skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
All the snark contained within aside, I'm reminded of that ranting blog post from the person sick of AI that made the rounds a little ways back, which had one huge, cogent point within: that the same companies that can barely manage to ship and maintain their current software are not magically going to overcome that organizational problem set by virtue of using LLMs. Once they add that in, then they're just going to have late-released, poorly made software that happens to have an LLM in it somewhere.
> The historical progression from text to still images to audio to moving images will hold true for AI as well.

You'll have to explain what you mean by this. Direct speech, text, illustrations, photos, abstract sounds, music, recordings, videos, circuits, programs, cells... these are all just different mediums with different characteristics. There is no "progression" apparent among them. Why should there be? They each fulfill different ends and have different occasions for which they best suit.

We seem to have discovered a new family of tools that help lossilly transform content or intent from one of these mediums to some others, which is sure to be useful in its own ways. But it's not a medium like the above in the first place, and with none of them representing a progression, it certainly doesn't either.
The CTA (in Chicago) has a nice customizable “next train screen” web app that’s perfect for this:

https://www.transitchicago.com/developers/diydisplay/
Right. The closest thing I'm familiar with is the dynamic context used in Serilog[1], where you add log properties to the current scope, which gets added to each log line generated in that scope, and removed once the scope exits.

Of course, no compile-time checking there, so the combination sounds indeed quite useful.

https://github.com/serilog/serilog/wiki/Enrichment#the-logco...
Lilly is probably in an even stronger position if retatrutide continues to look as good as it has in the current trials. Better weight loss than tirzepatide, and recent results have shown it has excellent results on reducing fat deposits in the liver... and NAFLD is the leading cause of severe liver disease in the world.
I really really really wish my records were kept tight, offline, air gapped, or otherwise not stored on a cloud system with Trust Me Bro™ HIPAA-compliant security.

(The Trust Me Bro™ security aspect is the "It's secure because people will go to jail" and "We so totes won't use this easily subpoenaed data against you" security, when it would be best if the data stayed on a RAID in my doctor's office and an offsite VPN-linked backup instead. This goes 20x for psychs.)
Lingo: A Go micro language framework for building Domain Specific Languages
Agreed. That's why promoting ham skills and events it is important: Learn it before you need it! Cheers.
Israel launched a dozen attacks on UN troops in Lebanon, says leaked report
It is embarrassing (for Microsoft) how much better Rider is for C# than Visual Studio.
I think electric cars need to be simpler. They should be more like economy cars of today with the drivetrain simply swapped. No touchscreens, no fancy door handles, no cameras, etc. Those features should be optional with some trims. They need to be reliable and long life to maximize raw material efficiency. Imagine the Chinese electric cars are similar to this but the article is lacking much detail.

I also think it would make a lot more sense to have an auxiliary diesel heating system. This would be much more effective than electric heating and likely generate less carbon emissions (at least until we transition to carbon neutral energy infrastructure). A gallon of diesel would last for months if it was just used for heating the cabin, and it would improve the range. It might even be an effective solution for keeping the battery at optimal temperatures but obviously a lot of math is required here to see if the tradeoff is worth it vs integrated battery heating.
Sorry, I meant buying puts. I mostly sell puts on other things, but on TSLA I buy puts.
On the instruction-provision end, sure.
"The proper way?"

Where is your research published I'm curious about this approach.
$600 Buzz Lightyear Robot Packs 3k Parts and Advanced Micro-Servos
> It is not uncommon to have bugs on certain Android brands, with the community on github reporting the bug but waiting months for it to be fixed.

Welcome to Android. That's not just a React Native issue

https://github.com/M66B/FairEmail/blob/master/app/src/main/j...
Brush – A new compatible Gaussian splatting engine
We've been prescribing semaglutide since 2017 and the predecessor since 2010.
Are you going to sell the thing you're using Rider to build? That's commercial use.

If you're not going to sell it, it's probably not commercial use.
This is looking better! L49 is giving me a little anxiety though, I'd really love to see some kind of justification for that decision. Compare e.g. to Lemire's[1].

EDIT: To be clear, I do understand that I'm making an unreasonable demand. I know the process that came up with this program has no ability to justify this or that "decision" (deliberately scare quoted because it doesn't actually have agency and can't decide at all). And that's the problem. That's why I find it very difficult to trust it.

[1] https://github.com/lemire/FastPFor/blob/52e45deeab9c3a481daa...
Nah - I own a Volvo XC60 that was built in China and it's about 10x better in terms of build quality than my last Mercedes that was entirely built in Germany and creaked like an old horse cart, I was in the dealership probably once a month fixing various issues with the interior. I've owned the Volvo for 4 years now and it has had zero issues, no creaks, fit and finish is great. So no, I wouldn't be concerned about owning a Chinese made vehicle, not in the slightest.
Well, the standard advice for getting off the ground with most endeavours is “Do things that don’t scale”. Obviously scaling is nice, but sometimes it’s cheaper and faster to brute force it and worry about the rest later.

The unscalable thing is often like “buy it cheap, buy it twice” but it’s also often like “buy it cheap, only fix it if you use it enough that it becomes unsuitable”. Makers endorse both attitudes. Knowing when which applies is the challenging bit
It's hard to see the steelman case for this. The transcript of their objections at the initial hearing are on page 13 of the transcript [1]

> The FTC's highly prescriptive proposal requiring numerous disclosures, multiple consents and specific cancellation mechanisms is a particularly poor fit for our industry. Our members offer services in a variety of custom bundles. They're provided over a wide range of devices and platforms. Consumers, for example, frequently subscribe to a triple play bundle that includes cable, broadband and voice services. They may face difficulty and unintended consequences if they want to cancel only one service in the package.

> The proposed simple click-to-cancel mechanism may not be so simple when such practices are involved. A consumer may easily misunderstand the consequences of canceling and it may be imperative that they learn about better options. For example, canceling part of a discounted bundle may increase the price for remaining services. When canceling phone service, a consumer needs to understand they will lose 9-1-1 or lifeline services as well. Especially important, low-income consumers could be deprived of lower-cost plans and special government programs that would allow their families to keep broadband service.

I mean, except for the 9-1-1 point, I guess I feel like all of those policies -- the bundling in particular -- should ALSO be disallowed.

[1] https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/ftc-negative-op...
Yes, phone theft is rampant in London. The thieves are rarely caught and if they are, they get off lightly. Or released early from prison, because our prisons are full.
CHERI: https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/security/ctsrd/cheri/

> CHERI extends conventional hardware Instruction-Set Architectures (ISAs) with new architectural features to enable fine-grained memory protection and highly scalable software compartmentalization. The CHERI memory-protection features allow historically memory-unsafe programming languages such as C and C++ to be adapted to provide strong, compatible, and efficient protection against many currently widely exploited vulnerabilities.

CHERIoT is work towards bringing similar things to RISC-V for IoT use-cases.
Nuke 'em both then. Seriously. Partisan politics, regardless of the side they take, should not belong in the judiciary.
Modern historians are now pretty sure there never was a "Silk Road"

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/jsb5my/comme...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silk_Road#Name;_and_contested_...
Lemons also has extremely specific safety requirements; they're a best in category example of how to do relatively cheap safety.

https://24hoursoflemons.com/safety-checklist/
Rider is so much smarter than anything Microsoft has made. It was much better IntelliSense-like features than Visual Studio/code.
I'm referring to CS 1.2 or so, back in ~2002.

The thing I remember was that my friend's graphics card had a global transparency setting built in (AKA a wall-hack mode lol). You could see other players come into view as soon as the came into an area that was rendered. Then a CS patch came out and the players weren't visible until very shortly before they would become visible had we not had the uhh... transparency mode on haha.
Before the internet, if you were an insufferable moron, your social circle would likely curb your behavior to a more acceptable level.

Now you find communities of like-minded insufferable morons, giving support and cheering each other, and no one to say "cut it out, don't be such an imbecile".
>Basically the only anti cheat that is somewhat successful.

And yet Valorant and every other game with kernel-level anticheat seems to have been hacked anyways
What more can we expect from the James Webb Space Telescope?
> Drinking. Cocaine addiction. Meth.

Ozempic treats all of those too.
The Return of Doggerland?
GLP-1s are completely different from all those drugs. There's no reason to use them as evidence for it.
Dimethylmercury is terrible for you even in moderation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KH95kw9REEU
> If management is measuring pull request (PR) throughput, is it really so bad that developers start pushing through smaller PRs? God forbid we end up delivering value faster with fewer defects, better testing, and more thorough peer review.

This one bothered me. Because increased pull request (PR) throughput does not, in ANY way, imply "fewer defects, better testing, and more thorough peer review". In fact, it probably implies the reverse; just writing the smallest amount of code you can to get it out the door, then coming back and adding to it later. Edge cases? Next PR. Automated tests? Next PR. Comments? Next PR. Maintainability? Next PR. Taking the time to make sure the feature you're working on makes sense? That's not a PR, skip it.

Measuring PR throughput is the same as measuring lines of code, effectively. Nothing about increasing either one of them implies adding real value.
Callgrind to measure impact of performing 3x more database queries or 3x more microservices calls?

I don't block PRs because of micro optimizations but my examples aren't.
The article is titled as a mystery and then framed as a mystery while answering the question: lifestyle factors heavily influence cancer.

The article demonstrates this by a known factor, tabacco. Other lifestyle factors are similarly predictive and already known, like diet and pollutants (which the article mentions).

The article curiously doesn’t mention detection bias: the tendency for increased access to diagnostic tools or medical evaluations to lead to higher rates of detection/incidence. This is almost certainly true of comparing rural Armish to city dwellers, and has a demonstrated enough effect to explain the difference in non-tobacco related cancer cases between the two groups - and much more likely an influence than genetic protective differences.

The genetic angle is likely to be so minimal to be trivial, IMO.

Long story short: this isn’t very new or interesting.
Positive deviance by chance? Are you referencing the Sternin's work Vietnam in the 90s?
I think that may very well be the first time ever I hear Emacs called a "simple tool"! :L
The latest in North Korea's fake IT worker scheme: Extorting the employers
I tend to think a major contributory factor to the indifference (at best) about commit hygiene is that people vastly underestimate the power of "show commit history for this range of lines" in modern IDEs/GUIs for Git.

It's incredibly powerful for (just from decent commit messages) figuring out why some little detail in the code is the way it is.

I'm thankful every day that I get to mandate Gerrit (so rebased-patches-on-top-of-main) workflow with every individual commit going through CI.

ETA: Incidentally, I'm usually also someone who often gets called in to figure out obscure-yet-important bugs... and the commit log is instrumental to that.
> is now often referred to as Type 3 diabetes.

No it isn't. Stop trying to make fetch happen.

> Improving physical activity leveled

It doesn't appear that this is the issue. You can't explain a recent trend (obesity) using something that hasn't changed recently. And exercise is not very effective for weight loss compared to diet (it's something like 20%/80%).
> Is video calling your friends and family depressing?

Could be. I tend to get depressed after positive interactions.
> Honestly I don't know why there are so many almost identical IDEs.

Probably a reflection of internal organization to avoid product teams stepping on each others' toes.
Thanks. That was really hard to guess from the website, but I supposed the intended audience already knows what this is.
I'm of course very skeptical more VC is a good thing and will continue using my profile on Bluesky to grow my newsletter[0] just in case.

That said, if anyone can make it work, it's the team there. It's no accident the CEO was able to navigate Bluesky's exit from Twitter.

[0] https://kyefox.com/newsletter/
There's a probably apocryphal story that a Japanese higher-up realized the war was lost when they found out the US had enough spare capacity to build ice cream ships for in-theater cold treats (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_cream_barge).
Very impressive. I love how subsidence zones are clearly visible in the 3d view.

I think if I had a feature request it would be an option to have a fixed interval(or window) of time visible, rather that the current method of a fixed start time. for example one year behind current. This can sort of be achieved by moving the start and end bugs in sync, but that was less than satisfying in practice. The thing that would make sense is to be able to drag the illuminated part of the time line.

If I had a second feature request it would be to assign what feature(depth, age, magnitude) is mapped to the color axis, nothing wrong with depth here, I just noted that it was redundant in the 3d view.
CHERI is an instruction set extension[1], which is aimed at increasing security:

The CHERI memory-protection features allow historically memory-unsafe programming languages such as C and C++ to be adapted to provide strong, compatible, and efficient protection against many currently widely exploited vulnerabilities.

These features enable new software constructs that are incrementally deployable within existing software ecosystems.

So while it's possible to add CHERI to existing projects, to get the full benefits they decided they needed to go all-in, hence CHERIoT.

[1]: https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/security/ctsrd/cheri/
People pay for JetBrains instead of the free VS Code, and there are reasons for that, like IDE features and quality. Anyway there is no need to start an IDE war here, use whatever works for you and your coding, but I am sure that a small company can't offer free stuff and survive like big tech can do, so as a paying customer I want them to survive and make good products rather to give free shit to people that don't want to pay for their tools.
I think Jake Sullivan's protectionist philosophy is super old school. I'm not a huge fan since it's just more Cold War-era policies coming out of Biden's cabinet. I'm speaking about the policies of lawmakers only and not the politics.
Do you mean Rustler?

Yes, it's Apache 2.0

https://github.com/rusterlium/rustler
A more interesting question is why are EV's built in the West so expensive.
Serge Semin's Goodbye to the Linux Kernel
Genuinely curious: What do you expect to hear from your CPU or GPU?
You're right that they probably don't disconnect it. Honestly, I've never considered what happens when it's disconnected, as it's always been when I move out of a place.

Needing somebody to show up to connect it made me assume someone disconnected it, but a status check makes more sense.
I played 2048 A LOT back when it came out. I still fire it up every now and then.

Thanks Gabriele, what a fantastic game you have made.
Source code of the NHS Covid-19 iOS app
Absolutely not I’m serious and that is exactly what is going on, it would be trolling to pretend the opposite or accepted the status quo as final.

Obviously we need to use a way to not harm and destroy our environment more but we are on a good way on that. But technically we need much much more energy.
I have to ask, did the game make you rich?
Thanks for the extra information! I didn't realize it was that strict in that area. I stand corrected.

I actually went and re-read the rules for the three tracks I most commonly go to (just in case I was mistaken/misremembering), however there are no noise provisions at all.

>some stock exhaust systems do not comply from factory (i.e. Subaru WRX STi);

Yikes! They definitely wouldn't like my WRX STI.
So you force your devs to use your favortie IDE rhater then the best one? why not force them to use soem better stuff for this security purpose like virtual machines, docker , something that would be usefull for them to have experience with
Suddenly it's a national security issue.

Suddenly USGov issues emergency production licenses and orders domestically to drop that down to effectively $0.10/kilodose on the market.

Suddenly when Denmark (or whoever) whines, USGov sends a cumulative NATO military defense bill, tells them they are the reserve currency, they have bigger nukes, and tough shit next time don't pork barrel the American people.

Lots of options for Americans; question is, can we be unprincipled enough to take the steps neccessary? :^)
I'm not a chemist, biologist, or pharmacologist, but wouldn't it be more reasonable to be cautious based on how analogous the method of action is to other drugs, rather than the effect? GLP-1s don't work in the same manner that phen/fen did, for example.

DNP is an extremely effective drug for weight loss, but no one who knows anything about how it works would think that it would be reasonable to compare it to the GLP-1s, and anyone who knows how it works would also plainly see the dangers around its use.

GLP-1 type drugs have been on the market for decades now as well, and while they are not perfectly safe, we've got a good amount of data around the short to medium term side effects.
It seems as if our history written by mediterranean cultures and the history as a huge inland cultural gap.

I think the various Tepe's they are riding in Turkey and this discovery point to a whole new history to consider.
Show HN: Desktop Sandbox for Secure Cloud Computer Use
Yeah that's the same deal as r_drawothermodels, crudely forcing the GPU to render objects that are behind other objects would give you a partial wallhack, but that wouldn't disable the engines occlusion culling so once it determined that an object was definitely no longer visible it would skip drawing it altogether, and you would stop seeing it through walls. "True" wallhacks were able to override the clients occlusion culling and reveal everything, so to defend against that the occlusion culling needs to happen on the server, which came much later.
My very personal opinion is that LSPs haven't contributed very much in the area of turning text editors into cohesive and integrated development environments that I enjoy using. One still gets to spend a lot of time and energy fishing for the right extensions, some with overlapping or incompatible scopes and capabilities. And this to be repeated for every project, framework and language. That's very ad-hoc, unsatisfactory, and the extent to which plugins can "do their thing" is generally superficial and limiting, setting the bar very low for what's possible to do (an example of that is how many plugins inform about their state via dumps of logs into ever piling and popping up consoles, this is very distracting and suboptimal).

The other paradigm is to have actual tooling and UX specialists having put time and effort curating a developer experience that is as smooth and distraction free as possible. And in my experience with the JetBrains IDEs, that doesn't even come at the cost of extensibility (you still have support, either official or community-based, for esoteric stacks and languages, and those can piggyback on the more sophisticated and adequate UX palette).

What should be the deciding factor is the resource consumption, then: if you end up with a less refined and less capable LSP+Extension enhanced text editor, it better be lightweight, right? Well, here again it's pretty clear that those LSPs and Extensions are everything but that, and not only JetBrains IDEs start fast (which was a big area of focus recently), they also respond better using comparable resources.

Just to be clear, I don't hate vscode, I have it installed, but the extent I use it is very limited because it sits in this uncanny valley where it's too bloated for one-off editing of small things like config files (for which I use vim) and editing whole projects folders (for which it's far from delivering as good an experience as an IDE)
Motor Trend just gave the Lincoln Nautilus - a SUV made in China - their award for SUV of the year[0] and noted its build quality. While "Made In China" still carries a bad rap, I think that's going to change pretty quickly for more luxury goods like cars.

[0] https://www.motortrend.com/news/lincoln-nautilus-2025-suv-of...
Because other interventions have the consequence of actually working.

If we compare the efficacy of "telling people to lose weight" vs taking ozempic, there is a stark contrast. Pooled results show that education and counselling[sic] did not significantly reduce weight (SMD –0.73, 95% CI –1.89 to 0.42, n = 3 studies; I 2 = 98%)[1]. The mean change in body weight from baseline to week 68 was −14.9% in the semaglutide group as compared with −2.4% with placebo[2].

Telling people to just lose weight is not an evidence-backed intervention to affect weight loss. Continuing to practice it is equivalent to practicing folk medicine or alternative medicine. Despite us wanting it to work, it does not. Like all interventions, pharmaceutical interventions have the possibility of side effects, and it's up to the patient and doctor to weight risk vs reward. There is variation in both for each case, but we have to keep in mind that the mere existence of side effects is not typically a reason for categorically deciding against using a drug.

1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7154644/

2. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2032183