skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not super worried from a European perspective, it might even spur on some cooperation in our own union, which I support.

Just a bit nervous for Ukraine... I wish Europe could step up on that front but we just don't have the capacity for it. Which is entirely our own fault, Trump is right to call us out on our reliance on the US. It's our continent we should be the one spearheading this.

Hopefully that will change in the near future. But that doesn't help Ukraine now.

The democrats need to do some serious introspection on their policies and priorities. And perhaps just return to running a white male as candidate...

Oh well at least it's a very clear victory, so no weeks or months of anxiety over the results.
>For literally anyone sane, any of those reasons individually would be totally disqualifying in a candidate

Sorry, but this is not how it works.

People have fear, prejudice and many other things that worry them. Their fear may or may not be baseless but it is there and if you are sane and more or less logical you have to take it into account.

When people fear or do not understand something they tend to turn to someone who offers them a solution.

Some times it's a doctor, some times it's a drug dealer. Why? Well, many reasons (I'll excuse myself and won't start listing those because you can write a few books about each of them)

You want people to stop turning to mafia\drug dealers or some kind of charlatans for help? You have to do something about their fears.

This is sane and logical and any therapist will tell you something similar.

Yes, it might be hard to accept, but it is quite possible you have to fix this shit to be able to fix the "their rights are literally being stripped away" part.

edit: misprints
> Most divorces are initiated by women.

No having non-fault divorce doesn't stop divorces if you have an actual reason for it, a "fault" that caused the divorce if you will: Domestic abuse, cheating, abandonment, etc. Considering that men often lose the most in a divorce but don't initiate divorces indicates that women have a privilege here.

Marriage rates aren't only decreasing because of anti-social people: many men are starting to view marriage as a legal institution which benefits women exclusively - allowing them to extract resources from a man with the backing of the state and very little effort.

> Most victims of domestic violence are women.

Most reported victims of domestic violence are women. If you take into account unreported domestic violence, emotional abuse, and non-deadly domestic violence men are actually ahead of women in this particular stage of the oppression olympics.

Maybe if you could share some of that empathy with the men affected by these laws you'd see why they get pushed through, and why women also support them.
As someone living in WI who got barraged with ads from both sides, that wasn't the messaging anyone saw AFAICT. The biggest issue on people's minds was the economy. Dem messaging on economic policy was nonexistent. Women's healthcare isn't an issue that resonates with young (read: unmarried) men. It should, but it doesn't. There could have been some "look out for your wife" messaging, but there wasn't.

There's a lot of people in the comments parroting whatever narrative they cooked up for 2016, but the reality is that both candidates' approaches were wildly different this time around.
Sure, but invoking Hitler's language while denigrating people from other countries is pretty Nazi though.
Complete chaos. Retribution. Whatever the goon encounters. RIP USA
It feels like you're balancing two conflicting notions here:

1. Stop calling average people ignorant.

2. Average people are misogynistic.
70% of Republicans think Trump was the real winner of the 2020 election and that's hardly the only misinformation they have. It's hard to imagine that that wasn't a huge factor in the election.
You forgot trade war against Europe and China. Also, if economists and investors are right, massive inflation. I also personally predict total war with Iran, directly or indirectly.
It implies that either they themselves are even more reprehensible and irredeemable, or the majority of US voters are so morally bankrupt that they prefer reprehensible and irredeemable candidates. The latter is probably true, but why would they say that and then continue to run for elections? Why do they want the approval of morally bankrupt people who prefer reprehensible candidates?

Another option is that voters are just very stupid and fail to see that which is "obvious", repeatedly, despite billions spent on trying to make them "see". Or perhaps their claims are not actually "obvious", and they ought to be... kinder to the other side.
Governors can be killed by executive order

This is a bald faced lie. Stop talking rubbish.
Yes. The downside is the wealth tax, and it can also be very difficult to socially integrate into a country where English is not the first language. (I can learn Dutch of course, but it would take many years.)
Even the C89 draft[1] says passing null should do nothing, and as far as I can tell it's still[2] the case.

Which runtimes would this be?

[1]: http://jfxpt.com/library/c89-draft.html#4.10.3.2

[2]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/memory/free
A different bug in the article: It lists That Time I Got Reincarnated… (awfully long title) as having one, but I'm pretty sure that's just a translation of the title card:

73
00:13:32,095 --> 00:13:34,055
No... Look!

74
00:13:47,068 --> 00:13:47,600
That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime

75
00:13:47,610 --> 00:13:49,987
<b>The Scarlet Bond</b>
<b>That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime</b>

76
00:14:04,627 --> 00:14:05,992
Find him?!
To your point, the Democrats should win every election, especially against Trump. But, they can't get out of their own way. Go all the way back to when the party hosed Bernie, and now this time when they were Hiden Biden.

While the economic numbers are good, they are mainly good for people with already high economic status like existing home owners and professionals. For example, student loan forgiveness sounds great but then leaves every blue collar worker who didn't go to college wondering WTF are they doing for me? They are giving more money to people who are already ahead. When Musk says pain is coming, many of Trumps supporters are happy because they are already in pain and want to see those benefitting feel some of that pain.

Then they go and overplay their hands with social issues. I didn't see it at the time, but all of the DEI rollbacks we've been seeing over the past year or so should have been a signal. One of the middle of the road people on TV last night mentioned he had friends who tried to avoid interacting with people at work because they were afraid of saying something offensive. And these were likely center left people. I have had similar discussions with even my most progressive friends. The almost refusal to message young men is also a problem.

Most Americans want legal immigration, but the Democrats took too long to do something and then Trump was able to kill the bill last minute. It looked like the Democrats wanted to simply ignore it until they no longer could.

There are more, but I think these are some of the big Democrat self owns.
> a disciplined planned approach

But that would not be "agile"! Programming is mostly fashion-driven and any overlap with actual engineering is completely random.
But how Obama and Biden got elected then?
XP x64 was a lovely desktop, and was essentially 2k3 desktop. Last Windows system I enjoyed using.
But what about all the semiconductor industry that US companies, esp now with AI advancement rely on so heavily?
Agree. American's hate out groups and want to punish them. This just shows who people really are.
They'll write several angry comments to social media, then retire to the couch after a job well done.
Common ground. The whole democratic apparatus of the United States might get severely hollowed out for the foreseeable future, and you're talking about finding common ground.
Accomplished politician wouldnt be a compliment though would it. One of the recent issues is bureaucratic bloat caused by career politicians. In that sense she would be less appealing.
“This guy” revolutionized mathematics and logic by proving Incompleteness Theorems
This has happened before... I don't expect Dems to ever really learn this lesson
Regarding the last point:

I'm quite sure the US will see a military coup, in the event that Trump tries to ally with Russia and become enemies with NATO countries. I mean, I don't think it is possible for Trump to pull out of NATO. Worst case is he simply decides to shut off all funding.

Politicians are short term, military officers are life-long and ideological.
I'm always amazed by how many people consider it a failure of democracy for the candidate they voted for to lose.
One major difficulty with addressing republicans and “low-information” independents (there aren’t a ton of true-swing voters anyway, most are partisans who prefer not to label themselves that but vote as if they were) is that you can’t discuss issues with them. If you try, you immediately get sidelined into dealing not with disagreements on issues, but with having to try to convince them that basically their entire list of concerns is fictional.

We had an R state rep candidate come by our house. Highlighted two issues in her message to us. Both were simply not actual things. The existence of the problems were lies. WTF do you do with voters who consume media that’s made them believe those? It’s like a huge moat around even being able to talk to them about anything real, even if only to disagree about some real thing.
The polls predict chance of winning, not share of the vote.

If I predict a coin toss to be 50/50 that doesn’t mean I expect it to land on its side.
Implement Drop on a custom guard type. Boom. There you go.
I find it hard to believe that the majority of ~70,000,000 people are that stupid and/or mislead, the only other option is that the majority actually want what is now coming and I do not feel obliged to refrain from passing judgement on that. My feelings on brexit, which far more directly affects myself, are similar.

People who were naive enough to be misled do undoubtably exist (I know a couple of otherwise intelligent people who massively regret the brexit thing) but I don't think they are the majority.
Ok, well... that's not really an argument, is it?

It actually is, though.

Sure, it didn’t work—probably because enough people weren’t convinced that it was true enough (and also because they didn’t care)—but it's not unreasonable to think that such an argument should have been enough.
> fascists have come to power in the past, or they are just into fascism and prefer that kind of thing.

This, right here, has been the focal point of Dem supporters everywhere - doubling down on the name-calling.

I seriously doubt that more than half the voters are homophobic, misogynistic fascists, but calling them that only stops them from engaging, it doesn't magically cause them to rethink their position and switch their vote.
Given that Trump's economic policies are primarily the cause of inflation in the US, not sure what your point is. He printed and gave away 8 trillion dollars when combined with his tax cuts for the wealthy and people wonder why the cost of everything went up. Corporations across the planet were the beneficiaries of corporate welfare as governments printed money to battle COVID, and then they pocketed the profits and told their employees that they couldn't afford to give them raises.
Doesn't sounds like they're unaffordable to working class people at all then. They're affordable in the UK and working class Americans are richer than working class Brits.
I wouldn't be so sure about the fascist agenda in eu given some recent results of some parties throughout the union
it's actually really interesting, Trump already modified his rhetoric. In the rallies in the last week and in his acceptance speech he has suddenly talked about how they want immigrants to come in legally - even went out of his way to talk about "geninuses" in the acceptance speech. Pretty clear here that people like Musk have been heavily exerting influence to shape his viewpoint towards favouring immigration that allows high skilled workers in.
Sounds affordable.
But it isn't wrong, is it? Democracy elected Hitler, Hitler ended democracy in Germany. I'm not saying that is going to happen here, but your flippant comeback to a valid point is not a rebuttal.
- Anti abortion law possibly being implemented on a federal level

Curious what do you base that on?
I think they would have gone for updating the number of a Representatives. But they didn’t even try to do such things. Obama kept trying the make a deal with Republicans and acted like it was the 1970s. In the end he saw what his efforts were worth when Republicans refused to even vote for his Supreme Court nominee.
That's true, lacking confidence is less of a failure than confidently getting it wrong. But they weren't actually saying "we don't know". They were predicting a split election. Do pollsters even have a way to report that they lack enough confidence to give a prediction? I rarely see CIs on reported poll results so presumably they'd have to just refuse to publish any prediction at all, which clearly, they weren't doing.

Nate Silver has recently written about the clear problems in polling, and in particular the herd-like way they were reporting implausible numbers:

https://www.natesilver.net/p/theres-more-herding-in-swing-st...
WebKit has mostly splut from Blink. Really as long as you aren't using a repackaged Chromium you aren't getting all of Google's harmful features by default and are resisting the monoculture.

Safari definitely isn't the best option to diversify into (Apple shares lots of Google's harmful ideas such as their own version of Web Environment Integrity) but I consider it a significant step up from Chrome.
I think there are also a lot of single issue voters who don’t think about the ethics of the candidate or their world view.

How many evangelical Christians just voted for an adulterer and convicted criminal because he’s not pro choice?
If Hamas had not attacked Israel, trump probably would have lost. Plenty of people just didn't go out to vote this time, abstaining because they only care that Biden and Harris support Israel. Talk about cutting off their nose to spite their face.
I can't understand. The orange goon can't complete a sentence, hates everything, crimes everything, is basically a 300# toddler... A literal toddler would be 99% less bad. If given the choice between Hitler and Trump ... at least you know what Hitler thinks. Trump will change his mind for an extra ketchup.
If the US drops support of Ukraine Putin might try to take Kyjiw again.
Ah, thanks! My blocker was that I thought contraposition wasn't valid at all in intuitionistic logic, but actually the one direction still holds, i.e "(P -> Q) -> (not Q -> not P)" is a tautology. In the other direction you get "(not Q -> not P) -> (P -> not not Q)" instead which is basically what you said in the first place =)
> Tried to Google it but all I find is a bunch of American news website like CNN and website like https://www.voterstudygroup.org/publication/the-five-types-t...

> I'm trying to look beyond the propaganda, any idea if there has been scientific studies or anything remotely credible ?

Exactly, they "propaganded" so hard that they created a narrative that they are the definitive winners. So you bought into their propaganda and now you are surprised. The reality is that the democrats are not that good and the people voted.
I didn’t get a single text.

I guess I’m doing something right. I hate spam texts.
That money and power doesn’t seem to be willing to move towards centrists policies. And there is a lot of power in the president, considering how unstable the world is the most likely scenario now is further consolidation of that power. And Russia or Israel are good examples, if anyone wants to see what happens after the power gets consolidated.
Nepotism? Like execs from different divisions fighting each other?

To me it seems they just want to keep their lock-in monopoly because they own x86. Very rational albeit stupid, but of course the people who took those decisions are long gone from the company, many are probably retired with their short-term focused bonuses.
There is no such thing as "whataboutism". It's correct to point out typical western hypocrisy and they defend themselves with invented words like "whataboutism".
Actually that statement shows exactly the political and societal problems there is today in the US. If people can’t even talk together and even get insulted it’s going to go even worst.
All Nordic countries, Switzerland and probably Austria.

Same goes for Taiwan and Israel.

Germany does not at the moment but can reintroduce it at a moments notice, and also they are taking steps to encouraging voluntary conscription like service.

Probably more 1st world nations, these were just the ones from the top of my head.
How is ideological not wanting some level ethnic cleansing?
I mean ... if you support that guy. It's accurate.
That's true, although pre-linking means the bad old days of apps spending most of their time in the dynamic linker during startup are mostly behind us even when a program uses a reasonable number of libraries.
Did Harris run on social activism? I didn’t get that from the campaign’s messaging. Not Biden’s, either.
That's interesting, I have never needed to do that. My Pixels have always just charged even if the lid is closed, on Intel and Apple Silicon machines. I like to travel light so I often use my laptop as a battery bank instead of carrying a seperate one.
I've never understood this argument. When performing scientific studies, there is a sample size of n = x hundred/thousand, and we then generalise the result across the entire population. Having 48% of the population participate in this "study" is likely to be very indicative of the likely voting choice for the remainder of the population, right? You really think that the proportion of votes for each party for those people that haven't voted would be any significant difference from those that did?
If free(NULL) doesn't work it's not the C programming language but something else
You’re missing a lot. War is not good and signing peace deals is not a bad thing.

Dems lost this election because they’ve become the party of warmongerers. You need to understand that played a big role.
Populism is just democracy taking the reigns back from the entrenched political establishment. There is nothing democratic about a social class of bureaucrats gatekeeping all political offices.
If anything, it seems to me that populism is necessary to overcome the local minimum that the political landscape settles in from time to time.
Not so much with the latest ARM windows laptops
Did Biden start or continue any?

The fueling of war in Ukraine and Middle East (Israel vs other countries) is already as bad as it gets.
Doesn’t larger conversations also consume more therefore hitting the usage limit faster?
So you're saying "be nice to people different from you, otherwise you're a scum" is too unacceptable for half of the USA? Not anything to be proud of.
All models are wrong. Some models are useful.

That pool was apparently more the former than the later.
You know that Hitler was literally voted into power, right?

I am NOT saying Trump is literally Hitler, but the idea that democratic vote can't have un-democratic outcome in the long run is simply false.
It can, and history showed us that more then once
There is no left either. At least in any meaningful definition of the term. Maybe you could say there always is a 'more left' party. But that is not very usefull.
If Ukraine falls then the Baltics will be next - I can see Poland, France and the UK attempting to help but I suspect this would ultimately fail leading to the breakup of NATO. EU either breaks up or becomes much stronger...
> These people have no shame and need to be shamed. It is the key emotion that leads to change and motivates to action.

> these people who would otherwise be ostracized by the community due to their antisocial behaviours have been normalized.

The Internet (or global communication in general) does indeed mean shame won't work, because people can just ignore you and go find people who support them - whether that's Trump, Musk, or some randoms on the Internet is irrelevant.

So let's double down on the shame thing, which has worked out so well lately?

> The only thing that can drive a change is hope and basic human decency, ethics and morality.

I think the crux of many social issues is that people have different ideas about what 'basic human decency, ethics and morality' even mean.
>pull out of Kursk

This is happening any week now with or without Trump.
Aha thank you! I really appreciate your feedback here. It's a bit more expensive here, just over 200 per injection but that sounds about right then. I will see about getting the 1 or 2 then!
The problem is that it doesn't stick and people see it as desperate.

Trump was very favorable to Israel and has a Jewish daughter. Not typical fascist behavior.

Debbie Dingell said Trump will build internment camps and put her in one. Were were the internment camps in Trump's first term?
It skews techno-libertarian, which is more right than left. Always has done, at least as long as I’ve been here. Makes sense considering the audience.
Us is not involved with boots on the ground. Now, try to imagine what you just said, but shift it to your country being invaded and imagine being told you're weird because you want soldiers to defend your motherland rather than giving away land
Who said anything about iPhones? Last time a president spoke about it was Obama and he said those jobs are never coming back.
Most men care. We have wives, mothers, daughters, friends. But it becomes very hard to vote for a party (mind you, I'm not American, but this is showing up everywhere) that airs too many radical sentiments that men are shit and useless. You lose your support. You can't build a majority that way. Keep the sensible people in the middle in the loop.
accelerationism would be launching yourself into the unknown and not committing to a particular political ideology except the continuous development of capitalism. This is simply working with the concrete situation: a Trump presidency, which clearly opens up more opportunities for radical action then a Harris presidency, since Trump will be too busy completely destroying the economy and the FBI, CIA, and NSA, the judiciary and the legal system more broadly, to be even capable of fighting back against resistance or even stopping the conditions for a popular foment. Or, maybe I'm wrong, who knows. But at least now we'll get to know.
I think it would have been better if they didn't hide Biden's mental deterioration and let the primary process pick out a better candidate. There isn't a single county that she outperformed Biden from 2020.
Fascist has become an overused word by the left. Everyone else (the majority of the american voting population it would seem) are tired of the label and tune out anyone who accuses someone of being a fascist.
The response from the left has been to double down and accuse more people of fascism.
Trump will make a deal with Xi to give him access to the industry post-takeover.
I can't begin to speak for America, my point was about the importance of Independent voters:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/first-us-independent-turnou...
> why is bacteria life on mars but a clump of cells is not life on earth

That is conflating life (the ability is eat, shit, reproduce, and the potential to late become sentient) with actual sentient life, which is not correct.

Also, no one is planning to ban antibiotics because bacteria is considered life so we can't do anything to save the host by killing it.