skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Correct if I'm wrong, but this still doesn't allow us to define the dropdown content and selected content for each option separately?

There are a few different cases worth considering:

# I want to display the option content in the <selectedoption> as is

Great! Use <selectedoption>

# I want to display the option content in the <selectedoption> a little
differently (eg, hide the associated <img> or a different font-weight)

In this case, you're probably best off using a little CSS to style the content of <selectedoption> different, eg hide particular elements.

# I want to display something completely different in the <selectedoption>

<selectedoption> is optional, so one thing you can do here is just… not use it, and instead change the content of your <button> in response to state changes. This requires JavaScript.

If you really want to use <selectedoption> for this, then you could do this:

<option>
<div class="option-content">…</div>
<div class="selectedoption-content">…</div>
</option>

Along with the CSS:

option .selectedoption-content { display: none }
selectedoption .option-content { display: none }
People rebuilding their homes with earth
> Worst case scenario, RISC-V is a nice byte code, much less toxic than any higher level computer language out there.

RISC-V is not byte code though, it was not designed for efficient execution by a software interpreter.

And by what metric would it be less toxic than any higher level computer language out there?
this might be out of the blue, but have you tried music?

i’m 35 and only got into music a couple years ago— not from a sheet music, but from play

i think the same neurological pathways you use to sequence musical tonality is the same as stringing any sequence of thought together.

my hypothesis as to why reading hasn’t helped train thought— the way people write isn’t how they think. it appears words go from their brain to the page, but there’s so much thought that goes into making the flow of their content more like music than their raw brain feed.

good luck!
My NumPy year: Creating a DType for the next generation of scientific computing
Every problem is personal for the person facing it. When one looks at attempts to cure AIDs, and offers a contextual response of "This is a personal problem" or "This is a matter of personal responsibility", the only meaning of that which is legible is that we shouldn't collectively be trying to cure AIDs, that this isn't our business, and low-key, that sufferers deserve it for their behavior.

That was practically the consensus social position forty years ago.

We didn't have an obesity crisis. Now we have an obesity crisis. Did the human race just become less responsible? Or are they enduring a new, situational, societal-level problem that affects many people collectively based on the socioeconomic & cultural conditions they were born into? Conditions that didn't exist 20,000 or 1,000 or even 60 years ago.

This is a longstanding conservative trope that excuses us from dealing with any and all social problems because we don't owe anything to each other. It is a declaration of social atomization.

See also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tp4FGAv2gks
1. You can fork this repository and do whatever you want with it (e.g., self-host). The license is public domain.

2. If you save this page to your disk, everything will still work offline.
I have been using MQTT for years in my IoT courses – it has proven to be a very versatile tool, and it is convenient that it is also supported over web sockets.
I think another way to express the same idea in a less business-like language is: it's nice to be able to come back to your side project after 6 months and be able to quickly make sense of it.

> Some people don't code for the interns but to have fun.

I don't think the person you were replying to necessarily disagrees with you there. But their post was phrased in such a way that seemed like business was the only focus that mattered, yeah.
As an academic, I agree with almost everything you say -- but I wouldn't blame policies in universities. As much as I hate all the bureaucracy, I can't blame it here.

Academics are periodically called upon to pass judgment on other academics. It's an unsavory part of our job, but given that there are fewer jobs, less grant funding, etc. than the number of strong applications, it's a necessary evil.

To the best we can, we try to evaluate their research record directly. But it is maddeningly difficult to evaluate work even slightly out of your field, and so journals serve as a signaling mechanism.

And here I agree again with what you say: we are paying millions to Springer, Elsevier, etc. for the use of their names. ("Ooh, this person published in Inventiones Mathematicae!") Which we we made great.

As much as I despise this system, if you believe that universities can change this, at the level of policy, I am very curious to hear what you propose.
What a kind heart!
A moon base with regular travel might make maintenance on the dark side of the moon possible.
> It's why MIT ended their Elsevier contract, and why many other R1s are following suit.

I think focusing on Elsevier is/was a mistake. All the publishers are running the exact same racket. Even non-profits like IEEE. It's a disgrace.
Every KeePass-based solution I've tried was far from ready for normal users. Because they need browser integration out of the box, and it has to be smooth. Even BitWarden is still too difficult to use.
Arkansas seems to have a bit of everything ! I was amazed as the diverse geography in AK
Not much to add, other than the fact I’m reading your comment at Bran Castle :)
Well stuff started on what seems like the inside, maybe space rips and everything floats to the shell?
Is this some AI generated bullshit?
"The new Mercedes-Benz battery recycling plant has an annual capacity of 2,500 tonnes. The recovered materials feed into the production of more than 50,000 battery modules for new all-electric Mercedes-Benz models. So it’s a modest start, but Mercedes plans to scale up production volumes and expand recycling capacities."

A modest start? If that corresponds to 50k new battery modules then wouldn't that also be approximately the same number of five- or ten-year old modules? That should be a sizable share of what Mercedes-Benz sold at the time.
I applaud calling the language Mathematica, despite Stephen Mathematica's attempts to rename it a couple of years ago.

See also: https://mathics.org/

It's a more mature and complete reimplementation of Mathematica, though still miles behind the original.
I'm not American and a bit bemused by the US border but I note that when last year Texas put razor wire on the border to stop people crossing there was outrage from the federal government who sent people to cut it. The issue seems to be politics and policy as to whether you want people crossing or not rather than tech.

I was also surprised to see on 60 Minutes coach loads of middle class Chinese crossing the Mex/US border who'd bought some fly to the border and claim asylum in the US package. Immigration can be an odd business.
Literally decades of missile / guided bomb development placing warheads within cms of their target.
> But what if those just aren’t interesting to someone?

That doesn't matter. A student is unable to evaluate the value of unknown subjects and the synergy between subjects. People are often unmotivated to do important things, because we are just lazy s**.

> I wonder how many geniuses we skip on because doing the chores of homework and getting through boring classes is busywork and memorization for the sake of getting an A.

And how many lunatics making wrong decisions did we prevented by forcing them to learn necessary things?

> Meanwhile, hardly anyone actually remembers anything about those topics

They are engraved in your mind. Even when you don't remember every little detail, they still helped you in forming your understanding of the world.
Someone tell me I'm wrong and why, but this whole thing seems like unnecessary complication? We have JavaScript for bespoke select tags.
D. J. Bernstein
So independent that they parrot the ideology of the ruling parties. If you want to pay for them then be my guest but I'd rather not.
Is this some AI generated rubbish or actual code that works? If this is code that works, does setting a primary password protect against this decryptor?
exactly, technology changes our social life. many things that used to only be possible when people were at the same location, are now possible over the distance. this not only affects how we interact but also who we interact with. in the past i could only have friends where i lived. now i have friends all over the world. why should the communication with those distant friends be any less private than the communication with my friends at home?
In terms of not being able to read, I would count 8% as "many"? Select a group of ten random Americans and you'd expect one of them to be illiterate - that's appalling.
we're literally nothing compared to it

Yet, here we are, made of it.
"Triple AES" sounds as something insecure if it is similar to triple DES. (Insecure in the sense of providing a small additional strength obtained with a big increase in the time and energy needed for encryption/decryption.)

Only amateurs would choose to implement a "Triple AES", so it is very likely that they will also write a buggy implementation. Triple DES has not been used because it was a good strengthening method, but only because it could be used with unmodified hardware modules designed for simple DES. When a cipher strengthening is done in software, there are much better methods.

The best way to strengthen AES above the standard AES-256 is to double the block length from 128 bits to 256 bits. Increasing the key length over 256 bits is much less useful, because the key length is not the weakest point of AES-256. A 256-bit key is strong enough even against quantum computers, but short 128-bit blocks can be a vulnerability in certain applications. The key schedule algorithm of AES, which converts the cipher key into a set of round keys, is mediocre, so the length of the cipher key is the least important concern about the strength of AES.

The original Rijndael proposal had a stronger variant with 256-bit blocks, which has not been retained in the standard. Nevertheless, it is easy to implement it with the Intel/AMD AES instructions or with the Arm Aarch64 AES instructions. Intel has even published an application note describing how to do this, when the AES instructions have been introduced in the Westmere CPUs.

After increasing the block length, increasing the number of rounds can provide additional strengthening. Another choice would be to replace the standard key schedule algorithm with a stronger non-standard algorithm (i.e. one providing more random round keys). Increasing the key over 256 bits provides a much less useful strengthening in comparison with the cost required for executing the additional necessary operations.
Peer reviewing could be made easier by public key cryptography. You could establish a web of trust between reviewers.
Sounds like a potential mess..

Is there any way to distribute a binary that uses "core" and then have users recompile the binary to use their local extensions?
A self-hostend STUN/TURN server maybe? I don't know but I'm def not installing a VPN for this. Considering I might have another one already running. The issues that would arise from this are numerous.
sclera was mostly something that was floating around my skull and leaked over into this potential well; I think in the meantime I've got a just so story: cats, dogs, and horses can use their ears to indicate if they're paying attention to something to the side, but our ears are immobile, and so we have large sclera to make side glances more obvious?

"either take your cross off or cover your denta"?

(wonder how much the Kali casting inspired that of Natural Born Killers the following year?)

[I'd been counting the strings as handles, thanks for the clarification!]
I think Lucid was one of the drivers for really performant Lisp on stock hardware? And CMUCL.

There's room for even more improvement.
https://gren-lang.org

I've gotten feedback that the landing page should have code examples. Will probably add that when preparing the next release (due in December).
Almost everyone needs hearing aids. It's just a matter of when.
Lowdee huh
[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41909463
“There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable."
How do we know you aren't just a Cloudflare employee looking to drum up new business? ;-)
Maybe someone should fork Firefox and make it hackable again. Probably not even that hard. Fix the keybindings, add some first-class-support for userscripting, local extensions and interaction with local system.. All those forks are just focused on adding more privacy or new addons at the moment.
I see no need for that. There are no problems with verifiying identities of reviewers.
Try listening to death metal, the difference is obvious.
Anyone know why the parent comment would be downvoted?

I know nothing about OCR, so maybe it's obvious to others.
By all means, feel free to design your own ISA to fit every use case from the get-go, publish it in its final state, port toolchains and relevant software, and convince the world to use it.

RISC-V chose a different approach, because this one, quite frankly, would not have worked.
ConnectGenia AI is your personal branding AI Assistant for Linkedin But quite DIFFERENT!!

Different how?

Content written by AI based LinkedIn tools out there:

- Have a ChatGPTish vibe.
- Use AI-typical phrases, projecting lack of personalisation.

Instead of benefiting, these tools negatively impact your LinkedIn Brand.

With ConnectGenie you define your unique persona and train AI to adopt your personality.

Our AI then creates content keeping under consideration your:
- Personality traits.
- Writing style.
- Conversational voice.
- And of course professional background.

The result?

The produced content feels like it's actually been written by you.

ConnectGenie AI’s prominent offerings?

Persona-centric LinkedIn posts with intriguing Hooks creating virality.
Thought provoking comments in your unique conversational voice to increase profile followers / views.
Build a network of meaningful relationships with personalised connection request notes.
Highlight relevant LinkedIn posts to:
- Discover niche specific leads right within your feed.
- Focus engagement efforts where they truly belong.
- Consume content effectively.
Score high paying jobs with customised job cover letters.
Multi-language supported content for global audience.

Hope you like what we've created. Feel free to ask any questions. Your support & feedback would be greatly appreciated.

See you in the comments shortly.
I think you have very little experience teaching.
That's why you have an internal domain that's not related to the company. Something like "packet-flinging.ninja". Everything's a tradeoff though.
Really the primary practical use case for the Cybertruck right now is generating YouTube and TikTok content.
As it climate change gets worse, we will want more carbon munching things.
Windows Terminal. VS Code. You clearly are a troll.
For context this is indeed a breaking change but a change that brings Chromium in line with the URL spec and other engines. If your URLs are suddenly broken, it means they were invalid the whole time and functioned in Chromium due to bugs in their URL parser.

From the linked issue, the URL "customprotocol://https://example.com/test" starts with // after the scheme so it gets parsed as URL protocol=customprotocol: hostname=https port=<empty> pathname=//example.com/test. When you click the link, the browser will open "customprotocol://https//example.com/test" without the colon after "https" because an empty port is omitted (try opening https://example.com: in your browser).

Another example from the thread is "windx://host:scs/<port>;secure/MIS_VL_WINDX/v1/<sid>". This is invalid because it gets parsed as protocol=windx: host=host port=scs. "scs" is not a valid port number.

What if you want the previous behavior? Make sure the part after scheme doesn't start with //. In that case, the string will not be parsed as URL at all and just passed along.

1. customprotocol:https://example.com/test (protocol=customprotocol: hostname=<empty> pathname=https://example.com/test

2. windx:host:scs/<port>;secure/MIS_VL_WINDX/v1/<sid> (protocol=windx: hostname=<empty> pathname=host:scs/<port>;secure/MIS_VL_WINDX/v1/<sid>
You could publish a key as each of these personas and then, when reestablishing a contact using a new persona, prove your identity to that one contact by using the private key of the old (known) persona.

Am I missing something?
> The first math course as math major in university involved proving that a+b=b+a and that a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c.

Really? What were the axioms?
TL;DR: she thought kids would like grown-up stuff but was wrong.

"Giving my kids unadulterated fun allowed me to relax, at least as much as I could as a mom of three young ones.

I'm not the type of parent who wants to spend all my time off at an indoor water park with dozens of other screaming families, but I'm learning that we need to have age-appropriate fun. And that looks different from what I'd imagined (or what I saw on social media)."
Elsevier are the biggest and most aggressive in driving up prices.

But you’re right the others aren’t far behind.
Webhook to Fedora Messaging
In Chrome you can F12 and go to "Network" tab and then refresh the page. Choose the first file in the list (that's the HTML itself) and you will find "Response Headers" in the "Headers" panel, which includes Last-Modified. It's a bit deep, which makes sense as it's rarely useful.
Oh god more “boo hoo I’m a victim” substack articles..
If you're looking at it simply from a resource standpoint, we should ask what those humans would be doing otherwise.

I'm assuming that powering them down isn't a viable option, unlike with GPUs in a datacenter.
That’s irrelevant to 99.99% of people. An A in math is not especially difficult to achieve.

To actually be meaningfully better at math you need to go far, far further than the coursework presented in schools, at which point it becomes an extra curricular which is already considered. If you’re a math savant proving novel theorems, they will notice that.

But nobody gives a shit if you’re just really, really good at factoring polynomials from Algebra 2 tests.
Thankfully there are a few amazing Diamond/Platinum open access journals popping up (that are often ‘arXiv overlay’, meaning they simply provide peer review services to arXiv-hosted papers). These journals are free to publish and free to read but still provide the useful categorisation/review/cataloguing services of traditional publications. Notably this includes a post-review DOI.

Relevant for the HN crowd is the Journal of Open Source Software: joss.theoj.org.

[I am an editor at JOSS]
Have any examples of public servers?
Gather together and begin publishing your own journals (even just in the form of a website)?

If it's you who made the existing journals great, you probably can do it again?
It's like bringing a Goth to a Vamp fight.

(Southpark homage)
In the same way a single second occurs.
It's called reverie. The stream of thinking that you naturally have when you're not deliberately trying to focus.

Essentially, one thought leading to another which leads to another and so on, without you having to make any effort.

Most people identify so much with their thinking, they aren't aware of it as a "thing"; it feels like it's something you're doing.

What are you thinking about?

But if you try to just pay attention, say to your breath, going in and out, after a few seconds you'll discover you slipped back into thinking, as described above, back into reverie.

Continued failure, despite your increasing resolve, to stay just listening to your breath reveals this fact: you can't stop "your" thinking mind from recapturing your attention.

So it seems like a monkey, that is, a thing which jumps around, from thought to thought, a separate entity from you, one which will not obey you.
Wow that’s an interesting claim! I believe you, but do you have a link where I can read more?
http://archive.today/qU6Os
After seeing launches, SpaceX's rocket catch was a new thrill
reasonably certain this doesn't encrypt your cookies

which are in some cases better than your passwords (already passed 2FA, etc)
what is this 2002? Being immediately assailed by sound when clicking a link is not a pleasant experience.
What do you mean “as always”… That sounds like ai generated nonsense.

This is where ai currently falls down. It can’t do new analysis.
It's transpilers all the way down...
It’s easy to fake if you are part of YC. You think they would lose 1B+ potential revenue if the only thing they have to do is to change one database record that nobody except them is monitoring ?
This is exactly correct.

With graded readers, thou, you can have good reading experiences with around 3k words (ofc depending on language, book, etc).
It could enable to have a decentralised web of trust of reviewers. In the same vein it is used to verify identities, you can use it to assess the reliability of a reviewer. A reviewer could sign another reviewer's key with the confidence it has about their reviewing.
By signing up through Apple you are guaranteed to have an easy way to cancel. With many subscription services it is very difficult to cancel. Sometimes a service you can sign up for using Apple is easy to cancel even if you sign up outside of Apple. But why take the risk if you can sign up through Apple?

Sign up for SiriusXM and then try to cancel.
HiveMQ has a public one: https://broker.hivemq.com/
If you compare it to the only other board in the table with more than 300 MHz (and the only RISC-V) you can see that Teensy outperforms it by a margin even when the results are scaled by clock speed.

Of course it would only be a complete picture taking power consumption into consideration.
I only know this one

https://www.mqtt-dashboard.com/

But a quick Google search will get you some others.
discussed at length very recently

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41883419
> internet really doesn't care about being completely peer-to-peer.

I think this is mostly the way it is because of all the NAT headaches that come with IPv4.

We regularly see the limitations of Dropbox/Google drive when we just want to share that large birthday video with our friends/family. Imagine them having a secure link to your device that you can revoke any time.

Same with all the home automation / iot devices / cctv cameras that have no excuse not to be local first/need you to install an ad infested app.
port 70, magical.fish
https://rmi.org/insight/the-battery-mineral-loop

I originally learned about it from the interview with a battery recycling expert mentioned here:

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mliebreich_as-i-have-been-poi...
For your use case(s), try https://clay.earth/
About 15 years ago, Andy Stanford Clark's house became something of a news item, in the days before tweeting IoT devices were a thing:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2009/06/things_that_t...

The core protocol, devised in the days when 1 byte over a satellite link cost $1, is incredibly efficient and simple to implement.
Wrust? (O_3), more properly tungstic
You can distribute a binary that uses "core", and then also uses extensions at runtime if they are available.

That's completely fine and standard. It's already what people do with x86 too, if you want to ship say AVX-512 code you have to deal with the fact that the latest Intel client CPUs don't yet have support (product segmentation issues), so at runtime you have to check if the extension is supported.

The situation is not different with RISC-V. You compile your binary for the standard profile, and optionally if you want to use a specialized extension to optimize some hot loop, you check at runtime if it's available.