skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Well sure, I’m not trying to say that the internet is less capable generally now than in the past.

I’m suggesting that the way you build an app is shaped by the prevalence of NAT, the same way the apps you build are shaped by how much bandwidth home users have for devices.

Some types of apps benefit from p2p functionality, and those hit obstacles for normal users due to port forwarding requirements, and are largely impossible which CG. I don’t think NAT is a villain, just something that does affect what and how we build stuff.
No, because the debris = tiny pieces of aluminum, will be pushed around by solar radiation.
Also, there’re tiny meteorites, and other pieces of debris colliding with it, which adds energy to the system, if you like.
TLEs are not maintained for small debris, so you can’t really predict conclusively. But my hunch is that eventually, the orbit will become a bit more parabolic, precession of which could put it into a trajectory of a S/C and cause a collision.
1Blocker works pretty great in Safari (all devices). I like the iCloud sync.
this was Soviet system as well, where student draw a random card with 3 exam questions (out of all curriculum) and had to prepare and answer question in person verbally in from of a panel of professors.

This system truly forced students to grind the hell out of science
The only counter to the money argument is tough regulation that results in jail time. If the whiners can point to an example of white collar criminal enforcement their complaints suddenly have teeth.
They call that a "BQ" or Boston Qualified.

But it actually doesn't guarantee you entry because for that age group (Male 18 - 30?) there ends up being too many qualified entrants so they have to shave down the actual time required for entry.

When I was running, it was 3:05 for example but you had to run a <3:03 to make it in.
>They can, if congress passed a law telling them to do so.

Louder for the people in the back.
Sysadmin war story: "The network ate my font "
Facepalm. What idiots are running this AI show? If AI is used to detect AI, the new game becomes "write text that cannot be detected by an AI".

- To the AI detector: "update your AI detection based on this new set of AI-generated content"

- To the AI writer: "update your AI writing to evade this new AI detector"

- Repeat

This is keystone cops.
It doesn't run for me either on Safari :/
if it changes speed vector, it'll be in an eccentric orbit with one of either perigee or apogee at GEO.
Or humans and scratchy lotteries
…don't think there needs to be drastic changes, just some small things that allow the education and curriculum to become more engaging.

I think the vast majority of people who say and think this haven’t taught in the classroom much.
Swapping out loggers at runtime is a separate concern (inheritance and OOP don't make that any easier), and is more to do with control flow or whether there's an indirection when accessing the logger.
Musk claimed we would be on Mars in 2022 so... https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/sep/27/elon-musk...
It's a quote that initially was in a hilarious context, but here it's seemingly out of place, and not really funny, almost feels forced in there randomly so it comes off pretentious.

Maybe if it was something like "Once upon a time humankind discovered the scientific method, the most accurate tool that they had so far. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move. To help with that here we have spotted some inaccurate articles to appease the angry."
Definitely miss the old forums, direct messaging groups, IRCs and so on. But I'm really glad with Mastodon. It definitely captures a lot of that community feel.
The people who actually learned the math work in STEM careers, not fancied up sales careers.
> It's not a limited resource like domains or IP4 addresses.

I'm curious why you say it's not a limited resource.

Although you could theoretically expand the length of UPC every couple years to keep growing, the reality is that all the systems communicating these numbers back and forth need to have a standard.

In addition, printed barcodes need to fit within the area they are designed to fit in, if they were regularly increasing in size it would impact various systems (e.g. conveyor systems scanners, item labels, etc.)
When I visit a new city I trust google maps more than I trust myself with a paper map, it even knows all public transport routes and times, and can guide me through connecting different types of public transports (e.g.: bus + train) to get to my destination quicker/cheaper, that would take me and a paper map quite a bit longer to plan.
Sure are an awful lot of armchair experts in here.
But if the difference is minimal, does it really qualify as failure?
> I think people are using the word "fail" a little too much.

The issue is when it's combined with "spectacularly".

As in: "I spectacularly failed at boiling my eggs. I let them boil for 7 minutes instead of 6 minutes 30. What a spectacular fail".

But nobody gives a flying f--k about my failed eggs.
There is no way to spectacularly fail a marathon. Hell even if you didn't finish in the alloted time you still did something healthy.

The author is just trying to inflate his personal goal, to achieve some self set time, big enough so he can turn it into a self serving post that he can post to HN.

I don't really blame the author to be fair, nowadays this is kinda the thing people do, but I do get tired of the constant hyperbole.
Absolutely! Hence the fear. Technology is a double-edged sword - there are always upsides and downsides. With most technologies it seems as though we only discuss the upsides. Rarely are the downsides discussed, or even mentioned. When it comes to automation technology though, the focus always quickly shifts to the downsides. I think that reflects a deep distrust of civilization and the status quo.
There is much less homework these days than in, say, the 1980’s. This is true across all levels of education.
Setting aside the cause and focusing on the symptoms - I simply would not want to be in business with someone with poor attention to detail and time management skills.
Any hints on optimal encoding for videos, to reduce storage and network bandwidth? I would go even for a compromise in video quality, to have them looking more akin to Encarta '98 videos, if it greatly reduces file size.
We used to write essays in class on blue books. That can still be done today.
To be comparatively fair, Google doesn't run almost any of it's public products on Google Cloud, either (nor many of the internal apps).
I think this is the reasoned answer.

It’s interesting to observe who is making the counterpoint - it’s often very vocal fundraisers.

Of course you can argue they are raising because they believe, and I don’t (necessarily) doubt that in all cases.
Just one batch is being recalled
Seeing my fellow grad students cheat, then brag in the public student lounge to multiple people about having the highest score on the exam by “oh I didn’t even understand that question I just copied the answer key and I still got the highest score”, broke something in me.

Our institutions are failing us, and I have never been more disillusioned.
I would do it myself but where I am there are almost no corvids, they (and city pigeons) are basically displaced by the highly aggressive local bird. Which seems to swarm around from time to time but doesn't stay anywhere permanent locally except for grocery store parking lots. That's probably enough to leak location info on this anon account so I'll shut up now
GNSS RTK is incredibly accurate these days. By the time that you're close enough to the landing zone, you're close enough to get positioning down to centimeters on consumer grade hardware, which the article points out.

The actual question is literal: Can SpaceX land a rocket with sub 1 cm (1/2 cm) accuracy? GNSS RTK can get you down to a couple of centimeters, but getting more granular resolution than this isn't reliably possible with current professional grade technologies.

I'm personally unsure if the military has greater resolution than what's possible with RTK or w.r.t. military use GPS, but I would not be surprised if they did. If that's the case, NASA would most likely have access to it, I would assume. But the article specifically calls this out saying that it's not accurate enough to surpass the resolution of using RTK.

What's really cool about these questions is that the same problem space is applicable to self-driving cars and SLAM, if you're into that sort of thing. Lane detection, etc.
Insofar as he's associated with "that Dracula story and movie", yes.
Exactly. SaaS does not enter into it.

People will locally run the open models which are freely released, just like they do today with Llama and Whisper.

Most of the AI SaaS companies won't be around to have anything to say about it, because they will be casualties of the bust that will follow the boom. There will be a few survivors with really excellent models, and some people will pay for those, while many others simply use the good-enough freely available ones.
All this, and yet no link to read it?
> I need a job. I now give easy tests.

That seems more of an indictment of your profession than anything to do with the students.
Ask HN: Why doesn't ChatGPT have a homework mode with assignment-specific rules?
The teacher would specify what sorts of responses are allowed for each assignment.

For example, grammar help could be allowed, but not idea-generation help.

ChatGPT could even fingerprint the output with the assignment code.
Newer codecs compress better at the cost of a more complex decoder. so maybe av1 or h.265 at a low bitrate?
You can do even better with radar. If you place a set of radar reflectors around the tower at known locations, then you can detect them from the booster and triangulate the distances to a precise position. Plus, radar gives you relative velocities, so your speed and roll rate estimatimates get even more precise. I bet you could get down to millimeters with a setup like this.
oop, I got the hacker news hug of death. I'm currently setting up the image CDN now.
We had in class essays in my history class in highschool. “Write everything you know about the triple entente” or something like that was often the prompt. You were merely expected to pay attention in class to pass not bring in outside research.
"Azure’s Security Vulnerabilities Are Out of Control" - https://www.lastweekinaws.com/blog/azures_vulnerabilities_ar...
My friend. Thank you. It is not often I get to be myself lately. Allow me to retort in kind.

Your original response to my response was in turn a response to the following sentence by "snovv_crash":

"This isn't a matter of the government saying what you need to do. This is a matter of being held criminally liable if people get hurt."

I do want to point out that from the beginning the narrow scope of this argument defined the type of liability as criminal and not civil as your post suggested. In other words, your whole point kinda falls apart as I was not talking about civil liability, but about the connection of civics and government's ( or society's depending on your philosophical bent ) monopoly on violence.

It is possible that the word civic threw you off, but I was merely referring to the study of the rights, duties, and obligations of citizens in a society. Surely, you would agree that writing code that kills people would be under the purview of the rights, duties and obligations of individuals in a society?

In either case, I am not sure what are you arguing for here, It is not just that you are wrong, but you seem to be oddly focused on trying to .. not even sure. Maybe I should ask you instead.

<<More interesting to me is how you came to the impression that you had any idea what you were talking about to the point you felt justified in making your post.

Yes, good question. Now that I replied I feel it would not be a bad idea ( edit: for you ) to present why you feel ( and I use that verb consciously ) you can just throw salad willy-nilly not only with confidence, but, clearly, justification worthy of a justicar.

tldr: You are wrong, but can you even accept that you are wrong.. now that will be an interesting thing to see.

<< that you had any idea

I am a guy on the internet man. No one has any idea about anything. Cheer up:D
Are you saying all you needed was attention? :)
Unless you do fairly extreme stuff I suspect the risk is more about driving to ski areas in winter on a regular basis
You don’t see the problem.

It’s better to have all your logic be loosely coupled down to the smallest primitive.

What’s the point of tying up groups of logic together and glue it up with state and say this is the fundamental unit of composition?

You see the problem? 2 years down the line you find out that a certain class has methods that are better reused in another context but it’s so tightly coupled that the refactoring is insanity.

Better to have had state decoupled from function and to have functions decoupled from each other and not tied together by common state. If you do this you get rid of all the fundamental technical debt that arises from oop. You guys don’t see it. Oop is a major cause of technical debt because of tight coupling.

We can’t predict the future. You can’t guess that a method that exists in class A will 2 years down the line be better fit in class B or as its own class. So because you can’t know the future isn’t it logically better to not couple all your logic together into these arbitrary bundles called classes?

Break your function down into more smaller modules of computation. The object class is too large.

But then you ask how do I create bigger abstractions? Just compose functions together to form bigger functions. For state Compose struct types together to form bigger structs. Using this method to build your abstractions allows you to break down your abstractions into smaller units whenever you want!

You can’t break down the class. The class is stuck. I can’t reuse a portion of state in another context and I can’t do the same thing with my methods. What’s the point of using classes to place arbitrary and pointless restrictions on modularity? None.
If you can't boot it, they can't hack it.
So get more TAs. They cost less than Class B CDL drivers and will drag themselves over broken glass to take these jobs. And 65 hours of work per semester for oral examinations seems entirely reasonable. A week and a half for an FTE spent observing, with another half week to full week for grading seems completely reasonable for capstone semester work.
My dog can push buttons to let me know what he wants. Those buttons speak in English. Is that language?
Recent discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41871873
You're right, though in this case I was just typing quickly and didn't double check the analogy after reading the post. :)

I have found that a bad network is often worse than no network in that the type of people that work in a way you hate will lead you to jobs that are not right for you. Going back to the point above, this all depends on your risk capacity. I speak that as someone with a high risk capacity. For someone who has not built up reserves, that is terrible advice.
Um, what about using starlink to measure position as option 3!
Making the index is part of the learning.
It's not a "historical design feature" it's a hole in the wall. It's a sign that the dead Boomer whose house you are touring did zero maintenance or renovations for 50+ years.
Arguably, I'm not as concerned about "every action of every user on every machine" as I am the exceptions, and the usability issues the aforementioned "security platform" causes in terms of end user efficiency are probably not offset by the perceived security gains from your POV.

Fwiw, for as much rightful criticism as Google receives for things like killing consumer products and behaving badly with user data, its internal IT runs better than -- in my opinion as an ex-employee -- any other large enterprise in the world. And it's secure.
Yes, but "Dracula author" carries more, and headlines aim to reach as many people as possible.
Thats how these tools mostly already work at least on the instructor side. They flag the problem text and will say where it came from. Its up to the teacher to do this due diligence and see if its a quote that merely got flagged or actual plagiarism.
Wordpl: Wordle with mathematical privacy
You can read it here: https://catalogue.nli.ie/Record/vtls000924296

Go full screen and go to page 2 it starts at about the middle.
This author already has JS Stockholm syndrome and at least acknowledges that up front.
Could use more simulation data with NVIDIA Omniverse and thrust vector control
Most of Earth's meteorites come from a few asteroid break ups
Show HN: A open source geometry dash
Demo ：https://geometrydashjp.com/
Maybe the solution is to get rid of degrees and certifications, and just let the students who actually want to learn attend.
Boston keeps a table of qualifying times that need to be hit. But it's such a popular race, that people train to hit that qualifying time, and they end up with too many runners. The solution is to use a cut-off time to adjust all of the qualifying times. As an example, an 18-34 year old male had a qualifying time of 3 hours exactly for the 2025 Marathon (which qualification ended for last month). The cut-off time required athletes to be 6 minutes and 51 seconds faster than the qualifying time for their age group and gender. So qualification was actually 2:53:09, but no one knew that when they were running. (Next year they've adjusted the times all down 5 minutes to compensate, though they'll likely have around a 2 minute cut off, since the times have been getting faster.)

https://www.baa.org/races/boston-marathon/qualify
It's 134 years old but hasn't been published as a book yet, so surely it requires 100 years of copyright protection starting today!
ChatGPT is just a chatbot app, not the actual tech. The underlying tech is LLM models. There are a plethora of them at this point. They are being used for app-specific features all over the place. If you think a specific app should exist, feel free to create it.
Farewell, Sitelinks Search Box
or somebody write a backend and name it Kaisen
Evolving Wikipedia Entry on the Story "Gibbet Hill" [0]. Plot Summary described on the page.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbet_Hill_(short_story)
Agility is how startups compete with larger organizations
Microsoft just opened a new startup vertical: security services for security logs. If those startups use Azure to run their production workloads, the industry will quickly enter an infinite loop and skyrocket to $2 trillion/yr.
There's an enormous amount of strategy, but all bound up in a few points, and virtually all of them rely on social skills and values that are in short supply these days. It's virtually all in the trading.

If you play Monopoly and you don't trade, you haven't really played. And I don't mean all of the wacky trades that some families do (although I'm not against that), I mean trading money and property with other players. The two keys are:

1. In all games (not just Monopoly), people who cooperate win. If you make a mutually beneficial trade with another player, even if that player gets the better end of the trade, all other players lose ground. If you cooperate with another player by trading whenever there's any reasonable opportunity, the game is between you and that player; no other players will have any chance of winning. If you trade with everyone, and they don't trade between each other, you will inevitably win. Cooperation is making 1 + 1 = 3. No matter how that remainder is split, the more you get in on that split, the more ground you're gaining. Jump in front of every trade offer and offer a better one.

Almost every player that I've talked to who doesn't understand how Monopoly is a good game (and I've had a lot of Monopoly discussions) is completely incapable of understanding how a trade that gives somebody else a Monopoly can result in you winning the game. They look at you like you're stupid when you say you do it all the time. We live in a sick, atomized and alienated society. Getting the property that completes somebody else's Monopoly means you have a good basis for friendship.

2. You may do a lot of little trades during a game, but inevitably you are building up to the big trade which is your big gamble. You've calculated all of the probabilities, you've judged your competitors positions, and you're going to offer another player (or maybe a couple of other players over two succeeding trades) a huge trade which will set the conditions for how the random endgame will play out. You've made it look like you're giving the other end of the trades a chance, but you've calculated ahead of time that you've maximized your own chances. If you're playing against naive players, you'll always win if you do this first and you know what you're doing. If you're playing against someone skilled, it's a question of who calculated the odds better and whether the dice hate you.

edit: Another game with a similar feel and a similar benefit to cooperation is Container. A good game to soften up people who don't know how to trade is Bohnanza. A game designed to show aggressive cooperation is So Long, Sucker, which requires you to cooperate to be in contention, and requires you (mathematically) to betray someone's trust to win.
People would also type in their notes into their graphing calculator or even slip something up their sleeve. Phones aren't the only way to cheat, they are arguably harder than other old fashioned ways to use secretly.
Inside a container registry: The mechanics of push and pull
How do you know it's 10 - 20 years?

I'm not alone though, all the childhood people I grew up with that were exposed to this questionable content seem functioning fine now.

Although I would agree that people and especially children shouldn't use TikTok or addictive things like that, but I'm mainly talking about the content specifically.
> There are also cases where documentation led companies to growth—one example is Stripe.

how do you know this ?
And here is me trying to find sheet metal fab that could make a simple enclosure that matches the design and is not warped or scratched.

Impossible apparently.