skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Anti-cheat is always an arms race. A modified image can report anything it wants to your surveillance.

That said, you can win that arms race for a while by doing something sufficiently innovative, different and specialized and you may have that here. I doubt this approach offers a permanent solution though.

Edit: I do think there is a lot to the idea of not trying to put all players through the same level of anti-cheat security. The anti-cheat needs of competitive players is very different from casuals and offering different levels of anti-cheat based on those levels. How amazing would it be if other games did the same and let players choose the level of anti-cheat to use and to require.
Azure, AWS and CPQ are all platforms that are good enough. If you need a cloud which is standing out and will be the best place for you workload over the next decade or more you have to look to OCI.
Is a "luxury studio" a real thing in NYC real estate or was this a joke?

The term itself sounds absurd and oxymoronic to me, but also I know NYC housing is absurd and I can imagine that there are places that do nice interior finishes on studio apartments and call them luxury so maybe it's real?
For the love of accessibility, why scrollbar on this website is as wide as a hair?
Thanks. If anyone has a link to results handy I'd be intersted. In particular a lot changes can be said to be 0-5% where the average is very close to 0...
Modern Data Stack – open-source Edition
Startups Get Their Own DC Advocate with Y Combinator's Luther Lowe
If I wanted to learn more about fuzzing, does anyone have suggestions?

I'd love to get to a point I could fuzz a program but the gulf of execution is vast -- I enjoyed attempting OSCP, but I can't keep paying for lab extensions.

(I also have a gut feeling there's a lot of unfuzzed apps which people don't look at because they're utilitarian and don't use the network much. So if I can phish you, then leverage some innocuous tool for RCE or whatever... useful.)

But I've struggled to find resources on this topic -- anyone know of a book, course, or wiki?
Lazygit Deep Dive
Author here

Fixed the RSS feed (and sitemap as well since both were not updated)
Those scripts were silently skipped since January

Apologies for the inconvenience, it should be updated now!
I know excatly how bad the output they give is, because I ask for output that I can understand, debug and improve.

People misusing tools don't make tools useless or bad. Especially since LLMs designers never claimed the compressed information inside models is spotless or 100% accurate, or based on logical reasoning.

Any serious engineer with a modicum of knowledge about neural networks knows what can or can't be done with the output.
Have you seen those "bamboo" bowls, and cups and whatnot being marketed as environmentally friendly?

They are obviously something like 70% plastic resin, 30% sawdust.
To me it boils down to what is to be measured here. With logprobs we can measure both correctness and not attempted i.e. if LLM is guessing the response.

Similar to exams where both the progress to the solution and the final outcome/value of the calculations are part of the grade.

To have the cake and eat it too for chain-of-thought reasoning, one way is to ask for a "final answer" so the final response token logprobs can be evaluated https://chatgpt.com/share/67239d92-b24c-800a-af8c-40da7be1f5...

Another trick is using JSON mode to keep intermediate results and final response separate, so each can be graded accordingly.
It’s not just a matter of values- culturally prescribed gender roles often override peoples personal values and goals. Women are more likely to be legally, socially, and/or biologically required to care for children (the last one refers to breastfeeding and pregnancy).

Men also experience more social pressure to be successful at work, or else are seen as not as worthy of respect as people or as romantic partners regardless of their personal goals and values.
Additionally, I think you may or may not be suspecting research malpractice. Obviously I don't have insider knowledge, but I would note that the idea of training probes in the middle layer of the model wasn't their idea. This paper cites other papers that already did exactly that. The contribution of this paper is simply that focusing on the middle layers for certain "critical tokens" gives a better signal than just checking the middle layers on every token.

It's of course possible that this paper in particular is fraudulent, but note that there is a field of research making the same basic claim as this paper, so this isn't some one off thing. A reasonable amount of people from different institutions would need to be in on it for the entire field to be fraudulent.

Alternatively, I think you may be objecting to the use of the word "truthfulness" in the abstract of the paper, because you seem to think that only human thoughts can possibly have a true or false value. I'm not actually going to object to the idea that only human thoughts can be true or false, but like the response I wrote to your koan comment, the user can interpret the LLMs output, which gives the user's thought a true or false value.

In this case, philosophically, you can think of this paper as trying to find cases where the LLM outputs strings that the user interprets as false. I think the authors of the paper are probably thinking about true or false more as a property of sentences, and thus a thing mere strings can possess regardless of how they are created. This is also a philosophically valid way to look at it, but differs from your view in a way that possibly made you think their claims absurd.
Even if the p < .05 threshold is removed, we’re still left with the important threshold of getting published or not getting published. Judging a paper by the quality of its statistical method won’t be enough to sort the publishable from the unpublishable in top journals. As a result, low p-values will continue to be favored and p-hacking will continue. To me it seems like a consequence of scarcity of academic positions and the tenure system.
That parody website responds like it is mining crypto in the background.

Not going viral when I can't share it in good conscience.
You literally contradicted yourself.
deleted tweets for reference:

https://i.imgur.com/u3cBdH1.png

https://i.imgur.com/PyaIMkA.png
That throws out anonymity. I don't see this getting approved, or people signing up for such studies, apart from those who don't care that there genetic data gets collected and stored.

Even if there is no name saved with the genetic sample, the bar for identification is low. The genes are even more identifying than a name after all. Worse, it contains deep information about the person.
I understand, but it's a pressing matter with regards to children. Their whole lives are over before they've started.

Maybe if a child shows great aptitude in some areas, and very poor aptitude in some others (which are currently highly valued), it shouldn't wreck their future.
In a prior career as a firefighter-EMT about 90% of the work was pure boredom and routine, 5% was in a sweet-spot of complex and interesting or perhaps mildly but reasonably dangerous. The balance was represented some really difficult-ugly or wildly dangerous moments. It’s interesting how prevalent this is across so many fields.
I think that is precisely why people, and myself, ate happy with Zed. I don't, personally, care for those kinds of features. I want something that is snappy, and bloat free. I beloved extensions are planned so that will come in time. I'm terms of inline error highlighting, it absolutely has that. is your LSP just not working correctly?
To be fair the paper that helped launch LLMs to a new level was from Google. “All You Need Is Attention”, Keras… They fell behind when it comes to marketing AI maybe…
Why is that suprising?

There is no logical reasoning happening, it has no concept of right and wrong, let alone that it can force a specific percentage of wrongness.
It wasn't an analogy.
Computers were much more expensive back in the days and would be obsolete much faster.

Nowadays for 50€ you can have a decent second hand computer with an older gen core i5 and 8 to 16GB of memory. That is plenty enough to run qubesOS.
I had some success using this for basic input, but never took it very far. It's meant to be customizable for that sort of thing though: https://talon.wiki/quickstart/getting_started/ (Edit: just the voice input part)
No, the other option is something like Sublime Text that has a small team working on it and is paid for by a very fair one-off payment by the customer.
VMware + All flash storage array + inline dedupe/compression = happy users.
A single brick on the ground, all by itself, is not a wall.

But if you take a lot of bricks and arrange them appropriately, then every single one of those bricks is wall.

In other words, just like the article points out down in the "dos" section, it depends on how you're treating that single unreplicated paper. Are you cherry-picking it, looking at it in isolation, and treating it as if it were definitive all by itself? Or are you considering it within a broader context of prior and related work, and thinking carefully about the strengths, limitations, and possible lacunae of the work it represents?
And while doing this, they fuck the whole market.
Quicker & easier isn't the end all be all–having distracting tech on my face is likely a net drag on my happiness, focus; given how distracting smartphones already are. It would have to be _so_ good that I'm willing to live with that extreme downside.
> I don't like your usage of word "Inshallah" as a mock up of the idea that something will never happen.

Oh, I read it differently (perhaps misunderstood). I interpreted the usage as "a required rote phrase/story rubber-stamped onto every piece". I understand how that, too, could be offensive, but I didn't see how inserting the literal meaning of the phrase made sense?
You can think of it like this:

- The characteristic function of a random variable X is defined as the function that maps t --> ExpectedValue[ exp( i * t * X ) ]

- Computing this expected value is the same as regarding t as a constant and integrating the function x --> exp( i * t * x) with respect to the distribution of X, i.e. if X has the density f, we compute the integral of f(x) * exp( i * t * x) with respect to x over the domain of f.

- on the other hand: computing the Fourier transform of f (here representing the density of X) and evaluating it at point t (i.e. computing (F(f))(t) if F represents the Fourier transform) is the same as fixing t and computing the integral of f(x) * exp( -i * t * x) with respect to x.

- Rearranging the integrand in the previous expression to f(x) * exp( i * -t * x), we see that it is the same as the integrand used in the characteristic function, only with a -t instead of a t.

Hope that helps :)
VMWare ESXi used to dedupe RAM and had to disable this by default because of a security issue it caused that leaded data between VMs.
Use Google Dorks to Find Your Dream Job
Ohhhh... I didn't know you could blacklist, thanks!
Netlify will not spend money to figure out a more lightweight process in order to stay further from the edges of DMCA. DMCA is too scary to play with, so just they transfer the cost and risk by making the affected party file the form.
80% or more of the code you write day to day is just grunt work. Boring code that has, for the most part, already been written in some form such that it was copied from Google or StackOverflow. AI is basically a shortcut to using that stuff..
>Despite widespread rumors, there is no verified evidence that Trump actually owns a gold toilet.

https://royaltoiletry.com/does-trump-have-a-gold-toilet-unpa...
This is why I frame it as a "snippets" plugin, rather than a Code generation tool.

I would be very confused if someone told me that they uncritically used the generated code from a snippet program with no manual input or understanding, and I feel the same with Copilot. At best, it suggests an auto-complete that I read and interpret before accepting.

The closest I come to "code generation" is during test writing, where occasionally I will let the description generate some setup, but only in tests where there are a broad number of examples to follow, and I am still going to end up re-writing a decent chunk of it based on personal example. I would not "let it write the test suite for me" and then trust the green, and I suspect that would easily fail code review (though it would be an interesting experiment...).

Obviously your comment as a good goof and well made, but it does speak to a little bit of the disconnect between what is being touted as an "AI coding tool" and how I, a person who makes react native apps to pay my rent, actually use the dang thing (i.e., "A pretty good snippets plugin"). Is My code 'AI generated'? I wouldn't call it that, but who can say definitively? We're in a fun new semantic world now.
Yeah, that's all fine, but the original claim was that:

> Metadata is holographic[0] to message content

...

> [0] X is holographic to Y when the contents of X can be used to completely reconstruct Y

To say something is holographic is a claim about data, not of value. I totally buy that metadata is valuable, it could even be more valuable than the contents, but it's not a means to reproduce the message content. My ISP can tell where I bank, which is certainly valuable to observers, but it can't tell my password or the contents of my accounts, all of which I transmit. That's not a holographic reconstruction.
The Control Freak is fantastic, but it doesn’t work all that well with some cast iron pans. I think there are a couple reasons:

1. Too much thermal mass and too little thermal conductivity. This causes poor feedback and unnecessarily high delay between heat being added and the measurement reflecting it.

2. Manufacturers love to cast their logo right in the bottom center, which means that the sensor doesn’t make good contact with the pan.

I wonder if someone makes a nice stainless-aluminum-carbon steel clad pan.
where do ypu order your parts?
No, it's not ok. It fucks the whole market by subsidizing the growth with VC money. Either a big company will buy them, consolidating their power, or they will IPO and the VCs will cash out and let the public bear the cost. It fucks the customers who are not as well-informed about this as you are. In summary, it fucking sucks.
I think you and the OP are agreeing with each other. The issue with a "single unreplicated paper" is exactly the issue you bring up with science as a journey. It's possible that this paper has found a genuine finding or that it is nonsense (people can find isolated published papers supporting almost anything they want even if they don't reflect the scientific consensus), but if no other researchers are even bothering to replicate the findings in it it hasn't joined the journey.
This doesn't match with the common knowledge on the topic, which is that model size is more important than the architecture. And training size is even more important, which is why single digit billion parameters are strongers than hundreds-of-billion ones from several years early when “Chinchilla optimal training” was in fashion.

SSM are literally the proof that all that really matters is training scalability.

The Universal approximation theorem doesn't care about the architecture after all.
dupeGuru works pretty well.
I would start with the AFL++ documentation (https://aflplus.plus/features/), and an open source program that you want to fuzz. The easiest programs to fuzz with AFL are ones that parse a file format from the command line, the smaller the better and written in C or C++ (just for ease of recompiling with instrumentation).

Parsing network protocols and ABIs is possible, but usually requires a fair amount of coding.
Truth Social Is Now Worth More Than X
Nah. English speakers use God-based exclamations from time to time but they generally do not pepper their sentences with "God willing", "praise God," etc like Arabs do.

That said, I do not care at all that Arabs used "God" a lot or that Americans (supposedly) use "war" a lot. If anything, I like these sorts of differences.
I used the dimensions of the Frankfurt kitchen for the design of the kitchen space in the studio apartments I designed.

The dimensions ended up being the only part of the Frankfurt kitchen I re-used. I Decided that the Frqnkfurt kitchen 2.0 would be mostly countertop and sink. The idea was that the rest of the system could be modified to the end user's taste.

The whole project has taken much longer than I expected but I'm now turning the corner. The next phase for me will be fabricating components that can be mixed and matched.

I will make a number of shelves and cabinets of different dimensions. The building will end up with catalog of objects that tenants can use or have modified to meet their needs.
few bits..

* the Edge-zone/s (yes, plural) are many, per-aspect. One can be pretty ok with one aspect and at-same-time-and-place totally not-ok with another aspect

* being in edge zone is kind-a learning.. training.. ("if it hurts, do it more often") the more often there, further the edge border will move (Extending the comfort zone). Of course depending where it started ; loading a twisted ankle as-usual-before-twisting isn't safe

* as saying goes: there's no cannot, there is do not want ; and there's no have to, only want to. But YMMV
Imagine The Onion but using only fake company names in its articles.

See also "satire is dead" meme.
Limiting parody by preventing trademarks is a terrible way to limit free speech. It is a slippery slope.
The 3 Body Problem wallfacers are a bit like this.

Some would freeze themselves to be thawed later to direct a several hundred year secret plan that only they know.
it's quicker and easier than ever to generate a project to send to the Google Graveyard.
The most successful open-source fork, worth $6B
It's worrying, yes, but we've had stackoverflow copy-paste coding for over a decade now already, which has exactly the same effects.

This isn't a new concern. Thoughtless software development started a long time ago.
As a physicist, the moment when everything just clicked was when I realised that connected Feynman diagrams were basically the cumulants of that distribution.
Then almost everything in physics is about "what is the characteristic/moment/cumulant generating function?" and associated Legendre transforms
except LLMs are trained on higher level languages. Good luck getting you LLM to write your app entirely in assembly. There just isn’t enough training data.
BYD have said they don't want to push export to countries where they are not wanted politically.

They seem quite engineering focused which seems to be serving them well.
What do you mean by 10x a growth rate? If it's at a CAGR of 15%, you think it needs to be 150%?

If so, I don't think you have the right numbers. We are on track to completely replace all current energy (not electricity, but final usable energy) uses with renewable electricity within 15 years at current growth rates.

Even the most rabid estimates of energy use growth rate are not more than a doubling of total energy services in that time period. And with the growth rate of renewables, we'd be able to adapt to that.

It is true that there is less paperwork for a new natural gas turbine than for most renewable energy, but you also have to get that pipeline of gas built too (which, again, has less paperwork than electric transmission, but you actually still have to do it). Other non-renewable energy isn't going to deploy any faster than renewable energy.
Only slightly related but on the topic of barcodes and security I'd like to recommend this excellent talk by Felix Lindner, it is quite a few years old but I'd guess stuff like barcode scanners are not the most frequently updated things:

Toying with barcodes - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCtdEYnlykA
I was trying to reference this famous video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWM_PgnoAtA
Nominative determinism proven again, someone named Fernhout became an ecologist.
If you just started heating the pan 20 years ago, you'd be good today without anyone telling you anything.
non c'est un pipe

Ability to generate words describing emotions are not the same thing as the LLM having real emotions
> and there's MAUI [2] ( not a fan of this), you are better-off with with the others.

I will say MS has been obsessed with trying to take a slice of the mobile pie.

However their Xamarin/WPF stuff left so much to be desired and was such a Jenga Tower that I totally get the community direction to go with a framework you have ostensibly have more control over vs learning that certain WPF elements are causes of e.g. memory leaks...
Will China return Mars samples to Earth before the US does?
So if a sweet spot exists where dedup is widely beneficial then:

Is there an easy way to analyze your dataset to find if you're in this sweet spot?

If so, is anyone working on some kind of automated partial dedup system where only portions of the filesystem are dedupped based on analysis of how beneficial it would be?
Drivers are generally not audited by Microsoft to be signed, you only need to register your EV cert to get it signed. Cheat developers have registered their own/gotten their hands on EV certificates to create a kernel driver cheats. Anti cheat like Battleeye also download anti cheat modules at runtime to obfuscate what they do.
I’m not interested in writing Emacs Lisp. It is not just the lack of LSP support, but also that after 6 hours of configuring, I don’t have an IDE that just works. VSCode, Zed and Neovim all have less legacy and fewer moving parts I need to be concerned about when starting from scratch.

In my opinion there is too much to fix for me to enjoy Emacs, compared to the alternatives.
That’s not how the mind works. People cheered when Elon fired 80% of the Twitter staff. No one cares when people with high paying jobs suffer.
> I don't believe people will resonate with robots making "um" and "ohs" because people usually resonate with an artist, a producer, a writer, a singer etc.

I think they absolutely will, because "resonating" is not a material phenomenon, it's something people decide that they're doing. Your connection with an actor on television is not an actual connection. Most of acting is learning the times and length to be silent while making a particular face (dictated by the director) in order for the audience to project feelings and thoughts onto you. You're thinking about your camera blocking, or your groceries, and your audience sees you thinking about some plot point in a fictional world.

I've got a theory that we severely damaged a generation of girls by inundating them with images of girls their own age singing songs and acting parts all written and directed by middle-aged men - ones who chose as a profession to write songs in the voices of, write fiction in the voices of, and to direct, photograph and choreograph in person, tween girls. Their models of themselves have come from looking at these depictions of girls, who were never allowed to speak for themselves, and resonating.
The "adult verson" looks like it has the same 30 second commercial, is OTC (no prescription-needed), and is only $130/year or $25 for just one month.

https://www.endeavorotc.com
How would you dissipate the heat generated from the eddy currents? You aren't just falling slowly, you're resisting gravity which causes work and that energy has to come from and go to somewhere.
OP wasn't using AI.

Personally, I think it shows an amount of dishonesty on the part of the applicant that I would absolutely take into account.