skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Fun read, thanks.

I also wrote a 5ish line python script that instead of logging keys, presses them. I used it to avoid idle detection in a game a few years ago. Similarly to you, I found it somewhat disconcerting how easy it was. This was on windows though.
What makes a skill useful?
Any examples, at least when it comes to industries?
how are they looking inside the packet if it's encrypted?
Yes but it’s not like those producing code don’t do those other things. You would expect typical commits to reflect the time lost to other typical activities right?
>> Problems… —PH

With gratitude, i’d already riffen on this with “… [YC] proved its salt…”

Riffing on the schlep of “talking to users” my current (more designori-oriented?) variant is “building a marketplace Elon style”
I don't trust Russia either, but are you certain that's a real memory? I'm not aware of any confirmed incidents in which USSR bombers actually flew within sight of Fairbanks. They routinely tested our defenses but they didn't penetrate that far into US airspace.
My Minimal MacBook Pro Setup Guide
From the abstract:

"Studies suggest muscle loss with these medications (as indicated by decreases in fat-free mass [FFM]) ranges from 25% to 39% of the total weight lost over 36–72 weeks. This substantial muscle loss can be largely attributed to the magnitude of weight loss, rather than by an independent effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists, although this hypothesis must be tested. By comparison, non-pharmacological caloric restriction studies with smaller magnitudes of weight loss result in 10–30% FFM losses."

The "surprising" part is kinda bullshit, and implies there's something special about glp-1s. It is the opposite of surprising that weight loss includes a lean mass loss.

That said, being skinnyfat is probably bad for you and the idea that you should work to preserve/build muscle and not only lose weight is a good one.
Not yet, but maybe you? :)
Not supporting arm is dead on arrival for anyone looking to build cross platform...
great presentation, thanks for sharing :)
Utterances
Yep. The internet is an infinite copy machine. All you have to do is copy the lies an order of magnitude more than the truth, and Bob’s your uncle (whether you’re related to Bob or not).
Ugh, all the companies that start with S and use Ruby. My bad. Got thrown off because they have Sorbet stuff in Ruby LSP and other Sorbet tools. They have 1.1k Github repos... Lots of TS, Go, Rust and lots of non-Rails things...
Clone of the Queens Game on LinkedIn
The headers are seen by the monster-in-the-middle CDN.

It's obfuscation at best. I'm not sure the encrypted traffic will look particularly php-ish for example. Compressed formats might look vaguely passable.

I can't see any stenography code or libraries in the repo.
With some TNT or cutting charges and an electronic device (timer/detonator)?

I didn’t propose the initial idea, but it actually could probably work if the plane was flying [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001021802...], and [https://tetrazolelover.at.ua/WpnryInTheWoods/Zhang2015_Artic...]. You’d want to run some significant calculations first to get the airspeed/timing just right, but yeah.

It would be one hell of a show. Like a tactical nuke, probably.

Edit: did the math because I was curious. A fully fueled 747 contains approximately 9 trillion joules of energy worth of fuel (not counting any payload, or the energy in its aluminum fuselage - which would be significant). A ton of TNT equivalent is 4.181 gigajoules. So the fuel load of a 747, if properly detonated, would be “equivalent” to a 2KT nuclear bomb.

A 747 has a maximum payload capacity of an additional 100-120 tons.
> All companies should be truthful, forthcoming, and specific about how they will use your data, but…

I'm fairly sure, if you read the terms-and-conditions, it probably said that the company owns this data and can do what they want with it.

> There’s no reason to hold out for a company to pay you for your geolocation data because none of them offer that service.

Well, it can make perfect sense (to some people) to hold out forever in that case.
Available to play here: https://queens-linkedin.vercel.app/
I thought this was so well done. Wanted to share with HN community too. (I didn't make it)
I miss Google of 2003

What would it take for someone to make it today? No AI, only 1 on mobile, and sites with heavy ad loads are punished
> In this post we take you on a walkthrough on how you can use DataFusion

Thought it was gonna be a "build your own SQLite" or something
1) I don't think it's related to Next, per se, but there may be behavior I didn't build the expertise to comment on. I also know that there were major inefficiencies in the application, so, for example, our P90 latency was (imo) terrible.

2) We'd have to define what constitutes low traffic vs any other arbitrary measure, so it's moot to discuss like this; all I said it wasn't high traffic. You could run it for cheaper, but there wasn't much expertise for self-hosting, for example.

3) For all I remember it may have been half that in daily cost. In any case, miniscule compared to engineer time. What was worse was the prior decision to use serverless aurora rds, that dwarfed everything else in AWS cost - I know this is tangentially related, just saying optimizing that a bit more was not the highest priority, we could do it for cheaper.
It is fine to sound like a grumpy old developer. We have clients using nextjs and it might have its place if you have apps in active development with dedicated teams, however for LoB apps for instance that don't change a lot and/or don't have continued dev or a dedicated team over time, it's a bad choice imho. Personally, I consider it a terrible choice always, because of the churn mostly; the current info in SO and LLMs is often wrong because of that churn. Best practices change and you have to pin everything or things auto-break. We get hired for a lot of $ to fix that in emergence settings, but I rather would have that people not use this stuff at all. It's not even a good dev experience imho, but I guess that's personal as either others are resume-devving and lying or just have another idea about what is a nice experience.
That's not how any of this works, at all. Please take the time to at least take a look an introductory Wikipedia article about the legal system. (For starters, "pleading the fifth" applies only to testimony of a human being which may cause him to be personally accused of a crime. It has zero relevance to the question of accessing archived emails and chat logs sitting on a hard drive which is owned by a corporation accused of a civil violation.)
Well, there are a few things you should consider.

OpenWRT is undoubtedly using busybox. I actually saw the busybox copyright on a point-of-sale terminal at Old Navy a few years ago. The embedded realm is vast, and bash is too big for it, or intolerable because of gplv3.

Android uses mksh as the system shell. The more that you know of the korn dialects, the more comfortable you will be in scripting on Android. There is no native bash, as Android's userland is BSD. That realm is also vast.

Finally, Debian/Ubuntu does give you /bin/bash, but if you don't understand the need for "set -o posix" then the scripts that you wrote for CentOS will fail in many interesting ways, because you are carrying the baggage of bash's first decade, before the POSIX shell standard.

So yes, cutting your scripting away to pure POSIX.2 has considerable worth. It runs everywhere.
Maybe you’ve worked on better teams than I have. There are some folks who only care about their feature and getting their JIRA item across the board vs the quality of the product they are building and the overall health of the team. Some of these types may have more commits, but they’re not always great team players or great people to work with.

Metrics might suggest these engineers are the most valuable and productive, but in reality, they can be a significant drain on teams and projects. They don’t actively participate in code reviews, show little concern for performance and code quality, and rarely contribute to support efforts or keeping dependencies current. Their lack of collaboration and accountability makes them challenging teammates and ultimately hinders the team’s success. There’s more to being a good software engineer and teammate than the number of and size of commits.
A Tale of Two Cities also has a beautiful (and famous) closing passage.
Agree - that’s what we use too.
... which no-one (rounding error in % of companies) needs.
> [...] when it was released did not exist in the same data hellscape we do today [...]

That was fairly obvious at the time. And people used more or less exactly the same language to describe the world back then, too.

> These kinds of comments are extraordinarily disingenuous sounding, particularly when anyone can spend 3 seconds and figure out their primary market is literal children.

Poke Mongo was popular with people of all age groups, and (most) children have parents or other guardians to help them with these decisions.
This is inevitable when senior leadership has lost all touch with reality and no longer knows what reasonable expectations are or "what good looks like".
> somewhat broken

bit of an understatement there
> I have been tricked into working to contribute training data so that they can profit off my labor.

you werent tricked - your location data doesn't belong to you when you use the game.

I don't get why people somehow feel that they are entitled to the post-facto profit/value derived from the data that at the time they're willingly giving away before they "knew of" the potential value.
They don't. The symbol is NET. But I think Twitter lets you use $ as an alternative to # (hashtag), and people use it specifically in front of stock symbols, and now it's becoming customary to prefix stock symbols with $ everywhere.
Most children have parents or other guardians.
That's the wrong framing. The NOx and SOx emissions were going to have to go eventually. It's true that it might have been better to phase it out over a year or two so it was less of a shock as the hard deadline that ended up hapenning, but we couldn't keep constantly polluting forever (which is the only way to keep those aerosols in the air).

Sulphur regulations just unmasked some of the global warming that had already happened, but that masking was only ever going to be temporary in the long run.
Its strange people of every generation, almost everyday keeps discovering the need for Perl.

Perl was made to solve precisely these kind of problems.

Just use Perl. Its fast, matured, has CPAN and is dedicated to maintaining backwards compatibility for years to come. Using anything else will not make all that much sense. You will be reinventing a whole universe(and badly from scratch). And achieve nothing at the end.
I don't blame them. If buying isn't owning, then downloading isn't stealing.
I'm not sure about the 'real reason'.

It's perhaps more like: some folks an Niantic wanted to make a Pokemon game, and this way they could make it financially viable?
If someone will try to overwhelm the repair capacities for integral communications, they'll be dealt with like pirates - simply sunk and be done with.
use libsodium directly, like this[1].

1. https://github.com/nathants/git-remote-aws
Technically, it's not an externality, because the company that benefits is clearly part of the transaction.

Nitpicking aside, I agree with you.
Even before LLMs, I knew they are going to launch a fine grained mapping service with all that camera and POI data. Now this one is actually much better obviously. Very few companies actually have this kind of data. Remains to be seen how they make money out of this
that means if the parents earn 300K a year, one can just quit his/her job and take the free ride?

One couple, both PhDs, when their daughter went to Harvard, the mom quit her job to qualify for the free tuition.

What about if someone has a large net asset? will the 200K still apply?
I'll still never forget the day I learned about the existence of Z-library.

I was doing a summer research term with one of my professors and he recommended a textbook so I pulled it up on Amazon only for him to shake his head and show me Z-library.

I just remember thinking "wait why didn't you tell our class about this site earlier?!"
Search is AI. Or would have been considered AI in eg the 1980s.

The goalposts of what counts as AI are constantly moving further and further away. Simple algorithms like A* once counted as part of AI.
In the US at least, "facts of the world as it is" are not generally copyrightable, though any creative process in the presentation of them may be.
For the sake of this exercise I want to hear how people would solve that harder problem.
> most people don’t plan like this.

This is a pretty naive take. It is a $85k per year cost. If you can shift some money around and avoid $85k per year, you would absolutely do that.

> you could also emancipate your 17 year old.

This is complicated. Emancipation is not a “sign a form” kind of thing. The kid would have to be living completely independently (no support from the parents) and would have to convince a judge that they need to have rights and responsibilities otherwise given to adults. “Because the parents don’t want to pay for school” isn’t really a valid reason.
Possibly? I wouldn't bet on lawyers billing any less per page of document discovery either way.
New Book about Nvidia
New book about Nvidia
The core of the concern about climate change is what it’s going to do to human society. Nobody gives a shit what the climate looked like a million years ago - complex human society reliant on large scale agriculture didn’t exist a million years ago, and that’s all we care about. We worry about droughts because they affect our crops and cause famines, we worry about heat waves because they kill our people and livestock, we worry about sea level rise because it damages our cities, we worry about hurricanes of increasing intensity because they kill people and damage our cities. We don’t give a shit if we’re in a relatively cool period in earth’s history or if the whole thing will shift in a hundred thousand years because that’s totally fucking irrelevant to what’s going to happen in the next hundred years and how we’re going to adapt our cities, crops, and cultures to it, because that’s what actually matters to us, because we’re actual living people in a complex society and we’d like to stay that way on both counts.
I would say the majority of that touches on my 2nd paragraph where I mention what Matt says regarding the CEO encouraging to go with the Frontier deal instead of JetBlue deal but shareholders disagreed. I think Matt & I both agree the CEO was proven right here & shareholders didn't listen & suffered.

I did mention a few things I don't see in there. Also doing a quick Google search I'm questioning Matt's line about the CEO saying they would not go bankrupt.

> During the antitrust trial in Boston, Spirit CEO Ted Christie repeatedly told the court that the Florida-based carrier was in serious financial trouble and continued independence would not allow the carrier to be a “relevant” competitor to U.S. majors American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Southwest Airlines and United Airlines. https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/airlines-lessors/anal...

I think that linked article also provides a much more realistic argument as to why blocking this M&A deal was the wrong decision:

> Young and the DOJ engaged in wishful thinking and approached the proposed JetBlue-Spirit merger through the prism of an outdated view of the U.S. airline market. Even if Spirit can move through the Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection process and emerge as a restructured carrier, it will look far different than the ULCC of the previous decade Young thought he was preserving.

> Spirit executives had already been talking about a “reimagination” of the model that would include premium-seating and bundled product tiers. ULCC Frontier Airlines is also moving into premium offerings, while newer entrants Avelo Airlines and Breeze Airways eschewed the no-frills concept from the start.
That's economic suicide not sacrifice, for many small businesses the asset produces the revenue. Sell the asset you may as well close the business. It is not a fair assessment of a family's means at all.

It's not equivalent to making all your income off one rental and having to sell it, but it is closer to that. If you sell it, you have no income now. But a small business also creates jobs and provides novel value to the community, so even more is lost than just a single income.
they never disclosed the scope of inter-flight maintenance.

For all we know this booster could have engines swapped out for reconditioning, or outright disposal, every launch.
Well, they'll express their disagreement in the form of a letter and then calculate what they think you should pay and how far behind you are on the usual withholdings as a result, along with penalties.
> Those are some cherry-picked numbers.

I don't disagree, but they support my point that tuition has not changed meaningfully in the past decade (and then some), which is why I asked what timeframe you were looking at.

Inflation is perhaps not a good point of reference anyways, since in 2009, inflation per CPI was actually slightly negative. Cost of borrowing is not the same as cost of goods and services or cost of labor, for reasons such as the ones you point out (changes to banking regulations, increased risk aversion, etc).

Although, I'm a little surprised that cost of borrowing would have been much higher, seeing as that was the start of the zero interest-rate policy in the US. The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate was hovering around 6-7% pre-crisis and 4-5% in the years immediately following it.
> The shift has other business model implications too. Take the observability sector. The industry still grapples with data overload, skyrocketing costs, and a critical shortage of skilled personnel. Incumbent company pricing models (think Datadog or Splunk) are wildly mismatched to customer needs, charging per GB for log management, for example, or ratcheting up costs with infrastructure size and data volume.

We have no reason to believe that AI costs won’t skyrocket long term either. It feels like the early days of streaming right now, but how long will it last?

Foundation models are pretty reasonably priced depending on the workload, but having a plurality or majority of companies all hooking up to the same two or three model APIs is gonna get really interesting when prices start to increase, because your exposure to the price increase scales with the number of times that same provider is used by your vendors, your vendor’s vendors, etc.

If Altman wakes up one day and decides to double the token price, it could be Armageddon in the SaaS space.
what he actually said: "as long as the physical error probability ε is small enough" you can build a reliable system from unreliable parts.

So it remains for you to show that AI.ε ~= QC.ε since JvN proved the case for a system made of similar parts, that is vacuum tubes, with the same error probability.

(p.s. thanks for the link)
Indians have a love/hate relationship with the British because it really is an apt comparison.

India (as in the country) literally would not exist without the British. They were right assholes (to put it mildly), but compared to the other colonial powers, actually did leave a somewhat useful legacy. And weren’t that rapacious compared to many others (cough Belgium, Spain).

As to how much, if any, that justifies anything is up for debate. But Indians would generally hold that debate in English, because it works.
I see the Mac fanboys aren't happy with my factual statement. I love Macs (won't use anything else) but I also live in reality.
Niantic pays you for the data you collect, as well. It might pay you with in-game rewards, but if you accept those rewards, this is, as you put it, "a simple, understood transaction".

The farmers you buy the vegetables from are also generally unaware of how you use them, too!

I fail to see how you're differentiating the analogy from the original example.
Originally I had it going via browser -> postmessage -> zig -> bun via named pipes and then bun -> zig via named pipe -> js via evaluate js.

I’m building https://colab.sh/ with electrobun and that rpc was pretty slow when trying to load multi MB files in the code editor.

Last week I added an encrypted socket rpc option directly between bun and browser.

Loading a 2MB file went from a few seconds to 400ms.

I made it so that in contexts where CORS allows it automatically upgrades to the socket based faster RPC.

That’s via RPC though. electrobun also exposes a custom views:// scheme in the browser context that can load files directly from specific sandboxed places in the file system. More to improve there but for a very big file you’d be better off writing it to the file system that would be much faster.
lol! I haven't pursued this area for some time, so I genuinely can't say.
> Prusa gave everyone permission to make copies of their i3 series machines, make modifications, and distribute modified versions. It’s not theft if you have been given explicit permission to make copies.

Indeed. But I guess Prusa also expected that people will buy the original such that this support this open-source mission can be sustained. This is where I personally see Prusa's fallacy of thinking.
I am counting my chickens before they hatch, but sulfur chemistries should help quite a lot. Same abundance of materials, 2x to 3x the energy density.

It's my impression that a lot of sulfur and other "advanced" chemistries are held up by operating restrictions like temperature for consumer vehicles, but industrial transport vehicles might not have such requirements because they have constant output.
Cases were happening in China around Dec ‘19 and I was worried. Then a case in the US followed by “no reason to worry”. Then it spiraled.
Cruel Efficiency
That's exactly what I mean, that's why I'm asking what GP meant.
I see apple as like LVMH, but for phones. It has a minority of overall sales, but a majority of the “luxury” part of the market. This gives them influence over the whole market, but not a real monopoly.
You're not getting your BM degree, not with that attitude.
> There's the actual international law (and the UN) and there's the US-led rules-based international order (ie, what the US wants basically).

Those are the same 'order', the same thing. The UN and international law are unquestionable, essential parts of the international order.

> often times the US (and Israel or a couple of other minor countries) vote against or simply flout whatever the rest of the UN wants.

Agreed, as I discussed in the GP: the US and its partners often violate those rules and let themselves off the hook, as status quo powers tend to do. It doesn't excuse it at all, but that's not inconsistent with the rules-based order.

Also, with a veto on UN Security Council decisions, if the US votes against something then it's not law.
Simon is an impressive individual, but in this instance, you're praising the messenger and not the source.

> Code from this PR [1] by David Laban.

That leverages the features of uv run with embedding script dependencies [2].

[1] https://github.com/alsuren/sixdofone/pull/8
[2] https://docs.astral.sh/uv/concepts/projects/run/#running-scr...
Bernardo Kastrup – Refuting Materialism: full lecture [video]
OpenNext does model [0] incremental static regeneration, but beyond that I actually don't know, or at least don't recall. OpenNext doesn't do per-route lambdas like vercel does, so it's not like you get any behavior differences there.

I _think_ you can get scale to zero on Lambda by deploying a docker container, too.

[0] https://opennext.js.org/aws/v2/advanced/architecture
“If you're not paying for the product, you are the product”

(I realize you can pay, but are not required to)
Australia launches 'landmark' bill to ban social media for children under 16
How to Run Databases on Kubernetes: An 8-Step Guide