skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
To my mind one of the great benefits of LLMS is the possibility of searching without handing over some of the most personal information that exists - your search history.

I’m happy OpenAI is advancing LLM-based search but I won’t be using it in earnest until it’s local.
I genuinely don't understand why job boards have to be so fragmented. The article mentions five different boards I've never even heard of.
How will this be gamed for neo-seo spam?
Most players don't use Steam Deck or Linux.
And? This is an information trivially obtainable in a different way (e.g. using a stopwatch), while flamegraphs visualise where that time was spent, helping us to determine the parts that need to be optimised.
My point is you attribute the entirety of success to to theft, and I think there is a lot more to it. At a minimum, there is the ability to defend and retain what was taken. There is also the ability to utilize the resources one possesses.

The answer to the question "why Americans are so rich" is obviously much much bigger (and more interesting) than that they stole resources from indigenous people.

>That was not the intention, sorry if you felt offended.

What was the intention? I thought you were just being a dismissive asshole, ignoring the rest of a post. Was it a joke that fell flat? were you planning to come back and engage with the other six sentences later?
OpenAIs press release game is unreal. This totally overshadowed Google’s grounding release in my feeds.
I wouldn't be surprised if it is powered by something Microsoft-made, or anything else for that matter.

Their web browsers are just web view wrappers, their search engine itself is just Bing.
One of the perks of dropping ESXi is that I no longer have to navigate the VMWare website. That site is an abomination, with dead ends, login loops, dead links, and a million more issues.

Proxmox isn’t perfect, but it has a lot going for it.
The whole issue that site owners have with these AI search engines is that there isn't a financial incentive for them to cooperate, since the summarization largely replaces the need for users to click through to the site the information came from. No click-through, no ad impressions, no possibility of the user being converted into a recurring visitor or paid subscriber, just pure freeloading by the search engine.
The colloquial difference is a few lines, maybe a dozen or two, for maintenance and one off stuff, not a full blown application.
I’m assuming this refers to things analogous to dependabot on GitHub where maybe it automatically updates a library version reference and runs the tests and creates a PR if everything seems good, or similarly for fixing style issues or other stuff that is pretty trivial and has good test coverage.

When you maintain an open source project on GitHub you will occasionally get some open source automated bot that submits a PR to do things like this without you even asking, and I’m sure there’s plenty more you can sign up for or implement yourself.

I wouldn’t really call it AI, but it is automated. I agree with the parent comment that a journalist trying to push an angle would probably lump it in as AI in order to make the number seem larger.
There’s a spectrum of insensitivity, all the way from “I’ll die” (celiac), to “I get migraines/etc.” (classically insensitive), to “if I have a lot I feel real bad” (perhaps more folks than they realize).

Pancake batter is characterized by lots of flour and baking soda, if it’s not one it’s likely the other.
I would be surprised if this doesn’t take share out of google’s pie
Are you plus or team user and logged in? The link is to the normal chatgpt prompt, but with the "Search" button enabled.
No clue honestly. I usually use something like sunflower oil to maintain wooden utensil. This is what Opinel recommend for their knife, although it is more for the metal locking mechanism.
A new front has been opened in the SEO wars.
Not long before it's forbidden by law with rules like “if you say the name of one brand, you must name at least two competitors” I suspect.
OpenAI's search engine is now live in ChatGPT
They are taking a page out of Microsoft’s strategy of clouding out all sunlight.
At least for this instance you have a good idea which objects are "ripe" for collection. There should be some way to specify "collect these, my infra objects don't need to be".
Care to elaborate? I don’t see any connection between the two.
It's bad for one's career as an executive to accept any responsiblity. It's always the market to blame. See the 3 envelopes joke.
But how do you measure "value"? "Value" has a large subjective and ephemeral aspect to it that can't readily be expressed in purely monetary terms.

You can't answer your question until you know who your target audience is, what problems they have that you're trying to solve, and how much those problems are costing them (in money, time, and annoyance). A thing may have no value at all to one person, but have enormous value to another. Finding your market is really just locating the audience who is bothered by the problem your product or service is solving.
>It's not thinking

>it compressed the internet into a clever, lossy format with nice interface and it retrieves stuff from there.

Humans do both, why can't LLM's?

>Chain of thought is like trying to improve JPG quality by re-compressing it several times. If it's not there it's not there.

More like pulling out a deep-fried meme, looking for context, then searching google images until you find the most "original" JPG representation with the least amount of artifacts.

There is more data to add confidently, it just has to re-think about it with a renewed perspective, and an abstracted-away higher-level context/attention mechanism.
People want whatever they searched for. If the ads provide that, then sure. That's why Google and Meta are the size that they are...
Stainless steel can and will stick to some food, but a good one can hold very high amounts of heat and will heat up very evenly.

I think at the end, it boils down to cooking style and preference. We use both (non-stick and stainless steel), and some foods are easier to prepare in one w.r.t to other, however, nothing is impossible in either.

All non stick coatings require care though. Never scrape with metal, do not wash in the dishwasher, and do not overheat.

The rule 0 of item maintenance is, "if you care for your item, your item cares for you when you need it".
Y-DNA and mtDNA haplogroup are good definitions though. They just don't map exactly to vernacular concepts.
oh, that's a good point. There are definitely more drivers globally than there are people in New York and you can break speed limits several times per trip just by floating around the limit +/- 1mph.
Same! (asking it to write code for the foss lib I maintain). This is immediately very useful.
The authentic Windows XP experience!
I really don't see the value of summarizing/repackaging web search hits. Given that 99% of SEO-tuned web content is just shilling for vendors who don't want to be seen, LLM search summarization will just repackage those ads into a more palatable format that is LESS useful than the original, while more successfully hiding the obvious signatures that used to be a clear warning sign that... THE.FOLLOWING.CONTENT.IS.MANIULATIVE.CRAP.
> In a socialist society, where some things are funded by the government, those things are generally much more aligned with the interest of the public than in capitalism

Just for fun, compare the Soviet built Lada cars with cars built by capitalists. Or the contents of supermarkets. Or the quality of health care.

Oh, and the advice given to American tourists visiting the Soviet Union - pack a couple pairs of blue jeans, as they are great for trading for stuff!

I'll make it easy - name any consumer product made by the Soviet Union that was preferable to one built by greedy capitalists. Did you wonder why the US did not import Soviet made consumer products?
The plan to control what a persistent cheater does to their own device is more than 5 decades of straight failures.

Just one more client anti-cheat measure bro. Just one ring lower bro.

I'm not sure what I find more terrifying: the persistence of the NSA & Disney lobby for subverting root control in all devices, or that so many people mindlessly agree its the right direction to go and their world will be a better place for it.
P-value doesn't measure interestingness. If p>0.05 there was no result at all.
Wow so many comments that just don't get the criticism and want to continue with their magical beliefs about null hypothesis testing.

This is a damning criticism of the most common techniques used by my scientists. The answer isn't to shrug and keep doing the same thing as before.
This sounds like a human rights disaster project with optional plans for a future genocide expansion.
People just need to lie more often. In many cases, they will not verify anything. If they require proof, you can say everything was a verbal offer with no official documentation. That's often how it is because many recruiters don't want to go through the paperwork process before there's an agreement.

That said, I've found the "competing offer" element to be of little to no value. Even when I had 7 competing offers, not one of them negotiated more than maybe 10% on the amount. The one that gave me the largest bump didn't even need to know about competing offers - they just wanted to know what would get me to sign. I said X and they did it.
> If you want to find an incentive to get undeserved attention

I think social media - such as HN comments that shoot down almost every OP without fail - is by far the best example? Most comments on social media on such things seek attention for being smarter-than-though and have no basis in anything, including the comment at the top of this thread by 'gidmkhealthnerd'.

> All the opposite of the academic world.

The pure academic world and the evil Media! If you're an academic, maybe we can something better than joining the mob against the bogeyman.
Do you let random people use your car for free, too? Do you pay for their gas as well?
We can all agree Unity is terrible.

Would be nice to hear about a Rust Game engine, though.
That'll be the European version.
I can see your point. I think I'm convinced. Thanks!
Is Tesla or BYD seeing waning demand or just Ford?

Hmm... seems Tesla is flat over the last few years: https://www.reuters.com/graphics/TESLA-DELIVERIES/gkvlbmzmev...
You’re saying that now, but getting the initials in “ChatGPT” in the right order took a while to learn, so I wouldn’t say it’s easy to remember, and it seems easy to stumble saying it, too?

It’s all about familiarity. Once people learn it, it’s not hard.
I think most experienced Ruby engs tend to think of code as existing within a runtime which is one global space with many nested (and parallel) execution states and rationalizing what's happening in static code means simulating that runtime in your head and navigating around it up, down and sideways.

This may seem like something all languages require but the way it works for me in Ruby is much different than when I am writing JS or Python. It's kind of hard to explain.
> The OOBE started, but what an experience it was! This wasn’t an experience. This was pure madness!

Very enjoyable. I was overjoyed seeing shots of 3D pinball.
Over the past two decades, ads have proven to be the only way to make money over the internet…
Imo C++ only makes sense if you commit enough time. If you are not planning to work with it as an expert I would look somewhere else.

I dont want to comment about rust, but personally I just don't like ideological people. Also some people seem to not understand, that the set of all valid computer programs is greater than the set of all programs that can be proved correct. It is a fact and can be proven.

Imo C# is a well designed language and would be the best start to learn more about a modern statically typed language. Swift is also interesting, but its mostly apple and has similiar ideologic problems like rust (e.g. pointers are evil).
AI #88: Thanks for the Memos
Can confirm this as well. I switched to free around a month ago and got access to this today. I did join the waitlist some weeks ago.
You are thinking you can pay them to not use your data? Think again. They will sneakily use your data anyway. If not yours, then the data of people who do not change setting xyz. Oops, the last update must have reset that option for some users.
raindrop.io tool would do the job for you. It does not automatically tag and categorize but you can easily do that yourself with this tool that has a very small learning curve. It has both free and paid plans.
Please give up in private and not spread your apathy across the internet.
Ask HN: What's the best resource to catch up with ML and LLMs?
I felt like there are too many resources and they were rather scattered . For example i found good articles about explaining transformers and for embeddings but i felt like there were information/steps missing .I tried searching for k means and i found about it but i feel disconnected . I am looking for something that is structured but no too advanced for a full fledged ml engineer .
That RFC is for infinite. This article discuses finite.
Unsure if anyone has made a game specifically for that. But there are plenty of intentionally unsecure servers (no VAC, or other anti-cheat) in games like counter strike for Hacker vs Hacker.
They might wait a whole week.
Would the film Idiocracy have been as funny if instead of making fun of Costco, Starbucks, and Carls Jr., they referred to them as Costinc, Sunbucks, and Carlos Sr.?

Parody doesn't necessarily require that you make significant alterations to a symbol or name. Only imbeciles would think that the fictional "Fuck you - I'm eating" slogan actually represents the Carls Jr. company in real life.
I don't know who the Hunter Ash person is but the author should consider that the people claiming to vote Trump to protect free speech, may well just be liars that want to suppress opposing speech. Like Elon and Twitter.

edit: looked them up on Twitter. Several post about the genetic IQ deficiencies of other races and how this will soon lead to the end of Western Civilization and they'll side with armed bullies over violence-avoiding academics because the end justifies the means if you are saving civilization, then:

> Freedom of speech absolutely must include the freedom to spread racial hatred. Otherwise, the state can define anything they want to censor as “spreading racial hatred”. If free speech is not absolute, it does not exist at all

So, a real fun character.
I’m surprised at all the negativity on perplexity. I think it’s a great approach (base answers on sources) and their product seems to deliver on the premise.

That said, anecdotally, I find it’s a bit hit-miss: if it’s hit it’s a huge improvement over google (and a minor improvement over chatgpt), if it’s miss it’s still good but get the feeling you won’t get anywhere further by asking more questions.
You’re probably right, but I meant generative in the sense of building a machine that does the entire process.
Thanks for the idea. I've had to stop focusing on learning React because I found I didn't know enough JavaScript so I'm not confident enough to post any gist about anything presently. I did a JavaScript course 10 years ago after finishing CS50 online but due to a sudden change in family circumstances I had to take a long break from learning programming.

However, thanks to cline, aider, supermaven and v0, I decided that I could now learn enough JavaScript/React/React Native to pair program with AI code generation tools and replace the need for a technical co-founder going forwards.

I'm about halfway through the freecodecamp JavaScript Course and so far so good. The AI code generation tools for VS Codium are insane and I'm certain I'll be launching webapps and mobile apps in no time.
How is this different from RAG using a search API? I didn't get their blurb about this being a standalone fine-tuned model.
I never understood this argument. Would you eat a credit card? I mean, why not, you eat a credit cards worth of microplastics a week per this article:

https://www.reuters.com/graphics/ENVIRONMENT-PLASTIC/0100B4T...

So let me ask you again. Its Friday. You have a rib eye, asparagus, and an old credit card on your plate. I’m sure you would not eat a credit card, and would think people were insane for doing so.

So why not try and avoid it if you can. Sure you can’t avoid everything but if you can avoid some things in your control why wouldn’t you?
Yeah, maybe – don't recall the precise quote off-hand. But the gist of it was "I need very little help from a chess computer to have a huge advantage".
https://archive.is/nQWAn
It strongly depends on which plastic. PVC is the really nasty one.
> Honestly, if I can disable ads by paying them, then I'm ok with it.

The modern maxim is: any content platform large enough to host an ad sales department will sell ads

Vanishingly few (valuable) consumers have zero tolerance for ads, so not selling ads means leaving huge sums of money on the table once you get to a certain scale. Large organizations have demonstrated that they can't resist that opportunity.

The road out is to either convince everyone to have zero tolerance for ads (good luck), to just personally opt for disperse, smaller vendors that distinguish themselves in a niche by not indulging, or to just support and use adversarial ad blockers in order to take personal control. Hoping that the next behemoth that everybody wants to use will protect you from ads is a non-starter. Sooner or later, they're going to take your money and serve you ads, just like the others.
Collecting people's data and making money from that.
It used good sources but appeared not to extract the information correctly.

Repeating the same query in the same chat session gave me an accurate answer.
You should be able to remove `restrict` in any valid C program and still compile it and run it with the same result, no? Adding `restrict` can make otherwise valid code UB if there's aliasing, but the reverse shouldn't ever appply.
Overheat your Teflon pan, take a good huff, wait a few hours and post that comment again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer_fume_fever

”When PTFE is heated above 450 °C the pyrolysis products are different and inhalation may cause acute lung injury. Symptoms are flu-like (chills, headaches and fevers) with chest tightness and mild cough. Onset occurs about 4 to 8 hours after exposure to the pyrolysis products of PTFE.”

There is basically no safe limit for these chemicals — EPA limit for drinking water is 4 ppt. U.S. residents already have average blood PFAS levels to the tune of 4000 ppt.
How do you know which person is the pseudo-intellectual. At least one gained professional expertise in chemistry and did an actual scientific experiment. The other posted their 'opinion' on Threads saying it is all wrong.
Tried to do some online research (heh) and it would appear that satire of public figures is just straight up protected by the first amendment. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell
Elon Musk is single-handedly tanking the EV market with his over-promising and under-delivering.
Don't Americans also have rules about hidden advertising like that in regular media?
I wish there was a model for anti-cheat that wasn't "grant irrevocable full control of your hardware via rootkit to the developer and anti-cheat manufacturer via a secure boot chain that you're not allowed to touch (on your device!)"

I don't think trust is a bad thing, but this feels forced and unpleasant.
The government has totally said “destroy the thing that we said was legal to manufacture, purchase, and own when it was manufactured.” That was the entire point of the bump stock ban, which attempted to reclassify an item that they had previously said was not a machine gun into a machinegun, and therefore illegal to own (and was always illegal to own, so they weren’t going to compensate people for them either).

More strictly, machine guns aren’t banned by the federal government, but rather you have to have paid a tax to own it, and they’ve banned paying the tax for gun made after X date. If they decide to ban the ownership, grandfathering is not guaranteed.
Your interview experience at one company isn’t representative of the entire industry.
Haha I already do!
I think free to play is where the market has ended up.

I get it, though, I kind of stopped playing competitive games after it became all about the F2P grind. Even cosmetics-only F2P hits a part of my brain that I try keeping in check. I just play single-player and cooperative games now.
Tesla just had a phenomenal quarter so no, this is just the mediocre overpriced EV's being sold at a loss by legacy auto.
DTU Researchers discover one of the fastest-spinning stars in the Universe
That then is delivered and not used in the warzone. Its to expensive dor the front,it belongs into a museum .
I still don't understand why people would think EVs would succeed as quickly in America, as they are in Europe and China.

France is a little smaller than Texas. If you live in France, how often are you driving to Portugal, Belgium, or Germany? Not often. The maximum amount of range you will ever drive is quite constrained.

How often do Americans go on road trips from Minnesota to California, or from California to New York, or from Minnesota to Mexico, or from Montana to Florida? All the time, by comparison. Some will do it multiple times per year. People buy cars with the maximum in mind, not the average.
I think you’re being very generous with these 2 years.
No, he was not realizing that. Was wondering if that's the case. The realization comes later with understanding NT vs FAT conversion that was happening. Hence why the upgrade route via W2000
In the automotive world, US cars are the ones who have an image of poor quality. GM, Ford, and Tesla are routinely viewed as shoddy and suspiciously built.
I'm sorry but generating logic from tautologies is not useful. And the conclusion is irrelevant to me. The method is flawed.
They did not - it is still a work in progress with no announced target release date. They also have no current plans to upgrade the GC being used by IL2CPP (their C# AOT compiler).

https://discussions.unity.com/t/coreclr-and-net-modernizatio...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Daniel%27s_Properties,_In...

Jack Daniels won because the maker of the dog toys were selling them, and wanted a trademark themselves.

Here we're talking about activists making non-commercial parody usage; the EFF's letter already mentions the Lanham Act, and let us add to that the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark_Dilution_Revision_Ac...) which adds an express fair-use defense for noncommercial use.
Are the skilled players plugged into communities enough that they can just make their own servers? It would be some extra work, but I assume time spent getting to know each other wouldn't feel like a total waste, and might be greatly preferable to dealing with all these rootkits.
Exactly, I'm surprised at the people applauding this behavior. It's barely an evolution in fooling the ATS and speaks more about the character of the applicant than his skills. While I agree that the current hiring landscape is crazy if we condone this behavior what would be the next step? Doxxing the interviewer(s) and telling them the names of his family members and where they live during the interview?
I went to a meeting the other day in a building with a touch screen registration system. The woman in front of me was struggling with it. Every time she tapped the register button the system decided that some part of her was a badly formed barcode, printed an error message and exited back to the menu. She eventually got it working by moving to the side until it wanted to take her picture.