skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Obat Penyakit Nyeri Sendi
Jangan pernah anggap sepele penyakit nyeri sendi, apa bila di biarkan akan berakibat patal. Maka dari itu kami tawarkan produk kesehatan yang sangat ampuh untuk menyembuhkan penyakit nyeri sendi dan penyakit lainnya, hanya dengan Obat Penyakit Nyeri Sendi Jelly gamat Luxor yang telah terbukti aman serta berkhasiat untuk menyembuhkan nyeri sendi.
I thought prolonger exposure to ultrasound was dangerous, how is uBeam safe?
"we're really, really easy to implement"
"I want to see us become the de facto auth solution"
"We also let you reach many, many more people"
"but we're also a really nice option to put alongside your social login"

Assuming by "we" and "us" you mean Mozilla? Or do you also mean the other major browsers?

Why did you write it like that? Why not just say "Persona" instead of "we" and "us"? Surely Persona is much bigger than Mozilla or do you not think so?

Firstly, that kind of language does not inspire trust. It sounds very much "us" vs "them", instead of addressing the real problem, which is helping users by creating and managing more secure passwords.

Secondly, your marketing to users includes:

"Many sign-in systems carry your profile data with them; some even share that info with other sites and social networks. We believe you should control how your personal information is shared."

You seem to want to attract publishers and yet you show your distrust of them to users.

Also, from experience in Public Web Apps, and the fact that it's still not possible for a user to give raw and pure TCP, UDP or POSIX power to Web Apps (and WebSockets and IndexedDB are not at all the same), I don't think the issue is so much that the user has power, as it is that the browser should have power. As it is today, the user is given very little power at all by the browser. Very little trust. Most spec discussions seem to constantly worry about users shooting themselves in the foot, and are prepared to stop at that, rather than finding ways to empower users to give power to web apps.
- They raised a $4M round led by USV in 2010 (http://avc.com/a_vc/2011/03/the-hashable-pivot.html)

- The founder (http://linkedin.com/pub/michael-yavonditte/3a/919/3b6) was previously the CEO of an ad company that AOL acquired for $340M, and he's also an angel investor and partner at a VC fund -- so, he's obviously an experienced entrepreneur and has an amazing network to support him

Best of luck to everyone on the team and all in their future endeavors, but I think this just tells you how hard startups really are, esp during these crazy times.

It's a constant reminder that having all the money and connections in the world doesn't mean shit about whether you're actually going to build a strong business and end up dominating your market. Obviously, having a nice war chest and good connections will help you execute, but it's only a means to an end and still kind of superficial, and not what makes startups fundamentally succeed. Drop.io was another case in point, the founder was extremely well-connected in the tech scene and in VC circles, yet they failed and got owned by Dropbox - only thing that matters in the long-run is talent and hardcore execution.

Also highlights just how important timing/luck and product-market fit are: http://pmarca-archive.posterous.com/the-pmarca-guide-to-star...

"Markets that don't exist don't care how smart you are."
Have Great time with the London Escorts
Have great time with the London escorts is waiting for you tonight.
I wrote a blog post related to this last week.

'In work why two browsers are better than one'

http://fundsacademy.com/blog/
Great! Let us know at what time you'd like to meet up !
Http://www.Facebook.com/dkchelule
Convert OST to PST Online
OST to PST online is a simple way using PCVITA OST converter tool. This is more reliable software to convert all OST file in three advance formats like OST to PST, OST to MSG, OST to EML files.
It's possible to get syntax highlighting working with it?
You ask why I need to talk about women in the Python community?
I really, really need to post something like this on our blog soon. Watch http://identity.mozilla.com/ for something more polished next week or so. I'd also strongly urge you to just try implementing it on a site. It'll literally take less than 30 lines each of javascript on the frontend and python on the backend, and it'll really demystify the flow between the site and the user.

As an analogy, we work really similarlu to showing a bouncer your ID. The ID has identifying information on it, and it has features that allow you to know that it's authentic and hasn't been tampered with. The bouncer can learn how to validate IDs issued by many different authorities, and can remember this when he sees other IDs from that same authority.

Our IDs are personal public/private keypairs, signed by the email provider.

So, quick and dirty, here's how we work:

I want to log in to 123done.org as foobar@eyedee.me, but to do that, I need an ID with eyedee.me's digital signature on it. So in a popup, my browser sends me over to eyedee.me to ask for that signature.

Before eyedee.me will sign a public key with my name on it, I have to prove that I really am who I say I am. It's just between the two of us, so I can prove my identity however eyedee.me wants. It could be a password, an RSA keyfob, or entering a code from a text message. Whatever it is, eyedee.me is happy that I am who I say I am, and they sign my key and hand it back.

I want to show this to 123done.org, but it's not enough for it to be valid, since we have to prevent malicious websites or phishers from copying it and masquerading as other people. For my ID to be a valid login token, I have to add two more things: what site I'm logging in to, and a timestamp so it expires soon after I hand it over. I then sign that with my private key.

I then take that whole bundle and hand it off to 123done.org.

123done verifies it by asking for eyedee.me's public key (which can be cached), and seeing if that matches the first signature on the ID. If it does, then 123done pulls out the validly signed public key, and checks if it matches the second signature on the ID. If that matches, then the whole package is valid, and 123done knows that I really am foobar@eyedee.me.

Does that make sense? It really just revolves around a document with two signatures: An email provider's which says "This key is associated with this account," and a user's which says "I am associated with that key."
Groupon’s last private-round investors now in the red
I think this is yavo's second failed startup post quigo, the ad network. He did tracked first, then hashable. I'd bet he'll do well in mobile ads though given how well he understands the space. And never underestimate the power of the right rolodex.
I'm no expert, but it sounds like you want to learn to run a marathon before you can crawl. However that said if you have a passion for something pursue it with gusto: Read every book, article and blog that you can find on Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning and find someone who is a true master. Then ask that person how to get started.

I did a quick casual search and found this: https://www.coursera.org/course/nlp

I would try to contact Dan and see what he thinks: http://www.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/

What's the worst that can happen? Reach out...
A Good Business Persons in London
Someone who is A Good Business Persons in London, and someone who is happy to shower you will all the glamour and affection you need but never asking anything in return.
Not because Amazon would be paying local sales tax, because their new business plans with 1 day shipping might(!!) bring them into more competition with local retailers. States putting pressure on Amazon to collect sales tax may have encouraged Amazon into this plan but based on their past opposition I think it has more to do with their guesses about the market.
The biggest issue holding back Web Development isn't Internet Explorer. It's incompetent developers.

I agree entirely with this post. Sure, coding a site to work in IE6 is a pain in the ass, especially when working with JavaScript-powered elements on a site that need to work in every browser. I've always followed the Yahoo graded browser support (http://yuilibrary.com/yui/docs/tutorials/gbs/) baseline when building new sites and have even moved it over to personal projects.

I would chalk it up to experience with older browsers, but I've worked with students fresh out of university that have had to pick up projects that have IE6 as a requirement, and they've coped just fine. Many of the developers that are so up-in-arms over cross-browser support are largely new developers or aren't that good at their job. They'll only be versed in what their favourite blogs will preach, they'll use any jQuery plugin or JS polyfill they think sounds good to make their site better, they've never used the profiler within Firebug and never check the size of their web pages. I spend a lot of time on /r/web_design on Reddit and it is not uncommon to see users posting "great websites" that use Modernizr to "make their sites cross-browser" and weigh in around the 5-10MB mark for something as simple as a basic home page. A large number of front-end developers probably wouldn't last a month at your average agency or development team for a large website.

We all want IE6 and to an extent IE7 to die a horrible death, and Microsoft have clearly done their best to try and get people off a dead platform and onto a new OS. However, we're not talking about rocket science, we're talking about rejigging some code or learning the nuances of each browser your users use. Quoting the latest StatCounter figures (or whatever backs up your argument) to provide an argument for ditching old browsers will have battle-hardened developers laugh in your face, because they aren't your users!

If you're making an application then you have a case for not supporting legacy browsers, but if you're complaining that setting up your crappy WordPress-powered site is too hard in IE6 then either shut up or find alternative employment.
Do you know how much you don't know?
I haven't watched it yet (https://vimeo.com/43548699) but I am intrigued. I like the idea because it departs from the formulaic conference presentation which is becoming a chore in my view.
Pengobatan Batu Ginjal
Mecari solusi pengobatan batu ginjal? obat batu ginjal alami ACE MAXS terbukti manjur dan aman untuk pengobatan batu ginjal.
It makes perfect sense providing you:

1. Believe that the complaining was to effect change

2. Believe that that change has been effected due to Microsoft's actions in trying to kill off IE6.

(This seems to be the position he is taking based on my reading)

If you agree with the above then further complaining serves no purpose except to vent your frustrations which is his main point.

Of course if you do not agree with the above then that is fine, but saying "makes no sense" is a tadge harsh.
Have you ever considered that not everybody can afford to pay "too much"? A lot of people have an income, which is enough to live, but they can't afford anything special.
Hackers Grab and Expose 453,000 Yahoo Login Details
Some things I've learnt about programming
Go feels to me like it is trying to combine C and Python...

That sounds about right. From the Go FAQ: Go is an attempt to combine the ease of programming of an interpreted, dynamically typed language with the efficiency and safety of a statically typed, compiled language.

Of course, whether the precise balance that Go comes to works for you is personal. I really like having most of the efficiency of C and much of the expressiveness of Ruby. I'm just getting started, but I haven't had this much fun learning a new language since I learned Ruby six years ago. Go is differently expressive than Ruby and introduces (to me) some powerful, interesting, and fun ideas (goroutines plus channels, for example.)

I think Ruby will still be my go-to language for everyday tasks, but Go definitely looks like it will have its place in my toolbox, likely replacing my occasional use of C++ at the very least. I also plan to use it on App Engine.

I don't think your post was FUD, but I'm guessing it was "I might have another look in about a decade or so" that might have felt dismissive to some people. That's not FUD, though, and it's fair to express your personal opinion like that.
Yahoo Graded Browser Support
Rovio Releases Amazing Alex
The nature of this is actually a bit different here (here being China). Undoubtedly, some of these products are coming from distribution centers. However, many of them come from small brick and mortar shops and they use this as a means to augment their business. It's pretty common for product pages to also feature the shops where the products are being sold from.

The distribution is generally done by courier companies. It's usually a guy on a bicycle with a bunch of packages that ends up either picking up the package or delivering it on the end. I've seen just about every means of transportation imaginable used to transport packages.

Of course, there are still people losing out and there are still distribution centers in the middle. Plus, there are the people working on the factory floors that are making the products in the first place.

Ordering online is incredibly convenient and it gives access to such a wide range of products that I can't imagine it going away any time soon. I think that in any system someone is going to end up losing out, but hopefully in the future the losses can at least be minimized through robotics and other technology.
Tablet Wars
Digital Foundry looks at the challenges Apple faces with the arrival of the Google Nexus 7 and Microsoft Surface.
Guess: maybe all the pointers to structs are typedef-ed away?
I work for Mozilla on the Persona team, so it feels natural to say "we" to refer to us and the specific implementation we've built, but I see your point as to the feel of that language. Thanks for calling me out. Persona certainly has a scope beyond Mozilla, and its current state owes much to open collaboration.
I suppose a rouge developer can show their own login dialog box, but that is such a hack and should be pointed out by their boss, local paranoid (guess they are all gone?), or QA. They would have to capture the user's credentials and post it to the login handler themselves. Even the user might realize that it is not the login page and assume it is a phishing site.

The secret code for the encryption of the cookies is only installed on the login servers, and without that package installed, there would be no way to generate a valid signed cookie.

In short, there is no 100% guarantee a rouge developer could not do any damage, but it would be pretty hard to go unnoticed.
From my meagre experience, the biggest problem with IE6 and 7 (and to some extent 8) is incorrect layout.

Beyond very simple pages, it becomes almost impossible to get the same page to look even remotely the same on both IE6 and modern browsers. One solution I've seen used is to disable styles entirely on IE6 (and suggest Chrome Frame) and deal with IE7/8 quirks only.
As long as Microsoft will not implement the same features, in a similar time frame and in a compatible way as the other browser vendors they should be blamed and shamed.

The article says IE9 is a damn good browser without qualifying why they think that it is, I respectfully disagree.
As already pointed out, they use ultrasound to beam the energy, and they claim to have filed some patents applications. Alas, there's a ton of prior art in this space, and I wonder how they're going to navigate them.

For example, ultrasound is already used to wirelessly charge pacemakers:

http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2011/11/wireless-pace...

And here is a very pertinent patent in this space (2004) that also contains a nice review of prior art:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=508SAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&...

The central difficulty in this idea, as pointed out in the above patent, is automatically aiming a sufficiently focused beam at the receiver. Otherwise you get killed by 1/rˆ2 power decay. And this is a non-trivial task, which will force them to either go the royalties way or dodge the existing patents.

I don't doubt the team can move forward, but I wonder if the undergrads (and their investors) have underestimated the difficulty and history of the problem.

That being said, it's refreshing to see folks inspired by real-world problems that don't involve "social".

Wishing them best of luck!
Quick analysis of passwords of Yahoo Voice users leaked by D33D
There was no first and second, it's third world as in "third person". NATO, Warsaw Pact, everyone else.
I figured it might be good to add a couple of practical suggestions for folks using CTE's.

The first is don't be afraid of them. They are extremely powerful and you can do a lot with them. They can also go a long ways towards making code a lot more readable.

the second though is that they are optimization fences. Consequently you really want to do as much filtering in a CTE as you can. having a CTE that returns a very large result set is probably not a good idea. The smaller the amount of data returned the better.

This is particularly important with recursive CTE's because you are doing one additional scan per level of recursion, and it is having to go back and populate the returned set after each one. If you are generating a tree with millions of nodes you better have a heck of a lot of RAM and appropriate tuning done in advance. It's much better though if you can just render the portion of the tree you are interested in.
Well, they could have used caps lock. Very unlikely I know.
Bóng đèn Megaman
Megaman
Excerpts: THE MONEY SPIDERS, The Indictment
It will be supported on Version 1.9 but not further!
If I understand it correctly.
Yeah, the empty suits don't seem to stick around long. The interesting thing is that I've met at least one person I dismissed as an empty suit because of how he talked. My god, it was full of buzzwords. But, turns out, he's a fairly competent sysadmin; like, someone worth hiring, and I'm working with him on some projects.

I dono. I kinda enjoy seeing my prejudices being upturned. It reminds me that they are just prejudices, and are not to be trusted very far.
Reality of working on UK's 'X-Files'
Nike Air Max 2012 Men : Cheap nike air max outlet
Ex-Yahoo here. Anything on the yahoo.com domain uses the single sign on service. Yahoo doesn't distribute login cookies for the yahoo.com domain any other way.

That being said, the passwords are NOT stored in plain text. And individual properties don't get direct access to the user database. It's done through libraries and protocols with extremely restrictive ACLs. And one of the options isn't: "give me this user's password in plaintext".

Even if a Yahoo! property wanted to store user passwords, they couldn't. Every Yahoo! user logs in from login.yahoo.com.

Having a good understanding of how Yahoo!'s security is set up, I don't see how any of this is possible.

EDIT: It's starting to look (to me) as if those users got phished.
Tim Robinson joins Plan 28
Good Job,is very helpful.Thank!
That's part of why I always use a US layout, even on UK keyboards. Also because I've grown up with it.
I've found this to be very true in many ways when buying 'quality'. Buy 'quality' and not 'crap', and you will always be happier and the OP's statements are all true.

I think price is a poor estimator for quality since marketers know that price alone can signal quality, so it stands we need something beyond price.

How do we determine if something is quality when price is unreliable.
I've been dealing with this in quite a bit of detail in the last week. The answer is: it is entirely possible to write a Go program (or sub-programs, which is even better: use GC when you need it) that produces absolutely no garbage, and it doesn't require being a seer to do so. It requires a bit more seer-ness to leverage the fairly simpleminded escape analysis to make some things more terse, but that's a fairly small workflow optimization.

The biggest hurdle I've had is that the standard library can make it difficult to avoid allocation: for example, I want to re-initialize a "bytes.Reader" or "bytes.Buffer", but I can't just pass a new slice and reset the data structure fields, from what I know. As a result, I've had to do the somewhat unpleasant task of pulling in standard library files and then tweaking them, or writing new abstractions to do some low level stuff entirely -- perhaps unavoidable, it is probably better to have a nice interface for general cases from a standard library perspective.

It is worse when you realize that a standard library function calls "make" in a place where it'll be in your inner loop: you really wish you could pass the memory to scribble into instead.

Another surprisingly expensive thing is the dynamic dispatch on interfaces. This is easy to avoid if one just writes a specialized version of a function accepting all the concrete types in the common case, though. Beyond that, memory copying, something I've found that the bytes.Buffer and bytes.Reader make hard to avoid while still capturing their useful semantics.

All in all: more pleasant than C for most projects, and very nearly as fast when like this generally, so even if you end up having to write a good chunk of stuff yourself you are no worse off than if you had chosen C to begin with.

A very notable caveat: you can't handle in any way (afaik) failed requests for virtual memory, which is rather a killer for some kind of programs. This one makes me a bit annoyed, but I can see why it's difficult to address. That doesn't make me feel much better, though.

To give a sense of what I'm doing: I'm parsing very small messages (minimum: 5 bytes, and often quite small, a common pathological case would be a handful more bytes) and passing them on with no interesting processing, and trying to get this to be fast in the trivial case. This is the Postgres wire protocol. So far, Postgres is still beating the crap out of me, which is annoying considering it actually has to do some work, and I'm just inspecting one byte and one 4-byte word of the message and then passing it on. At this point, with two copies the program is ~20% runtime.memmove, so the next high pole is to eliminate one of the copies.
Groupon agrees to settle for $8.5M in class action law suit.
Ex-Yahoo and former local paranoid. I agree with you. That's so unlikely that I'd be willing to put money that it wasn't a rogue developer.
This because the iPhone offers a completely different user experience than a desktop browser.

IE is just another desktop browser with essentially no intrinsic value over the alternatives.
If it's on the yahoo.com domain then it has to go through the login servers. No one else can issue the Y/T cookies they use for authentication.
For most people, it goes like this: click on the Facebook login button, done. OR, click on personaID, have a new window open, enter email, enter password, go through setup, get back to site. This will be hard for most web users to adopt.
Yes, it's entirely possible that these were phished.
Thanks for the link. I remember being endlessly entertained by Gord's stories, I'll have to revisit them one of these days.
For iOS developers, this one reveals a lot of useful information about provisioning profiles:

http://www.macmation.com/blog/2011/10/quicklook-plugin-for-m...
Perhaps the best password I've found in this list is \0/

In the original SQL dump it also seems that some accounts don't have a password. I'm not sure how this is possible. For example:

334860:cashcratereferer@live.com:

vs. a normal entry

334868:ktomlinson7@yahoo.com:password
I'd love to see how Clojure compares, as it uses fewer parentheses and may even be competitive to, eg, Java in its use of parentheses.

As an aside, its interesting (to me, as a Colemak user) that all of the hot alphabetic characters in all the analyzed languages are on the home row of the Colemak layout (except L, which seems to be kind of hot in C++).