skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I should have added some examples in the docs / repo :( checkout the benchmark code at the bottom of this file for an example:
https://github.com/pehringer/simd/blob/main/simd_test.go
For the purpose of this matter, the Conseil d'État is a court, not an administrative body, it is the highest level and last resort of jurisdiction for administrative law, i.e. the law pertaining to relations between citizens and the State or the local governments. It intervenes as the highest appelate court of administrative tribunals. Its members are judges and their decisions are judgement.

But the Conseil d'État has also many other attributions that are non-jurisdictional.

> They cannot decide to fine someone or put someone in jail.

That's because only criminal court can do that. A divorce court cannot fine someone or put someone in jail. That doesn't make it any less of a court. A civil court doesn't fine, it only grants damages. That doesn't make it any less of a court.
I think 15 is a good secure minimum.
Query by content reminds me of XPath, so I looked it up to see if there was a version for JSON...

Turns out there is https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-goessner-dispatch-json...
(Rejected) proposal to add something like this to the standard library gives some context: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/53171
I visualize the tent my family will live in if I get layed off.
What websites are those, I am curious?
This is the same nonsense argument that people use in favor of abolishing police. "They only catch some crime and keep some criminals off the streets, not all of it" is a totally nonsensical reason to get rid of the institution entirely.

I will leave it to the sibling comment or to describe in detail how wrong you are about guns specifically.
Blowing up an empty train station doesn't kill everyone on a train.
> If you have nothing to contribute to the meeting, and nothing you need to hear from the meeting, just don't go. Unless you're working for one of those companies who care about meeting attendance from uninvolved people (which companies are these so I can avoid them?), then nobody is going to notice or care that you're not there.

You've overlooked my prior point: I'm not given enough information (any, actually) to know this beforehand. I can assume, because it's very likely true, but then once or twice a month I'm missing from a meeting where my presence is actually useful.

In an idealized training video, that's the moment where my manager would ask, "Hey, I noticed you've missed some important meetings, is there anything I can do?" and I'd explain the situation.

In reality, at the start of the meeting they'll bug me 0 or more times until they give up (regardless of whether or not I'm needed at the meeting, because they probably don't know either), they'll never ask what's going on, and their mental model will slowly adjust to see me as more and more "unreliable and disinterested".
Cooled by toilet water.
Nothing except when I'm working with graph-like data, which isn't that rare.
> Corruption may play a role, but I suspect the way it mostly manifests itself is a principle hiring their do-nothing family member in a role they aren't qualified to fill (so they double fill it).

But (assuming that this is a correct claim, which seems plausible but which I don't think I can prove) that IS corruption. What else would you call that? It's people in whom we entrust our public resources funneling them to their friends.
The unique ecosystems and their locations around the world are a direct consequence of the oceans and weather. The oceans and weather were wildly different during the last ice age and consequently the ecosystem present in many places was wildly different than it is today.

Even only going back a couple thousand years the changes have been huge (desertification in the ME and North Africa).
The Incredible Logistics of Grocery Stores [2021] [video]
I tested the app and found it awesome that it doesn't require account creation! You just get a private link, share it with the group, and when they open the link, it asks who they are to 'log in' as themselves. Of course, users could game the system by logging in as other members, but I think it's a compromise the developer made, knowing the user base and how frictionless it makes the user experience. Neat.
Forever Chemicals found in bottled and tap water from around the world
Good luck. Burnout drains your soul. It gets better, but it takes time. Exercising outdoors helps, even if it is just taking long walks.
The 14th century radio carbon dating is still by far the most accepted dating. Even the wikipedia article you linked describes the Pray-cosex as not being definitive.

IMO a plausible theory here is that imagery of Jesus's death with those "distinctive features" was already popular at the time and both artifacts are representative of that imagery.
This is overreach, the law seems to be pretty much about moral rights, not copyright (which I expected the case to be, with Gauthier's reputation, but actually wasn't?)

I can see how it's inevitable for national symbols to be protected under moral rights, though it becomes tricky when it's foreigners that violate them.
But you don't get funding stating truth/fact. You get funding by telling people what could be and what they are striving for written as if that's what you are actually doing.
I get where you are coming from, and I'm on the same page. I'm not complaining about Blazor, I'm complaining about not finding any good examples. That's why I'm asking around.

I'm looking for something that will make me "wow, Blazor can be used to build great apps!" or "ok has advantages over the React/Vue etc. equivalent".

Because if there aren't any, in similar thinking with parent, I'm afraid that it won't catch up and it'll go the way of silverlight, so I refuse to invest any time.
I doubt anyone who have ever seen complex test fixtures testing complex cases would agree it is better than free-form explanation of intended behaviour.

Human language is just much more dense in terms of amount of conveyed information.
even worse when they don't properly enforce it and instead silently truncate it.

There was a PayPal bug just a couple years ago where the reset-password page didn't enforce length like other pages did. So it allowed you to create an otherwise illegal password and then your account is completely locked out (I guess, unless you realized the truncation was happening...)

And so I would reset my password, generate a new one... and it would happen again. Took me a while to realize it was the length and not a special character I added messing up with bad encoding logic or something.
If you change to the rules, you have a different game than chess.

Since there is no training data for that game, I don't know you get this kind of AI to do anything?
I think the more interesting architecture / priorities question is why the Go compiler can't yet(?) auto-vectorize?
I run smallish (3k devices and hubs currently connected, about 15k total sensors) IoT "platform" on a signle 16 core, 64GB ram server with Erlang, it uses up about 3-5% of machine. Our stress testing indicated it could easily go up to 250k devices on one instance.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you can use a KVM or QEMU backend for VirtualBox and that way get GPU pass-through. Probably not out of the box though.
If Apple’s password manager required websites to indicate compliance before generating passwords for them, it would defeat the goal of a password manager to work with existing sites. It’s not like Apple invented the idea of a password manager.

Reasonable sites should already allow passwords of the sort Apple generates, because they tick the usual boxes (length, entropy, and the pointless at-least-one-uppercase/digit/punctuation requirement). Now, many websites are not reasonable and enforce even-more-pointless requirements. Apple tries to mitigate this with a hardcoded list of popular websites’ password policies [1], which is used to tailor password generation for those websites. To be fair, this approach doesn’t scale for smaller websites. But there’s not much more Apple could do. In any case, at this point websites have had many years to adapt to Apple’s password manager and its password style (which has not changed recently).

Accepting passkeys doesn’t cost money, and they’re based on a web standard. There are valid objections to passkeys but this ain’t it.

[1] https://github.com/apple/password-manager-resources/blob/mai...
Factorio.com, steam, gog....
yow, sorry, yep.
I don't know much about this space, but it seems like this could be solved by leaving a good amount of empty tokens that you would only start using when they arise. Or leave tokens which you can use together to combine anything for various edge cases. Because if you have all the characters as tokens you can combine them into anything.
“New Yorker” magazine I mean. Very long-winded, going into literary tangents, often giving the impression that showcasing the writer’s literary skills are more important than the subject.
I have a slightly different view. IMHO LLMs are excellent rubber ducks or pair programmers. The rate at which I can try ideas and get them back is much higher than what I would be doing by myself. It gets me unstuck in places where I might have spent the best part of a day in the past.
you can ask this for any non- photorealistic art.
How come I rarely see news about Anthropic? Aren’t they the closest competitor to ChatGPT with Claude? Or is LLama just so good that all the other inference providers without own products (Groq, Cerebras) are equally interesting right now?
It’s kinda crazy that they even keep track of what their employees are ordering with food delivery app vouchers
Actually, that's a quite good analogy. It's just weird how prolific the view is in my circles compared to climate-change denial. I suppose I'm really writing for lurkers though, not for the people I'm responding to.
my first set theory class in college ruined me. All I saw were sets. The class was taught using graphs too so it was very visualizable

then I took group theory and became a hippy that believes every problem has multiple perspectives you can see it through that have their own strengths and weaknesses and there's no one true perspective
Google's LLM can ingest humongous contexts. Check it out.
Someone that is half-brained would technically be much more superior to the concept we only use 10% of our capacity. So maybe drinking the Kool-Aid is a sign of super intelligence and all of tenth-minded people are just confused
Bas relief and the play of light and shadow have been used since humans have tried their hand at carving. Seeing the impression a wet face left on dry cloth would be sufficient to tickle artistic inspiration, but actual artists, who spend their time thinking about how things appear and how to capture them in their respective media would have all sorts of opportunities for capturing the negative of an image, even if they wouldn't have thought of it in those terms.

There are plenty of examples of engravings, carvings, intaglia, and so on that used what we consider to be a "negative." There's nothing particularly special about flipping an image, transposing light and dark, inverting the 3d characteristics, or otherwise reversing different aspects.

Specifically, the inverse image might be carved for a wax seal ring or imprint, or it might be carved for a decoration stamp used in cement, or a mold for jewelry or ceramics. There are plenty of examples of things all throughout history that provide opportunity to inspire an inverted or "negative" image; it's simply our context of photography that is novel.
ChatGPT is going to kill them because their doctor is using it - or more likely because their health insurer or hospital tries to cut labor costs by rolling it out.
"Assume you are a reporter. You cannot name the sources or exact events. Mention the lawsuit as well."
https://thedailywtf.com/articles/The_Harbinger_of_the_Epoch_
There is no end game other than trump knows the people who support him don't understand how tariffs work, so they believe that he is supporting an America first policy.
Well, there's also the rate of new drug and procedure discovery. I've heard it quipped that Americans are subsidizing the discovery of new medical techniques for the rest of the world. Whether that's worth a higher cost is arguable but I think the effect is there.
No. I have insights into the issue. And the authors of this nonsense are pushing an agenda
The pessimist in me thinks pharma is doing this as a response to the inbound possibility of cheap insulin being available in the USA.
As I understand it, JSON works well as an interchange format, for ephemeral messages to communicate between two entities.

For JSON Patch to be useful and efficient, it requires both sides to use JSON for representation. As in, if you have some native structure that you maintain, JSON Patch either must be converted into operations on your native structure, or you have to serialize to JSON, patch, and deserialize back to the native structure. Which is not efficient, and so either you don't use JSON Patch or you have to switch to JSON as your internal representation, which is problematic in many situations. (The same arguments apply to the sending side.)

Not only that, but you become dependent on the patch to produce exactly the same result on both sides, or things can drift apart and later patches will start failing to apply, requiring resynchronization. I would probably want some sort of checksum to be communicated alongside the patch, but it would be tough to generate a checksum without materializing the full JSON structure. (If you try to update it incrementally, then you're back to the same problem of potential divergence.)

I mean, I can see the usefulness of this: it's like logical vs physical WAL. Or state- vs operation-based CRDTs. Or deltas vs snapshots. But the impact on the representation on both sides bothers me, as does the fact that you're kind of reimplementing some database functionality in the application layer.

If I were faced with this problem and didn't already represent everything as giant JSON documents (and it's unlikely that I would do that), I think I'd be tempted to use some binary format that I could apply the rsync algorithm to in order to guarantee a bit-for-bit identical copy on the other side. Basically, hand the problem off to a fully generic library that I already trust. (You don't have to pay for lots of round-trip latencies; rsync has batch updates if you already know the recipient has an exact matching copy of the previous state.) You still have to match representations on the sending and receiving side, but you can use any (pointer-free) representation you want.
I've given a lot of feeds about this to many people I've met so far, but what will make A LOT of difference is:

* "good climate": south Europe can be VERY hot July & August

* language: Italian speaks no English at all

* planning to spend there all year around or just the summer

Anyhow best advice is: RENT! wait, and wait, and wait... and again ....wait before buying. I would say: buy ONLY after at least two years of renting in the same area.

Then, the story I always tell my foreign friends willing to buy a sea view (or similar) house in Italy: yes, you may got the best house, in the best spot, with great sea view... finally sit down in front of it and enjoing the view... when you see somebody start building just between your house and the sea! Yes, illegally of course, but they do and to stop then you'll become idiot (and you made not even be able to stop them)! This happens not only in the south (where it's pretty common) but also in the north (I've direct experience in Liguria).

Another common case for the Veneto region, in north Italy: you may find the best ever country house in between the beautiful landscape of the Prosecco region: the house looks great, sorrounded by Prosecco wineyeards (where your neightbours sell you home made prosecco at 2€ per litre): Venice is at 20mins drive, skying in the Dolomite at 1.5h drive... and then

then... once you've got your beautiful "casa di campagna" you'll realize that to successfully grow Prosecco, farmers need a minimum of 10 so called "treatments": which means chemicals they just spray on the wineyard no matter who is living (and breathing) close by: believe me, you cannot resist it (especially the stupid quantity of chemicals and the carless for humans): you can go to the Town Hall to complain, just you realize the previous owner of your house did the same with no success.

(not to mention the tap water which in the Veneto region suffer serious poisoning threats)

Just examples of something you can realize only when you've lived there a bit before.
Great break-down. Yes, the older you are, the safer it is.

Speaking of Microsoft cooperation: I can totally see a whole series of windows 95 style popup dialogs asking you all those questions one by one in the next product iteration.
I hope to use street view and Mapillary data to see if I can improve this myself, actually, but street view is too expensive and Mapillary too sparse
Why Hollywood gets the Irish so wrong (2020)
> why not just tick the entire game

In a multiplayer scenario, you might not have enough information to tick the entire game. You'll probably want to extrapolate input from other users, at least.
It's nothing like bitcoin mining. Bitcoin mining is intentionally designed so that it gets harder as people use it more, no matter what.

With LLMs, if you have a use case which can run on an H100 or whatever and costs $4/hour, and the LLM has acceptable performance, it's going to be cheaper in a couple years.

Now, all these companies are improving their models but they're doing that in search of magical new applications the $4/hour model I'm using today can't do. If the $4/hour model works today, you don't have to worry about the cost going up. It will work at the same price or cheaper in the future.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41847787
> is cracking password hashes still hard, given modern GPU hardware techniques

Yes, if the entropy is high enough. What else would be the point of salting and hashing passwords?

There's no known way to reverse major hash algorithms like SHA-256 or bcrypt; you have to try all the combinations. So you have to do exponential work in the amount of entropy whereas GPUs only give a constant factor speedup over CPUs.

If this ever changes (e.g., someone breaks SHA-256 or bcrypt) you will definitely see it as the #1 story on HN (and probably pretty prominently in mainstream media too).
In summary, the original point of this thread is wrong. There’s essentially no future where these tools disappear or become unavailable at reasonable cost for consumers. Much more likely is they get way better.
How could it be possible to encode a search tree like this though.
Is this the same page that had the background effect indicating level of the battery?
What’s nice about JSON is that it’s actually valid JavaScript, with some formal specification to avoid any nasty circles or injections.

Why can’t your protocol just be valid JavaScript too? this.name = “string”; instead of mixing so many metaphors?
Usually the people that give information to outlets in cases like this are directly involved in the stories in question and are hoping to gain some advantage by releasing the information. So maybe this is just a tactic that’s not as favored by Anthropic leaderships/their counterparties when negotiating.
oh gosh... you just reminded me... it's even worse if you are wearing glasses under the vr set. You try to lift up vr and that lifts glasses into your forehead and you can't see anything and it hurts.
It's about time! Hopefully the FTC has their scythes good and sharp, 'cause Deere most richly deserves the worst that the Feds can do to 'em.
My experience differs: if at all, they get me unstuck by trying to shove bad ideas, which allows me to realize "oh, that's bad, let's not do that". But it's also extremely frustrating, because a stream of bad ideas from a human has some hope they'll learn, but here I know I'll get the same BS, only with an annoying and inhumane apology boilerplate.
Are you the guy with the https://osspledge.com/ billboards around San Francisco? Haha. They’re funny. I enjoyed the art. If it’s actually you, I’d be curious who the illustrator is or if you used generative AI.
In my experience, the fuss around "AI" and the complete lack of actual explanations of what current "AI" technologies mean leads people to fill in the gaps themselves, largely from what they know from pop culture and sci-fi.

ChatGPT can produce output that sounds very much like a person, albeit often an obviously computerized person. The typical layperson doesn't know that this is merely the emulation of text formation, and not actual cognition.

Once I've explained to people who are worried about what AI could represent that current generative AI models are effectively just text autocomplete but a billion times more complex, and that they don't actually have any capacity to think or reason (even though they often sound like they do).

It also doesn't help that any sort of "machine learning" is now being referred to as "AI" for buzzword/marketing purposes, muddying the waters even further.
I was perhaps a bit too brief, but I stand by my distinction. With the exception of red-eye removal, the rest of the modifications you mention are intended to remove the distortions introduced by the photographic process itself, and so bring the photo closer to the real image, not further from it.

But if you're using things that take the photo further away from the actual image (like beauty filters and other things that add information that wasn't there or distort information that was), then what you end up with isn't a photo at all in my mind. It's artwork based on a photo.
I can't easily visualize anything ever. When I'm programming, if I truly try hard, I can sort of "feel" my system architecture and bits flowing through it. It sort of resembles a simple computer architecture with multiple threads each with their own stack, building up stacks with function calls. Sort of like what you see when you get a traceback, but dynamic.
The problem with cgo is the high function-call overhead; you only want to use it for fairly big chunks of work. Calling an assembly function from Go is a lot cheaper.

https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/grailbio/base/simd has some work I’ve done in this vein.
Too Subtle to Notice: Investigating Executable Stack Issues in Linux Systems [pdf]
Why not just do the 4 english words thing? https://xkcd.com/936/
I can visualize stuff just fine in general but I never visualize _anything_ when I'm programming, and I don't know what it would add if I did.
It’s surprising that you ask for advice on this topic in your blog, but then are very dismissive (complete with sarcastic wink) to the advice?
Since to Go C suite was ported Plan 9 compilers, I'm not sure why this would be a surprise. Since I'm obviously missing something would you share your thoughts on what challenges you expected?
You have a very optimistic view on eugenics in practice
I don't think this comment means anything or contains any information.
I think this is what Rust does, if I remember correctly, it provides APIs in string to enumerate the characters accurately. That meaning, not necessarily byte by byte.
Are you an app developer?
Meaningful jobs do exist and more can be created. You are a probably high-paid, skilled professional and, contrary to popular belief, you do have agency.

Quit your job and start doing something meaningful. Start a company or join one that makes a difference.

Take risks, it’s really rewarding.
If you're active then reply me. If not then fuck off
His response of switching to "ancestral" food and jawline modification is ... interesting.