skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It’d be helpful to update the blog post to make that more clear. The example focused on “constructing the response” in parallel with making the write durable, so confusing it with a response gate is an easy mistake to make.
> Shared memory works as a transport if you either assume that all parties are trusted (in which case why do IPC in the first place? Just put them in a monolith), or you do hardcore capturing (make a copy of each message in the framework before handing it off). Their web page mentions zero copy, so it's probably not the second one.

This is an extremely puzzling comment. I can think of thousands of such cases.

First, there are many reasons to split your program into processes instead of threads (e.g. look at browsers) so even if you have a monolith, you may need IPC between trusted parties simply because of software engineering practices. As a more extreme example, if you're writing code in a language like Python, where multi-threading is a huge liability due to GIL and the standard solution is to just use multi-processing, you'll need a channel between your processes (even if they're just fork()'d) and so you need to use something like filesystem, unix pipe, postgresql, redis, some ipc lib (e.g. TFA)... whatever as a way to communicate.

Second, your comment implies there is no scenario where implementing two separate programs is preferable to building a monolith. Even though you believe in general monoliths are better, it doesn't follow that they have to always be the right approach for every software. You may have a program that requires extremely different computational techniques, e.g. one part written in Prolog because it needs logical constraint satisfaction solving, or one part needs X language because you have to use a specialized library only available in language X, or you may need one part of your program to be in C/C++/Go/Rust for improved latency, or you may need part of your program in "slow" Y language because every other codebase in your company is written in Y. This language barrier is simply one reason. I can come up with many others. For example, parts of the software may be developed by two separate teams and the IPC is decided as the interface between them.

Long story short, it's pretty normal to have a monolithic codebase, but N processes running at the same. In such cases since all N processes are written by you, running in hopefully-trusted hardware, using an IPC framework like this is a good idea. This is not necessarily the most common problem in software engineering, but if you do enough systems programming you'll see that a need for IPC between trusted processes is hardly niche. I personally reach for tools like iceoryx quite frequently.
There’s certainly something to be said for the fact that shoplifting has entered the Overton window in the last few years. I see on tiktok probably weekly videos of people suggesting that shoplifting is not very serious, how to nick things at self checkout, how stealing from faceless corporations is hardly stealing at all…

I feel like as a whole people are more likely now than in the recent past to see their relationship with corporations as being adversarial and this is just one facet. It is hard to blame anyone for feeling this way, as consumers and employees are becoming more disempowered. Additionally, the shopping experience has become much less personal. It is hard to justify stealing from a shop where the owner goes to your church and knows your dad. But with a multinational company where you can’t even get a real person on the phone, maybe that feels different for some people.

I’m not saying I agree, but the more people who think companies are “evil”, the more types of disobedience will be seen as reasonable.
How much do astronauts get paid anyways? According to chatGPT they don’t get overtime pay though might receive bonuses for situations like this.
nice to hear that, thanks!
>I've been told that flex circuits are far easier to pass EMC testing

That’s not correct. It really depends what application, industry and type of testing.

I would say generally it’s the opposite due to worse shielding properties (and worse pi), but it’s a huge oversimplification that’s extremely dependent on application and testing type
I've tried Crystal half a dozen times but always ran into some inconsistency or bug that became a show-stopper. Sigh. I hope maybe the next time it will be reliable and usable.
Here in the Netherlands we have the Kindertelefoon (Children’s Telephone), a free hotline for children to call and talk about anything. [1] I never called when I was young, but I think it’s great that such an initiative exists.

Even for adults, there are such initiatives, such as the Luisterlijn [2] and MIND Korrelatie [3].

[1] https://www.kindertelefoon.nl/

[2] https://www.deluisterlijn.nl/

[3] https://mindkorrelatie.nl/
I'm gonna have to call in my NASA moon rover expert. Best I can do is $40.
Glad to hear! I spent a bunch of time on that post so I was hoping someone would read it :) Good luck with your projects
Avala Tower
Cellular Exploit on a Global Scale: The Rise and Fall of the Control Protocol [pdf]
Thanks for the pointer!

"Call by meaning" sounds exactly like LLMs with tool-calling. The LLM is the component that has "common-sense understanding" of which tool to invoke when, based purely on natural language understanding of each tool's description and signature.
The first time I saw a session replay of all the mouse movements and input of a user on their own fucking computer that some marketing website-spyware had recorded was the moment I decided the Internet was a mistake.
Love it. I really wish classical mirrorless camera makers would get their head out of their collective asses, and make a camera that is not stuck in the 80-s mentality.

Give me a large sunlight-readable touchscreen, with multitouch. Also GPS, WiFi, Bluetooth, and 5G/LTE for connectivity and geotagging. Add automatic uploads to Google Photos, iPhoto, WebDAV, etc. Put in a small editor for on-device photo touchups.

Also, ditch the old-timey film-camera look. I don't need 15 physical switches, most of which should be automatic anyway. A physical button for the shutter and an analog knob for fine tuning are fine, but I don't need a manual switch for AF/MF. Or a "shutter delay" selector that is too easy to accidentally bump.
Many resistive materials, especially those that are semiconductors, have changes of resistivity caused by mechanical strain.

This so-called piezoresistive effect is frequently used for measuring the deformations of various objects, by attaching piezoresistive wires to them, which can measure for instance the amount of bending of the object.

Such a flexible integrated circuit might also have changes in the resistance of the transistor channels or of the interconnection traces, which will change the maximum permissible clock frequency. If an RC oscillator is used to generate a clock signal, its frequency will change with the bending of the circuit, more likely due to variations of the resistance than of the capacitance, because it is not likely for the bending to cause large variations in the thickness of the dielectric of the capacitors or in the area of the electrodes, even if that is also possible.

The variable capacitors whose capacitance is changed by twisting have this behavior because their electrodes overlap only partially and the twisting changes the area of the overlapping region. No such thing happens when twisting or bending a normal capacitor.
Fun with MiniMax API
Edmonton, Canada: https://data.edmonton.ca/Environmental-Services/Trees-Map/ud...

The city also has some foraging clubs that are quite active. There are many more things to pick in the city's forests and parks: asparagus, strawberries, raspberries, currants, mushrooms, etc.
Show HN: Turn your favorite Album Covers into Animations
It's available in the UK as of yesterday, but is it available in the EU yet? Doesn't look like it, reading https://x.com/openai
Your reading comprehension is being interrogated because, in speaking of the article as though it did not say several of the things it says, you make such questions seem necessary.

You are being told that the question you asked is "not even wrong": it is without meaning and so not meaningfully answerable, because it could only be asked at all from such a fundamental ignorance of the American situation around poverty that to attempt to even explain the misapprehension would require more the scope of an undergraduate course than an HN comment.

I would not usually be so blunt, but in this case meeting an apparent need for directness seems worth the risk of a rude impression. If you need it put still more plainly, though, I'm afraid I cannot help you.
In the Acemoglu and Restrepo model, a low interest rate results in automating all current tasks, while a higher one results in new labour-intensive tasks being added to the model economy as fast as old ones are being automated away.

(incidentally, they also had some regime in which automation was predicted to increase wages, but I didn't read that closely)

riffing* off https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week121.html I think decategorisation is about forgetting the differences between the maps into and out of two apples and two oranges (and even two fruits), leaving us with just a (relabelable) set of cardinality 2?

(via JvN's construction: {∅,{∅}})

EDIT: taking connected components of the projection down to the "largest groupoid" sounds very similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_component : the finest partition (here, of objects from the original category) that is totally ordered by reachability (direction of arrows from the original category).
To have the same build system for many languages with support for distributed artifacts caching and strong guarantees about build reproducibility if used correctly.

But yes, it’s like a lot of things whose need is born of scale. If you really needed it, it would be obvious to you and if you use it without needing it, it’s going to be painful and difficult to understand.
Adding covariates to the post analysis can reduce variance. One instance of this is CUPED by there are lots of covariates which are easier to add (eg request type, response latency, day of week, user info, etc).
Natural radioactive decay is also an example of fission - just not a fission chain reaction (… except when it is! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklo )
Both a NATO summit and Ukraine's popular uprising against a russian-backed ruler are none of russia's business, as are most things that happen outside of russia. You may recall that russia has held a few summits and revolutions of their own, and none of them led to Ukraine attempting to genocide russia.

What russia calls a "provocation" is no excuse for russia's invasion and subsequent 3rd genocide of Ukrainians (the 1st being the russian-perpetrated Holodomor starting in 1932, the 2nd being the russian deportation of Crimean Tatars starting in 1944).

Had russia stayed within their borders and minded their own business, the current russian war of genocide against Ukraine would not exist. Had russia historically not been evil to its neighbors (example: the Katyn Massacre in 1940), its neighbors wouldn't seek protection from russia.

The hollow russian talking point the other poster pointed out, is that russia being upset at something that happened in another country which has nothing to do with it, is somehow justification for russia perpetrating a war of genocide. It isn't. That's why nearly every country in the world voted to reject russia's excuses such as the ones you cite, and condemn russia's actions in multiple United Nations votes, and why the ICC issued arrest warrants for putin and his war crimes.
If something opens up a portal to hell, it's gonna be this.
We have it in Germany, I can say that much.
Online friendships can be more durable than in-person ones. They aren't affected by physical changes and moves.
It's this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xanomeline/trospium_chloride
Note within the domain of this problem was the point. Which means on the same machine, with the same architecture and both ends being C which is what the init system is written in.

You are adding more problems that don't exist to the specification.

As for strings, just shove a char[4096] in there. Use a bit of memory to save a lot of parsing.
Crawl4AI: Open-Source Web Crawler for Seamless AI Data Scraping
Any quasi-public forum it's probably best to leave controversial and nuanced opinions on things unsaid especially under your real name. (But even under a supposedly anonymous handle, it's probably worth asking if you really need to post this.)
Very cool.

As Moore's Law runs out of steam it is time for the low end applications of computers to shine.

Lots of comments here saying how [relatively] inefficient this is, that utterly miss the point.

Putting cheap, good enough, CPUs into all sorts of places the "efficient " processors cannot go is going to revolutionise all sorts of applications

This is not unique, but representative of its class
That isn't even unreasonable as a cultural norm, although it is that those who most firmly enforce it also cherish silly habits like saying "bring your whole self to work."

The expectation of not oversharing needs to be met by a commitment of not over-asking, but I suppose that's really too much to expect in an age so degraded that all the obligations across lines of social class are understood to run in only one direction.
How I'd like to replace certificate pinning:

* The client requests additional certificate chains

* The server returns multiple certificate chains (typically two), one chaining to a public CA, once chaining to a private CA

* The connection only succeeds if all expected chains are present and valid

* The public-key of the leaf certificates must be identical

This means:

* The public chain can follow standard practices around certificate transparency, renewal, revocation, expiration, etc.

* Clients which don't care about pinning but expect a standard public chain will work

* The chain to the private CA protects against a compromised public CA for clients which request/validate it

* Requiring identical public-keys means that this only impacts chain validation, not the key-exchange
Which statistics? You’ve literally cited none.

Statistically speaking, let’s look at the data:
- salary wise, men are still paid more in every profession (even those that are considered “traditionally female”).
- Men hold 92% of CEO positions
- Men hold 70% of executive positions.
- Men make up 70% of Congress. - 80+% or so of engineers are male.
- Men make median 67k a year and woman make 53k.

So, when you look at actual, real data, men are doing fine (and good! It’s good for everyone when good men do well).

The only truly alarming issue, from a data standpoint, is the number of men who somehow believe things are worse for them, and the resentful feelings that belief (however unsupported by the facts) brings.

I wonder where that comes from and who is benefiting from making people feel that way? Could it because of hackneyed journalism like this article? Online influencers? Politicians who want to earn votes through fear-mongering and divisiveness?

These feelings and ideas aren’t good for society. You’re doing well and you should feel good about it. If you’re not, it’s not because of your gender and it doesn’t help anyone to lay the problem there. It’s not productive.
I haven't thought about it until reading this article. The collecting of random "tiberium", "ore", etc laying around, actually makes sense in the context of Dune. Not so much in Red Alert etc.
Think of the cheap Baofeng as the little hit that keeps you coming back for more.

At least, that's what it was for me. Then I got a used Yaesu FT-817 and used that as motivation to get my general.

I now have GMRS as well, which is one of those hidden gems I wish more people in the public at large knew about.
About 50% of the time learning a new language I find that the consensus framework/library choice is not quite to my taste. It isn’t that it’s bad, it just often feels like one thing went viral and then ends up boxed in by their success such that people double down/put up with it rather than evolve it further.

Point being you’re probably going to spend those first five days evaluating the options. The “community” doesn’t know your taste or your needs. You have no idea what their goals are, or what the average skill level is. All of those things can make a big difference in selecting tech to build atop of.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive.today
Back in the 80s kids were left for hours in front of a TV watching cartoons. I suspect this was the case even earlier that that too.
I don't have full knowledge of the problem. Hence the questions. It's a pitty i only get answers in the sense of "you don't know what you are talking/questioning about".
There’s no content here. Just a link to a site that requires an account.
To be fair this viewpoint should be included as well talking about being raised by the internet. People can have so very different experiences with the computers.
I've found that my curiosity drops commensurate with my savings (and therefore the chance I'm going to get kicked out of my home, my belongings repossessed, and find food unaffordable). If people are so insecure that this opportunity to retrain an entire workforce was squandered - the money was there, the desire was there, the expertise was there - it comes off to me as more of a, "If you owe the bank $1 billion...", sort of problem, for society.
Thank goodness they didn’t pick YAML though.
(Varlink also isn't something new)
The only real roadblock for this is time. We'd welcome any contributor, especially with such an impactful contribution as this. Making iceoryx2 an option for Python would be amazing. If you or someone you know wants to take it on, we would support as much as possible.

So far for this topic, we have only done some brief research on the options available to us, such us going over the C API or using something like PyO3.
https://archive.is/BYzWs
Doesn't seem like a particularly helpful or practical way of categorizing fuel sources. Would you then place wind as a subset of solar, and solar as a subset of nuclear?
We are going to see a lot of children (and adults) raised by chatbots. Asking them for advice, confiding in them where real people don't seem safe, etc. Through the looking glass! Still, definitely better than asking Reddit for relationship advice
Ah, interesting. Maybe my experience has been unusual then.

I agree with you the retrying transactions is relatively simple and powerful.
What bleeding? Those three guys in the article do not constitute “bleeding.”
AGI is far from inevitable
Pics or it is in a super-position of happened/didn't happen
Some kids were, some kids weren't. I don't know how I ended up hacking with Linux and programming, while many others spent their time watching series and playing Nintendo. Not to say it is somehow a bad thing.
My argument doesn’t speak about the affordability. It speaks about an exchange of money for value. Not if one can spend the money, but if that money would be well-spent. :)

Piracy is often significant effort and risk. Not high but significant. First, one must learn the means to pirate content. Second, they must keep strong privacy and security habits while doing so. Third, pirated content may have malware, even pdfs. Finally, the quality is often a bit lower. There are very real downsides to privacy — effort and others. Then there are also benefits that I spoke of.

Steam has largely validated what I’m saying. So no need for extra arguing. Look into how it cleaned up video game piracy. Many people used to, especially in less economically developed regions such as Eastern Europe, pirate as main means of video game consumption. Now, it’s mostly Valve’s Steam.
I suspect when you specify “100% availability to the public” then even the most React-ionary devs will soon realize they will have to go down this alley since they have to handle browsers with javascript turned off.
I can only agree!
Well if you can turn chatgpt into an intelligent actor in a simulated economy, and are able to run it at scale, I bet you can get some valuable insights.
Simply incredible that projects like this exist
If it had been a test flight using test pilots: yes, it wouldn't have been.

There's a reason astronauts for higher risk missions tend to be selected from operational and test naval aviation backgrounds, like both of the Starliner CFT astronauts were.
Or you could question the reasoning of your Ministry of Interior. Those archiving sites are vital for the internet to have some kind of "memory".

See also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive.today
While I'm sure it can't be measured as a convenience from the family in any way you slice it I'm not sure one can compare the way they plan their and timing expectations around an orbital test flight to that of a standard work trip.
Can we please just take X.509 out and shoot it?
Tpb is still up after what 25 years?
Like removing the cap on contributions?
Not remotely the same idea, but the Magic Puzzle Company [1] makes fantastic puzzles with "two solutions." They're traditional puzzles with hand-drawn art, but the first solution is in four distinct pieces that can be reassembled to make a slightly larger rectangle with a hole in the middle. (Similar to Sam Loyd's Missing Square puzzle. [2])

Then, a second set of pieces (in a separate envelope) allow you to fill in the hole with an image that (typically) wildly alters the interpretation of the original image.

[1] https://magicpuzzlecompany.com/
[2] https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Sam_Loyd%27s_Missing_Square
> Safer != safe.

Absolute safety is not achievable. Crossing the road is not safe. Going down the stairs is not safe.

> nuclear reactors
Reactor plutonium != bomb grade plutonium. The Uranium supply used to be enriched by Russia.
I just wish my QTH was quieter. I have so much interference here it's not worth doing anything other than FT8 / JS8Call here.

On the other hand, the Icom7300 is totally fine used semi-portably out at a campsite. It runs on battery, and putting up a wire antenna is easy enough with a fiberglass pole. I even have a raspberry pi that hosts digital stuff (and an ipad running vnc to control it)
Try scrolling further down the page, you should find the content lower down.
This report gives us a framework for legislation. In no way does it "tell us what we already know".
Great article. The "contagion" factor is a useful concept that I hadn't seen before. Needs a [2018] tag.
They would also regret if something went wrong while returning on a Starliner that everyone knew wasn't working as it should. Returning on a Dragon was the safest choice available.
I really can't imagine these kind of initiatives not to exist on the other side of the ocean. From all i read here, i must assume so though.
I could think of a bunch of simpler ways to state this equation without the baloney false math (similar to the paraphrasing you did).

No, the purpose of putting this into an "equation" is to imply false rigor, and simultaneously to imply that you should hire our people to implement our "healthcare quality framework". I mean, would people really think this is any sort of non-obvious advice if you simply stated, "To improve quality, you should improve appropriateness of treatments, improve outcomes and improve service, and reduce waste." I mean, no shit Sherlock. But once you put it into an "equation", you're deliberately, and falsely, implying "Oooh, science!"
Sell it for scrap and use the money to travel.

130 tons is a hefty millstone indeed.
the mind blowing fact is that for any significant percentage of people taking something that is not yours, can be justified by anything. That is not western culture, saying that as someone born in ussr, where stealing from government has never been considered stealing, which to this day the reason for all the corruption and low level of trust on every level of communication.
I've been happy with Open Source Rust Desk https://rustdesk.com/ . You'll have to test it out to see if it meets your requirements.