skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
TL:DR
"USDT was used to pump other traded pairs in order to avoid raising the price of BTC directly.

Once BTC was obtained from the pumps of these currencies, it was then sold immediately for USD, which ‘flooded’ the market and depressed the price of BTC."
For large-scale agricultural food production capable of feeding millions of people, the question of double-cropping under regenerative practices is a tricky one. Modern industrial agriculture relies heavily on two crops per year on the same land, which relies on generous fertilizer and water inputs. Regenerative practices would prefer giving up on the second crop in favor of various methods of biomass accumulation, composting, soil generation etc over that time period.

Note one business opportunity for the regenerative sector could be organic healthy soil production. There's a demand for high-quality soil and this could make the second half of the year productive. This could go well with a mushroom production system integrated with composting.
I have the plugin installed in my browser, why does it wait for me to log in the come to life?
>Jews control the media

Bad, terrible, anti-semitic

>Israel controls the media

Good, woke, socially conscious
A technique perhaps: SumSquare/SquareSum (it's the inverse of the probability of picking a marble of a certain colour from a bag) is a nice smooth scalar "generalisation"(consider {0}) of counting. This could be applied here e.g. if the LLM only has 1.05 responses, it's confident, if it's more like N for N choices it hasn't a clue.
Maybe go for the low-hanging fruit first, so to speak. When I was a free range kid back in the late 70’s, long before CA Redemption Value was conceived, all soft drinks were in deposit bottles. Thick, heavy reusable bottles. You’d pay a dime for the bottle and yeah you brought it back. The truck would go back to the warehouse with a load of empties. The retailer sorted them by brand and flavor. The bottling plant washed them and refilled them. Way more ecological than our current “pretend to recycle” regime we have in the U.S.
What do you mean by 'unbalanced'? "Unstable" or "biased"?

The US seems really unstable right now. It is like a ever growing political cacophony. And blaming the "other side" for a mutual problem seems silly for an external observer.

The bad faith tone is making the caricatures real by moving people further from each other and entrenching distinctive extremes as ingroup markers.

E.g. I feel that during the pandemic supporters of the former president believed the caricatures of his policy on the matter, making it a thing.
Step 4 still doesn't require Apple to lie about what they are or are not doing, it just requires Apple not to repeat or update their previous statement which might have been invalidated by government orders in between, at least not in the present tense with respect to their activities after the government orders.

In particular, it does not prevent them from removing any such invalidated statement from their website, although it's possible they'd have to do that removal as part of a broader overhaul of the relevant page to prevent it from being effectively a disclosure by obvious minimal page diff.
They might if that's the only way to see political debates and such.
Certainly blew the mind of the people writing the techdirt article if the opening paragraph is any indication: "Well here’s a surprise for you / This is… flabbergasting." It's almost like they thought they had good reasons to expect something else from TFG's adminstration.

Why were the results different?

DOJ composition running up through 2018 was pretty strongly influenced by a decade of liberal-leaning but cross-partisan staffing, and this was a legal theory that obviously emerged from within staff rather than coming down from the top.

And psychology of liberal or conservative but principled lawyers is likely to be conscientious enough when it comes to their legal theorizing that except where it serves particular organized power plays, you'll see some principled arguments come out, like this one, because obviously the DMCA exists to protect copyright rather than stymie repair.

Also, right-to-repair has an appeal that crosses partisan boundaries very well, especially among voters themselves. Sure, businesses and social influencers who'd sacrifice right-to-repair for pro-capital / power-play positions are probably highly represented and influential in the right-wing party, what with the investment in social philosophies oriented around hierarchies of status. But going against right-to-repair is still unpopular enough and likely to piss off conservative-identifying libertarians that there was bound to be some discomfort, even with the usual Republican enthusiasm for being a pro-capital / pro-business capture party.

And finally, while it's obvious that the 2018 POTUS is only capable seeing the issue in terms of friends/opportunities and enemies/liabilites rather than principled legal or social theories, it's also obvious that right-to-repair is one of the things that benefited from his shall we say limited range/depth of interest when it comes to policy. Inattention can allow any number of things to thrive. At least until someone offers to buy right-to-repair off of him. Elections matter.
You are ignoring my point.

I was a volunteer at a US science museum that received some taxpayer funding back in the mid-aughts when "Scientific Creationism" was still a thing. Our museum had (and still has) an institutional commitment to the scientific consensus on the age of the universe and earth. If we had caught a volunteer providing visitors with creationism they would have been asked to hand in their badge and not work any more shifts, because that was our institutional position and everyone had to respect that.

Trying to throw that away because of Israel-Palestine is much more threatening to the value of truth than it helps it.
Everything with 'Gaza' in the title is always immediately flagged regardless of content and/or relevance unless Dang removes the flag for wider discussion, which has happened several times in the past. The immediacy and totality with which this occurs feels like intentional censorship, but not from the moderators.

As a counter example just a few articles above this one is one titled "Israel launches air strikes on Iran" linking to the BBC that is not flagged and yet of equivalent relevance. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cn4v67j88e0t
Are they against vaccines in general or just the mRNA ones? Because for the covid vaccines, what I saw was almost entirely anti-mRNA.
“The lion’s Chinese origins highlight the deep cultural and economic exchanges between East and West.“

Exchange is a strange word for mostly looting …
> But framing this as though it has been editors going rogue or something is just not what’s happening at all.

Of which I didn't do. Granted, 40 years is a long time. But given that the company has had the policy of not endorsing for over two-thirds of its existence, I believe the "undo" framing is accurate.
I got this in email from dang just now, but I asked him to chime in so he may have something else or additional to say.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
Why solve problems when you can just outlaw the actions causing them?

/s because sadly I feel it is needed here.
Remind me which party signed the DMCA into law after it passed the house unanimously
Well the argument is that the status quo is bad for all but a select few, so moving past it would be beneficial for basically nearly everybody.

Rent seeking limits innovation, needlessly drives up costs, creates barriers where there shouldn't be any, encourages predatory economic behaviors, suppresses competition, and ultimately leads to monopolistic and or oligopolic wealth and power structures.

It's universally bad practice that results in bad outcomes for society and we should move away from enabling and indeed incentivizing that kind of economic behavior.
Or at least forming your own vision of what you want the world to be like based on your own values, and seeing the world move that way as "personal gain."

I think people nowadays choose some generic and pointlessly bland vision of personal success instead of having their own vision based on their own values out of narcissism. The more generic, the more people will agree that you are successful.
It would take way more for WaPo to not be in a position where mentioning it in one phrase with "impartiality" wouldn't sound like an absurdist joke. They can walk this road, but so far there's absolutely no indication they want to, and Bezos twisting their arms can't be taken as such evidence.
Well if an administrator needs to improve the relative outcome for low-performing students, and can't come up with a better way than to lower the upside for everyone as a whole, I wouldn't really call them any kind of an educator.
I thought it was intentional because the people that control McDonalds corporate also have shares in the ice cream machine vendor and use it as an additional vector to squeeze franchisees for their own enrichment?
You need to return your waste to soil, maybe?

Composting the food waste, and use composting toilets to create a "circular economy".

That is apparently how it was done in the old days...
And that you trust this person to clean the machine properly lest many people get food poisoning.
There is support for that reasoning in the article linked.
I disagree. As the other comments have stated, umami and savory are completely different words. I agree that kawaii and cute are synonyms, but I only see it being used in vaguely japanese-related contexts, where it's not necessary but also not in any way a misuse, similar to how "hors d'oeuvre" is used in place of "appetizer".
NYT has it: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/10/25/world/israel-lebanon...
Neutrality is problematic because in practice it serves the powerful, like every instance of bureaucracy and scientism we can point to through civilized history. Instead you are appealing to some politics-free context-free notion of neutrality which might as well be a made up word then. Humans and institutions are not truth objects, so your incorrect argument is in conflating this with a discussion of access to truth. Universities are human processes, not mathematical theorems for which good and bad are irrelevant, which is a different issue than neutral.
Let's pick one. Milosovic. Would you like to take a stab at defending him or shall I speak for the prosecution first?
It never made it into science class, but only because institutions had (and have) the power to set rules and not be neutral on important issues of the day. It was our choice at the museum that received tax payer funding to not be neutral that kept creationism out. That's picking a side. And that is absolutely essential is my point, because the truth is, unfortunately, not neutral, and we all need to do our best to find that truth. Just saying "be neutral" is abdication of responsibility.
"Anybody can share a sucess story of using a car to go places I couldn't have gone on foot"?

CT is a language and a tool, meaning anything you can say in the language of CT you can say in other languages.

Like cars, if you learn how to drive it (and this one has a very steep learning curve), it gets you places faster, but you there's in principle nothing stopping you from going there walking, i.e. without specifically referring to any CT concepts.
i like this style of article with extensive citing of original sources.

previously on: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41791426

its really interesting to contrast this "outsider" definition of open ai with people with real money at stake https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41046773
I was supplementing with selenium for various reasons, and it seemed clear that it's one of the minerals that used to be supplied via our diet, but is quite deficient now, due to exhaustion in the soil.

Selenium, along with taurine, is one of the supplements which genuinely drove my physicians vehemently crazy, so I doubled up, and ensured that they were the focal point of my daily regimen.
> Even as someone who does think Flakes are better than the prior solutions, I'm increasingly of the opinion that Flakes would be better moved to a layer outside the core Nix project - advancing them within core Nix at this stage seems pretty impossible with many within the project opposed to their existence. I think if Flakes were an alternative project at the same level as something like Niv, a lot of the holy warring would get out of the way.

I posted some information and metrics about that on Discourse:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/announcing-determinate-nix/547...
Can't the tunneling software detect when the upper TCP is retransmitting segments and drop them?

That would give the lower TCP enough time to transmit the original segment.
From Civil Engineering to Computer Science: My 20-Year Journey to Tech Expertise
1. Immediacy trumps quality.

The current headline on the
Washington post is talking about Israeli strikes in Iran.

Is that the most immediate event pertaining to Israel? Probably. Is that the most important recent event pertaining to Israel? Well, that depends, doesn’t it?
I imagine that Open AI (the company) must really not like this.
It seems like the newspaper editorial section really ought to endorse somebody to make their biases clear, if nothing else. What are we to believe, that a bunch of people whose job it is to write opinion pieces don’t have an opinion about the election in their own country? Haha, yeah, sureeee…
>There's no reason we should be selling a single bag of Doritos across the country, let alone for $2.

Most of that is markup. The raw materials are on the order of cents.
I don't want to read a newspaper where the owner is suppressing -- well, anything -- because of concerns for how it might affect his fortune. I want the owner walled off.
The only way in which this could be possible, if not via VPNs, is via everyone have direct satellite internet, which is a bit difficult without good line of sight. It would also require an independent means of payment like layer II of bitcoin.

The better answer would be one where the ISPs don't have any ability to block websites. Web3 technologies could make it possible.
The idea that editorial team has some kind of expertise, unavailable to general population, that allows them ecxlusive ability to properly understand current events, seems to have no factual support at all. They are professionals in giving their opinions, it doesn't make their opinions be better that anybody else's. Experience suggests they are usually worse.
Well said. There's are several sayings, such as "neutrality is the both-sideism fallacy", which is one of the most obvious critical thinking examples that humanities students are taught early on, but it is not so easy to convey this to people without exposure to these ideas.
Race gaps are a societal atrocity and a national embarrassment. It is the enduring humiliation of a society that yearns to displace itself from its history.

Mandating equality by removing opportunity only obscures the metrics. This is a hack to avoid accountability--if there's no data showing inequality then surely there is no inequality.
the feature to see as many Ukrainians dead as possible?
Yeah, but the point is that MacDonalds obviously doesn’t want to sell icecream.

Maybe it’s low margin.

Maybe cleaning is expensive.

Maybe it helps having the promise of cheap ice cream but “sorry not right now” leading customers to buy other (more expensive) items.

It’s not an incompetent organisation.

If they wanted the machines to work, they would work.

They don’t.

So… if anything changes out of this, it will be to keep the status quo; people coming in and not buying cheap ice creams.
An irrelevant question. How did you index the related hackernews threads?
Microsoft has a market cap exceeding $3 Trillion. Most of the people would think the company is doing fine.
Most modern command/control systems are what is called 'frequency agile' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_agility#:~:text=Freq....
and so a C&C system operates cross a wide band, and each system has a series of one time tables that says 'next hop' and the transmit and receive communications - or it random hops, with each one telling 'next'. Small drones can not carry the computational power to do this. Often the higher power base does all this and tells the drone/missile 'next'
Frequency agility, coupled with directional agility(phased array) make it harder.
Drone systems usually depend on higher power frequency hopping to saturate a range of frequencies and hope for the duration of the desensitising effect where the lower power and computational power of the drone to insert ambiguity into the bidirectional C&C signals and hope the drone settles down or goes home.
It is complex, but as the drone get further away from the C&C it becomes easier to disrupt.
A drone can fly in a cruise mode and when it detected interference - often with sync bars on the screen, instruct the drone to switch into a less jammable frequency (but uses more battery power- the scarce resource in a drone) as it gets closer to the target where more jamming power is expended. I expect low power ARM systems will help in this.
RH is doing a lot of good things like unifying the NetworkManager configuration for plugins. But some things give me pause, such as - and it's been a while so I don't quite remember - copying ssh key selection settings to a security policy file elsewhere such that those settings in the regular config would be ignored. These are ssh-specific settings that did not integrate into a global "policy", and which were placed in a nonstandard location - not ssh.d, which now that I think about it is probably another RH invention.
Ah, cringe. In my defense, https://www.reddit.com/r/LinguisticMaps/comments/pyrli2/whic...
>Good, trustworthy governance.

This example shows that you can't just shut off free speech to a few rogue nations, because states 'incompatible with liberal democracy' include the majority of the world's population. As we see, they hold enough influence to assert their censorship on all of us, regardless of where we are.

What hypothetical 'trustworthy governance' would be less susceptible to India's influence than WMF is in this case?
That is very impressive and beautiful to see.
You are right but best to do that on day 1, which was probably in the 1970s or whenever a database of company names first existed. In the case of HTML script exploits maybe the 1990s.

So you have a transitioning issue. You suddenly allow this company name sending a script to a domain they control then it is too dangerous.

Test data like you mentioned is a great idea to increase resiliance. However I don't think that rises the overall ecosystem of consumers of this data to the right level to release actual exploits into the dataset.

Downvoters are probably thinking purely. They are thinking "everyone in the world should make their systems 100% secure against common exploits and let a company name be an arbitrary string".

The problem is that is not realistic.

It works at a corporate level but not across all actors who interact with this dataset and the global internet. You can "should" at them all you like but no one has control over this.

The government can choose: more exploits in the wild or fewer. Allowing script URLs they dont control in company names is the former.
> in reality it's more like the Occupying Army.

It's not more like, it's outright the occupying army. Russians are the illegal invaders, full stop.

Also, don't bother engaging with our resident Russian-supporting troll. Just flag and move on, not worth your energy.

Also, să ai o zi faină!
Technique seems to me specific and technical. Method is more general and abstract. Hence my brain wiring and decoder seems ok with it. Wonder as the other post said how you would have written it, even assume these are the same word as you cannot repeat the word without sounding odd ?
Illusion. Mirage.
Well, to start, their TV shows are pretty terrible.
Nix Team member suggests dropping flakes; data suggest otherwise
Is this sarcasm? Globo has never missed an opportunity to be virulently anti-PT.
I have an interesting 3-letter.net

I set up a catch-all for personal use and wasn't expecting to get flooded with emails.

I was getting business emails, people trying to send money by Zelle, etc.

I was kind of hoping to get something good that I could take action on in the market, so I left it on for a little bit, but then I felt bad that people's emails were not getting answered (at least bouncing), so I turned off the catch-all. Oh well.
Hi, I’ve read the DBSP paper and it’s a really well-thought out framework; all the magic seemed so simple with the way the paper laid things out. However, the paper dealt with abelian Z-sets only, and mentioned that in your implementation, you also handle the non-abelian aspect of ordering. I was wondering if you guys have published about how did you that?
A single man issued an edict and ended decades of precedent/history. All for the sake of the mighty dollar and ensuring his multibillion dollar fortune doesn’t take a tumble by a 5-10B in the _possibility_ the wrong candidate gets elected.

Everything is awful about this. What would it take WaPo away from this horrible person?
There is no such thing as common sense application of the law because, seemingly, there is no such thing as common sense.

The world is not a simple and easily defined place. We see this in computer code all the time. It can start out simple, but humans both want and need things added. These added things can conflict. People can exploit things in complex manners that no one previously thought of which then needs further updates. Complexity never goes down it increases over time.
>because the people that control McDonalds corporate also have shares in the ice cream machine vendor and use it as an additional vector to squeeze franchisees for their own enrichment?

Source?
Some context that is essentially personal opinion, take it for what it's worth:

It's not that ANI is an absolutely non-partisan and an objective outlet. They do lean pro-government, but the yardstick being applied here is not consistent at all. No Indian news outlet is great by that yardstick, but one is being called an absolute sham, and those who consistently take anti-establishment stances, often without merit, barely get a footnote.

Now you could argue that Wikipedia is volunteer-driven, and you could submit an edit, but it is hard. During the farmers' protests ~3 years ago, articles were worded in a manner that led one to believe that deaths by natural causes among the protestors were somehow caused by the protests. I just checked the article as I was writing this response, and there is still a detailed section titled "fatalities" that mostly documents deaths from natural causes. I tried sending in edits for some of this back in the day but faced an uphill battle against other contributors and gave up because I had a day job to get to.

None of this justifies a page being blocked, especially outside Indian jurisdiction, but it would be unwise to ignore the broader context about the website being an ideological battleground and not being able to pull off the right balance.
I don't get why there is this assumption that Bezos would not just be supporting him.

> have bent the knee

This sounds a bit like "thedonald" nomenclature?
It was a joke, not an invitation.