skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Also, it costs $25,000. But that might not be related to it being a dual-layer LCD, but rather other exacting tolerances for professional mastering use.
Is the radiation not similar to the one you get in space? seems like that would be a cheaper place to test the effects of radiation.
You're not wrong, but people who oppose "science as a cudgel" tend to support "religion as a cudgel", and don't see a difference between science and religion, except that one is the Yellow team and one is the Purple team, and they have a preferred color.
> I’ve heard that a while back Google had a change to their algo that heavily prioritized widely used websites as “trusted”.

They super-obviously did that some time around ‘08 or ‘09. Basically just gave up on the cat-and-mouse game they’d played with spam for years, based on actual content and (what they hoped they managed to suss out as) organic linking, and switched to heavy reputation- and size-weighting instead. It was a giant shift in their search’s behavior and unlike anything they’d done before, not subtle at all.
Not sure if you guys know: Groq already doing this with their ASIC chips. So... the already passed FPGA phase and is on ASICs phase.

The problem is: seems that their costs is 1x or 2x from what they are charging.
I'm wondering if this would be fairly easy to do with AI?
5. git revert is tedious When one commit turns out to be bad, you can't revert it cleanly because your "Fix linting issues" builds upon it.
The goal is to be the man who stands at the right hand of God, holding the keys to the kingdom.
Why do I have such a hard time believing Iran is involved in the recent activities? No state actor is able to do anything substantially in the US and then Iran comes with multiple murder attempts and successful hacking of former president Trump.
Have to deduct points for not using TeletextString in the certificate.
The Ceefax team worked next to us at BBC News Online. Great guys!

They did almost all their programming on the live system. When they gave us simpletons from the web side of things a demo, the comment was: "well, anybody checking the football scores in Wales right now might be in for a bit of a surprise".

The software system they had to work with to program it all was ... "special". In one of those misguided attempts to make a scripting system "user friendly", the vendor had omitted any data structures or abstraction facilities worth mentioning. So the team built all the data structures out of Ceefax pages that were not being shown.

<Shudder>

When it came time to connect my feeds processing system to Ceefax, I created a little XML-based markup language I called CML (Ceefax Markup Language) so that we could use WebObjects builder and the general template mechanism to build Ceefax pages. IIRC we also built a little converter of CML to HTML so we could preview those pages easily

Fun times.
Gaming Lyft's Citi Bike algos was a lucrative side hustle for a while
Of course. We've always had criminals. And as you say, throughout
history people have complained about it. All I'm saying is that today
people positively celebrate it, and - according to the parent poster -
we now demand criminality as a necessity for "success".
In a sense I kind of respect it but the way OpenAI are 100x-ing all their statements ("Universal basic compute"!) like every small startup has to pretend to be the next XYZ (only on a much bigger scale) is hilarious. Are they even in the lead at the moment?
I've made a longer comment in another thread; but have you investigated the hashgraph algorithm? Gossip-about-gossip and virtual voting combine to result in leaderless consensus, fair ordering and aBFT. It's very performant with over 10k TPS on-chain. I'm learning about DLT from the perspective of hashgraph which is why I don't understand why it doesn't get love - it seems to have all of the good and none of the bad.
You can choose any year from the calendar, and there would be a Musk statement that says we'd be on Mars that year.
I'm happy to see a truly open source model.

Actually, AMD has excellent reasons to make this kind of development and I hope they continue.
While you may see that I vigorously comment against all the AI hype, I do not believe AI is as useless and wasteful as crypto currencies.

Beyond the LLM fad, AI is also being used in other pharmaceutical and scientific research as well as modern weather and disaster forecasting.

Also, I believe LLMs will get better over time and far cheaper to operate once they become more widely adapted. Think the super computers of our grand-dad era vs your Android/iPhone.

AI will get better over time and become more beneficial to us, but not in the form of current over hype fad that is flying because Sama needs to protect his investment and exit, he is a businessman above all else. AI innovation will come from the silent group who are busy with actual development and less hype generation. There is a saying that empty whistle makes most noise etc.

My IDE(mostly jetbrains products) make me 10x more productive. Claude/Phind saves me immense amount of time not having to sort through 100 garbage SEO spam results or try to waste time reading incoherent out dated documentation(followed by having to look through the source code) to find an important concept or reference to some third party library/application. These are real values that not only makes my day less stressful, it also makes my employer benefit accordingly by having me available to other important stuff with my freed time during working hours.

Crypto currency did not help anyone, only helped some grifters get rich, some ignorant people to lose money and numerous crooks to run ransomware attacks and easier time moving the loot.
Related:

Bad service is a sign of a better world - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41674275 - Sept 2024

(referenced and written by blog author in post above)
Wow, thank you so much, Paul Houle, for these clarifications; they are priceless to me.
The challenges are as follows:
- Driving traffic to the newly created shops
- The low potential user profits
- The competition in this field
- The capital required to start
- Possibly other challenges that haven't been identified yet

Since it's quicker and safer to challenge ideas before implementing them, do you think that some variations of this idea could mitigate as many of these challenges as possible?
I don't want to bother you, and I'm really grateful for your previous response.
Can you share what kind of toy is shuffling around so much data?
Exactly. Nobody needs to be told to "trust the science" on gravity and electricity, nobody asks to consult scientific consensus. The argument only arises for the more suspicious niches.
Ah, I see how you could misunderstand. In context, this sentence was contrasting between those who knew, and those who didn't know about the fraud. To make my point more clear:

It's impossible that none of them knew.

It's possible that some of them didn't know.
Who says these are mutually exclusive? Hard times make strong men, strong men make good times, good times make weak men, weak men make hard times.
I see multiple mentions of NPU on this page, but its still not clear to me: is this something that can finally use the NPU on my processor?
I was just saying you should most likely not be doing data processing with SSIS. That’s not what it’s for even if it can be cobbled in to doing some.
Here's a fun youtube video on just how much it'd take to survive on plant life alone. [1]

Spoilers: Can't be done without a huge amount of vegetation. Algae, on the other hand, can work, but it still takes a boat load of algae for just 1 person.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWRkzvcb9FQ
Appositive comma, or missing Harvard comma?
The problem is that detecting fraud is fundamentally harder than generating plausible fraud. This is because ultimately a very good fraud producer can simply produce output that is identically distributed to non-fraud.

For the same reason, tools that try to detect AI-generated text are ultimately going to lose the arm's race.
Personally, most projects outside the kernel are not really a priority for monitoring. The packaging ecosystem has always been a bit messy, but I would recommend sending the Debian and or Canonical admins a request to revoke the developer signing key to purge the problem/abandoned firejail application package moving forwards.

Best regards, =3
>it seems distributing power to more local level forms of governance works well for many things

>CCP COMMITS GENOCIDE AGAINST UIGHUR MUSLIMS XINJIANG

wow, you seem to really know what you're talking about!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_regions_of_China
ESO telescope captures the most detailed infrared map ever of our Milky Way
All three of them are trying not to break their character, and it's uncomfortable to watch. Many of his questions are inappropriate and disrespectful, I'm more surprised they could stand 15 minutes of this before walking off.
I only started thriving in school once I started practicing theory construction in my head.

Hypothesis->test->refine

I’m not sure I could still do it in realtime today. It takes a lot of cycles to do this and reading or pausing videos to process is more my speed now.

I’ve ended up spot tutoring a lot of people who still don’t get it. Having a theory of the system lets you answer their questions where a classmate would not be able to because they’re barely past rote.
I assume by "open inference" you mostly mean "weights available"?
We are in progress of putting a basketball hoop at the end of our dead-end street and are unfortunately concerned that there are a handful of residents who probably don't want it. I swing back and forth on who I think "the bad guys" are. But I know the kids will love it and it will keep them off their phones.
That's all of Lex's interviews.
What kind of "AI"? LLM-based hype would probably miss random ones.
It will look great in your portfolio.
So I guess it’s time for the hourly Hackernews propaganda push about “science bad”.
Most North American homes have 15 amp circuits for plugs (really only capable of handling 12 safely) and the best PSUs have a power factor of 0.9, so we're looking at a total max safe load of 1296W (12A x 120V x 0.9).

At the rate these components demand more and more power, we're years away from needing a dedicated power circuit for our gaming computers. Pretty sad really.
I'll sum it up for you:

"Vote for the person we picked for you because they're not Trump."
How so? The fraction of academic science that is applied to anything, anywhere, with clearly identifiable impact is both a tiny fraction of academic science, and also often detrimental quality of impact.
"Equally questionable" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there. There are literally massive, paradigm-changing projects in both spaces right now, with real users and communities. If you haven't gotten anything out of these technologies, that's on you and not them.

There's all manner of insane, ambitious things being worked on in the open right now, if you are able to muster the discernment necessary to ignore the natural, unavoidable pile of grift that follows any new technology or hype cycle.
They are already above average human level on many tasks, like math benchmarks.
Sometimes the product innovation is the distribution
Insurance companies insure one off events all the time. You can literally insure anything, its just a matter if the premiums outweigh what you perceive as the risk. "Uninsurable" just means the price is too high to be considered practical.

The research might be novel, but the procedures for research and publication are very similar. So insurance companies would just make sure that you followed a protocol which minimizes their risk.

perverse incentives are taken into account by insurance. Insuring someone is always a adversarial back and forth to determine if they are being truthful or not. Which is why Life insurance companies require a physical. They don't just have you self report and then accept it as fact.

Industry professionals like lawyers and doctors carry malpractice insurance. A lawyer can still commit fraud. Insurance isn't a black and white thing. It is a sliding scale that ties risk to a monetary value.

Its not rocket science. Just actuarial science. ;)
"The factory of the future is a man and a dog. The man's job is to feed the dog. The dog's job is to bite the man if he touches anything."

There will therefore be a sudden supply of half a million such factories.
> "No, no don't play with the wrapping paper! Look at the truck vroom vroom!" to no avail. She preferred the wrapping paper.

Your daughter a cat, by any chance? It's just the same with cats. They don't give a shit about anything you buy them, sometimes not even food - if there's packing peanuts, packing paper or Amazon cardboard boxes, that is more important.
Even though I disagree with Shockley’s points, I don’t think we should do post mortem “kicking” like this. He was brilliant but everybody left him to create Intel and he was left with debt. (Mostly due to his own doing though, he was apparently insufferable.)

But in the end, if I remember correctly, his wife did not organize a funeral for Shockley because she expected nobody would come. A sad ending to a sad life.
You better tell Memphis that.
There is a difference between "not considered strange at the time" and "science" via scientific publication and subsequent consensus validating the idea. I have mentioned that luminaries can have odd ideas multiple times in this thread, it's not something I seek to deny. However, as I continue to reiterate, these ideas are generally:

1. outside their areas of expertise

2. not validated by independent scientific research

I completely agree that science should be approached with thoughtful skepticism, and I agree that 'trust the science' might not necessarily be the best semantics to use. However, it is not clear that skepticism by all parties should be considered with equal weight. Most of the times, people should "trust the science" because they are not equipped to be skeptical.
That's not a reason to do something below ground on the moon. It would be a reason not to do something above ground, which, as I noted, we already don't do.
> However, Yao will not have inheritance; instead, it will be more like Go: composition over inheritance. And interfaces. So I could be wrong, but without inheritance, I'm not sure the entire complexity of the CLOS is needed. Do correct me, though.

I'm sadly not very well versed with this alternative to OOP. But something tells me that a more "basic" and less dynamic scheme like that is probably best for performance reasons, since you'd either need a Julia-like JIT or a granular "dynamism knob" like https://github.com/marcoheisig/fast-generic-functions to truly amortize the cost of CLOS-like dispatch and polymorphism; though magic can be done, as the "Fast generic dispatch for Common Lisp" paper shows.

> if those are just for giving info to macros, Yao already has that

Huh! If this includes types deduced by compiler inference and not just user declarations (since Yao seems gradually typed, to my eyes), that'd be pretty impressive.

Hope you'll be able to keep your spirits high, this is a lifetime's work you seem to be looking forward to ;)
Seki: Phone Link Alternative with Notification Mirroring, Screen Mirroring
> or they started an experiment and forgot to stop the program

That would be embarrassing.
Anything not Forbidden is Compulsory.
The README says that the tool "adjusts [the speaker's] volume if it exceeds a specified maximum" and that the notification is actually just to let you know that this has been done.
Hacker news is completely flooded with “AI learns just like humans do” and “AI models the human brain” despite neither of these things having any concrete evidence at all.

Unfortunately it isn’t just bosses being fooled by this. Scores of people push this crap.

I am not saying AI has no value. I am saying that these idiots are idiots.
Their key demand was the policy of the recent democratically elected government and has now been enacted: "No new oil and gas exploration in the North Sea"
>This reminds me of smart refrigerators that can notify me when the door is ajar. I'd rather have it constructed so that it just closes automatically.

a world of liability is escaped by avoiding that feature add. This is similar to why self-closing doors/trunks/hatches took so long to catch on. It wasn't a technology problem, Cadillac and Rolls Royce showed this stuff in the 60s -- it was a liability gamble.
Could SpaceX make a Starlink that revolves around the moon and could transmit imagery back to Earth?
Where are you getting $3B ARR number? curious about source.
How are "heavy handed covid response and censorship" a prime example of that?
$20M is small potatoes for a $300M ship that's now costing in the billions.
"King Features" in the above quote is a contemporary example. Regardless, my point is not that these syndications are impossible to identify (as is the same with CNN's featured links), but that they are similarly opaque. Syndication as a concept isn't something that is obvious to a person of average media literacy, and neither is a tiny byline that states "via AP".
> They conclude that AlphaChip outperforms them with much less compute and real time.

Of course they do.
I'm waiting for their products.
Hypermedia-Friendly Scripting (2022)
Seems like solar could easily supply?
> 'd like to see something in Android that gives an app file access with less access than "all files".

SELinux has been able to solve that problem in Android for a long, long time now. Which is more appropriate, as you say it should be the job of the OS.

The problem is the age old one where users want convenience at the cost of security.
Usually “open source” for an LLM means you get the weights and the inference code, which I’ve started calling “open inference”. It’s certainly good and useful, but it’s not the actual source of the model.

I find people get into silly arguments about the terminology because they’re focused on whether the “source” is “open” and not on what the “source” is actually the source of.

“Weights available” indicates even the weights aren’t “open” in the usual software meaning of the term, as they typically come with restrictive licenses (more restrictive than copyleft or attribution).
The sales pitch for the investors, of course, is that they will get to be God in this picture.
You are being downvoted because you extrapolating from one fraud case to call all scientists dishonest.

I can do it too. Person named SpaceManNabs made a bad post. There for all posts by SpaceManNabs, and probably all posts on HackerNews are bad. A dishonest lot.
I only started to really appreciate having a web page archive after cataloging the coffee I drank, which often have pages full of detail about the beans until they sell out and then, poof!, they’re taken offline.
People simply take the marketing bait when a simple spreadsheet of 20X0, 30X0, 40X0, 50X0 GPU specifications (cores/shader units, tensor, rt) plus memory bandwidth reveals that they are just reselling the same computing capacity as they have been for the last ten years, just with smaller manufacturing nodes.

A RTX 5060 with 4352 Su, I bet will be a RTX 4060 Ti AD107 with 4352 Su, the same as a RTX 2080 Ti TU102 with 4352 Su, all ones with Mem-Bus 128 bit.

Just smaller manufacturing nodes with name change.
You worked there at the time?
There is absolutely no way to achieve the impact of Henry Ford without actively trying extremely hard to be the next Henry Ford.
And this is the reason US activity is down nearly 20%+ from a year ago on Twitter.
Here is the recipe: you talk to them first about it, then they do nothing about it for weeks. And you repeat and it goes on. Then you create the script.
Science sent us to the moon. “Do your own research” sent millions to their graves.

“Do your own research” is a movement that is fraught with grifting and basically foundationally just fraud to the core.

“Science” definitely has some fraudsters, but remains the best institution we have in the search for truth.
> a world of liability is escaped by avoiding that feature add

Huh? There are no refrigerators that don't have that feature.
But wouldn't failure to achieve independent reproduction falsify the open claim?

Similar to you publish the source for Oracle (the database), but nobody can build a binary from it because it needs magic compliers or test suites that aren't open source?

Heck when the browser was open-sourced, there was an explicit test where the source was given to some dude who didn't work for Netscape to verify that he could actually make a working binary. It's a scene in the movie "Code Rush".
Never having been an elite semiconductor person myself, I have only the dimmest intuition about the absurd science, technology, engineering, and mathematics that goes into it: but you hear these parts per trillion, measured in angstroms, quantum mechanics type units of account and it’s hard not to imagine it as some world apart.

I have a fond fantasy that those folks are laughing their asses off whenever we call the software stuff “high technology”.
Not OP but don’t a lot of async libraries require things to be Send because they assume they’ll run on a multithreaded executor?
Just wait until they get saturated with subtle (and not so subtle) advertising. Then, you'll really hate them.
It got, about a month ago: https://apps.apple.com/se/app/superalarm-alarm-clock-sleep/i...

v2.5.1
ClassicPress: Based on WordPress without the block editor (Gutenberg)
Now this here is the beginning on real innovation of AI. With AMD coming in(albeit late and slowly), meta with LLama improving, we will soon see some real adaptation and development in next few thousand days. At this moment, I see OAI as the yahoo of the pre-Google era.
While I agree if we're dealing with completely logical operators, right now there is a massive potential for accidents.
What a weird reply to a call for advice. 'your machine got messed up somehow'. They now that, provide some recovery tips instead of downplaying.
Depends. Do you smell them?
Maybe he did, but not recently.

He posted this several days ago:
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1837908705683059166
Because chip placement and the design of neural network architectures are entirely different problems, so this solution won't magically transfer from one to the other.
> My problem with Just Stop Oil is all their activism is just targeting people that have nothing to do with oil.

Maybe they don’t like oil paintings.
This is what the test covered in the article is set to discover.
Only if you pay it back.
AI bots now beat 100% of those traffic-image CAPTCHAs
Plants grow in radioactive soil around Chernobyl just fine though.
You see an emaciated man being fed a few grains of rice per day, someone says to stop the policy of feeding the man only a few grains of rice per day, and you argue "we can't stop feeding him these few grains of rice per day, they are the only thing keeping him alive!"

The Jones Act made sense when it was implemented in the 1920s while America was the world's leading ship builder, the shipping industry was heavily subsidized, and there was no alternative to shipping things by water. But after the subsidies stopped, and shipbuilding in america started to lose its competitiveness, and we built a massive interstate highway system that made transport by truck economical, the Jones Act proved far too restrictive. The more expensive domestic water shipping got, the less demand there was for ships, the less demand there was for ships, the more it cost to build ships domestically, the more it cost to build ships domestically, the more expensive domestic water shipping got.

There are alternative and better ways to keep the us merchant fleet alive, and even make it thrive, than keeping the current status quo which is obviously not working.
Depends.

Most nuclear reactors are not considered "renewable", but breeders are.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_proposed_as_rene...
>Do you think AI has changed that in any way? I

I see this type of reasoning in all the AI threads. And yes, I think this time is different.