skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Reverse proxy allows some operational flexibility:

1) you can share multiple apps or sites with one server listening on port 443/80.
2) You can redirect to another backend on your infrastrcture
3) You can enforce certain login/sso/restrictions
4) You can configure all these things in one place.

Of course, if you don't need all that, then it's somewhat moot.
Boy, not from the outside, though. There was a guy wearing one on my last flight and it’s ugly and it’s super weird to see someone “doing stuff”. All the hand waving and stuff. I can’t imagine wearing one in public. But I’m old
Vultr Advances Global AI Cloud Inference with AMD Instinct MI300X
I am strongly interested but I would never buy the first iteration of anything like this
I don't see Nvidia canibalizing their server cash cow, but AMD has much less to lose and more to gain.
I think the real killer use case of AR glasses is when multiple people have them and can look at shared 3D content. The TV show "The First" (sadly cancelled) did a good job of showing use cases for this.
Discussion (18 points, 9 hours ago, 11 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41645642
I’ve heard this promise so many times that I’m just a bit skeptical.
As someone who does not wear these things; it is not fine.
I think you’re right, it was probably the changing from nothing.
What are you on about? C is more useful day-to-day than the vast majority of languages. Learning it is hardly a waste of time.
And it's easy to add a new station to PlugShare. I've done that before.
I find that in AI / ML / computer vision, the thinking horizon has shrunk a lot. Reviewers prize straightforward incremental work that nevertheless beats the SOTA. New problem formulations are too hard to decipher and understand deeply and nobody has time nowadays. Everything is super sped up. There's a fire hose of papers coming out that all do slightly different things, or the same concurrently.

In this area even the best, most respected professors don't have long term laid out research plans. Grant plans must exist but they never quite pan out that way. Researchers in this environment are very reactive and it's all about being fast. Diffusion is popular? Then let's do diffusion for [my specialty], or transformers for [X]. Or combine LLM with [my last topic]. People are constantly pivoting and jumping from one opportunity to the next. In my experience gone are the days where you could carve out a niche and work in peace on it for 4-5 years and have a consistent overarching story in your PhD.
https://retejs.org
> Pancake lens allow you to make smaller headsets and typically result in better image quality. The downside is they lose a lot of light so you need very bright screens.

Source and detailed explanation with pictures: https://old.reddit.com/r/OculusQuest/comments/14lu4wz/whats_...
Not yet -- it's our vision to automate stuff like that!

> Edit: And "to figure out what edits I need to make" is done by any ol' compiler, no?

Kinda? There are cases where you have to drill data down into the callstack (i.e. pass data from above). There are folks who have gone down this path before: https://www.jetbrains.com/help/resharper/Refactorings__Chang... but we intend to automate it even more and show it to the user in an organized way for them to handle large-scale "refactors".
Resell is the real value, but you need to make sure you understand the limitations to benefits as only people that have bought enough points directly get access to certain benefits such as lounges.

And really the whole thing only makes sense if you pay upfront without a loan.

I've priced it out a few times and for me it doesn't make sense despite staying at WDW ~ 4+ weeks a year.

But when compared to other timeshares, it's not a total lock in and Disney has apparently started buying back contracts if you wanted out.
There’s a good reason for that. Ad companies don’t get much love from HN.
I am one of the people who own and enjoy using an Apple Vision Pro. A year ago, my wife and I welcomed our daughter to the world. Having a device that can be interacted with hands-free and produces no outward light has been useful more than once in the last year. A front-facing camera pointing at the world around me lets me share my girl with family far away in a first-person POV. There are use cases beyond Zooming from a coffee shop for which devices like these are welcomed innovations and definitely appealing. And that doesn't even count that I just genuinely like working with my headset on at my desk. I'm a spatial thinker, so arranging things I need around me makes sense.
Masimo Has a New Boss
You can "Decline optional cookies" and browse without being logged in, at least in Europe. (Just tested in a private window, FB/Meta is only allowed in a separate container on my computer.)
No true hologram afaik. They mentioned waveguides. Looks same tech lineage than hololens / magic leap.

I think Microsoft was first using holographic buzz word for these non-holographic displays

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens

“holographic device”
Those are also creepy; it does not mean that it takes away the creepiness of this.
Yeah, I guess I meant "for release 0.999_001" [1] or something rather than a strict interpretation of "to begin with."

> But yeah, you're not wrong that it's got a lot of inspiration from things like mobx and rxjs.

Please figure out how to deploy a subset of the reactive graph into a k8s operator. It'll be a really cool feature and also it'll probably save me a bunch of time when I want one of those if I can crib from your work :D

I ... bah. I am really looking forwards to getting into another of our involved coversations about this stuff but I'm too tired today and besides I definitely do need to mainline your docs first. I'll probably see you on twitter first with the assumption you'll end up chasing me onto Discord sooner or later ;)

[1] please interpret that in terms of how you remember me (ab)using version numbers ;)
> Are people still using Kyoto Cabinet in new projects?

Cloudflare used to use Kyoto Cabinet[1] and moved to LMDB[1] in 2020; other implementations that I'm familiar with (but don't have a link to share) also use LMDB.

> Are people still using DBM-style storage generally?

It's fairly common in these scenarios, as well as the underlying key-value store for popular software like Consul[3].

[1] https://blog.cloudflare.com/kyoto-tycoon-secure-replication/

[2] https://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-quicksilver-configur...

[3] https://github.com/hashicorp/consul/issues/8442
If you didn't care enough about it to write it, why should your fellow players care enough to read it?
Link with product info and pricing? Or can you share that info?
Yeah. Especially when I'm trying to see what makes some query slow.
Electron feels odd compared to native applications, and resource usage is pretty insane. A single Electron app takes more memory than everything running in my machine, including an X server, PipeWire, plus an Emacs and an XTerm instance. Well done native applications are really refreshing, and they don't spin my computer fans all the time.

Macs had a very healthy boutique and indie app scene at some point, with lots of attention to detail, because users were happy to pay for good quality software. The Omni Group, Panic, Cultured Code, etc. all delivered outstanding things. GNOME 2 was pretty nice too in its own ways. After a lot of churn and changes, it is again re-emerging as a noteworthy desktop ecosystem. See https://apps.gnome.org.
Forget everything, we're doing 5 chips
Why "of course"?

And what exactly "dealing with a landlord" means is strongly dependent on the legislation you live in. For instance, when I lived in Germany, I learned that tenants have extremely strong rights (compared to the US) which perhaps partly explains why most people over there rent. (Another explanation is that many people cannot afford to pay for a mortgage...)
Eliminating Memory Safety Vulnerabilities at the Source
Boquerones en vinagre. Delicious cold on some bread.
Yes the visualization should work!
I'm very skeptical that an LLM can derive any meaningful spec from a non-trivial codebase.

Specifications describe the behavior of the system, but most of all it defines wanted outcomes and edge cases. This is hard.

I'd like to see the results if anyone can make this work! It would make my job orders of magnitude simpler.
Haven't written anything up about it, but the code is here: https://github.com/mkaic/dagnabbit. I haven't gotten it to work particularly well yet, so I don't have any demos posted.

If I ever get it to a point where I feel proud of the result, I'll write a blog post about it and submit it to HN.
It's not hearsay to go to the witness stand and say the defendant told you something. That defendant is there in court and is able to defend themselves.
Why can't this be an extension? I love the idea and can perfectly imagine this inside a tab of the editor area. This would allow for multiple haystack tabs as well, so switching contexts would be seven easier.
Having to install another IDE (even if it is based on vscode) is a bit of a bummer for me. None the less, keep it up!
For someone so in touch with what studies say you seem to have a very inaccurate view of the political leanings of academics

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GYOm6ciXcAAZ0vl?format=jpg&name=...

You see, all the fake fields of studies are field with leftists. And sure, you might say democrats aren't leftists, which is what every dumbass marxist says.
My claim is that the pictures themselves are probably only worth $100k or so, and you can read the comment again to see how that tracks semantically. The experiments, maybe ten million unless they can demonstrate that they have some sort of value.

A "viable billion dollar mission" includes all sorts of other things that are of value, including developing capabilities to do things that are strategically important, which I would claim is where a large majority of that billion dollars comes from. Similarly, I would expect that JPL would very much inflate the value of their own work. Everyone does.

Also, I see "incapable of being measured" with "broadly : indefinitely extensive" tacked on in the MW definition. There is no requirement there that "immeasurable" mean "large", just "incapable of being measured" with the expectation that it is used when describing things that are extreme. My most recent use of "immeasurable" was "immeasurably small" which I'm sure you would agree is a proper use.
Very good article. Can anyone more familiar with quantum physics confirm if the analogies and descriptions are mathematically sound? I didn't get the vibe that the author was uncareful.

I know there are many reasons to be cautious, but this discovery has me really excited for the potential to witness incredible new leaps in science.
Great now its even easier to join video meetings from my desk at the office
I think this is the most desperate and pathetic claim for a long time. I mean, it's Google. Google is a dead company. They destroyed the only hand that feeds them. The search engine. They did this on purpose to increase the number of searches. And then I really hate what they done to Google play.

As a senior Azure architect. We try to run as much as possible on Linux to avoid licenses. I don't even understand how you end up running Windows Server on GCP. Never ever heard of a corp that does this. Also, most of the new stuff from MS is platform independent.
I think there is a bit left out - I expect that the cookie was restricted in some other way. Either the logged in experience was on a different sub-domain (e. g. `app.breakthroughjuniorchallenge.org`) or the cookie was restricted to a sub-path (e. g. `Path=/app`). In either case, changing the scope of the cookie would make it available where it wasn't before.
The display specs are pretty impressive. Mostly superior to the Valve Index, which costs $500 without the controllers ($1000 with the controllers and trackers) versus $320 for the Question 3S (including controllers!).
Are there are good unofficial gcc plugins/extensions out there? It would be cool to extend C with a thing or two without adopting a full blown compiler like C2 or C3.
I see your point, but isn't decoder part of implementation for ISA just like compiler, runtime/vm, stdlib and more... are for programming language?
I've returned my Quest 3 because it gave me a headache, dry eyes and the passthrough was not at all like advertised.

Saw of people watching there phone screen, that was not possible with my unit.
Back in 1994 the United States filed a civil antitrust complaint against Microsoft for their practice of entering long term contracts with PC manufacturers in which the PC manufacturer would pay Microsoft a fee to license their OS based on the number of systems they sold, regardless of whether or not that system actually came with Windows. This of course made it more expensive to engage Microsoft's competitors such as IBM's OS/2.

PC manufacturers that didn't enter into these deals would have significantly higher licensing costs which put them at a disadvantage to other PC manufacturers, this of course rapidly distorted the market and stunted the spread of alternatives.

Microsoft's cloud tactics of today are so similar that I'm actually surprised that they'd try something like this again.
I don't see how this is bad news. The better humanity does at treating acute crises, the smaller a share of deaths they will account for; but the overall death rate must remain fixed at 100%, so other causes will naturally increase by equal proportion. The best situation we could possibly hope for would be chronic diseases causing 100% of all deaths globally, as a function of old age!
Not only that. I remember when spyware was considered as bad thing. Now every other page is asking you to by spied on like it is something normal.
+1 for mathematical Platonism
Showcasing a product where visual fidelity is the entire experience with embedded 12fps gifs is definitely a decision.
The older I get, the less I want Facebook to get older
Ask HN: How to Deal with IT Gatekeepers?
At a few F500 companies now, I've sought to automate repetitive tasks, which often requires access to APIs and/or databases. When I submit requests, I'm often either rebuffed by an outright rejection of the request, or a lengthy conversation questioning why I want or need to do something. Once I provide the reasons for why I want to do something, the conversation typically turns into a matter of compute resource protectiveness or IT saying they're working on similar automation, which never comes. It's like a flow chart in which options lead to a rejection.

How have you handled this sort of bureaucracy?
Being able to see their facial expressions and gestures. The usual reasons.
I don't notice any latency whatsoever. If you're not exaggerating and are genuinely experiencing "brutal" latency, then something is definitely wrong with your setup.
I think adding a rubber nose and a fake mustache would make them perfect!
The Valve Index is five year old hardware inexplicably still being sold at its original launch price to this day, it really isn't relevant anymore.

Even the Quest 2 had a higher display resolution, four years ago, for $300 at launch.
For Android users wanting to use Open Charge Map, I recommend using the EVMap app instead of the official one. It doesn't let you see or post comments, but you can see pictures if available. Much smoother and also tries to show the charger status:

- https://ev-map.app/

- https://github.com/ev-map/EVMap

I only use OCM when I want to add a picture or read/add a comment.
If you structure your directories sensibly, you can get the same effect/value prop in every IDE and dev env.

Or is there a deeper experience/knowledge that gets unlocked coding in this paradigm?
No. How do you enable payment for such normal sockets? Even if you figure out a way to do that, the amount of payment for electric bikes is so tiny that just to cover credit card processing fees would require electric bike users to pay for exorbitantly expensive electricity.
1832 x 1920 is the same resolution from the Quest 2, and fresnel lenses may come from that as well.

That effectively means it's Quest 2 optics with a Quest 3 GPU and color passthrough.

The premium Quest 3's lenses and displays are no doubt better, but for the entry level hardware this is still a good upgrade.

The better GPU will mean it doesn't need to lean as hard on "foveated rendering" where the center of the screen is at high resolution and everywhere else is blurry and upscaled with unreadable text. I say "foveated" in quotes because it doesn't know where your eyes are looking, only how your head is oriented, so if you want to see something in detail you need to point your face at it.
I just want glasses to replace screens, so I can make a proper cyberdeck.
You can check out buying options on platforms like Google, Amazon, and Apple, all of which provide sample chapters for you to review before purchasing. Thanks for checking it out!
Use my meta ray bans many times a week since last October ..just in Banff canoeing and was able to continue rowing while filming.

Watching content & or working using smart glasses doesn't make sense to me but using them to ask it count how many ppl in a room, keep the score of my pickleball game or whatever game that involves using vision to keep score and many other innovative ideas are useful to exciting prospects personally.

Yet overall my Ray bans are a great pair of sunglasses that let me take pics or video either hands free or not. They need improvement when using to talk on phone and upon a year of using them smart glasses I don't think will replace the smartphone as u cant take selfies with them.
I see from the latter link that the last update was in February 2024 — glad that the project is still alive!
I write when I've had something on my mind for a while and I need to get it out of my head. Also helps me to work through it in more detail.

I've had a few things get picked up here that got some good attention but many people complain that what I write is too long. It's usually too long because I'm trying to complete the thought for my own sake. One of these days, I could honestly see writing a book because those long posts are usually shortened as much as I can.
> Glasses that let you record people without their awareness / consent?

Thats basically all cameras. AR is coming, whether meta makes it work or not.

There are ways around this, but they either require a massive public backlash, or actual regulation that requires explicit and provable permission before non-anonymised pictures/captures can be taken.
Another good replacement for capstone/keystone based on LLVM is nyxstone https://github.com/emproof-com/nyxstone
VS Code extensions are pretty limited - you can override the renderer for an editor tab, but if you want multiple things within a custom interface to be treated as first-class editor tabs by the larger environment (and by the larger extension ecosystem), that's not really possible. Forks are a reasonable step as long as they don't fall behind!
you can use sqlite as a dbm db
https://docs.python.org/3.13/library/dbm.html#module-dbm.sql...
It still looks goofy and takes me a moment to register they're talking to someone on a phone when they breeze by.
How about an executable specification?
Yep. It's kosher. If you don't like it, don't use Windows Server.
Only two rules when building a startup:

1. Don’t run out of money.

2. Don’t get sued by the government.
Drugs button popover – HTML Accessibility
That's exactly how it worked, hand rolled FFT and filtering following the method in "Numerical Recipes for C"
The downgrade in lens type is a huge difference in user experience. Pancake lens is strictly superior than fresnel in almost all aspects, unless you want OLED. In the case of 3S you don't get OLED anyways, so it's a pretty big downgrade.
It still catches me off guard sometimes. Just a personal opinion, but it's a bit offputting because it's distracting to hear only one half of the conversation. My brain is dragged unwillingly into filling in the other half. Also we tend to talk kinda obnoxiously loud on the phone. But I guess that applies equally well to all public phone conversations.
seems very relevant to me. Isn't it capitalism that reduces our value to $s? And thus our art is only valuable as content?
I think this is why they filed in the EU instead of the United States.

The EU has demonstrated that they'll narrow the boundary of the market and ignore marketshare if they see there is an EU-centric advantage to be had.

This also lends into Google's opening wording where they frame the behaviour as a threat to the EU, rather than a threat to Google's Cloud business.

Or a more controversial take: The EU has demonstrated a naive over-eagerness to legislate in tech matters despite the absence of harm. (Versus a more conservative USA that is wary of upending industries without proven harm.)
Prototypes are expensive and as such difficult to justify if the technology doesn't look promising. I'm sure you're aware there's a new self-proclaimed miracle tool appearing in this ecosystem every day. My point is that there is a severe lack of information to make an educated decision here.

I think it's fair to say most people will be interested in potentially replacing Terraform with this. Do you have a comparison against Terraform? Is there a guide on how to import resources into SI?
These extensions are Ada features.

Ada has:

- Labels in the form of: Call (Param_A => 1, Param_B => "Foo");

- Underscores can be used in numbers of any base: X : Integer := 1_000;

- Nested subprograms

- Range based tests
I remember when the iPad came out and everyone was making jokes about it. No one would image a phone would be a primary computing device. Don't know if glasses are the next major step, but a handheld phone being a computing device is a transitory thing.
It's worth checking every link you get even if it's from a trusted source, like GitHub... and to be able to restore the data, it's worth having a backup
Not if you consider that a lot of front end developers today started learning web development through JavaScript.

I started around 2000, when people were still using tables for layout and CSS was pretty new. If you wanted interactivity you relied on the built-in tools on the web because there was no other choice (apart from something more extreme like Java applets or Flash).

Today’s web developer starts with something like React, learns JSX instead of HTML and doesn’t need the form tag or checkboxes/radiobuttions/select because they have useState, onClick and className to highlight whatever they think is active. I’ve been working as a React consultant for +6 years now, and every PR I see has the same issues.

I wish I was lying about the onClick on anchor tags, and for primary navigation it’s usually done right. But once they see a block link that contains multiple components (a “card”) the mind always seems to jump to onClicks that call navigate.

A more advanced error is when something is an anchor, they correctly implement the a tag with an onClick and preventDedault, but they forget to check if the user is holding down shift, hyper or control or if they pressed any other than the primary mouse button to try and open the link in a different tab/window.

Semantics in general is a lost art as well. A Text component that only returns p or spans is used for titles, they don’t consider hierarchy at all.

To be fair, there is so much logic in the client now that I understand that people with different ambitions have taken an interest in it. The only problem is that companies just blindly hire for front end developers without considering the different expertises.

I think this is the root cause for a lot of the complaints HN has about JS. I want to build good UI and UX, but there’s so much other work and configuration that I’m expected to work on, in a limited timeframe to not ruin my velocity that I just never get to it.