skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's an irrelevant implementation detail. This is for a live call. You are streaming video at the same time, so there's no point in worrying about idling.

I'd even say that it's a good example for others, because the equivalent code with the event loop would be slightly more complicated (maybe 5 more lines?). Striving for "doing things right" when the wrong thing is perfectly appropriate would be a bad example.
That is seemingly such an absurdly high number to get a nuclear planet up and running.

Is the majority of that cost dealing with regulatory and legal nonsense that stems from the anti-nuclear hippy groups and laws they got passed in the 60s and 70s?
https://archive.is/fdSXf
You need to, in general, run the build for compilation databases to actually work anyways. Consider the following cases:

- headers generated during the build: tools may find the wrong header or fail when the header isn't found
- generated sources: does the source file in the database even exist yet?

For those cases, one still needs to consider the "out of date" situation where a previous build left an old version around. This is something tools can't really even know today.

Beyond that, modules present an issue. The command line doesn't have any indication of what `import foo;` means to the TU in question (and in CMake's case, the file which does tell it that information is build-time generated anyways). Even if it did, the BMI may be in an incompatible format (e.g., using GCC for the build, but using `clang-analyzer` on the database) so the tool needs to go and make its own BMI. I gave a talk at CppCon about "build databases" which is basically "compilation databases, but consider what it means to support modules". (The video isn't available yet.)

I'm also working on getting a paper on them through ISO C++'s SG15 (Tooling) for proper specification.

FD: CMake developer
"Ideally, the heavy steel mills near Lake Michigan will produce minimal heavy-metals-laden effluent"
The typical reaction is I think supported by an efficient markets pov - in other words this is dumb, we know it’s dumb, but market failures make it look to the owners of capital that it’s a good investment

1. There is too much money in the world for the investments (Massive QE post 2008 and post covid). Hence people with money want returns on tokens that say 10 dollars in the front instead of say 5 dollars

2. The externalities of nuclear power are not properly priced in (see Chernobyl)

3. The price of tax compared to services received for wealthy is again out of whack and so any investment looks good because the whole chain is not paying enough tax

All in all, I believe in efficient markets and price mechanisms - I just also believe people with power and influence bend the markets to their own needs and guess what they stop being efficient - hence the need for strong governments (not strongman governments)
> Is that majority of that cost dealing with regulatory and legal nonsense that stems from the anti-nuclear hippy groups and laws they got passed in the 60s and 70s?

One part this, two parts the economics of a novel technology platform being deployed in a large size, three parts American labor costs and inexperience with megaprojects.

Similar to why we can't build ships [1]: high input costs, notably materials and labour, and a coddled industry that is internationally uncompetitive. With ships, it's the Jones Act and shipyard protectionism; with civilian nukes, it's misguided greenies. (Would note that we're perfectly capable of nuclear production if it happens under the military.)

[1] https://open.substack.com/pub/constructionphysics/p/why-cant...
I want to add to this that I routinely see solar plants compared on a cost basis with other forms of energy by using the nameplate capacity.

Which is, hmm. Rather than impute motive, since I'm sure motives vary, I'm going to talk about why this doesn't work. Classic heat plants (coal, diesel, nuke, doesn't matter) get around 90% of the nameplate. Specifically they're running 90% of the time, and producing at the full capacity while running. That percentage is called the capacity factor.

Because for classic generators the capacity factor is high (hydro can vary a lot based on water available in the reservoir), nameplate capacity, which is what the plant yields under ideal conditions, is usually what we talk about. The problem is that the nameplate capacity of solar is what you get on a perfectly sunny day, with the sun shining directly on the panel.

What you want in order to assess cost is the nameplate capacity multiplied by the capacity factor, which is the averaged amount of power you can get out of the plant given real-world conditions. For solar, this can push 30% in an ideal location like Arizona, and be as low as 13% in a not-ideal location like Minnesota. Wind can push 50% capacity when well installed, but it is intermittent in an even less predictable way than solar. If the wind stops in the middle of the night, all wind and solar generation put together is bupkis.

We need nuclear. We could do without all of the other carbon-free electrical generation by use of nuclear energy. I don't think we should, mind you, solar in particular has a big advantage in that it's just about the only generating source which comes in small modules, so we can chip away at generation by adding whatever's affordable and build up over time.

But next time you hear that solar is cheaper, see if you can check the numbers and determine if the claim is being made on the basis of nameplate capacity. If it is, multiply that cost by four.
Could a non-black person even present a paper on afro-textured hair, without being subject to the vicissitudes of the social-justice-twitter-sphere?
Predicting pathogen mutual invasibility and co-circulation
Well yeah but Rust isn't a boring technology and C++ has
its own reasons for being difficult. The goto examples of boring are C (and Objective-C), Java, Perl 5, PHP, Vanilla JS (the browser itself is remarkably stable), Rails, Django. Just a who's who of ecosystems people don't want to program in.

Perl code doesn't work today just as well as it didn't work 20 years ago.
This is so funny
Do you mean AFT (automatic fine tuning)? This has nothing to do with a PLL-based demodulator. Older receivers with ratio detectors or discriminators also had AFT- there is a low frequency feedback path from the demodulator to the local oscillator to make this work.
I wrote this library once; https://github.com/ton/fast_int.

Removed `std::atoi` from the benchmarks since it was performing so poorly; not a contender. Should be easy to verify.

Rough results (last column is #iterations):

BM_fast_int<std::int64_t>/10 1961 ns 1958 ns 355081
BM_fast_int<std::int64_t>/100 2973 ns 2969 ns 233953
BM_fast_int<std::int64_t>/1000 3636 ns 3631 ns 186585
BM_fast_int<std::int64_t>/10000 4314 ns 4309 ns 161831
BM_fast_int<std::int64_t>/100000 5184 ns 5179 ns 136308
BM_fast_int<std::int64_t>/1000000 5867 ns 5859 ns 119398
BM_fast_int_swar<std::int64_t>/10 2235 ns 2232 ns 316949
BM_fast_int_swar<std::int64_t>/100 3446 ns 3441 ns 206437
BM_fast_int_swar<std::int64_t>/1000 3561 ns 3556 ns 197795
BM_fast_int_swar<std::int64_t>/10000 3650 ns 3646 ns 188613
BM_fast_int_swar<std::int64_t>/100000 4248 ns 4243 ns 165313
BM_fast_int_swar<std::int64_t>/1000000 4979 ns 4973 ns 140722
BM_atoi<std::int64_t>/10 10248 ns 10234 ns 69021
BM_atoi<std::int64_t>/100 10996 ns 10985 ns 63810
BM_atoi<std::int64_t>/1000 12238 ns 12225 ns 56556
BM_atoi<std::int64_t>/10000 13606 ns 13589 ns 51645
BM_atoi<std::int64_t>/100000 14984 ns 14964 ns 47046
BM_atoi<std::int64_t>/1000000 16226 ns 16206 ns 43279
BM_from_chars<std::int64_t>/10 2162 ns 2160 ns 302880
BM_from_chars<std::int64_t>/100 2410 ns 2407 ns 282778
BM_from_chars<std::int64_t>/1000 3309 ns 3306 ns 208070
BM_from_chars<std::int64_t>/10000 5034 ns 5028 ns 100000
BM_from_chars<std::int64_t>/100000 6282 ns 6275 ns 107023
BM_from_chars<std::int64_t>/1000000 7267 ns 7259 ns 96114
BM_fast_float<std::int64_t>/10 2670 ns 2666 ns 262721
BM_fast_float<std::int64_t>/100 3547 ns 3542 ns 196704
BM_fast_float<std::int64_t>/1000 4643 ns 4638 ns 154391
BM_fast_float<std::int64_t>/10000 5056 ns 5050 ns 132722
BM_fast_float<std::int64_t>/100000 6207 ns 6200 ns 111565
BM_fast_float<std::int64_t>/1000000 7113 ns 7105 ns 98847
It's the classic "Innovator's Dilemma," but as most of Adobe's clients are graphic professionals, they should make gradual changes and leave others with the bleeding edge. Workflow improvements are what most users want. Simplify common tasks or even have a "lite version" with fewer features but is easier to use for non-technical people.
Can you trick the Braun device into thinking your wrist is level with you heart?
In the monitor screenshot it occured to me that you need to choose back or front. But in most open offices you will probably need a 360 dispaly. A circle design that scrolls might work.

Also pomedero breaks are also busy. Having a break is something. Being interupted during that break is no better than being interuppted during the work part.
I could agree with you on a personal level, but not for society. Solutions to phone overuse need to scale to a large amount of people, and I doubt we can ever reach a point where:

1. "People" completely delete social media. It's already part of our lives, especially in newer generations.

2. "People" separate cameras and smartphones. Having both together is too convenient.

"People" refers to the general population, outside the tech bubble. Those interested in using less their phone, but not willing to make huge sacrifices for it. It's similar to dumbphones -- sure, they fix the issue, but not everyone can switch to one.
Won’t have to wait long before Adobe figures out the stupidest way to squeeze more money out of its customers by shoving its AI down their throats.
A common misconception. React is a library.

These are examples for React frameworks: https://react.dev/learn/start-a-new-react-project#production...

Next.js is a React framework.

If Payload is a framework or not is debatable. I think it's more like a data layer around a database for a any js app and an Admin Panel (that uses Next.js now). It might be called a framework for your own Headless CMS, because it is code first. So you basically code the panel and the data structure yourself.
Is there any message from the Flipper Zero people that this is actually their CEO? :)
I am not going to read through all 328 papers to fact check this, but I'm very confident they did do a "thorough review", that's how you start research like this. There's a bit more detail in the course that this presentation is from:

> As of 2021, we only found two technical papers that showed Afro-textured hair [Bertails et al. 2005; Patrick et al . 2004]. While some technical papers containing Black hair have started to appear since we published our findings [Hsu et al . 2023; Wang et al. 2023], these usually represent relatively unstyled hair. Some styles have started to appear in short talks [Ogunseitan 2022], but a wide range of intricate, sophisticated, and very common hair styles still lie outside the visual language of computer graphics research.

- https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3664475.3664535 (not open access, I can share it if you're interested though)

The four papers they mention here are not from SIGGRAPH. The "short talk" was from SIGGRAPH 2022, but as that phrase implies it was a talk and not a paper.
which is why no sailboats exist today....
In Soviet Union... well, I'm not actually sure what were the rules for having a dining car on a train, but all trains I rode had one. And I was very poor. So poor I couldn't always afford a ticket.

But, the system worked differently. There were "coupe" cars: the car is divided into small compartment for four people each. Each compartment has a door, a table the four have to share. Two double-decked beds. Upon request fitted with a hammock-like net that served as a crib.

Then there were "platz-kart" cars: similar idea, but six people per compartment. No doors (you could see into compartments adjacent to yours). These also had "third floor" of beds (so, potentially could house nine people, but the top floor didn't have padding and was originally designed for luggage).

Then there were "common" cars: these were usually the same as "platz-kart", but the third floor counted as a legitimate sitting place.

Then, as times got worse, the "common" class of cars became more prevalent, and sometimes these would be repurposed short-distance train cars that didn't have any place to sleep at all (just chairs, like on a plain, or wooden benches).

Any train had all kinds of cars, what was different was the proportion (as Soviet Union was headed towards its collapse, there were fewer and fewer "coupe" cars and more "common" ones). But, even in the worst times of the late 90's there still were dining cars. At some point train stuff stopped serving tea, which was the hallmark of any train travel: it came in special cups with heavy steel holders and with two bricks of sugar with the picture of train...

In my last visit to the dining car, the only dish on the menu was pelmeni (Russian-style wantons) with vinegar (a more upscale version is served with sour-cream) and vodka for dessert... Even by the standards of the day it was sad. But, hey, they still had a dining car!
Am i missing something is this text:

===

I search something

https://example.com
Then it shows me something
Example Domain. This domain is for use in illustrative examples in documents. You may use this domain in literature without prior coordination or asking for ...

===

And the rest of the page is blank white.
I’m not seeing anything else. What is everybody talking about?
The state of GNU/Linux and a case against shared object libraries
Feels like a convenient way for you to give up your own responsibility to the planet to justify not changing your impact.

I'm not saying this is you alone. We all do this, but this comment is particularly egregious for it.
What I always don't understand is: So you don't want to pay for online content, but you also want to use an ad blocker. In summary, you don't want the author or creator to get paid?

Personally, I hate ads, so I pay. I have digital subscriptions to the newspapers I read. I have YouTube Premium (because I spend an ungodly amount of time on that site).

But for people who want to do neither... what's your idea?
There are designs which avoid meltdowns, yes. Because the fuel is already molten. Like FliBe. It has a safety plug which if melts, the fuel flows in a contained reservoir and solidifies.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLiBe
Looking for constructive feedbacks on AI Voice Assistant
I have built an AI voice assistant prototype that enables users to talk with AI agents through text and voice channels. It can guide you to what you are looking for. I have placed the app on a sample shoes store just so to help guide to find the perfect shoes. Though there are a lot of unpolished aspects of the app, I'd like to hear what you feel about using voice AI for shopping online. Feel free to try at: https://shopping-assistant-s2mm.vercel.app/ . Thank you!
Since I mentioned I got the info from ChatGPT, people can decide for themselves how much they trust it.

Note that the question here is how many uniquely shaped tiles there was, not the total number.

This is interesting because if you have to manufacture and keep in stock 17,000 separate tile shapes, that will be vastly more expensive than SpaceX who, from what I hear, only uses a singe hex shaped tile everywhere.
> so we don't cause even bigger catastrophes due to instability

That isn't the only worry. If the fuel is smuggled out... https://spectrum.ieee.org/high-assay-low-enriched-uranium
> No, I'm objecting to the idea that you think you know what people would enjoy more than they do themselves, for any amount of people barring maybe close friends and family. It's incredibly condescending.

Are you calling me condescending, or wrong, or both? Both, it seems? But those are different arguments. Don't confuse the two.

When it comes to addiction, the evidence is clear that I am right.

In my opinion if it's both true and impersonal, then it's not condescending. And I'm being as impersonal and nonjudgemental as I can here. But if "condescending" is your only objection then good enough I made my point.

> It is when you already clarified it twice and it wasn't pertinent to the main point I was making, repeated above in this very comment.

When you ignore the clarification, I worry you didn't see/understand/internalize it. The levels of proof are very different, so that makes me say it again to make sure we're on the same page.
Using the existing natural gas lines for hydrogen would be pretty disruptive. I don't think most things that burn natural gas will work properly on H2. So, you're looking at a big-bang switchover, in which every appliance connected to the natural gas "grid" in the area will need replacing at the same time. In the Northeast at least, it's common for houses to use natural gas for heating, water-heating, and/or cooking.
If I could differentiate between it, then what the real person wrote or said would still have a separate value, even if the prose was bad.

Consider a normal criminal court case. Most witnesses don't know how to express themselves well neither in the written nor spoken word. Their testimony still holds value and gives important information.
Only 7% of people can accurately choose between real vs. fake AI videos
Running under capacity is considered a sin for humans. However it is fine for a server (good for burst performance!).
In competitive programing, it's clear what is a good and a bad splution, and they usualy have a set of test so people can't claim they cheated.

With real world questions, everyone can have a different opinion. Let's say you must clasify photos as dogs, cats or other. What about an apple tree? A hyena? An AI generated version of a dog with cat fur? A lion? Hello Kitty?
Do you have an example? It is set-up just for yt at the moment - would need to dive deeper into API documentation to see what else we could cook
I haven't been able to try Phosh because it's badly packaged on NixOS.

Maybe one day I'll take a stab at fixing their package.

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/278204
Remember, all you have to build is something that is 10x better, cheaper, faster and you will attract customers.
4~7 mmHg isn't going to make or break a hypertension diagnoses. 20~30 mmHg definitely.
My favorite part is how inconvenient it is to only accept "necessary" cookies.
The reading process itself is a constant that you can't filter out by doing it repeatedly. Something squeezing your arm with what feels like the force of a hydraulic press surely doesn't have any weird side effects.

Anecdata, but I always get high anxiety from not being sure if the thing is actually still working properly or if it's just gonna keep pumping itself up until it explodes in my face or something. Not exactly rational but these sort of things never are. Looney toons ass machine.
Because of the effect you’re talking about, the outdoor dew point is never above the outdoor temperature- so the air even indoors gets really dry when it’s cold outside, and you only need to keep the inside slightly warmer to keep this from happening.

I am into sailing and often sail in cold climates without cabin heat- and find that my body heat alone is enough to prevent this from happening in a small sailboat cabin.
When you click on the example.com link, it takes you to a page within the site that shows a bunch of blurred out content, a "Accept Cookie" footer. If you try to leave, it asks you if you really want to leave.
> (about $230M saved by not using SLS)

Since SLS launches are now upwards of $2B per launch by some estimates, how does this math work? Wikipedia also suggests $2 billion saved.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Launch_System#Europa_Cli...
Why does it matter if it’s written in Rust?
How do these work? You can't stay compressed all the time? Is it intravenal?
Unregulated markets trend towards brand lock-ins, proprietary parts, cheaper goods of inferior quality, etc. etc. etc. All businesses are doing this everywhere because we are running out of World for them to expand into, but any company that posts a less profitable quarter is presumed to be failing.

For centuries companies have chased the fantasy of infinite growth, and we're running out of room. If we don't start contending with this in a serious way, and applying changes to our society to accommodate it, we will only ever see more of this.
Yup, in the North West of Spain live the "Spaniard Irish", but not everybody there is blond. Eva Longoria or Gloria Stephan descend from Asturian people and are a better example representative of Asturias women. Nobody in USA would call this women celts.
Hmm, I find that the tighter the cuff goes, the lower my reading goes...
First question is; which SOC would you want to use? Is there any SOC with full mainline support that you would agree to? There is a reason Pine64 and Purism went with SOCs out of the ordinary path.
> Shared dependencies were a mistake!

Couldn't agree more.
It also hijacked my Back button for full-on effect, nice.
The cliff notes of "premature optimization is the root of all evil"
> Right, so a vehicle... and a road and a city and thousands of years of human innovation.

Or a boat, you know? Roads are everywhere and have nothing to do with any urban/rural division you feel so strongly about.

> So, congratulations, the status-quo benefits you.

I live in the city.
Yes they could. The paper we're discussing was written by non black people. Another recent paper they reference was as well: https://research.nvidia.com/labs/toronto-ai/adaptive-shells/.
Glad to see you engaging the community!

As someone unfamiliar with Furilabs, it wouldn't occur to me to go looking for a dev blog to see if you've written anything about the shell. I feel like that's information you'd want to link from the marketing page (even if the details are on your blog).
I'm always disappointed when conversations here are full of "why don't you just contribute to <other project> instead?" Have you never simply desired to do something yourself?
Easy fix. Call the person when tbey are on a call. If engaged tbey will be engaged. Then move that person to a house in the suburbs where their kids bappen to also live.
OMG, I love this. The one missing feature: a high quality camera. As soon as I saw the screen mount, I immediately thought of Continuity Camera, which is a great solution for people who want decent video without a full streamer rig.
This looks great! I've considered building a simple device with an LED matrix that looks similar to this, but could never figure out what gives the LEDs the muted look. All of the devices mentioned here (Tidbyt Gen2, Lamarca, Ulanzi, even the busy.bar) have it. Is the back-pannel just an LED matrix with a custom acrylic in front of it? How do they ensure the light from individual LEDs doesn't bleed into its neighbor?
One could say all sorts of things, sure, but that's neither here nor there. German and Polish have an identifiable common ancestor. I'd be surprised to learn of any grammatical similarities between the two that aren't also found in other IE languages.
He ended up only writing the kernel though.
> it lacked support for many features that had been around for a long time

Care to elaborate at all? Were they more like missing edge cases or absent core functionality? Not to imply that missing edge cases aren’t important when it comes to DB ops.
My specific definition: 20 years later when a retired me boots up the device, it will be able to run the calculator app without shutting down.
Just a guess but VC's probably only dislike you slightly, and that could change.