skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And not to move the goalposts, but I think we should also be tracking any time the human driver feels they need to take control because the autonomous system did something they didn't believe was safe.

That's not a crash (fortunately!), but it is a failure of the autonomous system.

This is hard to track, though, of course: people might take over control for reasons unrelated to safety, or people may misinterpret something that's safe as unsafe. So you can't just track this from a simple "human driver took control".
This kind of feels like an accidental release, would not expect one of the big frameworks to drop a new major with so little doc around it?!
Same. At least with SSD's rebooting isn't as painful as it was in the spinning rust days.
To those here who suggest buying a typical 'smart' TV and disconnecting it from the internet, there are a few issues. As some have pointed out, TV manufacturers will catch up with this and eventually make it harder. Embedded 5G, voiding warranty if you don't accept ads, etc.

Buying 'smart' TVs also sends a signal to the manufacturers that this is what people want (as some here have suggested). It perpetuates the delusion that ad-ridden TVs are acceptable. Vote with your wallet and buy something else.

It's also somewhat profligate to buy hardware and deliberately disable it (although I entirely understand the motivation and hacker ethos). That hardware represents sunk resources. Buying it to ignore it leaves a bad taste for me. Electronics manufacturers are ecological bad news, in general. I'd rather not contribute to unnecessary manufacturing if I can avoid it.

Regarding quality of image, I kinda suspect that the necessity for ultra-high def TV has been over-sold. Sure, for gaming, home cinema, etc it might be a real concern for some. For me, I've got a genuinely dumb TV and nobody has ever commented on the image quality for TV or movies or gaming (Switch). But maybe this is one area where the visual equivalent of audiophiles will never be dissuaded :)
Based on your feedback, I’ll be switching to a credit-based pricing model. I’m also looking to build a community around this and add a gamified experience. Thanks so much for all your input—I really appreciate it!
One could even argue (from a raw individual utility perspective - aka selfish) that if the person/people who did that suffered no negative consequences, they’d be fools to not do it again elsewhere.

The evolutionary function certainly encourages it, correct?

Ignoring that means that not applying consequences makes one actually culpable in the bad behavior occurring.

Especially if nothing changed re: rules or enforcement, etc.
Well, they say that, but in my experience at least, that is just conjured up as a more palatable explanation after the fact. While I do think that a certain, even significant, amount of automation is good, there is also a large mass of unemployed that can undoubtedly be trained to fill these "human interaction" kind of roles (support). This workforce is still not hard to find at all. We just don't want to do that - there is not a single western country left that has low unemployment as its key prerogative.
My mistake, nothing is behind that
How about when it turns into oncoming traffic, the driver yanks the wheel, manages to get back on track, and avoids a crash? Do we know how often things like that happen? Because that's also a failure of the system, and that should affect how reliable and safe we rate these things. I expect we don't have data on that.

Also how about: it turns into oncoming traffic, but there isn't much oncoming traffic, and that traffic swerves to get out of the way, before FSD realizes what it's done and pulls back into the correct lane. We certainly don't have data on that.
How could an effect precede a cause if there were no speed limit to causality?

No matter how fast an effect propogates, it is always after the cause (with an infinite speed, I guess effects happen instantaneously, but not before).

Of course, this doesn't fit with a universe described by general relativity, where time can be different for different observers. But you wouldn't have a universe described by general relativity without that constraint in the first place.
Meta: I have noticed many comments written in this style lately. Long-winded with out-of-place internet shorthand. It is as if someone is deliberately trying to sound youthful while not really knowing how. It is the "how do you do, fellow kids" of writing styles.

I am not sure what sort of LLM-powered bot is behind them, or whether it's one person with some sort of schizophrenia, but once you notice it you will see at least one of these per popular post.
I have question, we still do not know what behind "neuron network" of machine. What if we gave them some syntax of a language (or syntax of a area) then ask them extract a general rule for that language ? Can them can do that ?
The mobile clients also have this proprietary dependency, from what I was able to tell.
Yeah, this dysfunction is not a bug, it's the feature. In some ways, it's useful, because it allows positive risk-taking that could not be taken if anyone was actually held (or even just felt) accountable. But at this point, as a society, we've shifted too far towards enabling accountability-free behavior from corporations.

I think a good example of the dichotomy here is Starlink. On one hand, it's an incredibly useful service that often has a positive impact. On the other hand, a private corporation is just polluting our low earth orbit with thousands of satellites.

It's not clear to me where exactly the right balance for something like this should be, but I do think that as of today, we're too far on the lessez-faire side.
There aren't very many good modern, maintained vanilla js libraries. But for just about anything I need in React I can find something polished and well supported that just works.
The smartphone is fine. It’s the apps that suck, and most of all it’s advertising.
Commit0: Library Generation from Scratch
Don't make an account.
"the corporation doesn't provide any protest path"

This. The problem with "voting with your wallet" is that you can't vote "no", you can only vote "yes" or abstain from voting altogether.
If it catches on, I wouldn't want to have to assume that would always be the case.
Yes, most commercial SIP providers are required by law to support emergency services, at least in the US.

If we're getting technical it is a mobile phone, just not a cellular phone. A cellular phone will work anywhere it can get a compatible cellular signal and this will work anywhere with decent WiFi.
I find the Gervais Principle very illuminating but would love to hear how you turned it into career growth. Did it motivate you to indulge in Machiavellian scheming and join the ranks of the Sociopaths? Or let you make peace with a fate among the Clueless?
My only hesitation with recommending Chromebooks is the fickleness with which Google treats its offerings. One of MS's strengths is their support of legacy technologies. They may deprecate things, but one doesn't have to go out of one's way to keep such tech afloat.
> is it a hijacking, if they own that page in the first place? The community placed trust on that owner of the page to be impartial

I would say yes, it is hijacking. It is very very similar to any MITM attack ever, like anyone in the looong chain of trust deciding that they will do something with the trust they have. Like, can your ISP redirect google.com to their own google.com? They surely can, and it probably wouldn't even break their contract with you. It would be a trademark infringement, probably GDPR violation, but not much else.

Since WordPress.org acts as a traditional package repository, they can: serve you the package, or don't serve you the package for various reasons. Everything else is hijacking or worse, especially if the intent is just to turn you their user, and the result is to break your website. Even if you don't have a contract with them that they will serve WP Engine's unmodified plugin to you.
That excuse was made up after the fact. They didn't even have their message straight. One of the links in the article is about Pete Buttigieg giving a totally different explanation as to why Tesla wasn't invited: https://cleantechnica.com/2021/08/05/u-s-secretary-of-transp...

If it was a UAW event, perhaps he should have called it that and not the "EV Summit". Elon Musk has every right to be annoyed that he was not invited to such an event, although he has taken it 100x too far. But Elon Musk isn't a public official and Biden is the president. He has public duties. He ought to have been smart enough not to snub the richest man in the world, who rightfully should have been invited, over a stupid PR event.
You should not trust any software that needs to raise money from VCs that markets itself as 'free software'

https://techcrunch.com/2022/09/06/open-source-password-manag...
We need more of this - identification and clear instructions rather than any clickbaity "10 best plants to have in your home" nonsense.

Would second the opinions in the comments that I'd need to know if this is going to be useful to me before I signed up to anything.
What I said is how it should be, not how it is.
I have to imagine that as a company, investing back into the company for the future will be a pretty easy lawsuit to win.

Especially when your stock price has returned back to where it was before a lot of divestment started.
The article starts by unambiguously saying yes and later on gives examples:

> PDFs, like other file formats, can have hidden JavaScript code that might exploit vulnerabilities in a PDF.

and

> Opening a malicious PDF can launch malware that will start up whatever process the hacker has in mind.
Asuswrt-merlin custom firmware can be installed on some asus routers and supports wireguard, among other things.
European space chief says Europe must be able to compete globally
Yes, but it’s still fine to have a customer service only answering in the official language. The chance are high that a random German speaks english so you’ll probably be good but if that’s not the case, blaming the company seems unfair to me.
DawVert – a DAW project file converter
It's in the name, limited liability company.
To be clear, there won't be a "wipe out" at least in the "floor fell out from left field" sense.

If a bankruptcy becomes likely, investors will start selling Boeing stock to recover what they can. Creditors will start calling Boeing bonds, if applicable. Remember, "the market has priced it in" is a meme for a reason.

So far we haven't seen anything like that yet, just otherwise normal reductions in stock valuation following lackluster business performance.

However, Boeing is courting the possibility of having their credit ratings reduced to junk bond status by Moody's[1] and S&P[2] and that would certainly be a potential sign of the end times coming. Getting slapped with junk bond status literally means lenders should not consider Boeing reasonably solvent.

[1]: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/boeings-bonds-are-being-sn...

[2]: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/boeing-biggest-ever-us-fallen...
We do that for reasons of practicality: the US is built around cars. If we were to revoke the licenses of the 20% worst drivers, most of those people would be unable to get to work and end up homeless.

So we accept that there are some bad drivers on the road because the alternative would be cruel.

But we don't have to accept bad software drivers.
Depends why you are doing outbound for a low ARPA product.

What problem is cold email solving, and will it eventually solve it? If the product is good enough for the initial customers, I’d switch to marketing and inbound sales.

One reason to stick with cold email is if the product is not good enough yet, so you need to chase people to talk to you and get them to help you improve it
Not sure. I mean, even that "minority" who buys software on Windows, has to be orders of magnitude larger compared to macOS userbase.
An allostatic regulator for echo chambers on social media
Wow, this really opened my eyes! I hadn’t thought about it from that perspective. hank you so much for helping me see that! I will completely remove subscription, change pricing model to credits, pay as you go.
> The airlines used to check IDs themselves. Now their computers talk to those of the TSA so the TSA effectively does this for them.

Have you flown pre-9/11? I've never had an airline check my ID domestically, pre or post-9/11 in any TSA or privately-secured airport. When did this magical computer integration happen? Citation? How do I start an airline? - relevant CFRs and required systems capabilities should be publicly documented?

> You will be stopped because the ID for that boarding pass never went through a TSA checkpoint.

Citation needed. Personal experience absolutely differs here. These are archaic systems and can't even handle middle names consistently.

Also, what a joke: my unmarried passport has a completely different name, but I am flying with a boarding pass ticketed to my married-name DL. My wife does this regularly and it's not illegal.

In the last several years even, I've purchased countless flights post-security, sometimes tens of minutes prior to boarding. These people are just not this organized.

"Fallacies programmers believe about X" applies here: names
and DOBs are far less "matchable" than you'd believe them to be.

> What if you go back through TSA again, this time with the other boarding pass? They only check IDs now, so you'd need a second ID that also had your picture on it. Drivers licences were easy to forge 20 years ago. Not so much now, especially with the RealID mandate.

It's a wonder where a $2000 Zebra dye sublimation printer and $3 Chinese-origin multi-spectrum holographic overlaminates will take you. Add a PDF417 barcode with zero authentication and you've got a pretty simple task.

> Even then it wouldn't work because TSA has face recognition now. If you try to go through a second time with a different ID but a similar face on the same day, you will almost certainly be detained and probably arrested.

So, opt-out of facial recognition in favor of enhanced screening? I do this regardless of any other factors

How does this even make sense?.. Twins can't fly together without detention? My doppelganger is now going to invite law enforcement scrutiny? The point of this facial recognition wasn't to prevent fake or duplicate real IDs, it was to prevent people using IDs without matching photos and tricking incompetent minimum-wage screeners.

Singular dollars in makeup and the correct lighting conditions completely destroy these matching systems, as well.

(Thankfully, efforts are being made to eliminate TSA facial recognition tech: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/336...)

You've got a wildly overinflated view of the competency and the capabilities of this government jobs program: probably exactly what they are going for.
Don't build, use Casdoor or Keycloak.
The German mail rail and track operator (Deutsche Bahn) isn't private but 100% state owned (and control sits with the federal government). They wanted to privatize it a couple of decades ago but abandoned it. There is still some hybridization between supposedly it being a business and also a public service left in the law, though.
No idea what your limits are on the free plan. Your onboarding requires a lot of clicks to get going. Maybe reduce that a bit?
If we are really nitpicking, they said it's plausible you could build an abstract representation of the world by studying language-based data, but that it's possible it could be made to effectively reason too.

Anyway, it seems to me we are generally all in agreement (in this thread, at least), but are now being really picky about... language :)
Nobody deserving of the name "engineer," or more generally anybody who is actually mentally capable of any kind of creativity or innovation, gives the slightest shit about those worthless credentials and bureaucracy other than to be irritated by having to waste time obtaining them.
Noted! I will redo everything.
The 7 Stages of Robot Replacement (2011)
Huh, didn't know that. But iOS doesn't support it, so it's not needed on the AP side even for wifi calling.
https://media.snopes.com/2023/01/sony-fig-9.png
Hm. That’s a possibility. As I understand it though, an infinitely massive object would not move in space, and would experience time at the absolute rate of one second per second.

Although that sounds theoretically impossible, I would remind you that somehow the opposite seems to be possible (a particle with zero mass that moves through time at a rate of zero seconds per second), despite that not making a lot of sense to a layperson.

Footnote: Talking about time in seconds makes very little sense here because our notion of time is so heavily linked to how light moves through space, but hopefully my point is clear. Maybe someone has a better unit we could use to measure time independently of space?
> I think a good example of the dichotomy here is Starlink. On one hand, it's an incredibly useful service that often has a positive impact. On the other hand, a private corporation is just polluting our low earth orbit with thousands of satellites.

Seems like a terrible example to me. I'm no fan of Musk, but I don't see how that is "polluting".

They provide an excellent service. They're a minor hindrance for astronomy, true, but I think it would be hard to make a good case for that a few people having a good view of the sky is more important than millions having good communications.

Then there's that there's nothing really special about Starlink. It's merely one of the first users of cheap rocket launches. It could be somebody else, or 1000 different entities launching smaller numbers, in the end the effect on astronomy would be the same.
This might be true if your only options are "find someone to blame" or "add more bureocratic process", but in a lot of cases you also have the option "fix the technology"

Even in aviation and surgery, improving the technology tends to be more effective than firing the pilot/surgeon or adding more paperwork. If you find there's a button that crashes the plane, fix the button. Don't fire the pilot or add another hour of education on how to not press that button.
A major mistake of the IETF was to not standardize IPv4 NAT. Had it been standardized early on there would be fewer problems with it.
I think the example here is that the designer draws a bridge for a railway model, and someone decides to use the same design and sends real locomotives across it. Is the original designer (who neither intended nor could have foreseen this) liable in your understanding?
If the message said "you release software", or "approve" or "produce", or something like that, sure. But it said "you write software" - and I don't think that can apply to a company, because writing is what individuals do. But yeah, maybe that's not what the author meant.
It's a cool example and I guess there are or will be very convenient apps that will stream the last X min of screen recording and offer help with what you see.

But it just hurts my programmer soul that it is somehow more effective to record an app, that first renders (semi-)structured text into pixels, then record those millions of pixels into a video, send that over the network to a cloud and run it through a neural network with billions of parameters, than it is to access the 1 kilobyte of text that's already loaded into the memory and process locally.

And yes there are workflows to do that as demonstrated by other comments, but it's a lot of effort that will be constantly thwarted by apps changing their data-structures or obfuscating whatever structure they have or just because software is so layered and complicated that it's hard to get to the data.
> Safari Reader View doesn't work on this page.

What do you mean? I just tried it and it was fine.
Wealth never trickles down. If we’re insisting on liquid-based metaphors, we can say it “evaporates” or is “siphoned”. But it only goes in one direction, and it isn’t down.
Sounds promising but still needs to be independently validated. Its always wise to take AI medical research with a grain of salt.
Works by Pissarro, Renoir and Avercamp Vanished. How Art Sleuth Cracked the Case
Or to put even more straightforwardly: people who choose to drive rarely expect to drive more than a few 10s of k per year. People who choose to write autonomous software's lines of code potentially drive a billion miles per year, experiencing a lot more edge cases they are expected to handle in a non-dangerous manner, and have to handle them via advance planning and interactions with a lot of other people's code.

The only practical way around this which permits autonomous vehicles (which are apparently dependent on much more complex and intractable codebases than, say, avionics) is a much higher threshold of criminal responsibility than the "the serious consequences resulted from the one-off execution of an dangerous manoeuvre which couldn't be justified in context" which sends human drivers to jail. And of course that double standard will be problematic if "willingness to accept liability" is the only safety threshold.
It’s probably more helpful to think of them as spectra or overlapping circles of behavior. When we talk about psychological disorders, they are clustered and only useful insofar as they allow professionals to talk to one another and mean the same things.

Undoubtedly each human displays a unique case and manifestation of whatever behavior we choose to specify, and that individuality can pull from different “trait” or “behavior” groups on a scale.

It’s only when we start to lump together many cases that we begin to discern between types and patterns, but it’s silly to make a harsh distinction between clusters and then pretend like they are emphatically different from the next. Grouping can have its uses, but we shouldn’t forget each person presents uniquely.
There is some degree of accountability for DB: Other organizations like Swiss and Austrian railways stopped taking schedules of DB seriously and stopped waiting or booking through.
Does it matter in the frame of investigating relations between cognitive processes and languages?

Other animals have cognitive processes, and languages, or at least it seems to be something scientifically consensual. Thus the surprise reading the kind of statement given in introduction.

Whether humans have exceptional language habilites or even "just" a biggest board to play on with the same basic facilities seems to be a completely different matter.
Throwing someone out from a marketplace is .. quite common. They (marketplace owners/publishers) don't need much reasoning for it, and I'm sure they did it many times bc they've perceived on of their clients dangerous to them, or wanted to take over their businesses.

But silently redirecting the users to yourself is practically unheard of, and it is indeed a red line.
Thanks a lot! But it surely open my eyes, with subscription model + need to provide more "real" value.
My measurement is "would I accept/tolerate to host them for months if they’d lose their home" and vice-versa.

(It’s not would I do it because I think that I would it for more people that I know than just my friends just by empathy, but more if it would bother me)
Given how good the rail systems are in several Asian cities despite/thanks to being private, you might want to reconsider that opinion.
They are separate jobs done on separate accounts.

My business profile has an audience that I interact with. However I only go there if I have something to post, or to reply to interactions. Hence “write-only”.

I am not an influencer. My face is not on the internet. I am just a guy running a locally popular website, and I use social media to talk about the stuff I am working on for this website.
I think it's better to continue give some free credits for new sign-ups.