skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A church raffle only happens once a year, and the time between buying the ticket and getting the reward is relatively long. That is not going to lead to an addiction.

Having the TV blaring gambling commercials at you constantly and having the ability to place a bet from your phone at a moments notice is completely different. You’re comparing having a glass of wine on a special occasion with downing a fifth of whiskey every night.
Everything is great. If only there was a similar GUI tool with the same level of performance for GNU/Linux.
>These attacks could be executed remotely on any hardware-equipped vehicle in about 30 seconds, regardless of whether it had an active Kia Connect subscription.
And it does RAG and web search too now.
>enabled and masked by AI productivity gains.

That's a fantasy, unless these are really menial jobs.
Would you agree that WPE automatically makes a mental connection to WordPress? I dare say this would not be the case if it was named Josh Mutton Engine JME
There used to be something similar to this (was it called wikimapia?) back around 2008-2010 or so (maybe it's still around?) where people could up/down vote the tags and if the downvotes prevailed the tag would go away.
I'm having a hard time figuring out if this is satire, or "for real". Which probably says something about the moment we live in.
Importing from the state would be good.

Doing this with resources is going to be the easy path. Translating the state representation of re-usable modules I expect is going to be more difficult but necessary for the migration path to be useful. A lot of power in Terraform is being able to stack re-usable components, say an internal module representing a service on top of a public module that provides sensible defaults like the terraform-aws-modules collection which then sits on top of resources.

If you can get this to a place where an existing deployment of Terraform modules can be imported into SI as a collection of re-usable templates and then users can easily deploy n+1 of those templates the same way they would do with Terraform I think you will have an easy migration path.

If not importing from the state at least some way of automatically importing those re-usable components and allowing the deployment of n+1 of a reusable component would be helpful to migration from existing patterns.
This is boilerplate search engine advertising. Retail advertising is another term but slightly different
Wait a moment, the key vulnerability appears to be that anyone could register as a dealer, but also any dealer could lookup information on any Kia even if they didn't sell it or if it was already activated!? That seems insane. What if a dealership employee uses this to stalk an ex or something?
The baptists and the bootleggers

https://a16z.com/ai-will-save-the-world/
How much does the increase in casual sexual encounters have to do with this?
Remote start via phone is still useful in cold climates. While getting a ride with a friend to my car left at some location I've been able to start & get it warmed up before we even got off the highway.

It was nice and warm by the time I arrived to it. With only a keyfob it would have still been ice cold.

Absolutely not a necessary feature, but I miss it (free MyLink subscription expired and I won't pay for it).
Is it really so much better than an RF keyfob that it's worth connecting your car to the Internet for?
https://play.rosebud.ai/home
There are no new cars on the market today that don't have a slew of connected """features""", right?

Will it ever be possible to have a non-connected car? If so, how? What would it actually take? This is not a ranty rhetorical question -- I'm actually wondering.
You claim that people hate Musk because of jealousy and/or politics. I don’t see any evidence of that. What I see is people being unwilling to entrust their lives to someone with a recent history of incredibly childish and questionable behavior. He shitposts on Twitter all day and runs his companies like a pig-headed 19th century baron. I don’t detect an iota of leadership in the man anymore: only ego.

Why would functional FSD emerge from a company with a toxic culture like Tesla’s? Any self-respecting engineer with advanced skills will jump ship at the first opportunity.
This is an astonishing amount of nonsensical waffle.

Firstly, *skeptics.

Secondly, being skeptical doesn't mean you have no optimism whatsoever, it's about hedging your optimism (or pessimism for that matter) based on what is understood, even about a not-fully-understood thing at the time you're being skeptical. You can be as optimistic as you want about getting data off of a hard drive that was melted in a fire, that doesn't mean you're going to do it. And a skeptic might rightfully point out that with the drive platters melted together, data recovery is pretty unlikely. Not impossible, but really unlikely.

Thirdly, OpenAI's efforts thus far are highly optimistic to call a path to true AI. What are you basing that on? Because I have not a deep but a passing understanding of the underlying technology of LLMs, and as such, I can assure you that I do not see any path from ChatGPT to Skynet. None whatsoever. Does that mean LLMs are useless or bad? Of course not, and I sleep better too knowing that LLM is not AI and is therefore not an existential threat to humanity, no matter what Sam Altman wants to blither on about.

And fourthly, "wanting" to stop them isn't the issue. If they broke the law, they should be stopped, simple as. If you can't innovate without trampling the rights of others then your innovation has to take a back seat to the functioning of our society, tough shit.
Who are the weak being "sacrificed"?

And who is the one calling for action?

Sorry for being dense, but I'm trying to understand if I'm the "strong" or the "weak" in your analogy.
Yes, I accept the risk and threat model. RF fobs are compromised frequently as well. Unless you rip the cellular module out of my vehicles, I will find it, and someone is just going to break the window if they want in.

Edit: Non connected cars for the risk adverse, connected cars for those with the risk appetite. The market will self sort, even if telematics requires more regulatory oversight (they do!).

https://www.google.com/search?q=fob+relaying+theft+attack
As someone who has dealt with Nvidia messing up resource transitions on AMD cards, I'm not sure how much I would trust a library made by them to also handle that. But besides that point, this seems to do the same stuff that other libraries have done in the past.

Additionally from what I've heard most of those aren't used since if you're doing Vulkan or DX12 you're doing so for the increased control and better potential performance. Throwing in a library to track everything without any understanding of the application just reduces that performance unnecessarily.

The only thing I can pull as evidence for that (anecdotal of course), is this is the first time I've heard of this and I work in the DX12 field on the GPU side. But it's also possible that the library doesn't present itself in any way on the debugging side of things.
I always found the Chinese room to be self-evident as intelligent
Ai game maker I've been looking at: https://play.rosebud.ai/home
The submitter created his account solely for this submission also. Slightly odd.

The real Drew DeVault would probably develop such a thing on SourceHut, not Github.
Indeed. Even if this worked 95% of the time, that 5% where it escalates things just isn't worth it IMO. Also, pissing people off that know where you live isn't a great idea.

It's basically WarGames. The only winning move is not to play. I don't answer the door when I'm certain it's a salesman. I don't make eye contact/respond to the ones that are setup outside of a store. Same with the ones setup in malls/stores (looking at you, Costco).
Very cool visualization! Would love to see it with labels and color. I'd use it if I can glace at it and get a sense of how much of my day is left.
How has the Internet? How has automobiles? Feels like a rather aimless question.
My understanding is the way the tokenization works prevents the LMM from being able to count occurrences of words or individual characters.
I also don't have a dog in the fight but reading for a few minutes I have the impression there have been previous attempts to engage with WPE to contribute. I might be wrong.
A personal rule of mine is to always separate data receipt+storage from parsing. The retrieval is comparatively very expensive and has few possible failure modes. Parsing can always fail in new and exciting ways.

Disk space to store the returned data is cheap and can be periodically flushed only when you are certain the content has been properly extracted.
This is a crab in a boiling pot pulling the other crabs back rather than let them escape.

After we all demonstrated increased productivity during Covid, with record profits, everyone is happier and it’s better for the environment… we all have to go in because otherwise we’re somehow smug about our importance?

Does that make any sense? This just reads as jealousy to me; not really a good spot to make calls from.
I think the same could be said software engineers. I don't engage with the general public about writing people's next brilliant idea because it's a hige waste of my time when I could be making FAANG bucks talking to people who know that I'm worth it. While I will alwatry to explain to my mom how the internet works etc, it's not economically justifiable to engage laymen tonsolve their probno matter how altruistic it may seem. I still have to pay the bills. How are lawyers any different?
Automatic unlock with a phone is not an anti feature. If it replaces your key fob completely, then it’s one less thing you have to carry. I haven’t carried keys of any kind for… 6 years at this point?

Also, remote start/temp control that works no matter the distance as long as there’s internet connectivity is superior to a radio based implementation. There’s plenty of places that are largely RF impermeable, or otherwise distance is too far. If you’re in a store, 100ft is barely any distance, especially with the layers of concrete in the way.
ECH - if I understand correctly it's effective for sites hosted on big providers like Cloudflare, AWS, etc, but doesn't add much value when it comes to self-hosted domains or those on a dedicated server, as you'd still see traffic going to whatever IP and be able to infer from that which domain the user's browswer is talking to. I'm hoping someone can explain that I missed something.

And while we're explaining things... ODoH (indirectly mentioned in the article via the Encrypted DNS link) comes with a big bold warning it's based on the fundamental premise that the proxy and the target servers do not collude. When both are operated by the same company, how can you know they aren't colluding? Is there some mechanic in the protocol to help protect users from colluding servers?
> cheaper to buy

Yeah, that probably won't happen for a long time.

> more convenient

If you can charge at home, then for daily driving, they're more convenient than ICE. Road trips aren't bad if you have access to Tesla Superchargers. If you're CCS only, then it's another story.

> cheaper to use in the long run

If you can charge using residential rates in an area that doesn't have absurd energy pricing, then in the long run, an EV IS cheaper. The cost to replace a battery is a popular talking point, but it's just not relevant on any EV that isn't a first generation Leaf. It typically takes over 100,000 miles to see even 10% degradation.

EVs are cheaper to maintain. No oil changes, your brake pads last forever, no transmission fluids...your only maintenance is tires, cabin air filter, and wiper blades/fluid.

> EVs are running at 0.5 for 3, at best.

If you charge at home, I'd say they're 1.75 out of 3, with 0.25 taken out just for road trips.
Henry Rollins is another good one - I still enjoy watching the expression change on his face when he realized that Nardwuar actually knew his stuff, but he had gone too far down the path of tough guy to save the interview.
Well... There is no reason to have a middleman like the OEM, so the car could be connected just with the formal owner (i.e. with a personal subdomain o dyndns), FLOSS stack under users control and some hard limits (like you can't act on the car if it moving and so on).
It's actually been important for medical reasons, as the morphology of bread clips is relevant for removing them.

HORG collaborated with the authors of this paper: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22679182/
I'm not soured on tech. I'm soured on the tech industry. I think there's quite a difference between these two things.

Using OpenAI as an example. ChatGPT is wonderful for the things it's made for. It's a tool, and a great one but that's all it is.

But OpenAI itself is a terrible company and Sam Altman is a power hungry conman that borders on snakeoil salesman.

And I'm soured on people like the CEO of my company who wants to shove a GPT chatbot into our application to do things that it's not at all good at or made for because they see dollar signs.
He used to repulse me, but I've gotten used to him and find him endearing now. No, it doesn't make any sense.

He is a genuinely kind person who does some seriously deep research and asks interesting questions.
A 12-Month Immersive Course in Humanities (Continued)
They both do.
It's not clear at all from the title, or even the linked webpage, that this is an Android thing.
The modern GPU abstraction layers are now funnier than the old "Linux audio" abstraction layers
Octopuses are practically alien.

They can:

- shape shift into so many different forms and shapes.

- "invisibility", by instantanously changing colors & it's own skin texture, to match surrounds.

- can regrow entire body parts if cut off (like arms)

- have 9 brains (localized)

- and are ridiculous intelligent
That's true, but my stance frankly wouldn't change if they also thought Google and Apple needed to spend the rest of their existence as a charity case. My point is more that it's a silly measure of damages, since this behavior is table stakes in the FAANG echelons. It's like saying that we should reject Open Source contributions by Google and Amazon because they pay their engineers with money made off exploitative server deals. It's a reach.
Remove unwanted objects from picture using brush tool
One is using an existing “off-the-shelf” technology, the other is not.
A boolean column type.
Over-configured Jira is so much worse because it only gets slower the more configuration happens and some sorts of managers love top-down micro-management and force wild workflows that make no sense other than for wasting time on red tape.

Given the (forced [0]) choice I'd rather use unconfigured Jira than configured Jira. The mysterious "well configured" Jira is a Goldilocks zone that I've heard theoretically exists but have never once encountered in the wild.

[0] If the choice is Jira or a gun to my head, for instance.
Your first paragraph with very small tweaks (laws of physics etc., not law) could also apply to human attendants in elevators.

The second paragraph… hard to make a call on that one.
Of course, with this Kia attack, it didn't matter if you had never used or activated the feature, it was still vulnerable. With keyfobs you can just not use it or destroy it if you are worried about relay attacks.

Connecting every car to the Internet at all times just in case their owners might want to activate a remote start feature at some point is nuts.
> It's difficult to see when the 80% will ever pay off.

Two words: resale value

Aside from lack of scratch and dent wear, showing a 98% - 100% battery health is very convincing that the phone is "like new".

This gets you back up to the "refurb" price levels instead of the "trade in" price levels from Apple or Gazelle.
Yeah, important distinction
As a Kia owner, this was what I was hoping for immediate term, FTA: "These vulnerabilities have since been fixed, this tool was never released, and the Kia team has validated this was never exploited maliciously."

Kia still has a lot of work to do because of bad decisions, but at least my vehicle isn't ripe for theft/abuse.
Don't feel stupid, feel a little angry. The only thing you could have done to prevent this was not buy a Kia.
Glad I'm not the only one. Squashing branches pre-merge, or post-merge solves the problems of commit purity (main/develop/prod/etc always builds at every commit) while preserving the intent of any MR/PR. Squashing also makes rebases _A LOT_ easier; every bad day you've had executing a rebase is likely solved by squashing your feature/fix branch, first.

Going back in time to fix the past just to sort your changes into the "correct" bin or vicinity of changes just seems unnecessarily complex. I am also unaware of what use-cases this supports. Are teams out there forcing commits to have a stricter scope than just "anything in the codebase"? Perhaps it's a monorepo pattern? I have no idea.

Either way, you have to `git push --force` to modify your PR/MR. May as well use the stock workflow and learn how to clean up your branch.

I also endorse `git commit --amend` for anyone that identifies as a "micro-committer" but doesn't need to preserve intermediate changes.

Edit: re-reading comments - it sounds sort of like some teams prefer to bin changes like this in order to make a PR/MR browsable by commit, rather than inspect one big broad diff. Is that the case?
> complaints of Luddites largely concerned "who profits", the use of bargaining power (sometimes illicit), and economic arrangements in general

I have never thought of being anti-AI as “Luddite”, but actually this very description of “Luddite” does sound like the concerns are in fact not completely different.

Observe:

Complaints about who profits? Check; OpenAI is earning money off of the backs of artists, authors, and other creatives. The AI was trained on the works of millions(?) of people that don’t get a single dime of the profits of OpenAI, without any input from those authors on whether that was ok.

Bargaining power? Check; OpenAI is hard at work lobbying to ensure that legislation regarding AI will benefit OpenAI, rather than work against the interests of OpenAI. The artists have no money nor time nor influence, nor anyone to speak on behalf of them, that will have any meaningful effect on AI policies and legislation.

Economic arrangements in general? Largely the same as the first point I guess. Those whose works the AI was trained on have no influence over the economic arrangements, and OpenAI is not about to pay them anything out of the goodness of their heart.
Unpopular take: Agile was effective at the beginning, before it turned into a certification/rubberstamping goldmine and became so complicated that any efficiency gains evaporated when faced with the amount of ceremony.

These days you don’t really need specific tooling—nor should you rely on it to rate features and keep track of meaningful work.
Russian Economy on the Verge of Implosion
> Because it often isn't. I don't know about your experience, but in all the teams I've worked in throughout my career the discipline to keep PRs atomic is almost never maintained, and sometimes just doesn't make sense. Sometimes you start working on a change, but spot an issue that is either too trivial to go through the PR/review process, or closely related to the work you started but worthy of a separate commit. Other times large PRs are unavoidable, especially for refactorings, where you want to propose a larger change but the history of the progress is valuable.

In my experience at least, PRs are atomic in that they always leave main in a "good state" (where good is pretty loosely defined as 'the tests had to pass once').

Sometimes you might make a few small changes in a PR, but they still go through a review. If they're too big, you might ask someone to split it out into two PRs.

Obviously special cases exist for things like large refactoring, but those should be rare and can be handled on a case by case basis.

But regardless, even if a PR has multiple small changes, I wouldn't revert or cherry-pick just part of it. Just do the whole thing or not at all.

> Oh, plenty. For one, when looking at `git blame` to determine why a change was made, I hope to find this information in the commit message. This is what commit messages are for anyway. If all commits have this information, following the history of a set of changes becomes much easier. This is helpful not just during code reviews, but after the merge as well, for any new members of the team trying to understand the codebase, or even the author themself in the future.

Yeah but the context for `git blame` is still there when doing a squash merge, and the commit message should still be relevant and useful.

My point isn't that history isn't useful, it's that the specific individual commits that make up a PR don't provide more useful context than the combined PR commit itself does.

I don't need to know that a typo was fixed in iteration 5 of feedback in the PR that was introduced in iteration 3. It's not relevant once the PR is merged.
Don't anthropomorphize the lawnmower and blame Kia for this, blame the NHTSA for making it legal to skimp out on immobilizers in the first place. Regulations matter!
Fed's high-rates era handed $1T windfall to US banks
The non-profit would have to approve the scheme, and a rational non-profit would not, because it gives up any ability the non-profit has to fulfill its charter.
Fixing it with careful application of software-in-general is quite promising, but LLMs in particular are a terrible minefield of infinite whack-a-mole. (A mixed metaphor, but the imagery is strangely attractive.)

I currently work in the HR-tech space, so suppose someone has a not-too-crazy proposal of using an LLM to reword cover-letters to reduce potential bias in hiring. The issue is that the LLM will impart its own spin(s) on things, even when a human would say two inputs are functionally identical. As a very hypothetical example, suppose one candidate always does stuff like writing out the Latin like Juris Doctor instead of acronyms like JD, and then that causes the model to end up on "extremely qualified at" instead of "very qualified at"

The issue of deliberate attempts to corrupt the LLM with prompt-injection or poisonous training data are a whole 'nother can of minefield whack-a-moles. (OK, yeah, too far there.)
I live in a smaller country and all sponsors pretty much are betting companies. These sponsors by far are most lucrative compared to your usual brands exactly because of how much they make from betting. Other industries wouldn't be able to pay as much for sponsorship since due to not so large viewership they wouldn't gain all of it back.

Negatives aside if you are fine with the losses it could be viewed a bit like donating to the football clubs.

Larger football clubs could be fine taking pay cuts etc, but there would likely be many smaller clubs that can't pay their players on the pro or semi pro level any longer.
There was 1 time in the past 50 years when that might have happened during Obama’s term for a couple of months, as opposed to republicans polices that want to send women back to the 1850’s for going on decades now. I’ll be fine with blaming dems 1% vs 99% of the repressive efforts of the GOP
Milei is doing pretty great things in Argentina. Their present might not be great, but their future could be.
This is in a context of file watching library. Although I'm not sure cargo-watch supports or even needs to support regex.
I came here to say exactly this.
Life in rural America has always been difficult. Appalachia, for example, has a history of severe poverty that in some ways still exists.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Appalachia/comments/vizs8f/it_blows...
aged badly in a very good way :D