skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
How it is different from Redis?

Keys at root level having a common prefix can be queried optimally

SCANKEYS/SCANKVS/KEYS/KVS commands returns the results in sorted order

Unlike Redis SCAN(opens in a new tab), Treds SCAN always returns count number of data if data is there

Unlike Redis ZRANGEBYLEX(opens in a new tab), Treds ZRANGELEX always returns data irrespective of score, basically data across different scores are returned

It has Sorted Maps instead of Sorted Sets. So we can create a Sorted Key/Value pair with associated with a score

New command - DELPREFIX - Deletes all keys having a common prefix and returns number of keys deleted

Currently, it only has Key/Value store, Sorted Maps store, List store, Set store and Hash store and only supports strings/number as values
So does this imply that the phrase "entangled system" doesn't mean anything about a specific system but rather indicates which types of statistics govern a class of systems produced en mass?
I mean, it’s the same as trademark disputes; legal standards will slowly be cobbled together from statutes, regulations, and random judges setting precedent. “Confusion in the marketplace” seems like a potentially relevant term — accidentally producing a product similar to an existing person’s voice is one thing, but publishing it in a manner and/or context that makes it seem like that person recorded the lines is something else entirely.

Anyway, given how the election is shaking out on Twitter, I have a feeling political usage will spark legislation and precedent far before commercial usage does. But that’s just a plain guess
That’s California in a nut shell.

Be as weird and unique as you want, as long as it’s an ‘ok’ kind of weird and unique and you’ve filled out the right forms and gotten the correct insurance first.

Or if you’re homeless, do whatever.
Then you'd be able to prove that you actually did that, for one.
This whole argument rests on the absurd assumption that you can "own" a voice as if it's property. Does this mean people can own the patterns of vibration in air? It's completely nonsensical.
This is essentially the Bohr take on the matter. There is no physicality in the sense that we interact with the world in. There are also no real dimensions as they are just our understanding of what we consider the physical world.

If that gets around your head, you’ll throw the physicality and real world away and you’ll come to see everything as information interaction.
Anecdata, but I found the very same issue (the bermuda triangle gap between radioboxes, but also checkboxes, and their labels) in a project a few months ago.

It seemed a pretty big deal to me, specially because I always clicked on the gap, and got frustrated and angry at this. So I reported it to the UX team managing the design system, and to the developers implementing the design system, and nobody really cared. Some people even tried to convince me this behaviour was OK (because other design systems worked that way too, or because they were planning to refactor this on the far future so they didn't want to spend time on this).

I think the industry is now filled with people that just don't care, specially on big companies where, if it's not in a ticket, and if the ticket is not prioritized as critical, nobody cares. All they care about are metrics (test coverage, line count of a function, whatever). Pretty sad actually.
We don't know that its just a timestamp, look up Discord Snowflake, which is a unique user ID with a timestamp to boot.
Flappy Bird for Android, only C, under 100KB
You can own your likeness. Does that mean you can own the photos that represent your face? Yes, yes you can. Why should you voice be different?
That PDF surprisingly does not define what "MIP" stands for, but I was able to deduce that it stands for Mixed Integer Programming.
How do you use those outside of Latex? Lots of figures are coming from Matlab or Python, where Latex is a non-starter. Is there a cookbook to pollinate?
The idea that stolen voice tones are going to matter at all is one of the shortest sighted bits of AI investment - powered by Hollywood "never make anything new" thinking.

In about 5 years AI voices will be bespoke and more pleasant to listen to then any real human: they're not limited by vocal cord stress, can be altered at will, and can easily be calibrated by surveying user engagement.

Subtly tweaking voice output and monitoring engagement is going to be the way forward.
The danger of this shit can not be understated. Four years ago already there was a video where a deepfake of a president of the USA read a speech: In Event of Moon Disaster https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWLadJFI8Pk we of course know Nixon never gave this speech.

What happens when this "AI" is used to sway an election?

Last month a family got hospitalized after eating mushrooms they found and identified from a AI generated book. They didn't know it was AI generated. What happens when and this is not if, alas but when people die from this?

This shit is a danger to democracy and human lives. Napster was not.
> This Jeff Geerling which I have never heard of

This guy doesn't have 1/10000 of the relevance Metallica had at the time

It's weird that you seem to think a person's level of fame is relevant to a discussion of their legal rights.
Qualcomm's recent issues include their contract with Microsoft to provide chips for the Co-Pilot+ pcs ends in November. And CoPilot PCs with Qualcomm's Snapdragon X Elite chips have serious performance issues playing games. See my tech news site about this: https://asiaviewnews.com/gigabots/threads?p=20008 and https://asiaviewnews.com/gigabots/threads?p=10006
But the wording makes it like it's about revisions.
Like everything in computer security, it's complicated, and there are tradeoffs.

First, intercepting SMS is not that easy. It's "easy" for someone who knows what they are doing and is willing to expend some resources, but it's not a casual attack that can be mounted by a script kiddie. It's a lot easier to steal your phone number using a social engineering attack. The easiest one to execute is to impersonate you somehow and get your number transferred to a "new" phone. That one got me a few years ago. Very scary.

Second, in order to exploit an SMS attack you have to be able to link the number to e.g. a bank account. One mitigation for this is to use different and non-obvious user IDs for critical accounts.

Third, despite its weaknesses, SMS 2FA is better than no 2FA at all. Even if breaking SMS is "easy" it's still an additional cost for a prospective hacker. You don't have to outrun the bear.

But it is good to be aware that SMS 2FA is weak. It's better than nothing, but for things that are really mission-critical you should seek alternatives.
Intellectual property is, in fact, recognized by many legal jurisdictions. And audio works are typically included in that.

However, in this situation, the right of publicity is probably more applicable.
One of my favorite franchises, and although I would love to see a new Fable game come out, I fear I'd wind up with a Saints game. Completely disconnected from the original game. Ridiculous.

Just looked up Saints Row reboot again, it flopped so hard that they shutdown the studio behind it, making the game literal abandon-ware. Yikes.
Hot-Wiring the iPhone 16: New Battery Removal and Complete Teardown [video]
"Why should child porn be illegal? It's just a pattern of bits on a computer!"

Describing a reasonable legal principle in terms of physics phenomena does not make it unreasonable.
In terms of personality rights, it is relevant. Although I would think Jeff is enough of a public figure to make a case here
Just Googled and came to know they sold their stake in PC division to another Japanese company called Sharp in 2018, this Sharp then later rebranded as Dynabook. But it no longer has the same traction as original Toshiba, nor is it available on most online ecommerce stores.
To judge one's actions is to judge one's beliefs, because beliefs drive action. I go to the gym because I believe it'll make me healthier. I eat beef because I believe it to be one of the most beneficial foods on the planet. I teach my kids to think critically, because I believe it will serve them well in life. I act in accordance with my beliefs, and you act in accordance with yours. Actions are dictated by beliefs.
With enough of a "vibration pattern", it becomes a fingerprint.
because there is no information transmitted once you've measured one of the entangled particles.

The other particle never knows the first one was measured.

Consider the analogy that in a box there are two apples. A Red delicious and a green apple. You and a friend close your eyes and take one and go home. You know look at your apple -- its red. Now you know your friend as a Green one without asking them. Was information magically transmitted? No. Was that faster than light communication? No. Could you keep taking apples out of boxes to transmit data? no
One click is all it takes. That’s the lowest on the totem pole of social engineering.
I’d love to see what performance benchmarks look like. The old ones were highly optimized, but perhaps for different challenges than today’s architectures present.
IndieInnova stands out by not only promoting AI technology but actively enhancing business efficiency through tailored AI content, specialized consulting, and innovative projects. We prioritize practical, accessible AI tools and provide authoritative comparisons and reviews to guide businesses and professionals in making informed decisions about the AI technologies that will best advance their operations.
I expect spamassin will work as well as it always did. The difference now is that we're not allowed fine-grained control over whats spammed at us.
I'm going to level with you. I read the informal overview and only understood about half of it.

I still have zero concept of why it's impossible. Help?
> A fact of life: Nearly always people with money, power, and optimization problems don't understand optimization, fear and resent those who do, and choose just to avoid the subject.

Food for thought: the solution to real-world optimization problems is often dictated by constraints instead of optimal values.

This means that if you fail to understand the constraints, or even fail to identify them, then whatever your solution to the problem is, it will be wrong. And it will be obvious to those who are aware of the constraints.

Now, you're complaining that those presenting you with problems "don't understand optimization".
From your anecdotes you were the one tasked with clarifying things to them. From the sound of it, you didn't accomplished that, and it was unclear to stakeholders whether your output even provided any value worth keeping.

Have you ever considered the possibility that you failed to understand the actual problems presented to you and even failed to clarify why your output was aligned with anyone's best interests?
They were always called Dynabooks by Toshiba[1] and still continue to be sold today, but they retreated to only selling in Japan a long time ago and Toshiba ultimately sold the Dynabook brand off to Sharp in 2018 as part of selling off most of their businesses to avoid bankruptcy.

For those who aren't aware, Toshiba is the quintessential example of Japanese Exceptionalising Into Failure(tm)[2].

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynabook_Inc.

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujio_Masuoka
> It's saying that it could be either +/-50 ppm from the actual reading, or +/-5% from the actual reading, whichever is worse.

No, it's stacked, and strictly applicable between 400-3000 ppm as characterized (despite 0-32000 ppm operating range by design).

At the lower 400 ppm end, accuracy is +/- 50 ppm +/- 20 ppm = +/- 70 ppm.

At the upper 3000 ppm end, accuracy is +/- 50 ppm +/- 150 ppm = +/- 170 ppm.

Also worth noting that the calibrated reference used to determine this published accuracy has an uncertainty of +/- 2%; ref datahseet[1] Table 7.

Caveat emptor: this published accuracy can't be trusted at face value when sampling more than 1 meas/min; ref ibid.[1] Table 4.

[1] https://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon-PASCO2V15-DataSheet-v...
there is a source of volatiles "close" by - earth. with all that water in the atmosphere you can build satellites that orbit low and siphon it and other valuable gases like nitrogen off. The Satellites would use aerodynamic effects and the siphoned atmosphere for propulsion.

As for Solar cells there are factors to consider - they would degrade differently than cells in low earth orbit since factors like atomic oxygen and thermal cycling are less of an issue while I imagine micrometeorites are just terrible. Modern cells degrade at at 0.5% per year in LEO. At 1%/year degradation that means you have 85% capacity after 15 years. So we are talking decades for cells once they have been manufactured here. Cells not in the sun would last forever so they do not degrade in storage.

In the case of the diggers I have not done the math on thermal propagation through bedrock but It would all depend on when the people in orbit start building a sunshade at L1.

the pingers are not in the deep ocean. They are whatever depth the water is below 30°. Some considerations of diving change if you cannot or not plan to surface - ever. We are talking open diving bell environments here and heh - topmarines or ü-boats :)
They have a very easy source of energy in the gradient between the very hot atmosphere and the cooler ocean water. no need for nukes for power. you distill oxygen as a byproduct of that snorkeling process. main issue would be metals.
it seemed to me that the bottleneck mostly revolved around the layers that were in system ram and that a lack of vram was really the gating factor in terms of reasonable inference performance. (although i would imagine that there's probably some more optimization that could be done to make best use of a split vram/sysram setup.)

in any event it was fun to try out, but still didn't seem anywhere near how well the hosted models work. a heavy duty workstation with a bunch of gpus/vram would probably be a different story though.
The Bell experiment is one test of entanglement. There is a whole class of tasks that you can do only if you have access to entangled systems. Take another one to see how the implication you state doesn't follow.

For example, quantum teleportation is only possible if you have a source that produces entangled particles. If I want to test that you have such a source, I can give you a random state (which only I know), and ask you to teleport it to a far away location [1]. If you indeed have an entangled particle source, then you can successfully teleport the state 100% of the time. However, because measurements in quantum mechanics are probabilistic, I can't actually single-shot verify that you teleported the correct state. So we will have to repeat this task many times [2], and with each success I will be more and more sure that you have an entangled state source.

Now coming to your musing above: "rather indicates which types of statistics govern a class of systems produced en mass"

You can see why this is not consistent with the repeated teleportation experiment. If every single teleportation test succeeded individually, then every iteration must have involved an entangled state. The repeat is only because of my inability to verify in single-shot. Surely then, entanglement is a property of specific systems, rather one of a class of systems.

If you want to read this more substantially (and you have graduate level of mathematics knowledge), quantum resource theories is the area you are looking into.

[1] There are some assumptions on your honesty required here.

[2] Each time using a different random state.
To answer in reverse order: it doesn't need a gensym because it isn't introducing a new variable. The only variable being used is `dir`, and that is passed in.

As for why it's a macro rather than a function, I don't know, but it's possible that one of the features (probably variable substitution) is important.

(frobnicate (mcd (foo bar)))

Gets expanded to:

(frobnicate (fg
(mkdir -p (foo bar))
(cd (foo bar))))

At compile-time. I personally would have used a function declared inline, though.
It’s the Wild West and will be for some time but I agree, they should have the decency to use only voices of the dear departed. The library should be open source and hosted on GitHub. the talking dead seems like a good name for it. Obviously we will have to put it to a vote among the living.
A more accurate title would have not claimed its not WordPress, but moreso emphasized that WP Engine does not provide historic record of your blog posts by default, which every other WP host does, because its how WordPress was designed. Weird title, feels misleading.
Sounds like you opened up the newspaper and scanned for “mathematician”. Leveraging phd research into a great job is a tough. Re-skilling into a normie engineer/technician/analyst, is not.

My point is not to criticize your job hunting skills, it’s to suggest that this an undue psychological burden in your life and is perhaps masking other causes and personal challenges.
Easy: The air is free but the electromagnetic spectrum is regulated.

/s
> It's a running joke at this point, because Japanese cannot compromise quality to make costs reasonable.

An old anecdote:

A company places an order to produce some gizmo through a Japanese firm. The order states what is could be "up to three non-working gizmos per one hundred in the final shipment". The order is completed, the employee comes to get it, sees a big packed boxes and a small one. He asks "what's in the big boxes?" and receives "That's your one hundred gizmos, like you ordered". He asks again "But what is in this small box there?" and receives "That's your three non-working gizmos, like you ordered".
PyFlyt: UAV Sim Environments for Reinforcement Learning
AI Creation and the Cosmic Host [pdf]
As someone who hasn't heard of him before, from the first few seconds of this video, I'd say it sounds similar enough to be an imperfect AI clone. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMofZIT9FcQ
That is a weird take which is not informed by an understanding of how business operates.

It is 100% an _exclusive dealing_ mechanism. (This is a term of art for a business strategy which may not be legal in the current context, by the way.) It was undoubtedly implemented because it's a way to make more money. Businesses love imposing exclusive dealing. It can reduce their competition and increase their margins. We have businesses all over the American economy doing it.

Now does this particular case of exclusive dealing also serve to reduce theft? Perhaps it does, a case can be made. But what is 100% certain is that anti-theft was not the motive for doing exclusive dealing. It's the other way around. The FTC recognizes that. Any nominally honest judge or business executive would recognize that. Anti-theft is an afterthought compared to the billions in profits at stake.
> Yup. Applied Optimization 101: For decisions in life and career, avoid the applied math approach to optimization.

It pains me to say this, but might it ever crossed your mind that the problem does not lie in applied mathematics of even optimization?

We need soft skills to push the output from hard skills, and interacting with decision-makers requires people skills, not hard skills.

If you can't communicate with someone, it doesn't really matter what the numbers say. Do you get what I mean?
And the txr lisp virtual machine there is a t0 register, which is always nil, and that symbol can be used as an alias for it in the assembly. This was consciously inspired by the MIPS $zero.

A write to t0 is not simply ignored. It will generate an exception. Another MIPS-like thing is that t1 is an assembler temporary.
Why not? Because AT&T doesn’t like selling stuff for other telecom companies. In fact the only reason they have stores is to sell wireless services. If you don’t want their service, they don’t want to sell phones to you from their stock.

Something I learned from an AT&T store
Others have mentioned the technical reasons, so I’ll go with something else.

Some of us remember Ballmer calling our freedom a “cancer.”

Trust is built slowly yet dashed quickly. There are so many respectful choices today. Little reason to pick the once abusive but rehabilitated.

This comment about MS caught with its hands in the cookie jar always makes me laugh: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31727293
I dont see any indication that it runs on Linux, I'll stick to Jan which is free.
>Last month a family got hospitalized after eating mushrooms they found and identified from a AI generated book.

Yeah, mushrooms are very dangerous, but the argument here is that the book could be written by a human. So what's the best way forward? Ban A.I. books, and human books?

A.I. also, is the best way IMHO to identify mushrooms. Mushrooms are drastically different from one another by magnifying their spores using a microscope. That's not the case when looking at the fruit. Mushrooms totally unrelated to one another, may turn out to be very similar, depending on season, humidity, rain, elevation, tree hosts, temperature and soil.

However when a human tries to examine the spores, he has to compare the spores to thousands of mushrooms to be sure. That's an amount of information, that only mechanically could be tackled effectively. A.I. may have a good chance to solve that problem.
More like owning an identity or likeness, which is a fundamental basis of many fraud cases. It seems that Jeff Geerling is a resident of Missouri which also has Supreme Court precedent to test for "Right of Publicity" [1]:

"If a product is being sold that predominantly exploits the commercial value of an individual's identity, that product should be held to violate the right of publicity and not be protected by the First Amendment, even if there is some "expressive" content in it that might qualify as "speech" in other circumstances."

Whether or not the voice is determined to be predominant would be for courts to decide, of course, but there's clearly an argument.

1: https://law.justia.com/cases/missouri/court-of-appeals/2006/...
> you will have to accept that users either ask this UAC to be turned off

Running with UAC disabled under an admin account?

That's not only a lack of a seatbelt, but wearing a flip-flops too.

And I'm eating my dogfood too, I'm running under a regular user since migrated from Vista, both on personal and work devices. Sometimes it's PITA, sure, but it's manageable.
Jailing someone is also something perpetrators think must be done for the greater good of all. I honestly don't understand the comparison at all. Plenty of things are done for a greater good. Some of them work better than others.

Similarly, bloodletting and modern medicine have the same purpose (making the patient feel better), but one of them is better than another.
Yes, but 1000 phones aren't normally in the cards for poor people unless they're financing via carrier or using a tax refund. Before switching into software, I spent most of my mid-late 20s under the poverty line, I never had a high-end phone. But cheap android phones are readily available, here's one [0] for $100 USD that honestly looks like an absolutely fine phone.

IME people who are poor enough to not be able to get a contract with a carrier buy a phone at Walmart and then do prepaid carriers. This has the 'fun' side effect that they get a new number whenever they have to switch phone plans. These switches aren't deliberate, they just run out of money to keep up the old prepaid line, go a week or 3 without a phone, then sign up again. Porting the old number is too much work/time, so they just end up with a new phone number. Its just one of the shitty things about poverty.

[0] https://www.bestbuy.com/site/motorola-moto-g-play-2023-32gb-...
Regarding Itanium, that could be just by chance because Fujitsu is the main (or almost only) seller of supercomputers in Japan partnered with HP. Also interesting however is how they switched to it from SPARC and actually kept using SPARC longer than the west.