skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Come on, this is a ridiculous point and makes no sense.
No, it's true. On-device actions count in the eyes of the law. "This app processes the user's data on-device, does not allow other apps to access the data, and optionally copies it to a server that the user provides" is a description.
China's Alibaba launches over 100 new open-source AI models
There's literally a dedicated major called History of Science. They teach fundamentally different things for different reasons.
SSDs are 3D with high stacking. They retain data without burning power, unlike SRAM.

What if you put some of these 3D transistors tightly integrated with a 3D SSD and power gated them?

It seems like you would beat the memory wall.

Obviously manufacturing that is beyond us today.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banyan_trees_in_Indi...
Shameless self-plug of my own expression language supporting multiple types: https://github.com/AlexErrant/Pentive/blob/main/shared-dom/s...

It's a Lezer grammar using the Github search syntax style. Currently undocumented, but the autocomplete/syntax highlighting (thanks to Lezer) is pretty good. It can handle search strings like this:

created<2024-09-24 foo -bar spider-man "wildcard*" ```literal"'`quotes``` (a b "quoted string") (c OR d OR `lit'eral`) -(x y OR z) (tag:mytag,'your tag') state:normal (arbitrary (nesting (edited<2024-09-23 OR created=2024-09-17))) /regex/si due=true tagCount=0 field:"user input field name":/lol regex/ui
When you already need an adapter you might as well use the usb-c connector.
I too missed Iosevka, I got Nanum Gothic Coding with no font names. I would like this site (or a docker container) to be more like "give it a list of fonts and it randomizes the pair-ups each time"
Poisoning AI Scrapers
So a full planet OSM extract is about 300 million binary files, in total about 90 GB. The most popular ways to store it:

- MBTiles - an SQLite file, each file is a row in a table, you need a server to serve it.

- PMTiles - a single file, optimised for serverless usage.

- Extract them into a directory, which in practice should be on a partition image. This is the approach I choose.

I tested ext4 and Btrfs and I choose Btrfs. The reason is how ext4 and Btrfs handles inodes. Btrfs handles inodes so much better compared to ext4, it doesn't allocate them at start and also allows putting tiny files right with the metadata.

Because here the average tile size is only 405 bytes, most of the tiles can actually stored with the Btrfs metadata block. From the latest run:

Btrfs data is 51.57GiB

Btrfs metadata is 84.37GiB
Agreed.

When every implementation in wide use has their own quirks, you must support them all to make your program widely used. Every special case is yet another potential bug to chase down.

It also allows "Embrace, extend, and extinguish" -strategy that Microsoft used so successfully to assfuck the internet over a decade.
..in mice
Interesting to know. These were so commonplace but it's been a while since I've seen one. I was struck by the design while reading the article. I almost want one, but I so rarely use scotch tape...
I suspect this is in no small part because many people here’s livelihoods are dependent or intertwined with said Corps, whether directly or indirectly. It’s very difficult to separate that innate bias.

I don’t agree with the gp comment’s sentiment though, plenty of people here and elsewhere go hard to bat for google, although admittedly lately that’s increasingly difficult to do with a straight face.
So it runs everything locally/in web worker, but there's a monthly quota and it requires a paid plan of $9.99 monthly to keep running it on my own machine?
Yes, of course. You can use it at https://json4u.com.
> They've already removed themselves from society

Larry Ellison in particular literally owns 98% of one of the Hawaiian islands.
Works from an EU IP, so whatever it is, it's probably not GDPR?
Apple previously published extensive Human Interface Design guidelines that were too-notch. For a generation of computing they really raised the bar on usability and improved experience. (Recently all of computer usability has gone far downhill, IMHO, especially starting with all the flat interfaces, and the penchant for mystery meat icons everywhere, but I digress from my main point...)

If Apple is going to have strict usability requirements on the clarity of the permissions requests, that has the potential to be a good thing. But that requires establishing guidelines, and publishing them, and being clear about what in the prompt does not meet the guidelines.
For donor phone, they probably kept 1TB NAND intact but CNCed away the rest of phone
I absolutely love this project and had a similar idea on my todo list for a while because I agree there should be at least one free open map provider with a developer friendly stack.

If you want free servers/bandwidth around the world, hit me up. My email is in my profile.
Not really, it’s the home page of the online editor. Was it my use of "Get Started" that confused you? I might have used it inappropriately, I'm not sure.
"Postel" is not a term that carries any significance for me, and Googling that word didn't turn anything up that seemed relevant.

Who or what is a Postel?
If it weren't, then you'd need servers and it couldn't be serverless! :)
Already uses React, so might be able to rip some of the components out
You're right, they're not reviewing the app, they're reviewing the rationale for access! Separation was the point of my suggestion. It is probably not even true in the first place - it was only a conjecture. But if they did do that, it would have ups and downs. I could see a rationale that intentionally separating certain review duties from the context of the app could actually help to enforce objectivity. I tend to agree that it would probably be more bad than good, though.
> I'd rather not have every post about some game I like devolve into a culture war.

Then you should probably stop using X altogether.
I wonder if it’s https://justine.lol/ape.html / cosmopolitan libc
>that laws and theories are presented as just something that you need to memorize

That's part of a larger problem in how science is presented. It is presented as something that is true, when it isn't. It is a model that describes reality. The models you are learning in high school and entry undergrad classes are mostly wrong models whose main use is that they are great building blocks to more complex models, as they work well enough in ideal conditions and correlate well enough with our exist. Yet even the best, most up to date models, aren't right. They work well enough in the places they are used that we can bet human lives on them, but that doesn't mean they describe what the universe is actually doing. Unless someone finds a way to crack open up the universe and check the "source code", we will never know exactly what the universe is doing and are limited to only ever improving models that approach the truth, like a sum that converges on a value at infinity but never equals that value for any finite sum of the series.
How many do you have to have before you can start using the Force?
The algorithm prefers rectangular rooms, you'd just need to adjust it a bit. The wall loss function minimizes wall length and tries to regularize angles, so it naturally converges to square-ish rooms:

> we compute the norm of the tangent edge vector, which is equivalent to the norm of the 2D normal direction. Minimizing this loss has the following two effects: simplifying the wall between two adjacent rooms by penalizing its length, and aligning the boundary to the coordinate axis by making the coordinates of the tangent vector sparse in 2D.

The optimizer also seems like it should handle corridors okay as long as the corridor area is set to something reasonable. A corridor is just a room that is allowed to be long; since the other rooms will try to take up relatively square spaces you should be left with a long connecting area.

> And storage spaces have to be sized appropriately to their intended purpose: you don't want three-foot-deep shelves.

Like you said, this is the same minimum/maximum width problem that makes corridors wonky. I think this is relatively easily solved, though. A "minimum width" constraint is really just a requirement that no voronoi site is within X distance of a wall. A shelf is a sub-area in a room where there must be 2 borders within X distance of a voronoi point. Things like furniture and kitchen islands are also basically represented like that, as constrained areas.

A simpler alternative to complex per-point constraints would be to have area constraints per control point- a bunch of single-point "rooms" inside the actual rooms. In the case of a corridor, since the voronoi cells tend towards a square, you just need to set that area to the minimum width and they should avoid shrinking below that width.
It's a reference to "Postel's law" which is a pretty well-known principle in the networking world, and in software more broadly. Named after Jon Postel, who edited and published many of the RFCs describing core Internet protocols.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_principle
I don't think it's still offered anywhere in the web interface, but Hetzner offers servers with 10Gbit uplink, with traffic charged at 1€/TB. Depending on resource usage this can be more cost effective than renting multiple servers, and paying for your traffic should prevent account termination for excessive traffic use.

https://docs.hetzner.com/robot/dedicated-server/network/10g-...
Yes, but you can also deploy it locally, so you can use it for free. May I ask, do you think that programs running locally are not worth paying for if it is open source?
Why would a moon telescope be desirable over a satellite telescope?
That's not very readable and way too many words. Reads like a marketing copy. The purpose of the sentence isn't apparent; a person who struggles with English could be confused what advanced controls or pro photography even have to do with camera permissions.

The reality of the situation is that the camera app needs camera permissions because it's a camera app. It's for taking photos, you know.
Besides the economic factors I think a big part is also people growing up with online influencers who are all about the hustle.
Did you read the PDF? WP Engine answers this - quote below. They employed (or used to employ) WordPress core contributors and have spent lots of money in the community. It's not 'Matt's Product' but an open source code base supported by a large community.

=== Quote ===

Contrary to Mr. Mullenweg’s statements that WP Engine does not contribute to his
narrow and self-serving definition of the WordPress community, WP Engine has
been deeply dedicated to advancing the use and adoption of WordPress through
innovation, investment, and active community involvement. WP Engine has
contributed tens of millions of dollars in ongoing support for the broader
community through events, sponsorships, and the development of educational
resources, including sponsorship of WordCamps worldwide and producing
DE{CODE}; educating and empowering the WordPress community through
content like the WordPress Roundup and the Building WordPress series; hosting,
funding and actively maintaining multiple Open Source projects (e.g., ACF,
WPGraphQL, faust.js) within the ecosystem used by millions of websites around
the world; and producing informative webinars, podcasts, and tutorials. Even
considering Mr. Mullenweg’s incorrect statement that contribution is only based on
hours worked and contributors to Five for the Future, Mr. Mullenweg falsely stated
that WP Engine is failing on this metric. In reality, WP Engine is ranked 30 out of
189 in hours contributed and 16 out of 189 in contributors, significantly outpacing
multiple other contributors relative to our revenue.

=== End Quote ===

Blackmail is not okay - even if what he argues is true. He could have just done his presentation as he wanted and, as long as his claims are actually true, he wouldn't have had any trouble. Instead he tried to Blackmail a company into giving his FOR PROFIT COMPANY money. This wasn't about supporting WordPress, this was about rent seeking for his own organization.
With however many hundreds of thousands (or millions?) of apps in the store, the reason for why is quite obvious. Apple doesn’t need to have AI models that try to figure out what permissions an app would need. Nor do they need to hire people to do that manually.

Instead, they can make app developers fulfill whatever criteria they want. It’s their platform after all.
Thanks a lot for the offer, I'll definitely reach out!
That was a neat idea back in the day but should disallowed now.
Running downloaded executables considered harmful.
That's not how fluids work. The molecules spread out to form an even surface everywhere, so you can't have local high spots. You'd have to put in enough oil to cover the entire surface, and then put in more.
And I suppose CPA exists to help understand tax laws, and there is always a possibility to sue the government if you don't agree with them on how the law works.

Whereas with app store reviews, it's a black box with no option other than trial and error to figure out what to do.
Are you sure? Why would he need to reinstall the OS then?
Looks like Unity Linux runs the Deepin desktop based on the screenshots - https://www.deepin.org/index/en
C++ renderer based on glTF to Metal back end
Princeton AI agent improves SOTA by 3.3x on offensive cybersecurity challenges
Our open source AI agent EnIGMA uses tools like Ghidra & pwntools, can debug, connect to servers, and exploit vulnerabilities to solve CTF challenges.
Built with folks from Princeton, NYU, and TAU.

https://github.com/princeton-nlp/SWE-agent/
https://enigma-agent.github.io/
FTA: "Unlike telescopes such as the Hubble and the James Webb, which are made from mirrors and lenses, FarView would comprise a hundred thousand metal antennas made on-site by autonomous robots. It would cover a Baltimore-size swath of the moon."

They want to build a radio telescope, not a simple optical telescope.
Postel’s Law: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc761#section-2.10
> "Maybe what ails us is not our freedom per se, but something we mistake for freedom—being detached from family obligations"

> "College, medical school, law school, and the like (...) just eat up childbearing years"

> "Pakaluk seems to wish she could sit down with all the ambitious young women at top colleges and dissuade them from what she and her subjects see as a devastating lie"

TLDR: freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength.
Mpox may trigger large outbreak in one of Africa's biggest cities
It doesn't sound profound at all?
It's a reference to Jon Postel who wrote the following in RFC 761[0]:

TCP implementations should follow a general principle of robustness:
be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from
others.

Postel's Law is also known as the Robustness principle. [1]

[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc761#section-2.10

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_principle
Because it's an environment variable, and thus will have an (often undesired) effect on child processes. This information should instead be encoded into the binaries and libraries themselves, with things like DT_RUNPATH and DT_RPATH.
What I am talking about is more dynamic, although meta-objects could be made more static too.

Particularly, I am not a Musician now but if I learned to play an instrument or performed at a concert I could become a Musician. This could be implemented as

paulHoule.isA(Musician.class) # false
paulHoule.as(Musician.class).playsInstruments() # an empty Set<Instrument>
paulHoule.as(Musician.class).playsInstruments().add(trumpet)
paulHoule.isA(Musician.class) # now true

I really did build a very meta object facility that represented objects from this system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta-Object_Facility

in an RDF graph and provided an API in Python that made those objects look mostly Pythonic. Inheritance in MOF is like Java so I didn't need to use any tricks to make dynamic classes (possible in RDF) available.
I would be really excited to see an open source project with a non-trivial amount of Bash script say, "OK, we're switching to OSH." OSH is almost 100% compatible with Bash, so this wouldn't really require that much work -- but it would be a vote of confidence in the project.

I understand that projects might not want to do that until OSH reaches 1.0, though.
> The camera will be used to take photographs

Isn't providing functionality provided by existing iOS apps still a reason for rejection?

The description should at least say "for taking photos with advanced customisation suitable for professionals"
X-ray pulses could stop asteroids from hitting Earth
It's like that on Google Pixel phones too. Even if you enable the 120 Hz refresh rate, it'll only each that in certain situations and be lower most of the time. Seems like a good tradeoff for increased battery life.
Postel’s Law, also known as the Robustness Principle:

> be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others

It’s intended as a way to maximise compatibility, and people have generally followed it when designing protocols and file formats. However it’s led to many security vulnerabilities and has caused a lot of compatibility problems itself. These days a lot of people are realising that it’s more harmful than helpful.
I guess it doesn't matter if this is human or bot, an advert's an advert.
Evan is one of the most stand up guys I met in my life. Always thinking for the group rather than himself.
Why do you care if someone has Windows?
If it is to support a human I would tend to agree, but for desks etc. I have found local supplies (Canada) have declined in quality to such a degree they need the level of QA on arrival the Chinese ones do while costing 5-10x as much.
Loved Chocks Away!

+ Nevryon (rip off of R-Type)
> by lowering the area of each die, you increase the yield of each in the stack.

Nope. The yield is relative to the surface area in layers, not the die surface area.
One thing not mentioned in the article is the use of pesticide. Were the peels organic, or do the pesticides naturally degrade in a harmless way?
Earth seems a much hairier environment. Air means weather, water is notoriously corrosive, and random wildlife and microorganisms are hair squared. And initially nobody's going to care about preserving the wilderness. It is true we mostly don't have to worry about meteors and hard radiation, and the local temperature range is smaller.

There were some design studies of lunar resources and their extraction in the 70s, iirc using solar furnaces. I think I read about this in https://space.nss.org/colonies-in-space-by-t-a-heppenheimer/ almost that long ago.

The novelty and distance are a challenge but maybe less of one than the problems for autonomy on Earth?
A reference to Postel's Law: be conservative in what you produce and liberal in what you accept.

The law references that you should strive to follow all standards in your own output, but you should make a best effort to accept content that may break a standard.

This is useful in the context of open standards and evolving ecosystems since it allows peers speaking different versions of a protocol to continue to communicate.

The assertion being made here is that the world has become too fraught with exploiting this attitude for it to continue being a useful rule
yes, it's only fully managed at this time. However, oodle is very cost-efficient, it's cheaper than your self-hosted infra costs. https://oodle.ai/usecases/self-hosted
“AI” or outsourced low budget review staff.
From the FAQs on GitHub [1]

> What about PMTiles?

> I would have loved to use PMTiles; they are a brilliant idea!

> Unfortunately, making range requests in 80 GB files just doesn't work in production. It is fine for files smaller than 500 MB, but it has terrible latency and caching issues for full planet datasets.

> If PMTiles implements splitting to <10 MB files, it can be a valid alternative to running servers.

[1] https://github.com/hyperknot/openfreemap
If you just look at the plans in the initial diagram. Plan C is the only one that makes marginally useful spaces, avoiding excesive corners and awkward leftover space that ends up without use. It also happens to be the more obvious solution to the problem.

I could see the value in generating a bunch of rooms roughly accounting for the space requirements, but that's usually done in a more abstract way before taking into consideration things like privacy, thoroughfares, building conventions, spans, noise and light access, wind patterns, and things of that nature.
Exactly my thought. They're hand waving all complex manufacturing to 3D printers. This will be a hard plastic gear for the foreseeable future.
At a high level, FC lost the write without responding to the write in a timely fashion while other I/Os went through. The write request never gets through from the host to the target, and the host ends up timing out the write then throws an I/O error => that seems like a lost write to me at a higher level. Lossless only applies at the lowest layer of the stack; any holistic view of the system would view this scenario as lossy.

I have implemented ARP and UDP on FPGAs for some toy projects, and it's really not that difficult. One of the use-cases I played around with was getting debug data out of an FPGA at multigigabit rates -- things like PCIe TLPs and raw SERDES data from an EPON implementation to debug a burst mode CDR. The fact that the protocol was IPv4/UDP was no impediment to having it push data through at line rate. Once you've implemented parallel CRC32 for ethernet packets from scratch on a 256-512 bit wide data bus where packets can start and end on arbitrary 32 bit boundaries, the complexity of IPv4 and UDP checksums is dead simple in comparison.

I understand and agree with throwing out TCP in TTPoE. I do not agree with throwing out IPv4 / IPv6. Heck, you don't even need ARP for v6, you could get away with link local addresses using the ethernet MAC address you already need to have anyways.
Yeah, I too missed Comic Mono
Early spec of TCP had a section on the robustness principle that was generally known as Postel's law (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc761#section-2.10). At the time and until recently this was considered good design. Nowadays people generally want servers to be stricter in what they accept since decades of experience dealing with diverging interpretations of a specification create problems for interoperability.
This is a strange narrative to me. Google and other companies have done crappy things without people calling for a break up of the company. It’s possible you are in your reality distortion field. An anti-Apple one.

I don’t know anything about this particular case but there is a gray area when it comes to what an owner of a platform should/shouldn’t be allowed to do. I hope the EU cracks down hard on both Apple and Google. Both of these platforms have become essential to modern life in many ways and as such a case can be made for strict government oversight of them.
Panels: A new mobile app by MKBHD
It was a bug meteor from the asteroid ring around Klendathu.
Beautiful-username-generator: Node.js lib to generate usernames
Some of the pixel art in those screenshots is seriously awesome!
The blood microbiome is probably not real