skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yep. That was a one-time occurrence, due to (a) inspections being deferred during COVID and (b) France's long time catastrophic underinvestment in their nuclear fleet.

Until March 2023, there was a law in France that made it illegal to increase nuclear capacity in absolute terms and mandated reduction to under 50% in relative terms.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=isgu-VrD0oM

But again, a one-time event, and it doesn't change the high capacity factors world-wide (over 80%) and the extremely high capacity factors in reasonably well run fleets ( > 90% in the US, and also inGermany when they still had nuclear ).
We are just collecting emails on the Google form as contact information to get more details when shipping samples. I am sorry that the form is asking for a google account - we will fix that as soon as possible.
Personally I just build all my software so it includes its dependencies and then you don't need docker or any complex image manager. Don't rely on a bunch of crap being installed in the system path! Much much simpler this way imho.
Yup +1 for Rancher Desktop. Works as smooth as Docker Desktop on MacOS.
There are two approaches to using compose w/ podman:

Replace docker-compose with podman-compose -- somewhat limited capabilities, but works in a lot of cases.

Use docker-compose against podman w/ podman's system service, which provides a docker compatible API endpoint (https://docs.podman.io/en/v5.2.1/markdown/podman-system-serv...). This basically has full docker-compose capabilities, but, you do need run the socket service as a specific user account which end up running all the pods.
I've really enjoyed using Orbstack: https://orbstack.dev/

it also has support for Linux VMs and kubernetes (although i haven't tried that yet)
To me, proper capitalization is easier to parse - not massively so, but a little bit. So writing without caps is a bit of a jerk move. You're making it harder for me to read, either because you're lazy or because you want to affect a style. In either case it's a bit of a jerk move.

It's more of a jerk move when it's done on a discussion board, because what you write once is read multiple times. So the cost multiplies, but (if due to laziness) the benefit only occurs once.

Now, in something like texting, I understand, when you're trying to type on that teeny phone keyboard. It's harder to hit the shift key when you don't have a spare finger because you're only using one. But for something like here, take the time and the effort to make it better for your readers.
Anytime I have a discord tab open it noticeably grinds my computer to a halt
is it impossible to fix that issue in pdflatex?
GNU find on rhel9 has explicit warnings about the -exec option:

"There are unavoidable security problems surrounding use of the -exec action; you should use the -execdir option instead."

"If you are using find in an environment where security is important (for example if you are using it to search directories that are writable by other users), you should read the `Security Considerations' chapter of the findutils documentation, which is called Finding Files and comes with findutils. That document also includes a lot more detail and discussion than this manual page, so you may find it a more useful source of information."
Letter to a Junior Programmer
I've never been asked that and I'm in my sixties.
As for what it is sensing, we learn end to end policies in this case, and allow the neural network can pick up on whatever it needs for the particular task! but we have run experiments with a predecessor of AnySkin, ReSkin: https://reskin.dev that indicate you can localize contact at sub-mm scale as well as sense normal and shear forces!
I found it, like an actual cat, extremely distracting.
This is perhaps a bit meta, but I wonder if LLMs as a legal analysis accelerator will be eventually compensated by LLMs to allow vastly more law and policy to be produced. For example, every neighborhood could have a customized body of law that differs in either small, scattered ways or even large ways.
I was being pretty generous with my timespans. 30 years ago was 1994. Personal computers had existed for quite a long time by then. The Apple Mac launched in 1984.

Open source did exist in 1994: projects like Linux and Python were started around 1991 but nearly nobody knew about them or used them. The average person or developer in 1994 had zero encounters with open source software. Even by 2000 this was still the case: the average developer was working with Visual Basic or Delphi or Visual Studio (all proprietary) using the Windows API or VBX/OCX controls as libraries (proprietary), connecting to Oracle, SQL Server or Access for data (proprietary) and if they were bold, rendering web UIs from IIS or Netscape's servers (proprietary) to Internet Explorer or Netscape Communicator (all proprietary). If they were cutting edge like Google they might be using Linux as a server kernel, but that was rare and a source of competitive advantage. Google wrote all of its own internal libraries starting from the STL upwards partly because there just weren't that many to adopt if you worked on Linux.

> It’s just hard to find learning resources on reverse engineering hardware, since that isn’t the entry point for programmers anymore.

Well, two books is a lot. Back in the day there were none :) I think this shows the issue, right? Yes there are more developers overall, but there are also more opportunities and things to do. Why would you spend hours slaving over a buggy wifi driver when you could try your hand at writing a mobile app instead, which might make you rich? Back in the 90s this was far less of an option for most developers. The original motivation was a desire to use something other than Windows on PC class hardware, but that desire has been satiated by Apple for a long time and desktop Linux remains obscure.

I've experienced all of this. My first open source project was on Windows, back when open source was novel and new. Then I worked on Linux for a while - I had code in Wine and GNOME and a few other things. Then I wrote open source libraries and took part in Bitcoin. These days I do open source work for pay and also sell a proprietary developer tool. So, seen it from every angle. My gut feeling is that we're going to see a resurgence of proprietary platforms and libraries in the coming years.
"free advice is often worth as much as you pay for it"... indeed if you get advice together with the context and thought framework description that lead to the advice, you often get more yield out of the latter. It makes you apply such framework for other problems, or else, it shows that the advisor did not really have the correct mental model of your particular problem.
Focusing on customers and MVPs over complex architecture makes sense, but whether you have 10 or 1 million users, for any real business, you need to be ready to recover from outages.

Building for resilience early sets the foundation for scaling later. That’s why I’m not a fan of relying on "one big server." No matter how powerful, it can still fail.

By focusing on resilience, you're naturally one step closer to scaling across multiple servers. Sure, it’s easy to overcomplicate things, but investing in scalable infrastructure from the start has benefits, even with low traffic—it's all about finding the right balance.
Even Chrome wouldn't dare
See also a recent interview of this guy at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41539235
Inspired by a Post on X/Twitter on creating a shining stroke in figma, I thought that I can create it using CSS multi layered background images that are blended on a color-dodge mode, and masking them along with clipping those masks and compositing them in subtract to show only the border, also used css custom properties to manage the gradient direction, border-size, square size
Sure, but "fire is hot" isn't much of a joke.
Hyundai actually has two systems, LKA and LFA. LKA just tries to bounce the car back when it detects lane edges, LFA actively keeps the car in the middle of a lane.

All Hyundai models in Europe have LKA, some (more expensive) also have LFS.
I didn't know what 'heteronormative culture' was, so I went to look it up. I found this: "Heteronormativity is the concept that heterosexuality is the preferred or normal sexual orientation."
It seems to me to be a pretty radical idea that culture could not be 'heteronormative' because heterosexuality IS the preferred and normal sexual orientation since 1-babies need to be born for existence to perpetuate (this is basically the purpose of life) and 2-non-heterosexual people continue to this day (even with all the radical celebration of deviance) to be a tiny minority. That said I think it is dumb to try to pressure kids to 'be straight' (lol, you don't choose who you're attracted to). If you're saying 'to live as you choose' to mean 'to live as a single person with no familial support', then yea, you're setting yourself up for a rough time and I can't imagine how you're going to 'restructure the culture' to support this, nor why you would want to aside from attempts at self gratification.

I don't even know what you're talking about with this 'Freedom to leave a marriage' part. It seems like a smorgasbord of ideas smashed together rather incoherently, my apologies but it's after lunch and maybe my brain isn't all functioning 100%.

Ok I also don't understand what you're talking about in 'Fewer mental health isues' either. It seems like you're trying really hard to imagine a fantasy reality where non-heterosexual people can live by themselves - but with a partner if they want - but they can leave - but they should be able to leave and be by themselves and be just fine - all with regard to COOKING specifically. Am I getting in the ball park there? I don't really know what you're getting at. When you deviate from 'normal' culture, life is going to be harder for you. That's how our world works. The people that have and are trying to change that... just watch for if things are getting better in their wake, or worse in their wake.

I suspect economic stability comes more from personal responsibility than 'personal flexibility'. One must make great sacrifices, in general, to develop the character to be able to progress in most areas. What I typically see from the crowd wanting more freedoms is the freedom to be more hedonistic, where I see the people more grateful to exist and actually progressing growing their discipline and losing their selfishness.

>>> "in crisis due to various social factors making full-time wives and moms relatively rare"

>>> "It seems likely to me we need to rethink and rework our food culture so everyone can eat adequately"

How could the second work without fixing the first?
It's nice, but only for personal use.

Be aware that you need a license if you use it at work.
Intel peaked with the PPro
The financial crisis had an outsized impact on the UK plus we topped it off with a poorly implemented separation from the EU.
No. I have some guesses. A credit reporting company can probably sell access to their data for good money if the account is locked but not if it is frozen?

Put otherwise if a bank asks experian to look at my credit report and experian tells them to take a hike because my account is frozen, that’s not worth much money to the bank. But that’s the only credit account configuration that has any value to me, so I’ll insist on it.

I think “freezing” and the dynamics thereof are established by federal law, while “locked” is a think the companies made up so they had an account setting that they could provide that would give the illusion of security, while maintaining the ability to sell information associated with the account.

In other words: evil people do evil things when we aren’t paying sufficient attention. It’s our job to hold them accountable.
That wouldn’t last long before they caught on.
Interesting! Presumably I've downranked Forbes at some point over the past few years, I get useful results in Kagi.
You never want that, but sometimes you can't get the other way.
> #2 has essentially no downsides and is radically simpler.

If you're with AWS, you'll be charged for IPv4 public addresses:

* https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-aws-public-ipv4-address...

If you want to 'own' IPv4 addresses, that'll cost you as well:

* https://auctions.ipv4.global

Certainly some will be needed for 'legacy' purposes for the foreseeable future, but the more you can reduce the use of them at your edge, the less money you'll be shelling out.
Wouldn’t the ETF (Erlang Term Format) suffice in this case?

IIRC it’s used in the desktop client and some community libraries (specifically JDA) have support for it.

There were some quirks regarding ETF usage with Discord’s Gateway but I can’t recall at the moment.
"how do you attract customers?"

You're in a tight spot because you're asking this question after the product was built.

#Who is my customer, where can they be found, how do I reach them, what do they buy now, who do they buy from already, how much does it cost to get in front of them, what modalities do they respond to, how do competitors price, position, and reach them? What is the actual problem, what are the core benefits they seek, what solutions exist today and what do they lack or ignore?

These are questions that need to be answered prior to building anything.

You will have an incredibly difficult time selling what you have now if this research was not performed beforehand. Do this the research and then decide if you can save it. Otherwise, you've learned a valuable lesson and should start anew. Many great projects were built upon the bones of past mistakes.
I would love to use it but I loathe subscriptions, especially for something I’d need work to pay for. I would happily pay a one-time $50-100 and get a perpetual license so I don’t have to deal with the headache…
What does podman desktop offer that WSL does not (at least for those of us on Windows)?
I think that's the right way to do it from the software distributor's side, but most software distributors don't do it like you.

So, from a consumer's point of view, if you want to use their software, then docker is the lesser evil compared to all the others. Notably, it's much better than binaries with dynamic libraries that don't come included in the bundle itself.
i was hands-on CTO of a "startup" or "scaleup", or "sell-us-up" as i call these. Which it did. Profitable, Acquired, Squarely. Thanking with total 0 to the employees, me included. "Not a charity here". Then things went rather political.. pissing on my values. So: i quit. Over and out. Gone. Then.. with 3 kids.. F*k it. Bought ancient campervan (not enough money for newer one), hmmm, $$$ runway is 7-8 months, fixed it DIY, went around country doing what i like.. and NOT think about end-of-runway.. On and on.. plus and minus planned and unplanned, needed and unneeded spendings.. Well, 7 months later, some runway left. And i am on the look. Did the above help ? dunno.

Entry level? you have sooo much freedom to move. Away and beyond. Pick your battles.. elsewhere.

btw: HR are there to defend the company from employees. Not other way around.
SQLite HC-Tree
That's compression time, the parent is talking about the end user so we want decompression time instead.
they say "AnySkin uses the same 5-magnetometer circuitry as ReSkin,". and ReSkin uses Melexis MLX90393.

(Interesting fact: in MLX90393, you can customize 2 lower address bits using config pins, and there are multiple part numbers which only differ in higher address bits - so a single bus can have dozens of magnetometers attached. It's a very helpful feature, a lot of magnetometers are designed for compass use only, and thus have no support for address customization at all)
This is awesome Vincent, Tensordict x CleanRL x torch.compile is the most ambitious crossover
the point being more that they can chatgpt their assignments and then use their new-found free time to go do something interesting instead.
At first this seems like a fairly understandable "the workers didn't double check the property lines and accidentally used land they didn't own". That's bad, but the kind of mistake that anybody could make.

Where the whole story goes to shit is when SpaceX comes back with "here's a pittance, take it or leave it, you have 12 hours". That's like dealing with the mob. Musk could personally spend 0.000028% of his net worth to offer them double the current value for their land and avoid this whole story. Or at least not come across looking like a total asshole for once. Instead it is going to the court, where he is almost certainly going to lose as this is a fairly open and shut trespassing case, and end up spending way more in legal fees and fines.

When a regular person makes a mistake they try to make it right. When Elon makes a mistake he doubles down on it and tries to bully the other side.
Hursh, can you please respond to the above commenter? As an early adopter, I find it fairly troubling to see a company that touts transparency hide the blog post and only publicly "own up to it" within the confines of a single HN thread.
A big problem that comes up a lot when trying to think of ways to replace a centralized business is that the friction inherent in a decentralized system costs more than the profit margin of a centralized business.

An end user wants to pay a steady monthly fee for internet that never goes down. A property owner wants to get a steady monthly check for leasing a site. A technician wants to get a steady salary for fixing nodes.

A decentralized repair network is likely to reduce reliability for end users, predictability for property owners, and job security for technicians. All three of these parties may find it more optimal to have an ISP business which can finance and coordinate things, even if the business is taking profit which could have gone to the other participants.
> Isn't there a way to dynamically select between numpy and cupy, depending on whether you want cpu or gpu code?

CuPy is an (almost) drop-in replacement for NumPy, so the following works surprisingly often:

if use_cpu:
import numpy as np
else:
import cupy as np
You're so disproportionately upset about some minor administrative hassles. I certainly don't find it "exploitative" or "unjust" that Americans retain the rights and responsibilities of citizenship worldwide.

No one's stopping you from renouncing your citizenship if you're really this upset about it. (I'm sure this suggestion will trigger a long screed about how tragic the exit penalty is)
Three Mile Island nuclear plant to restart, power Microsoft data centers
My issue is the bypassing of the systems package manager. Doing so will result on files spread somewhere over the system. How do you uninstall such thing properly? How do you update (or even know) it's dependencies? Will it break because I uninstall or update one of it's dependencies?

Linux has a very good package management for many years. I see absolute no reason to break this by creating shell installers.
> gethostbyname

Hmm:

> The gethostbyname*(), gethostbyaddr*(), herror(), and hstrerror() functions are obsolete. Applications should use getaddrinfo(3), getnameinfo(3), and gai_strerror(3) instead.

* https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/gethostbyaddr.3.html
> There are 2,000 people at the company. About 500 of those are in the engineering organization Within that 500, about 150 work on the broadest definition of “infrastructure engineering,” things like developer tools, compute and orchestration, networking, security engineering, and so on

> Unless we can increase YoY growth by 5-10%, they expect us to improve free cash flow by 5-10% each year,

> Growth in the primary business line is shrinking

You know what group is in for imminent downsizing once the investors insist you try to reconcile the shrinking revenue with the increased profit expectations? Those 150 infrastructure engineering employees. They're going to be looking at the fact that they can't directly attribute revenue to 40% of their most expensive subset of employees (Maybe second to executives, but guess who gets to make this decision).

And then all the inhouse tooling to make that monolith work will slowly rot. They'll say something like "Oh, well we expect people operating to give some percentage of their time to maintaining common infra", but that mostly won't happen, as individual product units insist on feature churn.

Then this will go on for maybe another 3 years, at which point getting a change in is hell because your test suites don't work, your onboarding docs are missing a thousand tiny details and security is randomly finding a team to upgrading that damn mysql database which now has a RCE vulnerability, except all the common tooling is all a big ball of yarn that everything depends on everything else and can't be updated without refactoring the whole lot.

And then you'll wonder why it takes 3 months to ship a button that takes users to a static page in your application.

Slightly exaggerated, but I've seen this pattern too many times, so I'm generally for a lot more autonomy for teams, at the risk of some duplication.
The real problem with Open Core
Interesting tech. I've considered implementing something similar but for WebSockets. I'd love to see some data on how effective it is at various levels of packet loss. To guarantee complete avoidance of HoL blocking you would need 1 TCP connection per channel/stream.
To be fair, this is exactly what the Accept and Content-Type standard HTTP headers are for. Clients can tell the API "OK, send me application/json data instead of binary data" or vice versa. You can have the majority of your traffic (client traffic) using the binary format, and still support JSON for bot API usage. This is standardized for both WebSockets and HTTP.
As a user, I'd rather use a container then figure out how to run a binary. The onboarding process is typically so much easier, and most enterprise folks already have container infrastructure in place. For big customers, getting a Kubernetes namespace can have significantly less friction than a VM these days.
Do you think people should have to get permission to host a server on the internet?
There's also a nice architectural diagram on their GitHub page: https://github.com/lichess-org/lila
Really great product, I'm using inngest since 2-3 months and it definitely solved our problem. We needed a scheduling, queue, trigger solution. The docs are fairly good and it worked after some fiddling with our setup. I can quickly see every morning if all the jobs went through, we also starting to use them for webhooks now. Very happy, wrote at least 10 different functions in typescript so far
Thank you, and sorry for being so blind. I think this is enough to sell me on one!
zstd has faster decompression

though I always thought lz4 to be the sweet spot for anything requiring speed, somewhat less compression ratio in exchange for very fast compression and decompression
Qualcomm explores acquiring pieces of Intel chip-design business
Never heard of a "surface wave acoustical filter" before. I love it. Whoever came up with the first iteration of that was a genius, a real out-of-the-box thinker. https://www.everythingrf.com/community/what-is-a-saw-filter

Who gets handed the problem of how to filter some EM and think to themselves hey, let's try turning this into sound...?
Introducing Community Tools on HuggingChat
> For the UK the financial sector was a dramatically important one

The Finance Curse: Britain and the World Economy

• Outlines harms caused to countries hosting an oversized financial sector

• Argues Britain is subject to a Finance Curse, which carries many similarities with the Resource Curse, afflicting mineral-exporting countries

• Provides a narrative and framework to analyse the political economy of finance and financialisation

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/136914811561279...

The Resource Curse:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse