skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I wish anticheat/multiplayer was universally an option on install. I don't play multiplayer games online, and often I'd like to be able to cheat in single-player, because I'm time-constrained and would like to cut out some part of the game I find less fun. Anticheat only makes my experience worse.
Thanks for sharing. For me, I can see that DURING exercise, my blood pressure is quite raised but then drops down lower than usual in the hours that follow. However, I think that's more a function of resting HR - which remains elevated.

My particular BP scenario is good diastolic, high systolic but low rest heart rate (low 50s). My pet theory is that my heart does fewer but stronger pumps, which increases the BP. After exercising, when heart rate remains elevated, the BP is lower since the heart is doing more frequent but less powerful beats.

Just a pet theory, I haven't even discussed it with a medical professional.
Oooookay, I will bite!

After having my "Wait! That one is dead? Didn't knew that" moment, I decided enough Internet for today. Really, that site is kinda...I dunno.
Yes, Wayland compositors like cage and sway can be nested too.

That said, with both the X nesting approach and the Wayland nesting approach, you'd also need to run the screencasting application itself inside the nested server, not the just the application you want to cast. If the compositor supports a way to create headless outputs (as sway and hyprland do) that is much easier.
> Of course, nothing beats the security and privacy of username + password + TOTP (or security key), but you can't necessarily expect normal users to know to do that (or how).

Honestly, this just seems like a UX problem.

The ways this is currently implemented are often terrible, but not always. I'll give an example: I recently did a stint at "Green company" and they gave me a yubi key. They also used Microsoft for most things. To login with Microsoft authenticator I type in my username and password, click yes on the next page, and then click yes on my phone. But to use the yubi key was needlessly frustrating. First, Microsoft doesn't let you use it as the default method (hardware key). So then you have to click "use another form of authentication", "hardware key", "next" (why? Idk), and then finally you pin and tap the key. A bunch of needless steps there and I'm not convinced this wasn't intentional. There's other services I've used working at other places where it's clean and easy: username + password, then pin+ tap key (i.e. hardware key is default!).

I seriously think a lot of security issues come down to UX. There's an old joke about PGP

How do you decrypt a PGP encrypted email?
You reply to the sender "can't decrypt, can you send it back in clear?"

It was a joke about the terrible UX. That it was so frustrating that this outcome was considered normal. But hey, we actually have that solved now. Your Gmail emails are encrypted. You have services like Whatsapp and Signal that are E2EE. What was the magic sauce? UI & UX. They are what make the tools available to the masses, otherwise it's just for the nerds.
I got a Xiaomi GT3 watch for less than 40$ including shipping. it has blood pressure measuring. How accurate? I dont know. I have a normal BP, and it always shows me normal values. Whe I try it on my son or wife's wrist, it always measures a lower BP.

Anyways, I stopped looking at it, and I only use it for the looks and to show me notifications.
Because it' still a highly contentious issue. It's as if you asked a hundred years ago, "Why are these free Saturday/40hour-work week so popular"? It is an enormous power struggle, and it can only be won through determination.
do we need to have a separate syntax for schema def and values? I know zig does that, but for a config that is probably too much. Maybe use the same format all the way down and even drop keywords like struct.
I wish they were, but I don't think most readers are as diligent as you in looking for other sources.
How to Build the British ARPA
This metastudy seems to confirm everything the other commenter said:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.24247

It seems early hominids gradually went from omnivores to almost exclusive carnivores with a strong preference for megafauna - up until their prey's decline and their subsequent return to other primary nutrient sources. While exact diets are hard to reconstruct and subject of debate, there seems to be little doubt that humans hunted said megafauna to extinction, which also had a significant effect on human evolution in many ways. The development of our larger brain needed lots of energy for example and hunting provided 10x more energy per hour of effort than gathering plant based nutrients. Larger brains generally seem to trend with consumption of more energy dense foods. Our ability to store much more fat and fast for longer times than other primates also seems to have developed from the need to hunt primarily large animals dispersed over wide areas.
I've been meaning to write a longer essay on this for years, but I believe the reason for this observation is different cohorts.

Imagine you are a C# programmer just as C# 1.0 is released. C# is a fairly simple language at that time (and similar to other languages you already know), so you can get caught up on it fairly easily and quickly. A few years later, C# 2.0 comes out. It's got a handful of features, but not too much for you to absorb. Likewise C# 3.0, 4.0, etc. As long as you stay on the C# train, the rate of new features does not exceed the rate that you can learn them.

Years later, another person comes along and is new to C#, which is now at version 5.0. They are presented with a huge sprawling language and they have to learn nearly all of it at once to deal with codebases they are contributing to. It's a nightmare. They long for a language that's actually, you know simple.

So maybe they find some other newer language, Foo, which is at 1.0. It's small and they learn the whole thing. After a couple of years of happy productive use, they realize they would be a little more happy and productive if Foo had just one or two extra little features. They put in a request. The language team wants happy users so they are happy to oblige. The user is easily able to learn those new features. And maybe some other Foo users want other new things. 2.0 comes out, and they can keep up. They can stay on the train with 3.0, 4.0, etc.

They never explicitly asked for a complex language, but they have one and they're happy, because they've mastered the whole thing over a period of years. They've become part of the problem that bothered them so much years ago.

Fundamentally, the problem is that existing users experience a programming language as the delta between the latest version and the previous one. New users experience a programming language as the total sum of all of its features (perhaps minus features it has in common with other languages you already know). If you assume users can absorb information at a certain fixed rate, it means those two cohorts have very different needs and different experiences.

I don't think there's a silver bullet. The best you can hope for is that a language at 1.0 has as few bad ideas as possible. But no one seems to have perfect skill at that.
Part of the reason people don't/didn't like seeding is that many residential lines are so terribly asymmetric. If you had 100down/5up, seeding your torrent at a useful speed was often enough to degrade your connection into unusability.
It's also tamper-evident. Forks would detect the rewrite.
And I can't get my head around passkeys yet. Haven't switched to them. Haven't developed a clear model of where's my private key exactly how many of them and how to get to them if my camera or fingerprint sensor isn't working etc.
A beautiful concept. Thank you for sharing.
But this begs the same question: if mental illness really is what psychologists say it is, and if treatment is a learnable skill, then the practitioner shouldn't matter that much assuming his training was good.

But most evidence suggests that some "je ne sais quoi" has to exist in the therapeutic relationship.

In other words, Freud was right about Transference as a necessary ingredient to psychotherapy (and probably about a lot else that is still too controversial to talk about or pass IRB muster).
One of the first sites I downrank in kagi is all the fandom sites. I don't outright ban them, sometimes they're all there is, but I try and make it so any other result shows up ahead of them
Agent eval UX – inspired by GitHub diffs
Yes, made this mistake in the past.

Every project has some amount of "being quirky/different" capital. If your project is not explicitly trying to innovate, or does not for some particular reason need to be very secure, then do not spend that capital on confusing users with the login flow. You'll turn a bunch of users away and cause a whole lot of support tickets, for very little benefit. Make users only think about stuff by making it unintuitive or different if it's really worth it to your product.
AMD Turns the Screws with "Turin" Server CPUs
There's probably better figures. Internet providers themselves probably know what subscribers dropped at what times, so you'd be able to distinguish from evacuations and have a good signal as to whether it happened from power outages or key pieces of their infrastructure failing.

It would be really neat to figure out the cooperation necessary to effectively use it. Rapid damage assessment has a ton of value even if the data is somewhat unreliable.
Yes, but when "the good parts" came out, half of this list was already true.

There is a reason we ignore a good chunk of the language to be productive with it.
htgfedffvdvcvcvcv
+1. I also use Samsung Galaxy Watch (Active2) and find it to work well for me. I'm surprised more people don't know about it. I know couple of people that suffer from high BP. They showed little interest when I told them about the watch.

Regular external calibration helped me build confidence. I was suspicions if the watch worked, and how well it worked. Calibration is every month - it expires. I take 3 measurements in parallel watch-cuff, and tell the watch App what the cuff measured. I didn't mind it initially. I now find it annoying tbh. I see why Apple would like to get rid of it. Post calibration, I measure 3 times in parallel both watch and cuff to check if they match. If the difference is within 5% - then fine. In 3 years it's happened twice where they differed more and I had to recalibrate. From recollection - both times with a reason, a TV was turned on in living room.

I have the impression that BP measurements differ though the day (lower in the morning, higher in the evening), depending on activity or at rest of course, I think there maybe some seasonality too (winter v.s. summer). Measuring BP when going to the doctor once a year strikes me as a wholly inadequate. If the BP is absurdly high out of normal range - then yeah, we learn something is wrong with the patient. But in any other case - don't see what can be deduced from 1 random measurement.

To check if the calibration is important, I had my wife use the watch, that is calibrated on me. She got absurd readings. So yes - the calibration is important and is tied to the person that did the calibration. (edited to add this)
> professional training as a therapist does not produce a statistically significant improvement in ability to treat mental health conditions.

It produces a statistically significant improvement, just not with people who are already gifted at it. You can get not gifted people and teach them to be not worse than gifted. It is not much, but it is not nothing either.
I've had this thought about public transit quite often.

We're all very familiar with induced demand when it comes to widening highways and other car-centric infrastructure.

Why don't we try to induce demand on public transit? Make it cheaper, subsidize it like we subsidize roads/parking, add additional routes.
I was responding to a user saying they explicitly didn't use MKV for compatibility with players.
I thought it said "Proposal: JavaScript Sucks" and was not surprised by the number of upvotes from HN
As someone who did statistics and psychology, I'm very surprised by this take, for a few reasons:

1. Many of the early pioneers in statistics were psychologists.

2. The econ x psych connection is strong (eg econometrics and psychometrics share a lot in common and know of each other)

3. Many of the people I see with math chops trying to do psychology are bad at the philosophy side (eg what is a construct; how do constructs like intelligence get established)
> 10k candles at 120 fps seems like you could absolutely do it in JS alone

I think so too. I think everything we have is entirely possible to achieve in JavaScript but you're spot on, writing performant JS like this isn't fun and harder to maintain.

> Don't worry I'm ok without having my eyes burned out by the lack of proper subpixel AA on your fonts. :P

Fair fair. It is definitely happening, more noticeable in certain situations. :)
If you want a computing environment that lasts, open source _is_ a core item. Hardware isn't forever and at a certain point will have to change (even chips break/wear out, not to mention capacitors and other bits...)

If you can port your OS and your apps and have control over your data formats, you're in a position to adapt to change.
Except it's just not going to happen. I don't believe in the stupid propaganda (that gets repeated here almost every week) that Ukraine was manipulated into this war, by Boris or anyone else. Ukraine is entirely independent and makes its own choices.

But the simple fact is, it doesn't have unlimited control over its destiny in this particular regard, and pretending otherwise won't change that fact. It is entirely dependent on Western help at this point -- its benefactors are 1000 percent against any further nuclear proliferation, and are infinitely more concerned about that issue than they are about the borders of Ukraine, or Ukraine's survival in any other sense. They have no interest in the inevitable and far wider confrontation with Russia that would ensue from such recklessness -- and they just aren't going to allow it.
It’s not productivity, it’s instilling norms in juniors.
In 10 years time everyone will be using passkeys, not passwords.
In theory, yes, in practice, YMMV. I've never found myself in situations where I felt it was specifically worth connecting to Wi-Fi in order to conserve battery life.
I don’t trust or like the company. I expect them to drive up the premium price in the future, make it inconvenient to use multiple devices, etc. so I’d much rather steal their stuff.
He does the same redirect whenever someone links to his DNA Lounge: https://dnalounge.com (NSFW)
Take a look at eSIMs. They're crushingly convenient.
I don't think Python is special in this regard. I have the same issue with .NET/C# stack traces.

With Python, you can run your program under pdb, which will automatically enter break on exceptions, and you can easily print locals.

https://docs.python.org/3/library/pdb.html
Torrent Editor
It certainly looks that way. It's either going to be cell phone integration, or ER GLASSES(ex meta raybans). I would like to see the incorporation of a ring(real unintrusive wearable NFC I can activate or press<for presence confirmation> with my thumb by just raising my hand above the keyboard{For illustration, you ever seen guys spin their wedding band with their thumb as a twiddling activity??}).
If I had to speculate about your question, I would guess that a) there was almost no digital video to matter a few decades ago, b) there was different culture regarding digital media (or maybe I'm misremembering), trailers were more tame and there was less of them overall (I'm not from USA btw), like maybe 1 or 2 before the movie, not 5+. There were much less story based TV shows with contiguous plot, which are all the fad now. Making a trailer for Seinfeld can be done easily. Now making a trailer to say Game of Thrones will most likely involve some major spoiler (or a dozen).

So my guess answer is - the social pressure finally rose high enough that there is now critical mass of people who care about spoilers and got spoiled a few times by official media. That's why there are more posts about this. More instances of the issue multiplied by vastly bigger market due to cheap internet and streaming.
Google fought back against a crippling IoT-powered botnet and won
> How enormous are we talking?
> An impressive 8.63GB in size, a sizable chunk of all but the largest of drives.

That feels pretty hyperbolic.
"Backwards cultures have people who act backwards" is obviously a slur. That's not a close call.
Show HN: Gemma2 – AI Inclusivity for Marginalized Groups Multi-CLoud
Hey HN,
I’m excited to introduce Gemma 2 Training by The Duhart Group (TDG), in partnership with Google. This initiative is focused on training AI models that foster inclusivity for marginalized communities. By collaborating with academic partners like Harvard Dataverse, UC Berkeley, and Stanford, we leverage diverse datasets to create fairer, more empathetic AI systems.

Highlights: Diverse Data: Integrating datasets from leading academic institutions to reduce AI bias. Google Partnership: Powered by Google Cloud for efficient AI model training and data processing. Inclusive AI: Focused on addressing the needs of underrepresented groups like African Americans, LGBTQ+ individuals, and People with Disabilities. Learn more about our technical architecture is in the link provided.

http://gemma2website.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/
WASM has to call javascript to do really anything.
Yes, you bring up a good point about the other practical issue with adopting Agile. It says that the developers and the business people need to work together daily, as becomes necessary when there isn't a manager to act as the go-between, but as you point out the business people in reality just want to play golf, not become shared participants in the development process.

But, again, Agile is pretty clear that it requires special people. It was never meant for everyone. To observe it in a light where it is applicable to all organizations violates its very existence.
Agree that one does not have an obligation (first sentence) but disagree that pure individual self interest is best for society.
The size of the nestbox can be a factor as well. If the nestbox is too large for the breed of chicken you keep, it encourages them to hang out inside it, and they walk on the eggs and get them dirty.

If a nestbox is the right size, it will only be used for laying eggs (and occasional brooding).
The shareholders of X (which includes Fidelity) receive internal details because they are owners, they are entitled to that information as owners.
Don't leave extra space. Ask the question and get a "no, we don't need that", then call out the frequent specification misses when the schedule slips due to all the rework. (Or that doesn't happen and realize they might know what they are doing)

Pain like this is critical feedback for a organization. Blunting it hurts more in the long term.
(Wipes away tears of laughter) I needed that! [1] [2]

[1] just got some bad news
[2] all in all, I love working in JS when I have to, but I’ve worked in it long enough to know of at least very many of the foot guns.
I saw the band Failure live two years ago a few blocks from where I live. The lights went down shortly after we arrived and a video started playing on the projector wall at the back of the stage. It was a series of interview clips with musicians talking about the band we came to see: how transcendentally amazing Failure was, how incredible the sonic textures on "Fantastic Planet" were, how Ken Andrews is an unappreciated genius, etc. I thought that it would be interrupted after maybe 90 seconds by a loud guitar to kick the show off, but nope - we got to hear Hayley Williams and that Zonie vintner guy who sometimes sings for Tool gush about the band that we were waiting to see for _30 minutes straight_.

At one point I checked my receipt to make sure that we didn't accidentally get tickets to some sort of virtual experience or pre-release screening instead of a concert. The video eventually ended, the band came on, and they gave a great performance. I left feeling more confused than anything; the rest of the crowd's reaction ran the gamut from impassioned to dismissive.

If the art you're putting on display already has a cult following I don't see the need to drive the point home via these weird metatextual commentaries. I'm a weirdo that likes watching movies with crew commentary but I like to do that in my living room, not in a theater.
Unwashed eggs can also be refrigerated, and they last an absurdly long time that way — much, much longer than either refrigerated washed eggs or unrefrigerated unwashed eggs.

Once you refrigerate unwashed eggs, though, they need to stay refrigerated thereafter.
Seems like a trivial thing to fix though, it was a lack of will over an explicit design tradeoff. At Applet’s time there was simply no such API surface to attach to and make useful programs.
Its a piss poor article that was written to vent, but it didn't try very hard to find good psychological research. Episodic memory psychological literature is very strong, IMO, yet never gets brought up in these kinds of articles. Its always the fluffy puffy research that fuels tabloid headlines, not the research that shows, for example, differential patterns of memory strategies over child development, or the contributions of context to recognition memory, the differences between recollection and familiarity processes supporting recognition memory..you know, all the stuff that is not flashy for tabloids, but is real psychological science.
Dr. Charan Ranganath was a member of my dissertation committee who recently wrote a wonderful book about memory and gave some really fantastic interviews. For example, on Fresh Air: https://www.npr.org/transcripts/1233900923
Now yes, some of this is informed by neuroimaging and neuroscience spanning human and animal models, but also lots and lots of behavioral memory research. And the findings that are discussed are pretty reliable, shown over and over again in different ways. So, no, this article is not great. It did not do diligent research. Its a rant that focuses on specific types of research that is a small majority of the REAL field.
It’s completely different. Jwz’s is funny.
Goody for you - but I am stuck with a 512GB drive on a 2024 issued laptop (small capacity due to dAtA s3curiTy or some silliness, the defense industry is full of nonsense like that). I currently have 90.4 GB available, so this update would be consuming 10% of my available storage.
No, it’s because Musk is an evil loser. The usual types who jump on these X topics told me so.
> A function gets less readable as you have to go context switch to more and more different functions to understand what it's doing.

This is true.

A function also gets less readable every time you have to mentally translate from low-level implementation code, to a high-/human-level description of "what is this actually doing?" (e.g. `val := a[len(a)-idx-1]` - "ohhh, ok, that's iterating in reverse"). Extracting out common patterns to methods with well-known names like `Filter` or `Map` or `ForEach` short-circuits that repeated parsing.

> that doesn't save you from having to dive into each one.

99% of the time, it really does. If you can't trust something as basic and well-defined as `Map` to do what you expect it to do, you've chosen a poor library on which to take a dependency.
I think the point is that the remote employee is able to get away with it better and longer, and likely feels more empowered to due to the lack of built-in surveillence from colleagues.
I always got the impression that the FBI was more aligned with securities fraud which I think is probably the closest aligned here.
supporting Epic is one of the most shooting-yourself-in-the-foot moves you can make as a gamer.