skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you're a business owner, startup founder, or sales director looking to boost your sales system with AI, this video is for you. I’ll show you exactly how to use 5 AI multi-agent workflows to empower your entire sales pipeline—from research, strategy development, to outreach planning, post-sales call analysis and performance evaluation.

You can try the 5 AI workflows mentioned in the video for free with the links in the video description.

Let me know your thoughts!!
No, vacuum issues are not solved. This will reduce the amount of scanning needed in many cases when vacuuming indexes. It will mean more efficient vacuum and quicker vacuums which will help in a lot of cases.
I might see different models than you (I am based in EU) but I see 4.7” SEs on the Apple store. They’re pretty compact.
Participe do Desafio de SEO no Discord da UpSEO: Aprenda e Pratique com a Comunidade
Se você está em busca de uma maneira prática e interativa de aprimorar suas habilidades em SEO, o Desafio de SEO no Discord da UpSEO é a oportunidade perfeita para você. Com uma proposta inovadora, esses desafios foram criados para simular cenários reais de projetos de SEO, permitindo que você aplique seus conhecimentos em um ambiente controlado e receba feedback personalizado.
Thank god for Meta and Mistral
Human lifespan is too short
> Look at the dependency tree for a next

Looks ok to me: https://npmgraph.js.org/?q=next

Ironically, most of the dependencies are actually Rust crates used by swc and turbopack [1][2]. Try running `cargo tree` on either of those crates, it's enlightening to say the least. And of course, Node has a built in file watcher, and even the most popular third party package for file watching (Chokidar) has a single dependency [3].

[1] https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/07a55e03a31b16da1d085...

[2] https://github.com/swc-project/swc/blob/b94a0e1fd2b900b05c5f...

[3] https://npmgraph.js.org/?q=chokidar
Oh, we know it's weighted connections. But there are many, many different ways to arrange those weighted connections. Human brains seem to have structures that resemble aspects of some, but not all, popular deep learning architectures. They also have many mechanisms that have yet to be replicated in artificial neural networks.

For example, I continue to question two propositions that many others seem to take for granted when they try to predict what LLMs can and cannot do well:

1. LLMs can do generalized symbolic reasoning.
2. If a human does it symbolically, that's how it must be done.

Over the past couple years I've grown to be much more sympathetic to Searle's Chinese Room argument. LLMs are incredibly good at mimicking human behavior and performing tasks that were previously impossible for machines. But as you examine what they're doing more closely you start to see them failing in all sorts of interesting ways that remind you that they're still very much in an uncanny valley of sorts.

Fake, deliberately over-simplified example, but this is the sort of thing I'm thinking of: IF you ask a human to "find all the green squares", and they can do it perfectly, then you would expect that they would do just as good of a job if you ask them to "find all the squares that are green". That sort of expectation does not work with GPT-4. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, and the pattern of when it does and doesn't is fascinating.

I still don't know what to make of it, except to conclude that it's a very strong indication that assuming - explicitly or implicitly - that LLMs internally resemble human cognition is very much in keeping with the spirit (if not the actual letter) of Clarke's Third Law.
Can we all agree that the next time a company announces itself (or a product) as "open", we'll just laugh out loud?

I can't think of a single product or company that used the "open" word for something that was actually open in any meaningful way.
If we make this an analogy to video games, gold pickaxes can usually mine more gold much faster.

What could be short sighted about using tools to improve your daily work?
I think the meaning of "free speech" is critically important here.

Being free to say what you want without government reprisal is (and should be) a fundamental right. In the US, there is significant legal precedent around this, and the instances where your right to free speech is impinged is limited to things like directly inciting violence.

However, if you get "cancelled" by society for something you have said (i.e. you lose business opportunities, friends, your job, you get banned from a forum, etc) then that doesn't qualify as impingement on your "free speech". That's just other people exercising their freedom of speech to tell you that they don't like what you said. Having "freedom of speech" does not mean other people are obligated to listen to what you have to say.

Freedom of speech != Freedom from all consequence for anything you say
Seems to miss the forest from the trees if it is thought about in terms of one person caring or not
Take that to its logical end: a language designed with high-level functions to automate all possible work that, if left to a human to craft, would expose security vulnerabilities.

You know what you have there? A new method for developing software.

If we just switch languages every time we have another class of vuln that we want to eliminate, it will take us 1,000 years to get them all.

Or we could just get them all today by fundamentally rethinking how we write software.

The problem isn't software. The problem is humans writing software. There are bugs because we are using a highly fallible process to create software. If we want to eliminate the bugs, we have to change how the software is created.
Thank you I'll keep these points in mind
This is 85% of what the Mozilla foundation and it's group of companies did. It may not be exact, but to me it rubs me the exact same way in terms of being a bait and switch, and the greater internet being 100% powerless to do anything about it.
What's your use case for system-versioned tables? You could use some extensions like Periods that support bi-temporal tables: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Temporal_Extensions

Or you could use triggers to build one: https://hypirion.com/musings/implementing-system-versioned-t...
Smart TVs really are stupid, but at least netflix ads only show up when you're using netflix. AR glasses would plaster ads all over any show you watch on any platform, as well as on sunsets, walls, family members, etc.
it might just be that I was never in a terribly wire-laden environment -- I'm in college now, where something like 70% of people have airpod-shaped devices in their ears at all times, and even in high school seeing wired earbuds was infrequent. the AirPod aesthetic is the only one I remember wrt listening devices.

I don't know if the same effect would occur with these glasses, though. it seems unlikely that they'll have significant /public/ use amongst young people any time soon. I've never even seen an Apple Vision Pro.
Lucid and Porsche also have comparable internal voltages, but of course they are much more expensive than Hyundai and Kia.
Indeed, you wouldn't really be participating in the "rust ecosystem" at that point. I'm not disputing that it'd be a lot more difficult. The experience would be similar to using C++.
I found the turnover rate of tee shirts surprising. I imagine that my tee shirts get 40 or 45 wears per year, and I very rarely replace them.
That commenter is completely correct: you can be for one policy and against another. It's not cognitive dissonance because I'm for or against certain policies and outcomes. This isn't a team sport. The government isn't the Dallas Cowboys.

Making housing unaffordable = bad. Making healthcare accessible and affordable = good.

Why on earth would you think yo uhad to support the government either 0% or 100% and nothing in between?

It reads like an attempt at hypocrisy baiting because you didn't like what I had to say, not that anything was actually wrong with it. I could be reading that wrong but Ithat's how it reads.
Aerial photos show what being Elon Musk's neighbor can do to your land
Thank you very kindly.
Do these teams run the pipeline on all the commits when you push multiple commits at the same time to your branch?

Say I have an open MR from a branch that I’ve pushed three commits to so far. I pushed these three commits individually and the pipeline ran green each time.

A coworker of mine points out some errors to me.

I have to touch files that I previously touched in the past three commits again.

I am tempted to commit these changes in one commit. But I decide to try git absorb instead.

So instead of adding one fourth, green commit to my MR, my use of git absorb rewrites all three of my previous commits.

But actually, the changes I was about to put in the fourth commit only work when taken together.

Splitting them up and rewriting the previous three commits will result in build failure if you try to build from the new first commit or the new second commit.

I don’t notice that because I’m on the new third commit.

I force push the three new commits to my branch for my MR. Gitlab runs the pipeline on the last of the commits. Everything looks fine to me.

Your team lead approves the MR and pushes the merge button.

Three months later he scolds me for a broken bisect.
> I doubt there are many people in the world whose diets rely on eating octopuses

Probably right (about the relying part), but eating octopuses is fairly common around the Mediterranean, at least the West side of it. Most restaurants have at least one item on the menu involving octopuses in some form or shape./
This is why I advise most folks to not take the latest point release of your language or libraries.

The bleeding edge is where many of the new vulns are. In general the oldest supported release is usually the safest.

The trade-off is when newer versions have features which will add value, of course. But usually a bad idea to take any version that ends “.0” IMO.
It may seem this is snark, but I promise I don't mean it that way: why do you not drink your own champagne? https://github.com/MatrixAI/Polykey/blob/v1.13.0/.github/wor...

I see references to gitlab CI yamls in the source tree, implying you are multi-CI which seems like an extra awesome way to showcase the one source of truth for credentials. Bonus confetti if Ploykey were able to auth as the CI job via https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-for-github-actio... or https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/#id_tokens
Free of cost != free open model. Free of cost means all your requests are logged for Google to use as training data and whatnot.

Llama3.2 on the other hand runs locally, no data is ever sent to a 3rd party, so I can freely use it to summarize all my notes regardless of one of them being from my most recent therapy session and another being my thoughts on how to solve a delicate problem involving politics at work. I don't need to pre-classify all the input to make sure it's safe to share. Same with images, I can use Llama3.2 11B locally to interpret any photo I've taken without having to worry about getting consent from the people in the photo to share it with a 3rd party, or whether the photo is of my passport for some application I had to file or a receipt of something I bought that I don't want Google to train their next vision model OCR on.

TL;DR - Google free of cost models are irrelevant when talking about local models.
If you can tolerate a garbage collector and interpreter overhead, sure. Rust's main niche is things that would have formerly been written in C++.
Amazon APIs are the worst. No comparison. *Rant
Working with amazon API's is single handedly the worst experience I have ever had programming. They are a textbook example of how to build the worst architecture, and their support system is designed to be almost unusable.

LWA is probably the worst Oauth process ever devised. Their indiosyncracies are so poorly thought out, it makes every crappy "wish we had known when we built this" API design look like an A+.

They require the stupidest relationships, they automatically link things you don't want to link, and they cannot link up anything you want to have automated. They cannot manage sessions correctly between the half-dozen different domains you need to constantly login despite requiring you to register on all of them. They have obscure documentation that does everything but accurately describe the process. Verbose, Inaccurate, Poorly formatted, Impossible to scan, search comes up empty on every question, no FAQs worth a damn.

The number of errors is obscene, nothing seems to work, their IDs are impossible to find, and when you find them, they are magically different and don't seem to be linkable. They rely on emails, yet when you use the same email, it doesn't seem to make a difference.

They require you to constantly go into their AWS IAM console for services which never touch AWS (like Ads, Seller Central, Etc.)

Usually you have a secret, an Id, and maybe an extra ID, but with amazon it seems like you need a damn database just to keep track of the IDs. They then add on top of the ids, the most opaque and granular permissions system known to man, and require you to draft policies by hand using their terrible syntax, not to mention you then need to create specific service accounts, and attach them to the policies, and build roles, and assign the policies to work with the Client IDs, Secrets, Shared Secret, Role Id, etc...

Its disgusting. Its entropy in motion. Its what the heat death of the universe looks like.

Seller Central is the worst...SP-API should be burned alive and never talked about again.

Amazon Ads API should be simple, but somehow, their convoluted systems make it nigh impossible to just make anything work without hitting up support who then cannot do anything because they are siloed in a basement of self-flaggelating slaves somewhere in the world. Then you have the regions, the countries, and need to know which god-forsaked place your user is trying to get into.

Its the most misanthropic design ever devised, and clearly no one at Amazon has a clue about anything.

They clearly hired the cheapest architects, and their UI took almost 2 decades to update and when completed looked worse than the old UIs....

Amazon should be ashamed. No one should be proud of their achievements....They should eulugize them and find a new hobby.

Has anyone ever once had a good experience with Amazon's APIs? And if so, how?
Title should be: Japan does all the paperwork and elon wants all the credit
Isn't jumping over a fence more likely than jumping over a wall?
yes, exactly right. it's an encrypted binary on github, but locally (provided you've decrypted it) it'll be unencrypted. If you edit the file locally, it automatically encrypts. It's a neat bit of tech.
> Right, so when you said "there’s no way of meaningfully marking a contactless card as being paired with a railcard", there was nothing of substance to actually support that assertion.

Yes there is, if you bother to actual read my comment, you’ll note I was referring to the ability to store the railcard flag on the actual card, so it’s easy for the RID to know if person is travelling with a discount.

> What you've proven to me is that TfL are in exactly the position where they could deliver this if they wanted to and put their minds to it, but it nonetheless hasn't happened.

Well that’s simply not true[1]. Also you might have been aware of a recent global pandemic that occurred, and completely flattened TfLs finances, and has basically forced them to abandon any future looking projects, and focus on just keeping the lights on. You seem to expect an awful lot from a transport agency that just spent 3 years fighting for its own survival, while central government did everything in its power to destroy it.

> I am quite cynical about TfL, yes, and suspect that they just see this as likely to cause a financial hit when it comes to revenue, which is probably why it hasn't been prioritised. The status quo is a convenient one. I'm sure it'll happen one day when the tech debt of Oyster forces it to happen, but it won't be done proactively for passenger benefit.

That’s unfortunate, but it say more about you, than it does about TfL. Go and spend any serious amount of time in any other major city, and you’ll be much more grateful for what TfL provides. Even more so when you realise that TfL is the only transit agency in the developed world that is inexplicably required to cover all its costs from the fair box and advertising. Even US transit agency, in a country notorious for its strong cultural dislike for public transit, provides more government support to its transit agencies than the UK does to TfL.

[1] https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/more-railway-stations-a...
This in and of itself very likely creates a bias against the defendant. For me, there is overwhelming evidence that many innocent people have been executed. To support the death penalty, you seem likely to either not believe in systemic injustice (which means you are also probably more likely to believe flimsy testimony) or accept that innocent lives are a tolerable tradeoff to ensure that some people are executed for their crimes. Both groups seem more likely to convict to me than a random sample.

Personally, I also feel that it is morally wrong to give jurors life and death decision making power. The jurors themselves can be deeply harmed by this if they later learn that they convicted a defendant on the basis of false evidence.

I think the bigger problem though is that the death penalty is too abstract. There are many people who believe that certain crimes are worthy of execution. I don't personally agree, but I accept other's beliefs on that point. But even if I grant the righteousness of execution in certain cases, it seems nearly impossible to implement justly and without heavy costs to society. This includes the costs to the people who must carry out the execution as well as the exceedingly high financial costs relative to other forms of punishment.
I’m glad that my mind tends to instantly shut down anyone who starts to fast-talk me or pressure me into something. I don’t any big choices without giving it a week to cogitate in my brain. If they can’t wait on that then well it’s of high probability it’s a scam/partial truth/ReallyBadChoice(TM)
It's too bad there aren't more software projects (and jobs) like this.
Discussion (167 points, 2 days ago, 134 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41629620
I would add a bit of nuance to this. I always say there are three parts of any scam:

1. Claim of authority (timeshare purchase agent in this case)
2. Call to action (send me just a bit of money to sell your timeshare)
3. Sense of urgency (buyer will go with someone else if you don't act now)

You'd be surprised how often all three of these are present in a phishing attack of any variety.
Like CEOs at the golf course or country club!
Facebook's ongoing behavior towards its users is consistent with the original quote. I don't see any evidence that something has changed besides PR slop.
From Gatsby gridlock to Astro bliss: my personal site redesign
Ask HN: Cheapest LLM Hosting Solution?
Evaluating hosting an LLM model on the cloud (variation of qwen2).

Has anyone compared the cost between providers? Is there somewhere that does it? Cost is probably the #1 factor here? Is ChatGPT api way cheaper? Thanks
The article has not. Its discussion is heavily couched in exactly that example.
Ok, but ads aren't going to fundamentally shift away from being a method to induce people to consume unnecessarily in 300 years. That's just what they are.
is there a good source that shows which were dismissed as meritless vs ones dismissed due to lack of standing?
dang it. www.podsnacks.org.
Almost all modern cars have a way of providing or grabbing location data, however most manufactures do not "Spy" on your car by default, this would violate CCPA, colorados privacy act, GDPR... ETC. The users need to opt-in to telematics data. For example in Hyundai case when you create a "Blue link" account and accept their terms of service you are connecting whatever vehicle you have verified on your account to their telematics system, and subsequently opting in to tracking.

Manufactures like VW/Audi place an opt out within the vehicle itself so if you opt out of telematics in the vehicle you are in a full privacy mode and the manufacture cannot get the data or override this request. This covers the scenario if other "Users" of the vehicle are driving and would choose to opt out outside of the main users/owner.

So some bake it into your app registration and signup, and some leave it in the vehicle. The gist is you can opt out, and if the manufacturer does not respect that you have grounds to sue, Currently there is a lawsuit against GM/Caddy because a user did not opt-in to Usage Based Insurance, but their information was captured and brokered blocking them from acquiring new insurance.
It's a great question, and I don't pretend to have an answer. Also, I was thinking bit more broadly than just Hoodmaps -- the amplification of nonsense (being generous here, amplification of vile, harmful misinfo is more like it) has been an issue across the "social" media landscape for years. Same goes for the corporate-y "sanitization" of everything into bland lumpy paste -- it's not a new phenomenon.

The one common thread I see there is ~money~ -- both the dark patterns that frontload incendiary garbage into feeds, and the ultra-conservative (as in, cautious and risk-averse) culture of large corps that stains their products, these are in effort to maximize profits / minimize losses.

It would be inaccurate to say for example "nobody wants to see musk's inane drivel" -- there are probably a handful of stans, sycophants, grifters and trainwreck-watchers who follow that aberrant humanoid. But the mutant has a megaphone, and projects his mental illness larger than life, on one of the major online platforms that reaches tens of millions. This is the sort of amplification I see as being harmful. It's out of proportion, and many of the users of that platform seem to reject it.

A little website tagging neighbourhoods? As long as no one there has the power to override what people put in and force their own individual opinion to the front? Let it be! So what if some nancy wrings her hands that a neighbourhood is tagged with a racial slur? Maybe it was someone from the very neighbourhood who tagged it as such. Who draws the line and where, regarding what is permitted? If something really transgresses against major social mores, people will shun it.

We've got to remember we don't all ever agree on nothing -- different groups, different cultures hold different values. Don't muzzle people because you don't like what they say -- but at the same time, don't multiply their voice; especially not those who aim to start fights.
bi tooling is usually report/analysis builders, intended to be consumed by.. business users. More importantly, they're usually also meant to be used by business users to build their own reports in the first place -- although in practice it often ends up going back to IT to maintain/update anyways. Basically anything that competes with excel pivot tables is a bi tool.

OLAP/cubes usually underpins bi tooling, since the usecase is almost entirely across-the-board aggregations.
The over the air updates to my 2015 Tesla S have added features as well as fixing bugs.
Their point still stands though. If the output should be reviewed by a lawyer, then the penalty should be all the profits (and maybe also the wages of the CEO) to deter others from doing the same, and ensure that they don't continue in the belief that an occasional 1-2% is perfectly acceptable 'cost of doing business'.