skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The same response if someone calls you a racist white man. Dgaf
Let be real though. The majority of the Trump stimulus was either a campaign stunt (I received a letter from Trump stating that he gave me, someone that makes 6 figures, a few hundred dollars) or a huge spending program with no accountability (the PPP “loans”).
The S&P 500 is up 2.4%. The only economists you need to listen to are the ones who put their money where their mouth is.
Lets say you are right and the correct interpretation is:

"and if everything goes well, maybe you won't need to vote for me again"

Trump would be term limited, so they would not be able to vote him in as president again anyway. That is why this interpretation does not make sense to me.
Anonymous, but prior to that it was Dharmesh from Hubspot https://domainnamewire.com/2023/05/25/chat-com-sells-for-8-f...
He's always been all-in on the winning candidate. His whole business is getting government subsidies. His single principle is sucking up to people in power. He loved Obama when he was in power, too.

Proud to say I've found that asshole annoying since WAY before it was cool.
You're not alone, friend. A three body problem would make for more interesting dynamics.
I think if they actually advocate violence against minority groups, start genocidal wars, cancel elections etc.
>> Their messaging was totally different from 2020, everything was clear and understandable.

But when you have the VP is running for the office that her boss has just occupied for the last four years, the whole point of the VP running is to continue what they started - not suddenly say you would do a bunch of stuff differently when YOU were riding shotgun on the poor economy, inflation, immigration and crime.

Harris was asked repeatedly what she would do differently and said "nothing". She was a horrific candidate. She couldn't speak to voters without a teleprompter, she was a cringe worthy public speaker, she was never on message and always reverted back to, "Well Donald Trump did this and that." which never connected with voters.

She also had a front row seat to Biden's mental decline and repeatedly went in front of the media and defended him to the very end when he was removed and she replaced him. Harris was the same person who got zero financial support from democrats during the 2020 campaign, had to drop out and didn't even make the primaries because of the lack of support from voters.

If you were paying attention, this was completely predictable.

By contrast, Trump was on message, had a plan, left all of his divisive rhetoric at the door. He connected with voters, reached across the aisle and formed a coalition with RFK, Gabbards and Musk. He went on podcasts to reach younger voters. Anybody else see Vance on the Theo Von podcast? He campaigned relentlessly in the key battleground states, he did tons of impromptu interviews.

There's a reason he's projected to get 300+ electoral votes AND win the popular vote and nothing in your comment would seem to understand why.

Take a look at the markets today.
Take a look at the price of Bitcoin right now.

The country wanted significant change and they voted that way.
Well over ten million votes are still yet to be counted on the West Coast. Is there a reason why you haven't considered this? If you add uncounted votes then the total count is only 5 million less than 2020. Such swings have certainly happened before between adjacent elections, such as from 2000 to 2004.
Aren't gaussian splats incompatible with most common game development styles? No shadows, no rigging/animation as main issues - or maybe I'm misunderstanding / behind on the research - please correct me.
I was under the impression that most economist said that the ARP and IRA was a significant contributor to inflation (amongst many other factors, supply chain issues, war in Ukraine, labor shortages, etc.), so it’s not factually incorrect to lay some amount of culpability on the administration?
Performance is surprisingly great, but of course it’s not as sharp/high res as you would get on a PC.
Just because people ate their own children during a siege doesn't mean it's morally acceptable.
I worked at a Fortune 1 company that used one repo per release for a certain major software component.
In my experience this turns to nightmare when (not if, when) there is need to make changes to the libraries and app at the same time. Especially with libraries it's often necessary to create a client for an API at the same time to really know that the interface is any good.
Honestly while Trump is a little slimy he's also kinda funny. Visit some conservative spaces sometimes, they're having fun while liberal ones are all doom-and-gloom.

It really does matter.
Ha, when I search through my history I usually find I ran them exactly once, right after installing, and then forgot all about them. But there are some exceptions, I often use httpie instead of curl, MTR is great, I am liking doggo instead of dig...
Well said. Speaking as a registered Republican dating back to the early 2000s, I thought Trump was a clown when he first announced his intention to run in 2015 (you could call me a "Never Trumper"). I was shocked like everybody else when he won, but I took comfort in the fact that he was still mostly surrounded by old establishment Republicans who I figured would keep things on-the-rails or just impeach him within the first six months. I mean, he had some wackos like Bannon and Flynn and his family members, but he also had old establishment Republicans (in his cabinet and congress) and other non-politicians that I (as a career Army officer) really respected like Kelly, Mattis, Esper, McMaster, and Milley. My expectations were sort of met.

But now what? The Republican establishment has been re-made in his image. The people I respect have all gone public against him in the strongest possible ways. Who will serve under him? I really don't know what to expect this time around.
No offence, but you might be a little confused by how complex your actual delivery is. That sounds simple. That sounds like it has a clear roadmap. When you don’t, and you have very agile development that pivots quickly and demands a lot of change concurrently for releases that have very different goals, it is not possible to make all your ducks sit in a row. Monorepos suck in that situation. The dependency graph is so complex it will make your head hurt. And all the streams need to converge in to the main dev branch at some point, which causes huge bottlenecks.
Have you heard of OpenShift 4? Self-hosted Kubernetes by Red Hat. Every little piece of the control plane is its own 'operator' (basically a microservice) and every operator is developed in its own repo.

A github search for 'operator' in the openshift org has 178 results:

https://github.com/orgs/openshift/repositories?language=&q=o...

Not all are repos hosting one or more microservices, but most appear to be. Best of luck ensuring consistency and quality across so many repos.
Lynx wrapped in Docker:

https://github.com/jzombie/docker-lynx
Unfortunately it seems the gambit to hold the congress hostage has worked for them. Bad juju for any sort of attempt at building political alliances if you are punished for compromising across the aisle, but rewarded for holding the populace hostage until you get a supermajority to enact 100% of your agenda.
I have a little extension I wrote for myself to improve some things, and that's also having difficulty. So yeah, not just you.
Not to mention that people doing boring, safe jobs behave like that too. Trust me, when I have the banter with my friends in the pub, I'm really not evaluating whether I can rely on their accountancy or web design to save my life

What actually seems to be the common factor is male groups in informal settings
Sources and sinks - where does the money go? What is it subsequently used for?
I 100% agree with this but that is almost as if to say, "lrn2code", which cannot work at scale, being the sole benefit of a particular memetic virus.
Obama space policy was ok though. I think Biden was great in every other respect, but his space policy is a clear step back from Trump's.
You misread their last two comments on the 18 years old remark. The mention of 6 years was a hypothetical for if the age restriction wasn't set at 18.
This is true but not at all relevant to anything I said, as I was not talking about DIMMs.
I heard an interesting thought on a podcast about Trump. Because he's always used and discarded his 'friends' his entire life, he's gotten very good at getting new people to like him. People say that 1:1 he can be very charming, just up to the point where he stabs you in the back.
Also a note that the XBox security CPU, Pluton is a requirement for more recent PC hardware architecture designs.

And for Rust fans, its firmware has been rewriten.
>So now any change to one service required deploying that service and pulling down the OpenAPI spec to regenerate client bindings. It was so clumsy and easy to make simple mistakes.

Why? Is your framework heavily tied to client bindings? APIs I consume occasionally get new fields added to it for data I don't need. My code just ignores it. We also have a policy you cannot add a new mandatory field to API without version bump. So maybe REST API would have new field but I didn't send it and it happily didn't care.
Now, let's tally how many just one of the prominent right-wing figures has pushed since 2016. It should be fun.
Even if Intel wasn't chugging so badly right now, their recent handling of the overvoltage and oxidation fiasco where they only thought about covering their asses instead of working the problem would leave me with a pretty disgusting taste in my mouth if I bought anything Intel for the foreseeable future. Customer relations should mean something, just look at Noctua.
Jupiter's perihelion is only 5AU from the sun. I suspect that Jupiter could fall well short (mass-wise) of being a star, yet still be big enough to destabilize Earth's orbit.
Sometimes security and integrity matter more than convenience.
I'm not ignoring it, it's just that it doesn't alter the calculus for every other nation who might be the target of NATO at some point in the future. NATO only needs to engage in an offensive action once for the precedent to be set permanently. How justified the action was just doesn't matter.

It also underscores the point that there is no objective moral standard to which we can appeal to simultaneously allow an intervention without also permanently altering the power balance in relevant regions. The US right now says genocide is beyond the pale thus warranting intervention. In the future they may say cracking down on political dissent is beyond the pale thus warranting intervention in Russia. Moral impetus tend to be subject to scope creep at the behest of current national interest.
Yes, the issue is the change in behavior in a bugfix version. I don't remember the exact details.
I'm not attacking your grammar, but now I question your ability to understand a sentence.

(English isn't my first language, BTW, so I'd be grateful if you could point the grammar errors)
I think there are two things:

1. Try the Trump/populist playbook on the topic: identify the problem, empathize, be mad, let them vent, but don't really focus on a solution.

2. Advocate austerity as a solution to inflation. Might be less economically ideal, but more politically viable.

edit to add: iow, Harris and other Dems could have thrown Biden under the bus a bit to try to avoid some of the blame. It's cold, and Biden directed an actually decent response to the supply-shock-driven inflation, but it'd be a kind of shrewdness like getting Biden to drop out that might have helped.
Warren Washington, Groundbreaking Climate Scientist, Dies at 88
"You can't put extreme tariffs like 200% and expect prices to come down."

See Smoot Hawley - it passed in 1930, and deflation accelerated. Economy is a complicated system.
It's explained further down the page that this launch time will facilitate the Indian Ocean landing in sunlight, for improved visual capture of that.
https://archive.ph/2024.11.06-181235/https://www.nytimes.com...
incumbents all around the world have performed terribly post COVID. UK, Canada, Japan, France, Italy, have all had landslide or shocking election results.

Unsure what the general mood is that can lead to Keir Starmer dropping 30 points in approval months after winning in a landslide, but the mood of general discontent may be relevant in the United States as well. It seems whatever the status quo / incumbent advantage that used to exist, is now working against candidates.

Even if the democrats ran a better candidate in a better campaign, it may not have been enough to overcome these headwinds. Although, I'm not sure I totally believe that myself since she lost by a pretty narrow margin in swing states.

Obviously not to excuse the dems, just something to consider
This is why GP is nervous: Trump's "swift end" will likely be trying to broker a deal where Ukraine gives up all the disputed territory, and Russia effectively wins, validating Putin's approach to territorial expansion.
Huh, I wonder how many adult content filters that domain is still on. That might be an impediment to them making it the primary domain in the short term.
Really? I'd say there is a political difference. I can escape a private corporation if I really wanted to, or shop elsewhere for that specific content. I can't generally escape government rules unless they're specially crafted to carve out private schools. And if they do carve out private schools, then you're saying the materials aren't actually harmful to rich privileged kids and only the poors?
I kind of agree...

My strongest lifelong work friends definitely came from grad school where none of that happened. Or from research work where it didn't either. But there it was pressure and performance and cooperation that helped. It breeds trust.

In blue collar work, esp team oriented which it often is, I'm not sure it's the shop talk or the team/trust environment. Either way i felt the same bond to people making pizza 5 busy nights in a row as I did late night coding sprints while pair programming, or contorting under the steel hull of a target boat to reach a bad CPU while my colleague watched the terminal while seasick and we are both drinking diesel funes.

It's about shared trust I think. The level of casualness of shop talk is just an indicator and kind of a stress test of bonds.
Hispanic men voted Trump. Overall Harris lost a lot of ground in the Hispanic vote compared to Biden.
You're not wrong about people resenting being talked down to. I've tried to make this point to Democratic (especially progressive) activists for years and years and it's like talking to a dog that just heard a new noise. The fraction of people in the country that actually care about religious culture wars is relatively small; it's one reason why seven states passed initiatives enshrining abortion rights in their state constitutions this go-round. Voters care deeply about concrete things that affect their lives and they're not receptive to someone haranguing them to care about something else entirely.

If you want to catch a fish, you bait the hook with something the fish wants to eat instead of something you want the fish to eat.
Attempting it and failing doesn't mean he didn't attempt it. He actively tried to stop the results being certified, he tried to get people to fraudulently invent votes for him. We have the Trump–Raffensperger call on tape, the evidence is right there, it's an indisputable fact by anyone who cares about reality.

And no, I wouldn't be wrong, because it's a fact he did try to do that, and even if they did—for whatever reason—decide not to try it again, that doesn't change it being what any reasonable person should assume they will do.
It's just 22nd amendment. Can't be more important than the will of the nation. The only question is do the Americans like Trump as much as they like booze or can it be at least made to look like they do.
Absolutely agree. The libertarian view of tariffs is that they limit free trade, and are often used for inefficiently for market manipulation than as a funding source.

One question this US election cycle has brought up is how to best fund a government. Every reasonable person understands that a government needs funding to operate. But every mechanism employed has trade offs. But I have not found enough information to develop an informed opinion on under what conditions a flat tariff on imports be better than a progressive income tax, a flat income tax be better than capital gains, etc. Tax policy is adhoc, driven by a multitude of factors. If you or anyone can provide an interesting survey on some principle approaches to tax policy I would be grateful.
+1. America has immense sociopolitical inertia. It is absolutely incomparable to societies like 1930s Germany, 1910s Russia, or post-war China that gave rise to the brutal dictatorships of the 20th century. This a blessing if you are worried about totalitarianism, and a curse if you are hoping for deep structural reform.
The failure was keeping the economy locked down too long and sending checks to everyone in the world. My father in law that lives in Germany for the past 50 years, got a check from the US.
All I get is "Failed to load stories," am I doing something wrong? Is there something I need to configure before things will load?
I built an AI hitch to have better dates
No.
MPI is an interface, free to use a wide range of implementations.
Most people have no idea what GPT means or what GPT products existed before ChatGPT. But that means those 3 letters occupy their own space in their head and that space is the same as "AI chatbot". That gives OpenAI a lot of power that Anthropic won't have with "Claude" or Google with "Gemini".
It's not groundbreaking but it's important. They are demonstrating in orbit relight capability of the raptor engines. This is an absolute requirement before they can put it fully into orbit because losing control of a Starship in low earth orbit would be catastrophic.
> the intent is to destabilize the country not pick a particular candidate.
I get that, probably if I got you talking to my "dead gummint" friends you'd talk past each other about the word "damaging", they'd say "that's not damaging at all, what are you smoking?" etc. etc.

Just to be clear, what you need to understand if you want to bring them back Right is that for them "damaging" is defined by "someone shows up with a gun at your house and tells you to do something that you don't want to do." Amazon can do whatever, precisely because the people who Amazon sends to your house, like they might have a gun if they're practicing open-carry, but they don't tell you to do anything that you don't want to do. They literally cannot define any damage that Amazon is doing by manipulating their marketplace, because Amazon's not sending out the Men With Guns.

And just to be clear, again, I don't agree with my friends on these matters, I just find it absolutely fucking nuts that back when I was a hardline conservative I made these friends and now that I'm moderate and independent somehow they are the ones that I'm seeing supporting Kamala and the Democrats.
> Is the French system a good example of a multi-party system?

I would say yes in the sense a new party can (and did) emerge and rise to power when there is demand. Even before that you had some healthy rise and fall of political parties and political alternance beyond just two main contenders.

> It currently seems to be struggling with handling three parties

There are like 6 parties with more than 10% of seats, the current government is a coalition of five parties (from two main "families") and no shutdowns or hung parliament.

> Doesn't guarantee proportional representation

That however is true, and by design. This is a property the french voting system share with eg: ranked choice and other systems that aim at resolving the compromise as part of the election rather than afterwards.

I don't mean to say that the french voting system is perfect (I quite like ranked choice), simply that it is a functioning one with interesting properties.
Hm... I get the point they are making, but on the other hand I had a pizza with truffle at a pizzeria that according to the article was likely synthetic... But I really liked it. The labelling should definitely be clear and transparent, no question! However, there can probably be space for both, since I don't think my experience would be better without synthetic flavoring while also staying in a comparable price range.
As long as you relink with relocations preserved in the final ELF binary, it should.
I contend his analogy is wrong; it's not like "inflation" changed from a money policy thing to a labor market thing.
The original year 1919 definition was actually a response to an openly belligerent threat.

https://external-preview.redd.it/bgOMQfMeKo_CF5XXqX485aPKRvwVc_P5ue0EW5S_9dk.jpg?auto=webp&s=49296031d016df4f5380c78d7b41981b03ba035d
I find a lot of his voters seem to respond to criticisms with "Oh don't worry, he's not actually going to do those things." I think your point about making his lying a feature of his candidacy is spot on. Here's to hoping that nothing ever happens.
Kagi allows you to share a URL to a specific search results page. Maybe it's time to revive the idea...
Why do you think crime is down?

Looking at 12 month running averages from FBI UCR since 2012, crime has been in a generally increasing trend from the last minimum, which was in the 12 months starting Jan 2020, to a maximum in the year starting Dec 2022.

https://cde.ucr.cjis.gov/LATEST/webapp/#/pages/explorer/crim...
Did – Decentralized global social feed
The number of people I know who voted for Trump, AND Bernie—is incredibly high. Now we'll never know!
yeah, digging up that screenshot (and the repo) really made me realize how primitive this solution was. it was also a very basic implementation of the whole headline sizes concept.

there was an app called Flipboard at the time which did something similar, but for different news sources, although its model of interactivity was a bit more gimmicky than the endless scroll. (which, for all its faults, is really simple and easy to use.)
I've been working at public libraries and I hear young people say "ChatGPT" several times per hour.
Wasn't OpenAIs bid to trademark "GPT" rejected though? That name isn't a moat if anyone can use it.
Obama and Clinton both were not at the top of the party apparatus at the time of their first runs. Compare to Gore, Harris, and the other Clinton in 2016. I think the DNC clearly needs to step back and let the party make its own choice.
Just picture Bernie Sanders hammering home that the wealthy are screwing everybody. That's the kind of messaging they need but they would rather loose than move left.
Personally I wouldn't do the spending tracking for individuals to decide tax rates just because it's complex and perhaps to intrusive.

I'd go with same tax rates for everybody, but tax credits for useful activities. Since being a poor consumer is useful activity because those pay most attention to what they buy I'd be just giving people tax credit for existing and possibly for working if I wanted to incentivise that. Since purchase tax for individual consumers should be collected and paid by the sellers to save the individuals the burden of it and to ensure compliance then the best form of tax credit for consumers is just cashed given them directly from the government. Some for existing some possibly to supplement their salaries if they work. There's some risk that they won't spend it all to pay for their purchase tax but this can be forgiven as it'll mostly happen for the very poorest.
not sure about reducing it to just chat but using the entire "chat gpt" as a verb is really common like "let me chatgpt this assignment" (love it or hate it is very common in schools)
He cares about freedom and the spark of consciousness, of which he requires a foundation of a strong and free country; maybe you're being perfectionistic, e.g. The Selfish Gene?