skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Invoicing or bleating on social media is great advice if you want to (i) make some lawyers slightly richer, most of them at your own expense and/or (ii) spend the rest of your life wondering why you don't seem to be getting job interviews...

Following the suggestion of somebody who thinks that people who follow their suggestions should be invoiced for an arbitrary amount or publicly shamed would seem like a bad idea regardless ;)
Do you mean boto (the python SDK for AWS)?

EDIT: They probably do not, I'm guessing they mean https://docs.getmoto.org/en/latest/index.html ?
Facebook does (or at least used to when I left it a few years ago) this too. They give you a huge dump of your data and photos, with an html file to help you navigate it better.
There's a bunch of enterprise stuff built on Flash and Air right? I heard China's train network ran on Flash. They also kept using XP for ages for similar reasons (maybe still are?)
Abosaary1414@gmail
Is the old pentium safe? Or the and fx CPUs?

I love how far and and Intel have come, and how you can get a massive arm CPU, but these modern hardware security issues seem to be a more frequent issue(is this true?) And to stop them one takes a decent performance penalty..... Which is way less than ideal.
That's the result without wireguard. With wireguard:

> depending on the use case for a Pi Zero WireGuard server, it could get the job done with ~30-40 megabits per second speed capabilities.
And yet Tesla's FSD never passed a driving test.
Vb2g
In the first comment you seemed to have commented on the effect of the Deutschland ticket and now you seem to comment on the difference between US and German cities. Somehow I don't understand the connection between the two / your point.
I think you’ll find it’s more code than you might initially imagine from how simplistic it appears to be.
HTML supports video just fine and has for years. Can't imagine why it would be an issue.
> It's clear that having half the casualty rate per distance traveled of the median human driver isn't acceptable.

Were the Teslas driving under all weather conditions at any location like humans do or is it just cherry picked from the easy travelling conditions?
If it helps, they actually named it after their desired CLI abbreviation:

> The command-line tool is called jj for now because it's easy to type and easy to replace (rare in English). The project is called "Jujutsu" because it matches "jj".
> I very much doubt that every American makes 9k per month.

We know they don't[1]:

> For the year 2022, the U.S. Census Bureau estimates that the median annual earnings for all workers (people aged 15 and over with earnings) was $47,960; and more specifically estimates that median annual earnings for those who worked full-time, year round, was $60,070.

The upthread's figure is $/mo; the higher (full-time) figure there is $5005/mo.

$9k/mo is within top 20%'tile. Every trying to read the statement as "most Americans" doesn't work.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_income_in_the_United_...
I think we should not be satisfied with merely “better than a human”. Flying is so safe precisely because we treat any casualty as unacceptable. We should aspire to make automobiles at least that safe.
burrurrrring burrurrring,Hello you have reached the US Government Prosecution Department,Elon division
please press #1 if Elon said something incorrect
press 2 for Elon is arrogant,get him 3 for all issues with fairness 4 for space beams and rocket chem trails and 5 for all other things that Elon is responsible for
I think what’s happening in my head is pretty similar to this - a slowly simmering flowchart.
The thing that doesn't make sense is the numbers. If it is dangerous in your anecdotes, why don't the reported numbers show more accidents when FSD is on?

When I did the trial on my Tesla, I also noted these kinds of things and felt like I had to take control.

But at the end of the day, only the numbers matter.
The S&P 500 is down 700 points on news of recent racoon mobs.
Can they subscribe to Y’s posts? (I mean, without creating another account.)

More generally, though, I agree. Twitter’s aggressive spamming of nearly every page with irrelevant posts (for example, the replies page) is a better reason to switch.
why would teh relationship fray ? when microsoft has openAI by the balls. They just don't own it "legally" due to monopoly concerns from DOJ. But they own it. Remember microsoft is entitled to 49% of OpenAI's profits till they recoup their investment.
That's like the protection fee you pay to the mafia boss.
Similarly I find Bing copilot very handy for exploring problem spaces and their solution spaces. Then i dig/ask deeper and deeper until i understand the solution. It is a quick way to brainstorm without diverting too much, and hence converging, since that tech knows a lot details about a lot of things.
Come on US, regulate interstate commerce and tell them to delete these cameras

Lidar is goated and if tesla didn’t want that they can pursue a different perception solution, allowing for innovation

But just visual cameras aiming to replicate us, ban that
Does anyone have suggestions for the smallest physical device that can function as a WireGuard server or a Tailscale exit node with decent performance?
That's a good point. Are there no published numbers on FSD?
Most likely, Lina Khan will be removed, the FTC will return to being largely inactive, and John Deere (and Big Tech) wins.
This was the missing piece! I'm glad we can finally put this wordpress drama behind us now.
Did the article say the Tesla didn't stop after the collision?
I really appreciate you sharing both sides of this story. Haven’t really made up my mind on the matter myself but both perspectives are interesting.
> This coupled with BMW's recent pushback against EU ICE phaseout seems to paint a picture of legacy manufacturers unwilling to invest in what is the obvious path forward.

It is not really obvious path when people in Europe are not buying BEVs unless there is some serious subsidy on it.
Being able to block people from seeing publicly posted content was always stupid.

Blocks should prevent people from engaging with you by replying to your posts or messaging you directly.

The fact that social media decided to utterly change what it means was just making echo chambers worse.

If you want to shout out to people who agree with you already just send it to them directly.
This doesn’t seem like it would work if the mobile browser was closed, phone was locked, etc. Am I wrong? I’d like to get away from apps but this doesn’t seem like a complete solution.
>> I would much rather have Honda kill someone than myself. If I killed someone, the psychological impact on myself would be horrible.

Except that we know that it doesn't work like that. Train drivers are ridden with extreme guilt every time "their" train runs over someone, even though they know that logically there was absolutely nothing they could have done to prevent it. Don't see why it would be any different here.

>>If we want safer cars, we can simply raise insurance payouts, and vice-versa

In what way? In the EU the minimum covered amount for any car insurance is 5 million euro, it has had no impact on the safety of cars. And of course the recent increase in payouts(due to the general increase in labour and parts cost) has led to a dramatic increase in insurance premiums which in turn has lead to a drastic increase in the number of people driving without insurance. So now that needs increased policing and enforcement, which we pay for through taxes. So no, market doesn't "work everything out".
Government "insurance" has several advantages:

- it has a much larger pool of insured, which reduces overall risk, and thus can have lower premiums/taxes

- there is no need for profits, which again lowers costs

- providers only have to deal with a single "insurer", which significantly reduces complexity of getting paid. Patients no longer have to waste time filling out paperwork about their insurance provider, and dealing with misunderstandings and miscommunication about whether they are insured, who they are insured by, etc.

- You no longer have to worry about if your preferred provider is "in network". Which also removes needless beurocracy.

- There is more of an incentive to care about longterm health, because the government will pay for all healthcare over the life of the patient. This used to be the case for private insurance, back when people stayed with the same employer, and same insurance company for most of their life. But now, insurance companies just want to minimize costs while you are with them, which probably won't be that long.

- Employers no longer have to waste time and resources providing health insurance for employees, and employees no longer need to spend time, energy, and anxiety on "open enrollment" every year.
You can measure risks without having to witness disaster.
I did. You're wrong. And you don't even have to "argue". It's a self-declaration.
Cars and drivers ideally shouldn't hit people who exited their vehicles after an accident on a highway. Identifying and avoiding hazards is part of driving.
> It also eliminates the silly fiction that a block prevented stalkers from stalking their target.

I would have made the opposite move, adding an option for paying customers to be invisible to logged out users.

We will see how it goes, but unless you add a rule to prevent people to screenshot tweets from people who blocked them and sharing that picture to their followers, I don't see how the changes are more improvements than regression.

And to be honest, I'm not sure I really care about this change, the two person I know that were harassed on Twitter aren't using it anymore, so :/

Hopefully the platform improve thanks to this change :D
Maybe other human drivers are reacting quickly and avoiding potential accidents from dangerous computer driving? That would be ironic, but I'm sure it's possible in some situations.
It was way safer to ride a horse and buggy
> teams compete rather than cooperate [...] political cover for taking the necessary actions they wanted to in the first place

That looks like three deeper problems than the consultants were tasked to solve.

(Not only do you have counterproductive, misaligned culture; but even the CEO can't/won't fix it; and the CEO even has to play political games, just to work around the bad culture, for smaller goals.)
Because it is bad enough that people really do supervise it. I see people who say that wouldn't happen because the drivers become complacent.

Maybe that could be a problem with future versions, but I don't see it happening with 12.3.x. I've also heard that driver attention monitoring is pretty good in the later versions, but I have no first hand experience yet.
> The quicker corporate clients become comfortable with chatbots, the faster they may simply go directly to their makers in Silicon Valley. If that happens, the great eight’s short-term gains from AI could lead them towards irrelevance. That is something for all the strategy brains to stew on.

The cloud divisions of "big tech" might be the catalysts for this upcoming disintermediation.
Philip Zimbardo, psychologist who led Stanford prison experiment, dies at 91
> And it bears a family relationship to the “principle of least astonishment,” which holds that if an explanation is too surprising, it’s probably not right.

Huh? I thought the principle of least astonishment was a design principle, very different from a scientific one. And this seems like a rather confused article about the philosophy of the razor in general.
I see very low engagement and half of my followers are obvious fakes. Although I previously said that Twitter as a product has improved, the content has become horrendous and I wouldn't be surprised if it shuts down after the US elections.

I even subscribed to to premium, but only to use Grok. It's not only alright for most task, its also the only LLM integrated with the current events feed(which is twitter) and its actually very useful to get informed about recent events.

Also, the app still has most of the interesting people but it feels like wandering into the most disgusting part of the town just to go to this cool club and I kind of feel like people wish those people move somewhere else.

I don't know, maybe Elon should just put a pop-ups with the few talking points that he keeps pushing for so I can accept and hide those from my timeline? Something like "I agree that the following people are horrible: ..." then "I agree that only Trump can save us from those" and be done with it. It's just boring, the same BS over and over again just so I can keep up with a few interesting people and current events.
I love high quality C++ that reads like C but doesn’t throw away the STL or litter everything with const
https://archive.ph/97sm7
Is Tesla required to report system failures or the vehicle damaging itself? How do we know they're not optimizing for the benchmark (what they're legally required to report)?
You can't equate airplane safety with automotive safety. I worked at an aircraft repair facility doing government contracts for a number of years. In one instance, somebody lost the toilet paper holder for one of the aircraft. This holder was simply a piece of 10 gauge wire that was bent in a way to hold it and supported by wire clamps screwed to the wall. Making a new one was easy but since it was a new part going on the aircraft we had to send it to a lab to be certified to hold a roll of toilet paper to 9 g's. In case the airplane crashed you wouldn't want a roll of toilet paper flying around I guess. And that cost $1,200.
I like fungi as much as the next guy, but I can't help but feel like this might be attributing more meaning than is really there. Wouldn't the whole result also be described by chemical gradients in food and water availability? Maybe this is addressed in the full paper, but it feels like that would be a simpler model that gives the same end result?
> traveled of the median human driver isn't acceptable.

It's completely acceptable. In fact the numbers are lower than they have been since we've started driving.

> Accidents caused by human drivers

Are there any other types of drivers?

> are one of the largest causes of injury and death

More than half the fatalities on the road are actually caused by the use of drugs and alcohol. The statistics are very clear on this. Impaired people cannot drive well. Non impaired people drive orders of magnitude better.

> technology that could save lives

There is absolutely zero evidence this is true. Everyone is basing this off of a total misunderstanding of the source of fatalities and a willful misapprehension of the technology.
Those statistics are incredibly misleading.

- It is safe to assume that the vast majority of autopilot miles are on highways (although Tesla don't release this information).

- By far the safest roads per mile driven are highways.

- Autopilot will engage least during the most dangerous conditions (heavy rain, snow, fog, nighttime).
> If it is dangerous in your anecdotes, why don't the reported numbers show more accidents when FSD is on?

Even if it is true that the data show that with FSD (not Autopilot) enabled, drivers are in fewer crashes, I would be worried about other confounding factors.

For instance, I would assume that drivers are more likely to engage FSD in situations of lower complexity (less traffic, little construction or other impediments, overall lesser traffic flow control complexity, etc.) I also believe that at least initially, Tesla only released FSD to drivers with high safety scores relative to their total driver base, another obvious confounding factor.

Happy to be proven wrong though if you have a link to a recent study that goes through all of this.
I don’t understand, it’s not two sides just evidence vs lack of evidence.
It's a great example of perception being more important than reality in business. Like the "close elevator door" buttons, whether they *do* anything or not is not the point—is not how you sell elevators.
> The answer is zero

If autopilot is 10x safer then preventing its use would lead to more preventable deaths and injuries than allowing it.

I agree that it should be regulated and incidents thoroughly investigated, however letting perfect be the enemy of good leads to stagnation and lack of practical improvement and greater injury to the population as a whole.
Despite what you may think, it isn't inherently illogical to be cynical. In fact, sometimes it's the appropriate point of view. Just the same, viewing the world optimistically is sometimes also viewed as naive.

In any case, the real issue with your logic is in thinking that an individual's personal views on the morality of a situation are correlated with the actual, potentially harsh, reality of that situation. There is rarely ever such a correlation and when it happens, it is likely a coincidence.

Is Sam Altman untrustworthy? Of course, he seems like a snake. That doesn't mean he will fail. And predicting the reality of the thing (that awful people sometimes succeed in this world) does not make someone inherently wrong or negative or even cynical - it just makes them a realist.
I took it to mean that you’d think it would have been annoying to have to repeatedly explain things, but he misses them.
I have not read article, because it's paywalled, but I was very sad reading the previous comments. Over the last few hundreds of years, the humanity has changed so much in the environment. Implications of things were not fully understood at the time they were introduced. I'm not saying whether these people are right or wrong, but calling them crazy is not really serving anything. Just imagine how people would look at you of you claimed you have serious health problems because of this wonderful new material called asbestos.
This document is the smoking gun regarding the absolute decline of Google search
Medicare costs $800 billion/year and only
covers 20% of the population. They are on average the most expensive 20%, but I doubt you’re going to cover all the rest for another $200 billion.

Medicaid is another almost $1 trillion/year.
Without opening the link, the problem with every piece of data I’ve seen from Tesla is they’re comparing apples to oranges. FSD won’t activate in adverse driving conditions, aka when accidents are much more likely to occur. And/or drivers are choosing not to use it in those conditions.
Geez, clearly they mean like a CDL
LLM inference library written in Rust with mistral.rs
The average snail is 2-5 cm, not 5-9 cm. Just sayin.
Meta layoffs are latest sign that constant job cuts are the new Big Tech normal
> In my view, it is a big problem for the fraud hypothesis because you have to explain why and how it was done.

Why is it hard to imagine the perpetrators just painted a model with red ochre and draped a cloth over him?

And you are misunderstanding the burden of proof, fraud is merely one possible explanation. Even if you show that its real blood instead of paint, how do you demonstrate that its not the impression of a dead medieval knight and was later mis-interpreted as a shroud of Jesus after the original creation was forgotten?

Those who would claim its actually the shroud of Jesus have the burden of proving it could possibly be old enough, that it could have been woven by peoples of that time, that the red ochre is actually blood, that Jesus actually existed, that he was crucified, and that he was laid in this shroud and its his blood.

And even then that doesn't show he was resurrected, or that he was divine, or a god, or anything to that effect. We have a ton of evidence Jesus wasn't, his own failed prophecy of the kingdom of heaven coming before the disciples passed, and his crying out for god on the cross.

Mostly we have the fact that the super active, super public god of the bible disappeared after all these stories were written and hasn't been seen since, despite claiming its the most important thing in the world that people know he exists. Essentially damning more than 90% of all the people who have ever lived to hell.
There've been variations on this saying/joke for at least as long as I've been working, not specific to McKinsey.

Example: "A consultant is someone who charges you $100K, to tell you at the end, what you told them at the beginning."
The time Bell Labs brought the Statue of Liberty under its roof (literally)
> ends up shuttering themselves for the good of all

mostly because it's difficult to handle all the abuse reports
California Bird Flu Dashboard
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

I don't disagree with your points. However, using React for making the UI portion of your game is still using React for game dev. The default would have been to just make your UI within the canvas itself.

Now in the post, I explained that considering option 1) Using React for the game rendering vs 2) Using React only for the UI, I went with 2) and explained why.

However, I want to thank you for explaining why React is unsuitable for rendering the game itself.
Great article.

Awful website.
> Unless the above report has some bias or is false

Welcome to Tesla.

The report measures accidents in FSD mode. Qualifiers to FSD mode: the conditions, weather, road, location, traffic all have to meet a certain quality threshold before the system will be enabled (or not disable itself). Compare Sunnyvale on a clear spring day to Pittsburgh December nights.

There's no qualifier to the "comparison": all drivers, all conditions, all weather, all roads, all location, all traffic.

It's not remotely comparable, and Tesla's data people are not that stupid, so it's willfully misleading.

> This report does not include fatalities

It also doesn't consider any incident where there was not airbag deployment to be an accident. Sounds potentially reasonable until you consider:

- first gen airbag systems were primitive: collision exceeds threshold, deploy. Currently, vehicle safety systems consider duration of impact, speeds, G-forces, amount of intrusion, angle of collision, and a multitude of other factors before deciding what, if any, systems to fire (seatbelt tensioners, airbags, etc.) So hit something at 30mph with the right variables? Tesla: "this is not an accident".

- Tesla also does not consider "incident was so catastrophic that airbags COULD NOT deploy*" to be an accident, because "airbags didn't deploy". This umbrella could also include egregious, "systems failed to deploy for any reason up to and including poor assembly line quality control", as also not an accident and also "not counted".

> Is there public data on deaths reported by Tesla?

They do not.

They also refuse to give the public much of any data beyond these carefully curated numbers. Hell, NHTSA/NTSB also mostly have to drag heavily redacted data kicking and screaming out of Tesla's hands.
Adobe has a powerful moat. That's why companies like MSFT can find better way to integrate AI into workflows rather than just AI companies without any moat.
That's true, we really lost that. Every page would load like static one.

Now pages not only take 3-20 seconds to build locally, but there are necessary cookie banner interactions and calls to action (Substack, Medium) that you need to dismiss before you even see the content.
Unfortunately there is also an AI training problem embedded in this. As Mobileye says, there are a lot of driver decisions that are common, but wrong. The famous example is rolling stops, but also failing to slow down for conditions is really common.

It wouldn't shock me if they don't have nearly enough training samples of people slowing appropriately for visibility with eyes, much less slowing for the somewhat different limitations of cameras.
That one I have seen, and it is grand. I live in Illinois so have many options for free viewing.
The writer known as Orwell doesn't seem to have been fond of it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41887786

[He went to boarding school on scholarship, so that may have been another reason to have been treated poorly by the full-fare students?]
What numbers? Who’s measuring? What are they measuring?