Eh, starting off with an ad hominem shows you're lacking emotional regulation and your emotion is going to be clouding your logic; meaning you're not going to be as rationally logical, meaning you're more likely irrational in your conclusions.

You don't appear to know any of the backstory to that situation re: Musk calling the diver a pedophile, just latched onto, probably from confirmation bias, what the media perpetuated/propagated arguably as propaganda to demonize to attempt disempower Elon, an actual threat to the establishment - and you're clearly looking into things at a biased ideological level; lucky for us he has gained/earned enough resources and power to be able to acquire Twitter, and provide the world the Twitter Files for us to know the US government was colluding with big tech to censor voices including highly credentialed experts.

From my understanding Musk had hired a private investigator to look into the diver. The investigator told Musk that the diver was a pedophile - of which is relatively easily believable on the surface based on the known "tourism" - which may or may not be more or less a stereotype. Musk then repeated that.

Perhaps the investigator lied to Musk? Or perhaps the situation isn't that the investigator lied, maybe he did conclude the diver was a pedophile and therefore Musk was relaying the truth, but maybe at minimum the investigator wasn't able to provide any concrete evidence to confirm in a court of law to counter a lawsuit, to help prove that the person was indeed a pedophile (do you have any evidence to the contrary? Or maybe the diver found 15 year olds to have sex with - a quick Google search says is the age of consent in Thailand - unknown if there are other nuances to the law; so maybe by law in Thailand the diver wasn't a "pedophile" - but in America it would be considered illegal-unethical?

I imagine too that the more sophisticated-suave snake oil salesmen/grifters of the world will try to target people like Musk; or is Musk a superhero in your eyes and should be immune to such vectors of attack? So perhaps instead you should be grateful then you've not been competent enough to rise to such a position to attract such scammers - otherwise perhaps develop your critical thinking, do the thought exercise of putting yourself in other peoples' shoes far more often so that you can develop compassion and be less angry and resentful of the world.

You seem to believe the world is far less complex than it is.

This is why propaganda works so well. The vast majority of people won't spend adequate time to understand a situation, if it actually warrants a serious attempt at uncovering the truth - instead ideologues will make conclusions they will put the full weight of their belief behind - acting as if it is 100% true, and without dispersing or distributing the drive of their passion properly across the landscape of their understanding of the world; that usually means they don't have the ability to "let go" and allow emotions-stress to calm and quell completely to their very baseline stress level of perfectly calm, instead they learn to suppress and repress unprocessed or under-processed emotion - which is in fact unhealed trauma, starting in childhood as an abnormal-unhealthy coping mechanism vs. properly processing the emotion to

I'm guessing you also haven't weighed into your conclusion about Musk to include the actual creation of the submarine that where if the water levels hadn't lowered again, that it would have arguably assured that all of those young boys would have survived.

You also probably think his father owned an emerald mine - and haven't read Isaacson's autobiography - because who has time to study a person you appear to think must be very dangerous for society? And incongruently you'd likely not take into account that if Elon could have such eccentric behaviour, then couldn't his father as well have made up an easy lie of having significant shares in emerald mine in order to gain favour in potential business or attracting women?