skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This wonderful book pushed me to study computer science after mechanical engineering

- 20yrs later I can’t really see that being a software engineer's has anything in common subject wise with this masterpiece but I think the new current AI age and and GPT has so lent many new observations that lead me back this masterpiece

- too many software engineers are puzzle solvers and creative builders, focused only on iterations of code and solving business problems not enough philosophers in field in my opinion to give a wholistic view - so there is a heavy undercurrent of artisan worker ethic in the software world (rightly so given the nature of the work) but it also tends to look down at academia and philosophy and not enough deeper thought on implications that everything in the world is Turing compatible and that our world is an amazing and wonderful place
Trump signed the first relief package, $2 trillion worth, at the end of March 2020. That wasn't "most", but it was a significant chunk of it.
Sometimes it is more important to work on proving you have a viable product and market to sell it in before you optimise.

On the outside we can’t be sure. But it’s possible that they took the right decision to go with a naïve implementation first. Then profile, measure and improve later.

But yes the hole idea of running a headless web browser to get run JavaScript to get access to a video stream is a bit crazy. But I guess that’s just the world we are in.
> I feel like I've been listening to a very different Trump than you have. Most of what he says involves demonizing various groups of people, cozying up to dictators, or putting his political opponents in jail. His rallies are about stoking outrage and fear.

It sounds more like you've been listening to what the news tells you Trump is.

"cozying up to dictators" is exactly the language used by MSNBC, CNN, CBS, et al. Putting his political opponents in jail is what his opposition tried.

The withdrawal plan is different from the execution, especially when only the high-level is followed. That is on Biden.

> Every concrete proposal of his (not that he has many) that I've heard will bring us back on the inflation train, increase the deficit, reverse our declining reliance on fossil fuels, and increase income inequality even further. And on top of that he'll even further paralyze the federal government. Which is of course the conservative agenda in a nutshell: dismantle the federal government and let the states decide their fates, except where they want to impose their "values" on blue states.

Again, this just sounds like what certain media tells you. I have never heard Trump say his goal is to "paralyze the federal government".
Inflation is technically defined as an increase in the price level. You'll find the term defined in this way in every single economics textbook.
"You’re supposed to make only two quarts of Kool-Aid from a package, but he always made a gallon, so his Kool-Aid was a mere shadow of its desired potency. And you’re supposed to add a cup of sugar to every package of Kool-Aid, but he never put any sugar in his Kool-Aid because there wasn’t any sugar to put in it.

He created his own Kool-Aid reality and was able to illuminate himself by it." -Brautigan
Amusingly/sadly JD Vance could tell you exactly why Trump wins. The secret is empty promises. In an unfortunate way, it’s a kind of empathetic approach.

It’s why he called Trump the “opioid of the masses”[1]. You just make promises even when you know it’s total BS. But at least people are feeling heard.

I think the average voter really doesn’t want to have a nuanced discussion where they learn about the problems that they’re experiencing. They just want to hear someone say “I got this”… even if they don’t.

[1] https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/07/opioid-...
That's a good write-up with a standard solution in some other spaces. Shared memory buffers are very fast too. It's interesting to see them being used here. Nice write up. It wasn't what I expected: that they were doing something dumb with API Gateway Websockets. This is actual stuff. Nice.
Obviously a legally protected name is best. But "GPT" will end up morally protected even without legal protection.

"This AI is dumb. Bob, did you get all this research from a fake ChatGPT cos you're too cheap to buy the real thing?"
Doom.

Doomscrolling, doomposting ... weren't those words born in the social media world?

Negativity attracts attention. Negativity makes money on the Internet. Ironically, here on Hacker News, there is probably a sizeable cohort of programmers and managers who opened this Pandora's Box for the entire mankind.

I don't blame them; they didn't know how the brave new world would turn out. But this is just one of the many consequences. People perceive the world as worse than it actually is. Because all they see on their smartphones are bad news and anxious takes.
>Not only is it contingent on your intermediaries actually responding to your packet with the diagnostic information you want, it assumes that the diagnostic response will also be able to get back to you.

Isn't most of the diagnostic information just stuff that's part of TCP/IP anyway?
He was convicted by a Jury not any left leaning judge or whatever.
exactly its all messaging. dems suck as messaging and kamala was not the right person to deliver messages because she avoided interviews, conversations, etc. Dems needed someone who would go on any show at any time like Bernie does.
> You’re ignoring the mass-transmission losses of moving heavy panels to the Moon.

I passed on that because both options require a lot of mass transfer -- either solar panels or microwave antennas.
That's information about the market, not about the asset. Good luck to you too.
No, I tuned a model on my (unique) table data, which does not take long, since the model is small.

My model seemed in my tests at least to hold up good enough, since its only used as a preselect to find "good enough" candidates to use Levenshtein later on.

But yes, a universal model (maybe a fine-tuned transformer / embedding model) might be better, but i did not have the time (and knowledge) to build one yet.
Yeah Trumps spending was bipartisan but Biden unilaterally poured fuel on the fire after Covid.
Maybe they will stop pursuing anti growth policies? Nah that’s crazy
What?

Trump pulled out of the Iran deal, which pushed Iran to redevelop its nuclear program. Anti-war what?

Trump signed the abraham accords with Saudi/Israeli appeasement, which Israeli intelligence notes pushed Hamas to attack on oct 7 and launch this war. Anti-war what?

Trump withheld military aid from the Ukraine until Zelensky provided dirt on Joe Biden, which was critical for Ukraine's defense against Russia's aggression in Eastern Ukraine, leaving Ukraine weaker and invaded in full two years later, anti-war what?

Trump has threatened to jail his opponents and go after the press, free speech what?

Republicans have banned books, want to ban teachers and fire massive amounts of civil servants, free speech what?

Elitist party, Trump is literally a billionaire who is supported by other billionaires, some of whom he will put in his cabinet. His biggest two policy positions are tax cuts for big corps (elitist) and deportations of the lowest class of people in the US. But Dems are elitist?

I don't think there is much that they've switched on actually in the last election, other than Republicans convincing the working class that they're their party, something republicans have done on and off for many decades.
This is more likely just to help with incomplete/mistyped urls. As in gogle.com -> google.com
King CPU. Time to build a new desktop PC!
> LATAM has nothing in common with the Western thinking. You are people of passion, no matter who Argentinians vote in always ended in disaster.

Be careful, your ignorance is showing.

On a more serious note, you clearly don't know what you are talking about.

"People of passion". Give me a fucking break. So, Latin Americans are emotion-driven robots. Great. Stop getting your fake facts from movies and leftist media for goodness sake.

> Milei if far right, and as big an idiot as your lefties.

Your ignorance makes me want to vomit.

Go live in an environment with 50% unemployment, massive government overreach and 250% annual inflation (after years of crippling inflation). Then come back and read your comment to understand what you sound like.
They didn't change anything; chatgpt.com is still the main domain. chat.com simply redirects to chatgpt.com.
It's weird to see people say stuff like this. Like, are you completely ignorant of the history of US initiated regime change around the world? Do you not find it at all plausible? The US has a very long history of doing this very sort of thing[1]. Do you think the three letter agencies have just been sitting on their hands in recent decades? I just don't get how people can engage in such willful ignorance.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_r...
Intel sued over Raptor Lake voltage instability
Comparisons to Weimar Germany are ridiculous because the state of the two countries are vastly, VASTLY different. Nevermind the fact that we're also in a different, much more interconnected and mixed world than back then.

On the one hand you have a once-proud and powerful state recovering from the most devastating war humanity has ever waged (by that point) that it lost in, which subsequently forced them into paying back massive reparations, sanctions and economic and military limits imposed on it by the victors of said war. Of course a charismatic, populist leader who gives the resentful nation a boogeyman to fight against is going to win.

On the other you have the de facto #1 world power with the most cartoonishly powerful military on the planet that has their fingers involved in every single pie on the planet, which was founded on the principle of democracy some 200 years ago, with strong safeguards put in place to prevent the exact thing that happened with the Weimar republic.

Even pretending like the Weimer Republic's military was anything even resembling what the US military is is ridiculous.
Perhaps they will soon be able to reach the first step in their HLS timeline (initially scheduled to be done in 2022 by having an orbital launch test).
There really isn't more security and integrity with in person elections versus mail.

Jimmy Carter spoke about this, literally in some town the sheriff watches you vote and chucks it into the trash if you didn't pick their candidate.
Did they originally NOT run things on the same machine? Otherwise the WebSocket would be local and incur no cost.
We need a national voting holiday.
> How do people look past this

Why should we discriminate against justice impacted individuals?
Thanks to the wonderful SpaceX engineers who are actually responsible for the company’s achievements. What they’ve been accomplishing recently never ceases to amaze me.
And the OS is terrible, so it's practically useless for me.
I'm not sure what you mean by that? The democratic candidate lost, and by no small margin. I'm a democrat. It's unambiguously our loss.
This was bad enough that it's been taken down now.
I'm a "supporter" and I know exactly what he means. Means he'll fix all the voting shenanigans so that illegals can't vote and so that democrats can't "rig" and stack the election like last time. See? Not so much a hateful whistle as it is understanding your supporters, what's important to them, and appealing to that with your own words.
Even at suborbital velocities, putting debris into the path of an existing satellite that is traveling at orbital velocity is enough to trigger a cascade.
Good UX is a moat. Otherwise we'd be in the year of the Linux desktop.
This is an astute comment; we are in the social media era of elections, probably have been since 2016.

Policy Vibes > Policy Content
The human word "Chat" seems too generic to be a good brand name too. I think it would be a dumb move to rebrand right now.
The US economy is doing great for the people already with money. Everyday people who need to buy groceries and gas are getting pinched just as hard as ever.
> NATO in Ukraine would have been a strategic noose from which Russia would never escape.

Reminder: Ukraine was (strongly) against NATO membership before Russia invaded in 2014.

NATO threat is a red herring that Russia likes to dangle in front of the western countries to cover up its expansionist agenda. The only reason it's "afraid" of NATO is NATO can make that agenda much harder to pull off.
A professor my wife had in her feminist studies class confided in my wife that she enjoyed having her in class (my wife leans conservative), because she (the professor) had gotten tired of the bubble. Her professor was raised lower-middle class and spent many years in trucking before entering academia, and was just tired of the constant echo chamber that academia has become. This woman seems to have done the opposite. Good for her.

For me personally, despite being in tech in a well paying job, at my church and at various volunteer groups I'm part of, I am exposed to people of all backgrounds. And of course, growing up middle class and seeing how my friends and family behaved, I feel way more comfortable among what I consider 'normal' people. It's like two different worlds at work versus in person. Luckily, I'm now at a chipmaker where people seem more level-headed. Something about having to interact with physical constraints makes people more moderate I think. The SW startup world is so far off the rails, I found it difficult to relate.
It's not a partisan argument. It's a fact of the mechanics of US Presidential elections.

If DJT ends up with a final popular vote advantage, though, it'll be the first time that a Republican has taken the Oval Office AND the popular vote since 1988.
> Try the Trump/populist playbook on the topic: identify the problem,

And ideally put the blame on people who don't have any/much political or economic power within the country, like immigrants. Us vs them. "If we just get rid of 'them' everything will be fine"
> Microsoft Editor - Grammarly but better?

It harvests even more data from you than Grammarly. So, not better. Use LanguageTool instead.
Reminiscent of "Wired" magazine, in the era of wireless / mobile taking over.
Correct, they're misreading what I'm saying. But the 6 year old thing isn't a hypothetical. There are plenty of documented cases of 6 year olds being transitioned by abusive parents and doctors. There needs to be a line somewhere. Right now, in many jurisdictions, there is no line.
In practice, all languages that use digraphs and trigraphs don't use distinct Unicode codepoints for them, generally speaking (and Unicode specifically marks those codepoints as legacy, so this is an officially blessed practice). The reason why they exist is because one of the explicit goals of Unicode as originally designed was to be able to roundtrip many existing national encodings lossless. So digraphs that were already in the national encodings for whatever reason ended up in Unicode as legacy, while those that were not, did not.
They won't learn because ultimately this isn't painful for them, just their constituents. They're fine.
Totally reasonable question. This is the first rocket ever that will (assuming further success) land in its entirety back on the launch pad, refuel, and go back to orbit the same day.

Imagine that every time an airliner landed its cockpit was destroyed and you had to build a new one. A fully reusable airplane would be a transformational improvement. That's the level of achievement we're talking about here.
Let me phrase that better, why wouldn't they need to vote, since that is what he implied.

Why wouldn't they need to vote?
The Nintendo DS was "interesting" relative to the GBA (if you ask me), but still had native back-compat.

I agree that the Switch 2 will likely be "more of the same", but I don't really see how that relates to back-compat?
So why buy this generation and not wait unless your computer broke and you NEED Intel?
Thanks! I will have a read. Looks very interesting.
> plant-based meats

They are processed food. I'm under no illusion that they are healthy.

I won't say I've never had them, but I generally turn my nose up at them and stick with real animal flesh or traditional vegetarian food.
It exists to give outsized influence to small, rural (and, at the time, slave-holding) states -- which is also true of the Senate.
Banter is wonderful when you are part of the in group, especially if you are the dominant player in that group. But it is often used by members of the in group to marginalise those outside and to maintain the dominance of the leading players in the in group.
It’s not so crazy, Biden was more appealing to moderates.
Totally agree that this is becoming the standard "reference architecture" for this kind of pipeline. The only thing that complicates this a lot today is complex inputs. For simple 1-2 page PDFs what you describes works quite well out of the box but for 100+ page doc it starts to fall over in ways I described in another comment.
Czechia was hit by pretty bad inflation too, after decades of very low inflation rates. Our current government will likely lose the election in a year as a consequence.

Being in office when inflation hits is a recipe for electoral disaster, regardless of actual culpability, which, in this interconnected world, is likely lower than perceived.
> This is not an ad

> thanks for your engagement

lol
Reading the comments, I think the value that they have is: charisma. Another comment wrote about Paul Graham's essay.

You like 'em, you vote 'em into power.

It is what it is.
my guess is either that video they get use some proprietary encoding format (js might do some magic on the feed) or it's because it's latency optimized stream that consumes a lot of bandwidth
I'm a native English speaker and I didn't get the "pun" for years. Almost a decade, even.

"App" does not rhyme with "Up".
>Like I said, it was a dark moment.

The parent pointed out that Trump promised the same thing again - so not a dark moment, but a dark pattern. Very dark. There's not much darker than overturning the rule of law and creating civil unrest.

>"Democrats are the only moral choice"

I agree with you that Democrats are not somehow unusually moral, but I don't think this is the lie you are portraying it as (or exaggeration? It's unclear what your criticism is exactly). Plenty of people have been given plenty of concrete examples indicating that the Trump camp contains a significant portion of people who espouse unusually immoral ideologies. Maybe they're wrong, but they don't have to do mental gymnastics to arrive at that conclusion in an intellectually honest manner. And, as you rightly point out, there are effectively only two parties.

>I would repeat the second paragraph

Regarding that, then:

>if [women] don't vote they may lose their ability to vote. This is ridiculous.

I've heard Trump supporters say they think women shouldn't vote dozens of times - on the social media platforms you claim are (or were at the time) lacking conservative voices. The notion isn't ridiculous. It's unlikely. But when it comes to threats to the most foundational rights, "unlikely" isn't good enough for the voter's mind.

>Whether you like him or not he is the candidate of the other party. There is no democracy without the other party.

Democrats largely don't take this stance beyond petty disrespect like "not my president" and demanding recounts in very close regions. Trump supporters, on the other hand, explicitly do take this stance when the other candidate wins, as you, again, have already admitted.

>Elon Musk saved the day by buying Twitter

Twitter moderation under Musk is at least as right-leaning as it was left-leaning prior. That is to say, somewhat. What Musk did do was declare the word "cis" a slur, broadly. A word I used to describe myself and my wife in another comment, because it was relevant and correct (the usual comparisons are the words "Jew" or "gay").

Republicans haven't been anywhere near absent from social platforms for 15 years. Underrepresented, maybe. However, social platforms bring out the ever-living pettiness of politics on both sides, and the conservative flavor of pettiness is naturally more likely to break even the most politically-neutral moderation rules (or be "shouted down", by whatever definition you want for that) on social media platforms, because it is more anti-social than the liberal flavor of pettiness.
Many people in the US believe that the target country is the one who pays the tariffs, and don't understand that they pay for them, at the cash register.
Anger is a helluva drug.
real question is what is friedberg doing hanging out with these frauds
The issue is that she's part of the current administration and the current dominant party. That's all people care about. They look at who's in charge and vote the other way. It's really that simple.
> To let states decide how it should be handled, rather than a federal mandate. Allowing different possibilities to be tested - maybe in some states it will become completely illegal

Why should one get to play Laboratory of Democracy with women's lives?
Chat.com
I don't think this is accurate when you consider the "addons" that were pushed as part of these initiatives. Further you can look at the past few months drastic decreases due to presidential initiatives to further bolster the rights argument that the didn't even need these initiatives and could have just enforced existing laws.

That's the problem. The solutions are already on paper, just not enforced. Much like theft in California which appears to have had a drastic shift back with this election too.

People was consistency and enforcement regardless of party.
Democrats had a trifecta but couldn't get DC and Puerto Rico statehood or voter right protections because of Blue Dog members of the party. They lost a critical election that led to some of the worst gerrymandered maps against them while most of their own gerrymandering attempts were overturned. Republicans now control the senate, house, judicial, and executive branch and can cement their power forever.

If you don't believe me just look at Mississippi. A state where demographics alone should've made it between blue and purple. Instead, 15% of all Black adults in that state are not allowed to vote. Similarly, in Florida, 10% of all adults cannot vote. Voters passed an initiative by direct democracy to allow felons to vote, but DeSantis just blocked it anyways and the courts, which he controls, backed him.

Democrats, despite winning the popular vote in all but 2 elections since 1988, are pretty much completely out of power
So a couple untruths, and something ambiguous. Evangelicals have been a key voting bloc for years (I don't want to say Christians, because there are a huge number of Christian democrats too). If anything they're key to GOP success in the recent past.

But you kinda skipped past what I was asking. How and what do those voters think he was going to fix for good? And do they perceive themselves as being politically inactive except for just this once?

It sounds like you're just giving him a pass because hey, all politicians lie to get people to vote. At that point, why do we even care what a politician says, whether we agree with them or not?
Vercel Makes Changes to Next.js to Simplify Self-Hosting
They couldn't blame Trump for printing the money because nearly all of them voted for the stimulus.

Blaming Trump for printing money when you voted on it, too, is a bad strategy.