skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The way we used to "recycle" plastic was to put it on a container ship along with glass and aluminum and send it to China. Once it arrived, they would recycle the glass and aluminum and bury or burn the plastic. We reduced the quantity of (valuable) aluminum and glass over time until China got mad and told us to stop shipping them just the garbage (plastic). That was largely the end of the show.
Security is tricky because correct programs (including in C) can have security problems, like side channel attacks and whatnot.

You can write code which you think erases some security-sensitive information to zero bits after a calcualtion, but the compiler throws it away. The program is perfectly safe in that it doesn't crash on any bad input or miscalculate on any good input, but doesn't meet a security requirement.

The crux is that what the language standard calls "observable behavior", and behavior that can actually be observed (with security implications) are two different things.
Population being split on the available options is the basis of democracy and is a feature not a bug. Otherwise we might as well just have a CCP style single party.
> there is no evidence that they are doing anything else

There is a lot of evidence they aren't just buying Treasuries. The only times people looked, the money was being held in weird stuff, including frozen deposits at non-FDIC insured banks and private loans [1].

[1] https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/2021.02.17_-_settlemen...
I'm thinking versioning. 9.9, 9.10, 9.11 etc because in my native language we use the comma, for decimal separation 9,11 9,22 9,90
How about advertising anything other than a product or service is illegal? No more campaign ads, period. You want to know more about a candidate? Go research her yourself!
Lol no one i know wants any of the things you mentioned.

Normies hate the AI hypetrain bullshit.
Ah, yes, I can foresee being taken to the drive-thru of HEY SEARCH AI THIS IS THE BEST CAFÉ for some mediocre coffee by the AI autopilot of THIS AUTO'S BATTERIES WERE FOR SURE ETHICALLY SOURCED AND NOT MADE BY WAGE SLAVES before arriving at WE DEFINITELY DO NOT EXPLOIT WORKERS HERE.
A loss leader is working if it's increasing customer traffic. Nobody is going to McD's because they have amazing/cheap/highly-available ice cream.
I've wondered the same thing. I tend to sprinkle my LLM prompts with "please"s, especially with longer prompts, as I feel that "please" might make clearer where the main request to the LLM is. I have no evidence that they actually yield better results, though, and people I share my prompts with might think I'm anthropomorphizing the models.
Boeing Exploring Sale of Its Space Business
> Here's a great YT video on why McDonald's ice cream machines are always broken: https://youtu.be/SrDEtSlqJC4?si=IK1S-Yx9Zq4nEVrr

As habit or policy, can we all agree to get rid of the tracking information in Youtube links?

* https://youtu.be/SrDEtSlqJC4
Don't call me crazy (I am actually), but sometimes I will keep both ChatGPT and Claude open side-by-side and use them to audit each other.

I'll give them the same prompt.

When they respond, re-prompt with: "What are your thoughts on this approach? Pros and cons. Integrate the best ideas from both: [answer from the other model]"

Repeat until total satisfaction or frustration is achieved.
I think prop 8 was previously nullified by Hollingsworth v. Perry?

Not saying it'll never matter, but if OP has a finite amount of focus IMO it's better to spend it on laws that will have an immediate impact over ones that require multiple hypotheticals to come into play
Sounds plausible.

A the start of the photo era, the state of the art for illustrations was for them to be drawn by an artist and then engraved on a wood block, manually, that was then used as a printing plate. There was a period when no method was available to convert photos to printing plates, so from that period you find prints of photos where someone has manually copied it to a wood engraving for publication.
> AI can draft legal documents, write code, author books, and perform any intellectual task at a fraction of the time and cost. In the past, people needed to invest years to become experts, but now, AI provides that expertise instantly.

Author knows not whereof he speaks. In order to use the language fragments extruded by AI without going badly astray, you need good domain knowledge.
Leopard: A Vision Language Model for Text-Rich Multi-Image Tasks
> still make mistakes all the time

Even veteran eaters bite their tongue or lip once in while. That doesn't mean eating is hard.

> No one is claiming

Only about 3 out of 4 Rust advocates.

> That's not the kind of code we're talking about.

We should talk about all code. Code that gets thrown away, rewritten, or improved from prototype to production. It is relevant to productivity. If I'm going to throw away some code to get to the code I want, it will be an extra waste of time if it is difficult to write.
It's not a question of understanding, it's just a matter of habit. The locals just don't develop, or lose, the habit of considering that place. I'm just speaking from what I've personally observed (as well as my own behavior) over the years.
A newspaper that succumbs to fear of reprisal fails completely in its principal duty and becomes little more than a propaganda rag.
i am sad operating systems need to have such calls implemented while most modern (x86_64) architectures have so many features to facilitate safe and sound programming and computing. legacy crap en mentality , and trying to patch old systems built on paradigms not matching the current world and knowledge rather than rebuilding really put a break on progress in computing, and put litterally billions at risk.

not to say these things arent steps in the right direction, but if you let go of current ideals on how operating systems work, and take into account current systems, knowledge about them, and knowledge about what people want from systems, you can envision systems free from the burden and risks put on developers and users today.

yes architecture bugs exist, but software hardly takes advantage of current features truly,so arguing about architectural bugs is a moot point. theres cheaper ways to compromise, and always will be if things are built on shaky foundations
You need to escalate this to the support tier where people are allowed to use their brains. Possibly writing to their legal department would do the trick?
> Atom though unambiguously specifies that the <title> (and other) elements should be treated as plaintext unless specified otherwise with the type attribute.

I haven't looked at the part of the Atom spec you're talking about, but what does "treat as plaintext" mean when a title could be the literal text "</title><script src=..."
> same-sex marriage prop (which I believe is purely symbolic...

Same-sex marriage is currently outlawed by the California constitution as a result of Prop 8 from 2008. That clause is void as a result of the Hollingsworth and Obergefell decisions, but there are multiple members of the Supreme Court who have explicitly said that they would like to overturn Obergefell, so it's a good idea to get ahead of the potential catastrophe by taking the bad law fully off the books, rather than relying on a capricious and extremist court to stick to a rights-defending decision for any amount of time.
its been reality...
My bad! Fixed. Didn't even realize the YT links had tracking info on them!
> Unless you have some insider info, I think you’re oversimplifying why Linux is giving Rust a chance.

Not really. Linus Torvalds has been quite open about this topic, and it has been covered extensively on LWN.

> Also, model checking - at least as you’re portraying it - sounds too good to be true.

> If it was anywhere close to the realm of practicality... we would be hearing its praises being sung by C devs all over.

Like any technology, model checking takes effort to use and learn. But, it does work quite well. Again, you're conflating the popularity of something with its effectiveness, which is a poor argument.
similar to what the crypto people tried with smart contracts. I can unconditionally have a token that says I own a pizza, but it doesn't mean I own a pizza.
Which is ironic since in 2016 everyone on SV was holding back tears of sadness over Trump getting elected. Oh how the turntables.
Historically, Category Theory was developed to formalize and better understand some deep methods used in mathematics. Like much of mathematics, it "automated" some types of reasoning, opening possibilities that did not (practically) exist before. There are some areas today that cannot even be properly understood without thinking in categorical terms.
One of the World's Most Successful Political Parties Is in Trouble in Japan