skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I ride a bicycle everywhere for that reason. Walking works just as well, depending on the distance.

I just remember how beneficial the 20 minute ride/walk to and from the office was for me.

I found that you get linear returns with longer rides. I rode my bicycle for weeks and my motorcycle for months. All day every day across countries. I returned from those trips with an unmatched sense of clarity. I got to process every thought uninterrupted, if necessary for days on end.

I am not sure if meditation is my thing, but that’s as close as it gets.
Tl;Dr - the author doesn't know.
No, it would not be enforceable. Your license can only give additional rights to users. It cannot restrict rights that users already have (e.g. fair use rights in the US, or AI training rights like in the EU or SG).
Does it held its content during a BCI test ?
The US merchant fleet has already gone poof. According to Wikipedia "As of 31 December 2016, the United States merchant fleet had 175 privately owned, oceangoing, self-propelled vessels of 1,000 gross register tons and above that carry cargo from port to port. " The list is likely even shorter today.
It's definitely performance, you're right.

Though it landed its effect.
If you get 10x MoM growth you can lobby for it to be legal next year
said that i still see teams keeping Postgres running on VMs because its easy to maintain, to troubleshoot, to fine tune and to restore after a catastrophe..
Because people provide that work without acknowledging it was created by a RNG, representing it as their own and implying some of level of assurance that it is actually true.
Copying is not theft either way.
In the US that’s called the lottery. Go into any gas station in a poor neighborhood and there’s a line of people buying tickets.
checkout WinoMail, more or less a open source clone of Windows Mail:

https://github.com/bkaankose/Wino-Mail
But we do. The same AI that generates can read and reduce/summarize/evaluate.
> Higher fees from club members?

Yep. Solved. Next question please.

There exists a deeper question here regarding “why do these clubs require so much money that they need to bleed it out of the community in the form of poker machines?” I’d posit a good number of them probably don’t need that much cash, and most of it is just profit.
… unless you’re running Linux (or macOS, perhaps?) on a desktop or laptop and print something.

I’m pretty sure that even in 2024 printing is pretty common, isn’t it?

… isn’t it?
My hack is running. I feel I've cracked more major blockers in my gym shorts than at my desk. There's something to be said for stepping away and letting the solution find you.

Another effective hack is to verbally talk about the problem to someone else. That seems to change how the brain processes things and that new perspectives can find the answers internalizing could not.
No, because we have seen massive improvements in AI over the last years, and all the evidence points to this progress continuing at a fast pace.
> Also for the love of God, don't expose your printing service to the public internet.

300k and counting.

Weirdly enough, my printer is running cups-browsed, and available via my Public IP. I'm assuming some hack to transition one kind of machine to another - though that means it is running a full kernel, which is kinda astonishing.

But the POC works to control it, so...
NIST Interoperable Randomness Beacons
Gitlab is something as well that i keep seeing, if on premise and not AWS, regardless of having a k8s, they prefer to have it on a VM.
This is mixing up two meanings of "art". Mona Lisa doesn't need to be 10000x cheaper.

Random illustration on a random blog post sure could.

Art as an evocative expression of the artist shouldn't be cheapened. But those freelancers churning content on Fiverr aren't pouring their soul into it.
Echoing from comments, most likely the image is scaled down and / or only fingerprints (think: Shazaam) are uploaded.

While the latter allows remote party to gauge what you're looking at it most likely doesn't infringe copyrights. But, as you mention, it might very well violate some of the HDCP fine print.
when you get to be as old as i am, these are the war stories you share with your kids and grandkids around the campfire ;-)

like the one from my colleague who once fat fingered fsck into mkfs and i lost my personal homepage because of it. what makes me uncomfortable about that story is that it was not my fault. if it were it would have been easier to tell. but at the time i was quite frustrated and my colleague felt that despite me trying to not get angry at him. i still feel really bad about my reaction then, adding to his predicament, since he had to live with the guilt about losing our website and everyone's personal home directory. it's bad when a mistake causes you to loose something personal, but so much worse when you loose someone elses stuff.

talking about mistakes is how we learn from them. the important part is not to get embarrassed about them. however that requires an environment where we are not blaming each other when something goes wrong.

i could have made that mistake myself. and i applied this lesson to my own learning as if i had.

blessed be the pessimist, for he hath made backups...
Exactly. The web before LLMs was mostly low effort SEO spam written by low-wage people in marketing agencies.

Now it's mostly zero effort LLM-generated SEO spam, and the low-wage workers lost their jobs.
The difference is that before, intellectual property law was used by corporations to enrich themselves. Now intellectual property law could theoretically be used to combat an even bigger enemy: big tech stealing all possible jobs. It's just a matter of practicality, like all law is.
That was the big shift here for the Kia mess. Normally the thieves tend to be professionals so the stolen ones are at a port or being stripped soon afterwards, but when that hit TikTok there were a lot more joyrides and brief use for theft/robbery because it was a bunch of teenagers who didn’t have much of a plan.
NPS is utter bullshit, and has been thoroughly debunked, yet it's so widespread...
I absolutely hate that gambling adverts on TV are legal in the UK. I've seen at least one friend's life ruined because of it.

9pm, and it's wall-to-wall.

Ironically, this is around the same time as bans on smoking in pubs, and tobacco advertising became draconian.

But gambling doesn't do any first-order physical harm, so it's all good, right?

Seeing betting firms on the front of football teams' shirts offends me.

> When Tony Blair's Labour government introduced the Gambling Act in 2005, it allowed gambling firms to advertise sports betting, poker and online casinos on TV and radio for the first time.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-64510095
The only time I print something is at work and even that is rare.
I think you need to recalibrate, it does not read like a Reddit shitpost at all.
I was a big proponent of legalizing sports gambling before it happened here in the US. After that, one of my best friends lost 5 figures on sports gambling that he really couldn’t afford to lose. I’ve also watched sports talk shows degrade to simple betting tips, and TV is now borderline unwatchable due to the pharmaceutical and gambling ads. To me, a few regulations/restrictions seem useful. I think broad legalization went too far.

One regulation would be banning gambling advertising, for the same reason why smoking ads are (I think?) banned. It is especially nefarious how companies lure in new customers with free bets, often with unscrupulous cash-out conditions, in order to get people hooked. It’s the equivalent of ads providing someone a coupon code to get several boxes of free cigarettes, at which point they get hooked.

Another change I’d like to see is the end of mobile gambling. I’ve never done it, but from watching friends do it, it was far too easy to deposit money, or borrow money on credit, and bet it frivolously. At least if such behavior is confined to a casino, there is some larger barrier to entry for people.

I do not know if this is true in other states, but certain states have the ability for an individual to self-institute a gambling ban at all facilities in the state. I’m not sure if this applies to gambling online. If not, then it should. And if other states don’t have it, then they would greatly benefit from it.

It also seems somewhat fair to me to tax the casinos and other companies profiting from gambling and using that money to fund services for people who become addicted. If you’re going to help create a problem, you should have to help clean it up.
There was some talk lower in the thread about devices being able to form mesh-networks with other devices that do have internet connection (for ex. your neighbour) and share data that way, there hasn't been any links or sources to the claims yet however
If I understand your comment correctly, you are saying laws are bad, and decriminalization/deregulation is good

I would very much like to believe that. But see what happened in Oregon after decriminalizing drugs.
A report of a Samsung TV automatically connecting to a nearby unsecured network: https://web.archive.org/web/20210912135232/https://forum.dev...

Not as common as I thought though: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25275350
Is SSN, phone, and home address repeated for ~200 pages? Seems like there's more to it than just that data.
Wow it's the first time that I don't know part of what i'm talking about and i'm still right...

MySpace is mostly erased (prominent Italian musicians for some music waves of the 00s and 10s were there), some sites are erased, what pertains to radio and television is mostly not indexed on the public internet and there's significant digital divide between genres. In the Italian context, you'd end with a weird pantheon of rock, rap and popstars and not much else left, in conclusion you would... expunge significant artists and whole genres from results.
Gonna keep me 2012 toyota a biiiit longer then. Sorry climate.
No, that is wrong. We can't "choose" because too many people have instincts. And people always have the instinct to use new technology to gain incremental advantages over others, and that in turn puts pressure on everyone to use it. That prisoner's dilemma situation means that without a firm and larger guiding moral philosophy, we really can't choose because instinct takes over choice. In other words, the way technology is used in modern society is not a matter of choice but is largely autonomous and goes beyond human choice. (Of course, a few individuals will choose but the average effect is likely to be negative.)
Legalising it? No.

Normalising it? Yes.

Unfortunately, our culture seems to have two settings: legal ban; full celebratory embrace. We don’t seem to be able to handle tolerating and discouraging (see smoking, which is slowly being banned across the once-civilised world).

Should the awesome power of the State be deployed to wield violence against people who bet money on sports? No, that’s insane. Should there be half a dozen betting ads every hour on primetime TV? No, that’s crazy too.
What frustrates me is the bandwagoning, and thus the awful homogeny in all social media copy these days, since it seems everyone is using an LLM to generate their copy writing, and thus 99.999% of products will "elevate" something or the other, and there are annoying emojis scattered throughout the text.
If it had some review process - that would be some kind of killerfeature
You and I seem to live in very different worlds. The one I live and work in is full of over confident devs that have no actual IT education and mostly just copy and modify what they find on the internet. The average level of IT people I see daily is down right shocking and I'm quite confident that OP's workflow might be better for these people in the long run.
It's great that you can see both extremes and have such a clear-eyed, honest view about the situation. There's only so much you can do.

The way I deal with it is I post comments online. It's the best I can do and the least I can do. Also, I believe that pointing out system flaws will lead to better outcomes and a better life for every honest person, rich or poor.
The personal information is blacked out... and Elmo still seem to block people for 12 hours when you share the link.
You are thinking too big, most of the time the truth is whether a piece of food is spoiled or not etc, and that greatly affects your quality of life. Companies would love to keep you ignorant here so they can sell you literal shit, so there are powerful forces wanting to keep you ignorant, and today those powerful forces has way stronger tools than ever before working to keep you ignorant.
Simple Ideas Leading to Extreme Sentiments
Bing has it. The "Cached" link is in a little dropdown arrow menu behind the result's title.

Agreed that the Wayback Machine is not a replacement. There is a long delay before things show up there, if they do at all. If a page was going through technical difficulties and was unreachable, Google Cache was usually the only way to still access it.

I also don't understand where Google Guy gets this from:

"[…] it was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn't depend on a page loading. These days, things have greatly improved."

It can't only be me who feels that website reliability has dramatically crashed over the past decade or so, and it keeps getting worse.
It does mean doing your own research and asking yourself what you value in clothing. The sneakers I had in mind while writing this were Thursday Boots' Premier. I haven't worn them - I don't really like white shoes - but I know about them from a(n independent) Youtube channel called Rose Anvil, who review shoes and boots from a construction and material POV. This type of simple white sneaker is available from a lot of suppliers. Thursday are at the cheaper end and most HN users will be able to find a domestic or customs-free manufacturer if they value that.

There are other Youtubers who take a similar approach to basics like jeans and t-shirts, or outerwear. Reddit is particularly good for jeans and leather footwear. Social media and fashion doesn't have to mean peer pressure and trend chasing: the values I'm advocating for aren't rare. An understandable distate for the fashion industry doesn't mean we should disengage and settle for clothes that feel bad and opt for false economy.
It's concept is not wiki but book. You aren't as lost as in a Wiki. Works great as a digital manual
I wonder how successful Russian companies are at enforcing their IP in the US? I’ll venture a guess that the US is not helpful either.
In the context OP evokes when he says "Maroccolo" (90s and 00s) I would have said Bubola in place of Maroccolo!
Writing by hand is the best, but if you don't want to do that, speak out loud. If you don't want to do that, read it and memorize it many (10+) times. Just like how I can still remember all the prices for common items from when I was a cashier even 15 years later, stuff you touch often sticks in your head, so constantly expose yourself to the information you need to know at all times.
daniel_k 53 minutes ago | next [-]

I agree with the sentiment, especially when it comes to creativity. AI tools are great for boosting productivity in certain areas, but we’ve started relying too much on them for everything. Just because we can automate something doesn’t mean we should. It’s frustrating to see how much mediocrity gets churned out in the name of ‘efficiency.’

testers_unite 23 minutes ago | next [-]

As a fellow QA person, I feel your pain. I’ve seen these so-called AI test tools that promise the moon but deliver spaghetti code. At the end of the day, AI can’t replicate intuition or deep knowledge. It’s just another tool in the toolbox—useful in some contexts but certainly not a replacement for expertise.

nlp_dev 2 hours ago | next [-]

As someone who works in NLP, I think the biggest misconception is that AI is this magical tool that will solve all problems. The reality is, it’s just math. Fancy math, sure, but without proper data, it’s useless. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve had to explain this to business stakeholders.

-HN comments for TFA, courtesy of ChatGPT
"I'm tired of the atomic bomb" - Someone in 1945.

Oh wait, news flash, not all technological developments are good ones, and we should actually evaluate each one individually.

AI is shit, and some people having fun with it does not balance against it's unusually efficacy in turning everything into shit. Choosing to do something because it's fun without regard to the greater consequences is the sort of irresponsibility that has gotten human society into such a mess in the first place.
MS: just buy a faster CPU, not my problem
> I recently replaced my spam filter with a custom fineruned multimodal LLM that reads my emails a pure images.

That doesn’t sound very energy efficient.
Part of the problem and the only cause are not the same thing.

Both Kia and the thieves can be in the wrong. Trying to break it down to one cause is never going to work.

Some car will always be the easiest to steal. People should always take reasonable precautions. But crime is still crime; if someone leaves their car running with the door unlocked as they run into the store and it gets stolen - they made a mistake but the criminal did a crime.
Sure, but the author is interested in archiving the Teletext pages hidden in the recordings of the TV shows, not the TV shows themselves.
Needles in haystacks.
This is a great post, and full of inspiring ideas for what kind of work flows and features a modern theorem proving system could support.
Sure, it's practical, that's why most people don't have a separate smart box. That's why I called it a curse, because most people are being nagged with ads and being tracked on a level the article talks about.

Smart boxes can communicate with the TV (HDMI-CEC), and you don't have to ever use the TV's remote. If the box turns on, it turns on the TV and switches the source. Same with turn off. If you cast a youtube video to the box, the TV also turns on, etc. So it works completely seamless (at least in my case).

Oh wait, I just remembered regular TV channels exist, I guess you will still need the TV's remote for that.
Well, it has more Copilot AI stuff baked in, that's what people want nowadays.
i’m at the point where i don’t trust any markdown formatted text. it’s actually become an anti signal which is very sad because i used to consider it a signal of partial technical literacy.
Apple TV is really your best option if you want privacy. Google is primarily an ad company that wants to learn as much about you as possible to target those ads.
Respectfully,

I understand the criticism: LLMs, on their own, are not going to be able to do anything more. Release in this sense only means this: to fully embrace the means necessary to allow technology to overcome the current conditions of possibility that it is bound under, and LLMs, "AI" or whatever you call it, merely gives us the afterimage of this potentiality. But they are not, in themselves, that potential: the future is required. But its a future that must be created, otherwise we won't have one.

That's, at least, what the other commenters were saying. You ignore the content for the form! Or, as they say, you missed the forest for the trees. I can't stop you from being angry because I used the word "pussy," or even because I addressed the users of HN as directly complicit. I can, however, point out the mediocrity inherent to such a discourse. It is precisely the same mediocrity, the drive towards "politeness," that makes ChatGPT so insufferable, and makes the rest of us so angry. But, go ahead, whine some more. I don't care, you can do what you want.

I disagree with one point, however: it is not a race to the bottom. We're trying to go below it.
I don't often ask why something is on the front page, but why is this answerless clickbait about something that can be trivially looked up on Wikipedia on the frontpage?
Take a look at the user's comment history. I'd argue the majority of them are generated, it really doesn't take much to recognize the patterns and tics those models commonly display (for now*), and it doesn't seem there was any attempt to make it appear otherwise, too. It may look coherent at first, but there's no deeper meaning or significance, it's noise.
So now Outlook users' emails have two points to leak from? And we all know how good MS' security is.

> ... Co-pilot ...

Make that three. And beware:

> The offloading ... removes the ability for security engineers or researchers to easily inspect what the client is doing
For me it's home automation. I turn down the lights or switch to a movie scene whenever the TV turns on. Oh, and my external subwoofer also gets its power turned on/off the same way.
I think the key thing here is equating trust and truth. I trust my dog, a lot, more than most humans frankly. She has some of my highest levels of trust attainable, yet I don’t exactly equate her actions with truth. She often barks when there’s no one at the door or at false threats she doesn’t know aren’t real threats and so on. But I trust she believes it 100% and thinks she’s helping me 100%.

What I think OP was saying and I agree with is that connection, that knowing no matter what was said or how flawed or what motive someone had I trusted there was a human producing the words. I could guess and reasons the other factors away. Now I don’t always know if that is the case.

If you’ve ever played a multiplayer game, most of the enjoyable experience for me is playing other humans. We’ve had good game AIs in many domains for years, sometimes difficult to distinguish from humans, but I always lost interest if I didn’t know I was in fact playing and connecting with another human. If it’s just some automated system I could do that any hour of the day as much as I want but it lacked the human connection element, the flaws, the emotion, the connection. If you can reproduce that then maybe it would be enjoyable but that sort of substance has meaning to many.

It’s interesting to see a calculator quickly spit out correct complex arithmetic but when you see a human do it, it’s more impressive or at least interesting, because you know the natural capability is lower and that they’re flawed just like you are.
Respect. That kind of simplicity is not easy to achieve for a lot of people, I think, depending on where they live. I aspire to a walk-first lifestyle, bicycle for longer distance, public transport (bus and train) for further.

But so much of urban design and rural infrastructure is car-centric. Sometimes it feels like malicious design, a dark pattern to force people to become dependent on owning automobiles as a necessity for daily living.

Imagine if you went for a 10-minute drive instead of a walk.. It would be an entirely different and worse experience.
Nazism and pedophilia are controversial???
The difference is that now we'll have even more zero-effort SEO spam because AI is a force multiplier for that. Much more.
> You can absolutely write a license that contains the clauses I mentioned and it would be enforceable.

A license (copyright law) is not a contract (contract law). Simply publishing something does not make the whole world enter into a contract with you. Others first have to explicitly agree to do so.

> Sorry, but the onus is on OpenAI to read the licenses not the creator.

They can ignore it because they never agreed to it in the first place.

> And throwing your hands in the air and saying "oh you can't do that in a license" is also of little use.

It is very useful to know what works and what does not. That way you don't trick yourself and your work to be safe, don't get caught by surprise if you are in fact not and can think of alternatives instead.

BTW, a thing you can do (which
CaptainFever mentioned) and lots of services do because licenses are so weak is to make people sign up with an account and have them enter a ToS agreement instead.
I suppose Open Philanthropy does as well, then.