skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
you can’t reduce ecological principles to just rhetoric. less resources, more requirements = more strain. the more resources to share, the less impact of the same shared unit, the easier it is to dispense to whoever. sharing resources with others with those who share other properties is more acceptable to most. but this propensity is generally reduced with more resources to share. humans band into groups in competition for resources when they are scarce.

just as how people are getting triggered online more easily by displeasure, so they are triggered by the bad apples more than the invisible good ones. there’s more of good ones, but the larger their absolute number, the more resources are shared and the more bad apples there are, the more this sharing becomes problematic. the fewer shared properties there are, the less there is to dilute the bad-applehood.

abstracting away from this into a symbolic ideal (equivalence via property of “humanhood” and equivalence via property of “need” determined via capacity of empathy and Christian virtue) does no one any good and is experienced as a result of effacement of shared histories (roots). the idea that real present (ie, ahistorical) causative elements are always only just social or imperialist is ideology.
He doesn't need to do anything. Trump dies, he's prez. There are no more elections.
You're just taking every policy position and asserting it's surface-level.

We're now 8 years in of the elitists calling anyone who disagrees with them stupid, shallow, and racist.

You have learned nothing.
Bookies are a way better indicator than polls, I've opted to stop checking polls and only follow the bookies. Nearly all of them gave Trump at least a few percentage points of an edge, at a minimum. Now I'm not saying they're infallible, but they make or break their business by figuring these odds out, so there's a lot of skin in the game for them to be on point.
>And you'll still argue he did not "win" elections?

The Nazi party won elections, Hitler did not.

>>You know that Hitler was literally voted into power, right?

He was not. He lost the presidential election in 1932. He forcefully took the presidency after the Reichstag fire. He was appointed chancellor because the Nazi party won elections. He lost his. I can see where you think it is splitting hairs, but you specifically named Hitler and not the Nazi party. That might not have been what you meant to say, but it's what you said that I was refuting.

Also, Hindenburg didn't have to appoint Hitler, he could have chosen another from the Nazi party. He certainly didn't want to appoint Hitler, but some backroom negotiations that he wasn't a part of ultimately led to Hitler's appointment.

>So he was elected legally per the correct democratic process.

This is like saying the SCOTUS is elected because the President that appointed them was elected. They are not, they are appointed. Hitler himself never won an election.

FWIW, here are the 1932 election results:

Hindeberg 53.05%
Hitler 36.77%
Other Guy 10.16%

This would be considered an absolute blowout. Please don't feel like I'm scolding you, I really enjoy historical conversations, so thanks for this one.
Indeed. Mexicans, hispanics in general are insulted by him and his followers constantly, but it seems that this group brought the victory to him.

Who trump hasn’t insulted? billionaires[0] and saudis?

[0] though even Bezos is an exception.
Is this a home connection ?
How hard is it to send something there to give us a 24/7 feed of the planet from a fixed angle?
Pensions and taxes. I guess that's medicare in USA?
China will definitely not love the tariffs.

Criminal? What are you even talking about?
I'm well aware that the world in general is taking a hard right wing turn. However, it's not like I have a lot of other options.
Convicted felons cannot legally run for office
> So incredibly niche that who gives a fuck

And then you're surprised why people vote differently to you...
> Recession would imply that the market was completely incapable of adjusting to allocate resources correctly.

It doesn't have to be "complete", just a shortfall in demand, and of course eventually it ends. But if the market doesn't clear for a while, that's still people having to eat less for a while.

> Promoting a second-tier, legally-disenfranchised workforce isn't the win you seem to think it is.

Almost everything is better than farm work, which is why everyone ditches it as fast as they can. Even being a sweatshop worker is better. Nevertheless, the migrant farmworkers are doing it because it's better than their alternatives, presumably because they get paid better than doing it in their own country.

Btw, I'm not even thinking of especially poor countries here. Japan is a respectable first-world country but has surprisingly low wages and a bad exchange rate, and there are recent cases of Japanese people leaving for Australia to do work like this and making 2-3x what they can at home.

And of course back in Japan it feels like every convenience store worker these days is an immigrant from China, India or elsewhere.

This is fine, really. Productivity will increase over time, they'll save money over time, and their kids will have better jobs.
> Such modifications introduce a statistical signature into the generated text,

Great so now people have to be worried about being too statistically similar to an arbitrary "watermark".
Mate, we tried that for 20 years. And in especially in the later years, against better judgement and forgiving of A LOT of bad faith behaviour from the Russian government. And an outright dictatorship in the EU? lolno.

The EU wanted to embrace Russia, desperately so.

Many Europeans live with this notions "it's better if we all stop fighting and get along". That was certainly the prevalent attitude when I was growing up in the 90s in a post-cold war world. And they're right too, it is better for everyone. But some people aren't interested in what's better for everyone or even their country, they're only interested in what's best for them. Very sad a small group of assholes can just mess things up for so many people, but here we are.

I think that's the hard lessons many Europeans have learned over the last few years, or are in the process of learning (myself included).
A guy answered me in another comment where I was saying similar things about wages, and apparently it's not true, it's an interesting read (which I can't criticize or comment since I'm not knowledgeable in economics) https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/repost-why-immigration-doesnt-...
> Self-awareness itself is poorly defined.

No, not really. It has pretty standard definitions in philosophy and science, or it wouldn't have been able to be tested for over several decades. I suggest spending some time reading the wiki, it gives a pretty detailed overview.

The only point you have is about consciousness, and we don't need to understand the entire thing to understand parts of it or observe it, just like gravity.
https://www.propublica.org/article/josseli-barnica-death-mis...

https://www.propublica.org/article/nevaeh-crain-death-texas-...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Savita_Halappanavar
I didn't understand the focus on abortion as an issue for people. It's a legislative problem after Roe was overturned and it's not clear to me what the presidency would do to change that other than asking the other branches to take a federal action.
Gavin Newsom tried.
How does him addressing it to Christians makes anything better? Like, yes, hardcore Christians are his fans, because they want to get rid of abortions, liberals and generally resent anyone but themselves.
I have absolutely no expectation that Trump will actually order the military on the US populace, but even if he tried it matters whether the military would follow such an order. It could always happen, that's part of the reason I wish our federal government was drastically reduced and our standing military disbanded, but I simply can't think so little of our troops that they would actually do it.

That said, if somehow that did happen one day I fully expect to die by their gun. At that point that army becomes an invading force and I'd feel like I have no choice but to fight.
> "Oh but not like you, you're one of the good ones!"

I want to live with people who pull their weight and aren't an immediate financial burden on everyone else, yes.

If this is "one of the good ones" vs "one of the bad," so be it. If one is immediately looking to burden everyone else, I can see why one wouldn't want to "spend [their] time living with" folks who don't want to give them free shit.

> Because the only places that doesn't describe are those without a functioning government capable of collecting taxes.

We're not talking about tax collection, we're talking about how taxes are spent.

> You want me to migrate to ${your country} to boost the economy?

I don't care why or if you immigrate, but if you do, you will not have a net-negative financial impact on the population. Yes: there are freeloaders amongst the population as-is - this itself isn't a valid reason to import millions more.

We're already taking the cream of the crop - which is why H-1B and O-1s visas are a thing. People hiking across the Darién gap aren't magically going to become engineers and doctors.
It's been a long time! Glad you are interested. I gave a talk on it at the main NASDAQ computer site.

The null hypothesis is that some one point (a vector in R^n for the reals R and positive integer n) is from an independent, identically distributed set of random variables. The cute part was the use of the distribution property of tightness for the test statistic. The intended first application was for monitoring computer systems and improve on the early AI expert systems.
The very contraception republicans are in record repeatedly wanting to ban?

https://apnews.com/article/contraception-senate-abortion-bid...
That is one of infinite potential framings. It should be obvious it has served its usefulness and is no longer helpful and constructive.
This seems like a reasonably good analysis, but Trump's frequent campaign promise to deport all the "illegal immigrants" seems like it might deserve a prominent mention, even if only to explain why you don't think it will happen. During the campaign, Trump often defined "illegal immigrants" as 20 million people or more, some of whom have US residency visas that Trump thinks they shouldn't have gotten and therefore aren't "illegal" in the conventional sense.

If it does happen, it will be the largest "ethnic cleansing" in human history—bigger than the Yugoslavian migrations, bigger than the Armenian genocide, bigger than the Holocaust, bigger than the Holodomor, bigger than the US's previous forced removals of Native Americans. I say "ethnic" because it's primarily directed at people who are dark-skinned because of their Native American ancestry and driven by racism against them. It isn't directed against white illegal immigrants like Elon Musk and Melania Trump were.
I remember a notable Irish case where a mother died because the doctors refused to perform an abortion. Led to a constitutional change.

Woman dies after abortion request 'refused' at Galway hospital (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-20321741.amp).

There have been cases like this in America but I’m not going to look it up. Fortunately the other commenter did. Hope this changed your opinion :)
In well functioning democracy the government policy shouldn't flipflop constantly and president shouldn't have enough power to break everything.

In Europe, president's power is much more limited, there are more political parties and one party winning elections doesn't immediately change the country's policy to everything, even winning parties need to consider opinions of other parties. So overall country's policy more closely reflects the average opinion of the whole population instead of just the currently ruling party. Changes are much more slow and gradual and a single leader change doesn't immediately affect that much.

Politics are boring as they should be.
In emissions there is just China and then the US as a somewhat distant second. But to be honest the whole world is using China as their factory.

Europe and India are the regions that are actually surprisingly negligible. Africa and the rest of the developing world doesn't make a blip.
Pretty sure the South Vietnamese didn't share your point of view. Let's not forget it was North Vietnam that invaded.
Don't worry he will fix the economy.
Democratic party goes out of its way to look center, be accommodating and non confrontial. It just does not work.

I stand by "politician should not mean being lawless". US Supreme Court being pro lawless when it comes to GOP is just politics of US Supreme Court. It does not mean law should not matter or that trying to apply law is fighting dirty.
Less Taxes: So we would have a smaller government? That's good. Government already gets so much money and waste it.

Pensions: Maybe instead of relying on a pyramid scheme, people would need to manage their investments or have kids and raise them well so they take care of them later. Sounds like a win.
Sounds like America suffers from a collective psychosis.
Please take a day or ten to think your decision through as emotionlessly as possible. You could seriously affect your financial health if you make this decision based on feelings that may not align with reality.
I don't agree with this view. Saying that new generations are lazy compared to the previous ones is a complain as old as humanity itself, there are ancient writers that made the same complains centuries ago. Either you know their situation and you can provide some more detailed argument, or you are just assuming things you don't know.
Why do you assume that any other country wants you?
I agree that he probably wasn't talking about getting rid of voting altogether, but I'm still not sure on the logic of him getting the government into such good shape that Christians wouldn't need to vote anymore -- surely it would still be possible for the populace to vote in a terrible government that would undo all his improvements after his 4 years? But yeah, I suppose he could simply be saying that with his improvements, things would be stabilised and the stakes wouldn't be so high for the next election.
Only UBlock and a few custom extensions I built that massively improve my specific needs but are worthless to others. The beauty of browser extensions is exactly that: easy personal customization. And now with LLMs it's even easier!
It's extremely gross that I already see Democrats blaming the fact that Harris was a woman. They're going to play that card rather than admit that their message and agenda is falling flat. Trump should not be hard to beat. He has never been broadly popular. Democrats keep losing to him because they refuse to listen to anyone but their own echo chamber. They lost in 2016 and almost in 2020 and learned nothing.

Speaking of... this has firmly convinced me that deplatforming is the wrong answer. All it has done is create echo chambers. All I see is Democrats scratching their heads and blaming and fuming because they can't possibly understand why they lost. That's because they hang out in places like this or /r/politics and they've all moved to coastal cities with left-leaning political environments. If Harris had won in a landslide you'd see the exact same thing on the other side because they, too, are in echo chambers.

I did get one thing I was hoping for: a clear result. I was hoping whichever way it went it would be unambiguous to avoid a bunch of conspiracy theories and fighting.

Edit: one more takeaway: the traditional media is dead. Toast. They had no idea what was happening and all their takes are basically empty hand waving. They're absolutely clueless and out of touch and no longer have any influence.
I thing OP point is that if the trucker stopped working people and businesses will be impacted that day (before he gets replaced, easy with trucker, not with labour). The impact will be more direct and tangible way than, say, a CS researcher not showing up this morning.
I would totally use a Swift-style concise defer. Writing the idiomatic wrapper struct and implementing Drop is obtuse and repetitive. Both wrapper structs and the scopeguard macro approach have to be wasting compilation time.

I have a lot of FFI code paths that end up easier to understand if you use the C-style instead of the Rusty approach.

Readability and comp time should be important even in FFI code paths
The working title of the project is often public, e.g. on signs to the location shoot, and as such is often cryptic so that that the casual observer won't know that e.g. "Rory's First Kiss" is a Batman movie.
Sure, both are good examples of democracy being attacked. More broadly, I'd point to all the lies the public is fed to "nudge" us in whatever direction the political parties and lobbyists want. Its not much of a democracy if voters are asked to vote based on massive piles of bad information.
Old Buildings in Cambridge
Awesome! This is the list of companies that are registered by the government to employ highly educated migrants: https://ind.nl/en/public-register-recognised-sponsors/public...

A lot of them are looking for software engineers. Just go through the list one by one and keep applying.

However - the salaries in Europe are significantly lower than in the US. Be prepared for that.
Implementing Distributed Pooling in Elixir
> Separating children from parents at the border

That wasn't his main intention. It was to stop the flow of illegal immigration into the country. And after popular criticism, he reversed that policy and never enacted it again. That doesn't sound authoritarian/fascist to me. It sounds more like bending to the will of the people you govern.

> reverting hard fought women's right to their own body

And a large swath of the country believes abortion is murder. I guess for that, they are fascists in your eyes?

The term really has lost it's meaning and is just used by the Left to demonize the other side.

> The term fascist has been used as a pejorative,[74] regarding varying movements across the far right of the political spectrum. George Orwell noted in 1944 that the term had been used to denigrate diverse positions "in internal politics". Orwell said that while fascism is "a political and economic system" that was inconvenient to define, "as used, the word 'Fascism' is almost entirely meaningless. ... almost any English person would accept 'bully' as a synonym for 'Fascist'",[75] and in 1946 wrote that '"Fascism' has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies something not desirable."[76] Richard Griffiths of the University of Wales wrote in 2000 that "fascism" is the "most misused, and over-used word, of our times".[77]: 1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
Now try and add some evidence?
It's also a bad idea within the same language.

A C library returning a pointer to allocated memory and then expecting the caller to free that memory with a function outside the library (like calling stdlib free()) is just bad API design (because you can't and shouldn't need to know whether the library is actually using the stdlib alloc functions under the hood - or whether the library has been linked with the same C stdlib than your own code - for instance when the library resides in a DLL, or the library might decide to bypass malloc and directly use lower-level OS calls for allocating memory).

If you have a 'create' function in a C library, also always have a matching 'destroy' function.

On top of that it's also usually a good idea to let the library user override things like memory allocation or file IO functions.

...and of course 'general purpose' global allocators are a bad idea to begin with :)
Sure. They care about most of the stuff people have cared about for thousands of years.

They want to grow their families, low prices, government to stay out of their business. They want to grow their side jobs, like contracting or excavating or HVAC. They distrust smarty-pants paper pushers. They work side-by-side with a sudden increase of illegal immigrants.

None of this is simply surface level, at least not more so than any other human being. We're all just humans bro.
Trump also made calls to officials in other swing states he lost attempting to change the result. They weren't as public and damning, but had several of them been successful after all was said and done, it would have rigged the whole election.
This has already been covered. Any Dr too scared to read and interpret a law needs to give up their license because they’re pushing a political agenda.

If you don’t want to get pregnant it’s quite easy even if you don’t use contraceptives. Mistaken pregnancies need to go back to health class.
Netherlands is very friendly for tech worker immigration. I've known a person who did it, and heard quite a bit about it.

Or you could come here to Canada.

The problem is you're going to find the same attitudes outside of the US, just a few years behind.
So the election was about nothing objective?
I didn't think a joke about Poland starting world wars would need a /s, but here we are.
> Isis

Isis was already losing in 2017 after they lost Raqqa and Mosul. Trump played no part in it.

> Tax cuts

America is already stacked with an insane deficit and debts. Tax cuts don't see like a good thing in that situation.

> Booming economy

Yes, the economy he inherited from Obama and perpetuated by spending ever more public money and increasing the deficit.

> Remain in Mexico

This only concerns 35k people which is a laughable amount.

> Far lower illegal immigrantion

Not if you compare to the end of Bidens term.

We're also still waiting for that wall to happen. Another lie of course.

Republicans also voted against a bi-partisan bill to reduce immigration.

> If you listen to soundbites it sound like a circus

Fucking a pornstar while you're wife is at home with your newly born kid that might also play a role. But somehow the party of the nuclear family doesn't see a problem with that.
What are your thoughts on it? Why are the layoffs related?
Show HN: I'm building an AI tool that turns Design Systems into React components
Hi HN! Solo developer here. 10 days ago, I started building this after spending countless hours copying/pasting marketing sections and fighting to keep them consistent with our design system.

I wondered: "What if AI could understand our design system and generate React components that actually match it?"

Current progress (10 days in):
- Can generate hero sections that follow your design tokens
- Uses your actual component variants and styles
- Works with Next.js, Tailwind, shadcn/ui

It's very early days, but I'm excited to share it with other devs who:
- Are tired of rebuilding similar marketing sections
- Want their components to actually match their design system
- Need to ship marketing pages faster

Would love to hear from you if:
1. This resonates with your daily struggles
2. You'd like to try it out and share feedback
3. You have ideas that could make this genuinely useful

I'm building this solo and really want to understand if I'm solving a real problem before going deeper. Comment about your design system pains!

Goal: Save developers hours of repetitive work while maintaining design consistency
What are you talking about? The US has the 2nd heighest emissions behind China, almost double India's. The only countries higher than it per-capita are Canada, Australia and petro-states or tiny countries.

And China is already leading the world in moving to renewable technology, they are moving in the right direction (not entirely for altruistic reasons - it fulfils their ambitions of energy self-sufficiency).
One thing for sure, is you're part of the zionist brigade (you're easy to spot from a mile away, showing up in every comment thread to blatently support zionism).

Any US President, by design, can go against israel, because the US is a free nation not beholden to israel.
You can probably walk into Ireland with that resume.