skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because my voice is deep and I'm soft spoken, I've always been told people could feel my voice before they heard it, and a lot of noise cancellation models have a hard time distinguishing me from environmental sound and suppress my speech.

It's weirdly isolating not being able to communicate in certain meeting software or on some phones because a computer thinks I'm the machine.
The idea of dogs being the main source of domestic violence in the U.S is hilarious. Is there some epidemic of drunken dogs coming home to beat their owners that I haven't heard of yet?

But seriously, you seem to have a bizarrely pathological hatred of dogs, enough of it to just throw out completely random accusations against them with nothing at all to back your weird bullshit. Why? Who knows, but if you're going to do it why not add a source or two?
Lithium isn't a fuel
"Completely unknown" is the main point here. I don't think categorical statements make sense when they are based only on what we know.

The Wright brothers seem like a poor example. But consider the slowing down of time near mass, the tunnel effect, superconductors, super fluids... There are many examples of things that make absolutely no sense in the context of older theories. I don't think our theories are the final ones just because we can explain most things that we have observed so far.

Sure I find it hard to imagine how individuals could travel to another galaxy, absent something like usable wormholes. But some kind of giant world moving through space over the span of millions of years, why not?

The point of these discussions is not to find the correct answer about what will happen. It's just fun to dream and imagine the possibilities, precisely because nobody has the answer (and certainly not those who pretend to know what's possible).
What is HAMC in this context?
There are lots of Rust web-related libraries that are modular.
It's a pretty big operation to purge all of that legacy gear, so the government made a multi-billion dollar fund to support the removal over time, and I believe gave them until 2025 to finish the purge. And even that isn't exhaustive: They can still operate it after the deadline, they'll just be restricted from various government subsidies and programs.

So the government didn't flip a switch and tell them to make it disappear. They expected it to be a staggered, eventual process.
Isn't the problem the lack of advanced features for executing the current ISA with speed? I thought RISC-V chips seen in the wild do not pipelining, out-of-order, register renaming, multiple int/float/logic units, speculation, branch predictors, multi-tier caching, etc. The lack of speed isn't really related to a few missing vector instructions.
After much sleuthing, I finally found the original comment. It has a link to images of the built out project which is nice and in the replies the OP posts links to the GitHub gist. If any interest in my react version I can make that public too, just know it was quick and dirty but does work.

https://news.ycombinator.com/context?id=37036108
The one that gets me is the issue they found while testing gpt-4o where it stopped mid sentence, shouted "No!", then cloned the users voice and began speaking as them.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/08/chatg...
Why do you feel the need to simp for this man? Is it a parasocial relationship? I imagine he wouldn't be making lists about your good points if the shoe was on the other foot
From those numbers, I think you did very well already in optimization. In a lot of places rent is more than 1000 euros, so those costs are quite low in comparison. Everything is relative. My late mother used to say 'one can spend a lot, with very little one can get by'.
Einstein and Gödel's Thoughtful Walks in Princeton
Yeah, I feel like articles like this shouldn't be posted, but instead the link to the source.
(Shrug) AI is now better at CAPTCHAs than I am, so bring it on I guess.
https://archive.ph/6doQh
>> because it's state-run, the "value" is extremely hard to quantify

The value of a privately-operated park would be no less difficult to quantify. National forests are not theme parks. They have a value even if nobody ever sets foot inside.
You know, i enjoy cycling as much as many others. But in the end, it is an illusion. Motorized biking is already making the lanes dangerous. And i have seen bike rage more often than i did in cars. So, in the end, we will just go again the same road, with how we ended up with cars: we want to go from A to B, sometimes as a leisure activity, sometimes regular, sometimes in a rush. Thats why we used cars or motor bikes (And to avoid mass transport in metal boxes, heh).

Personal anecdote: I wanted to paint my apartment. It was so hard to get someone to do it. Because no one wanted to come to the city. The effort to find parking nearby was not worth the hassle to just paint my little apartment.

We will see where this goes to and how we will change or rebuild the cities. But surely not for bikes only.
Spies don't "sound alarms". They prevent problems, by methods including murder. No alarms are sounded before, during, or after.
> On 5 September, ANI asked the court to hold WMF in contempt when the identifying details [of the contributors] were not released. Chawla complied and warned WMF that the court could order the government of India to block Wikipedia in the country, saying "We will not take it any more. If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will close your business transactions here."

I hate this accelerationist tendency in me because the harm to real people is so high, but do it you cowards. Nations keep trying to assert themselves, declare themselves bigger in some kind of refutation of the Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace, but it's broadly unenforceable & self injuring in extreme to cut yourself off from the world.

Whether to shield contributors is a complex question, one I do not envy agencies for.

It'll be interesting to see if this litigation & strong willed court helps or hurts the perception that ANI is in the pockets of the ruling party. This feels a little too eccentric to go big-time world wide, but I wonder if people in India had strong opinions about this before and how that will change now. What's the Streisand effect here?
What? Somehow people in the west getting arrested for protesting against genocide, is acceptable/redeemable just because another country is presumably worse??? Do you actually care about freedom/human rights at all or are you just abusing those concepts to feel superior relative to other countries and to play petty tribal us-vs-them politics?
I don't know, it's just my personal experience. I used the "OSS Code" fork for a few years on Archlinux but Python intellisense kept breaking when I needed it the most, often with one cryptic error or another. Sometimes I could fix it by switching to VSCodium, installing/uninstalling the `code-features` package, or some random config tweak, but at some point I just got tired of fighting the editor instead of coding.
Implementing the Tower Service Trait
Hard disagree, even as a pedestrian it doesn't make sense to have right-of-way over cars. They de facto have it anyway since I'm not suicidal. It's annoying as hell when cars stop for me, like no just go you'll be past me by the time I take one step you're wasting your own time by stopping.

And when there's a continuous stream of cars and no window to cross batching everyone at signaled intersections is more efficient and safer for everyone. Everyone stops at reds and you can physically see them stopped. A zebra crossing on a busy street just takes one person not seeing you.
That would affect only a few borderline trials and would average out with subsequent throws. It would be much more worrisome that the length of a needle or the width of a stripe is not infinitely precise, that would consistently affect all the trials.
But who is the middle class?
This post starts with a jumpscare
https://github.com/combust-labs/firebuild

Build firecracker vmms from dockerfiles. Learned a ton, never did anything with it but I want believe it influenced a bunch of people to look deeper into firecracker.
Needle felting is fun! My daughter got a little needle felting kit for Christmas last year and I ended up doing most of it. I was terrible at it, but we had fun.
> That is debatable. What was the last war it won?

Because war is the continuation of politics by other means, the objectives of a war, and thus the criteria by which we can determine if it was won, are set by politicians.

Unless your country's politicians are the military this means that your military has no way to win wars unless politicians have chosen winnable criteria.

Corporate - the British operation to take back the Falklands is an example of a clear political objective, set by a politician (Margaret Thatcher, the UK Prime Minister) and achievable by military force. If the British kill millions of Argentinians, but must fall back and cede the island, Corporate fails. If the Argentinians shit themselves and run off once the carrier fleet sets sail, Corporate has succeeded with little loss of life. As it happens the British invaded the Falklands on foot, at considerable cost in men, but they won the day, the Falklands remains very much British.

When American politicians set vague objectives, or none at all, it is not the fault of the military when the war does not succeed.
It wasn’t but that is VERY similar haha. Wonder if this person had the same idea as I did. Namely “hey this idea is cool! I MUST build it myself to tinker with.” Lmao

After much sleuthing, I finally found the original comment. It has a link to images of the built out project which is nice and in the replies the OP posts links to the GitHub gist. If any interest in my react version I can make that public too, just know it was quick and dirty but does work.

https://news.ycombinator.com/context?id=37036108
Aha yeah true
The comment we're both responding to is about the validity of modern pharmaceutical research and what kinds of medicines they produce as an outcome of US federal government investment. "Before industrialization" is over 400 years ago.
Microphysical Interactions Determine the Effectiveness of Solar Radiation
> Canada has a worse debt-to-income ratio than any other G7 country, with a total consumer debt of $2.5 trillion. That’s more than Canada’s GDP.

> Higher education was supposed to be an investment in my future. But now students like me are stuck paying off their debts over years or even decades. This is largely due to the mismatch between the high cost of education and low, stagnating starting wages

Meanwhile political campaigns at both provincial and federal levels are mostly ad hominem attacks and fear mongering ("it'll be the end of the world with the other guy").
I saw a rant on here about this not so long ago: it feels ridiculous that nearly all of our security code is compiled using compilers that cannot provide the guarantees these algorithms need.
May I remind you that an entire US Navy Carrier Strike Group can't handle[1][2][3][4] a bunch of deranged desert goat herders lobbing explosive tin cans at them and the shipping lane they're supposed to protect?

The US hasn't won a war ever since WW2, and our top-of-the-world military has always lost to guerillas armed with nothing more complicated than an AK-47 and a Toyota pickup. Our best jet fighter's sole kill is a fucking balloon.

No, the US's track record is French levels of trash and I fear more for ourselves than the enemy in an actual peer war where they will be armed with something better than AK-47s and balloons.

[1]: https://apnews.com/article/us-navy-yemen-houthis-israel-war-...

[2]: >“This is the most sustained combat that the U.S. Navy has seen since World War II — easily, no question,” said Bryan Clark, a former Navy submariner and a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. “We’re sort of on the verge of the Houthis being able to mount the kinds of attacks that the U.S. can’t stop every time, and then we will start to see substantial damage.

[3]: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/08/24/red-sea-houthis-...

[4]: >There isn’t a Prosperity Guardian ship within 500 miles. Back in May when the carrier USS Dwight D Eisenhower was present, the US had 12 warships on station providing a mix of missile picket and escorting duties. Now they have zero. ... There can only be one conclusion: that the US has given up on Operation Prosperity Guardian. It wasn’t deterring the Houthis and it wasn’t reassuring shipping so they might as well go and do something else.
I'll add to the chorus of how cool and interesting this is, and how potentially useful. Got a newsletter?
Absolutely.

There are nearly 2B smartphones sold each year and only 200M laptops, so Apple's 20M laptop sales are basically a rounding error and not worth considering.

As 15-16% of the smartphone market, Apple is generally selling around 300m phones. I've read that Qualcomm is usually around 25-35% of the smartphone market which would be 500-700M phones.

But Qualcomm almost certainly includes ARM processors in their modems which bumps up those numbers dramatically. Qualcomm also sells ARM chips in the MCU/DSP markets IIRC.
There are no "gotchas" and I am trying to have a discussion not an argument. The point is that for evaluating a product people have different goals and thus get different value propositions. In particular, I think a pi is a fine product if you value stuff being new and well supported (this also applies in the comparison with other, more powerful SBCs for the same price). If you don't, that is perfectly fine.

In the same vein, why do you prefer or not prefer your mini pc over some random, new n100 mini pc? I would argue that neither is strictly better and that reducing matters to "X is bad, period" is oversimplifying.
Didn't think of that.

I think a bankruptcy restructuring would do a world of good for Boeing, the sooner the better. The longer it keeps in this state, the further behind it gets.
Yep! I had the Zenfone with an Intel processor in it, and it worked well!
> PureScript allows you to remove specific fields from a record type. This feature, is called record subtraction, and it allows more flexibility when transforming or narrowing down records.

TypeScript does allow you to remove specific fields, if I understand you right [0]:

function removeField<T, K extends keyof T>(obj: T, field: K): Omit<T, K> {
const { [field]: _, ...rest } = obj;
return rest;
}

type Person = { name: string; age: number };
declare const p: Person;
const result = removeField(p, 'age'); // result is of type: Omit<Person, "age">

> PureScript allows you to abstract over rows using higher-kinded types. You can create polymorphic functions that accept any record with a flexible set of fields and can transform or manipulate those fields in various ways. This level of abstraction is not possible in TypeScript.

Again, if I understand you correctly, then TypeScript is able to do fancy manipulations of arbitrary records [1]:

type StringToNumber<T> = {
[K in keyof T]: T[K] extends string ? number : T[K]
}

function stringToLength<T extends Record<string, unknown>>(obj: T): StringToNumber<T> {
const result: Record<string, unknown> = {};
for (const key in obj) {
result[key] = typeof obj[key] === 'string' ? obj[key].length : obj[key];
}
return result as StringToNumber<T>;
}

const data = {
name: "Alice",
age: 30,
city: "New York"
};

const lengths = stringToLength(data);

lengths.name // number
lengths.age // number
lengths.city // number

[0] https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?#code/GYVwdgxgLglg9mABA...

[1] https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?#code/C4TwDgpgBAysBOBLA...

edit: provided links to TS playground
Once the line is completely blurred between weapons of mass destruction and mass weapons of destruction, then what?
> The question is more of will your customers agree to go along with this major architectural shift that sets you back on price-performance-power curves by at least five years and moves you out of the mainstream of board support packages, drivers, and everything else software-wise for phones.

Embedded is moving to RISC-V where they have low performance needs.

One example is the Espressif line of CPUs - which have shipped over 1B units. They have moved most of their offerings to RISC-V over the last few years and they are very well supported by dev tools: https://www.espressif.com/en/products/socs
What does this do that ollama webUI cant do? Just curious
If the app is "clean" in terms of respecting users and privacy, I'm totally inclined to rate it when asked.
I appreciate the resources required to make them.
You can now run any huggingface model using the following command

ollama run hf.co/{username}/{repository}

Example: ollama run hf.co/peakji/steiner-32b-preview-gguf:Q4_K_M

Source: https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/en/ollama
It does when a huge portion of the injuries military personnel sustain are quite different from the genteel public, and wouldn't have happened if that person decided to be a teacher instead.
What really gets attention is "consent orders" where if the regulated entity doesn't clean up the act, then that line of business, or the whole entity, gets shut down.

Often you may see this result in a divestiture, as in, unable to clean up, so we'll sell the client base to someone with better systems. (In theory. Almost inevitably, this drags a few legacy systems over anyway.)
The effort to vet MQTT providers, integrate them, and configure everything properly, understand and work around MQTT and implementation quirks, and the protocol overhead were greater than doing something directly on top of TCP, and I don't believe I lost any features that I needed.
Yes, publishing confidential documents that expose government crimes, including war crimes. On the one hand, people argue for things like free speech and human rights, but on the other hand, the same people play petty semantics games to cover up their own society's shortcomings. Are you truly a supporter of free speech and human rights, or are you just anti-$OTHER_GROUP? Behavior like this are actively harmful to the ideals of free speech and human rights.
It's the norm now as well.

Only the target has changed. The land grabs and slurs and dehumanization are essentially the same, if sometimes with a modern twist.
No. Just memorizing words won’t get you there. Looking up the definition of “go” and memorizing it won’t teach you that “go over” means review, that “go under” means to go out of business, that “go on” means to continue, etc, etc, etc.

You need a lot of input before you’ll understand 75% of the text in a language. Vocabulary flashcards (preferably with audio) can help make some very simple dialogues or stories comprehensible at the beginning but flashcards are not enough for learning a language.
It's easy enough to add row polymorphism if there is no subtyping involved. It is an entirely different matter otherwise. For example if a function needs to take a record containing x as a field with type int, it should also accept a record with y as a field that it does not use. This is just like in traditional OOP if a function takes a base class pointer, you can pass a subclass class pointer instead, just that these subtyping relationships are not explicitly defined by users but inferred by the record contents. There is width subtyping and there is also depth subtyping. And we also need awareness of contravariance and covariance.

I implemented the above as a toy type checker. I found the above combination of features too complicated and they end up being unintuitive for the user: the type errors are difficult to comprehend when type errors are found. My implementation is here: https://gist.github.com/kccqzy/d761b8adc840333af0303e1b822d7... and I mostly followed the paper but I cannot guarantee there aren't bugs.
Is "AI SaaS bro discovers not everything has a JSON API" the new "startup bro just reinvented a bus"?
Somehow, I have a rather small one: https://www.ioccc.org/2012/kang/kang.c

I think I have submitted once or twice before that got won, and all other entries were excessively long to be honest. Guess a conciseness is a virtue.
It's way more portable: You can run Brainfuck on an old HP calculator, where Rust would be too bloated: https://forum.swissmicros.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1903&p=83...
Can a pistol be blamed for a murder?
Yes, we export it to everywhere, without permits.
It seems like Chinese app developers will want some sort of middle layer that they write to in order to get compatibility. Obviously, a lot of developers currently use cross-platform toolkits, but it's unclear how well the popular ones will support something that is strictly for the Chinese market.
Didn't Google deploy it to some of its smart speaker devices a while ago tho?
Thanks!

Rust macros are typed, so the language server should be able to give good suggestions. They are also optional, and you can always use the code they generate directly. In most cases, it won't be too verbose either.
Staying at your parents while studying means a local university which one might not be able to get in, or it could a worse choice.

Not all parents can afford to help their kids with their debts, we don't know details about their financial situation.
I know I have my heart broken multiple times a day, it's just cruel!
And you can bet the people who replaced them would put in additional protections for it going forward.
I signed up for an account and tried it out by just deleting the cookie message when it popped up, and it seemed to work fine. If there's no way to decline the cookie banner and you just do it anyway even if you don't click accept, what's the point in the cookie banner?
> Our work highlights that current defensive programming
techniques are more akin to anecdotal workarounds to
compilers’ behavior rather than a systematic solution.
Our results point out that high-level constant-time code is prone to dangerous transformations and optimizations from compilers and calls for cooperation between developers of
security-critical libraries and general-purpose compilers.

All optimizing compilers perform optimizations based on the notion of an abstract machine, which determines what semantics of the original program must be conserved. And the abstract machine for a given language is usually provided by the language that is being implemented (except for e.g. languages that just give up and say "give me C's abstract machine").

You definitely don't want compiler backends trying to "guess" when some defensive programming technique is being used, so that they can compile it conservatively. That's a dead-end pathway to madness. You need languages to give you the power to explicitly say "this operation is constant time, don't mess with it". And in practice they do give you this power, via inline assembly. Of course inline assembly is suboptimal for a lot of reasons, and we can certainly try to do better, but this is a language design problem, not an optimizing compiler problem.
Seems like a hard problem to solve, because even if you mark some block of code as DO_NOT_OPTIMIZE it still is likely to pull in code from elsewhere that probably has been optimized. Seems like you might have to actually just write the relevant code in inlined machine code.
The best way I've found is: stop using apps. If I'm using the phone, in either making a phone call or using Firefox. Apps might "solve some need", but it seems like all of them are more interested in data collection and selling that data to "their partners". We're better off throwing these black mirrors into the ocean.
It's clickable for me now, at least.
Adobe made its painting app free to take on Procreate