skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Also Sam Bankman-Fried, but same caveat applies.
Tech Boeing
Automatically generating Cloudflare's Terraform provider
I'm curious, why did you move off of grafana?

For the same reasons op listed or for other reasons?
Do you pay for it? Who do you pay? How much profit do they make from your payment? Is it more than the cost to them?
Nice feat!

I wonder if a rewrite of this in C++ would even bump further the performance and optimise the overall system.
> Thanks, “head of stock research”. Definitely a real job that’s not at all made up. I’m sure he did a lot of chin stroking and graph glancing to come to this technical decision! Someone should let all the scientists know that they’re wrong, and intuitive algorithms are “not needed”…

Why would you think "head of stock research" is a made up job? It is obvious that investors need to research the stocks the companies they invest in to figure out if they're good investments.

> Someone should let all the scientists know that they’re wrong, and intuitive algorithms are “not needed”…

It's your problem if you confuse "people trying to hype their AI products" with "scientists" and "not providing the hyped value" with "not needed."
Says who?

Also wouldn't this idea just be moving data before it's fully processed? Why wouldn't the intermediate data be bigger?

Also "a lot" isn't a number and what are you comparing it to?
Wasting metal instead of time is the difference between Dragon and Starliner.

I will listen to the guy who's actually getting things done, thanks.
It's not likely to be much cheaper but there is probably a plumbing distributor near you with a much wider selection.
When progress decouples from investment is when I'd say there is a true bubble. But so far progress has continued to soar.

Nobody thinks GPT4-o1 or Sonnet 3.5 is going to change the world. People are looking at the past 2-3 years though and extrapolating forward, and right now they don't see any evidence that progress will slow down. Quite the opposite actually.

As for where that value will manifest itself the most in the stock market? That's probably where this guy is getting hung up.
>but is hamstrung by a common lizard brain reaction we all have. One of those things people don't like, or feels icky, and they have no idea why they feel that way.

You clearly missed all the discourse about MAID in Canada, where people accused the government/medical care system of pushing people into committing suicide so they'd be less of a burden on the medical system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia_in_Canada#Criticism
There's been a couple articles about finishing projects posted in the last couple weeks[0][1] and in addition to this topic being incredibly interesting, it also seems pretty pervasive in the community.

A lot of people, myself included, tend to work well with external stimuli, e.g., other people. Especially when there aren't users of the product, there's no one you're really accountable for except yourself. When you start to have users, of course, that becomes different.

So, the question really becomes: how can I bake in accountability in the early stages of my project to see it through and finish?

My answer has been to build around others. A group of us meet weekly over the course of a 6-week period to chat about our project, progress, etc. with a "demo day" at the end where we're expected to show the final thing.[2] It's honestly really fun and we're about to start our third "cohort".

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41428705

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41293219

[2] https://lmt2.com
Ok, but this is the worst example of permission overreach, as it's an app to take photos, obviously it needs access to the camera.
FTL travel. Alternatively, just displace the universe into a larger, younger universe. Easy peasy lemon squeezy ;p
> Einstein and Planck just solved stuff,

Their ideas, solutions, and problems didn't come about from magic.
Yes. Live in one of those areas and "radon mitigation systems" are common. There is a sealed lid that goes over your sump pump cover, and a fan constantly pulls air from it, which goes up a tube on the side of your house and empties near the roofline.
I love Apple products, and use their phones and computers.

I absolutely agree that my phone should be allowed to run whatever code I want without their having approved it.

Is the argument now better for having come from a different person, or am I misremembering what an ad hominem attack is?
I'm curious how they expect people to contribute to the project. Section 4 of the license says "Contribution to Project: You are encouraged to contribute improvements, enhancements, and bug fixes back to the project. Contributions must be submitted to the official repository and will be reviewed and incorporated at the discretion of the maintainers." However, the restrictions in Section 5 ban forking the code or distributing modified versions. This means that the standard Github "fork the repo, make your changes in a branch, and send a pull request" workflow for submitting changes would violate the license.
I'm not seeing that colour combination -- are you sure you don't have Dark Reader or some such add-on enabled..?
> after consuming self-help content, is how people fail to realize that we're all unique individuals

Where the people who fail to realize that are mostly self-help authors, you mean?
It's too bad the petrochemical industry runs everything, eh?
touch -- '-f ..'

(If you want to lay an evil trap)

Remember that in most option parsing libraries, putting '--' in your arguments stops option parsing, so you can safely run:

rm -- '-f ..'
Hmm. Another logo change so soon after the 2017 one? That's a pretty visible sign of Mozilla's distress. At least the new one isn't really any worse than the moz://a one.
Easier to build it where the materials are than try to launch a city-sized radio telescope.
Eh, here we go again, there's yet-another custom license, "Winamp Collaborative License (WCL) Version 1.0". Quick skim:

> No Distribution of Modified Versions: You may not distribute modified versions of the software, whether in source or binary form.

> No Forking: You may not create, maintain, or distribute a forked version of the software.

It's basically "look but do not touch". I don't see why this was necessary for something that's basically abandonware by now, and is mostly of historical interest.
this seems like a fantastic way to look back on a career where the author started as a prolific solo developer and later became an effective, fast, and contributing part of an effective development team. it was also just really fun to read, about the code reuse, the scrapping of ideas, the rewrites, etc.
An idea: if oil forms a two dimensional shape, ie a single layer of molecules, then adding 2x amount of oil would give you twice the area. If it is three dimensional, say oil makes a bubble, then it would look smaller.

Of course this also fails if the oil formed a disc of X layers of molecules
Maybe it’s just me and my old IPhone 12 Mini, but I really find it annoying when browsing to something called Coding Font to immediately face a popup with no “close” button that shows me a big unrelated ad at the same time as promoting an app I have no reason to believe I might even want to look at. What’s even more annoying is then having to only discover that it’s the greyed out (seemingly inactive) top margin that will close the damn thing, rather than pop open the ad’s link, an auto playing YouTube video, or whatever the help ProductHunt is used for.

Before seeing the actual content I’m presented 3 ways to bounce to another domain, and no obvious way to actually see the content.

Oh, and it’s back on every refresh.
There's an argument here that the previous blocking behavior might give users a false sense of security. In reality, you should not post any information publicly that you wouldn't want someone in particular to read, even if you've blocked that person.
Amazon DynamoDB: Evolution of a Hyperscale Cloud Database Service (2022)
> Nobody thinks GPT4-o1 or Sonnet 3.5 is going to change the world

They already have, people don't realize it because expectations have shifted so much because of how transformative it already is.

I'm in a few communities that like to read novels from China / Korea. Claude Sonnet translates Mandarin to English almost perfectly.

I also copy and paste screenshots of Mandarin into it and it transcribes it perfectly too.

A universal language translator of this quality on its own would have been a billion dollar company a year before LLMs were released.
There are entire product lines of android devices out there which ship with different default stores.

Think of Amazon or chinese huawei devices, even samsung ships it's own app store. Google's App Store is not that dominant.
I disagree. The permission should be allowed/denied by the end user. There's no reason why a third party has to have say in that.
This is totally customizable and the house numbers are already present in the original data, it's just not displayed in the default styles. You can customize the style by using the Maputnik editor, house numbers are visible in the "Inspector" view.
https://maputnik.github.io/editor?style=https://tiles.openfr...
Why does Wall Street never ring alarm against Wall Street?
I hope a bunch of wealthy investors lose their shirts on AI "investments". No bailouts for them.
how hard is it to say "This is a camera app. Therefore it needs camera permissions in order to take photographs".
Fortunately, the tendencies for neatness and build quality reinforce each other.

(Sadly, Sir Ive's obsession with thinness and minimalism did not mesh with actual ergonomics equally well.)
I think the better example is the all-too-common: “Installation: Just run `curl -sL http://goo.gl/hsjdiNgtehsn | sudo bash`”
> It used to be very common for every program you installed to dump several libraries in that directory.

Maybe back on Windows 95? Hasn’t been the case or an issue in as long as I can remember.

> It's called "DLL Hell" for a reason.

Linux shared library hell is at least a full order of magnitude more complex, fragile, and error prone. Launching a Linux program is so outrageously unreliable that everyone uses Docker just to run a bloody program! It’s so so bad. At least in the year two thousand and twenty four.
Looks like a bug in their light theme - it's using the dark theme's background. There's a theme toggle top-left to switch to the still-functioning dark theme.

Guessing they probably started with a light theme then retrofitted a dark theme & rolled it out without realising it would regress the existing light theme.
If you cant sufficiently explain why your app needs the permissions it does thats on you and the submitter needs to take accountability here. Resubmit with a better explanation.

I get that the app store is strict. But its strict for a reason. Apple or the app store isn't out to get your app or you.
Godard famously used these services recently
They ought to make this thing a 2-seater so a loved one with an oxygen mask can sit next to you and hold your hand.
This really whips the llama's ass
This is one thing I keep running into. Every body is different. I really wish there were some diagnostic we could run that would tell us what diet to use rather than constantly having to try a hundred different things.
I never even set up a default context. I sussed out that problem from the get-go and always use `--context`. But that's not really enough if you use shell history, or if your clusters differ in few letters that are easy to typo.
Mesa: 1% Cash Back on Mortgages
Well, knowing how to deal with wacky input and corner cases are a requirement of learning ANY programming language. Bourne-style shells are no exception.

Your example has illegal syntax, but the biggest issue is that you should never parse the output of ls. The shell has built-in globbing. This is how you would loop over all entries (files, dirs, symlinks, etc) in the current directory without getting tripped up by whitespace:

for e in *; do echo "got: $e"; done
There will always be a weakest link. At some point you just gotta be an adult and not build things to within an inch of their lives for the use they will see and then have the self control to not push the limit. Resources are limited and engineering tradeoffs are everywhere. These discussions always devolve into absurdity very quickly.
I'm a simple man. I see Aaron Francis, I upvote.
>No one knows anything about the physical or chemical properties of sand on the beach. No one asks; no one cares.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22026436
It’s easier to deploy in the weightless environment of orbit than on the moon with gravity. Consistent with this, the largest off-Earth structure ever built (the ISS) is in orbit, not on a heavenly body.
It is ridiculous right? Which is why the fact that Apple is rejecting the app is also ridiculous.
> [...] there are use cases where dynamic linking is actually usefull, and achieving the same via OS IPC is too resource demanding.

Exactly my point with Mesa, it would be a huge mess to try to statically link it into your game, and it gets even funnier with each newly released GPU / driver update.
What do you have against the name "Larry"? [rimshot]

Seriously though. This is consistent with Oracle's history: their first customer, the organization for which they created their first product, was the CIA, and they've remained tight with the military-industrial complex to this day.
any plans to open source? I feel very comfortable using neon.tech (separates compute from storage for postgres) b/c they open source their stack but it would be hard for me to adopt something like oodle without an open source version.
not really, you can't euthanise (kill) someone but you can help them die, which the article points out - i.e. you can give someone a method to kill themselves with but you can't administer it to them

> Swiss law allows assisted suicide so long as the person takes his or her life with no “external assistance”
>Previous studies have shown that cancer cells can use nanotubes like “tiny tentacles” to slurp up mitochondria from immune cells.

Biology is nuts.

Regarding messing with T-cells I wonder how evolution came up with the current number of mitochondria per cell. Usually with these things there's some kind of push and pull between the benefits of something and the drawbacks. Or sometimes it's just whatever works. I know mitochondria can have some negative impacts on cells sometimes by releasing the byproducts of metabolism (reactive oxygen species) or triggering programmed cell death.
This farm bot is so neat, very interesting. It has my pondering if I should get one since I just moved out into the country.

I suppose I should first just get a planter and do some regular growing first and then I'll be better positioned and understand its benefits.
Arrests after Sarco 'suicide pod' used in Switzerland
Seconding this. I am also looking for an out-of-the-box component as such. The standard react-json-view is too limited.

The other opensource json visualizer I found operates on the similar model as OP's project, but it also doesn't provide a standalone component.

https://github.com/AykutSarac/jsoncrack.com
Why should i compile or jailbreak. Its my own device, why not have a toggle to allow sideloading like android.

Your average user won't know or even bother to change since as you mentioned they don't want to run unwanted code. Rest of us can run anything on our devices.
For what it is worth in the rf world (and probably the whole “physical layer” space) you want to avoid a DC bias on your line. Otherwise you are gonna be pulling a current in one direction.

To do this you want to make sure that the flow of electrons alternates roughly 50% of the time. You can accomplish this with all kinds of “data whitening” schemes like the one the parent describes.
Open sourcing is always good, because maybe you can learn some things by reading it. Also, Winamp Legacy is a fairly important piece of software, so having an archive of its source is a great thing.

But the restrictions on the source are interesting. To quote the license file:

* No Distribution of Modified Versions: You may not distribute modified versions of the software, whether in source or binary form.
* No Forking: You may not create, maintain, or distribute a forked version of the software.
* Official Distribution: Only the maintainers of the official repository are allowed to distribute the software and its modifications.

I'm guessing the "No Forking" clause means I can't release my own media player based on this source code, but the language is curious because they explicitly welcome contributions and for a project hosted on Github the standard way to do that is to "fork" the project into your own account.
The upper limit of heat extraction is an interesting problem. Intel certainly seems to have bumped into a region with the i7-12900k and later where the chip is heat limited under all load tests even on watercooling, and improving significantly on the best air-coolers requires taking off the protective 'heatspreader' for closer contact with a heatpipe. Those heatpipes seem to be mostly watercooled.

Some kind of supercritical CO2 heatspreader with direct die fluid contact perhaps?
Can you explain in some more detail the specific “ideologies” and “weirdo stuff” you think librarians are peddling in schools? You’re alluding to something specific but for some reason won’t say it?

Also, I know several parents who would love to see Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings banned because they say they are about the Occult and demons and Anti-Christian and so on. Many are vocal about it at school board meetings. I don’t think librarians should give in to these bullies, either.
Something went wrong.

You're using an unsupported browser. Try updating to a modern browser.

Safari on iOS18.

If one of my two active content blockers is making your site not work, your site is not worth my time.
>Why do these companies get to say what you do with your camera, how you order food, or who you date? Their App Store dictatorship lets them control all of this.

Can you share some examples of when this happened to you?
The one about "developing coping mechanisms rather than skills" definitely resonated. Life isn't gonna be perfect though so learning how to cope with less than ideal situations is a required skill.
> I'm in a few communities that like to read novels from China / Korea. Claude Sonnet translates is able Mandarin to English almost perfectly.

What novels are you reading?

This is fascinating to me, because the world is quickly becoming a place where we have to choose which information from the unlimited information stream to consume. It feels like unlimited opportunity cost. I, for one, don't think I'll ever have enough time to watch every Academy Award nominated film (let alone all of the winners). And that's just one type of information.

You're going after some obscure (?) stuff. What brought about the interest?
This is not countering the lizard brain statement. People are are against assisted suicide even without knowing that Canada thing.
All right, mister smarty pants. Let's hear it then: What is a better explanation than "this app need camera permissions, because it takes photos, because it is a fucking camera app"?
Because a search engine is not an answer engine. I just type 'daylight saving time uk' and 'daylight saving time us' and the answer was right at the top [0].

You're supposed to give a query, not a question (even though google et al. have worked hard to trick people into that). Which is why search engines works for me even if there are lot of garbage filled sites.

[0]: https://ibb.co/GpZ19nK (screenshot)
a bit of a tangent but regarding the translation, can you compare it to the work of a human translator>? I often find translated works unsatisfying. While the fault may well be with me, I thought the Three Body Problem was a pretty poor piece of fiction (yes, I know, HN loves it, mea culpa etc) but I wonder if I dislike the original work, or the rendering in English.
The Soundless Interstitium
Some oddly defensive reactions here. Wall St losing faith doesn't mean the tech is bad, just that they're not happy with the returns they're seeing. Plus, AI seems particularly susceptible to these extreme hype cycles. If it's legit, then it will pan out eventually. If not, then it will lay the foundation for something bigger.
First, to preface: Believe it or not, I am far from an Apple fanboy. I have never owned an iPhone, Apple Watch, Mac, or MacBook for personal use. I have owned one iPad, which I bought a few years ago. I also like the AirPods. I like (and dislike) a lot of things about Apple's DX, and I dislike (and like) a lot of things about their UX.

That said,

I agree, lack of consistency is frustrating. But there is a big caveat to that opinion. When I experience inconsistent rejection, it has always been due to things that are reasonable to not catch as a reviewer 100% of the time. But personally, I would rather they catch 75% of instances of a problem than give up and let them all through because the inconsistency is frustrating. Of course, I would really like them to get that number to 100%, but I acknowledge that a lot of this stuff is not easily captured at a 100% rate using a tester script, or automatic processing. The key here is of course that you agree with or understand the rule they are enforcing. This is probably where most of the disagreement actually lies, and not so much in the inconsistency. I happen to be the kind of "purist" who would rather things be stricter for developers. I want the UX to be as good as possible, and I want the APIs to continue to improve and to not burden/complicate the platform with a lot of backwards compatibility. This is the opposite of a lot of developers, and I totally understand the other side of that argument.

This is not to say that Apple review is not shitty sometimes. I just happen to think that the one or two biggest things developers complain about seem to not be as clear-cut as developers describe.
I guess you could format a diff patch file locally and paste it as a text comment in an issue in their repo...? :P
That said the current government have introduced legislation to bring these TOCs into public ownership as franchises expire [0]. Rolling stock and freight will remain privately owned so it isn’t quite a return to the days of British Rail, but the privatisation experiment is coming to a close.

[0] https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3732
Any new tech gets hyped to the moon because of theoretical use cases. The tech then comes up against genuine limitations and reality sets in. Work is done to get around the limitations, and useful products get built. However if you compare what got built to the theoretical products at the height of the hype cycle, you will find them wanting.

AI (as in GenAI) will be no different. I would not call that a bust.
The question isn’t whether people like or dislike something, the comment I commented on stated that free markets depend on transparent pricing which in my humble opinion cannot be further from the truth.