skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The problem is that most cheaters don't just go full aimbot and track people through walls. That is a surefire way to make sure your account gets reported, reviewed, and banned regardless of what anti-cheat is in place.

Serial cheaters cheat just enough to give themselves an edge without making it obvious to the people watching them. By just looking at their stats, it can become very difficult (though not impossible) to differentiate a cheater from a pro player. This difficulty increases the odds of getting a false positive, necessitating a higher detection threshhold to avoid banning innocent players.
I'd like to suggest an alternate method that worked for me. I only applied to jobs that 1) I thought I'd enjoy greatly, and that 2) I felt my skills could benefit the employer more than most other applicants. Generally I didn't get fantastic salary jumps but I chose jobs in good companies that didn't cause me too much stress. This let me be a better team player.

Over time it meant that I could study for my next job at night while still having a good work experience. I am paranoid so I always worked close enough to the job that I could bike there if necessary, and I saved money for a rainy day. I even chose to avoid Silicon Valley because I didn't like the ultracompetitive vibe.

I ended up with a big payout from one job that started on the path to my own long-term business, but all along the work/life balance was excellent.

I'm sure I could have negotiated higher but programmers tend to make good money anyhow. Never bothered me when I made $90K but it could have been $105K or whatever.
More often than not we can resolve the payment issue without any customer involvement. That's the ideal path. In many cases the system will delay sending communications if the chances of a recovery by retry drop below a certain level. It's best to avoid asking customers to do something if it may already be fixed. Your bank still may notify you but that depends on your country and bank.

We don't guess a customer's language. Typically our Merchants have a single default language but since our Merchants are global it's important that the various messages we send can be available in different languages. If they have multiple instances for different geo's we can segment by language.

Our transactional emails have incredible deliverability scores and extremely low spam rates. They come from the merchants domain and are lightweight to ensure they go to the right inbox vs. ending up in promotion. For transactional sms we handle the compliance and each Merchant get's their own dedicated #.

Regarding pricing, each Merchant has different volume, failure rates, and recovery rates. Since we guarantee our ROI we have to tailor our pricing to them. We're working to make it easier so this is helpful feedback.
Life was a bit simpler then. At that point in time the leaders also did not get millions for their wins.
How is that thing testing?
Is it expecting a specific solution or actually running the code?
I tried some solutions and it complained anyways
You can choose not to be ethical, but you should advertise it loudly.

Or at the very least, stop protesting when people call it out.
The same line of thinking leads me to conclude that the world is ruled by the United States.

Can we stop with the nationalistic hyperbole already, and discuss acute issues, instead of vague fingerwaving at the foreign boogieman?
From my perspective, writing out the requirements for an AI to produce the code I want is just as easy as writing it myself. There are some types of boilerplate code that I can see being useful to produce with an LLM, but I don't write them often enough to warrant actually setting up the workflow.

Even with the debugging example, if I just read what I wrote I'll find the bug because I understand the language. For more complex bugs, I'd have to feed the LLM a large fraction of my codebase and at that point we're exceeding the level of understanding these things can have.

I would be pretty happy to see an AI that can do effective code reviews, but until that point I probably won't bother.
Doesn’t address the point. Does everyone get a good faith exception from laws they don’t know or misunderstand, or just the police?
I don't think that is the signal that I think most people are hoping for here.

When I hear that most code is trivial, I think of this as a language design or a framework related issue making things harder than they should be.

Throwing AI or generates at the problem just to claim that they fixed it is just frustrating.
Yet they made BootCamp.
Do you see how foolish you look trying to defend nonsense?

Apple try to avoid being too heavy handed in the lockdown because they know the outrage it would cause from their legacy customers. Boil the frog slowly.

But they most definitely are trying to make the Mac more like an iPhone and they would rather not you install any other OS on it.

The bootloader not being completely locked is more for legacy reasons and multi-macOS support (dev/debug) but if you have any problem with it, you will need (surprise-surprise), another Mac for a DFU restore, just like an iPhone.
> 80% at Reasonote
People who have replaced 25% of their brain with ai.
> that realistically could easily replace any entry-level or junior developer.

This is a massive, unsubstantiated leap.
They also explicitly called it out in their announcement videos that the M4 has the fastest CPU cores on the market.
How is this diff from e2b.dev?
> If you know someone is cheating, you prevent further cheating by banning them.

If you think it's statistically likely that someone might be cheating, but you're not sure, you can matchmake them with other people who might be cheating.
Why do you need that? For manga specifically, generate in greyscale and convert luminance to alpha; then composite; then color.

Or, if you need solid regions that overlap and mask out other regions, then generate objects over a chroma-keyable flat background.
There should be a list of manufacturers who build durable consumer electronics.
Ah, yes, for most of us, getting our computer pwned is just like being murdered.
I moved to gigabyte for epyc builds, they seem to run a bit quicker than super micro on initial launch and product line updates.
Cellebrite Premium 7.69.5 iOS Support Matrix from July 2024.

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/14344-cellebrite-premium-ju...
Show HN: Senti – Offline LLM Voice Chat
Hey everyone, I've made a simple app using llama 3.2 and iOS's TTS and Speech to Text APIs. Would love feedback! I plan on adding function calling soon (I've generated all the code but I wanted to ship something simple before integrating it.)
Just get a Lighting to USB-C adapter
Turbines are indeed very well understood and mature technology, and even where the fuel is almost free and the reactor (a coal burner) is cheap, steam turbines are too expensive to compete with solar electricity in most places now.
It hasn't paid off very much, CS2 still has a rampant cheating problem. VAC has been a joke for years at this point.
> how do you detect someone wall hacking automatically?

You don't tell the client the location of anything they can't see.
Constitutional rights did not win enough, it should be that violating constitutional rights means the accused goes free, period, end of story
It's quite amusing to me because I am old enough to remember when Copilot emerged the HN mainthought was that it was the death sentence for big corps, the scrappy independent hacker was going to run circles around them. But here we see the predictable reality: an organization that is already in an elite league in terms of developer velocity gets more benefit from LLM code assistants than Joe Hacker. These technologies serve to entrench and empower those who are already enormously powerful.
Panic at the SPA
That doesn’t change my point. It didn’t test every dev on all platforms, it tested a subset. That subset may well have different attributes to the ones that didn’t engage. So, it says nothing about the audience for the forums as a whole, just the few thousand that engaged.

Perhaps even, there could be fewer Go programmers here and some just took a stab at it even though they don’t know the language. So it could just select for which forum has the most Go programmers. Hardly rigourous.

So I’d take that with a pinch of salt personally
Wait really? I love Fusion 360. I suppose I use it on Windows though. Is it significantly worse on Mac?
Exactly my point. Saying something is the fastest ever is marketing code (at least to me) for minor improvement over the previous generation.

If you're 30% faster than the previous generation, I'd rather see that because my assumption is it's 5%.
The world is still waiting on a huge battery revolution to happen. It looks like it will actually happen Really Soon Now, and there are multiple technologies vying for first place. I hope someone with industry experience drops in and explains what is going on, because I haven't seen a comment like that here on HN for a couple years now. :-D

But honestly whoever gets 2x the density at the same cost will win, and it may be that incumbent advantages don't end up meaning much. AFAIK China's advantage isn't in much cheaper batteries, it is in cost savings everywhere else in making EVs.

For example, VW released a $60k USD EV minivan with mediocre range, and they thought that was a good idea. That sort of acceptance of mediocrity is why traditional automakers are going to get hammered into the ground, except instead of Japanese automakers teaching the lesson, this time it will be Chinese automakers. (Irony: At one point it was VW who helped teach American automakers the same lesson....)
It’s been quite some time since I’ve used Rubocop but I did fight an uphill battle to get it into place. One of the things I had a difficult time explaining was that rules subtly interact with each other. When one rule makes a change, it might simplify something such that another rule can then also make a change. Once I enabled enough rules, there were some pretty impressive chains that were whittled down to almost nothing… but the same application of those rules elsewhere caused hemming and hawing by the naysayers.

I think the best thing that these tools give, above all else, is a way to settle petty opinions in a team. It’s why there is value in rules that either conflict with each other or are configurable so as to meet the expectations of a given team.
No, I did not. I quoted a part of my own post to make it very clear exactly what I was talking about, but apparently that backfired.
"Nerd sniping"
Can you please clarify how an API which runs in the kernel does not have root access? Because I don't believe that's possible, but perhaps I'm wrong.
This submission is the first I've heard of the concept. Are there OSS implementations available? Could I use this, say, to deduplicate resized or re-jpg-compressed images?
"I would never buy a $200 ticket, therefore there does not exist a taylor swift ticket worth $200"

As you point out, different people have different price elasticities. Is it so hard to believe that some people really are willing to pay $5000 to attend?

You rightly point out that resale market prices are likely higher than the market clearing price compared to if there were a single-price auction for all the tickets, but saying that they're worth $100 is just flat out wrong.
Sure, but your cascade of turbines isn't free.

The capital cost of just the turbines is enough to make it hard to compete with solar and batteries in many situations.
Hopefully rubocop-rails-omakase [1] will pull in stuff like this. I've gone from custom Rubocop rules in various projects to just using rubocop-rails-omakase, which finally feels like a consensus of sorts. I think Standard [2] is harmfully redundant, personally.

[1] https://github.com/rails/rubocop-rails-omakase
[2] https://github.com/standardrb/standard
> 2% is not a lot. If it takes 50 years of accumulation for things to get bad, saving 2% means it'll be bad in 51 years.

Only if you simplify everything beyond all measures. But the climate is a little more complicated than "we can only emit X more tons before things get bad".

As an example, there are feedback loops that accelerate climate change once hit. Over time this amplifies the effect of any reduction we achieve now.

Also, the more time we have to "find a solution" as many people bet on, the more of our current biosphere will survive. Aside from any moral obligations, this is obviously in our best interest as it increases the chances of more humans surviving.

Even if you argue against these points, there are many others - none included in the math you've done.
l o l

Fine, they'll gladly eat shit
The way the site works is explained in the first puzzle, "Hack This Site". TLDR, it builds and runs your code against a test suite. If your solutions weren't accepted, it's because they're wrong.
Tesla gets the same rebate in China.
Not so sure nowadays. Given how often big tech lays off employees and the abundance of recently laid off tech talent, trying to start your own company sounds a lot more appealing than ever.

I consider myself risk-averse and even I am contemplating starting a small business in the event I get laid off.
But as gaming has grown and become more mainstream, the ratio of enthusiasts who are willing to admin to casual players who don't has changed. Server sizes have changed over time with smaller games like 5v5 becoming way more common.
Right, and back round we go: £200 for that is terrible value.

And it's still only 512GB! The M4 version coming in the new year will surely bump this up to something more sensible.
Strongly do NOT recommend what we are doing

- https://github.com/chrisgo/fabric-example

- https://github.com/chrisgo/fabric2-example
One thing I've come to realize is that the larger your social circle, the more prone you are to comparisons and hence lifestyle creep. You can see this where the careers that involve a lot of socializing (sales, entertainment, law, finance etc) are known for having flashy people. And the careers that you can do as a loner (programming, quant, researcher etc) are known for having miserly folk
I can't say Puppet has ever gotten in my way, but I've been using it for a very long time. I will admit it has a steep learning curve.
Origins of Zero: a story of science across civilisations
Heh, but it can't be that, no reason to think llms can count brackets needing a close any more than they can count words.
Talking just about games, this really doesn't work with free games. Even if there is a lengthy 'lockout' period from the real game, many games have rampant and cheap accounts for sale and doing so will make the game experience worse.
they should as a matter of course. but I guess "papers" you entrust to someone else are a gray area. I personally think that it goes against the separation of police state and democracy, but I'm a nobody, so it doesn't matter I suppose.
These complaints seem orthogonal to the question of China using dumping as a tactic to dominate a market. Even if you thought the US auto industry was very healthy and well run, it could still be existentially affected by a huge actor with near infinite money like the CCP dumping
> Isn’t the company going to make more sales in the future

Only if you don't overdo it. When your products break too quickly many customers will stay one-time customers and switch to products from the competition. There's also the reputation damage to consider.

And of course it works best if you have a fairly high market share. If you have a low market share most products on the market are from your competitors, so you can you are better off boosting your reputation with longer-lasting products (compared to other products at the same price point).

Come to think of it, the "break it faster to sell more" strategy works mostly in monopolies, duopolies or with market collusion (like the Phoebus cartel that lowered the lifespan of light bulbs)
From TFA:

> In the past five years, faculty at UMD have collectively published over 1300 papers, been awarded over $160m in AI-related research grants...
How do you think it is able to tell if the game is "running in a secure environment" without having root access itself?
> Having looked at drafts of legislation and position statements of governments, many are looking at legally requiring that any implementers of AI systems that make determinations must implement processes to deal with the situation where the AI makes an incorrect determination

The real legislation we need is liability. Who is liable to suffering caused by LLMs inaccuracies?

I think if liability should be on corporations selling the LLM as a solution.

If a person gets arrested for selling the police a fuzzy LLM solution, and this causes unnecessary grief to the individual, the seller of the LLM service must compensate the individual with 4x the median income of their metropolitan area, for the duration of the harm caused.
If a game is overrun with cheaters, people will not play it. You're basically arguing that whole genres of games should cease to exist.
That's not what this means. One can ask whether the belief is reasonable, that is justifiable by a reasoning process. The argument for applying the GFE in this case is that the probability of false positives from a perceptual hash match is low enough that it's OK to assume it's legit and open the image to verify that it was indeed child porn. They then used that finding to get warrants to search the guy's gmail account and later his home.
You can install FlutterShark, it lists all Flutter apps on your device
Why anti-cheat software utilizes kernel drivers (2020)
The thing is the Kernel does not have that API.

The real solution, and not the hack Riot uses, is for Kernel to provide an API for anticheats, like it does for everything useland.
Which MacOS version? I upgraded to a newer one and it crawled to a halt, it's unusable now. UI is insanely laggy. It's sitting in a drawer gathering dust now
There's some weird[1] laws around privacy in Australia, where government departments are blocked from a bunch of things by law. From my perspective as a citizen, this just results in annoyance such as having to fill out forms over and over to give the government data that they already have.

I heard a good definition from my dad: "Privacy for me is pedestrians walking past my window not seeing me step out of the shower naked, or my neighbours not overhearing our domestic arguments."

Basically, if the nude photos you're taking on your mobile phone can be seen by random people, then you don't have privacy.

Apple encrypts my photos so that the IT guy managing the storage servers can't see them. Samsung is the type of company that includes a screen-capture "feature" in their TVs so that they can profile you for ad-targeting. I guarantee you that they've collected and can see the pictures of naked children in the bathtub from when someone used screen mirroring from their phone to show their relatives pictures of their grandkids. That's not privacy.

Sure, I use Google services, but I don't upload naked kid pictures to anything owned by Alphabet corp, so no problem.

However, I will never buy any Samsung product for any purpose because they laugh and point at customer expectations of privacy.

[1] Actually not that weird. Now that I've worked in government departments, I "get" the need for these regulations. Large organisations are made up of individuals, and both the org and the individual people will abuse their access to data for their own benefit. Many such people will even think they're doing the "right thing" while destroying freedom in the process, like people that keep trying to make voting systems traceable... so that vote buying will become easy again.
> Ebola kills too quickly for hosts to move around and spread it

too quickly for _human_ hosts to spread it, but maybe that's where multi-species hosts comes into play.

perhaps it lingers nonlethal in some related species?

(like rabies in bats, for example)
There have always been hordes of spam and scam websites. Can you point to anything that actually indicates that the ratio is now getting worse?

No, there haven't always been hordes of spam and scam websites. I remember the web of the 90s. When Google first arrived on the scene every site on the results page was a real site, not a spam/scam site.
If I tab complete my function and variable symbols, does my lsp write 80%+ of my lines of code?
SaaS that analyses and monitors your tests (similar tool used daily at Meta)
I've been working at Meta for 4 years. I work in the testing infrastructure space, taking care of hundreds of thousands of tests.

Together with a friend, who also works in the testing area, we are creating a tool that allows companies to monitor their test suite health. This comes from our experience in this world: we both use similar tools in our daily jobs, and we know for a fact that they are incredibly useful to developers.

The issue is: every company has their own "similar" tool, and they only work for their specific use case. But for the average, non "Big 5" company, there isn't much on the market. So we thought: why don't we create it? Let's make it available for all companies on GitHub, and make it work for most languages.

So the journey started! Few months ago we started hacking TestPulse during our free time (which is not much!), so it took us a long time. But we are definitely happy with the result!

The tool is free for the first 14 days, and doesn't require a credit card.

We would love some feedback! What do you think?

Here's the website: https://www.testpulse.io
Agreed. But remember, this isn't the only time the population has been tested. This is just the test (from two years ago, in 2022) that I happen to have a link to.
>I think most programmers who claim that LLMs aren't useful are reacting emotionally.

I don't think that's true. Most programmers I speak to have been keen to try it out and reap some benefits.

The almost universal experience has been that it works for trivial problems, starts injecting mistakes for harder problems and goes completely off the rails for anything really difficult.
We already have laws for this. "Auto-generating" steps outside of "user generated content" and Facebook should get charged with conspiracy.
Interesting that you believe your subjective experience outweighs the claims of all others who report successfully using LLMs for coding. Wouldn't a more charitable interpretation be that it doesn't fit the stuff you're doing?
I don't really get the quiet moments people seem to comment on the most, but I do have some memorable adventuring moments - like the first time I paraglided across the chasm in the upper left of the map, I turned the camera around to see how far I dropped and there was a GIANT DRAGON (Dinraal) right behind me. I'd seen Farosh in the distance without knowing what it was, but that jump scare was the first one I'd seen close up and didn't yet know they don't attack you.
I mean even people that are "bad at catching things" are still getting ridiculously close to catching it - getting hands to the right area probably within well under a second of the right timing - without being taught anything in particular about how a ball moves through the air.
I bet you felt a real rush of pride after writing that.
It's not much different than a judge sentencing someone to multiple life sentences.
They care about making money, but malicious extensions: damage the Google/Chrome brand, often are directly distorting the search experience and it opens them up to long tail liability (think Cambridge Analytica).

The problem is the organization isn't set up to promote people for proactively managing these risks. Similar to why Twitter never got rid of the bots
This doesn't work well in real time games. The client needs to know another player is on the other side of that wall so it can

* Play sounds from their actions
* Actually be able to render them when either player comes around the corner without them obviously materializing out of thin air.