skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I mean, those all sound like good questions. You might be a super genius, but most people who ask how to do X actually want to do Y. And if they DO want X, then those other questions about compiler and OS version really matter. The fact that you didn’t include them in your question shows you aren’t really respecting the time of the experts on the platform. If you know you are doing something unusual, then you need to provide a lot more context.
Last I checked eggs were banned both ways, so I am not surprised.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bo3PDWeHb58

As the western countries become more and more culturally Americanized, I think food standards are slightly drifting toward the American. That's just my feeling from visiting Europe every 15 years.
The Chinese could have a reusable booster before then. One of their companies is doing 10 km hop tests.
At the end of the day, it's CICO. But why do people eat more calories than replacement? I think it's pretty obvious some of the blame is hyperpalatability, which overlaps greatly with the category people call ultra-processed. The issue is that it tastes good, though, not how many times it has been transmuted.
This should be higher up. Humans split from primates (including chimpanzees) roughly 5 million years ago. Early hominids only evolved the ability to store large amounts of fat and fast for extended periods of time in the Pleistocene, less than 2 million years ago. Any study done on calorie restriction using monkeys has a serious caveat. Mice offer a much better starting point for comparing metabolic activity.
No, because you wouldn’t know if UUID algorithm was changed. It’s a completely unnecessary coupling, like tying your shoelaces together before running.
His lectures are terrible explanations and he doesn’t use professional looking graphics. Khan Academy is not a good product. My opinion refers solely to the math content.
It isn't so much religion specifically as philosophy, or a mindset.

Looking at the stoics, for example, the message is to not despair or be angry at misfortune. Such emotions are a result of the world not meeting your expectations, and are a lesson to adjust your expectations.

Rather than focusing on what you cannot change, the focus is moved to what you can.

The trendy term for this is "resiliency", the emotional quality of capability to endure hardship. That it the very first step to "changing the story", as you say. There's no use crying over split milk, but now you can take steps to avoid spilling it in the future.
> What's true for you isn't true for everyone.

That is why I said "a lot", not everyone.

Your "Nah." is not true, by your own argument.

> briefly

There is a reason I said "or minimal". That's minimal.
The mind is not the locus of peace and contentment. It is the heart.
Ask HN: Academics of HN, my partner cannot find a job
I'm looking for advice as my partner is finally looking for a full time job and cannot find one.

She has a 4.0 from an Ivy league university, got a perfect score on the SAT, did a masters internationally in a second discipline and then finally got a PhD in biology/ecology with over 23 publications and 18 as first author. She is finishing up her postdoc and needs a job.

I don't understand the field of academics, but what the hell is she to do? I'm posting her achievements above to show that she is clearly a dedicated and hard working individual, but I don't know what to do. It's hard for her to get interviews and the competition is steep. She is poised, has a great professional portfolio and is well-spoken. I'm biased, but I'm wondering what I can do to help her find a good job.

I recognize biology/ecology is different from tech, but I'm looking for advice from the academics of HN that understand the field better than myself. Her first choice is a tenure-track professorship at a good university, but the job options are sparse.
How do you maintain rapport over a long period of time? By striking it up first.
Sometimes I feel as if my life, and the life of other Transhuman kids who've grown up like me, is more or less Ender's Game writ large, without the special chosen-ness for leadership in something momentous.

In other words, I was merely a bored child playing video games, diving into this cyber world, and gradually, inexorably, it all became real around us, and now manifestations in meatspace are inextricably linked with that cyber world, which we imagined to be separate and unique.
The trades are pretty democratized as it is. Every service company I use with is hiring at all levels. Training is available. If you have to get a certificate before you start, that's a barrier to entry, but a nearby community college is likely to have classes.

The real barrier is it's a hard job, and other work is more tempting for a lot of folks.

Tech for trades either looks like a centralized dispatch service that takes 10-30% of the fees and results in a new person showing up for every job (no thanks! Once I find a plumber I like, for non emergency use, I prefer to work with the same one) or maybe something per company that helps organize appointments, scheduling, billing, and notifications about arrival times. This may reduce / eliminate office managers / answering services for busy firms, and could help improve communications for owners that have no employees; but I think it already exists.
Cool! Looks fairly consistent as well.

I wonder if this type of AI upscaling could eventually also fix things like slightly janky animations, but I guess that would be pretty hard without predetermined input and some form of look ahead.

Limiting character motion to only allow correct, natural movement would introduce a strange kind of input lag.
I read no moralizing or grandstanding in GP’s comment. It’s a valid point - most humans on planet earth will experience some form of mental disorder in their lifetime.[0]

[0] https://hms.harvard.edu/news/half-worlds-population-will-exp...
I think most people actually would, if they would cut down on other time sinks in the evening.
Faust, a compiled audio processing language
The better alternative to what?

I was describing an alternative to manufacturers not picking up the phone. I think what I described is better than simply being screwed.
Could it be an illusion because the "zoom" is a bit different? (I was screenshotting different applications).

Here's a better comparison: 11pt size for both, then importing the LaTeX output in typst (using SVG conversion since typst cannot import PDF): https://imgur.com/a/aZRx6fs

I removed the "comma" that produced different spacing, and added the missing F_n. It seems there's still some different in spacing due to the quad.

If you still think the spacing around '+' is different you'll have to add some highlight/measurements or something to convince me, because they look quite identical to me...
A pessimistic, fixed mindset take.
RE ".... If you had said yes, he covers his overhead..." Really - a overhead of several hundred dollars. Seems far fetched to me.
Again you are focusing on something separate from the point I'm discussing. It's is not a question of whether the LHC should have been built. It is also not about whether there were other reasons to build the LHC. I stated that in my initial post - and both of your follow ups have been about that. That is not the topic I (or she) is calling out.

The topic is that of science in general. Falsifiability of theories and arguments in good faith. Most specifically *one* of the numerous reasons provided for the LHC was X. Many people made that argument. That argument was false. People who made the argument either knew it was false or should have known. That is the issue being discussed. Not whether there were other valid reasons to build the LHC - or if those reasons were successful.

It's a bit of hyperbole but it's the equivalent of "lying under oath" to get a conviction. It doesn't matter if the defendant was guilty - and that they were ultimately convicted. It's not ok to "lie under oath" to try to put them behind bars. That is her argument. An expert witness either lied under oath (or was so wrong they shouldn't be considered an expert going forward). And the "courts" should acknowledge and address that. The fact that all of the other experts that all knew he was wrong said nothing is very notable. And we should really address it before that expert witness goes and testifies in another case. All if this is entirely independent of whether the defendant was guilty (which is the point you are raising).

Your argument is "the defendant was guilty, and here is all of this evidence they were guilty. Why are you picking this one expert and their evidence?". And I'm saying it's not about whether the defendant was guilty. That expert is being called out because either they were extremely wrong to the point they shouldn't be an expert, or they knowingly gave false testimony. And in both cases, the other experts in the room who as well knew it he was wrong all remained silent - and did so likely because it benefitted them.
Could you surround your components with gamma-shielding materials and get away with off-the-shelf parts deeper in space?
The Consensual Killing of Sharon Lopatka
That's great, really shows how they are "threading a needle" on the control side of things.
Yup. I use both LaTeX and Typst (although I prefer Typst when possible) and I haven't used anything other than tectonic for the past few years. It simply has everything you need included, and is pretty darn fast too.
Yeah, I definitely wouldn't trust it to replace basic physics of running, jumping, bullets, objects shattering, etc.

But it seems extremely promising for fiery explosions, smoke, and especially water. Anything with dynamics that are essentially complex.

Also for lighting -- both to get things like skin right with subsurface scattering, as well as global ray-traced lighting.

You can train specific lightweight models for these things, and they important thing is that their output is correct at the macro level. E.g., a tree should be casting a shadow that looks like the right shadow at the right angle for that type of tree and its types of leaves and general shape. Nobody cares if each individual leaf shadow corresponds to an individual leaf 10 feet above or is just hallucinated.
To answer your question directly, the benefit is that we could make something different from counter strike.

You see, there are these things called "proof of concept"s that are meant to not be a product, but instead show off capabilities.

Counterstrike is an example, meant to show off complex capabilities. It is not meant to show how the useful thing of these models is to literally recreate counterstrike.
That doesn't sound like soft or hard wrapping, though, that sounds like semantic wrapping, which is a separate concept entirely. With semantic wrapping you put each sentence (or similar) on a new line, which helps with diffing. But if that sentence runs over e.g. 80 characters, you still need to decide whether you're going to hard wrap or soft wrap that sentence. And in the inverse direction, if you don't do semantic wrapping, you'll have similar issues with diffs regardless of whether you use hard wraps or soft wraps.

So I think that's a good argument for doing semantic wrapping of code and text (I guess semantic wrapping for code is just not writing everything in one long line separated by semicolons), but once you've put in semantic line breaks, you still need to decide how to handle text that spans multiple lines.
The boosters were not (or at least not with the quick turnover and lower costs like the ones from SpaceX)
To nitpick: under modern analysis "future" is not a tense in English: the future verb "will" (or "shall") behaves much more like "can", "may", "must" and so on - they're collectively called modal verbs, i.e., in English future is a mood.
I think this is the key though really, and what peeves me the most.

NextJS is fine to self host if you don't need any of the features that actually make it worth dealing with all the additional complexity.

Essentially if you want any of the special sauce you have to host on vercel, or use opennext guides to build equivalent infra.

Its just not worth the complexity for me to use.
This is why I don't wear a smart watch. My phone is always on silent. Sometimes i Ieave it in a different room. There's nothing good on here. 99% of notifications are just trying to sell me something or bad news. Go do something you enjoy and put down the devices, the notifications will still be there in the morning. That is to say, dedicate a block of time for that stuff if you must, but otherwise tune out the Internet.
Parachutes give little or no control over where and how the rocket lands, are unreliable (unfurling fabric behaves chaotically; modern spacecraft still don't have 100% reliability on their parachutes), and are surprisingly heavy.

Wings and landing gear are useless extra weight during launch, and excess weight on the booster has a super-linear reduction weight delivered to orbit. (the Tyranny of the Rocket Equation)

During the 1960s, NASA investigated using inflatable Rogallo Wings (basically hang gliders) to land the Gemini capsule. It worked fine, but was more complicated than parachutes, and re-use was not one of the goals of the Gemini or Apollo programs.

None of those give much margin for error on landing. Without any kind of propulsion, there's no option to come to a hover or do another go-around if the landing isn't going well. Space Shuttle pilots had to do extensive training in simulators for the landing because they only got one shot at it during the mission.

Propulsive landing doesn't require any hardware that isn't already on the launch vehicle, only a little excess propellant. (And it is a small amount; Super Heavy is like a soda can that's full of liquid at launch and only has a swig at the bottom during landing.) Propulsive landing gives Falcon 9 and Super Heavy the ability to overcome wind and other weather conditions to make pinpoint landings. Engine throttling gives Super Heavy the ability to hover, so it has a huge margin for error when coming in for a landing.

Super Heavy could have had legs, like Falcon 9, but it has such a huge payload capacity that they can simply choose to always launch with enough propellant to come back to the tower, and it saves a lot of flying weight and complexity by simply not having them. The arms on the tower can be massively overbuilt to ensure however much reliability SpaceX wants.
If you’re in New York, the Billion Oyster Project [1] throws an annual all-you-can-eat oyster fundraiser every September that is among my favourite events in the city [1]. (The shells are used as substrate for new reefs.)

[1] https://www.billionoysterproject.org/
IMO vitest is much better than Jest when it comes to TS support. It just works out-of-the-box.
Cline: Autonomous coding agent right in your IDE
Sometimes… the baffles break off, and then become surfboard projectiles inside the tank.

More fluid dynamics
Hm fair point. Rudeness is actually a sign of humanity. Like that one black mirror episode
there is a really interesting space between queries and prolog which includes mundane junk like encoding and rendering and data formatting changes that benefits in evaluation from having less power but maintains the lovely expressibility and analysis that we get from 'real' logic programming.

there's lots of exploring left to do
It's true. Photos were staged too, remember the viral news clip of the reporter bracing himself against "hurricane winds" and then in the background someone strolls normally across the picture.
> And crossing a 50ft+ wide intersection of a 40mph road (which means people drive 50mph) is daunting even for adults, and simply not advisable after the sun goes down.

At least here (California) those intersections have stoplights and pedestrian crossings, so the width and moving speed of the road are not relevant. The cars will be stopped when you cross by walking.

I don't remember exact age but certainly before kindergarden age my child (and all the neighborhood friends in that age range) knew how to operate the pedestrian walk buttons and cross safely.

I fully agree it can be nicer walk when you don't have to cross a larger road. But at the same time, the difficulty of doing it is often greatly overstated. Press button, wait a bit, cross. Done. This is not in the top-100 things I'd like to see improved in society.
(I did an earlier attempt at this with a "ok, longer conversation" ... and then did a "well, what if I just asked it directly?")

https://chatgpt.com/share/670bfdbd-8624-8011-bc31-2ba66eab3e...

I didn't realize that it had come that far with the delegating of those problems to the code writing and executing part of itself.
Self-documenting code is one of the worst ideas in programming. Like you, I've had to work with teams where my PRs would be blocked until I removed my comments. I'm not talking pointless comments like "# loop through the array" but JSdoc style comments describing why a function was needed.

I will no longer work anywhere that has this kind of culture.
Eh, also doesn't go as far, which forces higher deployment densities, which helps.
That's right. The whole thing is open source -- just, since it's hard to make any money from open source, they made the online editor (which is pretty good BTW)
Note that the energy of 3% of the propellant (~100 GJ) could theoretically get the empty booster (100,000 kg) to a little over 5000 km/h if properly applied.
ClassicPress – The CMS for Creators
SpaceX launches Starship rocket and catches booster in giant metal arms
Also, if you're going to use firebase (don't, you don't need the scale for your 10 MAUs), you should secure it: https://env.fail/posts/firewreck-1/
Gta 5 has everything Vice City has and more. In the Doom AI dream it's possible to shoot people. Maybe in this CS model as well?

I think the model does not have to know anything about the functionality. It can just dream up what is most probable to happen based on the training data.
It's not just the overhead of showing up, it's the opportunity cost of not doing contiguous hours at a bigger job. It's very difficult to fill up a day with 45-minute jobs all over town, so he's basically working part-time if he takes a small job.
Compare 300 Microphones
> What the f is going on in this

Genuinely curious if you find an answer.

My first thought was nuclear anxiety; it’s nice to feel like we have a secret shield in space. Then I saw Trump talked about it, so my current hypothesis is the partisan parroting that happens on both sides. (Or if someone doesn’t like military spending, maybe it’s an anti-Musk thing?)

That said, the three accounts that have been posting about it seem to really like this topic [1][2][3], so maybe it’s a niche thing. They all seem to really like one Reddit thread.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=forgot-im-old

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=tbone902

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=georgeg23
> The world hates everything we produce -- our food, our movies, our culture -- but they end up consuming it in droves. They complain that it has no taste, and they're right

I think it is even worse for people who live in US.

"American" food is different outside of US. For example there are norms in most countries for meat, so the "beef" burger has more meat. We have less limitations on allergens, so we can add peanuts for a taste. Also foreign Coca-Cola has proper sugar, not corn based fructose (Mexicoke). I can never eat in US, even chocolate tastes like vomit!

As for cinema, only good stuff is released outside of US. There is no oligopoly in cinema, you get way more diversity in movies. Some countries have censorship that removes some type of scenes. And garbage TV shows, are never released on foreign markets.
The “attention economy,” defined.

It’s why sensory isolation is valuable.

Shut out the world and hear what’s being drowned out by the mad scramble to control our attention…
Hm, that does not solve the issue in TFA and I'm not sure it consistently works like you intend:

$ node -e "process.stdout.write('@'.repeat(128 * 1024)); process.stdout.write(''); process.exit(0);" | wc -c
65536

You want to use `Stream.finished`:

$ node -e "const { Stream } = require('stream'); s = process.stdout; s.write('@'.repeat(128 * 1024)); Stream.finished(s, () => { process.exit(0); })" | wc -c
131072

https://nodejs.org/api/stream.html#streamfinishedstream-opti...

If this helps you, consider bothering your infra team to look at opening access back up for tor IPs (;
How ludicrously blind are the heirs who collect dividends on Oracle stock to how good they have it?

I guess the workers doing the work and creating the wealth are lucky that Steve Jobs, Eric Schmidt etc. illegally conspired to do wage-fixing so that they and the heirs they work for could get more of the wealth that others created.
No doubt that discord has struck a good balance. Much better than GitHub imo. Both for maintainers to get a soft understanding of their users, and equally beneficial for users who can interact casually without being shamed for filing an issue the wrong way.

There’s some weird blind spot with techies who are unable to see the appeal. UX matters in a “the medium is the message”-kind of way. Also, GitHub is only marginally more open than discord. It’s indexable at the moment, yes, but would not surprise me at all if MS is gonna make an offensive move to protect “their” (read our) data from AI competitors.
I don’t know why you are getting downvoted but I’m guessing that a lot of people don’t know about/understand that undetectable = untransmittable. It is generally seen as safe to have unprotected sex with someone whose viral load is suppressed to the point of being undetectable. Of course you need to believe that’s the case, informed consent is still important, and it’s probably a good idea for the negative party to be on prep, but the fact that the likelihood of transmission is so low if someone is undetectable is widely accepted in medicine and widely known in the LGBTQ+ community at this point.
The AI will probably start relying more on twitter and instagram videos posted by people allegedly on the scene, trascribing quotes and fabricating a story.
These folks are much more important and skilled than your typical software engineer at a FAANG employer. Kudos to them.
They do this every launch unfortunately. Youtube seems completely inept at stopping them. They make enough money to hire hundreds of thousands of fake accounts to subscribe.
You've got a lot of responses on the difference of reusability, but the shuttle was also more expensive because it had to carry a lot of capabilities with it every time. If you were launching a satellite, you were carrying along the crew compartment and a couple astronauts. If you were bringing a few astronauts to the space station, you brought a cargo bay. And in either circumstance, you brought big wings. Starship can be filled with all cargo. And if you're just changing crew on the ISS, you could... not use Starship and launch a Falcon 9 instead. One of the mission profiles required by the Air Force for the shuttle was that it be able to rendezvous with a satellite, put it in the cargo bay, and return to Earth, all under 2 orbits and along a path that avoided flying over the Soviet Union, which required a rather large turn in-atmosphere to make it back to landing on the west coast.
Imagine the number of amazing space telescopes that we are going to get! When it's cheep to launch a 10m diameter object into space, so many possibilites open up.
Startups Build Defensible Moats – Real-World Examples