skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
i wish there were more resources for caregivers tending to family with mental health issues.

unlike a physical illness or disabilities where there are clearly defined caregiving tasks (e.g., helping with mobility, bathing, administering medication), it's primarily emotional/mental burden where you can't just ask a stranger to stop by and help out for a couple days (not to say that there isn't a mental/emotional burden with all forms of caregiving).

couple that with the social stigma many people feel about mental health issues, you will most likely have to fulfill your caregiving role secretly in the privacy of your home so it isn't possible to find a community of other people in a similar situation.

it's overwhelming and isolating. and when you do start looking for resources on how to take care of yourself or searching for some community where you could vent and feel understood... all you'll find are lists of tips for "here's how to help your loved one start therapy". i know they mean well, but it just reinforces the idea that you were wrong to have been thinking about your own needs and you really just need to be more selfless and more dedicated to supporting your loved ones.
due to amount of regulations it is hard to start business in europe and thus they mainly have old business (like BMW etc.) that are in decline. but innovation happens in other places.

There are two exceptions though - France (partially) and Sweden.
I don't understand this perspective.

Russia is gettin North Korean troops to fight for them because they are losing so bad, but Russia is also an aggressive superpower hell-bent on invading even more countries with far better defenses than Ukraine.

This isn't accounting for Russia's disastrous demographics problem. The biggest reason they are moving so slowly is because they can build new artillery, but are demographically forced to do everything they can to minimize casualties.

It also isn't accounting for Russia trying to get a permanent peace deal 2 months into the conflict. That's not the behavior of a country bent on conquest.

Finally, I can't take people seriously when they are basically asserting that Russia believed they could take over all of Eastern Europe with just ~200,000 troops. When Ukraine changed from regime toppling to an actual war, Russia was caught with their pants down. They had to hire Wagner and draft prisoners to buy time to start pushing soldiers through training. If they'd been planning some large invasion campaign, they would have started serious troop training a handful of years prior and have millions of already-trained troops.
Yeah that's why I called Netanyahus actions fascist.
I'm a data scientist, and my impression is that the growth of data science as a profession over the last ~decade has enabled companies to price more efficiently than they used to. That in turn was enabled by technical improvements like cheaper storage and compute and commoditized data infrastructure. I don't have a strong opinion on how much of the inflation this explains, but directionally I'm very confident that companies have gotten significantly more efficient at pricing over that time period, and pretty confident that that would lead to price increases for a lot of businesses.

Supply chain and price shocks during COVID probably accelerated this trend quite a bit - McDonald's would have eventually figured out that the profit-maximizing price of a burger is closer to $4 than $1, but COVID shocks gave it license to raise prices much faster. The good news is that I think of this largely as a one-time shock: once companies have perfectly set profit-maximizing prices, there's no room for more price-optimization-driven inflation, except to the extent that consumers get richer or less price-sensitive over time.

Quoting Matt Levine, "a good unified theory of modern society’s anxieties might be 'everything is too efficient and it’s exhausting.'"
Now they're fascist? I don't think you know what the definition of fascism is...

(sounds like you're repeating a talking point of the left of calling everyone on the right a fascist..)
Because it was bought by billionaires.
Since they aim to support every meeting platform, they don’t necessarily even have the codecs. Platforms like Zoom can and do use custom video formats within their web clients.

With that constraint, letting a full browser engine decode and composite the participant streams is the only option. And it definitely is an expensive way to do it.
An open mind is one of the most valuable qualities a person can have. For some reason, most people are unable to fake being open minded when discussing politics so it's a good litmus test.

So consider the following perspective. We've endured Trump once, with mediocre results. The world didn't end, and meanwhile he did not accomplish much of what he promised while putting on a clown show. But this time, I'm optimistic about the potential for our country for the first time. Not because of Trump, but because of some of his likely cabinet appointments. Elon Musk in particular.

Whether you want to acknowledge it or not, our government is headed for a debt crisis. Things will get slowly worse (inequality will increase while the government devalues the dollar to service its debt), but eventually, the crisis will come to a head and the government will be unable to service its debts without a massive devaluation ala Argentina, Weimar Republic, etc. We got a small taste of this after the pandemic response.

There is no conceivable way that an ordinary politician from either party could dismantle or even slow the growth of the immense bureaucratic rot bleeding our country dry. Nor can Donald Trump, as evidenced by his failure to "drain the swamp" last time.

But one of the few people who could is likely to get a major government efficiency appointment.

That's what I'm optimistic about. Not Trump, but the fact that he is now surrounded with competent people with good ideas. Prior to him being elected, a true national debt reckoning was inevitable at some point in my lifetime. Now, there is some non-negligible chance of pushing it past my lifetime or reversing it altogether.
Hug text: The website is temporarily unable to service your request as it exceeded resource limit. Please try again later.
Inflation happens when money supply increases more than the value of the goods that you can purchase with that money supply. It isn't about needs, but things that can be bought, especially those with limited supplies like housing.
And, open source code can only be interpreted or judged by specialists. So the specialists become the people with significantly more power.

In the end it all comes down to money buying power, attracting more money. Musk buys votes and pays republicans, who make him richer. Same for big pharma/oil/tabacco.

Probably there is a natural law that finally keeps the Pareto inequality in place?
Or just the last in a series of similar shilling!

You're in explicit violation of site guidelines. Recommend you stop:

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
This is kinda the point I'm trying to make, that in the current environment most people want a leader who isn't afraid of lying to make a point. That is in my perspective what vision mostly is. When things are in crisis, like 2020, people were probably more comforted by boring competence.

For instance, in terms of visionary leadership, I think Musk fans mostly don't care that he lies about when a product will be delivered. They want to believe so to speak.
Clever usurpation of expectations _and_ artistic.
this really makes me regret doing nothing like this when I recently had my passport photos taken.
> What kind of targeting advertising am i getting from apple as a user of their products?

https://searchads.apple.com/

https://support.apple.com/guide/iphone/control-how-apple-del...

In the App Store and Apple News, your search and download history may be used to serve you relevant search ads. In Apple News and Stocks, ads are served based partly on what you read or follow. This includes publishers you’ve enabled notifications for and the type of publishing subscription you have.
Change isn't necessarily bad, but rapid change usually is. And reproduction rates that more than halve the population per generation is an extremely rapid change.
I thought one of the whole points behind separate (non-mono)repos was to help enforce loose coupling and if you came to a point where a single feature change required PRs on 4 separate repos then that was an indicator that your project needed refactoring as it was becoming to tightly coupled. The example in the article could have been interpreted to mean that they should refactor the functionality for interacting with the ML model into it's own repo so it could encapsulate this aspect of the project. Instead they doubled down on the tighter coupling by putting them in a monorepo (which itself encourages tighter coupling).
It would just be a useful reminder of that fact. Remember: you're trying to sell voting to someone who doesn't normally vote. It's easier to sell it as being a one-off thing versus sell them on voting in all future elections.
Yes. All reviewers test it with a 4090 in 1080p to show how it is the best. With most games and 4k, barely a difference as most (3d) games are not CPU bound (some are).

More interesting looking at phoronix is that, that the vcache helps a little with compilation performance (vs 9700). But having 4 more cores (9900) is much better than having vcache for compiling.
Step 1: Blame people who don't look like you

Step 2: Become dictator/king

Step 3: ???

Step 4: Profit

---

History repeats itself.
> ... update the pointers ...

Pretty sure ARM and x86 you would be seeing on AWS does have strong memory ordering, and has atomic operations that operate on something the size of a single register...
What's your issue with EKS? I operate several very simple and small single-tenant clusters, and I have to touch the infrastructure only once a year for updates
I was confused why so many of the photos had a random fish it them until I realized that was the cursor…
Inflation historically was a measure of the change in money supply. They co-opted the same word to instead measure an entirely different concept, the change over time of a basket of goods.

In my book that's very similar to taking a distance measurement and reusing the word to instead measure a totally different concept, volume. Curious how its different though, I may just be tripping myself up here.
Bernie Sanders just put it perfectly:

>It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working class people would find that the working class has abandoned them.

>While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change.

>And they’re right.

Anyone here who is still confused about this election result need only unplug their fingers from their ears and open their eyes.
> It will require on the order of 10 launches to fuel up one moon lander in orbit

Require, or just make comfortable? Saturn V had the lift capacity of "only" a couple of Falcon Heavies, but was enough to carry astronauts, a car, a lunar lander with enough fuel to take off, and a command module.
Why not? Install trafeik or any other load balancer, setup two services, and restart one after one.
In my past life, I was a chef. I owned a restaurant in Ireland. I only purchased the cheapest Chinese truffles money could buy. Why? People only want to taste the oil anyway. I've worked with high end white truffles and the flavor is very vague. I'd estimate that I've eaten several hundred grams of white truffle.
Oh, they will. Culture wars only go so far when your wallet is _truly_ affected.
Immigration is a net good. Even if there's now suddenly a bunch of unskilled labor vacancies, what makes you think American workers even want those jobs in the first place? What makes you think those companies can afford American workers? People aren't out of a job because some immigrant took theirs. We know this through hard data, not vibes.

We don't need to cut foreign military aid to fund childcare in the US. Reforming entitlements would get us there with more leeway and without ripping the rug out from under our allies.

Lowering taxes is a good thing, and that's about the only area you would find me in agreement upon.
It’s amazing that rather than recognize that the rich have too much and we too little, we’d rather organize around them hoarding so much wealth that the population declines.

Like we could not imagine a fairer distribution that would incentivize more people to have children in a positive fashion.

I think we might even go the other direction - circumscribe the rights of women directly to increase the birth rate, Handmaids Tale style.
This is a technology problem. Media technology (radio, recordings, television, and movies) has essentially killed live performance of all kind compared to what it was once like. Bars and hotels that used to rely on gig musicians can now play a Spotify playlist over the speakers. Repertory theatres once existed in every small and medium sized city in the country, each supporting several actors earning salaries sufficient to raise a family—all wiped out by television.

It would have once been unthinkable for even a small city of <=100,000 people to lack multiple live entertainment options 7 days a week. No more—we’re all at home, watching our particular chosen thing, listening to our particular chosen album, playing our own chosen game.

Some will claim this has been an advancement. “How lame,” they say, “it must have been to have to go to the Local Entertainment Venue and just listen to whatever act was on that night. Nowadays I can listen to Acid Techno Super Hop, my particular chosen favorite, as much as I want.” But the losses in communal behavior have been significant. Most critical is the disappearance of dance. Dance is a fundamental human behavior, stretching back to Paleolithic times. It is nowhere to be seen in many cities today, because no one has any occasion to do it except weddings, at which it is very common now to stand around awkwardly after the bride and groom have fumbled through some rehearsed step.
Yes, but for the electorate to blame the current party for the last 40 years is irrational.
Sounds like this is academic to you; it's visceral to me.

"If only every single person would..." is not how you create policy where people are actually free.
Or perhaps earlier and closer to the heart of USA's citizens, 300 years ago, there was no need for rail lines and trains.
Arguably, Hillary 2016 was the best candidate by far. Nobody thought Trump was better until he won. If you say she had baggage, it was nothing to Trump's baggage, but there's a huge double standard based on gender.
> In part, maybe. And at the very end of the list of proposal, (...)

Not in part.

And now you voted on the guy whose only concrete economic policy is to massively drive up inflation by imposing tariffs.
Well the Republicans also spent a good amount of time yelling that the Democrats were yelling about those things, which is perhaps part of the reason your friend thinks the Dems only care about those issues.
> Typically, plasticizers are not chemically bound to the polymer, but can leak out over time and thus can affect humans and other organisms.

I wouldn't risk heating food with any kind of plastic.
I've never actually seen anyone use "inflation" to refer to cost of living. Most economists use the term to talk about price increases of a subset of goods, but that isn't directly measuring cost of living.
The reason it doesn't make sense to people like him (and me) is that we look at all the times he promised to release the health care plan, the January 6 incident, the calls to states to "find" votes, the constant complaining about rigged elections, the constant complaining about basically EVERYTHING he doesn't like, and more, and we don't see how anyone can overlook that. He never answers policy questions clearly. He doesn't understand tarriffs will raise our prices. He thinks RFK should be in charge of HHS. He wants to shut down TV networks that criticize him.

When I ask folks why those things don't matter, I either get "what about So-and-so," or "I don't believe that," or they just blow off the question without an answer. I even went to the Ask a Conservative sub on Reddit and asked why people think millions of noncitizens are voting in elections, and I got yelled at, called naive, and told that some local municipalities allow non-citizen votes in local elections so therefore they can vote federally too.

That said, I'd LOVE to know why none of the things Trump says or does dissuades his voters. Truly, because I really do not understand. I don't want to argue, or to try to convince you you're wrong, I would love to know why those things don't matter and you think Trump is a force for good.
Several other countries have independent electoral commissions running elections, as opposed to elected politicians. It is much easier for voters to trust the people running elections when they are required by law to be apolitical.

Look for example at the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC)
Thanks for sharing this. I used to care for my grandma back home (Alzheimer’s), but the financial burden is brutal. I moved countries so I could be able to afford caring for her but ended up leaving the large part of the physical work for my mom and sister. Thankfully I can now afford to support her financially much more, including paying for a dedicated nursing home nearby my moms.

I’m 35 now and keep wondering how future is gonna be as I have no kids and no desire in having them (also not wishing them a life where they would have to care for me)

I’m trying to keep my health up now and dedicating more time for it so I can hopefully hold the fort.

I wish you the best for you and your father.
They’re literally trying to find out when they exclaim that question.

To me this seems a pretty clear case of inflation=“punish the incumbent” and also Biden spread out the pain of covid recovery instead of making red states bear the burden. Kamala promised more of the same, including lots of investment into rural and red areas that aren’t gonna vote for her anyway. Result? 10-15 million blue voters stayed home this cycle. Trump turned out his entire base.

Just pontificating…
Americans had what's called a vibecession where they universally thought the economy was bad, but then answered every question about their own finances by saying they were good. The implication was they thought it was bad for everyone else, just not them, so that's mostly on the media's negativity bias.

There was some hangover effect from inflation, although of course that's going to get worse now.
Yours is much better, exactly how I envisioned it to be
I literally said if he takes Donbas and Crimea, yes that's worth it. You've failed to present any evidence he could take anything else except Transnistria which has already been defacto independent and considered under Russian occupation since 2022.
Visualizing binary files with ImHex's DSL, the "pattern language"
Both the Israel and Ukraine wars started under Biden. It's hotly debated how it would have all played out under Trump. An no, I'm not a Trump supporter. But context and public perception is important. And understanding how and what Trump did to radically shift the Republican party is important to future predictions and restoring balance. This is my primary claim as to why Harris lost. Democrats have drifted too far from the truth on the ground with large swaths of Americans. And yes, Republicans have done the same, but not to the same extent which is why they won. I hope the Democratic party can recalibrate and learn from the mistakes for next time.
People in these situations should learn about codependency.

Although most people think of codependency in terms of unhealthy love relationships, it is also common for caregivers.

The idea is NOT that you should stop caring, or walk away.

It is sort of adopting a "healthy neutrality" frame of mind, and give/function well.
I’ve always thought to go unkempt and unshaven.

This is so that I would be recognized from my passport if I was detained for several months in a sketchy country.
> can pay for childcare for every child in the US easily.

It can also pay for unicorns and rainbows, what makes you believe "paying for childcare" has ever been a part of Trump/Republican agenda?
The fallacy here is that US industries will even be able to compete with 200% tariffs.

They won't, and they can't, and they certainly can't do it immediately. It takes decades to build up the manufacturing efficiency and processes to compete with China. We lost all of it.

We will continue to buy from China because it will STILL be cheaper. And your goods will be 3x more expensive, and that's the best-case scenario for a lot of goods.
because then the press wound still refer to it as twitter.

who calls alphabet alphabet? meta ended up slightly better only because they had three or four really strong consumer brands.
They can from the openvsx store
https://open-vsx.org/

We also import your extensions automatically (safe guarding against the ones with Microsoft's licensed)

You can also just download in from the vscode marketplace webpage and drag and drop it in
Of course term rewriting has a meaning of its own, it is at the same time more meaningful and simpler as any other form of computation.
No. The ports were just expanding on an existing idea. I live in a port city, a thousand years ago middle ages people with much smaller boats used this same area to travel much shorter distances with fewer goods, today it has those cranes and a railway and moves inter-modal containers which have travelled from across the world, but it's just the same idea.

Why is there a port here? Because of the unusual tidal pattern? Deep water? No. People. The other reasons are reasons to put the port here maybe in particular rather than a few miles in either direction, but the people are why there's a port. In 1024 there were thousands of people, today perhaps closer to half a million depending on how you count.

There are no people on Luna, and no people on Mars. Visiting these barren rocks is like going up Everest.

This damp rock is where our species was born and it's where it will die. It's not much, but its ours, and there's nothing like it within any plausible travel distance.
You appear to be correct; thanks for pointing it out. I'm now seeing[1] a 10 point lead for Trump among ages 45-64, and a tie among ages 65+. My mental model was still based on the 2016 and 2020 numbers.

[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-elections/exit-polls
> Trump had way less war than now. Ukraine, Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen.

That’s about as accurate as saying that I ”had“ less war on my previous job. As it turns out, though, the world doesn’t revolve around me, and neither around the US president. Other actors exist, and they make their own decisions.

I don’t know how to take your rambling around free speech seriously. Do you really argue that we should treat „alternative facts“ as valuable free speech? That we should support people actively deceiving others? Maybe, just maybe, when free speech collides with basic democratic resilience, democracy itself ought to win out?

> Trump has literally been brought to a courthouse and had his mugshot taken and you're talking about "jailing opponents"?

For an actual crime he committed. As it is supposed to be. Yet, he pushed for legislation to ensure he’s literally above the law.
> having to actually manually read the trace instead of all this new-fangled automation that guides you through it.

I never met a LifePak 12 that did not flag every 12 lead it saw as an "Abnormal ECG".
Yes, to do anything at all in the rest of the universe.

We are insatiably curious explorers. The cosmos calls to us. Many are willing to do anything they can to answer that call.