skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
At that point wouldn't you "just" download the source and compile locally? Since you presumably could compile stuff. Add a 'bin' folder in your home directory to your PATH and enjoy.
The original claim was for the “entire world” which is why I specifically used global stats.
Linux will run on a 68020 which is a couple of years older than a 386.
nobody is a saint on this matter. both parties act the way they do to support their business position.

short-term support helps qualcomm sell more because their customers want to sell more phones to the same users. on the other hand, for the industrial partners there is an "LTS" model of support given (side effect being fairphone 5 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37320800).

long-term support through backwards compatibility helps intel because they can sell new chips with the assurance that the ancient, unmaintained industrial software continues to run in a shinier box.
> Since then, the nation’s peak demand has fallen by roughly 16% due to improvements in energy efficiency.

Energy demand in UK declining because prices went up which accelerated deindustrialisation and forced people's to use less energy e. g. heat homes less .
Apple’s latest iPhone 16 is being produced and launched globally from the Indian factories. Driven by the production-linked incentive (PLI) scheme, the tech giant reached around $5 billion in iPhone exports from India in the April-August period this fiscal (FY25). As per industry data, this is a growth of over 50 per cent from the same period of the first five months in FY24. (IANS)
The Rubber-Keyed Wonder – a new film charts the development of the ZX Spectrum
you might note that people still paint.
Ask HN: What do you use for your personal blog?
I want to create a simple, SEO friendly personal blog.

Do you have any open source and self-hosted recommendation?
Thank you for your contributions. I believe the world would be a better place if you were paid for them.
Joel Spolsky called it "hit and run management": https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2000/03/23/command-and-conque...
Hi there. Where did you purchase those from?
None of them are simple, they are chock full of hacks upon hacks, “fixing” their own idiocies, and by extension, none of them are doing their one thing well. Especially bash scripts, they should be left behind..
Because of its purpose, Intel 4004 did not have many features that had been recognized as necessary already since the first automatic computers, for example the lack of logic operations, which was mentioned in the parent article.

Therefore I do not believe that it is possible to consider Intel 4004 as a general-purpose processor. It had only the features strictly necessary for the implementation of the Busicom calculator.

The idea to sell 4004 for other uses has appeared long after the design was finished, when Busicom did not want to pay for the chipset as much as Intel desired, so Intel decided to try to sell the chipset to other customers too, and then they thought to advertise it as a "CPU".

Moreover, it is debatable whether Intel 4004 can be considered as a monolithic processor, because 4004 was not really usable without the rest of the chipset, which provided some of the functions that are normally considered to belong into a processor.

The Intel 4004 4-bit "CPU" implemented less functions than the 4-bit TTL ALU 74181, which was general-purpose and which was the main alternative at that time for implementing a CPU, but it had the advantage of including many registers, because the MOS registers were much cheaper in die area than the TTL registers, and these included registers were the reason why a CPU implemented with the Intel 4004 chipset had a lower integrated circuit count than the equivalent implementation with MSI TTL ICs.

Intel's advertisement of 4004 being a CPU was just an advertisement of the same kind of Tesla having a "Full Self-Driving".
as outlandish as it sounds, there might be a better chance of this happening than the arm deal. the only reason being that both companies are registered in the same country, where the other parties would have a harder time blocking things.
This user account is spamming the same message into various threads. Correct or not, it leaves a taste.
Well i'm using importmaps on some projects but mostly i stick with Asset Pipeline and that is for new projects also. Over the years i iterated towards a setup which is very efficient and simple to use which is to have light JS dependencies and no JS frameworks. And when the need for complex client side arises i use Elm which is a joy to use once you get through the learning.

Also the Asset Pipeline stack is getting even lighter nowadays since with CSS nesting and other new features you can drop SASS completely
Conspiracy theory: creating new bugs they can always fix later is a good source of continued employment.

That is absolutely a thing [1]. There are hardware devices that can be fixed illegally fixed using 3rd party software for this reason. The people making a work around to the scam then get sued. The video is worth a watch in my opinion. It was created 3 years ago and the problem is still ongoing.

[1] - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrDEtSlqJC4 [video][29min]
Not to pile on, but the linked article you presented backs their data on
New AutoMotive’s Global Electric Vehicle Tracker, a UK based group fostering EV adoption.

NAGEVT site only shows data for UK, is unclear which data sources they used, and whether they added PHEV (still ICEs) into the mix.

Don’t mean to come obnoxious, I just spent a few weeks researching the topic for 10 countries and my data differs a lot from theirs.
I work on a project with 4.4 million lines of code and using a single Makefile with no generated code works fine. It's really not all that difficult.
There are projects that generate files, depend on multiple languages, etc. If you push the job of a build tool to the compiler infrastructure, then why even have a “build tool” in the first place? Make is simply anemic for anything remotely complex, and there are countless better tools that actually solve the problem.
Out of curiosity, I checked whether Google Pixel has something similar, and found the list:

https://xdaforums.com/t/official-google-repair-guides-for-va...
How would you define "the greater good" for a publisher of small-medium scaled games?
I’m middle-aged. I’ve noticed in the last few months more and more articles with this style. Something I’ve never seen before in blogging or article writing.

I usually notice the style at some point but this time I had no idea until this other commenter pointed it out. I guess I am getting acclimatized.
I don't think that link is necessarily better just because it's the original source. The linked article gives a concise overview, while the blog post spends the first paragraph talking about moving and starting a new job.
The thought process is as follows: The customer seems satisfied with the overall cost.But if travel expenses could be lowered, we have the opportunity to reduce the bill slightly while increasing our profit margin.

Thus, it can be construed as a win-win.
you must be european
It also has one of most spectacular multi week hikes in the world, if not #1, the Annapurna circuit. I was lucky to take it in 2008 with almost nobody on the trail (just right after monsoons in second half of September), took 16 days, around 220km IIRC. No roads built back then although we saw few CAT bulldozers dropped in the impossible places in gorges, I guess part of construction.

From absolute tropical jungle, through all other climates to frozen high altitude icy desert and all the way back, top point is 5,400m high. Also at one point hinduism of lowlands switches to buddhism. Wild marihuana growing everywhere. Muktinath just after(before) the highest pass is an important sacred and pilgrimage place for 3 different religions.

There is one point in Kali Gandaki gorge where you look left and there is absolute tibetan-style desert with 0 plants, just rocks and dirt, going up to Manang region. You look right and its typical tropical jungle. And in between, in span of maybe 7-8km the whole gradient happens continuously on Annapurna western slopes. Another nice spot is IIRC Marpha where you are looking at almost 5000m pretty much vertical drop on cca top of Dhaulaghiri, its sister 8000m+ peak. Even after 2 weeks of constant exposition to himalayan giants I just stood there in awe.

A life changing experience for me due to various factors and also people met. It has a special place in my heart.
You're arguing with the conclusions of the official investigation, not me.
That's definitely the million dollar question (literally). I don't imagine they got all 25 or so staff to resign at once if they didn't have a plan for funding. But there weren't any details about that aspect from what I read (could have missed it).

I imagine well get more developments over the coming weeks on that.
You have to handle dependencies either way to build a project - what’s one more tiny executable?

This criticism might make sense for some non-vim editor because you might have to ssh into a remote location where you can’t install stuff. But if you should be able to build a project and thus install its required dependencies, then you might as well add one additional word to the install command.
Security-related product defect, or simply security defect.
I agree, as a man that has been identified as “not able to understand it”, with “it” being a lot of unacceptable behaviours toward women (and the same is true with racism btw), you become blissfully unaware of it because the behaviour never is exhibited when you’re around, strangely.

But sometimes there are slippages and that’s when the jaw dropping moments start to roll. I seriously revised the view I had of my people skills when it comes to believing to know people and what they are capable of or not. I have been proven seriously wrong, I clearly wasn’t as good at judging people as I thought. It was for me double jaw dropping in a sense: the behaviour itself and the person exhibiting the behaviour, which I would have sworn up and down was unable of something like this.
Happy Birthday to NeXTSTEP!
I’m working on and using Lamb. You can find it via the github link in my profile.

The usp is friction free super simple blogging, self-hosted.

If you don’t mind using something under construction, I’d love to head any feedback.
So how do you build any project, which have countless dependencies that all have to be installed?
Well, Phoenix is basically fixed Rails. Most (or all) good bits kept as it is while getting rid of many, many cons
Open-Source CLI tool to inspect databases fast
While working on other projects, I found myself always having to connect and use SELECT * to see dummy entries or new users. I favored the CLI for monitoring my database entries, especially because I was testing and just adding dummy users + our first normal users in projects. So it became a bit tiring always having to connect to postgres, mysql and give select * queries from the CLI.
Or they didn't since this software is supposed to function and has been functioning for all the previous many years/OS versions?
> Lots of my bike tools I have will take over a decade to get my money back

That's... a bit surprising. Maybe one or two I could see, like a truing stand or some one-off equally proprietary thing for one brand of part, but what else?

Edit: nvm, there seems to be plenty of Park Tools brand niche reamers and so on that are many hundreds of dollars. I would think they'd remain viable for much longer than a battery replacement press though, since you'd adapt it to a particular bike's repair needs with different bits.
You can also choose to avoid complexity.

Often a shorter computer program that is easy to understand can do exactly what a more complicated program can. We can simplify interfaces between systems and ensure that their specifications are short, readable and implementable without allocation, buffers or other things that can be implemented incorrectly. We can ensure that program code is stored separately from data.

Now that LLMs are getting better we could probably have them go through all our code and introduce invariants, etc. to make sure it does exactly what it's supposed to, and if it can't then a human expert can intervene for the function for which the LLM can't find the proof.

I think hardware manufacturers could help too. More isolation, Harvard architectures etc. would be quite appealing.
No, in Norwegian we make words by joining multiple word together (closed compound) in this case sky(cloud) and vern(protection).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compound_(linguistics)
I think we just found a use for all those Juicero's destined for the landfill.
The Mathematics of Dobble (2018)
The US is not really a resource based economy (though it less dependent on external resources than many others). Gulf countries are.
> neither you nor your teammates have to think about these things

You're better off using a Makefile linter. But you must know about the problem before being able to solve it. And error messages like

Makefile:2: *** missing separator. Stop.

aren't the most helpful.
> If you want to generate more than one file (like an object file and a module or a precompiled header or ...)

He's not using C, though :-)

> And the problem isn't that they use it, but that they are proposing it as a solution to "everybody".

He's proposing it for the same reason I'm starting to like it, after many years in the industry: as a simple build wrapper.

> And that their Makefile stops working as soon as there is a directory (or file) `build` (or `dev` or ...) in the project root.

And they can fix that problem in 5 minutes, big deal :-)

> Don't forget that not every Make is GNU Make, BSD and other nix like Solaris/Illumos still exist.

This is a very bad reason in this day and age. 99.999999% of *NIX usage these days, probably 99.9999999999999999% for the average person, since most people won't ever get to those environments where BSD and Solaris are still used, is Linux.

And even for BSD and Solaris, guess what... you add an extra step in the build instructions asking them to... install GNU Make.

Heck, even back in 2005 (I think?) for Solaris one of the first things you'd do was to install the GNU userland wherever allowed because the Solaris one was so forlorn I swear I heard wooden planks creak and dust pouring down every time I had to use their version of ps.

And regarding POSIX, meh. If you're a C developer (C++, Rust, I guess), knock yourself out. Most of the stuff devs use are so far removed from POSIX... Actually, not removed, but has so many non-POSIX layers on top (I mean not standardized). Ruby bundler is not standardized like awk. Python pip is not standardized like make. Etc, etc. That's the reality we're in. POSIX is very useful but only as a very low level base most people don't need to chain themselves directly to. I'd definitely not avoid a tool because it's not in the latest POSIX standard (or only in the latest POSIX standard).
> allows us to maintain the benefits of open development while avoiding the pitfalls of unrestricted open-source licensing, ensuring we can sustainably develop and support

"allow us", "ensuring we can" ...

You misunderstand OSS, which is about "allow all", and "ensuring all of us can". Of course, the OSS model doesn't always work, nor do its proponents claim it is the one true way to run a project. Though, they do get irked when source-available licenses try to pass off as "almost OSS" but aren't quite.
The consumer space is brutally competitive - you're working on tight margins and designs become obsolete very quickly. MediaTek's business is built on selling chips with the latest features at the lowest possible price. Everything has to be done at a breakneck pace that is dictated by the silicon. You start writing firmware as soon as the hardware design is finalised; it needs to be ready as soon as the chips are ready to ship. These conditions are not at all suited to good software engineering.

In an ideal world, consumers would be happy to pay a premium for a device that's a generation behind in terms of features but has really good firmware. In the real world, only Apple have the kind of brand and market power to even attempt that.
> It's already installed practically everywhere

Well, except Windows. But nobody uses that right?
Does the abstract sound like ChatGPT output to anyone else? Their A and B require a delicate balance of C and D, 'compelling', 'embody a distinct intersection', 'wide array of possibilities'... You don't even need to read past the first few sentences.
What's the definition of truly secure?
> There's no proof of these cars even existing

Here's a Nio covering 891.4 km (554 miles) on a single charge with its 150 kWh battery pack:

https://insideevs.com/news/732567/nio-chinese-ev-range-test/

Here's a Nio doing a battery swap in 6 minutes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmWL1hZQmD0
> This is a real shame for anyone who cares about really distinctive, original games.

Is it though? Annapurna is a publisher, they didn't make those games. The games you listed were made by:

- Outer Wilds: Mobius Digital
- Stray: BlueTwelve Studio
- Lorelei and the laser eyes: Simogo
- Cocoon: Geometric Interactive
- Neon White: Angel Matrix

I'm confident that creators of distinctive, original games will be able to find other publishers.
Pedantry: they aren't the same horses, though: in 1915 they were mostly draft horses, with a few sport/pleasure; in 2023 they're mostly sport/pleasure, with a few draft.
> Does NAT port exhaustion not count as "materially affecting bandwidth"?

In a home network this is a negligible concern. In a CGNAT setup it is a limitation of the hardware or ISP, not really NAT. Furthermore it impedes establishing connections, not bandwidth.

> Furthermore, the keepalive packets

First, what keepalive packets? NAT does not introduce packets into an existing TCP or UDP stream; for TCP it uses control packets to detect state and whether teardown is needed. For UDP keepalive packets depends on the underlying protocol; for example wireguard supports a persistent keepalive. But is this material though? Will this even materially affect a dialup connection?

> Either way, expecting no effects on latency/bandwidth when additional processing is involved is a rather insane take.

You're putting words in my mouth. I asked does it materially affect bandwidth or latency or does it bottleneck it in some way. My argument is that NAT introduces packet process delay in the magnitude of microseconds per packet processing. This is negligible when most applications on the Internet deal with latency in milliseconds. Lastly, if the point is to compare, it'd be NAT against no NAT, not really NAT against IPv6. I find your position weak insofar saying port exhaustion or keepalive packets limit bandwidth; if it does, quantify it.

> Anecdotally, I have experienced IPv4 slowdown due to CGNAT overload. Make of it what you will.

That's on your ISP, not NAT. It's no different to your ISP delivering gigabit to last mile and using dialup links for connectivity. They need to adequately resource the network.
You'll do fine :) PyTorch has an API that is somewhat similar to numpy, although if you've never programmed a GPU you might want to get up to speed on that first.
New study links increase in global warming to increase in teenage pregnancy
> As for why Porsche is spending money on ICE engines...well, no one really buys a Porsche because it's a "practical car", do they?

I don't know. I find my daily very practical: a Porsche Panamera MY2013, now nearing 125 000 miles and 12 y/o. Still under extended manufacturer warranty. I have it since more than five years now (bought it used). Next car is another used Panamera (probably a 2020 or something). Very sweet, comfy, luxurious ride and yet if you push the pedal to the metal, way funnier to drive than, say, a Mercedes Class S.
This is plain false. Companies contribute massively to the Linux kernel.

GPL worked very well for it even if, unfortunately, it's not GPL-3
Want to just briefly mention, since the article doesn't mention it at all, the blatant conflict of interests:

> open source project maintainers are not being paid for their work, spend three times as much time on security than they did three years ago, and have become less trusting of contributors following the xz backdoor, according to open source package security firm Tidelift.

> Tildelift: Reduce security risk from bad open source packages
I like Arc, and I don’t want to pile on: God knows I’ve written vulnerable code.

To explore a constructive angle both for the industry generally and the Browser Company specifically: hire this clever hacker who pwned your shit in a well-remunerated and high-profile way.

The Browser Company is trying to break tradition with a lot of obsolete Web norms, how about paying bullshit bounties under pressure rather than posting the underground experts to guard the henhouse.

If the Browser Company started a small but aggressive internal red team on the biohazard that is the modern web?

I’ll learn some new keyboard shortcuts and I bet a lot of people will.
That's not my experience yet. I don't need to fight against a prompt eater that generates tremendous amount of nonsense that it will pretend to apologies about when you start to point every flows present in its output, having to deal with even more large amount of thoughtless suggestions as a result.

When you use a scaffolding script from Rails or similar, the result is always consistent, and errors will most likely be coming from the command used than from the fundamental way the script works.
In general, I would wager that HN prefers intellectual curiosity over overviews. Submission guidelines infer that by stating "Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter."
Another comment posted a project using waveshares 7 inch color epaper ($85).
Not this again :). Just taking a random example: the Samsung S5 was IPX67 rated (up to 1m for 30min), was thinner than an iPhone 16, and had a replaceable battery. Admittedly, it has fewer mAh, but it's also older battery technology and the volume of the phone case is slightly smaller (and probably has bigger electronics).

Is should be totally possible to make a good 2024 flagship with replaceable batteries, but we'd have to forgo the fancy glass back panels.
You can have carbon neutral synthetic fuels.
reader mode is your friend.
Phew, I was so worried. So for 48 years out of Unix' 53 years of existence (90% of that time), make hasn't been the new kid on the block. Oh, let alone the fact that we're talking about stuff from 48 years ago, when their "screen" was a paper printout of the output.
The problem is, I forget the commands all the time, because I use them on rare occasions. It gets the how this shit worked moment off your shoulder.
But that's most likely 1% of the market. They can have their own phones. The rest of us just want water resistance for accidental contact with water and easily replaceable batteries.
egotistical? You are sharing the outputs of your efforts with the whole world.
The majority of businesses are not run by billionaires, in fact most of them are more tightly affiliated than the average large tech company.

It's not nearly as simple as you're making it out, and those of us that work in large capital industries (tech), have a very different relationship than the majority of workers in America.

I'm not saying we don't share problems, or that they don't have their own issues that are worse, just that your view doesn't reflect the total of reality
Not just CPU-bound, but IO-bound workloads can also complete within milliseconds.

> have they claimed that?

The mention of "token bucket" in the project readme is why I wrote the comment I did.

... FAIR [only throttles] when there's a genuine shortage of resources as opposed to the approaches like token bucket or leaky bucket which may reject requests ...