skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I am sure that I don't understand the specifics of what Porsche is doing, but the article says the cycle is intake-compression-power-compression-power-exhaust. For that to be the case they have to be burning the same fuel and air mixture twice, and I don't understand the chemistry there enough to even speculate how it works.

I think it's safe to assume that the second stroke is burning incomplete combustion products left over from the first stroke. I think that the second compression stroke would have to be higher compression than the first in order to get more complete combustion of what's left behind.
> blaming consumers

Why not blame consumers which would dispose their garbage wherever they want instead of a bin? I would rather criminalize this. It's so easy to put an empty plastic bottle in a bin yet they insist on throwing it on the ground.
Defect Challenges Grow at the Wafer Edge
I'm always fascinated by these ancient archeological finds, like someone made this thing 3000+ years ago and it somehow survived. Like the only known surviving Roman scutum shield [1].

It should be noted taht we have a lot of misconceptions about ancient warfare. Swords were largely ceremonial, probably owned by officers (muhc like even modern militaries have sabers as part of dress uniforms).

The dominant weapon in ancient warfare was the spear, not the sword. Why? Because it's relatively easy to teach to use, it's effective against cavalary and easy to use in formation, as in 3 rows (or more) of men could have spears facing forward.

Ancient egyptians at this time were hoplites [2]. They did have swords but they were close-quarter weapons, probably for dealing with survivors when a formation breaks down. And hoplites were followed by Greek phalanxes and ultimately Roman legions.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scutum_from_Dura-Europos

[2]: https://owlcation.com/humanities/Ancient-Egyptian-Battle-Tac...
Bro you should be requiring accounts to download HTML. Come on man.
Anyone knows if there is something similar for FreeBSD?
I switched from WordPress to Eleventy in 2020 and never looked back.

https://www.joshcanhelp.com/taking-wordpress-to-eleventy/

I currently host on Netlify because it’s free but you could easily sync the generated HTML files to a box you manage.
VFS+XFS Changes Land in Linux 6.12 to Support Block Sizes Larger Than Page Size
It also solves a problem many of the other solutions here miss: the prompt is printed once and so it can easily be showing stale information if you change the current context in another shell.

With kubie entering a context copies the configuration to a new file and sets KUBECONFIG appropriately, so it is not affected by changes in another shell.
Honestly, I'm split on this, “It Depends.”

I like dark environments while coding, reading short text (Text, WhatsApp), photos, videos, etc., but I like light environments for browsing, reading, writing (Text, Markdown), etc.

I've set up my macOS with a Dark Theme for the Menubar and Dock but a light theme overall.
Meta dropped that term, actually, and that's an unofficial website.
Not really the ideal way to approach HN, although understandable.

If you're considering HN from a forum perspective, the best advice I've read is to think of 'points' as currency to spend on unpopular opinions. After a certain point, you can 'afford' to say whatever's on your mind (within reason). Reddit is the same. You rack up 'karma' so that you can afford to take some downvotes for speaking your mind.

Now, the other dynamic is that some people here expect to see and work with other HN folks in the real world. THAT is more chilling, and I don't think one could be one's 'authentic self' in that instance unless you're already a 'name' who doesn't need to give a rip about others' opinions.
Working with compressed (ZSTD) binary data on AWS IoT Core
How many kernel system calls do runtimes make?
For the first part of your question about the other replicas, docker will load balance between all of the replicas either with a VIP or by returning multiple IPs in the DNS request[0]. I didn't check if this proxy balances across multiple records returned in a DNS request but, at least in the case of VIP-based load balancing, should work like you would expect.

For the second part about updating the service, I'm a little less clear. I guess the expectation would be to bring up a differently-named service within the same network, and then `kamal-proxy deploy` it? So maybe the expectation is for service names to include a version number? Keeping the old version hot makes sense if you want to quickly be able to route back to it.

[0]: https://docs.docker.com/reference/compose-file/deploy/#endpo...
Or at your own benefit. As with any legal agreement you enter into. Also, you might be able to reach out to them, pay them, and obtain a different license. It is easier to see if this is worth the effort by seeing the source code first.
Your understanding is very out of date.

All electric sports cars have been a thing for a while, even at the supercar level. Car enthusiasts have in fact embraced electrics. Go on youtube and look up drag race comparison races and a Model S Plaid is very frequently the one people want to beat.

Double clutched automatics have taken over h pattern manuals.
Hexo for generation and hosted on Github Pages.

https://i.hsfzxjy.site
Parent states that it's always "cargo build" which in 90% of the cases, is true.

Except for the projects that would require something like "cargo build --feature=wayland" for example, in order to run.

So "cargo build" ends up not being universal, and adding make will make it just "make build" regardless of what flags people use with cargo, meaning it's more universal than "cargo build".
I'm not sure why anybody would respect that licence term, given the whole field rests on the rapacious misappropriation of other people's intellectual property.
I thought maybe I was using the phrase wrong, but the first two definitions I find are "the internal sense of being good enough and worthy of love and belonging from others" and "a feeling that you are a good person who deserves to be treated with respect". You'll note that those are both inherently social. And both "good enough" and "with respect" are about one's position in the caste/hierarchy structure.

The reason I assume what the psychologist meant is that most of them are neurotypical, and neurotypical people are deeply invested in social primate dynamics. I understand that this is hard for neurotypical people to see, but you might read things like DeWaal's "Chimpanzee Politics" or Johnson's "Impro" [1]. Plus there's my personal experience, where psychologists are very inclined to talk about self-worth in the social sense. And I think that's fine; I'm sure it works well for their neurotypical patients.

[1] particularly the section on status transactions, which are vital for authentic theater performances, but are rarely articulated because it's so natural to neurotypical people
I mean, if they were unemployed, they wouldn't be mathematicians anymore
There are pockets here and there, even inside of AAA studios. But I agree, I'm unlikely to stay in games once I leave this job or am laid off.
So are sealions.
I just described two different ways of thinking about self-worth, so I am not suggesting it "can only be defined" as anything.
My partner considers my deliberateness as lazy. They won’t discuss things with me because they already know all about me.

My willingness to share their perception of me being ineffective was quite damaging to my self esteem. I never felt successful due to lack of acknowledgment of my achievements.

They asked me to leave the house about a year ago. Once I met new people and they saw me as successful and fun my self worth improved.
Actually, this is incorrect. Pen registers are generally considered fine because they are applied in a specific, limited manner, with minimal injury to the privacy of the populace. There are specific legal tests applied to surveillance technologies and the info they gather that exactly weigh the harm to the privacy of the public.

Carpenter v. United States I think is one of the landmark cases that has started to signal the impending curtailment of unabridged third-party doctrine. Kyllo v. U.S. laid some groundwork as well, I believe unless I've mixed it up with another case in which the court recognized it must balance the ever expanding capabilities granted to law enforcement by new technology against the right of the populace to maintain their expectations of privacy. In part, those tests have to take into account the impact of the particular means being employed. In the Kyllo case, a thermal imager being used to see through the walls of a structure without a warrant constituted an infringement of the 4th Amendment because accepting that law enforcement could do this would be to let law enforcement intrude through artifice where historically they would not have been allowed to tread without warrants. Applied to the entirety of the population, this would represent a wholesale nullification of the 4th Anendment by mere accident of now having a sensor exist that could make that previously private, public. Based on said analysis, your assertion talls short. It is in fact the goal of the Court to specifically not infer that just because something is authorized for use in a singular instance, does not mean it's character does not change when applied a billion times.

Courts are not computers. They are not stupid. They business of weighing nuance is sorta their thing, in spite of how annoying they can be at utterly torturing language when they want to do something a plain reading won't let them do.
you want to have a look at Operations Research[7]...im not an expert however, and could not possibly point you to the specific solution

[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operations_research
It doesnt have to be a shared moral compass, but simply your own. That is to say, you can practice integrity in isolation from other people.

A simple mundane example would being going to the gym if you tell yourself you will.

A more complex example would be acting in accordance with the values you believe in or not. If you think people that kick dogs are terrible, but you yourself go around kicking dogs, this creates a lot of cognitive dissonance and low self worth. If you promise yourself to stop, but keep breaking that promise, you realize you cant be trusted, which also impacts self worth.
I saw examples of both your and GP's experiences in my experience at a big4.

Unfortunately none I saw (sample size: a handful in detail and perhaps dozens to a skim) followed even basic statistical practices I had learned in undergraduate studies at a well-respected university.

There were clues that at least some of the parties involved knew better, but the imperative to publish completely overwhelmed any instinct for academic rigor.

It was dressed up as "eminence", which came after sold work and delivered work (in order) in annual reviews. Statistical rigor would probably help eminence, but there were faster paths to eminence.
I have a three year old M1 Max, 32gb RAM. Llama 8bn runs at 25 tokens/sec, that’s fast enough, and covers 80% of what I need. On my ryzen 5600h machine, I get about 10 tokens/second, which is slow enough to be annoying.

If I get stuck on a problem, switch to chat gpt or phind.com and see what that gives. Sometimes, it’s not the LLM that helps, but changing the context and rewriting the question.

However I cannot use the online providers for anything remotely sensitive, which is more often than you might think.

Local LLMs are the future, it’s like having your own private Google running locally.
Hugo as a static site generator and hosted on Netlify with a custom domain.
> I've successfully written Makefiles for Fortran and they worked with ifort/ifx and gfort.

Did the samé (I'm not sure if gfortran did exist at all at the time, I guess it had been g95), plus they worked with Absoft, PGI and Pathscale too (yes, that has been some time ago). And it was a great PITA. Not the least because at the time no Fortran compiler did generate the dependency description, so you either had to parse the Fortran sources by yourself or use makedepf90, which didn't work with all sources.

> You have failed to provide reasons as to why those languages in particular [...] can't be used with Makefiles.

I have obviously badly worded that. I didn't mean it is impossible, just that is a great PITA.

> I am not familiar with C++ modules and as such I didn't experiment with them.

They have the same problem, you don't know the name of the module that is going to be produced.
Preconditioning would only apply to approaches like interior point methods, where the condition number quickly approaches infinity.
It's still present in the llama license...?

https://ai.meta.com/llama/license/

Section 1.b.iv
I genuinely don't care. I've questioned downvotes I've received before, but usually it's just because I want to know why I might have had a bad take or how I might be looking at things wrong.

Respectfully, I know nobody here and you all mean nothing to my life, which is much broader than what I post here, so what do your judgements matter to me? What do these points actually mean that I should choose not to be myself because of them? The answer, to both, is nothing.
What's the difference between giving away a $1200 phone in exchange for a 2-year contract which costs $50 extra per month,

compared to a plan which costs $50 less per month, and a BNPL plan attached to the carrier which costs $50 per month?
Hardly, needs something more like this.

https://www.gasparini.com/en/the-worlds-largest-hydraulic-pr...
There should be an option in FSD to have it not pass on the right and to change what speed difference it will wait to pass for (for example only pass when the car in front is [5] mph slower than what I want to go). These are separate options to look into than chill mode, and could also fall short to Comma, but thought I’d share in case you didn’t know they were there.
>If you use the Llama Materials to create, train, fine tune, or otherwise improve an AI model, which is distributed or made available, you shall also include “Llama 3” at the beginning of any such AI model name.

The official llama 3 repo still says this, which is a different phrasing but effectively equal in meaning to what the commenter above said.
That actually makes a lot of sense merging with some comments from above.

Second stroke goes lower and there are some ports to add air which are not accessed during the initial compression stroke...so the stroke is longer (higher compression) and more air is added to help with the reburn.

Kinda sounds like combining the idea of the Miller cycle with a variable compression/stroke setup (see Nissan).

There are a lot of ideas out there that create gains individually...glad to see them being combined more and more in modern engines. (ex. VRIS, VVT, DFI,)
I personally think there is still another few decades of playing around with ICE to be done...not sure it will be viable for the market...but the research will lead to a lot more interesting engineering.
So your argument is that a cell carrier can't be profitable without entrapping poor people into long contracts with debt.

Therefore we must legally protect the rights of businesses to exploit people.
I think this is a big deal. In my opinion, many money making stable AI services are going to be deliberately of limited ability on limited domains. One doesn't want one's site help bot answering political questions. So this could really pull much of the revenue away from AI/LLMs as service.
In Germany, where Porsche is from, sales of EVs are on the decline. The same is true for other countries in Europe as well.

https://www.teslarati.com/electric-vehicle-eu-sales-drop/
Not only does it take up the entire wall, IIRC part of it was actually cut in order for it to fit that wall.
You can define it how you like, the nature of a NIMBY is that whatever it is, they don't want it near THEM (hence Not In My Back Yard) and affecting THEM, but they don't care about how it may affect others. If they were against whatever the thing is it wouldn't matter if it were their backyard or someone else's, they're only concerned with THEIR lives. When all you care about is you, you don't care about others and that's anti-progress.
Well literally any change removes money from some to give it to others. Side effect may be that people are better off (see Ozempic) but oh boy are the people losing money going to muddle the water / for investors as well as to fight the change.
If you want a really interesting version of the work, go to the Royal Delft factory. They made a reproduction in their famous blue tile. It's about the same size as the original.
The reward for those things is either more work for no increase in pay or you're in conflict with one or more people who are now bad mouthing you to the boss and you'll eventually be fired or be made so miserable that you'll voluntarily leave.
I take comfort in seeing my experience described by others. I’m waiting on a neurological evaluation to see where on a spectrum I exist. I have been evaluated for a personality disorder of which none was found.
Love all the work going into passkey syncing, just need Google, Apple, and Microsoft to work together on enabling sync between ecosystems at the platform level (for both daily driving across platforms and vaulting).
This primarily exists to take care of a fundamental issue in Docker Swarm (Kamal's orchestrator of choice) where replacing containers of a service disrupts traffic. We had the same problem (when building JAMStack servers at Cloud 66) and used Caddy instead of writing our own proxy and also looked at Traefik which would have been just as suitable.

I don't know why Kamal chose Swarm over k8s or k3s (simplicity perhaps?) but then, complexity needs a home, you can push it around but cannot hide it, hence a home grown proxy.

I have not tried Kamal proxy to know, but I am highly skeptical of something like this, because I am pretty sure I will be chasing it for support for anything from WebSockets to SSE, to HTTP/3 to various types of compression and encryption.
What's your point? Future or now, my point about vanity remains. I don't see any point in arguing over my use of the word "future" here.

Again, "faster" isn't the most important metric for car enthusiasts. Which is what I described in my post. I know that's disappointing to people who would like it to be in order to claim total justification for electric motors.

To say that "sports cars are fully adopting electrification" seems to want to imply that sports cars are moving mostly to full electrification. This isn't remotely true. Their customer base wouldn't stand for it.
Neurodiversity Symbol
If I remember right, in the press conference they suggested desktop users would use a gpu because desktop uses are less power sensitive. That doesn’t address the vram limitations of discrete GPUs though.
Not the parent, but I started using Llama 3.1 8b and it's very good.

I'd say it's as good as or better than GPT 3.5 based on my usage. Some benchmarks: https://ai.meta.com/blog/meta-llama-3-1/

Looking forward to try other models like Qwen and Phi in near future.
Show HN: Extractous, Rust based data extraction ~25x faster than unstructured-io
Docs and Scripts Around "A Reasonably Safe Travel Burner Laptop" (2013)
that point is completely bogus since hardware oscillators limit the range. and even multi range devices let the driver decide the region, so even with closed source you can already offend fcc regulations (pro tip set your wifi region to cuba for extra channels)
>If this was the case at all, a great treatment for low self esteem would be to commit to stuff for others, since that'd automatically make you valuate your own self more

How do you know this is not true?

If your sense of obligation is seen as a value function for people, it follows that your self-worth is the value when you plug-in "self". Helping others and volunteering is indeed something that brings satisfaction and could help heal your sense of self-worth. If you value another person higher than yourself, by helping them you would establish a connection between their worth and your own. You potentially went from lacking any evidence of positive self-worth to having concrete first-hand evidence that you are worth something to someone.
- "2 MacBooks is all you need. Llama 3.1 405B running distributed across 2 MacBooks using @exolabs_ home AI cluster" https://x.com/AIatMeta/status/1834633042339741961

- "Running Qwen 2.5 Math 72B distributed across 2 MacBooks. Uses @exolabs_ with the MLX backend." https://x.com/ac_crypto/status/1836558930585034961
You missed the distinction between "I don't feel I have any worth" and "I don't see the world in terms of quantifying worth."
This is a health/readiness probe in k8s. It's already solved quite solidly.
More relevant than discussions on digital sovereignty, Telegram is renowned for being founded, owned and operated by a Russian oligarch with ties to Russia's regime, and it is presumed to be controlled by it as well.
Think this is short term. Again no expert just based on what I see. Solid batteries give it few years then the maths will be very different
Very nice to see this point being made.

One way I explain it to people: Imagine a corporation that only has a PR department. Extremely good at generating press releases and answering reporter questions. But without the rest of the company, the output text isn't constrained by anything meaningful.

In an alternate universe, one where people understood this, people would be using LLMs for nothing serious, but a whole lot of fun little art projects.
In August. After a 38% tariff.
Llama 3.1 405B

"2 MacBooks is all you need. Llama 3.1 405B running distributed across 2 MacBooks using @exolabs_ home AI cluster" https://x.com/AIatMeta/status/1834633042339741961
Some Thoughts on the OODA Spiral
Your confusion isn't mine to solve but fortunately more ink has been spilled already, by folks more capable than I, for just that: https://bcantrill.dtrace.org/2018/12/14/open-source-confront...
No, they don't. They work just like Temporal and the others, which send the durable state to a separate store. I totally understand that this is good for the tool business model, since many users will end up paying for the separate store, instead of keeping it in the same DB where the application already is, without needing to pay extra for it. After all, the amount of data for keeping that state should be relativly small, so no one would provision a separate DB for it if the SDK didn't force them to.
I think they explicitly said the opposite. That the writing is their reward, and comments are always visible to the author. Visibility to other humans is incidental, or at least a secondary concern.
That’s less than half the Ultra Apple silicon chip two generations ago (800GB/s), and just over the current pro (400GB/s).
This is the best take on the generative AI fad I've yet seen. I wish I could upvote this twice.
you managed to completely miss the point.

going the pc route is fully embracing your hardware accept whatever software the user wants. not throw unbuildable source somewhere and make it impossible to use. that's the faux open source we have today when someone must comply with the gpl or something
schools imprison kids now? really?
I rented a Polestar yesterday and loved it. Granted, never driven an EV before.
That's the number one way of getting mad LLM disease. Feeding LLMs to LLMs.
I haven’t read the article yet but I’m hoping to read one that attempts to elucidate a possible connection between the plummeting of self-worth of women (and the whiplash effect of their behaviour thereafter) and their exposure to social media that shows them every day, and I’ll put this in a shrewd way, the lives of other women that they will never have. A non-stop daily mental torture session for a good deal of the human race. I want to read such an article because I want someone, and someone with writing flair at that, to go for the jugular of the sick and twisted human nature that we pretend does not exist.