skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There's feels much more detailed and thoughtful than yours.

Yours for example doesn't allow one to insert diagnostics or allow for example for things like inserting all tabs open and all files open at once.

They also allow jumping from editing to chatting mode by simply doing command enter.
They’ve been incapable of holding actual primaries since at least 2016. They curate, subvert, stifle, and influence who rises up from the primary election. They don’t care at all about democracy or the republic. Any Democrat who is a populist that actually cares about the American people, ex Bernie Sanders, will be shut down in favor of one that can push globalist agendas at the expense of the local population in exchange for looting the national treasury. When Bernie stepped out of line and genuinely wanted to help people, the DNC establishment whipped him back into step and reminded him who’s boss. I’m genuinely surprised this election appeared to ever be close.

America was saved and a better chapter begins. Do you disagree? A plurality of Americans agree with that sentiment as evidenced by the popular vote and the winning of all 7 swing states.
So then why aren't they banning the app?
> Durant, who made his money off the boom, said he put his time and money into the project to show people that they aren’t helpless to technology giants and that we can figure out massive problems if we work together.

I can appreciate the sentiment but

> The discovery was the result of almost exactly one year of work and about $2 million of Durant’s own money.

doesn't really show me much especially since

> The prime number Durant discovered serves no real purpose for society.

This sort of shows the opposite: if it takes $2M to discover something that doesn't have a real purpose, yeah I definitely feel a bit helpless against tech giants trying to do anything that is marginally useful.
I'm really annoyed when lisp languages use infix operators. Is it really so hard to write (= (f a) b) over (f a = b)? In fact, can you even call it lisp if the first element of the list isn't the operation of that list? Perhaps if they had a special bracket type for definitions I would be more amenable to it, but the idea that a symbol half way through a list completely changes its meaning simply doesn't sit right with me. Isn't this just a term rewriting system with an extra pair of parentheses?

Also, why is this needed over the second line?

(map a (:lambda fun) = fun a)
(map a fun = fun a)
What if ByteDance operating outside of Canada stores the data in ca-central-1?
It's not clear to me how anything you're talking about relates to my previous comment. Could you attempt to make your point more explicitly?
The example was just to illustrate a point about a forced push.

You’re correct about keys/certs once uploaded, they should be treated as compromised, especially when the repository isn’t self-hosted. However, replacing API keys and certificates can take time, and within a large corporation, it could take months.
This is not just California. I live in Washington and wouldn't have been able to afford my house if I was buying today. Inflation + interest rates + price jumps.
South Korea.

Ukraine is arguably in this category as well already.
Gold in a vault
> It’s not at all clear that that is even plausible.

Given this latest news about Tik Tok, i'd say it's more than likely, since this is hardly the biggest threat from China, especially if they've compromised members of the government.

You would think it would be an all out 5-alarm fire, and dealt with in the most expedient (and hopefully transparent) way possible. So that the public know they can trust all their government representatives.

> Also, the CSIS appears to be making very unequivocal statements in support of the policy approach.

The government has investigated itself, and found itself innocent, and following a divine path.
If you look at the past ~15 or so years in the US, it has been pretty constant flip flopping. I think that's a general condemnation of the status quo, and unsurprisingly. For many people the economy just doesn't work for them like it used to.

At the same time, I think the media talking heads put much too much effort into explaining the results, and they basically give the electorate much too much credit. To be blunt, your average voter is not particularly smart, or at least they aren't able to draw a line between cause and effect. Take inflation for example, which many pundits say was the major issue of this election. But if you look at essentially any economist, of any particular political leaning, they will say that Trump's proposed policies (e.g. massive tariffs) are absolutely horrible for inflation. Similarly, at the end of Trump's 1st term, he was absolutely berating Powell for not having even looser monetary policy in 2019 despite extremely low unemployment.

I think it's fine to argue the Dems did a ton of stupid shit (a lot of this I may agree with), but it's pretty clear that the electorate wants a strongman right now, and that's basically the antithesis of what the Democratic Party wants at large. I also think the Dems haven't accepted the fact that there is zero chance a woman from the managerial class will be elected president.
what timing? I have no idea what you are referring
Egyptian priestess' burial chamber unearthed after 4k years
The only reason I think they would do this is because of espionage, so you want to remove the offices but keep the app. But there is no proof provided within the article.
Is always striking when I see a really good musician perform live.

It hits you like a ton of bricks.

This is a local Bay Area band and all 3 members are exquisitely skilled in more than one instrument.

https://www.howelldevine.com/
Everything you wrote in your first paragraph sounds pretty boilerplate. You can't seriously say he has gone above and beyond Biden, Obama, or Bush. And if he's not unique, then your vendetta seems personal, which makes you seem hypocritical.
Hmmm... I nominate Mortal Kombat (1995) for the cringiest title drops. Instead of being used once for a climatic fight scene, they keep dropping it over and over (10 times according to the article).
The American people have clearly spoken that those are not in fact disqualifying.
Gimp 3.0 RC1 Released
I'm curious if habits like smoking will ever make a resurgence. Seems like the rates keep going down. I can't imagine we'll ever go back to a time where smoking in restaurants or bars is normalized again.
I think there’s a lot of truth to this, and it’s worth reflecting on.

Trump survived an assassination attempt, a series of questionably motivated legal challenges, and then leaned into showing up for hostile interviews during the campaign.

At a time where there is armed conflict spreading across the world again, this kind of personality is appealing to a large portion of the population, and understandably so.
Well he doesn't know how to divide. If private sector does 2% and government does 1% then government is 50% not 33%. Similarly he displays the level of government spending, not the change. If government is 30% of GDP, then automatically its 30% of GDP growth no matter what. And again 30% is really 50% of the private sector. Now if the government grows from 30% to 35% like it shows on that chart, in addition to few quarters of 50%, thats how you get to government being 100% of the growth. Just use $, the % is clearly too hard for HN.
Economy was 100. Government 30, private sector 70. Economy grew to 105, government 35, private sector 70. So 100% of the growth was government.
I hope the author reads this comment, HN is being a weird echo chamber. Bayesian probability people, what is the chance that All In is actually wrong based on a random blog post.
> sacks is good at logic/debating and It seems they use that to push a RW pov without sounding like they are endorsing it by presenting a weak/half baked opposition to it.

This is a really great point I completely hadn’t considered.
The way that Trump mismanaged covid resulted in tens or hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2021/02/11/trumps-pol...
> the above rights have no particular appeal at all to people who are neither pregnant

This doesn't sound right to me. You don't have to be pregnant to be interested in keeping abortion legally accessible. You don't even have to be a woman. Keeping a fetus in your body for 9 months when you don't want it is a horror movie scenario for me, and I'm guessing most other women feel the same way. And there are surely many men who want that option available for their partners, as well.

FWIW I also support (2) for those who want it.
My god I love BZ98. For me, the remaster was frustrating. The most annoying thing was that certain things, like the combat AI, had been improved in ways that broke the balance of the single player campaign. I doubt players with the subject’s level of mastery would be bothered, but it significantly reduced my enjoyment.

It remains a rare gem, though. There are so few RTSs that place you in the world there isn’t even a name for the genre. The only others I can think of are Brutal Legend and Sacrifice. But BZ98 was the one that I discovered first.
I tried Cursor and found it annoying. I don’t really like talking to AI in IDE chat windows. For whatever reason, I really prefer a web browser. I also didn’t like the overall experience.

I’m still using Copilot in VS Code every day. I recently switched from OpenAI to Claude for the browser-based chat stuff and I really like it. The UI for coding assistance in Claude is excellent. Very well thought out.

Claude also has a nice feature called Projects where you can upload a bunch of stuff to build context which is great - so for instance if you are doing an API integration you can dump all the API docs into the project and then every chat you have has that context available.

As with all the AI tools you have to be quite careful. I do find that errors slip into my code more easily when I am not writing it all myself. Reading (or worse, skimming) source code is just different than writing it. However, between type safety and unit testing, I find I get rid of the bugs pretty quickly and overall my productivity is multiples of what it was before.
> The discovery was the result of almost exactly one year of work and about $2 million of Durant’s own money.

> Durant, who made his money off the boom, said he put his time and money into the project to show people that they aren’t helpless to technology giants and that we can figure out massive problems if we work together.

If I sold absolutely everything I owned, I would not even have close to half of what it Durant invested in his pet project. While I like his intended sentiment, I can't help but notice the irony.
No one was shafted. He lost. He lost as bad as Hillary Clinton did to Obama in 2008. Literally the same margin of defeat. You just got manipulated into thinking it was something sinister. You can probably thank a foreign power for that.
It's "toe" the line FWIW.
> None of that listed technology comes from building reusable rockets.

Lower launch costs are a force multiplier for all of those technologies and more.

> This “boom” is all private for profit companies spending investment money. Not a “boom” in the sense that any man can get involved and benefit in the tangible future.

It sounds like your issue is more with capitalism than space...

But lower launch costs decrease the capital needed to particpate is space, so you point still doesn't make sense.

> Pretending that everyone is going to be better off because of this space dream delusion doesn’t really answer my question.

Everyone is already better off because of the soace dream. You don't seem to actually want an answer to your question.
I liked the smiley/simpsons colored emoji. They didn't need different skin tones.
Difficult to compare, not only neurons are vastly more complex, but the neural networks change and adapt. That's like if GPUs were not only programmed by software, but the hardware could also be changed based on the training data (like more sophisticated FPGAs).

Our DNA also stores a lot of information, but it is not that much.

Our dogs can learn about things such as vehicles that they have not been exposed to nearly enough, evolution wide. And so do crows, using cars to crack nuts and then waiting for red lights. And that's completely unsupervised.

We have a long way to go.
It's not the peace that is the problem but the compromises that will be necessary to bring about Trump's promised swift peace.
Ha, we both basically posted the same thing ( see above )!
He was establishing the age of 18 years old as a reference point for the lower bound for when people are able to make adult decisions. His mention of the age of 6 after this, which your primary contention with him seemed to be about, was separate from this and was him trying to make an example of what he sees as how the medical system can be abused when there are not strict age related regulations. I think that it's clear that you disagree with him on the 18 year age restriction, but wanted to clarify that the 6 years number that he used in his example didn't have any significance in its specificity, but was just some number between 0-17.
I'd find something else to do; there's no shortage of entertainment options these days. I certainly wouldn't let it "ruin my day". If the unavailability of a single video game actually ruins your whole day, you have a very sad life.
How can you be sure that any voter wasn't bribed?
The diagnostic information is really two things: (1) whether you get the packet back to begin with and (2) where it comes from and the ICMP state, which, yeah, is stuff that's part of IP anyway. The point was that the response is also a packet, and subject to all the same potential issues as the packet it's responding to.
Node Identifiers in Graph Neural Networks
I pay approximately 25x more road tax than the average driver here.

But you're not, it's to make up for the revenue TX would get from you via the gas tax. Also EVs are heavier on average therefore do more damage to the road so paying for that too.
Go to any middle school in America and figure out who the popular kids are. It's not the ones with good ideas on how to improve education, or even to get Xboxes in every classroom - its the hot, mean kids with charisma who make the other hot mean kids laugh. Its human nature to want to be in that in-group. When you ask them why they vote a certain way, they say something about the economy or trans kids or whatever, but IMHO it's much more primal than any of that. The dems are still campaigning to the greatest generation but society has regressed and America is just one big middle school right now.
Dump in favor of what? Euros? Yuan? Gold? For better or worse there's still no practical alternative to the dollar as the world reserve currency, regardless of how the supply is inflated. The BRICS group keeps talking about creating a new currency for international trade but they can't agree on anything specific.
Now do hard drives
It's a signal that existing funding mechanisms are no longer capable of supporting governments demands. So governments have gotten very creative at "off label deficit spending."
"or paying for the required license?"

Where was the acceptance of a contract requiring that? Microsoft just gave people a free upgrade.
>No one I've pointed this out to has been able to empathize with these people yet, most coming up with glib replies about how everything for those voters will be even worse now that the other candidate won.

Right, because how do you empathize with someone who gets $1, and their response is: Oh yeah? Well fine then I'm going to vote for the person who wants to take away literally EVERYTHING to show you!

It is the definition of cutting off your head to spite your body.

I completely understand and empathize with someone on SNAP not getting what they need to cover the insane pricing increases we saw greedy corporations force upon all of us and wanting that rectified. But if your solution to that is to either not vote at all, or intentionally vote for the guy who has literally told you his plan is to gut all social services... I'm not sure what to tell you beyond whatever empathy I DID have for you is gone and enjoy sleeping in the bed you just made for yourself. I, and most of the folks on HN are going to be perfectly fine. Those folks that were on SNAP? Good luck...
I am tempted to import this data into my system and build a pivot table of building type (PRIM_OCC) by state.

I could then graph the data (pie chart, bar graph, etc) to show how the building type distribution (e.g. residential ratio per hospital) varies between the states.
While mass to orbit costs as much as it does now, sure. However later on it's gonna be great to have humans closer to the working robots to reduce the round-trip latency. They could also perform tasks robots are not suited for.

Consider operators living on Mars and operating drones near their habitat each day. It would be like modern day drone operators and robot assisted surgery. Like remote operators of mega-trucks today.

Those robots could interact with the operators - driving into a "garage" that can be pressurized for maintenance, upgrades or science.

StarShip promises to reduce the cost of mass to orbit, making larger and more complex scientific, industrial and habitat options feasible.
Did they fix multiline editing yet? Any interactive input that wraps across 3+ lines seems to become off-by-one when editing (but fine if you only append?), and this will be only more common with long filenames being added. And triple-quote breaks editing entirely.

How does this address the security concern of filenames being detected and read when not wanted?
I don't have the same definition of "plenty" that you do. In any case, it is much, much less than in generations past.
> The OP mentions that reviewing the history would inform the discussion. You dismissed being informed and simply provided a truism - specifically accepted a truism common from oen side.

I'm sorry, but saying "review the history," without specifically referring to things that happened in history and why they are relevant today, is absolutely worthless and a copout. If you have a reason why voters can't use ID today, say it, this "educate yourself" crap is a weaselly way to get out of defending your position while looking down your nose at the same time.

You can't work without ID. Surely that's worse than not being able to vote, not being able to eat?
Hence the plan to have ten or so launches to refuel the top stage while it's still in orbit, a place that notably _is_ halfway to the moon's surface + the return trip to the earth.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Solar_sy...
Loss of sovereignty in particular was a fictional concern in regards to the EU, given the structure of the EU and the relatively high power of the UK within it. The degree to which the EU should be made more democratic is precisely the degree to which it remains exactly what leave campaigners said they wanted to replace it with: a traditional boring free trade agreement in the hands of negotiators appointed by the governments of the member states.

"High" migration likewise had nothing much to do with EU membership, as the government demonstrated precisely by following Brexit with, as you say, record high immigration.

One of the other famous big concerns Leave campaigners had was the cost, which famously became the £350 million a week on the side of a bus. This number was even called out as a falsehood at the time, but it was believed by enough to make a difference.

Remainers were unable to convince the majority that the benefits of EU membership was worth the cost, financial or otherwise, regardless.
This would assume that there is consensus on what the "United States" is. If a significant portion of the US Military feels differently, then a civil war is inevitable. This is what basically happened in the actual American Civil War, as a number of U.S. officers and soldiers formed their own forces (under their new Confederate government) to fight against the United States.
> and every PhD economist knows that inflation is connected to fiscal policy's influence on the monetary supply

Huh? I always thought this is common knowledge.
Yes, I said:

> And for clarity, yes, both sides participate in this charade of incivilities

Although I'm unaware of him asking for Hitler's generals so he could execute democrats, but I'm also not interested in participating in this back-and-forth exchange, as I dislike both administrations.
No way to get more sniper ammo on the Nintendo 64 version very frustrating
What if Apple made a Search Engine [video]
Go to any middle school in America and find who the popular kids are - its the hot, mean but funny ones, not the ones with smart ideas for change
Can anyone confirm the following?

I remember when Trump had Canada re-ratify Nafta that Canada had to waive the right to require Canadian data stay in Canada.

I know Canada signed the agreement but I am not sure if that requirement was ever put in legislation or whether the requirement was universal or just for US-based companies.
It literally says at the bottom of this ad this is not authorized by either candidates campaign. Nor does the ad even say the things you pointed out. But amazing try. I see you just made an account for this thread
There's no way you need $1B/year to properly fund the ongoing development and maintenance of an existing web browser. The Ladybird team is making an all-new browser from scratch for almost nothing. Just because Mozilla is wasting so much money doesn't mean you actually need that much to do the same job.
> and that's what gets reported in TV news.

That's the clue that it's a signal. If every merchant is mandated to drop the cost of goods to 1$, the measure becomes meaningless for this purpose, while people continue to trade more and more for the same amount of goods. The published values themselves are incidental and barter normalizes, detached from the edge effects, as the underlying cause remains.

https://search.brave.com/search?q=inflation+origin&source=de...
If any app is brainwashing people it's the zombie of twitter. Not tik tok.
Oh, a newer Battlezone. Not the original from 1980, the first 3D coin-op game.[1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlezone_(1980_video_game)
> It not even guaranteed that Trump will win the popular vote

Well the odds are 1000:1 on Polymarket, so if it's at all possible that's a great bet!
This might be related to CANCON rules. If TikTok can’t have Canadian offices then they can’t qualify for Canadian content.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_content
Well lhat is a weid website. Can unseet that anytime soon.
So your response confirms why I called it a wedge issue.

Most Americans don't like abortion laws the don't take into account the health of the mother. So that type of law becomes a wedge among Republicans.

Conversely, if a state passes a six week ban (Florida), that's going to draw out these distinctions among Democrats.

I'm not making a moral claim. I'm commenting on the politics of campaigning on it. I think politicians are advantaged at avoiding wedge issues and focusing on material concerns that affect the most people.
The built environment and mental health (2003)
"As ye sow, so ye shall reap"! errm, soz for the Biblical ref.

If everyone is spewing (sorry ... sharing) pics on TikTok, X and co then you won't stand out from the crowd. Unless those pics involve something too controversial.

I have an internet history that stretches back to Compuserve and I've always used my real name, which may or may not have been a good idea. Many years ago I decided not to give myself a silly pseudonym because I thought it would be futile and counter productive.

Cheers
wonky231
Yeah? Well, proper rewards make those savings and optimizations more common. Otherwise most people will do the work needed just to have work tomorrow.
I haven't, but the Ladybird browser devs are doing so at this moment, and they don't seem to need billions of dollars.