skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I was watching a streamer who once referred to something as “stupid” before they corrected themselves to use a different word (I don’t remember because it’s not the point). The reason for their correction was that they believe that word to be a lazy way of describing something; lots of things can be considered generally “stupid” but there’s always some underlying reason for that conclusion which will invariably be a more informative descriptor. (It takes effort to discover this reason, hence it’s “lazy” when one does not.)

I do commonly see “fascist” used to describe things in similar ways where the person seems to be expressing a general disdain for something. They do successfully convey some meaning but it’s very non-specific. Just food for thought for readers who want their opinions heard more than they want to hem and haw over the specific meanings of words.
Funny how "far right" parties are always the fault of foreign countries and never the result of the parties in power fucking over the local population year after year.
> Hetzner, OVH or even DO aren't even close to offering what AWS offers

But I think the argument is - do they need to be? How much of the services of AWS (Google/azure/etc) are really needed by the majority of customers?

For companies that need hyperscaling services, I get it. There are definite benefits to the cloud when operating at extremes (auto scaling up and down). But for the majority of workloads, I think you could be well served by a more barebones offering.
If you think there is a 0.1% difference between the parties, that is because there is that much difference in the issues you care about.
<< I'd like to know which part of Eastern Europe that means.

Not OP, but I can absolutely vouch for local negative sentiment in Eastern Europe. Granted, some of it is a direct result of war in Ukraine ( and a lot of those refugees getting benefits and priority for government services in host countries ).

It is hard for the population in general to get that they are getting a deal, when they don't. Maybe some individual billionaire does, but if anything, it only exacerbates the issue further by focusing anger on that one person.
Can the "Red Mirage" and "Blue Shift" be explained with math? ELECTION 2024
It seems fairly evident that human trafficking has had an economical positive effect on countries who practiced it. It is an common observed fact that the current construction sector is dependent on human trafficking and most current construction projects would fail to meet their goals without a steady stream of cheap, untaxed illegal labor that do not need to follow safety regulations.

However for people who work in those sectors the picture tend to look differently with wages and good safety practices being suppressed. Construction companies that follow regulations and pay taxes for all their employees will loose in the competitive market. The effect on the economy may be a net-positive, and it may also be true that most countries could not contain growth if construction actually cost as much as it had to without the illegal practices, but that is all multiple aspects of the same issue.
Wish I could agree. I've seen a marked shift in tone.

What I'd say is that there is a significant number of "libertarians" whose "liberty" veneer is scratching off and the authoritarian conservative body underneath is starting to show through, as it always does.

Also, most "lefty" US tech workers are "lefty" only on social/cultural issues -- and would not be broadly in favour of socialist or social democratic economic policy... which I guess describes Democrats in the US generally.
Thanks for the link. Interesting graph! Do you know what caused the increase in 2021?
Reddit is finding out that if you block everyone not inside your echo chamber, but are still in the smaller echo chamber, every election will shock you

It unfortunately sits on the shoulders of progressives seeking change to convince the conservatives not seeking it to do so. By choosing not to do this asymmetric work, this is the consequence
It depends how you are backing up to S3 and in what format. If you are using something like pg_dump, this tool may not make sense. But if you want to say sync to S3 in parquet or something like that, then it might. Parquet support is TBD for now.
Ask HN: How do you manage your content calendar for social media?
I'm building Prismix (AI social media manager) and curious about pain points other technical founders/teams face with social media content planning.

- How do you currently plan/schedule social content?

- What's the most time-consuming part of managing social media?

- For those using existing tools, what's still missing?

- How much time do you spend weekly on social media management?

Context: Building this because I found existing solutions either too complex or missing key automation features. Would love to hear HN's perspective.
To find what causes your laptop drains its battery, you can use

sudo powermetrics
'Cosmic inflation' vs. mirror universe going backwards in time
You’ll get downvoted by women because "I offer you nothing,” is strikingly untrue about abortion.
The terminal version of Disk Utility is actually much better than the GUI (it doesn't hang and the app is glitchy.

Docs are at https://ss64.com/mac/diskutil.html
Basically questioning tax-money spendings
The biggest problem is gradual deterioration of the rule of law and functioning of the civil government
But if the acrobats start dropping stuff, we all might feel it.
uBlock origin

https://superuser.com/questions/1285891/ublock-hide-any-elem...

https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1eud2rw/block...
All of which are "social liberal".

These, and a lot of other things are pretty much randomly left/right. For example in the UK it was the traditionally right wing party that legalised same sex marriage. In the 70s the left (then actual socialists!) opposed EEC membership, by the time we left the EU it was the right who wanted to leave.

What the US never had (and which is pretty much dead in the UK now) is a real economically left wing party. In the UK this has lead to a lot of people (including myself) feeling that there is not much difference between the big parties. This helps for extreme parties in the UK. In the US which is more of a two party system perhaps it helps feed the rise of extreme movements within the existing parties?
> The American idea itself is in decline.

America isn't an idea any more than England is an idea. We're a specific group of people with a specific heritage.
Both of you are taking these blatantly extreme narratives and putting them ot as though they were fact.

The reality is that immigration is not all good for the average person. Similarly, it's not all bad for the average person either. When we frame these discussions in the stark extremist terms on either side, we get into trouble.

We have to calibrate immigration, so that we get the good, without getting so much of the bad. There are so many untruths floating out there right now about immigration on both sides that it's hard for the people trying do that calibrating to actually make any progress. When we try to get a handle on the good or the bad, invariably, someone's narrative is going to be shown as false.

There is an impact on wages, that's lamentable and it causes pain in a lot of the middle class. Let's put our heads together and see how can we address that?

Some people are not willing to admit that there are people of foreign origin who are critical additions to our intellectual capital. But a reasoned analysis would concede that H1B's are not even close to the same as NIWs in that regard. We probably can source a lot of H1B work natively. We should still offer the H1B opportunity though, so what does that balance look like?

Crime? Crime is definitely a problem. The data shows that it doesn't get better through the generations as one side would have you believe. At the same time, it isn't as prolific among people of foreign origin as the other side would have you believe. (Heck, in all honesty, the data shows crime isn't even as prolific among native born Americans as one side would have you believe.) Do we have to address it? Absolutely, but we shouldn't look at everyone as a criminal.

We need balance to address these issues wisely, but balance is severely lacking in contemporary civic discourse here in the US. And therefore, balance is lacking in our policy decisions.
Currently, It is the opposite, I think ..
My grandfather taught me how to do it 40 years ago.
So far, the policy differences between the different far-right parties in Europe hasn't really prevented them from cooperating. Besides, a lot of the meddling by US conservatives pushes on specific issues, so they don't mind funding two parties with opposed views on orthogonal topics.
SQL has a BETWEEN AND operator:

SELECT count() FROM hits
WHERE EventDate BETWEEN '2024-01-01' AND '2024-11-11'

https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/sql-reference/operators
> Russia is however a bit paranoid about its own security, having being invaded numerous times over the centuries and wants to keep control of its own economic destiny.

In soviet Russua, Russia is the one constantly being invaded.
Elegant software for a more civilized age.
Yeah, it was a pretty big change actually. You're right though, the conversation didn't change much even as access to healthcare did change.
Trump says no.

It's unavoidable, because he's world's strongest man now. All his rhetoric escapades and lies and all deals & done's - this will be in the press the next 4 years. Even if you block him on all devices, he still will be present all over the offline-media.

The best thing is to accept that he won and check how his thinking influences your
Personal life and find a way to use that for your advantage. It's a chance for some and a great possibility for others..

Let's see where this all will lead to..
I think "looks like" is very ephemeral to what being a mainframe IS. it's true that MP systems can look like a single entity, but they are highly asynchronous. The prism architecture meant a single clock state propagating cleanly across the CPU(s) provided a consistent, time managed framework to be all things to all people. (thats how I understand it)

A Sun E10000 is to my mind, as close as a mainframe gets in the post-sparc era. The Tandem non-stops had some of it, the final Dec cluster model was getting there but in a distributed async clocked manner.

In the end the point of the mainframe was the TPC. The sustained rate it could process edge device request-response sequences inside the bounds of your choices in the CAP theorem. Distributed systems solve the same problem, but with other consequences. It still freaks me out that IBM had so many irons in the fire they had room to do this, AND to make unix work inside this, and manage legacy, and scale out to whole-of-government or SAGE or SABRE or you-name-it.

I hated using AIX as a sysadmin from Dec world view btw. I'm not an IBM fanboi. I lived in the competition.
I worked with a guy once back in the 80s who did the radar preamp on Pioneer Venus I believe it was. Very bright individual.
So that means some of them were issued cell phones as part of their deployment? Huh.
They do have an instantaneous effect. The unemployment rate is toggled using interest rates and the impact is seen immediately.
I'm confused by something in the "A Practical Guide to (Correctly) Troubleshooting with Traceroute" which is referenced from the article.

Slide 8 titled "Traceroute – What Hops Are You Seeing?" says:

> By convenction, the ICMP is sourced from the ingress interface.

(I assume the author means "the source address of the ICMP message is the address of the ingress interface")

> Random factoid: This behavior is actually non-standard. RFC1812 says the ICMP source MUST be from the egress interface. If obeyed, this would prevent traceroute from working properly.

(I assume by "ICMP source" the author means "the source address of the ICMP message" because I don't see what else it can mean).

To clarify: from the text before that, and the drawing on the slide, the egress interface the author talks about is the egress interface the original message would have taken had its TTL not expired.

Now, I had a look at RFC 1812 (Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers) and I don't see where it says what that slide claims. The closest I can find is section 4.3.2.3 Original Message Header (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1812#section-4.3.2.3) which says:

> Except where this document specifies otherwise, the IP source address in an ICMP message originated by the router MUST be one of the IP addresses associated with the physical interface over which the ICMP message is transmitted. If the interface has no IP addresses associated with it, the router's router-id (see Section [5.2.5]) is used instead.

To me that reads completely different from the claim on that slide (and also looks like I would have expected).

The author of the presentation seems more knowledgeable about networking details than I am, so it's very well possible that he's right and I'm misunderstanding something. Can anyone shed some light on that?

References:

2016 version of the presentation as linked from the article: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/a-practical-guide-to-co...

Updated 2020 version as helpfully linked by 1xdevnet in comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42056734: https://storage.googleapis.com/site-media-prod/meetings/NANO...

RFC 1812: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1812
The mother is providing care for the unborn child with her body. Seems like needing care vs. being unable to exist on its own is a distinction without a difference.
> There could have been some "look out for your wife" messaging, but there wasn't.

No but there was plenty of "if you're married and vote for Trump you're a misogynist" or "no real man with daughters can vote for Trump" messaging which rightly fell flat.

That Trump won the popular vote is astounding. That he's currently ahead in Michigan is insane, politically/electorally speaking. By 10pm last night the MSNBC crowd was already starting the "this was just about the economy," "no incumbent Dem could have won," "no challenging Rep could have lost" cope.

The Democratic party has an opportunity here to put DEI, identity politics, and culture war nonsense in the garbage where it belongs, and everyone on the left who was talking about unity and bringing America together 24 hours ago has an opportunity now to show whether they meant it, or if they only meant it on their terms.
White men were the peak of society. Every policy, improvising the rights of all other people, especially women, is chipping away from their Throne. Naturally, some will see this as a threat and a loss, especially when you are regularly feed with misinformation. That society as a whole is becoming better, doesn't help the groups who are losing from it. And this is showing for a while now.
Can you check it now?
how does it differ from mozilla pocket?
Canada is closer, why not there? Just curious. I'm from a Nordic nation but don't know how easy it is to immigrate.
What could Trump do in that respect? Bring back coal? Coal isn't coming back. The economics aren't there short of literally paying for the burning of coal. And while Trump seems to lean into the AGW deniers, he does seem to at least respect reducing the classic "silent spring" sorts of pollution that obviously dirty air and water.

US oil production is the highest in the world, the highest in its history, and is so maxed out that there are loads of drilling rights that aren't even being exercised as oil companies all realized that it was pyrrhic with current low oil prices.

On the climate position I don't think things can go back. Wind, solar and evolving nuclear just make it a silly thing to do.
If you replace “Nvidia” with the much broader “technology” then it is indeed the major reason the modern world economy is good.
That's not an example. Give me a policy, or at least a promise of a policy, literally anything coming from a democrat's mouth that would prove that the left is actually antagonizing men as a group.

Meanwhile, Trump has said that you should grab them by the P-word, Vance has criticized "childless cat ladies" as if being a single woman should be a crime. I can go on and on, it really is that simple.
Agreed. Most people want what’s best for everyone and vote that way from their POV. We all have pieces of the truth. The best way to see the whole truth is bringing those pieces together.
They absolutely can. The funded and drove all of the research and development that led to Rust, which would not have been created otherwise.
In four years trump isn’t going to be able to speak in complete sentences, much less run for office.

We don’t have to worry about him stealing any more elections, he’s far too old for that to be an issue
Studies show you've got it backwards. If you let a nurse or programmer into the country, they're going to take a job that's otherwise filled by an American, depressing skilled wages.

If you let in an unskilled laborer, they're going to take a job that nobody wants. They spend those wages, boosting the economy.

In both cases, studies show that the number of jobs stays roughly the same; immigrants create about the same amount of jobs as they take. However skilled immigrants decrease average wages, and unskilled immigrants increase average wages.

It's the outliers that really tip the balance, though. If one of those immigrants turns out to be Jensen Huang or his parents, that's how you make America great.
not necessarily. in the past 5 years, the x86 monopoly in the server world has broken. arm chips like graviton are a substantial fraction (20%?) of the server CPU market.
Okay. Let's take conspiracy theories. Trump has promoted the Obama birther conspiracy, pizza gate, that the Clintons are responsible for the death of Epstein and other political opponents, that there was fraud in the 2012 election and various false claims about the 2016, 2020 and 2024 elections, various tropes about Soros etc...

It's a fact that Trump shared and promoted these. It's a fact that they are conspiracy theories.
No matter how dank the memes no 3rd party meme candidate will ever win. The two big parties are just too rich and powerful and you need the support of one of them to have a legitimate chance.
This particular issue would be great for competition, and the economy. Conglomerates always have a discount. Whilst (perhaps) unpopular, this is one thing I'm rather in favour of.
This is also what billionaires and the rich want, which is how you can tell rural USA isn't going to gain anything. But they'll blame immigration or some other issue instead of the people swimming in gold coins, making them work harder for less money year over year.
The "abortion" issue is very poor marketing and I don't understand why this has never been corrected. It's not about unwanted children, it's more about the 1/5 chance a woman has of miscarrying and what happens after (along with the array of other pregnancy related issues).
Will the wages increase more than the prices?

Aren't most things Americans buy imported or contain imported parts (for example all electronics)?

Won't a decrease in exports, because of other nations ti-for-tat tariffs, decrease wages for many US workers?
That's handy, thanks! `osc copy` may also take args for files to copy to the clipboard, but in the absence of that and no data on stdin it maybe should switch to paste.
What happens when the enemy is deemed to be within?
Overeducated people are as much manipulable, but in a different way
Is there reason to believe that the extra voters would've helped Kamala instead of Donald?
country X is funding party Y != party Y exists because of country X.
Today men represent 42% of 4 year college students. The gap between men and women enrolled in 4 year college is higher than it was before Title IX was enacted, but in the opposite direction this time. Wages are falling far behind inflation, and home ownership feels entirely out of reach for most young people due to skyrocketing housing prices. Additionally young people are more single and lonely than ever. Most of these issues do not exclusively affect men, but there are lots (millions) of young men who are unsure if they will ever be able to find a partner, own a home, and work a job that can help support a family. There's a reason toxic hyper-masculine, conservative influences have grown hugely in popularity; they are tapping into these insecurities a lot of young men are facing. Only Republicans are bothering to address this demographic with claims about how they're going to help them start their own business, improve own a home, make a decent living, etc.

Telling young men today that they actually shouldn't care about any of these things because they had it so good 60 years ago has done nothing but alienate people who might otherwise have supported Democrats.
>he definitely has ideas.

'Concepts', he has 'concepts'. You'll hear about them in about two weeks time.
I was under the impression that we now know how to do low-fuel paths through the solar system using gravity. It's more a question of how long do you want to take to get where you're going.
At least 30% of any blue state voted for Trump. If you actually believed 30% of the walking public wanted to do your family harm, you'd be in another country.

You're just being dramatic because you think everyone who voted for Trump is stupid.

Try taking a different tack. Maybe over 50% of the country is not stupid and don't wish you harm? Your family will be stronger if you try to understand your fellow man.
Do you hear yourself? In one breath you agree with me that income inequality is rising, and then say it’s bad for service workers to have higher wages.
Again, I find it very small-minded to imply that I'm a denier because I advocate for questioning what we are told. Furthermore, you are putting words on my mouth which make no sense at all.

People should understand there can be healthy middle grounds, which Parent obviously struggles with.

I don't deny anthropogenic climate change, on the contrary, I'm believe it's real and there's evidence for it.

I am, however, sceptical of how it's being presented and used.
I mean, he'd be ineligible to join the military, but can run it. He'd fail a security clearance, but can hand them out. Many states forbid felons from even voting.

"You can be president from a jail cell" is likely to be a "well that wouldn't happen" oversight on the Founding Fathers' plate, not an intentional design.
The dip is probably COVID; it's not really an increase, more return to norm.
> The research of yesterday was on another level than most of what is done today

In what ways? The impact? That can't be proven until "tomorrow" comes, no?
someone doesn't understand how passing laws work. Just because you barely have a majority, does not mean you can do anything you want.
I think it was even more simple: Democrats put a senile man up for office.
> I guess that shows our collective feeling toward democracy.

It doesn't, it shows a majority reject major narratives that have been used. Part of that rejection of the idea that an authoritarian regime just came to power.

If you are worried about violence, consider the origin of the assassination attempts.
Not true, restrictive states had significantly lower mortality. Mask mandates being the most significant factor. The largest gaps in mortality occur in the latter half of 2020 and the latter half of 2021, during Delta.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullartic...