skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Exactly their point - I/they don't want the US to get directly involved in those situations. It would make it worse. The US doesn't need to be getting into wars, especially not with nuclear superpowers.

The supreme court balance is the same as it was when he was president, Republicans had the majority in the House from the beginning of Trump’s presidency in January 2017 until the 2018 midterm elections, when the Democrats won control of the House, and Republicans had the majority in the Senate for the entirety of Trump’s presidency.

literally nothing is different this time that's going to let him round up people into camps and turn himself into god-emperor. if he was interested in abusing power in completely new ways he would have pardoned himself before he left office.
“Inflation” doesn’t mean anything by itself. It is a shorthand for either price inflation or monetary inflation. Or inflating a balloon. Context is needed.
There are other ways around without making the standard impossible to get right. Great, we have a standard that can cope with any alphabet... oh pitty that is impossible to write programs that use it correctly.
Yeah I find it funny when people equate "legal" to "normal" or "acceptable". The prohibition is one such large example.
How likely do you think either of those things are? 2% chance? 20% chance?

I think hes too old to have to worry about that. And I don't think the republicans would try to weekend at Bernie's him after hes gone too far.

I also think its more likely someone succeeds at assassinating him during his term than he tries to overstay his welcome.
Yes, if your thread model includes the provider of your operating system, then you cannot win. It's really that simple. You fundamentally need to trust your operating system because it can just lie to you
Seems like lot of these would be taken care by normalization though? Pre-composed characters are bit of a mess.

I do feel it is a error that unit/math symbols get changed, imho they should stay as-is through case conversions.
The messaging that really gets through to people who can't understand that is naked, blatant lies. It worked with Brexit, and it worked yesterday.
> us poor conscious beings who find joy in being alive and actually have the capacity to marvel, because it is marvellous that we can, and we should.

> And I care that it is us who inhabits the earth, and not slugs.

That's not mutually exclusive with the comment you were replying to.

I agree with both of your comments except for your opinion that the first comment is "edgy cynism" and "juvenile".
Taking AI Welfare Seriously
Even if you achieved perfect compliance with law-abiding organizations, that does nothing to protect you against any individual organization which does not abide by local laws.

Consider any hacker from a non-extraditing rogue state.

Consider any nation state actor or well-equipped NGO. They are more motivated to manipulate you than Starbucks.

Consider the slavish, morbid conditions faced by foreign workers who manufacture your shoes and mine your lithium. All of your favorite large companies look the other way while continuing to employ such labor today, and have a long history of partnering with the US government to overthrow legitimate foreign democratic regimes in order maintain economic control. Why would these companies have better ethics regarding AI-generated output?

And consider the US government, whose own intelligence agencies are no longer forbidden from employing domestic propaganda, and whom will certainly get internal permission to circumnavigate any such laws, while still exploiting them to their benefit.
It does, but that doesn't seem to be the argument the commenter upthread was making.
Aide seems to have a good open source license (Cursor is proprietary)
This is awesome.

I think another audience for this is stock market traders and analysts who usually have Bloomberg and other channels up for watching market news.
I think a gun ban in the US is going to require a constitutional amendment to repeal the 2nd. Anything else is, at best, temporary.
> I would love someone with more knowledge to fully explore what a similar sized space station could achieve compared to the arduous task of going down martian gravity well that has half the solar energy and on top of that a night cycle which halves your solar output again.

Issues:

First, the solar energy at the surface is much the same as it is in orbit, because of Mars' very thin atmosphere -- unless a dust storm kicks in. This means there's no justification to use orbital solar with the attendant high capital costs and conversion losses.

Second, being able to live below the surface in any of the existing lava tubes as protection against high surface radiation levels and wide temperature extremes, thus eliminating all the complexities of an orbital presence, makes the orbital option a non-starter.

Third, an orbital presence would require generating artificial gravity to prevent known and serious health issues, less true for a surface colony (Mars' surface gravity is 38% that of Earth).

Fourth, a carefully chosen lava tube site would have much better control over environmental temperatures than a surface or orbital colony. Remember that Mars surface temperatures regularly drop to -100F overnight. Temperature extremes would also be an issue in a lava tube, but with less severity if the site were carefully chosen.

I think a Mars colonization project at scale will choose a surface colony over an orbital presence on multiple grounds.

> I just dont see any scenario where a mars base would outperform a space station above mars/earth/moon/lagrange point with the ability to recover asteroids of a few metric tons.

If the mission is to collect or mine asteroids, that would change everything. All the above assumes some other purpose -- for example, Mars surface mining.
That would be a hilarious (and confusing) bumper sticker. When other parents say “my son is an honour student” you can smugly reply “yeah, but does he have code circling Jupiter?”

Congratulations, by the way. I’m being (trying to be) funny but I genuinely think that is cool and a reason to be proud.
Big mistake, like please [YouTube] [video]
No. For both France and Canada it’s hollowed out the middle, and both are facing upcoming elections between hard right and hard left as a result
You don't need a degree to get working visa in the Netherlands (source: I don't have a degree). You can even use Dutch-US treaty to basically hire yourself.
Thanks for the question! Our example tasks are drawn from real work we do at PlantingSpace, but they don’t often have a solution that can be succinctly presented. We showcase the tasks to give a clearer sense of the problems we’re tackling, to help you assess whether the job opening aligns with your interests. If you’d like to learn more, we’d encourage you to apply using the links in our post!
> How is this situation any different?

They asked you not to put their competitors' stuff in 'their' fridge. They didn't say that you weren't allowed to buy competitors' stuff without their permission, or require you to inform them if competitors even _talked_ to you.

Like, whether Coca Cola should be allowed do that is another question, but it _is_ a very different thing, and certainly a far less aggressive thing.

For what it's worth, though, both the FTC and the EC have repeatedly investigated Coca Cola over various anti-trust issues, including around how they deal with distributors.
My point wasn't that the term is used this way, its that the definition of inflation has always been an increase in money supply. The common use of the term to mean a change in prices is a useless definition.

Its extremely common to hear "inflation" used to describe price changes, but the number is then used in isolation. Prices change for countless reasons and without detailed context related to supply/demand, strength of the dollar, etc you have NP idea why prices changed. Maybe we printed trillions and prices went up because the supply of money went up
Maybe prices increased because demand is outpacing supply. The response to those situations and economic sentiment should be wildly different, but the inflation number may be exactly the same.
This is an interesting statement. To follow it, if the problem is the electorate, how do you think you fix that if the electorate is the one who gets to choose.

Do you think it would be better if we used some other system than democracy, so that the electorate don't get a say?
It seems like it has the necessary context and is without any sort of "misrepresentation".

Your reply explains the "You need to get out and vote" part, but it doesn't explain the "and if everything goes well, maybe you won't need to vote again" part. What context do you believe makes the 2nd part alright?
That's not DNSSEC shade; it was a big story at the time. They eventually managed to rotate the keys but had to delay it, I think by more than a year?
they will purge the token hires to show a return to "normalcy" and thats it. Young grassroot talents will be ignored or marginalized as always. DNC is such a small club, even Gavin Newsom, the most "presentable" dem is an outsider. He left out some snarky remarks on how "the machine" works on pod save america podcast.
The Neville Chamberlain comparison has been used to involve us in every major war since WWII and literally all of them turned out to be total disasters.

It's like Charlie Brown and the football.
It's hard to say.

HEU cores can go to a high burnup in a fast reactor (and leave very little actinide behind) but the burnup is limited because U235 depletion will drop reactivity. If you are breeding new fuel that reduces the reactivity drop.

Modern FBR cores can get maybe 30% burnup of fertile material without reprocessing. Rather than the low-latency reprocessing cycles that people thought about 1950-1970 martians might not think of reprocessing for 20 years or so.

If they really need to ship 1000+ Starship sized reactors they are going to have a different attitude about reliability (e.g. a 5% failure rate that don't make a mess is no problem)

I could be wrong but I think space colonists would be fanatical about a circular economy. If they had 1.5 million people on the ground they could not count on getting a new reactor for every citizen every 25 years. I've done some modelling of an asteroid colony where I'd expect people to not waste a wisp of carbon dioxide, for instance, martians on the other hand would have no problem venting it to the atmosphere because they will source it from the atmosphere.
Great to hear the tasks sparked your interest! While we primarily hire within the CET timezone, we make accommodations for candidates whose background aligns well with the role. You’d need to be available to participate in team calls during usual CET business hours - if that works for you, we’d encourage you to apply using the links above.
From a consumer standpoint - this doesn't matter. You can't buy that future product that may exist. You can only choose whether to buy the current product or not. And right now, that product is bad.

I certainly hope the next generation is a massive bump for Intel, but we'll see if that's the case.
Having worked for the Foundation for a decade: it has nothing to do with Firefox, and it does not "own" the corporation in any practical sense of the word. It has no say over what happens on the corporate side.
What on earth do you mean? How does a physical blu-ray’s encryption keys get rotated?

Do you mean that the protection on the firmware gets refreshed with updates, but the secret it protects always stays the same?
To me, monorepo vs multi-repo is not about the code organization, but about the deployment strategy. My rule is that there should be a 1:1 relation between a repository and a release/deployment.

If you do one big monolithic deploy, one big monorepo is ideal. (Also, to be clear, this is separate from microservice vs monolithic app: your monolithic deploy can be made up of as many different applications/services/lambdas/databases as makes sense). You don't have to worry about cross-compatibility between parts of your code, because there's never a state where you can deploy something incompatible, because it all deploys at once. A single PR makes all the changes in one shot.

The other rule I have is that if you want to have individual repos with individual deployments, they must be both forward- and backwards-compatible for long enough that you never need to do a coordinated deploy (deploying two at once, where everything is broken in between). If you have to do coordinated deploys, you really have a monolith that's just masquerading as something more sophisticated, and you've given up the biggest benefits of both models (simplicity of mono, independence of multi).

Consider what happens with a monorepo with parts of it being deployed individually. You can't checkout any specific commit and mirror what's in production. You could make multiple copies of the repo, checkout a different commit on each one, then try to keep in mind which part of which commit is where -- but this is utterly confusing. If you have 5 deployments, you now have 4 copies of any given line of code on your system that are potentially wrong. It becomes very hard to not accidentally break compatibility.

TL;DR: Figure out your deployment strategy, then make your repository structure mirror that.
Open Source; giving full ownership of the data to the users; running completely locally; we want to make sure you can use Aide no matter the environment you are in.
It's totally okay if you don't want to go into a nuanced discussion. I guess I'm just bored and curious. Overall, I find your comment interesting.

> a tech bro website like hacker news

HN doesn't feel like that to me. Whenever I'm here, I have my brainstorm and science hat on. Nothing more, nothing less. To call HN a tech bro site, it seems to be a bit of an attack and not conductive towards the discussion. I guess the definition of tech bro differs. Also, being a male that doesn't care too much about its own gender, I am probably "well-suited" to not care.

In my case, I draw the line if they're also into sports (like going to a soccer match or something). Probably others don't. But that's why I have a bit of an issue with words like "tech bros". Like, do tech bros even lift? Most don't seem to. The characterization is too vague.

> Women do not get paid to be condescended towards

That makes sense, and I can imagine how it is experienced as such. It's sad to see.

I remember being on a subreddit once and experiencing it the other way (r/womenover30 or something). When I said something I was downvoted. If a woman said the same thing, she wasn't. I can imagine some women feel that a bit here. Perhaps a lot, but my imagination fails there. I get that it sucks.

> This community is obnoxiously male and condescending, to put it mildly.

What does it mean to be obnoxiously male? I've seen so many different ideas on what it means to be male that I honestly stopped giving a shit about what people mean. It's too confusing, despite me being a hetero cis white male.

I guess it's the autism. Whenever it comes to gender (masculinity and femininity) I mostly see rhetorical nonsense (e.g. some people saying that being emotional sensitive is a feminine quality. It is most likely true that more women are like that, but I just find that whole frame of thinking toxic as the word "femininity" almost implies it's inherent, which I think is highly debatable - I can go on like that for a while, also about masculinity). Could you be a bit more factual so I can make my own conclusions?

I mean, I've been to a feminism class and while that was really useful, I still think the typology is silly.

---

That it is seen as condenscending, that depends. With regards to condescending on women in this thread, I see that. I've also seen it to some extent in other threads. But condescending in general? No. I'm not sure if that's what you mean, but you write a little hand wavy at times. I mean, the points you make still stand, but I think they'd stand better without the labeling things so strongly that are clearly a strong interpretation that I don't understand how you get to it.

I do get the general vibe of the average Hacker News person when the subject is about dating. Comments tend to steer towards hopelessness, and that particular way of being I found is strongly correlated with being out of touch with how women look at certain things. I get the sense when women write something the average HN commenter has an issue to not look past their own trauma in order to listen to what women are saying. In that sense, I can see it's off putting.
Sure,but this isn't Europe and neither is Europe a gold standard of any sort.
This is interesting as others have asserted that they lost because they were still too leftists.

What data would settle this?
I did not say "use listening skills".

If you go back and read carefully, I suggested going directly to the source because we live in an age of unprecedented direct access, and it is no longer necessary to have same-side "explainers" about what the other side thinks and says.

To hear what Team Blue thinks, I'd recommend Team Red simply read the New York Times, the Washington Post, the New Yorker, Time Magazine, et. al. Or watch CNN, MSNBC, BBC America, network news... Even Wikipedia.
A working economy means professional activity to make goods and services. Deflation actively kills that by incentivizing people to defer or cancel their purchases in favor of savings. So economic activity collapses.

There is no such thing as a durable deflationary market if it’s not justified by productivity gains and volume - and there is definitely no such thing as a durable deflationary economy.
> Inflation is actually the increase in the money supply. The term is used wrong almost everywhere today.

I'm sorry I just can't find a single source backing you up.
All sources I find define inflation as increase in prices.
Yes. I think having a healthy community and successful future political campaign will require reframing this rhetoric.
I think a lot of people forgot that before Covid hit, Trump was headed for a fairly routine reelection. Many people thought he was doing a solid job, especially on the economy. All American elections still come down to the James Carville truism, “It’s the economy, stupid!” Despite what the official metrics or stock market says, we’ve been in a “vibesession” due to inflation and elevated interest rates. Anecdotally, I'm still seeing stores run low/out of things far more frequently than pre pandemic times, which just adds to the feeling that all is not right with the world. America is actually in better economic shape than most other countries, but people are not feeling happy or optimistic, and the incumbent party is going to pay for it.
> It’s really hard to be excited about the ACA.

While your complains are all true and the ACA is a mess compared to any developed country, it is still very exciting to have the ACA. For anyone who was barred from getting insurance before, it is the lifesaver, literally.

Compared to other countries, ACA isn't very good (to put it mildly) but compared to how the US was before it, it is the most wonderful improvement ever.
This is nice, but I prefer the simpler style of hckrnews.com
The silk road guy pretty much had a government department trying to shut him down. They don't have the resources to do that for the average individual.
It is a pretty well established IDE. I used it back on a Nexus 4 when that phone was actually "recent" to give you some context.
And an interesting example of "the road to hell is paved with good intentions".
Depends how much deflation there is with wages compared to everything else, there's a scenario that they have an opportunity to start saving

The majority of the expenses for the disadvantaged young are housing, gas, and food. With housing being 4x more expensive than 4 or 5 years it basically puts all the disadvantaged from even buying a house and then puts them at the mercy of the renters market
I agree with your general point, but the comparisons to Russia don't work.

Russia was barely a functioning democracy in the 1990s and had no democratic tradition before that, just different flavors of authoritarianism for centuries.
>why would I want to migrate to any country whose leaders were elected on a platform of hating migrants?

Well, for one: cutting back on illegal immigrants and hating immigrants are not the same thing.

Two: stay where you are? I don't get what your expectations are here. Plenty of skilled immigrants love the US. If it's not your cup of tea, that's fine.
Most of them are geriatric at this point and will naturally be purged.
Can you please not break the site guidelines like this? You've been doing it a lot in this thread, as well as in other unrelated threads, and we've had to ask you this many times before.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

(We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42059721.)
You don't need a degree for kennismigrant thing.
Yet, the price history is what convinces people to buy it. The longer it goes, the more convincing it becomes. Gold has been valuable for thousands of years, which is why everyone knows it will keep being valuable.

Valuations of collectibles and monetary assets, which don't change, are based on their historical price performance. The price history tells the story of how people buy and sell an asset with certain fundamental properties, and that's all the information needed to make an investment decision.
Maybe looks at someone's bio?

I worked there for a decade, so I'm pretty confident when I say "no, it has literally nothing to do with Firefox". They are two completely different orgs with different execs, different boards, working on completely different things. The Foundation has no say over what happens on the corp side.
Because of the pandemic, the aftermath of which was awful inflation. This has been the pattern globally for a few years now. And US-specific, because of immigration.

Yes, Harris was treated by voters as the incumbent, and the incumbent administration was unpopular. That is usually an uphill battle for the incumbent.

It was never the dems election to lose. It's too bad you only saw that narrative! Plenty of people wrote about the possibility that this would be a pretty bog standard "reject the incumbents" election.
The Democratic primary process is rife with superdelegates and other rules designed to promote candidates aligned with the party insiders.

The Republican primary process doesn't have as many ways for party members to put their fingers on the scale.
Just seen the figures, it's ridiculously good. The gap over it's competition is staggering. I hope the Intel hubris doesn't set in at Amd, especially with the ARM pack snapping at their heels.
Show HN: Terraform Module to Deploy Kubernetes on Hetzner Cloud
I want to apologize for my impatience; you don't deserve to be personally attacked, even though what you're saying doesn't make sense.
This conspiracy from Bernie bros is so deeply stupid.

The democratic coalition depends on black voters, and they decisively chose Joe Biden in South Carolina, sending a clear signal about who would have the strength to beat Trump (and in the end they were right).

It was not a party conspiracy.
It’s good to periodically reexamine your own positions against that of the majority and be open to realignment and different ideas, but remember that the collective opinion of society over the long term may look back unfavorably on the collective opinion of society over a period of time in the past. It’s OK to hold minority opinions, and it’s OK to disagree with the majority of Americans who voted for Trump.