most talented students will get high income majors
Two thoughts

1) It's tragic that being "bad at math" is often positioned as some kind of badge of honour.

2) It's definitely not the case that everyone is capable of mathematical thinking. Having spent a certain amount of time trying to teach one of my kids some semblance of mathematical thinking, I can report confidently that his ability in this area is almost non-existent. His undeniable skills lie in music and writing, but definitely not in maths.

Yes, music and maths have some things in common. But musical thinking is not mathematical thinking.
Isn't there a third option?

Where those statements are available to the plaintiff to evaluate for evidence of, but the underlying communication is not allowed to be presented to the jury because it is prejudicial until it is established that the x had a real foreseeable issue?
I loved doing chemistry experiments and demos at home as a kid. I had books like the Golden Book of Chemistry Experiments [1] but this is a modern guide that I would gladly recommend:

Illustrated Guide to Home Chemistry Experiments: All Lab, No Lecture by Robert Bruce Thompson

https://www.amazon.com/Illustrated-Guide-Home-Chemistry-Expe...

[1] https://library.sciencemadness.org/library/books/Brent_GBC.p...
Proposal to Bump Perl's Next Version from 5 to 42
Interactive Explorer for Formal Specifications