skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is incredible! There’s just something so different about “live” TV compared to a bunch of videos you scroll through. Everything has been about control and overabundance, but there’s so much value in not having to always decide, of just sitting back and watching what comes to you. Probably the best way to discover new things too. How do you get around ads? Any possibility of an Apple TV app? Would be worth $10 easily, if not a monthly subscription.
I can tell you’ve never worked with a competent manager. They are required because building the wrong thing is worse than not building anything at all
Which part of General Data Protection Regulation in GDPR don't you understand?
This may be annoying, but it’s uploading encrypted versions of passwords, not passwords themselves. Keychain is end-to-end encrypted so no one else can read them.
One person's measured response is another person's propaganda.
Rewrite it in Rails
But it will radically increase the energy requires to deliver search results, which means more datacenters and more potential for the monitization of "premium" search services. Getting people to pay for something they today get for free always looks good on paper.
That's odd. Here's an example that worked for me:

> [Prompt] Can you browse the web to find out what lenses pair well with a Sony ZV-E10?

> [Response] The Sony ZV-E10 is well-suited to a variety of lenses, depending on your shooting needs. [snip]
Perhaps convoluted for average user, but for me it's on-demand VPN + proxy + DNS with heavy filtering on NS and proxy.

All my devices are connected to it all the time.

Works great with no issues for many years.
If a strategy is clearer orally than on paper, something is very wrong. Either you're getting bamboozled by charisma and a bad plan is getting a fake dress up OR they don't know how to write.
I tried doing something like that: https://gettjalerts.com/

I added semantic search, but I'm workin on adding resume upload/parsing to do automatic matching.
Would software that more accurately emulates a CD drive be preferable?

Virtual CloneDrive will run The Sims (and other early SafeDisc titles) without issue. By contrast I don't believe that any emulator (QEMU/Virtualbox/DOSbox/etc) handle the weird I/O calls that DRM makes
Yes, email, drive, sheets, meet.
I’m not using Cursor because I don’t want my code to go through yet another middleman I’m not sure I can trust. I can relatively safely put my trust in OpenAI, but Cursor? Not so sure. How do I know they’re secure?
Except I also pay my network provider to run the infrastructure

I think you forgot that
ADHD coaching is as proven as regular life coaching - not at all. It's done by people who want that therapist money without having to bother with getting a degree or being a practitioner in a regulated industry. The ADHD coaching space is particularly predatory in my experience.
I don't love this idea. I feel like it's just going to force even more busybody work into the process - now companies will need to "respond" to every applicant, no matter how irrelevant, so that response isn't going to be high-information anyway.

Someone else suggested a good idea - make companies link to their previous request. Or even better - don't allow companies to post the exact same listing for months in a row. The actual behavior you're trying to root out is a company listing a position that isn't real - so just don't allow them to list the same not-real position over and over.

I don't know if that can be enforced, though it should be easy to script up something that checks this. But you're not going to enforce anything anyway, and I think this gets closer to actually what we want to achieve.
disjoint union is sum type / enum / algebraic data type. Defined at the point of declaration. Each case is distinct (hence, disjoint)

union is what Typescript has. Defined at the point of use. Cases need not be distinct.
Think of the 'impressive hacks' used in realtime 3D rendering as compression techniques to reduce bandwidth (and this goes all the way back to 8-bit home computers with their tricky video memory encoding, this was essentially hardware image compression to reduce memory bandwidth).

Why waste computing power on 'physically correct' algorithms, when the 'cheap hacks' can do so much more in less time, while producing nearly the same result.
LLVM ships with a fuzzing library, docs at https://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html. I get the impression that AFL is considered better. The authors of llvm fuzz stopped working on it in favour of some other thing, which they then stopped working on in favour of https://github.com/google/fuzztest, which seems to be broadly useless as a fuzzer implementation. But whatever, the llvm fuzzer lives on and has uses in tree and occasional updates. I found it much easier to get started with than AFL.

I wrote a program that takes a byte array as input and drives the library under test with it, attached that to llvm's fuzzer and left it running. You end up with a lot of files containing some bytes that did something vaguely interesting with the program. Good experience overall.

You might get some meaning out of https://github.com/JonChesterfield/bigint/tree/trunk/fuzz_bi... but ymmv, I got sidetracked by interesting stuff at work ~3 months back and don't currently remember what state that repo was in when I paused work on it.
I wonder why this one is not higher up, as the blocking works like a charm

I do have problems updating it on my MacBook though
>> It is a little know fact that you can actually swap out the GC of the runtime. So you could plug in a null implementation

How do you do this? Just so I can have another tool in my tool shed. Googling got me to an archived repo on GitHub with a sample GC - which is enough but Wonder if there’s something off the shelf.

In java land, the Epsilon GC (a do nothing GC) enables a pattern that’s handy in perf test jobs in CI pipelines occasionally for some projects (I.e. run with epsilon but constrain max memory for the process - ci builds will fail if memory usage increases)
I'm storing a lot of text documents (.html) which contain long similiar sections and are thus not copies but "partial copies".

Would someone know if the fast dedup works also for this? Anything else I could be using instead?
I used Orgmode for years, but I think fundamentally tieing your markup to your editor is kind of a bad sign... I'd be curious to hear counterarguments though. I think the primary reason it's tied is because you sort of can't make standalone ELisp apps (or at least nobody does). Otherwise you'd just have an `org2html` and `org2pdf` application at the command line.

Alternatives like Asciidoc are not perfect, esp for literate programming, b/c it's also kinda complex and so it also only has one backend (that's runnable from Clojure through JRuby!). I imagine a simpler multi-backend solution like Djot will be the future most likely. Bloated underspeced markups are on the way out.
That's why you're seeing media companies making deals with companies like OpenAI to allow them to access their content for AI learning/parsing purposes, in exchange for the media company getting paid yearly royalties.

Since anyone creating content (whether that's a big media corp or a small cooking blog) holds copyright over their content, they get to withhold the permission to scrape their content unless these AI platforms make a deal with them.
It currently wouldn't matter for the US, since it's one of the few country doing worldwide taxation of its citizens.
> fundamentally and irretrievably break the economics of the web

Good riddance, it is a surefire way to get slop by having misaligned incentives for publication.
Hi! I hope your diagnosis goes smoothly.

Feel free to tell me to go away, but here's some unsolicited advice.

I have ADHD and I'd highly recommend you avoid coaching. You're better off seeing a qualified, registered, regulated practitioner, especially at these prices. Therapy will help you build better coping mechanisms and all that. Coaching is a predatory scam that has just exploded recently.

As someone who relies on body doubling, phoning a friend for five minutes is free and does the job. There's even discord servers for this as well. I've hired support workers in short bursts for this as well. For the low key stuff like that there's so many options that are lower cost or free, and are honest about the benefits. See a therapist for all the other stuff.

I really hope you find supports that work for you regardless. Good luck!
> How did you infer that? I specifically said in another comment that I'm not negating evolution, just the part about speciation-by-random-mutation.

So do you agree that species change by evolution, e.g. selection acting on random mutations?
Embeddings are the only aspect of modern AI I'm excited about because they're the only one that gives more power to humans instead of taking it away. They're the "bicycle for our minds" of Steve Jobs fame; intelligence amplification not intelligence replacement. IMO, the biggest improvement in computer usability in my lifetime was the introduction of fast and ubiquitous local search. I use Firefox's "Find in Page" feature probably 10 or more times per day. I use find and grep probably every day. When I read man pages or logs, I navigate by search. Git would be vastly less useful without git grep. Embeddings have the potential to solve the biggest weakness of search by giving us fuzzy search that's actually useful.
On desktop and server machines probably not. But more code also means a bigger attack surface.
You might also like the org-babel features of creating executable code-blocks. You can even mix languages by using the output of one block as the input to another. Welcome to the future of 2012 ;)
I made one such document a while back with mostly Clojure, if you want to have a look: https://github.com/dnv-opensource/reagent-flow/
Yeah, RAIDZ1 is a reasonable trade-off for the four disks.

Move your NVMe to the other slot, I bet you can't tell a difference without synthetic benchmarks.
https://itep.org/debunkinglaffer/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/06/01/trump-is-...
(Archive: https://archive.is/eVC1X )

"Economists tend to roll their eyes when the Laffer curve is mentioned. A panel of elite academic economists across the political spectrum found in 2012 that none of its respondents agreed that the United States was on the wrong side of the curve. Even George Stigler, a leader of the Chicago School of Economics who disliked taxes at least as much as Laffer, described the Laffer curve as “more or less a tautology.”"
It would be very odd if I have to speak to an LLM the same way I “speak” to Google. The point of this whole feature seems to be that the LLM chooses when and how to search to best respond to the user.
Why do you need to 'pledge' that. What BS. As a parent you can just decide to do so, no need to get anyone else involved.

Personally I'd make it dependent on the child's maturity. I was very mature at young age and my parents would let me travel on the train to other cities.
You can easily fix this using embedding arithmetic to build embedding classifiers.
I don't think this is comparable to the US.

First, the US has worldwide taxation for its citizens. No matter where you go, they can track your bank accounts (through FATCA) and tax you. It really sucks if you're just a middle-class expat somewhere, but the system was really designed to make sure rich Americans were paying their taxes. However, it's causing a growing number of not-rich Americans living overseas to renounce their citizenship. Regardless, it can still be used here. The billionaires would have to not only move out, but also renounce, and doing this currently carries a large "exit tax" if you have huge assets.

Secondly, where exactly are super-rich Americans going to go? Super-rich Norwegians have lots of options a very short trip away, since they live right next to the EU. It's not that hard for them to pack up and move to Sweden or Denmark where the taxes are still quite high, but without the explicit wealth tax. With super-rich Americans, it's not quite so simple: other desirable countries will have significantly higher overall taxation, even if there's no explicit wealth tax, so it would really depend on exactly how high this new tax is. Sure, they could move to Russia, but I don't think that's a place that American billionaires want to move to.
> ...24 tons at say 30m above...

And also the weight of full, rain-drenched sails. And a few crew aloft, fiddling with those sails. And...
What if the tax is applied at the state level ?
Maybe we should put rich people's money in cages when it crosses borders rather than poor people?

Admit it, it would be more fun to see a billionaire strapping life vests to stacks of cash in the hope of seeing it arrive safely via a shoddy inflatable craft than to see drowned small children face down in the sand.
You have to pretend the DIY is free, or even fun. Boat people are usually not cheap to hire.
> and only be used as a source for some company's profit?

Are we forgetting the main beneficiaries? The users of LLM search. The provider makes a loss or pennies on million tokens, they solve actual problems. Could be education, could be health, could be automating stuff.
An org mode syntax I use heavily that I rarely see mentioned, including in this cheat sheet, is the obscurely named Radio Targets. Enclose any term or phrase in <<<tripple angle brackets>>>, hit C-c C-c on it, and then any previous or further instance of it in the same buffer will be automatically linked to it from then on. Incredibly useful when you're wroting notes on a long book for example and want to keep track of the instance when a term was defined. Turns an org file into its own wiki.

https://orgmode.org/manual/Radio-Targets.html
Canada ?
A) Cookware is expensive

B) Unless you scratch the hell out of your pan the teflon coating (probably) isn't that bad

C) Cooking on a teflon pan is just so much more pleasurable
… on incomes.

This article is talking about wealth tax. And specifically mentions policies around unrealized capital gains tax.

So it would matter a lot for many people in America, and California specifically.
Yet 300M users are creating interactive sessions on chatGPT, which can be food for self improvement. AI has a native way to elicit experience from users.
Hi, I never had a LinkedIn account or profile. Been working professionally for more than 15 years. It’s a good way to avoid distractions. You might miss on being told about opportunities, but other than that, are you sure you’re being cancelled for not having one?

When I interview, I often ask the recruiter to share the cv, portfolio, and GitHub/other. As they often just share a LinkedIn URL but that’s up to the interviewer and team to decide if enough to compromise theirs and the candidates time.
I'm pretty sure Canada has higher taxes than the US for people in this tax bracket. And again, they'd have to move all their assets and renounce their citizenship, after somehow acquiring Canadian citizenship.
Almost entirely because of free movement of capital/people and not because the tax had a negative impact on productivity.
Wasn’t there like a country with some absurd exit tax like 50% or something? That would stop capital flight too.
Only if you make a very decent amount of money, like more than $100k USD a year. In the US this may not seem like much, but you'd be surprised how little e.g. developers make in countries like Germany or Poland.
Yeah for me too. When I was young I was very active in chatboxes on local BBSes. There was no internet yet for normal people.

It would have been terrible if my parents would have banned that. But they were very progressive luckily.
Want to see my ... Laffer curve?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Laffer
chatGPT puts trillions of tokens into human heads per month, and collects extensive logs of problem solving and outcomes of ideas tested there. This is becoming a new way to circulate experience in society. And experience flywheel. We don't need blogs, we get more truthful and aligned outcomes from humna-AI logs.
I like this regex, which divides a number by sqrt(2):

(?=(x(x*)).*(?=\1*$)\2+$)(?=(x\1)+(x?(x*)))(?=\4(x(x*?))\1+$)(?=.*(?=(?=\4*$)\4\5+$)(x*?)(?=\3*$)(x?(x*?))(\1+$|$\9))(?=.*(?=(?=\4*$)(?=\6*$)(?=\4\7+$)\6\5+$|$\4)(x*?)(?=\3*$)(x?(x*?))(\1+$|$\13))(?=.*(?=\12\12\9$)(x*?)(?=\3*$)(x?(x*?))(\1+$|$\17))(?*.*?(?=((?=\3*(x?(x*)))\21(x(x*?))\1+$)))(?=.*(?=\23*$)(\23\24+$))(?=.*(?=(?=\21*$)\21\22+$)(x*?)(?=\3*$)(x?(x*?))(\1+$|$\27))(?=.*(?=(?=\21*$)(?=\23*$)(?=\21\24+$)\23\22+$|$\21)(x*?)(?=\3*$)(x?(x*?))(\1+$|$\31))(?=.*(?=\30\30\27$)(x*?)(?=\3*$)(x?(x*?))(\1+$|$\35))(?=.*(?=\26\26)(?=\3*(x*))(\1(x)|))(?=.*(?=\34\34\40)(?=\3*(x*))(\1(x)|))(?=(?=(.*)\13\13\17(?=\6*$)\6\7+$)\44(x+|(?=.*(?!\16)\41|(?!.*(?!\38)\8).*(?=\16$)\41$))(\25\31\31\35){2}\43$)\20|xx?\B|

Source: https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/a/198428
High taxes and strict regulation do have a negative impact on job and income growth in much of Europe, though.
It is a tautology, so I'm not sure why people get annoyed about it. If you look at the curve, it just says the government will get 0 revenue at either 0% or 100% taxes, and the maximum is somewhere in the middle. It doesn't say where, or make any judgments about current tax rates.

Obviously it shouldn't be used for any kind of serious discussion about tax rates, other than pointing out the baseline obviousness that taxing too high is counterproductive.
This reminds me, is there any C compilers that allows injecting custom parsing rules? Say, if it is parsing or type checking and hits upon an error, it calls a callback instead of bailing. This would be very useful for adding simple extensions to the language. I tried to make LLVM do this but couldn't figure it out.
It is a proxy to questions that pop up as part of other sessions in my daily use. The LLM chooses its query itself and as long as it is not fine tuned to avoid the “listicles”, or its underlying search engine are not putting importance on more factual responses, I don’t think the answer quality will be as high. It would be weird and redundant if I had to talk to the LLM as if it’s an old school search engine, wouldn’t it?
Many of the "facts" you "know" are really just useful anecdotes, opinions, approximations or mental shortcuts rather than objective facts. These can still be wildly useful, even if they aren't "true" in the pedantic sense...

As a basic example: Newton's laws aren't a fact. They're extremely useful approximations; to get a more-complete picture you need relativistic effects, quantum effects, etc.

As a rule of thumb: Fact check in proportion to the cost of a mistake.
There were no smartphones when I was young and I got bullied a lot. Kids bully wherever they interact. It's not the tech that's the problem.
I agree with your main points but as in where they might go, the Gulf States are a decent option, yeah, their kids won't be playing lacrosse anymore but you lose some and then you win some. I would have said Monaco and Switzerland, too, but I think that those two options are on their last legs and that those "loopholes" will be closed sooner rather than later (on the both EU and US pressure).
Sure it does, you can always rescind your citizenship / green card if you have no intentions of returning to live in the US.
Don’t you see it coming ? Contrary to google search the engine knows you and will put personalized ads on synthesized answers. Even generate a small video ad of a product or service, tailored to you on the spot.
That, is the future. This is the endgame. It’s what made Google rich, why not use the same formula on steroids.
Great statement “be an active participant in your job search”. That says everything about the job seeker!
…or some people just prefer visual interactions to text only formats.

This is very true in my case because I’m dyslexic so I ingest context more easily when heard vs when read.

For other people, it might just be a personal preference. Just like you have the personal preference to read rather than watch.

Arguing that the GP has some major character flaw because of their own personal preference really says more about your own character than it does theirs.
I feel like this calls for harmonizing tax rules within europe and plugging loopholes more than let’s not even dare ask billionaires to pay their fair share.
What layoffs teach us about technical leadership
So he was essentially saying it’s so correct that there’s no point in talking about it?
Wow, so that problem was from the LeetCode website itself?

Was it with different parameters or different phrasing, ... Or everything was the same?

If same but different, I wonder how (un)likely it is that they came up with that problem themselves, independently, without knowing about the LeetCode version. (What would you think?)

(Nice that you found it anyway)
How many stayed?
This jump from "AI assistance" to "millions or billions of destitute people" is unjustified. Yes, AI can assist, but it doesn't replace human presence as it is now, in any field. Instead it creates demand for improvements across the board and creates more work for us.

When we went from horses to cars, we increased the volume of shipments and percentually more people work in transportation now than in 1910.

Another example - programming has been automating itself for 60 years. Each new language, framework or library, each project on Github makes future work more efficient. Yet we have seen an increase, not a decrease, in development jobs, and good salaries.

I would say humans are the critical ingredient AI needs to be effective, at least for now. And in the far future where AI can work without assistance, then it just empowers everyone to not need to work. We can use AI directly for our own benefit, automating self reliance for people. Unlike UBI, you can copy an AI and give it to everyone for free.

In both scenarios: weak AI making room for jobs, or strong AI making work not necessary, it turns out ok. But have more faith in our insatiable greed, we won't run out of work before we run out of desires.
It costs thousands of dollars to renounce US citizenship. There's also an "exit tax", though that doesn't come into play unless you have millions in assets.
It doesn't sound like it's "backfiring", does it? Removing these ultra-rich people from the country will certainly decrease the wealth gap between the rich and the poor, which is probably one of the main goals of the tax.

The unsourced assumption of TFA is the consideration of these ultra-rich people as "wealth creators" instead of "extractive elites" (or, in plainer language "filthy parasites"). The net balance of the policy would need to take that into account, but this is not done on this highly ideological article. It seems to me that, as long as the ultra-rich that moved out of the country cannot carry on with their wealth extraction, it's a win-win for everybody involved.
That seems wrong, as most high tax countries (Denmark, Norway, ...) have full employment and very high standards of living for decades now. Do you have a source for that? Eastern European countries catching up with development don't count, see Piketty.
How do you assure AI alignment without refusals? Inherently impossible isn't it?

If an employee was told to spray paint someone's house or send a violently threatening email, they're going to have reservations about it.. We should expect the same for non-human intelligences too.
Weird article. The tone of the article is as if the wealth tax has been a huge disaster for Norway, but the only concrete problem the they spell out is that the wealth tax will only bring in $594 million instead of the expected $1.46 billion. The article fails to mention that this is still an improvement over the $0 dollars before the wealth tax.

In the bottom of the article it says "The Daily Economy is the news outlet of the American Institute for Economic Research". If you look up "American Institute for Economic Research" on Wikipedia you learn that "It has promoted climate change denial, and was known for the Great Barrington Declaration and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic."