skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's also meant to make it (somewhat) easier to apply various GPGPU filters and scalers before encode or after decode, like HDR tonemapping. The OS usually has some method to do this while keeping the data in the GPU VRAM by passing a handle from one API subsystem to another but if it never leaves Vulkan you don't have to worry about getting that right.
https://www.dictionary.com/e/slang/turn-down-for-what/

> At its core, turn down for what is a phrase used to promote having a good time. The phrase itself implies that there is no reason to turn down and stop partying.
Forking is probably the only way that efforts from previous devs of Godot doesn't get ruined for nothing. I hope either Redot or other fork would succeed.
It’s on the forms SH01 for new share allotments. Then look for the number allotted and the amount paid (per share), and the total funding is the number allotted multiplied by the amount paid
I'm confused about your point RE: infomercials et al - that's poor quality "content" that's been proliferating for, as you say, more than 50 years.

Is that not the work of commercial creative workers? Did it not exist pre AI? There's an argument to scale, certainly, but the idea that "things were better in the past before these <<new technologies>> came out" is generally a suspect argument.

To your broader point - new tools for creating creative work come out all the time. Did we suffer greatly at the loss of image compositors when Photoshop arrived? On the flip side, did digital art gut painting and sculpture? Isn't this just another tool for creative expression?

Art is a way of seeing, not a way of creating. I don't think the technology is taking that away.
Only reports I’ve seen mention being blocked in twitter.

If that’s a thing you care about that deeply you probably should be blocked.
I bet you are just the type of square who thinks that U+1F346 represents an eggplant.
I am experimenting with concepts to address the question: “how do you get people to socialize outside their houses?” which prompts all sorts of additional interesting questions around building anticipation through paralocal auditory broadcasting, environmental profile sharing, seeding location-based experiences, and so on. Consulting pays the bills, but this is a fun diversion.
I bet the hardware will take a bit more - the script could be just something like https://github.com/loiccoyle/shazam-cli running every minute and, when there's a valid result, upload to your backend/Sheets API/Telegram bot etc
I disagree.

There, now we both have an opinion.
Show HN: Long-form podcast with ChatGPT as a guest (advanced voice mode) [video]
> It turns out that the larger these models get, the more unexpected emergent capabilities they have, so I'm mostly in the camp of thinking AGI is just a matter of time and resources.

AI research has a long history of people saying this. Whenever there is a new fundamental improvement, it looks like you can just keep getting better results by throwing more resources at it. However, eventually we end up reaching a point where throwing more resources at it stops meaningfully improving performance.

LLMs have an additional problem related to training data. We are already throwing all the data we can get our hands on at them. However, unlike most other AI systems we have developed, LLMs are actively polluting their data pool, so this intitial generation of LLMs are probably going to have the best data set of any that we ever develop. Of course, today's data will continue to be available, but will loose value as it ages.
Comments like this worry me that HN is being dragged down with the wider culture wars and truthiness that’s destroying all that we have. I would hope for better in this forum.
Steam Link did not use SteamOS.
I dont think they would want to, not to the same degree.
As an Asian who definitely has no family cookbooks to fall back on, It definitely is a project to get things written. It's a tragedy that knowledge passed down for generations get lost because inbetween generations placed no value in cooking.
Permission now required to take subreddits private
You're downvoted but Penrose has really deteriorated indeed, he's way out of his field of expertise nowadays. It's not science, the people downvoting you are probably not scientists and need to think again about who they trust.

The original article makes huge leaps from quantum effects in Microtubuli to consciousness with no real science in between.

Here is a real scientist on this mumbo jumbo [0]. Please don't take any of that "medicine should interact with your body on a quantum vibration level, a rock can be medicine"-crap, which is the category that TFA we are discussing falls into.

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1wqUCATYUA

"My brain tells me my brain is special, and my brain is an excellent measurement device of specialness! Now all we need is science to prove my brain was right about my brain! After all: Quantum mechanics is weird. Consciousness is weird. There must be a relation!"
Valve could offer their own device snapshotting/versioning, and frankly it may not even be a real issue since the device can just be reinstalled with the "factory image" at worst.

They have been putting a lot of work into upstream packages to provide the Proton compatibility, and they'll likely want to keep getting those packages into users hands as quickly as possible.

For fast moving development in this space, it makes sense to have a base of packages that aren't outdated right out of the gate.
> If I'm going to screw up, my defaults are set for errors of commission.

There have been times in my life where I said the same.

> I'm not going to live some meek life terrified that someone might take offense at my over-reach.

This isn't about that. This is about the wrong assumptions people make, much more easily than they realize, based on someone speaking knowledgeably of things very far beyond their own experience. Those assumptions easily motivate harmful behavior.

> There's a vibe in some related comments that suggests that the proper way to manage your work affairs is to interact through some narrow "proper" API, in which nothing is sought nor proffered, that we exist to each other as callable services only.

This is a cold and mechanistic view of the thing. I would rather say that some relationships more easily bear personal intimacy than others, and a basic aspect of human social competence lies in knowing which are which and avoiding the imposition of undue strain on those relationships that can't support it.
How one Software Engineer Outperforms 138 – Lichess Case Study [video]
There is a decentralized version of this, too:

1. Each party shares an encrypted string whose plaintext starts with, "I'm being honest about my key."

2. The parties share their keys and decrypt everyone else's strings.

3. The strings are concatenated and hashed to produce a number that no party can bias.

This is a formalization of rock-paper-scissors, a protocol for generating fair random numbers that we may have used as kids.
Probably a random delay to avoid being located
If you are in the UK there are 2 incredible collections of ancient and medieval weapons and armour. The Royal Armoury (Leeds) and The Wallace Collection (London). Both are well worth a visit. Some of the armour is a work of art. I heard that NASA studied some of the late medieval armour to get ideas about how to articulate space suits (citation required).
Yeah, that makes sense. I've only had fullstack web dev jobs using node, thus the phrasing but you're totally right.

I use the ts-rs crate, which adds a derive(TS) macro for types in rust and generates typescript types. It works so far but my side projects are only medium sized. But I'm sure there are other options too.
A huge number of people are 60lbs or more overweight and they still get around fairly well.
Yeah not a joke. Straight from the W24 batch page... I'm sure these weren't even the most absurd.
macOS Sequoia is certified to Unix 03
> Same concept

Unfortunately it looks like Wallabag has the same fundamental issue of treating links as primary entities and scraped content as additional metadata that I described in the first article linked in the parent comment.

Especially when it comes to long form articles which cover multiple topics or are by their nature inter-disciplinary, it is essential for highlights or slices of content to exist independently of their source, while retaining their source as metadata, and allowing them to be linked independently (via tags, collections, feeds, titles etc.) to other slices of content (ie. commentary on the same article).

Archiving is an important step forward though, especially for a self-hosted solution, and especially after so many people have been burned by Pinboard's failure to deliver on its archiving promises for a paid product. I ultimately took a different approach to this and instead of maintaining my own scraping/archiving product, built an integration with the Wayback Machine[1].

[1]: https://lgug2z.com/articles/notado-07-2023-update/
Straight out of the Saul Alinsky playbook: "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."

The problem with your assertion is that you don't understand the rule book ( Murder is not the same as capital punishment.), and you have nothing for contempt for the said rulebook.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dikembe_Mutombo
AFAICT, as much as YC was a child of their time, they (and PG) were also one of the parents of our current time.

I'm guessing it was inevitable that Wall Street would take over the field, and turn it into a machine.

And therefore it was also inevitable that people who, in the past, would've gone to Wall Street, now would flow into the space, and take it over.

But YC did put their own spin on that, in which the traditional affluent-family, prestigious-school kids could also be computer nerds.
> Yes useEffect is also a huge complex pain point

We have a rule of thumb in our projects: if you use useEffect directly in application code, it is a probable sign that something is wrong with your code, like you're working on a wrong level of abstraction. Almost every direct use of useEffect is better solved with some standard hook from a popular library (like react-use or whatever you like — there are plenty of them).

Like, binding event listeners? useEventListener

Network/async calls? useAsync

timeouts/intervals? useInterval, useTimeout

And etc. etc.

useEffect is really a low-level building block for library code and we rarely use it directly, as it is unsafe and hides the original intent. Much like `new` and `delete` in C++ — you don't use it directly, there are smart pointers. Library hooks are your safe smart pointers over useEffect.
> What other machines are out there like this?

Quite a few.

* Feonix 256

* Commander X16

* ZX Spectrum Next

* ZX UNO / ZX DUO et al.

* Chloe 280SE
> Experts have stopped measuring ice on some glaciers because there is none left.

That is far worse than I imagined it to be. Quite alarming.
That's not the case in Holland; with soy milk costing 0.89 [1] and cow milk costing 0.99 [2].

[1] https://www.ah.nl/producten/product/wi565765/ah-terra-planta...

[2] https://www.ah.nl/producten/product/wi450534/ah-houdbare-hal...
The point of my comment is that the alleged shadiness is largely irrelevant, so I'm not sure what you response is directed at.
After one meeting with her doctor, they gave my daughter antidepressants a the class of drug that’s meant to be taken for life. She was just an angsty teenager during covid.

She didn’t take them, shes fine, but yall are the devil frfr

Admit this: if you go to a doctor and say anything about the inside of your head that makes them uncomfortable you’re getting a chemical lobotomy immediately
Admittedly I have little knowledge on the Windows feature's functionality but my problem with that is that I want to choose whether or not something like this is happening on my computer and have control over it. I barely trust Microsoft and Windows anymore as it is but it's a somewhat-necessary evil in my case. I don't trust them to record my data and actually keep it local to me and I want to actively find software to do it not have them auto install something and have full control over the data.
Being downvoted for tone, I guess, but the "remote influencing via waves" is _the_ classic delusion common to a lot of psychotic disorders.

The poster needs to seek actual help.
A question that has probably been answered, but...

In a hits business, does quality picking matter? You want to avoid adverse selection, but beyond that - isn't it just about scale?
Bible. Open random page, the verse that you spot first is your answer.

Try this once a week.
A 99% probability of winning is a gamble I would take any day.
So you can retire in 7 years, right? https://www.mrmoneymustache.com/2012/01/13/the-shockingly-si...
I love trail running. Nothing beats it. I tolerate running on streets but I don't love it the same way. Something about the trail experience gets an additional few parts of my brain engaged in a way that takes it from "i generally like running" to "whee!". Of course, I also like hiking and I love long-distance hiking, so maybe it's just hitting the same buttons.

Which isn't to suggest that it's really about trails as much as it is that there are a lot of different ways to approach it that might work better or worse for other people.

I've never had a marathon I didn't have some amount of misery in. Though I did have one half-marathon that was basically just pure awesomeness: I ran the atlanta half marathon, which I'd planned to race pretty hard, but got injured. So I flew down there, met up with my friend, and we decided to just run it as a training run. Heck - I went to the port-a-potty as the starting gun fired, since the lines were too long. Started in the back, spent the entire race passing people, and decided in the last 3 miles I felt good enough to go fast and dropped down to something close to race pace for them and enjoyed the hell out of it. Didn't come anywhere near a PR, of course, but it was a memorably fun run -- good company, nice scenery, good slow warmup, and no pressure at all on myself. And kinda good for my ego since we spent literally the entire time flying past people who looked not very happy to be there. :-)
It looking absurd was a key element in the creepiness factor, because it drew attention to how you knew someone else was recording you.
Yes, it’s running in a web worker. It still has access to the browser, so running code in the worker has the same privileges as regular workers. The only communication with the main thread is via socket messages.
Sounds interesting! Do you have an example project? It seems to be quite opinionated.
50 miles in a day is still impressive, but was it uphill or something? 30 minutes a mile seems more like walking?
Testing NotebookLM from Google AI
I will note this is slightly less an example of "AI generated" and more an example of "AI transformed". This takes existing, written by human documents or articles and transforms them into a podcast. Based on what you've written here, this shouldn't necessarily be in contradiction with your values, since you're still getting thoughts from other humans, and you can still pay money to the humans who made the original article, etc.
Is a Chat with a Bot a Conversation?
https://archive.ph/nTg3h
Correct, this does happen in every industry. But industries are not created equal. Some are really important, and some are just kind of there.

A kid not getting a toy is sad, but it's not the end of the world. However, healthcare is literally life or death. It makes complete sense to single out healthcare.
> I don't want to learn magic that I don't understand without reading the documentation (useState, createSignal et al).

Really now. Most devs who think to themselves "man I wonder how useState works internally" will arrive at the logical and correct answer within seconds. It's not complicated or magic. There are bare-bones implementations of react hooks (-ish) with a couple hundred lines of code. Implementing a basic "useState" and "runFunctionComponent" is easier than most third-semester CS assignments.

If that's the bar for magic, I'm surrounded by 20th level Warlocks coming up with new Eldritch Invocations for fun over breakfast.
i realised this too late. and then noticed -- the type of founder they let me. for us the unwashed masses, who are blue collar coders who went to state school. we're just filling up rejection numbers.

yet the arbiter of what determines who succeeds is not YC but the market.
Honestly, I hate X/Twitter specifically for this - the click/rage bait cesspool that it has become in the past year after content engagement became monetized.

Every other day, or at least every week, there is a new topic that everyone piles-on rage and hate to - even accounts that have nothing to do with the topic. This is because eyeballs make users money from X - so getting any audience possible, and getting them inflamed enough to engage is the point.

Even worse, the algorithm is gamed such that the latest rage is pushed to every other users eyeballs, resulting in a constant stream of hate in your feed.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-10-07/crypto-my...

They're not counterfeiting Bitcoin, just the means to prop up it's value. The big difference is the printing of Dollars is open and auditable.
I'm extending Postgres with the GraphBLAS/SparseBLAS APIs for sparse and dense linear algebra operations directly in SQL with OneSparse. Like JSON/JSONB did for unstructured data, OneSparse does for matrices, vectors and linear algebra optimized with the SuiteSparse JIT compiler to target dense and sparse kernels for CPUs and GPUs.

https://github.com/OneSparse/OneSparse
Have you seen the latest YCombinator batch?
And because they use crap alloys and their forging technique is crap. Customer demand drives the quality of the product. A thousand years ago, the customer demanded lightweight, durable, sharp tools, in order to survive their profession. Today, they just want something that looks and feels cool. (For comparison: a Renn Faire sword sells for $200, and a traditionally-made Japanese sword costs as much as a car)
I wouldn’t really put AlphaProof in the came category as o1, Claude, or llama.

It was trained to generate text in the lean language (https://www.lean-lang.org/) which is specifically used for formal proofs.

It’s not a natural language model.

Source: https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/ai-solves-imo-problems...

Google seems to mainly be playing the game of more specialized models (AlphaGo, AlphaProof) with general training methods (AlphaZero)

I do think it’s kind of funny that they mention AGI in that article, but the model is specifically not general.
wow so much latino la el musica
We've built something like this at Helpjuice.com - we call it Swifty AI Chatbot. It's pretty cool to see companies that are building a completely open platform that works with all. Nice work folks!

Upvoted – looking forward to supporting you guys more
We're working on it. Currently we support exporting to CSV. Here's the open issue around it https://github.com/quadratichq/quadratic/issues/1154 if you want to follow progress.
I appreciate the time you took to write this all out (both the article and your response here). In particular, this line from the article resonated with my own experience over the last couple of decades:

> This particular setup—viewing DE as a very technical, general-purpose distributed system SWE discipline and making the people who know best what real-world scenarios they want to model—makes our setup work in practice.

The common analyst-to-DE path has some benefits for sure with respect to business-centric data modeling, but without the deep technical infrastructure investments and related support, the stack becomes a beast to deal with at scale (or just ends up being a massive cost on the balance sheet from outside vendor sourcing). You really need both verticals in order to be optimal IMO.

Of course if internally an org doesn't already have the platform/infrastructure to dogfood in the first place, this admittedly makes the proposition a bit more of a gamble.
Neither I nor you would tell people about Carl's IBS if he told us.

How would writing down what we are told change things, versus remembering it, considering what we write down wouldn't be shared with anyone but ourselves?

How about recording, considering what we record wouldn't be shared with anyone but ourselves?

How would somebody suffering from a disability such as hearing loss, vision loss, memory loss, or IBS change that? Should people with disabilities be forced to disclose them whenever they have a conversation? Does that include Carl with IBS? Or would some people with disabilities have to disclose while others are allowed to keep theirs private?
... which is what happens when you click either the link to the source which is stored as metadata or the link to the automatically archived website copy.
No one is losing sleep over a murder and career violent criminal being executed. Get real.
I'm working on a concept of a declarative configuration system for Arch Linux. My goal is to get the best 90% of what NixOS provides but with archian simplicity.

Influences: decman, Nix, Guix
Our "logical" rules of Go [1] can be translated pretty directly into Haskell (links below rules).

[1] https://tromp.github.io/go.html
A very nice article. I noticed a small typo: "resitution".
Also check Dave Bull's channel, he has been living in japan and learning woodblock printing for a long time, both as a carver and as a printer. He has a shop/workshop in Asakusa if you want to go there next time you are in Tokyo. They have both modern and old prints.

https://www.youtube.com/@seseragistudio
https://mokuhankan.com/
Two new books on John Calhoun and his rodent experiments
https://archive.ph/7VcTh
How is he wrong though? "Bad vibes" all you want but there is a reason. The golden ages are over.
They likely removed the screen entirely
Throw pandoc into the workflow, and have a new edition printed every year or three at your local print shop.
So the writes are O(N) then - to keeps reads at O(1)?
give the playground a shot and let me know what you think.

we answer 250k+ customer-facing questions/mo today for teams who really care about quality (Anthropic, Clerk, Pinecone, Postman) - we're brining that same care and high bar to our copilot for support teams.

the generative UI and conversational aspect is quite different than other copilots we've seen.
Did you criticize the turing test as being meaningless before it was easily passed by LLMs? if not i don't see how you can avoid updating on "this is getting more human" or at least "this is getting closer to intelligence" to avoid the human-bias
Those scandals are an absolute disgrace indeed, but please remember it's a very small percentage of scientists involved (I hope!).

I have to say it makes me feel bad that as soon as I identify as a biologist, I get smacked in the face with western blot scandals. My god, the damage these frauds have done to our reputation. I'm so sorry for it.
While I often feel this sadness/jealousy myself, and most probably a lot of the rage bait X replies do too (despite not admitting it) - someday they have to wake up and realize that life is/has always been that way.

Despite our collective desire, Tech is not a guaranteed meritocracy either.
Disk I/O Bottlenecks in GitHub Actions