skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you think you must ask AI for this, wait till you learn Wikipedia article you replied on says just that but with more sourced detail and less possibility for accidental falsehood
Yeah buyer's agent comp will be the norm for the interim on listings. However, people are already listing without buyer's comp or like in my instance lower than usual comp, and as time goes on I would expect to see more buyers going the attorney route and factoring that they are saving sellers a few percent into the offer.

At the end of the day, it's not your agent's job to decide which agents he will work with, it is to sell your home and leave as much money in your pocket without exposing you to unnecessary risk. You'll still have the title insurance, the inspections, and the buy/sell agreement, so what is his problem with someone coming to the table without an agent if their paperwork is in order? To me, him insisting to only "work within his network" sounds like a huge red flag.
Stop avoiding conflict on your teams
Addendum/edit: strike the word "new" on point 6.
I think the desire to do something meaningful can easily exist outside of a "competitive dynamic", which was the thing that felt off for me.
They should investigate and tell us what SAP actually does/is.
SEPA Instant has existed since 2017, and in 2025 it will become mandatory for all banks to support for free.
Life Confirmed Under Antarctic Ice (2014)
I don't think Dreams gets enough credit because it came out at the end of the PlayStation 4's life and it didn't get a lot of marketing, but it absolutely is fantastic. I'd say it's the best implementation of visual scripting I've ever seen, and that's using a traditional game controller (or two PSMove controllers) instead of a mouse/keyboard. That's not even including the modeling tools or music tools.

As someone who makes games, I often hear people ask me "how do I get started?" And my first answer is always "learn C." When they look at me funny, I say, "Try Dreams on Playstation."
These sorts of optimizations can and should be handled by a (sufficiently smart (tm)) compiler.

Common Lisp/SBCL is usually sufficiently smart. I know not everyone likes Common Lisp, but at least I would have tested it with something more performant that Guile, like Chicken Scheme (my favorite!), Chez Scheme, etc.

I like Guile and its purpose as a universal scripting language. However, its performance issues are well known. Even compared to other scripting-first languages (Lua, Perl, Python etc).
Frog Protocols: accelerate Wayland Protocols development
> This is a massive UX issue

I don't see what would really motivate businesses to change their mind on this. Since the barrier to entry for an EV charging station is many orders of magnitude lower than a gas station, it's pretty easy for a business to just add one in to an existing parking spot as an extra revenue stream or another way to draw customers. But they might reasonably value having available parking for customers over the revenue they get from EV charging.

I things will probably move more in this direction as EVs become more popular and the average customer is more likely to drive one.
GP referred specifically to queries checking if "user is a member of group A and has an IP located in country B".

The number of feature flags is irrelevant. In fact, the feature flag and A/B testing services I used always returned all default treatment overrides in a single request.
Was interested and considering switching until I saw this part:

>According to the benchmarks, Redka is several times slower than Redis.

Still a cool project, don't get me wrong. But this kind of doesn't give me any incentive to switch.
I think he was referring to a freely available full planet OSM mbtiles dump, to be used with OpenMapTiles. I cannot find a reference to that in your blog post.
My answer applies to a number of types of servers that sit in front of web applications. You asked about security and performance. I’ll give you a few ways that an extra box can help in those areas.

For security, you want a strong OS with this little code as possible in your overall system. Proxy-style apps can be very simple compared to web, application servers. They can filter incoming traffic, validate the input, or even change it to something safer (or faster) to parse. They can also run on OS’s that are harder to attack: OpenBSD; GenodeOS; INTEGRITY-178B. On availability, putting load-balancing, monitoring, and recovery in these systems is often safer since app servers are more likely to crash.

On performance, the first benefit is that the simple, focused app can have a highly-optimized implementation. From there, one can use hardware accelerators (CPU or PCI) to speed up compression or encryption. Also called offloading. The most, cost-effective setup has many commodity servers benefiting from a few, high-cost servers capable of offloading. Some have load-balancing to route incoming traffic to servers able to handle it best to minimize use of costly resources.

So, there’s a few ways that proxy-type servers can help in security and performance.
Adventures, a brand-new gamified learning experience
Scratch from MIT labs! This is what all the kids at hacking time use to learn coding in SV.
I hope this idea makes the rounds. It's so terrible when you have to learn the idiosyncratic nomenclature of products.

It feels like it was already worse some years ago, but this piece spells it out.
And, ironically, gives the problem a name, which is a good thing in this case.
I don't think people on here who downvoted you understand the sheer scale of data center load growth. Utilities can handle some load growth sure, but the requests from the AI folks are crazy large to the tune of GW. I think it's fair to ask if training the next chat bot and related needs are worth doubling our electricity consumption.
Why People Quit Religion–and How They Find Meaning Again
Yep!

https://viewport-tester.com

The detailed text on the modal says:
We can only load URLs that pass standard pattern checks.
Yandex already does. Bing has cache as well.
> A general "if it ain't broke don't fix it".

It's much more "will this cost us even a tiny bit more to implement compared to the status quo? Then no". US companies don't hesitate to innovate if it will save them money, especially in the short term (line must go up).
I agree that this approach would be pretty unwieldy for a large/complex backend schema. It worked quite well for a smaller, in-house application and set of requirements. I think I probably would be perfectly happy using the approach again for our in-house applications if requirements for audit/history preservation needed to be built into a data model. I don't have a good feeling for when I might say "this data model is too large/complex for this approach." I might instead think more about what and how many subsystems are going to have direct access to the RDBMS as a cut-off?

Hospital/medical research information systems (my day job is in the backends of these apps) seem to use backends with many compromises and poor db designs bolted on. I have also dealt with the horror of electronic data capture forms. My most recent headache has been a poor data model that ultimately wraps each form in a very ugly JSON blob. I've never seen anything that so completely lacks any residue of design . . .
For me, Reverse proxy helps me keep my origin server only for 1 purpose: Serve the Application. Everything else, I can handle with Reverse Proxy including TLS Termination, load balancing, URL rewrites, Security (WAF etc) if needed. Separation of duties for me.

Overall, the benefit is that you can keep your origin server protected and only serve relevant traffic. Also, lets say you offer custom domain to your own customers and in that case, you could always swap out the origin server (if needed) without worrying about DNS changes for your customers as they are pointing to the reverse proxy and not your origin server directly.
A startup that I worked at that worked on municipal water infrastructure often had to sell to rural areas first because they didn't have a rollout of complex existing systems to decouple and migrate. I suspect that's analogous to what OP is describing; a situation where the entrenched system is difficult to replace because the operations of it are now engrained and well-understood.

For what it's worth, I think you're both right to some degree.
I think that would be an uphill battle. The money that flowed to Caroline looked like: a base salary of $200,000 a year, semiannual bonuses of up to $20 million, a de minimis equity stake in FTX, and no equity in Alameda. I don’t know what SBF’s salary or bonuses (if any) looked like, but he had a controlling stake in FTX, 90% of Alameda, and borrowed from his companies several times for hundreds of millions at a time. Caroline was nominally the CEO of Alameda but she clearly was not the one in charge of the corporate empire, and if she was masterminding the fraud she did a very poor job of monetizing it.

It’s also not strictly he-said/she-said; there were at least two other executives who knew what was going on, both of whom implicated Sam as the mastermind.
Scratch from MIT labs is what all the 9-12 yo kids at Hackingtons use to learn game dev in Silicon Valley. Have fun!
The grandparent was mistaken about an intent to conquer "all" of Europe - but similar threats have been made against Poland and the Baltics (as Putin's appetite for direct annexation seems to be limited to territories of the former Russian Empire).

Communicating through sockpuppets like Medvedev is exactly how a gaslighter par excellence like Putin operates. And Medvedev isn't just any Kremlin flacky, but was Putin's nominal successor at one point. To pretend to not be aware that his messaging on the subject is ultimately Putin's is quite strange, to put it politely.
Elecrow responded, apologized for AI voice cloning
It's not really so much about the 'promotion' as such but the sameyness and repetition. There's lots of mod comments explaining this but a very stripped down explanation is that posting the same/related stuff over and over is repetitive and boring which is the opposite of the aim of HN.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so...
We used this model to distribute translations, feature flags, configuration, search indexes, etc at Airbnb. But instead of SQLite we used Sparkey, a KV file format developed by Spotify. In early years there was a Cron job on every box that pulled that service’s thingies; then once we switched to Kubernetes we used a deamomset & host tagging (taints?) to pull a variety of thingies to each host and then ensure the services that use the thingies only ran on the hosts that had the thingies.

In Ruby we called this “hammerspace” https://github.com/airbnb/hammerspace
in math they use a lot of approximations to do calculations like limits -> infinity. It's a good enough approximation that is almost unrefutable. Also, who has more ego, we are the winner of 1 in 10e30, or there is way more winners.
So conviction is a "trap door" of evidence weight? If someone is convicted based on evidence that is later shown to be totally insufficient to support that conviction, this new information does nothing to overturn the conviction?
System Intiative is generally available
Which is exactly what the site says. To insert dynamic conditions. I know that you can use 1=1 for the same reasons as trailing commas. But kinda obvious that this is not the case here.
Appears to be okay now. Your status page is okay and a playground image gen service ( https://huggingface.co/spaces/black-forest-labs/FLUX.1-schne... ) works.
Your communication style in this thread is adversarial and curt, yet you aim to provide good service. You clearly have a very, very long personal journey ahead of you if you want to satisfy the good service objective.
A lot of people have money to invest, and are eager to understand the world of finance. That doesn't necessarily apply to other fields.
I wasn't aware of the dropped API - good to know. The gun thing is excellent, thanks for sharing!
Haha funny! Yeh we disabled that, in part, because it can result in an infinite loop.
> Veteran developer Drew DeVault, founder and CEO of SourceHut and a critic of Rust in the Linux kernel

> I am known to be a bit of a polemic when it comes to Rust

> Rust will eventually fail to the “jack of all trades, master of none” problem that C++ has. Wise languages designers start small and stay small. Wise systems programmers extend this philosophy to designing entire systems, and Rust is probably not going to be invited. I understand that many people, particularly those already enamored with Rust, won’t agree with much of this article. But now you know why we are still writing C, and hopefully you’ll stop bloody bothering us about it.

Do you have anything to support your statement?
It was one of the biggest considerations that made me decide against moving to the USA.

One of my coworkers took advantage of the L1 Visa (which I can still qualify for) and she ended up moving back to my home country Uruguay even though she made 50% higher salary in USA.

She did live some of the worst stuff in USA like Texas electricity failures, 20.000 dollar healthcare bills, etc.
Welcome! I hope you get a few more perspectives too :)
> Costco (and similar) put significant effort into buying and presenting high quality goods.

That's a subjective statement. Costco's brands and products have been so consistently poor (and overpriced), we switched to Sams Club.
The funny part of your example is, decoding AArch64 instructions (argubly, "parsing") is also easier than decoding x86_64.

Yet GP's point still holds.
Rippling Introduces AI-Based Tool to Evaluate Enginners
Yeah, but no person who would worry about this would have made the IA in the first place. IA itself is a massive copyright suit waiting to happen.

I know, I know, if you were them and had bought bitcoin at $10 you would have sold at precisely the top at $70k per and neither before nor after.
Cool. And how is that even remotely relevant to anything related to the topic of hand?

If your argument made any sense, you'd be using GDP per capita. And there the US is beaten by e.g. Switzerland, Ireland, Norway (skipping microstates) and all of them are around a decade ahead of the US in banking, at least.
> LWN never once mentioned any blogs or opinions from kernel developers or otherwise unless they were in support of Rust.

Others please visit the links and see for yourself.

It's bare coverage. A few sentences when something notable happens. What do they say? Re: 1, it's a few nice sentences about Wedson after he leaves. Re: 2, it's one sentence and quote from a kernel dev.

Moreover, are we seriously trying to work the refs, as if LWN is NBC or Fox News, in this dispute? If you know of something interesting said be anti-Rust persons within the Linux kernel community, just share it with us. No reason it needs to be intermediated by LWN.

> Meanwhile, The Register[3] cited at least Drew DeVault among others:

AFAIK Drew Devault isn't a Linux kernel developer?

And re: 3, this blog post is like Drew's other blog posts. It is, excuse me, unthoughtful and incurious. Like all of Drew's writing, it is an Epistemic Closure Express to "Another Drew hobby horse". This time it was "Drew doesn't like Rust again." Is it any wonder someone else didn't want to include his bad writing for what?... Balance?

I think it's perfectly reasonable to have doubts about Rust in the Linux kernel. I'm sure there are many well qualified devs with interesting, learned views on the subject. Drew is not a such a person.

I have written reams about how Drew makes poor arguments. If you're curious, or don't think my case is well made here, you can my other comments re: Drew:

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41404644
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41409049
That's such a silly take I can't know if you're even serious.

Not that many important people block Elon, but even if they did, Elon could just ask the team to adjust his client / account accordingly especially if it doesn't give him any special (non-public) rights
Previous submission with comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38938402
Previous HN thread for context: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41614490

For those who prefer video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHuPWQz9AlI
Do conversations you have throughout the day with people in your neighborhood feel like a waste?
lindyFrame

Not limited to games, and also setup to share with others. Already
repository for various plugins to the platform. TicTacToe, etc.

http://dandymadeproductions.com/projects/lindyFrame/lindyFra...
My impression was that it seemed like a big intriguing maybe, not something like a verified fact.
The buyer's agent handles some matters of the contract like properly notifying the seller of defects found during an inspection by form. There's a process for that that is meant to prevent the buyer from disadvantaging the seller if the house ends up back on the market. There are other things the buyer's agent does, like ours would sometimes temper our reactions when representing us to the seller's agent. She would also let us know when items on the contingency timeline were expiring and what our options were after those deadlines. That's not something I had the time to figure out on my own.
It’s a spirit from the old Internet that we’ve all but lost. Replaced with the toxic “write for engagement” spirit that brought us SEO, blogspam, influencers, “YouTube Face” thumbnails, ragebait, and now AI slop.

Same for writing and releasing open source software. Write software that you want to write and don’t worry about how many users you have or how many pull requests you get or how many GitHub stars you have. These are empty vanity metrics, and another side of the same “write for engagement” coin.
> "I keep this blog for me to write, not necessarily for others to read."

This is now to me the "old school" internet creator attitude (that I still possess). I don't blog as much any more but do create content elsewhere - a lot of it is for my own enjoyment and creative outlet, to blow off steam, whatever - the fact that other people may want to watch it is secondary. I do try to do things people want, but only if I want to do it.

The only reason I highlight this is that the up and coming generations absolutely do not see content creation in the same way. I got in an absurd argument with an early 20 something on a social media platform about how annoying ads were that were disguised as content. The response was overwhelmingly "Well, how else do you expect content creators to make a living?"

I do not disagree that creators should be able to monetize their content however they please, but the fact that people see that as the end and only goal of content creation is baffling to me and almost certainly making it worse. This same person tried to tell me it's been the same way since the earliest days of youtube - which they would have been in diapers around that time - is absolutely not true. The idea of content creation as a full time career is relatively new, and I hate it. The worst part is if you don't participate in the type of obnoxious engagement hacking or buried ads that these "professional" creators do, the algorithms punish you for it.
Hahahahahaha, ahhh that makes sense. I didn't think about it getting suck in a loop.
This is not true, you can reverse SEPA transfers via your bank. You do need a reason though and there are time limits but if a seller just runs away with your money you don't have to go through the courts in the general case.
That's very cool, but just to point out: that's not JTAG, it's serial (UART).

JTAG is a much lower level protocol, typically used for hardware or low-level software debugging. Serial/UART gives you a command-line interface to the software that's running.

Using a JTAG interface is a lot more complicated. If you're interested in playing with it, check out OpenOCD.
It is reminiscent of XCode in its icons and panels.
As I wrote, different folks will already be chasing more immediate projects as they're too attractive: Think masters students, industry labs, startups, etc.

Rules are meant to be broken. For example, a professor will often put a masters student on a cute me-too one-off project in a hot area as the short-termism helps the student have a smoother time, and the professor is trading expected low impact in the the project for a cheap shot to see if there is a more interesting question behind the immediate one.

Much of the PhD is about learning to spot & navigate problems, not solutions. Young PhD students can totally pick the same me-too problems of masters students. The advisors would likely just think the student is using the same approach to seeing where the PhD worthy problem is. If still nothing, should be ready to drop the topic, or if they truly love me-too work more than the PhD process, leave for a better environment for that, like a company / industry lab / startup throwing more resources at the problem.

Also, not every phd needs to do the original topic of attempting impact. You can totally use the PhD years to learn how to do me-too & unimpactful work or even the most weird & niche problems: as long as at least one advisor thinks they can stay funded while supporting you, most programs will let you through.
What Can We Remove
At Yaak we are building workflows for training end-to-end AI for robotics. Towards that we’ve open-sourced rbyte. With the latest release we've added support for building training batches (PyTorch tensordict) directly from a list of mcap files(s).

Would be great to get your opinion and feedback on rbyte. A sample NuScenes-v1.0 config is in the repo for you to try out. If there public robotics datasets in mcap, which you would like us to support in rbyte, please feel free ping us.
deliver the joke

with tinderbox-dry humor

enjoy the whooshes
The algorithm in TFA, as I understand it, requires the scheduler to constantly monitor the queue lengths and reschedule the workers appropriately, as opposed to manually estimating the required number of workers for each stage and then never changing it.
Some percentage of that spending does turn into actual economic investments in those local towns. Infrastructure gets built because of it. Homes are built. Shops are built. Tax revenues get collected to build schools to educate new generations of citizens. New technologies are made, new industries grown, etc. So even with your specific definition of investment that spending did spur some of it. Land is improved. Positive productivity, economic exports.

> An investment is something that provides positive return over time

That's one definition, implying it will just continue to give a return. Like dividends. Another would be "an act of devoting time, effort, or energy to a particular undertaking with the expectation of a worthwhile result." A definition on Wikipedia is "commitment of resources to achieve later benefits". All the spending is investing in knowledge of space, material science, biology, and more, hopefully for a worthwhile result.

One could say, "a student invested a lot of time studying for their sixth-grade math exam". Very much an acceptable statement to make, I don't think most would argue it is improper English. Is that strongly tied to positive productivity and economic exports? Did passing that test directly affect the GDP of the country?

Either way, the people I'm replying to weren't trying to debate the semantic differences between "investing" and "spending", and that wasn't really my main point. I do agree there are differences in this, but that can often be a matter of opinion and perspective.
I wrote up the iterator-driven for back in 2011, because it was one of those things that had been long-since forgotten about; along with what it would look like were it to be incorporated into the (then) C++ standard.

I am fortunate enough to own a copy of the High C/C++ Language Reference in English. (-:

* http://jdebp.uk./FGA/metaware-iterator-driven-for.html

* http://jdebp.uk./Proposals/metaware-iterator-driven-for.html