skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Maybe; obviously it’s unfalsifiable on the internet. The only objective signal I can provide is that I’ve driven hundreds of thousands of miles without a single incident, accident, insurance claim, ticket, warning, speed camera infraction, parking ticket*, or any interaction with law enforcement.

Is that enough to objectively say anything? No idea. But my assessment of myself is as a safe driver with strong self-preservation instincts, and I’m far more comfortable with FSD than I could have imagined myself being prior to getting this car.

(* well, I got a warning from a college library parking lot once, but that was a calculated cost vs. buying a permit. I won that gamble.)
Lot's of Western weapons already combine INS and GPS. I suppose this could be a better alternative to INS.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-158_JASSM

> Guidance system: GPS, INS, IIR
REPL for Dart
Same, my home insurance in the SW is roughly $5000/year and then another $5000/year for wild fire insurance, and another $1000/yr for earthquake insurance... so about $11,000/yr for full home insurance. My home isn't unusually large for the area or anything like that: 4 bedrooms, no basement. We live below our means, so I don't know how most other people afford it.

We need some kind of insurance reform. Insurance works best when there is one extremely large pool of consumers to offset the risk of a catastrophic event in one small area of that pool. The risk pools keep getting smaller as private insurance companies stop offering high risk insurance in markets that suffer from floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, and wild fires. Several state governments have been forced to pick up the slack by offering a small pool of high risk (and therefore high cost) insurance to those residents.

I get it, private insurance companies want to make as much profit as possible and those markets are killing their profits. They should have the right to pull out of those markets if they want, but I would propose that if a private insurance companies should not be able to selectively offer different insurance in different risk markets.

So, for example, if State Farm wants the privilege of selling auto insurance to California's 39 million residents, they also have to offer home/fire insurance (nearly all private insurance companies are not writing new home insurance policies in California due to high risk of wild fires, but they do offer other types of insurance). In other words, it should be all or nothing if they want to participant in any geographic market.

If they still don't want to offer it after such a law, that's ok because then the government's insurance pool can pickup the lower risk insurance (car, home, life, umbrella) to help offset the cost of the higher risk fire insurance (in the California example). The same would be true in other states that have single vertical government pools for different natural disasters (Florida, Texas, Louisiana, Alabama).

I'm sure there are better ideas, but this is just one option that comes to mind.
Flooding is often the bigger problem.
I've been reading digital image processing by Gonzalez and I must be honest: the sheer thickness of the book makes it very hard to handle (especially lying in bed). As others pointed out already, I do miss the ability of search the text. Good book though
Then, given the fact that both you and Mistral LLC modify the program in the exact same way, that portion still holds.

People view weights as an intended obfuscation by the party releasing it. It is not! In fact, it is equally as hard for them to "understand" why a certain value at a certain index is what it is, as it is for you! Just ask Anthropic. They are also doing poke this weight, see what pops with their own models.

Again, that is why I used the analogy above. You are arguing that if someone uses a hardcoded value in their code, and won't share how they derived that value, it somehow isn't open source. That, IMO, is wrong.
As other have said, it's not ideal, but if you are strapped for cash it's well worth considering.
...and then being blown up when the AI company integrates their idea.
All these Libertarians asking for government handouts…
For the iOS version: $6, no subscription, no tracking?

Bought it before even looking at all the screenshots, if for no other reason than supporting developers like this.
Yes, but until they’re autonomous the drones are still heavily subject to jamming of their radio controls. This won’t fix that.

HIMARS, on the other hand, will enjoy the improvements.
The point of this attack vector is to drop patients who are high risk BEFORE they get diagnosed so they can claim it isn't for any existing condition.

This is especially scary in small, closely related communities like Iceland or Utah where a relatively low number of collected samples can be extrapolated to large swaths of the population that didn't give their genetic info away.

Also that protection is relatively new in the US and is constantly being attacked politically so it isn't unreasonable to think about a world where it is removed like other longstanding health related protections.
I’m confused by that. I didn’t ridicule you, no need to make negative assumptions. I’m simply asking what you know about “nefarious purposes”, given that the government certainly doesn’t admit having such intentions.

Okay, yes convictions can be messy and wrong, and juries can believe stuff from TV that isn’t true. Neither of those demonstrates government intent. None of the lawyers nor the juries nor the producers of Law and Order necessarily work for the government. You complained about my use of “imagine” and then threw out a completely hypothetical and vague scenario (three, actually). Even abuses of power by government employed individuals seeking some kind of retribution don’t demonstrate nefarious government purpose on the whole.

There are laws against wrongful convictions and untrue testimony and abuse of power too. Annie Dookhan went to prison, and convictions based on her false evidence are being dropped and overturned. Why do you choose to feel safe with insurance laws made by the government and not trial laws?
The thing is, right now it is artificially cheaper. It is being heavily subsidized by all providers in a race to capture market share. It simply cannot stay this cheap forever at current costs.

Now, if costs change then we have a new story. But that is not guaranteed.
Just thinking here: is it possible that's a catch-all disclosure agreement aimed at employers who require certain vaccinations (I know CVS offers TB shots, for example, which are mandatory for working with some older/vulnerable populations), and this agreement lets CVS send those records to employers when requested?

Either way, it's still a too-broad agreement, but my assumption is that CVS thinks it's easier to opt everyone in by default than to ask patients to opt in as needed, and then inevitably have some patients not opt in when they should have, and then deal with the resulting bureaucratic nightmare when the nursing home they work for calls and demands to see immunization records.
I developed a simple checklist to detect Gen AI use
It would also destroy these companies if they were ever caught lying.
This is also true in Alabama, California, Louisiana, and Texas. In all of these states, the government has been forced to pick up the slack and offer insurance where none of the private insurance companies will.
Crystal Ball Challenge
Themes and plugins are the severe vulnerability of WP Core.
I figure that all motion is curved because all motion is on space bent by gravity or whatever. So motion always involves some acceleration vectors.

Is that... assful?
There's almost no fixed sounds/sampling in it. It has that, but it's a relatively small part that doesn't usually get used in isolation. The sequencing is for notes and time-domain parameterization of the synthesizers.

Regardless it's modular in the software/building block sense, which was what was being referred to in the description.
Scammers are abusing LinkedIn jobs
It appears that they're vacuuming up applicant data by posting jobs as if they're from a certain Page (brand) but in reality they're not affiliated with that brand at all.

Who knows where this data is ending up
>Actually humans are much worse in this regard. The top performer on my team had a divorce and his productivity dropped by like a factor of 3 and quality fell of a cliff.

Wow. Nice of you to see a coworker go through a traumatic life event, and the best you can drudge up is to bitch about lost productivity and decrease in selfless output of quality to someone else's benefit when they are at the time trying to stitch their life back together.

SMH. Goddamn.

Hope your recurrence relation was low bloody stakes. If you spent only two minutes verifying something coming out of a bullshit machine, I'd hazard you didn't do much in the way of boundary condition verification.
Tennessee? The one with the famous river valley that used to catastrophically flood pretty regularly?
I think I'll probably use Lucia for my second attempt, though initially Auth.js looked like it would work more rapidly out of the box.

(I threw out the first attempt, and decided that my most urgent needs, for standing up the beta site and then showing previews for prospective partners, only needed a mix of Nginx HTTP Basic Auth and then simply non-public URLs. Which I could do in minutes, and would also have lower friction for partners to look at. Once authn for normal users percolates back up the project management urgency-sorted backlog, I'll take another quick look at off-the-shelf options, in case there's changes, and then expect I'll probably go with Lucia. Or maybe this Better Auth will be looking like what I want.)
Seeing how they've started having their support team use AI to generate features https://twitter.com/shl/status/1839741937504415934 and their "coding CEO" is using it to cover for their lack of ability to write types in typescript https://twitter.com/shl/status/1839615089592209760 it will be interesting to see where they are in terms of technical debt in 12 months time.
Same with consultancy. There is a huge amount of automation that can be done with current gen LLMs, as long as you keep their shortcomings in mind. The "stochastic parrot" crowd seems an over correction to the hype bros.
I didn't claim Orwell had universally eliminated all traces authoritarianism... it is rising in popularity right now. Only that it may have shifted things enough to keep us from literally living in a 1984-esque society nowadays... enough so that people in this thread and the article above are saying Orwell was "wrong."
Simone Weil body of work about attention can serve as a good starting point in this case. It is an answer that complements the usual disciplinary approach to effort, where a different kind of relation with the subject is developed where the interaction with it starts to be less effortful and more natural.

Take drawing for instance, which is something I practice actively. The act of putting effort in drawing is quite reductive as drawing is a broad area. Sure you can will yourself into drawing 100 faces and you will invariably be better at drawing faces, but it'll take you nowhere nearer being a more creative artist. But sometimes approaching drawing laterally, that is reaching to other techniques, subjects and skills (like shading, drawing lines, using pens and such...) might give you a broader set of tools that in turn will help increase the chances you will find something that catches your attention and absorbs you into it.

Sure you can get lost in the generics with lateral thinking and never reach a level of masterery that might be necessary for you to grow as an artist, so that is why attention isn't a replacement for discipline. You need both. But bottomline is that you also need to develop a relation with the subject that will reduce resistances, increase satisfaction and make it more likely that you will get absorbed by the task at hand.
My house is over 200 years old which isn't really rare for the area of the country where I live. Yes, it's had a sequence of renovation/expansion work over the years--the last of which this summer actually involved chimney brickwork. Why should I care if it lasts 900 years or not?
For those of us who are unfamiliar with the building materials and styles of the area, what was different about those blocks that made them more structurally sound?
In California, we have a fire season.
> when the payload is a 100kt bomb, then 100m is accurate enough

Not accurate enough for counterforce. When a missile silo lid can withstand 600 atmospheres of overpressure, "close enough" isn't good enough.
But android still lacks a forward button, and instead has two buttons (square and circle) that I can never tell apart.
Linux isn’t one target, but a matrix of targets: providing binaries for Linux means picking architectures, libc versions and variants, OpenSSL versions and forks, etc. against which to canonicalize. This also has downstream implications, e.g. a CPython binary with a static build of OpenSSL might contain an OpenSSL vulnerability that CPython is now on the hook for remediating (rather than delegating that remediation responsibility to downstream distributions).

Some of this complexity is also true for Windows, but Linux’s (good!) diversity makes it a bigger challenge.
Martingale is dumb, but i think that's the point, it's telling you what not to do because the only way to recover your initial lost bet is to have a larger bank than the house (and why casinos restrict max bets, $2000 max, $10000 max) - martingale fails.

If you just gotta have a betting system because it helps quell the gambling anxiety or whatever, reverse martingale is fine. I made a video a long time ago about how it works[0] - but in essence, you only stand to lose your initial bet, and you have a bet schedule if you start winning. In "bet units" the way i do it is 1 unit until a win, then for each consecutive win: 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5 (etc). Everything after the first 3 unit bet is the casino's money you're gambling with, which is a good feeling. Note, this implies i consider each "round" that starts after a loss as separate from other rounds, obviously if you lose 20 times in a row and then win 3 games you're not suddenly in the green!

There's no system guaranteed to make you winner, but there are systems to help you lose more slowly, and reverse martingale is my go-to

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwu-5g3q-2E
I think this is reinforced by the stereotype of walls being generally punchable in the US(provided they are not load-bearing).

I have drywall in my apartment, but I would hurt myself trying to punch any of my walls.
Hey Matt, ex-Automattician here. I don't have any comment on the issues themselves (haven't touched PHP or WP since I left) but please consider that the fallout of these actions may hurt your own employees in ways you can't see.

This has turned into a legal situation and I'd have to guess it's making people very uncomfortable. From the outside, it seems to have happened so suddenly that anyone employed at Automattic wouldn't have time to consider their options beforehand. Some people I really respect and enjoyed working with are in a tough spot right now and there's no way they can be fully honest with you given the circumstances.
That's a very fair point! I'm going to add mention of SCIM / directory sync. I feel like it's easiest to stick that into the CISO section, since a big part of SCIM is just the deprovisioning aspect?

And yeah, you're right -- Okta, for example, doesn't let you add SCIM to an OIDC application. It's unfortunate -- there's no deep technical reason you can't mix OIDC and SCIM -- but it is the world we live in.
Is there anything similar for macOS?
Today I had a little epiphany. I was writing some code with ChatGPT and I realized that doing that is like being a manager and having someone reporting to you. You explain your assistant what they need to do and they come back with the code a while later. Except that this assistant is way dumber than a person. But also way, way faster. The assistant makes mistakes, lots of mistakes. But you point out the mistakes, and either they fix them, or eventually you fix them. In the end, if you are a good manager, you get things done. And you get things done 10 times faster than with a human assistant.

Most companies did not figure this out yet. They are concerned that there could be security or privacy vulnerabilities. Or maybe they simply didn't play enough with AI to figure out the best way to extract value. Maybe they think AI is some magic pixie dust that will write a Richard Rhodes-level of a non-fiction book. Or they hope that it will evolve to become something like that. It may or it may not, but right now AI is far from this.

But some companies will figure this out sooner or later.
Well the article began by talking about how before these data training companies would just hire generalists for $2/hr, but now they're hiring degree holders. And it mentions that smart people will be necessary. I'm just saying that degree holding != smart and it's a trap that those data training companies have to avoid.
Why not take advantage of the subsidized price of the “smart” model, never plug it into the internet or connect it to wifi, and just plug in your devices of choice? Best of both worlds.
I used it in a few game jams and can thoroughly recommend it.

The interface might be intimidating at first, but with two wave generators and a couple of patterns you can already conjure a passable background track. A bit more complexity and it can sound pretty good.
I know this sounds heretical, but companies generally do not go against what they say they are doing. They might use clever language or do slimey things, but it's very rare that they will say "We do not do xyz" while they are in fact doing xyz. Especially for big companies.

Reputation has far more value than whatever they gain by lying. Besides, they can just say "We do xyz" because <1% of users read the TOS and less than <0.1% care enough to not use the service.
Permanently screws up your vision, too
But even if everybody moved out of California, there would still be wildfires that blow smoke two states over.
What happened to stop you answering, were you kidnapped by LG?
It's neither anti-capitalist nor anti-communist, just anti-authoritarian.
I feel like I (probably?) agree with what you are saying, but this is a very confusing comment. You started out with an epistemological argument, and then jumped into an analogy that's so close to what is being discussed that on first read I thought you were just confused. I'm not sure anyone can continue the discussion in a meaningful way from what you've written because so many aspects of your comment are ambiguous or contradictory.
Not exactly.

At least in the cybersecurity space, most startups have 3-5 year plans to build their own foundational models and/or work with foundational model companies to not directly compete with each other.

Furthermore, GTM is relationship and solution, and an "everything" company has a difficult time sympathizing or understanding GTM on a sector to sector basis.

Instead, the foundational ML companies like OpenAI have worked to instead give seed/pre-seed funding to startups applying foundational MLs per domain.
Probably so, I think that it's about 50 cubic feet per day, set up a time lapse camera and watch where it goes.
That's because the legitimate insurers ran the numbers, and concluded that they can't provide insurance at a price anyone can afford. So they left the state.

You get what you vote for, and Florida has been consistently voting for denial and corruption and mismanagement.

Instead of doing it's job, and doing anything to mitigate these disasters, or making hard decisions about where people should not be building, the government's too busy attacking homosexuals and the 'woke'. Its what the voters want, it's what the voters get.

The 'price of living in paradise'.
Modern housing can survive very high winds, nothing can survive the flooding though. Look up the regulation changes post Andrew if you’re curious about modern housing in hurricane areas.
Everyone coming to the site right now gets free access.
It's possible they mean the sound as opposed to the look.
Show HN: Iceoryx2 – Fast IPC Library for Rust, C++, and C
Hello everyone,

Today we released iceoryx2 v0.4!

iceoryx2 is a service-based inter-process communication (IPC) library designed
to make communication between processes as fast as possible - like Unix domain
sockets or message queues, but orders of magnitude faster and easier to use. It
also comes with advanced features such as circular buffers, history, event
notifications, publish-subscribe messaging, and a decentralized architecture
with no need for a broker.

For example, if you're working in robotics and need to process frames from a
camera across multiple processes, iceoryx2 makes it simple to set that up. Need
to retain only the latest three camera images? No problem - circular buffers
prevent your memory from overflowing, even if a process is lagging. The history
feature ensures you get the last three images immediately after connecting to
the camera service, as long as they’re still available.

Another great use case is for GUI applications, such as window managers or
editors. If you want to support plugins in multiple languages, iceoryx2 allows
you to connect processes - perhaps to remotely control your editor or window
manager. Best of all, thanks to zero-copy communication, you can transfer
gigabytes of data with incredibly low latency.

Speaking of latency, on some systems, we've achieved latency below 100ns when
sending data between processes - and we haven't even begun serious performance
optimizations yet. So, there’s still room for improvement! If you’re in
high-frequency trading or any other use case where ultra-low latency matters,
iceoryx2 might be just what you need.

If you’re curious to learn more about the new features and what’s coming next,
check out the full iceoryx2 v0.4 release announcement.

Elfenpiff

Links:

* GitHub: https://github.com/eclipse-iceoryx/iceoryx2
* iceoryx2 v0.4 release announcement: https://ekxide.io/blog/iceoryx2-0-4-release/
* crates.io: https://crates.io/crates/iceoryx2
* docs.rs: https://docs.rs/iceoryx2/0.4.0/iceoryx2/
This is great for me for a completely auxiliary reason, which is that I wanted to know whether this was just gonna be a book about programming Fibonacci numbers into types or some ish... and in some ways it's kinda worse, at chapter 9 you are still proving that different takes on x→x+1 are the same. (But using rewrite rules seems kinda interesting in the abstract I guess.)
sc-im it's a true spreadsheet and with gnuplot you can do plots and charts.
It's because the kind of person who understands nuance isn't the kind of person to post in HN flame wars.

The industry is still in it's infancy right now, and stuff can change in 3-5 years.

Heck, 5 years ago models like GPT-4o were considered unrealistic in scale, and funding in the AI/ML space was drying up at the expense of crypto and cybersecurity. Yet look at the industry today.

We're still very early and there are a lot of opportunities that are going to be discovered or are in the process of being discovered.
Anecdotal personal aside: My wife and I considered moving to Tampa some years ago but what scared us away were sinkholes. Hurricanes, etc. were a concern, but when combined with the threat of sinkholes and other natural disasters, it made the home owners insurance more than what we wanted to pay, and so the decision not to move to Tampa became easier.
I don't know if there is causation going on, but I have a feeling that I get more spam calls when I apply for jobs. Just a feeling.
Yes, anyone can steal a car, including a car company. It was not legal for them to do so.
"orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy"?

These are unknown to most Americans.