skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Was a "joke" since Elon being a clown on "the specific platform". But this design is absurd since "there is already profound high-bandwidth low-latency packet-based protocol for inter-chip networking (PCI-e)" and "This is terrible to run on conventional Ethernet/II infrastructure due to lack of hardware acceleration support due to lack of checksum/etc. offloading support".

I really think there is no performance enhancement, heck even worse performance when it is being used on data center deployment until they decided to design their own switch on everything. and considering everything and the packet header is being about the size of about UDP, It seems there is no advantage of using it instead of UDP with Broadcast IP addr., Maybe in their hopes and dreams, Broadcom or other chip vendors might support their ethertype but It will be further in the future.
> This tech is cool, but there's a worrying trend of important tech companies creating larger than life PR announcements without anything I can actually get my hands/eyes on

Funny thing is a company called Micronics actually recently launched an actual Kickstarter campaign for something they planned to ship to consumers, then they decided to sell to some enterprise company instead and cancel the campaign.

So even stuff that was advertised as for consumers isn't safe from never actually happening
The simplest solution is to compensate the on-call engineer, either by paying them 2 times their hourly rate per hour on-call, or by accruing them an hour of vacation time per hour on-call. This works because it incentivizes all parties to minimize the amount of time spent in on-call alert.

Management is incentivized to minimize time spent in alert because it is now cheaper to fix the root-cause issues instead of having engineers play firefighter on weekends. Long-term, which is the always the only relevant timeline, this saves money by reducing engineer burnout and churn.

Engineers are also incentivized to self-organize. Those who have more free time or are seeking more compensation can volunteer for more on-call. Those who have more strict obligations outside of work thus can spend less time on alert, or ideally none at all. In this scenario, even if the root cause is never addressed, usually the local "hero" quickly becomes so inundated with money and vacation time that everyone is happy anyway.

It doesn't completely eliminate the need for on-call or the headaches that alerts inevitably induce but it helps align seemingly opposing parties in a constructive manner. Thanks to Will Larson for suggesting this solution in his book "An Elegant Puzzle."
> You almost always want to export in both formats

I haven’t exported CJS in half a decade. I haven’t authored CJS in a decade. You most definitely do not always want to do that.
That makes sense because the #1 reason I have had to roll back my own C++ commits is due to crashes from some dumb failure to check whether a null pointer is null. If Rust is going to prevent that issue and other similar issues of stupid coding, you would expect whole classes of rollbacks to go away.
Sincerity? I don't know. He seems to really believe in AGI and the singularity and all that, but everything else seems to be lie after lie. This article [0] on the New York Magazine paints him as an incredibly insencere manipulator, which lines up with accusations made by Helen Toner and others. Things he repeatedly says (not caring about money, caring a lot about safety) are often at odds with his actions.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/sam-altman-artificia...
Would you actually take a call while running? I wouldn't.
> to fit the human hand naturally and no other form factor could possibly be right.

I still think this is correct. "Features" like Reachability, and even Screen Time, are software solutions to hardware problems.

I don't think people would be as addicted to their smartphones if they stayed small. At that size, they were more of a tool, and a means to get something done when away from a proper computer. As the size increased, it became mobile-first, doom scrolling entered the picture, and people started asking if phones were bad of our mental health.
This downplays the GOP’s role. Their decades-long plan, including stacking the courts, reveals just how hateful and ruthless they are in pursuing their agenda.

While Democrats could have done more, obstacles like the filibuster and narrow majorities made passing protections difficult. The bigger issue is the GOP’s deliberate and depraved effort to strip away rights. Don’t give them a pass on it by blaming others.
Renovate has a feature called "Dependency Dashboard" which does exactly that.
Hey everyone,

I wanted to share something I’ve been working on this for a while now. It’s called Easy UI - https://easyui.pro/ , and it’s a collection of free, open-source Next.js templates.

When I first started building, I was searching for high-quality templates, but most of what I found was paid and a few crapy. That’s what pushed me to create Easy UI—a collection of high-quality Next.js templates.

I built templates for different use cases like:

• SaaS startups
• AI tools
• Simple chat UIs
• Retro-styled themes
• And a few other random ideas I thought were fun to explore

Everything is built using Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Magic UI, Shadcn UI, Aceternity UI, and a few more libraries I love working with.

It’s been a fun journey, and I hope others can find it useful, whether you're working on a project or just exploring new ways to build.

I started Easy UI just 20 days ago, and it’s been an incredible journey! In under 3 weeks:

• 20k+ website visitors
• 129+ GitHub stars
• Liked by founders of Magic UI, Aceternity UI, Buildspace, Next UI, Prisma, and Rive.

I would love to get your feedback on Easy UI.

Thank you!
This seems neat in theory but I would be perpetually concerned that it is going to pull some change I don't mean to commit and put it into something for review. How well does it do at that, anecdotally?
What are your thoughts on the "ship, show, ask" workflow? [1]

In that workflow, small stuff is simply pushed, which allows PRs to be more single focused and more atomic. Perhaps your only objection is direct pushes to master? I am really curious if that workflow otherwise addresses all of the downsides you stated while still allowing for all PRs to be uniformly rebase-squash merged.

[1] https://martinfowler.com/articles/ship-show-ask.html
Even though some people will tell you old school OpenGL fixed function pipeline is bad or out of date or whatever, I still really liked learning from Lighthouse3D (http://www.lighthouse3d.com/tutorials/) and Edward Angel's book OpenGL: A Primer (https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/opengl-a-pri...).
You can use smoothmq (SQS over sqlite) for a celery backend: https://smoothmq.com/
I don’t think I’ve seen a single codebase using that pattern ever. With React being so popular and TS growing in popularity just about after React, people have settled on `as` assertions instead, whether they use JSX or not.
Interesting point. the one serious accident I have had while cycling occurred while I was looking for a street sign.

Well designed AR apps would definitely be an improvement over looking down at a mounted phone, too.
As I understand it, you have to be OK with the death penalty, to be on a capital jury.
Reminds me of a conversation with a late friend. We wondered: what would the most academic book possible look like?

It could have: one brief, vague, and hedged statement, supported by a crapton of superscript references -- which constitute the rest of the book.

So like:

"Chapter 1:

Some things about the universe are at least partly knowable.<references 1-100,000>

The End."
> This will probably be an unpopular opinion, but Meta is in the right direction and has to go on an Amazon type arc to align their employees with their vision.

It's not just unpopular, it's just wrong.

Even if Zuckerberg's vision is good (and there's no reason to think it is, because he famously doesn't understand human beings and has never come up with a single product idea that became popular), he clearly has no ability to execute.

Spending $50B in a few years with almost no revenue to show for it has to be the biggest business failure of all time. Can you name a bigger one? Sure, Musk has destroyed roughly that much value on paper, but Zuckerberg actually set that much cash on fire building the Metaverse that no one asked for and no one uses.
I love lazygit so much. I use it all the time, and it's constantly improving my workflow.
You get to choose either the mind-numbing churn of constant updates, the risk of updates piling up and becoming unmanageable, or shipping software with vulnerabilities. None of these options sounds fun.
Discussion (251 points, 24 hours ago, 122 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41643700
The contracts usually state that they can go after the original owner if the new one can't pay. So even paying a terminally ill patient to take it over won't work.
I’ve been using autofixup for this and it’s been ok but not great, it can be quite slow as things grown, and it doesn’t say anything when there was no match so it’s easy to miss. How does absorb surface that?

> Perhaps partially due to how GitHub works.

That’s definitely a major factor, I’d like to use stacked PRs they sound really neat, but GitHub.

Also even with stacked PRs I figure sometimes you’re at the top of the stack and you change things which affect multiple commits / prs anyway, surely in that case you need to fixup other commits than the ToS?
Yeah, even disabling a bunch of things and pausing the scene tree, Godot still uses 5% of my CPU (i3-6100T):

func _ready() -> void:
set_physics_process(false)
PhysicsServer2D.set_active(false)
PhysicsServer3D.set_active(false)
Engine.max_fps = 1
RenderingServer.render_loop_enabled = false
get_tree().paused = true

I wonder what's using that CPU?
Why would anyone even consider ever buying hardware from Meta? Look at their list of killed products or how quickly they EOL previous models. No thanks! I hope they get sued for contributing to e-waste.
With autocomplete (like with Jetbrain's Datagrip) I found that verbose table names aren't that much of a problem; they in fact really help readability.
I think this misses the physics though. The math is just describing a phenomenon observed. The phenomenon implies a dimension of influence outside spacetime. This is a remarkable observation if true because no known force in known dimensions can easily account for this.

The math just demonstrates this to be likely true. Math is a tool physics uses to create logically consistent conclusions. And this one is remarkable.
Leveraging Falcon and Rails for Real-Time Interactivity
It’s not just open source that trains on the validation set. The big labs have already forgotten more about gaming MMLU down to the decimal than the open source community ever knew. Every once in a while they get sloppy and Claude does a faux pas with a BIGBENCH canary string or some other embarrassing little admission of dishonesty like that.

A big lab gets exactly the score on any public eval that they want to. They have their own holdouts for actual ML work, and they’re some of the most closely guarded IP artifacts, far more valuable than a snapshot of weights.
The spec is very large, not particularly well written, and is not “total” (in the sense that AMD64 and IA32e and other x86-64 flavors are all subtly different). There are a lot of ways to get it wrong; even XED (the reference decoder from Intel) has bugs.

If I remember correct, the Intel SDM alone is over 3000 pages long.
That’s very kind, thank you.
What’s amazing about this is they were looking for something else and saw something unexpectedly odd and discovered potentially a new dimension of reality. Wtf.
100%. Amazon is the anti-competitive king. They just copy everything thats popular. unfortunately you cant just copy your way to sql server. Apple, Google, they all do the same. Sour grapes the MS does it better.
I know a professor like this, and I feel sorry for his students too.
Then you should use the language that’s memory safe without GC.
This has been my experience as well. I’ve had to rip Capstone out of more research projects than I care to admit.
Also they are the company which decided to ditch CANbus on their cars. This protocol itself is already a clown.
There are many basic things we know about the brain that can be attributed to behavioral science. For example there is a ton of solid research from lesion studies that provide insight on, for example, the function of almost every cortical and subcortical region in supporting memory, language, emotion, motor control, all aspects of perception, attention, etc.
It can’t, it’s the most likely answer to the question based on what it knows. Which kind of makes it funnier
https://archive.is/2024.09.03-101619/https://www.nytimes.com...
The rulers:

https://www.molossia.org/autograph.html
It seems to be working quite well in terms of ISP choice (see my reply to cycomanic). And Chorus is offering up to 8 Gbps connections over XGS-PON, with most of the other fibre companies either also offering XGS-PON or working to offer it.

I suppose there are a couple of downsides compared to being able to use your own ONT, in that residential customers can't get SPF ONTs, and Chorus's XGS-PON ONT is quite large and not wall-mountable, which has caused a few people to hold out on XGS-PON offerings (they're working to offer a smaller one, but it got set back a bit, and they also won't start offering it until they run out of the old XGS-PON ONTs). But that's all quite minor (a residential customer wanting an SPF ONT is very niche indeed, as is a genuine need for a residential XGS-PON connection).
There is exactly zero inbound communication that I will action via the incomming communication method.

Email, text, phone call, etc, I will follow up with people I know on a separate channel.

That's just for requests, of course I'd chat with people I know. But there are vanishingly small reasons for anyone to need my information, so any request is cause for pause.

Money is a hard no. Sorry Prince of Nairobi, you'll have to meet me in person to resolve your financial woes.
The original iPod might have been a brick compared to the iPod nano, but it still wasn't that big. I don't think many people today would be upset to carry an original iPod. It was much smaller than the discman sized devices it was competing with.

The original iPhone was one of the smallest iPhones ever made. It did nothing but get bigger over time. If you want to compare the modern smart phone to a Zack Morris phone, or the bag phones that came before it, that would be a better way to go if the argument is size reduction over time.
On the other hand, a "boring" industry doesn't generate 4-5 on call events per week for just one team.
If they don't take the polite "no", immediately reach for insults. People who intentionally annoy you don't deserve civility - they're not showing any themselves.

My personal favorites is along the lines of: "Are you hard of hearing, you stupid clown?" - no overly foul language and safe to use in most company.

Few will try selling stuff to someone hurling nothing but insults at them. There's really only one group of people this doesn't work on, and they're the bottom of the barrel trying to find victims on public transport and the like. If you figure out a way to reliably get rid of them, let me know!
The original comment was premised on them being income-generating assets, which gold and btc are not
Exploit authors look at commit logs because new features have bugs in them, and it's easier to follow that to find vulnerabilities than dive into the codebase to find what's already there.
Agreed on getting hung up on tech stack. On the other hand, it's a mostly-harmless way to try learning new tech, which is fun.

I've bounced between almost a dozen different stacks and platforms and these days I've wound up back at WordPress (self-hosted).

I do have an itch to start my own platform though, based on Haven.org. (I'd contribute but I'm not a Ruby dev!)

Feels like I just go through phases. Gutenberg's been a little annoying to learn and WP always felt heavy for what I need, but it's also always offered whatever functionality when I need it.
I don’t know the size or structure of your team, but one thing that has worked for me in addition to other strategies mentioned on this thread (specifically, that oncall is oncall, nothing else) is that you appoint one engineer - typically someone who has a more strategic mindset as the “OE Czar”. They are NOT on call, and ideally not even in the rotation, but rather there for two reasons: to support oncalls when they need longer term support, like burning down a longer running task/investigation or keeping continuity between shifts. The other is identifying and planning (or executing on) processes and systems for fixing issues that continually crop up. Our mandate was 20% of this person’s time spent doing Czar tasks vs scheduled work.
You may not be out of the woods yet..
Most of Apple's Objective-C code is in the application layer just like yours is
I'm a little surprised no one has recommended the Frank Luna books. They're great introductory books. I used the DX9/DX10 books during my education when writing my game engines. I haven't read the DX12 book, but DX9/10/11 were basically the same structure only updated for the new APIs.

https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-3D-Game-Programming-Dire...
> No, that's silly and not at all the same thing as a prosecutor being accountable to the electorate as a whole.

In my perspective, it is exactly the same thing when you disagree with the electorate. Which is why (personnally) I don't want you, or any electorate choosing prosecutors.

If every time you voted for a prosecutor, and every time your vote was in a minority, would you still feel you had a say in the bias of the prosecutor?

I agree with respect to appointments being not good. In my view those are proxies for an election. I personally trust neither electorate nor elected officials.
TL;DR: on-call manages acute issues, documents steps taken, possibly farms out immediate work to subject matter experts. Rate on-call based on traces they leave behind. Separate on-call with same population, but longer rotation window handles fixes. Rate this rotation based on root cause reoccurrence and general ticket stats trendlines.

Longer reply:

I have on-call experience for major services (DynamoDB front door, CosmosDB storage, OCI LoadBalancer). Seen a lot of different philosophies. My take:

1. on-call should document their work step by step in tickets and make changes to operational docs as they go: a ticket that just has "manual intervention, resolved" after 3 hours is useless; documenting what's happening is actually your main job; if needed, work to analyze/resolve acute issues can be farmed out

2. on-call is the bus driver, shouldn't be tasked with handling long term fixes (or any other tasks beyond being on-call)

3. handover between on-calls is very important, prevents accidentally dropping the ball on resolving longer time horizon issues; handover meetings

Probably the most controversial one: separate rotation (with a longer window - eg. 2 week) should handle tasks that are RCA related or drive fixes to prevent reoccurrence

Managers should not be first tier on any pager rotation, if you wouldn't approve pull requests, you shouldn't be on the rotation (other than as a second tier escalation). Reverse should also hold: if you have the privilege to bless PRs, you should take your turn in the hot seat.
It has a battery in it (the puck is compute). It lasts 2 hours at the moment.
> Yet the company is still shipping, like no other.

I don't see it for OpenAI, I do see it for the competition. They have shipped incremental improvements, however, they are watering down their current models (my guess is they are trying to save on compute?). Copilot has turned into garbage and for coding related stuff, Claude is now better than gpt-4.

Honestly, their outlook is bleak.
I'm sure Apple has prototypes like this internally. Apple clearly thinks AR is the way to go, and even tries to avoid calling Vision Pro VR. I think it's simply the tech isn't ready yet, and Apple isn't the type of company that develops in public. When we see what they have to offer, we'll be able to buy it within a matter of weeks or months.

Vision Pro could even be a red herring to get apps developed, so when their true mass market product launches it will already have thousands of native apps.
Can recommend Opentelemetry if you need a more comprehensive tool like this.

There is a whole library of so called instrumentation that can monkeypatch standard functions and produce traces of them.

Traces can also propagate across process and rpc, giving you a complete picture, even in a microservice architecture.
With overhangs/bridges, you eventually get into the habit of just trying to design a part so you can avoid that. Sometimes, of course, it is unavoidable. But it is quite strange and nice how your brain starts to just morph use cases into a shape and orientation that makes it easily printable after you've been thinking in the problem space for awhile. Eventually you just end up baking up creative printing solutions that try to avoid the need for supports entirely where possible because introducing supports introduces so many downsides from not only the material cost, but also the aesthetics, time, and frustration perspective as well.

XTC is a good solution for some use cases, and quite bad for others, as outlined above. For the use case in the OP, probably it would be quite nice. That use case is one that is hobbyist level of output in terms of number of units generated but also one where aesthetics are quite important if not fundamental to the overall design. For this kind of use case XTC is a good fit.

The one other thing to consider, if you design to use stuff like XTC and even the urethanes I mention above, is that obviously it takes up some amount of space. So you have to factor that into the design. Probably what I would do is take my boundaries from the original design and increase the tolerance by maybe 1mm or so for the extra space the finishing agent will take up. Because I highly suspect that if you applied XTC to the dock in the OP that the phone would no longer fit after that due to the tight tolerances in the design without that adjustment.
I can't read. oops.
That's what was said years ago.
At the risk of being rude, how on _earth_ could get that jokes without realising that that's already the joke they were making?
Seems AI generated. Cringe.
Thanks. I got interested in this topic as people are talking about writing OS kernel code in Rust but a) it only helps new code and b) very hard to justify rewriting millions of lines of C code in Rust (plus rewrites are never 100% faithful feature wise). If on the other hand if C can be made safer, may be through a stepwise process where the code is rewritten incrementally to pass through C->C0->C1->Cn compilers, each making incremental language changes, much more of code can be made safer. It will never be as good as Rust but I do think this space is worth exploring.
Before even reading the somewhat clickbaity article, here's my own experience with the effect of egg consumption on cholesterol. This is a sample size of 1, so take it with the same pinch of salt you'd take with your eggs.

- Boiled eggs seem to cause severe and sudden jump in cholesterol compared to scrambled and fried. My hypothesis here is that the degree of coagulation of the protein affects the levels differently.
- Lack of physical exercise causes an immediate uptick in high cholesterol-related symptoms.
- The other components of the diet, for example, yogurt seem to lessen the impact
I doubt ollama team can do much about it. Ollama are just wrapper on top of heavy lifter