skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Using subwords makes your sequences shorter, which makes them cost less.

Besides that, for alphabetic languages, there exists almost no relation between form and meaning. I.e.: “ring” and “wing” differ by one letter but have no real common meaning. By picking the character or byte as your choice of representation, the model basically has to learn to distinguish ring and wing in context. This is a lot of work!

So, while working on the character or byte level saves you some embeddings and thus makes your model smaller, it puts all of the work of distinguishing similar sequences with divergent meanings on the model itself, which means you need a larger model.

By having subwords, a part of this distinguishing work already has been done by the vocabulary itself. As the article points out, this sometimes fails.
It’s fine. My honest interpretation of it is that you’re not well informed. But I gave you the benefit of the doubt thinking that maybe I can learn more in case you actually knew what you’re talking about.

Good day to you sir.
Particularly in the AI assisted era, I'm not sure I understand why you wouldn't just roll your own auth. Learn it once, use it everywhere. Best practices are well documented and now incredibly accessible via your LLM of choice.
While I agree with the authors sentiment and do try not to include 'click here' links in any of the content I'm asked to post. I disagree with his assertion that it's confusing and slows people down.

Having been on the Internet almost daily since the late 90's. I can say with some degree of certainty that the ambitiousness of 'click here' links on the Internet has more or less trained people to look for them.

In the authors example

Jcrew email receipt

For additional order details, please click here to go to your account.

For additional order details, go to your account.

Not only do I immediately understand 'click here' to go to my account, but 'click here' conveys that the link will deep link me directly to the referenced section or pertinent information that the sentence is discussing.

Alternately a 'your account' link, does not convey this message. It tells me I am going to a general account management interface, and will then need to browse around to find the information or section referenced by the sentence.

I believe 'click here' links have their place and convey the very specific message that they should deep link someone directly to the content referenced in the link and not just to a site that contains the referenced content somewhere on the page.
> Anyone who tells you they know how to make that grow faster is selling something

I don't know, ask FDR how he did it (hint: it did not involve less government spending or crippling agencies)
This is not a tool to verify HTML, it's a tool to support the act of handwriting HTML, and that's what it does :^)
There is no evidence that, under the NEL, more digital copies of books were borrowed than physical copies were (un)available in the closed libraries. I've not re-read all the materials from the lower court recently, but IIRC publishers didn't even bother to argue this point. Did you find any place where the judge relied on this?
The methodology seems to assume what it is trying to prove with the predefined dimensions being measured.

Another methodology might be attribution: provide a number of stories and ask readers to assess whether actions were due to wisdom, enlightened self-interest, social norms, etc.

Also, stories of Socrates and others long have presented wisdom as a kind of foolishness for outing others’ ignorance or failing to assert one’s own interest in games of mutual self-interest. So a follow-on question for each story would be whether wisdom really led to the best course of action.
Congratulations to WaPo for making a completely unusable web site. At least the Swarkowski ad displays.

https://archive.is/8k42x
Long and winding but you make cogent points. Shit pisses me off too. Already a couple 'but, but... they consented to this when they installed it!' comments here. Those types know not what kind of corporate misbehavior they enable, nay are complicit in.
simply pausing before speaking, even for a second, has done wonders for me... you can gain a little more time with a well placed "hmmm" occasionally
The Manikins and Bridge Command: The Return
Because Arm wants to increase the royalties for the cores designed by Qualcomm, that is a pretty certain indication that these royalties have been smaller than for the cores licensed from Arm.

Therefore Arm cares a lot if Qualcomm designs their own cores, because that would cause a smaller revenue for Arm.

If Arm had not cared whether Qualcomm designs their own cores, they would have never sued Qualcomm.

The official reason why Arm has sued Qualcomm, is not for increasing the royalties, because that has no legal basis.

It is obvious that the lawsuit is just a blackmail instrument to force Qualcomm to pay higher royalties for the cores designed by them, but the official object of the lawsuit is to forbid Qualcomm to design their own cores, by claiming that the Oryon cores used in the new Qualcomm chipsets for laptops, smartphones and automotive applications have been designed by violating the conditions of the architectural licenses granted by Arm to Qualcomm and Nuvia, so Arm requests that Qualcomm must stop making any products with these Arm-compatible cores and they must destroy all their existing core designs.
It does not make sense to dedicate full read port for reading PC. Just run a bus directly from the register cells, which is exactly how it is done in ARM7TDMI in question.
It's frustrating that nobody actually offers evidence for the drugs either being available or unavailable. Can Nordisk point to a warehouse with enough available supply to meet the capacity that the compounders are cranking out? Or can the compounders point to a bunch of customers waiting on unfulfilled shipments from Nordisk?
Intel DOIT instruction list does not include DIV: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/t...
> and how much functionality is really only available through GUI

Isn't the GUI driven by code? Can anything at all in the GUI work that can't be done programmatically?
They insulted him, he angrily insulted him back with "pedoboy". Childish? Sure. So what. Nobody believed he was really a "pedoboy". Musk did not mount a campaign against him.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=sJNK4VKeoBM
SuperHTML can be used as a normal CLI tool, if you can integrate it with Vim to run it on save (and ideally parse the error trace), then you're all set.
Because writing the addresses is not the important part. You can write IPv6 addresses as dotted decimal. The length is the problem, IPv6 format is more compact. Addresses are not the hard part in upgrading.

The embedding doesn't help with compatibility. IPv4 still can't access IPv6. IPv6 can't access IPv4. It actually breaks NAT64, which depends on special prefix.

Also, extending IPv4 address space has the problem that bake the misallocation into IPv6. IPv4 is broken in the small chunks that makes the routing table large. It also means that new organizations will have a hard time getting address space cause they need to get IPv4 addresses.
LOL, You summed up my elementary school years XD
PyDBSP: Differential Dataflow for the Masses
I realise it's the opposite of what you are asking, but I still wanted to take the opportunity to mention that there are many advantages with plaintext emails: https://useplaintext.email.

It's okay to allow those who want to use beautiful (I assume it means HTML) emails, but you should always include a plaintext version (it's easy) for those who don't want to/can't read HTML emails.
Yeah, I get that people need papers. I just don't see how paying to have one's name added to a sham paper with a handful of other unrelated paying customers could possibly help to meet that requirement.

If I told my committee that I got another paper accepted, and it was one of these papers, and they so much as glanced at the title and co-authors, they'd be like, "wtf?" And my academic career would be irreparably ruined.
There's comfort in settling for mediocrity. Muddling through at your own pace instead of grasping for the ideal.
I wish that Kubernetes had started as IPv6-only or IPv6-first. IPv6 is perfect for giving each pod its own address. There is more space for giving each host a subnet, or giving each pod its own address in the subnet.

That would have gotten rid of the CNI overlay networks. It would also made barrier between the internal and external networks. It would require running NAT64 and DNS64 in most clusters.
I avoid news for a reason this article does not mention: its consistent bias toward drama wastes time on trivialities and misinforms by exaggerating the significance of unlikely events. I always vote, and I am always curious about what is going on in the world, but exposing myself to "the news" would create a lot of stress without leaving me significantly better-informed - so I just don't. If it actually matters, I'll hear about it, and if I'm curious, I'll read up on it; but a steady feed of crime and scandal and political horse-racing does nobody any good.
Imagine how much disarray the dems will be in if there is no one to report on the dems being in disarray.
Why you should use Go
Yes, but you're starting to get to the size where you need some real PG expertise to keep the wheels on. If your data is growing CH will just work out of box for a lot longer.
> unshakable foundations in reality

Yes, you are correct that it entirely lays in the reputation of the AI.

This discussion leads to interesting question, which is "what is quality?"

Quality is determined by perception. If we can agree that an AI is acting like a user and it can use your website, we can assume that a user can use your website and therefor it is "quality".

For more, read "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance"
I've never seen the language server that ships with VSCode produce any kind of diagnostic whatsoever, so I think it just doesn't implement any error checking.
The progress we've made thanks to WFH is immense and will be clear to the future generations only in hindsight, just like 5-day work week.
There's no doubt in my mind that this sort of technology and omnipresent surveillance helps the police solve crimes. That is obviously beneficial to the rest of us. However it gets back to the old argument over trading liberty for safety.

It's long been established that you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy when moving about in public. However that precident was established at a time when tracking people en masse was technically impossible. An individual, or a place could be surveilled, but not everyone, everywhere.

To my mind, such mass surveillance databases, given that they are now possible and do have some clear beneficial uses, must be protected in ways that were not necessary in the past. Warrants should be required to access the data for specific places at specific times, at minimum. And the governments that contract for these services should own the data, not Flock or other vendors.
> buying stuff

I was buying more generic stuff before, now I’m buying products that are tailor made for the very specific demographic I am. Win-win for me and for the entrepreneur targeting me. Who cares if Facebook also benefits? Who cares if that entrepreneur becomes a billionaire? I get a gadget/book/product that solves my specific problem. I just don’t see how I, or anyone, is the victim here.

> socially better

I have vastly more contact with family and old friends now. I’ve had career opportunities from Facebook messages with old pals.

> people are going nuts due to social media

I have no answer to this one, except that we clearly have to mature into this as a culture, the same way we’ve done with phasing out smoking and are currently phasing out alcohol.

People are only getting sucked into social media vortexes because of bad mental habits they had going into it. Banning social media for under-16’s and changing attitudes towards it will certainly help a ton. If you use it as a connection tool, it’s amazingly valuable and helpful.
When I was a postdoc, my office-mate referred to them as LPUs -- "least publishable units". Squeeze as many papers as possible out of each real idea or achievement.

It contributed a lot toward my fleeing academia.
I'd like to know how that impacts their reporting strategy and what their contingency plan is for it. I'm also curious if they've considered hiring outside or international assistance to fill the gaps; not sure the NLRB considerations but easier to ask forgiveness than permission? Have they considered riding it out and seeing what happens?

I'm just curious of the inside thinking of management with how to deal with this unique situation.
The nearly unlimited acquisition of private data should be tightly regulated, ephemeral by default, require total transparency in disclosure to any party for any use. Any time any ad or government agency or private individual obtains your data, you should be notified at the expense of the entity obtaining the data. Everything should be proactive and favor the rights of individuals. Not following regulations should be lethal to corporations, disincentivizing the mindless global surveillance apparatus we have now.
Firebase has to be some of the worst DX I have encountered in the wild. Truly shocking. Also, trusting any Google product is probably unwise.
>I'd love for someone to explore expanded "digital" warrant courts and civilian oversight commissions instead of preemptive blanket ban of this technology via lawsuit.

No. Just normal warrants for surveillance like always, and ban "warrantless" subscriptions to data sources that might be used to investigate or prosecute crime.

Here's a New York Times article for today "As Election Nears, Kelly Warns Trump Would Rule Like a Dictator"

And you want warrantless broad spectrum surveillance to prevent crime.
Or Apache Doris, which sounds more Clickhouse-y in its performance properties from what I've read

(disclaimer: I have not used either yet)

Plus it has a MySQL-flavoured client connector where Clickhouse does its own thing, so may be easier to integrate with some existing tools.
the modern twist is that large health startups like Hims and 23andme are getting into the compounding business and the drug makers arent happy to have the competition.
It's not just that, I've never seen any other HTML language server produce diagnostics at all. All the major editors use the VSCode stock HTML language server and that thing just doesn't produce any diagnostic at all.
> By paying around €180 to €5000 (approximately US$197 - $5472), a person can have their name listed as the author of research paper, without having to painstakingly do research and write the results.

That's quite a bargain compared to "reputable" publishers who take similar amounts to do not much more than holding a paywall.
8pm - Hillary shows as having a 99% chance of winning the presidential election.
9pm - Hillary has a 0% chance of winning.

Turning rapidly changing and imprecisely known information into a widget was just one of their astonishing number of problems, but, more than anything, it symbolized to me their absolute arrogance that they were the source of societal trends rather than merely teasing out hints from incomplete data like any other peon.
Time. People who were right in retrospect seem wiser than those who were not.

Obviously this is a fallible standard but it's pretty much all we've got.
That probably serves as an indicator that some programs aren't so much as glancing at the title and co-authors.
Apple Releases First Betas of iOS 18.2 with Genmoji and ChatGPT Integration
Cofounder of Clerk here - we dramatically lowered our prices starting December 2023:
https://clerk.com/blog/new-pricing-plans

10,000 MAUs are now included in every plan. We also now offer "First Day Free", so if a user churns in their first 24 hours after signing up, they are never counted as active. For GenAI, this has led to 60-70% of sign ups never being charged as active users.
Blog post author. I think AuthKit is the best solution today!

But you really need to implement email change for users. It's a joke that it's not offered, that's a standard feature for every SaaS v0.1
There's value in following people with strong conviction who are decisive in certain situations. Like a battlefield, for example.

On the other hand, delusional cult leaders also have strong conviction but it doesn't pay to drink their kool aid.
As a metaphor I'd suggest that (Wis = IQ * EQ) might be more accurate -- it is difficult for someone with low emotional awareness to make up the difference with intelligence alone, just as it is difficult for someone of low intelligence to become wise with nothing but high emotional awareness.
> I don't think that not implemented method should return 5xx, because it is pointless to retry it.

Pedantically, that's not true - it can be unimplemented at T0 and then a deploy happens and it will be implemented at T1. You are likely thinking of retries within the milliseconds timeframe, but even that could be true in a race-condition-esque situation where a redeploy was happening and the request just got unlucky

In the context of this thread, not allowed is quite different from "happens to not be present." I think of the distinction like 404 versus 410 Gone <https://http.cat/status/410> in a temporal state
The diameter of the resulting tunnels is too small. They are not as large as subway tunnels.

Also, many tunnels used for public transportation are built as cut and cover rather than bored tunnels. It's much cheaper. E.g., most of the New York Subway.

There is no room for rapid disruption in the technology because it's been around so long. This is just like how you don't see many startup companies coming in and deciding to disrupt the hand tool industry or the

I agree about getting back to the point of contention: what I was really saying is that Twitter and social media sites like it are a well-established business model. Twitter isn't losing money for Elon because Twitter was a company with bad fundamentals before he bought it. Twitter is losing money for Elon because he overpaid for the company and has mismanaged it compared to his predecessors. If Twitter were a public company today it would have more users, higher market cap, better customer satisfaction, and either higher profits or more modest losses. Twitter may not have been spectacularly profitable but it was in no way shape or form endangered or mismanaged before Elon took the helm.
I can see how the following "services" would be helpful to a desperate academic:

1. Paying to have one's legitimate manuscript accepted, instead of going through the normally time-consuming and capricious process of reviews and revisions and re-submissions.

2. Paying to build up the citation count for existing publications.

But the what the article is describing seems to be well beyond that and crazy.
you're assuming they're not 1) a bot, 2) a paid shill, or 3) stirring the pot simply to piss people off out of boredom or whimsey
Can sue Character.AI but not the gun manufacturer, or whomever let a 14-year-old boy get hold of a handgun. I wonder if the AI companies can argue in court that AIs don't kill people.
> finally agreeing that perpetuation of sapience ... beyond the heat death of the universe is a good goal, much better than the common banal drivel that drives our wars or religions today.

If you are looking for a goal, then you are looking for a fight or a war.

Instead, a good goal is what comes from the good lessons of religions: the idea that humanity is nothing, that you are nothing, that your plans are nothing, and all that matters is the creator and the rewards he set abound around the problems that you struggle against. Lessons like good vs evil are derived from this paradigm. And the paradigm also inspires studying the universe from obsession with the creator's enigma.

OTOH all ideas that lead to war and conflict grow from obsession with the self. If not the self, then with your people, and if not the people then with your hatred for anyone other than your self and your people.
You can do things far more interesting than that with the dossiers on everyone that absolutely exist right now and that algorithms are constantly being run over. You can frame people for crimes for which you know they will have no defense, exactly like the Stasi did, and privately confront them about it. As they plead their innocence, tell them that you want to believe them, and if they can do a little work for you, they'll not only be arrested, but be rewarded! How would you like a job at Mother Jones, or the Guardian?
I don't find remote work alienating at all. Even when I'm in the office most of my meetings are over VC with other sites anyway.

So... no thanks! Would rather work in comfort, silence, and near my dog.
Agreed, Firebase is the worst. Google's impenetrable documentation, paired with frequent breaking changes, opaque pricing model (paired with asking for your card details but not letting you set a limit at which the app should turn off), trigger-happy product sunsetting, etc. etc. should be enough to turn anyone away.

And this isn't even getting started on how bad the DX is in general. I have found Pocketbase to be so much easier for basic auth (obviously it's too simplistic if you need major scale SSO solutions...)
We took this approach at Industry Dive already because of these reasons. diveaccess.com
Ew. The examples in the 'Real Examples' look terrible, especially the last two. You usually shouldn't put links in the middle of a text. If you have a link and a description, rather use

description : >Click here<

The last example does it right, the example above it is almost right. And this holds even more on real websites, where the links are not underlined and blue.

Some exceptions are hypertext heavy documents, like wikipedia, or a dictionary. But if you want to point somewhere, refer something, or provide an option to an action, you shouldn't put that in the middle of a sentence or in the middle of a line. Put it at the end.
By standalone web component do you mean like a React component that you can embed in your own app ? Or something more "bundled" like a VS Code extension ?

In terms of scope, you are thinking of both the "Editor" and the "Schema builder" ?

My initial intention was more to build a monolith app, like a simple version of MS Office for jsons. There are already some strong links between the notions of workspace and document: for example the Link field captures an id of another document or record that you have in your workspace, same for File and Image fields... (I guess a next step in the future would be to incorporate the notions of users & groups...). That could probably be abstracted by having something more plugin-based where you provide to the component your description for "what is another document" or "what is a file".

But I think I got your point as well that, if it is deemed to be a framework, it would be useful to let other platforms or verticalized apps use the same representation !
> Can we also go to XHTML5, while on it?

Personally, I would like that, but in practice I don't think it's ever going to be a thing, so I didn't even bother adding support for it in SuperHTML, sorry!
I don't think that would work. The IPv6 Notation is only the human representation. Inside the package it is a 128 bit integer. IPv4 addresses can already be put there. The problem is that everyone still needs to support a package with 128 bit addresses instead of 32 bit. There is simply no space in the IPv4 package format for the 128 bit addresses. Or anything bigger than 32 bit.
Google tried something with Fuchsia. They didn't get far. /s
From Tokens to Words: On the Inner Lexicon of LLMs