skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not a Japanese person, but the way this has been explained to me feels slightly broader than the concept of vocation.

The explanation was more along the lines of, "what gives your life meaning, joy, and purpose, and makes you motivated to get out of bed every morning and venture out into the world to do your thing and contribute to the world around you".

So your vocation might be teaching more generally but your ikigai might be teaching that one class of delinquent kids nobody likes, and striving to make them succeed, for example? But maybe I'm wrong.

Also, the venn diagram at the bottom is lacking the most important information, what the 'curved triangles' represent. There's a better one here: https://i0.wp.com/marieskelton.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/0...
(ironically taken from another article like the one linked here. https://marieskelton.com/finding-your-passion-and-purpose/ )
> Have governments become more authoritarian?

Judging by the various misinformation legislation they're rushing to adopt, yes. The free internet said too many things that powerful people didn't like.

An Australian example:
https://x.com/SenatorRennick/status/1834455727764869593#m
1) He already has experience with the Trump admin trying to deny AWS from government contracts on the basis of Trump's personal frustration with the Washington Post.

2) It's notable that his other significant enterprise is Blue Origin, whose competitor is Elon Musk, who has by now deeply and publicly ingratiated himself with the Trump campaign.

Maybe Lina Khan is part of the story, but it's silly to act like there aren't more straightforwards reasons.
Did ipsec over udp for client vpn, to datacenter and even to Azure from AWS. No issues whatsoever, never did more than a Gbit over 1 tunnel though.
Well, there's an enormous amount more money to be made in the United States with political advertising, so you're going to get a great deal more pushback from advertisers on any such attempt /s
We HOPE we never see a return to rural farming life…
Probably the opposite. He doesn’t think it’s significant, but the risk of petty retaliation IS significant.
Time to sit back and wait for the Streisand effect [0] to kick in...
When will they learn that trying to hide things from the Internet is never that simple (as evidenced by the already-posted archive links)?

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
> Is is all compound types (structs, classes)?

Well, plain-old-data structs are not something I would call bespoke types. Classes for which you write code, I suppose.

> All non-primitive types are essentially

If you only use plain structs, then maybe.
That’s fair enough, but you should consider that a news source might be biased toward facts and empathy and still might endorse a candidate.
This is a story that is going to lead to political passions. Don't want such stories? Just kill them. What kind of useful conversation do you think it will raise that will not ignite passions?

Sometimes your guidelines are stupid.
Devil's advocate: you can be more than one thing at once. And newspapers never promised to only be for journalism.
It correlates with demand. These things go down quickly during peak demand because they can't maintain cold temps. You'll often see this during summer heatwaves as people flock to drive-thrus to grab some ice cream!
A newspaper isn't a "regular" business. There's a reason why the press has explicit protection in the Constitution. It is a special entity, and now Bezos has killed a 40 year tradition because he's afraid Trump will come after him if he wins. So this is likely a Hail Mary to try and save himself from potential imprisonment and fines from a Trump administration. I would have preferred they just come and support Trump if that's what Bezos wanted instead of waffling.
That's exactly right - RH is windozifying Linux.
They shouldn’t comply on principle. But this trend of global blocks is picking up. See Australia versus X.
Welcome under Capitalism, where parasites - the shareholders - are free to rule over the real wealth creators - the workers.
What was said was: "In the 90s newspapers made an effort to not endorse candidates to appear unbiased".

This was countered with "endorsements have been a thing since long before the 90s".

Previous poster didn't say anything about what's "good" or "bad". They pointed out a claim was incorrect.
The NYT isn't a propaganda tool of the incumbent government; they are the mouthpiece of the establishment, which is different.
Slight correction - 3 Generals off the top of my head (Kelly, Mattis, and Milley)
The URL doesn't work for me. Same for a previous submission https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41841935

https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pyworkers.dev
https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/vieews.com
It influences no one, but it sends a pretty loud message to the Democratic party that (now two, LATimes did same thing) normally reliable media orgs have lost confidence in the democrat party’s ability to bring forth a competitive candidate against Donald Trump.
Do you think that there's a link between an extreme proliferation of misinformation and people wanting to control it?
Why is that the behavior? It seems obviously wrong to me.
All of Wikipedia would likely be banned which, I assume, they want to avoid.
Show HN: ReelFarm – 1-click automate entire YouTube channels
Yes, that is censorship. It used to be unpopular around here. Maybe you’re fine with it when an anointed shareholder does it, but that’s what it is.

It’s a big deal that a major historic news organization’s editorial board is overruled by the owner, whether or not you agree with the decision.
There's been so much focus on education as the new fault line in American politics. And though it is huge, and the less educated increasingly do support ultra-conservative policies, I think the even bigger fault line is across genders. And tech workers, though usually well educated, skew dramatically male and those degrees and salaries don't make them immune to the growing culture of male grievance and victimhood.
Newspapers publish opinions for the same reason that they publish comic strips: people want to read them. Readers seek them out. Newspapers are a business and have to give their customers what they want.

The problematic aspect here is that the current business owner, Jeff Bezos, has a conflict of interest. Bezos is making a bad business decision for The Washington Post, sacrificing it and losing readers for the sake of his other business interests, i.e., government contracts. It's unlikely that an independent owner with no conflict of interest would make the same decision.
Where does it end?

What if the company name includes “PRINT” or “GOTO” ?
Given general hypocrisy, I expect an R endorsement come 2028. When the "swamp" is cleared and Bezo's Ai can write his opinions ghosting as a "journalist" with a respected brand.
It doesn't. After a few years, the scant resources (phosphates, magnesium, manganese) run out again.

Most small-scale regenerative ag farms are bringing in a lot of outside material to add those minerals back in.

My farmland hasn't been farmed for 50 years. If I clear an area and put a veggie bed in, I get 1 year of great yield, 1 year of "okay" yield, and then it becomes impossible to grow anything due to nutrient deficiencies.
I don’t think this would be such an issue. There’s about 500x as much oxygen in the air as carbon dioxide.

Increasing the amount of carbon dioxide by 140ppm is a 50% increase in carbon dioxide levels since pre industrial times.

Reducing the about of oxygen, currently at 209,000ppm, by 140ppm seems like it would have a negligible effect.

The far greater likely issue with natural hydrogen is that we simply don’t find any deposits of it that are both significant and economically extractable. And in the mean time we use it as an excuse to not do anything about carbon emissions.
If they have nothing to say, maybe nobody needs to hear it.
"What is truth?" asked the powerful Roman governor of Judea, of a man accused of blasphemy two millennia ago, and we still don't know. What is "neutrality" for a university? Is creationism "neutral"? It was a huge political deal in the US for decades (though it seems to have died down recently), but in the 1980's, 1990's, and into the 2000's there were plenty of people who wanted creationism taught in science classes, or at least to "teach the controversy." Was picking sides on that topic in science class "neutral"?

Is the superiority of phonics based literacy approaches "neutral" or criticism of teachers unions? If a economics professors research indicates that, say, supply-side economics doesn't work under current circumstances, is it "neutral" for her to tell her class that? If a law professor thinks that judges only make ad hoc arguments to achieve whatever ends they desire, can they teach their class legal nihilism?

"Neutral" is the sort of thing that someone who has never actually tried to teach or inform can think is reasonable, until you actually try and do it and realize that there are people out there who strongly want to contest whether the earth is round, and that either you throw up your hands and accept epistemological nihilism or you accept that you have to pick sides, and try and do a good job of picking the right sides.
This is something I've been curious about for a while. GDPR, IIUC, makes an EU law apply to things that happen inside the US (for example, EU person flies to the US and uses Facebook on US-housed servers with data stored in the US, GDPR apparently considers that in-scope for the law).
Synchronizing is not too difficult. You can use syncthing or any cloud-based storage solutions you are already using. You can also back stuff up. Given it has a recycle bin I wouldn't think accidentally deleting stuff is any more likely than a cloud solution. It's probably harder to back up a cloud solution as you don't have direct access to the file.
It's common practice across the anglosphere (US, Canada, UK, Australia, NZ). I'm not sure about elsewhere.
I can't tell if he's joking or not. I mean, it is a perfect plan for working at a dysfunctional company, but why would you want to?

That said, it's actually very good advice if you want a promotion. Your manager needs hard data to take upstairs.
mate, you're assuming that the democrats are well enough organised to actually think like that, let alone execute a plan so complicated.

They clearly are a party divided by old timers, radicals and the rest. Biden has a retinue of close advisers who loose power when he looses office (either by mental ability or loosing) They have the influence to damage anyone taking a swipe at the "king". Obvious disloyalty is toxic in politics. (even more so in trump circles. even though hes not very loyal to you)

Trying to pry a leader out of their seat, when there are no clear charismatic upstarts is fucking hard, even more so when your party is in paralysis because they are loosing in the polls.

THe democrats bungled it. and you have Harris.

Youre citing sources saying that the democrats will plan x,y & z, and they are keeping it a secret.

They can't keep a secret. Look how much warning we had about Biden being yeeted. _months_ of low lying noises and grumbles.

Where as you look at trump and he says: "I'm going to deport milions"

and

> “We have some very bad people. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics. And I think they’re the big — and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military, because they can’t let that happen.”

There isn't really an equivalent from the democrats, because they are disorganised and frankly useless.

Trump has a chance to do this because he's surrounded by pricks who'll let that happen.
> How can I stay politically invested in a democratic society that vociferously supports a burgeoning dictator?

The problem is the lie that either of these candidates is anything like a dictator, not people supporting them. Neither Trump nor Harris is my pick for president, but whoever wins it will still be business as usual in America for four years. The only thing which actually threatens is is fearmongering tearing apart our bonds as countrymen and undermining belief in our system of government.
There is no neutrality in the face of evil.

Journalism and journalists are not supposed to be neutral, but impartial.

Ethics are pretty universal.
Isn't it much better from a left-wing perspective to have Trump win the primary and lose the general until he dies? Because if he loses this time, that seems likely to happen.
It's not a registered domain.. for $11 it can be yours
Ah, that explains it, thank you.
Any sign of strength than can be bought (i.e. fake strength), probably already has been bought by Musk and/or others trying for influence the election. They say the sudden betting market swing for Trump from a few weeks ago comes from overseas money (4 people, maybe all the same), but I'd not be surprised if Musk were behind it given that he's out there trying to buy people's votes.
We didn't give freedom of the press to protect businesses from government scrutiny. We did it to keep free information flowing.

There's definitely some very hard and frank questions we need to ask if free information decides to focus on profits over communication.
The intent was to remove people of any nationality who work for Russian companies from being kernel maintainers. The way they rolled that out didn't match their intent, though.
I changed my name in Coke Auction[0] ~2000 to a script like this that stopped anyone else bidding on any auction I bid on. I won a bunch of stuff, then my account was erased and I got a letter from the MD of Coke UK telling me I was a very naughty boy. Karma won, because I'd bought thousands of cans of Coke and snipped off all the ringpulls for credits, and now I had no credits and thousands of cans nobody wanted.

[0] The whole site seems to have been erased from reality, very little even shows it ever existed: https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/coke-auction-beats-pe...
Yeah this was weird. You usually expect this from a newspaper where the editor chooses an inaccurate headline, but this is iFixit? The actual text of the article points out that just about every McDonalds franchise will be unaffected and have equally broken ice cream machines, which is why it's so weird that they contradict that in the headline.
I guess we need to think about what it means to be “neutral”. If half of Americans believe the earth is flat, is the neutral stance to say it’s unclear? Or is it to figure out what the truth is? In my mind there’s a difference between journalists and pollsters.

Of course with endorsements you can technically bring up the is/aught dichotomy. The facts may be what they are but that doesn’t necessitate any particular action. While this is technically true, I never see anyone complaining about the ethics of testing products and endorsing good ones. Wirecutter is basically doing the same thing with headphones and running shoes. Yet I only ever see pushback on political endorsements.

In short, umpires are neutral and fair but the fact that some teams win a lot more than others doesn’t mean they’re not doing their job.
It clearly ends "In the opinion of the secretary of the state".

The beautiful thing about legislation (unlike computer code) is you can shell out to a human judgement call.
There's only so much a single person can actually do.

Is it genuinely feasible to believe that some human's impact in a company can be 1000X that of another?
you see how incedisive so many people are and sadly realize that yes: an endorsement from a big newspaper can mean a lot.
I feel like (by which I mean, in my tests for personal projects) performance peaked with 3.11, and has been going downhill since.

For example, 3.12 changed the byte code list comprehensions use, citing faster performance. In my tests, this is only true with small lists, and as soon as you get to a large number of items (~10K), it falls off a cliff. While large lists are probably not the norm, to have that completely ignored is maddening.

The 3.13 REPL is nice, I’ll give them that.
Let's create bots to listen it.
Maybe Apple actually had it right with the first iPhone. No apps, just e-mail, texting and a good web browser.
Well, he does have a reasonable chance to be elected to presidency, so there's that.

Morality and general spinelessness aside, it's clearly the sensible thing to do. You might anger a few sensible people but that will pass. Trump is not exactly known to be forgiving. Remember when he refused emergency aid to states that weren't supportive enough of him? That's the sort of decrepit small-minded snowflake we're talking about.
This has recently been challenged in courts and rejected: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/08/federal-appeals-court-...

> Integral to the Court’s decision was the conclusion that Section 1201’s ban on circumvention of access restrictions is a regulation of “conduct” rather than “speech.”
I've never heard your version ending with "just use a third party service".

Usually that phrase refers to libraries made by experts, not services that might be setup just as amateurish as one's own, with the drawback of monoculture on top.
100%. Or even January 2024. Shutting down the operation last minute is simply suspect in so many areas.
The + character: What William Gibson termed "the hipster's ampersand."
Would you say that blind-deaf-paralyzed people do not have world models either, since they can only experience the world through words?
No.

Media has always been salacious nonsense — at least, judging from the 1880s English newspapers I’ve read as part of a research writing class: they’re full of complete lies about Jack the Ripper, for instance.

Most of the discussion from government is using that perennial fact to justify suppressing true information — eg, suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story or people’s personal experiences with the COVID vaccine. Even though that collapsed both trust in media and trust in medical institutions.
I mean not really

Its just a hedge.

If HArris wins, she's unlikley to actually take petty revenge. If trump wins, he has past form.
And how well they use facts to back their bias(es)
Endorsements are published by the editorial section which is specifically separated from the rest of the newspaper so to not undermine the neutrality of the journalism in the other sections.

Opinion and analysis has always been part of news publications, and plays an accepted role in adding layers of interpretation onto the raw "facts" that is crucial in making those facts interpretable by readers who aren't expert in the subject matter.
This is a completely wrong and perhaps deliberately misleading impression of journalism and journalists. Healthy journalism absolutely provides critical analysis.
Do some puzzles require trial and error solving? I’m in a 7x7 that doesn’t seem to have a way to 100% rule in/out squares early on.

Good chance I’m not seeing one, but I’ve been staring at it for a while, and not seeing it.

If someone told me “yeah, all puzzles have exactly one solution, but may require trial and error”, I would feel (only slightly) less dumb.

The puzzle is:

Ships: 4, 3, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1

Top numbers: 4 2 1 2 1 1 3

Left numbers: 2 1 4 2 0 4 1

Freebie ship square: col 4, row 3

Edit: one thing I just realized is that I could have eliminated the diagonal squares from the freebie.

Side suggestion: I can’t go back to my puzzle — would be nice if the puzzle was hashed into the URL somehow.

Edit 2: Also just realized that the freebie square(s) may point in a direction, so the adjacent square is guaranteed a ship. Don’t know why I didn’t figure that out sooner. I assumed it wouldn’t hint at that or else it would’ve just filled it in for you.
A billionaire personally intervening in the endorsement of a major newspaper on the basis of profit motive seems like the sort of thing that would contribute to anti-trust peril.
What is project 2025?
If Bezos goes back on his word and lets or orders the Washington Post endorse a candidate in future elections? Yeah, weapons free to torch his ass.
After more than 60 years the Reductio ad Hitlerium is finally losing its power, heartening to see.
This is similar to what Aider does in "architect" mode [1].

--

1: https://aider.chat/docs/usage/modes.html#architect-mode-and-...
CEO actions can easily lead to company bankruptcy. Not so much actions of some SWE
> "to be unbiased in journalism"

By no means. Word choice on its own __is__ a bias. Even if you reported straight facts, the word choice used presents a bias or not. Is it a military action or a terrorist attack? Is it a protest? An occupation? Are they Freedom Fighters?

Choosing __to__ or __not to__ use an organization's given name or a description of them, is having a bias.

Choosing to report on something at all is a presentation of bias.

There is bias in everything and to imagine there isn't is to be even more susceptible to it.
It is ironic because Washington Post is the most left leaning of all major news paper. Their endorsement is really a no-op, because there is really only one candidate they could ever consider.
Before you buy a domain name, first check to see if it's haunted
As someone who has cleaned a soft serve machine, its not really long or tedious.
Is the syllable still the Mark if you pronounce it with a soft G instead of a hard G?
Opinion sections on websites and on TV/video should be segregated from the rest of the organization in some way. On paper having it as a section was fine because it used to be marked relatively clearly and there were serious logistical issues.

However, with video and websites, it is very easy to mix editor opinion with news. People tuning into a news channel mid-report don't necessarily know they're listening to just an opinion, and same goes for people reading the headline from an embed or URL without clicking through to the page.

Another thing I often notice is that opinion pieces get to play more loose with the facts. They can say completely unsubstantiated things or get actual facts wrong, but still say something as if it had the credibility of the organization. Yet if the backlash gets too strong they get to deflect by arguing that it was just an opinion and not meant to reflect on the organization.

The current state of opinion pieces is like running a blog about my research and getting important things wrong there, then expecting people to assume that my actual research publications are accurate.
Ohh, that’d be awesome! Thank you! I’m krogfot at proton.me
Can you have a company name that is only curly left apostrophe, curly right apostrophe, and straight apostrophe? Asking for a friend.
Given this context, I don't give much BOTD for the "external party".
Under capitalism any worker can go start their own business.
>That's what bribes will get you

So when the government does nothing, it's "the major parties at the time pushed the lie that government can do no good for society" but when it does something it's "That's what bribes will get you"?
TDH seems like it would tend to coincidentally reproduce the tendency of animals (humans included) to create paths by having lots of people travel through somewhere. The cause and effect is flipped, but the player doesn’t have to know that, right?
No making fun intended. I thought my tone was entirely factual.

You might also be interested to learn that at around the same time Western Digital announced a plan to switch all their (WD and SanDisk) disk controllers to RISC-V, at (then) a billion plus cores a year

https://www.anandtech.com/show/12133/western-digital-to-deve...

And in December 2019 Samsung announced that there are two SiFive RISC-V cores in each Galaxy S20 (and presumably the matching Galaxy Tab)

https://www.anandtech.com/show/15228/samsung-to-use-riscv-co...

Just a few heavyweights using -- and announcing! -- using RISC-V in the times before most people had heard of it.