skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Maybe the fascination from people who never actually lived through fascism. Like people who fantasize about BDSM or CNC sex but would never really do it in real life.

I'm from Spain and even to this day we hear old people saying that "life was better with Franco". I think it's more about a need to have a homogenous society with very clear rules and boundaries.
I get really tired of this narrative that people are pushing that trump voters are somehow ignorant, stupid or simply don't care.

We're not ignorant, we care a lot and we're not being duped. We're really tired of the high gas prices, the moral hypocrisy of the left, the domestic law fare going on attacking political rivals and most of all, we want to afford our groceries and experience a better economy.

Telling us, that the entire base that voted for Trump is either heartless, naive or stupid just isn't going to cut it in reality. People that voted for Trump believe that the President is the diplomatic representative to the world for the American people. He literally got shot and stood up pumping his fist in the air. Joe Biden can barely walk down the stairs without tripping. Kamala had a "phone" call with an undecided voter just yesterday and when she showed the screen it was the camera app. Our choice this election was either the badass who after being shot wanted to show the crowd he was alive or two bumbling idiots. He's not my first choice, but he's a lot better then the Democratic Party offered as alternatives.

We want an American who will fight for business and fight for America to win. We want lower gas prices, which will then make it cheaper to transport goods across the nation and help lower prices in the grocery store.

Trump is not the best person, but he was the better option out of the two party system.
There are extended attributes which could be used for this task.
I edited my comment also a little bit because I wrote in rage. It really feels frustrating the political landscape (voting the "least evil" party).
I'd like to see a study of the dosage from heating food in plastic containers vs the risks from storing food in plastic for days or weeks while in the supermarket, or transporting water for food making in plastic pipes, or growing crops for human consumption in phthalate contaminated land, or eating food from cans lined with phthalates etc.

There are so many potential sources, and it doesn't really make any sense to put effort into something that isn't a substantial source.
Yeah. There seems to also be the implicit assumption that (recorded) pop music, whilst only a relatively recent phenomenon, is here to stay. It isn't. It had a golden age after recording and reproduction technology became cheap enough to own and before streaming services came along, gave us too much choice and siloed our tastes. I don't think I'd change much — I mainly listen to 'weird' stuff that probably wouldn't have existed, let alone be discoverable, without such services — but the pop era does seem to be over. No one cares about 'the charts' anymore. In my parents' day it was a primary cultural reference point that seemingly everyone followed; now almost no one I know would be able to tell me what's in the top ten at the moment.
The other form of curation is place on the front page.

That's probably closer to the editors choice in the context of HN.
That whole story is clutch. Thanks a ton.
Desktop computers are amazing these days.
Hello, I don't see any logs on it. Was it when sending a video request? I forgot to mention there is a video duration limit, I will increase it to 30 minutes in a few days, as well as add pricing plans.
I think their own failed fiscal policy and the pandemic had so much more to do with it than anything Trump did it's not even comparable. I guess we will see how he and his policies do over next 4 years.
> misogyny is hardly the only factor but if there was woman on the top of the ticket than it absolutely seem to be number one factor .

You're going to need to show your working here. How'd you get to this conclusion?
did you feed back into llama.cpp?

also, can it do grounding like cogvlm?

either way, great job!
Yeah, ok? I'm not sure what your point is.

At the time of founding the USA was probably still the most liberal and democratic government in history of the world.
TBH, I'm not sure I can parse your comment correctly, but I'll try anyway:
1. I also work for some subsidiary of VW and honestly them going down is no surprise. It's mismanagement on all levels

2. I'm not sure nuclear is a good think. Sure, no CO2, but waste. Also, building them is just ridiculously expensive.

3. Unfortunately true! But the plans of the SPD were really insane IMHO

4. What I meant is that instead of sending anything to the Ukraine just invest in EU level defense.
Only saving grace. Although Putin is just 6 years younger and his strive to leave legacy already messed up the world. One can only wonder what mess will Trump's attempts at leaving legacy cause.
Not really. I have a family to support and no real alternatives.
I'm curious, what exactly did Biden do to stop Israel from wiping Gaza off the map? What restraints has Israel shown up until now? So even assuming you were right, what exactly would Trump do that could be worse than what Biden has done (eg. Support for everything, and providing for most of the material that led to almost complete destruction of Gaza and now soon Lebanon too).

And in any case my point was more that it is funny to see people talk about how one side only thinks about their rights and not those of the others and how their side has more compassion and empathy. While actively campaigning for the candidate that has been completely supportive of Israel for the past year. Using the reasoning that hey, foreign policy is one thing but at least Biden is better for "us Americans". That to me sounds exactly like thinking about your own rights first, at the detriment of those of all the people who died and suffer from what Biden's administration has enabled.
You're right, he didn't call them that. He called them garbage.
The DS and 3DS were.
> Most critical is the disappearance of dance.

Have you looked at TikTok? It is full of young people performing incredibly complex dance moves.
> If my village forms a union with your village and both our villages have 1000 inhabitants at the time I don't want your village to be able to dictate our common policy just because you have more children or more people died in my village 20 years from now. Thus when we are forming a union we stipulate that we have equal voting rights.

That's not how the electoral college works. The electoral college equivalent would be one village with 1000 people, the second with 2000, and the third with 4000, and each village getting "electoral votes" proportional to their population that gets awarded entirely to the candidate with the majority vote in that village. The entirety of the first two villages vote for candidate A, which awards 1 electoral vote for the first village and 2 electoral votes for the second. In the third village, which has 4 electoral votes, candidate A only gets 1999 votes, whereas candidate B gets 2001 votes, so they win the electoral vote 4-3 and become the leader despite only winning 2001 votes overall out of 7000.

The reason that the analogy needs to be this complicated is because the electoral college isn't some sort of common-sense system that happens to occasionally produce quirky results; it's an extremely contrived system that produces equally contrived results, which shouldn't be remotely surprising.
Yes, I HAVE considered that, it's why I keep ASKING Trump fans. I even stated in my comment that I never get real responses. I get responses like yours, which is "you're wrong, it's been debunked" but I'm never let in on the debunking evidence.

I'm dead serious and 100% sincere: Please show me the evidence. I REALLY want to see it. I don't believe people, I believe data. I don't even believe MYSELF without data.

I live in Georgia, I heard the tape with Trump and Raffensperger, but if you have evidence that call is somehow not true, please share it.

I heard Trump say he has "a concept of a plan" on Healthcare 8 years after he told me he already had a plan. If he's got an ACA replacement, I'd love to see it. I don't understand why it has to be repealed before it can be replaced, usually we just pass new laws that supersede the old one, but whatever, I'll look at whatever you have.

I don't think you can provide evidence that he doesn't complain about everything he doesn't like, every rally comes with a list of grievances. But again, if you have evidence, I'll look at it with an open mind.

And even if you don't have evidence for those things, show me what evidence you DO have, I'll be happy to examine it. I even looked at the stuff Mike Lindell released. I'll always look at evidence, but I just can't do the whole "do your own research" thing any more.
I think we're very nearly there, and this could be the tipping point based on how things shake out. If we take Trump et al at their word, then the US economy is going to violently shudder under the weight of unreasonable tariffs, mass deportations, tax cuts on the obscenely wealthy, and a ramming through of unpopular policies that he proclaims (absent evidence) will fix a given problem. The man is a salesman, and he's good at selling lies to the desperate.

So what happens if he goes so far that the United States loses or jeopardizes its global dominance? The same states that voted heavily for him would be the first impacted, with massive job losses and higher costs. Coastal states and cities wouldn't be too far behind, with higher costs tempered somewhat by proximity to logistics hubs, and unemployment would be more limited due to the higher concentration of jobs. That is, until our economic dominance falters, at which point our heavily-built-up services industry is likely to fracture and collapse in on itself under the weight of competition from countries like India and China.

All of which is to say that, yes, it's a potential outcome that the United States does dissolve in some fashion, as some states seek to preserve their power and economic control even as the Federal Government loses its mind.

Now then, do I personally think this is the outcome? No, not really. We lack debt to spend frivolously on deficit financing, so there goes that easy out. The stock market is not the economy, and workers will quickly realize that when stocks skyrocket and they're all laid off 2008-style, which would be bad for those with the most to gain (billionaires and Private Equity). I still think there's enough backstops in place to prevent runaway collapse and dissolution...

...although the biggest one of all is a divided Congress. If the GOP gets a trifecta (Executive, both Legislative chambers, and SCOTUS), then there's nothing stopping the full suite of plans from being implemented post-haste, at which point the music very suddenly stops and everyone realizes how screwed we are. Our prior backstops, our allied countries, cannot be depended upon with a President that is vocally supportive of Russia and while they're dealing with their own populism issues.

All in all, my read is that while things are about to get really bad, they're not likely to be maximum bad, if that makes sense. The current world order has always been fragile post-Cold War, and this might be the time for a grand realignment. It'd be a shame to lose our dominance, but no empire lasts forever.
It's like how mobile games can stop supporting old phones. e.g. Hearthstone
not necessarily, I just wanted to give an example of the kind of measures that would be required to handle multiple parties that people might already know.
I have LGBTQ+ friends who's lives are demonstrably, objectively worse as a result of Trump's first term. My wife got surgery to have herself sterilized out of fear that were something horrific to happen to her, she wouldn't be able to get the healthcare she needs thanks to the Roe v. Wade decision, which is directly traceable to the "other side." We're about to get a wave of suicides in this country as hopeless minority folks all over the country realize we are entering 4 years of yet more persecution, yet more official policy that will deny them the right to exist as the people they are and they simply can't take it anymore.

All of your comment absolutely holds up when we're talking what should be politics, which is shit like how you organize tax brackets, what priorities we decide are most important to fund, the directions in which we shape our societies. But I am long sick and tired of that same attitude being brought to bear on whether my friends and I have the right to exist as the people we are, whether my wife has the right to decide what happens to her body, and always, ALWAYS with this sardonic tone of "well you can't win em all champ!" as though we just have to accept our differences with people WHO, LITERALLY, GENUINELY WANT US DEAD.

I legit get flashbacks to putting up with bullies in school, where the teacher, bless her and her good intentions, would make you sit and "talk it out" with your bully, as though you in any way whatsoever were responsible for your bullying. As though you and your abuser "just didn't get along" and "needed to work your differences out." And no, categorically, emphatically, to my dying breath, no. The problem between the LGBT community and the Republican party is not a "we just need to respect different opinions" situation. If your opinion is that certain groups of people do not have the right to exist, or should do so with some diminished set of rights, or whatever you'd like to couch it in: your opinion is WRONG and if your paradigm of decision-making cannot see that, then your paradigm is WRONG too.

I wish just ONE of you centrists would have to sit in a public forum as your right to exist is debated, and put on a brave, "rational," calm, and reasonable face and defend that in front of people who would love nothing more than to see you, and everyone like you, ejected from their society so they can freeze to death.
How can I be sure that you didn't vote under a gun point or you haven't been bribed?
> Needs tend to develop once the means are there.

Counterexample: space stations. We've had small manned space stations for decades now, but no real application for them. They're national prestige items only.
Did I say any of that?

> rapist

Source?
Emojis are one of the best things about Unicode. They're not even that complex to handle, and they allow sooooo many things.
In most countries that have them, they are free. Taxes already paid for them. Yes, even replacements
Because I've heard different levels and amounts of insults. It can just be some harmless dad jokes and softball stuff you'd hear in white collar work. It can just be outright sexual harassment. It depends so much on your environment that it's hard to pin down a universal "standard" .
What do you think would be a more correct statement?
Absent other changes in variables, increasing supply generally leads to lower prices.
I don't see how this was a result of complex automation or software appliances interfering with the captain and first officer's ability to fly the plane. The investigation concluded the flight was recoverable until just five seconds before impact. The plane was in full manual flight configuration well before impact. The captain failed to keep the first officer inside the control loop by failing to call out what he was doing and as a result the first officer made the situation worse. The captain stopped giving callouts in response to his perceived frustration with the control tower and the commands they gave.
Looks like 18.2 (beta) already has far more major changes. A couple that stood out to me were new CSS support for View Transitions and many other declarations, and WebAssembly (WASM) support for garbage collection and tail calls.

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-not...
Ok. That's a good point about the radiation belts. I hadn't considered that Jupiter's massive magnetosphere captures & concentrates a huge amount of solar energy & Juno is very close to it. Thanks for the additional info!
At most one. Kinda. Does depend on the beliefs, which are by convention basically unrestricted. Also how we’re defining “true” could easily admit partial truth for a whole bunch that might be incompatible if any were entirely true.
Do a lot of people believe this? Maybe this is why other companies fail at execution, their execs actually think this way.

Support your hardware with excellent software. Do this with minimal fuss, support it for a long time, and you will do better than 99% of other companies.

If I buy something I want it to be supported 5 years from now, not in some cupboard because software support was dropped and the company needed another sale out of me. If I’m expendable, they’re expendable.
> I think there was just a murmur[1] of Biden's problems before the catastrophic debate.

Before the debate, anyone talking about Biden’s obvious decline was dismissed as a right wing troll parroting Russian propaganda.
How are you so confident that it is a joke? I'm not that confused about why people give him a pass on stuff like this, but that doesn't mean I like it.
The Mac is a weird counter example here, the move to 64 bits resulted in many games with official Mac ports (e.g. most of Valve's: Half Life, Portal, etc) no longer being able to run on modern versions of OSX
Sure, in the way that "exercise benefits me, therefore I should do it" and "murder benefits me, therefore I should do it" are structurally similar.
It's not that they lost all of them, but that they make far less money, while the top performers in NYC do well.

It's not unlike what happened to soccer as television got cheaper and cheaper: You can go watch your town's third division team, or you can watch Real Madrid play on TV. In 3rd division nobody can be professional, in 2nd division you make less money accounting for inflation than 30 years ago, but the top players in the top teams are even bigger stars, now that the entire world can watch them play every game.

And on theater, let's not forget that many parts of the spectacle are almost impossible to take on the road. You aren't going to feed a production of Phantom of the Opera in a small town for 3 months: National tours rely on 2 weeks per large-ish metro. And when you are only going to stay there for 2 weeks, there are things you just can't get away with, economically speaking. The equity Hadestown tour would need to remodel way too much to accoout for the lift on broadway. The non-equity tour, which plays even shorter windows, can't even rely on the turntable on the floor. The car in Back to the future isn't going to fly over the audience, do half as much movement, or get fire effects on the scenario.

And even if you look in Broadway itself, many don't recoup their own costs. For every Hamilton or Lion king there are many shows that don't last 6 months.
99% of the time, it's either a quadratic (or exponential) algorithm or a really bad DB query.
> No, I think there needs to be a culture of talking to and respecting people with different opinions.

Absolutely.

> As for the people here explaining themselves clearly - that’s because dang has done a good job of fostering a community of high quality commenters.

Hard disagree. The level of political discussion on HN is barely a step above r/politics. This is a forum for 110 IQ codecels who think minor domain expertise means they are smarter than everyone else in all aspects.

The contempt for ordinary people in this very thread is nauseating.
Oh, I think I get your point, you want people to simply ignore folks that gleefully transgress social norms and exercise sexism, racism, and other bigotries against people who, by your definition, are mentally ill and thus a worthy target of mockery and conduct unbecoming christianity's moral standards, or by most normal people, are guilty of being women, of being men, of being gay, of being lesbian, of being queer, of being trans, of being of light pigment, of being educated, of being uneducated, of being homeless, of actually being mentally ill, of being disabled, of being children, of being elderly, of being generally unwanted by a heaving horde of hate.

Do you believe the same for people who violate religious taboos?

Regardless of the answer, we're far afield of the original discussion, and I'll not pursue this thread further.

Though, I do empathize -- it must be highly embarrassing to have racism, sexism, and other bigotries noted as being offensive to people in public. Triumphalism, often a result of religious fervor, masks that in an echo chamber, so social media can be jarring for folks in such a situation.

---

PS

>> If that's not sexist, I don't know what is.

This fact is quite apparent that you don't know what sexism, and somehow think it applies in a situation where a trans fem wants to be in a situation more protective than forcing a locker room share with her sexual assignment at birth. What your assumed resolution, coached carefully by pollsters no doubt before being coached through formal and informal propaganda channels, actually is is transgressive and probably unnecessary. Though to redefine sexism as "not respecting of gender norms my religion requires me to prefer" is quite a stretch
"Car production is about 17% of GDP"

Not sure where you got this number. Actually it's been between 4% and 5% for the last couple of years.
What about me? I'm gay and they have promised to make this a christian nation - they think God made me wrong so how am I supposed to feel when he wins like this?

I'm supposed to think my fellow man has made any attempt to understand me? I'm not supposed to be afraid after they support someone who has said they want me gone??

I'm a white man in America, the most powerful country in the history of the world and I'm considering fleeing this place like a f*king refugee - it is obscene that I'm in a position to even be considering such a thing.
> Same in the US. Especially in the party that now lost.

I'd say it's the same in both parties
I'm sure they see the differences, just decide to evaluate them as irrelevant. Which is their right as adults.
Hey - are you still looking for an alternative to Stripe/Spreedly? Who are you using today? referencing your previous posts.
The GBA (original and SP) also supported OG Gameboy games, but the Gameboy Micro only supported GBA games

The 3DS also had games from other consoles for sale in the eShop, but they were emulated (GB, GBC, Game Gear, NES, SNES). If you bought a 3DS before the price drop, you could also play some GBA games. These are also running natively, not emulation https://en-americas-support.nintendo.com/app/answers/detail/...
"You probably rely on medicaid or medicare or the AHCA for health coverage. The first two are going to get slashed and the third is going to get shit-canned. Oh, and if you have a pre-existing condition, that's going to come under consideration again. Price controls are going away for medications you or your kids might rely on. There will be no raise in minimum wage and with tariffs coming, you might as well get a third job."

That would be my response, based on the past actions of republicans under Trump.
The makeup is a great analogu. I can bet with 99.9% that when I say a woman is wearing makeup that I'm correct (or it is tattoed on or similar). When it's obvious, it's obvious. However I don't detect makeup on women quite often.

The economists is not not as good of an analogy, almost converse of the makeup example as that is a high rate of false positives.
I got emails from the county (Boulder County, CO) when they mailed me my ballot, when they received it, and when they counted it.
I really hope too. If Taiwan falls, what message does it send to Japan, South Korea, the Philippines? Are the US willing to lose their influence there and give a free pass to China?