skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
AFAIK, while there is a standard for Ethernet-over-Thunderbolt, typical Thunderbolt docking stations simply expose the underlying Ethernet controller as a PCIe device, typically using a chipset with drivers that are widely available if not preinstalled on all major OSes.

In other words, they not hubs (or switches) in the Ethernet sense, just a different physical connection to an otherwise ordinary PCIe NIC.

I imagine non-Thunderbolt USB docks are similar, presenting as a USB hub with a garden-variety USB Ethernet controller attached to one of its ports.

With that said, I imagine a "smart monitor" with integrated dock would additionally include Ethernet switch-like functionality, to enable sharing of a single physical Ethernet port (or wireless connection) between the connected host and the smart TV subsystem, just as some servers allow sharing of a single Ethernet port between the installed OS and an onboard BMC.
But conscious experience does produce observable effects.

For that not to be the case, you'd have to take the position that humans experience consciousness and they talk about consciousness but that there is no causal link between the two! It's just a coincidence that the things you find yourself saying about consciousness line up with your internal experience?

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/fdEWWr8St59bXLbQr/zombies-zo...
https://xcancel.com/SvelteSociety/status/1260209026563858432
What I don't get is: if people provide information on those individuals, such as their locations, appearances, activities, etc...how does that help materially further actions against them? They are probably all in Russia, ex-Soviet states.
The de facto for Western plant species ID is Pl@ntNet/iNaturalist (free and citizen scientists will ID if there is uncertainty). Then you just look up care instructions? I would absolutely not trust ChatGPT.

I say Western as the training data is skewed by common species and usually they’re a bit geographically limited (for example BirdNET works best if you use a localised model).

Also if you use these free services, you can contribute natural training data which is valuable - even for well represented species.
These are management games, not factory games.

Crafting games are games where a lot of the gameplay is combining items in particular ways to get new items.

Factory games are crafting games where you build raw logic, wires, conveyor belts etc. for automating crafting. Some are pure factory games where automation is the only way to craft anything, others reveal their debt to modded Minecraft by having a player person who does the first crafting by hand.

There were arguably factory games evolving alongside Minecraft, in particular Zach Barth's programming/automation puzzle games. But you'd be hard pressed to find a factory game before modded Minecraft.

The first game anyone built a working computer in was Dwarf Fortress, although through unintended game mechanisms. I believe this was what inspired Notch to add redstone to Minecraft, the first intended game mechanism for Factory-style gameplay.
I agree with the feeling, but State orgs are effectively eternal (think the various level of government) and still great at diffusing accountability to various scapegoats
Company, singular.

Companies, plural.
Interestingly though for AI, this doesn’t necessarily mean we need a different model architecture. A single large multimodal transformer might be capable of a lot that an LLM is not (besides the multimodality).
> HN is full of people that dont want self driving to succeed for some reason.

I would love for self-driving to succeed. I do long-ish car trips several times a year, and it would be wonderful if instead of driving, I could be watching a movie or working on something on my laptop.

I've tried Waymo a few times, and it feels like magic, and feels safe. Their record backs up that feeling. After everything I've seen and read and heard about Tesla, if I got into a Tesla with someone who uses FSD, I'd ask them to drive manually, and probably decline the ride entirely if they wouldn't honor my request.

> fortunately, it's clear as day to some of us that tesla approach will work

And based on my experience with Tesla FSD boosters, I expect you're basing that on feelings, not on any empirical evidence or actual understanding of the hardware or software.
Wow... Really great.

Can you add some historical archive to listen n hours ago (or morning briefing like) summary as a feature?
> Ghazi says that as these headsets are increasingly brought into operating rooms, it’s crucial for doctors to take precautions, especially around patient privacy. “Any device that is connected to a network or WiFi signal, has the potential to be exposed or hacked,

Never mind being hacked, what data is being sent to and collected by Apple? Why should I trust them? I'd be furious if I found out my doctor was using a product like this without my knowledge and consent. Even if you, for whatever reason, actually believe that Apple and every Apple employee or third party contractor who might ever have access to your data is 100% infallibly honest and incapable of error once VR headsets become common in the surgery other companies pushing that kind of tech will want in on the action including facebook and microsoft.
Nice article :) Ive got some maybe unrelated questions about the feedback loop of the strong typing in code generation.

Ive experimented with automated code generating agent systems on localhost multiple times. Ive got some ok results when it was a project spanning over multiple files without any dependencies. But when I tried to cross a milestone of creating a web apps with lets say flask and some db, ive hit a wall. The problem were the dependencies and api hallucinations and the version/api inconsistencies of dependencies in genereated code. The system had a feedback loop with self-written tests, but even the output of the tests fell into neverending loop. Maybe the problem was python? Maybe annotations would help, maybe should use go?
I completely disagree with this take.

First of all, NAT is what saved the Internet from being forked. IPv6 transition was a pipe dream at the time it was first proposed, and the vast growth in consumers for ISPs that had just paid for expensive IPv4 boxes would never have resulted in them paying for far more expensive (at the time) IPv6 boxes, it would have resulted in much less growth, or other custom solutions, or even separate IPv4 networks in certain parts of the world. Or, if not, it would have resulted in tunneling all traffic over a protocol more amenable to middle boxes, such as HTTP, which would have been even worse than the NAT happening today.

Then, even though it was unintentional, NAT and CGNAT are what ended up protecting consumers from IP-level tracking. If we had transitioned from IPv4 directly to IPv6, without the decades of NAT, all tracking technology wouldn't have bothered with cookies and so on, we would have had the trivial IP tracking allowed by the one-IP-per-device vision. And with the entrenched tracking adware industry controlling a big part of the Internet and relying on tracking IPs, the privacy extensions to IPv6 (which, remember, came MUCH later in IPv6's life than the original vision for the transition) would never have happened.

I won't bother going into the other kinds of important use cases that other middle boxes support, that a hostile IPv4 would have prevented, causing even bigger problems. NAT is actually an excellent example of why IPs design decisions that allow middle boxes are a godsend, not a tragic mistake. Now hopefully we can phase out NAT in the coming years, as it's served its purpose and can honorably retire.
What claim would there have to be to file on the scenario outlined?
> At the current rate of improvement it will be quite good within a year and in two or three I could see it actually reaching the point where it could operate unsupervised.

That’s not a reasonable assumption. You can’t just extrapolate “software rate of improvement”, that’s not how it works.
> I did like the new anti-toxicity features on Bluesky though: [The Verge article about a new Bluesky feature that allows cited accounts to remove themselves as a citation in other accounts' posts retroactively.]

But this feature only reduces the usefulness of the quote/citation feature.

In low trust quote scenarios, users would likely revert to sharing screenshots of the referenced post. This maintains control over the referenced content, but reduces authenticity since screenshots can be faked.

Maybe I'm yelling at the clouds here, but I think all content in the post should be controlled by the account making the post - much like the original Twitter RT convention. ...or HN.
Is YouTube playing Twitter games to those who don't play ball
Hey guys whats going on, I saw what you guys did when discovering what happened with Twitter and its delayed access to rival accounts and I was wondering to what extent you can analyze common metadata. the reason why I'm bringing this up is because I'm a content Creator on YouTube and I really feel like the platform has been rationing my channel views (I'm only allowed to make a certain percentage of views per day). Also, I feel like its hiding my channel from being discovered from Search and discovery and I was trying to see whether you guys had the ability to measure if there was something wrong there. I didn't post my channel link yet but depending if it is possible I'll post it up
I can provide another POV to that story. We checked in as a family of four, and we're assigned seats in four different rows, with a two and a four year old. Only when entering the plane we had the possibility address this to a human and we were assigned new seats.

So this might be the reason you had to change seats.
It's good for small data, but the Iceberg format would be nicer for bigger data sets.
I agree we are not limited with the data set size: all humans learn the language with the much smaller language training set (just look at kids and compare them to LLMs).

OTOH, humans (and animals) do get other data feeds (visual, context, touch/pain, smell, internal balance "sensors"...) that we develop as we grow and tie that to learning about language.

Obviously, LLMs won't replicate that since even adults struggle to describe these verbally.
The automations predate any demographic issues - mostly a (sticky) cost thing.
The entire article on the WSJ

https://archive.is/JGSd6
Absolutely.

I want the basic functionality to work without JS.

But we have a working application and users are not hating it and used to it.

We rely on modals heavily. And for that I added (custom) JS. It's way simpler than alternatives and some things we do are not even possible without JS/WASM (via JS apis to manipulate the DOM) today.

I am pragmatic.

But as you mentioned it, personally I also use NoScript a lot and if a site refuses to load without JS it's a hard sell to me if I don't know it already.
4g/LTE runs on it. So you use it too, via your phone.
After dealing with the xz backdoor I've become a lot more suspicious of binary blob test data which can't be explained or reproduced. Of course in some cases it's unavoidable.
> impossible to repair by a "regular" person.

What do you mean by that? Unless it’s an e-bikes most modern bikes are extremely standardized and IMHO generally better quality than older bikes (unless we’re exclusively talking about fixed gear steel frame ones)
(Honestly) Cool, the problem with such options is: it's the lifetime of the app, not mine.
20 years of Linux on the Desktop (part 1)
Or you try to capture water that's already condensed... cloud droplets.
The best darn grid shader yet (2023)
A vps is going to cost $5/mo forever, a lambda is going to cost $0.5/mo and not run into scaling issues ever, so why should I bother with a vps? I just don't see the bright idea
Very unlikely. Most likely NAT would have happened to other layers of the stack (HTTP, for example), causing even more problems. Or, the growth of the Internet would have stalled dramatically, as ISPs would have either increased prices dramatically to account for investments in new and expensive IPv6 hardware, or simply stopped acceptong new subscribers.
Angular is really popular for corporate apps, in companies who use .NET. Possibly because Angular has batteries included.
> A lot of people I know predicted Twitter would be completely shut down within a year of Musk's acquisition.

As one of those people, I'm definitely eating crow. Three things happened that bode well for Twitter's future:

1. Musk has attracted a loyal core of true believers that think he has saved free speech with the Twitter purchase.

2. The Overton window of online discussion has started moving right. In particular, companies are becoming less interested in toeing a left ideological line with their ad spending.

3. A bunch of people who hate X and hate Musk and his politics stayed on Twitter! To me this is most surprising of all, but perhaps shouldn't be because many of these same people posted to Twitter in the past while simultaneously calling it things like "the hellsite"[1].

I'm no longer sure we'll ever "get there" other than if a new paradigm marginalizes all of social media the way social media marginalized blogging.

[1] https://samkriss.substack.com/p/welcome-to-hell
Mark Cuban Criticizes Trump's Tariff Plan
It can be helpful to get a diagnosis of autism for kids in public school. Kids end up needing additional one on one time and resources are limited. Those with the biggest problems are the first to be approved for these resources, and a formal diagnosis makes it easier to get that approval.
Bitwarden is no longer free software
That philosophers talk about p-zombies seems like evidence to me that at least some of them don't believe that consciousness needs to have observable effects that can't be explained without consciousness. I don't say that I believe that too. I don't believe that there is anything particularly special about brains.
Lol. The argument used to be that it is quite sad that people waste half an hour of their lives watching a sitcom.
Using the terminology from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_assignment_ma... :

Are you saying it's better to have an Accountable person than an Accountable group, while I was attempting to say if a group is Responsible then they'll probably be more effective if they all each believe they're accountable?

Then there are the situations where an Accountable person has no power over the Responsible group, leading them to implicitly (most often) or explicitly say זבשך: "that is your problem"...
It's "cybernetically enhanced"!
Not all systems are web sites. Those issues are not inherent to the concept of end-to-end testing.
What happened 50 years ago?

Will this result in flowers from a seed bank blooming, I guess with dunes there’s little viable seeds close to the surface, but then the Sahara isn’t all dunes.
In the 400 blows, Truffaut plays a schoolteacher whose disciplinary methods in the classroom only accentuate the rebelliousness of a boy. At home, this trickles down and he decides to run and drink milk. At the end, we find him on a beach and the film ends.

Enforcing copyright law through an honest projection of 35mm film footage is a philanthropic endeavour. Making sure that every member of the production team, even the gaffers and stage hands take part in the exclusivity of re-capitalisation efforts, like the Fox complaint, is purely, legalistic sleight of hand.
That is still incorrect. Once the handshake completes the browser absolutely doesn’t care about HTTP with regard to message processing over WebSockets. Therefore just achieve the handshake by any means and WebSockets will work correctly in the browser. The only browser specific behavior of any importance is that RFC6455 masking will occur on all messaging leaving the browser and will fail on all messaging entering the browser.

> You can't just say

I can say that, because I have my own working code that proves it cross browser and I have written perf tools to analyze it with numbers. One of my biggest learnings about software is to always conduct your own performance measurements because developers tend to be universally wrong about performance assumptions and when they are wrong they are frequently wrong by multiple orders of magnitude.

As far as custom implementation goes you gain many liberties after leaving the restrictions of the browser as there are some features you don’t need to execute the protocol and there are features of the protocol the browser does not use.
> VCC +4.5 to 15V

With everything going 3.3V these days with no 5V tolerance (can't have nice things ofc), is there some kind of 333 timer that would do the same job but down to those logic levels?
Oh sweet summer child. Companies are frequently structured and created in multiple jurisdictions to obscure beneficial ownership, responsibility, profits and taxes.
Thank you for your feedback. I’ve deleted your account, so there’s no need to worry about that. This is the first launch of the app, and I’m working on resolving all the issues quickly. I appreciate your patience and understanding!

---
Jfkgjfkckfu Eurufjc cnsudjf si deleted.
--

I will set 7 days trial without payment, from what i got from feedback
It's a bloated, unnecessarily overcomplicated piece of trash.
While I certainly wouldn't object to how you handle merging cars (it's a nice, helpful thing to do!), I was always taught that if you want to merge into a lane, you are the sole person responsible for making that possible and making that safe. You need to get your speed and position right, and if you can't do that, you don't merge.

(That's for merging onto a highway from an entrance ramp, at least. If you're talking about a zipper merge due to a lane ending or a lane closure, sure, cooperation with other drivers is always the right thing to do.)
Unsurprisingly, others are getting jealous of Apple's iron fist and are trying to emulate. Having your users utterly at your mercy promises untold new profits.
128m blades and 242m height wind turbine produce electricity to power 96K homes
Any other way?
This was the internet we loved, I miss it.
I have a feeling that Gwynne Shotwell has basically told Elon to stay away from everyday operations. He's demonstrably unstable at this point, and SpaceX operations are too life-threatening to have Elon be more than a figure-head and financier at this point.
It was always intended to be on the shuttle. It's not as if they conceived, designed, and then created it between STS-1 and STS-2. It was baked into the software and into the rear flight deck controls. It was late.

They didn't call it "flying the arm" for nothing:

https://www.alamy.com/stock-image-sts077-307-017-19-29-may-1...

In any case, STS-1 was an insane test flight, and had it's own share of thermal tile problems.
> has 55km (35 miles) of slopes, three chairlifts and 10 drag lifts

That’s not large, but rather small.

> The loss-making Alpe du Grand Serre has also suffered from ageing infrastructure and a lack of investment over the past 40 years.
> The local authority has spent nearly €3m since 2021 on a project that would keep the resort open all year round, attracting visitors with hiking and bike paths, but said it did not have the money to continue with it for the final two years before completion.

So no investments for a long time and not sufficient budget to diversify. Looks like they were lacking any longterm survival plans.

> Alpe du Grand Serre, a collection of six villages at an altitude of 1,368 metres, (…)

Global warming will put a lot of winter sports resorts at lower altitudes out of snow business. Diversify or face a similar faith.
I’m curious if they would use the same logic for russian roulette. If you spin the barrel with one bullet, pull the trigger against your head and survive does that mean that the danger wasn’t that serious?

NASA wasn’t saying that they know for certain that the Starliner will have a catastrophe on the way back. What they said is that they cannot be certain that the probability of it having a catastrophe is lower than some decision threshold.

Using the russian roulette as an analogy NASA has a revolver with a barel for a million bullets, and they decided they are fine to pull the trigger against the astronauts heads if there are less than 5 bullets in it. But due to nobody really understanding the mechanism of previous anomalies they don’t know how many bullets there are in the barrel. There might be six or more so they are not willing to pull the trigger. (The number of bullets, and the number of chambers is merelly illustrative. I don’t know what is the real number NASA uses.)
Ah, I meant that post to be a reply to the ticket machine eating the 50 euro note.
I'm still using a ThinkPad T560 bought in 2016, with a i7 and 16Gb RAM, running Pop!_OS. It has discrete nvdidia graphics as well as integrated. Battery life is still OK for my needs (I got the larger battery option originally, and I still get about 6-7 hours).

So it works fine for everything I need to do. I sometimes look at new laptop models, but there is nothing much they have that would make any difference to me.
You're confusing terms here. Voter fraud is fraud by voter. This is not what we're talking about with the voting machine susceptibility.
I think it is a matter of perceived risk.

Realistically speaking, nuclear power is pretty safe. In the history of nuclear power, there were two major incidents. Considering the number of nuclear power plants around the planet, that is pretty good. However, as those two accidents demonstrated, the potential fallout of those incidents is pretty severe and widespread. I think this massively contributes to the perceived risks. The warnings towards the public were pretty clear. I remember my mom telling stories from the time the Chernobyl incident became known to the public and people became worried about the produce they usually had from their gardens. Meanwhile, everything that has been done to address the hazards of fossil based power generation is pretty much happening behind the scenes.

With coal and natural gas, it seems like people perceive the risks as more abstract. The radioactive emissions of coal power plants have been known for a while and the (potential) dangers of fine particulate matters resulting from combustion are somewhat well known nowadays as well. However, the effects of those danger seem much more abstract and delayed, leading people to not be as worried about it. It also shows on a smaller, more individual scale: people still buy ICE cars at large and install gas stoves into their houses despite induction being readily available and at times even cheaper.
This article isn't about compile-time regex (which is in many languages, including javascript) though? It's compile-time regex MATCHING.
No, you’re not allowed to hit pedestrians on the freeway either.

There are many reasons why a pedestrian might be on the freeway. It’s not common but I see it at least once a month and I drive extra carefully when I do, moving over if I can and slowing down.
> The person who answered couldn’t speak English.

It sounds like this was the main point of failure. I’m not sure it can be considered an error in the system. I’d consider the risk inherent in traveling in a country without knowing its language.
Thanks for your input! Yes, there are many apps out there. Originally, I made it for a friend who was paying $20/month for GPT. I really appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts!
Machine conquest: Jules Verne's technocratic worldmaking
I'm curious what users of Svelte think about https://qwik.dev, have many of you been tempted by it? There are a lot of similarities and both are great at keeping file sizes down with a great DX.
If this is anything like an LG smart TV — and, as the UI is identical to my C4, I assume it is — none of the agreements are required to use the device as a monitor.

On LG TVs, at least, you can also completely disable the WebOS UI via a command sent through an onboard RS-232 interface, at which point the TV displays no overlays at all.