skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Both represent the working class, just different subsets. Rural working class vs urban working class.
It’s fascinating how no one mentions that Trump didn’t pass comprehensive immigration legislation during his first term despite it being core to his platform.

This issue is a mess and has been kicked down the road for literal decades at this point. Maybe finally it will get passed…
Forgive my ignorance but I didn't realise there were states it was illegal in.

> There aren't states where terminating pregnancies is forced.

I personally don't think this could ever come from a mandated level (same as outright bans), I think instead we see it in the form of social pressure: and we can already see it across the US. An estimated 65% of abortions in the US are unwanted but the mother was heavily pressured by peers, family, work, etc. You can also see this in the downstream effects: getting an abortion raises your chances of suicide by 6x and depression by 4x.

Clinics also do not screen for coersion, the same way organ donations, adoptions, loans are all screened.

Again, should abortion be illegal because of the above? No. But it does indicate it's not as innocent as making sure women are ready/able/willing to have a child.
"America first" (read: "Trump first").
It is going to be interesting to see all the different ways that guy is going to enrich himself and businesses, again..
A lib can still lock its dependencies and have version ranges declared at the same time. The lock file is an artifact than is used to reproducibly build the lib, while the version ranges are used to see, whether some other project can use the lib.

It is only a matter of tooling. Locking ones dependencies remains the right thing to do, even for a lib.
Transformers were made for machine translation - someone had the insight that when going from one language to another the context mattered such that the tokens that came before would bias which ones came after. It just so happened that transformers we more performant on other tasks, and at the time you could demonstrate the improvement on a small scale.
It's true, not all fascists are also necessarily convicted sexual abusers, amongst a host of no doubt other horrible things.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-tells-christians-they...
More than that, I think there was a lot of democrat messaging that the economy is the greatest its ever been because of Biden. When I would say, it is because of Nvidia, haha. and what does that have to do with the price of milk or eggs for some random american?
It is not even as embarrassing as some people think.

Ukraine send well trained troops there while they were needed in the east. Now they are loosing the ground there but cant really pull out. While loosing trained soldiers as well.

If anything this played quite well for Russia.
Trump and the World – What His Return Means for American Foreign Policy
Looks like he also might win the popular vote. First republican to win the popular vote since 2004. If this is true, then this was a clear mandate that the a majority of voters prefer Trump's policies over the other side. We might not like it, but this is how democracy works.

There is certainly going to be domestic and international chaos in the coming years. But a realignment of the world order and domestic politics was inevitable. It's not going to be end of the world like some are making out to be. Nor is it going to be the end of the United States. There will be opportunities. Buckle up and find opportunities where you can.
Sums it up beautifully, thank you
Probably more like wages will go up when cheap foreign labor is off the table. Higher income offsets higher prices for industries where wages rise. For the currently well paid the purchasing power may drop.

Silicon Valley didn't care about the rust belt, so why should the rust belt care about SV?
* curbing government spending - elon musk said that he plans cutting about $2T. It includes social security.

* reducing illegal immigration - mass deportation is a fantasy. in reality trump will not do much about it.

* protecting unborn lives - yeah, more women will die instead. good job.

* restraining Iran + proxies - yeah, Putin is a best buddy of Iranian leaders and Trump will be in their company too.

* continuing economic growth - trimp policies will lead to recession.

* Ukraine - it's utterly fucked.

* additional inflation caused by tariff - on spot. companies will not hesitate to gauge pricing more than necessary because of tariffs.

* ongoing political polarization - it's not just polarization. It will be on the edge of the civil war when Trump will order shoot protesters.
Trump has pushed to extricate the US from NATO, and as De Niro said in Ronin; "if there's doubt then there is no doubt".

If you want security can you really rely on someone who may or may not have your back, especially if they have a policy of transactionalism?

So, the EU needs to look to their own security, and the ultimate deterrence is nuclear weapons. And if the EU doesn't take up the mantle then the Poles will definitely do it, and probably Sweden, and possibly Finland / Germany. And so the EU needs to figure out if they are happy with a fragmented nuclear policy or not.
How come? Trump’s just won an election with it.
There's a huge difference between invading a NATO member and invading a non-NATO member. And ultimately I don't think Russia has the capability to continue invading more countries with or without the US' opposition, this war has been a nonstop embarrassment for them.

If Poland France and the UK are more invested in opposing Russia then one would think that the Ukraine wouldn't be entirely reliant on the US to support it. This is the fundamental problem with the proxy war in the Ukraine, the people pushing for it talk about it as if the fate of the European continent rests on the fulcrum of the Ukraine and yet the other European countries hardly seem to care.
I feel like that's a story HN and a lot of tech likes to tell itself, but the truth is that when push comes to shove they support candidates who are neither, but _are_ deeply right wing.

Concrete actions tell the real story.
It has morphed. Or at least the algorithms are pushing militant feminism far more prominently nowadays.

All these guys see on their social feeds, day-in, day-out, is 'feminists' stating that all men are just rapists-in-waiting and how they should have their rights and/or autonomy restricted, or from the most extreme examples, be physically mutilated or outright murdered.

You don't have to look hard to find this stuff on social media, and once you do find it, that's all you'll ever be served.
I mean Modi is (was?) the member of a radical nationalist hindu milita from the age of 8. Modi has been popularly elected multiple times so seeing someone similar win the US election is probably what you want to see if you are a BJP voter.
"major" is subjective. They are larger than the vast majority of companies. That makes them "major" to me at least.
I guess dead squirrel changed public opinion enough.
I guess there is no group of people that trump hasn’t name called (dems, gays, hispanics, blacks, you name it, etc.).

It should’ve been disqualifying when president publicly mocks and physically parodies disabled journalist instead of answering god damn questions.

Taking high road didn’t help in 2016, wouldn’t have helped now.

But this trend is obviously not only in USA. Some political groups and their voters don’t care what is said, and other political group must upstand the highest moral standards.
It seems to me like those in power should be the ones to attempt to find common ground with those they govern.

Am I crazy to think that?
One of the hardest lessons to learn growing up is that there aren't really any adults, not in the sense I believed when I was a kid. "Adult" is a role people play when they're interacting with kids. Some do it better than others. But inside every adult is a terrified child† desperately struggling to make sense of an uncertain, incomprehensible world. Unfortunately for that child, life always ends in death; it won't be long until you are dead and everyone who remembers you is dead. And our reasoning abilities are not capable of understanding very much of the world, so often nothing we do matters, not even for the purposes it was intended for. Mostly our understanding of the world consists of stories we tell ourselves with relatively little connection to reality.

Our understanding of the world is profoundly mediated by fiction, which is to say, lies.

That's why it all ends up like children arguing on the playground. The kind of playground‡ where my 14-year-old classmate Evangalyn Martinez got stabbed to death for, I think it was, stealing Joella Mares's boyfriend, and nobody leaves the playground alive.

Under those circumstances, what does it mean to live a good life rather than a bad one? Good answers exist, but they're not easy.

______

† This is a metaphor. I don't mean that each adult has literally swallowed a child and is digesting them alive like a python.

‡ Technically that was actually the parking lot. Also, I was already no longer her classmate at the time, and because we were in different grades, I don't remember if I ever met her. She wouldn't be my last classmate to be stabbed; in my high school biology class each student was paired with the same lab partner for the whole semester, and the next year, someone else at the high school nonfatally stabbed my lab partner, Shannon Sugg, now Shannon L. Schneider (ginga.snapz1718). If memory serves, she dropped out from the psychological trauma. You can read the decision in her lawsuit against the school at https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/nm-court-of-appeals/141549..., which says it was Alicia Andres who stabbed her. ”Plaintiff asserts that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment imposed a clearly established duty upon school officials to protect her from this stabbing.” I'm glad violent crime has dropped a lot since then in the US.
Trump has called his opponents fascists a million times.
Voters everywhere are stupid but in the country of exceptionalism, they lately seem to have become exceptionally stu... tolerant!
All the things you listed are a result of neoliberal austerity politics much more than they are a result of immigration.
I think you're putting words in my mouth. IMO in this scenario the medical decision-making process should weigh both lives equally. Doctors make life-and-death decisions all the time, and I'm OK with that as long as one life is not considered "lesser". I understand that reasonable people can disagree on when life truly starts, though.
My honest opinion is we need a multipolar world. Then the US can do as much shit as it wants but the rest of the world doesn't have to care.
> you won't win by claiming to be 0.1% less bad.

Please.
Context from the previous post in the series:

> Behavioral Programming is a relatively new programming paradigm that excels at isolating and composing behaviors in event driven system.

> Behavioral programming was invented by David Harel[0], who also invented statecharts in 1987. It uses independent units of behavior, called bthreads, which are coordinated in a pub-sub protocol.

[0] https://cacm.acm.org/research/behavioral-programming/ (2012)
"Am I out of touch? No, it's the American voter who is wrong"
That's a good point, although it was projected he would win against Biden.
Good point! I overlooked that. On the other hand, the larger states having large bloc votes plays in their favor.
> literally

I do not think you know what this word means.
> ... that airs too many radical sentiments that men are shit and useless.

Are some people on TikTok saying things like this? Sure. Was this part of the campaign's messaging or the party's platform? No. Not in the least.
I accidentally deleted /etc/ thanks to a syntax error in my script and got fired.

I hated the boss of DevOps team and they hated me. Greatest thing to ever happen to me.
Economists, a conservatively skewed bunch, are not optimistic about his plans: https://qz.com/donald-turmp-taxes-tariffs-economy-simon-john...

The majority of women are not enthusiastic about his plans on that front either
What, in practice, was too crazy and left in the Biden administration? (Honestly asking)
> Most men care.

I don't think so, caring means doing something about it, if men weren't deeply misogynistic there would have been a woman president decades before. The behavior of men is not surprising however and is expected.

What is shocking is half the women in this country also don't care about their own interests either.

It is one thing for immigrants or working class to be voting against their own interests, economic and border policies are abstract and people historically have failed to attribute links to the administration responsible. Abortion is not abstract however, the linkage to right-wing policy is straightforward.
Saying "Leaked" feels like clickbait in this case.
Which is a bit of a weird argument because people did get punched hard in 2020. Things were mostly very bad during Trump’s last year in office. Jobs were lost, millions died; Trump himself spent days in intensive care in October 2020.

Political memories are very short. Trump can get excused for the botched Covid response because it’s ancient history, but Biden can’t get excused for global inflation which followed from the same disaster.
Had they been properly pinned before, you would not have had to work for a few days. Code in a Jupyter notebook is unlikely to be relied upon elsewhere. Perfectly good for making it always use the exact same versions (checked by checksums, whatever tool you are using).
5 logical fallacies in 10 words that's a pretty good score!
Powering the Mars Base
It clearly shows how bad the D candidate/policy is, such that people prefered the R candidate with all the flaws you listed. The eye opener should be why people rejected the D candidates.
I don't have my Fellowship at hand now, but doesn't Frodo joke near the beginning he's "the lord of the rings" and Gandalf scolds him by telling him something like "there's only one lord of the rings"?

Found the quote by googling, he was scolding Pippin, not Frodo, and it was "Ring" singular after all:

> "Hurray!" cried Pippin, springing up. "Here is our noble cousin! Make way for Frodo, Lord of the Ring!"

> "Hush!" said Gandalf from the shadows at the back of the porch. "Evil things do not come into this valley; but all the same we should not name them. The Lord of the Ring is not Frodo, but the master of the Dark Tower of Mordor, whose power is again stretching out over the world!"

(Book II, Chapter I)
Lifting all sanctions against Russia. Putin helped Trump to win this election in the end.
Probably not a good message to circumvent the democratic process and skip the primary either
These come from Juno, a mission sent in 2011 and orbiting Jupiter since 2016. Must say it wasn't really on my radar anymore, but looking at the timeline on Wikipedia, it's still going around and getting close ("perijove") every month and a week or so, at an ever-increasing longitude https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juno_(spacecraft)#Timeline The planned end of the mission is in about a year. The camera was "included in the payload to facilitate education and public outreach [but] later re-purposed to study the dynamics of Jupiter's clouds"
In italy happened the same "nooo you can't call them fascist"

Freedom of protest was, in fact, restricted in italy in a way that it affects climate manifestations more than lobbies manifestation - we have taxis striking and blocking cities if someone wants to touch their ungodly privileges -

Journalist striked on the public news because news has become unreliable, propaganda spewing news at a level before unheard of

It didn't happen, but Giorgia meloni wanted to abolish the crime of torture to better allow police to do its work (lmao even)

At the season opening of the teather la scala di Milano, one man shouted "viva l'Italia antifascista" (long live antifacist italy). Police was sent to check his documents and similar intimidatory shit
Apparently claiming the other side is worse in Gaza issue is not enough. Democratic voters simply refuse to turn out in swing states like Michigan and Wisconsin.
Might acknowledge, but fails to fix. For instance, leading genre is biography since they aren't excluding 'name dropping'.
Did that really happen though? or did the right just amplify those messages because they're very effective to campaign on? and now everyone just repeats them. Maybe even making a lot of young men feel even more despondent and useless in the process.

Kinda funny how the moment real progress is made on trying to give anyone other than males a hand up, they start crying like babies about how they're not getting enough attention. Meanwhile, those same men are literally stripping away women's rights to their own body.
That really isn't the primary alienating and divisive rhetoric from this election. It's just the bit you didn't like.
I don’t believe you are correct. People who vote for a man as debased, self centered, sexually depraved, and criminally inclined as Trump are “wrong”. White men latched onto a horrible person as their savior. If that’s what they want then they deserve what comes. But the people who don’t want that should stick to their principles.

What does it say about Trump that so many of his lawyers and advisors ended up in jail and that so few former cabinet members endorsed him? What does it say about his supporters who cared not that he raped children with his pal Epstein?

Remember when Cruz and Lindsey Graham spoke honestly about Trump just before November 2016? Recall what they said then to what they say now. It’s a cult.
Yeah that one has more emphasis on the "cautiously" than the "optimistic" :-) Both parties have largely ignored this issue since the Tea Party movement, but it has been mentioned somewhat prominently in this campaign.
He literally tried to overthrow the election 4 years ago. I mean, he wasn't exactly being subtle about it!
Yeah this trope won’t die. You can win an internet thread with data that tells people they don’t know they’re better off, but you can’t win an election when they don’t believe it.

“Nobody likes my product because they are stupid”.
Democrats lost the enthusiasm once they sidelined Bernie Sanders for Hillary Clinton at that time they had a similar fire among it's voters. I feel they lost a lot of young male voters at that time and they are still paying for it
Indeed. It's crazy to me that unionizing is seen as a bad thing by exactly the people that would benefit from them, these days.

They're only bad for big companies that prey on and abuse their workers.
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42058952 for details on current and past capital intensity in the US. It doesn't take a very big department in most industries to get past seven figures of capital stock, sometimes just a single person and virtually always less than ten people.
Sounds like someone has yield problems...
The people yearn for the Microsoft Courier [0].

[0]: https://youtu.be/UmIgNfp-MdI
It's getting really noticeable across every western democracy.

The far-left strategy seems to be clientele politics, and attempting to rule over the fractured result.
No way that is true if you did it properly. Practically nobody has a workload where this could be true - and it's definitely not a workload smaller than several DCs.

It doesn't work out well if you just create some long lived EC2 instances and call it a day. But that's not really using a cloud, just a VPS - and that has indeed never been cheaper than having your own servers. You need to go cloud native if you want to save money.
> Doesn’t project 2025 aim to dismantle a lot of the current establishment?

Didn't the Reps distance themselves from that? Vocally and repeatedly?

You may think that that playbook is their playbook, but apparently their distancing themselves from it worked well enough.
> We had an R state rep candidate come by our house. Highlighted two issues in her message to us. Both were simply not actual things. The existence of the problems were lies.

This has been a constant refrain from Democrats: "The thing that you are upset about is not happening. Well, it is happening, but it is the exception. Ok, it's happening everywhere, but it's a good thing." No, of course Harris isn't for government sex changes for imprisoned illegal immigrants, except for the fact that she said she was. The truth is that we all know that she would say anything to win, and holding her to any position she ever publicly held feels unfair.

The people who have been kept low-information are the Democrats, because they have been surrounded by media largely controlled by their political party. Republicans often have bad information, but they're constantly out there consuming information and hate-reading what Democrats are saying. Independents, in my experience, are the highest-information of all, because they don't think of political parties as something they can offload their morality to. Independents only see politics in terms of actual issues, and track those issues rather than having parasocial relationships with political celebrities.

In that vein, I'm pretty sure that if I had an experience where a political candidate came to my house and talked about issues that weren't real, I'd talk about those issues specifically, and speculate about their origin. I think you don't mention them because they were real, but a lot of liberals have taken this position of officially denying reality if reality could help Trump. Is widespread voter fraud real? No. Should people be unconcerned about making it easier? Also, no.

If upper-middle class liberals could have won the "stop sounding like Scientologists" challenge, they could have won. If The Democratic party could have wanted to win more than they wanted to avoid alienating any donors, they could have won by taking any popular position on anything. Trump spent most of his campaign actively campaigning for Harris by calling her a radical-left socialist; if she were actually a radical-left socialist instead of an empty vessel to be filled with cash, she would have won. If the Democratic party hadn't chosen again not to run a fair, open, lively primary, they would have won.

With Trump campaigning against radical-left socialist Harris, and Harris campaigning against rapist Hitler, homophobic Stalin, and racist Mussolini, the majority of people looked at which candidate was lying the most, and voted for the other one. Everybody knows who Trump is, and he's already been president, and nobody went to camps. It was a rather sleepy standard Republican presidency, whose few deviations from the norm pleased people. The only reason we heard about Harris is because she (and Buttigieg) pretended to be for single-payer healthcare in order to destroy a popular candidate who was running on an honest program.
> I wonder what they perceive as "acting like man".

As late as yesterday a woman I need to listen to had opinions on something as basic as how men are supposed to pee, telling that how most men feel comfortable peeing is wrong.

That is just one.

But I think it goes all the way from kindergarten up in some places.
I've not been as immersed in the presidential race, but hasn't he explicitly said he wants to be a dictator, this is the last vote you will need, we should stop so and so from voting and so on? Like, right out of his mouth? How is that not an undemocratic platform?
Robots and labor in [Japanese] nursing homes [pdf]
Yes, apparently the "leak" is a demo of the model rather than the model weights? I would have expected the latter from the headline.
Butter. Prices for butter climed so high we have to import it from UAE.
I like how you seem to think no atheists voted for Trump
I thought Trump said putting tariffs on everything imported from China would lead to jobs coming back to the US? So Trump said it not me. It’s just an example of where this policy is unworkable is my point.