skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My first thought is using your union representative to amplify your voice. Presumably the union doesn't want to be associated with, or known to be representing, racists so it's in their best interests to denounce these types of statements.
> no consensus that Jesus is divine, or about the nature of the divinity ascribed to him, even after the declaration in 325 of the Nicene Creed

Which shouldn’t be surprising, because by 325 CE (and really, by 100 CE) Christianity had been around long enough for groups to take it in all kinds of directions, just like some Asian or African peoples have created new religions that are ostensibly Christian but preserve little of the Christianity originally introduced by colonial powers. In my own academic field, I deal a lot with third-century Manichaeism, where it is obvious how popular preachers could repurpose existing monotheistic religions into something that bore little resemblance to them.

> This NPR interview with a former Evangelical…

You really ought to state plainly in your post that this is Bart Ehrman. While he is a prominent scholar, even researchers of early Christianity who are not themselves Christians take issue with some of his claims.
Okay, never mind. I managed to reproduce the situation from your description. That's a tough one, but I will try to do something about it.
Oh my god , I had written the exact same comment when seeing this for the first time , and then I scrolled to see your comment. Xd , definitely felt a bit of deja vu.

Yeh I am genuinely interested in this project. but I don't think I have the technical prowess to manage it , but I am going to try but I hope that others could somehow create it as well (since I have created nothing open source which people care about)
The value in AI podcasts at the moment isn't in replacing human content, but in filling the niches that human content just doesn't cover. Doesn't matter if it's not the best podcast ever, when it's literally the only podcast on this planet discussing the topic you want to listen too.
> Think about small improvements that can move the team

Which team? My team of 5 people or the entire project of several hundred? Focusing on the small teams finds a lot of local maximums that are very bad for the entire project. Many of the small changes small teams want to make are not possible because they would impact some of those several hundred other developers. Often small pain for us is much better than the pain our change would force on those others.
The people that designed jumbo jets were people that went to Washington State University and UDub in the 60s. John Aaron saved Apollo 12 and 13 with a degree from Southwestern Oklahoma State. These are not people that were in “gifted programs” and they don’t fit what you perceive to be “gifted” (aka - able to get into one of 10 elite undergrad schools).
I bet this will go viral on X…
this right here. i hate this move to a cashless society and hate getting stink-eyed because i buy something with a $20 bill. these seizures all but codify this.
$43,000/0.00016 = $268,750,000 I doubt Apple sells that much a day in Brazil.
The difficulty of Making illegal state unrepresentable depends entirely on the domain you're working on. And whether discarding the occasional invalid transaction is viable.

If you're writing a CMS/wiki software, it's gonna be pretty straightforward to do.

If you're working with transactions, trades, contracts etc, it's not.
Don’t have an android app yet but there’s a waitlist here - https://getwaitlist.com/waitlist/11378

A lot of power users use it to organize their digital life in one place (to-dos, reminders, schedules) and then they use the social integrations (slack, email, sms) to move the information around.
40-60% - that's a pretty large p-value and reasonable proxy for thumbs and sense.
Show HN: InsyteSage – AI data analysis from plain English
I built InsyteSage (https://insytesage.ai) to solve a common problem I faced: business teams waiting on data analysts for every analysis request, and non-analysts struggling to start meaningful data exploration.

How it works:
- Upload data (or use provided public datasets like NSW property sales)
- Describe your columns
- Ask your business question in plain English (e.g. "compare user engagement in different regions")
- Get a structured analysis plan with visualizations and statistical insights
- Refine analysis through natural language prompts

Technical details:
- Uses LLMs to understand business context and generate analysis plans
- Implements statistical methods for hypothesis testing
- Generates visualizations based on data characteristics
- Built with Python/FastAPI, supabase backend, React frontend

You can try it immediately with public datasets. Just create an account for free and create an analysis using any of the public datasets.

Looking for feedback especially on:
1. Analysis quality and relevance
2. Natural language interaction
3. Types of analyses you'd want automated

This is my first substantial project after years of building data pipelines and analytics systems. Built it because I believe data analysis should be more accessible to business teams.
There is a type of person I don't bother engaging. The type of person who has no qualms spending a lot of time talking, but is less interested in sharing the facts that inform their worldview. I hope you aren't one of those people and I hope even more strongly you're not content with being that type of person.
He plead to attempted money laundering or something like that
Are you not asking two questions?

Credence is a good thing because others can understand websay what we do and do what we say.

This is high value! Expectations can be set and met with confidence. So much depends on that being solid!

Your other question, "Is the expectation the US will defend Europe a good thing?"

Frankly deserves and would be a good discussion I would read with interest.
Show HN: Intelligent proxy for human-in-the-loop agents written in Rust
I ... don't think there's a time limit on TikToks unless you mean that 60 minutes is a time limit. Are you thinking of Vine?
The result to me looked more like a Zoom background replacement rather than a weather chromakey. That's what really looked bad to me. Even the full studio chromakey looks much better where the anchors are at a desk in front of a color vs a full studio.
You might be surprised to learn that this is how education funding already works. Government isn't completely idiotic.

What you are ignoring is that educational spending imbalance comes from private voluntary educational spending (enrichment programs, camps, PTA), not public mandatory spending.
You brought your own croutons and pan to a fancy restaurant?? Bold.
This will probably just follow their existing precedent in other countries like South Korea and Denmark (the latter limited to dating apps?).

In those regions it’s just a reduction of 3% that covers the payment processing.

So it’ll give more choice but not enough to drive a lot of adoption, since that’s the same or below what other payment processors take as well.
I suspect that won't be an issue anymore, as it is no longer possible to skip grades in public schools in many states.

And hopefully private schools would prevent "bullying hell" if they want all those tuition $$$.
I'm saying it's a stupid rule on a Q&A site for software engineers. Choosing the right framework given objectives and constraints is sometimes 80% of the job.
Not all podcasts are Joe Rogan
No, I'm talking about regular kids who grow up in hard circumstances that just need an opportunity for a better life.

This can mean a jump from working class to middle class and nothing more. That is absolutely driving society forward.

Not offering a means out of "the shit" for these kids is a way to hold them down into the circumstances they were born into and nothing more.

Zero kids I'm thinking of who went through these programs went to Yale or any other ivy. Most have great lives 20 years later, off the backs of that early opportunity for achievement.
Interesting article but gets at least one thing wrong. Not all models are trained on Nvidia chips. https://blog.google/technology/ai/google-gemini-ai/
You also seem to be the sole arbiter of what constitutes worthy activities.
The main reason im not concerned about AI-based entertainment is the same reason I watch human chess players. It's not only about technical capabilities. I can't explain fully why though..
We should just accept the euphemism treadmill is an iron law of the universe and every 10 years, we come up with a new term for insiders as the old term gets degraded.

The problem now is people use "agile" to mean anything from the 2001 agile manifesto meaning of the term to the 2024 F500 meaning and that's too long a span of time so the word has lost all communicative value. You can either engage in a fool's errand trying to drag the word back to the original meaning or accepting reality and letting people have it and come up with some new term like "katana development" or some bullshit that means essentially the same thing.

The "Observability" crew are good at this, I feel like every 10 years, there's a new coat of paint on essentially the same basic SRE concepts. Like how we went from Oriental to Asian American to AAPI, the mental burden of keeping up with these language changes serves as a basic shibboleth to who is paying attention enough to developments in the field.
Can I use the same code to do the opposite. i.e. Remove background music then add my own audio as a background? Also does it matter who is speaking. Does it support new speakers joining in suddenly?
I regularly watch 10 minute or longer TikToks and I'm sure you've turned off a YouTube video in the first 10 seconds.
The curious case of the blocked window [video]
But some are better than others. The NIH is currently running a study (N=36, expected to complete in 2025) on ultra-processed foods where the participants are sequested as inpatients at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center's research facility and strictly monitored 24/7. They can't leave without a chaperone that ensures they're not cheating.
They've done prior studies such as this one [2] (N=20) in 2019. In these studies, they switch the person's diet halfway through, in order to see if the effect is real. The participants were allowed to eat as much as they wanted, but the diets had the same amount of calories total, and the same calorie density. The results are striking; participants eating ultra-processed foods consumed more calories and gained weight while the other group lost weight.
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/30/well/eat/ultraprocessed-f...
[2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31105044/
> No, customers care about the safety of their vehicles.

People can (and do) care about both safety and inconvenience, to varying degrees. The exact degree depends on the level of safety risk and the level of inconvenience.

Your odd claim that people don't care about inconvenience is unsupported by data or just plain common sense.

I see you didn't even try to refute that the article will predictably mislead the average reader (classic "lie without lying") about the level of inconvenience for owners.
ah, a motte and bailey lunch invitation, "would ever be worth listening to", so "if you can find [now]", then I'll eat my hat
> Second generation immigrant children from first generation parents sounds like the American Dream working as-intended to me!

If your definition of the American dream is the tiny fraction of poor Asian kids that get into Stanford you have a screwed up definition of the American dream, which is built on people that go to Cal State LA and never had G&T programs.

> This can simply mean being a functional member of society that participates within their community.

People that work in factories and retail are also functional members of society and your sentence does not seem to imply that when you drew a contrast there.
Hard to carry that around in your pocket when on a job.
Can it split windows too and have some simple way to select the content?
that makes sense - and have wondered a lot even more generally about the price of software and what makes a hard problem hard. Like Amjad from Replit said on a podcast recently "can anyone build 'the next salesforce' in a world where anyone can build their own salesforce with coding agents and serverless infra"

I think in building this some of the things that folks decided they don't want to deal with is like, the state machine for escalations/routing/timeouts, and infrastructure to catch inbound emails and turn them into webhooks, or stitch a single agent's context window with multiple open slack threads, but you're right, that can all be solved by a software engineer with enough time and interest in solving the problem.

I will need to clear up the pricing page as it sounds like I didn't do a good job (great feedback thank you!) - it's basically $20/200 credits, and you can pay-as-you-go, and re-up for more whenever you want. We are early and delivering value is more important to me than extracting every dollar, especially out of a fellow founder who's early. If you geniunely find this useful, I would definitely chat and collaborate/partner to figure out something you think is fair, where you're getting value and you get to focus on your core competency. feel free to email me dexter at humanlayer dot dev
"Natural Flavor" is an ultra-processed ingredient.
Below the API
Uber Engineering: Introducing the Prompt Engineering Toolkit
Obvious misspelling in HN title not in The Tweet, but The Tweet has a great phrase:

> launching, growing, and raisin money
How on earth is that violated by error?

error is implemented by types all over the standard library and beyond and consumed by functions that wrap errors in the errors package. It's exactly an example of what you claim is violated.

Even more obviously your link isn't talking about functions but packages. There are some violations out there but generally when included packages define interfaces they are ones that get consumed like in io or it's dissolution.
My fast rule is to only eat food that’s been around for 1000 years or so.
> yes it's noise because whenever read a codebase for the first time you are never interested on the the error edge case.

maybe this has something to do with how bug-prone it usually is for a new hire to modify a codebase for the first time in most orgs

you could also just do things fail-fast style and panic everywhere if you REALLY wanted to stop inlining error conditions. or ignore error checks until some sort of guard layer that validates things.

IME you usually don't want to do either of those things, and the go approach at least encourages you to think about it closer to the site than checked exceptions (which you can more easily toss up and up and up and auto-add to signatures of callers). unchecked exceptions are arguably less-bad than "just ignore go return errors" - they'll get seen! - but terrible for a reliability/UX perspective.

optional-esque approaches are nice but just a different flavor of the same overhead IMO.
Both in that discussion, here, and in the article I can find no mention of actual rates of suspected infections from this vector. You have a doctor who thinks that this is risky behavior by putting together the microbiome of the human face, and the nature of a neonate's immune status. This is the perceived risk, but the real risk can only be revealed by studying whether or not that risk is ever realized.

This isn't just academic, the public and media have limited ability to communicate important issues, and if this is a purely (or even mostly) hypothetical risk then that limited attention should be directed to issues that take or damage more lives.
Tailor Claude's responses to your personal style
Fortnite and roblox are f2p though.
I don't know where the government gets off on using "consensual encounters" as a euphemism for 4th Amendment violations.
If I'm remembering correctly, I was using iTerm before Warp. I listened to some of the devs on the Changelog podcast and it seemed worth checking out.
At the time, iTerm was getting really heavy and slow for me and I was losing a day every few months tracking down the cause. Warp was immediately faster and prettier so I stuck with it. They're also super fast with updates and responsive on Github with issues.

I honestly don't use many of their features besides being able to ask the LLM for how to do something random in git and getting the answer without leaving the terminal. The way they organize each command+response into blocks is also cool for readability and copy/pasting.
A research result reported before, but, as usual, the New Yorker has better writers.

Is there something which shows what the tokens they use look like?
Man. I understand you are not in a good moment (given your handle). But a lot of those people who think you're a failure are not the smart ones, but the powerful ones.
Gold is only really valuable because we agreed it is; it has industrial applications (good conductor, malleable) but mostly it is priced based on its prettiness. If we were suddenly totally awash in gold, I guess the price would go down.

It is fairly dense, so maybe the best application for gold if you have lots of it in space (and not many morals) might be to threaten to drop it on people/cities/whatever.
that would be racist[2]
How to Do Scientific Research in Undergrad?
One problem of mine that seems to fall in line with this: There is a set of data that some other daily process requires. This data is only available on a well structured and difficult to quickly navigate web page and any of it can change at any time.

I wrote a small Python program using Pandas and Beautiful Soup to parse the web page and insert all the data into a table. Cron schedules it to run hourly such that you get Cron->wget->Python->database. I considered using this approach on a variety of other things such that instead of browsing the raw data I could use SQL to query a database and detect changes, trends, etc.

Of course this opens the door of easy programatic access to that data. Honestly the need for me was never great enough to go any deeper.
I agree with you, and wish this perspective had informed many of the comments nearby.

I'm commenting because my own kid went through the LAUSD highly gifted (HG) magnet program -- which is a subset of the "gifted" program -- his high school was: https://www.highlygiftedmagnet.org.

(Without belaboring the point, it's a very high-achieving bunch. Multiple Harvard, MIT, and Stanford admissions in his rather small graduating class of ~70.)

There are good things and bad things about the LAUSD HG program. One good thing is that most admissions are done just by testing. There are 2 layers of tests, one for gifted and one (later) for highly gifted. If you test 99.5%+, you can be admitted to the HG program. The tests are done relatively early (4th grade for my kid) so they aren't as easy to game, although I'm sure it is done.

Every LAUSD student gets the first test, so that's pretty egalitarian. You have to ask for the second test. That's the good part.

One thing the article discusses is the other paths to admission at some schools -- paths that are much more subject to gaming, esp. by parents. Things like outside evaluations and private testing to substitute for the LAUSD-administered test. That has been a source of controversy, rightfully IMHO, because these parents can be bulldogs. The possibility of gaming the system is the bad part.

One other thing to re-inforce in the above comment. The HG program did tend to favor "high-achieving" rather than "gifted" students. So there was a high proportion of boring grindset students, weighted towards STEM, and the result was that the actually creative types were in a minority.

My conclusion is that these programs can benefit the special needs of HG kids, but the devil is in the implementation details and the parents and status game will tend to mess it up. Also, we should have no illusions that their existence is in part a reaction to racial/social inequities, and that they tend to reproduce the problems of the outside society.
To me, unboxing videos are documentation, not entertainment. When I need to know exactly what's in a box and how it's packaged, an unboxing video is the only source of that information.
Forget catering to "gifted students". San Francisco's school district (SFUSD) wanted to take algebra out of 8th grade, simply because poor kids and POCs were failing it at disproportionate levels. Here's a relevant article: https://www.joannejacobs.com/post/algebra-for-none-fails-in-...

So the solution to bad grades in some communities was to take away the opportunity for ALL communities.

Thankfully, a vocal group of people raised a stink about it and even put it on the ballot. The uproar caused the school to backtrack and bring Algebra back in 8th grade starting this year.

This kind of idiotic "social engineering" that the SFUSD is doing is killing the public schools. Parents who can afford to spend the $50K/year on private schooling are taking their kids out of SFUSD and the district is losing funding.

Democrats often say that the Republicans would like to kill public education. But the Democrats are doing a great job of it themselves! Case in point: my friend's kid goes to an SFUSD Middle School. Their 5thgrade class has no math teacher! Math is taught via Zoom and "self-paced learning". SMFH...
This article says something that seems very false to me once you step outside of the developer sphere:

> Most LLM users seem willing to change from Chat-GPT to Claude, for example.

Talk to people who aren't engineers and it's all ChatGPT. Many don't even know about the concept of an LLM or a provider, just literally "ChatGPT". The South Park episode where they parody this stuff? They call it ChatGPT. The stuff students use every year to help with homework? ChatGPT. The website that "chat.com" redirects to? ChatGPT. And cai has cornered to market on horny/lonely male teens.

The moat here is the broader consciousness that a very very large population of people have adopted. Articles like this take something technical -- the cost of switching over to an LLM, which is cheap -- as an assumption that it will happen, without taking into account just how difficult it is to change social forces.

This doesn't mean ChatGPT will forever be what people use. Maybe it will fail spectacularly in a year. But it's OpenAI's game to lose here, not the other way around.
There are quite a few open source wg clients out there, maybe you can get some ideas from those. Defguard, netbird come to mind.

I just want to avoid all that custom client stuff.

I don't have a solution, but I was experimenting on having a unique network url that would show different content depending if you're hitting it via the wireguard connection or not. Pretty basic stuff, just firewall rules and nginx proxying. Add the (hub) endpoint to client's AllowedIPs and route traffic on the hub depending on the networ interface and port the traffic is coming from.

So the client would connect to the wg network and open up the network page (eg. home.rudasn.wirehub.org).

If the connection is established, they would see a welcome message or whatever (if they need to update their config maybe a link to get their new one).

If the connection is not via the wg tunnel, they would see a message to first connect to the wireguard vpn. And if it's their first time, directions on how to install the official client and get their config from their admin (via wirehub.org or whatnot).

It's nice to have that automated via a custom client, but I don't think it's such a huge issue - if you would only update configs for client devices sporadically and have the server peers polling for updates every x seconds.

The downside of custom client apps is another security layer to consider, which nobody has the time for.