skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
True, hardware requirements tend to increase, but what says we arent reqching another plateau already, especially with the newest consoles only recently being released, not to mention how these data centers tend to run the latest GPU'S, so depending on when the bubble bursts(Im guessing aroudn 2026, 2027 or later due to the current USA election, where most of these data centers are located), it wouldnt be off to say that a cutting edge RTX9999 gpu from 2026 can run a 2032 game on medium or maybe hugh settings quite well.

Im more than happy to play 2010 to 2015 ganes right now at low settings, it would be even better to play games that are 5 years away rather than 10.

The same can be said for rendering, professional work, and server making, something is better than nothing, and most computers here dont even have a seperate gpu and opt for integrated graphics.
Everything I built with Claude Artifacts this week
> fixing your diet

What the fuck do you guys think GLP-1 inhibitors do? Why even bother posting if you don't understand the most surface level of what I'm saying.

> drinking habits

GLP-1 inhibitors have also been shown to reduce drinking and smoking. It's essentially an anti-addiction drug.

It's very easy to sit on a throne when you don't have a food addiction. For those who do, it's not as simple as "durrr eat better". Come on guys we have to start putting that meat sack between our ears to use.

We've been trying, and ONLY been trying, the "discipline" approach for the entirety of the obesity epidemic. And it is not working. Point blank, this is not an effective method of treating obesity or diabetes.

If that's your suggestion, it's obvious you don't actually know what's going on. Which is fine, but then perhaps silence would do you some good. Less embarrassment that way.
So that's what it takes to run a sub 3hr marathon... Basically eight 20 minute 5Ks, back to back!
Dataframes from Multimodal Logs
I claim "concept" isn't even a cogent concept.

In fact I claim "cogent" isn't even a cogent concept

How about "claim"?

See how these definitional arguments become un-useful and boring?
p.19 "The Pepsi Ratio is aesthetic geometry"

p.26 "Creation of Identity: Gravitational Pull"

p.27 "x=1 light year Pepsi Planet", "x=2 light year Pepsi Galaxy", "x=8 light year Pepsi Universe" and the accompanying diagrams

Wow.
Waking up science's sleeping beauties (2023)
I disagree. A scientist could read a single paper and find out n is small, or identify a flaw.

But there are loads of papers like this.
Then you have some literature studies which look at all these papers together and get result aggregates.

Then you get some “proper” studies which link to these aggregates, and several small studies, and you’re going to read these “proper” studies which are quoted often and deemed decent or good quality.

And at no point will you realise it’s all based on shoddy foundations.

This is for example what recently happened in social psychology
Can you make one of the playback speeds 1.25x (it jumps from 1.0x to 1.5x)?
Do you have a prediction for how these trends might change in 2025?
Regarding software, one thing I've noticed looking at YC and Product Hunt these days is that pretty much all the software being hyped now is "AI Powered...something".

I find it quite annoying because for every company that is doing something where AI would actually be useful, there are 10 that are shoving it into their existing app in some capacity to make their software "AI Powered". A perfect example of this is my company recently evaluated Zenhub. Their sales team was very eager to point out that their app was using AI though when we actually looked, all it did was generate story descriptions from a prompt, the most basic of AI integrations.

AI is very useful but my god not everything needs to have it baked in.
>raising rate would bring the economy to a slower pace and reduce private sector consumer demand.

Tech companies decided to respond with lower consumer demand by using price hikes, though. And of course letting go of labor, adding to the issue.

These kinds of companies aren't the ones being slowed by increased rates. They can just whether the storm and drain blood out of the rocks they have left on board.

>Private sector investment can continue to increase but at some point that too will hit a brick wall

At this point I'm betting the economy hits an objective recession before that brick wall happens. But I suppose we'll see.
Given that some of the "evidence" is decades old do we know if his views on consent remain the same to this day?
Neat!

I once made a simple version of this concept that saves an epub file on the server‘s file system, which is then synced to my e-book reader:

https://github.com/solarkraft/webpub

The main ingredient is Postlight Parser, which gives a simplified „document“ view for a website.
Show HN: Zendo – Prioritise your to-do list with the free Eisenhower Matrix App
Prioritise your to-do list with the free online Eisenhower Matrix App, and break urgent and important tasks down. Get templates for task management.

Added a feature to generate AI suggestions of what task to prioritize
isnt the easiest solution to this just to make homework optional? Put all the weight into in class written exams and just have more of them.
>Azure Blob storage is considerably cheaper than S3 or Google, for example

Really? I did a quick search and azure charges 2.08 cents per GB for "hot" storage compared to 2.3 cents for aws. That's not that big of a difference. Am I missing something?
That doesn’t seem like a good comparison: it’s a far more serious crime, and while the bank won’t tell that they’re reporting your activity to the authorities the legal process absolutely will and in sensible countries you’re required to be given the opportunity to challenge the evidence.

The problem being discussed here feels like it should be similar in that last regard: any time an automated system is making a serious decision they should be required to have an explanation and review process. If they don’t have sufficient evidence to back up the claim, they need to collect that evidence before making further accusations.
Israel Jacob Klinger quite famously rid Palestine (mandate) of malaria.

In the Galilee and around Lake Kinnereth (Sea of Galilee), malaria had decimated the Jewish settlements, with the incidence rate at 95%+ of the workers in 1919.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaria_in_Mandatory_Palestine
Tried it out. Looks smooth.
Any way to revert back?
You use "control" in the wide sense of "dependency", i.e. if two quantities are constrained by an equation, you say that one quantity controls the other, only because their values are not independent (which means that fixing the value of anyone of the two quantities also determines the value of the other quantity).

According to your usage, the voltage on a resistor is controlled by its current, because the voltage is proportional with the current (by the resistance of the resistor), and also the current is controlled by the voltage, because the current is proportional with the voltage (by the conductance of the resistor), exactly like in a transformer the input and output currents and voltages are bound by proportionality relationships.

It is true that this meaning of "control" is encountered in speech, but in engineering and physics "control" has a precise meaning, more restricted that how you use it.

In the engineering use of "control", it is always possible to distinguish which is the controller and which is the controlled in a control relationship.

When "control" is used like you use it, the "control" relationship is bidirectional and you cannot say which is the controller and which is the controlled, e.g. between the primary loop and the secondary loop of the transformer, or between the current and the voltage through a resistor.

For "control" in the engineering sense, unidirectionality is an essential property. Real control devices have some internal feedbacks that make them not completely unidirectional, but this is considered a defect and serious efforts are done to improve the unidirectionality of the control devices. A device with total feedback like a transformer cannot be used to implement any of the known control methods, i.e. you cannot make amplifiers or oscillators or logic gates with it.
Same for the most part. Our TAMs have been great to work with and so have a number of engineers the handful of times we needed it. We've had moments of some back-and-forth at times, but overall I've been satisfied.
That is fundamentally the problem, no one wants to donate storage to host stuff they're not interested in.
That clears it up!
You seem to be focusing on the most obtuse possible way of structuring descriptive test names for rhetorical purposes. I don't know if that's intentional or not, but either way it's not terribly convincing? If you name tests according to business domain concepts rather than tying it to individual parameters through some formulaic rubric, it's often possible to come up with test names that are both more concise and easier to understand than the specific way of naming tests that you've been consistently steering the conversation back toward throughout this thread.
Almost 0 chance.
i feel like this comment was maybe supposed to be posted under this article?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41896973
Segfaults are the easy bugs! You get a handy stack trace right where the problem is, all the variables intact, it's great! It's the ones where you mess up a data structure, or overwrite an array that kill you, with the symptom occurring long after the problem was caused. Much like React, in fact, where problems in React usage don't get reported until the event loop, long after your function creating your component has finished executing. So maybe those developers will be right at home after all.
Works on this site: https://docs.ray.io/en/latest/ for me.
Would you consider that good?

I grew up with the Internet and people sharing shock horror sites with some very questionable content. It seems we all mostly still grew up fine.
I did stats and applied research so I basically got to read papers as my full time job, then go home and read papers as a hobby.

Most fields are really bad at stats which is one thing that is pervasive across just about all science. More than half of science wouldn’t exist without some sort of fraud, clear selection bias, or p-hacking.

It’s to the point that one sure way to lose friends and be shunned in academia is to be good at statistics.

It’s like the plagiarism scandal, academics have been getting away with it for so long it’s become normalized. It used to be that plagiarism would be the absolute end of any academic career. Now some academics are arguing for an amnesty on the basis that everyone did it and others are ignoring it.

Edit: I should point out like the other commenter that a lot of the fraudulent data is laughably blatant. Like pulled ‘random’ numbers straight from their head, not even using any type of random number generator. Or pulling random numbers from wrong distribution. Or not using realistic noise etc.
And sometimes the opportunity window for studying a thing is just closed forever. Unique events are unique. That strange meteorite will not return until 300 years, or the species used in the experiment split in two, making impossible to duplicate it.
> I don’t think that JavaScript is inherently slow

It is.

Brilliant engineers have spent decades making it faster than you might expect, subject to many caveats, and after the JIT has had plenty of time to warm up, and if you're careful to write your code in such a way that it doesn't fall off the JITs optimization paths, etc.

Meanwhile, any typical statically typed language with a rudimentary ahead of time compiler will generally be faster than a JS VM will ever approach. And you don't have to wait for the JIT to warm up.

There are a lot of good things about dynamically typed languages, but if you're writing a large program that must startup quickly and where performance is critical, I think the right answer is a sound typed language.
conveniently zip recruiter's data is proprietary

again, believe who you want... but it's a little funny to blindly believe a company incentivized to lie to you more than any other random anecdote

we're on equal footing in terms of evidence (I can build a fake chart based on my own data if you'd be more likely to believe that) and I have less of a financial incentive to lie to you
> As I sit just under two weeks out from the race, I can’t help but think I haven’t done enough. I didn’t make enough sacrifices, I wasn’t disciplined enough in my training plan, I — the list goes on.

Why do you have to sacrifice anything? The greats are great because they enjoy the activity and would probably be doing it if no one was around or cared that they were. Do it for the fun, not the glory
Why are you lying?
It’s not. Their security has known massive issues and security holes, and they consciously do not fix them.

Look at the CVEs for azure, msal and Active Directory for some good laughs.

Now realise most governments, large companies and education works on this
While not a complete satire in tone, Starship Troopers was very much a "bildungsroman" showing a child growing up in that society and getting lectured about it and growing up (and growing more cynical as childhood naivety wanes). The book is extremely didactic and written "this is the way society should/must be", but that doesn't mean they were the actual didactic thoughts of the author (especially as the protagonist does start to question them late in the book, despite being a proponent of it all in youth). As much as anything the book seems to me a "gedankenexperiment" (thought experiment) meant to ask hard questions of an extreme take on a possibly good idea. The possibly good idea wasn't intended to build a militarized society, but the fact that it led to an awfully militarized one, seems to me to be an intentional contradiction in the narrative that Heinlein asks of the reader, in the way of a satire/farce (even if not actually satire/farce) to question the extremes of the thought experiment, to question the didactic lectures for their problems and failed assumptions.
yes, the article has nothing about what they were doing or how they "interfered" exactly.
cooked carrot = processed

oreo = ultra processed

a raw carrot and a cooked carrot have different nutritional profiles.
> ... satellite maker Boeing to address an anomaly that emerged earlier that day, but “believe it is unlikely that the satellite will be recoverable.”

Yeah, the satellite disintegrates and they call it an "anomaly" and "unlikely that the satellite will be recoverable". This response is even funnier than "the front fell off" sketch.

I feel like it's time to class Boeing as not only inept but a dangerously inept organisation.
I remember seeing a video from the 80s about how the behavior is emergent - they made a computer program that replicated how birds fly by stating just a few axioms like don't fall behind and don't be in front.

The idea being that the V takes shape because they want to have a bird in front of them the entire time while one poor bird gets stuck out in front.
Algebra is taught in public schools. The majority of children are able to get through the classes: do the homework and pass the tests. Not sure where you're getting your statistics.

Not everyone likes it, or ends up going into a field that requires math, but that's not the same thing as having no ability to understand it.

Why most people only understand enough about Lisp to make jokes about all the parens is like asking why some people only understand enough about Poland to tell jokes, like four Polaks turning a ladder so a fifth one can change a light bulb.
Mini-Omni2: Towards Open-Source GPT-4o with Vision, Speech, Duplex Capabilities
Totally agree. I'm a little embarrassed by it tbh; to me it feels like a big failure of nerd governance. We should be able to manage this, but I think we're pretty close to having to admit that we can't.
Brave perhaps.

But even they are going to support MV2 only as long its code remains in Chromium repo, I think.
The problem is the idea that no amount of physical information can capture or encode qualia. I think this puts qualia into a different category than other kinds of perception.
> Claims to be "safe" but allows arbitrary unsafe code, and it's everywhere.

Sigh. This is not true. Not the first part, and especially not the last part.
`Unsafe` doesn't allow arbitrary, unsafe code. It resets the compiler to a level where most manually managed languages are all the time. You still have to uphold all guarantees the compiler provides, just manually. That's why Miri exists.
It was emulated using horrible macros: https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/blob/8f5e07656e25ec64ec7c843f0.... IIRC some early versions of `std::tuple` did something similar.
And that's how you get preppers: it's a remote problem until it's too late, let's prepare for every eventuality before it's suddenly too late!

Risk management is a balance, not fearmongering as you say. That's why I'd rather use advice from people with daily experience than look at the newsworthy experiences ("nothing happened today, again; regular security patches working fine" you'll never see) and conclude you'd attract threats and cyber attacks just by hosting backup copies of parts of the Internet Archive
But why use JavaScript at all if you can just compile it all to WebAssembly?
(not the CP, but went to a university with a tutorial-style system)

I think the hard answer is that to some extent you just have to learn to. I mean, you could sit silently in supervisions if you really insisted, but to participate properly you just needed to build the confidence.

Is it fun? No, but it's a pretty accurate reflection of life after school: nobody in the real world gives you points for "couldn't say the right thing at the right time, but was thinking it"
Glad you like it =)
"Oh that's a cool bird in that tree. Dang, they have an odd gait. Would my shoes have been 20% off at that other place? Oh I forgot to get shampoo at the store today."

"Oh wow, the race is done. Fancy that"
Show HN: Llama Workspace – An Open Source ChatGPT Teams Alternative
Hey HN! We are happy to share with you our latest project: Llama Workspace (https://llamaworkspace.ai).

It's an open-source ChatGPT Teams alternative made with the needs of businesses and organizations in mind.

It has everything you can expect from ChatGPT, plus first class support for users and roles management, as well as advanced collaboration features. We've made it very easy to self-host anywhere you like, and we also provide a cloud version. So no excuse for trying it out!

Why using Llama Workspace instead of ChatGPT Teams?

- You have access to all the major Large Language models in one place, including GPT-4, Claude Sonnet or Gemini.
- It brings savings of about 70% - 85% when compared to ChatGPT Teams (see website for more info on this).
- You can integrate it with your own code, like AI agents, and provide a single platform to access AI.

Here's the Github link: https://github.com/llamaworkspace/llamaworkspace

I would love to hear your ideas, experience, and feedback about the product! What should we implement next?
While I agree with the sentiment, I doubt any of the greats would say their achievements hadn't required _some_ sacrifices
Sending Web Push Notifications from Rails
> Never go full-Object-oriented programming.

Agreed, but that wasn't what I was saying or replying to, was it?

I was arguing that method implementation tied to an instance isn't the type of thing people mean when they refer to tight coupling. Coupling is related to breakage/maintenance; when you touch this thing here, if it's tightly coupled with some other component, it will also require (sometimes unexpected) changes in that other component.

Whether one should or shouldn't go full OO is an orthogonal consideration.
This is really interesting! I remember gopher from back in the day- I didn't know it still existed even as a protocol.

Wouldn't that be an interesting development, for web browsing shifting to a "have-to" paradigm (for work, for other utilitatarian purposes) from a "want-to" paradigm. Would spam dry up if the web were no longer populated by the masses merely whiling away idle time?
Yes, I think that's it. There is a lot of horrible C++ code out there, especially on StackOverflow where "this compiled for me" sometimes ends up being the accepted answer. There are also a lot of ways to use C++ poorly/wrong without even knowing it.
They don't mention "CDC" (Change Data Capture) directly anywhere, but I think that's what Drasi is? (they call it "Data Change Processing platform").

"Debezium", an alternative CDC system, is mentioned in the documentation and sources [1]. I'm not sure if Drasi uses Debezium, or aims to be compatible with it. Maybe someone here can shine more light on the relationship between these two?

--

1: https://github.com/drasi-project/drasi-platform/tree/main/re...
Hmmm... only the things that are really in our control. For example, I think adding time-on-lesson as another metric for the difficulty calculation will make certain courses and projects jump up quite a bit.

I also think that prompt versioning will give us some interesting stuff to look at next year - and of course encouraging more up/down votes on the AI assistant

I guess I will say that if Boot dev keeps growing at this rate, I expect vim mode usage to go down a bit, just because I'd expect the growth to come more from beginners than what we've had in the past
I think we are speaking past each other here. I'm talking in consequentialist terms and you are (I think, feel free to correct me if I am wrong) talking in virtue ethics terms.

I'm assuming you aren't familiar with these terms and so am defining them. Forgive me if you already were familiar.

Consequentialists think that the purpose of morality is to prevent "bad" consequences from happening. From a consequentialist perspective, one can very much argue about what makes a consequence "bad", and it makes a lot of sense to do so if we are trying to improve the human condition. Furthermore, I think consequentialists tend to care more about making their systems consistent, mainly so they are fair. As a side effect though, no principles have to be sacrificed when making a concrete decision, since none of them conflict. (That's what it means for a system to be consistent)

Virtue ethicists think that the purpose of morality is to be a "good" person. I think you are correct that it's pretty hard to define what a "good" person is. There are also many different types of "good" people. Even if you had such a person with consistent principles, if you try and stuff everyones "good" principles into them, they would become inconsistent. It's hard for me to tell exactly what the point of being "good" is supposed to be if it is not connected to the consequences of one's actions, in which case one would just be a consequentialist, However, if the point was to improve the human condition, then I think it would take a lot of different types of "good" people, so it doesn't try and make sense to argue our way into choosing one of them.

This isn't really an argument for a position as much as me trying to figure out where we disagree. Does that all sound correct to you?
I like overloading most of the time but prefer specialized syntax for the various conditional idioms. Encapsulating it all in one keyword makes "if" harder to parse.
How does a satellite break up in orbit? Was it struck by something?
First answer in Google says that cooked carrots and baked potatoes are processed. But I'm supposed to take your definition over what is available elsewhere? In addition frozen broccoli is processed. This is coming from Harvard Health Publishing and UCLA Health. Are they all insane?