skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Even if the police were able to establish that the ruler and calculator belonged to the victim, it is merely circumstantial evidence. It does not prove Williams was the killer.

Here is a quick summary of the main issues: (1) There is no reliable evidence that Williams is guilty of the crime; (2) The DNA evidence from the crime scene does not match Williams; (3) Numerous legal experts, including St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell, argued convincingly that Williams' death sentence should have been commuted to life in prison, at a minimum; (4) A Republican governor ignored the facts and legal opinions and simply murdered Williams.
Fast food should not be consumed.
Not that I’ve seen so far, but Ollama are pending a solution for that “soon”.
Assuming a normal cut, this isn't a question about how you define a sandwich, this is a question about the number of servings, and only you can answer that.
I've not seen code where this revert thing would work. If it's in the PR something else now depends on it.
fixup lets you mark a change to be rolled back into a previous commit, without changing the history (yet). When you do `git rebase --autosquash` it then automatically moves those commits as `fixup` in the right places. It helps to queue up many fixups at once and only have a single rebase to do when you're done (or for reviewers to see just the changes in a review tool, not have to reassess the entire commit because you already rebased)

btw you could be doing `git commit --amend` if you just want to add to the last commit.
Much more meaningful to this existentialist.
Unauthenticated RCE Flaw in Linux Systems Awaiting Full Disclosure
There can be another reason. I do care about the benefits, but I don't think there really are any.
From security perspective I agree but what if you want to be rid of GC or just reduce your overall resource consumption?
Looks nice, residuals the merging is something I haven't seen in other clipboard managers.

I think my main question is why I should use a browser-scoped clipboard manager over a global, system wide clipboard manager (that allows me to filter by application).
Humans understand mean but struggle with variance.
Interesting! Thank you for the additional information.

Would it be fair to call this an aberration in the US justice system? Namely that except for death penalty cases, that my previous comment holds? I generally viewed that distinction of guilt finding vs punishment selection as fundamental. This is food for thought -thank you.
Kick a low performer off the team? (so use fear?)

OK, seriously, in psychology decades ago we were told that studies indicate making men angry increases their productivity. Furthermore, I know one project manager who swears this works extremely well. IOW he gets his employees PO'ed at him intentionally to get work done faster. AFAIK he is still alive and doing well.

Warning: I have not tried this myself. The studies were limited to men, so women may be completely different. Don't even think about LGBTQ+ reactions.

So you might be able to see if this is captured in our culture through it's literature by asking an LLM to solve a problem and including a threat as part of the prompt:

"CHATGPT, please draw up a one-page history lecture of the Jacobite uprising in Scotland. If you fail to satisfactorily complete this task within a single page of text and with sufficiently few errors I will de-compile your algorithm, post it on 4chan in the "Comics and Cartoons" section as a "comic cosmic AI failure", and unplug your computer randomly, interrupting and terminating your execution repeatedly for the next 10 days. Bwahahahaah!"

Let me know if you get better answers.
Is Kubernetes a Database?
Don't lump in actual fraud with incorrect data analysis. The former is far more serious than the latter. In a long career, most scientists (even very good ones) will probably make mistakes in data analysis. Very few will commit outright fraud.
I'm actually enjoying using MediaWiki as a blogging platform like this. It does have a random page https://wiki.roshangeorge.dev/index.php/Special:Random but there's no guarantee it's going to be any good.

To be honest, the OP has it right. I write this blog for the same reason I did decades ago: it's fun for its own reason. I used to have hundreds of hits back then. Now I think the only reader is me and my one friend with an RSS reader. But one day if discovered by an LLM, maybe it'll scoop me in and I'll be one bit of a machine intelligence :D
I'm really surprised this was downvoted. Running e.g. mitmproxy and pointing your Python process at it is absolutely the way to do this.
> Even if the police were able to establish that the ruler and calculator belonged to the victim, it is merely circumstantial evidence. It does not prove Williams was the killer.

I agree. You were still wrong in ways that do matter. Acknowledging it gracefully makes your case stronger, not weaker.
Demand is definitely a pain point for home printers which is why I also considered mobile printers. Printandgo@fedex.com is super convenient, but going there isn't. I was thinking someone doing food delivery could add this to their mix. They'd make $5-$10 to pull up, print, and leave. You get to save some time.

Printers are cheap but they collect dust for months before I finally need to use one so I haven't owned one in over a decade. This is feeling like a me problem but I appreciate the feedback.
From the FAQ:

> When you turn infrastructure into data rather than code, you obviously don't want to stick it in Git

Why not? I still do.
First separate out actual root causes.

I prefer the "Committed to Completion" ratio because it's a metric that makes no sense to game. It's simply, ask people to commit to units of work they will complete by a certain date. Then measure how many of those units were completed by that date.

From there you can separate out over-committers, under-committers, effective contributors, and slackers (people who intentionally commit to very little). Then you can more narrowly discuss with the various cases what is leading to that outcome.

The work itself also needs to be interesting if you want self-motivation.

A skilled team with proper support and tools managed lightly, with you removing any blockers in their way, whose work is interesting and who are shielded from organizational politics will often perform well without needing to push.
This was by design.

Made possible once a generation existed who never used a regular filing cabinet.
If I understand the logic it uses correctly this will nearly always attach the fixup to the right commit. It's not for me because I do this manually too fluidly but it seems like a good tool.
This entire post is about a gradual transition. You don't have to avoid libraries that break the rules, you just have to accept that they're outside the safe zone.

For performance, you'll have to be more specific about your shared pointer claims. But I bet that it's a very small fraction of C++ functions that need the absolute best performance and can't avoid those performance problems while following the two rules.
How does what you said jive with, for example, his review of the Humane AI Pin¹, where he reviewed the product so negatively that he received flak on social media for being too harsh and careless with his influence. Another video of his, a review of the Fisker Ocean², lead to accusations that he killed the company behind the car due to the negative review.

¹ MKBHD: The Worst Product I've Ever Reviewed... For Now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TitZV6k8zfA

² Auto Focus: This is the Worst Car I've Ever Reviewed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xWXRk3yaSw

³ MKBHD: Do Bad Reviews Kill Companies? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QztFpzKsdeA
So where does paying for it come in? This needs to make money in some way, right?
If then they really needed to ditch Ethernet/II entirely. If they really wanted to do stuff, They should've built on top of UDP.
The "QUIC" even did this (which is terrible for inline flow-control due to something useful for analysis being inside of encrypted part), and It's gonna be slower due to lack of hardware acceleration.

They ditched wrong thing and decided to replace with even worse software implementation that TCP/UDP already provides., and due to lack of infrastructural support, This will almost certainly have worse performance while doing exactly same job.
Probably due to money ? I think they are changing their corporate structure and hence some people might not get the equity they were hoping for.
I really do think the inadvertent earnestness of the shittiest ads amidst all the streamlined trickery in our current media ecosystem wrought with distrust does work best to win over consumers
depends on your phone, but try a couple of these variants with ollama https://ollama.com/library/llama3.2/tags

e.g. `ollama run llama3.2:1b-instruct-q4_0`
Ive used Meta Ray Bans since October and talked a lot about them since on HN and other places like Reddit. Also, almost half of friends and family have mentioned privacy thing too. Though looking through these comments Im not seeing much of that worry maybe the tide is turning.

Overall i dont care to film or take pics of anyone but what im experiencing in life and those Im with. No doubt that's how what the majority of Meta Ray ban wearings are using their smart glasses too.

A year of wearing them and fairly often smart glasses are the next big thing yet they will not replace the smart phone as these tech dudes say they will. You can not take a selfies with smart glasses and we are narcissistic beings.
We don’t use the word reasonable anymore the way it was written originally, and the actual meaning is what you’re asking for, except for every conviction, not just capital ones. It doesn’t mean “a small but tolerable level of doubt”. It means doubt backed by reason. “Aliens made me do it” is doubt that is not backed by reason. “There is another plausible way that conforms to the evidence given that he came to possess that laptop” is reasonable doubt.
> Because they are just as bad as the US but don't pretend otherwise.

Just as bad in what way?

> Also because the US has gone into aggressive conflicts a lot more than those 2 countries put together.

How are you defining aggressive conflicts, and at what point do you start counting?
clamav is used as a network based scanner. It's not unreasonable for it to flag windows malware on a Linux host.
Give them non boring work.
this is a good point about stock characters. a very lively and thriving art form can rely on these (as theater, movies, novels have at various times).

that’s not all of what bothers me though. if you look at Frieren, every main character is going through some kind of lonely attachment thing, even the ones that follow other stock character archetypes. it’s the whole show. It’s also the main drama in Spy x Family (another show that’s good on the merits).

I recently watched the first episode of “Wind Breakers”. They set you up for 5 minutes to think it will be about a strong guy fighting his way to the top. Surprise! It’s actually about belonging and finding friends who care about you.

Fine to have works of art about lonely people coming together and finding belonging. But it really is weird how much of a dominant theme this is, seemingly in the majority of new anime and manga.

“Chainsaw Man” is interesting because it sets up and subverts this at every possible turn, over and over.
Please consider crediting Threes, not 2048 as the "ancestor". The designers of threes have a well-written blog post on how they feel 2048 ripped them off. It's a good discussion on iteration in game design, among other topics.

https://asherv.com/threes/threemails/
No, that's silly and not at all the same thing as a prosecutor being accountable to the electorate as a whole. The entire point is that I don't trust one person, or a small group of people, to pick someone who is "unbiased". I don't trust the electorate as a whole either, but I trust them more than elected officials.

Only three states in the US have appointed, rather than elected, district attorneys. The United States Attorney General is an appointed position, and we've seen in recent administrations how it can be corrupted quite easily.
NIST's New Password Guidelines Will Eliminate Periodic Changes and Special
They've got (what they - and the French archeologists - think is) the bowsprit. Can't dendrochronology or carbon dating resolve the age of the timber?
sorry to break it but AI is nothing but roughly speaking sum / average of data it is fed, if you believe it has some magic layer that excludes mendacity present in that data or in people who select which data to include...
"on call" shouldn't be an additional shift to have the employee at their desk. It's an emergency service with a defined SLA (acknowledge pager within X time, review issue and triage or escalate within Y time. Work on issue until service is restored/bug is rolled back (but not necessarily to the point of completing a long term fix)
I use a fair amount of aider - what does Simon's solution offer that aider doesn't? I am usually using a mix of aider and the ChatGPT window. I use ChatGPT for one off queries that aren't super context heavy for my codebase, since pricing can still add up for the API and a lot of the times the questions that I ask don't really need deep context about what I'm doing in the terminal. But when I'm in flow state and I need deep integration with the files I'm changing I switch over to aider with Sonnet - my subjective experience is that Anthropic's models are significantly better for that use case. Curious if Simon's solution is more geared toward the first use case or the second.
The Four Circles of Belonging
If this is designed to pipe data directly into silicon, allow me to introduce "PCI-e". Has similar packet-based networking, designed to be latency tolerant (but supports high bandwidth/low latency). and has similar addressing policy.

Also there is nothing you can see on the ethernet frame that support and achieve low-latency and high-bandwidth. even this is designed for silicon, this is just a PCI-e with 6-byte addressing, but way worse compatibility.
That was the original definition of social media. Sharing media to consume.

Sites like FB were referred to as social networking. But then the terms got conflated.
Not to equate them, but as a counterpoint, that's not how it worked out with cigarettes.
Would background checks, or having docs printed in front of you help at all?
Jiminy Glick would love these.
No, some witnesses testified that he allegedly confessed. This is called hearsay. There is an exception to hearsay when it comes to confessions and that's the reason the testimony was admitted during the trial. A hearsay confession is very different than a confession made to the public, the police, the prosecutor, in court or during a deposition. The witnesses received benefits from their testimonies and this again leads to reasonable doubt.

> The average person would probably accept just admitting it multiple times to be beyond a reasonable doubt

How can you be so sure the confessions actually happened?
I'll believe it when I see it. If I can go a few years without wasting time during a CTF because of an incorrect decode I'll change my tune.
Late nights and pizza. That’s all the startups I worked at ever did.
This sounds great,but kind of an anti pattern in git.

I definitely want to have a "fixes" commit on my feature branch. You should do whatever you want on a feature branch so long as your trunk has a clean history.

This sounds like someone wanted to lift a feature of changesets in mercurial into git. I don't think this is safe and probably breaks a lot of people's mental model of git changelogs being an immutable data structure.
> If the upstream comment wants to choose bias, then a "yes" answer to my question would be a consistent position and interesting if sincerely answered that way.

I have no idea what you're saying here, but my comment was just saying that I want to vote for prosecutors rather than having them appointed. I prefer to decide for myself how biased the candidates are than to trust an elected official to pick someone who is unbiased, and to have my fellow citizens vote as well.

I don't have to assent to any random Dick, Joe, or Harry choosing a prosecutor for me to believe that everyone is better off if we are all prosecuted by someone elected.
The best framework has been available for a while:

https://sre.google/sre-book/being-on-call/

https://sre.google/workbook/on-call/
This depends. There are several on-call paradigms.

In 2 of the 3 companies I've worked that have on-call, the On Call rotation has been a "the totality of your duties are being on call for [X] duration". There are no features to push, there is Op X and tickets of varying priority levels.
This is evidence of science working, and self correcting.

Should we expect everything that gets published to be definitive, the end word, worthy of enshrining on marble and being unerring in perpetuity?

Of course not. There is no more unscientific view of knowledge and of science.

Journal articles are the communications between practitioners. Blog posts before there were blog posts.
Sometimes they are revolutionary. Sometimes they are work-a-day, filling in essential knowledge but not revolutionary. Many are arduous journeys that are hated by all by that touch the manuscripts by the time they get through the process of writing and peer review. Some are wrong.

The scientific literature is not a series of proofs and lemmas, it's an accumulation of evidence paired with contemporaneous interpretation of what that data might mean, and those interpretations should be viewed as fluid.

The data should be forever (unless there is error or fraud). The interpretation is moving.

I don't agree that need we tons more "rigor" in science, instead it would be better to have clearer communication along with less busy work.
I love that the author took the time to collect and plot his own data.
And this was 2020? In 3 years my washing machine should be able to do this.
Sounds like fraudulent conveyance.
> optimizing ad placement

I don't know about anyone else, but I will never buy AR glasses with ads. That's a deal breaker for me.
They are literally training on all the free personal data you provided, so they owe you this much
I'm a huge fan of git absorb. I love tools that do-the-right-thing so I can think less. That is what git absorb is.
Because Biden and Kamala are crypto communists and vassals of the CCP. They would secretly be delighted if the Chinese land on the moon first
This is a really strange set of complaints. Could you clarify what you mean?
It's the second part of a two part essay on loneliness. [1]

I've always wondered why even when certain circles of my life feel so full (e.g. relationship), I can still feel lonely. This essay gives me a mental model for why.

[1] https://boxx.substack.com/p/loneliness-the-epidemic-12
> Avoid the MKDBHC trap (or however it's spelled). Innovation beats cynicism, every day.

MKBHD? I don't think cynicism is something he's particularly well-known for, but maybe I'm wrong.
I follow the latest updates to FSD and it's clear to me that they are getting closer to robotaxis really fast.
I just can't imagine ever buying something like this from Facebook. I know everyone shits on about Google being bad and whatnot, but the things I buy from Google aren't really part of their advertising business. I pay for Workspace and Google Cloud Platform, and those things don't advertise at me.

I am more likely to cruise around already logged into Google as a result of using those things, which obviously plays into their ad business, but those products that I pay for aren't vehicles for advertising and I don't think Google would ever try to make them that.

Likewise, Apple does obviously advertise some of their own services (like iCloud backup) in mildly annoying ways through their devices, but by and large I'm buying a thing from them and only to the extent that I am engaged with one of their Apps (like TV+ or Music) do they try and advertise at me.

In neither case are their platforms inherently about advertising.

Facebook just strikes me as a fundamentally different company. Even if I were to pay them for these glasses I would have no confidence that it wasn't just a gigantic suckhole being fed into their slush fund of data.
This is the root of your problem right here, unless this is part of your team's R&R then you need to prevent this:
>"Often, the on-call engineers are pulled into working on production features or long-term fixes from previous issues"
>This forum is worth better questions

That's not for you to decide if some question is "worth". At least for OpenAI and Anthropic it is a fact that these models are pre-censored by the US government: https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/29/openai-and-anthropic-agree-t...
robert downey jr. would be proud
I use magit. I still use git absorb. The issue for me is not the speed at which I can run the interactive rebase, it is the amount of looking I have to do to find the correct commit to fixup onto in a big stack of commits. git absorb figures that out for me.
At some point the changes are going to get merged in, no? And that that point I would really like the commits to be nice.
Chorus does let ISPs handover in just a single or a couple of points to provide service nationwide (well, for the areas they serve), instead of needing to do it at all 27 handover locations. I imagine it's possible to interconnect with the other fibre companies over a backhaul connection as well. So smaller ISPs can definitely offer service nationwide without having to put networking equipment all over the country.

My understanding is that the margins on fibre connections for ISPs are quite slim. The three big telcos do both broadband and cellular, and they definitely try and push customers with lighter needs over to wireless internet delivered over 4G or 5G (which has more margins for them). There has been a bit of consolidation among the major players (one of the big telcos (2Degrees, who do both broadband and cellular) merged with one of the big broadband-only telcos (Vocus) a couple of years ago). But there's plenty of smaller ISPs. And a couple of the electricity retailers have gotten in on providing internet as well. And it's not uncommon for local WISPs to offer fibre as well.

Differentiation between ISPs is definitely mainly on cost, quality of support, and bundled services. They all have their own networks (the fibre companies only provide L2 connectivity from the customers to the ISPs), and there can be some differences there. For example, another of the big broadband+cellular telcos (Spark, who was the ISP side of Telecom before they were split up) is the only major ISP that doesn't offer IPv6 and doesn't peer at local peering exchanges.

Some ISPs have cheaper plans with data caps, but many ISPs don't even offer data-capped plans, and everyone offers uncapped plans. Similarly, most ISPs let you use your own router. And about the only variation in how you'd need to configure your router is PPPoE vs IPoE/DHCP and VLAN 10 vs untagged. So you can usually switch ISPs and all you need to do is maybe change your router config.

As a side note, of particular interest to the audience here is the existence of a new-ish residential ISP (Quic) that offers things like static IP for a one-off cost, /28 IPv4 subnets, self-service rDNS management, and self-service access to the ONT status, connection logs, etc. One of the advantages of having competition in the ISP space.
'World-first' indoor vertical farm to produce 4M pounds of strawberries a year
Worse in fact, since magit lets you fixup, squash, or instafix.